[Federal Register: January 28, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 18)]
[Notices]
[Page 4550-4551]
[DOCID:fr28ja10-45]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AC10-23-000]

Empire Pipeline, Inc.; Notice of Filing

January 21, 2010.
    Take notice that on December 1, 2009, Empire Pipeline, Inc.
submitted a request for a waiver of the reporting requirement to
provide its certified public accountant (CPA) certification statement
for the FERC Form No. 2 for 2009 on the basis of the calendar year
ending December 31, 2009, because it utilizes a fiscal year ending
September 30, 2009.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice
of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: February 18, 2010.

Kimberly Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-1671 Filed 1-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25394-25395]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10856]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-64358; File No. SR-CHX-2011-03]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Alter the CHX Fee Schedule Relating to the CHX Connect Service

April 28, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on April 26, 2011, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. CHX has
filed the proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective
upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The CHX proposes to amend its Schedule of Participant Fees and
Assessments (the ``Fee Schedule''), effective April 26, 2011, to alter
its schedule of fees for Participants relating to its CHX Connect
service. The text of this proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Web site at http://www.chx.com/rules/proposed_rules.htm, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC, 20549.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the CHX included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule changes and
discussed any comments it received regarding the proposal. The text of
these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV
below. The CHX has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C
below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Through this filing, the Exchange is proposing to alter its
schedule of fees charged to Participants for receiving orders through
its CHX Connect service. CHX Connect is a communications service owned
and operated by the Exchange which allows users to transmit orders and
related transaction information directly to any destination (such as an
over-the-counter market maker or order-routing vendor) connected to the
service without being submitted to the Exchange's trading facilities.
As an alternative to private order routing systems or vendors, users
may also elect to use CHX Connect to transmit orders to the Exchange's
Matching System and to CHX-registered Institutional Brokers.
    Currently, the Fee Schedule provides for a $5,000 monthly base fee
for Participants that receive orders through CHX Connect, as well as
additional charges and credits based upon the number of shares that are
processed by CHX Connect during the month. The Exchange proposes to
simplify this structure by eliminating the additional charges and
credits and limiting the fee charged to Participants that receive
orders through CHX Connect to a flat $5,000 monthly amount. This
proposed change will not raise fees on any Participant and, in some
cases, will reduce the fees charged to Participants that receive orders
through CHX Connect. The Exchange believes that these changes will
equitably allocate fees for the CHX Connect service among its
Participants by charging all Participants that receive orders through
CHX Connect the same base amount.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act \5\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \6\ in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among members and other persons using any facility or
system which the Exchange operates or controls. Among other things,
this change to the fee schedule would equitably allocate the fee for
the CHX Connect service among Participants that receive orders through
CHX Connect by charging all such Participants the same base amount.
This proposed change will not raise fees on any Participant and, in
some cases, will reduce the fees charged to Participants that receive
orders through CHX Connect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments Regarding the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \7\ and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder \8\ because it establishes or changes a due, fee or other
charge applicable to the Exchange's members and non-members, which
renders the proposed rule change effective upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CHX-2011-03 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CHX-2011-03. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CHX-2011-03 and should be
submitted on or before May 25, 2011.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-10856 Filed 5-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Metro Nashville Airport Authority ( Addendum) NPDES Permit No. TN0064041 Page No. A 1 of A 7 ADDENDUM TO RATIONALE Metro Nashville Airport Authority PERMIT NO. TN0064041 September 18, 2003 Addendum prepared by: Mr. Vojin Janjic The Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority ( MNAA) existing individual NPDES permit required MNAA to perform a Waste Load Allocation ( WLA) study. The purpose of the study is to determine the impact on water quality and to set permit limits for the discharge from the treatment facility which discharges to Sims Branch via Outfall 002.

The existing permit required that the overall completion date of June 1, 2003 for the WLA study must be met, regardless of what changes may become necessary in the details and interim reporting dates. After several revisions of the draft study were made according to division's recommendations, the final version was submitted in a timely manner, on May 30, 2003. The significance to meet this compliance date was to allow for sufficient time for this permit to be modified prior to the 2003/ 2004 deicing season. The purpose of this addendum to rationale is to summarize changes in effluent limitations and monitoring requirements at Outfall 002, based on the findings of the WLA study. The effluent limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions for all other outfalls, as described in the NPDES Permit TN0064041, will remain unchanged.

Several stream characterization samples were collected as part of the Sims Branch WLA. The characterization sampling was performed during the different seasons of the year to provide data applicable to each season. Seasonal sampling was a key to this study because of the nature of discharge from MNAA. Deicing only occurs in the colder months of the year. For this reason, samples were collected and analyzed according to the typical bounds of the deicing season. A seven month period represents the potential months when deicing may occur. This period, the Winter Period, includes October through April of each year. These months also correspond to the wetter months of the year, thus providing additional assimilative capacity to deal with the discharged treated flow from Outfall 002. The remaining period of the year, the Summer Period, includes May through September. This period does not see any deicing activity. Additionally, flows are lower in Sims Branch, and since temperatures are higher, dissolved oxygen ( DO) is lower. Therefore, this period of the year is considered separately. Each of these seasons is reflected in sampling schemes, data analysis, and permit limits.

The Winter Event was performed on December 28 29, 2001. This was the first of the two extensive sampling efforts performed as part of the WLA. This twoday period is within two weeks of the midpoint of the winter period. The data obtained from the event provided a good characterization of the typical conditions during a Winter Period discharge from Outfall 002. 2.53 14.03 5.78 8.64 3.72 3.28 4.14 2.69 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 DISTANCE FROM CONFLUENCE WITH MILL CREEK ( MI) CBOD ( mg/ L) JB2 JB4 JB6 JB14 JB8 JB10 JB11 JB12 TRIB 5 TRIB 6 TRIB 4 STEP AERATOR EFF.

Ultimate CBOD concentrations for the Winter Event. Metro Nashville Airport Authority ( Addendum) NPDES Permit No. TN0064041 Page No. A 2 of A 7 The Summer Event was performed on July 8 9, 2002. This was the second of the two extensive sampling efforts performed as part of the WLA. This two day period is within a few days of the midpoint of the summer period. The data from this event characterizes the discharge from Outfall 002 during the warmer months of the year.

In addition to the Winter Event and Summer Event, environmental quality samples were also collected during several one day sampling events. The sampling was much less extensive and did not include ultimate carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand ( CBODu) sampling as was included during the extensive Winter and Summer Events. Also, additional time of travel sampling was not performed. However, the data that was obtained during these events did provide sufficient information for a model validation scenario.

Once the field investigations and sampling events were complete, all relevant data available was gathered, and the task of organization and analysis was performed. The data was then used to develop and calibrate a model of Sims Branch. The model selected to perform the WLA study was the Qual2E model developed by the U. S. EPA. This model requires many types of data inputs to perform acceptable model runs. Although it is possible to perform model runs using default values, data developed through a study such as this one will result in a better and more reliable water quality model. Therefore, strict attention was given to an accurate assessment of all available data to improve the output from the Qual2E model runs.

The extensive environmental data collected during sampling events was analyzed and used to develop and calibrate the Qual2E model. The development and calibration of the Qual2E model was performed based on the period of the year to be evaluated. Each calibration was based on the major sampling event performed for each period of the year. The Winter Event ( December 28 29, 2001) was used as the base scenario for the Winter Period ( October   April). Likewise, the Summer Event ( July 8 9, 2002) was used as the base scenario for the Summer Period ( May   September).

Several conservative measures have been employed in the development of this model. Some noteworthy conservative aspects of the calibrated model for scenario assessment include:   A wide range of headwaters flow conditions is used to perform the scenarios;   The 75 th percentile flow was used for the discharge flow, even during very low flow headwaters conditions;   The outlying period for the Winter Period was April 30 ( deicing activity typically is over before April of every year); and   One half the diurnal flow variation was used for comparison of model results to the water quality standard ( 5.5 mg/ L versus the 5.0 mg/ L WQS). The conservative approach provided sufficient safety factors toward developing appropriate permit limits for the Outfall 002 discharge; however, some aspects of a worst case scenario should still be 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 DISTANCE FRO CONFLUENCE WITH MILL CREEK ( MI) CBOD ( mg/ L)

model actual JB2 JB4 JB6 JB14 JB8 JB10 JB11 JB12 TRIB 5 TRIB 6 TRIB 4 STEP AERATOR EFF.

Winter Event CBODu Actual versus Model Metro Nashville Airport Authority ( Addendum) NPDES Permit No. TN0064041 Page No. A 3 of A 7 evaluated. This was accomplished by performing scenarios for the outlying limits of the seven month and five month periods to evaluate the potential impact.

The ultimate purpose of this study is to provide a basis for recommending appropriate discharge limits for the MNAA Outfall 002. The flow of Outfall 002 represents the treated stormwater discharge from the main terminal and ramp areas of the Nashville International Airport property. The stormwater discharge includes flows from deicing activities during the winter months of the year.

There is always some element of BOD contained in airport discharge. However, levels remain very low during the Summer Period of the year. The major source of BOD in airport runoff is deicing fluid. Deicing only takes place during the cold periods of the year; the period is almost exclusively bound between the months of October and April of the year. Consequently, the limits recommended by this report are relevant to this timeframe. Limits are recommended for the period between October and April, and separate limits are recommended for the period between May and September. These are the same periods proposed by the division's personnel during the last permit review.

It is important to note the extensive range of variables that affect the impact of any pollutant source on a receiving stream. The discharge from Outfall 002 is a classic example. For any particular discharge flow, there is an associated CBOD concentration. This particular flow and concentration could have a range of impacts on the water quality of Sims Branch. Factors that influence these impacts include: weather conditions, air temperature, water temperatures ( Sims Branch and effluent), pre existing dissolved oxygen concentrations ( Sims Branch and effluent), pre existing CBOD concentrations in Sims Branch, and background flow of Sims Branch. It would be preferable to develop a matrix or a real time model as part of the discharge permit; however, this is not currently practical for the State of Tennessee or MNAA because of insufficient staff and resources. Such a concept is also limited because of the required time to evaluate CBOD levels in stream as well as in the Outfall 002 discharge. If future advancements are made in water quality sampling and analysis practices and the additional staff to perform such an evaluation were available, such a standard would provide a much more real time management of the water quality of Sims Branch.

The Winter Period recommendations are based on, a) model runs that show no DO concentration that dips below the water quality standard along the entire length of Sims Branch, and b) the evaluation of the technological capability of the treatment unit. The technological evaluation demonstrated that under certain influent conditions, even a 92% reduction of CBOD5 would yield concentrations in excess of 250 mg/ L. However, these conditions typically occur when flows are lower in Sims Branch and in the treatment unit. The critical period for CBOD5 concentrations is found when a great deal of deicing is required and relatively low rainfall or snow melt totals are available to carry the deicing fluids. Therefore, the major concern is during cold, dryer periods of the winter. When these periods occur and high influent concentrations are detected, flow into the treatment unit can be stopped and flows can be retained until additional stormwater is available for dilution and treatment. This option was exercised in December 2002. If the capacities of the treatment unit and retention ponds are exceeded when a high concentration is measured in the influent of the treatment pond, flow can be diverted to the Metro sanitary sewer collection system. This addresses the critical time for CBOD5 concentrations.

The limits for higher flow periods are not problematic for the treatment unit because of the available dilution from stormwater. The permittee recommended the highest concentration allowed during the winter months to be 150 mg/ L for a single sample for any flow of 3 cfs or greater. This recommendation was based on model runs with the stream flow set at 3 cfs with a discharge concentration of 150 mg/ L. Although higher concentrations may be assimilated by Sims Branch at Metro Nashville Airport Authority ( Addendum) NPDES Permit No. TN0064041 Page No. A 4 of A 7 higher flows, concentrations are not critical at these higher flow conditions and the recommended 150 mg/ L concentration will further contribute to the protection of the health of Sims Branch.

The discharge permit limits recommended by the permittee for the Winter Period are presented in Table A. One sample was recommended per week during the Winter Period of the year because it is the critical period of the year for elevated CBOD concentrations in the discharge from Outfall 002.

Table A Permittee Recommended Water Quality Based Effluent Limits for the Winter Period ( October   April)

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS MONTHLY DAILY MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Receiving Stream Flow > 0 CFS and < 0.5 CFS CBOD5 25 30 1/ Week Grab Receiving Stream Flow > 0.5 CFS and < 1 CFS CBOD5 45 50 1/ Week Grab Receiving Stream Flow > 1 CFS and < 3 CFS CBOD5 65 75 1/ Week Grab Receiving Stream Flow > 3 CFS CBOD5 135 150 1/ Week Grab The WLA allocation study, as indicated above, showed that relatively high concentrations of CBOD5 can be discharged into Sims branch during winter months without violating the instream water quality criteria. However, it is division's position that the entire assimilative capacity of a receiving stream should not be allocated to one source, particularly when the receiving stream segment ( Sims Branch, ID TN05130202007_ 0150) is impaired for " Organic enrichment/ Low DO." Furthermore, most surface water discharges must provide a minimum degree of treatment. For industries subject to a federal Effluent Limitation Guideline( s), the guideline will provide the minimum degree of treatment. In the absence of federal guidelines, Tennessee Rule 1200 4 5. 03: Effluent Limitations for Effluent Limited Segments states, in part:

"[ ] treatment units will be required to achieve as a minimum the following as maximum effluent limitations when such parameters are present as a result of processes causing the contamination or discharges:

( 1) Municipal and domestic wastewater treatment plants Monthly Weekly Daily Parameter Avg. ( mg/ l) Avg. ( mg/ 1) Max. ( mg/ 1)

BOD5 30 40 45 TSS 30 40 45 Metro Nashville Airport Authority ( Addendum) NPDES Permit No. TN0064041 Page No. A 5 of A 7 ( 2) Industrial wastewater treatment plants Parameter Daily Maximum Concentrations ( mg/ l) Oil and Grease ( a) 30 ( b) No visible or floating oil or grease pH ( 6.0 to 9.0) * Suspended Solids 40 Settleable solids 0.5 ml/ l * In the case of biological treatment units, the daily maximum TSS may be 120 mg/ l.

The nature of the MNAA's treatment system and/ or effluent can not be classified in neither of the two above listed categories. However, these tables were included in this addendum to rationale to illustrate that technology based limits, as well as results of treatability studies, can be used in establishing effluent limitations for point source discharges. During the last two permit terms, the division requested monitoring of untreated and treated wastewater in order to evaluate efficiency of the wastewater treatment system. A comprehensive table with efficiency analysis is attached at the end of this addendum to rationale. Outfall 02A depicts CBOD5 concentrations in untreated, while Outfall 002 represents CBOD5 concentrations in treated wastewater.

In the permit writer's BPJ, a subset of this data should be used to better represent treatment efficiency during winter, and under CBOD5 loading originating from deicing activities. It was difficult to ascertain incoming CBOD5 concentrations that positively correspond to application of deicing fluids. Instead, measurements not likely to be associated with deicing activities were excluded from the data set.

It should be noted that exclusion of relatively low incoming concentrations of CBOD5 (< 100 mg/ L) did not significantly change treatment system efficiency from the concentration or loading aspect. However, the resulting average concentrations of treated wastewater were increased. This, in the permit writer's BPJ, more accurately represents wastewater treatment performance under full pollutant load in winter period. Table B presents the recommended discharge permit limits for the 92% 83%

Date 02A Maximum Concentration 002 Maximum Concentration efficiency efficiency 02A Maximum FLOW 02A Loading 002 Maximum FLOW 002 Loading mg/ L mg/ L mg/ L mg/ L MGD lb/ day MGD lb/ day 09/ 30/ 1996 524 14 42 86 0.50 2203 0.69 80 02/ 28/ 1997 190 58 15 31 0.50 799 0.24 114 01/ 31/ 1998 340 92 28 56 0.62 1755 0.98 749 02/ 28/ 1998 590 98 48 97 0.47 2308 0.97 789 03/ 31/ 1998 340 53 28 56 0.47 1330 1.52 672 04/ 30/ 1998 220 12 18 36 0.47 861 0.72 72 12/ 31/ 1998 3090 9 251 510 0.01 258 1.10 82 01/ 31/ 1999 1520 360 123 251 0.49 6212 1.15 3447 02/ 28/ 1999 133 14 11 22 0.51 561 0.57 66 11/ 30/ 1999 109 2 9 18 0.49 443 1.30 22 12/ 31/ 2000 1100 25 89 182 0.59 5413 0.50 104 01/ 31/ 2001 3110 104 252 513 0.44 11516 0.01 10 02/ 28/ 2001 488 21 40 81 0.49 2006 0.53 92 12/ 04/ 2002 1560 18 126 257 0.33 4293 0.04 6 02/ 13/ 2003 439 55 36 72 0.34 1248 0.34 156 02/ 21/ 2003 176 42 14 29 0.43 630 0.43 150 02/ 28/ 2003 318 142 26 52 0.41 1098 0.41 490 03/ 07/ 2003 528 80 43 87 0.24 1039 0.24 157 03/ 14/ 2003 249 19 20 41 0.02 31 0.02 2 Average 791 64 64 131 0.41 2316 0.62 382 92% Efficiency 83% Load eff. Metro Nashville Airport Authority ( Addendum) NPDES Permit No. TN0064041 Page No. A 6 of A 7 Winter Period. The proposed daily maximum limitations were derived from monthly average limitations, using the ratio from Tennessee Rule 1200 4 5. 03 ( 30: 45 mg/ L, see table above), and based on established division practice applied to various biological wastewater treatment plants across the state.

Table B Recommended Effluent Limits for the Winter Period ( October   April)

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS MONTHLY DAILY MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Receiving Stream Flow > 0 CFS and < 0.5 CFS CBOD5 25 38 1/ Week Grab Receiving Stream Flow > 0.5 CFS and < 1 CFS CBOD5 45 68 1/ Week Grab Receiving Stream Flow > 1 CFS and < 3 CFS CBOD5 65 98 1/ Week Grab Receiving Stream Flow > 3 CFS CBOD5 65 Report 1/ Week Grab Only one sample per month is recommended during the Summer Period as no deicing activity typically occurs during the Summer Period. However, the limits recommended for the Summer Period are much lower than those for the Winter Period. This is recommended because of the typically lower flows, higher air and water temperatures, and thus lower in stream DO concentrations found during the summer months. It is recommended that MNAA make every effort to prevent discharge when the flow of Sims Branch is below 0.5 cfs. However, permit limits are recommended to accommodate a situation requiring discharge during such a flow scenario.

MNAA does not have any significant source of BOD other than deicing activities, which only occur during the colder months of the year. Therefore, it is recommended that MNAA only be required to report concentrations when discharges occur when stream flows are above 1.5 cfs during the Summer Period. Table C presents the recommended discharge permit limits for the Summer Period.

Table C: Recommended Effluent Limits for the Summer Period ( May   October)

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS MONTHLY DAILY MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Receiving Stream Flow > 0 CFS and < 0.5 CFS* CBOD5 3 4.5 1/ Month Grab Receiving Stream Flow > 0.5 CFS and < 1 CFS CBOD5 6 9 1/ Month Grab Receiving Stream Flow > 1 CFS and < 1.5 CFS CBOD5 12 18 1/ Month Grab Receiving Stream Flow > 1.5 CFS CBOD5 Report Report 1/ Month Grab * Note: Permittee should make every effort to prevent discharge when the flow of Sims Branch is below 0.5 cfs. However, if discharge is necessary, these limits apply.

The WLA study has resulted in a calibrated model of Sims Branch capable of appropriately assessing the impact of the Outfall 002 discharge on the environment. The result is proposed permit Metro Nashville Airport Authority ( Addendum) NPDES Permit No. TN0064041 Page No. A 7 of A 7 limits based on real world data and the technological treatment capability of the treatment unit. The limits are both reasonable for MNAA as well as protective of the environment.

VMJ Permit Addendum TN0064041. DOC Metro Nashville Airport Authority ( Addendum) NPDES Permit No. TN0064041 Page No. A 8 of A 7 COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT UNIT EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS 91% 83%

Date 02A Maximum Concentration 002 Maximum Concentration efficiency efficiency 02A Maximum FLOW 02A Loading 002 Maximum FLOW 002 Loading mg/ L mg/ L mg/ L mg/ L MGD lb/ day MGD lb/ day 09/ 30/ 1996 524 14 48 91 0.50 2203 0.69 80 11/ 30/ 1996 15 3 1 3 0.50 63 0.48 12 12/ 31/ 1996 12 10 1 2 0.50 50 0.50 42 02/ 28/ 1997 190 58 17 33 0.50 799 0.24 114 04/ 30/ 1997 18 4 2 3 0.32 48 0.33 11 06/ 30/ 1997 13 6 1 2 0.39 42 0.40 20 07/ 31/ 1997 28 6 3 5 0.30 70 0.39 19 08/ 31/ 1997 3 3 0 1 0.37 9 0.26 6 09/ 30/ 1997 14 5 1 2 0.53 61 0.31 13 10/ 31/ 1997 33 5 3 6 0.43 118 0.31 13 11/ 30/ 1997 84 3 8 15 0.28 198 0.39 10 12/ 31/ 1997 12 11 1 2 0.62 62 0.60 55 01/ 31/ 1998 340 92 31 59 0.62 1755 0.98 749 02/ 28/ 1998 590 98 54 103 0.47 2308 0.97 789 03/ 31/ 1998 340 53 31 59 0.47 1330 1.52 672 04/ 30/ 1998 220 12 20 38 0.47 861 0.72 72 05/ 31/ 1998 8 4 1 1 0.47 31 1.84 61 06/ 30/ 1998 2 2 0 0 0.53 9 2.14 36 10/ 31/ 1998 3 2 0 1 0.18 5 0.30 5 11/ 30/ 1998 31 6 3 5 0.03 9 0.36 18 12/ 31/ 1998 3090 9 280 539 0.01 258 1.10 82 01/ 31/ 1999 1520 360 138 265 0.49 6212 1.15 3447 02/ 28/ 1999 133 14 12 23 0.51 561 0.57 66 04/ 30/ 1999 57 4 5 10 0.40 190 1.16 39 11/ 30/ 1999 109 2 10 19 0.49 443 1.30 22 12/ 31/ 1999 17 3 2 3 0.57 81 1.09 27 03/ 31/ 2000 6 1 1 1 0.38 19 1.19 10 05/ 31/ 2000 4 4 0 1 0.48 16 0.75 25 11/ 30/ 2000 8 6 1 1 0.56 37 0.59 30 12/ 31/ 2000 1100 25 100 192 0.59 5413 0.50 104 01/ 31/ 2001 3110 104 282 543 0.44 11516 0.01 10 02/ 28/ 2001 488 21 44 85 0.49 2006 0.53 92 03/ 31/ 2001 90 10 8 16 0.35 262 0.54 45 04/ 30/ 2001 41 4 4 7 0.39 134 0.50 17 05/ 31/ 2001 7 5 1 1 0.48 28 0.64 27 11/ 20/ 2002 17 5 2 3 0.41 58 0.46 19 11/ 27/ 2002 2 5 0 0 0.08 1 0.16 7 12/ 04/ 2002 1560 18 142 272 0.33 4293 0.04 6 12/ 28/ 2002 35 39 3 6 0.14 41 0.10 33 01/ 03/ 2003 27 25 2 5 0.32 72 0.33 68 01/ 10/ 2003 61 20 6 11 0.14 72 0.13 21 01/ 15/ 2003 61 9 6 11 0.05 23 0.60 45 02/ 13/ 2003 439 55 40 77 0.34 1248 0.34 156 02/ 21/ 2003 176 42 16 31 0.43 630 0.43 150 02/ 28/ 2003 318 142 29 55 0.41 1098 0.41 490 03/ 07/ 2003 528 80 48 92 0.24 1039 0.24 157 03/ 14/ 2003 249 19 23 43 0.02 31 0.02 2 Average 335 30 30 58 0.38 975 0.61 170 91% eff 83% load eff.


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 61 (Friday, March 29, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11969-11970]
[FR Doc No: 2019-06121]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1709-001.
    Applicants: Stoneray Power Partners, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Stoneray Power Partners,
LLC.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5094.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1405-000.
    Applicants: Precept Power LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: INITIAL TARIFF, WAIVERS AND
BLANKET AUTHORITY to be effective 5/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5042.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1406-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-03-22_SA 3282 POI-Hill
Structure Replacement MPFCA (J475 J530) to be effective 3/8/2019.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5044.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1407-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-03-22_SA 3283 Franklin-
Wall Lake 161 kV Line Upgrade MPFCA (J498 J535) to be effective 3/8/
2019.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5063.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1408-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., Great
River Energy.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-03-22_SA 3292 GRE- DLP
TIA (Frog Creek Bypass Switch) to be effective 3/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5070.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1409-000.
    Applicants: Birdsboro Power LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Reactive Power Tariff
Application to be effective 5/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5089.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1410-000.
    Applicants: Mid-Atlantic Interstate Transmission, LLC, PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: MAIT submits OIA SA Nos.
4577 and 4578 to be effective 5/21/2019.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5100.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1411-000.
    Applicants: GenOn Bowline, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Notice of Succession and
Revisions to MBR Tariff and Request for Waivers to be effective 3/11/
2019.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5104.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1412-000.
    Applicants: GenOn Canal, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Notice of Succession and
Revisions to MBR Tariff and Request for Waivers to be effective 3/11/
2019.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5105.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1413-000.
    Applicants: GenOn Chalk Point, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Notice of Succession and
Revisions to MBR Tariff and Request for Waivers to be effective 3/11/
2019.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5106.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1414-000.
    Applicants: GenOn REMA, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Notice of Succession and
Revisions to MBR Tariff and Request for Waivers to be effective 3/11/
2019.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5109.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1415-000.
    Applicants: GenOn California South, LP.

    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Notice of Succession and
Revisions to MBR Tariff and Request for Waivers to be effective 3/11/
2019.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5110.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1416-000.
    Applicants: GenOn Florida, LP.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Notice of Succession and
Revisions to MBR Tariff and Request for Waivers to be effective 3/11/
2019.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5111.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1418-000.
    Applicants: GenOn Wholesale Generation, LP.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Notice of Succession and
Revisions to MBR Tariff and Request for Waivers to be effective 3/11/
2019.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5113.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1419-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: OATT Revised Attachment H-1
(Rev Depreciation Rates 2019) to be effective 6/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5114.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1420-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-03-22 Gridforce Dynamic
Transfer Balancing Authority Operating Agreement to be effective 5/22/
2019.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5117.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1421-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Indiana, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019 Annual Reconciliation
Filing to be effective 7/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5143.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1422-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of WMPA SA
No. 4360; Queue No. AA1-080 to be effective 5/2/2019.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5144.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following public
utility holding company filings:

    Docket Numbers: PH19-8-000.
    Applicants: Pacolet Milliken Enterprises, LLC.
    Description: Pacolet Milliken Enterprises, LLC submits FERC 65-B
Waiver Notification.
    Filed Date: 3/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190322-5136.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/19.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 22, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-06121 Filed 3-28-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: June 21, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 118)]
[Notices]
[Page 35113-35115]
[DOCID:fr21jn10-150]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-62295; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2010-070]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by NASDAQ Stock Market LLC To
List Options on Trust Issued Receipts in $1 Strike Intervals

June 15, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 10, 2010 The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by NASDAQ. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC proposes to amend Chapter IV,
Securities Traded on NOM, Section 6, Series of Options Contracts Open
for Trading, to allow the Exchange to list options on Trust Issued
Receipts in $1 strike price intervals.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://www.nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, on the Commission's Web site at http://
www.sec.gov, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Chapter IV,
Securities Traded on NOM, Section 6, Series of Options Contracts Open
for Trading, by adding additional text to Section 6(d)(v) to allow the
Exchange to list options on the Trust Issued Receipts (``TIRs''),
including HOLding Company Depository ReceiptS (``HOLDRS''), as defined
in Supplementary Material to Section 6 at .01(b), in $1 or greater
strike price intervals, where the strike price is $200 or less and $5
or greater where the strike price is greater than $200.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ HOLDRS are a type of Trust Issued Receipt and the current
proposal would permit $1 strikes for options on HOLDRS (where the
strike price is less than $200).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, the strike price intervals for options on TIRs are as
follows: (1) $2.50 or greater where the strike price is $25.00 or less;
(2) $5.00 or greater where the strike price is greater than $25.00; and
(3) $10.00 or greater where the strike price is greater than $200.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Chapter IV, Section 6(d). See also Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 61347 (January 13, 2010), 75 FR 3513 (January 21,
2010) (SR-NASDAQ-2010-003).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is seeking to permit $1 strikes for options on TIRs
(where the strike price is less than $200) because TIRs have
characteristics similar to exchange-traded funds (``ETFs'').
Specifically, TIRs are exchange-listed securities representing
beneficial ownership of the specific deposited securities represented
by the receipts. They are negotiable receipts issued by a trust
representing securities of issuers that have been deposited and held on
behalf of the holders of the TIRs. TIRs, which trade in round-lots of
100, and multiples thereof, may be issued after their initial offering
through a deposit with the trustee of the required number of shares of
common stock of the underlying issuers. This characteristic of TIRs is
similar to that of ETFs which also may be created on any business day
upon receipt of the requisite securities or other investment assets
comprising a creation unit. The trust only issues receipts upon the
deposit of the shares of the underlying securities that are represented
by a round-lot of 100 receipts. Likewise, the trust will cancel, and an
investor may obtain, hold, trade or surrender TIRs in a round-lot and
round-lot multiples of 100 receipts.
    Strike prices for ETF options are permitted in $1 or greater
intervals where the strike price is $200 or less and $5 or greater
where the strike is greater than $200.\5\ Accordingly, the Exchange
believes that the rationale for permitting $1 strikes for ETF options
equally applies to permitting $1 strikes for options on TIRs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Chapter IV, Supplementary Material to Section 6 at
.01(b), (permitting $1 strikes for options on Units covered under
Section 6(d) also known as ETF options).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has analyzed its capacity and represents that it
believes the Exchange and the Options Price Reporting Authority have
the necessary system capacity to handle the additional traffic
associated with the listing and trading of $1 strikes, where the strike
price is less than $200, for options on TIRs.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \6\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \7\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest,
by allowing the Exchange to list options on TIRs at $1 strike price
intervals. The Exchange believes that the marketplace and investors
expect options on TIRs to trade in a similar manner to ETF options and
this filing would allow the marketplace and investors the ability to
trade options on TIRs. The Exchange further believes that investors
will be better served if $1 strike price intervals are available for
options on TIRs, where the strike price is less than $200.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    NASDAQ does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not significantly
affect the protection of investors or the public interest, does not
impose any significant burden on competition, and, by its terms, does
not become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed,
or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the self-regulatory organization to submit to the
Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule
change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of
the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Commission has waived the five-day pre-filing
requirement in this case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day
operative delay. The Commission believes that waiver of the operative
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest because the proposal is substantially similar to a rule of
another exchange that has been approved by the Commission.\10\
Therefore, the Commission designates the proposal operative upon
filing.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Securities Exchange Release No. 34-62141 (May 20,
2010), 75 FR 29787 (May 27, 2010) (SR-CBOE-2010-036).
    \11\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2010-070 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2010-070. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal

identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2010-070 and should be submitted
on or before July 12, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-14964 Filed 6-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 191 (Monday, October 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68101-68102]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23793]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2011-0107]

Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), this document provides the public notice that by a document
dated July 18, 2016, CSX Transportation (CSX) requested that the
Federal Railroad Administration's (FRA) Railroad Safety Board (Board)
issue an expansion of the territory allowed for its nonstop continuous
rail testing process. CSX's existing waiver in this docket exempts it
from the requirements of 49 CFR 213.113(a) so that it could implement a
pilot test process for nonstop continuous rail testing. The projected
starting date for implementing the process on the additional
territories would be August 14, 2016, and the waiver process would
continue up to December 31, 2017. The original

approved waiver allows CSX to perform the continuous test process on
the main tracks between Richmond, VA, and Jacksonville, FL; between
Albany, NY, and Buffalo, NY; and on the C&O Division from Russell, KY,
to Newport News, VA. CSX is proposing the testing frequency along the
mainline tracks not to exceed 62 days.
    Expanded territory will include: Chicago Division, Barr Subdivision
(Gary, IN, to Riverdale, IL, Milepost (MP) DC 0-DC 11.4 tracks 1 and
2); Barr Subdivision (Portage, IN, to Gary, IN, MP BI 236.9-BI 249
tracks 1 and 2); Garrett Subdivision (Auburn, IN, to Portage, IN, MP BI
124.7-BI 236.9 tracks 1, 2, and 3); Garrett East Subdivision (Deshler,
OH, to Auburn, IN, MP BI 62.8-BI 124.7 tracks 1 and 2); Great Lakes
Division, Willard Subdivision (Willard, OH, to Deshler, OH, MP BI 4.2-
BI 62.8 tracks 1 and 2); Willard Terminal Subdivision (Willard, OH, to
Willard, OH, MP BI 0-BI 4.2 1, 2, and 3); Willard Terminal Subdivision
(Greenwich, OH, to Willard, OH, MP BG 192.9-BG 204 tracks 1, 2, and 3);
Greenwich Subdivision (Berea, OH, to Greenwich, OH, MP QI 14.4-QI 54.46
tracks 1 and 2) Cleveland Shortline Subdivision (Cleveland, OH, to
Berea, OH, MP QDS 0-QDS 23.5 tracks 1 and 2); Cleveland Terminal
Subdivision (Euclid, OH, to Cleveland, OH, MP QD 171.2-QD 174.83 tracks
1 and 2); Erie West Subdivision (Derby, NY, to Euclid, OH, MP QD 15.6-
QD 171.2 4 tracks 1, 2, 3, and 4); Albany Division, Buffalo Terminal
Subdivision (Buffalo, NY, to Derby, NY, MP QD 0-QD 15.6 tracks 1, 2,
and 3); Buffalo Terminal Subdivision (North Chili, NY, to Buffalo, NY,
MP QC 382.8-QC 437.8 tracks 1, 2, 3, and 4) Rochester Subdivision
(Syracuse, NY, to North Chili, NY, MP QC 296.8-382.8 tracks 1 and 2)
Syracuse Terminal Subdivision (Oneida, NY, to Syracuse, NY, MP QC
263.7-QC 296.8 tracks 1, 2, and 3); Mohawk Subdivision (Amsterdam, NY,
to Oneida, NY, MP QC 169.7-QC 263.7 tracks 1 and 2); Selkirk
Subdivision (Selkirk, NY, to Amsterdam, NY, MP QG 13.7-QG 42.47 tracks
1 and 2); Castleton Subdivision (Selkirk, NY, to Selkirk, NY, MP QG
11.7-QG 13.7 tracks 1 and 2); River Subdivision (North Bergen, NJ, to
Selkirk, NY, MP QR 1.68-QR 132.6 track 1 and 2); Trenton Subdivision
(Philadelphia, PA, to Manville NJ, MP QA 0-QA 57.33 tracks 1, 2, and
3); Baltimore Division Philadelphia Subdivision (Philadelphia, PA, to
Philadelphia, PA, MP BBF 0-BBF 1.38 tracks 1 and 2); Philadelphia
Subdivision (Philadelphia, PA, to Baltimore, MD, MP BAK 0-BAK 89.6
tracks 1, 2, and 3); Baltimore Terminal Subdivision (Baltimore, MD, to
Baltimore, MD, MP BAK 89.6-BAK 96.6 tracks 1 and 2); Baltimore Terminal
Subdivision (Baltimore, MD, to Halethorpe, MD, MP BAA 0-BAA 6.5 tracks
1, 2, and 3) Capital Subdivision (Halethorpe, MD, to Hyattsville, MD,
MP BAA 6.6-BAA 33.1 tracks 1 and 2) Capital Subdivision (Hyattsville,
MD, to Washington, DC, MP CFP 113.8-CFP 121.7 tracks 1 and 2) RF&P
Subdivision (Richmond, VA, to Washington, DC, MP CFP 5.1-CFP 113.8
tracks 1, 2, 3, and 4); Florence Division Richmond Terminal Subdivision
(Richmond, VA, to Richmond, VA, MP CFP 1-5.1 tracks 1 and 2); Richmond
Terminal Subdivision (Richmond, VA, to Richmond, VA, MP ARN 0-ARN 3.6
tracks 1 and 2); North End Subdivision (Richmond, VA, to Rocky Mount,
NC, MP A-A 119.9 tracks 1 and 2); South End Subdivision (Rocky Mount,
NC, to Dillon, SC, MP A 119.9-A 262.9 tracks 1 and 2).
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation's (DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Operations
Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
     Web site: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
    Communications received by November 17, 2016 will be considered by
FRA before final action is taken. Comments received after that date
will be considered as far as practicable.
    Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the document,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the
public to better inform its processes. DOT posts these comments,
without edit, including any personal information the commenter
provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy.
See also https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice for the privacy
notice of regulations.gov.

Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety, Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-23793 Filed 9-30-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 139 (Friday, July 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43186-43187]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17286]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IC13-18-000; FERC-547]

Commission Information Collection Activities; Comment Request;
Extension

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of information collection and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (Commission or FERC) is soliciting public comment on the
currently approved information collection, FERC-547 (Gas Pipeline
Rates: Refund Report Requirements).

DATES: Comments on the collection of information are due September 17,
2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments (identified by Docket No. IC13-18-
000) by either of the following methods:
     eFiling at Commission's Web site: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp.
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Instructions: All submissions must be formatted and filed in
accordance with submission guidelines at: http://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide.asp. For user assistance contact FERC Online Support
by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by phone at:<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll-free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> for TTY.
    Docket: Users interested in receiving automatic notification of
activity in this docket or in viewing/downloading comments and
issuances in this docket may do so at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/docs-filing.asp.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Brown may be reached by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, and fax at (202)
273-0873.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Gas Pipeline Rates: Refund Report Requirements.
    OMB Control No.: 1902-0084.
    Type of Request: Three-year extension of the FERC-547 information
collection requirements with no changes to the current reporting
requirements.
    Abstract: The Commission uses FERC-547 (Gas Pipeline Rates: Refund
Report Requirements) to implement the

statutory refund provisions governed by Sections 4, 5 and 16 of the
Natural Gas Act (NGA).\1\ Sections 4 and 5 authorize the Commission to
order a refund (with interest) for any portion of a natural gas
company's increased rate or charge found to be unjust or unreasonable.
Refunds may also be instituted by a natural gas company as a
stipulation to a Commission-approved settlement agreement or a
provision under the company's tariff. Section 16 of the NGA authorizes
the Commission to prescribe rules and regulations necessary to
administer its refund mandates. The Commission's refund reporting
requirements are located in 18 CFR 154.501 and 154.502.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 717-717w.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission uses the data to monitor refunds owed by natural gas
companies to ensure that the flow-through of refunds owed by these
companies are made as expeditiously as possible and to assure that
refunds are made in compliance with the Commission's regulations.
    Type of Respondents: Natural gas companies.
    Estimate of Annual Burden: \2\ The Commission reduces its estimate
of the total Public Reporting Burden for this information collection
from the estimate made three years ago based on the number of filings
received over the previous three years (from an average of 30
respondents to an average of 11 respondents currently).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The Commission defines burden as the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain,
retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal
agency. For further explanation of what is included in the
information collection burden, reference 5 Code of Federal
Regulations 1320.3.

                                                FERC-547: Gas Pipeline Rates: Refund Report Requirements
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of                       Average burden
                                                                        Number of      responses per   Total number of     hours per     Estimated total
                                                                       respondents       respondent       responses         response      annual burden
                                                                                (A)              (B)    (A) x (B) = (C)            (D)                (C) x (D)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Natural Gas Companies..............................................              11                1               11               75              825
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The total estimated annual cost burden to respondents is $57,750.
[825 hours * $70/hour \3\ = $57,750].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ FY2013 Estimated Average Hourly Cost per FTE, including
salary + benefits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comments: Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden and
cost of the collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information collection; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.

    Dated: July 12, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-17286 Filed 7-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 206)]
[Notices]
[Page 65704-65705]
[DOCID:fr26oc10-149]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Office of Hazardous Materials Safety; Notice of Application for
Special Permits

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: List of Applications for Special Permits.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations (49 CFR Part 107,
Subpart B), notice is hereby given that the Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety has received the application described herein. Each
mode of transportation for which a particular special permit is
requested is indicated by a number in the ``Nature of Application''
portion of the table below as follows: 1--Motor vehicle, 2--Rail
freight, 3--Cargo vessel, 4--Cargo aircraft only, 5--Passenger-carrying
aircraft.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 26, 2010.
    Address Comments to: Record Center, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Washington, DC 20590.
    Comments should refer to the application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of comments is desired, include
a self-addressed stamped postcard showing the special permit number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the applications are
available for inspection in the Records Center, East Building, PHH-30,
1200 New Jersey Avenue Southeast, Washington DC or at http://
regulations.gov.
    This notice of receipt of applications for special permit is
published in accordance with Part 107 of the Federal hazardous
materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 19, 2010.
Donald Burger,
Chief, Special Permits and Approvals Branch.

                                               New Special Permits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   Regulation(s)       Nature of special permits
    Application No.       Docket No.          Applicant               affected                  thereof
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15112-N...............  ..............  Explo Systems.com      49 CFR 173.62........  To authorize the
                                         MINDEN, LA.                                   transportation of a
                                                                                Division 1.3 explosive
                                                                                (M6 solid propellant) in
                                                                                alternative packaging
                                                                                (supersack). (Mode 1).
15135-N...............  ..............  Product Quest Mfg,     49 CFR 173.306         To authorize the commerce
                                         LLC Daytona Beach,     (a)(3)(v)              of certain DOT 2P non-
                                         FL.                    transportation in.     refillable aerosol
                                                                                containers that are leak
                                                                                tested by an alternative
                                                                                method in lieu of the
                                                                                required hot water bath.
                                                                                (Modes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5).
15136-N...............  ..............  Luxfer Gas Cylinders   49 CFR 173.302a(a),    To authorize the
                                         RIVERSIDE, CA.         173.304a(a), 175.3     manufacture, marking,
                                                                and 180.205.           sale and use of a non-DOT
                                                                                specification fully-
                                                                                wrapped carbon fiber
                                                                                composite cylinder with a
                                                                                seamless aluminum liner
                                                                                designed, manufactured
                                                                                and tested in accordance
                                                                                with ISO 11119 part 2.
                                                                                (Modes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5).
15141-N...............  ..............  Material Innovations,  49 CFR 172.101 Column  To authorize the
                                         Inc. Knoxville, TN.    (9), Part 172 except   manufacture, marking,
                                                                for air, and           sale and use of non-DOT
                                                                173.302a.              specification metal
                                                                                containers containing
                                                                                Boron Trifluoride,
                                                                                classed as Division 2.3
                                                                                for use in radiation
                                                                                detectors. (Modes 1, 2,
                                                                                3, 4, 5).
15143-N...............  ..............  Warbelow's Air         49 CFR 173.302(f) (3)  To authorize the
                                         Ventures, Inc.-FC      and (f)(4) and         transportation in
                                         Fairbanks, AK.         173.304(f)(3) and      commerce of cylinders
                                                                (f)(4).                containing oxidizing
                                                                                gases without outer
                                                                                packaging capable of
                                                                                passing the Flame
                                                                                Penetration and
                                                                                Resistance Test and the
                                                                                Thermal Resistance Test
                                                                                when no other practical
                                                                                means of transportation
                                                                                exist. (Mode 4).
15146-N...............  ..............  ITW Tech Spray LLC     49 CFR 173.304(d)....  To authorize the
                                         AMARILLO, TX.                                 transportation in
                                                                                commerce of a refrigerant
                                                                                gas in a DOT 2Q
                                                                                container. (Modes 1, 2,
                                                                                3, 4).
15149-N...............  ..............  American Spraytech     49 CFR 173.306         To authorize the
                                         North Branch, NJ.      (a)(3)(v).             transportation in
                                                                                commerce of certain
                                                                                aerosols containing a
                                                                                Division 2.2 compressed
                                                                                gas in certain non-
                                                                                refillable aerosol
                                                                                containers which are not
                                                                                subject to the hot water
                                                                                bath test. (Mode 1).
15150-N...............  ..............  National Aeronautics   49 CFR 180.205.......  To authorize the
                                         and Space                                     transportation in
                                         Administration                                commerce of certain
                                         (NASA) Kennedy Space                          cylinders that are
                                         Center, FL.                                   retesting using acoustic
                                                                                emissions and are tested
                                                                                every 10 years rather
                                                                                than every five years.
                                                                                (Modes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5).
15156-N...............  ..............  Ludlum Measurements    49 CFR 173.302a,       To authorize the
                                         Inc. Sweetwater, TX.   173.306(a)(2),         manufacture, marking,
                                                                172.400 except for     sale and use of a non-
                                                                air transportation     specification plastic
                                                                and 172.504.           pressure vessel for
                                                                                transportation of non-
                                                                                flammable compressed
                                                                                gases. (Modes 1, 2, 3, 4,
                                                                                5, 6).
15161-N...............  ..............  Exide Technologies     49 CFR 173.159(e)....  To authorize the
                                         Milton, GA.                                   transportation in
                                                                                commerce of lead
                                                                                batteries from more than
                                                                                one shipper without
                                                                                voiding the exception in
                                                                                Sec.   173.159(e). (Mode
                                                                                1).
15162-N...............  ..............  Billings Flying        49 CFR 172.101 Column  To authorize the
                                         Service, Inc.          (9B), 172.204(c)(3),   transportation in
                                         Billings, MT.          175.30(a)(1) and       commerce of certain
                                                                Part 178.              explosives that are
                                                                                forbidden for
                                                                                transportation by cargo
                                                                                aircraft in alternative
                                                                                packaging when
                                                                                transported in Part 133
                                                                                sling load operations.
                                                                                (Mode 4).
15163-N...............  ..............  Peninsula Airways      49 CFR 173.302 (f)(3)  To authorize the
                                         Inc. (PenAir)          and (f)(4) and         transportation in
                                         Anchorage, AK.         173.304(f)(3) and      commerce of cylinders
                                                                (f)(4).                containing oxidizing
                                                                                gases without without
                                                                                outer packaging capable
                                                                                of passing the Flame
                                                                                Penetration and
                                                                                Resistance Test and the
                                                                                Thermal Resistance Test
                                                                                when no other practical
                                                                                means of transportation
                                                                                exist. (Modes 4, 5).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2010-26726 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4909-60-M


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8961-8962]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04264]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R01-OAR-2009-0436; FRL-9974-69--Region 1]

Air Plan Approval; Rhode Island; Enhanced Motor Vehicle
Inspection and Maintenance Program; Reopening of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of the public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reopening the
public comment period for the proposed approval of Rhode Island's
enhanced motor vehicle inspection and maintenance program State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision. The proposed rule published in the
Federal Register on November 14, 2017. Written comments on the proposed
rule were to be submitted to EPA on or before December 14, 2017. The
purpose of this document is to reopen the comment period for an
additional 30 days. This extension of the comment period is provided to
allow the public additional time to provide comment on the November 14,
2017 proposed rule.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 2, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01-
OAR-2009-0436 at www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video,

etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and should include discussion of all
points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments
or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on
the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional
submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. Publicly available docket materials are
available at www.regulations.gov or at the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, Air Quality Planning Unit, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100,
Boston, MA. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the
contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
legal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ariel Garcia, Air Quality Planning
Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Region 1 Regional
Office, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 (mail code: OEP05-2), Boston,
MA 02109-3912, telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Background: In the withdrawal of direct final rule published in the
Federal Register on January 9, 2018 (83 FR 984), EPA stated the intent
to institute an extended comment period for the November 14, 2017
proposed rule (82 FR 52682) by publishing a notice of data
availability.
    Extension of Comment Period: The adverse comment received on EPA's
direct final rule requested that EPA hold a new public comment period,
because EPA did not make all relevant documents available in the docket
at www.regulations.gov. EPA has made available all documents, which are
compatible with the electronic docket system, at the docket identified
by Docket ID No. EPA-R01-OAR-2009-0436 at www.regulations.gov. All
other documents, including emissions modeling files submitted as part
of Rhode Island's enhanced motor vehicles inspection and maintenance
program SIP revision, are available for public review by visiting the
EPA New England Regional Office or by contacting the contact listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. This reopening of comment
period also serves as the notice of data availability referenced in the
January 9, 2018 withdrawal of direct final rule.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: February 21, 2018.
Alexandra Dapolito Dunn,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. 2018-04264 Filed 3-1-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P