[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11022-11024]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03543]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-91146; File No. SR-PEARL-2021-03]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange
Rule 200, Trading Permits

February 17, 2021.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\

notice is hereby given that on February 11, 2021, MIAX PEARL, LLC
(``MIAX PEARL'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') a proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing a proposed rule change to Exchange Rule
200(d) requiring membership in another national securities exchange or
association.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at http://www.miaxoptions.com/rule-filings/pearl at MIAX
PEARL's principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference
Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Exchange Rule
200(d) requiring membership in another national securities exchange or
association. In sum, Exchange Rule 200(d) currently requires that
Trading Permit \3\ holders be a member in another registered options
exchange, other than the Exchange's affiliates, the Miami International
Securities Exchange, LLC (``MIAX'') or MIAX Emerald, LLC (``Emerald''),
or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA'') where
such other registered options exchange has not been designated by the
Commission, pursuant to Rule 17d-1 under the Exchange Act, to examine
Members for compliance with financial responsibility rules. Exchange
Rule 200(d), therefore, does not allow a Trading Permit Holder that is
not a FINRA member \4\ to satisfy this requirement by being a member of
a registered equities exchange. The Exchange believes that requiring
membership in another registered options exchange is unnecessarily too
restrictive and is also not in line with similar membership
requirements at other exchanges.\5\ Therefore, to enable more broker-
dealers to become Trading Permit holders, the Exchange proposes to
amend Exchange Rule 200(d) to require membership in a registered
national securities exchange, rather than only registered options
exchanges.\6\ Exchange Rule 200(d) will continue to require Trading
Permit holders to be FINRA members where the registered national
securities exchange that they maintain membership is not designated by
the Commission to examine members for compliance with financial
responsibility rules pursuant to Rule 17d-1 of the Exchange Act.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The term ``Trading Permit'' means a permit issued by the
Exchange that confers the ability to transact on the Exchange. See
Exchange Rule 100.
    \4\ A Trading Permit Holder that does not transact business with
the public is not required to become a FINRA member. Section
15(b)(8) of the Act that requires members that transact business
with the public to be a member of FINRA. 15 U.S.C. 78o(b)(8).
    \5\ See Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``EDGX'') Rule 2.5(a)(4), Cboe
EDGA Exchange, Inc. (``EDGA'') Rule 2.5(a)(4), Cboe BZX Exchange,
Inc. (``BZX'') Rule 2.5(a)(4), Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (``BYX'',
collectively with EDGX, EDGA, and BZX, the ``Cboe Equity
Exchanges'') Rule 2.5(a)(4), MEMX LLC (``MEMX'') Rule 2.5(a)(4),
Investors Exchange, Inc. (``IEX'') Rule 2.130(a), Long Term Stock
Exchange, Inc. (``LTSE'') Rule 2.130 and BOX Exchange LLC (``BOX'')
Rule 2020(a).
    \6\ The Exchange also propose to include the phrase ``or FINRA''
at the end of Exchange Rule 200(d)'s title.
    \7\ Rule 17d-1 of the Act authorizes the Commission to name a
single Self-Regulatory Organization (``SRO'') as the Designated
Examining Authority (``DEA'') to examine members of more than one
SRO (``common member'') for compliance with the financial
responsibility requirements imposed by the Exchange Act, or by
Commission or SRO rules. 17 CFR 240.17d-1. The Exchange does not
currently act as the DEA for any Trading Permit holder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act,\8\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\9\
in particular, because it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would remove
impediments to, and perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market
and a national market system and, in general, protect investors and the
public interest by expanding the number of registered brokers-dealers
that would be eligible to become Trading Permit holders and trade on
the Exchange, while maintaining high regulatory standards and a
comprehensive regulatory regime with respect to such firms. Exchange
Rule 200(d) was too restrictive by limiting membership in another
registered national securities exchange to only registered options
exchanges and, therefore, unnecessarily precluded broker-dealers who
were members of a registered equities exchange from becoming Trading
Permit holders. As mentioned above, Exchange Rule 200(d) will continue
to require Trading Permit holders to be FINRA members where the
registered national securities exchange that they maintain membership
is not designated by the Commission to examine members for compliance
with financial responsibility rules pursuant to Rule 17d-1 of the
Exchange Act. This will ensure that those Trading Permit holders that
are not FINRA members maintain membership at a registered options or
equities exchange that may be designated as their DEA by the
Commission. The proposed rule change would also contribute to
perfecting the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, which outcomes are also consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest, by aligning the Exchange's
membership requirements more closely with those of other national
securities exchanges.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change would also not unfairly discriminate
between or among market participants because both current and
prospective Trading Permit holders would be subject to the rule. All
Trading Permit holders would be regulated in the same manner by the
Exchange should they be a member of another registered national options
or equities exchange.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose

any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is
designed to enhance competition by expanding the number of registered
brokers-dealers that would be eligible to become Trading Permit holders
and trade on the Exchange by aligning Exchange Rule 200(d) with that of
other national securities exchanges.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \12\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \14\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \15\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposed rule change may become operative immediately. The Exchange
states that waiver of the operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest because it will allow
the Exchange to immediately expand the number of registered broker-
dealers that would be eligible to become Trading Permit holders on the
Exchange and align its membership requirements more closely with those
of other national securities exchanges.\16\ For this reason, and
because the proposal does not raise any novel regulatory issues, the
Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.
Accordingly, the Commission hereby waives the operative delay and
designates the proposed rule change operative upon filing.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \16\ See supra note 5.
    \17\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission also has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-PEARL-2021-03 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PEARL-2021-03. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-PEARL-2021-03 and should be submitted on
or before March 16, 2021.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-03543 Filed 2-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71639-71641]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28243]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30986 Amdt. No. 3615]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are

designed to provide safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace
and to promote safe flight operations under instrument flight rules at
the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective December 3, 2014. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of December 3, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matters incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For Examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability--All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available
online free of charge. Visit http://www.nfdc.faa.gov to register.
Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP copies may
be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard A. Dunham III, Flight
Procedure Standards Branch (AFS-420), Flight Technologies and Programs
Divisions, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration,
Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd. Oklahoma
City, OK. 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by establishing,
amending, suspending, or revoking SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and/or ODPS.
The complete regulators description of each SIAP and its associated
Takeoff Minimums or ODP for an identified airport is listed on FAA form
documents which are incorporated by reference in this amendment under 5
U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 CFR part 97.20. The applicable FAA
Forms are FAA Forms 8260-3, 8260-4, 8260-5, 8260-15A, and 8260-15B when
required by an entry on 8260-15A.
    The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, in addition
to their complex nature and the need for a special format make
publication in the Federal Register expensive and impractical.
Furthermore, airmen do not use the regulatory text of the SIAPs,
Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead refer to their depiction on
charts printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. The advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP listed on
FAA forms is unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFRs and
specifies the types of SIAPs and the effective dates of the associated
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs. This amendment also identifies the airport
and its location, the procedure, and the amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP as contained in the
transmittal. Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and textual ODP amendments
may have been issued previously by the FAA in a Flight Data Center
(FDC) Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency action of immediate
flight safety relating directly to published aeronautical charts. The
circumstances which created the need for some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums
and ODP amendments may require making them effective in less than 30
days. For the remaining SIAPS and Takeoff Minimums and ODPS, an
effective date at least 30 days after publication is provided.
    Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPS contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these SIAPS and
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied to the
conditions existing or anticipated at the affected airports. Because of
the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and
public procedures before adopting these SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and
ODPs are impracticable and contrary to the public interest and, where
applicable, that good cause exists for making some SIAPs effective in
less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule '' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,1979); and
(3)does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR part 97

    Air Traffic Control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (Air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 24, 2014.
John Duncan,
Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) is amended by
establishing, amending, suspending, or revoking Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures and/or Takeoff Minimums and/or Obstacle Departure
Procedures effective at 0902 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

Effective 11 DECEMBER 2014

Louisville, KY, Louisville Intl-Standiford Field, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY
35R, Amdt 1B
Louisville, KY, Louisville Intl-Standiford Field, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY
35R, Orig-B
Starkville, MS, Oktibbeha, RNAV (GPS)-A, Orig
Starkville, MS, Oktibbeha, VOR OR GPS-B, Amdt 6A, CANCELED
Le Roy, NY, Le Roy, RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Orig-A

Effective 8 JANUARY 2015

Anchorage, AK, Ted Stevens Anchorage Intl, ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 7L,
ILS RWY 7L (SA CAT I), ILS RWY 7L (SA CAT II), Amdt 4
Anchorage, AK, Ted Stevens Anchorage Intl, ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 7R,
ILS RWY 7R (SA CAT I), ILS RWY 7R (CAT II), ILS RWY 7R (CAT III),
Amdt 4
Hartselle, AL, Hartselle-Morgan County Regional, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18,
Amdt 1
Hartselle, AL, Hartselle-Morgan County Regional, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36,
Amdt 1
Rialto, CA, Rialto Muni/Miro Fld/, NDB OR GPS-A, Amdt 4, CANCELED
Rialto, CA, Rialto Muni/Miro Fld/, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 3, CANCELED
Truckee, CA, Truckee-Tahoe, GPS RWY 19, Orig, CANCELED
Truckee, CA, Truckee-Tahoe, RNAV (GPS) RWY 11, Orig
Truckee, CA, Truckee-Tahoe, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 20, Orig
Truckee, CA, Truckee-Tahoe, RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 20, Orig
Truckee, CA, Truckee-Tahoe, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 5
Truckee, CA, Truckee-Tahoe, TRUCK FOUR, Graphic DP
Truckee, CA, Truckee-Tahoe, VOR/DME RNAV OR GPS-A, Amdt 5A, CANCELED
Bonifay, FL, Tri-County, NDB-A, Amdt 2, CANCELED
New Smyrna Beach, FL, New Smyrna Beach Muni, NDB RWY 29, Amdt 2A,
CANCELED
St Petersburg-Clearwater, FL, St Pete-Clearwater Intl, VOR/DME-B,
Orig-A, CANCELED
Cornelia, GA, Habersham County, NDB RWY 6, Amdt 2, CANCELED
Creston, IA, Creston Muni, NDB RWY 34, Amdt 2A, CANCELED
Le Mars, IA, Le Mars Muni, VOR/DME RWY 36, Amdt 4A, CANCELED
Olathe, KS, Johnson County Executive, NDB-B, Amdt 3A, CANCELED
Lafayette, LA, Lafayette Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 29, Orig-B
New Roads, LA, False River Rgnl, LOC RWY 36, Amdt 1A
New Roads, LA, False River Rgnl, NDB RWY 36, Amdt 2A
New Roads, LA, False River Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Orig-A
New Roads, LA, False River Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig-A
New Roads, LA, False River Rgnl, VOR/DME-A, Amdt 4A
Opelousas, LA, St Landry Parish-Ahart Field, NDB RWY 18, Amdt 3A,
CANCELED
Oakland, MD, Garrett County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Amdt 2
Oakland, MD, Garrett County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 27, Amdt 2
Oakland, MD, Garrett County, VOR/DME RWY 9, Orig
Oakland, MD, Garrett County, VOR RWY 27, Amdt 5, CANCELED
Big Rapids, MI, Roben-Hood, GPS RWY 27, Orig-B, CANCELED
Big Rapids, MI, Roben-Hood, RNAV (GPS) RWY 27, Orig
Big Rapids, MI, Roben-Hood, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 6
Big Rapids, MI, Roben-Hood, VOR/DME-A, Amdt 8
Detroit, MI, Willow Run, RNAV (GPS) RWY 5L, Amdt 1
Detroit, MI, Willow Run, RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Amdt 2
Ray, MI, Ray Community, RNAV (GPS)-A, Orig
Ray, MI, Ray Community, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Great Falls, MT, Great Falls Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 21, Orig-B
Great Falls, MT, Great Falls Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 21, Orig-B
Great Falls, MT, Great Falls Intl, VOR RWY 21, Amdt 9C
Mount Olive, NC, Mount Olive Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, ORIG-A
Omaha, NE, Millard, NDB RWY 12, Amdt 10D, CANCELED
Sandusky, OH, Griffing-Sandusky, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 2, CANCELED
Sandusky, OH, Griffing-Sandusky, VOR RWY 27, Amdt 7B, CANCELED
Sandusky, OH, Griffing-Sandusky, VOR/DME OR GPS RWY 27, Amdt 2B,
CANCELED
Port Lavaca, TX, Calhoun County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Amdt 2
Port Lavaca, TX, Calhoun County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig
Richmond, VA, Richmond Intl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt
2
Bremerton, WA, Bremerton National, RNAV (GPS) RWY 20, Amdt 1A
Crandon, WI, Crandon/Steve Conway Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 12, Orig
Crandon, WI, Crandon/Steve Conway Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, Orig
Crandon, WI, Crandon/Steve Conway Muni, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Orig
Madison, WI, Dane County Rgnl-Truax Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Amdt
2C

[FR Doc. 2014-28243 Filed 12-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 22, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4368-4369]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00708]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2012-0784; FRL-9770-3]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
West Virginia; Requirements for Determining General Conformity of
Federal Actions to Applicable State Implementation Plans

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of West Virginia for the purpose of
amending the State's prior general conformity rule to incorporate the
most recent changes to Federal general conformity requirements
established under rules promulgated by the EPA in July of 2006 and in
April of 2010. In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA
is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct final rule without
prior proposal because EPA views this as a noncontroversial submittal
and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments
are received in response to this rulemaking action, no further activity
is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final
rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA
will

not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in
commenting on this action should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received in writing by February 21, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2012-0784 by one of the following methods:
    A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    B. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2012-0784, Donna Mastro, Acting Associate
Director, Office of Air Program Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
    D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2012-0784. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through ww.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal
are available at the West Virginia Department of Environmental
Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601 57th Street SE., Charleston,
West Virginia 25304.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Rehn,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For further information, please see the
information provided in the direct final action, with the same title,
that is located in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this
Federal Register publication.
    Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule to approve West Virginia's general
conformity SIP revision, and if that provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the
rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

    Dated: December 26, 2012.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2013-00708 Filed 1-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 245 (Friday, December 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60750-60752]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27589]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-1995-D-0288 (Formerly Docket No. 95D-0052)]

Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Changes to an Approved
Application: Certain Biological Products; Draft Guidance for Industry;
Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a draft document entitled ``Chemistry,
Manufacturing, and Controls Changes to an Approved Application: Certain
Biological Products; Draft Guidance for Industry.'' The draft guidance
is intended to assist applicants and manufacturers of certain licensed
biological products in determining which reporting category is
appropriate for a change in chemistry, manufacturing, and controls
(CMC) information to an approved biologics license application (BLA).
The draft guidance provides applicants and manufacturers general and
administrative information on reporting and evaluating changes and
recommendations for reporting categories based on a tiered-reporting
system for specific changes. The draft guidance, when finalized, is
intended to supersede the document entitled ``Guidance for Industry:
Changes to an Approved Application: Biological Products'' dated July
1997 (July 1997 guidance).

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by March 22, 2018 to ensure that the Agency considers your
comment on this draft guidance before it begins work on the final
version of the guidance.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on any guidance at any time as
follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any

confidential information that you or a third party may not wish to be
posted, such as medical information, your or anyone else's Social
Security number, or confidential business information, such as a
manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your name,
contact information, or other information that identifies you in the
body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-1995-D-0288 (formerly Docket No. 95D-0052) for ``Chemistry,
Manufacturing, and Controls Changes to an Approved Application:
Biological Products.'' Received comments will be placed in the docket
and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,''
publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets
Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on http://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
    You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
    Submit written requests for single copies of the draft guidance to
the Office of Communication, Outreach and Development, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist the office in
processing your requests. The draft guidance may also be obtained by
mail by calling CBER at 1-800-835-4709 or<PHONE_NUMBER>. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the draft
guidance document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica T. Walker, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
240-402-7911.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a draft document entitled
``Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Changes to an Approved
Application: Certain Biological Products; Draft Guidance for
Industry.'' The draft guidance, when finalized, is intended to assist
applicants and manufacturers of licensed biological products in
determining which reporting category is appropriate for a change in CMC
to an approved BLA as specified in 21 CFR 601.12. The draft guidance
provides applicants and manufacturers general and administrative
information on reporting and evaluating changes and recommendations for
reporting categories based on a tiered-reporting system for specific
changes under Sec.  601.12.
    FDA issued the July 1997 guidance (62 FR 39904; July 24, 1997) to
assist applicants in determining which reporting mechanism is
appropriate for reporting a change to an approved application to reduce
the burden on manufacturers when reporting changes and to facilitate
the approval process of the change being made. We are updating the July
1997 guidance to accommodate advances in manufacturing and testing
technology and to clarify the FDA's current thinking on assessing
reportable changes. The updated guidance applies to certain biological
products licensed under the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act),
including in vitro diagnostics licensed under BLAs. This draft guidance
applies to all manufacturing locations, including contract locations.
The following biological products are not within the scope of this
guidance: Whole blood, blood components, source plasma, and source
leukocytes. This draft guidance also does not apply to human cells,
tissues, and cellular and tissue-based products regulated solely under
section 361 of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. 264), as described in 21 CFR part
1271; specified biotechnology and specified synthetic biological
products; and biosimilar biological products subject to licensure under
section 351(k) of the PHS Act. The draft guidance, when finalized, is
intended to supersede the July 1997 guidance.
    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the current thinking of FDA on ``Chemistry,
Manufacturing, and Controls Changes to an Approved Application: Certain
Biological Products.'' It does not establish any rights for any person
and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative
approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations. This guidance is not subject to Executive Order 12866.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This draft guidance also refers to previously approved collections
of information found in FDA regulations. These collections of
information are subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520). The collections of information in 21 CFR part 210 and

21 CFR part 211 have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0139;
the collections of information in 21 CFR 601.12 have been approved
under OMB control numbers 0910-0338, and the collections of information
in 21 CFR part 820 have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0073.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the internet may obtain the draft guidance
at either https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or
https://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: December 19, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-27589 Filed 12-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 4, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 46501]
[FR Doc No: 2019-19080]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 167

[USCG-2018-1058]

Extension of Comment Period for the Port Access Route Study:
Alaskan Arctic Coast

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Coast Guard is extending the comment period
for the notice of study and request for comments for the Port Access
Route Study: Alaskan Arctic Coast that we published on December 21,
2018. This action will provide the public with additional time and
opportunity to provide the Coast Guard with information regarding the
Port Access Route Study: Alaskan Arctic Coast. The comment period is
extended until January 30, 2020.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before January 30, 2020.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-1058 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notice, please contact LCDR Michael Newell, Seventeenth Coast Guard
District (dpw), at telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER> or email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Mr. David Seris, Seventeenth Coast Guard
District (dpw), at telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER> or email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or LT Stephanie Bugyis, Seventeenth Coast Guard
District (dpw), at telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER> or email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  On December 21, 2018, the Coast Guard
published a notice of study and request for comments for the Port
Access Route Study: Alaskan Artic Coast (83 FR 65701). The comment
period in that document closed September 1, 2019. In this action, the
Coast Guard is providing notice that the public comment period is
extended until January 30, 2020. Documents mentioned in this notice,
and all public comments, are in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by searching the docket number
``USCG-2018-1058''.
    This notice is issued under authority of 33 U.S.C. 1223(c) and 5
U.S.C. 552.

    Dated: August 29, 2019.
Matthew T. Bell, Jr.,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2019-19080 Filed 9-3-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


OAQPS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ANALYTICAL TEAM REPORT

RULE / ACTION
Chemical Sector - Polyether Polyols Production; Pesticide Active Ingredient Production; Polymers and Resins IV

OBJECTIVE
This report aids rule writers in drafting required environmental justice preamble language for E.O. 12898.
SCOPE
   * Total # of unique source unit locations = 166
   * Total # of facilities = 70
   * Data Source: Updated 2005 NATA EI (Anne Pope)
EJ ASSESSMENT
Method(s)
   * Proximity-to-Source: Comparative analysis of 3 mile radius demographics to national averages.
   * Risk-based Demographic Assessment: Identification of potential cancer and non-cancer risks that may affect different social, demographic, and economic groups within the populations living near facilities (50 km) associated with inhalation exposures to hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) emitted by these facilities.
Source(s)
   * CenRANK (proximity)
   * EC/R and HEID/ATAG (cancer and non-cancer risk)

Results Summary

Proximity-to-Source

The sector-wide demographic analysis reveals that while most demographic categories are within 2 percentage points of national averages, the African American population exceeds the national average by 6 percentage points (18% versus 12%), or 50%. A facility-level review shows that the EMERALD POLYMER ADDITIVES LLC, OH facility is a main contributor with an African American population of 33,484, comprising 16% of the total Chemical Sector African American population (33,484 / 203,487). This Ohio facility exceeds the African American national average by 20 percentage points (32% versus 12%), or 166%. When multiplying the national averages by a factor of 1.25, we find there are 33 facilities with a population of 645,832 that are equal to, or exceed, this increased threshold in one or more race, ethnicity and/or poverty demographic categories. Additionally, 17 facilities exceed a threshold factor of 2 times the national averages in one or more of the aforementioned demographic categories.Below is a snapshot of the data highlighting 1) facilities exceeding 1.25 times the national averages in race, ethnicity and/or poverty, 2) emissions, 3) 3 mile population, and 4) facility clusters. (The excel file attached provides all of the supporting documentation discussed within this section.) While the Top 3 facilities for each section warrant additional attention, those of environmental justice interest are the facilities exceeding the 1.25 threshold identified below, and within the excel file. Please review the excel file in detail.   1. Facilities with populations exceeding 1.25 times the national averages in one or more of the below demographic categories: 33 facilities  -  645,832 total population
         o
               # Minority Only
               # Hispanic Only
               # Poverty Only
               # Minority & Hispanic
               # Minority & Poverty
               # Hispanic & Poverty
               # Minority, Hispanic & Poverty
   2.
         o Top 3 States:
               # TX  -  9 facilities; 181,560
               # LA  -  7 facilities; 33,391
               # SC  -  5 facilities; 44,190
         o Top 3 Facilities:
               # EMERALD POLYMER ADDITIVES LLC, OH  -  102,556
               # Dow Chemical Company, CA  -  78,718
               # GB Biosciences Corporation, TX  -  64,903

   3. Total HAP Emissions: 2,271 tons per year (TPY)
         o Top 3 HAP Categories:
               # Ethylene Glycol  -  684 TPY (30% of total)
               # Methanol  -  353 TPY (16%)
               # Acetaldehyde  -  305 TPY (13%)
         o Top 3 States:
               # SC  -  590 TPY (26%)
               # TX  -  405 TPY (18%)
               # WV  -  268 TPY (12%)
         o Top 3 Facilities :
               # Eastman Chemical Co South Carolina Operations, SC  -  172 TPY (8%)
               # Eastman Chemical Co Texas Operations, TX  -  155 TPY (7%)
               # Performance Fibers, Inc., NC  -  140 TPY (6%)

   4. Total Study Area (3 mi) Population: 1,116,923  -  70 facilities
         o Top 3 States:
               # TX  -  235,640
               # MI  -  124,620
               # OH  -  120,299
         o Top 3 Facilities:
               # EMERALD POLYMER ADDITIVES LLC, OH  -  102,556
               # BASF Corp, MI  -  92,397
               # Dow Chemical Company, CA  -  78,718

   5. Facility Clusters:

      Five facility cluster
               o             UNION CARBIDE CORP SOUTH CHARLESTON PLANT, WV +
            INSTITUTE PLANT UNION CARBIDE CORP, WV +
            BAYER CORP, WV +
            BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, WV +
            BAYER MATERIALSCIENCE - SOUTH CHARLESTON, WV =
            80,942 total population; 79.9 TPY

      Three facility cluster
               o             SHELL CHEMICAL LP/GEISMAR PLANT, LA +
            BASF CORPORATION/GEISMAR SITE, LA +
            RUBICON LLC, LA =
            1,724; 41.8 TPY[2]

      Two facility clusters
               o             LYONDELL CHEMICAL CO - CHANNELVIEW PLANT, TX + GB BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION, TX = 84,603; 89.5 TPY[2]
               o             DU PONT LA PORTE PLANT, TX + ROGER W POWELL PLANT, TX = 30,491; 72.4 TPY[2]
               o             ATOFINA PETROCHEM INC/CARVILLE POLYSTYRENE, LA + SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION INC/ST GABRIEL PLANT/CIBA-Geigy Corporation, LA = 4,722; 60.3 TPY[2]
               o             ARKEMA Inc, AL + E I Dupont De Nemours & Co, AL = 1,421 population; 46.2 TPY
               o             STEPAN CO, IL + INEOS Americas LLC, IL = 7,884; 33.2 TPY

                    Facility demographic analysis attached:


                EPA ICR No. 1031.11; OMB Control No. 2070-0017

                                 Attachment 2

Records and Reports of Allegations that Chemical Substances Cause Significant Adverse Reactions to Health or the Environment

                                  40 CFR 717

TITLE 40--PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT

CHAPTER I--ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED)

PART 717--RECORDS AND REPORTS OF ALLEGATIONS THAT CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES CAUSE SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE REACTIONS TO HEALTH OR THE ENVIRONMENT--Table of Contents

	Subpart A--General Provisions

	Sec. 717.1  Scope and compliance.

	    Section 8 (c) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requires manufacturers, processors, and distributors of chemical substances and mixtures:
	    (a) To keep "records of significant adverse reactions to health or the environment, as determined by the Administrator by rule, alleged to have been caused by the substance or mixture."
	    (b) To "permit inspection and submit copies of such records," upon request of any designated representative of the Administrator. This rule implements section 8(c) of TSCA. It describes the records to be kept and prescribes the conditions under which certain firms must submit or make the records available to a duly designated representative of the Administrator.

	Sec. 717.3  Definitions.

	    The definitions set forth in section 3 of TSCA and the following definitions apply to this part:
	    (a) Allegation means a statement, made without formal proof or regard for evidence, that a chemical substance or mixture has caused a significant adverse reaction to health or the environment.
	    (b) Firm or company means any person, that is subject to this part, as defined in Sec. 717.5.
	    (c)(1) Known human effects means a commonly recognized human health effect of a particular substance or mixture as described either in:
	    (i) Scientific articles or publications abstracted in standard reference sources.
	    (ii) The firm's product labeling or material safety data sheets (MSDS).
	    (2) However, an effect is not a "known human effect" if it:
	    (i) Was a significantly more severe toxic effect than previously described.
	    (ii) Was a manifestation of a toxic effect after a significantly shorter exposure period or lower exposure level than described.
	    (iii) Was a manifestation of a toxic effect by an exposure route different from that described.
	    (d) Manufacture or process means to manufacture or process for commercial purposes.
	    (e)(1) Manufacture for commercial purposes means to import, produce, or manufacture with the purpose of obtaining an immediate or eventual commercial advantage for the manufacturer, and includes, among other things, such "manufacture" of any amount of a chemical substance or
	mixture:
	    (i) For distribution in commerce, including for test marketing.
	    (ii) For use by the manufacturer, including use for product research and development, or as an intermediate.
	    (2) Manufacture for commercial purposes also applies to substances that are produced coincidentally during the manufacture, processing, use, or disposal of another substance or mixture, including both byproducts that are separated from that other substances or mixture and
	impurities that remain in that substance or mixture. Such byproducts and impurities may, or may not, in themselves have commercial value. They are nonetheless produced for the purpose of obtaining a commercial advantage since they are part of the manufacture of a chemical product for a commercial purpose.
	    (f) Person includes any individual, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, partnership, sole proprietorship, association, or any other business entity, any State or political subdivision thereof, and any department, agency, or instrumentally of the Federal Government.
	    (g) Process for commercial purposes means the preparation of a chemical substance or mixture, after its manufacture, for distribution in commerce with the purpose of obtaining an immediate or eventual commercial advantage for the processor. Processing of any amount of a chemical substance or mixture is included. If a chemical substance or mixture containing impurities is processed for commercial purposes, then those impurities are also processed for commercial purposes.
	    (h) Retailer means a person who distributes in commerce a chemical substance, mixture, or article to ultimate purchasers who are not commercial entities.
	    (i) Significant adverse reactions are reactions that may indicate a substantial impairment of normal activities, or long-lasting or irreversible damage to health or the environment.
	    (j) Site means a contiguous property unit. Property divided only by a public right-of-way is considered one site. There may be multiple manufacturing, processing, or distribution activities occurring within a single site.
	    (k) Substance means a chemical substance or mixture unless otherwise indicated.

	Sec. 717.5  Persons subject to this part.

	    (a) Manufacturers. (1) All manufacturers of chemical substances are subject to this part except as provided in Sec. 717.7(a). If manufacture of a chemical substance occurs at any site owned or controlled by a firm then that firm is subject to this part.
	    (2) A manufacturer must collect:
	    (i) Any allegation identifying a chemical substance it manufactures and any allegation identifying the operations in the manufacture of any chemical substance it manufactures.
	    (ii) Any allegation identifying any of its own processing or distribution in commerce activities with respect to any chemical substance it manufactures.
	    (iii) Any allegation identifying emissions, effluents, or other discharges from activities described in this paragraph.
	    (iv) Any allegation identifying a substance produced coincidentally during processing, use, storage or disposal of a chemical substance it manufactures.
	    (3) For the purpose of this part, owned or controlled means ownership of 50 percent or more of a firm's voting stock or other equity rights, or the power to control the management and policies of that firm.
	    (b) Processors. (1) A person who processes chemical substances, who is not also a manufacturer of those chemical substances, is subject to this part if (i) the person processes chemical substances to produce mixtures, or (ii) the person repackages chemical substances or mixtures.
	    (2) As a processor subject to this part such person must collect:
	    (i) Any allegation identifying any mixture it produces and distributes in commerce and any allegation identifying any chemical substance or mixture it repackages and distributes in commerce.
	    (ii) Any allegation identifying any of its own further processing or distribution in commerce activities of the products described in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section.
	    (iii) Any allegation identifying emissions, effluents, or other discharges from activities described in this paragraph.
	    (iv) Any allegation identifying a substance produced coincidentally during the processing, use, storage or disposal of the products described in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section.
	    (c) SIC code. SIC codes applicable to this part are published in Standard Industrial Classification Manual--1972 and the 1977 Supplement. This manual and supplement may be obtained from the U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402--stock number 4101-0006 and stock number<PHONE_NUMBER>-0 respectively. Where there is a conflict between the SIC code use of a term and the definition of that term in this part, the definition in this part applies.

	[48 FR 38187, Aug 22, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 46769, Nov. 13, 1985]

	Sec. 717.7  Persons not subject to this part.

	    (a) Manufacturers. (1) Persons or site activities are exempt from this part if the means by which they manufacture a chemical substance solely involves mining or other solely extractive functions, e.g., those companies or sites within a company whose sole function is to mine mineral ores, extract petroleum or natural gas, quarry non-metallic minerals (including extraction of salts from seawater or brines), mine or otherwise extract coal, or separate gases from the atmosphere. This exemption may include, but is not necessarily limited to, firms engaged in activities as described in SIC Division B--Mining and SIC Code 2813--Industrial Gases.
	    (2) A person is not subject to this part if the chemical substances that person causes to be produced are limited to:
	    (i) Chemical substances that result from chemical reactions that occur incidental to exposure of another chemical substance, mixture, or article to environmental factors such as air, moisture, microbial organisms, or sunlight.
	    (ii) Chemical substances that result from chemical reactions that occur incidental to storage or disposal of other chemical substances, mixtures, or articles.
	    (iii) Chemical substances that result from chemical reactions that occur upon end use of other chemical substances, mixtures, or articles such as adhesives, paints, miscellaneous cleaners or other housekeeping products, fuel additives, water softening and treatment agents, photographic films, batteries, matches, or safety flares, and that are not themselves manufactured or imported for distribution in commerce for use as chemical intermediates.
	    (iv) Chemical substances that result from chemical reactions that occur upon use of curable plastic or rubber molding compounds, inks, drying oils, metal finishing compounds, adhesives, or paints, or other chemical substance formed during the manufacture of an article destined for the marketplace without further chemical change of the chemical substance.
	    (v) Chemical substances that result from chemical reactions that occur when (A) a stabilizer, colorant, odorant, antioxidant, filler, solvent, carrier, surfactant, plasticizer, corrosion inhibitor,
	antifoamer or defoamer, dispersant, precipitation-inhibitor, binder, emulsifier, deemulsifier, dewatering agent, agglomerating agent, adhesion promoter, flow modifier, pH adjuster, sequestrant, coagulant, flocculant, fire retardant, lubricant, chelating agent, or quality control reagent functions as intended, or (B) a chemical substance, which is intended solely to impart a specific physicochemical characteristic, functions as intended.
	    (b) [Reserved]
	    (c) Sole distributors. A person solely engaged in the distribution of chemical substances is exempt from this part, unless such person is also a manufacturer or processor subject to this part. For example, a "distributor" who repackages chemical substances or mixtures is considered to be a processor and, thus, is not a sole distributor. Sole distributors may include, but are not limited to, those firms that distribute chemical substances as described in the wholesale trade SIC codes 5161--Chemicals and Allied Products, 5171--Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals, and 5172--Petroleum and Petroleum Products Wholesalers, Except Bulk Stations and Terminals.
	    (d) Retailers. A person who is a retailer is exempt from this part unless such person is also a manufacturer or a processor subject to this part.

	[48 FR 38187, Aug 22, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 46770, Nov. 13, 1985]

	Sec. 717.10  Allegations subject to this part.

	    (a) Allegations subject to this part are those allegations received on or after November 21, 1983 by persons subject to this part.
	    (b) Allegations subject to this part are those that:
	    (1) Are submitted either in writing and are signed by the alleger, or are submitted orally. In the case of an oral allegation, the firm must transcribe the allegation into written form, or it must inform the alleger that such allegation may be subject to this part and request that the alleger submit such allegation to the firm in writing and signed.
	    (2) Implicate a substance that caused the stated significant adverse reaction by one of the following:
	    (i) Naming the specific substance.
	    (ii) Naming a mixture that contains a specific substance.
	    (iii) Naming an article that contains a specific substance.
	    (iv) Naming a company process or operation in which substances are involved.
	    (v) Identifying an effluent, emission, or other discharge from a site of manufacturing, processing or distribution of a substance.
	    (c) Allegations subject to this part may be made to a firm by any person, such as an employee of the firm, individual consumer, a neighbor of the firm's plant, another firm on behalf of its employees or an organization on behalf of its members.
	    (d) EPA intends that firms should, to the maximum practical extent, provide allegers with information regarding the ultimate disposition of their allegations. For example, firms could provide a brief notice to the alleger stating that a record was created under this part based upon
	their allegation, or that a record was not created and briefly explain the reasons why not.

	Sec. 717.12  Significant adverse reactions that must be recorded.

	    (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, significant adverse reactions to human health that must be recorded include but are not limited to:
	    (1) Long-lasting or irreversible damage, such as cancer or birth defects.
	    (2) Partial or complete impairment of bodily functions, such as reproductive disorders, neurological disorders or blood disorders.
	    (3) An impairment of normal activities experienced by all or most of the persons exposed at one time.
	    (4) An impairment of normal activities which is experienced each time an individual is exposed.
	    (b) Firms are not required to record significant adverse reactions that are known human effects as defined in Sec. 717.3(c).
	    (c) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, significant adverse reactions to the environment that must be recorded, even if restricted to the environs of a plant or disposal site, include but are not limited to:
	    (1) Gradual or sudden changes in the composition of animal life or plant life, including fungal or microbial organisms, in an area.
	    (2) Abnormal number of deaths of organisms (e.g., fish kills).
	    (3) Reduction of the reproductive success or the vigor of a species.
	    (4) Reduction in agricultural productivity, whether crops or livestock.
	    (5) Alterations in the behavior or distribution of a species.
	    (6) Long lasting or irreversible contamination of components of the physical environment, especially in the case of ground water, and surface water and soil resources that have limited self-cleansing capability.
	    (d) Firms are not required to record a significant adverse reaction to the environment if the alleged cause of that significant adverse reaction can be directly attributable to an accidental spill or other accidental discharge, emission exceeding permitted limits, or other incident of environmental contamination that has been reported to the Federal Government under any applicable authority.

	[48 FR 38187, Aug. 22, 1983, as amended at 49 FR 23183, June 5, 1984; 58 FR 34204, June 23, 1993]

	Sec. 717.15  Recordkeeping requirements.

	    (a) Establishment and location of records. A firm subject to this part shall establish and maintain records of significant adverse reactions alleged to have been caused by chemical substances or mixtures manufactured or processed by the firm. Such records shall be kept at the firm's headquarters or at any other appropriate location central to the firm's chemical operations.
	    (b) Content of records. The record shall consist of the following:
	    (1) The original allegation as received.
	    (2) An abstract of the allegation and other pertinent information as follows:
	    (i) The name and address of the plant site which received the allegation.
	    (ii) The date the allegation was received at that site.
	    (iii) The implicated substance, mixture, article, company process or operation, or site discharge.
	    (iv) A description of the alleger (e.g., "company employee," "individual consumer," "plant neighbor"). If the allegation involves a health effect, the sex and year of birth of the individual should be recorded, if ascertainable.
	    (v) A description of the alleged health effect(s). The description must relate how the effect(s) became known and the route of exposure, if explained in the allegation.
	    (vi) A description of the nature of the alleged environmental effect(s), identifying the affected plant and/or animal species, or contaminated portion of the physical environment.
	    (3) The results of any self-initiated investigation with respect to an allegation. (EPA does not require persons subject to this part to investigate allegations received, and no provision of this part shall be construed to imply that EPA recommends, encourages or requires such
	investigation.)
	    (4) Copies of any further required records or reports relating to the allegation. For example, if an employee allegation results in a requirement for the firm to record the case on Occupational Safety and Health Form 101 or appropriate substitute (see 29 CFR part 1904 for requirements under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970), a copy of that OSHA record must be included in the allegation record.
	    (c) File structure. Records must be retrievable by the alleged cause of the significant adverse reaction, which cause may be one of the following:
	    (1) A specific chemical identity.
	    (2) A mixture.
	    (3) An article.
	    (4) A company process or operation.
	    (5) A site emission, effluent or other discharge.
	    (d) Retention period. Records of significant adverse reactions to the health of employees shall be retained for a period of 30 years from the date such reactions were first reported to or known by the person maintaining such records. This provision requires persons subject to this part to retain for 30 years an employee health related allegation, arising from any employment related exposure, whether or not such allegation was submitted by or on the behalf of that recordkeeper's own employee. Any other record of significant adverse reactions shall be maintained for a period of five years from the date the information contained in the record was first reported to or known by the person maintaining the record.
	    (e) Transfer of records. (1) If a firm ceases to do business, the successor must receive and keep all the records that must be kept under this part.
	    (2) If a firm ceases to do business and there is no successor to receive and keep the records for the prescribed period, these records must be transmitted to EPA. See Sec. 717.17(c) for the address to which such records must be sent.

	[48 FR 38187, Aug. 22, 1983, as amended at 49 FR 23183, June 5, 1984; 58 FR 34204, June 23, 1993]
	Sec. 717.17  Inspection and reporting requirements.

	    (a) Inspection. Firms must make records of allegations available for inspection by any duly designated representative of the Administrator.
	    (b) Reporting. Each person who is required to keep records under this part must submit copies of those records to the Agency as required by the EPA Administrator or appropriate designee. EPA will notify those responsible for reporting by letter or will announce any such requirements for submitting copies of records by a notice in the Federal Register. Such letter or notice will be signed by the Administrator or appropriate designee, and will specify which records or portion of records must be submitted. The reporting period will be specified by the letter or notice but in no case will such reporting period be less than 45 days from the date of the letter or the effective date of the notice.
	    (c) How to report. When required to report, firms must submit copies of records (preferably by certified mail) to the Document Control Office (7407), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Room G-099, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC., 20460, ATTN: 8(c) Allegations.

	[48 FR 38187, Aug. 22, 1983, as amended at 49 FR 23183, June 5, 1984; 52 FR 20084, May 29, 1987; 53 FR 12523, Apr. 15, 1988; 58 FR 34204, June 23, 1993; 60 FR 34464, July 3, 1995]

	Sec. 717.19  Confidentiality.

	    (a) Any person submitting copies of records may assert a business confidentiality claim covering all or part of the submitted information. Any information covered by a claim will be disclosed by EPA only as provided in procedures set forth at part 2 of this title.
	    (b) If no claim accompanies a document at the time it is submitted to EPA, the document will be placed in an open file available to the public without further notice to the respondent.
	    (c) To asset a claim of confidentiality for information contained in a submitted record, the respondent must submit two copies of the document.
	    (1) One copy must be complete. In that copy, the respondent must indicate what information, if any, is claimed as confidential by marking the specific information on each page with a label such as "confidential," "proprietary," or "trade secret" and briefly state the basis of the claim.
	    (2) If some information is claimed as confidential, the respondent must submit a second copy of the record. The second copy must be complete, except that all information claimed as confidential in the first copy must be deleted.
	    (3) The first copy will be for internal use by EPA. The second copy will be placed in an open file to be available to the public.
	    (4) Failure to furnish a second copy when information is claimed as confidential in the first copy will be considered a presumptive waiver of the claim of confidentiality. EPA will notify the respondent by certified mail that a finding of a presumptive waiver of the claim of confidentiality has been made. The respondent will be given 30 days from the date of receipt of notification to submit the required second copy. If the respondent fails to submit the second copy within the 30 days, EPA will place the first copy in the public file.


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 111 (Thursday, June 9, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33651-33653]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14204]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R10-OAR-2007-0406, FRL-9316-7]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; ID

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to the Idaho State Implementation
Plan (SIP) that were submitted to EPA by the State of Idaho on April
16, 2007. This SIP submittal includes new and revised rules which
provide the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ) the
regulatory authority to address regional haze and to implement Best
Available Retrofit Technology (BART) requirements.

DATES: This action is effective on July 11, 2011.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R10-OAR-2007-0406. All documents in the docket
are listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed
in the index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region 10, Office of Air,
Waste, and Toxics, AWT-107, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington
98101. EPA requests that you contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The
Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Body at telephone number: (206)
553-0782, e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or the above EPA, Region
10 address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.
    Information is organized as follows:

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. Public Comments on the Proposed Action
III. Final Action
IV. Limitations in Indian Country
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    On January 5, 2011, EPA published in the Federal Register, a
proposal to approve new and revised Idaho administrative rules:
IDAPA<IP_ADDRESS>.04.a,b,c; 006.14.a through z; 006.16; 006.28; 006.42;
006.63.d; 006.65; 006.67; 006.81; 006.91; 006.92.b; 006.99; 006.101.b;
006.124; 006.125; 007.02a.iv; 007.02.d; 651; 665; 666; 667; and 668.
These rules provide the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality
(IDEQ) the regulatory authority to address regional haze and to
implement Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) requirements. See
76 FR 508. Included in Idaho's SIP revision submittal were several
other visibility-related rule revisions which are not specifically
related to regional haze or BART requirements. One revision related to
open burning is not being addressed in this action because it was
superseded by a subsequent SIP revision on May 28, 2008, which was
approved in a separate rulemaking on August 1, 2008. Other revisions
related to permitting are not being addressed in this action because
they were superseded by subsequent SIP revisions on May 12, 2008, and
June 8, 2009, which were approved in a separate rulemaking on November
26, 2010.
    The rule revisions were submitted in accordance with the
requirements of section 110 and part D of the Clean Air Act.

II. Public Comments on the Proposed Action

    EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period and solicited
comments on our proposal published in the January 5, 2011, Federal
Register (76 FR 508). EPA received no comments on this proposed action.

III. Final Action

    Pursuant to section 110 of the CAA, EPA is approving as a SIP
revision Idaho rules: IDAPA<IP_ADDRESS>.04.a,b,c; 006.14.a through z;
006.16; 006.28; 006.42; 006.63.d; 006.65; 006.67; 006.81; 006.91;
006.92.b; 006.99; 006.101.b; 006.124; 006.125; 007.02a.iv; 007.02.d;
651; 665; 666; 667; and 668, that provide the State of Idaho authority
to impose the BART provisions of 40 CFR 51.308(e). These revisions are
described in detail in EPA's proposed action, published in the Federal
Register on January 5, 2011, (76 FR 508).

IV. Limitations in Indian Country

    Idaho has not demonstrated authority to implement and enforce IDAPA
chapter 58 within ``Indian Country'' as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151.\1\
Therefore, this SIP approval does not extend to ``Indian Country'' in
Idaho. See CAA sections 110(a)(2)(A) (SIP shall include enforceable
emission limits), 110(a)(2)(E)(i) (State must have adequate authority
under State law to carry out SIP), and 172(c)(6) (nonattainment SIPs
shall include enforceable emission limits). This is consistent with
EPA's previous approval of Idaho's SIP revisions, in which EPA
specifically disapproved the program for sources within Indian
Reservations in Idaho because the State had not shown it had authority
to regulate such sources. See 40 CFR 52.683(b). It is also consistent
with EPA's approval of Idaho's title V air operating permits program.
See 61 FR 64622, 64623 (December 6, 1996) (interim approval does not
extend to Indian Country); 66 FR 50574, 50575 (October 4, 2001) (full
approval does not extend to Indian Country).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ ``Indian country'' is defined under 18 U.S.C. 1151 as: (1)
All land within the limits of any Indian reservation under the
jurisdiction of the United States Government, notwithstanding the
issuance of any patent, and including rights-of-way running through
the reservation, (2) all dependent Indian communities within the
borders of the United States, whether within the original or
subsequently acquired territory thereof, and whether within or
without the limits of a State, and (3) all Indian allotments, the
Indian titles to which have not been extinguished, including rights-
of-way through the same. Under this definition, EPA treats as
reservations trust lands validly set aside for the use of a Tribe
even if the trust lands have not been formally designated as a
reservation. In Idaho, Indian country includes, but is not limited
to, the Coeur d'Alene Reservation, the Reservation of the Kootenai
Tribe, the Fort hall Indian Reservation, and the Nez Perce
Reservation as described in the 1863 Nez Perce Treaty.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and the EPA notes

that it will not impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments
or preempt Tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by August 8, 2011. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, and Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    Dated: May, 25, 2011.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart N--Idaho

0
2. In Sec.  52.670(c), the table in paragraph (c) is amended:
0
a. By revising entries 006 and 007.
0
b. By revising entry 651.
0
c. By adding entries 665 through 668.

Sec.  52.670  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                         EPA-Approved Idaho Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        State citation          Title/subject   State effective date    EPA approval date       Explanations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Idaho Administrative Procedures Act (IDAPA) 58.01.01--Rules for the Control of Air Pollution in Idaho
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
006..........................  General          3/30/07 4/11/06, 7/1/ 6/9/11 [Insert page   Except Section
                                Definitions.     02, 4/5/00, 3/20/     number where the      006.55(b) (re:
                                                 97, 5/1/94.           document begins].     state air toxics in
                                                                                definition of
                                                                                ``modification'').
007..........................  Definitions for  3/30/07, 4/11/06, 4/  6/9/11 [Insert page
                                the Purposes     5/00, 6/30/95, 5/1/   number where the
                                of Sections      95, 5/1/94.           document begins].
                                200 through
                                225 and 400
                                through 461.

                                                  * * * * * * *
651..........................  General Rules..  3/30/07, 5/1/94.....  6/9/11 [Insert page
                                                                       number where the
                                                                       document begins].
665..........................  Regional Haze    3/30/07.............  6/9/11 [Insert page
                                Rules.                                 number where the
                                                                       document begins].
666..........................  Reasonable       3/30/07.............  6/9/11 [Insert page
                                Progress Goals.                        number where the
                                                                       document begins].
667..........................  Long-Term        3/30/07.............  6/9/11 [Insert page
                                Strategy for                           number where the
                                Regional Haze.                         document begins].
668..........................  BART             3/30/07.............  6/9/11 [Insert page
                                Requirement                            number where the
                                for Regional                           document begins].
                                Haze.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2011-14204 Filed 6-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P