[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49506-49508]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19857]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC14-124-000.
    Applicants: Integrys Energy Group, Inc., Integrys Energy Services,
Inc., Integrys Energy Services of New York, Inc., Exelon Generation
Company, LLC.
    Description: Joint Application for Authorization under Section 203
of the FPA and Requests for Confidential Treatment and Waivers of
Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Integrys Energy Group, Inc., et al.
    Filed Date: 8/12/14.

    Accession Number: 20140812-5139.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/2/14.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG14-84-000.
    Applicants: Major Oak Power, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Major Oak Power, LLC.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5111.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2273-001.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of Colorado.
    Description: 2014-8-13--Att U--U-1--Svc Agmt-IA-NSP 0.0.1-Filing to
be effective 8/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5079.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2286-001.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: 2014-08-13--ATC D-T IAs Update Batch 2 Amendment to be
effective 8/27/2014.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5108.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2293-001.
    Applicants: DTE Electric Company.
    Description: Cancel PLD Wholesale Distribution Agreement to be
effective 7/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5131.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2639-000.
    Applicants: Sirius Investment Management, Inc.
    Description: Notice of cancellation of its market-based rate tariff
etc.
    Filed Date: 8/11/14.
    Accession Number: 20140812-0001.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/2/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2640-000.
    Applicants: Lake Erie CleanPower Connector.
    Description: Request for Order Confirming Negotiated Rate Authority
of ITC Lake Erie Connector.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5037.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2641-000.
    Applicants: Electric Energy, Inc.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 8/14/
2014.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5084.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2642-000.
    Applicants: Dynegy Oakland, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 8/14/
2014.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5085.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2643-000.
    Applicants: Dynegy Energy Services, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 8/14/
2014.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5086.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2644-000.
    Applicants: Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 8/14/
2014.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5087.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2645-000.
    Applicants: Dynegy Kendall Energy, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 8/14/
2014.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5088.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2646-000.
    Applicants: Casco Bay Energy Company, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 8/14/
2014.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5089.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2647-000.
    Applicants: Dynegy Power Marketing, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 8/14/
2014.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5090.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2648-000.
    Applicants: Dynegy Moss Landing, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 8/14/
2014.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5091.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2649-000.
    Applicants: Illinois Power Resources Generating, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 8/14/
2014.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5092.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2650-000.
    Applicants: Dynegy Marketing and Trade, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 8/14/
2014.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5093.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2651-000.
    Applicants: Ontelaunee Power Operating Company, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 8/14/
2014.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5094.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2652-000.
    Applicants: Sithe/Independence Power Partners, L.P.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 8/14/
2014.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5095.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2653-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: WAPA 2436 Agreement for Interconnections &
Transmission Service to be effective 10/13/2014.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5098.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2654-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: 2014-08-13--SA 2673 Odell Wind-NSP Amended E&P
Agreement (G826) to be effective 8/14/2014.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5109.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2655-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: 2014-08-14--SA 2684 GRE-MP Ortman T-T IA to be
effective 8/14/2014.
    Filed Date: 8/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140813-5132.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/3/14.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 13, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-19857 Filed 8-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 47 (Friday, March 9, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10419-10422]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04734]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0083]
RIN 1625-AA08

Safety Zone; Mississippi Sound, Biloxi, MS

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
for certain navigable waters on the Mississippi Sound over the Biloxi
Harbor Channel in Biloxi, MS. The proposed rulemaking is necessary to
provide for the safety of life and property on these navigable waters
during the 2018 Biloxi Air Show. This proposed rulemaking would
prohibit persons and vessels from entering the safety zone unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Mobile (COTP)
or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this
proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before April 9, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0083 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email LT Kyle D. Berry, Sector Mobile,
Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 251-441-
5940, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Mobile
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
PATCOM Patrol Commander
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On January 3, 2018, the sponsor for the 2018 Biloxi Air Show
submitted an application for a marine event permit

for the air show that will take place every day from 9 a.m. through 5
p.m. from July 19, 2018 through July 22, 2018. The air show will
consist of various flight demonstrations over the Mississippi Sound in
the Biloxi Harbor Channel in Biloxi, MS. Over the years, there have
been unfortunate instances of aircraft mishaps that involve crashing
during performances at various air shows around the world.
Occasionally, these incidents result in a wide area of scattered debris
in the water that can damage property or cause significant injury or
death to the public observing the air shows. The Captain of the Port
Sector Mobile (COTP) has determined that a safety zone is necessary to
protect the general public from hazards associated with aerial flight
demonstrations.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and persons during the air show on the navigable waters of the
Mississippi Sound in the Biloxi Harbor Channel in Biloxi, MS. The Coast
Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone on
the Mississippi Sound within the positions of 30[deg]23'22.6'' N,
88[deg]50'54.9'' W; 30[deg]23'25.5'' N, 88[deg]53'12.1'' W;
30[deg]22'52.3'' N, 88[deg]50'55.8'' W; 30[deg]22'56.3'' N,
88[deg]53'11.9'' W over the Biloxi Harbor Channel in Biloxi, MS from 9
a.m. through 5 p.m. on July 19, 2018 through July 22, 2018. The
proposed rulemaking is needed to provide for the safety of life and
property on these navigable waters during the 2018 Biloxi Air Show.
This proposed rulemaking restricts transit into, through, and within
the zone unless specifically authorized by the COTP. No vessel or
person would be permitted to enter the zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. A designated
representative may be a Patrol Commander (PATCOM). The PATCOM would be
aboard either a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The PATCOM
may be contacted on Channel 16 VHF-FM (156.8 MHz) by the call sign
``PATCOM''. All persons and vessels not registered with the sponsor as
participants or official patrol vessels are considered spectators. The
``official patrol vessels'' consist of any Coast Guard, state, or local
law enforcement and sponsor provided vessels assigned or approved by
the COTP to patrol the zone.
    Spectator vessels desiring to transit the zone may do so only with
prior approval of the PATCOM and when so directed by that officer would
be operated at a minimum safe navigation speed in a manner which will
not endanger any other vessels. No spectator vessel shall anchor,
block, loiter, or impede the through transit of official patrol vessels
in the zone during the effective dates and times, unless cleared for
entry by or through an official patrol vessel. Any spectator vessel may
anchor outside the zone, but may not anchor in, block, or loiter in a
navigable channel. Spectator vessels may be moored to a waterfront
facility within the zone in such a way that they shall not interfere
with the progress of the air show. Such mooring must be complete at
least 30 minutes prior to the establishment of the zone and remain
moored through the duration of the air show.
    The COTP or a designated representative may forbid and control the
movement of all vessels in the zone. When hailed or signaled by an
official patrol vessel, a vessel shall come to an immediate stop and
comply with the directions given. Failure to do so may result in
expulsion from the zone, citation for failure to comply, or both.
    The COTP or a designated representative may terminate the operation
of any vessel at any time it is deemed necessary for the protection of
life or property. The COTP or a designated representative would
terminate enforcement of the safety zone at the conclusion of the air
show.
    The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this
document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on size, location,
and duration of the proposed rulemaking. The proposed safety zone would
take place on a small area of Mississippi Sound, during a short
duration of only eight hours, lasting for only four days from July 19,
2018 through July 22, 2018. Additionally, the Coast Guard would issue
Broadcast Notices to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the
safety zone so that waterway users may plan accordingly for transits
during this restriction, and the proposed rule also allows vessels to
seek permission from the COTP or a designated representative to enter
the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the
human environment. This rule involves a safety zone on the Mississippi
Sound, within the positions of 30[deg]23'22.6'' N, 88[deg]50'54.9'' W;
30[deg]23'25.5'' N, 88[deg]53'12.1'' W; 30[deg]22'52.3'' N,
88[deg]50'55.8'' W; 30[deg]22'56.3'' N, 88[deg]53'11.9'' W over the
Biloxi Harbor Channel in Biloxi, MS. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental
Consideration (REC) supporting this determination is available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
    We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery
of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1; 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. AddSec.  165.T08-0083 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T08-0083  Safety Zone; Mississippi Sound, Biloxi, MS

    (a) Location. The following area is a proposed safety zone: All
navigable waters of the Mississippi Sound, within the positions of
30[deg]23'22.6'' N, 88[deg]50'54.9'' W; 30[deg]23'25.5'' N,
88[deg]53'12.1'' W; 30[deg]22'52.3'' N, 88[deg]50'55.8'' W;
30[deg]22'56.3'' N, 88[deg]53'11.9'' W over the Biloxi Harbor Channel
in Biloxi, MS.
    (b) Enforcement period. This section is effective from 9 a.m. on
July 19, 2018 through 5 p.m. on July 22, 2018.
    (c) Regulations.
    (1) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec.  165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting through, or exiting from this area is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Mobile
(COTP) or a designated representative. A designated representative may
be a Patrol Commander (PATCOM). The PATCOM will be aboard either a
Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The PATCOM may be
contacted on Channel 16 VHF-FM (156.8 MHz) by the call sign ``PATCOM''.
    (2) All persons and vessels not registered with the event sponsor
as participants or official patrol vessels are considered spectators.
The ``official patrol vessels'' consist of any Coast Guard, state, or
local law enforcement and sponsor provided vessels assigned or approved
by the COTP to patrol the regulated area.
    (3) Spectator vessels desiring to transit the regulated area may do
so only with prior approval of the PATCOM and when so directed by that
officer will be operated at a minimum safe navigation speed in a manner
that will not endanger participants in the zone or any other vessels.

    (4) No spectator vessel shall anchor, block, loiter, or impede the
through transit of participants or official patrol vessels in the
regulated area during the effective dates and times, unless cleared for
entry by or through an official patrol vessel.
    (5) Any spectator vessel may anchor outside the regulated area, but
may not anchor in, block, or loiter in a navigable channel. Spectator
vessels may be moored to a waterfront facility within the regulated
area in such a way that they shall not interfere with the progress of
the event. Such mooring must be complete at least 30 minutes prior to
the establishment of the regulated area and remain moored through the
duration of the event.
    (6) The COTP or a designated representative may forbid and control
the movement of all vessels in the regulated area. When hailed or
signaled by an official patrol vessel, a vessel shall come to an
immediate stop and comply with the directions given. Failure to do so
may result in expulsion from the area, citation for failure to comply,
or both.
    (7) The COTP or a designated representative may terminate the
operation of any vessel at any time it is deemed necessary for the
protection of life or property.
    (8) The COTP or a designated representative can terminate
enforcement of the safety zone at the conclusion of the event.
    (d) Informational broadcasts. The COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public through Broadcast Notices to
Mariners of the enforcement period for the temporary safety zone as
well as any changes in the planned schedule.

    Dated: February 2, 2018
M.R. McLellan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Mobile.
[FR Doc. 2018-04734 Filed 3-8-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: April 29, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 82)]
[Notices]
[Page 22674-22675]
[DOCID:fr29ap10-137]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

Moynihan Station Development Project

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of availability of and public comment period for the
Moynihan Station Development Project Environmental Assessment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Railroad Administration announces the availability
of the Moynihan Station

Development Project (Project) Environmental Assessment (EA) for public
review and comment. The EA was prepared pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq., the Council on Environmental Quality NEPA implementing
regulations, 40 CFR parts 1500-1508, and the FRA NEPA procedures, 64 FR
28545 (May 26, 1999). FRA is the lead Federal agency and the New York
State Urban Development Corporation d/b/a the Empire State Development
Corporation (ESDC) is the lead State agency.
    ESDC, its subsidiary Moynihan Station Development Corporation
(MSDC), and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) have
proposed to redevelop the James A. Farley Building and its Western
Annex into a new intermodal transportation facility, to be called the
Daniel Patrick Moynihan Station (Moynihan Station). Moynihan Station
would be one component of the Project that would also include the
commercial redevelopment of the Western Annex and the construction of a
1.1 million square foot mixed-use building fronting on the east side of
Eight Avenue between West 33rd and West 34th Streets utilizing
development rights associated with the Farley Complex.

DATES: FRA invites interested Members of Congress, state and local
governments, other Federal agencies, Native American tribal
governments, organizations, and members of the public to provide
comments on the EA, which is available at http://
www.empire.state.ny.us/Subsidiaries_Projects/MSDC/MSDC.html or by
request from MSDC at the address listed below under For Further
Information. The 30-day public comment period begins on April 28, 2010
and ends on May 28, 2010. FRA and ESDC will consider all comments
received or postmarked by that date in preparing the Final EA. Comments
received or postmarked after that date will be considered to the extent
practicable.
    On April 28, 2010, ESDC and MSDC, in accordance with the New York
State Urban Development Corporation Act (UDC Act), will be holding a
public hearing to consider the proposed draft March 2010 Phase 1
Amended General Project Plan. The hearing will be held at the James A.
Farley Post Office Building, located at 380 West 33rd Street, Room
4500, New York, New York, 10199 from 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. Although FRA and
ESDC will not be presenting the EA at this hearing and oral comments on
the EA will not be accepted, it is an opportunity for interested
parties to learn more about the Project.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted in writing. Written comments may
be submitted to ESDC and MSDC at 633 Third Avenue, New York, New York
10017, attention: Rebecca Pellegrini. Written comments will also be
accepted at the April 28th public hearing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information regarding the
EA or the Project, please contact: Ms. Rebecca Pellegrini, Moynihan
Station Development Corporation, 633 Third Avenue, New York, New York;
or by e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>with ``Moynihan Station
Development Project'' in the subject heading, or Mr. John Winkle,
Transportation Industry Analyst, Office of Passenger Programs, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Room W38-311,
Washington, DC 20590 (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>), or by e-mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>with ``Moynihan Station Development Project'' in
the subject heading.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    I. Description of Project. The approximately 1.3 million square
foot Farley Complex occupies a ``superblock'' from West 31st to West
33rd Streets and from Eighth Avenue to Ninth Avenue. Built over the
Pennsylvania Station (Penn Station) rail facilities, including the
westernmost portion of most of the passenger platforms and other rail
yard facilities, the Farley Complex is integrated into the larger Penn
Station Complex.
    Penn Station is the busiest transportation facility in the United
States, accommodating over 530,000 daily passengers, including
intercity passengers riding Amtrak, local commuter rail passengers, and
subway riders. It is, however, plagued with design problems. As a
result, it is difficult to navigate and has passenger facilities that
do not meet current industry standards related to safe egress times and
universal accessibility. The station, already operating above its
design capacity, is projected to experience a growing passenger load as
development continues in the surrounding neighborhoods.
    To address the larger issue of inadequate capacity at Penn Station,
ESDC, MSDC and FRA have proposed a program of improvements at the
Farley Building that will relocate Amtrak's intercity passenger rail
operations to a new Moynihan Station to be constructed within the
eastern portion of the Farley Building. This work will significantly
improve access to, and egress from, the platforms and the connections
between Penn Station, the Farley Building, and the existing New York
City subway lines.
    The project as currently envisioned will take place in two phases.
Phase 1 work, which is primarily below street level, will consist of
expanding and extending the existing West End Concourse so that it
spans all existing tracks (with new access to Eighth Avenue), expanding
the existing 33rd Street Connector, adding several platform ventilation
elements, and adding several entrances to the new Moynihan Station.
Phase 2 will consist of development of the Station itself, including
the Train Hall, concourse and street-level portions of the Station,
reactivation of currently-unused Platform 12 for passenger use, and the
non-Station commercial development of the Farley Complex.
    II. Previous Environmental Reviews. The development of plans for
improved New York City passenger facilities has been underway since as
early as 1991 when Amtrak began planning for a new intermodal
transportation facility. The potential availability of the Farley
Complex led to additional efforts to devise plans that incorporated
passenger rail facilities in the Farley Complex. A series of
environmental reviews have accompanied the various proposals for
improvements to the Penn Station facilities and site, including most
recently the final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that was issued
by ESDC under SEQRA in August 2006. That EIS evaluated the impacts of a
larger project that included relocating Madison Square Garden to the
Farley Building and renovating Penn Station itself. Those elements have
subsequently been dropped and this EA addresses the Project as
currently defined.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 23, 2010.
Mark E. Yachmetz,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Development.
[FR Doc. 2010-9843 Filed 4-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 230 (Friday, December 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 83972-83973]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26454]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2021-0005]

LabTest Certification Inc.: Application for Expansion of
Recognition

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this notice, OSHA announces the application of LabTest
Certification Inc., for expansion of the recognition as a Nationally
Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) and presents the agency's
preliminary finding to grant the application.

DATES: Submit comments, information, and documents in response to this
notice, or requests for an extension of time to make a submission, on
or before December 18, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments by any of the following methods:
    Electronically: Submit comments and attachments electronically at
http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal eRulemaking Portal.
Follow the instructions online for making electronic submissions.
    Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office. All
documents in the docket (including this Federal Register notice) are
listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index; however, some
information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly available to
read or download through the website. All submissions, including
copyrighted material, are available for inspection through the OSHA
Docket Office. Contact the OSHA Docket Office at<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY
(877) 889-5627) for assistance in locating docket submissions.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and the
OSHA docket number (OSHA-2021-0005). OSHA places comments and other
materials, including any personal information, in the public docket
without revision, and these materials will be available online at
http://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, the agency cautions commenters
about submitting statements they do not want made available to the
public, or submitting comments that contain personal information
(either about themselves or others) such as Social Security numbers,
birth dates, and medical data.
    Extension of comment period: Submit requests for an extension of
the comment period on or before December 18, 2023 to the Office of
Technical Programs and Coordination Activities, Directorate of
Technical Support and Emergency Management, Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW, Room N-3653, Washington, DC 20210, or by fax to (202) 693-
1644.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information regarding this notice is
available from the following sources:
    Press inquiries: Contact Mr. Frank Meilinger, Director, OSHA Office
of Communications, phone:<PHONE_NUMBER> or email:
[email protected].
    General and technical information: Contact Mr. Kevin Robinson,
Director, Office of Technical Programs and Coordination Activities,
Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration, phone:<PHONE_NUMBER> or email:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Notice of the Application for Expansion

    OSHA is providing notice that LabTest Certification Inc. (LCI), is
applying for expansion of the current recognition as a NRTL. LCI
requests the addition of nine test standards to the NRTL scope of
recognition.
    OSHA recognition of a NRTL signifies that the organization meets
the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.7. Recognition is an
acknowledgment that the organization can perform independent safety
testing and certification of the specific products covered within the
scope of recognition. Each NRTL's scope of recognition includes: (1)
the type of products the NRTL may test, with each type specified by the
applicable test standard; and (2) the recognized site(s) that has/have
the technical capability to perform the product-testing and product-
certification activities for test standards within the NRTL's scope.
Recognition is not a delegation or grant of government authority;
however, recognition enables employers to use products approved by the
NRTL to meet OSHA standards that require product testing and
certification.
    The agency processes applications by a NRTL for initial recognition
and for an expansion or renewal of this recognition, following
requirements in Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.7. This appendix requires
that the agency publish two notices in the Federal Register in
processing an application. In the first notice, OSHA announces the
application and provides a preliminary finding. In the second notice,
the agency provides a final decision on the application. These notices
set forth the NRTL's scope of recognition or modifications of that
scope. OSHA maintains an informational web page for each NRTL,
including LCI, which details the NRTL's scope of recognition. These
pages are available from the OSHA website at http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/index.html.
    LCI currently has one facility (site) recognized by OSHA for
product testing and certification, with the headquarters located at:
LabTest Certification, Inc., 205--8291 92 Street, Delta, BC Canada V4G
0A4. A complete list of LCI's scope of recognition is available at
https://www.osha.gov/nationally-recognized-testing-laboratory-program/lci.

II. General Background on the Application

    LCI submitted an application dated March 8, 2022 (OSHA-2021-0005-
0003), requesting the addition of ten test standards to the NRTL scope
of

recognition. That application was updated on June 26, 2023 (OSHA-2021-
0005-0004), to remove one standard from the original submission. This
expansion will cover the remaining nine standards. OSHA staff performed
a detailed analysis of the application packet and reviewed other
pertinent information. OSHA did not perform any on-site reviews in
relation to this application.
    Table 1, below, lists the appropriate test standards found in LCI's
application for expansion for testing and certification of products
under the NRTL Program.

Table 1--Proposed Appropriate Test Standards for Inclusion in LCI's NRTL
                          Scope of Recognition
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Test standard                     Test standard title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
UL 48.............................  Electric Signs.
UL 508............................  Electric Industrial Control
                                     Equipment.
UL 508A...........................  Industrial Control Panels.
UL 61010-1........................  Electrical Equipment for
                                     Measurement, Control and Laboratory
                                     Use; Part 1: General Requirements.
UL 62368-1........................  Audio/Video, Information and
                                     Communication Technology Equipment--
                                     Part 1: Safety Requirements.
UL 8750...........................  Standard for Light Emitting Diode
                                     (LED) Equipment for Use in Lighting
                                     Products.
NFPA 496..........................  Purged and Pressurized Enclosures
                                     for Electrical Equipment.
UL 1203...........................  Explosion-Proof and Dust-Ignition-
                                     Proof Electrical Equipment for Use
                                     in Hazardous (Classified)
                                     Locations.
UL 121201.........................  Nonincendive Electrical Equipment
                                     for Use in Class I and II, Division
                                     2 and Class III, Divisions 1 and 2
                                     Hazardous (Classified) Locations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Preliminary Findings on the Application

    LCI submitted an acceptable application for expansion of the scope
of recognition. OSHA's review of the application files and pertinent
documentation indicates that LCI can meet the requirements prescribed
by 29 CFR 1910.7 for expanding the recognition to include the addition
of these nine test standards for NRTL testing and certification listed
in Table 1. This preliminary finding does not constitute an interim or
temporary approval of LCI's application.
    OSHA seeks comment on this preliminary determination.

IV. Public Participation

    OSHA welcomes public comment as to whether LCI meets the
requirements of 29 CFR 1910.7 for expansion of recognition as a NRTL.
Comments should consist of pertinent written documents and exhibits.
    Commenters needing more time to comment must submit a request in
writing, stating the reasons for the request by the due date for
comments. OSHA will limit any extension to 10 days unless the requester
justifies a longer time period. OSHA may deny a request for an
extension if it is not adequately justified.
    To review copies of the exhibits identified in this notice, as well
as comments submitted to the docket, contact the Docket Office,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor. These materials also are generally available online at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. OSHA-2021-0005 (for further
information, see the ``Docket'' heading in the section of this notice
titled ADDRESSES).
    OSHA staff will review all comments to the docket submitted in a
timely manner. After addressing the issues raised by these comments,
staff will make a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary of Labor
for Occupational Safety and Health on whether to grant LCI's
application for expansion of the scope of recognition. The Assistant
Secretary will make the final decision on granting the application. In
making this decision, the Assistant Secretary may undertake other
proceedings prescribed in Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.7.
    OSHA will publish a public notice of the final decision in the
Federal Register.

V. Authority and Signature

    James S. Frederick, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, authorized the preparation of this
notice. Accordingly, the agency is issuing this notice pursuant to 29
U.S.C. 657(g)(2), Secretary of Labor's Order No. 8-2020 (85 FR 58393,
Sept. 18, 2020), and 29 CFR 1910.7.

    Signed at Washington, DC.
James S. Frederick
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2023-26454 Filed 11-30-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3751-3752]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1467]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RD11-10-000]

Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-725A); Comment
Request; Submitted for OMB Review

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of section 3507(a)(1) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1), the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC) has submitted the
information collection described below to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review. Any interested person may file comments
directly with OMB and should address a copy of those comments to the
Commission as explained below. In compliance with section 3506 of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, the Commission previously issued a Notice in
the Federal Register (76 FR 65504, 10/21/2011) requesting public
comments. FERC received no comments on FERC-725A and has made this
notation in its submission to OMB.

DATES: Comments in consideration of the collection of information are
due February 24, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Comments, identified by docket number, may be filed in the
following ways:
     Electronic Filing through http://www.ferc.gov. Documents
created electronically using word processing software should be filed
in native applications or print-to-PDF format and not in a scanned
format.
     Mail/Hand Delivery: Those unable to file electronically
may mail or hand-deliver an original of their comments to: Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Brown may be reached by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, and fax at (202)
273-0873.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed information collection in
Docket No. RD11-10-000 relates to Reliability Standard, FAC-008-3--
Facility Ratings, developed by the North American Electric Reliability
Corporation (NERC) and approved by the Commission in an order dated
November 17, 2011, with a January 1, 2013 effective date for the
mandatory compliance with the revised Reliability Standard.\1\
Reliability Standard FAC-008-3 modifies the currently effective version
Reliability Standard FAC-008-1 and subsumes Reliability Standard FAC-
009-1. Concurrent with the effective date of FAC-008-3, Reliability
Standards FAC-008-1 and FAC-009-1 will be retired. The information
collection requirements contained in Reliability Standards FAC-008 and
FAC-009 are contained in FERC-725A (OMB Control Number 1902-0244).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ North American Electric Reliability Corp., 137 FERC ] 61,123
(2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    There is a net increase in information collection and reporting
that will result from implementing Reliability Standard FAC-008-3 and
retiring the two superseded Reliability Standards. The breakdown is as
follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    Additional reporting beyond FAC-008-1    Additional recordkeeping  beyond FAC-008-1
              FAC-008-3                        Applies to:                       and FAC-009-1                             and  FAC-009-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R1..................................  Generator owners............  None, this requirement is derived      Retention period increased by 2 years.
                                                                     from R1 of FAC-008-1.
R2..................................  Generator owners............  None, this requirement is derived      Retention period increased by 2 years.
                                                                     from R1 of FAC-008-1.
R3..................................  Transmission owners.........  None, this requirement is derived      Retention period increased by 2 years.
                                                                     from R1 of FAC-008-1.
R4..................................  Generator owners and          None, this requirement is derived      Retention period increased by 2 years.
                                       Transmission owners.          from R2 of FAC-008-1.
R5..................................  Generator owners and          None, this requirement is derived      Retention period increased by 2 years.
                                       Transmission owners.          from R3 of FAC-008-1.
R6..................................  Generator owners and          None, this requirement is derived      Retention period increased by 2 years.
                                       Transmission owners.          from R1 of FAC-008-1.
R7..................................  Generator owners............  None, this requirement is derived      Retention period increased by 2 years.
                                                                     from R2 of FAC-008-1.
R8..................................  Generator owners that are     Newly added reporting of the next      New retention period of 3 years.
                                       subject to R2 and             most limiting equipment and the
                                       Transmission owners.          thermal rating for the next most
                                                                     limiting equipment.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this proposed
collection is estimated as:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         Number of  respondents
                                         per compliance registry     Number of       Hours per     Total annual
  Additional proposed burden in FERC-     summary as of  August    responses per    respondent         hours
                 725A                           29, 2011            respondent     per response
                                        (A).....................             (B)             (C)    ( A x B x C)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Report the next most limiting           \2\ 83 Generator owners.               1              80           6,640
 equipment and the thermal rating for
 the next most limiting equipment.
Report the next most limiting           342 Transmission owners.               1          \3\ 20           6,840
 equipment and the thermal rating for
 the next most limiting equipment.
Increase in retention time by 2 years   833 Generator owners....               1               2           1,666
 for R1 through R7.
Increase in retention time by 2 years   342 Transmission owners.               1               2             684
 for R1 through R7.
Compliance sub-total..................  ........................  ..............  ..............          13,480
Recordkeeping sub-total...............  ........................  ..............  ..............           2,350
                                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.............................  ........................  ..............  ..............          15,830
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated cost burden to respondents is $1,683,400; [i.e., (13,480
hours @ $120 an hour (compliance cost)) + (2,350 hours @ $28 an hour
(recordkeeping cost))]. The reporting burden includes the total time,
effort, or financial resources expended to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide the information including: (1) Reviewing
instructions, (2) developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating,
verifying, processing, maintaining, disclosing and providing
information, (3) adjusting the existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and requirements, (4) training
personnel to respond to a collection of information, (5) searching data
sources, (6) completing and reviewing the collection of information,
and (7) transmitting, or otherwise disclosing the information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Requirement R8 applies to generator owners that own
facilities between the step-up transformer and the point of
interconnection. We estimate that 10% of all NERC registered
generator owners own such facilities.
    \3\ Transmission Owner estimate based on the supplemental work
required to report the next most limiting equipment and assumes all
prerequisite work was performed in compliance with currently
effective Reliability Standard FAC-008-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The estimate of cost for respondents is based upon salaries for
professional and clerical support, as well as direct and indirect
overhead costs. Direct costs include all costs directly attributable to
providing this information, such as administrative costs and the cost
for information technology. Indirect or overhead costs are costs
incurred by an organization in support of its mission. These costs
apply to activities which benefit the whole organization rather than
any particular function or activity.

    Dated: January 18, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-1467 Filed 1-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 134 (Friday, July 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45199-45200]
[FR Doc No: 2023-14991]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14787-004]

Black Canyon Hydro, LLC; Notice of Revised Schedule for the
Seminoe Pumped Storage Project

    This notice revises the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's
(Commission) schedule for processing Black Canyon Hydro, LLC's license
application for the

Seminoe Pumped Storage Project. A prior notice issued on March 31,
2023, identified an anticipated schedule for issuance of draft and
final National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents and a final
order for the project. After the issuance of that notice, Black Canyon
Hydro, LLC agreed to conduct additional studies requested by the
agencies and file the study results by ``November 2023,'' and
Commission staff issued a letter requiring the corresponding study
reports and additional information to be filed with the Commission by
November 30, 2023. To account for the additional time needed for Black
Canyon Hydro, LLC to complete the studies and file the additional
information, the application will be processed according to the
following revised schedule.

Notice of Ready for Environmental Analysis: February 2024
Draft NEPA Document: October 2024
Final NEPA Document: May 9, 2025

    In addition, in accordance with Title 41 of the Fixing America's
Surface Transportation Act, enacted on December 4, 2015, agencies are
to publish completion dates for all federal environmental reviews and
authorizations. This notice identifies the Commission's anticipated
schedule for issuance of the final order for the project, which is
based on the revised issuance date for the final NEPA document.
Accordingly, we currently anticipate issuing a final order for the
project no later than:

Issuance of Final Order: September 18, 2025

    If a schedule change becomes necessary, an additional notice will
be provided so that interested parties and government agencies are kept
informed of the project's progress.

    Dated: July 10, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-14991 Filed 7-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37903-37904]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15370]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0052; FRL-9518-4]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Risk Management Program
Requirements and Petitions To Modify the List of Regulated Substances
Under Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information
Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an
existing approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below,
describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated
burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before July 25, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2003-0052, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA Docket
Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail code: 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB by mail to:
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sicy Jacob, Office of Emergency
Management, Mail code 5104A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 202-564-
8019; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On February 16, 2012 (77 FR 9237), EPA sought comments on this
ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any
additional comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB
within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0052, which is available for online viewing at
www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Air Docket in the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the Air Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at
www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in
the docket that are available electronically. Once in the system,
select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified
above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public
viewing at www.regulations.gov as EPA receives them and without change,
unless the comment contains copyrighted material, confidential business
information (CBI), or other information whose public disclosure is
restricted by statute. For further information about the electronic
docket, go to www.regulations.gov.
    Title: Risk Management Program Requirements and Petitions to Modify
the List of Regulated Substances under Section 112(r) of the Clean Air
Act (Renewal).
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1656.14, OMB Control No. 2050-0144.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on July 31, 2012. Under
OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the
collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: The 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments added section
112(r) to provide for the prevention and mitigation of accidental
releases. Section 112(r) mandates that EPA promulgate a list of
``regulated substances'' with threshold quantities and establish
procedures for the addition and deletion of substances from the list of
regulated substances. Processes at stationary sources that contain more
than a threshold quantity of a regulated substance are subject to
accidental release prevention regulations promulgated under CAA section
112(r)(7). These two rules are codified as 40 CFR part 68. Part 68
requires that sources with more than a threshold quantity of a
regulated substance in a process develop and implement a risk
management program and submit a risk management plan to EPA. The
compliance schedule for the Part 68 requirements, established by rule
on June 20, 1996, requires the implementation of the source risk
management programs and the submission of initial Risk Management Plan
(RMP)'s by June 21, 1999, and at least every five years after the
initial submission. Sources must resubmit earlier than their next five-
year deadline if they undergo certain changes to their covered
processes as specified in Part 68. Therefore, after the initial
submission, some sources re-submitted their RMPs prior to the next 5-
year deadline because they had process changes that required an earlier
update. These sources were then assigned a new five-year resubmission
deadline based on the date of their revised plan submission. Most
covered sources had no significant changes to their covered processes
and therefore resubmitted their updated RMP on June 21, 2004. This same
pattern continued through the next submission cycle--some sources
updated and resubmitted their RMP prior to their next five-year
deadline and were assigned a new (off-cycle) five-year deadline, but a
majority of sources submitted their updated RMP on or near the next
scheduled five-year resubmission deadline (June 2009). Similarly, while
most sources' next submission is due in June 2014, because of off-cycle
resubmission deadlines assigned to sources who have resubmitted RMPs
prior to their next 5-year resubmission date, only a portion of the
RMP-regulated universe has a submission deadline of June 21, 2014.
    Other than the costs for gathering information and filling out the
on-line RMP form, the regulations require sources to maintain on-site
documentation, perform a compliance audit every three years, provide
refresher training to employees, perform a hazard analysis at least
every five years, etc. Some of these activities are expected to occur
annually or are on-going. Some are required every three years or every
five years, unless there

are changes at the facility. Therefore, the burden and costs incurred
by sources vary from ICR to ICR. The five-year resubmission deadline
set by the regulations or assigned by EPA based on the latest RMP
resubmission also will cause the burden to vary from ICR to ICR.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 18
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Chemical manufacturers, petroleum
refineries, water treatment systems, non-chemical manufacturers,
states.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 13,558 facility respondents and 15
implementing agencies.
    Frequency of Response: Every five years, unless the facilities need
to update their previous submission.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 80,546.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $6,736,212 in labor costs. There are
no capital or O&M costs associated with this ICR.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of 13,436 hours for
all sources and states from the previous ICR. The burden varies from
ICR to ICR due to different resubmission deadlines based on the
sources' RMP re-submission deadline and other regulatory deadlines.
Therefore, the burden changes each year depending on how many sources
have to submit their RMP and comply with certain prevention program
requirements. The number of sources subject to the regulations
fluctuates regularly, and is lower than in the previous ICR (13,718
sources in the previous ICR vs. 13,558 in this ICR period).

John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-15370 Filed 6-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 10, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31883-31886]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14707]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0178]
RIN 1625-AA08

Special Local Regulation; Choptank River, Cambridge, MD

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing special local regulations for
certain waters of the Choptank River. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety of life on the navigable waters located in
Cambridge, MD, during a power boat racing event on July 28, 2018, and
July 29, 2018. This regulation prohibits persons and vessels from
entering the regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region or the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander.

DATES: This rule is effective from 8:30 a.m. on July 28, 2018 through
6:30 p.m. on July 29, 2018.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2018-0178 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Ronald Houck, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-
National Capital Region; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On February 18, 2018, The Kent Narrows Racing Association of
Chester, MD, notified the Coast Guard that from 10 a.m. until 6 p.m. on
July 28, 2018, and July 29, 2018, it will be conducting power boat
races in the Choptank River in a cove located between Hambrooks Bar and
the shoreline at Cambridge, MD. Details of the proposed event were
provided to the Coast Guard at a meeting on April 10, 2018, where the
sponsor changed the start time to 9 a.m. to allow for additional races.
In response, on May 21, 2018, the Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) entitled ``Special Local Regulation;
Choptank River, Cambridge, MD'' (83 FR 23395). There we stated why we
issued the NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action
related to this high-speed power boat racing event. During the comment
period that ended June 20, 2018, we received no comments.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Due to the date of the event, it
would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest to make the
regulation effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
The regulation must be in place by June 28th in order to protect the
public from the hazards associated with this power boat racing event.
Therefore, the Coast Guard is making this rule effective immediately.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1233. The Captain of the Port (COTP) Maryland-National Capital Region
has determined that potential hazards associated with the power boat
racing event will be a safety concern for anyone intending to
participate in this event or for vessels that operate within specified
waters of the Choptank River at Cambridge, MD. The purpose of this rule
is to protect marine event participants, spectators and transiting
vessels on specified waters of the Choptank River before, during, and
after the scheduled event.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule

    As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM published May
21, 2018. There are no substantive changes in the regulatory text of
this rule from the proposed rule in the NPRM.
    This rule establishes a special local regulation to be enforced
from 8:30 a.m. until 6:30 p.m. on July 28, 2018 and July 29, 2018. The
regulated area covers all navigable waters of the Choptank River and
Hambrooks Bay bounded by a line connecting the following coordinates:
Commencing at the shoreline at Long Wharf Park, Cambridge, MD, at
position latitude 38[deg]34'30'' N, longitude 076[deg]04'16'' W; thence
east to latitude 38[deg]34'20'' N, longitude 076[deg]03'46'' W; thence
north across the Choptank River along the Senator Frederick C. Malkus,
Jr. (US-50) Memorial Bridge, at mile 15.5, to latitude 38[deg]35'30''
N, longitude 076[deg]02'52'' W; thence west along the shoreline to
latitude 38[deg]35'38'' N, longitude 076[deg]03'09'' W; thence north
and west along the shoreline to latitude 38[deg]36'42'' N, longitude
076[deg]04'15'' W; thence southwest across the Choptank River to
latitude 38[deg]35'31'' N, longitude 076[deg]04'57'' W terminating at
the Hambrooks Bay breakwall. This rule provides additional information
about designated areas within the regulated area, including a ``Race
Area,'' ``Spectator Area'' and ``Buffer Zone,'' and the restrictions
that apply to mariners. The duration and enforcement of the regulated
area is intended to insure the safety of vessels and these navigable
waters before, during, and after the scheduled 9 a.m. through 6 p.m.
high-speed power boat racing event. Persons and vessels desiring to
transit, moor, or anchor within the regulated area must obtain
authorization from COTP Maryland-National Capital Region or Coast Guard
Patrol

Commander (PATCOM). When authorized to transit the regulated area, all
vessels must proceed at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe
course that minimizes wake near the race course.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, location
and duration of the regulated area. Vessel traffic will be able to
safely transit through the regulated area, which will impact a small
designated area of the Choptank River for 20 hours. The Coast Guard
will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via marine band radio VHF-FM
channel 16 about the status of the regulated area. Moreover, the rule
allows vessel operators to request permission to enter, remain within,
or transit through the regulated area for the purpose of either safely
entering the ``Spectator Area'' or transiting the regulated area at the
minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course that minimizes wake
near the race course, and if deemed safe to do so by the PATCOM.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves
a special local regulation lasting for 20 hours. This category of
marine event water activities includes but is not limited to sail boat
regattas, boat parades, power boat racing, swimming events, crew
racing, canoe and sail board racing. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L61 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Memorandum for Record for
Categorically Excluded Actions supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; 33 CFR 1.05-1.

0
2. Add Sec.  100.501-T05-0178 to read as follows:

Sec.  100.501-T05-0178   Special Local Regulation; Choptank River,
Cambridge, MD.

    (a) Definitions. (1) Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital
Region means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National
Capital Region or a Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port to act on his
behalf.
    (2) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
    (3) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region with a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast
Guard ensign.
    (4) Spectator means any person or vessel not registered with the
event sponsor as a participant or an official patrol vessel.
    (5) Participant means all persons and vessels registered with the
event sponsor as participating in the Thunder on the Choptank event or
otherwise designated by event sponsor as having a function tied to the
event.
    (b) Regulated area. All coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.
    (1) Coordinates. The following location is a regulated area: All
navigable waters within the Choptank River and Hambrooks Bay bounded by
a line connecting the following coordinates: Commencing at the
shoreline at Long Wharf Park, Cambridge, MD, at position latitude
38[deg]34'30'' N, longitude 076[deg]04'16'' W; thence east to latitude
38[deg]34'20'' N, longitude 076[deg]03'46'' W; thence north across the
Choptank River along the Senator Frederick C. Malkus, Jr. (US-50)
Memorial Bridge, at mile 15.5, to latitude 38[deg]35'30'' N, longitude
076[deg]02'52'' W; thence west along the shoreline to latitude
38[deg]35'38'' N, longitude 076[deg]03'09'' W; thence north and west
along the shoreline to latitude 38[deg]36'42'' N, longitude
076[deg]04'15'' W; thence southwest across the Choptank River to
latitude 38[deg]35'31'' N, longitude 076[deg]04'57'' W terminating at
the Hambrooks Bay breakwall.
    (2) Race area. Located within the waters of Hambrooks Bay and
Choptank River, between Hambrooks Bar and Great Marsh Point, MD.
    (3) Buffer zone. All waters within Hambrooks Bay and Choptank River
(with the exception of the Race Area designated by the marine event
sponsor) bound to the north by the breakwall and continuing along a
line drawn from the east end of breakwall located at latitude
38[deg]35'27.6'' N, longitude 076[deg]04'50.1'' W, thence southeast to
latitude 38[deg]35'17.7'' N, longitude 076[deg]04'29'' W, thence south
to latitude 38[deg]35'01'' N, longitude 076[deg]04'29'' W, thence west
to the shoreline at latitude 38[deg]35'01'' N, longitude
076[deg]04'41.3'' W.
    (4) Spectator area. All waters of the Choptank River, eastward and
outside of Hambrooks Bay breakwall, bounded by line that commences at
latitude 38[deg]35'27.6'' N, longitude 076[deg]04'50.1'' W, thence
northeast to latitude 38[deg]35'30'' N, longitude 076[deg]04'47'' W,
thence southeast to latitude 38[deg]35'23'' N, longitude
076[deg]04'29'' W, thence southwest to latitude 38[deg]35'19'' N,
longitude 076[deg]04'31'' W, thence northwest to and terminating at the
point of origin.
    (c) Special local regulations. (1) The Captain of the Port
Maryland-National Capital Region or the Coast Guard Patrol Commander
may forbid and control the movement of all vessels and persons,
including event participants, in the regulated area. When hailed or
signaled by an official patrol, a vessel or person in the regulated
area shall immediately comply with the directions given. Failure to do
so may result in expulsion from the area, citation for failure to
comply, or both.
    (2) The operator of any vessel in the regulated area shall:
    (i) Stop the vessel immediately when directed to do so by any
Official Patrol and then proceed only as directed.
    (ii) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Official Patrol.
    (iii) When authorized to transit the regulated area, all vessels
shall proceed at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course
that minimizes wake near the race course.
    (3) The Coast Guard Patrol Commander may terminate the event, or
the operation of any participant, at any time it is deemed necessary
for the protection of life or property.
    (4) The Race Area is an area within the regulated area defined in
paragraph (b)(2) of this section. The actual placement of the race
course will be determined by the marine event sponsor but must be
located within the designated boundaries of the Race Area. Only
participants and official patrol vessels are allowed to enter the Race
Area.
    (5) The Buffer Zone is an area that surrounds the perimeter of the
Race Area within the regulated area defined in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section. The purpose of a Buffer Zone is to minimize potential
collision conflicts with participants and spectators or nearby
transiting vessels. This area provides separation between the Race Area
and Spectator Area or other vessels that are operating in the vicinity
of the regulated area defined in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. Only
participants and official patrol vessels are allowed to enter the
Buffer Zone.
    (6) The Spectator Area is an area described by a line bounded by
coordinates provided in latitude and longitude that outlines the
boundary of a spectator area within the regulated area defined in
paragraph (b)(4) of this section. All vessels within the Spectator Area
shall be anchored or operate at a no-wake speed while transiting within
the Spectator Area.
    (7) The Coast Guard Patrol Commander and official patrol vessels
enforcing this regulated area can be contacted on marine band radio
VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz) and channel 22A (157.1 MHz). Persons and
vessels desiring to transit, moor, or anchor within the regulated area
must obtain authorization from Captain of the Port Maryland-National
Capital Region or Coast Guard Patrol Commander. The Captain of the Port
Maryland-National Capital Region can be contacted at telephone number
410-576-2693 or on Marine Band Radio, VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
The Coast Guard Patrol Commander can be contacted on Marine Band Radio,
VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
    (8) The Coast Guard will publish a notice in the Fifth Coast Guard
District Local Notice to Mariners and issue a marine information
broadcast on VHF-FM marine band radio.
    (d) Enforcement. The Coast Guard may be assisted with marine event
patrol and enforcement of the regulated area by other Federal, State,
and local agencies.
    (e) Enforcement periods. This section will be enforced from 8:30
a.m. until 6:30 p.m. on July 28, 2018, and from

8:30 a.m. until 6:30 p.m. on July 29, 2018.

    Dated: July 3, 2018.
Joseph B. Loring,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Maryland-National
Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2018-14707 Filed 7-9-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P