[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 223 (Thursday, November 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72457-72458]
[FR Doc No: 2015-29491]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-76439; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2015-112]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE
Arca Options Fee Schedule Effective December 1, 2015

November 13, 2015.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on November 9, 2015, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule
(``Fee Schedule''). The Exchange proposes to implement the fee changes
effective December 1, 2015. The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this filing is to amend the Fee Schedule, effective
December 1, 2015. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to decrease
certain fees charged to Market Makers, Lead Market Makers, Firms and
Broker Dealers, and Professional Customers (collectively, ``Non-
Customers'') for Taking Liquidity in Penny Pilot Issues (``Take
Fees''). Last month the Exchange increased the Take Fees charged to
Non-Customers from $0.50 to $0.52 per contract for electronic
executions.\4\ The Exchange now proposes to reduce the Take Fees
charged to Non-Customers back to $0.50 per contract after having
considered the competitive landscape.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See File No. SR-NYSEArca-2015-108 (November 2, 2015).
    \5\ See e.g., NASDAQ Options Market--Fees and Rebates, available
at: http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Micro.aspx?id=optionsPricing
(charging non-customers take fees of $0.50 per contract in penny
pilot issues other than in certain select symbols, for which the
take fee is $0.55). See also MIAX fee schedule, available here:
https://www.miaxoptions.com/sites/default/files/MIAX_Options_Fee_Schedule_10012015C.pdf (charging non-customers take
fees of $0.47 per contract in penny pilot issues other than in
certain select symbols, for which the take fee is $0.55). The
Commission notes that the $0.55 take fee applies only to certain
categories of non-customers (i.e. away market makers).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\6\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\7\ in particular,
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and

other charges among its members, issuers and other persons using its
facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers,
issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed Take Fees for Non-Customers
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because they are
competitive with fees charged by other exchanges and are designed to
attract (and compete for) order flow to the Exchange, which provides a
greater opportunity for trading by all market participants.\8\
Moreover, the Exchange believes the proposed change does not unfairly
discriminate because it applies equally to all Non-Customers who are
removing liquidity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See supra n. 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is
consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\9\ the Exchange does
not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Instead, the Exchange believes that the proposed change would
continue to encourage competition and make the Exchange a more
competitive venue for, among other things, order execution and price
discovery. In addition, the proposed change would impact all affected
order types (i.e., Professional Customers, Firm, Broker Dealers) in
issues at the same rate. The Exchange does not believe that the
proposed change will impair the ability of any market participants or
competing order execution venues to maintain their competitive standing
in the financial markets.
    The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can readily favor competing venues. In
such an environment, the Exchange must continually review, and consider
adjusting, its fees and credits to remain competitive with other
exchanges. For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change reflects this competitive environment.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \10\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \11\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \12\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2015-112 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2015-112. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. Copies of the filing will also be
available for inspection and copying at the NYSE's principal office and
on its Internet Web site at www.nyse.com. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2015-112 and should be
submitted on or before December 10, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2015-29491 Filed 11-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 60833]
[FR Doc No: 2018-25782]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER19-367-000]

Pixelle Specialty Solutions LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Pixelle Specialty Solutions LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is December 10, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
[email protected]. or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 20, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-25782 Filed 11-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 193 (Friday, October 8, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 56205]
[FR Doc No: 2021-22001]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2021-077]

Safety Zone; Monte Foundation Fireworks, Capitola Pier, Capitola,
CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Notification of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone for the Monte
Foundation Fireworks Display in the Captain of the Port, San Francisco
area of responsibility during the dates and times noted below. This
action is necessary to protect life and property of the maritime public
from the hazards associated with the fireworks display. During the
enforcement period, unauthorized persons or vessels are prohibited from
entering into, transiting through, or anchoring in the safety zone,
unless authorized by the Patrol Commander (PATCOM) or other Federal,
state, or local law enforcement agencies on scene to assist the Coast
Guard in enforcing the regulated area.

DATES: The regulation in 33 CFR 165.1191, will be enforced for the
location in Table 1 to Sec.  165.1191, Item number 22, from 8:00 p.m.
to 8:20 p.m. on October 10, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notification of enforcement, call or email Lieutenant Anthony Solares,
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Francisco; telephone
(415) 399-3585, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone
established in 33 CFR 165.1191, Table 1, Item number 22, for the Monte
Foundation Fireworks Display from 8:00 p.m. to 8:20 p.m. on October 10,
2021. The Captain of the Port has delegated the authority to issue the
notification of enforcement for this regulation to the Prevention
Department Head.
    The safety zone will extend to all navigable waters around the
land-based launch site at the Capitola Pier in Capitola, CA. During the
20-minute fireworks display, scheduled to begin at approximately 8:00
p.m. on October 10, 2021, the safety zone will encompass navigable
waters around and under the fireworks launch site within a radius of
1,000 feet in approximate position 36[deg]58'10'' N, 121[deg]57'12'' W
(NAD 83) for the Monte Foundation Fireworks Display.
    This safety zone will be enforced from 8:00 p.m. until 8:20 p.m. on
October 10, 2021, or as announced via Broadcast Notice to Mariners. In
addition to this notification of enforcement in the Federal Register,
the Coast Guard plans to provide notification of this enforcement
period via the Local Notice to Mariners.
    Under the provisions of 33 CFR 165.1191, unauthorized persons or
vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring in the safety zone during all applicable effective dates and
times, unless authorized to do so by the PATCOM or other Official
Patrol defined as a federal, state, or local law enforcement agency on
scene to assist the Coast Guard in enforcing the regulated area.
Additionally, each person who receives notice of a lawful order or
direction issued by the PATCOM or Official Patrol shall obey the order
or direction. The PATCOM or Official Patrol may, upon request, allow
the transit of commercial vessels through regulated areas when it is
safe to do so.
    If the Captain of the Port determines that the regulated area need
not be enforced for the full duration stated in this notification, a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners may be used to grant general permission to
enter the regulated area.

    Dated: October 4, 2021.
Hale A. Allegretti,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Prevention Department Head, Sector San
Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2021-22001 Filed 10-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 42101]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17451]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9926-11-OEI]

Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision
Approval, State of Vermont

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA's approval of the State of Vermont's
request to revise/modify certain of its EPA-authorized programs to
allow electronic reporting.

DATES: EPA's approval is effective July 16, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Seeh, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Mail Stop
2823T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566-
1175<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media
Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR) was published in the Federal
Register (70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of title 40 of the CFR.
CROMERR establishes electronic reporting as an acceptable regulatory
alternative to paper reporting and establishes requirements to assure
that electronic documents are as legally dependable as their paper
counterparts. Subpart D of CROMERR requires that state, tribal or local
government agencies that receive, or wish to begin receiving,
electronic reports under their EPA-authorized programs must apply to
EPA for a revision or modification of those programs and obtain EPA
approval. Subpart D provides standards for such approvals based on
consideration of the electronic document receiving systems that the
state, tribe, or local government will use to implement the electronic
reporting. Additionally, Sec.  3.1000(b) through (e) of 40 CFR part 3,
subpart D provides special procedures for program revisions and
modifications to allow electronic reporting, to be used at the option
of the state, tribe or local government in place of procedures
available under existing program-specific authorization regulations. An
application submitted under the subpart D procedures must show that the
state, tribe or local government has sufficient legal authority to
implement the electronic reporting components of the programs covered
by the application and will use electronic document receiving systems
that meet the applicable subpart D requirements. Once an authorized
program has EPA's approval to accept electronic documents under certain
programs, CROMERR Sec.  3.1000(a)(4) requires that the program keep EPA
apprised of any changes to laws, policies, or the electronic document
receiving systems that have the potential to affect the program's
compliance with CROMERR Sec.  3.2000.
    On December 5, 2011, the Vermont Department of Environmental
Conservation (VT DEC) submitted an amended application titled ``Online
Report Submittal System'' for revisions/modifications of its EPA-
authorized programs under title 40 CFR to allow new electronic
reporting. EPA reviewed VT DEC's request to revise/modify its EPA-
authorized programs and, based on this review, EPA determined that the
application met the standards for approval of authorized program
revisions/modifications set out in 40 CFR part 3, subpart D. In
accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(d), this notice of EPA's decision to
approve Vermont's request to revise/modify its following EPA-authorized
programs to allow electronic reporting under 40 CFR parts 122, 280, and
281, is being published in the Federal Register: Part 123--EPA
Administered Permit Programs: The National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System; and Part 282--Approved Underground Storage Tank
Programs.
    VT DEC was notified of EPA's determination to approve its
application with respect to the authorized programs listed above.

Matthew Leopard,
Director, Office of Information Collection.
[FR Doc. 2015-17451 Filed 7-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 80 (Friday, April 24, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 23133]
[FR Doc No: 2020-08674]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision (ROD) Written
Re-Evaluation (WR) of Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for
the Proposed Airport, Angoon, Alaska

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

ACTION: Notice of availability (NOA); record of decision (ROD).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations, the FAA
issues this notice to advise the public that the FAA has issued the ROD
of the WR of the FEIS for the proposed airport in Angoon, Alaska. The
ROD constitutes the final decision of the FAA and summarizes the WR of
FEIS analyses and selected mitigation measures.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    In the ROD, the FAA selected the following realignment for
implementation:
    Airport 12A-Echo, which involves the construction of a land-based
airport consisting of a paved, 3,300-foot-long and 75-foot-wide runway
and associated access road. The project will be located on lands owned
or managed by private landowners; Kootznoowoo, Inc.; and the City of
Angoon.
    The FAA has included determinations on the project based upon
evidence set forth in the WR, FEIS, public input, and the supporting
administrative record. http://dot.alaska.gov/sereg/projects/angoon_airport_new/index.shtml.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the WR are available at the following locations.
While restrictions on in-person interactions are in place due to COVID-
19, online access to the WR is encouraged:

1. Online at http://dot.alaska.gov/sereg/projects/angoon_airport_new/index.shtml.
2. Juneau Public Library
     Downtown Branch, 292 Marine Way, Juneau, AK 99801
     Douglas Branch, 1016 3rd Street, Douglas, AK 99824
     Mendenhall Mall Branch, 9109 Mendenhall Mall Rd, Juneau,
AK 99801
3. Angoon Community Association Building, 315 Heendae Rd, Angoon, AK
99820
4. Angoon City Government Office, 700 Aan Deina Aat Street, Angoon, AK
99820
5. The FAA, Airports Division. Please contact Venus Larson at (907)
271-3813 for a copy or access online at https://www.faa.gov/airports/alaskan/environmental/.
6. ADOT Southcoast
     Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     U.S. Mail: Chris Goins, PE, Project Manager, DOT&PF
Southcoast Region, P.O. Box 112506, Juneau, AK 99811-2506.
     Phone: Contact Chris Goins, PE at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Venus Larson, AAL-624, Federal
Aviation Administration, Alaskan Region, Airports Division, 222 W. 7th
Avenue Box #14, Anchorage, AK 99513. Ms. Larson may be contacted during
business hours at<PHONE_NUMBER> (telephone) and<PHONE_NUMBER> (fax),
or by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Kristi A. Warden,
Director, Alaskan Region Airports Division, AAL-600.
[FR Doc. 2020-08674 Filed 4-23-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: May 19, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 95)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 23305-23307]
[DOCID:fr19my09-2]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-1245; Directorate Identifier 2008-NE-27-AD;
Amendment 39-15912; AD 2009-11-02]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; CFM International S.A. Model CFM56
Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for CFM
International S.A. CFM56-2, CFM56-3, CFM56-5A, CFM56-5B, CFM56-5C, and
CFM56-7B series turbofan engines with certain part number (P/N) and
serial number (SN) high-pressure compressor (HPC) 4-9 spools installed.
This AD requires removing certain HPC 4-9 spools listed by P/N and SN
in this AD. This AD results from reports of certain HPC 4-9 spools that
Propulsion Technology LLC (PTLLC) improperly repaired and returned to
service. We are issuing this AD to prevent cracking of the HPC 4-9
spool, which could result in possible uncontained failure of the spool
and damage to the airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective June 23, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The Docket Operations office is located at Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-
0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen K. Sheely, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39
with a proposed AD. The proposed AD applies to CFM International S.A.
CFM56-2, CFM56-3, CFM56-5A, CFM56-5B, CFM56-5C, and CFM56-7B series
turbofan engines with certain P/N and SN HPC 4-9 spools installed. We
published the proposed AD in the Federal Register on November 26, 2008
(73 FR 71951). That action proposed to require removing certain HPC 4-9
spools that have a P/N and SN listed in Table 1 of this AD before
accumulating 8,900 cycles since repair at PTLLC or within 1,100 cycles
from the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is provided in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

Comments

    We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the comments received.

Incorrect SN in Table 1 of the Proposed AD

    Three commenters, the Air Transport Association (ATA), United
Airlines, and CFM International, point out a typographical error in the
SN for a 4-9 spool, P/N 1590M29G01. They state that the Special
Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB) NE-08-17 shows SN GWNFY924
for that P/N and the proposed rule shows SN GWNFY824 for the same P/N.
    We agree. Serial number GWNFY924 is the correct SN. We changed
Table 1, P/N 1590M29G01 SN ``GWNFY824,'' to ``GWNFY924'' in this AD.

Request To Clarify the Relationship Between SAIB NE-08-17 and the
Proposed AD

    One commenter, the ATA, suggests the proposed AD doesn't show a
clear relationship between its requirements and those contained in SAIB
NE-08-17. The ATA suggests we provide a clarification and a better
understanding of why we wrote SAIB NE-08-17 and the proposed rule. The
ATA also asks if the recommendations or the hardware listed in SAIB NE-
08-17 is still in effect.
    We partially agree. The proposed AD specifies the same twenty-six
4-9 spools as SAIB NE-08-17. Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin
NE-08-17 still provides recommendations for dispositioning other parts
listed in that SAIB. However, we don't require removing the hardware
listed in SAIB NE-08-17, other than the 4-9 spools. We didn't change
the AD.

Request To Delete ``Seal Tooth Plasma Overspray'' Statement From
Discussion

    One commenter, CFM International, asks us to delete ``Seal tooth
plasma overspray between the seal teeth, which is not permitted by the
engine overhaul manual, and'' from the Discussion Section. CFM
International states that the overhaul manual does allow plasma
overspray between the seal teeth.
    We agree that the overhaul manual allows plasma overspray between
the seal teeth. However, the Discussion Section is not included in the
AD. We didn't change the AD.

Request To Include Instructions for Dispositioning the Removed 4-9
Spool

    One commenter, Japan Airlines, states that we include a prohibition
for installing the affected 4-9 spools, but we don't specify what to do
with the 4-9 spools removed as specified in the proposed AD. They ask
us to provide instructions to disposition the removed 4-9 spools.
    We don't agree. The proposed rule requires removing from service,
certain 4-9 spools, which removes the unsafe condition. The included
installation prohibition resolves our remaining regulatory concerns.
How operators recycle metal is beyond the scope of an AD, so long as
the excluded part doesn't find its way back into service. We didn't
change the AD.

Request To Clarify the Compliance Times

    One commenter, the Boeing Company, asks us to clarify the
compliance times for removing the affected 4-9 spools. Boeing suggests
that, as written, the compliance times of ``before accumulating 8,900
cycles-since-repair at PTLLC or within 1,100 cycles after the effective
date of this AD,'' could allow up to 10,000 cycles to accumulate on an
engine before an operator has to take corrective action.
    We agree. That is what we intended. We didn't change the AD.

Conclusion

    We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comments received, and determined that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously.
We have determined that these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 26 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take about
410 work-hours per engine to perform the required actions, and that the
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about
$227,500 per engine. Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost
of the AD to U.S. operators to be $6,767,800.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD and
placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary at the
address listed under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2009-11-02 CFM International S.A.: Amendment 39-15912. Docket No.
FAA-2008-1245; Directorate Identifier 2008-NE-27-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective June 23,
2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to CFM International S.A. CFM56-2, CFM56-3,
CFM56-5A, CFM56-5B, CFM56-5C, and CFM56-7B series turbofan engines
with a high-pressure compressor (HPC) 4-9 spool that has a part
number (P/N) and serial number (SN) specified in Table 1 of this AD,
installed. These engines are installed on, but not limited to,
Airbus A319, A320, and A340 airplanes and Boeing 737 airplanes.

                  Table 1--HPC 4-9 Spools by P/N and SN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             HPC 4-9 spool P/N                    HPC 4-9 spool SN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
9513M93G08................................  MPON1641
1590M29G01................................  GWN0087D
1590M29G01................................  GWN00MG2
1590M29G01................................  GWN011LG
1590M29G01................................  GWN01285
1590M29G01................................  GWN021JC
1590M29G01................................  GWNFY923
1590M29G01................................  GWNFY924
1590M29G01................................  GWNPA756
1590M29G01................................  GWNPG015
1590M29G01................................  GWNWC515
1590M29G01................................  GWNWR523
1590M29G01................................  GWNWT631
1590M29G01................................  GWNYC495
1588M89G03................................  GWN03K1R
1588M89G03................................  GWN03N61
1588M89G03................................  GWN03N6C
1588M89G03................................  GWN040L9
1588M89G03................................  GWN0468N
1588M89G03................................  GWN05AMO
1277M97G02................................  GWNE1298
1277M97G02................................  GWNE1564
1277M97G02................................  GWNJ7891
1277M97G02................................  GWNT4187
9513M93G11................................  GWNB3373
1358M94G01................................  GWNU0169
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from reports of certain HPC 4-9 spools that
Propulsion Technology LLC (PTLLC) improperly repaired and returned
to service. We are issuing this AD to prevent cracking of the HPC 4-
9 spool, which could result in possible uncontained

failure of the spool and damage to the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.

Removing the HPC 4-9 Spool

    (f) Remove HPC 4-9 spools from service that have a P/N and S/N
listed in Table 1 of this AD before accumulating 8,900 cycles-since-
repair at PTLLC or within 1,100 cycles from the effective date of
this AD, which ever occurs later.

Installation Prohibition

    (g) After the effective date of this AD, do not install any
engine with an HPC 4-9 spool that has a P/N and SN specified in
Table 1 of this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance

    (h) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, has the authority
to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.

Related Information

    (i) Contact Stephen K. Sheely, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (781) 238-
7199, for more information about this AD.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (j) None.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on May 13, 2009.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9-11554 Filed 5-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 14 (Wednesday, January 22, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3548-3550]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00508]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 64

[Docket ID FEMA-2020-0005; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-8613]

Suspension of Community Eligibility

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule identifies communities where the sale of flood
insurance has been authorized under the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP) that are scheduled for suspension on the effective dates
listed within this rule because of noncompliance with the floodplain
management requirements of the program. If the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) receives documentation that the community has
adopted the required floodplain management measures prior to the
effective suspension date given in this rule, the suspension will not
occur and a notice of this will be provided by publication in the
Federal Register on a subsequent date. Also, information identifying
the current participation status of a community can be obtained from
FEMA's Community Status Book (CSB). The CSB is available at https://www.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program-community-status-book.

EFFECTIVE DATES: The effective date of each community's scheduled
suspension is the third date (``Susp.'') listed in the third column of
the following tables.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: If you want to determine whether a particular
community was suspended on the suspension date or for further
information, contact Adrienne L. Sheldon, PE, CFM, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 400
C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP enables property owners to purchase
Federal flood insurance that is not otherwise generally available from
private insurers. In return, communities agree to adopt and administer
local floodplain management measures aimed at protecting lives and new
construction from future flooding. Section 1315 of the National Flood
Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4022, prohibits the sale
of NFIP flood insurance unless an appropriate public body adopts
adequate floodplain management measures with effective enforcement
measures. The communities listed in this document no longer meet that
statutory requirement for compliance with program regulations, 44 CFR
part 59. Accordingly, the communities will be suspended on the
effective date in the third column. As of that date, flood insurance
will no longer be available in the community. We recognize that some of
these communities may adopt and submit the required documentation of
legally enforceable floodplain management measures after this rule is
published but prior to the actual suspension date. These communities
will not be suspended and will continue to be eligible for the sale of
NFIP flood insurance. A notice withdrawing the suspension of such
communities will be published in the Federal Register.
    In addition, FEMA publishes a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) that
identifies the Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) in these communities.
The date of the FIRM, if one has been published, is indicated in the
fourth column of the table. No direct Federal financial assistance
(except assistance pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act not in connection with a flood) may be
provided for construction or acquisition of buildings in identified
SFHAs for communities not participating in the NFIP and identified for
more than a year on FEMA's initial FIRM for the community as having
flood-prone areas (section 202(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act
of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4106(a), as amended). This prohibition against
certain types of Federal assistance becomes effective for the
communities listed on the date shown in the last column. The
Administrator finds that notice and public comment procedures under 5
U.S.C. 553(b), are impracticable and unnecessary because communities
listed in this final rule have been adequately notified.
    Each community receives 6-month, 90-day, and 30-day notification
letters addressed to the Chief Executive Officer stating that the
community will be suspended unless the required floodplain management
measures are met prior to the effective suspension date. Since these
notifications were made, this final rule may take effect within less
than 30 days.
    National Environmental Policy Act. FEMA has determined that the
community suspension(s) included in this rule is a non-discretionary
action and therefore the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) does not apply.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. The Administrator has determined that
this rule is exempt from the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act because the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended,
Section 1315, 42 U.S.C. 4022, prohibits flood insurance coverage unless
an appropriate public body adopts adequate floodplain management
measures with effective enforcement measures. The communities listed no
longer comply with the statutory requirements, and after the effective
date, flood insurance will no longer be available in the communities
unless remedial action takes place.
    Regulatory Classification. This final rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the criteria of section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 of September 30, 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR
51735.
    Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This rule involves no policies
that have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
    Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule meets the
applicable standards of Executive Order 12988.
    Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule does not involve any collection
of information for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 64

    Flood insurance, Floodplains.

    Accordingly, 44 CFR part 64 is amended as follows:

PART 64--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for Part 64 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp.; p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR,
1979 Comp.; p. 376.

Sec.  64.6  [Amended]

0
2. The tables published under the authority of Sec.  64.6 are amended
as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Effective date
                                             authorization/
                                Community   cancellation  of   Current effective  map     Date certain  Federal
      State and location           No.        sale of flood             date              assistance no longer
                                              insurance in                                 available in SFHAs
                                                community
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Region VI

Texas:
    Bee Cave, City of, Travis       481610  N/A, Emerg;       January 22, 2020........  January 22, 2020.
     County.                                 April 12, 1988,
                                             Reg; January
                                             22, 2020, Susp.
    Creedmoor, City of,             481697  N/A, Emerg; July  .....do.................   Do.
     Travis County.                          20, 2018, Reg;
                                             January 22,
                                             2020, Susp.
    Gonzales, City of,              480254  August 6, 1975,   .....do.................   Do.
     Gonzales County.                        Emerg; June 15,
                                             1979, Reg;
                                             January 22,
                                             2020, Susp.
    Gonzales County,                480253  November 8,       .....do.................   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                   1973, Emerg;
                                             August 15,
                                             1978, Reg;
                                             January 22,
                                             2020, Susp.
    Lakeway, City of, Travis        481303  June 27, 1977,    .....do.................   Do.
     County.                                 Emerg; November
                                             5, 1980, Reg;
                                             January 22,
                                             2020, Susp.
    Mustang Ridge, City of,         481687  N/A, Emerg; June  .....do.................   Do.
     Caldwell and Travis                     15, 2000, Reg;
     Counties.                               January 22,
                                             2020, Susp.
    Point Venture, Village          481691  N/A, Emerg; May   .....do.................   Do.
     of, Travis County.                      29, 2002, Reg;
                                             January 22,
                                             2020, Susp.
    Rollingwood, City of,           481029  February 3,       .....do.................   Do.
     Travis County.                          1975, Emerg;
                                             September 29,
                                             1978, Reg;
                                             January 22,
                                             2020, Susp.

    San Leanna, Village of,         481305  N/A, Emerg;       .....do.................   Do.
     Travis County.                          March 11, 1980,
                                             Reg; January
                                             22, 2020, Susp.
    The Hills, Village of,          480063  N/A, Emerg;       .....do.................   Do.
     Travis County.                          November 15,
                                             2006, Reg;
                                             January 22,
                                             2020, Susp.
    Volente, Village of,            481696  N/A, Emerg;       .....do.................   Do.
     Travis County.                          April 15, 2004,
                                             Reg; January
                                             22, 2020, Susp.
    West Lake Hills, City of,       481030  March 10, 1976,   .....do.................   Do.
     Travis County.                          Emerg; July 17,
                                             1978, Reg;
                                             January 22,
                                             2020, Susp.

          Region VII

Kansas: Butler County,              200037  June 23, 1975,    ......do................   Do.
 Unincorporated Areas.                       Emerg; March 2,
                                             1981, Reg;
                                             January 22,
                                             2020, Susp.
Missouri: Maryville, City of,       290264  March 7, 1975,    January 22, 2020........  January 22, 2020.
 Nodaway County.                             Emerg;
                                             September 18,
                                             1985, Reg;
                                             January 22,
                                             2020, Susp.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* ......do =Ditto.
Code for reading third column: Emerg. --Emergency; Reg. --Regular; Susp. --Suspension.

    Dated: January 6, 2020.
Eric Letvin,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Mitigation, Federal Insurance and
Mitigation Administration--FEMA Resilience, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-00508 Filed 1-21-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 199 (Monday, October 15, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 62466-62468]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25253]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 199 / Monday, October 15, 2012 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0946; Directorate Identifier 2012-CE-037-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; GA200 (Pty) Ltd Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
GA200 (Pty) Ltd Models GA200 and GA200C airplanes that would revise an
existing AD. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as failure of
the wing strut bolt through the main spar. We are issuing this proposed
AD to require actions to address the unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 29,
2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
GippsAero, P.O. Box 881, Morwell, Victoria 3840, Australia, telephone:
+ 61 (0) 3 5172 1200; fax + 61 (0) 3 5172 1201; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: www.gippsaero.com. You may review
copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0946;
Directorate Identifier 2012-CE-037-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On August 31, 2012, we issued AD 2012-18-10, Amendment 39-17187 (77
FR 55686, September 11, 2012). That AD required actions intended to
address an unsafe condition on the products listed above.
    Since we issued AD 2012-18-10, Amendment 39-17187 (77 FR 55686,
September 11, 2012), the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), which
is the aviation authority for the Commonwealth of Australia, has issued
AD AD/GA200/1, Amendment 1, dated September 21, 2012 (referred to after
this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:

    As a result of a reported case of failure of a strut on a GA200C
aircraft, GippsAero has issued a mandatory service bulletin to alert
operators and maintenance organisations and to provide inspection
and rectification actions.
    This Airworthiness Directive makes this inspection and
rectification action mandatory. Failure to complete the actions
required by this service bulletin may result in wing strut bolt
failure, resulting in wing structural failure.
    Amendment 1 is issued to revise the repeat inspection compliance
time to 500 hours (previously 100 hours). The requirement service
bulletin is also revised to provide a corrective action if the
inboard (upper) strut fitting hole is found to be larger than
specified. The initial inspection compliance time of 10 hours
remains unchanged.

    This proposed AD would retain the actions required in AD 2012-18-
10, Amendment 39-17187 (77 FR 55686, September 11, 2012), change the
compliance time for the repetitive inspections, and incorporate the
revised service bulletin. You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    GippsAero has issued Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA200-2012-08,
Issue 2, dated September 4, 2012. The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in
the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another

country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 3 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 2 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $510, or $170 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 2 work-hours and require parts costing $400, for a cost of
$570 per product. We have no way of determining the number of products
that may need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-17187 (77 FR
55686, September 11, 2012), and adding the following new AD:

    GA200 (Pty) Ltd: Docket No. FAA-2012-0946; Directorate
Identifier 2012-CE-037-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by November 29, 2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD revises AD 2012-18-10, Amendment 39-17187 (77 FR 55686,
September 11, 2012).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to GA200 (Pty) Ltd Models GA200 and GA200C
airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 57: Wings.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) issued by the aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as failure of the
wing strut bolt through the main spar. We are issuing this AD to
prevent failure of the wing strut bolt, which could result in wing
failure.

(f) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Within 10 hours time-in-service (TIS) after September 14,
2012 (the effective date retained from AD 2012-18-10, Amendment 39-
17187 (77 FR 55686, September 11, 2012)), inspect the inboard strut
fitting following GippsAero Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA200-
2012-08, Issue 1, dated August 22, 2012; or GippsAero Mandatory
Service Bulletin SB-GA200-2012-08, Issue 2, dated September 4, 2012.
Repetitively thereafter inspect at intervals not to exceed 500 hours
TIS following GippsAero Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA200-2012-08,
Issue 2, dated September 4, 2012.
    (2) If the 100-hour TIS repetitive inspection previously
required in AD 2012-18-10, Amendment 39-17187 (77 FR 55686,
September 11, 2012) has already been done before the effective date
of this AD following GippsAero Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA200-
2012-08, Issue 1, dated August 22, 2012, the next required
inspections are due at intervals not to exceed 500 hours TIS after
the last inspection following GippsAero Mandatory Service Bulletin
SB-GA200-2012-08, Issue 2, dated September 4, 2012.
    (3) If any discrepancies are found during any of the inspections
required by paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this AD, before further
flight after the inspection in which the discrepancy is found, take
all necessary corrective actions following GippsAero Mandatory
Service Bulletin SB-GA200-2012-08, Issue 1, dated August 22, 2012;
or GippsAero Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA200-2012-08, Issue 2,
dated September 4, 2012.

(g) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal
inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that

collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

(h) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) AD AD/
GA200/1, Amendment 1, dated September 21, 2012; GippsAero Mandatory
Service Bulletin SB-GA200-2012-08, Issue 1, dated August 22, 2012;
and GippsAero Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA200-2012-08, Issue 2,
dated September 4, 2012, for related information. For service
information related to this AD, contact GippsAero, P.O. Box 881,
Morwell, Victoria 3840, Australia, telephone: + 61 (0) 3 5172 1200;
fax + 61 (0) 3 5172 1201; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet:
www.gippsaero.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on October 9, 2012.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-25253 Filed 10-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P