[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 37 (Monday, February 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 12750]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04275]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL13-47-000]

FirstEnergy Solutions Corp., Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC
v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; Notice of Complaint

    Take notice that on February 15, 2013, pursuant to section 206 of
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206 and sections 206 and 306 of the
Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824(e) and 825(e), FirstEnergy Solutions
Corp. and Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC (Complainants) filed a
formal complaint against PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (Respondent)
alleging that, the provisions of the Respondent's Open Access
Transmission Tariff and Operating Agreement as related to the rules
governing the funding of Financial Transmission Rights are unjust,
unreasonable, unduly discriminatory and preferential.
    Complainants certify that copies of the complaint were served on
the contact of the Respondent as listed on the Commission's list of
Corporate Officials.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on March 7, 2013.

    Dated: February 19, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-04275 Filed 2-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: July 13, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 134)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 39603-39604]
[DOCID:fr13jy06-37]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

18 CFR Parts 366, 367, 368, 369 and 375

[Docket No. RM06-11-000]

Financial Accounting, Reporting and Records Retention
Requirements Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005

Issued June 30, 2006.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Notice of agenda, panelists and
questions for July 18, 2006 Technical Conference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 21, 2006, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the above-docketed proceeding
concerning Financial Accounting, Reporting and Records Retention
Requirements Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005, 71
FR 28464, May 16, 2006. The Commission is convening a technical
conference on July 18, 2006, to identify issues associated with the
proposed Uniform System of Accounts for Centralized Service Companies,
the proposed records retention requirements for holding companies and
service companies, and the Revised Form 60. By this notice, the
Commission is providing the agenda, panelists and a list of questions
that will be addressed by the panelists at this conference.

DATES: Conference will be held on July 18, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia A. Lake (Legal Information),
Office of the General Counsel--Energy Markets, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice of Agenda, Panelists and Questions

    As announced on April 21 and June 16, 2006, the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission) will hold a technical conference and
workshop in

the above-referenced proceeding on July 18, 2006, in the Commission
Meeting Room. The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. (Eastern Daylight
Savings Time) and conclude at approximately 1:30 p.m. All interested
persons are invited to attend. There is no registration fee to attend
this conference.
    Nine comments were filed in response to the proposed Uniform System
of Accounts for Centralized Service Companies, the proposed records
retention requirements for holding companies and service companies, and
the revised FERC Form No. 60.\1\ These comments raise a number of
issues. We request that the panel members address the following issues
raised by commentors:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Financial Accounting, Reporting and Records Retention
Requirements under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005,
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 71 FR 28464 (May 16, 2006), FERC
Statutes and Regulations ] 32,600 (2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. Is a separate Uniform System of Accounts necessary for service
companies?
    2. Are the proposed accounting and reports too burdensome to comply
with? What parts cause the most burden?
    3. Should a structured reporting format be required for service
companies?
    4. If a separate Uniform System of Accounts and structured reports
are adopted, what are the most significant modifications to what was
proposed in the NOPR that should be considered?
    5. What should the effective date be for the new requirements?
    Transcripts of the meeting will be available immediately for a fee
from Ace Reporting Company ((202) 347-3700 or 1-(800) 336-6646). They
will be available for free on the Commission's eLibrary system and on
the events calendar about two weeks after the conference. There will be
open microphones for conference attendees to present their questions to
the panelists and Commission staff.
    FERC conferences and meetings are accessible under section 508 of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations,
please send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll free (866)
208-3372 (voice) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY), or send a fax to (202) 208-
2106 with the required accommodations.
    Attached is the agenda, including the panelists who will speak at
the conference.
    Questions about the conference should be directed to: Julia A.
Lake, Office of the General Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. (202) 502-
8370<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.

Agenda for Financial Accounting, Reporting and Records Retention
Requirements Under PUHCA 2005 Technical Conference--July 18, 2006

9-9:10 a.m. Introductory Remarks by Susan Court, Director, Office of
Enforcement (OE).
9:10-9:20 a.m. Overview by Janice Garrison Nicholas, Director, Division
of Financial Regulation, Office of Enforcement.
9:15-11 a.m. Association and Industry Panel.

Panelists:
    --Henri Bartholomot--Director, Regulatory Legal Issues, Edison
Electric Institute.
    --David Stringfellow--Director of Accounting, Edison Electric
Institute.
    --Kathleen McNulty-Kropp--Manager, Regulatory Accounting Policy and
Reporting, Xcel Energy Inc. for Edison Electric Institute-William
Richert--Assistant Controller, National Grid USA.
    --Sandra Bennett--Assistant Controller, American Electric Power,
Inc.
    --Beverly M. Holmes--Director of Accounting, Southern Company
Services, Inc.

11-11:15 a.m. Break.
11:15 a.m.-1 p.m. State Commissions and Other Interest Groups Panel.
Panelists:
    --Thomas J. Ferris--Audit Manager-Consultant, Gas and Energy
Division, Public Service Commission of Wisconsin.
    --Joseph Buckley--Utility Specialist, Public Utilities Commission
of Ohio.
    --James Mitchell--Supervisor, Utility, Accounting and Finance, New
York State Public Service Commission.
    --Steven Ruppel--Contract Compliance Audit Manager, Florida
Municipal Power Agency.

1-1:15 p.m. Wrap up Questions and Answers.
1:15-1:30 p.m. Concluding Remarks.

[FR Doc. E6-11001 Filed 7-12-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<META name="generator" content="PDFCreactiveX HTML Export">
<META name="creation-date" content="08/10/2008 09:13:17 ">
<TITLE></TITLE>


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31707-31708]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12507]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG21-165-000.
    Applicants: Corazon Energy, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Corazon Energy, LLC.
    Filed Date: 6/8/21.
    Accession Number: 20210608-5163.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/29/21.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER21-169-001.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing--Amendment No. 1
to Partial Settlement in ER14-2850-006 et al. to be effective 1/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5091.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-625-003.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: NYISO supplemental notice of
delayed effective date--SENY reserve enhancements to be effective 6/17/
2021.
    Filed Date: 6/8/21.
    Accession Number: 20210608-5114.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/29/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1551-001.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2021-06-08 RA Enhancements Waiver
to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 6/8/21.
    Accession Number: 20210608-5135.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/29/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1579-001.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Progress, LLC, Duke Energy Florida, LLC,
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Response to Deficiency Letter
regarding Queue Reform to be effective 6/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/8/21.
    Accession Number: 20210608-5115.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/29/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1673-001.
    Applicants: Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Submission of Amendment to
Normalization Filing to be effective 6/12/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5074.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1744-001.
    Applicants: Brookfield Energy Marketing LP.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Supplement to Notice of Non-Material
Change in Status to be effective 4/24/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5077.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1745-001.
    Applicants: Brookfield Energy Marketing Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Supplement to Notice of Non-Material
Change in Status to be effective 4/24/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5076.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1746-001.
    Applicants: Brookfield Renewable Energy Marketing US.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Supplement to Notice of Non-Material
Change in Status to be effective 4/24/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5078.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1747-001.
    Applicants: Brookfield Renewable Trading and Marketing LP.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Supplement to Notice of Non-Material
Change in Status to be effective 4/24/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5079.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1748-001.
    Applicants: Horseshoe Bend Wind, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Supplement to Notice of Non-Material
Change in Status to be effective 4/24/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5080.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1749-001.
    Applicants: North Hurlburt Wind, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Supplement to Notice of Non-Material
Change in Status to be effective 4/24/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5082.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1750-001.
    Applicants: South Hurlburt Wind, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Supplement to Notice of Non-Material
Change in Status to be effective 4/24/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5083.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2100-000.
    Applicants: Point Beach Solar, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Point Beach Solar, LLC
Application for MBR Authority to be effective 7/20/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/8/21.
    Accession Number: 20210608-5137.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/29/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2101-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Electric Company.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Termination of Rate Schedule Nos.
114 and 117 to be effective 8/7/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/8/21.
    Accession Number: 20210608-5148.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/29/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2102-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original WMPA, Service
Agreement No. 6088; Queue No. AF1-209 to be effective 5/12/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5021.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2104-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 205 Operating agreement
between NYISO & LS Power, SA No. 2627 to be effective 5/18/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5054.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2105-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 205 filing of Operating
agreement between NYISO & NextEra, SA No. 2628 to be effective 5/25/
2021.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5059.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2106-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc., Niagara
Mohawk Power Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 205: Amended Restated LGIA
among NYISO, NMPC and Ball Hill, SA No. 2473 to be effective 5/27/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5072.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2107-000.
    Applicants: Florida Power & Light Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: FPL Certificate of
Concurrence with DEF

Rate Schedule No. 24 to be effective 8/8/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5081.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2108-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: City and County of San
Francisco Potrero TFA (SA 284) to be effective 6/10/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5090.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2109-000.
    Applicants: Wheatridge Solar Energy Center, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Wheatridge Solar Energy
Center, LLC Application for MBR Authority to be effective 8/9/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5093.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2110-000.
    Applicants: GenOn Power Midwest, LP.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of Rate
Schedule FERC No. 2 to be effective 9/15/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5104.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/21.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following qualifying
facility filings:

    Docket Numbers: QF21-980-000.
    Applicants: Running Foxes Petroleum Inc.
    Description: Form 556 of Running Foxes Petroleum Inc.
    Filed Date: 6/9/21.
    Accession Number: 20210609-5094.
    Comments Due: Non-Applicable.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: June 9, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-12507 Filed 6-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34876-34879]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14252]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0595; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-055-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 777 airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by reports of failure of wire support clamps in the forward
section of the aft pressure bulkhead. This proposed AD would require a
detailed inspection of the clamps on the power feeder cable auxiliary
power unit (APU) to determine if certain clamps are installed, and
related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. We are
proposing this AD to prevent failure of the clamp, which could result
in wire chafing and potential arcing and consequent fire in section 48
(a flammable fluid leakage zone) or heat damage to the APU power feeder
cable, insulation blankets, or pressure bulkhead.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 27, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box
3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Georgios Roussos, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0595;
Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-055-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We have received reports of failure of wire support clamps in the
forward section of the aft pressure bulkhead. This condition, if not
corrected, could result in wire chafing and potential arcing and
consequent fire in section 48 (a flammable fluid leakage zone) or heat
damage to the APU power feeder cable, insulation blankets, or pressure
bulkhead.

Relevant Service Information

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-24A0119, dated
November 11, 2011. The service information describes procedures for a
detailed inspection of the clamps on the APU power feeder cable to
determine if certain clamps are installed, and related investigative
and corrective actions if necessary.
    The related investigative actions include a general visual
inspection for damage of the APU power feeder cable and heat damage of
the insulation blanket adjacent to the clamp, a detailed inspection for
primer discoloration and structural deterioration of the fuselage
structure, and an eddy current inspection for heat damage of the
aluminum structure.
    The corrective actions include replacing the affected clamps,
repairing the APU power feeder cable, the installation blanket, and the
aluminum structure.

Clarification of Requirements

    Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-24A0119, dated November 11, 2011,
does not include a step for the corrective action if no damage is found
during the detailed inspection for primer discoloration and structural
deterioration of the section 47 and 48 fuselage structure. For the
corrective action, this AD requires repairing the APU power feeder
cable and insulation blanket and replacing the existing non-TA027063
clamps with TA027063 clamps, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-24A0119, dated
November 11, 2011.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously, except as discussed
under ``Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service
Information.''

Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service Information

    The service bulletin specifies to contact the manufacturer for
instructions on how to repair certain conditions, but this proposed AD
would require repairing those conditions in one of the following ways:
     In accordance with a method that we approve; or
     Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) whom we have
authorized to make those findings.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 164 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
               Action                        Labor cost           Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection and Clamp Replacement....  8 work-hours x $85 per             $500           $1,180         $193,520
                                       hour = $680.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repair that
would be required based on the results of the proposed inspection. We
have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need this
repair:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                  Action                                Labor cost                 Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection and Repair of the Pressure       48 work-hours x $85 per hour =                  $0           $4,080
 Bulkhead.                                   $4,080.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
parts cost estimates for the on-condition repairs specified in this
proposed AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2012-0595; Directorate Identifier
2012-NM-055-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by July 27, 2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 777-200, -200LR, -
300, -300ER, and 777F series airplanes; certificated in any
category; as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-
24A0119, dated November 11, 2011.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 2421; AC Generator/Alternator.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of failure of wire support
clamps in the forward section of the aft pressure bulkhead. We are
issuing this AD to prevent failure of the clamp, which could result
in wire chafing and potential arcing and consequent fire in section
48 (a flammable fluid leakage zone) or heat damage to the auxiliary
power unit (APU) power feeder cable, insulation blankets, or
pressure bulkhead.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Detailed Inspection of the Clamps

    Within 48 months after the effective date of this AD: Do a
detailed inspection of the clamps on the APU power feeder cable to
determine if TA027063 clamps are installed, and all applicable
related investigative and corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-
24A0119, dated November 11, 2011, except as required by paragraph
(h) and (i) of this AD. Do all related investigative and corrective
actions before further flight.

(h) Exception to the Service Bulletin

    If during any inspection of the fuselage structure required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, no primer discoloration or structural
deterioration is found, before further flight, repair the APU power
feeder cable and insulation blanket and replace the existing clamps,
in accordance with steps 3.B.7, 3.B.8, and 3.B.9 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-
24A0119, dated November 11, 2011.

(i) Repair Approval

    Where the service bulletin specifies to do the repair in
accordance to the instruction from Boeing, before further flight,
repair using a method approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any structural repair required by this AD if it is approved
by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a structural repair method to be
approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.

(k) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Georgios
Roussos, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S,
FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 31, 2012.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-14252 Filed 6-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 19, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2749-2751]
[FR Doc No: 2016-00863]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2015-1101]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; RICHLAND, Apra Harbor/Philippine Sea, GU

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary moving safety zone
for navigable waters within a 1000-yards ahead of the Dry-Dock RICHLAND
and its towing vessel and 500 yards abeam and 500 yards astern of the
dry-dock. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and
the marine environment from potential hazards created by the movement
of the drydock from Guam waters. Entry of vessels or persons into this
zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the
Port Guam.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from January 19,
2016

through 6:00 p.m. January 31, 2016. For the purposes of enforcement,
actual notice will be used from 8:00 a.m. December 30, 2015 through
January 19, 2016.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2015-1101 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Chief Kristina Gauthier, Waterways Management Office,
Sector Guam, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable. The
final details for this removal of this dry-dock were not known to the
Coast Guard until there was insufficient time remaining before the
operation to publish an NPRM. Thus, delaying the effective date of this
rule to wait for a comment period to run would be impracticable because
it would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect vessels and
waterway users from the hazards associated with this operation.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making it effective less than 30 days after publication in
the Federal Register. For the same reasons discussed in the preceding
paragraph, waiting for a 30 day notice period to run would be
impracticable.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The Captain of the Port Guam (COTP) has determined that potential
hazards associated with the movement of the Dry-Dock RICHLAND starting
8:00 a.m. December 30, 2015 will be a safety concern for anyone within
1000-yards ahead of the Dry-Dock RICHLAND and its towing vessel and 500
yards abeam and 500 yards astern while transiting Guam waters. This
rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment in the navigable waters within the safety zone while the
Dry-Dock RICHLAND and its towing vessel are in transit in Guam waters.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone from 8:00 a.m. December 30,
2015 through 6:00 p.m. January 31, 2016. The safety zone will cover all
navigable waters within 1000 yards ahead of the Dry-Dock RICHLAND and
its towing vessel and 500 yards abeam and 500 yards astern while
transiting Guam waters. The duration of the zone is intended to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in these navigable
waters while the Dry-Dock RICHLAND and its towing vessel are in
transit. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits.
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, it has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the safety zone. Vessel traffic will be able
to safely transit around this safety zone during the majority of this
evolution which will impact a small designated area of Apra Harbor,
Guam and the Philippine Sea for less than 24 hours. The transit through
the mouth of the entrance to Apra Harbor will be the most restricted
portion due to the limited space for maneuvering. Moreover, the Coast
Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel
16 about the zone and the rule allows vessels to seek permission to
enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A. above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because
it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has
implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves a safety zone to be enforced for less than 24 hours that
will prohibit entry within 1000 yards ahead of the Dry-Dock RICHLAND
and its towing vessel and 500 yards abeam and 500 yards astern. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T14-1101 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.  T14-1101 Safety Zone; RICHLAND, Apra Harbor/Philippine Sea,
GU.

    (a) Location. The following areas, within the Guam Captain of the
Port (COTP) Zone (See 33 CFR 3.70-15), from the surface of the water to
the ocean floor, is a moving safety zone: All navigable waters within
1000 yards ahead of the Dry-Dock RICHLAND and its towing vessel and 500
yards abeam and 500 yards astern from departure from Wharf ``P'' to 12
miles from Orote Point, Guam.
    (b) Effective period. This section is effective from 8 a.m. on
December 30, 2015 through 6 p.m. on January 31, 2016.
    (c) Enforcement period. This section is enforced from the time the
vessel departs Wharf ``P'' until it is 12 miles from Orote Point, Guam.
    (d) Regulations. The general regulations governing safety zones
contained in Sec.  165.23 apply. No vessels may enter or transit the
safety zone unless authorized by the COTP or a designated
representative thereof.
    (e) Enforcement. Any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer, and any other COTP representative permitted by law, may
enforce these temporary safety zones.
    (f) Waiver. The COTP may waive any of the requirements of this
section for any person, vessel, or class of vessel upon finding that
application of the safety zone is unnecessary or impractical for the
purpose of maritime security.
    (g) Penalties. Vessels or persons violating this rule are subject
to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 192.

    Dated: December 23, 2015.
James B. Pruett,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Guam.
[FR Doc. 2016-00863 Filed 1-15-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P