[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 133 (Friday, July 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40195-40204]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16172]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

Intercity Passenger Rail Grade Crossing Improvements, Positive
Train Control Implementation, and Passenger Rail Corridor Investment
Plan Grant Funds

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of funding availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice details the application requirements and
procedures for obtaining funding for eligible intercity passenger rail
grade crossing improvement projects, positive train control
implementation projects, and Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan
projects. The opportunities described in this notice are available
under Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number 20.314,
``Railroad Development.''

DATES: Applications for funding under this solicitation are due no
later than 5:00 p.m. EDT, September 15, 2014. Applications for funding
received after 5:00 p.m. EDT on September 15, 2014 will not be
considered. See Section 4 of this notice for additional information
regarding the application process.

ADDRESSES: Applications must be submitted via Grants.gov. For any
required or supporting application materials that an applicant is
unable to submit via Grants.gov (such as oversized engineering
drawings), an applicant may submit an original and two (2) copies to
Mary Ann Mcnamara, Office of Program Delivery, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Mail Stop 20, Washington, DC
20590. However, due to delays caused by enhanced screening of mail
delivered via the U.S. Postal Service, applicants are advised to use
other means of conveyance (such as courier service) to assure timely
receipt of materials.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information regarding this
notice, please contact Mary Ann McNamara, Office of Program Delivery,
Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Mail Stop
20, Washington, DC 20590; Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Phone: (202)
493-6393; Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Notice to applicants: The FRA recommends applicants read this
notice in its entirety prior to preparing application materials. There
are several administrative prerequisites described herein that
applicants must comply with in order to submit an application, as well
as application requirements that may differ depending on the type of
project and funding sought. The FRA has also established the FY14 Grant
Application Solicitation homepage on the FRA Web site, which houses
certain required application materials and additional guidance for
topics referenced in this notice. The FY14 Grant Application
Solicitation homepage is located at www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0701.
    Additionally, applicants should note that the required Project
Narrative component of the application package may not exceed 25 pages
in length (including any appendices).

Table of Contents:

1. Funding Opportunity Description
2. Award Information
3. Eligibility and Review Criteria
4. Application and Submission Information
5. Award Administration Information
6. Agency Contact

Section 1: Funding Opportunity Description

1.1 Background

    The purpose of this notice is to solicit applications for eligible
intercity passenger rail grade crossing improvement projects, positive
train control implementation projects, and Passenger Rail Corridor
Investment Plan projects. The funding available under this solicitation
was appropriated by Congress over a period of several years. Most
recently, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (FY14 Omnibus, Pub.
L. 113-76, January 17, 2014) made available $41,827,500 in unobligated
funding originally authorized under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU,
Pub. L. 109-59, August 10, 2005; and later amended under the SAFETEA-LU
Technical Corrections Act, Pub. L. 110-244, June 6, 2008) and
originally appropriated under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008
(Pub. L. 110-161, December 26, 2007) and Omnibus Appropriations Act,
2009 (Pub. L. 111-8, March 11, 2009). FRA is also making available at
least $16,500,000 in additional unobligated funds previously
appropriated to FRA under its High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail
(HSIPR) Program. These unobligated funds are available due to projects
that were completed under budget or that were not completed as
originally anticipated. This notice is also intended to establish a
pool of applications that could receive any additional eligible funding
that may become available under similar circumstances in the near
future.

1.2 FRA-Led Multi-State Planning

    In addition to the funding opportunities described in this notice,
the FY14 Omnibus also permits the Secretary of Transportation to retain
a portion of the $41,827,500 in previous SAFETEA-LU funds to
facilitate--at the Federal level--the preparation of planning documents
for passenger rail corridors and networks located in multiple states.
The Secretary of Transportation has exercised this authority to provide
$22,000,000 to complete the Department's NEC FUTURE program, which is a
comprehensive planning effort to define, evaluate, and prioritize
future

high-speed rail investments along the Northeast Corridor (additional
information regarding NEC FUTURE is available at www.NECFUTURE.com). In
addition to NEC FUTURE, the FRA is soliciting statements of interest
from other groups of states that wish to participate in an FRA-led
planning process for multi-state passenger rail networks. Additional
information on this FRA-led planning process, including how to submit
statements of interest, is available at www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0021.

1.3 Funding Approach

    In total, at least $36,327,500 is available for awards under this
solicitation. The following table summarizes the amount of funding
available per funding source, as well as the eligible project
categories and match requirements. Section 3 of this notice provides
detailed information and instructions pertaining to applicant and
project eligibility, cost sharing and match requirements, and
application review criteria.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Eligible project     Required federal/non-federal match
      Program/funding source        Amount available       categories                    percentage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New FY14 Omnibus Authority.......        $19,827,500   Intercity   80-20.
                                                       Passenger Rail
                                                       Capital.
                                                       Railroad
                                                       Safety Technology.
                                                       High-Speed
                                                       Rail Corridor
                                                       Planning.
                                                       FRA-Led     (100 percent Federal for FRA-Led
                                                       Multi-State          Planning).
                                                       Planning\1\.
Remaining FY10 HSIPR.............         $5,200,000   Intercity   80-20
                                                       Passenger Rail
                                                       Capital.
Remaining FY08/FY09 HSIPR........        $11,300,000   Intercity   50-50
                                                       Passenger Rail
                                                       Capital.
    Total........................         36,327,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As the table above indicates, and unlike the remaining FY08, FY09,
and FY10 HSIPR Program funding, the $19,827,500 made available by the
FY14 Omnibus may fund multiple project types--intercity passenger rail
capital (49 U.S.C. 24401(2)(A)), railroad safety technology (49 U.S.C.
20158), high-speed rail corridor planning (49 U.S.C. 26101(b)), and
FRA-led multi-state planning (FY14 Omnibus). Subject to the type and
quality of applications received, the FRA intends to award/allocate the
funding made available by the FY14 Omnibus to projects under each of
the eligible project types. However, the FRA is not predetermining
specific dollar allocations among these project types.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Statements of interest for FRA-led multi-state planning are
being requested separately and will not be accepted or considered
through this solicitation. Additional information on this FRA-led
planning process, including how to submit statements of interest, is
available at www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In order to maximize the benefits of the amount of funding
available, the FRA is choosing to further focus the broad project
eligibilities allowed for under the appropriations acts to specific
project types that align with FRA's current mission and objectives.
Applications for projects under the ``intercity passenger rail
capital'' category should focus on grade crossing improvement projects
related to intercity passenger rail service; applications for projects
under the ``railroad safety technology'' category should focus on
positive train control (PTC) implementation projects; and applications
for projects under the ``high-speed rail corridor planning'' category
should focus on developing new or expanded Passenger Rail Corridor
Investment Plans. Additional information of these more focused project
types is contained in Section 3 of this notice and on the FY14 Grant
Application Solicitation homepage at www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0701.

1.4 Legislative Authority

    The funding made available under this notice was appropriated from
the following sources:
     Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (Pub. L. 110-161,
December 26, 2007);
     Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Pub. L. 111-8, March 11,
2009);
     Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117,
December 16, 2009); and
     Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (Pub. L. 113-76,
January 17, 2014).
    The activities under the FY10 and FY14 funding are authorized by
the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act, 2008 (Pub. L. 110-
432, October, 16, 2008). The activities under the FY08 and FY09 funding
are authorized through their respective appropriations acts and do not
have any underlying statutory authorization.

Section 2: Award Information

2.1 Application Limits

    The FRA anticipates making multiple awards from the funding made
available in this notice and is not predetermining any minimum or
maximum dollar amounts for awards. However, given the relatively
limited amount of funding that is currently available, applicants are
encouraged to constrain their Federal funding requests to a maximum of
$3,000,000 per application. While this $3,000,000 application limit is
a recommendation and not a firm requirement, applications exceeding
this $3,000,000 threshold must explain why any requested funding over
$3,000,000 is necessary to implement the proposed project. Applicants
for grade crossing projects in particular are advised to subdivide
higher-cost undertakings into separate project components or discrete
phases that demonstrate operational independence and public benefits in
order to give FRA maximum flexibility in selecting projects or project
components. Additionally, the FRA may choose to award a grant for less
than the amount requested in the application.
    FRA will make awards for projects selected under this notice
through cooperative agreements. Cooperative agreements allow for
greater Federal involvement in carrying out the agreed upon investment,
including technical assistance, review of interim work products, and
increased program oversight. The funding provided under these
cooperative agreements will be made available to grantees on a
reimbursable basis.

2.2 Application Review Process

    Applications will proceed through a three-part review process:
    1. Screening for completeness and eligibility;
    2. Evaluation of eligible applications by technical panels applying
the evaluation criteria; and
    3. Project selection by the FRA Administrator applying additional
selection criteria.
    Each application will first be screened for eligibility
(requirements outlined in Section 3 of this notice) and completeness
(containing all required documentation outlined in Section 4 of this
notice).

    Eligible and complete applications will then be evaluated by
technical panels consisting of subject-matter experts against the
evaluation criteria (outlined in Section 3 of this notice). The FRA
will not assign specific numerical scores to applications based on the
evaluation criteria. Rather, ratings of ``highly recommended,''
``recommended,'' ``acceptable,'' or ``not recommended'' will be
assigned for each evaluation criterion upon which the applications are
being reviewed.
    The ratings assigned by the technical panels will not in themselves
constitute the final award determination, as this is only the second
step in the review process. All eligible and complete applications,
regardless of the ratings they receive from the technical panels, will
be advanced to the FRA Administrator for funding consideration. The FRA
Administrator will also take into consideration several cross-cutting
and comparative selection criteria (see Section 3.4 of this notice) to
determine awards. The FRA will award funds to projects that are well-
aligned with one or more of the evaluation and selection criteria. In
addition, FRA will consider whether a project has a negative effect on
any of the evaluation and selection criteria, and any such negative
effect may reduce the likelihood that the project will be selected for
award.

Section 3: Eligibility and Review Criteria

    This notice solicits applications for three distinct project types,
with funding appropriated from several sources. As such, there are
varying minimum requirements that applications must meet related to
applicant eligibility, project eligibility, cost sharing, and the
fulfillment of other prerequisites. The differences among the three
project types also necessitate that they be reviewed against separate
evaluation criteria. Section 3.1 of this notice will cover the
eligibility and review requirements for intercity passenger rail grade
crossing improvement projects, Section 3.2 for positive train control
implementation projects, and Section 3.3 for Passenger Rail Corridor
Investment Plan projects. Section 3.4 of this notice will cover the
additional selection criteria that will be applied to all applications
by the FRA Administrator.

3.1 Intercity Passenger Rail Grade Crossing Improvement Projects

3.1.1 Applicant Eligibility
    The following entities are eligible applicants for intercity
passenger rail grade crossing improvement projects:
     States (including the District of Columbia);
     Groups of States;
     Interstate compacts; and
     Public agencies established by one or more States and
having responsibility for providing intercity passenger rail service.
3.1.2 Project Eligibility
    Eligible grade crossing projects must involve capital improvements
to highway-rail grade crossings that are related to intercity passenger
rail service. Applicants must demonstrate that a proposed project is
both a capital improvement to a highway-rail grade crossing and that
the project improves intercity passenger rail service. The following is
a non-exhaustive list of eligible grade crossing projects:
     Safety and/or operational improvements at public or
private grade crossings;
     Installation of or upgrades to crossing signal equipment;
     Crossing closures;
     Grade separations;
     Pedestrian crossing improvements;
     Track circuitry improvements to activate warning devices;
     Integration of crossing warning systems with advanced
train control, signal preemption, and intelligent highway traffic
control systems; and
     Other civil or utility projects that improve crossing
surfaces, lighting, and sight distance.
3.1.3 Non-Federal Match Requirements and Other Funding Restrictions
    As outlined in Section 1.3 of this notice, intercity passenger rail
grade crossing projects are eligible to be funded from three separate
sources of funding. Both the $19,827,500 made available by the FY14
Omnibus and the $5,200,000 in remaining FY10 HSIPR Program funding
allow for up to an 80 percent Federal share of project costs. However,
the remaining $11,300,000 in FY08/FY09 HSIPR Program funding limits the
Federal share of project costs to 50 percent. The required 20 percent
or 50 percent non-Federal match, depending on the funding source, may
be composed of public sector (state or local) or private sector
funding. However, the FRA cannot consider any other Federal funds, nor
any non-Federal funds already expended (or otherwise encumbered),
towards the matching requirement. Additionally, FRA is limiting the
method for calculating the non-Federal match to cash contributions
only--``in-kind'' contributions will not be accepted. Matching funds
provided in excess of the minimum requirements will be considered in
evaluating the merit of an application.
    Applicants that propose a 50 percent non-Federal match will be more
likely to have their applications selected for funding, as they will be
eligible to receive funding under each of the three funding sources
contained in this notice (and specifically the $11,300,000 in 50-50
match funding that is dedicated to grade crossing projects). However,
these 50-50 match funds contain three eligibility restrictions that
differ from the 80-20 match funds:
     States are the only eligible applicant type;
     Proposed projects must be specifically included in the
applicant's Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) at the
time of application to be eligible; and
     States must include intercity passenger rail services as
an integral part of statewide transportation planning as required under
23 U.S.C. 135.
3.1.4 Evaluation Criteria
    The FRA intends to award funds to grade crossing projects that
achieve the maximum public benefits possible, given the amount of
funding available. Analysis provided by applicants that quantifies the
monetary value (whenever possible) of the anticipated public benefits
of the proposed project will be particularly relevant to the FRA in
evaluating applications.\2\ The systematic process of comparing
expected benefits and costs helps decision-makers organize information
about, and evaluate trade-offs between, alternative transportation
investments. The FRA will consider benefits and costs using standard
data and qualitative information provided by applicants and will
evaluate applications in a manner consistent with Executive Order 12893
(Principles for Federal Infrastructure Investments, 59 FR 4233), OMB
Circular A-94

(Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal
Programs), and OMB Circular A-4 (Regulatory Analysis).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Applicants are encouraged to reference Sections 1 and 2 of
the Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER)
Benefit-Cost Analysis Resource Guide for recommended values to use
in monetizing benefits and costs of transportation projects. This
Resource Guide was developed by the U.S. Department of
Transportation for use in the TIGER Discretionary Grant program and
can be located on the FY14 Application Solicitation homepage at
www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0701.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FRA intends to analyze all grade crossing applications
utilizing FRA's GradeDec tool to support the evaluation process.
GradeDec is a web-based application and decision support tool intended
for the identification and evaluation of highway-rail grade crossing
upgrades, separations, and closures. The GradeDec tool was designed for
the needs of Federal, state, and local authority decision makers, and
employs benefit-cost methodologies to assess grade crossing investment
alternatives at the corridor level or in a region. The modeling
frameworks built into the GradeDec tool were developed by the FRA and
include research findings from the Volpe National Transportation
Systems Center and the National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
Additional information on GradeDec is available at www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0337.
    Applications for intercity passenger rail grade crossing projects
will be reviewed by panels of DOT subject-matter experts against the
following three evaluation criteria.
Safety Benefits
    The following factors will be considered in assessing a proposed
project's achievement of safety benefits:
     The extent to which the proposed project will improve
safety at a crossing or series of crossings where safety incidents have
recently occurred or where a high potential exists for accidents
between pedestrian and/or vehicle traffic and intercity passenger rail
operations;
     Whether the proposed project will upgrade a crossing or a
series of crossings to create a ``sealed corridor'' segment utilizing
advanced warning technology, four-quadrant gates, or median
separators--with preference to crossing closures;
     The proposed project's ability to foster a safe,
connected, accessible transportation system for the multimodal movement
of people and goods;
     The extent to which the proposed project conforms with
FRA's ``High-Speed Passenger Rail Safety Strategy'' guidance that was
published in November 2009 (http://www.fra.dot.gov/eLib/Details/L03624); and
     Where applicable, the extent to which the proposed project
will improve the safety of transporting energy products on rail routes
over which both intercity passenger rail and freight rail services
operate.
Transportation Benefits
    The following factors will be considered in assessing a proposed
project's achievement of non-safety related transportation benefits:
     The extent to which the proposed project contributes to
other improvements to intercity passenger rail operations, as reflected
by estimated increases in operational reliability and on-time
performance, increases in average and/or top operating speeds,
increases in ridership, reductions in trip times, additional service
frequencies, and other related factors;
     The extent to which a proposed project generates cross-
modal benefits for commuter rail, freight rail (including ports served
by freight rail), or highway operations and safety;
     The extent to which a proposed project benefits a ``state-
supported'' intercity passenger rail service and enables state sponsors
and their partners to invest in additional capital projects; and
     The extent to which the proposed project will mitigate
mobility and access barriers for all modes of transportation--including
bicycle and pedestrian enhancements--and better connect communities to
centers of employment, education, and services (including for non-
drivers) and that hold promise to stimulate long-term job growth,
especially in economically distressed areas.
Project Development Approach
    The following factors will be considered in assessing how the
proposed project was planned and developed to date:
     The applicant's progress, at the time of application, in
reaching compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
for the proposed project. Although a NEPA decision document (Record of
Decision, Finding of No Significant Impact, Categorical Exclusion
determination) is not required at the time of application, projects
that utilize innovative project delivery approaches to expedite NEPA or
are accompanied by a final NEPA determination will be looked upon
favorably during the evaluation and selection process;
     The proposed project's consistency with an adopted service
development plan and state rail plan;
     The quality and completeness of the proposed project's
Statement of Work, including whether a sufficient level of detail
regarding scope, schedule, and budget is provided to immediately
advance the project to award;
     The level of support demonstrated for the application and
proposed project from key project partners (letters of support are
encouraged), including the infrastructure owning railroad, railroad
operator, local governments, and other relevant stakeholders;
     The equitable financial participation from benefiting
entities in the project's financing;
     The applicant's financial, legal, and technical capacity
to implement the project; and
     Whether the engineering materials submitted with the
application are of sufficient quality to assess the proposed project's
design and constructability risks.

3.2 Positive Train Control Implementation Projects

3.2.1 Applicant Eligibility
    The following entities are eligible applicants for positive train
control implementation projects:
     Passenger and freight railroad carriers;
     Railroad suppliers; and
     State and local governments.
    To be eligible for assistance, the above entities must have either
received approval of the Technology Implementation Plans (TIP) and
Positive Train Control Implementation Plans (PTCIP) required by 49
U.S.C. 20156(e)(2) and 20157, or demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
FRA that they are currently developing the required plans where
applicable. Preference will be given in the following order:
    1. Entities that have completed and received FRA approval of both
their TIP and PTCIP.
    2. Entities that have completed and received FRA approval of their
PTCIP.
    3. Entities that have submitted their PTCIP to FRA for approval.
    4. Entities that have certified to FRA progress towards completion
of their PTCIP and TIP.
    5. All other eligible entities.
    Collaborative project submissions by freight and passenger
carriers, suppliers, and State and local governments on eligible
projects will be evaluated more favorably.
3.2.2 Project Eligibility
    The FRA is soliciting applications for projects that will benefit
the overall implementation of positive train control on freight,
intercity passenger, and commuter railroads. Given that the amount of
funding available is not likely sufficient to cover the costs necessary
to deploy positive train control on any given railroad, applications
should focus on the research and development of technologies that will
lower the costs, speed implementation, increase

interoperability, and improve the reliability of positive train control
systems.
    The FRA is particularly interested in advancing research and
development on the following topics related to positive train control:
cybersecurity and wireless communications security, back-office
reliability, and deployment of an Interoperable Train Control Messaging
(ITCM/ITCSM) shared network for short lines and commuter railroads.
Additional information on these suggested topic areas are located on
the FY14 Application Solicitation homepage at www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0701. Applicants should note that these topics represent suggested
areas of interest by the FRA, and any otherwise eligible applications
meeting the criteria above will be evaluated and considered for award.
3.2.3 Non-Federal Match Requirements
    The $19,827,500 made available by the FY14 Omnibus is the only
source of funding contained in this notice under which positive train
control implementation projects may be funded. The FY14 Omnibus allows
for up to an 80 percent Federal share of project costs. The required 20
percent non-Federal match may be composed of public sector (state or
local) or private sector funding. However, the FRA cannot consider any
other Federal funds, nor any non-Federal funds already expended (or
otherwise encumbered), towards the matching requirement. Additionally,
FRA is limiting the method for calculating the non-Federal match to
cash contributions only--``in-kind'' contributions will not be
accepted. Matching funds provided in excess of the minimum requirements
will be considered in evaluating the merit of an application.
3.2.4 Evaluation and Selection Criteria
    The FRA intends to award funds to positive train control
implementation projects that achieve the maximum public benefits
possible, given the amount of funding available. Analysis provided by
applicants that quantifies the monetary value (whenever possible) of
the anticipated public benefits of the proposed project will be
particularly relevant to the FRA in evaluating applications.\3\ The
systematic process of comparing expected benefits and costs helps
decision-makers organize information about, and evaluate trade-offs
between, alternative transportation investments. The FRA will consider
benefits and costs using standard data and qualitative information
provided by applicants and will evaluate applications in a manner
consistent with Executive Order 12893 (Principles for Federal
Infrastructure Investments, 59 FR 4233), OMB Circular A-94 (Guidelines
and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs), and
OMB Circular A-4 (Regulatory Analysis).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Applicants are encouraged to reference Sections 1 and 2 of
the TIGER Benefit-Cost Analysis Resource Guide for recommended
values to use in monetizing benefits and costs of transportation
projects. This Resource Guide was developed by the U.S. Department
of Transportation for use in the TIGER Discretionary Grant program
and can be located on the FY14 Application Solicitation homepage at
www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0701.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Applications for positive train control implementation projects
will be reviewed by panels of DOT subject-matter experts against the
following three evaluation criteria.
PTC Deployment Benefits
    The following factors will be considered in assessing a proposed
project's achievement of PTC deployment benefits:
     The degree to which the successful implementation of the
proposed idea would advance the technical deployment of PTC, including
improvements to reliability, safety, security, and maintainability,
among others issues; and
     The degree to which the successful implementation of the
proposed idea would decrease PTC implementation and maintenance costs.
Technical Merit
    The following factors will be considered in assessing a proposed
project's technical merit:
     The degree to which proposed ideas exhibit a sound
scientific and engineering basis;
     How well the proposed ideas could be practically applied
in, and would be compatible with, the railroad environment; and
     The perceived likelihood of technical and practical
success.
Project Development Approach
    The following factors will be considered in assessing how the
proposed project was planned and developed to date:
     The technical qualifications and demonstrated experience
of key personnel proposed to lead and perform the technical efforts,
and qualifications of primary and supporting organizations to fully and
successfully execute the proposal plan within proposed timeframe and
budget;
     The degree to which proposed effort is supported by
multiple entities (letters of support are encouraged);
     The affordability and degree to which the proposed effort
appears to be a good value for the amount of funding requested;
     The reasonableness and realism of the proposed costs; and
     The extent of proposed cost sharing or cost participation
under the proposed effort (exclusive of the applicant's prior
investment).
    All evaluation criteria, when combined, are significantly more
important than cost or price alone. Technical merit is appreciably more
important than cost or price and, as such, greater consideration will
be given to technical excellence rather than cost or price alone. An
offer must be found acceptable under all applicable evaluation factors
to be considered eligible for award. Awards will be made to applicants
whose offers provide the best value to the Government in terms of
technical excellence, cost or price, and performance risk to include
consistency and accord with the objectives of the solicitation and
FRA's expressed areas of interest.

3.3 Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plans

3.3.1 Applicant Eligibility
    The following entities are eligible applicants for Passenger Rail
Corridor Investment Plan projects:
     States (including the District of Columbia);
     Groups of States;
     Interstate compacts; and
     Public agencies established by one or more States and
having responsibility for providing intercity passenger rail service.
3.3.2 Project Eligibility
    Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plans consist of two distinct
components: (1) A service development plan and (2) corridor-wide
environmental documentation. Applicants requesting funding to develop a
Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan must apply for any necessary
work to develop both elements, the service development plan and
corridor-wide environmental documentation. If the applicant has already
completed one of these documents or a component thereof, FRA must have
accepted that document as meeting the minimum requirements in order for
the applicant to receive a grant to complete the remaining
component(s). Similarly, applicants that have either already completed
or are in the process of developing elements of a Passenger Rail
Corridor Investment Plan through an FRA grant may request

additional Federal funding to expand the scope or geographic study area
of the existing planning effort. However, any additional funding
requested must result in a fully completed Passenger Rail Corridor
Investment Plan. Additionally, pursuant to the FY14 Omnibus, corridor
planning improvements grants are only available for passenger rail
corridors that are not covered by a Tier 1 Environmental Impact
Statement completed within the last ten years (since January 17, 2004).
Further guidance on the required elements of a Passenger Rail Corridor
Investment Plan is available on the FY14 Grant Application Solicitation
homepage at www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0701.
3.3.3 Non-Federal Match Requirements
    The $19,827,500 made available by the FY14 Omnibus is the only
source of funding contained in this notice under which Passenger Rail
Corridor Investment Plans may be funded. The FY14 Omnibus required that
the Secretary of Transportation make no less than $20,000,000 available
for corridor planning. Although this requirement has already been met
by the Department allocating $22,000,000 to complete NEC FUTURE (as
described in Section 1.2 of this notice), the FRA intends to award
funds from the $19,827,500 remaining for additional meritorious
planning projects. The FY14 Omnibus allows for an up to 80 percent
Federal share of project costs. The required 20 percent non-Federal
match may be composed of public sector (state or local) or private
sector funding. However, the FRA cannot consider any other Federal
funds, nor any non-Federal funds already expended (or otherwise
encumbered), towards the matching requirement. Additionally, FRA is
limiting the method for calculating the non-Federal match to cash
contributions only--``in-kind'' contributions will not be accepted.
Matching funds provided in excess of the minimum requirements will be
considered in evaluating the merit of an application.
3.3.4 Evaluation and Selection Criteria
    The FRA intends to award funds to Passenger Rail Corridor
Investment Plan projects that achieve the maximum public benefits
possible, given the amount of funding available. Analysis provided by
applicants that quantifies the monetary value (whenever possible) of
the anticipated public benefits of the underlying projects of the
Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan will be particularly relevant
to the FRA in evaluating applications.\4\ The systematic process of
comparing expected benefits and costs helps decision-makers organize
information about, and evaluate trade-offs between, alternative
transportation investments. The FRA will consider benefits and costs
using standard data and qualitative information provided by applicants
and will evaluate applications in a manner consistent with Executive
Order 12893 (Principles for Federal Infrastructure Investments, 59 FR
4233), OMB Circular A-94 (Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-
Cost Analysis of Federal Programs), and OMB Circular A-4 (Regulatory
Analysis).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Applicants are encouraged to reference Sections 1 and 2 of
the TIGER Benefit-Cost Analysis Resource Guide for recommended
values to use in monetizing benefits and costs of transportation
projects. This Resource Guide was developed by the U.S. Department
of Transportation for use in the TIGER Discretionary Grant program
and can be located on the FY14 Application Solicitation homepage at
www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0701.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Applications for Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan projects
will be reviewed by panels of DOT subject-matter experts against the
following two evaluation criteria:
Potential Transportation and Other Public Benefits
    The following factors will be considered in assessing a proposed
project's potential achievement of transportation and other public
benefits:
     The clarity and detail with which the applicant has
identified the need to be addressed by the proposed service;
     The market potential of the corridor being studied, taking
into consideration such factors as population demographics, density,
economic activity, and travel patterns;
     The potential for the corridor investment to deliver high-
speed and intercity passenger rail service benefits, including
ridership, on-time performance reliability, travel time, service
frequencies, safety, and other factors;
     The extent to which the Passenger Rail Corridor Investment
Plan will examine and evaluate non-transportation issues that could
provide public benefits, including but not limited to land use,
economic development, energy efficiency and environmental quality,
transportation network resilience, social equity and environmental
justice, and strengthening opportunities for upward socioeconomic
mobility; and
     The consideration and integration of other transportation
modes in the planning process and the proposed service's ability to
foster a safe, connected, accessible transportation system for the
multimodal movement of people and goods.
Future Program Viability and Sustainability
    The following factors will be considered in assessing the potential
viability and sustainability of the intercity passenger rail service
under consideration in the Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan:
     The likelihood that the final deliverables (service
development plan and environmental decision document) will be completed
and of sufficient quality to be implemented upon completion of the
proposed cooperative agreement;
     The demonstrated institutional commitment of the State and
all other key stakeholders to quickly execute the program once planning
is complete;
     The degree to which the planning process meaningfully
incorporates input from affected communities, local governments,
regional councils and planning organizations, neighboring States,
railroads, transportation modal partners, environmental interests,
workforce investment boards, the public and other stakeholders--early
and throughout the process;
     The level of support demonstrated for the application,
proposed study, and underlying projects from key project partners
(letters of support are encouraged);
     The likelihood that the corridor(s) being studied can
yield measurable service and public benefits in a reasonable period of
time; and
     The demonstrated ability of the applicant and other
project partners to support the future capital and operating needs of
the corridor(s) being studied.

3.4 Selection Criteria

    In addition to the evaluation criteria outlined above that is
unique for each of the three project types covered by this notice, the
FRA Administrator will apply the following selection criteria to
further ensure that the projects selected for funding advance FRA's
current mission and key priorities
Alignment with the DOT Strategic Goals and Priorities
     Improving transportation safety;
     Maintaining transportation infrastructure in a state of
good repair;
     Promoting economic competitiveness;
     Advancing environmentally sustainable transportation
policies;
     Furthering the six ``Livability Principles'' developed by
DOT with the Department of Housing and Urban

Development and the Environmental Protection Agency as part of the
Partnership for Sustainable Communities;\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ http://www.sustainablecommunities.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Enhancing quality of life; and
     Building ladders of opportunity to expand the middle
class. Proposed projects and planning studies that demonstrate the
ability to provide reliable, safe and affordable transportation choices
to connect economically disadvantaged populations, non-drivers, senior
citizens, and persons with disabilities in disconnected communities
with employment, training and education will receive particular
consideration during project selection.
Project Delivery Performance
     The applicant's track record in successfully delivering
previous FRA and DOT grants on time, on budget, and for the full
intended scope;
     The applicant's means for achieving satisfactory
continuing control over project assets in a timely manner, including,
but not limited to, public ownership of project assets or agreements
with railroad operators and infrastructure owners at the time of
application; and
     The extent to which the proposed project complements
previous FRA or DOT awards.
Region/Location
     The extent to which the proposed project increases the
economic productivity of land, capital, or labor at specific locations,
particularly in economically distressed areas;
     Ensuring appropriate level of regional balance across the
country;
     Ensuring consistency with national transportation and rail
network objectives; and
     Ensuring integration with other rail services and
transportation modes.
Innovation/Resource Development
     Pursuing new rail technologies that result in favorable
public return on investment and ensure delivery of project benefits;
     Promoting innovations that demonstrate the value of new
approaches to, among other things, transportation funding and finance,
contracting, project delivery, congestion management, safety
management, asset management, or long-term operations and maintenance;
     Advancing the state of the art in modeling techniques for
assessing costs and benefits;
     Promoting domestic manufacturing, supply, and industrial
development; and
     Developing professional railroad engineering, operating,
planning, and management capacity.
Partnerships
     For projects that span multiple jurisdictions (States or
local governments), emphasizing those that have organized multi-
jurisdictional partnerships with joint planning and prioritization of
investments;
     Strengthening human capital and workforce opportunities,
particularly for low-income workers or for people in economically
distressed areas;
     Employing creative approaches to ensure workforce
diversity and use of disadvantaged and minority business enterprises,
including opportunities for small businesses and disadvantaged business
enterprises, including veteran-owned small businesses and service-
disabled veteran-owned small businesses; and
     Engaging local communities and other stakeholder groups in
the project in a way that offers an opportunity for meaningful
engagement in the process.

Section 4: Application and Submission Information

4.1 Submission Dates and Times

    Complete applications must be submitted to Grants.gov no later than
5:00 p.m. EDT, September 15, 2014. Applicants are strongly encouraged
to apply early to ensure that all materials are received before this
deadline.

4.2 Application Procedures

    To apply for funding through Grants.gov, applicants must be
properly registered. Complete instructions on how to register and
submit an application can be found at Grants.gov. Registering with
Grants.gov is a one-time process; however, it can take up to several
weeks for first-time registrants to receive confirmation and a user
password. FRA recommends that applicants start the registration process
as early as possible to prevent delays that may preclude submitting an
application package by the application deadline. Applications will not
be accepted after the due date. Delayed registration is not an
acceptable justification for an application extension.
    In order to apply for funding under this announcement and to apply
for funding through Grants.gov, all applicants are required to complete
the following:
    1. Acquire a DUNS Number. A Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS)
number is required for Grants.gov registration. The Office of
Management and Budget requires that all businesses and nonprofit
applicants for Federal funds include a DUNS number in their
applications for a new award or renewal of an existing award. A DUNS
number is a unique nine-digit sequence recognized as the universal
standard for identifying and keeping track of entities receiving
Federal funds. The identifier is used for tracking purposes and to
validate address and point of contact information for Federal
assistance applicants, recipients, and sub recipients. The DUNS number
will be used throughout the grant life cycle. Obtaining a DUNS number
is a free, one-time activity. Applicants may obtain a DUNS number by
calling 1-866-705-5711 or by applying online at http://www.dnb.com/us.
    2. Acquire or Renew Registration with the System for Award
Management (SAM) Database. All applicants for Federal financial
assistance must maintain current registrations in the System for Award
Management (SAM) database. An applicant must be registered in SAM to
successfully register in Grants.gov. The SAM database is the repository
for standard information about Federal financial assistance applicants,
recipients, and sub recipients. Organizations that have previously
submitted applications via Grants.gov are already registered with SAM,
as it is a requirement for Grants.gov registration. Please note,
however, that applicants must update or renew their SAM registration at
least once per year to maintain an active status, so it is critical to
check registration status well in advance of the application deadline.
Information about SAM registration procedures can be accessed at
www.sam.gov.
    3. Acquire an Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) and a
Grants.gov Username and Password. Applicants must complete an AOR
profile on Grants.gov and create a username and password. Applicants
must use the organization's DUNS number to complete this step.
Additional information about the registration process is available at
www.grants.gov/applicants/get_registered.jsp.
    4. Acquire Authorization for your AOR from the E-Business Point of
Contact (E-Biz POC). The Applicant's E-Biz POC must log in to
Grants.gov to confirm a representative as an AOR. Please note that
there can be more than one AOR at an organization.
    5. Search for the Funding Opportunity on Grants.gov. The Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for

this opportunity is 20.314, titled ``Railroad Development.''
    6. Submit an Application Addressing All of the Requirements
Outlined in this Funding Availability Announcement. After submitting
the application through Grants.gov, a confirmation screen will appear
on the applicant's computer screen. This screen will confirm that the
applicant has submitted an application and provide a tracking number to
track the status of the submission. Within 24 to 48 hours after
submitting an electronic application, an applicant should receive an
email validation message from Grants.gov. The validation message will
explain whether the application has been received and validated or
rejected, with an explanation. Applicants are urged to submit an
application at least 72 hours prior to the due date of the application
to allow time to receive the validation message and to correct any
problems that may have caused a rejection notification.
    If an applicant experiences difficulties at any point during this
process, please call the Grants.gov Customer Center Hotline at 1-800-
518-4726, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (closed on Federal holidays).
    Note: Please use generally accepted formats such as .pdf, .doc,
.docx, .xls, .xlsx and .ppt, when uploading attachments. While
applicants may imbed picture files, such as .jpg, .gif, and .bmp, in
document files, please do not submit attachments in these formats.
Additionally, the following formats will not be accepted: .com, .bat,
.exe, .vbs, .cfg, .dat, .db, .dbf, .dll, .ini, .log, .ora, .sys, and
.zip.

4.3 Content of Application

    Required documents for the application package are outlined in the
checklist below. Applicants are encouraged to visit the FY14 Grant
Application Solicitation homepage on the FRA Web site to download the
required Statement of Work template, FRA's Additional Assurances and
Certifications, and the OMB Standard Forms. The FY14 Application
Solicitation homepage also contains additional guidance on the
application package and other relevant topics. The FY14 Grant
Application Solicitation homepage is located at www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0701. Detailed requirements for completing the Project Narrative are
located below in Section 4.3.1. Brief overviews of the Statement of
Work and Spatial Data submission requirements are provided in Sections
4.3.2 and 4.3.3, respectively.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             Project Type
                                                     -----------------------------------------------------------
                      Documents                         Grade Crossing                             Corridor
                                                         improvements             PTC          investment plans
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    FRA Forms
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ballot] Project Narrative (see 4.3.1)..............            [check]             [check]             [check]
[ballot] Statement of Work (see 4.3.2)..............            [check]             [check]             [check]
[ballot] Spatial Data (see 4.3.3)...................            [check]   ..................           Optional
[ballot] FRA's Additional Assurances and                        [check]             [check]             [check]
 Certifications.....................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               OMB Standard Forms
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ballot] SF 424: Application for Federal Assistance.            [check]             [check]             [check]
[ballot] SF 424A: Budget Information-Non              ..................            [check]             [check]
 Construction.......................................
[ballot] SF 424B: Assurances-Non Construction.......  ..................            [check]             [check]
[ballot] SF 424C: Budget Information-Construction...            [check]   ..................  ..................
[ballot] SF 424D: Assurances-Construction...........            [check]   ..................  ..................
[ballot] SF LLL: Disclosure of Lobbying Activities..            [check]             [check]             [check]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Applicants must complete and submit all components of the
application package. FRA welcomes the submission of other relevant
supporting documentation that may have been developed by the applicant
(planning, NEPA, engineering and design documentation, letters of
support, etc.). In particular, applications accompanied by completed
feasibility studies, environmental determinations, and cost estimates
may be more favorably considered during the evaluation process, as they
demonstrate that an applicant has a greater understanding of the scope
and cost of the project.
    Applicants should submit all application materials through
Grants.gov. For any required or supporting application materials that
an applicant is unable to submit via Grants.gov (such as oversized
engineering drawings), an applicant may submit an original and two (2)
copies to Mary Ann Mcnamara, Office of Program Delivery, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Mail Stop 20,
Washington, DC 20590. However, due to delays caused by enhanced
screening of mail delivered via the U.S. Postal Service, applicants are
advised to use other means of conveyance (such as courier service) to
assure timely receipt of materials.
4.3.1 Project Narrative
    The following points describe the minimum content which will be
required in the Project Narrative component of grant applications
(additionally, FRA recommends that the Project Narrative generally
adhere to the following outline). These requirements must be satisfied
through a narrative statement submitted by the applicant, and may be
supported by spreadsheet documents, tables, maps, drawings, and other
materials, as appropriate. The Project Narrative may not exceed 25
pages in length (including any appendices). Applications containing
Project Narratives that exceed this 25 page limitation will not be
reviewed or considered for award.
    The FRA recommends that applicants read this section carefully and
submit all required information. In addition to the following nine
standard elements that must be included in all Project Narratives,
applications for intercity passenger rail grade crossing improvement
projects have additional unique requirements that must be addressed in
the Project Narrative. These additional requirements are outlined
following the standard Project Narrative elements below:
    1. Include a title page that lists the following elements in either
a table or formatted list: project title, location (city, State,
district), type of application

(e.g. grade crossing improvement, positive train control
implementation, Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan), the applicant
organization name, the name of any co-applicants, and the amount of
Federal funding requested and the proposed non-Federal match.
    2. Designate a point of contact for the applicant and provide his
or her name and contact information, including phone number, mailing
address and email address. The point of contact must be an employee of
an eligible applicant.
    3. Indicate the amount of Federal funding requested, the proposed
non-Federal match, and total project cost. Additionally, identify any
other sources of Federal funds committed to the project, as well as any
pending Federal requests. Make sure to also note if the requested
Federal funding must be obligated or expended by a certain date due to
dependencies or relationships with other Federal or non-Federal funding
sources, related projects, or other factors. Finally, specify whether
Federal funding has ever previously been sought for the project and not
secured, and name the Federal program and fiscal year from which the
funding was requested.
    4. Explain how the applicant meets the respective applicant
eligibility criteria for the type of funding requested, as outlined in
Section 3 of this notice.
    5. Provide a brief 4-6 sentence summary of the proposed project,
capturing the transportation challenges the proposed project aims to
address, as well as the intended outcomes and anticipated benefits that
will result from the proposed project.
    6. Include a detailed project description that expands upon the
brief summary required above. This detailed description should provide,
at a minimum, additional background on the transportation challenges
the project aims to address, the expected users and beneficiaries of
the project, the specific components and elements of the project, and
any other information the applicant deems necessary to justify the
proposed project. The detailed description should also clearly explain
how the proposed project meets the respective project eligibility
criteria for the type of funding requested, as outlined in Section 3 of
this notice.
    7. Include a thorough discussion of how the project meets all of
the evaluation criteria for the respective project type, as outlined in
Section 3 of this notice. Applicants should note that FRA reviews
applications based upon the evaluation criteria. If an application does
not sufficiently address the evaluation criteria, it is unlikely to be
a competitive application. In responding to the criteria, applicants
are reminded to clearly identify, quantify, and compare expected
benefits and costs of proposed projects. The FRA understands that the
level of detail and sophistication of analysis that should be expected
for relatively small projects (i.e., those encouraged to be limited to
under $3,000,000 in this notice) is less than for larger, multi-million
dollar, investments.
    8. Describe proposed project implementation and project management
arrangements. Include descriptions of the expected arrangements for
project contracting, contract oversight, change-order management, risk
management, and conformance to Federal requirements for project
progress reporting.
    9. Describe anticipated environmental or historic preservation
impacts associated with the proposed project (or underlying projects
for Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plans), any environmental or
historic preservation analyses that have been prepared, and progress
toward completing any environmental documentation or clearance required
for the proposed project under the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), section 4(f) of
the DOT Act, the Clean Water Act, or other applicable Federal or State
laws. Applicants and grantees under FRA's financial assistance programs
are encouraged to contact FRA and obtain preliminary direction
regarding the appropriate NEPA class of action and required
environmental documentation. Generally, projects will be ineligible to
receive funding if they have begun construction activities prior to the
applicant/grantee receiving written approval from FRA that all
environmental and historical analyses have been completed. Additional
information regarding FRA's environmental processes and requirements
can be located on the FY14 Grant Application Solicitation homepage at
www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0701.
Additional Project Narrative Requirements for Intercity Passenger Rail
Grade Crossing Improvement Applications
    In addition to the nine standard Project Narrative elements
required above, applicants for intercity passenger rail grade crossing
improvement projects must specify the following location and crossing
characteristics of the proposed grade crossing project (if the proposed
project involves multiple crossings, the following information must be
provided for each crossing):
     Locality--City/town, county, and cross streets;
     Right-of-Way Owner--Railroad right-of-way owner/host
railroad, railroad milepost number, and DOT crossing inventory number;
     Crossing Characteristics--Number of railroad tracks,
number of roadway traffic lanes, existing traffic control devices,
average annual daily traffic (and year calculated), volume of truck
traffic, and the history of train-vehicle and train-pedestrian
accidents at the crossing (including fatalities);
     Rail Service Characteristics--Existing and planned rail
services within the project boundaries (freight, commuter, and
intercity passenger rail service), name of the corresponding service
operators, existing and planned top operating speeds, and average
number of daily one-way train operations (i.e. one daily round trip
should be counted as two daily one-way operations); and
     Areas of significant concern--Schools, hospitals, first
responders, or other emergency services providers in the vicinity of
the crossing.
4.3.2 Statement of Work
    Applicants are required to submit a Statement of Work (SOW) that
addresses the scope, schedule, and budget for the proposed project if
it were to be selected for award. The SOW should contain sufficient
detail so that both FRA and the applicant can understand the expected
outcomes of the proposed work to be performed and monitor progress
toward completing project tasks and deliverables during a prospective
grant's period of performance. The FRA has developed SOW templates for
each of the three project types covered under this notice that
applicants must adhere to if they wish to be considered for award. The
SOW templates are located on the FY14 Grant Application Solicitation
homepage at www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0701.
4.3.3 Spatial Data
    Applicants for intercity passenger rail grade crossing improvement
projects are required to submit spatial data concerning their proposed
projects to the FRA. This data allows the FRA to quickly orient the
locations of grade crossings on the railroad and surrounding
environment, and will assist the FRA in the review of applications.
While not required, applicants for Passenger Rail Corridor Investment
Plans are also encouraged to

submit spatial data for any potential routes under consideration in the
planning study, if known. Spatial data must be submitted to the FRA
through grants.gov in either shapefile or Keyhole Markup Language (KML)
file formats, utilizing the World Geodetic System (WGS) 84 datum
standard. Additional guidance and instructions concerning the
submission of spatial data is available on the FY14 Grant Application
Solicitation homepage at www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0701.

Section 5: Award Administration Information

5.1 Award Notices

    Applications selected for funding will be announced after the
application review period. FRA will contact applicants with successful
applications after announcement with information and instructions about
the award process. Notification of a selected application is not an
authorization to begin proposed project activities.
    The period of performance for grants awarded under this notice is
dependent upon the project and will be determined on a grant-by-grant
basis. Extensions to the period of performance will be considered only
through written requests to the FRA with specific and compelling
justifications for why an extension is required. Any obligated funding
that has not been spent by the grantee and reimbursed by the FRA upon
completion of the grant will be deobligated.

5.2 Administrative and National Policy Requirements

    The grantee and any subgrantee must comply with all applicable laws
and regulations. A non-exclusive list of administrative and national
policy requirements that grantees must follow includes: Procurement
standards, compliance with Federal civil rights laws and regulations,
disadvantaged business enterprises (DBE), debarment and suspension,
drug-free workplace, FRA's and OMB's Assurances and Certifications,
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), labor standards, safety
oversight, environmental protection, National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), environmental justice, and Buy America or Buy American
provisions (as applicable).

5.3 General Requirements

    The grantee must comply with all post-award reporting, auditing,
monitoring, and close-out requirements, as described on the FY14 Grant
Application Solicitation homepage at www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0701.

Section 6: Agency Contact

    For further information regarding this notice and the grants
program, please contact Mary Ann McNamara, Office of Program Delivery,
Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Mail Stop
20, Washington, DC 20590; Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Phone: (202)
493-6393; Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Authority: Sec. 192, Pub. L. 113-76, 128 Stat. 603; Pub. L. 111-
117, 123 Stat. 3056-57; Pub. L. 111-8, 123 Stat. 934-5; Pub. L. 110-
161, 121 Stat. 2393-4.

Corey Hill,
Director, Office of Program Delivery.
[FR Doc. 2014-16172 Filed 7-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P