	PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION

Please read the instructions before completing this form.  For
additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your
agency(s Paperwork Clearance Officer.  Send two copies of this form, the
collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any
additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102,
725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1.  Agency/Subagency originating request

USEPA/Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance

2.  OMB control number                 b. ( None

a   2060 - 0067

3.  Type of information collection (check one)

     a. ( New collection

     b. ( Revision of a currently approved collection

     c. X  Extension of a currently approved collection

     d. ( Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved

              collection for which approval has expired

     e. ( Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved

              collection for which approval has expired

     f. ( Existing collection in use without an OMB control number

4. Type of review requested (check one)

    a. X  Regular

    b. ( Emergency - Approval requested by:          /       /

    c. ( Delegated

5.  Small entities

     Will this information collection have a significant economic

      impact on a substantial number of small entities?    ( Yes    X
No

    For b-f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions

6.  Requested expiration date

   a. X Three years from approval date   b. ( Other Specify:      /
/___

7.  Title

 NSPS for Equipment Leaks of VOC in Petroleum Refineries (40 CFR part
60, subpart GGG) (Renewal)

8. Agency form number(s) (If applicable)

EPA ICR Number 0983.08

9. Keywords

 NSPS, petroleum refinery, equipment leaks, VOCs

10. Abstract

This rule applies to process units in volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
service at petroleum refineries.  Owners and operators would comply with
the monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements of the NSPS
General Provisions (40 CFR part 60, subpart A) and any specific
requirements cited in this rule, including equipment leaks monitoring,
to determine if compliance has been achieved.

11.  Affected public (Mark primary with (P( and all others that apply
with (X()

a.     Individuals or households   d.      Farms

b. P Business or other for-profit e.      Federal Government

c.     Not-for-profit institutions    f.      State, Local or Tribal
Government

12. Obligation to respond (Mark primary with (P( and all others that
apply with (X()

        a.  ( Voluntary

        b.  ( Required to obtain or retain benefits

        c.  P  Mandatory

13.  Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden

       a. Number of respondents                                    148
                               b. Total annual responses
                   296

            1. Percentage of these responses

                     collected electronically
10  %

       c.  Total hours requested                                21,360
                                d.  Current OMB inventory
              6,137                                  e.  Difference
                                            15,223

       f.  Explanation of difference

            1.  Program Change
 0                                       2.  Adjustment
                          15,233

14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden (in thousands of
dollars)

       a.  Total annualized capital/startup costs                      0

        b. Total annual costs (O&M)
 0

        c. Total annualized cost requested
0

        d. Current OMB inventory
 0

        e. Difference
            0

        f. Explanation of difference

            1.  Program change
       0

            2.  Adjustment
          0

15. Purpose of  information collection (Mark Primary With (P( and all
others that apply with (X()

  a. __Application for benefits      e. __Program planning or management

  b. __Program evaluation            f. __Research

  c. __General purpose statistics  g. P Regulatory  or  compliance

  d. __Audit

16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting (check all that apply)

      a. X Recordkeeping                        b. ( Third party
disclosure

      c. X Reporting

              1. X On occasion        2. ( Weekly                   3. (
Monthly

              4. ( Quarterly             5.  X  Semi-annually      6. (
Annually

              7. ( Biannually           8. X ( Other (describe):
Initially

17.  Statistical methods

       Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

                                                        ( Yes       X
No

18.  Agency contact (person who can best answer questions regarding the
content of this submission)

        Name:          Maria Malave

        Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>

OMB 83-I

10/95

19.  Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of
information encompassed by this request complies with'

5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: 	The text of  5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3), appear at the end of the instructions.  The certification
is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth
 in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed
collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a)  It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b)  It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c)  It reduces burden on small entities;

(d)  It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is
understandable to respondents;

(e)  Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current
reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f)  It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g)  It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3):

  	(i)  Why the information is being collected(

(ii)  Use of information;

(iii)  Burden estimate;

(iv)  Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or
mandatory);

(v)   Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi)  Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h)  It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated
resources for the efficient and effective management

                          and use of the information to be collected
(see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

(i)  It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and

(j)  It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions,
identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the
Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Official
        Michael S. Alushin, Director

                                                      Compliance
Assessment and Media Programs Division

Office of Compliance

 Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance

Date

Signature of Senior Official or designee	  Oscar Morales, Director

Collection Strategies  Division

Office of Environmental Information

Date

OMB 83-I 	10/95

	Certification Requirement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions

 tc \l2 "	Certification Requirement for Paperwork Reduction Act
Submissions

5 CFR 1320.9 reads (As part of the agency submission to OMB of a
proposed collection of information, the agency (through the head of the
agency, the Senior Official or their designee) shall certify (and
provide a record supporting such certification) that the proposed
collection of information --

     ((a) is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including that the information to be collected will have
practical utility;

     ((b) is not unnecessarily duplicative of information otherwise
reasonably accessible to the agency;

     ((c) reduces to the extent practicable and appropriate the burden
on persons who shall provide information to or for the agency, including
with respect to small entities, as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act 5 U.S.C. ( 601(6)), the use of such techniques as:

((1) establishing differing compliance or reporting requirements or
timetables that take into account the resources available to those who
are to respond;

((2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance
and reporting requirements; or collection of information , or any part
thereof;

((3) an exemption from coverage of the collection of information, or any
part thereof;

     ((d) is written using plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology
and is understandable to those who are to respond;

     ((e) is to be implemented in ways consistent and compatible, to the
maximum extent practicable, with the existing reporting and
recordkeeping practices of those who are to respond;

      ((f) indicates for each recordkeeping requirement the length of
time persons are required to maintain the records specified;

      ((g) informs potential respondents of the information called for
under ( 1320.8(b)(3); [see below]

      ((h) has been developed by an office that has planned and
allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use
of the information to be collected, including the processing of the
information in a manner which shall enhance, where appropriate, the
utility of the information to agencies and the public;

      ((i) uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology
appropriate to the purpose for which the information is to be collected;
and

      ((j) to the maximum extent practicable, uses appropriate
information technology to reduce burden and improve data quality, agency
efficiency and responsiveness to the public.(

NOTE: 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3) requires that each collection of information:

     ((3) informs and provides reasonable notice to the potential
persons to whom the collection of information is addressed of:

((i) the reasons the information is planned to be and/or has been used
to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency;

((ii) the way such information is planned to be and/or has been used to
further the proper performance of the functions of the agency;

((iii) an estimate, to the extent practicable, of the average burden of
the collection (together with a request that the public direct to the
agency any comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and
any suggestions for reducing this burden);

((iv) whether responses to the collection of information are voluntary,
required to obtain or retain a benefit (citing authority), or mandatory
(citing authority);

((v) the nature and extent of confidentiality to be provided, if any
(citing authority); and

((vi) the fact that any agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.(

OMB 83-I (Instructions)

                                                10/95


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55893-55894]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22330]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

[Docket No. DOT-OST-2004-16951]

Agency Requests for Renewal of a Previously Approved Information
Collection: Exemptions for Air Taxi Operations

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation (DOT) invites public comments
about our intention to request the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)'s approval to renew an information collection. The collection
involves a classification of air carriers known as air taxi operators
and their filings of a one-page form that enables them to obtain
economic authority from DOT. The information to be collected is
necessary for DOT to determine whether an air taxi operator meets DOT's
criteria for an economic authorization in accordance with DOT rules. We
are required to publish this notice in the Federal Register by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by November 13, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by Docket No. DOT-OST-
2004-16951] through one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
     Mail or Hand Delivery: Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except on Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanessa R. Balgobin,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
Office of Aviation Analysis, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, 20590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2105-0565.
    Title: Exemptions for Air Taxi Operations.
    Form Numbers: OST Form 4507.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: Part 298 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Exemptions for Air Taxi Registration, establishes a
classification of air carriers known as air taxi operators that offer
on-demand passenger service. The regulation exempts these small

operators from certain provisions of the Federal statute to permit them
to obtain economic authority by filing a one-page, front and back, OST
Form 4507, Air Taxi Operator Registration, and Amendments under Part
298 of DOT's Regulations.
    DOT expects to receive 200 new air taxi registrations and 2,200
amended air taxi registrations each year, resulting in 2,400 total
respondents. Further, DOT expects filers of new registrations to take 1
hour to complete the form, while it should only take 30 minutes to
prepare amendments to the form. Thus, the total annual burden is
expected to be 1,300 hours.
    Respondents: U.S. air taxi operators.
    Number of Respondents: 2,400.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Number of Responses: 2,400.
    Total Annual Burden: 1,300 hours.

Public Comments Invited

    You are asked to comment on any aspect of this information
collection, including (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for [your office]'s performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for [your office] to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1:48.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 5, 2012.
Lauralyn J. Remo,
Chief, Air Carrier Fitness Division, Office of Aviation Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2012-22330 Filed 9-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


[Federal Register: September 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 178)]
[Notices]
[Page 56150-56152]
[DOCID:fr15se10-123]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-62867; File No. SR-Phlx-2010-122]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Clarify
What Information Must Be Entered Into the Exchange's Options Floor
Broker Management System

September 8, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that on September 2, 2010, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing with the Commission a proposal to amend Phlx
Rule 1063 (Responsibilities of Floor Brokers) and Phlx Options
Procedure Advice C-2 (Options Floor Broker Management System) \3\ to
clarify what information must be entered into the Exchange's Options
Floor Broker Management System.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Options Floor Procedure Advices (``OFPAs'' or ``Advices'')
generally correspond to Exchange rules. OFPA C-2 is a corresponding
Advice to Rule 1063, which deals, in part, with the Options Floor
Broker Management System and is part of the Exchange's minor rule
plan (``MRP'' or ``Minor Rule Plan''). The Exchange's Minor Rule
Plan consists of Advices with preset fines, pursuant to Rule 19d-
1(c) under the Act. 17 CFR 240.19d-1(c). See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 50997 (January 7, 2005), 70 FR 2444 (January 13, 2005)
(SR-Phlx-2003-40) (approval order establishing Floor Broker
Management System in OFPA C-2 and Rule 1063).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://nasdaqomxphlx .cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQOMXPHLX/
Filings/, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this proposal is to amend Phlx Rule 1063 and Options
Floor Procedure Advice C-2 to clarify that information entered into the
Exchange's Options Floor Broker Management System must include order
receipt time.
    The Exchange's Options Floor Broker Management System (``FBMS'')
\4\ was designed to establish an electronic audit trail for equity,
equity index and U.S. dollar-settled foreign currency options \5\
orders represented by Floor Brokers \6\ on the Exchange.\7\ The Options
Floor Broker Management System is found in Rule 1063(e) and
corresponding Advice C-2 and states that either a Floor Broker or an
employee of a Floor Broker has to record all options orders represented
by such Floor Broker onto the electronic FBMS (as described in Rule
1080,

Commentary .06) contemporaneously upon receipt of an order and prior to
the representation of such an order in the trading crowd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Rule 1080, Commentary .06 states, in relevant part: The
Options Floor Broker Management System is a component of AUTOM
designed to enable Floor Brokers and/or their employees to enter,
route and report transactions stemming from options orders received
on the Exchange. The Options Floor Broker Management System also is
designed to establish an electronic audit trail for options orders
represented and executed by Floor Brokers on the Exchange, such that
the audit trial provides an accurate, time-sequenced record of
electronic and other orders, quotations and transactions on the
Exchange, beginning with the receipt of an order by the Exchange,
and further documenting the life of the order through the process of
execution, partial execution, or cancellation of that order. Rule
1080(a) states, in relevant part: AUTOM is the Exchange's electronic
order delivery and reporting system, which provides for the
automatic entry and routing of Exchange-listed equity options, index
options and U.S. dollar-settled foreign currency options orders to
the Exchange trading floor.
    \5\ U.S. dollar-settled foreign currency options traded on the
Exchange are also known as World Currency Options (``WCO'') or
Foreign Currency Options (``FCO'').
    \6\ Floor Broker is defined in Rule 1060 as: An individual who
is registered with the Exchange for the purpose, while on the
Options Floor, of accepting and executing options orders received
from members and member organizations.
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50997 (January 7,
2005), 70 FR 2444 (January 13, 2005) (SR-Phlx-2003-40) (approval
order establishing FBMS in Rule 1063 and OFPA C-2, and adding
definition of FBMS in Commentary .06 to Rule 1080).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 1063(e) and OFPA C-2 specify what information must be entered
into FBMS (the ``FBMS information''). The FBMS information currently
required to be entered includes, among other things, the options symbol
and the order type (i.e., customer, firm, broker-dealer, professional),
but not the order receipt time. Rule 1063(f), as well the second
paragraph of corresponding OFPA C-2, states that Floor Brokers or their
employees shall enter FBMS information for FLEX \8\ options into the
Exchange's electronic audit trail in the same electronic format as the
required by Rule 1063(e) and OFPA C-2 for equity, equity index and U.S.
dollar-settled foreign currency options. In that per OFPA C-2 the
Options Floor Broker Management System is part of the Exchange's Minor
Rule Plan,\9\ the Advice sets forth a fine schedule for failure to
enter FBMS information.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ FLEX options are flexible exchange-traded index, equity, or
currency option contracts that provide investors the ability to
customize basic option features including size, expiration date,
exercise style, and certain exercise prices. FLEX options may have
expiration dates within five years. See Rule 1079. FLEX currency
option contracts traded on the Exchange are also known as FLEX WCO
or FLEX FCO contracts.
    \9\ See supra note 3.
    \10\ The OFPA C-2 fine schedule is as follows:
    FINE SCHEDULE (Implemented on a two-year calendar basis): 1st
Occurrence--$500.00; 2nd Occurrence--$1,000.00;--3rd Occurrence--
$2,000.00; 4th Occurrence and Thereafter--Sanction is discretionary
with the Business Conduct Committee.
    The Exchange does not propose any changes in this filing to the
Fine Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that the time that an order is entered is being
captured by the system in the audit trail created via the FBMS per Rule
1063(e) and OFPA C-2, but is not specifically required in the rule and
Advice as currently written. The Exchange is therefore proposing to
change Rule 1063 and OFPA C-2 to require entry of order receipt time
information into the FBMS, thereby making this information requirement
a part of the Minor Rule Plan reflected in OFPA C-2 and conforming the
Advice and the rule.
    Specifically, the Exchange proposes to state in Rule 1063(e)(i) and
OFPA C-2 that Floor Brokers or their employees must record order
receipt time in conjunction with order type in FBMS. Proposed Rule
1063(e)(i) and OFPA C-2 as amended will each state, in relevant part:
The following specific information with respect to orders represented
by a Floor Broker shall be recorded by such Floor Broker or such Floor
Broker's employees: (i) The order type (i.e., customer, firm, broker-
dealer, professional) and order receipt time; (ii) the option symbol;
(iii) buy, sell, cross or cancel; \11\ (iv) call, put, complex (i.e.,
spread, straddle), or contingency order as described in Rule 1066; (v)
number of contracts; (vi) limit price or market order or, in the case
of a complex order, net debit or credit, if applicable; (vii) whether
the transaction is to open or close a position; and (viii) The Options
Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') clearing number of the broker-dealer
that submitted the order (collectively, the ``required
information'').\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ To ensure conformity of Rule 1063 and Advice C-2, which
both contain the list of specific information, the exchange proposes
to insert the word ``cross'' into Advice C-2.
    \12\ The Exchange notes also that Rule 17a-3(a)(7) pursuant to
the Act states, in relevant part, that broker-dealers that transact
a business in securities through members of a national securities
exchange shall make and keep current the books and records relating
to its business including, but not limited to, among other things: A
memorandum of each purchase and sale for the account of the member,
broker, or dealer showing the price and, to the extent feasible, the
time of execution; and, in addition, where the purchase or sale is
with a customer other than a broker or dealer, a memorandum of each
order received, showing the time of receipt. 17 CFR 240.17a-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposal would codify current
practice, ensure that violations of FBMS in terms of failure to enter
order receipt time are part of the Exchange's Minor Rule Plan, and
harmonize Rule 1063(e) and OFPA C-2.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ The Exchange has filed a proposal to make unrelated changes
to Rule 1063 and OFPA C-2 at SR-Phlx-2010-116 that we believe do not
impact the changes proposed herein. We would update this rule change
proposal should it become necessary in light of SR-Phlx-2010-116.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \14\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \15\ in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of
a free and open market and a national market system. In particular, the
Exchange proposes to codify current practice, ensure that violations of
the Options Floor Broker Management System in terms of failure to enter
order receipt time are part of the Exchange's Minor Rule Plan, and
harmonize Rule 1063(e) and OFPA C-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (1)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) impose any significant burden on competition; and (3)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \16\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Phlx has given the
Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule
change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date on which the
Exchange filed the proposed rule change. See 17 CFR 240.19b-
4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2010-122 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary,

Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2010-122. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission,\18\ all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
Phlx-2010-122 and should be submitted on or before October 6, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ The text of the proposed rule change is available on
Exchange's Web site at http://nasdaqtrader.com/
micro.aspx?id=PHLXfilings, on the Commission's Web site at http://
www.sec.gov, at Phlx, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-22945 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 183 (Friday, September 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44406-44408]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20331]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0242; EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0226; FRL-9965-80]

Pesticides; Final Guidance for Pesticide Registrants on Two
Pesticide Registration Notices Related to Resistance Management

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is announcing the
availability of two final Pesticide Registration Notices (PRNs)
entitled, ``Guidance for Pesticide Registrants on Pesticide Resistance
Management Labeling'' and ``Guidance for Herbicide Resistance
Management Labeling, Education, Training, and Stewardship.'' The Agency
signed these final PRNs, identified as 2017-1 and 2017-2 respectively,
on August 24, 2017. PRNs are issued by the Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) to inform pesticide registrants and other interested persons
about important policies, procedures, and registration-related
decisions, and to provide guidance to pesticide registrants and OPP
personnel. PRN 2017-1, which updates PRN 2001-5, provides guidance for
registrants to follow when developing resistance management information
to include on their pesticide labels. PRN 2017-2 communicates the
Agency's current thinking and approach to address herbicide-resistant
weeds by providing guidance on labeling, education, training, and
stewardship for herbicides undergoing registration review or
registration (i.e., new herbicide active ingredients, new uses proposed
for use on herbicide-resistant crops, or other case-specific
registration actions). The Agency requested comment on both of

PRNs on June 3, 2016 (81 FR 35766 and 81 FR 35767). Today's final PRNs
reflect consideration of public comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions or information related
to PRN 2017-1, contact Nikhil Mallampalli, Biological and Economic
Analysis Division (7503P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For questions or information related to PRN 2017-2, contact Bill
Chism, Biological and Economic and Analysis Division (7503P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. Although this
action may be of particular interest to those persons who submit data
under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
or are required to register pesticides. Since other entities may also
be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the
specific entities that may be affected by this action.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    The dockets for PRN 2017-1 and PRN 2017-2, identified by docket
identification (ID) numbers EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0242 and EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-
0226, respectively, are available either electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the OPP Docket in the
Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the OPP Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional information about the docket
available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. What guidance do these PRNs provide?

A. PRN 2017-1

    PRN 2017-1 (entitled ``Guidance for Pesticide Registrants on
Pesticide Resistance Management Labeling'') is aimed at improving
information on pesticide labels to help pesticide users minimize and
manage pest resistance. PRN 2017-1 updates PRN 2001-5 with the
following categories of changes: (a) Provides additional guidance to
registrants, and a recommended format for resistance-management
statements or information to place on labels; (b) includes references
to external technical resources for guidance on resistance management;
and (c) updates the instructions on how to submit changes to existing
labels in order to enhance resistance-management language. PRN 2017-1
also discusses what pesticides are covered by the PRN.
    PRN 2017-1 addresses end-use herbicide, fungicide/bactericide, or
insecticide/acaricide products that are intended for agricultural and
certain non-cropland areas under commercial or government-sponsored
pest management. The recommendations in PRN 2017-1 are for both
products that are pending registration and currently registered
products. In particular, the PRN applies to all field use agricultural
pesticide products, as well as pesticides which are labeled for
greenhouse production, sod farms, ornamental crops, aquatic vegetation,
rights-of-way, and pest management along roadways. This guidance is not
intended to apply to products labeled for use by the general consumer,
such as residential use pesticides.

B. PRN 2017-2

    PRN 2017-2 (entitled ``Guidance for Herbicide Resistance Management
Labeling, Education, Training, and Stewardship'') communicates the
Agency's approach to address the development of herbicide-resistant
weeds by providing guidance on labeling, education, training, and
stewardship for herbicides undergoing registration review or
registration (i.e., new herbicide actives, new uses proposed for use on
herbicide-resistant crops, or other case-specific registration
actions). It is part of a holistic, proactive, multi-stakeholder
approach to slow the development and spread of herbicide-resistant
weeds, and prolong the useful lifespan of herbicides and related
technology. PRN 2017-2 articulates a combination of labeling and
educational activities that are intended to slow the progression of
development of resistant weeds.
    PRN 2017-2 applies to end-use herbicide products used in
agriculture, including commercial turf and sod farms, and ornamental
production that is in the open. It also applies to non-agricultural use
sites such as golf courses, aquatic vegetation, rights-of-way and
vegetation management along roadways. This PRN does not apply to
herbicide products labeled for use by the general consumer, such as
residential use pesticides. Technical and manufacturing use products
are expressly excluded.

III. What comments did EPA receive on these PRNs?

A. PRN 2017-1

    The Agency received 19 comment letters on the PRN 2017-1 from non-
governmental organizations (NGOs), grower groups, professional
scientific societies, registrants, resistance action committees (RACs),
and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). There was
general agreement among commenters that additional resistance
management information on labels would be useful, especially the
routine inclusion of a pesticide's mode of action group, which is
established by the various RACs. A few RACs disagreed with some of the
suggested label statements in the guidance, particularly for fungicides
and insecticides. Some commenters expressed concern and confusion about
whether non-agricultural pesticides are covered and whether all of the
guidance in the PRN is mandatory for registrants or pesticide users.
The Agency has considered the various comments in finalizing PRN 2017-1
and developed a response to comments document (Ref 1.), which can be
found under docket ID EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0242.

B. PRN 2017-2

    The Agency received 27 comment letters on the herbicide resistance
management PRN 2017-2 from NGOs, crop groups, professional societies,
registrants, RACs, and USDA. Most commenters generally agreed that
pesticide labels should provide additional resistance management
information. Several commenters proposed a single category of concern
for resistance to develop instead of the proposed three categories of
concern (low, moderate, and high) based on the potential for weeds to
develop herbicide resistance with increasing elements for resistance
management as the level of concern increased. Many commenters were
against having the registrants provide additional information to the
user/grower listing the weeds that are resistant to the herbicide(s) in
the product. Some commenters expressed concern on whether non-
agricultural pesticides are covered. The Agency has considered the
various comments in finalizing PRN 2017-2 and developed a

response to comments document (Ref. 2.), which can be found under
docket ID EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0226.

IV. Do PRNs contain binding requirements?

    The PRNs discussed in this notice are intended to provide guidance
to EPA personnel and pesticide registrants. While the requirements in
the statutes and Agency regulations are binding on EPA and the
applicants, these PRNs are not binding on either EPA or pesticide
registrants, and EPA may depart from these PRNs where circumstances
warrant and without prior notice. Likewise, pesticide registrants may
assert that the guidance in these PRNs is not appropriate generally or
not applicable to a specific pesticide or situation.

V. References

    The following is a listing of the documents that are specifically
referenced in this notice. The docket includes these documents and
other information considered by EPA, including documents that are
referenced within the documents that are included in the docket, even
if the referenced document is not physically located in the docket. For
assistance in locating these other documents, please consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

USEPA, 2017a. Response to Comments Received on PRN 2016-X: Draft
Guidance for Pesticide Registrants on Pesticide Resistance
Management Labeling.
USEPA, 2017b. Response to Comments Received on PRN 2016-XX: Draft
Guidance for Herbicide Resistance Management Labeling, Education,
Training, and Stewardship.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: August 28, 2017.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2017-20331 Filed 9-21-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: October 24, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 205)]
[Notices]
[Page 62255]
[DOCID:fr24oc06-43]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL06-105-000]

NorthWestern Corporation; Notice of Extension of Time

October 17, 2006.
    On October 10, 2006, PPL EnergyPlus, LLC and PPL Montana, LLC
(collectively ``the PPL Companies'') filed a motion for an extension of
time to file comments in response to the Commission's Notice of Filing
issued September 21, 2006, in the above-docketed proceeding. The motion
states that the PPL Companies require additional time in order to
access and review relevant data and also to allow PPL Companies to
participate in an upcoming meeting between NorthWestern Corporation
(NorthWestern) and the Open Season participants which will facilitate
the evaluation of NorthWestern's proposal in this docket.
    Upon consideration, notice is hereby given that an extension of
time for filing comments is granted to and including November 6, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-17787 Filed 10-23-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 123 (Monday, June 27, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37258-37261]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15364]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0036; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-230-AD;
Amendment 39-16729; AD 2011-13-06]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400 Series
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    Bombardier Aerospace has completed a system safety review of the
aeroplanes fuel system against fuel tank safety standards introduced
in Chapter 525 of the Airworthiness Manual through Notice of
Proposed Amendment (NPA) 2002-043 [which corresponds with the FAA's
Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) 88]. The identified non-
compliances were then assessed using Transport Canada Policy Letter
No. 525-001, to determine if mandatory corrective action is
required.
    The assessment showed that a number of modifications to the fuel
system are required to mitigate unsafe conditions that could result
in potential ignition source within the fuel system.

We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective August 1, 2011.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of August 1,
2011.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Delisio, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion and Services Branch, ANE-173, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on February 7, 2011 (76
FR 6584). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    Bombardier Aerospace has completed a system safety review of the
aeroplanes fuel system against fuel tank safety standards introduced
in chapter 525 of the Airworthiness Manual through Notice of
Proposed Amendment (NPA) 2002-043 [which corresponds with the FAA's
Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) 88]. The identified non-
compliances were then assessed using Transport Canada Policy Letter
No. 525-001, to determine if mandatory corrective action is
required.
    The assessment showed that a number of modifications to the fuel
system are required to mitigate unsafe conditions that could result
in potential ignition source within the fuel system.

The Bombardier modifications include:
     Modsum 4-126330, ``Fuel Tank System Design Left and Right
Side (SFAR 88) Retrofit.'' The retrofit includes replacing certain
fittings, couplings, o-rings, gaskets, fuel adapter, and other related
components with new, improved parts; applying Alodine 1132 to certain
areas of a wing rib and a wing spar; and replacing a certain doubler on
the front wing spar with a new, improved doubler.
     Modsum 4-126366, ``Fuel Tank System and Fuel Indication--
Wiring Identification, Segregation and Installation (High Level Sensor
and Fuel Quantity Indication)--Retrofit.'' The retrofit includes adding
new wiring with protective sleeving, reworking existing wiring,
labeling and separating the fuel quantity indicating (FQI) wiring and
high level sensor wiring from other wiring, enhancing the electro-
magnetic interference (EMI) shielding of the wiring connected to the
vent valve position switch, and installing additional provisions
(bulkhead brackets) for wiring clips in the center fuselage.
     Modsum 4-901425, ``Fuel Feed to APU--Replacement of
Couplings in Center Wing Left Side--SFAR 88.''
     Modsum 4-126370, ``Fuel Tank System--Enhance Protective
Covering for Electrical Cable Assembly,'' which includes reworking the
contact area on the rib at Yw-42.000 to ensure adequate electrical
bonding, installing spiral wrap on certain cable assemblies where
existing spiral wrap does not extend 4 inches past the tie mounts,
applying a dome seal on thread openings on a high level sensor, and
installing fuel grommets at certain locations.
     Modsum 4-113580, ``Fuel Indication--High Level Sensor--
Application of Sealant to Exposed End of Sensor Terminal Block Screws--
Special Inspection and Rectification,'' which includes doing a detailed
inspection of the high level sensor for correct sealant coverage (`dome
seal') on the terminal screws, and applying sealant if necessary.
    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in

general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a Note within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 67 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 526 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $37,696 per
product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that
are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the
U.S. operators to be $5,521,202, or $82,406 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2011-13-06 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-16729. Docket No. FAA-
2011-0036; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-230-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August
1, 2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400, -401,
and -402 airplanes, certificated in any category; with serial
numbers (S/N) 4003, 4004, 4006, and 4008 through 4205 inclusive.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    Bombardier Aerospace has completed a system safety review of the
aeroplanes fuel system against fuel tank safety standards introduced
in Chapter 525 of the Airworthiness Manual through Notice of
Proposed Amendment (NPA) 2002-043 [which corresponds with the FAA's
Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) 88]. The identified non-
compliances were then assessed using Transport Canada Policy Letter
No. 525-001, to determine if mandatory corrective action is
required.
    The assessment showed that a number of modifications to the fuel
system are required to mitigate unsafe conditions that could result
in potential ignition source within the fuel system.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Actions Applicable to Airplanes Having S/N 4003, 4004, 4006 & 4008
through 4118

    (g) For airplanes having S/Ns 4003, 4004, 4006, and 4008 through
4118 inclusive: Within 6,000 flight hours after the effective date
of this AD, incorporate the modifications required in paragraphs
(g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD, as applicable.
    (1) Incorporate Bombardier Modsum 4-126330, ``Fuel Tank System
Design Left and Right Side (SFAR 88) Retrofit,'' by doing all the
applicable actions in the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-57-09, Revision B, dated September 3, 2008.
    (2) Incorporate Bombardier Modsum 4-126366, ``Fuel Tank System
and Fuel Indication--Wiring Identification, Segregation and
Installation (High Level Sensor and Fuel Quantity Indication)--
Retrofit,'' by doing all the applicable actions in the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-28-04,
Revision B, dated October 21, 2009.
    (3) For airplanes on which Bombardier Modsum 4-302000,
``Standard Option--APU Installation,'' has been installed:
Incorporate Bombardier Modsum 4-901425, ``Fuel Feed to APU--
Replacement of Couplings in Center Wing Left Side--SFAR 88,'' by
doing all the applicable actions in the Accomplishment Instructions
of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-28-05, dated June 28, 2006.
    (h) For airplanes having S/Ns 4003, 4004, 4006, and 4008 through
4118 inclusive, do Bombardier Fuel System Limitation (FSL) Task
284000-417 (Functional Check of the Fuel Tank Components and
Plumbing Lines for Electrical Bonding) contained in Section 4-1,
Fuel System Limitations, of Part 2--Airworthiness Limitation Items,
Revision 5, dated April 21, 2010, of Bombardier Q400 Dash 8
Maintenance Requirements Manual, PSM 1-84-7, at the applicable times
specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of

this AD. Where the task specifies contacting Bombardier for
technical assistance, this AD requires repairs/rework actions in
accordance with a method approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, or Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA) (or its delegated agent).
    (1) Except as provided in paragraphs (h)(1)(i) and (h)(1)(ii) of
this AD, for airplanes that have incorporated either Bombardier
Modsum 4-126330 or 4-901425 prior to the effective date of this AD:
Do Bombardier Task 284000-417 in Section 4-1, Fuel System
Limitations, of Part 2--Airworthiness Limitation Items, Revision 5,
dated April 21, 2010, of Bombardier Q400 Dash 8 Maintenance
Requirements Manual, PSM 1-84-7, within 6,000 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD.
    (i) Airplanes on which Bombardier Task 284000-417 in Section 4-
1, Fuel System Limitations, of Part 2--Airworthiness Limitation
Items, Revision 5, dated April 21, 2010, of Bombardier Q400 Dash 8
Maintenance Requirements Manual, PSM 1-84-7, was successfully
completed after incorporation of Bombardier Modsum 4-126330 or 4-
901425 do not need to comply with the requirements of paragraph (h)
of this AD.
    (ii) Airplanes on which Bombardier Modsum 4-126330 or 4-901425
was incorporated during manufacturing of the airplane do not need to
comply with the requirements of paragraph (h) of this AD.
    (2) For airplanes on which neither Bombardier Modsum 4-126330
nor 4-901425 were incorporated before the effective date of this AD:
Do Bombardier Task 284000-417 in Section 4-1, Fuel System
Limitations, of Part 2--Airworthiness Limitation Items, Revision 5,
dated April 21, 2010, of Bombardier Q400 Dash 8 Maintenance
Requirements Manual, PSM 1-84-7, upon completion of the
incorporation of Bombardier Modsum 4-126330 and, if applicable,
Bombardier Modsum 4-901425.

Actions Applicable to Airplanes S/N 4003, 4004, 4006 & 4008 Through
4118 Inclusive, Manufactured Before September 21, 2005

    (i) For airplanes having S/N 4003, 4004, 4006, and 4008 through
4118 inclusive, on which the date of issuance of the original
Canadian standard airworthiness certificate or the date of issuance
of the original Canadian export certificate of airworthiness is
before September 21, 2005: Within 6,000 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, incorporate Bombardier Modsum 4-126370,
``Fuel Tank System--Enhance Protective Covering for Electrical Cable
Assembly,'' by doing all the applicable actions in the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-28-03,
Revision C, dated May 15, 2009.

Actions Applicable to Airplanes S/N 4003, 4004, 4006 & 4008 Through
4118 Inclusive, Manufactured on or After September 21, 2005

    (j) For airplanes having S/Ns 4003, 4004, 4006, and 4008 through
4118 inclusive, on which the date of issuance of the original
Canadian standard airworthiness certificate or the date of issuance
of the original Canadian export certificate of airworthiness is on
or after September 21, 2005: Within 12,000 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, incorporate Bombardier Modsum 4-126370,
``Fuel Tank System--Enhance Protective Covering for Electrical Cable
Assembly,'' by doing all the applicable actions in the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-28-03,
Revision C, dated May 15, 2009.

Actions Applicable to Airplanes S/N 4119 Through 4205 Inclusive

    (k) For airplanes having S/N 4119 through 4205 inclusive: Within
6,000 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, incorporate
Bombardier Modsum 4-113580, ``Fuel Indication--High Level Sensor--
Application of Sealant to Exposed End of Sensor Terminal Block
Screws--Special Inspection and Rectification,'' by doing all the
applicable actions in the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-28-07, dated August 1, 2008.

Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information

    (l) Incorporation of Bombardier Modsum 4-126330 prior to the
effective date of this AD according to the instructions contained in
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-57-09, Revision A, dated March 19,
2007, meets the requirements of paragraph (g)(1) of this AD.
    (m) Incorporation of Bombardier Modsum 4-126366 prior to the
effective date of this AD according to the instructions contained in
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-28-04, dated June 29, 2006; or
Revision A, dated November 15, 2006; meets the requirements of
paragraph (g)(2) of this AD.
    (n) Incorporation of Bombardier Modsum 4-126370 prior to the
effective date of this AD according to instructions contained in
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-28-03, Revision B, dated October 18,
2006, meets the requirements of paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1:  This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: The MCAI specifies to do Bombardier Task
284000-417 in Section 4-1, Fuel System Limitations, of Part 2--
Airworthiness Limitation Items, Revision 5, dated April 21, 2010, of
Bombardier Q400 Dash 8 Maintenance Requirements Manual, PSM 1-84-7,
but does not specify what to do if the functional check finds that
measured resistance exceeds the specified values. This AD requires
contacting the Manager, New York ACO, FAA, or TCCA (or its delegated
agent) for repair/rework instructions.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (o) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, ANE-
170, New York ACO, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational Safety,
FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

Related Information

    (p) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2010-31,
dated September 3, 2010; Bombardier Task 284000-417 in Section 4-1,
Fuel System Limitations, of Part 2--Airworthiness Limitation Items,
Revision 5, dated April 21, 2010, of Bombardier Q400 Dash 8
Maintenance Requirements Manual, PSM 1-84-7; and the Bombardier
service bulletins identified in Table 1 of this AD; for related
information.

                  Table 1--Relevant Service Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Bombardier service bulletin--       Revision--            Dated--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
84-28-03.......................  C.................  May 15, 2009.
84-28-04.......................  B.................  October 21, 2009.
84-28-05.......................  Original..........  June 28, 2006.
84-28-07.......................  Original..........  August 1, 2008.
84-57-09.......................  B.................  September 3, 2008.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (q) You must use Bombardier Task 284000-417 in Section 4-1, Fuel
System Limitations, of Part 2--Airworthiness Limitation Items,
Revision 5, dated April 21, 2010, of Bombardier Q400 Dash 8
Maintenance Requirements Manual, PSM 1-84-7, and the service
information contained in Table 2 of this AD, as applicable, to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
The revision level for Bombardier Task 284000-417 in Section 4-1,
Fuel System Limitations, of Part 2--Airworthiness Limitation Items,
Revision 5, dated April 21, 2010, of Bombardier Q400 Dash 8
Maintenance Requirements Manual, PSM 1-84-7, is specified only on
the title page and page 1 of the record of Revisions of that
document. Page 4 of Section 4-1, Fuel System Limitations, of Part
2--Airworthiness Limitation Items, Revision 5, dated April 21, 2010,
of Bombardier Q400 Dash 8 Maintenance Requirements Manual, PSM 1-84-
7, is not listed in the Table of Contents of that document.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

          Table 2--Service Bulletins Incorporated by Reference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Document                  Revision               Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-  C.................  May 15, 2009
 28-03.
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-  B.................  October 21, 2009
 28-04.
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-  Original..........  June 28, 2006
 28-05.
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-  Original..........  August 1, 2008
 28-07.
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-  B.................  September 3, 2008
 57-09.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 10, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-15364 Filed 6-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


% Residential exposure, 30 days, daily shower, 10% dissipation daily
% Getting peak chlorpyrifos concentration at 60 pg/g in blood on the 14th day
% February 4, 2016
% Cecilia Tan

% Setting model parameters
use human_parameters_MRP
use preg_female_parameters
BWSW=1;	% Set BW to a fixed value
BWST=75;	% Set BW to 75 kg
PREG=0;		% Not pregnant
DZONE = 1;	% Turn on dermal exposure
KDIS = 0.1;	% 10% daily dissipation
TSTOP=1000;	%Simulation time in hours

% Dermal exposure
SAF= 0.5;	 	% Fraction of skin in contact with chlorpyrifos.
FAD=1;     	% Fraction of dose available to be absorbed. Values of <1 could be used if pesticide is encapsulated.
DERM = 64;		% dose in ug/kg for 8 h/day exposure
%DERM = 107;		% dose in ug/kg for 2 h/day exposure
D3=7;  %DAYS/WEEK
P2 = 8;	% hours/day
%P2 = 2;	%HRS/DAY
S2=0 ;%OFFSET FROM 0 START TIME (EG IF YOU WANT TO MODEL FROM MIDNIGHT, BUT DOSE AT 8 AM)
W2=30; %30 day exposure

prepare @clear@all
start @NoCallback
simall = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6*1000 _cvo*334.5*1000];	%conc unit = pg/g

save simall @file='residential_30day_02042016_8h' @format=ascii


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 58 (Friday, March 25, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16276-16277]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05921]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Hazardous Materials: Notice of Applications for Special Permits

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: List of Applications for Special Permits.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations (49 CFR part 107,
subpart B), notice is hereby given that the Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety has received the application described herein. Each
mode of transportation for which a particular special permit is
requested is indicated by a number in the ``Nature of Application''
portion of the table below as follows: 1--Motor vehicle, 2--Rail
freight, 3--Cargo vessel, 4--Cargo aircraft only, 5--Passenger-carrying
aircraft.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 25, 2016.

ADDRESSES COMMENTS TO: Record Center, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Washington, DC
20590.
    Comments should refer to the application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of comments is desired, include
a self-addressed stamped postcard showing the special permit number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Paquet, Director, Office of
Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits Division, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, East Building, PHH-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
Southeast, Washington, DC 20590-0001,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of the applications are available for
inspection in the Records Center, East Building, PHH-30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue Southeast, Washington, DC or at http://regulations.gov.
    This notice of receipt of applications for special permit is
published in accordance with Part 107 of the Federal hazardous
materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5117(6); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 10, 2016.
Donald Burger,
Chief, Office of the Special Permits and Approvals.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Regulation(s)       Nature of the special
   Application number     Docket  number        Applicant              affected             permits thereof
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              SPECIAL PERMITS DATA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9393-M..................  ..............  ITW Sexton, Inc......  178.33-8(a),          To modify the special
                                                                  178.65(a),            permit to authorize
                                                                  178.65(c).            burst testing and modify
                                                                                the pressure relief
                                                                                device (PRD)
                                                                                requirements.
10704-M.................  ..............  Boost Oxygen, LLC....  ....................  To modify the special
                                                                                permit to authorize a
                                                                                lower minimum burst
                                                                                pressure and pressure
                                                                                rating.
14282-M.................  ..............  Innovative Technology  177.835(g),           To modify the special
                                           Partnerships, LLC.     172.301(c).           permit to authorize the
                                                                                transportation in
                                                                                commerce of packages
                                                                                which may contain
                                                                                explosives and inert/
                                                                                benign cushioning to
                                                                                ensure the package is
                                                                                full.
16011-M.................  ..............  Americase, Inc.......  ....................  To modify the special
                                                                                permit to authorize a
                                                                                thermally insulated
                                                                                fiberboard packaging for
                                                                                transporting recalled
                                                                                and damaged lithium
                                                                                batteries and equipment
                                                                                powered by lithium
                                                                                batteries by reducing
                                                                                certain hazard
                                                                                communication
                                                                                requirements.
16081-M.................  ..............  Cabela's Incorporated  178.602, 173.22a(c).  To modify the special
                                                                                permit to authorize
                                                                                additional Division 1.4
                                                                                materials and no longer
                                                                                require a copy of the
                                                                                special permit to be
                                                                                furnished to the
                                                                                carrier.
16461-M.................  ..............  Coastal..............  ....................  To modify the
                                                                                Hydrotesting, special
                                                                                permit to LLC authorize
                                                                                the addition of an
                                                                                aluminum alloy not
                                                                                previously authorized
                                                                                under the terms of the
                                                                                special permit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2016-05921 Filed 3-24-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4909-60-M


We are working in Tier I with mechanisms Are mechanisms similar or dissimilar across phyla,

species, classes, etc.? In other words – What is the phylogeny of the various mechanisms? Attempt at `Problem Statement' In particular, what is the phylogeny of: 1.

Nuclear receptors – as they bind the the ligands and activate particular genes and pathways 2.

P450s – as they synthesize and metabolize most NR ligands Regrettably, will emphasis more of what we don't know, than what we know Nuclear Receptors Metazoan signaling pathways 5 Basic evolutionary groups:

based on DNA element structure (a repeated sequence, some serial repeats, some mirrored, and with n nucleotides spacer)

based on gene structure – intron/ extron point in DNA binding region of protein

based on amino acid sequence homology At this time,

steroid family (E,

A,

G,

P,

M)

appears to be unique to vertebrates. Echinoderms Hemichordates Urochordates Cephalochordates Vertebrates Poriferans Cnidarians Ctenophorans Gastrotrichs Nematodes Priapulids Kinorhynchs Onychophorans Tardigrades Arthropods Bryozoans Entoprocts Platyhelminthes Pogonophorans Brachiopods Phoronids Nemerteans Annelids Echiurans Molluscs Sipunculans Gnathostomulids Rotifers Metazoans Bilateria Deuterostomes Protostomes Lophotrochozoans Ecdysozoans Gastrotrichs Nematodes Priapulids Kinorhynchs Onychophorans Tardigrades Arthropods Bryozoans Entoprocts Platyhelminthes Pogonophorans Brachiopods Phoronids Nemerteans Annelids Echiurans Molluscs Sipunculans Gnathostomulids Rotifers Metazoans &

Nuclear Receptors ER        ,AR, GR, MR,

& PR        TR        ,ERR        , VDR,

RAR        , PPAR        Note: Greek letters indicate separate (multiple) forms of the receptor exist action ligand specificity, cell distribution may vary Vertebrates only: Steroid Family (??) "Others" also restricted to a few phyla Echinoderms Hemichordates Urochordates Cephalochordates Vertebrates Implications 1.

Is there a scientific basis or rationale to extrapolate an EAT based screen to other phyla? At this time,

probably not! 2.

This means we have no screens for the other phyla. They are unprotected! We have serious scientific gaps that need to be filled!!! Metazoans &

Nuclear Receptors Gastrotrichs Nematodes Priapulids Kinorhynchs Onychophorans Tardigrades Arthropods Bryozoans Entoprocts Platyhelminthes Pogonophorans Brachiopods Phoronids Nemerteans Annelids Echiurans Molluscs Sipunculans Gnathostomulids Rotifers ??

??

??

RXR                       COUP                    EcdR,

KNIRPS                    For invertebrates, outside Arthropods far less known about NucRec's and their transcriptional roles – some are identified only as genes Echinoderms Hemichordates Urochordates Cephalochordates Vertebrates Briefly, the P450s Far more ancient Far more diverse But a parallel way to analyze the problem Lipid synthetic tree of ligands DNA element Several core structures intron exon break in DNA region organization abcd abcd abcd dcba nucleotide( s) spacing Suggested analysis What are the nuclear receptors that are potential ED targets? What are the ligands (`

mimic targets')? What are the synthetic steps (P450scc, aromatase,

5

alpha reductase, …)? What then is the appropriate phyla for which a screen can and cannot be used? (And have a rationale basis to validate) N

terminus C

terminus DBD – DNA Binding Domain Zinc finger interaction Often repeated Several configurations distinguish receptor subclasses LBD – Ligand Binding Domain Large,

3 sided cavity Envelopes ligand Largely hydrophobic amino acids lining the cavity Nuclear Hormone Receptor Structure Nuclear Hormone Receptor Structure N

terminus C

terminus AF 1 Activation Factor 1 (site for activation by several kinase or phosphorylation pathways)

AF 2 Activation Factor 2 (interaction with other protein families – one represses and one activates) Essential for transcription D N A   R e s p o n s e   E l e e n t Nuclear Hormone Receptor Ligand Triggering Action #1 NH  receptor Li and

Bound Heat

Shock  Prote n (HSP)

chaperone complex CoRepressor Dissociation Receptor Dimer Formation This ` free' dimer

ppe rs susceptible  to proteolysis (ubiquitin)

Binding DNA Element Sites L NH  receptor Li and

Bound L NH  receptor Li and

Bound L N H    r e c e p t o r L i a n d   B o u n d L N H    r e c e p t o r L i a n d   B o u n d L Transcribing Genes Into mRNA RNA

polymerase  II or

pol  II

complex actually

transcribes, binds  DNA  at

TATA  box DNA  site  TATA

Box                                                Gene  Sta t (

AUG

codon)                    1.

Pol II Binds TATA Box 2.

Pol II oves Down DNA 3.

Pol II Initiates mRNA transcription Pol  II transcribin Base  0  fo  gene Base " X" #  bases  upst eam  fo  gene Nuclear Hormone ReceptorLigand Complex Action #2 D A

Response

Element

TATA

Box          RNA

polymerase  II or

pol  II

complex actually

transcribes, startin  at

TATA  box DNA  site  Response element for receptor is upstream of TATA box RNA pol II normally cannot bind to TATA box alone, transcription blocked Upstre m  of  t rget gene  by  X  b ses Nuclear Hormone ReceptorLigand Complex Action #2 D A

Response

Element

TATA

Box          RNA

polymerase  II or

pol  II

complex must  bind  TATA  box DNA  site  to

transcribe tar et

ene Receptor ligand (

holo receptor) does not interact directly with the Pol II complex NH  receptor Li and

Bound L NH  receptor Li and

Bound L Upstre m  of  t rget gene  by  X  b ses Upstre m  of

the

TATA  box  Y  b ses or  X

 Y  of  t rget  gene Nuclear Hormone ReceptorLigand Complex Action 2 D A

Response

Element

TATA

Box          RNA

polymerase  II or

pol  II

complex actually

transcribes, startin  at

TATA  box DNA  site  NH  receptor Li and

Bound L NH  receptor Li and

Bound L Recruitment of Coactivators is Necessary They are an Obligate `Bridge'

to Pol II complex* *

Receptor li and  can  bind  DNA  and  NOT

recruit  pol II =  Anta onist Chemical Numbers vs Chemical `Doses' Working Examples Perfume Raw Materials Salvito et al.

Env.

Toxicol. Chem. 21( 6):

1301 1308 Prediction of Environmental Concentrations (PECs) for >

2,

100 chemicals Prediction of PNEC – PEC/ PNEC ratio

prioritization Simonich et al.

Env. Sci.

Tech. 36( 13):

2839 2847. Measurement and Validation of PECs Thyroid Toxicological History Adverse Effects and Mechanisms Thyroid – goiter/

developmental toxicity Mechanisms elucidated 1940 1990:

Iodide deficiency or uptake blockade to thyroid

Inhibition of thyroid peroxidase

Blockage of thyroid T3/ T4 release

Increased T3/ T4 metabolism

Inhibition of 5'

deiodinase

Life stage sensitivity vs consequences Clear endpoints: thyroid histopathology, circulating T3/ T4 and TSH


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 47 (Monday, March 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13483-13484]
[FR Doc No: 2017-04831]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2016-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1670]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, the FIRM and FIS
report, once effective, will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before June 12, 2017.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location and the respective Community Map Repository address listed in
the tables below. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-1670 to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services

Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C
Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and also are used to calculate the appropriate
flood insurance premium rates for new buildings built after the FIRM
and FIS report become effective.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at http://floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_fact_sheet.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location and
the respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables.
For communities with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies
can be identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM
date listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and
FIS report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA
Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: February 16, 2017.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation, Department
of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

I. Non-watershed-based studies:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Saline County, Kansas and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Project: 11-07-1996S Preliminary Date: September 30, 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Assaria........................  City Hall, 315 East Main
                                          Street, Assaria, KS 67416.
City of Brookville.....................  City Office, 301 North Perry
                                          Street, Brookville, KS 67425.
City of Gypsum.........................  City Office, 521 Maple Street,
                                          Gypsum, KS 67448.
City of New Cambria....................  City Hall, 103 South Center
                                          Street, New Cambria, KS 67470.
City of Salina.........................  City of Salina Planning and
                                          Zoning Department, 300 West
                                          Ash Street, Salina, KS 67401.
City of Smolan.........................  Community Center, 320 3rd
                                          Street, Smolan, KS 67456.
Unincorporated Areas of Saline County..  Saline County Planning and
                                          Zoning Department, 300 West
                                          Ash Street, Salina, KS 67401.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           San Juan County, Washington and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Project: 14-10-0721S Preliminary Date: August 12, 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Town of Friday Harbor..................  San Juan Office of Community
                                          Development, 135 Rhone Street,
                                          Friday Harbor, WA 98250.
Unincorporated Areas of San Juan County  San Juan Office of Community
                                          Development, 135 Rhone Street,
                                          Friday Harbor, WA 98250.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2017-04831 Filed 3-10-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P