[Federal Register: January 15, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 10)]
[Notices]
[Page 2477-2478]
[DOCID:fr15ja08-48]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

January 10, 2008.
    The following notice of meeting is published pursuant to section
3(a) of the government in the Sunshine Act (Pub. L. No. 94-409), 5
U.S.C. 552b:
    Agency Holding Meeting: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
    Date and Time: January 17, 2008, 10 a.m.
    Place: Room 2C, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    Status: Open.
    Matters To Be Considered: Agenda.
    *Note.--Items listed on the agenda may be deleted without further
notice.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Telehone<PHONE_NUMBER>. For a recorded message listing items struck
from or added to the meeting, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    This is a list of matters to be considered by the Commission. It
does not include a listing of all documents relevant to the items on
the agenda. All public documents, however, may be viewed on line at the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link,

or may be examined in the Commission's Public Reference Room.

                                                  928th--Meeting
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Item No.                     Docket No.                                   Company
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Administrative
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-1.....................  AD02-1-000......................  Agency Administrative Matters.
A-2.....................  AD02-7-000......................  Customer Matters, Reliability, Security and Market
                                                             Operations.
A-3.....................  AD06-3-000......................  Energy Market Update.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Electric
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E-1.....................  OMITTED.........................
E-2.....................  RM06-22-000.....................  Mandatory Reliability Standards for Critical
                                                             Infrastructure Protection.
E-3.....................  ER08-194-000....................  Duquesne Light Company.
E-4.....................  ER01-2569-005...................  Boralex Livermore Falls LP.
                          ER98-4652-005...................  Boralex Stratton Energy LP.
                          ER02-1175-004...................  Boralex Ft. Fairfield LP.
                          ER01-2568-004...................  Boralex Ashland LP.
E-5.....................  EL07-41-001, ER07-583-003.......  Commonwealth Edison Company and Commonwealth Edison
                                                             Company of Indiana, Inc.
E-6.....................  OMITTED.........................
E-7.....................  QM8-2-000.......................  PECO Energy Company.
E-8.....................  ER04-157-021....................  Bangor Hydro-Electric Company.
                          ER04-714-011....................  Florida Power and Light Company.
                          EL05-89-001.....................  Maine Public Utilities Commission v. Central Maine
                                                             Power Company.
E-9.....................  OMITTED.........................
E-10....................  ER07-576-003....................  Baltimore Gas and Electric Company.
E-11....................  ER00-2268-019, ER00-2268-023,     Pinnacle West Capital Corporation.
                           EL05-10-000.
                          ER99-4124-016, ER99-4124-020,     Arizona Public Service Company.
                           EL05-11-000.
                          EL05-12-000.....................  Pinnacle West Energy Corporation.
                          ER99-4122-018, ER99-4122-024,     APS Energy Services Company, Inc.
                           EL05-13-000.
                          ER07-428-001, ER07-428-002, EL07- Pinnacle West Marketing and Trading Co., LLC.
                           82-000.
E-12....................  EL08-10-000.....................  Wisconsin Electric Power Company.
E-13....................  OMITTED.........................
E-14....................  EL07-70-001.....................  Hudson Transmission Partners, LLC vs. New York
                                                             Independent System Operator, Inc.
E-15....................  EL07-42-001.....................  Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  MISCELLANEOUS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
M-1.....................  RM08-5-000......................  Revisions to Forms, Statements and Reporting
                                                             Requirements for Electric Utilities and Licensees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      HYDRO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
H-1.....................  P-2524-012......................  Grand River Dam Authority.
H-2.....................  P-2149-137......................  Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County,
                                                             Washington.
H-3.....................  P-12911-003.....................  The Electric Plant Board of the City of Paducah,
                                                             Kentucky.
H-4.....................  P-7267-045......................  Joseph M. Keating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  CERTIFICATES
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C-1.....................  RM06-7-003......................  Revisions to the Blanket Certificate Regulations and
                                                             Clarification Regarding Rates.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
    A free webcast of this event is available through http://www.ferc.gov.

Anyone with Internet access who desires to view this event can do so by
navigating to http://www.ferc.gov's Calendar of Events and locating this event

in the Calendar. The event will contain a link to its webcast. The
Capitol Connection provides technical support for the free webcasts. It
also offers access to this event via television in the DC area and via
phone bridge for a fee. If you have any questions, visit
http://www.CapitolConnection.org or contact Danelle Springer or David

Reininger at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Immediately following the conclusion of the Commission Meeting, a
press briefing will be held in the Commission Meeting Room. Members of
the public may view this briefing in the designated overflow room. This
statement is intended to notify the public that the press briefings
that follow Commission meetings may now be viewed remotely at
Commission headquarters, but will not be telecast through the Capitol
Connection service.

 [FR Doc. E8-625 Filed 1-14-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: April 11, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 71)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 19768-19770]
[DOCID:fr11ap08-10]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0409; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-265-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; ATR Model ATR42 Airplanes and Model
ATR72-101, -102, -201, -202, -211, and -212 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    It has been found on in-service aircraft that some aileron tab
bellcrank assemblies were not in accordance with the definition
drawings.
    The main item concerned is the retainer Part Number
S2711004620000, which has been manufactured with a hole larger than
it should be, or redrilled out of limits.
    The function of the retainer is to maintain the spacer in
position in case of rupture or loss of the bolt which links the tab
control rod to the bellcrank assembly. If the diameter of the
retainer hole is out of limit, the retainer function is lost and
fail-safe installation is no longer ensured. This condition, if not
corrected, could lead to loss of the aileron tab bellcrank
functionality, resulting in diminished control of the aircraft.
* * * * * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 12, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0409;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-265-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2006-0376, dated December 19, 2006 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    It has been found on in-service aircraft that some aileron tab
bellcrank assemblies were not in accordance with the definition
drawings.
    The main item concerned is the retainer Part Number
S2711004620000, which has been manufactured with a hole larger than
it should be, or redrilled out of limits.
    The function of the retainer is to maintain the spacer in
position in case of rupture or loss of the bolt which links the tab
control rod to the bellcrank assembly. If the diameter of the
retainer hole is out of limit, the retainer function is lost and
fail-safe installation is no longer ensured. This condition, if not
corrected, could lead to loss of the aileron tab bellcrank
functionality, resulting in diminished control of the aircraft.
    For the reasons stated above, this Airworthiness Directive (AD)
requires the inspection [for proper hole diameter] of the aileron
tab bellcrank retainer and, if necessary, the restoration of a
proper installation [replacing any retainer which does not meet
specified limits with a new retainer].

Corrective actions also include doing a general visual inspection (GVI)
for discrepancies (corrosion, deformation, scratches, or other defects)
of the bolt and fasteners of the bellcrank assembly. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    ATR has issued Avions de Transport Regional Service Bulletins
ATR42-27-0098 and ATR72-27-1060, both dated December 19, 2006. The
actions described in this service information are intended to correct
the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another

country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 51 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 2 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $8,160, or $160 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

ATR-GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional (Formerly Aerospatiale):
Docket No. FAA-2008-0409; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-265-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by May 12, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to ATR Model ATR42 airplanes, certificated
in any category, all models, all serial numbers, except airplanes
which have received ATR modification 04372 (aileron spring tab) in
production or ATR Service Bulletin (SB) ATR42-27-0081 or Service
Bulletin ATR42-27-0092 in service; and ATR Model ATR72-101, -102, -
201, -202, -211, and -212 airplanes, certificated in any category,
all serial numbers, except airplanes which have received ATR
modification 04373 (aileron spring tab) in production or ATR Service
Bulletin ATR72-27-1045 in service.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight
Controls.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    It has been found on in-service aircraft that some aileron tab
bellcrank assemblies were not in accordance with the definition
drawings.
    The main item concerned is the retainer Part Number
S2711004620000, which has been manufactured with a hole larger than
it should be, or redrilled out of limits.
    The function of the retainer is to maintain the spacer in
position in case of rupture or loss of the bolt which links the tab
control rod to the bellcrank assembly. If the diameter of the
retainer hole is out of limit, the retainer function is lost and
fail-safe installation is no longer ensured. This condition, if not
corrected, could lead to loss of the aileron tab bellcrank
functionality, resulting in diminished control of the aircraft.
    For the reasons stated above, this Airworthiness Directive (AD)
requires the inspection [for proper hole diameter] of the aileron
tab bellcrank retainer and, if necessary, the restoration of a
proper installation [replacing any retainer which does not meet
specified limits with a new retainer].

Corrective actions also include doing a general visual inspection
(GVI) for discrepancies (corrosion, deformation, scratches, or other
defects) of the bolt and fasteners of the bellcrank assembly.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, unless
already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Measure the hole diameter of the retainer of the aileron
automatic tab bellcrank assembly, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Avions de Transport Regional Service
Bulletin ATR42-27-0098 or ATR72-27-1060, both dated December 19,
2006, as applicable. If the hole diameter is within specified
limits, no further actions are required by paragraph (f) of this AD
for that retainer.
    (2) If any retainer exceeds the hole diameter limits specified
in Avions de Transport Regional Service Bulletin ATR42-27-0098 or
ATR72-27-1060, both dated December 19, 2006, as applicable, before
further flight, replace the retainer with a retainer that meets hole
diameter limits, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of the applicable service bulletin. For any airplane for which a
replacement retainer is not available, before further flight, do a
GVI for discrepancies of the bolt and fasteners of the bellcrank
assembly. If any discrepancies of the bolt and

fasteners are found, replace the retainer before further flight, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable
service bulletin. If no discrepancies are found, replace the
retainer no later than 2 flight days after the hole measurement, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable
service bulletin.

    Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a GVI is: ``A visual
examination of an interior or exterior area, installation, or
assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, or irregularity. This
level of inspection is made from within touching distance unless
otherwise specified. A mirror may be necessary to ensure visual
access to all surfaces in the inspection area. This level of
inspection is made under normally available lighting conditions such
as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or droplight and may
require removal or opening of access panels or doors. Stands,
ladders, or platforms may be required to gain proximity to the area
being checked.''

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-1137; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Airworthiness Directive 2006-0376, dated December 19, 2006, and
Avions de Transport Regional Service Bulletins ATR42-27-0098 and
ATR72-27-1060, both dated December 19, 2006, for related
information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 3, 2008.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
 [FR Doc. E8-7658 Filed 4-10-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: November 1, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 211)]
[Notices]
[Page 64259-64260]
[DOCID:fr01no06-58]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RP88-67-082; RP98-198-009]

Texas Eastern Transmission, LP; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 25, 2006.
    Take notice that on October 16, 2006, Texas Eastern Transmission,
LP (Texas Eastern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff,
Seventh Revised Volume No. 1 and First Revised Volume No. 2, the tariff
sheets listed on

Appendix A to the filing to become effective December 1, 2006.
    Texas Eastern asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply
with the Stipulation and Agreement filed by Texas Eastern on December
17, 1991 in Docket Nos. RP88-67, et al. (Phase II/PCBs) and approved by
the Commission on March 18, 1992 (Settlement), and with Section 26 of
the General Terms and Conditions of Texas Eastern's FERC Gas Tariff,
Seventh Revised Volume No. 1.
    Texas Eastern states that such tariff sheets reflect a small
increase in the PCB-Related Cost component of certain of Texas
Eastern's currently effective rates. For the other rates the cost
increase is so small that the calculated rate is not changed from the
currently effective rate and no revised tariff sheet is filed.
    Texas Eastern states that copies of the filing were mailed to all
affected customers of Texas Eastern and interested state commissions.
Copies of this filing have also been mailed to all parties on the
service list in Docket Nos. RP88-67, et al.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Sec.  154.210 of the
Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest must
serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons

unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-18343 Filed 10-31-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


From:
Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent:
Thursday, May 13, 2021 5:51 PM
To:
Paul Balserak<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:
RE: EAF NSPS

Hi Paul  -  Although I always enjoy talking directly to the facility representatives, the SMA asked me the same thing and I told them no because I have provided all I can already to you and SMA so I didn't want to disappoint anyone who might be thinking that something new might be discussed beyond my summary. I think you were on the call with SMA and their attorneys when we last talked.

Here is what I can say about the rule:

Summary of NSPS work for the EAF NSPS technology review.

Required by CAA section 111(b)(1)(B) which  requires the EPA to review and revise, if appropriate, the NSPS every eight years.

AA/AAa: Looking at changes to current rule to reflect suggestions for improvements/clarifications made by facilities and also (so far) Region V enforcement, the EPA test method specialist for the project, the project attorney, OECA member for the project, and myself.

Potential new rule: Looking at PM and opacity test data acquired in 2010/2011 as part of the ICR for Hg (reports from 31 facilities dating over 2005-2011) to see if a new rule would be warranted. The new rule would affect facilities built after 11/1/21, the consent decree date for the EAF NSPS proposal. The test reports are in the EAF docket and a list of the facilities and dates of the reports has been provided in the docket, as well. I've attached the list here. The reports are in Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0049, in Federal eRulemaking Portal https://www.regulations.gov.

Whereas we develop MACT floors for NESHAP limits, for NSPS we follow CAA section 111(a)(1), which says that performance standards are to "reflect the degree of emission limitation achievable through the application of the best system of emission reduction which (taking into account the cost of achieving such reduction and any nonair quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements) the Administrator determines has been adequately demonstrated." We refer to this level of control as the best system of emission reduction (BSER).

That's pretty much all I can say. If you like, you can send me their questions if you accumulate them for me, and I will answer them if I can and send back in time for your meeting. I will also thank them for their comments.

Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

Pronouns - She/Her/Hers
Salutation - Dr./Ms.

<< List of EAF facilities with data-NSPS.pdf >>

From: Paul Balserak<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2021 4:37 PM
To: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: EAF NSPS

Dear Dr. Jones,

I wanted to ask if you would speak to my Environment Committee, virtually, regarding the EAF NSPS rule.  This would be a 30 min time slot on Wednesday, June 2.  You could have any (1/2) hour slot between 1:00pm and 3:30pm.  You could just give a high level overview of the rulemaking for approximately 20 mins and then allow a brief time for questions.  My Environment Committee is made up of approximately 25 or 30 environmental managers at both EAF and integrated plants.  These are the people who helped to craft the draft edits to the reg text provided to you in November and January.  There would not be any detailed questions about where the agency will come out exactly on a particular issue, so this is in no way setting you up for a hard discussion.  They would simply appreciate an opportunity to hear from you on the rule.

I am happy to answer any questions.  Please let me know if you are willing and able to speak.

Thank you,
Paul

Paul Balserak
Vice President, Environment

American Iron and Steel Institute
25 Massachusetts Ave.  NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC  20001
202 452-7122 (office)
703 969-1789 (mobile)


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 210 (Wednesday, October 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58187-58188]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23657]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-87402; File No. SR-NYSENAT-2019-19]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE National, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend the Exchange's Price List Related to Co-Location
Services To Offer Access to a Network Providing Connection to the Three
Equities and Options Feeds

October 24, 2019.
    On August 22, 2019, NYSE National, Inc. (``NYSE National'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to establish a network providing connection to
three equities and options feeds \3\ and amend the Exchange's price
list relating to co-location services to offer access to the network.
The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal
Register on September 10, 2019.\4\ One comment on the proposed rule
change has been received.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ The Securities Industry Automation Corporation disseminates
information concerning: (1) Last-sale price information in Tape A
and Tape B-listed securities pursuant to the CTA Plan, (2) quotation
information in Tape A and B-listed securities pursuant to the CQ
Plan, and (3) quotation and last-sale price information in exchange
options trading pursuant to the OPRA Plan. See Notice, infra note 4,
at footnote 8.
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86869 (September 4,
2019), 84 FR 47600.
    \5\ See Letter from John M. Yetter, Vice President and Senior
Deputy General Counsel, Nasdaq, to Vanessa Countryman, Secretary,
Commission, dated October 24, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \6\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period

to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding, or as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission shall
either approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule
change, or institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved. The 45th day after publication of the
notice for this proposed rule change is October 25, 2019. The
Commission is extending this 45-day time period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that it has
sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change and the comments
received. Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of
the Act,\7\ designates December 9, 2019, as the date by which the
Commission shall either approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings
to determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No.
SR-NYSENAT-2019-19).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-23657 Filed 10-29-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 160 (Monday, August 21, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39520-39523]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17203]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2017-0520; Product Identifier 2016-NM-143-AD; Amendment
39-18995; AD 2017-17-05]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A300 series airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and
F4-600R series airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes
(collectively called Model A300-600 series airplanes). This AD was
prompted by reports of cracks initiating at the upper radius of a
certain frame and a determination that the current inspection procedure
is not reliable in detecting certain cracking of the forward fitting of
the frame. This AD requires repetitive inspections to detect cracking
of the upper radius of the forward fitting of a certain frame, and
related investigative actions and corrective actions if necessary. We
are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective September 25, 2017.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of September 25,
2017.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax: +33 5 61 93 44 51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet: http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the Internet at
http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2017-0520.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0520; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone
800-647-5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 425-
227-1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Airbus Model A300
series airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R series
airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes (collectively
called Model A300-600 series airplanes). The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on May 31, 2017 (82 FR 24903) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM
was prompted by reports of cracks initiating at the upper radius of
frame (FR) 47 and a determination that the current inspection procedure
is not reliable in detecting certain cracking of the forward fitting of
FR 47. The NPRM proposed to require repetitive inspections to detect
cracking of the upper radius of the forward fitting of FR 47, and
related investigative actions and corrective actions if necessary. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the FR 47
forward fitting upper radius on the left-hand and right-hand sides of
the fuselage, which could propagate and result in reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD
2016-0150, dated July 25, 2016 (referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an
unsafe condition on all. The MCAI states:

    During scheduled maintenance inspections on the fuselage, cracks
initiating at the upper radius of frame (FR) 47 have been reported
on several aeroplanes. Similar damage was also discovered on the
A300 fatigue test fuselage.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could reduce the
structural integrity of the fuselage.
    Prompted by these findings, Airbus issued Service Bulletin (SB)
A300-53-0246, SB A300-53-6029 and SB A300-53-9014 to provide
inspection instructions and, consequently, DGAC France issued AD F-
2006-016 to require repetitive inspections and corrective action.
    Since that [French] AD was issued, further investigation led to
the conclusion that the current ultrasonic inspection performed in
accordance with Airbus SB A300-53-0246 Revision 06, or SB A300-53-
6029 Revision 08, or SB A300-53-9014 Revision 01, as applicable, was
not reliable to detect deep crack going downward.
    Consequently, to ensure the crack depth is correctly measured
whatever the crack direction, Airbus developed a new nondestructive
testing method [eddy current]

for this special detailed inspection (SDI) and revised the affected
SBs accordingly.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of DGAC France AD F-2006-016, which is superseded, but
requires the accomplishment of repetitive SDI to replace the
previously required ultrasonic inspections [and related
investigative and corrective actions if necessary].

Related investigative actions include an ultrasonic inspection for
cracking on the forward face of the forward fitting and a detailed
inspection for cracking of the aft fitting around the fasteners.
Corrective actions include crack repairs, and modification of the
sealing fittings and sealing shims. This AD requires reporting of the
inspection results to Airbus. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket
on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2017-0520.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Airbus has issued Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-0246, Revision
08, including Appendix 1, dated April 13, 2016 (for Model A300 series
airplanes); and Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6029, Revision 12,
including Appendix 1, dated April 13, 2016 (for Model A300-600 series
airplanes). The service information describes procedures for doing an
SDI for cracking of the FR 47 forward fitting upper radius on the left-
hand and right-hand sides of the fuselage, and related investigative
and corrective actions. This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 132 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
            Action                   Labor cost         Parts cost      Cost per product          operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection...................  19 work-hours x $85                $0  $1,615 per            $213,180 per
                                per hour = $1,615.                     inspection cycle.     inspection cycle.
Reporting....................  1 work-hour x $85 per              $0  $85 per inspection    $11,220 per
                                hour = $85.                            cycle.                inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary related
investigative and corrective actions that would be required based on
the results of the inspection. We have no way of determining the number
of aircraft that might need these repairs:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                   Action                                 Labor cost                Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related investigative and Corrective         21 work-hours x $85 per hour =               $1,835          $3,620
 actions.                                     $1,785.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paperwork Reduction Act

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control
number for the collection of information required by this AD is 2120-
0056. The paperwork cost associated with this AD has been detailed in
the Costs of Compliance section of this document and includes time for
reviewing instructions, as well as completing and reviewing the
collection of information. Therefore, all reporting associated with
this AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden
and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA
at 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, ATTN: Information
Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes to
the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2017-17-05 Airbus: Amendment 39-18995; Docket No. FAA-2017-0520;
Product Identifier 2016-NM-143-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective September 25, 2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD affects AD 2007-26-14, Amendment 39-15316 (73 FR 2803,
January 16, 2008) (``AD 2007-26-14'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1) through (c)(5) of this AD, certificated in any category,
except airplanes that have been repaired as specified in Airbus
Service Bulletin A300-53-0370; or Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-
6144, as applicable.
    (1) Model A300 B2-1A, B2-1C, B2K-3C, B2-203, B4-2C, B4-103, and
B4-203 airplanes.
    (2) Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, and B4-622 airplanes.
    (3) Model A300 B4-605R and B4-622R airplanes.
    (4) Model A300 F4-605R and F4-622R airplanes.
    (5) Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of cracks initiating at the
upper radius of frame (FR) 47 and a determination that the current
inspection procedure is not reliable in detecting certain cracking
of the forward fitting of FR 47. We are issuing this AD to detect
and correct fatigue cracking of the FR 47 forward fitting upper
radius on the left-hand and right-hand sides of the fuselage, which
could propagate and result in reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Repetitive Inspections

    Except as required by paragraph (h) of this AD: Before exceeding
10,000 flight cycles since first flight of the airplane or within 30
days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, do
a special detailed inspection (SDI) for cracking of the FR 47
forward fitting upper radius on the left-hand and right-hand sides
of the fuselage, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of the applicable Airbus service information specified in paragraphs
(g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD. Repeat the inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 4,150 flight cycles, except as required by
paragraph (j) of this AD.
    (1) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-0246, Revision 08, including
Appendix 1, dated April 13, 2016.
    (2) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6029, Revision 12, including
Appendix 1, dated April 13, 2016.

(h) Initial Inspection for Airplanes Previously Inspected

    For airplanes previously inspected as specified in the
applicable Airbus service information specified in paragraphs (h)(1)
through (h)(6) of this AD and on which no cracking was found: Within
4,150 flight cycles after the most recent inspection, do the
inspection for cracking of the FR 47 forward fitting upper radius
required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (1) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-0246, Revision 06, dated
October 19, 2005.
    (2) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-0246, Revision 07, dated
September 9, 2008.
    (3) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6029, Revision 08, dated
October 19, 2005.
    (4) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6029, Revision 09, dated
September 9, 2008.
    (5) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6029, Revision 10, dated
July 9, 2009.
    (6) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6029, Revision 11, dated
September 28, 2009.

(i) Inspections for Airplanes With Abnormal Load Events

    For airplanes on which any crack was found during any inspection
done as specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-0246 or Airbus
Service Bulletin A300-53-6029, as applicable, and on which any
abnormal load event, such as hard landing or flight in excessive
turbulence, occurred within 3 months before the effective date of
this AD or occurs on or after the effective date of this AD: Within
3 months after each event, accomplish an SDI for cracking of the FR
47 forward fitting upper radius, left-hand and right-hand sides of
the fuselage, in accordance with the applicable Accomplishment
Instructions of the Airbus service information specified in
paragraphs (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD. If, during this 3-month
period, another abnormal load event occurs, and if no SDI has yet
been accomplished, before further flight after the second event,
obtain corrective action instructions from the Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA), and accomplish those instructions
accordingly.

(j) Corrective Actions for Airplanes With Cracks

    If, during any SDI as required by paragraph (g), (h), or (i) of
this AD, any crack is found: Before further flight, do the
applicable related investigative and corrective actions, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable
Airbus service information specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2)
of this AD, and obtain additional corrective action instructions
from the Manager, International Section, Transport Standards Branch,
FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA, and accomplish those
instructions accordingly before further flight.

(k) Reporting

    Submit a report of the findings (both positive and negative) of
each SDI inspection required by paragraphs (g), (h), and (i) of this
AD to Airbus Service Bulletin Reporting Online Application on Airbus
World (https://w3.airbus.com/), at the applicable time specified in
paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this AD.
    (1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the inspection.
    (2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this
AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the effective date of
this AD.

(l) Terminating Action for AD 2007-26-14

    Accomplishing any inspection required by paragraph (g) or (h) of
this AD terminates all requirements of AD 2007-26-14 for the
inspected airplane.

(m) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this

AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the International Section, send
it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (n)(2) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA
DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-
authorized signature.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a
person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number
for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5
minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of information. All
responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing
the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave.
SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance
Officer, AES-200.

(n) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA AD 2016-0150, dated July 25, 2016, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2017-0520.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone:
425-227-2125; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

(o) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-0246, Revision 08, including
Appendix 1, dated April 13, 2016.
    (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6029, Revision 12,
including Appendix 1, dated April 13, 2016.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax: +33 5 61 93 44 51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet: http://www.airbus.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 8, 2017.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-17203 Filed 8-18-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: June 18, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 118)]
[Notices]
[Page 34818-34819]
[DOCID:fr18jn08-135]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-57957; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2008-60]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Regarding Position
and Exercise Limits for Options on the DIAMONDS Trust

June 12, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 2, 2008, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``NYSE Arca'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been substantially prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has
designated this proposal as non-controversial under Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\
which renders the proposed rule change effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its rules to increase the position
and exercise limits applicable to options on the DIAMONDS Trust, Series
1 (``DIA''). The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Web site (http://www.nyse.com), at the offices of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is proposing to amend NYSE Arca Rule 6.8, pertaining
to position limits for options. The Exchange proposes to increase
position limits for options on DIA to 300,000 contracts on the same
side of the market. The Commission previously approved a similar
proposal of the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. (``CBOE'').\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47346 (February 11,
2003), 68 FR 8316 (February 20, 2003) (SR-CBOE-2002-26) (approving
an increase in the position limits and exercise limits to 300,000
for DIA options). The Commission stated that ``given the
surveillance capabilities of the [CBOE] and the depth and liquidity
in both the DIA options and the underlying cash market in DIAs, the
Commission believes it is permissible to significantly raise
position and exercise limits for DIA options without risk of
disruption to the options or underlying cash markets.'' The
Commission also stated that ``financial and reporting requirements *
* * should allow [CBOE] to detect and deter trading abuses arising
from the increased position and exercise limits, and will also allow
[CBOE] to monitor large positions in order to identify instances of
potential risk and to assess additional margin and/or capital
charges, if deemed necessary.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to NYSE Arca Rule 6.9, exercise limits for equity options
are set at the same levels as the applicable position limits.
Therefore, proposed changes to position limits for options on DIA, made
pursuant to this filing, will also be applicable to the exercise limits
for options on DIA.
    The Exchange also recently made permanent its increased position
and exercise limits for certain equity options on NYSE Arca, which were
in effect on a pilot basis.\6\ The Exchange stipulated, as part of its
proposal for such permanent approval, that ``its surveillance
procedures and options reporting procedures, in conjunction with the
financial requirements and risk management review procedures generally
in place at the clearing firms and the Options Clearing Corporation,
will serve to adequately address any concerns the Commission may have
with respect to account(s) engaging in any manipulative schemes or
assuming too high a level of risk exposure.'' \7\ These representations
also apply to the current proposal to increase the position and
exercise limits for options on DIA. The Exchange now seeks to increase
the position and exercise limits for options on DIA on NYSE Arca to the
level that such limits are in effect on CBOE and other option exchanges
(300,000 contracts on the same side of the market).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57417 (March 3,
2008), 73 FR 12788 (March 10, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2008-26).
    \7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange asserts that the justifications behind the
Commission's approval of CBOE's proposal should support the same
increased position and exercise limits on options on DIA on NYSE Arca.
Specifically, the Exchange believes that the ``structure of the DIA
options and the considerable liquidity of both the underlying cash and
options market for DIA options lessen the opportunity for manipulation
of this product and disruption in the underlying market that a lower
position limit may protect against.'' \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47346, supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the reporting requirements imposed under
the Exchange's rules will help protect against potential
manipulation.\9\ Additionally, the Exchange believes that such an
increase in position and exercise limits on options on DIA on NYSE Arca
is also required for competitive purposes as well as for purposes of
consistency and uniformity among the competing options exchanges. This,
taken in conjunction with the permanent establishment of other
increased position and exercise limits for certain equity options on
NYSE Arca, supports the Exchange's proposal related to such increased
position and exercise limits applicable to DIA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See NYSE Arca Rule 6.6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \10\ in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \11\ in
particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the public interest. Specifically,
the Exchange believes that the structure of the DIA options and the
considerable liquidity of the market for DIA options diminishes the
opportunity for manipulation of this product and disruption in the
underlying market that a lower position limit may protect against.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose

any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received by the Exchange with
respect to the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as one that:
(1) Does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the
public interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on
competition; and (3) does not become operative for 30 days from the
date of filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.
Therefore, the foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \12\ and subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule
19b-4 thereunder.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to provide the Commission
with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has fulfilled this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the operative delay
to permit the proposed rule change to become operative prior to the
30th day after filing. The Exchange believes that waiving the 30-day
operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest because doing so will allow the Exchange to immediately
increase its position and exercise limits applicable to DIA options,
which will make NYSE Arca's limits consistent with those in effect on
other option exchanges.
    The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay of
the Exchange's proposal is consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest.\14\ Therefore, the Commission designates the
proposal to be operative upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate the rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-NYSEArca-2008-60 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSEArca-2008-60. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSEArca-2008-60 and should be
submitted on or before July 9, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-13709 Filed 6-17-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 27, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44696-44698]
[FR Doc No: 2019-18396]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2019-0590]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Los Angeles Fleet Week, San Pedro, California

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone
in the Port of Los Angeles Main Channel, in support of the U. S. Coast
Guard aviation and waterborne asset demonstration for Los Angeles Fleet
Week. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on
these navigable waters in the area of the Coast Guard air and water
demonstration and to protect the high concentration of people attending
the event. This regulation would prohibit vessels from entering into,
transiting through, or remaining within the designated area unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port, Sector Los
Angeles--Long Beach, or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 10:00 a.m. August 31, 2019 through
4:00 p.m. on September 2, 2019. The rule will be enforced from 10:00
a.m. to 4:00 p.m. each day.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0590 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
rulemaking, call or email MST1 Benjamin Martin, Waterways Management
Branch, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Los Angeles--Long Beach;

telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable due to the lack
of sufficient time to provide a reasonable comment period and consider
those comments before issuing the rule and establishing the safety zone
by August 31, 2019.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to the public interest because immediate
action is needed to address potentially hazardous conditions associated
with high-speed maneuvers from waterborne vessels and aircraft for a
search and rescue demonstration.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034. The Captain of the Port, Sector Los Angeles--Long Beach (COTP)
has determined the navigational safety will be affected by the
potentially hazardous conditions associated with event safety due to
the expected high-speed maneuvers from waterborne vessels and aircraft
for a search and rescue demonstration along the main shipping channel
of the nation's most economically vital port complex. For these reasons
the Coast Guard believes that a safety zone is necessary to ensure the
safety of, and reduce the risk to, the public, and mariners, in the
Port of Los Angeles.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a temporary security zone from 10 a.m.
through 4 p.m. from August 31, 2019 to September 2, 2019, encompassing
all navigable waters from the surface to the sea floor consisting of a
line connecting the following coordinates: 33[deg]44.386' N
118[deg]16.658' W, 33[deg]44.370' N 118[deg]16.545' W, 33[deg]44.858' N
118[deg]162.86' W, 33[deg]44.897' N 118[deg]16.399' W. All coordinates
displayed are referenced by North American Datum of 1983, World
Geodetic System, 1984.
    No vessel or person is permitted to operate in the safety zone
without obtaining permission from COTP or the COTP's designated
representative. A designated representative means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other
officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local
officer designated by or assisting the COTP in the enforcement of the
security zone. To seek permission to enter, hail Coast Guard Sector Los
Angeles--Long Beach on VHF-FM Channel 16 or<PHONE_NUMBER>. Upon being
hailed by a Coast Guard vessel or designated representative, by siren,
radio, flashing light or other means, the operator of the vessel shall
proceed as directed.
    The general boating public will be notified prior to the
enforcement of the temporary safety zone via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    E.O.s 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and Review'') and 13563
(``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review'') direct agencies to
assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that
maximize net benefits including potential economic, environmental,
public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity.
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. Executive Order 13771 (``Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs, directs agencies to reduce regulation and
control regulatory costs and provides that ``for every one new
regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be identified for
elimination, and that the cost of planned regulations be prudently
managed and controlled through a budgeting process.''
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration of the safety zone. Commercial vessel traffic will
be temporarily impacted by this rule, due to its impact a designated
area of the of Los Angles main channel in the vicinity of the Port of
Los Angeles between Berth's 84-93A. The Coast Guard and Inter Agency
Unified Command will establish communications with the LA Pilots and
Vessel Traffic Service/Marine Exchange to coordinate and mitigate all
inbound and outbound commercial and recreational traffic movements
through the 0.12 square mile safety zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
security zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want
to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would
affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction
and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by

employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because
it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has
implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1
(series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety zone encompassing a 0.12
square mile area around the Los Angeles Fleet Week events, in the Port
of Los Angeles between Berth's 84-93A, effective from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.
each day from August 31, 2019 through September 2, 2019. Such actions
are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 60(a) in
Table 3-1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Implementing
Procedures 5090.1. An environmental analysis checklist supporting this
determination and Record of Environmental Consideration (REC) are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T11-0590 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T11-0590  Safety Zone; Los Angeles Fleet Week, San Pedro,
California.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters from the surface to the sea floor in an around bound by the
following coordinates; 33[deg]44.386' N 118[deg]16.658' W,
33[deg]44.370' N 118[deg]16.545' W, 33[deg]44.858' N 118[deg]162.86' W,
33[deg]44.897' N 118[deg]16.399' W. All coordinates displayed are
referenced by North American Datum of 1983, World Geodetic System,
1984.
    (b) Definitions. For the purposes of this section, designated
representative means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast
Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard
vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port Los Sector Angeles--Long Beach (COTP)
in the enforcement of the security zone.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter, hail Coast Guard Sector Los
Angeles--Long Beach on VHF-FM Channel 16 or call at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Those in the security zone must comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative.
    (3) Upon being hailed by a Coast Guard vessel or his designated
representative, by siren, radio, flashing light or other means, the
operator of the vessel shall proceed as directed.
    (d) Enforcement period. The temporary safety zone will be enforced
each day from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. from August 31, 2019 to September 2,
2019.
    (e) Informational broadcasts. The COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public of the enforcement date and times
for this safety zone, as well as any emergent safety concerns that may
delay the enforcement of the zone Local Notices to Mariners.

    Dated: August 16, 2019.
R.E. Ore,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting, Captain of the Port Sector Los
Angeles--Long Beach.
[FR Doc. 2019-18396 Filed 8-26-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P