[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 207 (Monday, October 27, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63815-63818]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25502]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2014-0780]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Lower Mississippi River, Mile 170 to Mile 172;
Darrow, LA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule with request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
all waters of the Lower Mississippi River from mile marker 170 to mile
marker 172 extending the entire width of the river, in the vicinity of
the Houma's House Plantation and Garden, Darrow, LA. This safety zone
is necessary to protect persons and vessels from potential safety
hazards associated with a barge based fireworks display on

the Lower Mississippi River at mile marker 171. Entry into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) New Orleans or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective and enforceable from 9:00 p.m. to 10:00
p.m. on November 15, 2014. Comments and related material must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before November 6, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
[USCG-2014-0780]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH''. Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Christopher Norton, Coast Guard Marine Safety
Unit Baton Rouge; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl F. Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

AHP Above Head of Passes
BNM Broadcast notice to mariners
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MM Mile Marker
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

A. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

1. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
http://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2014-0780] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH''. Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.

2. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2014-0780] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH''. Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.

3. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

B. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this final rule without prior notice and
limited opportunity to comment in accordance with section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice when the
agency for good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not
completing the full notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) process with
respect to this rule. The Coast Guard received information about this
fireworks display on or about August 19, 2014. As scheduled, the
display would take place before the full NPRM process could be
completed. Because of the dangers presented by an aerial barge based
fireworks display taking place on and over the waterway, it is in the
public's interest to establish this safety zone to protect transiting
vessels and mariners. This rule provides for a comment period and
comments received will be reviewed to assist the Coast Guard in future
rulemakings establishing similar safety zones. Still, completing the
full NPRM process would be contrary to the public interest by delaying
the safety measures necessary to protect life and property from the
possible dangers and hazards associated with a nighttime barge based
fireworks display on the waterway. This display has also been
advertised to and planned on by the local community. Delaying this rule
to complete the full NPRM process would also be impracticable as it
would unnecessarily interfere with possible contractual obligations.
While it is in the public's best interest to provide this safety
measure, the impacts on navigation are expected to be minimal as the
safety zone will only be in effect for a short duration. The Coast
Guard will notify the public and maritime community that the safety
zone will be in effect and of its enforcement periods via broadcast
notices to mariners (BNM).
    For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Providing a full 30
days notice is contrary to the public interest as it would delay the
effectiveness of the safety zone until after the planned fireworks
event. Immediate action is needed to protect vessels and mariners from
the safety hazards associated with an aerial fireworks display over a
waterway.

C. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis and authorities for this rule are found in 33
U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703, 50 U.S.C. 191. 195; 33
CFR 1.05-1; 6.04-6, and 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; and
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard to establish and define
regulatory safety zones.
    J and M Displays, a company specializing in fireworks displays,
informed the Coast Guard of a fireworks display sponsored by Houma's
House Plantation and Garden and planned for November 15, 2014. The
fireworks will be launched from a barge located at MM 171 on the Lower
Mississippi River. This display will take place between 9:00 p.m. and
10:00 p.m. on November 15, 2014 in a high commercial traffic area.
Therefore, the Coast Guard has determined that a safety zone is needed
to ensure safe navigation for all those in the vicinity of the
fireworks display. This safety zone is needed to protect the public,
mariners, and vessels from the hazards associated with a barge based
fireworks display on and over the waterway.

D. Discussion of the Final Rule

    The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
Lower Mississippi River from 9:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. on November 15,
2014. The safety zone will include the entire width of the Lower
Mississippi River in Darrow, LA from mile marker 170 to mile marker
172. Entry into this zone is prohibited unless permission has been
granted by the COTP New Orleans, or a designated representative.
    The COTP New Orleans will inform the public through BNMs of the
enforcement period for the safety zone as well as any changes in the
planned schedule. Mariners and other members of the public may also
contact Coast Guard Sector New Orleans Command Center to inquire about
the status of the safety zone, at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

E. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. This safety zone will
restrict navigation on the Lower Mississippi River from MM 170 to MM
172, for approximately one hour on November 15, 2014. Due to the
limited scope and short duration of the safety zone, the impacts on
routine navigation are expected to be minimal.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit the Lower Mississippi River from MM 170 to MM 172 between 9:00
p.m. and 10:00 p.m. on November 15, 2014. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rile will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because it is
limited in scope and enforcement is anticipated to take place for only
one hour, from 9:00-10:00 p.m. on one day. Before enforcement, COTP New
Orleans will issue maritime advisories widely available to waterway
users and will make notifications to the public through marine band
radio when the safety zone is being enforced. Additionally, deviation
from this rule may be requested and will be considered on a case-by-
case basis by COTP New Orleans or a COTP New Orleans designated
representative.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INTFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This rule involves the establishment
of a temporary safety zone for all waters of the Lower Mississippi
River from MM 170 to MM 172. This rule is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant
Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist supporting
this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04.6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. A new temporary Sec.  165.T08-0780 is added to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T08-0780  Safety Zone, Lower Mississippi River, Mile 170 to
Mile 172; Darrow, LA.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the Lower Mississippi River from mile marker 170 to mile marker 172,
Darrow, LA.
    (b) Effective Date and Enforcement Period. This rule is effective
on November 15, 2014. The safety zone will be enforced from 9:00 p.m.
until 10:00 p.m. on November 15, 2014.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) New Orleans
or designated personnel. Designated personnel include commissioned,
warrant and petty officers of the U.S. Coast Guard assigned to units
under the operational control of USCG Sector New Orleans.
    (2) Vessels requiring deviation from this rule must request
permission from the COTP New Orleans or a COTP New Orleans designated
representative. They may be contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16 or 67, or
through Coast Guard Sector New Orleans at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Persons and vessels permitted to deviate from this safety zone
regulation and enter the restricted area must transit at the slowest
safe speed and comply with all lawful directions issued by the COTP New
Orleans or designated representative.
    (d) Information Broadcasts. The COTP New Orleans or a COTP New
Orleans designated representative will inform the public through
broadcast notices to mariners of the enforcement period for the safety
zone as well as any changes in the planned schedule.

    Dated: September 11, 2014.
P.C. Schifflin,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port New Orleans.
[FR Doc. 2014-25502 Filed 10-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


From:
Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent:
Thursday, May 12, 2022 12:24 PM
To:
Eric Stuart<EMAIL_ADDRESS>D'Angelo, Wayne J<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Joe Green<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Paul Balserak AISI<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:
publication date EAF NSPS proposal

Fyi - Electric Arc Furnace will publish on 5/16/2022 and Comment Period ends on 07/15/2022.

Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

Pronouns - She/Her/Hers
Salutation - Dr./Ms.


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 187 (Thursday, September 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59413-59414]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23521]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

International Civil Aviation Organization's (ICAO) Dangerous
Goods Panel; Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In preparation for the International Civil Aviation
Organization's (ICAO) Dangerous Goods Panel's (DGP's) meeting to be
held October 28-November 8, 2013, in Montreal, Canada, the FAA's Office
of Hazardous Materials Safety and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration's (PHMSA) Office of Hazardous Materials Safety
announce a public meeting.

DATES: The public meeting will be held on October 18, 2013 from 9 a.m.
until 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at FAA Headquarters (FOB
10A), Bessie Coleman Conference Center, 2nd Floor, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591.
    Participants are requested to register by using the following email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Please include your name, organization, email address, and indicate
whether you will be attending in person or participating via conference
call. Conference call connection information will be provided to those
who register and indicate that they will participate via conference
call.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the meeting can be
directed to Ms. Janet McLaughlin, Deputy Director, Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety, ADG-2, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 385-
4900. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Questions in advance of the
meeting for PHMSA can be directed to Mr. Duane Pfund, International
Standards Coordinator, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, PHH-10, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    We are committed to providing equal access to this meeting for all
participants. If you need alternative formats or other reasonable
accommodations, please call<PHONE_NUMBER> or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>with your request by close of business on October 11th.

Purpose of the Public Meeting

    Information and viewpoints provided by stakeholders are requested
as the United States delegation prepares for the International Civil
Aviation Organization's Dangerous Goods Panel's (ICAO DGP's) 24th Panel
Meeting. The agenda for the Working Group is as follows:

Agenda Item 1: Development of proposals, if necessary, for amendments
to Annex 18--The Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air
Agenda Item 2: Development of recommendations for amendments to the
Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air
(Doc 9284) for incorporation in the 2015-2016 Edition
Agenda Item 3: Development of recommendations for amendments to the
Supplement to the Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of
Dangerous Goods by Air (Doc 9284SU) for incorporation in the 2015-2016
Edition
Agenda Item 4: Development of recommendations for amendments to the
Emergency Response Guidance for Aircraft Incidents involving Dangerous
Goods (Doc 9481) for incorporation in the 2015-2016 Edition
Agenda Item 5: Resolution, where possible, of the non-recurrent work
items identified by the Air Navigation Commission or the panel:
    5.1: Review of provisions for the transport of lithium batteries
    5.2: Dangerous goods incident and accident data collection
    5.3: Dangerous goods requirements in Annex 6--Operation of Aircraft
    5.4: Development of guidance material on countering the potential
use of dangerous goods in an act of unlawful interference
    5.5: Development of performance standards for air operators and
designated postal operators
Agenda Item 6: Other business

    Papers relevant to these agenda items can be viewed at the
following Web page: http://www.icao.int/safety/DangerousGoods/Pages/DGP.aspx.

Public Meeting Procedures

    A panel of representatives from the FAA and PHMSA will be present.
The meetings are intended to be informal, non-adversarial, and to
facilitate the public comment process. No individual will be subject to
questioning by any other participant. Government representatives on the
panel may ask questions to clarify statements. Unless

otherwise stated, any statement made during the meetings by a panel
member should not be construed as an official position of the US
government.
    The meeting will be open to all persons, subject to the capacity of
the meeting room and phone lines available for those participating via
conference call. Every effort will be made to accommodate all persons
wishing to attend. The FAA and PHMSA will try to accommodate all
speakers, subject to time constraints.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 20, 2013.
Christopher Glasow,
Director, Office of Hazardous Materials Safety.
[FR Doc. 2013-23521 Filed 9-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: March 25, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 58)]
[Notices]
[Page 15815-15817]
[DOCID:fr25mr08-107]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-57525; File No. SR-FINRA-2008-005]

Self-Regulatory Organizations: Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Amendments to the Codes of Arbitration Procedure To Permit Submissions
to Arbitrators After a Case Has Closed Under Limited Circumstances

 March 18, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on February 7, 2008, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') (f/k/a National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
(``NASD'')) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been substantially prepared by FINRA.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    FINRA is proposing Rule 12905 of the NASD Code of Arbitration
Procedure for Customer Disputes (``Customer Code'') and Rule 13905 of
the NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure for Industry Disputes
(``Industry Code'') to permit submissions to arbitrators after a case
has closed only under the following circumstances: (1) As ordered by a
court; (2) at the request of any party within 30 days of service of an
award or notice that a matter has been closed, for ministerial matters;
or (3) if all parties agree and submit documents within 30 days of
service of an award or notice that a matter has been closed. Below is
the text of the proposed rule change. All the text is new.
* * * * *
12905. Submissions After a Case Has Closed
    (a) Parties may not submit documents to arbitrator(s) in cases that
have been closed except under the following limited circumstances:
     As ordered by a court;
     At the request of any party within 30 days of service of
an award or notice that a matter has been closed, for ministerial
matters such as miscalculation of figures, mistake in the description
of any person, thing or property referred to in the award, or if the
award is imperfect in a matter of form that does not affect the
decision on the merits; or
     If all parties agree and submit documents within 30 days
of (1) service of an award or (2) notice that a matter has been closed.
    (b) Parties must make requests under this rule in writing to the
Director and must include the basis relied on under this rule for the
request. The Director will forward the documents, along with any
responses from other parties, to the arbitrators. Unless the
arbitrators rule within 20 days after the Director forwards the
documents to the arbitrators, the request shall be deemed denied.
13905. Submissions After a Case Has Closed
    (a) Parties may not submit documents to arbitrator(s) in cases that
have been closed except under the following limited circumstances:
     As ordered by a court;
     At the request of any party within 30 days of service of
an award or notice that a matter has been closed, for

ministerial matters such as miscalculation of figures, mistake in the
description of any person, thing or property referred to in the award,
or if the award is imperfect in a matter of form that does not affect
the decision on the merits; or
     If all parties agree and submit documents within 30 days
of (1) service of an award or (2) notice that a matter has been closed.
    (b) Parties must make requests under this rule in writing to the
Director and must include the basis relied on under this rule for the
request. The Director will forward the documents, along with any
responses from other parties, to the arbitrators. Unless the
arbitrators rule within 20 days after the Director forwards the
documents to the arbitrators, the request shall be deemed denied.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, FINRA included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. FINRA has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    FINRA is proposing to amend its Customer Code and Industry Code to
adopt new rules to permit submissions to arbitrators after a case has
closed only under limited circumstances. The proposed rule change would
reduce attorneys' fees and other costs associated with responding to
such submissions and would support the finality of arbitration awards
issued in the forum.
    FINRA staff receives several requests each year from parties to
submit documents to arbitrators (the panel) in cases that have been
closed for long periods of time. Parties file these requests for a
number of reasons, such as to obtain expungement relief that a party
failed to request during the life of the case, to correct what a party
perceives to be a mistake in the award, or to request that forum fee
allocations be changed.
    Currently, the Customer and Industry Codes do not contain deadlines
for such submissions and, indeed, do not address the matter. Therefore,
staff forwards to panels the requests, along with any responses from
other parties, regardless of the time that has elapsed since the case
was closed. The panels rarely determine to reopen a matter.
    A case is deemed closed on the date FINRA serves an award or sends
to the parties a letter notifying them that a case is closed (for
example, by settlement). The absence of deadlines in the Customer and
Industry Codes for submissions in closed cases can cause numerous
problems. For example, parties might submit documents to the panel
years after cases have closed. Also, arbitrators might have resigned
from the roster or died by the time such submissions are made. Finally,
parties might incur substantial attorneys' fees and other costs in
responding to closed-case submissions.
    Potential legal issues are also present. Some states empower
arbitrators to correct technical or mathematical errors in their
awards, but only for a short period of time following the award's
issuance, and courts may remand a matter to the original arbitrators
when they vacate awards in whole or in part.\3\ Beyond these examples,
however, the law generally provides that the arbitrators' authority
ends when the arbitrators render their decisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See N.Y. CPLR 7509, 7511 (McKinney 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To address the problems associated with submissions in closed
cases, FINRA is proposing to permit submissions to arbitrators after a
case has closed only under the following limited circumstances:
     As ordered by a court;
     At the request of any party within 30 days of service of
an award or notice that a matter has been closed, for ministerial
matters such as miscalculation of figures, mistake in the description
of any person, thing or property referred to in the award, or if the
award is imperfect in a matter of form that does not affect the
decision on the merits; or
     If all parties agree and submit documents within 30 days
of (1) service of an award or (2) notice that a matter has been closed.
    The 30-day limit is in line with time limits allowed under many
state laws \4\ and would ensure that a majority of the arbitrators that
served on the panel will be available to review the submissions. Under
the second alternative, request by only one party, FINRA would follow
its normal procedure of soliciting a response from the other parties
before forwarding the request to the panel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Id.; see also, CAL. CODE CIV. PROC. 1284 (2007); FLA. STAT.
682.10 (2007); TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. 171.054 (2007); VA. CODE ANN.
8.01-581.08 (2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\5\ which requires, among
other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The proposed rule change would reduce the costs
associated with responding to submissions in closed cases and support
the finality of arbitration awards issued in the forum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    FINRA does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-FINRA-2008-005 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2008-005. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of FINRA.
    All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2008-005
and should be submitted on or before April 15, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-5964 Filed 3-24-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 2674-2676]
[FR Doc No: 2012-928]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0046; Directorate Identifier 2011-CE-040-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Glasflugel Gliders

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Glasflugel Models Standard Libelle-201B, Club Libelle 205, Mosquito,
and Kestrel gliders. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as corrosion
damage to the elevator control rod that could lead to failure of the
elevator control rod, possibly resulting in loss of control of the
glider. We are issuing this proposed AD to require actions to address
the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 5, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Glasfaser Flugzeug-Service Hansj[ouml]rg Streifeneder GmbH, D-72582
Grabenstetten, Germany; phone: +49(0)73821032, fax: +49(0)73821629;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: www.streifly.de/. You may review
copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0046;
Directorate Identifier 2011-CE-040-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent

for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA AD
No.: 2011-0213R1, dated November 8, 2011 (referred to after this as
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:

    A broken elevator control rod in the vertical fin on a Kestrel
sailplane has been reported. The technical investigation revealed
that water had soaked into the elevator control rod through a
control bore hole and resulted in corrosion damage. The
investigation concluded as well that the corrosion cannot be
detected from outside the elevator control rod.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to
failure of the elevator control rod, possibly resulting in loss of
control of the sailplane.
    To address this unsafe condition, Glasfaser Flugzeug-Service
GmbH have developed and published Technical Note (TN) TN 201-40, TN
205-27, TN 206-26, TN 303-25, TN 304-12, TN 401-30, TN 501-10, TN
604-11, which provides instructions for elevator control rod
inspection and replacement.
    For the reasons described above, EASA issued AD 2011-0213 to
require a one-time inspection and replacement of the affected
elevator control rod with an improved part.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Glasfaser Flugzeug-Service GmbH has issued Technical Note TN 201-
40, TN 205-27, TN 206-26, TN 303-25, TN 304-12, TN 401-30, TN 501-10,
and TN 604-11, Revision 1, dated July 14, 2011 (EASA translation
approval dated September 9, 2011). The actions described in this
service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 54 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 6 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost
about $333 per product.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $45,522, or $843 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

     Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Glasflugel: Docket No. FAA-2012-0046; Directorate Identifier 2011-
CE-040-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by March 5, 2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the following Glasflugel models and serial
number (S/N) gliders, certificated in any category:
    (1) Club Libelle 205, all S/Ns
    (2) Kestrel, all S/Ns, except S/N 85, 110, and 125
    (3) Mosquito, all S/Ns
    (4) Standard Libelle-201B, S/N 169

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 27: Flight
Controls.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as corrosion damage
to the elevator control rod that could lead to failure of the
elevator control rod, possibly resulting in loss of control of the
glider. We are issuing this proposed AD to require actions to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

(f) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following actions:
    (1) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, inspect
the elevator control rod in the vertical fin following Glasfaser
Flugzeug-Service GmbH Technical Note TN 201-40, TN 205-27, TN 206-
26, TN 303-25, TN 304-12, TN 401-30, TN 501-10, and TN 604-11,
Revision 1, dated July 14, 2011 (EASA translation approval dated
September 9, 2011), as applicable to glider model.
    (2) If you find any discrepancy in the inspection required by
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, before further flight, replace the
elevator control rod with an elevator control rod that does not have
a control bore hole, following Glasfaser Flugzeug-Service GmbH
Technical Note TN 201-40, TN 205-27, TN 206-26, TN 303-25, TN 304-
12, TN 401-30, TN 501-10, and TN 604-11, Revision 1, dated July 14,
2011 (EASA translation approval dated September 9, 2011), as
applicable to glider model.
    (3) Within 9 months after the effective date of this AD, unless
already done as required by paragraph (f)(2) of this AD, replace the
elevator control rod in the vertical fin with

an elevator control rod that does not have a control bore hole,
following Glasfaser Flugzeug-Service GmbH Technical Note TN 201-40,
TN 205-27, TN 206-26, TN 303-25, TN 304-12, TN 401-30, TN 501-10,
and TN 604-11, Revision 1, dated July 14, 2011 (EASA translation
approval dated September 9, 2011), as applicable to glider model.
    (4) As of the effective date of this AD, do not install an
elevator control rod with a control bore hole on the side.

(g) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Jim Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, a Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

(h) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.:
2011-0213R1, dated November 8, 2011; and Glasfaser Flugzeug-Service
GmbH Technical Note TN 201-40, TN 205-27, TN 206-26, TN 303-25, TN
304-12, TN 401-30, TN 501-10, and TN 604-11, Revision 1, dated July
14, 2011 (EASA translation approval dated September 9, 2011), for
related information. For service information related to this AD,
contact Glasfaser Flugzeug-Service Hansj[ouml]rg Streifeneder GmbH,
D-72582 Grabenstetten, Germany; phone: +49(0)73821032, fax:
+49(0)73821629; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: www.streifly.de/.
You may review copies of the referenced service information at the
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on January 11, 2012.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-928 Filed 1-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61083]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24038]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0001]

Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and
recommendations to the Agency on FDA's regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on November 6, 2014, from 8
a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Location: FDA White Oak Campus, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31
Conference Center, the Great Room (Rm. 1503), Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002. Information regarding special accommodations due to a disability,
visitor parking, and transportation may be accessed at: http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm; under the heading
``Resources for You,'' click on ``Public Meetings at the FDA White Oak
Campus.'' Please note that visitors to the White Oak Campus must enter
through Building 1.
    Contact Person: Caleb Briggs, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
31 Rm. 2417, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>, Fax: 301-847-
8533, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or FDA Advisory Committee Information
Line, 1-800-741-8138<PHONE_NUMBER> in the Washington, DC area). A
notice in the Federal Register about last minute modifications that
impact a previously announced advisory committee meeting cannot always
be published quickly enough to provide timely notice. Therefore, you
should always check the Agency's Web site at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm and scroll down to the appropriate
advisory committee meeting link, or call the advisory committee
information line to learn about possible modifications before coming to
the meeting.
    Agenda: During the morning session, the committee will discuss new
drug application (NDA) 205353, panobinostat capsules, application
submitted by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. The proposed
indication (use) for this product is in combination with bortezomib and
dexamethasone, for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who
have received at least one prior therapy.
    During the afternoon session, the committee will discuss NDA
206317, ferric pyrophosphate solution, for administration via
hemodialysis dialysate, application submitted by Rockwell Medical, Inc.
The proposed indications (uses) for this product are for the treatment
of iron loss or iron deficiency to maintain hemoglobin in adult
patients with hemodialysis-dependent stage 5 chronic kidney disease and
to reduce the prescribed dose of erythropoiesis stimulating agent
required to maintain desired hemoglobin levels.
    FDA intends to make background material available to the public no
later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post
the background material on its Web site prior to the meeting, the
background material will be made publicly available at the location of
the advisory committee meeting, and the background material will be
posted on FDA's Web site after the meeting. Background material is
available at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/Calendar/default.htm. Scroll down to the appropriate advisory committee meeting
link.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee.
Written submissions may be made to the contact person on or before
October 23, 2014. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled
between approximately 10:30 a.m. to 11 a.m., and 3:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.
Those individuals interested in making formal oral presentations should
notify the contact person and submit a brief statement of the general
nature of the evidence or arguments they wish to present, the names and
addresses of proposed participants, and an indication of the
approximate time requested to make their presentation on or before
October 15, 2014. Time allotted for each presentation may be limited.
If the number of registrants requesting to speak is greater than can be
reasonably accommodated during the scheduled open public hearing
session, FDA may conduct a lottery to determine the speakers for the
scheduled open public hearing session. The contact person will notify
interested persons regarding their request to speak by October 16,
2014.
    Persons attending FDA's advisory committee meetings are advised
that the Agency is not responsible for providing access to electrical
outlets.
    FDA welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory committee
meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons with
physical disabilities or special needs. If you require special
accommodations due to a disability, please contact Caleb Briggs at
least 7 days in advance of the meeting.
    FDA is committed to the orderly conduct of its advisory committee
meetings. Please visit our Web site at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm111462.htm for procedures
on public conduct during advisory committee meetings.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    September 30, 2014.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014-24038 Filed 10-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


MEMORANDUM
DATE:		February 12, 2015
TO:	 	Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket id: OAR-2013-0602
FROM: 		Region 5, EPA
SUBJECT:	February 11, 2015, Conference Call with Ohio EPA to Clarify Comments on the Clean Power Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY
On February 11, 2015, EPA and Ohio held a conference call to clarify comments Ohio submitted to EPA on the Clean Power Plan.  Ohio will provide data to EPA in order to correct information from the EIA dataset.
PARTICIPANTS
OAP:  		Misha Adamantiades, Erika Wilson, Travis Johnson
Region 5:  	Alexis Cain, Erin Newman
Ohio EPA:	Robert Hodanbosi, Adam Ward, Chris Beekman, Jennifer Van Vlerah


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35641-35642]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15232]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP15-511-000]

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC; Notice of Request
Under Blanket Authorization

    Take notice that on June 4, 2015, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC (Transco), pursuant to its blanket certificate
authorization granted in Docket No. CP82-426-000,\1\ filed an
application in accordance to sections 157.205 and 157.216 of the
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) as amended,
requesting authority to abandon certain pipeline facilities and
removing related ancillary facilities, as necessary, located in
Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana. The proposed abandonment are no longer
required for gas service, all as more fully set forth in the
application which is on file with the Commission and open to public
inspection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 20 FERC ] 62,420 (1982).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Transco requests authorization to abandon an approximately 1.1-
mile, 16-inch pipeline extending from Ship Shoal Block 28, Platform
``C'' to Ship Shoal Block 28, Platform ``D1''; an approximately 10.5
mile, 16-inch pipeline extending from Ship Shoal Block 28, Platform
``D1'' to the Mosquito Bay Junction Platform ``A''; and approximately
0.03-mile, 12-inch pipeline extending from Ship Shoal Block 28,
Platform ``D2'' to a subsea tie-in with the 16-inch pipeline (Supply
Laterals). The Supply Laterals will be abandoned in place. The tube
turns and portions of the risers will be recovered and taken to shore.
The Supply Laterals have not been used in the previous 12 months to
provide service and are not expected to be used in the future. The
proposed abandonment will have no impact on the daily design capacity
and operating conditions of Transco's pipeline system. No customers
have been served through the Supply Laterals during the previous 12
months.
    Any questions concerning this application may be directed to Marg
Camardello, P.O. Box 1396, Houston, Texas 77251, or by phone at (713)
215-3380.
    This filing is available for review at the Commission or may be
viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number filed to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at FERC
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or, for
TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. Comments, protests and interventions may
be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
interveners to file electronically.
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice, the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 60 days after
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to section 157.205 of
the regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to the
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, the
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and
not withdrawn within 30 days after the allowed time for filing a
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to section 7 of the NGA.

    Dated: June 16, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-15232 Filed 6-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-0-P