Meeting Notes -- norflurazon focus meeting
4/11/2013--With Syngenta
Topics Discussed:
   * Registration review schedule: reg review docket opened Sept 2012; FWP published March 2013; DCI expected to be issued December 2013

   * Syngenta provided label use and use rate clarifications and proposed to make potential label changes early in the process (i.e., removing farmstead uses, clarifying DFUs, and improved application directions).  There is a concern that if Syngenta revises their labels now, they may have to revise the labels again when registration review mitigation goes into effects several years from now.  But since norflurazon is unique in that there is only one registrant and a few registered products, the best time for revising the labels may be about 6-12 months before the publication of the Preliminary Risk Assessment.

   * Syngenta intends to submit additional sales data to EPA.

   * Syngenta proposed potential approaches for geospatial analysis; EPA stressed that if Syngenta could tease out the geography of norflurazon use on a crop/use basis, then that would be helpful for the risk assessment.

   * Syngenta proposed potential approaches for exposure refinements (including a probabilistic static pond modeling approach, use of PRZM runoff flux when modeling terrestrial plant exposure, and the need to characterize flow when modeling flowing water bodies); EPA stated that it was in the process of developing a new model approach for estimating terrestrial plant exposure.  EPA stressed that the shift to the new model would not take place right away.

   * Syngenta proposed potential tools/approaches for risk characterization ( e.g., use of species sensitivity distributions and incorporation of probabilistic statistical techniques); EPA agreed that these approaches may be useful and stated that while the tools/approaches that Syngenta discussed are the direction of risk characterization, the Agency is not yet using them.

   * Syngenta asked if EPA's science divisions were willing to look at proposed label changes and evaluate its effects on risk picture before such changes are submitted to RD.  EPA said it was willing to look at proposed label changes for norflurazon since norflurazon has only one technical registrant and a couple labels, but its ability to do so may be limited by time constraints and workload.  EPA stated that the process for implementing label changes as part of registration review was still being worked out.


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68187-68188]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21790]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-98565; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2023-070]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule
Change To List and Trade Shares of the ARK 21Shares Ethereum ETF Under
BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares

September 27, 2023.
    On September 6, 2023, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to list and trade shares of the ARK 21Shares
Ethereum ETF under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares.
The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal
Register on September 27, 2023.\3\ The Commission has received no
comments on the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98467 (Sept. 21,
2023), 88 FR 66515.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change
is November 11, 2023. The Commission is extending this 45-day time
period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that it has
sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change and the issues
raised therein. Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act,\5\ designates December 26, 2023, as the date by
which the Commission shall either approve or disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule
change (File No. SR-CboeBZX-2023-070).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-21790 Filed 10-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 184 (Monday, September 23, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49726-49727]
[FR Doc No: 2019-20505]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG19-183-000.
    Applicants: Airport Solar LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Airport Solar LLC.
    Filed Date: 9/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190917-5065.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: EG19-184-000.
    Applicants: Heart of Texas Wind, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Heart of Texas Wind, LLC.
    Filed Date: 9/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190917-5069.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: EG19-185-000.
    Applicants: Isabella Wind, LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator
Status of Isabella Wind, LLC.
    Filed Date: 9/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190917-5073.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/8/19.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1928-002.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: 3290R2 Sholes Wind GIA--Amended
Filing to be effective 4/25/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/16/19.
    Accession Number: 20190916-5132.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2446-002.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: 2019-09-17_SA 3332, Southern Indiana
Gas & Electric-OSER 2nd Sub GIA (J783) to be effective 7/10/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190917-5094.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2448-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.,
MidAmerican Energy Company.
    Description: Supplement to July 24, 2019, Midcontinent Independent
System Operator, Inc. tariff filing (Replacement Tab C ? Revised
Exhibit B).
    Filed Date: 9/16/19.
    Accession Number: 20190916-5182.

    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2508-001.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: 3215R6 People's Electric Cooperative
NITSA NOA--Amended to be effective 7/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190917-5107.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2817-000.
    Applicants: FirstEnergy Solutions Corp.
    Description: Compliance filing: Informational Filing re Planned
Transfer [original record in ER15-1510-002] to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 9/16/19.
    Accession Number: 20190916-5164.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2818-000.
    Applicants: Upper Missouri G. & T. Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Formula Rate Filing to be
effective 11/15/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/16/19.
    Accession Number: 20190916-5172.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2819-000.
    Applicants: Sierra Pacific Power Company.
    Description: Initial rate filing: Service Agreement No. 19-00049 to
be effective 11/16/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/16/19.
    Accession Number: 20190916-5173.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2820-000.
    Applicants: Upper Missouri G. & T. Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Initial Filing of Rate
Schedules FERC Nos. 1 through No. 11 to be effective 11/15/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/16/19.
    Accession Number: 20190916-5176.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2821-000; TS19-4-000.
    Applicants: Upper Missouri G. & T. Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Request for Waiver of Open-Access Requirements of
Order Nos. 888, et al. of Upper Missouri G. & T. Electric Cooperative,
Inc.
    Filed Date: 9/16/19.
    Accession Number: 20190916-5185.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2822-000.
    Applicants: Airport Solar LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for Market-Based
Rate Authority to be effective 11/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190917-5063.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2823-000.
    Applicants: Isabella Wind, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Isabella Wind, LLC MBR
Application Filing to be effective 11/15/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190917-5090.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2824-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-09-17_SA 3180 Dunns
Bridge Solar-NIPSCO 1st Rev GIA (J643 J847) to be effective 8/30/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190917-5095.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/8/19.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES19-54-000.
    Applicants: Georgia Power Company.
    Description: Application under Section 204 of the Federal Power Act
for Authorization to Issue Securities of Georgia Power Company.
    Filed Date: 9/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190917-5077.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/8/19.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 17, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-20505 Filed 9-20-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 69 (Thursday, April 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19897-19898]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08039]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 659-028]

Notice of Application Accepted for Filing, Soliciting Comments,
Motions To Intervene, and Protests: Crisp County Power Commission

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Non-capacity License Amendment.
    b. Project No.: 659-028.
    c. Date Filed: March 5, 2014.
    d. Applicant: Crisp County Power Commission.
    e. Name of Project: Lake Blackshear Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Flint River, in Worth, Lee, Sumter, Dooly, and
Crisp counties, Georgia.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contacts: Mr. Steve Rentfrow, General Manager, Crisp
County Power Commission, 202 South 7th Street, P.O. Box 1218, Cordele,
GA 31010,<PHONE_NUMBER>, and Mr. David Montgomery Moore, Balch &
Bingham LLP, 30 Ivan Allen Jr. Blvd. NW., Suite 700, Atlanta, GA 30308,
(404) 962-3530.
    i. FERC Contact: Mr. Jeremy Jessup,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and
protests, is 30 days from the issuance date of this notice by the
Commission. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing.
Please file comments, motions to intervene, and protests using the
Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000
characters without prior registration using the eComment system at
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your
name and contact information at the end of your comments. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper copy to:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should include
docket number P-659-028.
    k. Description of Request: The applicant proposes to amend Article
403 of its existing license to revise the reservoir drawdown period for
consistency with historically low flows in the Flint River. Article 403
requires the applicant to conduct a biennial lake drawdown from
November 1 to December 15. The applicant is proposing fixed dates for
the new biennial draw down period to allow sufficient time to conduct
the necessary activities of the aquatic plant control program, dock
repair, and shoreline maintenance. The applicant is proposing to
commence drawdown on November 1 and begin refill on

December 15. No other characteristics of the drawdown would change.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits
in the docket number field to access the document. You may also
register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to
be notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-208-3676 or email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is
also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item
(h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Motions to Intervene, and Protests: Anyone may submit
comments, a motion to intervene, or protests in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, motions to
intervene, or protests must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filing must (1)
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``MOTION TO
INTERVENE'', or ``PROTEST'' as applicable; (2) set forth in the heading
the name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise
comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, motions to intervene, or protests must set forth their
evidentiary basis and otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR
4.34(b). All comments, motions to intervene, or protests should relate
to project works which are the subject of the amendment application.
Agencies may obtain copies of the application directly from the
applicant. A copy of any motion to intervene or protest must be served
upon each representative of the applicant specified in the particular
application. If an intervener files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency. A copy of all other
filings in reference to this application must be accompanied by proof
of service on all persons listed in the service list prepared by the
Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and
385.2010.

    Dated: April 3, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-08039 Filed 4-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Attachment A Proposed Regulations Title 13, California Code Regulations, Section 1971, Engine Manufacturer Diagnostic System Requirements for 2007 and Subsequent Model Year Heavy Duty Engines ( EMD) 1 § 1971. Engine Manufacturer Diagnostic System Requirements 2007 and Subsequent Model Year Heavy Duty Engines ( a) PURPOSE The purpose of this regulation is to establish requirements for engine manufacturer diagnostic systems ( EMD systems) that are installed on 2007 and subsequent model year engines and other powertrain components certified for sale in heavyduty vehicles in California. The EMD systems, through the use of a computer( s), shall monitor emission systems in use for the actual life of the engine and shall be capable of detecting malfunctions of the monitored emission systems, illuminating a malfunction indicator light ( MIL) to notify the vehicle operator of detected malfunctions, and storing diagnosis information regarding the detected malfunctions.

( b) APPLICABILITY Except as specified elsewhere in this regulation ( title 13, CCR section 1971), all 2007 and subsequent model year on road heavy duty engines shall be equipped with an EMD system and shall meet all applicable requirements of this regulation ( title 13, CCR section 1971). 1 For purposes of this regulation, " engine" shall refer to powertrain components ( e. g., engine, transmission, hybrid) that are utilized in heavy duty vehicles.

( c) DEFINITIONS ( 1) " Actual life" refers to the entire period that an engine is operated on public roads in California up to the time an engine is retired from use. ( 2) " Deactivate" means to turn off, shutdown, desensitize, or otherwise make inoperable through software programming or other means during the actual life of the engine. ( 3) " Functional check" for an output component or system means verification of proper response of the component and system to a computer command. ( 4) " Heavy duty vehicle" means any motor vehicle having a gross vehicle weight rating greater than 14,000 pounds. ( 5) " Key on, engine off position" refers to a vehicle with the ignition key in the engine run position ( not engine crank or accessory position) but with the engine not running. ( 6) " Malfunction" means any deterioration or failure of a component that causes the performance to be outside of the applicable limits in section ( e). ( 7) " Manufacturer" includes producers of engines, transmissions, other powertrain components, chassis, or coaches for use in heavy duty vehicles and includes others involved in the assembly or modification of heavy duty vehicles prior to being registered for on road use. ( 8) " On road heavy duty engine" means an engine certified to the requirements of title 13, CCR sections 1956.1 or 1956.8 or a powertrain component designed for use with such an engine.

1 Unless otherwise noted, all section references refer to section 1971 of title 13, CCR. 2 ( 9) " Rationality fault diagnostic" for an input component means verification of the accuracy of the input signal while in the range of normal operation and when compared to all other available information.

( d) GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ( 1) The EMD System. ( A) If a malfunction is present as specified in section ( e), the EMD system shall detect the malfunction. ( B) The EMD system shall provide diagnostic information to service and repair technicians to identify detected malfunctions. ( C) The EMD system shall be designed to operate, without any required scheduled maintenance, for the actual life of the engine in which it is installed and may not be programmed or otherwise designed to deactivate based on age and/ or mileage of the vehicle during the actual life of the engine. This section is not intended to alter existing law and enforcement practice regarding a manufacturer's liability for an engine beyond its useful life, except where an engine has been programmed or otherwise designed so that an EMD system deactivates based on age and/ or mileage of the engine. ( 2) MIL Requirements. ( A) MIL Specifications. 1. The MIL shall be of sufficient illumination and location to be readily visible under all lighting conditions. The MIL, when illuminated, shall display a phrase or icon determined by the manufacturer to be likely to cause the vehicle operator to seek corrective action. In lieu of a dedicated MIL, manufacturers may utilize an existing warning light( s) to also satisfy the requirements of the MIL. 2. The MIL shall illuminate in the key on, engine off position before engine cranking to indicate that the MIL is functional. This functional check of the MIL is not required during vehicle operation in the key on, engine off position subsequent to the initial engine cranking of an ignition cycle ( e. g., due to an engine stall or other non commanded engine shutoff). ( B) Illuminating the MIL. Once a malfunction has been detected, the EMD system shall illuminate the MIL in accordance with the manufacturer's existing practices for notifying vehicle operators and service technicians. ( C) Extinguishing the MIL. Once the MIL has been illuminated, it may be extinguished upon the EMD system determining that the malfunction is no longer present provided no other malfunction has been detected that would independently illuminate the MIL according to the requirements outlined above. ( 3) Monitoring Conditions. Manufacturers shall define monitoring conditions for detecting malfunctions identified in section ( e) and for determining if malfunctions no longer exist.

( e) MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ( 1) FUEL SYSTEM MONITORING ( A) Requirement: The EMD system shall monitor the fuel delivery system. 3 ( B) Malfunction Criteria: If the engine is equipped with feedback control of the fuel pressure, the EMD system shall detect a malfunction of the fuel system when the feedback control system has used up all of the adjustment allowed by the manufacturer and cannot achieve the desired fuel pressure.

( 2) EXHAUST GAS RECIRCULATION ( EGR) SYSTEM MONITORING ( A) Requirement: The EMD system shall monitor the EGR system on engines so equipped. ( B) Malfunction Criteria: 1. Low Flow: The EMD system shall detect a malfunction of the EGR system when the system has reached its control limits such that it cannot increase EGR flow to achieve the commanded flow rate. 2. High Flow: The EMD system shall detect a malfunction of the EGR system when the system has reached its control limits such that it cannot reduce EGR flow to achieve the commanded flow rate.

( 3) PARTICULATE MATTER ( PM) TRAP MONITORING ( A) Requirement: The EMD system shall monitor the PM trap on engines soequipped ( B) Malfunction Criteria: 1. Excessive Backpressure: The EMD system shall detect a malfunction when the PM trap fails to regenerate, clogs, or otherwise malfunctions such that it causes the backpressure in the exhaust system to exceed the manufacturer's specified limits for operation. 2. Missing substrate: The EMD system shall detect a malfunction if either the PM trap substrate is completely destroyed, removed, or missing, or if the PM trap assembly is replaced with a straight pipe.

( 4) EMISSION RELATED ELECTRONIC COMPONENT MONITORING ( A) Requirement: The EMD system shall monitor for malfunction any electronic powertrain component/ system that either provides input to ( directly or indirectly) or receives commands from the on board computer( s), and: ( 1) is defined by the manufacturer as emission related, or ( 2) is used as part of the diagnostic strategy for any other emission related monitored system or component. ( B) Malfunction Criteria: 1. Input Components: Where determined by the manufacturer to be feasible given existing hardware and software, the EMD system shall detect malfunctions of input components caused by a lack of circuit continuity, out of range values, and rationality faults. 2. Output Components/ Systems: Where determined by the manufacturer to be feasible given existing hardware and software, the EMD system shall detect a malfunction of an output component/ system when proper functional response of the component and system to computer commands does not occur or when a lack of circuit continuity or circuit fault occurs ( e. g., short to ground or high voltage). 4 ( f) CERTIFICATION The Executive Officer shall grant certification for the EMD system upon the manufacturer submitting the following certification information: ( 1) A description of the functional operation of the EMD system. ( 2) A listing of all electronic powertrain input and output signals ( including those not monitored by the EMD system) that identifies which signals are monitored by the EMD system.

( g) DEFICIENCIES The Executive Officer may certify EMD systems installed on engines even though the systems do not comply with one or more of the requirements of title 13, CCR section 1971. In granting the certification, the Executive Officer shall consider the following factors: the extent to which the requirements of section 1971 are satisfied overall based on a review of the engine applications in question, the relative performance of the resultant EMD system compared to systems fully compliant with the requirements of section 1971, and a demonstrated good faith effort on the part of the manufacturer to: ( 1) meet the requirements in full by evaluating and considering the best available monitoring technology; and ( 2) come into compliance as expeditiously as possible. Manufacturers shall not be subject to limitations on the number of granted deficiencies nor subject to fines for granted deficiencies.

NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43000.5, 43013, 43018, 43100, 43101, and 43104, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002, 39003, 39010 39060, 39515, 39600 39601, 43000, 43000.5, 43004, 43006, 43013, 43016, 43018, 43100, 43101, 43102, 43104, 43105, 43105.5, 43106, 43150 43156, 43204, 43211, and 43212, Health and Safety Code.


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 52 (Monday, March 18, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 9724]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04658]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 13

[Docket No.: FAA-2017-1051; Notice No. 10-86]
RIN 2120-AL00

Update to Investigative and Enforcement Procedures; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting an NPRM published on February 12, 2019.
In that document, the FAA proposed to amend its regulations to the
procedural rules governing Federal Aviation Administration
investigations and enforcement actions. This document corrects two
errors in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of that document
and one error in the footnote of the ``Subpart A--General Authority To
Re-Delegate and Investigative Procedures'' section of that document.

DATES: The comment period for the proposed rule published February 12,
2019, at will close May 13, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions concerning this action
regarding 14 CFR part 13, subparts A through C, E, and F, contact
Jessica E. Kabaz-Gomez, Office of the Chief Counsel, AGC-300, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC
20591; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
Cole R. Milliard, Office of the Chief Counsel, AGC-300, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC
20591; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For
questions concerning this action regarding 14 CFR part 13, subpart D
and G, contact John A. Dietrich, Office of the Chief Counsel, FAA
Office of Adjudication, AGC-70, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For questions concerning this action
regarding 14 CFR part 13, subpart G, you may also contact Marie
Collins, Office of the Chief Counsel, Office of Adjudication, AGC-70,
800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-
3522; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On February 12, 2019, the FAA published an NPRM entitled, ``Update
to Investigative and Enforcement Procedures'' (84 FR 3614).
    In that NPRM the FAA proposed to amend its regulations to the
procedural rules governing Federal Aviation Administration
investigations and enforcement actions. The proposed revisions include
updates to statutory and regulatory references, updates to agency
organizational structure, elimination of inconsistencies, clarification
of ambiguity, increases in efficiency, and improved readability.
    In the NPRM, the incorrect attorney is listed as the contact person
for subpart G and another attorney was not identified as additional
contact person for subpart G. The footnote discussing the proposed
changes to 14 CFR 13.1 incorrectly identifies a FAA Order. This
document corrects these errors to accurately reflect the contact
information for questions concerning 14 CFR part 13, subpart G and the
FAA Order referenced.

Correction

    In FR Doc. 2019-00771, Vol. 84, No. 29, beginning on page 3614 in
the Federal Register of February 12, 2019, make the following
corrections:
    1. On page 3614, in the second column, in the first paragraph under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT correct ``For questions concerning this
action regarding 14 CFR part 13, subpart D, contact John A. Dietrich''
to read ``For questions concerning this action regarding 14 CFR part
13, subpart D and G, contact John A. Dietrich'' and correct ``For
questions concerning this action regarding 14 CFR part 13, subpart G,
contact Vicki S. Leemon, Office of the Chief Counsel, Office of
Adjudication, AGC-70, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>to read ``For
questions concerning this action regarding 14 CFR part 13, subpart G,
you may also contact Marie Collins, Office of the Chief Counsel, Office
of Adjudication, AGC-70, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC
20591; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    2. On Page 3617, in the first column, in the footnotes, correct
``FAA Order 1150.154A'' to read FAA Order 1100.154A''.

    Issued On: March 4, 2019.
Lirio Liu,
Executive Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2019-04658 Filed 3-15-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request U. S. Environmental Protection Agency / Office of Water / OGWDW 2. OMB control number b.

None a. 2040 3. Type of information collection ( check one) a.

New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c. G Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a.

Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes X No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a.

Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: / /___

7. Title Information Collection Request: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and Copper; Final Rule 8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) EPA ICR # 1912.01 9. Keywords Environmental protection, lead, copper, national primary drinking water regulations 10. Abstract The National Primary Drinking Water Regulations ( NPDWRs) for Lead and Copper ( The Lead and Copper Rule or LCR), promulgated by EPA in 1991, is a regulatory program mandated by the Safe Drinking Water Act ( SDWA). The LCR's goal is to reduce the levels of lead and copper at the tap to as close to the maximum contaminant level goals of 0 parts per billion ( ppb) of lead and 1.3 ppb of copper as possible. To accomplish this, the LCR requires community and non transient non community water systems to optimize corrosion control and, under specified conditions, install source water treatment, conduct public education, and/ or replace lead service lines in the distribution system. The Lead and Copper Rule Minor Revisions ( LCRMR) eliminate unnecessary requirements, streamline and reduce reporting burden, and promote consistent national implementation. The LCRMR do not affect the lead or copper rule maximum contaminant level goals, action levels, or the basic regulatory requirements.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. Farms b.

Business or other for profit e.

Federal Government c.

Not for profit institutions f. P State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. G Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. P Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 76,001 b. Total annual responses 159,929 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 63% c. Total hours requested 2,431,728 hours d. Current OMB inventory 0 hours e. Difference 2,431,728 hours________________ f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 2,431,728 hours_____ ________ 2. Adjustment 0 hours 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars)

a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs $ 0 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) $ 14,026 c. Total annualized cost requested $ 14,026 ____ d. Current OMB inventory $ 0 e. Difference $ 14,026 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change $ 14,026 _ 2. Adjustment $ 0 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ Application for benefits e. __ Program planning or management b. __ Program evaluation f. __ Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. _ P_ Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a.

Recordkeeping b.

Third party disclosure c.

Reporting 1. Q On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4.

Quarterly 5.

Semi annually 6.

Annually 7. Q Biannually 8.

Other ( describe) biweekly, triennially, every 9 yrs 17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes

No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Judith Lebowich Phone: 202 260 7595 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, 1 certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with' 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3): ( I) Why the information is being collected' ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( I) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Official Cynthia C. Dougherty, Director, OGWDW Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Joseph Retzer, Director Regulatory Information Division Office of Regulatory Management and Information/ OP Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95 Certification Requirement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions 5 CFR 1320.9 reads " As part of the agency submission to OMB of a proposed collection of information, the agency ( through the head of the agency, the Senior Official or their designee) shall certify ( and provide a record supporting such certification) that the proposed collection of information

"( a) is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including that the information to be collected will have practical utility;

"( b) is not unnecessarily duplicative of information otherwise reasonably accessible to the agency;

"( c) reduces to the extent practicable and appropriate the burden on persons who shall provide information to or for the agency, including with respect to small entities, as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U. S. C. § 601( 6)), the use of such techniques as:

"( 1) establishing differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to those who are to respond; "( 2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting requirements; or collection of information , or any part thereof; "( 3) an exemption from coverage of the collection of information, or any part thereof;

"( d) is written using plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology and is understandable to those who are to respond;

"( e) is to be implemented in ways consistent and compatible, to the maximum extent practicable, with the existing reporting and recordkeeping practices of those who are to respond;

"( f) indicates for each recordkeeping requirement the length of time persons are required to maintain the records specified;

"( g) informs potential respondents of the information called for under § 1320.8( b)( 3); [ see below]

"( h) has been developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected, including the processing of the information in a manner which shall enhance, where appropriate, the utility of the information to agencies and the public;

"( I) uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology appropriate to the purpose for which the information is to be collected; and "( j) to the maximum extent practicable, uses appropriate information technology to reduce burden and improve data quality, agency efficiency and responsiveness to the public."

NOTE: 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3) requires that each collection of information:

"( 3) informs and provides reasonable notice to the potential persons to whom the collection of information is addressed of: "( I) the reasons the information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( ii) the way such information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( iii) an estimate, to the extent practicable, of the average burden of the collection ( together with a request that the public direct to the agency any comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden); "( iv) whether responses to the collection of information are voluntary, required to obtain or retain a benefit ( citing authority), or mandatory ( citing authority); "( v) the nature and extent of confidentiality to be provided, if any ( citing authority); and "( vi) the fact that any agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number."

OMB 83 I ( Instructions) 10/ 95