UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D. C. 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES MEMORANDUM Date: 11/ 02/ 05 Subject: Tridemorph Tolerance Reassessment Eligibility Decision ( TRED). Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data.

DP Number: D322129 PC Code: 121401 40 CFR § 180.372 Chemical Class: morpholine fungicide From: Gary Otakie, Chemist Reregistration Branch 4 Health Effects Division ( 7509C)

Through: Susan V. Hummel, Branch Senior Scientist Reregistration Branch 4 Health Effects Division ( 7509C)

To: Rebecca Daiss, Risk Assessor Reregistration Branch 4 Health Effects Division ( 7509C)

and Rosanna Louie, Chemical Review Manager Reregistration Branch 2 Special Review & Reregistration Division ( 7508C)

Attached is the Residue Chemistry Chapter for the Tridemorph Tolerance Reassessment Eligibility Decision ( TRED) document. This chapter was completed by Versar, Inc. under supervision of HED and has undergone secondary review/ modification in Reregistration Branch 4 for consistency with current EPA policies and add new information.

The existing residue chemistry database for tridemorph is incomplete. No data will be required if all tolerances are revoked. However, if tolerances are to remain to cover import uses, additional data are required.

cc : Chem F, Chron G. Otakie RDI: Team: 10/ 19 / 05; SVH 11/ 02/ 05 GO, Gary Otakie, Rm. 824A, CM2, 305 6991, mail code 7509C Tridemorph Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data Barcode: D322129 2 of 18 Executive Summary Tridemorph ( 2,6 dimethyl 4 tridecylmorpholine) is a fungicide registered in South America for the control of Sigatoka disease in or on bananas. Tridemorph is formulated as a emulsifiable concentrate ( EC) containing 6.26 lb ai/ A in the end use product, Calixin. The formulation is to be applied at a the rate of 0.33 0.40 lb ai/ A ( 0.375 0.450 kg ai/ ha) with 0.5 1.1 gal oil/ A ( 5 10 L oil/ ha) and sufficient water to obtain a volume of 2.7 gal/ A ( 25 L/ ha). Most applications are aerial. Depending on the degree of infection and the season, applications are to be made every 2 4 weeks. There is no established pre harvest interval ( PHI). Currently, there are no U. S. registrations for tridemorph.

A petition ( PP# 1H5281) was submitted by BASF Wyandotte Corporation to establish a tolerance of 50 ppm for the residues of tridemorph in/ on dried tea. However, the proposed tolerance was not established due to significant toxicological data gaps, teratogenicity concerns and the presence of a morpholine moiety which can easily be nitrosated by ingested dietary nitrites at acidic pH's of the stomach ( G. Ghali, 4/ 13/ 82). Nitrosamine data were later submitted and reviewed.. No detectable nitrosamines were found ( R. J. Hummel, 10/ 25/ 77)

The nature of terminal residue in bananas was considered adequately defined based on a field metabolism study using ring labeled 14C tridemorph conducted on a banana plantation in Costa Rica. Tridemorph per se is the residue of concern. As there are no uses on animal feed, the Agency concluded that the metabolism in animals was adequately understood, and the intended use will be Category 3 of Section 180.6( a) with respect to secondary residues in meat, milk, poultry and eggs.

Adequate tolerance enforcement methods are listed in PAM Volume II for the determination of tridemorph residues of concern. The analytical enforcement analytical method is a colorimetric method based on the formation of a chloroform soluble tridemorph/ methyl orange addition complex. Residues of tridemorph are confirmed through a GC/ MS procedure. The analytical method is also suitable for the determintation of 2,6 dimethylmorpholine ( DMM), a metabolite of tridemorph.

A tolerance has been established under 40 CFR § 180.372 for residues of tridemorph in or on bananas imported into the U. S. at 0.1 ppm. Three field trials were conducted in Costa Rica using aerial application of tridemorph to bagged banana crops at 0.33 lb ai/ A ( 10 21 applications). Two of the three studies resulted in no detectable residues of tridemorph (< 0.05 ppm) in either the peels or pulp of bananas. In the third study, tridemorph residues ranged from nondetectable (< 0.01 ppm) to barely detectable ( 0.01 ppm) in the pulp and from < 0.01 to 0.1 ppm in the peels. Another study was conducted in an unknown location on presumably bagged bannanas. At 0.33 lb ai/ A ( 19 21 applications over 2 years), residues of tridemorph or its metabolite DMM were not detected in either pulp or peel (< 0.05 ppm). In twelve field trials conducted in 2002 in Colunbia ( 2), Guatemala( 1), Costa Rica ( 2), Mexico ( 1), Ecuador ( 2), Honduras ( 2), and Martinique ( 2) epoxiconazle ( EC) and tridemorph ( OL) were applied to both bagged and unbagged bannans with 10 foliar applications of tridemorph at 0.338 0.518 kg ai/ ha/ application. Residues of tridemorph in the main tests were < 0.05 ppm (< LOQ) in/ on all samples of bagged whole bananas Tridemorph Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data Barcode: D322129 3 of 18 ( n= 12) harvested at 0 DAT and in all associated subsamples of pulp ( Table C. 3.3). Residues were also < 0.05 ppm in/ on 10 out of 12 peel samples, and were 0.066 and 0.085 ppm in/ on the remaining 2 samples of peel from bagged fruits. For unbagged fruit samples harvested at 0 DAT, residues of tridemorph were < 0.05 ppm in/ on 7 out of 12 samples of whole fruit; residues in/ on the remaining 5 samples were 0.054 0.628 ppm. In pulp from unbagged fruits, residues were < 0.05 ppm in/ on 11 subsamples and 0.066 ppm in one subsample. In peel from unbagged fruits, residues were < 0.05 ppm in/ on 7 subsamples and 0.052 0.907 ppm in 5 subsamples.

Average tridemorph resides were 0.114 and 0.025 ppm in/ on unbagged and bagged samples of whole bananas ( RAC), respectively, and 0.028 and 0.025 ppm in pulp samples from unbagged and bagged fruits.

For tridemorph, residue data on unbagged whole fruit and peel samples from one test indicated that residues of tridemorph generally declined at longer post treatment intervals. In this test, maximum whole fruit residues occurred at 5 DAT ( 0.06 ppm) and then declined to < 0.05 ppm by 7 DAT. Maximum peel residues occurred at 3 DAT ( 0.093 ppm) and then declined to < 0.05 ppm by 10 DAT.

For tridemorph the highest residues were clearly associated with the two field trials conducted in Martinique, which used applications in 100% spray oil to the underside of the canopy. For these two tests, residues of tridemorph were 0.066 0.085 ppm in/ on bagged fruits and 0.638 0.907 ppm in/ on unbagged fruits.

While in general the residue chemistry requirements for import tolerances are similar to those for any other tolerance issued by the NAFTA countries, the NAFTA guidance document details a procedure for determining the minimum number and location of field trials, based on the maximum consumption of the commodity as a percentage of the U. S., Canadian, or Mexican diet, and the maximum relative amount imported into the U. S., Canada, or Mexico from outside of North America. Based on this new guidance, for import tolerances in the U. S. for bananas, 12 field trials are required. The 12 field trials should be split between Columbia ( 2), Ecuador ( 3), Honduras ( 2), and Guatemala ( 2).

It should be noted that the crop field trials were conducted prior to the issuance of a guidance document by NAFTA countries on the data requirements for import tolerances. Although the distribution of the banana field trials does not exactly match the distribution recommended by the Agency, the 12 field trails conducted at 1x during 2002 in Columbia ( 2 tests), Guatemala ( 1 test), Costa Rica ( 2 tests), Mexico ( 1 test), Ecuador ( 2 tests), Honduras ( 2 tests), and Martinique ( 2 tests) are adequate.

Regulatory Recommendations and Residue Chemistry Deficiencies A tolerance has been established under 40 CFR § 180.372 for the residues of tridemorph in or on bananas imported into the U. S. at 0.1 ppm. Based on new residue data, the established tolerance of 0.1 ppm in/ on banana must be increased to 1.0 ppm. HED supports a revised import tolerance of 1.0 ppm in/ on banana, provided that the following deficiencies and data gaps are resolved: Tridemorph Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data Barcode: D322129 4 of 18 ° There was no information in the review documents regarding submittal of data for FDA multiresidue methods by the petitioner. Tridemorph was not listed in the FDA PESTDATA database dated 11/ 01 ( PAM Volume I, Appendix I). Data are required for FDA multiresidue methods.

° Acceptable frozen storage stability data for tridemorph in bananas for a one year period must be submitted.

° Product Chemistry data must be provided.

A human health risk assessment is forthcoming.

Background The nomenclature of tridemorph is listed in Table 1, the physicochemical properties of tridemorph are listed in Table 2, and the chemical names and structures of tridemorph and metabolites are listed in Table 3. Tridemorph Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data Barcode: D322129 5 of 18 TABLE 1. Tridemorph Nomenclature Compound Chemical Structure Common name Tridemorph Trade Name Calixin Company experimental name BASF 2203F IUPAC name 2,6 dimethyl 4 tridecylmorpholine CAS name CAS: 2,6 dimethyl 4 tridecylmorpholine CAS # 24602 86 6 Current Food/ Feed Site Registration No U. S. registrations. Registered for use in/ on bananas in South America.

TABLE 2. Physicochemical Properties of the Technical Grade Tridemorph Parameter Value Reference Melting point/ range NA pH NA Density NA Water solubility ( 20 /

C) 11.7 mg/ L EEE Branch Review, R. Ney, 10/ 20/ 75, 00067847.

Solvent solubility ( mg/ L at20 /

C) Miscible with ordinary organic solvents at any rate. EEE Branch Review, R. Ney, 10/ 20/ 75,00067847.

Vapour pressure ( mPa) at 20 /

C 6.4 Dissociation constant ( pKa) NA Octanol/ water partition coefficient Log( KOW) NA UV/ visible absorption spectrum NA Tridemorph Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data Barcode: D322129 6 of 18 O NH C H 3 CH 3 TABLE 3. Chemical Names and Structures of Tridemorph and Metabolites Company Name Chemical Name Structure Tridemorph 2,6 dimethyl 4 tridecylmorpholine DMM 2,6 dimethylmorpholine 860.1200 Directions for Use Product List Currently, there are no U. S. registrations for tridemorph. However, tridemorph, contained in the end use product, Calixin, is a emulsifiable concentrate containing 6.26 lb ai/ A registered for use on bananas in South America ( N. Dodd, 9/ 8/ 83). According to a 6/ 24/ 76 EPA memo from R. J. Hummel, tridemorph is registered for use in Columbia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, and Guatemala. It is also proposed for use in Honduras, but no registration is required for this country. Calixin is manufactured by BASF Corporation.

Use Patterns A summary of the direction for the use of tridemorph is presented in Table 4. For control of Sigatoka disease in bananas, tridemorph is to be applied at a the rate of 0.33 0.40 lb ai/ A with 0.5 1.1 gal oil/ A ( 5 10 L oil/ ha) and sufficient water to obtain a volume of 2.7 gal/ A ( 25 L/ ha). Most applications are aerial. Depending on the degree of infection and the season, applications are to be made every 2 4 weeks. There is no established PHI ( R. J. Hummel, 2/ 25/ 76).

A tabular summary of the chemistry science assessments is presented in Table 5. The conclusions listed in Table 5 regarding the reregistration eligibility of tridemorph food/ feed uses are based on the use patterns registered by the producer. When end use product data call in's ( DCIs) are developed ( e. g., at issuance of the RED), the Registration Division ( RD) should require that all end use product labels ( e. g., MAI labels, SLNs, and products subject to the generic data exemption) be amended such that they are consistent with the basic producer labels. Tridemorph Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data Barcode: D322129 7 of 18 Tridemorph Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data Barcode: D322129 8 of 18 TABLE 4. Summary of Directions for Use of Tridemorph1 Application Timing ° Type ° Equipment Formulation Applic. Rate ( lb ai/ A) Max. No. Applic. per Season Max. Seasonal Applic. Rate ( lb ai/ A) PHI ( days) Use Directions and Limitations Bananas Depending on the degree of infection and the season, applications are to be made every 2 4 weeks ° Aerial ° Aircraft Calixin EC 0.33 0.40 lb ai/ A NR NR NR Do not apply Calixin to bananas grown for the U. S. market unless they are to be bagged on the plant according to usual and common practice.

Ground foliar Calixin 86 ( OL) 0.37 0.39 lb/ ai/ A ( 430 g ai/ ha/ ap plication ) 10 with RTI of 12 15 days 4.0 lb ai/ A 0 None ( no restriction for use on unbagged bananas)

1 Currently, there are no U. S. registrations for tridemorph. A label for Calixin, registered for use in South America, was not available. Data contained in this table were compiled from Agency memos ( R. J. Hummel, 2/ 25/ 76 and R. J. Hummel, 6/ 24/ 76) A proposed label submitted for # 7E4885, epoxiconazole on bananas uses a duel ai product which includes tridemorph ( A. Acierto, xx/ xx/ 05, G. Otakie, 11/ 02/ 05).

TABLE 5. Residue Chemistry Science Assessment for Reregistration of Tridemorph GLN Data Requirements Current Tolerances ( ppm) [ § 180.372] Additional Data Needed? MRID Nos.

860.1200: Directions for Use N/ A = Not Applicable No See Table 4.

860.1300: Nature of the Residue  Plants  Bananas N/ A No 001513371 860.1300: Nature of the Residue  Animals N/ A No 001513372 860.1340: Residue Analytical Method  Plant Commodities N/ A No 000407113, 46574902, 46574903  Animal Commodities N/ A No None 860.1360: Multiresidue Method N/ A Yes4 None 860.1380: Storage Stability Data Tridemorph Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data Barcode: D322129 TABLE 5. Residue Chemistry Science Assessment for Reregistration of Tridemorph GLN Data Requirements Current Tolerances ( ppm) [ § 180.372] Additional Data Needed? MRID Nos.

9 of 18  Plant Commodities N/ A Yes5 None  Animal Commodities N/ A No None 860.1400: Magnitude of the Residue  Water, Fish, and Irrigated Crops N/ A No None 860.1460: Magnitude of the Residue  Food Handling N/ A No None 860.1480: Magnitude of the Residue  Meat, Milk, Poultry, Eggs N/ A No 001513376 860.1500: Crop Field Trials  Bananas 0.1 Yes5 1353818, 464821017 860.1520: Processed Food/ Feed  Tea N/ A No 00067848 860.1650: Submittal of Analytical Reference Standards N/ A No9 None 860.1850: Confined Accumulation in Rotational Crops N/ A No None 860.1900: Field Accumulation in Rotational Crops N/ A No None 1 The nature of residue in plants was reviewed in R. J. Hummel, 2/ 25/ 76 and R. J. Hummel, 10/ 25/ 77. 2 The nature of residue in animals was reviewed in R. J. Hummel, 2/ 25/ 76. 3 The MRID number was found in the MRID bibliography for tridemorph. No MRID or accession numbers were provided in the EPA reviews of the analytical methodologies ( R. J. Hummel, 6/ 24/ 76). 4 Multiresidue testing data have not been submitted. Tridemorph is not listed in Pestrak 5 Storage stability data were not provided. The banana field trial residue data are acceptable pending submission of supporting storage stability data for tridemorph residues in frozen bananas for one year. 6 Livestock feeding studies were reviewed in R. J. Hummel, 2/ 25/ 76. 7 Based on this new guidance, for import tolerances in the U. S. for bananas, 12 field trials are required. Only four field trials had been submitted; therefore, additional data were required. In acccordance with import tolerance guidance, 12 field trials should be split between Columbia ( 2), Ecuador ( 3), Honduras ( 2), and Guatemala ( 2). However, these new data adequately represents the major banana producing countries exporting to the US. 8 The MRID number was found in the MRID bibliogrpahy for tridemorph. No MRID or accession numbers were provided in the EPA reviews of the crop field trials ( in R. J. Hummel, 2/ 25/ 76 and R. J. Hummel, 10/ 25/ 77). 9 Replenish standards as requested by the repository, including all residues of concern, needed by the enforcement method.

860.1300 Nature of the Residue  Plants To determine whether tridemorph is systemic, ring labeled 14C tridemorph was applied to the leaves of barley, cucumbers and bananas. Plants were sampled at various intervals and analyzed autoradiometrically. In barley and cucumbers, tridemorph was absorbed and translocated rapidly. In bananas, translocation was slow as a result of slow penetration of the leaf surface ( R. J. Hummel, 2/ 25/ 76).

A banana translocation study was also carried out in Costa Rica. Banana leaves were treated with either unlabeled or ring labeled 14C tridemorph. At appropriate intervals, leaves were analyzed either by the proposed analytical method or by radiometric techniques to determine both the speed Tridemorph Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data Barcode: D322129 10 of 18 of leaf penetration and translocation. Tridemorph was found to rapidly penetrate into leaves and remain at levels > 2 ppm for at least 4 weeks after treatment. Partial treatment of leaves indicated that translocation to untreated portions of the leaves was relatively slow. The petitioner postulates that because of this slow rate of translocation, no residues in fruit would result from translocation of residues from the treated leaves ( R. J. Hummel, 2/ 25/ 76).

Additionally, a field metabolism study using ring labeled 14C tridemorph was conducted on a banana plantation in Costa Rica. Banana plants which contained fruit that was to be harvested in approximately 1 month were treated with 14C tridemorph five times at weekly intervals. Applications were made by painting the upper three leaves and the entire fruiting stem with a formulation consisting of 300 mg 14C tridemorph, 20 mg spray oil, 0.25 mg surfactant and approximately 300 mL water. Application rates were 10 mg/ m2 14C tridemorph. After the first two applications, the stem was covered with a polyethylene bag in order to simulate commercial practice. Shortly after the last application, the treated leaves and fruiting stems were harvested; the fruit was essentially mature and at a stage typical of commercial harvest. Leaves, peels, and pulp were analyzed for total activity by radiometric techniques. Total radioactivity ( expressed as tridemorph) ranged from 0.02 0.04 ppm in pulp, from 0.15 0.31 ppm in peel and from 7 33 ppm in leaves. The residues in leaves and peels were characterized by radiometric TLC and confirmed by GC/ MS. Of the extractable activity, 87% of the residues in leaves partitioned into the organic phase. The major component of this phase was found to be the parent compound with a small amount of polar material. The majority of the aqueous soluble activity was found to be 2,6 dimethyl morpholine ( DMM). The residues in the peel was also found to be primarily tridemorph, per se, with traces of 2,6 dimethyl morpholine found in the aqueous phase. No attempt was made to characterize the trace amount of residue ( 0.02  0.04 ppm) in the pulp ( R. J. Hummel, 2/ 25/ 76); however, HED concluded that there was no need to characterize the total activity equivalent to 0.02 0.04 ppm in banana pulp because possible residues of the metabolite 2,6 dimethylmorpholine in banana pulp at these levels would not be of toxicological concern ( R. D. Coberly, personal communication, 5/ 11/ 76).

Because toxicological studies have indicated that morpholine is a weak carcinogen and the concern that secondary amines and nitrites in acid situations form dinitrosamines, nitrosamine data were required for tridemorph. Therefore, residue data for N nitroso 2,6 dimethyl morpholine ( NDMM) on tridemorph treated bananas and numerous other studies related to nitrosation of DMM were submitted.. The residue data indicated that no detectable residues of either the plant metabolite DMM or NDMM were found in tridemorph treated bananas. Also, residues of unsubtituted morphaline are not expected to be present in tridemorph treated bananas or to be a rat metabolite of tridemorph ( R. J. Hummel, 10/ 25/ 77).

The Toxicology Branch determined the nature of terminal residue in bananas is considered adequately defined; tridemorph per se is the residue of concern. Tridemorph Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data Barcode: D322129 11 of 18 860.1300 Nature of the Residue  Livestock A balance study was submitted in which rats were given a single oral dose of 14C tridemorph at a rate equivalent to 20 mg/ kg and urine, feces and expired air were monitored for radioactivity. The rats were sacrificed after 5 days and the carcasses analyzed for residual activity. Separate experiments were conducted in which bile and carcasses were monitored for activity at various intervals after dosing. Attempts were made to characterize the activity in urine, feces and bile by TLC and MS.

Approximately 90% of the ingested activity was eliminated in the excreta within 5 days of dosing. Urine contained about 43%, feces about 47%, an additional 1.5% was eliminated as 14CO 2 and 3.5% was retained in the carcass. At least four metabolites of tridemorph were detected in urine and two in bile and fecal extracts. One of these was tentatively identified as the N oxide of 2,6 dimethylmorpholine. Only negligible amounts of tridemorph, per se, were eliminated; the plant metabolite 2,6 dimethyl morpholine could not be detected. Incubation of extracts with Bglucuronidase did not affect the pattern of metabolites on TLC ( R. J. Hummel, 2/ 25/ 76).

As there are no tolerances for animal feed established, no additional livestock metabolism data are needed.

860.1340 Residue Analytical Methods The enforcement analytical method is a colorimetric method based on the formation of a chloroform soluble tridemorph/ methyl orange addition complex. HED concluded that the original colorimetric method submitted was not adequate without the submittal of data demonstrating that residues of tridemorph can be determined in the presence of all other pesticides with tolerances for bannanas or a confirmatory method. In response, the petitioner submitted both the results of a specificity study and a GC/ MS confirmatory method. HED concluded that the method is adequate to enforce a tolerance of 0.1 ppm when coupled with the GC/ MS confirmatory procedure. In addition to modifying the procedure with the addition of the confirmatory method, the petitioner revised the original method so that is also capable of determining residue of DMM. In the revised method, inital extraction is performed with 50% aqueous acetone and then residues are partitioned between chloroform and water. Tridemorph is organo soluble and partitions into the chloroform layer; 2,6 dimethylmorpholine ( DMM) is water soluble and partitions into the aqueous phase. Tridemorph residues are extracted into hexane and cleaned up by alumina column chromatography. The eluate is taken up in water and a buffer solution, methyl orange and chloroform are added. The chloroform layer is drawn off with great care taken to avoid contamination with the aqueous phase. The tridemorph/ methyl orange addition complex is cleaved by extraction with 1N HCl. The released methyl orange is extracted into the aqueous acid phase and determined colorimetrically at 510 nm. In the procedure for determining DMM, residues are extracted from the aqueous phase by repetitive extraction with chloroform, cleanedup by liquid/ liquid partitioning and alumina column chromatography, and reacted with 4 bromobenzoyl chloride. The resulting derivative, N 4' bromobenzoyl 2,6 dimethylmorpholine, is cleaned up by silica gel column chromatography and determined by ECGC. Under the GLC conditions, separate peaks for cis and trans isomers are observed ( R. J. Hummel, 6/ 24/ 76). Tridemorph Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data Barcode: D322129 12 of 18 The petitioner reported recoveries of 80 90% from grain, straw, bananas and cucumbers fortified with tridemorph at levels of 0.05 1 ppm. The limit of detection was 0.05 ppm ( as determined by the petitioner) and 0.01 ppm ( as determined by Delmonte Corporation who also used this method on bananas). An EPA tryout of this method completed on whole bananas and banana pulp at tridemorph fortification levels of 0.1 and 0.05 ppm, respectively, showed corrected recoveries of 80 90%. Based on residues of 0.04 to 0.05 ppm detected in the blanks, the indicated sensitivity of the method is 0.1 ppm ( K. T. Zee, 1/ 8/ 76).

This method was determined to be adequate to enforce tolerances for combined residues of tridemorph and its metabolite DMM.

A LC/ MS/ MS method ( BASF Method Number 529/ 0) was used to determine residues of tridemorph in the banana crop field trials ( MRID 46482101). A brief description of the method follows.

Residues of tridemorph are extracted by initially homogenizing the sample with MeOH: water: 2N HCl ( 80/ 15/ 5, v/ v/ v). An equal volume of water is then added and the sample is further homogenized. After centrifuging, residues in the extract are partitioned into dichloromethane and concentrated to dryness. Residues are then redissolved in water/ acetonitrile ( 50/ 50, v/ v) and analyzed by HPLC with MS/ MS detection. The HPLC system uses a reverse phase C 18 column with a mobile phase gradient of water to acetonitrile, each containing 0.1% formic acid. The retention time for tridemorph is

8.2 min, and residues were detected and quantified by monitoring the m/ z 2986130 and 2986116 transitions. The validated method LOQ is 0.05 ppm for residues of tridemorph in/ on bananas. The LOD was not reported.

The method was validated concurrently with the analysis of the field trial samples using control samples of whole fruit, pulp, and peel fortified with tridemorph at 0.05 and 0.50 ppm.

860.1360 Multiresidue Methods Tridemorph is not listed in the FDA PESTDATA database dated 11/ 01 ( PAM Volume I, Appendix I). FDA multiresidue data are required.

860.1380 Storage Stability Storage stability data for tridemorph have not been submitted. These data are required.

860.1400 Water, Fish, and Irrigated Crops Tridemorph is not intended for direct use on water and aquatic food and feed crops; therefore, no residue chemistry data are required under this guideline topic.

860.1460 Food Handling Tridemorph is not intended for use in food handling establishments; therefore, no residue Tridemorph Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data Barcode: D322129 13 of 18 chemistry data are required under this guideline topic.

860.1480 Meat, Milk, Poultry, and Eggs Two cattle feeding studies were submitted. In the first study, two dairy cows were fed a daily dose of 0.5 g tridemorph for 14 days. The daily dose was then increased to 1 g for an additional 14 days and finally to 1.5 g for the concluding 14 days of the study. Samples of each milking were analyzed for tridemorph residues using a method with a sensitivity of 0.05 ppm. No detectable residues were found in milk from the 0.5 g feeding level. At the higher feeding levels, milk residues ranged from 0.05 0.4 ppm. Residues in milk declined to nondetectable levels after withdrawal periods of 5 10 days.

In the second study, three groups of four lactating dairy cows each were fed 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 g/ day of tridemorph for 15 16 days. Milk from the highest dose level was sampled daily and milk from the intermediate level was sampled on feeding days 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, and 15. The animals were not slaughtered. Tridemorph residues in milk reached a plateau after 7 days of feeding. Maximum residues from the 1.0 g/ day feeding level were 0.13 ppm. Residues declined slowly after tridemorph was withdrawn from the diet and reached nondetectable levels after 7 days. The feeding at 0.5 g/ day resulted in trace residues of about 0.01 ppm in milk. Milk from the 0.1 g/ day feeding level was not analyzed ( R. J. Hummel, 2/ 25/ 76).

As there are no tolerances for livestock feed the proposed use will be Category 3 of Section 180.6( a) with respect to secondary residues in meat, milk, poultry and eggs.

860.1500 Crop Field Trials Residue data were submitted from three plantations in Costa Rica. In one study, bananas were sampled from 1 hour to 20 days after the last of 10 to 20 applications of tridemorph at a rate of 0.33 lb ai/ A ( 0.83x maximum proposed rate). In a second study, bananas were sampled 1 to 20 days after the last of 11 to 19 applications of tridemorph at the maximum proposed rate. The samples were shipped to Germany, four by air and the remainder by sea, and analyzed immediately upon arrival. The time from the last application to analysis varied from 5 to 50 days. No detectable residues of tridemorph (< 0.05 ppm) were found in either the peels or pulp. In both of these studies, fruit were protected by bagging in polyethylene ( R. J. Hummel, 2/ 25/ 76).

In the third study, bananas were sampled 4 to 18 days after the last of 11 to 21 treatments of tridemorph at 0.83x the maximum proposed rate and shipped by air to the U. S. for analysis. Tridemorph residues ranged from nondetectable (< 0.01 ppm) to 0.01 ppm in the pulp and from < 0.01 to 0.1 ppm in the peels. It was not specified whether the bananas in this study were protected with polyethylene bags ( R. J. Hummel, 2/ 25/ 76). The petitioner submitted clarification that the bananas were, in fact, protected with polyethylene bags and agreed to the following label restriction: " Do not apply Calixin to bananas grown for the U. S. market unless they are to be bagged on the plant according to usual and common practice" ( R. J. Hummel, 6/ 24/ 76).

Additional residue data, presumably for bagged bananas, were subsequently subsquently submitted and reviewed in the 6/ 24/ 76 EPA memo from R. J. Hummel. Bananas were harvested Tridemorph Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data Barcode: D322129 14 of 18 from plants which had received 19 21 application of tridemorph at the maximum proposed rate over a 2 year period. Samples were shipped to Germany for analysis ( using the revised method). No detectable residues (< 0.05 ppm) of tridemorph or DMM were found in either peel or pulp. The location of the trial was not reported in the EPA memo.

At the time the import tolerance for tridemorph on bananas was established, HED provided caseby case advice on adapting data requirements for field trials to import situations. Since then, guidance on data requirements for import tolerance petitions has been issued. In the Federal Register of June 1, 2000 ( 65 FR 35069) ( FRL 6559 30), EPA provided detailed guidance on applying current U. S. data requirements for the establishment or continuance of tolerances for pesticide residues in or on imported foods. In addition, in 2003, Canada, Mexico and the United States jointly issued a guidance document on the data requirements needed to meet the North American Free Trade Agreement ( NAFTA) standards for the establishment of pesticide import tolerances or maximum residue levels in the NAFTA countries ( 68 FR 18638) ( FRL 7299 1). The NAFTA guidance document is consistent with the 2000 U. S. guidance. In general, the residue chemistry requirements for import tolerances listed in the NAFTA guidance document are similar to those for any other tolerance issued by the NAFTA countries. However, the NAFTA guidance document details a procedure for determining the minimum number and location of field trials, based on the maximum consumption of the commodity as a percentage of the U. S., Canadian, or Mexican diet, and the maximum relative amount imported into the U. S., Canada, or Mexico from outside of North America. The NAFTA guidance document also indicates that field trials generally will need to be conducted in all countries whose exports comprise at least 5% of the total amount of a specific commodity imported into any of the North American countries where a tolerance is being sought. Based on this new guidance, for import tolerances in the U. S. for bananas, 12 field trials are required. The 12 field trials should be split between Columbia ( 2), Ecuador ( 3), Honduras ( 2), and Guatemala ( 2).

In 12 field trials ( MRID 46482101) conducted during 2002 in Columbia ( 2 tests), Guatemala ( 1 test), Costa Rica ( 2 tests), Mexico ( 1 test), Ecuador ( 2 tests), Honduras ( 2 tests), and Martinique ( 2 tests), epoxiconazole ( EC) and tridemorph ( OL) were applied to bananas as multiple foliar applications. At each test site, a single plot of bananas, containing both bagged and unbagged fruit clusters, received 10 foliar applications of tridemorph ( 860 g/ L OL) at 0.338 0.518 kg ai/ ha/ application for a total of 4.16 4.46 kg ai/ ha/ season. Applications were made beginning

4 5 months prior to harvest, at retreatment intervals ( RTIs) of 9 14 days, except in one test in Costa Rica ( RTI = 13 39 days). All applications were made using ground equipment; however, except in Martinique, the ground applications were made above the plant canopy to simulate aerial application. In Martinique, the ground applications were made to the underside of the canopy, as is typical for this region. All applications were made in 50 100% spray oil, as per local practices, along with an emulsifier if necessary. The final six applications in each test included epoxiconazole ( 75 g/ L EC) in the tank mix at a rate of 0.096 0.106 kg ai/ ha/ application for a total of 0.59 0.62 kg ai/ ha/ season. The initial sprays including epoxiconazole were made

70 days prior to harvest.

A single control and treated sample of bagged and unbagged whole fruits were collected from each test and stored at ambient temperatures for up to 7 days prior to being placed in frozen storage. Additional samples were collected from two sites ( Costa Rica and Equador) at 3, 5, 7, Tridemorph Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data Barcode: D322129 15 of 18 and 10 DAT to examine residue decline. Subsamples of banana peel and pulp were also obtained from each sample. Samples were stored frozen from collection to analysis for up to 12 months, an interval supported by available stability data.

Residues of tridemorph in the main tests were < 0.05 ppm (< LOQ) in/ on all samples of bagged whole bananas ( n= 12) harvested at 0 DAT and in all associated subsamples of pulp. For unbagged fruit samples harvested at 0 DAT, residues of tridemorph were < 0.05 ppm in/ on 7 out of 12 samples of whole fruit; residues in/ on the remaining 5 samples were 0.054 0.628 ppm. In pulp from unbagged fruits, residues were < 0.05 ppm in/ on 11 subsamples and 0.066 ppm in one subsample. Average tridemorph resides were 0.114 and 0.025 ppm in/ on unbagged and bagged samples of whole bananas ( RAC), respectively, and 0.028 and 0.025 ppm in pulp samples from unbagged and bagged fruits.

The local cultural practices had a substantial impact on residue levels as residues of tridemorph were highest in samples from the two field trials conducted in Martinique, which used applications in 100% spray oil to the underside of the canopy. For these two tests, residues of tridemorph were 0.066 0.085 ppm in/ on bagged fruits and 0.638 0.907 ppm in/ on unbagged fruits.

It should be noted that the crop field trials were conducted prior to the issuance of a guidance document by NAFTA countries on the data requirements for import tolerances. Although the distribution of the banana field trials does not exactly match the distribution recommended by the Agency, the 12 field trails conducted at 1x during 2002 in Columbia ( 2 tests), Guatemala ( 1 test), Costa Rica ( 2 tests), Mexico ( 1 test), Ecuador ( 2 tests), Honduras ( 2 tests), and Martinique ( 2 tests) are adequate.

Based on these data, the established tolerance of 0.1 ppm in/ on banana must be increased to 1.0 ppm.

860.1520 Processed Food and Feed There are no processed commodities associated with bananas. Therefore, no residue chemistry data are required under this guideline topic.

860.1650 Submittal of Analytical Reference Standards As of 8/ 31/ 04, an analytical reference standard for tridemorph is available at the EPA National Pesticide Standards Repository.

860.1850 Confined Accumulation in Rotational Crops Rotational crop studies are not required for uses of pesticides on bananas ( 40 CFR 180.41).

860.1900 Field Accumulation in Rotational Crops Rotational crop studies are not required for uses of pesticides on bananas ( 40 CFR 180.41). Tridemorph Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data Barcode: D322129 16 of 18 TOLERANCE REASSESSMENT SUMMARY Tolerance Reassessment for Tridemorph The tolerance for residues of tridemorph in/ on plant commodities is expressed in terms of residues of tridemorph per se ( 2,6 dimethyl 4 tridecylmorpholine). A summary of the tridemorph tolerance reassessment for bananas is presented in Table 6.

Tolerances Listed Under 40 CFR § 180.372:

A tolerance has been established under 40 CFR § 180.372 for residues of tridemorph in or on bananas imported into the U. S at 0.1 ppm. New residue data indicates the established tolerance must be increased to 1.0 ppm. Additionally, storage stability and multiresidue method data are required.

Since the tolerance for tridemorph is an import tolerance, it should be footnoted to indicate that there are no U. S. registrations for tridemorph.

TABLE 6. Tolerance Summary for Tridemorph 40 CFR § 180.372 Commodity Established/ Proposed Tolerance ( ppm) Recommended Tolerance ( ppm) 1 Comments /( correct commodity definition)

Bananas 0.1 ( established) 1.0 The tolerance should be footnoted to indicate that there are no U. S. registrations associated with tridemorph./ banana 1 The new NAFTA guidance requires 12 field trial studies for establishing tolerances for bananas. The current tolerance was determined using only 4 studies. The established tolerance must be increased based on newly submitted residue data.

Codex/ International Harmonization There are no Codex maximum residue limits ( MRLs) for tridemorph listed in the FAOSTAT database; therefore, no questions of compatibility with U. S. tolerances exist.

BIBLIOGRAPHY NAFTA Guidance Document on Data Requirements for Tolerances on Imported Commodities. April 2003. http:// yosemite. epa. gov/ opp/ naftatwg. nsf/ 0/ ff1cbe90259cd6b985256d0900705b7e/$ FILE/ NAFT A% 20Import% 20Tolerances% 20Document. PDF 65 FR 35069. Pesticides; Guidance on Pesticide Import Tolerances and Residue Data for Imported Food; Request for Comment. June 1, 2000 ( Volume 65, Number 106). ( http:// www. epa. gov/ fedrgstr/ EPA PEST/ 2000/ June/ Day 01/ p13708. htm) Tridemorph Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data Barcode: D322129 17 of 18 68 FR 18638. Pesticides; North American Free Trade Agreement Guidance Document on Requirements for Tolerances on Imported Commodities; Notice of Availability. April 16, 2003 ( Volume 68, Number 73). ( http:// www. epa. gov/ fedrgstr/ EPA PEST/ 2003/ April/ Day 16/ p9338. htm)

Study Citations 40711 Beutel, P.; Otto, S. ( 1976) A Study Regarding the Formation of N Nitroso 2,6 dimethylmorpholine: Report No. 1362. Includes method entitled: Analysis method for the determination of N Nitroso DMM in bananas. ( Unpublished study including published data, received Aug 30, 1977 under 6E1670; submitted by BASF Wyandotte Corp., Wyandotte, Mich.; CDL: 096339 A)

67847 BASF India, Limited ( 19??) ^( R) ICalixin. Bombay, India: BASF. ( Technical information, plant protection; also~ In~ unpublished submission received Nov 12, 1980 under 1H5281; submitted by BASF Wyandotte Corp., Parsippany, N. J.; CDL: 243711 A)

135381 BASF Wyandotte Chemical Corp. ( 1975) Residue Studies of Tridemorph and Its Metabolite 2,6 Dimethylmorpholine in Peel and Pulp of Calixin Treated Bananas. ( Compilation; unpublished study received Apr 21, 1976 under 6E1670; CDL: 098094 A)

151337 BASF AG Research Station. ( 1975) ( Metabolism amd Residue Methods and Analysis for Tridemorph Fungicide). Unpublished compila tion. 185 p.

46482101 Johnston, R. ( 2004) Magnitude of Tridemorph and Epoxiconazole Residues in bananas for Import Tolerance. Project N: 2003/ 5000383, 104861, 2002101. Unpublished study prepared by BASF Agro Research and University od Costa Rica and Agros Consultoria Agricola. 169 p.

46574902 Kerl, W. ( 2003) Method for the Determination of Tridemorph ( Reg. No. 16291) and Epoxiconazole ( Reg. No. 205259) in Plant Matrices. Project Number: 2004/ 1000757, 529/ 0. Unpublished study prepared by BASF Ag Research Station ( Basf Aktieng). 21 p.

46574903 Schulz, H. ( 2003) Determination of Tridemorph ( Reg. No. 16291) and Epoxiconazole ( Reg. No. 205259) in Bananas  Independent Laboratory Validation of the BASF Method 529/ 0: Final Report. Project Number: 104855, IF/ 03/ 00079588, 2003/ 1001281. Unpublished study prepared by Institut Fresenius Chemische und Biologische. 32 p. Tridemorph Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data Barcode: D322129 18 of 18 Agency Memoranda Citations.

Date DP Barcode CB No. ID Number From To MRID Nos. Subject 10/ 20/ 75       R. Ney     EEE Branch Review on tridemorph.

1/ 8/ 76     PP# 6E1670 K. T. Zee J. Cummings   PP# 6E1670. Tridemorph method trial.

2/ 25/ 76     PP# 6E1670 R. J. Hummel J. Lee and Toxicology Branch   PP# 6E1670. Tridemorph on bananas.

Evaluation of Analytical Methods and Residue Data.

* 5/ 11/ 76 R. D. Coberly Personal Communication 6/ 24/ 76     PP# 6E1670 R. J. Hummel J. Lee and Toxicology Branch   PP# 6E1670. Tridemorph on bananas.

Amendment of 4/ 20/ 76.

10/ 25/ 77 PP# 6E1670 R. J. Hummel J. Lee and Toxicology Branch   Tridemorph on bananas. Amendment of 8/ 30/ 77.

10/ 20/ 78 PP# 6E1670/

R162 U. S. EPA Office of Pesticide Programs Part 180 Tolerances and Exemptions from Tolerances for Pesticide Chemicals in or on Raw Agricultural Commodities: 2,  Dimethyl 4

Tridecylmorpholine ( Final Rule)

4/ 13/ 82     PP# 1H5281 G. Ghali H. Jacoby   Tridemorph on dried tea. PP# 1H5281 ( Acc. No. 243711, Caswell No. 386).

9/ 8/ 83     ID# 7969 Q N. Dodd H. Jacoby   ID# 7969 Q. Amended registration for tridemorph on bananas.

11/ 2/ 05 D302111, D302111A G. Otakie HED 46482101, 46574902,

46574903 Tridemorph residues in/ on bananas for import tolerance and analytical method and ILV.

xx/ xx/ 05 D267877,

D318715 A. Acierto HED 46482101, 46574902,

46574903 PP# 7E4885 Epoxiconazole residues in/ on bananas and analytical method and ILV.

* The personal communication was documented in the EPA memo from R. J. Hummel dated 6/ 24/ 76.


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 201 (Thursday, October 19, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48615-48618]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22503]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 31160; Amdt. No. 3770]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule amends, suspends, or removes Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports. These
regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or revised
criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National Airspace
System, such as the commissioning of new navigational facilities,
adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements. These
changes are designed to provide for the safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective October 19, 2017. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of October 19, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matter incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:

For Examination

    1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Ops-M30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., West Bldg., Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
    2. The FAA Air Traffic Organization Service Area in which the
affected airport is located;
    3. The office of Aeronautical Navigation Products, 6500 South
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
    For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call
202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

Availability

    All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available online free
of charge. Visit the National Flight Data Center online at nfdc.faa.gov
to register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP
copies may be obtained from the FAA Air Traffic Organization Service
Area in which the affected airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Nichols, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS-420), Flight Technologies and Procedures
Division, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration,
Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082 Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, part 97 (14 CFR part 97) by amending the referenced SIAPs.
The complete regulatory description of each SIAP is listed on the
appropriate FAA Form 8260, as modified by the National Flight Data
Center (NFDC)/Permanent Notice to Airmen (P-NOTAM), and is incorporated
by reference under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 CFR 97.20.
The large number of SIAPs, their complex nature, and the need for a
special format make their verbatim publication in the Federal Register
expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use the regulatory
text of the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic depiction on charts
printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. Thus, the advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP contained on FAA form documents is
unnecessary.
    This amendment provides the affected CFR sections, and specifies
the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs with their applicable effective
dates. This amendment also identifies the airport and its location, the
procedure and the amendment number.

Availability and Summary of Material Incorporated by Reference

    The material incorporated by reference is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section.
    The material incorporated by reference describes SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs as identified in the amendatory language for part 97
of this final rule.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP as amended in the
transmittal. For safety and timeliness of change considerations, this
amendment incorporates only specific changes

contained for each SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP as modified by FDC
permanent NOTAMs.
    The SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, as modified by FDC
permanent NOTAM, and contained in this amendment are based on the
criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for Terminal Instrument
Procedures (TERPS). In developing these changes to SIAPs and Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied only to specific
conditions existing at the affected airports. All SIAP amendments in
this rule have been previously issued by the FAA in a FDC NOTAM as an
emergency action of immediate flight safety relating directly to
published aeronautical charts.
    The circumstances that created the need for these SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP amendments require making them effective in less than
30 days.
    Because of the close and immediate relationship between these
SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find
that notice and public procedure under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are
impracticable and contrary to the public interest and, where
applicable, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d), good cause exists for making these
SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air traffic control, Airports, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 6, 2017.
John S. Duncan,
Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal regulations, part 97, (14 CFR part 97), is amended by
amending Standard Instrument Approach Procedures and Takeoff Minimums
and ODPs, effective at 0901 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113,
40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:
    By amending: Sec.  97.23 VOR, VOR/DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME or
TACAN; Sec.  97.25 LOC, LOC/DME, LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME; Sec.
97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; Sec.  97.29 ILS, ILS/DME, MLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV;
Sec.  97.31 RADAR SIAPs; Sec.  97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and Sec.  97.35 COPTER
SIAPs, Identified as follows:

* * * Effective Upon Publication

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      AIRAC date           State              City                 Airport          FDC No.      FDC date                      Subject
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9-Nov-17.............  OH             Cleveland...........  Cleveland-Hopkins          7/2523      10/3/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 24L, Amdt 3C.
                                                             Intl.
9-Nov-17.............  WI             New Lisbon..........  Mauston-New Lisbon         7/5065      10/2/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Orig-A.
                                                             Union.
9-Nov-17.............  WI             New Lisbon..........  Mauston-New Lisbon         7/5066      10/2/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig-B.
                                                             Union.
7-Dec-17.............  AZ             Page................  Page Muni...........       7/0314      9/27/17  VOR-B, Orig.
7-Dec-17.............  CA             Los Angeles.........  Los Angeles Intl....       7/0657      10/2/17  ILS OR LOC RWY 7R, Amdt 8.
7-Dec-17.............  TX             Houston.............  George Bush                7/0733      10/3/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 33R, Amdt 2A.
                                                             Intercontinental/
                                                             Houston.
7-Dec-17.............  MA             Beverly.............  Beverly Rgnl........       7/0961      10/2/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 34, Orig-D.
7-Dec-17.............  MA             Beverly.............  Beverly Rgnl........       7/0963      10/2/17  VOR RWY 16, Amdt 5C.
7-Dec-17.............  MA             Beverly.............  Beverly Rgnl........       7/0974      10/2/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Orig.
7-Dec-17.............  MA             Beverly.............  Beverly Rgnl........       7/0981      10/2/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 27, Amdt 1.
7-Dec-17.............  MA             Beverly.............  Beverly Rgnl........       7/1076      10/2/17  LOC RWY 16, Amdt 7C.
7-Dec-17.............  TN             Nashville...........  Nashville Intl......       7/1618      9/27/17  RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 31, Amdt 1.
7-Dec-17.............  AR             Blytheville.........  Blytheville Muni....       7/1636      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig.
7-Dec-17.............  MO             Potosi..............  Washington County...       7/1773      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 2, Amdt 2A.
7-Dec-17.............  MN             Glenwood............  Glenwood Muni.......       7/1898      9/27/17  VOR RWY 33, Amdt 2B.
7-Dec-17.............  NC             Lexington...........  Davidson County.....       7/1938      9/27/17  ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 6, Amdt 1B.
7-Dec-17.............  MI             Lakeview............  Lakeview-Griffith          7/2119      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Orig-A.
                                                             Field.
7-Dec-17.............  TX             Bowie...............  Bowie Muni..........       7/2144      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Amdt 1.
7-Dec-17.............  TX             Bowie...............  Bowie Muni..........       7/2145      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Orig.
7-Dec-17.............  TX             Bowie...............  Bowie Muni..........       7/2146      9/27/17  NDB RWY 17, Amdt 4.
7-Dec-17.............  AZ             Tucson..............  Tucson Intl.........       7/2148      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 11L, AMDT 1A.
7-Dec-17.............  NC             Greensboro..........  Piedmont Triad Intl.       7/2229      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 23L, Amdt 2B.
7-Dec-17.............  IL             Moline..............  Quad City Intl......       7/2247     9/26/17.  RNAV (GPS) RWY 27, Amdt 1B.
7-Dec-17.............  CO             Denver..............  Denver Intl.........       7/2261      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 8, AMDT 1B.
7-Dec-17.............  CO             Denver..............  Denver Intl.........       7/2264      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 17L, Amdt 1A.
7-Dec-17.............  CO             Denver..............  Denver Intl.........       7/2265      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 25, Amdt 1A.
7-Dec-17.............  TN             Nashville...........  Nashville Intl......       7/2615      9/27/17  RVAV (GPS) Y RWY 2C, Amdt 2.

7-Dec-17.............  IL             Savanna.............  Tri-Township........       7/2648      9/26/17  VOR/DME-A, Orig-A.
7-Dec-17.............  MN             Duluth..............  Duluth Intl.........       7/2934      10/2/17  VOR OR TACAN RWY 3, Amdt 21A.
7-Dec-17.............  SC             Charleston..........  Charleston Afb/Intl.       7/2965      9/27/17  ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 33, Amdt 8B.
7-Dec-17.............  TX             Houston.............  George Bush                7/3347      10/3/17  GLS RWY 27, Amdt 1A.
                                                             Intercontinental/
                                                             Houston.
7-Dec-17.............  CO             Colorado Springs....  City Of Colorado           7/3350      10/2/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 17L, Amdt 3A.
                                                             Springs Muni.
7-Dec-17.............  UT             Salt Lake City......  Salt Lake City Intl.       7/3383      10/2/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 2A.
7-Dec-17.............  UT             Salt Lake City......  Salt Lake City Intl.       7/3385      10/2/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 34L, Amdt 1B.
7-Dec-17.............  UT             Salt Lake City......  Salt Lake City Intl.       7/3386      10/2/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 34R, Amdt 1B.
7-Dec-17.............  NJ             Morristown..........  Morristown Muni.....       7/3405      9/28/17  ILS OR LOC RWY 23, Amdt 11.
7-Dec-17.............  LA             Alexandria..........  Alexandria Intl.....       7/3426      9/27/17  ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 14, Amdt 1.
7-Dec-17.............  NJ             Morristown..........  Morristown Muni.....       7/3428      9/28/17  RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 23, Amdt 1.
7-Dec-17.............  CA             Oakland.............  Metropolitan Oakland       7/3448      10/3/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 28R, Amdt 3.
                                                             Intl.
7-Dec-17.............  ME             Augusta.............  Augusta State.......       7/3522      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 8, Amdt 1.
7-Dec-17.............  IA             Dubuque.............  Dubuque Rgnl........       7/3686      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig.
7-Dec-17.............  CA             Bakersfield.........  Meadows Field.......       7/3688      9/28/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 30R, Amdt 2.
7-Dec-17.............  MA             Nantucket...........  Nantucket Memorial..       7/3691      10/2/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, Amdt 1A.
7-Dec-17.............  NY             Elmira/Corning......  Elmira/Corning Rgnl.       7/3702      9/28/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, Amdt 2A.
7-Dec-17.............  MI             Lansing.............  Capital Region Intl.       7/3730      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 10R, Orig.
7-Dec-17.............  MI             Lansing.............  Capital Region Intl.       7/3731      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 28L, Amdt 1.
7-Dec-17.............  MI             Pontiac.............  Oakland County Intl.       7/3734      9/28/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 9R, Orig.
7-Dec-17.............  MI             Battle Creek........  W K Kellogg.........       7/3737      9/28/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 23R, Amdt 1A.
7-Dec-17.............  ID             Pocatello...........  Pocatello Rgnl......       7/3738      9/28/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 21, Amdt 1A.
7-Dec-17.............  GA             Savannah............  Savannah/Hilton Head       7/3740      9/28/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Amdt 2.
                                                             Intl.
7-Dec-17.............  KY             Covington...........  Cincinnati/Northern        7/3786      9/26/17  ILS OR LOC RWY 27, Amdt 17B.
                                                             Kentucky Intl.
7-Dec-17.............  KY             Covington...........  Cincinnati/Northern        7/3787      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 36R, Amdt 1B.
                                                             Kentucky Intl.
7-Dec-17.............  CA             Oakland.............  Metropolitan Oakland       7/3795      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 30, Amdt 5C.
                                                             Intl.
7-Dec-17.............  MI             Grand Rapids........  Gerald R Ford Intl..       7/3819      9/27/17  ILS OR LOC RWY 26L, Amdt 21B.
7-Dec-17.............  MI             Grand Rapids........  Gerald R Ford Intl..       7/3820      9/27/17  ILS OR LOC RWY 35, Amdt 2.
7-Dec-17.............  MI             Grand Rapids........  Gerald R Ford Intl..       7/3821      9/27/17  ILS OR LOC RWY 8R, Amdt 6B.
7-Dec-17.............  MI             Grand Rapids........  Gerald R Ford Intl..       7/3826      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 8R, Amdt 1A.
7-Dec--17............  MI             Grand Rapids........  Gerald R Ford Intl..       7/3828      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 26L, Amdt 1A.
7-Dec-17.............  MI             Grand Rapids........  Gerald R Ford Intl..       7/3829      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Amdt 1A.
7-Dec-17.............  WA             Port Angeles........  William R Fairchild        7/3831      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Amdt 1.
                                                             Intl.
7-Dec-17.............  TX             Kerrville...........  Kerrville Muni/Louis       7/3940      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 12, Amdt 1.
                                                             Schreiner Field.
7-Dec-17.............  WA             Bellingham..........  Bellingham Intl.....       7/3997      10/2/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 16, Amdt 3A.
7-Dec-17.............  WA             Pasco...............  Tri-Cities..........       7/4045      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 21R, Amdt 2A.
7-Dec-17.............  MA             New Bedford.........  New Bedford Rgnl....       7/4060      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Amdt 1B.
7-Dec-17.............  MA             Vineyard Haven......  Martha's Vineyard...       7/4130      10/3/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, Amdt 2D.
7-Dec-17.............  TX             Waco................  Waco Rgnl...........       7/4483      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 19, Orig-B.
7-Dec-17.............  WA             Walla Walla.........  Walla Walla Rgnl....       7/4570      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 20, Amdt 1.
7-Dec-17.............  OH             Mansfield...........  Mansfield Lahm Rgnl.       7/4611      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig-D.
7-Dec-17.............  KY             Danville............  Stuart Powell Field.       7/4658      10/2/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 12, Orig.
7-Dec-17.............  KY             Danville............  Stuart Powell Field.       7/4662      10/2/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, Orig.
7-Dec-17.............  KY             Danville............  Stuart Powell Field.       7/4668      10/2/17  NDB-A, Amdt 8.
7-Dec-17.............  ME             Brunswick...........  Brunswick Executive.       7/4801      10/2/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 19L, Amdt 1A.
7-Dec-17.............  NY             New York............  Long Island Mac            7/4917      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, Amdt 3.
                                                             Arthur.
7-Dec-17.............  SC             Greer...............  Greenville                 7/4939      10/2/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Amdt 2A.
                                                             Spartanburg Intl.
7-Dec-17.............  IA             Mason City..........  Mason City Muni.....       7/6166      9/26/17  ILS OR LOC RWY 36, Amdt 6F.
7-Dec-17.............  TN             Jasper..............  Marion County-Brown        7/6472      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Orig-A.
                                                             Field.
7-Dec-17.............  IN             New Castle..........  New Castle-Henry Co        7/6600      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 27, Orig-A.
                                                             Muni.
7-Dec-17.............  SC             Anderson............  Anderson Rgnl.......       7/6804      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Amdt 1A.
7-Dec-17.............  LA             Monroe..............  Monroe Rgnl.........       7/6853      9/28/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Amdt 1A.
7-Dec-17.............  SC             Anderson............  Anderson Rgnl.......       7/7101      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Amdt 1.
7-Dec-17.............  SC             Anderson............  Anderson Rgnl.......       7/7105      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Amdt 1A.
7-Dec-17.............  SC             Anderson............  Anderson Rgnl.......       7/7106      9/26/17  ILS OR LOC RWY 5, Amdt 1A.
7-Dec-17.............  SC             Anderson............  Anderson Rgnl.......       7/7107      9/26/17  VOR RWY 5, Amdt 10.

7-Dec-17.............  SC             Anderson............  Anderson Rgnl.......       7/7115      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 1A.
7-Dec-17.............  FL             Tampa...............  Tampa Intl..........       7/7377      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 1L, Amdt 2B.
7-Dec-17.............  OK             Elk City............  Elk City Rgnl              7/7415      9/26/17  Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 1.
                                                             Business.
7-Dec-17.............  IN             Connersville........  Mettel Field........       7/7481      10/3/17  VOR-A, Amdt 1A.
7-Dec-17.............  AZ             Tucson..............  Tucson Intl.........       7/7560      9/26/17  RNAV (RNP) Y RWY 29R, Orig-D.
7-Dec-17.............  AZ             Tucson..............  Tucson Intl.........       7/7573      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 21, Orig-A.
7-Dec-17.............  IL             Chicago.............  Chicago O'Hare Intl.       7/7608      9/28/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 15, Amdt 2E.
7-Dec-17.............  NY             Schenectady.........  Schenectady County..       7/7666      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Orig-D.
7-Dec-17.............  TX             Houston.............  George Bush                7/7831      10/3/17  GLS RWY 8L, Amdt 1A.
                                                             Intercontinental/
                                                             Houston.
7-Dec-17.............  TX             Houston.............  George Bush                7/7833      10/3/17  GLS RWY 8R, Amdt 1A.
                                                             Intercontinental/
                                                             Houston.
7-Dec-17.............  TX             Houston.............  George Bush                7/7834      10/3/17  GLS RWY 9, Amdt 1A.
                                                             Intercontinental/
                                                             Houston.
7-Dec-17.............  TX             Houston.............  George Bush                7/7837      10/3/17  GLS RWY 26L, Amdt 1A.
                                                             Intercontinental/
                                                             Houston.
7-Dec-17.............  TX             Houston.............  George Bush                7/7838      10/3/17  GLS RWY 26R, Amdt 1A.
                                                             Intercontinental/
                                                             Houston.
7-Dec-17.............  FL             Titusville..........  Space Coast Rgnl....       7/7946      10/2/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Amdt 1A.
7-Dec-17.............  PA             Coatesville.........  Chester County G O         7/7990      9/26/17  ILS OR LOC RWY 29, Amdt 7.
                                                             Carlson.
7-Dec-17.............  PA             Coatesville.........  Chester County G O         7/7996      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 29, Orig.
                                                             Carlson.
7-Dec-17.............  PA             Coatesville.........  Chester County G O         7/7997      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 11, Orig.
                                                             Carlson.
7-Dec-17.............  MA             Provincetown........  Provincetown Muni...       7/8468      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 25, Orig-B.
7-Dec-17.............  MA             Provincetown........  Provincetown Muni...       7/8469      9/27/17  NDB RWY 25, Amdt 2B.
7-Dec-17.............  KS             Manhattan...........  Manhattan Rgnl......       7/8555      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 21, Amdt 1.
7-Dec-17.............  KS             Manhattan...........  Manhattan Rgnl......       7/8586      9/26/17  VOR/DME-F, Amdt 1.
7-Dec-17.............  KS             Manhattan...........  Manhattan Rgnl......       7/8589      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 3, Amdt 1.
7-Dec-17.............  KS             Manhattan...........  Manhattan Rgnl......       7/8593      9/26/17  ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 3, AMDT 7A.
7-Dec-17.............  MS             Madison.............  Bruce Campbell Field       7/8620      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 1B.
7-Dec- 17............  MS             Madison.............  Bruce Campbell Field       7/8624      9/26/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Orig-B.
7-Dec-17.............  CA             Susanville..........  Susanville Muni.....       7/9026      9/27/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 29, Amdt 1A.
7-Dec-17.............  LA             Slidell.............  Slidell.............       7/9663      10/2/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig-C.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2017-22503 Filed 10-18-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 191 (Friday, October 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59802-59803]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25133]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[USCG-2015-0748; OMB Control Number 1625-0047]

Information Collection Request to Office of Management and Budget

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Sixty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit an Information Collection Request
(ICRs) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting approval of a
revision of a currently approved collection: 1625-0047, Plan Approval
and Records for Vital System Automation. Our ICR describes the
information we seek to collect from the public. Before submitting this
ICR to OIRA, the Coast Guard is inviting comments as described below.

DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before December 1,
2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number [USCG-2015-0748] to the Docket Management Facility (DMF) at the
U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). To avoid duplicate
submissions, please use only one of the following means:
    (1) Online: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Mail: DMF (M-30), DOT, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-
140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (3) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. To ensure your comments are received in a
timely manner, mark the fax, to attention Desk Officer for the Coast
Guard.
    The DMF maintains the public docket for this Notice. Comments and
material received from the public, as well as documents mentioned in
this Notice as being available in the docket, will become part of the
docket and will be available for inspection or copying at room W12-140
on the West Building Ground Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also find the docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Copies of the ICR(s) are available through the docket on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are
available from: Commandant (CG-612), Attn Paperwork Reduction Act
Manager, U.S. Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE., Stop
7710, Washington, DC 20593-7710.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Contact Mr. Anthony Smith, Office of
Information Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for questions on these documents. Contact Ms. Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations,<PHONE_NUMBER>, for questions on the docket.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    This Notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended. An ICR is an application to
OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a Coast Guard
collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains information
describing the Collection's purpose, the Collection's likely burden on
the affected public, an explanation of the necessity of the Collection,
and other important information describing the Collection. There is one
ICR for each Collection.
    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether these ICRs should be
granted based on the Collections being necessary for the proper
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the
Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the Collection;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information
subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
Collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. In response to
your comments, we may revise these ICRs or decide not to seek approval
of revisions of the Collection. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments
and related materials. Comments must contain the OMB Control Number of
the

ICR and the docket number of this request, [USCG-2015-0748], and must
be received by December 1, 2015. We will post all comments received,
without change, to http://www.regulations.gov. They will include any
personal information you provide. We have an agreement with DOT to use
their DMF. Please see the ``Privacy Act'' paragraph below.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number [USCG-
2015-0748], indicate the specific section of the document to which each
comment applies, providing a reason for each comment. You may submit
your comments and material online (via http://www.regulations.gov), by
fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use only one of these means. If
you submit a comment online via www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit
the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is
received at the DMF. We recommend you include your name, mailing
address, an email address, or other contact information in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
    You may submit your comments and material by electronic means,
mail, fax, or delivery to the DMF at the address under ADDRESSES; but
please submit them by only one means. To submit your comment online, go
to http://www.regulations.gov, and type ``USCG-2015-0748'' in the
``Search'' box. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by
mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period
and will address them accordingly.
    Viewing comments and documents: To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this Notice as being available in the docket, go
to http://www.regulations.gov, click on the ``read comments'' box,
which will then become highlighted in blue. In the ``Search'' box
insert ``USCG-2015-0748'' and click ``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket
Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column. You may also visit the DMF in Room
W12-140 on the ground floor of the DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received in
dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act statement
regarding Coast Guard public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of
the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Information Collection Request

    1. Title: Plan Approval and Records for Vital System Automation.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0047.
    Summary: This information collection pertains to the vital system
automation on commercial vessels that is necessary to protect personnel
and property on board U.S.-Flag vessels.
    Need: 46 U.S.C. 3306 authorizes the Coast Guard to promulgate
regulations for the safety of personnel and property on board vessels.
Various sections within parts 61 and 62 of Title 46 of the Code of
Federal Regulations contain these rules.
    Forms: None.
    Respondents: Owners, operators, shipyards, designers, and
manufacturers of certain vessels.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has increased from 39,900
hours to 46,500 hours a year due to an increase in the estimated annual
number of responses.
    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35, as amended.

    Dated: September 18, 2015.
Thomas P. Michelli,
U.S. Coast Guard, Deputy Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-25133 Filed 10-1-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 6 (Thursday, January 9, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1172-1173]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00184]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2020-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2001]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, the FIRM and FIS
report, once effective, will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before April 8, 2020.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location https://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata and the
respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-2001, to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and are used to calculate the appropriate
flood insurance premium rates for new buildings built after the FIRM
and FIS report become effective.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide

recommendations for resolution. Use of the SRP only may be exercised
after FEMA and local communities have been engaged in a collaborative
consultation process for at least 60 days without a mutually acceptable
resolution of an appeal. Additional information regarding the SRP
process can be found online at https://www.floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_overview.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location
https://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata and the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the tables. For communities
with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies can be
identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM date
listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Manistee County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions)
          Project: 14-05-3368S Preliminary Date: June 10, 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charter Township of Filer..............  Filer Charter Township Hall,
                                          2505 Filer City Road,
                                          Manistee, MI 49660.
City of Manistee.......................  Manistee County Planning
                                          Department, 415 Third Street,
                                          Manistee, MI 49660.
Township of Arcadia....................  Township Hall, 3422 Lake
                                          Street, Arcadia, MI 49613.
Township of Brown......................  Brown Township Hall, 9763
                                          Coates Highway, Manistee, MI
                                          49660.
Township of Manistee...................  Township Hall, 410 Holden
                                          Street, Manistee, MI 49660.
Township of Onekama....................  Township Offices, 5435 Main
                                          Street, Onekama, MI 49675.
Township of Pleasanton.................  Pleasanton Township Hall, 8958
                                          Lumley Road, Bear Lake, MI
                                          49614.
Township of Stronach...................  Stronach Township Hall, 2471
                                          Main Street, RR3, Manistee, MI
                                          49660.
Village of Eastlake....................  Village Hall, 175 South Main
                                          Street, Eastlake, MI 49626.
Village of Onekama.....................  Village Offices, 5283 Main
                                          Street, Onekama, MI 49675.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2020-00184 Filed 1-8-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P