[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 125 (Thursday, June 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38629-38630]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15903]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9694-4]

Notice of Proposed Administrative Settlement Pursuant to the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of a proposed administrative settlement
concerning the Arkansas Waste to Energy Superfund Site, located in
Osceola, Mississippi County, Arkansas. The settlement requires the
settling party to pay a total of $220,000 as payment of response costs
to the Hazardous Substances Superfund. The settlement includes a
covenant not to sue pursuant to Section 107 of CERCLA. For thirty (30)
days following the date of publication of this notice, the Agency will
receive written comments relating to this notice and will receive
written comments relating to the settlement.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with Section 122 (i) of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act,
as amended (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a
proposed administrative settlement concerning the Arkansas Waste to
Energy Superfund Site, located in Osceola, Mississippi County,
Arkansas.
    The settlement requires the settling party to pay a total of
$220,000 as payment of response costs to the

Hazardous Substances Superfund. The settlement includes a covenant not
to sue pursuant to Section 107 of CERCLA, 42, U.S.C. 9607.
    For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this
notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to this
notice and will receive written comments relating to the settlement.
The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or
withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose
facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The Agency's response to any
comments received will be available for public inspection at 1445 Ross
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 30, 2012.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement and additional background
information relating to the settlement are available for public
inspection at 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. A copy of the
proposed settlement may be obtained from Cynthia Brown at, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. Comments
should reference the Arkansas Waste to Energy Superfund Site, located
in Osceola, Mississippi County, Arkansas, and EPA Docket Number 06-06-
11, and should be addressed to Cynthia Brown at the address listed
above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Malone, Assistant Regional
Counsel, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or call (214) 665-
8030.

    Dated: June 15, 2012.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2012-15903 Filed 6-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 99 (Wednesday, May 22, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23555-23556]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10598]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP19-465-000]

Oneok Rockies Midstream, L.L.C. and Steel Reef Burke, L.L.C.;
Notice of Application

    Take notice that on May 6, 2019, Oneok Rockies Midstream, L.L.C.
(Oneok), 100 West Fifth Street, Tulsa, OK, 74103 and Steel Reef Burke,
L.L.C. (Steel Reef), Suite 1200-333, 7th Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta
T2P 2Z1 Canada, filed in Docket No. CP19-465-000, a joint application
pursuant to section 3 of the Natural Gas Act and Part 153 of the
Commission's regulations requesting authorization to transfer ownership
and operation of the North Portal Pipeline Border Crossing Facilities
(Border Crossing Facilities). Specifically, ONEOK requests authority to
surrender its Section 3 Authorization and Presidential Permit of the
Border Crossing Facilities and to transfer ownership of such facilities
to Steel Reef. Steel Reef, in turn, seeks Section 3 Authorization and a
Presidential Permit in connection with its ownership of the Border
Crossing Facilities. The Border Crossing Facilities are an
approximately 1.2-mile pipeline that interconnects with a gathering
line located in Burke County, North Dakota, that has also been sold to
Steel Reef. The Border Crossing Facilities have been shut in since 2012
and plans have not yet been developed by Steel Reef to resume service.
All relevant information is more fully set forth in the application,
which is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection. The
filing may also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-
free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions regarding this application should be directed to
Chris Anderson, Steel Reef Infrastructure Corp., Suite 500-407, 8th
Avenue SW,

Calgary, Alberta T2P 1E5, Canada, or<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 3 copies of filings made with the Commission and must provide a
copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list and will be
notified of any meetings associated with the Commission's environmental
review process. Environmental commenters will not be required to serve
copies of filed documents on all other parties. However, the non-party
commenters will not receive copies of all documents filed by other
parties or issued by the Commission and will not have the right to seek
court review of the Commission's final order.
    As of the February 27, 2018 date of the Commission's order in
Docket No. CP16-4-001, the Commission will apply its revised practice
concerning out-of-time motions to intervene in any new Natural Gas Act
section 3 or section 7 proceeding.\1\ Persons desiring to become a
party to a certificate proceeding are to intervene in a timely manner.
If seeking to intervene out-of-time, the movant is required to ``show
good cause why the time limitation should be waived,'' and should
provide justification by reference to factors set forth in Rule
214(d)(1) of the Commission's Rules and Regulations.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C., 162 FERC ] 61,167 at
] 50 (2018).
    \2\ 18 CFR 385.214(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 3 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on June 5, 2019.

    Dated: May 15, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-10598 Filed 5-21-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26225-26226]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12076]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 6, 2018 /
Proposed Rules

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 29

[Docket No. FAA-2017-1128; Notice No. 29-045-SC]

Special Conditions: Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. (BHTI), Model
525 Helicopters; Control Margin Awareness

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for the BHTI Model 525
helicopter. This helicopter will have a novel or unusual design feature
associated with the fly-by-wire flight control system (FBW FCS) in the
area of pilot awareness of the control margins remaining while
maneuvering the helicopter. The applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design
feature. These proposed special conditions contain the additional
safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.

DATES: Send your comments on or before July 23, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number [FAA-2017-1128]
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery of Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 8 a.m., and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket website, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Harrum, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, Policy and Innovation Division, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
    We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing
date for comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is
possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change
these special conditions based on the comments we receive.

Background

    On December 15, 2011, BHTI applied for a type certificate for a new
transport category helicopter designated as the Model 525. The Model
525 is a medium twin-engine rotorcraft. The design maximum takeoff
weight is 20,500 pounds, with a maximum capacity of 19 passengers and a
crew of 2.
    The BHTI Model 525 helicopter will be equipped with a four-axis
full authority digital FBW FCS that provides for aircraft control
through pilot input and coupled flight director modes. The current 14
CFR part 29 regulations do not contain adequate standards for FBW FCS
with respect to control margin awareness. The airworthiness standards
for controllability and maneuverability of the rotorcraft are contained
in Sec.  29.143. These controllability requirements are compatible with
most FBW systems, while most of the maneuverability requirements are
not affected by FBW systems, except for the control margins. One of the
purposes of the rule is to ensure that control margins (at the rotor
and the anti-torque system level) are sufficient in the defined flight
envelope to avoid loss of control (that is, the rotorcraft has adequate
control power for the pilot to exit potentially hazardous flight
conditions). Implicit in this purpose is that the pilot is provided
with sufficient awareness of proximity to control limits. Because Sec.
29.143 was written to address hydro-mechanical flight control systems,
through which pilot awareness of control margins is provided by cyclic
and pedal position relative to cockpit control stops, the rule is
inadequate for certification of a FBW FCS, where there is no mechanical
link between the inceptor and the receptor. Without a constant
correlation between cockpit control and main or tail rotor actuator
positions, the FCS may not provide tactile control margin feedback to
the pilot through cockpit control position relative to the control
position physical stop or limit, for all flight conditions. The
proposed special conditions will require the minimum safety standard to
ensure awareness of proximity to control limits at the main rotor and
tail rotor is provided to pilots of the Bell Model 525 helicopter.

Type Certification Basis

    Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17, BHTI must show that the Model
525 helicopter meets the applicable provisions of part 29, as amended
by Amendment 29-1 through 29-55 thereto. The BHTI Model 525
certification basis date is December 31,

2013, the effective date of application to the FAA.
    If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 29) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the BHTI Model 525 because of a novel
or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of Sec.  21.16.
    Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same or similar
novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would also
apply to the other model under Sec.  21.101.
    In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the BHTI Model 525 helicopter must comply with the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36, and the FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under section 611 of Public Law 92-574,
the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
    The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec.  11.38, and they become part of the type-
certification basis under Sec.  21.17(a)(2).

Novel or Unusual Design Features

    The BHTI Model 525 helicopter will incorporate the following novel
or unusual design features: A four-axis full authority digital FBW FCS.
Pilot control inputs, through the mechanically linked cockpit controls
(cyclic, collective, directional pedals), are transmitted electrically
to each of the three Flight Control Computers (FCCs). The pilot control
input signals are then processed and transmitted to the hydraulic
flight control actuators which affect control of the main and tail
rotors.

Discussion

    The proposed special condition will require the minimum safety
standard to ensure awareness of proximity to control limits at the main
rotor and tail rotor is provided to pilots of the Bell Model 525
helicopter. The system design must provide the pilot with sufficient
awareness of proximity to control limits, traditionally achieved
through conventional flight controls by the pilot's inherent awareness
of cyclic stick and pedal position relative to control stops.

Applicability

    As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
BHTI Model 525 helicopter. Should BHTI apply at a later date for a
change to the type certificate to include another model incorporating
the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would
apply to that model as well.

Conclusion

    This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one model of rotorcraft. It is not a rule of general applicability.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 29

    Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.

The Proposed Special Conditions

    Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of the type certification basis
for Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., Model 525 helicopters:

Control Margin Awareness

    In addition to the existing Sec.  29.143 requirements, the
following special condition applies: The system design must ensure that
the flight crew is made suitably aware whenever the means of primary
flight control approaches the limits of control authority. For the
context of this special condition, the term ``suitable'' indicates an
appropriate balance between nuisance and necessary operation.

    Issued in Ft. Worth, Texas, on May 24, 2018.
Jorge Castillo,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, Policy and Innovation
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-12076 Filed 6-5-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: August 10, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 154)]
[Notices]
[Page 45803]
[DOCID:fr10au06-39]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. RP06-453-000]

Enbridge Offshore Pipelines (UTOS) LLC; Notice of Proposed
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

August 3, 2006.
    Take notice that on July 31, 2006, Enbridge Offshore Pipelines
(UTOS) LLC (UTOS) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff,
First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become
effective August 31, 2006:

Second Revised Sheet No. 162.
First Revised Sheet No. 326.
First Revised Sheet No. 327.
First Revised Sheet No. 328.
First Revised Sheet No. 329.
First Revised Sheet No. 330.
First Revised Sheet No. 331.
Original Sheet No. 332.
Original Sheet No. 333.
Original Sheet No. 334.
Original Sheet No. 335.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-13073 Filed 8-9-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 193 (Tuesday, October 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60398-60399]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25371]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2015-0022; OMB No. 1660-0054]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program and Fire
Prevention and Safety Grants--Grant Application Supplemental
Information

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites
the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity
to comment on a revision of a currently approved information
collection. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
this notice seeks comments concerning grant application information
necessary to assess the needs and benefits of applicants for the
Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program (AFG) and Fire Prevention and
Safety (FP&S) grants.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before December 7, 2015.

ADDRESSES: To avoid duplicate submissions to the docket, please use
only one of the following means to submit comments:
    (1) Online. Submit comments at www.regulations.gov under Docket ID
FEMA-2015-0022. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    (2) Mail. Submit written comments to Docket Manager, Office of
Chief Counsel, DHS/FEMA, 500 C Street SW., 8NE, Washington, DC 20472-
3100.
    All submissions received must include the agency name and Docket
ID. Regardless of the method used for submitting comments or material,
all submissions will be posted, without change, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov, and will include any
personal information you provide. Therefore, submitting this
information makes it public. You may wish to read the Privacy Act
notice that is available via the link in the footer of
www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Dunham, Fire Program
Specialist, FEMA, Grant Program Directorate,<PHONE_NUMBER>. You may
contact the Records Management Division for copies of the proposed
collection of information at email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This package is a revision to the collection
originally approved as the Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program--
Grant Application Supplemental Information, OMB Control Number: 1660-
0054. FEMA is updating the name of this collection from ``Assistance to
Firefighters Grant Program--Grant Application Supplemental
Information'' to ``Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program and Fire
Prevention and Safety Grants--Grant Application Supplemental
Information'' to reflect more accurately the grant programs covered.
Information sought under this submission will comprise of applications
for Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program (AFG) and Fire Prevention
and Safety (FP&S) grants. The Federal Fire Protection and Control Act
of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 2201 et seq.), as amended, authorizes FEMA to fund
fire department activities. The information collected through the
program's application is the minimum necessary to evaluate grant
applications and is necessary for FEMA to comply with mandates
delineated in the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974, as
amended.

Collection of Information

    Title: Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program and Fire Prevention
and Safety Grants--Grant Application Supplemental Information.
    Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved
information collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-0054.
    FEMA Forms: FEMA Form 080-0-2, Assistance to Firefighters Grants
(AFG) Application (General Questions and Narrative); FEMA Form 080-0-
2a, Activity Specific Questions for AFG Vehicle Applicants; FEMA Form
080-0-2b, Activity Specific Questions for AFG Operations and Safety
Applications; FEMA Form 080-0-3, Activity Specific Questions for Fire
Prevention and Safety (FP&S) Applicants; FEMA Form 080-0-3a, Fire
Prevention and Safety; FEMA Form 080-0-3b, Research and Development.
    Abstract: The FEMA forms for this collection are used to
objectively evaluate each of the anticipated applicants to determine
which applicants' submission in each of the AFG activities are close to
the established program priorities. FEMA also uses the information to
determine eligibility and whether the proposed use of funds meets the
requirements and intent of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act
of 1974, as amended.
    Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal Government; Not-for-profit
Institutions.
    Number of Respondents: 22,000.
    Number of Responses: 22,000.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 158,590 hours.

                                                       Estimated Annualized Burden Hours and Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                        Number of                  Average       Total
                                       Form name/form      Number of    responses      Total      burden per     annual      Average      Total annual
        Type of  respondent                number         respondents      per       number of     response   burden  (in  hourly wage   respondent cost
                                                                        respondent   responses    (in hours)     hours)        rate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State, Local or Tribal Government.  Assistance to              10,000            1       10,000            9       90,000       $49.50     $4,455,000.00
                                     Firefighters Grants
                                     (AFG) Application
                                     (General Questions
                                     and Narrative)/FEMA
                                     Form 080-0-2.
State, Local or Tribal Government.  Activity Specific           2,600            1        2,600           11       28,600        49.50      1,415,700.00
                                     Questions for AFG
                                     Vehicle Applicants/
                                     FEMA Form 080-0-2a.

State, Local or Tribal Government.  Activity Specific           7,400            1        7,400          4.6       34,040        49.50      1,684,980.00
                                     Questions for AFG
                                     Operations and
                                     Safety Applications/
                                     FEMA Form 080-0-2b.
State, Local or Tribal Government.  Activity Specific             820            1          820          2.5        2,050        49.50        101,475.00
                                     Questions for Fire
                                     Prevention and
                                     Safety (FPS)
                                     Applicants/FEMA
                                     Form 080-0-3.
Not-for-profit Institutions.......  Activity Specific             180            1          180          2.5          450        49.50         22,275.00
                                     Questions for Fire
                                     Prevention and
                                     Safety (FPS)
                                     Applicants/FEMA
                                     Form 080-0-3.
State, Local or Tribal Government.  Fire Prevention and           820            1          820          2.5        2,050        49.50        101,475.00
                                     Safety/FEMA Form
                                     080-0-3a.
Not-for-profit Institutions.......  Fire Prevention and           130            1          130          2.5          325        49.50         16,087.50
                                     Safety/FEMA Form
                                     080-0-3a.
Not-for-profit Institutions.......  Research and                   50            1           50         21.5        1,075        48.50         52,137.50
                                     Development/FEMA
                                     Form 080-0-3b.
                                   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.........................  ....................       22,000  ...........       22,000  ...........      158,590  ...........      7,849,130.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Note: The ``Avg. Hourly Wage Rate'' for each respondent includes a 1.4 multiplier to reflect a fully-loaded wage rate.

    Estimated Cost: The estimated annual cost to respondents for the
hour burden is $7,849,130.00. There are no annual costs to respondents'
operations and maintenance costs for technical services. There are no
annual start-up or capital costs. The cost to the Federal Government is
$3,319,699.04.

Comments

    Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency,
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b)
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

    Dated: September 30, 2015.
Richard W. Mattison,
Records Management Program Chief, Mission Support, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2015-25371 Filed 10-5-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-78P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55657-55658]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22064]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

46 CFR Part 11

[Docket No. USCG-2004-17914]
RIN 1625-AA16

Implementation of the Amendments to the International Convention
on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers,
1978, and Changes to National Endorsements; Corrections

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Correcting amendments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard published in the Federal Register of December
24, 2013 (78 FR 77796), a final rule entitled ``Implementation of the
Amendments to the International Convention on Standards of Training,
Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978, and Changes to
National Endorsements''. This document corrects two amended CFR
sections that are causing inconsistencies in interpretation.

DATES: This correction is effective on September 17, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this final
rule, call or email Mr. E.J. Terminella, Project Manager, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
If you have questions on viewing material on the docket, call Cheryl
Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard is correcting a final rule
that appeared in the Federal Register of December 24, 2013 (78 FR
77796), entitled ``Implementation of the Amendments to the
International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and
Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978, and Changes to National
Endorsements''. Amendments to 46 CFR 11.705 and 11.711 published in the
final rule require correction. The Coast Guard has determined that
these changes were a result of an oversight in drafting and are causing
inconsistencies in the interpretation of the application of the
requirement. This correction will ensure the two sections revert back
to the language that was in place before the final rule went into
effect.

List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 11

    Incorporation by reference, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Schools, Seamen, Transportation Worker Identification
Card.

    Accordingly, 46 CFR part 11 is amended by making the following
correcting amendments:

PART 11--REQUIREMENTS FOR OFFICER ENDORSEMENTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 11 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 14 U.S.C. 633; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 46 U.S.C. 2101, 2103,
and 2110; 46 U.S.C. chapter 71; 46 U.S.C. 7502, 7505, 7701, 8906,
and 70105; Executive Order 10173; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1. Section 11.107 is also issued under the
authority of 44 U.S.C. 3507.

Sec.  11.705  [Amended]

0
2. In Sec.  11.705, remove paragraph (f).
0
3. In Sec.  11.711, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:

Sec.  11.711  Tonnage requirements.

* * * * *
    (c) If an applicant does not have sufficient experience on vessels
of 1,600 GRT/3,000 GT or more, the endorsement will be for a limited
tonnage until the applicant completes a number of additional
roundtrips, as determined by the OCMI, within the range contained in
Sec.  11.705(b) or (c) of this subpart, as appropriate on vessels of
1,600 GRT/3,000 GT or more.
* * * * *

    Dated: September 11, 2014.
Katia G. Cervoni,
Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2014-22064 Filed 9-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 17 (Wednesday, January 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4708-4710]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01539]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-76959; File No. SR-C2-2015-033]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 2 and Order Granting Accelerated
Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2
Thereto, Relating to Price Protection Mechanisms for Quotes and Orders

January 21, 2016.

I. Introduction

    C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the ``Exchange'' or ``C2'')
filed on November 25, 2015, with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposal to enhance its current price protection mechanisms and adopt
certain new price protection functionality for orders and quotes. On
December 4, 2015, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed
rule change. The proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1,
was published for comment in the Federal Register on December 11,
2015.\3\ On December 29, 2015, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to
the proposed rule change.\4\ The Commission received no substantive
comment letters on the proposal. This order approves the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2, on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76584 (December 8,
2015), 80 FR 77047 (December 11, 2015) (``Notice'').
    \4\ In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange amended the proposed rule
language to (i) clarify that it will notify Trading Permit Holders
by electronic message if the Exchange determines that the put strike
price or call underlying value check should not apply in the
interest of maintaining a fair and orderly market under proposed
Exchange Rule 6.17(d)(ii) and (ii) limit the potential range of the
percentage amount used to calculate the maximum value acceptable
price range check in proposed Exchange Rule 6.13, Interpretation and
Policy .04(h)(1)(iii). In Amendment No. 2, C2 also represented that
it will document, retain, and periodically review any Exchange
decision to not apply the put check or call check under proposed
Exchange Rule 6.17(d)(ii), including the reason for the decision.
See Amendment No. 2 to File No. SR-C2-2015-033, dated December 29,
2015 (``Amendment No. 2''). To promote transparency of its proposed
amendment, when C2 filed Amendment No. 2 with the Commission, it
also submitted Amendment No. 2 as a comment letter to the file,
which the Commission posted on its Web site and placed in the public
comment file for SR-C2-2015-033. The Exchange also posted a copy of
its Amendment No. 2 on its Web site (http://www.c2exchange.com/legal/rulefilings.aspx) when it filed the amendment with the
Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment
Nos. 1 and 2

    The Exchange proposes to adopt new Exchange Rules 6.17(d) and (e)
and to amend Exchange Rule 6.13, Interpretation and Policy .04, to
enhance its current price protection mechanisms for orders and quotes
in order to help prevent potentially erroneous executions.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For a more detailed description of each proposed price
protection mechanism, see Notice, supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Put Strike Price and Call Underlying Value Checks

    Proposed Exchange Rule 6.17(d) will provide a new price protection
functionality pursuant to which the Exchange's automated trading system
(``System'') will reject back to the Participant a quote or buy limit
order for (i) a put if the price of the quote bid or order is equal to
or greater than the strike price of the option or (ii) a call if the
price of the quote bid or order is equal to or greater than the
consolidated last sale price of the underlying security, with respect
to equity and exchange-traded fund options, or the last disseminated
underlying index value, with respect to index options.\6\ The Exchange
may determine not to apply this proposed price protection mechanism if
a senior official at the Exchange's Help Desk determines the applicable
check should not apply in the interest of maintaining a fair and
orderly market.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ If the System rejects a Market Maker's quote pursuant to
either proposed price check, the Exchange will cancel any resting
quote of the Market Maker in the same series. See proposed Exchange
Rule 6.17(d); see also Notice, supra note 3, at 77048. These
proposed checks also will apply to buy auction responses in the same
manner as it does to orders and quotes, as well as pairs of orders
submitted to the Exchange's Automated Improvement Mechanism
(``AIM'') or Solicitation Auction Mechanism (``SAM''). See id.
    \7\ See proposed Exchange Rule 6.17(d)(ii); see also Notice,
supra note 3, at 77048. The Exchange represented that it will
document, retain, and periodically review any decision to not apply
the put check or call check, including the reason for the decision.
See Amendment No. 2, supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Quote Inverting NBBO Check

    Proposed Exchange Rule 6.17(e) will apply new a price reasonability
check to Market Maker quotes based on the national best bid or offer
(``NBBO'') or the Exchange's best bid or offer if the NBBO is
unavailable.\8\ Specifically, if C2 is at the NBBO, the System will
reject a quote back to a Market Maker if the quote bid or offer crosses
the opposite side of the NBBO by more than a number of ticks specified
by the Exchange.\9\ If C2 is not at the NBBO, the System will reject a
quote back to a Market-Maker if the quote bid or offer locks or crosses
the opposite side of the NBBO.\10\ The Exchange may determine not to
apply this check to quotes entered during the pre-opening, a trading
rotation, or a trading halt, and would announce to Participants any
such determination thorough a Regulatory Circular.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See proposed Exchange Rule 6.17(e); see also Notice, supra
note 3, at 77049-50.
    \9\ The Exchange states that the number of ticks will be no less
than three minimum increment ticks and announced to Participants by
Regulatory Circular. See proposed Exchange Rule 6.17(e); see also
Notice, supra note 3, at 77049. In addition, proposed Exchange Rule
6.17(e)(iii) addresses situations where C2 accepts a quote that
locks or crosses the NBBO.
    \10\ See proposed Exchange Rule 6.17(e)(i); see also Notice,
supra note 3, at 77050. As an additional risk control feature, if a
Market Maker submits a quote in a series in which the Market Maker
already has a resting quote and the Exchange rejects that quote
pursuant to this proposed check, the Exchange will cancel the Market
Maker's resting quote in the series. See Notice, supra note 3, at
77049.
    \11\ See proposed Exchange Rule 6.17(e)(ii); see also Notice,
supra note 3, at 77049-50. Additionally, this proposed check will
not apply if a senior official at the Exchange's Help Desk
determines it should not apply in the interest of maintaining a fair
and orderly market. See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Debit/Credit Price Reasonability Checks

    The Exchange proposes to amend its price check parameters
applicable to complex orders that are contained in current Exchange
Rule 6.13,

Interpretation and Policy .04, to prevent the automatic execution of
complex orders that appear to be erroneously priced based on general
options volatility and pricing principles.\12\ Under current Exchange
Rule 6.13, Interpretation and Policy .04, the System will not
automatically execute (i) a limit order for a debit strategy with a net
credit price that should have been entered at a net debit price, (ii) a
limit order for a credit strategy with a net debit price that should
have been entered at a net credit price, and (iii) a market order for a
credit strategy that would be executed at a net debit price when it
should execute at a net credit price.\13\ The amended rule expands this
check to certain complex orders which the System can determine are
credits or debits.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See proposed Exchange Rule 6.13, Interpretation and Policy
.04; see also Notice, supra note 3, at 77050-53.
    \13\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 77050.
    \14\ See id. at 77050. The proposed rule contains new
definitions of vertical spread, butterfly spread and box spread, and
states how the System will define a complex order as a debit or
credit. See id at 77050-51; see also proposed Exchange Rule 6.13,
Interpretation and Policy .04. These checks will also apply to buy
auction responses and pairs of orders submitted to AIM or SAM. See
proposed Exchange Rule 6.13, Interpretation and Policy .04(c)(4)-
(5); see also Notice, supra note 3, at 77053.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. Maximum Value Acceptable Price Range Check

    Finally, the Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 6.13,
Interpretation and Policy .04(h), to add an additional price check for
complex orders. The new price check would apply to vertical, true
butterfly, and box spreads, and would block executions of such
strategies at prices that exceed their quantifiable maximum possible
values by more than a reasonable amount.\15\ Under the proposed rule,
the Exchange will determine the acceptable price range for these
strategies and will reject back to the Participant any limit order and
cancel any market order that does not satisfy this proposed check.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See proposed Exchange Rule 6.13, Interpretation and Policy
.04(h); see also Notice, supra note 3, at 77053.
    \16\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 77053. The proposed check will
also apply to auction responses and pairs of orders submitted to AIM
or SAM. See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange
and, in particular, with Section 6(b) of the Act.\17\ In particular,
the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with
Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,\18\ which requires, among other things,
that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). In approving this proposed rule change,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that the proposed new price protection
mechanisms are reasonably designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade to the extent they are able to mitigate potential
risks associated with market participants entering orders at what C2
believes are clearly unintended prices and executing trades at prices
that are both extreme and potentially erroneous.\19\ Specifically, the
Commission believes that the proposed price protection for simple
orders to buy put and call options based on the strike price or
underlying value, respectively, is designed to promote fair and orderly
markets and protect investors by rejecting quotes and orders that
exceed the strike price for puts and the value of the underlying for
calls, which may likely have occurred due to human or operational
error. The Commission also believes that the proposed quote inverting
NBBO check is reasonably designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade by preventing potential price dislocation that
could result from erroneous Market Maker quotes sweeping through
multiple price points.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 77054.
    \20\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 77055.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the proposed enhanced price checks that would apply to
complex orders, including the debit and credit price reasonability
checks and the maximum value acceptable price range checks, are
designed to mitigate the potential risks associated with complex orders
trading at prices that likely are inconsistent with their strategies
and could potentially result in erroneous executions.\21\ Furthermore,
the Commission believes that the proposed maximum value acceptable
price range adds a second layer of price protection to complex
strategies that is reasonably designed to mitigate the potential risks
associated with orders that have complex strategies with quantifiable
maximum values trading at prices that are potentially erroneous.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See id. at 77055-56.
    \22\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above, the Commission
believes that the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment Nos. 1
and 2, is consistent with the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether Amendment No. 2
is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the
following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-C2-2015-033 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2015-033. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change;

the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-
2015-033 and should be submitted on or before February 17, 2016.

V. Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2

    The Commission finds good cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of
the Act, to approve the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment
Nos. 1 and 2, prior to the 30th day after the date of publication of
Amendment No. 2 in the Federal Register. As discussed above, Amendment
No. 2 clarified that the Exchange will notify Trading Permit Holders by
electronic message if the Exchange determines that the put strike price
or call underlying value check should not apply in the interest of
maintaining a fair and orderly market under proposed Exchange Rule
6.17(d)(ii).\23\ C2 also represented in Amendment No. 2 that the
Exchange will document, retain, and periodically review any Exchange
decision to not apply the put check or call check under proposed
Exchange Rule 6.17(d)(ii), including the reason for the decision.\24\
Lastly, in Amendment No. 2, C2 clarified that the potential range of
the percentage amount it will use to calculate the maximum value
acceptable price range check in proposed Exchange Rule 6.17,
Interpretation and Policy .04(h)(1)(iii), is between 1% and 5%.\25\ The
Commission believes that these changes provide greater clarity and
remove any possible uncertainty regarding the potential exercise of
Exchange discretion with regard to the proposed price protection
mechanisms. In particular, the representation about documenting,
retaining, and periodically reviewing decisions to suspend a price
check will enable C2 to monitor the actions of its senior Help Desk
personnel and assure that the suspension of any price check is
appropriate and consistent with C2's responsibilities as a self-
regulatory organization and the principles articulated in the Act that
are applicable to exchanges. Further, clarifying the possible range of
the maximum value acceptable price range provides valuable information
to Trading Permit Holders to help them better understand and evaluate
this price protection functionality. Accordingly, the Commission finds
good cause for approving the proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2, on an accelerated basis, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 4.
    \24\ Id.
    \25\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VI. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act
\26\ that the proposed rule change (SR-C2-2015-033), as modified by
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2, be, and hereby is, approved on an accelerated
basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(2).
    \27\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\27\
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-01539 Filed 1-26-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 187 (Monday, September 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58273-58276]
[FR Doc No: 2015-24496]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2015-0001; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1538]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Title
44, Part 65 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44 CFR part 65). The
LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to calculate
appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and the
contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will become effective on the
dates listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS
report in effect prior to this determination for the listed
communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has 90 days in
which to request through the community that the Deputy Associate
Administrator for Mitigation reconsider the changes. The flood hazard
determination information may be changed during the 90-day period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the

respective community map repository address listed in the table below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
(email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: September 10, 2015.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation, Department
of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Chief executive                       Online location
        State and county          Location and case      officer of        Community map     of letter of map        Effective date of        Community
                                         No.              community          repository          revision              modification              No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama:
    Jefferson..................  City of Leeds ((15- The Honorable       Inspections        http://            Nov. 30, 2015...............       010125
                                  04-4032P).          David Miller,       Department, 1040   www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                      Mayor, City of      Park Drive,        lomc.
                                                      Leeds, 1040 Park    Leeds, AL 35094.
                                                      Drive, Leeds, AL
                                                      35094.
    St. Clair..................  City of Moody (15-  The Honorable Joe   Inspection and     http://            Nov. 30, 2015...............       010187
                                  04-4032P).          Lee, Mayor, City    Public Works       www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                      of Moody, 670       Department, 670    lomc.
                                                      Park Avenue,        Park Avenue,
                                                      Moody, AL 35004.    Moody, AL 35004.
Colorado:
    Douglas....................  Town of Castle      The Honorable Paul  Utilities          http://            Dec. 4, 2015................       080050
                                  Rock                Donahue, Mayor,     Department, 175    www.msc.fema.gov/
                                  (15[dash]08[dash]   Town of Castle      Kellogg Road,      lomc.
                                  0069P).             Rock, 100 North     Castle Rock, CO
                                                      Wilcox Street,      80109.
                                                      Castle Rock, CO
                                                      80104.
    Douglas....................  Unincorporated      The Honorable Jill  Douglas County     http://            Dec. 4, 2015................       080049
                                  areas of Douglas    Repella, Chair,     Public Works       www.msc.fema.gov/
                                  County              Douglas County      Department, 100    lomc.
                                  (15[dash]08[dash]   Board of            3rd Street,
                                  0069P).             Commissioners,      Castle Rock, CO
                                                      100 3rd Street,     80104.
                                                      Castle Rock, CO
                                                      80104.
    Weld.......................  City of Severance   The Honorable Don   Town Hall, 231     http://            Nov. 27, 2015...............       080317
                                  (15[dash]08[dash]   Brookshire,         West 4th Avenue,   www.msc.fema.gov/
                                  0837P).             Mayor, City of      Severance, CO      lomc.
                                                      Severance, P.O.     80546.
                                                      Box 339,
                                                      Severance, CO
                                                      80546.
Florida:
    Broward....................  City of Pembroke    The Honorable       Environmental      http://            Nov. 12, 2015...............       120053
                                  Pines               Frank C. Ortis,     Services           www.msc.fema.gov/
                                  (15[dash]04[dash]   Mayor, City of      Division, 13975    lomc.
                                  4500P).             Pembroke Pines,     Pembroke Road,
                                                      10100 Pines         Pembroke Pines,
                                                      Boulevard,          FL 33027.
                                                      Pembroke Pines,
                                                      FL 33026.
    Charlotte..................  Unincorporated      The Honorable Ken   Charlotte County   http://            Dec. 1, 2015................       120061
                                  areas of            Doherty,            Community          www.msc.fema.gov/
                                  Charlotte County    Chairman,           Development        lomc.
                                  (15[dash]04[dash]   Charlotte County    Department,
                                  6067P).             Board of            18500 Murdock
                                                      Commissioners,      Circle, Port
                                                      18500 Murdock       Charlotte, FL
                                                      Circle, Port        33948.
                                                      Charlotte, FL
                                                      33948.
    Duval......................  City of             The Honorable       City Hall, 214     http://            Nov. 12, 2015...............       120077
                                  Jacksonville        Alvin Brown,        North Hogan        www.msc.fema.gov/
                                  (15[dash]04[dash]   Mayor, City of      Street, Suite      lomc.
                                  2570P).             Jacksonville, 117   2100,
                                                      West Duval          Jacksonville, FL
                                                      Street, Suite       32202.
                                                      400,
                                                      Jacksonville, FL
                                                      32202.

    Manatee....................  Town of Longboat    The Honorable Jack  Town Hall, 501     http://            Nov. 18, 2015...............       125126
                                  Key                 Duncan, Mayor,      Bay Isles Road,    www.msc.fema.gov/
                                  (15[dash]04[dash]   Town of Longboat    Longboat Key, FL   lomc.
                                  2751P).             Key, 501 Bay        34228.
                                                      Isles Road,
                                                      Longboat Key, FL
                                                      34228.
    St. Johns..................  Unincorporated      The Honorable       St. Johns County   http://            Nov. 19, 2015...............       125147
                                  areas of St.        James K. Johns,     Planning and       www.msc.fema.gov/
                                  Johns County        Commissioner, St.   Zoning             lomc.
                                  (15[dash]04[dash]   Johns County        Department, 4040
                                  5662P).             District 1, 500     Lewis Speedway,
                                                      San Sebastian       St. Augustine,
                                                      View, St.           FL 32084.
                                                      Augustine, FL
                                                      32084.
Georgia: Columbia                Unincorporated      The Honorable Ron   Columbia County    http://            Nov. 19, 2015...............       130059
                                  areas of Columbia   C. Cross,           Engineering        www.msc.fema.gov/
                                  County              Chairman,           Services           lomc.
                                  (15[dash]04[dash]   Columbia County     Department, 630
                                  4690P).             Board of            Ronald Reagan
                                                      Commissioners,      Drive, Building
                                                      P.O. Box 498,       A, Evans, GA
                                                      Evans, GA 30809.    30809.
Massachusetts: Barnstable        Town of Barnstable  The Honorable       Town Hall, 367     http://            Nov. 16, 2015...............       250001
                                  (15[dash]01[dash]   Jessica Rapp        Main Street,       www.msc.fema.gov/
                                  2052P).             Grassetti,          Hyannis, MA        lomc.
                                                      President, Town     02601.
                                                      of Barnstable
                                                      Council, 367 Main
                                                      Street, Hyannis,
                                                      MA 02601.
Montana:
    Powder River...............  Town of Broadus     The Honorable       Town Clerk's       http://            Jan. 20, 2016...............       300058
                                  (14-08-0420P).      Milton L. Amsden,   Office, P.O. Box   www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                      Mayor, City of      659, Broadus, MT   lomc.
                                                      Broadus, P.O. Box   59317.
                                                      659, Broadus, MT
                                                      59317.
    Powder River...............  Unincorporated      Mr. Darold Zimmer,  Powder River       http://            Jan. 20, 2016...............       300163
                                  areas of Powder     Chairman, Powder    County Clerk and   www.msc.fema.gov/
                                  River County (14-   River County        Recorder's         lomc.
                                  08-0420P).          Board of            Office, P.O. Box
                                                      Commissioners,      200, Broadus, MT
                                                      P.O. Box 200,       59317.
                                                      Broadus, MT 59317.
North Carolina: Northampton      Town of Gaston (15- The Honorable       Town Hall, 223     http://            Oct. 26, 2015...............       370413
                                  04-4075P).          Jason Moore,        Craige Street,     www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                      Mayor, Town of      Gaston, NC 27832.  lomc.
                                                      Gaston, 223
                                                      Craige Street,
                                                      Gaston, NC 27832.
Pennsylvania:
    Blair......................  City of Altoona     The Honorable Matt  Public Works       http://            Nov. 27, 2015...............       420159
                                  (14-03-3324P).      Pacifico, Mayor,    Department, 1301   www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                      City of Altoona,    12th Street,       lomc.
                                                      1301 12th Street,   Suite 300,
                                                      Suite 100,          Altoona, PA
                                                      Altoona, PA 16601.  16601.
    Blair......................  Township of Logan   Mr. James A.        Department of      http://            Nov. 27, 2015...............       421391
                                  (14-03-3324P).      Patterson,          Zoning, 100        www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                      Chairman,           Chief Logan        lomc.
                                                      Township of Logan   Circle, Altoona,
                                                      Board of            PA 16602.
                                                      Supervisors, 100
                                                      Chief Logan
                                                      Circle, Altoona,
                                                      PA 16602.
Texas:
    Collin.....................  City of Frisco (15- The Honorable       Engineering        http://            Dec. 7, 2015................       480134
                                  06-0486P).          Maher Maso,         Services           www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                      Mayor, City of      Department, 6101   lomc.
                                                      Frisco, 6101        Frisco Square
                                                      Frisco Square       Boulevard,
                                                      Boulevard,          Frisco, TX 75034.
                                                      Frisco, TX 75034.
    Dallas.....................  City of Dallas (14- The Honorable       Department of      http://            Nov. 30, 2015...............       480171
                                  06-3370P).          Michael S.          Public Works,      www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                      Rawlings, Mayor,    320 East           lomc.
                                                      City of Dallas,     Jefferson
                                                      1500 Marilla        Boulevard,
                                                      Street, Dallas,     Dallas, TX 75203.
                                                      TX 75201.
    Ellis......................  City of Waxahachie  The Honorable       City Hall, 401     http://            Dec. 2, 2015................       480211
                                  (15-06-0140P).      Kevin Strength,     South Rogers       www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                      Mayor, City of      Street,            lomc.
                                                      Waxahachie, 401     Waxahachie, TX
                                                      South Rogers        75165.
                                                      Street,
                                                      Waxahachie, TX
                                                      75165.
    Harris.....................  City of Houston     The Honorable       Floodplain         http://            Nov. 13, 2015...............       480296
                                  (15-06-0275P).      Annise D. Parker,   Management         www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                      Mayor, City of      Office, 1002       lomc.
                                                      Houston, P.O. Box   Washington
                                                      1562, Houston, TX   Avenue, 3rd
                                                      77251.              Floor, Houston,
                                                                          TX 77002.
    Harris.....................  Unincorporated      The Honorable Ed    Harris County      http://            Dec. 1, 2015................       480287
                                  areas of Harris     M. Emmett, Harris   Permit Office,     www.msc.fema.gov/
                                  County (15-06-      County Judge,       10555 Northwest    lomc.
                                  1550P).             1001 Preston        Freeway, Suite
                                                      Street, Suite       120, Houston, TX
                                                      911, Houston, TX    77092.
                                                      77002.
    Tarrant....................  City of Forest      The Honorable       City Hall, 3219    http://            Nov. 10, 2015...............       480595
                                  Hill (15-06-        Gerald Joubert,     California         www.msc.fema.gov/
                                  2903X).             Mayor, City of      Parkway, Forest    lomc.
                                                      Forest Hill, 3219   Hill, TX 76119.
                                                      California
                                                      Parkway, Forest
                                                      Hill, TX 76119.

    Tarrant....................  City of Fort Worth  The Honorable       City Hall, 1000    http://            Nov. 13, 2015...............       480596
                                  (15-06-0370P).      Betsy Price,        Throckmorton       www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                      Mayor, City of      Street, Fort       lomc.
                                                      Fort Worth, 1000    Worth, TX 76102.
                                                      Throckmorton
                                                      Street, Fort
                                                      Worth, TX 76102.
    Fort Bend..................  Unincorporated      The Honorable       Fort Bend County   http://            Nov. 13, 2015...............       480228
                                  areas of Fort       Robert E. Hebert,   Engineering        www.msc.fema.gov/
                                  Bend County (14-    Fort Bend County    Department, 301    lomc.
                                  06-2647P).          Judge, 401          Jackson Street,
                                                      Jackson Street,     4th Floor,
                                                      Richmond, TX        Richmond, TX
                                                      77469.              77469.
    Waller.....................  Unincorporated      The Honorable       Waller County      http://            Nov. 13, 2015...............       480640
                                  areas of Waller     Carbett J. Duhon    Emergency          www.msc.fema.gov/
                                  County (14-06-      III, Waller         Management         lomc.
                                  2647P).             County Judge, 836   Department, 701
                                                      Austin Street,      Calvit Street,
                                                      Suite 203,          Hempstead, TX
                                                      Hempstead, TX       77445.
                                                      77445.
Virginia: Independent City       City of Fairfax     The Honorable       Public Works       http://            Aug. 25, 2015...............       515524
                                  (14-03-2004P).      Robert Sisson,      Department,        www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                      Manager, City of    10455 Armstrong    lomc.
                                                      Fairfax, 10455      Street, Room
                                                      Armstrong Street,   200, Fairfax, VA
                                                      Room 316,           22030.
                                                      Fairfax, VA 22030.
Wisconsin:
    Fond du Lac................  Village of          The Honorable       Village Hall, 177  http://            Nov. 13, 2015...............       550133
                                  Campbellsport (14-  David Krebs,        East Main          www.msc.fema.gov/
                                  05-3087P).          President,          Street,            lomc.
                                                      Village of          Campbellsport,
                                                      Campbellsport       WI 53010.
                                                      Board of
                                                      Trustees, P.O.
                                                      Box 709,
                                                      Campbellsport, WI
                                                      53010.
    Fond du Lac................  Unincorporated      The Honorable       Fond du Lac        http://            Nov. 13, 2015...............       550131
                                  areas of Fond du    Allen Buechel,      County Code        www.msc.fema.gov/
                                  Lac County (14-05-  Fond du Lac         Enforcement        lomc.
                                  3087P).             County Executive,   Office, 160
                                                      160 South Macy      South Macy
                                                      Street, Fond du     Street, Fond du
                                                      Lac, WI 54935.      Lac, WI 54935.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2015-24496 Filed 9-25-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P