[Federal Register: August 5, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 151)]
[Notices]
[Page 45436-45437]
[DOCID:fr05au08-53]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0081; FRL-8700-9]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Prevention of Significant
Deterioration and Non-Attainment Area New Source Review (Renewal), EPA
ICR Number 1230.23, OMB Control Number 2060-0003

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. This ICR is scheduled to expire on October 31,
2008. Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or
sponsor the collection of information while this submission is pending
at OMB. This ICR describes the nature of the information collection and
its estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before September 4,
2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OAR-2004-0081, to (1) EPA on-line at www.regulations.gov, or by mail
to: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center, Air and
Radiation Docket and Information Center, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Mail Code 2822T, Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB at: Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carrie Wheeler, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Air Quality Policy Division (C504-05), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711;
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On November 30, 2007 (72 FR 67720), EPA sought comments on
this ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. EPA
completed an active consultation with the National Association of Clean
Air Agencies (NACAA) in January, 2008. Three comments were received and
EPA has addressed the comments.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0081, which is available for online viewing at
www.regulations.gov, or in-person viewing at the Air and Radiation
Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA
West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The EPA
Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for
the Air Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at
www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once
in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing in www.regulations.gov as EPA receives
them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted
material, confidential business information (CBI), or other information
whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For further
information about the electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov.
    Title: Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Non-Attainment
Area New Source Review (Renewal).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR No. 1230.23, OMB Control No. 2060-0003.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on October 31, 2008.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed by publication in
the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such as on the
related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The display of
OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is consolidated in 40
CFR part 9.
    Abstract: Part C of the Clean Air Act (Act)--``Prevention of
Significant Deterioration,'' and Part D--``Plan Requirements for
Nonattainment Areas,'' require all States to adopt preconstruction
review programs for new or modified stationary sources of air
pollution. In addition, the provisions of Section 110 of the Act
include a requirement for States to have a preconstruction review
program to manage the emissions from the construction and modification
of any stationary source of air pollution to assure that the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) are achieved and maintained.
Implementing regulations for these three programs are promulgated at 40
CFR 51.160 through 51.166 to Part 51 and 40 CFR 52.21 and 52.24.
    In order to receive a construction permit for a major new source or
major modification, the applicant must

conduct the necessary research, perform the appropriate analyses and
prepare the permit application with documentation to demonstrate that
their project meets all applicable statutory and regulatory NSR
requirements. Specific activities and requirements are listed and
described in the Supporting Statement for the ICR.
    Reviewing authorities review the permit application, provide for
public review of the proposed project, and issue the permit based on
its consideration of all technical factors and public input. The EPA,
more broadly, reviews a fraction of the total applications and audits
the state and local programs for their effectiveness. Consequently,
information prepared and submitted by the source is essential for the
source to receive a permit, and for Federal, state and local
environmental agencies to adequately review the permit application and
thereby properly administer and manage the NSR programs.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to be broken
down as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      Type of permit action                          Major PSD     Major Part D        Minor
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of sources...............................................             282             519          74,591
Burden Hours per Response:
    Industry....................................................             866             642              40
    Permitting Agencies.........................................             301             127              30
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements;
train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Industrial plants, state and local
permitting agencies.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 150,821.
    Frequency of Response: 1 per respondent.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 5,951,068 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $486,452,000, which includes
$475,056,000 annual labor costs and $11,396,000 annual capital/startup
and O&M costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an increase of 44,960 in the
total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of
Approved ICR Burdens. The number of respondents has increased by 51 due
to the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC. Circuit to
vacate the Clean Units and Pollution Control Project Exclusion
provisions of the NSR program. In addition, the burden per permit for
Part C major NSR permit applications increased based on active
consultation with NACAA, conducted in January 2008.

    Dated: July 29, 2008.
Sara Hisel-McCoy,
 Director, Collections Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E8-17927 Filed 8-4-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: July 11, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 132)]
[Notices]
[Page 37809-37811]
[DOCID:fr11jy07-134]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-56008; File No. SR-NSX-2007-07]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Change To Modify a Rule Relating to Market Data Revenue Credits
for Transactions Executed Through NSX BLADE

July 3, 2007.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 18, 2007, the National Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NSX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change, as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the Exchange.
The Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change on June
29, 2007. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comment
on the proposed rule change from interested persons and is approving
the proposal as modified by Amendment No. 1 on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is proposing to amend Exchange Rule 16.2(b) to
increase its tape credits from 50 percent to 100 percent of market data
revenues generated by transactions in Tape A, Tape B, and Tape C
securities and to clarify that the Exchange will not provide any tape
credits for market data revenue generated by quotes. The text of the
proposed rule change is available at the NSX, the Commission's Public
Reference Room, and http://www.nsx.com/RulesFilings.asp.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item III below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Exchange Rule 16.2(b) currently provides for a 50 percent
transaction credit on revenues generated by transactions in Tape A,
Tape B, and Tape C securities, using the Exchange's NSX
BLADE.SM The credit is allocable to ETP Holders on a pro
rata basis based upon Tape A, Tape B, and Tape C revenue generated by
an ETP Holder's transactions on the Exchange. The Exchange derives the
funds for these credits from payments it receives from the joint
industry plans that allocate market data revenues to self-regulatory
organizations (``SROs''). Prior to April 1, 2007, the formula to
calculate market data revenue was based solely on the trading activity
of an SRO. As of April 1, 2007, the market data formulas under the
joint industry plans that allocate market data revenues to SROs were
changed by Regulation NMS.\3\ The joint industry plans' formula for
market data revenue is now a new two-step process: First, distributable
plan market data revenues are allocated among individual securities
(symbol-by-symbol); and, second, revenues that are allocated to an
individual security are allocated among the SROs such that 50% of the
revenue is attributable to transactions on an SRO

and 50% is attributable to certain types of quoting activity on an
SRO.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 17 CFR 242.600 to 242.612. See also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 53829 (May 18, 2006) 71 FR 30038 (May 24, 2006).
    \4\ The Allocation Amendment to the CTA, CQ, and the Nasdaq UTP
Plans contains the market data formula respecting quotes. In
general, Quote Credits can be earned for each second of time (with a
minimum of one second) multiplied by the dollar value of size that
an automated best bid or offer is submitted to the plan processors
that is equal to the NBBO, provided the quote does not lock or cross
a previously displayed automated quotation. See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496 (June 29, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With the instant proposed rule change, the Exchange is proposing
that Exchange Rule 16.2(b) be amended to increase from 50% to 100% the
percentage of Tape A, Tape B, and Tape C revenue shared with its ETP
Holders that is based on reporting transactions in securities on the
Exchange. The Exchange is also proposing to clarify explicitly in
Exchange Rule 16.2(b) its present practice of not providing any credit
to ETP Holders with respect to market data revenue that is based on
their reporting quotes of securities in the Exchange's system.
    In addition, simultaneous with the implementation of this proposed
rule change, the Exchange intends to harmonize its pro rata
calculations of its credits to ETP Holders with the new Market Data
formula under Regulation NMS to reflect the symbol-by-symbol and other
components of the allocation of the Trading Share portion of the
formula. Thus, the Exchange will begin providing credits to ETP Holders
for market data revenue for transactions executed through the Exchange
based on a pro rata distribution of the market data revenue actually
generated by such ETP Holder's transactions in individual securities,
as opposed to a pro rata distribution of that ETP Holder's total
trading activity in a particular tape.
    The Exchange has determined that this change is necessary for
competitive reasons. The increase of the trade market data revenue
credits to 100% will allow the Exchange to offer a more competitive
program to its current and potential ETP Holders. The Exchange's
retention of market data revenue based upon reporting quotes will be
included in the Exchange's general operating revenues which are used to
fund, among other things, the Exchange's regulatory oversight
functions.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest because it
lowers the cost of trading and market data to broker-dealers and the
investing public and because it enhances competition in the trading of
Tape A, Tape B and Tape C securities.
    Beginning with the Exchange's second quarter of 2007, which began
April 1st and ends June 30th, the Exchange intends to calculate its
quarterly market data credits owed to its ETP Holders in accordance
with the proposed rule change.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6(b) of the Act,\5\ in general, and
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\6\ in particular, in that it is designed to
provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any inappropriate burden on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

III. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File No. SR-NSX-2007-07 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NSX-2007-07. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NSX-2007-07 and should be
submitted on or before August 1, 2007.

IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
Proposed Rule Change

    After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange,\7\ and, in particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b)
of the Act \8\ and the rules and regulations thereunder. The Commission
finds that the Exchange's proposal to increase its tape credits is
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\9\ which requires, among
other things, that exchanges have an equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees, and other charges among their members and issuers and other
persons using their facilities. The Commission further notes that the
Exchange's proposal to harmonize its market data revenue credit program
with the new formula under Regulation NMS is consistent with the
promotion of a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ In approving this rule, the Commission notes that it has
considered its impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds good cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of
the Act,\10\ for approving the proposed rule change prior to the 30th
day after the date of publication of the notice of the

filing thereof in the Federal Register. The Commission believes that
granting accelerated approval would facilitate the undelayed increase
in the distribution of the market data revenue to ETP Holders and allow
the Exchange to offer a more competitive market data revenue credit
program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act
\11\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NSX-2007-07), as modified by
Amendment No. 1, is hereby approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-13399 Filed 7-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 222 (Thursday, November 17, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 81003-81006]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27628]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0675]
RIN 1625-AA87

Security Zone; Potomac River and Anacostia River, and Adjacent
Waters; Washington, DC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a series of security zones in
the National Capital Region (NCR) on specified waters of the Potomac
River and Anacostia River, and adjacent waters during increased
security events. This action is necessary to prevent terrorist acts and
incidents immediately before, during, and after events held within the
NCR, whenever such an event exists, as determined by the Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region. This rule prohibits vessels and
persons from entering the security zone and requires vessels and
persons in the security zone to depart the security zone, unless
specifically exempt under the provisions in this rule or granted
specific permission from the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Maryland-
National Capital Region. The regulations will enhance the safety and
security of persons and property within the Nation's Capital, while
minimizing, to the extent possible, the impact on commerce and
legitimate waterway use.

DATES: This rule is effective December 19, 2016.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0675 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Ronald L. Houck, at Sector Maryland-National Capital
Region Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 410-
576-2674, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On September 2, 2016, the Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled ``Security Zone; Potomac River and
Anacostia River, and adjacent waters; Washington, DC'' in the Federal
Register (81 FR 60663). There we stated why we issued the NPRM, and
invited comments on our proposed regulatory action related to this
security zone. During the comment period that ended November 1, 2016,
we received no comments.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The COTP determined that it is necessary to establish a series of
security zones within the NCR. The purpose of these security zones is
to ensure the safety of vessels and the relevant navigable waters
before, during, and after the event.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule

    As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM published on
September 2, 2016. There are no changes in the regulatory text of this
rule from the proposed rule in the NPRM.
    This rule establishes a series of security zones on specified
waters of the Potomac River, Anacostia River and adjacent waters. The
security zones cover specified navigable waters within the NCR whenever
an event that requires increased security is taking place. The duration
of the zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these
navigable waters before, during, and after the event. No vessel or
person would be permitted to enter the security zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The COTP
Maryland-National Capital Region will notify the maritime community,
via

Broadcast Notice to Mariners (BNM), of the location and duration of the
security zone as the increased security event dictates. The security
zone established for a specific increased security event will consist
of one or more of the security zones categorized below.
    Security zone one includes all navigable waters of the Potomac
River, from shoreline to shoreline, bounded to the north by the Francis
Scott Key (US-29) Bridge, at mile 113, and bounded to the south by a
line drawn from the Virginia shoreline at Ronald Reagan Washington
National Airport, at 38[deg]51'21.3'' N., 077[deg]02'00.0'' W.,
eastward across the Potomac River to the District of Columbia shoreline
at Hains Point at position 38[deg]51'24.3'' N., 077[deg]01'19.8'' W.,
including the waters of the Boundary Channel, Pentagon Lagoon,
Georgetown Channel Tidal Basin, and Roaches Run. Events that typically
require enforcement of the zone include activities associated with the
U.S. Presidential Inauguration and State funerals for former Presidents
of the U.S.
    Security zone two includes all navigable waters of the Anacostia
River, from shoreline to shoreline, bounded to the north by the John
Philip Sousa (Pennsylvania Avenue) Bridge, at mile 2.9, and bounded to
the south by a line drawn from the District of Columbia shoreline at
Hains Point at position 38[deg]51'24.3'' N., 077[deg]01'19.8'' W.,
southward across the Anacostia River to the District of Columbia
shoreline at Giesboro Point at position 38[deg]50'52.4'' N.,
077[deg]01'10.9'' W., including the waters of the Washington Channel.
Events that typically require enforcement of the zone include
activities associated with the U.S. Presidential Inauguration and State
funerals for former Presidents of the U.S.
    Security zone three includes all navigable waters of the Potomac
River, from shoreline to shoreline, bounded to the north by a line
drawn from the Virginia shoreline at Ronald Reagan Washington National
Airport, at 38[deg]51'21.3'' N., 077[deg]02'00.0'' W., eastward across
the Potomac River to the District of Columbia shoreline at Hains Point
at position 38[deg]51'24.3'' N., 077[deg]01'19.8'' W., thence southward
across the Anacostia River to the District of Columbia shoreline at
Giesboro Point at position 38[deg]50'52.4'' N., 077[deg]01'10.9'' W.,
and bounded to the south by the Woodrow Wilson Memorial (I-95/I-495)
Bridge, at mile 103.8. Events that typically require enforcement of the
zone include activities associated with the U.S. Presidential
Inauguration and State funerals for former Presidents of the U.S.
    The above zones may also be enforced for unplanned events requiring
increased security, including but not limited to presidential
nominating conventions; international summits and conferences; and
meetings of international organizations.
    Security zone four includes all navigable waters of the Georgetown
Channel of the Potomac River, 75 yards from the eastern shore measured
perpendicularly to the shore, between the Long Railroad Bridge (the
most eastern bridge of the 5-span, Fourteenth Street Bridge Complex) to
the Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Bridge and all waters in between,
totally including the waters of the Georgetown Channel Tidal Basin.
This zone is enforced annually from 12:01 a.m. to 11:59 p.m. local time
on July 4.
    Security zone five includes all navigable waters in the Potomac
River, including the Boundary Channel and Pentagon Lagoon, bounded on
the west by a line running north to south from points along the
shoreline at 38[deg]52'50'' N./077[deg]03'25'' W., thence to
38[deg]52'49'' N./077[deg]03'25'' W.; and bounded on the east by a line
running from points at 38[deg]53'10'' N./077[deg]03'30'' W., thence
northeast to 38[deg]53'12'' N./077[deg]03'26'' W., thence southeast to
38[deg]52'31'' N./077[deg]02'34'' W., and thence southwest to
38[deg]52'28'' N./077[deg]02'38'' W. This zone will be enforced on
three days each year: Memorial Day (observed), September 11, and
November 11. Specifically, the zone will be enforced from 10 a.m. until
1 p.m. on Memorial Day (observed); from 8 a.m. until 11:59 a.m. on
September 11; and from 10 a.m. until 1 p.m. on November 11.
    Security zone six includes all navigable waters of the Potomac
River, from shoreline to shoreline, bounded on the north by the Francis
Scott Key (U.S. Route 29) Bridge at mile 113.0, downstream to and
bounded on the south by the Woodrow Wilson Memorial (I-95/I-495)
Bridge, at mile 103.8, including the waters of the Boundary Channel,
Pentagon Lagoon, Georgetown Channel Tidal Basin, and Roaches Run; and
all waters of the Anacostia River, from shoreline to shoreline, bounded
on the north by the John Philip Sousa (Pennsylvania Avenue) Bridge, at
mile 2.9, downstream to and bounded on the south by its confluence with
the Potomac River. This zone will be enforced annually for the State of
the Union Address, starting at 9 a.m. on the day of the State of the
Union Address through 2 a.m. the following day.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration and time of year of the security zones. The Coast
Guard determined that this rulemaking would not be a significant
regulatory action for the following reasons: Security zones one, two
and three are expected to be enforced for only a week or two at a time
and on only a few occasions per year. Additionally, the Coast Guard
designed the areas for security zones one, two and three to cover only
a portion of the navigable waterways while still sustaining the flow of
commerce, and mariners may request permission from the COTP Maryland-
National Capital Region or the designated representative to transit the
zone. Security zones four and five are expected to be enforced for only
less than 24 hours at a time and on only a few occasions per year.
Additionally, the Coast Guard designed the areas for security zones
four and five to cover only a small portion of the navigable waterways,
waterway users may transit the Potomac River around the areas, and
mariners may request permission from the COTP Maryland-National Capital
Region or the designated representative to transit the zone. Security
zone six is expected to be enforced for only less than 24 hours at a
time and on only on one occasion per year when vessel traffic is
normally low. Additionally, the Coast Guard designed the area for
security zone six to cover only a portion of the navigable waterways
while still sustaining the flow of commerce, and mariners may request
permission from the COTP Maryland-National Capital Region or the

designated representative to transit the zone. Moreover, the Coast
Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine
channel 16 about the zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek
permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves security zones that would prohibit entry on specified
waters of the Potomac River and Anacostia River, and adjacent waters,
during increased security events. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting this
determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are available
in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1,
6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Revise Sec.  165.508 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.508  Security Zone; Potomac River and Anacostia River, and
adjacent waters; Washington, DC.

    (a) Location. Coordinates used in this paragraph are based on
NAD83. The following areas are security zones:
    (1) Zone 1. All navigable waters of the Potomac River, from
shoreline to shoreline, bounded to the north by the Francis Scott Key
(US-29) Bridge, at mile 113, and bounded to the south by a line drawn
from the Virginia shoreline at Ronald Reagan Washington National
Airport, at 38[deg]51'21.3'' N., 077[deg]02'00.0'' W., eastward across
the Potomac River to the District of Columbia shoreline at Hains Point
at position 38[deg]51'24.3'' N., 077[deg]01'19.8'' W., including the
waters of the Boundary Channel, Pentagon Lagoon, Georgetown Channel
Tidal Basin, and Roaches Run;
    (2) Zone 2. All navigable waters of the Anacostia River, from
shoreline to shoreline, bounded to the north by the John Philip Sousa
(Pennsylvania Avenue) Bridge, at mile 2.9, and bounded to the south by
a line drawn from the District of Columbia shoreline at Hains Point at
position 38[deg]51'24.3''

N., 077[deg]01'19.8'' W., southward across the Anacostia River to the
District of Columbia shoreline at Giesboro Point at position
38[deg]50'52.4'' N., 077[deg]01'10.9'' W., including the waters of the
Washington Channel;
    (3) Zone 3. All navigable waters of the Potomac River, from
shoreline to shoreline, bounded to the north by a line drawn from the
Virginia shoreline at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, at
38[deg]51'21.3'' N., 077[deg]02'00.0'' W., eastward across the Potomac
River to the District of Columbia shoreline at Hains Point at position
38[deg]51'24.3'' N., 077[deg]01'19.8'' W., thence southward across the
Anacostia River to the District of Columbia shoreline at Giesboro Point
at position 38[deg]50'52.4'' N., 077[deg]01'10.9'' W., and bounded to
the south by the Woodrow Wilson Memorial (I-95/I-495) Bridge, at mile
103.8.
    (4) Zone 4. All navigable waters of the Georgetown Channel of the
Potomac River, 75 yards from the eastern shore measured perpendicularly
to the shore, between the Long Railroad Bridge (the most eastern bridge
of the 5-span, Fourteenth Street Bridge Complex) to the Theodore
Roosevelt Memorial Bridge; and all waters in between, totally including
the waters of the Georgetown Channel Tidal Basin.
    (5) Zone 5. All navigable waters in the Potomac River, including
the Boundary Channel and Pentagon Lagoon, bounded on the west by a line
running north to south from points along the shoreline at
38[deg]52'50'' N., 077[deg]03'25'' W., thence to 38[deg]52'49'' N.,
077[deg]03'25'' W.; and bounded on the east by a line running from
points at 38[deg]53'10'' N., 077[deg]03'30'' W., thence northeast to
38[deg]53'12'' N., 077[deg]03'26'' W., thence southeast to
38[deg]52'31'' N., 077[deg]02'34'' W., and thence southwest to
38[deg]52'28'' N., 077[deg]02'38'' W.
    (6) Zone 6. All navigable waters described in paragraphs (a)(1)
through (a)(3) of this section.
    (b) Regulations. The general security zone regulations found in 33
CFR 165.33 apply to the security zones created by this section, Sec.
165.508.
    (1) Entry into or remaining in a zone listed in paragraph (a) in
this section is prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain
of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region. Public vessels and
vessels already at berth at the time the security zone is implemented
do not have to depart the security zone. All vessels underway within
the security zone at the time it is implemented are to depart the zone
at the time the security zone is implemented.
    (2) Persons desiring to transit the area of the security zone must
first obtain authorization from the Captain of the Port Maryland-
National Capital Region or his or her designated representative. To
seek permission to transit the area, the Captain of the Port Maryland-
National Capital Region and his or her designated representatives can
be contacted at telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER> or on Marine Band Radio,
VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard vessels enforcing this
section can be contacted on Marine Band Radio, VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8
MHz). Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel, or other Federal,
State, or local agency vessel, by siren, radio, flashing light, or
other means, the operator of a vessel shall proceed as directed. If
permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital
Region or his designated representative and proceed at the minimum
speed necessary to maintain a safe course while within the zone.
    (3) The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the security zones listed in paragraph (a) in this
section by Federal, State, and local agencies.
    (c) Definitions. As used in this section:
    Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region means the
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region or
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been
authorized by the Captain of the Port to act on his or her behalf.
    Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region to assist in enforcing the
security zones described in paragraph (a) of this section.
    Public vessel means a vessel that is owned or demise-(bareboat)
chartered by the government of the United States, by a State or local
government, or by the government of a foreign country and that is not
engaged in commercial service.
    (d) Enforcement. (1) In addition to the specified times in
paragraphs (d)(2) through (4) of this section, the security zones
created by this section will be enforced only upon issuance of a notice
of enforcement by the Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital
Region. The Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region will
cause notice of enforcement of these security zones to be made by all
appropriate means to the affected segments of the public of the
enforcement dates and times of the security zones including publication
in the Federal Register, in accordance with 33 CFR 165.7(a). Such means
of notification may also include, but are not limited to Broadcast
Notice to Mariners or Local Notice to Mariners.
    (2) Security Zone 4, established in paragraph (a)(4) of this
section, will be enforced annually, from 12:01 a.m. to 11:59 p.m. on
July 4.
    (3) Security Zone 5, established in paragraph (a)(5) of this
section, will be enforced annually on three dates: Memorial Day
(observed), September 11, and November 11. Security Zone 5 will be
enforced from 10 a.m. until 1 p.m. on Memorial Day (observed); from 8
a.m. until 11:59 a.m. on September 11; and from 10 a.m. until 1 p.m. on
November 11.
    (4) Security Zone 6, established in paragraph (a)(6) of this
section, will be enforced annually on the day the State of the Union
Address is delivered. Security Zone 6 will be enforced from 9 a.m. on
the day of the State of the Union Address until 2 a.m. on the following
day.
    (e) Suspension of enforcement. (1) The Captain of the Port
Maryland-National Capital Region may suspend enforcement of the
enforcement period in paragraphs (d)(1) through(4) in this section
earlier than listed in the notice of enforcement. Should the Captain of
the Port Maryland-National Capital Region suspend the zone earlier than
the duration listed, he or she will make the public aware of this
suspension by Broadcast Notice to Mariners and/or on-scene notice by
his or her designated representative.

    Dated: November 9, 2016.
Lonnie P. Harrison, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Maryland-National
Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2016-27628 Filed 11-16-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

	    Issued by the Department of Transportation on October 23, 2002

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2002-13523

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no

additional confirming order will be issued in this matter).

Applicant:  Antonov Design Bureau				Date Filed:  10/18/02, as
supplemented 10/21/02

Relief requested:  Seven-day extension of the effective period of the 49
U.S.C. section 40109(g) exemption authority granted to Antonov by Order
2002-10-13, and the flexibility to coterminalize Ontario and/or
Victorville, CA, with Seattle, WA.   In support of its request Antonov
stated that West Coast port operations continue to be impaired and the
movement of containers off ships has proceeded more slowly than
predicted; that Honda’s most critically needed parts shipments are now
stalled at its southern California seaport gateways; that, as result of
these circumstances, the the situation at Honda’s production lines is
even more serious; and that this extension and coterminalization
flexibility will be instrumental in helping address Honda’s serious
parts supply crisis and maintain production levels at U.S. plants.

Applicant representative:  Alexander Van der Bellen<PHONE_NUMBER>
  DOT analyst:  Barbara Schools<PHONE_NUMBER>

Responsive pleadings:  Antonov served its application on those U.S.
carriers operating large all-cargo aircraft.  Except as noted below,
each carrier indicated that it did not have aircraft available to
conduct the proposed operation and that it had no comment or did not
oppose grant of the requested authority to Antonov.

Statutory Standards:  Under 49 U.S.C. section 40109(g), we may authorize
a foreign air carrier to carry commercial traffic between U.S. points
(i.e., cabotage traffic) under limited circumstances.  Specifically, we
must find that the authority is required in the public interest; that
because of an emergency created by unusual circumstances not arising in
the normal course of business the traffic cannot be accommodated by U.S.
carriers holding certificates under 49 U.S.C. section 41102; that all
possible efforts have been made to place the traffic on U.S. carriers;
and that the transportation is necessary to avoid unreasonable hardship
to the traffic involved (an additional required finding, concerning
emergency transportation during labor disputes, was not relevant here).
For examples of earlier grants of authority of this type, see, e.g.,
Order 2001-5-23.

	DISPOSITION

Action:  Approved							Action date:  October 23, 2002

Effective dates of authority granted:  October 23, 2002 - October 30,
2002

Basis for approval:  We found in the circumstances presented that our
previous public interest findings supporting grant of this authority
remained valid and that Antonov’s request for extension and
coterminalization flexibility met all the relevant criteria of 49 U.S.C.
section 40109(g) for the grant of an exemption of this type and that the
grant was required in the public interest.  (See Order 2002-10-13 dated
October 9, 2002, in this docket.)

Except to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to our
standard exemption conditions (attached) and to the condition that
Antonov comply with an FAA-approved flight routing for the authorized
flights.

Action taken by:   	Read C. Van de Water

			Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:  http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

												        Appendix A

FOREIGN AIR CARRIER CONDITIONS OF AUTHORITY

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the holder shall:

(1)  Not conduct any operations unless it holds a currently effective
authorization from its homeland for such operations, and it has filed a
copy of such authorization with the Department;

(2)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration, including, but not limited to, 14 CFR Parts 129, 91, and
36, and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning
security;1

(3)  Comply with the requirements for minimum insurance coverage
contained in 14 CFR Part 205, and, prior to the commencement of any
operations under this authority, file evidence of such coverage, in the
form of a completed OST Form 6411, with the Federal Aviation
Administration’s Program Management Branch (AFS-260), Flight Standards
Service (any changes to, or termination of, insurance also shall be
filed with that office);

(4)  Not operate aircraft under this authority unless it complies with
operational safety requirements at least equivalent to Annex 6 of the
Chicago Convention;

(5)  Conform to the airworthiness and airman competency requirements of
its Government for international air services;

(6)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 203,
concerning waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(7)  Agree that operations under this authority constitute a waiver of
sovereign immunity, for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1605(a), but only with
respect to those actions or proceedings instituted against it in any
court or other tribunal in the United States that are:

   (a)  based on its operations in international air transportation
that, according to the contract of carriage, include a point in the
United States as a point of origin, point of destination, or agreed
stopping place, or for which the contract of carriage was purchased in
the United States; or

   (b)  based on a claim under any international agreement or treaty
cognizable in any court or other tribunal of the United States.

In this condition, the term "international air transportation" means
"international transportation" as defined by the Warsaw Convention,
except that all States shall be considered to be High Contracting
Parties for the purpose of this definition;

(8)  Except as specifically authorized by the Department, originate or
terminate all flights to/from the United States in its homeland;

(9)  Comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 217, concerning the
reporting of scheduled, nonscheduled, and charter data;

(10) If charter operations are authorized, except as otherwise provided
in the applicable aviation agreement, comply with the Department's rules
governing charters (including 14 CFR Parts 212 and 380); and

(11) Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department, with all applicable orders or regulations of other U.S.
agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the United States.

This authority shall not be effective during any period when the holder
is not in compliance with the conditions imposed above.  Moreover, this
authority cannot be sold or otherwise transferred without explicit
Department approval under Title 49 of the U.S. Code (formerly the
Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended).__________________

1  To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, the holder should, before commencing any new
service (including charter flights) from a foreign airport that would be
the holder’s last point of departure for the United States, inform its
Principal Security Inspector of its plans.

U.S. Department of Transportation

Office of the Secretary of Transportation									        (41301/40109)
10/2002

  By Order 2002-10-13, dated October 9, 2002, the Department granted
Antonov an exemption pursuant to 49 U.S.C. section 40109(g) to permit it
to operate a maximum of 20 one-way cargo charter flights from Seattle,
WA, to Columbus, OH, during the period ending October 20, 2002.  In its
original application for this authority, Antonov stated that the flights
were on behalf of Honda Motors Ltd. and Honda of America, which required
urgent delivery of shipping containers holding motor vehicle parts and
components that had been held up by the West Coast port lockout; that
once the lockout ended, Honda needed to move the containers without
further delay to its U.S. manufacturing facilities in order to maintain
production; and that no U.S. carrier was in a position to provide
alternate lift that would meet its requirements.

  Arrow Air, Inc., noted its answer filed in response to Antonov’s
original application, but had no further comments.


[Federal Register: September 16, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 179)]
[Notices]
[Page 56654-56655]
[DOCID:fr16se10-120]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Approvals and
Disapprovals

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Monthly Notice of PFC Approvals and Disapprovals. In August
2010, there were two applications approved. This notice also includes
information on one application, approved in July 2010, inadvertently
left off the July 2010 notice. Additionally, three approved amendments
to previously approved applications are listed.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA publishes a monthly notice, as appropriate, of PFC
approvals and disapprovals under the provisions of the Aviation Safety
and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Pub. L. 101-508) and Part 158 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 158). This notice is
published pursuant to paragraph d of Sec.  158.29.

PFC Applications Approved

    Public Agency: Puerto Rico Ports Authority, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
    Application Number: 09-06-C-00-SJC.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $3.00.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $19,713,152.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: August 1, 2031.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: March 1, 2033.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFCs: None.
    Brief Description of Project Approved for Collection at Luis Munoz
Marin International Airport (SJU) and Use at SJU at a $3.00 PFC Level:
PFC application development.

    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection at SJU and
Use at Jose Aponte de la Torre Airport at a $3.00 PFC Level:

Phase 0 construction--terminal facility.

Rehabilitation of airfield guidance signage.
Rehabilitation of taxiway lighting system.
Pavement rehabilitation of runway 7/25 and taxiways.
Airfield pavement markings.

    Decision Date: July 22, 2010.
    For Further Information Contact: Susan Moore, Orlando Airports
District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Public Agency: Port of Bellingham, Bellingham, Washington.
    Application Number: 10-11-C-00-BLI.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $30,250,000.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: October 1, 2010.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: October 1, 2027.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFCs: None.
    Brief Description of Project Approved for Collection and Use:
Commercial terminal expansion.
    Decision Date: August 11, 2010.
    For Further Information Contact: Trang Tran, Seattle Airports
District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Public Agency: City of Lubbock, Texas.
    Application Number: 10-07-C-00-LBB.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $13,101,351.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: December 1, 2013.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: April 1, 2020.
    Classes of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFCs: (1) Part 135
air taxi/commercial operators filing FAA Form 1800-31; (2) commuters
and small certificated air carriers filing Department of Transportation
Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA) Form T-100 for non-
scheduled enplanements; and (3) large certificated route air carriers
filing RSPA Form T-100 for non-scheduled enplanements.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that each proposed
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Lubbock-Preston Smith International Airport.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:

Runway 8/26 improvements--phase I
Runway 8/26 improvements--phase II.
Replace passenger loading bridges.
    Decision Date: August 12, 2010.
    For Further Information Contact: Steven Cooks, Texas Airports
Development Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Amendments to PFC Approvals:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Original     Amended
                                            Amendment      Original         Amended      estimated    estimated
        Amendment No. City, State            approved    approved  net   approved  net     charge       charge
                                               date      PFC  revenue    PFC  revenue    exp. date    exp. date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
98-05-C-05-MCO Orlando, FL...............     08/03/10    $119,178,876    $114,471,533     10/01/00     10/01/00
06-06-C-02-SAV Savannah, GA..............     08/04/10       4,480,700       4,490,100     03/01/13     03/01/13
03-04-C-03-PIH Pocatello, ID.............     08/10/10         294,313         302,926     04/01/08     04/01/08
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued in Washington, DC on September 3, 2010.
Joe Hebert,
Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger Facility Charge Branch.
[FR Doc. 2010-22959 Filed 9-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M