[Federal Register: November 16, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 221)]
[Notices]
[Page 66760-66761]
[DOCID:fr16no06-52]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER06-1502-000, ER06-1502-000]

Round Rock Energy, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

November 8, 2006.
    Round Rock Energy, LLC (Round Rock) filed an application for
market-based rate authority, with an accompanying rate schedule. The
proposed market-based rate schedule provides for the sale of energy,
capacity and ancillary services at market-based rates. Round Rock also
requested waivers of various Commission regulations. In particular,
Round Rock requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under
18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability by Round Rock.
    On November 6, 2006, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director,
Division of Tariffs and Market Development--West, granted the requests
for blanket approval under Part 34. The Director's order also stated
that the Commission would publish a separate notice in the Federal
Register establishing a period of time for the filing of protests.
Accordingly, any person desiring to be heard or to protest the blanket
approvals of issuances of securities or assumptions of liability by
Round Rock should file a motion to

intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. 18 CFR
385.211, 385.214 (2004).
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to
intervene or protest is December 6, 2006.
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition by the deadline above,
Round Rock is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or
liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect
of any security of another person; provided that such issuance or
assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of
Round Rock, compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably
necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by
continued approvals of Round Rock's issuance of securities or
assumptions of liability.
    Copies of the full text of the Director's Order are available from
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary link. Enter the

docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
filed to access the document. Comments, protests, and interventions may
be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-19326 Filed 11-15-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: June 30, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 125)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 37722]
[DOCID:fr30jn10-7]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2010-0476]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; July Fireworks Display in Captain of the Port, Puget
Sound AOR

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is correcting a temporary final rule that
appeared in the Federal Register on June 15, 2010 (75 FR 33696). The
temporary final rule established a temporary safety zone on the waters
of Port Gardner Bay, Washington in support of the City of Everett
Fourth of July fireworks display and this correction reflects the
correct positioning of the display. The safety zone is necessary to
protect the maritime public from dangers associated with the fireworks
display and will do so by restricting vessels from congregating in
close proximity to the fireworks discharge site during the display.
Entry into, transit through or mooring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or Designated
Representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 5 p.m. on July 4, 2010 until 1 a.m.
on July 5, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail LTJG Ashley M. Wanzer, Sector Seattle
Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR doc 2010-14294 appearing on page 33696
in the issue of Tuesday, June 15, 2010, the following corrections are
made:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

Sec.  165.T13-147  [Corrected]

0
1. On page 33698, in the first column, in Sec.  165.T13-147 Safety
Zone; July Fireworks Display in Captain of the Port, Puget Sound AOR,
correct paragraph (a) to read as follows:
    ``(a) Safety Zone. The following area is a designated safety zone:
all waters of Port Gardner Bay, WA extending out to a 300 yard radius
from the launch site at 47[deg]58'51'' N., 122[deg]13'16'' W.'' is
corrected to read ``Safety Zone. The following area is a designated
safety zone: All waters of Port Gardner Bay, WA between two lines with
the northern line connecting the following points 48[deg]01'10.83'' N.,
122[deg]13'1.16'' W. and 48[deg]01'5.05'' N., 122[deg]12'50.84'' W. and
the southern line connecting the following points 48[deg]01'19.42'' N.,
122[deg]13'38.79'' W. and 48[deg]0'18.77'' N., 122[deg]13'19.00'' W.''

    Dated: June 16, 2010.
S.W. Bornemann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2010-15843 Filed 6-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 Supporting Statement for a Request for OMB Review
under

The Paperwork Reduction Act

1	IDENTIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION

1(a)	Title and Number of the Information Collection

	Title:	Reporting Requirements under EPA’s Safer Detergent Stewardship
Initiative (SDSI) Program

		EPA ICR No.: TBD.01	OMB Control No.: 2070-TBD

1(b)	Short Characterization

EPA is developing the SDSI to recognize environmental leaders who
voluntarily commit to the use of safer surfactants.  Leading chemical
manufacturers have made great progress in developing safer, highly
effective surfactants.  As a result, some leading U.S. corporations that
formulate products with surfactants, such as cleaning products, have
been able to act in advance of SDSI to use safer surfactants in their
product lines.  Stakeholders who have reformulated products using safer
surfactants have called the change cost-neutral.  SDSI would encourage a
shift to safer surfactants by companies unaware of the benefits of such
a change.  SDSI would also attract companies that see value in the
public recognition of corporate product stewardship that SDSI will
provide.

Surfactants are used in a wide variety of applications and products.
Examples include detergents, cleaners, airplane deicers, and
fire-fighting foams.  Products such as paint and ink that also use
surfactants were not included in the scope of SDSI based on
recommendations from industry, environmental groups, and others.
Stakeholders suggested that EPA could drive the most significant
environmental improvement at the lowest possible cost by focusing SDSI
on encouraging safer surfactants for products whose use routinely
results in their discharge to the environment.  Safer surfactants are
surfactants that break down quickly to non-polluting compounds.
Nonylphenol ethoxylates, commonly referred to as NPEs, are an example of
a surfactant class that does not meet this definition.  Both NPEs and
their breakdown products, such as nonylphenol, are toxic to aquatic
life.

EPA published the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for
Nonylphenol in the Federal Register in February 2006. The Safer
Detergents Stewardship Initiative will complement EPA’s Aquatic Life
Criteria, by encouraging the manufacture and use of safer surfactants,
thus reducing the amount of nonylphenol ethoxylate surfactants and
nonylphenol in streams and other water bodies.  The Design for the
Environment (DfE) program has identified safer alternatives to NPE
surfactants through its partnership work with industry and environmental
advocates; many are comparable in cost and are readily available.

There are two categories for recognition under SDSI: Champion and
Partner. Champion is the highest level of recognition offered under
SDSI.  At this level, the participant is invited to the SDSI Awards
ceremony, is listed on the EPA SDSI Web site as a Champion, and may use
a special logo in their literature to help explain their participation
in the program.  The Partner category provides recognition of
significant accomplishment towards the use of safer surfactants.
Partners will be listed on the EPA SDSI Web site and may be granted
recognition as a Champion in the future, if appropriate.

Both Champions and Partners will receive a certificate of recognition
from DfE.  To be eligible for the awards ceremony, which will be held in
the summer of 2008, candidates for Champion status should submit their
application by December 31, 2007.  The application for participating in
SDSI will be available on the SDSI Web page in the fall of 2007.

EPA will also specify the following general requirements:

Candidates should post a statement on their Web site describing the
actions that qualify them for recognition under SDSI; and

Candidates should complete an application and have it signed by a
company authority (e.g., Chief Executive Officer, or vice president with
responsibility for product formulation).  The application would describe
the actions taken to qualify for recognition.

EPA will use available information resources to track the progress of
the program, both in terms of the level of participation and expected
environmental benefits.  A cleaning industry trade association plans to
apply for recognition as a Champion under SDSI.  In order to qualify for
this level of recognition, the association plans to monitor the number
of its product manufacturer members participating in SDSI and to
correlate this number to an approximate percentage of the industry as a
whole.  For environmental benefits, EPA will use its own Inventory
Update Rule to establish a baseline and track changes in the levels of
nonylphenol ethoxylate manufactured, imported and used in the U.S.  EPA
may also make use of ongoing studies that monitor the level of
contaminants, like nonylphenol, in various water bodies and sediment.
EPA will review information sources for endpoints such as level of
program participation, trends in surfactant use, and levels of toxic
surfactant degradates in waters and sediment.  EPA will evaluate whether
there is a correlation between SDSI participation and environmental
outcomes.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 2.	NEED FOR AND USE OF THE COLLECTION

	2(a)	Need/Authority for the Collection

Authority for SDSI derives from two statutory sources.  Section
6604(b)(5) of the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA, 42 U.S.C. 13103(b)(5);
see Attachment A) directs EPA to facilitate the adoption of
source-reduction techniques by businesses.  Section 6604(b)(13) directs
EPA to establish an annual awards program to recognize a company or
companies that operate outstanding or innovative source reduction
programs.  In recognition of these directives, and through consultation
with a broad range of stakeholders, EPA developed SDSI.  In addition,
the SDSI Program complements the Aquatic Life Criteria for Nonylphenol
issued under authority of Section 304(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act on
February 23, 2006.

SDSI’s information collection activities will assist the Agency in
meeting the goals of the PPA by providing resources and recognition for
businesses committed to promoting and using safer surfactants.  In turn,
SDSI will help businesses meet their corporate sustainability goals by
providing the means to, and an objective measure of, environmental
stewardship. Investment analysts and advisers seek these types of
measures in evaluating a corporation’s sustainability profile and
investment worthiness.  It is not surprising then that EPA has heard
from many organizations that the SDSI Program will be an important
impetus for prioritizing and completing the transition to safer
surfactants.  SDSI is also needed to promote greater use of safer
surfactants by companies unaware of the benefits of such a change.

EPA has carefully tailored its request for information, and especially
the SDSI Application Form, to ensure that it only asks for information
essential to verifying an applicants’ eligibility for award or
recognition.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 	2(b)	Practical Utility/Users of the Data

The information collected by the SDSI Program is not designed or
intended to support regulatory decision-making by EPA. EPA uses the
information collected in the SDSI Application Form to: (1) identify the
candidate’s commitment to promoting and using safer surfactants; (2)
verify the candidate’s involvement in promoting and using safer
surfactants; and (3) determine the candidate’s eligibility for award
or recognition under SDSI.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 3.     	NON-DUPLICATION, CONSULTATIONS, AND OTHER
COLLECTION

        	CRITERIA

	3(a)	Non-Duplication

Respondents will not be asked to provide information that has been or is
currently being collected by EPA, other federal or state agencies or
proprietary sources. The information collected by the SDSI Program is
unique and is not duplicative of previous information collection
requests.  As due diligence, EPA also checked with trade associations
and potential partners to confirm that the information being collected
by the SDSI Program does not exist elsewhere.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 	3(b)	Public Notice Required Prior to ICR
Submission to OMB

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1  Prior to submission to OMB, this ICR will be made
available to the public for comment through a Federal Register notice.
The public will have 60 days to provide comments.  Any comments received
will be given consideration when completing the supporting statement
that is submitted to OMB.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 	3(c)	Consultations

Although the recognition program covered by this ICR has not started,
EPA announced its intentions to develop the SDSI Program in February
2006.  Since that time, EPA has received significant feedback on the
SDSI Program from stakeholders.  EPA continues to work closely with
stakeholders that include surfactant manufacturers, cleaning product
formulators, environmentalists, water treatment facilities, and cleaning
industry trade associations.

On June 12, 2006, DfE held a public meeting to take comments on SDSI.
Ephraim King (Director of EPA’s Office of Science and Technology in
the Office of Water) and Charlie Auer (Director of EPA’s Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics in the Office of Prevention, Pesticides,
and Toxic Substances) provided overviews of EPA’s Aquatic Life
Criteria for Nonylphenol and SDSI.  A clear majority of stakeholders
representing a broad range of interests – surfactant manufacturers,
cleaning product formulators, environmentalists, a water treatment
facility, and a cleaning industry trade association – expressed strong
support for SDSI.  Following is a list of the stakeholders who spoke to
express support for the program at the public meeting:

Paul Anastas, Green Chemistry Institute

Bill Balek, ISSA

Bill Greggs, Procter & Gamble

Cory Hammock, Clean Control

Marsha Hardin, Reckitt Benckiser

Lauren Heine, GreenBlue

Ed Hopkins, Sierra Club

Jennifer Jackson, East Bay Municipal Utility District

Jack Linard, Unilever

Rich Liroff, World Wildlife Fund

David Long, SC Johnson

Roger McFadden, Coastwide Chemicals

Sam Moore, Burlington Chemical

A minority of stakeholders, representing the Alkylphenol Ethoxylate
Research Council (APERC), alkylphenol ethoxylate (APE) and alkylphenol
(AP) manufacturers, and two laundry trade associations (large APE
users), expressed concerns about SDSI.  Their concerns are summarized in
the June 12 public meeting notes published in the Federal Register (see
http://www.regulations.gov, document number: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0343-0002,
docket number: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0343).  EPA has taken steps to
ameliorate these concerns. These include (1) clarifying that the intent
of the program is to encourage the use of safer surfactants; the use of
any surfactants (not solely NPE surfactants) that degrade to long-lived
and more toxic degradates would disqualify an applicant from
recognition; (2) requiring that a company eligible for recognition have
a product stewardship strategy to ensure the use of safer surfactants;
and (3) limiting the scope of the program to those products whose use
routinely results in their discharge to the environment; products such
as ink, paint, and oil are not included.

Specifically regarding this ICR, EPA consulted with the following
potential respondents to obtain feedback on the need for the collection,
the reasonableness of the burden estimates, and alternative approaches
to collecting the information:

Bill Balek, ISSA (a trade association for the cleaning industry),
1-800-225-4772

John Barrett, KIMCO Corporation,<PHONE_NUMBER>

Carol Chapin, Simple Green,<PHONE_NUMBER>

Cory Hammock, Clean Control,<PHONE_NUMBER>

Robert Israel, JohnsonDiversey,<PHONE_NUMBER>

Roger McFadden, Coastwide Laboratories,<PHONE_NUMBER>

Candice Rushton, Betco,<PHONE_NUMBER>

Barbara Whitstone, CleanPower,<PHONE_NUMBER>

In general, the individuals were supportive of the ICR and said the
burden estimates appeared reasonable.  Therefore, EPA made no changes to
the information in this supporting statement.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 	3(d)	Effects of Less Frequent Collection

The SDSI Application Form is designed to be a one-time information
submission for organizations that wish to participate in the SDSI
Program as either a Partner or Champion.  In some instances, an
organization that applies for Partner recognition may choose to re-apply
at a later date for Champion recognition.  Without this information, EPA
will not be able to effectively determine whether companies are
switching to safer surfactants nor recognize companies who successfully
transition to safer surfactants.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 	3(e)	General Guidelines

The information collection activities discussed in this renewal ICR
comply with all regulatory guidelines under 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 	3(f)	Confidentiality

No information collected by EPA under SDSI comprises confidential
business information.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 	3(g)	Sensitive Questions

The information collection activities discussed in this document do not
involve any sensitive questions.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 4.	THE RESPONDENTS AND THE INFORMATION REQUESTED

	4(a)	Respondents and NAICS Codes

SDSI seeks partners from establishments engaged in the production or use
of surfactants, as well as establishments involved in the purchasing,
distribution or use of products containing surfactants, whose use
routinely results in their discharge to the environment.  Others (e.g.,
non-profit organizations, unions, academia) may also qualify through
active encouragement of the use of safer surfactants.

Below is a list of North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)
codes and associated industries that may be affected by information
collection requirements covered under this ICR.  This list is intended
to be illustrative; entities from other industries may elect to apply
for recognition through SDSI.  However, EPA expects that most
applications will come from the following industries:

NAICS Code	Affected Industry

3256	Soap, Cleaning Compound, and Toilet Preparation Manufacturing

424490	Other Grocery and Related Products Merchant Wholesalers

424690	Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers

424990	Other Miscellaneous Nondurable Goods Merchant Wholesalers

4451	Grocery Stores

481	Air Transportation

561210	Facilities Support Services

561720	Janitorial Services

561740	Carpet and Upholstery Cleaning Services

611310	Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools

7211	Traveler Accommodation

8123	Drycleaning and Laundry Services

	4(b)	Information Requested

Once a prospective organization reviews the SDSI materials and decides
to apply, it should submit a SDSI Application Form (see Attachment B for
complete form).  Applications will be received on an ongoing basis over
the three years covered by this ICR.  However, to be eligible for the
awards ceremony, which will be held in the summer of 2008, candidates
should submit their application by December 31, 2007.  Only candidates
for recognition at the champion level are eligible for the awards
ceremony.

All forms will be available in hard copy or electronic form.
Participants can use the hard copy forms they receive from EPA by mail
or download PDF versions of the forms from the SDSI Web site.

Data items:

The reporting items include:

Facility name and Web site URL;

Name, title, address, phone number, fax number, and e-mail address of
the candidate’s primary contact person;

Status (partner or champion) for which the candidate is applying;

Type of organization (e.g. manufacturing, purchasing, retail);

Description of facility and any relevant affiliations;

Descriptions of actions taken to qualify for recognition;

Relevant supporting documentation showing one or more of the following
(requirements vary by organization type / recognition level): evidence
of a full or intended transition to safer surfactants; a strategy to
ensure that only safer surfactants are used or purchased by specified
dates; a written commitment to a full transition to safer surfactants
within a specific time period; activities taken to date to promote the
use of safer surfactants

Where applicable, total production or use volume of surfactants

Signature, name, and title of senior company authority (e.g., CEO, or
vice president for health and environment).

Respondent activities:

Candidates conduct the following activities in order to complete and
submit the SDSI Application Form:

Review the SDSI information;

Decide whether to apply for recognition, and whether to apply for
partner or champion status;

Select a primary contact person for the program;

Complete the SDSI Application Form, including obtaining the signature of
a company authority (e.g., CEO or vice president for health and
environment);

Describe how their organization meets the evaluation criteria for the
relevant recognition;

Fax or mail the form to EPA;

Provide relevant documentation to EPA upon request.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 5.      	THE INFORMATION COLLECTED – AGENCY
ACTIVITIES, COLLECTION METHODOLOGY, AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

5(a)	Agency Activities

Under SDSI, EPA engages in the following activities related to the SDSI
Application Form:

Distribute the SDSI Application Form to potential participants, and
maintain a downloadable PDF version on the SDSI Web site;

Answer questions posed by potential applicants regarding recognition
under the Initiative;

Receive the completed forms, review for accuracy, and place any
necessary follow-up calls; and

Approve candidates for recognition and notify both successful and
unsuccessful applicants of the decisions.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 	5(b)	Collection Methodology and Management

Respondents will be able to obtain the SDSI Application Form in hard
copy from EPA or by downloading it from the SDSI Web site.  The
completed forms can be faxed or mailed to EPA.

In collecting and analyzing the information associated with this ICR,
EPA will use a telephone system, personal computers, and applicable
database software.  EPA will ensure the accuracy and completeness of
collected information by reserving the right to request the list of
ingredients (e.g., bills of lading, invoices) or other relevant
documentation at any time to confirm that candidates have the achieved
the criteria for recognition.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 	5(c)	Small Entity Flexibility

EPA expects that some of the participants in the SDSI program will be
small entities. EPA has designed its application form to minimize
respondent burden while obtaining sufficient and accurate information.
In addition, given the voluntary nature of the collection, EPA expects
that respondents will participate only if the benefits of participation
outweigh the information collection burden.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 	5(d)	Collection Schedule

Organizations may submit a one-time application for recognition as
Partners or Champions at any time.  To be eligible for the awards
ceremony, which will be held in the summer of 2008, candidates for
Champion status should submit their application by December 31, 2007.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 6.	ESTIMATING THE BURDEN AND COST OF THE
COLLECTION

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 Exhibit 6.1 presents the estimated burden hours
and costs for all respondents during each of the three years covered
under this ICR.

The data collection mechanism for SDSI is the SDSI Application Form.  In
an effort to minimize burden and cost, the SDSI Application Form was
designed to contain straightforward questions.  It was also designed in
a way that one application package will serve all types of participants.
 The expected participant categories for SDSI are as follows:  chemical
manufacturers, formulators, retailers / distributors, institutional
purchasers, and “others” (e.g., non-profits, unions, and academia).
Within these participant categories, it is expected that the chemical
manufacturers, formulators, retailers / distributors, and institutional
purchasers will be private sector institutions.  Within the participant
category “others,” about ten local governments (e.g., municipal
water supply systems) are likely to participate, with the remaining
participants being private sector institutions.

	6(a)	Estimating Respondent Burden

The average respondent burden is estimated to be 10 hours for all
participant types (see Exhibit 6.1).  EPA used professional judgment to
arrive at a burden estimate and then consulted representatives from the
participant categories to make sure the burden estimate was reasonable
(see section 3(c)).  Burden hours for the SDSI application package are
for reporting purposes only.

We expect that for a typical entity, program and application review will
take about one hour (technical staff).  Obtaining approval, which is
likely to involve verifying assumptions with staff and ensuring support
from multiple levels of management, will take about three hours (1
managerial, 1 technical, 1 clerical).  Completing the application form
will take about 6 hours (5 technical, 1 clerical) given the data
reporting requirements (see SDSI Application Form, Attachment B).
Included in this estimate of 6 hours is the potential burden that would
be incurred if EPA finds it necessary to verify the information in the
application.  the purposes of the burden estimate, EPA assumes that it
will need to verify information from one organization in each
participant category.  This burden, when distributed among all
participants, is about 32 minutes per participant ((40 hrs x 5
participants) / 375 total participants).

	6(b)	Estimating Respondent Costs

EPA estimates an average hourly labor rate (base hourly rate plus fringe
and overhead) of $64 for managerial staff, $53 for technical staff, and
$26 for clerical staff.  These three labor rate estimates are taken from
manufacturing industry data in “Economic Analysis of Expedited
Significant New Use Rules for 66 Chemical Substances,” 12/06, p. B-4
(EPA Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2003-0063).  The type of staff needed to
complete the SDSI Application Form and their associated hourly labor
rates were verified by contacting representatives from the participant
categories.

In exhibit 6.1 we show the breakdown of burden costs, assuming 10 hours
for all participant categories.  No capital or operations and management
costs are incurred by respondents under this ICR, with the possible
exception of postage and photocopy costs.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 Exhibit 6.1.  Estimated Burden and Costs to
Respondents

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 Type of Affected Public	Collection activity

Estimated response time (hours)	Total burden (hours)	Hourly labor cost
Total cost

	M	T 	C	M	T 	C	Total 	M	T 	C

	Private Sector	Chemical Manufacturers	37

	Review application and program information

0	1	0	0	37	0	37	$64	$53	$26	$1,961

	Obtain senior approval

1	1	1	37	37	37	111	$64	$53	$26	$5,291

	Complete and submit package

0	5	1	0	185	37	222	$64	$53	$26	$10,767

	Subtotal	37	1	7	2	37	259	74	370	--	--	--	$18,019

	Formulators	206

	Review application and program information

0	1	0	0	206	0	206	$64	$53	$26	$10,918

	Obtain senior approval

1	1	1	206	206	206	618	$64	$53	$26	$29,458

	Complete and submit package1

0	5	1	0	1030	206	1236	$64	$53	$26	$59,946

	Subtotal	206	1	7	2	206	1442	412	2060	--	--	--	$100,322

	Retailers / Distributors	23

	Review application and program information

0	1	0	0	23	0	23	$64	$53	$26	$1,219

	Obtain senior approval

1	1	1	23	23	23	69	$64	$53	$26	$3,289

	Complete and submit package1

0	5	1	0	115	23	138	$64	$53	$26	$6,693

	Subtotal	23	1	7	2	23	161	46	230	--	--	--	$11,201

	Institutional Purchasers	23

	Review application and program information

0	1	0	0	23	0	23	$64	$53	$26	$1,219

	Obtain senior approval

1	1	1	23	23	23	69	$64	$53	$26	$3,289

	Complete and submit package1

0	5	1	0	115	23	138	$64	$53	$26	$6,693

	Subtotal	23	1	7	2	23	161	46	230	--	--	--	$11,201

Private Sector and

Local Governments	Others (e.g. non-profits, unions, academia)	86

	Review application and program information

0	1	0	0	86	0	86	$64	$53	$26	$4,558

	Obtain senior approval

1	1	1	86	86	86	258	$64	$53	$26	$12,298

	Complete and submit package1

0	5	1	0	430	86	516	$64	$53	$26	$25,026

	Subtotal	86	1	7	2	86	602	172	860	--	--	--	$41,882

	Total	375

	3750

$182,625

6(c)	Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs
Burden

EPA estimates that 375 applications will be submitted over the
three-year life of the clearance.  This estimate is based on the
assumption that about 300 participants will apply for recognition under
SDSI – 150 for Partner recognition and 150 for Champion recognition
– and that roughly half of the 150 participants who apply for Partner
recognition (or 75) will apply at a later time for Champion recognition.
 The estimate of 300 participants assumes that twice the number of
organizations that have expressed interest in SDSI will ultimately
participate (to date, 140 different organizations have expressed
interest).  Furthermore, due to the nature of SDSI and the demographic
of interested parties, EPA estimates that about 55% of participating
companies will be formulators, 10% chemical manufacturers, 6% retailers
/ distributors, 6% institutional purchasers, and 23% others.  The total
burden hours and cost associated with this information collection are
4986 hours and $248,133, respectively.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 	6(d)	Estimating Agency Burden and Costs

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 Exhibit 6.2 presents the estimated Agency burden
hours and costs associated with the information collection activities
under this ICR.  Other direct costs (copying, printing, telephone, and
mailing expenses) are also included.  EPA based its burden estimates on
its experience managing other voluntary programs.

Based on the general schedule (GS) pay schedule, EPA estimates an
average hourly labor rate (hourly rate plus the standard government
overhead factor of 1.6) of $58 for managerial staff, $43 for technical
staff, and $20 for clerical staff.  The Agency expects most activities
to be performed by managerial staff (25 percent) and technical staff (75
percent).

Exhibit 6.2.  Agency Burden/Cost

Activities	Hours per Labor Category	Labor Cost per Hour	Total Cost per
Activity	Total Hours and Cost

SDSI application form	EPA managerial	EPA technical	EPA managerial	EPA
technical	EPA managerial	EPA technical	Total Hours per Activity	Total
Cost per Activity

Distribute forms	7	23	$58	$43	$406	$989	30	$1,395

Answer questions	7	23	$58	$43	$406	$989	30	$1,395

Record / enter forms	10	30	$58	$43	$580	$1,290	40	$1,870

Verify information; Make awards selection	12	38	$58	$43	$696	$1,634	50
$2,330

Notify applicants of decision	3	9	$58	$43	$174	$387	12	$561

Total 	42	123	--	--	$2,262	$5,289	162	$7,551

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 	6(e)	Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables

a.	Respondent Tally

Exhibit 6.3.  Average Estimated Respondent Burden and Cost Summary

Average # of Respondents	Average Burden Hours	Average Cost

375	3,750	$182,625

b.	Agency Tally

Exhibit 6.4.  Average Estimated Agency Burden and Cost Summary

Burden Hours	Annual Cost

162	$7,551

	6(f)	Reasons for Change in Burden

	Since this is a new ICR, change in respondent burden is not applicable.

	6(g)	Burden Statement

The annual public burden for this collection of information is estimated
at 10 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions,
gathering information, and completing and reviewing the application.
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act, “burden” means the total
time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate,
maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal
agency.  For this collection it includes the time needed to review
instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and
systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and
providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to
be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or
otherwise disclose the information.  An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
The OMB control number for this information collection appears above.
The OMB control numbers for EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the CFR,
after appearing in the Federal Register, are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and
included on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable.

To comment on the Agency’s need for this information, the accuracy of
the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques,
EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0274, which is available for public viewing at the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW,
Washington, DC.  The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.
 The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the Pollution Prevention and Toxics Docket is (202)
566-0280.  An electronic version of the public docket is available at
HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main"
http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main .  Use this website
to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the
contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the
public docket that are available electronically.  Once in the system,
select “search,” then key in the docket ID number identified above.
Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW,
Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA.  Please include
the EPA Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0274 in any correspondence.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 ATTACHMENTS:

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 [NOTE: Unless otherwise noted, an electronic copy
of the attachment is available only as a PDF file.  You can still easily
access the electronic PDF file in the electronic version of the public
docket available through EDOCKET at     HYPERLINK
"http://www.epa.gov/edocket"  http://www.epa.gov/edocket .  Once in the
system, select “quick search,” then indicate that you’d like to
search by Docket and key in the following docket ID number:
EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0343.  Search the docket index for this document by the
title provided above.  If you have any difficulties, please contact the
technical person listed in the Federal Register notice announcing the
submission of this ICR to OMB for review and approval.]

Attachment A – Pollution Prevention Act Section 6604(b)(5); 42 U.S.C.
13103(b)(5)  [The electronic copy is available as part of the electronic
copy of the ICR’s Supporting Statement.]

Attachment B – SDSI Application Form

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 ATTACHMENT A

Pollution Prevention Act Section 6604(b)(5)

42 U.S.C. 13103(b)(5)

[Electronic copy available as part of the electronic copy of the ICR’s
Supporting Statement.]

SEC. 6604. EPA ACTIVITIES.

(a) AUTHORITIES.—The Administrator shall establish in the Agency an
office to carry out the functions of the Administrator

under this subtitle. The office shall be independent of the Agency’s
single-medium program offices but shall have the authority to review and
advise such offices on their activities to promote a multimedia approach
to source reduction. The office shall be under the direction of such
officer of the Agency as the Administrator shall designate.

(b) FUNCTIONS.—The Administrator shall develop and implement a
strategy to promote source reduction. As part of the strategy, the
Administrator shall—

(1) establish standard methods of measurement of source reduction;

(2) ensure that the Agency considers the effect of its existing and
proposed programs on source reduction efforts and shall review
regulations of the Agency prior and subsequent to their proposal to
determine their effect on source reduction;

(3) coordinate source reduction activities in each Agency Office and
coordinate with appropriate offices to promote source reduction
practices in other Federal agencies, and generic research and
development on techniques and processes which have broad applicability;

(4) develop improved methods of coordinating, streamlining and assuring
public access to data collected under Federal environmental statutes;

(5) facilitate the adoption of source reduction techniques by
businesses. This strategy shall include the use of the Source Reduction
Clearinghouse and State matching grants provided in this subtitle to
foster the exchange of information regarding source reduction
techniques, the dissemination of such information to businesses, and the
provision of technical assistance to businesses. The strategy shall also
consider the capabilities of various businesses to make use of source
reduction techniques;

(6) identify, where appropriate, measurable goals which reflect the
policy of this subtitle, the tasks necessary to achieve the goals, dates
at which the principal tasks are to be accomplished, required resources,
organizational responsibilities, and the means by which progress in
meeting the goals will be measured;

(8) 1 establish an advisory panel of technical experts comprised of
representatives from industry, the States, and public interest groups,
to advise the Administrator on ways to improve collection and
dissemination of data;

(9) establish a training program on source reduction opportunities,
including workshops and guidance documents, for State and Federal permit
issuance, enforcement, and inspection officials working within all
agency program

(10) identify and make recommendations to Congress to eliminate barriers
to source reduction including the use of incentives and disincentives;

(11) identify opportunities to use Federal procurement to encourage
source reduction;

(12) develop, test and disseminate model source reduction auditing
procedures designed to highlight source reduction opportunities; and

(13) establish an annual award program to recognize a company or
companies which operate outstanding or innovative source reduction
programs.

ATTACHMENT B

Safer Detergents Stewardship Initiative (SDSI) Application Form

Safer Detergents Stewardship Initiative (SDSI) Application

Overview:

EPA developed the Safer Detergents Stewardship Initiative (SDSI) to
recognize environmental leaders who voluntarily commit to the use of
safer surfactants.  Leading product manufacturers have made great
progress in developing safer, highly effective cleaners.  These
manufacturers believe that producing the safest products possible is
important to their role as stewards of the environment and public
health.  A number of U.S. corporations have acted in advance of SDSI to
use safer surfactants in their entire product lines.  Stakeholders who
have reformulated detergents using safer surfactants have called the
change cost-neutral.  More information on stakeholder views on SDSI can
be found at http://www.regulations.gov, document number:
EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0343-0002, docket number: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0343.

What is a Safer Surfactant?:

Safer surfactants are surfactants that break down quickly to
non-polluting compounds. CleanGredients( is a resource for information
on safer surfactants (www.cleangredients.org).

General Requirements:

Candidates should complete this application and have it signed by a
company authority (e.g., CEO or vice president for health and
environment).

Candidates should post a statement on their website describing the
actions that qualify them for recognition under SDSI.

Categories of Recognition:

There are two categories for recognition under SDSI: Champion and
Partner.

Champion is the highest level of recognition offered under SDSI.  At
this level, the participant is invited to the SDSI Awards ceremony,
listed on the EPA SDSI website as a champion, and may use a special logo
in their literature to help explain their participation in the program.

The Partner category provides recognition of significant accomplishment
towards the use of safer surfactants.  Partners will be listed on the
EPA SDSI website and may be granted recognition as a Champion in the
future, if appropriate. Partner recognition will sunset on the
commitment date provided in Section 3 of the Application.

Both Champions and Partners will receive a certificate of recognition
from DfE.  To be eligible for the awards ceremony, which will be held in
the Summer of 2008, candidates for Champion status should submit their
application by December 31, 2007.

Application Process:

Complete the application and submit a signed copy to the SDSI Awards
Coordinator. Unless you claim information as confidential, all
applications received will be considered public information and no
materials submitted will be returned.

Send completed applications to the appropriate address below. Please
note that irradiation of federal mail may damage electronic media or
other materials. It is highly recommended that a package delivery
service be used, especially if you are sending a disk.

Via US Postal Service:

US Environmental Protection Agency

Mail Code 7406M

Safer Detergent Stewardship Initiative

Attn: DfE Contact

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20460

Via Package Delivery Service:

Safer Detergent Stewardship Initiative

Attn: DfE Contact

US Environmental Protection Agency

EPA East, Room 5326

1201 Constitution Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20004

Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>

Confirmation of Receipt: EPA will confirm receipt of applications,
usually by email. If you have not received an acknowledgment within two
weeks of sending your applications, please contact DfE Contact at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or<PHONE_NUMBER>

Notification:  Winners will be notified prior to the official public
announcement.  Awards will be presented to the primary sponsor of the
application.

Questions: Questions about eligibility, nomination procedures, or the
Safer Detergent Stewardship Initiative should be directed to DfE Contact
of EPA’s Design for the Environment Program at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
202-564-9910

SECTION 1:  CONTACT INFORMATION

Organization Name:
_________________________________________________________

Contact Name:
______________________________________________________________

Address (City, State, Zip):
____________________________________________________

Phone:
______________________________________________________________________

Fax:
________________________________________________________________________
_

E-mail:
______________________________________________________________________

Website:
_____________________________________________________________________

Award and Type of Organization:

Indicate the type of your organization

______  Chemical Manufacturer – Manufactures surfactants

______  Formulator – Purchases and blends chemicals (including
surfactants) to create an end-use product for retailers and/or
distributors

______  Retailer / Distributor – Sells products containing surfactants

______  Institutional Purchaser – Purchases or specifies cleaning
products for use in multiple facilities (e.g., janitorial service
provider)

______  Other – Influences use of surfactants (e.g., non-profit, trade
association, academia)

Indicate the level of recognition for which you are applying.

(Refer to Table 1 for a description of Champion and Partner status for
each organization type.)

______ Champion (go to Section 2)	______ Partner (go to Section 3)

Participant Type	Table 1:  Requirements for Achieving:

	Champion Status	Partner Status

Chemical Manufacturers	Demonstrate that you only manufacture safer
surfactants

Document a strategy for ensuring that you manufacture only safer
surfactants	Commit to producing only safer surfactants1 by a date that
is reasonable for your circumstances

Document a strategy for ensuring that you will manufacture only safer
surfactants

Formulators	Demonstrate that you only use safer surfactants in
products1,,

Document a strategy for ensuring that only safer surfactants are used in
products	Commit to using only safer surfactants in your products1,3 by a
date that is reasonable for your circumstances

Document a strategy for ensuring that only safer surfactants will be
used in products

Retailers / Distributors	Demonstrate that only safer surfactants are
included in products2,3 intended for sale

Document a strategy for ensuring that only safer surfactants are
included in products3 intended for sale	Commit to sell only products3
containing safer surfactants by a date that is reasonable for your
circumstances

Document your active encouragement of the use of safer surfactants

Institutional Purchasers	Demonstrate that you only purchase products
containing safer surfactants

Document a strategy for ensuring that purchased products only contain
safer surfactants	Commit to only use products3 that only contain safer
surfactants by a date that is reasonable for your circumstances

Document your active encouragement of the use of safer surfactants

Others (e.g., non-profits, unions, academia)	Demonstrate outstanding
efforts to encourage the use of safer surfactants	Document your active
encouragement of the use of safer surfactants

SECTION 2: CHAMPION

Fill out this section if you are applying for recognition as a Champion.

Use the space below to explain how you meet the following requirements.

Please include supporting documents when appropriate and note these
documents in your statement. You may attach extra sheets as needed.

If you are a…	You must show that …	And then go to…

Chemical Manufacturer	You only manufacture safer surfactants	Section 2.1

Formulator	You only use safer surfactants in products	Section 2.1

Retailer / Distributor	Only safer surfactants are included in products
intended for sale	Section 2.2

Institutional Purchasers	All the products you purchase contain only
safer surfactants	Section 2.2

Other	You have made outstanding efforts to encourage the use of safer
surfactants	Go to Section 4

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

List your website describing the actions that qualify the company or
organization for recognition under SDSI.

________________________________________________________________________
____

2.1	Chemical Manufacturers and Formulators only:

Indicate or describe your product stewardship strategy for ensuring the
manufacture or use of safer surfactants:

( Use CleanGredients to choose surfactants

( Other, please describe:

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

2.2	Retailers / Distributors and Institutional Purchasers only:

Document your strategy for ensuring that all of your purchased products
contain only safer surfactants. You may attach extra sheets as needed.
An example of a strategy is a letter that is sent to suppliers requiring
them to provide products with only safer surfactants.  The retailer /
distributor will not be eligible for Champion recognition until it sells
products with only safer surfactants.

If you are a…	Document a strategy for ensuring that…

Retailer / Distributor	Only safer surfactants are included in products
intended for sale

Institutional Purchaser	Purchased products contain only safer
surfactants

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

SECTION 3: PARTNERS

Fill out this section if you are applying for recognition as a Partner.

List your website describing the actions that qualify you for
recognition under SDSI.

________________________________________________________________________
____

Use the space below to describe how you meet the following requirements.
 You should describe your commitment to a complete transition to safer
surfactants by a date that is reasonable for your circumstances. Please
state this date explicitly and explain briefly why it is a reasonable
date for your circumstances. Include supporting materials when
appropriate and note these materials in your statement. You may attach
extra sheets as needed.

If you are a…	You need to document your commitment to…

Chemical Manufacturer	Produce only safer surfactants

Formulator	Use only safer surfactants in your products

Retailer / Distributor	Only sell products that only contain safer
surfactants

Institutional Purchasers	Only purchase products that only contain safer
surfactants

Other	Skip this item

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

If you are an…	Document the following:

Other (e.g., trade association, NGO, etc.)	Your active encouragement of
safer surfactants

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

________________________________________________________________________
____

Section 4: CERTIFICATION OF APPLICATION

Please have company authority (e.g., CEO or vice president for health
and environment) sign here to verify the accuracy of the application’s
content.

____________________________________________________

Signature of Authorizing Entity

____________________________________________________

Printed Name and Title

____________________________________________________

Date of Signature

The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 10 hours per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, gathering information, and completing
and reviewing the application.  Send comments on the Agency's need for
this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any
suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through
the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection
Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460.  Include the OMB control
number in any correspondence.  Do not send the completed application to
this address.

OMB Control No. 2070-TBD

Approval expires XX/XX/XX

  ISSA is a leading international trade association for the cleaning
industry.  It has more than 4800 members, including approximately 300
cleaning product manufacturers.

 The Inventory Update Rule (IUR) requires companies that manufacture,
import or use certain chemicals listed on the TSCA inventory to report
to EPA information about these chemicals (e.g., production/use volume)
on a periodic basis.  IUR reporting occurs every five years.  Companies
are currently providing information for calendar year 2005.

 “Green to Gold: How Smart Companies Use Environmental Strategy to
Innovate, Create Value, and Build Competitive Advantage;” Daniel Esty
and Andrew Winston; Yale University Press, New Haven, CT; 2006

 NPEs are part of the APE family of chemicals.

 Includes burden of verifying data (about 40 hours), which EPA estimates
will only need to be done for 1 organization in each participant
category.  This burden, when distributed among all participants, is
about 32 minutes per participant ((40 hrs x 5 participants) / 375 total
participants).

 This includes all companies in the interest list as of December 2006,
excluding EPA and EPA contractors, and counting similar entities such as
“The Dow Chemical Company” and “The Dow Chemical Company, Larkin
Labs” as one company.

 Based on the list of interested parties as of December 2006.

 These three labor rates were estimated using the following GS-levels:
GS-13 Step-5 for managerial staff, GS-10 Step-10 for technical staff,
and GS-5 Step-1 for clerical staff.

 An example of a class of safer surfactants is linear alcohol
ethoxylates (LAE). LAEs are toxic to aquatic life, but break down
quickly to non-polluting compounds.  Nonylphenol ethoxylates, commonly
referred to as NPEs, are a surfactant class that does not meet the
definition of a safer surfactant.  Both NPEs and their breakdown
products, such as nonylphenol, are toxic to aquatic life.

 EPA will reserve the right to request, on a confidential basis, the
list of ingredients (e.g., bills of lading, invoices) or other relevant
documentation at any time to confirm that candidates have the achieved
the criteria for recognition.  If documentation is requested but not
received, EPA will withdraw recognition from that candidate.

 CleanGredients™ is a resource for information on safer surfactants.

 The deadline for using only safer surfactants in third-party finished
goods and Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA)-registered products is December 31, 2008.

 Products include those whose use routinely results in their discharge
to the environment (e.g., all-purpose cleaners, laundry detergents,
pesticides, airplane de-icers, fire-fighting foams and gels).

 An example of a strategy is a letter that is sent to suppliers
requiring them to provide products with only safer surfactants. The
retailer/distributor will not be eligible for Champion recognition until
its sells products with only safer surfactants.

S

[

Ž

º

[

ƒ

Ê

é

í

h

h

h

h

h

h

 h

h

h

h

 h

 h

 h

h

h

h

 h

 h

㐀ۖĀ̊d搃昀Ĵ

㐀ۖĀ̊d搃昀Ĵ

R

혈0ﰂ⤀䠌$分

혈0ﰂ⤀䠌$分

ô

ô

혈0⠋#

혈0⠋#

혈0⠋#

혈0⠋#

hì

혈0⠋#

ô

ô

혈0⠋#

that Partner recognition will sunset on the commitment date. After this
date, companies will need to apply for Champion recognition.

Information Collection Request for SDSI Program
             PAGE  25


  MacroButton macIb01 i

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

  MacroButton macIb02 i

[EPA–HQ–OPP–20[08]–[0529]; FRL–XXXX–X]

  MacroButton macIb03 i

RIN 2070–[Tolerances are exempt, unless proposed by EPA. If proposed, use the proposed rule’s RIN.]

[Laminarin]; Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of [laminarin in or] on [all food commodities] when applied preharvest [as a biochemical pesticide to stimulate natural defense mechanisms in plants]. [Laboratoires Goëmar SA c/o SciReg, Inc.] submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for residues of [laminarin].

DATES: This regulation is effective [insert date of publication in the Federal Register]. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before [insert date 60 days after date of publication in the Federal Register], and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPP–20[08]–[0529]. All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index available at http://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available in the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305–5805.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: [Chris Pfeifer], Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: [703-308-0031]; e-mail address: <EMAIL_ADDRESS> SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

	You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:

 Crop production (NAICS code 111).

	• Animal production (NAICS code 112).

	• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).

	• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

	This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Electronic Access to Other Related Information?

	You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.

C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?

	Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural regulations, which govern the submission of objections and requests for hearings, appear in 40 CFR part 178. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–20[08]–[0529] in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before [insert date 60 days after date of publication in the Federal Register].

	In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–20[08]–[0529], by one of the following methods.

  Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.

	• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.

	• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305–5805.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

	In the Federal Register of [July 31, 2008] ([73] FR [44719]) (FRL–8374–3), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance petition (PP [7E7276]) by [Laboratoires Goëmar SA c/o SciReg, Inc.], [12733 Director’s Loop, Woodbridge, VA 22192]. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 180 be amended by establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of [laminarin]. A summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner [Laboratoires Goëmar SA c/o SciReg, Inc.] was included in the docket for this action. [There were no comments received in response to the notice of filing].

	Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the exemption is “safe.” Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines “safe” to mean that “there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.” This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure. Pursuant to section 408(c)(2)(B) of FFDCA, in establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA, which require EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to “ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue....” Additionally, section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA requires that the Agency consider “available information concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's residues” and “other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.”

	EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. First, EPA determines the toxicity of pesticides. Second, EPA examines exposure to the pesticide through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as a result of pesticide use in residential settings.

III. Toxicological Profile

	Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information in support of this action and considered its validity, completeness, and reliability and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also considered available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and children.

β-glucans—particularly laminarin in this case—without documented toxicological effects, the data submitted to the Agency, in conjunction with and in support of this tolerance exemption, confirm that laminarin is virtually nontoxic and poses no dietary risks to humans.

Because laminarin is considered “toxicologically innocuous,” no residue studies are required to support a tolerance exemption. However, laminarin’s low toxicity profile notwithstanding, another justification for this exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is the unlikelihood of residues for this biochemical pesticide in or on food. Laminarin is intended for application as a systemic acquired resistance (SAR) inducer—a preventative mode of action. As such, it is applied early in a crop’s life cycle—in its growing stages—to help build immunity to disease organisms such as mold and bacterial infection. Furthermore, as a biochemical, it is prone to biodegrade rapidly. Data indicate that the active ingredient is more than 65% biodegraded after two weeks (Master Record Identification Number (MRID No.) 472649-54). Calculations indicate that it would be fully biodegraded long before any consumption would occur because the most likely final application of the pesticide would occur early in the growing season for plants treated with this pesticide. Accordingly, no exposures beyond background levels are expected.

	Summaries of the toxicological data submitted in support of this exemption from the requirement of a tolerance follow:

A.	Acute Toxicity:  Acute toxicity studies, submitted to support the registration of the end-use product containing laminarin, confirm a low toxicity profile and buttress the finding that this active ingredient poses no significant human health risk with regard to new food uses. Altogether, the acute toxicity data show virtual nontoxicity for all routes of exposure and suggest that any dietary risks associated with this carbohydrate would be negligible.

1.  The acute oral median lethal doses (LD50s) in rats were greater than 2,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and confirmed negligible toxicity through the oral route. There were no observed toxicological effects on the test subjects in either of the two acute oral studies submitted (Master Record Identification Numbers (MRID Nos.) 472649-30 and 472649-73).  Laminarin is Toxicity Category III for acute oral toxicity.

2.	The acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) in rats was greater than 5,000 mg/kg. These data substantiated laminarin’s relative dermal nontoxicity to the general public (MRID Nos. 472649-31 and 472649-74).  Laminarin is Toxicity Category IV for acute dermal toxicity.

3.	The acute inhalation median lethal concentration (LC50) was greater than 1.02 milligrams per liter (mg/L) in rats and showed no significant inhalation toxicity (MRID No. 472649-32).  Laminarin is Toxicity Category III for acute inhalation toxicity.

4.	A skin irritation study on rabbits indicated that laminarin was not irritating to the skin (MRID No. 472649-34).  Laminarin is Toxicity Category IV for dermal irritiation.

5.	Data indicated laminarin is not a dermal sensitizer (MRID Nos. 472649-35 and 472649-78).

	Data indicate that laminarin is not acutely toxic.  No toxic endpoints were established in any of the acute toxicity studies; and no significant toxicological effects were observed in any of the acute toxicity studies.

B.	Mutagenicity:  Three mutagenicity studies, using laminarin as the test substance, were performed. These studies are sufficient to confirm that there are no expected dietary or non-occupational risks of mutagenicity with regard to new food uses.

1.	The Reverse Mutation Assay (MRID No. 472649-42) showed that laminarin did not induce mutant colonies relative to control groups.

2.	The In vitro Mammalian Cells in Culture Assay (MRID No. 472649-43) demonstrated that laminarin did not damage chromosomes or the mitotic apparatus of bone marrow cells.

3.	A Bone Marrow Micronucleus Assay (MRID No. 472649-44) indicated that no toxicity was noted in either sex at any dose up to the limit dose of 2,000 mg/kg.

C.	Subchronic Toxicity:  Based on its biodegradation properties, residues of laminarin are not expected to result in significant dietary exposure beyond the levels expected in background dietary exposures. Nonetheless, three subchronic oral toxicity studies satisfied the data requirements for subchronic toxicity and indicated that laminarin has no subchronic toxicological effect.

1.	A 28-day Oral Toxicity Study (MRID No. 472649-37) found no toxicological effects regarding mortality, clinical observations, neurotoxicity assessment, body weight, food consumption, hematology, clinical chemistry, organ weights, and macroscopic or microscopic observations. The no observable effect level (NOEL) was determined to be 1,000 milligrams per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day).

2.	A 90-day Oral Toxicity Study (MRID No. 472649-38) found no statistical difference in hematology, clinical chemistry, or urinalysis between test subjects and the control. The NOAEL was determined to be 1,000 mg/kg/day.

3.	Another 90-day Oral Toxicity Study (MRID No. 472649-39) also found no statistical difference in hematology, clinical chemistry, or urinalysis between test subjects and the control. The NOAEL was again determined to be 1,000 mg/kg/day.

D.	Developmental Toxicity:  The data submitted to the Agency demonstrate a clear lack of developmental toxicity and supports the Agency’s conclusion that there is no risk of developmental toxicity associated with new food uses. Data submitted to the Agency satisfy the data requirements for developmental toxicity and indicate that laminarin poses negligible risk with regard to developmental toxicity.

1.	A Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study (MRID No. 472649-40) found no significant treatment-related reproductive effects or fetal abnormalities and established a no observable adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 1,000 mg/kg/day.

2.	A second Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study (MRID No. 472649-41) also found no significant treatment-related reproductive effects or fetal abnormalities and confirmed a NOAEL of 1,000 mg/kg/day.

E.	Effects on Endocrine Systems:  There is no available evidence demonstrating that laminarin is an endocrine disruptor in humans. As a result, the Agency is not requiring information on the endocrine effects of laminarin at this time. However, the Endocrine Disruption Screening Program (EDSP) has established a protocol, which guides the Agency in selecting suspect ingredients for review, and the Agency reserves the right to require new information should the program require it. Presently, based on the lack of exposure and the negligible toxicity profile of laminarin, no adverse effects to the endocrine are known or expected. Overall, the lack of evidence of endocrine disruption is consistent with laminarin’s low toxicity profile and supports this exemption from the requirement of a tolerance.]

IV. Aggregate Exposures

	In examining aggregate exposure, section 408 of FFDCA directs EPA to consider available information concerning exposures from the pesticide residue in food and all other non-occupational exposures, including drinking water from ground water or surface water and exposure through pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or buildings (residential and other indoor uses).

A. Dietary Exposure

	[Because of laminarin’s ability to biodegrade relatively quickly and the typical time during plant growth that it will be applied, the Agency does not anticipate many residues being present in or on food at the time of consumption.  Moreover, any residues that are present in or on food at the time of consumption as a result of pesticide use are likely to be indistinguishable from naturally occurring laminarin due to its natural occurrence and ubiquitous presence in foods and dietary supplements.  Finally, the Agency believes that it is unlikely that any exposure to the residues of laminarin will result in dietary risks because of the nontoxic mode of action as a SAR inducer and the pesticide’s negligible toxicity profile.]

	1. Food. [Exposure to residues of laminarin on foods is expected to be negligible. Data submitted to the Agency show that laminarin is 65% to 71% biodegraded within two weeks, and that it hydrolyzes very rapidly into glucose. Because applications necessarily occur early in the growing season (due to its mode of action as a SAR inducer), and given its short-lived presence on crops, no significant pesticidal residues are anticipated for harvested foods. However, in the event of exposure to residues of laminarin, no dietary risks are anticipated. As described in Unit III, acute, subchronic, mutagenic and developmental studies support its nontoxic profile. Furthermore, it is already present in foods without any known detrimental effects. Indeed, there is no information in the public literature suggesting any health issues to either animals or plants relative to this compound. Lastly, proposed rates of application of laminarin will result in substantially fewer residues in or on foods as a result of pesticide application than the quantities of laminarin already consumed in foods and those allowed in dietary supplements. In sum, no dietary exposure is expected; however, any potential dietary exposures would not be expected to pose any quantifiable risk, mainly due to laminarin’s nontoxic profile.]

	2. Drinking water exposure. [Residues of laminarin are not expected to be present in drinking water as applications of laminarin are made directly to terrestrial crops. Laminarin residues are not expected to percolate through the soil because residues are not expected to persist beyond the time it would typically take for any residues to percolate into the groundwater. In the event of errant spray drift or extraordinary rainfall, laminarin will not persist in water due to its rapid hydrolyzation into glucose. Moreover, given laminarin’s nontoxic profile as described in Unit III, risks from miniscule aquatic exposure would be negligible. Altogether, drinking water exposure is not expected to pose any quantifiable risk due to both a lack of residues and the nontoxicity of laminarin.]

B. Other Non-Occupational Exposure

	[Non-occupational exposure is not expected because lamarin is not approved for residential uses. The active ingredient is applied directly to commodities and degrades rapidly. Furthermore, the Agency notes that health risks are not expected from any pesticidal exposure to this active ingredient, no matter the circumstances. An August 2009 Agency risk assessment of laminarin clearly establishes that even prolonged and regular occupational exposures, which are associated with this active ingredient, pose negligible risks. Laminarin is characterized by its biodegradability, low toxicity profile, nontoxic, SAR-inducing mode of action, and demonstrable lack of dietary effects.]

	1. Dermal exposure. [Non-occupational dermal exposures to laminarin are expected to be negligible because of its directed agricultural use. Even in the event of dermal exposure to residues, the nontoxic profile of laminarin (as described in Unit III) is not expected to result in any risks through this route of exposure.]

	2. Inhalation exposure. [Non-occupational inhalation exposures are not expected to result from the agricultural uses of laminarin. Any inhalation exposure associated with this new agricultural use pattern is expected to be occupational in nature.]

V. Cumulative Effects

[Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D)(v), EPA has considered available information concerning the cumulative effects of exposure to laminarin residues and other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity. These considerations include the possible cumulative effects of such residues on infants and children.  Because laminarin operates through a nontoxic mode of action, there is no common mechanism of toxicity between this and any other substances; therefore, this provision does not apply.  Nevertheless, given that no exposure to residues are expected when applications are made in accordance with EPA-approved labeling and good agricultural practices, and laminarin has a long history of dietary consumption without incident, the Agency concludes that there is no reason to anticipate cumulative effects from the residues of this active ingredient with other related pesticides.]

VI. Determination of Safety for U.S. Population, Infants and Children

	[Health risks to humans, including infants and children, are considered negligible with regard to the pesticidal use of laminarin. As illustrated in Unit III, acute toxicity studies indicate that laminarin has negligible toxicity. It is ubiquitous in nature and present in fruits and vegetables. To date, there is no history of toxicological incident involving its consumption and its use in food supplements is already allowed by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Of equal note, little to no exposure to the residues of laminarin is expected. Pesticidal applications are applied directly to agricultural crops, and data suggest that residues are not expected beyond the time of harvest. Accordingly, little to no dietary exposure is expected. As such, the Agency has determined that this food use of laminarin poses no foreseeable risks to human health or the environment. Thus, there is a reasonable certainty of no harm to the general U.S. population, including infants and children, from exposure to this active ingredient.

	1. U.S. population. The Agency has determined that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to residues of laminarin to the U.S. population. This includes all anticipated dietary exposures and other non-occupational exposures for which there is reliable information. The Agency arrived at this conclusion based on the low levels of mammalian dietary toxicity associated with laminarin, the natural ubiquity of laminarin in foodstuffs, and information suggesting that the pesticidal use of laminarin will not result in a significant, if any, exposure. For these reasons, the Agency has determined that laminarin residues in and on all food commodities will be safe, and that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to residues of laminarin.

	2. Infants and children. FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides that EPA shall assess the available information about consumption patterns among infants and children, special susceptibility of infants and children to pesticide chemical residues, and the cumulative effects on infants and children of the residues and other substances with a common mechanism of toxicity. In addition, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides that EPA shall apply an additional tenfold margin of exposure (safety) for infants and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database unless the EPA determines that a different margin of exposure (safety) will be safe for infants and children. Margins of exposure (safety), which are often referred to as uncertainty factors, are incorporated into EPA risk assessments either directly or through the use of a margin of exposure analysis, or by using uncertainty (safety) factors in calculating a dose level that poses no appreciable risk.

 Based on all the information evaluated for laminarin, the Agency concludes that there are no threshold effects of concern and, as a result, the provision requiring an additional margin of safety does not apply.]

VII. Other Considerations

A. Endocrine Disruptors

	[There is no evidence, at this time, that suggests that laminarin will compromise the endocrine system, function in a manner similar to any known hormone, or act as an endocrine disruptor.]

B. Analytical Method(s)

	[Through this action, the Agency proposes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance of laminarin when used on food commodities, without any numerical limitations for residues. EPA has determined that residues resulting from the pesticidal use of laminarin are unlikely, and that there are no significant toxicity concerns in the event that residues of the active ingredient are present. As a result, the Agency has concluded that an analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes for laminarin.]

C. Codex Maximum Residue Level

	[There are no codex maximum residue levels established for residues of laminarin.]

VIII. Conclusions

	[Based on the data submitted to support this tolerance exemption, and other information available to the Agency, EPA is establishing an exemption from the tolerance requirements, pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c), for residues of laminarin in or on all food commodities.]

 IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

	This final rule establishes a tolerance under section 408(d) of FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this final rule has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This final rule does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

	Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as the tolerance in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply.

  MacroButton macIb04 Directions

	This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this action alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this final rule. In addition, this final rule does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104–4).

B*

ᘐ╨ഊ　㝊㔀脈࡜ఞȪ栖ਥ

ª

œ

ž

Ÿ

§

¨

©

ª

±

Ï

ñ

#

†

‡

Š

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

)Š

‹

‘

’

Û

õ

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

 hµp

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

>*B*

B*

B*

Ø	@

ᘒと뭹㔀脈B*

B*

B*

n

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

 hµp

B*

 hµp

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

 hµp

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

 hµp

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

 hµp

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

" hµp

B*

n

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

 hµp

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

 hµp

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

n

B*

B*

>*B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

 hµp

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

n

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

>*B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

n

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

@

š

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

hÛ

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

hÛ

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

hÛ

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

ᘉ╨ഊ㔀脈ఌЪ栖ਥ

ఖȪ栖ਥ

ఞȪ栖ਥ

⸀d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

X. Congressional Review Act

	The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final rule is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

	Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pes獴敒潰瑲湩湡敲潣摲敫灥湩敲畱物浥湥獴മ 䐍瑡摥›彟彟彟彟

 ________________

  macrobutton macTitle Click -- Select Title

	Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

	1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

	Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

	2. Section 180.[insert CFR cite] is added to subpart D to read as follows:

§ 180.[insert CFR cite] [Laminarin; Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance].

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

,r on all food commodities when laminarin is applied preharvest.]

[FR Doc. ??–???? Filed ??–??–??; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–S

 PAGE

 PAGE   12


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 30, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 59594]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20842]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[EPA-R03-RCRA-2015-0674; FRL-9951-50-Region 3]

Maryland: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Maryland has applied to the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) for final authorization of revisions to its
hazardous waste program under the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). EPA proposes to grant final authorization to Maryland. In
the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register, EPA is
authorizing the revisions by a direct final rule. We have explained the
reasons for this authorization in the preamble to the direct final
rule. Unless EPA receives written comments that oppose this
authorization during the comment period, the direct final rule will
become effective on the date it establishes, and EPA will not take
further action on this proposal.

DATES: Send your written comments by September 29, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
RCRA-2015-0674, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail: Stacie Pratt, Mailcode 3LC50, Office of State Programs,
U.S. EPA Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029.
    4. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
    For further information on how to submit comments, please see
today's direct final rule published in the ``Rules and Regulations''
section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stacie Pratt, Mailcode 3LC50, Office
of State Programs, U.S. EPA Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia,
PA 19103-2029, Phone Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Rules and Regulations section of the
Federal Register, EPA is authorizing the revisions by a direct final
rule. EPA did not make a proposal prior to the direct final rule
because we believe this action is not controversial and do not expect
comments that oppose it. We have explained the reasons for this
authorization in the preamble of the direct final rule. Unless EPA
receives adverse written comments that oppose this authorization during
the comment period, the direct final rule will become effective on the
date it establishes, and EPA will not take further action on this
proposal. If EPA receives comments that oppose this action, we will
withdraw the Direct Final Rule, and it will not take effect. EPA will
then respond to public comments in a later final rule based on this
proposal and after consideration of all comments. You may not have
another opportunity for comment. If you want to comment on this action,
you must do so at this time. For additional information, please see the
direct final rule published in the Rules and Regulations section of
this Federal Register.

    Dated: August 12, 2016.
Shawn M. Garvin,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region III.
[FR Doc. 2016-20842 Filed 8-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P