[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 87 (Friday, May 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24613-24614]
[FR Doc No: 2021-09637]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0715; FRL-10023-75-OMS]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; Tolerance Petitions for Pesticides on Food
or Feed Crops and New Food Use Inert Ingredients (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), Tolerance Petitions for
Pesticides on Food or Feed Crops and New Food Use Inert Ingredients
(EPA ICR Number 0597.13, OMB Control Number 2070-0024) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act. This is a proposed extension of the ICR,
which is currently approved through April 30, 2022. Public comments
were previously requested via the Federal Register on August 17, 2020
during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30
days for public comments. A fuller description of the ICR is given
below, including its estimated burden and cost to the public. An Agency
may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before June 7, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments to EPA, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-
HQ-OPP-2015-0715, online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection
Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
    Submit written comments and recommendations to OMB for the proposed
information collection within 30 days of publication of this notice to
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information
collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--Open for
Public

Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carolyn Siu, Mission Support Division
(7101M), Office of Program Support, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:
(703) 347-0159; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available
in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: The use of pesticides to increase crop production often
results in pesticide residues in or on the crop. To protect public
health from unsafe pesticide residues, EPA sets limits on the nature
and level of residues permitted pursuant to section 408 of the Federal
Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). A pesticide may not be used on
food or feed crops unless the Agency has established a tolerance
(maximum residue limit) for the pesticide residues on that crop or
established an exemption from the requirement to have a tolerance.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Individuals or entities engaged in
activities related to the registration of a pesticide product and
establishments primarily engaged in administrative management and
general management consulting services.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (FIFRA Section 408).
    Estimated number of respondents: 165 (total).
    Frequency of response: On Occasion.
    Total estimated burden: 285,128 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated costs: $27,475,223 (per year), includes $0
annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the estimates: There is no change in the number of hours
in the total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR
currently approved by OMB.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2021-09637 Filed 5-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 97 (Monday, May 22, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 23143]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10422]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2017-0370]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Sacramento River, Sacramento, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of deviation from drawbridge regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a temporary deviation from the
operating schedule that governs the Tower Drawbridge across the
Sacramento River, mile 59.0 at Sacramento, CA. The deviation is
necessary to allow the community to participate in a Girl Scouts
Ceremony event. This deviation allows the bridge to remain in the
closed-to-navigation position during the deviation period.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. on June 3,
2017.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this deviation, [USCG-2017-0370], is
available at http://www.regulations.gov. Type the docket number in the
``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the
line associated with this deviation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary deviation, call or email Carl T. Hausner, Chief, Bridge
Section, Eleventh Coast Guard District; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: California Department of Transportation has
requested a temporary change to the operation of the Tower Drawbridge,
mile 59.0, over Sacramento River, at Sacramento, CA. The drawbridge
navigation span provides a vertical clearance of 30 feet above Mean
High Water in the closed-to-navigation position. The draw operates as
required by 33 CFR 117.189(a). Navigation on the waterway is commercial
and recreational.
    The drawspan will be secured in the closed-to-navigation position
from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. on June 3, 2017, to allow the community to
participate in a Girl Scouts Ceremony event. This temporary deviation
has been coordinated with the waterway users. No objections to the
proposed temporary deviation were raised.
    Vessels able to pass through the bridge in the closed position may
do so at anytime. The bridge will be able to open for emergencies and
there is no immediate alternate route for vessels to pass. The Coast
Guard will also inform the users of the waterway, through our Local and
Broadcast Notices to Mariners, of the change in operating schedule for
the bridge so that vessel operators can arrange their transits to
minimize any impact caused by the temporary deviation.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the effective
period of this temporary deviation. This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: May 17, 2017.
C.T. Hausner,
District Bridge Chief, Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2017-10422 Filed 5-19-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: October 2, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 190)]
[Notices]
[Page 56107-56108]
[DOCID:fr02oc07-82]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request Upon Written Request, Copies
Available From: Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 20549-0213

Extension: Regulation C; OMB Control No. 3235-0074; SEC File No.
270-68.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management Budget
for extension and approval.
    Regulation C (17 CFR 230.400 through 230.498) provides standard
instructions to guide persons when filing registration statements under
the Securities Act of 1933(15 U.S.C. 77a, et seq.). The information
collected is intended to ensure the adequacy of information available
to investors in the registration of securities. Regulation C is
assigned one burden hour for administrative convenience because the
regulation simply prescribes the disclosure that must appear in other
filings under the federal securities laws.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether these proposed
collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of

information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to R. Corey Booth, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O
Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312;
or send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: September 26, 2007.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-19408 Filed 10-1-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


MEMORANDUM

To:	File

From:	Michael Galbraith, USEPA/OSWER/OSW/HWMMD

Date:	8/7/08

Re:	Meeting With Portland Cement Association (PCA)

On August 7, 2008 EPA met with members of the PCA.  Attendees are listed
in the attached sign-in sheet.

PCA described their organization and presented their views on how best
to determine which materials are fuels, and not solid wastes under RCRA,
for purposes of determining applicability of relevant CAA 112 and 129
standards.   The meeting also served in part as an introductory meeting
because EPA was adding some additional new staff to work on this
project.

PCA used, as a basis for their discussion, two documents that are also
attached.

Attachments


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 236 (Monday, December 10, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63403-63405]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26501]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0698; Airspace Docket No. 18-AGL-20]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of Class D Airspace; Pontiac, MI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action modifies Class D airspace at Oakland County
International Airport, Pontiac, MI, due to the decommissioning of the
Pontiac VHF omnidirectional range (VOR) navigation aid, which provided
navigation information for the instrument procedures at this airport,
as part of the VOR Minimum Operational Network (MON) Program. This
action also replaces the outdated term Airport/Facility Directory with
Chart Supplement. Airspace redesign is necessary for the safety and
management of instrument flight rules (IFR) operations at this airport.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, February 28, 2019. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
Title 1 Code of Federal Regulations part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order

7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11C at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends Class D airspace at Oakland County International Airport,
Pontiac, MI, to support IFR operations at this airport.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (83 FR 47578; September 20, 2018) for Docket No. FAA-2018-0698
to amend Class D airspace at Oakland County International Airport,
Pontiac, MI. Interested parties were invited to participate in this
rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the
FAA. No comments were received.
    Subsequent to publication, the FAA discovered that the extension
from the Oakland County Intl: RWY 09R-LOC was contained within the
radius of the airport and is thus not required in the airspace legal
description. That extension and the Oakland County Intl: RWY 09R-LOC
are removed from the airspace legal description in this rule.
    Class D airspace designations are published in paragraph 5000 of
FAA Order 7400.11C, dated August 13, 2018, and effective September 15,
2018, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 13, 2018, and effective September 15,
2018. FAA Order 7400.11C is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11C lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 modifies the Class D airspace at Oakland County International
Airport, Pontiac, MI, by adding an extension 1 mile each side of the
274[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 4.2-mile radius to
4.4 miles west of the airport.
    This action also makes an editorial change to the airspace legal
description replacing ``Airport/Facility Directory'' with ``Chart
Supplement''.
    The extension from the Oakland County Intl: RWY 09R-LOC and the
Oakland County Intl: RWY 09R-LOC are removed from the airspace legal
description. Except for this change, this rule is the same as published
in the NPRM.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5.a. This airspace action is not expected
to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11C,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 13, 2018, and
effective September 15, 2018, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

AGL MI D Pontiac, MI [Amended]

Oakland County International Airport, MI
    (Lat. 42[deg]39'56'' N, long. 83[deg]25'14'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
3,500 feet MSL within a 4.2-mile radius of Oakland County
International Airport, and within 1 mile each side of the 274[deg]
bearing from the airport extending from the 4.2-mile radius to 4.4
miles west of the airport. This Class D airspace area is effective
during the specific dates and times established in advance by a
Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be
continuously published in the Chart Supplement.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on November 26, 2018.
Walter Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2018-26501 Filed 12-7-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76508-76509]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30718]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63413; File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2010-112]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by NYSE Amex LLC Amending the
Exchange Price List With Respect to Nasdaq Securities Traded Pursuant
to Unlisted Trading Privileges

December 2, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on November 30, 2010, NYSE Amex LLC (``NYSE Amex'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its 2010 Price List for equities to
amend the fees charged for taking liquidity in Nasdaq securities traded
pursuant to unlisted trading privileges and to change the minimum size
requirements for larger displayed orders in trades above $5.00 to
receive the enhanced rebate in lieu of the standard rebate for such
securities. The amended pricing will become operative on December 1,
2010. The text of the proposed rule change is available at the
Exchange's principal office, at http://www.nyse.com, at the
Commission's Public Reference Room, and on the Commission's Web site at
http://www.sec.gov.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its 2010 Price List for equities to
modify the fees charged to market participants, Supplemental Liquidity
Providers (``SLPs'') and Designated Market Makers (``DMMs'') for taking
liquidity in Nasdaq securities traded pursuant to unlisted trading
privileges whose share price is $1.00 or more.
    Currently, market participants, SLPs and DMMs are charged a fee of
$0.0023 per share for orders in Nasdaq securities traded pursuant to
unlisted trading privileges that take liquidity. Under the proposal,
the fee will be changed to $0.0027 per share for orders that take
liquidity.
    In a rule filing on October 1, 2010,\3\ the Exchange adopted a
block rebate of $0.0036 per share for executions of displayed liquidity
to all market participants and SLPs that provide liquidity in orders in
Nasdaq securities traded pursuant to unlisted trading privileges that
originally display a minimum of 5,000 shares with a trading price of at
least $5.00 per share, for as long as the order is not cancelled in
amount that would reduce the original displayed amount below 5,000
shares. The Exchange proposes to reduce these minimum displayed size
requirements from 5,000 shares to 2,000 shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63072 (October 8,
2010), 75 FR 64368 (October 19, 2010) (File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2010-97)
(the ``Block Rebate Filing'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the Block Rebate Filing, the Exchange also adopted a block
rebate for DMMs of $0.0036 per share in Nasdaq securities traded
pursuant to unlisted trading privileges for executions of the displayed
portions of s-Quotes that provide liquidity and display 5,000 shares or
more at the time of execution with a trading price of at least $5.00
per share. The Exchange proposes to reduce this minimum displayed size
requirement from 5,000 shares to 2,000 shares.
    These changes are intended to become operative for all transactions
beginning December 1, 2010.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\4\ in general, and Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\5\ in
particular, in that it is designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its
members and other persons using its facilities. The Exchange believes
that the proposal does not constitute an inequitable allocation of
fees, as all similarly situated member organizations will be charged
the same amount and access to the Exchange's market is offered on fair
and non-discriminatory terms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \6\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-
4 \7\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge
imposed on its members by NYSE Amex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments:

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2010-112 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2010-112. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NYSEAmex-2010-112 and should be submitted on or before December 29,
2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-30718 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 189 (Friday, September 28, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49017-49020]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20920]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0803; Product Identifier 2018-NM-098-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
The Boeing Company Model 727 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted
by a report of cracking in the inboard lower flange and adjacent web
near the forward attachment of the outboard flap track at a certain
position on a Model 737-300 airplane. The flap tracks of Model 737-300
airplanes are similar to the flap tracks of Model 727 airplanes. This
proposed AD would require repetitive detailed inspections and surface
high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections of each outboard flap
track at certain positions for any crack and discrepancy, and
applicable on-condition actions. We are proposing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 13,
2018.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS),
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It
is also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0803.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0803; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Muoi Vuong, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 562-627-
5210; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2018-0803;
Product Identifier 2018-NM-098-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this NPRM because
of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We have received a report indicating cracking in the inboard lower
flange and adjacent web near the forward attachment of the outboard
flap track at position 8, which was found during a tear down of a Model
737-300 airplane. The flap tracks of Model 737-300 airplanes are
similar to the flap tracks of Model 727 airplanes. This condition, if
not addressed, could result in the inability of a principal structural
element to sustain required flight load, which could result in loss of
the outboard trailing edge flap and reduced controllability of the
airplane.

Related Rulemaking

    We have issued AD 2018-18-13, Amendment 39-19392 (83 FR 46380,
September 13, 2018) (``AD 2018-18-13''), for The Boeing Company Model
737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, -500 series airplanes. AD 2018-18-13
requires an inspection to determine the part number of the wing
outboard flap track assembly; repetitive inspections of each affected
wing outboard flap track for discrepancies, and applicable on-condition
actions; and repetitive overhaul of each wing outboard flap track. AD
2018-18-13 addresses cracking of the rear spar attachment, and cracking
of the wing outboard flap tracks. Cracking in the area between the
forward and rear spar attachments of the wing outboard flap tracks
could lead to the inability of a principal structural element to
sustain required flight load, and result in loss of the outboard
trailing edge flap and consequent reduced controllability of the
airplane.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 727-57A0188 RB,
dated May 31, 2018. The service information describes procedures for
repetitive detailed inspections for discrepancies and surface HFEC
inspections for cracks of each outboard flap track at positions 1, 2,
7, and 8, and applicable on-condition actions. On-condition actions
include repairs and installation of a new or serviceable flap track.
This service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishment of the actions
identified in Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 727-57A0188 RB, dated
May 31, 2018, described previously, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
    For information on the procedures and compliance times, see this
service information at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0803.

Explanation of Requirements Bulletin

    The FAA worked in conjunction with industry, under the
Airworthiness Directives Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee
(AD ARC), to enhance the AD system. One enhancement is a process for
annotating which steps in the service information are ``required for
compliance'' (RC) with

an AD. Boeing has implemented this RC concept into Boeing service
bulletins.
    In an effort to further improve the quality of ADs and AD-related
Boeing service information, a joint process improvement initiative was
worked between the FAA and Boeing. The initiative resulted in the
development of a new process in which the service information more
clearly identifies the actions needed to address the unsafe condition
in the ``Accomplishment Instructions.'' The new process results in a
Boeing Requirements Bulletin, which contains only the actions needed to
address the unsafe condition (i.e., only the RC actions).

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 16 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
            Action                   Labor cost         Parts cost      Cost per product          operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections...................  113 work-hours x $85              $0  $9,605 per            $153,680 per
                                 per hour = $9,605                     inspection cycle.     inspection cycle.
                                 per inspection
                                 cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the
Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2018-0803; Product Identifier
2018-NM-098-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by November 13, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 727, 727-100,
727-100C, 727-200, 727-200F, and 727C series airplanes, certificated
in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report of cracking in the inboard
lower flange and adjacent web near the forward attachment of the
outboard flap track at position 8 on a Model 737-300 airplane. The
flap tracks of Model 737-300 airplanes are similar to the flap
tracks of Model 727 airplanes. We are issuing this AD to address the
inability of a principal structural element to sustain required
flight load, which could result in loss of the outboard trailing
edge flap and reduced controllability of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    Except as required by paragraph (h) of this AD: At the
applicable times specified in the ``Compliance'' paragraph of Boeing
Alert Requirements Bulletin 727-57A0188 RB, dated May 31, 2018, do
all applicable actions identified in, and in accordance with, the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin
727-57A0188 RB, dated May 31, 2018.

    Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD:  Guidance for accomplishing
the actions required by this AD can be found in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 727-57A0188, dated May 31, 2018, which is referred to in
Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 727-57A0188 RB, dated May 31,
2018.

(h) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications

    (1) For purposes of determining compliance with the requirements
of this AD: Where Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 727-57A0188 RB,
dated May 31, 2018, uses the phrase ``the original issue date of
Requirements Bulletin 727-57A0188 RB,'' this AD requires using ``the
effective date of this AD.''

    (2) Where Boeing Requirements Bulletin 727-57A0188 RB, dated May
31, 2018, specifies contacting Boeing for repair instructions, this
AD requires repair before further flight using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this
AD.

(i) Parts Installation Limitation

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install, on
any airplane, a wing outboard flap track having a part number listed
in paragraph 1.B. of Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 727-57A0188
RB, dated May 31, 2018, unless the inspections and applicable on-
condition actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 727-57A0188 RB, dated May 31,
2018, are accomplished concurrently with the installation of the
part on the airplane.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. Information
may be emailed to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.

(k) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Muoi Vuong,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-
5205; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on September 14, 2018.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-20920 Filed 9-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68827-68828]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27151]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0315; Airspace Docket No. 18-ANM-3]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Astoria, OR

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend the Class E airspace area,
designated as a surface area, at Astoria Regional Airport, Astoria, OR
by reducing the size of the Class E surface airspace. Also, this action
proposes to amend the Class E airspace by adding two Class E airspace
areas, designated as an extension to a Class D or Class E surface area,
at the airport. Additionally, this action proposes to amend the Class E
airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface
of the earth, by reducing the dimensions of the area and sizing it to
properly contain IFR arrivals and departures. Further, this action
proposes to make several administrative corrections to the airport's
legal descriptions. This action would ensure the safety and management
of IFR operations at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 31, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; telephone:
1-800-647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2019-0315; Airspace Docket No. 18-ANM-3, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at https://www.regulations.com.
    FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11D at NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Van Der Wal, Federal Aviation
Administration, Western Service Center, Operations Support Group, 2200
S 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority,
as it would amend the Class E airspace at Astoria Regional Airport,
Astoria, Oregon to support instrument flight rules (IFR) operations at
the airport.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Persons wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2019-0315;
Airspace Docket No. 18-ANM-3''. The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Center, Operations Support Group, 2200 S 216th Street, Des Moines, WA
98198.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and effective
September 15, 2019. FAA Order 7400.11D is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11D lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by amending the Class E airspace area,
designated as a surface area, at Astoria Regional Airport, Astoria, OR
to properly contain IFR aircraft as follows; That airspace extending
upward from the surface within a 4-mile radius of the airport beginning
at the 350[deg] bearing from the airport clockwise to the 239[deg]
bearing from the airport, thence along the 239[deg] bearing to a 5-
miles radius clockwise to the 350[deg] bearing from the airport, thence

along the 350[deg] bearing to the 4-miles radius of the Astoria
Regional Airport, excluding that airspace within a 1-mile radius of the
Camp Rilea Army Heliport.
    Also, this action proposes to amend the Class E airspace by adding
two Class E airspace areas, designated as an extension to a Class D or
Class E surface area. These areas would properly contain IFR arrivals
descending below 1,000 feet above the surface of the earth as follows;
That airspace extending upward from the surface within 1.1 miles each
side of the 095[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 4-mile
radius to 9.3 miles east of the airport, and within 2.4 miles each side
of the 267[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 5-mile
radius to 7.1 miles west of the Astoria Regional Airport.
    Additionally, this action proposes to amend the Class E airspace
areas extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface of the
earth at the airport. The proposal would reduce the overall dimensions
of the area and properly size it to contain IFR departures and arrivals
as follows; That airspace extending from 700 feet above the surface
within an 8-mile radius of the airport, and within 4 miles each side of
the 095[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 8-mile radius
to 18.8 miles east of the airport, and 4.3 miles north and 7.8 miles
south of the 265[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 8-
mile radius to 16.1 miles west of the Astoria Regional Airport.
    Further, this action proposes to make administrative corrections to
the airport's Class E2 Class E5 legal descriptions. The Class E2
airspace should be full time; the following two sentences do not
accurately represent the time of use for the Class E2 airspace and need
to be removed: ``This Class E airspace area is effective during
specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen.
The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published
in the Airport/Facility Directory.'' The action also proposes to remove
the Seaside Municipal Airport from the Class E5 legal description
because the Class E5 700 foot airspace no longer overlies the Seaside
Municipal Airport.
    Class E2, Class E4 and Class E5 airspace designations are published
in paragraphs 6002, 6004, and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order
7400.11D, dated August 8, 2019, and effective September 15, 2019, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order. FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11D,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and
effective September 15, 2019, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

ANM OR E2 Astoria, OR [Amended]

Astoria Regional Airport, Astoria, OR
    (Lat. 46[deg]09'29'' N, long. 123[deg]52'43'' W)
Camp Rilea Army Heliport
    (Lat. 46[deg]06'59'' N, long. 123[deg]55'54'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within a 4-mile
radius of the airport beginning at the 350[deg] bearing from the
airport clockwise to the 239[deg] bearing from the airport, thence
along the 239[deg] bearing to a 5-miles radius clockwise to the
350[deg] bearing from the airport, thence along the 350[deg] bearing
to the 4-miles radius of the Astoria Regional Airport, excluding
that airspace within a 1-mile radius of the Camp Rilea Army
Heliport.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as an Extension to
a Class D or Class E Surface Area.

* * * * *

ANM OR E4 Astoria, OR [New]

Astoria Regional Airport, Astoria, OR
    (Lat. 46[deg]09'29'' N, long. 123[deg]52'43'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 1.1 miles
each side of the 095[deg] bearing from the airport extending from
the 4-mile radius to 9.3 miles east of the airport, and within 2.4
miles each side of the 267[deg] bearing from the airport extending
from the 5-mile radius to 7.1 miles west of the Astoria Regional
Airport.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ANM OR E5 Astoria, OR [Amended]

Astoria Regional Airport, Astoria, OR
    (Lat. 46[deg]09'29'' N, long. 123[deg]52'43'' W)

    That airspace extending from 700 feet above the surface within
an 8-mile radius of the airport, and within 4 miles each side of the
095[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 8-mile radius
to 18.8 miles east of the airport, and 4.3 miles north and 7.8 miles
south of the 265[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 8-
mile radius to 16.1 miles west of the Astoria Regional Airport.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on December 11, 2019.
Tom Clark,
Group Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2019-27151 Filed 12-16-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P