[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 13 (Tuesday, January 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3427-3429]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00985]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-71296; File No. SR-Topaz-2014-02]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Topaz Exchange, LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Establish
a Billing Dispute Practice

January 14, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on January 8, 2014, the Topaz Exchange, LLC (d/b/a ISE Gemini)
(the ``Exchange'' or ``Topaz'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Topaz is proposing to amend its Schedule of Fees to establish a
billing practice with respect to billing disputes. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at http://www.ise.com, at the principal

office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects
of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Schedule of Fees to establish a
billing practice to prevent members from contesting their bills long
after they have been sent an invoice. In accordance with the proposed
rule change, members must submit all disputes no later than ninety
calendar days after receipt of an Exchange invoice. After ninety
calendar days, all fees assessed by the Exchange will be considered
final. The Exchange provides members with both daily and monthly fee
reports and thus believes members should be aware of any potential
billing errors within ninety calendar days of receiving an invoice.
Requiring that members dispute an invoice within this time period will
encourage them to promptly review their invoices so that any disputed
charges can be addressed in a timely manner while the information and
data underlying those charges (e.g., applicable fees and order
information) is still easily and readily available. This practice will
avoid issues that may arise when members do not dispute an invoice in a
timely manner, and will conserve Exchange resources that would have to
be expended to resolve untimely billing disputes. The Exchange notes
that this type of provision is common among many other exchanges, which
require that members dispute invoices within as few as sixty days.\3\
In addition, the Exchange proposes to state that all billing disputes
must be submitted to the Exchange in writing,\4\ and must be
accompanied by supporting documentation. The Exchange believes that
this requirement, which is also similar to requirements of other
exchanges,\5\ will further streamline the billing dispute process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62661 (August
6, 2010), 75 FR 49544 (August 13, 2010) (SR-Phlx-2010-110).
    \4\ The Exchange invoice specifies contact information for
billing inquiries.
    \5\ See supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\6\ in general, and with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\
in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange
believes the requirement that all billing disputes must be submitted in
writing, and with supporting documentation, within ninety calendar days
from receipt of the invoice is reasonable in the public interest
because the Exchange provides ample tools to properly and swiftly
monitor and account for various charges incurred in a given month.
Moreover, the proposed billing dispute language, which will lower the
Exchange's administrative burden, is substantially similar to billing
dispute language adopted by other exchanges.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \8\ See supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\9\ the Exchange does
not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on
intermarket or intramarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As stated above,
the proposed rule change, which applies equally to all members, is
intended to reduce the Exchange's administrative burden, and is
substantially similar to rules adopted by other options exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\11\
Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \13\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\14\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative
delay so that the proposal may become operative upon filing. The
Exchange states that waiver of the operative delay is consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest because it will
permit the Exchange to establish an administrative billing practice
consistent with current billing practices employed by other options
exchanges. The Exchange also notes that the regular 30-day operative
period is not necessary as, under the terms of the proposed rule
change, members will have ninety calendar days from the receipt of
their next invoice to dispute their bills. Based on the Exchange
representations above, the Commission waives the 30-day operative delay
requirement and designates the proposed rule change as operative upon
filing.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) \16\
of the Act to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Topaz-2014-02 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Topaz-2014-02. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Topaz-2014-02 and should be
submitted on or before February 11, 2014.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-00985 Filed 1-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


INCIDENT REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH

Quaternary Ammonium Compounds

(Quats)

February 15, 2006

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pesticide Programs

Antimicrobials Division

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  TOC \o "1-3" \h \z \u    HYPERLINK \l "_Toc127791271"  0.0
INTRODUCTION	  PAGEREF _Toc127791271 \h  3

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc127791272"  1.0 	INCIDENT REPORT DATA ASSOCIATED
WITH HEALTH EFFECTS	  PAGEREF _Toc127791272 \h  3

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc127791273"  1.1	OPP’s Incident Data System (IDS)
PAGEREF _Toc127791273 \h  4

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc127791274"  1.2	California Data - 1982 through 2003
 PAGEREF _Toc127791274 \h  4

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc127791275"  1.3 	National Pesticide
Telecommunications Network (NPTN)	  PAGEREF _Toc127791275 \h  4

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc127791276"  1.4 	Incident Reports Associated with
Acute Toxic Effects of Quats Published in Scientific Literature.
PAGEREF _Toc127791276 \h  4

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc127791277"  2.0 	SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION	  PAGEREF
_Toc127791277 \h  5

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc127791278"  3.0 	REFERENCES	  PAGEREF _Toc127791278
\h  8

0.0	INTRODUCTION tc \l1 "0.0	INTRODUCTION

Quaternary ammonium compounds (Quats) are widely used industrial
chemicals.  The purpose of this chapter is to review the evidence of
health effects in humans resulting from exposure to Quats. As stated in
the PR Notice 88-1 (February 26, 1988), the Agency has clustered Quats
into four categories:

Group I.  	Alkyl or hydroxyalkyl (straight chain) substituted quats;

Group II.	Non-halogenated benzyl substituted quats;

Group III. 	Di- and tri-chlorobenzyl substituted quats; and

Group IV.	Quats with unusual substituents.

However for the available incident information, it is difficult to
differentiate the specific members of the Quats that are involved in
each incident.  Therefore, in preparing this report, all the quats are
going to be discussed together.

1.0 	INCIDENT REPORT DATA ASSOCIATED WITH HEALTH EFFECTS

The following databases have been consulted for the poisoning incident
data on the quats:

Incident Data System (IDS) - The Incident Data System of The Office of
Pesticide Programs (OPP) of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
contains reports of incidents from various sources, including
registrants, other federal and state health and environmental agencies
and individual consumers, submitted to OPP since 1992.  Reports
submitted to the Incident Data System represent anecdotal reports or
allegations only, unless otherwise stated.  Typically no conclusions can
be drawn implicating the pesticide as a cause of any of the reported
health effects.  Nevertheless, sometimes with enough cases and/or enough
documentation risk mitigation measures may be suggested.

California Department of Pesticide Regulation - California has collected
uniform data on suspected pesticide poisonings since 1982.  Physicians
are required, by statute, to report to their local health officer all
occurrences of illness suspected of being related to exposure to
pesticides.  The majority of the incidents involve workers.  Information
on exposure (worker activity), type of illness (systemic, eye, skin,
eye/skin and respiratory), likelihood of a causal relationship, and
number of days off work and in the hospital are provided.

National Pesticide Telecommunications Network (NPTN) - NPTN is a
toll-free information service supported by OPP.  A ranking of the top
200 active ingredients for which telephone calls were received during
calendar years 1984-1991, inclusive, has been prepared.  The total
number of calls was tabulated for the categories human incidents, animal
incidents, calls for information, and others.

Published Incident Reports - Some incident reports associated with quats
related human health hazards are published in the scientific literature.

1.1	OPP’s Incident Data System (IDS) tc \l2 "1.1 	OPPs Incident Data
System (IDS)

There are 1,584 incidences that have been reported in the OPP Incident
Data System associated with quats exposure.

Dermal, ocular and inhalation are the primary routes of exposure.   Most
of the incidences are related to irritation type reactions.  The most
common symptoms reported for cases of dermal exposure were skin
irritation/burning, rash, itching, skin discoloration/redness and
blistering.  Some allergic type reactions including hives and allergic
contact dermatitis have also been reported.  The most common symptoms
reported for cases of ocular exposure were eye irritation/burning, eye
pain and swelling of eyes.  The most common symptoms reported for cases
of inhalation exposure were respiratory irritation/burning, irritation
to mouth/throat/nose, coughing/choking, shortness of breath, dizziness,
flu like symptoms, and headache.

1.2	California Data - 1982 through 2003

There are 1,105 incidences that have been reported in the California
Pesticide Surveillance Program Database (1982-2003) as definitely,
probably, or possibly related to quats (Mehler, 2005). A summary table
describing each incident is attached in Attachment 1.  As summarized in
Table 1, symptoms associated with the eyes are the primary reported
illness (over 50%) in all the associated incidences.

Nausea, headache, and sore throat are the primary systemic effects that
have been reported. The primary dermal effects that have been reported
are rash, burning sensation, numbness, and itching. As summarized in
Table 2, although there are some people who were unable to work after
exposure for a certain period of time, no one was hospitalized.

1.3 	National Pesticide Telecommunications Network (NPTN) tc \l2 "1.4
National Pesticide Telecommunications Network (NPTN)

There are no incidents reported in the NPTN database related to quats
exposure.

1.4 	Incident Reports Associated with Acute Toxic Effects of Quats
Published in the Scientific Literature

There are several incidents that have been published outlining the
problems associated with the use of quats.  Most of the reported
incidents are associated with irritation type reactions (Preller et al.,
1996).  Some incidents are associated with allergic type reactions
through dermal exposure (Dibo and Brasch, 2001; Shmunes and Levy, 1972)
or eye exposure (Orlandini, et al. 1990).

2.0 	SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

There are many incident reports associated with exposure to end-use
products containing quats. Dermal, ocular and inhalation are the primary
routes of exposure.   Most of the incidences are related to irritation.
Allergic type reactions have also been reported in some incidents.

Although risks associated with eye exposure are not assessed in the risk
assessment process, symptoms associated with the eyes are the most
commonly reported symptoms associated with quats exposure.  The most
common symptoms reported for cases of ocular exposure were eye
irritation/burning, eye pain, conjunctivitis, swelling of the eye and
swelling of the eyelid.

The most common symptoms reported for cases of inhalation exposure were
respiratory irritation/burning, irritation to mouth/throat/nose,
coughing/choking, chest pain, disorientation, dizziness, and shortness
of breath.

The most common symptoms reported for cases of dermal exposure were skin
irritation/burning, rash, itching, and blistering.  Allergic type
reactions including hives and allergic contact dermatitis have also been
reported.

Although oral exposure is considered a minor route of exposure for quats
use, irritation to mouth/throat/nose, vomiting/nausea/abdominal pain,
dizziness, and headache have been reported in the cases of ingestion.

 tc \l2 "1.5 	Incident Reports Associated with Acute Toxic Effects of
Hydantoins Published in Scientific Literature.

Table 1.  Cases Due to Quaternary Ammonium Compound Exposure in
California Reported by Type of Illness and Year, 1982-2003

Year	Illness Type

	Systemic a	Eye	Skin b	Respiratory	Combination c	Total

1982	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	2

1983	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	4

1984	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	3

1985	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	2

1986	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	2

1987	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	23

1988	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	53

1989	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	67

1990	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	86

1991	1	53	22	4	-	81

1992	4	40	14	3	3	71

1993	4	54	16	1	3	79

1994	3	62	21	1	2	88

1995	4	61	18	5	-	89

1996	2	43	20	1	1	67

1997	2	53	14	6	3	75

1998	3	43	16	6	3	66

1999	4	32	11	5	4	47

2000	2	25	17	3	1	46

2001	1	30	8	2	3	36

2002	4	22	10	6	4	39

2003	14	49	18	7	13	72

Total

(1991-2003)	48	567	205	50	40	856

Total

(1882-2003)	-	-	-	-	-	1105

a Category includes cases where nausea, sore throat, dizziness, headache
and other systemic effects occurred.

b Category includes burning sensation, numbness, itching, and discolored
(white/brownish) skin.

c Category includes combined effects to eye, skin,  respiratory and/or
systemic effects.

 d ND = No available information.  Before 1991, there is no clear
medical description of all the related symptoms for all the related
incidents.Table 2:

Number of Persons Disabled (taking time off work) or Hospitalized for
Indicated Number of Days after Quaternary Ammonium Compound Exposure in
California, 1982-2003.

Number of Persons Disabled

Number of Persons Hospitalized

One day	89

1

Two days	54

1

3-5 days	44

1

6-10 days	17

-

11 – 15 days	6

-

More than 15 days	5

-

Indefinite a	6

-

Unknownb	24

1

Note:

(a) An entry of indefinite indicates the event occurred, but the time
period is not known.

(b) An entry of unknown indicates no information was provided.

3.0 	REFERENCES

Dibo, M. and Brasch, J.  2001.  Occupational allergic contact dermatitis
from N,N-bis93-aminoprpyl) dodecylamine and dimethyldidecylammonium
chloride in two hospital staff.  Contact Dermatitis 45(1): 40.

Mehler, L. 2005.  Personal Communication.  California Department of
Pesticide Regulation.

Oriandini, A.; Viotti, G.  Martinoli, C; and Magno, L.  1990.  Allergic
Contact Conjunctivitis from synthetic detergents in nurse.  Contact
Dermatitis 23: 376-377.

Preller, L.; Doekers, G.; Heederik, D.; Vermulen, R.; Vogelzang, P.F.J,
and Boleij, J. S.M.  1996. Disinfectant use as a risk factor for atopic
sensitization and symptoms consistent with asthma: an epidemiological
study.  European Respiratory Journal 9(7): 1407-1413.

Shmunes, E. and Levy, E.J.  1972.  Quaternary ammonium compound contact
dermatitis from deodorant.  Arch Dermatol. 105(1): 91-93.

 tc \l2 "1.5 	Incident Reports Associated with Toxic Effects of phenols
Published in Scientific Literature.

Attachment 1

Case Reports Received by the California Pesticide Illness Surveillance
Program,

1982 - 2003

In Which Health Effects Were Definitely, Probably, or Possibly
Attributed to

Exposure to Quaternary Ammonium Compounds (Quats)

 PAGE

 PAGE  9


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25533-25534]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10300]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2012-0046]

Agency Requests for Approval of a New Information Collection(s):
Human Subjects Experiments Related to Keyless Ignition Controls, Gear
Selection Controls, and Audible Warnings

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation (DOT) invites public comments
about our intention to request Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
approval for a new information collection. The collection involves
recruitment of participants, balancing the subject sample and
debriefing questionnaires. The information to be collected will be used
to balance the participants between younger and older age groups,
genders and previous driving experience with keyless ignition, or lack
thereof. These observational experiments are being conducted in support
of current agency regulatory efforts that contemplate revising Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 114 (Docket No. NHTSA-2011-0174 RIN
2127-AK88). We are required to publish this notice in the Federal
Register by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by June 29, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by Docket No. NHTSA-
2012-0046] through one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: 1<PHONE_NUMBER>
     Mail or Hand Delivery: Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gayle Dalrymple, NVS-123, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2127-New.
    Title: Human Subjects Experiments Related to Keyless Ignition
Controls, Gear Selection Controls and Audible Warnings.
    Form Numbers: n/a.
    Type of Review: New Information Collection.
    Background: NHTSA has initiated research and rulemaking to address
these issues related to consumer confusion when using ignition systems
in which there is no physical key: Inability to shut off the engine
and/or shift to neutral during unintended acceleration events, leaving
the vehicle not in ``park'' and inadvertently leaving the vehicle
without shutting off the propulsion system.\1\ Evaluations of driver
use of push-button start/stop controls and electronically shifted
transmissions are required to support this rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Docket NHTSA-2011-0174 available at www.regulations.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Human factors observational experiments are proposed to examine
these issues. The Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (Volpe
Center), which is a component of the U.S. DOT, Research and Innovative
Technology Administration (RITA), has been funded to conduct this
research under an Inter-Agency Agreement (IAA) with NHTSA. Under a task
order contract with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT),
these experiments will be conducted in a simulator at the Volpe Center
by staff of the MIT Age Lab. The collection of information consists of:
(1) Recruitment material and a brief eligibility questionnaire for
applicants and (2) debriefing questionnaire for participants. Applicant
responses to the eligibility questionnaire will be used to balance the
subject sample demographically and between drivers who are na[iuml]ve
to keyless ignition, and those who are not. Subjects will be paid $20
to $75 depending on the required time commitment, and will be tested
and debriefed individually. The purpose of the debriefing is to probe
for insights into the factors that led to errors in the simulated
driving and participant reactions to mitigation measures such as
audible alarms.
    Respondents: The Age Lab has conducted numerous experiments related
to driving instrumented research vehicles and simulators, and has a
panel of more than 7,000 persons in the Boston area who have indicated
they would like to be participants in future experiments. Whenever the
Age Lab has a new experiment, an email blast is sent to all members of
this panel. The email

consists of a one-paragraph description of the experiment and the
eligibility requirements, along with a reply button that connects
respondents to the eligibility questionnaire. Typically, more persons
apply than are needed. Staff members from the Age Lab then contact
applicants individually by email to match them with available time
slots. For these experiments, the subject pool will be balanced across
age and gender. About two-thirds of the subjects will be na[iuml]ve to
cars with keyless ignition systems, while one-third will be owners of
vehicles with keyless ignitions systems.
    For evaluation of auditory warnings to prevent vehicle roll-away, a
very short test (one response per subject) is proposed. This testing
will be conducted in stationary vehicles in public parking lots using a
convenience sample drawn from passers-by.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: ~135 for keyless/PRNDL experiment.
~240 for roll-away warning experiment.
    Estimated Number of Responses: One response per respondent to 7 to
10 questions
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: Three minutes per respondent to
consider and respond to recruiting questions (18.75 hours total for
number of respondents needed for study, but a substantially larger and
unknown number may respond).
    Estimated Frequency: One time
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the Department's
performance, (b) the accuracy of the estimated burden, (c) ways for the
Department to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the
information collection and (d) ways that the burden could be minimized
without reducing the quality of the collected information. The agency
will summarize and/or include your comments in the request for OMB's
clearance of this information collection.

    Authority:  The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1:48.

    Issued on: April 24, 2012.
Christopher J. Bonanti,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2012-10300 Filed 4-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


TABLE 1 ANNUAL BURDEN OF REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS NESHAP SUBPART II  SHIP BUILDING AND REPAIR FACILITIES REPORTING/ RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT Hours/ Occurence ( A) Occurences/

Year ( B) Hours/ Year ( C= A* B)

( C) Respondents/

Year ( D) Technical Hours/ Year ( E= C* D)

( E) Managemen t Hours/ Year ( F= E*. 05)

( F) Clerical Hours/ Year ( G= E*. 1)

( G) Costs/ Year ( H)

1. APPLICATIONS N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 2. SURVEY AND STUDIES N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 3. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS a. Read Instructions 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 b. Required Activities  Included in 3e

c. Create Information  Included in 3e

d. Gather Existing Information  Included in 3e

e. Write Report Notification of Construction/ Reconstruction 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 Notification of physical/ operational change 2 1 2 0 NotifIcation of Anticipated Startup 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 Actual start up notification 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 Notification of Demonstration of CMS N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A Report of Performance Test N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A Initial notification and implementation 14 1 14 0 0 4. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS a. Read Instructions  Included in 3a

b. Plan Activities N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A c. Implement Activities 8 50 400 45 18,000 900 1,800 $ 1,117,386.00 d. Develop Record System 8 1 8 0 0 0 0 e. Train Personnel 28 1 28 45 1,260 63 126 $ 78,217.02 g. Audits N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN Total Hours = 22149 Total Cost = $ 1,195,603.02 Assumptions Number of affected facilities ( per year) 45 Costs assume a rate of $ 54.90/ hour for technical, $ 73.90/ hour for executive, and $ 34.42/ hour for clerical.

Rate of failed performance tests 20%

Number of new facilities ( per year) 0 Assumes an operating schedule of 50 weeks per year


[Federal Register: February 4, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 23)]
[Notices]
[Page 6499]
[DOCID:fr04fe08-40]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR08-13-000]

Houston Pipe Line Company, L.P.; Notice of Petition for Rate
Approval

January 28, 2008.
    Take notice that on January 22, 2008, Houston Pipe Line Company,
L.P. (HPL), filed a petition for approval of rates for transportation
service, pursuant to section 284.123(b)(2) of the Commission's
regulations. Commencing January 22, 2008, HPL requests that the
Commission approve a maximum interruptible transportation rate of
$0.3980 per MMBtu and a maximum fuel retention cap that varies by zone
from 0.01 percent to 0.83 percent.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken,
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time Monday, February 11, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-1928 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31268-31269]
[FR Doc No: E9-15382]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP09-432-000]

Tricor Ten Section Hub, LLC; Notice of Application

June 23, 2009.
    Take notice that on June 12, 2009, Tricor Ten Section Hub, LLC
(Tricor), 4675 MacArthur Court, Suite 670, Newport Beach, California
92660, filed in Docket Number CP09-432-000, pursuant to section 7(c) of
the Natural Gas Act (NGA), an application for a certificate of public
convenience and necessity to construct, own, and operate the Ten
Section Storage Project, located in Kern County, California.
Additionally, Tricor requests a blanket certificate authorizing it to
engage in certain self-implementing activities under part 157, subpart
F, and a blanket certificate under part 284, subpart G, authorizing
Tricor to provide open access, non-discriminatory firm and
interruptible natural gas storage services. Tricor also requests
authorization to charge market-based rates for its proposed storage
services and approval of its Pro Forma Gas Tariff. This filing is
available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or
may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions regarding this Application should be directed to
counsel for Tricor, Michael J. Manning or Letitia W. McKoy, Fulbright &
Jaworski, L.L.P., 801 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20004;
phone<PHONE_NUMBER> (Michael) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (Letitia); fax (202)
662-4643.
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding, or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify Federal and State agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all Federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the below listed comment date, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 14 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a
copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    Motions to intervene, protests and comments may be filed
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper; see, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.

    Comment Date: July 14, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-15382 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am]
 P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3759-3760]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1415]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice Announcing Filing Priority for Preliminary Permit
Applications

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Project
                                                                  No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FFP Project 30, LLC.........................................   12927-002
Northland Power Mississippi River LLC.......................   14075-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 17, 2012, the Commission held a drawing to determine
priority among competing preliminary permit applications with identical
filing times. In the event that the Commission concludes that none of
the applicants' plans are better adapted than the others

to develop, conserve, and utilize in the public interest the water
resources of the region at issue, the priority established by this
drawing will serve as the tiebreaker. Based on the drawing, the order
of priority is as follows:
    1. FFP Project 30, LLC; Project No. 12927-002.
    2. Northland Power Mississippi River LLC; Project No. 14075-000.

    Dated: January 18, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-1415 Filed 1-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 181 (Monday, September 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64267-64268]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22382]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2016-0097]

Public Meeting Regarding NHTSA's Research Portfolio

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Announcement of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NHTSA is announcing a public meeting to present information
describing our vehicle and behavioral safety research portfolio and
outline the activities we plan to pursue over the next 12 to 16 months.
Each year, NHTSA executes a broad array of research in the areas of
crash avoidance, electronics systems safety, biomechanics,
crashworthiness, and behavioral research. The purpose of this meeting
is to present and describe research projects in these areas that the
agency will be focusing on to enhance safety.

DATES: NHTSA will hold the public meeting on September 27, 2016, in
Detroit, MI. The meeting will start at 10:00 a.m. and continue until
4:00 p.m., local time. Check-in (through security) will begin at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Patrick V. McNamara Federal
Building located at 477 Michigan Avenue, Detroit, MI 48226, Bottom
Floor. This facility is accessible to individuals with disabilities.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about the public
meeting, please contact Inez Finley at<PHONE_NUMBER>, by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by U.S. Mail at NHTSA's Vehicle Research & Test
Center, P.O. Box B37, Building 60, 10820 State Route 347, East Liberty,
Ohio 43319.
    Registration is necessary for all attendees. Attendees should
register at https://goo.gl/forms/FEO60sf0tOQDBqlU2 by September 22,
2016. Please provide name, affiliation, email, and indicate whether you
require accommodations such as a sign language interpreter. Space is
limited, so advanced registration is highly encouraged.
    Should it be necessary to cancel the meeting due to inclement
weather or other emergency, NHTSA will take all available measures to
notify registered participants.
    NHTSA will conduct the public meeting informally, and technical
rules of evidence will not apply. We will arrange for a written
transcript of the meeting and keep the official record open for 30 days
after the meeting to allow submission of public comments. You may make
arrangements for copies of the transcripts directly with the court
reporter, and the transcript will also be posted in the docket when it
becomes available.
    Written Comments: Attendees are welcome to submit written comments
and other supporting information during the 30 day comment period.
Please submit all written comments no later than October 27, 2016 by
any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.

     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number. Note that all comments received will be posted without
change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided. Please see the Privacy Act discussion below.
    Docket: For access to the docket go to http://www.regulations.gov
at any time or to 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. Telephone: 202-366-
9826.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit
http://www.regulations.gov/privacy.html.
    Confidential Business Information: If you wish to submit any
information under a claim of confidentiality, you should submit three
copies of your complete submission, including the information you claim
to be confidential business information to the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, at
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. In addition, you
should submit two copies, from which you have deleted the claimed
confidential business information, to Docket Management at the address
given above. When you send a comment containing information claimed to
be confidential business information, you should submit a cover letter
setting forth the information specified in our confidential business
information regulation (49 CFR part 512).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Each year, NHTSA executes a broad array of research in the areas of
crash avoidance, electronics systems safety, biomechanics,
crashworthiness, and behavioral research. The purpose of this meeting
is to present and describe research projects in these areas that the
agency will be focusing on over the next year or more to enhance
vehicle safety. For more information on NHTSA's research programs,
please visit our Web site at: www.nhtsa.gov.

Draft Agenda

09:00-10:00--Arrival/Check-In
10:00-12:00--Morning Public Meeting Session (Crash Avoidance and
Electronic Systems Safety Research)
12:00-13:00--Lunch Break
13:00-15:30--Afternoon Public Meeting Session (Biomechanics,
Crashworthiness and Behavioral Safety Research)
15:30-16:00--Open discussion (Q&A)
16:00--Adjourn

Public Meeting Topics

    NHTSA will provide information on the following topics during the
morning and afternoon sessions of the meeting.
 Crash Avoidance Research (driver assistance systems, human
factors)
 Electronic Systems Safety/Emerging Technologies Research
(electronics reliability, cybersecurity, automated vehicles)
 Biomechanics/Human Injury Research
 Crashworthiness/Occupant Protection Research
 Behavioral Safety Research

    Issued in Washington DC on: September 13, 2016 under authority
delegated by 49 CFR 1.95.
Nathaniel Beuse,
Associate Administrator for Vehicle Safety Research.
[FR Doc. 2016-22382 Filed 9-16-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register: November 29, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 228)]
[Notices]
[Page 71564-71565]
[DOCID:fr29no05-105]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 1-31816]

Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application of Centennial Specialty
Foods Corporation To Withdraw Its Common Stock, $.0001 Par Value, From
Listing and Registration on the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc.

November 22, 2005.
    On November 4, 2005, Centennial Specialty Foods Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (``Issuer''), filed an application with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and
Rule 12d2-2(d) thereunder,\2\ to withdraw its common stock, $.0001 par
value (``Security''), from listing and registration on the Boston Stock
Exchange, Inc. (``BSE'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(d).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.12d2-2(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 1, 2004, the Board of Directors (``Board'') of the
Issuer approved resolutions on November 1, 2005 to withdraw the
Security from listing on BSE. The Issuer stated that the following
reason factored into the Board's decision to withdraw the Security from
BSE: (1) The Issuer was recently delisted from the Nasdaq Stock Market,
and as a result, BSE suspended trading in the Security on October 26,
2005; (2) the Issuer does not believe it will be able to comply with
BSE's requirement to have an audit committee composed of at least three
independent board members; and (3) in order to reduce costs, the Issuer
expects to terminate its obligations to file reports with the
Commission or otherwise be subjected to the Act through filing of Form
15 with the Commission.
    The Issuer stated in its application that it has complied with Rule
12d-2-2(d) under the Act \3\ by complying with all applicable laws in
the State of Delaware, the state in which the Issuer is incorporated,
and by providing BSE with the required documents governing the
withdrawal of securities from listing and registration on BSE. The
Issuer's

application relates solely to the withdrawal of the Security from
listing on BSE and shall not affect its obligation to be registered
under Section 12(b) of the Act.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See id.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any interested person may, on or before December 15, 2005 comment
on the facts bearing upon whether the application has been made in
accordance with the rules of BSE, and what terms, if any, should be
imposed by the Commission for the protection of investors. All comment
letters may be submitted by either of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
the File Number 1-31816 or;

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-9303.
    All submissions should refer to File Number 1-31816. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help us process and review your comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the
Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/delist.shtml).

Comments are also available for public inspection and copying in the
Commission's Public Reference Room. All comments received will be
posted without change; we do not edit personal identifying information
from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to
make available publicly.
    The Commission, based on the information submitted to it, will
issue an order granting the application after the date mentioned above,
unless the Commission determines to order a hearing on the matter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(1).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\5\
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-6662 Filed 11-28-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21730-21732]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9306]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1917-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: J-2 Lateral Description to be effective 5/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/29/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110329-5140.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1918-000.
    Applicants: Pine Needle LNG Company, LLC.
    Description: Pine Needle LNG Company, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.403(d)(2): PN 2011 Electric Power and Fuel Tracker Filing to be
effective 5/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/30/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110330-5035.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1919-000.
    Applicants: Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company.
    Description: Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Penalty Revenue Credits Timeline to be
effective 4/29/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/30/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110330-5055.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1920-000.
    Applicants: Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company LLC submits tariff
filing per 154.204: Enterprise K12 Negotiated Rate Agreement Amendment
Filing to be effective 4/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/30/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110330-5106.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1921-000.
    Applicants: Vector Pipeline L.P.
    Description: Annual Fuel Use Report of Vector Pipeline L.P.
    Filed Date: 03/30/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110330-5116.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1922-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Non-Conforming Agreement--Patriots Energy
Group to be effective 4/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/30/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110330-5189.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1923-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Negotiated Rate Agreement--Patriots Energy
Group to be effective 4/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/30/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110330-5202.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1924-000.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: ANR Pipeline Company submits tariff filing per
154.403(d)(2): DTCA 2011 to be effective 5/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110331-5048.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1925-000.
    Applicants: Northern Border Pipeline Company.
    Description: Northern Border Pipeline Company submits tariff filing
per 154.403(d)(2): CSU Fuel Filing to be effective 5/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110331-5049.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1926-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.203: 85 North Expansion Project--Phase 2 Rate
Filing to be effective 5/1/2011.

    Filed Date: 03/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110331-5050.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1927-000.
    Applicants: National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation.
    Description: National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 2011 April IG Filing to be effective 4/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110331-5053.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1928-000.
    Applicants: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company, LLC
submits tariff filing per 154.403: CEGT LLC--Revenue Crediting, to be
effective 5/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110331-5056.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1929-000.
    Applicants: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company Amended
2010 Penalty Crediting Report.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110331-5068.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1930-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Penalty Revenue Crediting Report of Natural Gas
Pipeline Company of America.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110331-5070.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1931-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: TETLP Cleanup Filing March 2011 to be effective 5/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110331-5073.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1932-000.
    Applicants: Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP.
    Description: Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP submits tariff
filing per 154.203: Annual Flow-Through of Cash-Out Revenues to be
effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110331-5074.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1933-000.
    Applicants: Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP.
    Description: Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP submits tariff
filing per 154.203: Annual Report of Flow- Through of Penalty Revenues
to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110331-5075.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1934-000.
    Applicants: Ozark Gas Transmission, L.L.C.
    Description: Ozark Gas Transmission, L.L.C. submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Negotiated Rate--Southwestern--contract 820131 to be
effective 4/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110331-5076.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1935-000.
    Applicants: Bison Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Bison Pipeline LLC submits tariff filing per 154.601:
Amendments to Negotiated Rate Agreements to be effective 4/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110331-5096.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1936-000.
    Applicants: Millennium Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Millennium Pipeline Company, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: RAM 2011 to be effective 5/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110331-5124.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1937-000.
    Applicants: East Tennessee Natural Gas, LLC.
    Description: East Tennessee Natural Gas, LLC's 2009-2010 Cashout
Report.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110331-5127.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1938-000.
    Applicants: Egan Hub Storage, LLC.
    Description: Egan Hub Storage, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Egan Hub Contract 310448 to be effective 4/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110331-5128.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1939-000.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.403(d)(2): Tracking Filing to be effective 5/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110331-5129.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 31, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-9306 Filed 4-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56844-56845]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23441]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-65297; File No. SR-ISE-2011-54]

 Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities
Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Fees and Rebates for Adding and Removing
Liquidity

September 8, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on August 30, 2011, the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(the ``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by
the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The ISE is proposing to amend its transaction fees and rebates for
adding and removing liquidity. The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.ise.com), at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange currently assesses a per contract transaction charge
to market participants that add or remove liquidity from the Exchange
(``maker/taker fees'') in 100 options classes (the ``Select
Symbols'').\3\ The purpose of this proposed rule change is to amend the
list of Select Symbols on the Exchange's Schedule of Fees, titled
``Rebates and Fees for Adding and Removing Liquidity in Select
Symbols.'' Specifically, the Exchange proposes to add Apple Inc.
(``AAPL''), Baidu, Inc. (``BIDU''), and iPath S&P 500 VIX Short-Term
Futures ETN (``VXX'') to the list of Select Symbols.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Options classes subject to maker/taker fees are identified
by their ticker symbol on the Exchange's Schedule of Fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While changes to the Fee Schedule pursuant to this proposal are
effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated these changes to be
operative on September 1, 2011.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Fee Schedule
is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \4\ in general, and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \5\ in particular, in that
it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees and other charges
among Exchange members and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to add AAPL, BIDU, and
VXX to its list of Select Symbols to attract additional order flow to
the Exchange. The Exchange anticipates that the addition of AAPL, BIDU,
and VXX to the list of Select Symbols will attract market participants
to transact equity options at the Exchange because of the available
rebates.
    The Exchange believes that it is equitable to amend the list of
Select Symbols by adding AAPL, BIDU, and VXX because the list of Select
Symbols would apply uniformly to all categories of participants in the
same manner. All market participants who trade the Select Symbols would
be subject to the applicable maker/taker fees and rebates.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\6\ At any time within 60 days of the filing
of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily
suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine

whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2011-54 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2011-54. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2011-54 and should be
submitted on or before October 5, 2011.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-23441 Filed 9-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26572-26573]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10311]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2015-0757]

Collection of Information Under Review by Office of Management
and Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625-0041

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Thirty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 the
U.S. Coast Guard is forwarding an Information Collection Request (ICR),
abstracted below, to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting approval for
reinstatement, with change, of the following collection of information:
1625-0041, Various International Agreement Pollution Prevention
Certificates and Documents, and Equivalency Certificates. Our ICR
describes the information we seek to collect from the public. Review
and comments by OIRA ensure we only impose paperwork burdens
commensurate with our performance of duties.

DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard and OIRA on or before June
2, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number [USCG-2015-0757] to the Coast Guard using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. Alternatively, you
may submit comments to OIRA using one of the following means:
    (1) Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Mail: OIRA, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503,
attention Desk Officer for the Coast Guard.

    (3) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. To ensure your comments are received in a
timely manner, mark the fax, attention Desk Officer for the Coast
Guard.
    A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available from:
COMMANDANT (CG-612), ATTN: PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT MANAGER, U.S. COAST
GUARD, 2703 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. AVE. SE., STOP 7710, WASHINGTON, DC
20593-7710.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Mr. Anthony Smith, Office of
Information Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for questions on these documents.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    This Notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended. An ICR is an application to
OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a Coast Guard
collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains information
describing the Collection's purpose, the Collection's likely burden on
the affected public, an explanation of the necessity of the Collection,
and other important information describing the Collection. There is one
ICR for each Collection.
    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be
granted based on the Collection being necessary for the proper
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the
Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the Collection;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information
subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
Collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. These comments
will help OIRA determine whether to approve the ICR referred to in this
Notice.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments
and related materials. Comments to Coast Guard or OIRA must contain the
OMB Control Number of the ICR. They must also contain the docket number
of this request, [USCG-2015-0757], and must be received by June 2,
2016.

Submitting Comments

    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions. Documents mentioned in this notice, and all public
comments, are in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and
can be viewed by following that Web site's instructions. Additionally,
if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will
be notified when comments are posted.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005 issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
    OIRA posts its decisions on ICRs online at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain after the comment period for each ICR. An OMB Notice
of Action on each ICR will become available via a hyperlink in the OMB
Control Number: 1625-0041.

Previous Request for Comments

    This request provides a 30-day comment period required by OIRA. The
Coast Guard published the 60-day notice (80 FR 72446, November 19,
2015) required by 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2). That Notice elicited no
comments. Accordingly, no changes have been made to the Collections.

Information Collection Request

    Title: Various International Agreement Pollution Prevention
Certificates and Documents, and Equivalency Certificates.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0041.
    Summary: Required by the adoption of the International Convention
for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL 73/78) and other
international treaties, these certificates and documents are evidence
of compliance for U.S. vessels on international voyages. Without the
proper certificates or documents, a U.S. vessel could be detained in a
foreign port.
    Need: Compliance with treaty requirements aids in the prevention of
pollution from ships.
    Forms: CG-5352, International Oil Pollution Prevention
Certificates; CG-5352A, Supplement to the International Oil Pollution
Prevention Certificate (IOPP Certificate); CG-5352B, Supplement to the
International Oil pollution Prevention Certificate (IOPP Certificate);
CG-6047, International Sewage Pollution Prevention Equivalency
Certificate; CG-6047A, Statement of Voluntary Compliance for Sewage
Pollution Prevention; CG-6056, International Air Pollution Prevention
Certificate; CG-6056A, Supplement to International Air Pollution
Prevention Certificate (IAPP Certificate); CG-6056B, Statement of
Voluntary Compliance for ANNEX VI of MARPOL 73/78; CG-6056C, Supplement
to Statement of Voluntary Compliance for ANNEX VI of MARPOL 73/78, CG-
6057, Statement of Voluntary Compliance, CG-6059, International Anti-
Fouling Systems Certificate; CG-6059A, Record of Anti-Fouling Systems;
CG-6060, International Energy Efficiency (IEE Certificate); and CG-
6060A, Supplement to the International Energy Efficiency Certificate
(IEE Certificate).
    Respondents: Owners, operators, or masters of vessels.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Hour Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has increased from 2,738
hours to 73,900 hours a year due to an increase in the estimated annual
number of responses of the initial one year burden for the Ship-to-Ship
Operations Plan.

    Authority:  The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended.

    Dated: April 26, 2016.
Thomas P. Michelli,
U.S. Coast Guard, Deputy Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-10311 Filed 5-2-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9833-9834]
[FR Doc No: 2020-03321]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-88198; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2019-96]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule
Change To Adopt NYSE Arca Rule 8.602-E To Permit the Listing and
Trading of Actively Managed Solution Shares and To List and Trade Two
Series of Actively Managed Solution Shares Issued by the American
Century ETF Trust Under Proposed NYSE Arca Rule 8.602-E

February 13, 2020.
    On December 23, 2019, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to (1) adopt proposed NYSE Arca Rule 8.602-E to
permit the Exchange to list and trade Actively Managed Solution Shares,
which are shares of actively managed exchange-traded funds for which
the portfolio is disclosed in accordance with standard mutual fund
disclosure rules; and (2) list and trade the following Actively Managed
Solution Shares under proposed NYSE Arca Rule 8.602-E: American Century
Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF and American Century Sustainable Equity ETF.
The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal
Register on January 3,

2020.\3\ The Commission has received no comment letters on the proposed
rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87867 (December 30,
2019), 85 FR 394.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding, or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change
is February 17, 2020. The Commission is extending this 45-day time
period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that it has
sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change. Accordingly, the
Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\5\ designates
April 2, 2020 as the date by which the Commission shall either approve
or disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR-NYSEArca-2019-96).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-03321 Filed 2-19-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 42588]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17051]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Maritime Administration

[Docket No. USCG-2013-0363]

Deepwater Port License Application: Liberty Natural Gas LLC, Port
Ambrose Deepwater Port

AGENCY: Maritime Administration, Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of intent; notice of public meeting; request for
comments; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Maritime Administration (MarAd) published a Notice of
Intent, Notice of Public Meeting, and Request for Comments regarding
the Port Ambrose Deepwater Port License Application in the June 24,
2013, Federal Register. Shortly thereafter, on July 9, 2013, a
correction was published in the Federal Register. In that correction,
MarAd extended the closing date for receipt of materials in response to
the request for comments to July 23, 2013. This notice corrects that
publication and extends the closing date for receipt of materials in
response to the request for comments to August 22, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Roddy Bachman, U.S. Coast Guard,
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Ms. Tracey
Ford, Maritime Administration, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For questions regarding viewing the Docket, call
Ms. Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of June 24, 2013, in FR Doc. 2013-0363, on
page 37878, in the second column, under the section captioned DATES in
the last sentence of the second paragraph replace ``July 14, 2013''
with ``August 22, 2013'' so that the sentence reads: ``Additionally,
materials submitted in response to the request for comments on the
license application must reach the Docket Management Facility as
detailed below, by August 22, 2013.''

    Dated: July 10, 2013.
    By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
T. Mitchell Hudson, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-17051 Filed 7-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 51 (Tuesday, March 17, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13797-13799]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05897]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2015-0165; Directorate Identifier 2015-NE-02-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company Turbofan
Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
General Electric Company (GE) GEnx turbofan engine models. This
proposed AD was prompted by reports of GEnx-1B and GEnx-2B engines
experiencing power loss in ice crystal icing (ICI) conditions. This
proposed AD would preclude the use of full authority digital engine
control (FADEC) software, version B175 or earlier, in GEnx-1B engines,
and the use of FADEC software, version C065 or earlier, in GEnx-2B
engines. We are proposing this AD to prevent engine failure, loss of
thrust control, and damage to the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 18, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
General Electric Company, GE Aviation, Room 285, 1 Neumann Way,
Cincinnati, OH 45215; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>You
may view this service information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 781-
238-7125.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
0165; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tomasz Rakowski, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this NPRM. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-0165;
Directorate Identifier 2015-NE-02-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
NPRM because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this NPRM.

Discussion

    We propose to adopt a new AD for all GE GEnx turbofan engine
models. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of GEnx-1B and GEnx-2B
engines experiencing power loss in ICI conditions. Five engines
experienced non-serviceable mechanical damage. One engine did not
recover power due to mechanical damage. This condition, if not
corrected, could result in engine failure, loss of thrust control, and
damage to the airplane. This proposed AD would preclude the use of
FADEC software, version B175 or earlier in GEnx-1B engines, and the use
of FADEC software, version C065 or earlier, in GEnx-2B engines. We are
proposing this AD to prevent engine failure, loss of thrust control,
and damage to the airplane.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed GE GEnx-1B Service Bulletin (SB) No. 73-0036, dated
January 6, 2015, and GE GEnx-2B SB No. 73-0035, dated September 16,
2014. The SBs describe procedures for installing FADEC software on GE
GEnx-1B and GEnx-2B engine models. This service information is
reasonably available; see ADDRESSES for ways to access this service
information.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this NPRM because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This NPRM would preclude the use of FADEC software, version B175 or
earlier, in GEnx-1B engines, and the use of FADEC software, version
C065 or earlier, in GEnx-2B engines.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 80 engines installed
on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take about
1 hour per engine to comply with this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per hour. No parts are required. Based on these figures, we
estimate the total cost of the proposed AD to U.S. operators to be
$6,800.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA-2015-0165; Directorate
Identifier 2015-NE-02-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by May 18, 2015.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all General Electric Company (GE) GEnx-1B
model turbofan engines with full authority digital engine control
(FADEC) software version B175 or earlier, installed, and GEnx-2B
model turbofan engines with FADEC software version C065 or earlier,
installed.

(d) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of GEnx-1B and GEnx-2B engines
experiencing power loss in ice crystal icing (ICI) conditions. We
are issuing this AD to prevent engine failure, loss of thrust
control, and damage to the airplane.

(e) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
    (1) Thirty days after the effective date of this AD, do not
operate any GE GEnx-1B engine with FADEC software version B175 or
earlier, installed in the electronic engine control (EEC).
    (2) Thirty days after the effective date of this AD, do not
operate any GE GEnx-2B engine with FADEC software version C065 or
earlier, installed in the EEC.

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, may approve AMOCs
to this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request. You may email your request to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

(g) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Tomasz Rakowski,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) GE GEnx-1B Service Bulletin (SB) No. 73-0036, dated January
6, 2015, and GE GEnx-2B SB No. 73-0035, dated September 16, 2014,
which are not incorporated by reference in this proposed AD, can be
obtained from GE using the contact information in paragraph (g)(3)
of this proposed AD.
    (3) For service information identified in this proposed AD,
contact General Electric Company, GE Aviation, Room 285, 1 Neumann
Way, Cincinnati, OH 45215; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on March 6, 2015.
Ann C. Mollica,
Acting Directorate Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-05897 Filed 3-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT:	EPA/RAA Meeting

FROM:	Richard Naylor

Drinking Water Protection Branch

TO:	Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2005–0025

At the request of Mr. Liam Connolly, Regional Airline Association (RAA),
a meeting was arranged by Rick Naylor, Drinking Water Protection Branch,
Office of Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water (OGWDW),
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).  It was held on December 4, 2008
at EPA headquarters.  Meeting attendees included Rick Naylor and Allison
Watanabe from EPA, Dean Davidson, Food and Drug Administration and Liam
Connolly, RAA.  Prior to the meeting and again at the beginning of the
meeting, Rick Naylor informed Mr. Connolly that EPA could not discuss
the Final ADWR because the public comment period had closed and the
Agency’s version of the rule was not final.

The purpose of the meeting was for Mr. Connolly to introduce himself to
EPA staff since he will now be the RAA’s environmental liaison and now
will be working with EPA in place of David Lotterer.  Mr. Connolly used
the time primarily to explain the operational aspects of the regional
airline industry.  He distributed copies of the Regional Airline
Association 2008 Annual Report.  Mr. Connolly offered his assistance and
that of the RAA environmental committee if EPA has any questions about
the operation of regional jets.