[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 23445]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08428]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. 0279]

Safety Zones; Annual Events in the Captain of the Port Buffalo
Zone--Lake Erie Open Water Swim

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce a safety zone for the Lake Erie
Open Water Swim. Our regulation for annual events in the Captain of the
Port Buffalo Zone identifies the regulated area for this event in
Cleveland, OH. This action is necessary and intended for the safety of
life and property on navigable waters during the event. During the
enforcement period, no person or vessel may enter the respective safety
zone without the permission of the Captain of the Port Buffalo.

DATES: The regulations listed in 33 CFR 165.939 will be enforced for
the Lake Erie Open Water Swim safety zone as listed in item b.12 in the
Table to Sec.  165.939 from 6:45 a.m. through 11:15 a.m. on July 9,
2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notice of enforcement, call or email Jared Stevens, Waterways
Management Division, Marine Safety Unit Cleveland, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone
listed in 33 CFR 165.939 item b.12 in Table 1 for the Lake Erie Open
Water Swim from 6:45 a.m. through 11:15 a.m. on July 9, 2022. This
action is being taken to provide for the safety of life on navigable
waterways during this event. Our regulation for annual events in the
Captain of the Port Buffalo zone, Sec.  165.939, specifies the location
of the safety zone for the Lake Erie Open Water Swim as all U.S. waters
of Lake Erie, south of a line drawn between positions 41[deg]29'30'' N,
081[deg]44'21'' W and 41[deg]29'21'' N, 081[deg]45'04'' W to the shore.
During the enforcement period, as reflected in Sec.  165.23, entry
into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone during an
enforcement period is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port Buffalo or a designated representative. Those seeking
permission to enter the safety zone may request permission from the
Captain of Port Buffalo via channel 16, VHF-FM. Vessels and persons
granted permission to enter the safety zone shall obey the directions
of the Captain of the Port Buffalo or a designated representative.
While within a safety zone, all vessels shall operate at the minimum
speed necessary to maintain a safe course.
    In addition to this notice of enforcement in the Federal Register,
the Coast Guard plans to provide notification of this enforcement
period via the Broadcast Notice to Mariners or Local Notice to
Mariners. If the Captain of the Port Buffalo determines that the safety
zone need not be enforced for the full duration stated in this notice,
they may use a Broadcast Notice to Mariners to grant general permission
to enter the respective safety zone.

    Dated: April 11, 2022.
L.M. Littlejohn,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2022-08428 Filed 4-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: November 20, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 223)]
[Notices]
[Page 60254]
[DOCID:fr20no09-60]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-210-000]

Viridian Energy P; LLC Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

November 13, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Viridian Energy PA LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is December 3, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-27920 Filed 11-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: May 23, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 101)]
[Notices]
[Page 30179-30182]
[DOCID:fr23my08-126]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-57827; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2008-49]

 Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Rule 10.12 (Minor Rule Plan) and
Underlying Rules

May 15, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 14, 2008, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or the ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been substantially prepared by the Exchange. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 10.12 (Minor Rule Plan)
(``MRP'') and other related rules that underlie the minor rules
violations, including Rules 9.2(c) (Customer Records), 11.1 (Adherence
to Law), and 11.18 (Supervision).
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at NYSE Arca's
principal office, the Commission's Public Reference Room, and http://
www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NYSE Arca included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Minor Rule Plan fosters compliance with applicable rules and
also helps to reduce the number and extent of rule violations committed
by Options Trading Permit (``OTP'') Holders, OTP Firms, and associated
persons. The Exchange's enforcement staff has found that the MRP is
particularly useful in reducing both the number and extent of rule
violations because Rule 10.12 enables staff to promptly impose a
limited but meaningful financial penalty soon after the violations are
detected. The prompt imposition of a financial penalty helps to quickly
educate and improve the conduct of OTP Holders, OTP Firms, and
associated persons that have engaged in inadvertent or otherwise minor
violations of the Exchange's rules, particularly those parties who may
not pay attention to mere warnings that they are violating Exchange
rules. By promptly imposing a meaningful financial penalty for such
violations, the MRP focuses on correcting conduct before it gives rise
to more serious enforcement action.
    The Exchange has observed that new and altered patterns of activity
by OTP Holders and Firms as well as numerous additions and amendments
to other Exchange rules have created the need for revisions to the MRP
as well as the underlying rules, which are described in greater detail
below. The changes are designed to update Rule 10.12 to encompass new
types of violations as well as update or otherwise correct existing MRP
provisions and further clarify the circumstances when use of the MRP is
appropriate.
    The MRP will continue to be used for inadvertent and occasional
rule violations. Serious violations of Exchange rules will continue to
be addressed through formal enforcement action.

Rule 10.12--Minor Rule Plan

Rule 10.12(e)--Minor Rule Plan

    The Exchange proposes to clarify that any person or organization
found in violation of a minor rule under Rule 10.12 is not required to
report such violation on SEC Form BD or Form U-4.

Rule 10.12(h)--Minor Rule Plan: Options Floor Decorum and Minor Trading
Rule Violations

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 10.12(h) to reflect recent
changes in options trading requirements, remove obsolete rule
references, and create consistency with other exchanges in the
imposition of fines.
    In particular, the proposals include:
     (h)(2)--Amended to reflect that the violation includes all
of Rule 6.67.
     (h)(9)--Amended to reflect that OTP Holders and Firms are
no longer required to be physically present on the trading floor.
     (h)(12)--Amended to reflect that Rule 6.2 Commentary .02
is not related to the use of hand signals and also to remove an
obsolete reference to Rule 6.67.
     (h)(13)--Amended to reflect reference to Rule 6.2(h)
relating to registration of telephones on the trading floor.
     (h)(14)--Amended to remove the reference to Rule 6.69
because it is no longer relevant to the violation.
     (h)(15)--Removed because the provision is redundant with
subsection (16).
     (h)(16)--Amended to consolidate certain violations of Rule
6.2.
     (h)(18)--Removed because the provision is redundant with
subsection (16).
     (h)(20)--Amended to remove an obsolete rule reference due
to all orders being electronically stamped.
     (h)(21)--Amended to include position and exercise limit
violations.
     (h)(22)--Amended to remove the violation because it is
incorporated in subsection (21).
     (h)(23)--Amended to remove reference to Rule 6.38(c)
because the rule no longer exists.
     (h)(28)--Amended to remove reference to Rule 6.37(d)
because the rule no longer relates to Market Makers' obligations to
trade or update an existing market.
     (h)(29)--Amended to include failure to comply with certain
trade-through provisions.
     (h)(30)--Amended (i) to delete a reference to the Trading
Crowd/LMM Questionnaire, which is no longer administered by the
Exchange and (ii) to include violations of Authorized Trader Rules as
contained in Rules 6.34 and 6.34A.
     (h)(34)--Amended to include order exposure requirement
violations.
     (h)(35)--Amended to include unlocking or uncrossing a
market violations.
     (h)(36)--Amended to clarify present rule and reflect
correct rule reference.
     (h)(37)--Amended to reflect that Market Makers no longer
have a one-month grace period prior to applying for a primary
appointment and reflect current rule.
     (h)(38)--Amended to reflect correct rule text and expand
scope of violation.
     (h)(39)--Amended to reflect correct rule text.
     (h)(40)--Amended to reflect correct rule reference.
     (h)(42)--Amended to reflect correct rule reference.
     (h)(43)--Amended to remove obsolete rule.
    Exchange systems now have a filter that electronically prevents
Market Makers from entering quotes in issues outside their primary
appointment.
     (h)(45)--Amended to reflect the addition of proposed Rule
11.1(b) and to remove obsolete rule text.
     (h)(46)--Amended to reflect correct rule reference.

Rule 10.12(j)--Minor Rule Plan: Record Keeping and Other Minor Rule
Violations

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 10.12(j) to add several minor
violations related to record keeping and other violations. Exchange
staff frequently encounters inadvertent or otherwise minor violations
of Rules 2.17, 2.23, 2.25, 9.2(a)-(c), 9.17, 11.3, 11.18(a)-(c), and
11.19. Such minor violations do not give rise to formal enforcement
action. However, staff believes that it can further enhance compliance
with these rules by imposing MRP fines, which will draw OTP Holders'
and Firms' attention to the need for improved compliance by promptly
imposing meaningful, but limited financial penalties for violations.

10.12(k)--Minor Rule Plan: Recommended Fine Schedule

    The Exchange proposes to change the procedure set forth in the MRP
fine schedules to escalate MRP fine levels in cases involving multiple
instances of the same offense.
    This change will enhance the fair administration of the MRP in the
context of higher speed and volume of

electronic trading on the NYSE Arca Marketplace.
    Currently, the MRP Recommended Fine Schedule sets forth an initial
MRP fine for a ``First Violation,'' as well as a higher level for a
``Second Violation'' and a still higher level for a ``Third
Violation.''
    This escalation plan, which predates the widespread use of
electronic trading on the Exchange, has led to several difficulties
when applied to the much greater speed and volume of electronic
trading.
    While the fine escalation is meant to deter repeat offenses, it
often fails to deliver this effect, because OTP Holders and Firms
engaged in the high speed and volume of electronic trading can
frequently incur ``second'' and ``third'' offenses before they are
sanctioned or even notified of the initial violation.
    For the same reason, these OTP Holders and Firms complain that it
is unfair for them to incur escalated fine levels for second and third
violations before they learn of their first violations.
    Additionally, the current fine schedule does not allow an MRP
sanction for any more than three violations. In some cases, this is
appropriate, but in other cases, it makes sense to impose an MRP fine
for the fourth violation as for the first three.
    The MRP can best assist the Exchange's regulatory and enforcement
efforts if it provides Exchange officials with discretion to determine
how to address particular instances of multiple violations, rather than
implicitly requiring formal enforcement action whenever there are more
than three violations.
    To address these concerns, the Exchange proposes to modify the
Recommended Fine Schedules in NYSE Arca Rule 10.12(k) so that MRP fines
are escalated based not on the number of ``violations,'' but upon the
number of times the Exchange has imposed one or more MRP fines upon a
Permit Holder for the violation of a particular rule. The three current
column headers in the Fine Schedules that specify different fine levels
for first, second, and third ``violations'' will be replaced with
``First Level,'' ``Second Level,'' and ``Third Level.''
    With this change, the Fine Schedule will continue to specify the
fine to be imposed for each violation, but the first time a Permit
Holder is fined under the MRP for the violation of a given rule, the
fine for each violation will be imposed at the ``First Level,'' whether
there is one or more than one such violation.
    Example:
    Due to a newly-employed floor broker's misunderstanding the
requirements of NYSE Arca Rule 6.47 and not being corrected for an
entire afternoon, the employing OTP Holder, which has no previous rules
violations, executes three cross transactions that afternoon on the
Exchange that do not satisfy all the requirements of NYSE Arca Rule
6.47. Under the current MRP Fine Schedule in NYSE Arca Rule
10.12(i)(3), the OTP Holder would be charged under the MRP with a first
violation fine of $1,000, a second violation fine of $2,500, and a
third violation fine of $3,500, for a total MRP fine of $7,000. The
escalation for the second and third offenses would be imposed under the
current Fine Schedule even though all the violations occurred in the
same afternoon, and the second and third violations occurred before the
OTP Holder became aware of the first violation.
    By contrast, under the change in the Fine Schedule proposed here,
the fines no longer escalate based upon the number of offenses, but
instead based on the number of times the OTP Holder has been fined for
the same offense. Because the OTP Holder here had not previously been
fined for violations of Rule 6.47, the OTP Holder would receive the
``First Level'' of $1,000 per violation for each of the three
violations, for a total MRP fine of $3,000.
    If the OTP Holders and Firms were later fined again under the MRP
for more such violations, the fine for each violation would then be
$2,500. This proposed new procedure for escalating MRP fines is largely
the same as the escalation procedure specified by the New York Stock
Exchange LLC (``NYSE'') in its ``List of Exchange Rule Violations and
Fines'' for imposing summary fines pursuant to NYSE Rule 476A.
    It will continue to be the case that nothing in the MRP will
require the imposition of a MRP fine when Exchange enforcement
officials believe that repeat violations or other aggravating factors
warrant formal enforcement action.

Other Changes to Rule 10.12(k)

    The fines for the current and proposed minor rule violations in
subsections (h) and (j) are reflected in the Recommend Fine Schedule in
Rule 10.12(k). The Exchange staff believes that the proposed fines are
fair in relation to the scope and occurrence of the MRP violation by
OTP Holders and Firms.
    The Exchange has also proposed to amend Rules 10.12(k)(i) and
10.12(k)(iii) to include new footnotes 1 and 3 respectively. Rules
6.94(a) and (c) require OTP Holders to avoid violations of the trade-
through rules and, where such violation is unavoidable, to provide
satisfaction orders. Proposed footnote 1 enables the Exchange to
require that violators of these rules not only pay the specified MRP
fine amounts for such violations, but also disgorge any quantifiable
monetary gains attributable to these violations. The Exchange has based
this proposed amendment on a very similar provision of the Boston Stock
Exchange's MRP for violation of trade-through rules, which was recently
approved by the Commission.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55606 (April 10,
2007), 72 FR 19221 (April 17, 2007) (approving SR-BSE-2006-11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NYSE Arca Rule 2.23 (employee registration) requires OTP Holders
and Firms to continually disclose to the Exchange through the
registration process personnel who are responsible for trading
decisions on behalf of the OTP Holders or Firms. By requiring such
disclosure, Rule 2.23, like the trade-through rules, substantially
protects the Exchange's ability to regulate its marketplace and help
ensure marketplace integrity. Exchange staff proposes to include the
back-payment of registration fees in addition to a MRP fine so that the
MRP can effectively deter OTP Holders and Firms from trying to save
money and effort by not registering their appropriate personnel, in the
same way that the Boston Stock Exchange's MRP revision in SR-BSE-2006-
11 \4\ deters trade-through violations by requiring the violator to pay
not only the specified fine amount, but also any quantifiable monetary
gain resulting from the violation. Specifically, the Exchange proposes
footnote 3 to enable the Exchange to require violators of Rule 2.23 to
pay not only the specified MRP fine amount, but also to remit all fees
that should have been paid to the Exchange pursuant to compliance with
Rule 2.23.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to the changes proposed to the MRP, the Exchange also
proposes the following related changes.

Rule 9.2(c)--Customer Records

    The Exchange proposes to change Rule 9.2(c) by adding the single
word ``current,'' to clarify and reiterate the obligation that firms
with customer accounts must not only keep records of their customer
accounts, but also keep them current.

Rule 11.1--Adherence to Law and Good Business Practices

    The Exchange proposes to clarify the language of the newly
designated Rule 11.1(a) by substituting the word ``just'' for ``fair.''
    The Exchange also proposes to add a new Rule 11.1(b) that will
require all OTP Holders and Firms, their associated persons, and other
participants to adhere to the principles of good business practice in
the conduct of their business operations. This filing also proposes to
make violations of Rule 11.1(b) eligible for MRP disposition.
    The proposed new Rule 11.1(b) is patterned on the current NYSE Rule
401(a). Like NYSE Rule 401(a), it encompasses miscellaneous conduct
that is inconsistent with the maintenance of a fair and orderly
marketplace or that otherwise violates good business practices without
also showing the bad faith or unethical conduct that have been found to
be essential elements of ``conduct inconsistent with just and equitable
principles of trade,'' as that standard has been clarified in decisions
such as In re. Calvin David Fox.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48731, 81 SEC Docket
1511-31 (October 31, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rule 11.18--Supervision

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 11.18 to remove language that
limits the reach of its supervisory rules. The current language of Rule
11.18(b) provides that only OTP Holders and Firms for whom the Exchange
is the Designated Examining Authority (``DEA'') are subject to its
supervisory requirements. The amendment removes the language limiting
the scope of the rule so that all OTP Holders and Firms, regardless of
DEA, are subject to maintaining systems to supervise activities of
their associated persons and the operations of their business.
    As noted above, this filing also proposes to make minor violations
of Rule 11.18 eligible for disposition through an MRP fine. Exchange
Market Regulation frequently encounters ``minor'' supervisory failures
by OTP Holders and Firms, i.e., supervisory failures whose consequences
have not yet risen to a level justifying formal enforcement action, but
which could have serious consequences if not remedied. By making such
failures eligible for MRP fines, Exchange Market Regulation and
Enforcement will have a greater ability to encourage OTP Holders and
Firms to correct their supervisory problems before they lead to more
serious violations.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\6\ in general, and with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to a free and
open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which NYSE Arca consents, the Commission will:
    A. By order approve such proposed rule change, or
    B. Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2008-49 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2008-49. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of NYSE Arca. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2008-49 and should
be submitted on or before June 13, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-11530 Filed 5-22-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 236 (Thursday, December 8, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76684-76686]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31531]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 281

[EPA-R10-UST-2011-0896; FRL-9502-6]

Idaho: Tentative Approval of State Underground Storage Tank
Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State of Idaho has applied for final approval of its
Underground Storage Tank (UST) Program under Subtitle I of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA has reviewed Idaho's
application and made the tentative decision that the State's UST
program satisfies all requirements necessary to qualify for final
approval.

DATES: A public hearing will be held on December 19, 2011 from 9 a.m.-
12 p.m. at the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, Conference
Room B, 1410 North Hilton, Boise, Idaho 83706. The State of Idaho will
be invited to participate in any public hearing held by EPA on this
subject. Please see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, Item C, for details.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R10-
UST-2011-0896, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments.
     Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Mail: Erik Sirs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 10, 1435 North Orchard, Boise, ID 83706.

Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R10-UST-2011-
0896. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or email. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identify or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters or any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy.
    Please see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, Item D, for details on the
location of the documents in hard copy form.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erik Sirs, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Idaho Operations Office, 1435 North Orchard, Boise,
ID 83706.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

    Section 9004 of RCRA enables EPA to approve implementation of State
UST programs in lieu of the Federal UST program. Approval is granted
when it has been determined that the State

program: (1) Is no less stringent than the overall Federal program and
includes the notification requirements of Section 9004(a)(8), 42 U.S.C.
6991c(a)(8), and (2) provides for adequate enforcement of compliance
with UST standards of Section 9004(a), 42 U.S.C. 6991c(a).

B. State of Idaho

    The Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ) is the lead
implementing agency for the UST program in Idaho. IDEQ has broad
statutory authority to regulate UST releases under Idaho Code, Title
39, Chapter 1, Environmental Quality--Health; Title 39, Chapter 72,
Idaho Land Remediation Act; Chapter 88, Idaho Underground Storage Tank
Act; and the Idaho Rules for Civil Procedure. Specific authorities to
regulate the installation, operation, maintenance, and closure of USTs
is found under the Idaho Administrative Procedures Act 58.01.02 Water
Quality Standards; 58.01.07 Rules Regulating Underground Storage Tank
Systems; 58.01.18 Idaho Land Remediation Rules; 58.01.23 Rules of
Administrative Procedure Before the Board of Environmental Quality;
58.01.24 Standards and Procedure for Application of Risk Based
Corrective Action at Petroleum Release Sites.
    Idaho is not authorized to carry out its UST program in Indian
Country. This includes all lands within the exterior boundaries of the
Coeur d'Alene, Duck Valley, Fort Hall, Kootenai, and Nez Perce
Reservations; any land held in trust by the United States for an Indian
Tribe, and any other lands that are Indian Country within the meaning
of 18 U.S.C. 1151.

C. Public Hearing

    It is EPA's policy to make reasonable accommodation to persons with
disabilities wishing to participate in the Agency's programs and
activities, pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 791,
et seq. Any request for accommodation should be made to Erik Sirs,
(208) 378-5762, preferably a minimum of two weeks in advance of the
public hearing date, so that EPA will have sufficient time to process
the request.
    Please bring this notice to the attention of any persons known by
you to have an interest in this determination.

D. Location of Documents

    All documents that are in the electronic docket are also available
in hard copy during normal business hours at the following locations:

    1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Idaho Operation Office,
Region 10, 1435 North Orchard, Boise, ID 83706 from 9 a.m. to 12
p.m. and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    2. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, 1410 North Hilton,
Boise, ID 83706 from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    3. IDEQ Boise Regional Office, 1445 North Orchard, Boise, ID
83706 from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    4. IDEQ Coeur d'Alene Regional Office, 2110 Ironwood Parkway,
Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. to 4
p.m.; and
    5. IDEQ Idaho Falls Regional Office, 900 N. Skyline, Suite B,
Idaho Falls, ID 83402 from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.;
and
    6. IDEQ Lewiston Regional Office, 1118 ``F'' Street, Lewiston,
ID 83501 from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.; and
    7. IDEQ Pocatello Regional Office, 444 Hospital Way,
300, Pocatello, ID 83201, from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 1
p.m. to 4 p.m.; and
    8. IDEQ Twin Falls Regional Office, 1363 Fillmore Street, Twin
Falls, ID 83301, from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.

E. Statutory and Executive Order (EO) Review

    This proposed rule only applies to Idaho's UST Program requirements
pursuant to RCRA Section 9004 and imposes no requirements other than
those imposed by State law. It complies with applicable EOs and
statutory provisions as follows:

1. Executive Order 12866

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this rule
from its review under Executive Order 12866.

2. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This proposed action does not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq., because this proposed rule does not establish or modify
any information or recordkeeping requirements for the regulated
community and only seeks to authorize the pre-existing requirements
under State law and imposes no additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing, and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to
a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review
the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in Title 40 of the CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.

3. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires Federal
agencies to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule
subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency
certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small
businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.
For purposes of assessing the impacts of today's proposed rule on small
entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business defined by
the Small Business Administration's size regulations at 13 CFR part
121.201; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of
a city, county, town, school district, or special district with a
population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is
any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated
and is not dominant in its field. I certify that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities because the proposed rule will only have the effect of
authorizing pre-existing requirements under State law and imposes no
additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. EPA
continues to be interested in the potential impacts of the proposed
rule on small entities and welcomes comments on issues related to such
impacts.

4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    This proposed rule does not have any impacts as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act because this rule codifies pre-existing
requirements under State law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required by State law. It does not contain
any unfunded mandates or significantly or uniquely affects small
governments.

5. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This proposed rule does not have Federalism implications. It will
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the

national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among various levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This rule
proposes to authorize pre-existing State rules. Thus, Executive Order
13132 does not apply to this proposed rule. In the spirit of Executive
Order 13132, and consistent with EPA policy to promote communications
between EPA and State and local governments, EPA specifically solicits
comment on this proposed rule from State and local officials.

6. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (59 FR 22951, November 9, 2000),
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by Tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have Tribal implications.'' This proposed rule does not
have Tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175 because
EPA retains its authority over Indian Country. Thus, Executive Order
13175 does not apply to this proposed rule. EPA specifically solicits
additional comment on this proposed rule from Tribal officials.

7. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks

    EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997)
as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern health or
safety risks, such that the analysis required under section 5-501 of
the Executive Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This
action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it proposes to
approve a state program.

8. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it
is not a ``significant regulatory action'' as defined under Executive
Order 12866.

9. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Public Law 104-113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272),
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling
procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by
voluntary consensus bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA to provide Congress,
through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides not to use available
and applicable voluntary consensus standards. This proposed rulemaking
does not involve technical standards. Therefore, EPA is not considering
the use of any voluntary consensus standards.

10. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income Populations

    Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes
Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States. EPA has determined that this proposed
rule will not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or
environmental effects on minority or low-income populations. This
proposed rule does not affect the level of protection provided to human
health or the environment because this rule proposes to authorize pre-
existing State rules which are no less stringent than existing Federal
requirements.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 281

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Hazardous materials, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Authority: This notice is issued under the authority of Sections
2002(a), 7004(b), and 9004 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6974(b), and 6991c.

    Dated: November 30, 2011.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2011-31531 Filed 12-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: October 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 199)]
[Notices]
[Page 63452]
[DOCID:fr15oc10-52]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR11-57-001]

Lobo Pipeline Company L.P.; Notice of Baseline Filing

October 7, 2010.
    Take notice that on October 1, 2010, Lobo Pipeline Company L.P.
submitted a revised baseline filing of its Statement of Operating
Conditions for services provided under Section 311 of the Natural Gas
Policy Act of 1978 (``NGPA'').
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken,
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern time on Wednesday, October 20, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25963 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: April 27, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 80)]
[Notices]
[Page 22174-22175]
[DOCID:fr27ap10-107]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Petition To Modify an Exemption of a Previously Approved
Antitheft Device; Porsche

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Grant of a petition to modify an exemption of a previously
approved antitheft device.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 20, 2009, the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) granted in full Porsche Cars North America's
(Porsche) petition for an exemption in accordance with Sec.
543.9(c)(2) of 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from the Theft Prevention
Standard for the Porsche Panamera vehicle line beginning with model
year (MY 2010). On February 4, 2010, Porsche submitted a petition to
modify its previously approved exemption for the Porsche Panamera
vehicle line beginning with model year (MY) 2012. NHTSA is granting
Porsche's petition to modify the exemption in full because it has
determined that the modified device is also likely to be as effective
in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.

DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
model year (MY) 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carlita Ballard, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Standards, NHTSA, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard's telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Her fax number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 20, 2009, NHTSA published in the
Federal Register a notice granting in full a petition from Porsche for
an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR 541) for the Panamera vehicle line
beginning with its MY 2010 vehicles. The Porsche Panamera is equipped
with a passive antitheft device (see 74 FR 10837) and an audible and
visible alarm.
    On February 4, 2010, Porsche submitted a petition to modify the
previously approved exemption for the Panamera vehicle line. This
notice grants in full Porsche's petition to modify the exemption for
the Panamera vehicle line. Porsche's submission is a complete petition,
as required by 49

CFR 543.9(d), in that it meets the general requirements contained in 49
CFR 543.5 and the specific content requirements of 49 CFR 543.6.
Porsche's petition provides a detailed description and diagram of the
identity, design, and location of the components of the antitheft
device proposed for installation beginning with the 2012 model year.
    The MY 2010 passive antitheft device installed on the Porsche
Panamera includes a microprocessor-based immobilizer system, electronic
ignition switch, transponder key, remote control unit, alarm/central
locking control unit, optional keyless entry system and electronic
parking brake. Porsche stated that the central locking system works in
conjunction with the audible and visible alarm. Locking the doors with
the ignition key, the remote control or a door switch (with the keyless
entry option) will activate the audible and visible alarm. An
ultrasonic sensor in the alarm system will monitor the doors, rear
luggage compartment, front deck lid, fuel filler door, and interior
movement. The horn will sound and the lights will flash if there is any
detection of unauthorized use. Porsche stated that its immobilizer
prevents the engine management system and steering system from
functioning when the system is engaged. The immobilizer is
automatically activated when the key is removed from the ignition
switch assembly, or the optional special keyless entry keycard exits
the vehicle with the driver. The immobilizer then returns to its normal
``off'' state, where engine starting, operation, and steering are
inhibited. Starting the engine and operation of the vehicle will be
allowed only when the correct code is sent to the control unit by using
the correct key in the ignition switch, or by having the correct
keyless entry keycard within the occupant compartment of the car. The
ignition key contains a radio signal transponder which signals the
control unit to allow steering and the engine to start. With the
keyless entry system, operation of the vehicle is allowed when the
ignition key is substituted with the special keycard that contains a
radio signal transmitter similar to the transponder in the standard
ignition key.
    Porsche also stated that the Panamera line is equipped with an
electronic steering column lock and an electronically activated parking
brake which is integrated into the vehicle's antitheft device. If the
control unit does not receive the correct code from the ignition key or
keycard, the parking brake will remain activated and the vehicle cannot
be towed.
    In its 2012 modification, Porsche stated that it proposes to delete
the electronic steering column lock equipped on the exempted vehicle
line because the steering column lock is considered redundant by the
electronic parking brake that is standard equipment on the line.
Porsche proposes to delete the electronic steering lock feature
beginning with its MY 2012 vehicles. Porsche stated that its 2012
modified antitheft system will now consist of a microprocessor based
immobilizer system which prevents functioning of the engine management
system, an activated parking brake system, central locking and an alarm
system.
    Porsche also stated that with its 2012 modification, the normal
state of the applicable control unit is to not allow engine starting or
release of the activated parking brake. Only by insertion of the
correct key into the ignition switch, or by having the special keyless
entry keyfob/device with the occupant compartment of the car is the
correct signal sent to the applicable control units, allowing the
engine to start and activation of the parking brake to be released.
Porsche stated that when the key is removed from the ignition, or the
ignition switch/control unit is turned to the ignition lock position
and the keyfob exits the vehicle with the driver, the device will
return to its normal ``off'' state, preventing the engine from starting
and the parking brake from being released.
    Porsche stated that it believes that the planned deletion of the
electronic steering column lock from its comprehensive device for the
Panamera vehicle line will continue to be as effective as parts-marking
and should continue to qualify for an exemption from parts-marking.
Since the same aspects of performance (i.e., arming of the device and
the immobilization feature) are still provided, the agency believes
that the same level of protection is being met. The agency agrees that
the deletion of the electronic steering column lock feature should have
no effect on functionality of the device's ability to deter theft.
Since the agency granted Porsche's exemption for its MY 2010 Panamera
vehicle line, there has been no available theft rate data published by
the agency for the vehicle line.
    The agency has evaluated Porsche's MY 2012 petition to modify the
exemption for the Panamera vehicle line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR part 541, and has decided to grant it. The
agency believes that the proposed device will continue to provide the
five types of performance listed in Sec.  543.6(a)(3): Promoting
activation; attracting attention to the efforts of unauthorized persons
to enter or operate a vehicle by means other than a key; preventing
defeat or circumvention of the device by unauthorized persons;
preventing operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants; and
ensuring the reliability and durability of the device.
    If Porsche decides not to use the exemption for this line, it
should formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line
must be fully marked according to the requirements under 49 CFR 541.5
and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts).
    NHTSA suggests that if the manufacturer contemplates making any
changes, the effects of which might be characterized as de minimis, it
should consult the agency before preparing and submitting a petition to
modify.

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of authority at 49 CFR
1.50.

    Issued on: April 22, 2010.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2010-9704 Filed 4-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register: October 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 196)]
[Notices]
[Page 58994]
[DOCID:fr08oc08-101]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 58723]

Order Extending Emergency Order Pursuant to Section 12(K)(2) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Taking Temporary Action To Respond
to Market Developments

October 2, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 12(k)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Exchange Act''),\1\ on September 18, 2008, the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') issued an Emergency Order (the
``Order'') that prohibited persons from selling short the securities of
financial institutions. The Order became effective at 12:01 a.m. E.D.T.
on September 19, 2008 and is currently set to terminate at 11:59 p.m.
E.D.T. on October 2, 2008.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(k)(2).
    \2\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58592 (Sept. 18,
2008); see also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58611 (Sept. 21,
2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to our authority under Section 12(k)(2)(C) of the Exchange
Act, we are extending the Order. Section 12(k)(2)(C) authorizes the
Commission to extend an emergency order issued pursuant to Section
12(k)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act for a total effective period of up to
30 calendar days, if the Commission finds that the emergency still
exists and determines that an extension is necessary in the public
interest and for the protection of investors to maintain fair and
orderly securities markets.
    We have carefully reevaluated the current state of the markets and
we remain concerned about the potential for sudden and excessive
fluctuations of securities prices generally and disruption in the
functioning of the securities markets that could threaten fair and
orderly markets. We intend the prohibition to restore investor and
market confidence by preventing short selling from being used to drive
down the prices of securities in financial institutions even where
there is no fundamental basis for a price decline other than general
market conditions. Thus, we have determined in this environment that
the standards under Section 12(k)(2) for extending the Order have been
met. Accordingly, we have determined that extending the Order is in the
public interest and necessary to maintain fair and orderly securities
markets and for the protection of investors.
    It is therefore ordered that, pursuant to Section 12(k)(2)(C) of
the Exchange Act, the Order is extended such that it will terminate at
the earlier of (i) three business days from the President's signing of
the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (H.R. 1424), or (ii)
11:59 p.m. E.D.T. on Friday, October 17, 2008.

    By the Commission.
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-23862 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<META name="generator" content="Microsoft Word - Letter Authorizing EPA remove homeowner and comment period waiver Revised Again.doc">
<META name="creation-date" content="28/10/2009 04:10:41 ">
<TITLE>Microsoft Word - Letter Authorizing EPA remove homeowner and comment period waiver Revised Again.doc</TITLE>

October 27, 2009
Document Processing Desk
Office of Pesticide Programs (7504C)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1801 South Bell Street
Arlington, VA 22202-4501
ATTN:
Mary Waller, PM Team# 21   Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>
Fungicide Branch
RE:
Fenarimol Registrations
Riverdale Patchwork, EPA Reg. No. 10163-290
Rubigan AS Turf & Ornamental, EPA Reg. No. 10163-274
Fenarimol Technical, EPA Reg. No. 10163-302
Rubigan Technical, EPA Reg. No. 10163-276
Dear Ms. Waller:
Gowan Company agrees to remove all turf uses from our fenarimol registrations except for turf
on golf course greens, tees and fairways and turf in professional athletic stadia.  We also request
a waiver of the 6-month comment period.
If I can provide you with any further information or documentation please contact me either by
e-mail at <FONT STYLE="font-size<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Regards,

Julie Butcher
Senior Registration Specialist


[Federal Register: January 8, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 4)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 724-725]
[DOCID:fr08ja07-26]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 60

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0699; FRL-8266-9]
RIN 2060-AN71

Standards of Performance for Equipment Leaks of VOC in the
Synthetic Organic Chemicals Manufacturing Industry; Standards of
Performance for Equipment Leaks of VOC in Petroleum Refineries

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is announcing that the comment period on the proposed rule
amendments for the Standards of Performance for Equipment Leaks of VOC
in the Synthetic Organic Chemicals Manufacturing Industry; Standards of
Performance for Equipment Leaks of VOC in Petroleum Refineries,
published on November 7, 2006, is being extended until February 8,
2007.

DATES: Comments. Comments on the proposed amendments published on
November 7, 2006 (71 FR 65302) must be received on or before February
8, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2006-0699, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for

submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Postal Service, send comments to: Air and
Radiation Docket (6102T), Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0699,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. Please include a total of two copies. In
addition, please mail a copy of your comments on the information
collection provisions to the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Attn: Desk Officer for
EPA, 725 17th St., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
     Hand Delivery: In person or by courier, deliver comments
to: Air and Radiation Docket (6102T), EPA West, Room B-102, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20004. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. Please
include a total of two copies.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2006-0699. The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov

or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access''

system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an

e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured

and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket, visit
the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm
.

    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the Federal
Docket Management System index at http://www.regulations.gov. Although listed

in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air and Radiation

Docket, EPA West, Room B-102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the
Air and Radiation Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Note: The EPA Docket Center suffered damage due to flooding
during the last week of June 2006. The Docket Center is continuing
to operate. However, during the cleanup, there will be temporary
changes to Docket Center telephone numbers, addresses, and hours of
operation for people who wish to make hand deliveries or visit the
Public Reading Room to view documents. Consult EPA's Federal
Register notice at 71 FR 38147 (July 5, 2006) or the EPA Web site at
http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm for current information on docket

operations, locations, and telephone numbers. The Docket Center's
mailing address for U.S. mail and the procedure for submitting
comments to http://www.regulations.gov are not affected by the flooding and

will remain the same.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Karen Rackley, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, Sector Policies and Programs Division,
Coatings and Chemicals Group (E143-01), Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number (919) 541-
0634; fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Regulated Entities. Categories and entities potentially regulated
by this action include:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Examples of
           Category                NAICS * Code    potentially regulated
                                                          entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry......................  32411............  Petroleum refiners.
                                Primarily 325110,  Synthetic organic
                                 325192, 325193,    chemicals
                                 and 325199.        manufacturing
                                                    industry (SOCMI)
                                                    units, e.g.,
                                                    producers of
                                                    benzene, toluene, or
                                                    any other chemical
                                                    listed in 40 CFR
                                                    60.489.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* North American Information Classification System.

    This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this
action. To determine whether your facility is regulated by this action,
you should examine the applicability criteria in 40 CFR 60.480 and 40
CFR 60.590. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of
the proposed amendments to a particular entity, contact the person
listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
    Submitting CBI. Do not submit information that you consider to be
CBI electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Send or

deliver information identified as CBI only to the following address:
Roberto Morales, OAQPS Document Control Officer (C404-02), U.S. EPA,
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park,
NC 27711, Attention Docket ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0699. Clearly mark the
part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside
of the disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within
the disk or CD-ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. In addition to one complete
version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy
of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
    If you have any questions about CBI or the procedures for claiming
CBI, please consult the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. Worldwide Web (WWW). In addition to being
available in the docket, an electronic copy of the proposed amendments
is available on the WWW through the Technology Transfer Network (TTN).
Following signature, a copy of the proposed amendments will be posted
on the TTN's policy and guidance page for newly proposed or promulgated
rules at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg. The TTN provides information and

technology exchange in various areas of air pollution control.

Comment Period

    We received several requests to extend the public comment period to
February 8, 2007. We agreed to this request, therefore, the public
comment period will now end on February 8, 2007, rather than January 8,
2007.

How can I get copies of the proposed amendments and other related
information?

    The proposed rule amendments for the Standards of Performance for
Equipment Leaks of VOC in the Synthetic Organic Chemicals Manufacturing
Industry; Standards of Performance for Equipment Leaks of VOC in
Petroleum Refineries, published on November 7, 2006 (71 FR 65302). EPA
has established the official public docket for the proposed rulemaking
under docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0699. Information on how to access
the docket is presented above in the ADDRESSES section.

    Dated: January 3, 2007.
William L. Wehrum,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. E7-20 Filed 1-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 33 (Tuesday, February 19, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4896-4898]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02661]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2018-0140]

Hours of Service of Drivers: Application for Exemption; American
Pyrotechnics Association

ACTION: Notice of final disposition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to grant the American
Pyrotechnics Association (APA) an exemption from the hours-of-service
(HOS) regulations that require a motor carrier to install and require
each of its drivers to use an electronic logging device (ELD) to record
the driver's HOS. APA requested the exemption for APA member companies
currently holding an exemption from the HOS 14-hour rule during the
Independence Day season. These member companies will continue to use
paper records of duty status (RODS) in lieu of an ELD during the
designated Independence Day periods. FMCSA has determined that the
terms and conditions of the exemption ensure a level of safety
equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety achieved without
the exemption.

DATES: The exemption is effective from June 28 through July 8, at 11:59
p.m. local time, in 2019 and 2020.

ADDRESSES:
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to www.regulations.gov at any time or visit Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The on-line Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. If you want
acknowledgment that we received your comments, please include a self-
addressed, stamped envelope or postcard or print the acknowledgement
page that appears after submitting comments on-line.
    Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. LaTonya Mimms, Chief, FMCSA Driver
and Carrier Operations Division; Office of Carrier, Driver and Vehicle
Safety Standards; Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If
you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket,
contact Docket Services, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Public Participation

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to www.regulations.gov and insert
the docket number, ``FMCSA-2018-0140'' in the ``Keyword'' box and click
``Search.'' Next, click ``Open Docket Folder'' button and choose the
document listed to review. If you do not have access to the internet,
you may view the docket online by visiting the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the DOT West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning this
notice, contact Ms. Pearlie Robinson, FMCSA Driver and Carrier
Operations Division; Office of Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety
Standards; Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact
Docket Services, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

II. Legal Basis

    FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to grant
exemptions from certain parts of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations (FMCSRs). FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption
request in the Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must
provide the public an opportunity to inspect the information relevant
to the application, including any safety analyses that have been
conducted. The Agency must also provide an opportunity for public
comment on the request.
    The Agency reviews safety analyses and public comments submitted,
and determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be
achieved by the current regulation (49 CFR 381.305). The decision of
the Agency must be published in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(b)) with the reasons for denying or granting the application
and, if granted, the name of the person or class of persons receiving
the exemption, and the regulatory provision from which the exemption is
granted. The notice must also specify the effective period and explain
the terms and conditions of the exemption. The exemption may be renewed
(49 CFR 381.300(b)).

III. Request for Exemption

    The APA reports that it is a national safety and trade association
of the U.S. fireworks industry, representing manufacturers, importers,
distributors, wholesalers, retailers, suppliers and professional
display companies. APA has over 250 member companies. Along with their
subsidiaries, APA's member companies are responsible for nearly 90
percent of the fireworks manufactured, imported, distributed and
professionally displayed in the United States.
    The Agency published a notice of APA's exemption application on
April 24, 2018 (83 FR17877). APA sought a limited exemption from the
ELD requirements to allow member companies currently holding an
exemption from the 14-hour rule to continue to maintain paper RODs in
lieu of ELDs. Various APA members have held 2-year exemptions during
Independence Day periods from 2005 through 2014. On May 9, 2016, the
current exemption for APA members was extended to July 8, 2020,
pursuant to section 5206(b)(2)(A) of the Fixing America's Surface
Transportation (FAST) Act (81 FR 28115).
    APA asserted that granting this exemption would be appropriate
because there is no basis to believe that continuing to allow paper
record keeping for this limited subset of the regulated community, and
for a limited period of time, would impact operational safety in any
regard. In addition, due to the unique nature of the fireworks
industry, requiring the use of

ELDs for this limited seasonal delivery period would impose a
substantial financial burden on members because it would require them
to purchase/lease ELD systems for use for only a short period every
year.
    APA explained that its members rely upon intermittent casual
drivers periodically throughout the year and particularly during the
busy Independence Day season when the industry depends upon short-term
rental trucks. The fireworks industry is unique in that it rents or
leases approximately 90% of its vehicles throughout the year for less
than 30 days at a time. However, most rental companies require a
minimum rental period of 14 to 21 days, although APA member companies
may only use the trucks in commerce for up to 11 days. The mix of
vehicles rented includes pick-up trucks, cargo vans, city vans and
straight trucks with a GVW of less than 26,000 pounds. The industry
relies heavily upon short-term rental trucks to transport and deliver
98% of the 16,000 Independence Day fireworks displays nationwide. This
exemption would only apply when the carriers designated in the APA HOS
exemption, including revisions, are operating within the specified
Independence Day periods.

IV. Public Comments

    The Agency received 27 comments in response to the application
published on April 24. The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers
Association (OOIDA) and 20 individuals supported the exemption. The
Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety (Advocates) and four individuals
opposed it. One individual took no position on the exemption request.
    OOIDA stated that ``the current ELD marketplace does not adequately
support the needs of the entire trucking industry. Since the December
2017 implementation, professional drivers have shared the real-world
problems they have experienced because of malfunctioning devices, lack
of connectivity in rural areas, and false claims made by ELD vendors.
For these reasons, along with APA's prior exemption history, FMCSA
should grant the exemption request.''
    The Advocates said ``the application does not meet the statutory
and regulatory requirements for the exemption. The application fails to
consider practical alternatives, justify the need for the exemption,
provide an analysis of the safety impacts the requested exemption may
cause, and provide information on the specific countermeasures to be
undertaken to ensure that the exemption will achieve an equivalent or
greater level of safety than would be achieved absent the exemption.''

V. FMCSA Decision

    FMCSA has determined that granting an ELD exemption to APA for a
limited period of 11 days during Independence Day celebrations will
achieve a level of safety equivalent to or greater than the level that
compliance with the ELD rule would ensure. Prior to publishing the
Federal Register notice announcing the receipt of APA's application
request for the exemption, FMCSA ensured that each APA member currently
holding a limited exemption from the 14-hour rule possessed an active
USDOT registration, minimum required levels of insurance, and was not
subject to any ``imminent hazard'' or other out-of-service (OOS)
orders. The Agency conducted a comprehensive investigation of the
safety performance history of each of those motor carriers. As part of
this process, FMCSA reviewed its Motor Carrier Management Information
System safety records, including inspection and accident reports
submitted to FMCSA by State agencies.
    With regard to safety statistics, none of the carriers was under an
imminent hazard or OOS order, had any alerts in the Safety Management
System (SMS), or was under investigation by the Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration. All had ``satisfactory'' safety
ratings based on compliance reviews, and all had valid Hazardous
Materials Safety Permits.

VI. Terms and Conditions of the Exemption

Period of the Exemption

    The exemption from 49 CFR 395.8(a)(1)(i) is effective from June 28
through July 8, at 11:59 p.m. local time, in 2019 and 2020, for the 53
carriers identified in the appendix to this notice.

Terms and Conditions of the Exemption

    This exemption from the ELD provisions in 49 CFR 395.8(a)(1)(i) is
restricted to drivers employed by the APA motor carriers already
covered by the multi-year exemption from the Agency's 14-hour rule
listed in the appendix table of this notice. Drivers covered by the
exemption may continue to use paper logs to record their record of duty
status instead of using an ELD. Motor carriers and drivers must comply
with all other requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations (49 CFR parts 350-399) and Hazardous Materials Regulations
(49 CFR parts 105-180).

Preemption

    In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315(d), as implemented by 49 CFR
381.600, during the period this exemption is in effect, no State shall
enforce any law or regulation applicable to interstate commerce that
conflicts with or is inconsistent with this exemption with respect to a
firm or person operating under the exemption. States may, but are not
required to, adopt the same exemption with respect to operations in
intrastate commerce.

FMCSA Notification

    Exempt motor carriers are required to notify FMCSA within 5
business days of any accidents (as defined by 49 CFR 390.5) involving
their CMVs operating under this exemption. The notification must be by
email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and include the following information:
    a. Name of the Exemption: ``APA ELD''
    b. Date of the accident,
    c. City or town, and State, in which the accident occurred, or
which is closest to the scene of the accident,
    d. Driver's name and driver's license State, number, and class,
    e. Co-Driver's name and driver's license State, number, and class,
    f. Vehicle company number and power unit license plate State and
number,
    g. Number of individuals suffering physical injury,
    h. Number of fatalities,
    i. The police-reported cause of the accident,
    j. Whether the driver was cited for violation of any traffic laws,
or motor carrier safety regulations, and
    k. The total driving time and the total on-duty time of the CMV
driver at the time of the accident.

In addition, if there are any injuries or fatalities, the carrier must
forward the police accident report to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>as soon as
available.

Termination

    The FMCSA does not believe the motor carriers and drivers covered
by this exemption will experience any deterioration of their safety
record. However, should this occur, FMCSA will take all steps necessary
to protect the public interest, including revocation of the exemption.
The FMCSA will immediately revoke the exemption for failure to comply
with its terms and conditions. Exempt motor carriers and

drivers are subject to FMCSA monitoring while operating under this
exemption.

    Issued on: February 8, 2019.
Raymond P. Martinez,
Administrator.

 Appendix to Notice of Application for Approval of Motor Carriers To Utilize American Pyrotechnics Association's
   (APA) Exemption From the ELD Rule in Hours of Service for Drivers Regulations for Independence Day Periods
                                         [June 28 through July 8, 2020]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Motor carrier                     Street address           City, state, zip code        DOT No.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. American Fireworks Company...........  7041 Darrow Road..........  Hudson, OH 44236..........          103972
2. American Fireworks Display, LLC......  P.O. Box 980..............  Oxford, NY 13830..........         2115608
3. AM Pyrotechnics, LLC.................  2429 East 535th Rd........  Buffalo, MO 65622.........         1034961
4. Arthur Rozzi Pyrotechnics............  6607 Red Hawk Ct..........  Maineville, OH 45039......         2008107
5. Artisan Pyrotechnics, Inc............  82 Grace Road.............  Wiggins, MS 39577.........         1898096
6. Atlas PyroVision Entertainment Group,  136 Old Sharon Rd.........  Jaffrey, NH 03452.........          789777
 Inc.
7. Central States Fireworks, Inc........  18034 Kincaid Street......  Athens, IL 62613..........         1022659
8. East Coast Pyrotechnics, Inc.........  4652 Catawba River Rd.....  Catawba, SC 29704.........          545033
9. Entertainment Fireworks, Inc.........  13313 Reeder Road SW......  Tenino, WA 98589..........          680942
10. Falcon Fireworks....................  3411 Courthouse Road......  Guyton, GA 31312..........         1037954
11. Fireworks & Stage FX America........  12650 Hwy 67S., Suite B...  Lakeside, CA 92040........          908304
12. Fireworks by Grucci, Inc............  20 Pinehurst Drive........  Bellport, NY 11713........          324490
13. Flashing Thunder Fireworks dba Legal  700 E Van Buren Street....  Mitchell, IA 50461........          420413
 Aluminum King Mfg.
14. J&J Computing dba Fireworks           174 Route 17 North........  Rochelle Park, NJ 07662...         2064141
 Extravaganza.
15. Gateway Fireworks Displays..........  PO Box 39327..............  St Louis, MO 63139........         1325301
16. Great Lakes Fireworks...............  24805 Marine..............  Eastpointe, MI 48021......         1011216
17. Hamburg Fireworks Display, Inc......  2240 Horns Mill Road SE...  Lancaster, OH.............          395079
18. Hawaii Explosives & Pyrotechnics,     17-7850 N. Kulani Road....  Mountain View, HI 96771...         1375918
 Inc.
19. Hollywood Pyrotechnics, Inc.........  1567 Antler Point.........  Eagan, MN 55122...........         1061068
20. Homeland Fireworks, Inc.............  P.O. Box 7................  Jamieson, OR 97909........         1377525
21. J&M Displays, Inc...................  18064 170th Ave...........  Yarmouth, IA 52660........          377461
22. Lantis Fireworks, Inc...............  130 Sodrac Dr., Box 229...  N. Sioux City, SD 57049...          534052
23. Legion Fireworks Co., Inc...........  10 Legion Lane............  Wappingers Falls, NY 12590          554391
24. Miand Inc. dba Planet Productions     PO Box 294, 3999 Hupp Road  Kingsbury, IN 46345.......          777176
 (Mad Bomber).                             R31.
25. Martin & Ware Inc. dba Pyro City      P.P. Box 322..............  Hallowell, ME 04347.......          734974
 Maine & Central Maine Pyrotechnics.
26. Melrose Pyrotechnics, Inc...........  1 Kingsbury Industrial      Kingsbury, IN 46345.......          434586
                                           Park.
27. Montana Display Fireworks, Inc......  9480 Inspiration Road.....  Missoula, MT 59808........         1030231
28. Precocious Pyrotechnics, Inc........  4420-278th Ave NW.........  Belgrade, MN 56312........          435931
29. Pyro Shows, Inc.....................  115 N 1st Street..........  LaFollette, TN 37766......          456818
30. Pyro Shows of Alabama, Inc..........  3325 Poplar Lane..........  Adamsville, AL 35005 55063         2859710
31. Pyro Shows of Texas, Inc............  6601 9 Mile Azle Rd.......  Fort Worth, TX 76135......         2432196
32. Pyro Engineering Inc., dba/Bay        400 Broadhollow Rd., Ste    Farmingdale, NY 11735.....          530262
 Fireworks.                                #3.
33. Pyro Spectaculars, Inc..............  3196 N Locust Ave.........  Rialto, CA 92376..........          029329
34. Pyro Spectaculars North, Inc........  5301 Lang Avenue..........  McClellan, CA 95652.......         1671438
35. Pyrotechnic Display, Inc............  8450 W. St. Francis Rd....  Frankfort, IL 60423.......         1929883
36. Pyrotecnico (S. Vitale Pyrotechnic    302 Wilson Rd.............  New Castle, PA 16105......          526749
 Industries, Inc.).
37. Pyrotecnico FX......................  6965 Speedway Blvd. Suite   Las Vegas, NV 89115.......         1610728
                                           115.
38. Rainbow Fireworks, Inc..............  76 Plum Ave...............  Inman, KS 67546...........         1139643
39. RES Specialty Pyrotechnics..........  21595 286th St............  Belle Plaine, MN 56011....          523981
40. Rozzi's Famous Fireworks, Inc.......  11605 North Lebanon Rd....  Loveland, OH 45140........         0483686
41. Sky Wonder Pyrotechnics, LLC........  3626 CR 203...............  Liverpool, TX 77577.......         1324580
42. Skyworks, Ltd.......................  13513 W. Carrier Rd.......  Carrier, OK 73727.........         1421047
43. Sorgi American Fireworks Michigan,    935 Wales Ridge Rd........  Wales, MI 48027...........         2475727
 LLC.
44. Spielbauer Fireworks Co, Inc........  220 Roselawn Blvd.........  Green Bay, WI 54301.......          046479
45. Spirit of 76........................  6401 West Hwy 40..........  Columbia, MO 65202........         2138948
46. Starfire Corporation................  682 Cole Road.............  Carrolltown, PA 15722.....          554645
47. Vermont Fireworks Co., Inc./          2235 Vermont Route 14       East Montpelier, VT 05651.          310632
 Northstar Fireworks Co., Inc.             South.
48. Western Display Fireworks, Ltd......  10946 S. New Era Rd.......  Canby, OR 97013...........          498941
49. Western Enterprises, Inc............  PO Box 160................  Carrier, OK 73727.........          203517
50. Wolverine Fireworks Display, Inc....  205 W Seidlers............  Kawkawlin, MI.............          376857
51. Young Explosives Corp...............  P.O. Box 18653............  Rochester, NY 14618.......          450304
52. Zambelli Fireworks MFG, Co., Inc....  PO Box 1463...............  New Castle, PA 16103......          033167
53. ZY Pyrotechnics, LLC dba Skyshooter   1014 Slocum Road..........  Wapwallopen, PA 18660.....         1030231
 Displays, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2019-02661 Filed 2-15-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62511-62512]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24673]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2014-97]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to
improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of
FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the
inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to
affect the legal status of the petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before November 6, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by Docket Number FAA-2014-
0786 using any of the following methods:
     Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to the Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
     Fax: Fax comments to the Docket Management Facility at
202-493-2251.
     Hand Delivery: Bring comments to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Privacy: We will post all comments we receive, without change, to
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. Using the search function of our docket Web site, anyone can
find and read the comments received into any of our dockets, including
the name of the individual sending the comment (or signing the comment
for an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
    Docket: To read background documents or comments received, go to

http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nia Daniels<PHONE_NUMBER>, Office of
Rulemaking, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 8, 2014.
Lirio Liu,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2014-0786.
    Petitioner: Alan Purwin.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 61.113(a) and (b), 91.103, 91.119,
91.121, 91.151(a), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a)
and (b).
    Description of Relief Sought: Alan D. Purwin, an operator of
unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) for aerial photography for the motion
picture and television, hereby applies for an exemption to allow
commercial operation of his UASs.

[FR Doc. 2014-24673 Filed 10-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P