[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 189 (Thursday, September 29, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66872-66874]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23085]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-9113; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-042-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Defense and Space S.A. (Formerly
Known as Construcciones Aeronauticas, S.A.) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Defense and Space S.A. (formerly known as Construcciones
Aeronauticas, S.A.) Model CN-235, CN 235-100, CN 235-200, and CN 235-
300 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of cracks in
certain areas of the rear fuselage. This proposed AD would require
repetitive borescope and detailed visual inspections of the rear
fuselage lateral beam and its external area and repair if necessary. We
are proposing this AD to detect and correct cracks in the rear fuselage
lateral beam and its external area; such cracking could lead to failure
of the affected components, and result in reduced structural integrity
of the fuselage.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 14,
2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Airbus
Defence and Space, Services/Engineering Support, Avenida de
Arag[oacute]n 404, 28022 Madrid, Spain; telephone +34 91 585 55 84; fax
+34 91 585 31 27; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>You may view
this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9113; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-9113;
Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-042-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.

    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued
Airworthiness Directive 2016-0064, dated April 04, 2016 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for certain Airbus
Defense and Space S.A. Model CN-235, CN-235-100, CN-235-200, and CN-
235-300 airplanes. The MCAI states:

    During a scheduled visual inspection accomplished in accordance
with the CN-235 Maintenance Review Board (MRB) Document task 53.160,
cracking was found, affecting the rear fuselage lateral beam, both
left hand (LH) and right hand (RH) sides. The investigation to
determine the cause of these cracks is on-going.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to
failure of the affected components, resulting in reduced structural
integrity of the fuselage.
    To address this potential unsafe condition, Airbus Defence and
Space (D&S) issued Alert Operator Transmission (AOT) AOT-CN235-53-
0002 Revision 1 (hereafter referred to as `the AOT' in this AD) to
provide inspection instructions.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires
repetitive inspections [special detailed inspection with a borescope
and detailed visual] of the rear fuselage lateral beam and its
external area and, depending on findings, [cracks or discrepancies],
accomplishment of applicable corrective action(s) [repair].

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9113.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Airbus Defense and Space Alert Operators Transmission
(AOT), AOT-CN235-53-0002, Revision 1, dated September 17, 2015. This
service information describes repetitive borescope and detailed visual
inspection requirements for the rear fuselage lateral beam and its
external area. This service information is reasonably available because
the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 13 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
               Action                         Labor cost            Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection.........................  2 work-hours x $85 per hour               0            $170          $2,210
                                      = $170.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Airbus Defense and Space S.A. (Formerly Known as Construcciones
Aeronauticas, S.A.): Docket No. FAA-2016-9113; Directorate
Identifier 2016-NM-042-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by November 14, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus Defense and Space S.A. (formerly known
as Construcciones Aeronauticas, S.A.) Model CN-235, CN-235-100, CN-
235-200, and CN-235-300 airplanes, certificated in any category, all
manufacturer serial numbers.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of cracks in certain areas of
the rear fuselage. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
cracks in the rear fuselage lateral beam and its external area; such
cracking could lead to failure of the affected components, and
result in reduced structural integrity of the fuselage.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Repetitive Inspections on the Fuselage Lateral Beam

    Within the compliance time specified in Table 1 to paragraph (g)
of this AD and, thereafter, at intervals not to exceed the values
specified in Table 2 to paragraph (g) of this AD, as applicable to
airplane model, accomplish the inspections as specified in
paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, in accordance with the
instructions of Airbus Defense and Space Alert Operators
Transmission (AOT) AOT-CN235-53-0002, Revision 1, dated September
17, 2015.
    (1) A special detailed inspection for cracks and other
discrepancies with a borescope of the rear fuselage lateral beam
between Frame (FR) 31 and FR45, left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH)
side.
    (2) A detailed visual inspection for cracks and other
discrepancies of the external area of the rear fuselage lateral
beam, LH and RH side.

 Table 1 to Paragraph (g) of This AD--Initial Inspection Compliance Time
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     A or B, whichever occurs later
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A....................  Before exceeding 15,000 flight cycles or 15,000
                        flight hours, whichever occurs first since
                        airplane first flight.
B....................  Within 50 flight cycles or 50 flight hours
                        whichever occurs first after the effective date
                        of this AD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                      Table 2 to Paragraph (g) of This AD--Repetitive Inspection Intervals
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Repetitive interval (whichever occurs first, flight cycles or flight
            Airplane models                                               hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model CN-235 and CN-235-100 airplanes..  3,600 flight cycles or 3,100 flight hours.
Model CN-235-200 airplanes.............  3,600 flight cycles or 2,800 flight hours.
Model CN-235-300 airplanes.............  15,000 flight cycles or 15,000 flight hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(h) Repair

    If any crack or discrepancy is found during any inspection
required by paragraph (g) of this AD: Before further flight, contact
and obtain repair instructions from Airbus Defense and Space S.A. in
accordance with paragraph (k)(2) of this AD, and within the
compliance time indicated in those instructions, accomplish the
repair accordingly, including any post-repair maintenance task(s),
as applicable.

(i) Continued Inspection of Repaired Areas

    Accomplishment of a repair on an airplane, as required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, does not constitute terminating action for
the repetitive inspections as required by paragraph (g) of this AD
for that airplane, unless specified in the applicable repair
instructions obtained in paragraph (h).

(j) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD, using Airbus Defense and Space
AOT AOT-CN235-53-0002, dated August 28, 2015.

(k) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Shahram
Daneshmandi, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or
Airbus Defense and Space S.A.'s EASA Design Organization Approval
(DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-
authorized signature.

(l) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2016-0064, dated April 04, 2016,
for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on
the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2016-9113.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact EADS-
CASA, Military Transport Aircraft Division (MTAD), Integrated
Customer Services (ICS), Technical Services, Avenida de
Arag[oacute]n 404, 28022 Madrid, Spain; telephone +34 91 585 55 84;
fax +34 91 585 55 05; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.eads.net. You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 16, 2016.
Suzanne Masterson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-23085 Filed 9-28-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule Child Lead Benefits, Weighted Estimates ( Final Option: Post Stratification Extrapolation) Category Type Reduced Cases Annual Benefits ( 2001$) Neo Natal Mortality Sport 0.0000 $ 0.00 Neo Natal Mortality Sub 0.0000 $ 0.00 Avoided IQ Loss Sport 0.0000 $ 0.00 Avoided IQ Loss Sub 0.0000 $ 0.00 Reduced IQ < 70 Sport 0.0000 $ 0.00 Reduced IQ < 70 Sub 0.0000 $ 0.00 Reduced Pb > 20 Sport 0.0000 $ 0.00 Reduced Pb > 20 Sub 0.0000 $ 0.00 Total $ 0.00 February 14, 2002 Page 1 of 1 exlchld. xls  Child Lead


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 27, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30182-30183]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12567]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2015-1481; Airspace Docket No. 15-AWP-1]

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Santa Rosa, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface at the Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma
County Airport, Santa Rosa, CA. The FAA found modification of the
airspace area above 1,200 feet is no longer needed for standard
instrument approach procedures at the airport. This action is necessary
for the safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR)
operations at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 13, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2015-
1481; Airspace Docket No. 15-AWP-1, at the beginning of your comments.
You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in
the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 1-800-
647-5527), is on the ground floor of the building at the above address.
    FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. The Order is also available for inspection
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this proposed incorporation by
reference material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15. For further
information, you can contact the Airspace Policy and Regulations Group,
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob Riedl, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped

postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket
No. FAA-2015-1481/Airspace Docket No. 15-AWP-1.'' The postcard will be
date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Center, Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

Availability and Summary of Documents Proposed for Incorporation by
Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2014, and effective
September 15, 2014. FAA Order 7400.9Y is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this proposed rule. FAA Order 7400.9Y lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by modifying Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface at Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma
County Airport, Santa Rosa, CA. After a review of the airspace, the FAA
found removal of the airspace above 1,200 feet AGL necessary as this
airspace is no longer required for standard instrument approach
procedures at the airport.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.9Y, dated August 6, 2014, and effective September 15,
2014, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.
    The FAA has determined this proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since
this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified this proposed rule, when
promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106, describes
the authority for the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend controlled airspace at Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma
County Airport, Santa Rosa, CA.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Y,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2014, and
effective September 15, 2014, as amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

AWP CA E5 Santa Rosa, CA [Amended]

Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County Airport, CA
    (Lat. 38[deg]30'35'' N., long. 122[deg]48'46'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
bounded by a line beginning at lat. 38[deg]53'25'' N., long.
122[deg]52'34'' W.; to lat. 38[deg]37'07'' N., long. 122[deg]
46'02'' W.; to lat. 38[deg]22'08'' N., long. 122[deg]38'28'' W.; to
lat. 38[deg]06'41'' N., long. 122[deg]29'59'' W.; to lat.
38[deg]02'10'' N., long. 122[deg]44'09'' W.; to lat. 38[deg]17'57''
N., long. 122[deg]54'37'' W.; to lat. 38[deg]22'58'' N., long.
123[deg]02'34'' W.; lat. 38[deg]29'12'' N., long. 122[deg]56'32''
W.; lat. 38[deg]33'48'' N., long. 123[deg]00'47'' W.; lat.
38[deg]50'14'' N., long. 123[deg]07'20'' W.; thence to the point of
origin.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on May 14, 2015.
Christopher Ramirez,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2015-12567 Filed 5-26-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P