DATE:	January 62930, 2012

SUBJECT:	Development of the RTR Risk Modeling Dataset for the Secondary
Aluminum Production Source Category

FROM:	Mark Bahner, RTI International

TO:		Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Protection Agency (the EPA)

The purpose of this memorandum is to document the technical approach and
rationale used to develop risk modeling input data for hazardous air
pollutant (HAP) emissions for secondary aluminum production facilities.
This work is being performed pursuant to section 112(f) of the Clean Air
Act as part of the residual risk assessment for facilities that are
subject to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP) for Secondary Aluminum Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
RRR).

Facilities Modeled

There are an estimated 161 facilities There are estimated to be 161
facilities subject to the Secondary Aluminum Production NESHAP. Risk
assessment inputs were developed for 155 facilities, as shown in Table
1. There were six facilities that are subject to the Secondary Aluminum
NESHAP that were not included in the risk assessment input files, as
shown in Table 2. The facilities that were not included in the risk
assessment input files included one major HAP source and five area HAP
sources. The major HAP source was not included because the secondary
aluminum equipment at the source consists of group 2 furnaces, which do
not have emission limits under the NESHAP. The five area sources were
not included because they had no equipment subject to dioxins/furans
emissions standards, which are the only standards applicable to
secondary aluminum production area sources.

Emission Process Groups Modeled

Table 3 shows the secondary aluminum emission process groups that were
modeled. Also modeled as part of facility-wide risk assessments were
primary aluminum sources that were collocated at secondary aluminmum
facilities. Finally, other collocated operations such as coating lines,
gas-fired boilers, and other emission processes were also included in
the facility-wide modeling. Group 2 furnaces were not included in the
modeling dataset because the EPA did not have HAP emissions estimates
for those furnaces..

Collocated Sources

The Mmodeling inputs for the primary aluminum operations collocated at
secondary aluminum production facilities are exactly the same as the
inputs used in the recent previous risk assessment for the primary
aluminum production source categoryfacility risk modeling.1

Compound-Specific Emissions

The pollutants regulated under subpart RRR are particulate matter (PM),
hydrochloric acid (HCl), total hydrocarbon (THC) and dioxins/furans
(D/F). Emissions standards for various pieces ofthe affected secondary
aluminum equipmentsources are given in Table 34.

Subpart RRR uses PM as a surrogate for metallic hazardous air pollutants
(HAPs) and THC is a surrogate for organic HAPs. Since subpart RRR
compliance testing is performed for the surrogate PM and THC, there are
limited test data available for compound-specific metallic and organic
HAP emissions. Therefore,In order to generate compound-specific metallic
HAP and organic HAP data were obtained from nine companies performing
secondary aluminum production via, Clean Air Act Section 114 requests
(also known as Information Collection Requests, or ICRs).1) were sent to
nine companies, asking them to perform tests and provide the resulting
data regarding metallic HAP and organic HAP emissions.2

The metallic HAP data collected consisted of metallic HAP concentrations
in the particulate caught in air pollution control devices serving
various pieces of equipment. The results of this testing are shown in
Table 4. The data in Table 4The metallic HAP data reported in the ICRs
consisted of metallic HAP concentrations in the particulate collected in
air pollution control devices that controlled emissions from various
pieces of equipment. Using these test data, Table 5 presents the
average, mininumminimum, and maxiummaximum concentrations of metallic
HAPs in PM emitted from individual secondary aluminum operations. It
should be noted that the testing ICR was not designed exclusively to
obtain metallic HAP data. Rather, the intent was to contact nine
companies that operated many pieces of equipment, with an emphasis on
companies that operated thermal chip dryers or scrap
dryer/delacquering/decoating kilns (because the latter two pieces of
equipment are relatively rare in the industry). However, even though
gathering metallic HAP data was only one of the goals of the testing
ICR, the data gathered is considered representative, because in most
cases, many data points from multiple plants for each piece of equipment
were obtained. See Table 5 for the results of metals testing; the
average values in Table 5 were used in the residual risk input file.

The data in Table 5 can be used to calculate emissions of specific
metallic HAPs from a particular piece of secondary aluminum equipment.
For example, assume a groupGroup 1 furnace handling other than clean
charge receives 100,000 tons per year (tpy) of charge. The allowable
emissions of PM (from Table 34) are 0.4 lb/ton of charge, so allowable
emissions of PM are 40,000 lb/year (or 20 tons per year). The average
concentration of antimony (from Table 45) in the PM is 18.6 mg/kg (i.e.,
18.6 parts per million, or ppm).  The calculated allowable emissions of
antimony are therefore 20 tpy times 18.6 ppm, or 3.72E-04 tpy.

The ICR organic HAP data waswere collected by performing stack testing
on thermal chip dryers and scrap dryer/delacquering decoating kilns,
which are the two types of secondary aluminum equipmentsources that are
regulated for THC emissions. Testing was conducted for both THC and
individual organic HAP emissions (in. Test results were reported as
pounds per ton of feed, or lb/ton of feed) and individual organic HAPs
(also in  (lb/ton of feed). The collected information was used to
calculate allowable emissions for each organic HAP. at the THC limit
given in the standard. For example, the THC limit for a thermal chip
dryer is 0.8 lb/ton of feed. If the test results were 0.4 lb/ton of feed
for THC, and 1E-03 lb/ton of feed for benzene, the allowable benzene
emissions would be 2E-03 lb/ton of feed (i.e., since the measured THC
emissions were half of the NESHAP limit, the measured benzene emissions
were multiplied by two to calculate the allowable emissions. Results for
allowable emissions of organic HAPs are summarized in Table 56, in
kilograms per megagram (kg/Mg) of feed. The results are separated into
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and semivolatile organic compounds
(SVOCs). The results in Table 6 can be converted to allowable emissions
for each organic HAP for each piece of equipment. Take the example, of a
thermal chip dryer with a production of 100,000 tpy. The allowable
emissions (in the “average” column) for acrylonitrile from a thermal
chip dryer are 9.89E-04 kg/Mg. Therefore, the allowable acrylonitrile
emissions for this piece of equipment would be 0.0989 tons per year
(i.e., 100,000 tpy, multiplied by 9.89E-4 kg/Mg, divided by 1000 kg/Mg).

As described above, Tables 5 and 6 were used in conjunction with
production data to estimate allowable speciated metallic and organic HAP
emissions for each piece of equipment subject to Subpart RRR at each
facility. As also described above, it was necessary to do this because
the standards for metallic HAPs are in the form of a PM surrogate, and
the standards for organic HAPs are in the form of a THC surrogate.
Therefore, facilities measure the PM and THC surrogates to determine
compliance with the standards, rather than measuring speciated metallic
and organic HAPs. This conversion was not necessary for HCl, since HCl
is the form of the standard, and facilities are directly measuring HCl.
Facilities also report D/F emissions; these emissions will be discussed
in Section 8.

All-Company ICR Responses

In addition to the nine-company testing ICR sent out on May 27, 2010, an
ICR was sent to all facilities thought to potentially be subject to
subpart RRR.2 on February 7, 2011.3 Responses to this request were used
for many aspects of the modeling inputs, including:

Latitudes and longitudes of stacks

Height, diameter, exhaust gas flow rate, and exhaust gas temperature for
stacksstack releases

Type of equipment exhausting to stacks (e.g. scrap shredder, thermal
chip dryer, group 1 furnace handling other than clean charge, etc.)

Aluminum production of equipment exhausting to stacks, and

Reported actual emissions

Reported actual emissions PM (as a surrogate for HAP metals), THC (as a
surrogate for organic HAPs), HCl, D/F (either reported as individual
congeners or TEQ, or both), and other HAPs, chiefly from collocated
sources (except for primary aluminum, for which modeling files had
already been developed1).

Three separate types of information regarding equipment production or
capacity were requested:

 Mass of charge (tons/yr) – this was the actual charge in the most
recent year (after 2004)

Maximum capacity of unit (tons/year), and

Charge during most recent performance test (lb/hr)

The maximum capacity of the unit (tons/year) was used to estimate
allowable emissions for the unit, whereas actual emissions were based on
the amount of charge for the most recent year (after 2004).

Allowable Emissions Calculation Procedures

Allowable emissions were calculated as the product of the maximum
capacity of the unit (from the all-company ICR response) times a
conversion factor that calculated the allowable emissions of the
surrogate pollutant (e.g., PM or THC) times the concentration of the
compound-specific metallic or organic HAP (from the nine-company testing
ICR responses, as shown in Tables 45 and 56).

Table 67 shows how conversion factors were calculated for each piece of
equipment and pollutant, and Table 78 summarizes the conversion factors
used in the allowable emissions calculations. The units of the
conversion factors are allowable tons of surrogate pollutant emissions
(e.g. PM, THC, HCl) per ton of feed.

 Table 89 provides an example of allowable emissions calculation
resultscalculations for a HAP metal (antimony), HCl, D/F (in toxic
equivalents), a volatile organic HAP (acrylonitrile), and a
semi-volatile organic HAP (acenaphthene).

Actual Emissions Calculation Procedures

Actual emissions were calculated as a fraction of allowable emissions,
using the actual amount charged in the most recent year (from the
all-company ICR responses), and the actual emissions of surrogate
pollutants (from the all-company ICR responses).  It should be noted
that nearly all companies provided only the surrogate pollutant
information (i.e., PM and THC) rather than the speciated HAP information
(i.e. speciated HAP metals and speciated organic HAP). Further, no
company provided the complete suite of metallic and organic HAPs for
which extensive testing was conducted in the nine-company ICR.
Therefore, we used reported surrogate emissions, and calculated the
speciated metallic and organic HAP emissions using the nine-company
testing data. The only instances where we used the facilities’
reported speciated metallic and organic HAP emissions were for the
facility-wide HAP emissions modeling, when processes were not covered
under the secondary aluminum or primary aluminum NESHAPs.

Table 910 provides an example of actual emissions calculation results
forcalculationsforcalculations for a HAP metal (antimony), HCl, D/F (in
toxic equivalents), a volatile organic HAP (acrylonitrile), and a
semi-volatile organic HAP (acenaphthene).

Stack Locations and Stack Characteristics

™ and sent to facilities for confirmation or correction wherewhen time
was available. The confirmation or correction consisted of sending
individual facilities a picture (.jpg) file of the ICR response
latitudes and longitudes plotted in Google Earth™, with a request that
the facility either confirm or correct the plotted locations. WhereWhen
there was insufficient time to obtain facility responses, the results
plotted in Google Earth™ were simply checked to ensure that the stack
latitudes and longitudes were located on a building at the facility
site, or at a control device near a building. Where the results were not
located on or neara a building at the facility site or a control device
near a building, the latitudes and longitudes were adjusted.

Default Values

WhereIf emissions were not reported in the ICR responses, default
emission factors were used. These default emission factors were the
average values determined from test results that were reported and
credible. Table 1011 summarizes the default emission factors used for
modeling. For example, the average D/F emission rate during testing of
Group 1 furnaces  processing other than clean charge was 2.16 µg/Mg of
feed, and the emission limit is 15 µg/Mg of feed. Therefore, the
average test result was 0.144 times the standard. Similarly, the average
PM emission rate during testing of Group 1 furnaces firing other than
clean charge was 0.184 lb/ton of feed, and the emission limit is 0.4
lb/ton of feed; therefore, the average test result was 0.460 times the
standard.

Default production capacity factor values were also used when the actual
production in the most recent year was not given, or was claimed as
Confidential Business Information (CBI). Production capacity factor is
the ratio of the actual production for the most recent year divided by
the production capacity. As with the default emission factors, the
default production capacities were taken as the average production
capacity for all equipment of the same type. Table 1112 summarizes
default production capacitiescapacity factors.

The method in which these defaults were used can be illustrated for a
facility that has reported a maximum production capacity for a group 1
furnace handling only clean charge of 100,000 tpy, but reported the
actual production in the most recent year as CBI. If so, the production
capacity factor of 0.493 would be used, and the actual production would
be assumed to be 49,300 tpy. Similarly, if HCl emissions were not
reported for this furnace, the default emission factor of 0.144 lb/ton
would be used. Therefore, the actual HCl emissions would be calculated
as 49,300 tpy times 0.144 lb/ton, or 7099 lb/yr, or 3.55 tpy.

Chromium and Mercury Speciation

Mercury emissions from the Ssecondary Aaluminum Pproduction source
category are extremely low (on the order of one pound per year for all
of the secondary aluminum production major sources. However, for risk
modeling purposes, mercury emissions were assumed to be 80 percent
elemental gaseous mercury, 10 percent divalent gaseous mercury, and 10
percent particulate mercury.

Chromium speciation between hexavalent chromium and total chromium was
as shown in Table 5 for Subpart RRR sources. For other facility-wide
sources, 3 percent of chromium was asssumedassumed to be hexavalent.

Allowable and Actual Emissions Results for D/F

D/F was determined to be a risk driver for both major sources and area
sources. (In fact, D/F was the only HAP modeled for area sources.)
Therefore, the procedures used to calculate D/F emissions and the
resulting calculated emissions will be presented here. The all-company
ICR requested that facilities provide individual D/F congener data.
However, many facilities provided both individual congener data and TEQ
values, and some facilities provided only TEQ values. The May 23, 2000
Federal Register notice for the secondary aluminum NESHAP directs
facilities to calculate TEQ values using EPA-625/3-89-016, so the
individual congener toxic equivalency factor (TEF) values in that
document were used to calculate TEQ values for this modeling. Calculated
allowable and actual emissions of D/F (in TEQ) for major sources are
presented in Table 1213 and for area sources in Table 1314.

Quality Control Checks and Resulting Changes

Data reported in the ICRs were checked in several ways. The paragraphs
below discuss data quality checks that were performed and changes that
were made when data reported in the ICR responses were found to be
incorrect.

First, the stack latitudes and longitudes reported by facilities were
checked in Google Earth™, as previously described.

Anomalously high production values for RTI #120 (Crestwood Metals) were
resolved through discussions with a consultant for that company.

For RTI #257 and #352, test reports were received but no Excel™
workbook ICR responses were received. Therefore, risk input files were
developed from the test reports and Google Earth™ images. Similarly,
air permits were available for RTI #85 and #384, but no Excel™
workbook ICR responses were received. Risk input files were therefore
developed from the air permits and Google Earth™ images.

In general, emissions from non-Subpart RRR equipment were input directly
into risk files. One facility (RTI #292, NEI8066) reported anomalously
high emissions of nickel from a painting line; contacts with the
facility established that the painting line did not emit nickel.

Source category classification (SCC) codes were defaulted where they
were missing based on process descriptions.

References

..	Primary Aluminum Actual and Allowable Emissions Modeling Files,
available as docket item: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0797-0143.

2.	Letter, Peter Tsirigotis (U.S. EPA) to Michael Palazollo (Alcoa) et
al., “Requirement to provide information according to Title 42 of the
United States Code, Chapter 85, Subchapter I, Part A, section 7414 (42
U.S.C 7414),” May 27, 2010. This was the cover letter for the
nine-company testing ICR.

23.	Letter, Peter Tsirigotis (U.S. EPA) to Russell Mayfield (Mayfield
Salvage Company) et al., “Requirement to provide information according
to 42 U.S.C 7414,” February 7, 2011. This was the cover letter for the
all-company data collection ICR.

List of Tables

  TOC \h \z \t "Table Title,1"    HYPERLINK \l "_Toc315702157"  Table
1.  	List of 155 Secondary Aluminum Production Facilities Modeled for
Residual Risk	  PAGEREF _Toc315702157 \h  8

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc315702158"  Table 2.  	List of 6 Aluminum
Production Facilities Not Modeled for Secondary Aluminum Risk	  PAGEREF
_Toc315702158 \h  14

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc315702159"  Table 3.  	Secondary Aluminum Emission
Process Groups Modeled	  PAGEREF _Toc315702159 \h  16

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc315702160"  Table 4. 	Emission Standards for New and
Existing Affected Sources	  PAGEREF _Toc315702160 \h  17

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc315702161"  Table 5.  	Summary of Metallic HAP Test
Results	  PAGEREF _Toc315702161 \h  19

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc315702162"  Table 6.  	Summary of Organic HAP Test
Results, Allowable Emissions (kg/Mg charge)	  PAGEREF _Toc315702162 \h
21

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc315702163"  Table 7. 	Calculations for Conversion
Factors	  PAGEREF _Toc315702163 \h  22

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc315702164"  Table 8. 	Conversion Factor Summary
PAGEREF _Toc315702164 \h  28

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc315702165"  Table 9.  	Example of Allowable
Emissions Calculations	  PAGEREF _Toc315702165 \h  29

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc315702166"  Table 10. 	Example of Actual Emissions
Calculations	  PAGEREF _Toc315702166 \h  30

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc315702167"  Table 11. 	Default Pollutant Emission
Factors	  PAGEREF _Toc315702167 \h  31

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc315702168"  Table 12. 	Default Capacity Factors
PAGEREF _Toc315702168 \h  31

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc315702169"  Table 13. 	Allowable and Actual D/F
Emissions, Major Sources	  PAGEREF _Toc315702169 \h  32

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc315702170"  Table 14. 	Allowable and Actual D/F
Emissions, Area Sources	  PAGEREF _Toc315702170 \h  34

Table 1.  List of 155 Secondary Aluminum Production Facilities Modeled
for Residual Risk

RTI Number	Facility ID	Facility Name	Facility Address	Facility City
Facility State	Zip Code	Major/Area Source Status

2	NEI3AL01123SMA	SMA-Mayfield Salvage Co.	P.O. Box 129	Alexander City	AL
35011	Area

7	NEI3AL01109Ell	Ellis Metals	231 South	Brundidge	AL	36010	Area

11	NEI3AL01071Imp	Imperial Aluminum - Scottsboro	7525 Roy Owens Blvd.
Scottsboro	AL	35769	Area

17	NEI3AR05017Liv	Livingston Pecan & Metal Inc.	219 Commerce Street	Lake
Village	AR	71653	Area

18	NEI3AR05119Met	Metro Scrap Metals, Inc.	6915 Hwy. 70 E.	North Little
Rock	AR	72117	Area

20	NEI3AR05033Dav	Davis Iron & Metal	611 South 23rd Street	Van Buren	AR
72956	Area

23	NEI3AZ04019Amc	Amcep Metals Company	4484 East Tennessee Street	Tucson
AZ	85714	Area

25	NEI3CA06037Tho	Thorock Metals Company Inc.	435 East Weber Ave	Compton
CA	90222	Area

39	NEI3FL12115Al	Al'S Pick N Pull, Inc.	4801 Preymore Street	Osprey	FL
34229	Area

50	NEI3IA19061Dit	Dittmer's Recycling	19108 Herber Rd.	Dubuque	IA	52001
Area

53	NEI3IA19019Tou	Tournier's Recycling Inc.	1644 Nathan Bethel Ave.
Independence	IA	50644	Area

55	NEI3IA19195Buc	Buck's Auto Recycling	1541 A Hwy 9	Manly	IA	50456	Area

56	NEI3IA19097BG	B. G. Salvage	7141 Hurstville Rd.	Maquoketa	IA	52060
Area

63	NEI3IN18005Nik	Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc	6875 South Inwood Dr.
Columbus	IN	47201	Area

65	NEI3IN18089Uni	United Tranz Core LLC	1200 145th Street 4400 Homerlee
Ave.	East Chicago	IN	46312	Area

68	NEI3IN18069Tra	Transmetco, Inc.	1750 East Riverfork Drive	Huntington
IN	46750	Area

71	NEI3IN18169Met	Metal Source LLC	1743 S. Wabash St.	Wabash	IN	46992
Area

72	NEI3IN18069Hea	Heartland Aluminum	706 East 9th Street	Warren	IN	46792
Area

73	NEI3KS20001Ray	Rays Metal Depot	320 W Highway 54	La Harpe	KS	66751
Area

74	NEI3KS20151Arn	Arnett Automotive	308 Pedigo	Pratt	KS	67124	Area

76	NEIKS20173DON	Donham Company	1631 S. Hoover Ct.	Wichita	KS	67209	Area

79	NEI11365	Rio Tinto Alcan	9404 State Route 2096	Robards	KY	42452	Major

80	NEI3MA25013Cen	Center Street Auto	651 Center St.	Chicopee	MA	01013
Area

83	NEI3MA25023Mid	Middleboro Recycling	128 Bedford	Middleboro	MA	02346
Area

85	NEIMD24005MAR	Maryland Recycle Company	8920 Yellowbrick Road
Baltimore	MD	21237	Area

87	NEI3MD24031Mon	Montgomery Scrap	15000 Southlawn Dr.	Rockville	MD
20850	Area

89	NEI3MI26163AMP	AMP Recycling Inc.	411 South Fort	Detroit	MI	48217
Area

91	NEI3MI26077Kai	Kaiser Aluminum Fabricated Products, LLC	5205 Kaiser
Drive	Kalamazoo	MI	49048	Area

93	NEI3MN27063Ron	Ron Rehnelt Salvage	Berg Street	Lakefield	MN	56150
Area

95	NEI3MN27103Man	Mankato Iron & Metal Company	215 West Elm Street
Mankato	MN	56001	Area

97	NEI3MN27015New	New Ulm Steel & Recycling, Inc.	218 19th Street	New
Ulm	MN	56073	Area

101	NEI2MO097008	Commercial Metals Company	12th and Iowa Streets	Joplin
MO	64801	Area

112	NEI3NH33015Web	Weber Auto And Truck Parts Corp.	135 Island Pond Rd
Derry	NH	03038	Area

117	NEI3NY36001NH	N. H. Kelman, Inc.	41 Euclid Street	Cohoes	NY	12047
Area

118	NEI3NY36067Met	Metalico Aluminum Recovery	6223 Thompson Rd.	East
Syracuse	NY	13057	Area

120	NEI3AL01123Cre	Crestwood Metal Company	1100 Lincoln Avenue	Holbrook
NY	11741	Major

124	NEI3NY360991Luf	Luffman Metal Company	2790 Thorpe Road	Seneca Falls
NY	13148	Area

126	NEI3OH39049G-C	G-Cor Automotive	2100 Refugee Road	Columbus	OH	43207
Area

134	NEI3OH39133Alu	Aluminum Wheel Technologies, Inc.	446 W Lake St.
Ravenna	OH	44266	Area

135	NEI3OH39023Sta	Staker Alloys	1075 James St.	Springfield	OH	45503
Area

136	NEI3OH39023Cit	City Wide Towing And Auto Wrecking	930 Dayton Ave.
Springfield	OH	45506	Area

138	NEI3OH39099Div	Diver-Steel City Auto Crushers	590 Himrod Avenue
Youngstown	OH	44506	Area

141	NEI3OK40101Yaf	Yaffe Iron & Metal Co., Inc.	Corner G and Lexington
Ave	Muskogee	OK	74403	Area

145	NEI3PA42051Ass	Assad Iron & Metals, Inc.	Albany Road	Brownsville	PA
15417	Area

154	NEI3PA42011Rea	Reading Alloys Inc. - Robesonia	Old W Penn Ave
Robesonia	PA	19551	Area

156	NEI3PA42133Pen	Pennex Aluminum Company	50 Community Street
Wellsville	PA	17365	Area

164	NEI3TN47113Mos	Most, Inc. - Jackson	355 James Lawrence Road	Jackson
TN	38301	Area

165	NEI3TN47059MD	MD Recycling, Inc.	1230 Pottertown Road	Midway	TN
37809	Area

167	NEITN1190123	Tennessee Aluminum Processors, Inc.	7207 Hoover Mason
Road	Mount Pleasant	TN	38474-1037	Area

169	NEI3TN47123Val	Valley Recycling	325 Industrial Park Road	Sweetwater
TN	37874	Area

173	NEI3TX48113Bis	Bishop Engine And Automotive	Building B 224 North
Corinth Street	Dallas	TX	75203	Area

190	NEI3WI55075Kar	Karl Schmidt Unisia, Inc.	1731 Industrial Parkway
Marinette	WI	54143	Area

191	NEIWI079241213720	Miller Compressing Co	1640 W Bruce St	Milwaukee	WI
53204	Area

195A	NEI10933	Alcoa, Inc. (North plant)	2300 North Wright Rd	Alcoa	TN
37701	Major

195B	NEI10933b	Alcoa, Inc. (South plant)	300 North Hall Rd	Alcoa	TN
37701	Major

196	NEI3TN47119Sme	Smelter Service Corp.	400 Arrow Mines Rd	Mount
Pleasant	TN	38474-1605	Area

198	NEI3KY21151Nov	Novelis Corporation	302 Mayde Rd	Berea	KY	40403	Major

199	NEI11360	Southwire Co	1987 State Route 271 North	Hawesville	KY	42348
Major

200	NEI11362	Aleris Rolled Products, Inc.	1372 State Route 1957
Lewisport	KY	423510480	Major

203	NEI11394	Kaiser Aluminum Fabricated Products, LLC	600 Kaiser Drive
Heath	OH	43056	Area

207	NEI12240	Alcoa Inc.	4879 State St	Riverdale	IA	52722	Major

210	NEI1532	Golden Aluminum Inc.	1405 East 14th Street	Fort Lupton	CO
80621-2718	Area

211	NEI18317	Hydro Aluminum Wells - Monett	120 Industrial Drive	Monett
MO	65708	Major

212	NEI3AZ04013Hal	Halna, Inc.	249 S. 51st Ave.	Phoenix	AZ	85043	Area

213	NEI3CA06001Cus	Custom Alloy Scrap Sales, Inc.	2730 Peralta St.
Oakland	CA	94607	Area

222	NEI22948	Vista Metals Corporation	13425 Whittram Ave	Fontana	CA
92335	Area

224	NEI3AR05115JW	JW Aluminum Company	777 Tyler Road	Russellville	AR
72802	Major

225	NEI2AZT18161	Alcoa Forgings	6833 W. Willis Rd.	Chandler	AZ	85226
Area

228	NEI2IA01-089	Nichols Aluminum Casting	2101 JM Morris Blvd	Davenport
IA	52802	Major

231	NEI3MI26145Ale	Aleris Specification Alloys, Inc.	2600 Nodular Drive
Saginaw	MI	48601	Area

232	NEI3MI26023Ale	Aleris Recycling, Inc/Aleris Specification Alloys,
Inc.	368 West Garfield Avenue	Coldwater	MI	49036	Major

248	NEI3OH39019Alu	Aluminum One	217 Roosevelt St	Minerva	OH	44657-1541
Area

252	NEI3PA42075Bec	Beck Aluminum Alloys	24 Keystone Dr	Lebanon	PA
17042-9791	Area

253	NEI3TN47105Ale	Aleris Recycling, Inc.	388 Williamson Dr	Loudon	TN
37774	Area

255	NEI3TX48181Kai	Kaiser Aluminum Fabricated Products, LLC	4300 S Sam
Rayburn Fwy	Sherman	TX	75090-9311	Area

256	NEI2TXT17701	Hydro Aluminum	2000 Economic Drive	Commerce	TX	75428
Area

257	NEI31872	Scepter, Inc.	6487 North Scepter Rd	Bicknell	IN	47512	Area

258	NEI32032	GM Powertrain Bedford Facility	105 GM Drive	Bedford	IN
47421	Area

260	NEI3IN18169Ale	Aleris Specification Alloys, Inc.	4525 West Old 24
Wabash	IN	46992-0466	Major

261	NEI32661	Alcoa Inc. - Warrick Operations	JCT Indiana Highways 66 &
61	Newburgh	IN	47630	Major

264	NEI34464	Noranda Aluminum, Inc.	391 Saint Jude Industrial Park	New
Madrid	MO	63869	Major

266	NEI3MO29510JW	JW Aluminum, St. Louis	6100 S. Broadway	St. Louis	MO
63111	Major

269	NEI3NY36075Nov	Novelis Corporation	448 County Rt 1A	Oswego	NY	13126
Major

270	NEI39458	Alcoa Massena Operations (West Plant)	Park Avenue East
Massena	NY	13662	Major

272	NEI41217	Alumax of SC, Incorporated	3575 Hwy 52 N	Goose Creek	SC
29445	Major

273	NEI3SC45015JW	JW Aluminum Co	2475 Trenton Ave	Williamsport	PA	17701
Major

274	NEI42328	Aluminum Co. of America - Wenatchee Works	6200 Malaga Alcoa
Hwy	Malaga	WA	98828	Major

276	NEI43018	Mercury Marine - Fond Du Lac Complex	W6250 W Pioneer Rd
Fond Du Lac	WI	54935	Major

278	NEI47821	Trialco, Inc.	900 E. 14th St.	Chicago Heights	IL	60411	Area

279	NEI3IL17031All	Allied Metal Co.	4528 W. Division Street	Chicago	IL
60616	Area

282	NEI3LA22083Sap	Sapa Extrusions, L.L.C.	142 Sapa Drive	Delhi	LA	71232
Area

283	NEI6464	Alcoa - Rockdale Operations	Market Road 1786	Rockdale	TX
76567	Major

284	NEI3TX48067Alu	Alumax Mill Products, Inc.	300 Alumax Dr	Texarkana	TX
75501	Major

288	NEI3PA42071Alu	Alumax Mill Products Inc.	1480 Manheim Pike	Lancaster
PA	17604	Major

289	NEI7212	Alcoa Mill Products - San Antonio	14555 Old Corpus Christi
Road	Elmendorf	TX	78112	Major

291	NEI790	Sapa Extrusion	2500 Alumax Road	Yankton	SD	57078	Major

292	NEI8066	William L. Bonnell Co., Inc.	25 Bonnell St	Newnan	GA	30263
Major

294	NEI8093	Novelis Corporation	1261 Willow Run Rd.	Greensboro	GA
306420837	Major

298a	NEI8522	Wise Alloys LLC-Alloys Reclamation Plant	1009 Ford Road
Muscle Shoals	AL	35661	Major

298b	NEI8522b	Wise Alloys LLC - Alloys Plant	4805 Second St.	Muscle
Shoals	AL	35661	Major

299	NEI3TN47159Wil	William L. Bonnell Company, Inc.(The)	53 Hwy, Bonnell
Lane	Carthage	TN	38563	Major

302	NEI3AL01055Ten	Tennessee Aluminum Processors, Inc.	205 Spurline Dr
Gadsden	AL	35903-3476	Area

303	NEIALT$4622	Aleris Specifiation Alloys, Inc.	47 Brogdon Rd	Steele	AL
35987	Major

305	NEIART$10783	Reynolds Foil Inc, dba reynolds Consumer Products
Company	1333 Hwy. 270	Malvern	AR	72104	Major

306	NEIAZ354	Imsamet of Arizona	3829 S. Estrella Pky.	Goodyear	AZ	85338
Area

307	NEI3CA06037Cus	Custom Alloy Light Metals	13329 Ector Street	City Of
Industry	CA	91746	Area

310	NEI3CA06071TST	TST, Inc.	11601 Etiwanda Ave	Fontana	CA	92337	Area

312	NEICAT$12566	Kaiser Aluminum & Chem Corp.	6250 E. Bandini Blvd.	Los
Angeles	CA	90040	Area

314	NEICO1011137	Dionisio Metal and Iron, Inc.	1004 Palo Alto Street
Pueblo Area	CO	81001	Area

316	NEIFL1030114	Metal Industries, Inc.	301 Commerce Blvd	Oldsmar	FL
34677	Area

318	NEIFL1090013	Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc	200 Riviera Blvd.	St
Augustine	FL	32086	Area

322	NEI3ID16055Ale	Aleris Recycling	16168 W Prairie Ave	Post Falls	ID
83854	Area

324	NEI3IL17031Ale	Aleris Recycling	400 E. Lincoln Hwy.	Chicago Heights
IL	60411	Major

329	NEI3IL17091KB	KB Cores - Kankakee	288 W South Tec Dr	Kankakee	IL
60901	Area

335	NEI3IN18089Jup	Jupiter Aluminum Corporation	1745 - 165th Street
Hammond	IN	46320	Major

336	NEIIN00286	Superior Aluminum Alloys	14214 Edgerton Road	New Haven	IN
46774	Major

338	NEI3IN18093Rec	Recycling Services of Indiana	4635 Peerless Rd
Bedford	IN	47421	Major

339	NEIIN1690003	Aleris Recycling - Wabash Operations	305 Dimension Ave
Wabash	IN	46992	Area

341	NEIIN567	Aluminum Recovery Technologies, Inc.	2170 Production Road
Kendalville	IN	46755	Major

344	NEIKY0090065	J.L. French Corp	20 Prestwick Drive	Glasgow	KY	42141
Major

345	NEI3KY21017Ken	Kentucky Smelting Technology, Inc.	140 Bellafato Dr
Paris	KY	40361	Area

347	NEIKY1010130	Hydro Aluminum - Louisville	5801 Riverport Rd	Henderson
KY	42420	Area

348	NEIKY101233	Audubon Metals, L.L.C.	3055 Ohio Drive	Henderson	KY
42420	Area

349	NEIKY2103100	Aleris Recycling, Inc.	609 Gardner Camp Road
Morgantown,	KY	42261	Major

351	NEIKY2114100	Logan Aluminum	6920 Lewisburg Rd	Russellville	KY	42276
Major

352	NEIKY22700135	Owl's Head Alloys, Inc	187 Mitch McConnell Drive
Bowling Green	KY	42101-7519	Major

354	NEIKY938	Electro Cycle, Inc.	230 Baldwin Drive	Madisonville	KY	42431
Area

363	NEIMIN5957	Aleris Recycling	267 N. Fillmore Rd	Coldwater	MI	49036
Major

364	NEIMIN6013	Continental Aluminum	29201 Milford Rd.	New Hudson	MI
48165	Area

369	NEIMO1130046	Most, Inc. - Troy	50 Cherry Blossom Way	Troy	MO	63379
Area

372	NEIMST$5321	Taber Metals Gulfport L.P.	1900 34th Street	Gulfport	MS
39501	Area

375	NEI3NJ34007Alu	Aluminum Shapes, L.L.C.	9000 River Rd	Delair	NJ
08110-3296	Major

376	NEINJR50539	State Metal Industries, Inc.	941 South Second St	Camden
NJ	08103	Area

381	NEI3NY360991Sce	Scepter Inc. - Seneca Falls Operations	11 Lamb Road
Seneca Falls	NY	13148	Area

384	NEIOH15144601GNWLM13	GNW Aluminum, Inc.	1356 Harrisburg Rd	Alliance
OH	44601	Area

385	NEI3OH39165Qua	Quantum Metals	3675 Taft Ave.	Lebanon	OH	45036	Area

389	NEI3OH39157Ale	Aleris Recycling	7335 Newport Road SE	Uhrichsville	OH
44683	Major

390	NEIOHT$6308	Aleris Rolled Products Inc.	7319 Newport Rd. S.E.
Uhrichsville	OH	44683	Major

392	NEIOK1832	Aleris Recycling, Inc.	1508 N. 8th Street	Sapulpa	OK	74067
Area

394	NEI3PA42125Rit	Ritchey Metals Co., Inc. - Hendersonville Plant	30
Georgetown Rd	Hendersonville	PA	15339	Area

395	NEIPA23-2083	Sapa Extrusions	53 Pottsville St.	Cressona	PA	17929
Major

398	NEIAL01073Ber	Berman Brothers Iron & Metal 	616 North 33rd Place
Birmingham	AL	35222	Area

401	NEI3TN47085Sce	Scepter, Inc.	1485 Scepter Ln	Waverly	TN	37185-3290
Area

404	NEITNT$5135	Norandal USA, Inc.	400 Bill Brooks Drive	Huntingdon	TN
38344	Area

405	NEI3UT49049Sap	Sapa Extrusions, Inc.	1550 N Kirby Ln	Spanish Fork	UT
84660	Area

407	NEI3VA51041Ale	Aleris Rolled Products, Inc.	1801 Reymet Road
Richmond	VA	23237-3794	Area

408	NEIWA0630023	Kaiser Aluminum Washington	15000 E Euclid	Spokane	WA
99216	Area

409	NEIWA19906	Intalco Aluminum Corp Ferndale	4050 Mountain View Rd
Ferndale	WA	98248	Major

412	NEI3WI55071BB	B & B Metals Processing Co.	14520 Pioneer Rd.	Newton
WI	53063	Area

415	NEI3WI15500JL	J. L. French Corp.	4243 Gateway Drive	Sheboygan	WI
53081	Major

416	NEIWI4600412	J. L. French Corp.	3101 South Taylor Dr	Sheboygan	WI
53081	Major

420	NEIWIT$8394	Beck Aluminum Racine	1349 23rd St	Racine	WI	53403	Area

421	NEIWV0043	Alcan Rolled Products, L.L.C. 	Route 2 South	Ravenswood	WV
26164	Major

422	NEI3WV54095Ale2	Aleris Recycling, Inc.	3816 S State Rt 2	Friendly	WV
26146	Area

423	NEI3WV54095Ale1	Aleris Recycling Bens Run LLC	4203 S State Rt 2
Friendly	WV	26146	Area

Table 2.  List of 6 Aluminum Production Facilities Not Modeled for
Secondary Aluminum Risk

RTI Number	Facility ID	Facility Name	Facility Address	Facility City
Facility State	Zip Code	Major/Area Source Status

6

Bermco Bros Iron & Metal Co.	2201 Fifth Avenue, North	Bessemer	AL	35020
Area

69

Alcoa Inc - Lafayette Operations	3131 East Main Street	Lafayette	IN
47905	Area

163

Bodine Aluminum - Tennessee	301 James Lawrence Rd	Jackson	TN	38301	Area

208	NEI12468	Columbia Falls Aluminum Co.	2000 Aluminum Drive	Columbia
Falls	MT	59912	Major

360	NEIMIB6178	Huron Valley Steel Corp	41000 Huron River Dr	Belleville
MI	48111	Area

362	NEIMIM4547	Fritz Products	255 Marion	River Rouge	MI	48218	Area

Table 3.  Secondary Aluminum Emission Process Groups Modeled

Emission

Processing

Group	Description

1	Aluminum Scrap Shredder

2	Group 1 furnace – handling clean charge only

3	Group 1 furnace – handling other than clean charge

4	In-line fluxer

5	Rotary dross cooler

6	Scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln

7	Sweat furnace

8	Thermal chip dryer

Table 4. Emission Standards for New and Existing Affected Sources

Affected source/ Emission unit	Pollutant	Limit	Units

All new and existing affected sources and emission units that are
controlled with a PM add-on control device and that choose to monitor
with a Continuous Opacity Monitor (COM) and all new and existing
aluminum scrap shredders that choose to monitor with a COM or to monitor
visible emissions	Opacity	10	Percent

New and existing aluminum scrap shredder	PM	0.01	gr/dscf

New and existing thermal chip dryer	THC

D/Fa	0.80

2.50	lb/ton of feed

µg TEQ/Mg of feed

New and existing scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln

                            Or	PM

HCl

THC

D/Fa	0.08

0.80

0.06

0.25	lb/ton of feed

lb/ton of feed

lb/ton of feed

µg TEQ/Mg of feed

Alternative limits if afterburner has a design residence time of at
least 1 second and operates at a temperature of at least 1400 °F	PM

HCl

THC

D/Fa	0.30

1.50

0.20

5.0	lb/ton of feed

lb/ton of feed

lb/ton of feed

µg TEQ/Mg of feed

New and existing sweat furnace	D/Fa	0.80	ng TEQ/dscm @ 11% O2b

New and existing dross-only furnace	PM	0.30	lb/ton of feed

New and existing in-line fluxerc 	HCl

PM	0.04

0.01	lb/ton of feed

lb/ton of feed

New and existing in-line fluxer with no reactive fluxing

No limit	Work practice: no reactive fluxing

New and existing rotary dross cooler	PM	0.04	gr/dscf

New and existing clean furnace (Group 2)

No limit	Work practices: clean charge only and no reactive fluxing

New and existing group 1 melting/holding furnace (processing only clean
charge)c 	PM

HCl	0.80

0.40

or

10	lb/ton of feed

lb/ton of feed

percent of the HCl upstream of an add-on control device

New and existing group 1 furnacec 	PM

HCl

	0.40

0.40

or

10	lb/ton of feed

lb/ton of feed

percent of the HCl upstream of an add-on control device

	D/Fa	15.0	µg TEQ/Mg of feed

New and existing group 1 furnacec with clean charge only	PM

HCl	0.40

0.40

or	lb/ton of feed

lb/ton of feed

10	percent of the HCl upstream of an add-on control device

	D/Fa	No Limit	Clean charge only

New and existing secondary aluminum processing unita,d (consists of all
existing group 1 furnaces and existing in-line flux boxes at the
facility, or all simultaneously constructed new group 1 furnaces and new
in-line fluxers)	PMe

	HClf

a D/F limit applies to a unit at a major or area source.

b Sweat furnaces equipped with afterburners meeting the specifications
of §63.1505(f)(1) are not required to conduct a performance test.

c These limits are also used to calculate the limits applicable to
secondary aluminum processing units.

d Equation definitions: LiPM = the PM emission limit for individual
emission unit i in the secondary aluminum processing unit [kg/Mg
(lb/ton) of feed]; Ti = the feed rate for individual emission unit i in
the secondary aluminum processing unit; LtPM = the overall PM emission
limit for the secondary aluminum processing unit [kg/Mg (lb-ton) of
feed]; LiHCl = the HCl emission limit for individual emission unit i in
the secondary aluminum processing unit [kg/Mg (lb/ton) of feed]; LtHCl =
the overall HCl emission limit for the secondary aluminum processing
unit [kg/Mg (lb/ton) of feed]; LiD/F = the D/F emission limit for
individual emission unit i [µg TEQ/Mg (gr TEQ/ton) of feed]; LtD/F =
the overall D/F emission limit for the secondary aluminum processing
unit [µg TEQ/Mg (gr TEQ/ton) of feed]; n = the number of units in the
secondary aluminum processing unit.

e In-line fluxers using no reactive flux materials cannot be included in
this calculation since they are not subject to the PM limit.

f In-line fluxers using no reactive flux materials cannot be included in
this calculation since they are not subject to the HCl limit.

g Clean charge furnaces cannot be included in this calculation since
they are not subject to the D/F limit.

Table 45.  Summary of Metallic HAP Test Results

Metallic HAP	Concentration in Particulate (mg/kg)

	Aluminum Scrap Shredder	Thermal Chip Dryer	Scrap Dryer/ Delacquering/
Decoating Kiln	Group 1 Furnace --Handling otherOther than clean
chargeClean Charge	Group 1 Furnace -- Clean charge onlyCharge Only
Dross-only Furnace	In-line Fluxer

NUMBER OF SAMPLES	7 (^6)	8	9 (^8)	9(^10)	9(^10)	1	1

	min	ave	max	min	ave	max	min	ave	max	min	ave	max	min	ave	max	min	ave	max
min	ave	max

Antimony	3.5	9.2	24	8.5*	34.1	191	2.4	55.6	340	0.5*	18.6	78	0.5*	18.6	78
0.5*	0.5	0.5	0.5*	0.5	0.5

Arsenic	1.6	6.3	16	0.9*	449.1	1370	0.5*	4.3	44	0.5*	1.9	9.1	0.5*	1.9	9.1
0.5*	0.5	0.5	0.5*	0.5	0.5

Beryllium	0.5*	1.4^	04.9	0.2.0*	0.59	3.2	0.1*	2	3.3	0.5*	0.5	0.7	0.5*
0.5	0.7	2.8	0.52.8	2.8	0.5*	0.5	0.5

Cadmium	0.5*	39.1	99	0.7	17.1	42.1	0.9	34.8	48	0.5*	13.4	51	0.5*	13.4
0.551	0.5*	0.5	0.5	1.9	1.9	1.9

Chromium III	59	289^	540	16.1	458	1300	16.1	168	360	4.5	11	25	4.5	11	25
460	460	460	4	4	4

Chromium VI	0.0*	0.2^	0.3	0.0*	3.6	11.6	0.0*	0.2	0.5	0.0*	0.2^	0.3	0.0*
0.2^	0.3	0.3*	0.3	0.3	0.3*	0.3	0.3

Cobalt	2.7	14.0	47	5.1*	28.8	71	1.7	9.4	37.1	0.5*	1.3	4.3	0.5*	1.3	4.3
2.0	1.12	2	1.1	1.1	1.1

Lead	935.723	2767.8936^	416.72000	3.5	2768	7400	108	417	2500	2	32.7	130
2	32.7	130	4.9	0.54.9	4.9	0.5*	0.5	0.5

Manganese	960	1275^	2000	53.8	2053	4030	48	627	1370	41	101	187	41	101
187	3400	3400	3400	100	100	100

Mercury, elemental	0.02	0.534	0.0761.36	0.48704*	0.08	0.46	0.1	0.49	2
0.008*	0.191^	0.88	0.008*	0.191^	0.88	0.008*	0.01	0.01	0.008*	0.008
0.008

Mercury, gaseous	0	0.067	0.01017	0.06100*	0.01	0.06	0.01	0.06	0.25
0.001*	0.024^	0.11	0.001*	0.024^	0.11	0.001*	0	0	0.001*	0.001	0.001

Mercury, particulate	0	0.067	0.01017	0.06100*	0.01	0.06	0.01	0.06	0.25
0.001*	0.024^	0.11	0.001*	0.024^	0.11	0.001*	0	0.01	0.001*	0.001	0.001

Nickel	34.5	118	280	20.1	1090	6670	9.4	79	190	4.7	13	24	4.7	13	24	27	27
27	14	14	14

Selenium	0.5*	1.6	3.9	0.5*	15.8	91.9	0.5*	23.1^	4.126	0.5*	4.1	0.514
1.90.5*	4.1	14	0.5*	0.5	0.5	1.9	1.9	1.9

Table 5.  Summary of Organic HAP Test Results, Allowable Emissions
(kg/Mg charge)

1 ^ indicates that the number of samples for this pollutant was
different than for other pollutants. For example, for a scrap shredder,
the antimony value was based on seven samples, where the beryllium value
was based on six samples.

2 * indicates that some values were below the detection limit and were
calculated by the method detection limit devideddivided by two.

Table 6.  Summary of Organic HAP Test Results, Allowable Emissions
(kg/Mg charge)

Organic HAP	Thermal Chip Dryer	Scrap Dryer/ Delacquering/ Decoating Kiln

	n*	Min	Ave	Max	n	Min	Ave	Max

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

Acrylonitrile   107-13-1	6	3.76E-05	9.89E-04	1.94E-03	7	2.42E-05
1.51E-03	3.33E-03

Benzene   71-43-2	12	4.28E-06	2.57E-03	4.52E-03	8	4.06E-03	5.29E-03
7.19E-03

Bromodichloromethane   75-27-4	6	3.24E-06	3.24E-06	3.24E-06	0	0.00E+00
0.00E+00	0.00E+00

Carbon disulfide   75-15-0	9	3.79E-05	1.06E-04	1.74E-04	8	8.08E-06
3.80E-03	1.07E-02

Carbon tetrachloride   56-23-5	9	3.57E-05	2.38E-04	4.39E-04	3	2.04E-05
2.04E-05	2.04E-05

Chlorodibromomethane   124-48-1	6	4.62E-06	4.62E-06	4.62E-06	0
0.00E+00	0.00E+00	0.00E+00

Chloroform  67-66-3	12	3.15E-06	2.43E-04	3.90E-04	6	6.96E-05	3.05E-04
6.97E-04

Chloroprene  126-99-8	3	7.34E-06	7.34E-06	7.34E-06	0	0.00E+00	0.00E+00
0.00E+00

Dibromomethane   74-95-3	4	5.29E-06	1.21E-04	2.38E-04	0	0.00E+00
0.00E+00	0.00E+00

1,1-Dichloroethane   75-34-3	6	3.24E-06	3.24E-06	3.24E-06	0	0.00E+00
0.00E+00	0.00E+00

1,2-Dichloroethane  107-06-2	9	3.98E-06	5.13E-05	9.86E-05	3	2.07E-05
2.07E-05	2.07E-05

1,1-Dichloroethene   75-35-4	6	8.26E-06	8.26E-06	8.26E-06	0	0.00E+00
0.00E+00	0.00E+00

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene   156-60-5	4	1.31E-05	9.56E-05	1.78E-04	0
0.00E+00	0.00E+00	0.00E+00

1,2-Dichloropropane  78-87-5	6	4.04E-06	4.04E-06	4.04E-06	0	0.00E+00
0.00E+00	0.00E+00

1,3-Dichloropropene  542-75-6	4	8.18E-06	9.93E-05	1.90E-04	0	0.00E+00
0.00E+00	0.00E+00

Methylene chloride   75-09-2	15	4.78E-04	1.75E-03	4.75E-03	10	4.40E-04
1.44E-03	3.36E-03

Tetrachloroethene   127-18-4	12	9.10E-06	1.77E-04	3.97E-04	3	5.26E-05
5.26E-05	5.26E-05

Toluene   108-88-3	12	1.14E-05	1.31E-03	2.28E-03	7	4.38E-04	4.81E-03
1.38E-02

1,1,1-Trichloroethane   71-55-6	6	4.28E-06	4.28E-06	4.28E-06	0
0.00E+00	0.00E+00	0.00E+00

1,1,2-Trichloroethane   79-00-5	6	3.98E-06	3.98E-06	3.98E-06	0
0.00E+00	0.00E+00	0.00E+00

Trichloroethene   79-01-6	9	3.98E-06	9.62E-05	1.88E-04	3	2.48E-05
2.48E-05	2.48E-05

Trichlorofluoromethane   75-69-4	12	1.50E-05	5.06E-04	9.37E-04	6
5.06E-05	5.06E-04	1.11E-03

Semi-volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC)

Acenaphthene   83-32-9	12	0.00E+00	9.23E-06	2.50E-05	10	0.00E+00
4.05E-04	1.98E-03

Acenaphthylene   208-96-8	10	0.00E+00	3.88E-05	9.97E-05	11	0.00E+00
1.71E-03	7.96E-03

Anthracene   120-12-7	12	0.00E+00	8.12E-06	2.72E-05	9	0.00E+00
3.17E-04	1.28E-03

Benz(a)anthracene   56-55-3	9	0.00E+00	4.69E-07	1.46E-06	6	0.00E+00
1.08E-04	5.08E-04

Benzo(a)pyrene   50-32-8	8	0.00E+00	6.68E-07	2.25E-06	0	0.00E+00
0.00E+00	0.00E+00

Benzo(b)fluoranthene   205-99-2	12	0.00E+00	4.99E-06	1.60E-05	6
0.00E+00	7.90E-07	3.86E-06

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene   191-24-2	9	0.00E+00	2.62E-06	7.78E-06	4
0.00E+00	1.66E-04	8.29E-04

Benzo(k)fluoranthene   207-08-9	6	0.00E+00	3.07E-06	1.19E-05	0
0.00E+00	0.00E+00	0.00E+00

Chrysene   218-01-9	10	0.00E+00	3.59E-06	9.71E-06	7	0.00E+00	1.46E-04
6.98E-04

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene   53-70-3	7	0.00E+00	4.12E-07	1.23E-06	0
0.00E+00	0.00E+00	0.00E+00

Fluoranthene   206-44-0	13	9.84E-07	8.66E-05	2.41E-04	14	5.72E-06
8.48E-04	3.14E-03

Fluorene   86-73-7	14	2.79E-06	8.05E-05	2.65E-04	12	4.20E-06	4.69E-04
2.14E-03

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene   193-39-5	9	0.00E+00	5.04E-07	1.60E-06	0
0.00E+00	0.00E+00	0.00E+00

Naphthalene  91-20-3	15	4.03E-05	3.04E-04	5.68E-04	15	1.42E-04	8.15E-02
4.05E-01

Phenanthrene   85-01-8	15	7.61E-06	2.11E-04	5.13E-04	15	1.58E-05
4.36E-03	1.96E-02

Pyrene   129-00-0	13	7.05E-07	4.89E-05	1.53E-04	10	6.38E-06	9.62E-04
3.98E-03

Table 67. Calculations for Conversion Factors

Table 78. Conversion Factor Summary

Equipment	Pollutant	Conversion Factor

(allowable tons of pollutant per ton of feed at the regulatory limit,
except where noted)

Thermal Chip Dryer	THC	1.00E-03

Thermal Chip Dryer	D/F	2.50E-12

Scrap Dryer/delacquering/decoating kiln	PM	1.50E-04

Scrap Dryer/delacquering/decoating kiln	HCl	7.50E-04

Scrap Dryer/delacquering/decoating kiln	THC	1.00E-03

Scrap Dryer/delacquering/decoating kiln	D/F	2.50E-13

Sweat furnace	D/F	3.70E-12

Aluminum Scrap Shredder	PM	3.75E-04*

Dross-only furnace	PM	1.50E-04

In-line fluxer 	HCl	2.00E-05

In-line fluxer 	PM	5.00E-06

Group 1 melting/holding furnace (processing only clean charge) 	PM
4.00E-04

Group 1 melting/holding furnace (processing only clean charge) 	HCl
2.00E-04

Group 1 Furnace—Handling other than clean charge	PM	2.00E-04

Group 1 Furnace—Handling other than clean charge	HCl	2.00E-04

Group 1 Furnace—Handling other than clean charge	D/F	1.50E-11

Group 1 Furnace—Clean charge only	PM	2.00E-04

Group 1 Furnace—Clean charge only	HCl	2.00E-04

* Scrap shredder conversion factor is in tons of emissions per dry
standard cubic foot per minute of stack gas flow.

Table 9.  Example of Allowable Emissions Calculations 8. Default
Emission Factors

Pollutant	Equipment	Emissions during testing	Standard	Units	Fraction,
test/standard

Dioxin/Furans	Group I furnace handling other than clean charge	2.16	15
ug/Mg	0.144

	Delacquering/decoating kiln	1.34	5	ug/Mg	0.269

	Chip dryer	0.277	2.5	ug/Mg	0.111

	Sweat Furnace	0.35	0.8	ng/dscm	0.438

PM	Group I furnace handling other than clean charge	0.184	0.4	lb/ton
0.460

	Group I furnace clean charge only	0.165	0.8	lb/ton	0.206

	Delacquering/decoating kiln	0.0390	0.3	lb/ton	0.130

	Scrap shredder	0.00757	0.01	gr/dscf	0.757

	Average	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.388

HCl	Group I furnace handling other than clean charge	0.0864	0.4	lb/ton
0.216

	Group I furnace handling only clean charge	0.144	0.4	lb/ton	0.360

	Delacquering/decoating kiln	0.259	1.5	lb/ton	0.173

	Average	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.266

THC	Delacquering/decoating kiln	0.0485	0.2	lb/ton	0.243

	Chip dryer	0.201	0.8	lb/ton	0.251

RTI Number	Pollutant	Equipment	Maximum Capacity (TPY)1

Conversion Factor2

HAP Concentration3

Allowable Emissions (TPY)

409	Antimony	Group 1 Furnace Handling Other than Clean Charge	32760	x
2.00E-04	x	18.6/1E+06	=	1.22E-04

409	HCl	Group 1 Furnace Handling Other than Clean Charge	32760	x
2.00E-04

	=	6.55

409	D/F as 2,3,7,8-TCDD TEQ	Group 1 Furnace Handling Other than Clean
Charge	32760	x	1.50E-11

	=	4.91E-07

276	Acrylonitrile	Thermal Chip Dryer	21600	x	1.00E-03	x	9.89E-04	=
2.14E-02

276	Acenaphthene	Thermal Chip Dryer	21600	x	1.00E-03	x	9.23E-06	=
1.99E-04

1 Maximum capacity values are from all-company ICR responses.

2 Conversion factors are from Table 78.

3 HAP concentrations are from nine-company testing ICR (see Table 45 for
metallic HAPs, and Table 56 for organic HAPs).

Table 11.10. Example of Actual Emissions Example Calculations

RTI Number	Pollutant	Equipment	Allowable Emissions (TPY)1

Reported Emissions/ Limit2

Production/ Maximum Capacity3

Actual Emissions (TPY)

409	Antimony	Group 1 Furnace Handling Other than Clean Charge	1.22E-04	x
0.052/0.4	x	1235/32760	=	5.98E-07

409	HCl	Group 1 Furnace Handling Other than Clean Charge	6.55	x
0.037/0.4	x	1235/32760	=	2.28E-02

409	D/F as 2,3,7,8-TCDD TEQ	Group 1 Furnace Handling Other than Clean
Charge	4.91E-07	x	0.48/15	x	1235/32760	=	5.92E-10

276	Acrylonitrile	Thermal Chip Dryer	2.14E-02	x	0.022/0.8	x	6953/21600	=
1.89E-04

276	Acenaphthene	Thermal Chip Dryer	1.99E-04	x	0.022/0.8	x	6953/21600	=
1.76E-06

1 See Table 109 for allowable emissions.

2 Reported emissions are from ICR responses. Emissions limits are from
the standards (see Table 34).

3 Production values for latest year are from the ICR responses. Maximum
production capacities are also from ICR responses.

Table 11. Default Pollutant Emission Factors

Pollutant	Equipment	Emission rate  during testing	Rule limits	Units1
Fraction, test/standard

Dioxin/Furans	Group I furnace handling other than clean charge	2.16	15
ug/Mg	0.144

	Delacquering/decoating kiln	1.34	5	ug/Mg	0.269

	Chip dryer	0.277	2.5	ug/Mg	0.111

	Sweat Furnace	0.35	0.8	ng/dscm	0.438

PM	Group I furnace handling other than clean charge	0.184	0.4	lb/ton
0.460

	Group I furnace clean charge only	0.165	0.8	lb/ton	0.206

	Delacquering/decoating kiln	0.0390	0.3	lb/ton	0.130

	Scrap shredder	0.00757	0.01	gr/dscf	0.757

	Average	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.388

HCl	Group I furnace handling other than clean charge	0.0864	0.4	lb/ton
0.216

	Group I furnace handling only clean charge	0.144	0.4	lb/ton	0.360

	Delacquering/decoating kiln	0.259	1.5	lb/ton	0.173

	Average	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.266

THC	Delacquering/decoating kiln	0.0485	0.2	lb/ton	0.243

	Chip dryer	0.201	0.8	lb/ton	0.251

1 Units for emission rate during testing are the same as the units for
the rule limits.

Table 12. Default Capacity Factors

Equipment	Capacity Factor

(Actual production versus production capacity)

Group I furnace handling only clean charge	0.493

Group I furnace handling other than clean charge	0.467

Sweat Furnace	0.412

Delacquering/decoating kiln	0.370

Chip dryer	0.342

Scrap Shredder	0.317

	Average	0.400

Table 13. Allowable and Actual D/F Emissions, Major Sources

RTI Number	Facility Name	TEQ Dioxin/Furan Emissions (TPY)

Allowable Emissions	Actual

 Emissions

120	Crestwood Metal Company	8.18E-09	4.86E-09

195A	Alcoa, Inc. (North plant)	2.17E-06	1.55E-08

195B	Alcoa, Inc. (South plant)	7.27E-06	6.47E-08

198	Novelis Corporation	5.99E-08	6.09E-12

199	Southwire Co	2.25E-06	2.25E-06

200	Aleris Rolled Products, Inc.	6.89E-06	6.94E-07

207	Alcoa Inc.	8.96E-06	7.24E-07

211	Hydro Aluminum Wells - Monett	1.49E-06	5.55E-08

224	JW Aluminum Company	4.92E-07	8.11E-08

228	Nichols Aluminum Casting	1.57E-05	1.29E-06

232	Aleris Recycling, Inc/Aleris Specification Alloys, Inc.	1.03E-06
2.66E-08

260	Aleris Specification Alloys, Inc.	5.51E-06	2.45E-07

261	Alcoa Inc. - Warrick Operations	3.45E-05	1.58E-07

269	Novelis Corporation	1.11E-05	1.14E-06

270	Alcoa Massena Operations (West Plant)	1.49E-06	9.47E-07

272	Alumax of SC, Incorporated	1.12E-06	5.63E-11

273	JW Aluminum Co	1.64E-06	3.14E-07

274	Aluminum Co. of America - Wenatchee Works	1.69E-06	9.66E-09

276	Mercury Marine - Fond Du Lac Complex	2.70E-08	3.55E-09

284	Alumax Mill Products, Inc.	1.39E-06	1.56E-07

288	Alumax Mill Products Inc.	6.75E-06	4.48E-07

289	Alcoa Mill Products - San Antonio	1.99E-06	1.04E-08

291	Sapa Extrusion	1.48E-06	7.30E-08

292	William L. Bonnell Co., Inc.	5.81E-07	3.06E-08

294	Novelis Corporation	5.18E-06	1.35E-06

298a	Wise Alloys LLC-Alloys Reclamation Plant	2.93E-06	7.02E-08

299	William L. Bonnell Company, Inc.(The)	8.75E-07	5.73E-09

303	Aleris Specifiation Alloys, Inc.	1.15E-06	8.02E-07

305	Reynolds Foil Inc, dba reynolds Consumer Products Company	2.22E-06
4.88E-12

324	Aleris Recycling	5.25E-07	1.09E-08

335	Jupiter Aluminum Corporation	2.01E-06	1.41E-08

336	Superior Aluminum Alloys	3.74E-06	9.08E-07

338	Recycling Services of Indiana	6.43E-07	1.95E-09

341	Aluminum Recovery Technologies, Inc.	8.66E-07	2.72E-13

344	J.L. French Corp	8.54E-07	1.06E-09

349	Aleris Recycling, Inc.	2.42E-06	3.54E-07

351	Logan Aluminum	8.99E-07	2.01E-12

352	Owl's Head Alloys, Inc	3.98E-07	2.22E-07

363	Aleris Recycling	8.40E-07	9.54E-09

375	Aluminum Shapes, L.L.C.	1.97E-06	7.61E-10

389	Aleris Recycling	2.64E-06	5.87E-07

395	Sapa Extrusions	2.66E-06	2.08E-06

409	Intalco Aluminum Corp Ferndale	2.46E-07	5.93E-10

415	J. L. French Corp.	1.98E-06	1.84E-07

416	J. L. French Corp.	3.01E-08	1.51E-08

421	Alcan Rolled Products, L.L.C. 	9.99E-06	1.58E-07

	Grand Total	1.54E-04	1.44E-05

Table 1314. Allowable and Actual D/F Emissions, Area Sources

RTI Number	Facility Name	TEQ Dioxin/Furan Emissions (TPY)

Allowable

 Emissions	Actual

-

G

|

Â

É

Í

Ù

ê

È

Ð

h

h

h

h

h

h

Ff

h

h

h

h

Ff|

h

h

h

Ff

h

h

h

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

€f

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

€f

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

€f

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

€f

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

€f

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

€f

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

€f

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

€f

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

€f

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

€f

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

€f

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

€f

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

€f

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

€f

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

€f

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

€f

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

€f

愀Ĥ摧ᗶ*

€f

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

愀Ĥ摧㼡p

KB Cores - Kankakee	1.11E-08	4.00E-09

339	Aleris Recycling - Wabash Operations	4.58E-07	6.16E-08

345	Kentucky Smelting Technology, Inc.	1.20E-06	3.41E-09

347	Hydro Aluminum - Louisville	9.74E-07	9.74E-07

348	Audubon Metals, L.L.C.	8.70E-09	7.21E-11

354	Electro Cycle, Inc.	7.58E-07	3.59E-09

364	Continental Aluminum	7.39E-07	2.67E-07

369	Most, Inc. - Troy	6.18E-07	1.04E-07

372	Taber Metals Gulfport L.P.	6.15E-07	2.48E-08

376	State Metal Industries, Inc.	5.60E-07	2.09E-07

381	Scepter Inc. - Seneca Falls Operations	4.60E-07	6.22E-08

384	GNW Aluminum, Inc.	3.89E-08	1.40E-08

385	Quantum Metals	3.93E-09	4.35E-10

392	Aleris Recycling, Inc.	7.88E-07	4.49E-07

394	Ritchey Metals Co., Inc. - Hendersonville Plant	4.50E-09	9.71E-10

398	Berman Brothers Iron & Metal 	4.28E-07	9.46E-08

401	Scepter, Inc.	7.88E-07	8.65E-08

404	Norandal USA, Inc.	3.38E-06	1.31E-07

405	Sapa Extrusions, Inc.	7.25E-07	1.05E-08

407	Aleris Rolled Products, Inc.	1.44E-06	1.35E-07

408	Kaiser Aluminum Washington	4.58E-06	6.45E-07

412	B & B Metals Processing Co.	1.33E-07	1.68E-09

420	Beck Aluminum Racine	3.94E-07	3.54E-10

422	Aleris Recycling, Inc.	4.86E-07	7.96E-08

423	Aleris Recycling Bens Run LLC	3.94E-07	4.47E-08

	Grand Total	4.28E-05	6.67E-06

  PAGE   \* MERGEFORMAT  2


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34638-34639]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14955]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0276; FRL-9927-37]

Draft Test Guidelines; Series 810--Product Performance Test
Guidelines; Notice of Availability and Request for Comments

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability for comment of several
810 series, non-binding, draft test guidelines developed by the Office
of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP). The test
guidelines provide guidance on conducting testing by the public and
companies that are subject to EPA data submission requirements under
OCSPP's major statutory mandates.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 17, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0276, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information contact:
Melissa

Chun, Regulatory Coordination Staff (7101M), Office of Chemical Safety
and Pollution Prevention, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 564-1605; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For technical information contact: Stephen Tomasino, Biological and
Economic Analysis Division (7503P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Science Center, 701
Mapes Road, Ft. Meade, MD 20755-5350; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. Although this
action may be of particular interest to those persons who are or may be
required to conduct testing of pesticides and other chemical substances
for submission of data to EPA under the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA), 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq., the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq., and/or the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a, the Agency has not
attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be affected by
this action. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult the technical person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed CBI. In addition to one complete
version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy
of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so
marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set
forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
    3. Electronic access to the OCSPP Test Guidelines. You may access
the guidelines in regulations.gov at http://www.regulations.gov,
grouped by series under docket ID numbers: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0150
through EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0159, and EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0576.

II. Background

    The test guidelines serve as a compendium of accepted scientific
methodologies and protocols that are intended to provide data to inform
regulatory decisions under TSCA, FIFRA, and/or FFDCA. The test
guidelines provide guidance for conducting the test, and are also used
by EPA, the public, and companies that are subject to data submission
requirements under TSCA, FIFRA, and/or FFDCA.
    As guidance documents, the test guidelines are not binding on
either EPA or any outside parties, and EPA may depart from the test
guidelines where circumstances warrant and without prior notice. At
places in these guidance documents, the Agency uses the word
``should.'' In these guidance documents, use of ``should'' with regard
to an action means that the action is recommended rather than
mandatory. The procedures contained in the test guidelines are
recommended for generating the data that are the subject of the test
guidelines, but EPA recognizes that departures may be appropriate in
specific situations. You may propose alternatives to the
recommendations described in the test guidelines, and the Agency will
assess them for appropriateness on a case-by-case basis.

III. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is making available for comment the following 810 Series draft
test guidelines: OCSPP Test Guideline 810.2000--General Considerations
for Testing Antimicrobial Agents, OCSPP Test Guideline 810.2100--
Sterilants & Sporicides Recommendations for Efficacy Testing, and OCSPP
Test Guideline 810.2200--Disinfectants for Use on Hard Surfaces--
Efficacy Data Recommendations.
    The Agency published the notice announcing the final test
guidelines for these product performance testing guidelines for
antimicrobial agents in the Federal Register of March 16, 2012 (77 FR
15750) (FRL-9332-4). Since then, the Agency has received information
from the users that these test guidelines are confusing and in some
cases, inaccurate. The test guidelines have been re-formatted to be
more user friendly, correct technical information, and include updates
from policy documents published after 2012. As noted in section I.B.3
of this notice, the public can access the guidelines in regulations.gov
at http://www.regulations.gov, grouped by series under docket ID
numbers: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0150 through EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0159, and EPA-
HQ-OPPT-2009-0576.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.; 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.; 21
U.S.C. 301 et seq.

    Dated: June 4, 2015.
James Jones,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015-14955 Filed 6-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 153 (Friday, August 7, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47963-47964]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17293]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-10012-33-Region 5]

Public Water System Supervision Program Approval for the State of
Wisconsin

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of tentative approval.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has tentatively approved a revision to the state of
Wisconsin's Public Water System Supervision Program under the federal
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) by adopting the Lead and Copper Rule
Short-term Revisions. The EPA has determined this revision is no less
stringent than the corresponding federal regulation. Therefore, the EPA
intends to approve this revision to the state of Wisconsin's Public
Water System Supervision Program, thereby giving Wisconsin Department
of Natural Resources primary enforcement responsibility for this
regulation. This approval action does not extend to public water
systems in Indian Country. By approving this rule, EPA does not intend
to affect the rights of federally recognized Indian Tribes in
Wisconsin, nor does it intend to limit existing rights of the state of
Wisconsin.

DATES: Any interested party may request a public hearing on this
determination. A request for a public hearing must be submitted by
September 8, 2020. The EPA Region 5 Administrator may deny frivolous or
insubstantial requests for a hearing. However, if a substantial request
for a public hearing is made by September 8, 2020, EPA Region 5 will
hold a public hearing, and a notice of

such hearing will be published in the Federal Register and a newspaper
of general circulation. Any request for a public hearing shall include
the following information: The name, address, and telephone number of
the individual, organization, or other entity requesting a hearing; a
brief statement of the requesting person's interest in the Regional
Administrator's determination and a brief statement of the information
that the requesting person intends to submit at such hearing; and the
signature of the individual making the request, or, if the request is
made on behalf of an organization or other entity, the signature of a
responsible official of the organization or other entity.
    If EPA Region 5 does not receive a timely and appropriate request
for a hearing and the Regional Administrator does not elect to hold a
hearing on his own motion, this determination shall become final and
effective on September 8, 2020 and no further public notice will be
issued.

ADDRESSES: All documents relating to this determination are available
for inspection at the following offices between the hours of 9 a.m. and
4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except for official holidays and unless
the offices are inaccessible due to COVID-19: Wisconsin Department of
Natural Resources, Public Water Supply Section, 101 S Webster St.,
Madison, WI 53707-7921; and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 5, Ground Water and Drinking Water Branch (WG-15J), 77 W Jackson
Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604. Requestors can email Janet Kuefler,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>to receive documents related to this
determination if offices are inaccessible.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet Kuefler, EPA Region 5, Ground
Water and Drinking Water Branch, at the address given above, by
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Authority: Section 1413 of the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C.
300g-2, and the federal regulations implementing Section 1413 of the
Act set forth at 40 CFR part 142.

    Dated: July 30, 2020.
Kurt Thiede,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2020-17293 Filed 8-6-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


From:  Allen Dittenhoefer<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Friday, February 12, 2021 2:10 PM To:  Raymond, Gabrielle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Contact<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Knight, Jeffrey A<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Kaplan, Mary<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:  Review of Whole Industry Test Data, Coke Byproduct Chemical Plant Emissions, and Revised Clairton Byproducts Spreadsheet

Hello Gabrielle,   Attached please find our comments on the latest Whole Industry Test Data and Coke Byproduct Chemical Plant spreadsheets, as well as a revised Byproducts spreadsheet for Clairton.   In the Whole Industry Test Data spreadsheet, we discovered that EPA apparently misinterpreted our Aug-Sept 2020 comments on the Erie Coke pushing test data and made push sample time adjustments to all of the pollutants, instead of just the dioxins and furans.  It is our understanding that the lb/hr emission rates in the Erie Coke pushing test report already accounted for pushing sampling time.  It was just the dioxins and furans emission rates that we believe EPA needed to correct in the August 2020 version of the spreadsheet.     For the Coke Byproducts Chemical Plant spreadsheet, we noted that we failed to include emissions from the Clairton aeration basin and byproducts pitch traps, which we have added.  Accordingly, we are including the revised stand-alone Clairton byproducts emissions spreadsheet that lists these emissions.  Please note that we have included these revised Clairton emissions in the "Clairton" tab of the industry byproducts spreadsheet.  The addition of these Clairton byproducts emissions was noted in the Coke 2017 EIS-NEI noncategory-other-units spreadsheet that Mary Kaplan is sending today, and we wanted to alert EPA of any inadvertent "double-counting" of these emissions.  We apologize for any inconvenience this has caused.   We have no comments on the Method 303, fugitive pushing, boilers, and flare emissions spreadsheets.   Best regards,   Allen C. Dittenhoefer, Ph.D. Principal

  Environmental Planning Specialists, Inc. 45 U.S. Highway 46 East Suite 601 Pine Brook, NJ 07058 Direct:<PHONE_NUMBER> (Ext. 12705) Mobile<PHONE_NUMBER> <EMAIL_ADDRESS>www.envplanning.com

<< CokeOvens-Enclosure 12 QA-Whole IndustryTest Data-POST-Aug 2020_COETF response rev_2-12-2021.xlsx >> << Coke_Byproduct_Chemical Plant_Emissions_01-25-2021 COETF response rev_02-12-2021.xlsx >> << Clairton ByProducts rev021021.xlsx >>


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 69 (Thursday, April 9, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 19939]
[FR Doc No: 2020-07492]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER20-1487-000]

Frontier Windpower II, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Frontier Windpower II, LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is April 23, 2020.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://ferc.gov) using the
eLibrary link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits
in the docket number field to access the document. At this time, the
Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public Reference
Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency concerning
the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the President on
March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY,
(202) 502-8659.

    Dated: April 3, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-07492 Filed 4-8-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 233 (Tuesday, December 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74689-74690]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26425]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-629, OMB Control No. 3235-0718]

Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension: Regulation SBSR

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange

Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing
collection of information provided for in Rules 901, 902, 903(a), 904,
905, 906, 907, and 908 of Regulation SBSR (17 CFR 242.901, 902, 903(a),
904, 905, 906, 907, and 908), under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.). The Commission plans to submit this existing
collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget
(``OMB'') for extension and approval.
    Regulation SBSR consists of ten rules, Rules 900 to 909 under the
Exchange Act. Regulation SBSR provides generally for the reporting of
security-based swap information to a registered security-based swap
data repository (``registered SDRs'') or to the Commission, and for the
public dissemination of security-based swap transaction, volume, and
pricing information by registered SDRs. Rule 901 specifies, with
respect to each reportable event pertaining to covered transactions,
who is required to report, what data must be reported, when it must be
reported, where it must be reported, and how it must be reported. Rule
901(a)(1) of Regulation SBSR requires a platform to report to a
registered SDR a security-based swap executed on such platform that
will be submitted to clearing. Rule 901(a)(2)(i) of Regulation SBSR
requires a registered clearing agency to report to a registered SDR any
security-based swap to which it is a counterparty. Rules 902 to 909 of
Regulation SBSR provide additional details as to how such reporting and
public dissemination is to occur.
    The Commission estimates that a total of approximately 30,348
entities will be impacted by Regulation SBSR, including registered
SDRs, registered security-based swap dealers, registered major
securities-based swap participants, registered clearing agencies,
platforms, and reporting sides and other market participants. The
Commission estimates that the total annual hour burden for Regulation
SBSR, for all respondents, is approximately 3,539,483 hours per year.
In addition, the Commission estimates that the total annual cost burden
for Regulation SBSR for all respondents is approximately $47,728,783
per year. A detailed break-down of the burdens applicable to each type
of entity is provided in the supporting statement.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in
writing by February 6, 2023.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    Please direct your written comments to: David Bottom, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o John
Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or send an email to:
[email protected].

    Dated: November 30, 2022.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-26425 Filed 12-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


From:	Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US
To:	"Higgins, Cortney"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc:	Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	12/01/2011 02:11 PM
Subject:	Re: Interagency comments on Boilers rules (both Major and  Area)

Cortney,

Here are our responses (for major sources) to this set of comments. I will send the responses to set of preamble edits shortly.

Thanks!

Brian

Strikeout Issue:
.              In the major source rule, are the values in the third column of Tables 1 and 2 to subpart DDDDD correct?  These have changed in recent versions, and we want to make sure the reg text is correct.

The limits are correct.

Definition of Qualified Energy Assessor:
.              In the area source rule Page 92/93. Consider deleting the words "for opportunity" after the word "opportunities."
.              In the major source rule on page 295: The definition should probably be the same as in the area source rule.

Change made.

Definition of EGU:
.              EPA revised the definition in the area source rule on page 88.  The definition in the major source rule on page 282 should probably be changed to match the area source rule.  The definition on page 821 of the EGU NESHAP might also need to be changed to match the area source rule.

Change made so that major matches the definition in area.

Other definitions also differ between the area and major source rules.
Some differences might be intentional but others might need to be changed to be consistent.  Definitions that differ that might need to be made more similar include (but may not be limited to):

Some differences are intentional due to differences in coverage of the rules (major covers gas units and process heaters while area does not).
I've indicated below where we have made changes.

.              Hot Water Heater-Added "Hot Water Boiler" sentence at end of definition
.              Liquid Fuel-no change
.              Period of gas curtailment or supply interruption-Changed major to match area source definition
.              Process Heater-no change
.              Residential Boiler (major source rule version might be best)-no change (area source changed to match major)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From:	"Higgins, Cortney"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>To:	Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim
            Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc:	RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	11/30/2011 03:48 PM
Subject:	Interagency comments on Boilers rules (both Major and Area)

Hi all,

I wanted to pass along these interagency comments on the latest drafts you've shared with us today.  I will also be sending a redline of the major source rule shortly, but thought I'd send these ahead of the
redline:

Strikeout Issue:
.              In the major source rule, are the values in the third column of Tables 1 and 2 to subpart DDDDD correct?  These have changed in recent versions, and we want to make sure the reg text is correct.

Definition of Qualified Energy Assessor:
.              In the area source rule Page 92/93. Consider deleting the words "for opportunity" after the word "opportunities."
.              In the major source rule on page 295: The definition should probably be the same as in the area source rule.

Definition of EGU:
.              EPA revised the definition in the area source rule on page 88.  The definition in the major source rule on page 282 should probably be changed to match the area source rule.  The definition on page 821 of the EGU NESHAP might also need to be changed to match the area source rule.

Other definitions also differ between the area and major source rules. Some differences might be intentional but others might need to be changed to be consistent.  Definitions that differ that might need to be made more similar include (but may not be limited to):
.              Hot Water Heater
.              Liquid Fuel
.              Period of gas curtailment or supply interruption
.              Process Heater
.              Residential Boiler (major source rule version might be best)

Regards,
Cortney


Tribal NSR Rules Training

EPA Region 10, Seattle

January 4 –5, 2007

Agenda

January 4, 2007

8:30-9:30 AM		Welcome (??)

			Introductions

			History of this Rulemaking (Laura McKelvey, OAQPS)

			Relationship to Region 10 FARR  (Debra Suzuki?, R10)

Alaskan Native Villages (Debra Suzuki?, R10)

			Expected Training Outcomes (Raj Rao & Laura OAQPS)

9:30-9:45 AM		BREAK

9:45-12.00 PM	NSR 101 and proposed NSR Rules (Raj)

NSR Basics Overview

			Overview of Minor NSR Program

			Overview of Major NSR Program

Questions and Answers

12.00 -1:15 PM	LUNCH (on your own)

1:15 – 3.00 PM	Permitting Examples (including Tribal sources examples), (Raj)

3.00-3.15 PM		BREAK

3:15-4:30 PM		Key Areas of the Rules to Note for Comment (Laura)

			Verification of Training Outcomes (Raj & Laura)

			Wrap-up and Adjourn

January 5, 2007

8:30-12:00 PM	Tribal Caucus (tribes and tribal organizations only with 	 			EPA-OAQPS staff on stand-by)

Tribes will outline basic concerns and comments for consideration