[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 117 (Tuesday, June 18, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28235-28237]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12748]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0560; FRL-9994-90]

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subspecies plantarum strain FZB42;
Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subspecies
plantarum strain FZB42 in or on all food commodities when used in
accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices.
Andermatt Biocontrol AG (c/o SciReg, Inc.) submitted a petition to EPA
under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation
eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for
residues of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subspecies plantarum strain
FZB42 in or on all food commodities under FFDCA.

DATES: This regulation is effective June 18, 2019. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before August 19, 2019 and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0560, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460-0001; main telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0560 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
August 19, 2019. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please

submit a copy of the filing (excluding any Confidential Business
Information (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. Information not
marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly
by EPA without prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection
or hearing request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-
0560, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional
instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Background

    In the Federal Register of May 18, 2018 (83 FR 23247) (FRL-9976-
87), EPA issued a Notice pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance petition (PP
7F8620) by Andermatt Biocontrol AG, Stahlermatten 6, CH-6146
Grossdietwil, Switzerland (c/o SciReg, Inc., 12733 Director's Loop,
Woodbridge, VA 22192). The petition requested that 40 CFR part 180 be
amended by establishing an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of the fungicide Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
subspecies plantarum strain FZB42 in or on all food commodities. That
Notice referenced a summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner
Andermatt Biocontrol AG and available in the docket via http://www.regulations.gov. Comments were received on the notice of filing.
EPA's response to these comments is discussed in Unit III.C.

III. Final Rule

A. EPA's Safety Determination

    Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through
drinking water and in residential settings but does not include
occupational exposure. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in
establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance or tolerance exemption and
to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .'' Additionally, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D)
requires that EPA consider ``available information concerning the
cumulative effects of [a particular pesticide's] . . . residues and
other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
    EPA evaluated the available toxicity and exposure data on Bacillus
amyloliquefaciens subspecies plantarum strain FZB42 and considered
their validity, completeness, and reliability, as well as the
relationship of this information to human risk. A full explanation of
the data upon which EPA relied and its risk assessment based on those
data can be found within the document entitled ``Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) Safety Determination for Bacillus
amyloliquefaciens subspecies plantarum strain FZB42'' (Safety
Determination). This document, as well as other relevant information,
is available in the docket for this action as described under
ADDRESSES.
    The available data demonstrated that, with regard to humans,
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subspecies plantarum strain FZB42 is not
toxic, pathogenic, or infective via any route of exposure. Although
there may be some exposure to residues when Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
subspecies plantarum strain FZB42 is used on food commodities in
accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices,
dietary exposure to such residues presents no concern for adverse
effects. EPA also determined that a Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
safety factor was not necessary as part of the qualitative assessment
conducted for Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subspecies plantarum strain
FZB42. These findings are discussed in more detail in the Safety
Determination.
    Based upon its evaluation in the Safety Determination, EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
to the U.S. population, including infants and children, from aggregate
exposure to residues of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subspecies plantarum
strain FZB42. Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance is established for residues of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
subspecies plantarum strain FZB42 in or on all food commodities when
used in accordance with label directions and good agricultural
practices.

B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    An analytical method is not required because EPA is establishing an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance without any numerical
limitation.

C. Response to Comments

    Three comments were received in response to the notice of filing.
EPA reviewed the comments and determined that they are irrelevant to
the tolerance exemption in this action.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes a tolerance exemption under FFDCA section
408(d) in response to a petition submitted to EPA. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order 13771, entitled ``Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs'' (82 FR 9339, February 3,
2017). This action does not contain any information collections subject
to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income

Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance
exemption in this action, do not require the issuance of a proposed
rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.) do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes. As a result, this
action does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, EPA has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal
governments, on the relationship between the national government and
the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, EPA has determined that
Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), and Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not
impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require EPA's consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

V. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: June 10, 2019.
Richard Keigwin,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

0
2. Add Sec.  180.1367 to subpart D to read as follows:

Sec.  180.1367  Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subspecies plantarum strain
FZB42; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance.

    An exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established for
residues of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subspecies plantarum strain
FZB42 in or on all food commodities when used in accordance with label
directions and good agricultural practices.

[FR Doc. 2019-12748 Filed 6-17-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 103 (Thursday, May 28, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32100-32101]
[FR Doc No: 2020-11391]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2019-0047; Notice 1]

Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming
Model Year 2018 Indian Scout Motorcycles Are Eligible for Importation

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Receipt of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) receipt of a petition for a decision that model
year (MY) 2018 Indian Scout motorcycles that were not originally
manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety
standards (FMVSS), are eligible for importation into the United States
because they are substantially similar to vehicles that were originally
manufactured for sale in the United States and that were certified by
their manufacturer as complying with the safety standards (the U.S.-
certified version of the 2018 Indian Scout motorcycles) and are capable
of being readily altered to conform to the standards.

DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is June 29, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
     Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
except for Federal Holidays.
     Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Comments may also be faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than

15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard along with
the comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided.
    All comments and supporting materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the fullest extent possible.
    All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID number for this petition is shown
in the heading of this notice.
    DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Mazurowski, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, NHTSA<PHONE_NUMBER>).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not
originally manufactured to conform to all applicable FMVSS shall be
refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that
the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle
originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United
States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same MY as the
model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all applicable FMVSS.
    Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either
manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to
49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice
of each petition that it receives in the Federal Register, and affords
interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the
close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is
eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in
the Federal Register.
    Skytop Rover Co., (Registered Importer R-6-343), of Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether nonconforming MY
2018 Indian Scout motorcycles are eligible for importation into the
United States. The vehicles which Skytop Rover Co. believes are
substantially similar are MY 2018 Indian Scout motorcycles sold in the
United States and certified by their manufacturer as conforming to all
applicable FMVSS and are capable of being readily altered to conform to
all applicable FMVSS.
    Skytop Rover Co. submitted information with its petition intended
to demonstrate that non-U.S. certified MY 2018 Indian Scout
motorcycles, as originally manufactured, conform to many applicable
FMVSS, or are capable of being readily altered to conform to those
standards. Specifically, the petitioner claims that the non-U.S.
certified MY 2018 Indian Scout motorcycles, as originally manufactured,
conform to: FMVSS Nos. 106, Brake Hoses, 108, Lamps, Reflective
Devices, and Associated Equipment, 111, Rear Visibility, 116, Motor
Vehicle Brake Fluids, 119, New Pneumatic Tires for Motor Vehicles with
a GVWR of More Than 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) and Motorcycles,
122, Motorcycle Brake Systems, 123, Motorcycle Controls and Displays,
205, Glazing Materials, and the requirements of 49 CFR part 565,
Vehicle Identification Requirements.
    The petitioner also contends that the subject non-U.S. certified
vehicles are capable of being readily altered to meet the following
FMVSS, in the manner indicated:
    FMVSS No. 120, Tire Selection and Rims and Motor Home/Recreation
Vehicle Trailer Load Carrying Capacity Information for Motor Vehicles
with a GVWR of More Than 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds): A tire
placard will be added.

(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), (a)(1)(B), and (b)(1); 49 CFR
593.7; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8)

Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020-11391 Filed 5-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register: November 28, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 228)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 68750-68751]
[DOCID:fr28no06-8]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 707

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0058; FRL-8104-9]
RIN 2070-AJ01

Export Notification; Change to Reporting Requirements; Technical
Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a final rule in the Federal Register of November
14, 2006, concerning amendments to the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA) section 12(b) export notification regulations at subpart D of 40
CFR part 707. This document is being issued to correct a typographical
error.

DATES: This technical correction is effective January 16, 2007. In
accordance with 40 CFR 23.5, this rule shall be promulgated for
purposes of judicial review at 1 p.m. eastern daylight/standard time on
December 12, 2006.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0058. All documents in the
docket are listed on the regulations.gov website at http://www.regulations.gov.
 Although listed in the index, some information is

not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
Internet and will be publicly

available only in hard copy form. The EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC)
suffered structural damage due to flooding in June 2006. Although the
EPA/DC is continuing operations, there will be temporary changes to the
EPA/DC during the clean-up. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room, which was
temporarily closed due to flooding, has been relocated in the EPA
Headquarters Library, Infoterra Room (Room Number 3334) in EPA West,
located at 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the EPA/DC
Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the
OPPT Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. EPA visitors are required to show
photographic identification and sign the EPA visitor log. Visitors to
the EPA/DC Public Reading Room will be provided with an EPA/DC badge
that must be visible at all times while in the EPA Building and
returned to the guard upon departure. In addition, security personnel
will escort visitors to and from the new EPA/DC Public Reading Room
location. Up-to-date information about the EPA/DC is on the EPA Web
site at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information contact: Colby
Lintner, Regulatory Coordinator, Environmental Assistance Division
(7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    For technical information contact: Kenneth Moss, Chemical Control
Division (7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    The Agency included in the final rule a list of those who may be
potentially affected by this action. If you have questions regarding
the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the
technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document and Other
Related Information?

    In addition to using regulations.gov, you may access this Federal
Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the
``Federal Register'' listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr.

II. What Does this Correction Do?

    This correction restores to the first sentence of the introductory
text at 40 CFR 707.60(c)(2) the phrase ``where such chemical substance
or mixture is present in a concentration of less than 0.1% (by weight
or volume).'' The corrected first sentence of Sec. 707.60(c)(2) will
now read: ``No notice of export is required for the export of a
chemical substance or mixture that is a known or potential human
carcinogen where such chemical substance or mixture is present in a
concentration of less than 0.1% (by weight or volume).'' Without the
correction to 40 CFR 707.60(c)(2), the rule does not have the effect,
as clearly stated in the proposed rule and elsewhere in the preamble to
the final rule, of establishing a de minimis level for reporting of
carcinogens under TSCA section 12(b).

III. Why is this Correction Issued as a Final Rule?

    Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a final rule without
providing notice and an opportunity for public comment. EPA has
determined that there is good cause for making this technical
correction final without prior proposal and opportunity for comment,
for the reasons mentioned in Unit II. The missing phrase in the
regulatory text of the final rule at 40 CFR 707.60(c)(2) appears in the
regulatory text of the proposed rule as well as throughout the preamble
of the final rule, such that the intent to include it in the regulatory
text of the final rule is clear. The phrase was inadvertently left out
of the regulatory text of the final rule during Agency editing and
preparation of the final rule. EPA finds that this constitutes good
cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).

IV. Do Any of the Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Apply to this
Action?

    No. This document is a technical correction to a recently issued
final rule and does not impose any new requirements. EPA's compliance
with the statutes and Executive orders for the underlying final rule is
discussed in Unit VII. of the final rule that was issued on November
14, 2006 (71 FR 66234, at 66243).

V. Will EPA Submit this Final Rule to Congress and the Comptroller
General?

    Yes. The Congressional Review Act (CRA) (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.)
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. As with the final rule, since this
technical correction is considered a rule under the CRA, EPA will
submit a rule report to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not
a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 707

    Environmental protection, Chemicals, Exports, Hazardous substances,
Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: November 20, 2006.
Susan B. Hazen,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and
Toxic Substances.
    Under EPA's authority, 15 U.S.C. 2611(b) and 2612, FR Doc. E6-19182
published in the Federal Register of November 14, 2006 (71 FR 66234)
(FRL-8101-3) is corrected as follows:

Sec.  8707.60  [Corrected]

0
On page 66244, in the second column, in Sec.  707.60 Applicability and
compliance, the first sentence of the introductory text of paragraph
(c)(2) is corrected to read as follows:
    ``No notice of export is required for the export of a chemical
substance or mixture that is a known or potential human carcinogen
where such chemical substance or mixture is present in a concentration
of less than 0.1% (by weight or volume).''
[FR Doc. E6-20148 Filed 11-27-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 218 (Thursday, November 10, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78906-78908]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27093]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2016-4172; Airspace Docket No. 16-ASW-7]

Amendment of Class E Airspace for the Following Arkansas Towns;
Blytheville, AR; Brinkley, AR; Clarksville, AR; and DeQueen, AR

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action modifies Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface at Arkansas International Airport,
Blytheville, AR; Blytheville Municipal Airport, Blytheville, AR; Frank
Federer Memorial Airport, Brinkley, AR; Clarksville Municipal Airport,
Clarksville, AR; and J. Lynn Helms Sevier County Airport, De Queen, AR.
Decommissioning of non-directional radio beacons (NDBs), cancellation
of

NDB approaches, and implementation of area navigation (RNAV) procedures
have made this action necessary for the safety and management of
Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the above airports. This
action also updates the name of Arkansas International Airport, and the
geographic coordinates for Arkansas International Airport, Blytheville
Municipal Airport, and Clarksville Municipal Airport, to coincide with
the FAA's aeronautical database.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, March 2, 2017. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under Title 1,
Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual revision of
FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11A, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC, 20591; telephone: 202-267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11A at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to
http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11A, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX, 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends Class E airspace at Arkansas International Airport,
Blytheville, AR; Blytheville Municipal Airport, Blytheville, AR; Frank
Federer Memorial Airport, Brinkley, AR; Clarksville Municipal Airport,
Clarksville, AR; and J. Lynn Helms Sevier County Airport, De Queen, AR.

History

    On May 3, 2016, the FAA published in the Federal Register a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), (81 FR 26505) Docket No. FAA-2016-4172,
to modify Class E airspace at Arkansas International Airport,
Blytheville, AR; Blytheville Municipal Airport, Blytheville, AR; Frank
Federer Memorial Airport, Brinkley, AR; Clarksville Municipal Airport,
Clarksville, AR; and J. Lynn Helms Sevier County Airport, De Queen, AR.
Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.11A, dated August 3, 2016, and effective September 15,
2016, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1. The Class
E airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11A, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2016, and effective September 15,
2016. FAA Order 7400.11A is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11A lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 modifies Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface at the following airports:

Within 7-mile radius (reduced from an 8-mile radius) of Arkansas
International Airport (formerly Eaker AFB), and within a 6.5-mile
radius (reduced from a 7-mile radius) of Blytheville Municipal Airport,
Blytheville, AR, and updates the airport's geographic coordinates;
By removing the 7.3-mile extension to the north from the 6.4-mile
radius of Frank Federer Memorial Airport, Brinkley, AR;
Within a 7.3-mile radius (reduced from a 7.4-mile radius) of
Clarksville Municipal Airport, Clarksville, AR, and updates the
airport's geographic coordinates; and
Within a 6.5-mile radius (increased from a 6.4-mile radius) of J. Lynn
Helms Sevier County Airport, De Queen, AR.

    Airspace reconfiguration is necessary due to the decommissioning of
NDBs, cancellation of NDB approaches, or implementation of RNAV
procedures at the above airports. Controlled airspace is necessary for
the safety and management of the standard instrument approach
procedures for IFR operations at these airports.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5.a. This airspace action is not expected
to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71:

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment:

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11A,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2016, and
effective September 15, 2016, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASW AR E5 Blytheville, AR [Amended]

Blytheville, Arkansas International Airport, AR
    (Lat. 35[deg]57'52'' N., long. 89[deg]56'38'' W.)
Blytheville Municipal Airport, AR
    (Lat. 35[deg]56'26'' N., long. 89[deg]49'51'' W.)

That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7-mile radius of Arkansas International Airport and within
a 6.5-mile radius of Blytheville Municipal Airport.

ASW AR E5 Brinkley, AR [Amended]

Brinkley, Frank Federer Memorial Airport, AR
    (Lat. 34[deg]52'49'' N., long. 91[deg]10'35'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.4-mile radius of Frank Federer Memorial Airport.
* * * * *

ASW AR E5 Clarksville, AR [Amended]

Clarksville Municipal Airport, AR
    (Lat. 35[deg]28'15'' N., long. 93[deg]25'38'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7.3-mile radius of Clarksville Municipal Airport.
* * * * *

ASW AR E5 De Queen, AR [Amended]

De Queen, J. Lynn Helms Sevier County Airport, AR
    (Lat. 34[deg]02'49'' N., long. 94[deg]23'58'' W.)

That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.5-mile radius of J. Lynn Helms Sevier County Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on November 2, 2016.
Walter Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2016-27093 Filed 11-9-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 47 (Monday, March 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13526-13527]
[FR Doc No: 2017-04865]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Extension: Rule 102; SEC File No. 270-409, OMB Control No. 3235-0467]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of the
previously approved collection of information provided for in Rule 102
of Regulation M (17 CFR 242.102), under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
    Rule 102 prohibits distribution participants, issuers, and selling
security holders from purchasing activities at specified times during a
distribution of securities. Persons otherwise covered by these rules
may seek to use several applicable exceptions such as an exclusion for
actively traded reference securities and the maintenance of policies
regarding information barriers between their affiliates.
    There are approximately 998 respondents per year that require an
aggregate total of 1,898 hours to comply with this rule. Each
respondent makes an estimated 1 annual response. Each response takes on
average approximately 1.902 hours to complete. Thus, the total
compliance burden per year is 1,898 burden hours. The total internal
compliance cost for all respondents is approximately $123,370.00,
resulting in a cost of compliance per respondent of approximately
$124.00 (i.e., $123,370.00/998 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information
collection at the following Web site: www.reginfo.gov. Comments should
be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503 or by sending an email to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 or by sending an
email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB within
30 days of this notice.

    Dated: March 8, 2017.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-04865 Filed 3-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18101-18103]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06111]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0533; Airspace Docket No. 22-ANM-64]
RIN 2120-AA66

Modification of Class E Airspace; Pullman/Moscow Regional
Airport, Pullman/Moscow, WA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify the Class E airspace designated
as a surface area, modify the Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface, and remove the Class E airspace extending
upward from 1,200 feet above the surface at Pullman/Moscow Regional
Airport, Pullman/Moscow, WA. Additionally, this action proposes
administrative amendments to update the airport's existing Class E
airspace legal descriptions. These actions would support the safety and
management of instrument flight rule (IFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 11, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by FAA Docket No. [FAA-2022-0533]
and Airspace Docket No. [22-ANM-64] using any of the following methods:
    * Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your comments electronically.
    * Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    * Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
    * Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system
of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.

    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of
the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. You may also contact the Rules and
Regulations Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathan A. Chaffman, Federal Aviation
Administration, Western Service Center, Operations Support Group, 2200
S 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it would modify Class E airspace to support IFR operations
at Pullman/Moscow Regional Airport, Pullman/Moscow, WA.

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites interested persons to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal. The most
helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain
the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters
should submit only one time if comments are filed electronically, or
commenters should send only one copy of written comments if comments
are filed in writing.
    The FAA will file in the docket all comments it receives, as well
as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this
proposal, the FAA will consider all comments it receives on or before
the closing date for comments. The FAA will consider comments filed
after the comment period has closed if it is possible to do so without
incurring expense or delay. The FAA may change this proposal in light
of the comments it receives.

Availability of Rulemaking Documents

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at
www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Operations office (see ADDRESSES section for address, phone number, and
hours of operations). An informal docket may also be examined during
normal business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the
Federal Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western
Service Center, Operations Support Group, 2200 S 216th Street, Des
Moines, WA 98198.

Incorporation by Reference

    Class E2 and E5 airspace designations are published in paragraphs
6002 and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, which is incorporated by reference
in 14 CFR 71.1 on an annual basis. This document proposes to amend the
current version of that order, FAA Order JO 7400.11G, dated August 19,
2022 and effective September 15, 2022. These updates would be published
in the next update to FAA Order JO 7400.11. That order is publicly
available as listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11G lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas,
air traffic service routes, and reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 that would
modify the Class E airspace designated as a surface area, modify the
Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface, and
remove Class E airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the
surface at Pullman/Moscow Regional Airport, Pullman/Moscow, WA.
    The existing Class E surface area is comprised of a 4-mile radius
around the airport. This area should be expanded to better contain
departing IFR operations until they reach the base of adjacent
controlled airspace on the Runway (RWY) 23 Obstacle Departure Procedure
(ODP). A 4.5-mile radius around the airport would fully contain this
procedure and appropriately contain IFR arrival operations between the
surface and 1,000 feet above the surface. The existing extension
northeast of the surface area centered on the airport's 046[deg]
bearing should be centered on the 058[deg] bearing instead. It should
also be widened on either side of the bearing--from 1.7 miles to 2.3
miles--to better contain departing IFR operations until they reach the
base of adjacent controlled airspace on the RWY 5 ODP. The existing
southwest extension to the surface area is no longer needed and should
be removed.
    The existing Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface should be expanded 1.1 miles to the east to better contain
arriving IFR operations below 1,500 feet above the surface on the Area
Navigation (RNAV) Required Navigation Performance (RNP) Z RWY 23
approach. The existing Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface should be greatly reduced from the southeast
clockwise through the northeast as the airspace is no longer needed.
The existing Class E airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above
the surface should be removed, as the area is already within the
Spokane en route domestic airspace area.
    Finally, the FAA proposes administrative modifications to the
airport's legal descriptions. The city name on line 1 of the text
headers in both legal descriptions should be updated from ``Pullman''
to ``Pullman/Moscow'' to match the FAA's database. The geographic
coordinates located on line 3 of the text headers in both legal
descriptions should be updated to match the FAA's database. The Class E
surface area legal description should be updated to replace the
outdated use of the phrases ``Notice to Airmen'' and ``Airport/Facility
Directory.'' These phrases should read ``Notice to Air Missions'' and
``Chart Supplement,'' respectively, to align with the FAA's current
nomenclature.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical

regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current. It, therefore: (1) is not a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is
not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this proposed rule,
when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 19,
2022, and effective September 15, 2022, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as a Surface Area.

* * * * *

ANM WA E2 Pullman/Moscow, WA [Amended]

Pullman/Moscow Regional Airport, WA
    (Lat. 46[deg]44'30'' N, long. 117[deg]06'42'' W)

    That airspace within a 4.5-mile radius of the airport, and
within 2.3 miles each side of the 058[deg] bearing extending from
the 4.5-mile radius to 7 miles northeast of the airport. This Class
E airspace area is effective during the specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to Air Missions. The effective
date and time will thereafter be continuously published in the Chart
Supplement.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ANM WA E5 Pullman/Moscow, WA [Amended]

Pullman/Moscow Regional Airport, WA
    (Lat. 46[deg]44'30'' N, long. 117[deg]06'42'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
bounded by a line beginning at a point on the 055[deg] bearing, 11.1
miles from the airport, then clockwise along the airport's 11.1-mile
radius to the 122[deg] bearing, then to the 212[deg] bearing at 6.4
miles, then to the 243[deg] bearing at 7.3 miles, then to the
358[deg] bearing at 6.6 miles, thence to the point of beginning.
* * * * *

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on March 20, 2023.
B.G. Chew,
Group Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2023-06111 Filed 3-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: August 24, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 162)]
[Notices]
[Page 42733-42734]
[DOCID:fr24au09-125]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

3rd Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 219/Attitude and Heading
Reference System (AHRS)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 219 meeting; Attitude and
Heading Reference System (AHRS)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 219: Attitude and Heading Reference
System (AHRS).

DATES: The meeting will be held September 22-24, 2009 from 9 a.m. to 5
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW.,
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW.,
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (202)
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice
is hereby given for a Special Committee 219: Attitude and Heading
Reference System (AHRS) meeting. The agenda will include:

 Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks.
 Agenda overview.
 Review/Approve second meeting summary, RTCA Paper No. 034-09/
SC219-004, for the 3-5 February 2009 meeting.
 Review group document preparation options, and adopt a method
if appropriate.
 Working Group (WG) reports.
     WG-1--Performance & Testing Requirements.
     WG-2--Environmental Requirements.
     WG-3--Installation Requirements.
 New assignments.
 Working group sessions.
 Establish dates, location and agenda for next two meetings.
 Other business.
 Review minutes from the current meeting.

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 17, 2009.
Meredith Gibbs,
Staff Specialist, RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. E9-20276 Filed 8-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


______________________________________

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

EPA-HQ-AO-2007-0408 [Insert the FRL # ]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment
Request; Regulatory Pilot Projects (Renewal); EPA ICR No. 1755.08; OMB
Control No. 2010-0026

AGENCY:	Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION:	Notice.

SUMMARY:	In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), this document announces that EPA is planning to submit a
request to renew an existing approved Information Collection Request
(ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).  This ICR is
scheduled to expire on October 31, 2007.   Before submitting the ICR to
OMB for review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on specific
aspects of the proposed information collection as described below.

DATES:  Comments must be submitted on or before [insert date 60 days
after publication in the Federal Register].

ADDRESSES  (TBI):  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ–OA-2007-0408 identified by the Docket ID numbers provided for
each item in the text, by one of the following methods:

  HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov"  www.regulations.gov : Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.

     	•	Email:    HYPERLINK<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>

     	•	Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>

Mail: OA Docket, EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency,
Mail Code 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460

Hand Delivery: Office of the Administrator Docket in the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC

Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket’s normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.

Instructions:  Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-AO-2007-0408
identified by the Docket ID. EPA's policy is that all comments received
will be included in the public docket without change and may be made
available online at   HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov"
www.regulations.gov , including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be
CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or e-mail.  The
HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov"  www.regulations.gov  website is
an “anonymous access” system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment.  If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet.  If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit.  If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may
not be able to consider your comment.  Electronic files should avoid the
use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any
defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA’s public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm"
http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm .

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerald Filbin,  Office of Policy,
Economics, and Innovation, (1807T), Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:
202-566-2182  ; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

How Can I Access the Docket and/or Submit Comments?

	EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-AO-2007-0408, which is available for   SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 online
viewing at   HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov"  www.regulations.gov
,   SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 or in person viewing at the Office of the
Administrator Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC.  The EPA/DC Public
Reading Room   SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 is open from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the
Office of the Administrator Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

	Use   HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov"  www.regulations.gov  to
obtain a copy of the draft collection of information, submit or view
public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket,
and to access those documents in the public docket that are available
electronically.  Once in the system, select “search,” then key in
the docket ID number identified in this document.

What Information is EPA Interested In?

	Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA specifically solicits
comments and information to enable it to:

	(i) evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;

	(ii) evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;

(iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and

	(iv) minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In particular, EPA is requesting comments from
very small businesses (those that employ less than 25) on examples of
specific additional efforts that EPA could make to reduce the paperwork
burden for very small businesses affected by this collection.

What Should I Consider when I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:

    	1. Explain your views as clearly as possible and provide specific
examples.

    	2. Describe any assumptions that you used.

    	3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.

    	4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.

    	5. Offer alternative ways to improve the collection activity.

    	6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.

    	7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.

What Information Collection Activity or ICR Does this Apply to?

Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OA-2007-0408

Affected entities:  Entities potentially affected by this action are
primarily state environmental agencies seeking information from
facilities participating in or whose participation is being solicited
for pilot projects to test innovation in environmental permitting.
State and tribal environmental agencies that wish to provide input for
the annual competition solicitation, or that submit proposals in the
annual competition are also effected, as well as state agencies that are
recipients of State Innovation Grants that are required to report on
progress and outcomes for each grant-funded project.  Other parties
affected by this request may include industrial facilities and state
agencies that have been participants in Project XL in circumstances
where projects are being completed or terminated and information
characterizing the outcomes of those projects is being sought by EPA to
close out those individual projects.

Title:  Regulatory Reinvention Pilots

ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1755.08, OMB Control No. 2010-0026

ICR status:  This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on October 31,
2007. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.  The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal
Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed
either by publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate
means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if
applicable.  The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA
regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.

Abstract: This is an information collection request renewal that will
allow for the continued solicitation of proposals for innovative pilot
projects and to allow EPA to continue its commitments to monitor the
results of previous and ongoing pilot tests of regulatory innovation.
The renewal of this ICR is important as it will allow the Agency to
measure performance outcomes of regulatory innovation piloting and to
assess the broader applicability of those pilot projects.  The ICR is
also necessary to allow EPA to identify State and Tribal co-regulators
as well as additional regulated entities who are interested in
partnering with EPA in innovative pilot projects, allowing the Agency to
continue its commitment to innovation and regulatory flexibility with
facilities, communities, and states in achieving environmental results.
The renewal of this ICR will allow OEPI to continue to receive and work
with project sponsors on proposals for innovation.  Responses related to
Project XL are voluntary, as are any responses by state environmental
agencies to EPA’s request for input for the design of the annual
competition.  States seeking funding for an environmental regulatory
innovation project must submit a project proposal in the annual
competition (see   HYPERLINK "http://www.epa.gov/innovation/stategrants"
 http://www.epa.gov/innovation/stategrants ) to receive a grant award
and submittal of a proposal does not automatically guarantee an
assistance agreement between EPA and a state for the purpose of
implementing an innovation project.  In requiring the submittal of a
proposal in competition, EPA is adhering to its own policies on
competition (EPA 5700.7) and performance measurement (EPA 5700.8).
Similarly, states implementing innovative regulatory pilot tests in
projects funded by a State Innovation Grant are required to report on
progress during the operation of a project and to provide a final
project report summarizing outcomes and major findings of each project.
EPA’s policy on performance measurement in assistance agreements is an
implementation outcome under the Government Performance and Results Act
(GPRA § 1115 (a)(4) and §1116(c) ).  EPA’s innovation piloting
efforts  are multi-media in nature and  include programs authorized
under  the full range of authorizing legislation (e.g., the   SEQ
CHAPTER \h \r 1 Clean Air Act, Section 103 (b)(3) (42 U.S.C. § 7403
(b)(3)) the Clean Water Act, Section 104 (b)(3) (33 U.S.C. § 1254
(b)(3)); the Solid Waste Disposal Act, Section 8001 (42 U.S.C. §6981);
the Toxics Substances Control Act, Section 10 (15 U.S.C. §2609); the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, Section 20 (7
U.S.C. § 136r); and the Safe Drinking Water Act, Sections 1442 (a) and
(c) (42 U.S.C. § 1(a) and (c)).

Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden
for this collection of information is estimated to average 44 hours per
response.  Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal agency.  This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply
with any previously applicable instructions and requirements which have
subsequently changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a
collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the
collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.

	The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency’s estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here:

	Estimated total number of potential annual respondents: 1270

	Frequency of response:  35 quarterly; 1234 annually

	Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:  1.2

	Estimated total annual burden hours: 7748 hours.

	Estimated total annual costs: $ 331,460.  This includes an estimated
burden cost of $331,460 and an estimated cost of $0 for capital
investment or maintenance and operational costs.

Are There Changes in the Estimates from the Last Approval?

	There is an increase of 2292 hours in the total estimated respondent
burden compared with that identified in the ICR currently approved by
OMB. This increase reflects the need to collect information on project
performance and outcomes in the form of quarterly reporting and final
project reporting for current and future projects that is not addressed
in other ICRs.

What is the Next Step in the Process for this ICR?

	EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate.  The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12.  At that time, EPA will
issue another Federal Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv)
to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to
submit

additional comments to OMB.  If you have any questions about this ICR or
the approval process, please contact the technical person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

Dated: ________________

___________________________________

Elizabeth A. Shaw

Director, Office of Environmental Policy Innovation  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1

BILLING CODE 6560-50

Page   PAGE  1  of   NUMPAGES  9