[Federal Register: March 19, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 54)]
[Notices]
[Page 14790]
[DOCID:fr19mr08-46]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

March 13, 2008.
    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:
    Docket Numbers: RP99-176-156.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Co of America.
    Description: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC submits
amendment to the Transportation Rate Schedule FTS Agreement with
negotiated rate between Natural and JP Morgan Ventures Energy
Corporation.
    Filed Date: 03/11/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080312-0148.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 24, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-165-001.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC submits Substitute Second
Revised Sheet 402 et al to FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume 1, to
be effective March 1, 2008.
    Filed Date: 03/11/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080312-0073.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 24, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-269-000.
    Applicants: Quest Pipelines (KPC).
    Description: Quest Pipelines (KPC) submits proposed revisions to
First Revised Sheet 173 and 349 to FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised
Volume 1, to be effective April 11, 2008.
    Filed Date: 03/11/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080312-0071.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 24, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-270-000.
    Applicants: Garden Banks Gas Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Garden Banks Gas Pipeline, LLC submits its FERC Gas
Tariff, Original Volume 1 an original of its Second Revised Sheet 226
to be effective June 1, 2007.
    Filed Date: 03/07/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080311-0396.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, March 19, 2008.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-5534 Filed 3-18-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 197 (Thursday, October 10, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54600-54601]
[FR Doc No: 2019-22175]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Applications Accepted for Filing, Soliciting Comments,
Protests and Motions To Intervene

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Project Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbrook Wisconsin, LLC.............................          2536-093
City of Norway, Michigan..............................          2720-067
City of Crystal Falls, Michigan.......................         11402-076
Wisconsin Electric Power Company......................          2486-087
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric applications have been
filed with the Commission and are available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Proceeding: Extension of License Terms.
    b. Project Nos.: P-2536-093, P-2720-067, P-11402-076, and P-2486-
087.
    c. Dates Filed: June 13, 2019 and July 16, 2019.
    d. Licensees: Northbrook Wisconsin, LLC (P-2536-093), City of
Norway, Michigan (P-2720-067), City of Crystal Falls, Michigan (P-
11402-076), and Wisconsin Electric Power Company (P-2486-087).
    e. Names and Locations of the Projects: The Little Quinnesec Falls
(P-2536) and Sturgeon Falls (P-2720) hydroelectric projects located on
the Menominee River, in Dickinson County, Michigan and Marinette
County, Wisconsin. The Crystal Falls Hydroelectric Project No. 11402
located on the Paint River, in Iron County, Michigan and the Pine
Hydroelectric Project No. 2486 located on the Pine River, in Florence
County, Wisconsin.
    f. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    g. Licensees Contact Information: (P-2536-093) Mr. Michael
Scarzello, Regulatory Director, Eagle Creek Renewable Energy, 116 State
Street, P.O. Box 167, Neshkoro, WI 54960,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(P-2720-067) Mr. Ray Anderson, City
Manager, 915 Main Street, P.O. Box 99, Norway, MI 49870, (906) 563-
9961, Ext. 205; (P-11402-076) Mr. David Graff, Electric Department
Supervisor, City of Crystal Falls Electrical Department, 401 Superior
Avenue, Crystal Falls, MI 49920,<PHONE_NUMBER>; (P-2486-087) Mr. Mike
Grisar, Principal Environmental Consultant, WEC Business Services LLC,
231 West Michigan Street, Milwaukee, WI 53203,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    h. FERC Contact: Mr. Ashish Desai,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene and protests
is 30 days from the issuance date of this notice by the Commission. The
Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file motions
to intervene, protests, comments, and recommendations, using the
Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000
characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system at
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your
name and contact information at the end

of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper copy to:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should include
docket number, for example, ``P-2536-093''.
    Note that you can file comments, motions to intervene, and protects
in response to all of the projects identified in the notice together
(i.e., one response for all projects) or you can respond to each
project individually, or do a combination of both.
    j. Description of Proceeding: Northbrook Wisconsin, LLC, the City
of Norway, Michigan, and the City of Crystal Falls, Wisconsin on June
13, 2019 and the Wisconsin Electric Power Company on July 16, 2019,
filed applications to extend the license terms for four projects
located on the Menominee River and two of its tributaries, the Paint
and Pine rivers. The four projects include the Little Quinnesec Falls
Project No. 2536 licensed to Northbrook Wisconsin, LLC, the Sturgeon
Falls Project No. 2720 licensed to the City of Norway, Michigan, the
Crystal Falls Project No. 11402 licensed to the City of Crystal Falls,
Wisconsin, and the Pine Project No. 2486 licensed to Wisconsin Electric
Power Company.
    The licensees request that the license terms for the four projects
be extended to July 31, 2040 to align the license expiration dates with
nine other project located on the upper Menominee River basin.
Currently, the 40-year license for the Little Quinnesec Falls Project
expires on April 30, 2037 and the 30-year licenses for the Crystal
Falls, Pine, and Sturgeon Falls projects correspondingly expire on
September 30, 2025, November 30, 2025, and December 31, 2034. The
licensees state that aligning the license expiration dates of the
projects would allow for a comprehensive study and analysis of the
upper Menominee River basin projects, expedite the consultation process
for all parties, and maximize the consideration of cumulative and
environmental impacts in the related proceedings at relicensing.
    k. This notice is available for review and reproduction at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room, Room 2A, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. The filing may also be viewed on the Commission's
website at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the
Docket number (for example, P-2536-093) excluding the last three digits
in the docket number field to access the notice. You may also register
online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be
notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3676
or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    l. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    m. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
and .214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    n. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filing must (1)
bear in all capital letters the title COMMENTS, PROTEST, or MOTION TO
INTERVENE as applicable; (2) set forth in the heading the name of the
applicant(s) and the project number(s) of the application to which the
filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone number of
the person protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise comply with the
requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All comments, motions
to intervene, or protests must set forth their evidentiary basis and
otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). All comments,
motions to intervene, or protests should relate to the requests to
extend the license terms. Agencies may obtain copies of the
applications directly from the applicants. A copy of any protest or
motion to intervene must be served upon each representative of the
applicant specified in the particular application. If an intervener
files comments or documents with the Commission relating to the merits
of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a particular
resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document on that
resource agency. A copy of all other filings in reference to these
applications must be accompanied by proof of service on all persons
listed in the service list prepared by the Commission in this
proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.

    Dated: October 4, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-22175 Filed 10-9-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 67 (Thursday, April 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19338-19339]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8249]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13-023]

Green Island Power Authority; Notice of Authorization for
Continued Project Operation

    On March 2, 2009 Green Island Power Authority, licensee for the
Green Island Hydroelectric Project, filed an Application for a New
License pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA) and the Commission's
regulations thereunder. The Green Island Hydroelectric Project is on
the Hudson River in Albany County, New York.
    The license for Project No. 13 was issued for a period ending March
2, 2011. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), requires the
Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue from year-to-
year an annual license to the then licensee under the terms and
conditions of the prior license until a new license is issued, or the
project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 15 or any other
applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior license waived
the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based on section 9(b)
of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as set forth
at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has filed an
application for a subsequent license, the licensee may continue to
operate the project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the
license after the minor or minor part license expires, until the
Commission acts on its application. If the licensee of such a project
has not filed an application for a subsequent license, then it may be
required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to continue project operations
until the Commission issues someone else a

license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 13 is issued to the
Green Island Power Authority for a period effective March 3, 2011
through March 2, 2012, or until the issuance of a new license for the
project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If
issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does not take place on
or before March 2, 2012, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18
CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is
hereby given that Green Island Power Authority is authorized to
continue operation of the Green Island Hydroelectric Project, until
such time as the Commission acts on its application for a subsequent
license.

    Dated: March 31, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-8249 Filed 4-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: July 3, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 129)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 38122-38124]
[DOCID:fr03jy08-6]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2008-0337; FRL-8565-2]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South
Coast Air Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern
oxides of nitrogen (NOX) and oxides of sulfur
(SOX) emissions from facilities emitting 4 tons or more per
year of NOX or SOX in the year 1990 or any
subsequent year under the SCAQMD's Regional Clean Air Incentives Market
(RECLAIM) program. We are approving local rules that regulate these
emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the
Act).

DATES: This rule is effective on September 2, 2008 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by August 4, 2008. If we
receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will
not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2008-0337, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
    2. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you
consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as
such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region
IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents
in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment
during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lily Wong, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-
4114<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rules did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of these rules?
    C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
    B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rules did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the rules we are approving with the dates that they
were adopted by the SCAQMD and submitted by the California Air
Resources Board (CARB).

                                            Table 1.--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Local agency                 Rule No.             Rule title               Adopted     Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCAQMD...................................       2004  Requirements....................     04/06/07     03/07/08
SCAQMD...................................       2007  Trading Requirements............     04/06/07     03/07/08
SCAQMD...................................       2010  Administrative Remedies and          04/06/07     03/07/08
                                                       Sanctions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On April 17, 2008, this rule submittal was found to meet the
completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix V, which must be met
before formal EPA review.

B. Are there other versions of these rules?

    Table 2 lists the previous versions of these rules approved into
the SIP.

                                 Table 2.--Current SIP Approved Version of Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Rule No.                 Rule title       Adopted     Submitted          Approved FR citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004...........................  Requirements.....     05/11/01     05/31/01  09/04/03, 68 FR 52512
2007...........................  Trading               05/06/05     10/20/05  08/29/06, 71 FR 51120
                                  Requirements.
2010...........................  Administrative        01/07/05     07/15/05  08/29/06, 71 FR 51120
                                  Remedies and
                                  Sanctions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?

    NOX helps produce ground-level ozone, smog and
particulate matter, which harm human health and the environment.
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States to submit regulations that
control NOX emissions. The RECLAIM program was initially
adopted by SCAQMD in October 1993. The program established for many of
the largest NOX and SOX facilities in the South
Coast Air Basin a regional NOX and SOX emissions
cap and trade program, with the emissions caps declining over time. The
program was designed to provide incentives for sources to reduce
emissions and advance pollution control technologies by giving sources
added flexibility in meeting emission reduction requirements. A RECLAIM
source's emissions may not exceed its holding of RECLAIM Trading
Credits (RTCs) in any compliance year. A RECLAIM source may comply with
this requirement by installing control equipment, modifying their
activities, or purchasing RTCs from other facilities.
    The primary purposes of the amendments to the RECLAIM rules were to
provide some relief on reporting and to improve clarity and
enforceability of the rules. The amendments to Rule 2004 relieve
sources from submitting quarterly certification reports when there are
zero emissions. The amendments to Rule 2007 clarify the reporting
requirements for certain contractual agreements called forward
contracts and address enforceability of the program to parties who
participate in trading but do not live in California. The amendments to
Rule 2010 clarify that if a facility has excess emissions violations
and changes operators, the old and new operators are both liable for
past violations. The amendments include a mechanism to assign
liability. EPA's technical support document (TSD) has more information
about these rules.

II. EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?

    Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the
Act), must require Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for
each category of sources covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines
(CTG) document as well as each major source in nonattainment areas (see
sections 182(a)(2) and 182(f)), and must not relax existing
requirements (see sections 110(l) and 193). The SCAQMD regulates an
ozone nonattainment area (see 40 CFR part 81), so Regulation XX (Rules
2000 through 2020) must fulfill RACT.
    Guidance and policy documents that we use to help evaluate
enforceability and RACT requirements consistently include the
following:
    1. ``State Implementation Plans; Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to the
General Preamble; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 Implementation of
Title I; Proposed Rule,'' (the NOX Supplement), 57 FR 55620,
November 25, 1992.
    2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and
Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook).
    3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook).
    4. ``Improving Air Quality with Economic Incentive Programs,'' EPA-
452/R01-001 (the EIP guidance), January 2001.

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?

    We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and
guidance regarding enforceability, SIP relaxations, and economic
incentive programs. The TSD has more information on our evaluation.

C. Public Comment and Final Action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully
approving the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all
relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this
approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance.
However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are
simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rules. If we
receive adverse comments by August 4, 2008, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct
final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in
a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive
timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective
without further notice on September 2, 2008. This will incorporate
these rules into the federally enforceable SIP.
    Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 2, 2008. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: April 22, 2008.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

0
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(354) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (354) New and amended regulations for the following APCDs were
submitted on March 7, 2008, by the Governor's designee.
    (i) Incorporation by reference.
    (A) South Coast Air Quality Management District.
    (1) Rule 2004, ``Requirements'' adopted on October 15, 1993 and
amended on April 6, 2007.
    (2) Rule 2007, ``Trading Requirements'' adopted on October 15, 1993
and amended April 6, 2007.
    (3) Rule 2010, ``Administrative Remedies and Sanctions'' adopted on
October 15, 1993 and amended on April 6, 2007.

[FR Doc. E8-14884 Filed 7-2-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: January 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 16)]
[Notices]
[Page 4136-4137]
[DOCID:fr26ja10-117]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

[Docket No. PHMSA-2010-0016]

Pipeline Safety: Requests for Special Permit

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA);
DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: PHMSA is publishing this notice of special permit requests we
have received from two pipeline operators, seeking relief from
compliance with certain requirements in the Federal pipeline safety
regulations. This notice seeks public comments on these requests,
including comments on any safety or environmental impacts. At the
conclusion of the 30-day comment period, PHMSA will evaluate each
request and determine whether to grant or deny a special permit.

DATES: Submit any comments regarding these special permit requests by
February 25, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Comments should reference the docket numbers for the
specific special permit requests and may be submitted in the following
ways:
     E-Gov Web Site: http://www.Regulations.gov. This site
allows the public to enter comments on any Federal Register notice
issued by any agency.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
     Mail: Docket Management System: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: DOT Docket Management System: U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC
20590, between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
    Instructions: You should identify the docket number for the special
permit request you are commenting on at the beginning of your comments.
If you submit your comments by mail, please

submit two copies. To receive confirmation that PHMSA has received your
comments, please include a self-addressed stamped postcard. Internet
users may submit comments at http://www.Regulations.gov. Note: Comments
are posted without changes or edits to http://www.Regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided.
    Privacy Act Statement: Anyone can search the electronic form of
comments received in response to any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted
on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement was published in the Federal Register on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: General: Kay McIver by telephone at
(202) 366-0113; or, e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Technical: Steve Nanney by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>; or, e-mail
at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PHMSA has received these requests for
special permits from pipeline operators who seek relief from compliance
with certain pipeline safety regulations. Each request is filed in the
Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) and has been assigned a
separate docket number in the FDMS. Each docket includes any technical
analysis or other supporting documentation provided by the requestor,
including a description of any alternative measures the operator
proposes to take in lieu of compliance with the current regulations. We
invite interested persons to participate by reviewing these special
permit requests at http://www.Regulations.gov, and by submitting
written comments, data or other views. Please include any comments on
potential environmental impacts that may result if these special
permits are granted.
    Before acting on these special permit requests, PHMSA will evaluate
all comments received on or before the comments closing date. Comments
will be evaluated after this date if it is possible to do so without
incurring additional expense or delay. PHMSA will consider each
relevant comment we receive in making our decision to grant or deny a
request and what terms and conditions are appropriate.
    PHMSA has received the following two special permit requests:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Docket No.                    Requester            Regulation(s)         Nature of special permit
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHMSA-2009-0390...................  Colonial Pipeline      49 CFR 195.310(b)....  Colonial Pipeline Company
                                     Company.                                      requests relief from certain
                                                                                recordkeeping requirements
                                                                                for two segments of Line 01.
                                                                                Colonial Pipeline Company
                                                                                operates 1,049 miles of 40-
                                                                                inch and 36-inch diameter
                                                                                steel pipeline that runs from
                                                                                Houston, Texas to Greensboro,
                                                                                North Carolina. The segments
                                                                                of request include
                                                                                approximately 66 miles of 40-
                                                                                inch pipeline in LA, and 10
                                                                                miles of 36-inch pipeline in
                                                                                GA, for which Colonial can no
                                                                                longer locate certain
                                                                                pressure recording charts and
                                                                                calibration data from the
                                                                                original construction
                                                                                hydrostatic testing of the
                                                                                pipeline. These original
                                                                                construction hydrostatic
                                                                                tests were conducted more
                                                                                than thirty years ago. The
                                                                                application is for a special
                                                                                permit to waive the
                                                                                requirement to have retained
                                                                                the pressure recording charts
                                                                                and certain other pressure
                                                                                test data.
PHMSA-2009-0407...................  Union Oil of           49 CFR 195.452(h)(3)   Union Oil of California
                                     California (Chevron).  and                    requests a waiver to the 180-
                                                            195.452(h)(4)(iii).    day repair requirement for a
                                                                                riser which is part of the
                                                                                Anna platform ``A'' pipeline.
                                                                                The Anna platform ``A''
                                                                                pipeline terminates at the
                                                                                Bruce platform riser located
                                                                                in Kenai Borough, Alaska on
                                                                                the Cook Inlet, a navigable
                                                                                waterway. The Bruce platform
                                                                                riser, for which the special
                                                                                permit is sought, is a 12-
                                                                                inch OD riser, constructed of
                                                                                .500 inch wall thickness,
                                                                                ASTM A53 grade B material
                                                                                with coating of unknown
                                                                                origin. The riser was
                                                                                constructed in 1967. Union
                                                                                Oil of California conducted
                                                                                an in-line inspection in
                                                                                2008. The results
                                                                                demonstrated a 64% wall loss.
                                                                                Union Oil of California
                                                                                requests a waiver from
                                                                                repairs due to the
                                                                                inaccessibility of the repair
                                                                                location, the MOP, and the
                                                                                remaining 36% original wall
                                                                                thickness. Union Oil of
                                                                                California proposes
                                                                                alternative measures to
                                                                                mitigate the wall thickness
                                                                                loss. These measures include
                                                                                re-inspection of the 12-inch
                                                                                pipeline riser location in
                                                                                2010.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 60118(c)(1) and 49 CFR 1.53.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 19, 2010.
Jeffrey D. Wiese,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2010-1470 Filed 1-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 1984]
[FR Doc No: 2016-00625]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Eighth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee (231) Terrain Awareness
Warning Systems (TAWS)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of eighth RTCA Special Committee 231 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the
Eighth RTCA Special Committee 231 meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 9-12, 2016 from 9:00 a.m.-5:00
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Hilton Garden Inn, Phoenix
North/Happy Valley, 1940 W. Pinnacle Peak Road, Phoenix, AZ 85027, Tel:
(202) 330-0654.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org or
Harold Moses, Program Director, RTCA, Inc<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(202) 330-
0654.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is
hereby given for a meeting of RTCA Special Committee 231. The agenda
will include the following:

Tuesday, February 9, 2016 (9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)

1. Welcome/Introduction
2. Administrative Remarks
3. Agenda Review
4. Summary of Working Group activities
5. Other Business
6. Date and Place of Next Meeting

Wednesday, February 10, 2016 (9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)

1. Continuation of Plenary or Working Group Session

Thursday, February 11, 2016 (9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)

1. Continuation of Plenary or Working Group Session

Friday, February 12, 2016 (9:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m.)

1. Continuation of Plenary or Working Group Session
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Plenary information will be
provided upon request. Persons who wish to present statements or obtain
information should contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may present a
written statement to the committee at any time.

     Issued in Washington, DC, on January 11, 2016.
Latasha Robinson,
Management & Program Analyst, NextGen, Enterprise Support Services
Division, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-00625 Filed 1-13-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 166 (Monday, August 29, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52690-52691]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18534]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2016-0673; FRL-9878-02-R6]

Air Plan Approval; Albuquerque-Bernalillo County, New Mexico;
Excess Emissions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision from the New Mexico Environment
Department (NMED) submitted on October 17, 2016, on behalf of the
Albuquerque-Bernalillo County Air Quality Control Board (Air Board).
The submittal is in response to the EPA's national SIP call on June 12,
2015, concerning excess emissions during periods of Startup, Shutdown,
and Malfunction (SSM). EPA is approving the SIP submittal and finds
that the SIP revision corrects the substantial inadequacies identified
in the June 12, 2015, SIP call.

DATES: This rule is effective on September 28, 2022.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-2016-0673. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet. Publicly available docket
materials are available electronically through https://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Alan Shar, Regional Haze and
SO2 Section, EPA Region 6 Office, 1201 Elm Street, Suite
500, Dallas, Texas 75270,<PHONE_NUMBER>, [email protected]. Out of an
abundance of caution for members of the public and our staff, the EPA
Region 6 office may be closed to the public to reduce the risk of
transmitting COVID-19. Please call or email the contact listed above if
you need alternative access to material indexed but not provided in the
docket.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' means the EPA.

I. Background

    The background for this action is discussed in detail in our June
13, 2022 (87 FR 35701) proposal. In that document, we proposed to
approve the removal of Part 49 Excess Emissions from the Albuquerque-
Bernalillo County provisions of the New Mexico SIP. We also proposed to
determine that such SIP revision corrects the substantial inadequacies
identified in the June 12, 2015 SIP call.

II. Response to Comments

    The public comment period for our proposed approval and
determination ended on July 13, 2022, and no adverse comments were
received. We received one comment supporting the action and urged EPA
to take action on a separate SIP submittal concerning 20.2.7 NMAC
Excess Emissions of the New Mexico SIP.
    We acknowledge the support for our proposal and note that while
20.2.7 NMAC (Part 7 Excess Emissions) of the New Mexico SIP was not the
subject of our June 13, 2022 (87 FR 35701) proposal, the EPA intends to
fulfill its obligations under the terms of a consent decree for taking
action on the New Mexico SIP submittal concerning 20.2.7 NMAC.\1\ As no
concerns were raised in public comment, we are finalizing our action as
proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Consent Decree resolving Sierra Club et al. v. Regan
(Case No. 4:21-CV-6956-SBA, N.D. Calif.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Final Action

    The EPA is approving a revision to the Albuquerque-Bernalillo
County provisions of the New Mexico SIP submitted on October 17, 2016,
in response to the EPA's national SIP call of June 12, 2015, concerning
excess emissions during periods of SSM. More specifically, we are
approving the removal of Part 49 Excess Emissions from the Albuquerque-
Bernalillo County provisions of the New Mexico SIP. We are approving
these revisions in accordance with section 110 of the Act. EPA is also
determining that the SIP revision corrects the inadequacies identified
in the June 12, 2015 SIP call.

IV. Environmental Justice Considerations

    Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) directs federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on minority populations and low-income
populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
The EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect to the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies.'' The EPA further defines the term fair treatment to

mean that ``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and policies.'' \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ https://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/learn-about-environmental-justice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EPA provided additional analysis of environmental justice
associated with this action for the purpose of providing information to
the public in our June 13, 2022 (87 FR 35701) proposal. As discussed in
the proposed action, this action is intended to ensure that all
communities and populations across Bernalillo County and downwind
areas, including people of color and low-income and indigenous
populations overburdened by pollution, receive the full human health
and environmental protection provided by the CAA through the removal of
affirmative defense provisions that have interfered with the
enforcement structure of the CAA by raising inappropriate impediments
to enforcement by states, the EPA, or citizens. We therefore determine
that this rule will not have disproportionately high or adverse human
health or environmental effects on communities with environmental
justice concerns.

V. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is removing the incorporation by reference of the
``20.11.49 NMAC'' in 40 CFR 52.1620, as described in the Final Action
above. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials
generally available through www.regulations.gov (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information). Therefore, these materials have
been approved by EPA for removal from the SIP, have been removed from
incorporation by reference by EPA into that plan, are no longer
federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the
effective date of the final rulemaking of the EPA's approval, and
incorporation by reference will be removed in the next update to the
SIP compilation.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
    Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
    Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
    Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
    Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
    Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
    Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on
health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997);
    Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order
13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
    Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with
the CAA; and
    Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address,
as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects,
using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Consistent with the EPA Policy on Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribes (May 4, 2011), the EPA offered consultation (by letter
dated June 6, 2022) on our proposed rulemaking to tribal governments
that may be affected by this action. We received no requests for tribal
consultation.
    This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act, and the EPA
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by October 28, 2022. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: August 23, 2022.
Earthea Nance,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental
Protection Agency amends 40 CFR part 52 as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart GG--New Mexico

Sec.  52.1620  [Amended]

0
2. Amend Sec.  52.1620(c) in the second table titled ``EPA Approved
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County, NM Regulations'' by removing the entry
for ``Part 49 (20.11.49 NMAC)''.

[FR Doc. 2022-18534 Filed 8-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1214-1215]
[FR Doc No: 2023-00097]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2394-008; ER10-2395-008.
    Applicants: Colorado Power Partners, BIV Generation Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Updated Market Power Analysis for Northwest Region of
BIV Generation Company, L.L.C., et al.
    Filed Date: 12/28/22.
    Accession Number: 20221228-5221.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/18/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2753-009; ER12-1316-008.
    Applicants: Silver State Solar Power North, LLC, Cedar Point Wind,
LLC.
    Description: Triennial Market Power Analysis for Northwest Region
of Cedar Point Wind, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5255.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/27/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1217-002.
    Applicants: Total Gas & Power North America, Inc.
    Description: Triennial Market Power Analysis for Northwest Region
of TotalEnergies Gas & Power North America, Inc.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5258.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/27/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-2197-003.
    Applicants: Atlantic City Electric Company, PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: Atlantic City Electric Company
submits tariff filing per 35: ACE and Delmarva Supplemental Compliance
Filing ER20-2197 & ER20-2198 to be effective 9/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5100.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/19/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-1395-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of New Mexico.
    Description: Refund Report: Refund Report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5227.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/19/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-101-001.
    Applicants: North East Offshore, LLC.
    Description: Market: Market Base Rate Triennial Review to be
effective 12/30/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5208.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/27/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-102-001.
    Applicants: Revolution Wind, LLC.
    Description: Market: Market Base Rate Triennial Review to be
effective 12/30/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5212.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/27/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-103-001.
    Applicants South Fork Wind, LLC.
    Description: Market: Market Base Rate Triennial Review to be
effective 12/30/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5211.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/27/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-104-001.
    Applicants Sunrise Wind LLC.
    Description: Market: Market Base Rate Triennial Review to be
effective 12/30/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5217.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/27/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-337-001.
    Applicants Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: 3599R1 Missouri Electric Commission
NITSA NOA to be effective 1/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5098.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/19/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-739-000.
    Applicants ISO New England Inc., Eversource Energy Service Company
(as agent), New England Power Pool Participants Committee, The United
Illuminating Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: ISO New England Inc. submits
tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: Revisions to Enable Treatment of
Storage as Transmission-Only Asset--Part 1 of 2 to be effective 12/31/
9998.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5051.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/19/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-740-000.
    Applicants Evergy Kansas Central, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment, Market-Based Rate
Tariff to be effective 2/13/2023.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5061.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/19/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-741-000.
    Applicants Evergy Metro, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment, Market-Based Rate
Tariff to be effective 2/27/2023.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5064.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/19/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-742-000.
    Applicants: Evergy Missouri West, Inc.
    Description:: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment, Market-Based
Rate Tariff to be effective 2/27/2023.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5067.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/19/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-743-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc., Eversource Energy Service Company
(as agent),The United Illuminating Company, New England Power Pool
Participants Committee.
    Description:: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: ISO New England Inc.
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: Revisions to Enable
Treatment of Storage as Transmission-Only Assets--Part 2 of 2 to be
effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5086.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/19/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-744-000.
    Applicants: Occidental Power Marketing, L.P.
    Description: Market: Occidental Power Marketing, L.P. Updated
Market Power Analysis to be effective 12/30/2022.
    Filed Date:12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5137.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/27/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-745-000.
    Applicants: Occidental Power Services, Inc.
    Description: Market: Occidental Power Services, Inc. Updated Market
Power Analysis to be effective 12/30/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5138.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/27/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-746-000.
    Applicants: OTCF, LLC.
    Description: Market: OTCF, LLC Updated Market Power Analysis to be
effective 12/30/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5139.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/27/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-747-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: First Revised ISA, Service
Agreement No. 1435; Queue AC1-008_AC2-071_AG1-001 to be effective 11/
29/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5144.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/19/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-748-000.
    Applicants: Power 2 Profit Energy Solutions, Inc.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Market-Based Rate Tariff
Application to be effective 1/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5184.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/19/23

    Docket Numbers: ER23-749-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original NSA, Service
Agreement No. 6722; Queue No. AE1-155 to be effective 11/30/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20221229-5271.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/19/23.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: December 29, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-00097 Filed 1-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 102 (Thursday, May 26, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30538-30539]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13179]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Part 774

The Commerce Control List

CFR Correction

    In Title 15 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 300 to 799,
revised as of January 1, 2011, on page 802, in Supplement No. 1 to Part
774, in Category 6, in ECCN 6A005, the following text is reinstated at
the end of the entry:

6A005 ``Lasers'' (other than those described in 0B001.g.5 or .h.6),
components and optical equipment, as follows (see List of Items
Controlled).

* * * * *

    Items:
* * * * *
    d.5. ``Chemical lasers'', as follows:
    d.5.a. Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) ``lasers'';
    d.5.b. Deuterium Fluoride (DF) ``lasers'';
    d.5.c. ``Transfer lasers'', as follows:
    d.5.c.1. Oxygen Iodine (O2-I) ``lasers'';
    d.5.c.2. Deuterium Fluoride-Carbon dioxide (DF-CO2) ``lasers'';
    d.6. ``Non-repetitive pulsed'' Neodymium (Nd) glass ``lasers'',
having any of the following:
    d.6.a. A ``pulse duration'' not exceeding 1 [micro]s and an
output energy exceeding 50 J per pulse; or
    d.6.b. A ``pulse duration'' exceeding 1 [micro]s and an output
energy exceeding 100 J per pulse;
    NOTE: ``Non-repetitive pulsed'' refers to ``lasers'' that
produce either a single output pulse or that have a time interval
between pulses exceeding one minute.
    e. Components, as follows:
    e.1. Mirrors cooled either by active cooling or by heat pipe
cooling; Technical Note: Active cooling is a cooling technique for
optical components using flowing fluids within the subsurface
(nominally less than 1 mm below the optical surface) of the optical
component to remove heat from the optic.
    e.2. Optical mirrors or transmissive or partially transmissive
optical or electro-optical components specially designed for use
with controlled ``lasers'';
    f. Optical equipment, as follows:
    N.B.: For shared aperture optical elements, capable of operating
in ``Super-High Power Laser'' (``SHPL'') applications, see the U.S.
Munitions List (22 CFR part 121).
    f.1. Dynamic wavefront (phase) measuring equipment capable of
mapping at least 50 positions on a beam wavefront having any the
following:
    f.1.a. Frame rates equal to or more than 100 Hz and phase
discrimination of at least 5% of the beam's wavelength; or
    f.1.b. Frame rates equal to or more than 1,000 Hz and phase
discrimination of at least 20% of the beam's wavelength;
    f.2. ``Laser'' diagnostic equipment capable of measuring
``SHPL'' system angular beam steering errors of equal to or less
than 10 [micro]rad;
    f.3. Optical equipment and components specially designed for a
phased-array ``SHPL'' system for coherent beam combination to an
accuracy of lambda/10 at the designed wavelength, or 0.1 [micro]m,
whichever is the smaller;
    f.4. Projection telescopes specially designed for use with
``SHPL'' systems.

[FR Doc. 2011-13179 Filed 5-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D