[Federal Register: May 19, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 97)]
[Notices]
[Page 28818-28819]
[DOCID:fr19my08-50]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0299; FRL-8567-9]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Worker Protection Standard
Training and Notification; EPA ICR No. 1759.05, OMB Control No. 2070-
0148

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)(44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below, describes the
nature of the information collection and its estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before June 18, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPP-
2007-0299, to (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: OPP
Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB by mail to: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Attention:
Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Hogue, Field and External
Affairs Division, Office of Pesticide

Programs, (7506P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On November 16, 2007 (72 FR 64611), EPA sought comments on
this ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any
additional comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB
within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0299, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the OPP Regulatory
Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S.
Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
docket telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as EPA
receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For
further information about the electronic docket, go to http://
www.regulations.gov.
    Title: Worker Protection Standard Training and Notification.
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1759.05, OMB Control No. 2070-0148.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on May 31, 2008. Under
OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the
collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: EPA is responsible for the regulation of pesticides under
the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). The
Worker Protection Standard (WPS), codified at 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 170, established requirements to protect
agricultural workers and pesticide handlers from hazards of pesticides
used on farms, on forests, in nurseries and in greenhouses. 40 CFR part
170 contains the standard and workplace practices, which are designed
to reduce or eliminate exposure to pesticides and establish procedures
for responding to exposure-related emergencies. The practices include
prohibitions against applying pesticides in a way that would cause
exposure to workers and others; a waiting period before workers can
return to areas treated with pesticides (restricted entry interval);
basic safety training (and voluntary training verification) and posting
of information about pesticide hazards, as well as pesticide
application information; arrangements for the supply of soap, water,
and towels in case of pesticide exposure; and provisions for emergency
assistance. The training verification program facilitates compliance
with the training requirements by providing a voluntary method for
employers to verify that the required safety information has been
provided to workers and handlers.
    This renewal ICR estimates the third party response burden from
complying with the Worker Protection Standard requirements. Information
is exchanged between agricultural employers and employees at farm,
forest, nursery and greenhouse establishments to ensure worker safety.
No information is collected by the Agency under this ICR. Responses to
this ICR are mandatory. The authority for this information collection
is provided under section 25 of FIFRA and 40 CFR part 170.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.15
hours (about 9 minutes) per response, ranging from two minutes to 45
minutes for the various types of responses. Burden means the total
time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate,
maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a
Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions;
develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the
purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information,
processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing
information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously
applicable instructions and requirements which have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Agricultural employers, including
employers in farms as well as nursery, forestry, and greenhouse
establishments.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 3,245,393.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 1,776,131
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $76,574,607, includes $0 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: The total estimated annual respondent
burden for this ICR renewal is 1,776,131 hours, a reduction of 517,233
from the 2,293,364 total estimated burden hours in the currently-
approved ICR. This change is an adjustment and is the result of a
correction to the estimated annual number of treatment-specific worker
and handler notification events, both oral and posted. Although EPA had
correctly explained the method of calculating the number of
notifications in previous versions of this ICR, the figures presented
in the supporting statement's corresponding tables that were used to
tally the overall burden were inconsistent with EPA's explanation. EPA
has clarified its explanation in the supporting statement.

    Dated: May 9, 2008.
Sara Hisel-McCoy,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E8-11154 Filed 5-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: March 10, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 46)]
[Notices]
[Page 11167-11168]
[DOCID:fr10mr10-80]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP10-71-000]

Questar Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket
Authorization

March 2, 2010.
    Take notice that on February 22, 2010, Questar Pipeline Company
(Questar), 180 East 100 South, P.O. Box 45360, Salt Lake City, Utah
84145, filed in Docket No. CP10-71-000, an application, pursuant to
sections 157.205 and 157.210 of the Commission's Regulations under the
Natural Gas Act (NGA) as amended, to reconfigure its facilities at the
existing Fidlar compressor station in Uintah County, Utah, and uprate
the maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP) on Questar's Mainline
68 in Uintah County, Utah, and Rio Blanco County, Colorado, under
Questar's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-491-000,\1\ all
as more fully set forth in the application which is on file with the
Commission and open to the public for inspection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 20 FERC ] 62,580 (1982).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Questar proposes to reconfigure its facilities at the existing
Fidlar compressor station (Fidlar), located at the junction of
Questar's existing Main Line (ML) 103, 80, and 40 in Uintah County,
Utah, and uprate Questar's ML 68 to a MAOP of 1290 psig via gas-
pressure testing. Questar states that the proposed changes would result
in an incremental capacity increase of approximately 25,000 Dekatherms
per day and enable a dual-stage operating mode to provide greater
flexibility and increased efficiencies at Fidlar. Questar further
states that the proposed

reconfigurations would facilitate west-to-east deliveries of natural
gas volumes to Questar's affiliate, White River Hub, LLC. Questar
states that its proposed reconfigurations would cost an estimated
$2,736,538.
    Any questions concerning this application may be directed to L.
Bradley Burton, Manager, Federal Regulatory Affairs, Questar Pipeline
Company, 180 East 100 South, P.O. Box 45360, Salt Lake City, Utah
84145-0360, telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, facsimile at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
or via e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    This filing is available for review at the Commission or may be
viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number filed to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at FERC
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or, for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. Comments, protests and interventions may be
filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
intervenors to file electronically.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 60 days after
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of
the regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to the
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, the
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and
not withdrawn within 30 days after the allowed time for filing a
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the NGA.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-5004 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 81 (Friday, April 26, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24691-24692]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09763]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 1, 16, 106, 110, 114, 117, 120, 123, 129, 179, and 211

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0920]
RIN 0910-AG36

Current Good Manufacturing Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk-
Based Preventive Controls for Human Food; Extension of Comment Periods

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment periods.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is extending the
comment period for the proposed rule, and for the information
collection related to the proposed rule, ``Current Good Manufacturing
Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for
Human Food'' that appeared in the Federal Register of January 16, 2013.
We are taking this action in response to requests for an extension to
allow interested persons additional time to submit comments on the
proposed rule. We also are taking this action to keep the comment
period for the information collection provisions associated with the
rule consistent with the comment period for the proposed rule.

DATES: The comment period for the proposed rule published January 16,
2013, at 78 FR 3646, is extended. In addition, the comment period for
the information collection issues in the proposed rule, extended
February 19, 2013, at 78 FR 11611, is further extended. Submit either
electronic or written comments on the proposed rule by September 16,
2013. Submit comments on information collection issues under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 by September 16, 2013 (see the
``Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995'' section of this document).

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FDA-2011-
N-0920 and/or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) 0910-AG36, by any of
the following methods, except that comments on information collection
issues under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 must be submitted to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) (see the ``Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995'' section
of this document).

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

Written Submissions

    Submit written submissions in the following ways:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper or CD-ROM
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Agency name
and Docket No. for this rulemaking. All comments received may be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided. For additional information on submitting
comments, see the ``Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of
Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    With regard to the proposed rule: Jenny Scott, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-300), Food and Drug Administration,
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    With regard to the information collection: Domini Bean, Office of
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Picard
Drive, PI50-400T, Rockville, MD 20850<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In the Federal Register of January 16, 2013 (78 FR 3646), we
published a proposed rule entitled ``Current Good Manufacturing
Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for
Human Food'' with a 120-day comment period on the provisions of the
proposed rule and a 30-day comment period on the information collection
provisions that are subject to review by OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
    OMB and FDA previously received requests for a 90-day extension of
the comment period for the information collection provisions of the
proposed rule. We considered the requests and extended the comment
period for the information collection for 90 days to make the comment
period for the information collection provisions the same as that for
the proposed rule--i.e., until May 16, 2013 (Federal Register of
February 19, 2013, 78 FR 11611). FDA has now received comments
requesting an extension of the comment period on the proposed rule.
Each request conveyed concern that the current 120-day comment period
does not allow sufficient time to develop a meaningful or thoughtful
response to the proposed rule. FDA has considered the requests and is
granting a 120-day extension of the comment period for the proposed
rule. FDA believes that a 120-day extension allows adequate time for
interested persons to submit comments without significantly delaying
rulemaking on these important issues. We also are extending the comment
period for the information collection provisions for 120 days to
continue to make the comment period for the information collection
provisions the same as the comment period for the provisions of the
proposed rule. To clarify, FDA is requesting comment on all issues
raised by the proposed rule.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    Interested persons may either submit electronic comments regarding
the

information collection to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or fax written
comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB,
Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>. All comments should be
identified with the title ``Current Good Manufacturing Practice and
Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food.''

III. Request for Comments

    Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
the proposed rule to http://www.regulations.gov or written comments to
the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only
necessary to send one set of comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to
the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: April 22, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-09763 Filed 4-24-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 11, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45811-45813]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19565]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 11, 2018 /
Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0235; Product Identifier 2018-NE-08-AD; Amendment
39-19367; AD 2018-17-13]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG Tay
620-15 Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) Tay 620-15 turbofan engines.
This AD was prompted by reports of low-pressure compressor (LPC) fan
blade retention lug failures. This AD requires reviewing the engine
maintenance records and replacing the LPC fan blade with a part
eligible for installation if the dry-film lubricant (DFL) treatment
limit is exceeded. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective October 16, 2018.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of October 16,
2018.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG, Eschenweg 11, Dahlewitz,
15827 Blankenfelde-Mahlow, Germany; phone: +49 (0) 33-7086-1883; fax:
+49 (0) 33-7086-3276. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Engine & Propeller Standards Branch, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington,
MA 01803. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0235.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0235; or in person at the Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI), the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The address for Docket Operations (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
Docket Operations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Caufield, Aerospace Engineer,
ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:
781-238-7146; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain RRD Tay 620-15
turbofan engines. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on April
30, 2018 (83 FR 18758). The NPRM was prompted by reports of LPC fan
blade retention lug failures. The NPRM proposed to require reviewing
the engine maintenance records and replacing the LPC fan blade with a
part eligible for installation if the DFL treatment limit is exceeded.
We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
AD 2018-0013, dated January 17, 2018 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to address the unsafe condition on these products. The MCAI
states:

    Fractures of low pressure compressor (LPC) fan blade retention
lugs were reported on engines subjected to a high number of Dry Film
Lubrication (DFL) treatments. Subsequent investigation determined
that, as a consequence, the retention lugs of the affected LPC (fan)
blades had been exposed to excessive high stress cycles.
    This condition, if not detected or corrected, could lead to
failure of LPC fan blade retention lug(s), high vibration, reduced
thrust, or in-flight shut down, possibly resulting in reduced
control of the aeroplane.
    To address this potential unsafe condition, Rolls Royce
Deutschland (RRD) issued Alert Non-Modification Service Bulletin
(NMSB) TAY-72-A1834 (hereafter referred to as `the NMSB') to provide
identification and replacement instructions.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires
determination of number of DFL treatments applied to the LPC fan
blades and, based on that determination, replacement. This [EASA] AD
also introduces a maximum allowable number of DFL treatments
applicable to the LPC fan blades.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0235.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the
determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this final rule as proposed except
for minor editorial changes.
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed RRD ALERT NMSB TAY-72-A1834, dated November 17, 2017.
The Alert NMSB describes procedures for reviewing the maintenance
records and replacing the LPC fan blade with a serviceable part. This
service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Other Related Service Information

    We reviewed RRD NMSB TAY-70-1050, Revision 9, dated July 14, 2010.

The NMSB defines a basic engine life management program suitable for
RRD Tay engines in aircraft that are engaged in non-airline operations.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 25 engines installed on airplanes
of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Record search to establish number of    1.5 work-hours x $85 per              $0         $127.50       $3,187.50
 LPC blade DFL applications.             hour = $127.50.
Lost life for a LPC blade set and       4.0 work-hours x $85 per          16,550          16,890         422,250
 replacement of blades.                  hour = $340.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to engines, propellers, and
associated appliances to the Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2018-17-13 Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG: Amendment 39-19367;
Docket No. FAA-2018-0235; Product Identifier 2018-NE-08-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective October 16, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) Tay
620-15 turbofan engines with low-pressure compressor (LPC) fan
blades, having part numbers (P/Ns) JR30649, JR31702, JR31983,
JR33863, or JR33864, installed.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7230, Turbine Engine
Compressor Section.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of LPC fan blade retention lug
failures. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the LPC fan
blade retention lug. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could
result in loss of engine thrust control and reduced control of the
airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    (1) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD,
determine the number of dry-film lubricant (DFL) treatments that
were applied to the LPC fan blade by reviewing the maintenance
records or using an alternative method in steps C or N, as
applicable, of the Accomplishment Instruction, paragraph 3, of RRD
ALERT Non-Modification Service Bulletin (NMSB) TAY-72-A1834, dated
November 17, 2017.
    (2) Depending on the results of the records review, do the
following, as applicable:
    (i) If the number of DFL treatments is fewer than 13, mark the
LPC fan blade dovetail root with a suffix code during the next
scheduled LPC fan blade removal using steps H or R, as applicable,
of the Accomplishment Instruction, paragraph 3, of RRD ALERT NMSB
TAY-72-A1834, dated November 17, 2017.
    (ii) If the number of DFL treatments is 13 or more, replace the
affected LPC fan blade with a part eligible for installation within
500 flight hours after effective date of this AD.

(h) Installation Prohibition

    After the effective date of this AD, do not install an affected
LPC fan blade on any engine unless it has been determined that the
LPC fan blade has had fewer than 13 DFL treatments and has been
marked in accordance with the instructions of RRD ALERT NMSB TAY-72-
A1834, dated November 17, 2017.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD,

if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the manager of the ECO Branch,
send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph
(j)(1) of this AD. You may email your request to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(j) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Barbara
Caufield, Aerospace Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected].
    (2) Refer to European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2018-
0013, dated January 17, 2018, for more information. You may examine
the EASA AD in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2018-0235.

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG ALERT Non-Modification
Service Bulletin TAY-72-A1834, dated November 17, 2017.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG, Eschenweg 11, Dahlewitz, 15827
Blankenfelde-Mahlow, Germany; phone: +49 (0) 33-7086-1883; fax: +49
(0) 33-7086-3276.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Engine &
Propeller Standards Branch, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA
01803. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on August 29, 2018.
Karen M. Grant,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-19565 Filed 9-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: October 12, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 196)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 62459-62460]
[DOCID:fr12oc10-4]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0119 Airspace Docket No. 10-AAL-6]

Revision of Class E Airspace; Unalakleet, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action revises Class E airspace at Unalakleet, AK. The
amendment and development of two (each) Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures (SIAPs), and the development of one Obstacle Departure
Procedure (ODP) at the Unalakleet Airport have made this action
necessary to enhance safety by ensuring that sufficient Class E
airspace exists for air traffic management of Instrument Flight Rules
(IFR) operations.

DATES:  Effective 0901 UTC, January 13, 2011. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Derril Bergt, Federal Aviation
Administration, 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, Anchorage, AK 99513-7587;
telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet address: http://www.faa.gov/about/
office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/systemops/fs/
alaskan/rulemaking/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On Thursday, June 10, 2010, the FAA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register to revise Class E airspace at
Unalakleet, AK (75 FR 32865).
    Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
proceeding by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA.
No comments were received.
    There was an error in the notice of proposed rulemaking regarding
the E5 airspace coordinates for the Unalakleet VOR/DME. This error has
been corrected in the final rule. The coordinates for the Unalakleet
airport have been updated from those used in previous airspace
revisions made in 1996 and 1998 as a result of more accurate survey
data now available. With the exception of editorial changes, and the
changes described above, this rule is the same as that proposed in the
NPRM.
    The Class E airspace areas designated as a surface area for an
airport are published in paragraph 6002 of FAA Order 7400.9U, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 18, 2010, and effective
September 15, 2010, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1.
The Class E airspace areas designated as 700/1,200 ft. transition areas
are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9U, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 18, 2010, and effective
September 15, 2010, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1.
The Class E airspace designations listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by enlarging Class E5 airspace at the Unalakleet Airport,
Unalakleet, AK, to accommodate a new departure procedure, and 2 new and
amended SIAPs at Unalakleet Airport. The new SIAPs and the amendments
to existing SIAPs require that the orientation and dimensions of Class
E airspace be revised for the safety and efficiency of management of
air IFR traffic.
    The revised Class E airspace provides adequate controlled airspace
upward from the surface, and from 700 and 1,200 feet above the surface
for the safety of IFR operations at Unalakleet Airport by ensuring that
Class E airspace is sufficient for management of air traffic.

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Because this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart 1, Section 40103, Sovereignty and use of
airspace. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing
regulations to ensure the safe and efficient use of the navigable
airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because
it creates Class E airspace sufficient in size to contain aircraft
executing instrument procedures for the Unalakleet Airport, Unalakleet,
Alaska, and represents the FAA's continuing effort to safely and
efficiently use the navigable airspace.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING
POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9U, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 18, 2010, and effective September 15,
2010, is amended as follows:
* * * * *

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

AAL AK E2 Unalakleet, AK [Revised]

Unalakleet Airport, AK
    (Lat. 63[deg]53'19'' N., long. 160[deg]47'57'' W.)
Unalakleet Localizer
    (Lat. 63[deg]52'52'' N., long. 160[deg]47'42'' W.)

    Within a 4.2-mile radius of the Unalakleet Airport, AK, and
within 3.2 miles each side of the Unalakleet Localizer front course,
extending from the 4.2-mile radius to 12.6 miles northwest of the
Unalakleet Airport, AK. This Class E airspace area is effective
during the specific dates and times established in advance by Notice
to Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be
continuously published in the Supplement Alaska (Airport/Facility
Directory).
* * * * *

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Extending Upward From 700 Feet or
More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AAL AK E5 Unalakleet, AK [Revised]

Unalakleet Airport, AK
    (Lat. 63[deg]53'19'' N., long. 160[deg]47'57'' W.)
Unalakleet Localizer
    (Lat. 63[deg]52'52'' N., long. 160[deg]47'42'' W.)
Unalakleet VOR/DME
    (Lat. 63[deg]53'31'' N., long. 160[deg]41'04'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7.3-mile radius of the Unalakleet Airport, AK, and within
3.8 miles either side of the 289[deg] radial of the Unalakleet VOR/
DME, extending from the 7.3-mile radius to 15.4 miles west of the
Unalakleet VOR/DME, and within 3.6 miles either side of the
Unalakleet Localizer front course, extending from the 7.3-mile
radius to 13.6 miles northwest of the Unalakleet Airport; and that
airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface within a
74-mile radius of the Unalakleet Airport, AK.

    Issued in Anchorage, AK, on September 30, 2010.
Michael A. Tarr,
Manager, Alaska Flight Services Information Area Group.
[FR Doc. 2010-25478 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49463-49464]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20262]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC11-101-000.
    Applicants: Rumford Paper Company, Rumford Falls Hydro LLC.
    Description: Application under Section 203 of the FPA of Rumford
Paper Company and Rumford Falls Hydro LLC for the return of certain
jointly owned electrical delivery facilities.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110803-5063.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 24, 2011.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4195-000.
    Applicants: Puget Sound Energy, Inc.
    Description: Puget Sound Energy, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.1: Rate Schedule No. 94 to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110803-5000.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4196-000.
    Applicants: Michigan Electric Transmission Company, Midwest
Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Michigan Electric Transmission Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): METC-Gratiot County Wind E&P to be
effective 10/3/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110803-5013.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4197-000.
    Applicants: Michigan Electric Transmission Company, LLC, Midwest
Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Michigan Electric Transmission Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): METC-Lowell Light and Power IFA to
be effective 10/3/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110803-5014.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4198-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.,
ITC Midwest LLC.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): ITC Midwest-Lost Lakes E&P
to be effective 10/3/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110803-5015.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4199-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.,
ITC Midwest LLC.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.

submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): ITCM-City of Jackson IA to
be effective 10/3/2011.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110803-5016.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4202-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Nevada Power Company cancellation of FERC Electric
Rate Schedule No. 22.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110803-5057.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4203-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Nevada Power Company cancellation of FERC Electric
Rate Schedule No. 21.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110803-5058.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4204-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Nevada Power Company Cancellation of FERC Electric
Rate Schedule No. 35.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110803-5059.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4205-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Nevada Power Company Cancellation of FERC Electric
Rate Schedule No. 30.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110803-5060.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4206-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Nevada Power Company Cancellation of FERC Electric
Rate Schedule No. 15.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110803-5062.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4207-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Nevada Power Company cancellation of FERC Electric
Rate Schedule No. 23.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110803-5068.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4208-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Nevada Power Company cancellation of FERC Electric
Rate Schedule No. 26.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110803-5069.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4209-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Nevada Power Company cancellation of FERC Electric
Rate Schedule No. 25.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110803-5070.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4210-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Nevada Power Company Cancellation of FERC Electric
Rate Schedule No. 47.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110803-5071.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4211-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Nevada Power Company Cancellation of FERC Electric
Rate Schedule No. 37.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110803-5074.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 24, 2011.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 3, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-20262 Filed 8-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 83 (Monday, May 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23359-23360]
[FR Doc No: 2021-09244]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OGC-2021-0304; FRL-10023-23-OGC]

Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed consent decree; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Clean Air Act, as amended (CAA or the
Act), notice is given of a proposed consent decree in Center for
Biological Diversity v. Regan, No. 3:20-cv-06020-WHA (N.D. Cal.). On
August 27, 2020, Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity and Center
for Environmental Health (collectively, Plaintiffs) filed a complaint
in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
California, San Francisco Division. On January 22, 2021, Plaintiffs
filed an amended complaint. Plaintiffs alleged that the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) failed to perform certain non-
discretionary duties in accordance with the Act to timely respond to
numerous state implementation plan (SIP) and control techniques
guideline (CTG) submissions from the State of California and State of
Colorado and to timely issue a federal implementation plan (FIP) to
address specific CAA requirements for one particular area within
California. The proposed consent decree would establish deadlines for
EPA to act on certain submissions or, as an alternative for one area in
California, to issue a FIP.

DATES: Written comments on the proposed consent decree must be received
by June 2, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OGC-2021-0304, online at https://www.regulations.gov (EPA's preferred
method). Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
number for this action. Comments received may be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Additional Information
about Commenting on the Proposed Consent Decree'' heading under the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. Out of an abundance
of caution for members of the public and our staff, the EPA Docket
Center and Reading Room are closed to the public, with limited
exceptions, to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID-19. Our Docket
Center staff will continue to provide remote customer service via
email, phone, and webform. We encourage the public to submit comments
via https://www.regulations.gov, as there may be a delay in processing
mail and faxes. Hand-deliveries and couriers may be received by
scheduled appointment only. For further information on EPA Docket
Center services and the current status, please visit us online at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    EPA continues to carefully and continuously monitor information
from the CDC, local area health departments, and our federal partners
so that we can respond rapidly as conditions change regarding COVID-19.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Pettit, Air and Radiation
Law Office (7313K), Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Obtaining a Copy of the Proposed Consent Decree

    The official public docket for this action (identified by Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2021-0304) contains a copy of the proposed consent
decree.
    The electronic version of the public docket for this action
contains a copy of the proposed consent decree and is available through
https://www.regulations.gov. You may use https://www.regulations.gov to
submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the
contents of the official public docket, and access those documents in
the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, key in the appropriate docket identification number then select
``search.''

II. Additional Information about the Proposed Consent Decree

    The proposed consent decree would establish deadlines for EPA to
take action pursuant to CAA section 110(k) on certain SIP submissions
by the State of California and State of Colorado, or, as an alternative
for one area in California, to issue a FIP. First, on November 15,
2016, the State of California made a SIP submission to EPA intended as
a revision to the Mendocino County Air Quality Management District
portion of the California SIP. EPA issued a limited disapproval and
limited approval of the permitting rule, Rule 1-220, New Source Review
Standards, on July 3, 2017 (82 FR 30770). The proposed consent decree
would require EPA to correct deficiencies from the limited disapproval
by taking action to approve a SIP submission, promulgate a FIP, or
issue a combination of a partial SIP approval and partial FIP by
December 15, 2021.
    Second, on August 9, 2017, October 25, 2017, and May 23, 2018,
California made three SIP submissions or revisions for the Eastern Kern
(Kern County), California nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The proposed consent
decree would require EPA to take action on certain elements of the
three submissions by December 15, 2021, February 18, 2022, and December
15, 2022.
    Third, on May 31, 2017 and May 8, 2019, Colorado made SIP
submissions for the Denver Metro/North Front Range, Colorado
nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The proposed consent
decree would require EPA to take action on certain elements of the
submissions by February 15, 2023.
    Fourth, on December 7, 2018, California made a SIP submission for
the Nevada County (Western part), California nonattainment area portion
of the California SIP for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The proposed consent
decree would require EPA to take action on certain elements of the
submission by March 31, 2022.
    Fifth, on April 27, 2017 and May 5, 2017, California made SIP
submissions for the Riverside County (Coachella Valley planning area),
California nonattainment area portion of the California SIP for the
2008 ozone NAAQS. The proposed consent decree would require EPA to take
action on certain elements of the submissions by September 30, 2022.

    Additionally, during the pendency of this litigation, in the
ordinary course of its administrative action, EPA has taken final
action on some of the SIP submissions originally at issue in the
litigation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See, for example, 86 FR 11125 (February 24, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with section 113(g) of the CAA, for a period of
thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this document,
the Agency will accept written comments relating to the proposed
consent decree. EPA or the Department of Justice may withdraw or
withhold consent to the proposed consent decree if the comments
disclose facts or considerations that indicate that such consent is
inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the
requirements of the Act.

III. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Consent
Decree

    Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2021-
0304, via https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from this docket. EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not submit to EPA's docket at https://www.regulations.gov any information you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must
be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered
the official comment and should include discussion of all points you
wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. For additional information about submitting information
identified as CBI, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. Note that written
comments containing CBI and submitted by mail may be delayed and
deliveries or couriers will be received by scheduled appointment only.
    If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other
contact information in the body of your comment. This ensures that you
can be identified as the submitter of the comment and allows EPA to
contact you in case EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties or needs further information on the substance of your
comment. Any identifying or contact information provided in the body of
a comment will be included as part of the comment that is placed in the
official public docket and made available in EPA's electronic public
docket. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment.
    Use of the https://www.regulations.gov website to submit comments
to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments.
The electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, email address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
    Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late
comments.

Gautam Srinivasan,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2021-09244 Filed 4-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: April 6, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 64)]
[Notices]
[Page 15477]
[DOCID:fr06ap09-63]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-762-000]

Power Resources, Ltd.; Notice of Filing

March 30, 2009.
    Take notice that, on March 26, 2009, Power Resources, Ltd. filed an
amendment to its filing in the above captioned docket with information
required under the Commission's regulations. Such filing served to
reset the filing date in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 16, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-7573 Filed 4-3-09; 8:45 am]


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 11, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44125-44126]
[FR Doc No: 2023-14651]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OLEM-2018-0367; FRL-10984-01-OLEM]

Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request;
Underground Storage Tanks: Technical and Financial Requirements, and
State Program Approval Procedures (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is planning to submit an
information collection request (ICR), ``Underground Storage Tanks:
Technical and Financial Requirements, and State Program Approval
Procedures (Renewal)'' (EPA ICR No. 1360.18, OMB Control No. 2050-0068)
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). Before doing so, EPA
is soliciting public comments on specific aspects of the proposed
information collection as described below. This is a proposed extension
of the ICR, which is currently approved through April 30, 2024. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before September 11, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OLEM-
2018-0367 online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method) or by
mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code
28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other

information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
    Supporting documents which explain in detail the information that
the EPA will be collecting are available in the public docket for this
ICR. The docket can be viewed online at www.regulations.gov or in
person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone number for the Docket Center is
202-566-1744. For additional information about EPA's public docket,
visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth McDermott, Office of
Underground Storage Tanks, Mail Code 5401T, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA
(44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), EPA is soliciting comments and information
to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (iii) enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(iv) minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. EPA will consider the comments received and
amend the ICR as appropriate. The final ICR package will then be
submitted to OMB for review and approval. At that time, EPA will issue
another Federal Register notice to announce the submission of the ICR
to OMB and the opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB.
    Abstract: Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA), as amended, requires that EPA develop standards for Underground
Storage Tank (UST) systems, as may be necessary, to protect human
health and the environment, and procedures for approving state programs
in lieu of the Federal program. EPA promulgated technical and financial
requirements for owners and operators of USTs at 40 CFR part 280, and
state program approval procedures at 40 CFR part 281. This ICR is a
comprehensive presentation of all information collection requirements
contained at 40 CFR parts 280 and 281.
    The data collected for new and existing UST system operations and
financial requirements are used by owners and operators and/or EPA or
the implementing agency to monitor results of testing, inspections, and
operation of UST systems, as well as to demonstrate compliance with
regulations. EPA believes strongly that if the minimum requirements
specified under the regulations are not met, neither the facilities nor
EPA can ensure that UST systems are being managed in a manner
protective of human health and the environment.
    EPA uses state program applications to determine whether to approve
a state program. Before granting approval, EPA must determine that
programs will be no less stringent than the Federal program and contain
adequate enforcement mechanisms.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Facilities that own and operate
underground storage tanks (USTs), states that implement the UST
programs, and tribes.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 280).
    Estimated number of respondents: 196,483.
    Frequency of response: Once, on occasion, annual.
    Total estimated burden: 8,332,870 hours (per year). Burden is
defined at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $689,740,286 (per year), includes
$406,057,091 annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is a decrease of 389,322 hours in the
total estimated respondent burden hours compared with the ICR currently
approved by OMB. There is a total decrease in burden hours because the
overall number of underground storage tanks decreased while the
requirements for each tank owner remained the same. In addition, during
the last ICR EPA approved thirty states for state program approval but
only expects to approve 12 during this ICR.

Mark Barolo,
Director, Office of Underground Storage Tanks.
[FR Doc. 2023-14651 Filed 7-10-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P