United States
Environmental Protection
Agency

Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention
(7510P)
	EPA 712-C-07-005
                                                   	January (insert date), 2012
	Product Performance Test Guidelines

		OCSPP 810.2000:
            General Considerations for Public Health Uses of Antimicrobial Agents

                                     NOTICE
            This guideline is one of a series of test guidelines established by the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP) (formerly the Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (OPPTS) prior to April 22, 2010), United States Environmental Protection Agency for use in testing pesticides and chemical substances to develop data for submission to the Agency under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) (15 U.S.C. 2601, et seq.), the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136, et seq.), and section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FFDCA) (21 U.S.C. 346a), referred to hereinafter as the harmonized test guidelines.

  	The harmonized test guidelines serve as a compendium of accepted scientific methodologies and protocols that are intended to provide data to inform regulatory decisions under TSCA, FIFRA, and/or FFDCA.  This document provides guidance for conducting appropriate tests, and is also used by EPA, the public, and the companies that are subject to data submission requirements under TSCA, FIFRA and/or the FFDCA.  At places in this guidance, the Agency uses the word "should."  In this guidance, use of "should" with regard to an action means that the action is recommended rather than mandatory.  As a guidance document, these guidelines are not binding on either EPA or any outside parties, and the EPA may depart from the guidelines where circumstances warrant and without prior notice.  The methods contained in this guideline are strongly recommended for generating the data that are the subject of the guideline, but EPA recognizes that departures may be appropriate in specific situations. You may propose alternatives to the methods recommended in these guidelines, with your supporting rationale. The Agency will assess such proposals on a case-by-case basis.

  	For additional information about OCSPP harmonized test guidelines and to access the guidelines electronically, please go to http://www.epa.gov/ocspp and select "Test Methods & Guidelines" on the left side navigation menu.  You may also access the guidelines in http://www.regulations.gov grouped by Series under Docket ID #s: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0150 through EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0159, and EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0576.

OCSPP 810.2000: General considerations for testing public health antimicrobial agents.

      (a) Scope.

           (1) Applicability. This guideline describes test methods that EPA believes will generally satisfy testing requirements of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)(7U.S.C. 136, et seq.) and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) (21 I/S/C. 346a).

           (2) Background. The source material used in developing this OCSPP test guideline is OPP guideline 91-1: General Require - ments for Antimicrobial Agents (Pesticide Assessment Guidelines, Subdivi - sion G, Product Performance, EPA report 540/9-82-026, October 1982).

      (b) Overview -- Product performance.

           (1) General concepts. Any evaluation of product performance is conducted in light of expressed and implied labeling claims or recommendations concerning pests, sites, methods of application, application equipment, dosage rates, timing and number of applications, use situations, nature and level of pest control, duration of pest control, compatibility with other chemicals, benefits and/or adverse effects of product use, compatibility of common practices associated with the sites, active ingredient status of chemicals in the formulation, and equipment.

      (i) Laboratory and/or simulated-use testing is conducted to determine the effectiveness of a substance, or mixture of substances, to control or kill specific pest organisms, and in some cases to determine whether the substance has sufficient pesticide potential to warrant larger scale testing (e.g., swimming pool disinfectants).

      (ii) In some cases, effectiveness and usefulness of the proposed product is further proven through advanced large-scale laboratory tests, field tests, in-use tests, or simulated-use tests by procedures which closely approximate actual use and which employ typically used application equipment (e.g. fumigant sterilants).

           (2) [Reserved]

           (3) Waiver policy. As outlined in 40 CFR Part 161, the Agency has waived all requirements to submit efficacy data unless the pesticide product bears a claim to control one or more pest microorganisms that pose a threat to human health and whose presence cannot readily be observed by the user, including but not limited to, microorganisms infectious to man in any area of the inanimate environment. However, pursuant to FIFRA, each registrant must ensure through testing that its products are efficacious when used in accordance with label directions and commonly accepted pest control practices. The registrant must develop and maintain the relevant data upon which the determination of efficacy is based. The agency reserves the right to require, on a case-by-case basis submission of efficacy data for any pesticide product, registered or proposed for registration.

           (4) Series organization. Table 1 outlines the organization of the OCSPP Test Guideline Series 810.2000.

      Table 1.  Organization of the OCSPP Test Guideline Series 810.2000.

                                Guideline Name
                               Guideline Number
                 Previous Subdivision  - G Guideline Number(s)
Sterilants  -  Efficacy Data Recommendations
810.2100
91-2(a)

Disinfectants for Use on Hard Surfaces  -  Efficacy Data Recommendations
810.2200
91-2(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(i)
91-7(a)(1)
91-3
Sanitizers for Use on Hard Surfaces  -  Efficacy Data Recommendations
810.2300
91-2(j)(k)(l)(m)
91-3
Disinfectants and Sanitizers for Use on Textiles  -  Efficacy Data Recommendations
810.2400
91-4(a)(1)(2)(3)(4)
91-4(b)(c)(d)
Air Sanitizers  -  Efficacy Data Recommendations
810.2500
91-5
Disinfectants for Use in Water  -  Efficacy Data Recommendations
810.2600
91-8
Prions  -  Efficacy Data Recommendations
810-2700
Not Applicable

           (5) Future guidelines. The Agency recognizes the fact that novel technologies associated with antimicrobial products may evolve over time and would potentially involve test methods that are not referenced in this current guideline.  In addition, the Agency is considering adopting the use of quantitative test methods as a possible replacement for current qualitative methods [e.g., Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) Use-Dilution Methods] in the future. The Agency expects to update the guidelines periodically. However, the use of new methods may occur, on a case-by-case basis, prior to guideline updates and these new methods will be published on the EPA Antimicrobial Policy and Guidance Documents website until such time that they can be added to the guidelines.

      (c) Public health and nonpublic health uses of antimicrobial products

           (1) Antimicrobial products with public health uses. (i) Health-related considerations. Microbial pests can be categorized into two basic types: Those that present potential public health hazards because of their infectious nature to humans and those that cause economic or aes - thetic problems such as spoilage, fouling, or production of offensive odors in the substrate in which they grow. The OCSPP Test Guideline Series 810.2000 addresses antimicrobial pesticide products with public health uses for which efficacy test data are required to be submitted to support registration. These include all antimicrobial products intended to control micro - organisms infectious to man in any area of the inanimate environment where these microorganisms may present a hazard to human health. The label claims for an antimicrobial product determine whether it is consid - ered to be related to human health.

      (ii) Public health claim. An antimicrobial pesticide is considered to make a public health claim if the pesticide product bears a claim to control one or more pest microorganisms that pose a threat to human health, and whose presence cannot readily be observed by the user, including but not limited to, microorganisms infectious to man in any area of the environment. A product makes a public health claim if one or more of the following apply:

      (A) A claim is made for control of one or more specific microorganisms that are directly or indirectly infectious or pathogenic to man (or both man and animals). Examples of specific microorganisms include, but are not limited to, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli (E. coli), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Streptococcus and Staphylococcus aureus. Claims for control of microorganisms infectious or pathogenic only to animals (such as canine distemper virus or hog cholera virus) are not considered public health claims.

      (B) A claim is made for the pesticide product as a sterilant, disinfectant, virucide, sanitizer or tuberculocide against one or more microorganisms that are infectious or pathogenic to man.

      (C) A claim is made for the pesticide product as a fungicide against one or more fungi infectious or pathogenic to man, or the product does not clearly state that it is intended for use only against non-public health fungi.

      (D) A claim is made for the pesticide product as a microbiological water purifier or microbial purification system or swimming pool disinfectant/sanitizer.

      (E) A non-specific claim is made that the pesticide product will beneficially impact or affect public health at the site of use on in the environments in which it is applied.

      (2) Antimicrobial products with non-public health uses. Registrants who propose non-health related claims for their product (e.g., control of odor-causing bacteria) should be aware that generally the Agency does not require submission of efficacy data to support such claims. However, the registrant is still responsible for ensuring that these products perform as intended by developing efficacy data which should be kept on file. The Agency still has the responsibility of making sure that the use directions proposed for non-public health related claims are appropriate and adequate. Therefore, the Agency retains the option of requiring the submission of efficacy data for non-public health related claims on a case-by-case basis.

      (i) Non-public health claim. An antimicrobial pesticide is considered to make a non-public health claim if the pesticide product bears a claim to control microorganisms of economic or aesthetic significance, where the presence of the microorganism would not normally lead to infection or disease in humans. Examples of non-public health claims would include, but are not limited to:

      (A) Slimicides, odor control and other non-public health agents. Slimicides and odor control agents, preservatives, algicides, and other products expressly claiming control of microorganisms of economic or aesthetic significance are not considered to be human health-related, but nevertheless must bear accurate labeling claims and adequate dosage recommendations, and complete directions for use.

      (B) Bacteriostatic/Fungistatic products. Since elimination or significant reduction in the number of microorganisms (sterilization, disinfection, sanitization) should be demonstrated before a product is considered acceptable for use against microorganisms infectious for humans, or for use in medical or sickroom environments, products bearing lower level labeling claims for effectiveness at the bacteriostatic/fungistatic (inhibition of growth) level would generally not be appropriate for such uses. Bacteriostatic/fungistatic claims are generally acceptable only for products expressly recommended for control of microorganisms of aesthetic significance (e.g., spoilage bacteria, odor-causing bacteria).

      (C) Treated articles. The Agency has clarified its policy on applicability of the treated articles exemption to antimicrobial pesticides and provided guidance on appropriate language or label claims in Pesticide Registration Notice 2000-1 (Ref. 1). The treated articles exemption (40 CFR 152.25(a)) covers qualifying articles and substances bearing claims to merely protect the article or substance itself, if, among other things, the pesticide is registered for such use.  This exemption does not include articles or substances bearing implied or explicit public health claims against human pathogens. Applicants who intend to market products with claims (such as public health claims) that go beyond the scope of the treated articles exemption should contact the Antimicrobials Division prior to conducting testing to support such a use.

      (D) Animal disease pathogens and zoonotic microorganisms. For products labeled for public health and/or non-public health uses, submission of studies to EPA on certain animal disease pathogens and zoonotic microorganisms may be appropriate prior to approval of the label claim. For example, although label claims against foot and mouth disease virus, Newcastle disease virus, and avian influenza A virus are not considered to be human health related, the Agency requires, on a case-by-case basis, the submission of efficacy data to support these claims because these pathogens have animal health significance or the potential to infect humans. Applicants should consult the Agency for a current listing of organisms which meet these criteria. These organisms are also listed on the World Organization for Animal Health's website, see, http://www.oie.int/animal -health-in-the-world/oie-listed-diseases-2011/.

      (d) Definitions. Because of the variety of microorganisms to be con - trolled and the different claims and many use patterns of antimicrobial products, consistent product terminology and a common understanding of a few key words are important to a program for evaluating product per - formance. Even though the OCSPP Test Guideline Series 810.2000 guidelines cover only public health uses, terms covering non-public health use patterns and/or organisms are included in order to support consistency and clarity. The terms in the OCSPP Test Guideline Series 810.2000, are generally used with the meanings set forth in this paragraph.

      Algicide means any substance, or mixture of substances, which kills or effectively reduces the number of living algae in water.

      Algistat means any substance, or mixture of substances, that inhibits the growth of algae in water.

      Antibacterial means any substance, or mixture of substances, that destroys or eliminates bacteria in the inanimate environment.

      Antibiotic resistant means the ability of a bacterial cell to resist the effects of antibiotics.

      Antifoulant means any substance, or mixture of substances, that is used to prevent the biological fouling of underwater structures or objects.

	Bacteriostat means a substance, or mixture of substances, that inhibits the growth of bacteria in the inanimate environment.

      Biocide/ Microbicide means any substance, or mixture of substances, that kills a number of living microorganisms (e.g., virucide--virus, mycobactericide--mycobacteria, algicide--algae; bactericide--bacteria; fungicide--fungi; slimicide--slime-forming microorganisms).

      Biofilm means a dynamic, self-organized accumulation of microorganisms and environmental by-products immobilized on a substrate and embedded in an organic polymer mix.  This organic polymer mix is also known by the term "glycocalyx."

      Confirmatory data is a reduced set of data which may be used to support an application or amendment for registration of a product, or a minor formulation change of a registered product. Each guideline further addresses confirmatory data

      Deodorizers means a substance, or mixture of substances, that are of two basic types: (1) Those that prevent or delay the formation of bacterial odors by killing micro - organisms which produce them, and (2) those that mask, chemically de - stroy or neutralize odors (refer to 40 CFR 152.10). Products that claim deodorization by antimicrobial means are subject to registration as pesticides under FIFRA.

      Disinfectant means a substance, or mixture of substances that destroys or irreversibly inactivates bacteria, fungi and viruses, but not necessarily bacterial spores, in the inanimate environment.

      Fungicide means a substance, or mixture of substances, that destroys fungi (including yeasts) and/or fungal spores pathogenic to man or other animals in the inanimate environment.

      Fungistat means a substance, or mixture of substances, that inhibits the growth of fungi in the inanimate environment.

      Microbiological water purifier means any unit, water treatment product or system that removes, kills or inactivates disease-causing microorganisms from the water, including bacteria, viruses and protozoan cysts so as to render the treated water safe for drinking.

      Microbiostat means a substance, or mixture of substances, that inhibits the growth of microorganisms (e.g., bacteriostat, fungistat, algistat).

      Mycobactericide means a substance, or mixture of substances, that destroys or irreversibly inactivates mycobacteria in the inanimate environment.

      Non-volatile means a substance that does not evaporate readily.

      One-Step Disinfectant means a substance, or mixture of substances, that has been tested and found to be effective in the presence of light to moderate soil, and, therefore, may be  used without a pre-cleaning step in the use directions.

      Preservative means a substance, or mixture of substances that inhibits the growth of microorganisms capable of causing biological deterioration of a material(s).

      Product performance refers to all pesticidal aspects of a product's effectiveness and usefulness.

      Sanitizer means a substance, or mixture of substances, that reduces the bacterial population in the inanimate environment by significant numbers, (e.g., 3 log 10 reduction) or more, but does not destroy or eliminate all bacteria. Sanitizers meeting Public Health Ordinances are used on food contact surfaces and are termed sanitizing rinses.

      Slime means a dynamic, self-organized accumulation of microorganisms and environmental by-products immobilized on a substrate and embedded in an organic polymer mix.  This organic polymer mix is also known by the term "glycocalyx."

      Slimicide means a substance, or mixture of substances, that reduces the number of slime-forming microorganisms in industrial water systems (e.g., paper mills).

      Sterilant means a substance, or mixture of substances, that destroys or eliminates all forms of microbial life in the inanimate environment, including all forms of vegetative bacteria, bacterial spores, fungi, fungal spores, and viruses.

      Sporicide means a substance, or mixture of substances, that irreversibly inactivates bacterial spores in the inanimate environment.

      Tuberculocide means a substance, or mixture of substances, that destroys or irreversibly inactivates tubercle bacilli in the inanimate environment.

      Two-Step Sanitizer or Two-Step Disinfectant means a substance or mixture of substances that has not been registered for effectiveness against microorganisms in the presence of light to moderate soil, and, therefore, need a pre-cleaning step for surfaces prior to sanitizing or disinfecting.

      Virucide means a substance, or mixture of substances, that destroys or irreversibly inactivates viruses in the inanimate environment.

      Volatile means a substance that evaporates readily.

      Zoonotic microorganism means an infectious agent that can be transmitted between animals and humans.

      (e) General testing considerations

      (1) Test substance.

      (i) Unless otherwise specified, antimicrobial pes - ticides should be tested on the formulation with the lowest certified limit(s) of the active ingredient(s) and, in some cases (e.g., pressurized sprays, towelettes) with the product in the same packaging intended to be marketed.  The following information should be provided:

      (ii) Identification of the test substance and quantitative description of its chemical composition should be reported.

      (iii) Manufacturer and production batch numbers of the test substance.  If a product is diluted, the report should specify the quantities and identification of each diluent.

      (iv) The manufacturer should also submit effective - ness data to show that they can consistently reproduce the formulation (batch replication), as well as to show that the product will retain its effectiveness for a minimal period of storage under aver - age conditions to which it is likely to be exposed (shelf-life stability)(Ref. 2).

      (v) In situations where it may not be technically feasible to test at the exact Lower Certified Limits (LCL) (e.g., reactive chemistries with a degradation profile, multiple active ingredients, formulations with inversely related active ingredients), a rationale should be provided to the Agency for approval of the testing if testing cannot be performed at the LCL  Efforts should be made to test as close to the LCL as possible.

      (2)  General considerations

      (i) Good Laboratory Practice Standards. Good Laboratory Practice Standards (GLP) as defined in 40 CFR Part 160 apply to studies to support all antimicrobial products used on hard surfaces. According to 40 CFR §160.17: "EPA may refuse to consider reliable for purposes of supporting an application for a research or marketing permit any data from a study which was not conducted in accordance with this part." 40 CFR §160.12 (b) requires with any submitted research data "[a] A statement that the study was conducted in accordance with this part; [b] A statement describing in detail all differences between the practices used in the study and those required by this part; or [c] A statement that the person was not a sponsor of the study, did not conduct the study, and does not know whether the study was conducted in accordance with this part."

      (ii) Use pattern. Depending upon the type of antimicrobial agent, target microorganisms, and the site to be treated, all tests should address those factors that would normally be expected to be encountered in the use pattern intended for the product, such as the method of application, the nature of the surface, item or substrate to be treated, the presence or absence of soil or other interfering conditions, tem - perature, exposure period, and the number of times or duration of time that the use solution can be used. Representative surfaces for testing are identified in each 810 Guideline.

      (iii) Additional factors. The actual test procedure to be employed will vary according to the characteristics of the product, the target pests and the pattern of use intended. A specification of methods in these guidelines for all conceivable public health uses is not feasible, and the applicant should be responsible for the validity of the test method selected to substantiate a product's efficacy. The applicants should ensure themselves that the selected method is current and applicable to the product and uses proposed for registration.

      (iv) New methods. If applicants believe they have alternative protocols for demonstrating the efficacy of a product, such protocols should be submitted to the Agency for review. In addition to modifying the standard methods, registrants may, in consultation with the Agency, develop and submit protocols for claims where no standard test methods have been developed.

      (3) Use of Antibiotic Resistant Test Organisms. Organisms to be labeled as antibiotic resistant should be accompanied by scientific data that substantiates the antibiotic resistance.  The Antibiotic Resistance confirmation should be conducted using the organism(s) listed on the label, and, if possible, should be performed at the same time as the efficacy testing.  The confirmation may also be conducted within the usual transfer cycle or other appropriate transfer depending upon organism's growth requirements.  The following information identified in paragraphs (e)(3)(i) through (e)(3)(iv) in this guideline should be submitted with the Antibiotic Resistance Confirmation testing or included in the final report.

      (i) Test organisms should be characterized according to paragraphs (e)(3)(i)(A) through (e)(3)(i)(D) of this guideline:

      (A) The source and identity (e.g. ATCC, private source, other).

      (B) The method of preparation prior to testing (e.g. transfer history).

      (C) The method used to confirm the identity (e.g. biochemical test, Gram stain, morphology).

      (D) The method of preservation/storage (e.g. refrigerated agar slants, cryogenic beads, other).

      (ii) Results of the testing including the numerical values of all antibiotics tested. An example of values would be Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) s for automated test, zone sizes for manual tests, and comparison to a standard Clinical and National Standards Institute interpretation of such tests.

      (iii) The scientific method used to obtain the results (Kirby-Bauer, disc agar diffusion, or gradient agar diffusion; automated MIC procedures or equivalent). If automated procedures are used, the manufacturer of such automation should be specified.

      (iv) Quality control procedures used to verify results.

      (f) Special considerations

      (1) Hard Surface Carrier Test vs. Use-Dilution Methods.  The AOAC International Hard Surface Carrier Test Method (Ref. 3) has only been validated for use with distilled water.  For other conditions (hard water, organic soil, and/or distilled water), the AOAC International Use-Dilution Method (Ref. 4) is the recommended method.

      (2) Elimination of Phenol Resistance Testing. As described in Pesticide Registration Notice 2001-4 (Ref. 5) the Agency is no longer recommending the use of the phenol resistance assay when conducting carrier-based efficacy tests. The phenol resistance assay was a component of the AOAC Use-Dilution Test methods, as well as the Tuberculocidal Activity of Disinfectants method.

      (3) Surrogate microorganisms. The Agency has approved the use of several surrogate organisms to be used as replacements for microorganisms that cannot be tested because of biohazards or unavailability of scientifically accepted methods. Applicants should consult with the Agency for guidance on additional surrogates. Examples of surrogate organisms are as follows in paragraphs (f)(3)(i) through (f)(3)(iv) of this guideline.

      (i) Mycobacterium bovis BCG has been adopted as a surrogate for human Mycobacterium tuberculosis. See Guideline 810.2200.

      (ii)  The duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) has been adopted as a surrogate for the chimpanzee test used in testing efficacy of disinfectants against human hepatitis B virus (Ref. 6). The data consistency control (method validation) stated in the referenced protocol utilizing two dilutions of BTC 835 has been eliminated.

      (iii) The bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) has been adopted as a surrogate for the hepatitis C virus (Ref. 7). The data consistency control (method validation) stated in the referenced protocol utilizing two dilutions of BARDAC 2280 has been eliminated.

      (iv) The feline calicivirus has been adopted as a surrogate for the Noroviruses (Ref.8). The data consistency control (method validation) stated in the referenced protocol utilizing two dilutions of bleach has been eliminated.

      (4) Antimicrobial rinses for fruits and vegetables. To support label claims for consumer-use products as antimicrobial rinses for fruits and vegetables, products should meet a two log reduction of five outbreak strains of Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli O157:H7. Currently there is no standard method for assessing the efficacy of antimicrobial rinses for pathogen reduction on the surfaces of fruits and vegetables (raw agricultural commodities). Applicants should consult with the Agency prior to conducting testing to support this use.

      (5) Use of Dacron Loops. The AOAC International has accepted the use of Dacron loops (also termed braided polyester), instead of silk suture loops, for peracetic acid containing products, as a method modification to the AOAC Sporicidal Activity Test.  Consult the Agency for other chemistries.  (Ref. 9).

      (g) Special situations. When it is intended that an antimicrobial product be used in a manner that is not reflected by the test conditions specified in the recommended AOAC methods (e.g., inclusion of organic soil or hard water), one or more test conditions specified in the method should be modified and/or supplementary data developed in order to provide meaningful results relative to the conditions of use of the product.  The information in paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(4) in this guideline is critical to the development and submission of the appropriate supportive efficacy data.

      (1) Type of surface. When an antimicrobial product is intended to be effective in treating a hard, porous surface, some of the recommended methods may be modified to simulate this more stringent condition by substitution of a hard, porous surface carrier (e.g., porcelain penicylinder or unglazed ceramic tile) for the hard, nonporous surface carrier (stainless steel cylinder or glass slide) specified in the method. In addition, control data (e.g., quantitation of dried carrier, neutralization confirmation, sterility controls) should be developed to assure the validity of the test results when this modification of the method is employed. Since the use of a hard, porous surface would simulate the more stringent test condition, demonstrated efficacy on hard, porous surfaces would suffice to support an analogous claim for efficacy of the product on hard, non-porous surfaces as well.

      (2) Hard water claim. Any product that bears label claims for effec - tiveness in hard water should be tested by the appropriate method which has been modified to demonstrate effectiveness of the product in synthetic hard water at the level claimed. The hard water tolerance level may differ with the level of antimicrobial activity claimed (e.g., sterilization, disinfection, or sanitization). To establish efficacy in hard water, all microorganisms (bacteria, viruses, and fungi) claimed to be controlled by the product should be tested by the appropriate recommended method at the same hard water tolerance level. Refer to the AOAC International Germicidal and Detergent Sanitizing Action of Disinfectants test (Official Method 960.09) for guidance on the preparation of synthetic hard water (Ref. 10).

      (3) Organic burden.

      (i) An antimicrobial substance identified as a one-step cleaner-disinfectant or cleaner-sanitizer, or intended to be effective in the presence of light to moderate amounts of organic burden, should be tested for efficacy by the appropriate methods which have been modified to in - clude a minimum of a 5% representative organic soil such as blood serum or scientifically accepted equivalent as serum may be inhibitory to some viruses (Ref. 11). Registrants should check with the Agency to determine the acceptability of an organic burden other than blood serum.

      (ii) A sug - gested procedure to simulate in-use conditions where the antimicrobial agent is intended to treat dry inanimate surfaces contaminated with an or - ganic soil load involves contamination of the appropriate carrier surface with each test microorganisms culture containing 5% v/v blood serum (e.g., 19 mL test microorganism culture +1 mL blood serum) prior to the specified carrier-drying step in the method. Additional organic material need not be incorporated into those procedures where at least 5 percent blood serum is already present in the microbial inoculum to be dried on the surface. Control data (e.g., quantitation of dried carrier counts, neutralization confirmation, sterility controls) should also be developed to assure the validity of the test results when this modification is incorporated into the method. The organic soil level suggested is considered appropriate for simulating lightly or mod - erately soiled surface conditions. When the surface to be treated has heavy soil deposits, a cleaning step should be recommended on the label prior to the application of the antimicrobial agent. The effectiveness of antimicrobial agents should be demonstrated in the presence of a specific organic soil at an appropriate concentration level when specifically claimed and/or indicated by the pattern of use.

      (iii) A suggested procedure for incorporating a light to moderate organic soil load where the antimicrobial agent is not tested against a dry inanimate surface, such as the AOAC International Fungicidal Activity of Disinfectants test (Ref. 12) and the Quantitative Tuberculocidal Test (Ref. 13) involves adding a minimum of 5% (v/v) blood serum directly to the test solution (e.g., 4.75 mL test solution + 0.25 mL blood serum) before adding 0.5 mL of the test organism.

      (iv) When a product is recommended for certain patterns of use where the organic soil claimed is of a specific type, such as soap film residue, the product should be tested in the presence of that specific organic soil. Registrants should provide specific information in the data report regarding the way in which the organic soil, such as soap film residue was prepared (e.g., percentages of ingredients).

      (4) Exposure period. The exposure period required for an antimicrobial product to be effective may be shorter than the exposure period specified in the recommended method.  A modification to provide a shorter exposure period is restricted by the manipulative limitations inherent in the test procedure. A modification to provide a longer exposure period is restricted by the practical considerations of the use patterns (e.g., an exposure period of >10 min cannot be recommended for a product that will effectively evaporate from the treated surface in 10 min). If the product is to be represented in labeling for use at exposure periods shorter than those specified in the method this deviation in the method should be included in the test protocol submitted with the data. For liquid products containing volatile active ingredients where the product is applied to an environmental surface, the exposure period should be determined by the AOAC International Germicidal Spray Products As Disinfectants test (Ref. 14). Use of methods that immerse contaminated carriers in the disinfectant fluid would not closely simulate the way in which the volatile disinfectants perform on environmental surfaces.

      (h) Microbiological technique considerations

      (1) Microorganism survival after drying on a hard surface. Quantitative determinations of the microbial counts on the untreated control carriers after drying should be conducted in order to determine the validity of the test results obtained with the treated carriers. The control carrier count evaluation should be performed at the completion of the test. These quantitative determinations should be performed for all carrier-based assays, whether or not modifications are made to the method being used. The test results should include the individual dried carrier counts obtained by the method. The detailed final report for this testing should include information and descriptions regarding: preparation of the inoculum; application of the inoculum to the carrier; the time/temperature and relative humidity conditions for drying the microorganisms on the carrier; the technique for removal of the microorganisms from the carrier; and the specific assay procedure indicating such details as replication, subculture media, diluents, and the incubation time/temperature conditions for the enumeration procedure employed.

      (2) Microorganism survival for suspension tests. Quantitative determination of the microbial count of the inoculum in a parallel untreated diluent should be conducted in order to determine the level of microbial challenge in the test (Numbers Control). These quantitative determinations should be performed for all suspension assays, whether or not modifications are made to the method being used. The test results should include the individual counts obtained by the recovery method. The detailed final report for suspension testing should include information and descriptions regarding: preparation of the inoculum, the volumes used for inoculation, and the specific assay procedure indicating such details as replication, subculture media, diluents, and the incubation time/temperature conditions for the enumeration procedure employed.

      (3) Neutralization. Neutralization is the process for inactivating or quenching antimicrobial activity during efficacy testing. This may be achieved through physical (e.g., filtration, dilution, secondary subculture) and/or chemical (e.g., addition of sodium thiosulfate to the diluent) means. For each efficacy test, neutralization procedures should be employed, at the completion of the contact time, in order to preclude residual effects of the active ingredients in the subculture medium. If neutralization is not properly employed, the results of efficacy testing may be exaggerated. The method of neutralization, whether that be physical or chemical, should be confirmed. Data should be submitted (Neutralization Confirmation) in the final report to demonstrate that the neutralization method sufficiently inactivated the active ingredient(s) and that any neutralizer medium used did not possess any antimicrobial activity. In lieu of chemical neutralization, it should be documented that appropriate subculture techniques have been employed that preclude residual carryover of active ingredients. To document the absence of residual effects of the active ingredients in the subculture medium, the examples of neutralization techniques procedures in paragraphs (h)(3)(i) through (h)(3)(ii) in this guideline should be followed.

      (i) In qualitative test methods, after treatment, the inoculated carrier is initially deposited in a tube of growth media (i.e., primary subculture). If the primary subculture tube is not sufficient to achieve neutralization by the use of a chemical agent and/or through dilution of the  test substance, the carrier may then be transferred to a second tube of growth media (i.e., secondary subculture). Secondary subculture may be helpful in achieving neutralization. The neutralization procedure employed should be confirmed and reported by running a parallel test with uninoculated carriers being added to growth media containing a low level (i.e., 10  -  100 CFU/mL) of bacteria. Both the primary cultures and secondary subcultures should be incubated and checked for growth in the test and the neutralization confirmation. Dried test carriers should not be used to test the ability of a subculture medium to support organism growth, as this would provide too large a bioburden and may lead to an inaccurate evaluation of the presence of any bacteriostasis that may result from the carry-over of the antimicrobial substance on the carrier to the subculture medium. Growth results for both primary and secondary subcultures should be reported for the test and neutralization confirmation in the final report.

      (ii) A neutralization confirmation for suspension based test methods should be conducted for all neutralization/recovery methods employed in testing. Neutralization confirmation may be conducted by neutralizing the test substance, without the organism, as in the test. After neutralization, inoculation of a low level of organism (5-100 CFU/mL) and subsequent plating should follow. Plate counts should be within 1.0 log of a parallel population control:
      (A) For virucidal tests, scientifically accepted controls, including proper neutralization controls should be performed (e.g., ASTM E1482) (Ref. 16).

      (4) Batch replication for modified tests. Where batch replication has already been performed and accepted for a product registration with unmodified tests by the recommended methods, additional testing at the same use concentration under modified conditions (e.g., different exposure period, presence of organic soil or hard water, porous surface carriers, etc.) may be conducted with reduced batch replications as in paragraphs (h)(4)(i) and (h)(4)(ii) in this guideline.

      (i) For basic efficacy claims (e.g., sterilants, disinfectants, sanitizers), two samples, representing two different batches, instead of three.

      (ii) For supplemental efficacy claims (e.g., fungicides, virucides, and tuberculocides), one sample instead of two.

      (5) Validation of efficacy. The Agency reserves the option to perform its own tests, on a case-by-case basis, following the protocol submitted with the registration if that protocol meets current agency standards. In all other cases, the Agency will conduct the validation studies using the current agency protocol."

      (6) Test failure. Failure of a product formulation to meet the specified testing or evaluation of success, constitutes evidence that the product is unlikely to be effective as claimed in actual use and is reportable under FIFRA section 6(a)(2).

      (i) References. The references in this paragraph may be consulted for additional background information:

      (1) Environmental Protection Agency, Pesticide Registration Notice PR 2000-1, Applicability of the Treated Articles Exemption to Antimicrobial Pesticides, March 6, 2000. Office of Pesticide Programs, Antimicrobials Division. See http://www.epa.gov/PR_Notices/.

      (2) Environmental Protection Agency, Pesticide Registration Notice PR 91-2, Accuracy of Stated Percentages for Ingredients Statement, May 2, 1991. Office of Pesticide Programs, Antimicrobials Division.  See http://www.epa.gov/PR_Notices/.

      (3) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. Chapter 6, Disinfectants, Hard Surface Carrier Test Methods, Current edition.  AOAC International, Suite 500, 481 North Frederick Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20877-2417.

      (4) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. Chapter 6, Disinfectants, Use-Dilution Methods, Current edition. AOAC International, Suite 500, 481 North Frederick Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20877-2417.

      (5) Environmental Protection Agency, Pesticide Registration Notice 2001-4, Elimination of Phenol Resistance Testing for Antimicrobial Disinfectant and Sanitizer Pesticides. Office of Pesticide Programs, Antimicrobials Division.  See http://www.epa.gov/PR_Notices/.

      (6) Protocols for Testing the Efficacy of Disinfectants Against Hepatitis B Virus (HBV). Office of Pesticide Programs, Antimicrobials Division. See http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/regpolicy.htm.

      (7) Virucidal Effectiveness Test Using Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus (BVDV) as a Surrogate for Human Hepatitis C Virus. Office of Pesticide Programs, Antimicrobials Division.  See http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/regpolicy.htm.

	(8) Virucidal Effectiveness Test Using Feline Calicivirus as a Surrogate for Norovirus.  Office of Pesticide Programs, Antimicrobials Division. See http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/regpolicy.htm.

      (9) McDonnell, G. (2003) J. AOAC Int. 86,407-411.

      (10) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. Chapter 6, Disinfectants, Official Method 960.09 - Germicidal and Detergent Sanitizing Action of Disinfectants, Current edition. AOAC International, Suite 500, 481 North Frederick Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20877-2417.

      (11) Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Test Method for Efficacy of Virucidal Agents Intended for Inanimate Environmental Surfaces, Designation E1053. American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428, current edition. .

      (12) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. Chapter 6, Disinfectants, Official Method 955.17 Fungicidal Activity of Disinfectants. Current edition. AOAC International, Suite 500, 481 North Frederick Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20877-2417.

      (13) Environmental Protection Agency, Data Call-in Notice for Tuberculocidal Effectiveness Data for All Antimicrobial Pesticides with Tuberculocidal Claims (Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Pro - grams, June 13, 1986). See http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/dis_tss_docs/dis-06.htm.

      (14) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. Chapter 6, Disinfectants, Official Method 961.02 - Germicidal Spray Products as Disinfectants, Current edition. AOAC International, Suite 500, 481 North Frederick Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20877-2417.

      (15) Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Standard Test Methods, Evaluation of Inactivators of Antimicrobial Agents, Designation E1054. American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428, current edition.

      (16) Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Standard Test Method for Neutralization of Virucidal Agents in Virucidal Efficacy Evaluations, Designation E1482. American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428, current edition.


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 22 (Friday, February 3, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 9212]
[FR Doc No: 2017-02330]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Number: PR17-20-000.
    Applicants: Atmos Pipeline--Texas.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b), (e)/: Atmos Pipeline--
Texas Revisions to Statement of Operating Conditions to be effective
12/21/2016; Filing Type: 980.
    Filed Date: 1/23/17.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>02.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/13/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-348-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate--Bay State
release to BBPC 792857 to be effective 2/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 1/25/17.
    Accession Number: 20170125-5063.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/6/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: January 26, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-02330 Filed 2-2-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 144 (Friday, July 30, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41030-41031]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16269]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Amendment Application To Incorporate Species Protection
Plan Into The Project Licenses and Soliciting Comments, Motions To
Intervene, and Protests

Brookfield White Pine Hydro, LLC.  Project No. 2325-100.
Merimil Limited Partnership......  Project No. 2574-092.
Hydro-Kennebec, LLC..............  Project No. 2611-091.

    Take notice that the following amendment application has been filed
with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Amendment of Licenses.
    b. Project Nos: P-2325-100; P-2574-092; P-2611-091.
    c. Date Filed: June 1, 2021.
    d. Applicants: Brookfield White Pine Hydro, LLC; Merimil Limited
Partnership; Hydro-Kennebec, LLC.
    e. Name of Projects: Weston, Lockwood, and Hydro-Kennebec
Hydroelectric Projects.
    f. Locations: The projects are located on the lower Kennebec River
in Kennebec and Somerset Counties, Maine.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Kelly Maloney, Licensing and Compliance
Manager, Brookfield White Pine Hydro, LLC, 150 Main Street, Lewiston,
ME 04240; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Marybeth Gay,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and
protests: August 25, 2021.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments, motions to intervene, and protests using the Commission's
eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp.
Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without
prior registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact
information at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll
free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, you may
submit a paper copy. Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service must
be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426.
Submissions sent via any other carrier must be addressed to: Kimberly
D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins
Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The first page of any filing should
include docket numbers P-2325-100, P-2574-092, and P-2611-091. Comments
emailed to Commission staff are not considered part of the Commission
record.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person whose name appears on the official service
list for the project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or
documents with the Commission relating to the merits of an issue that
may affect the responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they
must also serve a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    k. Description of Request: Brookfield Power US Asset Management,
LLC (Brookfield), on behalf of the affiliated licensees for the
Lockwood (P-2574), Hydro-Kennebec (P-2611), and Weston (P-2325)
Projects, requests Commission approval to amend the project licenses to
incorporate the provisions of a Species Protection Plan for Atlantic
salmon, Atlantic sturgeon, and shortnose sturgeon (Final Plan). The
Final Plan identifies proposed upstream and downstream fish passage
measures, as well as monitoring and management measures designed to
avoid or minimize the potential adverse effects of continued operation
of the projects on endangered Atlantic salmon, threatened Atlantic
sturgeon, and endangered shortnose sturgeon, and the designated
critical habitat for Atlantic salmon and Atlantic sturgeon.
    l. Locations of the Application: This filing may be viewed on the
Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. You may also register
online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be
notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-208-3676 or email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. Agencies may
obtain copies of the application directly from the applicant.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214, respectively. In determining the appropriate action to take, the
Commission will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only
those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with the
Commission's Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments,
protests, or motions to intervene must be received on or before the
specified comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Documents: Any filing must (1) bear in all
capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or ``MOTION TO
INTERVENE'' as applicable; (2) set forth in the heading the name of the
applicant and the project number of the application to which the filing
responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone number of the
person commenting, protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise comply
with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, motions to intervene, or protests must set forth their
evidentiary basis. Any filing made by an intervenor must be accompanied
by proof of service on all persons listed in the service list prepared
by the Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR
385.2010.

    Dated: July 26, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-16269 Filed 7-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P