[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 37 (Monday, February 25, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5998-5999]
[FR Doc No: 2019-03172]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC19-59-000.
    Applicants: Crius Energy Corporation, Vistra Energy Corp.
    Description: Application for Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act, et al. of Crius Energy Corporation, et al.
    Filed Date: 2/19/19.
    Accession Number: 20190219-5096.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/19.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER17-532-001.
    Applicants: PPA Grand Johanna LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of PPA Grand
Johanna LLC.
    Filed Date: 2/19/19.
    Accession Number: 20190219-5121.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-848-001.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Service Agreement No. 371--TOUA
Revision to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/19/19.
    Accession Number: 20190219-5154.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1069-000.
    Applicants: Northland Power Energy Marketing (US) Inc.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for Market Based
Rate to be effective 2/28/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/19/19.
    Accession Number: 20190219-5099.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1070-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of WMPA SA
No. 4848; Queue No. AB2-166 to be effective 3/11/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/19/19.
    Accession Number: 20190219-5107.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1071-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-02-19_SA 2894 Ameren-
Gibson City GIA (J339 J734) to be effective 2/19/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/19/19.
    Accession Number: 20190219-5109.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1072-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Texas, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: ETI-ETEC Wholesale
Distribution Service Agreement to be effective 3/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/19/19.
    Accession Number: 20190219-5125.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1073-000.
    Applicants: Alta Wind VIII, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Baseline Market-Based Rate Tariff
Refiling and Request for Administrative Cancel to be effective 10/16/
2017.
    Filed Date: 2/19/19.
    Accession Number: 20190219-5153.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1074-000.
    Applicants: Brookfield Energy Marketing Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: Baseline Market-Based Rate Tariff
Refiling and Request for Administrative Cancel to be effective 10/16/
2017.
    Filed Date: 2/19/19.
    Accession Number: 20190219-5156.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1075-000.
    Applicants: Brookfield Renewable Energy Marketing U.S.
    Description: Compliance filing: Baseline Market-Based Rate Tariff
Refiling and Request for Administrative Cancel to be effective 10/16/
2017.
    Filed Date: 2/19/19.
    Accession Number: 20190219-5169.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1076-000.
    Applicants: Windstar Energy, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Baseline Market-Based Rate Tariff

Refiling and Request for Administrative Cancel to be effective 10/16/
2017.
    Filed Date: 2/19/19.
    Accession Number: 20190219-5171.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1077-000.
    Applicants: Wildcat Wind Farm I, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Reactive Power Compensation
Filing to be effective 4/20/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/19/19.
    Accession Number: 20190219-5182.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1078-000.
    Applicants: PPA Grand Johanna LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revised Market Based Rate
Tariff Filing to be effective 2/20/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/19/19.
    Accession Number: 20190219-5183.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1079-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of WMPA SA
No. 4847, Queue No. AB2-084 to be effective 4/2/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/19/19.
    Accession Number: 20190219-5184.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/19.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 19, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-03172 Filed 2-22-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 203 (Monday, October 25, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58794-58795]
[FR Doc No: 2021-22948]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0520; Airspace Docket No. 21-ASO-17]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment and Establishment of Class D and E Airspace; Concord,
NC

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends Class D airspace, establishes Class E
airspace designated as an extension to a Class D surface area, and
amends Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface at Concord-Padgett Regional Airport, Concord, NC. The FAA is
taking this action as a result of the Charlotte Class B Biennial
Review. This action also updates the airport's name to Concord-Padgett
Regional Airport (formerly Concord Regional Airport). In addition, this
action updates the geographic coordinates of the airport to coincide
with the FAA's database. This action also makes an editorial change
replacing the term Airport/Facility Directory with the term Chart
Supplement in the legal descriptions of associated Class D airspace.
Controlled airspace is necessary for the safety and management of
instrument flight rules (IFR) in the area.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, January 27, 2022. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11
and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; Telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order JO 7400.11F at NARA, email
[email protected] or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 1701
Columbia Ave., College Park, GA 30337; Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it establishes and amends Class D and E airspace in Concord, NC.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (86 FR 35237, July 2, 2021) for Docket No. FAA-2021-0520 to
amend Class D airspace, establish Class E airspace designated as an
extension to a Class D surface area, and amend Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Concord-Padgett
Regional Airport, Concord, NC. In addition, the FAA proposed to update
the geographic coordinates of the airport to coincide with the FAA's
database, and make an editorial change replacing the term Airport/
Facility Directory with the term Chart Supplement in the legal
description of associated Class D airspace.
    Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received.
    Class D and Class E airspace designations are published in
Paragraphs 5000, 6004, and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order JO
7400.11F, dated August 10, 2021, and effective September 15, 2021,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, dated August 10, 2021, and effective September
15, 2021. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F lists Class
A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic routes, and reporting
points.

The Rule

    The FAA is amending 14 CFR part 71 by amending the Class D airspace
and Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
at Concord-Padgett Regional Airport, Concord, NC, by updating the
airport's name to Concord-Padgett Regional Airport, (formerly Concord
Regional Airport), and updating the geographical coordinates to
coincide with the FAA's database. In addition, this action amends Class
E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Concord-
Padgett Regional Airport, Concord, NC, by increasing the radius to 8.8
miles (formerly 6.5 miles). This action also establishes Class E
airspace designated as an extension to a Class D surface area airspace
for Concord-Padgett Regional Airport within 1 mile each side of the
010[deg] bearing from the Concord-Padgett Regional Airport, extending
from the 4.0-mile radius to 6.3 miles northeast of the airport, and
within 1 mile each side of the 190[deg] bearing from the airport,
extending from the 4.0-mile radius to 6.3 miles southwest from the
airport. In addition, the FAA replaces the outdated term Airport/
Facility Directory with the term Chart Supplement in the associated
Class D airspace in the legal descriptions for Concord-Padgett Regional
Airport.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. It
therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated

impact is minimal. Since this is a routine matter that only affects air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule,
when promulgated, does not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

ASO NC D Concord, NC [Amended]

Concord-Padgett Regional Airport, NC
    (Lat. 35[deg]23'16'' N, long. 80[deg]42'33'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
3,200 feet MSL within a 4-mile radius of Concord-Padgett Regional
Airport. This Class D airspace area is effective during the specific
dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The
effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in
the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Designated as an Extension to Class
D or E Surface Area.

* * * * *

ASO NC E4 Concord, NC [New]

Concord-Padgett Regional Airport, NC
    (Lat. 35[deg]23'16'' N, long. 80[deg]42'33'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 1 mile
each side of the 010[deg] bearing from the Concord-Padgett Regional
Airport, extending from the 4.0-mile radius to 6.3 miles northeast
of the airport, and within 1 mile each side of the 190[deg] bearing
from the airport, extending from the 4.0-mile radius to 6.3 miles
southwest of the airport. This Class E airspace area is effective
during the specific dates and times established in advance by a
Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be
continuously published in the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASO NC E5 Concord, NC [Amended]

Concord-Padgett Regional Airport, NC
    (Lat. 35[deg]23'16'' N, long. 80[deg]42'33'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within an 8.8-mile radius of the Concord-Padgett Regional Airport.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on October 15, 2021.
Andreese C. Davis,
Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team South, Eastern Service Center, Air
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2021-22948 Filed 10-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


I would like to go over these recent comments on Monday at 11am within ESD before distributing to all of the WG. W may need to talk to Sally on a couple of issues but at this point I am not willing to continue to go through multiple iterations with the WG before reaching resolution with OMB.

OMB has requested another meeting on Monday at 2: 00pm.

 Forwarded by Steve Fruh/ RTP/ USEPA/ US on 05/ 07/ 2004 07: 24 PM

Edmond_ Toy@ omb. e op. gov 05/ 07/ 2004 04: 37 PM To: Fruh. Steve@ epamail. epa cc: Arthur_ G._ Fraas@ omb. e Nancy_ Beck@ omb. eop. gov Subject: Additional coke oven com Steve... here's a redline, based on the last WP version you emailed us.

( See attached file: CORR_ May5 omb. pdf)

CORR_ May5 omb. pdf


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 40055]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17013]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC15-164-000.
    Applicants: Alta Windpower Development, LLC, Cameron Ridge, LLC,
Chandler Wind Partners, LLC, Coso Geothermal Power Holdings, LLC, Foote
Creek II, LLC, Foote Creek III, LLC, Foote Creek IV, LLC, Oak Creek
Wind Power, LLC, ON Wind Energy LLC, Pacific Crest Power, LLC, Ridge
Crest Wind Partners, LLC, Ridgetop Energy, LLC, Sagebrush, a California
partnership, Terra-Gen Dixie Valley, LLC, Terra-Gen Energy Services,
LLC, TGP Energy Management, LLC, Victory Garden Phase IV, LLC, San
Gorgonio West Winds II, LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization for Disposition of
Jurisdictional Facilities and Request for Expedited Action of Alta
Windpower Development, LLC, et. al.
    Filed Date: 7/7/15.
    Accession Number: 20150707-5118.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/28/15.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER13-107-009.
    Applicants: South Carolina Electric & Gas Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: Order 1000 Regional Compliance
filing 7-6-15 to be effective 4/19/2013.
    Filed Date: 7/6/15.
    Accession Number: 20150706-5188.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/27/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-2113-000.
    Applicants: Louisville Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Att I Revision NITS
Customers to be effective 7/8/2015.
    Filed Date: 7/7/15.
    Accession Number: 20150707-5075.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/28/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-2114-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., Transource West Virginia,
LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Transource West Virginia
submits Attachment H Formula Rate Template & Protocols to be effective
9/5/2015.
    Filed Date: 7/7/15.
    Accession Number: 20150707-5116.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/28/15.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
reliability filings:
    Docket Numbers: RR15-2-002.
    Applicants: North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
    Description: Compliance Filing of the North American Electric
Reliability Corporation and Petition for Approval of Rules of Procedure
Revisions.
    Filed Date: 7/6/15.
    Accession Number: 20150706-5277.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/27/15.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 7, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-17013 Filed 7-10-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: June 6, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 108)]
[Notices]
[Page 31360-31361]
[DOCID:fr06jn07-134]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-55836; File No. SR-ISE-2007-31]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Relating to Fee Changes

May 31, 2007.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on May 2, 2007, the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been substantially
prepared by the ISE. The ISE has designated this proposal as one
establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge applicable only to
a member under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon filing
with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The ISE is proposing to amend its Schedule of Fees to establish
fees for transactions in options on two Premium Products.\5\ The text
of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange, the
Commission's Public Reference Room, and at http://www.iseoptions.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ ``Premium Products'' is defined in the Schedule of Fees as
the products enumerated therein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the ISE included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The ISE has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is proposing to amend its Schedule of Fees to
establish fees for transactions in options on the following two Premium
Products: Rydex S&P Equal Weight ETF (``RSP'') \6\ and iShares Goldman
Sachs Semiconductor Index Fund (``IGW'').\7\ The Exchange represents
that RSP and IGW are eligible for options trading because they
constitute ``Fund Shares,'' as defined by ISE Rule 502(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ ``Standard & Poor's[supreg],'' ``S&P[supreg],'' ``S&P
500[supreg],'' ``Standard & Poor's 500,'' ``500,'' and ``S&P 500
Equal Weight Index'' are trademarks of The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc. (``McGraw-Hill'') and have been licensed for use by Rydex
Global Advisors and its affiliates (``Rydex''). RSP is not
sponsored, sold, promoted or endorsed by S&P, a division of McGraw-
Hill, and S&P makes no representation regarding the advisability of
investing in RSP. All other trademarks, service marks, or registered
trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Neither
Rydex nor S&P have licensed or authorized ISE to (i) Engage in the
creation, listing, provision of a market for trading, marketing, and
promotion of options on RSP or (ii) use and refer to any of their
trademarks or service marks in connection with the listing,
provision of a market for trading, marketing, and promotion of
options on RSP or with making disclosures concerning options on RSP
under any applicable federal or state laws, rules or regulations.
Rydex and S&P do not sponsor, endorse, or promote such activity by
ISE and are not affiliated in any manner with ISE.
    \7\ iShares[supreg] is a registered trademark of Barclays Global
Investors, N.A. (``BGI''), a wholly owned subsidiary of Barclays
Bank PLC. ``Goldman Sachs'' and ``Goldman Sachs Technology Industry
Semiconductor Index'' are service marks of Goldman Sachs and Co.
(``Goldman Sachs'') and have been licensed for use for certain
purposes by BGI. IGW is not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by
Goldman Sachs, and Goldman Sachs makes no representation regarding
the advisability of investing in IGW. All other trademarks, service
marks or registered trademarks are the property of their respective
owners. Neither BGI nor Goldman Sachs have licensed or authorized
ISE to (i) Engage in the creation, listing, provision of a market
for trading, marketing, and promotion of options on IGW or (ii) use
and refer to any of their trademarks or service marks in connection
with the listing, provision of a market for trading, marketing, and
promotion of options on IGW or with making disclosures concerning
options on IGW under any applicable federal or state laws, rules or
regulations. BGI and Goldman Sachs do not sponsor, endorse, or
promote such activity by ISE and are not affiliated in any manner
with ISE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    All of the applicable fees covered by this filing are identical to
fees charged by the Exchange for all other Premium Products.
Specifically, the Exchange is proposing to adopt an execution fee and a
comparison fee for all transactions in options on RSP and IGW.\8\ The
amount of the execution fee and comparison fee for products covered by
this filing shall be $0.15 and $0.03 per contract, respectively, for
all Public Customer Orders \9\ and Firm Proprietary orders. The amount
of the execution fee and comparison fee for all ISE Market Maker
transactions shall be equal to the execution fee and comparison fee
currently charged by the Exchange for ISE Market Maker transactions in
equity options.\10\ Finally, the amount of the execution fee and
comparison fee for all non-ISE Market Maker transactions shall be $0.16
and $0.03 per contract, respectively. Further, since options on RSP and
IGW are multiply-listed, the Payment for Order Flow fee shall also
apply. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change will further the
Exchange's goal of introducing new products to the marketplace that are
competitively priced.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The Exchange represents that these fees will be charged only
to Exchange members. Under a pilot program that is set to expire on
July 31, 2007, these fees will also be charged to Linkage Orders (as
defined in ISE Rule 1900). See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
54204 (July 25, 2006), 71 FR 43548 (August 1, 2006) (SR-ISE-2006-
38).
    \9\ ``Public Customer Order'' is defined in ISE Rule 100(a)(39)
as an order for the account of a Public Customer. ``Public
Customer'' is defined in ISE Rule 100(a)(38) as a person that is not
a broker or dealer in securities.
    \10\ The execution fee is currently between $.21 and $.12 per
contract side, depending on the Exchange Average Daily Volume, and
the comparison fee is currently $.03 per contract side.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, the Exchange proposes to remove IWF, IWP, IWS and IWV from
its Schedule of Fees because the Exchange recently delisted these four
Premium Products, and they no longer trade on the Exchange.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Certain clarifying language changes were made to the
original filing. Telephone call between Samir Patel, Assistant
General Counsel, ISE and Richard Holley, Special Counsel, Division
of Market Regulation, Commission, on May 25, 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange notes that the symbol for EENC has changed to
ENT,\12\ and the Schedule of Fees has been updated to reflect that
change.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ On February 9, 2007, Enterra Energy Trust, whose options
are currently traded on the Exchange, changed its ticker symbol from
EENC to ENT.
    \13\ See supra note 11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\14\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\15\ in particular, in that
it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among its members and other persons using
its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that

is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \16\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \17\ thereunder. At
any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \17\ 17 CFR 19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File No. SR-ISE-2007-31 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2007-31. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the ISE. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-ISE-2007-31 and should be submitted on or before June
27, 2007.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-10874 Filed 6-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 46790]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18949]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL14-87-000]

Sierra Green Energy, LLC v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company;
Notice of Complaint

    Take notice that on August 4, 2014, pursuant to Rule 218 of the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.218, Sierra Green Energy, LLC (SGE or
Complainant), filed a formal complaint against Pacific Gas and Electric
Company (PG&E or Respondent), alleging that the Respondent breached
certain legal and contractual obligations as set forth in the Power
Purchase Agreement and Small Generator Interconnection Agreement, as
more fully explained in the complaint.
    The Complainant states that a copy of the complaint has been served
on the Respondent.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on August 25, 2014.

    Dated: August 5, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-18949 Filed 8-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


From:
David Ailor<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent:
Wednesday, November 18, 2015 7:42 AM
To:
'Jones, DonnaLee'<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc:
Raymond, Gabrielle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:
RE: Draft Action items, changes to ICR, under discussion - please review by COB Tuesday

Noted - thanks.  I've already circulated Enclosure 1.  DCA

David C. Ailor, P.E.
President
American Coke and Coal Chemicals Institute
25 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20001
Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>
eFax.:<PHONE_NUMBER>
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>www.accci.org

-----Original Message-----
From: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 7:05 AM
To: David Ailor<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc: GABRIELLE RAYMOND<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: RE: Draft Action items, changes to ICR, under discussion - please review by COB Tuesday

Thanks! We will add these changes to the minutes.
On the other items I sent, I forgot to add a couple questions about the facility estimate of pushing capture and methodology to enclosure 1. I can do that later today so hold off on sending out enclosure 1 redline version.
If you already sent it, that's fine, I can just send an insert then. I will do both if I don't hear from you.

Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02) Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

________________________________________
From: David Ailor<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 7:55 PM
To: Jones, DonnaLee
Cc: 'GABRIELLE RAYMOND'; Allen Dittenhoefer; Bill Osborn; Bryan Kresak; Charles Jones; Chris Hardin<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Chung, David; Coleen Davis; Dan Belack; Dave Hacker; David Ailor; David Fanning<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Ed Dinsmore<EMAIL_ADDRESS>James Hosfield; Janis Deitch; Jay Cornelius; Joe Hanning; John Hill; Jonelle Scheetz; Julianne Kurdila; Katie Kistler; Keith Nagel; Krista Armentrout; Marian Gammon; Mark Poling; May, Jeffrey X; Mike Dzurinko; Nicole Siviy; Parker Adams; Patrick Smith; Peter Libell; Randy Wiler; Rich Zavoda; Scott Kiechle; Solomon Nyathi; Tishie Woodwell; Traci Self; Victoria Morton<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: RE: Draft Action items, changes to ICR, under discussion - please review by COB Tuesday

Donna Lee:  The COETF's suggested revisions to the draft you sent earlier today are highlighted in yellow below; all of our suggestions appear in "Under Discussion."  I'm cc'ing the COETF on my response to you, towards the member companies correcting anything I have misstated or omitted.  Thanks, DCA

Under discussion
--Number of runs and/or length of time for tests at quench tower --Whether Facilities will be required to perform Enclosure 2 stack testing, per extended coking considerations --Schedule
--Safety concerns related to the testing of quench towers
--Concerns related to schedule, cost, safety, and non-standard testing (not being able to meet EPA Method 1 upstream and downstream at quench towers)
--Reduction of all testing to the historical 3 runs

David C. Ailor, P.E.
President
American Coke and Coal Chemicals Institute
25 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20001
Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>
eFax.:<PHONE_NUMBER>
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>www.accci.org

-----Original Message-----
From: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 9:19 AM
To: David Ailor<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc: GABRIELLE RAYMOND<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: Draft Action items, changes to ICR, under discussion - please review by COB Tuesday

David - My Draft - please comment on omissions or corrections by COB Tuesday Thanks

Action Items

--By-product industry send CBI info to EPA CBI office on extended coking (EPA will supply format Tuesday) --Industry will submit any previous test data that would help EPA figure out how many test runs and sample volume to require (e.g., USS Quench tower data); will send by CD or zip (and rename as
filename.abc) --Redline of Enclosure 1 and 2 by industry --Tech Memo on reference detection limits from Steff via Donna (done) --Attendee list
(done)

Changes to ICR

--pushing tests only 3 runs

--no ambient testing within fenceline

--Ambient testing at fenceline for two weeks --Eliminate flow measurement during pushing (facilities will add information to enclosure 1 on their estimate for pushing capture and reasoning for estimate) --All Quench tower tests will be above baffles both PM and organic. Industry will try to get as close to isokinetic as they can but report the percent isokinetic during test regardless of whether iso or not.

Under discussion

--Number of runs and/or length of time for tests at quench tower --Whether Facilities will be required to perform Enclosure 2 stack testing, per extended coking considerations --Schedule


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 122 (Friday, June 24, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 41219]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14900]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2016-0388]

Eighth Coast Guard District Annual Safety Zones; Wheeling
Heritage Port Festival; Ohio River Mile 90.2 to 90.7; Wheeling, WV

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce a safety zone for the Wheeling
Heritage Port Festival Fireworks on the Ohio River, in Wheeling, WV
from mile 90.2 to 90.7, extending the entire width of the river on
September 17, 2016. This zone is needed to protect vessels transiting
the area and event spectators from the hazards associated with a barge-
based fireworks display. During the enforcement period, entry into,
transiting, or anchoring in the safety zone is prohibited to all
vessels not registered with the sponsor as participants or official
patrol vessels, unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the
Port (COTP) Pittsburgh or a designated representative.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.801 Table 1, Sector Ohio Valley,
No. 60, will be enforced from 10 p.m. until 11:30 p.m., on September
17, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notice of enforcement, call or email MST1 Jennifer Haggins, Marine
Safety Unit Pittsburgh, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the Safety Zone
for the annual Wheeling Heritage Port Sternwheel Festival Fireworks
listed in 33 CFR 165.801 Table 1, Sector Ohio Valley, No. 60, from 10
p.m. to 11:30 p.m. on September 17, 2016. This safety zone extends from
mile 90.2 to 90.7 on the Ohio River in Wheeling, WV. This action is
being taken to provide for the safety of life on navigable waterways
during the fireworks display. Entry into the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the COTP or a designated representative. Persons
or vessels desiring to enter into or passage through the safety zone
must request permission from the COTP or a designated representative.
If permission is granted, all persons and vessels shall comply with the
instructions of the COTP or designated representative.
    This notice of enforcement is issued under authority of 33 CFR
165.801 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this notice of enforcement
in the Federal Register, the Coast Guard will provide the maritime
community with advance notification of this enforcement period via
Local Notice to Mariners and updates via Marine Information Broadcasts.

L. Mcclain, Jr.,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Pittsburgh.
[FR Doc. 2016-14900 Filed 6-23-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OMB CONTROL NO. 2050-0077
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	" APPLICATION FOR REIMBURSEMENT TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR EMERGENCY RESPOSE TO HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE RELEASES UNDER CERCLA SECTION 123"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHORT CHARACTERIZATION OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      The Agency requires applicants for reimbursement under this program authorized under Section 123 of CERCLA to submit an application that demonstrates consistency with program eligibility requirements.  This is necessary to ensure proper use of the Superfund.  EPA reviews the information to ensure compliance with all statutory and program requirements.  The applicants are local governments who have incurred expenses, above and beyond their budgets, for hazardous substance response.  Submission of this information is voluntary and to the applicant's benefit.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
information.

      Section 123 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to promulgate rules by which any general purpose unit of local government may apply to EPA for reimbursement for costs incurred in carrying out temporary emergency measures necessary to prevent or mitigate injury to human health or the environment associated with the release or threatened release of any hazardous substance or pollutant or contaminant. The Statute limits the maximum award for a single response to $25,000. The Local Governments Reimbursement (LGR) Program is a voluntary program aimed at alleviating burden incurred by general purpose units of local government from carrying out temporary emergency measures in response to the release of hazardous substances.

      The Agency requires applicants for reimbursement to submit an application package that demonstrates consistency with program eligibility criteria and certifies compliance with the reimbursement requirements. This information collection is necessary to ensure proper use and appropriate distribution of reimbursement awards among applicants. EPA will receive and closely evaluate reimbursement requests in accordance with the promulgated final rule (63 FR 8283; Vol. 63 No. 32) to ensure that the most deserving cases receive awards.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
current collection.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Applicants must complete and submit to EPA an application package supplied by the Agency. The application package confirms that the costs were incurred for temporary emergency measures necessary to protect human health and the environment. The application submitted by the local government or agency requesting reimbursement is reviewed by EPA to ensure compliance with all statutory and program requirements.

      EPA uses a standard application form because it reduces confusion about what information is to be supplied, helps ensure that all applicants are evaluated on the basis of comparable information, and enables reviewers to check applications for completeness and consistency quickly. The form requests five basic pieces of information: (1) identification of the local government requesting reimbursement; (2) information about the incident; (3) information about the response, including the specific temporary emergency measures for which reimbursement is being sought; (4) cost data; and (5) certifications and signature of the highest ranking official or authorized representative of the local government. Detailed instructions for completing the form and examples are included in the application package provided by EPA to potential requesters.

      Section 1 of the application identifies the general-purpose unit seeking reimbursement and the means of contacting the applicant. This information is necessary to facilitate the exchange of information between the applicant and the Agency.

      Section 2 of the application describes the incident, specifically including information on the date and time of occurrence or discovery; location of the incident; source or cause of the release; identity of the hazardous substances released; and the associated threats to human health and the environment. Space is also provided for additional information pertinent to the incident.  EPA requires detailed information on the nature of the incident to ensure that hazardous substances covered under CERCLA were involved and warranted temporary emergency measures.

      Section 3 of the application describes the response -- specifically information on the date and time of response initiation; date of response completion; response participants; response activities; and the temporary emergency measures for which reimbursement is sought. Space is also provided for additional information pertinent to the response. Information in this section is crucial for EPA's determination of whether the response was appropriate and necessary to prevent or mitigate injury to human health or the environment. The information in this section will confirm whether the response was not inconsistent with CERCLA and The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) and meets the eligibility criteria for reimbursement established by 40 CFR 310.

      Section 4 of the application contains information on the costs which were directly related to the response effort and for which reimbursement is being sought. In addition to the total reimbursement amount requested, a cost breakdown is provided. This section also requires inclusion of all supporting documentation (e.g., invoices, sales receipts, rental agreements). Cost information is necessary to determine the amount of the potential reimbursement. A cost breakdown allows the Agency to determine which costs are eligible for reimbursement.

      The regulation requires that applicants certify that they first sought reimbursement from other sources before seeking reimbursement through the Local Governments Reimbursement Program. Section 4 of the application also requests applicants to certify their attempts to recover costs from other sources, including responsible parties, local government insurance funds, or the state.

      The information contained in the application is the minimum required by EPA to make prudent reimbursement decisions. It demonstrates that the reimbursement being requested is consistent with the statutory requirements of §123 of CERCLA and the regulatory requirements of the NCP.

      Applicants receiving reimbursement from the Superfund are required to maintain all cost documentation and any other records relating to the reimbursement request, and to provide EPA with access to such records.  If, after three years from the date of reimbursement, EPA has not initiated a cost recovery action, the applicant may dispose of the records. The applicant, however, must notify EPA and allow EPA the opportunity to take possession of the records before they are destroyed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
above.
      	During development of the Local Governments Reimbursement rule, EPA conducted research into other EPA programs and federal agency programs to determine if the information required for the Local Governments Reimbursement Program was already being collected elsewhere.

      Within EPA, the following programs were investigated: the Asbestos in Schools Hazard Abatement Program; Pesticides Indemnification Program; Municipal Water Treatment Works Construction Grants Program.

      Other federal agencies investigated include: Federal Emergency Management Agency; Department of Transportation (State Highway Aid Program); Department of Agriculture (Casual Firefighter Program); Department of Education (Impact Aid/Disaster Aid Program); Department of State (Protection of Foreign Missions and Officials Program); Department of Health and Human Services; Department of Housing and Urban Development.

      The New York State Spill Fund, New Jersey State Spill Fund, and the California Emergency Response Fund also were researched. Pursuant to this research, EPA concluded that the information required of reimbursement applicants is specific and unique to the reimbursement program and is not duplicated by any other federal agency/department or EPA program office.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
methods used to minimize burden.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      The Local Governments Reimbursement (LGR) Program does not directly involve, or produce burden for, small businesses.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
reducing burden.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      The reimbursement application process involves only one collection of information.  Therefore, it would not be feasible to collect information less frequently.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
conducted in a manner:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records, for more than three years;
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      In general, the information collection requirements covered by this ICR adhere to the guidelines stated in the 1995 Paperwork Reduction Act as amended, OMB's implementing regulations, EPA's Information Collection Review Handbook, and other applicable OMB guidance. This ICR does not exceed any of the OMB guidelines found 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
reported.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years - even if the collection of
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	The Federal Register Notice required under 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on this collection of information was published in the Federal Register (86 FR 212) on November 5, 2021, and the comment period closed on January 4, 2022.  No comments were received.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Under 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), OMB requires agencies to consult with potential ICR respondents and data users about specific aspects of ICRs before submitting an original or renewal ICR to OMB for review and approval. EPA did not pursue consultations with interested parties during the development of the renewal of this collection due to the fact that those that may have interest in the future cannot be identified since the qualifying incidents have not yet occurred
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
of contractors or grantees.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      No payments or gifts are used in association with the collection activities for this program.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy. If the collection requires a systems of
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
records notice (SORN) or privacy impact assessment (PIA), those should be cited and
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
described here.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      The local government reimbursement regulation does not require any confidential information.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
consent.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      The local governments reimbursement regulation does not request any information of a sensitive nature.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included under `Annual Cost to Federal Government'.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Requests for reimbursement consist of a completed application form and supporting documentation that verifies costs incurred in a particular response and are eligible for reimbursement. The actual preparation of the application package and the filing and maintaining of records are the only sources of burden on applicants seeking reimbursement.

      EPA conducted a test of the application form and instructions with eight Agency and contractor staff and recorded the time required to perform each step involved in preparing an application. Testers read the preamble and reimbursement rule, a fact sheet on a fictitious response, supporting documentation (such as sales receipts, rental agreements, etc.) and completed the actual form requesting reimbursement for the fictitious response. Estimated response times for each task are noted below in Table 1.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                    Table 1

             Estimated Burden on Applicants Seeking Reimbursement
                       for Temporary Emergency Measures
                              Under §123 of SARA
______________________________________________________________________________
Burden Item							Average Hours per Application

Read Instructions[a]									1
Gather Information[b]									2
Compile Information[c]									3
Complete Application[d]								1
File and Maintain Information[e]	   					      ___.5___

Total Estimated Burden Hours Per Application					8.5
Total Estimated Number of Applications Submitted by
All Applicants per Year							     x_20[f]__

Total Estimated Annual Burden Hours					       170

Total Estimated Cost Burden to Responders[g] 				$  4,392.80

 Time to read or hear instructions. This includes the time which will be needed by applicants to familiarize themselves with the requirements for requesting reimbursement and the instructions for completing the application form.
 Time to gather information. This includes the time necessary to collect various reports from files and extract pertinent information and find additional reference materials and information.
 Time to compile information. This includes the time necessary to assemble information specific to the response for which reimbursement is being sought. This may include interviewing first responders and ascertaining the number of work hours involved in the response.
 Time to complete application. This includes the time required to enter the pertinent information on the application form in accordance with the line-by-line instructions.
 Time to file and maintain information. This includes the time needed for preparing file folders, indexes, and filing.
 Approximately 20 applications are received each year.

Estimated hourly rate is $ 25.84. This estimate takes into consideration that the application may be prepared by a secretary or other administrative staff, fire chief, police officer, county clerk, or health professional. The estimated hourly rate is taken from the Bureau of Labor Statistics average salaries (May 2020) for "Protective Service Occupation" and "Office and Administrative Support Occupation."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

13. Provide an estimate for the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers
resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden
already reflected on the burden worksheet).
 The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life) and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling, and testing equipment; and record storage facilities.
 If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of purchasing or contracting out information collections services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.
 Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government, or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      See Table 1.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14. Provide estimates of annualized costs to the Federal government. Also, provide a description
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agencies may also aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                    Table 2
                           Estimate of Agency Costs

 Cost Per FTE						FTE			     $

      Personnel compensation and benefits[a]		.3			29, 091.00
      Overhead (15% of FTE)[b]				   			14,545.50
      Total							.3		            43,636.50
             Source: FY 2018 Budget data (EPA Office of Emergency Response Management), average PC&B Cost per FTE in HQ.
             Includes travel, rent, contract services (maintenance), and supplies and materials.

 Cost for 0.3 FTE = $96,970 x .3 = $29,091.00
 Calculated annual hours per federal FTE: 2088
 0.3 FTE = 626.4 hrs. per year
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported on the burden worksheet (in hour or cost burden.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

	The change in burden to applicants takes into account that electronic filing of applications and e-signature will shave .5 hours off of the overall burden per applicant. Furthermore, it is anticipated that the Agency will receive fewer applications, thus changing the burden overall.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.

	No collection of information will be published.

17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.

      Not seeking to not display the expiration date

18.Explain each exception to the topics of the certification statement identified in "Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions."

	No exception to the topics of the certification statement


[Federal Register: January 14, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 9)]
[Notices]
[Page 2129]
[DOCID:fr14ja10-43]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13625-000]

Lock+TM Hydro Friends Fund XXX, LLC; Notice of
Preliminary Permit Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting
Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Competing Applications

January 6, 2010.
    On November 13, 2009, Lock+TM Hydro Friends Fund XXX,
LLC filed an application, pursuant to Section 4(f) of the Federal Power
Act, proposing to study the feasibility of Project Green Dream (Project
No. 13625), to be located at the New Cumberland Locks and Dam on the
Ohio River, in Hancock County, West Virginia. The New Cumberland Locks
and Dam are owned and operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
    Project Green Dream would include new facilities adjacent to the
eastern end of the New Cumberland Locks and Dam. The proposed project
would consist of: (1) One new approximately 450-foot-long, 220-foot-
wide conduit; (2) two new approximately 109-foot-wide, 40-foot-tall
lock frame modules, containing nine turbines each, with a total
installed capacity of 36 megawatts; (3) new flow control doors; (4) a
new tailrace; (5) a new switchyard, transformer, and control room; (6)
a new approximately 1,000-foot-long, 36.7-kilovolt transmission line
from the turbines to the new switchyard, and a new approximately 2,000-
foot-long, 69-kilovolt transmission line from the new switchyard to an
existing distribution line; (7) and appurtenant facilities. The project
would have an estimated annual generation of 284,018 megawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Wayne F. Krouse, Lock+TM Hydro
Friends Fund XXX, LLC, 5090 Richmond Avenue 390, Houston, TX
77056,<PHONE_NUMBER> (ext. 709).
    FERC Contact: Brandon Cherry,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing application: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``eFiling'' link. If unable to be filed electronically,
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-
comments.asp.
    More information about this project can be viewed or printed on the
``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-
filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-13625) in the docket
number field to access the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-
866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-526 Filed 1-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 116 (Monday, June 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27805-27806]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12670]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM98-1-000]

Records Governing Off-the-Record Communications

Public Notice

    This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of
the receipt of prohibited and exempt off-the-record communications.
    Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission
decisional employees, who make or receive a prohibited or exempt off-
the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested
proceeding, to deliver to the Secretary of the Commission, a copy of
the communication, if written, or a summary of the substance of any
oral communication.
    Prohibited communications are included in a public, non-decisional
file associated with, but not a part of, the decisional record of the
proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited
communication and any responses thereto should become a part of the
decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or
contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record

communication, and may request that the Commission place the prohibited
communication and responses thereto in the decisional record. The
Commission will grant such a request only when it determines that
fairness so requires. Any person identified below as having made a
prohibited off-the-record communication shall serve the document on all
parties listed on the official service list for the applicable
proceeding in accordance with Rule 2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
    Exempt off-the-record communications are included in the decisional
record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e) (1) (v).
    The following is a list of off-the-record communications recently
received by the Secretary of the Commission. The communications listed
are grouped by docket numbers in ascending order. These filings are
available for electronic review at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number,
excluding the last three digits, in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Presenter or
            Docket No.                 File date          requester
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prohibited:
    1. CP15-558-000...............       5-19-2017  Medical Society of
                                                     New Jersey.
    2. CP15-93-000................        6-2-2017  John H. Klein.
    3. CP15-554-000...............        6-8-2017  Anne S. Bryan.
Exempt:
    1. P-1256-031.................        6-1-2017  U.S. House
                                                     Representative
                                                     Adrian Smith.
    2. CP17-40-000................        6-2-2017  FERC Staff.\1\
    3. CP17-40-000................        6-2-2017  FERC Staff.\2\
    4. CP15-554-001...............        6-8-2017  U.S. House
                                                     Representative Bob
                                                     Goodlatte.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Telephone Conversation Memo dated April 26, 2017 reporting
  teleconference with Federal and State Representatives.
\2\ Telephone Conversation Memo dated May 25, 2017 reporting
  teleconference with Federal and State Representatives.

    Dated: June 13, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-12670 Filed 6-16-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 17, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 202)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 61752-61753]
[DOCID:fr17oc08-21]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2008-1018; Airspace Docket No. 08-AAL-31]

Proposed Revocation of Class E Airspace; Metlakatla, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to revoke the Class E airspace at
Metlakatla, AK. The privately funded Special instrument approaches
serving Metlakatla, AK have been removed. There is no longer a
requirement for the controlled airspace. Adoption of this proposal
would result in revoking the Class E airspace upward from 700 feet
(ft.) above the surface at the Metlakatla Airport, Metlakatla, AK.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 1, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the proposal to the Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-
0001. You must identify the docket number FAA-2008-1018/Airspace Docket
No. 08-AAL-31, at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit
comments on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review
the public docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and
any final disposition in person in the Dockets Office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket
Office (telephone 1-800-647-5527) is on the plaza level of the
Department of Transportation NASSIF Building at the above address.
    An informal docket may also be examined during normal business
hours at the office of the Manager, Safety, Alaska Flight Service
Operations, Federal Aviation Administration, 222 West 7th Avenue, Box
14, Anchorage, AK 99513-7587.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Rolf, Federal Aviation
Administration, 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, Anchorage, AK 99513-7587;
telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet address: http://www.alaska.faa.gov/at.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2008-1018/
Airspace Docket No. 08-AAL-31.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of Notice of Proposed Rulemakings (NPRMs)

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://
www.faa.gov or the Superintendent of Document's Web page at http://
www.access.gpo.gov/nara/index.html.
    Additionally, any person may obtain a copy of this notice by
submitting a request to the Federal Aviation Administration, Office of
Air Traffic Airspace Management, ATA-400, 800 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591 or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. Communications must
identify both docket numbers for this notice. Persons interested in
being placed on a mailing list for future NPRMs should contact the
FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>, to request a copy of
Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Distribution
System, which describes the application procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is considering an amendment to the Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR part 71), which would revoke the Class E airspace
at the Metlakatla Airport, in Metlakatla, AK. The intended effect of
this proposal is to revoke Class E airspace due to the removal of the
instrument approaches at the Metlakatla Airport, Metlakatla, AK.
    Class E controlled airspace extending upward from 700 ft. and 1,200
ft. above the surface in the Metlakatla Airport area would be revoked
by this action.
    This action would result in the removal of Class E airspace
depicted on affected aeronautical charts. The coordinates for this
airspace docket are based on North American Datum 83. The Class E
airspace areas designated as 700/1200 foot transition areas are
published in paragraph 6005 in FAA Order 7400.9R, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, signed August 15, 2007, and effective September
15, 2007, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class
E airspace designations listed in this document would be subsequently
removed from the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal.

Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart 1, Section 40103, Sovereignty and use of
airspace. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing
regulations to ensure the safe and efficient use of the navigable
airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because
it proposes to remove Class E airspace at the Metlakatla Airport, AK,
and represents the FAA's continuing effort to safely and efficiently
use the navigable airspace.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9R, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, signed August 15, 2007, and effective September 15,
2007, is to be amended as follows:

* * * * *

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Extending Upward From 700 Feet or
More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AAL AK E5 Metlakatla, AK [Revoked]

* * * * *

    Issued in Anchorage, AK, on October 6, 2008.
Anthony M. Wylie,
Manager, Alaska Flight Services Information Area Group.
 [FR Doc. E8-24689 Filed 10-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P