[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18237-18241]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08550]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 81 / Thursday, April 26, 2018 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0221; Airspace Docket No. 17-ANM-24]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment, Revocation, and Establishment of Multiple Air
Traffic Service (ATS) Routes; Western United States

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend three United States Area
Navigation (RNAV) Routes (T-274, T-276, T-302), remove one RNAV route
(T-304), and establish five RNAV routes (T-268, T-317, T-328, T-332, T-
355) in the western United States. The routes would promote operational
efficiencies for users and provide connectivity to current and proposed
RNAV enroute and terminal procedures.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 11, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; telephone: 1
(800) 647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2018-0221; Airspace Docket No. 17-ANM-24 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11B at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth Ready, Airspace Policy Group,
Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it would amend the route structure as necessary to support
the continuity of the airways within the National Airspace System.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2018-0221; Airspace Docket No. 17-ANM-24) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to FAA Docket No. FAA-2018-0221; Airspace Docket No. 17-ANM-24.'' The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified comment
closing date will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the comment
closing date. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the Western Service Center, Operations
Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA 98198.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11B, airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017, and effective
September 15, 2017. FAA Order 7400.11B is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this

document. FAA Order 7400.11B lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace
areas, air traffic service routes, and reporting points.

Background

    The Seattle, Salt Lake City, Oakland, Denver, and Minneapolis Air
Route Traffic Control Centers (ARTCCs) propose to amend three RNAV T-
routes, remove one RNAV T-route, and establish five new RNAV T-routes.
These RNAV routes will support the low altitude route structure in the
above listed ARTCCs airspace providing routes around congested
airspace, routing around special use airspace (SUA), lower minimum
enroute altitudes (MEAs) across mountainous terrain, provide
connectivity to instrument approach procedures (IAPs) at airports,
while minimizing traffic congestion within ARTCC and terminal control
airspaces.
    Additionally, FAA policy states even numbered route points are
listed west to east and odd numbered routes points are listed south to
north. Currently, route T-304 is an even numbered route extending north
and south. Due to this amendment the route is oriented south to north
which dictates a number change to an odd numbered route. Hence, the
reasoning for deletion of route T-304. This proposed amendment corrects
the numbering of the route and will be in line with current policy.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to amend United States RNAV routes T-274,
T-276, T-302; remove route T-304, and establish United States RNAV
routes T-268, T-317, T-328, T-332, T-355. The proposed route changes
are outlined below.
    T-268: T-268 would be established from the Tatooush, WA (TOU),
VORTAC to Bismarck, ND (BIS), VOR/DME. T-268 provides a route structure
around Seattle Class B airspace to the northwest extending east,
providing the lowest MEA across the Cascade Mountain Range, lower than
existing victor airways where icing conditions are prevalent. The
airway extends east through air traffic control terminal airspace
areas, borders the Powder River Military Operations Areas (MOAs) to the
north, and terminates in North Dakota.
    T-274: T-274 would be amended to provide a route across the Cascade
Mountain Range in central Oregon. Once east of the mountain range, it
provides a RNAV route between and past several MOAs, past Reno, Nevada
and terminating just prior to Los Angeles ARTCC airspace.
    T-276: T-276 would be amended to extend west to Ocean Shores, WA
and to the east, providing a route through the Columbia Gorge,
bordering the Boardman MOA to the north. The route continues east past
Walla Walla, WA, Missoula, Great Falls, and Lewistown, MT, bordering
the HAYS MOA to the east, terminating at Glasgow, MT.
    T-302: T-302 would be amended to extend to the southeast providing
an RNAV route bordering the JUNIPER and SADDLE MOAs. The route
continues past Boise, ID, and Twin Falls, ID, then southeast to Rock
Springs, WY. From Rock Springs, the route continues east, terminating
at LLUKY waypoint south of LAKEANDES MOA in Nebraska. This route
provides connectivity to terminal instrument approach procedures at
several airports.
    T-304: T-304 would be removed.
    T-317: T-317 would be established from the Newman, TX (EWM), VORTAC
to Astoria, OR (AST), VOR/DME. T-317 will provide an RNAV route
replacing portions of V-187, which was affected by the discontinuance
of the McChord VORTAC.
    T-328: T-328 would be established from the ORCUS, WA, fix to the
KARSH, MT, fix. T-328 is a new airway that provides a route across the
Cascade Mountain Range in northern Washington state where no low
altitude airways exist today. This route borders the Okanogan MOA to
the south, providing a safe route around the airspace. The airway
borders the Spokane terminal airspace and connects with instrument
approach procedures, providing a seamless transition from enroute to
the landing phase of flight.
    T-332: T-332 would be established from the ZONUV, WA, waypoint to
the ROZTY, WA, waypoint. T-332 is a new route across the Cascade
Mountain Range in northern Washington state. This route is a shorter
route through the Okanogan MOA, to be used when released for joint use.
This route provides an MEA of 10,700 feet, which is 1,000 feet lower
than another route to the south. This route saves over 60 flying miles
to get to a low MEA across the mountain range where icing conditions
are prevalent.
    T-355: T-355 would be established to extend south and north of the
previous airway T-304, thus replacing the original west to east T-304
airway. T-355 will extend north and south of the original T-304 route
to provide greater utility for air traffic. The route provides
crossings of the Cascade Mountain Range and provides for connectivity
to terminal areas in the Bend and Medford, Oregon airports. On the
south end, the route links to the existing T-263. To the north it
provides a route west of Seattle Class B airspace to Bellingham, WA,
and the Canadian border.
    United States Area Navigation Routes are published in paragraph
6011 of FAA Order 7400.11B dated August 3, 2017, and effective
September 15, 2017, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1.
The United States Area Navigation Routes listed in this document will
be subsequently published in the Order.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this proposed rule,
when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11B,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017 and
effective September 15, 2017, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6011--United States Area Navigation Routes.

T-268 TATOOSH, WA (TOU) to BISMARCK, ND (BIS) [New]
TATOOSH, WA (TOU)...........  VORTAC..............  (lat. 48[deg]17'59.64'' N, long. 124[deg]37'37.36'' W)
HEMER, WA...................  WP..................  (lat. 48[deg]21'52.95'' N, long. 124[deg]23'26.86'' W)
YUCSU, WA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 48[deg]11'20.81'' N, long. 123[deg]54'25.64'' W)
WATTR, WA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 48[deg]08'21.35'' N, long. 122[deg]56'27.97'' W)
WOODI, WA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 47[deg]46'07.46'' N, long. 121[deg]51'47.70'' W)
BANDR, WA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 47[deg]15'30.14'' N, long. 121[deg]29'32.11'' W)
MERFF, WA...................  WP..................  (lat. 47[deg]02'12.58'' N, long. 120[deg]27'28.25'' W)
MOSES LAKE, WA (MWH)........  VOR/DME.............  (lat. 47[deg]12'39.11'' N, long. 119[deg]19'00.54'' W)
SPOKANE, WA (GEG)...........  VORTAC..............  (lat. 47[deg]33'53.80'' N, long. 117[deg]37'36.79'' W)
MULLAN PASS, ID (MLP).......  VOR/DME.............  (lat. 47[deg]27'24.85'' N, long. 115[deg]38'45.76'' W)
MISSOULA, MT (MSO)..........  VOR/DME.............  (lat. 46[deg]54'28.68'' N, long. 114[deg]05'01.15'' W)
HELENA, MT (HLN)............  VORTAC..............  (lat. 46[deg]36'24.56'' N, long. 111[deg]57'12.51'' W)
CONNS, MT...................  FIX.................  (lat. 46[deg]16'06.81'' N, long. 111[deg]04'55.70'' W)
NUKUW, MT...................  FIX.................  (lat. 46[deg]04'09.77'' N, long. 110[deg]51'18.39'' W)
SUBKY, MT...................  FIX.................  (lat. 45[deg]44'00.60'' N, long. 109[deg]57'37.27'' W)
BILLINGS, MT (BIL)..........  VORTAC..............  (lat. 45[deg]48'30.81'' N, long. 108[deg]37'28.73'' W)
MILES CITY, MT (MLS)........  VOR/DME.............  (lat. 46[deg]22'56.02'' N, long. 105[deg]57'12.72'' W)
DICKINSON, ND (DIK).........  VORTAC..............  (lat. 46[deg]51'36.14'' N, long. 102[deg]46'24.60'' W)
BISMARCK, ND (BIS)..........  VOR/DME.............  (lat. 46[deg]45'42.34'' N, long. 100[deg]39'55.47'' W)

* * * * *

T-274 NEWPORT, OR (ONP) to LIDAT, NV [Amended]
NEWPORT, OR (ONP)...........  VORTAC..............  (lat. 44[deg]34'31.26'' N, long. 124[deg]03'38.14'' W)
WESHH, OR...................  WP..................  (lat. 44[deg]38'50.00'' N, long. 123[deg]35'32.35'' W)
CRAAF, OR...................  FIX.................  (lat. 44[deg]45'37.17'' N, long. 123[deg]21'05.90'' W)
JAIME, OR...................  FIX.................  (lat. 44[deg]25'07.17'' N, long. 122[deg]36'28.01'' W)
MMASN, OR...................  WP..................  (lat. 44[deg]21'15.22'' N, long. 121[deg]15'36.06'' W)
FASAB, OR...................  WP..................  (lat. 42[deg]23'22.00'' N, long. 120[deg]23'51.65'' W)
NUSME, CA...................  WP..................  (lat. 41[deg]53'43.18'' N, long. 120[deg]20'35.71'' W)
RUFUS, CA...................  WP..................  (lat. 41[deg]26'00.00'' N, long. 120[deg]00'00.00'' W)
MUSTANG, NV (FMG)...........  VORTAC..............  (lat. 39[deg]31'52.60'' N, long. 119[deg]39'21.87'' W)
COALDALE, NV (OAL)..........  VORTAC..............  (lat. 38[deg]00'11.74'' N, long. 117[deg]46'13.61'' W)
LIDAT, NV...................  FIX.................  (lat. 37[deg]25'48.67'' N, long. 117[deg]16'41.00'' W)

* * * * *

T-276 WAVLU, WA to GLASGOW, MT (GGW) [Amended]
WAVLU, WA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 46[deg]50'00.90'' N, long. 124[deg]06'35.70'' W)
WINLO, WA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 46[deg]27'27.26'' N, long. 123[deg]06'03.90'' W)
COUGA, WA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 46[deg]05'31.23'' N, long. 122[deg]40'38.59'' W)
CARBY, WA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 45[deg]44'05.96'' N, long. 121[deg]55'31.67'' W)
VECCU, WA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 45[deg]40'53.27'' N, long. 120[deg]52'00.64'' W)
WALLA WALLA, WA (ALW).......  VOR/DME.............  (lat. 46[deg]05'13.11'' N, long. 118[deg]17'33.13'' W)
RENGO, WA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 46[deg]20'08.16'' N, long. 117[deg]50'42.07'' W)
HENVO, ID...................  WP..................  (lat. 46[deg]19'48.06'' N, long. 116[deg]37'33.04'' W)
OFINO, ID...................  FIX.................  (lat. 46[deg]31'19.36'' N, long. 116[deg]09'54.90'' W)
FRYMN, MT...................  FIX.................  (lat. 47[deg]17'32.40'' N, long. 111[deg]38'36.84'' W)
YOGOS, MT...................  FIX.................  (lat. 47[deg]19'30.51'' N, long. 110[deg]49'37.75'' W)
EVBUJ, MT...................  WP..................  (lat. 47[deg]03'09.79'' N, long. 109[deg]44'19.14'' W)
ITEVE, MT...................  WP..................  (lat. 47[deg]02'12.69'' N, long. 109[deg]10'20.79'' W)
WUDEY, MT...................  WP..................  (lat. 47[deg]20'13.56'' N, long. 106[deg]56'58.95'' W)
GLASGOW, MT (GGW)...........  VOR/DME.............  (lat. 48[deg]12'55.10'' N, long. 106[deg]37'31.51'' W)

* * * * *

T-302 CUKIS, OR to LLUKY, NE [Amended]
CUKIS, OR...................  WP..................  (lat. 45[deg]20'59.59'' N, long. 122[deg]21'49.41'' W)
CUPRI, OR...................  FIX.................  (lat. 44[deg]37'03.76'' N, long. 121[deg]15'13.89'' W)
WILDHORSE, OR (ILR).........  VOR/DME.............  (lat. 43[deg]35'35.27'' N, long. 118[deg]57'18.18'' W)
JOSTN, OR...................  WP..................  (lat. 43[deg]34'16.92'' N, long. 117[deg]53'51.34'' W)
PARMO, ID...................  FIX.................  (lat. 43[deg]45'32.78'' N, long. 116[deg]49'10.43'' W)
TOXEE, ID...................  FIX.................  (lat. 42[deg]41'41.81'' N, long. 114[deg]27'13.10'' W)
JADUP, ID...................  WP..................  (lat. 42[deg]44'32.00'' N, long. 113[deg]42'15.22'' W)
ROCK SPRINGS, WY (OCS)......  VOR/DME.............  (lat. 41[deg]35'24.76'' N, long. 109[deg]00'55.18'' W)

FIKLA, WY...................  WP..................  (lat. 41[deg]56'20.50'' N, long. 106[deg]57'11.03'' W)
MEDICINE BOW, WY (MBW)......  VOR/DME.............  (lat. 41[deg]50'43.88'' N, long. 106[deg]00'15.42'' W)
SCOTTSBLUFF, NE (BFF).......  VORTAC..............  (lat. 41[deg]53'38.99'' N, long. 103[deg]28'55.31'' W)
WAKPA, NE...................  WP..................  (lat. 42[deg]03'21.64'' N, long. 103[deg]04'57.99'' W)
ALLIANCE, NE (AIA)..........  VOR/DME.............  (lat. 42[deg]03'20.27'' N, long. 102[deg]48'16.00'' W)
MARSS, NE...................  FIX.................  (lat. 42[deg]27'48.92'' N, long. 100[deg]36'15.32'' W)
PUKFA, NE...................  WP..................  (lat. 42[deg]22'59.52'' N, long. 099[deg]59'36.42'' W)
GIYED, NE...................  FIX.................  (lat. 42[deg]30'22.02'' N, long. 099[deg]08'05.55'' W)
LLUKY, NE...................  WP..................  (lat. 42[deg]29'20.26'' N, long. 098[deg]38'11.44'' W)

* * * * *
    T-304 GLARA, OR to HERBS, OR [Removed]

* * * * *

T-317 NEWMAN, TX (EWM) to ASTORIA, OR (AST) [New]
NEWMAN, TX (EWM)............  VORTAC..............  (lat. 31[deg]57'06.28'' N, long. 106[deg]16'20.64'' W)
MOLLY, NM...................  FIX.................  (lat. 32[deg]03'47.91'' N, long. 106[deg]43'27.24'' W)
TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES, NM     VORTAC..............  (lat. 33[deg]16'57.01'' N, long. 107[deg]16'49.97'' W)
 (TCS).
SOCORRO, NM (ONM)...........  VORTAC..............  (lat. 34[deg]20'20.04'' N, long. 106[deg]49'13.69'' W)
YECUG, NM...................  WP..................  (lat. 34[deg]59'18.02'' N, long. 106[deg]59'58.00'' W)
AWASH, NM...................  FIX.................  (lat. 35[deg]16'35.44'' N, long. 106[deg]59'15.33'' W)
RATTLESNAKE, NM (RSK).......  VORTAC..............  (lat. 36[deg]44'54.21'' N, long. 108[deg]05'56.04'' W)
GRAND JUNCTION, CO (JNC)....  VOR/DME.............  (lat. 39[deg]03'34.44'' N, long. 108[deg]47'33.27'' W)
ROCK SPRINGS, WY (OCS)......  VOR/DME.............  (lat. 41[deg]35'24.76'' N, long. 109[deg]00'55.18'' W)
SWEAT, WY...................  FIX.................  (lat. 42[deg]26'35.02'' N, long. 108[deg]27'10.31'' W)
RIVERTON, WY (RIW)..........  VOR/DME.............  (lat. 43[deg]03'56.63'' N, long. 108[deg]27'19.92'' W)
FETIK, WY...................  FIX.................  (lat. 43[deg]17'24.59'' N, long. 108[deg]22'03.98'' W)
BILLINGS, MT (BIL)..........  VORTAC..............  (lat. 45[deg]48'30.81'' N, long. 108[deg]37'28.73'' W)
ZERZO, MT...................  FIX.................  (lat. 46[deg]52'25.99'' N, long. 110[deg]05'08.51'' W)
GREAT FALLS, MT (GTF).......  VORTAC..............  (lat. 47[deg]26'59.93'' N, long. 111[deg]24'43.79'' W)
MISSOULA, MT (MSO)..........  VOR/DME.............  (lat. 46[deg]54'28.68'' N, long. 114[deg]05'01.15'' W)
NEZ PERCE, ID (MQG).........  VOR/DME.............  (lat. 46[deg]22'53.61'' N, long. 116[deg]52'10.24'' W)
PASCO, WA (PSC).............  VOR/DME.............  (lat. 46[deg]16'12.96'' N, long. 119[deg]07'02.27'' W)
MERFF, WA...................  WP..................  (lat. 47[deg]02'12.58'' N, long. 120[deg]27'28.25'' W)
MOUNT, WA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 47[deg]06'19.17'' N, long. 121[deg]54'17.49'' W)
FESAS, WA...................  WP..................  (lat. 47[deg]05'13.84'' N, long. 122[deg]44'00.62'' W)
ASTORIA, OR (AST)...........  VOR/DME.............  (lat. 46[deg]09'42.11'' N, long. 123[deg]52'49.36'' W)

* * * * *

T-328 ORCUS, WA to KARSH, MT [New]
ORCUS, WA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 48[deg]20'39.54'' N, long. 123[deg]07'44.01'' W)
BOCAT, WA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 48[deg]20'32.01'' N, long. 122[deg]09'44.74'' W)
CREEB, WA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 48[deg]13'00.00'' N, long. 121[deg]20'24.00'' W)
ROZSE, WA...................  WP..................  (lat. 48[deg]13'22.57'' N, long. 121[deg]01'45.71'' W)
KRUZR, WA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 48[deg]04'38.90'' N, long. 120[deg]34'40.72'' W)
SINGG, WA...................  WP..................  (lat. 47[deg]59'30.00'' N, long. 119[deg]00'00.00'' W)
ROZTY, WA...................  WP..................  (lat. 48[deg]03'46.12'' N, long. 117[deg]56'38.05'' W)
PRRKS, WA...................  WP..................  (lat. 48[deg]08'48.19'' N, long. 117[deg]31'08.00'' W)
DAINA, WA...................  WP..................  (lat. 48[deg]08'43.44'' N, long. 117[deg]07'27.78'' W)
INOBE, ID...................  FIX.................  (lat. 48[deg]04'54.58'' N, long. 116[deg]45'47.03'' W)
KKARP, ID...................  WP..................  (lat. 48[deg]10'18.56'' N, long. 116[deg]14'21.48'' W)
KARSH, MT...................  WP..................  (lat. 48[deg]08'52.72'' N, long. 115[deg]07'55.44'' W)

* * * * *

T-332 ZONUV, WA to ROZTY, WA [New]
ZONUV, WA...................  WP..................  (lat. 48[deg]34'10.29'' N, long. 122[deg]44'14.63'' W)
CRNEL, WA...................  WP..................  (lat. 48[deg]28'19.45'' N, long. 122[deg]13'20.64'' W)
AALIX, WA...................  WP..................  (lat. 48[deg]30'15.89'' N, long. 121[deg]45'22.85'' W)
BAALE, WA...................  WP..................  (lat. 48[deg]26'42.58'' N, long. 121[deg]24'56.40'' W)
SNNDY, WA...................  WP..................  (lat. 48[deg]22'51.69'' N, long. 121[deg]12'38.31'' W)
METOO, WA...................  WP..................  (lat. 48[deg]22'59.81'' N, long. 120[deg]07'42.05'' W)
ROZTY, WA...................  WP..................  (lat. 48[deg]03'46.12'' N, long. 117[deg]56'38.05'' W)

* * * * *

T-355 FOLDS, CA to SECOG, WA [New]
FOLDS, CA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 40[deg]44'16.56'' N, long. 122[deg]30'10.69'' W)

GRENA, CA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 41[deg]43'31.31'' N, long. 122[deg]29'09.72'' W)
TALEM, OR...................  FIX.................  (lat. 42[deg]08'49.70'' N, long. 122[deg]52'41.50'' W)
SAMIE, OR...................  FIX.................  (lat. 42[deg]38'46.29'' N, long. 123[deg]00'57.97'' W)
BROKN, OR...................  FIX.................  (lat. 42[deg]45'37.47'' N, long. 122[deg]57'53.29'' W)
SSTRS, OR...................  WP..................  (lat. 43[deg]40'36.47'' N, long. 121[deg]34'47.27'' W)
HERBS, OR...................  FIX.................  (lat. 44[deg]25'07.23'' N, long. 121[deg]16'51.75'' W)
JJETT, OR...................  WP..................  (lat. 44[deg]56'35.43'' N, long. 121[deg]40'56.36'' W)
CANBY, OR...................  FIX.................  (lat. 45[deg]18'38.05'' N, long. 122[deg]45'53.61'' W)
QAARY, OR...................  WP..................  (lat. 46[deg]07'56.92'' N, long. 123[deg]29'25.62'' W)
WUMOX, WA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 47[deg]35'07.83'' N, long. 122[deg]40'26.84'' W)
ZONUV, WA...................  WP..................  (lat. 48[deg]34'10.29'' N, long. 122[deg]44'14.63'' W)
SECOG, WA...................  FIX.................  (lat. 48[deg]59'42.80'' N, long. 122[deg]32'17.97'' W)

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 18, 2018.
Rodger A. Dean Jr.,
Manager, Airspace Policy Group.
[FR Doc. 2018-08550 Filed 4-25-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: December 15, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 241)]
[Notices]
[Page 75525-75526]
[DOCID:fr15de06-52]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-101-000]

Enbridge Offshore Pipelines (UTOS) L.L.C.; Notice of Petition

December 8, 2006.
    Take notice that on December 7, 2006, Enbridge Offshore Pipelines
(UTOS) L.L.C. (UTOS), pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207(a)(5) (2006), has
petitioned the Commission to issue an order approving a proposed rate
settlement that would extend the term of the existing UTOS rate
settlement approved by the Commission in Docket No. RP03-335 for three
years after the date of a final, non-appealable Commission order
approving the proposed settlement without conditions unacceptable to
UTOS. The proposed settlement would not modify any other rates, terms
or conditions of the existing settlement.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to

receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-21394 Filed 12-14-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: September 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 170)]
[Notices]
[Page 53963]
[DOCID:fr02se10-48]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13723-000]

 Iron Mask Hydro, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Competing Applications

August 27, 2010.
    On May 6, 2010, Iron Mask Hydro, LLC filed an application for a
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act
(FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of the Iron Mask Pumped
Storage Project to be located near the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's
Canyon Ferry Lake in the vicinity of Townsend, Montana, in Broadwater
County, Montana. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued,
is to grant the permit holder priority to file a license application
during the permit term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the
permit holder to perform any land-disturbing activities or otherwise
enter upon lands or waters owned by others without the owners' express
permission.
    The proposed project will consist of the following: (1) A 225-foot-
high, 1,795-foot-long upper dam made of either zoned earth and rockfill
or concrete-face earth and rockfill; (2) a 50-foot-high, 950-foot-long
earth-filled upper saddle dike A; (3) a 20-foot-high, 400-foot-long
earth-filled upper saddle dike B; (4) a 40-foot-high, 6,559-foot-long
lower embankment made of zoned earth or rockfill; (5) an upper
reservoir with a storage capacity of 4,888 acre-feet; (6) a lower
reservoir with a storage capacity of 4,888 acre-feet; (7) a 1,626-foot-
long, 12.9-foot-diameter unlined upper low-pressure tunnel; (8) a
4,809-foot-long, 12.9-foot-diameter unlined, concrete-lined, and steel-
lined pressure shaft; (9) a 200-foot-long, 12.9-foot-diameter concrete-
lined and steel-lined high pressure tunnel; (10) four 6.5-foot-diameter
steel-lined penstocks (length to be determined) ; (11) a 5,073-foot-
long, 15.5-foot-diameter concrete-lined or unlined tailrace; (12) a
260-foot-long, 65-foot-wide, 120-foot-high underground powerhouse
located at a depth of 1,000 feet; (13) one 150-megawatt (MW), one 100-
MW, and one 50-MW reversible pump-turbines totaling 300 MW of
generating capacity, with up to 100 MW of additional pumping capacity,
for a total of 400 MW pumping capacity; (14) an approximately 3,000-
foot-long, 24-foot-high main access tunnel leading from the ground
level to the powerhouse; and (15) a new single-circuit 230-kilovolt,
4.9-mile-long transmission line with a 150-foot right of way.
    Annual energy production is estimated to be 919,800 megawatt hours.
    Applicant Contact: Matthew Shapiro, CEO, Gridflex Energy, LLC, 1210
W. Franklin Street, Ste. 2, Boise, ID 83702; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Kelly Wolcott<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and
competing applications may be filed electronically via the Internet.
See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's
Web site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-
filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support. Although the Commission strongly encourages electronic filing,
documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an original and
seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-13723-000) in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-21969 Filed 9-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 43710]
[FR Doc No: 2016-15788]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2016-0074]

Denial of Motor Vehicle Defect Petition

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Denial of petition for a defect investigation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the reasons for the denial of a
petition submitted to NHTSA under 49 U.S.C. 30162, requesting that the
agency commence a proceeding to determine the existence of a defect
related to motor vehicle safety in 2015 and 2016 Shasta Airflyte
recreational vehicles. After a review of the petition and other
information, NHTSA has concluded that all but one of the issues
identified in the petition have been addressed through one of three
other remedial actions. The one issue not addressed by another action
was found not to represent an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle
safety. The agency accordingly has denied the petition. The petition is
hereinafter identified as DP15-008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Nate Seymour, Medium & Heavy Duty
Vehicle Division, Office of Defects Investigation (ODI), NHTSA, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590. Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By letter dated September 1, 2015, Mrs. Amy
Green wrote to NHTSA requesting that the agency investigate eleven (11)
issues identified in her letter.
    NHTSA has reviewed the material provided by the petitioners and
other pertinent data the agency gathered. The results of this review
and NHTSA's analysis of the petition's merit is set forth in the DP15-
008 Evaluation Report, appearing in the public docket referenced in the
heading of this notice.
    Forest River has recalled four (4) of the eleven (11) issues. One
issue was addressed with a Technical Service Bulletin (TSB), five (5)
were addressed in a consent order issued July 8, 2015 and it is
unlikely that an order concerning notification and remedy of a safety-
related defect would be issued as a result of granting Mrs. Amy Green's
request for the one remaining issue. Therefore, an investigation into
the issues raised by the petition does not appear to be warranted and
the petition is denied.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30162(d); delegations of authority at CFR
1.95 and 501.8.

Gregory K. Rea,
Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2016-15788 Filed 7-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


	ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

	40 CFR Part 52

	[EPA-R03-OAR-2009-0599; FRL-       ]

	Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;

	Virginia; Revision to Clean Air Interstate Rule Sulfur Dioxide Trading
Program

AGENCY:	Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION:	Final rule.

SUMMARY:  EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia.  The revision pertains to the
timing for the first phase of the sulfur dioxide (SO2) trading budget
under the Commonwealth’s approved regulations that implement the
requirements of the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR).  EPA is approving
this revision to change the start date of Virginia’s CAIR SO2 trading
budget from the control period in 2009 to the control period in 2010 in
accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

EFFECTIVE DATE:  This final rule is effective on [insert date 30 days
from date of publication].

ADDRESSES:  EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR--2009-0599.  All documents in the docket are listed
in the www.regulations.gov website.   Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.  Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form.  Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State
submittal are available at the Virginia Department of Environmental
Quality, 629 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia, 23219.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marilyn Powers,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I.	Background

Throughout this document, whenever “we,” “us,” or “our” is
used, we mean EPA.

On January 14, 2009, the Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a formal
revision to its SIP.  The SIP revision consists of a change in timing
for the first phase of the Commonwealth’s approved CAIR SO2 trading
budget.  The start for the first phase of the SO2 trading budget is
changed from the control period in 2009 to the control period in 2010.

On October 22, 2009 (74 FR 54485), EPA published a Direct Final Rule
(DFRN) to approve the January 14, 2009 SIP revision submitted by the
Commonwealth of Virginia.  On October 26, 2009, EPA received a comment,
and on November 23, 2009 (74 FR 61037), EPA withdrew the DFRN and noted
that the comment would be addressed in a final action based on the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) published on October 22, 2009 (74 FR
545344).  The comment period closed on November 23, 2009.  No additional
comments were received.

Comment:  An anonymous commenter submitted the comment:  "I am not sure
about this rule."

Response:  The comment, while vaguely expressing a general uncertainty
about the rule, does not identify any particular defect in the rule
substance or adoption.  Importantly, the comment does not oppose EPA’s
proposed full approval of the rule.  EPA therefore believes that no
additional response is necessary.

II.      Summary of SIP Revision

Virginia regulation 9 VAC 5-140-3400 originally required that the
Commonwealth’s CAIR SO2 budget applied starting with the control
period in 2009.  However, the EPA-administered CAIR SO2 trading programs
under States’ CAIR SIPs and under the CAIR FIP start on January 1,
2010, and the associated CAIR SO2 trading budgets apply starting with
the 2010 control period.  To make the Virginia CAIR SO2 trading program
requirements consistent with the regional trading program requirements,
Virginia revised regulation 9 VAC- 5-140-3400 to change this date from
2009 to 2010.  In the SIP revision, Virginia explains that this change
corrects a technical error  in its approved CAIR SIP.  The SIP revision
also includes a clarifying revision to the description of the State’s
SO2 budget.

III.    General Information Pertaining to SIP Submittals from the
Commonwealth of Virgina

In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation that provides, subject to certain
conditions, for an environmental assessment (audit) “privilege” for
voluntary compliance evaluations performed by a regulated entity.  The
legislation further addresses the relative burden of proof for parties
either asserting the privilege or seeking disclosure of documents for
which the privilege is claimed.  Virginia's legislation also provides,
subject to certain conditions, for a penalty waiver for violations of
environmental laws when a regulated entity discovers such violations
pursuant to a voluntary compliance evaluation and voluntarily discloses
such violations to the Commonwealth and takes prompt and appropriate
measures to remedy the violations.  Virginia's Voluntary Environmental
Assessment Privilege Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1198, provides a privilege
that protects from disclosure documents and information about the
content of those documents that are the product of a voluntary
environmental assessment. The Privilege Law does not extend to documents
or information (1) that are generated or developed before the
commencement of a voluntary environmental assessment; (2) that are
prepared independently of the assessment process; (3) that demonstrate a
clear, imminent and substantial danger to the public health or
environment; or (4) that are required by law.

On January 12, 1998, the Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the Attorney
General provided a legal opinion that states that the Privilege law, Va.
Code Sec. 10.1-1198,  precludes granting a privilege to documents and
information “required by law,” including documents and information
“required by Federal law to maintain program delegation, authorization
or approval,” since Virginia must (enforce Federally authorized
environmental programs in a manner that is no less stringent than their
Federal counterparts. . . .”   The opinion concludes that
“[r]egarding ( 10.1-1198, therefore, documents or other information
needed for civil or criminal enforcement under one of these programs
could not be privileged because such documents and information are
essential to pursuing enforcement in a manner required by Federal law to
maintain program delegation, authorization or approval.”

Virginia's Immunity law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1199, provides that “[t]o
the extent consistent with requirements imposed by Federal law,”  any
person making a voluntary disclosure of information to a state agency
regarding a violation of an environmental statute, regulation, permit,
or administrative order is granted immunity from administrative or civil
penalty.  The Attorney General's January 12, 1998 opinion states that
the quoted language renders this statute inapplicable to enforcement of
any Federally authorized programs, since “no immunity could be
afforded from administrative, civil, or criminal penalties because
granting such immunity would not be consistent with Federal law, which
is one of the criteria for immunity.”

Therefore, EPA has determined that Virginia's Privilege and Immunity
statutes will not preclude the Commonwealth from enforcing its program
consistent with the Federal requirements.  In any event, because EPA has
also determined that a state audit privilege and immunity law can affect
only state enforcement and cannot have any impact on Federal enforcement
authorities, EPA may at any time invoke its authority under the CAA,
including, for example, sections 113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to enforce
the requirements or prohibitions of the state plan, independently of any
state enforcement effort.  In addition, citizen enforcement under
section 304 of the Clean Air Act is likewise unaffected by this, or any,
state audit privilege or immunity law.

IV.	Final Action

EPA is approving the SIP revision submitted by the Commonwealth of
Virginia on January 14, 2009.  The SIP revision incorporates a timing
change to the Commonwealth’s CAIR SO2 trading program that make it
consistent with the regional CAIR SO2 trading program, under which SO2
trading budgets apply starting in 2010, as well as a clarifying revision
to the description of the State’s SO2 budget.

V.   Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A.   General Requirements

Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations.  42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).  Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.  Accordingly,
this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by
state law.  For that reason, this action:

is not a "significant regulatory action” subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993);

does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);

is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);

does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);

does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order
13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997);

is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211
(66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the
Clean Air Act; and

does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects,
using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP
is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA
notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.

B.   Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the
rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to
each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United
States.  EPA will submit a report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register.  A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register.
 This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

C.  Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial
review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of
Appeals for the appropriate circuit by [Insert date 60 days from date of
publication of this document in the Federal Register].  Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action.

This action to approve a revision to Virginia’s CAIR SO2 Trading
Program may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements.  (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Sulfur oxides.

          W. C. Early, Acting

           Regional Administrator

___February 18, 2010___
___________________________

Dated:                            				Shawn M. Garvin,

							Regional Administrator,

							EPA Region III.

40 CFR Part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52 - [AMENDED]

1.  The authority citation for 40 CFR part 52 continues to read as
follows:

               Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart VV ( Virginia

2.  In ( 52.2420, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising the
entry for Chapter 140, Section 5-140-3400 to read as follows:

( 52.2420  	Identification of plan.

*	*	*	*	*

 (c) * * *

	EPA-APPROVED VIRGINIA REGULATIONS AND STATUTES

State citation     	Title/subject	State effective date	EPA approval date
Explanation [former SIP citation]

*     *     *     *     *    *     *

9 VAC 5, Chapter 140	Regulations for Emissions Trading Programs

*     *     *     *     *    *     *

Part IV	SO2 Annual Trading Program

*     *     *     *     *    *     *

5-140-3400	State trading budgets	12/12/07	[Insert Federal Register
publication date] [Insert page number where the document begins]	1.  In
section title, replace “State” with “CAIR SO2 Annual”

2.  In paragraph 1, replace 2009 with 2010.

*     *     *     *     *    *     *

*    *     *     *      *

 PAGE

 PAGE  3