[Federal Register: September 22, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 184)]
[Notices]
[Page 54644-54646]
[DOCID:fr22se08-91]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-58555; File No. PCAOB-2008-01]

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; Order Approving
Proposed Rule on Auditing Standard No. 6, Evaluating Consistency of
Financial Statements, and Conforming Amendments

September 16, 2008.

I. Introduction

    On February 1, 2008, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(the ``Board'' or the ``PCAOB'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') Proposed Auditing Standard No. 6,
Evaluating Consistency of Financial Statements, (``Auditing Standard
No.

6''), and Conforming Amendments, pursuant to Section 107 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the ``Act'') and Section 19(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Exchange Act'').
    Auditing Standard No. 6 will supersede the PCAOB's interim auditing
standard on evaluating consistency, AU section 420, Consistency of
Application of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Auditing
Standard No. 6 will establish requirements and provide direction for an
auditor's evaluation of the consistency of financial statements,
including changes to previously issued financial statements, and the
effect of that evaluation on the auditor's report on financial
statements.
    The Board's proposed conforming amendments affect several of the
Board's interim auditing standards. Those standards are: AU section
328, Auditing Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, AU section 410,
Adherence to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, AU section 411,
The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, AU section 431, Adequacy of Disclosure in
Financial Statements, AU section 508, Reports on Audited Financial
Statements, and AU section 561, Subsequent Discovery of Facts Existing
at the Date of the Auditor's Report. With the exception of the proposed
amendment to AU section 411, the Commission believes the aforementioned
amendments are generally technical or conforming in nature, such as
updating references in the interim standards to the proposed new
standard's paragraph numbers and definitions.
    The proposed amendment to AU section 411 will have the effect of
removing the hierarchy for accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States (the ``U.S. GAAP hierarchy'') from the PCAOB's
auditing standards. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (the
``FASB'') recently issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(``SFAS'') No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, which will include the current U.S. GAAP hierarchy going
forward.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The FASB issued SFAS No. 162 on May 9, 2008. SFAS No. 162
becomes effective 60 days after the date of this approval order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice of the proposed standard and the conforming amendments was
published in the Federal Register on August 5, 2008.\2\ The Commission
received three comment letters on the proposed rules and amendments.
For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is granting approval of
the proposed standard and conforming amendments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Release No. 34-58259 (July 30, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description

    The Act established the PCAOB to oversee the audits of public
companies and related matters, in order to protect the interests of
investors and further the public interest in preparation of
informative, accurate and independent audit reports. Section 103(a) of
the Act directs the PCAOB to establish auditing and related attestation
standards, quality control standards, and ethics standards to be used
by registered public accounting firms in the preparation and issuance
of audit reports as required by the Act or the rules of the Commission.
    On January 29, 2008, the Board adopted Auditing Standard No. 6,
Evaluating Consistency of Financial Statements, and amendments to the
Board's interim auditing standards. The Board proposed these changes to
its auditing standards in response to two actions of the FASB.
    First, in May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections, which superseded Accounting Principles
Board (``APB'') Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes. SFAS No. 154
establishes, unless impracticable, retrospective application as the
required method for reporting a change in accounting principle in the
absence of explicit transition requirements specific to a newly adopted
accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 also redefines the term
``restatement'' to refer only to ``the process of revising previously
issued financial statements to reflect the correction of an error in
those financial statements.'' \3\ Under SFAS No. 154, therefore, the
term ``restatement'' does not refer to changes made to previously
issued financial statements to reflect a change in accounting
principle.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See SFAS No. 154, paragraph 2j.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    AU section 420, Consistency of Application of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, the Board's interim standard on the auditor's
responsibilities for evaluating the consistency of the application of
generally accepted accounting principles (``GAAP''), generally
reflected the provisions of APB Opinion No. 20, which was superseded by
SFAS No. 154. To better align the Board's standards with the new
accounting standard, the Board adopted a new auditing standard on
evaluating consistency, which will supersede AU section 420, and
conforming amendments to AU section 508, Reports on Audited Financial
Statements, of its interim auditing standards.
    Second, in 2005, the FASB issued an exposure draft of a proposed
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles. The FASB proposed that this standard
incorporate the hierarchy found in the current auditing standards into
the accounting standards. Historically, a description of the U.S. GAAP
hierarchy has resided only in the auditing standards. However, because
the current U.S. GAAP hierarchy identifies the sources of accounting
principles and the framework for selecting principles to be used in
preparing financial statements, the PCAOB and the FASB believed that
these requirements are more appropriately located in the FASB's
accounting standards. Accordingly, the PCAOB adopted amendments to its
auditing standards to remove the U.S. GAAP hierarchy.
    In May 2008, the FASB issued in final form, SFAS No. 162, The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. SFAS No. 162
will become effective 60 days from the date of this order approving
Auditing Standard No. 6 and conforming amendments.
    In addition to proposing Auditing Standard No. 6 and the amendment
to AU section 411, the PCAOB proposed amendments to other interim
auditing standards and related interpretations. The Commission believes
the amendments to AU section 328, Auditing Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures, AU section 410, Adherence to Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, AU section 431, Adequacy of Disclosure in Financial
Statements, AU section 508, Reports on Audited Financial Statements,
and AU section 561, Subsequent Discovery of Facts Existing at the Date
of the Auditor's Report, are technical or conforming in nature.
    As discussed further below, one of the proposed amendments to AU
section 431, Adequacy of Disclosure in Financial Statements, proposes
to delete footnote 1 to paragraph 4 of AU section 431, which is an
application of the AICPA's Code of Professional Conduct regarding the
disclosure of confidential client information. In 2003, when the Board
adopted certain AICPA rules and ASB standards as interim Board
standards, the Board did not adopt Rule 301. Consistent with that
action, the proposed amendments would eliminate the reference to Rule
301 that is included in paragraph 4 of AU section Sec. 431.
    The proposed Auditing Standard No. 6 and amendments to the Board's

interim standards are intended to update and clarify the auditing
standards in light of SFAS No. 154 and SFAS No. 162. In particular,
these updates and clarifications are intended to enhance the clarity of
auditor reporting on accounting changes and corrections of
misstatements by distinguishing between these events.

III. Discussion

    The Commission received three comment letters in response to its
request for comments on Auditing Standard No. 6 and conforming
amendments. The comment letters came from three registered public
accounting firms.\4\ All three commenters expressed support for the
Commission's approval of the proposed standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Deloitte and Touche LLP, Grant Thornton LLP, and
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted above, the PCAOB's proposed amendment to AU section 431
deletes a reference to Rule 301 of the AICPA's Code of Professional
Conduct--a rule the PCAOB did not adopt as part of its original interim
standards. Similar to comments made to the PCAOB during its comment
period, one commenter believed concerns exist that the Board's action
in removing a reference to a rule the PCAOB did not adopt might be
construed as minimizing the auditor's responsibilities for maintaining
the confidentiality of client information. The commenter requested that
the Commission encourage the PCAOB to adopt a rule establishing the
auditor's responsibility with respect to maintaining the
confidentiality of client information.
    In its adopting release, the PCAOB discussed the concerns the
comments raised about client confidentiality and noted its awareness of
many auditors' legal or professional obligations to maintain the
confidentiality of client information, and made reference to the
confidentiality requirements included in the provisions of the Uniform
Accountancy Act and the provisions of the International Federation of
Accountants' Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants. The PCAOB
also noted that its decision to omit Rule 301 from its interim
standards was based on a determination that incorporation of that rule
was not necessary to fulfill the Board's mandate under Section
103(a)(1) and (3) of the Act at that time, and that it did not reflect
a decision that auditor confidentiality requirements imposed by other
authorities were inappropriate. Similarly, in amending AU section 431,
the PCAOB noted that it seeks neither to modify nor detract from
existing confidentiality requirements.
    The Commission agrees with the Board's proposed action to remove
from its interim standards a reference to a rule it did not adopt.
However, the Commission encourages the PCAOB to develop and adopt a
rule addressing the auditor's responsibility with respect to
maintaining the confidentiality of client information.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ One commenter also noted that the adoption of Auditing
Standard No. 6 would cause existing published PCAOB Staff Questions
and Answers to require updating. The Commission encourages the PCAOB
to ensure that its guidance is up to date with its current standards
and presumes the PCAOB will update these Questions and Answers once
these amendments are approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that proposed
Auditing Standard No. 6 and the Conforming Amendments are consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the securities laws and are
necessary and appropriate in the public interest and for the protection
of investors.
    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 107 of the Act and
Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act, that proposed Auditing Standard
No. 6, Evaluating Consistency of Financial Statements, and Conforming
Amendments (File No. PCAOB-2008-01) be and hereby are approved.

    By the Commission.
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-22015 Filed 9-19-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 18, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48431-48435]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22502]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2017-0082; FRL-9969-64-Region 5]

Air Plan Approval; Illinois; Regional Haze Progress Report

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving the
regional haze progress report under the Clean Air Act (CAA) as a
revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan (SIP). Illinois has
satisfied the progress report requirements of the Regional Haze Rule.
Illinois has also met the requirements for a determination of the
adequacy of its regional haze plan with its negative declaration
submitted with the progress report.

DATES: This direct final rule will be effective December 18, 2017,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by November 17, 2017. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2017-0082 at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Hatten, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategy Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. Background
II. EPA's Analysis of Illinois's Regional Haze Progress Report and
Adequacy Determination
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    States are required to submit a progress report every five years
that evaluates progress towards the Reasonable Progress Goals (RPGs)
for each mandatory Class I Federal area \1\ (Class I area) within the
state and in each Class I area outside the state which may be affected
by emissions from within the state. See 40 CFR 51.308(g). States are
also required to submit, at the same time as the progress report, a
determination of the adequacy of the state's existing regional haze
SIP. See 40 CFR 51.308(h). The first progress report must be submitted
in the form of a SIP revision and is due five years after the submittal
of the initial regional haze SIP. On June 24, 2011, Illinois submitted
its first regional haze SIP in accordance with the requirements of 40
CFR 51.308. EPA approved Illinois' regional haze plan into its SIP on
July 6, 2012, 77 FR 39943.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Areas designated as mandatory Class I Federal areas consist
of national parks exceeding 6000 acres, wilderness areas and
national memorial parks exceeding 5000 acres, and all international
parks that were in existence on August 7, 1977 (42 U.S.C. 7472(a)).
Listed at 40 CFR part 81, subpart D.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On February 1, 2017, Illinois submitted a SIP revision consisting
of a report on the progress made in the first implementation period
towards the RPGs for Class I areas outside of Illinois (progress
report). Illinois does not have any Class I areas within its borders.
This progress report included a determination that Illinois' existing
regional haze SIP requires no substantive revision to achieve the
established regional haze visibility improvement and emissions
reduction goals for 2018. EPA is approving Illinois' progress report on
the basis that it satisfies the requirements of 40 CFR 51.308.

II. EPA's Analysis of Illinois's Regional Haze Progress Report and
Adequacy Determination

    On February 1, 2017, Illinois EPA submitted the progress report as
a revision to its regional haze SIP to address progress made in the
first planning period towards RPGs for Class I areas that are affected
by emissions from Illinois' sources. The progress report included a
determination of the adequacy of the state's existing regional haze
SIP.
    Illinois has no Class I areas within its borders. In the initial
SIP, the following Class I areas are identified as sites that may be
affected by emissions from within Illinois: Sipsey Wilderness Area
(Alabama), Caney Creek Wilderness Area and Upper Buffalo Wilderness
Area (Arkansas), Great Gulf Wilderness Area (New Hampshire), Boundary
Waters Canoe Wilderness Area (Minnesota), Brigantine Wilderness Area
(New Jersey), Great Smoky Mountains National Park (North Carolina, and
Tennessee), Mammoth Cave National Park (Kentucky), Acadia National Park
and Moosehorn Wilderness Area (Maine), Isle Royale National Park and
Seney Wilderness Area (Michigan), Hercules-Glades Wilderness Area and
Mingo Wilderness Area (Missouri), Lye Brook Wilderness (Vermont), James
River Face Wilderness and Shenandoah National Park (Virginia), and
Dolly Sods/Otter Creek Wilderness (West Virginia).
    In developing the Long Term Strategy (LTS), the original Illinois
regional haze SIP determined that ``on-the-books'' controls, together
with best available retrofit technology (BART) controls, would
constitute the measures necessary to address Illinois' contribution to
visibility impairment in the Class I areas at which emissions from
Illinois contribute. This was supported by modeling assessments from
the Midwest Regional Planning Organization (MRPO) and in consultation
with other states and Regional Planning Organizations.

A. Regional Haze Progress Report SIP Elements

    The following sections discuss the information provided by Illinois
in the progress report. Each section describes Illinois' applicable
progress report submission along with EPA's analysis and proposed
determination as to whether the submission met the

applicable requirements of 40 CFR 51.308.
1. Status of Implementation of All Measures Included in the Regional
Haze SIP
    Illinois provided the status of implementation of all control
measures as required by 40 CFR 51.308(g)(1). Illinois identified
control measures regulated explicitly for the purposes of the regional
haze program, as well as additional control measures that were expected
to take effect within the first planning period. The regional haze
controls implemented by Illinois include both BART and a LTS.
    In its original regional haze SIP, Illinois relied primarily on
three control strategies for meeting its regional haze requirements to
ensure reasonable progress: \2\ (1) Federal consent decrees for two
petroleum refineries; (2) source-specific limits for three power plants
that were included in Federally enforceable permits; and, (3) emission
reductions from the vast majority of state's electric generating unit
(EGU) fleet resulting from the Multi-Pollutant Standard (MPS) and the
Combined Pollutant Standard (CPS) regulatory requirements found in
Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code (35 IAC), Mercury Rule,
Part 225, Subpart B--Control of Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired
Electric Generating Units (Part 225). These elements of Illinois' SIP
satisfied the requirements for BART in 40 CFR 51.308(e). All three
control strategies have been implemented or are being implemented on
the schedules approved in the SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Illinois did not rely upon the Clean Air Interstate Rule
(CAIR) or the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) for its
regional haze SIP, and thus, has avoided the issues that presented
themselves in other states due to their reliance on CAIR and CSAPR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to these control measures being implemented, in Section
1.2 of the report Illinois identified a list of ``on-the-books''
control measures used in the MRPO's modeling for Illinois' SIP that the
state expected to implement between 2002 and 2018. These ``on-the-
books'' control measures are being implemented as planned or in a
manner at least as stringent as anticipated at the time of the original
haze plan submittal. More detailed information regarding the
implementation dates of the various control measures can be found in
Appendix A of the report.
    Illinois did not rely on additional emissions controls from other
states in its regional haze strategy. In Section 1.3 of the report,
Illinois noted the following additional control measures not considered
in Illinois' regional haze SIP which are expected to contribute to
further reduction of sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions before
2018: Compliance with the 2010 SO2 National Ambient Air
Quality Standard, and the Federal Tier 3 Vehicle Emissions and Fuel
Standard Program (2014).
    The report noted that in 2015 Illinois adopted regulations that set
statewide fuel sulfur standards for stationary sources at 1000 parts
per million (ppm) for residual oil and 15 ppm for distillate fuel oil.
These regulatory requirements were to be implemented by January 1,
2017.
    EPA concludes that Illinois has adequately addressed the status of
control measures in its regional haze SIP as required by 40 CFR
51.308(g)(1).
2. Summary of Emissions Reductions Achieved in the State Through
Implementation of Measures
    In its progress report, Illinois provided a summary of emission
reductions achieved through implementation of control strategies
described in the above paragraph as required by 40 CFR 51.308(g)(1).
    Illinois' reliance upon the MPS and CPS from 35 IAC 225, the
source-specific limits incorporated into Federally enforceable permits
for three power plants, and requirements contained in Federal consent
decrees for two petroleum refineries have resulted in significant
emission reductions of nitrogen oxides (NOX) and
SO2. In Section 2.0 of the progress report, Illinois
provided emissions data from the base year 2002 for the regional haze
rule, projections of emissions for 2015 and 2018, and actual emissions
data from EPA's Air Markets Program Data. These data indicate that
greater reductions of NOX and SO2 emissions have
occurred in 2015 at regulated sources than were anticipated for the
entire first implementation period ending in 2018.
    The additional emission reductions reported in Section 2.0 were
based on other factors such as the shutting down or conversion of coal-
fired EGUs to combustion of other fuels, and control measures related
to Federal requirements such as, Maximum Achievable Control Technology
and the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards. The report shows that
emission reduction of visibility-impairing pollutants in Illinois have
been greater than anticipated at the time of its regional haze plan
submittal.
    EPA finds the summary of emission reductions achieved from control
strategy implementation adequately addresses the applicable provisions
of 40 CFR 51.308(g)(2).
3. Assessment of Visibility Conditions and Changes for Each Mandatory
Class I Federal Area in the State
    Illinois does not have any Class I areas within its boundaries, and
as the applicable provisions pertain only to states containing Class I
areas, no further discussion is necessary. EPA concludes that Illinois
has adequately addressed the applicable provisions of 40 CFR 51.308(g).
4. Analysis Tracking Emissions Changes of Visibility-Impairing
Pollutants
    In its progress report, Illinois provided an analysis tracking the
emissions progress over the past five years, as required by 40 CFR
51.308(g)(4). Illinois based its report on the most recent updated
emissions inventory to account for emission changes during the
applicable five-year period. The analysis includes emissions of
SO2, NOX, ammonia (NH3), volatile
organic compound (VOC), and direct emissions of fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) for the years 2010 to 2014 (the most recent year for
which Illinois has a full quality-assured inventory). In order to
provide a five-year analysis with data from years with full quality-
assured inventories, Illinois EPA has interpolated 2010 inventory data
from its 2008 and 2011 inventories.
    Table 1 below contains Illinois inventory data aggregated by source
type for each visibility-impairing pollutant. This data shows
significant reductions in Illinois emissions of SO2 (40%
reduction) and NOX (15% reduction) while showing slight
increases or decreases in emissions of PM2.5 (0.15%
increase), VOC (0.5% increase), and NH3 (4% reduction).

                                                       Table 1--Illinois Emissions by Source Type
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  SO2 (tpy)             NOX (tpy)            PM2.5 (tpy)            VOC (tpy)             NH3 (tpy)
                Source type                -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               2010       2014       2010       2014       2010       2014       2010       2014       2010       2014
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Source..............................    311,447    182,200    151,017     99,753     10,929     14,261     45,598     42,345      1,622      1,901

Area Source...............................      5,733      5,688     45,150     58,012    119,001    118,411    166,221    172,831     69,916     68,177
On-Road Mobile............................      1,037      1,040    187,348    174,774      5,290      5,286     70,721     73,769      6,048      3,868
Off-Road Mobile...........................      1,994      2,576    144,695    116,965      9,596      7,074     77,368     72,795         96        109
Animal Husbandry..........................          0  .........          0  .........          0  .........          0  .........     45,826     44,442
                                           -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.................................    320,232    191,504    528,211    449,504    144,816    145,032    359,909    361,740    123,507    118,496
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An additional table in the report shows the significant reductions
in SO2 and NOX emissions were driven primarily by
reductions from the EGU sector. Illinois anticipates that this trend
will continue in 2015 and beyond, due to further increases in the
stringency of the state regulations and additional coal-fired EGUs in
Illinois being retired or converted to natural gas combustion.
    Emissions of VOC and PM2.5 appear to have increased
slightly over the five-year period. However, Illinois EPA analysis
indicates that this apparent increase is due mainly to changes in
inventory methodologies. While VOC emissions in Illinois decreased for
many subcategories in the inventory summary, these reductions are
overwhelmed by the significant increase in the ``Petroleum and Related
Industries'' subcategory. With respect to calculating the proportion of
PM2.5 in source emissions, Illinois determined that the
apparent increase in PM2.5 emissions is from the EGU sector,
while overall PM emissions, fuel usage, and emissions of other
pollutants for the EGU sector showed significant reductions.
    Overall emissions of visibility-impairing pollutants in Illinois
have declined over the five-year period between 2010 and 2014. Again,
the regional haze SIP for Illinois control strategies focused primarily
on reductions of SO2 and NOX.
    EPA finds that the analysis tracking the emissions progress over
the past five years adequately addresses the applicable provisions of
40 CFR 51.308(g).
5. Assessment of Changes Impeding Visibility Progress
    The Regional Haze Rule at 40 CFR 51.308(g)(5) requires an
assessment of any significant changes in emissions over the past five
years that have impeded progress in improving visibility.
    In the progress report, Illinois has not identified any significant
changes in anthropogenic emissions within Illinois that have occurred
over the last five years that would limit or impede progress in
improving visibility. Illinois reports that there have been no
significant unexpected increases in emissions in the past five years.
Likewise, Illinois reports that there have been no projected decreases
in pollutant emissions from the regional haze SIP that have not been
realized. Data detailed in Sections 2.0 and 4.0 of Illinois' progress
report show Illinois achieving emission reductions of SO2
and NOX beyond the projected emission reductions in the
original regional haze SIP.
    Because Illinois does not contain any Federal Class I areas,
Illinois is not required to assess whether emission increases outside
the state are causing a Class I area within the state to be adversely
affected. Thus, EPA concludes that Illinois has adequately addressed
the applicable provisions of 40 CFR 50.308.
6. Assessment of Current Strategy
    In its progress report, Illinois submits that the elements and
strategies outlined in its original regional haze SIP are sufficient to
enable Illinois and states where Illinois contributes to visibility
impairments to meet all established RPGs. To support this conclusion,
Illinois has implemented, or will implement by 2018, all controls from
its regional haze plan. In the progress report, Illinois states that
good progress has been made in reducing in visibility-impairing
pollutants in the last five years. The state noted that it is on track
to meet its 2018 goals for emission reductions before the end of 2018
for key pollutants, SO2 and NOX. Section 2.0 of
the progress report, provides actual emissions data showing significant
emissions reductions in visibility impairing pollutants in 2015 that
have already exceeded the projected emission reductions in the Illinois
by 2018.
    EPA agrees that Illinois' assessment of strategies outlined in its
regional haze SIP has adequately addressed the applicable provisions of
40 CFR 50.308.
7. Review of the State's Visibility Monitoring Strategy
    Illinois's progress report indicates that there are no Class I
areas within its borders. EPA concludes that because Illinois does not
have any Class I areas within its borders and therefore is not required
to address the applicable provisions related to review of the state's
visibility monitoring strategy, the state has adequately addressed the
applicable provisions of 40 CFR 51.308.

B. Determination of Adequacy of the Existing Regional Haze Plan

    The rule at 40 CFR 51.308(h) requires a determination of adequacy
for the regional haze plan to be submitted at the same time as the
progress report. The rule requires the state to select from four
options based on the information given in the progress report. Illinois
submitted a negative declaration that further substantive revisions to
its regional haze plan are not needed at this time. Illinois determined
that its regional haze plan is adequate to meet the regional haze rule
requirements and expects Class I areas affected by Illinois to achieve
the reasonable progress goals. The nearest Class I area outside the
state of Illinois is either in southwestern Missouri or northern
Michigan. See 77 FR 3966, 3967 (January 12, 2012). Illinois reports
that it is on track to meet the visibility improvement and emission
reduction goals. EPA agrees that the current Illinois regional haze
plan is adequate to achieve these goals.

C. Public Participation and Federal Land Manager (FLM) Consultation

    On June 23, 2016, Illinois provided an opportunity for FLMs to
review the revision to Illinois' SIP reporting on progress made during
the first implementation period toward RPGs for Class I areas outside
the state that are affected by emissions from Illinois' sources. This
was 60 days in advance of the public hearing.
    Illinois' progress report includes the FLMs comments received and
responses to those comments in Appendix A in the progress report.

    Illinois also published notification for a public hearing and
solicitation for comments in the Illinois Register on October 7, 2016,
with the public comment period commencing on that day and ending on
November 6, 2016. Illinois received no request for a public hearing.
Illinois received one public comment during the public comment period.
The state provided a response to the comment, regarding the Illinois
regional haze report.
    EPA finds that Illinois has addressed the applicable requirements
in Sec.  51.308(i) regarding FLM consultation.

III. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is approving the regional haze progress report submitted on
February 1, 2017, as a revision to the Illinois SIP. Illinois has
satisfied the progress report requirements of 40 CFR 51.308(g). EPA
also finds that Illinois has met the 40 CFR 51.308(h) requirements for
a determination of the adequacy of its regional haze plan with its
negative declaration also submitted on February 1, 2017.
    We are publishing this action without prior proposal because we
view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the state plan if relevant adverse
written comments are filed. This rule will be effective December 18,
2017 without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written
comments by November 17, 2017. If we receive such comments, we will
withdraw this action before the effective date by publishing a
subsequent document that will withdraw the final action. All public
comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed action. EPA will not institute a second comment
period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do
so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those
provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
If we do not receive any comments, this action will be effective
December 18, 2017.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by December 18, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of this Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: September 28, 2017.
Robert A. Kaplan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  52.720, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an
entry for ``Regional Haze Progress Report''

immediately following the entry for ``Regional haze plan'' to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.720  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

                       EPA-Approved Illinois Nonregulatory and Quasi-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 Applicable geographic       State
     Name of SIP provision       or nonattainment area  submittal date  EPA approval date         Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
Regional Haze Progress Report.  Statewide.............        02/01/17  10/18/17, [Insert  .....................
                                                                         Federal Register
                                                                         citation].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2017-22502 Filed 10-17-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 1, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 37455]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15996]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 721

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2017-0366; FRL-9981-16]
RIN 2070-AB27

Significant New Use Rules on Certain Chemical Substances

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing significant new use rules (SNURs) under the
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for 145 chemical substances which
were the subject of premanufacture notices (PMNs). The chemical
substances are subject to Orders issued by EPA pursuant to section 5(e)
of TSCA. This action would require persons who intend to manufacture
(defined by statute to include import) or process any of these 145
chemical substances for an activity that is designated as a significant
new use by this rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing
that activity. The required notification initiates EPA's evaluation of
the intended use within the applicable review period. Persons may not
commence manufacture or processing for the significant new use until
EPA has conducted a review of the premanufacture notice, made an
appropriate determination on the notification, and has taken such
actions as are required with that determination. In addition to this
notice of proposed rulemaking, EPA is issuing the action as a direct
final rule elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 31, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2017-0366, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: Document Control Office (7407M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    For technical information contact: Kenneth Moss, Chemical Control
Division (7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
[email protected].
    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In addition to this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, EPA is issuing the action as a direct final rule elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register. For further information about
the proposed significant new use rules, please see the information
provided in the direct final action, with the same title, that is
located in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this issue of the
Federal Register.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721

    Environmental protection, Chemicals, Hazardous substances,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: July 19, 2018.
Jeffery T. Morris,
Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2018-15996 Filed 7-31-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 69 (Thursday, April 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19960-19965]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08111]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Public Notice for Waiver of Aeronautical Land-Use Assurance

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent of waiver with respect to land; Cleveland
Hopkins International, Cleveland, Ohio.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is considering a proposal to change approximately 2.54
acres of airport land from aeronautical use to non-aeronautical use and
to authorize the lease of airport property located at Cleveland Hopkins
International, Cleveland, Ohio. The aforementioned land is not needed
for aeronautical use.
    The property is located near the northwest corner of Brook Park
Road and Rocky River Drive, north of the airport and outside the
airport fence line. The property is currently vacant land not being
used by the airport and is flat, weedy, and grassy. The property will
be leased for the development of a gas/service station.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 12, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review by appointment at the FAA
Airports District Office, Marlon Pe[ntilde]a, Program Manager, Detroit
Airport District Office, 11677 South Wayne Road, Suite 107, Romulus,
Michigan 48174, Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>/Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER> and
Cleveland Hopkins International Airport, 5300 Riverside Drive,
Cleveland, Ohio 44181, Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Written comments on the Sponsor's request must be delivered or
mailed to: Marlon Pe[ntilde]a, Program Manager, Federal Aviation
Administration, Airports District Office, Detroit Airport District
Office, 11677 South Wayne Road, Suite 107, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

Telephone Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>/FAX Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlon Pe[ntilde]a, Program Manager,
Federal Aviation Administration, Airports District Office, Detroit
Airport District Office, 11677 South Wayne Road, Suite 107, Romulus,
Michigan 48174. Telephone Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>/FAX Number: (734) 229-
2950.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with section 47107(h) of Title
49, United States Code, this notice is required to be published in the
Federal Register 30 days before modifying the land-use assurance that
requires the property to be used for an aeronautical purpose.
    The property was originally acquired by the City of Cleveland for
potential airport development. The Federal Aviation Administration did
not participate in the acquisition of this property. The U.S.
Government did not convey the property or transfer under surplus
property. The sponsor is now proposing to lease this parcel for Fair
Market Value and utilize the proceeds to help improve the existing
airport infrastructure and bring it up to FAA standards.
    The disposition of proceeds from the lease of the airport property
will be in accordance with FAA's Policy and Procedures Concerning the
Use of Airport Revenue, published in the Federal Register on February
16, 1999 (64 FR 7696). This notice announces that the FAA is
considering the release of the subject airport property at the
Cleveland Hopkins International, Cleveland, Ohio from its obligations
to be maintained for aeronautical purposes. Approval does not
constitute a commitment by the FAA to financially assist in the
disposal of the subject airport property nor a determination of
eligibility for grant-in-aid funding from the FAA.
    Following is a legal description of the property located in the
City of Cleveland, County of Cuyahoga, State of Ohio, and known as
being part of Original Rockport Section and described as follows:

PARCEL NO. 1

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA, AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP
SECTIONS NOS. 3 AND 4, AND ALL OF SUBLOTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 149, 150,
151 AND 152 IN WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP SECTIONS NOS. 3 AND 4, AS SHOWN BY THE RECORDED PLAT IN
VOLUME 70 OF MAPS, PAGE 28 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS, AND TOGETHER
FORMING A PARCEL OF LAND BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING
IN THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF ROCKY RIVER DRIVE SW., (70 FEET WIDE),
AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF WEST LAWN ROAD SW.;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID ROCKY
RIVER DRIVE SW., 148.27 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID
SUBLOT NO. 1; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SUBLOT NO. 1, 38.49 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE
OF SAID ROCKY RIVER DRIVE SW.; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID
CENTER LINE, 137.46 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID ORIGINAL
SECTION NO. 3, WHICH IS ALSO THE OLD CENTER LINE OF BROOKPARK ROAD,
SW., (30 FEET WIDE); THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE OLD CENTER LINE OF
BROOKPARK ROAD SW., 319.87 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE
SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF SUBLOT NO. 153 IN THE
WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION AS AFORESAID; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID
SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION AND ALONG THE EASTERLY OF LINE OF SAID SUBLOT
NO. 153, 125 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SUBLOT NO. 147 IN
SAID WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY
LINES OF SUBLOTS NOS. 147 AND 148 IN SAID WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION,
82.83 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID SUBLOT NO. 149;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBLOT NO. 149,
134.82 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID WEST LAWN ROAD SW.; THENCE
EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, 317.42 FEET TO THE PLACE OF
BEGINNING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE PART OF PREMISES DESCRIBED ABOVE
DEDICATED TO PUBLIC USE AS A PART OF BROOKPARK ROAD AS SHOWN ON THE
PLAT OF DEDICATION OF BROOKPARK ROAD IN VOLUME 127 OF MAPS, PAGE 29
OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART CONVEYED
TO THE STATE OF OHIO BY DEED DATED DECEMBER 28, 1978 AND FILED IN
VOLUME 14895, PAGE 765 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 2

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOT NO. 153 IN THE VAN DE BOE
HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP SECTIONS 3 AND 4 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28 OF
CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOT HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 73.67
FEET ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF BROOK PARK ROAD SW., AND EXTENDING
BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH 117.82 FEET AND HAVING A
REAR LINE OF 73.67 FEET.

PARCEL NO. 3

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOT NO. 148 AND PART OF SUBLOT
NO. 147 IN THE VAN DEBOE HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF
PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP SECTIONS NOS. 3 AND 4 AS RECORDED
IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS AND BOUNDED AND
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF WEST LAWN
AVENUE SW., (45 FEET WIDE) AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY
LINE OF SAID SUBLOT NO. 148; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY
LINE 40.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBLOT NO. 147; THENCE
S. 13[deg]39'42'' W. 21.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S. 3[deg]29'25''
W. 91.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID
EASTERLY LINE OF SUBLOT NO. 147, 23.58 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE
THEREOF; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE AND THE SOUTHERLY
LINE OF SUBLOT NO. 148, 50.50 FEET TO THE AFORESAID EASTERLY LINE OF
SUBLOT NO. 148; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 134.82
FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE ABOVE
DESCRIBED PREMISES THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OHIO BY
DEED DATED 1/20/1970 AND RECORDED 1/21/1970 IN VOLUME 12585, PAGE
339 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 4

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING PART OF SUBLOT NO. 147 IN THE VAN DEBOE
HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP SECTIONS NOS. 3 AND 4 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28 OF
CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS AND BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF WEST LAWN AVENUE SW., (45 FEET
WIDE) AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBLOT NO.
147; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF WEST LAWN AVENUE
40.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF; THENCE S. 13[deg]39'42'' W.
21.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S. 3[deg]29'25'' W. 91.00 FEET TO A
POINT; THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SUBLOT
NO. 147, 23.58 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE THEREOF; THENCE
WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 32.33 FEET TO A WESTERLY LINE
THEREOF; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE 22.82 FEET TO AN
ANGLE POINT THEREIN; THENCE EASTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID LAST
DESCRIBED COURSE 2.83 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBLOT NO.
147; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE 112.00 FEET TO THE
PLACE OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED
PREMISES, THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OHIO
BY DEED DATED

1/20/1970 AND RECORDED 1/21/1970 IN VOL. 12585, PG. 339 OF CUYAHOGA
COUNTY RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 5

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN BEING ALL OF SUBLOT NO. 146 IN THE VAN DEBOE
HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP SECTIONS NOS. 3 AND 4, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28 OF
CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOT HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 40.00
FEET ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF WEST LAWN AVE. SW., (45 FEET WIDE) A
EXTENDING BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH 112.00 FEET.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PREMISES, THAT PORTION OF
THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OHIO BY DEED DATED 1/20/1970
AND RECORDED 1/21/1970 IN VOL. 12585, PAGE 339 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY
RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 6

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOT NO. 145 IN THE VAN DEBOE
HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP SECTIONS 3 AND 4 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28 OF
CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOT HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 40.00
FEET ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF WEST LAWN AVENUE SW., AND EXTENDING
BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH 112.00 FEET AND HAVING A
REAR LINE OF 40.00 FEET. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED
PREMISES, THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OHIO
BY DEED DATED 1/20/1970 AND RECORDED 1/21/1970 IN VOL. 12585, PAGE
339 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 7

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOT NO. 144 IN THE VAN DEBOE
HAGER COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP
SECTIONS 3 AND 4 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28 OF CUYAHOGA
COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOT HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 40.00 FEET ON
THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF WEST LAWN AVENUE SW., AND EXTENDING BACK
BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH 112.00 FEET AND HAVING A REAR
LINE OF 40.00 FEET. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED
PREMISES, THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OHIO
BY DEED DATED 1/20/1970 AND RECORDED 1/21/1970 IN VOL. 12585, PAGE
339 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 8

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOT NOS. 140, 141, 142 AND 143
IN THE VAN DE-BOE HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF
ORIGINAL ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP, SECTIONS 3 AND 4, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME
70, PAGE 28 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOTS HAVING A
FRONTAGE OF 160.00 FEET ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF WEST LAWN AVENUE
SW., AND EXTENDING BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH 112.00
FEET AND HAVING A REAR LINE OF 160.00 FEET. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE
ABOVE DESCRIBED PREMISES, THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO
THE STATE OF OHIO BY DEED DATED 1/20/1970 AND RECORDED IN VOL.
12585, PAGE 339 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 9

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOT NO. 139 IN THE VAN DE-BOE
HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP, SECTIONS 3 AND 4, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28 OF
CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOT HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 45.00
FEET ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF WEST LAWN AVENUE SW., AND EXTENDING
BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH 112.00 FEET AND HAVING A
REAR LINE OF 45.00 FEET. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED
PREMISES, THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OHIO
BY DEED DATED 1/20/1970 AND RECORDED 1/21/1970 IN VOL. 12585, PAGE
339 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 10

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOT NO. 138 IN THE VAN DEBOE
HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP, SECTIONS 3 AND 4, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28 OF
CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOT HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 45.00
FEET ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF WEST LAWN AVENUE SW., AND EXTENDING
BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH 112.00 FEET; THE EASTERLY
LINE OF SAID SUBLOT BEING ALSO THE WESTERLY LINE OF WEST 191ST
STREET.

PARCEL NO. 11

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOT NOS. 25, 26, 27, 28, 29,
30, 35, 36, 130, 131, 135, AND 137 IN THE VAN DE-BOE HAGER COMPANY'S
WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP,
SECTIONS 3 AND 4, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28 OF CUYAHOGA
COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOTS NOS. 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 35,
36, EACH HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 40.00 FEET ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF
WEST LAWN AVENUE, SW. AND EXTENDING BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF
EQUAL DEPTH 112.00 FEET AND EACH HAVING A REAR LINE OF 40.00 FEET;
SAID SUBLOTS NOS. 130, 131 AND 135 EACH HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 40.00
FEET ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF WEST LAWN AVENUE SW., AND EXTENDING
BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH 112.00 FEET AND EACH
HAVING A REAR LINE OF 40.00 FEET; SAID SUBLOT NO. 137 HAVING A
FRONTAGE OF 45.00 FEET ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF WEST LAWN AVENUE SW.
AND EXTENDING BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH 112.00 FEET
AND HAVING A REAR LINE OF 45.00 EET. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE ABOVE
DESCRIBED PREMISES, THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE
STATE OF OHIO BY DEED DATED 1/20/1970 AND RECORDED 1/21/1970 IN VOL.
12585, PAGE 339 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 12

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO, AND KNOWN AS BEING SUBLOT NO. 136 IN WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION
OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP SECTIONS NOS. 3 AND 4, AS
SHOWN BY THE RECORDED PLAT IN VOLUME 70 OF MAPS, PAGE 28 OF CUYAHOGA
COUNTY RECORDS, AND BEING 45.00 FEET FRONT ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF
WEST LAWN ROAD, (NOW KNOWN AS WEST LAWN AVENUE SW.), AND EXTENDING
BACK OF EQUAL WIDTH 112.00 FEET DEEP, AS APPEARS BY SAID PLAT.

PARCEL NO. 13

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOT NO. 134 IN THE VAN DE BOE-
HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP SECTIONS 3 AND 4, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28 OF
CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOT NO. 134 HAVING A FRONTAGE
OF 40.00 FEET ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF WEST LAWN AVE., SW., AND
EXTENDING BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH 112.00 FEET AND
HAVING A REAR LINE OF 40.00 FEET.

PARCEL NO. 14

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING SUBLOTS NOS. 132 AND 133 ON WEST LAWN
AVENUE IN THE WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP, SECTION NO. 3 & 4, AS APPEARS BY SAID PLAT RECORDED IN
VOLUME 70 OF MAPS, PAGE 28 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 15

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOTS NOS. 128 AND 129 IN THE
VAN DEBOE HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL
ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP SECTIONS 3 AND 4 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28
OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOTS TOGETHER FORMING A
PARCEL OF LAND HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 80.00 FEET ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE
OF WEST LAWN AVENUE SW., AND EXTENDING BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES
OF EQUAL DEPTH 112.00 FEET AND HAVING A REAR LINE OF 80.00 FEET.

PARCEL NO. 16

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOTS NOS. 126 AND 127 IN THE
VAN DE BOE HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL
ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP SECTIONS 3 AND 4 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28
OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOTS TOGETHER FORMING A
PARCEL OF LAND HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 80.00 FEET ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE
OF WEST LAWN AVENUE SW., AND EXTENDING BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES
OF EQUAL DEPTH 112.00 FEET AND HAVING A REAR LINE OF 80.00 FEET.

PARCEL NO. 17

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING SUBLOT NO. 125, IN THE VAN DE BOE-HAGER
COMPANY'S ``WEST LAWN'' SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP SECTIONS NOS. 3 AND 4, AS SHOWN BY THE RECORDED PLAT IN
VOLUME 70 OF MAPS, PAGE 28 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 18

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOTS NOS. 124 AND 174 IN THE
VAN DE BOE-HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL
ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP SECTIONS 3 AND 4, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE
28 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOT NO. 124 HAVING A
FRONTAGE OF 40.00 FEET ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF WEST LAWN AVENUE
SW., AND EXTENDING BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH,
112.00 FEET AND HAVING A REAR LINE OF 40.00 FEET; SAID SUBLOT NO.
174 HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 40.00 FEET ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF
BROOKPARK ROAD SW., AND EXTENDING BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF
EQUAL DEPTH, 117.82 FEET AND HAVING A REAR LINE OF 40.00 FEET.

PARCEL NO. 19

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOT NO. 173 IN THE VAN DE BOE-
HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP SECTIONS 3 AND 4, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28 OF
CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOT HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 40.00
FEET ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF BROOK PARK ROAD SW., AND EXTENDING
BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH, 117.82 FEET AND HAVING A
REAR LINE OF 40.00 FEET.

PARCEL NO. 20

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING SUB LOT NOS. 171 AND 172 IN WEST LAWN
SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP SECTIONS NOS. 3 &
4, AS SHOWN BY THE RECORDED PLAT IN VOLUME 70 OF MAPS, PAGE 28 OF
CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 21

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOTS NOS. 169 AND 170 IN THE
VAN DEBOE HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL
ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP SECTIONS 3 AND 4 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28
OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOTS TOGETHER FORMING A
PARCEL OF LAND HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 80.00 FEET ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE
OF BROOK PARK ROAD, SW. AND EXTENDING BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF
EQUAL DEPTH 117.82 FEET AND HAVING A REAR LINE OF 80.00 FEET.

PARCEL NO. 22

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO, AND KNOWN AS BEING SUBLOT NOS. 167 AND 168 IN THE WEST LAWN
SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP, SECTIONS NOS. 3 &
4, AS SHOWN BY THE RECORDED PLAT IN VOLUME 70 OF MAPS, PAGE 28 OF
CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 23

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING SUB-LOTS NOS. 165 AND 166, IN THE VAN DE
BOE-HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL
ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP, SECTIONS 3 AND 4, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE
28 OF THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; TOGETHER FORMING A PARCEL OF
LAND HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 80.00 FEET ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF
BROOKPARK ROAD SW., AND EXTENDING BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF
EQUAL DEPTH 117.82 FEET AND HAVING A REAR LINE OF 80.00 FEET.

PARCEL NO. 24

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOT NO. 164 IN THE VAN DEBOE
HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP SECTIONS 3 AND 4 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28 OF
CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOT HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 40.00
FEET ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF BROOK PARK ROAD SW., AND EXTENDING
BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH 117.82 FEET AND HAVING A
REAR LINE OF 40.00 FEET.

PARCEL NO. 25

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING SUBLOT NO. 163 IN THE WEST LAWN
SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP SECTIONS NOS. 3
AND 4 AS SHOWN BY THE RECORDED IN VOLUME 70 OF MAPS, PAGE 28 OF
CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS, AND 40 FEET FRONT ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF
BROOKPARK ROAD AND EXTENDING BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES 117.82
FEET, AS APPEARS BY SAID PLAT.

PARCEL NO. 26

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING SUBLOT NO. 162 IN THE VAN DEBOE HAGER
COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP SECTIONS 3 AND 4 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28 OF
CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS; SAID SUBLOT HAVING A FRONT AGE OF 45.00
FEET ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF BROOK PARK ROAD SW., AND EXTENDING
BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH 117.82 FEET AND HAVING A
REAR LINE OF 45.00 FEET.

PARCEL NO. 27

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUB LOTS NOS. 160 AND 161 IN THE
VAN DEBOE-HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL
ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP SECTIONS 3 AND 4 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28
OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS, SAID SUBLOTS TOGETHER FORMING A PARCEL
OF LAND HAVING FRONTAGE OF 90.00 FEET ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF
BROOKPARK ROAD SW. AND EXTENDING BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF
EQUAL DEPTH 117.82 FEET AND HAVING A REAR LINE OF 90.00 FEET.

PARCEL NO. 28

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOTS NOS. 158 AND 159 IN THE
VAN DEBOE HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION, OF PART OF ORIGINAL
ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP SECTIONS 3 AND 4, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE
28 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOTS TOGETHER FORMING A
PARCEL OF LAND HAVING FRONTAGE OF 85.00 FEET ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE
OF BROOK PARK ROAD SW., AND EXTENDING BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF
EQUAL DEPTH 117.82 FEET AND

HAVING A REAR LINE OF 85.00 FEET; THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBLOT NO.
159 BEING ALSO THE EASTERLY LINE OF WEST 191ST STREET.

PARCEL NO. 29

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOTS NOS. 155, 156, 157 IN THE
VAN DE BOE-HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION, OF PART OF
ORIGINAL ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP SECTIONS 3 AND 4, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME
70, PAGE 28 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOTS EACH HAVING
A FRONTAGE OF 40.00 FEET ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF BROOKPARK ROAD
SW., AND EXTENDING BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH 117.82
FEET AND HAVING A REAR LINE OF 40.00 FEET, AS APPEARS BY SAID PLAT.

PARCEL NO. 30

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOT NO. 154 IN THE VAN DE BOE-
HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION, OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP SECTIONS 3 AND 4, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28 OF
CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOT NO. 154 HAVING A FRONTAGE
OF 43.50 FEET ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF BROOK PARK ROAD SW., AND
EXTENDING BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH, 117.82 FEET
AND HAVING A REAR LINE OF 43.50 FEET.

PARCEL NO. 31

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING SUB-LOT NO. 31 IN THE VAN DE BOE HAGER
COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP SECTIONS NOS. 3 AND 4, AS SHOWN BY THE RECORDED PLAT OF
SAID SUBDIVISION IN VOLUME 70 OF MAPS, PAGE 28 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY
RECORDS AND BEING 40 FEET FRONT ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF WEST LAWN
AVE. SW., AND EXTENDS BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES 112 FEET, AS
APPEARS BY SAID PLAT. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED
PREMISES, THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OHIO
BY DEED DATED 1/20/1970 AND RECORDED 1/21/1970 IN VOL. 12585, PAGE
339 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 32

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOTS NO. 32 IN THE VAN DE BOE-
HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP SECTIONS 3 AND 4, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28 OF
CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 40.00 FEET ON THE
NORTHERLY SIDE OF WEST LAWN AVENUE SW., AND EXTENDING BACK BETWEEN
PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH 112.00 FEET AND HAVING A REAR LINE OF
40.00 FEET. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PREMISES, THAT
PORTION OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OHIO BY DEED DATED
1/20/1970 AND RECORDED 1/21/1970 IN VOL. 12585, PAGE 339 OF CUYAHOGA
COUNTY RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 33

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING SUB-LOT NO. 33 IN THE VAN DE BOE HAGER
COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP SECTIONS NOS. 3 AND 4, AS SHOWN BY THE RECORDED PLAT OF
SAID SUBDIVISION IN VOLUME 70 OF MAPS, PAGE 28 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY
RECORDS, AND BEING 40 FEET FRONT ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF WEST LAWN
AVENUE SW., AND EXTENDING BACK OF EQUAL WIDTH 112 FEET, AS APPEARS
BY SAID PLAT. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PREMISES, THAT
PORTION OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OHIO BY DEED DATED
1/20/1970 AND RECORDED 1/21/1970 IN VOL. 12585, PAGE 339 OF CUYAHOGA
COUNTY RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 34

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOT NO. 34 IN THE VAN DEBOE
HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP SECTIONS 3 AND 4, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28 OF
CUYAHOGA COUNTY MAP RECORDS; SAID SUBLOT HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 40.00
FEET ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF WEST LAWN AVENUE SW. AND EXTENDING
BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH 112.00 FEET AND HAVING A
REAR LINE OF 40.00 FEET. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED
PREMISES, THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OHIO
BY DEED DATED 1/20/1970 AND RECORDED 1/21/1970 IN VOL. 12585, PAGE
339 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 35

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO: AND KNOWN AS BEING ALL OF SUBLOT NO. 37 IN THE VAN DEBOE
HAGER COMPANY'S WEST LAWN SUBDIVISION OF PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT
TOWNSHIP, SECTIONS NOS. 3 AND 4, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70, PAGE 28
OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS; SAID SUBLOT HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 40.00
FEET ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF WEST LAWN AVE. SW., (45 FEET WIDE) AND
EXTENDING BACK BETWEEN PARALLEL LINES OF EQUAL DEPTH 112.00 FEET.
    EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PREMISES, THAT PORTION
OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OHIO BY DEED DATED 1/20/
1970 AND RECORDED 1/21/1970 IN VOL. 12585, PAGE 339 OF CUYAHOGA
COUNTY RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 36

    THAT PORTION OF WEST LAWN AVENUE, SW. AND WEST 191ST STREET AS
SHOWN BY THE VACATION PLATS IN VOLUME 195 OF MAPS, PAGE 75 AND
VOLUME 217 OF MAPS, PAGE 57 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS. EXCEPTING
THEREFROM ANY OF THE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED PARCELS OF LAND, ANY
PORTION THEREOF WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF RELOCATED BROOKPARK ROAD, AS
SHOWN IN CENTERLINE SURVEY PLAT IN VOLUME 313 OF MAPS, PAGES 97, 98
AND 99 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 37

    SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AND STATE
OF OHIO AND KNOWN AS BEING PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT SECTION 3,
BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A STONE MONUMENT IN
THE CENTERLINE OF ROCKY RIVER DRIVE SW. AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION NO. 3 (WHICH IS ALSO THE CENTERLINE
OF BROOKPARK ROAD SW.); THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF
ROCKY RIVER DRIVE SW. 175 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION, 237.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AT
RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 159.24 FEET TO THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE WESTERLY ON SAID SOUTHERLY
LINE, 309.38 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING ONE ACRE
OF LAND.

EXCEPTION PARCELS

    EXCEPTING THEREFROM PARCEL NO. 592 WL-1 (HIGHWAY) AND PARCEL NO.
592 WL-2 (HIGHWAY) APPROPRIATED BY THE STATE OF OHIO AND DESCRIBED
IN THE JOURNAL ENTRY ON VERDICT FILED FOR RECORD JANUARY 20, 1970
AND RECORDED IN VOLUME 12585, PAGE 519 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY RECORDS
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL NO. 592 WL-1 (HIGHWAY) SITUATED IN THE
CITY OF CLEVELAND, COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA, AND STATE OF OHIO, AND BEING,
PART OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP, SECTION NO. 3 AND BOUNDED AND
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A STONE MONUMENT IN THE
CENTERLINE OF ROCKY RIVER DRIVE (70 FEET WIDE) AT ITS INTERSECTION
WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID ORIGINAL ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP SECTION
NO. 3, WHICH IS ALSO THE CONSTRUCTION BASE LINE OF BROOKPARK ROAD
(S.R. 17); THENCE NORTH 24 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 22 SECONDS EAST 175.00
FEET ALONG THE SAID CENTERLINE OF ROCKY RIVER DRIVE (70 FEET WIDE)
TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING OWNERS' NORTHEASTERLY PROPERTY CORNER;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST 230.72 FEET ALONG
THE SAID OWNERS'

NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE TO A POINT BEING 365.73 FEET RIGHT OF
STATION 443 PLUS 66.41 OF INTERSTATE 80 CENTERLINE AND, THE
PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 58
SECONDS EAST 7.00 FEET CONTINUING ALONG SAID OWNERS' NORTHERLY
PROPERTY LINE TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING OWNERS' NORTHEASTERLY
PROPERTY CORNER; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WEST
60.00 FEET ALONG SAID OWNERS' EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE TO A POINT;
THENCE NORTH 06 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 59 SECONDS WEST 60.39 FEET TO THE
PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 210 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR
LESS, EXCLUSIVE OF ALL LEGAL HIGHWAYS. TOGETHER WITH ALL RIGHTS OR
EASEMENTS OF ACCESS TO OR FROM SAID LIMITED ACCESS HIGHWAY, FROM OR
TO THE LAND OF SAID PERSONS ABUTTING UPON THAT PORTION OF SAID
LIMITED ACCESS HIGHWAY, AS SHOWN BY THE PLANS OF SAID IMPROVEMENT
HEREIN REFERRED TO. DESCRIPTION FOR THE ABOVE PARCELS IS BASED ON A
SURVEY MADE BY NORMAN H. WILKE, REGISTERED SURVEYOR NO. 598.

PARCEL NO. 592 WL-2 (HIGHWAY)

    BEGINNING AT A STONE MONUMENT IN THE CENTERLINE OF ROCKY RIVER
DRIVE (70 FEET WIDE) AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF
SAID ORIGINAL ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP SECTION 3, WHICH IS ALSO THE
CONSTRUCTION BASE LINE OF BROOKPARK ROAD (S.R. 17); THENCE SOUTH 89
DEGREES 29 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST 90.00 FEET ALONG THE SAID
NORTHERLY LINE OF BROOKPARK ROAD (100 FEET WIDE) TO A POINT; THENCE
NORTH 60 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 36 SECONDS EAST 34.48 FEET TO A POINT,
SAID POINT BEING ON OWNERS' EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE; THENCE SOUTH 00
DEGREES 30 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WEST 17.00 FEET ALONG THE SAID OWNERS'
EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTHERLY
LINE OF BROOKPARK ROAD (100 FEET WIDE); THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 30
MINUTES 02 SECONDS WEST 30.00 FEET CONTINUING ALONG SAID OWNERS'
EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING ON THE
CONSTRUCTION BASE LINE OF BROOKPARK ROAD (S.R. 17), WHICH IS ALSO
THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF ORIGINAL ROCKPORT TOWNSHIP SECTION NO. 3 AS
AFORESAID; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST 122.92
FEET ALONG THE SAID CONSTRUCTION BASE LINE OF BROOKPARK ROAD (S.R.
17) TO THE PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 255 SQUARE FEET,
MORE OR LESS EXCLUSIVE OF THE PRESENT ROAD WHICH OCCUPIES 3,644
SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. TOGETHER WITH ALL RIGHTS OR EASEMENTS OF
ACCESS TO OR FROM SAID LIMITED ACCESS HIGHWAY, FROM OR TO THE LAND
OF SAID PERSONS ABUTTING UPON THAT PORTION OF SAID LIMITED ACCESS
HIGHWAYS, AS SHOWN BY THE PLANS OF SAID IMPROVEMENT HEREIN REFERRED
TO. DESCRIPTION FOR THE ABOVE PARCEL IS BASED ON NORMAN M. WILKE,
REGISTERED SURVEYOR NO. 598.
    This property contains approximately 2.54 acres.

    Issued in Romulus, Michigan, on March 28, 2014.
John L. Mayfield, Jr.,
Manager, Detroit Airports District Office, FAA, Great Lakes Region.
[FR Doc. 2014-08111 Filed 4-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P