[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 164 (Thursday, August 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 42674]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18234]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2018-0706]

Cook Inlet Regional Citizens' Advisory Council (CIRCAC)
Recertification

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of recertification.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice informs the public that the Coast Guard has
recertified the Cook Inlet Regional Citizens' Advisory Council (CIRCAC)
as an alternative voluntary advisory group for Cook Inlet, Alaska. This
certification allows the CIRCAC to monitor the activities of terminal
facilities and crude oil tankers under an alternative composition,
other than prescribed, Cook Inlet Program established by statue.

DATES: This recertification is effective for the period from September
1, 2018 through August 31, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LCDR Jonathan Dale, Seventeenth Coast
Guard District (dpi), by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, email at
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background and Purpose

    As part of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, Congress passed the Oil
Terminal and Oil Tanker Environmental Oversight and Monitoring Act of
1990 (the Act), 33 U.S.C. 2732, to foster a long-term partnership among
industry, government, and local communities in overseeing compliance
with environmental concerns in the operation of crude oil terminals and
oil tankers.
    The President has delegated his authority under 33 U.S.C. 2732(o)
respecting certification of advisory councils, or groups, subject to
the Act to the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.
Section 8(g) of Executive Order 12777, (56 FR 54757, October 22, 1991),
as amended by section 34 of Executive Order 13286 (68 FR 10619, March
5, 2003). The Secretary redelegated that authority to the Commandant of
the USCG. Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1,
paragraph 80 of section II. The Commandant redelegated that authority
to the Chief, Office of Marine Safety, Security and Environmental
Protection (G-M) on March 19, 1992 (letter #5402).
    The Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety and Environmental
Protection (G-M), redelegated recertification authority for advisory
councils, or groups, to the Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard District
on February 26, 1999 (letter #16450).
    On July 7, 1993, the USCG published a policy statement,
``Alternative Voluntary Advisory Groups, Prince William Sound and Cook
Inlet'' (58 FR 36504), to clarify the factors considered in making the
determination as to whether advisory councils, or groups, should be
certified in accordance with the Act.
    On September 16, 2002, the USCG published a policy statement, 67 FR
58440, which changed the recertification procedures such that
applicants are required to provide the USCG with comprehensive
information every three years (triennially). For each of the two years
between the triennial application procedures, applicants submit a
letter requesting recertification that includes a description of any
substantive changes to the information provided at the previous
triennial recertification. Further, public comment is only solicited
during the triennial comprehensive review.

Recertification

    By letter dated August 2, 2018, the Commander, Seventeenth Coast
Guard District, certified that the CIRCAC qualifies as an alternative
voluntary advisory group under 33 U.S.C. 2732(o). This recertification
terminates on August 31, 2019.

    Dated: August 2, 2018.
Matthew T. Bell, Jr.,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2018-18234 Filed 8-22-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 166 (Monday, August 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51811-51814]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20946]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-D-0881]

Draft Guidance for Industry on Self-Identification of Generic
Drug Facilities, Sites, and Organizations; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ``Self-
Identification of Generic Drug Facilities, Sites, and

Organizations.'' On July 9, 2012, the Generic Drug User Fee Amendments
of 2012 (GDUFA) (Pub. L. 112-144, Title III) was signed into law by the
President. GDUFA, designed to speed the delivery of safe and effective
generic drugs to the public and reduce costs to industry, requires that
generic drug facilities, sites, and organizations around the world
provide identification information annually to FDA. This guidance is
intended to assist industry as it prepares to meet the self-
identification requirement. It explains who is required to self-
identify, what information must be requested, how the information
should be submitted to FDA, and what the penalty is for failure to
self-identify.

DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment on this
draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments concerning the
proposed collection of information by October 26, 2012. Submit either
electronic or written comments on the draft guidance by October 26,
2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing
your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance document.
    Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaewon Hong, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (HFD-300), Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993, 1-866-405-5367 or 301-796-
6707.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On July 9, 2012, the Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012
(GDUFA) (Pub. L. 112-144, Title III) was signed into law by the
President. GDUFA is designed to speed the delivery of safe and
effective generic drugs to the public and reduce costs to industry.
GDUFA enables FDA to assess user fees to fund critical and measurable
enhancements to FDA's generic drugs program. GDUFA will also
significantly improve global supply chain transparency by requiring
owners of facilities producing generic drug products and active
pharmaceutical ingredients (API) and certain other sites and
organizations that support the manufacture or approval of these
products to electronically self-identify with FDA and update that
information annually.
    Self-identification is required for two purposes. First, it is
necessary to determine the universe of facilities required to pay user
fees. Once the self-identification process has been completed, FDA will
determine the fees and publish the amounts in the Federal Register.
Second, self-identification is a central component of an effort to
promote global supply chain transparency. The information provided
through self-identification will enable quick, accurate, and reliable
surveillance of generic drugs and facilitate inspections and
compliance.
    This guidance is intended to assist human generic drug facilities,
sites, and organizations by describing how FDA will implement the self-
identification requirement contained in GDUFA. As required by GDUFA, in
the coming weeks FDA will issue a self-identification requirement
notice in the Federal Register. The notice will explain that human
generic drug facilities, sites, and organizations are required to
submit identification information electronically to FDA within 60 days.
The notice will also list the self-identification information that must
be submitted. FDA is issuing this guidance to assist industry as it
prepares to meet the self-identification requirement. The guidance
explains who is required to self-identify, what information must be
requested, how the information should be submitted to FDA, and what the
penalty is for failure to self-identify.
    To facilitate the implementation of the self-identification
requirement in GDUFA, FDA is establishing a new system for the
electronic self-identification of generic industry facilities, sites,
and organizations. Entities that are required to register and list
under section 510 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or
section 351 of the Public Health Service Act, and those entities
required to self-identify under GDUFA, will submit information
separately to the respective systems. Each system will populate its own
database to meet unique requirements and deadlines. The new GDUFA
system will use the same platform and technical standards already
familiar to manufacturers required to register and list.
    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the Agency's current thinking on self-
identification of generic drug facilities, sites, and organizations. It
does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not
operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be used
if such approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.

II. Comments

    Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this
document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. Identify
comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3501-3520), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information that
they conduct or sponsor. ``Collection of information'' is defined in 44
U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or
requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records,
or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), requires Federal agencies to provide a
60-day notice in the Federal Register for each proposed collection of
information before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, FDA is publishing this notice of the
proposed collection of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the collection of information associated with this
draft guidance, FDA invites comments on the following topics: (1)
Whether the proposed information collected is necessary for the proper
performance of FDA's functions, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimated burden of
the proposed information collected, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of information collected on the

respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of information
technology.
    Under GDUFA, and as described in the draft guidance, electronic
self-identification will be required by all facilities, sites, and
organizations involved in the development and manufacturing of generic
drugs identified or intended to be identified in an approved or pending
FDA generic drug submission. The electronic self-identification
requirement applies equally to all domestic and foreign facilities and
is independent of the obligation to pay user fees.
    Generic drug facilities, sites, and organizations required under
GDUFA to self-identify include:
    1. Facilities that manufacture, or intend to manufacture, human
generic drug APIs or FDFs, or both.
    2. Sites and organizations that package the FDF of a human generic
drug into the primary container/closure system and label the primary
container/closure system.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Sites and organizations that package the FDF of a human
generic drug into the primary container/closure system and label the
primary container/closure system are considered to be manufacturers,
whether or not that packaging is done pursuant to a contract or by
the applicant itself.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. Sites that are identified in a generic drug submission and
pursuant to a contract with the applicant remove the drug from a
primary container/closure system and subdivide the contents into a
different primary container/closure system.
    4. Bioequivalence (BE)/bioavailability (BA) sites that are
identified in a generic drug submission and conduct clinical BE/BA
testing, bioanalytical testing of samples collected from clinical BE/BA
testing, and/or in vitro BE testing.
    5. Sites that are identified in a generic drug submission and
perform testing of one or more attributes or characteristics of the FDF
or the API pursuant to a contract with the applicant to satisfy a
current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) testing requirement
(excludes sites that are testing for research purposes only).
    All of the facilities, sites, and organizations listed above are
currently required to register and list except for 4.
    FDA is establishing a new system for self-identification of generic
industry facilities, sites, and organizations. Entities that are
required to register and list, and those that are required to self-
identify, will submit information to both systems separately. Each
system will populate its own database to meet unique requirements and
deadlines. Although separate, both systems are built on a common
process already familiar to manufacturers required to register and
list. This will minimize the cost and effort associated with
compliance.
    FDA will use the same electronic exchange standards and formats for
self-identification that are used in the Drug Registration and Listing
System (eDRLS) including XML file formats, which conform to message
standards for Structured Product Labeling (SPL). Facilities, sites, and
organizations will be able to generate electronic SPL files in the free
eSubmitter tool available on FDA's Web site, or other commercially
available tools, and submit the files through FDA's Electronic
Submissions Gateway. Facilities, sites, and organizations will be
required to provide Data Universal Numbering System (D-U-N-S) numbers
and Facility Establishment Identifiers (FEI) to enable quick and
accurate identification of registrants as well as facilities, sites,
and organizations. They will also be required to submit information
about the registrant, facility, and SPL file. Requested information
will include:

Document Information--
Type of Document
ID Root
Set ID Root
Version number
Effective Time
Registrant Information--
Name
Registrant D-U-N-S Number
Registrant Contact Information
Establishment (Facility) Information--
Name
Establishment Facility D-U-N-S Number
FEI
Physical address
Type of Business Operations
Establishment (Facility) Contact Information

    FDA estimates that approximately 2,650 facilities, sites, and
organizations (``number of respondents'' in Table 1) will submit the
self-identification information set forth above and described in the
draft guidance, resulting in approximately 3,000 annual submissions
(``total annual responses'' in Table 1). Although there will be one
self-identification submission annually by each facility, site, and
organization, we rounded the estimate upwards to approximately 3,000 to
account for any revisions to the submissions, if needed. These
estimates are based on FDA's database of manufacturers in eDRLS and are
consistent with conversations between the Agency and representatives of
regulated industry during the generic drug user fee negotiations. We
also estimate that preparing and submitting this information will take
approximately 2.5 hours for each facility (``hours per response'' in
Table 1). We base this estimate on the hour burden estimate for
submitting drug registration information electronically under eDRLS, as
approved by OMB under control number 0910-0045. Most facilities, sites,
and organizations are familiar with the eDRLS process and already have
the self-identification information available. Entities that are
required to register would submit this information separately to the
eDRLS system, as approved by OMB under control number 0910-0045.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                 Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Number of
                                     Number of     responses per   Total annual      Hours per      Total hours
                                    respondents     respondent       responses       response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Generic Drug Facility and Site             2,650            1.13           3,000             2.5           7,500
 Electronic Self-Identification
 (including any revisions to the
 submission)....................
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.......................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............           7,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this information collection.

IV. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: August 17, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-20946 Filed 8-22-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 183 (Friday, September 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 53110]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20690]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4515-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

Indiana; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Indiana (FEMA-4515-DR), dated April 3, 2020, and
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued August 5, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
dated April 3, 2020 for the State of Indiana is hereby amended to
include the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

    All areas within the State of Indiana are eligible for
assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-20690 Filed 9-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 57 (Monday, March 25, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11115-11116]
[FR Doc No: 2019-05615]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4415-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2019-0001]

Mississippi; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-4415-DR), dated February
14, 2019, and related determinations.

DATES: The declaration was issued February 14, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated February 14, 2019, the President issued a major disaster
declaration under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the
``Stafford Act''), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State
of Mississippi resulting from severe storms, flooding, and tornado
during the period of December 27 to December 28, 2018, is of
sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a major disaster
declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford
Act''). Therefore, I declare that such a major disaster exists in
the State of Mississippi.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Public Assistance in the
designated areas and Hazard Mitigation throughout the State.
Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance be
supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Hazard Mitigation will be limited to 75 percent of the total
eligible costs. Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Public Assistance also will be limited to 75 percent of the total
eligible costs, with the exception of projects that meet the
eligibility criteria for a higher Federal cost-sharing percentage
under the Public Assistance Alternative Procedures Pilot Program for
Debris Removal implemented pursuant to section 428 of the Stafford
Act.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under
Executive Order 12148, as amended, Jon K. Huss, of FEMA is appointed to
act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major disaster.
    The following areas of the State of Mississippi have been
designated as adversely affected by this major disaster:

    Clarke, Covington, Forrest, Greene, Jasper, Jones, Marion,
Newton, Perry, and Wayne Counties for Public Assistance.
    All areas within the State of Mississippi are eligible for
assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2019-05615 Filed 3-22-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 189 (Thursday, September 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60491-60492]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25053]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM98-1-000]

Records Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public Notice

    This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of
the receipt of prohibited and exempt off-the-record communications.
    Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission
decisional employees, who make or receive a prohibited or exempt off-
the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested
proceeding, to deliver to the Secretary of the Commission, a copy of
the communication, if written, or a summary of the substance of any
oral communication.
    Prohibited communications are included in a public, non-decisional
file associated with, but not a part of, the decisional record of the
proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited
communication and any responses thereto should become a part of the
decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or
contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication, and may
request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and
responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant
such a request only when it determines that fairness so requires. Any
person identified below as having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the document on all parties listed on the
official service list for the applicable proceeding in accordance with
Rule 2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
    Exempt off-the-record communications are included in the decisional
record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
    The following is a list of off-the-record communications recently

received by the Secretary of the Commission. The communications listed
are grouped by docket numbers in ascending order. These filings are
available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or
may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using
the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number, excluding the last three
digits, in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC, Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Docket No.                   File date                    Presenter or requester
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prohibited:
    1. ER07-86-018, ER07-88-018; ER07-92-       9-15-11  Donald Patton.\1\
     018.
    2. P-11858-002/004, ER08-654-000, ER06-     9-20-11  David Kates.
     278-000.
Exempt:
    1. CP10-480-000.......................      9-20-11  Hon. Claire McCaskill.
    2. CP10-480-000.......................       9-8-11  Hon. Patrick J. Toomey.
    3. DI10-9-000.........................      9-12-11  Hon. Joyce A. Maker.
    4. DI10-9-000.........................      9-12-11  Linda S. Pagels-Wentworth.
    5. Project No. 459-000................      9-21-11  Hon. Blaine Luetkemeye, et al.
    6. Project No. 459-000................       9-9-11  Hon. Claire McCaskill.
                                                         Hon. Roy Blunt.
    7. Project No. 2149-000...............      9-21-11  Ron Walter.
                                                         Keith W. Goehner.
                                                          Doug England.
8. Project No. 13351-000..................      9-23-11  Joseph Adamson.\2\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Record of telephone call.
\2\ Teleconference Summary.

    Dated: September 23, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-25053 Filed 9-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: June 4, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 107)]
[Notices]
[Page 31785-31787]
[DOCID:fr04jn10-52]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0421; FRL-8826[dash]1]

Pesticide Products; Registration Applications

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has received applications to register pesticide products
containing Fluxapyroxad, an active ingredient not included in any
previously registered pesticide product. Pursuant to the provisions of
section 3(c)(4) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA), EPA is hereby providing notice of receipt and opportunity
to comment on these applications.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 6, 2010.

ADDRESSES:  Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0421, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours of operation (8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2010-0421. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business

Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or
otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-mail. The
regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means
EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available at http://www.regulations.gov. Although, listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either in the electronic
docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of
operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Olga Odiott, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. Registration Applications

    EPA has received applications to register pesticide products
containing Fluxapyroxad, an active ingredient not included in any
previously registered pesticide product. Pursuant to the provisions of
section 3(c)(4) of FIFRA, EPA is hereby providing notice of receipt and
opportunity to comment on these applications. Notice of receipt of
these applications does not imply a decision by the Agency on these
applications. EPA received the following pesticide registration
applications from BASF Corporation, 26, Davis Drive, P.O. Box 13528,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3528.
    1. File Symbol: 7969-GRE. Product name: Xemium Fungicide Technical.
Active ingredient: Fluxapyroxad at 98.9%. Proposed use: Formulation
into fungicide products.
    2. File Symbol: 7969-GNA. Product name: BAS 700 01 F. Active
ingredient: Fluxapyroxad at 5.96%. Propose uses: Barley, corn, dried
shelled peas and beans, edible podded legumes vegetables, fruiting
vegetables, oat, oilseed crops (including canola, flax, and sunflower),
peanut, pome fruits, rye, soybean, stone fruits, succulent shelled peas
and beans, sugar beet, tuberous and corm vegetables (including potato)
wheat, and triticale.
    3. File Symbol: 7969-GNT Product name: BAS 700 02 F. Active
ingredient: Fluxapyroxad at 28.78%. Proposed uses: Seed treatment use
on barley, corn, cotton, dried shelled peas and beans, edible podded
legume vegetables, oat, peanut, rye, sorghum, soybean, sunflower,
wheat, and triticale seed.
    4. File Symbol: 7969-GNI. Product name: BAS 700 03 F. Active
ingredient: Fluxapyroxad at 28.70%. Proposed uses: Seed treatment use
on barley, corn, cotton, dried shelled peas and beans, edible podded
legume vegetables, oat, peanut, rye, sorghum, soybean, sunflower,
wheat, and triticale seed.
    5. File Symbol: 7969-GNO. Product name: BAS 700 04 F. Active
ingredient: Fluxapyroxad at 26.55%. Proposed uses: Barley, corn, dried
shelled peas and beans, edible podded legumes vegetables, fruiting
vegetables, oat, oilseed crops (including canola, flax,

and sunflower), peanut, pome fruits, rye, soybean, stone fruits,
succulent shelled peas and beans, sugar beet, tuberous and corm
vegetables (including potato), wheat, and triticale.
    6. File Symbol: 7969-GRN. Product name: BAS 703 01 F. Active
ingredient: Fluxapyroxad at 21.26% and Pyraclostrobin at 21.26 %.
Proposed uses: Dried shelled peas and beans, edible podded legumes
vegetables, fruiting vegetables (including tomato), oilseed crops
(including canola, flax, and sunflower), pome fruits, soybean, stone
fruits, succulent shelled peas and beans, and tuberous and corm
vegetables (including potato).
    7. File Symbol: 7969-GRR. Product name: BAS 703 02 F. Active
ingredient: Fluxapyroxad at 14.33% and Pyraclostrobin at 28.58%
Proposed uses: Barley, corn, fruiting vegetables (including tomato),
oat, oilseed crops (including canola, flax, and sunflower), peanut,
rye, soybean, sugar beet, tuberous and corm vegetables, (including
potato), wheat, and triticale.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pest.

    Dated: May 26, 2010.
 Daniel J. Rosenblatt,
 Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010-13358 Filed 6-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


Agricultural Handlers Exposure Task Force Agricultural Handlers Exposure Task Force HSRB Review of Worker Exposure Study Protocols Elliot Gordon Chairman of Administrative Committee June 29, 2006 Agricultural Handlers Exposure Task Force Three Defining Characteristics 1. AHETF monitors workplace exposure under normal agricultural product use conditions, in contrast to clinical toxicology studies.

2. AHETF studies address USEPA, PMRA and Cal DPR regulatory data requirements and utilize consensus derived regulatory exposure monitoring methods and standards.

3. Individual studies are part of an integrated industry task force effort. Agricultural Handlers Exposure Task Force Workplace Exposure Monitoring ° AHETF studies monitor professional farm workers who mix, load, and apply pesticides ( their normal job activities) in standard, agricultural settings at appropriate times during the year.

° Products handled in AHETF studies are widely used USEPA registered products.

° Study participants comply with all product label requirements and the USEPA Worker Protection Standard ( WPS). Agricultural Handlers Exposure Task Force Workplace Exposure Monitoring ° An Institutional Review Board reviews and approves all AHETF protocols prior to initiation of work.

° The informed consent document is issued by the IRB. Agricultural Handlers Exposure Task Force Regulatory Data Requirements and Methods ° AHETF data are generic rather than product specific. These studies are conducted to satisfy USEPA, California ( DPR) and Canadian ( PMRA) occupational exposure data requirements as a replacement for PHED.

° AHETF develops the testing program and protocols in consultation with the Joint Regulatory Committee comprised of USEPA, USDA,

PMRA, Cal DPR, and AHETF.

° AHETF has conducted or initiated 14 exposure studies. In addition,

IRB has reviewed and approved the 5 protocols currently before you. Approximately 40 additional studies will be conducted over the next several years. Agricultural Handlers Exposure Task Force Protocol Review Process Agricultural Handlers Exposure Task Force Regulatory Data Requirements and Methods ° North American regulatory agencies will use the data in risk assessments applicable to crop protection products and uses.

° AHETF studies conform to established Agency and OECD guideline methods and procedures. These have evolved for over 40 years and incorporate advances in both science and ethics. Agricultural Handlers Exposure Task Force Pesticides can be mixed, loaded and applied in numerous ways that account for differences in equipment, product formulations, crops and regions. The Task Force has focused on 33 use scenarios. Agricultural Handlers Exposure Task Force Integrated Task Force Program ° The Task Force's purpose is to develop a comprehensive, integrated database rather than a series of stand alone studies, which PHED reflects.

° Data from multiple studies populate the Task Force database of 33 use scenarios. Agricultural Handlers Exposure Task Force Integrated Task Force Program ° AHETF performs statistical analyses on data within a scenario, not on data from the individual studies that comprise the scenario.

° AHETF uses standardized protocols; they are identical except for study specific work activity,

equipment, location, and timing. Agricultural Handlers Exposure Task Force Summary ° AHETF study schedules are time sensitive and would benefit from an expedited HSRB review.

° AHETF is interested in working with the HSRB and USEPA to develop ways to streamline this new review process.

  e. g., Generalized Study Protocols


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 151 (Friday, August 5, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51813-51815]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18492]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-8185; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-050-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2003-18-
06, for certain Airbus Model A319-131 and -132 airplanes; Model A320-
231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and Model A321-131 and -231 airplanes.
AD 2003-18-06 currently requires installing new anti-swivel plates and
weights on the engine fan cowl door (FCD) latches and a new cowl door
hold-open device. Since we issued AD 2003-18-06, we have received
reports of additional engine FCD in-flight losses, and a new FCD front
latch and keeper assembly has been developed to address this unsafe
condition. This proposed AD would retain the current actions and
require modifying the engine FCDs, installing placards, and re-
identifying the FCDs with the new part numbers. This proposed AD would
also revise the applicability to include all Model A319-131 and -132
airplanes; Model A320-231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and Model A321-131
and -231 airplanes. We are proposing this AD to prevent in-flight loss
of an engine FCD and possible consequent damage to the airplane and
hazards to persons or property on the ground.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 19,
2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44
51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
8185; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-8185;
Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-050-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On August 29, 2003, we issued AD 2003-18-06, Amendment 39-13297 (68
FR 53501, September 11, 2003) (``AD 2003-18-06''). AD 2003-18-06
requires actions intended to address an unsafe condition on certain
Airbus Model A319-131 and -132 airplanes; Model A320-231, -232, and -
233 airplanes; and Model A321-131 and -231 airplanes.
    Since we issued AD 2003-18-06, we have received reports of
additional engine FCD in-flight losses, and a new FCD front latch and
keeper assembly has been developed to address this unsafe condition.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2016-0053, dated March 14, 2016 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus Model
A319-131 and -132; A320-231, -232, and -233; and A321-131 and -231
airplanes. The MCAI states:

    Fan Cowl Door (FCD) losses during take-off were reported on
aeroplanes equipped with IAE V2500 engines. Prompted by these
occurences, [Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile]
DGAC France issued AD 2000-444-156(B), mandating FCD latch
improvements. This [DGAC] AD was later superseded by AD 2001-381(B)
[which corresponds to FAA AD 2003-18-06], requiring installation of
additional fan cowl latch improvement by installing a hold open
device.
    Since that [DGAC] AD was issued, further FCD in flight losses
were experienced in service. Investigations confirmed that in all

cases, the fan cowls were opened prior to the flight and were not
correctly re-secured. During the pre-flight inspection, it was then
not detected that the FCD were not properly latched.
    This condition, if not corrected, could lead to in-flight loss
of a FCD, possibly resulting in damage to the aeroplane and/or
injury to persons on the ground.
    Prompted by these recent events, new FCD front latch and keeper
assembly were developed, having a specific key necessary to un-latch
the FCD. This key cannot be removed unless the FCD front latch is
safely closed. The key, after removal, must be stowed in the flight
deck at a specific location, as instructed in the applicable
Aircraft Maintenance Manual. Applicable Flight Crew Operating Manual
has been amended accordingly. After modification, the FCD is
identified with a different Part Number (P/N).
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of DGAC AD 2001-381(B), which is superseded, and
requires modification and re-identification of FCD.

You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
8185.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A320-71-1069, dated December 18,
2015. The service information describes procedures for modifying the
engine FCDs, installing placards, and re-identifying the FCDs with the
new part numbers. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of these
same type designs.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 558 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    The actions required by AD 2003-18-06, and retained in this
proposed AD, take about 8 work-hours per product, at an average labor
rate of $85 per work-hour. Required parts cost about $1,500 per
product. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the actions that
are required by AD 2003-18-06 is $2,180 per product.
    We also estimate that it would take about 6 work-hours per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $4,813
per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $2,970,234, or $5,323 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2003-18-06, Amendment 39-13297 (68 FR 53501, September 11, 2003), and
adding the following new AD:

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2016-8185; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-
050-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by September 19, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2003-18-06, Amendment 39-13297 (68 FR 53501,
September 11, 2003) (``AD 2003-18-06'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus Model A319-131 and -132 airplanes;
Model A320-231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and Model A321-131 and -
231 airplanes; certificated in any category; all manufacturer serial
numbers.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 71, Powerplant.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of engine fan cowl door (FCD)
in-flight losses. We are issuing this AD to prevent in-flight loss
of an engine FCD and possible consequent damage to the airplane and
hazards to persons or property on the ground.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Modification and/or Installation, With No Changes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (a) of AD
2003-18-06, with no changes. Within 18 months after October 16, 2003
(the effective date of AD 2003-18-06), do the action(s) specified in
paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, as applicable.
    (1) For Configuration 01 airplanes identified in Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-71-1028, dated March 23, 2001: Modify the door latches
of the fan cowl of both engines (i.e., installation of new anti-
swivel plates and weights), and install a new hold-open

device, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-71-1028, dated March 23, 2001.
    (2) For Configuration 02 airplanes identified in Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-71-1028, dated March 23, 2001: Install a new hold-open
device, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-71-1028, dated March 23, 2001.

(h) New Modifications

    Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions required by paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), and (h)(3) of this
AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-71-1069, dated December 18, 2015.
    (1) Modify the left-hand and right-hand FCDs on engines 1 and 2.
    (2) Install a placard on the box located at the bottom of the
120 VU panel or at the bottom of the coat stowage, as applicable.
    (3) Re-identify both engine FCDs with the new part numbers (P/
Ns), as specified in table 1 to paragraph (h) of this AD and table 2
to paragraph (h) of this AD, as applicable.

           Table 1 to Paragraph (h) of This AD--Left-Side Door
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Old part No.                         New part No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
740-4000-501.........................................      740-4000-9501
740-4000-503.........................................      740-4000-9503
745-4000-501.........................................       745-4000-513
745-4000-503.........................................       745-4000-515
745-4000-505.........................................       745-4000-517
------------------------------------------------------------------------

          Table 2 to Paragraph (h) of This AD--Right-Side Door
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Old part No.                         New part No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
740-4000-502.........................................      740-4000-9502
740-4000-504.........................................      740-4000-9504
740-4000-506.........................................      740-4000-9506
740-4000-508.........................................      740-4000-9508
745-4000-502.........................................      745-4000-9502
745-4000-504.........................................      745-4000-9504
745-4000-506.........................................      745-4000-9506
745-4000-508.........................................       745-4000-514
745-4000-510.........................................       745-4000-516
745-4000-512.........................................       745-4000-518
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(i) New Alternative Compliance

    (1) Replacing an engine FCD having a part number listed as ``Old
Part Number'' in table 1 to paragraph (h) of this AD or table 2 to
paragraph (h) of this AD, as applicable, with a FCD having the
corresponding part number listed as ``New Part Number'' in table 1
to paragraph (h) of this AD or table 2 to paragraph (h) of this AD,
as applicable, is an acceptable method of compliance with the
requirements of paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(3) of this AD for that
engine FCD only.
    (2) An airplane on which Airbus Modification 157516 has been
embodied in production is compliant with the requirements of
paragraph (h)(1) and (h)(3) of this AD, provided no engine FCD,
having a part number identified as ``Old Part Number'' in table 1 to
paragraph (h) of this AD or table 2 to paragraph (h) of this AD, as
applicable, is installed on that airplane.
    (3) An airplane on which Airbus Modification 157718 has been
embodied in production is compliant with the requirements of
paragraph (h)(2) of this AD.

(j) New Parts Installation Limitations

    (1) For an airplane with an engine FCD installed having a part
number identified as ``Old Part Number'' in table 1 to paragraph (h)
of this AD or table 2 to paragraph (h) of this AD, as applicable:
After modification of that airplane as required by paragraph (h) of
this AD, do not install an engine FCD, having a part number
identified as ``Old Part Number'' in table 1 to paragraph (h) of
this AD or table 2 to paragraph (h) of this AD, as applicable.
    (2) For an airplane that does not have an engine FCD installed
having a part number identified as ``Old Part Number'' in table 1 to
paragraph (h) of this AD or table 2 to paragraph (h) of this AD, as
applicable: On or after the effective date of this AD, do not
install an engine FCD, having a part number identified as ``Old Part
Number'' in table 1 to paragraph (h) of this AD or table 2 to
paragraph (h) of this AD, as applicable.

(k) New Method of Compliance

    Installation on an engine of a right-hand and left-hand engine
FCD having a part number approved after the effective date of this
AD is a method of compliance with the requirements of paragraphs
(g), (h)(1), and (h)(3) of this AD for that engine only, provided
the part number is approved, and the installation is accomplished,
in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA).

(l) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the International
Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone: 425-227-
1405; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA. If
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by
paragraph (k) of this AD, if any service information contains
procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and
tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests
that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using
accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the
airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any
substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC
require approval of an AMOC.

(m) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2016-0053, dated March 14, 2016,
for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on
the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2016-8185.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 26, 2016.
Victor Wicklund,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.

[FR Doc. 2016-18492 Filed 8-4-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: March 12, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 49)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 13123-13124]
[DOCID:fr12mr08-22]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 111

[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0152] (formerly Docket No. 1996N-0417)
RIN 0910-AB88

Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Packaging,
Labeling, or Holding Operations for Dietary Supplements; Technical
Amendment

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a final
rule that appeared in the Federal Register of June 25, 2007 (72 FR
34752). The final rule established current good manufacturing practice
(CGMP) requirements in manufacturing, packaging, labeling, or holding
operations for dietary supplements. The final rule was published with
an inadvertent error in the codified section. This document corrects
that error. This action is being taken to improve the accuracy of the
agency's regulations.

DATES: This rule is effective March 12, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vasilios H. Frankos, Center for Food

Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-810), Food and Drug Administration,
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of June 25, 2007 (72
FR 34752), FDA established CGMP requirements in manufacturing,
packaging, labeling, or holding operations for dietary supplements. The
preamble of that final rule discusses the requirements of Sec.
111.27(b) (21 CFR 111.27(b)) for a person subject to the rule to
calibrate instruments and controls used in manufacturing or testing a
component or dietary supplement both before and after first use (72 FR
34752 at 34824).
    The provisions regarding calibration of such instruments and
controls, both before and after first use, also appeared in both the
preamble and codified sections of the proposed rule (proposed 21 CFR
111.25(b)) (68 FR 12157 at 12191 and 12255, March 13, 2003). Due to an
inadvertent error, the codified section of the final rule omitted the
word ``and'' between Sec.  111.27(b)(1) and (b)(2) (72 FR 34752 at
34947). Consequently, it is less clear that calibration must be carried
out both before and after first use, as intended. This document
corrects that error, by inserting the word ``and'' at the end of Sec.
111.27(b)(1) so that Sec.  111.27(b)(1) and (b)(2) are read together as
one requirement.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 111

    Dietary foods, Drugs, Foods, Packaging and containers.

0
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under the
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
111 is amended as follows:

PART 111--CURRENT GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE IN MANUFACTURING,
PACKAGING, LABELING, OR HOLDING OPERATIONS FOR DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS

0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 111 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 342, 343, 371, 374, 381, 393; 42
U.S.C. 264.

0
2. Revise Sec.  111.27(b)(1) to read as follows:

Sec.  111.27  What requirements apply to the equipment and utensils
that you use?

* * * * *
    (b)(1) Before first use; and
* * * * *

    Dated: March 5, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-4870 Filed 3-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


[Federal Register: September 21, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 183)]
[Notices]
[Page 54033-54034]
[DOCID:fr21se07-85]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0065; FRL-8471-6]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Application Requirements for the
Approval and Delegation of Federal Air Toxics Programs to State,
Territorial, Local, and Tribal Agencies; EPA ICR No. 1643.06, OMB
Control No. 2060-0264

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information
Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an
existing approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below,
describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated
burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before October 22,
2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OAR-2004-0065, to EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), or by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail

to: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC),
Air and

Radiation Docket and Information Center, MC 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460 (please include a total of two
copies), and (2) OMB at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA,
725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Whitlow, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards (OAQPS)/OID, Environmental Protection Agency,
mail code MC304-03, Research Triangle Park (RTP), NC 27711; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On April 27, 2007 (72 FR 21003), EPA sought comments on this
ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any
additional comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB
within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0065, which is available either electronically at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in hard copy at the Air and Radiation Docket

and Information Center, EPA Docket Center, Room Number 3334 in the EPA
West Building, located at 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC.
The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern
Standard Time (EST), Monday through Friday , excluding Federal
holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>,
and the telephone number for the Air and Radiation Docket is (202) 566-
1742.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at
http://www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index

listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in
the docket that are available electronically. Once in the system,
select ``search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified above.
Please note that EPA's policy is that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public
viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as EPA received them and without change,

unless the comment contains copyrighted material, Confidential Business
Information (CBI), or other information whose public disclosure is
restricted by statute. For further information about the electronic
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov.

    Title: Application Requirements for the Approval and Delegation of
Federal Air Toxics Programs to State, Territorial, Local, and Tribal
Agencies.
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1643.06, OMB Control No. 2060-0264.
    ICR status: This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on September
30, 2007. Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or
sponsor the collection of information while this submission is pending
at OMB. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal
Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed
either by publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate
means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if
applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA
regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: This information collection is an application from State,
territorial, local, or tribal agencies (S/L/Ts) for delegation of
regulations developed under section 112 of the Clean Air Act (Act). The
five options for delegation are straight delegation, rule adjustment,
rule substitution, equivalency by permit, or state program approval.
The information is needed and used to determine if the entity
submitting an application has met the criteria established in the
subpart E rule, codified as 40 CFR part 63, subpart E, in accordance
with section 112(l) of the Act. This information is necessary and
required for the Administrator to determine the acceptability of
approving the S/L/T's rules, requirements or programs in lieu of the
Federal section 112 rules or programs. Additionally, it is also
necessary for the proper performance of our function, and will be used
to ensure that the subpart E approval criteria have been met. The
collection of information is authorized under 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
    Burden Statement: We estimate the annual public reporting and
recordkeeping burden for this collection of information to average
about 507 hours per S/L/T and 41 hours per application. Burden means
the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review
instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and
systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and
providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and requirements which have
subsequently changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a
collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the
collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: State, territorial, local, or tribal
agencies.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 124 S/L/Ts for maximum achievable
control technology standards and 99 S/L/Ts for area source standards
per year.
    Frequency of Response: Occasionally, one time per delegation
request.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 62,844.
    Estimated Total Annual: $3,012,600. This includes an estimated
labor burden cost of $2,959,000 and an estimated cost of $53,600 for
operation and maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimate: There is an increase of 21,267 hours in
the total estimated respondent annual burden compared with that
identified in the ICR currently approved by OMB.
    This increase reflects the increase in number of delegation
applications related to the number of standards delegated and a change
in the distribution of S/L/Ts using each option.

    Dated: September 13, 2007.
Sara Hisel-McCoy,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E7-18682 Filed 9-20-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1063-1064]
[FR Doc No: 2023-00060]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP23-33-000]

Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice of Request Under Blanket
Authorization and Establishing Intervention and Protest Deadline

    Take notice that on December 21, 2022, Columbia Gas Transmission,
LLC (Columbia), 700 Louisiana Street, Suite 1300, Houston, Texas 77002-
2700, filed in the above referenced docket a prior notice request
pursuant to sections 157.205 and 157.213(b) of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission's regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and
Columbia's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP83-76-000.
Columbia is requesting authorization to construct and operate one new
injection/withdrawal storage well, related storage field pipeline and
appurtenances, and relocate an existing storage field pipeline, located
in the Ripley Storage Field in Jackson County, West Virginia. The
estimated cost for the project is approximately $11.5 million, all as
more fully set forth in the request which is on file with the
Commission and open to public inspection.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (www.ferc.gov) using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions concerning this application should be directed to
David A. Alonzo, Manager, Project Authorizations, Columbia Gas
Transmission, LLC, 700 Louisiana Street, Suite 1300, Houston, Texas
77002-2700, phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email: [email protected].

Public Participation

    There are three ways to become involved in the Commission's review
of this project: you can file a protest to the project, you can file a
motion to intervene in the proceeding, and you can file comments on the
project. There is no fee or cost for filing protests, motions to
intervene, or comments. The deadline for filing protests, motions to
intervene, and comments is 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 28, 2023.
How to file protests, motions to intervene, and comments is explained
below.

Protests

    Pursuant to section 157.205 of the Commission's regulations under
the NGA,\1\ any person \2\ or the Commission's staff may file a protest
to the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed or if a
protest is filed and then withdrawn within 30 days after the allowed
time for filing a protest, the proposed activity shall be deemed to be
authorized effective the day after the time allowed for protest. If a
protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time
allowed for filing a protest, the instant request for authorization
will be considered by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 157.205.
    \2\ Persons include individuals, organizations, businesses,
municipalities, and other entities. 18 CFR 385.102(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Protests must comply with the requirements specified in section
157.205(e) of the Commission's regulations,\3\ and must be submitted by
the protest deadline, which is February 28, 2023. A protest may also
serve as a motion to intervene so long as the protestor states it also
seeks to be an intervenor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 18 CFR 157.205(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Interventions

    Any person has the option to file a motion to intervene in this
proceeding. Only intervenors have the right to request rehearing of
Commission orders issued in this proceeding and to subsequently
challenge the Commission's orders in the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal.
    To intervene, you must submit a motion to intervene to the
Commission in accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure \4\ and the regulations under the NGA \5\ by the
intervention deadline for the project, which is February 28, 2023. As
described further in Rule 214, your motion to intervene must state, to

the extent known, your position regarding the proceeding, as well as
your interest in the proceeding. For an individual, this could include
your status as a landowner, ratepayer, resident of an impacted
community, or recreationist. You do not need to have property directly
impacted by the project in order to intervene. For more information
about motions to intervene, refer to the FERC website at https://www.ferc.gov/resources/guides/how-to/intervene.asp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 18 CFR 385.214.
    \5\ 18 CFR 157.10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    All timely, unopposed motions to intervene are automatically
granted by operation of Rule 214(c)(1). Motions to intervene that are
filed after the intervention deadline are untimely and may be denied.
Any late-filed motion to intervene must show good cause for being late
and must explain why the time limitation should be waived and provide
justification by reference to factors set forth in Rule 214(d) of the
Commission's Rules and Regulations. A person obtaining party status
will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary of the
Commission and will receive copies (paper or electronic) of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties.

Comments

    Any person wishing to comment on the project may do so. The
Commission considers all comments received about the project in
determining the appropriate action to be taken. To ensure that your
comments are timely and properly recorded, please submit your comments
on or before February 28, 2023. The filing of a comment alone will not
serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. To become a party,
you must intervene in the proceeding.

How To File Protests, Interventions, and Comments

    There are two ways to submit protests, motions to intervene, and
comments. In both instances, please reference the Project docket number
CP23-33-000 in your submission.
    (1) You may file your protest, motion to intervene, and comments by
using the Commission's eFiling feature, which is located on the
Commission's website (www.ferc.gov) under the link to Documents and
Filings. New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking on
``eRegister.'' You will be asked to select the type of filing you are
making; first select General'' and then select ``Protest'',
``Intervention'', or ``Comment on a Filing''; or \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Additionally, you may file your comments electronically by
using the eComment feature, which is located on the Commission's
website at www.ferc.gov under the link to Documents and Filings.
Using eComment is an easy method for interested persons to submit
brief, text-only comments on a project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (2) You can file a paper copy of your submission by mailing it to
the address below. Your submission must reference the Project docket
number CP23-33-000.

To file via USPS: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426
To file via any other method: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland
20852

    The Commission encourages electronic filing of submissions (option
1 above) and has eFiling staff available to assist you at (202) 502-
8258 or [email protected]
    Protests and motions to intervene must be served on the applicant
either by mail or email (with a link to the document) at: Columbia Gas
Transmission, LLC, 700 Louisiana Street, Suite 1300, Houston, Texas
77002-2700 or [email protected]. Any subsequent submissions by
an intervenor must be served on the applicant and all other parties to
the proceeding. Contact information for parties can be downloaded from
the service list at the eService link on FERC Online.

Tracking the Proceeding

    Throughout the proceeding, additional information about the project
will be available from the Commission's Office of External Affairs, at
(866) 208-FERC, or on the FERC website at www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link as described above. The eLibrary link also provides
access to the texts of all formal documents issued by the Commission,
such as orders, notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. For more information and to register, go to
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.

    Dated: December 30, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-00060 Filed 1-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 20, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 202)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 64673]
[DOCID:fr20oc10-10]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2010-0824]

Safety Zone, Brandon Road Lock and, Dam to Lake Michigan
Including Des Plaines River, Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, Chicago
River, and Calumet-Saganashkee Channel, Chicago, IL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce a segment of the Safety Zone,
Brandon Road Lock and Dam to Lake Michigan including Des Plaines River,
Chicago Ship and Sanitary Canal, Chicago River, Calumet-Saganashkee
Channel on all waters of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal from Mile
Marker 296.1 to Mile Marker 296.7 from 6 a.m. on October 4, 2010
through 6 p.m. on October 11, 2010 and from 6 a.m. on November 3, 2010
through 6 p.m. on November 5, 2010. This action is necessary to protect
the waterways, waterway users and vessels from hazards associated with
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' installation of parasitic structures
which will help control the spread of aquatic nuisance species that
might devastate the waters in the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal.
    During the enforcement period, entry into, transiting, mooring,
laying-up or anchoring within the enforced area of this safety zone by
any person or vessel is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her designated
representative.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.T09-0166 will be enforced daily
from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on October 4, 2010 to October 11, 2010 and daily
from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on November 3, 2010 to November 5, 2010. This
rule is effective with actual notice for purposes of enforcement at 6
a.m. on October 4, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice,
call or e-mail CDR Tim Cummins, Deputy Prevention Division, Ninth Coast
Guard District, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail address
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce Safety Zone,
Brandon Road Lock and Dam to Lake Michigan including Des Plaines River,
Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, Chicago River, Calumet-Saganashkee
Channel, Chicago, IL listed in 33 CFR 165.T09-0166(a)(2), on all waters
of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal from Mile Marker 296.1 to Mile
Marker 296.7 daily from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on October 4, 2010 to October
11, 2010 and daily from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on November 3, 2010 to
November 5, 2010.
    This enforcement action is necessary because the Captain of the
Port, Sector Lake Michigan has determined that the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers' installation operation poses risks to life and property.
Specifically, there will be congested waterways and construction
operations requiring the use of divers taking place in the vicinity of
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' electric dispersal barrier. The
combination of vessel traffic, divers, and electric current in the
water makes the control of vessels through the impacted portion of the
Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal necessary to prevent injury and
property loss.
    In accordance with the general regulations in Sec.  165.23 of this
part, entry into, transiting, mooring, laying up, or anchoring within
the enforced area of this safety zone by any person or vessel is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, or his or her designated representative.
    This notice is issued under authority of 33 CFR 165.T09-0166 and 5
U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this notice in the Federal Register, the
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, will also provide notice
through other means, which may include but are not limited to Broadcast
Notice to Mariners, Local Notice to Mariners, local news media,
distribution in leaflet form, and on-scene oral notice. Additionally,
the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, may notify
representatives from the maritime industry through telephonic and e-
mail notifications.

    Dated: September 24, 2010.
L. Barndt,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2010-26379 Filed 10-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P