[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 180 (Monday, September 17, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46898-46900]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19862]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0739; Product Identifier 2015-NE-07-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Turboshaft
Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede airworthiness directive (AD) 2015-20-
04, which applies to certain Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. (P&WC) PT6B-
37A turboshaft engines. AD 2015-20-04 requires initial and repetitive
inspections until replacement of the No. 10 bearing, and eventual
replacement of the No. 9 bearing, both located in the engine reduction
gearbox (RGB) assembly. Since we issued AD 2015-20-04, P&WC has
determined that the repetitive inspection of the bearings has an
associated risk of gearbox damage or contamination and that the bearing
installation required by AD 2015-20-04 does not adequately address the
issue of bearing axial movement. This proposed AD would require removal
from service and replacement of the No. 9 and No. 10 position bearings.
We are proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 1,
2018.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Pratt &
Whitney Canada Corp., 1000 Marie-Victorin, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada,
J4G 1A1; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; website: http://www.pwc.ca. You may view this service information at the FAA, Engine &
Propeller Standards Branch, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
781-238-7759.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0739; or in person at the Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, the mandatory continuing airworthiness information,
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for Docket Operations (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
listed above. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Caufield, Aerospace Engineer,
ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:
781-238-7146; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2018-0739;
Product Identifier 2015-NE-07-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this NPRM because
of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We issued AD 2015-20-04, Amendment 39-18282 (80 FR 61717, October
14, 2015), (``AD 2015-20-04''), for certain P&WC PT6B-37A turboshaft
engines. AD 2015-20-04 requires initial and repetitive inspections
until replacement of the No. 10 bearing, and eventual replacement of
the No. 9 bearing, both located in the engine RGB assembly. AD 2015-20-
04 resulted from reports of incorrect engine torque for PT6B-37A
engines. We issued AD 2015-20-04 to prevent axial movement at the No.
10 bearing position in the engine RGB assembly, which could result in
engine overtorque, failure of the engine, in-flight shutdown, and loss
of the helicopter.

Actions Since AD 2015-20-04 Was Issued

    Since we issued AD 2015-20-04, P&WC has determined that the
repetitive inspection of the bearings in P&WC Service Bulletin (SB)
PT6B-72-39095, Revision No. 3, dated December 29, 2014, has an
associated risk of gearbox damage or contamination. P&WC also
determined that the bearing installation in P&WC SB No. PT6B-72-39092,
Revision No. 4, dated December 29, 2014, as required by AD 2015-20-04,
does not adequately address the issue of bearing axial movement.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed P&WC SB No. PT6B-72-39108, dated September 30, 2016.
The SB describes procedures for replacing affected bearings. This
service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Other Related Service Information

    We reviewed P&WC SB No. PT6B-72-39092, Revision No. 4, dated
December 29, 2014. The service information describes procedures for
removing affected bearings.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or

develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would retain none of the requirements of AD 2015-
20-04. This proposed AD would introduce a new bearing configuration
that addresses the axial movement at the No. 9 and No. 10 bearing
positions and remove the repetitive inspection requirements of AD 2015-
20-04. This proposed AD would also remove the previously mandated
bearing configuration in P&WC SB No. PT6B-72-39092, Revision No. 4,
dated December 29, 2014.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 119 engines installed on
helicopters of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remove and replace No. 9 and No. 10     65 work-hours x $85 per          $37,874         $43,399      $5,164,481
 bearings.                               hour = $5,525.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to engines, propellers, and
associated appliances to the Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2015-20-04, Amendment 39-18282 (80 FR 61717, October 14, 2015), (``AD
2015-20-04''), and adding the following new AD:

Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp.: Docket No. FAA-2018-0739; Product
Identifier 2015-NE-07-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by November 1,
2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2015-20-04, Amendment 39-18282 (80 FR 61717,
October 14, 2015).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. (P&WC) PT6B-37A
turboshaft engines with serial number (S/N) PCE-PU0275 or earlier or
with engine S/N PCE-PU0278.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7210, Turbine Engine
Reduction Gear.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of incorrect engine torque for
PT6B-37A turboshaft engines. We are issuing this AD to prevent axial
movement at the No. 10 bearing position in the engine reduction
gearbox (RGB) assembly. The unsafe condition, if not addressed,
could result in engine overtorque, failure of the engine, in-flight
shutdown, and loss of the helicopter.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    (1) For affected engines that did not have the bearings replaced
in accordance with P&WC Service Bulletin (SB) No. PT6B-72-39092,
Revision No. 4, dated December 29, 2014, or earlier revision:
    (i) Remove from service and replace the No. 9 and No. 10
position bearings at the next engine shop visit after the effective
date of this AD, but no later than December 31, 2020, whichever
occurs first, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions,
paragraphs 3.A. and B., of P&WC SB PT6B-72-39108, dated September
30, 2016.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (2) For affected engines that had the bearings replaced in
accordance with P&WC SB No. PT6B-72-39092, Revision No. 4, dated
December 29, 2014, or earlier revision:
    (i) Remove from service and replace the No. 9 and No. 10
position bearings before December 31, 2020, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs 3.A. and B., of P&WC SB
PT6B-72-39108, dated September 30, 2016.

    (ii) Reserved.

(h) Definition

    For the purpose of this AD, an ``engine shop visit'' is the
induction of an engine into the shop for maintenance involving the
separation of pairs of major mating engine flanges, or any removal
of the RGB assembly.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. You may email your
request to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(j) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Barbara
Caufield, Aerospace Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected].
    (2) Refer to Transport Canada AD CF-2015-01R1, dated November
18, 2016, for more information. You may examine the Transport Canada
AD in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating it in Docket No. FAA-2018-0739.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Pratt
& Whitney Canada Corp., 1000 Marie-Victorin, Longueuil, Quebec,
Canada J4G 1A1; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; website:
http://www.pwc.ca. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Engine & Propeller Standards Branch, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on September 7, 2018.
Robert J. Ganley,
Manager, Engine & Propeller Standards Branch, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-19862 Filed 9-14-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 4, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61263-61266]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25344]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2010-0842]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zones; Annual Firework Displays Within the Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound Area of Responsibility

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending our regulations to correct the
coordinates for four firework displays. This action is necessary to
prevent injury and to protect life and property

of the maritime public from the hazards associated with the firework
displays. During the enforcement periods, entry into, transit through,
mooring, or anchoring within these zones is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or Designated
Representative.

DATES: This rule is effective November 3, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-0842 and are available online
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0842 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or e-mail Ensign Anthony P. LaBoy, USCG Sector Puget Sound
Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-
mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this final rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is unnecessary and contrary to the
public interest. This action is a technical amendment to the rule to
reflect the appropriate coordinates of these locations. The new
coordinates listed below are the actual location that these displays
have occurred without comment or objections from the maritime public in
past years. This action is also necessary to prevent injury and to
protect life and property of the maritime public from the hazards
associated with the firework displays.

Basis and Purpose

    The coordinates currently codified under this section do not
correctly reflect the location of where the displays actually occur.
The Coast Guard is amending the coordinates to list the correct
coordinates for the locations.

Background

    On February 25, 2010 we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Safety Zones; Annual Firework Displays Within the
Captain of the Port, Puget Sound Area of Responsibility in the Federal
Register (75 FR 8566). We received 00 comments on the proposed rule. On
June 15, 2010 the Coast Guard published a document in the Federal
Register (75 FR 33700), establishing safety zones for fireworks
displays within the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound Area of
Responsibility. That notice provided a table which listed the
coordinates of each firework display. The submitted coordinates
differed from the actual coordinates for four of the fireworks
displays. This rule changes the coordinates listed for four displays to
the proper position. During the enforcement periods, entry into,
transit through, mooring, or anchoring within these zones is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or Designated
Representative.

Discussion of Rule

    The Coast Guard is amending 33 CFR 165.1332 to correct coordinates
listed for four firework displays that occur annually within the
Captain of the Port, Puget Sound Area of Responsibility.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under that those Orders.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that
this proposed rule, if promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule
would not affect any small entities since this rule does not involve
creating any new safety zones but instead amends the current
coordinates to reflect the appropriate coordinates of the locations.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, as supplemented by
Executive Order 13563, and is not likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator
of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated
it as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a
Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction. This rule involves amending the coordinates of four
firework displays codified under 33 CFR 165.1332. An environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165, as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1

0
2. In Sec.  165.1332, revise the following entries in the table in
(a)(1) to read as follows:
    (a) * * *
    (1) * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Event name                 Event location              Latitude                    Longitude
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Anacortes.................  Fidalgo Bay.........  48[deg]30.016' N            122[deg]36.154' W

                                                  * * * * * * *
City of Kenmore Fireworks.........  Lake Forest Park....  47[deg]45.25' N             122[deg]15.75' W

                                                  * * * * * * *
Vashon Island Fireworks...........  Quartermaster Harbor  47[deg]24.0' N              122[deg]27.0' W

                                                  * * * * * * *
Friday Harbor Independence........  Friday Harbor.......  48[deg]32.255' N            123[deg]0.654' W
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

    Dated: September 12, 2011.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2011-25344 Filed 10-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 1, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5435-5438]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01962]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R08-OAR-2021-0775; FRL-9330-01-R8]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Utah;
Emissions Statement Rule and Nonattainment New Source Review
Requirements for the 2015 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standard for the Uinta Basin, Northern Wasatch Front and Southern
Wasatch Front Nonattainment Areas

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve state implementation plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the
State of Utah. The revisions fulfill the emissions statement and
nonattainment new source review (NNSR) requirements for the 2015 8-hour
ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for the Uinta
Basin, Northern Wasatch Front, and Southern Wasatch Front nonattainment
areas (NAAs). Utah submitted an emissions statement rule revision and a
separate NNSR certification to meet, in part, the nonattainment
requirements for Marginal ozone NAAs under the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
The State's submission of the emissions statement rule revision also
included revisions to emissions reporting requirements for stationary
sources, which will be addressed in this proposed rule as well. The EPA
is taking this action pursuant to sections 110, 172, and 182 of the
Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before March 3, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-
OAR-2021-0775, to the Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
www.regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points

you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on
the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional
submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information
about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making
effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available electronically in
www.regulations.gov. To reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission, for
this action we do not plan to offer hard copy review of the docket.
Please email or call the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section if you need to make alternative arrangements for access
to the docket.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Lang, Air and Radiation
Division, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode 8ARD-IO, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202-1129, telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.

I. Background

    Ground-level ozone is formed when nitrogen oxides (NOX)
and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) react in the presence of
sunlight. Referred to as ozone precursors, these two pollutants are
emitted by many types of pollution sources, including motor vehicles,
power plants, industrial facilities, and area wide sources, such as
consumer products and lawn and garden equipment. Scientific evidence
indicates that adverse public health effects may occur following
exposure to ozone pollution. These effects are more pronounced in
children and adults with lung disease. Breathing air containing ozone
can reduce lung function and inflame airways, which can increase
respiratory symptoms and aggravate asthma or other lung diseases. In
1979, in response to this scientific evidence, the EPA promulgated the
first ozone NAAQS, the 0.12 part per million (ppm) 1-hour ozone
NAAQS.\1\ The EPA had previously promulgated a NAAQS for total
photochemical oxidants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for
Photochemical Oxidants, 44 FR 8202 (Feb. 8, 1979).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On July 18, 1997, the EPA promulgated a revised ozone NAAQS of 0.08
ppm, averaged over eight hours.\2\ The EPA determined this standard to
be more protective of public health than the previous 1979 1-hour ozone
standard. In 2008, the EPA revised the 8-hour ozone NAAQS from 0.08 to
0.075 ppm.\3\ On October 26, 2015, the EPA again strengthened the 8-
hour ozone NAAQS to 0.070 ppm, based on extensive scientific evidence
about ozone's effects on public health and welfare.\4\ Effective August
3, 2018, the EPA designated the Uinta Basin, Northern Wasatch Front,
and Southern Wasatch Front areas as Marginal nonattainment for the more
stringent 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone, 62 FR
38856.
    \3\ National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone, 73 FR
16436 (March 27, 2008).
    \4\ National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone, 80 FR
65292.
    \5\ Additional Air Quality Designations for the 2015 Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards, 83 FR 25776 (June 4, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Uinta Basin NAA is comprised of portions of Duchesne and Uintah
Counties. The Northern Wasatch Front NAA includes Salt Lake, Davis, and
portions of Weber and Tooele Counties. The Southern Wasatch Front NAA
is comprised of only a portion of Utah County.
    Under section 182(a)(3)(B) of the CAA, Utah is required to
implement an emissions statement rule in its Marginal NAAs that
requires the owner or operator of each stationary source of
NOX or VOCs to provide the state with an annual statement
showing the actual emissions of NOX and VOCs from the
source.\6\ This requirement may be waived for any class or category of
stationary sources which emit less than 25 tons per year of
NOX or VOCs if the state includes these emissions in the
base year or periodic emissions inventories.\7\ Under section 172(c)(5)
and 172(b) of the CAA, Utah is required to have implemented a NNSR
permit program within three years from the effective date of
designation.\8\ In addition to these two requirements, Utah is required
to submit a base year emissions inventory of NOX and VOCs
for its Marginal NAAs under section 182(a)(1) of the CAA.\9\ These
three requirements together constitute the Marginal SIP. EPA has
previously approved Utah's base year emissions inventory in the Uinta
Basin, Northern Wasatch Front and Southern Wasatch Front NAAs.\10\ With
the proposed approval of the State's emissions statement rule revisions
and NNSR certification, which are the subject of this action, Utah will
have met all requirements for its Marginal NAAs under the 2015 8-hour
ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 42 U.S.C. 7511a(a)(3)(B)(i)
    \7\ 42 U.S.C. 7511a(a)(3)(B)(ii)
    \8\ Id. 7502(c)(5); Id. 7502(b).
    \9\ Id. 7511a(a)(1).
    \10\ Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Utah;
2017 Base Year Inventories for the 2015 8-Hour Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard for the Uinta Basin, Northern Wasatch
Front and Southern Wasatch Front Nonattainment Areas, 86 FR 35404
(July 7, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Summary of SIP Revision

A. Emission Inventories Rule Revision

    On November 3, 2020, the Utah Division of Air Quality (UDAQ)
submitted a SIP revision titled ``R307-150. Permit: Emission
Inventories'' which includes provisions to satisfy the emissions
statement requirement under CAA section 182(a)(3)(B).\11\ Utah met the
reasonable notice and public hearing requirements of CAA section 110(a)
for the revision to its emissions inventory requirements through
reasonable notice posted on July 1, 2020, and notice of a public
hearing for August 3, 2020.\12\ Utah's emissions inventory SIP revision
describes two changes to Rule R307-150 of the Utah Administrative Code
(UAC). The first change converts summary-only emissions inventory
reports to detailed reports and the second introduces reporting
requirements specific to sources in ozone NAAs. Additional minor
clerical revisions that do not affect the substance of the requirements
of the rule were made throughout Rule R307-150 and are also being
proposed for approval except for those in Section R307-150-8 as well as
those in Subsection R307-150-3(4) which contain revisions that have not
been incorporated into the Utah SIP.\13\ The clerical revisions that
are included in these unincorporated sections of Rule R307-150 will be
addressed in a future action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Letter dated October 28, 2020, from Gary R. Herbert,
Governor, State of Utah, to Gregory Sopkin, Regional Administrator,
EPA, Region 8.
    \12\ Utah, Utah Administrative Documentation, R307-150. Permit:
Emission Inventories, November 2020 (``UT Emissions Inventory SIP
Revision'').
    \13\ When we describe changes as clerical in this proposed
action, we are referring to changes such as section renumbering;
alphabetizing of definitions; minor grammatical, editorial, and
typographical revisions; and changes in capitalization.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Conversion of Summary-Only to Detailed Emissions Inventory Reporting
    The first change of Utah's emissions inventory SIP submittal
requires that all facilities submit detailed inventory data which was
accomplished through removal of Section R307-150-7 and Subsection R307-
150-3(4) regarding its applicability as well as the addition of
Subsection R307-150-3(3)(d), effective September 3, 2020.\14\
Previously, Section R307-150-7 required certain facilities to only
submit facility totals for each pollutant while other facilities were
required to report permitted equipment-level information.\15\ The
revision removes Section R307-150-7 and Subsection R307-150-3(4)
regarding its applicability while adding Subsection R307-150-3(3)(d) to
require Part 70 sources not included in Subsections R307-150-3(2) and
R307-150-3(3)(a)-(c) to submit detailed inventory data as specified by
Section R307-150-6.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ UT Emissions Inventory SIP Revision at 69, 73, 75, 97.
    \15\ Id. at 69.
    \16\ Id. at 73, 75.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Annual Ozone Emissions Statements
    The other change included in Utah's emissions inventory SIP
revisions adds Section R307-150-9 entitled ``Annual Ozone Emission
Statement'' and Subsection R307-150-3(5) regarding its applicability,
effective September 3, 2020. This revision requires sources to submit
an annual ozone emissions statement to UDAQ by April 15 showing
emissions of NOX and VOCs from the prior year, with the
first such statement having been due in 2021.\17\ As specified in the
SIP revision, which adds Subsection R307-150-3(5) regarding the annual
ozone emissions statement rule applicability, this rule applies to
stationary sources in designated ozone nonattainment areas that have
the potential to emit greater than 25 tons per year of NOX
or VOCs.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Id. at 76.
    \18\ Id. at 73.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. NNSR Certification

    On August 2, 2021, UDAQ submitted a SIP revision certifying that
Utah's existing NNSR permit program fulfills the requirements under CAA
section 172(c)(5).\19\ Utah met the requirements of CAA section 110(a)
for the SIP revision certifying its existing NNSR permit program
through reasonable notice posted on May 28, 2021 and notice of a public
hearing for July 1, 2021.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Submittal with letter dated July 29, 2021, from Kimberly
Shelley, Executive Director, Utah Department of Environmental
Quality, to Debra Thomas, Acting Regional Administrator, EPA, Region
8 (``UT NNSR Certification'').
    \20\ UT NNSR Certification at 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NNSR permit program requirements were adopted for the 2015 ozone
NAAQS at 40 CFR 51.1314 by the SIP Requirements Rule implementing the
2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS.\21\ The minimum SIP requirements for NNSR
permitting programs for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS are located at 40
CFR 51.165.\22\ The SIP for each ozone nonattainment area must contain
NNSR provisions that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ Final Rule, Implementation of the 2015 National Ambient Air
Quality Standards for Ozone: Nonattainment Area State Implementation
Plan Requirements, 83 FR 62998 (Dec. 6, 2018).
    \22\ 40 CFR 51.1314 includes new source review requirements for
the 2015 Ozone NAAQS with reference to specific requirements at 40
CFR 51.165.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Set major source thresholds for NOX and VOCs
pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(iv)(A)(1)(i)-(iv) and (2);
     Classify physical changes as a major source if the change
would constitute a major source by itself pursuant to 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(iv)(A)(3);
     Consider any significant net emissions increase of
NOX as a significant net emissions increase for ozone
pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(v)(E);
     Consider certain increases of VOC emissions in extreme
ozone nonattainment areas as a significant net emissions increase and a
major modification for ozone pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(v)(F);
     Set significant emissions rates for VOC and NOX
as ozone precursors pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(x)(A)-(C) and (E);
     Contain provisions for emissions reductions credits
pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(3)(ii)(C)(1)-(2);
     Provide that the requirements applicable to VOC also apply
to NOX pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(8); and
     Set offset ratios for VOC and NOX pursuant to
40 CFR 51.165(a)(9)(ii)-(iv).\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 40 CFR 51.165.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Utah's NNSR SIP Revision certifies that Utah's existing NNSR permit
program, applicable to the Uinta Basin, Northern Wasatch Front and
Southern Wasatch Front NAAs under the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS, is at
least as stringent as the minimum requirements for NNSR permitting
programs for the ozone NAAQS at 40 CFR 51.165.\24\ Utah's SIP-approved
NNSR program, as established in UAC R307-403, incorporates by reference
the definitions at 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1).\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ UT NNSR Certification at 6.
    \25\ UAC R307-403-1(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Proposed Action

    We are proposing to approve the SIP revision submitted by Utah
which included changes to R307-150 concerning the level of detail of
emissions inventory data reported by certain sources as well as
implementation of an annual ozone emissions statement rule for
stationary sources in ozone NAAs. Additionally, we are proposing to
approve the SIP revision submitted by Utah certifying that the State's
previously approved NNSR permit program meets the requirement stemming
from the Marginal ozone nonattainment designations of the Uinta Basin,
Northern Wasatch Front, and Southern Wasatch Front areas. We are
proposing to approve the revisions because they were prepared in
accordance with the requirements in sections 182(a)(3)(B), 172(c)(5)
and 172(b) of the CAA. The EPA is soliciting public comments on the
issues discussed in this document. The EPA will consider these comments
before taking final action.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, the EPA is proposing to include regulatory text
in an EPA final rule that includes incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference the UDAQ rules regarding stationary source
reporting requirements for emission inventories discussed in Sections
II.A.1 and II.A.2 of this preamble. The EPA has made, and will continue
to make, these materials generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 8 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735,

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and will
not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Greenhouse gases, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental
relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic
compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: January 26, 2022.
KC Becker,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2022-01962 Filed 1-31-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 148 (Tuesday, August 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 50701]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18329]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9950-14-OAR]

Clean Air Act Advisory Committee (CAAAC): Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announces an
upcoming public teleconference of the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee
(CAAAC) to discuss draft recommendations from the Ports Initiative
Workgroup of the Mobile Sources Technical Review Subcommittee (MSTRS).
The EPA established the CAAAC on November 19, 1990, to provide
independent advice and counsel to EPA on policy issues associated with
implementation of the Clean Air Act of 1990. The Committee advises on
economic, environmental, technical, scientific and enforcement policy
issues.

DATES: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. App. 2 Section 10(a) (2), notice is hereby
given that the CAAAC will hold a teleconference to discuss draft
recommendations from the MSTRS Ports Initiative Workgroup on September
7, 2016 from 2:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. (Eastern Time).
    Inspection of Committee Documents: The committee agenda and any
documents prepared for the meeting will be publicly available on the
CAAAC Web site at http://www.epa.gov/oar/caaac/ prior to the meeting.
Thereafter, these documents, together with CAAAC meeting minutes, will
be available on the CAAAC Web site or by contacting the Office of Air
and Radiation Docket and requesting information under docket EPA-HQ-
OAR-2004-0075. The docket office can be reached by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any member of the public who wants
further information concerning the CAAAC's public teleconference may
contact Tamara Saltman at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Sarah Froman at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>of the Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. EPA.
Additional information about this meeting, the CAAAC, and its
subcommittees and workgroups can be found on the CAAAC Web site: http://www.epa.gov/oar/caaac/. For information on access or services for
individuals with disabilities, please contact Lorraine Reddick at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>preferably at least 10 days prior to the
meeting to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: July 19, 2016.
Jim DeMocker,
Interim Designated Federal Officer, Clean Air Act Advisory Committee,
Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2016-18329 Filed 8-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Farm ID # _______________

Methyl Bromide Critical Use Exemption Enterprise Budget Work Sheets Methyl Bromide Tomatoes  Ruskin Palmetto  Fall  Single Crop Yield Cartons Per Acre IFAS Average 1,350 Farm Information Cost Information IFAS Farm Information Acre Carton Acre Carton Pre Harvest Production Costs:

Fertilizer 417.21 Fumigant 573.75 Crop Protection Materials 980.03 Transplants/ Seeds 256.00 Stakes 32.00 Plastic String 120.00 Plastic Mulch/ Irrigation Tubing 294.00 Frost Protection Machinery: Irrigation 198.64 Non irrigation 632.75 Plastic Mulch/ Drip Tape Disposal 198.42 Scounting 35.00 Labor Costs: Tractor Drivers 365.94 Direct Labor 297.77 Miscellaneous Interest 217.99 Fixed Costs: Land Cost 300.00 Supervision 940.30 Overhead 1,175.38 Total Pre Harvest Production Costs: 7,035.18 $ 5.21 $  $ # DIV/ 0!

Harvesting 1,039.50 $ 0.77 $ # DIV/ 0!

Packing, Selling & Related Overhead 3,429.00 $ 2.54 $ # DIV/ 0!

TOTAL COST: 11,503.68 $ 8.52 $  $ # DIV/ 0! Farming Costs:

dwcgi 15181 1081177380 946657000. xls August 3, 2003


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 14 (Wednesday, January 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 3585]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01142]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER13-2462-000.
    Applicants: Pheasant Run Wind II, LLC.
    Description: Request for Authorization of an Earlier Effective Date
of January 23, 2013 for Market-Based Rate Tariff of Pheasant Run Wind
II, LLC.
    Filed Date: 1/14/14.
    Accession Number: 20140114-5090.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/24/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-41-001; ER14-42-001; ER12-1911-002; ER12-1912-
002; ER12-1913-002; ER12-1915-002; ER12-1916-002; ER12-1917-002.
    Applicants: RE Rosamond One LLC, RE Rosamond Two LLC, RE McKenzie 1
LLC, RE McKenzie 2 LLC, RE McKenzie 3 LLC, RE McKenzie 4 LLC, RE
McKenzie 5 LLC, RE McKenzie 6 LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of KKR MBR
Sellers.
    Filed Date: 1/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140113-5174.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-987-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company submits Amendments
Distribution Service Agreements with Coram CELLC and SEPV1 to be
effective 12/15/2013.
    Filed Date: 1/14/14.
    Accession Number: 20140114-5073.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/4/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-989-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company submits Amendments
to Distribution Service Agmts with Several Interconnection Customers to
be effective 12/15/2013.
    Filed Date: 1/14/14.
    Accession Number: 20140114-5077.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/4/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-990-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. submits
2014-01-14--ER14--------000--LMR Netting Filing to be effective 3/15/
2014.
    Filed Date: 1/14/14.
    Accession Number: 20140114-5086.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/4/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-991-000.
    Applicants: Northern Indiana Public Service Company.
    Description: Northern Indiana Public Service Company submits Filing
of Supplement to FERC Elec Rate Sch No. 14 to be effective 1/15/2014.
    Filed Date: 1/14/14.
    Accession Number: 20140114-5089.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/4/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-992-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits Queue Position Y3-
046 & Y3-051; Original Service Agreement No. 3685 to be effective 12/
12/2013.
    Filed Date: 1/14/14.
    Accession Number: 20140114-5114.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/4/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-993-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. submits
2014-01-14--SA 2418--Wolverine-Tower Kleber Amd IA to be effective 3/
15/2014.
    Filed Date: 1/14/14.
    Accession Number: 20140114-5115.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/4/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-994-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. submits
2014-01-14--SA 1872--Wolverine-Tower Kleber WDS Agr to be effective 3/
15/2014.
    Filed Date: 1/14/14.
    Accession Number: 20140114-5116.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/4/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-995-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits Original Service
Agreement No. 3736; Queue No. Y3-026 to be effective 12/12/2013.
    Filed Date: 1/14/14.
    Accession Number: 20140114-5127.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/4/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-997-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company submits SGIA and
Distribution Service Agmt with TA-High Desert LLC to be effective 12/
15/2013.
    Filed Date: 1/14/14.
    Accession Number: 20140114-5130.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/4/14.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: January 14, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-01142 Filed 1-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P