[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20511-20512]
[FR Doc No: 2023-07222]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:
    Docket Numbers: EG23-112-000.
    Applicants: AES ES Westwing, LLC.
    Description: AES ES Westwing, LLC submits Notice of Self-
Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5448.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER10-1776-007.
    Applicants: Leaning Juniper Wind Power II LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing to Reflect
Participation in the CAISO's Western EIM to be effective 3/24/2023.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5198.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2824-007.
    Applicants: Big Horn Wind Project LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing to Reflect
Participation in the CAISO's Western EIM to be effective 3/24/2023.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5128.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2825-008.
    Applicants: Big Horn II Wind Project LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing to Reflect
Participation in the CAISO's Western EIM to be effective 3/24/2023.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5138.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2957-008.
    Applicants: Hay Canyon Wind LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing to Reflect
Participation in the CAISO's Western EIM to be effective 3/24/2023.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5152.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2995-008.
    Applicants: Juniper Canyon Wind Power LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing to Reflect
Participation in the CAISO's Western EIM to be effective 3/24/2023.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5156.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2996-007.
    Applicants: Klamath Energy LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing to Reflect
Participation in the CAISO's Western EIM to be effective 3/24/2023.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5169.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2999-007.
    Applicants: Klondike Wind Power LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing to Reflect
Participation in the CAISO's Western EIM to be effective 3/24/2023.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5178.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3000-007.
    Applicants: Klondike Wind Power II LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing to Reflect
Participation in the CAISO's Western EIM to be effective 3/24/2023.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5188.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3009-009.
    Applicants: Pebble Springs Wind LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing to Reflect
Participation in the CAISO's Western EIM to be effective 3/24/2023.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5205.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3013-008.
    Applicants: Star Point Wind Project LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing to Reflect
Participation in the CAISO's Western EIM to be effective 3/24/2023.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5216.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3029-007.
    Applicants: Klondike Wind Power III LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing to Reflect
Participation in the CAISO's Western EIM to be effective 3/24/2023.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5193.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-1250-018.
    Applicants: Avangrid Renewables, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing to Reflect
Participation in the CAISO's Western EIM to be effective 3/24/2023.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5073.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2360-006.
    Applicants: Montague Wind Power Facility, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing to Reflect
Participation in the CAISO's Western EIM to be effective 3/24/2023.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5006.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1128-001.
    Applicants: Black Hills Power, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: Order No. 864 Supplemental
Compliance Filing to be effective 1/27/2020.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5439.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2272-005.
    Applicants: Golden Hills Wind Farm, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing to Reflect
Participation in the CAISO's Western EIM to be effective 3/24/2023.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5003.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2748-004.
    Applicants: Lund Hill Solar, LLC, Bracewell LLP.
    Description: Compliance filing: Lund Hill Solar, LLC submits tariff
filing per 35: Compliance Filing to Reflect Participation in the
CAISO's Western EIM to be effective 3/24/2023.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5004.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2847-005.
    Applicants: Montague Solar, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing to Reflect
Participation in the CAISO's Western EIM to be effective 3/24/2023.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5005.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-616-003.
    Applicants: Dressor Plains Solar, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing ER22-616-000 to
be effective 2/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5108.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-962-002.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: Order No. 2222 30-Day Compliance
Filing to be effective 2/2/2026.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5248.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2173-004.
    Applicants: Bakeoven Solar, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing to Reflect
Participation in the CAISO's Western EIM to be effective 3/24/2023.
    Filed Date: 3/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230331-5001.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/21/23.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 31, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-07222 Filed 4-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 199)]
[Notices]
[Page 63526-63528]
[DOCID:fr15oc10-149]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63070; File No. SR-Phlx-2010-129]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Rebates and Fees for Adding and Removing Liquidity

October 8, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 27, 2010, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its Rebates and Fees for Adding and
Removing Liquidity in Select Symbols to amend its current fees for
removing liquidity and also add certain fees to apply to Complex
Orders.
    While changes to the Exchange's Fee Schedule pursuant to this
proposal are effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated this
proposal to be effective for trades settling on or after October 1,
2010.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/micro.aspx?id=PHLXfilings, at
the principal office of the Exchange, at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, and on the Commission's Web site at http://www.sec.gov.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to incentivize Broker-
Dealers that route Customer orders to use the Exchange's enhanced
automated opening system \3\ as well as to route Complex Order volume
to the Exchange. The increased Customer volume should benefit market
makers \4\ and other Broker-Dealers engaged in proprietary trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Exchange Rule 1017(l).
    \4\ The Exchange market maker category includes Specialists (see
Rule 1020) and Registered Options Traders (Rule 1014(b)(i) and (ii),
which includes Streaming Quote Traders or SQTs (see Rule
1014(b)(ii)(A)) and Remote Streaming Quote Traders or RSQTs (see
Rule 1014(b)(ii)(B)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is proposing to amend its current Rebates and Fees for
Adding and Removing Liquidity in Select

Symbols to apply only to single contra-side orders, which will now be
part A of Section I of the Fee Schedule. The Select Symbols currently
listed on the Fee Schedule will remain the same.\5\ The Exchange is
proposing to increase the Directed Participant and Specialist, ROT, SQT
and RSQT Fee for Removing Liquidity to $0.33 per contract. Currently,
Directed Participants are assessed a $0.30 per contract Fee for
Removing Liquidity and Specialists, ROTs, SQTs and RSQTs are assessed a
$0.32 per contract Fee for Removing Liquidity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Rebates and Fees for Adding and Removing Liquidity in
Select Symbols will continue to apply only to electronic orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is also proposing to add separate Rebates and Fees for
Adding and Removing Liquidity in Select Symbols for the electronically
executed Complex Order \6\ side of any transaction as a new part B of
Section I of the Fee Schedule. The Exchange is proposing to pay a
Rebate for Adding Liquidity and assess a Fee for Removing Liquidity,
which would apply only to the Complex Order side of a transaction. For
example, one component of a Complex Order is a buy order that trades
with a ``simple'' or non-Complex Order sell order, the sell order is
subject to the fees in part A of Section I of the Fee Schedule and the
buy order is subject to the fees in new part B of Section I of the Fee
Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ A complex order strategy means any Complex Order involving
any option series which is priced at a net debit or credit (based on
the relative prices of each component). The Exchange will calculate
both a bid price and an offer price for each complex order strategy
based on the current PBBO (as defined below) for each component of
the Complex Order and the bid/ask differential for each component.
See Exchange Rule 1080, Commentary .08(a)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed fees are as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Specialist,
                                Customer      Directed    ROT, SQT and      Firm         Broker-    Professional
                                             participant      RSQT                       dealer
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rebate for Adding Liquidity.         $0.22         $0.25         $0.23         $0.10         $0.10         $0.20
Fee for Removing Liquidity..          0.25          0.25          0.27          0.27          0.35          0.27
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to apply these fees above as follows:
     Customer Complex Orders would receive the Rebate for
Adding Liquidity when those orders are electronically executed against
a [sic] \7\ Customer contra-side order with the same Complex Order
strategy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Commission notes that the Exhibit 5 attached to the form
19b-4 states that ``Customer Complex Orders will receive the Rebate
for Adding Liquidity when electronically executed against a non-
Customer contra-side order with the same Complex Order Strategy.''
(Emphasis added).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Customer Complex Orders that are executed against a
Customer contra-side order with the same Complex Order strategy would
not be assessed the Fee for Removing Liquidity.
     A Professional, Directed Participant, Firm, Broker-Dealer
and Specialist, ROT, SQT and RSQT would be assessed the Fees for
Removing Liquidity when those orders are executed against a contra-side
order with the same Complex Order strategy.
     A single contra-side order that is executed against the
individual components of a Complex Order would be assessed the fees in
Part A of this Section.
     The individual components of a Complex Order would be
assessed the fees in Part B of this Section.
    The following would continue to apply to the fees designated as
Parts A and B:
     The Monthly Cap on transaction fees that are currently
applicable to ROTs and Specialists transacting equity options will not
be applicable to the Select Symbols.
     The Firm Related Equity Option Cap will not be applicable
to the Select Symbols.
     The Market Access Provider (``MAP'') Subsidy will not
apply to electronic transactions in the Select Symbols.
     Payment for Order Flow fees will not be collected on
transactions in the Select Symbols.
     The Options Floor Broker Subsidy will be applicable to
qualifying transactions in the Select Symbols (see Options Floor Broker
Subsidy Fees).
     The Cancellation Fee will continue to apply to the Select
Symbols.
     Transactions in the Select Symbols executed via open
outcry will be subject to the Equity Options Fees (see Equity Options
Fees in Section II). However, if one side of the transaction is
executed using the Options Floor Broker Management System and any other
side of the trade was the result of an electronically submitted order
or a quote, then these fees will apply to the FBMS contracts and
contracts that are executed electronically on all sides of the
transaction.
    The Exchange is removing the following language, which previously
related to Complex Orders for fees in Section I: ``Regular Equity
Option transaction fees will apply to Complex Orders that are
electronically executed against a contra-side order with the same
Complex Order Strategy.'' Also, the following language is proposed to
be deleted: ``Single contra-side orders that are executed against the
individual components of Complex Orders will be charged according to
the above fees. The individual components of such a Complex Order will
be charged according to the above fees.'' Because Complex Orders are
now part B of this Fee Schedule, this language is no longer necessary.
    The Exchange is proposing to amend the application of the Rebates
and Fees for Adding and Removing Liquidity in Select Symbols, Section
I, to its opening and auction processes by adopting new part C.
Currently, Section I does not apply to contracts executed during the
Exchange's opening process,\8\ except for the Firm and the Broker-
Dealer Fee for Removing Liquidity. Also, currently, Customer,
Professional, Directed Participant, and Specialist, ROT, SQT and RSQT
Fees for Removing Liquidity do not apply to transactions resulting from
electronic auctions.\9\ Firm and Broker-Dealer Fees for Removing
Liquidity do apply to transactions resulting from electronic auctions.
Customer, Professional, Directed Participant, and Specialist, ROT, SQT
and RSQT Rebates for Adding Liquidity do not apply to transactions
resulting from electronic auctions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Exchange Rule 1017, Openings in Options.
    \9\ Electronic auctions include, without limitation, the Complex
Order Live Auction (``COLA''), and Quote and Market Exhaust
auctions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is proposing to amend the fees that apply to all
electronic auctions, including the Exchange's opening process. The
Exchange proposes that a Customer would receive a Rebate for Adding
Liquidity in an electronic auction and during the Exchange's opening
process, except when such Customer order is contra to another Customer
order. A Customer would not be assessed a Fee for Removing Liquidity in
an electronic auction and during the Exchange's opening process. The
Exchange also proposes that Professional, Directed

Participant, Firm, Broker-Dealer and Specialist, ROT, SQT and RSQT Fees
for Removing Liquidity would apply to transactions resulting from
electronic auctions and the Exchange's opening process.
    While changes to the Exchange's Fee Schedule pursuant to this
proposal are effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated this
proposal to be effective for trades settling on or after October 1,
2010.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its schedule of
fees is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \10\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \11\ in
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees
and other charges among Exchange members and other persons using its
facilities. The Exchange's proposal to assess separate fees for Complex
and non-Complex Orders in Section I of its Fee Schedule is consistent
with industry fees that allow for different rates to be charged for
different order types originated by dissimilarly classified market
participants.\12\ The Exchange believes that this amendment to the fees
is both reasonable and equitable because the fees are within the range
assessed other market participants and are similar to fees being
assessed by the International Securities Exchange, LLC (``ISE'') for
complex order executions.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62805 (August 31,
2010), 75 FR 54682 (September 8, 2010) (SR-ISE-2010-90).
    \13\ See ISE's Schedule of Fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to pay a Rebate for Adding Liquidity to
Customers when such transaction is contra to a non-Customer order
during an electronic auction and opening processes. Similarly, the
Exchange proposes to not assess a fee to a Customer during such
processes. The Exchange also proposes to apply the Fee for Removing
Liquidity to all non-Customer market participants equally during
electronic auction or opening processes. The Exchange believes that
these proposals are both reasonable and equitable because they should
incentivize Customer orders and attract additional order flow to the
Exchange. Also, all other participants are equally assessed the
applicable Fees for Removing Liquidity.
    The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily direct order flow to competing venues
if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive. The
Exchange believes that the fees it charges for options overlying the
various Select Symbols remain competitive with fees charged by other
venues and therefore continue to be reasonable and equitably allocated
to those members that opt to direct orders to the Exchange rather than
competing venues.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\14\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2010-129 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2010-129. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/
shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-2010-129 and should be
submitted on or before November 5, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25984 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


This document is protected under FIFRA. Document may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act at Http://www.epa/pesticide/foia but access is restricted to entities not engaged in the production sale or distribution of pesticides outside the United States.


			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

			Issued by the Department of Transportation on June 11, 2003

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2002-12475

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Applicant:  Laker Airways (Bahamas) Limited						Date Filed: May 14,
2003

Relief requested:  Renew exemption from 49 U.S.C. 41301 to conduct
scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail
between Freeport, The Bahamas, and St. Louis, MO, on a coterminal basis
with currently authorized U.S.-Bahamas services.

If renewal, date and citation of last action:  June 14, 2002, in this
docket.

Applicant representative:  Pierre Murphy<PHONE_NUMBER>		DOT analyst:
Shelita Smith<PHONE_NUMBER>

Responsive pleadings: None

	DISPOSITION

Action:  Approved									Action date:  June 11, 2003

Effective dates of authority granted:  June 11, 2003 – June 11, 2004

Basis for approval (bilateral agreement/reciprocity):  Reciprocity

Except to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to the
terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

_X_ Standard exemption conditions (attached)        _X_ Foreign air
carrier permit conditions (Order 96-6-45)

Special conditions/Partial grant/Denial basis/Remarks:

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		      Office of International Aviation

________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________

We found that the applicant was qualified to perform its proposed
operations.

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that  (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (3) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted/deferred/dismissed, we denied all requests in
the referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority
granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

Foreign Carrier Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the foreign carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Not conduct any operations unless it holds a currently effective
authorization from its homeland for such operations, and it has filed a
copy of such authorization with the Department;

(2)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration, including, but not limited to, 14 CFR Parts 129, 91, and
36, and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning
security;1

(3)  Comply with the requirements for minimum insurance coverage
contained in 14 CFR Part 205, and, prior to the commencement of any
operations under this authority, file evidence of such coverage, in the
form of a completed OST Form 6411, with the Federal Aviation
Administration’s Program Management Branch (AFS-260), Flight Standards
Service (any changes to, or termination of, insurance also shall be
filed with that office);

(4)  Not operate aircraft under this authority unless it complies with
operational safety requirements at least equivalent to Annex 6 of the
Chicago Convention;

(5)  Conform to the airworthiness and airman competency requirements of
its Government for international air services;

(6)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 203,
concerning waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(7)  Agree that operations under this authority constitute a waiver of
sovereign immunity, for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1605(a), but only with
respect to those actions or proceedings instituted against it in any
court or other tribunal in the United States that are: (a)  based on its
operations in international air transportation that, according to the
contract of carriage, include a point in the United States as a point of
origin, point of destination, or agreed stopping place, or for which the
contract of carriage was purchased in the United States; or (b)  based
on a claim under any international agreement or treaty cognizable in any
court or other tribunal of the United States.  In this condition, the
term "international air transportation" means "international
transportation" as defined by the Warsaw Convention, except that all
States shall be considered to be High Contracting Parties for the
purpose of this definition;

(8)  Except as specifically authorized by the Department, originate or
terminate all flights to/from the United States in its homeland;

(9)  Comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 217, concerning the
reporting of scheduled, nonscheduled, and charter data;

(10) If charter operations are authorized, except as otherwise provided
in the applicable aviation agreement, comply with the Department's rules
governing charters (including 14 CFR Parts 212 and 380); and

(11) Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department, with all applicable orders or regulations of other U.S.
agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the United States.

This authority shall not be effective during any period when the holder
is not in compliance with the conditions imposed above.  Moreover, this
authority cannot be sold or otherwise transferred without explicit
Department approval under Title 49 of the U.S. Code.

____________________________

1 To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, the holder should, before commencing any new
service (including charter flights) from a foreign airport that would be
the holder’s last point of departure for the United States, contact
its Principal Security Inspector (PSI) to advise the PSI of its plans
and to find out whether the Transportation Security Administration has
determined that security is adequate to allow such airport(s) to be
served.

06/2003


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 161 (Friday, August 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51960-51961]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21207]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IC11-512-001]

Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-512); Comment
Request; Submitted for OMB Review

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of section 3507 of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507, the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC) has submitted the
information collection described below to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review of the information collection requirements. Any
interested person may file comments directly with OMB and should
address a copy of those comments to the Commission as explained below.
The Commission issued a Notice in the Federal Register (76 FR 30930,
05/27/2011) requesting public comments. FERC received no comments on
the FERC-512 and has made this notation in its submission to OMB.

DATES: Comments in consideration of the collection of information are
due September 19, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be filed either electronically (eFiled) or in
paper format, and should refer to Docket No. IC11-512-000. Documents
must be prepared in an acceptable filing format and in compliance with
Commission submission guidelines at: http://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide.asp. eFiling instructions are available at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. First time users must follow
eRegister instructions at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/eregistration.asp, to establish a username and password before eFiling.
The Commission will send an automatic acknowledgement to the sender's
e-mail address upon receipt of eFiled comments. Commenters making an
eFiling should not make a paper filing. Commenters that are not able to
file electronically must send an original of their comments to: Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    Users interested in receiving automatic notification of activity in
this docket may do so through eSubscription at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp. In addition, all comments and FERC
issuances may be viewed, printed or downloaded remotely through FERC's
eLibrary at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp, by searching
on Docket No. IC11-512. For user assistance, contact FERC Online
Support by e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by phone at: (866)
208-3676 (toll-free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> for TTY.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Brown may be reached by e-mail
at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, and fax at
(202) 273-0873.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information collected under the
requirements of FERC-512, ``Application for Preliminary Permit'' (OMB
No. 1902-0073), is used by the Commission to implement the statutory
provisions of Sections 4(f), 5 and 7 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16
U.S.C. sections 797, 798 & 800. The purpose of obtaining a preliminary
permit is to maintain priority of the application for a license for a
hydropower facility while the applicant conducts surveys to prepare
maps, plans, specifications and estimates; conducts engineering,
economic and environmental feasibility studies; and making financial
arrangements. The conditions under which the priority will be
maintained are set forth in each permit. During the term of the permit,
no other application for a preliminary permit or application for a
license submitted by another party can be accepted. The term of the
permit is three years. The information collected under the designation
FERC-512 is in the form of a written application for a preliminary
permit which is used by Commission staff to determine an applicant's
qualifications to hold a preliminary permit, review the proposed hydro
development for feasibility and to issue a notice of the application in
order to solicit public and agency comments. The Commission implements
these mandatory filing requirements in the Code of Federal

Regulations (CFR) under 18 CFR 4.31-4.33, 4.81-4.83.
    Action: The Commission is requesting a three-year extension of the
current expiration date, with no changes to the existing collection of
data.
    Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this collection is
estimated as:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Number of      Average burden
               Number of respondents annually                 responses per       hours per       Total annual
                                                                respondent        response        burden hours
(1)                                                                     (2)               (3)       (1)x(2)x(3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
200........................................................               1                37             7,400
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated cost burden to respondents is $508,000; [i.e., (7 hours
@$200 an hour (legal) x 200 respondents) + (30 hours @$38 an hour
(technical) x 200 respondents)] per year equals $508,000)]. The average
annual cost burden per respondent is $2,540 ($508,000/200 = $2,540).
    The reporting burden includes the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide the information including: (1) Reviewing instructions; (2)
developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems
for the purposes of collecting, validating, verifying, processing,
maintaining, disclosing and providing information; (3) adjusting the
existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and
requirements; (4) training personnel to respond to a collection of
information; (5) searching data sources; (6) completing and reviewing
the collection of information; and (7) transmitting, or otherwise
disclosing the information.
    The estimate of cost for respondents is based upon salaries for
professional and clerical support, as well as direct and indirect
overhead costs. Direct costs include all costs directly attributable to
providing this information, such as administrative costs and the cost
for information technology. Indirect or overhead costs are costs
incurred by an organization in support of its mission. These costs
apply to activities which benefit the whole organization rather than
anyone particular function or activity.
    Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.

    Dated: August 15, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-21207 Filed 8-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: August 8, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 152)]
[Notices]
[Page 44507]
[DOCID:fr08au07-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PL07-2-000]

Composition of Proxy Groups for Determining Gas and Oil Pipeline
Return on Equity

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.

ACTION: Proposed policy statement; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects an error in the Proposed Policy
Statement that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission published in
the Federal Register on July 31, 2007. The Proposed Policy Statement
had an incorrect reply comment date.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 1, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John M. Robinson (Legal Information),
Office of the General Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at
(202) 502-6806.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Document E7-14708, published July 31,
2007 (72 FR 41744) make the following correction to the Dates: section
of the preamble language.
    On page 41744, column 1, the reply comment date is corrected to
read as follows: ``Reply comments are due on September 19, 2007.''

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-15390 Filed 8-7-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 17, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34247-34250]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15134]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-86352; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2019-044]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
Relating To Amend the Fee Schedule Applicable to Members and Non-
Members of the Exchange Pursuant to EDGX Rules 15.1(a) and (c)

July 11, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on July 1, 2019, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX'') is filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed
rule change to amend the fee schedule applicable to Members and non-
Members \3\ of the Exchange pursuant to EDGX Rules 15.1(a) and (c). The
text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ A Member is defined as ``any registered broker or dealer
that has been admitted to membership in the Exchange.'' See Exchange
Rule 1.5(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (http://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule applicable to its
options trading platform (``EDGX Options'') in connection with the fee
assessed for Customer orders in Mini-SPX Index (``XSP'') options
(yielding fee code XC), as well as add certain XSP-related fee codes to
the Automated Improvement Mechanism (``AIM'') Pricing table, effective
July 1, 2019.
    The Exchange currently provides a standard rebate of $0.05 for
Customer orders in XSP (an Exchange proprietary product). The Exchange
no longer wishes to provide a rebate for Customer XSP transactions and
now proposes to remove the current rebate and amend the fee schedule so
that Customer orders in XSP will be free. The Exchange notes that it
currently assesses no charge or a marginal charge on other Customer
transactions. For example, the Exchange does not charge a transaction
fee for Customer Agency orders in an AIM auction (including Customer-
to-Customer orders and AIM Agency orders in XSP), for certain Customer
complex orders (including complex orders leg into the Simple Book and
Customer-to-Customer complex orders), and Qualified Contingent Cross
(``QCC'') orders (both Agency and Contra QCC orders).
    In addition to this, the Exchange also proposes to add the fee
codes for AIM-related orders in XSP to Footnote 6 and add references to
the fee codes in the AIM Pricing table under Footnote 6. This includes
fee code XD, appended to Customer AIM orders in XSP, and fee code XB,
appended to Customer-to-Customer Immediate Cross AIM orders in XSP. The
AIM Pricing table summarizes AIM fees and rebates for orders that
transact in an AIM Auction (specifically, orders that yield fee codes,

BA, \4\ BB, \5\ BC, \6\ BD, \7\ BE, \8\ and CC, \9\ already provided
for in the Fee Codes and Associated Fees section of the fee schedule,
in a table form and includes a provision regarding AIM Break-Up Credits
for such orders (as described below). By way of background, AIM
includes functionality in which a Member (an ``Initiating Member'') may
electronically submit for execution an order it represents as agent on
behalf of a Priority Customer,\10\ broker dealer, or any other person
or entity (``Agency Order'') against principal interest or against any
other order it represents as agent (an ``Initiating Order'') provided
it submits the Agency Order for electronic execution into the AIM
Auction pursuant Rule 21.19. All options traded on EDGX Options are
eligible for AIM. The Exchange notes that any person or entity other
than the Initiating Member may submit responses to an Auction. An AIM
Auction takes into account responses to the Auction as well as interest
resting on the Exchange's order book at the conclusion of the auction
(``unrelated orders''), regardless of whether such unrelated orders
were already present on the Exchange's order book when the Agency Order
was received by the Exchange or were received after the Exchange
commenced the applicable Auction. If contracts remain from one or more
unrelated orders at the time the Auction ends, they will be considered
for participation in the AIM order allocation process. The Exchange
also applies an AIM Break-Up Credit to the Member that submits an AIM
Agency Order, including a Member who routes an order to the Exchange
with a Designated Give Up, when the AIM Agency Order trades with an AIM
Responder Order. Currently, the AIM Break-Up Credit provided with
respect to an AIM Auction in a Penny Pilot Security is $0.25 per
contract and the AIM Break-Up Credit provided with respect to an AIM
Auction in a Non-Penny Pilot Security is $0.60 per contract.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Fee code BA is appended to Non-Customer AIM orders and is
assessed a fee of $0.20 per share.
    \5\ Fee code BB is appended to AIM Contra orders and is assessed
a fee of $0.05 per share.
    \6\ Fee code BC is appended to AIM Agency Customer orders and is
provided a rebate of $0.14 per share.
    \7\ Fee code BD is appended to AIM Responder Penny Pilot orders
and is assessed a fee of $0.50 per share.
    \8\ Fee code BE is appended to AIM Responder Non-Penny Pilot
orders and is assessed a fee of $1.05 per share.
    \9\ Fee code CC is appended to AIM Customer-to-Customer
Immediate Cross orders and is free.
    \10\ The term ``Priority Customer'' means any person or entity
that is not: (A) A broker or dealer in securities; or (B) a
Professional. The term ``Priority Customer Order'' means an order
for the account of a Priority Customer. See Rule 16.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In April 2019, the Exchange added to its fee schedule certain fee
codes related to orders in XSP, including for Customer AIM orders in
XSP (yielding fee code XD) and AIM Customer-to-Customer Immediate Cross
orders in XSP (orders yielding fee code XB). At this time, however, the
Exchange inadvertently neglected to add such AIM-related Customer XSP
fee codes to the AIM Pricing table and adopt AIM Break-Up Credits for
orders yielding XB and XD. The Exchange now proposes to add these fee
codes to Footnote 6, including adding references in the AIM Pricing
table in order to provide additional clarity to Members regarding AIM-
related Customer orders in XSP, as well as apply the AIM Break-Up
Credit to orders yielding fee codes XD and XB. As stated, the AIM
Pricing table merely summarizes AIM fees and rebates for orders
yielding certain fee codes, that are already provided for in the Fee
Codes and Associated Fees section of the fee schedule, and the AIM
Break-Up Credit already applies to the other AIM-related orders found
within the Fee Codes and Associated Fees section.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6 of the Act,\11\ in general, and furthers the
requirements of Section 6(b)(4),\12\ in particular, as it is designed
to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate
between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that its proposed change to assess no charge
for Customer transactions in XSP is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of
the Act in that the proposal is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory. The Exchange believes that it is reasonable and
equitable to assess no charge for Customer transactions in XSP because
Customers won't have to pay any fee for XSP transactions. Moreover, it
is in line with multiple other types of Customer orders for which the
Exchange does not assess a fee. As described above, the Exchange
currently does not charge a transaction fee for various other Customer
orders in an AIM auction, various Customer complex orders, nor for
Customer QCC orders. The Exchange believes that, although it is
eliminating the rebate for Customer XSP orders, the proposal to not
assess any fees for such transactions will continue to incentivize
Customer order flow in XSP, which enhances liquidity on the Exchange.
This enhanced Customer liquidity benefits all market participants by
providing more trading opportunities, which attracts Market Makers. An
increase in Market Maker activity in turn facilitates tighter spreads,
which may cause an additional corresponding increase in order flow from
other market participants.
    The Exchange also believes that the proposed Customer transaction
fee is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the proposed
fee assessment (of no charge) will apply equally to all Customer
transactions in XSP, i.e., all Customers will be assessed the same
amount. Moreover, the Exchange notes that while Customer's will not be
assessed any fees, as compared to other market participants,\13\ the
Exchange believes that the proposal to not assess any fee is equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because, as stated above, Customer
order flow enhances liquidity on the Exchange, in turn providing more
trading opportunities and attracting Marker-Makers to facilitate
tighter spreads to the benefit of all market participants. Moreover,
the options industry has a long history of providing preferential
pricing to Customers, and the Exchange's current Fee Schedule currently
does so in many places, as do the fees structures of multiple other
exchanges.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See EDGX Options Fee Schedule, ``Fee Codes and Associated
Fees'', which assesses a fee of $0.45 for all Firm orders in XSP,
$0.20 for all Market Maker liquidity adding orders in XSP, and $0.48
for all Non-Market Maker/Non-Customer orders in XSP.
    \14\ See MIAX Options Fee Schedule, Transaction Fees, SPIKES,
which gives preferential Customer [sic] treatment for transaction in
MIAX Option's proprietary product, SPIKES. The Exchange notes XSP is
an Exchange proprietary product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    That Exchange also believes that its proposed change to add fee
codes XD and XB to the AIM Pricing table is consistent with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act in that the proposal is reasonable, equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory. The Exchange believes that the proposed
change is reasonable because it serves to update the AIM Pricing chart
as a result of an inadvertent oversight. As stated, in April 2019, the
Exchange added to its fee schedule certain fee codes related to orders
in XSP, including for Customer AIM orders in XSP (yielding fee code XD)
and AIM Customer-to-Customer Immediate Cross orders in XSP (orders
yielding fee code XB), yet inadvertently failed to add such AIM-related
Customer XSP fee codes to Footnote 6

at that time (which includes the applicability of the AIM Break-Up
Credit under Footnote 6). In addition to this, the Exchange notes that
the AIM Pricing table merely summarizes in table form AIM fees and
rebates for orders yielding certain AIM-related fee codes, that are
already provided for in the Fee Codes and Associated Fees section of
the fee schedule (which currently includes fee codes XD and XB).
Therefore, the Exchange believes that the proposed change to add these
fee codes to the AIM Pricing table will provide additional clarity to
Members by summarizing in table form the rates for their AIM-related
orders in XSP, which already exist within the fee schedule. Moreover,
the Exchange notes that the proposed AIM Break-Up Credits currently
apply to the other AIM-related orders provided for in the Fee Codes and
Associated Fees section.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed change to add fee codes XD
and XB to the AIM Pricing chart is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the rates for such orders yielding these fee
codes are already in place, and the proposed change will not alter
those rates or descriptions for such orders for any type of market
participant. Instead, this change serves to provide additional clarity
for all Members by adding these AIM-related fee codes to the summary
table for AIM Pricing.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not
believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Specifically, the Exchange does not believe that
the proposed change will impose any burden on intramarket competitions
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act because the proposed change will apply uniformly to all
Customers transacting in XSP. As described above, while no fee will be
assessed for Customers, different market participants have different
circumstances, such as the fact that preferential pricing to Customers
is a long-standing options industry practice which serves to enhance
Customer order flow, thereby attracting Marker-Makers to facilitate
tighter spreads and trading opportunities to the benefit of all market
participants. In addition to this, the Exchange notes that it currently
assesses no charge for various other types of Customer orders.
    In addition to this, the Exchange does not believe that the
proposed change to add fee codes appended to AIM-related orders in XSP,
which currently exist in the fee schedule, to Footnote 6 will impose a
burden on intramarket competition. The AIM Pricing table merely
summarizes the fees and rebates for AIM-related orders that are
currently found in the fee schedule and the proposed change serves to
provide additional clarity regarding existing AIM-related orders in XSP
by adding them to this table. Additionally, the AIM Break-Up Credits
currently apply to the other AIM-related orders found within the fee
schedule and the proposal to adopt AIM Break-Up Credits for orders
yielding XD and XB will result in such orders being treated the same as
all other AIM-related orders.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the rule
change affects a proprietary product, which is traded exclusively on
the Exchange and the Exchange's affiliate, Cboe Exchange, Inc.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Cboe Exchange, Inc. Fees Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \16\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \17\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2019-044 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2019-044. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2019-044 and should be
submitted on or before August 7, 2019.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-15134 Filed 7-16-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 139 (Friday, July 19, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 34882]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15375]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC19-113-000.
    Applicants: Golden State Water Company.
    Description: Application for Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act, et al. of Golden State Water Company.
    Filed Date: 7/12/19.
    Accession Number: 20190712-5112.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/19.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1887-001.
    Applicants: Emera Maine.
    Description: Compliance filing: Amendment to Order 845 Compliance
Filing to be effective 5/20/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/15/19.
    Accession Number: 20190715-5044.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/5/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1955-001.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of New Mexico.
    Description: Compliance filing: Order No. 845 Deficiency Letter
Response to be effective 5/22/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/12/19.
    Accession Number: 20190712-5155.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2373-000.
    Applicants: Ashtabula Wind I, LLC.
    Description: Amendment to July 10, 2019 Ashtabula Wind I, LLC
tariff filing.
    Filed Date: 7/11/19.
    Accession Number: 20190711-5155.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/1/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2391-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Florida, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: DEF-FMPA NITSA (SA No. 148)
Amendment to be effective 7/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/12/19.
    Accession Number: 20190712-5103.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2392-000.
    Applicants: Chief Conemaugh Power II, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Reactive Power Tariff
Application to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 7/12/19.
    Accession Number: 20190712-5105.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2393-000.
    Applicants: Chief Keystone Power II, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Reactive Power Tariff
Application to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 7/12/19.
    Accession Number: 20190712-5108.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2394-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to WMPA, SA No.
3915; Queue No. Y2-042/Z2-104 (amend) to be effective 6/19/2015.
    Filed Date: 7/12/19.
    Accession Number: 20190712-5109.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2395-000.
    Applicants: AES Integrated Energy, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: AES Integrated Tariff
Amendment to be effective 9/11/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/12/19.
    Accession Number: 20190712-5147.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2396-000.
    Applicants: Louisville Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Filing of Transition
Mechanism Agreement to be effective 9/11/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/12/19.
    Accession Number: 20190712-5149.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2397-000.
    Applicants: Kentucky Utilities Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Filing of KU Concurrence
Transition Mechanism Agmt to be effective 9/11/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/12/19.
    Accession Number: 20190712-5152.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2398-000.
    Applicants: Hancock County Wind, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Hancock County Wind, LLC
Application for Market-Based Rate Authority to be effective 9/11/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/12/19.
    Accession Number: 20190712-5156.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2399-000.
    Applicants: Caden Energix Hickory LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Market-Based Rate Application
to be effective 9/14/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/15/19.
    Accession Number: 20190715-5000.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/5/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2400-000.
    Applicants: Electric Energy, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: compliance 3 2019 Attachment M to
be effective 5/22/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/15/19.
    Accession Number: 20190715-5043.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/5/19.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following public
utility holding company filings:

    Docket Numbers: PH19-14-000.
    Applicants: PGGM Vermogensbeheer B.V.
    Description: PGGM Vermogensbeheer B.V. submits FERC 65-B Material
Change in Facts of Waiver Notification, et al.
    Filed Date: 7/11/19.
    Accession Number: 20190711-5165.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/1/19.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 15, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-15375 Filed 7-18-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


                                Meeting Agenda
                          RCRA Corrosivity Coalition
                                      and
                    U.S. EPA Waste Characterization Branch
                 Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
                                 June 17, 2015
                             11:00 a.m.-12:30 p.m.

I.	INTRODUCTIONS

II.	ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION

      A.	Agency Information Needs:   What information would be helpful to the Agency in formulating its decision on the petition?  When would EPA like to receive that information?
      B.	Injury/Adverse Effects Data:  Is EPA aware of any information related to injuries or other adverse effects from waste materials with pH under 12.5, other than the allegations contained in the petition?  Any government or academic epidemiology studies?
      C. 	Quantity of Materials/Burden Assessment:  Has EPA assessed the quantity of waste materials that would be brought into the RCRA hazardous waste regulatory system if the petitioners request is granted?  Any assessment of the economic impact and management burdens such a decision would pose?
      	►	Discussion of individual stakeholder concerns and examples
      D.	State Concerns/Approaches:  Have the States expressed concern about the Corrosivity Characteristic?  Do any states take a different approach in assessing corrosivity of waste?
      E.	Test Method: 	We understand that a test method for solids was under consideration by EPA in the 1990s but never adopted.  Why?  Is the Agency aware of another potential test method appropriate for solids?
      F.	EPA Standard-Setting Authority:  How does EPA view its authority to establish a threshold for determining what materials qualify as hazardous waste?  What standard does EPA use to determine if pH 12.5 or pH 11.5 is the appropriate threshold?
      G.	History of Corrosivity Characteristic: 	What was the basis for EPA's 1996 decision as part of the Scoping Study not to amend the RCRA Corrosivity Characteristic?
      H. 	Schedule:  What is the Agency's schedule for formulating a response to the petition by March 2016?

Stakeholder Attendees
John Wittenborn, Kelley Drye & Warren, coordinator of RCRA Corrosivity Coalition, also representing Leather Industries of America
Joe Green, Kelley Drye & Warren, co-coordinator of RCRA Corrosivity Coalition, also representing Specialty Steel Industry of North America
Amy Schaffer, American Forest & Paper Association
Brendan Mascarenhas, American Chemistry Council
Tom Herman, Portland Cement Association
Colin Carroll, American Iron and Steel Institute
Tawny Bridgeford, National Mining Association
Jeff Gunnulfsen, American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers
John Arnett, Copper & Brass Fabricators Council
Dan Moss, Society of Chemical Manufacturers and Affiliates
Jamie Conrad, for Society of Chemical Manufacturers and Affiliates
Ali Alavi, Horsehead Corporation
Eric Stuart, Steel Manufacturers Association
Karen Kiggins, National Slag Association
William Herz, National Lime Association
Kerry Kelly, Waste Management Inc.


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 65 (Thursday, April 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20326-20327]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07809]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-D-0126]

Draft Compliance Policy Guide Sec. 100.250 Food Facility
Registration--Human and Animal Food; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of draft Compliance Policy Guide Sec. 100.250 Food
Facility Registration--Human and Animal Food (the draft CPG). The draft
CPG, when finalized, will provide guidance for FDA staff on issues
related to food facility registration under a section of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), including the requirement that
certain food facilities register with FDA, the requirement that
registered facilities biennially renew their registrations with FDA,
and FDA's authority to suspend a food facility's registration.

DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comments on
this draft CPG before it begins work on the final version of the CPG,
submit either electronic or written comments on the draft CPG by May 6,
2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft CPG
to the Division of Compliance Policy (HFC-230), Office of Enforcement,
Food and Drug Administration, 12420 Parklawn Dr., Rockville, MD 20857.
Send two self-

addressed adhesive labels to assist that office in processing your
request, or fax your request to<PHONE_NUMBER>. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic access to the draft CPG.
    Submit electronic comments on the draft CPG to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mischelle B. Ledet, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-
615), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College
Park, MD 20740,<PHONE_NUMBER>; or
Kim R. Young, Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV-230), Food and Drug
Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a draft CPG entitled
``Compliance Policy Guide Sec. 100.250 Food Facility Registration--
Human and Animal Food.'' The draft CPG is being issued consistent with
FDA's good guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft
CPG, when finalized, will replace ``Compliance Policy Guide Sec.
110.300 Registration of Food Facilities Under the Public Health
Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002.''
    Section 415 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 350d) requires owners,
operators, or agents in charge of domestic and foreign facilities that
manufacture, process, pack, or hold food for human or animal
consumption in the United States to register their facilities with FDA,
unless an exception applies (see 21 CFR 1.226 and 1.227). The FDA Food
Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) (Pub. L. 111-353), enacted on January
4, 2011, amended section 415 of the FD&C Act in relevant part to
require registrants for food facilities to submit additional
registration information to FDA, and to require facilities required to
register with FDA to renew such registrations biennially. FSMA also
amended section 415 of the FD&C Act to provide FDA with authority to
suspend the registration of a food facility in certain circumstances.
Specifically, if FDA determines that food manufactured, processed,
packed, received, or held by a registered facility has a reasonable
probability of causing serious adverse health consequences or death to
humans or animals, FDA may by order suspend the registration of a
facility that: (1) Created, caused, or was otherwise responsible for
such reasonable probability; or (2) knew of, or had reason to know of,
such reasonable probability; and packed, received, or held such food.
    The draft CPG is intended to provide guidance for FDA staff
regarding enforcement of the food facility registration provisions of
section 415 of the FD&C Act, including the requirement that certain
food facilities register with FDA, the requirement that registered
facilities biennially renew their registrations with FDA, and FDA's
authority to suspend a food facility's registration. The draft CPG also
contains information that may be useful for the regulated industry and
to the public.
    The draft CPG, when finalized, will represent the Agency's current
thinking on food facility registration requirements of section 415 of
the FD&C Act. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any
person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternate
approach may be used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This draft guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations and section 415 of the FD&C Act.
These collections of information are subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of information in 21 CFR 1.230
through 1.235 and section 415 of the FD&C Act have been approved under
OMB Control No. 0910-0502.

III. Comments

    Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to http://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.

IV. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the draft CPG from
FDA's Office of Regulatory Affairs history page. It may be accessed at
http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/ComplianceManuals/CompliancePolicyGuidanceManual/default.htm. Guidance documents are also
available at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: March 22, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-07809 Filed 4-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 18, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48474-48475]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22494]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[EPA-R05-OAR-2017-0256; FRL-9969-66-Region 5]

Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Redesignation of the Fulton County Area
to Attainment of the 2008 Lead Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve the State of Ohio's request to revise the designation of the
Fulton County nonattainment area to attainment of the 2008 National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for lead. EPA is also proposing
to approve the maintenance plan and related elements of the
redesignation. Finally, EPA is proposing to approve reasonably
available control measure/reasonably available control technology
measures and a comprehensive emissions inventory as meeting the Clean
Air Act (CAA) requirements. EPA is taking these actions in accordance
with the CAA and EPA's implementation regulations regarding the 2008
lead NAAQS.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 17, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2017-0256 at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Rau, Environmental Engineer,
Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no
further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives relevant adverse
comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and public comments
will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed
rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For
additional information, see the direct final rule which is located in
the Rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: September 28, 2017.
Robert A. Kaplan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2017-22494 Filed 10-17-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P