[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 5, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72287-72290]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29400]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2012-0814; FRL-9757-8]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Florida;
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) Infrastructure Requirement for the 1997 and 2006
Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve in part, and disapprove in part,
the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions, submitted by the State
of Florida, through the Florida Department of Environmental Protection
(DEP) on April 18, 2008, and September 23, 2009. This proposal
addresses the Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements pertaining to prevention
of significant deterioration (PSD) for the 1997 annual and 2006 24-hour
fine particulate matter (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) infrastructure SIPs. The CAA requires that each state
adopt and submit a SIP for the implementation, maintenance, and
enforcement of each NAAQS promulgated by EPA, which is commonly
referred to as an ``infrastructure'' SIP. EPA is proposing to approve
in part, and disapprove in part the submission for Florida, that
relates to adequate provisions prohibiting emissions that interfere
with any other state's required measures to prevent significant
deterioration of its air quality. All other applicable infrastructure
requirements for the 1997 annual and 2006 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS associated with Florida are being addressed in separate
rulemakings.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before January 4, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2012-0814, by one of the following methods:
    1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    4. Mail: ``EPA-R04-OAR-2012-0814,'' Regulatory Development Section,

Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
    5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation.
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R04-OAR-
2012-0814. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or
email, information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected.
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically captured and included as part of
the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding
federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Lakeman, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is (404)
562-9043. Mr. Lakeman can be reached via electronic mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Table of Contents

I. Background
II. What are states required to address under sections 110(a)(2)(D)?
III. What is EPA's analysis of how Florida addressed element
(D)(i)(II) related to PSD?
IV. Proposed Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38652), EPA established an annual
PM2.5 NAAQS at 15.0 micrograms per cubic meter ([mu]g/m\3\)
based on a 3-year average of annual mean PM2.5
concentrations. At that time, EPA also established a 24-hour NAAQS of
65 [mu]g/m\3\. See 40 CFR 50.7. On October 17, 2006 (71 FR 61144), EPA
retained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS at 15.0 [mu]g/m\3\
based on a 3-year average of annual mean PM2.5
concentrations, and promulgated a new 24-hour NAAQS of 35 [mu]g/m\3\
based on a 3-year average of the 98th percentile of 24-hour
concentrations. By statute, SIPs meeting the requirements of sections
110(a)(1) and (2) are to be submitted by states within three years
after promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS. Sections 110(a)(1) and
(2) require states to address basic SIP requirements, including
emissions inventories, monitoring, and modeling to assure attainment
and maintenance of the NAAQS. States were required to submit such SIPs
to EPA no later than July 2000 for the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS, and no later than October 2009 for the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS.
    On March 4, 2004, Earthjustice submitted a notice of intent to sue
related to EPA's failure to issue findings of failure to submit related
to the ``infrastructure'' requirements for the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS. On March 10, 2005, EPA entered into a consent
decree with Earthjustice which required EPA, among other things, to
complete a Federal Register notice announcing EPA's determinations
pursuant to section 110(k)(1)(B) as to whether each state had made
complete submissions to meet the requirements of section 110(a)(2) for
the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS by October 5, 2008. In accordance with
the consent decree, EPA made completeness findings for each state based
upon what the Agency received from each state for the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS as of October 3, 2008.
    On October 22, 2008, EPA published a final rulemaking entitled
``Completeness Findings for Section 110(a) State Implementation Plans
Pertaining to the Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) NAAQS''
making a finding that each state had submitted or failed to submit a
complete SIP that provided the basic program elements of section
110(a)(2) necessary to implement the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. See
73 FR 62902. For those states that did receive findings, the findings
of failure to submit for all or a portion of a state's implementation
plan established a 24-month deadline for EPA to promulgate a Federal
Implementation Plan (FIP) to address the outstanding SIP elements
unless, prior to that time, the affected states submitted, and EPA
approved, the required SIPs.
    The findings that all or portions of a state's submission are
complete established a 12-month deadline for EPA to take action upon
the complete SIP elements in accordance with section 110(k). Florida's
infrastructure submission was received by EPA on April 18, 2008, for
the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS and on September 23, 2009, for
the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. Florida was among other states
that did not receive findings of failure to submit because they had
provided a complete submission to EPA to address the infrastructure
elements for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS by October 3, 2008.
    On July 6, 2011, WildEarth Guardians and Sierra Club filed an
amended complaint related to EPA's failure to take action on the SIP
submittal related to the ``infrastructure'' requirements for the 2006
24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. On October 20, 2011, EPA entered into a

consent decree with WildEarth Guardians and Sierra Club which required
EPA, among other things, to complete a Federal Register notice of the
Agency's final action either approving, disapproving, or approving in
part and disapproving in part the Florida 2006 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS Infrastructure SIP submittals addressing the applicable
requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(A)-(H), (J)-(M), except for section
110(a)(2)(C) nonattainment area requirements and section
110(a)(2)(D)(i) visibility requirements. The rulemaking proposed
through today's action is consistent with the terms of this consent
decree.
    Today's action is proposing to approve in part, and disapprove in
part, Florida's infrastructure submission for the 1997 annual and 2006
24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS addressing CAA section 110(a)(2)(D(i) as
it relates to adequate provisions prohibiting emissions that interfere
with any other state's required measures to prevent significant
deterioration of its air quality (referred to as ``prong 3''). EPA has
taken previous action on Florida's infrastructure submission for the
1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS for sections 110(a)(2)(A)-(F),
(H), (J)-(M), including other requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)
in separate actions from today's rulemaking.

II. What are states required to address under sections 110(a)(2)(D)?

    Section 110(a)(2)(D) has two components, 110(a)(2)(D)(i) and
110(a)(2)(D)(ii). Specifically, section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) has four
components that require SIPs to include provisions prohibiting any
source or other type of emissions activity in one state from: (1)
Contributing significantly to nonattainment maintenance of the NAAQS in
another state, and (2) interfering with maintenance of the NAAQS in
another state (collectively referred to as 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)); or
interfering with measures required to (3) prevent significant
deterioration of air quality in another state (prong 3), or (4) protect
visibility in another state (collectively referred to as
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)). Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) requires SIPs to include
provisions insuring compliance with sections 115 and 126 of the Act,
relating to interstate and international pollution abatement.
    In previous actions, EPA has already taken action to address
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) for Florida's infrastructure
submissions for the 1997 annual and 2006 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS. Today's proposed rulemaking relates only to requirements related
to prong 3 of 110(a)(2)(D)(i). More information on this requirement and
EPA's rationale for today's proposal approving in part, and
disapproving in part, this requirement for purposes of the 1997 annual
and 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS is provided below.

III. What is EPA's analysis of how Florida addressed element (D)(i)(II)
related to PSD?

    EPA's September 25, 2009, memorandum entitled ``Guidance on SIP
Elements Required Under Section 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 2006 24-Hour
Fine Particle (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality
Standards'' provided guidance on addressing the infrastructure
requirements required under sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) of the CAA
with respect to the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. The 2009
Guidance describes that a state's PSD permitting program is the primary
measure that such state must include in its SIP to prevent significant
deterioration of air quality in accordance with prong 3 of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i). As described below, EPA has preliminarily determined
that portions of Florida's infrastructure submissions are consistent
with the 2009 Guidance, when considered in conjunction with the State's
PSD program, and that a portion of the submissions is not.
    At present, there are four regulations that are required to be
adopted into the SIP to meet PSD-related infrastructure requirements.
See Sections 110(a)(2)(C), prong 3 of 110(a)(2)(D)(i), and 110(a)(2)(J)
of the CAA. These regulations are: (1) ``Final Rule To Implement the 8-
Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard--Phase 2; Final Rule''
(November 29, 2005, 70 FR 71612) (hereafter referred to as the ``Phase
II Rule''); (2) ``Implementation of the New Source Review Program for
Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Micrometers; Final Rule'' (May 16,
2008, 73 FR 28321) (hereafter referred to as the ``NSR PM2.5
Rule''); (3) ``Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V
Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule; Final Rule'' (June 3, 2010, 75 FR 31514)
(hereafter referred to as the ``GHG Tailoring Rule''); and, (4) ``Final
Rule on the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) for
Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Micrometers (PM2.5)--
Increments, Significant Impact Levels (SILs) and Significant monitoring
Concentration (SMC); Final Rule'' (October 20, 2010, 75 FR 64864)
(hereafter referred to as ``PM2.5 PSD Increment-SILs-SMC
Rule (only as it relates to PM2.5 Increments)''). Specific
details on the PSD requirements of these regulations can be found the
respective final rules, however, a brief summary of each rule is
provided below.
    First, as part of the framework to implement the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS, EPA promulgated an implementation rule in two phases.\1\ The
Phase II Rule is relevant to today's action. This rule, among other
changes, revised the PSD regulations to recognize nitrogen oxide
(NOX) as an ozone precursor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ EPA promulgated the Phase I Rule on April 30, 2004 entitled
``Final Rule To Implement the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard--Phase 1.'' See 69 FR 23951.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, the NSR PM2.5 Rule revised the NSR program to
establish the framework for implementing preconstruction permit review
for the PM2.5 NAAQS in both attainment areas and
nonattainment areas. The PSD requirements included: (1) A provision
that NSR permits address directly emitted PM2.5 and
precursor pollutants; (2) a requirement establishing significant
emission rates for direct PM2.5 and precursor pollutants
(including sulfur dioxide (SO2) and NOX); (3)
exceptions to the grandfathering policy for permits being reviewed
under the PM10 surrogate program; and, (4) a revision that
states account for gases that condense to form particles (condensables)
in PM2.5 and PM10 emission limits in PSD permits.
    Third, in the GHG Tailoring Rule, EPA tailored the applicability
criteria that determine which GHG emission sources become subject to
the PSD program of the CAA. See 75 FR 31514.
    Lastly, the PM2.5 PSD Increment-SILs-SMC Rule (only as
it relates to PM2.5 increments) provided additional
regulatory requirements under the PSD program regarding the
implementation of the PM2.5 NAAQS for NSR by specifically
establishing PM2.5 increments pursuant to section 166(a) of
the CAA to prevent significant deterioration of air quality in areas
meeting the NAAQS.
    The PSD requirements promulgated in the aforementioned regulations
establish the framework for a comprehensive SIP PSD program which EPA
has determined are necessary to comply with prong 3 of 110(a)(2)(D)(i).
The following provides a listing of relevant EPA approvals for Florida
SIP revisions to address PSD requirements.
    1. EPA's approval of Florida's PSD/NSR regulations which address
the Ozone Implementation NSR Update requirements was published in the
Federal Register on June 15, 2012 (77 FR 35862).
    2. EPA's approval of Florida's NSR PM2.5 Rule was
published in the Federal

Register on September 19, 2012 (77 FR 58027).
    3. EPA's approval of Florida's PSD/PM2.5 approving
PM2.5 increments was published in the Federal Register on
September 19, 2012 (77 FR 58027).
    These three approval actions demonstrate that Florida's SIP-
approved PSD program meets three of the four required regulatory
elements necessary to satisfy prong 3 of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i).
    With respect to the fourth necessary regulatory element--the GHG
Tailoring Rule--Florida did not submit a SIP revision to adopt the
appropriate emission thresholds for determining which new stationary
sources and modification projects become subject to PSD permitting
requirements for their GHG emissions as promulgated in the GHG
Tailoring Rule. Therefore, Florida's federally-approved SIP contained
errors that resulted in its failure to address, or provide adequate
legal authority for, the implementation of a GHG PSD program in
Florida. In the GHG SIP Call,\2\ EPA determined that the State of
Florida's SIP was substantially inadequate to achieve CAA requirements
because its existing PSD program does not apply to GHG-emitting
sources. This rule finalized a SIP call for 15 state and local
permitting authorities including Florida. EPA explained that if a
state, identified in the SIP call, failed to submit the required
corrective SIP revision by the applicable deadline, EPA would
promulgate a FIP under CAA section 110(c)(1)(A) for that state to
govern PSD permitting for GHG. On December 30, 2010, EPA promulgated a
FIP \3\ because Florida failed to submit, by its December 22, 2010,
deadline, the corrective SIP revision to apply its PSD program to
sources of GHG consistent with the thresholds described in the GHG
Tailoring rule. The FIP ensured that a permitting authority (i.e., EPA)
would be available to issue preconstruction PSD permits to GHG-emitting
sources in the State of Florida. EPA took these actions through interim
final rulemaking, effective upon publication, to ensure the
availability of a permitting authority--EPA--in Florida for GHG-
emitting sources when they became subject to PSD on January 2, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Action to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits Under the
Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program to Sources of
Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Finding of Substantial Inadequacy and SIP
Call, Final Rule, 75 FR 77698 (December 13, 2010).
    \3\ Action to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits under the
Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program to Sources of
Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Federal Implementation Plan--Final Rule,
75 FR 82246 (December 30, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Florida SIP currently does not provide adequate legal authority
to address the GHG PSD permitting requirements at or above the levels
of emissions set forth in the GHG Tailoring Rule, or at other
appropriate levels. As a result, EPA has preliminarily determined that
the Florida SIP does not satisfy a portions of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)
prong 3 for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 infrastructure
requirements. Therefore, EPA is proposing disapproval of FDEP's
submission for prong 3 of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) as it relates relate
to GHG PSD permitting requirements. EPA's proposed disapproval of this
element does not result in any further obligation on the part of
Florida, because EPA has already promulgated a FIP for the Florida PSD
program to address permitting GHG at or above the GHG Tailoring Rule
thresholds (76 FR 25178). Thus, today's proposed action to approve in
part, and disapprove in part, FDEP's submission for prong 3 of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i), once final, will not require any further action by
either FDEP or EPA.

IV. Proposed Action

    As described above, EPA is proposing to approve in part, and
disapprove in part, the SIP revision for Florida to incorporate
provisions into the State's implementation plan to address prong 3 of
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the CAA for both the 1997 annual and 2006
24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. Specifically, EPA is proposing to
approve the State's prong 3 of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) submissions as
they relate to the ``Phase II Rule,'' the ``NSR PM2.5
Rule,'' and the ``PM2.5 PSD Increment-SILs-SMC Rule (only as
it relates to PM2.5 increments)'' because they are
consistent with section 110 of the CAA. EPA also is proposing to
disapprove Florida's submissions for the portion of the section
110(a)(2)(D)(i) prong 3 requirements related to the regulation of GHG
emissions.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
proposed action merely approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country, and EPA
notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: November 21, 2012.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2012-29400 Filed 12-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 60 (Friday, March 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17613-17615]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06965]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-71777; File No. SR-EDGX-2014-06]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Add a
Reference to Rule 10C-1 Under the Exchange Act in EDGX Rule 14.1
Concerning Unlisted Trading Privileges

March 24, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on March 12, 2014, EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b 4.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing with the Commission a proposal to amend
Exchange Rule 14.1 to make clear that the Exchange will not list equity
securities without first ensuring that its rules comply with Rule 10C-1
under the Act (``Rule 10C-1''). The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's Internet Web site at www.directedge.com, at
the Exchange's principal office, and at the Public Reference Room of
the Commission.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 14.1 to make clear
that the Exchange will not list equity securities without first
ensuring that its rules comply with Rule 10C-1.
    On March 30, 2011, to implement Section 10C of the Act, as added by
Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act of 2010,\3\ the Commission proposed Rule 10C-1 under the
Act,\4\ which directs each national securities exchange to prohibit the
listing of any equity security of any issuer, with certain exceptions,
that does not comply with the rule's requirements regarding
compensation committees of listed issuers and related requirements
regarding compensation advisers. On June 20, 2012, the Commission
adopted Rule 10C-1.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1900 (2010).
    \4\ See Securities Act Release No. 9199, Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 64149 (March 30, 2011), 76 FR 18966 (April 6, 2011)
(``Rule 10C-1 Proposing Release'').
    \5\ See 17 CFR 240.10C-1 and Securities Exchange Act Release No.
67220 (June 20, 2012), 77 FR 38422 (June 27, 2012) (``Rule 10C-1
Adopting Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Exchange Rule 14.1 states that the Exchange extends unlisted
trading privileges (``UTP'') to equity securities listed on another
national securities exchange.\6\ Rule 14.1 further states that, should
the Exchange wish to permit the listing of equity securities, pursuant
to Rules 14.2 through 14.9, it must first file a proposed rule change
with the Commission amending its rules to comply with Rule 10A-3 under
the Act, among other requirements.\7\ Accordingly, the Exchange
proposes to add a reference to Rule 10C-1 under the Act, which requires
securities exchanges that list equity securities to adopt rules
relating to the independence of compensation committees and their
advisers.\8\ In particular, the following change will be made to the
text of Rule 14.1(a) (proposed text to be added is underlined):

    \6\ See Exchange Rule 14.1.
    \7\ Id.
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.10C-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, the provisions of Rules 14.2 through 14.9 that permit
the listing of Equity Securities other than common stock, secondary
classes of common stock, preferred stock and similar issues, shares
or certificates of beneficial interest of trusts, notes, limited
partnership interests, warrants, certificates of deposit for common
stock, convertible debt securities, American Depositary Receipts
(``ADRs''), and contingent value rights (``CVRs'') will not be
effective until the Exchange files a proposed rule change under
Section 19(b)(2) under the Exchange Act to amend its rules to comply
with Rules 10A-3 and 10C-1 under the Exchange Act and to incorporate
qualitative listing criteria, and such proposed rule change is
approved by the Commission.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\9\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. The rule change will promote
these goals by clarifying further the intent of Rule 14.1, which exists
to permit the Exchange to extend UTP to stocks that are listed on
another national securities exchange pursuant to Section 12(f) of the
Act.\11\ The proposed amendments to Rule 14.1 emphasize that the
Exchange will not list securities pursuant to Rules 14.2 through 14.9
until it proposes certain rule changes and those changes are approved
by the Commission. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the protection of investors because it clarifies the
fact that the Exchange will not list equity securities without first
ensuring that its rules comply with Rule 10C-1, which implements
Section 10C of the Act. These clarifications will also serve to protect
investors and the public interest by preventing confusion about the
intent of Rule 14.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. The proposed
rule change simply requires the codification of standards to which
compensation committees of listed companies will be held should such
companies choose to list their securities on the Exchange if the
Exchange were to become a relevant listing exchange.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)\12\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)\13\ thereunder. The
proposed rule change effects a change that (A) does not significantly
affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (B) does not
impose any significant burden on competition; and (C) by its terms,
does not become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest; provided that the
self-regulatory organization has given the Commission written notice of
its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five
business days prior to the date of filing of the

proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange provided the Commission with written notice of its
intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description
and text of the proposed rule change, at least five (5) business days
prior to the date of filing.\14\ The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement [sic].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change meets the
requirements of Rule 19b-4(f)(6).\15\ Specifically, the proposal does
not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest because it simply requires the codification of standards to
which compensation committees of listed companies will be held if the
Exchange were to become a listing market. Further, it does not involve
any novel or complex issue and is substantially similar to the UTP
listing rules of the BATS-Y Exchange, Inc. (``BYX'').\16\ Furthermore,
the proposed rule change benefits investors in that it increases
transparency for investors and promotes responsible corporate
governance by requiring the codification of standards for compensation
committees of listed companies should the Exchange become a primary
listing exchange. Accordingly, the Exchange has designated this rule
filing as non-controversial under Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act\17\
and paragraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \16\ See BYX Rule 14.1. Securities Exchange Act Release No.
70623 (October 8, 2013), 78 FR 6277 (October 22, 2013).
    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-EDGX-2014-06 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2014-06. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2014-06, and should be
submitted on or before April 18, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-06965 Filed 3-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 10, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50921-50922]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22015]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0057; FRL-9983-04]

Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee; Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Office of Pesticide Programs
is announcing a public meeting of the Pesticide Program Dialogue
Committee (PPDC) on October 31, 2018. This

meeting is intended to provide advice and recommendations to the EPA
Administrator on issues associated with pesticide regulatory
development and reform initiatives, evolving public policy and program
implementation issues, and science issues associated with evaluating
and reducing risks from use of pesticides.

DATES: The PPDC meeting will be held on Wednesday, October 31, 2018,
from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Thursday, November 1, 2018, from 8:30 a.m.
to 12 p.m. there will be an informational seminar on biotechnology-
pesticide issues held for stakeholders.
    Agenda: A draft agenda will be posted on or before October 19,
2018.
    Accommodations requests: To request accommodation of a disability,
please contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much
time as possible to process your request.

ADDRESSES: The PPDC Meeting and informational seminar will be held at 1
Potomac Yard South, 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA, in the lobby-
level Conference Center.
    EPA's Potomac Yard South Bldg. is approximately 1 mile from the
Crystal City Metro Station.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shannon Jewell, Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 2777 Crystal Drive,
Arlington, VA 22206; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you work in an
agricultural setting or if you are concerned about implementation of
the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA); the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA); and the amendments to
both of these major pesticide laws by the Food Quality Protection Act
(FQPA) of 1996; the Pesticide Registration Improvement Act, and the
Endangered Species Act. Potentially affected entities may include, but
are not limited to: Agricultural workers and farmers; pesticide
industry and trade associations; environmental, consumer, and farm
worker groups; pesticide users and growers; animal rights groups; pest
consultants; State, local, and tribal governments; academia; public
health organizations; and the public. If you have questions regarding
the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    The docket for this action, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0057, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Background

    The PPDC is a federal advisory committee chartered under the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), Public Law 92-463. EPA
established the PPDC in September 1995 to provide advice and
recommendations to the EPA Administrator on issues associated with
pesticide regulatory development and reform initiatives, evolving
public policy and program implementation issues, and science issues
associated with evaluating and reducing risks from use of pesticides.
The following sectors are represented on the current PPDC:
Environmental/public interest and animal rights groups; farm worker
organizations; pesticide industry and trade associations; pesticide
user, grower, and commodity groups; Federal and State/local/tribal
governments; the general public; academia; and public health
organizations.

III. How can I request to participate in this meeting?

    PPDC meetings are free, open to the public, and no advance
registration is required. Public comments may be made during the public
comment session on October 31st or in writing to the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: September 5, 2018.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2018-22015 Filed 10-9-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on June 6, 2003

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2003-15231

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Applicant:  Triair (Bermuda) Limited					Date Filed:  May 20, 2003

Relief requested: Exemption from 49 U.S.C. § 41301 to engage in charter
foreign air transportation of persons (and their accompanying baggage)
between the United Kingdom and the United States; and other charters in
accordance with Part 212 of our rules.  Triar proposes to conduct the
authorized services with small aircraft.

Date and citation of last action:  May 22, 2002, in Docket
OST-2002-11968

Applicant representative:  David Crawshaw, Head Operations Official  011
44 1458 272788

DOT Analyst:  Gordon H. Bingham<PHONE_NUMBER>

Responsive pleadings:  None filed

	DISPOSITION

Action:  Approved								Action date:  June 6, 2003

Effective dates of authority granted:  June 6, 2003-June 6, 2004

Basis for approval (bilateral agreement/reciprocity):  Air Services
Agreement between the United States and the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern Ireland

Except to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to the
terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

X Standard exemption conditions (attached)

Special conditions/Partial grant/Denial basis/Remarks:  The services
authorized above are limited to charter services with small aircraft
(i.e., aircraft designed to have a maximum passenger capacity of not
more than 60 seats or a maximum payload capacity of not more than 18,000
pounds)

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		      Office of International Aviation

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) the applicant was qualified to perform the
proposed operations; (2) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (3) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (4) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted/deferred/dismissed, we denied all requests in
the referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority
granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR §
385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date of
issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and the
filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp"
http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

												        Appendix A

FOREIGN AIR CARRIER CONDITIONS OF AUTHORITY

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the holder shall:

(1)  Not conduct any operations unless it holds a currently effective
authorization from its homeland for such operations, and it has filed a
copy of such authorization with the Department;

(2)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration, including, but not limited to, 14 CFR Parts 129, 91, and
36, and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning
security;1

(3)  Comply with the requirements for minimum insurance coverage
contained in 14 CFR Part 205, and, prior to the commencement of any
operations under this authority, file evidence of such coverage, in the
form of a completed OST Form 6411, with the Federal Aviation
Administration’s Program Management Branch (AFS-260), Flight Standards
Service (any changes to, or termination of, insurance also shall be
filed with that office);

(4)  Not operate aircraft under this authority unless it complies with
operational safety requirements at least equivalent to Annex 6 of the
Chicago Convention;

(5)  Conform to the airworthiness and airman competency requirements of
its Government for international air services;

(6)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 203,
concerning waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(7)  Agree that operations under this authority constitute a waiver of
sovereign immunity, for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1605(a), but only with
respect to those actions or proceedings instituted against it in any
court or other tribunal in the United States that are:

   (a)  based on its operations in international air transportation
that, according to the contract of carriage, include a point in the
United States as a point of origin, point of destination, or agreed
stopping place, or for which the contract of carriage was purchased in
the United States; or

   (b)  based on a claim under any international agreement or treaty
cognizable in any court or other tribunal of the United States.

In this condition, the term "international air transportation" means
"international transportation" as defined by the Warsaw Convention,
except that all States shall be considered to be High Contracting
Parties for the purpose of this definition;

(8)  Except as specifically authorized by the Department, originate or
terminate all flights to/from the United States in its homeland;

(9)  Comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 217, concerning the
reporting of scheduled, nonscheduled, and charter data;

(10) If charter operations are authorized, except as otherwise provided
in the applicable aviation agreement, comply with the Department's rules
governing charters (including 14 CFR Parts 212 and 380); and

(11) Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department, with all applicable orders or regulations of other U.S.
agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the United States.

This authority shall not be effective during any period when the holder
is not in compliance with the conditions imposed above.  Moreover, this
authority cannot be sold or otherwise transferred without explicit
Department approval under Title 49 of the U.S. Code (formerly the
Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended).

__________________

1  To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, the holder should, before commencing any new
service (including charter flights) from a foreign airport that would be
the holder’s last point of departure for the United States, inform its
Principal Security Inspector of its plans.

U.S. Department of Transportation

Office of the Secretary of Transportation									        (41301/40109)
10/2002


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18110-18111]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08614]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-83064; File No. SR-BX-2018-014]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Clarify the
Requirements for Delivery of a Contrary Exercise Advice

April 19, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 9, 2018, Nasdaq BX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the rules of the Exchange, at
Chapter VIII, Exercises and Deliveries.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at http://nasdaqbx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal office
of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to correct Chapter VIII, Exercises and
Deliveries, Section 1, Exercise of Options Contracts, to clarify the
requirements for delivery of a Contrary Exercise Advice. Section 1(b)
currently provides that option holders desiring to exercise or not
exercise expiring options must either (i) take no action and allow
exercise determinations to be made in accordance with the Options
Clearing Corporation's Ex-by- Ex procedure where applicable, or (ii)
submit a ``Contrary Exercise Advice'' to the Options Clearing
Corporation through the participant's clearing firm. In actual
practice, however, an option holder delivers a Contrary Exchange Advice
to the Exchange, not to the Options Clearing Corporation. The Exchange
therefore proposes to replace the words ``Options Clearing Corporation
through the participants clearing firm'' in Section 1(b)(ii) with a
reference to the Exchange and make similar, conforming changes to
Section 1(e)(i). As amended, Section 1(b) would be consistent with
Nasdaq ISE Rule 1100(b) which directs option holders to submit Contrary
Exercise Advices to the Exchange (not to the Options Clearing
Corporation).
    The Exchange proposes to further replace the words ``by the
deadline specified in paragraph (d) below'' with the words ``as
specified in paragraph (d) below'' given that paragraph (d) contains a
number of requirements associated with submission of Contrary Exercise
Advices in addition to the deadline. As revised, Section (b)(ii) tracks
the language of ISE Rule 1100(b)(ii) which permits an options holder
desiring to exercise or not exercise expiring options to ``submit a
``Contrary Exercise Advice'' to the Exchange as specified in paragraph
(d) . . . .'' (which, like the counterpart BX paragraph (d) rule,
specifies various requirements associated with submitting Contrary
Exercise Advices).
    Finally, the Exchange proposes to make a number of minor
nonsubstantive revisions to Chapter VIII which are designed simply to
facilitate administration of the rules. References to ``BX'' and to
``BX Regulation'' are proposed to be replaced with references to ``the
Exchange.'' \3\ Substituting the word ``Exchange'' for BX in various
places will provide the Exchange flexibility to determine the most
appropriate department or individual within the Exchange to oversee the
particular rule, and will also facilitate the incorporation by
reference of the amended rule into the rules of BX's affiliated
exchanges in the future.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The changes are proposed to be made in Section 1(b), (d),
(e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (k) and (l), as well as in Section 2(a) and
(b), of Chapter VIII. The Exchange notes that Chapter 11, Exercises
and Deliveries, of the ISE Rulebook likewise uses the generic term
``the Exchange'' throughout that chapter.
    \4\ Recently, the Exchange added a shell structure to its
Rulebook with the purpose of improving efficiency and readability
and to align its rules closer to those of its five sister exchanges,
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Nasdaq
GEMX, LLC; and Nasdaq MRX, LLC (``Affiliated Exchanges''). See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82174 (November 29, 2017), 82 FR
57492 (December 5, 2017) (SR-BX-2017-054). The changes proposed
herein are being made in connection with that effort, to align the
BX rules with those of the Affiliated Exchanges more closely.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\5\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\6\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest,
by identifying the correct entity to which option holders must deliver
Contrary Exercise Advices and by substituting the word ``Exchange'' for
BX in various places which will enable the amended rule to be
incorporated by reference into rules of affiliated exchanges in the
future, which should enhance the ability of members of BX and
affiliated exchanges to understand and comply with a uniform set of
rules across the exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule changes will
apply equally to all option holders desiring to exercise options under
the BX rules. Further, the proposed changes merely correct an incorrect
reference to OCC and conform the wording of the rule more closely to
that of a Nasdaq ISE rule for the sake of administrative convenience.
The Exchange does not

intend for or expect that such changes will have any impact on
competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \7\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-BX-2018-014 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2018-014. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-BX-2018-014, and should be submitted on
or before May 16, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2018-08614 Filed 4-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 56 (Tuesday, March 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15603-15604]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06668]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2014-0083; FRL--9925-04-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Carbon Black, Ethylene, Cyanide
and Spandex (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), ``NESHAP for Carbon Black,
Ethylene, Cyanide and Spandex (40 CFR part 63, subpart YY) (Renewal)''
(EPA ICR No. 1983.07, OMB Control No. 2060-0489) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). This is a
proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through
April 30, 2015. Public comments were previously requested via the
Federal Register (79 FR 30117) on May 27, 2014 during a 60-day comment
period. This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public
comments. A fuller description of the ICR is given below, including its
estimated burden and cost to the public. An Agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before April 23,
2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2014-0082, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA
Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer for
EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Yellin, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, EPA WJC
West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The
telephone number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: Owners and operators of carbon black production, ethylene
production, cyanide chemicals manufacturing, and spandex production
facilities are subject to 40 CFR part 63, subpart YY. They are required
to provide initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic
reports. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence
and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation
of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring
system is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are
essential in determining compliance, and are required of all affected
facilities subject to NESHAP. This information is being collected to
assure compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart YY.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Owners and operators of carbon black
production, ethylene production, cyanide chemicals manufacturing, and
spandex production facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart YY).
    Estimated number of respondents: 61 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, semiannually and
annually.
    Total estimated burden: 41,753 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $4,549,698 (per year), includes $350,957
annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an increase of 28,229 hours in
the total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently
approved by OMB. The respondent burden hours and costs increased
because the previous

ICR substantially underestimated the time and effort to collect,
compile and maintain records and information required by the standard.

Courtney Kerwin,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-06668 Filed 3-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 107 (Thursday, June 4, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31847-31850]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13664]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 64

[Docket ID FEMA-2015-0001; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-8385]

Suspension of Community Eligibility

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule identifies communities where the sale of flood
insurance has been authorized under the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP) that are scheduled for suspension on the effective dates
listed within this rule because of noncompliance with the floodplain
management requirements of the program. If the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) receives documentation that the community has
adopted the required floodplain management measures prior to the
effective suspension date given in this rule, the suspension will not
occur and a notice of this will be provided by publication in the
Federal Register on a subsequent date. Also, information identifying
the current participation status of a community can be obtained from
FEMA's Community Status Book (CSB). The CSB is available at http://www.fema.gov/fema/csb.shtm.

DATES: The effective date of each community's scheduled suspension is
the third date (``Susp.'') listed in the third column of the following
tables.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you want to determine whether a
particular community was suspended on the suspension date or for
further information, contact Bret Gates, Federal Insurance and
Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP enables property owners to purchase
Federal flood insurance that is not otherwise generally available from
private insurers. In return, communities agree to adopt and administer
local floodplain management measures aimed at protecting lives and new
construction from future flooding. Section 1315 of the National Flood
Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4022, prohibits the sale
of NFIP flood insurance unless an appropriate public body adopts
adequate floodplain management measures with effective enforcement
measures. The communities listed in this document no longer meet that
statutory requirement for compliance with program regulations, 44 CFR
part 59. Accordingly, the communities will be suspended on the
effective date in the third column. As of that date, flood insurance
will no longer be available in the community. We recognize that some of
these communities may adopt and submit the required documentation of
legally enforceable floodplain management measures after this rule is
published but prior to the actual suspension date. These communities
will not be suspended and will continue to be eligible for the sale of
NFIP flood insurance. A notice withdrawing the suspension of such
communities will be published in the Federal Register.
    In addition, FEMA publishes a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) that
identifies the Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) in these communities.
The date of the FIRM, if one has been published, is indicated in the
fourth column of the table. No direct Federal financial assistance
(except assistance pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act not in connection with a flood) may be
provided for construction or acquisition of buildings in identified
SFHAs for communities not participating in the NFIP and identified for
more than a year on FEMA's initial FIRM for the community as having
flood-prone areas (section 202(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act
of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4106(a), as amended). This prohibition against
certain types of Federal assistance becomes effective for the
communities listed on the date shown in the last column. The
Administrator finds that notice and public comment procedures under 5
U.S.C. 553(b), are impracticable and unnecessary because communities
listed in this final rule have been adequately notified.
    Each community receives 6-month, 90-day, and 30-day notification
letters addressed to the Chief Executive Officer stating that the
community will be suspended unless the required floodplain management
measures are met prior to the effective suspension date. Since these
notifications were made, this final rule may take effect within less
than 30 days.
    National Environmental Policy Act. This rule is categorically
excluded from the requirements of 44 CFR part 10, Environmental
Considerations. No environmental impact assessment has been prepared.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. The Administrator has determined that
this rule is exempt from the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act because the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended,
Section 1315, 42 U.S.C. 4022, prohibits flood insurance coverage unless
an appropriate public body adopts adequate floodplain management
measures with effective enforcement measures. The communities listed no
longer comply with the statutory requirements, and after the effective
date, flood insurance will no longer be available in the communities
unless remedial action takes place.
    Regulatory Classification. This final rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the criteria of section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 of September 30, 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR
51735.
    Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This rule involves no policies
that have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
    Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule meets the
applicable standards of Executive Order 12988.
    Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule does not involve any collection
of information for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 64

    Flood insurance, Floodplains.

    Accordingly, 44 CFR part 64 is amended as follows:

PART 64--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 64 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp.; p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR,
1979 Comp.; p. 376.

Sec.  64.6  [Amended]

0
2. The tables published under the authority of Sec.  64.6 are amended
as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                Effective date
                                                authorization/
                                  Community     cancellation of    Current effective map   Date certain federal
      State and location             No.         sale of flood             date            assistance no longer
                                                 insurance in                               available in SFHAs
                                                   community
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Region I

Maine:
    Belfast, City of, Waldo           230129  July 8, 1975,       July 6, 2015..........  July 6, 2015.
     County.                                   Emerg; May 3,
                                               1990, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Brooks, Town of, Waldo            230253  July 23, 1975,      ......do *............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; September
                                               18, 1985, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Burnham, Town of, Waldo           230130  November 3, 1977,   ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; June 3,
                                               1991, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Frankfort, Town of, Waldo         230254  June 5, 1975,       ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; May 17,
                                               1990, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Freedom, Town of, Waldo           230255  October 1, 1975,    ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; September
                                               27, 1985, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Isleboro, Town of, Waldo          230256  May 30, 1975,       ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; May 15,
                                               1991, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Knox, Town of, Waldo              230258  July 30, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; September
                                               27, 1985, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Liberty, Town of, Waldo           230259  July 23, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; September
                                               27, 1985, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Lime Island, Waldo County.        230985  April 4, 1979,      ......do..............   Do.
                                               Emerg; April 30,
                                               1984, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Lincolnville, Town of,            230172  October 1, 1975,    ......do..............   Do.
     Waldo County.                             Emerg; May 3,
                                               1990, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Little Bermuda Island,            230984  April 4, 1979,      ......do..............   Do.
     Waldo County.                             Emerg; April 30,
                                               1984, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Monroe, Town of, Waldo            230260  May 22, 1975,       ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; September
                                               27, 1985, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Montville, Town of, Waldo         230261  October 2, 2008,    ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; April 1,
                                               2009, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Morrill, Town of, Waldo           230262  July 16, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; September
                                               18, 1985, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Northport, Town of, Waldo         230179  July 23, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; May 15,
                                               1991, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Palermo, Town of, Waldo           230263  July 15, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; March 1,
                                               1987, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Searsmont, Town of, Waldo         230265  July 16, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; September
                                               27, 1985, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Searsport, Town of, Waldo         230185  July 2, 1975,       ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; May 17,
                                               1990, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Stockton Springs, Town of,        230266  July 30, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     Waldo County.                             Emerg; February
                                               4, 1987, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Swanville, Town of, Waldo         230267  June 11, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; February
                                               4, 1987, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Thorndike, Town of Waldo          230268  June 14, 1976,      ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; September
                                               27, 1985, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Troy, Town of, Waldo              230269  March 15, 1976,     ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; April 17,
                                               1987, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Unity, Town of, Waldo             230131  July 15, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; September
                                               27, 1985, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Winterport, Town of, Waldo        230271  October 1, 1975,    ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; May 3,
                                               1990, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.

          Region III

Virginia:
    Charles City County,              510198  October 20, 1975,   ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                     Emerg; September
                                               5, 1990, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.

           Region IV

Florida:
    Clewistown, City of,              120108  September 29,       ......do..............   Do.
     Hendry County.                            1972, Emerg;
                                               March 15, 1977,
                                               Reg; July 6,
                                               2015, Susp.
    Hendry County,                    120107  August 27, 1974,    ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                     Emerg; May 17,
                                               1982, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    LaBelle, City of, Hendry          120109  July 30, 1974,      ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; January
                                               20, 1982, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.

           Region V

Michigan:
    Fruitland, Township of,           260265  December 11, 1973,  ......do..............   Do.
     Muskegon County.                          Emerg; September
                                               1, 1986, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Montague, City of,                260160  April 12, 1974,     ......do..............   Do.
     Muskegon County.                          Emerg; May 1,
                                               1978, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.

    Muskegon, Charter                 260163  September 6, 1974,  ......do..............   Do.
     Township, Muskegon County.                Emerg; August 1,
                                               1977, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Muskegon, City of,                260161  May 25, 1973,       ......do..............   Do.
     Muskegon County.                          Emerg; June 1,
                                               1977, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Muskegon Heights, City of,        260162  May 9, 1975,        ......do..............   Do.
     Muskegon County.                          Emerg; February
                                               18, 1981, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    North Muskegon, City of,          260164  December 11, 1973,  ......do..............   Do.
     Muskegon County.                          Emerg; May 2,
                                               1977, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Norton Shores, City of,           260162  May 9, 1975,        ......do..............   Do.
     Muskegon County.                          Emerg; February
                                               18, 1981, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Muskegon Heights, City of,        260162  May 9, 1975,        ......do..............   Do.
     Muskegon County.                          Emerg; February
                                               18, 1981, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    North Muskegon, City of,          260164  December 11, 1973,  ......do..............   Do.
     Muskegon County.                          Emerg; May 2,
                                               1977, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Norton Shores, City of,           260165  April 6, 1973,      ......do..............   Do.
     Muskegon County.                          Emerg; September
                                               15, 1977, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Ravenna, Township of,             260731  October 6, 1982,    ......do..............   Do.
     Muskegon County.                          Emerg; May 17,
                                               1989, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    White River, Township of,         260299  June 21, 1974,      ......do..............   Do.
     Muskegon County.                          Emerg; January
                                               16, 1981, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Whitehall, City of,               260166  May 13, 1975,       ......do..............   Do.
     Muskegon County.                          Emerg; October
                                               15, 1980, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.

           Region VI

Arkansas:
    Alexander, Town of,               050377  September 26,       ......do..............   Do.
     Pulaski and Saline                        1980, Emerg;
     Counties.                                 January 20, 1982,
                                               Reg; July 6,
                                               2015, Susp.
    Jacksonville, City of,            050180  November 26, 1973,  ......do..............   Do.
     Pulaski County.                           Emerg; September
                                               29, 1978, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Little Rock, City of,             050181  March 16, 1973,     ......do..............   Do.
     Pulaski County.                           Emerg; March 4,
                                               1980, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Maumelle, City of, Pulaski        050577  March 6, 1979,      ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; February
                                               29, 1988, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    North Little Rock, City           050182  January 17, 1974,   ......do..............   Do.
     of, Pulaski County.                       Emerg; July 16,
                                               1980, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Pulaski County,                   050179  March 6, 1979,      ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                     Emerg; July 16,
                                               1981, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Sherwood, City of, Pulaski        050235  February 15, 1974,  ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                   Emerg; October
                                               17, 1978, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
Louisiana:
    Campti, Town of,                  220401  August 28, 1992,    ......do..............   Do.
     Natchitoches Parish.                      Emerg; July 3,
                                               2003, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Clarence, Village of,             220130  March 8, 1976,      ......do..............   Do.
     Natchitoches Parish.                      Emerg; September
                                               18, 1987, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Goldonna, Village of,             220290  April 2, 1981,      ......do..............   Do.
     Natchitoches Parish.                      Emerg; June 29,
                                               1982, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Natchez, Village of,              220370  September 29,       ......do..............   Do.
     Natchitoches Parish.                      1975, Emerg;
                                               September 18,
                                               1987, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Natchitoches, City of,            220131  April 17, 1974,     ......do..............   Do.
     Natchitoches Parish.                      Emerg; September
                                               18, 1987, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Natchitoches Parish,              220129  May 10, 1973,       ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                     Emerg; September
                                               18, 1987, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Provencal, Village of,            220132  June 27, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     Natchitoches Parish.                      Emerg; November
                                               1, 1992, Reg;
                                               July 6, 2015,
                                               Susp.
    Robeline, Village of,             220133  August 11, 1975,    ......do..............   Do.
     Natchitoches Parish.                      Emerg; August 5,
                                               1985, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.

          Region VIII

Montana:
    Missoula, City of,                300049  March 14, 1975,     ......do..............   Do.
     Missoula County.                          Emerg; January 6,
                                               1983, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
    Missoula County,                  300048  January 15, 1975,   ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                     Emerg; August 15,
                                               1983, Reg; July
                                               6, 2015, Susp.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* -do- =Ditto.
Code for reading third column: Emerg.--Emergency; Reg.--Regular; Susp.--Suspension.

    Dated: May 18, 2015.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Administration, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2015-13664 Filed 6-3-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P