[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 230 (Friday, December 3, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68571-68573]
[FR Doc No: 2021-26260]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 230 / Friday, December 3, 2021 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2021-1047; Airspace Docket No. 21-ASW-23]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment of Class D Airspace and Class E Airspace; Fort
Worth and Dallas-Fort Worth, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend the Class D airspace at Fort
Worth, TX, and the Class E airspace at Dallas-Fort Worth, TX. The FAA
is proposing this action as the result of an airspace review due to the
cancellation of the instrument procedures and implementation on new
instrument procedures at Granbury Regional Airport, Granbury, TX,
contained within the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX, Class E airspace legal
description. The geographic coordinates of the Fort Worth Spinks
Airport, Fort Worth, TX, would also be updated to coincide with the
FAA's aeronautical database.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 18, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone
(202) 366-9826, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2021-1047/Airspace Docket No. 21-ASW-23, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at https://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in
the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. FAA Order JO 7400.11 is also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of FAA Order JO 7400.11F at NARA, email:
[email protected] or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend the Class D airspace at Fort Worth Spinks Airport,
Fort Worth, TX, and the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at Granbury Regional Airport, Granbury, TX, contained
within the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX, airspace legal description, to
support instrument flight rule operations at these airports.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2021-1047/
Airspace Docket No. 21-ASW-23.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Federal Aviation Administration, Air Traffic
Organization, Central Service Center, Operations Support Group, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10, 2021, and effective
September 15, 2021. FAA Order JO

7400.11F is publicly available as listed in the ADDRESSES section of
this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F lists Class A, B, C, D, and E
airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 by:
    Amending the Class D airspace at Fort Worth Spinks Airport, Fort
Worth, TX, by updating the geographic coordinates of the airport to
coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database;
    And amending the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface within an 8.8-mile (increased from a 6.3-mile) radius
of Granbury Regional Airport, Granbury, TX, contained within the
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX, airspace legal description; and updating the
geographic coordinates of Fort Worth Spinks Airport, Fort Worth, TX,
also contained within the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX airspace legal
description, to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database.
    This action is necessary due to an airspace review due to the
cancellation of the instrument procedures and implementation of new
instrument procedures at Granbury Regional Airport.
    Class D and E airspace designations are published in paragraphs
5000 and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order JO 7400.11F, dated August 10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, which is incorporated by
reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and E airspace designations
listed in this document will be published subsequently in FAA Order JO
7400.11.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

ASW TX D Fort Worth, TX [Amended]

Fort Worth Spinks Airport, TX
    (Lat. 32[deg]33'54'' N, long. 97[deg]18'30'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface up to but not
including 3,000 feet MSL within a 4.1-mile radius of Fort Worth
Spinks Airport, and within 1 mile each side of the 173[deg] bearing
from the airport extending from the 4.1-mile radius to 4.8 miles
south of the airport. This Class D airspace area is effective during
the specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective dates and times will thereafter be
continuously published in the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASW TX E5 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX [Amended]

Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, TX
    (Lat. 32[deg]53'50'' N, long. 97[deg]02'16'' W)
McKinney National Airport, TX
    (Lat. 33[deg]10'37'' N, long. 96[deg]35'20'' W)
Ralph M. Hall/Rockwall Municipal Airport, TX
    (Lat. 32[deg]55'50'' N, long. 96[deg]26'08'' W)
Mesquite Metro Airport, TX
    (Lat. 32[deg]44'49'' N, long. 96[deg]31'50'' W)
Mesquite Metro: RWY 18-LOC
    (Lat. 32[deg]44'03'' N, long. 96[deg]31'50'' W)
Lancaster Regional Airport, TX
    (Lat. 32[deg]34'39'' N, long. 96[deg]43'03'' W)
Point of Origin
    (Lat. 32[deg]51'57'' N, long. 97[deg]01'41'' W)
Fort Worth Spinks Airport, TX
    (Lat. 32[deg]33'54'' N, long. 97[deg]18'30'' W)
Cleburne Regional Airport, TX
    (Lat. 32[deg]21'14'' N, long. 97[deg]26'02'' W)
Bourland Field, TX
    (Lat. 32[deg]34'55'' N, long. 97[deg]35'27'' W)
Granbury Regional Airport, TX
    (Lat. 32[deg]26'40'' N, long. 97[deg]49'01'' W)
Parker County Airport, TX
    (Lat. 32[deg]44'47'' N, long. 97[deg]40'57'' W)
Bridgeport Municipal Airport, TX
    (Lat. 33[deg]10'26'' N, long. 97[deg]49'42'' W)
Decatur Municipal Airport, TX
    (Lat. 33[deg]15'15'' N, long. 97[deg]34'50'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 30-mile radius of Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport,
and within a 6.6-mile radius of McKinney National Airport, and
within 1.8 miles each side of the 002[deg] bearing from McKinney
National Airport extending from the 6.6-mile radius to 9.2 miles
north of the airport, and within a 6.3-mile radius of Ralph M. Hall/
Rockwall Municipal Airport, and within 1.6 miles each side of the
010[deg] bearing from Ralph M. Hall/Rockwall Municipal Airport
extending from the 6.3-mile radius to 10.8 miles north of the
airport, and within a 6.5-mile radius of Mesquite Metro Airport, and
within 4 miles west and 7.9 miles east of the 001[deg] bearing from
the Mesquite Metro: RWY 18-LOC extending from the 6.5-mile radius of
the Mesquite Metro Airport to 10 miles north of the Mesquite Metro:
RWY 18-LOC, and within a 6.6-mile radius of Lancaster Regional
Airport, and within 1.9 miles each side of the 140[deg] bearing from
Lancaster Regional Airport extending from the 6.6-mile radius to 9.2
miles southeast of the airport, and within 8 miles northeast and 4
miles southwest of the 144[deg] bearing from the Point of Origin
extending from the 30-mile radius of Dallas-Fort Worth International
Airport to 35 miles southeast of the Point of Origin, and within a
6.5-mile radius of Fort Worth Spinks Airport, and within 8 miles
east and 4 miles west of the 178[deg] bearing from Fort Worth Spinks
Airport extending from the 6.5-mile radius to 21 miles south of the
airport, and within a 6.9-mile radius of Cleburne Regional Airport,
and within 3.6 miles each side of the 292[deg] bearing from the
Cleburne Regional Airport extending from the 6.9-mile radius to 12.2
miles northwest of airport, and within a 6.5-mile radius of Bourland
Field, and within a 8.8-mile radius of Granbury Regional Airport,
and within a 6.3-mile radius of Parker County Airport, and within 8
miles east and 4 miles west of the 177[deg] bearing from Parker
County Airport extending from the 6.3-mile radius to 21.4 miles
south of the airport, and within a 6.3-mile radius of Bridgeport
Municipal Airport, and within 1.6 miles each side of the 040[deg]
bearing from Bridgeport Municipal Airport

extending from the 6.3-mile radius to 10.6 miles northeast of the
airport, and within 4 miles each side of the 001[deg] bearing from
Bridgeport Municipal Airport extending from the 6.3-mile radius to
10.7 miles north of the airport, and within a 6.3-mile radius of
Decatur Municipal Airport, and within 1.5 miles each side of the
263[deg] bearing from Decatur Municipal Airport extending from the
6.3-mile radius to 9.2 miles west of the airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on November 30, 2021.
Martin A. Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2021-26260 Filed 12-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 11530]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4436]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL10-3-001]

Citizens Sunrise Transmission LLC; Citizens Energy Corporation;
Notice of Initiation of Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

    On February 21, 2012, the Commission issued an order that initiated
a proceeding in Docket No. EL10-3-001, pursuant to section 206 of the
Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2006), to determine the
justness and reasonableness of the rates proposed by Citizens Sunrise.
Citizens Sunrise Transmission LLC and Citizens Energy Corporation, 138
FERC ] 61,129 (2012).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL10-3-001, established
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication
of this notice in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 21, 2012.
 Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
 Deputy Secretary
[FR Doc. 2012-4436 Filed 2-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


<EPA BIOPESTICIDES AND POLLUTION PREVENTION DIVISION COMPANY NOTICE OF FILING FOR PESTICIDE PETITIONS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER

<EPA Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division contact: [Sheryl Reilly,<PHONE_NUMBER>]>

<INSTRUCTIONS:  Please utilize this outline in preparing the pesticide petition.  In cases where the outline element does not apply, please insert "NA-Remove" and maintain the outline. Please do not change the margins, font, or format in your pesticide petition. Simply replace the instructions that appear in green, i.e., "[insert company name]," with the information specific to your action.>

<SUBMISSION: E-mail the completed template to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
<TEMPLATE:>

<[bio-ferm GmbH]>

<[Insert petition number]>

<	EPA has received a pesticide petition ([insert petition number]) from [bio-ferm GmbH], [Konrad Lorenz Str. 20, Tulln, 3430, Austria] proposing, pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part 180.>

<(Options (pick one)>

<	2. to establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for>

<(Options (pick one)>

   	1. microbial pesticide  [Aureobasidium pullulans strains DSM 14940 and DSM 14941]

<	Pursuant to section 408(d)(2)(A)(i) of  FFDCA, as amended, [bio-ferm GmbH] has submitted the following summary of information, data, and arguments in support of their pesticide petition. This summary was prepared by [SciReg, Inc.] and EPA has not fully evaluated the merits of the pesticide petition. The summary may have been edited by EPA if the terminology used was unclear, the summary contained extraneous material, or the summary unintentionally made the reader conclude that the findings reflected EPA's position and not the position of the petitioner.>

<I. [bio-ferm GmbH]  Petition Summary>

   	[9F7623]

<A. Product Name and Proposed Use Practices>

<	[Two end-use materials containing equal parts of Aureobasidium pullulans strains DSM 14940 and DSM 14941 are being submitted to EPA for registration. Blossom Protect will be applied to pome fruit only during the blossoming period to protect plants against bacterial fire blight. Botector will be applied pre-harvest to grapes, pome fruit, stone fruit, and strawberries, and post-harvest to citrus to protect these crops against fruit rot diseases caused by Botrytis sp., Monilia sp., Penicillium sp., Nectria sp., and Pezicula sp. Application rates are projected to be up to 1.4 lbs/acre pre-bloom, as a 1% spray solution post-bloom, or as a 0.03% treatment post-harvest.]>

<B. Product Identity/Chemistry>

<	1. Identity of the pesticide and corresponding residues. [Both strains, DSM 14940 and DSM 14941, were isolated from apple leaves and classified as Aureobasidium pullulans by the German Strain Collection for Microorganisms (DSMZ). For this organism, no sexual reproduction is known. Aureobasidium is classified into the phylum Ascomycota. Based on molecular data, a close relationship to species of the order Dothideales of the class Euascomycetes was proven.

Strain DSM 14940 is a very closely related to strain DSM 14941. The two strains show similar colony characteristics on agar plates; they are identical on their 18SrRNA gene region; and they are also identical on their Internal Transcribed Spacer regions ITS1 and ITS4, which are commonly used for inter- and intra-species differentiation. Definitive differentiation from each other can only be achieved by molecular biological methods focusing on the whole genome, by conducting such analyses as RAPD PCR (Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA Polymerase Chain Reaction) or by using recently developed strain-specific primer characteristics.

Aureobasidium pullulans strains DSM 14940 and DSM 14941 were identified at DSMZ by means of morphological characterization of the colonies on yeast medium (YM) agar plates. Further confirmation of these strains can be achieved via PCR. PCR reveals a specific band that distinguishes A. pullulans strains DSM 14940 and DSM 14941 from other isolates of A. pullulans and from other yeast-like fungi. The subject strains are neither mutant strains nor genetically modified strains.

Aureobasidium pullulans is a ubiquitous and widespread oligotrophe that can be found in environments with fluctuating water activities, such as the phyllosphere, bathrooms, food, and feeds. It can also be found in highly osmotically stressed environments, such as hypersaline waters in salterns, and rocks and monuments. Due to the production of large quantities of yeast-like propagules, this fungus disperses globally.]>

<	2. Magnitude of residues at the time of harvest and method used to determine the residue. [No magnitude of residue (MOR) studies have been conducted with the strains of Aureobasidium pullulans based on the low toxicity of the active ingredient strains (see Toxicology Profile, pages 5-10). OPPTS Guideline 885.2000, section f, Background for Residue Analysis of Microbial Pest Control Agents (MCPA), states:

"The Agency evaluates residue data for MCPAs used on food, feed, or raw agricultural commodities only if toxic or other harmful properties were observed in the maximum hazard toxicology tests (Tier I) prescribed in toxicology test guidelines OPPTS 885.3050 through 885.3650 of this series. If Tier I toxicology tests indicate no toxic or other harmful properties, then no residue data (with the general exception of a monitoring method) would be indicated and thus a recommendation for an exemption from the requirements of a tolerance can be made."]>

<	3. A statement of why an analytical method of detecting and measuring the levels of the pesticide residue are not needed. [SciReg, Inc. is submitting a petition to establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance and, therefore, an analytical method is not required.]>

<C. Mammalian Toxicological Profile>

<	[The full reports that support this petition and which are summarized in this section were submitted with the active ingredient registration application for Aureobasidium pullulans strain DSM 14941.

A subcutaneous toxicity/pathogenicity study was conducted that evaluated both strains separately. No toxicity or pathogenicity was observed. Neither Aureobasidium pullulans strain DSM 14940 nor strain DSM 14941 show any acute toxicity or pathogenicity by any of the required routes of exposure.

Acute Oral Toxicity/Pathogenicity: Twenty-four animals were dosed at 4x10[8] CFU/g of A. pullulans strain DSM 14941. Interim sacrifices were made on three animals per sex on Days 3, 7, and 14; the remaining animals were sacrificed on Day 21, the termination of the study. There were no deaths and all animals appeared normal throughout the entire study. Feces, blood, brain, lung, liver, kidney, spleen, lymph nodes, stomach, intestine, and target organs (none) were evaluated on Day 0 (feces only) and Day 3, 7, 14, and 21 (all other tissues) for test article-treated animals, untreated control animals, and inactivated test article-treated animals). A mycological summary of these evaluations follows.

Feces: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Blood: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Brain: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Lung: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Liver: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Kidney: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Spleen: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Lymph nodes: All samples negative for A. pullulans, except for one animal sacrificed on Day 7
Stomach: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Intestine: All samples negative for A. pullulans

Acute Oral Toxicity: Six animals were dosed at 2,000 mg/kg of the end-use product, Blossom Protect, comprised of 22% (2x10[10] CFU/g) A. pullulans strain DSM 14940, 22% (2x10[10] CFU/g) A. pullulans strain DSM 14941, and 56% toxicologically benign inert ingredients. There were no deaths and all animals appeared normal throughout the entire study. The LD50 was determined to be greater than 2,000 mg/kg.

Acute Subcutaneous Toxicity/Pathogenicity:
Study 1: Sixty animals were allocated to groups of three animals per sex as follows: Untreated control, inactivated control (strains DSM 14940 and DSM 14941), and test article-treated (strains DSM 14940 and DSM 14941, three groups per strain). Test article-treated animals received 2.36x10[10] CFU/g of strain DSM 14940 and 1.5x10[10] CFU/g of strain DSM 14941. Interim sacrifices were made on three animals per sex on Days 3, 7, and 14; the remaining animals were sacrificed on Day 21, the termination of the study. There were no deaths and all animals appeared normal throughout the entire study, except for edema or slight erythema at the injection site. Feces, blood, brain, lung, liver, kidney, spleen, lymph nodes, stomach, intestine, and target organs (none) were evaluated on Day 0 (feces only) and Day 3, 7, 14, and 21 (all other tissues) for test article-treated animals, untreated control animals, and inactivated test article-treated animals). A mycological summary of these evaluations follows.

Feces: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Blood: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Brain: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Lung: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Liver: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Kidney: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Spleen: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Lymph nodes: All samples negative for A. pullulans, except for one animal sacrificed on Day 7
Stomach: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Intestine: All samples negative for A. pullulans

Study 2: Thirty-six animals were allocated to groups of three animals per sex as follows: Untreated control, inactivated control (strain DSM 14941), and test article-treated (strain DSM 14941). Test article-treated animals received 1.1x10[9] CFU/g. Interim sacrifices were made on three animals per sex on Days 1 (control and test article-treated animals) and 7 (test article-treated animals); the remaining control, inactivated control, and test article-treated animals were sacrificed on Day 28, the termination of the study. There were no deaths and all animals appeared normal throughout the entire study, except for slight to severe edema and slight erythema at the injection site. Skin, brain, liver, lung, spleen, kidney, lymph nodes, blood, cecum contents, and urine were evaluated on their respective sacrifice days. A mycological summary of these evaluations follows.

Skin: Positive for A. pullulans (three males, three females from test article-treated group sacrificed on Day 1; two females from test article-treated group sacrificed on Day 7)
Brain: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Liver: Positive for A. pullulans (one male from test article-treated group sacrificed on Day 1)
Lung: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Spleen: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Kidney: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Lymph nodes: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Blood: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Cecum contents: Positive for A. pullulans (one male and one female from test article-treated group sacrificed on Day 1; two females from test article-treated group sacrificed on Day 7)
Urine: All samples negative for A. pullulans

Acute Subcutaneous Toxicity: Ten animals were dosed at 2,000 mg/kg of the end-use product, Blossom Protect, containing 22% each of strains DSM 14940 and DSM 14941 (each strain contained 7x10[9] CFU/g) and 56% toxicologically benign inert ingredients. One male animal was sacrificed for humane reasons five days post-dosing due to abscess rupture at the injection site. All other animals survived for the duration of the 14-day study. In-life observations included a bladder formed by the injection of the test material at the injection site, dermal swelling at the injection site, and ruptured abscess at the injection site. Necropsy observations included abscesses at all injection sites. The LD50 was determined to be greater than 2,000 mg/kg.

Acute Dermal Toxicity: Ten animals were dosed at 2,000 mg/kg of Blossom Protect containing 7x10[9] CFU/g each of strains DSM 14940 and DSM 14941. One male and one female animal exhibited chromodacryorrhea, but this was not considered to be toxicologically significant. All animals appeared healthy at necropsy. The LD50 was determined to be greater than 2,000 mg/kg.

Acute Pulmonary Toxicity/Pathogenicity: Forty-two animals were assigned to control (2 groups, each containing 2 animals per sex) and treated groups (main group, 5 animals per sex; interim sacrifice groups, 3 animals per sex). Treated animals were dosed at 4x10[8] CFU/g of strain DSM 14941. Interim sacrifices were made on three animals per sex on Days 0 (3 hours post-application), 3, 7, and 14; the remaining animals were sacrificed on Day 21, the termination of the study. There were no deaths and, except on the day of dosing when all treated animals showed reduced motor activity and dyspnea, all animals appeared normal throughout the entire study. Feces, blood, brain, lung, liver, kidney, spleen, stomach, small and large intestine, and lymph nodes were evaluated on Day 0 (feces only) and Day 3, 7, 14, and 21 (all other tissues) for untreated control and test article-treated animals. A mycological summary of these evaluations follows.

Feces: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Blood: All samples negative for A. pullulans, except for one male on Day 0
Brain: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Lung: All samples negative for A. pullulans, except for two males and two females on Day 0
Liver: All samples negative for A. pullulans, except for three males on Day 0
Kidney: All samples negative for A. pullulans
Spleen: All samples negative for A. pullulans, except for two males on Day 0
Lymph nodes: All samples negative for A. pullulans, except for one animal sacrificed on Day 7
Stomach: All samples negative for A. pullulans, except for two males on Day 0
Intestine: All samples negative for A. pullulans

Acute Inhalation Toxicity: Ten animals were dosed (nose only) with a 10% suspension of Blossom Protect at 5.17 mg/L containing 7x10[9] CFU/g each of strains DSM 14940 and DSM 14941. The MMAD was 4.2 um. There were no deaths and all animals appeared healthy throughout the study. There were no necropsy findings. The LC50 was determined to be greater than 5.17 mg/L.

Eye Irritation: Three rabbits were dosed with 0.1 mL (60-62 mg) of Blossom Protect. One animal exhibited a score of 1 for conjunctival redness one hour post-application. The corneas and irises were unaffected. There were no other clinical signs. All animals appeared normal 24 hours post-application. Blossom Protect is considered to be virtually non-irritating.

Dermal Irritation: Three rabbits were dosed with 0.5 g of Blossom Protect moistened with 1.0 mL deionized water. All animals appeared normal throughout the study. Blossom Protect is considered to be virtually non-irritating.

Hypersensitivity Incidents: No reports of hypersensitivity have been associated with A. pullulans strains DSM 14940 or DSM 14941.

In vivo Micronucleus: A. pullulans strain DSM 14941 was dissolved in water and administered by oral gavage one time to groups of mice at 2,000 mg/kg. Untreated, negative (water), and positive control (cyclophosphamide, IP injection, 10 mg/kg) were also evaluated. There were no in-life clinical signs. Animals were sacrificed 24 or 48 hours post-application and the femoral bone marrow was immediately harvested. The number of polychromatic erythrocytes to total erythrocytes (mature and immature) was determined. Two thousand immature erythrocytes per animal were scored for the incidence of micronucleated immature erythrocytes. A. pullulans strain DSM 14941 did not induce a statistically significant increase in micronucleated immature erythrocytes compared to negative and untreated control animals. All positive control groups showed a significant increase in the number of micronucleated immature erythrocytes.]>

<D. Aggregate Exposure>

<	1. Dietary exposure. [The potential for non-occupational, dietary, and non-dietary exposure to Aureobasidium pullulans by the general population, including infants and children, is likely through ingestion of treated fruit.]>

<	i. Food. [Dietary exposure to A. pullulans should not be of concern due to the low toxicity shown across the entire toxicological profile (see above). If these strains of A. pullulans are ingested, none of the studies have indicated any pathogenicity of the organism in mammals. In addition, the subject strains grow optimally at 27°C and 29°C and no growth has been noted at the normal human body temperature of 37°C.]>

<	ii. Drinking water. [Aureobasidium pullulans does not pose a risk to drinking water. Anticipated agricultural practice prohibits direct application of the end-use product directly to water. Aureobasidium pullulans is not likely to be present in aquatic environments since it is not known to inhabit aquatic environments.]>

<	2. Non-dietary exposure. [Non-dietary exposure to Aureobasidium pullulans will be much more likely through handling by formulators and applicators, but in light of the subject strains' toxicological profile, should be of little concern. Although the organism is ubiquitous, levels of exposure in broad segments of the world's population have not resulted in any significant reported adverse effects.]>

<E. Cumulative Effects>

<	[Section 408(b)(2) of the FFDCA requires that, when considering whether to establish an exemption from a tolerance, the Agency consider available information concerning the cumulative effects of the particular ingredient's residues and other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity. These considerations include the possible cumulative effects of such residues on infants and children. Organisms that control fruit rots on various species occupy pathogen infection sites; thus, this passive mode of action does not have a common chemical-based mechanism of toxicity as can sometimes be found with typical organic chemicals. While numerous open literature studies suggest some strains of A. pullulans have deleterious effects on humans, none of these strains are the ones to be registered by bio-ferm.]>

<F. Safety Determination>

<	1. U.S. population. [Aureobasidium pullulans exhibits low mammalian toxicity as demonstrated by the toxicological profile and did not induce genetic toxicity as demonstrated by the micronucleus study summarized above. When A. pullulans strains DSM 14940 and DSM 14941 are used on raw agricultural commodities in accordance with good agricultural practice, it meets the reasonable certainty of no harm requirement.]>

<	2. Infants and children. [It is believed that the potential exposure of infants and children to residues of Aureobasidium pullulans strains DSM 14940 and DSM 14941 through their use to protect plants and fruit against diseases is no greater than that of the general population. Available information does not suggest that infants and children are more susceptible to the effects of A. pullulans than are adults.]>

<G. Effects on the Immune and Endocrine Systems>

<	[Extensive literature searches and review of Aureobasidium pullulans strains DSM 14940 and DSM 14941 toxicity data indicate there is no evidence that these strains are endocrine disruptors or that they have any known effect on immune systems.]>

<H. Existing Tolerances>

<	[There are no known agricultural tolerances or tolerance exemptions for Aureobasidium pullulans strains DSM 14940 and DSM 14941.]>

<I. International Tolerances>

<	[There are no known international tolerances for Aureobasidium pullulans strains DSM 14940 and DSM 14941, though both strains are approved for pre- and post-bloom use against fire blight in pome fruit in Austria (2004), Hungary (2007), Slovakia (2007), and Slovenia (2008).]>


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 184 (Monday, September 23, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 58380]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23071]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property
at the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, DFW Airport, Texas

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of request to release for permanent easement of airport
property

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invite public comment on the
release of land at the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport under
the provisions of Section 125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation
Investment Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before [Insert date 30 days of
the posting of this Federal Register Notice].

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to
the FAA at the following address: Mr. Mike Nicely, Manager, Federal
Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, Airports Division, Texas
Airports Development Office, ASW-650, Fort Worth, Texas 76193-0650.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be
mailed or delivered to Mr. Jeff Fegan, Chief Executive Office, at the
following address: Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Executive
Office, P.O. Box 619428, DFW Airport, Texas 75261.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Mr. Rodney Clark, Program Manager,
Federal Aviation Administration, Texas Airports Development Office,
ASW-651, 2601 Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas 76193-0650,
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>fax: (817) 222-
5989.
    The request to release property may be reviewed in person at this
same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the
request to release property at the Dallas/Fort Worth International
Airport under the provisions of the AIR 21. On August 12, 2013, the FAA
determined that the request for permanent easement at Dallas/Fort Worth
International Airport, submitted by the Airport, met the procedural
requirements of the Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 155. The FAA may
approve the request, in whole or in part, no later than January 31,
2014.
    The following is a brief overview of the request:
    The Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport requests the release
for permanent easement of 67.6175 acres of non-aeronautical airport
property. The land was acquired by the Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth
for use as an airport. The funds generated by the release will be used
to develop, operate and maintain the Airport. Any person may inspect
the request in person at the FAA office listed above under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application,
notice and other documents relevant to the application in person at the
Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, telephone number (972) 973-
5200.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on September 12, 2013.
Kelvin L. Solco,
Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-23071 Filed 9-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 92 (Tuesday, May 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27330-27333]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11007]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2014-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1408]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Title
44, part 65 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44 CFR part 65). The
LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to calculate
appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and the
contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will become effective on the
dates listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS
report in effect prior to this determination for the listed
communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has ninety (90)
days in which to request through the community that the Deputy
Associate Administrator for Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
(email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR Part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         Chief executive                         Online location of
        State and county           Location and case       officer of         Community map        letter of map        Effective date of     Community
                                          No.               community          repository             revision             modification          No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arkansas:
    Benton......................  City of Bentonville  The Honorable Bob   305 Southwest A     http://                June 26, 2014........       050012
                                   (12-06-3754P).       McCaslin, Mayor,    Street,             www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        City of             Bentonville, AR     lomc.
                                                        Bentonville, 117    72712.
                                                        West Central
                                                        Avenue,
                                                        Bentonville, AR
                                                        72712.
    Garland.....................  City of Hot Springs  The Honorable Ruth  Hot Springs City    http://                June 26, 2014........       050084
                                   (12-06-3592P).       Carney, Mayor,      Hall Annex, 111     www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        City of Hot         Opera Street, Hot   lomc.
                                                        Springs, 133        Springs National
                                                        Convention          Park, AR 71901.
                                                        Boulevard, Hot
                                                        Springs National
                                                        Park, AR 71901.
New Jersey:
    Monmouth....................  Borough of           The Honorable       Borough Municipal   http://                May 27, 2014.........       340326
                                   Shrewsbury (13-02-   Donald W. Burden,   Complex, 419        www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   1926P).              Mayor, Borough of   Sycamore Avenue,    lomc.
                                                        Shrewsbury, P.O.    Shrewsbury, NJ
                                                        Box 7420,           07702.
                                                        Shrewsbury, NJ
                                                        07702.
    Morris......................  Township of Hanover  The Honorable       Hanover Township    http://                July 10, 2014........       340343
                                   (14-02-0085P).       Ronald F.           Municipal           www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Francioli, Mayor,   Building, 1000      lomc.
                                                        Township of         Route 10,
                                                        Hanover, P.O. Box   Whippany, NJ
                                                        250, Whippany, NJ   07981.
                                                        07981.
New Mexico: Santa Fe............  City of Santa Fe     The Honorable       200 Lincoln         http://                July 7, 2014.........       350070
                                   (13-06-3570P).       David Coss,         Avenue, Santa Fe,   www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      NM 87504.           lomc.
                                                        Santa Fe, 200
                                                        Lincoln Avenue,
                                                        Santa Fe, NM
                                                        87504.
Oklahoma:
    Kay.........................  City of Ponca City   The Honorable       City Hall, 516      http://                July 10, 2014........       400080
                                   (13-06-3801P).       Homer Nicholson,    East Grand          www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      Avenue, Ponca       lomc.
                                                        Ponca City, 516     City, OK 74601.
                                                        East Grand
                                                        Avenue, Ponca
                                                        City, OK 74601.
    Pottawatomie................  City of Shawnee (13- Mr. Brian           City Hall, 16 West  http://                June 30, 2014........       400178
                                   06-4706P).           McDougal,           9th Street,         www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Manager, City of    Shawnee, OK 74801.  lomc.
                                                        Shawnee, 16 West
                                                        9th Street,
                                                        Shawnee, OK 74801.
Texas:
    Bexar.......................  City of Helotes (13- The Honorable       Development         http://                May 1, 2014..........       481643
                                   06-4596P).           Thomas A.           Services            www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Schoolcraft,        Department, 12951   lomc.
                                                        Mayor, City of      Bandera Road,
                                                        Helotes, P.O. Box   Helotes, TX 78023.
                                                        507, Helotes, TX
                                                        78023.
    Bexar.......................  City of San Antonio  The Honorable       Department of       http://                May 1, 2014..........       480045
                                   (13-06-4596P).       Julian Castro,      Public Works,       www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      Storm Water         lomc.
                                                        San Antonio, P.O.   Engineering, 1901
                                                        Box 839966, San     South Alamo
                                                        Antonio, TX 78283.  Street, 2nd
                                                                            Floor, San
                                                                            Antonio, TX 78204.
    Bexar.......................  City of San Antonio  The Honorable       Department of       http://                June 23, 3014........       480045
                                   (14-06-0172P).       Julian Castro,      Public Works,       www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      Storm Water         lomc.
                                                        San Antonio, P.O.   Engineering, 1901
                                                        Box 839966, San     South Alamo
                                                        Antonio, TX 78283.  Street, 2nd
                                                                            Floor, San
                                                                            Antonio, TX 78204.
    Bexar.......................  City of San Antonio  The Honorable       Department of       http://                June 23, 3014........       480045
                                   (14-06-0677P).       Julian Castro,      Public Works,       www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      Storm Water         lomc.
                                                        San Antonio, P.O.   Engineering, 1901
                                                        Box 839966, San     South Alamo
                                                        Antonio, TX 78283.  Street, 2nd
                                                                            Floor, San
                                                                            Antonio, TX 78204.
    Bexar.......................  City of San Antonio  The Honorable       Department of       http://                July 14, 2014........       480045
                                   (14-06-0360P).       Julian Castro,      Public Works,       www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      Storm Water         lomc.
                                                        San Antonio, P.O.   Engineering, 1901
                                                        Box 839966, San     South Alamo
                                                        Antonio, TX 78283.  Street, 2nd
                                                                            Floor, San
                                                                            Antonio, TX 78204.
    Bexar.......................  City of San Antonio  The Honorable       Department of       http://                July 16, 2014........       480045
                                   (13-06-2351P).       Julian Castro,      Public Works,       www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      Storm Water         lomc.
                                                        San Antonio, P.O.   Engineering, 1901
                                                        Box 839966, San     South Alamo
                                                        Antonio, TX 78283.  Street, 2nd
                                                                            Floor, San
                                                                            Antonio, TX 78204.
    Brazos......................  City of Bryan (13-   The Honorable       City Hall, 300      http://                July 7, 2014.........       480082
                                   06-2606P).           Jason Bienski,      South Texas         www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      Avenue, Bryan, TX   lomc.
                                                        Bryan, 300 South    77803.
                                                        Texas Avenue,
                                                        Bryan, TX 77803.

    Collin......................  City of McKinney     The Honorable       City Hall, 222      http://                June 30, 2014........       480135
                                   (13-06-3699P).       Brian               North Tennessee     www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Loughmiller,        Street, McKinney,   lomc.
                                                        Mayor, City of      TX 75069.
                                                        McKinney, P.O.
                                                        Box 517,
                                                        McKinney, TX
                                                        75070.
    Dallas......................  City of Dallas (13-  The Honorable Mike  Public Works        http://                July 28, 2014........       480171
                                   06-2620P).           Rawlings, Mayor,    Department, 320     www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        City of Dallas,     East Jefferson      lomc.
                                                        1500 Marilla        Boulevard, Room
                                                        Street, Room 5EN,   307, Dallas, TX
                                                        Dallas, TX 75201.   75203.
    Denton......................  City of Denton (13-  The Honorable Mark  City Hall, 601      http://                July 28, 2014........       480194
                                   06-3803P).           A. Burroughs,       East Hickory        www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      Street, Denton,     lomc.
                                                        Denton, 215 East    TX 76205.
                                                        McKinney Street,
                                                        Denton, TX 76201.
    Denton......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable Mary  Denton County       http://                July 28, 2014........       480774
                                   areas of Denton      Horn, Denton        Planning            www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (13-06-       County Judge, 110   Department, 1505    lomc.
                                   3803P).              West Hickory        East McKinney
                                                        Street, 2nd         Street, Suite
                                                        Floor, Denton, TX   175, Denton, TX
                                                        76201.              76209.
    Harris......................  City of Houston (13- The Honorable       Public Works and    http://                June 26, 2014........       480296
                                   06-4399P).           Annise Parker,      Engineering         www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      Department, 611     lomc.
                                                        Houston, P.O. Box   Walker Street,
                                                        1562, Houston, TX   Houston, TX 77002.
                                                        77251.
    Harris......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable Ed    Harris County,      http://                June 26, 2014........       480287
                                   areas of Harris      M. Emmett, Harris   10555 Northwest     www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (13-06-       County Judge,       Freeway, Houston,   lomc.
                                   4399P).              1001 Preston        TX 77092.
                                                        Street, Suite
                                                        911, Houston, TX
                                                        77002.
    Harris......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable Ed    Harris County,      http://                July 7, 2014.........       480287
                                   areas of Harris      M. Emmett, Harris   10555 Northwest     www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (14-06-       County Judge,       Freeway, Houston,   lomc.
                                   0260P).              1001 Preston        TX 77092.
                                                        Street, Suite
                                                        911, Houston, TX
                                                        77002.
    Hays........................  City of Kyle (13-06- The Honorable Lucy  Building            http://                July 10, 2014........       481108
                                   3638P).              Johnson, Mayor,     Department, 100     www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        City of Kyle, 191   West Center         lomc.
                                                        Cleveland, Kyle,    Street, Kyle, TX
                                                        TX 78640.           78640.
    Tarrant.....................  City of Forest Hill  The Honorable       City Hall, 3219     http://                May 29, 2014.........       480595
                                   (14-06-0893X).       Gerald Joubert,     California          www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      Parkway, Forest     lomc.
                                                        Forest Hill, 3219   Hill, TX 76119.
                                                        California
                                                        Parkway, Forest
                                                        Hill, TX 76119.
    Tarrant.....................  City of Fort Worth   The Honorable       Department of       http://                May 29, 2014.........       480596
                                   (13-06-3009P).       Betsy Price,        Transportation      www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      and Public Works,   lomc.
                                                        Fort Worth, 1000    1000 Throckmorton
                                                        Throckmorton        Street, Fort
                                                        Street, Fort        Worth, TX 76102.
                                                        Worth, TX 76102.
    Tarrant.....................  City of Mansfield    The Honorable       City Hall, 1200     http://                May 16, 2014.........       480606
                                   (13-06-2771P).       David L. Cook,      East Broad          www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      Street,             lomc.
                                                        Mansfield, 1200     Mansfield, TX
                                                        East Broad          76063.
                                                        Street,
                                                        Mansfield, TX
                                                        76063.
Virginia: Spotsylvania..........  Unincorporated       Mr. C. Douglas      Spotsylvania        http://                June 5, 2014.........       510308
                                   areas of             Barnes,             County              www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   Spotsylvania         Spotsylvania        Environmental       lomc.
                                   County (13-03-       County              Engineering
                                   1116P).              Administrator,      Office, 9019 Old
                                                        9104 Courthouse     Battlefield
                                                        Road,               Boulevard, Suite
                                                        Spotsylvania, VA    300,
                                                        22553.              Spotsylvania, VA
                                                                            22553.
West Virginia:
    Cabell......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable       Cabell County       http://                June 26, 2014........       540016
                                   areas of Cabell      Nancy Cartmill,     Office of Grants,   www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (13-03-       President, Cabell   Planning and        lomc.
                                   0925P).              County              Permits, 750 5th
                                                        Commission, 750     Avenue, Suite
                                                        5th Avenue, Suite   314, Huntington,
                                                        300, Huntington,    WV 25701.
                                                        WV 25701.
    Cabell......................  Village of           The Honorable Paul  Village Hall, 721   http://                June 26, 2014........       540017
                                   Barboursville (13-   Turman, Mayor,      Central Avenue,     www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   03-0925P).           Village of          Barboursville, WV   lomc.
                                                        Barboursville,      25504.
                                                        721 Central
                                                        Avenue,
                                                        Barboursville, WV
                                                        25504.
    Raleigh.....................  Unincorporated       The Honorable       Raleigh County      http://                July 14, 2014........       540169
                                   areas of Raleigh     David L.            Commission, 116 1/  www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (13-03-       Tolliver,           2 North Heber       lomc.
                                   2399P).              President,          Street, Beckley,
                                                        Raleigh County      WV 25801.
                                                        Commission, 116 1/
                                                        2 North Heber
                                                        Street, Beckley,
                                                        WV 25801.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: April 22, 2014.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014-11007 Filed 5-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3043-3046]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00974]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-82503; File Nos. SR-BatsBYX-2017-11; SR-BatsBZX-2017-
38; SR-BatsEDGA-2017-13; SR-BatsEDGX-2017-22; SR-BOX-2017-16; SR-BX-
2017-023; SR-C2-2017-017; SR-CBOE-2017-040; SR-CHX-2017-08; SR-FINRA-
2017-011; SR-GEMX-2017-17; SR-IEX-2017-16; SR-ISE-2017-45; SR-MIAX-
2017-18; SR-MRX-2017-04; SR-NASDAQ-2017-046; SR-NYSE-2017-22; SR-
NYSEArca-2017-52; SR-NYSEMKT-2017-26; SR-PEARL-2017-20; SR-PHLX-2017-
37]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats BYX Exchange, Inc. (n/k/a
Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc.), Bats BZX Exchange, Inc. (n/k/a Cboe BZX
Exchange, Inc.), Bats EDGA Exchange, Inc. (n/k/a Cboe EDGA Exchange,
Inc.), Bats EDGX Exchange, Inc. (n/k/a Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.), BOX
Options Exchange LLC, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (n/k/a Cboe C2
Options Exchange, Inc.), Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(n/k/a Cboe Exchange, Inc.), Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., Investors' Exchange LLC, Miami
International Securities Exchange, LLC, MIAX PEARL, LLC, Nasdaq BX,
Inc., Nasdaq GEMX, LLC, Nasdaq ISE, LLC, Nasdaq MRX, LLC, Nasdaq PHLX
LLC, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, New York Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE
Arca, Inc. and NYSE MKT LLC (n/k/a NYSE American LLC); Notice of
Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Changes, as Modified by Amendments, To
Establish Fees for Industry Members To Fund the Consolidated Audit
Trail

January 16, 2018.
    On May 1, 2017,\1\ May 2, 2017,\2\ May 3, 2017,\3\ May 8, 2017,\4\
May 9, 2017,\5\ May 10, 2017,\6\ May 12, 2017,\7\ May 15, 2017,\8\ May
16, 2017,\9\ and May 23, 2017,\10\ Bats BYX Exchange, Inc. (``Bats
BYX'') (n/k/a Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc.),\11\ Bats BZX Exchange, Inc.
(``Bats BZX'') (n/k/a Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.),\12\ Bats EDGA Exchange,
Inc. (``Bats EDGA'') (n/k/a Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc.),\13\ Bats EDGX
Exchange, Inc. (``Bats EDGX'') (n/k/a Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.),\14\
BOX Options Exchange LLC (``BOX''), C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``C2'') (n/k/a Cboe C2 Options Exchange, Inc.),\15\ Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated (``CBOE'') (n/k/a Cboe Exchange,
Inc.),\16\ Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX''), Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA''), Investors Exchange LLC
(``IEX''), Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE''), Miami International Securities
Exchange, LLC (``MIAX''), MIAX PEARL, LLC (``PEARL''), Nasdaq BX, Inc.
(``BX''), Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (``GEMX''), Nasdaq MRX, LLC (``MRX''),
Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx''), The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq''),
New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE''), NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'')
and NYSE MKT LLC (``NYSE MKT'') (n/k/a NYSE American LLC) \17\
(collectively, the ``Participants'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the ``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \18\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\19\ proposed rule changes to adopt fees to be charged to
Industry Members to fund the Consolidated Audit Trail (collectively the
``Original Proposed Rule Changes'').\20\ The Original Proposed Rule
Changes were immediately effective upon filing with the Commission
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\21\ The proposed rule
changes submitted by MIAX and PEARL were published for comment in the
Federal Register on May 19, 2017.\22\ The proposed rule changes
submitted by BX, CHX, IEX, Nasdaq, NYSE, NYSE Arca and NYSE MKT were
published for comment in the Federal Register on May 22, 2017.\23\ The
proposed rule change submitted by FINRA was published for comment in
the Federal Register on May 23, 2017.\24\ The proposed rule changes
submitted by BOX, GEMX, ISE, MRX and Phlx were published for comment in
the Federal Register on May 24, 2017.\25\ The proposed rule changes
submitted by C2, CBOE and Bats EDGA were published for comment in the
Federal Register on June 1, 2017.\26\ The proposed rule change
submitted by Bats BYX was published for comment in the Federal

Register on June 5, 2017.\27\ The proposed rule changes submitted by
Bats BZX and Bats EDGX were published for comment in the Federal
Register on June 6, 2017.\28\ The Commission received seven comment
letters on the Original Proposed Rule Changes,\29\ and a response to
comments from the Participants.\30\ On June 30, 2017, the Commission
temporarily suspended and initiated proceedings to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the proposed rule changes.\31\ The Commission
thereafter received seven comment letters,\32\ and a response to
comments from the Participants.\33\ On October 25, 2017,\34\ October
31, 2017,\35\ November 3, 2017,\36\ November 6, 2017,\37\ November 7,
2017,\38\ November 9, 2017 \39\ and December 1, 2017,\40\ the
Participants each filed an Amendment No. 1 to their Original Proposed
Rule Changes that replaced and superseded the Original Proposed Rule
Changes that had been temporarily suspended by the Commission. On
November 9, 2017, the Commission extended the time period for
Commission action on the proceedings to determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposed rule changes.\41\ On November 29, 2017,\42\
November 30, 2017,\43\ December 1, 2017,\44\ December 4, 2017,\45\
December 5, 2017,\46\ December 6, 2017 \47\ and December 7, 2017,\48\
the Participants, except FINRA, each filed Amendment No. 2 to their
proposed rule changes.\49\ The amended proposed rule changes submitted
by CHX and FINRA were published for comment in the Federal Register on
December 14, 2017.\50\ The amended proposed rule changes submitted by
PEARL, MIAX, IEX, NYSE, NYSE MKT, NYSE Arca, BOX, Bats EDGA, C2, CBOE,
Bats BYX, Bats EDGX, Bats BZX, ISE, BX, Nasdaq, GEMX, MRX, and Phlx
were published for comment in the Federal Register on December 14, 2017
\51\ and December 15, 2017.\52\ The Commission received two

comment letters on the amended proposed rule changes.\53\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC and MIAX PEARL
LLC filed their proposed rule changes on May 1, 2017.
    \2\ The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC and Nasdaq BX, Inc. filed their
proposed rule changes on May 2, 2017.
    \3\ Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. filed its proposed rule change
on May 3, 2017.
    \4\ Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. filed its
proposed rule change on May 8, 2017.
    \5\ Investors Exchange LLC originally filed its proposed rule
change on May 3, 2017 under File No. SR-IEX-2017-13, and
subsequently withdrew that filing and filed a proposed rule change
on May 9, 2017.
    \6\ The New York Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE Arca, Inc. and NYSE
MKT LLC filed their proposed rule changes on May 10, 2017.
    \7\ Nasdaq GEMX LLC, Nasdaq ISE, LLC, Nasdaq MRX, LLC and Nasdaq
PHLX LLC originally filed their proposed rule changes on May 3, 2017
under File Nos. SR-GEMX-2017-11, SR-ISE-2017-40, SR-MRX-2017-03, and
SR-PHLX-2017-35, and subsequently withdrew those filings and filed
proposed rule changes on May 12, 2017.
    \8\ BOX Options Exchange LLC originally filed its proposed rule
change on May 11, 2017 under File No. SR-BOX-2017-15, and
subsequently withdrew that filing and filed a proposed rule change
on May 15, 2017.
    \9\ Bats BYX Exchange, Inc., C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated
and Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated filed their
proposed rule changes on May 16, 2017. Bats EDGA Exchange, Inc.
originally filed its proposed rule change on May 5, 2017 under File
No. SR-BatsEDGA-2017-11, and subsequently withdrew that filing on
May 11, 2017 and filed a proposed rule change on May 16, 2017.
    \10\ Bats BZX Exchange, Inc. filed its proposed rule changes on
May 23, 2017. Bats EDGX Exchange, Inc. originally filed its proposed
rule change on May 5, 2017 under File No. SR-BatsEDGX-2017-20, and
subsequently withdrew that filing on May 10, 2017 and filed a
proposed rule change on May 23, 2017.
    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81952 (October 26,
2017), 82 FR 50725 (November 1, 2017). The name change was not yet
effective when Bats BYX filed SR-BatsBYX-2017-11.
    \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81962 (October 26,
2017), 82 FR 50711 (November 1, 2017). The name change was not yet
effective when Bats BZX filed SR-BatsBZX-2017-38.
    \13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81957 (October 26,
2017), 82 FR 50716 (November 1, 2017). The name change was not yet
effective when Bats EDGA filed SR-BatsEDGA-2017-13.
    \14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81963 (October 26,
2017), 82 FR 50697 (November 1, 2017). The name change was not yet
effective when Bats EDGX filed SR-BatsEDGX-2017-22.
    \15\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81979 (October 30,
2017), 82 FR 51317 (November 3, 2017). The name change was not yet
effective when C2 filed SR-C2-2017-017.
    \16\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81981 (October 30,
2017), 82 FR 51309 (November 3, 2017). The name change was not yet
effective when CBOE filed SR-CBOE-2017-040.
    \17\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80283 (March 21,
2017), 82 FR 15244 (March 27, 2017). The name change was not yet
effective when NYSE MKT filed SR-NYSEMKT-2017-26.
    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \20\ See infra notes 22-28. The National Market System Plan
Governing the Consolidated Audit Trail (``CAT NMS Plan'') was
published for comment in the Federal Register on May 17, 2016, and
approved by the Commission, as modified, on November 15, 2016. See
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 77724 (April 27, 2016), 81 FR
30614 (May 17, 2016); 79318 (November 15, 2016), 81 FR 84696
(November 23, 2016).
    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). A proposed rule change may take
effect upon filing with the Commission if it is designated by the
exchange as ``establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge
imposed by the self-regulatory organization on any person, whether
or not the person is a member of the self-regulatory organization.''
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \22\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 80675 (May 15,
2017), 82 FR 23100 (May 19, 2017) (SR-MIAX-2017-18); and 80676 (May
15, 2017), 82 FR 23083 (May 19, 2017) (SR-PEARL-2017-20).
    \23\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 80697 (May 16,
2017), 82 FR 23398 (May 22, 2017) (SR-BX-2017-023); 80691 (May 16,
2017), 82 FR 23344 (May 22, 2017) (SR-CHX-2017-08); 80692 (May 16,
2017), 82 FR 23325 (May 22, 2017) (SR-IEX-2017-16); 80696 (May 16,
2017), 82 FR 23439 (May 22, 2017) (SR-NASDAQ-2017-046); 80693 (May
16, 2017), 82 FR 23363 (May 22, 2017) (SR-NYSE-2017-22); 80698 (May
16, 2017), 82 FR 23457 (May 22, 2017) (SR-NYSEArca-2017-52); and
80694 (May 16, 2017), 82 FR 23416 (May 22, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-2017-
26).
    \24\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80710 (May 17,
2017), 82 FR 23639 (May 23, 2017) (SR-FINRA-2017-011).
    \25\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 80721 (May 18,
2017), 82 FR 23864 (May 24, 2017) (SR-BOX-2017-16); 80713 (May 18,
2017), 82 FR 23956 (May 24, 2017) (SR-GEMX-2017-17); 80715 (May 18,
2017), 82 FR 23895 (May 24, 2017) (SR-ISE-2017-45); 80726 (May 18,
2017), 82 FR 23915 (May 24, 2017) (SR-MRX-2017-04); and 80725 (May
18, 2017), 82 FR 23935 (May 24, 2017) (SR-PHLX-2017-37).
    \26\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 80786 (May 26,
2017), 82 FR 25474 (June 1, 2017) (SR-C2-2017-017); 80785 (May 26,
2017), 82 FR 25404 (June 1, 2017) (SR-CBOE-2017-040); and 80784 (May
26, 2017), 82 FR 25448 (June 1, 2017) (SR-BatsEDGA-2017-13).
    \27\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80809 (May 30,
2017), 82 FR 25837 (June 5, 2017) (SR-BatsBYX-2017-11).
    \28\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 80822 (May 31,
2017), 82 FR 26148 (June 6, 2017) (SR-BatsBZX-2017-38); and 80821
(May 31, 2017), 82 FR 26177 (June 6, 2017) (SR-BatsEDGX-2017-22).
    \29\ Since the Participants' proposed rule changes to adopt fees
to be charged to Industry Members to fund the Consolidated Audit
Trail are substantively identical, the Commission considered all
comments received on the proposed rule changes regardless of the
comment file to which they were submitted. See Letter from Theodore
R. Lazo, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, Securities
Industry and Financial Markets Association, to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Commission (dated June 6, 2017), available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-batsbzx-2017-38/batsbzx201738-1788188-153228.pdf; Letter from Patricia L. Cerny and Steven O'Malley,
Compliance Consultants, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission
(dated June 12, 2017), available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboe-2017-040/cboe2017040-1799253-153675.pdf; Letter from Daniel
Zinn, General Counsel, OTC Markets Group Inc., to Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary, Commission (dated June 13, 2017), available at:
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-finra-2017-011/finra2017011-1801717-153703.pdf; Letter from Joanna Mallers, Secretary, FIA Principal
Traders Group, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission (dated June
22, 2017), available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboe-2017-040/cboe2017040-1819670-154195.pdf; Letter from Stuart J. Kaswell,
Executive Vice President and Managing Director, General Counsel,
Managed Funds Association, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission
(dated June 23, 2017), available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-finra-2017-011/finra2017011-1822454-154283.pdf; and Letter from
Suzanne H. Shatto, Investor, to Commission (dated June 27, 2017),
available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-batsedgx-2017-22/batsedgx201722-154443.pdf. The Commission also received a comment
letter which is not pertinent to these proposed rule changes. See
Letter from Christina Crouch, Smart Ltd., to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Commission (dated June 5, 2017), available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-batsbzx-2017-38/batsbzx201738-1785545-153152.htm.
    \30\ See Letter from CAT NMS Plan Participants to Brent J.
Fields, Secretary, Commission (dated June 29, 2017), available at:
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-batsbyx-2017-11/batsbyx201711-1832632-154584.pdf.
    \31\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81067 (June 30,
2017), 82 FR 31656 (July 7, 2017).
    \32\ See Letter from W. Hardy Callcott, Partner, Sidley Austin
LLP, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission (dated July 27,
2017), available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-batsbyx-2017-11/batsbyx201711-2148338-157737.pdf; Letter from Kevin Coleman,
General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, Belvedere Trading LLC,
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission (dated July 28, 2017),
available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-batsbyx-2017-11/batsbyx201711-2148360-157740.pdf; Letter from Joanna Mallers,
Secretary, FIA Principal Traders Group, to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Commission (dated July 28, 2017), available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-batsbyx-2017-11/batsbyx201711-2151228-157745.pdf; Letter from Theodore R. Lazo, Managing Director and
Associate General Counsel, SIFMA, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary,
Commission (dated July 28, 2017), available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-batsbyx-2017-11/batsbyx201711-2150977-157744.pdf; Letter
from Stuart J. Kaswell, Executive Vice President and Managing
Director, General Counsel, Managed Funds Association, to Brent J.
Fields, Secretary, Commission (dated July 28, 2017), available at:
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-batsbyx-2017-11/batsbyx201711-2150818-157743.pdf; Letter from John Kinahan, Chief Executive
Officer, Group One Trading, L.P., to Brent J. Fields, Secretary,
Commission (dated August 10, 2017), available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-finra-2017-011/finra2017011-2214568-160619.pdf; Letter from Joseph Molluso, Executive Vice President and
CFO, Virtu Financial, to Brent J. Fields, Commission (dated August
18, 2017), available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-finra-2017-011/finra2017011-2238648-160830.pdf .
    \33\ See Letter from Michael Simon, Chair, CAT NMS Plan
Operating Committee, to Brent J. Fields, Commission, Secretary
(dated November 2, 2017), available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-batsbyx-2017-11/batsbyx201711-2674608-161412.pdf.
    \34\ NYSE, NYSE Arca and NYSE MKT filed Amendment No. 1 to their
proposed rule changes on October 25, 2017.
    \35\ IEX filed Amendment No. 1 to its proposed rule change on
October 31, 2017.
    \36\ Bats BYX, Bats BZX, Bats EDGA, Bats EDGX, CBOE and C2 filed
Amendment No. 1 to their proposed rule changes on November 3, 2017.
    \37\ Nasdaq, BX, Phlx, ISE, MRX, and GEMX filed Amendment No. 1
to their proposed rule changes on November 6, 2017.
    \38\ BOX, MIAX and PEARL filed Amendment No. 1 to their proposed
rule changes on November 7, 2017.
    \39\ CHX filed Amendment No. 1 to its proposed rule change on
November 9, 2017.
    \40\ FINRA filed Amendment No. 1 to its proposed rule change on
December 1, 2017.
    \41\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82049 (November 9,
2017), 82 FR 53549 (November 16, 2017).
    \42\ NYSE, NYSE MKT and NYSE Arca filed Amendment No. 2 to their
proposed rule changes on November 29, 2017.
    \43\ CHX filed Amendment No. 2 to its proposed rule change on
November 30, 2017.
    \44\ MIAX and PEARL filed Amendment No. 2 to their proposed rule
changes on December 1, 2017.
    \45\ NASDAQ, Phlx and IEX filed Amendment No. 2 to their
proposed rule changes on December 4, 2017.
    \46\ ISE filed Amendment No. 2 to its proposed rule change on
December 5, 2017.
    \47\ GEMX and MRX filed Amendment No. 2 to their proposed rule
changes on December 6, 2017.
    \48\ BX, BOX, Bats EDGA, C2, CBOE, Bats BYX, Bats EDGX, and Bats
BZX filed Amendment No. 2 to their proposed rule changes on December
7, 2017.
    \49\ Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule changes proposed to
make a correction to the Amendment No. 1 fee schedule to change a
parenthetical regarding the OTC Equity Securities discount in
paragraph (b)(2) of the proposed fee schedule from ``with a discount
for Equity ATSs exclusively trading OTC Equity Securities based on
the average shares per trade ratio between NMS Stocks and OTC Equity
Securities'' to ``with a discount for OTC Equity Securities market
share of Equity ATSs trading OTC Equity Securities based on the
average shares per trade ratio between NMS Stocks and OTC Equity
Securities.'' NASDAQ, Phlx, ISE, GEMX, MRX and BX filed an Amendment
No. 2 that replaced and superseded Amendment No. 1 to their proposed
rule changes. FINRA did not file Amendment No. 2 to its proposed
rule change because its Amendment No. 1 did not need the correction
made by the other Participants' Amendment No. 2.
    \50\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 82251 (December 8,
2017), 82 FR 59151 (December 14, 2017); 82252 (December 8, 2017), 82
FR 59037 (December 14, 2017); 82253 (December 8, 2017), 82 FR 58827
(December 14, 2017).
    \51\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 82254 (December
11, 2017), 82 FR 59094 (December 14, 2017); 82256 (December 11,
2017), 82 FR 59004 (December 14, 2017); 82258 (December 11, 2017),
82 FR 58917 (December 14, 2017); 82262 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR
59122 (December 14, 2017); 82264 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 58971
(December 14, 2017); 82268 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 58854
(December 14, 2017); 82274 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59177
(December 14, 2017); 82284 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 58891
(December 14, 2017); 82285 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59040
(December 14, 2017); 82286 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59067
(December 14, 2017); and 82288 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 58944
(December 14, 2017).
    \52\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 82255 (December
11, 2017), 82 FR 59841 (December 15, 2017); 82257 (December 11,
2017), 82 FR 59835 (December 15, 2017); 82259 (December 11, 2017),
82 FR 59933 (December 15, 2017); 82260 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR
59907 (December 15, 2017); 82261 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59897
(December 15, 2017); 82263 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59838
(December 15, 2017); 82265 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59723
(December 15, 2017); 82266 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59779
(December 15, 2017); 82267 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59680
(December 15, 2017); 82269 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59902
(December 15, 2017); 82270 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59805
(December 15, 2017); 82271 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59833
(December 15, 2017); 82272 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59871
(December 15, 2017); 82273 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59683
(December 15, 2017); 82275 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59721
(December 15, 2017); 82276 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59753
(December 15, 2017); 82277 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59905
(December 15, 2017); 82278 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59726
(December 15, 2017); 82279 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59900
(December 15, 2017); 82283 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59694
(December 15, 2017); and 82287 (December 11, 2017), 82 FR 59844
(December 15, 2017).
    \53\ See Letter from Theodore R. Lazo, Managing Director and
Associate General Counsel, Securities Industry and Financial Markets
Association, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission (dated
December 22, 2017), available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-batsbyx-2017-11/batsbyx201711-2838733-161715.pdf; Letter from Joanna
Mallers, Secretary, FIA Principal Traders Group, to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Commission (dated January 12, 2018), available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboe-2017-040/cboe2017040-2902365-161828.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 9, 2018, CHX, MIAX and PEARL withdrew their proposed
rule changes (SR-CHX-2017-08; SR-MIAX-2017-18; SR-PEARL-2017-20). On
January 10, 2018, Bats BYX, Bats BZX, Bats EDGA, Bats EDGX, BX, C2,
CBOE, GEMX, IEX, ISE, MRX, Nasdaq and Phlx withdrew their proposed rule
changes (SR-BatsBYX-2017-11; SR-BatsBZX-2017-38; SR-BatsEDGA-2017-13;
SR-BatsEDGX-2017-22; SR-BX-2017-023; SR-C2-2017-017; SR-CBOE-2017-040;
SR-GEMX-2017-17; SR-IEX-2017-16; SR-ISE-2017-45; SR-MRX-2017-04; SR-
NASDAQ-2017-046; SR-PHLX-2017-37). On January 11, 2018, BOX, FINRA,
NYSE, NYSE Arca, and NYSE MKT withdrew their proposed rule changes (SR-
BOX-2017-16; SR-FINRA-2017-011; SR-NYSE-2017-22; SR-NYSEArca-2017-52;
SR-NYSEMKT-2017-26).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\54\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \54\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-00974 Filed 1-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 13 (Thursday, January 20, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 3596]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1129]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 67

[Docket ID FEMA-2008-0020; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1066]

Proposed Flood Elevation Determinations for York County, Maine
(All Jurisdictions)

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing
its notice of proposed rulemaking concerning proposed flood elevation
determinations for York County, Maine (All Jurisdictions).

DATES: As of January 20, 2011, the notice of proposed rulemaking
published August 18, 2010, at 75 FR 50955 is withdrawn.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this withdrawn rulemaking is available for
inspection or copying at 500 C St., SW., Washington, DC 20472

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 18, 2010, FEMA published a
proposed rulemaking at 75 FR 50955, proposing flood elevation
determinations along multiple flooding sources in York County, Maine.
FEMA is withdrawing the proposed rulemaking in order to convert the
York County flood study to FEMA's Risk Mapping, Assessment, and
Planning (Risk MAP) Program as requested by several communities in the
county.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4.

    Dated: January 11, 2011.
Edward L. Connor,
Acting Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administrator, Mitigation,
Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011-1129 Filed 1-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P