[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 30, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59901-59903]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18638]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP23-523-000]

ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Scoping Period Requesting
Comments on Environmental Issues for the Proposed Oak Grove Enhancement
Project

    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental document, that will discuss
the environmental impacts of the Oak Grove Enhancement Project
involving construction and operation of facilities by ANR Pipeline
Company (ANR) in Richland and West Carroll Parishes, Louisiana. The
Commission will use this environmental document in its decision-making
process to determine whether the project is in the public convenience
and necessity.
    This notice announces the opening of the scoping process the
Commission will use to gather input from the public and interested
agencies regarding the project. As part of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) review process, the Commission takes into account
concerns the public may have about proposals and the environmental
impacts that could result from its action whenever it considers the
issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. This
gathering of public input is referred to as ``scoping.'' The main goal
of the scoping process is to focus the analysis in the environmental
document on the important environmental issues. Additional information
about the Commission's NEPA process is described below in the NEPA
Process and Environmental Document section of this notice.
    By this notice, the Commission requests public comments on the
scope of issues to address in the environmental document. To ensure
that your comments are timely and properly recorded, please submit your
comments so that the Commission receives them in Washington, DC, on or
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on September 25, 2023. Comments may be
submitted in written form. Further details on how to submit comments
are provided in the Public Participation section of this notice.
    Your comments should focus on the potential environmental effects,
reasonable alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental
impacts. Your input will help the Commission staff determine what
issues they need to evaluate in the environmental document. Commission
staff will consider all written comments during the preparation of the
environmental document.
    If you submitted comments on this project to the Commission before
the opening of this docket on August 1, 2023, you will need to file
those comments in Docket No. CP23-523-000 to ensure they are considered
as part of this proceeding.
    This notice is being sent to the Commission's current environmental
mailing list for this project. State and local government
representatives should notify their constituents of this proposed
project and encourage them to comment on their areas of concern.
    If you are a landowner receiving this notice, a pipeline company
representative may contact you about the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the proposed facilities. The company
would seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable easement agreement. You
are not required to enter into an agreement. However, if the Commission
approves the project, the Natural Gas Act conveys the right of eminent
domain to the company. Therefore, if you and the company do not reach
an easement agreement, the pipeline company could initiate condemnation
proceedings in court. In such instances, compensation would be
determined by a judge in accordance with State law. The

Commission does not subsequently grant, exercise, or oversee the
exercise of that eminent domain authority. The courts have exclusive
authority to handle eminent domain cases; the Commission has no
jurisdiction over these matters.
    ANR provided landowners with a fact sheet prepared by the FERC
entitled ``An Interstate Natural Gas Facility On My Land? What Do I
Need To Know? '' which addresses typically asked questions, including
the use of eminent domain and how to participate in the Commission's
proceedings. This fact sheet along with other landowner topics of
interest are available for viewing on the FERC website (www.ferc.gov)
under the Natural Gas, Landowner Topics link.

Public Participation

    There are three methods you can use to submit your comments to the
Commission. Please carefully follow these instructions so that your
comments are properly recorded. The Commission encourages electronic
filing of comments and has staff available to assist you at (866) 208-
3676 or [email protected].
    (1) You can file your comments electronically using the eComment
feature, which is located on the Commission's website (www.ferc.gov)
under the link to FERC Online. Using eComment is an easy method for
submitting brief, text-only comments on a project;
    (2) You can file your comments electronically by using the eFiling
feature, which is located on the Commission's website (www.ferc.gov)
under the link to FERC Online. With eFiling, you can provide comments
in a variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your
submission. New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking
on ``eRegister.'' You will be asked to select the type of filing you
are making; a comment on a particular project is considered a ``Comment
on a Filing''; or
    (3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the Commission. Be sure to reference the project docket number (CP23-
523-000) on your letter. Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service
must be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC
20426. Submissions sent via any other carrier must be addressed to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Additionally, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which makes it easy to stay informed of all issuances and
submittals regarding the dockets/projects to which you subscribe. These
instant email notifications are the fastest way to receive notification
and provide a link to the document files which can reduce the amount of
time you spend researching proceedings. Go to https://www.ferc.gov/ferc-online/overview to register for eSubscription.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners,
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is
encouraged to contact OPP at<PHONE_NUMBER> or [email protected].

Summary of the Proposed Project

    ANR proposes to construct and operate 34.1 miles of new 30-inch-
diameter natural gas pipeline to replace 33.6 miles of existing 30-
inch-diameter natural gas pipeline that ANR would abandon. The Oak
Grove Enhancement Project would continue to provide about 1,233 million
square cubic feet per day of natural gas to its existing end user. No
increase in natural gas capacity is anticipated. According to ANR, its
project would improve the integrity and reliability of ANR's system by
replacing vintage pipeline facilities installed in the 1950's with new
pipeline facilities.
    The Oak Grove Enhancement Project would consist of the following
facilities:
     Installation of 34.1 miles of new 30-inch-diameter segment
of natural gas pipeline, which will begin at ANR's existing Delhi
Compressor Station (CS) in Richland Parish and primarily parallel the
existing Line 0-501, 1-501, and 2-501 pipelines before the new segment
ties into the existing route just south of State Route 586 in West
Carroll Parish at the terminus of the existing Line 0-501 segment to be
abandoned.
     Abandonment in place and by removal of 33.6 miles of
existing 30-inch-diameter natural gas pipeline, which begins at ANR's
existing Delhi CS in Richland Parish and terminates just south of State
Route 586 in West Carroll Parish. Approximately 1 percent (0.25 mile)
of the existing Line 0-501 segment would be abandoned by removal, while
the remaining existing pipeline segments (totaling 33.35 miles) would
be abandoned in place.
    The general location of the project facilities is shown in appendix
1.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The appendices referenced in this notice will not appear in
the Federal Register. Copies of the appendices were sent to all
those receiving this notice in the mail and are available at
www.ferc.gov using the link called ``eLibrary''. For instructions on
connecting to eLibrary, refer to the last page of this notice. At
this time, the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's
Public Reference Room. For assistance, contact FERC at
[email protected] or call toll free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY
(202) 502-8659.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Land Requirements for Construction

    Construction and abandonment of the proposed facilities would
disturb about 702.4 acres of land for the replacement pipeline.
Following construction, ANR would maintain about 170.3 acres for
permanent operation of the project's facilities; the remaining acreage
would be restored. Approximately 91 percent (31.1 miles) of the new
pipeline would be co-located with existing rights-of-way or paralleling
existing utility corridors. Areas where ANR was unable to co-locate the
pipeline with existing rights-of-way or parallel existing corridors was
primarily due to reroutes around Wetland Reserve Program easements,
sensitive environmental areas, and constructability issues (e.g.,
crossings of waterbodies).

NEPA Process and the Environmental Document

    Any environmental document issued by the Commission will discuss
impacts that could occur as a result of the abandonment, construction,
and operation of the proposed project under the relevant general
resource areas:
     geology and soils;
     water resources and wetlands;
     vegetation and wildlife;
     threatened and endangered species;
     cultural resources;
     land use;
     environmental justice;
     air quality and noise; and
     reliability and safety.
    Commission staff will also evaluate reasonable alternatives to the
proposed project or portions of the project and make recommendations on
how to lessen or avoid impacts on the various resource areas. Your
comments will help Commission staff identify and focus on the issues
that might have an effect on the human environment and potentially
eliminate others from further study and discussion in the environmental
document.
    Following this scoping period, Commission staff will determine
whether to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) or an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS). The EA or the EIS will present Commission
staff's

independent analysis of the issues. If Commission staff prepares an EA,
a Notice of Schedule for the Preparation of an Environmental Assessment
will be issued. The EA may be issued for an allotted public comment
period. The Commission would consider timely comments on the EA before
making its decision regarding the proposed project. If Commission staff
prepares an EIS, a Notice of Intent to Prepare an EIS/Notice of
Schedule will be issued, which will open up an additional comment
period. Staff will then prepare a draft EIS which will be issued for
public comment. Commission staff will consider all timely comments
received during the comment period on the draft EIS and revise the
document, as necessary, before issuing a final EIS. Any EA or draft and
final EIS will be available in electronic format in the public record
through eLibrary \2\ and the Commission's natural gas environmental
documents web page (https://www.ferc.gov/industries-data/natural-gas/environment/environmental-documents). If eSubscribed, you will receive
instant email notification when the environmental document is issued.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ For instructions on connecting to eLibrary, refer to the
last page of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With this notice, the Commission is asking agencies with
jurisdiction by law and/or special expertise with respect to the
environmental issues of this project to formally cooperate in the
preparation of the environmental document.\3\ Agencies that would like
to request cooperating agency status should follow the instructions for
filing comments provided under the Public Participation section of this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Council on Environmental Quality regulations addressing
cooperating agency responsibilities are at title 40, Code of Federal
Regulations, section 1501.8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consultation Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act

    In accordance with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
implementing regulations for section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act, the Commission is using this notice to initiate
consultation with the applicable State Historic Preservation Office(s),
and to solicit their views and those of other government agencies,
interested Indian tribes, and the public on the project's potential
effects on historic properties.\4\ The environmental document for this
project will document findings on the impacts on historic properties
and summarize the status of consultations under section 106.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's regulations
are at title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, part 800. Those
regulations define historic properties as any prehistoric or
historic district, site, building, structure, or object included in
or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Environmental Mailing List

    The environmental mailing list includes Federal, State, and local
government representatives and agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest groups; Native American Tribes; other
interested parties; and local libraries and newspapers. This list also
includes all affected landowners (as defined in the Commission's
regulations) who are potential right-of-way grantors, whose property
may be used temporarily for project purposes, or who own homes within
certain distances of aboveground facilities, and anyone who submits
comments on the project and includes a mailing address with their
comments. Commission staff will update the environmental mailing list
as the analysis proceeds to ensure that Commission notices related to
this environmental review are sent to all individuals, organizations,
and government entities interested in and/or potentially affected by
the proposed project.
    If you need to make changes to your name/address, or if you would
like to remove your name from the mailing list, please complete one of
the following steps:
    (1) Send an email to [email protected] stating your
request. You must include the docket number CP23-523-000 in your
request. If you are requesting a change to your address, please be sure
to include your name and the correct address. If you are requesting to
delete your address from the mailing list, please include your name and
address as it appeared on this notice. This email address is unable to
accept comments. OR
    (2) Return the attached ``Mailing List Update Form'' (appendix 2).

Additional Information

    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC website at www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link. Click on the
eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter the docket number
in the ``Docket Number'' field. Be sure you have selected an
appropriate date range. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at [email protected] or<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link also provides access to the
texts of all formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders,
notices, and rulemakings.
    Public sessions or site visits will be posted on the Commission's
calendar located at https://www.ferc.gov/news-events/events along with
other related information.

    Dated: August 23, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-18638 Filed 8-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 220 (Friday, November 13, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 72679]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25077]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4465-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]

North Carolina; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of North Carolina (FEMA-4465-DR), dated October 4, 2019,
and related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on October 13, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Myra M. Shird,
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for
this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Elizabeth Turner as
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-25077 Filed 11-12-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: April 29, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 82)]
[Notices]
[Page 22638]
[DOCID:fr29ap10-124]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 155; OMB Control No. 3235-0549; SEC File No. 270-492.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
    Rule 155 (17 CFR 230.155) under the Securities Act of 1933 (15
U.S.C. 77a et seq.) provides safe harbors for a registered offering
following an abandoned private offering, or a private offering
following an abandoned registered offering, without integrating the
registered and private offerings in either case. Rule 155 requires any
prospectus filed as a part of a registration statement after a private
offering to include disclosure regarding abandonment of the private
offering. Similarly, the rule requires an issuer to provide each
offeree in a private offering following an abandoned registered
offering with: (1) Information concerning withdrawal of the
registration statement; (2) the fact that the private offering is
unregistered; and (3) the legal implications of the offering's
unregistered status. The likely respondents will be companies. Rule 155
takes approximately 4 hours per response to prepare and is filed by 600
respondents. We estimate that 50% of the 4 hours per response (2 hours
per response) is prepared by the filer for a total annual reporting
burden of 1,200 hours (2 hours per response x 600 responses).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether this proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Charles Boucher, Director/
CIO, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley Martinson, 6432
General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an e-mail to: PRA_
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: April 22, 2010.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-9876 Filed 4-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53211-53213]
[FR Doc No: 2015-21665]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-75773; File No. SR-Phlx-2015-73]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to
Manipulative Operations

August 27, 2015.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 19, 2015, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rules 782, entitled ``Manipulative
Operations'' to enumerate manipulative trading practices which are
already prohibited, but not specified.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this proposed rule change is to amend Rule 782,
entitled ``Manipulative Operations'' to specify other manipulative
trading practices which are currently prohibited. Today the
manipulative trade practices specified in the amended rule text are
prohibited from being transacted on the Exchange pursuant to both
federal laws \3\ and Exchange Rules.\4\ The enumerated manipulative
practices in Rule 782, including the amended rule text, is not an
exhaustive list, rather, these activities serve as guidance to certain
trading practices that are prohibited on Phlx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See 17 CFR 10b-5.
    \4\ Phlx Rule 782 currently states, ``[n]o member, member
organization, partner or stockholder therein shall directly or
indirectly participate in or have any interest in the profits of a
manipulative operation or knowingly manage or finance a manipulative
operation.'' Also, Phlx Rule 707 prohibits conduct inconsistent with
just and equitable principles of trade and Rule 708 prohibits acts
detrimental to the welfare of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to adopt the rule text currently in The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'') Rule 3351, entitled ``Trading
Practices'' to provide market participants with additional guidance
related to prohibited trading practices.\5\ The proposed rule text
would enumerate certain manipulative trading practices, which are
currently prohibited. Phlx Rule 782 applies to both equities and
options transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Nasdaq Rule 3351 is an equities rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The new rule text would enumerate prohibitions such that no member
or member organization shall be permitted to execute or cause to be
executed or participate in an account for which there are executed
purchases of any listed security, at successively higher prices, or
sales of any such security at successively lower prices, for the
purpose of creating or inducing a false, misleading or artificial
appearance of activity in such security or for the purpose of unduly or
improperly influencing the market price for such security or for the
purpose of establishing a price which does not reflect the true state
of the market in such security.
    No member or member organization would be permitted to create or
induce a false or misleading appearance of activity in a listed
security or create or induce a false or misleading appearance with
respect to the market in such security for these types of activities in
the amended rule text: (1) Execute any transaction in such security
which involves no change in the beneficial ownership thereof; or (2)
enter any order or orders for the purchase of such security with the
knowledge that an order or orders of substantially the same size, and
at substantially the same price, for the sale of any such security, has
been or will be entered by or for the same or different parties; or (3)
enter any order or orders for the sale of any such security with the
knowledge that an order or orders of substantially the same size, and
at substantially the same price, for the purchase of such security, has
been or will be entered by or for the same or different parties.
    The new rule text would specify that no member or member
organization would be permitted to execute purchases or sales of a
listed security for any account in which such member or member
organization is directly or indirectly interested, which purchases or
sales are excessive in view of the member's or member organization's
financial resources or in view of the market for such security.
    The rule text enumerates a prohibition for members and member
organizations from participating directly or indirectly, in the profits
of a manipulative operation or knowingly managing or financing a
manipulative operation. This would include: (1) Any pool, syndicate or
joint account organized or used intentionally for the purpose of
unfairly influencing the market price of a listed security; (2) the
solicitation of subscriptions to or the acceptance of discretionary
orders from any such pool, syndicate or joint account; or (3) the
carrying on margin of a position in such securities or the advancing of
credit through loans to any such pool, syndicate or joint account.
    The rule text specifies that no member or member organization shall
make any statement or circulate and disseminate any information
concerning a listed security which such member knows or has reasonable
grounds for believing is false or misleading or would improperly
influence the market price of such security.
    No member, member organization or person associated with a member
or member organization shall, directly or indirectly, hold any interest
or participation in any joint account for buying or selling a listed
security, unless such joint account is promptly reported to Phlx. The
report should contain the following information for each account: (1)
Name of the account, with names of all participants and their
respective interests in profits and losses; (2) a statement regarding
the purpose of

the account; (3) name of the member carrying and clearing the account;
and (4) a copy of any written agreement or instrument relating to the
account.
    The rule text states that no member or member organization shall
offer that a transaction or transactions to buy or sell a listed
security will influence the closing transaction on the Consolidated
Tape or The Options Price Reporting Authority (``OPRA''). A member or
member organization may, but is not obligated to, accept a stop order
in a listed security. A buy stop order is an order to buy which becomes
a market order when a transaction takes place at or above the stop
price. A sell stop order is an order to sell which becomes a market
order when a transaction takes place at or below the stop price. A
member or member organization may, but is not obligated to, accept stop
limit orders in listed securities. When a transaction occurs at the
stop price, the stop limit order to buy or sell becomes a limit order
at the limit price.
    No member, member organization or person associated with a member
or member organization shall execute or cause to be executed, directly
or indirectly, on a Phlx transaction in a security subject to an
initial public offering until such security has first opened for
trading on the national securities exchange listing the security, as
indicated by the dissemination of an opening transaction in the
security by the listing exchange via the Consolidated Tape or OPRA.
    The Exchange believes that the addition of this rule text will
bolster the current rule and provide members and member organizations
with guidance on the type of manipulative practices that are
specifically prohibited on Phlx. Also, the Exchange believes that the
addition of the rule text will serve to also conform the Exchange's
rule to that of Nasdaq.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \6\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \7\ in particular, in that it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule text will prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, promote just and equitable principles of trade, and better
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes is the proposed rule change is consistent
with principles of just and equitable principles of trade while also
ensuring that members and member organizations may continue to engage
in transactions that do not present the risk of abusive trading
practices that the rule is intended to prevent. The Exchange believes
that proposed rule text would enhance the protection of orders of
market participants by specifically addressing various types of
currently prohibited abusive trading that may be intended to take
advantage of such orders. Specifically, the proposed rule change seeks
to provide greater guidance by enumerating certain manipulative trading
practices that are currently prohibited.
    As previously noted, the proposed rule text is similar to Nasdaq
Rule 3351. While Nasdaq Rule 3351 applies to equity transactions, Phlx
proposes to apply the amended rule text to both equity and options
transactions, as is the case today with Rule 782 today. The Exchange
believes that specifying the type of manipulative conduct that is
already prohibited and described in Rule 782, including the amended
rule text, on both the equities and options market will prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, promote just and
equitable principles of trade and better protect investors and the
public interest. The Exchange proposes to prohibit this type of
behavior on the Exchange as a whole. The Exchange believes specifying
the practices that are currently prohibited on both the equities and
options markets promotes just and equitable principles of trade.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act. The proposed rule change is not designed to address any
competitive issues, rather it is designed to enable the Exchange to
protect orders of market participants from abusive and manipulative
conduct on both the equities and options markets, by offering
additional guidance, while also harmonizing the rule to that of Nasdaq.
The Exchange's proposed amendments seek to harmonize the Rulebook with
that of Nasdaq.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\9\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \12\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\13\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed
rule change may become operative immediately.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposal would benefit investors and
market participants by specifically enumerating certain abusive and
manipulative trading practices, which the Exchange notes are currently
prohibited. The Exchange further states that amending Phlx Rule 782 to
provide market participants with additional guidance regarding such
activity would ``benefit the protection of investors and the public
interest.'' Based on the foregoing, the Commission finds that waiving
the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of

investors and the public interest and hereby designates the proposal
operative upon filing.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2015-73 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2015-73. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2015-73,
and should be submitted on or before September 23, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12), (59).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-21665 Filed 9-1-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 45 (Thursday, March 9, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13173-13175]
[FR Doc No: 2017-04602]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-80150; File No. SR-ICC-2017-003]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Notice of
Proposed Rule Change, Security-Based Swap Submission, or Advance Notice
Relating to ICC's End-of-Day Price Discovery Policies and Procedures

March 3, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934,\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on
February 16, 2017, ICE Clear Credit LLC (``ICC'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change, security-based swap submission, or advance notice as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared primarily
by ICC. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on
the proposed rule change, security-based swap submission, or advance
notice from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the
Proposed Rule Change, Security-Based Swap Submission, or Advance Notice

    The principal purpose of the proposed changes is to make changes to
the ICC End-of-Day Price Discovery Policies and Procedures (``Pricing
Policy'') related to the implementation of ICC's new Clearing
Participant (``CP'') direct price submission process.

II. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Proposed Rule Change, Security-Based Swap Submission, or
Advance Notice

    In its filing with the Commission, ICC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change,
security-based swap submission, or advance notice and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed rule change, security-based swap
submission, or advance notice. The text of these statements may be
examined at the places specified in Item IV below. ICC has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of these statements.

A. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Proposed Rule Change, Security-Based Swap Submission, or
Advance Notice

    ICC proposes revising its Pricing Policy to make changes related to
the implementation of ICC's new CP direct price submission process.
Currently, ICC uses an intermediary agent to implement functions of its
price discovery process. Specifically, under the current process,
Clearing Participants submit required prices to the intermediary agent;
these prices are then input into ICC's price settlement methodology to
determine settlement prices. ICC proposes to enhance its price
discovery process to remove the intermediary agent from the price
settlement process. In doing so, ICC will require CPs to submit prices
directly to the clearinghouse. The prices will continue to be input
into ICC's price settlement methodology to determine settlement prices.
There are no changes to the price settlement methodology as a result of
the changes. The proposed revisions to the Pricing Policy are described
in detail as follows.
    ICC updated the Pricing Policy to note that ICC requires CPs to
establish direct connectivity with the clearinghouse and use a FIX API
to submit required prices. ICC revised the Pricing Policy to remove
references to the intermediary agent and the Valuation Service API (and
related message terminology), which will be decommissioned with the
launch of the new CP direct price submission process, and to add
reference to the new FIX API message terminology, which will be
utilized under the new CP direct price submission process. Such changes
are reflected throughout the Pricing Policy. ICC has also updated the
Pricing Policy to specify that ICC will send the unsolicited FIX API
messages directly to each CP.

    Under the new CP direct price submission process, ICC will
consolidate the price discovery process across indices and singles
names; as such, new FIX API messages will include information for both
Indices and Single Names. Previously, the price discovery process
provided files separately for each product type.
    ICC updated the Submission Requirements set forth in the Pricing
Policy to include iTraxx Australia and iTraxx Asia Ex-Japan indices.
For both indices, prices must be submitted in spread and either
midpoint or bid-offer format. Further, ICC updated the Submission
Requirements for CDX.NA.HY and CDX.EM indices to note that prices may
be submitted in either price or upfront format; previously, only price
format was accepted.
    ICC has updated the Pricing Policy to reflect the replacement of
existing firm trade data files with new FIX API firm trade messages.
ICC also made minor changes to the timing of certain steps in the price
settlement process; no changes were made to the actual settlement
submission windows.
    ICC also updated the Distribution of End-of-Day Prices process set
forth in the Pricing Policy. Under the new CP direct price submission
process, ICC will publish separate messages to CPs, listing end-of-day
prices for single names and indices. The end-of-day prices provided
will not change and will continue to be based on CPs' cleared
positions. ICC will continue to publish end-of-day prices for every
listed risk sub-factors' most actively traded instrument, and will
distribute daily end-of-day prices for all cleared instruments through
Markit.
    Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \3\ requires, among other things,
that the rules of a clearing agency be designed to protect investors
and the public interest and to comply with the provisions of the Act
and the rules and regulations thereunder. ICC believes that the
proposed rule changes are consistent with the requirements of the Act
and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to ICC, in
particular, to Section 17(A)(b)(3)(F),\4\ because ICC believes that the
proposed rule changes will assure the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions, derivatives agreements,
contracts, and transactions, as the proposed revisions simplify and
increase the efficiency of ICC's price discovery process, which
includes the determination of settlement prices and firm trades. As
such, the proposed changes are designed to promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions,
derivatives agreements, contracts, and transactions within the meaning
of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.\5\ Further, such changes are
consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(d)(4),\6\ as the changes will decrease
external operational risk, since ICC no longer would rely on the
service of an intermediary agent to perform key aspects of its price
discovery process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \4\ Id.
    \5\ Id.
    \6\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(d)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Clearing Agency's Statement on Burden on Competition

    ICC does not believe the proposed rule changes would have any
impact, or impose any burden, on competition. The changes to ICC's
price submission process apply uniformly across all market
participants. Therefore, ICC does not believe the proposed rule changes
impose any burden on competition that is inappropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.

C. Clearing Agency's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change,
Security-Based Swap Submission, or Advance Notice Received From
Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not been
solicited or received. ICC will notify the Commission of any written
comments received by ICC.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change, Security-Based
Swap Submission, or Advance Notice and Timing for Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, security-based swap submission, or advance notice is consistent
with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following
methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-ICC-2017-003 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ICC-2017-003. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change, security-
based swap submission, or advance notice that are filed with the
Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change, security-based swap submission, or advance notice between
the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld
from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will
be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's
Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on
official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.
Copies of such filings will also be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of ICE Clear Credit and on ICE Clear
Credit's Web site at https://www.theice.com/clear-credit/regulation.
    All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ICC-2017-003
and should be submitted on or before March 30, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-04602 Filed 3-8-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Draft, 4/ 12/ 05; subject to change Page 1 of 14 1.0 FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS 1.1 Industry Profile Food service establishments include facilities in SIC codes 5812, Eating Places, and 5813, Drinking Places. The 1987 SIC Code Manual defines these SIC codes as follows:

SIC Code 5812: Establishments primarily engaged in the retail sale of prepared food and drinks for on premise or immediate consumption. Caterers and industrial and institutional food service establishments are also included in this industry. Establishments in which sales of alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises exceed sales of prepared food and nonalcoholic beverages are classified in Drinking Places ( SIC 5813).

SIC Code 5813: Establishments primarily engaged in the retail sale of alcoholic drinks such as beer, ale, wine, and liquor for consumption on the premises. The sale of food frequently accounts for a substantial portion of the receipts of these establishments. Meals may or may not be served.

Table 1 1. Census Data ( Available for 1997 Only)

SIC Code NAICS Code Number of Facilities in 1997 5812: Eating Places 423,082 711110: Dinner theaters 184 722110: Full service restaurants 191,245 722211: Limited service restaurants 174,104 722212: Cafeterias 4,172 722213: Snack & nonalcoholic beverage bars 27,908 722213: Ice cream & soft serve shops 9,753 722213: Frozen yogurt shops 1,582 722213: Bagel shops 3,926 722213: Coffee shops 6,843 722213: Other snack & nonalcoholic beverage bars 5,804 722310: Foodservice contractors 18,991 722320: Caterers 6,478 5813: Drinking places 722410: Drinking places ( alcoholic beverages) 52,825 Draft, 4/ 12/ 05; subject to change Page 2 of 14 ( alcoholic beverages)

Source: 1997 U. S. Census.

Table 1 2 shows 2000 TRI and PCS data available for food service establishments. No establishments reported to TRI in 2000. Of the approximately 470,000 food service establishments in the U. S. ( 1997 U. S. Census), only 57 report discharges to PCS ( all minor dischargers). Based on 470,000 total establishments and only 57 direct dischargers, the vast majority of food establishments discharge indirectly.

Table 1 2. Facility Counts SIC Code Number of Facilities Reporting to 2000 TRI Number of Facilities Reporting to PCS 2000 Direct Indirect Both No Discharge Reported Direct ( Minors)

5812 0 0 0 0 54 5813 0 0 0 0 3 Source: TRIReleases2000 and PCSLoads2000 databases.

1.2 Wastewater Characteristics 1.2.1 Wastewater Quantity Food establishments use water for food preparation ( washing, cooking, drinking water, ice, sinks), clean up ( dishwashing, floor, and rack washing), sanitation ( toilets), and landscaping ( irrigation, parking lot spraying, etc). Table 1 3 summarizes the wastewater flow data available from PCS. No wastewater flow data are available for TRI.

Table 1 3. Wastewater Flow Data From PCS 2000 SIC Flow, MGY 5812 ( 54 Establishments Reporting) Max 91,440 Min 0.000000360 Median 0.805 5813 ( 3 Establishments Reporting) Max 0.205 Min 0.144 Median 0.162 Source: PCSLoads2000. Draft, 4/ 12/ 05; subject to change Page 3 of 14 To gain additional information on discharge volumes, EPA examined some Environmental Engineering textbooks. Table 1 4 summarizes the wastewater flow data from the applicable textbooks examined.

Table 1 4. Typical Wastewater Flow Rates from Food Service Establishments Type of Establishment Wastewater Flow Range ( gal/ day per unit) Unit Textbook Source Restaurant 2  4 Meals Metcalf & Eddy Restaurant, kitchen waste only 2.5  3 Persons Standard Handbook of Environmental Engineering Restaurant, kitchen and toilet waste 7  10 Persons The Agri Food Trade Service web page ( http:// atn riae. agr. ca/ info/ us e. htm) reports that 80% of Americans get at least one meal per month from a food service establishment ( mostly takeout). Based on a U. S. population of 260 million people, Americans eat close to 7 million meals per day from food service establishments. Using an average wastewater flow range of 3 gallons per day per meal ( Metcalf & Eddy), the food service industry generates 21 MGD of wastewater, not including toilet waste.

Food establishments are usually defined either as small volume ( operating less than 16 hours a day) or large volume ( includes most fast food restaurants). One 1990 Massachusetts case study of a large volume steak house estimated that the restaurant used 13 million gallons of water annually, including toilets ( Massachusetts Water Resources Authority). The study notes that the restaurant was new and used state of the art equipment ( such as water efficient dishwashers). It served approximately 40,000 meals per week, or approximately 5,000 per day. The case study noted that it used a " minimal" volume of water compared with older, less efficient restaurants. Based on the Standard Handbook of Environmental Engineering estimate of 7 to 10 gallons per day per person, the steak house would generate 13 to 18 million gallons of wastewater per day, which corresponds to the case study findings. Table 1 5 below summarizes relevant steak house data. Draft, 4/ 12/ 05; subject to change Page 4 of 14 Table 1 5. Wastewater Flow for a Massachusetts Steak House Wastewater Source Estimated 1990 Volume ( million gallons/ year)

Toilets ( 19) 3.12 Dishwasher 1.045 Wash sinks 0.153 Rack Washing 0.147 Glass Washer 0.065 Source: Non Domestic Water Audit Report, A Steak House in Massachusetts. Prepared by B& M Technological Services, Inc. for Massachusetts Water Resources Authority. March 1990.

1.2.2 Wastewater Quality During this study, EPA could not locate a readily available source of discharge data for food service establishments that discharge to POTWs. No TRI data are available regarding pollutants in treated wastewater from food service establishments.

The 2000 PCS database contains discharge data from 57 food service facilities that are minor direct dischargers. This information represents 0.01 percent ( less than 1 percent) of the industry, as there are 470,000 food service establishments in the U. S. ( 1997 U. S. Census). In addition, because these facilities are direct dischargers, the information may or may not be representative of indirect discharging facilities ( particularly for conventional pollutants and/ or treatment chemicals such as chlorine). Nevertheless, the data provide some indication of the level and types of pollutants that may be present in discharges from food service establishments. Table 1 7 lists these facilities and their respective TWPE, where applicable. Table 1 8 lists all pollutants reported by these 57 facilities, ranked by TWPE.

Table 1 7. List of Facilities in PCSLoads2000 SIC Name City State Total TWPE 5812 Hartman James Williams Houston Houston TX 9.0 5812 Tesi/ Discovery Bay Marina Pass Christian MS 2.857 5812 Grandma's Home Cooking Rensselaer IN 0.906 5812 Marti's Place bomars River Ldg Hebron IN 0.082 5813 Sand Trap Bar & Lounge Alexandria KY 0.074 Draft, 4/ 12/ 05; subject to change Table 1 7. List of Facilities in PCSLoads2000 SIC Name City State Total TWPE Page 5 of 14 5812 Huber Family Restaurant Borden IN 0.073 5812 Colorado Café Wtp Watchung NJ 0.070 5812 Giovannis Pizza South Williamson KY 0.068 5812 Tall Tales Fish Camp Mayo SC 0.607 5812 Gardenbrook Party Center Cortland OH 0.006 5812 Cynthiana Dairy Queen Inc Cynthiana KY 0.054 5812 Happy Daze Dairy Bar Nesbit MS 0.527 5812 KY Fried Chicken Owensboro KY 0.051 5812 Simpson Property Louisville KY 0.049 5812 Cadron Creek Catfish House Bee Branch AR 0.043 5812 Beef House Restaurant Covington IN 0.359 5812 Burnaugh Enterprises Catlettsburg KY 0.322 5812 O'Brien's Pizza Pub Hot Springs Village AR 0.003 5812 McDonald's Restaurants of in Cambridge City IN 0.029 5812 Delta Inc. Leavenworth IN 0.027 5812 Riverview Restaurant Hawesville KY 0.216 5812 Fast Market Jericho AR 0.213 5812 Bananas on the River Winchester KY 0.002 5812 Village Inn Restaurant Burgin KY 0.019 5812 Toor Car & Truck Plaza Wadsworth IL 0.181 5812 Stuckey's Pecan Shoppe # 083 Coosawhatchie SC 0.159 5812 Long John Silvers Anchors Inc Owensboro KY 0.015 5812 Smith House Restaurant Owenton KY 0.013 5812 McDonalds Restaurant Owensboro KY 0.012 5812 Pilot Travel Center No. 362 Fortville IN 0.120 5812 Paws Inc. Wwtp Albany IN 0.011 5812 Catfish Kitchen Restaurant Draffenville KY 0.011 5813 Camp Springs Tavern Melbourne KY 0.001 5812 Otter Creek Park Vine Grove KY 0.001 5813 Ebbie's Mini Mart Beckmeyer IL 0.000 Draft, 4/ 12/ 05; subject to change Table 1 7. List of Facilities in PCSLoads2000 SIC Name City State Total TWPE Page 6 of 14 5812 Best Inn Missoula MT 0 5812 Brown Derby Roadhouse Ontario OH 0 5812 Fireplace Restaurant & Lounge Gurnee IL 0 5812 Golden Isles Marina St. Simons Island GA 0 5812 Halfway Restaurant Southington OH 0 5812 I 74 Auto/ truck Plaza Oakwood IL 0 5812 Keller Oil Raccoon Super K Centralia IL 0 5812 Lakeview Steak House Greer SC 0 5812 Mac's General Inv Llc dba Tin El Dorado AR 0 5812 McDonalds # 11963' s Wwtp Mt. Comfort IN 0 5812 McDonald's Restaurant Rensselaer IN 0 5812 New Jersey Turnpike Authority Salem NJ 0 5812 Old South Mountain Inn Boonsboro MD 0 5812 Pilot Travel Center # 361 Greenfield IN 0 5812 Restaurant Service LLC Houston TX 0 5812 Shamrock Restaurant Thurmont MD 0 5812 Stuckey's Restaurant Centerville IN 0 5812 The Islands Restaurant Walton KY 0 5812 Thresco Inc Crestwood KY 0 5812 Track's Inn Cortland OH 0 5812 Twin Cedars Restaurant Louisville KY 0 5812 Waunee Farms Restaurant Kewanee IL 0 Source: PCSLoads2000. Draft, 4/ 12/ 05; subject to change Page 7 of 14 Table 1 8. List of Pollutants Reported from Facilities in PCSLoads2000 SIC Pollutant Reported TWPE per Year Pounds per Year # of Facilities 5812 Total Residual Chlorine 14 29 20 5812 Ammonia as Nitrogen 1.9 1,055 39 5812 Chloroform 0.00016 0.077 2 5812 Benzene & Ethylbenzene & Toluene & Xylene ( BTEX) 1 0.000033 0.0044 1 5812 Xylenes ( Mixed Isomers) 1 0.000013 0.0031 1 5812 Toluene1 0.0000071 0.0013 1 5812 BOD, 5 day NA 14,417 55 5812 Total Suspended Solids NA 8,560 55 5812 Oil & Grease NA 781 14 5812 Phosphorus, Total ( As P) NA 16 2 5813 Nitrogen, Kjeldahl Total ( As N) NA 9 1 5813 Oxygen, Dissolved ( DO) NA NA 41 1 Some of the facilities in Table 2 7 appear to be gas stations, and the BTEX pollutant loads in Table 2 8 most likely result from gas station related operations. The facility reporting BTEX, for example, is the Ebbie's Mini Mart in Beckmeyer, IL. NA indicates that the parameters do not have TWFs assigned and, in the case of DO, pounds per year are not a representative measure.

The information in Tables 1 7 and 1 8 indicates that for the facilities reporting to PCS, toxic discharges are low, with less than 1 TWPE per facility. Also, the 1 TWPE per facility average includes loads from facilities that appear to be gas stations.

EPA also collected data about discharges to POTWs through inquiries to EPA Region pretreatment coordinators and Internet queries. These data sources show that fats, oil, and grease ( FOG) are the predominant pollutant of concern for food establishments. Oil and grease, which are lighter than water, float and can accumulate on the top and sides of sewer pipes, eventually causing clogs and sewer back ups. In particular, FOG discharges from food service establishments have been linked to sewer blockages and storm sewer overflows ( SSOs).

1.3 On Site Wastewater Treatment/ Pretreatment Most food establishments pretreat their wastewater through grease traps prior to discharge to a POTW. The http:// www. p2pays. com web site provides guidance on proper design of grease separation devices. The main design parameters for grease traps are time, temperature, turbulence, and tankage ( storage capacity). Food service establishments that install grease traps collect FOG which must be recovered from grease traps. Some localities require trap cleaning at Draft, 4/ 12/ 05; subject to change Page 8 of 14 least monthly. See the attached excerpts from the www. p2pays. com FOG Guidance Manual for illustrations of typical grease separation devices.

1.4 Local limits on FOG Many localities have established ordinances that tighten up FOG control programs to reduce blockages. Some require restaurants to install grease traps and require periodic grease clean out. Some also set pretreatment limits for FOG or oil and grease as hexane extractable material ( HEM)( of which FOG is a component). Table 1 6 lists the pretreatment requirements for select localities in North Carolina, which were available on the Internet. Some local ordinances also require certain size and/ or pumping requirements. Localities have successfully controlled FOG problems with FOG control programs, limits, and/ or grease trap requirements ( P2 Pays web site).

Table 1 6. Pretreatment Standards for Oil and Grease as HEM for Certain Localities Locality Limit ( mg/ L)

Asheville, NC 150 Raleigh, NC 300 Statesville, NC 200 Wilmington, NC 200 Wilson 200 Source: http:// www. p2pays. org.

1.5 Multimedia Environmental Releases 1.5.1 Volatilization Prior to Reaching POTW Based on information collected for this review, food service establishments do not generate significant amounts of volatile pollutants in wastewater ( p2pays and PCS 2000).

1.5.2 Solid Wastes Food service establishments generate solid waste, mostly leftover food and cuttings from food preparation. Food waste can present vector problems for trash storage. The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality provides the following guidance on reducing solid waste:

Control inventory ( minimize outdated food);

Buy in bulk to reduce container waste but consider what food will spoil; Draft, 4/ 12/ 05; subject to change Page 9 of 14

Collect and send used FOG to a renderer; and

Maintain grease traps and grease interceptors.

Food service establishments do not usually generate enough hazardous waste to be considered a RCRA generator. Hazardous waste accumulation is usually limited to caustics/ acids for cleaning and pesticides/ insecticides for pest management.

1.6 Industry Trends Many on line documents from various states and localities provide lists of BMPs and pollution prevention methods. Most of these focus on recycling water where possible and using water efficient equipment for dishwashers, closed loop condensers on refrigerators, lowflush toilets, etc. Most BMPs focus on minimizing water usage and food waste generation.

The FranchiseHandbook. com web site provides economic statistics on food service establishments, including that the industry grew 2.9% in 1999.

1.7 References 1997 U. S. Census. Available online at: http:// www. census. gov.

Agri Food Trade Service web page. http:// atn riae. agr. ca/ info/ us e. htm accessed on October 18, 2004.

Corbitt, Robert A. Standard Handbook of Environmental Engineering. 2nd Edition. McGraw Hill, 1999.

East Bay Municipal Utility District web page. http:// www. ebmud. com/ wastewater/ industrial_&_ commercial_ permits_&_ fees/ wastewater_ rates/ default. htm accessed on October 19, 2004.

E mail from Matthew Gluckman, U. S. EPA Region 5, to Jan Matuszko, U. S. EPA. October 18, 2004.

E mail from Lee Bohme, U. S. EPA Region 6, to Carey Johnston, U. S. EPA. November 1 and 2, 2004.

E mail from Stephen Copeland, U. S. EPA Region 3, to Jan Pickrel, U. S. EPA. October 26, 2004.

FranchiseHandbook. com web site. http:// www. franchise1. com/ articles/ article. asp? articleid= 57 accessed on October 19, 2004. Draft, 4/ 12/ 05; subject to change Page 10 of 14 Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, as prepared by B& M Technological Services, Inc. Non Domestic Water Audit Report, A Steak House in Massachusetts. March 1990.

P2pays. org web site. http:// www. p2pays. org accessed on October 18, 2004.

Tchobanoglous, George/ Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal, and Reuse. 2nd Edition. Irwin/ McGraw Hill, 1991. Page 11 of 14 Attachments: Excerpts from the P2Pays. com WebSite Manual, Considerations for the Management of FOG Discharge To Sanitary Sewer Systems Page 12 of 14 Source: P2Pays. com Web Site Manual, Considerations for the Management of FOG Discharge To Sanitary Sewer Systems Page 13 of 14 Source: P2Pays. com Web Site Manual, Considerations for the Management of FOG Discharge To Sanitary Sewer Systems Page 14 of 14 Example Grease Separation Device Designed to Eliminate Hydraulic Jump Source: P2Pays. com WebSite Manual, Considerations for the Management of FOG Discharge To Sanitary Sewer Systems


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 161 (Monday, August 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50092-50093]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20314]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2232-591]

Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC; Notice of Application for Amendment
of License and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Non-project use of project lands and waters.
    b. Project No: 2232-591.
    c. Date Filed: April 9, 2012.
    d. Applicant: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Catawba-Wateree Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: Lake Norman in Iredell County, North Carolina.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Dennis Whitaker, Duke Energy--Lake Services,
P.O. Box 1006,1 Charlotte, NC 28201.
    i. FERC Contact: Mark Carter,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and
protests: September 8, 2012.
    All documents may be filed electronically via the Internet. See, 18

CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail an original and seven copies to: Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
Please include the project number (P-2232-591) on any comments or
motions filed.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person whose name appears on the official service
list for the project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or
documents with the Commission relating to the merits of an issue that
may affect the responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they
must also serve a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    k. Description of Application: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC requests
after-the-fact Commission approval to amend the layout of Stutts Marina
on Lake Norman. The Commission originally approved this commercial
marina in 1983. In 2006, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC authorized
modifications to the marina, which now consists of two multi-slip
docks, one accommodating 12 watercraft and the other accommodating 19
watercraft (including one houseboat), as well as a gasoline service
dock, customer service dock, and boat ramp. The modified marina layout
is mostly similar to the originally-approved design except that the
docks have shifted location slightly and the multi-slip docks are
longer and skinnier than approved, but with shorter access ramps.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field (P-2232) to access the document. You
may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-
208-3676 or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call (202) 502-
8659. A copy is also available for inspection and reproduction at the
address in item (h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214, respectively. In determining the appropriate action to take, the
Commission will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only
those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with the
Commission's Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments,
protests, or motions to intervene must be received on or before the
specified comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Documents: Any filing must (1) Bear in all
capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or ``MOTION TO
INTERVENE'' as applicable; (2) set forth in the heading the name of the
applicant and the project number of the application to which the filing
responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone number of the
person commenting, protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise comply
with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, motions to intervene, or protests must set forth their
evidentiary basis. Any filing made by an intervenor must be accompanied
by proof of service on all persons listed in the service list prepared
by the Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR
385.2010.

    Dated: August 9, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-20314 Filed 8-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 63 (Friday, April 1, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18040-18041]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7600]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2010-1209; Airspace Docket No. 10-ANM-10]

Amendment of Class E Airspace; West Yellowstone, MT

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action will modify Class E airspace at Yellowstone
Airport, West Yellowstone, MT, to accommodate aircraft using Instrument
Landing System (ILS) Localizer (LOC) standard instrument approach
procedures at Yellowstone Airport. This will improve the safety and
management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Effective date, 0901 UTC, June 30, 2011. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR Part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On January 20, 2011, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to amend controlled airspace at West
Yellowstone, MT (76 FR 3569). Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on
the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.9U dated August 18, 2010, and effective September 15,
2010, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in that Order.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
Part 71 by amending Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface, at Yellowstone Airport, to accommodate IFR aircraft
executing ILS LOC standard instrument approach procedures at the
airport. This action is necessary for the safety and management of IFR
operations. With the exception of an editorial change to the regulatory
text, this rule is the same as that proposed in the NPRM.
    The FAA has determined this regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments
are necessary to keep them operationally current. Therefore, this
regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The FAA's authority to
issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the U.S.
Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106 discusses the authority of the FAA
Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency's authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to
ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority as it creates
additional controlled airspace at Yellowstone Airport, West
Yellowstone, MT.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR Part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9U, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 18, 2010, and effective September 15,
2010 is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ANM MT E5 West Yellowstone, MT [Amended]

West Yellowstone, Yellowstone Airport, MT
    (Lat. 44[deg]41'18'' N., long. 111[deg]07'04'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within 4.3 miles west and 8.3 miles east of the 026[deg] and
206[deg] bearings of the Yellowstone Airport extending from 8.3
miles northeast to 23.3 miles southwest of the Yellowstone Airport;
that airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface
within 6.6 miles west and 11 miles east of the 209[deg] bearing from
lat. 44[deg]34'32'' N., long. 111[deg]11'51'' W. extending to 36.2
miles southwest, and within 5 miles north and 4.3 miles south of the
304[deg] bearing from lat. 44[deg]34'32'' N., long. 111[deg]11'51''
W. extending to the east edge of V-343; that airspace extending
upward from 10,700 feet MSL within a 25.3-mile radius of lat.
44[deg]34'32'' N., long. 111[deg]11'51'' W. extending clockwise from
the 081[deg] bearing from lat. 44[deg]34'32'' N., long.
111[deg]11'51'' W. to 4.3 miles east of the 236[deg] bearing from
lat. 44[deg]34'32'' N., long. 111[deg]11'51'' W.; and within 4.3
miles each side of the 236[deg] bearing from lat. 44[deg]34'32'' N.,
long. 111[deg]11'51'' W. extending to 43.5 miles southwest; that
airspace extending upward from 10,700 feet MSL within 9 miles south
and 5 miles north of the 304[deg] bearing from lat. 44[deg]34'32''
N., long. 111[deg]11'51'' W. extending to the east edge of V-343;
that airspace extending upward from 12,000 feet MSL within a 30.5-
mile radius of lat. 44[deg]34'32'' N., long. 111[deg]11'51'' W.
extending clockwise from the 026[deg] bearing from lat.
44[deg]34'32'' N., long. 111[deg]11'51'' W. to the 081[deg] bearing
from lat. 44[deg]34'32'' N., long. 111[deg]11'51'' W.; that airspace
extending upward from 12,500 feet MSL within 4.3 miles each side of
the 293[deg], 329[deg] and 043[deg] bearing from lat. 45[deg]00'19''
N., long. 110[deg]53'49'' W. extending to 25.16 miles west to 30.57
miles northwest to 54.24 miles north, and within 4.3 miles each side
of the 312[deg] bearing from lat. 44[deg]31'10'' N., long.
111[deg]14'03'' W. extending to 25.20 miles northwest, excluding
those portions that overlie the east edge of V-343, and south edge
of V-2 and V-86; that airspace extending upward from 13,000 feet MSL
within a 30.5-mile radius of lat. 44[deg]34'32'' N., long.
111[deg]11'51'' W.; extending clockwise from the 313[deg] bearing to
the 026[deg] bearing from lat. 44[deg]34'32'' N., long.
111[deg]11'51'' W.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on March 21, 2011.
Christine Mellon,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center
[FR Doc. 2011-7600 Filed 3-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34698-34699]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12219]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2022-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2223]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency; Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 15, 2022, FEMA published in the Federal Register a
proposed flood hazard determination notice that contained an erroneous
table. This notice provides corrections to that table to be used in
lieu of the erroneous information. The table provided here represents
the proposed flood hazard determinations and communities affected for
Van Buren County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions) and Lucas County, Ohio,
and Incorporated Areas.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before September 6, 2022.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), and where
applicable, the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report for each community
are available for inspection at both the online location and the
respective Community Map Repository address listed in the table below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-2223 to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email) [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected]; or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed in the table below, in
accordance with Section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of
1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own, or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP may only be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at https://floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_fact_sheet.pdf.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the table below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard determinations shown on the Preliminary FIRM and
FIS report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR
67.6(b) is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations will also be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
are made final.

Correction

    In the proposed flood hazard determination notice published at 87
FR 14551 in the March 15, 2022, issue of the Federal Register, FEMA
published tables titled ``Van Buren County, Michigan (All
Jurisdictions)'' and ``Lucas County, Ohio, and Incorporated Areas''.
The table titled ``Van Buren County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions)''
contained inaccurate information as to the community name and community
map repository for Charter Township of South Haven, Michigan featured
in the table. The table titled ``Lucas County, Ohio and Incorporated
Area'' contained inaccurate information as to the communities affected
by the proposed flood hazard determinations featured in

the table. In this document, FEMA is publishing a table containing the
accurate information. The information provided below should be used in
lieu of that previously published.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Van Buren County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions)
         Project: 13-05-4211S Preliminary Date: August 18, 2021
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City Of South Haven....................  City Hall, 539 Phoenix Street,
                                          South Haven, MI 49090.
Township Of Covert.....................  Township Hall, 73943 East Lake
                                          Street, Covert, MI 49043.
Charter Township of South Haven........  Township Hall, 09761 Blue Star
                                          Memorial Highway, South Haven,
                                          MI 49090.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Lucas County, Ohio and Incorporated Areas
     Project: 13-05-1800S Revised Preliminary Date: December 3, 2021
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Toledo.........................  Department of Inspection, One
                                          Government Center, Suite 1600,
                                          Toledo, OH 43604.
Unincorporated Areas of Lucas County...  Lucas County Engineer's Office,
                                          1049 South McCord Road,
                                          Holland, OH 43528.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2022-12219 Filed 6-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P