[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 162 (Monday, August 22, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 56744]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20001]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Release From Federal Surplus Property and Grant
Assurance Obligations at Redding Municipal Airport (RDD), Redding,
California

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of request to release airport land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes to rule and
invites public comment on the application for a release of
approximately 1.10 acres of airport property at the Redding Municipal
Airport (RDD), Redding, California from all conditions contained in the
Surplus Property Deed and Grant Assurances because the parcel of land
is not needed for airport purposes. The land requested to be released
is separated from the airport by Airport Road and located outside the
airport fence at the southwest corner of the airport property. The
release will allow the City of Redding to sell the property at its fair
market value, thereby benefiting the Airport and serving the interest
of civil aviation. The proposed use will be compatible with the airport
and will not interfere with the airport or its operation.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 21, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Comments on the request may be mailed
to the FAA at the following address: James W. Lomen, Manager, Federal
Aviation Administration, San Francisco Airports District Office,
Federal Register Comment, 1000 Marina Boulevard, Suite 220, Brisbane,
CA 94005. In addition, one copy of the comment submitted to the FAA
must be mailed to Mr. Rod Dinger, Airport Director, Redding Municipal
Airport, 6751 Woodrum Circle, Suite 200, Redding, CA 96002.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the Wendell H. Ford
Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21),
Public Law 106-181 (Apr. 5, 2000; 114 Stat. 61), this notice must be
published in the Federal Register 30 days before the Secretary may
waive any condition imposed on a federally obligated airport by surplus
property conveyance deeds or grant agreements.
    The following is a brief overview of the request:
    The City of Redding, California requested a release from Federal
surplus property and grant assurance obligations for approximately 1.10
acres of airport land to allow for its sale. The property was
originally acquired pursuant to the Surplus Property Act of 1944 and
was deeded to the City of Redding on June 6, 1949. The parcel of land
is located on the southwest side of the airport along Meadow View Drive
and Airport Road. The property is separated from the airfield by
Airport Road and the airport perimeter fence.
    The parcel of land is undeveloped, has no structural improvements,
and has not been used for aviation purposes for over 20 years. The City
of Redding will sell the 1.10 acres of property at fair market value
and redeveloped for commercial business purposes.
    The sales proceeds will be devoted to airport operations and
capital projects. The reuse of the property will not interfere with the
airport or its operation and will thereby serve the interests of civil
aviation.

    Issued in Brisbane, California, on August 10, 2016.
James W. Lomen,
Manager, San Francisco Airports District Office, Western-Pacific
Region.
[FR Doc. 2016-20001 Filed 8-19-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


28004 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 2003 / Notices independent advice and counsel to EPA on policy issues associated with implementation of the Clean Air Act of 1990. The Committee advises on economic, environmental, technical scientific, and enforcement policy issues. Open Meeting Notice: Pursuant to 5 U. S. C. App. 2 section 10( a)( 2), notice is hereby given that the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee will hold its next open meeting on Thursday, June 12, 2003, from approximately 8: 30 a. m. to 2: 30 p. m. at the Sheraton Crystal City Hotel, 1880 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia. Seating will be available on a first come, first served basis. Three of the CAAC's Subcommittees ( the Linking Energy, Land Use, Transportation, and Air Quality Concerns Subcommittee; the Permits/ NSR/ Toxics Subcommittee; and the Economics Incentives and Regulatory Innovations Subcommittee) will hold meetings on Wednesday, June 11, 2003 from approximately 1 p. m. to 7 p. m. at the Sheraton Crystal City Hotel, the same location as the full Committee. The schedule for the three Subcommittees meetings is: Linking Energy, Land Use, Transportation, and Air Quality   1 p. m. to 3 p. m.; Permits/ NSR/ Toxics   3 p. m. to 5 p. m.; and Economics Incentives and Regulatory Innovations   5 p. m. to 7 p. m. Inspection of Committee Documents: The Committee agenda and any documents prepared for the meeting will be publicly available at the meeting. Thereafter, these documents, together with CAAC meeting minutes, will be available by contacting the Office of Air and Radiation Docket and requesting information under docket item A   94   34 ( CAAAC). The Docket office can be reached by telephoning 202   260   7548; FAX 202   260   4400.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information concerning this meeting of the full CAAAC, please contact Paul Rasmussen, Office of Air and Radiation, U. S. EPA ( 202) 564   1306, FAX ( 202) 564   1352 or by mail at U. S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation ( Mail code 6102 A), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20004. For information on the Subcommittee meetings, please contact the following individuals: ( 1) Linking Transportation, Land Use and Air Quality Concerns   Robert Larson, 734   214   4277; Debbie Stackhouse, 919   541   4354; and ( 2) Economic Incentives and Regulatory Innovations   Paul Rasmussen, 202   564   1306. Additional information on these meetings and the CAAAC and its Subcommittees can be found on the CAAAC Web site: http:// www. epa. gov/ oar/ caaac/.

Dated: May 13, 2002. Robert D. Brenner, Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation. [ FR Doc. 03   12866 Filed 5   21   03; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   M ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ OPPT   2003   0023; FRL   7309   1]

Approval of Test Marketing Exemption for a Certain New Chemical AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA's approval of an application for test marketing exemption ( TME) under section 5( h)( 1) of the Toxic Substances Control Act ( TSCA) and 40 CFR 720.38. EPA has designated this application as TME   03   0001. The test marketing conditions are described in the TME application and in this notice. DATES: Approval of this TME is effective May 9, 2003. Comments, identified by docket ID number OPPT   2003   0023 and the TME number, must be received on or before June 6, 2003. ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/ courier. Follow the detailed instructions as provided in Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information contact: Barbara Cunningham, Director, Environmental Assistance Division ( 7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460   0001; telephone number: ( 202) 554   1404; e mail address: TSCAHotline epa. gov. For technical information contact: Miriam Wiggins Lewis, Chemical Control Division, ( 7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460   0001; telephone number: ( 202) 564   9373; e mail address: Wigginslewis. Miriam@ epa. gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

This action is directed in particular to the chemical manufacturer and/ or importer who submitted the TME to EPA. This action may, however, be of interest to the public in general. Since other entities may also be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information? 1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this action under docket identification ( ID) number OPPT   2003   0023. The official public docket consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received, and other information related to this action. Although a part of the official docket, the public docket does not include Confidential Business Information ( CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official public docket is the collection of materials that is available for public viewing at the EPA Docket Center, Rm. B102 Reading Room, EPA West, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center is open from 8: 30 a. m. to 4: 30 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The EPA Docket Center Reading Room telephone number is ( 202) 566   1744 and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket, which is located in EPA Docket Center, is ( 202) 566   0280. 2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the `` Federal Register'' listings at http:// www. epa. gov/ fedrgstr/. An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA Dockets at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket/ to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I. B. 1. Once in the system, select `` search,'' then key in the appropriate docket ID number. Certain types of information will not be placed in the EPA Dockets. Information claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute, which is not included in the official public docket, will not be available for public viewing VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 15: 22 May 21, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 22MYN1. SGM 22MYN1 OPPT 2003 0023 0001 RECEIVED OPPT NCIC 2003 MAY 22 7: 39 AM 28005 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 2003 / Notices in EPA's electronic public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material will not be placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in printed, paper form in the official public docket. To the extent feasible, publicly available docket materials will be made available in EPA's electronic public docket. When a document is selected from the index list in EPA Dockets, the system will identify whether the document is available for viewing in EPA's electronic public docket. Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I. B. 1. EPA intends to work towards providing electronic access to all of the publicly available docket materials through EPA's electronic public docket. For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in the version of the comment that is placed in EPA's electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket. Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be transferred to EPA's electronic public docket. Public comments that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be scanned and placed in EPA's electronic public docket. Where practical, physical objects will be photographed, and the photograph will be placed in EPA's electronic public docket along with a brief description written by the docket staff.

C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments? The notice of receipt was published late in the 45   day review period; however, an opportunity to submit comments is being offered at this time. You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/ courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the appropriate docket ID number and the TME number in the subject line on the first page of your comment. Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked `` late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late comments. If you wish to submit CBI or information that is otherwise protected by statute, please follow the instructions in Unit I. D. Do not use EPA Dockets or e mail to submit CBI or information protected by statute. 1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as prescribed in this unit, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other contact information in the body of your comment. Also include this contact information on the outside of any disk or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying the disk or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further information on the substance of your comment. EPA's policy is that EPA will not edit your comment, and any identifying or contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA's electronic public docket to submit comments to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket, and follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once in the system, select `` search,'' and then key in docket ID number OPPT   2003   0023. The system is an `` anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity, e mail address, or other contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. ii. E mail. Comments may be sent by e mail to oppt. ncic@ epa. gov, Attention: Docket ID Number OPPT   2003   0023 and the TME number. In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's email system is not an `` anonymous access'' system. If you send an e mail comment directly to the docket without going through EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e mail system automatically captures your e mail address. E mail addresses that are automatically captured by EPA's e mail system are included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM that you mail to the mailing address identified in Unit I. C. 2. These electronic submissions will be accepted in WordPerfect or ASCII file format. Avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption. 2. By mail. Send your comments to: Document Control Office ( 7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics ( OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460   0001. 3. By hand delivery or courier. Deliver your comments to: OPPT Document Control Office ( DCO) in EPA East Building Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. Attention: Docket ID Number OPPT   2003   0023 and the TME number. The DCO is open from 8 a. m. to 4 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the DCO is ( 202) 564   8930.

D. How Should I Submit CBI To the Agency?

Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI electronically through EPA's electronic public docket or by e mail. You may claim information that you submit to EPA as CBI by marking any part or all of that information as CBI ( if you submit CBI on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that is CBI). Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes any information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket and EPA's electronic public docket. If you submit the copy that does not contain CBI on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM clearly that it does not contain CBI. Information not marked as CBI will be included in the public docket and EPA's electronic public docket without prior notice. If you have any questions about CBI or the procedures for claiming CBI, please consult the technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 16: 40 May 21, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 22MYN1. SGM 22MYN1 28006 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 2003 / Notices E. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your comments: 1. Explain your views as clearly as possible. 2. Describe any assumptions that you used. 3. Provide copies of any technical information and/ or data you used that support your views. 4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you arrived at the estimate that you provide. 5. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns. 6. Offer alternative ways to improve the notice or collection activity. 7. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline in this document. 8. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket ID number assigned to this action and the TME number in the subject line on the first page of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal Register citation.

II. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?

Section 5( h)( 1) of TSCA and 40 CFR 720.38 authorizes EPA to exempt persons from premanufacture notification ( PMN) requirements and permit them to manufacture or import new chemical substances for test marketing purposes, if the Agency finds that the manufacture, processing, distribution in commerce, use, and disposal of the substances for test marketing purposes will not present an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment. EPA may impose restrictions on test marketing activities and may modify or revoke a test marketing exemption upon receipt of new information which casts significant doubt on its finding that the test marketing activity will not present an unreasonable risk of injury.

III. What Action is the Agency Taking?

EPA has approved the abovereferenced TME. EPA has determined that test marketing the new chemical substance, under the conditions set out in the TME application and in this notice, will not present any unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment.

IV. What Restrictions Apply to this TME?

The test market time period, production volume, number of customers, and use must not exceed specifications in the application and this notice. All other conditions and restrictions described in the application and in this notice must also be met.

TME   03   0001. Date of Receipt: March 17, 2003. Notice of Receipt: April 21, 2003 ( 68 FR 19532). Applicant: PPG Industries, Inc. Chemical: Modified Polyol. Use: Component of coating with open use. Production Volume: 4,000 Kiligram/ year. Number of Customers: One. Test Marketing Period: 270 to 365 days, commencing on first day of commerical manufacture. The following additional restrictions apply to this TME. A bill of lading accompanying each shipment must state that the use of the substance is restricted to that approved in the TME. In addition, the applicant shall maintain the following records until 5 years after the date they are created, and shall make them available for inspection or copying in accordance with section 11 of TSCA: 1. Records of the quantity of the TME substance produced and the date of manufacture. 2. Records of dates of the shipments to each customer and the quantities supplied in each shipment. 3. Copies of the bill of lading that accompanies each shipment of the TME substance.

V. What was EPA's Risk Assessment for this TME?

EPA identified no significant health or environmental concerns for the test market substance. Therefore, the test market activities will not present any unreasonable risk of injury to human health or the environment.

VI. Can EPA Change Its Decision on this TME in the Future?

Yes. The Agency reserves the right to rescind approval or modify the conditions and restrictions of an exemption should any new information that comes to its attention cast significant doubt on its finding that the test marketing activities will not present any unreasonable risk of injury to human health or the environment.

List of Subjects Environmental protection, Test marketing exemptions. Dated: May 9, 2003. Miriam Wiggins Lewis, Acting Chief, New Chemicals Prenotice Management Branch, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. [ FR Doc. 03   12870 Filed 5   21   03; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   S FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION [ Notice 2003   11]

Filing Dates for the Texas Special Election in the 19th Congressional District AGENCY: Federal Election Commission. ACTION: Notice of filing dates for special election.

SUMMARY: Texas has scheduled a special runoff election on June 3, 2003, to fill the U. S. House of Representatives seat in the Nineteenth Congressional District vacated by Representative Larry Combest. On May 3, 2003, a Special General Election was held, with no candidate achieving a majority vote. Under Texas law, a Special Runoff Election will now be held with the two top vote getters participating. Committees participating in the Texas Special Runoff Election are required to file pre and post election reports.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Kevin R. Salley, Information Division, 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20463; Telephone: ( 202) 694   1100; Toll Free ( 800) 424   9530.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Principal Campaign Committees All principal campaign committees of candidates participating in the Texas Special Runoff Election shall file a 12 day Pre Runoff Report on May 22, 2003; and a 30 day Post Runoff Report on July 3, 2003. ( See chart below for the closing date for each report).

Unauthorized Committees ( PACs and Party Committees)

Political committees that file on a semiannual basis in 2003 are subject to special election reporting if they make previously undisclosed contributions or expenditures in connection with the Texas Special Runoff Election by the close of books for the applicable report( s). ( See chart below for the closing date for each report). Committees filing monthly that support candidates in the Texas Special Runoff Election should continue to file according to the monthly reporting schedule.

VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 15: 22 May 21, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 22MYN1. SGM 22MYN1


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 63 (Monday, April 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14100-14101]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06586]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Research, Engineering and Development Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the
Research, Engineering & Development Advisory Committee meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on April 11, 2018--9:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chinita A. Roundtree-Coleman at (609)
485-7149 or website at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is
hereby

given of a meeting of the Research, Engineering and Development (RE&D)
Advisory Committee. The meeting agenda will include receiving from the
Committee guidance for FAA's research and development investments in
the areas of air traffic services, airports, aircraft safety, human
factors and environment and energy. Attendance is open to the
interested public but seating is limited. With the approval of the
chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the
meeting. Persons wishing to attend the meeting, present statements, or
obtain information should contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may present a
written statement to the Committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 27, 2018.
Chinita A. Roundtree-Coleman,
Computer Specialist.
[FR Doc. 2018-06586 Filed 3-30-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 173 (Friday, September 6, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47023-47024]
[FR Doc No: 2019-19222]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-86844; File No. SR-Phlx-2019-31]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify the
Manner in Which It Calculates Volume, Liquidity and Quoting Thresholds
Applicable To Billing on the Exchange in Relation to a Systems Issue
Experienced by SIAC on August 12, 2019

August 30, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 28, 2019, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to modify the manner in which it calculates
volume, liquidity and quoting thresholds applicable to billing on the
Exchange in relation to a systems issue experienced by SIAC on August
12, 2019, which impacted trade and quote dissemination across all
markets.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at http://nasdaqphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to modify the manner in which it calculates
volume, liquidity and quoting thresholds applicable to billing on the
Exchange in relation to the August 12, 2019 systems issue, which
impacted trade and quote dissemination across all markets.\3\
Specifically, on August 12, 2019, SIAC \4\ determined to fail over to
back up servers after receiving indications that its primary systems
had become unstable, causing connectivity disruptions. The fail over to
secondary systems failed to cure the problem, resulting in market-wide
issues with the Consolidated Quote System and the Consolidated Tape
System, including gaps in the intra-day trades, quotes, and other
messages that were attempted to be sent to it. Consequently, the
accuracy of the transaction and quotation data for August 12, 2019 is
unknown.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See https://www.ctaplan.com/alerts#110000144324.
    \4\ SIAC is the operator of the Consolidated Quote System and
Consolidated Tape System, which disseminate real-time trade and
quote information in New York Stock Exchange LLC (Network A) and
Bats, NYSE Arca, NYSE American and other regional exchange (Network
B) listed securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a result, the Exchange is unable to accurately calculate member
transaction fees and credits, including calculations for the Exchange's
incentive programs, since several of the Exchange's transaction fees
and credits are based on trading, quoting and liquidity thresholds that
members must satisfy in order to qualify for the particular rates
(e.g., percentage of Consolidated Volume, Average Daily Volume, and
time at the NBBO). The Exchange therefore proposes to exclude August
12, 2019 from all tier calculations described in Equity 7 \5\ under the
heading Order Execution and Routing in order to reasonably ensure that
a member that would otherwise qualify for a particular threshold during
August 2019, and the corresponding transaction rate and/or incentive,
would not be negatively impacted by the August 12, 2019 systems issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Order Execution and Routing section under Equity 7
provides the schedule of fees and credits applicable to the PSX's
order execution and routing services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\6\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest. In this regard, because the accuracy of the transaction and
quotation data disseminated by SIAC for August 12, 2019 is unknown, the
Exchange believes that it is reasonable to exclude August 12, 2019 from
all tier calculations described in Equity 7, which would reasonably
ensure that a member's qualification for various pricing programs would
be based on the data that the Exchange believes is accurate. The
Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change is reasonable
because the SIAC systems issue that caused inaccurate transaction data
was not within the Exchange's control nor can the Exchange correct or
otherwise remediate the issue. Including August 12, 2019 transaction
and quotation data for purposes of tier calculations described in
Equity 7 under the heading Order Execution and Routing could result in
inaccurate determinations for member rates based on the extent to which
their transactions and quotations were impacted by the August 12, 2019
event in comparison to the overall inaccuracies in the data provided by
SIAC for that date. Consequently, the Exchange believes that the
proposed change is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it
would result in all market participants on the Exchange being treated
equally by excluding August 12, 2019 from all tier calculations
described in the Order Execution and Routing section under Equity 7.
Last, excluding August 12, 2019 from all tier calculations described

in the Order Execution and Routing section under Equity 7 is in the
public interest because it will provide Exchange members with the
closest approximation of the fees and credits that they would have been
eligible for if accurate data for August 12, 2019 were available and
included in the monthly calculation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change would
treat all market participants on the Exchange equally by excluding
August 12, 2019 from all tier calculations described in Equity 7.
Moreover, the Exchange believes that the proposed change would enhance
competition between competing marketplaces by enabling the Exchange to
fairly assess its members fees and to apply credits in light of systems
issues that occurred, which are beyond the control of the Exchange.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \10\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \11\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay. The
Exchange begins the calculation and billing of member fees and credits
in the Order Execution and Routing section under Equity 7 at the close
of each month, and an operative delay would disrupt the normal billing
process, which may cause expense and potential investor confusion.
Therefore, the Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest. Accordingly, the Commission hereby waives the operative delay
and designates the proposal as operative upon filing.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \12\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission also has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2019-31 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2019-31. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2019-31 and should be submitted on
or before September 27, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-19222 Filed 9-5-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D. C. 20460 April 13, 2005 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES Memorandum SUBJECT: Benefits Assessment for Dicofol on Citrus: Oranges, Grapefruit, Tangerines, and Tangelos FROM: Don Atwood, Entomologist Biological Analysis Branch Steve Smearman, Economist Economic Analysis Branch Biological and Economic Analysis Division ( 7503C)

THRU: Arnet Jones, Branch Chief Biological Analysis Branch David Widawsky, Branch Chief Economic Analysis Branch Biological and Economic Analysis Division ( 7503C)

Peer Review Panel Date: December 15, 2004 TO: Mika Hunter, Chemical Review Manager Special Review Branch Special Review and Reregistration Division ( 7508C)

SUMMARY BEAD was asked by SRRD to determine the biological and economic impacts of extending the restricted entry intervals ( REI's) for dicofol use on citrus based on worker exposure concerns of HED. Dicofol is applied to citrus to control a complex of mites including spider mites and rust mites. Citrus are primarily produced in Arizona, California, Florida, and Texas in the US. This analysis assesses the use of dicofol to control mites on oranges, grapefruit, tangerines and tangelos. No significant usage of dicofol was found on oranges, tangelos, or tangerines. The only citrus crop of concern is grapefruit with primary usage in Texas ( 25% of crop treated). BEAD believes that there will be no impact on grapefruit production in Texas if dicofol REI's are extended, as dicofol use will be shifted in the rotational spray program to a period where field activities will not be restricted In addition, even with an extended REI, dicofol 2 application would still be an option during the non harvest period ( June Sept). Regardless, numerous alternative miticides are available which are both efficacious and cost effective. BEAD believes there would be no biological or economic impact from extension of the dicofol REI.

BACKGROUND Citrus production begins with grove establishment or replacement. In general, the average rate of grove replacement is 3% annually. Trees do not produce fruit for the first 3 years. At any time commercial groves contain 90% bearing trees. Trees are commonly spaced in a 15 feet square pattern yielding 194 trees per acre. This spacing provides an almost continuous canopy and maximizes land use, water and energy. Bearing trees are mechanically hedged to keep row middles open for harvesting operations and to allow maximum light penetration. All hedging and tree topping occurs following harvest. Trees are topped at a height which will allow pickers access to all fruit using 20 foot ladders. Hand pruning is only done after catastrophic incidents.

About 60% of new leaf growth appears in the spring with the remainder occurring in late summer. Flowering also begins in March for most citrus. Except for Valencia oranges, most citrus only have one crop of fruit on the trees after bloom. The bloom period affects the timing of pest control operations as well as the setting of bees for pollination, highly important for citrus hybrids. Irrigation must be set to water trees during bloom and early fruit set. Irrigation is also used for freeze protection for trees up to 5 years of age. Ninety five percent of acreage now uses micro sprinkler systems for under canopy irrigation.

Unlike other fruit, citrus must mature on the tree. Fruit must be sampled to determine the amount of sugar prior to harvest and the acid to sugar ratio. In Florida, 85% of orange production is for processing with the rest fresh marketed. Grapefruit and tangerine/ hybrids are produced for the fresh market in Florida. Rind color and quality are crucial only to the fresh fruit market. Rejected fresh fruit is processed and may result in approximately half of the grapefruit and tangerine/ hybrids being processed. Citrus fruit ripens throughout the year based on species or variety. Harvest occurs thoughout the year. Approximately 97% of citrus is hand harvested. Oranges, grapefruit, and tangerines/ hybrids mature and are ready to be picked in all months but September and August.

There are five periods during which pesticides are applied. Post bloom sprays take 2  7 weeks to complete and are targeted at citrus rust mites. The second spray is often the same as the first spray and is applied over 5 weeks between mid April and the end of May. The third, summer spray, occurs in June or July and is generally a petroleum oil spray, though it may also contain other active ingredients. The fall spray is conducted after mid August through year end. These sprays are often miticides to control rust and/ or spider mites on fresh market fruit. A fifth spray can occur as a supplement to the fall spray on as needed basis.

PRODUCTION, USE AND USAGE DATA 3 In 2003, citrus was produced on 983,600 acres in the US, classifying citrus as a major crop ( Table 1). Oranges accounted for 77.4% of citrus acreage followed by grapefruit ( 11.7%), lemons ( 6.1%), tangerines ( 3.8%) and all others at less than 1% of total acreage in production. Nationally in 2003, approximately 69% of the citrus acreage was in Florida followed by California with 25.4%, Arizona ( 2.8%) and Texas ( 2.8%) ( Table 2).

Table 1. US citrus production in 2003. ( Citrus Fruits 2003 Summary, USDA/ NASS)

Crop Bearing Acreage ( Acres) Production ( 1000 tons) Value of Production1 ( 1000 $)

Oranges 761400 12,930 1,645,856 Grapefruit 114800 2,152 296,777 Lemons 59800 798 269,753 Limes2 NA NA NA Tangelos3 8000 45 9871 Tangerines 36200 435 125301 Temples 3,400 63 4806 1 Packinghouse door equivalents 2 Estimates discontinued as of 2002 03 crop 3. Florida Only.

Table 2. 2003 Citrus production by State. ( Citrus Fruits 2003 Summary, USDA/ NASS)

State Bearing Acreage ( Acres) Production ( 1000 tons) Value of Production1 ( 1000 $)

Arizona 27,300 163 41393 California 250000 2917 908381 Florida 679000 13045 1372795 Texas 27300 298 29795 US 983600 16423 2352364 1 Packinghouse door equivalents By crop and State, Florida led all States in 2003 in all citrus production with 79% of production. 587,600 acres or 75 percent of the oranges were produced in Florida with the remainder grown in California ( Table 3). Florida also accounted for the lion's share of the grapefruit production as well with 95,500 acres or 75 percent followed by Texas with 18,500 4 acres or 14.5 percent and California with 13,500 acres or 10.5 percent. For tangerines, Florida accounted for 21,700 of the 33,900 acres produced or 64 percent with California producing the remaining 35 percent. For tangelos, Florida accounted for all of the 9,100 acres in production.

On the national level, less than 2% of citrus acres are treated with dicofol. Data indicates that dicofol usage on tangelos in Florida, all US production, is less than 1% of the total crop ( personal communication with Phil Stansley). Less than 5% of tangerines, primarily Arizona, are treated annually with dicofol. Dicofol usage on oranges is 2% of the crop treated annually. In contrast, national dicofol usage on grapefruit is 7% of acres treated. At the State level, Texas has the greatest dicofol usage with 25% of the grapefruit acreage treated. Due to the minor use of dicofol on oranges, tangelos, and tangerines, only dicofol use on Texas grapefruit is addressed in this analysis.

TARGET PEST FOR DICOFOL ON GRAPEFRUIT The mite pests in Texas grapefruit include rust mites ( citrus rust mite) and spider mites ( citrus red mite, Texas citrus mite, and false spider mite). Many factors are involved which affect mite abundance and potential for injury to the tree and crop. Reduction or elimination of pesticides such as copper, copper plus oil, and sulfur can avoid flare ups of secondary pests such as spider mites to primary pest status. Spider mites are generally controlled during normal spray routines for managing rust mites. It is recommended that all insecticides, other than petroleum oil, should be used only once a year to minimize development of resistant populations. Mite build up in the spring and summer is not as much concern as during the fall.

Citrus rust mite  Citrus rust mite is an important pest of fruit grown for the fresh market. The citrus rust mite feeds on both fruit and foliage. Feeding on fruit generally occurs when the fruit is 0.5 inch or larger. Surface feeding on fruit causes cell destruction and ultimately a russeting appearance. On severely damaged fruit the rind will crack. Rust mite damage during exponential growth, before fruit maturity, may result in smaller fruit. While the primary effect of fruit damage caused by rust mites appears to be a reduction in grade, other conditions have been associated with severe fruit injury that include reduced size, increased water loss, and increased drop. Female citrus rust mites lay an average of 20 eggs on fruit or leaf surfaces. The entire rust mite life cycle can be completed in 7 10 days in the summer, but may take 20 or more days in the winter. Numerous overlapping generations can occur during a single season.

Texas citrus mite  Texas citrus mite is among the most destructive pests of citrus fruits. Texas citrus mite feeding injury is characterized by minute chlorotic spots that gradually become so abundant that infested leaves take on a silvery appearance. Heavy feeding damage can cause defoliation, which is generally more severe in early fall. These mites primarily feed on upper leaf surfaces and seldom on fruit. Under favorable conditions, a generation of the Texas citrus mite may be completed in 3 weeks. Populations are hampered by high humidity and rainfall.

Citrus red mite  Citrus red mite feeds on both leaves and fruit. On leaves, citrus red mite 5 feeding results in a pale stippling visible primarily on the upper surface of the leaf. In severe infestations, the stippling enlarges to dry necrotic areas ( commonly called mesophyll collapse). Eventually, leaves may drop and twigs dieback. Defoliation is especially severe when trees under water stress are subject to drying winds. Stippling or silvering also occurs on green fruit but usually disappears when fruit change color. If large populations feed on nearly mature fruit, the silvering may persist. High populations can also cause fruit sunburn during hot weather as result of defoliation. Each red mite female lays from 20 50 eggs along the mid rib on both the top and bottom of citrus leaves. The entire life cycle can be completed in as short as 3 weeks during the summer, but development may take 5 or more weeks in the winter.

False spider mite  False spider mites feed on fruit and leaves causing undesirable blemishes referred to as ` nail head' rust. False spider mites are most numerous in the interior tree canopy, where fruit spotting generally first appears. Spots are brown, irregular shaped pin points to 1/ 4 inch, or larger, in diameter and are often raised. Spotting occurs on any part of the fruit and less frequently on upper and lower leaf surfaces. In extreme cases the spots coalesce to cover large areas on fruit and leaves. Each female lays an average of 25 eggs which are glued singly to the leaf surface. Developmental time from egg to mature adult requires nearly 4 weeks in the summer. Several false spider mite generations can occur in a single season.

The need for chemical treatments to control mites is dictated by numerous biological attributes of the mites, marketing objectives for the fruit, and horticultural practices. These key biological factors include: 1) inherent ability of mites to quickly increase to injurious densities on fruit and sustain the potential for reproductive increase over time; and 2) small size, which makes it difficult to monitor population densities in the field and detect injurious levels until visible injury has occurred on the fruit. The marketing objective for fruit is particularly important. Cosmetic appearance is a priority for fruit grown for the fresh market. Fruit growth and abscission are not affected until 50 to 75% of the surface has been injured. Thus, there is reduced justification for chemical control of rust mites on fruit grown for processing. Citrus groves producing fruit designated for the fresh market may receive three or four miticides per year. In contrast, groves producing fruit designated for processing receive zero to two treatments per year.

Spider mites are suppressed to low densities by several species of predacious mites, insects, and entomopathogens in some groves. However, when populations averaging 5 to 10 motile spider mites per leaf develop between September and May it would be reasonable to apply a miticide, especially if the trees are stressed. However, infestations comprised predominantly of adults, particularly males, are in decline and would not require control. Adult mites are recognized by their large size relative to immatures and females distinguished by their round shape and shorter legs compared to males.

Need for controlling spider mites is based on temperature and humidity conditions, spider mite population levels, tree vigor, and time of the year. Petroleum oil provides some ovicidal activity against spider mite eggs. None of the other miticides provide ovicidal activity, and their residual activity must be sufficiently long lasting to kill subsequently emerging larvae. 6 ALTERNATIVE MITICIDES FOR USE ON GRAPEFRUIT There are a number of efficacious miticides available to control rust mites and spider mites on Texas grapefruit ( Table 3). Dicofol is only considered helpful for rust mite control but is considered effective against spider mites. Table 4 provides the recommended spray program for grapefruit in Texas.

Table 3. Efficacious alternatives to dicofol to control rust and spider mites on Texas grapefruit and their cost.

Pest Miticide Rate/ Acre REI ( hours) Cost/ Acre ($)

Rust Mite abamectin 10 20 oz 12 NA*

formetanate hydrochloride ½  1 1/ 4 lb 48 29.83 diflubenzuron 6.25 oz 12 NA pyridaben 5.2 10.67 oz 12 29.83 aldicarb 33 lb 48 121.00 fenbutatin oxide 2 3 lb 48 42.16 oxamyl 2 4 pt 48 NA dicofol 6 pt 12 11.45 Spider Mite propargite 2 3 pt 48 NA fenpropathrin 16 21oz 24 NA pyridaben 5.2 10.67 oz 12 29.83 fenbutatin oxide 2 3 lb 48 42.16 dicofol 6 pt 12 11.45 * NA = Not Available 7 Table 4. Spray program for Texas grapefruit Timing Months Pest Miticide Postbloom March May Rust & Spider Mite fenbutatin oxide dicofol pyridaben fenpropathrin Rust Mite abamectin + oil diflubenzuron + oil formetanate hydrochloride oxamyl Rust Mite & Citrus Nematode aldicarb Summer June July Rust Mites abamectin + oil diflubenzuron + oil fenbutatin oxide Late Summer Fall August October All Mites fenbutatin oxide dicofol pyridaben fenpropathrin Winter November Spider Mites propargite ( no oil)

IMPACT OF INCREASED RESTRICTED ENTRY INTERVALS The current REI for dicofol application on grapefruit is 12 hours. New labeling increases the REI to 58 87 days for high contact activities ( harvest) and from 46 71 days for medium contact activities ( pruning), the only activities of concern, depending on whether applied at maximum or minimum rate. Appendix A provides information on mite occurrence as related to pruning and harvest, the only field activities of concern.

Grapefruit harvest is rarely completed before spring bloom, so the grower must decide to prune at the preferred time ( cool months) and sacrifice part of the unharvested crop or wait until spring flush hardens in April which means sacrificing some of the next year's crop. Dicofol would still be available for use during the early post bloom production period when pruning was delayed to late fall and winter. State experts indicate that dicofol would be used as the first miticidal spray when no field activities would be restricted by the extended REI. ( Personal communication with J. French). Dicofol use in other periods would conflict with field activities, harvest, and result in the use of an alternative miticide with a more acceptable REI. Regardless, there are sufficient efficacious alternatives to dicofol for use in the other production periods which have acceptable 8 REI's. No biological impact is expected by extension of dicofol REI's for Texas grapefruit as growers will only switch the timing of dicofol application in their IPM program..

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF INCREASED REI'S No economic impact is expected as dicofol use can be maintained for post bloom application. In addition, dicofol is only recommended to be used once annually in a rotational miticide IPM program. No changes in use will occur other than a shifting of dicofol in the spray schedule indicating no change in miticide application economics.

CONCLUSIONS There will be no biological or economic impact from extension of the REI's for dicofol use on citrus. Dicofol can still be effectively used during the normal period of mite outbreaks with no adverse impact on field activities.

LITERATURE CITED Citrus Fruits 2004 Summary. September 2004. USDA/ NASS http:// usda. mannlib. cornell. edu/ reports/ nassr/ fruit/ zcf bb/ cfrt0904. pdf 2004 Florida Citrus Pest Management Guide: Rust Mites, Spider Mites, and Other Phytophagous Mites. University of Florida IFAS Extension. http:// edis. ifas. ufl. edu/ CG002 Crop Knowledge Master  Texas citrus mite. Dept. of Entomology  University of Hawaii. http:// www. extento. hawaii. edu/ kbase/ crop/ Type/ e_ banksi. htm Citrus red mite. UC Pest Management Guidelines. http:// www. ipm. ucdavis. edu/ PMG/ r107400111. html Citrus Red Mite: a Potential Damaging Pest of Texas Citrus. 1980. Journal Rio Grande Valley Horticultural Society, Vol. 34. http:// primera. tamu. edu/ kcchome/ pubs/ redmitedamage. htm Mites on Texas Citrus. JV French. Texas Agricultural Extension Service. http:// primera. tamu. edu/ kcchome/ pubs/ mitepublication. htm Citrus Center 2004 2005 Pest Control Guide http:// primera. tamu. edu/ kcchome/ pubs/ sprayguide. htm Texas Citrus  Mites: Description and Biology. Texas Agricultural Extension Service. http:// aggie horticulture. tamu. edu/ citrus/ 12309. htm 9 Agricultural Chemical Usage  2003 Fruit Summary. August 2004. USDA/ NASS. http:// usda. mannlib. cornell. edu/ reports/ nassr/ other/ pcu bb/ agcf0804. pdf Agricultural Chemical Usage  2001 Fruit Summary. August 2002. USDA/ NASS. http:// usda. mannlib. cornell. edu/ reports/ nassr/ other/ pcu bb/ agcf0802. pdf Agricultural Chemical Usage  1999 Fruit Summary. July 2000. USDA/ NASS. http:// usda. mannlib. cornell. edu/ reports/ nassr/ other/ pcu bb/ agch0700. pdf Personal communication with Dr. J Victor French. November 2004. Texas Agricultural Extension Service. 10 APPENDIX A Crop Development J F M A M J J A S O N D Post bloom Summer Late Summer  Fall Winter Cultural Practices J F M A M J J A S O N D Harvest Pruning Pest Management Activities J F M A M J J A S O N D Soil Sampling Scouting Mitcide Application 11


[Federal Register: June 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 109)]
[Notices]
[Page 32461-32463]
[DOCID:fr08jn10-91]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-ORD-2010-0381; FRL-9159-9]

Human Studies Review Board; Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA or Agency)
Office of the Science Advisor (OSA) announces a public meeting of the
Human Studies Review Board (HSRB) to advise the Agency on EPA's
scientific and ethical reviews of research with human subjects.

DATES: The public meeting will be held on June 23, 2010, from
approximately 10 a.m. to approximately 5:30 p.m., Eastern Time.
    Location: Environmental Protection Agency, Conference Center--Lobby
Level, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Drive,
Arlington, VA 22202.
    Meeting Access: Seating at the meeting will be on a first-come
basis. To request accommodation of a disability, please contact the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT at least 10
business days prior to the meeting, to allow EPA as much time as
possible to process your request.
    Procedures for Providing Public Input: Interested members of the
public may submit relevant written or oral comments for the HSRB to
consider during the advisory process. Additional information concerning
submission of relevant written or oral comments is provided in section
I., under subsection D., SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any member of the public who wishes
further information should contact Jim Downing, EPA, Office of the
Science Advisor, (8105R), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202)
564-2468; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail addresses<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
General information concerning the EPA HSRB can be found on the EPA Web
site at http://www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/.

ADDRESSES: Submit your written comments, identified by Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-ORD-2010-0381, by one of the following methods:
    Internet: http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
    E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Mail: Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC),
ORD Docket, Mailcode: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW., Washington,
DC 20460.
    Hand Delivery: The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is located in the EPA
Headquarters Library, Room Number 3334 in the EPA West Building,
located at 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. The hours
of operation are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. Please call<PHONE_NUMBER> or e-
mail the ORD Docket at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for instructions. Updates to
Public Reading Room access are available on the Web site (http://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm).
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-ORD-
2010-0381. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA, without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Public Meeting

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. This action may,
however, be of interest to persons who conduct or assess human studies,
especially studies on substances regulated by EPA, or to

persons who are, or may be required to conduct testing of chemical
substances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) or
the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Since
other entities may also be interested, the Agency has not attempted to
describe all the specific entities that may be affected by this action.
If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to
a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How can I access electronic copies of this document and other
related information?

    In addition to using regulations.gov, you may access this Federal
Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the
Federal Register listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the ORD Docket, EPA/
DC, Public Reading Room. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is located in
the EPA Headquarters Library, Room Number 3334 in the EPA West
Building, located at 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
The hours of operation are 8:30 am to 4:30 p.m. EST, Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. Please call<PHONE_NUMBER> or e-
mail the ORD Docket at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for instructions. Updates to
Public Reading Room access are available on the Web site (http://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm). EPA's position paper(s), charge/
questions to the HSRB, and the meeting agenda will be available by
early June 2010. In addition, the Agency may provide additional
background documents as the materials become available. You may obtain
electronic copies of these documents, and certain other related
documents that might be available electronically, from the
regulations.gov Web site and the EPA HSRB Web site at http://
www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/. For questions on document availability, or if
you do not have access to the Internet, consult the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
    1. Explain your views as clearly as possible.
    2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
    3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data that you
used to support your views.
    4. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    5. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.

D. How may I participate in this meeting?

    You may participate in this meeting by following the instructions
in this section. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, it is imperative that
you identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-ORD-2010-0381 in the subject line
on the first page of your request.
    1. Oral comments. Requests to present oral comments will be
accepted up to June 16, 2010. To the extent that time permits,
interested persons who have not pre-registered may be permitted by the
Chair of the HSRB to present oral comments at the meeting. Each
individual or group wishing to make brief oral comments to the HSRB is
strongly advised to submit their request (preferably via e-mail) to the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT no later than noon,
Eastern Time, June 16, 2010, in order to be included on the meeting
agenda, and to provide sufficient time for the HSRB Chair and HSRB
Designated Federal Officer (DFO) to review the agenda to provide an
appropriate public comment period. The request should identify the name
of the individual making the presentation, the organization (if any)
the individual will represent, and any requirements for audiovisual
equipment (e.g., overhead projector, LCD projector, chalkboard). Oral
comments before the HSRB are limited to five minutes per individual or
organization. Please note that this limit applies to the cumulative
time used by all individuals appearing either as part of, or on behalf
of an organization. While it is our intent to hear a full range of oral
comments on the science and ethics issues under discussion, it is not
our intent to permit organizations to expand these time limitations by
having numerous individuals sign up separately to speak on their
behalf. If additional time is available, there may be flexibility in
time for public comments. Each speaker should bring 25 copies of his or
her comments and presentation slides for distribution to the HSRB at
the meeting.
    2. Written comments. Although you may submit written comments at
any time, for the HSRB to have the best opportunity to review and
consider your comments as it deliberates on its report, you should
submit your comments at least five business days prior to the beginning
of the meeting. If you submit comments after this date, those comments
will be provided to the Board members, but you should recognize that
the Board members may not have adequate time to consider those comments
prior to making a decision. Thus, if you plan to submit written
comments, the Agency strongly encourages you to submit such comments no
later than noon, Eastern Time, June 16, 2010. You should submit your
comments using the instructions in section I., under subsection C.,
``What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?'' above in
this notice. In addition, the Agency also requests that person(s)
submitting comments directly to the docket also provide a copy of their
comments to the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
There is no limit on the length of written comments for consideration
by the HSRB.

 E. Background

    1. Topics for discussion. The HSRB is a Federal advisory committee
operating in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)
5 U.S.C. App. 2 section 9. The HSRB provides advice, information, and
recommendations to EPA on issues related to scientific and ethical
aspects of human subjects research. The major objectives of the HSRB
are to provide advice and recommendations on: (1) Research proposals
and protocols; (2) reports of completed research with human subjects;
and (3) how to strengthen EPA's programs for protection of human
subjects of research. The HSRB reports to the EPA Administrator through
EPA's Science Advisor.
    At its meeting on June 23, 2010, EPA's Human Studies Review Board
will consider scientific and ethical issues surrounding these topics:
    (a) The unpublished report of the completed Carroll-Loye Biological
Research, Inc. study LNX-002: Field Repellency of Two Picaridin-Based
Personal Insect Repellents to Black Flies. The protocol for this study
was

reviewed favorably by the HSRB at their meeting in June 2009. EPA seeks
the advice of the HSRB on the scientific soundness of this completed
study for use to estimate the duration of complete protection against
black flies provided by the tested repellents, and on whether available
information supports a determination that the study was conducted in
substantial compliance with subparts K and L of 40 CFR part 26.
    (b) The unpublished report of the completed Carroll-Loye Biological
Research, Inc. study LNX-003: Laboratory Repellency of Two Picaridin-
Based Personal Insect Repellents to Two Species of Ticks. The protocol
for this study was reviewed favorably by the HSRB at their meeting in
October 2009. EPA seeks the advice of the HSRB on the scientific
soundness of this completed study for use to estimate the duration of
complete protection against ticks provided by the tested repellents,
and on whether available information supports a determination that the
study was conducted in substantial compliance with subparts K and L of
40 CFR Part 26.
    (c) In addition, EPA will present to the HSRB update reports on two
topics of interest:
    (1) The revised guideline for performance testing of topically
applied repellent products, for use by investigators and sponsors of
new studies
    (2) The terms of a recent settlement of litigation related to EPA's
2006 rule for the protection of human subjects of research, in which
EPA has agreed to initiate rulemaking to amend the 2006 rule.
    2. Meeting minutes and reports. Minutes of the meeting, summarizing
the matters discussed and recommendations, if any, made by the advisory
committee regarding such matters, will be released within 90 calendar
days of the meeting. Such minutes will be available at http://
www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/ and http://www.regulations.gov. In addition,
information concerning a Board meeting report, if applicable, can be
found at http://www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/ or from the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

Kevin Teichman,
EPA Science Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-13684 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 231 (Friday, December 2, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73930-73931]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26169]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0312; Airspace Docket No. 22-AAL-20]
RIN 2120-AA66

Revocation of Colored Federal Airway Blue 37 (B-37); Level
Island, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action revokes Colored Federal airway Blue 37 (B-37) due
to the planned decommissioning of the Sumner Strait, AK (SQM), Non-
Directional Beacon (NDB) in the vicinity of Level Island, AK.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, February 23, 2023. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11
and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Rules and Regulations Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it modifies the route structure as necessary to preserve
the safe and efficient flow of air traffic

within the National Airspace System (NAS).

Background

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for Docket
No. FAA-2022-0311 in the Federal Register (87 FR 19409; April 4, 2022),
revoking Colored Federal airway B-37 due to the planned decommissioning
of the Sumner Strait, AK, NDB. Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting comments on the
proposal. No comments were received.
    Blue Federal airways are published in paragraph 6009(d) of FAA
Order JO 7400.11G, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September 15,
2022, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Colored
Federal airway listed in this document will be published subsequently
in FAA Order JO 7400.11.

Differences From the NPRM

    Subsequent to the NPRM, the FAA identified an inadvertent
typographical error that listed the Docket No. as FAA-2022-0311 in
error. The correct Docket No. for this rulemaking is FAA-2022-0312.
This action corrects the Docket No. typographical error to reflect it
as FAA-2022-0312.
    The rulemaking action to revoke B-37 is unaffected by this
administrative error correction.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September
15, 2022. FAA Order JO 7400.11G is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11G lists Class
A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This action amends 14 CFR part 71 by revoking Colored Federal
airway B-37 due to the planned decommissioning of the Sumner Strait,
AK, NDB in the vicinity of Level Island, AK. The amendment is described
below.
    B-37: B-37 extends between the Sumner Strait, AK, NDB and the
intersection of the Elephant, AK, NDB 272[deg] and the Ocean Cape, AK,
NDB 139[deg] bearings (SPARL Fix). The airway is removed in its
entirety.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this airspace action of revoking
Colored Federal airway B-37, due to the planned decommissioning of the
Sumner Strait, AK, NDB, qualifies for categorical exclusion under the
National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  4321 et seq.)
and its implementing regulations at 40 CFR part 1500, and in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures,
paragraph 5-6.5a, which categorically excludes from further
environmental impact review rulemaking actions that designate or modify
classes of airspace areas, airways, routes, and reporting points (see
14 CFR part 71, Designation of Class A, B, C, D, and E Airspace Areas;
Air Traffic Service Routes; and Reporting Points), and paragraph 5-
6.5k, which categorically excludes from further environmental review
the publication of existing air traffic control procedures that do not
essentially change existing tracks, create new tracks, change altitude,
or change concentration of aircraft on these tracks. As such, this
action is not expected to result in any potentially significant
environmental impacts. In accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, paragraph
5-2 regarding Extraordinary Circumstances, the FAA has reviewed this
action for factors and circumstances in which a normally categorically
excluded action may have a significant environmental impact requiring
further analysis. Accordingly, the FAA has determined that no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment or environmental impact study.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 19,
2022, and effective September 15, 2022, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6009(d) Blue Federal Airways.

* * * * *

B-37 [Removed]

* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 28, 2022.
Scott M. Rosenbloom,
Manager, Airspace Rules and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2022-26169 Filed 12-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: April 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 62)]
[Notices]
[Page 16448-16449]
[DOCID:fr01ap10-50]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12737-002]

Jordan Limited Partnership; Notice of Application Ready for
Environmental Analysis and Soliciting Comments, Recommendations, Terms
and Conditions, and Prescriptions

March 25, 2010.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Original License.
    b. Project No.: P-12737-002.
    c. Date Filed: April 16, 2009.
    d. Applicant: Jordan Limited Partnership.
    e. Name of Project: Gathright Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Jackson River in Alleghany County, Virginia at
the existing U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Gathright Dam.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. James B. Price, W.V. Hydro, Inc., P.O.
Box 903, Gatlinburg, Tennessee 37738<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Jeffrey Browning,<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, recommendations, terms and
conditions, and prescriptions is 60 days from the issuance of this
notice; reply comments are due 105 days from the issuance date of this
notice.
    All documents may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site (http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ferconline.asp) under the
``eFiling'' link. For a simpler method of submitting text only
comments, click on ``Quick Comment.'' For assistance, please contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>call toll-free at
(866) 208-3676; or, for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the
Commission strongly encourages electronic filing, documents may also be
paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an original and eight copies to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency.
    k. This application has been accepted and is now ready for
environmental analysis.
    l. The proposed Gathright Project would be located at the existing
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Gathright Dam. The existing Corps
facilities consist of: (1) The 257-foot-high, 1,172-foot-long rock-fill
Gathright Dam with an impervious core with a 32-foot-wide top; (2) the
2,530-acre Lake Moomaw at a normal conservation pool water surface
elevation of 1,582.0 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum; (3) an
outlet works comprised of an intake tower with 10 water quality intake
gates, two intake tunnel passageways (north and south), an outlet
tunnel, a stilling basin and outlet channel; and (4) an emergency
spillway located 2.4-miles south of the dam comprised of an ungated and
unpaved 2,680-foot-long, 100-foot-wide trapezoidal channel.
    The proposed project would utilize the head created by the existing
Corps dam and consist of: (1) A new 155-foot-high, 16-foot-wide, 10-
foot-deep intake module attached to the existing intake tower upstream
of the south tunnel passageway trashrack; (2) one new 3.7-megawatt
generating unit attached to the top of the intake module; (3) one new
Francis turbine and draft tube at the bottom of the intake module; (4)
a new 0.94-mile-long, 46-kilovolt transmission line; and (5)
appurtenant facilities.
    The project would be operated in run-of-river mode in that it would
have no storage and only use flows released by the Corps in accordance
with its present operations.
    m. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item h above.
    All filings must (1) bear in all capital letters the title
``COMMENTS'', ``REPLY COMMENTS'', ``RECOMMENDATIONS,'' ``TERMS AND
CONDITIONS,'' or ``PRESCRIPTIONS;'' (2) set forth in the heading the
name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address,

and telephone number of the person submitting the filing; and (4)
otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through
385.2005. All comments, recommendations, terms and conditions or
prescriptions must set forth their evidentiary basis and otherwise
comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may obtain
copies of the application directly from the applicant. Each filing must
be accompanied by proof of service on all persons listed on the service
list prepared by the Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with
18 CFR 4.34(b), and 385.2010.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filings and
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support.
    n. Public notice of the filing of the initial development
application, which has already been given, established the due date for
filing competing applications or notices of intent. Under the
Commission's regulations, any competing development application must be
filed in response to and in compliance with public notice of the
initial development application. No competing applications or notices
of intent may be filed in response to this notice.
    o. Procedural schedule: The application will be processed according
to the following Hydro Licensing Schedule. Revisions to the schedule
will be made as appropriate. The Commission staff proposes to issue one
environmental assessment rather than issue a draft and final EA.
Comments, terms and conditions, recommendations, prescriptions, and
reply comments, if any, will be addressed in an EA. Staff intents to
give at least 30 days for entities to comment on the EA, and will take
into consideration all comments received on the EA before final action
is taken on the license application.
    Notice of the availability of the EA, November 2010.
    p. A license applicant must file no later than 60 days following
the date of issuance of this notice: (1) A copy of the water quality
certification; (2) a copy of the request for certification, including
proof of the date on which the certifying agency received the request;
or (3) evidence of waiver of water quality certification.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-7299 Filed 3-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P