[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57102-57104]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23175]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-87342; File No. SR-C2-2019-022]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Extend
the Pilot Period Related to the Market-Wide Circuit Breaker in Rule
6.32.01

October 18, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on October 16, 2019, Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``C2'') proposes to
extend the pilot period related to the market-wide circuit breaker in
Rule 6.32.01. The text of the proposed rule change is provided in
Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (http://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/ctwo/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements

concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Exchange Rule 6.32.01 describes the methodology for determining
when to halt trading in all stock options due to extraordinary market
volatility, i.e., market-wide circuit breakers (``MWCB''). The MWCB
mechanism was approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') to operate on a pilot basis, the term of which was to
coincide with the pilot period for the Plan to Address Extraordinary
Market Volatility Pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS (the ``LULD
Plan''),\5\ including any extensions to the pilot period for the LULD
Plan. Though the LULD Plan was primarily designed for equity markets,
the Exchange believed it would, indirectly, potentially impact the
options markets as well. Thus, the Exchange has previously adopted and
amended Rule 6.32.01 (as well as other options pilot rules) to ensure
the option markets were not harmed as a result of the Plan's
implementation and implemented such rule on a pilot basis that has
coincided with the pilot period for the Plan.\6\ The Commission
recently approved an amendment to the LULD Plan for it to operate on a
permanent, rather than pilot, basis.\7\ In light of the proposal to
make the LULD Plan permanent, the Exchange amended Rule 6.32.01 to
untie the pilot's effectiveness from that of the LULD Plan and to
extend the pilot's effectiveness to the close of business on October
18, 2019.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May 31,
2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012). The LULD Plan provides a
mechanism to address extraordinary market volatility in individual
securities.
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 68769 (January 30,
2013), 78 FR 8213 (February 5, 2013) (SR-C2-2013-006) (amending Rule
6.32.03, which was later renumbered to Rule 6.32.01, to delay the
operative date of the pilot to coincide with the initial date of
operations of the Plan); and 85624 (April 11, 2019), 84 FR 16130
(April 17, 2019) (SR-C2-2019-008) (proposal to extend the pilot for
certain options pilots, including Rule 6.32.01).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85623 (April 11,
2019), 84 FR 16086 (April 17, 2019) (Order Approving Amendment No.
18).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85624 (April 11,
2019), 84 FR 16130 (April 17, 2019) (SR-C2-2019-008) (proposal to
extend the pilot for certain options pilots, including Rule
6.32.01).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange now proposes to amend Rule 6.32.01 to extend the pilot
to the close of business on October 18, 2020. This filing does not
propose any substantive or additional changes to Rule 6.32.01. The
Exchange will use the extension period to develop with the other SROs
rules and procedures that would allow for the periodic testing of the
performance of the MWCB mechanism, with industry member participation
in such testing. The extension will also permit the exchanges to
consider enhancements to the MWCB processes such as modifications to
the Level 3 process.
    The market-wide circuit breaker under Rule 6.32.01 provides an
important, automatic mechanism that is invoked to promote stability and
investor confidence during a period of significant stress when
securities markets experience extreme broad-based declines. As stated
above, because all U.S. equity exchanges and FINRA adopted uniform
rules on a pilot basis relating to market-wide circuit breakers in 2012
(``MWCB Rules''), which are designed to slow the effects of extreme
price movement through coordinated trading halts across securities
markets when severe price declines reach levels that may exhaust market
liquidity, the Exchange, too, adopted a MWCB mechanism on a pilot basis
pursuant to Rule 6.32.01[sic] Market-wide circuit breakers provide for
trading halts in all equities and options markets during a severe
market decline as measured by a single-day decline in the S&P 500
Index.
    Pursuant to Rule 6.32.01, a market-wide trading halt will be
triggered if the S&P 500 Index declines in price by specified
percentages from the prior day's closing price of that index.
Currently, the triggers are set at three circuit breaker thresholds: 7%
(Level 1), 13% (Level 2), and 20% (Level 3). A market decline that
triggers a Level 1 or Level 2 halt after 9:30 a.m. ET and before 3:25
p.m. ET would halt market-wide trading for 15 minutes, while a similar
market decline at or after 3:25 p.m. ET would not halt market-wide
trading. A market decline that triggers a Level 3 halt, at any time
during the trading day, would halt market-wide trading until the
primary listing market opens the next trading day.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\9\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \10\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \11\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The MWCB mechanism under Rule 6.32.01 is an important, automatic
mechanism that is invoked to promote stability and investor confidence
during a period of significant stress when securities markets
experience extreme broad-based declines. Extending the MWCB pilot for
an additional year would ensure the continued, uninterrupted operation
of a consistent mechanism to halt trading across the U.S. markets while
the Exchange, with the other SROs, consider and develop rules and
procedures that would allow for the periodic testing of the performance
of the MWCB mechanism, which would include industry member
participation in such testing. The extension will also permit the
exchanges to consider enhancements to the MWCB processes such as
modifications to the Level 3 process.
    The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change promotes
just and equitable principles of trade in that it promotes transparency
and uniformity across markets concerning when and how to halt trading
in all stocks as a result of extraordinary market volatility. Based on
the foregoing, the Exchange believes the benefits to market
participants from the MWCB under Rule 6.32.01 should continue on a
pilot basis because the MWCB will promote fair and orderly markets, and
protect investors and the public interest.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the proposal would
ensure the continued, uninterrupted operation of a consistent mechanism
to halt trading across the U.S. markets while the Exchange, in
conjunction with the other SROs, consider and develop rules and
procedures that would allow for the periodic testing of the performance
of the MWCB mechanism. In addition, as noted above, the extension will
permit the exchanges to consider enhancements to the MWCB processes
such as modifications to the Level 3 process. Further, the Exchange
understands that FINRA and other national securities exchanges will
file proposals to extend their rules regarding the market-wide circuit
breaker pilot. Thus, the proposed rule change will help to ensure
consistency across market centers without implicating any competitive
issues.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) impose any significant burden on competition; and (3)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \12\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) \13\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Commission has waived the pre-filing requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \14\ normally
does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing.
However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\15\ the Commission may
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal
may become operative upon filing. Extending the pilot for an additional
year will allow the uninterrupted operation of the existing pilot to
halt trading across the U.S. markets. Therefore, the Commission
believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Commission hereby
designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon filing.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ Id.
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \16\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-C2-2019-022 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2019-022. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2019-022 and
should be submitted on or before November 14, 2019.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-23175 Filed 10-23-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: September 26, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 186)]
[Notices]
[Page 54710-54711]
[DOCID:fr26se07-131]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

RTCA Program Management Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Program Management Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a
meeting of the RTCA Program Management Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held October 11, 2007 starting at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW.,
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW.,
Suite 850, Washington, DC 20036; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (202)
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice
is hereby given for a Program Management Committee meeting. The agenda
will include:
     October 11:
     Opening Session (Welcome and Introductory Remarks, Review/
Approve Summary of June 26 Meeting, Paper No. 171-07/PMC-554).
     Publication Consideration/Approval:
     Final Draft, New Document, Safety and Performance Standard
for Air Traffic Data Link Services in Oceanic and Remote Airspace
(Oceanic SPR Standard), RTCA Paper No. 216-07/PMC-559, prepared by SC-
189.
     Final Draft, Revised DO-286A, Minimum Aviation System
Performance Standards (MASPS) for Traffic Information Service--
Broadcast (TIS-B), RTCA Paper No. 228-07/PMC-562, prepared by SC-186.
     Final Draft, New Document, Aircraft Design and
Certification for Portable Electronic Device (PED) Tolerance, RTCA
Paper No. 229-07/PMC-563, prepared by SC-202.
     Discussion:
     SC-186--Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-
B)-Discussion.
     Revised Terms of Reference.
     SC-210--Cabin Management Systems-Discussion.
     Revised Terms of Reference.
     Special Committee Chairman's Reports.
     Action Item Review:
     SC-147--Traffic Alert & Collision Avoidance System-
Discussion.

     PMC Ad Hoc Subgroup--Status Review.
     SC-203--Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)-Discussion-Status
Review.
     PMC Ad Hoc Subgroup--Report.
     SC-205--Software Considerations-Discussion-Status Review.
     Closing Session (Other Business, Document Production, Date
and Place of Next Meeting, Adjourn).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the `FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT' section. Members of the public
may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 12, 2007.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 07-4726 Filed 9-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register: December 7, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 235)]
[Notices]
[Page 71006-71007]
[DOCID:fr07de06-102]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-54841; File No. SR-ISE-2006-69]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change Relating to Fee Changes

November 30, 2006.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on November 27, 2006, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (the
``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The ISE has designated this proposal as one changing a
fee imposed by the ISE under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective
upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The ISE is proposing to amend its Schedule of Fees to extend until
June 30, 2007, a pilot program that (i) caps and waives execution and
comparison fees for transactions in options on the NASDAQ-100 Index
Tracking Stock[reg] (``QQQQ[reg]'') when a member
transacts a certain number of QQQQ option contracts, and (ii) reduces
and waives the facilitation execution and comparison fees when a member
transacts a certain number of contracts through the Exchange's
Facilitation Mechanism. The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's Web site at (http://www.iseoptions.com/legal/proposed-rule-changes.asp
), at the ISE's principal office, and at

the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the ISE included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The ISE has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The ISE proposes to amend its Schedule of Fees to extend until June
30, 2007, a pilot program that (i) caps and waives execution and
comparison fees for transactions in options on the QQQQ when a member
transacts a certain number of QQQQ option contracts, and (ii) reduces
and waives the facilitation execution and comparison fees when a member
transacts a certain number of contracts through the Exchange's
Facilitation Mechanism.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Earlier this year, the Exchange amended the pilot program by
increasing the threshold levels at which the fee waiver and
reduction applied. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54016
(June 19, 2006), 71 FR 36575 (June 27, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the QQQQ pilot program, when a member's monthly average daily
volume (``A.D.V.'') in QQQQ options reaches 10,000 contracts, the
member's execution fee for the next 2,000 QQQQ option contracts is
reduced by $.10 per contract.\6\ Further, when a member's monthly
A.D.V. in QQQQ options reaches 12,000 contracts, the Exchange waives
the entire execution fee and the comparison fee for each QQQQ option
contract traded thereafter. The Exchange instituted this pilot program
in November 2003 for a six month period,

expiring in May 2004.\7\ The Exchange extended the pilot program in May
2004 for an additional six month period, expiring in November 2004.\8\
The Exchange extended the pilot program for a one year period in
November 2004 \9\ and again in November 2005.\10\ The current pilot
program is set to expire on November 30, 2006. The Exchange now
proposes to further extend the pilot program until June 30, 2007.\11\
The Exchange seeks to extend this pilot program for competitive
reasons. This pilot program was initiated and extended in an attempt to
increase the Exchange's market share in the QQQQ option product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Telephone conversation between Samir Patel, Assistant
General Counsel, ISE, and Hong-anh Tran, Special Counsel, Division
of Market Regulation, Commission, on November 28, 2006 (clarifying
that the A.D.V. threshold is calculated on a monthly basis).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49147 (January 29,
2004), 69 FR 5629 (February 5, 2004).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49853 (June 14,
2004), 69 FR 35087 (June 23, 2004).
    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50900 (December 21,
2004), 69 FR 78075 (December 29, 2004).
    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52934 (December 9,
2005), 70 FR 74859 (December 16, 2005).
    \11\ The Exchange intends to establish, through subsequent
filings, June 30 as the date on which all of its fee programs
expire. By aligning the expiration date as such, the Exchange seeks
to manage its various fee programs more effectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The structure of the reduction and waiver of the facilitation
execution fee and the comparison fee is based on the structure of the
reduction and waiver of the QQQQ execution fee and comparison fee noted
above. That is, when a member's monthly A.D.V. in the Facilitation
Mechanism reaches 15,000 contracts, the member's facilitation execution
fee for the next 5,000 contracts transacted in the Facilitation
Mechanism would be reduced by $.10 per contract. Further, when a
member's monthly A.D.V. in the Facilitation Mechanism reaches 20,000
contracts, the Exchange would waive the entire facilitation execution
fee and the comparison fee for each contract transacted in the
Facilitation Mechanism thereafter. As with the QQQQ incentives, the
Exchange is proposing to extend this pilot program to encourage members
to use the Facilitation Mechanism.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \12\ in general, and furthers the objectives of
Sections 6(b)(4) of the Act \13\ in particular, in that it is an
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among
its members and other persons using its facilities. In particular, the
fee changes proposed hereby will enable the Exchange to continue
offering competitively priced products and services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change does not impose
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing proposed rule change has been designated as a fee
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \14\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(2) \15\ thereunder, because it establishes or changes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange. Accordingly, the proposal
will take effect upon filing with the Commission. At any time within 60
days of the filing of such proposed rule change the Commission may
summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-ISE-2006-69 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2006-69. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the ISE. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-ISE-2006-69 and should be submitted on or before
December 28, 2006.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-20714 Filed 12-6-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 55 (Friday, March 21, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15651-15654]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05415]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0796; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-111-AD;
Amendment 39-17802; AD 2014-05-30]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013-07-07 for
all The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -
900ER series airplanes. AD 2013-07-07 required inspecting to determine
the part number of the attach pins of the horizontal stabilizer rear
spar, and replacing certain attach pins. This new AD clarifies the
parts installation limitation and prohibition, and adds a new
requirement for certain airplanes on which certain attach pins were
installed. This AD was prompted by inquiries from affected operators
regarding the parts installation limitation and prohibition, and re-
installation of certain attach pins that were removed for inspection.
We are issuing this AD to prevent premature failure of the attach pins,
which could cause reduced structural integrity of the horizontal
stabilizer to fuselage attachment, resulting in loss of control of the
airplane.

DATES: This AD is effective April 25, 2014.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of May 20, 2013
(78 FR 22182, April 15, 2013).

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box
3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2013-
0796; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:
425-917-6590; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2013-07-07, Amendment 39-17411 (78 FR 22182,
April 15, 2013). AD 2013-07-07 applied to all The Boeing Company Model
737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on September 25, 2013 (78 FR 58982).
The NPRM was prompted by inquiries from affected operators regarding
the parts installation limitation and prohibition, and re-installation
of certain attach pins that were removed for inspection. The NPRM
proposed to continue to require inspecting to determine the part number
of the attach pins of the horizontal stabilizer rear spar, and
replacing certain attach pins. The NPRM also proposed to clarify the
parts installation limitation and prohibition, and add a new
requirement for certain airplanes on which certain attach pins were
installed. We are issuing this AD to prevent premature failure of the
attach pins, which could cause reduced structural integrity of the
horizontal stabilizer to fuselage attachment, resulting in loss of
control of the airplane.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comment received on the proposal
(78 FR 58982, September 25, 2013) and the FAA's response to each
comment.

Clarification of Effect of Winglet Installation

    Aviation Partners Boeing stated that the installation of winglets
per Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) ST00830SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/408E012E008616A7862578880060456C?OpenDocument&Highlight=st00830se) does
not affect the accomplishment of the manufacturer's service
instructions.
    We concur. Paragraph (c)(2) in AD 2013-07-07, Amendment 39-17411
(78 FR 22182, April 15, 2013), has been restated in this final rule and
specifies that STC ST00830SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/408E012E008616A7862578880060456C?OpenDocument&Highlight=st00830se) does
not affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by this final
rule. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST00830SE is installed, a
``change in product'' alternative method of compliance (AMOC) approval
request is not necessary to comply with the requirements of section
39.17 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 39.17).

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD as proposed except for minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (78 FR 58982, September 25, 2013) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 58982, September 25, 2013).

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 1,050 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The new requirements add no significant economic burden over that
specified in AD 2013-07-07, Amendment 39-17411 (78 FR 22182, April 15,
2013). Those costs are repeated for the convenience of affected
operators, as follows:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
             Action                   Labor cost          Parts cost       Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection and attach pin         39 work-hours x     Up to $6,312......  Up to $9,627......  Up to $10,108,350.
 replacement [actions retained     $85 per hour =
 from AD 2013-07-07, Amendment     $3,315.
 39-17411 (78 FR 22182, April
 15, 2013)].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation

is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in
this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2013-07-07, Amendment 39-17411 (78 FR 22182, April 15, 2013), and
adding the following new AD:

2014-05-30 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17802; Docket No. FAA-
2013-0796; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-111-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective April 25, 2014.

(b) Affected ADs

    (1) This AD supersedes AD 2013-07-07, Amendment 39-17411 (78 FR
22182, April 15, 2013).
    (2) This AD affects certain requirements of AD 2004-05-19,
Amendment 39-13514 (69 FR 10921, March 9, 2004; corrected April 13,
2004 (69 FR 19313)).

(c) Applicability

    (1) This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -
700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes, certificated in
any category.
    (2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST00830SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/408E012E008616A7862578880060456C?OpenDocument&Highlight=st00830se)
does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by
this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST00830SE is
installed, a ``change in product'' alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with the
requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 55, Stabilizers.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by inquiries from affected operators
regarding the parts installation limitation and prohibition, and re-
installation of certain attach pins that were removed for
inspection. We are issuing this AD to prevent premature failure of
the attach pins, which could cause reduced structural integrity of
the horizontal stabilizer to fuselage attachment, resulting in loss
of control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Part Number (P/N) Inspection

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2013-07-07, Amendment 39-17411 (78 FR 22182, April 15, 2013). For
airplanes having line numbers 1 through 3534 inclusive: Before the
accumulation of 56,000 total flight cycles, or within 3,000 flight
cycles after May 20, 2013 (the effective date of AD 2013-07-07),
whichever occurs later, inspect to determine the part number of the
attach pins of the horizontal stabilizer rear spar. A review of
airplane maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of this
inspection if the part number of the attach pin can be conclusively
determined from that review.

(h) Retained Replacement

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2013-07-07, Amendment 39-17411 (78 FR 22182, April 15, 2013). If,
during the inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD, any
horizontal stabilizer rear spar attach pin has P/N 180A1612-3 or
180A1612-4, prior to the accumulation of 56,000 total flight cycles
on the pin, or within 3,000 flight cycles after May 20, 2013 (the
effective date of AD 2013-07-07), whichever occurs later, replace
with a new attach pin having P/N 180A1612-7 or 180A1612-8,
respectively, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-55-1093, dated April
9, 2012.

(i) Retained Parts Installation Prohibition

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i)(2) of
AD 2013-07-07, Amendment 39-17411 (78 FR 22182, April 15, 2013). For
airplanes having line numbers 3535 and subsequent: As of May 20,
2013 (the effective date of AD 2013-07-07), no person may install an
attach pin of the horizontal stabilizer rear spar having P/N
180A1612-3 or 180A1612-4 on any airplane.

(j) Retained Terminating Action for AD 2004-05-19, Amendment 39-13514
(69 FR 10921, March 9, 2004; Corrected April 13, 2004 (69 FR 19313))

    This paragraph restates the provisions of paragraph (j) of AD
2013-07-07, Amendment 39-17411 (78 FR 22182, April 15, 2013).
Accomplishment of the actions required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of
this AD terminates the requirements of paragraphs (a), (b), (c),
(d), and (e) of AD 2004-05-19, Amendment 39-13514 (69 FR 10921,
March 9, 2004; corrected April 13, 2004 (69 FR 19313)), for the rear
spar attach pins only.

(k) New Parts Installation Limitation

    For airplanes having line numbers 1 through 3534 inclusive: As
of the effective date of this AD, an attach pin of the horizontal
stabilizer rear spar having P/N 180A1612-3 or 180A1612-4 may be
installed on an airplane, provided it is replaced with an attach pin
having P/N 180A1612-7 or 180A1612-8, as applicable, prior to the
accumulation of 56,000 total flight cycles on the attach pin. The
replacement must be done in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-55-
1093, dated April 9, 2012.

(l) New Attach Pin Replacement

    For airplanes having line numbers 1 through 3534 inclusive on
which an attach pin of the horizontal stabilizer rear spar having P/
N 180A1612-7 or 180A1612-8 has been replaced with an attach pin
having P/N 180A1612-3 or 180A1612-4 before the effective date of
this AD: Prior to the accumulation of 56,000 total flight cycles on
the attach pin, or within 1,000 flight cycles on the airplane after
the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, replace the
attach pin having P/N 180A1612-3 or 180A1612-4 with an attach pin
having P/N 180A1612-7 or 180A1612-8, as applicable, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-55-1093, dated April 9, 2012.

(m) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (n) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) AMOCs approved previously for AD 2013-07-07, Amendment 39-
17411 (78 FR 22182, April 15, 2013), are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of this AD.

(n) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Nancy Marsh,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(o) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
May 20, 2013 (78 FR 22182, April 15, 2013).
    (i) Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-55-1093, dated
April 9, 2012.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (4) For Boeing service information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (5) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
    (6) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 3, 2014.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-05415 Filed 3-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 90 (Thursday, May 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27235-27236]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11165]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OA-2013-0320; FRL-9810-5]

Technical Guidance for Assessing Environmental Justice in
Regulatory Analysis

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Announcement of issuance of draft guidance for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued for
public comment a document entitled, ``Technical Guidance for Assessing
Environmental Justice in Regulatory Analysis.'' The purpose of this
guidance is to provide EPA analysts with technical information on how
to consider environmental justice in regulatory analyses. This guidance
takes into account EPA's past experience in integrating EJ into the
rulemaking process, and underscores EPA's ongoing commitment to
ensuring the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people
with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of
environmental laws, regulations, and policies.
    A Science Advisory Board (SAB) review of this document will be
announced in May 2013. Information on the SAB review can be found here:
http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/02ad90b136fc21ef85256eba00436459/0f7d1a0d7d15001b8525783000673ac3!OpenDocument&TableRow=2.0#2.
    In addition, the EPA will host two webinars on the draft guidance.

Wednesday, May 29, 1:00-2:30 p.m. EST; https://epa.connectsolutions.com/r4nnz6umjci/.
Thursday, June 6, 3:00-4:30 p.m. EST; https://epa.connectsolutions.com/r8fs6ctfovg/.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 8, 2013, 60 days
after publication in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OA-
2013-0320 by one of the following methods:
     www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
     Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Technical Guidance for Assessing Environmental
Justice in Regulatory Analysis, Environmental Protection Agency,
Mailcode: 1890T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
     Hand Delivery: EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC. Such deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be
made for deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OA-2013-
0320. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
at the Technical Guidance for Assessing Environmental Justice in
Regulatory Analysis Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the Technical Guidance for
Assessing Environmental Justice in Regulatory Analysis is (202) 566-
2273.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Kelly Maguire, Office of Policy,
National Center for Environmental Economics, Mail code 1809T,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Mail code
1809T, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Technical Guidance for Assessing
Environmental Justice in Regulatory Analysis is available in the public
docket for this notice. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

I. General Information

    The Technical Guidance for Assessing Environmental Justice in
Regulatory Analysis begins to address the issue of how to analytically
consider environmental justice in regulatory analyses. It directs EPA
analysts to assess whether potential environmental justice (EJ)
concerns exist prior to the rulemaking and whether such concerns are
likely to be exacerbated or mitigated for each regulatory option under
consideration. The guidance makes recommendations designed to ensure
consistency across EPA assessments of potential EJ concerns for
regulatory actions. The recommendations encourage analysts to conduct
the highest quality analysis feasible, recognizing that data
limitations, time and resource constraints, and analytic challenges
will vary by media and circumstance. They are not designed to be
prescriptive and do not mandate the use of a specific approach. No new
risk assessment or socio-economic assessment methods are required, thus
minimizing resource or analytical burdens. This guidance takes into
account EPA's past experience in integrating EJ into the rulemaking
process, and underscores EPA's ongoing commitment to ensuring the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement of all people with respect to the
development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies. This guidance will enable EPA to conduct
better analysis of regulations which will ultimately enable EPA to make
better decisions.

II. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI). In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
     Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other
identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and
page number).
     Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
     Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives
and substitute language for your requested changes.
     Describe any assumptions and provide any technical
information and/or data used.
     If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
     Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
     Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the
use of profanity or personal threats.
     Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

    Dated: May 2, 2013.
Michael L. Goo,
Associate Administrator, Office of Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-11165 Filed 5-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7370-7371]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02613]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0942; Special Conditions No. 25-515-SC]

Special Conditions: Bombardier Aerospace Inc., Models BD-500-1A10
and BD-500-1A11 Series Airplanes; Autobraking System Loads

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final special conditions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Bombardier
Aerospace Inc. Models BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 series airplanes.
These airplanes will have novel or unusual design features associated
with the autobraking system for use during landing. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for this design feature. These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary
to establish a level of safety

equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.

DATES: Effective Date: March 10, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Freisthler, FAA, Airframe and
Cabin Safety Branch, ANM-115 Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-
3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 10, 2009, Bombardier Inc. applied for a type
certificate for their new Models BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A1 series
airplanes (hereafter collectively referred to as ``C-series''). The C-
series airplanes are swept-wing monoplanes with an aluminum alloy
fuselage sized for 5-abreast seating. Passenger capacity is designated
as 110 for the Model BD-500-1A10 and 125 for the Model BD-500-1A11.
Maximum takeoff weight is 131,000 pounds for the Model BD-500-1A10 and
144,000 pounds for the Model BD-500-1A11.

Type Certification Basis

    Under the provisions of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR) 21.17, Bombardier Inc. must show that the C-series airplanes meet
the applicable provisions of part 25, as amended by Amendment 25-1
through 25-129.
    If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the C-series airplanes because of a
novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed
under the provisions of Sec.  21.16.
    Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the
other model under Sec.  21.101.
    In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the C-series airplanes must comply with the fuel vent and
exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36, and the FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under section 611 of Public Law 92-574,
the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
    The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec.  11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec.  21.17(a)(2).

Novel or Unusual Design Features

    The C-series airplanes will incorporate the following novel or
unusual design features: The C-series airplanes will have an autobrake
system. This is a pilot-selectable function that allows earlier maximum
braking at landing without pilot pedal input. When the autobrake system
is armed before landing, it automatically commands maximum braking at
main wheels touchdown. Normal procedures remain unchanged and call for
manual braking after nose wheel touchdown.

Discussion

    Section 25.493 addresses braked roll loads but does not contain a
specific ``pitchover'' requirement addressing the loading on the nose
gear, the nose gear surrounding structure, and the forward fuselage.
Moreover, Sec.  25.493 specifies airplane attitudes in accordance with
figure 6 of appendix A to part 25, which are level landing attitudes.
For airplanes with traditional braking systems, the current ground load
requirements are considered adequate for the design of the nose gear
and airframe structure. However, the C-Series airplane autobrake
system, which could apply maximum braking at the main wheels with the
airplane in a tail-down attitude well before the nose touches down,
will cause a high nose gear sink rate and potentially higher gear and
airframe loads.
    Part 25 does not contain adequate requirements to address the
potentially higher structural loads that could result from this type of
braking system. In addition, the effects on fatigue covered by Sec.
25.571 also need to be considered. Therefore, FAA has determined that
additional airworthiness standards are needed for the certification of
this unusual design feature. These special conditions propose
airworthiness standards for the certification of the C-series airplanes
with an autobrake system.

Discussion of Comments

    Notice of proposed special conditions No. FAA-2013-0942 for the
Bombardier C-series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on
November 12, 2013 (78 FR 67321). No comments were received, and the
special conditions are adopted as proposed.

Applicability

    As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Models BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 series airplanes. Should Bombardier
Inc. apply at a later date for a change to the type certificate to
include another model incorporating the same novel or unusual design
feature, the special conditions would apply to that model as well.

Conclusion

    This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one series of airplanes. It is not a rule of general applicability.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25

    Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.

The Special Conditions

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Bombardier Inc. Models BD-500-1A10 and
BD-500-1A11 series airplanes.
    Autobraking System Loads. A landing pitchover condition must be
addressed that takes into account the effect of the autobrake system.
The airplane is assumed to be at the design maximum landing weight, or
at the maximum weight allowed with the autobrake system on. The
airplane is assumed to land in a tail-down attitude at the speeds
defined by Sec.  25.481. Following main gear contact, the airplane is
assumed to rotate about the main gear wheels at the highest pitch rate
generated by the autobrake system. This is considered a limit load
condition from which ultimate loads must also be determined. Loads must
be determined for a critical fuel and payload distribution and centers
of gravity. Nose gear loads, as well as airframe loads, must be
determined. The airplane must support these loads as described in Sec.
25.305.
    In addition to the above airworthiness standards, fatigue loads
must also be determined and applied in accordance to Sec.  25.571.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 31, 2014.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-02613 Filed 2-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 70435]
[FR Doc No: 2016-24627]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4281-DR]; [Docket ID FEMA-2016-0001]

Iowa; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for State of Iowa (FEMA-4281-DR), dated September 29, 2016, and related
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 30, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, James N. Russo,
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for
this disaster.

    This action terminates the appointment of David G. Samaniego as
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2016-24627 Filed 10-11-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 210 (Monday, October 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67169-67170]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28102]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Project Nos. 14164-000; 14189-000; 14198-000]

Riverbank Hydro No. 10 LLC Lock Hydro Friends Fund XL FFP Project
56 LLC; Notice of Competing Preliminary Permit Applications Accepted
for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Competing
Applications

    On May 2, 2011, Riverbank Hydro No. 10 LLC (Riverbank), and on May
3, 2011, Lock Hydro Friends Fund XL (Lock Hydro), and FFP Project 56
LLC (FFP 56) filed preliminary permit applications, pursuant to section
4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study the feasibility of a
hydropower

project at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (Corps) Kentucky River
Lock & Dam No. 3, located on the Kentucky River, in Henry and Owen
Counties, Kentucky. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if
issued, is to grant the permit holder priority to file a license
application during the permit term. A preliminary permit does not
authorize the permit holder to perform any land-disturbing activities
or otherwise enter upon lands or waters owned by others without the
owners' express permission.
    Riverbank's Project No. 14164-000 would consist of: (1) A forebay;
(2) an intake structure; (3) a powerhouse containing one generating
unit with a total capacity of 9.8 megawatts (MW); (4) a tailrace
structure; and (5) an 8.1-mile-long, 25 kilo-volt (kV) transmission
line. The project would have an estimated average annual generation of
28.6 gigawatt-hours (GWh), and operate run-of-river utilizing surplus
water from the Kentucky River Lock & Dam No. 3, as directed by the
Corps.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Kuo-Bao Tong, Riverbank Power Corporation,
Royal Bank Plaza, South Tower, P.O. Box 166, 200 Bay Street, Suite
3230, Toronto, ON, Canada M5J2J4.<PHONE_NUMBER> x 154.
    Lock Hydro's Project No. 14189-000 would consist of: (1) One lock
frame modules, the frame module will be 45-feet long, 20-feet-high and
contain four generating units with a total combined capacity of 3.0 MW;
(2) a new switchyard containing a transformer; and (3) a proposed 2.0-
mile-long, 115 kV transmission line to an existing distribution line.
The proposed project would have an average annual generation of 13.149
GWh, and operate run-of-river utilizing surplus water from the Kentucky
River Lock & Dam No. 3, as directed by the Corps.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Wayne F. Krouse, Hydro Green Energy, 5090
Richmond Avenue 390, Houston, TX 77056.<PHONE_NUMBER> x 709.
    FFP 56's Project No. 14198-000 would consist of: (1) An 150-foot-
long, 100-foot-wide approach channel; (2) a powerhouse, located on the
east side of the dam, containing two generating units with a total
capacity of 5.8 MW; (3) a 200-foot-long, 75-foot-wide tailrace; (4) a
4.6/25 KV substation; and (5) a 0.25-mile-long, 25 kV transmission
line. The proposed project would have an average annual generation of
23.2 GWh, and operate run-of-river utilizing surplus water from the
Kentucky River Lock & Dam No. 3, as directed by the Corps.
    Applicant Contact: Ms. Ramya Swaminathan, Free Flow Power Corp.,
239 Causeway Street, Suite 300, Boston, MA 02114.<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Michael Spencer<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(202) 502-
6093.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and
competing applications may be filed electronically via the Internet.
See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's
Web site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support. Although the Commission strongly encourages electronic filing,
documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an original and
seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-14164-000, P-14189-000, or P-14198-000) in
the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support.

    Dated: October 25, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-28102 Filed 10-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 95 (Thursday, May 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28877-28879]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11606]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2013-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1317]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Title
44, Part 65 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44 CFR part 65). The
LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to calculate
appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and the
contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will become effective on the
dates listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS
report in effect prior to this determination for the listed
communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has ninety (90)
days in which to request through the community that the Deputy
Associate Administrator for Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
(email)

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         Chief executive                         Online location of
        State and county           Location and case       officer of         Community map        letter of map        Effective date of     Community
                                          No.               community          repository             revision             modification          No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florida: St. Johns..............  Unincorporated       Mr. Michael D.      St. Johns County    http://                July 11, 2013........       125147
                                   areas of St. Johns   Wanchick, St.       Administrative      www.bakeraecom.com/
                                   (13-04-1159P).       Johns County        Building, 4020      index.php/florida/st-
                                                        Administrator,      Lewis Speedway,     johns/.
                                                        500 San Sebastian   St. Augustine, FL
                                                        View, St.           32084.
                                                        Augustine, FL
                                                        32084.
New Mexico:
    Bernalillo..................  City of Albuquerque  The Honorable       600 2nd Street      http://www.rampp-      June 17, 2013........       350002
                                   (13-06-1053P).       Richard J. Berry,   Northwest,          team.com/lomrs.htm.
                                                        Mayor, City of      Albuquerque, NM
                                                        Albuquerque, P.O.   87102.
                                                        Box 1293,
                                                        Albuquerque, NM
                                                        87103.
    Bernalillo..................  Unincorporated       The Honorable       Bernalillo County,  http://www.rampp-      June 17 , 2013.......       350001
                                   areas of             Maggie Hart         2400 Broadway       team.com/lomrs.htm.
                                   Bernalillo County    Stebbins,           Southeast,
                                   (13-06-1053P).       Chairman,           Albuquerque, NM
                                                        Bernalillo County   87102.
                                                        Board of
                                                        Commissioners, 1
                                                        Civic Plaza
                                                        Northwest,
                                                        Albuquerque, NM
                                                        87102.
Oklahoma:
    Comanche....................  City of Lawton (11-  The Honorable Fred  City Hall, 212      http://www.rampp-      May 30, 2013.........       400049
                                   06-3356P).           L. Fitch, Mayor,    Southwest 9th       team.com/lomrs.htm.
                                                        City of Lawton,     Street, Lawton,
                                                        212 Southwest 9th   OK 73501.
                                                        Street, Lawton,
                                                        OK 73501.
    Oklahoma....................  City of Oklahoma     The Honorable Mick  420 West Main       http://www.rampp-      July 11, 2013........       405378
                                   City (12-06-2435P).  Cornett, Mayor,     Street, Suite       team.com/lomrs.htm.
                                                        City of Oklahoma    700, Oklahoma
                                                        City, 200 North     City, OK 73102.
                                                        Walker Avenue,
                                                        3rd Floor,
                                                        Oklahoma City, OK
                                                        73102.
    Oklahoma....................  City of Oklahoma     The Honorable Mick  420 West Main       http://www.rampp-      July 11, 2013........       405378
                                   City (12-06-3471P).  Cornett, Mayor,     Street, Suite       team.com/lomrs.htm.
                                                        City of Oklahoma    700, Oklahoma
                                                        City, 200 North     City, OK 73102.
                                                        Walker Avenue,
                                                        3rd Floor,
                                                        Oklahoma City, OK
                                                        73102.
    Oklahoma....................  Unincorporated       The Honorable Ray   Oklahoma County     http://www.rampp-      July 11, 2013........       400466
                                   areas of Oklahoma    Vaughn, Chairman,   Courthouse, 320     team.com/lomrs.htm.
                                   County (12-06-       Oklahoma County     Robert S. Kerr
                                   2435P).              Board of            Avenue, Suite
                                                        Commissioners,      101, Oklahoma
                                                        320 Robert S.       City, OK 73102.
                                                        Kerr Avenue,
                                                        Suite 101,
                                                        Oklahoma City, OK
                                                        73102.
Texas:
    Bexar.......................  City of San Antonio  The Honorable       Municipal Plaza,    http://www.rampp-      July 5, 2013.........       480045
                                   (12-06-3532P).       Julian Castro,      114 West Commerce   team.com/lomrs.htm.
                                                        Mayor, City of      Street, 7th
                                                        San Antonio, P.O.   Floor, San
                                                        Box 839966, San     Antonio, TX 78205.
                                                        Antonio, TX 78283.

    Bexar.......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable       Bexar County        http://www.rampp-      July 5, 2013.........       480035
                                   areas of Bexar       Nelson W. Wolff,    Public Works        team.com/lomrs.htm.
                                   County (12-06-       Bexar County        Department, 233
                                   3532P).              Judge, Paul         North Pecos-La
                                                        Elizondo Tower,     Trinidad Street,
                                                        101 West Nueva      Suite 420, San
                                                        Street, 10th        Antonio, TX 78207.
                                                        Floor, San
                                                        Antonio, TX 78205.
    Bexar.......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable       Bexar County        http://www.rampp-      July 11, 2013........       480035
                                   areas of Bexar       Nelson W. Wolff,    Public Works        team.com/lomrs.htm.
                                   County (13-06-       Bexar County        Department, 233
                                   0667P).              Judge, Paul         North Pecos-La
                                                        Elizondo Tower,     Trinidad Street,
                                                        101 West Nueva      Suite 420, San
                                                        Street, 10th        Antonio, TX 78207.
                                                        Floor, San
                                                        Antonio, TX 78205.
    Collin......................  City of Frisco (12-  The Honorable       6101 Frisco Square  http://www.rampp-      July 8, 2013.........       480134
                                   06-2227P).           Maher Maso,         Boulevard, 3rd      team.com/lomrs.htm.
                                                        Mayor, City of      Floor, Frisco, TX
                                                        Frisco, 6101        75034.
                                                        Frisco Square
                                                        Boulevard, 3rd
                                                        Floor, Frisco, TX
                                                        75034.
    Collin......................  City of McKinney     The Honorable       222 North           http://www.rampp-      July 8, 2013.........       480135
                                   (12-06-2227P).       Brian               Tennessee Street,   team.com/lomrs.htm.
                                                        Loughmiller,        McKinney, TX
                                                        Mayor, City of      75069.
                                                        McKinney, 222
                                                        North Tennessee
                                                        Street, McKinney,
                                                        TX 75069.
    Collin......................  City of Plano (12-   The Honorable Phil  1520 Avenue K,      http://www.rampp-      July 5, 2013.........       480140
                                   06-2231P).           Dyer, Mayor, City   Plano, TX 75074.    team.com/lomrs.htm.
                                                        of Plano, 1520
                                                        Avenue K, Plano,
                                                        TX 75074.
    Dallas......................  Town of Sunnyvale    The Honorable Jim   Town Hall, 537      http://www.rampp-      July 12, 2013........       480188
                                   (12-06-1197P).       Phaup, Mayor,       Long Creek Road,    team.com/lomrs.htm.
                                                        Town of             Sunnyvale, TX
                                                        Sunnyvale, 127      75182.
                                                        North Collins
                                                        Road, Sunnyvale,
                                                        TX 75182.
    Harris......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable Ed    Harris County,      http://www.rampp-      May 31, 2013.........       480287
                                   areas of Harris      M. Emmett, Harris   10555 Northwest     team.com/lomrs.htm.
                                   County (12-06-       County Judge,       Freeway, Houston,
                                   2602P).              1001 Preston        TX 77002.
                                                        Street, Suite
                                                        911, Houston, TX
                                                        77002.
    Kaufman.....................  City of Dallas (12-  The Honorable Mike  City Hall, 320      http://www.rampp-      July 12, 2013........       480171
                                   06-1197P).           Rawlings, Mayor,    East Jefferson      team.com/lomrs.htm.
                                                        City of Dallas,     Boulevard, Room
                                                        1500 Marilla        321, Dallas, TX
                                                        Street, Room 5EN,   75203.
                                                        Dallas, TX 75201.
Virginia:
    Fairfax.....................  Town of Herndon (12- The Honorable Lisa  Municipal Center,   http://www.rampp-      July 11, 2013........       510052
                                   03-2159P).           C. Merkel, Mayor,   777 Lynn Street,    team.com/lomrs.htm.
                                                        Town of Herndon,    Herndon, VA 20170.
                                                        P.O. Box 427,
                                                        Herndon, VA 20172.
    Fairfax.....................  Unincorporated       The Honorable       Fairfax County      http://www.rampp-      July 11, 2013........       515525
                                   areas of Fairfax     Sharon Bulova,      Department of       team.com/lomrs.htm.
                                   County (12-03-       Chairman-at-        Public Works and
                                   2159P).              Large, Fairfax      Environmental
                                                        County Board of     Services, 12000
                                                        Supervisors,        Government Center
                                                        12000 Government    Parkway, Suite
                                                        Center Parkway,     449, Fairfax, VA
                                                        Suite 530,          22035.
                                                        Fairfax, VA 22035.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2013-11606 Filed 5-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P