[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 149 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46137-46139]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18894]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-67529; File No. SR-NYSE-2012-30]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend the New York Stock Exchange LLC Price List To Establish Pricing
for the Retail Liquidity Program

July 27, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on July 18, 2012, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to establish pricing
for the Retail Liquidity Program. The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to establish pricing
for the Retail Liquidity Program, which has been approved by the
Commission to operate for one year as a pilot program.\3\ The Exchange
proposes to implement the fee changes on August 1, 2012. The Retail
Liquidity Program is designed to attract additional retail order flow
to the Exchange for NYSE-listed securities while also providing the
potential for price improvement to such order flow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67347 (July 3,
2012), 77 FR 40673 (July 10, 2012) (SR-NYSE-2011-55).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Two new classes of market participants were created under the
Retail Liquidity Program: (1) Retail Member Organizations
(``RMOs''),\4\ which are eligible to submit certain retail order flow
(``Retail Orders'') \5\ to

the Exchange, and (2) Retail Liquidity Providers (``RLPs''),\6\ which
are required to provide potential price improvement for Retail Orders
in the form of non-displayed interest (``Retail Price Improvement
Orders'' or ``RPIs'') \7\ that is better than the best protected bid
(``PBB'') or the best protected offer (``PBO'') (together, the
``PBBO'').\8\ Member organizations other than RLPs are also permitted,
but not required, to submit RPIs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ ``RMO'' is defined in NYSE Rule 107C(a)(2) as a member
organization (or a division thereof) that has been approved by the
Exchange to submit Retail Orders.
    \5\ ``Retail Order'' is defined in NYSE Rule 107C(a)(3) as an
agency order that originates from a natural person and is submitted
to the Exchange by an RMO, provided that no change is made to the
terms of the order with respect to price or side of market and the
order does not originate from a trading algorithm or any other
computerized methodology. A Retail Order is an Immediate or Cancel
Order and must operate in accordance with NYSE Rule 107C(k). A
Retail Order may be an odd lot, round lot or a partial round lot
(``PRL'').
    \6\ ``RLP'' is defined in NYSE Rule 107C(a)(1) as a member
organization that is approved by the Exchange to act as such and
that is required to submit Retail Price Improvement in accordance
with NYSE Rule 107C.
    \7\ ``RPI'' is defined in NYSE Rule 107C(a)(4) and consists of
non-displayed interest in NYSE-listed securities that is priced
better than the PBB or PBO, as such terms are defined in Regulation
NMS Rule 600(b)(57), by at least $0.001 and that is identified as
such. Exchange systems will monitor whether RPI buy or sell
interest, adjusted by any offset and subject to the ceiling or floor
price, is eligible to interact with incoming Retail Orders. An RPI
remains non-displayed in its entirety (the buy or sell interest, the
offset, and the ceiling or floor). An RLP may only enter an RPI for
securities to which it is assigned as RLP. An RPI may be an odd lot,
round lot or a PRL.
    \8\ The terms ``protected bid'' and ``protected offer'' have the
same meaning as defined in Regulation NMS Rule 600(b)(57). The PBB
is the best-priced protected bid and the PBO is the best-priced
protected offer. Generally, the PBB and PBO and the national best
bid (``NBB'') and national best offer (``NBO''), respectively, will
be the same. However, a market center is not required to route to
the NBB or NBO if that market center is subject to an exception
under Regulation NMS Rule 611(b)(1) or if such NBB or NBO is
otherwise not available for an automatic execution. In such case,
the PBB or PBO would be the best-priced protected bid or offer to
which a market center must route interest pursuant to Regulation NMS
Rule 611.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In proposing the Retail Liquidity Program, the Exchange stated that
it would submit a separate proposal to amend its Price List in
connection with the Retail Liquidity Program.\9\ Accordingly, the
Exchange proposes to adopt the following pricing:\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65672 (November 2,
2011), 76 FR 69788 (November 9, 2011) (SR-NYSE-2011-55).
    \10\ The Exchange notes that participation in the Retail
Liquidity Program is optional and, accordingly, the pricing proposed
herein would not apply to a member organization that does not choose
to participate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     RPIs of RLPs will be free if executed against Retail
Orders. The Exchange notes that, as provided under NYSE Rule
107(C)(f)(3), the percentage requirement thereunder is not applicable
in the first two calendar months that a member organization operates as
an RLP. Instead, the percentage requirement takes effect on the first
day of the third consecutive calendar month that the member
organization operates as an RLP. The Exchange proposes that, during the
first two calendar months that a member organization operates as an
RLP, the RLP's RPIs will be free if executed against Retail Orders,
regardless of the percentage of the trading day at which the RLP
maintains an RPI that is priced better than the PBBO. Thereafter, this
proposed rate would only be applicable if the RLP satisfies the
percentage requirement of NYSE Rule 107(C)(f). An RLP that does not
satisfy the percentage requirement of NYSE Rule 107(C)(f) would be
charged the $0.0003 per share rate described below for non-RLP member
organizations.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The Exchange notes that the RPI executions of a member
organization disqualified from acting as an RLP would thereafter be
subject to the transaction pricing applicable to non-RLP member
organizations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     RPIs of non-RLP member organizations will be charged
$0.0003 per share if executed against Retail Orders; provided, however,
that RPIs of non-RLP member organizations that execute an average daily
volume (``ADV'') \12\ during the month of at least 500,000 shares of
RPIs will be free if executed against Retail Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ ADV calculations exclude early closing days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Retail Orders of RMOs will receive a credit of $0.0005 per
share if executed against RPIs of RLPs and other member organizations.
The Exchange notes that an RMO submitting a Retail Order could choose
one of three ways for the Retail Order to interact with available
contra-side interest. First, a Type 1-designated Retail Order could
interact only with available contra-side RPIs. These Type 1-designated
Retail Orders would not interact with other available contra-side
interest in Exchange systems or route to other markets. Portions of a
Type 1-designated Retail Order that are not executed would be
cancelled. Second, a Type 2-designated Retail Order could interact
first with available contra-side RPIs and any remaining portion would
be executed as a non-routable Regulation NMS-compliant Immediate or
Cancel Order, which would sweep the Exchange's Book without being
routed to other markets, and any remaining portion would be cancelled.
Finally, a Type 3-designated Retail Order could interact first with
available contra-side RPIs and any remaining portion would be executed
as a routable NYSE Immediate or Cancel Order, which would sweep the
Exchange's Book and be routed to other markets, and any remaining
portion would be cancelled. A Retail Order that executes against the
Book will be charged according to the standard rate applicable to non-
Retail Orders, which is currently $0.0023 per share (or $0.0022 per
share if the RMO has satisfied the liquidity thresholds applicable to
such rate, as described in the Price List). Also, the standard routing
fee (i.e., $0.0030 per share) would apply to a Retail Order that is
routed away from the Exchange and executed on another market.
    The Exchange proposes that the pricing described herein be
applicable, unless otherwise amended at a later date, for so long as
the Retail Liquidity Program is in effect. Because the Retail Liquidity
Program has been approved to operate as a one-year pilot program, the
Exchange anticipates that it will periodically review this pricing to
seek to ensure that it contributes to the goal of the Retail Liquidity
Program, which is designed to attract additional retail order flow to
the Exchange for NYSE-listed securities while also providing the
potential for price improvement to such order flow.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
``Act''),\13\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,\14\ in particular, because it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among
its members and issuers and other persons using its facilities and does
not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers or
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it would establish
pricing designed to increase competition among execution venues,
encourage additional liquidity and offer the potential for price
improvement to retail investors. The Exchange notes that a significant
percentage of the orders of individual investors are executed over-the-
counter.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Concept Release on Equity Market Structure, Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 61358 (January 14, 2010), 75 FR 3594
(January 21, 2010) (noting that dark pools and internalizing broker-
dealers executed approximately 25.4% of share volume in September
2009). See also Mary L. Schapiro, Strengthening Our Equity Market
Structure (Speech at the Economic Club of New York, Sept. 7, 2010)
(available on the Commission's Web site). In her speech, Chairman
Schapiro noted that nearly 30 percent of volume in U.S.-listed
equities was executed in venues that do not display their liquidity
or make it generally available to the public and the percentage was
increasing nearly every month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the $0.0005 credit proposed herein for
executions of RMOs against RPIs is reasonable, equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because it will create a financial incentive to
bring additional

retail order flow to a public market. The Exchange also believes
applying standard non-Retail Order rates to Retail Orders that execute
against the Book or that are routed away from the Exchange and executed
on another market is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because these are the rates that would apply to such
orders, but for the Retail Order designation. The Exchange also
believes that not charging RLPs that satisfy the percentage requirement
of NYSE Rule 107(C)(f) for their executions of RPIs is reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it will incentivize
member organizations to become RLPs and therefore could result in
greater price improvement for Retail Orders. Similarly, the Exchange
believes that not charging non-RLP member organizations that execute an
ADV of at least 500,000 shares of RPIs during the month for their
executions of RPIs is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it will incentivize such non-RLPs to submit RPIs
for interaction with Retail Orders. Conversely, the Exchange believes
that charging RLPs and non-RLP member organizations that do not satisfy
the percentage requirements of NYSE Rule 107(C)(f) and the 500,000
share ADV threshold, respectively, is reasonable, equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because it will incentivize RLPs and non-RLPs
to submit RPIs and, therefore, contribute to robust amounts of RPI
liquidity being available for interaction with the Retail Orders
submitted by RMOs.
    While the Exchange believes that markets and price discovery
optimally function through the interactions of diverse flow types, it
also believes that growth in internalization has required
differentiation of retail order flow from other order flow types. The
pricing proposed herein, like the Retail Liquidity Program itself, is
not designed to permit unfair discrimination, but instead to promote a
competitive process around retail executions such that retail investors
would receive better prices than they currently do through bilateral
internalization arrangements. The Exchange believes that the
transparency and competitiveness of operating a program such as the
Retail Liquidity Program on an exchange market, and the pricing related
thereto, would result in better prices for retail investors.

 B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \16\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \17\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by NYSE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2012-30 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2012-30. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make publicly available. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2012-30 and should be
submitted on or before August 23, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-18894 Filed 8-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: October 20, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 203)]
[CORRECTIONS]
[Page 62050]
[DOCID:fr20oc06-121]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-545771; File No. SR-ISE-2006-56]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change and Admendment No. 1
Relating to Customer Fees for Certain Complex Orders

Correction

    In notice document 06-8646 beginning on page 60593 in the issue of
Friday, October 13, 2006, make the following correction:
    On page 60593, in the first column, under the Agency heading, in
the Agency number, ``34-545771'' should read ``34-54571''.

[FR Doc. C6-8646 Filed 10-19-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14521-14522]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05373]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2008-0135]

Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    Under part 211 of title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this
document provides the public notice that on February 22, 2021, the Port
Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation (PATH) petitioned the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) for an extension of a waiver of
compliance from certain provisions of the Federal railroad safety
regulations contained at 49 CFR part 229, Railroad Locomotive Safety
Standards. FRA assigned the petition Docket Number FRA-2008-0135.
    Specifically, PATH requests continued relief from 49 CFR 229.123,
Pilots, snowplows, end plates, which requires lead locomotives to be
equipped with a pilot, snowplow, or end plate that extends across both
rails. PATH further requests that the relief be effective for the life
of the current PATH PA-5 fleet, noting that a waiver of this same
regulation covering the prior fleet of PATH cars, as well as the
current PA-5 fleet, has been in effect for over 31 years. PATH states
the installation of such a device to deflect foreign objects from the
running rail could possibly cause such an object to be deflected into
the power rail, potentially causing power outages or damage due to
electrical arcing. PATH also explains the addition of a pilot would
interfere with the transponder interrogator antennas that are currently
installed as part of the Communications Based Train Control system.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested parties
desire an opportunity for oral comment and a public hearing, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
     Website: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
    Communications received by April 30, 2021 will be considered by FRA
before final action is taken. Comments received after that date will be
considered if practicable.
    Anyone can search the electronic form of any written communications
and comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better
inform its processes. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including
any personal information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/
ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. See

also https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice for the privacy notice
of regulations.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
John Karl Alexy,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety, Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-05373 Filed 3-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23732-23733]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9532]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0369]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Regulations Under the Federal Import Milk Act

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on the reporting and
recordkeeping requirements of FDA's regulations implementing the
Federal Import Milk Act (FIMA).

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by June 19, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Domini Bean, Office of Information
Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400T,
Rockville, MD 20850,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

Regulations Under the Federal Import Milk Act--21 CFR Part 1210 (OMB
Control Number 0910-0212)--Extension

    Under FIMA (21 U.S.C. 141-149), milk or cream may be imported into
the United States only by the holder of a valid import milk permit (21
U.S.C. 141). Before such permit is issued: (1) All cows from which
import milk or cream is produced must be physically examined and found
healthy; (2) if the milk or cream is imported raw, all such cows must
pass a tuberculin test; (3) the dairy farm and each plant in which the
milk or cream is processed or handled must be inspected and found to
meet certain sanitary requirements; (4) bacterial counts of the milk at
the time of importation must not exceed specified limits; and (5) the
temperature of the milk or cream at time of importation must not exceed
50[deg] F (21 U.S.C. 142).
    FDA's regulations in part 1210 (21 CFR part 1210) implement the
provisions of FIMA. Sections 1210.11 and 1210.14 require reports on the
sanitary conditions of, respectively, dairy farms and plants producing
milk and/or cream to be shipped to the United States. Section 1210.12
requires

reports on the physical examination of herds, while Sec.  1210.13
requires the reporting of tuberculin testing of the herds. In addition,
the regulations in part 1210 require that dairy farmers and plants
maintain pasteurization records (Sec.  1210.15) and that each container
of milk or cream imported into the United States bear a tag with the
product type, permit number, and shipper's name and address (Sec.
1210.22). Section 1210.20 requires that an application for a permit to
ship or transport milk or cream into the United States be made by the
actual shipper. Section 1210.23 allows permits to be granted based on
certificates from accredited officials.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                                     Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of
              21 CFR Section                         Form No.              Number of     responses per   Total annual    Average burden    Total hours
                                                                          respondents     respondent       responses      per response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1210.11..................................  FDA 1996/Sanitary                         2             200             400              1.5            600
                                            inspection of dairy farms.
1210.12..................................  FDA 1995/Physical                         1               1               1              0.5              0.5
                                            examination of cows.
1210.13..................................  FDA 1994/Tuberculin test...               1               1               1              0.5              0.5
1210.14..................................  FDA 1997/Sanitary                         2               1               2              2                4
                                            inspections of plants.
1210.20..................................  FDA 1993/Application for                  2               1               2              0.5              1
                                            permit.
1210.23..................................  FDA 1815/Permits granted on               2               1               2              0.5              1
                                            certificates.
                                                                       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total................................  ...........................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ...............            607
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

                                                   Table 2--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Number of       Number of records     Total annual     Average burden per
                   21 CFR Section                        recordkeepers     per recordkeeper         records          recordkeeping        Total hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1210.15.............................................                  2                   1                   2                0.05                0.10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    The estimated number of respondents and hours per response are
based on FDA's experience with the import milk permit program and the
average number of import milk permit holders over the past 3 years. FDA
estimates that two respondents will submit approximately 200 Form FDA
1996 reports annually, for a total of 600 responses. FDA estimates the
reporting burden to be 1.5 hours per response, for a total burden of
607 hours.
    The Secretary of Health and Human Services has the discretion to
allow Form FDA 1815, a duly certified statement signed by an accredited
official of a foreign government, to be submitted in lieu of Forms FDA
1994 and 1995. To date, Form FDA 1815 has been submitted in lieu of
these forms. Because FDA has not received any Forms FDA 1994 and 1995
in the last 3 years, the Agency estimates no more than one will be
submitted annually. FDA estimates the reporting burden for each to be
0.5 hours per response for a total burden reporting burden of 0.5 hours
each.
    FDA estimates that two respondents will submit one Form FDA 1997
report annually, for a total of two responses. FDA estimates the
reporting burden to be 2.0 hours per response, for a total burden of 4
hours. FDA estimates that two respondents will submit one Form FDA 1993
report annually, for a total of two responses. FDA estimates the
reporting burden to be 0.5 hours per response, for a total burden of 1
hour. FDA estimates that two respondents will submit one Form FDA 1815
report annually, for a total of two responses. FDA estimates the
reporting burden to be 0.5 hours per response, for a total burden of 1
hour.
    With regard to records maintenance, FDA estimates that
approximately two recordkeepers will spend 0.05 hours annually
maintaining the additional pasteurization records required by Sec.
1210.15, for a total of 0.10 hours annually.
    No burden has been estimated for the tagging requirement in Sec.
1210.22 because the information on the tag is either supplied by FDA
(permit number) or is disclosed to third parties as a usual and
customary part of the shipper's normal business activities (type of
product, shipper's name and address). Under 5 CFR 1320.3(c)(2), the
public disclosure of information originally supplied by the Federal
Government to the recipient for the purpose of disclosure to the public
is not a collection of information. Under 5 CFR 1320.3(b)(2)), the
time, effort, and financial resources necessary to comply with a
collection of information are excluded from the burden estimate if the
reporting, recordkeeping, or disclosure activities needed to comply are
usual and customary because they would occur in the normal course of
business activities.

    Dated: April 16, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-9532 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 139 (Tuesday, July 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43078-43079]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17789]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP15-8-000]

Northwest Pipeline, LLC: Notice of Availability of the
Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Kalama Lateral Project

    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) for the
Kalama Lateral Project, proposed by Northwest Pipeline, LLC (Northwest)
in the above-referenced docket. Northwest requests authorization to
construct and operate about 3.1 miles of natural gas transmission
pipeline and associated facilities in Cowlitz County, Washington. The
Project would provide about 320 million cubic feet per day of natural
gas to the NW Innovation Works' (NWIW) proposed Kalama Manufacturing &
Marine Export Facility Methanol Plant, a methanol production facility
that would be located at the Port of Kalama, also in Cowlitz County.
    The EA assesses the potential environmental effects of the
construction and operation of the Kalama Lateral Project in accordance
with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
The FERC staff concludes that approval of

the proposed project, with appropriate mitigating measures, would not
constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality
of the human environment.
    There were not any agencies that participated as cooperating
agencies in the preparation of the EA.
    The proposed Kalama Lateral Project includes the following
facilities:
     About 3.1 miles of 24-inch-diameter natural gas pipeline;
     one meter station, the Kalama Delivery Lateral Meter
Station, within the boundaries of the Methanol Plant;
     one pig launcher at the proposed interconnect/tie-in
location with the existing Ignacio to Sumas 30-inch-diameter mainline
and one pig receiver at the proposed meter station site; and
     new appurtenances at the proposed tie-in location,
including a new tap, valve, and isolated flange.
    The FERC staff mailed copies of the EA to federal, state, and local
government representatives and agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest groups; Native American tribes;
potentially affected landowners and other interested individuals and
groups; newspapers and libraries in the project area; and parties to
this proceeding.
    In addition, the Kalama Lateral Project EA is available for public
viewing on the FERC's Web site (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link.
A limited number of copies of the EA are available for distribution and
public inspection at: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public
Reference Room, 888 First Street NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426
(202) 502-8371.
    Any person wishing to comment on the EA may do so. Your comments
should focus on the potential environmental effects, reasonable
alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental impacts.
The more specific your comments, the more useful they will be. To
ensure that the Commission has the opportunity to consider your
comments prior to making its decision on this project, it is important
that we receive your comments in Washington, DC on or before August 12,
2015.
    For your convenience, there are three methods you can use to file
your comments to the Commission. In all instances, please reference the
project docket number (CP15-8-000) with your submission. The Commission
encourages electronic filing of comments and has expert staff available
to assist you at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (1) You can file your comments electronically using the eComment
feature on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. This is an easy method for submitting brief,
text-only comments on a project;
    (2) You can also file your comments electronically using the
eFiling feature on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the
link to Documents and Filings. With eFiling, you can provide comments
in a variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your
submission. New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking
on ``eRegister.'' You must select the type of filing you are making. If
you are filing a comment on a particular project, please select
``Comment on a Filing''; or
    (3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the following address: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC
20426.
    Any person seeking to become a party to the proceeding must file a
motion to intervene pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedures (18 CFR 385.214).\1\ Only intervenors have the
right to seek rehearing of the Commission's decision. The Commission
grants affected landowners and others with environmental concerns
intervenor status upon showing good cause by stating that they have a
clear and direct interest in this proceeding which no other party can
adequately represent. Simply filing environmental comments will not
give you intervenor status, but you do not need intervenor status to
have your comments considered.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See the previous discussion on the methods for filing
comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. Click on the
eLibrary link, click on ``General Search,'' and enter the docket number
excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field (i.e., CP15-
8). Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link also provides access to the
texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders,
notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.

     Dated: July 13, 2015..
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-17789 Filed 7-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13191-13193]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4805]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0992; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-126-AD;
Amendment 39-16968; AD 2012-04-12]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B16 (CL-604 Variant) airplanes. This AD
was prompted by reports of the air-driven generator (ADG) failing to
provide power during operational/function checks due to wires in the
ADG power feeder cables being damaged. The damage was due to galvanic
corrosion and inadequate silver-plating. This AD requires replacing ADG
power feeder cables. We are issuing this AD to prevent galvanic
corrosion on ADG power feeder cables, which could result in damage to
the cable and consequently the cable may not be able to provide
emergency electrical power to the airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective April 10, 2012.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 10,
2012.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Assata Dessaline, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on September 23, 2011
(76 FR 59067). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for
the specified products. The MCAI states:

    Three (3) events have occurred where the Air-Driven Generator
(ADG) failed to provide power on CL-600-2B19 (CRJ) aeroplanes during
their regularly scheduled operational/functional checks. An
investigation revealed that in all cases, the silver-plated copper
wires within the ADG power feeder cables were damaged due to
galvanic corrosion. It was subsequently determined that the silver-
plating is inadequate for this application.
    In the event of damage to the power feeder cable wires, the ADG
may not be able to provide emergency electrical power to the
aeroplane.
    Although there have been no reported failures to date on any CL-
600-2B16 (604 Variant) aeroplanes, a sampling program carried out on
these aeroplanes showed signs of microscopic galvanic corrosion on
the ADG power feeder cable wires.
    This [Transport Canada] directive is issued to correct this
potentially unsafe condition by mandating the replacement of all ADG
power feeder cables * * * with an ADG power feeder cable that
contains tin-plated copper wires.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comment received.

Request To Revise Applicability

    Bombardier Aerospace (Bombardier) commented that the aircraft
applicability needs to be revised to remove two of the three model
designations (Model CL-601-3A and -3R) specified in the NPRM (76 FR
59067, September 23, 2011), because only airplanes of the Model CL-604
Variant are affected by the proposed actions of the NPRM.
    We agree to revise the applicability of this AD as requested. The
airplane serial numbers specified in Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA) Airworthiness Directive CF-2011-08, dated April 28, 2011 (cited
in the NPRM (76 FR 59067, September 23, 2011) as the Canadian mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)), and Bombardier Service
Bulletin 604-24-024, dated January 31, 2011 (cited as the appropriate
service information for accomplishing the actions proposed by the NPRM)
are all of the Model CL-604

Variant. We have changed the affected airplanes specified in the
applicability in the Summary and in paragraph (c) of this AD
accordingly.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data, including the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD with the change described previously. We determined that this change
will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the
scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect about 72 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take about 24 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $1,897
per product. Where the service information lists required parts costs
that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the
U.S. operators to be $283,464, or $3,937 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM (76 FR 59067, September 23,
2011), the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2012-04-12 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-16968. Docket No. FAA-
2011-0992; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-126-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective April 10,
2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B16 (CL -604
Variant) airplanes, certificated in any category, serial numbers
5301, 5302, 5305 through 5318 inclusive, 5320 through 5328
inclusive, 5331 through 5349 inclusive, 5351 through 5367 inclusive,
5369 through 5408 inclusive, 5410, 5412 through 5426 inclusive, 5428
through 5438 inclusive, 5440 through 5489 inclusive, 5491 through
5498 inclusive, 5500 through 5517 inclusive, 5519 through 5522
inclusive, and 5524 through 5665 inclusive.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24: Electrical
power.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of the air-driven generator
(ADG) failing to provide power during operational/function checks
due to wires in the ADG power feeder cables being damaged. The
damage was due to galvanic corrosion and inadequate silver-plating.
We are issuing this AD to prevent galvanic corrosion on ADG power
feeder cables, which could result in damage to the cable and
consequently the cable may not be able to provide emergency
electrical power to the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Actions

    Within 72 months after the effective date of this AD, replace
the ADG power feeder cable, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 604-24-024, dated
January 31, 2011.

(h) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 516-794-
5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(i) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA)
Airworthiness Directive CF-2011-08, dated April 28, 2011; and
Bombardier Service Bulletin 604-24-024, dated January 31, 2011; for
related information.

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) You must use the following service information to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference (IBR) under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 of the
following service information.
    (i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 604-24-024, dated January 31,
2011, approved for IBR April 10, 2012.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
of this material at an NARA facility, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to
http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 22, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-4805 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<META name="generator" content="PDFCreactiveX HTML Export">
<META name="creation-date" content="18/05/2008 03:10:06 ">
<TITLE></TITLE>


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 14, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40474-40475]
[FR Doc No: 2019-17373]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent of Waiver With Respect to Land; Indianapolis
International Airport, Indianapolis, Indiana

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is considering a proposal to change 8.712 acres of
airport land from aeronautical use to non-aeronautical use and to
authorize the sale of airport property located at Indianapolis
International Airport, Indianapolis, Indiana. The aforementioned land
is not needed for aeronautical use.
    The land consists of 6 original airport acquired parcels. The
parcels were acquired under grants 3-18-0038-032, 3-18-0038-067, 3-18-
0038-083, 3-18-0038-094, and 3-18-0038-098 and local funding.
    There are no impacts to the airport by allowing the Indianapolis
Airport Authority to dispose of the property. The land is not needed
for future aeronautical development.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 13, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review by appointment at the FAA
Chicago Airports District Office, Melanie Myers, Program Manager, 2300
East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois 60018. Telephone: (847) 294-
7525/Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER> and Eric Anderson, Director of Properties,
Indianapolis Airport Authority, 7800 Col. H. Weir Cook Memorial Drive,
Indianapolis, IN 46241 Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Written comments on the Sponsor's request must be delivered or
mailed to: Melanie Myers, Program Manager, Federal Aviation
Administration, Chicago Airports District Office, 2300 East Devon
Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois 60018. Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>/Fax:
(847) 294-7046.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melanie Myers, Program Manager,
Federal Aviation Administration, Chicago Airports District Office, 2300
East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois 60018. Telephone: (847) 294-
7525/Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with section 47107(h) of Title
49, United States Code, this notice is required to be published in the
Federal Register 30 days before modifying the land-use assurance that
requires the property to be used for an aeronautical purpose.
    The disposition of proceeds from the sale of the airport property
will be in accordance with FAA's Policy and Procedures Concerning the
Use of Airport Revenue, published in the Federal Register on February
16, 1999 (64 FR 7696).
    This notice announces that the FAA is considering the release of
the subject airport property at the Indianapolis International Airport,
Indianapolis, Indiana from federal land covenants, subject to a
reservation for continuing right of flight as well as restrictions on
the released property as required in FAA Order 5190.6B section 22.16.
Approval does not constitute a commitment by the FAA to financially
assist in the disposal of the subject airport property nor a
determination of eligibility for grant-in-aid funding from the FAA.

Land Description

Instrument No. 1997-0055620

    A portion of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21,
Township 15 North, Range 2 East, in Marion County, Indiana, and said
portion being more particularly described as follows:
    Beginning at the intersection of the center line of the National
road with the East line of said Half-Quarter Section to a point 372
feet South of the Northeast corner of said Half-Quarter Section; and
running thence South with the East line of said Half-Quarter Section
574.2 feet to the North line of the Right-of-Way of the Vandalia
railroad; thence Southwesterly with the North line of said Right-of-way
320.3 feet; thence North 21 degrees West 515 feet to the center of the
National Road at a point 523 feet from the Beginning; and thence North
69 degrees East in the center of said National Road 523 feet to the
Place of Beginning.

Instrument No. 1997-0134267

    A part of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21,
Township 15 North, Range 2 East, Marion County, Indiana, being
described as follows:
    Commencing at an iron pin which marks the accepted Northwest corner
of the above captioned Northeast Quarter; thence North 88 degrees 40
minutes 08 seconds East (assumed bearing) with the North line of said
Northeast Quarter 1338.46 feet to the midpoint of the North line of the
Northeast Quarter, said point also being the Northwest corner of the
East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes
01 seconds West with the West line of the East Half of the Northeast
Quarter 387.78 feet to a PK nail on the centerline of Washington Street
(U.S. 40) and the point of beginning of the parcel herein described;
thence continuing South 00 degrees 00 minutes 01 seconds West 563.67
feet to an iron pin (Schneider Engr.) found in place on the North line
of the former Vandalia Railroad right-of-way, now the property of the
Indianapolis Airport Authority; thence with said North right-of-way
line North 72 degrees 43 minutes 49 seconds East 212.07 feet (formerly
described as 199.7 feet) to an iron pin on the West line of Lot No. 310
of A.V. Brown's Fourth Section of Western Heights Subdivision as
recorded in Plat Book 21, page 135; thence North 00 degrees 57 minutes
35 seconds West, with the West line of said Brown's subdivision, 297.65
feet to an iron pin; thence South 87 degrees 47 minutes 39 seconds West
111.77 feet to an iron pin; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 01
seconds East 41.98 feet to an iron pin; thence North 05 degrees 17
minutes 31 seconds West 192.68 feet to a PK nail on the center line of
Washington Street (U.S. 40); thence with said center line South 68
degrees 34 minutes 32 seconds West 73.13 feet to the point of
beginning.

Instrument No. 1997-0087189

    A part of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21,
Township 15 North, Range 2 East, Marion County, Indiana, being
described as follows:
    Commencing at an iron pin which marks the accepted Northwest corner
of the above captioned Northeast Quarter; thence North 88 degrees 40
minutes 08 seconds East (assumed bearing) with the North line of said
Northeast Quarter 1338.46 feet to the midpoint of the North line of the
Northeast Quarter said point also being the Northwest corner of the
East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence South no degrees no minutes
01 seconds West with the West lien of the East Half of the Northeast
Quarter 387.78 feet to a PK nail on the center line of Washington
Street (U.S. 40); thence with said center line North 68 degrees 34
minutes 32 seconds East 73.13 feet to a PK nail and the Point of
Beginning of the parcel herein described; thence South 05 degrees 17
minutes 31 seconds East 192.68 feet to an iron pin; thence South no
degrees no minutes 01 seconds West 41.98 feet to an iron pin on the
West line of Lot No. 310 of A.V. Brown's Fourth Section of Western
Heights Subdivision as recorded in Plat 21, Page 135; thence North no
degrees 57 minutes 35 seconds West 278.54 feet to a PK nail on the
center line of Washington Street (U.S. 40); thence with said center
line South 68 degrees 34 minutes 32 seconds West 134.06 feet to the
Point of Beginning.

Instrument No. 920156761

    Lot number Three Hundred Ten (310) in Arthur V. Brown's Fourth
Section Western Heights, an Addition to the City of Indianapolis, the
plat of which is recorded in Plat Book 21, page 135, in the Office of
the Recorder of Marion County, Indiana except a strip of ground of the
uniform width of Fifteen and Seven-tenths (15.7) feet taken by parallel
lines off of the entire South side thereof.

Instrument No. 2005-0162883

    Lot Number 309 in Arthur V. Brown's Fourth Section Western Heights,
an addition to the City of Indianapolis, the plat of which is recorded
in Plat Book 21, Page 135, in the office of the Recorder of Marion
County, Indiana, except the part conveyed to the Pittsburgh,
Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad Company in Land Record 82,
Page 197.
    Excepting therefrom that part of the described real estate conveyed
to the State of Indiana by deed dated February 15, 2000 and recorded in
Volume 2000-00067326.

    Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois on July 31, 2019.
Jose DeLeon,
Acting Manager, Chicago Airports District Office, FAA, Great Lakes
Region.
[FR Doc. 2019-17373 Filed 8-13-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


From:	Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To:	"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Cc:	Bridgid Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, Dominic J."
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Joseph-J Dougherty/DC/USEPA/US@EPA,
Marta Montoro/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott Jenkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia
Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date:	01/22/2010 10:38 PM

Subject:	RE: Updated version of the NO2 final notice

That's an interesting point.  I wonder if it should be significant for
the novel legal/policy issues, because you're right, it's not
significant economically.  What advice do you have?

From:	"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
To:	Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, Dominic J."
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Cc:	Bridgid Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Marta Montoro/DC/USEPA/US@EPA,
Joseph-J Dougherty/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott Jenkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA,
Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date:	01/22/2010 10:36 PM

Subject:	RE: Updated version of the NO2 final notice

Lydia, does EPA want to retain "economically significant" designation in

Section VIII?  As strange as it seems to say this about a NAAQS, I don't

believe this rule meets the definition.

h

-----Original Message-----

From<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:33 PM

To: King, Heidi R.; Mancini, Dominic J.

Cc<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Subject: Fw: Updated version of the NO2 final notice

Here's the track changes version.

(See attached file: NO2 primary NAAQS-final (1-22-2010 track

changes).doc.docx)


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 166 (Friday, August 26, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 53444]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21803]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13988-000]

Northland Power Mississippi River LLC; Notice of Preliminary
Permit Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions
To Intervene, and Competing Applications

    On January 3, 2011, Northland Power Mississippi River LLC filed an
application, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act,
proposing to study the feasibility of hydropower on the Mississippi
River, near the town of North Vacherie, in St. James Parish, Louisiana.
The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant the
permit holder priority to file a license application during the permit
term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder to
perform any land-disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands or
waters owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed NPI 020 hydrokinetic project would consist of the
following: (1) Up to 240 TREK generating units installed in a matrix on
the bottom of the river; (2) the total capacity of the installation
would be up to 60,000 kilowatts; (3) shielded underwater cables would
convey each matrix power to a substation; and (4) a transmission line
would interconnect with the power grid. The proposed project would have
an average annual generation of 526 gigawatt-hours (GWh), which would
be sold to a local utility.
    Applicant Contact: Tim Richardson, 30 St. Clair Avenue West, 17th
Floor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; phone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Michael Spencer,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and
competing applications may be filed electronically via the Internet.
See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's
Web site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>call toll-free at (866) 208-
3676; or, for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission
strongly encourages electronic filing, documents may also be paper-
filed. To paper-file, mail an original and seven copies to: Kimberly D.
Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-13988-000) in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: August 18, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-21803 Filed 8-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


8
.
5
101,106
10.
3
103
,699
1
0
.3
New Jersey
38
4,947
6.
2
4
0
2
,339
6.
2
496
,395
7
.
8
4
6
0
,222
7.
1
563,149
8
.
6
491
,709
7
.
5
New Mexico
85,785
6
.
9
90
,543
6.
9
104
,145
7
.
8
91,757
6
.
7
127,614
9
.
3
128
,062
8
.
9
New York
1,058,759
7
.
7
1,059,051
7.
3
1
,130,548
7
.
9
1
,106,254
7
.
6
1,292,115
8
.
9
1,367,913
9
.
3
North Carolina
41
7,570
7.
1
3
9
7
,774
6.
4
402
,207
6
.
5
4
5
1
,015
7.
1
481,011
7
.
5
425
,243
6
.
5
North Dakota
34,316
7
.
4
32
,143
6.
8
3
4,874
7
.
3
33,510
7
.
0
3
7
,378
7
.
7
3
6
,512
7
.
3
Ohio
71
9,001
8.
6
6
1
5
,294
7.
2
621
,936
7
.
3
6
0
8
,796
7.
1
726,742
8
.
5
696
,394
8
.
0
Oklahoma
15
8,064
6.
3
1
7
8
,660
6.
9
182
,254
7
.
1
1
9
8
,626
7.
6
217,629
8
.
3
229
,037
8
.
5
Oregon
21
1,366
8.
5
2
0
9
,380
8.
1
229
,049
8
.
7
2
4
9
,204
9.
3
260,500
9
.
7
281
,902
1
0
.1
Pennsylvania
5
9
9
,423
6.
5
6
9
1
,529
7.
3
741
,664
7
.
9
7
8
5
,143
8.
3
837,444
8
.
8
778
,643
8
.
1
Rhode Island
64,420
8
.
5
75
,642
9.
3
7
2,311
8
.
9
78,694
9
.
6
8
1
,218
9
.
6
8
8
,899
1
0
.7
South Carolina
19
6,081
6.
8
1
9
5
,558
6.
5
178
,930
5
.
8
1
9
1
,055
6.
1
242,164
7
.
6
213
,040
6
.
6
South Dakota
29,384
5
.
6
28
,954
5.
3
3
2,804
5
.
9
41,290
7
.
3
3
7
,769
6
.
7
4
2
,899
7
.
3
Tennessee
3
0
3
,235
7.
3
2
9
7
,976
6.
8
356
,379
8
.
2
3
5
0
,559
7.
9
400,139
9
.
0
352
,078
7
.
7
Texas
9
4
9
,490
6.
5
9
3
2
,057
6.
1
1
,104,526
7
.
1
1
,093,265
6
.
9
1,147,991
7
.
1
1,124,290
6
.
8
Utah
10
6,714
7.
6
1
0
3
,383
7.
0
124
,327
8
.
0
1
1
7
,491
7.
4
131,414
8
.
0
138
,162
8
.
0
Vermont
31,945
7
.
2
40
,448
8.
8
4
0,343
8
.
6
39,683
8
.
4
4
0
,767
8
.
5
4
8
,062
9
.
8
Virginia
36
8,099
7.
1
3
4
8
,225
6.
4
392
,023
7
.
2
4
2
2
,958
7.
6
412,370
7
.
3
499
,632
8
.
7
Washington
35
2,103
8.
2
3
3
7
,123
7.
6
396
,172
8
.
9
4
1
2
,896
9.
1
423,408
9
.
2
441
,912
9
.
2
West Virginia
11
7,033
8.
5
1
2
8
,863
9.
3
126
,906
9
.
1
1
1
4
,053
8.
1
143,407