[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 167 (Monday, August 29, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53633-53636]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21876]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0597; Directorate Identifier 2011-CE-019-AD;
Amendment 39-16793; AD 2011-18-11]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate
No. A-815 Formerly Held by Bombardier Inc. and de Havilland, Inc.)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Viking Air Limited (type certificate No. A-815 formerly held by
Bombardier Inc. and de Havilland, Inc.) Model DHC-3 airplanes. That AD
currently requires repetitively inspecting the elevator control tabs
for discrepancies, taking necessary corrective actions to bring all
discrepancies within acceptable tolerances, and reporting certain
inspection results to the FAA. This new AD retains the actions
currently required in AD 2011-05-02 and removes the Supplemental Type
Certificate (STC) SA01059SE condition in the Applicability section.
This AD was prompted by our determination that we inadvertently omitted
certain airplanes from the Applicability section. We are issuing this
AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective October 3, 2011.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain other publications listed in this AD as of March
31, 2011 (76 FR 10220, February 24, 2011).

ADDRESSES: For information about the revisions to the FAA-approved
maintenance/inspection program identified in this AD, contact Viking
Air Ltd., 9574 Hampden Road, Sidney, BC Canada V8L 5V5; telephone:
(800) 663-8444; Internet: http://www.vikingair.com. You may review
copies of the referenced revisions at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Duckett, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (516)
794-5531; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2011-05-02, Amendment 39-16611 (76 FR 10220,
February 24, 2011). That AD applies to the specified products. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on June 10, 2011 (76 FR 34011). That
NPRM proposed to retain all of the requirements of AD 2011-05-02 and
add airplanes to the Applicability section removing the Supplemental
Type Certificate (STC) SA01059SE condition.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Interim Action

    We are continuing to evaluate the cause of the unsafe condition
identified in this AD to enable us to obtain better insight into the
nature, cause, and extent of excessive free-play in the elevator
control tabs. Based on this evaluation, we may consider further
rulemaking.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 65 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
             Action                   Labor cost          Parts cost       Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection......................  1 work-hour x $85   Not applicable....  $85 per inspection  $5,525 per
                                   per hour = $85                          cycle.              inspection cycle.
                                   per inspection
                                   cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     We estimate the following costs to do any necessary follow-on
actions that will be required based on the results of the inspection.
We have no way of determining the number of airplanes that may need
this repair/replacement:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                    Action                                    Labor cost                 Parts cost    product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum repair................................  1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85......          $50         $135

Moderate repair...............................  3 work-hours x $85 per hour = $255....          150          405
Maximum repair................................  6 work-hours x $85 per hour = $510....          450          960
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2011-05-02, Amendment 39-16611 (76 FR 10220, February 24, 2011), and
adding the following new AD:

2011-18-11 Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate No. A-815 Formerly
Held by Bombardier Inc. and de Havilland, Inc.): Amendment 39-16793;
Docket No. FAA-2011-0597; Directorate Identifier 2011-CE-019-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective October 3, 2011.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD supersedes AD 2011-05-02, Amendment 39-16611 (76 FR
10220, February 24, 2011).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Viking Air Limited (type certificate No. A-
815 formerly held by Bombardier Inc. and de Havilland, Inc.) Model
DHC-3 airplanes, all serial numbers, that are certificated in any
category.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 27, Flight Controls.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD results from an evaluation of revisions to the
manufacturer's maintenance manual that adds new repetitive
inspections to the elevator control tabs. To require compliance with
these inspections for U.S. owners and operators we are mandating
these inspections through the rulemaking process. We are issuing
this AD to add new repetitive inspections of the elevator control
tabs. If these inspections are not done, excessive free-play in the
elevator control tabs could develop. This condition could lead to
loss of tab control linkage and severe elevator flutter. Such
elevator flutter could lead to possible loss of control.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Actions                  Compliance          Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Inspect the elevator control  (i) For airplanes   Following Viking
 tabs for discrepancies.           previously          DHC-3 Otter
                                   affected by AD      Maintenance
                                   2011-05-02 (76 FR   Manual Temporary
                                   10220, February     Revisions No. 18,
                                   24, 2011):          No. 19, and No.
                                   Initially within    20, all dated
                                   the next 50 hours   December 5, 2008.
                                   time-in-service
                                   (TIS) after March
                                   31, 2011 (the
                                   effective date
                                   retained from AD
                                   2011-05-02).
                                  (ii) For airplanes
                                   not previously
                                   affected by AD
                                   2011-05-02 (76 FR
                                   10220, February
                                   24, 2011):
                                   Initially within
                                   the next 50 hours
                                   time-in-service
                                   (TIS) after
                                   October 3, 2011
                                   (the effective
                                   date of this AD).
                                  (iii) For all
                                   affected
                                   airplanes:
                                   Repetitively
                                   thereafter
                                   inspect at
                                   intervals not to
                                   exceed 100 hours
                                   TIS.
(2) If any discrepancies are      For all affected    Following Viking
 found during any inspection       airplanes: Before   DHC-3 Otter
 required in paragraph (f)(1) of   further flight      Maintenance
 this AD, take necessary           after any           Manual Temporary
 corrective actions to bring all   inspection          Revisions No. 18,
 discrepancies within acceptable   required in         No. 19, and No.
 tolerances.                       paragraph (f)(1)    20, all dated
                                   of this AD in       December 5, 2008.
                                   which
                                   discrepancies are
                                   found.

(3) If, during any inspection     For all affected    Use the form
 required in paragraph (f)(1) of   airplanes: Within   (figure 1 of this
 this AD, the total maximum free   30 days after the   AD) and submit it
 play of the elevator servo tab    inspection or       to FAA, Small
 and trim tab relative to the      within the next     Airplane
 elevator exceeds 1.0 degree       10 days after       Directorate,
 (this is equal to a maximum       October 3, 2011     Attn: Jim
 displacement of 0.070'' at the    (the effective      Rutherford, 901
 trailing edge), report the        date of this AD),   Locust, Room 301,
 results of the inspection to      whichever occurs    Kansas City,
 the FAA.                          later. For          Missouri 64106.
                                   airplanes
                                   previously
                                   affected by AD
                                   2011-05-02 (76 FR
                                   10220, February
                                   24, 2011): We are
                                   collecting these
                                   inspection
                                   results for 24
                                   months after
                                   March 31, 2011
                                   (the effective
                                   date retained
                                   from AD 2011-05-
                                   02). For
                                   airplanes not
                                   previously
                                   affected by AD
                                   2011-05-02 (76 FR
                                   10220, February
                                   24, 2011): We are
                                   collecting these
                                   inspection
                                   results for 24
                                   months after
                                   October 3, 2011
                                   (the effective
                                   date of this AD).
                                   The reporting
                                   requirements of
                                   this AD are no
                                   longer required
                                   after that time..
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              AD 2011-18-11
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airplane Serial Number:                  ...............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Time-in-Service (TIS) of Airplane:       ...............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airplane Engine Type/Model Number/       ...............................
 Series Number:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TIS of Airplane When Current Engine was  ...............................
 Installed:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date When Current Engine was Installed:  ...............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
STC Number that Installed Current        ...............................
 Engine (if applicable):
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of Tolerance Recording:              ...............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corrective Action Taken:                 ...............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any Additional Information (Optional):   ...............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name:                                    ...............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Telephone and/or Email Address:          ...............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date:                                    ...............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Send report to: Jim Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Figure 1

(g) Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to
the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your Principal
Maintenance Inspector or Principal Avionics Inspector, as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight
Standards District Office.
    (3) AMOCs approved for AD 2011-05-02 (76 FR 10220, February 24,
2011) are approved as AMOCs for this AD.

(i) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact George Duckett,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (516)
794-5531; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) You must use the following service information to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference (IBR) under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 of the
following service information on the date specified:
    (2) Viking DHC-3 Otter Maintenance Manual Temporary Revision No.
18, Viking DHC-3 Otter Maintenance Manual Temporary Revision No. 19,
and Viking DHC-3 Maintenance Manual Temporary Revision No. 20, all
dated December 5, 2008, approved for IBR March 31, 2011 (76 FR
10220, February 24, 2011).
    (3) To get information about the revisions to the maintenance
program identified in this AD, contact Viking Air Ltd., 9574 Hampden
Road, Sidney, BC Canada V8L 5V5; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
Internet: www.vikingair.com.

    (4) You may review copies of the referenced revisions at the
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 19, 2011.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-21876 Filed 8-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16015-16016]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05925]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2022-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2211]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before June 21, 2022.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the
respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-2211, to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email) [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected]; or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at https://www.floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_overview.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location
https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the tables. For communities
with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies can be
identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM date
listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Mineral County, Montana and Incorporated Areas
         Project: 17-08-0393S Preliminary Date: January 15, 2021
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Town of Alberton.......................  Mineral County Courthouse, 300
                                          River Road, Superior, MT
                                          59872.
Town of Superior.......................  Mineral County Courthouse, 300
                                          River Road, Superior, MT
                                          59872.
Unincorporated Areas of Mineral County.  Mineral County Courthouse, 300
                                          River Road, Superior, MT
                                          59872.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2022-05925 Filed 3-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 251 (Tuesday, December 31, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79691-79692]
[FR Doc No: 2013-31349]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0069; FRL-9905-01-OAR]

Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request; The
SunWise Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is planning to submit an
information collection request (ICR) for

``The SunWise Program'' (EPA ICR No. 1904.08, OMB Control No. 2060-
0439) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). Before doing so, EPA is soliciting public comments on
specific aspects of the proposed information collection as described
below. This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently
approved through June 30, 2014. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor
and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before March 3, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-OAR-
2007-0069 online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), by
email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Burchard, Stratospheric
Protection Division, Office of Atmospheric Programs (6205J),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:
(202) 343-2338; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA is soliciting
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of
the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. EPA
will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as appropriate.
The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for review and
approval. At that time, EPA will issue another Federal Register notice
to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to
submit additional comments to OMB.
    Abstract: The SunWise Program is a school and community-based sun
safety education program for children grades K-8. The Program's
objective is to reduce the incidence of, and morbidity and mortality
from skin cancer, cataracts, and other UV-related health effects in the
United States. The following collection of information will be used for
both program material distribution and determining program
effectiveness and participant satisfaction:
     A SunWise Program participant registration form;
     A participating-teacher survey, measuring experience with
the Program;
     A participating-student survey identifying sun safety
knowledge before and after participation in the Program;
     Follow-up phone interviews with teachers who complete the
survey;
     A SunWise Don't Fry Day pledge form;
     Sun Safety Certification Tutorial questions (for community
organizations participating in the SunWise program); and a
     Pretest of a SunWise partner survey
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Elementary and middle school
students and educators, recreation workers, and health educators.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Voluntary.
    Estimated number of respondents: 8,980.
    Frequency of response: Annual.
    Total estimated burden: 1,632 hours per year. Burden is defined at
5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $107,172.45 per year, which includes no
annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in the average annual
burden hours currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR
Burdens.

    Dated: December 18, 2013.
Drusilla Hufford,
Director, Stratospheric Protection Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-31349 Filed 12-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: November 10, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 217)]
[Notices]
[Page 68433-68435]
[DOCID:fr10no05-107]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

November 3, 2005.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings.

    Docket Numbers: ER01-1527-009; ER01-1529-009.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Co.; Sierra Pacific Power Company.
    Description: Nevada Power Co & Sierra Pacific Power Co notifies
FERC of developments constituting a non-material change in status
relating to Applicants' market rate authority.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051102-0117.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1181-001.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits the revisions to the
PJM Amended and Restated Operating Agreement in compliance with FERC's
August 31, 2005 Order.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051101-0013
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1468-001.
    Applicants: Ridge Generating Station Limited Partnership.
    Description: Ridge Generating Station, Limited Partnership submits
supplemental descriptive information re market-based rate schedule and
a streamlined generation market power analysis pertaining to the
Lakeland Electric control area.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051101-0014.
    Comment Date: 5:00 pm Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-74-000.
    Applicants: Commonwealth Edison Company.
    Description: Commonwealth Edison Co submits a notice of
cancellation, as Attachment A, regarding the cancellation of ComEd Rate
Schedule 80.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051101-0021.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-75-000.
    Applicants: NRG McClain LLC.
    Description: NRG McClain LLC submits a notice of cancellation of
its FERC Rate Schedule 1.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051101-0022.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-76-000.
    Applicants: LSP-Nelson Energy LLC.
    Description: LSP-Nelson Energy LLC submits notice canceling LSP-
Nelson's FERC Rate Schedule 1.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051101-0023.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-77-000.
    Applicants: Illinois Municipal Electric Agency.
    Description: The Illinois Municipal Electric Agency submits an
initial Rate Schedule No. 1 & supporting cost data to establish its
annual revenue requirements for providing Reactive Supply & Voltage
Control from Generation Sources etc.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051101-0024.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-78-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits Schedule 9-OPSI, an
amendment to the PJM FERC Electric Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051101-0025.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-79-000.
    Applicants: Styrka Energy Master Fund LLC.
    Description: Stykra Energy Master Fund, LLC files to cancel its
FERC market based rate tariff, Original Rate Schedule No. 1.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051101-0026.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-80-000.
    Applicants: New York State Electric & Gas Corporation.
    Description: New York State Electric & Gas Corp submits a
supplement to Rate Schedule FERC No. 72 Facilities Agreement with the
Municipal Board of the Village of Bath.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051101-0027.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-81-000.
    Applicants: Styrka Energy Fund LLC.
    Description: Stryka Energy Fund LLC submits a cancellation to its
Original Rate Schedule FERC No.1, effective February 24, 2004.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051101-0028.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-82-000.
    Applicants: Wisconsin Public Service Corp.
    Description: Wisconsin Public Service Corp submits its Eighth
Revised Service Agreement No. 9 with Washington Island Electric
Cooperative under FERC Electric Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1,
effective October 1, 2005.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051101-0029.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-83-000.
    Applicants: Exelon Corporation.
    Description: Exelon Corp on behalf of Commonwealth Edison Co
submits notice of cancellation of Original Service Agreement C1059,
FERC Electric Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, effective October 13,
2005.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051101-0030.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-84-000.
    Applicants: Wisconsin Electric Power Company.
    Description: Wisconsin Electric Power Co's submits a Notice of
Cancellation of its FERC Electric Tariff, Rate Schedule No. 84,
effective January 1, 2006.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051101-0032.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-85-000.
    Applicants: Vermont Electric Power Company, Inc.
    Description: Vermont Electric Power Co submits revisions to the
VELCO 1991 Transmission Agreement, effective January 1, 2006.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051101-0031.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-86-000.
    Applicants: New York State Electric & Gas Corporation.
    Description: New York State Electric & Gas Corp submits supplement
to Rate Schedule FERC No. 117-Facilities Agreement with Delaware County
Electric Cooperative, etc.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051101-0010.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-87-000.
    Applicants: Styrka Energy Fund Ltd.
    Description: Styrka Energy Fund Ltd files to cancel its FERC market
based rate tariff, Original Rate Schedule FERC No. 1, and requests
waiver of any obligation to file the quarterly report for the quarter
ending December 2005.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051101-0011.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-88-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Electric Company.
    Description: El Paso Electric Co submits notice of cancellation & a
cancellation tariff sheet for the purpose of canceling a Transaction
Agreement with Southwestern Public Service Co.

    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051101-0012.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-96-000.
    Applicants: American Electric Power Service Corporation.
    Description: AEP on behalf of Southwestern Electric Power Co
submits the executed Second Power Supply Agreement with East Texas
Electric Coop, Inc et al.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051102-0367.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER99-830-013; ER04-925-005.
    Applicants: Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc.; Merrill Lynch
Commodities, Inc.
    Description: Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc & Merrill Lynch Capital
Services, Inc reports the change in status in connection with the
transfer of equity interests in Granite Ridge I SPE, LLC etc.
    Filed Date: October 28, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051101-0015.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2005.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other and the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov.
 To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet

access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-6179 Filed 11-9-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 215 (Monday, November 7, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 78083-78084]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26807]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-9345; Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-028-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; United Instruments, Inc. Series
Altimeters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain United Instruments, Inc. 5934 series altimeters that were
manufactured between January 2015 and February 2016 and installed in
airplanes and helicopters. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of
certain altimeters displaying higher than actual altitude due to a slow
diaphragm leak. This proposed AD would require replacing the affected
altimeters. We are issuing this proposed AD to prevent display of
misleading altitude data, which could result in inadvertent flight into
terrain.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 22,
2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
United Instruments, Inc., 3625 Comotara Avenue, Wichita, KS 67226;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: www.unitedinst.com. You may
review this referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9345; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Les Lyne, Aerospace Engineer, Wichita
Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Wichita,
Kansas 67209; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-9345;
Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-028-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We received a report that certain United Instruments, Inc. 5934
series altimeters that were manufactured between January 2015 and
February 2016 may display higher than actual altitude. These altimeters
are susceptible to developing a slow diaphragm leak, which would affect
the accuracy of the altimeters. It has been determined that
insufficient removal of chemical substance on the diaphragm assembly
during the production process of the altimeter caused the misleading
display of altitude data. This condition, if not corrected, could
result in display of misleading altitude data, which could result in
inadvertent flight into terrain.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed United Instruments, Inc. Service Bulletin No. 13, dated
March 25, 2016. The service bulletin describes procedures for replacing
the nonconforming altimeters. This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 1,351 altimeters as
installed in airplanes and helicopters of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per        Cost on U.S.
               Action                      Labor cost           Parts cost        product          operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replace altimeter..................  1 work-hour x $85 per           $1,600           $1,685         $2,276,435
                                      hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this proposed
AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

United Instruments, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2016-9345; Directorate
Identifier 2016-CE-028-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by December 12, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to United Instruments, Inc. 5934 series
altimeters that were manufactured between January 2015 and February
2016 and installed in airplanes and helicopters.
    (1) The specific affected serial number altimeters can be found
in United Instruments, Inc. Service Bulletin No. 13, dated March 25,
2016, which can be found on the Internet at http://www.unitedinst.com/ServiceBulletinNo13/.
    (2) Altimeters that have been corrected by United Instruments,
Inc. following Service Bulletin No. 13, dated March 25, 2016, are
not affected by this AD and no further action is necessary.
    (3) Altimeters that have been corrected by United Instruments,
Inc. can be identified by a yellow dot, approximately \1/4\ inch (6
mm) in diameter, located approximately 1 inch (25 mm) to the left
side of the nameplate. The corrected altimeters will also have a
letter ``M,'' approximately \1/8\ inch (3mm) high, metal stamped on
the nameplate after the name ``ALTIMETER.''

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 44, Cabin Systems.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of certain altimeters displaying
higher than actual altitude due to a slow diaphragm leak. This AD
requires replacing the affected altimeters. We are issuing this AD
to prevent display of misleading altitude data, which could result
in inadvertent flight into terrain.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Replacement

    Within the next 12 months after the effective date of this AD,
replace any affected altimeter with a serviceable part following
United Instruments, Inc. Service Bulletin No. 13, dated March 25,
2016.

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(i) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Les Lyne,
Aerospace Engineer, Wichita ACO, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100,
Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (316) 946-
4107; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
United Instruments, Inc., 3625 Comotara Avenue, Wichita, KS 67226;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: www.unitedinst.com. You
may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329-4148.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on November 1, 2016.
Pat Mullen,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-26807 Filed 11-4-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 43 (Wednesday, March 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12538-12540]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04796]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-71627; File No. SR-OCC-2014-01]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation;
Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Concerning Amendments to the
Charters for the Membership/Risk Committee, Audit Committee and
Performance Committee of OCC's Board of Directors

February 27, 2014.

I. Introduction

    On January 2, 2014, The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change SR-OCC-2014-01 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\2\ The proposed rule change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on January 22, 2014.\3\ The Commission received no
comment letters. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is
granting approval of the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71311 (January 15,
2014), 79 FR 3653 (January 22, 2014).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description

    Pursuant to the proposed rule change, as approved, OCC is amending
its charters for the Membership/Risk Committee (``MRC Charter''), Audit
Committee (``AC Charter'') and Performance Committee (``PC Charter'')
(collectively, ``Committee Charters'') of OCC's Board of Directors
(``Board'').

Changes Common to the MRC, AC, and PC

    OCC is amending the Committee Charters \4\ to more clearly set
forth certain uniform administrative functions to provide that: (i)
Each committee chair is responsible for ensuring that important issues
discussed at committee meetings are reported timely to the Board; (ii)
each committee chair shall determine if minutes of executive sessions
are to be maintained, taking into consideration the sensitivity of the
matters discussed and the possibility that candor might be limited if
minutes are maintained; (iii) each committee confirm annually that all
responsibilities outlined in its Committee Charter have been carried
out; and (iv) each committee evaluate its performance, and the
performance of its individual members, on a regular basis and provide
results of such assessment to the Governance Committee (``GC'') for
review. As described in more detail below, OCC is also amending the
Committee Charters to reflect certain changes specific to the charters
of MRC, AC, and PC, respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The original versions of the Committee Charters were
approved on December 6, 2013. See Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 71022 (December 6, 2013), 78 FR 75659 (December 12, 2013) [File
No. SR-OCC-2013-17].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Specific to the Committee

Membership/Risk Committee
    Section I of the MRC Charter states, in relevant part, that the
Board established the MRC to assist the Board in overseeing OCC's
policies and processes for identifying and addressing strategic,
operational, and financial risks. OCC is amending the MRC Charter to
more clearly provide for the MRC's oversight of the Chief Risk Officer
(``CRO'') activities by requiring that the MRC: (i) Meet at least
annually with the CRO and other corporate officers deemed appropriate
in separate executive sessions; (ii) decide whether to approve
management's recommendation to appoint or replace the CRO; (iii) assess
the performance of the CRO and the Enterprise Risk Management (``ERM'')
Department; (iv) oversee the structure, staffing and resources of the
ERM Department; (v) decide whether to approve any CRO annual
compensation or salary adjustments, but delegate to the MRC Chair the
ability to modify the approved amount as a result of the MRC Chair's
participation in the annual meeting of the PC; (vi) review and
recommend OCC's ``Risk Appetite Statement'' \5\ for annual Board
approval; and (vii) review and monitor OCC's risk profile for
consistency with OCC's ``Risk Appetite Statement.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The ``Risk Appetite Statement'' sets the standards on which
all of OCC's risk identification, measurement, monitoring, and
testing are based. OCC believes that the OCC's Risk Appetite
Statement is a key component of its enterprise risk management
program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Audit Committee
    Section I of the AC Charter states, in relevant part, that the
Board established an AC to assist the Board in overseeing OCC's
financial reporting process, OCC's system of internal control, and
OCC's auditing, accounting, and compliance processes. OCC is amending
the AC Charter to more clearly provide that the AC: (i) Monitor and
evaluate the independent accountant's qualifications, performance, and
independence and, based upon such evaluations, recommend the
independent accountant's appointment or dismissal; \6\ (ii) resolve any
disagreements between management and the independent accountant
regarding financial reporting; and (iii) review reports obtained from
and prepared by the independent accountant to evaluate the independent
accountant's qualifications, performance, and independence.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ OCC believes that this change will align with best practices
and reflect the AC's oversight of the external auditor to better
assure independence in connection with the performance of the
external auditors' function and services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OCC is also amending the AC Charter to clarify the committee's
duties and responsibilities with respect to OCC's Internal Audit
Department by requiring that the AC: (i) Review and approve the
Internal Audit Department Charter to ensure that there are no
unjustified scope restrictions or limitations placed on the Internal
Audit Department; (ii) decide whether to approve management's
recommendation to appoint or replace the Chief Audit Executive
(``CAE''); (iii) review the Internal Audit Department process for
establishing the risk-based annual internal audit plan and monitor
progress against the plan; (iv) review reports and other communications
prepared by the Internal Audit Department and inquire of management
regarding steps taken to deal with items raised; (v) assess the
performance of the CAE and Internal Audit Department; (vi) decide
whether to approve the CAE's annual compensation, but delegate to the
AC Chair the ability to modify the approved amount as a result of the
MRC Chair's participation in the annual meeting of the PC; and (vii)
oversee the structure, staffing and resources of the Internal Audit
Department.
    In addition, OCC is amending the AC Charter to provide that the
Internal Audit Department may utilize co-sourcing service providers.\7\
Specifically, the amended rule change, as approved, allows the AC to
delegate authority to the CAE to: (i) Hire internal audit co-sourcing
service providers, on an as needed basis, to review particular areas of
OCC, augment resources available within the Internal Audit Department,
or for any other practical purpose; (ii) review the performance of the
internal audit co-sourcing service providers; (iii) exercise final
approval on the appointment, retention, or discharge of the audit firm;
and (iv) approve the scope of services to be performed by the internal
audit-co sourcing service provider.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Co-sourcing service providers are consultants hired on a
temporary basis to assist with a particular project when OCC's
Internal Audit Department staff is otherwise fully engaged and
requires additional resources or skill sets to complete a project on
a timely basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, OCC is amending the AC Charter to provide that the AC will
meet at least annually with management, the Chief Compliance Officer,
the CAE, and the independent accountants, in separate executive
sessions, to discuss any matters that either side believes warrants
private discussion.
Performance Committee
    OCC is amending the PC Charter to require, among other things,
that: (i) The PC Chair meet at least annually in private session with
the GC Chair to discuss the performance of key officers; (ii) the PC
meet at least annually with the Chief Executive Officer and any other
corporate officers deemed appropriate by the PC to discuss and review
key officers' performance and compensation levels; (iii) the PC meet
annually to determine compensation levels of key officers; \8\ (iv) the
PC Chair recuse himself from discussion of his individual compensation,
benefits, or perquisites, except as otherwise requested by the other
members of the Committee; and (v) the functions and responsibilities of
the PC be amended to also include review performance and compensation
of key employees, to

appoint and remove members of the Administrative Committee and to
oversee the Administrative Committee, confirm annually that all charter
responsibilities have been carried out, and to evaluate the committee's
and PC members' performance on a regular basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The AC and MRC Chairs shall be invited to attend such
meeting to discuss the performance of the CAE and CRO, respectively,
and to advise on the compensation levels approved for such officers
as provided for in each Committee's Charter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion

    Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act \9\ directs the Commission to
approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it
finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements
of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such
organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \10\ requires that the
rules of a clearing agency that is registered with the Commission be
designed to, among other things, protect investors and the public
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \11\ because the amendments to the
Committee Charters should clarify the role and responsibilities of each
of the Committees within OCC's governance structure. Furthermore,
consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(d)(8) \12\ under the Act, the amendments
to the Committee Charters should help ensure that OCC has governance
arrangements that are clear and transparent, support the objectives of
OCC's owners and participants, and promote the effectiveness of OCC's
risk management procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Id.
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(d)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in
particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \13\ and the
rules and regulations thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\14\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-OCC-2014-01) be and
hereby is approved.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \15\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

    For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary .
[FR Doc. 2014-04796 Filed 3-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


47798 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2002 / Notices go directly to the Home Page for the Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) at http:// www. epa. gov/ pesticides/ cumulative. 2. In person. The Agency has established an official record for this action under docket ID number OPP– 2002– 0154. The official record consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received during an applicable comment period, and other information related to this action, including any information claimed as Confidential Business Information (CBI). This official record includes the documents that are physically located in the docket, as well as the documents that are referenced in those documents. The public version of the official record does not include any information claimed as CBI. The public version of the official record, which includes printed, paper versions of any electronic comments submitted during an applicable comment period, is available for inspection in the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA, from 8: 30 a. m. to 4 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The PIRIB telephone number is (703) 305 5805.

C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments? As described in Unit III. of the notice published in the Federal Register of June 20, 2002 (67 FR 41993) (FRL– 7183– 1), you may submit your comments through the mail, in person, or electronically. Please follow the instructions that are provided in that notice. Do not submit any information electronically that you consider to be CBI. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify docket ID number OPP– 2002– 0154 in the subject line on the first page of your response.

D. How Should I Handle CBI that I Want to Submit to the Agency? Do not submit any information electronically that you consider to be CBI. You may claim information that you submit to EPA in response to this document as CBI by marking any part or all of that information as CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes any information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public version of the official record. Information not marked confidential will be included in the public version of the official record without prior notice. If you have any questions about CBI or the procedures for claiming CBI, please consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

E. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your comments: 1. Explain your views as clearly as possible. 2. Describe any assumptions that you used. 3. Provide copies of any technical information and/ or data you used that support your views. 4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you arrived at the estimate that you provide. 5. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns. 6. Offer alternative ways to improve the notice. 7. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline in this notice. 8. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal Register citation.

II. Background EPA is extending the comment period for the revised OP cumulative risk assessment, which was released to the public for comment in the Federal Register of June 20, 2002 (67 FR 41993) (FRL– 7183– 1). The documents provide information on the revisions that were made to the preliminary OP cumulative risk assessment, which was released to the public in the Federal Register of December 28, 2001 (66 FR 67249) (FRL– 6816– 5).

List of Subjects Environmental protection, Chemicals, Pesticides and pests.

Dated: July 17, 2002.

Lois Ann Rossi,

Director, Special Review and Reregistration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 02– 18582 Filed 7– 18– 02; 1: 33 pm]

BILLING CODE 6560– 50– S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL– 7249– 2]

Announcement of Public Comment Period for Draft Contaminated Sediments Science Plan AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has developed and requests public comment on the draft Contaminated Sediments Science Plan. The Contaminated Sediments Science Plan is available electronically at http:// www. epa. gov/ superfund/ action/ guidance/ cssp. pdf and http:// www. epa. gov/ superfund/ action/ guidance/ cssp appendix. pdf. This science plan is a mechanism for the EPA to develop and coordinate Agency wide science activities in the contaminated sediments area. Along with the EPA's contaminated sediments science activities database, this plan provides an analysis of the current Agency science activities in this area, identifies and evaluates the science gaps, and provides a strategy for filling those gaps. Implementation of the science recommendations will be contingent upon overall Agency priorities and resources available within the annual budgetary planning cycle. Four questions for which the EPA is particularly seeking public comment are provided below in the section Issues for Public Comment. The information submitted in response to this notice will be considered by the EPA in the completion of the final document. DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 20, 2002. ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/ courier. Follow the detailed instructions provided in section I. B. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact the RCRA/ Superfund Call Center at (800) 424– 9346; from the Washington, DC, metropolitan area call (703) 412– 9810. The Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) number is (800) 553– 7672; from the Washington, DC, metropolitan area the number is (703) 412– 3323. For technical inquiries, you may contact Lee Hofmann, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Mail Code 5103T, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460 at telephone VerDate Jun< 13> 2002 23: 21 Jul 19, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 22JYN1. SGM pfrm17 PsN: 22JYN1 47799 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2002 / Notices number 202– 566– 1928, or by email hofmann. lee@ epa. gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information A. How Can I Get Copies of This Document and Other Related Information? 1. Docket: The EPA has established an official public docket for this action under Docket ID No. SFUND– 2002– 0004. The official public docket is the collection of materials that is available for public viewing at EPA, Superfund Docket located at 1235 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia. This Docket Facility is open from 9: 00 a. m. to 4: 00 p. m. EST, Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket telephone number is (703) 603– 9232. 2. Electronic Access. You may access this Federal Register notice or document electronically through the EPA Internet under the `` Federal Register'' listings at http:// www. epa. gov/ fedrgstr/. An electronic version of the public docket is available through the EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may use the EPA Dockets at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket/ to submit or view public comments, to access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select `` search, '' then key in the appropriate docket identification number. Certain types of information will not be placed in the EPA Dockets. Information claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute, which is not included in the official public docket, will not be available for public viewing in the EPA's electronic public docket. The EPA's policy is that copyrighted material will not be placed in the EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in printed, paper form in the official public docket. Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facility identified in section I. B. For public commenters, it is important to note that the EPA's policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public viewing in the EPA's electronic public docket as the EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. When the EPA identifies a comment containing copyrighted material, the EPA will provide a reference to that material in the version of the comment that is placed in the EPA's electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket. Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be transferred to the EPA's electronic public docket. Public comments that are mailed or delivered to the Docket will be scanned and placed in the EPA's electronic public docket. Where practical, physical objects will be photographed, and the photograph will be placed in the EPA's electronic public docket along with a brief description written by the docket staff. For additional information about the EPA's electronic public docket visit EPA Dockets online or see 67 FR 38102, May 31, 2002.

B. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments? You may submit comments electronically, by mail, by facsimile, or through hand delivery/ courier. To ensure proper receipt by the EPA, identify the appropriate docket identification number in the subject line on the first page of your comment. Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. You may submit comments until 60 days from the date of this document. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked `` late. '' The EPA is not required to consider these late comments. 1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as prescribed below, the EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing address, and an e mail address or other contact information in the body of your comment. Also include this contact information on the outside of any disk or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying the disk or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the submitter of the comment and allows the EPA to contact you in case the EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further information on the substance of your comment. The EPA's policy is that the EPA will not edit your comment, and any identifying or contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made available in the EPA's electronic public docket. If the EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, the EPA may not be able to consider your comment. i. EPA Dockets. Your use of the EPA's electronic public docket to submit comments to the EPA electronically is the EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket, and follow the online instructions for submitting comments. To access the EPA's electronic public docket from the EPA Internet Home Page, select `` Information Sources, Dockets, '' and `` EPA Dockets. '' Once in the system, select `` search, '' and then key in Docket ID No. SFUND– 2002– 0004. The system is an `` anonymous access'' system, which means the EPA will not know your identity, e mail address, or other contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. ii. E mail. Comments may be sent by electronic mail (e mail) to Superfund. docket@ epa. gov, Attention Docket ID No. SFUND– 2002– 0004. In contrast to the EPA's electronic public docket, the EPA's e mail system is not an `` anonymous access'' system. If you send an e mail comment directly to the Docket without going through the EPA's electronic public docket, the EPA's email system automatically captures your e mail address. E mail addresses that are automatically captured by the EPA's email system are included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made available in the EPA's electronic public docket. iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM that you mail to the mailing address identified in section I. B. 2. These electronic submissions will be accepted in WordPerfect or ASCII file format. Avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption. 2. By Mail. Send an original and three copies of your comments and enclosures (including references) to: EPA, Superfund Docket Contaminated Sediments Science Plan, Mail Code 5202G, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20460, Attention Docket ID No. SFUND– 2002– 0004. If you want receipt of your comments acknowledged, you must include a selfaddressed stamped envelope. 3. By Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver an original and three copies of your comments and enclosures (including references) to: Superfund Docket, 1235 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia, Attention Docket ID No. SFUND– 2002– 0004. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation as identified in Unit I. A. 1.

VerDate Jun< 13> 2002 23: 21 Jul 19, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 22JYN1. SGM pfrm17 PsN: 22JYN1 47800 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2002 / Notices 4. By Facsimile. Fax your comments to: (703) 603– 9240, Attention Docket ID. No. SFUND– 2002– 0004.

II. Purpose of the Science Plan This Contaminated Sediments Science Plan is a mechanism for the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop and coordinate Agency wide science activities in the contaminated sediments area. Along with the EPA's contaminated sediments science activities database, this plan provides an analysis of the current Agency science activities in this area, identifies and evaluates the science gaps, and provides a strategy for filling these gaps. The Contaminated Sediments Science Plan has three goals to promote the vision of providing a strong scientific basis for addressing contaminated sediments: (1) To develop and disseminate the tools and science necessary to address the management of contaminated sediments; (2) To enhance the level of coordination and communication of science activities dealing with contaminated sediments across the Agency Program and Regional Offices and the Office of Research and Development; and (3) To develop an effective, cost efficient strategy to promote these scientific activities and research.

III. Description of Science Plan The draft document has four chapters. Chapter 1 discusses the goals and objectives and how the Science Plan relates to the Agency's mandate. Chapter 2 provides an overview of the contaminated sediments work across the Agency. These issue summaries provide the overall context for the discussion of the specific research and science needs given in the rest of the Science Plan. Chapter 3, along with the EPA's contaminated sediments science activities database (Appendix A), is the data collection and analysis section of the Science Plan. It documents the current contaminated sediment science activities ongoing within the Agency and places these activities within the context of Agency goals. These activities are sediment site characterization, exposure assessment, human health and ecological risk assessment, risk communication, sediment remediation, baseline and post remediation monitoring and information management and exchange activities. Significant data gaps and uncertainties in methodology/ assessment procedures are identified. Finally, it proposes research and science activities to fill those data gaps and resolve related issues. Chapter 4 provides the key recommendations for future Agency science activities, including research, based upon the discussion in Chapter 3. For each recommendation, critical EPA partners, and the immediate or longterm nature of the science activity are proposed. An internal mechanism for implementing the science recommendations is proposed. Implementation of the science recommendations will be contingent upon overall Agency priorities and resources available within the annual budgetary planning cycle. Issues for Public Comment: The EPA solicits comments on all aspects of the draft science plan. In particular, the EPA requests comments and information on the following questions: (1) The Contaminated Sediments Science Plan (Science Plan) is the first official Agency science plan of its kind designed to address a significant crossagency environmental issue in a systematic and integrated fashion. Does the Science Plan adequately convey the need for such a strategic planning document, i. e., are the goals and objectives of the plan understandable and appropriate to the subject? (2) Are the major areas of contaminated sediments science (sediment site characterization, exposure assessment, human health effects and risk assessment, ecological effects and risk assessment, sediment remediation, baseline and post remediation monitoring, risk communication, and information management and exchange activities) appropriately addressed? Are any major areas missing? (3) Are the key recommendations clearly defined and appropriate to resolve the science needs discussed in Chapter 3? (4) Are there other issues or key recommendations which should be considered in this Science Plan?

Dated: July 12, 2002. Marianne Lamont Horinko, Assistant Administrator, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. [FR Doc. 02– 18406 Filed 7– 19– 02; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560– 50– P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL– 7248– 8]

Valley Chemical Superfund Site/ Greenville, MS; Notice of Proposed Settlement AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement.

SUMMARY: Under section 122( h)( 1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed to settle claims for response costs at the Valley Chemical Superfund Site (Site) located in Greenville, Mississippi, with Carl A. Bauer. EPA will consider public comments on the proposed settlement for thirty days. EPA may withdraw from or modify the proposed settlement should such comments disclose facts or considerations which indicate the proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. Copies of the proposed settlement are available from: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, CERCLA Program Services Branch, Waste Management Division, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303, (404) 562– 8887. Written comment may be submitted to Mr. Greg Armstrong at the above address within 30 days of the date of publication.

Dated: June 26,2002. James T. Miller, Acting Chief, CERCLA Program Services Branch, Waste Management Division. [FR Doc. 02– 18407 Filed 7– 19– 02; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560– 50– P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION [CC Docket No. 96– 45; DA 02– 1466]

Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks Comment on Smith Bagley, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier for the Navajo Reservation in Utah AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice; solicitation of comments.

SUMMARY: In a Public Notice in this proceeding released on June 21, 2002, the Wireline Competition Bureau sought comment on Smith Bagley's petition seeking designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier to receive Federal universal service support for the provision of service on the Navajo Reservation in Utah.

DATES: Comments are due on or before August 21, 2002. Reply comments are due on or before September 5, 2002.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. See Supplementary Information section for where and how to file comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anita Cheng, Assistant Division Chief,

VerDate Jun< 13> 2002 23: 21 Jul 19, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 22JYN1. SGM pfrm17 PsN: 22JYN1