[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7428-7430]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03408]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2017-1034; Airspace Docket No. 17-ANM-23]

Proposed Amendment of Class D and Class E Airspace; Aurora, OR

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class D airspace, Class E
surface area airspace, and Class E airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface, at Aurora State Airport, Aurora, OR. After a
biennial review the FAA found modification necessary to accommodate
airspace redesign for the safety and management of instrument flight
rules (IFR) operations at the airport. Additionally, an editorial
change would be made removing the city associated with the airport name
in the airspace designations. Also, this proposal would make an
editorial change to the Class D airspace legal description replacing
Airport/Facility Directory with the term Chart Supplement.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 9, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; telephone:
1-800-647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2017-1034; Airspace Docket No. 17-ANM-23, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11B at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Clark, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend Class D and Class E airspace at Aurora State Airport,
Aurora, OR to support IFR operations at the airport.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments

are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical,
economic, environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Persons wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2017-1034;
Airspace Docket No. 17-ANM-23''. The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Center, Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA
98057.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017, and effective
September 15, 2017. FAA Order 7400.11B is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11B lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by modifying Class D airspace, Class E
surface area airspace, and Class E airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface at Aurora State Airport, Aurora, OR.
    Class D airspace would be modified to a 4-mile radius of the
airport and within 1.8 miles each side of the 007[deg] bearing from the
airport extending from the 4-mile radius to 5.1 miles north of the
airport (from a 4.2-mile radius of the airport from the 64[deg] bearing
from the airport clockwise to the 142[deg] bearing, extending to a 5-
mile radius from the 142[deg] bearing clockwise to the 64[deg] bearing
from the airport). Two excluded area cutouts for Lenhardt Airpark and
McGee Airport, respectively, (both nearby satellite general aviation
airports) would be modified by excluding that airspace below 1,500 feet
MSL within the area bounded by lat. 45[deg]11'51'' N, long.
122[deg]45'45'' W; to lat. 45[deg]12'50'' N, long. 122[deg]44'34'' W;
to the point where the 142[deg] bearing from the airport intersects the
4-mile radius of the airport, thence clockwise along the airport 4-mile
radius to the 174[deg] bearing from the airport, thence to the point of
beginning; and excluding that airspace below 1,500 feet MSL within the
area bounded by lat. 45[deg]15'37'' N, long. 122[deg]51'14'' W; to the
point where the 235[deg] bearing from the airport intersects the 4-mile
radius of the airport, thence clockwise along the airport 4-mile radius
to the airport 281[deg] bearing, thence to the point of beginning''
(from ``excluding that airspace below 1,200 feet beyond 3.3 miles from
the airport from the 142[deg] bearing clockwise to the 174[deg]
bearing, and that airspace below 1,200 feet beyond 3.3 miles from the
airport from the 250[deg] bearing clockwise to the 266[deg] bearing
from the airport.'' The modification of the excluded areas within the
Class D provides additional airspace for visual flight rules operations
at the satellite airports while maintaining the required airspace to
support IFR operations at Aurora State Airport. Also, an editorial
change would be made to the Class D airspace legal description
replacing Airport/Facility Directory with the term Chart Supplement.
    Class E surface area airspace would be modified to be coincident
with the dimensions of the Class D airspace except no exclusion would
be provided in the vicinity of Lenhardt Airpark (``excluding that
airspace below 1,500 feet MSL within the area bounded by lat.
45[deg]11'51'' N, long. 122[deg]45'45'' W; to lat. 45[deg]12'50'' N,
long. 122[deg]44'34'' W; to the point where the 142[deg] bearing from
the airport intersects the 4-mile radius of the airport, thence
clockwise along the airport 4-mile radius to the 174[deg] bearing from
the airport, thence to the point of beginning''). Class E surface area
airspace is required within this Class D cutout to ensure Class E
weather requirements exist from the surface and protect IFR arrival
operations to Aurora State Airport.
    Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet would be modified
to within a 6.5-mile radius (from a 7-mile radius) from the airport
043[deg] bearing clockwise to the airport 350[deg] bearing and within a
9-mile radius (from a 6.5-mile radius) from the airport 350[deg]
bearing clockwise to the airport 043[deg] bearing, and within 1.6 miles
each side of a 007[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 9-
mile radius of the airport to 20.6 miles north of the airport (from
within 1.6 miles either side of the 007[deg] bearing from airport
extending from the 7-mile radius to 20 miles northeast of the airport),
and within 1.8 miles each side of a line extending from lat.
45[deg]21'12'' N, long. 122[deg]58'41'' W, to lat. 45[deg]19'20'' N,
long. 122[deg]49'07'' W (from within 1.2 miles either side of the
306[deg] bearing from airport extending from the 7-mile radius to 10.9
miles northwest of the airport).
    A graphic illustration of the proposed airspace will be entered
into Docket No. FAA-2017-1034, and available for download under the
``Supporting/Related Materials'' section.
    The airport designations for the Class D and E airspace areas also
would be amended by removing the name of the city associated with the
airport to be in compliance with a recent change to FAA Order 7400.2L,
Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters, effective October 12, 2017.
    Class D and Class E airspace designations are published in
paragraph 5000, 6002, and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order 7400.11B,
dated August 3, 2017, and effective September 15, 2017, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since
this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated,
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11B,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017, and
effective September 15, 2017, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

ANM OR D Aurora, OR [Amended]

Aurora State Airport, OR
    (Lat. 45[deg]14'50'' N, long. 122[deg]46'12'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
2,700 feet MSL within a 4-mile radius of Aurora State Airport and
within 1.8 miles each side of the 007[deg] bearing from the airport
extending from the 4-mile radius to 5.1 miles north of the airport,
excluding that airspace below 1,500 feet MSL within the area bounded
by lat. 45[deg]11'51'' N, long. 122[deg]45'45'' W; to lat.
45[deg]12'50'' N, long. 122[deg]44'34'' W; to the point where the
142[deg] bearing from the airport intersects the 4-mile radius of
the airport, thence clockwise along the airport 4-mile radius to the
174[deg] bearing from the airport, thence to the point of beginning,
and excluding that airspace below 1,500 feet MSL within the area
bounded by lat. 45[deg]15'37'' N, long. 122[deg]51'14'' W; to the
point where the 235[deg] bearing from the airport intersects the 4-
mile radius of the airport, thence clockwise along the airport 4-
mile radius to the airport 281[deg] bearing, thence to the point of
beginning. This Class D airspace area is effective during the
specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously
published in the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

ANM OR E2 Aurora, OR [Amended]

Aurora State Airport, OR
    (Lat. 45[deg]14'50'' N, long. 122[deg]46'12'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within a 4-mile
radius of Aurora State Airport and within 1.8 miles each side of the
007[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 4-mile radius
to 5.1 miles north of the airport, excluding that airspace below
1,500 feet MSL within the area bounded by lat. 45[deg]15'37'' N,
long. 122[deg]51'14'' W; to the point where the 235[deg] bearing
from the airport intersects the 4-mile radius of the airport, thence
clockwise along the airport 4-mile radius to the airport 281[deg]
bearing, thence to the point of beginning.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ANM OR E5 Aurora, OR [Amended]

Aurora State Airport, OR
    (Lat. 45[deg]14'50'' N, long. 122[deg]46'12'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 9-mile radius of the Aurora State Airport from a 350[deg]
bearing from the airport clockwise to a 043[deg] bearing from the
airport, and within a 6.5-mile radius of the airport from the
airport 043[deg] bearing clockwise to the airport 350[deg] bearing,
and within 1.6 miles each side of a 007[deg] bearing from the
airport extending from the 9-mile radius of the airport to 20.6
miles north of the airport, and within 1.8 miles each side of a line
extending from lat. 45[deg]21'12'' N, long. 122[deg]58'41'' W; to
lat. 45[deg]19'20'' N, long. 122[deg]49'07'' W.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on February 7, 2018.
B.G. Chew,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2018-03408 Filed 2-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15542-15544]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06090]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 64

[Docket ID FEMA-2013-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-8325]

Suspension of Community Eligibility

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule identifies communities where the sale of flood
insurance has been authorized under the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP) that are scheduled for suspension on the effective dates
listed within this rule because of noncompliance with the floodplain
management requirements of the program. If the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) receives documentation that the community has
adopted the required floodplain management measures prior to the
effective suspension date given in this rule, the suspension will not
occur and a notice of this will be provided by publication in the
Federal Register on a subsequent date. Also, information identifying
the current participation status of a community can be obtained from
FEMA's Community Status Book (CSB). The CSB is available at http://www.fema.gov/fema/csb.shtm.

DATES: The effective date of each community's scheduled suspension is
the third date (``Susp.'') listed in the third column of the following
tables.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you want to determine whether a
particular community was suspended on the suspension date or for
further information, contact David Stearrett, Federal Insurance and
Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP enables property owners to purchase
Federal flood insurance that is not otherwise generally available from
private insurers. In return, communities agree to adopt and administer
local floodplain management measures aimed at protecting lives and new
construction from future flooding. Section 1315 of the National Flood
Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4022, prohibits the sale
of NFIP flood insurance unless an appropriate public body adopts
adequate floodplain management measures with effective enforcement
measures. The communities listed in this document no longer meet that
statutory requirement for compliance with program regulations, 44 CFR
Part 59. Accordingly, the communities will be suspended on the
effective date in the third column. As of that date, flood insurance
will no longer be available in the community. We recognize that some of
these communities may adopt and submit the required documentation of
legally enforceable floodplain management measures after this rule is
published but prior to the actual suspension date. These communities
will not be suspended and will continue to be eligible for the sale of
NFIP flood insurance. A notice withdrawing the suspension of such
communities will be published in the Federal Register.
    In addition, FEMA publishes a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) that
identifies the Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) in these communities.
The date of the FIRM, if one has been published, is indicated in the
fourth column of the table. No direct Federal financial assistance
(except assistance pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act not in connection with a flood) may be
provided for construction or acquisition of buildings in identified
SFHAs for communities not participating in the NFIP and identified for
more than a year on FEMA's initial FIRM for the community as having
flood-prone areas (section 202(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act
of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4106(a), as amended). This prohibition against
certain types of Federal assistance becomes effective for the
communities listed on the date shown in the last column. The
Administrator finds that notice and public comment procedures under 5
U.S.C. 553(b), are impracticable and unnecessary because communities
listed in this final rule have been adequately notified.
    Each community receives 6-month, 90-day, and 30-day notification
letters addressed to the Chief Executive Officer stating that the
community will be suspended unless the required floodplain management
measures are met prior to the effective suspension date. Since these
notifications were made, this final rule may take effect within less
than 30 days.
    National Environmental Policy Act. This rule is categorically
excluded from the requirements of 44 CFR Part 10, Environmental
Considerations. No environmental impact assessment has been prepared.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. The Administrator has determined that
this

rule is exempt from the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
because the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, Section
1315, 42 U.S.C. 4022, prohibits flood insurance coverage unless an
appropriate public body adopts adequate floodplain management measures
with effective enforcement measures. The communities listed no longer
comply with the statutory requirements, and after the effective date,
flood insurance will no longer be available in the communities unless
remedial action takes place.
    Regulatory Classification. This final rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the criteria of section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 of September 30, 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR
51735.
    Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This rule involves no policies
that have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
    Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule meets the
applicable standards of Executive Order 12988.
    Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule does not involve any collection
of information for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 64

    Flood insurance, Floodplains.

    Accordingly, 44 CFR Part 64 is amended as follows:

PART 64--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for Part 64 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp.; p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR,
1979 Comp.; p. 376.

Sec.  64.6  [Amended]

0
2. The tables published under the authority of Sec.  64.6 are amended
as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                Effective date
                                                authorization/
                                  Community     cancellation of    Current effective map   Date certain federal
       State and location            No.         sale of flood             date            assistance no longer
                                                 insurance in                               available in SFHAs
                                                   community
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Region V

Indiana:
    Aurora, City of, Dearborn         185172  January 19, 1973,   April 16, 2014........  April 16, 2014
     County.                                   Emerg; April 6,
                                               1973, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
    Borden, Town of, Clark            180464  December 17, 1990,  ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; N/A, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
    Charlestown, City of, Clark       180025  October 16, 1975,   ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; November
                                               15, 1979, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
    Clark County,                     180426  September 15,       ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                     1975, Emerg;
                                               September 30,
                                               1980, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
    Clarksville, Town of, Clark       180026  October 15, 1971,   ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; August 3,
                                               1981, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
    Dearborn County,                  180038  April 3, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                     Emerg; September
                                               16, 1982, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
    Floyd County,                     180432  December 2, 1976,   ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                     Emerg; January 2,
                                               1981, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
    Greendale, City of,               180040  March 19, 1975,     ......do..............   Do.
     Dearborn County.                          Emerg; September
                                               16, 1982, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
    Jeffersonville, City of,          180027  June 20, 1974,      ......do..............   Do.
     Clark County.                             Emerg; August 1,
                                               1979, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
    Lawrenceburg, City of,            180041  December 27, 1974,  ......do..............   Do.
     Dearborn County.                          Emerg; September
                                               16, 1982, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
    New Albany, City of, Floyd        180062  October 1, 1971,    ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; December
                                               17, 1976, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
    Patriot, Town of,                 180309  May 5, 1975,        ......do..............   Do.
     Switzerland County.                       Emerg; December
                                               4, 1979, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
    Sellersburg, Town of, Clark       180028  August 14, 1975,    ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; August 1,
                                               1980, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
    Switzerland County,               180251  April 1, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                     Emerg; January
                                               16, 1980, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
    Utica, Town of, Clark             180487  February 12, 1982,  ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; February
                                               12, 1982, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
    Vevay, Town of, Switzerland       180352  April 1, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; December
                                               4, 1979, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
    West Harrison, Town of,           180042  October 1, 1975,    ......do..............   Do.
     Dearborn County.                          Emerg; January
                                               17, 1985, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
Ohio:
    Belpre, City of, Washington       390567  April 18, 1975,     ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; August 1,
                                               1980, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
    Beverly, Village of,              390568  March 25, 1975,     ......do..............   Do.
     Washington County.                        Emerg; August 1,
                                               1980, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
    Lowell, Village of,               390569  April 9, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     Washington County.                        Emerg; August 15,
                                               1980, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
    Lower Salem, Village of,          390570  February 24, 1975,  ......do..............   Do.
     Washington County.                        Emerg; November
                                               5, 1980, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
    Macksburg, Village of,            390571  April 23, 1975,     ......do..............   Do.
     Washington County.                        Emerg; August 15,
                                               1980, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
    Marietta, City of,                390572  June 4, 1975,       ......do..............   Do.
     Washington County.                        Emerg; February
                                               18, 1981, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.

    Washington County,                390566  December 24, 1975,  ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                     Emerg; February
                                               18, 1981, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
Wisconsin:
    Altoona, City of, Eau             550126  January 31, 1975,   ......do..............   Do.
     Claire County.                            Emerg; February
                                               18, 2009, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
    Chippewa County,                  555549  March 26, 1971,     ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                     Emerg; June 22,
                                               1973, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
    Eau Claire, City of,              550128  March 19, 1971,     ......do..............   Do.
     Chippewa and Eau Claire                   Emerg; June 1,
     Counties.                                 1977, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
    Eau Claire County,                555552  May 28, 1971,       ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                     Emerg; January
                                               12, 1973, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.

           Region VI

Texas:
    Bullard, City of, Smith           480568  June 11, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; April 24,
                                               1979, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
    Hideaway, City of, Smith          480200  N/A, Emerg;         ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   December 31,
                                               2008, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
    Lexington, Town of, Lee           480902  N/A, Emerg; July    ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   19, 2012, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
    Lindale, City of, Smith           480569  N/A, Emerg; March   ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   6, 2009, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
    Smith County,                     481185  January 5, 1979,    ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                     Emerg; July 2,
                                               1981, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
    Tyler, City of, Smith             480571  August 5, 1974,     ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; August 1,
                                               1980, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.

           Region VII

Iowa:
    Muscatine, City of,               190213  January 15, 1974,   ......do..............   Do.
     Muscatine County.                         Emerg; January 5,
                                               1978, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
    Muscatine County,                 190836  April 8, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                     Emerg; October
                                               17, 1986, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
Nebraska:
    Clarkson, City of, Colfax         310359  December 5, 1977,   ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; December
                                               18, 1986, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
    Colfax County,                    310426  March 31, 1978,     ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                     Emerg; February
                                               1, 1987, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
    Howells, Village of, Colfax       310380  May 22, 1978,       ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; June 2,
                                               1981, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
    Leigh, Village of, Colfax         310386  August 25, 1975,    ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; July 1,
                                               1987, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
    Rogers, Village of, Colfax        315497  November 30, 1990,  ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; September
                                               17, 1992, Reg;
                                               April 16, 2014,
                                               Susp.
    Schuyler, City of, Colfax         310046  August 30, 1974,    ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; March 5,
                                               1990, Reg; April
                                               16, 2014, Susp.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* do = Ditto.
Code for reading third column: Emerg.--Emergency; Reg.--Regular; Susp.--Suspension.

    Dated: March 7, 2014.
David L. Miller,
Associate Administrator, Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Administration, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014-06090 Filed 3-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


Edmond_ Toy@ omb. eop. gov To: Mary Kissell/ RTP/ USEPA/ US@ EPA cc: Arthur_ G._ Fraas@ omb. eop. gov, William_ Nickerson@ omb. eop. gov Subject: Re: follow up 11/ 06/ 03 11: 56 AM Hi Mary Tom,

Thanks for sending us those write ups... I'm still going through them.

In the meantime, I wanted to get back to you on the issue of averaging with PBCO. Based on your example, it is still not clear why averaging between regulated units should not be allowed.

|++| | | Press | Strand dryer | |++| | Production volume | 100,000 MSF| 65,000 ODT| |++| | Baseline emission rate | 3.0 lb/ MSF| 1.8 lb/ ODT| | without any intervention | | | | ( business as usual, no | | | | P2, no add on controls, | | | | etc). | | | |++| | PBCO emission standard | 0.3 lb/ MSF| 0.18 lb/ ODT| | ( 90% reduction from | | | | baseline) | | | |++| | Aggregate emissions after| 30,000 lbs.| 11,700 lbs.| | meeting PBCO | | | | ( std* production) | | | |++| | Total aggregate emissions| 41,700 lbs. | | |++| | | | | |++| | With averaging between | | | | regulated units | | | |++| | Controlled emission rate | 0.25 lb/ MSF| 0.2 lb/ ODT| | ( e. g., innovative P2 | | | | measures) | | | |++| | Aggregate emissions | 25,000 lbs.| 13,000 lbs.| | ( controlled emissions | | | | rate * production) | | | |++| | Total aggregate emissions| 38,000 lbs. | | |++|

With averaging between regulated units, the firm has the incentive to innovate and search for cost effective ways to reduce emissions. In this example, the firm finds that it is cheaper to concentrate its efforts on emissions from its press, overcomplying with the PBCO while undercomplying with the PBCO for the strand dryer. The example shows that the total aggregate emissions are lower than without averaging ( 38,000 vs. 41,700 lbs). This reduction in total aggregate emissions may not actually occur, since the firm has no incentive to undercomply in the aggregate, so the firm may decide to control its strand dryer to a lesser extent ( e. g., instead of 0.2 lb/ ODT, it could emit 0.257 lb/ ODT, thereby using up all of the " credits" generated by the press and leading to a total aggregate emissions level of 41,700 lbs).

Why shouldn't the firm be allowed to average across regulated units ( if it is cost effective to do so) if the total aggregate emissions from regulated units are at least as low compared to the case with no averaging?

We should talk about this more. Also, there are other types of averaging that we may need to discuss ( averaging between both regulated and non regulated units within PBCO... by non regulated I mean those without MACT floors; also what can generate credits in the EA approach which Art brought up when you came to brief us).

 Edmond Kissell. Mary@ epamail. epa. gov 11/ 03/ 2003 03: 10: 23 PM To: Edmond Toy/ OMB/ EOP cc: See the distribution list at the bottom of this message Subject: Re: follow up Edmond,

You had asked some questions and here are our responses. Hope these are helpful to you and cover all the follow up we had from our two meetings and one telephone conversation. Mary Tom, ( 919) 541 4516 1. RTO and RCO. Regenerative thermal oxidizers ( RTO) combust gas and recover some energy. RTOs incorporate ceramic beds at the inlet and outlet of the combustion chamber for up to 95 percent energy recovery. The primary difference between catalytic oxidation systems and thermal oxidation systems is that catalytic systems use a catalyst to increase the rate of the combustion reaction by allowing oxidation to occur at lower operating temperatures.

2. Cost savings in an emissions averaging standard that requires add on controls to generate emission credits. Emissions averaging ( EA) in the PCWP MACT has real cost saving opportunities. There are four ways EA can be used to reduce costs( 1) control only a portion of a regulated unit with MACT controls ( e. g., with onsite incineration or with a smaller RTO/ RCO/ BIO); ( 2) control a lower flow, more concentrated unregulated process unit ( e. g., blender, former, atmospheric refiner); ( 3) control an unregulated process unit that is easier to control ( lower moisture, lower particulate); and, ( 4) use a non MACT control device ( e. g., the AAT adsorption/ recovery device) that achieves less than 90 percent control. The first two options save money because you are controlling a lower flow rate stream and lower flow rate means the facility can use a smaller ( and presumably less costly) add on control. Or the facility may be able to route the lower flow stream to an onsite combustion unit ( which are usually limited in the volume of emissions they can treat). The third option saves money because lower flow is not the only factor affecting control costs; for example, it's cheaper to control a stream with low or no particulate than it is to control one that has a lot of particulate ( e. g., direct fired OSB dryer) since you may only need the HAP control device ( e. g., RTO) and not the up front particulate controls ( e. g. WESP). The same is true regarding moisture content a lower moisture content stream is more cost effective to incinerate. Also, EA would allow sources to use a less effective control device and some of these device may be cheaper.

3. Production based compliance option ( PBCO) and generating emissions credits. We had discussed whether a process unit that meets a PBCO limit and is under the limit could generate credits and use those credits to achieve the PBCO for another process unit. Allowing a facility to apply the unused portion of a PBCO from one process unit to a second process unit, so that the second process unit also achieve PBCO is less than MACT. I do not recommend this. Below is an example.

Press PBCO: 0.30 lb/ MSF 3/ 4" Example press processes 100,000 MSF 3/ 4" per year and emits 0.25 lb/ MSF 3/ 4" Difference in press PBCO and emissions is 0.30  0.25 = 0.05 lb/ MSF 3/ 4" Difference x throughput ( PBCO credit) is 100,000 x 0.05 = 5,000 lb/ yr Strand dryer PBCO: 0.18 lb/ ODT Example strand dryer processes 65,000 ODT/ yr and emits 0.20 lb/ ODT Uncontrolled strand dryer emissions: 65,000 x 0.20 = 13,000 lb/ yr Emissions allowed under PBCO: 65,000 x 0.18 = 11,700 lb/ yr Reduction to get under PBCO: 13,000  11,700 = 1,300 lb/ yr Reduction by 90% as required by MACT: 0.9 x 13,000 = 11,700 lb/ yr The 1,300 lb/ yr PBCO debit generated by the strand dryer could be offset by the 5,000 lb/ yr press PBCO credit; however, MACT would have required 11,700 lb/ yr reduction for the strand dryer emissions instead of 1,300 lb/ yr reduction.

4. Model plant parameters used in EPA risk assessments. Attached are two memos documenting how we estimated baseline organic HAP emissions and stack parameters for PCWP facilities. These estimates were used as inputs to EPA's rough risk analysis. In short, the baseline emissions were based on emission factors ( lb HAP/ production rate) developed from emission test data. Emission factors were developed for each HAP and for different process unit types. The emission factors were multiplied by process unit production rate to estimate emissions for each process unit. Facility emissions were determined by summing emissions estimated for each process unit at the facility. Information of the numbers and types of process units and their respective production rates was collected through our 1998 survey. We were not conservative with our baseline emission estimates; we simply performed the calculations using what the data showed.

The stack parameters were based on far less information than the baseline emission estimates and incorporate engineering judgement. We did not collect data on stack parameters or distance to the fenceline in our survey because we never envisioned needing this information. Typical process unit stack heights, diameters, and exit gas velocities were compiled from several title V permits and emission test reports. If data were not available for one type of process unit, data were used either from a similar process unit or from an average of similar process units retrieved from title V permits or emission test reports. The result was different stack parameters for different types of process units. For the risk analysis, we assumed two stacks with one stack representing one third of the emissions from the facility and having stack parameters similar to PCWP press stack parameters. The other stack was assigned two thirds of the facility emissions and " dryer" stack parameters. The model " dryer" parameters do not consider whether the dryer is an OSB rotary dryer, MDF tube dryer, or veneer dryer. The two stack assumption for the rough risk analysis may be very different from reality. In reality, PCWP plants have more than two stacks and the stack parameters can vary from stack to stack. For example, veneer dryers have multiple stacks per dryer, with multiple veneer dryers per facility in addition to the press. We did not attempt to make conservative assumptions with regard to stack parameters as inputs for the rough risk analysis. We used the typical stack parameters. These stack parameter assumptions used to create the model plant are good enough for generating impacts, but are too rough to be the basis of a facility specific low risk determination.

Also, in looking into this information for you, we realized that we had an input error for the stack diameters. The model was run with a stack diameter of 2.5 feet and should have been 5 ft for presses and 6 ft for dryers. We're uncertain how this will affect the impacts. We are re running the model to see how it changes the results. There was also a minor discrepancy with temperature ( 10o Kelvin difference), which we don't think will change the results.

5. HAP in EPA risk assessments. See attached table for comparison.

( See attached file: Baseline. wpd)( See attached file: Stack Parameter Documentation. wpd)( See attached file: PCWP HAPs 110303. wpd)

Edmond_ Toy@ omb. eop. gov To: Mary Kissell/ RTP/ USEPA/ US@ EPA cc: Subject: follow up 10/ 29/ 03 04: 20 PM Hi Mary,

From our conversation on Monday, there were two items still outstanding. First, you mentioned that you would check into the various parameters used in the risk assessment, eg, do the assumed stack heights represent the average? median? Second, a write up that describes the emissions data ( from where, how often are different data sources used, are they measured levels, how representative, etc).

Also, could you list the HAP that were included in the updated risk assessment ( the ones not included in the analysis at proposal)?

Please let me know.

Thanks.

 Edmond Message Copied To:_____________________________________________________________

thrift. mike@ epamail. epa. gov Chamberlin. Johnb@ epamail. epa. gov Throwe. Scott@ epamail. epa. gov Craig. Jeneva@ epamail. epa. gov Pagano. Dennis@ epamail. epa. gov Durkee. Stan@ epamail. epa. gov ( See attached file: pic32142. pcx)


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2168-2170]
[FR Doc No: 2023-00460]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2022-0108]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Notice and Request for
Comment; Older Driver Rearview Video Systems

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice and request for comments on a reinstatement of
previously approved information collection.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NHTSA invites public comments about our intention to request
approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for a
reinstatement with modification of a previously approved information
collection. Before a Federal agency can collect certain information
from the public, it must receive approval from OMB. Under procedures
established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, before seeking OMB
approval, Federal agencies must solicit public comment on proposed
collections of information, including extensions and reinstatement of
previously approved collections. This document describes a collection
of information for which NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval on Older
Driver Rearview Video Systems.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before March 13, 2023.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by the Docket No. NHTSA-
2022-0108 through any of the following methods:
     Electronic submissions: Go to the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail or Hand Delivery: Docket Management, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building, Room W12-
140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except on Federal holidays. To be sure someone is there to help
you, please call<PHONE_NUMBER> before coming.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit https://www.transportation.gov/privacy.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets via internet.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or access
to background documents, contact Kathy Sifrit, Ph.D., Contracting
Officer's Representative, Office of Behavioral Safety Research (NPD-
320), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, W46-470, Washington, DC 20590. Dr. Sifrit's phone number is
202-366-0868, and her email address is [email protected]. Please
identify the relevant collection of information by referring to its OMB
Control Number (2127-0731).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for approval, it must first publish a
document in the Federal Register providing a 60-day comment period and
otherwise consult with members of the public and affected agencies
concerning each proposed collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB's regulation (at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must
ask for public comment on the following: (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) how to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
and (d) how to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA
asks for public comments on the following proposed collection of
information for which the agency is seeking approval from OMB.
    Title: Older Driver Rearview Video Systems.
    OMB Control Number: 2127-0731.
    Form Number(s): Forms 1398 and 1399.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement with modification of a previously
approved information collection (OMB Control No. 2127-0731).
    Type of Review Requested: Regular.
    Requested Expiration Date of Approval: 3 years from date of
approval.
    Summary of the Collection of Information: The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation
is seeking approval to reinstate an information collection to recruit
120 older licensed drivers, 60 between ages 60 and 69 and 60 age 70 and
older, for a one-time voluntary research study to assess whether
training on the use of Rear Video Systems (RVS) improves the ability of
older drivers to back safely. NHTSA expects 180 volunteers will
complete screening over the telephone or in-person to determine their
eligibility for the study. Recruiting participants for the reinstated
collection has an estimated burden of 15 hours (five minutes per
respondent). NHTSA expects that among the 180 who are screened, 120
will be eligible and willing to participate in the study. These 120
participants will complete informed consent forms (15 minutes per
participant or 30 burden hours), participate in either RVS training or
an equal-time placebo group (30 minutes per participant or 60 burden
hours), and complete a series of backing tacks on a closed test-track
(60 minutes per participant or 120 burden hours). The overall expected
burden for screening (15 hours) and the experiment (210 hours) is 225
hours.
    NHTSA previously obtained clearance from OMB to conduct the
information collections for Parts 1 and 2 of this one-time study.
However, NHTSA was unable to complete Part 2 of the study as a result
of the public health emergency in 2020 and 2021. The requested
reinstatement is 135 fewer burden hours than the previous information
collection request because the requested reinstatement is for Part 2
only (120 participants and 225 hours) rather than Parts 1 and 2 (200
participants and 360 hours). The reinstatement requests fewer burden
hours because NHTSA previously completed the first part of this
collection by observing older drivers

while backing for the development of training. NHTSA is now requesting
a reinstatement to allow it to complete the second part, which assesses
the effects of the training. NHTSA will use the information to produce
a technical report containing summary statistics and tables and will
not report identifying information or individual responses. NHTSA will
make the technical report available to a variety of audiences
interested in improving highway safety through the agency website and
the National Transportation Library. This project involves approval by
an institutional review board, which the contractor will obtain before
contacting potential participants. This collection will inform the
development of behavioral safety countermeasures to improve older
driver safety, particularly older driver training.
    Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the
Information: Older adults comprise an increasing proportion of the
driving population.\1\ The independent mobility that driving confers
improves older adults' access to the goods and services they need and
enhances their ability to take part in community and family activities
that support quality of life. New vehicle technologies, like RVS, may
help compensate for some age-related deficits and keep older adults
driving safely.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2022, July).
2020 older population fact sheet. (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No.
DOT HS 813 341). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Available at https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812372.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The theory underpinning the assumption that older drivers have an
elevated safety risk associated with backing crashes is based upon
known age-related deficits. Many older drivers have musculoskeletal
difficulties that limit their ability to turn and scan behind the
vehicle. For example, Chen et al. (2015) found that older drivers had
less neck and trunk rotation and were less successful in detecting
targets requiring body rotation in a driving simulator.\2\ Aging also
diminishes the visual search, visual information processing, and
divided attention capabilities needed to be alert to possible conflicts
from cross traffic when backing from a driveway or parking space.
Deficits in visual scanning among older drivers have been reported in
numerous studies. For example, Pollatsek et al. (2012) found that older
drivers were less likely to focus their visual attention on areas with
potential hazards than younger experienced drivers at intersections in
a simulator and on-the-road.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Chen, K.B., Xu, X., Lin J.H., & Radwin, R.G. (2015).
``Evaluation of older driver head functional range of motion using
portable immersive virtual reality.'' Experimental gerontology, 70,
150-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2015.08.010.
    \3\ Pollatsek, A., Romoser, M.R., & Fisher, D.L. (2012).
``Identifying and remediating failures of selective attention in
older drivers.'' Current directions in psychological science, 21(1),
3-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429459.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An analysis of NHTSA's Non-Traffic Surveillance from 2012 through
2014 indicated that older drivers were involved in an estimated 19,000
backing crashes a year that resulted in death or injury. This
represented 22% of all non-traffic backing crashes. Older drivers
represented 17% of all licensed drivers but accounted for 22% of all
non-traffic backing crashes during this period, indicating an over-
representation in non-traffic backing crashes per licensed driver.
Studies have found that the most frequent error among older drivers
involved in crashes is failure to yield the right-of-way. For example,
Cicchino and McCartt (2015) found that ``the most frequent error made
by crash-involved drivers ages 70 and older was inadequate
surveillance, which included looking but not seeing and failing to
look.'' \4\ The fact that older drivers are at elevated risk of crashes
due to inadequate surveillance compared to younger drivers may explain
their over-representation in backing crashes per licensed driver.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Cicchino, J.B. and McCartt, A.T. (2015). ``Critical older
driver errors in a sample of serious U.S. crashes.'' Accident
analysis and prevention, 80, 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    RVS is expected to offer more potential benefits to older drivers
than younger drivers because older drivers have more room for
improvement due to the age-related decline in the ability to rotate
one's body. It may also compensate for the fact that older drivers are
more likely to have inadequate surveillance or scanning than younger
drivers. One published article addressed this question. Cichino (2017)
found that RVS reduced backing crash involvement among drivers 70 and
older by 36% compared to 16% for drivers younger than 70, but the
difference was not statistically significant. The study also found that
backing sensors reduced backing crash involvement for drivers 70 and
older by 38% compared to no effectiveness for drivers younger than 70,
which was a statistically significant difference.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Cichino, J.B. (2017). ``Effects of rearview cameras and rear
parking sensors on police-reported backing crashes.'' Traffic injury
prevention, 18(8), 859-865. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2017.1317758.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Affected Public: The potential respondent universe is comprised of
all residents of the New River Valley and Roanoke Valley regions in
Virginia who are age 60 and older. From this universe, the new data
collection screening questionnaire will be administered to an estimated
180 potential participants to qualify a total sample of 120 volunteer
drivers, 60 between ages 60 and 69 and 60 who are 70 and older.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: The study anticipates screening
180 potential participants to obtain 120 older drivers who meet study
inclusion criteria. NHTSA expects to collect information either over
the telephone or in-person from up to 180 potential participants to
determine their eligibility for the study. Based upon previous research
experience in the study area, an estimated 120 potential participants
(65% of those who respond to screener questions) will be eligible and
interested. The 120 participants are expected to consent and complete
the study.
    Frequency: This study is a one-time information collection, and
there will be no recurrence.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 225 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost: $6,057.
    The contractor will use a screening questionnaire (Form 1398) to
identify 120 drivers (60 between ages 60 and 69 and 60 age 70 and
older) who are properly qualified and choose to participate in the
study. Participants will answer the screening questionnaire items
either over the phone or in person to determine if they qualify for the
study. Respondents are expected to take an estimated average of 5
minutes to complete the initial screening resulting in 15 burden hours
for screening up to 180 potential participants. It is estimated that
65% of those who begin the screening process will be eligible and
interested in participating. As such, we anticipate screening up to 180
individuals to recruit an estimated 120 potential participants for the
consenting process. The consenting process includes an overview of the
study and an explanation of the form (Form 1399). Respondents are
expected to take an average of 15 minutes for the consenting process
including reviewing and completing the form resulting in 30 burden
hours. The 120 participants will complete study activities with an
estimated burden of 90 minutes per participant for a total estimated
burden of 180 hours.
    Table 1 describes the calculation of the estimated burden hours for
a total of 225 annual hours. To calculate the opportunity cost to
participants in this study, NHTSA used the average (mean)

hourly earnings from employers in all industry sectors in the State of
Virginia, which the Bureau of Labor Statistics lists at $28.92.\6\
NHTSA estimated the opportunity cost for each form (and associated
study activities) and arrived at a total opportunity cost of $6,057.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ May 2021. See https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_va.htm#00-0000.

                                            Table 1--Burden Estimates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Burden        Respondents    Total burden hours     Total labor costs
                                       (minutes) per    (reinstated        (reinstated           (reinstated
                                        respondent      collection)        collection)           collection)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Form 1398:
    Telephone Screening.............               5             180                    15                  $434
Form 1399:
    Informed Consent................              15  ..............                    30                   868
    Backing Performance Evaluation..              60             120                   120                 3,470
    Training Protocol/Placebo.......              30             120                    60                 1,735
                                     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Total Form 1399:............  ..............             120                   210                 6,073
                                     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Total estimated burden    ..............  ..............                   225                 6,057
             hours and labor costs..
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspects of
this information collection, including (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Department, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Department's estimate
of the burden of the proposed information collection; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35, as amended; 49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order 1351.29A.

Nanda Narayanan Srinivasan,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2023-00460 Filed 1-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 92 (Friday, May 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22080-22081]
[FR Doc No: 2018-10050]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-1726]

Circulatory System Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory
Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announces a forthcoming
public advisory committee meeting of the Circulatory System Devices
Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee. The general function
of the committee is to provide advice and recommendations to the Agency
on FDA's regulatory issues. The meeting will be open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on June 12, 2018, from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hilton Washington, DC North/Gaithersburg, Salons A, B, C,
and D, 620 Perry Pkwy., Gaithersburg, MD 20877. The hotel's telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Answers to commonly asked questions including
information regarding special accommodations due to a disability,
visitor parking, and transportation may be accessed at: https://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm408555.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evella Washington, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. G640, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
[email protected];<PHONE_NUMBER>, or FDA Advisory Committee
Information Line, 1-800-741-8138<PHONE_NUMBER> in the Washington, DC
area). A notice in the Federal Register about last minute modifications
that impact a previously announced advisory committee meeting cannot
always be published quickly enough to provide timely notice. Therefore,
you should always check the Agency's website at https://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm and scroll down to the appropriate
advisory committee meeting link, or call the advisory committee

information line to learn about possible modifications before coming to
the meeting.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Agenda: On June 12, 2018, the committee will discuss, make
recommendations, and vote on the premarket approval application
sponsored by Cordis, Inc. for the INCRAFT AAA Stent Graft System, which
is intended for the endovascular treatment of infra-renal abdominal
aortic aneurysms in patients with appropriate anatomy. The INCRAFT
device is being evaluated in the INSPIRATION study, a multicenter,
prospective, non-randomized investigation. The study met its primary
safety and effectiveness endpoints, but results also showed higher than
anticipated rates of certain adverse events. The committee discussion
will focus on how these events impact the long-term safety and
effectiveness, as well as the benefit/risk profile of the device.
    FDA intends to make background material available to the public no
later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post
the background material on its website prior to the meeting, the
background material will be made publicly available at the location of
the advisory committee meeting, and the background material will be
posted on FDA's website after the meeting. Background material is
available at https://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/Calendar/default.htm. Scroll down to the appropriate advisory committee meeting
link.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee.
Written submissions may be made to the contact person on or before June
5, 2018. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled on June
12, 2018, between approximately 1 p.m. and 2 p.m. Those individuals
interested in making formal oral presentations should notify the
contact person and submit a brief statement of the general nature of
the evidence or arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses
of proposed participants, and an indication of the approximate time
requested to make their presentation on or before May 25, 2018. Time
allotted for each presentation may be limited. If the number of
registrants requesting to speak is greater than can be reasonably
accommodated during the scheduled open public hearing session, FDA may
conduct a lottery to determine the speakers for the scheduled open
public hearing session. The contact person will notify interested
persons regarding their request to speak by May 29, 2018.
    Persons attending FDA's advisory committee meetings are advised
that the Agency is not responsible for providing access to electrical
outlets.
    FDA welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory committee
meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons with
disabilities. If you require accommodations due to a disability, please
contact AnnMarie Williams at [email protected], 301-796-
5966 at least 7 days in advance of the meeting.
    FDA is committed to the orderly conduct of its advisory committee
meetings. Please visit our website at https://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm111462.htm for procedures
on public conduct during advisory committee meetings.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: May 7, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-10050 Filed 5-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13725-13728]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04979]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2021-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2117]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Federal
Regulations. The LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will be finalized on the dates
listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS report in
effect prior to this determination for the listed communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has 90 days in
which to request through the community that the Deputy Associate
Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Chief executive officer of                                    Online location of letter of map                            Community
         State and county          Location and case No.            community              Community map  repository                  revision                Date of modification       No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama:
    Madison......................  City of Huntsville     The Honorable Thomas Battle,   City Hall, 308 Fountain        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         May 20, 2021..........       010153
                                    (19-04-5211P).         Jr., Mayor, City of            Circle, 8th Floor,             advanceSearch.
                                                           Huntsville, 308 Fountain       Huntsville, AL 35801.
                                                           Circle, 8th Floor,
                                                           Huntsville, AL 35801.
    Madison......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Dale W. Strong,  Engineering Department, 100    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         May 20, 2021..........       010151
                                    of Madison County      Chairman, Madison County       Hughes Road, Madison, AL       advanceSearch.
                                    (19-04-5211P).         Commission, 100 North Side     35758.
                                                           Square, Huntsville, AL
                                                           35801.
Arizona:
    Mohave.......................  City of Lake Havasu    The Honorable Cal S. Sheehy,   Development Services           https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jun. 3, 2021..........       040116
                                    City (20-09-1801P).    Mayor, City of Lake Havasu     Department, 2330 McCulloch     advanceSearch.
                                                           City, 2330 McCulloch           Boulevard North, Lake Havasu
                                                           Boulevard North, Lake Havasu   City, AZ 86403.
                                                           City, AZ 86403.
    Mohave.......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Buster Johnson,  Mohave County Flood Control    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jun. 3, 2021..........       040058
                                    of Mohave County (20-  Chairman, Mohave County        District, 3250 East Kino       advanceSearch.
                                    09-1801P).             Board of Supervisors, 2001     Avenue, Kingman, AZ 86409.
                                                           College Drive, Suite 90,
                                                           Lake Havasu City, AZ 86403.
Colorado:
    El Paso......................  City of Colorado       The Honorable John Suthers,    Pikes Peak Regional            https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jun. 17, 2021.........       080060
                                    Springs (20-08-        Mayor, City of Colorado        Development Center, 2880       advanceSearch.
                                    0838P).                Springs, 30 South Nevada       International Circle,
                                                           Avenue, Suite 601, Colorado    Colorado Springs, CO 80910.
                                                           Springs, CO 80903.
    El Paso......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Stan             Pikes Peak Regional            https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jun. 14, 2021.........       080059
                                    of El Paso County      VanderWerf, Chairman, El       Development Center, 2880       advanceSearch.
                                    (20-08-0750P).         Paso County Board of           International Circle,
                                                           Commissioners, 200 South       Colorado Springs, CO 80910.
                                                           Cascade Avenue, Suite 100,
                                                           Colorado Springs, CO 80903.
    Weld.........................  Town of Severance (20- The Honorable Donald McLeod,   Town Hall, 3 South Timber      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jun. 10, 2021.........       080317
                                    08-0596P).             Mayor, Town of Severance, 3    Ridge Parkway, Severance, CO   advanceSearch.
                                                           South Timber Ridge Parkway,    80550.
                                                           Severance, CO 80550.
Connecticut: Hartford............  Town of Simsbury (20-  Ms. Maria Capriola, Town of    Town Hall, 933 Hopmeadow       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jun. 3, 2021..........       090035
                                    01-1155P).             Simsbury Manager, 933          Street, Simsbury, CT 06070.    advanceSearch.
                                                           Hopmeadow Street, Simsbury,
                                                           CT 06070.
Florida:
    Collier......................  City of Naples (20-04- The Honorable Teresa L.        Building Department, 295       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         May 13, 2021..........       125130
                                    6275P).                Heitmann, Mayor, City of       Riverside Circle, Naples, FL   advanceSearch.
                                                           Naples, 735 8th Street         34102.
                                                           South, Naples, FL 34102.
    Miami-Dade...................  City of Sunny Isles    The Honorable George ``Bud''   Building Department, 18070     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jun. 1, 2021..........       120688
                                    Beach (20-04-5872P).   Scholl, Mayor, City of Sunny   Collins Avenue, Sunny Isles    advanceSearch.
                                                           Isles Beach, 18070 Collins     Beach, FL 33160.
                                                           Avenue, Sunny Isles Beach,
                                                           FL 33160.
    Monroe.......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Michelle         Monroe County Building         https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jun. 14, 2021.........       125129
                                    of Monroe (21-04-      Coldiron, Mayor, Monroe        Department, 2798 Overseas      advanceSearch.
                                    0609P).                County Board of                Highway, Suite 300,
                                                           Commissioners, 25 Ships Way,   Marathon, FL 33050.
                                                           Big Pine Key, FL 33042.
    Monroe.......................  Village of Islamorada  The Honorable Buddy Pinder,    Building Department, 86800     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         May 27, 2021..........       120424
                                    (21-04-0284P).         Mayor, Village of              Overseas Highway,              advanceSearch.
                                                           Islamorada, 86800 Overseas     Islamorada, FL 33036.
                                                           Highway, Islamorada, FL
                                                           33036.
    Orange.......................  City of Orlando (20-   The Honorable Buddy W. Dyer,   Public Works Department,       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         May 18, 2021..........       120186
                                    04-5596P).             Mayor, City of Orlando, P.O.   Engineering Division, 400      advanceSearch.
                                                           Box 4990, Orlando, FL 32802.   South Orange Avenue, 8th
                                                                                Floor, Orlando, FL 32801.

    Pinellas.....................  City of Clearwater     Mr. William Horne, City of     Engineering Department, 100    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jun. 17, 2021.........       125096
                                    (20-04-6149P).         Clearwater Manager, P.O. Box   South Myrtle Avenue, Suite     advanceSearch.
                                                           4748, Clearwater, FL 33756.    220, Clearwater, FL 33756.
Georgia: Columbia................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Douglas R.       Columbia County Engineering    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         May 26, 2021..........       130059
                                    of Columbia County     Duncan, Jr., Chairman,         Services Division, 630         advanceSearch.
                                    (20-04-3795P).         Columbia County Board of       Ronald Reagan Drive,
                                                           Commissioners, 630 Ronald      Building A, Evans, GA 30809.
                                                           Reagan Drive, Building B,
                                                           Evans, GA 30809.
North Carolina:
    Chatham......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Mike Dasher,     Chatham County Planning        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Apr. 23, 2021.........       370299
                                    of Chatham County      Chairman, Board of County      Department, 80-A East          advanceSearch.
                                    (20-04-3030P).         Commissioners, Chatham         Street, Pittsboro, NC,
                                                           County, 2 East Street,         27312.
                                                           Pittsboro, NC 27312.
    Mecklenburg..................  City of Charlotte (20- The Honorable Vi Alexander     Mecklenburg County,            https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Apr. 7, 2021..........       370159
                                    04-3344P).             Lyles, Mayor, City of          Stormwater Services            advanceSearch.
                                                           Charlotte, 600 East 4th        Department, 2145 Suttle
                                                           Street, Charlotte, NC 28202.   Avenue, Charlotte, NC 28202.
Pennsylvania:
    Montgomery...................  Township of Upper      Mr. Ira S. Tackel, President,  Community Planning and Zoning  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         May 24, 2021..........       420708
                                    Dublin (20-03-         Township of Upper Dublin       Department, 801 Loch Alsh      advanceSearch.
                                    0912P).                Board of Commissioners, 801    Avenue, Fort Washington, PA
                                                           Loch Alsh Avenue, Fort         19034.
                                                           Washington, PA 19034.
    Montgomery...................  Township of            Ms. Laura Boyle-Nester,        Township Hall, 616 Germantown  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         May 24, 2021..........       420712
                                    Whitemarsh (20-03-     Chair, Township of             Pike, Lafayette Hill, PA       advanceSearch.
                                    0912P).                Whitemarsh Board of            19444.
                                                           Supervisors, 616 Germantown
                                                           Pike, Lafayette Hill, PA
                                                           19444.
South Carolina:
    Berkeley.....................  Town of Moncks Corner  The Honorable Michael          Town Hall, 118 Carolina        https://msc.fema.gov/port            Jun. 10, 2021.........       450031
                                    (20-04-4527P).         Lockliear, Mayor, Town of      Avenue, Moncks Corner, SC
                                                           Moncks Corner, 118 Carolina    29461.
                                                           Avenue, Moncks Corner, SC
                                                           29461.
    Berkeley.....................  Unincorporated areas   Mr. John Cribb, Berkeley       Berkeley County                https://msc.fema.gov/port            Jun. 10, 2021.........       450029
                                    of Berkeley County     County Supervisor, 1003        Administration Building,
                                    (20-04-4527P).         Highway 52, Moncks Corner,     1003 Highway 52, Moncks
                                                           SC 29461.                      Corner, SC 29461.
    Charleston...................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Teddie E.        Charleston County Building     https://msc.fema.gov/port            Jun. 14, 2021.........       455413
                                    of Charleston County   Pryor, Sr., Chairman,          Inspections Department, 4045
                                    (21-04-0473P).         Charleston County Council,     Bridge View Drive, North
                                                           2700 Crestline Drive, North    Charleston, SC 29405.
                                                           Charleston, SC 29405.
Texas:
    Bexar and Guadalupe..........  City of Selma (20-06-  The Honorable Tom Daly,        Geographic Information         https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         May 10, 2021..........       480046
                                    1874P).                Mayor, City of Selma, 9375     Systems (GIS) Department,      advanceSearch.
                                                           Corporate Drive, Selma, TX     9375 Corporate Drive, Selma,
                                                           78154.                         TX 78154.
    Bexar........................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Nelson W.        Bexar County Public Works      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         May 10, 2021..........       480035
                                    of Bexar County (20-   Wolff, Bexar County Judge,     Department, 1948 Probandt      advanceSearch.
                                    06-1284P).             101 West Nueva Street, 10th    Street, San Antonio, TX
                                                           Floor, San Antonio, TX         78214.
                                                           78205.
    Collin and Denton............  City of Celina (20-06- The Honorable Sean Terry,      City Hall, 142 North Ohio      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         May 17, 2021..........       480133
                                    2234P).                Mayor, City of Celina, 142     Street, Celina, TX 75009.      advanceSearch.
                                                           North Ohio Street, Celina,
                                                           TX 75009.
    Collin.......................  City of Princeton (20- Mr. Derek Borg, City of        City Hall, 123 West Princeton  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Apr. 30, 2021.........       480757
                                    06-2556P).             Princeton Manager, 123 West    Drive, Princeton, TX 75407.    advanceSearch.
                                                           Princeton Drive, Princeton,
                                                           TX 75407.
    Collin.......................  City of Sachse (20-06- Ms. Gina Nash, City of Sachse  Engineering Department, 3815   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jun. 4, 2021..........       480186
                                    2901P).                Manager, 3815 Sachse Road,     Sachse Road, Building B,       advanceSearch.
                                                           Building B, Sachse, TX         Sachse, TX 75048.
                                                           75048.

    Collin.......................  City of Wylie (20-06-  The Honorable Matthew Porter,  Engineering Department, 300    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jun. 4, 2021..........       480759
                                    2901P).                Mayor, City of Wylie, 300      Country Club Road, Building    advanceSearch.
                                                           Country Club Road, Building    100, Wylie, TX 75098.
                                                           100, Wylie, TX 75098.
    Collin and Denton............  Town of Prosper (20-   The Honorable Ray Smith,       Engineering Services           https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         May 24, 2021..........       480141
                                    06-1821P).             Mayor, Town of Prosper, P.O.   Department, 250 West 1st       advanceSearch.
                                                           Box 307, Prosper, TX 75078.    Street, Prosper, TX 75078.
    Collin.......................  Town of Prosper (20-   The Honorable Ray Smith,       Engineering Services           https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         May 17, 2021..........       480141
                                    06-2234P).             Mayor, Town of Prosper, P.O.   Department, 250 West 1st       advanceSearch.
                                                           Box 307, Prosper, TX 75078.    Street, Prosper, TX 75078.
    Comal........................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Sherman Krause,  Comal County Engineering       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         May 20, 2021..........       485463
                                    of Comal County (20-   Comal County Judge, 100 Main   Department, 195 David Jonas    advanceSearch.
                                    06-1966P).             Plaza, New Braunfels, TX       Drive, New Braunfels, TX
                                                           78130.                         78132.
    Denton.......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Andy Eads,       Denton County Development      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         May 24, 2021..........       480774
                                    of Denton County (20-  Denton County Judge, 110       Services Department, 3900      advanceSearch.
                                    06-1821P).             West Hickory Street, 2nd       Morse Street, Denton, TX
                                                           Floor, Denton, TX 76201.       76208.
    Denton.......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Andy Eads,       Denton County Development      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         May 17, 2021..........       480774
                                    of Denton County (20-  Denton County Judge, 110       Services Department, 3900      advanceSearch.
                                    06-2234P).             West Hickory Street, 2nd       Morse Street, Denton, TX
                                                           Floor, Denton, TX 76201.       76208.
    Lubbock......................  City of Lubbock (20-   The Honorable Dan Pope,        Engineering Department, 1314   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jun. 10, 2021.........       480452
                                    06-2140P).             Mayor, City of Lubbock, P.O.   Avenue K, 7th Floor,           advanceSearch.
                                                           Box 2000, Lubbock, TX 79457.   Lubbock, TX 79401.
    Lubbock......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Curtis Parrish,  Lubbock County Public Works    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jun. 10, 2021.........       480915
                                    of Lubbock County      Lubbock County Judge, 904      Department, 904 Broadway       advanceSearch.
                                    (20-06-2140P).         Broadway Street, Suite 101,    Street, Lubbock, TX 79401.
                                                           Lubbock, TX 79401.
Virginia: Loudoun................  Unincorporated areas   Mr. Tim Hemstreet, Loudoun     Loudoun County Mapping and     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jun. 14, 2021.........       510090
                                    of Loudoun County      County Administrator, P.O.     Geographic Information (GIS)   advanceSearch.
                                    (20-03-1253P).         Box 7000, Leesburg, VA         Department, 1 Harrison
                                                           20177.                         Street Southeast, Leesburg,
                                                                                VA 20177.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2021-04979 Filed 3-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P