[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5475-5476]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01987]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0952; FRL-9458-01-OCSPP]

Clothianidin; Receipt of Application for Emergency Exemption,
Solicitation of Public Comment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has received a specific exemption request from the Florida
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) to use the
insecticide clothianidin (CAS No. 210-880-92-5 as a soil drench
application to treat up to 125,376 acres of immature (3-5 years old)
citrus trees to control the transmission of Huanglongbing (HLB) disease
vectored by the Asian Citrus Psyllid (ACP). The applicant proposes a
use that has been requested in 5 or more previous years. Therefore, EPA
is soliciting public comment before making the decision whether or not
to grant the exemption.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 16, 2022.

ADDRESSES: The docket for these actions, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0952, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
    3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low-income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticide
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.

II. What action is the Agency taking?

    Under section 18 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136p), at the discretion of the EPA
Administrator, a Federal or State agency may be exempted from any
provision of FIFRA if the EPA Administrator determines that emergency
conditions exist which require the exemption. The FDACS has requested
the EPA Administrator to issue a specific exemption for the use of
clothianidin as a soil drench application on immature (3-5 years old)
citrus trees to control the transmission of HLB disease vectored by
ACP. Information in accordance with 40 CFR part 166 was submitted as
part of this request.
    As part of this request, the applicant asserts that clothianidin is
needed to suppress the transmission of HLB disease vectored by ACP due
to the lack of available alternative pesticides and effective control
practices. Without the use of this tool, Florida citrus growers are
expected to experience significant economic losses due to the severity
of this invasive disease and vector complex.
    The Applicant proposes to make no more than two applications of
clothianidin at a maximum rate of 0.4 lb. a.i./A (24.0 fl. oz per acre)
per 12-month period on up to 125,376 acres of immature (3-5 years old)
citrus trees grown in Florida from January 14 to October 31, 2022. A
total of 50,150 lbs. of clothianidin could be used on the maximum
acreage of 125,376 at the highest rate.
    This notice does not constitute a decision by EPA on the
application itself. The regulations governing FIFRA section 18 require
publication of a notice of receipt of an application for a specific
exemption proposing a use which is supported by the IR-4 program and
has been requested in 5 or more previous years; and for which a
complete application for registration of that use and/or a petition for
tolerance for residues in or on the commodity has not been submitted to
the Agency.
    The FDACS submitted in 2011 a petition for tolerance to EPA that
was subsequently withdrawn, and an application/petition has not been
resubmitted to the Agency. The notice provides an opportunity for
public comment on the application. The Agency will review and consider
all comments received during the comment period in determining whether
to issue the specific exemption requested by the FDACS.
    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: January 19, 2022.
Marietta Echeverria,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2022-01987 Filed 1-31-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65666-65667]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27762]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0578; FRL-9985-69]

Pesticide Product Registration; Receipt of Applications for New
Active Ingredients

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has received applications to register pesticide products
containing active ingredients not included in any currently registered
pesticide products. Pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), EPA is hereby providing notice of receipt and
opportunity to comment on these applications.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 22, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by the Docket
Identification (ID) Number and the File Symbol of interest as shown in
the body of this document, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460-0001; main telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.

II. Registration Applications

    EPA has received applications to register pesticide products
containing active ingredients not included in any currently registered
pesticide products. Pursuant to the provisions of FIFRA section 3(c)(4)
(7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(4)), EPA is hereby providing notice of receipt and
opportunity to comment on these applications. Notice of receipt of
these applications does not imply a decision by the Agency on these
applications.

III. New Active Ingredients

    1. File Symbol: 59639-EGE. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0038.
Applicant: Valent U.S.A. LLC, 1600 Riviera Avenue, Suite 200, Walnut
Creek, CA 94596. Product name: V-10417 FS Fungicide. Active ingredient:
Fungicide--Ethaboxam at 7.07%, metalaxyl 1.89%, Inpyrfluxam at 4.71%.
Proposed use: Seed treatment use on legume vegetable crop group 6,
except cowpea and field pea. Contact: RD.

    2. File Symbol: 59639-EGG. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0038.
Applicant: Valent U.S.A. LLC, 1600 Riviera Avenue, Suite 200, Walnut
Creek, CA 94596. Product name: S-2399 Technical Fungicide. Active
ingredient: Fungicide--Inpyrfluxam at 97.4%. Proposed uses: Apple, corn
(field, pop and sweet), peanut, rice, soybean and sugar beet. Seed
treatment uses on legume vegetable crop group 6, cereal grain crop
group 15, rapeseed crop subgroup 20A and sugar beet. Contact: RD.
    3. File Symbol: 59639-EGN. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0038.
Applicant: Valent U.S.A. LLC, 1600 Riviera Avenue, Suite 200, Walnut
Creek, CA 94596. Product name: S-2399 2.84 SC Fungicide. Active
ingredient: Fungicide--Inpyrfluxam at 31.25%. Proposed uses: Apple,
corn (field, pop and sweet), peanut, rice, soybean and sugar beet.
Contact: RD.
    4. File Symbol: 59639-EGR. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0038.
Applicant: Valent U.S.A. LLC, 1600 Riviera Avenue, Suite 200, Walnut
Creek, CA 94596. Product name: S-2399 3.2 FS Fungicide. Active
ingredient: Fungicide--Inpyrfluxam at 34.05%. Proposed uses: Seed
treatment uses on cereal grains crop group 15, legume vegetables crop
group 6, rapeseed crop subgroup 20A, and sugar beet. Contact: RD.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: December 4, 2018.
Delores Barber,
Director, Information Technology and Resources Management Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2018-27762 Filed 12-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33195-33198]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14079]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0246; FRL-9928-09-Region 9]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Butte
County Air Quality Management District, Feather River Air Quality
Management District, and San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control
District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve revisions to the Butte County Air Quality Management District
(BCAQMD), Feather River Air Quality Management District (FRAQMD), and
San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOCAPCD)
portions of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern emission statements, definitions, and vehicle and
mobile equipment coating operations (VMECO). We are approving local
rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA
or the Act).

DATES: This rule is effective on August 10, 2015 without further
notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by July 13, 2015. If
we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will
not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2015-0246, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you
consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as
such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and the EPA will
not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in
the body of your comment. If you send email directly to the EPA, your
email address will be automatically captured and included as part of
the public comment. If the EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, the
EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should
avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be
free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-3901.
While all documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be
publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3024<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rules did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of these rules?
    C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
    B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. The EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules
    D. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rules did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the rules addressed by this action with the dates
that they were adopted by the local air agencies and submitted by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB).

                                            Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Adopted/
              Local agency                  Rule No.              Rule title              Amended     Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BCAQMD..................................          101  Definitions....................      4/24/14     11/06/14
BCAQMD..................................          434  Emissions Statements...........      4/25/13      2/10/14
FRAQMD..................................         3.19  Vehicle and Mobile Equipment         8/01/11      2/10/14
                                                        Coating Operations.
SLOCAPCD................................          222  Federal Emission Statement.....      5/28/14     11/06/14
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 5, 2014, the EPA determined that the submittal for BCAQMD
Rule 434 and FRAQMD Rule 3.19 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR
part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review. On
December 18, 2014, the EPA determined that BCAQMD Rule 101 and SLOCAPCD
Rule 222 met the completeness criteria.

B. Are there other versions of these rules?

    There are no previous versions of BCAQMD Rule 434, FRAQMD Rule
3.19, and SLOCAPCD Rule 222 in the SIP. We approved an earlier version
of BCAQMD Rule 101 into the SIP on February 3, 1987 (52 FR 3226).

C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules?

    Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) help produce ground-level ozone
and smog, which harm human health and the environment. Section 110(a)
of the CAA requires States to submit regulations that control VOC
emissions.
    BCAQMD Rule 101, ``Definitions'' is amended by adding new
definitions and revising existing definitions which improve clarity and
enforceability of other BCAQMD rules which reduce emissions.
    BCAQMD Rule 434 and SLOCAPCD Rule 222 require ``Emissions
Statements.'' CAA section 182(a)(3)(B)(i) directs ozone nonattainment
areas to require certified emission data from sources of VOCs and
oxides of nitrogen (NOX).
    FRAQMD Rule 3.19, Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations,
establishes limits on the emission of VOC from VMECO.
    The EPA's technical support documents (TSDs) have more information
about these rules.

II. EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?

    SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not
interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section
110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in
nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions
reductions (see CAA section 193).
    Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate
enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements
for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following:

    1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the
Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,''
(57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992 and 57 FR 18070, April 28, 1992).
    2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies,
and Deviations'' (``the Bluebook,'' U.S. EPA, May 25, 1988; revised
January 11, 1990).
    3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies'' (``the Little Bluebook'', EPA Region 9, August 21,
2001).
    4. EPA's draft ``Guidance on the Implementation of an Emission
Statement Program,'' July 1992.
    5. FRAQMD ``Reasonably Available Control Technology Analysis and
Negative Declaration'', July 3, 2014.
    6. National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards, 40 CFR
59.102, Subpart B, Table 1, VOC Content Limits for Automobile
Refinish Coatings.
    7. California Air Resources Board (CARB) Resolution 05-46,
October 20, 2005, Attachment A, ``Suggested Control Measure for
Automotive Coatings,'' Section 4.1 ``Coating Limits.''
    8. South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1151, Motor
Vehicle and Motor Equipment Non-Assembly Line Coating Operations,
amended December 2, 2005, and approved into the SIP on September 24,
2013 (78 FR 58459.)
    9. San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District
Rule 4612, Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations,
amended October 21, 2010, and approved into the SIP on February 13,
2012 (77 FR 7536.)
    10. Ventura County Air Quality Management District, Rule 74.18,
Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations amended
November 11, 2008, and approved into the SIP on September 24, 2013
(78 FR 58459.)

    Generally, SIP rules must require Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a Control
Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document as well as each VOC major source
in ozone nonattainment areas classified as moderate or above (see
sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f)).
    The FRAQMD covers both Yuba and Sutter Counties, and the EPA has
designated a portion of the FRAQMD (specifically, southern Sutter
County) as a Severe nonattainment area for the 1-hour ozone standard
and the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS or standards). See 40 CFR 81.305. Therefore, FRAQMD
must implement RACT for at least portions of the District. The EPA
believes that FRAQMD Rule 3.19 does not implement RACT-level
requirements. However, on September 29, 2014, CARB submitted to the EPA
on behalf of FRAQMD, ``Reasonably Available Control Technology Analysis
and Negative Declaration,'' dated July 3, 2014, which demonstrates that
Rule 3.19 does not have to implement RACT because no CTGs apply to the
source category and there are no major sources in the non-attainment
area that the rule addresses. RACT is not required of the other rules
addressed in this action because they are not intended to directly
control emissions.
    As noted above, CAA section 182(a)(3)(B)(i) requires all states
with ozone nonattainment areas classified under subpart 2 (of part D of
title I), i.e., as Marginal, Moderate, Serious, etc., to submit SIP
revisions that require owners and operators of stationary sources of
VOCs and NOX to provide the state with a statement showing
the actual emissions from that source. The EPA has designated all or
portions of BCAQMD and SLOCAPCD as Marginal nonattainment areas for the
1997 or the 2008 8-hour ozone standards. See 40 CFR 81.305. Thus,
BCAQMD Rule 434 and SLOCAPCD Rule 222 are required SIP revisions. Based
on our evaluation of these two emissions statement rules, we find that
they meet the requirements of CAA section 182(a)(3)(B)(i).

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?

    We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and
guidance regarding enforceability, rule stringency, and SIP
relaxations. The TSDs have more information on our evaluation.

C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules

    The TSDs describe additional rule revisions that we recommend for
the next time the local agency modifies the rules but are not currently
the basis for rule disapproval.

D. Public Comment and Final Action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all
relevant requirements.\1\ We do not think anyone will object to this
approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance.
However, in

the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are
simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rules. If we
receive adverse comments by July 13, 2015, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct
final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in
a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive
timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective
without further notice on August 10, 2015. This will incorporate these
rules into the federally enforceable SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ BCAQMD Rule 434, FRAQMD Rule 3.19, and SLOCAPCD Rule 222 are
all new to the SIP and thus would not supersede any existing SIP
rules. Upon the effective date of this final action, BCAQMD Rule 101
would supersede existing SIP BCAQMD Rules 101 (``Title'') and 102
(``Definitions''), approved at 52 FR 3226 (February 3, 1987), in the
applicable California SIP, except for the following definitions from
existing SIP BCAQMD Rule 102: ``approved ignition devices,'' ``open
out-door fire,'' ``permissive burn day,'' ``range improvement
burning,'' ``submerged fill pipe,'' and ``vapor recovery system.''
While these terms are no longer included in BCAQMD's definitions
rule (i.e., Rule 101), they are relied upon by certain existing SIP
prohibitory rules, such as existing SIP BCAQMD Rules 213, 215, 302,
313, 317, and 323.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Please note that if the EPA receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final
those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse
comment.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
BCAQMD, FRAQMD and SLOCAPCD rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR
part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make,
these documents generally available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 10, 2015. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action Parties with objections to this direct final
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed
Rules section of this Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that the EPA
can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.

    Dated: May 8, 2015.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220, is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(442) (i)(E)(4)
and (G) and (c)(457)(i)(C) and (D) to read as follows:

Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (442) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (E) * * *
    (4) Rule 3.19, ``Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations,''
amended on August 1, 2011.
* * * * *

    (G) Butte County Air Quality Management District.
    (1) Rule 434, ``Emission Statements,'' adopted on April 25, 2013.
* * * * *
    (457) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (C) * * *
    (1) Rule 101, ``Definitions,'' amended on April 24, 2014.
    (D) San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District.
    (1) Rule 222, ``Federal Emission Statement,'' adopted on May 28,
2014.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-14079 Filed 6-10-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


From:
Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent:
Monday, October 18, 2021 6:34 PM
To:
D'Angelo, Wayne J<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Stuart, Eric<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Green, Joseph J<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Balserak, Paul<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:
RE: EAF NSPS extension

Wayne, et al - It was in the works for a while but I did not want to say anything until it was firm since we requested it of the litigants and it also needed to go through the court. In the not so distant past, there was a rule where both sides were in agreement about an extension and the court said no. So better to not say anything until it was a done deal. For EAFs, the economists needed more time because they are short staffed and there were/are a number of high(er) profile rules going on at the same time that took priority (gasoline, oil and gas, mercury MACT, etc. I was ready to go forward with EAFs so it was disappointing for me but nothing I could do. I have the coke ovens rule to work on, so plenty to keep me busy. Id just rather have gotten EAFs done sooner rather than later.

Thanks for your offer to provide support. Once the economists get back on EAFs, they may have some questions.

Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

Pronouns - She/Her/Hers
Salutation - Dr./Ms.

From: D'Angelo, Wayne J<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 6:09 PM
To: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Stuart, Eric<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Green, Joseph J<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Balserak, Paul<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: [SPAM-Sender] RE: EAF NSPS extension

Hello Dr. Jones.  Thank you for sharing this.  I was not aware this extension was in the works and, in fact, I understood that EPA appeared to be on schedule to meet the original Nov. 1, 2021 deadline for proposal.  Do you have any insight you can share on EPA's rationale for seeking this extension?  I'm certain the members of the steel trades will have some questions about the need for the additional six months so any context for the decision would be helpful.

And of course, regardless of timing, the steel association representatives and I remain committed to getting you whatever you need to facilitate the review of the NSPS.

Thank you again for the notice.  I appreciate all you've done throughout this process.

Best,
Wayne

WAYNE D'ANGELO

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Tel:<PHONE_NUMBER>
Cell:<PHONE_NUMBER>

From: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 2:16 PM
To: Stuart, Eric<EMAIL_ADDRESS>D'Angelo, Wayne J<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Green, Joseph J<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Balserak, Paul<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: EAF NSPS extension

Hello all - Im not sure if I mentioned to you all that this was in the works, but we finally received official confirmation that the EAF NSPS review has been extended until May 2, 2022 for proposal and May 1, 2023 for final.

Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

Pronouns - She/Her/Hers
Salutation - Dr./Ms.


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 123 (Thursday, June 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36314-36315]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14901]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0494; FRL 9912-34-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; Plant Incorporated Protectants; CBI
Substantiation and Adverse Effects Reporting (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has submitted the following information collection request
(ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.): Plant Incorporated Protectants; CBI Substantiation and
Adverse Effects Reporting (EPA ICR No. 1693.08, OMB Control No. 2070-
0142). EPA did not receive any comments in response to the previously
provided public review opportunity issued in the Federal Register on
September 25, 2013 (78 FR 59014). With this submission, EPA is
providing an additional 30 days for public comments. An Agency may not
conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 28, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OPP-2013-0494, to (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer for EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Drewes, Field and External
Affairs Division, 7506P, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (703)
347-0107; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Docket: The ICR, which explains in detail the information
collection activities and the related burden and cost estimates, is
summarized in this document and is available in the docket for this
ICR. The docket can be viewed online at http://www.regulations.gov or
in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone number for the
Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional information about EPA's
docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    ICR Title: Plant Incorporated Protectants; CBI Substantiation and
Adverse Effects Reporting.
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1693.08, OMB Control No. 2070-0142.
    ICR status: The current OMB approval for this ICR is scheduled to
expire on June 30, 2014. Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue
to conduct or sponsor the collection of information while this
submission is pending at OMB.
    Abstract: This ICR addresses the two information collection
requirements

described in regulations pertaining to pesticidal substances that are
produced by plants (plant-incorporated protectants) and which are
codified in 40 CFR part 174. A plant-incorporated protectant is defined
as ``the pesticidal substance that is intended to be produced and used
in a living plant and the genetic material necessary for the production
of such a substance.'' Many, but not all, plant-incorporated
protectants are exempt from registration requirements under the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Registrants
sometimes include in a submission to EPA for registration of plant-
incorporated protectants information that they claim to be confidential
business information (CBI). CBI is protected by FIFRA and generally
cannot be released to the public. Under 40 CFR part 174, whenever a
registrant claims that information submitted to EPA in support of a
registration application for plant-incorporated protectants contains
CBI, the registrant must substantiate such claims when they are made,
rather than provide it later upon request by EPA. In addition,
manufacturers of plant-incorporated protectants that are otherwise
exempted from the requirements of registration must report adverse
effects of the plant-incorporated protectant to the Agency. Such
reporting will allow the Agency to determine whether further action is
needed to prevent unreasonable adverse effects to the environment.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Entities potentially affected by
this ICR include producers and importers of Plant Incorporated
Protectants (PIPs). The North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes for respondents under this ICR include: 325320 (Pesticide
and other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing), 325414 (Biological
Products (except Diagnostic) Manufacturing), 422910 (Farm Supplies
Wholesalers), 422930 (Flower, Nursery Stock, and Florists's Suppliers),
541710 (Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life
Sciences), and 611310 (Colleges, Universities, and Professional
Schools).
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory.
    Estimated number of respondents: 20.
    Frequency of response: On occasion.
    Total estimated burden: 432 hours (per year). Burden is defined at
5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $31,371 (per year). There are no annualized
capital or operation & maintenance costs associated with this ICR.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is increase of 43 hours in the
total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently
approved by OMB. This increase reflects EPA's updating of burden
estimates for this collection based upon historical information on the
number of CBI substantiations per year. Based upon revised estimates,
the number of CBI substantiations per year has increased from 18 to 20,
with a corresponding increase in the associated burden. This change is
an adjustment.

Spencer W. Clark,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-14901 Filed 6-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: May 22, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 100)]
[Notices]
[Page 29753-29755]
[DOCID:fr22my08-44]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0380; FRL-8569-5]

Notice of Receipt of a Request From the State of Texas for a
Waiver of a Portion of the Renewable Fuel Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 211(o)(7) of the Clean Air Act (the
Act), 42 U.S.C. 7545(o)(7), EPA is issuing a notice of receipt of a
request for a waiver of 50 percent of the renewable fuel standard (RFS)
``mandate for the production of ethanol derived from grain.'' The
request has been made by the Governor of the State of Texas. Section
211(o)(7)(A) of the Act allows the Administrator of the EPA to grant
the waiver if implementation of the national RFS requirements would
severely harm the economy or environment of a state, a region, or the
United States, or if EPA determines that there is inadequate domestic
supply of renewable fuel. EPA is required by the Act to provide public
notice and

opportunity for comment on this request.

DATES: Comments. Written comments must be received on or before June
23, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2008-0380, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Air and Radiation Docket, Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2008-0380, Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 6102T, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. Please include a total
of two copies.
     Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room, EPA
West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20460. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal
hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2008-0380. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James W. Caldwell, Office of
Transportation and Air Quality, Mailcode: 6406J, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

(A) How Can I Access the Docket and/or Submit Comments?

    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0380, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the EPA/DC Docket
Center Public Reading Room, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 3334,
Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the Air and Radiation Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use http://www.regulations.gov to obtain a copy of the waiver
request, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of
the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public
docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select
``search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified in this
document.

(B) What Information Is EPA Particularly Interested In?

    On April 25, 2008, the Governor of Texas submitted a request to the
Administrator under section 211(o) of the Act for a waiver of 50
percent of the RFS ``mandate for the production of ethanol derived from
grain.'' The request includes statements regarding the economic impact
of higher corn prices in Texas. This request has been placed in the
public docket.
    Pursuant to section 211(o)(7) of the Act, EPA specifically solicits
comments and information to enable the Administrator to determine if
the statutory basis for a waiver of the national RFS requirements has
been met and, if so, the extent to which EPA should exercise its
discretion to grant a waiver. Section 211(o)(7) of the Act allows the
Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture and
the Secretary of Energy, to waive the requirements of the national RFS
at 40 CFR 80.1105, in whole or in part, upon petition by one or more
States. A waiver may be granted if the Administrator determines, after
public notice and an opportunity for public comment, that
implementation of the RFS requirements would severely harm the economy
or environment of a state, a region, or the United States; or that
there is an inadequate domestic supply of renewable fuel. The
Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture and
the Secretary of Energy, shall approve or disapprove a State petition
for a waiver within 90 days of receiving it. If a waiver is granted, it
can last no longer than one year unless it is renewed by the
Administrator after consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture and
the Secretary of Energy. The RFS for 2008 was published in the Federal
Register on February 14, 2008 (73 FR 8665) and was intended to lead to
the use of nine (9) billion gallons of renewable fuel in 2008.
    EPA requests comment on any matter that might be relevant to EPA's
action on the petition, specifically including (but not limited to)
information that will enable EPA to:
    (a) Evaluate whether compliance with the RFS is causing severe harm
to the economy of the State of Texas;
    (b) evaluate whether the relief requested will remedy the harm;
    (c) determine to what extent, if any, a waiver approval would
change demand for ethanol and affect corn or feed prices; and
    (d) determine the date on which a waiver should commence and end if
it were granted.
    In addition to inviting comments on the above issues, EPA
recognizes that it has discretion in deciding whether to grant a
waiver, as the statute provides that ``[t]he Administrator * * * may
waive the requirements of [section 211(o)(2)] in whole or in part''
(emphasis supplied) if EPA determines that the severe harm criteria has
been met. EPA also recognizes that a waiver would involve reducing the
national volume requirements under section 211(o)(2), which would have
effects in areas of the country other than Texas, including areas that
may be positively impacted by the RFS requirements. Given this, EPA
invites comment on all issues relevant to deciding whether and how to
exercise its discretion under this provision, including but not limited
to the impact of a waiver on other regions or parts of the economy, on
the environment, on the goals of the renewable fuel program, on
appropriate mechanisms to implement a waiver if a waiver were
determined to be

appropriate, and any other matters considered relevant to EPA's
exercise of discretion under this provision.
    Commenters should include data or specific examples in support of
their comments in order to aid the Administrator in determining whether
to grant or deny the waiver. Data that shows a quantitative link
between the use of corn for ethanol and corn prices, and on the impact
of the RFS mandate on the amount of ethanol produced, would be
especially helpful.

    Dated: May 16, 2008.
Robert J. Meyers,
Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. E8-11486 Filed 5-21-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


% Mosquitocide exposure, inhalation 1.5h/day 21 days
% Dose to reach average cpfos conc in blood = 0.004 ug/L
% Oct 18, 2016
% Cecilia Tan

% Setting model parameters
use human_parameters_MRP
use preg_female_parameters
BWSW=1;		% Set BW to a fixed value
BWST=11;	 % Set BW for child at 11 kg
QPC = 79.94;	%QALV = 79.94*(11^0.74)*0.7 = 330 L/hr = 0.33 m3/h (from Kelly/Wade 10/13/2016)
PREG=0;		% Not pregnant
TSTOP=504;	%Simulation time = 21 days work week

% Inhalation exposure
%CONCMGM=0.51 % Inhalation concentration mg/m3
CONCMGM = 0.0011;	%Inhalation concentration in mg/m3
D3IN=7;  %DAYS/WEEK
P2IN=1.5; %HRS/DAY
S2IN=0 ;%OFFSET FROM 0 START TIME (EG IF YOU WANT TO MODEL FROM MIDNIGHT, BUT DOSE AT 8 AM)
W2IN=21; %21 day exposure

prepare @clear@all
start @NoCallback
simall = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6 _cvo*334.5 _blauc*350.6 _blauco*334.5 _blaucavg*350.6 _blaucoavg*334.5];	%conc unit = ug/L

save simall @file='mosquitocide_child_inhalation_cc_15' @format=ascii