[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 210 (Friday, October 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66896-66897]
[FR Doc No: 2015-27673]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP16-5-000]

Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request Under
Blanket Authorization

    Take notice that on October 13, 2015 Eastern Shore Natural Gas
Company (Eastern Shore), 1110 Forrest Avenue, Dover, Delaware, 19904,
filed in the above referenced docket a prior notice application
pursuant to sections 157.205, 157.208, and 157.210 of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations under the
Natural Gas Act (NGA), and Eastern Shore's blanket certificate issued
in Docket No. CP96-128-000. Eastern Shore seeks authorization to
increase the certificated capacity of its Receipt Zone 1 facilities by
53,000 dekatherms per day, all as more fully set forth in the
application, which is open to the public for inspection.
    The filing may also be viewed on the Web at http://www.ferc.gov
using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last
three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions concerning this application may be directed to
William Rice, King & Spalding LLP, 1700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite
200, Washington, DC 20006, by phone<PHONE_NUMBER>, by fax<PHONE_NUMBER>,
or by email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Specifically, Eastern Shore's Receipt Zone 1 consists of eight-mile
long sixteen-inch diameter pipeline and interconnect with Texas Eastern
Transmission, LP (Texas Eastern) in Chester County, PA. Eastern Shore
proposes to increase meter capacity and upgrade pressure and flow
control equipment at the interconnect with Texas Eastern to accommodate
additional capacity. Eastern Shore states that proposed project has
been designed based on the customer requests received during an open
season that Eastern Shore conducted in the month of June, 2015. Eastern
Shore further states that the total estimated cost of the project is
$1,375,038 and will be covered by the customer commitments.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 60 days after
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to section 157.205 of
the regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to the
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, the
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and
not withdrawn within 30 days after the allowed time for filing a
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to section 7 of the NGA.
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding, or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426.

    Dated: October 23, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-27673 Filed 10-29-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 120 (Tuesday, June 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36013-36014]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15378]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Extension: Rule 12b-1]; OMB Control No. 3235-0212, SEC File No. 270-
188]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget a request for extension of the previously
approved collection of information discussed below.
    Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR
270.12b-1) permits a registered open-end investment company (``fund''
or ``mutual fund'') to bear expenses associated with the distribution
of its shares, provided that the mutual fund complies with certain
requirements, including, among other things, that it adopt a written
plan (``rule 12b-1 plan'') and that it has in writing any agreements
relating to the rule 12b-1 plan. The rule in part requires that (i) the
adoption or material amendment of a rule 12b-1 plan be approved by the
mutual fund's directors, including its independent directors, and, in
certain circumstances, its shareholders; (ii) the board review
quarterly reports of

amounts spent under the rule 12b-1 plan; and (iii) the board, including
the independent directors, consider continuation of the rule 12b-1 plan
and any related agreements at least annually. Rule 12b-1 also requires
mutual funds relying on the rule to preserve for six years, the first
two years in an easily accessible place, copies of the rule 12b-1 plan
and any related agreements and reports, as well as minutes of board
meetings that describe the factors considered and the basis for
adopting or continuing a rule 12b-1 plan.
    Rule 12b-1 also prohibits funds from paying for distribution of
fund shares with brokerage commissions on their portfolio transactions.
The rule requires funds that use broker-dealers that sell their shares
to also execute their portfolio securities transactions, to implement
policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent: (i) The persons
responsible for selecting broker-dealers to effect transactions in fund
portfolio securities from taking into account broker-dealers'
promotional or sales efforts when making those decisions; and (ii) a
fund, its adviser or principal underwriter, from entering into any
agreement under which the fund directs brokerage transactions or
revenue generated by those transactions to a broker-dealer to pay for
distribution of the fund's (or any other fund's) shares.
    The board and shareholder approval requirements of rule 12b-1 are
designed to ensure that fund shareholders and directors receive
adequate information to evaluate and approve a rule 12b-1 plan and,
thus, are necessary for investor protection. The requirement of
quarterly reporting to the board is designed to ensure that the rule
12b-1 plan continues to benefit the fund and its shareholders. The
recordkeeping requirements of the rule are necessary to enable
Commission staff to oversee compliance with the rule. The requirement
that funds or their advisers implement, and fund boards approve,
policies and procedures in order to prevent persons charged with
allocating fund brokerage from taking distribution efforts into account
is designed to ensure that funds' selection of brokers to effect
portfolio securities transactions is not influenced by considerations
about the sale of fund shares.
    Based on information filed with the Commission by funds, Commission
staff estimates that there are approximately 7837 mutual fund
portfolios that have at least one share class subject to a rule 12b-1
plan.\1\ However, many of these portfolios are part of an affiliated
group of funds or mutual fund family that is overseen by a common board
of directors. Although the board must review and approve the rule 12b-1
plan for each fund separately, we have allocated the costs and hourly
burden related to rule 12b-1 based on the number of fund families that
have at least one fund that charges rule 12b-1 fees, rather than on the
total number of mutual fund portfolios that individually have a rule
12b-1 plan.\2\ Based on information filed with the Commission, the
staff estimates that there are approximately 330 fund families with
common boards of directors that have at least one fund with a rule 12b-
1 plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ This estimate is based on information from the Commission's
NSAR database.
    \2\ This allocation is based on previous conversations with fund
representatives on how fund boards comply with the requirements of
rule 12b-1. Despite this allocation of hourly burdens and costs, the
number of annual responses each year will continue to depend on the
number of fund portfolios with rule 12b-1 plans rather than the
number of fund families with rule 12b-1 plans. The staff estimates
that the number of annual responses per fund portfolio will be four
per year (quarterly, with the annual reviews taking place at one of
the quarterly intervals). Thus, we estimate that funds will make
31,348 responses (7837 fund portfolios x 4 responses per fund
portfolio = 31,348 responses) each year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on previous conversations with fund representatives,
Commission staff estimates that for each of the 330 mutual fund
families with a portfolio that has a rule 12b-1 plan, the average
annual burden of complying with the rule is 425 hours. This estimate
takes into account the time needed to prepare quarterly reports to the
board of directors, the board's consideration of those reports, and the
board's initial or annual consideration of whether to continue the
plan.\3\ We therefore estimate that the total hourly burden per year
for all funds to comply with current information collection
requirements under rule 12b-1, is 140,250 hours (330 fund families x
425 hours per fund family = 140,250 hours).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ We do not estimate any costs or time burden related to the
recordkeeping requirements in rule 12b-1, as funds are either
required to maintain these records pursuant to other rules or would
keep these records in any case as a matter of business practice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If a currently operating fund seeks to (i) adopt a new rule 12b-1
plan or (ii) materially increase the amount it spends for distribution
under its rule 12b-1 plan, rule 12b-1 requires that the fund obtain
shareholder approval. As a consequence, the fund will incur the cost of
a proxy.\4\ Based on previous conversations with fund representatives,
Commission staff estimates that approximately three funds per year
prepare a proxy in connection with the adoption or material amendment
of a rule 12b-1 plan. Funds typically hire outside legal counsel and
proxy solicitation firms to prepare, print, and mail such proxies. The
staff further estimates that the cost of each fund's proxy is $34,372.
Thus the total annual cost burden of rule 12b-1 to the fund industry is
$103,116 (3 funds requiring a proxy x $34,372 per proxy).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ In general, a fund adopts a rule 12b-1 plan before it begins
operations. Therefore, the fund is not required to obtain the
approval of its public shareholders because the fund's shares have
not yet been offered to the public.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The estimate of average burden hours is made solely for the
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, and is not derived from a
comprehensive or even a representative survey or study of the costs of
Commission rules and forms.
    The collections of information required by rule 12b-1 are necessary
to obtain the benefits of the rule. Notices to the Commission will not
be kept confidential. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless
it displays a currently valid control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this
information collection at the following Web site, www.reginfo.gov.
Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30
days of this notice.

    Dated: June 18, 2015.
Brent Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-15378 Filed 6-22-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 96 (Thursday, May 20, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27338-27340]
[FR Doc No: 2021-10523]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

29 CFR Part 1910

[Docket No. OSHA-2019-0001]
RIN 1218-AC93

Hazard Communication Standard

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of informal hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSHA is scheduling an informal public hearing on its proposed
rule ``Hazard Communication Standard.'' The public hearing will begin
September 21, 2021 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time (ET). The proposed rule
was published in the Federal Register on February 16, 2021. The initial
public comment period was to end April 19, 2021, but was extended to
May 19, 2021, in response to requests from the public.

DATES: Informal public hearing: The hearing will begin September 21,
2021, at 10:00 a.m., ET, and will be held virtually using WebEx. If
necessary, the hearing will continue from 9:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.,
ET, on subsequent days. Additional information on how to access the
informal hearing will be posted when available at https://www.osha.gov/hazcom/rulemaking. To testify or question witnesses at the hearing,
interested persons must electronically submit their notice by June 18,
2021. In addition, those who request more than ten minutes for their
presentation at the informal hearing and those who intend to submit
documentary evidence at the hearing must submit the full text of their
testimony, as well as a copy of any documentary evidence, no later than
August 21, 2021.

ADDRESSES:
    Notices of Intent to Appear: Notices of intent to appear at the
hearing, along with any submissions and attachments, should be
submitted electronically at https://www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for making
electronic submissions. After accessing ``all documents and comments''
in the docket (Docket No. OSHA-2019-0001), check the ``proposed rule''
box in the column headed ``Document Type,'' find the document posted on
the date of publication of this hearing notice, and click the ``Comment
Now'' link. When uploading multiple attachments to www.regulations.gov,
please number all of your attachments because www.regulations.gov will
not automatically number the attachments. This will be very useful in
identifying all attachments in the preamble. For example, Attachment
1_title of your document, Attachment 2_title of your document,
Attachment 3_title of your document. For assistance with commenting
and uploading documents, please see the Frequently Asked Questions on
regulations.gov.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency's name and
the docket number for this rulemaking (Docket No. OSHA-2019-0001). All
comments, including any personal information you provide, are placed in
the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about
submitting information they do not want made available to the public,
or submitting materials that contain personal information (either about
themselves or others), such as Social Security Numbers and birthdates.
    Docket: To read or download comments, notices of intent to appear,
and other materials submitted in the docket, go to Docket No. OSHA-
2019-0001 at https://www.regulations.gov. All comments and submissions
are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index; however, some
information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly available to
read or download through that website. All comments and submissions,
including copyrighted material, are available for inspection through
the OSHA Docket Office.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Documents submitted to the docket by OSHA or stakeholders
are assigned document identification numbers (Document ID) for easy
identification and retrieval. The full Document ID is the docket
number plus a unique four-digit code. OSHA is identifying supporting
information in this notice by author name, publication year, and the
last four digits of the Document ID.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For press inquiries: Contact Frank

Meilinger, Director, Office of Communications, Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor; telephone: (202) 693-
1999; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For general information and technical inquiries: Contact Maureen
Ruskin, Acting Director, Directorate of Standards and Guidance,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER> or fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For Hearing Inquiries: Contact Janet Carter, Directorate of
Standards and Guidance, Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 16, 2021, OSHA published a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to modify the Hazard Communication
Standard (HCS) to align with the United Nations' Globally Harmonized
System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) Revision 7,
to address specific issues that have arisen since OSHA last updated the
HCS in 2012, and to provide better alignment with other U.S. agencies
and international trading partners, without lowering the overall
protections of the standard.
    OSHA received comments concerning the proposed rule during the
comment period, which ended May 19, 2021. Commenters shared information
on a variety of topics including proposed definitions of ``release for
shipment'' and ``immediate outer container,'' changes to paragraph
(d)(1) ``normal conditions of use,'' and clarification of compliance
dates. OSHA received two requests for an informal public hearing
(Document ID 0276 and 0294).

Informal Public Hearing--Purpose, Rules and Procedures

    OSHA invites interested persons to participate in this rulemaking
by providing oral testimony and documentary evidence at the informal
public hearing. OSHA also welcomes presentation of data and documentary
evidence that will provide the agency with the best available evidence
to use in developing the final rule.
    Pursuant to 29 CFR 1911.15(a) and 5 U.S.C. 553(c), members of the
public have an opportunity at the informal public hearing to provide
oral testimony and evidence on issues raised by the proposal. An
administrative law judge (ALJ) will preside over the hearing and will
resolve any procedural matters relating to the hearing.
    OSHA's regulation governing public hearings (29 CFR 1911.15)
establishes the purpose and procedures of informal public hearings.
Although the presiding officer of the hearing is an ALJ and questioning
of witnesses is allowed on crucial issues, the proceeding is largely
informal and essentially legislative in purpose. Therefore, the hearing
provides interested persons with an opportunity to make oral
presentations in the absence of rigid procedures that could impede or
protract the rulemaking process. The hearing is not an adjudicative
proceeding subject to the Federal Rules of Evidence. Instead, it is an
informal administrative proceeding convened for the purpose of
gathering and clarifying information. Accordingly, questions of
relevance, procedure, and participation generally will be resolved in
favor of developing a clear, accurate, and complete record.
    Conduct of the hearing will conform to 29 CFR 1911.15. In addition,
pursuant to 29 CFR 1911.4, the Acting Assistant Secretary may, on
reasonable notice, issue additional or alternative procedures to
expedite the proceedings, to provide greater procedural protections to
interested persons, or to further any other good cause consistent with
applicable law. Although the ALJ presiding over the hearing makes no
decision or recommendation on the merits of the proposal, the ALJ has
the responsibility and authority necessary to ensure that the hearing
progresses at a reasonable pace and in an orderly manner. To ensure a
full and fair hearing, the ALJ has the power to regulate the course of
the proceedings; dispose of procedural requests, objections, and
comparable matters; confine presentations to matters pertinent to the
issues the proposed rule raises; use appropriate means to regulate the
conduct of persons present at the hearing; question witnesses and
permit others to do so; limit the time for such questioning; and leave
the record open for a reasonable time after the hearing for the
submission of additional data, evidence, comments, and arguments from
those who participated in the hearing (29 CFR 1911.16).
    At the close of the hearing, there will be a post-hearing comment
period for interested persons who filed a timely notice of intention to
appear at the hearing, during which those persons may submit final
briefs, arguments, summations, and additional data and information to
OSHA.

Notice of Intention To Appear at the Hearing

    Interested persons who intend to participate in and provide oral
testimony or documentary evidence at the hearing must file a written
notice of intention to appear prior to the hearing. To testify or
question witnesses at the hearing, interested persons must
electronically submit their notice by June 18, 2021. The notice must
provide the following information:
    Name, address, email address, and telephone number of each
individual who will give oral testimony;
    Name of the establishment or organization each individual
represents, if any;
    Occupational title and position of each individual testifying;
    Approximate amount of time required for each individual's
testimony;
    A brief statement of the position each individual will take with
respect to the issues raised by the proposed rule; and
    A brief summary of documentary evidence each individual intends to
present. Individuals who request more than 10 minutes to present their
oral testimony at the hearing or who will submit documentary evidence
at the hearing must submit the full text of their testimony and all
documentary evidence no later than August 21, 2021.
    The agency will review each submission and determine if the
information it contains warrants the amount of time the individual
requested for the presentation. If OSHA believes the requested time is
excessive, the agency will allocate an appropriate amount of time for
the presentation. The agency also may limit to 10 minutes the
presentation of any participant who fails to comply substantially with
these procedural requirements, and may request that the participant
return for questioning at a later time. Before the hearing, OSHA will
notify participants of the time the agency will allow for their
presentation and, if less than requested, the reasons for its decision.
In addition, before the hearing, OSHA will provide the hearing
procedures and hearing schedule to each participant who filed a notice
of intention to appear. OSHA emphasizes that the hearing is open to the
public; however, only individuals who file a notice of intention to
appear may question witnesses and participate fully at the hearing. If
time permits, and at the discretion of the ALJ, an individual who did
not file a notice of intention to appear may be allowed to testify at
the hearing, but for no more than 10 minutes.

Certification of the Hearing Record and Agency Final Determination

    Following the close of the hearing and the post-hearing comment
periods, the ALJ will certify the record to the Assistant Secretary of
Labor for Occupational Safety and Health. The

record will consist of all of the written comments, oral testimony, and
documentary evidence received during the proceeding. The ALJ, however,
will not make or recommend any decisions as to the content of the final
standard. Following certification of the record, OSHA will review all
the evidence received into the record and will issue the final rule
based on the record as a whole.

Authority and Signature

    This document was prepared under the direction of James S.
Frederick, Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety
and Health, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20210. It is issued under the authority of sections 4,
6, and 8 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C.
653, 655, 657); 5 U.S.C. 553; section 304, Clean Air Act Amendments of
1990 (Pub. L. 101-549, reprinted at 29 U.S.C.A. 655 Note); section 41,
Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. 941); section
107, Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 3704);
section 1031, Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C.
4853); section 126, Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986, as amended (reprinted at 29 U.S.C.A. 655 Note); Secretary of
Labor's Order No. 8-2020 (85 FR 58383-94); and 29 CFR part 1911.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on May 12, 2021.
James S. Frederick,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2021-10523 Filed 5-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register: March 31, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 61)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 16022-16023]
[DOCID:fr31mr10-18]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0982; Directorate Identifier 2009-NE-19-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca S.A. MAKILA 1A and 1A1
Turboshaft Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as: The installation of TU250 CS boards, however, has
resulted in a few occurrences of erratic engine behaviour, in the form
of unexpected N1 variations and/or illumination of the ``GOV'' warning
light. The conclusions from an investigation by Turbom[eacute]ca are
that these malfunctions are due to a lapse of quality control in the
varnishing process applied to the boards, and that only boards in a
specific serial number range, as defined under ``Applicability'' and
referred to below as the ``suspect batch,'' are affected.
    We are proposing this AD to prevent loss of automatic engine
control during flight due to an uncommanded engine roll-back, which
could result in the inability to continue safe flight.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 30, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Contact Turbomeca, 40220 Tarnos, France; telephone 33 05 59 74 40
00; fax 33 05 59 74 45 15, for the service information identified in
this proposed AD.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
the same as the Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Dickert, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0982;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NE-19-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search
function of the Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any
of our dockets, including, if provided, the name of the individual who
sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65
FR 19477-78).

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2009-0090, dated April 28, 2009 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    The installation of TU250 CS boards, however, has resulted in a
few occurrences of erratic engine behaviour, in the form of
unexpected N1 variations and/or illumination of the ``GOV'' warning
light. The conclusions from an investigation by Turbomeca are that
these malfunctions are due to a lapse of quality control in the
varnishing process applied to the boards, and that only boards in a
specific serial number range, as defined under ``Applicability'' and
referred to below as the ``suspect batch,'' are affected.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Turbomeca S.A. has issued Mandatory Service Bulletins No. 298 73
0809, Version A, dated February 12, 2008; and No. 298 73 0810, Version
B, dated April 27, 2009. The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in
the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of France,
and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with France, they have notified us of the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI and service information referenced
above. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated

all information provided by EASA and determined the unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 10 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with this
proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $3,500 per product. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $35,850.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Turbomeca S.A.: Docket No. FAA-2009-0982; Directorate Identifier
2009-NE-19-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by April 30, 2010.

Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Turbomeca S.A. Makila 1A and 1A1
turboshaft engines with a comparator/selector (CS) board, part
number (P/N) 0 177 99 716 0, and a serial number (S/N) between 241EL
and 1192EL (inclusive) installed. These engines are installed on,
but not limited to, Eurocopter AS 332 C, AS 332 C1, AS 332 L, and AS
332 L1 helicopters.

Reason

    (d) The EASA AD 2009-0090, dated April 28, 2009, states that
this AD results from the following:
    (1) The installation of TU250 CS boards, however, has resulted
in a few occurrences of erratic engine behaviour, in the form of
unexpected N1 variations and/or illumination of the ``GOV'' warning
light. The conclusions from an investigation by Turbom[eacute]ca are
that these malfunctions are due to a lapse of quality control in the
varnishing process applied to the boards, and that only boards in a
specific serial number range, as defined under ``Applicability'' and
referred to below as the ``suspect batch'', are affected.
    (2) We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of automatic engine
control during flight due to an uncommanded engine roll-back, which
could result in the inability to continue safe flight.

Actions and Compliance

    (e) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Within 50 operating hours from the effective date of this
AD, replace any CS board, P/N 0 177 99 716 0, with an S/N from 241EL
to 1192EL (inclusive), that has fewer than 200 hours-since-new
(HSN). Use paragraph 2 of Turbomeca S.A. Mandatory Service Bulletin
(MSB) No. 298 73 0809 Version A, dated February 12, 2008, to replace
the boards.
    (2) During the next 500-hour inspection, replace any CS board,
P/N 0 177 99 716 0, with a S/N from 241EL to 1192EL (inclusive),
that has 200 HSN or more. Use paragraph 2 of Turbomeca S.A. MSB No.
298 73 0810 Version B, dated April 27, 2009, to replace the boards.

FAA AD Differences

    (f) This AD differs from the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information (MCAI) and/or service information as follows:
    (1) This AD requires replacing within 50 operating hours after
the effective date of this AD, all comparator/selector boards, P/N 0
177 99 716 0, with an S/N from 241EL to 1192EL (inclusive) that have
fewer than 200 HSN.
    (2) This AD requires replacing at the next 500-hour routine
inspection after the effective date of this AD, all comparator/
selector boards, P/N 0 177 99 716 0, with a S/N from 241EL to 1192EL
(inclusive) that have 200 HSN or more.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2009-0090, dated
April 28, 2009, and Turbomeca S.A. Mandatory Service Bulletins No.
298 73 0809, Version A, dated February 12, 2008; and No. 298 73
0810, Version B, dated April 27, 2009, for related information.
Contact Turbomeca, 40220 Tarnos, France; telephone 33 05 59 74 40
00; fax 33 05 59 74 45 15, for a copy of this service information.
    (i) Contact Kevin Dickert, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for more information about this AD.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on March 19, 2010.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 2010-7160 Filed 3-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 147 (Wednesday, August 2, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35888-35890]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15556]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2017-0417; Directorate Identifier 2017-CE-008-AD;
Amendment 39-18975; AD 2017-15-15]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; SOCATA Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2002-19-01 for
SOCATA Model TBM 700 airplanes. This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as the flight control wheel traveling beyond normal roll
control limits and jamming in a position that could cause loss of
control. We are issuing this AD to require actions to address the
unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective September 6, 2017.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of September 6,
2017.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain other publication listed in this AD as of
October 29, 2002 (67 FR 59137; September 20, 2002).

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0417; or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact SOCATA,
Direction des services, 65921 Tarbes Cedex 9, France; phone: +33 (0) 5
62 41 73 00; fax: +33 (0) 5 62 41 76 54; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet: https://www.mysocata.com/login/accueil.php. You may view this
referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is
also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for Docket No. FAA-2017-0417.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Albert Mercado, Aerospace Engineer,
901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816)
329-4119; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to SOCATA Model TBM 700
airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on May 8,
2017 (82 FR 21328), and proposed to supersede AD 2002-19-01, Amendment
39-12881 (67 FR 59137; September 20, 2002) (``AD 2002-19-01'').
    The NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products and was based on mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country. The MCAI states that:

    An event occurred in 2001 on an in-service aeroplane where,
during a pre-flight check of the flight controls, the pilot control
wheel jammed in full nose up and full left position after having
exceeded the control stop of roll.
    This condition, if not corrected, could lead to reduced control
of the aeroplane.
    Prompted by these findings, SOCATA issued Service Bulletin (SB)
70-095-27 to provide inspection instructions.
    To address this unsafe condition, DGAC France issued AD 2001-
582(A) to require repetitive inspections of the flight control
system after any maintenance operation on flight controls. That AD
was later revised to update the list of affected aeroplane MSN.
    Since DGAC France AD 2001-582(A) R1 was issued, SOCATA issued
Revision 2 of SB 70-095-27 to provide instructions for replacement
of the rivets in the roll primary stops as a terminating action for
the repetitive inspections.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD, which
supersedes DGAC France AD 2001-582(A) R1, requires replacement of
the rivets in the roll primary stops of the flight control wheels at
the next maintenance operation on flight controls.

The MCAI can be found in the AD docket on the Internet at: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FAA-2017-0417-0002.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR 51

    We reviewed DAHER SOCATA Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-095,
Revision 2, dated October 2016, which describes procedures for
replacement of the flight control wheel primary stop rivets. We also
reviewed EADS SOCATA Recommended Service Bulletin SB 70-114, dated
December 2004, which describes procedures for installation of roll
control emergency stops on the flight control wheel. This service
information is reasonably available because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section of the AD.

Differences Between This AD and the Service Information

    DAHER SOCATA Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-095, Revision 2,
dated

October 2016, requires a modification that terminates any repetitive
inspections and also gives credit for another modification that may
have previously been done. We are retaining the repetitive inspection
requirement from AD 2002-19-01 and allowing installation of one of the
two different modifications as terminating action for the repetitive
inspections.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 203 products of U.S. registry.
    We estimate that it will take about 1 hour per product to comply
with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate is $85
per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the
inspection on U.S. operators to be $17,255, or $85 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions will
take about 3 work-hours per product. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this action
on U.S. operators to be $255 per product. We have no way of determining
the number of products that may need these actions.
    For the optional actions to terminate the repetitive inspections,
we estimate the following costs. We have no way of determining how many
operators may choose to do either of the optional actions. For
replacement of the rivets in the roll primary stops, we estimate that
it will take about 3.5 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Required parts would cost about $10 per product. Based on these
figures, for replacement of the rivets we estimate the cost of this
action on U.S. operators to be $307.50 per product.
    For the installation of a roll control emergency stop on each
control wheel, we estimate that it will take about 19.5 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $1,650
per product. Based on these figures, for installation of the roll
control emergency stop, we estimate the cost of this action on U.S.
operators to be $3,307.50 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0417; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received,
and other information. The street address for the Docket Office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-12881 (67 FR
59137; September 20, 2002) and adding the following new AD:

2017-15-15 SOCATA: Amendment 39-18975; Docket No. FAA-2017-0417;
Directorate Identifier 2017-CE-008-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective September 6,
2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD supersedes AD 2002-19-01, Amendment 39-12881 (67 FR
59137, September 20, 2002) (``AD 2002-19-01'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to SOCATA Model TBM 700 airplanes, serial
numbers 1 through 184, 186, 187, 189 through 204, 206, and 207,
certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 27: Flight
Controls.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as the flight
control wheel traveling beyond normal roll control limits. We are
issuing this AD to prevent the flight control wheel from becoming
jammed and leading to reduced or loss of control.

(f) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the actions in paragraphs (f)(1) and (2)
of this AD or paragraph (f)(3) of this AD:
    (1) Within the next 100 hours time-in-service (TIS) after
October 29, 2002 (the effective date retained from AD 2002-19-01)
and repetitively thereafter every time the flight control system
undergoes maintenance, perform a test of the pilot and right-hand
(RH) station control wheels to determine if either control wheel
becomes jammed following SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin (SB) 70-095 27, dated November 2001.
    (2) If any jamming is found during any test required by
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, before further flight, adjust the roll
control stops on either the pilot control wheel or the RH station
control wheel following SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory SB 70-095 27,
dated November 2001.
    (3) To terminate the repetitive inspections required in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD either of the following actions may be
done:
    (i) Replace the rivets in the roll primary stops of both control
wheels following the

Accomplishment Instructions in DAHER SOCATA Mandatory SB 70-095,
Revision 2, dated October 2016; or
    (ii) Install a roll control emergency stop on each control wheel
following the Accomplishment Instructions of EADS SOCATA Recommended
SB 70-114, dated December 2004.

(g) Credit for Actions Done Following Previous Service Information

    If done before September 6, 2017 (the effective date of this
AD), this AD allows credit for replacement of the roll primary stop
rivets on an airplane as specified in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this AD
following the Accomplishment Instructions of SOCATA TBM Mandatory SB
70-095, original issue or revision 1.

(h) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Albert Mercado, Aerospace Engineer, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards
District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(i) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI EASA AD No.: 2017-0018, dated February 3, 2017.
The MCAI can be found in the AD docket on the Internet at: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FAA-2017-0417-0002.

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
September 6, 2017 (the effective date of this AD).
    (i) DAHER SOCATA Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-095, Revision
2, dated October 2016.
    (ii) EADS SOCATA Recommended Service Bulletin SB 70-114, dated
December 2004.
    (4) The following service information was approved for IBR on
October 29, 2002 (67 FR 59137, September 20, 2002).
    (i) SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory SB 70-095 27, dated November
2001.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (5) For SOCATA service information identified in this AD,
contact SOCATA, Direction des services, 65921 Tarbes Cedex 9,
France; phone: +33 (0) 5 62 41 73 00; fax: +33 (0) 5 62 41 76 54;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: https://www.mysocata.com/login/accueil.php.
    (6) You may view this service information at FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
816-329-4148. In addition, you can access this service information
on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2017-0417.
    (7) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on July 19, 2017.
Melvin Johnson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-15556 Filed 8-1-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 77578]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32031]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

In the Matter of: Brendan Technologies, Inc., CenterStaging
Corp., PGMI, Inc., Thermal Energy Storage, Inc., and Trinity3
Corporation; Order of Suspension of Trading

 December 9, 2011.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Brendan Technologies, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended March 31, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
CenterStaging Corp. because it has not filed any periodic reports since
the period ended September 30, 2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
PGMI, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the
period ended December 31, 2006.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Thermal Energy Storage, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended March 31, 2005.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Trinity3 Corporation because it has not filed any periodic reports
since the period ended September 30, 2006.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered,
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that
trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended
for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST on December 9, 2011, through 11:59
p.m. EST on December 22, 2011.

    By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-32031 Filed 12-9-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38864-38865]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15942]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 17a-11, SEC File No. 270-94, OMB Control No. 3235-0085.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a
request for approval of extension of the previously approved collection
of information provided for in Rule 17a-11 (17 CFR 240.17a-11) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (``Exchange
Act'').
    In response to an operational crisis in the securities industry
between 1967 and 1970, the Commission adopted Rule 17a-11 under the
Exchange Act on July 11, 1971. Rule 17a-11 requires broker-dealers that
are experiencing financial or operational difficulties to provide
notice to the Commission, the broker-dealer's designated examining
authority (``DEA''), and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(``CFTC'') if the broker-dealer is registered with the CFTC as a
futures commission merchant. Rule 17a-11 is an integral part of the
Commission's financial responsibility program which enables the
Commission, a broker-dealer's DEA, and the CFTC to increase
surveillance of a broker-dealer experiencing difficulties and to obtain
any additional information necessary to gauge the broker-dealer's
financial or operational condition.
    Rule 17a-11 also requires over-the-counter (``OTC'') derivatives
dealers and broker-dealers that are permitted to compute net capital
pursuant to Appendix E to Exchange Act Rule 15c3-1 to notify the
Commission when their tentative net capital drops below certain levels.
OTC derivatives dealers must also provide notice to the Commission of
backtesting exceptions identified pursuant to Appendix F of Rule 15c3-1
(17 CFR 240.15c3-1f).
    Compliance with the Rule is mandatory. The Commission will
generally not publish or make available to any person notices or
reports received pursuant to Rule 17a-11. The

Commission believes that information obtained under Rule 17a-11 relates
to a condition report prepared for the use of the Commission, other
federal governmental authorities, and securities industry self-
regulatory organizations responsible for the regulation or supervision
of financial institutions.
    Only broker-dealers whose capital declines below certain specified
levels or who are otherwise experiencing financial or operational
problems have a reporting burden under Rule 17a-11. In 2011, the
Commission received 465 notices under this Rule, including one notice
from an OTC derivatives dealer permitted to compute net capital
pursuant to Appendix E to Exchange Act Rule 15c3-1.
    Each broker-dealer reporting pursuant to Rule 17a-11 will spend
approximately one hour preparing and transmitting the notice required
by the Rule. Accordingly, the total estimated annualized burden under
Rule 17a-11 is 465 hours.
    The Commission may not conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No
person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a
collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a
valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information
collection at the following Web site, www.reginfo.gov. Comments should
be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503 or by sending an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Thomas Bayer, Director/Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon,
6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted within 30 days of this
notice.

    Dated: June 25, 2012.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-15942 Filed 6-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: May 4, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 85)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 23577-23579]
[DOCID:fr04my10-7]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0463; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-021-AD;
Amendment 39-16280; AD 2010-10-01]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; GA 8 Airvan (Pty) Ltd Models GA8 and
GA8-TC320 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above that will supersede an existing AD. This AD
results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by the aviation authority of another country to identify and
correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes
the unsafe condition as:

    Inspection of a high time aircraft has revealed cracks in the
Horizontal Stabiliser rear spar splice plate and inboard main ribs
around the area of the Horizontal Stabiliser rear pivot attachment.
Additionally, failure of some attach bolts in service may be due to
improper assembly.
    This amendment is issued to clarify the model applicability.
    The previous amendment was issued because the requirement
document now contains an inspection for cracking in horizontal
stabilisers which have load transferring fittings installed.

This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: This AD becomes effective May 10, 2010.
    As of March 2, 2009 (74 FR 8159; February 24, 2009), the Director
of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of
Gippsland Aeronautics Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA8-2002-02, Issue
5, dated November 13, 2008, listed in this AD.
    We must receive comments on this AD by June 18, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-
4059; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    On February 17, 2009, we issued AD 2009-05-01, Amendment 39-15825
(74 FR 8159; February 24, 2009). That AD required actions intended to
address an unsafe condition on Model GA8 airplanes.
    Since we issued AD 2009-05-01, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority
(CASA), which is the aviation authority for Australia, has issued AD/
GA8/5, Amdt 3, dated April 9, 2010 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
Australian AD clarifies the applicability of the AD to include Model
GA8-TC320 airplanes. Model GA8-TC320 airplanes have the same tailplane
configuration as Model GA8 airplanes. The MCAI states:

    Inspection of a high time aircraft has revealed cracks in the
Horizontal Stabiliser rear spar splice plate and inboard main ribs
around the area of the Horizontal Stabiliser rear pivot attachment.
Additionally, failure of some attach bolts in service may be due to
improper assembly.
    This amendment is issued to clarify the model applicability.
    The previous amendment was issued because the requirement
document now contains an inspection for cracking in horizontal
stabilisers which have load transferring fittings installed.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Gippsland Aeronautics has issued Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA8-
2002-02, Issue 5, dated November 13, 2008. The actions described in
this service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all information provided by the State of Design Authority and
determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might have also required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
described in a separate paragraph of the AD. These requirements take
precedence over those copied from the MCAI.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because of
potential cracking of the horizontal stabilizer structure, which could
lead to failure of the tailplane assembly. Therefore, we determined
that notice and opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD
are impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment
effective in fewer than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD.

Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section.
Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0463; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-021-
AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments
on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects
of this AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date
and may amend this AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-15825 (74 FR
8159; February 24, 2009), and adding the following new AD:

2010-10-01 GA 8 Airvan (Pty) Ltd: Amendment 39-16280; Docket No.
FAA-2010-0463; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-021-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective May 10,
2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2009-05-01, Amendment 39-15825.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to the following model and serial number
airplanes, certificated in any category:
    (i) Group 1 Airplanes (retains the actions and applicability
from AD 2009-05-01): Model GA8 airplanes, serial numbers GA8-00-004
and up; and
    (ii) Group 2 Airplanes: Model GA8-TC320 airplanes, all serial
numbers.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 55:
Stabilizers.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    Inspection of a high time aircraft has revealed cracks in the
Horizontal Stabiliser rear spar splice plate and inboard main ribs
around the area of the Horizontal Stabiliser rear pivot attachment.
Additionally, failure of some attach bolts in service may be due to
improper assembly.
    This amendment is issued to clarify the model applicability.
    The previous amendment was issued because the requirement
document now contains an inspection for cracking in horizontal
stabilisers which have load transferring fittings installed.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) For Group 1 Airplanes: Unless already done, do the following
actions:
    (1) Within the next 10 hours time-in-service (TIS) after March
2, 2009 (the effective date of AD 2009-05-01):
    (i) For all aircraft not incorporating computer numeric control
(CNC) machined elevator hinges, inspect and repair the left and
right horizontal stabilizer rear pivot attachment installation
following instruction ``3. Rear Pivot Attachment Inspection,'' of
Gippsland Aeronautics Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA8-2002-02,
Issue 5, dated November 13, 2008; and,
    (ii) For all aircraft, inspect the left and right rear attach
bolt mating surfaces for damage or an out of square condition and
replace the left and right rear attach bolts following instruction
``5. Rear Attach Bolt Replacement,'' of Gippsland Aeronautics
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA8-2002-02, Issue 5, dated November
13, 2008. Reworking the mating surfaces by spotfacing is no longer
acceptable. If the mating surfaces are damaged, not square, or were
previously reworked by spotfacing the surface, replace the parts as
specified in Gippsland Aeronautics Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-
GA8-2002-02, Issue 5, dated November 13, 2008.
    (2) Within the next 10 hours TIS after March 2, 2009 (the
effective date of AD 2009-05-01) and repetitively thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 100 hours TIS or 12 months, whichever occurs
first, for all aircraft:
    (i) Inspect the horizontal stabilizer externally following
instruction ``2. External Inspection (Lower flange, Stabilizer rear
spar),'' of Gippsland Aeronautics Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA8-
2002-02, Issue 5, dated November 13, 2008; and
    (ii) Inspect the horizontal stabilizer internally following
instruction ``4. Internal Inspection,'' of Gippsland Aeronautics
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA8-2002-02, Issue 5, dated November
13, 2008.
    (3) If during the inspection required by paragraph (f)(2) of
this AD any excessive local deflection or movement of the lower skin
surrounding the lower pivot attachment, cracking, or working (loose)
rivet is found, before further flight, obtain an FAA-approved repair
scheme from the manufacturer and incorporate this repair scheme. Due
to FAA policy, the repair scheme for crack damage must include an
immediate repair of the crack, not a repetitive inspection.
Continued operational flight with un-repaired crack damage is not
permitted.
    (g) For Group 2 Airplanes: Unless already done, do the following
actions:
    (1) Within the next 10 hours TIS after May 10, 2010 (the
effective date of this AD):
    (i) For all aircraft not incorporating computer numeric control
(CNC) machined elevator hinges, inspect and repair the left and
right horizontal stabilizer rear pivot attachment installation
following instruction ``3. Rear Pivot Attachment Inspection,'' of
Gippsland Aeronautics Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA8-2002-02,
Issue 5, dated November 13, 2008; and,
    (ii) For all aircraft, inspect the left and right rear attach
bolt mating surfaces for damage or an out of square condition and
replace the

left and right rear attach bolts following instruction ``5. Rear
Attach Bolt Replacement,'' of Gippsland Aeronautics Mandatory
Service Bulletin SB-GA8-2002-02, Issue 5, dated November 13, 2008.
Reworking the mating surfaces by spotfacing is no longer acceptable.
If the mating surfaces are damaged, not square, or were previously
reworked by spotfacing the surface, before further flight, replace
the parts as specified in Gippsland Aeronautics Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB-GA8-2002-02, Issue 5, dated November 13, 2008.
    (2) Within the next 10 hours TIS after May 10, 2010 (the
effective date of this AD) and repetitively thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 100 hours TIS or 12 months, whichever occurs first,
for all aircraft:
    (i) Inspect the horizontal stabilizer externally following
instruction ``2. External Inspection (Lower flange, Stabilizer rear
spar),'' of Gippsland Aeronautics Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA8-
2002-02, Issue 5, dated November 13, 2008; and
    (ii) Inspect the horizontal stabilizer internally following
instruction ``4. Internal Inspection,'' of Gippsland Aeronautics
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA8-2002-02, Issue 5, dated November
13, 2008.
    (3) If during the inspection required by paragraph (g)(2) of
this AD any excessive local deflection or movement of the lower skin
surrounding the lower pivot attachment, cracking, or working (loose)
rivet is found, before further flight, obtain an FAA-approved repair
scheme from the manufacturer and incorporate this repair scheme. Due
to FAA policy, the repair scheme for crack damage must include an
immediate repair of the crack, not a repetitive inspection.
Continued operational flight with un-repaired crack damage is not
permitted.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows:
    (1) ``Requirement: 1. Daily Inspection (Stabilizer attach
bolt)'' of the service information requires a daily inspection of
the stabilizer attach bolt. The daily inspection is not a
requirement of this AD. Instead of the daily inspection, we require
you to perform, within 10 hours TIS, ``Requirement 3. Rear Pivot
Attachment Inspection'' and ``Requirement 5. Rear Attachment Bolt
Replacement'' of the service information. Compliance with
requirement 3. and 5. is a terminating action for the daily
inspection, and we are requiring these within 10 hours TIS after the
effective date of this AD.
    (2) ``Requirement: 2. External Inspection (Lower flange,
Stabilizer rear spar)'' of the service information does not specify
any action if excessive local deflection or movement of lower skin,
cracking, or working (loose) rivet is found. We require obtaining
and incorporating an FAA-approved repair scheme from the
manufacturer before further flight.
    (3) The MCAI does not state if further flight with known cracks
is allowed. FAA policy is to not allow further flight with known
cracks in critical structure. We require that if any cracks are
found when accomplishing the inspection required in paragraphs
(f)(2) and (g)(2) of this AD, you must repair the cracks before
further flight.
    (4) The service information does not state that parts with
spotfaced nut and bolt mating surfaces require replacement. However,
the service information no longer allows reworking of the mating
surfaces by spotfacing. We require that if any nut and bolt surfaces
were previously reworked by spotfacing, you must replace the parts.
    (5) The service information has not been revised to include
Model GA8-TC320 airplanes; however, the procedures still apply to
this model, and actions must be done following the service
information.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (h) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (i) Refer to MCAI Civil Aviation Safety Authority AD No. AD/GA8/
5, Amdt 3, dated April 9, 2010; and Gippsland Aeronautics Mandatory
Service Bulletin SB-GA8-2002-02, Issue 5, dated November 13, 2008,
for related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (j) You must use Gippsland Aeronautics Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB-GA8-2002-02, Issue 5, dated November 13, 2008, to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) On March 2, 2009 (74 FR 8159; February 24, 2009), the
Director of the Federal Register previously approved the
incorporation by reference of Gippsland Aeronautics Mandatory
Service Bulletin SB-GA8-2002-02, Issue 5, dated November 13, 2008.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Gippsland Aeronautics, Attn: Technical Services, P.O. Box 881,
Morwell Victoria 3840, Australia; telephone: + 61 03 5172 1200; fax:
+61 03 5172 1201; Internet: http://www.gippsaero.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the FAA, Central Region,
Office of the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the
Central Region, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on April 20, 2010.
Steven W. Thompson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-10220 Filed 5-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P