Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US

04/28/2008 10:44 AM

To

Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Subject

next batch for Pb RIA docket

Kathy Kaufman

EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C539-03

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>

----- Forwarded by Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US on 04/28/2008 10:43 AM -----

Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US

01/10/2008 10:53 AM

To

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Allen Basala/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Neal Fann/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

RE: Pb next week?

Heidi, no problem.  I couldn't find the "source information" reference in past emails,  -- maybe I mistakenly deleted something or heard it verbally from my management -- but it sounds like we're on the same page anyway.

Kathy Kaufman

EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C539-03

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> 01/10/2008 10:47 AM

To

Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Allen Basala/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Neal Fann/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

RE: Pb next week?

You are correct - previous briefing but opened up to the interagency

group, with awareness that MACT is an area of interest to some and we

also want to speak briefly on Energy Exec Order.

Thank you for being thorough, Kathy, it saves us all time in the long

run.

Best regards,

heidi

-----Original Message-----

From<EMAIL_ADDRESS> <EMAIL_ADDRESS> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 9:07 AM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> <EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Subject: RE: Pb next week?

Heidi, thanks, your answers are really helpful.

On the question about "source information" -- I'll shoot the email back

to you, but yes, it was the risk assessment email.  So I'm surmising

there's nothing additional beyond what was in the previous briefings,

but please tell me if I'm wrong.

Thanks for your prompt reply!

-- Kathy

Kathy Kaufman

EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C539-03

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>

             "King, Heidi R."

             <Heidi_R._King@o

             mb.eop.gov>                                             To

                                      Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

             01/09/2008 03:58                                        cc

             PM                       Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia

                                      Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Allen

                                      Basala/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Neal

                                      Fann/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

                                                                Subject

                                      RE: Pb next week?

Hi Kathy, thank you for your work on this.  I tried to reply thoroughly

to each of your questions below.

-- are you asking whether the cost analysis will take into account

controls that have been or will be applied as a result of MACT

standards?  The short answer is yes, we are taking that co-control into

account for the stationary sources near potentially violating monitors

>> Thank you, that is indeed the question as I understood it from

interagency colleagues.  They may have more specific questions on

specific controls, but that has not been shared with me.

-- but is there more detail needed for next week's meeting in regard to

specific MACT standards?  I'm trying to figure out who I may need to

pull in.

>> Not that I know of.  (I also wouldn't recommend that this become a

MACT meeting - we have too much to cover - so follow ups to specific

detailed questions would be appropriate, in my opinion.)

-- Also, in your original note last week you mentioned wanting to focus

on "source information" -- is that what the MACT question above refers

to, or are there additional "source" questions that we should be

prepared to answer?

>> I'm sorry, an email on the Pb NAAQS RIA using the term "source

information" doesn't come to mind quickly - but this is not likely the

MACT question.  I was probably referring to a) information about sources

of Pb, including emitting sources or other environmental sources, and/or

b) paucity of data sources that we'll be able to use in this analysis

and/or c) identifying what are the sources (research and data) used in

the analysis.  If you could bounce that email back to me I'd be happy to

clarify; I'm sorry I can't find it in my outbox.  (Is this the Risk

Assessment note?)

If so, do you know what those might be?   (i.e. cost questions,

inventory questions, etc.). Again I want to make sure I have the right

people and/or briefing material.

>> I thought the briefing you shared with OMB was about right as an

introduction, with the addition of time identified to talk about the

Energy EO, and an awareness that MACT assumptions in the baseline was

likely to come up from briefing participants.

Two other questions that came up when we talked with Lydia today:

1.  It would be helpful to know which agencies will be represented at

the meeting next week.

>> Invitees include:

Ag

Commerce

Defense

Energy

Interior

SBA

Transportation

CEQ

OVP

OSHA and another of the health agencies - I'll check (but it was not

CDC, rather a standards-setting group) CEA and OMB Budget colleagues

have also been invited, but I haven't heard replies yet

Also, Lydia was wondering if you had identified a CDC representative,

and if so, who that is.  Thanks.

>>  I have invited and shared a draft of materials with Dept of

Health/Dept of Labor.  They have not accepted yet.

2.  Per Ron's earlier conversation with you on deadlines:   Given the

ozone deadlines in February, we're presuming you will be needing

February to be focusing on ozone.  Therefore our current plan is to get

the Pb RIA to you by late February.   Are we correct in assuming late

February is a reasonable plan for the Pb RIA?  (We're just trying to be

as realistic as we can).

>> Of course, the earlier the better, but I'm assuming that end of Feb

is the best we all can do -- I appreciate your willingness to give the

reviewers a leg-up with this pre-brief.

I hope this answers your questions; please feel free to give me a call

also if I've been too wordy or unclear!

Heidi

Heidi R. King

OMB/OIRA

(202) 395-4551

-----Original Message-----

From<EMAIL_ADDRESS> <EMAIL_ADDRESS> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 3:21 PM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> <EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Subject: RE: Pb next week?

Heidi -- we just talked a little with Lydia, and we have a couple of

followup questions.

But first, on your note below -- by "treatment of all Pb MACT standards"

-- are you asking whether the cost analysis will take into account

controls that have been or will be applied as a result of MACT

standards?  The short answer is yes, we are taking that co-control into

account for the stationary sources near potentially violating monitors

-- but is there more detail needed for next week's meeting in regard to

specific MACT standards?  I'm trying to figure out who I may need to

pull in.

Also, in your original note last week you mentioned wanting to focus on

"source information" -- is that what the MACT question above refers to,

or are there additional "source" questions that we should be prepared to

answer? If so, do you know what those might be?   (i.e. cost questions,

inventory questions, etc.).   Again I want to make sure I have the right

people and/or briefing material.

Two other questions that came up when we talked with Lydia today:

1.  It would be helpful to know which agencies will be represented at

the meeting next week.  Also, Lydia was wondering if you had identified

a CDC representative, and if so, who that is.  Thanks.

2.  Per Ron's earlier conversation with you on deadlines:   Given the

ozone deadlines in February, we're presuming you will be needing

February to be focusing on ozone.  Therefore our current plan is to get

the Pb RIA to you by late February.   Are we correct in assuming late

February is a reasonable plan for the Pb RIA?  (We're just trying to be

as realistic as we can).

Thanks!

-- Kathy

Kathy Kaufman

EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C539-03

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>

             "King, Heidi R."

             <Heidi_R._King@o

             mb.eop.gov>                                             To

                                      Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

             01/09/2008 02:56                                        cc

             PM

                                                                Subject

                                      RE: Pb next week?

Kathy,

I sent out the invitations for our Pb RIA meeting, scheduled for Wed

10:30 - noon.

A couple of items that would be helpful to include on the agenda, as

I've been hearing these questions from interagency folks:

- Review of how the agency plans to assess whether this rule triggers

the Energy Exec Order (I suspect this will be quick!)

- Treatment of all Pb MACT standards in the RIA

Otherwise, I think the briefing you took OMB through would be great to

get this process started.

Thanks so much, let me know if there's anything I can do to facilitate

or clarify etc

Heidi

(202) 395-4551

-----Original Message-----

From<EMAIL_ADDRESS> <EMAIL_ADDRESS> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 11:49 AM

To: King, Heidi R.

Subject: RE: Pb next week?

Heidi, Margaret is working on setting up a meeting on the Pb RIA for

next week.

As an aside, she asked me to let you know that your other meeting is set

for this Friday, 1/11/08 @ 11:30am.  The call-in # is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kathy Kaufman

EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C539-03

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>

----- Forwarded by Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US on 04/28/2008 10:43 AM -----

Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US

01/15/2008 10:10 AM

To

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Marion Hoyer/AA/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

RE: invitation for FAA specifically for meeting with OMB Wed.

Heidi, that's great.  Thank you!

- Kathy

Kathy Kaufman

EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C539-03

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> 01/15/2008 10:04 AM

To

Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Subject

RE: invitation for FAA specifically for meeting with OMB Wed.

Kathy - by way of follow up, I haven't heard back from DoT yet but have

reached out to Warren at FAA to ask for his contact and add him to the

mailing list.

Best regards,

heidi

-----Original Message-----

From<EMAIL_ADDRESS> <EMAIL_ADDRESS> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:50 PM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> <EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Subject: Fw: invitation for FAA specifically for meeting with OMB Wed.

Heidi -- please see below -- FAA would like to participate on Wed on the

Pb RIA.  Is there a DC meeting place for interagency people, or is

everyone phoning in?

Thanks!

-- Kathy

Kathy Kaufman

EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C539-03

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>

----- Forwarded by Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US on 01/14/2008 12:47 PM

-----

             Marion

             Hoyer/AA/USEPA/U

             S                                                       To

                                      Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

             01/14/2008 11:44                                        cc

             AM                       Bryan Manning/AA/USEPA/US@EPA,

                                      Glenn Passavant/AA/USEPA/US@EPA

                                                                Subject

                                      invitation for FAA specifically

                                      for meeting with OMB Wed.

Hi Kathy,

Warren Gillette of FAA (our contact on avgas issues) would like an

invitation to the InterAgency meeting on the Pb RIA this Wed.  Is that

best arranged through Heidi?  Warren's contact info is below.  Do you

know if most of the participants are phoning in or is there a room

reserved for the InterAgency participants?  Warren is in DC so if most

people are attending in person he might want to have that option.

Thanks for facilitating this.

Marion

FAA contact on avgas:

Warren Gillette<PHONE_NUMBER>)

----- Forwarded by Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US on 04/28/2008 10:43 AM -----

Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US

01/15/2008 10:14 PM

To

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

RE: Materials for Pb NAAQS RIA Interagency briefing tomorrow?

Heidi, I've got a couple of additional changes to make when I get in, but I will have the slides to you by no later than 9:30 am.  I hope that works ok.

Kathy Kaufman

EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C539-03

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>

	To  	Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

	cc  	Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

	bcc

	Subject  	RE: Materials for Pb NAAQS RIA Interagency briefing tomorrow?

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> 01/15/2008 05:22 PM

Thx!

-----Original Message-----

From<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 5:22 PM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Subject: Re: Materials for Pb NAAQS RIA Interagency briefing tomorrow?

Kathy will distribute in the am.  She add to take some personal leave

this afternoon and did not get a chance to forward it to you.  I don't

have the final version.  Talk to you tomorrow

"King, Heidi R."

<Heidi_R._King@o

mb.eop.gov>                                             To

Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia

01/15/2008 05:13         Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Kathy

PM                       Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Subject

Materials for Pb NAAQS RIA

Interagency briefing tomorrow?

I would be happy to circulate any slides in advance of the meeting.

Best,

heidi

----- Forwarded by Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US on 04/28/2008 10:43 AM -----

Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US

01/16/2008 09:18 AM

To

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

RE: Materials for Pb NAAQS RIA Interagency briefing tomorrow?

Here you go!

Kathy Kaufman

EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C539-03

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> 01/16/2008 09:04 AM

To

Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Subject

RE: Materials for Pb NAAQS RIA Interagency briefing tomorrow?

Thanks!

-----Original Message-----

From<EMAIL_ADDRESS> <EMAIL_ADDRESS> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 10:14 PM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Subject: RE: Materials for Pb NAAQS RIA Interagency briefing tomorrow?

Heidi, I've got a couple of additional changes to make when I get in,

but I will have the slides to you by no later than 9:30 am.  I hope that

works ok.

Kathy Kaufman

EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C539-03

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>

      To      Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

      cc      Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia

Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

      bcc

      Subject       RE: Materials for Pb NAAQS RIA Interagency

briefing tomorrow?

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> 01/15/2008 05:22 PM

Thx!

-----Original Message-----

From<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 5:22 PM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Subject: Re: Materials for Pb NAAQS RIA Interagency briefing tomorrow?

Kathy will distribute in the am.  She add to take some personal leave

this afternoon and did not get a chance to forward it to you.  I don't

have the final version.  Talk to you tomorrow

"King, Heidi R."

<Heidi_R._King@o

mb.eop.gov>                                             To

Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia

01/15/2008 05:13         Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Kathy

PM                       Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Subject

Materials for Pb NAAQS RIA

Interagency briefing tomorrow?

I would be happy to circulate any slides in advance of the meeting.

Best,

heidi

----- Forwarded by Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US on 04/28/2008 10:43 AM -----

Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US

01/16/2008 12:30 PM

To

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Erika Sasser/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

Re: for your review: did I get the Pb NAAQS links correct for interagency distribution?

Yup, they're correct (thanks, Erika).

Kathy Kaufman

EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C539-03

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> 01/16/2008 11:57 AM

To

Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

for your review: did I get the Pb NAAQS links correct for interagency distribution?

Hi Kathy,

Good job this morning, it was a lively group with a diverse level of familiarity!

Below is what I propose to share with interagency Pb NAAQS review group.  Please let me know if I my phrasing is inaccurate or if I'm not pointing to most recent or best drafts.  Thank you;

best,

heidi

202 395 4551

************************

As promised, here are the links to documents supporting your participation in the interagency review of Pb NAAQS.

I.  A CASAC letter following ANPRM publication is forthcoming; The most recent CASAC letter is a review of the Staff Paper second draft; .

http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/2DCD6EF49CDD37B285257364005F9 3E4/$File/casac-07-007.pdf

II.  Criteria Document, Staff Paper and ANPRM for the Pb NAAQS is available at the following link.  Note that the Risk Assessment is located in the "Technical Documents" section:

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/pb/s_pb_index.html

----- Forwarded by Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US on 04/28/2008 10:43 AM -----

Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US

01/16/2008 12:32 PM

To

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Erika Sasser/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

PS

...and Heidi, thanks for all your help in keeping the briefing moving this morning!  (and thanks for getting those cites too).

Kathy Kaufman

EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C539-03

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>

Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US

01/16/2008 12:30 PM

To

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Erika Sasser/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

Re: for your review: did I get the Pb NAAQS links correct for interagency distribution?

Yup, they're correct (thanks, Erika).

Kathy Kaufman

EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C539-03

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> 01/16/2008 11:57 AM

To

Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

for your review: did I get the Pb NAAQS links correct for interagency distribution?

Hi Kathy,

Good job this morning, it was a lively group with a diverse level of familiarity!

Below is what I propose to share with interagency Pb NAAQS review group.  Please let me know if I my phrasing is inaccurate or if I'm not pointing to most recent or best drafts.  Thank you;

best,

heidi

202 395 4551

************************

As promised, here are the links to documents supporting your participation in the interagency review of Pb NAAQS.

I.  A CASAC letter following ANPRM publication is forthcoming; The most recent CASAC letter is a review of the Staff Paper second draft; .

http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/2DCD6EF49CDD37B285257364005F9 3E4/$File/casac-07-007.pdf

II.  Criteria Document, Staff Paper and ANPRM for the Pb NAAQS is available at the following link.  Note that the Risk Assessment is located in the "Technical Documents" section:

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/pb/s_pb_index.html