[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 18, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57383-57385]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22745]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-ORD-2013-0626; FRL-9900-98-ORD]

Human Studies Review Board; Notification of a Public Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA Office of the Science Advisor announces a public
meeting of the Human Studies Review Board to advise the Agency on the
EPA scientific and ethical reviews of research with human subjects.

DATES: This public meeting will be held on October 1, 2013, from
approximately 12:30 p.m. to approximately 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time.
Comments may be submitted on or before noon (Eastern Time) on Thursday,
September 24, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit your written comments, identified by Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-ORD-2013-0626, by one of the following methods:
    Internet: http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
    Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Mail: The EPA Docket Center EPA/DC, ORD Docket, Mail code: 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    Hand Delivery: The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is located in the EPA
Headquarters Library, Room Number 3334 in the EPA WJC West, at 1301
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460. The hours of operation
are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday,
excluding federal holidays. Please call<PHONE_NUMBER> or email the ORD
Docket at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for instructions. Updates to Public
Reading Room access are available on the Web site http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-ORD-
2013-0626. The Agency's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or email. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email comment directly to the EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with
any electronic storage media you submit. If the EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, the EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form

of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any member of the public who wishes to
receive further information should contact Jim Downing at telephone
number<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Lu-Ann Kleibacker on telephone number (202) 564-
7189; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
mailing address Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the Science
Advisor, Mail code 8105R, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20460. General information concerning the EPA HSRB can be found on the
EPA Web site at http://www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Location: The meeting will be held at the EPA Conference Center--S-
4380, One Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive,
Arlington, VA 22202.
    Meeting access: Seating at the meeting will be on a first-come
basis. To request accommodation of a disability, please contact the
persons listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT at least ten
business days prior to the meeting using the information under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, so that appropriate arrangements can be
made.
    Procedures for providing public input: Interested members of the
public may submit relevant written or oral comments for the HSRB to
consider during the advisory process. Additional information concerning
submission of relevant written or oral comments is provided in Section
I, ``Public Meeting'' under subsection D. ``How May I Participate in
this Meeting?'' of this notice.

I. Public Meeting

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. This Notice may,
however, be of particular interest to persons who conduct or assess
human studies, especially studies on substances regulated by the EPA,
or to persons who are, or may be required to conduct testing of
chemical substances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or
the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. This notice
might also be of special interest to participants of studies involving
human subjects, or representatives of study participants or experts on
community engagement. Since many entities may also be interested, the
Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may
be affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult Jim
Downing or Lu-Ann Kleibacker listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

B. How can I access electronic copies of this document and other
related information?

    In addition to using regulations.gov, you may access this Federal
Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the
``Federal Register'' listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the ORD Docket, EPA/
DC, Public Reading Room. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is located in
the EPA Headquarters Library, Room Number 3334 in the EPA WJC West, at
1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460. The hours of
operation are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through
Friday, excluding federal holidays. Please call<PHONE_NUMBER> or email
the ORD Docket at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for instructions. Updates to
Public Reading Room access are available on the Web site (http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm). The Agency's position paper(s),
charge/questions to the HSRB, and the meeting agenda will be available
by the last week of September 2013. In addition, the Agency may provide
additional background documents as the materials become available. You
may obtain electronic copies of these documents, and certain other
related documents that might be available electronically, from the
regulations.gov Web site and the EPA HSRB Web site at http://www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/. For questions on document availability, or if
you do not have access to the Internet, consult either Jim Downing or
Lu-Ann Kleibacker listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?

    You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
    1. Explain your views as clearly as possible.
    2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
    3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data that you
used to support your views.
    4. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    5. To ensure proper receipt by the EPA, be sure to identify the
Docket ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the
first page of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and
Federal Register citation.

D. How may I participate in this meeting?

    You may participate in this meeting by following the instructions
in this section. To ensure proper receipt by the EPA, it is imperative
that you identify Docket ID number EPA-HQ-ORD-2013-0626 in the subject
line on the first page of your request.
    1. Oral comments. Requests to present oral comments will be
accepted up to Tuesday, September 24, 2013. To the extent that time
permits, interested persons who have not pre-registered may be
permitted by the Chair of the HSRB to present oral comments at the
meeting. Each individual or group wishing to make brief oral comments
to the HSRB is strongly advised to submit their request (preferably via
email) to Jim Downing or Lu-Ann Kleibacker, under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT no later than noon, Eastern Time, Tuesday,
September 24, 2013, in order to be included on the meeting agenda and
to provide sufficient time for the HSRB Chair and HSRB Designated
Federal Official to review the meeting agenda to provide an appropriate
public comment period. The request should identify the name of the
individual making the presentation and the organization (if any) the
individual will represent. Oral comments before the HSRB are generally
limited to five minutes per individual or organization. Please note
that this includes all individuals appearing either as part of, or on
behalf of, an organization. While it is our intent to hear a full range
of oral comments on the science and ethics issues under discussion, it
is not our intent to permit organizations to expand the time
limitations by having numerous individuals sign up separately to speak
on their behalf. If additional time is available, further public
comments may be possible.
    2. Written comments. Submit your written comments prior to the
meeting. For the Board to have the best opportunity to review and
consider your

comments as it deliberates on its report, you should submit your
comments at least five business days prior to the beginning of this
meeting. If you submit comments after this date, those comments will be
provided to the Board members, but you should recognize that the HSRB
members may not have adequate time to consider those comments prior to
making a decision. Thus, if you plan to submit written comments, the
agency strongly encourages you to submit such comments no later than
noon, Eastern Time, Tuesday, September 24, 2013. You should submit your
comments using the instructions in Section I., under subsection C.,
``What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for the EPA?'' In
addition, the agency also requests that persons submitting comments
directly to the docket also provide a copy of their comments to Jim
Downing or Lu-Ann Kleibacker listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. There is no limit on the length of written comments for
consideration by the HSRB.

E. Background

    The HSRB is a Federal advisory committee operating in accordance
with the Federal Advisory Committee Act 5 U.S.C. App.2 Sec.  9. The
HSRB provides advice, information, and recommendations to the EPA on
issues related to scientific and ethical aspects of human subjects
research. The major objectives of the HSRB are to provide advice and
recommendations on: (1) research proposals and protocols; (2) reports
of completed research with human subjects; and (3) how to strengthen
EPA's programs for protection of human subjects of research. The HSRB
reports to the EPA Administrator through the Agency's Science Advisor.
    1. Topic for discussion. At its meeting on October 1, 2013, EPA's
Human Studies Review Board will consider scientific and ethical issues
surrounding this topic:

    A new scenario design and associated protocol from the
Antimicrobial Exposure Assessment Task Force II (AEATF-II)
describing proposed research to monitor the dermal and inhalation
exposure during manual pouring of solid formulation antimicrobial
products. EPA requests the advice of the HSRB concerning whether, if
it is revised as suggested in EPA's review and if it is performed as
described, this research is likely to generate scientifically
reliable data, useful for assessing the exposure of those who pour
solid formulation antimicrobial pesticide products, and to meet the
applicable requirements of 40 CFR part 26, subparts K and L.
    In addition, the EPA will present general information about
EPA's Repellency Awareness Program and discuss possible implications
of this program for the HSRB.

    2. Meeting minutes and reports. Minutes of the meeting, summarizing
the matters discussed and recommendations, if any, made by the advisory
committee regarding such matters, will be released within 90 calendar
days of the meeting. Such minutes will be available at http://www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/ and http://www.regulations.gov. In addition,
information regarding the Board's final meeting report, will be found
at http://www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/ or from the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Dated: September 9, 2013.
Glenn Paulson,
Science Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2013-22745 Filed 9-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US

01/18/2008 12:05 PM

To

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

"Johansson, Robert"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>"Fraas, Arthur G."<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

Materials for today's 1:15 meeting on the O3 RIA extrapolated costs

Hi Everyone,  attached are materials for use today at our 1:15 meeting on extrapolated costs.  Let me know if you have any trouble with the file.

Thanks,

Janet

  _______________________________________

Janet F. Cakir, Ph.D.

Environmental Protection Specialist

Air Benefits Cost Group

109 TW Alexander Dr., (C439-02)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Tel:<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>

email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 248 (Thursday, December 28, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 89574-89576]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28645]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2023-0183
RIN 1625-AA09

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; River Rouge, Detroit, MI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is altering the operations of all movable
bridges over the River Rouge, Detroit, MI to improve communications and
establish winter hours.

DATES: This rule is effective January 29, 2024.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov. Type the
docket number (USCG-2023-0183) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH''. In the Document Type column, select ``Supporting & Related
Material.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary final rule, call or email Mr. Lee D. Soule, Bridge Management
Specialist, Ninth Coast Guard District; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
IGLD85 International Great Lakes Datum of 1985
LWD Low Water Datum based on IGLD85
OMB Office of Management and Budget
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On May 5, 2023, the Coast Guard published an NPRM, with a request
for comments, entitled ``Drawbridge Operations Regulation: River Rouge,
Detroit, MI ``in the Federal Register (88 FR 29005), to seek comments
on whether the Coast Guard should consider modifying current operating
schedules of certain drawbridges over the River Rouge to improve
communications and establish winter hours. The National Steel
Cooperation Railroad Bridge, mile 0.40, is a single leaf bascule bridge
that provides horizontal clearance of 125-feet and a vertical clearance
of 6-feet in the closed and an unlimited clearance above LWD.
    The West Jefferson Avenue Bridge, mile 1.10, is a double leaf
bascule Bridge that provides horizontal clearance of 125-feet and a
vertical clearance of 9-feet in the closed and an unlimited clearance
in the open position above LWD.
    The Conrail Bridge, mile 1.48, is a single leaf bascule bridge that
provides horizontal clearance of 123-feet and a vertical clearance of
8-feet in the closed and an unlimited clearance in the open position
above LWD and it is remotely operated.
    The Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge, mile 1.87, is a single leaf
bascule Bridge that provides horizontal clearance of 125-feet and a
vertical clearance of 8-feet in the closed and an unlimited clearance
in the open position above LWD.
    The Fort Street Bridge, mile 2.20, is a single leaf bascule Bridge
that provides horizontal clearance of 118-feet and a vertical clearance
of 9-feet in the closed and an unlimited clearance in the open position
above LWD.
    The main channel of the river was the result of Mr. Henry Ford
needing to straighten the entrance of the River Rouge to accommodate
deliveries of raw materials to his automotive plant. This main channel,
formally known as the short cut channel, formed Zug Island at the mouth
of the river. The original channel that curves around the north and
west sides of Zug Island is known as the old channel and is crossed by
two movable bridges.
    The Delray Connecting Railroad Bridge, mile 0.34, is a single leaf
bascule Bridge that provides horizontal clearance of 120-feet and a
vertical clearance of 7-feet in the closed and an unlimited clearance
in the open position above LWD.
    The Delray Connecting Railroad Bridge, mile 0.80, is a swing Bridge
that provides horizontal clearance of 102-feet and a vertical clearance
of 7-feet in the closed and an unlimited clearance in the open position
above LWD.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority 33 U.S.C. 499.
    Commercial mariners have expressed concern that the waterway is
crooked and narrow and that to safely navigate the river, they needed
to know the status of each bridge in the river prior to entering the
waterway. As such, commercial mariners requested that all bridges
maintain and operate a marine radio. Review by the Coast Guard of
specific complaints of repeated difficulty contacting the Conrail
Bridge and the Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge by radio caused the
Coast Guard to determine that these bridges must maintain and make
public a phone number for mariners to communicate with the drawtenders.
    The institution of winter hours for drawbridges over the River
Rouge will modernize bridge operations by authorizing the bridges to
operate with a 12-hour advance notice during winter months, as is the
practice for drawbridges on similar waterways throughout the Great
Lakes.

IV. Discussion of Comments

    The Coast Guard provided a comment period of 60 days, and no
comments were received.

IV. Discussion of Final Rule

    Commercial mariners have complained the waterway is crooked and
narrow and they needed to know the status of each bridge in the river
prior to entering the waterway. Requiring all bridges to maintain and
operate a marine radio will facilitate this need. Furthermore, the
complaints of difficulty contacting the Conrail Bridge, mile 1.48 and
the Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridges by radio the Coast Guard has
determined that these bridges make public a phone number for mariners
to communicate with the drawtenders.
    Awarding winter hours to the River Rouge has been over looked and
will be established in the regulation authorizing the bridges to
operate with a 12-hour advance notice from January 1 through March 31
when the river is normally frozen and impassable by most vessels.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the ability that
vessels can still transit the bridge given advanced notice.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard did not receive any comments from the Small
Business Administration on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.

    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V. A
above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
    We did not receive any comments during the NPRM.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal Government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01, Rev.1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning Policy COMDTINST 5090.1
(series) which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f). The
Coast Guard has determined that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This rule promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for drawbridges and is categorically excluded
from further review, under paragraph L49, of Chapter 3, Table3-1 of the
U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Implementation Procedures.
    Neither a Record of Environmental Consideration nor a Memorandum
for the Record are required for this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; and DHS Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.

0
2. Amend Sec.  117.645 River Rouge by revising paragraph (d) and adding
paragraphs (e) through (h) to read as follows:
* * * * *
    (d) The draw of the West Jefferson Avenue Bridge, mile 1.10, is
required to operate a radiotelephone, and shall open on signal except
from January 1 through March 31 when the bridge shall open on signal if
provided a 12-hour advance notice.
    (e) The draw of the Conrail Bridge, mile 1.48, is remotely
operated, is required to operate a radiotelephone and telephone, and
shall open on signal except from January 1 through March 31 when the
bridge shall open on signal if provided a 12-hour advance notice.
    (f) The draw of the Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge, mile 1.87, is
required to operate a radiotelephone and telephone, and shall open on
signal except from January 1 through March 31 when the bridge shall
open on signal if provided a 12-hour advance notice.
    (g) The draw of the Fort Street Bridge, mile 2.20, is required to
operate a radiotelephone, and shall open on signal except from January
1 through March 31 when the bridge shall open on signal if provided a
12-hour advance notice.
    (h) The draw of the Dix Avenue Bridge, mile 2.73, is remotely
operated, is required to operate a radiotelephone, and shall open on
signal except from January 1 through March 31 when the bridge shall
open on signal if provided a 12-hour advance notice.

Jonathan Hickey,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Ninth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2023-28645 Filed 12-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 218 (Monday, November 14, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68053-68054]
[FR Doc No: 2022-24664]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2022-0731]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Mission Bay Closure, San Diego, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
certain waters of Mission Bay near San Diego, California. The safety
zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from potential hazards created by the California Department
of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Oil Spill Prevention and Response (OSPR)
Sensitive Site Strategy Evaluation Program (SSSEP) boom deployment
exercise. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector San
Diego.

DATES: This rule is effective from 9 a.m. to noon on November 15, 2022.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2022-0731 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
rulemaking, call or email LTJG Shera Kim, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego, Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On November 15, 2022, the Coast guard will be working in
conjunction with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and
local Oil Spill Response Organization ito conduct boom deployment
exercises from 9 a.m. to noon. Contractors will bring up to 12000-feet
of floating oil boom aboard a workboat and deploy Area Contingency Plan
(ACP)-6 Geographic Response Strategies (GRS). The Captain of the Port
Sector San Diego (COTP) has determined that potential hazards
associated with the boom deployment exercise would be a safety concern
for anyone within a 100-yard radius of the boom. The COTP is
establishing a safety zone from 9 a.m. to noon on November 15, 2022.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the navigable waters within a 100-yard radius of the boom before,
during, and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard has rulemaking
authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Coast
Guard published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled ``Safety
Zone; Mission Bay Closure, San Diego, CA'' at 87 FR 55974 (September
13, 2022). There we stated why we issued the NPRM, and invited comments
on our proposed regulatory action related to this safety zone. During
the comment period that ended October 13, 2022, we received zero
comments.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to public interest because immediate action
is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards associated with
the pipeline repair operations for the damaged pipeline.

III. Discussion of Rule

    The COTP is establishing a safety zone from 9 a.m. until noon on
November 15, 2022. The safety zone covers all navigable waters within
100 yards of a boom in Mission Bay located across the entrance channel
from the shoreline north of Mariners Cove inlet to a point south of
Mission Bay Drive bridge on the Quivira Basin shoreline. The duration
of the zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these
navigable waters before, during, and after the scheduled 9 a.m. until
noon boom deployment exercise. No vessel or person would be permitted
to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or
a designated representative. A designated representative means a a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast
Guard vessel designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Sector
San Diego (COTP) in the enforcement of the safety zone.
    To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by VHF Channel 16. Those in the safety zone must comply
with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
    The COTP or a designated representative will inform the public
through Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs), Local Notices to Mariners
(LNMs), and/or Marine Safety Information Bulletins (MSIBs) as
appropriate of the enforcement times and dates for the safety zone.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the rule
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on safety zone being
of a limited three hour duration, limited to a relatively small
geographic area, and the presence of safety hazards in the area
encompassing the Mission Bay Entrance.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended,

requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. This rule will not result in such
an expenditure.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a determination that this action
is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves a safety zone lasting 3 hours that prohibits entry within
100 yards of the boom. Normally, such actions are categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph L60 of Appendix A, Table 1
of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T11-0114 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T11-0114   Safety Zone; Mission Bay, San Diego, CA.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: Mission Bay
located across the entrance channel from the shoreline north of
Mariners Cove inlet to a point south of Mission Bay Drive bridge on the
Quivira Basin shoreline.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating
a Coast Guard vessel designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port
Sector San Diego (COTP) in the enforcement of the safety zone.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by VHF Channel 16. Those in the safety zone must comply
with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
    (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 9 a.m.
until noon on November 15, 2022.
    (e) Information broadcasts. The COTP or a designated representative
will inform the public through Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs),
Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs), and/or Marine Safety Information
Bulletins (MSIBs) as appropriate of the enforcement times and dates for
the safety zone.

    Dated: November 4, 2022.
J.W. Spitler,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2022-24664 Filed 11-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6031-6032]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02024]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4246-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2016-0001]

Idaho; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for State of Idaho (FEMA-4246-DR), dated December 23, 2015, and related
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: January 20, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Dolph A.
Diemont, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating
Officer for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Thomas J. Dargan as
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2016-02024 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19751-19752]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09504]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Number: PR18-43-000.
    Applicants: NorthWestern Corporation.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)/: Revised Rate
Schedules for Transportation & Storage Service (D2016.9.68 Phase 2) to
be effective 4/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/27/18.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>05.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/27/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-599-000.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Annual Incidental Purchases and Sales Report of
Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Filed Date: 3/27/18.
    Accession Number: 20180327-5203.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/4/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-743-000.
    Applicants: Discovery Gas Transmission LLC.
    Description: Imbalance Cash-out Report for 2017 Activity for
Discovery Gas Transmission LLC.
    Filed Date: 4/25/18.
    Accession Number: 20180425-5261.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/7/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-464-001.

    Applicants: Nautilus Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing Nautilus LINK Integration Compliance
Filing to be effective 5/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/26/18.
    Accession Number: 20180426-5169.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-744-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: DETI--April 26, 2018
Negotiated Rate Agreements to be effective 5/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/26/18.
    Accession Number: 20180426-5158.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-745-000.
    Applicants: Garden Banks Gas Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: PAL Service Modifications to
be effective 6/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/26/18.
    Accession Number: 20180426-5177.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-746-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement
Update (APS May 2018) to be effective 5/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/26/18.
    Accession Number: 20180426-5219.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-747-000.
    Applicants: EQT Energy, LLC.
    Description: Petition of EQT Energy, LLC For Temporary Waiver under
RP18-747.
    Filed Date: 4/26/18.
    Accession Number: 20180426-5242.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-748-000.
    Applicants: Bluewater Gas Storage, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Revisions to Pro Forma Service
Agreements to be effective 4/30/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/27/18.
    Accession Number: 20180427-5245.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be considered,
but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 30, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-09504 Filed 5-3-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ OECA 2005 0040; FRL ]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Portland Cement ( Renewal), ICR Number 1801.04, OMB Number 2060 0416 AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA)

ACTION: Notice SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, this document announces that an Information Collection Request ( ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget ( OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing approved collection. This ICR is scheduled to expire on October 31, 2005. Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. This ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before [ 30 days after publication in the FEDERAL REGISTER].

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number OECA 2005 0040, to ( 1)

EPA online using EDOCKET ( our preferred method), by email to docket. oeca@ epa. gov, or by mail to: Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center ( EPA/ DC), Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center ( EPA/ DC) EPA West, Mail Code 2201T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460, and ( 2) OMB at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget ( OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA,

725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503. 2 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leonard Lazarus, Compliance Assessment and Media Programs Division ( CAMPD), Office of Compliance, Mail code: 2223A,

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460;

telephone number: ( 202) 564 6369; fax number: ( 202) 564 0050; E mail address:

lazarus. leonard@ epa. gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR 1320.12. On May 6, 2005 ( 70 FR 24020), EPA sought comments on this ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8( d). EPA received no comments.

EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number OECA 2005

0040, which is available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center, ( EPA/ DC) EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8: 30 a. m. to 4: 30 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is ( 202) 566 1744, and the telephone number for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center Docket is: ( 202) 566 1752. An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA Dockets ( EDOCKET) at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket. Use EDOCKET to submit or to view public comments, to access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. When in the system, select " search," then key in the docket ID number identified above.

Any comments related to this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days 3 of this notice. EPA's policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public viewing in EDOCKET as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, confidential business information ( CBI), or other information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in the version of the comment that is placed in EDOCKET. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket. Although identified as an item in the official docket, information claimed as CBI, or whose disclosure is otherwise restricted by statute,

is not included in the official public docket, and will not be available for public viewing in EDOCKET. For further information about the electronic docket, see EPA's Federal Register notice describing the electronic docket at 67 FR 38102 ( May 31, 2002), or go to www. epa. gov/ edocket.

Title: NESHAP for Portland Cement ( Renewal)

Abstract: Respondents are owners or operators of portland cement manufacturing plants.

The rule applies to each new, existing or reconstructed kiln, in line kiln/ raw mill and greenfield raw material dryer at these facilities, except for kilns and in line kiln/ raw mills that burn hazardous waste. In addition, the rule applies to each new, existing or reconstructed clinker cooler; raw mill;

finish mill; raw material, clinker or finished product storage bin; conveying system transfer point;

bagging system and bulk loading and unloading system at facilities that are major sources; and to each existing, reconstructed or new brownfield raw material dryer at facilities that are major sources. 4 Respondents shall submit notifications ( where applicable) and reports of initial and repeat performance test results. Plants must develop and implement a startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan and submit semiannual reports of any event where the plan was not followed.

Plants must develop and implement an operations and maintenance plan and conduct and report the results of an annual combustion system inspection. Semiannual reports for periods of operation during which the monitoring parameters are exceeded ( or reports certifying that no exceedances have occurred) also are required.

Subpart LLL requires respondents to install ( where feasible) continuous opacity monitors and temperature monitoring systems on kilns and in line kiln raw mills, and total hydrocarbon ( THC) continuous emission monitors ( CEMs) on new greenfield kilns, in line kiln/ raw mills and raw material dryers. Owners and operators are also subject to a deferred requirement to install particulate matter ( PM) CEMS.

General requirements applicable to all National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants ( NESHAP) require records of applicability determinations; test results; exceedances;

periods of startups, shutdowns, or malfunctions; monitoring records; and all other information needed to determine compliance with the applicable standard. Records and reports must be retained for a total of 5 years ( 2 years at the site; the remaining 3 years of records may be retained off site). The files may be maintained on microfilm, on computer or floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on microfiche. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority. In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are sent directly to the EPA regional office. This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart LLL as authorized in sections 112 and 114( a) of the Clean Air Act. The required information 5 consists of emissions data and other information that have been determined not to be private.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15, and are identified on the form and/ or instrument, if applicable.

Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 42 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; to develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; to adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; to train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; to search data sources; to complete and review the collection of information; and to transmit or otherwise disclose the information.

Respondents/ Affected Entities: Portland cement manufacturing facilities Estimated Number of Respondents: 107 Frequency of Response: Initial, Semiannually, On Occasion, Initially Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 17,526 hours Estimated Total Annual Costs: $ 2,205,272, which includes $ 0 annualized capital/ startup costs, $ 791,800 annual O& M costs, and $ 1,413,472 annual labor costs. 6 Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of 35,655 hours in the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens. This decrease is due to a correction to the tables, which did not properly account for all reporting requirements incurred by existing facilities.

Dated:

Oscar Morales, Director, Collection Strategies Division


[Federal Register: November 4, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 213)]
[Notices]
[Page 68014-68015]
[DOCID:fr04no10-85]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63215; File No. SR-FICC-2010-07]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to a Proposed Fee

October 29, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on October 18, 2010 the Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation (``FICC'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared
primarily by FICC. FICC filed the proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \2\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \3\
thereunder so that the proposal was effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The proposed rule change amends FICC's Government Securities
Division's (``GSD'') Fee Structure to add a monthly fee of $250 for GCF
participants with the exception of the GCF inter-dealer brokers for the
development and maintenance of the DTCC GCF Repo Index.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, FICC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. FICC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    The proposed rule change amends the GSD Fee Structure to add a
monthly fee of $250 for GCF participants with the exception of the GCF
inter-dealer brokers for the development and maintenance of the DTCC
GCF Repo Index. This fee will become effective as of December 1, 2010.
The index will provide the daily weighted average of the general
collateral rate for each of the three most highly traded GCF Repo
CUSIPs along with the total par value of all daily transactions in each
CUSIP. FICC plans to post the index daily on FICC's Web site.

    FICC states that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of Section 17A of the Act \4\ and the rules and
regulations thereunder because the DTCC GCF Repo Index provides
additional transparency to the funding market by making data available
that is generated by GSD's GCF Repo product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    FICC does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any
impact or impose any burden on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others

    FICC has not solicited or received written comments relating to the
proposed rule change. FICC will notify the Commission of any comments
it receives.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \5\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \6\ because the
proposed rule change establishes or changes a due, fee, or other charge
applicable only to a member. At any time within 60 days of the filing
of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily
suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Supra note 2.
    \6\ Supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml) or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-FICC-2010-07 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-FICC-2010-07. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filings also will be available for
inspection and copying at FICC's principal office and on FICC's Web
site at http://ficc.com/gov/gov.docs.jsp?NS-query=#rf. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submission should refer to File No. SR-FICC-2010-07 and should be
submitted on or before November 26, 2010.

    For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-27860 Filed 11-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 70 (Thursday, April 13, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17780-17782]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07513]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2017-0207]
RIN 1625-AA08

Special Local Regulation; Coos Bay, North Bend, OR

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary regulated
area during the inbound and outbound transit of the tall ships
participating in the Festival of Sail to be held on the waters of Coos
Bay. This action is necessary to safeguard participants and spectators
from the hazards associated with the limited maneuverability of tall
ships and to ensure public safety during their transit. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 15, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
USCG-2017-0207 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email LCDR Laura Springer, MSU Portland
Waterways;<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On June 1, 2017, and again on June 5, 2017, several class A and B
tall sailing ships will be transiting the waters of Coos Bay as part of
the Festival of Sail Coos Bay. To provide for the safety of
participants, spectators, support and transiting vessels, the Coast
Guard proposes to temporarily restrict vessel traffic during the the
inbound and outbound transit of the tall sailing ships.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to protect the tall ships from
potential harm and to protect the public from the hazards associated
with the limited maneuverability of these types of ships. Many factors
amplify the potential hazardousness of the situation, including: large
numbers of local recreational and fishing vessels; a narrow channel;
and, low maneuverability of the tall ships. The Coast Guard proposes
this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1233.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes to establish a regulated area during the
inbound and outbound transit of participating tall sailing ships on
June 1, 2017 and June 5, 2017. The regulated area would cover all
navigable waters of Coos Bay from the sea buoy to the Ferndale Lower
Range in North Bend, OR. The duration of the regulated area is intended
to ensure the safety of vessels, bystanders, and the navigable waters
during the tall ships' inbound and outbound transits. The Coast Guard,
at its discretion, would allow the passage of affected vessels. No
vessel or person would be permitted to enter the regulated area without
obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    E.O.s 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and Review'') and 13563
(``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review'') direct agencies to
assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that
maximize net benefits including potential economic, environmental,
public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity.
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. Executive Order 13771 (``Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs''), directs agencies to reduce regulation
and control regulatory costs and provides that ``for every one new
regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be identified for
elimination, and that the cost of planned regulations be prudently
managed and controlled through a budgeting process.''
    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not designated this
rule a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
not reviewed it.
    As this rule is not a significant regulatory action, this rule is
exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. See OMB's
Memorandum titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the
Executive Order of January 30, 2017 titled `Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs''' (February 2, 2017).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the regulated area. Although
this proposal would prevent traffic from transiting portions of Coos
Bay, the effect of this regulation would not be significant due to the
limited duration that the regulated area will be in effect and will
allow waterway users to enter or transit through the zone when deemed
safe by the on-scene patrol commander. Moreover, the Coast Guard would
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about
the regulated area.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and

operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental
jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This rule involves a Special Local
Regulation for a regulated area lasting less than 3 hours during each
transit period that will prohibit vessels from entering an area
encompassing Coos Bay from the sea buoy to the Ferndale Lower Range
unless given permission to do so by the on-scene patrol commander or
his designated representative. Normally such actions are categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(h) of Figure 2-1 of
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary environmental analysis
checklist and Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.

0
2. Add Sec.  100.T13-0207 to read as follows:

Sec.  100.T13-0207   Special Local Regulations; Festival of Sail Coos
Bay

    (a) Regulated Area. The following area is designated as a regulated
area: All navigable waters of Coos Bay, from the sea buoy to the
Ferndale Lower Range.
    (b) Special Local Regulations. (1) The Coast Guard may patrol the
regulated area under the direction of a designated Coast Guard Patrol
Commander (PATCOM). PATCOM may be contacted on Channel 16 VHF-FM (156.8
MHz) by the call sign ``PATCOM.'' Official patrol vessels may consist
of any Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or local law
enforcement vessels assigned or approved by the Captain of the Port,
Sector Columbia River.
    (2) Entrance into the regulated area is prohibited unless
authorized by the Patrol Commander. The Patrol Commander may control
the movement of all vessels in the regulated area. When hailed or
signaled to stop by an official patrol vessel, a vessel shall come to
an immediate stop and comply with the lawful directions issued. Failure
to comply with a lawful direction may result in expulsion from the
area, citation for failure to comply, or both.
    (3) All vessels permitted to transit the regulated area shall
maintain a separation of at least 100 yards away from the participating
tall sailing ships and a distance of at least 50 yards away while
transiting in the vicinity of the McCullough Memorial Bridge and the
Coos Bay railroad bridge.
    (c) Enforcement Period. This regulated area is in effect while the
tall sailing ships are transiting Coos Bay, inbound on June 1, 2017 and
outbound on June 5, 2017.

    Dated: April 3, 2017.
M.E. Butt,
RADM, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2017-07513 Filed 4-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 103 (Tuesday, June 1, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29178-29180]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11427]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0030; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01395-T;
Amendment 39-21555; AD 2021-10-22]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-1A10 airplanes. This AD was
prompted by a report indicating that during installation, a fuel pipe
bracket assembly on the intermediate rib in the center fuel tank was
mislocated, resulting in an offset between the fitting assembly and the
refuel/defuel tube assembly. This AD requires modification of the fuel
pipe bracket assembly, including all related investigative actions and
corrective actions, if necessary; and performing an operational test of
the refuel and defuel system. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective July 6, 2021.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of July 6,
2021.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet https://

www.bombardier.com. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2021-0030.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-
0030; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, any comments received, and other information. The
address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Siddeeq Bacchus, Aerospace Engineer,
Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services Section, FAA, New York
ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued TCCA AD CF-2020-37, dated October 9,
2020 (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or the MCAI), to correct an unsafe condition for certain
Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-1A10 airplanes. You may examine the MCAI
in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0030.
    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Bombardier,
Inc., Model BD-700-1A10 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on February 24, 2021 (86 FR 11191). The NPRM was prompted by a
report indicating that during installation, a fuel pipe bracket
assembly on the intermediate rib in the center fuel tank was
mislocated, resulting in an offset between the fitting assembly and the
refuel/defuel tube assembly. The NPRM proposed to require modification
of the fuel pipe bracket assembly, including all related investigative
actions and corrective actions, if necessary; and performing an
operational test of the refuel and defuel system. The FAA is issuing
this AD to address the offset, which could cause a preload on the fuel
pipes and reduce their ability to absorb shock or vibration-induced
loads, making the tube and clamp more prone to stress corrosion
cracking. This could lead to failure of the coupling and the bracket
and p-clamp assembly, resulting in fuel leakage and loss of electrical
bonding between fuel pipes, and lightning-induced sparking that could
induce fuel ignition. See the MCAI for additional background
information.

Comments

    The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule. The FAA received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety
and the public interest require adopting this final rule as proposed,
except for minor editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these
minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Bombardier has issued Service Bulletin 700-28-6006, dated June 1,
2020. This service information describes procedures for a modification
of the fuel pipe bracket assembly, including investigative actions (a
detailed visual inspection of the fuel pipe assembly for any damaged
paint, permanent deformation, corrosion, cracking, gouges, dents, or
deep scratches); installation of certain new parts; replacement of the
fuel pipe and fuel pipe bracket assembly, if necessary; and an
operational test of the refuel and defuel system. This service
information is reasonably available because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 51 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 work-hours x $85 per hour = $850..........................            $904           $1,754          $89,454
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition action that would be required based on the results of any
required actions. The FAA has no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need this on-condition action:

                                     Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                                  Labor cost                                       Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 work-hours x $85 per hour = $255............................................          $1,937           $2,192
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the manufacturer, some or all of the costs of this AD
may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected operators. The FAA does not control warranty coverage for
affected operators. As a result, the FAA has included all known costs
in the cost estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2021-10-22 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-21555; Docket No. FAA-
2021-0030; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01395-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective July 6, 2021.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-1A10
airplanes, certificated in any category, serial numbers 9657 through
9844 inclusive.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28, Fuel.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report indicating that during
installation, a fuel pipe bracket assembly on the intermediate rib
in the center fuel tank was mislocated, resulting in an offset
between the fitting assembly and the refuel/defuel tube assembly.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address the offset, which could cause
a preload on the fuel pipes and reduce their ability to absorb shock
or vibration-induced loads, making the tube and clamp more prone to
stress corrosion cracking. This could lead to failure of the
coupling and the bracket and p-clamp assembly, resulting in fuel
leakage and loss of electrical bonding between fuel pipes, and
lightning-induced sparking that could induce fuel ignition.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Inspection and Corrective Action

    Within 30 months after the effective date of this AD: Perform a
modification of the fuel pipe bracket assembly and refuel tube
assembly; do all related investigative actions and applicable
corrective actions; and perform an operational test of the refuel
and defuel system; in accordance with paragraphs 2.B. and 2.C. of
the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-
28-6006, dated June 1, 2020. All related investigative and
corrective actions must be done before further flight.

(h) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If
sending information directly to the manager of the certification
office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or
Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If
approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature.

(i) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) TCCA AD CF-2020-37, dated October 9, 2020, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2021-0030.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Siddeeq Bacchus,
Aerospace Engineer, Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services
Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-28-6006, dated June 1, 2020.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet https://www.bombardier.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on May 6, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-11427 Filed 5-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


,780
1
2
.
2
Arkansas
189
,021
9.
9
212,687
1
0.
6
243,901
12.
1
231
,481
11.
3
246,838
1
2
.
0
2
3
9
,803
1
1
.
4
California
2,832,152
11.
5
3
,044,855
1
2
.
1
3
,209,230
12.
7
3
,473,157
13.
4
3
,681,050
14
.
0
3,488,798
13.
2
Colorado
289
,301
9.
5
394,610
1
2.
1
404,461
12.
1
424
,685
12.
4
462,911
1
3
.
5
4
6
3
,459
1
3
.
3
Connecticut
269
,833
10.
8
321,831
1
2.
3
341,552
13.
2
319
,497
12.
2
402,123
1
5
.
3
3
3
1
,736
1
2
.
4
Delaware
59,724
10.
4
71,450
1
1
.
9
7
1
,567
11.
8
72,281
11.
7
91,569
14
.
4
8
1
,603
1
2
.
6
District of Columbia
44,925
11.
0
54,330
1
2
.
0
6
5
,214
14.
2
58,117
12.
7
69,533
15
.
3
6
6
,966
1
5
.
3
Florida
1
,076,350
9
.
1
1,242,381
9.
9
1
,348,584
10.
5
1
,327,772
10.
1
1
,634,184
12
.
3
1,605,472
11.
7
Georgia
557
,965
9.
6
674,099
1
1.
0
728,052
11.
7
757
,493
11.
8
797,776
1
2
.
3
7
7
1
,633
1
1
.
5
Hawaii
102
,277
11.
4
111,954
1
2.
1
125,142
13.
4
110
,997
11.
6
N/A
12
.
3
13
7,523
1
4
.
1
Idaho
96,499
10.
8
108,286
1
1.
7
113,045
11.
8
114
,347
11.
7
131,431
1
3
.
1
1
2
3
,425
1
1
.
7
Illinois
955
,071
10.
6
1
,049,350
1
1
.
3
992,316
10.
7
1
,046,454
11.
1
1
,235,253
13
.
1
1,009,367
10.
6
Indiana
494
,719
11.
2
515,076
1
1.
3
514,621
11.
3
552
,962
12.
0
615,746
1
3
.
3
5
9
2
,979
1
2
.
7
Iowa
181
,406
8.
5
212,254
9
.
7
197,950
9.
0
227
,881
10.
3
237,427
1
0
.
5
2
6
6
,282
1
1
.
6
Kansas
214
,168
10.
9
232,248
1
1.
6
222,271
11.
2
232
,690
11.
5
244,306
1
2
.
0
2
2
3
,603
1
0
.
8
Kentucky
317
,557
10.
7
333,057
1
0.
9
393,275
12.
8
391
,927
12.
6
444,475
1
3
.
9
4
2
4
,702
1
3
.
3
Louisiana
251
,523
8.
0
293,612
9
.
1
340,082
10.
4
336
,420
10.
2
389,856
1
1
.
8
3
6
4
,606
1
0
.
8
Maine
117
,749
12.
5
121,535
1
2.
6
134,683
13.
6
134
,498
13.
4
150,850
1
4
.
7
1
5
6
,625
1
5
.
0
Maryland
413
,442
10.
6
445,760
1
1.
1
510,826
12.
7
507
,830
12.
3
575,936
1
3
.
9
5
4
9
,863
1
3
.
1
Massachusetts
566
,455
11.
9
639,174
1
3.
0
629,268
12.
9
710
,328
14.
4
743,248
1
4
.
9
7
0
1
,580
1
4
.
2
Michigan
751
,031
10.
3
914,468
1
2.
4
949,081
12.
8
1
,019,132
13.
6
1
,010,998
13
.
4
1,055,925
13.
9
Minnesota
334
,685
9.
5
368,504
1
0.
1
416,551
11.
3
395
,216
10.
5
441,325
1