"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> 02/06/2008 04:36 PM

To

Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

David Misenheimer/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

RE: Janet - quick question that Ron suggested last week I ask you

Thanks!

-----Original Message-----

From<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 4:35 PM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Subject: RE: Janet - quick question that Ron suggested last week I ask

you

Thanks Heidi, we're doing much better.  I asked David about your

question and have pasted his response below.  Let me know if you have

any further questions.

Thanks,

Janet

The U.S. participates in international organizations that create

international concensus standards for engines and fuels for diesel

marine vessels and aircraft - International Maritime Organization (IMO)

for marine vessels and International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)

for aircraft.  Once the standards are passed by the international

organizations, commercial entities generally move to meet the standard

voluntarily, but EPA often passes a rule to codify the standard for U.S.

companies.  I think the case for the aircraft standard is the

international agreement has been passed and U.S. aircraft are meeting

the standards, but EPA has not yet proposed the rule to codify the

requirements in the U.S.  I don't know the current status of the IMO

diesel marine standard.

More information can be found at

http://www.epa.gov/OMS/oceanvessels.htm

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/aviation.htm

_______________________________________

Janet F. Cakir, Ph.D.

Environmental Protection Specialist

Air Benefits Cost Group

109 TW Alexander Dr., (C439-02)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Tel:<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>

email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

             "King, Heidi R."

             <Heidi_R._King@o

             mb.eop.gov>                                             To

                                      Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

             02/06/2008 03:43                                        cc

             PM                       Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

                                                                Subject

                                      RE: Janet - quick question that

                                      Ron suggested last week I ask you

Thanks Janet, I hope your baby is feeling better (and you too; it's no

fun to suffer vicarously for your child)

Are these rules below final, or assumed to be promulgated, or treaty

terms?

Thanks --

heidi

-----Original Message-----

From<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 3:40 PM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc<EMAIL_ADDRESS> Subject: Fw: Janet - quick question that Ron suggested last week I ask

you

Thanks Heidi,

     We're looking forward to seeing your comments on the chapters we

sent for review.  I've asked David, our mobile controls expert your

questions and his answer is highlighted below in green.  We lost a

little momentum on the baseline issue mostly because I was out with a

sick baby all week last week.  I know it's remained on the radar screen

for management and I've been working to move it forward since I got back

in the office on Monday.  You will be getting materials from us on that

shortly.

Thanks,

Janet

  _______________________________________

Janet F. Cakir, Ph.D.

Environmental Protection Specialist

Air Benefits Cost Group

109 TW Alexander Dr., (C439-02)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Tel:<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>

email<EMAIL_ADDRESS> ----- Forwarded by Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/06/2008 03:35 PM -----

             David

             Misenheimer/RTP/

             USEPA/US                                                To

                                      Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

             02/06/2008 02:55                                        cc

             PM

                                                                Subject

                                      Re: Fw: Janet - quick question

                                      that Ron suggested last week I

                                      ask you(Document link: Janet

                                      Cakir)

These are both new for the O3 NAAQS RIA.  We included the Ocean Going

Vessels Standard in the PM NAAQS RIA, but only for vessels burning

diesel fuel.  We inadvertently omitted vessels burning residual fuel

even though they would be included in this standard, so we added these

sources to the O3 NAAQS RIA.

David Misenheimer

USEPA, OAQPS/HEID/ABCG (C439-02)

Durham, NC 27711

919.541.5473

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>              Janet

             Cakir/RTP/USEPA/

             US                                                      To

                                      David

             02/06/2008 02:27         Misenheimer/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

             PM                                                      cc

                                                                Subject

                                      Fw: Janet - quick question that

                                      Ron suggested last week I ask you

David,

      Do you know the answer to Heidi's question below?  If so, let me

know and I'll forward your response when I respond to her email.

Thanks,

Janet

_______________________________________

Janet F. Cakir, Ph.D.

Environmental Protection Specialist

Air Benefits Cost Group

109 TW Alexander Dr., (C439-02)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Tel:<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>

email<EMAIL_ADDRESS> ----- Forwarded by Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/06/2008 02:25 PM -----

             "King, Heidi R."

             <Heidi_R._King@o

             mb.eop.gov>                                             To

                                      Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

             02/06/2008 12:39                                        cc

             PM                       Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

                                                                Subject

                                      Janet - quick question that Ron

                                      suggested last week I ask you

Janet,

The purpose of this email is to ask a question I raised with Ron last

week in review of the draft RIA.  P 3-8 lists assumptions in the

baseline of International Aircraft NOx standard, ocean-going vessles

residual fuel rule.  Could you tell me whether these are from the PM

baseline, or whether these are new?  I'm afraid that there is not

general familiarity at OMB with these rules.

Also - I owe you both a short list of comments on the draft final rule

RIA.  I agreed with Ron that it would not be a detailed list but rather

identify big picture items just to make sure we remain aligned in

expectations, given the short timeline.

Thanks for your voicemail; I spoke this morning with Ron and I believe

we are in agreement that OMB asks for a sense of what will be available

for baseline and extrap costs as next steps.  These are critical points

for us and I want to make sure our agreement a couple of weeks ago is

not lost amidst the other demands on our time.  Thank you for your

responsiveness!  It will be an even busier time these next few weeks, so

I'll do my best to contribute to effective communication on those issues

of heightened interest from OMB.

Thank you,

heidi

Heidi R. King

OMB/OIRA

(202) 395-4551


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 180 (Monday, September 17, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57041-57043]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22528]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0820; Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-31-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Thielert Aircraft Engines GmbH Models
TAE 125-01, TAE 125-02-99, and TAE 125-02-114 Reciprocating Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) that applies to all Thielert Aircraft Engines (TAE) GmbH Models
TAE 125-01, TAE 125-02-99, and TAE 125-02-114 Reciprocating Engines.
The existing AD currently requires installation of full-authority
digital electronic control (FADEC) software version 2.91. Since we
issued that AD, we have received reports of possible power loss on
airplanes equipped with TAE 125 engines. This proposed AD would require
removing all software mapping versions prior to 292, 301, or 302,
applicable to the TAE engine model. We are proposing this AD to prevent
engine power loss or in-flight shutdown, resulting in reduced control
of or damage to the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 16,
2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Thielert
Aircraft Engines GmbH, Platanenstrasse 14 D-09350, Lichtenstein,
Germany, phone: +49-37204-696-0; fax: +49-37204-696-55; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>You may view this service information at
the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Strom, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0820;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-31-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On March 22, 2011 we issued AD 2011-07-09, amendment 39-16646 (76
FR 17757, March 31, 2011), for Thielert Aircraft Engines GmbH models
TAE 125-01, TAE 125-02-99, and TAE 125-02-114 reciprocating engines
installed in, but not limited to, Cessna 172 and (Reims-built) F172
series (European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) STC No. EASA.A.S.01527);
Piper PA-28 series (EASA STC No. EASA.A.S. 01632); APEX (Robin) DR 400
series (EASA STC No. A.S.01380); and Diamond Aircraft Industries Models
DA 40, DA 42, and DA 42M NG airplanes. That AD requires installation of
FADEC software version 2.91. That AD resulted from service experience
that showed the FADEC channel B manifold air pressure sensor hose
permeability was not always recognized as a fault by the FADEC. We
issued that AD to prevent engine power loss or in-flight shutdown,
resulting in reduced control of or damage to the airplane.

Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued

    Since we issued AD 2011-07-09, we have received reports of possible
power loss on airplanes equipped with TAE 125 engines. The preliminary
investigation results have shown that an

undetected engine overspeed, due to a slipping clutch, may have
contributed to these occurrences, in combination with other
circumstances.

Relevant Service Information

    We reviewed TAE Service Bulletin TM TAE 000-0007, Revision 19,
dated August 31, 2012. The service information describes procedures for
updating the affected FADEC software.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would retain none of the requirements of AD 2011-
07-09. This proposed AD would require removing all software mapping
versions prior to 292, 301, or 302, applicable to the TAE engine model.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect about 112 engines
installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 0.5 work-hours per product to comply with this proposed AD.
The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of the proposed AD to U.S. operators to be $4,760.

Authority for this Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing airworthiness directive
(AD) 2011-07-09, Amendment 39-16646 (76 FR 17757, March 31, 2011), and
adding the following new AD:

Thielert Aircraft Engines GmbH: Docket No. FAA-2010-0820;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-31-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by November 16,
2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD supersedes AD 2011-07-09, Amendment 39-16646.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Thielert Aircraft Engines GmbH models TAE
125-01, TAE 125-02-99, and TAE 125-02-114 reciprocating engines
installed in, but not limited to, Cessna 172 and (Reims-built) F172
series (European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) STC No.
EASA.A.S.01527); Piper PA-28 series (EASA STC No. EASA.A.S. 01632);
APEX (Robin) DR 400 series (EASA STC No. A.S.01380); and Diamond
Aircraft Industries Models DA 40, DA 42, and DA 42M NG airplanes.

(d) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of possible power loss on
airplanes equipped with TAE 125 engines. We are issuing this AD to
prevent engine power loss or in-flight shutdown, resulting in
reduced control of or damage to the airplane.

(e) Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following. Within 55 flight hours or
within 3 months of the effective date of the AD, or during the next
scheduled maintenance, whichever occurs first, remove all full-
authority digital electronic control (FADEC) software prior to
versions 292, 301, and 302. Tables 1, 2, and 3 to paragraph (e)
provide the software mapping and respective part numbers for
software versions 292, 301, and 302, installed on the TAE 125-01,
TAE 125-02-99, and TAE-125-02-114 engines, respectively.

             Table 1 to Paragraph (e) for TAE 125-01 Engines
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Software mapping                         Part No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
T14V292CES..........................................     20-7610-55104R9
T28V292CES..........................................     20-7610-55105R7
T14V292PIP..........................................     40-7610-55106R9
T28V292PIP..........................................     40-7610-55107R7
T14V292APEX.........................................     60-7610-55106R9
T14V292DIA..........................................     50-7610-55105R9
R28V292DIA..........................................     50-7610-55107R5
------------------------------------------------------------------------

           Table 2 to Paragraph (e) for TAE 125-02-99 Engines
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Software mapping                         Part No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
O14V301CES..........................................     20-7610-E000110
O28V301CES..........................................     20-7610-E001110
O14V301PIP..........................................     40-7610-E000110
O28V301PIP..........................................     40-7610-E001110
O14V301APEX.........................................     60-7610-E000110
O14V301DA40.........................................     50-7610-E000110
O28V301DA42.........................................     52-7610-E000505
------------------------------------------------------------------------

           Table 3 to Paragraph (e) for TAE 125-02-114 Engines
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Software mapping                         Part No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
P14V302CES..........................................     20-7610-E002007
P28V302CES..........................................     20-7610-E003007
P28V302PIP..........................................     40-7610-E003007
P14V302APEX.........................................     60-7610-E002007
P14V302DA40.........................................     50-7610-E002007
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request.

(g) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Alan Strom,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803;

email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (2) Refer to MCAI Airworthiness Directive No. 2012-0116, dated
July 3, 2012, and Thielert Aircraft Engines Service Bulletin TM TAE
000-0007, Revision 19, dated August 31, 2012, for related
information.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Thielert Aircraft Engines GmbH, Platanenstrasse 14 D-09350,
Lichtenstein, Germany, phone: +49-37204-696-0; fax: +49-37204-696-
55; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>You may view this service
information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on September 5, 2012.
Colleen M. D'Alessandro,
Assistant Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-22528 Filed 9-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


  	ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

	40 CFR Part 52

	[EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0904; FRL-    ]

	Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;

	Maryland; PM-10 Test Methods

AGENCY:     Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION:     Direct final rule.

SUMMARY:  EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the
Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP).  The revisions incorporate by
reference EPA’s test methods for particulate matter with a particle
size of 10 microns or less (PM-10). EPA is approving these revisions to
the General Administrative Provisions of the Maryland regulations in
accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act.

DATES:  This rule is effective on [Insert date 60 days after publication
in the Federal Register]  without further notice, unless EPA receives
adverse written comment by [Insert date 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register].  If  EPA receives such comments, it will publish a
timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and
inform the public that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES:  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number
EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0904 by one of the following methods:

 www.regulations.gov.  Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.

     B.    E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    C.    Mail:   EPA-
R03-OAR-2006-0904, Linda Miller, Acting Chief, Air Quality Planning and
Analysis Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.

     D.   Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III
address.  Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket(s normal
hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.

Instructions:  Direct your comments to Docket ID No.
EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0904.  EPA's policy is that all comments received will
be included in the public docket without change, and may be made
available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to
be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or
e-mail.  The www.regulations.gov website is an (anonymous access(
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.  If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet.  If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit.  If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment.  Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.

Docket:  All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.  Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form.  Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.  Copies of the State submittal
are available at the Maryland Department of the Environment, 1800
Washington Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore, Maryland, 21230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Miller,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I.	Background

On June 21, 2006, the State of Maryland submitted a formal revision to
its State Implementation Plan (SIP).  The SIP revision consists of
regulatory amendment (Revision 06-06) which incorporates by reference
EPA’s PM-10 test methods.   The Maryland regulation cites test methods
used to show compliance with emission standards in COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>.
The EPA-approved test methods found in 40 CFR Appendix A were previously
incorporated by reference in COMAR <IP_ADDRESS> and approved as part of
the Maryland SIP.  The method for particulate matter found in Appendix
A, Test Method 5, which captures particulate matter in the front half of
the test train and finer particulates and condensables collected in the
second half.   Method 5 typically analyzes the front half of the test
train.   Compliance with Prevention of Significant Deterioration permits
for major sources of PM-10 requires the inclusion of condensables.   The
revised PM-10 test methods included in this SIP revision require the
analysis of condensables for PM-10 emission limits.

The EPA-approved test methods for particulate matter which are the
subject of this rulemaking are found in 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix M.  In
addition, the revision references an EPA conditionally approved test
method (CTM).  The CTMs have been evaluated by the Agency and may be
applicable to one or more categories of stationary sources. The EPA
confidence in a method included in this category is based upon review of
various technical information including, but not limited to, field and
laboratory validation studies; EPA understanding of the most significant
quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) issues; and EPA
confirmation that the method addresses these QA/QC issues sufficiently
to identify when the method may not be acquiring representative data.
The method's QA/QC procedures are required as a condition of
applicability.

Summary of SIP Revision

The State of Maryland has submitted revisions to the list of test
methods for PM-10 for approval into the Maryland SIP.   The revisions to
COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>  incorporate by reference the following test methods
for PM-10 stack testing:  Test Methods 201A and 202 (40 CFR Part 51
Appendix M); Test Method 5 (40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A) with Test method
202; Test Method 5 using front half and back half procedure; Conditional
Test Method 39 may be substituted for Test Method 202.  The revisions
also include a provision for approval of alternative test methods for
PM-10 if approved by the State and EPA.

III.	Final Action

EPA is approving revisions to COMAR <IP_ADDRESS> to incorporate by
reference EPA’s PM-10 test methods.  EPA is publishing this rule
without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse comment.  However,
in the (Proposed Rules( section of today(s Federal Register, EPA is
publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to
approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are filed.  This rule will
be effective on [Insert date 60 days from date of publication in the
Federal Register] without further notice unless EPA receives adverse
comment by [Insert date 30 days from date of publication in the Federal
Register].  If EPA receives adverse comment, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule
will not take effect.  EPA will address all public comments in a
subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule.  EPA will not
institute a second comment period on this action.  Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at this time.

IV.  Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A.   General Requirements

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action
is not a "significant regulatory action" and therefore is not subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget.  For this reason, this
action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, "Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use" (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).  This action merely approves state law
as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law.  Accordingly, the Administrator
certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).  Because this rule approves pre-existing
requirements under state law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain
any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Public Law 104-4).   This rule also does not have tribal implications
because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).  This action also
does not have Federalism implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).  This
action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal requirement,
and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act.  This rule also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks( (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), because it is not economically significant.

In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA(s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.  In this
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to
use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to
disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS.  It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act.  Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply.  This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

B.   Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the
rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to
each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United
States.   EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register.  This rule is not a
(major rule( as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

C.  Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial
review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of
Appeals for the appropriate circuit by [insert date 60 days from date of
publication of this document in the Federal Register].  Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action.  This action to approve incorporation by reference of
PM-10 stack test methods into the Maryland SIP may not be challenged
later in proceedings to enforce its requirements.  (See section
307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

_________________
_________/s/_________________

Dated:  December 18, 2006  				Donald S. Welsh,

                                      				Regional Administrator,

                                      				Region III.

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52 - [AMENDED]

1.  The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

               Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart V( Maryland

2. In ( 52.1070, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising the
entry for COMAR  <IP_ADDRESS> to read as follows:

( 52.1070  		Identification of plan.

*		*		*		*		*

(c)* * *

       EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE MARYLAND SIP

Code of Maryland administrative regulations (COMAR) citation

Title/subject

State effective date

EPA approval date

Additional explanation/

citation at 40 CFR 52.1100

26.11.01	General Administrative Provisions

          *            *               *              *              *
              *             *

<IP_ADDRESS> 	Testing and Monitoring	6/19/06

[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number where the
document begins]

Paragraph .04c(2) is added

 *             *               *                *                *
        *           *

*	*	*	*	*

 PAGE  8

 PAGE  9


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 55 (Thursday, March 21, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10430-10433]
[FR Doc No: 2019-05369]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2019-0122]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Delaware River, Philadelphia, PA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
navigable waters of the Delaware River to restrict and protect vessel
traffic during the offloading of two Post-Panamax gantry cranes at the
Port of Philadelphia. This action is intended to protect mariners and
vessels from the hazards associated with these offloading activities.
Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless a
vessel meets the stated requirements or is specifically authorized by
the Captain of the Port Delaware Bay. This rule compliments a safety
zone found in docket number USCG-2019-0109 addressing navigation risks
while the vessel carrying the cranes is underway in Delaware Bay and
River.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from March 21, 2019
through April 30, 2019. This rule may be cancelled earlier if the
project is completed before the stated end date. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used from March 15, 2019, through
March 21, 2019.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0122 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
rulemaking, call or email Petty Officer Thomas Welker, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Delaware Bay, Waterways Management Branch; telephone (215) 271-
4814, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The M/V ZHEN HUA 25 is transporting three post-Panamax gantry
cranes to ports within the United States. These large cranes extend
beyond the width of M/V ZHEN HUA 25 on both sides of the vessel and
create a navigational hazard to vessels operating within a certain
proximity. The cranes are fastened in manner to facilitate passage
through open ocean. Upon arrival with the Delaware River, M/V ZHEN HUA
25 will transit to anchorage

and begin an approximately four day process of removing the sea
fastenings. The M/V ZHEN HUA 25 will then proceed, conditions
permitting, to berth at the Port of Philadelphia Greenwich Terminal.
The vessel will deliver two of the three cranes then proceed outbound
to Wilmington, NC, with one gantry crane remaining onboard.
    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable and contrary to
the public interest. There is insufficient time to allow for a
reasonable comment period prior to the anticipated arrival of M/V ZHEN
HUA 25 to the Delaware Bay Captain of the Port zone. The rule must be
in force by March 15, 2019, to serve its purpose of ensuring the safety
of waterway users and the general public from hazards associated with
the offloading of post-Panamax gantry cranes with the Delaware Bay
Captain of the Port Zone.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest
because immediate action is needed to mitigate the potential safety
hazards associated with the offloading of the post-Panamax gantry
cranes.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034. The COTP has determined that there are potential hazards
associated with the offloading of the post-Panamax gantry cranes. These
potential hazards will be a safety concern for anyone transiting
navigable waters of the Delaware River bounded to the south by a line
drawn from the southeast corner of Pier 124S at 39[deg]53'41.751'' N,
075[deg]08'19.1419'' W, thence east-southeast to the New Jersey
Shoreline at 39[deg]53'34'' N, 075[deg]07'49'' W, and bounded to the
north by the southernmost edge of the Walt Whitman Bridge.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a temporary safety zone on the Delaware River
bounded to the south by a line drawn from the southeast corner of Pier
124S at 39[deg]53'41.751'' N, 075[deg]08'19.1419'' W, thence east-
southeast to the New Jersey Shoreline at 39[deg]53'34'' N,
075[deg]07'49'' W, and bounded to the north by the southernmost edge of
the Walt Whitman Bridge. This safety zone is needed to protect
personnel and vessels, in the navigable waters within the safety zone
as well as persons on the adjacent shoreline during offloading of two
Post-Panamax gantry cranes. This safety zone will be enforced for
approximately seven days beginning from the time of the M/V ZHEN HUA 25
moors at Greenwich Terminal until the vessel departs from the terminal,
unless cancelled earlier by the COTP Delaware Bay. Enforcement of the
safety zone will be announced via broadcast notice to mariners.
    Vessels will be able to transit through the safety zone without
permission from the COTP Delaware Bay if they meet the following
requirements: (1) Transit through the safety zone at the minimum safe
speed to reduce wake and maintain steerage, (2) except for towing
vessels designated as assist tugs and operating in such capacity, do
not overtake, meet, or otherwise pass any other unmoored or unanchored
vessel while transiting through the safety zone, and (3) regardless of
travel direction, vessels shall remain east of the centerline of the
main navigation channel. The centerline is depicted on U. S. Electronic
Navigational Chart US5PA12M and is a line drawn approximately from
39[deg]53'39'' N, 075[deg]08'11'' W, thence north-northeast to
approximate position 39[deg]54'19'' N, 075[deg]07'54'' W, and thence
north to approximate position 39[deg]54'20'' N, 075[deg]07'54'' W.
Vessels which do not meet all of the requirements listed above will be
prohibited from entering or transiting the safety zone without prior
approval of the COTP Delaware Bay. Vessels requesting to enter or
transit the safety zone may contact the Sector Delaware Bay Command
Center via VHF-FM channel 16.
    Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the short duration
and traffic management of the safety zone. This rule will allow for
vessels to transit through the safety zone while the M/V ZHEN HUA 25
moored at Greenwich Terminal in Port of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania if
certain requirements are met, and the Coast Guard anticipates that most
vessels will be able to freely transit around the safety zone and will
not need to seek permission to enter the zone. For these reasons, the
impact on waterway traffic is expected to be minimal.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule will affect your small
business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,

please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves
a safety zone to be enforced only during the offload of a vessel
carrying post-Panamax gantry cranes. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T05-0122, to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T05-0122  Safety Zone, Delaware River, Philadelphia, PA.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters bounded to the south by a line drawn from the southeast corner
of Pier 124S at 39[deg]53'42'' N, 075[deg]08'20'' W, thence east-
southeast to the New Jersey shoreline at 39[deg]53'34'' N,
075[deg]07'47'' W, and bounded to the north by the southernmost edge of
the Walt Whitman Bridge. These coordinates are based on the 1984 World
Geodetic System (WGS 84).
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Delaware Bay (COTP) in the enforcement of the
safety zone.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general safety zone
regulations in subpart C of this part and except for as described in
paragraph (c)(3) of this section, vessels may not enter, remain in, or
transit the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section
unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter or remain in the zone, unless
moored or anchored outside the main navigational channel, contact the
COTP or the COTP's representative via VHF-FM Channel 16. Those in the
safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
    (3) Vessels may transit the safety zone described in paragraph (a)
of this section if all of the following criteria are met:
    (i) Vessel shall maintain the minimum safe speed to reduce wake and
maintain steerage.
    (ii) Except towing vessels designated as assist tugs and operating
in such capacity, no vessel may meet, overtake or otherwise pass
another unmoored or unanchored vessel within the safety zone.
    (iii) Regardless of travel direction, vessels shall remain east of
the centerline of the main navigation channel. The centerline is
depicted on U.S. Electronic Navigational Chart US5PA12M and is a line
drawn approximately from 39[deg]53'39'' N, 075[deg]08'11'' W, thence
north-northeast to approximate position 39[deg]54'19'' N,
075[deg]07'54'' W, and thence north to approximate position
39[deg]54'20'' N, 075[deg]07'54'' W.
    (d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local
agencies.
    (e) Enforcement period. Enforcement of the safety zone will begin
when the M/V ZHEN HUA 25 arrives at berth at the Greenwich Terminal in
the Port of

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and end at midnight on April 30, 2019.

    Dated: March 15, 2019.
Scott E. Anderson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Delaware Bay.
[FR Doc. 2019-05369 Filed 3-20-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: May 31, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 104)]
[Notices]
[Page 30919-30921]
[DOCID:fr31my06-91]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0368; FRL-8068-9]

Notice of Filing of a Pesticide Petition for Establishment of an
Exemption from the Requirement of Tolerances for Residues of Poly(2-
Ethylhexyl Acrylate/2-Hydroxyethyl Acrylate/N-(Hydroxymethyl)-2-
Methylacrylamide/Methacrylic Acid/Methyl Methacrylate/Styrene, Ammonium
Salt in or on Various Food Commodities

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the initial filing of a pesticide
petition proposing the establishment of an exemption from the
requirement of tolerances for residues of poly(2-ethylhexyl acrylate/2-
hydroxyethyl acrylate/N-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methylacrylamide/methacrylic
acid/methyl methacrylate/styrene, ammonium salt in or on various
commodities when used as an inert in pesticide products.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 30, 2006.

ADDRESSES:  Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0368, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal:  http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.

     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
pm., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2006-0368. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The Federal regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index.
Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov
, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP

Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. The hours of operation
of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket telephone number is (703)
305-5805.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bipin Gandhi, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

     1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
     2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    EPA is printing a summary of a pesticide petition received under
section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21
U.S.C.346a, proposing the establishment or amendment of regulations in
40 CFR part 180 for residues of pesticide chemicals in or on various
food commodities. EPA has determined that this pesticide petition
contains data or information regarding the elements set forth in FFDCA
section 408(d)(2); however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency
of the submitted data at this time or whether the data support granting
of the pesticide petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA
rules on this pesticide petition.
    Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a summary of the petition included in
this notice, prepared by the petitioner is available on EPA's
Electronic Docket at http://www.regulations.gov. To locate this

information on the home page of EPA's Electronic Docket, select ``Quick
Search'' and type the OPP docket ID number. Once the search has located
the docket, clicking on the ``Docket ID'' will bring up a list of all
documents in the

docket for the pesticide including the petition summary.

New Exemption from Tolerance

    PP 6E7063. IE. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Inc., 1007 Market
St., Wilmington, DE 19898, proposes to establish an exemption from the
requirement of tolerances for residues of the inert poly(2-ethylhexyl
acrylate/2-hydroxyethyl acrylate/N-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methylacrylamide/
methacrylic acid/methyl methacrylate/styrene, ammonium salt in or on
food commodities. Because this petition is a request for an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance without numerical limitations, no
analytical method is required.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives,
Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    Dated: May 16, 2006.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E6-8145 Filed 5-30-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


January 29, 2010

MEMORANDUM

TO: 			Air Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0161

SUBJECT:	2005 Petroleum Baseline Lifecycle GHG Calculations

This memorandum accompanies a spreadsheet on the docket that includes
petroleum baseline lifecycle GHG emissions calculations.  This
spreadsheet contains five tabs.  The first and second tabs document the
well-to-tank, tailpipe, and well-to-wheels values for the gasoline
baseline and the diesel baseline used for the final rule.  The third and
fourth tabs contain the tailpipe values for ethanol and biodiesel used
for the final rule.  The fifth tab contains our estimate of land-use
change emissions from the conversion of Alberta forest for oil sands
production.