[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 147 (Tuesday, July 31, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36985-36989]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16275]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-83707; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2018-35]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its
NYSE American Equities Price List and the NYSE American Options Fee
Schedule

July 25, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that on July 13, 2018, NYSE American LLC (``Exchange'' or ``NYSE
American'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its NYSE American Equities Price
List (``Price List'') and the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule (``Fee
Schedule'') related to colocation to provide Users with access to the
systems, and connectivity to the data feeds, of various additional
third parties. In addition, the Exchange proposes to amend its Price
List and Fee Schedule to update the names of certain third parties to
reflect their current names. The proposed rule change is available on
the Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the co-location \4\ services offered
by the Exchange to provide Users \5\ with access to the systems, and
connectivity to the data feeds, of various additional third parties. In
addition, the Exchange proposes to amend its Price List and Fee
Schedule to update the names of certain third parties to reflect their
current names. The Exchange proposes to make the corresponding
amendments to the Exchange's Price List and Fee Schedule related to
these co-location services to reflect these proposed changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange initially filed rule changes relating to its
co-location services with the Commission in 2010. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 62961 (September 21, 2010), 75 FR 59299
(September 27, 2010) (SR-NYSEAmex-2010-80) (the ``Original Co-
location Filing''). The Exchange operates a data center in Mahwah,
New Jersey (the ``data center'') from which it provides co-location
services to Users.
    \5\ For purposes of the Exchange's co-location services, a
``User'' means any market participant that requests to receive co-
location services directly from the Exchange. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 76009 (September 29, 2015), 80 FR 60213
(October 5, 2015) (SR-NYSEMKT-2015-67). As specified in the Price
List and Fee Schedule, a User that incurs co-location fees for a
particular co-location service pursuant thereto would not be subject
to co-location fees for the same co-location service charged by the
Exchange's affiliates New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE LLC''),
NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'') and NYSE National, Inc. (``NYSE
National'' and, together, the ``Affiliate SROs''). See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 70176 (August 13, 2013), 78 FR 50471
(August 19, 2013) (SR-NYSEMKT-2013-67).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As set forth in the Price List and Fee Schedule, the Exchange
charges fees for connectivity to the execution systems of third party
markets and other content service providers (``Third Party Systems''),
and data feeds from third party markets and other content service
providers (``Third Party Data Feeds'').\6\ The lists of Third Party
Systems and Third Party Data Feeds are set forth in the Price List and
Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80309 (March 24,
2017), 82 FR 15725 (March 30, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-2016-63).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to provide access to BM&F Bovespa, Canadian
Securities Exchange (``CSE''), ITG TriAct MatchNow, NASDAQ Canada, Neo
Aequitas, Omega, and OTC Markets Group as additional Third Party
Systems (``Proposed Third Party Systems''). In addition, it proposes to
provide connectivity to the same third parties' data feeds, with the
exception of the OTC Markets Group \7\ (``Proposed Third Party Data
Feeds'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Exchange currently provides connectivity to the OTC
Markets Group data feed as a Third Party Data Feed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    BM&F Bovespa is a Brazilian national securities exchange. CSE and
Neo Aequitas are Canadian national securities exchanges. NASDAQ Canada,
also Canadian national securities exchange, operates three trading
books for trading in Canadian securities: CXC, CXD, and CX2. ITG TriAct
MatchNow and Omega are Canadian alternative markets that match customer
orders in Canadian securities. OTC Markets Group operates trading
platforms for over-the-counter securities.
    The Exchange would provide access to the Proposed Third Party
Systems (``Access''), and connectivity to the Proposed Third Party Data
Feeds (``Connectivity''), as conveniences to Users. Use of Access or
Connectivity would be completely voluntary. The Exchange is not aware
of any impediment to third parties offering Access or Connectivity.
    The Exchange does not have visibility into whether third parties
currently offer, or intend to offer, Users access to the Proposed Third
Party Systems and connectivity to the Proposed Third Party Data Feeds,
as such third parties are not required to make that information public.
However, if one or more third parties presently offer, or in the future
opt to offer, such Access and Connectivity to Users, a User may utilize
the Secure Financial Transaction Infrastructure (``SFTI'') network, a
third party telecommunication network, third party wireless network, a
cross connect, or a combination thereof to access such services and
products through a connection to an access center outside the data
center (which could be a SFTI access center, a third-party access
center, or both), another User, or a third party vendor.
Access to the Proposed Third Party Systems
    The Exchange proposes to revise the Price List and Fee Schedule to
provide that Users may obtain connectivity to the Proposed Third Party
Systems for a fee. As with the current Third Party Systems, Users would
connect to the Proposed Third Party Systems over the internet protocol
(``IP'') network, a local area network available in the data center.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74220 (February 6,
2015), 80 FR 7894 (February 12, 2015) (SR-NYSEMKT-2015-08) (notice
of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change to
include IP network connections).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As with the current Third Party Systems, in order to obtain access
to a Proposed Third Party System, the User would enter into an
agreement with the relevant Proposed Third Party, pursuant to which the
third party content service provider would charge the User for access
to the Proposed Third Party System. The Exchange would then establish a
unicast connection between the User and the Proposed Third Party System
over the IP network.\9\ The Exchange would charge the User for the
connectivity to the Proposed Third Party System. A User would only
receive, and only be charged for, access to the Proposed Third Party
System for which it enters into agreements with the third party content
service provider.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Information flows over existing network connections in two
formats: ``unicast'' format, which is a format that allows one-to-
one communication, similar to a phone line, in which information is
sent to and from the Exchange; and ``multicast'' format, which is a
format in which information is sent one-way from the Exchange to
multiple recipients at once, like a radio broadcast.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has no ownership interest in any of the Proposed Third
Party Systems. Establishing a User's access to a Proposed Third Party
System would not give the Exchange any right to use the Proposed Third
Party System. Connectivity to a Proposed Third Party System would not
provide access or order entry to the Exchange's execution system, and a
User's connection to the Proposed Third Party System would not be
through the Exchange's execution system.
    As with the existing connections to Third Party Systems, the
Exchange proposes to charge a monthly recurring fee for connectivity to
the Proposed Third Party Systems. Specifically, when a User requests
access to a Proposed Third Party System, it would identify the
applicable content service provider and what bandwidth connection it
required.
    The Exchange proposes to modify its Price List and Fee Schedule to
add the Proposed Third Party Systems to its existing list of Third
Party Systems. The Exchange does not propose to change the monthly
recurring fee the Exchange charges Users for unicast connectivity to
each Third Party System, including the Proposed Third Party Systems.
Connectivity to the Proposed Third Party Data Feeds
    The Exchange proposes to revise the Price List and Fee Schedule to
provide that Users may obtain connectivity to the Proposed Third Party
Data Feeds for a fee. The Exchange would receive a Proposed Third Party
Data Feed from the content service provider at the Exchange's data
center. The Exchange would then provide connectivity to that data to
Users for a fee. Users would connect to the Proposed Third Party Data
Feeds over the IP network.\10\ The Proposed Third Party Data Feeds
would include trading information concerning the securities that are
traded on the relevant Proposed Third Party Systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See supra note 8, at 7894 (``The IP network also provides
Users with access to away market data products'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In order to connect to a Proposed Third Party Data Feed, a User
would enter into a contract with the content service provider, pursuant
to which the content service provider would charge the User for the
data feed. The Exchange would receive the Proposed Third Party Data
Feed over its fiber optic network and, after the content service
provider and User entered into the contract and the Exchange received
authorization from the content service provider, the Exchange would re-
transmit the data to the User over the User's port. The Exchange would
charge the User for the connectivity to the Proposed Third Party Data
Feed. A User would only receive, and would only be charged for,
connectivity to a Proposed Third Party Data Feed for which it entered
into a contract.
    The Exchange has no affiliation with the sellers of the Proposed
Third Party Data Feeds. It would have no right to use the Proposed
Third Party Data Feeds other than as a redistributor of the data. The
Proposed Third Party Data Feeds would not provide access or order entry
to the Exchange's execution system. The Proposed Third Party Data Feeds
would not provide access or order entry to the execution systems of the
third parties generating the feeds. The Exchange would receive the
Proposed Third Party Data Feeds via arms-length agreements and it would
have no inherent advantage over any other distributor of such data.
    As it does with the existing Third Party Data Feeds, the Exchange
proposes to charge a monthly recurring fee for connectivity to the
Proposed Third Party Data Feeds. Depending on its needs and bandwidth,
a User may opt to receive all or some of the feeds or services included
in the Proposed Third Parties' Data Feeds.
    The Exchange proposes to add the following fees for connectivity to
the Proposed Third Party Data Feeds to its existing list in the Price
List and Fee Schedule: (i) A $3,000 per month fee for BM&F Bovespa;
(ii) a $1,500 per month fee for NASDAQ Canada; (iii) a $1,200 fee for
Neo Aequitas; and (iv) a $1,000 per month fee for each of the CSE, ITG
TriAct MatchNow and Omega.
Name Changes
    The Exchange proposes to update references to the International
Securities Exchange, LLC (``ISE'') to reflect its acquisition by
NASDAQ, Inc. (``NASDAQ'').\11\ The Exchange also proposes to update
references to Bats and Chicago Board Options Exchange (``Cboe'') to
reflect their business combination and name changes.\12\ In the
sections entitled, ``Connectivity to Third Party Systems'' and
``Connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds'', the Exchange proposes to
replace references to ``International Securities Exchange (ISE)'' with
``NASDAQ ISE''. The Exchange also proposes to delete a reference to
``BATS'' and replace it with ``Cboe BYX Exchange (CboeBYX), Cboe BZX
Exchange (CboeBZX), Cboe EDGA Exchange (CboeEDGA), and Cboe EDGX
Exchange (CboeEDGX)'' and to replace references to ``Chicago Board
Options Exchange (CBOE)'' with ``Cboe Exchange (Cboe) and Cboe C2
Exchange (C2)''. In each case, the names would be updated to their
current names, clearly delineating the third parties to which the
Exchange provides connectivity and access.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78119 (June 27,
2016), 81 FR 41611 (SR-ISE2016-11; SR-ISE Gemini-2016-05; SR-ISE
Mercury-2016-10) (Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Changes, Each as Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto, Relating
to a Corporate Transaction in Which Nasdaq, Inc. Will Become the
Indirect Parent of ISE, ISE Gemini, and ISE Mercury). See also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80325 (March 29, 2017), 82 FR
16445 (April 4, 2017) (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Proposed Rule Change To Rename the Exchange as Nasdaq ISE, LLC).
    \12\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81981
(October 30, 2017), 82 FR 51309 (November 3, 2017) (SR-CBOE-2017-
066); and 81962 (October 26, 2017), 82 FR 50711 (November 1, 2017)
(SR-BatsBZX-2017-70).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In a non-substantive change, the Exchange proposes to reorganize
the table of Third Party Systems to ensure it remains alphabetical in
light of the proposed name changes. The Exchange does not propose to
amend any fee related to connectivity to ISE or Cboe systems or access
to ISE or Cboe data.
General
    As is the case with all Exchange co-location arrangements, (i)
neither a User nor any of the User's customers would be permitted to
submit orders directly to the Exchange unless such User or customer is
a member organization, a Sponsored Participant or an agent thereof
(e.g., a service bureau providing order entry services); (ii) use of
the co-location services proposed herein would

be completely voluntary and available to all Users on a non-
discriminatory basis;\13\ and (iii) a User would only incur one charge
for the particular co-location service described herein, regardless of
whether the User connects only to the Exchange or to the Exchange and
one or more of the Affiliate SROs.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ As is currently the case, Users that receive co-location
services from the Exchange will not receive any means of access to
the Exchange's trading and execution systems that is separate from,
or superior to, that of other Users. In this regard, all orders sent
to the Exchange enter the Exchange's trading and execution systems
through the same order gateway, regardless of whether the sender is
co-located in the data center or not. In addition, co-located Users
do not receive any market data or data service product that is not
available to all Users, although Users that receive co-location
services normally would expect reduced latencies in sending orders
to, and receiving market data from, the Exchange.
    \14\ See SR-NYSEMKT-2013-67, supra note 6 at 50471. The
Affiliate SROs have also submitted substantially the same proposed
rule change to propose the changes described herein. See SR-NYSE-
2018-32, SR-NYSEArca-2018-52, and SR-NYSENat-2018-15.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed change is not otherwise intended to address any other
issues relating to co-location services and/or related fees, and the
Exchange is not aware of any problems that Users would have in
complying with the proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed fee change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\15\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,\16\ in particular, because
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and
perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest
and because it is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed changes would remove
impediments to, and perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market
and a national market system and, in general, protect investors and the
public interest because, by offering additional services, the Exchange
would give each User additional options for addressing its access and
connectivity needs, responding to User demand for access and
connectivity options. Providing additional services would help each
User tailor its data center operations to the requirements of its
business operations by allowing it to select the form and latency of
access and connectivity that best suits its needs.
    The Exchange would provide Access and Connectivity as conveniences
to Users. Use of Access or Connectivity would be completely voluntary.
The Exchange is not aware of any impediment to third parties offering
Access or Connectivity. The Exchange does not have visibility into
whether third parties currently offer, or intend to offer, Users access
to the Proposed Third Party Systems and connectivity to the Proposed
Third Party Data Feeds. However, if one or more third parties presently
offer, or in the future opt to offer, such access and connectivity to
Users, a User may utilize the SFTI network, a third party
telecommunication network, third party wireless network, a cross
connect, or a combination thereof to access such services and products
through a connection to an access center outside the data center (which
could be a SFTI access center, a third-party access center, or both),
another User, or a third party vendor.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed changes would remove
impediments to, and perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market
and a national market system and, in general, protect investors and the
public interest because, by offering Access and Connectivity to Users
when available, the Exchange would give Users additional options for
connectivity and access to new services as soon as they are available,
responding to User demand for access and connectivity options.
    The Exchange also believes that the proposed fee change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\17\ in particular, because
it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members, issuers and other persons using its
facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers,
issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed fee changes are consistent
with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act for multiple reasons. The Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market in which exchanges offer co-
location services as a means to facilitate the trading and other market
activities of those market participants who believe that co-location
enhances the efficiency of their operations. Accordingly, fees charged
for co-location services are constrained by the active competition for
the order flow of, and other business from, such market participants.
If a particular exchange charges excessive fees for co-location
services, affected market participants will opt to terminate their co-
location arrangements with that exchange, and adopt a possible range of
alternative strategies, including placing their servers in a physically
proximate location outside the exchange's data center (which could be a
competing exchange), or pursuing strategies less dependent upon the
lower exchange-to-participant latency associated with co-location.
Accordingly, the exchange charging excessive fees would stand to lose
not only co-location revenues but also the liquidity of the formerly
co-located trading firms, which could have additional follow-on effects
on the market share and revenue of the affected exchange.
    The Exchange believes that the additional services and fees
proposed herein would be equitably allocated and not unfairly
discriminatory because, in addition to the services being completely
voluntary, they would be available to all Users on an equal basis
(i.e., the same products and services would be available to all Users).
All Users that voluntarily selected to receive Access or Connectivity
would be charged the same amount for the same services. Users that
opted to use Access or Connectivity would not receive access or
connectivity that is not available to all Users, as all market
participants that contracted with the relevant market or content
provider would receive access or connectivity.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed charges would be
reasonable, equitably allocated and not unfairly discriminatory because
the Exchange would offer the Access and Connectivity as conveniences to
Users, but in order to do so must provide, maintain and operate the
data center facility hardware and technology infrastructure. The
Exchange must handle the installation, administration, monitoring,
support and maintenance of such services, including by responding to
any production issues. Since the inception of co-location, the Exchange
has made numerous improvements to the network hardware and technology
infrastructure and has established additional administrative controls.
The Exchange has expanded the network infrastructure to keep pace with
the increased number of services available to Users, including
resilient and redundant feeds. In addition, in order to provide Access
and Connectivity, the Exchange would maintain multiple connections to
each

Proposed Third Party Data Feed and Proposed Third Party System,
allowing the Exchange to provide resilient and redundant connections;
adapt to any changes made by the relevant third party; and cover any
applicable fees charged by the relevant third party, such as port fees.
In addition, Users would not be required to use any of their bandwidth
for Access and Connectivity unless they wish to do so.
    The Exchange believes the proposed fees for Access and Connectivity
would be reasonable because they would allow the Exchange to defray or
cover the costs associated with offering Users Access and Connectivity
while providing Users the convenience of receiving such Access and
Connectivity within co-location, helping them tailor their data center
operations to the requirements of their business operations.
    For the reasons above, the proposed changes would not unfairly
discriminate between or among market participants that are otherwise
capable of satisfying any applicable co-location fees, requirements,
terms and conditions established from time to time by the Exchange.
    The Exchange also believes that the proposal to update the names of
ISE, Bats and Cboe removes impediments to, and perfects the mechanisms
of, a free and open market and a national market system. The Exchange
does not propose to amend any fee related to connectivity to ISE or
Cboe systems or access to ISE or Cboe data. The Exchange simply
proposes to update its Price List and Fee Schedule to accurately
reflect NASDAQ's acquisition of ISE and the business combination and
name change of Bats and Cboe. Therefore, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change would avoid any potential investor confusion
regarding the third parties to which the Exchange provides access and
connectivity.
    The Exchange believes that the non-substantive change to ensure the
names in the table of Third Party Systems are in alphabetical order
would remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanisms of, a free and
open market and a national market system and, in general, protect
investors and the public interest because the amendment would clarify
Exchange rules and make it easier for market participants to find Third
Party Systems in the table. The Exchange believes that this proposed
non-substantive change is reasonable because the change would have no
impact on pricing or services offered. Rather, the change would
alleviate possible market participant confusion by making it easier to
find NASDAQ, ISE and Cboe in the table.
    For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is
consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\18\ the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change will not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act because all of the proposed services are completely
voluntary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that providing Users with additional options
for connectivity and access to new services would not impose any burden
on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act because such proposed Access and Connectivity
would satisfy User demand for access and connectivity options. The
Exchange would provide Access and Connectivity as conveniences equally
to all Users. The Exchange does not have visibility into whether third
parties currently offer, or intend to offer, Users access to the
Proposed Third Party Systems and connectivity to the Proposed Third
Party Data Feeds, as third parties are not required to make that
information public. However, if one or more third parties presently
offer, or in the future opt to offer, such access and connectivity to
Users, a User may utilize the SFTI network, a third party
telecommunication network, third party wireless network, a cross
connect, or a combination thereof to access such services and products
through a connection to an access center outside the data center (which
could be a SFTI access center, a third-party access center, or both),
another User, or a third party vendor. Users that opt to use the
proposed Access or Connectivity would not receive access or
connectivity that is not available to all Users, as all market
participants that contract with the content provider may receive access
or connectivity. In this way, the proposed changes would enhance
competition by helping Users tailor their Access and Connectivity to
the needs of their business operations by allowing them to select the
form and latency of access and connectivity that best suits their
needs.
    The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which
exchanges offer co-location services as a means to facilitate the
trading and other market activities of those market participants who
believe that co-location enhances the efficiency of their operations.
Accordingly, fees charged for co-location services are constrained by
the active competition for the order flow of, and other business from,
such market participants. If a particular exchange charges excessive
fees for co-location services, affected market participants will opt to
terminate their co-location arrangements with that exchange, and adopt
a possible range of alternative strategies, including placing their
servers in a physically proximate location outside the exchange's data
center (which could be a competing exchange), or pursuing strategies
less dependent upon the lower exchange-to-participant latency
associated with co-location. Accordingly, the exchange charging
excessive fees would stand to lose not only co-location revenues but
also the liquidity of the formerly co-located trading firms, which
could have additional follow-on effects on the market share and revenue
of the affected exchange. For the reasons described above, the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change reflects this competitive
environment.
    The Exchange believes that the proposal to update the name of ISE
to reflect its acquisition by NASDAQ and Bats and Cboe to reflect their
business combination and name change will not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The proposal is ministerial in nature and is not
designed to have any competitive impact. It simply seeks to update the
Price List and Fee Schedule to accurately reference these markets in
light of their recent name changes.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed non-substantive change to
ensure the names in the table of Third Party Systems are in
alphabetical order would not impose any burden on competition that is
not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because the change would have no impact on pricing or the services
offered. Rather, the change would alleviate possible market participant
confusion by making it easier to find Third Party Systems in the table.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \19\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\20\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \21\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \22\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\23\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange requests
that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay so that the
proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange
represents that the proposed rule changes present no new or novel
issues. According to the Exchange, waiver of the operative delay would
allow Users to access the Proposed Third Party Systems and the Proposed
Third Party Data Feeds without delay, which would assist Users in
tailoring their data center operations to the requirements of their
business operations. The Exchange also represents that the proposed
changes to the Price List would provide Users with more complete
information regarding their Access and Connectivity options. The
Exchange further asserts that waiver of the operative delay would help
avoid potential investor confusion by allowing the Exchange to
immediately update the names of the exchanges noted above to reflect
recent business combinations and name changes. The Commission believes
that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. Accordingly, the
Commission waives the 30-day operative delay and designates the
proposed rule change operative upon filing.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \23\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \24\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \25\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2018-35 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2018-35. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2018-35 and should be submitted
on or before August 21, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-16275 Filed 7-30-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 85 (Thursday, May 2, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18910-18911]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08885]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 33462]

Notice of Applications for Deregistration Under Section 8(f) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940

April 26, 2019.
    The following is a notice of applications for deregistration under
section 8(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for the month of
April 2019. A copy of each application may be obtained via the
Commission's website by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. An order granting each
application will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested
persons may request a hearing on any application by writing to the
SEC's Secretary at the address below and serving the relevant applicant
with a copy of the request, personally or by mail.
    Hearing requests should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on May
21, 2019, and should be accompanied by proof of service on applicants,
in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Pursuant to Rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the
desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason for the request,
and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing
may request notification by writing to the Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES: The Commission: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shawn Davis, Branch Chief, at (202)
551-6413 or Chief Counsel's Office at<PHONE_NUMBER>; SEC, Division of
Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549-8010.

ClearBridge American Energy MLP Fund Inc. [File No. 811-22805]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. The applicant
has transferred its assets to ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity
Fund Inc. and, on November 16, 2018, made a final distribution to its
shareholders based on net asset value. Expenses of $1,140,539 incurred
in connection with the reorganization were paid by the applicant's
investment adviser or an affiliate thereof.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on March 7, 2019.
    Applicant's Address: 620 Eighth Avenue, 49th Floor, New York, New
York 10018.

College & University Facility Loan Trust Two [File No. 811-05506]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. Applicant
currently has two beneficial owners and will continue to operate as a
private investment fund in reliance on Section 3(c)(1) of the Act.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on January 22, 2019.
    Applicant's Address: c/o U.S. Bank National Association, as Owner
Trustee, One Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110.

Deutsche DWS Value Series, Inc. [File No. 811-05385]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. The applicant has transferred its assets to
DWS Mid Cap Value Fund and DWS CROCI Equity Dividend Fund, each a
series of Deutsche DWS Investment Trust, and on August 1, 2018, made a
final distribution to its shareholders based on net asset value.
Expenses of $79,626 incurred in connection with the reorganization were
paid by the applicant.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on March 18, 2019.
    Applicant's Address: 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10154.

Deutsche Multi-Market Income Trust [File No. 811-05689]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On November
19, 2018, applicant made liquidating distributions to its shareholders
based on net asset value. Expenses of $997.50 incurred in connection
with the liquidation were paid by the applicant.
    Filing Date: The application was filed March 15, 2019.
    Applicant's Address: 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10154.

Deutsche Strategic Income Trust [File No. 811-08382]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On November
19, 2018, applicant made liquidating distributions to its shareholders
based on net asset value. Expenses of $997.50 incurred in connection
with the liquidation were paid by the applicant.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on March 15, 2019.
    Applicant's Address: 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10154.

Eagle Capital Appreciation Fund [File No. 811-04338]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. The applicant has transferred its assets to
Carillon Series Trust and, on November 17, 2017, made a final
distribution to its shareholders based on net asset value. Expenses of
$111,982.04 incurred in connection with the reorganization were paid by
the applicant's investment adviser and its affiliates.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on January 25, 2019, and
amended on April 12, 2019.
    Applicant's Address: 880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida
33716.

Eagle Growth & Income Fund [File No. 811-04767]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. The applicant has transferred its assets to
Carillon Series Trust and, on November 17, 2017, made a final
distribution to its shareholders based on net asset value. Expenses of
$95,655.82 incurred in connection with the reorganization were paid by
the applicant's investment adviser and its affiliates.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on January 25, 2019, and
amended on April 12, 2019.
    Applicant's Address: 880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida
33716.

Fidelity Systematic Investment Plans [File No. 811-01905]

    Summary: Applicant, a unit investment trust, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On November
16, 2018, applicant made liquidating distributions to its shareholders,
based on net asset value. Expenses of $47,735.85 incurred in connection
with

the liquidation were paid by Fidelity Investments Institutional
Operations Company, Inc.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on November 30, 2018, and
amended on April 18, 2019.
    Applicant's Address: Fidelity Distributors Corporation, 900 Salem
Street, Smithfield, Rhode Island 02917.

Multisector Income Portfolio [File No. 811-22786]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On June 22, 2018, applicant made liquidating
distributions to its shareholders based on net asset value. No expenses
were incurred in connection with the liquidation.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on February 21, 2019, and
amended on April 2, 2019.
    Applicant's Address: Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts
02110.

SMID-Cap Portfolio [File No. 811-10609]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On May 18, 2018, applicant made liquidating
distributions to its shareholders based on net asset value. No expenses
were incurred in connection with the liquidation.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on February 21, 2019, and
amended on April 12, 2019.
    Applicant's Address: Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts
02110.

Tax-Managed Global Small-Cap Portfolio [File No. 811-10599]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On January 19, 2018, applicant made
liquidating distributions to its shareholders based on net asset value.
No expenses were incurred in connection with the liquidation.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on March 5, 2019, and
amended on April 5, 2019.
    Applicant's Address: Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts
02110.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-08885 Filed 5-1-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


EPA REGISTRATION DIVISION - COMPANY NOTICE OF FILING FOR PESTICIDE PETITION

Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0769

EPA Registration Division contact: Sidney Jackson<PHONE_NUMBER>

Interregional Research Project Number 4
Pesticide Petition Number: 4E8310
EPA has received a pesticide petition number (PP#) 4E8310 from the Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4), IR-4 Project Headquarters, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 500 College Road East, Suite 201 W, Princeton, NJ 08450 proposing, pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part 180 by establishing a tolerance for residues of 1-naphthaleneacetic acid, including its metabolites and degradates, determined by measuring only 1-naphthaleneacetic acid and its conjugates, calculated as the Stoichiometric equivalent of 1-naphthaleneacetic acid,  in or on the raw agricultural commodity pomegranate at 0.05 parts per million (ppm).  EPA has determined that the petition contains data or information regarding the elements set forth in section 408 (d)(2) of  FDDCA; however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether the data support granting of the petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the petition.

A. Residue Chemistry

	1. Plant metabolism. EPA has now determined that the terminal residues of concern in plants are the parent compounds, 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and its conjugates, based on the nature of residues identified from apple and olive studies [MRID 43948501 and 44190501].1

	2. Analytical method. The nature of the residues of NAA is adequately understood and an acceptable analytical method is available for enforcement purposes.2

	3. Magnitude of residues. . Pomegranates  -  All total NAA residues from four pomegranate field trials were <0.050 ppm at a 45 day preharvest interval (PHI) after each application.

B. Toxicological Profile

	1. Acute toxicity.  NAA and all its conjugates show low acute toxicity.3

	2. Genotoxicty. NAA and all its conjugates are not mutagenic.3

	3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity. There was no evidence of developmental toxicity at highest doses tested of 250 mg/kg/day in the rat or 150 mg/kg/day of NAA in the rabbit administered by gavage during the critical gestation period of pregnancy.  Reproductive effects of NAA sodium salt occurred at 210 mg/kg/day and were limited to reduced litter survival and pup weight throughout lactation in both generations of offspring in a two generation reproduction study. Parental effects (reduced body weight gain and reduced food consumption) occurred at the same dose level.4

	4. Subchronic toxicity.  The most common short term effect from high exposures to NAA and all its conjugates is reduced body weight gain, seen at dose levels of 200 mg/kg/day and higher. 3

	5. Chronic toxicity. Repeated exposure in the oral toxicity studies primarily resulted in decreased body weight and body weight gain accompanied by decreased food consumption.  Other chronic effects included vomiting, stomach lesions and slight sinusoidal histiocytosis in the livers of males (dogs).  Studies in the rat and mouse have shown no evidence of carcinogenicity.4

	6. Animal metabolism. The metabolism studies of the acid and its acetamide and the ethyl ester in animals provide supporting evidence that the toxicity of these various forms of NAA would be expected to be similar since all are metabolized to the acid form and eliminated from the body within 36 to 48 hours after exposure as glycine and glucuronic acid conjugates.4

	7. Metabolite toxicology. EPA has not identified any metabolites of toxicological concern.3

	8. Endocrine disruption. As the appropriate screening and/or testing protocols under the Agency's (EDSP) have now been developed and vetted, the naphthalene acetates may be subjected to additional screening and/or testing to better characterize effects related to endocrine disruption.

C. Aggregate Exposure

	1. Dietary exposure. The acute and chronic aggregate risk assessments for naphthalene acetates include exposure from food and drinking water only.  Both acute and chronic aggregate risks are not of concern.3

	i. Food. Based on analyses of estimated dietary risks for the general U.S. population and various population subgroups, the acute and chronic dietary exposure estimates for naphthalene acetates are significantly below EPA's level of concern for all supported commodities and not a risk of concern.3

	ii. Drinking water. Based on screening level computer models that provide high-end estimates of pesticide concentrations for surface and ground water sources, all estimates of drinking water concentrations (EDWCs) are low and do not pose risks of concern.3

	2. Non-dietary exposure. Residential  -  Estimated dermal and inhalation margin of exposures (MOEs) for the most highly exposed scenario of residential exposure to the naphthalene acetates are well above the target MOE of 100 and do not pose risks of concern.  Occupational Handler  -  The Agency believes all naphthalene acetate handler risks are not of concern and all handlers will only be required to wear baseline personal protection equipment (PPE).  Post-Application Exposure  -  The MOEs for the two post-application exposure scenarios are well above the target MOE of 100 on the day of application and, therefore, not of risk concern.3

D. Cumulative Effects

	Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made a common mechanism of toxicity finding for the naphthalene acetates.  They do not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances.  Therefore, for the purpose of risk assessments, EPA has not assumed that the naphthalene acetates have a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances.3

E. Safety Determination.
Acute and chronic risk estimates for all commodities are less than 100% of the acute population adjusted dose (aPAD) (0.5 mg/kg/day) and chronic population adjusted dose (cPAD) (0.15 mg/kg/day).2  The % aPAD and % cPAD utilized by the proposed tolerances are for small use minor crops and are not expected to add to the existing percentages.

	1. U.S. population. 2% of the aPAD and 1% of the cPAD.3

	2. Infants and children. Infants  -  8% of the aPAD and 6% of the cPAD.
Children  -  10% of the aPAD and 8% of the cPAD.3

F. International Tolerances

	No maximum residue limits (MRLs) for NAA, its salts, ester, and acetamide have been established in the Codex Alimentarius, the food code established by the UN's World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization;  therefore, issues of compatibility between Codex MRLs and U.S. tolerances do not exist.  Moreover, no Canadian or Mexican MRLs have been established for naphthalene acetates.3

FOOTNOTES:
1.  1-Naphthaleneacetic Acid (NAA), its Salts, Ester, and Acetamide.  Residue Chemistry Considerations for Reregistration Eligibility Decision. Case No. 0379.
2.  Enclosed Petition Proposing Tolerances for NAA Use in Avocado, Mango, Mamey Sapote and Rambutan
3.  Amended Reregistration Eligibility Decision.  October 2007.
4.  1-Naphthaleneacetic Acid  -  Toxicology Disciplinary Chapter for the Reassessment Eligibility Decision (RED) (or Registration Support) Document (Revised).  March 8, 2004


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 108 (Wednesday, June 5, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33784-33785]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13187]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2013-0062; FRL-9819-9]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Kentucky:
Kentucky Portion of Cincinnati-Hamilton, Supplement Motor Vehicle
Emissions Budget Update

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Kentucky State
Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted to EPA on August 9, 2012, by the
Commonwealth of Kentucky, through the Kentucky Energy and Environment
Cabinet, Division for Air Quality. Kentucky's August 9, 2012, SIP
revision includes changes to the maintenance plan for the Kentucky
portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN, maintenance area for the
1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). The
Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN, maintenance area for the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS includes the counties of Boone, Campbell and Kenton in
Kentucky (hereafter also referred to as Northern Kentucky); a portion
of Dearborn County, Indiana; and the entire counties of Butler,
Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton and Warren in Ohio. Kentucky's August 9,
2012, SIP revision proposes to update the motor vehicle emissions
budget using an updated mobile emissions model, the Motor Vehicle
Emissions Simulator (also known as MOVES2010a), and to increase the
safety margin allocated to motor vehicle emissions budgets for nitrogen
oxides and volatile organic compounds for Northern Kentucky to account
for changes in the emissions model and vehicle miles traveled
projection model. EPA is proposing to approve this SIP revision because
the Commonwealth has demonstrated that it is consistent with the Clean
Air Act.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 5, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2013-0062, by one of the following methods:
    1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    4. Mail: EPA-R04-OAR-2013-0062, Regulatory Development Section, Air
Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
    5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Ms. Lynorae Benjamin, Chief,
Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours
of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of business is
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal holidays.
    Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules
section of this Federal Register for detailed instructions on how to
submit comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Sheckler of the Air Quality and
Transportation Modeling Section, in the Air Planning Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. Kelly Sheckler may be reached by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
or via electronic mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules Section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP revision as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no
further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the
direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received
will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed
rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document.
Any parties

interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.
    For additional information see the direct final rule which is
published in the Rules Section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: May 22, 2013.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2013-13187 Filed 6-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 131 (Friday, July 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 40346]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17135]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings No. 2

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP10-21-006.
    Applicants: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC submits its
Refund Report pursuant to Article VI, Section 4 of the Stipulation and
Agreement.
    Filed Date: 06/27/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110628-0201.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-1197-001.
    Applicants: Mojave Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Mojave Pipeline Company, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.203: Order 587-U Compliance FDD Diversion IT to be effective 8/1/
2011.
    Filed Date: 06/30/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110630-5128.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, July 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1566-004.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company.
    Description: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company submits tariff filing
per 154.203: Compliance Motion Rate Case Sheets--Tech Conference to be
effective 6/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/30/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110630-5227.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, July 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2174-001.
    Applicants: High Island Offshore System, LLC.
    Description: High Island Offshore System, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.501: Refund Report--RP09-487 to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 06/30/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110630-5141.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, July 12, 2011.

    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on all
the parties to the proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 1, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-17135 Filed 7-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59623-59624]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23522]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Parts 121 and 135

[Docket No. FAA-2000-7119]
RIN 2120-AG89

Emergency Medical Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; notice of policy change and availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action supplements the preamble published in the Federal
Register on April 12, 2001 (66 FR 19028). The FAA has reviewed data for
automated external defibrillators and enhanced emergency medical kits
to amend the ``no go'' provision. Data show that allowing these items
to be incomplete, missing, or inoperative for one flight in accordance
with the FAA master minimum equipment list does not adversely affect
aviation safety. This action provides notice of the data finding and
makes available the corresponding policy change for the one-flight
relief for use of emergency medical equipment.

DATES: This action becomes effective September 27, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory J. Janosik, New Program
Implementation and International Support Branch, Air Transportation
Division, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: 202-267-
8166; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rule entitled, ``Emergency
Medical Equipment,'' published on April 12, 2001 (66 FR 19028), the
preamble states that automated external defibrillators (AED) should be,
and enhanced emergency medical kits (EMK) should remain, ``no-go''
items. See 66 FR 19033. That final rule's preamble also states that the
current provision under Sec.  121.279(a), with adoption of Sec.
121.803(a) without the words ``unless authorized by the Administrator''
would remain until the FAA developed more experience with the enhanced
EMKs and AEDs. Id.
    As described in the background section, the FAA has data obtained
from the airline industry to demonstrate that use of the emergency
medical equipment required by Sec.  121.803(a) would rarely be used on
back-to-back flights and therefore has allowed relief for one flight
with an incomplete, missing, or inoperative Emergency Medical Kit (EMK)
or automated external defibrillator (AED). A copy of Master Minimum
Equipment List (MMEL) Policy Letter (PL) 73, Revision 5, Relief for
Emergency Medical Equipment, is available for review on the Flight
Standards Information Management System found on the FAA's Web site at:
http:// fsims.faa.gov/. A copy will also be posted to the docket for
this action.

Background

    FAA PL-73, MMEL Relief for Emergency Medical Equipment, was
originally issued on March 4, 1994. The PL was created to provide
standardized MMEL requirements for the deferral of approved emergency
medical equipment, including EMK, First Aid Kits (FAK), and AEDs
required by 14 CFR Sec.  121.803. The purpose of the PL has remained
consistent throughout its five revisions, although the relief specifics
have been further defined. Revision 1 reformatted the PL to conform to
PL standardization requirements. Revision 2 expanded the relief for
FAKs to include relief for all emergency medical equipment. Revision 3
clarified that emergency medical equipment in excess of the regulatory
requirements can be inoperative. Revision 4 provided three-flight
limited dispatch authority for all incomplete, missing, or inoperative
EMKs, FAKs, and AEDs that do not meet the minimum regulatory
requirements. Revision 5 reduced the limited dispatch authority
available from three flights to one flight in all situations.
    On April 6, 2001, the FAA issued the final rule requiring certain
aircraft operating under part 121 to carry EMKs, FAKs, and AEDs. See 66
FR 19028. The final rule's preamble reflected the FAA's long-standing
position that emergency medical equipment items are ``no-go'' items and
AEDs should also be considered ``no-go'' items meaning that if they are
not operating pursuant to the regulatory standard then the flight
should not be permitted to takeoff. In that final rule, the FAA also
indicated

that the ``no go'' policy would remain in effect until the agency
develops more experience with the equipment. Consistent with the
regulation, the FAA issued Advisory Circular (AC) 121-33B which
restated the policy that ``EMKs and AEDs are `no-go' items and must be
carried as indicated on the'' MEL on January 12, 2006. The AC indicated
that the air carrier may elect to carry redundant equipment to ensure
that after use of the equipment in flight, the minimum required
equipment is still on board the aircraft.
    However, on April 12, 2006, the FAA issued Notice 8000.320, which
allowed MMEL relief for EMKs and AEDs, despite the contrary statements
in the rule and AC discussed earlier. The FAA allowed the MMEL relief
based on data collected from major air carriers, beginning in 1998 that
showed using an EMK on back-to-back flights was rare. The notice also
determined that ``a large number of passengers may be at more risk at a
diversion airport than they would be if MMEL relief'' was available
allowing the aircraft to be dispatched to its intended destination.
This notice, which reversed previous FAA policy as stated in the
preamble to the 2001 final rule, was not published for public comment
before its issuance. It was eventually cancelled after 12 months on
April 12, 2007.
    On April 18, 2006, soon after the release of Notice 8000.320, the
FAA released PL-73, Revision 4, MMEL Relief for Emergency Medical
Equipment. Consistent with Notice 8000.320, this revision granted
limited dispatch authority for aircraft with EMKs, FAKs, and AEDs that
did not meet the minimum requirements of 14 CFR Sec.  121.803. PL-73,
Revision 4 authorized an air carrier to complete up to three flight
cycles (3 flights) without the required equipment allowing time for the
air carrier to repair or replace emergency medical equipment. PL-73,
Revision 4 remained in effect until June 15, 2011.
    PL-73, Revision 5 was released on June 15, 2011. Revision 5
resulted from a review conducted by FAA Flight Standards Service, which
concluded that the MMEL relief offered by revision 4 was not consistent
with regulation and was counter to the FAA's established position that
EMKs and AEDs are ``no-go'' items. Revision 5 allows only one flight
cycle (1 flight), in any situation, for an air carrier to obtain the
minimum required emergency medical equipment on board the aircraft.
However, upon review of the policy, the FAA concluded that revision 5,
though more restrictive than revision 4, is still not consistent with
the regulation nor does it comply with the intent of the regulation as
expressed in the preamble. Because revision 5 was a shift in the FAA's
stated policy, the public should have been notified and provided
opportunity for comment before adopting the new policy.
    The FAA's position is that although the preamble to the rule is
clear that EMKs and AEDs are ``no go'' items, as contemplated by that
final rule. Our experience has led us to conclude that relief should be
allowed in limited circumstances. However, it is foreseeable that
required medical equipment may be used during a flight, and the pilot
will divert the aircraft to a location where the utilized medical
equipment cannot be replenished or replaced. Therefore, the FAA has
determined that allowing the air carrier to conduct one flight so that
the aircraft can fly to a location where supplies are available would
allow passengers on such a flight to reach their destinations without
adversely affecting safety. As discussed earlier, air carriers have
presented statistical information about EMK usage on aircraft to the
FAA, which indicates that once an EMK or AED is used during a flight,
there is only a remote possibility that it would need to be used on the
next flight.
    Airlines for America (A4A) recently resubmitted that data along
with an analysis of EMK use to support its position that three-flight
relief would be acceptable. A4A's analysis was based on the likelihood
of using an EMK on the first successive flight and extrapolated that
data to conclude the likelihood of using an EMK on three consecutive
flights would be 1: 3.8 x 10-\13\. The FAA evaluated A4A's
analysis and determined that the conclusion regarding use on three
consecutive flights was not statistically valid. The FAA notes that
A4A's analysis failed to consider that the likelihood of needing to use
an EMK on any of the three successive flights would be the same as
needing it on the first flight. A4A's letter has been placed in the
docket associated with this notice.
    The probability of needing an EMK does not decrease because an EMK
was opened on the first flight. We believe, therefore, that the
probability of needing the EMK on subsequent flights would be 5.5 x
10-\5\ to 7.8 x 10-\5\ (3 times as high as the
one-flight case). Therefore, because there is a relatively low
probability of needing the EMK on any particular flight, we are
allowing one-flight relief to air carriers with an inoperative EMK or
AED so that if the flight lands at a location where the equipment
cannot be repaired or replenished, the airplane can move to a location
where such services are available. However, because the probability of
needing to use an EMK on subsequent flights does not diminish, we do
not believe that three-flight relief would be acceptable.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 18, 2013.
John S. Duncan,
Director, FAA Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-23522 Filed 9-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42934-42938]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19076]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 31153; Amdt. No. 3764]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule amends, suspends, or removes Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports. These
regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or revised
criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National Airspace
System, such as the commissioning of new navigational facilities,
adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements. These
changes are designed to provide for the safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective September 13, 2017. The compliance date
for each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of September 13, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matter incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:

For Examination

    1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Ops-M30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., West Bldg., Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
    2. The FAA Air Traffic Organization Service Area in which the
affected airport is located;

    3. The office of Aeronautical Navigation Products, 6500 South
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

Availability

    All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available online free
of charge. Visit the National Flight Data Center online at nfdc.faa.gov
to register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP
copies may be obtained from the FAA Air Traffic Organization Service
Area in which the affected airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Nichols, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS-420) Flight Technologies and Procedures Division,
Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) by amending the referenced SIAPs.
The complete regulatory description of each SIAP is listed on the
appropriate FAA Form 8260, as modified by the National Flight Data
Center (NFDC)/Permanent Notice to Airmen (P-NOTAM), and is incorporated
by reference under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 CFR 97.20.
The large number of SIAPs, their complex nature, and the need for a
special format make their verbatim publication in the Federal Register
expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use the regulatory
text of the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic depiction on charts
printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. Thus, the advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP contained on FAA form documents is
unnecessary.
    This amendment provides the affected CFR sections, and specifies
the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs with their applicable effective
dates. This amendment also identifies the airport and its location, the
procedure and the amendment number.

Availability and Summary of Material Incorporated by Reference

    The material incorporated by reference is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section.
    The material incorporated by reference describes SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs as identified in the amendatory language for part 97
of this final rule.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP as amended in the
transmittal. For safety and timeliness of change considerations, this
amendment incorporates only specific changes contained for each SIAP
and Takeoff Minimums and ODP as modified by FDC permanent NOTAMs.
    The SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, as modified by FDC
permanent NOTAM, and contained in this amendment are based on the
criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for Terminal Instrument
Procedures (TERPS). In developing these changes to SIAPs and Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied only to specific
conditions existing at the affected airports. All SIAP amendments in
this rule have been previously issued by the FAA in a FDC NOTAM as an
emergency action of immediate flight safety relating directly to
published aeronautical charts.
    The circumstances that created the need for these SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP amendments require making them effective in less than
30 days.
    Because of the close and immediate relationship between these
SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find
that notice and public procedure under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are
impracticable and contrary to the public interest and, where
applicable, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d), good cause exists for making these
SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air traffic control, Airports, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 25, 2017.
John S. Duncan,
Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal regulations, Part 97, (14 CFR part 97), is amended by
amending Standard Instrument Approach Procedures and Takeoff Minimums
and ODPs, effective at 0901 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113,
40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:
    By amending: Sec.  97.23 VOR, VOR/DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME or
TACAN; Sec.  97.25 LOC, LOC/DME, LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME; Sec.
97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; Sec.  97.29 ILS, ILS/DME, MLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV;
Sec.  97.31 RADAR SIAPs; Sec.  97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and Sec.  97.35 COPTER
SIAPs, Identified as follows:

* * * Effective Upon Publication

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        AIRAC date            State             City               Airport          FDC No.      FDC date                      Subject
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12-Oct-17................  MI           Battle Creek.......  W K Kellogg........       7/0799       8/2/17  This NOTAM, published in TL 17-20, is hereby
                                                                                rescinded in its entirety.
12-Oct-17................  ID           Pocatello..........  Pocatello Rgnl.....       7/1022       8/2/17  This NOTAM, published in TL 17-20, is hereby
                                                                                rescinded in its entirety.

12-Oct-17................  OH           Mansfield..........  Mansfield Lahm Rgnl       7/5241       8/2/17  This NOTAM, published in TL 17-20, is hereby
                                                                                rescinded in its entirety.
12-Oct-17................  CA           Bakersfield........  Meadows Field......       7/6052       8/2/17  This NOTAM, published in TL 17-20, is hereby
                                                                                rescinded in its entirety.
12-Oct-17................  NY           Elmira/Corning.....  Elmira/Corning Rgnl       7/6084       8/2/17  This NOTAM, published in TL 17-20, is hereby
                                                                                rescinded in its entirety.
12-Oct-17................  GA           Savannah...........  Savannah/Hilton           7/9349       8/2/17  This NOTAM, published in TL 17-20, is hereby
                                                              Head Intl.                                     rescinded in its entirety.
12-Oct-17................  IA           Dubuque............  Dubuque Rgnl.......       7/9350       8/2/17  This NOTAM, published in TL 17-20, is hereby
                                                                                rescinded in its entirety.
12-Oct-17................  MI           Pontiac............  Oakland County Intl       7/9870       8/2/17  This NOTAM, published in TL 17-20, is hereby
                                                                                rescinded in its entirety.
12-Oct-17................  MS           Natchez............  Hardy-Anders Field        7/0374      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 31, Amdt 1A.
                                                              Natchez-Adams
                                                              County.
12-Oct-17................  MS           Natchez............  Hardy-Anders Field        7/0375      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Amdt 1A.
                                                              Natchez-Adams
                                                              County.
12-Oct-17................  TX           Decatur............  Decatur Muni.......       7/0378      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Orig.
12-Oct-17................  NY           Schenectady........  Schenectady County.       7/0419      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Orig-D.
12-Oct-17................  VA           Moneta.............  Smith Mountain Lake       7/0439      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Orig-B.
12-Oct-17................  AK           Kokhanok...........  Kokhanok...........       7/0447      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 6, Orig-C.
12-Oct-17................  AK           Kokhanok...........  Kokhanok...........       7/0448      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, Orig-C.
12-Oct-17................  WY           Guernsey...........  Camp Guernsey......       7/0520      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig-B.
12-Oct-17................  NV           Las Vegas..........  Mc Carran Intl.....       7/0577      8/22/17  VOR RWY 26L/R, Amdt 4.
12-Oct-17................  ND           Fargo..............  Hector Intl........       7/0712      8/22/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Amdt 1A.
12-Oct-17................  NC           Greensboro.........  Piedmont Triad Intl       7/0800       8/8/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 23R, Orig-B.
12-Oct-17................  AR           Ash Flat...........  Sharp County Rgnl..       7/0852      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Orig.
12-Oct-17................  SC           Marion.............  Marion County......       7/1016      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Amdt 1.
12-Oct-17................  TN           Knoxville..........  Mc Ghee Tyson......       7/1098      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 23R, Amdt 2.
12-Oct-17................  TN           Knoxville..........  Mc Ghee Tyson......       7/1100      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 5L, Amdt 2.
12-Oct-17................  GA           Pine Mountain......  Harris County......       7/1145      8/10/17  VOR-A, Amdt 5A.
12-Oct-17................  NC           Greensboro.........  Piedmont Triad Intl       7/1158       8/8/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 5L, Orig-B.
12-Oct-17................  OK           Goldsby............  David Jay Perry....       7/1921      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 31, Orig.
12-Oct-17................  CA           Beckwourth.........  Nervino............       7/1926      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 26, Orig-C.
12-Oct-17................  AK           King Salmon........  King Salmon........       7/2193      8/10/17  ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 12, Amdt 18A.
12-Oct-17................  NC           Kinston............  Kinston Rgnl              7/2200      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Amdt 3.
                                                              Jetport At
                                                              Stallings Fld.
12-Oct-17................  NC           Kinston............  Kinston Rgnl              7/2204      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Amdt 3.
                                                              Jetport At
                                                              Stallings Fld.
12-Oct-17................  TN           Memphis............  Memphis Intl.......       7/3222      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 18L, Amdt 2B.
12-Oct-17................  AK           Barrow.............  Wiley Post-Will           7/3224      8/22/17  ILS OR LOC RWY 7, Amdt 1.
                                                              Rogers Memorial.
12-Oct-17................  MN           Sauk Centre........  Sauk Centre Muni...       7/3286      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Amdt 1.
12-Oct-17................  MN           Sauk Centre........  Sauk Centre Muni...       7/3287      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Orig.
12-Oct-17................  IL           Bloomington/Normal.  Central Il Rgnl           7/3397      8/10/17  ILS OR LOC RWY 20, ILS RWY 20 (CAT II), Amdt
                                                              Arpt At                                        3A.
                                                              Bloomington-Normal.
12-Oct-17................  OH           Cleveland..........  Burke Lakefront....       7/3986      8/14/17  ILS OR LOC RWY 24R, Amdt 1.
12-Oct-17................  GA           Pine Mountain......  Harris County......       7/4505      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Orig-A.
12-Oct-17................  NM           Truth Or             Truth Or                  7/4682       8/8/17  VOR-A, Amdt 9C.
                                         Consequences.        Consequences Muni.
12-Oct-17................  NC           Statesville........  Statesville Rgnl...       7/4740      8/10/17  ILS OR LOC/DME Y RWY 28, Orig.
12-Oct-17................  NC           Statesville........  Statesville Rgnl...       7/4742      8/10/17  ILS OR LOC/DME Z RWY 28, Amdt 1.
12-Oct-17................  NC           Statesville........  Statesville Rgnl...       7/4743      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Amdt 1.
12-Oct-17................  NC           Statesville........  Statesville Rgnl...       7/4744      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Amdt 3A.
12-Oct-17................  OR           Portland...........  Portland Intl......       7/4815      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 10R, Amdt 2A.
12-Oct-17................  KY           Louisville.........  Louisville Intl-          7/4828      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 35R, Amdt 1C.
                                                              Standiford Field.
12-Oct-17................  LA           New Orleans........  Louis Armstrong New       7/4829      8/14/17  ILS OR LOC RWY 29, Amdt 10.
                                                              Orleans Intl.
12-Oct-17................  MN           Rochester..........  Rochester Intl.....       7/4830      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 13, Amdt 1.
12-Oct-17................  NY           Syracuse...........  Syracuse Hancock          7/4831      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 28, Amdt 2B.
                                                              Intl.

12-Oct-17................  AK           Elim...............  Elim...............       7/4888      8/22/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 19, Orig-B.
12-Oct-17................  TX           Fort Worth.........  Fort Worth Alliance       7/4891      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 16R, Amdt 1.
12-Oct-17................  AK           Cold Bay...........  Cold Bay...........       7/4937      8/14/17  LOC/DME BC RWY 33, Amdt 10B.
12-Oct-17................  AK           Cold Bay...........  Cold Bay...........       7/4938      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 33, Amdt 2B.
12-Oct-17................  CA           Calipatria.........  Cliff Hatfield            7/5126      8/10/17  Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig.
                                                              Memorial.
12-Oct-17................  AK           Kwethluk...........  Kwethluk...........       7/5560      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig-A.
12-Oct-17................  AK           Kwethluk...........  Kwethluk...........       7/5561      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Orig-A.
12-Oct-17................  CO           Denver.............  Denver Intl........       7/5909       8/8/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 7, Amdt 1A.
12-Oct-17................  CO           Denver.............  Denver Intl........       7/5912       8/8/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 16L, Amdt 1B.
12-Oct-17................  CO           Denver.............  Denver Intl........       7/5914       8/8/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 16R, Amdt 1B.
12-Oct-17................  CO           Denver.............  Denver Intl........       7/5916       8/8/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 17R, Amdt 1B.
12-Oct-17................  CO           Denver.............  Denver Intl........       7/5921       8/8/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 26, Amdt 1A.
12-Oct-17................  CO           Denver.............  Denver Intl........       7/5922       8/8/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 34L, Amdt 2B.
12-Oct-17................  CO           Denver.............  Denver Intl........       7/5935       8/8/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 34R, Amdt 2A.
12-Oct-17................  CO           Denver.............  Denver Intl........       7/5938       8/8/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 35L, Amdt 2A.
12-Oct-17................  CO           Denver.............  Denver Intl........       7/5939       8/8/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 35R, Amdt 2A.
12-Oct-17................  TX           Amarillo...........  Rick Husband              7/5974       8/8/17  ILS OR LOC RWY 4, Amdt 22D.
                                                              Amarillo Intl.
12-Oct-17................  MN           Minneapolis........  Minneapolis-St Paul       7/6114      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 12R, Amdt 4.
                                                              Intl/Wold-
                                                              Chamberlain.
12-Oct-17................  PR           Aguadilla..........  Rafael Hernandez...       7/6264      8/22/17  VOR/DME OR TACAN RWY 26, Orig-C.
12-Oct-17................  NM           Truth Or             Truth Or                  7/6298       8/8/17  RNAV (GPS)-A, Orig.
                                         Consequences.        Consequences Muni.
12-Oct-17................  OH           Cleveland..........  Cleveland-Hopkins         7/6554      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 24R, Amdt 3C.
                                                              Intl.
12-Oct-17................  NC           Raleigh/Durham.....  Raleigh-Durham Intl       7/6596       8/8/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 5R, Amdt 2A.
12-Oct-17................  MT           Libby..............  Libby..............       7/6820      8/22/17  RNAV (GPS)-A, Orig-C.
12-Oct-17................  TX           Corpus Christi.....  Corpus Christi Intl       7/7843      8/14/17  ILS OR LOC RWY 36, Amdt 13A.
12-Oct-17................  TX           La Porte...........  La Porte Muni......       7/7970      8/10/17  VOR-A, Orig-A.
12-Oct-17................  TX           Athens.............  Athens Muni........       7/8233      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Orig.
12-Oct-17................  GA           Atlanta............  Hartsfield-Jackson        7/8923      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) PRM RWY 27L (SIMULTANEOUS CLOSE
                                                              Atlanta Intl.                                  PARALLEL), Orig.
12-Oct-17................  GA           Atlanta............  Hartsfield-Jackson        7/8955      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) PRM RWY 9R (SIMULTANEOUS CLOSE
                                                              Atlanta Intl.                                  PARALLEL), Orig.
12-Oct-17................  GA           Atlanta............  Hartsfield-Jackson        7/8958      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) PRM Y RWY 10 (SIMULTANEOUS CLOSE
                                                              Atlanta Intl.                                  PARALLEL), Orig.
12-Oct-17................  GA           Atlanta............  Hartsfield-Jackson        7/8963      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) PRM Y RWY 26R (SIMULTANEOUS CLOSE
                                                              Atlanta Intl.                                  PARALLEL), Orig.
12-Oct-17................  GA           Atlanta............  Hartsfield-Jackson        7/8967      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) PRM Y RWY 28 (SIMULTANEOUS CLOSE
                                                              Atlanta Intl.                                  PARALLEL), Orig.
12-Oct-17................  GA           Atlanta............  Hartsfield-Jackson        7/8969      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) PRM Y RWY 8L (SIMULTANEOUS CLOSE
                                                              Atlanta Intl.                                  PARALLEL), Orig.
12-Oct-17................  GA           Atlanta............  Hartsfield-Jackson        7/8971      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 27L, Amdt 5.
                                                              Atlanta Intl.
12-Oct-17................  GA           Atlanta............  Hartsfield-Jackson        7/8972      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 9R, Amdt 4A.
                                                              Atlanta Intl.
12-Oct-17................  GA           Atlanta............  Hartsfield-Jackson        7/8994      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 08L, Amdt 4.
                                                              Atlanta Intl.
12-Oct-17................  GA           Atlanta............  Hartsfield-Jackson        7/8996      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 10, Amdt 4.
                                                              Atlanta Intl.
12-Oct-17................  GA           Atlanta............  Hartsfield-Jackson        7/8998      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 28, Amdt 4.
                                                              Atlanta Intl.
12-Oct-17................  GA           Atlanta............  Hartsfield-Jackson        7/8999      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 26R, Amdt 4.
                                                              Atlanta Intl.

12-Oct-17................  NH           Manchester.........  Manchester.........       7/9345      8/14/17  ILS OR LOC RWY 35, ILS RWY 35 (SA CAT I),
                                                                                ILS RWY 35 (CAT II AND III), Amdt 2B.
12-Oct-17................  TX           Beaumont/Port        Jack Brooks Rgnl...       7/9374      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 12, Orig.
                                         Arthur.
12-Oct-17................  TX           Corpus Christi.....  Corpus Christi Intl       7/9447      8/14/17  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 36, Amdt 2A.
12-Oct-17................  TX           Lubbock............  Lubbock Preston           7/9472      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Amdt 2B.
                                                              Smith Intl.
12-Oct-17................  OR           Madras.............  Madras Municipal...       7/9638      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 34, Orig-A.
12-Oct-17................  OR           Madras.............  Madras Municipal...       7/9640      8/10/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 16, Amdt 1A.
12-Oct-17................  GA           Atlanta............  Hartsfield-Jackson        7/9873       8/2/17  RNAV (GPS) RWY 09L, Amdt 4A.
                                                              Atlanta Intl.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2017-19076 Filed 9-12-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P