[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 20, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78810-78812]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32498]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30818; Amdt. No. 3457]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective December 20, 2011. The compliance date
for each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of December 20, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matter incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169; or
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202)
741-6030, or go to:http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability_All SIAPs are available online free of charge. Visit
nfdc.faa.gov to register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP copies may be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard A. Dunham III, Flight
Procedure Standards Branch (AFS-420) Flight Technologies and Programs
Division, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration,
Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082 Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, part 97 (14 CFR part 97) by amending the referenced SIAPs.
The complete regulatory description of each SIAP is listed on the
appropriate FAA Form 8260, as modified by the National Flight Data
Center (FDC)/Permanent Notice to Airmen (P-NOTAM), and is incorporated
by reference in the amendment under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and
Sec.  97.20 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    The large number of SIAPs, their complex nature, and the need for a
special format make their verbatim publication in the Federal Register
expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use the regulatory
text of the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic depiction on charts
printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. Thus, the advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP contained in FAA form documents is
unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR sections and
specifies the types of SIAP and the corresponding effective dates. This
amendment also identifies the airport and its location, the procedure
and the amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP as amended in the transmittal. For safety and
timeliness of change considerations, this amendment incorporates only
specific changes contained for each SIAP as modified by FDC/P-NOTAMs.
    The SIAPs, as modified by FDC P-NOTAM, and contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for

Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these changes to
SIAPs, the TERPS criteria were applied only to specific conditions
existing at the affected airports. All SIAP amendments in this rule
have been previously issued by the FAA in a FDC NOTAM as an emergency
action of immediate flight safety relating directly to published
aeronautical charts. The circumstances which created the need for all
these SIAP amendments requires making them effective in less than 30
days.
    Because of the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs
and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and public procedure
before adopting these SIAPs are impracticable and contrary to the
public interest and, where applicable, that good cause exists for
making these SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air traffic control, Airports, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 9, 2011.
John M. Allen,
Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations, part 97, 14 CFR part 97, is amended by
amending Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, effective at 0901 UTC
on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

Sec. Sec.  97.23, 97.25, 97.27, 97.29, 97.31, 97.33, 97.35  [Amended]

    By amending: Sec.  97.23 VOR, VOR/DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME or
TACAN; Sec.  97.25 LOC, LOC/DME, LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME; Sec.
97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; Sec.  97.29 ILS, ILS/DME, MLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV;
Sec.  97.31 RADAR SIAPs; Sec.  97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and Sec.  97.35 COPTER
SIAPs, Identified as follows:

* * * Effective Upon Publication

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    AIRAC Date          State           City             Airport        FDC No.      FDC Date        Subject
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12-Jan-12.........  CQ            Rota Island.....  Rota Intl.......       1/2192      11/9/11  This NOTAM,
                                                                                published in TL
                                                                                12-01, is
                                                                                hereby
                                                                                rescinded in
                                                                                its entirety.
12-Jan-12.........  CQ            Rota Island.....  Rota Intl.......       1/2193      11/9/11  This NOTAM,
                                                                                published in TL
                                                                                12-01, is
                                                                                hereby
                                                                                rescinded in
                                                                                its entirety.
12-Jan-12.........  CQ            Rota Island.....  Rota Intl.......       1/2194      11/9/11  This NOTAM,
                                                                                published in TL
                                                                                12-01, is
                                                                                hereby
                                                                                rescinded in
                                                                                its entirety.
12-Jan-12.........  WI            Racine..........  John H. Batten..       1/1475      11/9/11  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                4, Orig.
12-Jan-12.........  WI            Racine..........  John H. Batten..       1/1478      11/9/11  VOR RWY 4, Amdt
                                                                                1.
12-Jan-12.........  WI            Racine..........  John H. Batten..       1/1479      11/9/11  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                32, Orig.
12-Jan-12.........  NJ            Berlin..........  Camden County...       1/2601      12/1/11  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                5, Orig.
12-Jan-12.........  NJ            Berlin..........  Camden County...       1/2603      12/1/11  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                23, Orig.
12-Jan-12.........  NC            Beaufort........  Michael J. Smith       1/2605      12/1/11  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                     Field.                                      21, Amdt 1.
12-Jan-12.........  CT            Windsor Locks...  Bradley Intl....       1/3411      12/1/11  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                                                24, ILS RWY 24
                                                                                (SA CAT I), ILS
                                                                                RWY 24 (SA CAT
                                                                                II), Amdt 12.
12-Jan-12.........  TN            Memphis.........  Memphis Intl....       1/4441      12/1/11  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                                                36L, ILS RWY
                                                                                36L (CAT II),
                                                                                ILS RWY 36L
                                                                                (CAT III), Amdt
                                                                                14A.
12-Jan-12.........  GA            Brunswick.......  Brunswick Golden       1/4953      12/1/11  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                     Isles.                                      7, Amdt 1.
12-Jan-12.........  PA            Selinsgrove.....  Penn Valley.....       1/4954      12/1/11  VOR A, Amdt 7.
12-Jan-12.........  PA            Selinsgrove.....  Penn Valley.....       1/4955      12/1/11  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                17, Orig.
12-Jan-12.........  FL            Orlando.........  Orlando Sanford        1/5827      12/1/11  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                     Intl.                                       9R, Orig-B.
12-Jan-12.........  FL            Orlando.........  Orlando Sanford        1/5828      12/1/11  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                     Intl.                                       9L, Amdt 2B.
12-Jan-12.........  FL            Orlando.........  Orlando Sanford        1/5829      12/1/11  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                     Intl.                                       9L, Amdt 3A.
12-Jan-12.........  FL            Orlando.........  Orlando Sanford        1/5830      12/1/11  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                     Intl.                                       27R, Amdt 1A.
12-Jan-12.........  FL            Orlando.........  Orlando Sanford        1/5831      12/1/11  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                     Intl.                                       27R, Amdt 1B.
12-Jan-12.........  FL            Orlando.........  Orlando Sanford        1/5832      12/1/11  NDB B, Orig-A.
                                                     Intl.
12-Jan-12.........  FL            Orlando.........  Orlando Sanford        1/5833      12/1/11  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                     Intl.                                       9R, Orig-A.
12-Jan-12.........  FL            Orlando.........  Orlando Sanford        1/5835      12/1/11  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                     Intl.                                       18, Orig-A.
12-Jan-12.........  FL            Orlando.........  Orlando Sanford        1/5836      12/1/11  NDB C, Orig-A.
                                                     Intl.
12-Jan-12.........  MA            Beverly.........  Beverly Muni....       1/6016      12/1/11  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                16, Amdt 1.
12-Jan-12.........  VA            South Boston....  Willam M Tuck...       1/6226      12/1/11  Takeoff Minimums
                                                                                and Obstacle
                                                                                DP, Amdt 3.
12-Jan-12.........  NC            Mount Airy......  Mount Airy/Surry       1/6390      12/1/11  NDB RWY 36, Orig-
                                                     County.                                     A.
12-Jan-12.........  MO            Kansas City.....  Charles B.             1/6613      12/1/11  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                     Wheeler                                     19, Amdt 22A.
                                                     Downtown.
12-Jan-12.........  NV            Las Vegas.......  Mc Carran Intl..       1/6652      12/1/11  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                                                25R, Amdt 17.

12-Jan-12.........  NV            Las Vegas.......  Mc Carran Intl..       1/6653      12/1/11  ILS OR LOC/DME
                                                                                RWY 1L, Orig-A.
12-Jan-12.........  NV            Las Vegas.......  Mc Carran Intl..       1/6654      12/1/11  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                1R, Amdt 1.
12-Jan-12.........  NV            Las Vegas.......  Mc Carran Intl..       1/6655      12/1/11  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                19R, Amdt 1.
12-Jan-12.........  NV            Las Vegas.......  Mc Carran Intl..       1/6656      12/1/11  VOR RWY 25L/R,
                                                                                Amdt 3.
12-Jan-12.........  NV            Las Vegas.......  Mc Carran Intl..       1/6657      12/1/11  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                19L, Amdt 1.
12-Jan-12.........  NV            Las Vegas.......  Mc Carran Intl..       1/6658      12/1/11  VOR/DME A, Orig-
                                                                                C.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2011-32498 Filed 12-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: August 10, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 154)]
[Notices]
[Page 45030]
[DOCID:fr10au07-65]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EL05-25-004; EL05-26-004; EL05-27-004]

Tenaska Alabama II Partners, L.P. v. Alabama Power Company and
Southern Company Services, Inc.; Tenaska Alabama Partners, L.P. v.
Alabama Power Company and Southern Company Services, Inc.; Tenaska
Georgia Partners, L.P. v. Georgia Power Company and Southern Company
Services, Inc.; Notice of Filing

August 6, 2007.
    Take notice that on July 25, 2007, Southern Company Services, Inc.,
for itself and as agent for Alabama Power Company and Georgia Power
Company, and Tenaska Georgia Partners, L.P., filed compliance filings
pursuant to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Order issued on
June 25, 2007, Tenaska Alabama II Partners, L.P., et al., v. Alabama
Power Company, et al., 119 FERC ] 61,315 (2007).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on August 15, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-15640 Filed 8-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 225 (Friday, November 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67458-67459]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25849]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP20-908-004.
    Applicants: Alliance Pipeline L.P.
    Description: Alliance Pipeline L.P. submits tariff filing per
154.501: Alliance RP20-908 Refund Report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 11/10/21.
    Accession Number: 20211110-5197.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-329-000.
    Applicants: National Grid LNG, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2021-11-18 Order 587-Z. Compliance
Filing Adopting NAESB WQC Version 3.2 to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/18/21.
    Accession Number: 20211118-5176.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/30/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-330-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Filing--
Luminant Energy Company LLC to be effective 12/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 11/19/21.
    Accession Number: 20211119-5000.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 12/1/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-331-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Non-Conforming--Leidy South--
In-Svc--Cabot/Coterra to be effective 12/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 11/19/21.
    Accession Number: 20211119-5001.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 12/1/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-332-000.
    Applicants: Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: Annual Cash-Out Activity Report
2021 to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 11/19/21.
    Accession Number: 20211119-5067.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 12/1/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-333-000.
    Applicants: Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: Annual Operational Flow Order
Report 2021 to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 11/19/21.
    Accession Number: 20211119-5072.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 12/1/21.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP20-614-006.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Refund Report: Cash Out Refund Report Supplement
Docket Nos. RP20-614 & RP20-618 to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 11/19/21.
    Accession Number: 20211119-5022.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 12/1/21.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must
file in

accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR
385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 19, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-25849 Filed 11-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 51 (Monday, March 16, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14789-14791]
[FR Doc No: 2020-05255]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0861; Product Identifier 2019-NM-129-AD; Amendment
39-19864; AD 2020-05-14]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus SAS Model A320-214, -232, and -271N airplanes, and Model
A321-231 airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of a production
line inspection finding of damage on a main landing

gear (MLG) side stay attachment outboard lug. This AD requires an
inspection for discrepancies of the MLG side stay attachment outboard
lugs, left-hand and right-hand sides, and applicable corrective action,
as specified in a European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD,
which is incorporated by reference. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective April 20, 2020.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 20,
2020.

ADDRESSES: For the material incorporated by reference (IBR) in this AD,
contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 89990 1000; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA website
at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this IBR material at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. It is also available in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2019-0861.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0861; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2019-0167, dated July 15, 2019
(``EASA AD 2019-0167'') (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Airbus SAS Model A320-214, -232, and -271N
airplanes, and Model A321-231 airplanes.
    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Airbus SAS
Model A320-214,-232, and -271N airplanes, and Model A321-231 airplanes.
The NPRM published in the Federal Register on November 1, 2019 (84 FR
58634). The NPRM was prompted by report of a production line inspection
finding of damage on a MLG side stay attachment outboard lug.
Investigation results determined that the detected damage had been
caused by using incorrect tooling, and identified a batch of affected
parts that may have received the same treatment. The NPRM proposed to
require an inspection for discrepancies of the MLG side stay attachment
outboard lugs, left-hand and right-hand sides, and applicable
corrective action as specified in an EASA AD.
    The FAA is issuing this AD to address damaged MLG side stay
attachment outboard lugs, which could reduce the structural integrity
of the attachment of the MLG to the wing. See the MCAI for additional
background information.

Comments

    The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule. The FAA has considered the comments
received. Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA) and Darcy
Mraz support the intent of the NPRM.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments
received, and determined that air safety and the public interest
require adopting this final rule as proposed, except for minor
editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related IBR Material Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2019-0167 describes procedures for an inspection for
discrepancies (cracks, wear, damage, and corrosion) of the MLG side
stay attachment outboard lugs, left-hand and right-hand sides, and
corrective action (repair). This material is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 1 airplane of U.S. registry.
The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
121 work-hours x $85 per hour = $10,285......................              $0          $10,285          $10,285
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has received no definitive data that would enable the FAA
to provide cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in
this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2020-05-14 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39-19864; Docket No. FAA-2019-0861;
Product Identifier 2019-NM-129-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective April 20, 2020.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus SAS Model A320-214, -232, -271N
airplanes, and Model A321-231 airplanes, certificated in any
category, as identified in European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2019-0167, dated July 15, 2019 (``EASA AD 2019-0167'').

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report of a production line inspection
finding of damage on a main landing gear (MLG) side stay attachment
outboard lug. The FAA is issuing this AD to address damaged MLG side
stay attachment outboard lugs, which could reduce the structural
integrity of the attachment of the MLG to the wing.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD: Comply
with all required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2019-0167.

(h) Exception to EASA AD 2019-0167

    The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2019-0167 does not apply to
this AD.

(i) No Reporting Requirement

    Although the service information referenced in EASA AD 2019-0167
specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, and
specifies that action as ``RC'' (required for compliance), this AD
does not include that requirement.

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (k) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus SAS's
EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the
approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): For any service information
referenced in EASA AD 2019-0167 that contains RC procedures and
tests: Except as required by paragraph (2) of EASA AD 2019-0167 and
paragraphs (i) and (j)(2) of this AD, RC procedures and tests must
be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests that are not
identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and tests that
are not identified as RC may be deviated from using accepted methods
in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection program
without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and
tests identified as RC can be done and the airplane can be put back
in an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or changes to
procedures or tests identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.

(k) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Sanjay Ralhan,
Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone
and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2019-0167,
dated July 15, 2019.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For information about EASA AD 2019-0167, contact the EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
89990 6017; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet www.easa.europa.eu.
You may find this EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
    (4) You may view this material at the FAA, Transport Standards
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. This
material may be found in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2019-0861.
    (5) You may view this material that is incorporated by reference
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on March 4, 2020.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-05255 Filed 3-13-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 224 (Monday, November 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 71990]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29940]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2011-0017; OMB No. 1660-0040]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request, Standard Flood Hazard Determination Form

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a correction to the previous notice that was published
on October 19, 2011, 76 FR 64957. FEMA is requesting revision of OMB
control number 1660-0040, FEMA Form 086-0-32 (previously FEMA Form 81-
93), Standard Flood Hazard Determination Form (SFHDF). The Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will submit the information
collection abstracted below to the Office of Management and Budget for
review and clearance in accordance with the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The submission will describe the
nature of the information collection, the categories of respondents,
the estimated burden (i.e., the time, effort and resources used by
respondents to respond) and cost, and the actual data collection
instruments FEMA will use.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before December 21, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the proposed information
collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget. Comments should be addressed to the Desk
Officer for the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection should be made to Director,
Records Management Division, 1800 South Bell Street, Arlington, VA
20598-3005, facsimile number<PHONE_NUMBER>, or email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA received two comments from two
commenters, the Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) and
the National Flood Determination Association (NFDA). ASFPM submitted
five suggestions. In Section I; box 2 (description of the collateral)
of the form, it was suggested that FEMA include a broader list of
descriptive information to assist those using and reading the form.
This has been done. In Section II; Part C; Box 3 (discussing the
Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) and Otherwise Protected Areas
(OPA), the commenter requested that FEMA clarify the information in
this area; FEMA has made this change. In Section II; Part D. FEMA has
restated the choice for when flood insurance is not required by the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 to encourage property owners to
remember there is still a flood risk outside the Special Flood Hazard
Areas (SFHA) as requested.
    FEMA was not able to make two other suggested changes, both
involved information that might not be readily available to the entity
that fills out the form, and in one instance there were concerns about
privacy issues.
    The second commenter, NFDA, requested to see the FEMA planned
changes prior to final publication, noting that they believe an
extension of the Standard Flood Hazard Determination Form, SFHDF
without change is acceptable. The changes will be available to the
public when those changes are published in the Federal Register.

Collection of Information

    Title: Standard Flood Hazard Determination Form.
    Type of information collection: Revision of a currently approved
collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-0040.
    Form Titles and Numbers: FEMA Form 086-0-32 (previously FEMA Form
81-93), Standard Flood Hazard Determination Form (SFHDF).
    Abstract: FEMA Form 086-0-32 (previously FEMA Form 81-93), SFHDF is
used by regulated lending institutions, federal agency lenders, related
lenders/regulators, and the Government. Federally regulated lending
institutions complete this form when making, increasing, extending,
renewing or purchasing each loan for the purpose is of determining
whether flood insurance is required and available. The form may also be
used by property owner, insurance agents, realtors, community officials
for flood insurance related documentation.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 46,456,460.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Average Hour Burden per Respondent: Standard Flood Hazard
Determination Form (SFHDF), 20 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 15,330,632 hours.
    Estimated Cost: There are no operation and maintenance, or capital
and start-up costs associated with this collection of information.

Gary L. Anderson,
Acting Chief Administrative Officer, Mission Support Bureau, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2011-29940 Filed 11-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-11-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 17, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8240-8242]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03062]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2014-1112; Airspace Docket No. 14-ANM-16]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of VOR Federal Airway V-330 in the Vicinity of Mountain
Home, Idaho

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule, technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends VHF Omnidirectional Range (VOR) Federal
Airway V-330 in the vicinity of Mountain Home, ID. The FAA is taking
this action to correct the V-330 description contained in Part 71 to
ensure it matches the information contained in the FAA's aeronautical
database, matches the depiction on the associated charts, and promotes
safety and efficiency within the National Airspace System (NAS).

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, April 30, 2015. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA

Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. The Order is also available for
inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call
(202) 741-6030, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15. For further
information, you can contact the Airspace Policy and Regulations Group,
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Airspace Policy and
Regulations Group, Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    After a recent review of aeronautical data, the legal description
for V-330 published in FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, did not match the airway information contained in the
FAA's aeronautical database or the charted depiction of the airway. In
2004, the FAA received a request from the U.S. Air Force to change the
name and identifier of the Mountain Home, ID, VOR due to safety of
flight concerns. At that time, Mountain Home Air Force Base (AFB), an
on-base Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN) navigation aid (NAVAID), and a
VOR located 5.5 nautical miles (NM) off-base all shared the same
Mountain Home name and MUO identifier.
    An event involving a KC-135 aircraft navigating to conduct aerial
refueling (AR) activities highlighted the potential flight safety
issue. While navigating to one of the AR tracks south of Mountain Home
AFB, the flight crew entered ``MUO'' as the reference fix. The flight
computer indicated two fixes identified as MUO. The crew, not familiar
with the area, spent considerable time determining which NAVAID to use.
As a result of this hazard to navigation and flight safety issue of
having two navigation aids located 5.5 NM apart with the same name and
identifier, the USAF requested the Mountain Home VOR (MUO) be renamed
Liberator VOR with a new identifier of LTR.
    In response, the FAA amended the aeronautical database information
changing the Mountain Home VOR name to Liberator VOR and changing the
MUO identifier to LIA, in lieu of LTR, effective September 30, 2004.
The associated charts were published with the amended information, but
the rulemaking action to amend the V-330 legal description to reflect
the amendment was inadvertently overlooked at that time.
    To overcome confusion and flight safety issues associated with the
conflicting published V-330 airway description, the FAA is amending the
legal description to reflect the Mountain Home VOR name change to
Liberator VOR. Since this is an administrative correction to update the
V-330 description to be in concert with the FAA's aeronautical database
and charting, notice and public procedure under Title 5 U.S.C. 553(b)
are unnecessary.
    VOR Federal airways are listed in paragraph 6010 of FAA Order
7400.9Y dated August 6, 2014, and effective September 15, 2014, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The VOR Federal airway
listed in this document will be revised subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.9Y, airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2014, and effective September 15,
2014. FAA Order 7400.9Y is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this final rule. FAA Order 7400.9Y lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    The FAA amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part
71 by modifying the legal description of VOR Federal airway V-330 in
the vicinity of Mountain Home, ID. Specifically, the FAA amends V-330,
renaming the Mountain Home, ID, VOR to reflect the Liberator, ID, VOR;
thus, matching the information currently contained in the FAA's
aeronautical database and the charted depiction of the airway.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so
minimal. Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, does not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it amends an existing VOR Federal airway within the NAS.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with 311a, FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures.'' This airspace action is not expected to cause any
potentially significant environmental impacts, and no extraordinary
circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an environmental
assessment.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Y,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2014, and
effective September 15, 2014, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6010 VOR Federal Airways

    (a) Domestic VOR Federal airways.
* * * * *

V-330

    From Wildhorse, OR; Boise, ID; INT Boise 130[deg] and Liberator,
ID, 084[deg] radials; to INT Liberator 084[deg] and Burley, ID,
323[deg] radials. From Idaho Falls, ID; Jackson, WY; Dunoir, WY;
Riverton, WY; to Muddy Mountain, WY.

    Issued in Washington, DC, February 6, 2015.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace Policy and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2015-03062 Filed 2-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 236 (Monday, December 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 73919]
[FR Doc No: 2013-29252]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2013-59]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to
improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of
FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the
inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to
affect the legal status of the petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before December 30, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by Docket Number FAA-2013-
0795 using any of the following methods:
     Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to the Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
     Fax: Fax comments to the Docket Management Facility at
202-493-2251.
     Hand Delivery: Bring comments to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Privacy: We will post all comments we receive, without change, to
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. Using the search function of our docket Web site, anyone can
find and read the comments received into any of our dockets, including
the name of the individual sending the comment (or signing the comment
for an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
    Docket: To read background documents or comments received, go to
http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Brian Hancock, Flight Test Pilot,
Project Support (ACE-112), Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, FAA; telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax number
(816) 329-4090, email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 3, 2013.
Lirio Liu,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition For Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2013-0795.
    Petitioner: Cirrus Design Corporation.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 23.177(b).
    Description of Relief Sought: Petitioner requests relief from
static directional and lateral stability requirements for its Cirrus
model SR20 aircraft. The aircraft were manufactured with a wing design
that required a rudder aileron interconnect (RAI) to comply with
requirements of section 23.177(b); however, flight tests with use of a
roll trim system in lieu of the RAI show a level of safety at least
equal to the intent of the static lateral stability requirements of
that section.

[FR Doc. 2013-29252 Filed 12-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 33148]
[FR Doc No: 2023-10924]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2023-N-0687]

Abbott Laboratories Pharmaceutical Products Division; Withdrawal
of Approval of New Drug Applications for CYLERT (Pemoline) Tablets,
18.75 Milligrams, 37.5 Milligrams, and 75 Milligrams, and CYLERT
(Pemoline) Chewable Tablets, 37.5 Milligrams

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is
withdrawing approval of new drug application (NDA) 016832 for CYCLERT
(pemoline) tablets, 18.75 milligrams (mg), 37.5 mg, and 75 mg, as well
as NDA 017703 for CYCLERT (pemoline) chewable tablets, 37.5 mg, held by
Abbott Laboratories Pharmaceutical Products Division, c/o G&L
Scientific, 25 Independence Blvd., 4th Floor, Warren, NJ 07059
(Abbott). Abbott requested that approval of these applications be
withdrawn and has waived its opportunity for a hearing.

DATES: Approval is withdrawn as of May 23, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Lehrfeld, Office of
Regulatory Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6226,
Silver Spring, MD 20993,<PHONE_NUMBER>, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 27, 1975, FDA approved NDA 016832
for CYLERT (pemoline) tablets, 18.75 mg, 37.5 mg, and 75 mg, for use in
the treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). On
January 30, 1976, the Agency approved NDA 017703 for CYLERT (pemoline)
chewable tablets, 37.5 mg, for use in the treatment of ADHD. On October
24, 2005, FDA issued a Postmarket Drug Safety Information for Patients
and Providers communication entitled ``Information for Healthcare
Professionals: Pemoline Tablets and Chewable Tablets (Marketed as
CYLERT)'' which concluded the overall liver toxicity risk of CYLERT
(pemoline) (NDAs 016832 and 017703) and generic pemoline products
outweighed the benefits of these products (https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171114124349/https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm126461.htm).
    All holders of approved applications for pemoline products,
including Abbott, ceased marketing the products at that time. On April
12, 2021, FDA contacted Abbott and requested the company submit a
request for FDA to withdraw approval of NDAs 016832 and 017703 for
CYLERT tablets and CYLERT chewable tablets, respectively, pursuant to
Sec.  314.150(d) (21 CFR 314.150(d)) due to the risk of liver toxicity.
On September 2, 2021, Abbott requested that FDA withdraw approval of
CYLERT (pemoline) tablets and CYLERT (pemoline) chewable tablets, NDAs
016832 and 017703, respectively, under Sec.  314.150(d) and waived its
opportunity for a hearing.
    For the reasons discussed above, and in accordance with the
applicant's request, approval of NDAs 016832 and 017703 for CYLERT
(pemoline) tablets, 18.75 mg, 37.5 mg, and 75 mg, and CYLERT (pemoline)
chewable tablets, 37.5 mg, respectively, and all amendments and
supplements thereto, is withdrawn under Sec.  314.150(d). Distribution
of CYLERT (pemoline) tablets, 18.75 mg, 37.5 mg, and 75 mg, and CYLERT
(pemoline) chewable tablets, 37.5 mg, into interstate commerce without
an approved application is illegal and subject to regulatory action
(see sections 505(a) and 301(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355(a) and 331(d))).

    Dated: May 17, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-10924 Filed 5-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 42 (Monday, March 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14122-14126]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04825]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2011-0054]

Revocation of Permanent Variances

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice of revocation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: With this notice, OSHA is revoking twenty-four (24) obsolete
variances. Between 1975 and 1977, OSHA granted permanent variances to
24 companies engaged in the construction of cylindrical steel tanks.
The variances specified several conditions that served as an
alternative means of compliance to the falling-object-protection and
fall-protection requirements of the standard governing general
requirements for scaffolds in effect during this period. In 1996, OSHA
revised its scaffolds standards for construction to include provisions
that essentially duplicated the conditions specified by these
variances. Therefore, OSHA believes the alternative means of compliance
granted by the variances is no longer necessary and is revoking the
variances.
    Based on comments received in response to a December 19, 2011,
notice proposing to revoke these variances (76 FR 78698), on August 7,
2012, OSHA published a notice in the Federal Register correcting
several cross references in OSHA's scaffolds standards for construction
(77 FR 46948). Today's notice revoking the variances takes into
consideration these newly corrected cross references.

DATES: The effective date of the revocation of the permanent variances
is March 4, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
General information and press inquiries. Frank Meilinger, Director,
OSHA Office of Communications, Room N-3647, U.S. Department of Labor,
200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202)
693-1999.
Technical information. Stefan Weisz, Office of Technical Programs and
Coordination Activities, Room N-3655, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor,
200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202)
693-2110; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Copies of this Federal Register notice. Electronic copies of this
notice are available at http://www.regulations.gov. Electronic copies
of this notice, as well as news releases and other relevant
information, are available on OSHA's Web site at http://www.osha.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    OSHA's general requirements for scaffolds used in the construction
industry are set forth at 29 CFR 1926.451. OSHA adopted this standard
from Section 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act
(Construction Safety Act) (40 U.S.C. 3704) under Section 6(a) of the
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act; 29 U.S.C. 651,
655) in 1971 (see 36 FR 7340). Paragraphs (a)(4) and (a)(5) of Sec.
1926.451 required employers to erect, on scaffolds more than 10 feet
above the ground or floor, toeboards having a minimum height of four
inches on all open sides and open ends of the platforms. These
requirements prevented tools and other equipment from falling from the
scaffold and striking employees below. To ensure the structural
integrity of scaffolds, Sec.  1926.451(a)(5) required employers to
erect guardrail supports at intervals not to exceed eight feet, while
Table L-3 in Sec.  1926.451(a)(10) set maximum permissible spans for 2-
inch x 10-inch (or wider) planks.
    Between 1975 and 1977, OSHA granted 24 permanent variances from the
falling-object-protection and fall-protection requirements in Sec.
1926.451(a)(4), (a)(5), and (a)(10) to employers using scaffolds in the
construction of cylindrical steel tanks. Construction of these tanks
involves attaching curved steel plates together to form the outer
surface of a tank. After attaching a horizontal layer (ring) of steel
plates around the circumference of the existing shell, employees raise
the scaffolds to attach the next ring of steel plates onto the existing
shell. Steel mills typically fabricate the steel plates to a standard
length. After delivery of the steel plates to a worksite, and prior to
attaching the plates to form the outer surface of a tank, employers
attach scaffolding and guardrail supports to brackets welded onto the
steel plates. The standard length and radius of the steel plates make
it difficult for employers to properly space scaffolding and guardrail
supports as specified by Sec.  1926.451. To address this problem,
employers developed special procedures and methods, including special
scaffolding that is more mobile, flexible, and holds fewer workers than
conventional scaffolding.

A. Alternative Means of Compliance Specified in the 24 Variances

    The variances OSHA granted to the 24 employers did not require
scaffolds used in the construction of cylindrical steel tanks to have
the toeboards required by Sec.  1926.451(a)(4) and (a)(5). Instead, the
variances specified that the employers must implement the following
conditions as an alternative means of compliance: (1) Ensure that
employees keep loose tools and equipment in secure, well-designed
containers; and (2) use ropes to demarcate the area below the scaffold
and post clearly visible signs indicating ``overhead work above.'' The
variances also stated that no more than three employees could work on a
10\1/2\-foot plank at any time.
    Since the contour of the steel plates on a tank's outer surface is
curved, and the adjacent edge of the scaffold is straight, there is an
open space between them. As a result, the variances provided for the
installation of a taut wire rope between the innermost edge of the
scaffold and the curved plate of a tank's outer surface to serve as a
safety line in place of a guardrail assembly. In the event the open
space on either side of the rope exceeded 12 inches, the

employer had to install a second wire rope or guardrail. Also, the
variances set 10\1/2\ feet as the maximum distance between brackets
used to attach scaffolding and guardrail supports and stated that
employers had to weld such brackets to the steel plates.
    Additionally, the variances required employers to use scaffold
planks of rough full-dimensioned 2-inch x 12-inch x 12-foot Douglas Fir
or Southern Yellow Pine of Select Structural Grade. The Douglas Fir
planking had to have at least a 1,900 fiber stress and 1,900,000
modulus of elasticity, while the Yellow Pine planking had to have at
least 2,500 fiber stress and 2,000,000 modulus of elasticity. Employers
had to secure all planking from movement or overlap it in accordance
with Sec.  1926.451(a)(12). The variances also required that employers
construct guardrails of taut wire rope and support the guardrails using
angle irons attached to brackets welded to the steel plates. These
guardrails had to be at least equivalent in strength, stability, and
height to the 2-inch x 4-inch x 8-foot wooden rails addressed in Sec.
1926.451(a)(5). Finally, the variances required employers to space
guardrail supports at intervals no greater than 10\1/2\ feet apart.

B. OSHA's Current Standard

    On August 30, 1996, OSHA issued a final rule revising its
construction safety standards regulating the design, construction, and
use of scaffolds (61 FR 46026). In the preamble to the final rule, OSHA
stated that it was updating its scaffolds standards in construction
and, when possible, establishing performance-oriented criteria to
protect employees from scaffold-related hazards such as falls, falling
objects, structural instability, electrocution, and overloading. OSHA
also explained that it was not issuing specific requirements for the
tank-building industry because the Agency believed it addressed
adequately the requirements for tank scaffolds under the general
provisions of the final rule (see 61 FR 46033). In this regard, the
final rule revised the requirements in Sec.  1926.451(a)(4), (a)(5),
and (a)(10). These revisions are set forth in Sec.  1926.451, as well
as non-mandatory Appendix A of 29 CFR part 1926, subpart L.
    OSHA's current standard at Sec.  1926.451(h) addresses the
protection of employees from scaffold-related falling-object hazards.
Section 1926.451(h)(1) requires employers to ensure that employees
working on scaffolds wear hardhats and to protect these employees from
falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects. Section
1926.451(h)(2) sets forth several options for employers to use to
prevent tools, materials, or equipment from falling from a scaffold and
striking employees below. Paragraphs (h)(2)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), and
(v) of Sec.  1926.451 specify these options, respectively, as follows:
(1) Using barricades on lower levels to exclude employees from areas
where falling objects might land; (2) erecting toeboards along the edge
of platforms for a distance sufficient to protect workers below, when
the platforms are more than 10 feet above lower levels; (3) erecting
paneling or screening when tools or other materials piled on the
platform reach a height higher than the top edge of a toeboard; (4)
installing a guardrail system designed so that the openings will
prevent the passage of falling objects; and (5) installing debris nets,
catch platforms, or canopies to protect workers below scaffolds from
falling objects.
    Appendix A to subpart L addresses scaffold specifications and
provides non-mandatory guidance to assist employers in complying with
the requirements in subpart L. Paragraph (z) of this appendix provides
guidance regarding the use of tank builders' scaffolds. In the preamble
to the 1996 final rule, OSHA noted that the introductory text of the
appendix clearly indicates that employers following the appendix will
be in compliance with the requirements of the standard that pertain to
scaffolds used in the construction of cylindrical tanks. However, OSHA
stated further that employers choosing not to follow the appendix still
must comply with applicable requirements in Sec.  1926.451,
particularly paragraphs (a) and (f) (see 61 FR 46033).

II. Comments on the Proposed Revocation of Variances

    OSHA published a proposed revocation of the permanent variances in
the Federal Register on December 19, 2011 (76 FR 78698). The notice
invited interested parties, including the 24 companies engaged in the
construction of cylindrical steel tanks granted the permanent
variances, and affected employees, to submit written data, views, and
arguments regarding the proposed revocation. The notice also included a
table comparing the conditions specified in the 24 variances with the
analogous paragraphs in OSHA's current Sec.  1926451 and Appendix A to
29 CFR part 1926, subpart L. In addition, the Federal Register notice
stated that interested parties could request a hearing on the proposed
revocation of the permanent variances. OSHA did not receive any
requests for a hearing.
    OSHA received one comment on the proposed revocation. Mr. Donald
Lowe of Tampa Tank, Inc., submitted a comment requesting clarification
of the table comparing the variance conditions with OSHA's current
standard at Sec.  1926.451 and Appendix A to 29 CFR part 1926, subpart
L (see Document ID No. OSHA-2011-0054-0001 \1\). The comment indicated
that paragraphs (z)(3) and (z)(5) in Appendix A incorrectly refer to
guardrail requirements in Sec.  1926.451(e)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In Docket No. OSHA-2011-0054 for this revocation action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. OSHA's Corrected Standard

    OSHA published a correction notice addressing its standards on
respiratory protection, mechanical power presses, and scaffold
specifications in the Federal Register on August 7, 2012 (77 FR 46948).
This notice included correcting a cross reference made in two
paragraphs in Appendix A to 29 CFR part 1926, subpart L, which specify
requirements for tank builders' scaffolds. Specifically, when OSHA
published its 1996 final rule addressing scaffolds standards in
construction, paragraphs (z)(3) and (z)(5) in Appendix A referred to
guardrail requirements in Sec.  1926.451(e)(4). However, the
requirements at Sec.  1926.451(e)(4) contain provisions for stair
towers; these provisions are not applicable to tank builders'
scaffolds. The reference cited in paragraphs (z)(3) and (z)(5) should
be to paragraph Sec.  1926.451(g)(4), which addresses in part guardrail
systems for tank builders' scaffolds. Accordingly, the August 7, 2012,
Federal Register notice corrected paragraphs (z)(3) and (z)(5) of
Appendix A to refer to Sec.  1926.451(g)(4).
    Because of the August 7, 2011, correction, it is important to state
exactly what tank builders must do to be in compliance with Appendix A.
Paragraph (z)(1) of Appendix A states that the maximum distance between
the brackets used to attach the scaffolding and guardrail supports
shall be no more than 10\1/2\ feet, while paragraph (z)(2) provides
that no more than three employees shall occupy a 10\1/2\-foot scaffold
plank at any time. Paragraph (z)(3) requires that employers install a
taut wire or synthetic rope supported on the scaffold brackets at the
scaffold-plank level between the innermost edge of the scaffold
platform and the curved plates of the tank's outer surface; this wire
or rope serves as a safety line in place of an inner guardrail assembly
when the space between the scaffold platform and the tank exceeds 12
inches. If the space on either side of the

wire or rope exceeds 12 inches, employers must install a second wire or
synthetic rope in an appropriate location, or install guardrails in
accordance with Sec.  1926.451(g)(4), to reduce the open space to less
than 12 inches.
    Additionally, paragraph (z)(4) provides that employers must use
scaffold planks of rough full-dimensioned 2-inch x 12-inch Douglas Fir
or Southern Yellow Pine of Select Structural Grade. Douglas Fir planks
must have a fiber stress of at least 1,900 lb/m\2\ and a modulus of
elasticity of at least 1,900,000 lb/m\2\, while Yellow Pine planks must
have a fiber stress of at least 2,500 lb/m\2\ and a modulus of
elasticity of at least 2,000,000 lb/m\2\. Finally, paragraph (z)(5)
states that employers must construct guardrails of a taut wire or
synthetic rope, and support these guardrails using angle irons attached
to brackets welded to the steel plates. These guardrails must comply
with Sec.  1926.451(g)(4), and employers must space the guardrail
supports at intervals no greater than 10\1/2\ feet apart.

IV. Other Corrections

    Condition (8) or (h) from the comparison table in the December 19,
2011, Federal Register notice proposing to revoke the variances
included a reference to 29 CFR 1926.451(a)(15). This condition states:
``Guardrails shall be constructed of taut wire rope, and shall be
supported by angle irons attached to brackets welded to the steel
plates. These guardrails shall be at least of equivalent strength,
stability and height as those required for the 8 foot span of
2 x 4 wood rails by 29 CFR 1926.451(a)(15).
Guardrail supports shall be located at no greater than 10[foot]
6 intervals.''
    OSHA notes that condition (8) from most of the tank-builder
variances granted between 1975 and 1977 reference OSHA's former
scaffolding standard at Sec.  1926.451(a)(5). The one exception is a
variance granted to the Baker Tank Company on August 9, 1977 (42 FR
40269), which references Sec.  1926.451(a)(15). Former Sec.
1926.451(a)(15) states, ``The poles, legs, or uprights of scaffolds
shall be plumb, and securely and rigidly braced to prevent swaying and
displacement,'' while former Sec.  1926.451(a)(5) states, ``Guardrails
shall be 2 x 4 inches or the equivalent, approximately 42 inches high,
with a midrail, when required. Supports shall be at intervals not to
exceed 8 feet. Toeboards shall be a minimum of 4 inches in height.''
    The reference to Sec.  1926.451(a)(15) in condition (8) of the 1977
Baker Tank Company variance is incorrect. OSHA used the conditions from
the 1977 Baker Tank Company variance to develop the comparison table
used in its December 19, 2011, variance-revocation notice. As a result,
condition (8) or (h) of that table incorporated the incorrect reference
(to Sec.  1926.451(a)(15)). Accordingly, OSHA modified variance
condition (8) or (h) in the comparison table below to reference Sec.
1926.451(a)(5) instead of Sec.  1926.451(a)(15).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The comparison table below also corrects the reference to
Sec.  1926.451(e)(4) to Sec.  1926.451(g)(4), as discussed in the
previous section of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following table compares the conditions specified in the 24
variances with the analogous paragraphs of the current corrected
provisions in Sec.  1926.451 and Appendix A of 29 CFR part 1926,
subpart L.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Provision in current Sec.
           Variance condition             1926.451 and appendix A of 29
                                             CFR Part 1926, subpart L
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Condition (1) or (a): The applicants'    1926.451(h)(1): In addition to
 loose tools and equipment shall be       wearing hardhats, each
 kept in well-designed tool containers.   employee on a scaffold shall
 This does not include fitup bars, key    be provided with additional
 plates, key channels, or long handled    protection from falling hand
 mauls which may be placed on the         tools, debris, and other small
 scaffold plank during the time they      objects through the
 are required for work. The loose tool    installation of toeboards,
 containers shall be secured to prevent   screens, or guardrail systems,
 their upset or dislodgment from the      or through the erection of
 scaffold area.                           debris nets, catch platforms,
                                          or canopy structures that
                                          contain or deflect the falling
                                          objects. When the falling
                                          objects are too large, heavy
                                          or massive to be contained or
                                          deflected by any of the above-
                                          listed measures, the employer
                                          shall place such potential
                                          falling objects away from the
                                          edge of the surface from which
                                          they could fall and shall
                                          secure those materials as
                                          necessary to prevent their
                                          falling.
Condition (2) or (b): Areas beneath and  1926.451(h)(2)(i): The area
 far enough away from the base of the     below the scaffold to which
 scaffold to contain anything that        objects can fall shall be
 falls from above shall be roped off      barricaded, and employees
 and posted with clearly visible signs    shall not be permitted to
 stating: ``Danger Overhead Work''.       enter the hazard area.
Condition (3) or (c): The space between  Appendix A, Paragraph (z)(3): A
 the innermost edge of the scaffold       taut wire or synthetic rope
 platform and the curved plate            supported on the scaffold
 structure of the tank shell shall not    brackets shall be installed at
 exceed 12'' without protective           the scaffold plank level
 measures. A taut wire rope supported     between the innermost edge of
 on scaffold brackets at plank level      the scaffold platform and the
 may be used to divide any space          curved plate structure of the
 exceeding 12'' in lieu of using a        tank shell to serve as a
 guardrail or tie-off system.             safety line in lieu of an
                                          inner guardrail assembly where
                                          the space between the scaffold
                                          platform and the tank exceeds
                                          12 inches (30.48 cm). In the
                                          event the open space on either
                                          side of the rope exceeds 12
                                          inches (30.48 cm), a second
                                          wire or synthetic rope
                                          appropriately placed, or
                                          guardrails in accordance with
                                          1926.451(g)(4), shall be
                                          installed in order to reduce
                                          that open space to less than
                                          12 inches (30.48 cm).
Condition (4) or (d): Not more than      Appendix A, Paragraph (z)(2):
 three employees shall be working on a    Not more than three employees
 10' 6'' span of scaffold planking at     shall occupy a 10 feet 6 inch
 any time.                                span of scaffold planking at
                                          any time.
Condition (5) or (e): The maximum        Appendix A, Paragraph (z)(1):
 distance between brackets to which       The maximum distance between
 scaffolding and guardrail supports are   brackets to which scaffolding
 attached shall be 10' 6''. These         and guardrail supports are
 brackets shall be welded to the steel    attached shall be no more than
 plates.                                  10 feet 6 inches.

Condition (6) or (f): Scaffold planks    Appendix A, Paragraph (z)(4):
 or rough full-dimensioned 2'' x 12'' x   Scaffold planks of rough full-
 12' Douglas Fir or equivalent            dimensioned 2-inch (5.1 cm) x
 planking, shall be used. The Douglas     12-inch (30.5 cm) Douglas Fir
 Fir shall have at least a 1,900 fiber    or Southern Yellow Pine of
 stress and 1,900,000 modulus of          Select Structural Grade shall
 elasticity. Three planks with full       be used. Douglas Fir planks
 thickness 2'' x 10'' x 12' dimensions    shall have a fiber stress of
 may be used in lieu of two 2'' x 12''    at least 1900 lb/in\2\
 x 12' planks provided that they are      (130,929 n/cm\2\) and a
 clamped or bonded together at the        modulus of elasticity of at
 midpoint of the span in order to         least 1,900,000 lb/in\2\
 spread the weight of the employees.      (130,929,000 n/cm\2\), while
                                          Yellow Pine planks shall have
                                          a fiber stress of at least
                                          2500 lb/in\2\ (172,275 n/cm\2\
                                          and a modulus of elasticity of
                                          at least 2,000,000 lb/in\2\)
                                          (137,820,000 n/cm\2\).
Condition (7) or (g): All planking       1926.451(f)(15)(ii): The
 shall be secured from movement or        platform units shall be
 overlapped in accordance with            secured to the scaffold to
 1926.451(a)(12).                         prevent their movement;
Condition (8) or (h): Guardrails shall   Appendix A, Paragraph (z)(5):
 be constructed of taut wire rope, and    Guardrails shall be
 shall be supported by angle irons        constructed of a taut wire or
 attached to brackets welded to the       synthetic rope, and shall be
 steel plates. These guardrails shall     supported by angle irons
 be at least of equivalent strength,      attached to brackets welded to
 stability and height as those required   the steel plates. These
 for the 8 foot span of 2'' x 4'' wood    guardrails shall comply with
 rails by 29 CFR 1926.451(a)(5).          Sec.   1926.451(g)(4).
 Guardrail supports shall be located at   Guardrail supports shall be
 no greater than 10' 6'' intervals.       located at no greater than 10
                                          feet 6 inch intervals.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on the comparisons in the table contrasting the variance
conditions with the analogous paragraphs in the current standard for
scaffolds in construction, OSHA finds that current Sec.  1926.451 and
corrected Appendix A to 29 CFR part 1926, subpart L, which replaced the
standards from which the employers received the variances,
substantially duplicate the conditions specified by these variances,
and that the corrected standards and the variances impose equivalent
compliance burdens on employers. Accordingly, current Sec.  1926.451
and its associated appendix provide employees with protection that is
at least equal to the protection afforded to them by the conditions
specified by the variances.

V. Findings and Conclusions

    Based on its review of the record, including the corrections to the
references in Appendix A to 29 CFR part 1926, subpart L, OSHA finds
that current Sec.  1926.451 and its associated appendix provide
employees with protection that is at least equal to the protection
afforded to them by the conditions specified by the variances described
herein. Therefore, OSHA concludes that these variances are unnecessary,
and is revoking the variances and requiring employers to comply instead
with the appropriate provisions of Sec.  1926.451 and Appendix A to 29
CFR part 1926, subpart L.
    The following table provides information about the variances
revoked by this notice. Interested parties may refer to the Federal
Register cite in the table to obtain detailed information about the
variances.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Federal       OSHA Standards
  Name of employer (company) *           Variance No.           Date granted   Register  Cite     Affected **
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
American Bridge Division,        V-74-44, V-74-57............        05/06/75     40 FR 19715  1926.451(a)(4),
 United States Steel Corp.                                                                      (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
Baker Tank Company.............  V-77-7, V-77-1..............        08/09/77     42 FR 40269  1926.451(a)(4),
                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
Bethlehem Steel Corporation,     V-74-44, V-74-57............        05/06/75     40 FR 19715  1926.451(a)(4),
 Fabricated Steel Construction                                                                  (a)(5), and
 Division.                                                                                (a)(10).
Brown Minneapolis Tank and       V-73-31, V-74-30............        04/04/75     40 FR 15139  1926.451(a)(4),
 Fabricating Co.                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
Caldwell Tanks, Inc............  V-73-31, V-74-30............        04/04/75     40 FR 15139  1926.451(a)(4),
                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Co...  V-73-31, V-74-30............        04/04/75     40 FR 15139  1926.451(a)(4),
                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.......  V-73-31, V-74-30............        04/04/75     40 FR 15139  1926.451(a)(4),
                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
Edwards Tank Erection, Inc.....  V-76-4, V-76-5..............        09/24/76     41 FR 41976  1926.451(a)(4),
                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
Fisher Tank and Welding Co.....  V-73-31, V-74-30............        04/04/75     40 FR 15139  1926.451(a)(4),
                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
General American Transportation  V-75-35.....................        04/27/76     41 FR 17642  1926.451(a)(4),
 Corporation.                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
Gorbett Brothers, Inc..........  V-75-35.....................        04/27/76     41 FR 17642  1926.451(a)(4),
                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co.  V-73-31, V-74-30............        04/04/75     40 FR 15139  1926.451(a)(4),
                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
Marathon Steel Co. (formerly     V-73-31, V-74-30............        04/04/75     40 FR 15139  1926.451(a)(4),
 Allison Steel Manufacturing                                                                    (a)(5), and
 Co.).                                                                                (a)(10).
Newport News Industrial          V-76-4, V-76-5..............        09/24/76     41 FR 41976  1926.451(a)(4),
 Corporation of Ohio.                                                                           (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
Nooter Corp....................  V-73-31, V-74-30............        04/04/75     40 FR 15139  1926.451(a)(4),
                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.  V-73-31, V-74-30............        04/04/75     40 FR 15139  1926.451(a)(4),
                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
Prairie Tank and Construction    V-75-35.....................        04/27/76     41 FR 17642  1926.451(a)(4),
 Company.                                                                                (5), and (10).
PSF Industries, Inc............  V-74-44, V-74-57............        05/06/75     40 FR 19715  1926.451(a)(4),
                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
Richmond Engineering Company,    V-77-7, V-77-1..............        08/09/77     42 FR 40269  1926.451(a)(4),
 Inc.                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
Tank Services, Inc.............  V-75-35.....................        04/27/76     41 FR 17642  1926.451(a)(4),
                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
The Bishopric Products, Co.....  V-73-31, V-74-30............        04/04/75     40 FR 15139  1926.451(a)(4),
                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
Universal Tank & Iron Works....  V-73-31, V-74-30............        04/04/75     40 FR 15139  1926.451(a)(4),
                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
Western Petro-Chem. Services,    V-73-31, V-74-30............        04/04/75     40 FR 15139  1926.451(a)(4),
 Inc.                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
Wyatt, Division U.S. Industries  V-73-31, V-74-30............        04/04/75     40 FR 15139  1926.451(a)(4),
                                                                                (a)(5), and
                                                                                (a)(10).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* As listed on the original variance.
** From OSHA's original scaffold standard issued in 1971.

VI. State-Plan States

    Twenty-two states administer OSHA-approved occupational safety and
health programs, or State Plans, that have jurisdiction over private-
sector employers within the state. These states are Alaska, Arizona,
California, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan,
Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Puerto Rico,
South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and
Wyoming. OSHA granted the 24 variances at issue under Federal authority
with nationwide applicability, without reference to the State Plans.
About the same time, the State-Plan states began to assume
responsibility for most occupational safety and health activities in
the state, including enforcement, standards development, and granting
variances. Accordingly, each State-Plan state adopted state scaffolding
standards that are identical to, or at least as effective as, the
current Federal standard at 29 CFR 1926.451. As OSHA is revoking the
variances described herein, affected employers operating in one or more
of these State-Plan states must determine if the applicable state
standards are identical to, or different from, the current OSHA
standard. If a State-Plan state standard differs from the OSHA
standard, these employers must either meet any state-specific
requirements in the state standard or apply directly to the applicable
State Plan Office for a variance from the state's standard. Information
on State Plans is available on OSHA's Web site at http://www.osha.gov/dcsp/osp/index.html, and includes links to each state's Web site, as
well as information on state-specific standards.

VII. Authority and Signature

    David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC, authorized the preparation of
this notice. OSHA is issuing this notice under the authority specified
by Section 6(d) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29
U.S.C. 655), Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012 (76 FR 3912), and 29
CFR part 1905.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on February 19, 2013.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2013-04825 Filed 3-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register: January 18, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 11)]
[Notices]
[Page 2273]
[DOCID:fr18ja07-54]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP07-15-001]

Central New York Oil and Gas Company, LLC; Notice of Compliance
Filing

January 10, 2007.
    Take notice that, on December 29, 2006, Central New York Oil And
Gas Company, LLC (CNYOG), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas
Tariff, Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, to become
effective February 1, 2007:

Third Revised Sheet No. 2
Second Revised Sheet No. 4
Second Revised Sheet No. 5
Second Revised Sheet No. 12
Original Sheet No. 12A
Second Revised Sheet No. 13
Second Revised Sheet No. 22
Second Revised Sheet No. 26
Second Revised Sheet No. 31
Second Revised Sheet No. 32
Second Revised Sheet No. 33
Second Revised Sheet No. 73
Second Revised Sheet No. 74
Second Revised Sheet No. 76
Third Revised Sheet No. 122
Third Revised Sheet No. 134
First Revised Sheet No. 140

    CNYOG states that the filing is being made to comply with the terms
of the Commission's order of December 21, 2006 in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a
protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons

unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 26, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-576 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P