[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78307-78309]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31478]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63501; File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2010-117]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Amex LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Amex
Equities Rule 80C To Extend the Effective Date of the Pilot

December 9, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that on December 7, 2010, NYSE Amex LLC (``NYSE Amex'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Amex Equities Rule 80C to
extend the effective date of the pilot by which such rule operates,
which is currently scheduled to expire on December 10, 2010, until
April 11, 2011. The text of the proposed rule change is available at
the Exchange, the Commission's Public Reference Room, and http://www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Amex Equities Rule 80C to
extend the effective date of the pilot by which such rule operates,
which is currently scheduled to expire on December 10, 2010,\3\ until
April 11, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62252 (June 10,
2010), 75 FR 34186 (June 16, 2010) (SR-NYSEAmex-2010-46).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NYSE Amex Equities Rule 80C requires the Exchange to pause trading
in an individual security listed on the Exchange if the price moves by
10% as compared to prices of that security in the preceding five-minute
period during a trading day, which period is defined as a ``Trading
Pause.'' The pilot was developed and implemented as a market-wide
initiative by the Exchange and other national securities exchanges in
consultation with the Commission staff and is currently applicable to
all S&P 500 Index securities, Russell 1000 Index securities, and
specified exchange-traded products.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange notes that the other national securities
exchanges have adopted the pilot in substantially similar form.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The extension proposed herein would allow the pilot to continue to
operate without interruption while the Exchange, other national
securities exchanges and the Commission further assess the effect of
the pilot on the marketplace or whether other initiatives should be
adopted in lieu of the current pilot.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\5\ in
general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\6\
in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange
believes that the change proposed herein meets these requirements in
that it promotes uniformity across markets concerning decisions to
pause trading in a security when there are significant price movements.
Additionally, extension of the pilot to April 11, 2011 would allow the
pilot to continue to operate without interruption while the Exchange
and the Commission further assess the effect of the pilot on the
marketplace or whether other initiatives should be adopted in lieu of
the current pilot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (1)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) impose any significant burden on competition; and (3)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). When filing a proposed rule change
pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the Act, an exchange is required
to give the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the
proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as
designated by the Commission. The Commission notes that the Exchange
has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally may
not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of filing.\9\
However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \10\ permits the Commission to designate a
shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The Exchange has requested that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative delay.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has considered the Exchange's request to waive the
30-day operative delay. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day
operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest, as it will allow the pilot program to continue
uninterrupted, thereby avoiding the investor confusion that could
result from a temporary interruption in the pilot program.\11\
Therefore, the Commission designates the proposed rule change to be
operative upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ For the purposes only of waiving the operative date of this
proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact
on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2010-117 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission,

100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2010-117. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NYSEAmex-2010-117 and should be submitted on or before January 5, 2011.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-31478 Filed 12-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US

06/25/2008 03:22 PM

To

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Brian Heninger/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Charles Fulcher/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Darryl Weatherhead/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Neal Fann/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Rosalina Rodriguez/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tom Walton/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

Re: PB RIA for clearance

Heidi -- the last edit requested by OPEI is now incorporated as the bottom bullet to the table on ES-13, and as an addtional paragraph to section 6.1.4 on page 6-15.

So here's your courtesy copy of the ultimate version of the Pb proposal RIA.  I just re-sent it through Eileen Pritchard as well.

Enjoy!

-- Kathy

Kathy Kaufman

EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C539-03

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>

Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US

06/25/2008 11:28 AM

To

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Brian Heninger/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Charles Fulcher/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Darryl Weatherhead/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Neal Fann/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Rosalina Rodriguez/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tom Walton/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

PB RIA for clearance

Heidi -- here's the full Pb proposal RIA, for clearance.

I just sent it through Eileen Pritchard in OPEI, but in the interest of time am also forwarding courtesy copies directly to you.

Thanks.

-- Kathy

[attachment "Pb RIA_Full Text 6-25-08.doc" deleted by Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US]

Kathy Kaufman

EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C539-03

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Dear Mr. Zeller:

I am writing as an individual consumer and citizen of the USA, to request an extension of the comment period

for the Food and Drug Administration's ("FDA") Proposed Rule Deeming Tobacco

Products to be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by

the Family Smoking and Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the "Proposed Rule")

published at 79 Fed. Reg. 23,142 and Federal Register No. 2014-09491. On behalf of

myself, I am requesting that the comment period for the Proposed Rule be extended by

the FDA for an additional 105 days, from its current 75-day period, to 180 days.

The Proposed Rule raises a number of significant issues and questions that are

important and relevant to me, as a consumer of products that are proposed for

regulation under the Proposed Rule. The Proposed Rule asks about a hundred different

questions I might want to respond to. I want to provide my thoughts and comments on

many of these issues, but my time to devote to researching and providing thoughtful

comments on these important questions is limited. I have already spent many hours

researching and dissecting these issues, but they take time. I know that the FDA

took many years to even come up with the Proposed Rule, so I do not think it is at

all unreasonable to allow the public a mere six months to comment on it. This is our

only opportunity, as consumers, to provide our feedback.

I feel very strongly about e-cigarettes as an alternative to combustible cigarettes.

Quite simply, I firmly believe that they saved my life and the life of my wife and

my friends who have started vaping. I wish to provide you with my personal story, as

well as science- and evidence-based responses to your questions so that you can take

my comment into account. I realize that the FDA has the authority under 21 CFR 10.40

to extend this time frame and that the FDA has exercised this authority on numerous

occasions in the past. I would therefore ask that you do so here, so that all

stakeholders have the opportunity to provide their comments on this proposed

regulation.

I appreciate your consideration of my request and am happy to discuss this issue

with you further.

As a citizen of the USA, and a member of a group that may be in the minority, it is

important that the majority does not impress its will on us for biased,

unscientific, baseless grounds.


MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: 	2-15-12 Meeting with ReCommunity

FROM:	Marc Thomas
      Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO:		Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On February 15, 2012, EPA met with representatives from ReCommunity to discuss a reengineered feedstock the company had developed.  During the meeting, ReCommunity provided information as to why they believed this material constituted a non-waste fuel pursuant to the Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials (NHSM) rulemakings (76 FR 15456 and 76 FR 80452).  EPA asked clarifying questions.  Attendees list below.

Meeting Attendees

Robert A. Wyman (Latham & Watkins)
Eli W. L. Hopson (Latham & Watkins)
Lisa Feldt (EPA)
Janet McCabe (EPA)
Joseph Goffman (EPA)
Jim Berlow (EPA)
Susmita Dubey (EPA)
Peter Tsirigotis (EPA, by phone)


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 125 (Monday, June 30, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36629-36631]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14800]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 125 / Monday, June 30, 2014 / Rules
and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0385; Directorate Identifier 2013-SW-079-AD;
Amendment 39-17879; AD 2014-13-04]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Columbia Helicopters, Inc. (Type
Certificate Previously Held by Boeing Defense & Space Group)
Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Columbia Helicopters, Inc. (Columbia) Model 234 helicopters. This AD
requires visually and tap inspecting each fore and aft rotor blade for
any defect, damage, or a disbond and, if necessary, repairing or
replacing the blade. Also, this AD requires dye-penetrant inspecting
the aft pylon structure for fatigue cracking in certain areas near the
attachment fittings and, if there is a crack, repairing or replacing
the aft pylon. This AD is prompted by an accident caused by fatigue
failure of an aft pylon fitting attach structure combined with aft
rotor blade damage. The actions specified by this AD are intended to
detect fatigue cracks in the aft pylon attach structure to prevent
overload of the aft pylon structure and failure of the rotor blade,
rotor blade vibration, departure of the aft pylon, and subsequent loss
of control of the helicopter.

DATES: This AD becomes effective July 15, 2014.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain documents listed in this AD as of July 15, 2014.
    We must receive comments on this AD by August 29, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket Operations Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, any incorporated by reference
service information, the economic evaluation, any comments received,
and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations
Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Columbia
Helicopters, Inc., 14452 Arndt Road NE., Aurora OR 97002, telephone
(503) 678-1222, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, or at http://www.colheli.com/.
    You may review the referenced service information at the FAA,
Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd.,
Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Arrigotti, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not provide you with notice and an opportunity to
provide your comments prior to it becoming effective. However, we
invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that resulted
from adopting this AD. The most helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the AD, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain
duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written
comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should
submit them only one time. We will file in the docket all comments that
we receive, as well as a report summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerning this rulemaking during the
comment period. We will consider all the comments we receive and may
conduct additional rulemaking based on those comments.

Discussion

    We are adopting a new AD for Columbia Model 234 helicopters. This
AD requires visually and tap inspecting each rotor blade for any
defect, damage, or disbond. If there is a defect, damage, or a disbond,
this AD requires the blade to be repaired or replaced before further
flight. Also, this AD requires dye-penetrant inspecting the aft pylon
structure for a crack in the area of the station (STA) 534 and 594
tension attachment fittings. If there is a crack, this AD requires
repairing or replacing the aft pylon before further flight. This AD is
prompted by an accident caused by fatigue failure of the structure
surrounding the aft pylon following an aft rotor blade failure. Due to
existing blade damage, a portion of an aft rotor blade separated from
the aircraft, causing vibration, which accelerated fatigue cracking of
the aft pylon surrounding structure and overloaded the structure to
failure. This caused the aft pylon to separate from the aircraft. The
actions specified in this AD are intended to detect cracks in the aft
pylon surrounding structure and defects, damage, or disbonds in the
rotor blades and to prevent separation of a portion of the rotor blade,
vibration, overload of the aft pylon surrounding structure, departure
of the aft pylon, and

subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

FAA's Determination

    We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other helicopters of this same type
design.

Related Service Information

    Columbia issued Service Bulletin No. 234-54-0004, Revision 0, dated
November 22, 2013 (SB 234-54-0004), specifying an initial and recurring
dye-penetrant inspection to detect and correct cracking of the aft
pylon structure at the STA 534 and 594 tension attachment fittings. If
a crack is found, SB 234-54-0004 specifies contacting the manufacturer
before further flight.
    Columbia also issued Service Bulletin No. 234-62-0008, Revision 1,
dated December 6, 2013 (SB 234-62-0008), specifying recurring visual
inspections of the entire rotor blade for defects, damage and disbonds
and recurring tap inspections of the rotor blade trailing edge for
disbonding conditions. If any damage or disbond is detected, SB 234-62-
0008 specifies referring to the maintenance manual for serviceability
and repair, contacting the manufacturer for repair assistance, or
replacing the blade before further flight.

AD Requirements

    This AD requires:

 Within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS):
    [cir] Cleaning, visually inspecting, and tap inspecting each rotor
blade for a defect, damage, or disbond.
    [cir] Repairing any defect, damage, or disbond if within acceptable
limits, and replacing the blade if beyond acceptable limits, before
further flight.

 Within 50 hours TIS and thereafter at intervals not to exceed
100 hours TIS, inspecting the aft pylon at STA 534 and 594 as follows:
    [cir] Dye-penetrant inspecting the aft pylon at the attachment
fittings and surrounding structure for a crack.
    [cir] If there is a crack, before further flight, repairing or
replacing the aft pylon.

    This AD prohibits installing an aft pylon or a rotor blade until
these inspections are accomplished.

Differences Between This AD and the Service Information

    This AD does not require the 500-hour TIS inspection of the rotor
blade or the 3,000 hour TIS after initial inspection of the pylon
structure as specified in the service information. We plan to publish a
notice of proposed rulemaking to give the public an opportunity to
comment on those long-term requirements. Also, this AD does not require
contacting the manufacturer.

Interim Action

    We consider this AD to be an interim action. The design approval
holder is currently developing a terminating action that will address
the unsafe condition identified in this AD. Once this terminating
action is identified, we might consider further rulemaking then.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 4 helicopters of U.S. Registry. We
estimate that operators may incur the following costs to comply with
this AD. Labor costs are estimated at $85 per hour. We estimate 1 work
hour to visually inspect all blades, 6 work hours to dye-penetrant
inspect the pylon, and 4 work hours to do the tap test inspection.
Based on these estimates, the total cost is $935 per helicopter and
$3,740 for the U.S. fleet. To replace a blade, we estimate 4 work hours
and $250,000 for parts, for a total cost of $250,340 per helicopter.

FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date

    Providing an opportunity for public comments before adopting these
AD requirements would delay implementing the safety actions needed to
correct this known unsafe condition. Therefore, we find that the risk
to the flying public justifies waiving notice and comment prior to
adopting this rule because of the severity of the failure and high rate
of occurrence for repairs in blades and cracks in the pylon on other
aircraft. Also, the required corrective actions must be done within 50
hours TIS, a very short time period based on the average flight-hour
utilization rate of these helicopters. The repetitive inspections are
required at intervals not to exceed 100 hours TIS, which can be reached
within as short a time as 2 weeks.
    Since an unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate
adoption of this AD, we determined that notice an opportunity for
public comment before issuing this AD are impracticable and contrary to
the public interest and that good cause exists for making this
amendment effective in less than 30 days.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, and Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

     Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2014-13-04 Columbia Helicopters, Inc. (Type Certificate Previously
Held By Boeing Defense & Space Group) Helicopters: Amendment 39-
17879; Docket No. FAA-2014-0385; Directorate Identifier 2013-SW-079-
AD.

(a) Applicability

    This AD applies to Model 234 helicopters, certificated in any
category.

(b) Unsafe Condition

    This AD defines the unsafe condition as fatigue failure of aft
pylon fitting attach structure combined with aft rotor blade damage.
This condition could result in failure of a fore or aft rotor blade,
vibration, overload of the aft pylon structure at the pylon attach
fittings, departure of the aft pylon, and subsequent loss of control
of the helicopter.

(c) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective July 15, 2014.

(d) Compliance

    You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.

(e) Required Actions

    (1) Within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS):
    (i) Clean and inspect each fore and aft rotor blade for a
defect, damage, or a disbond in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 3.A.(1)(b) through 3.A.(2)(b), of Columbia
Helicopters, Inc., Service Bulletin No. 234-62-0008, Revision 1,
dated December 6, 2013 (SB 234-62-0008).
    (ii) Using a metallic coin or tap hammer, tap inspect each rotor
blade trailing edge for defect, damage, or a disbond in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 3.B.(1) through
3.B.(2)(e) and Figures 1 and 2 of SB 234-62-0008.
    (iii) If there is any defect, damage, or a disbond, repair the
blade before further flight. If the defect, damage, or disbond is
beyond acceptable limits, replace the blade before further flight.
    (2) Within 50 hours TIS and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 100 hours TIS, inspect the aft pylon at the station 534 and
594 tension attachment fittings as follows:
    (i) Dye-penetrant inspect the aft pylon at the attachment
fitting for a crack as shown in Figures 1, 2, and 3 and by following
the Detailed Special Inspection-Dye Penetrant Method, paragraph
2.A.(2) through 2.G.(1), of Columbia Helicopters, Inc. Service
Bulletin No. 234-54-0004, Revision 0, dated November 22, 2013 (SB
234-54-0004).
    (ii) If there is a crack, before further flight, repair or
replace the aft pylon. Figures 2, 3, 4, and 5 of SB 234-54-0004
contain examples of a crack.
    (3) Do not install an aft pylon or a rotor blade until the
requirements of paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this AD are
accomplished.

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, may
approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.

 (g) Subject

    Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 5400 and 6210
Nacelle/Pylon Structure and Main Rotor Blades.

(h) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Columbia Helicopters, Inc., Service Bulletin No. 234-54-
0004, Revision 0, dated November 22, 2013.
    (ii) Columbia Helicopters, Inc., Service Bulletin No. 234-62-
0008, Revision 1, dated December 6, 2013.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Columbia Helicopters, Inc., 14452 Arndt Road NE., Aurora, OR 97002,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, or at http://www.colheli.com/.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663,
Fort Worth, Texas 76137. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 16, 2014.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-14800 Filed 6-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 36 (Friday, February 24, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11509-11510]
[FR Doc No: 2017-03595]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 558

[Docket No. FDA-2016-N-0002]

New Animal Drugs; Withdrawal of Approval of New Animal Drug
Applications

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notification of withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is withdrawing approval
of 18 new animal drug applications (NADAs) and 2 abbreviated new animal
drug applications (ANADAs). These withdrawals of approval of NADAs and
ANADAs for antimicrobial drugs of importance to human medicine that are
administered to food-producing animals in medicated feed are being made
because the products are no longer manufactured or marketed. These
actions are consistent with the FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine's
initiative for the Judicious Use of Antimicrobials.

DATES: Withdrawal of approval is effective February 24, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sujaya Dessai, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV-212), Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is withdrawing approval of 18 NADAs and
2 ANADAs. These applications were identified as being affected by
guidance for industry (GFI) #213, ``New Animal Drugs and New Animal
Drug Combination Products Administered in or on Medicated Feed or
Drinking Water of Food-Producing Animals: Recommendations for Drug
Sponsors for Voluntarily Aligning Product Use Conditions With GFI
#209,'' December 2013 (http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/GuidanceforIndustry/UCM299624.pdf). Their
withdrawal of approval is consistent with the FDA Center for Veterinary
Medicine's initiative for the Judicious Use of Antimicrobials.
    Approval of the following applications for new animal drugs
administered in medicated feed is being voluntarily withdrawn at the
sponsors' requests because these products are no longer manufactured or
marketed:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
          File No.                Product name             Sponsor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
044-820.....................  LINCOMIX              Zoetis Inc.
                               (lincomycin)/AMPROL  333 Portage St.
                               PLUS (amprolium and  Kalamazoo, MI 49007
                               ethopabate).          (Zoetis Inc.).

044-972.....................  LINCOMIX              Zoetis Inc.
                               (lincomycin)/COYDEN
                               (clopidol).
047-261.....................  LINCOMIX              Zoetis Inc.
                               (lincomycin)/DECCOX
                               (decoquinate).
047-262.....................  LINCOMIX              Zoetis Inc.
                               (lincomycin)/DECCOX
                               (decoquinate).
048-954.....................  LINCOMIX              Zoetis Inc.
                               (lincomycin)/ZOAMIX
                               (zoalene).
091-513.....................  STAFAC                Phibro Animal Health
                               (virginiamycin)       Corp., GlenPointe
                               Type A Medicated      Centre East, 3d
                               Article.              floor, 300 Frank W.
                                                     Burr Blvd., Suite
                                                     21, Teaneck, NJ
                                                     07666 (Phibro
                                                     Animal Health
                                                     Corp.).
092-482.....................  LINCOMIX              Zoetis Inc.
                               (lincomycin)/COBAN
                               (monensin).
093-106.....................  LINCOMIX              Zoetis Inc.
                               (lincomycin)/ROBENZ
                               (robenidine).
101-689.....................  LINCOMIX              Zoetis Inc.
                               (lincomycin)/AVATEC
                               (lasalocid).
122-481.....................  STAFAC                Phibro Animal Health
                               (virginiamycin)/      Corp.
                               COBAN (monensin).
122-608.....................  STAFAC                Phibro Animal Health
                               (virginiamycin)/      Corp.
                               AVATEC (lasalocid).
122-822.....................  STAFAC                Phibro Animal Health
                               (virginiamycin)/      Corp.
                               AMPROL PLUS
                               (amprolium and
                               ethopabate).
137-537.....................  LINCOMIX              Zoetis Inc.
                               (lincomycin)/BIO-
                               COX (salinomycin).
138-792.....................  TYLAN (tylosin)/      Zoetis Inc.
                               RUMENSIN (monensin)/
                               MGA (melengestrol
                               acetate).
138-828.....................  STAFAC                Phibro Animal Health
                               (virginiamycin)/BIO-  Corp.
                               COX (salinomycin).
138-904.....................  TYLAN (tylosin)/      Zoetis Inc.
                               BOVATEC (lasalocid)/
                               MGA (melengestrol
                               acetate).
141-110.....................  STAFAC                Phibro Animal Health
                               (virginiamycin)/      Corp.
                               COBAN (monensin).
141-150.....................  STAFAC                Phibro Animal Health
                               (virginiamycin)/      Corp.
                               AVATEC (lasalocid).
200-092.....................  STAFAC                Huvepharma EOOD, 5th
                               (virginiamycin)/      Floor, 3A Nikolay
                               SACOX (salinomycin).  Haytov Str., 1113
                                                     Sophia, Bulgaria
                                                     (Huvepharma EOOD).
200-093.....................  LINCOMIX              Huvepharma EOOD.
                               (lincomycin)/SACOX
                               (salinomycin).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food
and Drugs and redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, and in
accordance with Sec.  514.116 Notice of withdrawal of approval of
application (21 CFR 514.116), notice is given that approval of NADAs
044-820, 044-972, 047-261, 047-262, 048-954, 091-513, 092-482, 093-106,
101-689, 122-481, 122-608, 122-822, 137-537, 138-792, 138-828, 138-904,
141-110, 141-150, 200-092, and 200-093, and all supplements and
amendments thereto, is hereby withdrawn, effective February 24, 2017.
    Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is amending
the animal drug regulations to reflect the voluntary withdrawal of
approval of these applications.

    Dated: February 17, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-03595 Filed 2-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 155 (Friday, August 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 47831]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19616]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2566-003; ER10-2034-003; ER10-2033-004; ER10-
2032-004; ER10-1760-003; ER10-1758-003; ER11-2079-003; ER11-2064-003;
ER11-2069-002; ER11-2066-003; ER10-1329-003; ER12-1502-002; ER12-1504-
002; ER10-1330-003; ER10-1328-001; ER10-2567-002; ER10-1331-001; ER10-
1332-001; ER10-2522-002; ER11-2080-001; ER10-1333-001; ER10-1335-001;
ER10-1325-001.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.
Duke Energy Ohio, Inc., Duke Energy Kentucky, Inc., Carolina Power &
Light Company, Florida Power Corporation, Duke Energy Fayette II, LLC,
Duke Energy Hanging Rock II, LLC, Duke Energy Lee II, LLC, Duke Energy
Washington II, LLC, St. Paul Cogeneration, LLC, Ironwood Windpower,
LLC, Cimarron Windpower II, LLC, North Allegheny Wind, LLC, Happy Jack
Windpower, LLC, Kit Carson Windpower, LLC, Silver Sage Windpower, LLC,
Three Buttes Windpower, LLC, Top of the World Wind Energy, LLC, Duke
Energy Commercial Asset Management, Inc., Duke Energy Commercial
Enterprises, Inc., Duke Energy Retail Sales, LLC, CinCap V, LLC.
    Description: Notice of changes in status of Duke MBR Sellers.
    Filed Date: 8/1/12.
    Accession Number: 20120801-5197.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2237-001.
    Applicants: Dunkirk Power LLC.
    Description: Refiled Motion to Hold Proceeding in Abeyance to be
effective 9/11/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/1/12.
    Accession Number: 20120801-5127.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2377-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
    Description: EAI Marketing Agreement to be effective 10/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/1/12.
    Accession Number: 20120801-5117.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2378-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: 08-01-12 Annual CONE Filing to be effective 6/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 8/1/12.
    Accession Number: 20120801-5125.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2379-000.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Cancellation of Arizona Public Service Company Service
Agreement No. 311 to be effective 10/2/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/1/12.
    Accession Number: 20120801-5172.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2380-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: 08-01-12 Schedule 10 16 17 to be effective 10/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/1/12.
    Accession Number: 20120801-5173.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2381-000.
    Applicants: MP2 Energy NE LLC.
    Description: Market Based Rate Application to be effective 8/2/2012
and Affidavit of Jeff Starcher--Attachment C to Market Based Rate
Application of ME2 Energy NE LLC.
    Filed Date: 8/2/12.
    Accession Number: 20120802-5000; 20120802-5031.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/23/12.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
reliability filings.

    Docket Numbers: RD12-5-000.
    Applicants: North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
    Description: Petition of the North American Electric Reliability
Corporation for Approval of an Interpretation to Reliability Standard
CIP-002-4--Critical Cyber Asset Identification.
    Filed Date: 8/1/12.
    Accession Number: 20120801-5159.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/12.

    Docket Numbers: RD12-6-000.
    Applicants: North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
    Description: Petition of the North American Electric Reliability
Corporation for Approval of an Interpretation to Reliability Standard
CIP-004-4--Personnel and Training.
    Filed Date: 8/1/12.
    Accession Number: 20120801-5198.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/12.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 2, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-19616 Filed 8-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 138 (Thursday, July 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 38733]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15620]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3561-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

Florida; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for
the State of Florida (FEMA-3561-EM), dated July 4, 2021, and related
determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued July 9, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an emergency declaration for
the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following areas
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the
event declared an emergency by the President in his declaration of July
4, 2021.

    Baker, Bradford, Clay, Duval, Nassau, Putnam, and Union Counties
for emergency protective measures (Category B), limited to direct
Federal assistance and reimbursement for mass care including
evacuation and shelter support.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-15620 Filed 7-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P