[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 134 (Monday, July 14, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40642-40644]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16350]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2014-0536]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Water Ski Show, Fox River, Green Bay, WI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
Fox River in Green Bay, WI. This safety zone is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of the Fox River due to a water ski show. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to protect the surrounding public
and vessels from the hazards associated with the water ski show.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from July 14, 2014
until 7:30 p.m. August 27, 2014. For the purposes of enforcement,
actual notice will be used from 6 p.m. July 9, 2014, until July 14,
2014. The eight specific July and August dates of enforcement are
listed below in this rule.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2014-0536. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, contact or email MST1 Joseph McCollum, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Lake Michigan, at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If
you have questions on viewing the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 1-800-647-5527.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule

A. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking with
respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. The final details for this event were
not known to the Coast Guard until there was insufficient time
remaining before the event to publish an NPRM. Thus, delaying the
effective date of this rule to wait for a comment period to run would
be both impracticable and contrary to the public interest because it
would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect spectators and
vessels from the hazards associated with a water ski show, which are
discussed further below.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this temporary rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons discussed in
the preceding paragraph, waiting for a 30 day notice period to run
would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for this rule is the Coast Guard's authority to
establish safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
    For 4 days in July and 4 days in August, 2014, the Coast Guard
anticipates that a ski team will perform two 30-minute shows on the Fox
River between the Main Street Bridge and the West Walnut Street Bridge
in Green Bay, WI. These water ski shows will consist of 25 participants
and three boats, operating within the main channel of the Fox River.
The Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, has determined that these water
ski shows will pose a significant risk to public safety and property.
Such hazards include collisions among the water ski show participant
vessels and passing traffic on the Fox River.

C. Discussion of the Final Rule

    With the aforementioned hazards in mind, the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan, has determined that this temporary safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of spectators and vessels during the
water ski shows in Green Bay, WI. This rule is effective from July 9,
2014 until August 27, 2014. This rule will be enforced from 6 p.m.
until 6:30 p.m., and again from 7 p.m. until 7:30 p.m. on each day of
July 9, 16, 23, 30, and August 6, 13, 20, and 27, 2014. The safety zone
will encompass all waters of the Fox River in Green Bay, WI from the
Main Street Bridge in position 44[deg]31'5.7'' N 088[deg]0' 54.7'' W to
the West Walnut Street Bridge in position 44[deg]30'54.3'' N
088[deg]1'5.3'' W (NAD 83).
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan,
or her designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or
her designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. It is not
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of

the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
    We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy,
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel
legal or policy issues. The safety zone created by this rule will only
impact a small area and enforced for only 30-minute intervals on 4 days
in July and 4 days in August, 2014. Under certain conditions, moreover,
vessels may still transit through the safety zone when permitted by the
Captain of the Port or her designated on-scene representative.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this temporary rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending
to transit or anchor in a portion of Fox River during the times that
this zone is enforced in July and August, 2014.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the reasons cited in the
Regulatory Planning and Review section. Additionally, before the
enforcement of the zone, we would issue local Broadcast Notice to
Mariners so vessel owners and operators can plan accordingly.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone and,
therefore it is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0536 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T09-0536  Safety Zone; Water Ski Show, Fox River, Green Bay,
WI.

    (a) Location. All waters of the Fox River in Green Bay, WI from the
Main Street Bridge in position 44[deg]31'5.7'' N 88[deg]0'54.7'' W to
the West Walnut Street Bridge in position 44[deg]30'54.3'' N 088[deg]1'
5.3'' W (NAD 83).
    (b) Effective and enforcement periods. This section is effective
from July 9, 2014, until 7:30 p.m. August 27, 2014. This rule will be
enforced from 6 p.m. until 6:30 p.m., and again from 7 p.m. until 7:30
p.m. on each day of July 9, 16, 23, 30, and August 6, 13, 20, and 27,
2014.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan or her designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or her
designated on-scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been designated by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan to
act on her behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or her on-
scene representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan or her on-scene representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate
in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her on-scene representative.

    Dated: June 30, 2014.
A.B. Cocanour,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2014-16350 Filed 7-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6729-6731]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02401]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2014-N-1168]

Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012; September 2014 Public
Hearing on Policy Development; Reopening of Docket; Request for
Comments

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; reopening of docket; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
reopening of the docket to solicit public comment on certain topics
related to implementation of the Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of
2012 (GDUFA) and the GDUFA Commitment Letter that accompanies the
legislation. A public hearing in September 2014 provided an opportunity
for public input on future

policy priorities. FDA is seeking additional written comments from all
interested parties, including, but not limited to, regulated industry,
consumers, patients, caregivers, health care professionals, and patient
groups.

DATES: Submit electronic or written comments by March 9, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Giaquinto, Office of Generic
Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg 75, Rm. 1670, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98-417) (the Hatch-Waxman Amendments) amended the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act). The Hatch-Waxman
Amendments created section 505(j) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)),
which established the abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) approval
pathway, which allows lower-priced generic versions of previously
approved innovator drugs to be approved and marketed.
    On July 9, 2012, GDUFA was signed into law by the President to help
speed the delivery of safe and effective generic drugs to the public
and to reduce costs to industry. Under GDUFA, FDA agreed to certain
obligations as laid out in the GDUFA Commitment Letter that accompanies
the legislation.\1\ To support these obligations, FDA is developing
numerous guidance documents. At the time of the September 2014 public
hearing, FDA had developed the following draft guidances for industry:
\2\

    \1\ See Generic Drug User Fee Act Program Performance Goals and
Procedures (GDUFA Commitment Letter) for fiscal years 2013 through
2017, available at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/UserFees/GenericDrugUserFees/UCM282505.pdf).
    \2\ The draft guidance documents referenced in this document are
available on the FDA Drugs guidance Web page at http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 ``ANDA Submissions--Content and Format of Abbreviated New Drug
Applications''
 ``ANDA Submissions--Refuse to Receive for Lack of Proper
Justification of Impurity Limits''
 ``ANDA Submissions--Amendments and Easily Correctable
Deficiencies Under GDUFA''
 ``ANDA Submissions--Prior Approval Supplements Under GDUFA''
 ``Controlled Correspondence Related to Generic Drug
Development''

II. Purpose and Scope of the September 2014 Public Hearing

A. GDUFA Implementation: Draft Guidance Documents

    The purpose of the public hearing was to: (1) Solicit public
comment on the five draft guidance documents described in section I
that FDA had issued to facilitate implementation of GDUFA and (2)
recommend future policy priorities, including recommendations for
additional guidance topics to facilitate GDUFA implementation. We
continue to solicit comments from interested members of the public,
including industry, consumers, patient groups, caregivers, and health
care professionals, on the following topics related to GDUFA
implementation guidances:
     Are there comments on the five guidances described in
section I?
     Are there GDUFA implementation issues related to the five
draft guidances described in section I that have not been addressed?
     What other GDUFA implementation topics need the
development of guidance?
     Are there any topics or issues related to generic drug
development other than those related to GDUFA implementation that need
the development of guidance?

B. GDUFA Implementation Related to Generic Drug Exclusivity

    Another purpose of the hearing was to solicit feedback on issues
that may arise in FDA's consideration of 180-day exclusivity provided
for in section 505(j)(5)(B)(iv) of the FD&C Act.
    Timing of ANDA approval is directly affected by an applicant's
eligibility for 180-day exclusivity, and thus FDA's consideration of
any issues related to 180-day exclusivity is a component of approval
actions. FDA decisions regarding 180-day exclusivity are fact-specific,
and the facts that have the potential to determine eligibility for
exclusivity may shift up to the time when an ANDA that is eligible for
180-day exclusivity, or another ANDA referencing the same listed drug,
is ready for approval.
    With the enactment of GDUFA, FDA will take actions on pending
applications consistent with the timeframes agreed upon in the GDUFA
Commitment Letter. During the hearing, we sought input on possible
processes FDA might introduce under GDUFA for making determinations on
180-day exclusivity, as described in the following questions:
     Should FDA's consideration of eligibility for 180-day
exclusivity for a specific drug product be a public process, including
consideration of whether a first applicant has forfeited its
eligibility for exclusivity under section 505(j)(5)(D) of the FD&C Act?
If a public process is advisable, would it be so in all instances, or
is there a subset of circumstances in which the process should be
public? Also, what administrative mechanisms would best facilitate such
a process?
     Legal challenges to FDA's decisions on 180-day exclusivity
often must be resolved on an expedited basis that can be inconvenient
for the parties and the court. What legal or regulatory mechanisms, if
any, are available to better facilitate FDA's determination of and
orderly resolution of sponsors' challenges to 180-day exclusivity
determinations?
     Are there other topics related to 180-day exclusivity on
which you would like to comment?
     Are there topics related to 180-day exclusivity that would
benefit from FDA guidance?
    We continue to seek comment on these topics. When submitting input
on the questions provided in this notice, we encourage commenters to
consider FDA's statutory and regulatory authorities, including any
restrictions on FDA's authority to disclose certain information related
to unapproved ANDAs.

C. GDUFA Implementation and Potential First Generics

    At the public hearing, we also sought comment on meeting the goals
of the GDUFA Commitment Letter with regard to the ``first generics''
review prioritization category. Subsequent to that hearing, the Agency
opened a separate, dedicated docket, Docket No. FDA-2014-N-1741,
seeking comment on ``first generic'' criteria, as described in the
Federal Register notice ``Proposed Criteria for `First Generic'
Submissions for Purposes of Abbreviated New Drug Application Review
Prioritization Under the Generic Drug User Fee Amendments;
Establishment of a Public Docket.'' This

docket opened on November 19, 2014, and closed on December 19, 2014. We
are no longer seeking comment on the ``first generic'' review
prioritization category at this time.

III. How To Submit Comments

    Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to http://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: February 2, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-02401 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 91 (Friday, May 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22141-22142]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09672]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP17-730-000.
    Applicants: Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Par.
    Description: Operational Purchases and Sales Report of Great Lakes
Gas Transmission LP.
    Filed Date: 05/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170501-5456.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, May 15, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-731-000.
    Applicants: Blue Lake Gas Storage Company.
    Description: Operational Purchases and Sales Report of Blue Lake
Gas Storage Company.
    Filed Date: 05/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170501-5457.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, May 15, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-732-000.
    Applicants: Bison Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Operational Purchases and Sales Report of Bison
Pipeline LLC.
    Filed Date: 05/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170501-5458.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, May 15, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-733-000.
    Applicants: ANR Storage Company.
    Description: Operational Purchases and Sales Report of ANR Storage
Company.
    Filed Date: 05/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170501-5459.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, May 15, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-734-000.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: Operational Purchases and Sales Report of ANR Pipeline
Company.
    Filed Date: 05/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170501-5460.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, May 15, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-735-000.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: Annual Cashout Surcharge Report of ANR Storage
Company.
    Filed Date: 05/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170501-5461.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, May 15, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-736-000.
    Applicants: Northern Border Pipeline Company.
    Description: Operational Purchases and Sales Report of Northern
Border Pipeline Company.
    Filed Date: 05/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170501-5471.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, May 15, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP16-975-001.
    Applicants: Venice Gathering System, L.L.C.
    Description: Venice Gathering System, L.L.C. submits tariff filing
per 385.602: Motion to Place Interim Settlement Rates Into Effect to be
effective 6/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 05/05/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170505-5084.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, May 17, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-724-000.
    Applicants: Venice Gathering System, L.L.C.

    Description: Venice Gathering System, L.L.C. submits tariff filing
per 154.205(a): Motion to Withdraw Filing.
    Filed Date: 05/05/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170505-5170.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, May 17, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-737-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Equitrans, L.P. submits tariff filing per 154.204:
Equitrans' Clean-Up Filing--May 2017 to be effective 6/5/2017.
    Filed Date: 05/05/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170505-5026.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, May 17, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-738-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.203: Refund Report--Texas Eastern OFO Penalty
Disbursment (Rate Schedule S-2).
    Filed Date: 05/05/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170505-5041.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, May 17, 2017.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 8, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-09672 Filed 5-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P