[Federal Register: September 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 174)]
[Notices]
[Page 52079-52080]
[DOCID:fr08se08-112]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration
(FRA) received a request for temporary waiver of compliance with
certain requirements of its safety standards. The individual petition
is described below, including the parties seeking relief, the
regulatory provisions involved, the nature of the relief being
requested, and the petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.

Norfolk Southern Railway

[Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-2008-0083]

    The Norfolk Southern Railway (NS) has submitted a temporary waiver
petition to support field testing of its processor-based train control
system identified as NS Optimized Train Control (OTC) system, pursuant
to 49 CFR 211.7 and 211.51.
    An informational filing, as required under 49 CFR Part 236, Subpart
H, has also been prepared and submitted in conjunction with this waiver
petition, and can be found in the same docket as this waiver petition.
    The NS OTC Positive Train Control (PTC) system is designed to
assist train crews in situational awareness, prevent authority limit
and over-speed violations, provide open switch protection in non-
signaled Track Warrant Control (TWC) territory, and to prevent equipped
trains from entering the limits, without authorization, of on-track
authority granted to employees.
    NS desires to commence field testing of the NS OTC PTC system on or
after September 1, 2008, or as soon as practicable thereafter,
contingent upon FRA's acceptance and approval of the informational
filing and waiver petition. NS intends to test and develop the NS OTC
PTC system on it's Charleston district between milepost SC7.0
(Charleston Station) and milepost SC128.9 (Andrews Yard Station, as
well as on it's Columbia district between milepost R0.0 Charlotte
Junction station) and milepost R108.5 (Andrews Yard station). During
this initial test phase, NS does not intend to activate the NS OTC PTC
system's locomotive enforcement functionality.
    NS is seeking regulatory relief for development testing and
demonstration purposes only. Specifically, NS is requesting regulatory
relief from the following FRA requirements:
    49 CFR 216.13 (Special Notice for Repairs--Locomotive);
    49 CFR 217.9 (Program of Operational Tests and Inspections--
Recordkeeping);
    49 CFR 217.11 (Program of Instruction on Operating Rules--
Recordkeeping, Electronic Recordkeeping);
    49 CFR Part 218 [Subpart D] (Prohibition against tampering with
safety devices);
    49 CFR 229.7 (Prohibited Acts);
    49 CFR 229.135 (Event Recorders);
    49 CFR 233.9 (Annual Reports);
    49 CFR 235.5 (Changes Requiring Filing of Application);
    49 CFR 240.127 (Criteria for Examining Skill Performance); and
    49 CFR 240.129 (Criteria for Monitoring Operational Performance of
Certified Engineers).
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. All communications
concerning these proceedings should identify the appropriate docket
number (Docket Number FRA-2008-0083) and may be submitted by one of the
following methods:
     Web site: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
    FRA does not anticipate scheduling a public hearing in connection
with these proceedings since the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires an opportunity for oral
comment, they should notify FRA, in writing, before the end of the
comment period and specify the basis for their request.
    Communications received within 30 days of the date of this notice
will be considered by FRA before final action being taken. Comments
received after this period will be considered as far as practicable.
All written communications concerning these proceedings are available
for examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at the
DOT Docket Management Facility, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W12-
140, in Washington DC. All documents in the public docket are also
available for inspection and copying on the internet at http://
www.regulations.gov.
    Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by name of
the individual submitting the

comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78).

    Issued in Washington, DC on September 3, 2008.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. E8-20708 Filed 9-5-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 26194]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09451]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-839-000.
    Applicants: Blue Lake Gas Storage Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2022 Operational Purchases and
Sales Report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 4/26/22.
    Accession Number: 20220426-5182.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-840-000.
    Applicants: Alliance Pipeline L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Various May
1 2022 Capacity Releases to be effective 5/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 4/27/22.
    Accession Number: 20220427-5018.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-841-000.
    Applicants: Florida Southeast Connection, LLC.
    Description: Annual System Balancing Adjustment Filing of Florida
Southeast Connection, LLC.
    Filed Date: 4/26/22.
    Accession Number: 20220426-5102.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-842-000.
    Applicants: ANR Storage Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2022 Operational Purchases and
Sales Report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 4/27/22.
    Accession Number: 20220427-5080.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 27, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-09451 Filed 5-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68902-68903]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21929]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 35027; File No. 812-15404]

Alti Private Equity Access and Commitments Fund and ALTI, LLC

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC'').

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice of an application under section 6(c) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') for an exemption from sections
18(a)(2), 18(c) and 18(i) of the Act and for an order pursuant to
section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act.

Summary of Application:  Applicants request an order to permit certain
registered closed-end management investment companies to issue multiple
classes of shares of beneficial interest with varying sales loads and
to impose early withdrawal charges and asset-based distribution and/or
service fees.

Applicants:  Alti Private Equity Access and Commitments Fund and ALTI,
LLC.

Filing Dates:  The application was filed on November 7, 2022, and
amended on March 28, 2023, June 27, 2023, July 26. 2023, August 18,
2023, and September 15, 2023.

Hearing or Notification of Hearing:  An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing on any application by emailing
the Commission's Secretary at [email protected] and serving the
relevant Applicant with a copy of the request by email, if an email
address is listed for the relevant Applicant below, or personally or by
mail, if a physical address is listed for the relevant Applicant below.
Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on
October 23, 2023, and should be accompanied by proof of service on
Applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate
of service. Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should
state the nature of the writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the
desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason for the request,
and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing
may request notification by emailing the Commission's Secretary at
[email protected].

ADDRESSES: The Commission: [email protected]. Applicants:
Joseph Bonvouloir, [email protected]; Anna T. Pinedo, Esq.,
[email protected]; Brian D. Hirshberg, Esq.,
[email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura J. Riegel, Senior Counsel, or
Kyle R. Ahlgren, Branch Chief, at<PHONE_NUMBER> (Division of
Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For Applicants' representations, legal
analysis, and condition, please refer to Applicants' fifth amended and
restated application, dated September 15, 2023, which may be obtained
via the Commission's website by searching for the file number at the
top of this document, or for an Applicant using the Company name search
field, on the SEC's EDGAR system. The SEC's EDGAR system may be
searched at, at http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/legacy/companysearch.html. You may also call the SEC's Public Reference Room
at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.

    Dated: September 28, 2023.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-21929 Filed 10-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 24, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35698-35701]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15657]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-86410; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2019-023]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Order
Instituting Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 14.11(c) (Index Fund Shares) To
Adopt Generic Listing Standards for Index Fund Shares Based on an Index
of Municipal Securities

July 18, 2019.

I. Introduction

    On April 3, 2019, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``Cboe
BZX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend Cboe BZX Rule 14.11(c) to adopt generic
listing standards for Index Fund Shares (``Shares'') based on an index
or portfolio of municipal securities. The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal Register on April 22, 2019.\3\ On
May 30, 2019, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\4\ the
Commission designated a longer period within which to approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed
rule change.\5\ The Commission has received no comments on the
proposal. The Commission is publishing this order to institute
proceedings pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \6\ to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85656 (Apr. 16,
2019), 84 FR 16753.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85966, 84 FR 26172
(June 5, 2019). The Commission designated July 21, 2019 as the date
by which the Commission shall approve or disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove, the
proposed rule change.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Summary of the Proposed Rule Change 7
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ For a full description of the proposed rule change, see
Notice, supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Cboe BZX Rule 14.11(c) permits the Exchange to list a series of
Shares based on an index or portfolio of underlying securities.
Currently, Cboe BZX Rule 14.11(c) includes generic listing standards
for Shares based on an index or portfolio of equity or fixed income
securities or a combination thereof. Municipal Securities \8\ are a
type of fixed income security, and therefore currently the Exchange may
generically list and trade securities overlying an index or portfolio
of Municipal Securities provided the index or portfolio satisfies the
criteria of Cboe BZX Rule 14.11(c)(4). According to the Exchange,
however, indexes and portfolios of Municipal Securities typically do
not satisfy the criterion that component securities in an index or
portfolio that in aggregate account for at least 75% of the Fixed
Income Securities portion of the weight of the index or portfolio each
have a minimum

original principal amount outstanding of $100 million or more.\9\ The
Exchange states that generally Municipal Securities are issued with
individual maturities of relatively small size, although they typically
are constituents of a much larger municipal bond offering.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The proposed rule defines the term ``Municipal Securities''
by incorporating the definition in Section 3(a)(29) of the Act.
    \9\ See Notice, supra note 3, 84 FR at 16754. ``Fixed Income
Securities are debt securities that are notes, bonds, debentures or
evidence of indebtedness that include, but are not limited to, U.S.
Department of Treasury securities (``Treasury Securities''),
government-sponsored entity securities (``GSE Securities''),
municipal securities, trust preferred securities, supranational debt
and debt of a foreign country or a subdivision thereof.'' Cboe BXZ
Rule 14.11(c)(4).
    \10\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Proposed Cboe BZX Rule 14.11(c)(4)(B)(ii)

1. Applicability
    Proposed Cboe BZX Rule 14.11(c)(4)(B)(ii) provides generic listing
standards for Shares based on an index or portfolio of Municipal
Securities. Because existing Cboe BZX Rule 14.11(c)(4)(B)(i) also
applies to Shares based on an index or portfolio of Municipal
Securities, the Exchange represents that it would apply existing Cboe
BZX Rule 14.11(c)(4)(B)(i) and proposed Cboe BZX Rule
14.11(c)(4)(B)(ii) in a ``waterfall'' manner. Specifically, the
Exchange would initially evaluate every series of Shares based on an
index or portfolio of Municipal Securities or Municipal Securities and
cash against the generic listing standards of existing Cboe BZX Rule
14.11(c)(4)(B)(i) and would apply proposed Cboe BZX Rule
14.11(c)(4)(B)(ii) only to Shares whose index or portfolio does not
meet the requirements of Cboe BZX Rule 14.11(c)(4)(B)(i).
2. Proposed Generic Listing Criteria
    The Exchange asserts that Cboe BZX Rule 14.11(c)(4)(B)(ii) includes
many requirements that are more stringent than those applicable under
Cboe BZX Rule 14.11(c)(4)(B)(i). These heightened requirements,
according to the Exchange, would deter potential manipulation of such
Municipal Securities indices even though the index or portfolio may
include securities that have smaller original principal amounts
outstanding. The proposed quantitative requirements described below
would apply on both an initial and continued basis to a Municipal
Securities index or portfolio underlying a series of Shares.
a. Original Principal Amount Outstanding
    According to the Exchange, Municipal Securities are typically
issued with individual maturities of relatively small size, although
they generally are constituents of a much larger municipal bond
offering.\11\ Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to reduce the
requirement for minimum original principal amount outstanding for
component securities from at least $100 million to at least $5 million.
Further, the Exchange proposes that qualifying securities must have
been issued as part of a transaction of at least $20 million. Lastly,
the Exchange proposes to increase the percentage weight of an index or
portfolio that must satisfy the original principal amount outstanding
requirement from 75% to 90%.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See supra note 10 and accompanying text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange asserts that reducing the minimum original principal
amount outstanding for component securities will not make an index or
portfolio more susceptible to manipulation.\12\ The Exchange argues
that the requirement that component securities in a Municipal
Securities index or portfolio have a minimum principal amount
outstanding, in concert with the other requirements of Cboe BZX Rule
14.11(c)(4)(B)(ii), will ensure that such index or portfolio is
sufficiently broad-based in scope as to minimize potential manipulation
of the index or portfolio.\13\ In addition, the Exchange asserts that
its proposal to require that 90% of the weight of a Municipal
Securities index or portfolio meet the original principal amount
outstanding requirement (as opposed to 75% for existing Cboe BZX Rule
14.11(c)(4)(B)(i)) will further deter potential manipulation by
ensuring that a greater portion of the index or portfolio meets this
minimum size requirement.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Notice, supra note 3, 84 FR at 16754.
    \13\ See id.
    \14\ See id. at 16754-55.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that the Commission has previously approved the
listing and trading of several series of Shares where the underlying
Municipal Securities index or portfolio required that component
securities representing at least 90% of the weight of the index or
portfolio have a minimum original principal amount outstanding of at
least $5 million and have been issued as part of a transaction of at
least $20 million.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84049 (Sept. 6,
2018), 83 FR 46228 (Sept. 12, 2018) (SR-NYSEArca-2018-38) (order
approving, among other things, revisions to the continued listing
criteria applicable to the iShares New York AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

b. Component Concentration
    Cboe BZX Rule 14.11(c)(4)(B)(i), the current generic listing rules
for Shares based on a fixed-income index or portfolio, permits
individual component securities to account for up to 30% of the weight
of such index or portfolio and the top-five weighted component
securities to account for up to 65% of the weight of such index or
portfolio. The Exchange proposes to tighten these thresholds, proposing
that under Cboe BZX Rule 14.11(c)(4)(B)(ii) an individual Municipal
Security may comprise only 10% of the index or portfolio and that the
five most heavily-weighted Municipal Securities in an index or
portfolio may comprise only 30% of the index or portfolio. The Exchange
asserts that its proposal will reduce the susceptibility to
manipulation of a Municipal Securities index or portfolio underlying a
series of Shares.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Notice, supra note 3, 84 FR at 16755.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

c. Issuer Diversification
    The current generic listing rules for Shares based on an index or
portfolio of fixed-income securities require that an index or portfolio
must include securities from at least 13 non-affiliated issuers.
Notably, however, the current rules exempt indices consisting of either
entirely exempted securities or exempted securities and cash from
complying with this diversification requirement.\17\ Therefore, under
the current generic listing criterion, an index or portfolio comprised
of only Municipal Securities (or Municipal Securities and cash) is not
required to satisfy any minimum issuer diversification requirement. The
Exchange proposes that an index or portfolio of Municipal Securities or
Municipal Securities and cash must include securities from at least 13
non-affiliated issuers. The Exchange asserts that requiring such
diversification will reduce the likelihood that an index or portfolio
may be manipulated by ensuring that securities from a variety of
issuers are represented in an index or portfolio of Municipal
Securities.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Municipal Securities are included in the definition of
exempted securities. See Section 3(a)(12) of the Act.
    \18\ See Notice, supra note 3, 84 FR at 16755.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

d. Minimum Number of Components
    The current generic listing requirements for Shares based on an
index or portfolio of fixed-income securities do not have an explicit
requirement that an index or portfolio contain a minimum number of
securities. However, given that such

rules require an index or portfolio to contain securities from at least
thirteen non-affiliated issuers, there is an effective requirement that
an index or portfolio of fixed-income securities contain at least
thirteen component securities. As described above, a fixed-income index
or portfolio comprised of exempted securities (including Municipal
Securities) is not required to satisfy the issuer diversification test,
and therefore such indices need not have a minimum number of component
securities.
    The Exchange proposes to require that a Municipal Securities index
or portfolio contain at least 500 component securities. According to
the Exchange, this proposed requirement will ensure that a Municipal
Securities index or portfolio is sufficiently broad-based and
diversified to make it less susceptible to manipulation.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Proposed Amendments to Cboe BZX Rule 14.11(c)(5)

    The Exchange also proposes to amend Cboe BZX Rule 14.11(c)(5) to
allow the generic listing and trading of Shares based on a combination
of two or more types of indexes, including a combination index that
includes Municipal Securities. Currently, the scope of the rule allows
the Exchange to generically list Shares overlying on a combination of
indexes or an index or portfolio of component securities representing:
(1) The U.S. or domestic equity market; (2) the international equity
market; and (3) the fixed income market. To the extent that an index or
portfolio of Municipal Securities is included in a combination, the
proposed rule specifies the Municipal Securities index or portfolio
must satisfy all requirements of Cboe BZX Rule 14.11(c)(4)(B)(ii). The
Exchange also proposes another conforming change to Cboe BZX Rule
14.11(c)(5) to specify that the current requirements related to index
value dissemination and related continued listing standards will apply
to indexes of Municipal Securities. The Exchange notes that a
combination index or portfolio that includes an index or portfolio of
Municipal Securities will not be permitted to seek to provide
investment results in a multiple of the direct or inverse performance
of such combination index or portfolio.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See Notice, supra note 3, 84 FR at 16756.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove SR-
CboeBZX-2019-023 and Grounds for Disapproval Under Consideration

    The Commission is instituting proceedings pursuant to Section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \21\ to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or disapproved. Institution of such
proceedings is appropriate at this time in view of the legal and policy
issues raised by the proposed rule change. Institution of proceedings
does not indicate that the Commission has reached any conclusions with
respect to any of the issues involved. Rather, as described below, the
Commission seeks and encourages interested persons to provide comments
on the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act,\22\ the Commission is
providing notice of the grounds for disapproval under consideration.
The Commission is instituting proceedings to allow for additional
analysis of the proposed rule change's consistency with Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act, which requires, among other things, that the rules of a
national securities exchange be ``designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade,'' and ``to protect investors and the public
interest.'' \23\ Specifically, the Commission seeks comment regarding
the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ Id.
    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).

    1. The Exchange's current generic listing requirement that at
least 75% of the Fixed Income Securities portion of the weight of an
underlying index or portfolio be comprised of components that each
have a minimum original principal amount outstanding of $100 million
is designed to ensure that adequate information is available about a
substantial portion of the index components.\24\ Do the Exchange'
proposed alternative thresholds for Municipal Securities indexes or
portfolios similarly ensure that adequate information is available
about a majority of the index components? Should one or more
alternative criteria be employed to achieve the objective of the
current generic listing requirement?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ C.f., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55783 (May 17,
2007), 72 FR 29194, 29199 (May 24, 2007) (order approving generic
listing standards for Shares based on fixed income indexes) (``The
Commission believes that [the requirements of Commentary .02] are
reasonably designed to ensure that a substantial portion of any
underlying index or portfolio consists of securities about which
information is publicly available . . .'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Would the Exchange's proposed requirements that the
underlying index or portfolio of Municipal Securities include at
least 500 components from at least 13 non-affiliated issuers
mitigate manipulation concerns? Should one or more alternative
criteria be employed to achieve diversification sufficient to
mitigate manipulation concerns?
    3. Taken collectively, would the proposed generic listing
criteria adequately ensure that each index or portfolio of Municipal
Securities underlying an issue of Shares is not susceptible to
manipulation?

IV. Procedure: Request for Written Comments

    The Commission requests that interested persons provide written
submissions of their views, data, and arguments with respect to the
issues identified above, as well as any other concerns they may have
with the proposal. In particular, the Commission invites the written
views of interested persons concerning whether the proposed rule change
is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) or any other provision of the Act,
or the rules and regulations thereunder. Although there do not appear
to be any issues relevant to approval or disapproval that would be
facilitated by an oral presentation of views, data, and arguments, the
Commission will consider, pursuant to Rule 19b-4 under the Act,\25\ any
request for an opportunity to make an oral presentation.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \26\ Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, as amended by the Securities
Acts Amendments of 1975, Public Law 94-29 (June 4, 1975), grants the
Commission flexibility to determine what type of proceeding--either
oral or notice and opportunity for written comments--is appropriate
for consideration of a particular proposal by a self-regulatory
organization. See Securities Acts Amendments of 1975, Senate Comm.
on Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs, S. Rep. No. 75, 94th Cong., 1st
Sess. 30 (1975).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments regarding whether the proposed rule change should be approved
or disapproved by August 14, 2019. Any person who wishes to file a
rebuttal to any other person's submission must file that rebuttal by
August 28, 2019. The Commission asks that commenters address the
sufficiency of the Exchange's statements in support of the proposal,
which are set forth in Notice,\27\ in addition to any other comments
they may wish to submit about the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ See supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In this regard, the Commission seeks comment on the Exchange's
proposed generic listing standards for Shares based on an index or
portfolio of Municipal Securities. The Commission specifically seeks
comment on whether the proposed requirement that an underlying index or
portfolio must include a minimum of 500 component

Municipal Securities is consistent with the requirement that the rules
of a national securities exchange be ``designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade,'' and ``to protect investors and the public
interest.'' \28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CboeBZX-2019-023 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2019-023. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2019-023 and should be submitted
by August 14, 2019. Rebuttal comments should be submitted by August 28,
2019.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-15657 Filed 7-23-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


List of MODUs and Structure Type ( based on TetraTech MODU list and A. Jones/ ERG analysis to 23 Sep 04 Company Name Region CodStructure Name Sale Pending E Glomar Beaufort Sea 1 Seatanker's Management E SDC Global Santa Fe/ Glomar E Global Santa Fe Glomar R. F. Bauer Glomar E Glomar CR Luigs Glomar E Glomar Explorer Glomar E Glomar Jack Ryan 4 Transocean E Transocean Discoverer Deep Seas 5 Transocean E Transocean Discoverer Enterprise 6 Transocean E Transocean Discoverer Spirit Transocean E Transocean Deepwater Discovery Transocean E Transocean Deepwater Millennium Transocean Sedco Forex E Discoverer 534 Transocean/ Deepwater Drilling LLC E Transocean Deepwater Frontier Blake Workover & Drilling E Blake 1 Blake Workover & Drilling E Blake 3 Blake Workover & Drilling E Blake 7 Blake Workover & Drilling E Blake 8 Blake Workover & Drilling E Blake Rig 12 Blake Workover & Drilling E Blake Rig 14 Blake Workover & Drilling E Blake Rig 15 Blake Workover & Drilling E Blake Rig 16 Blake Workover & Drilling E Blake Rig 17 Blake Workover & Drilling E Blake Rig 18 Blake Workover & Drilling E Blake Rig 19 Blake Workover & Drilling E Blake Rig 20 Blake Workover & Drilling E Blake Rig 23 Blake Workover & Drilling E Blake Rig 24 Blake Workover & Drilling E Blake Rig 4 Blake Workover & Drilling E Blake Rig 5 Blake Workover & Drilling E Blake Rig SD # 1 Blake Workover & Drilling E R& B Falcon 93 BSI Drilling E BSI 1 BSI Drilling E BSI 4 BSI Drilling E BSI 7 Falcon Drilling Company E Falcon Rig 25 Falcon Drilling Company E Falcon Rig 37 Falcon Drilling Company E Falcon Rig 38 Falcon Drilling Company E Falcon Rig 6 Mallard Bay Drilling E Mallard 52 Mallard Bay Drilling E Parker 7 Nabors Offshore E Nabors Barge 201 Nabors Offshore E Sundowner Rig 11 Nabors Offshore E Sundowner Rig 12 Parker Drilling E Mallard 15 Parker Drilling E Parker 12 Parker Drilling E Parker 15 Parker Drilling E Parker 16 Parker Drilling E Parker 17 Parker Drilling E Parker 18 Parker Drilling E Parker 20 Parker Drilling E Parker 21 Parker Drilling E Parker 23 Parker Drilling E Parker 24 Parker Drilling E Parker 25 Parker Drilling E Parker 26 Parker Drilling E Parker 27 Parker Drilling E Parker 28 Parker Drilling E Parker 50 Parker Drilling E Parker 51 Parker Drilling E Parker 57 Parker Drilling E Parker 6 Parker Drilling E Parker 8 Parker Drilling E Parker 9 R& B Falcon E Falcon Rig 4 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 1 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 11 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 15 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 21 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 28 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 29 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 3 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 30 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 31 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 32 Tetra Applied Technology E Tetra Rig 11 Tetra Applied Technology E Tetra Rig 12 Tetra Applied Technology E Tetra Rig 3 Tetra Applied Technology E Tetra Rig 5 Tetra Applied Technology E Tetra Rig 6 Tetra Applied Technology E Tetra Rig 8 Tetra Applied Technology E Tetra Rig 4 Blake Workover & Drilling E Blake Rig 30 Falcon Drilling Company E Falcon Rig 39 Falcon Drilling Company E Falcon Rig 44 Falcon Drilling Company E Falcon Rig 45 Falcon Drilling Company E Falcon Rig 5 Falcon Drilling Company E Falcon Rig 58 Falcon Drilling Company E Falcon Rig 8 Falcon Drilling Company E Wheless 5 Mallard Bay Drilling E Parker 76 NR Marine E NR I Parker Drilling E Parker 53 Parker Drilling E Parker 54 Parker Drilling E Parker 55 Parker Drilling E Parker 56 Parker Drilling E Parker 58 Parker Drilling E Parker 59 R& B Falcon E Big John R& B Falcon E Falcon Rig 2 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon 52 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 10 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 16 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 17 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 27 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 41 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 46 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 47 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 48 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 49 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 54 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 55 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 56 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 57 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 61 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 62 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 63 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 64 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 7 R& B Falcon Inland E Falcon Rig 9 Nabors E Nabors BR 201 Nabors E Nabors 11 Nabors E Nabors 12 ENSCO E ENSCO 55 ENSCO E ENSCO 60 ENSCO E ENSCO 64 ENSCO E ENSCO 67 ENSCO E ENSCO 68 ENSCO E ENSCO 69 ENSCO E ENSCO 81 ENSCO E ENSCO 82 ENSCO E ENSCO 83 ENSCO E ENSCO 84 ENSCO E ENSCO 85 ENSCO E ENSCO 86 ENSCO E ENSCO 87 ENSCO E ENSCO 88 ENSCO E ENSCO 89 ENSCO E ENSCO 90 ENSCO E ENSCO 93 ENSCO E ENSCO 95 ENSCO E ENSCO 98 ENSCO E ENSCO 99 Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Compact Driller Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Galaxy 1 Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Galaxy 2 Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Galaxy 3 Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Galveston Key Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Key Gibraltar Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Key Hawaii Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Key Manhattan Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Key Singapore Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Magellan Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Monarch Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Monitor Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Parameswara Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Rig 103 Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Rig 105 Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Rig 124 Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Rig 127 Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Rig 134 Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Rig 136 Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Rig 141 Global Santa Fe/ Glomar E Global Santa Fe Glomar Adriatic 1 Global Santa Fe/ Glomar E Global Santa Fe Glomar Adriatic 11 Global Santa Fe/ Glomar E Global Santa Fe Glomar Adriatic 5 Global Santa Fe/ Glomar E Global Santa Fe Glomar Adriatic 6 Global Santa Fe/ Glomar E Global Santa Fe Glomar Adriatic 7 Global Santa Fe/ Glomar E Global Santa Fe Glomar Adriatic 8 Global Santa Fe/ Glomar E Global Santa Fe Glomar High Island 5 Global Santa Fe/ Glomar E Global Santa Fe Glomar High Island 7 Global Santa Fe/ Glomar E Global Santa Fe Glomar High Island 9 Global Santa Fe/ Glomar E Global Santa Fe Glomar Labrador 1 7 Noble E Noble Earl Fredrickson Noble E Noble Bill Jennings Noble E Noble Carl Norberg Noble E Noble Eddie Paul Noble E Noble Gene Rosser Noble E Noble John Sandifer Noble E Noble Johnnie Hoffman Noble E Noble Leonard Jones Noble E Noble Sam Noble Noble E Noble Tom Jobe Rowan/ Rowan Companies Inc. E Arch Rowan Rowan/ Rowan Companies Inc. E Cecil Provine Rowan/ Rowan Companies Inc. E Charles Rowan Rowan/ Rowan Companies Inc. E Gilbert Rowe Rowan/ Rowan Companies Inc. E Rowan Alaska Rowan/ Rowan Companies Inc. E Rowan California Rowan/ Rowan Companies Inc. E Rowan Fort Worth Rowan/ Rowan Companies Inc. E Rowan Gorilla II Rowan/ Rowan Companies Inc. E Rowan Gorilla III Rowan/ Rowan Companies Inc. E Rowan Gorilla IV Rowan/ Rowan Companies Inc. E Rowan Halifax Rowan/ Rowan Companies Inc. E Rowan Juneau Rowan/ Rowan Companies Inc. E Rowan Louisiana Rowan/ Rowan Companies Inc. E Rowan Middletown Rowan/ Rowan Companies Inc. E Rowan Odessa Rowan/ Rowan Companies Inc. E Rowan Paris Rowan/ Rowan Drill Inc. E Rowan Texas Rowan/ Rowan International Inc. E Rowan Anchorage Rowan/ Rowan International Inc. E Rowan Houston Rowan/ Rowan International Inc. E Rowan New Orleans Chiles Offshore E Chiles Columbus Chiles Offshore E Chiles Magellen Chiles Offshore E Chiles Tonala Diamond Offshore E Ocean Columbia Diamond Offshore E Ocean King Diamond Offshore E Ocean Nugget Diamond Offshore E Ocean Spartan Diamond Offshore E Ocean Spur Diamond Offshore E Ocean Summit Diamond Offshore E Ocean Titan Diamond Offshore E Ocean Tower Diamond Offshore E Ocean Warwick ENSCO Offshore Company E ENSCO 51 ENSCO Offshore Company E ENSCO 54 ENSCO Offshore Company E ENSCO 94 13 Global Marine Deepwater E Glomar Baltic I 20 Global Marine Deepwater E Glomar Main Pass I 21 Global Marine Deepwater E Glomar Main Pass IV 8 Global Marine Drilling Co. E Glomar Adriatic X 9 Global Marine Drilling Co. E Glomar Adriatic II 10 Global Marine Drilling Co. E Glomar Adriatic III 11 Global Marine Drilling Co. E Glomar Adriatic IV 12 Global Marine Drilling Co. E Glomar Adriatic IX 15 Global Marine Drilling Co. E Glomar High Island I 16 Global Marine Drilling Co. E Glomar High Island II 17 Global Marine Drilling Co. E Glomar High Island III 18 Global Marine Drilling Co. E Glomar High Island IV 19 Global Marine Drilling Co. E Glomar High Island VIII Hercules Offshore E Parker Drilling 14 J Hercules Offshore E Parker Drilling 15 J Marine Drilling Companies E Marine 300 Marine Drilling Companies E Marine 301 Marine Drilling Companies E Marine 303 Marine Drilling Companies E Marine 304 Nabors Offshore E Workhorse IX Noble Drilling Corp E Noble Charles Copeland Noble Mexico E Noble Lewis Dugger Parker Drilling E Parker Drilling 25 J Rowan Companies Inc E Rowan Gorilla VI Rowan Companies Inc E Rowan Gorilla VII Rowan Companies Inc E Rowan Gorilla VIII Transocean Sedco Forex E C E Thornton Transocean Sedco Forex E F G McClintock Transocean Sedco Forex E George H Galloway Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 150 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 151 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 154 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 155 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 156 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 185 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 191 Diamond Offshore E Ocean Champion Diamond Offshore E Ocean Crusader Diamond Offshore E Ocean Drake Hercules Offshore E Odin Victory Hercules Offshore E Parker Drilling 20 J Hercules Offshore E Parker Drilling 21 J Hercules Offshore E Parker Drilling 22 J Marine Drilling Companies E Marine 15 Marine Drilling Companies E Marine 16 Marine Drilling Companies E Marine 17 Marine Drilling Companies E Marine 18 Marine Drilling Companies E Marine 200 Marine Drilling Companies E Marine 201 Marine Drilling Companies E Marine 202 Marine Drilling Companies E Marine 225 Marine Drilling Companies E Marine 3 Marine Drilling Companies E Marine 4 Nabors Offshore E Dolphin 105 Nabors Offshore E Dolphin 106 Nabors Offshore E Dolphin 110 Nabors Offshore E Pool Ranger V Nabors Offshore E Pool Ranger VI Nabors Offshore E Pool Rig 50 Nabors Offshore E Pool Rig 53 Nabors Offshore E Pool Rig 54 Parker Drilling E Parker Drilling 11 J Pride Offshore E Pride Alabama Pride Offshore E Pride Alaska Pride Offshore E Pride Arkansas Pride Offshore E Pride California Pride Offshore E Pride Colorado Pride Offshore E Pride Kansas Pride Offshore E Pride Louisiana Pride Offshore E Pride Mississippi Pride Offshore E Pride New Mexico Pride Offshore E Pride of Texas Pride Offshore E Pride Oklahoma Pride Offshore E Pride Utah Pride Offshore E Pride Wyoming R& B Falcon E RBF 202 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 100 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 152 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 153 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 190 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 192 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 200 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 201 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 203 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 204 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 205 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 206 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 207 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 250 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 251 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 252 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 253 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 254 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 256 ENSCO E ENSCO 26 Caspian Drilling Company E Global Santa Fe Dada Gorgud Caspian Drilling Company E Global Santa Fe Istigal ENSCO E ENSCO 7500 Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Aleutian Key Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe Jutlander Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe SF 135 Global Santa Fe E Global Santa Fe SF 140 Global Santa Fe/ Glomar E Global Santa Fe Glomar Arctic 3 Global Santa Fe/ Glomar E Global Santa Fe Glomar Arctic 4 Global Santa Fe/ Glomar E Global Santa Fe Glomar Grand Banks Noble E Noble Amos Runner Noble E Noble Homer Ferrington Noble E Noble Jim Thompson Noble E Noble Max Smith Noble E Noble Paul Romano Rowan E Rowan Midland 1 Transocean E Transocean Deepwater Horizon 2 Transocean E Transocean Deepwater Nautilus 23 Transocean E Transocean Marianas Transocean E Falcon 100 Transocean E Transocean Cajun Express Transocean E Transocean Henry Goodrich Transocean E Transocean Rather Transocean E Transocean Richardson Transocean E Transocean Sedco Energy Transocean E Transocean Sedco Express Drillmar E Ocean Zephyr II Atwood Deep Seas E Atwood Hunter Atwood Oceanics E Sea Scout Diamond Offshore E Ocean Ambassabor Diamond Offshore E Ocean America Diamond Offshore E Ocean Century Diamond Offshore E Ocean Concord Diamond Offshore E Ocean Confidence Diamond Offshore E Ocean Endeavor Diamond Offshore E Ocean Lexington Diamond Offshore E Ocean New Era Diamond Offshore E Ocean Prospector Diamond Offshore E Ocean Quest Diamond Offshore E Ocean Rover Diamond Offshore E Ocean Saratoga Diamond Offshore E Ocean Star Diamond Offshore E Ocean Valiant Diamond Offshore E Ocean Victory Diamond Offshore E Ocean Voyager Diamond Offshore E Ocean Worker Energy Equipment Resources E Odin Millennium Enserch Exploration E Ensearch Garden Banks 14 Global Marine Drilling Co. E Glomar Celtic Sea 22 Global Marine North Sea Inc E Glomar Arctic I Marine Drilling Companies E Marine 700 Noble International E Noble Clyde Boudreaux Ocean Rig ASA E Leiv Eriksson Ocean Rig ASA E Eirik Raude Pride International E Viking Transocean Sedco Forex E C. Kirk Rhein Jr Transocean Sedco Forex E Cajun Express Transocean Sedco Forex E Transocean 96 Transocean Sedco Forex E Transocean 97 Transocean Sedco Forex E Transocean Amirante Workships BV E Amethyst IV Workships BV E Amethyst V Atwood Oceanics E Richmond Noble E Noble Joe Alford Noble E Noble Lester Pettus Noble Drilling US E Noble Fri Rodli Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 75 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 77 Transocean Sedco Forex E RBF 78 ENSCO E ENSCO 25 ENSCO E ENSCO 29 to delete duplicates)

Structure Type Arctic Sub Arctic Sub Drillship Drillship Drillship Drillship Drillship Drillship Drillship Drillship Drillship Drillship Drillship I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Barge I Jackup I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible I Submersible Inland Barge Drilling Rig Inland Barge Workover Rig Inland Barge Workover Rig Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup Jackup JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M JU / M Platform Rig on SPAR Buoy Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Submersible Semi Tender Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Semisub Submersible Submersible Submersible Submersible Submersible Submersible Submersible Transportable Platform Rig Transportable Platform Rig


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 95 (Thursday, May 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28942-28943]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11700]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2013-0029]

Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), this document provides the public notice that by a document
received on March 19, 2013, the North Shore Railroad Company (NSHR) has
petitioned the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for a waiver of
compliance from certain provisions of the Federal railroad safety
regulations contained at 49 CFR Part 223, Safety Glazing Standards-
Locomotives, Passenger Cars and Cabooses. FRA assigned the petition
Docket Number FRA-2013-0029.
    NSHR petitioned FRA to grant a waiver of compliance from the safety
glazing provisions of 49 CFR 223.15, Requirements for existing
passenger cars. NSHR seeks this relief for a 1953 M500-type coach car,
Number ORRX 4885, which is being purchased from a private owner,
Ontario Rail (ORRX). NSHR intends to use ORRX 4885 in excursion, VIP,
and shipper service on tracks owned by the Susquehanna Economic
Development Authority-Council of Governments (SEDA-COG) Joint Rail
Authority, and the Union County Industrial Railroad. The component
railroads in SEDA-COG include the Nittany and Bald Eagle Railroad (72
miles), the Lycoming Valley Railroad (34 miles), the North Shore
Railroad Company (NSHR, 38 miles), and the Shamokin Valley Railroad (25
miles). NSHR intends to operate on two additional lines: approximately
5 miles on the Milton Branch owned by the West Shore Railroad
Corporation, and approximately 10 miles that the Lewisburg and Buffalo
Creek Railroad owns on the Winfield Branch. The ORRX 4885 will be
operated at a maximum timetable track speed authorized by each of the
railroads mentioned above, but not to exceed 50 mph.
    ORRX 4885 has 24 side windows and no end windows. Sixteen side
windows are 28'' x 66'' and eight are 28'' x 26''. Each window has
dual-pane-style laminated safety glazing (plated outside and laminated
inside). None of the windows open; however, the two emergency exit
windows on each end of the car are clearly marked and have hammers
mounted on them to break out glazing under emergency conditions. ORRX
4885 is also equipped with flashlights, other battery-powered lighting,
and an axe.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation's Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE.,
W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Operations Facility is open
from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in

connection with these proceedings since the facts do not appear to
warrant a hearing. If any interested party desires an opportunity for
oral comment, they should notify FRA, in writing, before the end of the
comment period and specify the basis for their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
     Web site: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
    Communications received by July 1, 2013 will be considered by FRA
before final action is taken. Comments received after that date will be
considered as far as is practicable.
    Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the document,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
See http://www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice for the privacy notice
of regulations.gov or interested parties may review DOT's complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 13, 2013.
Robert C. Lauby,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Regulatory and Legislative
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013-11700 Filed 5-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register: March 15, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 50)]
[Notices]
[Page 14007-14009]
[DOCID:fr15mr11-66]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0199; FRL-9280-6]

Notice of Receipt of Petition From the Government of Canada for
Application of the Renewable Fuel Standard Aggregate Compliance
Approach

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is issuing notice of receipt of a petition for EPA to
authorize the use of an aggregate approach for compliance with the
Renewable Fuel Standard renewable biomass provisions. This petition was
submitted by the Government of Canada. The petition requests that EPA
determine that an aggregate compliance approach will provide reasonable
assurance that

planted crops and crop residue from Canada meet the definition of
renewable biomass. EPA has previously determined that the aggregate
compliance approach is applicable in the United States. If the petition
is approved, crops and crop residue from Canada would not be subject to
individual recordkeeping and reporting requirements. This determination
could change if EPA later determined, through its annual evaluation of
the aggregate compliance approach, that the number of acres of
agricultural land in Canada exceeded a baseline number of acres
determined to be available under the Act for the production of crops
and crop residue meeting the definition of renewable biomass. In this
notice, EPA is soliciting comment on all aspects of the petition.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 16, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2011-0199, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Air and Radiation Docket, Environmental Protection
Agency, Mailcode: 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC
20460. Please include a total of two copies.
     Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room, EPA
West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20460. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal
hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2011-0199. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://
www.regulations.gov. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: The complete petition and all supporting materials are
available for public review in the docket. All documents in the docket
are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in
hard copy at the Air and Radiation Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is
(202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the Air and Radiation
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Meg McCarthy, Office of Transportation
and Air Quality, Mailcode: 6406J, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:
(202)343-9968; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

(A) Request for Comments

    On January 31, 2011, the Government of Canada submitted a petition
to the Administrator pursuant to 40 CFR 80.1457 requesting approval of
an aggregate approach for compliance with the Renewable Fuel Standard
renewable biomass provisions for planted crops and crop residue from
Canada. This petition has been placed in the public docket.
    The petition requests that EPA determine that an aggregate
compliance approach will provide reasonable assurance that planted
crops and crop residue from Canada meet the definition of renewable
biomass and will continue to meet the definition of renewable biomass,
and thus will not be subject to individual recordkeeping and reporting
requirements unless EPA determines through an annual evaluation that
more acres are planted to crops and crop residue than are permissible
consistent with the definition of renewable biomass. EPA solicits
comments and information to assist the Administrator in making a
determination concerning the petition.

(B) Background on the Petition Process

    Pursuant to 40 CFR 80.1457, EPA may approve a petition for
application of the aggregate compliance approach in a foreign country
if it finds that such an approach will provide reasonable assurance
that planted crops and crop residue from the petitioning country meet
the definition of renewable biomass, and will continue to meet the
definition of renewable biomass, as demonstrated through the submission
of credible, reliable, and verifiable data. As part of its evaluation
of the petition, EPA will consider several factors, including:
     Whether there has been a reasonable identification of the
``2007 baseline area of land,'' defined as the total amount of
cropland, pastureland, and land that is equivalent to U.S. Conservation
Reserve Program land in the country in question that was actively
managed or fallow and nonforested on December 19, 2007, taking into
account the definitions of terms such as ``cropland,'' ``pastureland,''
``planted crop,'' and ``crop residue'' included in the final RFS2
regulations.
     Whether information on the total amount of cropland,
pastureland, and land that is equivalent to U.S. Conservation Reserve
Program land in the country in question for years preceding and
following calendar year 2007 shows that the 2007 baseline area of land
is not likely to be exceeded in the future.
     Whether economic considerations, legal constraints,
historical land use and agricultural practices and other factors show
that it is likely that producers of planted crops and crop residue will
continue to use agricultural land within the 2007 baseline area of land
identified into the future, as opposed to clearing and cultivating land
not included in the 2007 baseline area of land.
     Whether there is a reliable method to evaluate, on an
annual basis, if the

2007 baseline area of land is being or has been exceeded.
     Whether a credible and reliable entity has been identified
to conduct data gathering and analysis, including annual identification
of the aggregate amount of cropland, pastureland, and land that is
equivalent to U.S. Conservation Reserve Program land, that is needed
for an annual EPA evaluation of the aggregate compliance approach, and
whether the data, analyses, and methodologies are publicly available.
     Whether the petition submission requirements specified in
40 CFR 80.1457(b) have been satisfied, including the submission of a
letter signed by a national government representative at the
ministerial level or equivalent confirming that the petition and all
supporting data have been reviewed and verified by the ministry (or
ministries) or department(s) of the national government with primary
expertise in agricultural land use patterns, practices, data, and
statistics of the country in question, that the data support a finding
that planted crops and crop residue from the specified country meet the
definition of renewable biomass and will continue to meet the
definition of renewable biomass, and that the responsible national
government ministry (or ministries) or department(s) will review and
verify the data submitted on an annual basis to facilitate EPA's annual
assessment of the 2007 baseline area of land.
    The public is specifically invited to comment on these factors,
whether Canada has met all submission requirements specified in the
regulations, and on any other issue that could inform EPA's evaluation
of the petition.

    Dated: March 10, 2011.
Margo Tsirigotis Oge,
Director, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Office of Air and
Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2011-6033 Filed 3-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


                      US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                          HUMAN STUDIES REVIEW BOARD
                       APRIL 2011 PUBLIC MEETING AGENDA

                         Holiday Inn National Airport
                         2650 Jefferson Davis Highway
                             Arlington, VA 22202

                           Wednesday, April 13, 2011

9:00 AM*	Convene Public Meeting and Review Administrative Procedures  -  Mr. Jim Downing (Designated Federal Officer [DFO], EPA Human Studies Review Board, Office of the Science Advisor [OSA])
           Introduction and Identification of Board Members  -  Dr. Sean Philpott (HSRB Chair)
	Welcome - Dr. Warren Lux (Director of the Program in Human Research
	Ethics, OSA, EPA)
	Opening Remarks  -  Steven Bradbury, Ph.D. (Director, Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP), Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, EPA)
	Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Follow-up on Previous HSRB Recommendations  -  Mr. William Jordan (OPP, EPA)

Session 1:	Completed AHETF research on exposure of workers applying pesticide sprays using open-cab airblast equipment.

9:30 AM 	EPA Science and Ethics Reviews  -  Mr. Matthew Crowley (OPP, EPA) and Ms. Kelly Sherman (OPP, EPA)
10:30 AM 	Board Questions of Clarification  -  Dr. Sean Philpott (HSRB Chair)
11:00 AM 	Public Comments
11:15 AM	Break
11:30 AM	Board Discussion - Science

Charge to the Board:

    Was the research reported in the Agricultural Handler Exposure Task Force (AHETF) completed monograph report and associated field study reports faithful to the design and objectives of the protocol, SOPs, and governing documents?
    Has EPA adequately characterized, from a scientific perspective, the limitations on these data that should be considered when using the data in estimating exposure of those who apply pesticides with open cab airblast equipment?

12:15 PM	Board Discussion - Ethics

Charge to the Board:

    Does available information support a determination that the studies were conducted in substantial compliance with subparts K and L of 40 CFR Part 26?

12:45 PM	Lunch

Session 2:	A published report (Gulson et al. 2010) of an intentional exposure human study measuring dermal absorption of zinc oxides contained in sunscreens.

1:30 PM	EPA Science and Ethics Reviews  -  Dr. Jessica Ryman (OPP, EPA) and Ms. Laura Parsons (OPP, EPA)
2:15 PM	Board Questions of Clarification  -  Dr. Sean Philpott (HSRB Chair)
2:45 PM	Public Comments
3:00 PM	Board Discussion - Science

Charge to the Board:

    Is the Gulson et al. (2010) study scientifically sound, providing reliable data?
    If so, is the Gulson et al. (2010) study relevant for qualitative use in support of an assessment of the absorption of zinc oxide through the skin?

3:45 PM	Break

4:00 PM	Board Discussion - Ethics

Charge to the Board:

    Is there adequate information to determine that the Gulson et al. (2010) study was conducted in substantial compliance with procedures at least as protective as those in subparts A - L of EPA's regulation at 40 CFR Part 26?

Session 3:	Reconsideration of two concerns previously raised by the HSRBin its June 2009 review of an intentional human dosing study withchlorpyrifos (Kisicki et al., 1999); additional pertinent information wasmade available by the sponsor related to these two concerns.

4:30 PM	Introduction of Topic - Dr. Sean Philpott (HSRB Chair)
4:45 PM	Board Discussion  -  Science

Issues for Discussion:

    Do the recommendations provided by the HSRB at its June 2009 meeting and in its subsequent report regarding the reliability of data on the urinary metabolite trichloropyridinol in the Kisicki et al. (1999) study change in light of the new information provided?

    Do the recommendations provided by the HSRB at its June 2009 meeting and in its subsequent report regarding the level of absorption of chlorpyrifos in the Kisicki et al. (1999) study change in light of the new information provided?

5:30 PM	Adjournment

US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                          HUMAN STUDIES REVIEW BOARD
                       APRIL 2011 PUBLIC MEETING AGENDA

                         Holiday Inn National Airport
                         2650 Jefferson Davis Highway
                             Arlington, VA 22202

                           Thursday, April 14, 2011

10:00 AM*	Convene Public Meeting  -  Mr. Jim Downing (DFO, HSRB, OSA)
	Introduction and Identification of Members  -  Dr. Sean Philpott (HSRB Chair)
	Follow-up from Previous Day  -  Mr. William Jordan (OPP, EPA)

Session 1:	Completed AEATF research on exposure of professional janitorial workers when wiping indoor surfaces with an antimicrobial pesticide.

10:15 AM	EPA Science and Ethics Reviews  -  Mr. Timothy Leighton (OPP, EPA) and Ms. Kelly Sherman (OPP, EPA)
11:00 AM	Board Questions of Clarification  -  Dr. Sean Philpott (HSRB Chair), EPA, Principal Investigator/Sponsor
11:30 AM	Public Comments
11:45 AM	Board Discussion - Science

Charge to the Board:

    Was the research reported in the Antimicrobial Exposure Assessment Task Force II (AEATF) completed wipe study report faithful to the design and objectives of the protocol and governing documents of AEATF?
    Has EPA adequately characterized, from a scientific perspective, the limitations on these data that should be considered when using the data in estimating exposure of those who clean indoor surfaces with antimicrobial pesticides using a trigger-bottle and wipes or ready-wipes?

12:30 PM	Board Discussion - Ethics

    Is the research likely to meet the applicable requirements of 40 CFR part 26, subparts K and L?

1:00 PM	Adjournment


[Federal Register: February 25, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 38)]
[Notices]
[Page 10631-10633]
[DOCID:fr25fe11-89]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63934; File No. SR-NYSE-2011-04]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend the Exchange Price List

February 18, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on February 14, 2011, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE''
or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its 2011 Price List (``Price List'')
for equity

transactions by revising the description of the Risk Management Gateway
(``RMG'') fee to clarify that the charge is determined on the basis of
the capacity of the end user's connection in inbound messages per
second, rather than the actual number of inbound messages. The text of
the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange, the Commission's
Public Reference Room, http://www.sec.gov, and http://www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List for equity
transactions by revising the description of the RMG fee to clarify that
the charge is determined on the basis of the capacity of the end user's
connection in inbound messages per second, rather than the actual
number of inbound messages.
    On February 12, 2009, the Exchange filed a proposed rule change
with the Commission that established the fee for its RMG service to
facilitate the ability of Sponsoring Member Organizations to monitor
and oversee the sponsored access activity of their Sponsored
Participants.\4\ In the Original RMG Fee Filing, the Exchange
established a fee of $3,000 per month for the first ``Connection'' plus
$1,000 per month for each additional ``Connection.'' A ``Connection''
was defined as up to 1,000 messages per second inbound, regardless of
the connection's actual capacity.\5\ Consequently, if a particular end
user's connection has the capacity to support 3,000 messages per second
inbound, that end user's connection will be deemed to be three (3)
Connections and the charge will be $5,000 per month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59430 (February 20,
2009), 74 FR 9014 (February 27, 2009) (File No. SR-NYSE-2009-15)
(the ``Original RMG Fee Filing'').
    \5\ Original RMG Fee Filing, 74 FR at 9015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Although it is clear from the Original RMG Fee Filing that the key
variable in determining an end user's RMG fee is the capacity in
messages per second inbound that the end user's connection will support
(i.e., the number of Connections), the descriptive language that was
added to the Price List at that time was inartfully worded and could be
misinterpreted as basing the monthly RMG fee on the actual number of
inbound messages. Consequently, the Exchange is proposing to modify the
descriptive language for the RMG fee in the Price List to clarify that
the fee is based on message capacity. There will be no change to the
pricing itself or the basis on which it is currently calculated.
    The Exchange notes that NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca''), in a rule
filing with the Commission on September 4, 2009,\6\ established a fee
for its RMG service that is exactly the same as the Exchange's RMG fee,
including the computation of the fee based on message capacity. In the
NYSE Arca RMG Fee Filing, the descriptive language that was added to
the NYSE Arca Fee Schedule describes much more clearly and
unambiguously the basis on which the RMG fee is calculated and the
Exchange proposes to replace the current descriptive language in its
Price List with the corresponding language from the NYSE Arca Fee
Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60664 (September 14,
2009), 74 FR 48110 (September 21, 2009) (File No. SR-NYSEArca-2009-
81) (the ``NYSE Arca RMG Fee Filing'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\7\ in general, and Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\8\ in
particular, in that it is designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its
members and other persons using its facilities. The Exchange believes
that the proposal does not constitute an inequitable allocation of
fees, since there will be no change to the current RMG fee which has
been in effect since February 2009, or how it is calculated, only to
the description of the fee for the purposes of adding clarity regarding
the basis and calculation of the fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \9\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-
4 \10\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge
imposed by the NYSE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2011-04 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2011-04. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the

submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with
respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission,
and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change
between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be
withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received
will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make publicly available. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2011-04 and should be submitted on
or before March 18, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-4226 Filed 2-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 225 (Friday, November 20, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74486-74487]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25699]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0060]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of New Approval of Information Collection: Pilot Professional
Development

AGENCY: (FAA), DOT

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval for a new information collection.
The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments on the following collection of information was published on
October 7, 2016 (81FR69908). A second 60-day Federal Register Notice
was published on September 29, 2020 (85FR61083). The collection
involves the development and approval of new and revised training
curriculum for certificate holders using part 121 pilot training and
qualification programs.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by December 21, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be
addressed to the attention of the Desk Officer, Department of
Transportation/FAA, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget,

Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sheri Pippin by email at:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public Comments Invited: You are asked to
comment on any aspect of this information collection, including (a)
Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for FAA's
performance; (b) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA
to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information
collection; and (d) ways that the burden could be minimized without
reducing the quality of the collected information. The agency will
summarize and/or include your comments in the request for OMB's
clearance of this information collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-XXXX.
    Title: Pilot Professional Development.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Type of Review: New collection.
    Background: The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the following collection of information
was published on October 7, 2016 (81FR69908). A second 60-day Federal
Register Notice was published on September 29, 2020 (85FR61083). This
action amends the requirements primarily applicable to air carriers
conducting domestic, flag, and supplemental operations to enhance the
professional development of pilots in those operations. This action
requires air carriers conducting domestic, flag, and supplemental
operations to provide new-hire pilots with an opportunity to observe
flight operations and become familiar with procedures before serving as
a flightcrew member in operations; to revise the upgrade curriculum;
and to provide leadership and command and mentoring training for all
pilots in command. This final rule will mitigate incidents of
unprofessional pilot behavior and reduce pilot errors that can lead to
a catastrophic event.
    Summary: The final rule requires the development and approval of
new and revised training curriculums for the following:
     Leadership and command and mentoring ground training for
pilots currently serving as PIC (Sec.  121.429) and recurrent PIC
leadership and command and mentoring training (Sec. Sec.  121.409(b)
and 121.427);
     Leadership and command training and recurrent leadership
and command training for pilots serving as SIC in operations that
require three or more pilots (Sec.  121.432(a));
     Upgrade training curriculum requirements (Sec. Sec.
121.420 and 121.426);
     Part 121 appendix H requirements; and
     Approval of Qualification Standards Document for
certificate holders using an Advanced Qualification Program (AQP)
(Sec.  121.909).
    The final rule also requires some additional recordkeeping related
to maintaining records of pilots completing the following:
     Leadership and command and mentoring ground training for
pilots currently serving as PIC (Sec.  121.429);
     Leadership and command training and recurrent leadership
and command training for pilots serving as SIC in operations that
require three or more pilots (Sec.  121.432(a));
     Recurrent PIC leadership and command and mentoring ground
training (Sec.  121.427); and
     Operations familiarization for new-hire pilots (Sec.
121.435).
    Use: This information will be used to ensure safety-of-flight by
making certain that adequate training is obtained and maintained by
those who operate under part 121. The FAA will review the respondents'
training programs and training courseware through routine
certification, inspection and surveillance of certificate holders using
part 121 pilot training and qualification programs to ensure compliance
and adherence to regulations and, where necessary, to take enforcement
action.
    Respondents: As of February 2017, there were 79 certificate holders
who use part 121 pilot training and qualification programs. They
collectively employed 39,122 PICs and 42,227 SICs.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion. Responses will
vary based on type of operation.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 206 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 9,614 Hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 17, 2020.
Sandra L. Ray,
Aviation Safety Inspector, FAA Policy Integration Branch, AFS-270.
[FR Doc. 2020-25699 Filed 11-19-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 26, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 74427]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25879]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER17-105-000]

Broadview Energy JN, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Broadview Energy JN, LLC`s application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is November 7, 2016.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 18, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-25879 Filed 10-25-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 503-504]
[FR Doc No: 2019-28441]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-10003-89-Region 9]

Public Water System Supervision Program Revision for the State of
Nevada

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of tentative approval.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the State of Nevada revised its
approved Public Water System Supervision (PWSS) Program under the
federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) by adopting the Lead & Copper
Rule Minor and Short-Term Revisions. The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has determined that these revisions by the State of Nevada
are no less stringent than the corresponding Federal regulations and
otherwise meet applicable SDWA primacy requirements. Therefore, the EPA
intends to approve these revisions to the State of Nevada's PWSS
Program.

DATES: Request for a public hearing must be received on or before
February 5, 2020.

ADDRESSES: All documents relating to this determination are available
for inspection between the hours of 8:30

a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except official State
holidays and official Federal holidays, at the following offices:
Nevada Department of Environmental Protection, Admin Office, 901 South
Stewart Street, Suite 4001, Carson City, NV 89701; United States
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, Drinking Water Section, 75
Hawthorne Street (WTR4-1), San Francisco, CA 94105.
    Documents relating to this determination are also available online
at https://ndep.nv.gov/posts/category/public-notices for inspection.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacob Jenzen, EPA Region 9, Drinking
Water Section, at the Region 9 address provided above; via telephone at
(415) 972-3570; or via email address at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Background. The EPA approved the State of Nevada's original
application for PWSS program primary enforcement authority on February
27, 1978 (43 FR 8030). Primacy states such as Nevada must adopt and
submit for approval to EPA all new and revised national primary
drinking water regulations. Since that initial approval, EPA has worked
with Nevada to review and approve various revisions to Nevada's primacy
program. For the revisions covered by this action, the EPA promulgated
revisions to the Federal Lead and Copper Rule with the Minor Revisions
on January 12, 2000 (65 FR 1950) and the Short-Term Revisions on
October 10, 2007 (72 FR 5778). Nevada originally incorporated by
reference the requirements of the federal Lead and Copper Rule, 40 CFR
part 141 Subpart I, directly into the Nevada Administrative Code (NAC),
and EPA approved those revisions on July 21, 1996 (61 FR 29748). Nevada
updated the NAC with a rulemaking made effective July 22, 2010 that
expanded the incorporation by reference of the Federal Lead and Copper
Rule to include the Minor and Short-Term Revisions, with language
sufficient to meet the federal requirements. These are the primacy
revisions that the EPA Region 9 tentatively approves as part of the
Nevada's PWSS Program.
    Public Process. Any interested party may request a public hearing
on this determination. A request for a public hearing must be submitted
by February 5, 2020, to the Regional Administrator of EPA Region 9, to
the address shown above. The Regional Administrator may deny frivolous
or insubstantial requests for a hearing. If a substantial request for a
public hearing is made by February 5, 2020, EPA Region 9 will hold a
public hearing. Any request for a public hearing shall include the
following information: 1. The name, address, and telephone number of
the individual, organization, or other entity requesting a hearing; 2.
A brief statement of the requesting person's or organization's interest
in the Regional Administrator's determination and a brief statement of
the information that the requesting person intends to submit at such
hearing; and 3. The signature of the individual making the request, or,
if the request is made on behalf of an organization or other entity,
the signature of a responsible official of the organization or other
entity.
    If EPA Region 9 does not receive a timely and substantive request
for a hearing and the Regional Administrator does not elect to hold a
hearing on his own motion, the determination at issue in this notice,
the EPA's approval shall become final and effective on February 5,
2020, and no further public notice will be issued.

    Authority:  Section 1413 of the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42
U.S.C. 300g-2 (1996), and 40 CFR part 142 of the National Primary
Drinking Water Regulations.

    Dated: December 17, 2019.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA, Region 9.
[FR Doc. 2019-28441 Filed 1-3-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P