<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<META name="generator" content="Document">
<META name="creation-date" content="15/05/2008 10:45:53 ">
<TITLE>Document</TITLE>

28119
Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 95 /Thursday, May 15, 2008 /Notices
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications also will be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Additional information on all bank
holding companies may be obtained
from the National Information Center
website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than June 9, 2008.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
(Burl Thornton, Assistant Vice
President) 230 South LaSalle Street,
Chicago, Illinois 60690ñ1414:
1. Premier Bancorp of Illinois, Inc.,
Farmer City, Illinois, to retain 20.8
percent of the voting shares of F M
Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly
retain voting shares of Farmersñ
Merchants National Bank of Paxton,
both of Paxton, Illinois.
B. Federal Reserve Bank of San
Francisco (Kenneth Binning, Director,
Regional and Community Bank Group)
101 Market Street, San Francisco,
California 94105ñ1579:
1. Bank of Whitman Employee Stock
Ownership Plan, Colfax Washington, to
acquire 56 percent of the voting shares
of Whitman Bancorporation
Incorporated, Colfax, Washington, and
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares
of Bank of Whitman, Colfax,
Washington.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, May 12, 2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc.E8ñ10859 Filed 5ñ14ñ08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
Notice of Meeting
In accordance with section 10(d) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C., Appendix 2), announcement is
made of a Health Care Policy and
Research Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)
meeting.
A Special Emphasis Panel is a group
of experts in fields related to health care
research who are invited by the Agency
for Healthcare Research and Quality
(AHRQ), and agree to be available, to
conduct on an as needed basis,
scientific reviews of applications for
AHRQ support. Individual members of
the Panel do not attend regularly-
scheduled meetings and do not serve for
fixed terms or a long period of time.
Rather, they are asked to participate in
particular review meetings which
require their type of expertise.
Substantial segments of the upcoming
SEP meeting listed below will be closed
to the public in accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act,
section 10(d) of 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2
and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6). Grant
applications for the Announcement of
Availability of Funds for Grants
regarding Ambulatory Safety and
Quality Program: Improving
Management of Individuals with
Complex Healthcare Needs through
Health IT (R18) applications are to be
reviewed and discussed at this meeting.
These discussions are likely to reveal
personal information concerning
individuals associated with the
applications. This information is
exempt from mandatory disclosure
under the above-cited statutes.
SEP Meeting on: Ambulatory Safety and
Quality Program: Improving Management of
Individuals with Complex Healthcare Needs
through Health IT (R18).
Date: June 18–20, 2008 (Open on June 18
from 5 p.m. to 5:15 p.m. and closed for the
remainder of the meeting).
Place: Crowne Plaza, Conference Room
TBD, 3 Research Blvd, Rockville, Maryland
20850.
Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain
a roster of members, agenda or minutes of the
nonconfidential portions of this meeting
should contact Mrs. Bonnie Campbell,
Committee Management Officer, Office of
Extramural Research, Education and Priority
Populations, AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Room
2038, Rockville, Maryland 20850, Telephone
(301) 427ñ1554.
Agenda items for this meeting are subject
to change as priorities dictate.
Dated: May 5, 2008.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. E8ñ10565 Filed 5ñ14ñ08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–90–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2007–E–0035 (formerly
Docket No. 2007E–0133) and [Docket No.
FDA–2007–E–0227 (formerly Docket No.
2007E–0148)]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; TYZEKA
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
TYZEKA and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by
law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submissions of
applications to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of patents
which claim that human drug product.
ADDRESSES:
Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFAñ305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to http://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg 51,
rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993ñ
0002, 301ñ796ñ3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98ñ
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100ñ670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
productís regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:18 May 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1

28120
Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 95 /Thursday, May 15, 2008 /Notices
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the human drug
product becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The
approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market
the human drug product and continues
until FDA grants permission to market
the drug product. Although only a
portion of a regulatory review period
may count toward the actual amount of
extension that the Director of Patents
and Trademarks may award (for
example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDAís determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a human drug product will include all
of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA approved for marketing the
human drug product TYZEKA. TYZEKA
is indicated for the treatment of chronic
hepatitis B in adult patients with
evidence of viral replication and either
evidence of persistent elevations in
serum aminotransferases or
histologically active disease.
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent
and Trademark Office received patent
term restoration applications for
TYZEKA (U.S. Patent Nos. 6,395,716
and 6,569,837) from Idenix
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Centre National
de La Recherche Scientifique, and
LíUniversite Montpellier II, and the
Patent and Trademark Office requested
FDAís assistance in determining the
patentsí eligibility for patent term
restoration. In a letter dated May 16,
2007, FDA advised the Patent and
Trademark Office that this human drug
product had undergone a regulatory
review period and that the approval of
TYZEKA represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the
product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent
and Trademark Office requested that
FDA determine the productís regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
TYZEKA is 2,309 days. Of this time,
2,009 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 300 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355(i)) became effective: July 1, 2000.
The applicant claims the investigational
new drug application (IND) was under
clinical hold until August 15, 2000, and
claims that date as the date the IND
became effective. However, according to
FDA records, the IND was considered
safe to proceed with some
recommendations that were sent to the
sponsor to consider prior to
commencement of the study. The IND
effective date was July 1, 2000, which
was 30 days after FDA receipt of the
IND.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the act: December 30, 2005.
FDA has verified the applicantís claim
that the new drug application (NDA) for
TYZEKA (NDA 22ñ011) was initially
submitted on December 30, 2005.
3. The date the application was
approved: October 25, 2006. FDA has
verified the applicantís claim that NDA
22
–011 was approved on October 25,
2006.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 442 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see
ADDRESSES
) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by July 14, 2008.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
November 12, 2008. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41ñ42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008,
the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to
the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a
Government-wide, electronic docket
management system. Electronic
comments or submissions will be
accepted by FDA through FDMS only.
Dated: April 28, 2008.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E8ñ10857 Filed 5ñ14ñ08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Center for Scientific Review; Amended
Notice of Meeting
Notice is hereby given of a change in
the meeting of the Biophysics of Neural
Systems Study Section, June 12, 2008, 8
a.m. to June 12, 2008, 8 p.m., Hotel
Lombardy, 2019 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20006 which was
published in the Federal Register on
April 29, 2008, 73 FR 23257ñ23259.
The meeting will be held June 12,
2008, 8 a.m. to June 13, 2008, 4 p.m.
The meeting location remains the same.
The meeting is closed to the public.
Dated: May 7, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8ñ10671 Filed 5ñ14ñ08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Center for Scientific Review;
Cancellation of Meeting
Notice is hereby given of the
cancellation of the Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel, June
10, 2008, 6 a.m. to June 11, 2008, 6 p.m.,
National Institutes of Health, 6701
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892
which was published in the Federal
Register on April 29, 2008, 73 FR
23257
–23259.
The meeting is cancelled due to the
applications being withdrawn.
Dated: May 7, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8ñ10672 Filed 5ñ14ñ08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–M
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:18 May 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 19 (Monday, February 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7753-7754]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02006]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90993; File No. SR-CboeBYX-2020-021]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on Proceedings To
Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change, as
Modified by Amendment No. 2, To Introduce Periodic Auctions for the
Trading of U.S. Equity Securities

January 26, 2021.
    On July 17, 2020, Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``BYX'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule
change to introduce periodic auctions in U.S. equity securities. The
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register
on August 4, 2020.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89424 (July 29,
2020), 85 FR 47262.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On September 10, 2020, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange
Act,\4\ the Commission designated a longer period within which to
approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change,
or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the
proposed rule change.\5\ On October 27, 2020, the Exchange filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change, and on October 28, 2020
the Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change, which
replaced in its entirety the proposed rule change as modified by
Amendment No. 1.\6\ On October 30, 2020, the Commission noticed the
filing of Amendment No. 2 and instituted proceedings under Section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act \7\ to determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change.\8\ The Commission has received
comment letters on the proposed rule change.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89820, 85 FR 57891
(September 16, 2020). The Commission designated November 2, 2020 as
the date by which the Commission shall approve or disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the
proposed rule change.
    \6\ Comments on the proposal, including Amendments No. 1 and No.
2, can be found on the Commission's website at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboebyx-2020-021/srcboebyx2020021.htm.
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90288, 85 FR 70678
(November 5, 2020).
    \9\ Comments on the proposed rule change can be found on the
Commission's website at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboebyx-2020-021/srcboebyx2020021.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act \10\ provides that, after
initiating disapproval proceedings, the Commission shall issue an order
approving or disapproving the proposed rule change not later than 180
days after the date of publication of notice of filing of the proposed
rule change. The Commission may extend the period for issuing an order
approving or disapproving the proposed rule change by not more than 60
days if the Commission determines that a longer period is appropriate
and publishes reasons for such determination. The proposed rule change
was published for notice and comment in the Federal Register on August
4, 2020. January 31,

2021 is 180 days from that date, and April 1, 2021 is 240 days from
that date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the proposed
rule change. Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)
of the Exchange Act,\11\ designates April 1, 2021 as the date by which
the Commission shall either approve or disapprove the proposed rule
change (File No. SR-CboeBYX-2020-021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-02006 Filed 1-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 35308]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15913]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Disclosure of
Seat Dimensions To Facilitate the Use of Child Safety Seats on
Airplanes During Passenger-Carrying Operations

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The collection involves each passenger carrying air carrier
operating under the Code of Federal Regulations to post on the internet
website of the air carrier the maximum dimensions of a child safety
seat that can be used on those aircraft. The information to be
collected will be used to facilitate the use of child restraint systems
onboard airplanes and is required by section 412 of the FAA
Modernization and Reform Act of 2012.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by September 24, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Barbara
Hall, Federal Aviation Administration, ASP-110, 10101 Hillwood Parkway,
Fort Worth, TX 76177.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Hall by email at:
[email protected]; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0760.
    Title: Disclosure of Seat Dimensions to Facilitate the Use of Child
Safety Seats on Airplanes During Passenger-Carrying Operations.
    Form Numbers: There are no forms associated with this collection.
    Type of Review: Renewal.
    Background: Section 412 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of
2012 (Pub. L. 112-95) specifically required the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) to conduct rulemaking ``[T]o require each air
carrier operating under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations to post on the internet website of the air carrier the
maximum dimensions of a child safety seat that can be used on each
aircraft operated by the air carrier to enable passengers to determine
which child safety seats can be used on those aircraft.'' As a result,
the FAA amended 14 CFR 121.311, which requires passenger carrying air
carriers to make available on their websites the width of the widest
passenger seat in each class of service for each make, model and series
of airplane used in passenger-carrying operations (80 FR 58575).
Section 412 of Public Law 112-95 requires that all air carriers provide
this required information on their internet websites. The vast majority
of this burden occurred on a one-time basis as air carriers initially
provided information on their websites in order to comply with the
regulation. After initial implementation, the only time air carriers
need to update their websites after initial implementation is when a
new airplane make, model, or series is introduced to an air carrier's
fleet, or when an air carrier replaces the widest or narrowest seats
installed on an existing airplane make, model, or series with wider or
narrower seats. The purpose of this collection is to facilitate the use
of child restraint systems onboard airplanes by providing greater
information to caregivers to help them determine whether a particular
child restraint system will fit in an airplane seat.
    Respondents: 50 part 121 air carriers.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 7 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 350 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 19, 2018.
Karen Shutt,
Manager, Performance, Policy, and Records Management Branch, ASP-110.
[FR Doc. 2018-15913 Filed 7-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


                     Responses to Data Call: ICR Letters

Estimated Substantiation requests

                              Estimated Responses
Region 1
                                       0
                                       0
Region 2
                                      12
                                       5
Region 3
                                       3
                                       3
Region 4
                                       0
                                       0
Region 5
                                       4
                                       4
Region 6
                                       7
                                       0
Region 7
                                       0
                                       0
Region 8
                                       7
                                       5
Region 9
                                       1
                                       2
Region 10
                                       4
                                       4
OARM
                                       3
                                       3
AO
                                       0
                                       0
OAR
                                       0
                                       0
OCFO
                                       0
                                       0
OCSPP/OPPT
                                      202
                                      202
OITA
                                       0
                                       0
OECA
                                       1
                                       0
OEI
                                       0
                                       0
OGC
                                       5
                                       0
OIG
                                       0
                                       0
ORD
                                       0
                                       0
OSWER
                                       0
                                       0
OW
                                       0
                                       0

                                       0
                                       0

                                       0
                                       0
Totals
                                      249
                                      228
The time period reported - July 1, 2012  -  June 30, 2013


May 31, 2016
Memorandum to the Docket
From: Jim O'Leary
Subject: Email sent to Jeff Miller, Treated Wood Council
On May 9, 2016, I corresponded via email with Jeff Miller of the Treated Wood Council seeking information on the estimated number of treated wood preserving generators to support the economic analysis for the Agency's Hazardous Waste Generator Improvements final rule.


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 4529]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01602]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Request To Release Airport Property

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on request to release airport property
at the Colonel James Jabara Airport (AAO), Wichita, Kansas.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the
release of land at the Colonel James Jabara Airport (AAO), Wichita,
Kansas, under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(2).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 27, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to
the FAA at the following address: Lynn D. Martin, Airports Compliance
Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, Airports Division, ACE-
610C, 901 Locust Room 364, Kansas City, MO 64106.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be
mailed or delivered to: John Oswald, Airport Engineer, Colonel James
Jabara Airport, Wichita Airport Authority; 2173 Air Cargo Rd., Wichita,
KS 67209,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynn D. Martin, Airports Compliance
Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, Airports Division, ACE-
610C, 901 Locust Room 364, Kansas City, MO 64106,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    The request to release property may be reviewed, by appointment, in
person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the
request to release approximately 5.22 acres of airport
property at the Colonel James Jabara Airport (AAO) under the provisions
of 49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(2). On September 15, 2013, the City of Wichita's
Airport Engineer requested from the FAA that approximately 5.22 acres of property be released for sale to Sedgwick County Public
Works for the purpose of road widening and utilities. On December 22,
2013, the FAA determined that the request to release property at
Colonel James Jabara Airport (AAO) submitted by the Sponsor meets the
procedural requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration and the
release of the property does not and will not impact future aviation
needs at the airport. The FAA may approve the request, in whole or in
part, no sooner than thirty days after the publication of this Notice.
    The following is a brief overview of the request:
    Colonel James Jabara Airport (AAO) is proposing the release of a
parcel, totaling 5.22 acres. The release of land is
necessary to comply with Federal Aviation Administration Grant
Assurances that do not allow federally acquired airport property to be
used for non-aviation purposes. The sale of the subject property will
result in the land at the Colonel James Jabara Airport (AAO) being
changed from aeronautical to nonaeronautical use and release the
surface lands from the conditions of the AIP Grant Agreement Grant
Assurances, but retaining the mineral rights. In accordance with 49
U.S.C. 47107(c)(2)(B)(i) and (iii), the airport will receive fair
market value for the property.
    Any person may inspect, by appointment, the request in person at
the FAA office listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. In
addition, any person may, upon appointment and request, inspect the
application, notice and other documents determined by the FAA to be
related to the application in person at the Colonel James Jabara
Airport.

    Re-Issued in Kansas City, MO, on January 16, 2014.
Jim A. Johnson,
Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-01602 Filed 1-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 105 (Friday, May 31, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25252-25253]
[FR Doc No: 2019-11359]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 8015-006]

Notice of Application for Temporary Amendment and Soliciting
Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests: North Eastern Wisconsin
Hydro, LLC

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Amendment to increase the authorized target
elevation annually between May 15 and September 15. As explained in (k)
below, this notice only seeks comments, motions to intervene, and
protests on a temporary variance from the authorized target elevation,
for May 15 through November 15, 2019.
    b. Project No.: 8015-006.
    c. Date Filed: May 10, 2019, as supplemented on May 13, 2019.
    d. Applicant: North Eastern Wisconsin Hydro, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Shawano Paper Mills Dam Project.
    f. Location: The project is located on the Wolf River in Shawano
County, Wisconsin.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Ms. Melissa Rondou, Eagle Creek Renewable
Energy, 116 N. State St., P.O. Box 167, Neshkoro, WI 54960; telephone:
(920) 293-4628 ext. 347.
    i. FERC Contact: Christopher Chaney, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, and
email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and protests
is 15

days from the issuance date of this notice by the Commission.
    All documents may be filed electronically via the internet. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's
website at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail a copy to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Please include
the project number (P-8015-006) on any comments or motions filed.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person on the official service list for the
project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    k. Description of Request: The exemptee is seeking a permanent
amendment, or in the alternative a temporary amendment for 2019 while
the Commission reviews the permanent amendment request. This notice
only seeks comments, motions to intervene, and protests on a temporary
variance from the authorized target elevation, for the period from May
15 through November 15, 2019, which is consistent with the time period
for the previously granted temporary variances.
    The exemptee requests authorization to operate the project at a
target elevation of 802.9 feet mean sea level (msl) during the ``ice-
free period,'' while continuing to operate the project within the
authorized elevation range of 801.83 feet msl and 803.17 feet msl. The
exemptee defines the ``ice-free period'' as between May 15 and
September 15. The exemptee would continue to operate at the current
authorized target elevation of 802.5 feet msl and within the authorized
elevation range of 801.83 feet msl and 803.17 feet msl at all other
times of the year. The exemptee states the amendment is necessary to
address recreation and possible public safety concerns when operating
the project at the authorized target elevation.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE, Room 2A, Washington, DC
20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed on
the Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits
in the docket number field to access the document. A copy is also
available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item (h)
above. Agencies may obtain copies of the application directly from the
applicant.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: All filings must (1)
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or
``MOTION TO INTERVENE'' as applicable ; (2) set forth in the heading
the name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise
comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, motions to intervene, or protests must set forth their
evidentiary basis. A copy of all other filings in reference to this
application must be accompanied by proof of service on all persons
listed in the service list prepared by the Commission in this
proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.

    Dated: May 23, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-11359 Filed 5-30-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 173 (Friday, September 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54899-54901]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21630]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-D-0984]

Draft Guidance for Industry on Specification of the Unique
Facility Identifier System for Drug Establishment Registration;
Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ``Specification
of the Unique Facility Identifier (UFI) System for Drug Establishment
Registration.'' This draft guidance specifies the UFI system for
registration of domestic and foreign drug establishments. The guidance
addresses provisions set forth in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act), as amended by the Food and Drug Administration
Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA).

DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment on this
draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by November 5, 2013. Submit either electronic or written
comments concerning the proposed collection of information by November
5, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002; the
Office of Communication, Outreach and Development (HFM-40), Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 1401
Rockville Pike, suite 200N, Rockville, MD 20852-1448; or Communications
Staff (HFV-12), Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug
Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855. Send one self-
addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance document.
    Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets

Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Loebach, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 2262, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry
entitled ``Specification of the Unique Facility Identifier (UFI) System
for Drug Establishment Registration.'' In July 2012, FDASIA was signed
into law (Pub. L. 112-144). Sections 701 and 702 of FDASIA direct the
Secretary to specify the UFI system for registration of domestic and
foreign drug establishments. Once the UFI system is specified, section
510 of the FD&C Act, as amended, requires that each initial and annual
drug establishment registration include a UFI (21 U.S.C. 360(b), (c),
and (i)). This draft guidance reflects the Agency's current thinking in
light of data standards, information technology, and information
management resources. As these variables change over time, FDA may
revisit this guidance.
    This draft guidance is intended solely to address the provisions in
sections 701 and 702 of FDASIA. Although section 703 of FDASIA mandates
the use of the same UFI system (specified for drug establishment
registration) to identify excipient manufacturers in product listings,
this guidance does not address implementation of section 703 of FDASIA.
    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the Agency's current thinking on
specification of the UFI system for drug establishment registration. It
does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not
operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be used
if such approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3501-3520), Federal Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information that
they conduct or sponsor. ``Collection of information'' is defined in 44
U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or
requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records,
or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), requires Federal Agencies to provide a
60-day notice in the Federal Register for each proposed collection of
information before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, FDA is publishing this notice of the
proposed collection of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the collection of information associated with this
draft guidance, FDA invites comments on the following topics: (1)
Whether the proposed information collected is necessary for the proper
performance of FDA's functions, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimated burden of
the proposed information collected, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of information collected on the respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
    Sections 701 and 702 of FDASIA direct the Secretary to specify the
UFI system for registration of domestic and foreign drug
establishments. Once the UFI system is specified, section 510 of the
FD&C Act, as amended, requires that each initial and annual drug
establishment registration include a UFI. The draft guidance specifies
the UFI system as follows. At this time, FDA's preferred UFI for a drug
establishment is the Data Universal Numbering System D-U-N-S (DUNS)
number, assigned and managed by Dun and Bradstreet. The DUNS number is
available free of charge to all drug establishments and may be obtained
by visiting the Web site for Dun and Bradstreet. As explained in the
guidance, however, if a company wants to use an alternative UFI for its
drug establishment, it may contact FDA via email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    OMB has previously approved existing information collections
associated with the electronic submission of initial and annual
registration of domestic and foreign drug establishments, as described
in part 207 (21 CFR part 207) and the guidance document ``Providing
Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format--Drug Establishment
Registration and Drug Listing'' (the 2009 Guidance) (available at
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM072339.pdf), under
OMB control number 0910-0045. The Food and Drug Administration
Amendments Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-85) required that drug
establishment registration and drug listing information must be
submitted electronically unless a waiver is granted. As part of its
recommendations to facilitate electronic submission of drug
establishment registration information, as required by statute, the
2009 guidance explained that FDA is adopting the use of extensible
markup language (XML) files in a standard structured product labeling
(SPL) format for the electronic submission of drug establishment
registration and drug listing information. The 2009 guidance also
explained that the automated submission process functions most
efficiently and effectively when the information is provided in a
standardized format with defined code sets and codes. In addition, the
2009 guidance requested, among other things, the electronic submission
of a site-specific DUNS number for each entity as part of the
registration information submitted electronically. In FDA's experience,
all firms currently registered with FDA under section 510 of the FD&C
Act and part 207 have submitted their DUNS number as requested in the
2009 guidance.
    The draft guidance addressed in this notice, ``Specification of the
Unique Facility Identifier (UFI) System for Drug Establishment
Registration,'' when finalized, would modify the currently approved
information collections associated with drug establishment
registration, consistent with subsequent statutory enactment. In July
2012, Congress enacted FDASIA, sections 701 and 702 of which direct the
Secretary to specify the UFI system for registration of domestic and
foreign drug establishments. Once the UFI system is specified, section
510 of the FD&C Act, as amended, requires that each initial and annual
drug establishment registration include a UFI. Because drug firms
generally possess, and for those already registered, have previously
provided, a DUNS number for each facility, FDA expects that consistent
with the proposed UFI system, they will submit DUNS numbers as the UFIs
for drug establishments. Although the change in statutory authority
described in this document will alter the legal basis for submission of
the DUNS number, it is not expected to have any other impact on the
previously approved collection of information.

FDA expects that the DUNS number will continue to be submitted by the
same respondents, with the same frequency, as part of the same
electronic registration submission previously approved under the PRA,
and the Agency will continue to use the information for the same
purposes, in furtherance of its mission to protect the public health.
    While FDA anticipates that firms will submit DUNS as UFI, the draft
guidance also instructs firms who want to submit an alternative
identifier to contact FDA. FDA estimates that no more than one
respondent per year will invoke this option. FDA estimates that it
would require on average 1 hour for a company to contact FDA and
identify its proposed alternative UFI. If FDA determines that the
alternative is one the Agency's systems can accommodate, and that
satisfies the statutory goal of uniquely identifying the firm's
facilities, FDA anticipates that the firm would include that
alternative UFI in place of the DUNS, with no net change in the burden
of a registration submission. We invite comment on these estimates.

III. Comments

    Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to http://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.

IV. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/GuidanceforIndustry/default.htm, or http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: August 29, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
 Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-21630 Filed 9-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 99 (Wednesday, May 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30362-30363]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12166]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-69596; File No. SR-NSCC-2013-06]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing
Corporation; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Modify Fees Related to Portfolio Composition File
Reporting in Addendum A of Its Rules and Procedures

May 16, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 3, 2013, National Securities Clearing Corporation (``NSCC'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which
Items have been prepared primarily by NSCC. NSCC filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) \3\ of the Act and Rule
19b-4(f)(2) \4\ thereunder, so that the proposed rule change was
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the
Proposed Rule Change

    The proposed rule change is to modify the fee schedule related to
NSCC's Portfolio Composition File Reporting in Addendum A of NSCC's
Rules and Procedures (``Rules''), as described below.

II. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NSCC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. NSCC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A),
(B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Commission has modified the text of the summaries
prepared by NSCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is for NSCC to revise its
fee schedule (as listed in Addendum A of its Rules \6\) as it relates
to charges for reports on Index Receipt Portfolio Composition Files.
Portfolio Composition File reports, as currently offered, contain
information on all Index Receipt Portfolios eligible for processing by
NSCC (``Legacy Files''). NSCC releases two Legacy Files each business
day--one file for domestic portfolios and one for foreign portfolios.
The files are offered both as machine readable output (``MRO'') and
print image files. The fee associated with a Member's subscription to
the Legacy Files is $125 per file per month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ NSCC Rules, Addendum A, http://dtcc.com/legal/rules_proc/nscc_rules.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to this proposed rule change, NSCC implemented new fees
for the offering of an enhanced reporting interface that allows Members
to receive a Portfolio Composition File that contains only the Index
Receipt

Portfolios to which a Member subscribes (``Enhanced Files''). Fees for
the Enhanced Files are charged in relation to the number of portfolios
received by the Member on an average, daily basis per month. The
Enhanced Files are available as MRO files and as a web-based interface
from which Participants may download and print reports.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Enhanced Files also allow Members to view additional
information with respect to a portfolio, including breakdowns of
asset class and ``cash-in lieu'' components that are not otherwise
NSCC-eligible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NSCC continues to make available to Members subscriptions to Legacy
Files at the current fee rates.
Revision to Fee Schedule
    Pursuant to the fee schedule in Addendum A of NSCC's Rules, Members
are currently charged $125 per Legacy File.\8\ While the availability
of and fees for Legacy Files are remaining unchanged, NSCC is now
charging the following fees to Members who subscribe to the Enhanced
Files:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See NSCC Rules, Addendum A, supra note 6.
    \9\ ``Units'' refers to the number of portfolio subscriptions
for each billing month. Unit charges are calculated by applying a
tiered fee structure to the average daily number of units subscribed
to by the Member in the billing month.

         Subscription-Based Portfolio Composition File Reporting
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Fees                               Units \9\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
$5........................................  the first zero to 200
                                             average daily units per
                                             month.
$3........................................  the next 300 average daily
                                             units per month (201-500).
$2........................................  for all average daily units
                                             above 500 per month.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change relates only to the enhanced reporting of
Portfolio Composition Files and does not otherwise impact Index Receipt
processing functionality.
Implementation Timeframe
    The fee changes described above took effect on May 9, 2013.
Proposed Rule Changes
    NSCC is amending Addendum A of its Rules to include the fee
schedule for ``Subscription-based Portfolio Composition File
Reporting,'' as shown above. No other changes to the Rules are
contemplated by this proposed rule change.
2. Statutory Basis
    NSCC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act, as amended, specifically Section
17A(b)(3)(D),\10\ and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable
to NSCC because the change is aligning fees with the costs of
delivering the additional reports described above, thus providing for
the equitable allocation of reasonable fees among NSCC's Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    NSCC does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any
impact, or impose any burden, on competition.

(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not yet
been solicited or received. NSCC will notify the Commission of any
written comments received by NSCC.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The forgoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \12\ thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-NSCC-2013-06 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC,
20549-1090.

    All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NSCC-2013-06. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filings will also be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of NSCC and on
NSCC's Web site at http://dtcc.com/legal/rule_filings/nscc/2013.php.
    All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NSCC-2013-06 and
should be submitted on or before June 12, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-12166 Filed 5-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 216 (Thursday, November 9, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77242-77244]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24853]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2023-0803]
RIN 1625-AA11

Security Zone; Coast Guard Sector Key West, Trumbo Point Annex,
Key West Harbor, Key West, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a security zone for
certain waters of the Key West Harbor surrounding the Coast Guard
Sector Key West on Trumbo Point Annex. This action is necessary to
safeguard Coast Guard assets in the interest of national security. This
proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in
the security zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Key West
or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this
proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before December 11, 2023.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2023-0803 using the Federal Decision-Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments. This notice of proposed rulemaking
with its plain-language, 100-word-or-less proposed rule summary will be
available in this same docket.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Hailye Wilson, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    The Coast Guard Sector Key West, FL and its assets are on property
previously under the control of the Naval Air Station (NAS) Key West,
FL. The current regulations restricting vessel traffic in and around
NAS Key West are found in 33 CFR 334.610 and are only enforceable by
the Commanding Officer of NAS Key West, and certain designated
agencies. Currently, the Coast Guard requires the authority from the
Commanding Officer, NAS Key West, before they can enforce a security
zone in and around Coast Guard property and assets. This additional
step can generate unnecessary delays, which creates security concerns
for the Coast Guard and potential hazards to the public. The Captain of
the Port Key West (COTP) has determined that permanent security zone is
in the interest of national security, the safety of life, and the
prevention of damage to property.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the security of
vessels, waterfront facilities, and personnel located at the Coast
Guard, Sector Key West. The Coast Guard is proposing this rulemaking
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70051 and 70124.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP is proposing to establish a permanent security zone
surrounding the Coast Guard Sector Key West, located adjacent to Trumbo
Point Annex, Naval Air Station Key West. The security zone would cover
all navigable waters within 100 yards of the Coast Guard Sector Key
West. No vessel, other than Government-owned vessels and specifically
authorized private craft, or persons would be permitted to stop or land
in the security zone. The regulatory text we are proposing appears at
the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the fact that the
area covered by the permanent security zone created by this rulemaking
is already a regulated restricted area as contained in 33 CFR 334.610.
Unauthorized vessels and persons have not been allowed to stop and land
within 100 yards of the Coast Guard base on Trumbo Point Annex through
the regulation in Sec.  334.610. This rulemaking allows the Coast Guard
to enforce the restricted area through a security zone. Additionally,
the security zone only extends 100 yards from the Coast Guard Sector
Key West, located adjacent to Trumbo Point Annex, Naval Air Station Key
West and does not impede any regular vessel traffic (i.e., cruise
ships, ferries, small passenger vessels, etc.). Vessels will be able to
transit safely around the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    For the reasons stated in section IV.A above, this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or
operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rulemaking would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental

jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the potential effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a security
zone that would prohibit vessels and persons from stopping or landing
within 100 yards of the United Sates Coast Guard base on Trumbo Point
Annex. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision-Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To
do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2023-0803 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If you cannot submit your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate
instructions.
    Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. Also, if you click on the Dockets tab and then the
proposed rule, you should see a ``Subscribe'' option for email alerts.
The option will notify you when comments are posted, or a final rule is
published.
    We review all comments received, but we will only post comments
that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may choose not to post
off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we receive.
    Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal
information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions
to the docket in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.764 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.764  Security Zone; Coast Guard Sector Key West, Trumbo Point
Annex, Key West Harbor, Key West, FL.

    (a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All waters
within 100 yards of the Coast Guard Sector Key West, from surface to
bottom, encompassed by a line that extends north 100 yards into the
Fleming Key Channel from point 24[deg]34'02'' N, 81[deg]47'52.7'' W;
thence westerly, maintaining 100 yards from the Coast Guard property;
thence southerly, 100 yards from the end of the piers; thence

easterly to 24[deg]33'48.8'' N, 081[deg]47'54.8'' W, and along the
shore line back to the beginning point. These coordinates are based on
North American Datum 1983.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, vessel means every
description of watercraft or other artificial contrivance used, or
capable of being used, as a means of transportation on water, except
U.S. Coast Guard or U.S. naval vessels.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general security zone regulations in
subpart D of this part, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the
security zone described in paragraph (a) of this section without the
permission of the Captain of the Port, other than Government-owned
vessels.
    (2) While anchoring, loitering, or fishing activities are
prohibited, vessels may transit the following portions of the security
zone at safe speed:
    (i) Fleming Key Cut, extending from the northwest corner of Pier D-
3 of U.S. Coast Guard Key West, eastward beneath the Fleming Key
bridge.
    (ii) Key West Bight Channel, which extends easterly from the Main
Ship Channel into Key West Bight, the northerly edge of which channel
passes 25 feet south of the U.S. Coast Guard Sector Key West piers on
the north side of the Bight.

Jason D. Ingram,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Key West.
[FR Doc. 2023-24853 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: May 6, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 86)]
[Notices]
[Page 20968]
[DOCID:fr06my09-86]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2009-0001]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice; 30-day notice and request for comments; revision of a
currently approved information collection; OMB No. 1660-0006; FEMA Form
086-0-1, Flood Insurance Application, and FEMA Form 086-0-2, Flood
Insurance Cancellation/Nullification Request Form, and FEMA Form 086-0-
3, Flood Insurance General Change Endorsement, and FEMA Form 086-0-5,
Flood Insurance Preferred Risk Policy Application, and FEMA Form 086-0-
4, V-Zone Risk Factor Rating Form and Instructions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has submitted
the information collection abstracted below to the Office of Management
and Budget for review and clearance in accordance with the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The submission describes the
nature of the information collection, the categories of respondents,
the estimated burden (i.e., the time, effort and resources used by
respondents to respond) and cost, and includes the actual data
collection instruments FEMA will use.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 5, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the proposed information
collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget. Comments should be addressed to the Desk
Officer for the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection should be made to Director,
Records Management Division, 1800 South Bell Street, Arlington, VA
20598-3005, facsimile number<PHONE_NUMBER>, or e-mail address FEMA-
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Collection of Information

    Title: National Flood Insurance Program Policy Forms.
    Type of information collection: Revision of a currently approved
information collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-0006.
    Form Titles and Numbers: FEMA Form 086-0-1, Flood Insurance
Application, and FEMA Form 086-0-2, Flood Insurance Cancellation/
Nullification Request Form, and FEMA Form 086-0-3, Flood Insurance
General Change Endorsement, and FEMA Form 086-0-5, Flood Insurance
Preferred Risk Policy Application, and FEMA Form 086-0-4, V-Zone Risk
Factor Rating Form and Instructions.
    Abstract: In order to provide for the availability of policies for
flood insurance, policies are marketed through the facilities of
licensed insurance agents or brokers in the various States.
Applications from agents or brokers are forwarded to a servicing
company designated as fiscal agent by FIA. Upon receipt and examination
of the application and required premium, the servicing company issues
the appropriate Federal flood insurance policy.
    Affected Public: Individual and Households, Business or other for-
profit, Farms, State, Local or Tribal Government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 123,361.
    Frequency of Response: Once Annually.
    Estimated Average Hour Burden per Respondent: .0769 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 9,480.58.
    Estimated Cost: There are no start-up, operational or other costs
associated with this information collection.

Larry Gray,
Director, Records Management Division, Office of Management, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. E9-10478 Filed 5-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-52-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25642-25644]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10483]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0422; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-177-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8 airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by reports that various pushrods had been manufactured with
tubes having the incorrect heat treatment. This proposed AD would
require replacing the affected pushrod assembly. We are proposing this
AD to prevent loss of rudder control, reduced directional control of
the airplane on the ground, or a jammed nose landing gear (NLG) door
that could prevent the NLG from retracting or extending.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 15, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt Boulevard,
Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 416-375-
4539; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0422;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-177-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian AD CF-2011-31, dated August
15, 2011 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    It was discovered that various pushrods installed on the DHC-8
Series 100/200/300/400 aeroplanes had been manufactured with tubes
having the incorrect heat treatment, using 6061-T4 instead of 6061-
T6. The incorrect heat treatment appreciably degrades the strength
of these affected pushrods. Failure of these affected pushrods could
result in a loss of rudder control, reduced directional control of
the aeroplane on the ground or a jammed nose landing gear (NLG) door
that could prevent the NLG from retracting or extending.
    This [TCCA] directive mandates the replacement of the affected
pushrod assembly.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Bombardier has issued the following service bulletins. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
     Service Bulletin 8-27-99, dated October 10, 2008;
     Service Bulletin 8-27-100, Revision A, dated March 22,
2011;
     Service Bulletin 8-32-156, dated February 26, 2010;
     Service Bulletin 84-27-21, Revision A, dated March 22,
2011;
     Service Bulletin 84-32-28, dated November 27, 2008; and
     Service Bulletin 84-32-75, dated June 1, 2010.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    For certain actions on the same part, the MCAI specified both 3,000
and 6,000 flight-hour compliance times. To reconcile that difference,
this proposed AD has a compliance time of 3,000 flight hours after the
effective date of the AD, for the action in paragraph (k) of this
proposed AD. We have determined this compliance time is necessary to
address the identified unsafe condition in a timely manner. This
difference has been coordinated with TCCA.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 171 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 28 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $6,504 per product. Where
the service information lists required parts costs that are

covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge
for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based
on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $1,519,164, or $8,884 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2012-0422; Directorate Identifier
2011-NM-177-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by June 15, 2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the Bombardier, Inc. airplanes, certificated
in any category, as identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of
this AD.
    (1) Model DHC-8-102,-103,-106,-201, -202,-301,-311, and -315
airplanes, serial numbers 413, 443, 450 through 452 inclusive, 456,
458, 462 through 465 inclusive, 467 through 470 inclusive, and 473
through 588 inclusive.
    (2) Model DHC-8-400,-401, and -402 airplanes, serial numbers
4001, 4003 through 4006 inclusive, and 4008 through 4197 inclusive.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight
controls; and Code 32: Landing gear.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports that various pushrods had been
manufactured with tubes having the incorrect heat treatment. We are
issuing this AD to prevent loss of rudder control, reduced
directional control of the airplane on the ground, or a jammed nose
landing gear (NLG) door that could prevent the NLG from retracting
or extending.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Replace Brake Rudder Control Pushrod--Model DHC-8-100, -200, -300

    For Model DHC-8-102,-103,-106,-201, -202,-301,-311, and -315
airplanes, serial numbers 464, 508, 511 through 513 inclusive, and
515 through 588 inclusive: Within 3,000 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, replace the affected brake rudder control
pushrod, part number (P/N) 82710274-001, by incorporating Modsum
8Q101334, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-27-100, Revision A, dated March 22,
2011.

(h) Replace NLG Door Pushrod--Model DHC-8-200, -300

    For Model DHC-8-201, -202, -301, -311, and -315 airplanes,
serial numbers 552 through 588 inclusive: Within 6,000 flight hours
after the effective date of this AD, replace nose landing gear door
pushrod, P/N 83232012-001, by incorporating Modsum 8Q101335, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 8-32-156, dated February 26, 2010.

(i) Replace NLG Door Pushrod--Model DHC-8-400

    For Model DHC-8-400, -401, and -402 airplanes, serial numbers
4003 through 4005 inclusive, 4009 through 4011 inclusive, 4016,
4017, and 4024 through 4072 inclusive: Within 6,000 flight hours
after the effective date of this AD, replace nose landing gear door
pushrod, P/N 83232012-001, by incorporating Modsum 4-113457, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-32-28, dated November 27, 2008.

(j) Replace Brake Rudder Control and Rudder Control Pushrods--Model
DHC-8-400

    For Model DHC-8-400, -401, and -402 airplanes, serial numbers
4001, 4003 through 4006 inclusive, and 4008 through 4072 inclusive:
Within 3,000 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
replace brake rudder control pushrod, P/N 82710274-001, and rudder
control pushrod, P/N 82710028-003, by incorporating Modsum 4-113455,
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-27-21, Revision A, dated March 22, 2011.

(k) Replace Rudder Control Pushrod--Model DHC-8-100, -200, -300

    For Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -202, -301, -311, and -
315 airplanes, serial numbers 413, 443, 450 through 452 inclusive,
456, 458, 462 through 465 inclusive, 467 through 470 inclusive, and
473 through 588 inclusive: Within 3,000 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, replace rudder control pushrod, P/N
82710028-003, by incorporating Modsum 8Q101333, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-27-
99, dated October 10, 2008.

(l) Inspect/Replace NLG Landing Gear Door Pushrod

    For Model DHC-8-400, -401, and -402 airplanes, serial numbers
4006, 4008, 4012 through 4015 inclusive, 4018 through 4023
inclusive, and 4073 through 4197 inclusive: Within 6,000 flight
hours after the effective date of this AD, inspect the lot number of
the pushrod, P/N 83232012-001, for the nose landing gear door
mechanism, in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-75,
dated June 1, 2010.
    (1) If the lot number of the pushrod does not match any of those
listed in the table in paragraph 3.B.(2) of Bombardier Service

Bulletin 84-32-75, dated June 1, 2010, no further action is required
by this paragraph.
    (2) If the lot number of the pushrod matches any of those listed
in the table in paragraph 3.B.(2) of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-
32-75, dated June 1, 2010, before further flight, replace the
pushrod, in accordance with paragraph 3.B., Rectification, of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-75, dated June 1, 2010.

(m) Parts Installation

    For Model DHC-8-400, -401, and -402 airplanes, serial numbers
4006, 4008, 4012 through 4015 inclusive, 4018 through 4023
inclusive, and 4073 through 4197 inclusive: As of the effective date
of this AD, no person may install a pushrod, P/N 83232012-001, with
the lot number listed in the table in paragraph 3.B.(2) of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-75, dated June 1, 2010, on any
airplane.

(n) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraphs (g) and (j) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using the service bulletins
identified in paragraph (n)(1) or (n)(2) of this AD.
    (1) Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-27-100, dated October 10, 2008
(for paragraph (g) of this AD).
    (2) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-21, dated October 10, 2008
(for paragraph (j) of this AD).

(o) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 516-794-
5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(p) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI Canadian AD CF-2011-31, dated August 15, 2011, and
the Bombardier service bulletins identified in paragraphs (p)(1)
through (p)(6) of this AD, for related information.
    (1) Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-27-99, dated October 10, 2008.
    (2) Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-27-100, Revision A, dated
March 22, 2011.
    (3) Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-32-156, dated February 26,
2010.
    (4) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-21, Revision A, dated
March 22, 2011.
    (5) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-28, dated November 27,
2008.
    (6) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-75, dated June 1, 2010.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 24, 2012.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-10483 Filed 4-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


TITLE:  Course Approval and Records for Merchant Mariner Training
Schools.

OMB CONTROL NUMBER:  1625-0028

SUMMARY:  The information is needed to ensure that merchant marine
training schools meet minimal statutory requirements.  The information
is used to approve the curriculum, facility and faculty for these
schools.

NEED:  Section 7315 of 46 U.S.C. authorizes an applicant for a license
or document to substitute the completion of an approved course for a
portion of the required sea service.  Section 10.402 of 46 CFR contains
the Coast Guard regulations for course approval.

RESPONDENTS:  Merchant marine training schools.

FORMS:  NONE.

FREQUENCY:  Five years for reporting; one year for recordkeeping.

BURDEN:  The estimated burden has increased from 128,139 hours to
139,807 hours a year primarily due to an increase in the number of
responses.

CG-REG

28 Jul 2016

  PAGE  1  of   NUMPAGES  1