[Federal Register: October 30, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 209)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 56153-56166]
[DOCID:fr30oc09-26]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

46 CFR Part 401

[Docket No. USCG-2009-0883]
RIN 1625-AB39

Great Lakes Pilotage Rates--2010 Annual Review and Adjustment

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to update the rates for pilotage on
the Great Lakes by 5.07% to generate sufficient revenue to cover
allowable expenses, target pilot compensation, and return on
investment. The proposed update reflects an August 1, 2010 increase in
benchmark contractual wages and benefits and an adjustment for
inflation. This rulemaking promotes the Coast Guard strategic goal of
maritime safety.

DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Docket Management
Facility on or before November 30, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG-2009-0883 to the Docket Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid duplication, please use only one
of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions on this proposed rule,
call Mr. Paul M. Wasserman, Chief, Great Lakes Pilotage Branch,
Commandant (CG-54122), U.S. Coast Guard, at<PHONE_NUMBER>, by fax 202-
372-1929, or by e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee
V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
    A. Submitting Comments
    B. Viewing Comments and Documents
    C. Privacy Act
    D. Public Meeting
II. Abbreviations
III. Background and Purpose
IV. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
V. Regulatory Analyses
    A. Regulatory Planning and Review
    B. Small Entities
    C. Assistance for Small Entities
    D. Collection of Information
    E. Federalism
    F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
    G. Taking of Private Property
    H. Civil Justice Reform
    I. Protection of Children
    J. Indian Tribal Governments
    K. Energy Effects
    L. Technical Standards
    M. Environment

I. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. We have an agreement with the
Department of Transportation to use the Docket Management Facility.

A. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, (USCG-2009-0883), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use only one of
these means. We recommend that you include your name and a mailing
address, an e-mail address, or a phone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2009-0883'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope.
    We will consider all comments and material received during the
comment period and may change this proposed rule based on your
comments.

B. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2009-0883'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
If you do not have access to the internet, you may view the docket
online by visiting the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.

C. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments received into
any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act system of
records notice regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008
issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

D. Public Meeting

    We do not plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that
one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

II. Abbreviations

AMOU American Maritime Officers Union
MISLE Marine Information for Safety and Law Enforcement
NAICS North American Industry Classification System

NEPA National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
NVMC National Vessel Movement Center
OMB Office of Management and Budget

III. Background and Purpose

    This notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) is issued pursuant to
Coast Guard regulations in 46 CFR Parts 401-404. Those regulations
implement the Great Lakes Pilotage Act of 1960, 46 U.S.C. Chapter 93,
which requires foreign-flag vessels and U.S.-flag vessels engaged in
foreign trade to use federally registered Great Lakes pilots while
transiting the St. Lawrence Seaway and the Great Lakes system, and
which requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to ``prescribe by
regulation rates and charges for pilotage services, giving
consideration to the public interest and the costs of providing the
services.'' 46 U.S.C. 9303(f).
    The U.S. waters of the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence Seaway are
divided into three pilotage Districts. Pilotage in each District is
provided by an association certified by the Coast Guard Director of
Great Lakes Pilotage to operate a pilotage pool. It is important to
note that, while the Coast Guard sets rates, it does not control the
actual compensation that pilots receive. This is determined by each of
the three District associations, which use different compensation
practices.
    District One, consisting of Areas 1 and 2, includes all U.S. waters
of the St. Lawrence River and Lake Ontario. District Two, consisting of
Areas 4 and 5, includes all U.S. waters of Lake Erie, the Detroit
River, Lake St. Clair, and the St. Clair River. District Three,
consisting of Areas 6, 7, and 8, includes all U.S. waters of the St.
Mary's River, Sault Ste. Marie Locks, and Lakes Michigan, Huron, and
Superior. Area 3 is the Welland Canal, which is serviced exclusively by
the Canadian Great Lakes Pilotage Authority and, accordingly, is not
included in the U.S. rate structure. Areas 1, 5, and 7 have been
designated by Presidential Proclamation, pursuant to the Great Lakes
Pilotage Act of 1960, to be waters in which pilots must at all times be
fully engaged in the navigation of vessels in their charge. Areas 2, 4,
6, and 8 have not been so designated because they are open bodies of
water. Under the Great Lakes Pilotage Act of 1960, pilots assigned to
vessels in these areas are only required to ``be on board and available
to direct the navigation of the vessel at the discretion of and subject
to the customary authority of the master.'' 46 U.S.C. 9302(a)(1)(B).
    The Coast Guard pilotage regulations require annual reviews of
pilotage rates and the setting of new rates at least once every five
years, or sooner, if annual reviews show a need. 46 CFR 404.1. To
assist in calculating pilotage rates, the pilotage associations are
required to submit to the Coast Guard annual financial statements
prepared by certified public accounting firms. In addition, every fifth
year, in connection with the mandatory rate adjustment, the Coast Guard
contracts with an independent accounting firm to conduct a full audit
of the accounts and records of the pilotage associations and prepare
and submit financial reports relevant to the ratemaking process. In
those years when a full ratemaking is conducted, the Coast Guard
generates the pilotage rates using Appendix A to 46 CFR part 404.
Between the five-year full ratemaking intervals, the Coast Guard
annually reviews the pilotage rates using Appendix C to Part 404, and
adjusts rates when deemed appropriate. Terms and formulas used in
Appendix A and Appendix C are defined in Appendix B to Part 404.
    The last full ratemaking using the Appendix A methodology was
published on April 3, 2006 (71 FR 16501). Since then, rates have been
reviewed under Appendix C and adjusted annually: 2007 (72 FR 53158,
Sep. 18, 2007); 2008 (interim rule 73 FR 15092, Mar. 21, 2008; final
rule 74 FR 220, Jan. 5, 2009); 2009 (74 FR 18669, Jul. 21, 2009). The
present rulemaking proposes a rate adjustment for the 2010 shipping
season, based on an Appendix C review. At the conclusion of this
ratemaking cycle and during the latter portion of the 2010 navigation
season, we anticipate publishing an NPRM proposing a rate adjustment
based upon an Appendix A 5-year review and full audit of the pilot
association books and records.

IV. Discussion of the Proposed Rule

    The pilotage regulations require that pilotage rates be reviewed
annually. If the annual review shows that pilotage rates are within a
reasonable range of the base target pilot compensation set in the
previous ratemaking, no adjustment to the rates will be initiated.
However, if the annual review indicates that an adjustment is
necessary, then the Coast Guard will establish new pilotage rates
pursuant to 46 CFR 404.10.

A. Proposed Pilotage Rate Changes--Summarized

    The Appendix C to 46 CFR 404 ratemaking methodology is intended for
use during the years between Appendix A full ratemaking reviews and
adjustments. This section summarizes the rate changes proposed for
2010, and then discusses in detail how the proposed changes were
calculated under Appendix C.
    We are proposing an increase of 5.07% across all Districts over the
last pilotage rate adjustment. This reflects an August 1, 2010,
increase in benchmark contractual wages and benefits and an inflation
adjustment. This rate increase would not go into effect until August 1,
2010. Actual rate increases vary by Area, and are summarized in Table
1.

                     Table 1--2010 Area Rate Changes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Then the
                                                            proposed
                                                           percentage
          If pilotage service is required in:            increases over
                                                        the current rate
                                                               is:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area 1 (Designated waters)............................              4.65
Area 2 (Undesignated waters)..........................              5.33
Area 4 (Undesignated waters)..........................              5.47
Area 5 (Designated waters)............................              4.96
Area 6 (Undesignated waters)..........................              5.27
Area 7 (Designated waters)............................              4.73
Area 8 (Undesignated waters)..........................              5.17
Overall Rate Change (percentage change in overall                   5.07
 prospective unit costs/base unit costs; see Table 18)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rates for cancellation, delay, or interruption in rendering
services (46 CFR 401.420), and basic rates and charges for carrying a
U.S. pilot beyond the normal change point, or for boarding at other
than the normal boarding point (46 CFR 401.428), have been increased by
5.07% in all Areas.

B. Calculating the Rate Adjustment

    The Appendix C ratemaking calculation involves eight steps:
    Step 1: Calculate the total economic costs for the base period
(i.e. pilot compensation expense plus all other recognized expenses
plus the return element) and divide by the total bridge hours used in
setting the base period rates;
    Step 2: Calculate the ``expense multiplier,'' the ratio of other
expenses and the return element to pilot compensation for the base
period;
    Step 3: Calculate an annual ``projection of target pilot
compensation'' using the same procedures found in Step 2 of Appendix A;
    Step 4: Increase the projected pilot compensation in Step 3 by the
expense multiplier in Step 2;
    Step 5: Adjust the result in Step 4, as required, for inflation or
deflation;
    Step 6: Divide the result in Step 5 by projected bridge hours to
determine total unit costs;
    Step 7: Divide prospective unit costs in Step 6 by the base period
unit costs in Step 1; and
    Step 8: Adjust the base period rates by the percentage changes in
unit cost in Step 7.
    The base data used to calculate each of the eight steps comes from
the 2009 Appendix C review. The Coast Guard also used the most recent
union contracts between the American Maritime Officers Union (AMOU) and
vessel owners and operators on the Great Lakes to determine target
pilot compensation. Bridge hour projections for the 2010 season have
been obtained from historical data, pilots, and industry. All documents
and records used in this rate calculation have been placed in the
public docket for this rulemaking and are available for review at the
addresses listed under ADDRESSES.
    Some values may not total exactly due to format rounding for
presentation in charts and explanations in this section. The rounding
does not affect the integrity or truncate the real value of all
calculations in the ratemaking methodology described below. Also,
please note that in previous rulemakings we calculated an expense
multiplier for each District. This was unnecessary because Appendix C
calculations are based on Area figures, not District figures. District
figures, where they are shown in the following tables, now reflect only
the arithmetical totals for each of the District's Areas.
    Step 1: Calculate the total economic cost for the base period. In
this step, for each Area, we add the total cost of target pilot
compensation, all other recognized expenses, and the return element
(net income plus interest). We divide this sum by the total bridge
hours for each Area. The result is the cost in each Area of providing
pilotage service per bridge hour for the base period. Tables 2 through
4 summarize the Step 1 calculations:

                   Table 2--Total Economic Cost for Base Period (2009), Areas in District One
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Area 1 St.          Area 2 Lake       Total* District
                                                        Lawrence River          Ontario               One
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base operating expense (less base return element)...            $538,155            $547,489          $1,085,644
Base target pilot compensation......................        + $1,617,955          + $981,589        + $2,599,544
Base return element.................................           + $10,763           + $16,425           + $27,188
                                                     -----------------------------------------------------------
    Subtotal\*\.....................................        = $2,166,873        = $1,545,503        = $3,712,376
Base bridge hours...................................             / 5,203             / 5,650            / 10,853
Base cost per bridge hour...........................           = $416.47           = $273.54           = $342.06
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*As explained in the text preceding Step 1, District totals have been expressed differently from previous
  rulemakings. This accounts for slight differences between the District totals shown in Table 16 of the 2009
  final rule and the District totals shown in this table.

                   Table 3--Total Economic Cost for Base Period (2009), Areas in District Two
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                           Area 5 Southeast
                                                       Area 4 Lake Erie      Shoal to Port      Total* District
                                                                               Huron, MI              Two
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base operating expense..............................            $502,087            $789,202          $1,291,289
Base target pilot compensation......................          + $785,271        + $1,617,955        + $2,403,226
Base return element.................................           + $25,104           + $31,568           + $56,672
                                                     -----------------------------------------------------------
    Subtotal........................................        = $1,312,463        = $2,438,725        = $3,751,188
Base bridge hours...................................             / 7,320             / 5,097            / 12,417
Base cost per bridge hour...........................           = $179.30           = $478.46           = $302.10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*See footnote to Table 2.

                  Table 4--Total Economic Cost for Base Period (2009), Areas in District Three
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Area 6 Lakes Huron   Area 7 St. Mary's      Area 8 Lake       Total* District
                                     and Michigan            River             Superior              Three
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base operating expense..........            $814,358            $398,461            $641,580          $1,854,399
Base target pilot compensation..        + $1,570,542        + $1,078,637        + $1,374,224        + $4,023,403
Base return element.............           + $32,574           + $11,954           + $19,247           + $63,776
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Subtotal....................        = $2,417,474        = $1,489,052        = $2,035,052        = $5,941,578

Base bridge hours...............            / 13,406             / 3,259            / 11,630            / 28,295
Base cost per bridge hour.......           = $180.33           = $456.90           = $174.98           = $209.99
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*See footnote to Table 2.

    Step 2. Calculate the expense multiplier. In this step, for each
Area, we add the base operating expense and the base return element.
Then, we divide the sum by the base target pilot compensation to get
the expense multiplier for each Area. Tables 5 through 7 show the Step
2 calculations.

                               Table 5--Expense Multiplier, Areas in District One
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Area 1 St.          Area 2 Lake
                                                        Lawrence River          Ontario       Total District One
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base operating expense..............................            $538,155            $547,489          $1,085,644
Base return element.................................           + $10,763           + $16,425           + $27,188
                                                     -----------------------------------------------------------
    Subtotal........................................          = $548,918          = $563,914        = $1,112,832
Base target pilot compensation......................        / $1,617,955          / $981,589          $2,599,544
Expense multiplier..................................             0.33927             0.57449                 n/a
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                               Table 6--Expense Multiplier, Areas in District Two
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                           Area 5 Southeast
                                                       Area 4 Lake Erie      Shoal to Port    Total District Two
                                                                               Huron, MI
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base operating expense..............................            $502,087            $789,202          $1,291,289
Base return element.................................           + $25,104           + $31,568           + $56,672
                                                     -----------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal............................................          = $527,192          = $820,770        = $1,347,962
Base target pilot compensation......................          / $785,271        / $1,617,955          $2,403,226
Expense multiplier..................................             0.67135             0.50729                 n/a
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              Table 7--Expense Multiplier, Areas in District Three
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Area 6 Lakes Huron   Area 7 St. Mary's      Area 8 Lake       Total District
                                     and Michigan            River             Superior              Three
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base operating Expense..........            $814,358            $398,461            $641,580          $1,854,399
Base return element.............           + $32,574           + $11,954           + $19,247           + $63,776
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Subtotal....................          = $846,932          = $410,415          = $660,828        = $1,918,175
Base target pilot compensation..        / $1,570,542        / $1,078,637        / $1,374,224          $4,023,403
Expense multiplier..............             0.53926             0.38049             0.48087                 n/a
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Step 3. Calculate annual projection of target pilot compensation.
In this step, we determine the new target rate of compensation and the
new number of pilots needed in each pilotage Area, to determine the new
target pilot compensation for each Area.
    (a) Determine new target rate of compensation. Target pilot
compensation is based on the average annual compensation of first mates
and masters on U.S. Great Lakes vessels. For pilots in undesignated
waters, we approximate the first mates' compensation and, in designated
waters, we approximate the master's compensation (first mates' wages
multiplied by 150% plus benefits). To determine first mates' and
masters' average annual compensation, we use data from the most recent
AMOU contracts with the U.S. companies engaged in Great Lakes shipping.
Where different AMOU agreements apply to different companies, we
apportion the compensation provided by each agreement according to the
percentage of tonnage represented by companies under each agreement.
    As of May 2009, there are two current AMOU contracts, which we
designate Agreement A and Agreement B. Agreement A applies to vessels
operated by Key Lakes, Inc., and Agreement B applies to all vessels
operated by American Steamship Co. and Mittal Steel USA, Inc.
    Both Agreement A and Agreement B provide for a 3% wage increase
effective August 1, 2010. Under Agreement A, the daily wage rate will
be increased from $262.73 to $270.61. Under Agreement B, the daily wage
rate will be increased from $323.86 to $333.57.
    To calculate monthly wages, we apply Agreement A and Agreement B
monthly multipliers of 54.5 and 49.5, respectively, to the daily rate.

Agreement A's 54.5 multiplier represents 30.5 average working days,
15.5 vacation days, 4 days for four weekends, 3 bonus days, and 1.5
holidays. Agreement B's 49.5 multiplier represents 30.5 average working
days, 16 vacation days, and 3 bonus days.
    To calculate average annual compensation, we multiply monthly
figures by 9 months, the length of the Great Lakes shipping season.
    Table 8 shows new wage calculations based on Agreements A and B
effective August 1, 2010.

                             Table 8--Wages
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Pilots on
                                       Pilots on       designated waters
        Monthly component            undesignated       (undesignated x
                                        waters               150%)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGREEMENT A:
$270.61 daily rate x 54.5 days..             $14,748             $22,123
AGREEMENT A:
Monthly total x 9 months = total            $132,735            $199,103
 wages..........................
AGREEMENT B:
    $333.57 daily rate x 49.5                $16,512             $24,768
     days.......................
AGREEMENT B:
    Monthly total x 9 months =              $148,608            $222,912
     total wages................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Both Agreements A and B include a health benefits contribution rate
of $88.76 effective August 1, 2010. Agreement A includes a pension plan
contribution rate of $33.35 per man-day. Agreement B includes a pension
plan contribution rate of $43.55 per man-day. Both Agreements A and B
provide a 401K employer matching rate, 5% of the wage rate. Neither
Agreement A nor Agreement B includes a clerical contribution that
appeared in earlier contracts. Per the AMOU, the multiplier used to
calculate monthly benefits is 45.5 days.
    Table 9 shows new benefit calculations based on Agreements A and B,
effective August 1, 2010.

                            Table 9--Benefits
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Pilots on
        Monthly component            undesignated          Pilots on
                                        waters         designated waters
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGREEMENT A:
    Employer contribution,                   $737.42           $1,106.13
     401(K) plan (Monthly Wages
     x 5%)......................
    Pension = $33.35 x 45.5 days           $1,517.43           $1,517.43
    Health = $88.76 x 45.5 days.           $4,038.58           $4,038.58
AGREEMENT B:
    Employer contribution,                   $825.60           $1,238.40
     401(K) plan (Monthly Wages
     x 5%)......................
    Pension = $43.55 x 45.5 days           $1,981.53           $1,981.53
    Health = $88.76 x 45.5 days.           $4,038.58           $4,038.58
AGREEMENT A:
    Monthly total benefits......         = $6,293.42         = $6,662.13
AGREEMENT A:
    Monthly total benefits x 9             = $56,641           = $59,959
     months.....................
AGREEMENT B:
    Monthly total benefits......         = $6,845.71         = $7,258.51
AGREEMENT B:
    Monthly total benefits x 9             = $61,611           = $65,327
     months.....................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                   Table 10--Total Wages and Benefits
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Pilots on
                                     undesignated          Pilots on
                                        waters         designated waters
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGREEMENT A: Wages..............            $132,735            $199,103
AGREEMENT A: Benefits...........            +$56,641            +$59,959
AGREEMENT A: Total..............          = $189,376          = $259,062
AGREEMENT B: Wages..............            $148,608            $222,912
AGREEMENT B: Benefits...........            +$61,611            +$65,327
AGREEMENT B: Total..............          = $210,219          = $288,239
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Table 11 shows that approximately one third of U.S. Great Lakes
shipping deadweight tonnage operates under Agreement A, with the
remaining two thirds operating under Agreement B.

                                                     Table 11--Deadweight Tonnage by AMOU Agreement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Company                                        Agreement A                                             Agreement B
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
American Steamship Company..............  ......................................................  815,600
Mittal Steel USA, Inc...................  ......................................................  38,826
Key Lakes, Inc..........................  361,385...............................................  ......................................................
                                         ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total tonnage, each agreement.......  361,385...............................................  854,426
                                         ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percent tonnage, each agreement.........  361,385 / 1,215,811 = 29.7238%........................  854,426 / 1,215,811 = 70.2762%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Table 12 applies the percentage of tonnage represented by each
agreement to the wages and benefits provided by each agreement, to
determine the projected target rate of compensation on a tonnage-
weighted basis.

                                                Table 12--Projected Target Rate of Compensation, Weighted
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Undesignated waters                                      Designated waters
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGREEMENT A:
    Total wages and benefits x percent    $189,376 x 29.7238% = $56,290.........................  $259,062 x 29.7238% = $77,003
     tonnage.
AGREEMENT B:
    Total wages and benefits x percent    $210,219 x 70.2762% = $147,734........................  $288,239 x 70.2762% = $202,563
     tonnage.
    Total weighted average wages and      $56,290 + $147,734 = $204,024.........................  $77,003 + $202,563 = $279,566
     benefits = projected target rate of
     compensation.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (b) Determine number of pilots needed. Subject to adjustment by the
Coast Guard Director of Great Lakes Pilotage to ensure uninterrupted
service, we determine the number of pilots needed for ratemaking
purposes in each Area by dividing each Area's projected bridge hours,
either by 1,000 (designated waters) or by 1,800 (undesignated waters).
    Bridge hours are the number of hours a pilot is aboard a vessel
providing pilotage service. Projected bridge hours are based on the
vessel traffic that pilots are expected to serve. Based on historical
data and information provided by pilots and industry, we project that
vessel traffic in the 2010 navigation season, in all Areas, will remain
unchanged from the 2009 projections noted in Table 13 of the 2009 final
rule.
    Table 13, below, shows the projected bridge hours needed for each
Area, and the total number of pilots needed for ratemaking purposes
after dividing those figures either by 1,000 or 1,800. As in 2008 and
2009, and for the same reasons, we rounded up to the next whole pilot
except in Area 2 where we rounded up from 3.14 to 5, and in Area 4
where we rounded down from 4.07 to 4.

                                        Table 13--Number of Pilots Needed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                           Divided by 1,000
                                                                              (Designated
                    Pilotage area                       Projected 2010     waters) or 1,800      Pilots needed
                                                         bridge hours        (undesignated       (total = 40)
                                                                                waters)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area 1..............................................               5,203               1,000                   6
Area 2..............................................               5,650               1,800                   5
Area 4..............................................               7,320               1,800                   4
Area 5..............................................               5,097               1,000                   6
Area 6..............................................              13,406               1,800                   8
Area 7..............................................               3,259               1,000                   4
Area 8..............................................              11,630               1,800                   7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (c) Determine the projected target pilot compensation for each
Area. The projection of new total target pilot compensation is
determined separately for each pilotage Area by multiplying the number
of pilots needed in each Area (see Table 13) by the projected target
rate of compensation (see Table 12) for pilots working in that Area.
Table 14 shows this calculation.

                                  Table 14--Projected Target Pilot Compensation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             Multiplied by
                    Pilotage area                        Pilots needed      target rate of     Projected target
                                                         (total = 40)        compensation     pilot compensation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area 1..............................................                   6          x $279,566          $1,677,397
Area 2..............................................                   5           x 204,024           1,020,120

Total, District One.................................                  11                 n/a           2,697,517
Area 4..............................................                   4           x 204,024             816,096
Area 5..............................................                   6           x 279,566           1,677,397
Total, District Two.................................                  10                 n/a           2,493,493
Area 6..............................................                   8           x 204,024           1,632,191
Area 7..............................................                   4           x 279,566           1,118,265
Area 8..............................................                   7           x 204,024           1,428,167
Total, District Three...............................                  19                 n/a           4,178,623
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Step 4: Increase the projected pilot compensation in Step 3 by the
expense multiplier in Step 2. This step yields a projected increase in
operating costs necessary to support the increased projected pilot
compensation. Table 15 shows this calculation.

                                      Table 15--Projected Operating Expense
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Projected target      Multiplied by         Projected
                    Pilotage area                     pilot compensation  expense multiplier   operating expense
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area 1..............................................          $1,677,397           x 0.33927          = $569,084
Area 2..............................................           1,020,120           x 0.57449           = 586,050
                                                     -----------------------------------------------------------
    Total, District One.............................           2,697,517                 n/a         = 1,155,134
                                                     -----------------------------------------------------------
Area 4..............................................             816,096           x 0.67135           = 547,886
Area 5..............................................           1,677,397           x 0.50729           = 850,924
                                                     -----------------------------------------------------------
    Total, District Two.............................           2,493,493                 n/a         = 1,398,810
                                                     -----------------------------------------------------------
Area 6..............................................           1,632,191           x 0.53926           = 880,177
Area 7..............................................           1,118,265           x 0.38049           = 425,493
Area 8..............................................           1,428,167           x 0.48087           = 686,767
    Total, District Three...........................           4,178,623                 n/a         = 1,992,438
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Step 5: Adjust the result in Step 4, as required, for inflation or
deflation, and calculate projected total economic cost. Based on data
from the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have
multiplied the results in Step 4 by a 1.037 inflation factor,
reflecting an average inflation rate of 3.7% in ``Midwest Economy--
Consumer Prices'' between 2007 and 2008, the latest years for which
data are available. Table 16 shows this calculation and the projected
total economic cost.

                                     Table 16--Projected Total Economic Cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              B. Increase,
                                            A. Projected      multiplied by     C. Projected      D. Projected
              Pilotage area                   operating     inflation factor    target pilot     total economic
                                               expense        (= A x 1.037)     compensation     cost (= B + C)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area 1..................................          $569,084          $590,140        $1,677,397        $2,267,537
Area 2..................................           586,050           607,733         1,020,120         1,627,853
                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total, District One.................         1,155,134         1,197,874         2,697,517         3,895,390
                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Area 4..................................           547,886           568,158           816,096         1,384,253
Area 5..................................           850,924           882,408         1,677,397         2,559,805
                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total, District Two.................         1,398,810         1,450,566         2,493,493         3,944,058
                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Area 6..................................           880,177           912,744         1,632,191         2,544,935
Area 7..................................           425,493           441,236         1,118,265         1,559,501
Area 8..................................           686,767           712,178         1,428,167         2,140,345
                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total, District Three...............         1,992,438         2,066,158         4,178,623         6,244,781
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Step 6: Divide the result in Step 5 by projected bridge hours to
determine total unit costs. Table 17 shows this calculation.

                                           Table 17--Total Unit Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Prospective
                                                              A. Projected      B. Projected      (total) unit
                       Pilotage area                         total economic      2009 bridge        costs  (A
                                                                  cost              hours         divided by B)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area 1....................................................        $2,267,537             5,203           $435.81
Area 2....................................................         1,627,853             5,650            288.12
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
    Total, District One...................................         3,895,390            10,853            358.92
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
Area 4....................................................         1,384,253             7,320            189.11
Area 5....................................................         2,559,805             5,097            502.22
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
    Total, District Two...................................         3,944,058            12,417            317.63
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
Area 6....................................................         2,544,935            13,406            189.84
Area 7....................................................         1,559,501             3,259            478.52
Area 8....................................................         2,140,345            11,630            184.04
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
    Total, District Three.................................         6,244,781            28,295            220.70
                                                           =====================================================
        Overall...........................................        14,084,230            51,565            273.14
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Step 7: Divide prospective unit costs (total unit costs) in Step 6
by the base period unit costs in Step 1. Table 18 shows this
calculation, which expresses the percentage change between the total
unit costs and the base unit costs. The results, for each Area, are
identical with the percentage increases listed in Table 1.

                                    Table 18--Percentage Change in Unit Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                C. Percentage
                                                                                change from base
                       Pilotage area                         A. Prospective    B. Base period   (A divided by B;
                                                               unit costs        unit costs     result expressed
                                                                                as percentage)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area 1....................................................           $435.81           $416.47              4.65
Area 2....................................................            288.12            273.54              5.33
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
    Total, District One...................................            358.92            342.06              4.93
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
Area 4....................................................            189.11            179.30              5.47
Area 5....................................................            502.22            478.46              4.96
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
    Total, District Two...................................            317.63            302.10              5.14
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
Area 6....................................................            189.84            180.33              5.27
Area 7....................................................            478.52            456.90              4.73
Area 8....................................................            184.04            174.98              5.17
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
    Total, District Three.................................            220.70            209.99              5.10
                                                           =====================================================
        Overall...........................................            273.14            259.97              5.07
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Step 8: Adjust the base period rates by the percentage change in
unit costs in Step 7. Table 19 shows this calculation.

                    Table 19--Base Period Rates Adjusted by Percentage Change in Unit Costs*
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 B. Percentage    C. Increase in
           Pilotage             A. Base period   change in unit   base rate (A x     D. Adjusted rate (A + C,
                                     rate            costs             B%)          rounded to nearest dollar)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area                                              (Multiplying
                                                     Factor)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area 1:                        ...............  4.65 (1.0465)..  ...............  ..............................
    --Basic pilotage.........  $16.95/km,       ...............  $0.78/km, $1.39/ $17.73/km, $31.38/mi.
                                $29.99/mi.                        mi.
    --Each lock transited....  375.47.........  ...............  17.44..........  393.
    --Harbor movage..........  1,229.41.......  ...............  57.11..........  1,287.
    --Minimum basic rate, St.  820.04.........  ...............  38.09..........  858.
     Lawrence River.

    --Maximum rate, through    3,599.58.......  ...............  167.20.........  3,767.
     trip.
Area 2:                        ...............  5.33 (1.0533)..  ...............  ..............................
    --6-hr. period...........  817.63.........  ...............  43.56..........  861.
    --Docking or undocking...  779.92.........  ...............  41.55..........  821.
Area 4:                        ...............  5.47 (1.0547)..  ...............  ..............................
    --6-hr. period...........  722.05.........  ...............  39.49..........  762.
    --Docking or undocking...  556.46.........  ...............  30.44..........  587.
    --Any point on Niagara     1,420.45.......  ...............  77.69..........  1,498.
     River below Black Rock
     Lock.
Area 5 between any point on    ...............  4.96 (1.0496)..  ...............  ..............................
 or in:
    --Toledo or any point on   1,299.46.......  ...............  64.51..........  1,364.
     Lake Erie W. of
     Southeast Shoal.
    --Toledo or any point on   2,198.99.......  ...............  109.16.........  2,308.
     Lake Erie W. of
     Southeast Shoal &
     Southeast Shoal.
    --Toledo or any point on   2,855.20.......  ...............  141.74.........  2,997.
     Lake Erie W. of
     Southeast Shoal &
     Detroit River.
    --Toledo or any point on   2,198.99.......  ...............  109.16.........  2,308.
     Lake Erie W. of
     Southeast Shoal &
     Detroit Pilot Boat.
    --Port Huron Change Point  3,829.80.......  ...............  190.12.........  4,020.
     & Southeast Shoal (when
     pilots are not changed
     at the Detroit Pilot
     Boat).
    --Port Huron Change Point  4,436.82.......  ...............  220.26.........  4,657.
     & Toledo or any point on
     Lake Erie W. of
     Southeast Shoal (when
     pilots are not changed
     at the Detroit Pilot
     Boat).
    --Port Huron Change Point  2,877.20.......  ...............  142.83.........  3,020.
     & Detroit River.
    --Port Huron Change Point  2,237.82.......  ...............  111.09.........  2,349.
     & Detroit Pilot Boat.
    --Port Huron Change Point  1,590.68.......  ...............  78.97..........  1,670.
     & St. Clair River.
    --St. Clair River........  1,299.46.......  ...............  64.51..........  1,364.
    --St. Clair River &        3,829.80.......  ...............  190.12.........  4,020.
     Southeast Shoal (when
     pilots are not changed
     at the Detroit Pilot
     Boat).
    --St. Clair River &        2,877.20.......  ...............  142.83.........  3,020.
     Detroit River/Detroit
     Pilot Boat.
    --Detroit, Windsor, or     1,299.46.......  ...............  64.51..........  1,364.
     Detroit River.
    --Detroit, Windsor, or     2,198.99.......  ...............  109.16.........  2,308.
     Detroit River &
     Southeast Shoal.
    --Detroit, Windsor, or     2,855.20.......  ...............  141.74.........  2,997.
     Detroit River & Toledo
     or any point on Lake
     Erie W. of Southeast
     Shoal.
    --Detroit, Windsor, or     2,877.20.......  ...............  142.83.........  3,020.
     Detroit River & St.
     Clair River.
    --Detroit Pilot Boat &     1,590.68.......  ...............  78.97..........  1,670.
     Southeast Shoal.
    --Detroit Pilot Boat &     2,198.99.......  ...............  109.16.........  2,308.
     Toledo or any point on
     Lake Erie W. of
     Southeast Shoal.
    --Detroit Pilot Boat &     2,877.20.......  ...............  142.83.........  3,020.
     St. Clair River.
Area 6:                        ...............  5.27 (1.0527)..  ...............  ..............................
    --6-hr. period...........  622.93.........  ...............  32.84..........  656.
    --Docking or undocking...  591.72.........  ...............  31.20..........  623.
Area 7 between any point on    ...............  4.73 (1.0473)..  ...............  ..............................
 or in:
    --Gros Cap & De Tour.....  2,442.98.......  ...............  115.57.........  2,559.
    --Algoma Steel Corp.       2,442.98.......  ...............  115.57.........  2,559.
     Wharf, Sault Ste. Marie,
     Ont. & De Tour.

    --Algoma Steel Corp.       920.03.........  ...............  43.52..........  964.
     Wharf, Sault Ste. Marie,
     Ont. & Gros Cap.
    --Any point in Sault Ste.  2,047.67.......  ...............  96.87..........  2,145.
     Marie, Ont., except the
     Algoma Steel Corp. Wharf
     & De Tour.
    --Any point in Sault Ste.  920.03.........  ...............  43.52..........  964.
     Marie, Ont., except the
     Algoma Steel Corp. Wharf
     & Gros Cap.
    --Sault Ste. Marie, MI &   2,047.67.......  ...............  96.87..........  2,145.
     De Tour.
    --Sault Ste. Marie, MI &   920.03.........  ...............  43.52..........  964.
     Gros Cap.
    --Harbor movage..........  920.03.........  ...............  43.52..........  964
Area 8:                        ...............  5.17 (1.0517)..  ...............  ..............................
    --6 hr. period...........  549.44.........  ...............  28.42..........  578.
    --Docking or undocking...  522.20.........  ...............  27.02..........  549.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Rates for ``Cancellation, delay or interruption in rendering services (Sec.   401.420)'' and ``Basic Rates and
  charges for carrying a U.S. pilot beyond the normal change point, or for boarding at other than the normal
  boarding point (Sec.   401.428)'' are not reflected in this table but have been increased by 5.07% across all
  areas.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below, we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' 58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993, requires a determination whether a regulatory
action is ``significant'' and therefore subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) and subject to the requirements of the
Executive Order. This rulemaking is not significant under Executive
Order 12866 and will not be reviewed by OMB.
    The Coast Guard is required to conduct an annual review of pilotage
rates on the Great Lakes and, if necessary, adjust these rates to align
compensation levels between Great Lakes pilots and industry. See the
``Background and Purpose'' section for a detailed explanation of the
legal authority and requirements for the Coast Guard to conduct an
annual review and provide possible adjustments of pilotage rates on the
Great Lakes. Based on our annual review for this rulemaking, we are
proposing an adjustment to the pilotage rates for the 2010 shipping
season to generate sufficient revenue to cover allowable expenses,
target pilot compensation, and returns on investment.
    This proposed rule would implement a 5.07 percent overall rate
adjustment for the Great Lakes system over the current rate as adjusted
in the 2009 final rule. These adjustments to Great Lakes pilotage rates
meet the requirements set forth in 46 CFR part 404 for similar
compensation levels between Great Lakes pilots and industry. They also
include adjustments for inflation and changes in association expenses
to maintain these compensation levels.
    In general, we expect an increase in pilotage rates for a certain
area to result in additional costs for shippers using pilotage services
in that area, while a decrease would result in a cost reduction or
savings for shippers in that area. This proposed rule would result in a
distributional effect that transfers payments (income) from affected
shippers (vessel owners and operators) to the Great Lakes' pilot
associations through Coast Guard regulated pilotage rates.
    The shippers affected by these rate adjustments are those owners
and operators of domestic vessels operating on register (employed in
the foreign trade) and owners and operators of foreign vessels on a
route within the Great Lakes system. These owners and operators must
have pilots or pilotage service as required by 46 U.S.C. 9302. There is
no minimum tonnage limit or exemption for these vessels. However, the
Coast Guard issued a policy position several years ago stating that the
statute applies only to commercial vessels and not to recreational
vessels.
    Owners and operators of other vessels that are not affected by this
proposed rule, such as recreational boats and vessels only operating
within the Great Lakes system, may elect to purchase pilotage services.
However, this election is voluntary and does not affect the Coast
Guard's calculation of the rate increase and is not a part of our
estimated national cost to shippers.
    We reviewed a sample of pilot source forms, which are the forms
used to record pilotage transactions on vessels, and discovered very
few cases of U.S. Great Lakes vessels (i.e., domestic vessels without
registry operating only in the Great Lakes) that purchased pilotage
services. We found a case where the vessel operator purchased pilotage
service in District One to presumably leave the Great Lakes system. We
assume some vessel owners and operators may also choose to purchase
pilotage services if their vessels are carrying hazardous substances or
were navigating the Great Lakes system with inexperienced personnel.
Based on information from the Coast Guard Office of Great Lakes
Pilotage, we have determined that these vessels voluntarily chose to
use pilots and, therefore, are exempt from pilotage requirements.
    We used 2006-2008 vessel arrival data from the Coast Guard's Marine
Information for Safety and Law Enforcement (MISLE) system to estimate
the average annual number of vessels affected by the rate adjustment to
be 208 vessels that journey into the Great Lakes system. These vessels
entered the Great Lakes by transiting through or in part of at least
one of the three pilotage Districts before leaving the Great Lakes

system. These vessels often make more than one distinct stop, docking,
loading, and unloading at facilities in Great Lakes ports. Of the total
trips for the 208 vessels, there were approximately 923 annual U.S.
port arrivals before the vessels left the Great Lakes system, based on
2006-2008 vessel data from MISLE.
    The impact of the rate adjustment to shippers is estimated from the
district pilotage revenues. These revenues represent the direct and
indirect costs (``economic costs'') that shippers must pay for pilotage
services. The Coast Guard sets rates so that revenues equal the
estimated cost of pilotage.
    We estimate the additional impact (costs or savings) of the rate
adjustment in this proposed rule to be the difference between the total
projected revenue needed to cover costs based on the 2009 rate
adjustment and the total projected revenue needed to cover costs in
this proposed rule for 2010. Table 20 details additional costs or
savings by area and district.

           Table 20--Rate Adjustment and Additional Impact of Proposed Rule ($U.S.; non-discounted)\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Total                           Total        Additional
                                                     projected     Proposed rate     projected      revenue or
                                                    expenses in       change        expenses in    cost of this
                                                       2009                          2010 \2\     rulemaking \3\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area 1..........................................      $2,166,873          1.0465      $2,267,537        $100,664
Area 2..........................................       1,545,503          1.0533       1,627,853          82,350
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Total, District One.........................       3,712,376  ..............       3,895,390         183,014
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
Area 4..........................................       1,312,463          1.0547       1,384,253          71,791
Area 5..........................................       2,438,725          1.0496       2,559,805         121,080
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Total, District Two.........................       3,751,188  ..............       3,944,058         192,870
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
Area 6..........................................       2,417,474          1.0527       2,544,935         127,461
Area 7..........................................       1,489,052          1.0473       1,559,501          70,449
Area 8..........................................       2,035,052          1.0517       2,140,345         105,293
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Total, District Three.......................       5,941,578  ..............       6,244,781         303,203
                                                 ===============================================================
        All Districts...........................      13,405,142  ..............      14,084,230         679,088
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Some values may not total due to rounding.
\2\ Rate changes are calculated for areas only. District totals reflect arithmetic totals and are for
  informational and discussion purposes. See discussion in proposed rule for further details.
\3\ Additional Revenue or Cost of this Rulemaking = `Total Projected Expenses in 2010'-`Total Projected Expenses
  in 2009'.

    After applying the rate change in this proposed rule, the resulting
difference between the projected revenue in 2009 and the projected
revenue in 2010 is the annual impact to shippers from this proposed
rule. This figure will be equivalent to the total additional payments
or savings that shippers will incur for pilotage services from this
rule. As discussed earlier, we consider a reduction in payments to be a
cost savings.
    The impact of the rate adjustment in this proposed rule to shippers
varies by area and district. The annual non-discounted costs of the
rate adjustments in Districts 1 and 2 would be approximately $183,000
and $193,000, respectively, while District 3 would experience an annual
non-discounted cost of approximately $300,000. To calculate an exact
cost or savings per vessel is difficult because of the variation in
vessel types, routes, port arrivals, commodity carriage, time of
season, conditions during navigation, and preferences for the extent of
pilotage services on designated and undesignated portions of the Great
Lakes system. Some owners and operators would pay more and some would
pay less depending on the distance and port arrivals of their vessels'
trips. However, the annual cost or savings reported above does capture
all of the additional cost the shippers face as a result of the rate
adjustment in this rule.
    As Table 20 indicates, all areas would experience an increased
annual cost due to this proposed rulemaking. The overall impact of the
proposed rule would be an additional cost to shippers of just over
$679,000 across all three districts, due primarily to an increase in
benchmark contractual wages and benefits and an inflation adjustment.

B. Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000 people.
    We expect entities affected by the proposed rule would be
classified under the North American Industry Classification System
(NAICS) code subsector 483-Water Transportation, which includes one or
all of the following 6-digit NAICS codes for freight transportation:
483111-Deep Sea Freight Transportation, 483113-Coastal and Great Lakes
Freight Transportation, and 483211-Inland Water Freight Transportation.
According to the Small Business Administration's definition, a U.S.
company with these NAICS codes and employing less than 500 employees is
considered a small entity.
    For the proposed rule, we reviewed recent company size and
ownership data from 2006-2008 Coast Guard MISLE data and business
revenue and size data provided by Reference USA and Dunn and
Bradstreet. We were able to gather revenue and size data or link the
entities to large shipping conglomerates for 22 of the 24 affected
entities in the United States. We found that large, mostly foreign-
owned, shipping conglomerates or their subsidiaries owned or operated
all vessels engaged in foreign trade on the Great Lakes. We assume that
new

industry entrants will be comparable in ownership and size to these
shippers.
    There are three U.S. entities affected by the proposed rule that
receive revenue from pilotage services. These are the three pilot
associations that provide and manage pilotage services within the Great
Lakes districts. Two of the associations operate as partnerships and
one operates as a corporation. These associations are classified with
the same NAICS industry classification and small entity size standards
described above, but they have far fewer than 500 employees:
Approximately 65 total employees combined. We expect no adverse impact
to these entities from this proposed rule since all associations
receive enough revenue to balance the projected expenses associated
with the projected number of bridge hours and pilots.
    Therefore, the Coast Guard has determined that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities under 5 U.S.C. 605(b). If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have a significant economic impact on
it, please submit a comment to the Docket Management Facility at the
address under ADDRESSES. In your comment, explain why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree this proposed rule would
economically affect it.

C. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the proposed rule so that they could better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
proposed rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please call Mr. Paul M.
Wasserman, Chief,Great Lakes Pilotage Branch, Commandant (CG-54122),
U.S. Coast Guard, at<PHONE_NUMBER>, by fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by e-mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Small businesses may send comments on the
actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small
business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast
Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).

D. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). This
rule does not change the burden in the collection currently approved by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under OMB Control Number
1625-0086, Great Lakes Pilotage Methodology.

E. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism because there are no similar State regulations, and the
States do not have the authority to regulate and adjust rates for
pilotage services in the Great Lakes system.

F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule would not result in such expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

G. Taking of Private Property

    This rule would not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

H. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

I. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

J. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

K. Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

L. Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards.
Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.

M. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that this action is one of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically

excluded under section 2.B.2, figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(a) of the
Instruction. Paragraph 34(a) pertains to minor regulatory changes that
are editorial or procedural in nature. This rule adjusts rates in
accordance with applicable statutory and regulatory mandates. An
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 401

    Administrative practice and procedure, Great Lakes, Navigation
(water), Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Seamen.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 46 CFR Part 401 as follows:

PART 401--GREAT LAKES PILOTAGE REGULATIONS

    1. The authority citation for part 401 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 2104(a), 6101, 7701, 8105, 9303, 9304;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 46 CFR
401.105 also issued under the authority of 44 U.S.C. 3507.

    2. In Sec.  401.405, revise paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as
follows:

Sec.  401.405  Basic rates and charges on the St. Lawrence River and
Lake Ontario.

* * * * *
    (a) Area 1 (Designated Waters):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Service                        St. Lawrence River
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Pilotage............................  $17.73 per Kilometer or
                                             $31.38 per mile.\1\
Each Lock Transited.......................  $393.\1\
Harbor Movage.............................  $1287.\1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The minimum basic rate for assignment of a pilot in the St. Lawrence
  River is $858, and the maximum basic rate for a through trip is
  $3,767.

    (b) Area 2 (Undesignated Waters):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Lake
                          Service                              Ontario
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Six-Hour Period............................................         $861
Docking or Undocking.......................................          821
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. In Sec.  401.407, revise paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as
follows:

Sec.  401.407  Basic rates and charges on Lake Erie and the navigable
waters from Southeast Shoal to Port Huron, MI.

* * * * *
    (a) Area 4 (Undesignated Waters):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Lake Erie
                                             (East of
                 Service                     Southeast        Buffalo
                                              Shoal)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Six-Hour Period.........................            $762            $762
Docking or Undocking....................             587             587
Any Point on the Niagara River below the             N/A           1,498
 Black Rock Lock........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (b) Area 5 (Designated Waters):

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Toledo or
                                                               any point
                                                                on Lake
               Any point on or in                 Southeast    Erie west     Detroit      Detroit     St. Clair
                                                    Shoal          of         River      Pilot Boat     River
                                                               Southeast
                                                                 Shoal
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Toledo or any point on Lake Erie west of              $2,308       $1,364       $2,997       $2,308          N/A
 Southeast Shoal...............................
Port Huron Change Point........................    \1\ 4,020    \1\ 4,657        3,020        2,349        1,670
St. Clair River................................    \1\ 4,020          N/A        3,020        3,020        1,364
Detroit or Windsor or the Detroit River........        2,308        2,997        1,364          N/A        3,020
Detroit Pilot Boat.............................        1,670        2,308          N/A          N/A        3,020
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ When pilots are not changed at the Detroit Pilot Boat.

    4. In Sec.  401.410, revise paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) to read as
follows:

Sec.  401.410  Basic rates and charges on Lakes Huron, Michigan, and
Superior, and the St. Mary's River.

* * * * *
    (a) Area 6 (Undesignated Waters):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Lakes Huron
                          Service                                and
                                                               Michigan
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Six-Hour Period............................................         $656
Docking or Undocking.......................................          623
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (b) Area 7 (Designated Waters):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Area                  De Tour      Gros Cap    Any Harbor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gros Cap.........................       $2,559          N/A          N/A
Algoma Steel Corporation Wharf at        2,559          964          N/A
 Sault Ste. Marie Ontario........
Any point in Sault Ste. Marie,           2,145          964          N/A
 Ontario, except the Algoma Steel
 Corporation Wharf...............
Sault Ste. Marie, MI.............        2,145          964          N/A
Harbor Movage....................          N/A          N/A         $964
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (c) Area 8 (Undesignated Waters):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Lake
                          Service                              Superior
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Six-Hour Period............................................         $578
Docking or Undocking.......................................          549
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sec.  401.420  [Amended]

    5. In Sec.  401.420--
    a. In paragraph (a), remove the number ``$113'' and add, in its
place, the number ``$119''; and remove the number ``$1,777'' and add,
in its place, the number ``$1,867''.
    b. In paragraph (b), remove the number ``$113'' and add, in its
place, the number ``$119''; and remove the number ``$1,777'' and add,
in its place, the number ``$1,867''.
    c. In paragraph (c)(1), remove the number ``$671'' and add, in its
place, the number ``$705''.
    d. In paragraph (c)(3), remove the number ``$113'' and add, in its
place, the number ``$119''; and, also in paragraph (c)(3), remove the
number ``$1,777'' and add, in its place, the number ``$1,867''.

Sec.  401.428  [Amended]

    6. In Sec.  401.428, remove the number ``$684'' and add, in its
place, the number ``$719''.

    Dated: October 26, 2009.
Kevin S. Cook,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Director of Prevention Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-26212 Filed 10-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P