[Federal Register: April 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 77)]
[Notices]
[Page 21061-21063]
[DOCID:fr22ap10-122]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-61903; File No. SR-CHX-2010-07]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Certain Incorrect or
Inaccurate Cross-References

April 14, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that on April 7, 2010, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the CHX. CHX has filed
this proposal pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \3\ which is
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    CHX proposes to amend to correct a number of incorrect or obsolete
cross-references. The text of this proposed rule change is available on
the Exchange's Web site at http://www.chx.com, on the Commission's Web
site at http://www.sec.gov, and at the Commission's Public Reference
Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the CHX included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule changes and
discussed any comments it received regarding the proposal. The text of
these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV
below. The CHX has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C
below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Changes

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its rules to alter or delete
references to incorrect rule citations or concepts which are no longer
applicable to the manner in which the Exchange now transacts business.
For the most part, these changes arise out of the transformation of the
Exchange in 2006 and 2007 from a traditional floor-based auction
marketplace to an electronic exchange.\4\ In connection with this
change, the Exchange made substantial revisions to its rules in which
all of its rules were renumbered and many of them were altered or
eliminated. This filing would correct cross-references to rule
citations which were altered or eliminated during that process. As
noted above, the Exchange also fundamentally altered its trading
facilities from a floor-based exchange to a fully automated limit-order
matching system. This filing would alter or eliminate references within
CHX rules to obsolete roles or functions, such as the ``floor,''
``floor brokers,'' and ``specialists.'' This filing would also correct
certain other errors or omissions of a grammatical nature.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See SR-CHX-2006-05 (Sept. 26, 2006) (approving rule changes
in connection with adoption of Exchange's New Trading Model).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In Article 1, Rule 1 (Definitions), the Exchange proposes to delete
obsolete references to the CHX Floor, floor brokers, co-specialists and
market makers and replace them with references to Exchange-registered
Market Maker Traders (``MMTs'') and Institutional Broker
Representatives (``IBRs''). As defined in Articles 16 and 17,
respectively, MMTs and IBRs are designations for individuals with
specific rights and obligations when acting through the Exchange's
facilities. IBRs replaced the now-defunct floor broker role and MMTs
replaced the old market maker role, which had been defined under the
now-repealed Article XXXIV.
    In Article 2, Rule 5 (Committee on Exchange Procedure), the CHX
proposes to replace an obsolete cross-reference to former Article VIII,
Rule 23 with its replacement, Article 14, Rule 1. This cross-reference
is to Exchange's provisions for the arbitration of controversies
arising out of Exchange business which were renumbered, but not changed
in substance. We also propose to delete a cross-reference to
determinations by a subcommittee of the Committee on Exchange Procedure
in certain disciplinary actions under former Article XII, Rule 3, since
that grant of authority to the Committee on Exchange Procedure no
longer exists under our rules.\5\ In Article 3, Rule 1
(Qualifications), we are adding a missing subparagraph number under
section (c) and removing the reference to Article XVI, which was
repealed as unnecessary in 2006 as part of the New Trading Model rule
changes. Former Article XVI required Participants which engaged in the
sale of insurance products as an ancillary activity to file certain
reports with the Exchange and

maintain certain records relating to that activity. We note that other
self-regulatory organizations do not have specific rules relating to
the sale of insurance products by their members.\6\ In Rule 8
(Limitation on Interests in Other Organizations) of Article 3, we are
replacing cross-reference to former Article II (Participants) with that
of current Article 3 (Participants and Participant Firms), its
successor. In Article 3, Rule 11 (Transfer of Equity Securities of a
Participant Firm), we are removing Interpretation and Policy .04, which
refers to the now-deleted provisions of former Article VIII, Rule 20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Former Article XII, Rule 3 authorized the Committee on
Exchange Procedure (or appropriately designated subcommittee
thereof) to issue summary fines of up to $2,500 against Participants
for violations of Exchange's former decorum rules, such as fighting
or profanity on Exchange premises, smoking on the Trading Floor and
dress code violations. The power of the Committee on Exchange
Procedure to issue fines was eliminated in 2006 as part of our
transition to the new trading model and elimination of the Trading
Floor (See SR-CHX-2006-05). Certain decorum-type rules have been
retained in Article 8, Rule 16; however, charges based on violations
of those provisions are authorized by the Exchange's Chief
Regulatory Officer as part of the standard disciplinary process.
    \6\ See, e.g., Rules of NYSE Archipelago, Inc., National Stock
Exchange, Inc., BATS Exchange, Inc. We continue to believe that a
prospective Participant should not be disqualified merely by the
fact that it engages in insurance-related activities (such as the
sale of variable annuities) to a limited extent and all other
requirements are satisfied.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In Article 6, Rule 2 (Registration and Approval of Participant
Personnel), we are replacing the reference to the definition of
Principal Stockholders in former Article III, Rule 4, with the current
reference in Article 1, Rule 1(s). We are adding a missing reference in
Interpretation and Policy .01 of Article 6, Rule 3 (Training and
Examination of Registrants) to subsection (d) and updating a cross-
reference to the former Article XI (Financial Responsibility and
Reporting Requirements) to the current rule provisions dealing with
that topic, which is Article 7. In Article 6, Rule 11 (Continuing
Education for Registered Persons), we are deleting the rule text which
was effective prior to September 30, 2005 as no longer being relevant
and leaving only the language which is currently in force. In
Interpretation and Policy .01 to this rule, we are removing the
reference to persons transacting business on the Floor of the Exchange,
given that we no longer maintain a physical floor as part of our
trading facilities.
    In Article 7, Rule 3A (Joint Back Office Participants) we are
substituting a cross-references [sic] to Article 7 in place of former
Article XI and to current Article 10 (Margins) in place of former
Article X (Margins). We propose to update cross references to old
Article XI to current Article 7 in Article 7, Rule 4 (Financial and
Operational Reports), in a table in Article 7, Rule 6 (Fidelity Bonds)
and in Article 10, Rule 3(c)(6) (Initial Margin Rule).
    In Article 12 (Disciplinary Matters and Trial Proceedings), we
propose to update the cross references to former Article XII
(Discipline and Trial Proceedings) to current Article 12, which deals
with the same subject matter, in Rules 2 (Summary Procedure) and 8
(Minor Rule Violations). In Article 12, Rule 2(a), an incorrect cross-
reference to Article 12, Rule 5 concerning a respondent's Answer to
disciplinary charges will be replaced by the correct cross-reference to
Article 12, Rule 4(b). We are also adding a missing reference to Rule
9, which will be reserved for future use.
    In Article 17, Rule 3 (Responsibilities of Institutional Brokers),
Interpretations and Policies .03, we are removing an obsolete reference
to former Rule 11 of Article 20. Rule 11, which addressed cancellation
or modification of transactions due to systems malfunctions or
disruptions, was deleted in October 2009 as part of an industry-wide
initiative to standardize the rules relating to clearly erroneous
transactions.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ SR-CHX-2009-11 (October 2, 2009). Much of the content of
former Rule 11 is now addressed in current Rule 10 under Article 20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In Article 20, Rule 8 (Operation of the Matching System), we are
correcting certain erroneous cross references to existing order types
defined in Rule 4 (Eligible Orders). Rule 8.e.1. describes the manner
in which Cross and Cross with Size orders shall be executed and
contains an erroneous cross-reference to the description of each of
those order types in Rule 4(b)(3) and (b)(5), respectively. The
proposal corrects those cross-references to Rule 4(b)(4) and (b)(6). We
also propose to delete Interpretation and Policy .03 to Rule 8, which
contained a reference to former Rule 10a-1(e)(5) under the Act.\8\
Current Interpretation and Policy .04 will be renumbered as .03.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Former Exchange Act Rule 10a-1(e)(5), sometimes known as the
``equalizing exemption,'' provided an exception to the former
``uptick restrictions'' of Exchange Act Rule 10a-1 for registered
specialists or market makers which executed transactions at prices
at or above the last reported sale. This exemption no longer exists
under current Regulation SHO, which governs short selling in
securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In Article 22, Rule 1 (General Provisions Regarding Listing), we
propose to change outdated references to Article XXVIII (the former
Article dealing with Listings) to the current Article 22, which is
simply the renumbered version of the former Article. We also propose to
correct numbering errors in subsection (g) to Rule 1 and update the
cross reference in that subsection from old Article XXII, Rule 37 to
current Article 21, Rule 2.\9\ In Article 22, Rule 19 (Corporate
Governance), we again propose to change an outdated cross reference to
Article XXVIII to the current Article 22. The cross reference in
Interpretation and Policy .06 of Rule 19 would be updated from old
Article XXXIII, Rule 3, dealing with certain proxy requirements, to
current Article 8, Rule 14(c), which addresses the same subject matter.
In Article 22, Rule 23 (Public Disclosure Requirements for Tier I and
Tier II Issues), Interpretation and Policy .01, we propose to delete
the section headed ``Relationship Between Company Officials and
Exchange Specialists,'' since the Exchange no longer has specialists.
These provisions note certain limitations on the sharing of non-public
information between company officials and the specialist making a
market in the company's securities. Since specialists no longer exist
under our current market structure, this section appears to be
superfluous. In Article 22, Rule 24 (Investment Company Units) and Rule
25 (Portfolio Depository Receipts), we propose to update references to
the Nasdaq Small Cap Market to its current name, Nasdaq Capital Market.
Finally, in Article 22, Rule 25 (Portfolio Depository Receipts), we are
adding subsection (d) and reserving it for further use.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Those provisions address the requirement that Participants
utilize the facilities of a national securities depository for the
book entry settlement of all transactions in depository eligible
securities settled in the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act in general,\10\ and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) in particular,\11\ in that it is designed
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transaction in securities, to remove impediments and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. The elimination of obsolete cross
references and correction of other errors in our rules will serve to
eliminate a potential source of confusion for Exchange Participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments Regarding the
Proposed Rule Changes Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Changes and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \12\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \13\ thereunder in
that it effects a change that: (i) Does not significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) does not impose
any significant burden on competition; and (iii) by its terms, does not
become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such
shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is
consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the
following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-CHX-2010-07 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-CHX-2010-07. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-CHX-2010-07 and should be
submitted on or before May 13, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-9270 Filed 4-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 92 (Tuesday, May 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27338-27339]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11008]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2014-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1413]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, the FIRM and FIS
report, once effective, will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before August 11, 2014.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location and the respective Community Map Repository address listed in
the tables below. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-1413, to
Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
(email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and also are used to calculate the appropriate
flood insurance premium rates for new buildings built after the FIRM
and FIS report become effective.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation

process for at least 60 days without a mutually acceptable resolution
of an appeal. Additional information regarding the SRP process can be
found online at http://floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_fact_sheet.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location and
the respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community Map Repository
               Community                             Address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Cochise County, Arizona, and Incorporated Areas
Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Benson.........................  Planning & Zoning, 120 West 6th
                                          Street, Benson, AZ 85602.
Unincorporated Areas of Cochise County.  Cochise County Flood Control
                                          District, 1415 Melody Lane,
                                          Building F, Bisbee, AZ 85603.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Marin County, California, and Incorporated Areas
Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Belvedere......................  Building Department, 450 San
                                          Rafael Avenue, Belvedere, CA
                                          94920.
City of Larkspur.......................  Planning Department, 400
                                          Magnolia Avenue, Larkspur, CA
                                          94939.
City of Mill Valley....................  Public Works Department, 26
                                          Corte Madera Avenue, Mill
                                          Valley, CA 94941.
City of Novato.........................  Public Works Department, 922
                                          Machin Avenue, Novato, CA
                                          94945.
City of San Rafael.....................  Public Works Department, 111
                                          Morphew Street, San Rafael, CA
                                          94901.
City of Sausalito......................  Planning Department, 420 Litho
                                          Street, Sausalito, CA 94965.
Town of Corte Madera...................  Engineering Department, 233
                                          Tamalpais Drive, Corte Madera,
                                          CA 94976.
Town of Ross...........................  Public Works Department, 31 Sir
                                          Francis Drake Boulevard, Ross,
                                          CA 94957.
Town of San Anselmo....................  Public Works Department, 525
                                          San Anselmo Avenue, San
                                          Anselmo, CA 94960.
Town of Tiburon........................  Planning Department, 1505
                                          Tiburon Boulevard, Tiburon, CA
                                          94920.
Unincorporated Areas of Marin County...  Department of Public Works,
                                          3501 Civic Center Drive, Room
                                          304, San Rafael, CA 94903.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Plumas County, California, and Incorporated Areas
Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unincorporated Areas of Plumas County..  Plumas County Courthouse, 520
                                          Main Street, Quincy, CA 95971.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
          San Mateo County, California, and Incorporated Areas
Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Belmont........................  City Hall, One Twin Pines Lane,
                                          Belmont, CA 94002.
City of Foster City....................  City Hall, 610 Foster City
                                          Boulevard, Foster City, CA
                                          94404.
City of Redwood City...................  City Hall, 1017 Middlefield
                                          Road, Redwood City, CA 94063.
City of San Mateo......................  City Hall, 330 West 20th
                                          Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: April 22, 2104.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014-11008 Filed 5-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21139-21142]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08369]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2014-0145; FRL-9909-53-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Louisiana; Clean Data Determination for the Baton Rouge Area for the
2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has determined that
the Baton Rouge, Louisiana marginal 2008 8-hour ozone nonattainment
area is currently attaining the 2008 8-hour National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone. This determination is based upon
complete, quality assured, certified ambient air monitoring data that
show the area has monitored attainment of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS
during the 2011-2013 monitoring period, and continues to

monitor attainment of the NAAQS based on preliminary 2014 data.

DATES: This rule is effective on June 16, 2014 without further notice,
unless EPA receives relevant adverse comment by May 15, 2014. If EPA
receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take
effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2014-0145, by one of the following methods:
     www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions.
     Email: Mr. Guy Donaldson at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please
also send a copy by email to the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section below.
     Mail or delivery: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning
Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2014-0145. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
through http://www.regulations.gov or email, if you believe that it is
CBI or otherwise protected from disclosure. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means that EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment along with any disk or CD-ROM
submitted. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters and any form of encryption and should be free of any
defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region 6,
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available at either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment with
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT paragraph
below or Mr. Bill Deese at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Ellen Belk, Air Planning Section
(6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax
(214) 665-6762, email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. EPA's Evaluation
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    On May 21, 2012 (77 FR 30088), effective July 20, 2012, EPA
designated as nonattainment any area that was violating the 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS based on the three most recent years (2008-2010) of air
quality data. The Baton Rouge area (specifically, Ascension, East Baton
Rouge, Iberville, Livingston, and West Baton Rouge Parishes) was
designated as a marginal ozone nonattainment area. Recent air quality
data indicate that the Baton Rouge area is now attaining the 2008 8-
hour ozone standard.
    EPA is taking direct final action in determining that the Baton
Rouge, Louisiana marginal 2008 8-hour ozone nonattainment area
(hereafter the Baton Rouge area) has attained the 2008 8-hour NAAQS for
ozone. This determination is based upon complete, quality assured and
certified ambient air monitoring data that show the area has monitored
attainment of the ozone NAAQS during the 2011-2013 monitoring period.
Data entered into EPA's Air Quality System database (AQS) for 2014, but
not yet certified also show that the area continues to attain the
standard.
    This clean data determination for the Baton Rouge area is being
taken at the request of the State of Louisiana \1\ and in accordance
with our Clean Data Policy.\2\ This Clean Data Determination serves as
notice to the public that the nonattainment area's air quality meets
the 2008 ozone NAAQS.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Louisiana's letter from Secretary Peggy Hatch to Mr. Ron
Curry, dated January 23, 2014 in the docket for this action.
    \2\ Our Clean Data Policy is set forth in a May 10, 1995, EPA
memorandum from John S. Seitz, Director, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, entitled ``Reasonable Further Progress,
Attainment Demonstration, and Related Requirements for Ozone
Nonattainment Areas Meeting the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standard.'' This policy is included in the docket for this action.
    \3\ See Memorandum from Janet McCabe, Deputy Assistant
Administrator, Office of Air & Radiation, to Regional
Administrators, Region I-X, dated April 6, 2011, entitled,
``Regional consistency for the Administrative Requirements of State
Implementation Plan Submittals and the use of ``Letter Notices'',
``Attachment C--Determinations of Attainment by an Area's attainment
Date v. Clean Data Determinations & Redesignation Requests and
Maintenance Plans'' (p. 9) in the docket for this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To clarify, this action does not constitute a redesignation to
attainment under CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(i). This is because we do not
yet have an approved maintenance plan for the area as required under
section 175A of the CAA, nor have we found that the area has met the
other applicable requirements for redesignation. The classification and
designation status of the area will remain marginal nonattainment for
the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, and will be subject to marginal
nonattainment applicable requirements including a nonattainment NSR SIP
and an EI, until such time as EPA determines that the area meets all
the CAA applicable requirements for redesignation to attainment. This
finding means the area will have met one important requirement for
redesignation, that is, having air quality that meets the standard. EPA
expects that Louisiana will be providing the remaining elements
necessary for redesignation in a SIP revision. Also, this action does
not constitute a Determination of Attainment by an Area's Attainment
Date under CAA section 179(c), 181(b)(2) and 188(b)(2).

II. EPA's Evaluation

    For ozone, an area may be considered to be attaining the 2008 8-
hour ozone NAAQS if there are no violations, as determined in
accordance with 40 CFR 50, based on three complete, consecutive
calendar years of quality-assured air quality monitoring data. Under
EPA regulations at 40 CFR Part 50, the 2008 8-hour ozone standard is

attained when the 3-year average of the annual fourth-highest daily
maximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations at an ozone monitor is less
than or equal to 0.075 parts per million (ppm) (i.e., 0.075 ppm, based
on the truncating conventions in 40 CFR part 50, Appendix P). This 3-
year average is referred to as the design value. When the design value
is less than or equal to 0.075 ppm at each monitor within the area,
then the area is meeting the NAAQS. Also, the data completeness
requirement is met when the average percent of days with valid ambient
monitoring data is greater than or equal to 90%, and no single year has
less than 75% data completeness as determined in Appendix P of 40 CFR
Part 50. The data must be collected and quality-assured in accordance
with 40 CFR part 58, and recorded in the EPA Air Quality System (AQS).
The monitors generally should have remained at the same location for
the duration of the monitoring period required for demonstrating
attainment. For ease of communication, many reports of ozone
concentrations are given in parts per billion (ppb); ppb = ppm x 1,000.
Thus, 0.075 ppm equals 75 ppb.
    EPA reviewed the Baton Rouge area ozone monitoring data from
ambient ozone monitoring stations for the ozone seasons 2011 through
2013, as well as data for the 2014 ozone in AQS but not yet certified.
The 2011-2013 ozone season data for all the ozone monitors in the Baton
Rouge area have been quality assured and certified by EPA. The design
value for 2011-2013 is 0.075 ppm, and is not changed by the preliminary
data for 2014 (at this time of this writing, March 7, 2014, preliminary
data available in AQS included data for the month of January, 2014).
The data for the three ozone seasons 2011-2013, and preliminary data
for 2014, show that the Baton Rouge area is attaining the 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS.
    Table 1 shows the fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone
concentrations for the Baton Rouge, Louisiana nonattainment area
monitors for the years 2011-2013. (To find the overall design value for
the area for a given year, simply find the highest design value from
any of the eight monitors for that year.) The location of each
monitoring site in the Baton Rouge area is shown on the map entitled,
``Baton Rouge ozone and ozone precursor monitoring network'' included
in the docket associated with this action.

      Table 1--Baton Rouge Area Fourth High 8-hour Ozone Average Concentrations and Design Values (ppm) 1 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               4th Highest daily max               Design values
                                                 ------------------------------------------------   three year
                      Site                                                                           averages
                                                       2011            2012            2013      ---------------
                                                                                2011-2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plaquemine (22-047-0009)........................           0.079           0.074           0.061           0.071
Carville (22-047-0012)..........................           0.084           0.073           0.068           0.075
Dutchtown (22-005-0004).........................           0.080           0.071           0.062           0.071
LSU (22-033-0003)...............................           0.083           0.075           0.067           0.075
Port Allen (22-121-0001)........................           0.074           0.070           0.060           0.068
Pride (22-033-0013).............................           0.075           0.070           0.062           0.069
French Settlement (22-063-0002).................           0.077           0.071           0.069           0.072
Capitol (22-033-0009)...........................           0.080           0.072           0.066           0.072
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Unlike for the 1-hour ozone standard, design value calculations for the 2008 8-hour ozone standard are based
  on a rolling three-year average of the annual 4th highest values. This is the same as design value
  calculations for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. (40 CFR Part 50, Appendix I).
\2\ The Baker and Grosse Tete ozone monitoring sites were shut down after 2010; no data from these sites was
  used in the design values included in this table.

    The 8-hour ozone design value for the Baton Rouge area based on
monitoring data for 2011 through 2013 is provided in Table 2:

        Table 2--Baton Rouge Area 8-hour Ozone Design Value (ppm)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Design value
                                                           three year
               Baton Rouge area overall                      average
                                                       -----------------
                                                            2011-2013
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  0.075
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As shown in Table 2, the 8-hour ozone design value for 2011-2013,
which is based on a three-year average of the fourth-highest daily
maximum average ozone concentration at the monitor recording the
highest concentrations, is 0.075 ppm, which meets the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. Data through 2013 have been quality assured, as recorded in AQS.
Data for 2014 not yet certified also indicate that the area continues
to attain the 2008 8-hour NAAQS. In summary, monitoring data for Baton
Rouge for the three years 2011 through 2013, as well as preliminary
monitoring data for 2014, show continued attainment of the 2008 8-hour
ozone standard. Preliminary data for Baton Rouge for 2014 are included
in the docket.
    EPA's review of these data confirms that the Baton Rouge ozone
nonattainment area has met and continues to meet the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. Data for 2011-2013, show the area continues to attain the 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS. Preliminary data available to date for the 2014
ozone season are consistent with continued attainment.

III. Final Action

    We are taking direct final action to find that the Baton Rouge,
Louisiana marginal 2008 8-hour ozone nonattainment area has attained
the 2008 8-hour NAAQS for ozone. This action is based on complete,
quality assured data for 2011-2013 indicating attainment as well as on
preliminary data for the 2014 ozone season available to date which are
consistent with continued attainment. As provided in 40 CFR Section
51.918, this action provides formal acknowledgement that the Baton
Rouge area air quality data for 2011-2013, including preliminary data
for 2014, meet the applicable requirements of EPA's Clean Data Policy
for the 2008 8-hour ozone standard.
    EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because we view
this as a non-controversial amendment and anticipate no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision if relevant adverse
comments are received. This rule will

be effective on June 16, 2014 without further notice unless we receive
relevant adverse comments by May 15, 2014. If we receive relevant
adverse comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. We
will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on
the proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so now.
Please note that if we receive a relevant adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those
provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action makes a determination based on air quality data. For
that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because it merely makes a determination based on air quality data.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 16, 2014. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Ozone,
Incorporation by reference.

    Dated: April 1, 2014.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart T--Louisiana

0
2. Amend Sec.  52.977 to add a new paragraph (e) to read as follows:

Sec.  52.977  Control strategy and regulations: Ozone.

* * * * *
    (e) Clean Data Determination. Effective June 16, 2014 EPA has
determined that the Baton Rouge, Louisiana, marginal 2008 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area is currently attaining the 2008 8-hour NAAQS for
ozone.

[FR Doc. 2014-08369 Filed 4-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 33876]
[FR Doc No: 2023-11217]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-10956-01-R9]

Notice of Availability of Proposed National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Low Threat Discharges in
Navajo Nation

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 9 is
proposing to reissue a general National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit for water discharges from facilities classified
as low threat located in the Navajo Nation (Permit No. NNG990001). The
permit will be reissued upon completion of the notice and comment
period and after due consideration has been given to all comments
received. The permit, upon issuance, will be valid for five years. Use
of a general NPDES permit in the location described above allows EPA
and dischargers to allocate resources in a more efficient manner,
obtain timely permit coverage, and avoid issuing resource intensive
individual permits to each facility, while simultaneously providing
greater certainty and efficiency to the regulated community and
ensuring consistent permit conditions for comparable facilities. This
notice announces the availability of the proposed general NPDES permit
and the corresponding fact sheet for public comment which can be found
at EPA Region 9's website at: https://www.epa.gov/npdes-permits/npdes-permits-epas-pacific-southwest-region-9.

DATES: Comments on the proposed NPDES general permit must be received
by June 26, 2023.

ADDRESSES: The proposed NPDES general permit, related documents, and
instructions for submitting comments are available for public
inspection online at: https://www.epa.gov/npdes-permits/proposed-reissuance-npdes-general-permit-low-threat-discharge-navajo-nation-nng990001. If there are issues accessing the website, please contact
EPA via the contact information below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Sheth, EPA Region 9, Water
Division, NPDES Permits Office; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address: [email protected]. The proposed NPDES general permit, fact
sheet, and other related documents in the administrative record are on
file and may be inspected in person any time between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays, at the following
address: U.S. EPA Region 9, NPDES Permits Section, Water Division, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Does this action apply to me?

    The proposed NPDES General Permit for Low Threat Discharges in
Navajo Nation is intended to provide coverage for discharges of certain
types of wastewater that contain only low levels of pollutants and are
below a specified volume or for a limited time, to surface waters
within the tribal lands of Navajo Nation (which includes areas within
Arizona, New Mexico and Utah).

B. How can I submit comments?

     Submit comments by the deadline identified in this Federal
Register notice.
     No public hearing is planned. If you would like to request
a hearing, please see instructions at: https://www.epa.gov/npdes-permits/npdes-permits-epas-pacific-southwest-region-9.
     Provide your comments in writing via instructions found
here: https://www.epa.gov/npdes-permits/npdes-permits-epas-pacific-southwest-region-9. If you need assistance in a language other than
English or if you are a person with disabilities who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please reach out by email or telephone
to the EPA contact listed above. EPA encourages electronic submittals
of comments, but if you are unable to submit electronically or need
other assistance, please reach out to the contact information above.
     Please note ``General Permit for Low Threat Discharges in
Navajo Nation'' in the subject line of any email submittal and include
documentation to support your comments.
    Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.

    Dated: May 19, 2023.
Tomas Torres,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 9.
[FR Doc. 2023-11217 Filed 5-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34164-34166]
[FR Doc No: 2023-11321]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2023-D-0625]

Diabetes Mellitus: Efficacy Endpoints for Clinical Trials
Investigating Antidiabetic Drugs and Biological Products; Draft
Guidance for Industry; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ``Diabetes
Mellitus: Efficacy Endpoints for Clinical Trials Investigating
Antidiabetic Drugs and Biological Products.'' This draft guidance is
intended to help sponsors develop antidiabetic drugs for adults and
children with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. In this draft
guidance, antidiabetic drug refers to drugs intended to improve
glycemic control, including drugs intended to reduce diabetes-related
hyperglycemia (i.e., antihyperglycemic drugs) and drugs intended to
mitigate iatrogenic hypoglycemia associated with diabetes management.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by August 24, 2023 to ensure that the Agency considers your
comment on this draft guidance before it begins work on the final
version of the guidance.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on any guidance at any time as
follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2023-D-0625 for ``Diabetes Mellitus: Efficacy Endpoints for
Clinical Trials Investigating Antidiabetic Drugs and Biological
Products.'' Received comments will be placed in the docket and, except
for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable
at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
    Submit written requests for single copies of the draft guidance to
the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave.,
Hillandale Building, 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one
self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debra Reid, Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
Bldg. 22, Rm. 4221, Silver Spring, MD 20993,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry
entitled ``Diabetes Mellitus: Efficacy Endpoints for Clinical Trials
Investigating Antidiabetic Drugs and Biological Products.'' In this
draft guidance we discuss approaches to demonstrating efficacy of
antidiabetic drugs for adults and children with type 1 and type 2
diabetes mellitus. This draft guidance provides recommendations for
demonstrating efficacy for drugs that are intended to reduce diabetes-
related hyperglycemia (i.e., antihyperglycemic drugs) and to mitigate
iatrogenic hypoglycemia associated with diabetes management. The use of
hemoglobin A1c as a primary endpoint for glycemic-control trials is
discussed along with recommendations for trial design and conduct to
allow for adequate data interpretation. The draft guidance also
provides hypoglycemia definitions, trial design considerations for
hypoglycemia efficacy endpoints, and hypoglycemia measurement methods.
Additional efficacy endpoints are also briefly considered.
    This draft guidance replaces, in part, the draft guidance for
industry ``Diabetes Mellitus: Developing Drugs and Therapeutic
Biologics for Treatment and Prevention'' (73 FR 11420) published in
February 2008 and withdrawn in 2020. In March 2020, FDA withdrew the
February 2008 draft guidance because its recommendations for safety
assessment were outdated. At the same time, FDA issued the draft
guidance for industry ``Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Evaluating the Safety
of New Drugs for Improving Glycemic Control'' March 10, 2020 (85 FR
13903) (available at https://www.fda.gov/media/135936/download). This
draft guidance, when finalized, will provide FDA's current
recommendations on this issue.
    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the current thinking of FDA on ``Diabetes
Mellitus: Efficacy Endpoints for Clinical Trials Investigating
Antidiabetic Drugs and Biological Products.'' It does not establish any
rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can
use an alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    While this draft guidance contains no collection of information, it
does refer to previously approved FDA collections of information.
Therefore, clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521) is not
required for this draft guidance. The previously approved

collections of information are subject to review by OMB under the PRA.
The collections of information in 21 CFR part 312 have been approved
under OMB control number 0910-0014.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the internet may obtain the draft guidance
at https://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information/guidances-drugs, https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents, or https://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: May 23, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-11321 Filed 5-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: June 12, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 112)]
[Notices]
[Page 33734]
[DOCID:fr12jn06-58]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP02-361-060]

Gulfstream Natural Gas System, L.L.C.; Notice of Negotiated Rates

June 6, 2006.
    Take notice that on May 31, 2006, Gulfstream Natural Gas System,
L.L.C. (Gulfstream) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff,
Original Volume No. 1, Original Sheet No. 8.02a, reflecting an
effective date of June 1, 2006.
    Gulfstream states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all
affected customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-9102 Filed 6-9-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US

05/02/2008 01:27 PM

To

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Lydia Wegman, Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

ch 3

one more e-mail to follow


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 214 (Monday, November 7, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66975-66976]
[FR Doc No: 2022-23993]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1351; Airspace Docket No. 22-ASW-22]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Revocation of Class E Airspace; Marfa, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to remove the Class E airspace at Marfa,
TX. The FAA is proposing this action due to the closure of the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 22, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone
(202) 366-9826, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2022-1351/Airspace Docket No. 22-ASW-22, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at
www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in
the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would remove the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at Alta Vista Ranch Airport, Marfa, TX, due to the
closure of the airport.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory

decisions on the proposal. Comments are specifically invited on the
overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and energy-
related aspects of the proposal. Communications should identify both
docket numbers and be submitted in triplicate to the address listed
above. Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their
comments on this notice must submit with those comments a self-
addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made:
``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2022-1351/Airspace Docket No. 22-ASW-22.''
The postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at
www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Federal Aviation Administration, Air Traffic
Organization, Central Service Center, Operations Support Group, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 19, 2022, and effective
September 15, 2022. FAA Order JO 7400.11G is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11G
lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service
routes, and reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 by removing the
Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at
Alta Vista Ranch Airport, Marfa, TX.
    This action is the result of the closure of the airport.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order JO 7400.11G, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September
15, 2022, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class
E airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in FAA Order JO 7400.11.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 19,
2022, and effective September 15, 2022, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASW TX E5 Marfa, Alta Vista Ranch Airport, TX [Remove]

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 31, 2022.
Martin A. Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2022-23993 Filed 11-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 175 (Friday, September 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55899-55900]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23081]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings No. 2

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2518-000.
    Applicants: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company, LLC
submits tariff filing per 154.204: CEGT LLC--Negotiated Rate--September
2011 to be effective 9/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5108.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2519-000.
    Applicants: Colorado Interstate Gas Company.
    Description: Colorado Interstate Gas Company submits tariff filing
per 154.203: Spruce Hill Compliance Filing to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5112.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2520-000.
    Applicants: TWP Pipeline LLC.
    Description: TWP Pipeline LLC submits tariff filing per 154.402:
TWP Pipeline LLC ACA Filing to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5124.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2521-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Dominion Transmission, Inc. submits tariff filing per
154.402: DTI--2011 Annual Charge Adjustment to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5127.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2522-000.
    Applicants: Central New York Oil and Gas, LLC.
    Description: Central New York Oil and Gas, LLC submits tariff
filing per 154.203: CNYOG FWS Tariff Filing in Compliance With Docket
No. CP10-194-000 to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5131.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2523-000.
    Applicants: Dominion South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Dominion South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff
filing per 154.402: DSP--2011 Annual Charge Adjustment to be effective
10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5132.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2524-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Southcross Non-conforming Agreement Filing to be effective
9/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5150.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2525-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gulf Transmission Company.
    Description: Columbia Gulf Transmission Company's Annual Cash-Out
Report.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5166.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2526-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.402: TETLP ACA 2011 FILING to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5172.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2527-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.402: AGT ACA 2011 FILING to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5174.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2528-000.
    Applicants: Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, LLC submits tariff
filing per 154.402: MNUS ACA 2011 FILING to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5175.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2529-000.
    Applicants: National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation.
    Description: National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation submits tariff
filing per 154.204: Beacon--Non-conforming (Line N) to be effective 9/
22/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5177.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2530-000.
    Applicants: Central New York Oil and Gas, LLC.
    Description: Central New York Oil and Gas, LLC submits tariff
filing per 154.204: CNYOG Substitute Pro Forma Firm Wheeling Service
Agreement to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5178.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2531-000.
    Applicants: Stingray Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Stingray Pipeline Company, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Annual Charge Adjustment and Event Tracker filing to be
effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5188.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2532-000.
    Applicants: Colorado Interstate Gas Company.
    Description: Colorado Interstate Gas Company submits tariff filing
per 154.403(d)(2): Quarterly FL&U 10/1/11 to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5190.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2533-000.
    Applicants: MIGC LLC.
    Description: MIGC LLC submits tariff filing per 154.402: MIGC LLC
2011 ACA Filing to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/01/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110901-5000.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2534-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Enbridge 34685 to Central Crude Capacity Release
Negotiated Rate Agreement to be effective 9/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/01/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110901-5060.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2535-000.
    Applicants: Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company LLC.

    Description: Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company LLC submits tariff
filing per 154.204: BP K37-8 Amendment to Negotiated Rate Agreement
Filing to be effective 9/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/01/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110901-5065.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2536-000.
    Applicants: Panther Interstate Pipeline Energy, LLC.
    Description: Panther Interstate Pipeline Energy, LLC submits tariff
filing per 154.402: Panther 2011 ACA Filing to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/01/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110901-5068.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2537-000.
    Applicants: American Midstream (AlaTenn), LLC.
    Description: American Midstream (AlaTenn), LLC submits tariff
filing per 154.402: AlaTenn ACA Filing to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/01/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110901-5082.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2538-000.
    Applicants: American Midstream (Midla), LLC.
    Description: American Midstream (Midla), LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.402: Midla ACA Filing to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/01/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110901-5083.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2539-000.
    Applicants: MarkWest Pioneer, LLC.
    Description: MarkWest Pioneer, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.403(d)(2): MarkWest Pioneer--Quarterly FRP Filing to be effective
10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/01/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110901-5086.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2540-000.
    Applicants: Big Sandy Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Big Sandy Pipeline, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Negotiated Rate Agreement--Nytis Exploration to be effective
9/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/01/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110901-5093.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 13, 2011.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2450-001.
    Applicants: WestGas InterState, Inc.
    Description: WestGas InterState, Inc. submits tariff filing per
154.205(b): 20110831 WGI ACA Refile to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5133.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-1403-001.
    Applicants: Sabine Pipe Line LLC.
    Description: Sabine Pipe Line LLC submits tariff filing per
154.203: Compliance with NAESB v1.8 and v1.9 to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5157.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2404-001.
    Applicants: KO Transmission Company.
    Description: KO Transmission Company submits tariff filing per
154.205(b): Amendment to 2011 ACA Filing to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5171.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2444-001.
    Applicants: Hardy Storage Company, LLC.
    Description: Hardy Storage Company, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.205(b): ACA Errata 2011 to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110831-5183.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2481-001.
    Applicants: Dauphin Island Gathering Partners.
    Description: Dauphin Island Gathering Partners submits tariff
filing per 154.205(b): ACA 2011 Revision to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/01/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110901-5003.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2482-001.
    Applicants: Cimarron River Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Cimarron River Pipeline, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.205(b): ACA 2011 Amended to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/01/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110901-5005.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1964-002.
    Applicants: Questar Pipeline Company.
    Description: Questar Pipeline Company submits tariff filing per
154.203: RP11-1964-001 Compliance Filing to be effective 5/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/01/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110901-5069.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 13, 2011.

    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, and service can be found at:
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other
information, call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-
8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-23081 Filed 9-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P