[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 75 (Thursday, April 18, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23135-23137]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09057]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2013-0095]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Blue Water Resort & Casino West Coast Nationals;
Parker, AZ

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone within
the Lake Moovalya region of the navigable waters of the Colorado River
in Parker, Arizona for the Blue Water Resort & Casino West Coast
Nationals. This temporary safety zone is necessary to provide for the
safety of the participants, crew, spectators, and participating
vessels. Persons and vessels are prohibited from entering into,
transiting through, or anchoring within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m. on April 20, 2013, until 6
p.m. on April 21, 2013. It will be enforced from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. daily
on April 20 and 21, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2013-0095. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Petty Officer Bryan Gollogly, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego; Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

A. Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this final rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because delay would be impracticable. The
Coast Guard did not receive necessary information from the event
sponsor in time to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking. The event
is scheduled to take place, and as such, immediate action is necessary
to ensure the safety of vessels, spectators, participants, and others
in the vicinity of the marine event on the dates and times this rule
will be in effect.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), for the same reasons mentioned above, the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective
less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying
the effective date would be impracticable and contrary to the public
interest, since immediate action is needed to ensure public safety.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for this temporary rule is the Ports and Waterways
Safety Act, which authorizes the Coast Guard to establish safety zones
(33 U.S.C. sections 1221 et seq.).
    RPM Racing Enterprises is sponsoring the Blue Water Resort & Casino
West Coast Nationals, which is held in Parker, Arizona. This temporary
safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the participants,
crew, spectators, sponsor vessels, and other vessels and users of the
waterway. This event involves powerboats racing along a closed course.
The size of the boats varies from eight to sixteen feet in length.
Approximately 100 boats will be participating in this event. The
sponsor will provide two patrol and two rescue boats to help facilitate
the event and ensure public safety.

C. Discussion of Rule

    The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone that will be enforced
from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on April 20, 2013, and April 21, 2013. This
safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the crews,
spectators, participants, and other vessels and users of the waterway.
Persons and vessels will be prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or anchoring with this safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, or his designated representative. This temporary
safety zone includes the waters of the Colorado River between Headgate
Dam and 0.5 miles north of the Blue Water Marina in Parker, Arizona.
Before the effective period, the Coast Guard will publish a Local
Notice to Mariners (LNM).

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or under section 1 of
Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under those Orders.
    We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. This determination is based
on the size, timeframe, and location of the safety zone. Commercial
vessels will not be hindered by the safety zone. Recreational vessels
may transit through the established safety zone during the specified
times if they obtain authorization from the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in the impacted portion of the Colorado River from 6
a.m. to 6 p.m. on April 20, 2013, and April 21, 2013.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
safety zone will only be enforced for two twelve-hour periods. Although
the safety zone will apply to the entire width of the river, traffic
will be allowed to pass through the zone with the permission of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his designated representative.
Before the effective period, the Coast Guard will publish a Local
Notice to Mariners (LNM).

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction.

    An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T11-547 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T11-547  Safety zone; Blue Water Resort & Casino West Coast
Nationals, Parker, AZ.

    (a) Location. This temporary safety zone includes the waters of the
Colorado River between Headgate Dam and 0.5 miles north of the Blue
Water Marina in Parker, Arizona.
    (b) Enforcement Period. This section will be in enforced from 6
a.m. to 6 p.m. on April 20, and 21, 2013. Before the effective period,
the Coast Guard will publish a Local Notice to Mariners (LNM). If the
event concludes prior to the scheduled termination time, the Coast
Guard will cease enforcement of this safety zone and will announce that
fact via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
    (c) Definitions. The following definition applies to this section:
designated representative means any commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
and local, state, and federal law enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
    (d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit through or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port of San Diego or his designated representative.
    (2) Mariners requesting permission to transit through the safety
zone may request authorization to do so from the Patrol Commander. The
Patrol Commander may be contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16.
    (3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his designated representative.
    (4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by
siren, radio, a flashing light, or other means, the operator of a
vessel shall proceed as directed.
    (5) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other federal, state, or
local agencies.

    Dated: March 20, 2013.
S.M. Mahoney,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2013-09057 Filed 4-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 82 (Friday, April 30, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22971-22972]
[FR Doc No: 2021-09098]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2021-0189]

Cooperative Research and Development Agreement--Tactical Mobile
Technology Architecture; Correction

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard published a document in the Federal Register
on April 27, 2021, concerning a notice of intent; request for comments
on a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement--Tactical Mobile
Technology Architecture. The document contained an incorrect company
name for who we are currently considering partnering with on the
research and development.

DATES: This correction is effective April 30, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about this document
call or email, Mr. David Cote, Project Official, IT and Networks
Branch, U.S. Coast Guard Research and Development Center, telephone
860-271-2693, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of April 27, 2021, in FR Doc. 2021-08666,
on page 22217, in the third column, the company name ``IMPRESS
Technologies Inc.'' is corrected to read ``IMPRES Technology Solutions
Inc.''. The company name was misspelled in the original publication of
the notice of intent.

    Dated: April 27, 2021.
M.T. Cunningham,
Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2021-09098 Filed 4-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: April 5, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 65)]
[Notices]
[Page 16776-16777]
[DOCID:fr05ap07-59]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-614-002]

Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC; Notice of Motion To Place
Settlement Rates Into Effect

March 30, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 23, 2007, Transwestern Pipeline Company,
LLC (Transwestern) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to be
effective April 1, 2007:

Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 5
Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 5A
Second Revised Sheet No. 5A.01
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 5A.02
Substitute Fifth Revised Sheet No. 5B

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 5C
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 5D
Substitute Original Sheet No. 5D.01
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 5E

    Transwestern states that the purpose of this filing is to move into
effect settlement rates contained in a settlement filed on March 9,
2007.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a
protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons

unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 6, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-6329 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 14, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 52683]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24538]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R01-OAR-2017-0266; FRL-9970-63-Region 1]

Air Plan Approval; NH; Approval of Recordkeeping and Reporting
Requirements and Single Source Order

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the
State of New Hampshire. The revisions establish recordkeeping and
reporting obligations for sources of air pollution. Additionally, we
are proposing approval of an order limiting emissions of volatile
organic compounds from a facility in the state. This action is being
taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before December 14,
2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01-
OAR-2017-0266 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob McConnell, Environmental Engineer,
Air Quality Planning Unit, Air Programs Branch (Mail Code OEP05-02),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, 5 Post Office Square,
Suite 100, Boston, Massachusetts, 02109-3912;<PHONE_NUMBER>;
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules Section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittals as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views them as
noncontroversial submittals and anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this action
rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse
comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public
comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on
this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any
parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this
time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule which is
located in the Rules Section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: October 26, 2017.
Deborah A. Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. 2017-24538 Filed 11-13-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36529-36530]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14881]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-4657-001]

Apple Group LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Apple Group LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is July 5, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the

above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: June 13, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-14881 Filed 6-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


From:
"Jones, DonnaLee"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent:
Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:13:30
To:
"Ford; Luke"<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc:
Acheson, Seth<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Mcginn, Kevin<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Shappley, Ned<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Raymond, Gabrielle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Orlin, David<EMAIL_ADDRESS>French, Chuck<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:
RE: CAA section 114 request for Coke Ovens RTR - email for Cokenergy
Dear Mr. Ford  -  Thank you for your detailed letter discussing the issues with the Coke 2022 114 information request (Enclosure 1) and test request (Enclosure 2) for your main stack. I will need to discuss the details raised in your letter with my colleagues next week before responding to the specific testing problems. However, in the future, we will send letters directly to Cokenergy and not Prime Energy. Thank you for pointing out this error. My apologies to Prime Energy.

However, in regard to the specific point made in the letter that "Cokenergy does not generate hazardous air pollutants ("HAP") as part of its operations at its facility in East Chicago, Indiana" please refer to the test results attached from the main stack at SunCoke's Middleton facility, specifically, Tables 4-7, 4-8, and 4-9.  These tables show that there are HAP emitted from the main stack. Since SunCoke operates the coke ovens at both Middleton and East Chicago, as pointed out in your letter, we don't expect there to be zero HAP emitted from the main stack at East Chicago while measurable HAP is emitted from the main stack at Middleton. Therefore, we fully expect the testing at Cokenergy to be performed, as requested by the EPA in the Clean Air Act section 114 request.

I will get back to you next week with responses to the other points raised in your letter.

Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711
Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

Pronouns - She/Her/Hers
Salutation - Dr./Ms.

<<CE_114_Request_092322_Final_Signed.pdf>>
<<SunCoke ICR Test Report rev 1 20171119.pdf>>

From: Ford, Luke<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Friday, September 23, 2022 4:57 PM
To: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc: Acheson, Seth<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: RE: CAA section 114 request for Coke Ovens RTR - email for Cokenergy

Dear Dr. Jones:

Per the Schedule for Submissions, see the attached letter detailing our stack testing problems identified in Enclosure 2.

Please let me know if there are questions or if you would like to schedule a meeting to talk through the issues identified.

Thanks very much.

Regards,

Luke E. Ford
Director EH&S
Primary Energy
3210 Watling St.
MC 2-991
East Chicago, IN 46312

Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Office<PHONE_NUMBER>
Mobile<PHONE_NUMBER>

From: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 3:24 PM
To: Klefeker, Mo<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>>
Cc: Ford, Luke<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>>; Acheson, Seth<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>>; STUCKEY, MATT<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>>; Mooney, John<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>>; French, Chuck<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>>; Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: CAA section 114 request for Coke Ovens RTR - email for Cokenergy

Hello Mr. Klefeker:

I hope this email finds you well. Attached you'll find a Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 114 information request letter signed on July 26, 2022, that requests information from Cokenergy heat recovery facility in East Chicago, IN. Please read the letter carefully and respond to this email acknowledging your receipt of the letter. Along with the letter I have attached the following files:

-- Enclosures 1&2 as PDF files
-- Enclosures #3 through #9 as a combined PDF file (these are standard enclosures we include with all section 114 information requests)
-- 1 Excel file to use to submit data to Enclosure 1
--1 Excel file to use to submit data to Enclosure 2

Please let me know if you have any questions about this request.

Thank you in advance for your efforts on this CAA section 114 request.

Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711
Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

Pronouns - She/Her/Hers
Salutation - Dr./Ms.


[Federal Register: July 21, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 138)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 35780-35782]
[DOCID:fr21jy09-6]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0644; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-059-AD;
Amendment 39-15972; AD 2009-15-09]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A380-841, -842, and -861
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    During inspections in production and on in-service aircraft, a
number of Overheat Detection System (OHDS) installation non-
conformities have been identified along the bleed air ducting.
    Some installation issues which may lead to a degraded leak
detection capability have been reported. In case of hot air leakage,
the potential degradation of the OHDS would not allow preventing
damages to structure or components * * *.
* * * * *
    Nonconforming installation or a failure of the OHDS could allow
undetected leakage of bleed air from the hot engine/auxiliary power
unit causing damage to the airplane structure and various airplane
components and systems. This AD requires actions that are intended to
address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: This AD becomes effective August 5, 2009.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication, listed in the AD as of August 5,
2009.
    We must receive comments on this AD by August 20, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1175; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2009-0066, dated March 19, 2009 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    During inspections in production and on in-service aircraft, a
number of Overheat Detection System (OHDS) installation non-
conformities have been identified along the bleed air ducting.
    Some installation issues which may lead to a degraded leak
detection capability have been reported. In case of hot air leakage,
the potential degradation of the OHDS would not allow preventing
damages to structure or components, and therefore could lead to an
unsafe condition.
    To ensure that in-service aircraft are free of such non-
conformities, this AD requires an inspection of the OHDS
installation along the bleed air ducting and, in case of findings
[any sensing element or insulation muff installed incorrectly], to
bring back the installation into the compliant configuration.

Nonconforming installation or a failure of the OHDS could allow
undetected leakage of bleed air from the hot engine/auxiliary power
unit causing damage to the airplane structure and various airplane
components and systems. The inspection of the OHDS installation, for
certain airplanes, consists of inspecting the APU overheat sensing
elements APU 1 Loop A and B, the APU overheat sensing elements APU 2
Loop A and B, the crossbleed overheat sensing element, the forward
cargo compartment heating element, and the sensing element of the
overheat detection unit of the wing. For certain other airplanes,
inspecting the OHDS installation consists of inspecting the forward
cargo compartment heating element. You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A380-36-8004, dated February 13,
2009. The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined the unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
    There are no products of this type currently registered in the
United States. However, this rule is necessary to ensure that the
described unsafe condition is addressed if any of these

products are placed on the U.S. Register in the future.

Differences Between the AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the AD.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    Since there are currently no domestic operators of this product,
notice and opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are
unnecessary.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0644; Directorate
Identifier 2009-NM-059-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2009-15-09 Airbus: Amendment 39-15972. Docket No. FAA-2009-0644;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-059-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August
5, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A380-841, -842, and -861
airplanes, certificated in any category, serial numbers 3, 5, 6, 8,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 20, and 22.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 36:
Pneumatic.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continued airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    During inspections in production and on in-service aircraft, a
number of Overheat Detection System (OHDS) installation non-
conformities have been identified along the bleed air ducting.
    Some installation issues which may lead to a degraded leak
detection capability have been reported. In case of hot air leakage,
the potential degradation of the OHDS would not allow preventing
damages to structure or components, and therefore could lead to an
unsafe condition.
    To ensure that in-service aircraft are free of such non-
conformities, this AD requires an inspection of the OHDS
installation along the bleed air ducting and, in case of findings
[any sensing element or insulation muff installed incorrectly], to
bring back the installation into the compliant configuration.

    Nonconforming installation or a failure of the OHDS could allow
undetected leakage of bleed air from the hot engine/auxiliary power
unit causing damage to the airplane structure and various airplane
components and systems. The inspection of the OHDS installation, for
certain airplanes, consists of inspecting the APU overheat sensing
elements APU 1 Loop A and B, the APU overheat sensing elements APU 2
Loop A and B, the crossbleed overheat sensing element, the forward
cargo compartment heating element, and the sensing element of the
overheat detection unit of the wing. For certain other airplanes,
inspecting the OHDS installation consists of inspecting the forward
cargo compartment heating element.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, do a
one-time detailed visual inspection to determine whether the OHDS
sensing elements and insulation muffs have been correctly installed,
in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A380-36-8004, dated
February 13, 2009.
    (2) If, during any inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of
this AD, any sensing element or insulation muff is found to have
been installed incorrectly, before further flight, bring the
installation into compliant configuration, in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A380-36-8004, dated February 13, 2009.
    (3) Submit a report of the findings (both positive and negative)
of the inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD to Airbus,
Customer Services Directorate, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex France, as specified in Figures A-GBCAA and A-GBDAA of
Airbus Service Bulletin A380-36-8004, dated February 13,

2009, at the applicable time specified in paragraph (f)(3)(i) or
(f)(3)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the inspection.
    (ii) If the inspection was accomplished prior to the effective
date of this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the
effective date of this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1:  This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Todd
Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness
Directive 2009-0066, dated March 19, 2009; and Airbus Service
Bulletin A380-36-8004, dated February 13, 2009; for related
information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (i) You must use Airbus Service Bulletin A380-36-8004, dated
February 13, 2009, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the
AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS--EANA (Airworthiness Office); 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 562 110 253;
Fax +33 562 110 307; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.airbus.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 6, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-16763 Filed 7-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 61 (Thursday, April 1, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17106-17109]
[FR Doc No: 2021-06754]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R08-OAR-2020-0646; FRL-10021-65-Region 8]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Utah; 2017
Base Year Inventories for the 2015 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard for the Uinta Basin, Northern Wasatch Front and
Southern Wasatch Front Nonattainment Areas

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
State of Utah. The revision fulfills the base year inventory
requirement for the 2015 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality
standard (NAAQS) for the Uinta Basin, Northern Wasatch Front, and
Southern Wasatch Front nonattainment areas. Utah submitted the base
year emissions inventories to meet, in part, the nonattainment
requirements for Marginal ozone nonattainment areas under the 2015 8-
hour ozone NAAQS. EPA is taking this action pursuant to sections 110,
172, and 182 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 3, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-
OAR-2020-0646, to the Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
www.regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio,
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written
comment is considered the official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance
on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available electronically in
www.regulations.gov. To reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission, for
this action we do not

plan to offer hard copy review of the docket. Please email or call the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section if you
need to make alternative arrangements for access to the docket.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Lang, Air and Radiation
Division, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode 8ARD-IO, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202-1129,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.

I. Background

    Ground-level ozone is formed when nitrogen oxides (NOX)
and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) react in the presence of
sunlight. Referred to as ozone precursors, these two pollutants are
emitted by many types of pollution sources, including motor vehicles,
power plants, industrial facilities, and area wide sources, such as
consumer products and lawn and garden equipment. Scientific evidence
indicates that adverse public health effects may occur following
exposure to ozone pollution. These effects are more pronounced in
children and adults with lung disease. Breathing air containing ozone
can reduce lung function and inflame airways, which can increase
respiratory symptoms and aggravate asthma or other lung diseases. In
1979, in response to this scientific evidence, EPA promulgated the
first ozone NAAQS, the 0.12 part per million (ppm) 1-hour ozone
NAAQS.\1\ EPA had previously promulgated a NAAQS for total
photochemical oxidants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for
Photochemical Oxidants, 44 FR 8202 (Feb. 8, 1979).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated a revised ozone NAAQS of 0.08
ppm, averaged over eight hours.\2\ EPA determined this standard to be
more protective of public health than the previous 1979 1-hour ozone
standard. In 2008, EPA revised the 8-hour ozone NAAQS from 0.08 to
0.075 ppm.\3\ On October 26, 2015, EPA again strengthened the 8-hour
ozone NAAQS to 0.070 ppm, based on extensive scientific evidence about
ozone's effects on public health and welfare.\4\ Effective August 3,
2018, EPA designated the Uinta Basin, Northern Wasatch Front, and
Southern Wasatch Front areas as Marginal nonattainment for the more
stringent 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone, 62 FR
38856.
    \3\ National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone, 73 FR
16436 (March 27, 2008).
    \4\ National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone, 80 FR
65292.
    \5\ Additional Air Quality Designations for the 2015 Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards, 83 FR 25776 (June 4, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Uinta Basin Nonattainment Area (NAA) is comprised of portions
of Duchesne and Uintah Counties. The Northern Wasatch Front NAA
includes Salt Lake, Davis, and portions of Weber and Tooele Counties.
The Southern Wasatch Front NAA is comprised of only a portion of Utah
County.
    Under section 172(c)(3) of the CAA, Utah is required to submit
comprehensive, accurate, and current inventories of actual emissions
from all sources of the relevant pollutants in its Marginal
nonattainment areas, i.e., the Uinta Basin NAA, Northern Wasatch Front
NAA, and Southern Wasatch Front NAA.\6\ Specific to areas classified as
Marginal ozone nonattainment, CAA section 182(a)(1) requires that a
base year inventory of ozone precursors be submitted within two years
of the nonattainment designation.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 42 U.S.C. 7502(c)(3).
    \7\ Id. 7511a(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EPA's guidance for emissions inventory development specifically
calls for states to report ``ozone season day emissions'' in the base
year inventory.\8\ EPA's regulations define ozone season day emissions
as an average day's emissions for a typical ozone season work
weekday.\9\ Although elevated ground-level ozone is typically a
summertime issue for many areas, high ground-level ozone can occur
during the winter with the presence of temperature inversions and snow
cover as well as sufficient solar radiation and ozone precursors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ EPA, Emissions Inventory Guidance for Implementation of
Ozone and Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) and Regional Haze Regulations, May 2017, 21, 45, 75.
    \9\ 40 CFR 51.1300(q).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    CAA sections 172 and 182 identify additional plan submissions and
requirements for ozone nonattainment areas. Under sections 172(c)(5)
and 182(a)(3)(B) of the CAA, Utah is required to implement a
nonattainment new source review permit program and emission statement
requirement, respectively.\10\ EPA will act on SIP revisions that
address these two requirements separately from the base year emissions
inventories at issue in this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 42 U.S.C. 7502(c)(5); 7511a(a)(3)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Summary of SIP Revision

    On July 30, 2020, the Utah Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) submitted
a SIP revision titled ``2017 Marginal Ozone Inventories'' to satisfy
the emission inventory requirements under CAA sections 172(c)(3) and
182(a)(1).\11\ On January 28, 2021, UDAQ submitted a superseding
supplement to the earlier submission, which corrected and explained
administrative errors in Utah's SIP revision.\12\ Utah met the
reasonable notice and public hearing requirements of CAA section 110(a)
for the SIP revision through reasonable notice posted on June 11, 2020,
and notice of a public hearing for July 16, 2020.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Letter dated July 29, 2020, from Gary R. Herbert, Governor,
State of Utah, to Gregory Sopkin, Regional Administrator, EPA,
Region 8.
    \12\ Utah, Utah Administrative Documentation, Marginal Ozone
Inventory Supplement, January 2021 (``UT SIP Revision'').
    \13\ Id. at 68, 86-87, 107-108.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Utah's SIP revision uses 2017 as its base year for SIP planning
purposes, as recommended in EPA's implementation rule for the 2015
Ozone NAAQS.\14\ The 2017 base year inventories represent
NOX and VOC emissions estimates for an average episode day
(work weekday) during the peak ozone season of an area. For the Uinta
Basin NAA, an average episode day during the peak ozone season is in
February. For the Northern Wasatch Front NAA and Southern Wasatch Front
NAA, an average episode day during the peak ozone season is in
July.\15\ The inventories were developed for all major source
categories including point sources, area (nonpoint) sources, and mobile
sources, including both nonroad mobile and on-road mobile sources.\16\
Additionally, the Uinta Basin NAA inventory included a separate oil and
gas source category.\17\ Emissions sources in the Uinta Basin are
located both in state land and in Indian country. We note that the
Uinta Basin portion of Utah's SIP revision includes only emissions from
sources located on state lands within the Uinta Basin NAA.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ Implementation of the 2015 National Ambient Air Quality
Standards for Ozone: Nonattainment Area State Implementation Plan
Requirements, 83 FR 62998, 63004-05, 63011 n.29 (December 6, 2018).
    \15\ UT SIP Revision at 92, 98, 103.
    \16\ Id. at 93, 99, 104.
    \17\ Note that Utah included oil and gas emissions as area
sources for the Northern and Southern Wasatch NAAs. See, e.g., UDAQ,
Area Source Inventories, April 2, 2020.
    \18\ UT SIP Revision at 95. See also 40 CFR 51.1, 51.15(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Tables 1-3 of this document summarize the 2017 VOC and
NOX emission inventory by source sector for the Uinta Basin
NAA, Northern Wasatch Front NAA, and Southern Wasatch Front NAA. Ozone
season weekday emissions are given in tons per day (tpd).

    Table 1--Uinta Basin Nonattainment Area 2017 VOC and NOX Baseline
                           Emissions Inventory
                             [Tons/Day] \19\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Source type                       NOX          VOC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point.........................................         1.07         0.73
Nonpoint......................................         0.22         1.46
On-road Mobile................................         3.24         1.22
Nonroad Mobile................................          0.1         0.11
Oil & Gas.....................................        10.61         37.4
                                               -------------------------
    Total.....................................        15.24        40.93
------------------------------------------------------------------------

   Table 2--Northern Wasatch Front Nonattainment Area 2017 VOC and NOX
                      Baseline Emissions Inventory
                             [Tons/Day] \20\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Source type                       NOX          VOC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point.........................................        18.83         5.88
Nonpoint......................................         1.25        44.48
On-road Mobile................................        52.46        28.56
Nonroad Mobile................................        27.59        18.54
                                               -------------------------
    Total.....................................       100.12        97.46
------------------------------------------------------------------------

   Table 3--Southern Wasatch Front Nonattainment Area 2017 VOC and NOX
                      Baseline Emissions Inventory
                             [Tons/Day] \21\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Source type                       NOX          VOC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point.........................................         1.25         0.21
Nonpoint......................................         0.56         13.1
On-road Mobile................................        14.93         7.07
Nonroad Mobile................................         5.18         3.67
                                               -------------------------
    Total.....................................        21.92        24.06
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Point sources are large, stationary, identifiable sources of
emissions that release pollutants into the atmosphere. For Utah's 2017
base year inventories, the State determined point source emissions in
the three nonattainment areas from source-reported data in the UDAQ
State and Local Emissions Inventory System (SLEIS) database, which
includes any source that has the potential to emit greater than or
equal to 100 tons per year of NOX or VOCs. The point source
actuals are reported in tons per year.\22\ Utah's SIP revision uses the
emissions processing software SMOKE (Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel
Emissions) to distribute inventoried pollutants in time and space,
including to a 24-hour period.\23\ The SMOKE Emissions Processing
technical support document included with Utah's SIP revision describes
the processing software in greater detail.\24\ A further description of
the point source emissions inventory is found in the Base Year Ozone
SIP Point Source Inventory technical support document included with
Utah's SIP revision.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Id. at 95; Note that the Uinta Basin inventory represents
only emissions from State land in the Uinta Basin NAA.
    \20\ Id. at 100.
    \21\ Id. at 105.
    \22\ See, e.g., id. at 95.
    \23\ Id. at 94, 100, 105.
    \24\ UDAQ, SMOKE Emissions Processing, June 10, 2020.
    \25\ Utah, Base Year Ozone SIP Point Source Inventory (listing
point sources by NAA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nonpoint sources, also known as area sources, are sources of
pollution that are small and numerous, and that have not been
inventoried as specific point or mobile sources. They include a wide
range of sources including, for example, dry cleaners, residential
heating and cooling, auto body painting, and consumer solvents. To
inventory nonpoint sources, sources are grouped so that emissions can
be estimated collectively using one methodology. For Utah's 2017 base
year emissions inventories, the State determined area emissions from
UDAQ's area source emissions calculation workbooks that are the
foundation for data in the 2017 National Emissions Inventory (NEI).\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ UT SIP Revision at 93, 99, 104.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The on-road mobile source portion of the State's 2017 base year
inventories includes emissions from vehicles, such as cars, trucks,
trash trucks, over-the-road diesel trucks, and buses, which are
operated on public roadways. These emissions were estimated using EPA's
Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) model version MOVES2014b.
Metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) determined on-road emissions
for the urban nonattainment areas. The Utah Department of
Transportation (UDOT) determined on-road emissions for rural
nonattainment counties and UDAQ determined emissions in rural counties
in attainment. The on-road mobile source portion of the inventories for
the Uinta Basin NAA, Northern Wasatch Front NAA, and Southern Wasatch
Area were developed by UDOT, the Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC)
MPO and the Mountainland Association of Governments (MAG) MPO,
respectively.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ Id. at 94, 100, 105.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The On-road Mobile Sources technical support document \28\ included
with the State's submittal details MOVES modeling inputs including
speeds, vehicle fuel properties and specifications, Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT), inspection and maintenance profiles, VMT mix, vehicle
age distributions, and meteorological conditions.\29\ VMT within the
NAAs is based on their respective transportation model's output data
from the UDOT, MAG, and WFRC.\30\ The MOVES modeling used
meteorological inputs for the Uinta Basin NAA based on conditions for
an ozone exceedance event from February 1-10, 2013, in Uintah, Utah,
and conditions on an average July day in 2017 for both the Southern
Wasatch Front NAA and Northern Wasatch Front NAA. UDOT, MAG, and WFRC
developed the on-road inventories in the State's submittal using MOVES
2014b default fuel parameters for diesel and compressed natural gas.
The inventories adjusted gasoline fuel parameters for gasoline sulfur
levels in Utah since small volume refiners were not required to comply
with federal Tier 3 gasoline (10 ppm sulfur) requirements until January
1, 2020. Utah notes in the technical support document for on-road
mobile sources that the EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality
(OTAQ) provided the 2017 local gasoline sulfur value of 20.9 ppm.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ Utah provided a separate technical support document for
each source sector in each of the three NAAs. Each technical support
document contains largely the same material regarding methodology.
Thus, for ease of reference, we will cite to the technical support
document for the Northern Wasatch Front NAA unless otherwise
specified. Please see the docket for specific technical support
documents.
    \29\ See, e.g., UDAQ, Technical Support Document for On-road
Mobile Sources: Summertime 2017 Baseline Ozone Emissions Inventory
for the Northern Wasatch Front, UT Nonattainment Area and
Surrounding Modeling Domain in Utah, April 2020, 5.
    \30\ Id. at 6-7.
    \31\ Id. at 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nonroad mobile sources are mobile sources other than on-road
vehicles, including aircraft, locomotives, construction and
agricultural equipment, recreational equipment like snowmobiles, and
marine vessels. The 2017 base year inventory includes emissions from
nonroad mobile sources, excluding aircraft and locomotives, as
estimated for the Uinta Basin NAA, Northern Wasatch Front NAA, and
Southern Wasatch Front NAA by EPA's Non-Road Model. EPA's Non-Road
Model is incorporated into EPA's MOVES model.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ Utah SIP Revision at 94, 100, 105.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The State prepared aircraft emissions from data reported by the
2017 NEI, and determined emissions from airport ground support
equipment using the Federal Aviation Administration's Aviation
Environmental Design Tool.\33\

For rail yard emissions, associated with the operation of switcher
engines, Utah used emissions reported by the 2017 NEI that are compiled
by the Eastern Regional Technical Advisory Committee. Commuter rail
emissions from UTA FrontRunner are also included.\34\ The State
processed the nonroad emissions for the inventories included in the
State's submittal with SMOKE. Additional information describing the
development of the inventory of the nonroad mobile source sector can be
found in the Non-Road Mobile Source technical support document included
with the State's submittal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ UDAQ, Technical Support Document Non-Road Mobile Source:
Ozone Inventory for 2017 Base Year, February and July, April 2020,
3, 5.
    \34\ Id. at page 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To inventory oil and gas emissions, Utah explains in the SIP
revision that emissions within the Uinta Basin NAA were determined from
workbooks submitted by sources as well as EPA/NOMAD (Nonpoint Methods
Advisory group) oil and gas tool outputs.\35\ Additionally, the State
included emissions associated with off-road mobile oil and gas and
nonroad oil and gas well pad construction equipment in the 2017 base
year inventory for the Uinta Basin NAA. Off-road mobile oil and gas
emissions are from mobile sources that operate within the oil and gas
fields located in the Uinta Basin NAA and were calculated in the base
year inventory from emission factors generated using MOVES2014b.\36\
Nonroad oil and gas well equipment emissions, which include emissions
from well pad, access road, and pipeline construction, were calculated
from emissions factors generated by the EPA MOVES2014b Non-Road
Model.\37\ Well counts for 2017 were provided for by the UDAQ Technical
Analysis Section from the Utah Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining for
both the determination of oil and gas off-road mobile and nonroad
emissions.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ Utah SIP Revision at 94.
    \36\ UDAQ, Technical Support Document 2017 Baseline Wintertime
Ozone Emissions Inventory: Off-road Mobile Sources Operating Within
the Oil and Gas Fields Located in the Uintah, UT Nonattainment Area,
March 2020, 5-6.
    \37\ UDAQ, Technical Support Document 2017 Baseline Wintertime
Ozone Emissions Inventory: Non-Road Well Pad Construction Equipment
Operating within the Oil and Gas Fields within the Uintah, UT
Nonattainment Area, March 2020, 4.
    \38\ Id. at 5; UDAQ, Technical Support Document 2017 Baseline
Wintertime Ozone Emissions Inventory: Off-road Mobile Sources
Operating Within the Oil and Gas Fields Located in the Uintah, UT
Nonattainment Area, March 2020, 9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EPA has reviewed Utah's 2017 base year emission inventories'
results, procedures, and methodologies for the Uinta Basin NAA,
Northern Wasatch Front NAA, and Southern Wasatch Front NAA and we
propose to find them approvable. EPA has concluded that the 2017 base
year inventories are based on the most current and accurate information
available to the State at the time the inventories were developed.
Additionally, the 2017 inventory comprehensively addresses all source
categories in Utah's NAAs and was developed consistent with the
relevant EPA emission inventory guidance and models.

III. Proposed Action

    As detailed in the Utah SIP Revision and summarized previously in
this proposed rulemaking, the procedures used by the State in
developing the 2017 base year inventories for the source sectors in the
Uinta Basin NAA, Northern Wasatch Front NAA, and Southern Wasatch Front
NAA satisfy the requirements of the CAA. Therefore, we are proposing to
approve the 2017 base year inventories for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS
for the Uinta Basin, Northern Wasatch Front, and Southern Wasatch Front
Marginal NAAs because the State prepared the inventories in accordance
with the requirements in sections 172(c)(3) and 182(a)(1) of the CAA
and its implementing regulations, including those at 40 CFR 51.1315.
EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this
document. EPA will consider these comments before taking final action.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the requirements of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and will
not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Greenhouse gases, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental
relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic
compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: March 23, 2021.
Debra H. Thomas,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2021-06754 Filed 3-31-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13533-13534]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04297]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30945; Amdt. No. 3579]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective March 11, 2014. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of March 11, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matters incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For Examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability--All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available
online free of charge. Visit http://www.nfdc.faa.gov to register.
Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP copies may
be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard A. Dunham III, Flight
Procedure Standards Branch (AFS-420), Flight Technologies and Programs
Divisions, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration,
Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd. Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by establishing,
amending, suspending, or revoking SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and/or ODPS.
The complete regulators description of each SIAP and its associated
Takeoff Minimums or ODP for an identified airport is listed on FAA form
documents which are incorporated by reference in this amendment under 5
U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 CFR 97.20. The applicable FAA
Forms are FAA Forms 8260-3, 8260-4, 8260-5, 8260-15A, and 8260-15B when
required by an entry on 8260-15A.
    The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, in addition
to their complex nature and the need for a special format make
publication in the Federal Register expensive and impractical.
Furthermore, airmen do not use the regulatory text of the SIAPs,
Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead refer to their depiction on
charts printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. The advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP listed on
FAA forms is unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR
sections and specifies the types of SIAPs and the effective dates of
the, associated Takeoff Minimums and ODPs. This amendment also
identifies the airport and its location, the procedure, and the
amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP as contained in the
transmittal. Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and textual ODP amendments
may have been issued previously by the FAA in a Flight Data Center
(FDC) Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency action of immediate
flight safety relating directly to published aeronautical charts. The
circumstances which created the need for some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums
and ODP amendments may require making them effective in less than 30
days. For the remaining SIAPS and Takeoff Minimums and ODPS, an
effective date at least 30 days after publication is provided.
    Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPS contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these SIAPS and
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied to the
conditions existing or anticipated at the affected airports. Because of
the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and
public procedures before adopting these SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and
ODPs are impracticable and contrary to the public interest and, where
applicable, that good cause exists for making some SIAPs effective in
less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule '' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,1979); and
(3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air traffic control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 14, 2014.
John Duncan,
Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) is amended by
establishing, amending, suspending, or revoking Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures and/or Takeoff Minimums and/or Obstacle Departure
Procedures effective at 0902 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

* * Effective 3 April 2014

Mountain Village, AK, Mountain Village, RNAV (GPS) RWY 20, Amdt 1A
Cullman, AL, Cullman Rgnl-Folsom Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 2, Amdt 1
Cullman, AL, Cullman Rgnl-Folsom Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 20, Amdt 1
Prescott, AZ, Ernest A. Love Field, GPS RWY 12, Orig-A, CANCELED
Prescott, AZ, Ernest A. Love Field, PRESCOTT ONE, Graphic DP
Prescott, AZ, Ernest A. Love Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 12, Orig
Prescott, AZ, Ernest A. Love Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 21L, Amdt 2
Prescott, AZ, Ernest A. Love Field, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Amdt 4
San Francisco, CA, San Francisco Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 28L, ILS RWY
28L (SA CAT II), Amdt 24B
San Francisco, CA, San Francisco Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 28R, ILS RWY
28R (CAT II), ILS RWY 28R (CAT III), ILS RWY 28R (SA CAT I), Amdt
12A
Alamosa, CO, San Luis Valley Rgnl/Bergman Field, VOR-A, Amdt 7
Alamosa, CO, San Luis Valley Rgnl/Bergman Field, VOR/DME-B, Amdt 5
Washington, DC, Washington Dulles Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 19L, ILS RWY
19L (SA CAT II), Amdt 15C
Washington, DC, Washington Dulles Intl, ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 1C, ILS
RWY 1C (SA CAT II), Amdt 2B
Miami, FL, Dade-Collier Training and Transition, ILS OR LOC RWY 9,
Amdt 15A
St Petersburg-Clearwater, FL, St Pete-Clearwater Intl, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 3A
Smith Center, KS, Smith Center Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Orig
Smith Center, KS, Smith Center Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig
Lincoln, ME, Lincoln Rgnl, VOR/DME-A, Amdt 2, CANCELED
Walker, MN, Walker Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 15, Orig
Walker, MN, Walker Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 33, Orig
Walker, MN, Walker Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Macon, MO, Macon-Fower Memorial, GPS RWY 2, Orig-A, CANCELED
Macon, MO, Macon-Fower Memorial, RNAV (GPS) RWY 2, Orig
Macon, MO, Macon-Fower Memorial, RNAV (GPS) RWY 20, Orig
Macon, MO, Macon-Fower Memorial, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Orig
Macon, MO, Macon-Fower Memorial, VOR/DME RWY 20, Amdt 2
Artesia, NM, Artesia Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 12, Amdt 1
Artesia, NM, Artesia Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 21, Amdt 1
Artesia, NM, Artesia Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, Amdt 1
Artesia, NM, Artesia Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Rochester, NY, Greater Rochester Intl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Amdt 8
Lancaster, OH, Fairfield County, LOC RWY 28, Amdt 2, CANCELED
Ravenna, OH, Portage County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Orig
Ravenna, OH, Portage County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 27, Amdt 1
Danville, PA, Danville, VOR-A, Orig
Perkasie, PA, Pennridge, NDB-A, Amdt 2A, CANCELED
Quakertown, PA, Quakertown, NDB RWY 29, Amdt 11, CANCELED
Brookings, SD, Brookings Rgnl, ILS OR LOC RWY 30, Orig-B, CANCELED
Brookings, SD, Brookings Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 12, Orig, CANCELED
Brookings, SD, Brookings Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, Orig, CANCELED
Brookings, SD, Brookings Rgnl, VOR RWY 12, Amdt 12, CANCELED
Brookings, SD, Brookings Rgnl, VOR RWY 30, Amdt 11A, CANCELED
Cleveland, TN, Hardwick Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 3, Orig-A, CANCELED
Cleveland, TN, Hardwick Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 21, Orig, CANCELED
Cleveland, TN, Hardwick Field, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 1, CANCELED
Lawrenceburg, TN, Lawrenceburg-Lawrence County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17,
Orig
Lawrenceburg, TN, Lawrenceburg-Lawrence County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35,
Orig
El Paso, TX, El Paso Intl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 7
Odessa, TX, Odessa-Schlemeyer Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 11, Orig-A
Spokane, WA, Spokane Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 25, Amdt 4
Spokane, WA, Spokane Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 25, Amdt 1
Baraboo, WI, Baraboo Wisconsin Dells, LOC/DME RWY 1, Amdt 1A
Milton, WV, Ona Airpark, GPS RWY 7, Orig, CANCELED
Milton, WV, Ona Airpark, RNAV (GPS)-A, Orig
Buffalo, WY, Johnson County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 31, Amdt 1
Hulett, WY, Hulett Muni, RNAV (GPS)-A, Amdt 1

* * * Effective 1 May 2014

Joliet, IL, Joliet Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 13, Orig, CANCELED
Joliet, IL, Joliet Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 4,
CANCELED
Joliet, IL, Joliet Rgnl, VOR RWY 13, Amdt 12, CANCELED
Gwinner, ND, Gwinner-Roger Melroe Field, NDB RWY 34, Amdt 2,
CANCELED
Tekamah, NE., Tekamah Muni, VOR RWY 33, Amdt 6, CANCELED

    RESCINDED: On January 17, 2014 (79 FR 3072), the FAA published
an Amendment in Docket No. 30936, Amdt No. 3571 to Part 97 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations under section 97.23. The following
entry for Santa Monica, CA, effective 6 February 2014 is hereby
rescinded in its entirety:

Santa Monica, CA, Santa Monica Muni, VOR-A, Amdt 11

[FR Doc. 2014-04297 Filed 3-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P