[Federal Register: December 28, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 248)]
[Notices]
[Page 73921-73923]
[DOCID:fr28de07-185]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-57012; File No. SR-CBOE-2007-03]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change and Amendment
No. 1 Thereto Amending its Obvious Error Rule for Options on Indices,
ETFs, and HOLDRS

December 20, 2007.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on February 21, 2007, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``CBOE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been substantially
prepared by the Exchange. On December 20, 2007, the CBOE submitted
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change,
as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend CBOE Rule 24 .16, which is the
Exchange's rule applicable to the nullification and adjustment of
transactions in index options, options on exchange-traded funds
(``ETFs''), and options on HOLding Company Depository ReceiptS
(``HOLDRS''). The Exchange is proposing to amend the rule in order to:
(i) Modify the nullification and adjustment provisions for erroneous
prints and erroneous quotes in the underlying; (ii) eliminate the
nullification and adjustment provision for trades below intrinsic
value; and (iii) modify the nullification provision for no bid series.
The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange, the
Commission's Public Reference Room, and http://www.cboe.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to make various amendments to CBOE Rule
24.16, which is its obvious error rule pertaining to index options,
options on ETFs, and options on HOLDRS. First, the proposal would
modify the rule's provisions pertaining to erroneous prints and
erroneous quotes in the underlying. Currently, the rule provides that a
trade resulting from an erroneous print disseminated in the underlying
market which is later cancelled or corrected by that underlying market
may be adjusted or nullified.\3\ Similarly, the rule also provides that
a trade resulting from an erroneous quote in the underlying security
may be adjusted or nullified.\4\ Under the revised rule, the
appropriate Exchange committee would identify particular underlying or
related instrument(s) that would be used to determine an erroneous
print or quote and would also identify the relevant market(s) trading
the underlying or related instrument to which the Exchange would look
for purposes of applying the obvious error analysis. The underlying or
related instrument(s) may include the underlying or related ETF(s),
HOLDRS(s), and/or index value(s),\5\ and/or related futures
product(s),\6\ and the relevant underlying market(s) may include one or
more markets. The underlying or related instrument(s) and relevant
market(s) would be designated by the appropriate Exchange committee and
announced to the membership via Regulatory Circular. For a particular
ETF, HOLDRS, index value, and/or futures product to qualify for
consideration as a ``related instrument,'' the revised rule requires
that: (i) The option class and related instrument must be derived from
or designed to track the same underlying index; or (ii) in the case of
S&P 100-related options, the options class and related instrument must
be derived from or designed to track the S&P 100 Index or the S&P 500
Index. Thus, as an example for illustrative purposes only, for options
on the Nasdaq 100 Index Tracking Stock (ETF option symbol ``QQQ'') ,
the appropriate Exchange committee may determine to designate the
underlying Nasdaq 100 ETF and the primary market where it trades, as
well as a related futures product overlying the Nasdaq 100 Index and
the primary market where that futures product trades, as the
instruments that would be considered by the Exchange in determining
whether an erroneous print or an erroneous quote has occurred that
would form the basis for an adjustment or nullification to a
transaction in the related options.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Under the current rule, to be adjusted or nullified, the
trade must be the result of an erroneous print that is higher or
lower than the average trade in the underlying security during a
two-minute period before and after the erroneous print by an amount
at least five times greater than the average quote width for such
underlying security during the same period. See CBOE Rule
24.16(a)(3). 3
    \4\ Under the current rule, an erroneous quote occurs when the
underlying security has a width of at least $1.00 and has a width at
least five times greater than the average quote width for such
underlying security on the primary market during the time period
encompassing two minutes before and after the dissemination of such
quote. See Rule 24.16(a)(4).
    \5\ An ``index value'' is the value of an index as calculated
and reported by the index's reporting authority. Use of an index
value would only be applicable for purposes of identifying an
erroneous print in the underlying (and not an erroneous quote). See
proposed changes to CBOE Rule 24.16(a)(3).
    \6\ To confirm, the Exchange states that it is only proposing
that it may designate underlying or related ETF(s), HOLDRS(s), and/
or index value(s), and/or related futures product(s). The Exchange
states that it is not proposing to designate any of the individual
underlying stocks (or related options or futures on any of the
individual underlying stocks) that comprise a particular ETF, HOLDR,
or index (any such proposal would be the subject of a separate rule
filing).
    \7\ Using this example, under the revised rule, the designated
instruments and markets would be announced by Regulatory Circular.
Thereafter, for a transaction in the QQQ options class to be
adjusted or nullified due to an erroneous print in an underlying or
related instrument that is later cancelled or corrected, the trade
must be the result of: (i) An erroneous print in the underlying
Nasdaq 100 ETF that is higher or lower than the average trade in the
underlying Nasdaq 100 ETF on the primary market during a two-minute
period before and after the erroneous print by an amount at least
five times greater than the average quote width for the ETF during
the same period; or (ii) an erroneous print in the designated
futures product overlying the Nasdaq 100 Index that is higher or
lower than the average trade in the designated futures product on
the designated market during a two-minute period before and after
the erroneous print by an amount at least five times greater than
the average quote width for the futures product during the same
period. See proposed changes to CBOE Rule 24.16(a)(3). For an
options transaction to be adjusted or nullified due to an erroneous
quote in an underlying or related instrument, an erroneous quote
would occur when: (i) The underlying Nasdaq 100 ETF has a width of
at least $1.00 and has a width at least five times greater than the
average quote width for such ETF on the primary market during the
time period encompassing two minutes before and after the
dissemination of such quote; or (ii) the designated futures product
overlying the Nasdaq 100 Index has a width of at least $1.00 and has
a width at least five times greater than the average quote width for
such futures product on the designated market during the period
encompassing two minutes before and after the dissemination of such
quote. See proposed changes to CBOE Rule 24.16(a)(4).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As another example for illustrative purposes only, for the
Exchange's class of options on the S&P 100 Index (index option symbol
``OEX''), the appropriate Exchange committee may determine to designate
the following underlying or related instruments: the S&P 100 Index
value as calculated and reported by Standard and Poor's (the index's
reporting authority); the S&P Depository Receipts traded on the
American Stock Exchange; and the S&P 500 futures contract traded on the
Chicago Mercantile Exchange.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Using this example, under the revised rule, the designated
instruments and markets would be announced by Regulatory Circular.
Thereafter, for a transaction in the OEX options class to be
adjusted or nullified due to an erroneous print in an underlying or
related instrument that is later cancelled or corrected, the trade
must be the result of: (i) An erroneous report of the underlying S&P
100 Index value that is higher or lower than the average price in
the index during a two-minute period before and after the erroneous
report by an amount at least five times higher or lower than the
difference between the highest and lowest index values during the
same period; or (ii) an erroneous print in the S&P Depository
Receipts or S&P 500 futures contract, as applicable, that is higher
or lower than the average trade in the designated instrument during
a two-minute period before and after the erroneous print by an
amount at least five times greater than the average quote width for
the designated instrument during the same period. See proposed
changes to CBOE Rule 24.16(a)(3). To be adjusted or nullified due to
an erroneous quote in the underlying or related instrument, an
erroneous quote would occur when the S&P Depository Receipts or S&P
500 futures contract, as applicable, has a width of at least $1.00
and has a width at least five times greater than the average quote
width for such instrument on the relevant market during the time
period encompassing two minutes before and after the dissemination
of such quote. See proposed changes to CBOE Rule 24.16(a)(4) and
note 5 supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange states that the proposed change is intended to address
member feedback and to provide relief in those scenarios where an
erroneous options transaction may occur as the result of an erroneous
print or erroneous quote in markets other than the primary market for
the underlying security. The Exchange believes the proposed change
recognizes that market participants trading in the overlying index,
ETF, and HOLDRS options may base their options prices on trading in
various products and markets, while maintaining reasonable and
objective criteria for these types of obvious error reviews.
    Second, the proposal would eliminate the nullification and
adjustment provision for trades below intrinsic value. CBOE Rule
24.16(a)(5) currently states that an obvious pricing error will be
deemed to have occur when the transaction price of an option series is
more than $0.10 below the intrinsic value of the same option. The
purpose of deleting this provision is to account for circumstances
under which options are correctly priced $0.10 or more below the
intrinsic value. For example, this might occur in options with
underlying securities that are hard-to-borrow, extremely volatile
issues where one market participant seeks to transfer the risk of
selling or buying a security to other market participants by trading
options, and options that are European-style exercise thus preventing
exercise prior to expiration. Additionally, the Exchange notes that
elimination of this provision is consistent with the Exchange's current
rule for equity options, which does not have an obvious error review
for trades below intrinsic value.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See CBOE Rule 6.25.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Third, the proposal would modify the nullification provision for no
bid series. Currently, the rule simply provides that electronic
transactions in series that are quoted no bid on the Exchange are
subject to nullification provided that at least one strike price below
(for calls) or above (for puts) in the same options class was quoted no
bid at the time of execution. Under the revised rule, additional
criteria and clarifying language would be added. Specifically, an
electronic transaction in a series quoted no bid on the Exchange would
be subject to nullification provided: (i) The bid in that series
immediately preceding the execution was, and for five seconds prior to
the execution remained, zero; and (ii) at least one strike price below
(for calls) or above (for puts) in the same options class was quoted no
bid and offered at the same price or lower as that series at the time
of execution. Thus, for example, if a trade occurs in the ABC 45 call
option series when the series was quoted $0.00--$0.10, the trade may be
nullified if: (i) The bid was at $0.00 for at least five seconds prior
to the execution; and (ii) at least one call option series in ABC with
a strike below 45 (e.g., the ABC 30, 35 or 40 call option series) had a
bid of $0.00 and an offer of $0.10 or less at the time of execution.
    The revised no bid provision would provide that, when determining
the Exchange's quotes in the relevant series, bids and offers of the
parties to the subject trade that are in any of the series in the same
options class shall not be considered. The revised rule would also
provide that each group of series in an options class with a non-
standard deliverable will be treated as a separate options class. Thus,
for example, if due to a reorganization certain of the series in the
ABC option class have a deliverable of 150 shares per options contract
(as compared to the standard 100 shares per option contract), all ABC
option series that are subject to the 150 contract delivery
requirements would be considered separately from the ABC option series
that are subject to the 100 contract delivery requirements for purposes
of applying the no bid provision. Finally, the revised rule would
clarify that the no bid provision is intended to apply to series quoted
no bid on the Exchange (as opposed to series for which the national
best bid is quoted no bid).\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Consistent with the existing provisions, for a
nullification to be granted, any member or person associated with a
member that believes it participated in a transaction that falls
within the no bid series parameters must also satisfy the
notification procedures set forth in paragraph (b) of CBOE Rule
24.16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed changes to the no bid provision are intended to
address the Exchange's experience in applying the provision to
particular trading scenarios that have occurred. The Exchange believes
that the additional criteria and clarifications are reasonable and
objective, and would serve to better identify instances where the no
bid provision is intended to apply.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
section 6(b) of the Act,\11\ in general, and furthers the objectives of
section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\12\ in particular, in that it is designed
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received by the Exchange with
respect to the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding, or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
    A. By order approve the proposed rule change or
    B. Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-CBOE-2007-03 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2007-03. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2007-03 and should be
submitted on or before January 18, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-25198 Filed 12-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 125 (Friday, June 28, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 31060]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13827]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14988-000]

ECOsponsible, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Competing Applications

    On April 22, 2019, ECOsponsible, LLC, filed an application for a
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act
(FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of the Whitney Point Dam
Hydroelectric Project to be located at the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers' (Corps) Whitney Point Dam on the Otselic River in Broome
County, New York. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued,
is to grant the permit holder priority to file a license application
during the permit term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the
permit holder to perform any land-disturbing activities or otherwise
enter upon lands or waters owned by others without the owners' express
permission.
    The proposed project would consist of the following: (1) A new open
or covered 50-foot-wide intake flume with a New York State Department
of Environmental Conservation-approved trash rack design downstream of
the existing Corps' gated outlet; (2) a new 50-foot-long, 50-foot-wide,
50-foot-high powerhouse containing a turbine-generator unit with a
capacity of 6 megawatts; (3) an 800-foot-long, 60-foot-wide tailrace;
(4) a new switchyard adjacent to the existing parking lot; (5) a new
360-foot-long transmission line connecting the switchyard to a nearby
electric grid interconnection point with options to evaluate multiple
grid interconnection locations; and (6) appurtenant facilities. The
proposed project would have an annual generation of 24,000 megawatt-
hours.
    Applicant Contact: Dennis Ryan, ECOsponsible, LLC, P.O. Box 114,
West Falls, NY 14170; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Woohee Choi; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications using the Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief
comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the
eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You
must include your name and contact information at the end of your
comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper copy to:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should include
docket number P-14988-000.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the
Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-14988) in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: June 13, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-13827 Filed 6-27-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 28, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 45145]
[FR Doc No: 2019-18507]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER19-2671-000]

Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing
Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization: SR Arlington
II, LLC

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced SR Arlington
II, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is September 11, 2019.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 22, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-18507 Filed 8-27-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21497-21501]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08349]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-5468; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-021-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 series
airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of paint
deterioration on the surface of the main landing gear (MLG) and the
early onset of corrosion in the trunnion bore of the MLG outer
cylinder. This proposed AD would require identifying affected parts,
repetitive external surface detailed inspection for damage of affected
parts, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary.
For certain airplanes, this AD also would require a detailed inspection
and bushing replacement of the trunnion bore, and related investigative
and corrective action if necessary. We are proposing this AD to prevent
stress corrosion cracking of the external surfaces of the MLG, which
could result in a fracture of the MLG and consequent MLG collapse.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 27, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box
3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It
is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-5468.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
5468; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Pohl, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-
6450; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-5468;
Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-021-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We received reports from several operators of paint deterioration
on the surface of the MLG and early onset of corrosion in the trunnion
bore of the MLG outer cylinder. A maintenance repair and overhaul (MRO)
facility observed forward trunnion bore corrosion on a right MLG while
installing new bushings. Another MRO disclosed that between 2007 and
2010, the primer used on the landing gear components did not comply
with Boeing Material Specification (BMS) 10-79. Also, paint chip and
trunnion bore analysis showed that unqualified primer was used; primer
application was up to 5 times too thick while enamel was too thin;
there was early deterioration of the fillet seal at the trunnion bore;
and the trunnion bushing installation process, which may have damaged
the finish on the bore, did not follow the standard overhaul practices
manual. This condition, if not corrected, could result in a fracture of
the MLG and consequent MLG collapse.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-1486,
dated November 6, 2014, as revised by Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-32-1486, Revision 1, dated April 1, 2015. The service
information describes procedures for identifying affected parts,
repetitive external surface detailed inspection for damage of affected
parts, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary.
For certain airplanes, this AD also would require a detailed inspection
and bushing replacement of the trunnion bore, and related investigative
and corrective action if necessary. The service information also
describes procedures for certain airplanes that include a detailed
inspection of the trunnion bore, and corrective actions. This service
information is reasonably available because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of these same type
designs.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously, except as discussed
under ``Differences Between this Proposed AD and the Service
Information.''
    The phrase ``corrective actions'' is used in this proposed AD.
``Corrective actions'' correct or address any condition found.
Corrective actions in an AD could include, for example, repairs.
    The phrase ``related investigative actions'' is used in this
proposed AD. ``Related investigative actions'' are follow-on actions
that (1) are related to the primary action, and (2) further investigate
the nature of any condition found. Related investigative actions in an
AD could include, for example, inspections.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information

    Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-1486, dated
November 6, 2014, as revised by Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-32-1486, Revision 1, dated April 1, 2015, specifies to
contact the manufacturer for instructions on how to repair certain
conditions, but this proposed AD would require repairing those
conditions in one of the following ways:
     In accordance with a method that we approve; or
     Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) whom we have
authorized to make those findings.
    While the effectivity of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737-32-1486, dated November 6, 2014, as revised by Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-1486, Revision 1, dated April 1,
2015, is limited to those airplanes that are listed, the applicability
of this AD affects all The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -
800, and -900 series airplanes.

Clarification of Affected MLGs

    An MLG overhauled by SAFRAN Messier-Bugatti-Dowty outside of the
Boeing Exchange program from June 1, 2009, to July 31, 2013, would also
be affected by this proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 33 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
             Action                   Labor cost          Parts cost       Cost per  product       operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
External surface detailed         Up to 16 work-      $0................  $1,360 per          Up to $44,880 per
 Inspection.                       hours x $85 per                         inspection cycle.   inspection cycle.
                                   hour = $1,360 per
                                   inspection cycle.
Outer Cylinder assembly trunnion  70 work-hours x     Negligible........  $5,950............  $196,350.
 bore detailed inspection and      $85 per hour =
 bushing replacement (G1-2,        $5,950.
 configuration 1).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements
that would be required based on the results of the proposed inspection.
We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need
this replacement.

                           On-Condition Costs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Cost per
             Action                    Labor cost            product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outer cylinder assembly          28 work-hours x $85             $2,380
 replacement (if required as a    per hour = $2,380.
 result of the outer cylinder
 trunnion bore detailed
 inspection).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for certain on-condition actions (MLG external surface
repair, MLG component replacement, outer cylinder repair, and MLG
replacement) specified in this proposed AD.
    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this proposed
AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
    The previous info is based on known airplanes. However, the MLG may
have been overhauled outside of the Boeing Exchange Program as
specified in the Clarification of Affected MLGs section of this
proposed AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2016-5468; Directorate Identifier
2015-NM-021-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by May 27, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -
700C, -800, and -900 series airplanes, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32, Landing
Gear.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of paint deterioration on the
surface of the main

landing gear (MLG) and early onset of corrosion in the trunnion bore
of the MLG outer cylinder. We are issuing this AD to prevent stress
corrosion cracking of the external surfaces of the MLG, which could
result in a fracture of the MLG and consequent MLG collapse.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Inspection for Affected Part/Serial Numbers

    At the applicable time specified in table 1 of paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-
1486, dated November 6, 2014, as revised by Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-32-1486, Revision 1, dated April 1, 2015,
except as required by paragraph (k)(1) of this AD: Do the actions
specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD in order to
identify affected parts.
    (1) Inspect the MLG to determine if it has any component
installation or side strut assembly having a part number and serial
number listed in Appendix D of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-32-1486, dated November 6, 2014, as revised by Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-1486, Revision 1, dated
April 1, 2015; except that the ``Variable Number'' column of
Appendix D is to be disregarded in determining affected part and
serial numbers. A MLG that has any MLG component installation or
side strut assembly having a part number and serial number listed in
Appendix D of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-1486,
dated November 6, 2014, as revised by Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-32-1486, Revision 1, dated April 1, 2015, is an
affected part. A review of airplane maintenance records is
acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the part number and serial
number of the MLG component installation and side strut assembly can
be conclusively identified from that review.
    (2) Do a records review to determine if the MLG has been
overhauled by SAFRAN Messier-Bugatti-Dowty outside of the Boeing
Exchange program from June 1, 2009 to July 31, 2013. If the MLG has
been overhauled by SAFRAN Messier-Bugatti-Dowty outside of the
Boeing Exchange program from June 1, 2009 to July 31, 2013, that MLG
is an affected part. If the records review cannot conclusively
determine that an overhauled MLG was overhauled by an MRO other than
SAFRAN Messier-Bugatti-Dowty, or if the records review cannot
conclusively determine that an MLG overhauled by SAFRAN Messier-
Bugatti-Dowty was part of the Boeing Exchange program from June 1,
2009 to July 31, 2013; that MLG is an affected part.

(h) Requirements for Affected Parts

    If any affected part is identified during the inspection or
records review required by paragraph (g) of this AD: At the
applicable time specified in table 3 of paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-
1486, dated November 6, 2014, as revised by Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-32-1486, Revision 1, dated April 1, 2015,
except as required by paragraph (k)(1) of this AD: Do detailed
inspections of the external surfaces of the MLG, and do all
applicable related investigative and corrective actions, in
accordance with Parts 1, 3, and 4 of the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-1486, dated
November 6, 2014, as revised by Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-32-1486, Revision 1, dated April 1, 2015, except as
required by paragraph (k)(2) of this AD. Repeat the inspections
thereafter at the applicable time specified in table 3 of paragraph
1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737-32-1486, dated November 6, 2014, as revised by Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-1486, Revision 1, dated April 1,
2015. All applicable related investigative and corrective actions
must be done before further flight.

(i) Additional Actions for Groups 1 and 2, Configuration 1

    For airplanes that are identified as Groups 1 and 2,
Configuration 1, in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-
32-1486, dated November 6, 2014, as revised by Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-1486, Revision 1, dated April 1,
2015, and that have an affected part identified during the
inspection or records review required by paragraph (g) of this AD:
At the applicable time specified in table 4 of Paragraph 1.E,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-
1486, dated November 6, 2014, as revised by Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-32-1486, Revision 1, dated April 1, 2015,
except as required by paragraph (k)(1) of this AD, do a detailed
inspection and bushing replacement of the MLG trunnion bore, and do
all applicable related investigative and corrective actions, in
accordance with Parts 2, 5, and 6 of the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-1486, dated
November 6, 2014, as revised by Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-32-1486, Revision 1, dated April 1, 2015, except as
required by paragraph (k)(2) of this AD.

(j) Terminating Action

    (1) MLG replacement in accordance with Part 8 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-32-1486, dated November 6, 2014, as revised by Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-1486, Revision 1, dated
April 1, 2015, terminates the requirements of paragraphs (g), (h),
and (i) of this AD for that MLG only.
    (2) MLG component replacement in accordance with Part 4 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-32-1486, dated November 6, 2014, as revised by Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-1486, Revision 1, dated
April 1, 2015, terminates the requirements of paragraph (h) of this
AD for that component only.
    (3) MLG outer cylinder replacement in accordance with Part 7 of
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-32-1486, dated November 6, 2014, as revised by Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-1486, Revision 1, dated
April 1, 2015, terminates the requirements of paragraph (i) of this
AD for that component only.

(k) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications

    (1) Where paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-1486, dated November 6, 2014, as
revised by Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-1486,
Revision 1, dated April 1, 2015, specifies a compliance time ``after
the original issue date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires
compliance within the specified compliance time after the effective
date of this AD.
    (2) Although Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-
1486, dated November 6, 2014, as revised by Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-32-1486, Revision 1, dated April 1, 2015,
specifies to contact Boeing for repair instructions, and specifies
that action as ``RC'' (Required for Compliance), this AD requires
repair before further flight using a method approved in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (m) of this AD.

(l) Parts Installation Prohibition

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install the
following on any airplane identified in paragraph (c) of this AD,
unless the MLG has been overhauled using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (m) of this
AD:
    (1) An MLG having a part number and serial number identified in
Appendix D to Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-32-1486,
dated November 6, 2014, as revised by Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-32-1486, Revision 1, dated April 1, 2015.
    (2) An MLG that was overhauled from June 1, 2009, to July 31,
2013, by SAFRAN Messier-Bugatti-Dowty.

(m) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (n)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing

Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA)
that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those
findings. To be approved, the repair method, modification deviation,
or alteration deviation must meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) Except as required by paragraph (k)(2) of this AD: For
service information that contains steps that are labeled as RC, the
provisions of paragraphs (m)(4)(i) and (m)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
    (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. An AMOC is required for any deviations to RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures.
    (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.

(n) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Alan Pohl,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle ACO,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 31, 2016.
Victor Wicklund,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-08349 Filed 4-11-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: July 5, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 128)]
[Notices]
[Page 39091-39092]
[DOCID:fr05jy11-64]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2010-0777, FRL-9429-5]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Source Compliance and State
Action Reporting (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information
Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an
existing approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below,
describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated
burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before August 4,
2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OECA-
2010-0777, to (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA
Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB by mail to:
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Betsy Metcalf, Enforcement Targeting &
Data Division, Office of Compliance, 2222A, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On January 18, 2011 (76 FR 2904), EPA sought comments on this
ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received two (2) comments during
the comment period, which are addressed in the ICR. Any additional
comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days
of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OECA-2010-0777, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Enforcement and
Compliance Docket and Information Center (ECDIC) in the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the ECDIC is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as EPA
receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, confidential business information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For
further information about the electronic docket, go to http://
www.regulations.gov.
    Title: Source Compliance and State Action Reporting (Renewal).
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 0107.10, OMB Control No. 2060-0096.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on July 31, 2011. Under
OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the
collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.

    Abstract: Source Compliance and State Action Reporting is an
activity whereby State, District, Local, and Commonwealth governments
(hereafter referred to as either ``states/locals'' or ``state and local
agencies'') make air compliance and enforcement information available
to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) on a
cyclic basis via input to the Air Facility System (AFS). The
information provided to EPA includes compliance activities and
determinations, and enforcement activities. EPA uses this information
to assess progress toward meeting emission requirements developed under
the authority of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) to protect and
maintain the atmospheric environment and the public health. The EPA and
many of the state and local agencies access the data in AFS to assist
them in the management of their air pollution control programs. This
renewal information collection request (ICR) affects oversight of
approximately 39,005 stationary sources by 99 state and local agencies
and the Federal EPA. On average, the burden imposed by this collection
amounts to approximately one-tenth of a full-time equivalent employee
for each small state and local agency, one-fourth of a full-time
equivalent employee for each medium sized state and local agency and
one and one-tenth of a full-time equivalent employee for each large
sized state and local agency for national reporting of compliance and
enforcement related data under all of the applicable Clean Air Act
programs.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 92
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: State and Local Agencies.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 99.
    Frequency of Response: Every 60 days.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 54,384.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $2,843,187 in labor costs. There are
no capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of 18,689 hours in
the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of
Approved ICR Burdens. This decrease is due to a continuing decrease in
the number of major sources in the reportable universe and a reported
decrease of time and resources available for use in data management by
small and medium sized agencies.

    Dated: June 28, 2011.
Joseph A. Sierra,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2011-16728 Filed 7-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 115 (Friday, June 14, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35747-35749]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14040]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-1329; Directorate Identifier 2012-NE-46-AD;
Amendment 39-17479; AD 2013-12-02]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Engine Alliance Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Engine Alliance GP7270 and GP7277 turbofan engines. This AD was
prompted by damage to the high-pressure compressor (HPC) stage 7-9
spool caused by failure of the baffle plate feature on affected HPC
stage 6 disks. This AD requires initial and repetitive borescope
inspections of the baffle plate feature and removal from service of the
HPC stage 6 disk if the plate is missing material. This AD also
requires mandatory removal from service of these HPC stage 6 disks at
the next HPC module exposure. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure
of the HPC stage 7-9 spool, uncontained engine failure, and damage to
the airplane.

DATES: This AD is effective July 19, 2013.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martin Adler, Aerospace Engineer,

Engine & Propeller Directorate, FAA, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM published in the Federal Register on February 7, 2013 (78 FR
9003). That NPRM proposed to require initial and repetitive borescope
inspections of the HPC stage 6 disk baffle plate feature and removal
from service of any HPC stage 6 disk, part number (P/N) 382-100-505-0,
before further flight if the feature is missing any material. That NPRM
also proposed to require mandatory removal from service of these HPC
stage 6 disks at the next HPC module exposure, but no later than
accumulating 6,800 cycles-since-new on the disk.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Allow Continue-In-Service Limits for the Baffle Plate
Feature

    Engine Alliance and Korean Airlines requested that we allow
continue-in-service limits for the baffle plate feature. Engine
Alliance stated that they have performed extensive analysis showing
that the risk in doing so, is minimal. Both commenters point out the
potential inconveniences to the flying public, and the potential
economical and logistical impacts on air carriers.
    We agree. We changed paragraph (f)(4) of the AD to state to remove
the HPC stage 6 disk within 50 additional cycles-in-service, if the
baffle plate feature is found cracked or missing material.

Request To Remove References to Damage Causing Cracks to the HPC 7-9
Spool

    Engine Alliance requested that we remove the reference to damage
causing cracks to the HPC 7-9 spool, in the Discussion paragraph of the
NPRM (78 FR 9003, February 7, 2013). Engine Alliance stated that there
has been no cracking of the spools related to the baffle plate feature
problem, to-date, but there is potential for cracking, and they
suggested that we state there is potential for cracking.
    We partially agree. We agree that there has been no cracking yet.
We do not agree with stating there is potential for cracking, because
we wouldn't be issuing an AD if cracking couldn't happen. We did not
change the AD.

Request To Include Engine Alliance Service Bulletins (SBs)

    Engine Alliance and Korean Airlines requested that we include
Engine Alliance SBs No.s EAGP7-72-237 and EAGP7-72-240 as terminating
action for this AD. The SBs introduce the new design of the HPC stage 6
disk either by repair or a new part, which eliminates the unsafe
condition.
    We partially agree. We agree that a repaired HPC stage 6 disk
should be allowed to be installed as a terminating action for the AD,
as well as installing the new P/N HPC stage 6 disk. We changed
paragraph (g) in the AD from ``At next HPC module exposure, but not to
exceed 6,800 CSN on the HPC stage 6 disk, remove the HPC stage 6 disk,
P/N 382-100-505-0, from service'' to allow use of the repaired part.
Paragraph (g) of this AD now reads: ``At next HPC module exposure, but
not to exceed 6,800 CSN on the HPC stage 6 disk, remove the HPC stage 6
disk, P/N 382-100-505-0, from the engine.'' We do not agree with
stipulating the SBs as terminating actions because we do not want to
prevent future configurations from being terminating action. However,
we listed those SBs under Related Information in the AD.

Request To Define When Undamaged Part Replacement Is Required

    Engine Alliance requested that we define when undamaged part
replacement is required, from module level to rotor assembly exposure.
They stated that disk removal involves a full teardown of the
compressor module, which can only be performed at specialized repair
facilities. There is maintenance that can be performed at other
facilities not qualified for a full teardown, which could involve
removal and installation of a complete compressor module.
    We agree. We changed paragraph (i) in the AD from: ``For the
purpose of this AD, HPC module exposure is defined as separation of the
flanges between the compressor case and the combustion diffuser case''
to: ``For the purpose of this AD, HPC module exposure is defined as
disassembly of the compressor to where the HPC rotor assembly is
removed and accessible.''

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously. We have determined that
these minor changes:
     [Agr]re consistent with the intent that was proposed in
the NPRM (78 FR 9003, February 7, 2013) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 9003, February 7, 2013).
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect no engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry, and the cost to U.S. operators to be $0.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction, and

    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2013-12-02 Engine Alliance: Amendment 39-17479; Docket No. FAA-2012-
1329; Directorate Identifier 2012-NE-46-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective July 19, 2013.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Engine Alliance GP7270 and GP7277 turbofan
engines with a high-pressure compressor (HPC) stage 6 disk, part
number (P/N) 382-100-505-0, installed.

(d) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by damage to the HPC stage 7-9 spool caused
by failure of the baffle plate feature on affected HPC stage 6
disks. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the HPC stage 7-
9 spool, uncontained engine failure, and damage to the airplane.

(e) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(f) Borescope Inspections

    (1) For HPC stage 6 disks with fewer than 1,000 cycles- since-
new (CSN) on the effective date of this AD, initially borescope
inspect the baffle plate feature on the disk (360 degrees) before
accumulating 1,500 CSN.
    (2) For HPC stage 6 disks with 1,000 CSN or more on the
effective date of this AD, initially borescope inspect the baffle
plate feature on the disk (360 degrees) within the next 500 cycles-
in-service (CIS).
    (3) Thereafter, repetitively borescope inspect the baffle plate
feature on the disk (360 degrees) within every 500 CIS.
    (4) Remove the HPC stage 6 disk within 50 additional CIS, if the
baffle plate feature is found cracked or missing material.

(g) Mandatory Removal From Service of Affected HPC Stage 6 Disks

    At next HPC module exposure, but not to exceed 6,800 CSN on the
HPC stage 6 disk, remove the HPC stage 6 disk, P/N 382-100-505-0,
from the engine.

(h) Installation Prohibition

    After the effective date of this AD, do not install any HPC
stage 6 disk, P/N 382-100-505-0, into any HPC module.

(i) Definition

    For the purpose of this AD, HPC module exposure is defined as
disassembly of the compressor to where the HPC rotor assembly is
removed and accessible.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    The Manager, Engine Certification Office, may approve AMOCs for
this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request.

(k) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Martin Adler,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine & Propeller Directorate, FAA, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Engine Alliance Service Bulletin Nos. EAGP7-72-236, EAGP7-
72-237, and EAGP7-72-240, pertain to the subject of this AD.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Engine Alliance, 411 Silver Lane, East Hartford, CT 06118, phone:
800-565-0140; Web site: https://www.engineallianceportal.com. You
may view this service information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
781-238-7125.

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    None.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on June 7, 2013.
Robert J. Ganley,
Acting Assistant Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-14040 Filed 6-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 148 (Thursday, August 5, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 42957]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16673]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-92530]

Notice of Intention To Cancel Registration of Certain Municipal
Advisors Pursuant to Section 15b(c)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934

July 30, 2021.
    Notice is given that the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') intends to issue an order or orders, pursuant to
Section 15B(c)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),
cancelling the registrations of the municipal advisors whose names
appear in the attached Appendix (hereinafter referred to as the
``registrants'').
    Section 15B(c)(3) of the Act provides, in pertinent part, that if
the Commission finds that any municipal advisor registered under
Section 15B is no longer in existence or has ceased to do business as a
municipal advisor, the Commission, by order, shall cancel the
registration of such municipal advisor.
    The Commission finds that each registrant listed in the attached
Appendix:

    (i) has not filed any municipal advisor form submissions with
the Commission through the Commission's Electronic Data Gathering
and Retrieval (``EDGAR'') system since January 1, 2019 (including
but not limited to the annual amendments (form MA-A) required by 17
CFR 240.15Ba1-5(a)(1)); and
    (ii) based on information available from the Municipal
Securities Rulemaking Board (the ``MSRB''), (a) is not registered as
a municipal advisor with the MSRB under MSRB Rule A-12(a) and/or (b)
does not have an associated person who is qualified as a municipal
advisor representative under MSRB Rule G-3(d) and for whom there is
a Form MA-I required by 17 CFR 240.15Ba1-2(b) available on EDGAR,
and/or (c) has not, since January 1, 2019, filed with the MSRB any
Form A-12 annual affirmation as required by MSRB Rule A-12(k).

    Accordingly, the Commission finds that each of the registrants
listed in the attached Appendix either is no longer in existence or has
ceased to do business as a municipal advisor.
    Notice is also given that any interested person may, by August 30,
2021, at 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time, submit to the Commission in writing a
request for a hearing on the cancellation of the registration of any
registrant listed in the attached Appendix, accompanied by a statement
as to the nature of such person's interest, the reason for such
request, and the issues, if any, of fact or law proposed to be
controverted, and such person may request to be notified if the
Commission should order a hearing thereon. Any such communication
should be addressed to the Commission's Secretary at the address below.
    At any time after August 30, 2021, the Commission may issue an
order or orders cancelling the registrations of any or all of the
registrants listed in the attached Appendix, upon the basis of the
information stated above, unless an order or orders for a hearing on
the cancellation shall be issued upon request or upon the Commission's
own motion. Persons who requested a hearing, or to be advised as to
whether a hearing is ordered, will receive any notices and orders
issued in this matter, including the date of the hearing (if ordered)
and any postponements thereof. Any registrant whose registration is
cancelled under delegated authority may appeal that decision directly
to the Commission in accordance with Rules 430 and 431 of the
Commission's rules of practice (17 CFR 201.430 and 431).

ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ernesto Lanza, Senior Counsel to the
Director, Office of Municipal Securities, 100 F Street NE, Washington,
DC 20549, or at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    For the Commission, by the Office of Municipal Securities,
pursuant to delegated authority.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 17 CFR 200.30-3a(a)(1)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.

Appendix

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Registrant name                        SEC ID No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
All American Municipal Advisors LLC.....................       867-02070
ARGENT TRUST Co.........................................       867-01984
Black Holocaust Inc., d/b/a Black holocaust Mutual......       867-02224
Brock Steven Kyle d/b/a Thurber Brock & Associates......       867-01746
Burke Richard Stephen...................................       867-02031
C.A. WHITTAKER & ASSOCIATES, LLC, d/b/a Whittaker &            867-01736
 Company, PLLC..........................................
D B & Co................................................       867-02211
DAMON ROCQUE SECURITIES CORP\/BD........................       867-01305
Financing Ideas Inc.....................................       867-01649
First Midwest Municipal Lease Corp., d/b/a Midwest             867-02287
 Healthcare Capital (MHC)...............................
Friedman, Luzzatto & Co.................................       867-00536
Garffer Jerome L., d/b/a G Capital Investments..........       867-01885
Grant Financial Advisors, LLC...........................       867-01818
IFS Planning, INC.......................................       867-02298
Ironwood Advisors.......................................       867-01112
Laube Capital Advisors, LLC.............................       867-02023
Muni Funding Solutions LLC..............................       867-02292
Ross Infrastructure Development LLC.....................       867-02344
Shift 4 Consulting, L.L.C...............................       867-01960
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2021-16673 Filed 8-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 41 (Friday, March 1, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6966-6967]
[FR Doc No: 2019-03613]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0987; Airspace Docket No. 18-ASO-19]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Auburn, AL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends Class E airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface at Auburn University Regional Airport, Auburn,
AL, to accommodate new area navigation (RNAV) global positioning system
(GPS) standard instrument approach procedures serving this airport.
Also, this action recognizes the airport's name change and updates the
airport's geographic coordinates. Controlled airspace is necessary for
the safety and management of instrument flight rules (IFR) operations
at this airport.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, April 25, 2019. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under Title 1
Code of Federal Regulations part 51, subject to the annual revision of
FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11C at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends Class E airspace at Auburn University Regional Airport,
Auburn, AL, to support IFR operations at this airport.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (83 FR 63447, December 10, 2018) for Docket No. FAA-2018-0987
to amend Class E airspace at Auburn University Regional Airport,
Auburn, AL, to support IFR operations at this airport.
    Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005, of
FAA Order 7400.11C dated August 13, 2018, and effective September 15,
2018, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1. The Class
E airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 13, 2018, and effective September 15,
2018. FAA Order 7400.11C is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11C lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 amends Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface within an 6.9-mile radius (increased from a 6.5-mile
radius) and adds an extension of 11-miles southwest of Auburn
University Regional Airport, Auburn, AL, providing the controlled
airspace required to support the new RNAV (GPS) standard instrument
approach procedures for IFR operations at Auburn University Regional
Airport. Also, this action recognizes the airport's name change to
Auburn University Regional Airport, (from Auburn-Opelika Robert G.
Pitts Airport), and the geographic coordinates of the airport are
amended to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified
that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 13, 2018, and effective September 15, 2018, is
amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASO AL E5 Auburn, AL [Amended]

Auburn University Regional Airport, AL
    (Lat. 32[deg]36'54'' N, long. 85[deg]26'02'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.9-mile radius of Auburn University Regional Airport, and
within 1.6-miles each side of the 237[deg] bearing from the airport,
extending from the 6.9-mile radius to 11 miles southwest of the
airport.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on February 20, 2019.
Geoff Lelliott,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2019-03613 Filed 2-28-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P