[Federal Register: May 12, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 91)]
[Notices]
[Page 26751-26754]
[DOCID:fr12my10-57]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0865; FRL-9150-6]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Internet Survey Research for Improving Fuel Economy
Label Design and Content; EPA ICR No. 2390.01, OMB Control No. 2060-NEW

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that EPA is planning to
submit a request for a new Information Collection Request (ICR) to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Before submitting the ICR to OMB
for review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on specific aspects
of the proposed information collection as described below.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 11, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2009-0865 by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center
(EPA/DC), Air and Radiation Docket, Mail Code 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2009-0865.
     Hand Delivery: Docket Center, (EPA/DC) EPA West, Room
B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC, Attention Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0865. Such deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be
made for deliveries of boxed information. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2009-0865. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roberts French, Compliance and
Innovative Strategies Division, Office of Transportation and Air
Quality, Environmental Protection Agency, 2000 Traverwood Dr., Ann
Arbor, MI 48105; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number: (734)
214-4869; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

How can I access the Docket and/or submit comments?

    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0865, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Air and
Radiation Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/
DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC.
The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The

telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the OAR Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use http://www.regulations.gov to obtain a copy of the draft
collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once
in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified in this document.

What information is EPA particularly interested in?

    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA specifically
solicits comments and information to enable it to:
    (i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    (ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden
of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
    (iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and
    (iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.

What should I consider when I prepare my comments for EPA?

    You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
    1. Explain your views as clearly as possible and provide specific
examples.
    2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
    3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
    4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
    5. Offer alternative ways to improve the collection activity.
    6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
    7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.

What information collection activity or ICR does this apply to?

    Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0865.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
randomly selected U.S. citizens. Some screening may be done to ensure
that the respondents may have some familiarity with fuel economy and
fuel economy labels. For example, respondents could be randomly
selected from records of people who have recently purchased a vehicle.
Details regarding the specific sampling method concepts are discussed
below in section I.B.1.
    Title: Focus Group and Internet Survey Research for Improving Fuel
Economy Label Design and Content.
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR No. 2390.01, OMB Control No. 2060-NEW.
    ICR Status: This ICR is for a new information collection activity.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.

I. Description of Information Collection Activities

A. Background

    EPA is responsible under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of
1975 (EPCA) for developing the fuel economy labels that are posted on
window stickers of all new light duty cars and trucks sold in the U.S.
and, beginning with the 2011 model year, on all new medium-duty
passenger vehicles (a category that includes large sport-utility
vehicles and passenger vans).
    In 2006, EPA updated how the city and highway fuel economy values
are calculated to better reflect typical real-world driving patterns
and provide more realistic fuel economy estimates. Since then, a
projected increase in market penetration of advanced technology
vehicles, in particular plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and
electric vehicles (EVs), will require new label metrics to effectively
communicate information to consumers. EPA projects an increase in the
near future in the market penetration of advanced technology vehicles
like PHEVs and EVs. These vehicles run on electricity obtained from the
grid in addition to gasoline, and therefore their fuel consumption
cannot be precisely conveyed by the current miles-per-gallon (MPG)
metric.
    As part of its ongoing responsibilities under EPCA, EPA sought
public comments in the ``Proposed Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty
Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel
Economy Standards'' (September 28, 2009; 74 FR 49454, at 49576) on
issues surrounding consumer vehicle labeling of conventional gasoline
vehicles in general and labeling of advanced technology vehicles in
particular. At that time, EPA announced plans to initiate a separate
rulemaking to explore in detail the information displayed on the
current fuel economy label and requested comments on providing relevant
information to consumers, including adding information regarding fuel
economic such as consumption in fuel use. EPA also requested comments
on approaches to providing information about a vehicle's greenhouse gas
emissions.
    Recently, the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA)
introduced additional new labeling requirements that are to be
implemented by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA). In the same proposed rulemaking as EPA (September 28, 2009; 74
FR 49454, at 49739), NHTSA also requested comments on how it should
undertake its new labeling responsibilities.
    To maximize regulatory efficiency, minimize the burden on
manufacturers and provide the best information possible to American
consumers, EPA and NHTSA are conducting a joint rulemaking to redesign
the current fuel economy label. The primary purposes of this regulatory
action are: (1) To design new fuel economy labels that are consistent
with the EISA requirements in 40 U.S.C. 32908(g), (2) to develop labels
that address the unique nature of advanced technology vehicles that use
electricity and gasoline, and (3) to propose adding some new
information and changing the overall look of all fuel economy labels
for all conventional vehicles (while continuing to meet the statutory
requirements in EPCA).
    These purposes all fall under an overarching goal of better
informing consumers about the fuel consumption, fuel costs, and
environmental impacts associated with new vehicles at both the point of
purchase and while conducting pre-purchase research. Specifically, the
re-designed labels will need to meet the requirements defined by 49
U.S.C.

32908(b) and 32908(g) as detailed below.
    EPA's statutory labeling requirements are found in 49 U.S.C.
32908(b) and require that the label contain:
     The fuel economy of the automobile.
     The estimated annual fuel cost of operating the
automobile.
     The range of fuel economy of comparable automobiles of all
manufacturers.
     A statement that a booklet is available from the dealer to
assist in making a comparison of fuel economy of other automobiles
manufactured by all manufacturers in that model year.
     The amount of the automobile fuel efficiency tax imposed
on the sale of the automobile under section 4064 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 4064).
     Other related information required or authorized by the
EPA Administrator NHTSA's statutory labeling requirements are found in
49 U.S.C. 32908(g) and additionally require:
     Information on a vehicle's performance over its useful
life with respect to:
     Fuel economy.
     Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
     Other emissions.
     The creation of a rating system for consumers to easily
compare, at the point of purchase, vehicles' fuel economy, GHG
emissions, and other emissions, including designations of the vehicles
with:
     Lowest GHG emissions over the useful life of the vehicles.
     Highest fuel economy.
    To help the agencies develop a joint label that meets the statutory
requirements as well as the policy objectives outlined above, EPA is
conducting voluntary focus groups and an Internet survey over the
course of developing the rulemaking to solicit information from a
diverse group of consumers regarding what information displayed on the
fuel economy label will best serve the intended purpose of providing
consumers with useful and meaningful information about the fuel
efficiency of the vehicles they are considering purchasing.\1\ EPA is
in the process of conducting three ``phases'' of focus groups. Each
phase has a different concentration, enabling us to test consumer
comprehension of and reaction to different fuel economy, cost, and
environmental information and label displays. The result of these focus
groups, when combined, will increase EPA and NHTSA's understanding of
which potential label metrics, information and overall label displays
present the required information in a more understandable and
compelling manner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See 74 FR 63149, December 2, 2009, for EPA's initial Notice
for Proposed Collection and Comment Request regarding the ICR for
these activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The first focus group (conducted under ICR Number 2343.01) aimed to
test consumer understanding and use of the current fuel economy label
and the importance of various information elements on today's label.
This phase also assessed consumer reactions to the introduction of new
information on future labels for conventionally fueled vehicles.
Specifically, consumers were asked to consider various presentations of
fuel economy and fuel consumption, fuel cost, environmental
performance, and other factors. The second phase (conducted under ICR
Number 2343.02) focused on determining what information is most
important and helpful on labels for advanced technology vehicles and
how that information is best presented. Specifically, the second focus
group tested what metrics (fuel economy and fuel consumption, fuel
cost, environmental performance, etc.) are most appropriate for
electric vehicles, extended-range electric vehicles, and plug-in hybrid
electric vehicles and how the labels can best inform consumers of the
fact that vehicle fuel consumption and efficiency depends significantly
on how the vehicles are used. The third phase of focus group research,
currently in the planning stages, will ask consumers to assist in
developing the most effective and compelling presentation for the
overall label, ensuring that all options tested include elements
meeting all EPCA and EISA statutory requirements. This notice requests
comment on the Internet survey as described in section I.B. below.
    The upcoming joint EPA/NHTSA notice of proposed rulemaking will
propose a collection of label designs for consideration and public
comment. These designs will be based largely on the focus group
research. Following conclusion of the focus group research, EPA will
conduct an Internet-based survey to test the label designs developed
and tested in the focus groups with a broader audience. This notice
discusses the potential survey sampling methods, survey question types,
and broad content. As described below, EPA is seeking comments on the
outlined approach for the Internet survey.

B. Internet Survey

    The goals of the Internet survey are to examine how understandable
the new label designs are, and whether the new labels will improve
consumers' abilities to select more fuel-efficient vehicles. It will
test these questions for both conventional and advanced technology
vehicles.
1. Sampling Method
    Based on OMB guidance, this study plans to use two convenience
samples: Self-selected U.S. new vehicle purchasers and people who have
expressed an intention to purchase a new vehicle by requesting a price
quote from a dealer. Because the study is not a probability-based
sample, it may not yield estimates representative of the target
population, new vehicle buyers. However, even if the results are not
representative of the population, the agencies believe that the study
design will provide quantitative estimates of differences in consumer
responses between various test conditions, and it may be possible to
adjust results to reflect differences between the respondents and the
target population.
    These samples will be divided into a number of separate groups (the
number of groups depends on the number of label designs being tested).
One version of the online survey will be developed for each group,
identical in every way except that each of the groups will see only one
of the label designs to be tested. To estimate the burden of this
information collection we are assuming approximately 500 respondents
for each label being tested, and a maximum of 12 different label
designs (consisting of 3 overall labels with 4 unique associated labels
to address (1) gasoline, (2) electric, (3) plug-in hybrid, and (3)
extend-range plug-in hybrid vehicle needs), thus resulting in a
potential maximum of 6,000 respondents.
    To test respondents' understanding of the labels, each respondent
will be shown a series of paired labels. In each pair, all vehicle
characteristics will be held constant except the metric whose
understanding is being tested. For instance, the fuel economy of the
vehicles may differ, or one may be a conventional vehicle and one an
electric vehicle. The consumer will then be asked to identify which
vehicle has a better rating for the metric being tested. For instance,
the consumer would be asked which vehicle has better fuel economy, or
is less expensive to drive for a short distance. If one group scores
more highly in answering these questions correctly, then the label
associated with that group will appear to be more understandable than
the other labels.
    To test the influence of the labels, respondents will face similar
pairs of

labels for vehicles with all vehicle attributes constant except those
varied on the label. Instead of identifying the label that has the
better metric, the respondent would be asked which of these vehicles
she would prefer to buy. Comparisons will involve both conventional and
advanced technology vehicles. Respondents may be asked to decide based
not only on metrics, but also on price differences. For instance, a
respondent may see a vehicle with better fuel economy but a higher
purchase price. Because the survey will collect respondents'
demographic and commute-pattern information, it will be possible to
assess whether the commuter chose the vehicle that had lower costs for
her commute.
    For both these areas of study, the use of discrete-choice questions
is intended to reduce both the time burden on respondents and the
potential for respondents to manipulate results through strategic
responses to questions.
2. Methods To Maximize Response Rate and Deal With Non-Response
    We will use a number of approaches to increase the response rate
and minimize potential non-response bias. These methods will include:
     Optimizing the questionnaire length and question types to
strike the right balance between obtaining the necessary information
and ensuring the questionnaire is not burdensome. The target length for
the survey is 15 minutes.
     Interviewing five representative respondents using
cognitive interview techniques in order to identify areas of
misunderstanding, improved question wording, and areas of potential
length reduction.
     Pre-testing the survey with a sample of 50 representative
respondents to ensure that the survey programming functions as planned
and that the data is stored in a way that allows for in-depth data
analysis.
     Ensuring anonymity of respondent data by keeping any
identifying information in a separate file from survey question
responses. Appropriate procedures will be enacted to prevent
unauthorized access to respondent data and by preventing disclosure of
the responses of individual participants.
     Providing respondents with the primary investigator's
contact information so that they can ask any questions regarding the
questionnaire.
     Monitoring the response rate daily and address any issues
daily in order to increase the response rate and reduce burden to
respondents.

II. Burden Statement

    The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for the Internet
online survey collection of information is estimated to average 20
minutes per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency's estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here:
    Estimated total number of potential respondents: 6000.
    Frequency of response: One time.
    Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent: 1.
    Estimated total annual burden hours: 2080 hours.
    Estimated total annual burden costs: $61,152.

What is the next Step in the process for this ICR?

    EPA will consider the comments received. The final ICR package for
the online Internet survey will be submitted to OMB for review and
approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. If you have any questions about
this ICR or the approval process, please contact the technical person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Dated: May 6, 2010.
Margo T. Oge,
Director, Office of Transportation and Air Quality.
[FR Doc. 2010-11294 Filed 5-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 114 (Friday, June 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33941-33942]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13922]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4174-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2014-0003]

Arkansas; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Arkansas (FEMA-4174-DR), dated April 29,
2014, and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: April 29, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated April 29, 2014, the President issued a major

disaster declaration under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.
(the ``Stafford Act''), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State
of Arkansas resulting from severe storms, tornadoes, and flooding on
April 27, 2014, is of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a
major disaster declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the
``Stafford Act''). Therefore, I declare that such a major disaster
exists in the State of Arkansas.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Individual Assistance and
assistance for debris removal and emergency protective measures
(Categories A and B) under the Public Assistance program in the
designated areas, Hazard Mitigation throughout the State, and any
other forms of assistance under the Stafford Act that you deem
appropriate subject to completion of Preliminary Damage Assessments.
Direct Federal assistance is authorized.
    Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance be
supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Hazard Mitigation and Other Needs Assistance will be limited to 75
percent of the total eligible costs. Federal funds provided under
the Stafford Act for Public Assistance also will be limited to 75
percent of the total eligible costs, with the exception of projects
that meet the eligibility criteria for a higher Federal cost-sharing
percentage under the Public Assistance Alternative Procedures Pilot
Program for Debris Removal implemented pursuant to section 428 of
the Stafford Act.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The time period prescribed for the implementation of section
310(a), Priority to Certain Applications for Public Facility and Public
Housing Assistance, 42 U.S.C. 5153, shall be for a period not to exceed
six months after the date of this declaration.
    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under
Executive Order 12148, as amended, Timothy J. Scranton, of FEMA is
appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major
disaster.
    The following areas of the State of Arkansas have been designated
as adversely affected by this major disaster:

    Faulkner County for Individual Assistance.
    Faulkner County for debris removal and emergency protective
measures (Categories A and B), including direct federal assistance,
under the Public Assistance program.
    All counties within the State of Arkansas are eligible to apply
for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014-13922 Filed 6-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: July 12, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 132)]
[Notices]
[Page 39711]
[DOCID:fr12jy10-75]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, July
15, 2010 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting.
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday,
July 15, 2010 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
Consideration of amicus participation; and
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 8, 2010.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-17057 Filed 7-8-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P