FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 1 of 52 Metal Molding and Casting ( 40 CFR 464) Detailed Investigation for 2004/ 2005 Planning Process Executive Summary During the Screening Level Review phase of the 2004/ 2005 planning process, metal molding and casting was one of eight industrial categories identified solely through Factor 4 concerns. Issues driving the concerns include: 1) discharges of phenol, 2) changes to the industry since the guidelines were promulgated, 3) applicability to aluminum die casters, and 4) discrepancies between limits set for these guidelines and those set for the same pollutants by the guidelines for metal finishing. Based on information reported to the Toxic Release Inventory ( TRI) and the Permit Compliance System ( PCS), toxic discharges from metal molding and casting facilities are low relative to other industrial categories. In addition, generally, a few facilities drive the toxic weighted pound equivalent ( TWPE) loading estimates from both TRI and PCS.

The information in the record at this time does not support a decision to revise these effluent guidelines. In the event that stakeholders provide additional data and supporting information during subsequent review cycles, EPA will reevaluate them at that time. In the absence of revisions to the effluent guidelines, these concerns could be addressed through improved information dissemination and outreach by EPA. This could include the development of a fact sheet with answers to frequently asked questions ( FAQs), including the names of current contacts within the Office of Water. The Agency could announce the availability of this fact sheet at the regular meetings for permit writers and pretreatment coordinators held by the Office of Wastewater Management ( OWM) and through internet postings and email alerts to the Engineering and Analysis Division ( EAD) stakeholders mailing list. To explore the concern about the limits for phenol, EPA could confirm whether smaller aluminum casters were evaluated during guideline development. If in fact they were not considered in depth, EPA could then solicit data from the respondents or the facilities they identify in order to verify and clarify the issue. Any information received through this research effort could be considered during a subsequent planning cycle. Finally, due to the relatively small number of facilities discharging the bulk of the TWPE, EPA could also provide assistance to permit writers in preparing permits based on best professional judgment ( BPJ).

Overview This report presents information for the following topics: Background Industry and Related Subcategories Wastewater Characteristics and Pollutant Sources Pollutants Discharged FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 2 of 52 Treatment Technology and Pollution Prevention Concerns Identified Pre Proposal Concerns Identified in Comments to Proposal Additional Concerns Identified Post Proposal Followup Contacts Possible Solutions Attachments provide the following supporting information: EPA Databases and References Used in this Review Point Source Categories Identified Solely Through Factor 4 Guidelines Applicability and Regulatory History PCS Discharges TRI Discharges Reported Pollutant Loadings Background In preparation for proposing the Preliminary Effluent Guidelines Program Plan for 2004/ 2005 (" Preliminary Plan," published in February 2004), EPA analyzed four factors identified in the draft " National Strategy for Industrial Clean Water"( Edocket OW 2003 0074 0215). See Attachment A for more background about the 304( m) planning Process. The four factors focus on: 1 Potential impacts to human health and the environment. Preliminary results are summarized in the " Factor 1 Analysis: Human Health and Environmental Impacts   Status of Screening Level Review Phase" ( Edocket OW 2003 0074 0410). 2 Identification of an applicable and demonstrated technology, process change, or pollution prevention alternative that can effectively reduce pollutants discharged. Preliminary results are summarized in the " Factor 2 Analysis: Technology Advances and Process Changes   Status of Screening Level Review Phase." ( Edocket OW 2003 0074 0287). 3 Evaluation of the cost, performance, and affordability of the technology, process change, or pollution prevention measures identified using the second factor. 4 Implementation and efficiency concerns. Preliminary results are presented in the " Factor 4 Analysis: Implementation and Efficiency Considerations   Status of Screening Level Review Phase" ( Edocket OW 2003 0074 0329)

When all of the results were integrated prior to proposing the Preliminary Plan, EPA determined that 8 point source categories with existing effluent guidelines had been identified solely through Factor 4 concerns. ( See list in the Attachment B.) In order to determine the best course of action to address these concerns, EPA performed an analysis of issues and potential solutions for each of the 8 categories. The results of that analysis for Metal Molding and Casting are presented in this report. FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 3 of 52 Industry and Related Subcategories The Metal Molding and Casting point source category is regulated at 40 CFR Part 464. See Attachment C for the applicability and regulatory background. This point source category includes facilities reporting under Standard Industrial Classification ( SIC) industry group 33: Primary Metal Industries, and the subgroups 332: Iron and Steel Foundries and 336: Nonferrous Foundries. Specifically, it includes SIC 3321 ( Gray and Ductile Iron Foundries), 3325 ( Steel Foundries Not Elsewhere Classified), 3364 ( Nonferrous Die Castings, Except Aluminum), 3365 ( Aluminum Foundries), 3366 ( Copper Foundries), and 3369 ( Nonferrous Foundries Except Aluminum and Copper). No specific subcategories were identified during the Factor 4 analysis.

° SIC 3321  Gray and Ductile Iron Foundries Establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing gray and ductile iron castings, including cast iron pressure and soil pipes and fittings.

° SIC 3322  Malleable Iron Foundries Establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing malleable iron castings.

° SIC 3324  Steel Investment Foundries Establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing steel investment castings.

° SIC 3325  Steel Foundries, Not Elsewhere Classified Establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing steel castings, not elsewhere classified.

° SIC 3364  Nonferrous Die Castings, Except Aluminum Establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing nonferrous metal die castings, except aluminum.

° SIC 3365  Aluminum Foundries Establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing aluminum ( including alloys) castings, except die castings.

° SIC 3366  Copper Foundries Establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing copper ( including alloys) castings, except die castings.

° SIC 3369  Nonferrous Foundries, Except Aluminum and Copper Establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing nonferrous metal castings ( including alloys), except all die castings and other castings of aluminum or copper.

The following tables present the facilities in this category that report to the Permit Compliance System ( PCS) and to the Toxic Release Inventory ( TRI). ( Note: Since this industry ranked low during the screening phase, EPA did not verify any of the information reported to PCS and TRI, and has used it as reported. Although information in PCS and TRI is limited, it can provide insight into this industry. See Attachment A for more details about PCS and TRI.) Table 1 shows the number of facilities identified for this industry. Table 2 lists the facilities reporting to FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 4 of 52 PCS under these SIC codes. Table 3 lists the facilities reporting to TRI under these SIC codes. Attachments D and E list these facilities along with their reported discharges.

Table 1. Number of Facilities SIC 1997 Census PCS TRI Total Major Minor Total Reporters No reported discharge Direct discharge Indirect discharge Both direct & indirect 3321 669 31 4 27 200 137 28 22 13 3322 28 4 0 4 8 5 2 1 0 3324 159 2 0 2 43 23 3 10 7 3325 288 8 2 6 99 72 15 8 4 3364 279 6 0 6 20 14 0 6 0 3365 626 14 2 12 74 60 8 4 2 3366 312 0 0 0 72 49 10 8 5 3369 141 6 0 6 58 32 6 14 6 Source: PCSLoads2000, TRIReleases2000 Table 2. Metal Molding and Casting Facilities Reporting to PCS, Sorted by State SIC NPDES ID NAME CITY STATE 3321 IL0001830 CATERPILLAR INC. MAPLETON ( also reports to TRI) MAPLETON IL 3365 IN0003573 G. M. CORP. POWERTRAIN DIV. BEDFORD IN 3325 KY0100153 STEEL TECHNOLOGIES INC GHENT GHENT KY 3365 KY0001864 INVENSYS PRECISION DIE CASTING RUSSELLVILLE KY 3325 NJ0004049 FLOWSERVE CORP/ INGERSOLL RAND PHILLIPSBURG NJ 3321 OH0004901 BURNHAM CORPORATION ZANESVILLE OH 3321 OH0002666 GENERAL MOTORS CORP. DEFIANCE OH 3321 TX0001465 RANSOM INDUSTRIES LP TYLER TX Table 3. Metal Molding and Casting Facilities Reporting to TRI SIC Facility TRI ID Facility Name City State 3321 36201MHVLV605WE M & H VALVE CO. ANNISTON AL 3321 35023NTDST2023S UNITED STATES PIPE & FNDY. CO. BESSEMER AL 3321 36201SCSTN1831F U. S. PIPE & FNDY. CO. INC. U. S. CASTINGS DIV. ANNISTON AL SIC Facility TRI ID Facility Name City State FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 5 of 52 3324 36201STHRNHIGHW SOUTHERN TOOL INC. OXFORD AL 3324 36830VRMNT155AL VERMONT AMERICAN AUBURN AL 3325 35222THMSF900NO SVEDALA INDS. INC. THOMAS DIV. BIRMINGHAM AL 3325 35055MRCNL1725O AMERICAN ALLOY PRODS. INC. CULLMAN AL 3325 36605MBLPL905SO MOBILE PULLEY & MACHINE WORKS MOBILE AL 3365 35222STBRM831NO EAST BIRMINGHAM BRONZE FNDY. INC BIRMINGHAM AL 3365 35094SQRDC940MO ANDERSON ELECTRICAL PRODS. INC. LEEDS AL 3366 35215LBMCP1501R ALABAMA COPPER & BRONZE CO. INC. BIRMINGHAM AL 3366 36202LBRSSGOLDE LEE BRASS CO. ANNISTON AL 3369 35096LNCLNRAILR LINCOLN METALS CORP. LINCOLN AL 3366 72143MTTHW501LI MATTHEWS INTL. CORP. SEARCY AR 3324 85043DLPHN740SO DOLPHIN INC. PHOENIX AZ 3366 85714KNGHT420EA TUCSON FNDY. & MFG. INC. TUCSON AZ 3321 94587NTDST1295W U. S. PIPE & FNDY. CO. INC. UNION CITY CA 3321 92627GRSWL1701P GRISWOLD INDS. COSTA MESA CA 3324 91745TLDYN16800 TELEDYNE CAST PARTS INDUSTRY OPS. CITY OF INDUSTRY CA 3324 94577PRCSN414HE WYMAN GORDON CO. SAN LEANDRO CA 3365 90058LMNMC5151A PECHINEY CAST PLATE VERNON CA 3369 93277MNC00401EC EMI INC. VISALIA CA 3369 90280TCHNC11220 TECHNI CAST CORP. SOUTH GATE CA 3369 90032RRWHD5142A ARROWHEAD BRASS PRODS. INC. LOS ANGELES CA 3369 94590DGSSL403RY TIMET VALLEJO CA 3369 95037DGSSC16035 UNAXIS MATERIALS INC. MORGAN HILL CA 3369 80517RCKRB2050B RICKER BARTLETT INC. MICHAEL RICKER PEWTER ( DBA) ESTES PARK CO 3322 06786ZGDNYMAINS O Z/ GEDNEY L. L. C. TERRYVILLE CT 3365 06082YNKCS243SH YANKEE CASTING CO. INC. ENFIELD CT 3369 33634CHRML7030A CHROMALLOY CASTINGS TAMPA TAMPA FL 3321 30458GRNNLHIGHW ANVIL INTL. STATESBORO GA 3321 30828WHLND1117T WHELAND AUTOMOTIVE INDS. WARRENTON GA 3321 31995CLMBS1600N INTERMET COLUMBUS FNDY. INC. COLUMBUS GA 3321 51501GRFFN2601W GRIFFIN PIPE PRODS. CO. COUNCIL BLUFFS IA 3321 52577CLWVLOLDHW CLOW VALVE CO. FNDY. OSKALOOSA IA 3325 52722SVYRS225S3 SIVYER STEEL CORP. BETTENDORF IA 3321 61547CTRPL8826W CATERPILLAR INC. MAPLETON PLANT MAPLETON IL 3321 61605CTRPL2411W CATERPILLAR INC. SEAL RING MAPLETON IL 3321 62521WGNRC1275E INTERMET DECATUR FNDY. DECATUR IL 3324 60101FNSTL21NCH FANSTEEL ESCAST ADDISON IL 3325 62040MRCNS1700W AMERICAN STEEL FOUNDRIES GRANITE CITY IL 3364 60050LLDDC3923W ALLIED DIE CASTING CORP. MC HENRY IL 3366 60538RRNDS1002G AURORA METALS DIV. L. L. C. MONTGOMERY IL 3366 60005MGNCS1117E AMPCO METAL INC. ARLINGTON HTS IL 3369 62223CNTRY1300N CENTURY CASTINGS CORP. SWANSEA IL 3321 46580THDLTCORNE DALTON CORP. WARSAW IN 3321 46241CHRYS1100S INDIANAPOLIS FNDY. INDIANAPOLIS IN 3321 47374SLVCS2153W PERFECT CIRCLE DIV. DANA CORP. RICHMOND LINER FND RICHMOND IN 3321 46706BRNFN63563 AUBURN FNDY. INC. AUBURN IN 3321 47394MCCST900NM OMCO CAST METALS WINCHESTER IN SIC Facility TRI ID Facility Name City State FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 6 of 52 3321 47202CWCTX1616T GOLDEN CASTING CORP. COLUMBUS IN 3321 46706BRNFN2278C AUBURN FNDY. INC. PLANT # 2 AUBURN IN 3324 46580MDCST596EA MED CAST INC. WARSAW IN 3324 46350RMTLSPOBOX AERO METALS INC. LA PORTE IN 3325 47918HRRSN900MO HARRISON STEEL CASTINGS CO. ATTICA IN 3365 46721BHNPRUSHWY CITATION  BOHN ALUMINUM CORP. BUTLER IN 3369 46992THFRD775MA FORD METER BOX CO. INC. WABASH IN 3369 46350HWMTC1110E HOWMET CORP. LA PORTE IN 3325 66002RCKWL4THAN ATCHISON STEEL CASTING & MACHINING ATCHISON KS 3321 41008DYTNW5212H MERITOR HVBS CARROLLTON CASTING CENTER CARROLLTON KY 3321 41031GRDFNNEWLA GREDE FOUNDRIES INC. GREDE PERM CAST CYNTHIANA KY 3364 42420GMCPR11055 GAMCO PRODS. CO. HENDERSON KY 3365 42452KBLLYMCDON KB ALLOYS INC. ROBARDS KY 3325 02184WLLST205WO WOLLASTON ALLOYS INC. BRAINTREE MA 3321 48605SGNWG1629N GMC POWERTRAIN SAGINAW METAL CASTING OPS. SAGINAW MI 3321 48048NWHVN58391 NEW HAVEN FNDY. NEW HAVEN MI 3321 49431GRTLK800NW GREAT LAKES CASTINGS CORP. LUDINGTON MI 3321 49441CWCCS2672H TEXTRON AUTOMOTIVE FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS CWC DIV. MUSKEGON MI 3321 49601CMCST23010 HAYES LEMMERZ INTL. INC. CADILLAC INC. CADILLAC MI 3321 49224HRVRD601NO HAYES ALBION CORP. ALBION MI 3325 49441WSTMC1148W WEST MICHIGAN STEEL FNDY. MUSKEGON MI 3364 49502KLRBR236ST KEELER DIE CAST GRAND RAPIDS MI 3365 49247MTLLY103WM METALLOY CORP. HUDSON FNDY. DIV. HUDSON MI 3369 49461HWMTCONEMI HOWMET CORP. WHITEHALL CASTINGS WHITEHALL MI 3369 49461HWMTC3850W HOWMET CORP. PLANT 10 WHITEHALL MI 3369 49417GRNDH230NO GRAND HAVEN BRASS FNDY. GRAND HAVEN MI 3369 48823SPRRB4893D SUPERIOR BRASS & ALUMINUM CASTING CO. EAST LANSING MI 3369 49461HWMTC1600S HOWMET CORP. PLANT 5 WHITEHALL MI 3321 55413PRSPC1225W PROSPECT FNDY. INC. MINNEAPOLIS MN 3321 55746NRTHR555WE NORTHERN CASTINGS CORP. HIBBING MN 3321 56303MNTRN711AN GREDE  ST. CLOUD FNDY. INC. SAINT CLOUD MN 3325 55808MNTRN200EA M E INTL. DULUTH MN 3321 63448CPRFN700NO LAGRANGE FNDY. INC. LA GRANGE MO 3364 63456DMKRS801SE DIVERSIFIED DIEMAKERS ( DBA INTERMET) MONROE CITY MO 3365 63863FDRLMMALDE FEDERAL MOGUL CORP. MALDEN MO 3366 64501NTNLL1304W NATIONAL ALUMINUM BRASS FNDY. INC. INDEPENDENCE MO 3366 65265CRRCP1500I CERRO COPPER CASTING CO. MEXICO MO 3366 39567BRDJH3719I ROLLS ROYCE NAVAL MARINE INC. PASCAGOULA MS 3321 28208CHRLT1335S CHARLOTTE PIPE & FNDY. CO. CHARLOTTE NC 3366 28150CHSBR135OL METALSAMERICA SHELBY NC 3366 68025MGNSFSOUTH MAGNUS/ FARLEY INC. FREMONT NE 3369 68305MGNLMMAGNO MAGNOLIA METAL CORP. AUBURN NE 3324 03055HTCHNOLDWI HITCHINER MFG. CO. INC. MILFORD NH 3366 03235WBSTRSOMAI WEBSTER FNDY. CO. FRANKLIN NH 3366 03061BRNZCSIMON BRONZE CRAFT CORP. NASHUA NH 3321 08016SPPFNEASTP U. S. PIPE & FNDY. CO. BURLINGTON NJ 3321 08865TLNTC183SI ATLANTIC STATES CAST IRON PIPE CO. PHILLIPSBURG NJ SIC Facility TRI ID Facility Name City State FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 7 of 52 3324 07748NGNRD952PA ENGINEERED PRECISION CASTING CO. MIDDLETOWN NJ 3324 89706SRRCS2727L WGIC SIERRA CAST CARSON CITY NV 3321 14901KNNDY1021E KENNEDY VALVE ELMIRA NY 3324 13037GRYSY901EA GRAY SYRACUSE INC. CHITTENANGO NY 3365 14094MLWRD500MI MILWARD ALLOYS INC. LOCKPORT NY 3365 13662GNRLMPOBOX GMC POWERTRAIN MASSENA MASSENA NY 3321 44142FRDMT5600H FORD MOTOR CO. CLEVELAND CASTING BROOK PARK OH 3321 43512GMC STATE GMC POWERTRAIN DEFIANCE DEFIANCE OH 3321 44460QKRCT310EU QUAKER CITY CASTINGS INC. SALEM OH 3321 44036LYRFN120FI ELYRIA FNDY. ELYRIA OH 3321 44903MNSFL500NO CITATION MANSFIELD MANSFIELD OH 3321 45638RNTNR2520S INTERMET CORP. IRONTON IRON INC. IRONTON OH 3321 45804WHMC 1600M WHEMCO OHIO FNDY. DIV. INC. LIMA OH 3321 45640SCNDSATHEN OSCO IND. INC. JACKSON DIV. JACKSON OH 3321 43812CLWWT2266S CLOW WATER SYS. CO. COSHOCTON OH 3325 43207BCKYS2211P BUCKEYE STEEL CASTINGS CO. COLUMBUS OH 3325 45404DRRNC450NO FLOWSERVE CORP. FDRY OPS. DAYTON OH 3325 44871SNDSK615WE SANDUSKY INTL. INC. SANDUSKY OH 3365 44030GNRLL1043C GENERAL ALUMINUM MFG. CO. CONNEAUT OH 3365 45822CLNLM7059S CELINA ALUMINUM PRECISION TECH. CELINA OH 3365 45365RSSLM70781 ROSS ALUMINUM FOUNDRIES II SIDNEY OH 3366 44864MNSFL150FI MANSFIELD PLUMBING PRODS. L. L. C. PERRYSVILLE OH 3366 44052MRCNC305OB JOHNSON METALL INC. LORAIN OH 3369 44902GLPCH153EA BUNTING BEARINGS CORP. MANSFIELD OH 3369 44432LBCFN230WM ALBCO FOUNDRY INC. LISBON OH 3324 97206LRGST4600S PCC STRUCTURALS INC. LARGE PARTS CAMPUS PORTLAND OR 3324 97015SMLLS13340 PCC STRUCTURALS INC. SMALL STRUCTURALS BUSINESS OP CLACKAMAS OR 3324 97045PDMNF13963 PED MFG. LTD. OREGON CITY OR 3325 97062DRMTL9560S DURAMETAL CORP. TUALATIN OR 3369 97321MTTNM150QU PACIFIC CAST TECHS. INC. ALBANY OR 3369 97222PCCDR13350 PCC STRUCTURALS INC. DEER CREEK ANNEX MILWAUKIE OR 3369 97756PCCSC345NE PCC STRUCTURALS INC. SCHLOSSER REDMOND OR 3321 16335DVNCDPOBOX ADVANCED CAST PRODS. INC. MEADVILLE PA 3321 18042VCTLC4901K VICTAULIC CO. OF AMERICA FORKS FACILITY EASTON PA 3321 16501MC 603W1 GUNITE EMI CORP. ERIE PA 3321 19545BYRTW9THRO BOYERTOWN FNDY. CO. NEW BERLINVILLE PA 3321 16125HDGFN42LEE SVEDALA GRINDING HODGE FNDY. GREENVILLE PA 3321 18011VCTLC8023Q VICTAULIC CO. OF AMERICA ALBURTIS FACILITY ALBURTIS PA 3322 17512GRNNL1411L ANVIL INTL. INC. COLUMBIA PA 3324 17067CMQKR640SC TECH CAST INC. MYERSTOWN PA 3325 17067QKRLLERICH QUAKER ALLOY INC. MYERSTOWN PA 3325 15059WSTHMONE12 WEST HOMESTEAD ENG. & MACHINE CO. MIDLAND PA 3325 15201MCCNW10948 MCCONWAY & TORLEY CORP. PITTSBURGH PA 3325 15066DMSCSPOBOX DAMASCUS STEEL CASTING CO. NEW BRIGHTON PA 3325 19526PNNSYTHIRD PENNSYLVANIA STEEL FNDY. & MACHINE CO. HAMBURG PA 3325 15683BLWKNBRIDG DURALOY TECHS. INC. SCOTTDALE PA 3365 18017HWMTL2175A HOWMET ALUMINUM CASTING INC. BETHLEHEM PA 3366 19381MTLLR810LI METALLURGICAL PRODS. CO. WEST CHESTER PA SIC Facility TRI ID Facility Name City State FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 8 of 52 3366 16506RBRNZ6300W ERIE BRONZE & ALUMINUM ERIE PA 3364 02861RBCND645NA RIBCO MFG. INC. PAWTUCKET RI 3366 29801GRHMB45WIN YORK BRONZE CO. ( DBA GORHAM BRONZE LTD.) AIKEN SC 3321 37343WHLND2800S NORTH AMERICAN ROYALTIES INC. WHELAND FNDY. DIV. CHATTANOOGA TN 3325 38478MRCNM2360I MAGOTTEAUX CORP. PULASKI TN 3366 37874NGKMT917ST NGK METALS CORP. SWEETWATER TN 3369 37406STHRN4106S SOUTHERN CENTRIFUGAL DIV. CHATTANOOGA TN 3321 75710TYLRPHIGHW TYLER PIPE CO. TYLER TX 3324 78702PRCST2110E PURE CASTINGS CO. AUSTIN TX 3325 76501DLTCN3402C DELTA CENTRIFUGAL CORP. TEMPLE TX 3325 75604STHWS600FO SOUTHWEST STEEL CASTING CO. LONGVIEW TX 3369 76307HWMTC6200C HOWMET CORP. WICHITA FALLS TX 3321 24505LYNCHRT726 INTERMET ARCHER CREEK FNDY. LYNCHBURG VA 3321 24141LYNCHFIRST INTERMET RADFORD FNDY. RADFORD VA 3321 24505GRFFNADAMS GRIFFIN PIPE PRODS. CO. LYNCHBURG VA 3366 22980VRGNM1010E VIRGINIA METALCRAFTERS INC. WAYNESBORO VA 3369 23661HWMTCONEHO HOWMET CORP. HAMPTON VA 3325 98409TLSFN3021S ATLAS FNDY. & MACHINE CO. TACOMA WA 3321 54981WPCFN406ND WAUPACA FNDY. INC. PLANT 1 WAUPACA WI 3321 54981WPCFNTOWER WAUPACA FNDY. INC. PLANT 2/ 3 WAUPACA WI 3321 54143WPCFN805OD WAUPACA FNDY. INC. PLANT 4 MARINETTE WI 3321 53511BLTCR1401E PRIME CAST INC. BELOIT WI 3321 54110BRLLN200PA BRILLION IRON WORKS INC. BRILLION WI 3321 54956NNHFN2121B NEENAH FNDY. CO. NEENAH WI 3321 53581RCHLNFOUND RICHLAND CENTER FNDY. RICHLAND CENTER WI 3322 53172PPLTN2105S EGS ELECTRICAL GROUP APPLETON SO. MILWAUKEE WI 3324 53209STNLS5150N STAINLESS FNDY. & ENG. INC. MILWAUKEE WI 3324 53223SGNCS9000N SIGNICAST CORP. MILWAUKEE WI 3324 53094WSCNS661S1 WISCONSIN INVESTCAST WATERTOWN WI 3325 53188WSCNS905EA WISCONSIN CENTRIFUGAL WAUKESHA WI 3325 53404RCNST1442N RACINE STEEL CASTING DIV. RACINE WI 3325 53186WKSHF1300L WAUKESHA FNDY. CO. INC. WAUKESHA WI 3364 53022RHCSTN114W RHEOCAST CO. GERMANTOWN WI 3369 53080JHNSN270NM JOHNSON BRASS & MACHINE SAUKVILLE WI 3366 26537SHDWBSISLE YORK BRONZE CO. ( DBA SHEIDOW BRONZE CORP.) KINGWOOD WV 3366 26003HBCNC21418 HUBCO BRONZE INC. WHEELING WV 3366 26537YRKBRKINNE YORK BRONZE WEST ANNEX FACILITY KINGWOOD WV Of the 189 facilities reporting discharges to PCS or TRI, over 50% ( 95) are concentrated in 6 states: Ohio ( 21), Pennsylvania ( 17), Wisconsin ( 16), Indiana ( 14), Michigan ( 14), and Alabama ( 13). The rest are located in 30 states around the country. It is worth noting that Region V covers the 4 states printed in bold, and over 40% ( 79) of the reporting facilities are located in this Region. The map on the following page shows the locations of the facilities reporting to TRI or PCS. FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 9 of 52 U. S. Census data indicates an overall increase in the number of the number of metal molding facilities between 1992 and 1997. Value of goods shipped has also increased by 15% or more for bituminous coal during the same time period. See Table 4 below. Advance comparative statistics for 1997 to 2002 for the broader category represented by NAICS code 331 ( industries that smelt and/ or refine metals using electrometallurgical processes) show a 17.6% increase in the number of establishments and a 19% decrease in the value of shipments ( not adjusted for inflation). See Table 5 below.

Table 4. 1992 and 1997 Census Data SIC Industry Sector Number of Establishments Value of Goods Shipped ( billions of dollars)

1997 1992 % Change 1997 1992 % Change 3321 Gray and Ductile Iron Foundries 669 709  6 11.9 7.7 53 3322 Malleable Iron Foundries 28 24 17 0.35 0.25 42 3324 Steel Investment Foundries 159 152 5 2.3 1.7 35 3325 Steel Foundries, Not Elsewhere Classified 288 287 0.3 2.9 2.1 40 3364 Nonferrous Die Casting, Except Aluminum 279 263 6 2.0 1.0 101 3365 Aluminum foundries 626 591 6 3.9 1.9 101 3366 Copper Foundries 312 329  5 0.86 0.74 15 3369 Nonferrous Foundries, Except Aluminum & Copper 141 119 19 0.96 0.46 109 Source: 1997 U. S. Economic Census Table 5. 1997 and 2002 Census Data NAICS Industry Segment Number of Establishments Value of Goods Shipped ( billions of dollars)

2002 1997 % Change 2002 1997 % Change 331 Primary Metal Manufacturing 5,952 5,059 17.6 136 168  19 Source: 2002 U. S. Economic Census FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 11 of 52 Wastewater Characteristics and Pollutant Sources Wastewater pollutant loads from facilities in this industry depend on water usage, type of metal being cast, and the production process employed. Suspended solids and metals loading are higher in scrubber wastewaters than in mold cooling wastewaters. Oil and grease and organic priority pollutant loadings are higher in die casting wastewaters than in casting quench wastewaters. A major portion of the wastewater from die casting operations is water used as a carrier solution for oily die casting lubricants.

Table 6 presents information about wastewater flows for this industry and Table 7 presents the sources of process wastewater in this point source category. Approximately 80 percent of the regulated wastewater from this industry is generated by wet air pollution control devices.

Table 6. Wastewater Flows SIC No. of Major Facilities Reporting Nonzero Flows Median Facility Flow ( MG) Range of Facility Flows ( MG) Total Flow ( MG)

3321 4 709 315 7008 8,740 3322 NA NA NA NA 3324 NA NA NA NA 3325 2 431 57 805 862 3364 NA NA NA NA 3365 2 90 89 92 180 3366 NA NA NA NA 3369 NA NA NA NA Source: PCSLoads2000. NA indicates that PCS data were not available for the SIC code.

Table 7. Sources of Process Wastewater in Metal Molding and Casting Process Wastewater Pollutants Casting cleaning metals, suspended solids, oil and grease, toxic organics Casting quench metals, suspended solids, oil and grease, toxic organics Die Casting metals, suspended solids, oil and grease, toxic organics, phenols Dust collection scrubber metals, suspended solids, oil and grease, toxic organics, phenols Grinding scrubber metals, suspended solids, oil and grease, total toxic organics Process Wastewater Pollutants FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 12 of 52 Investment casting metals, suspended solids, oil and grease, toxic organics Melting furnace scrubber metals, suspended solids, oil and grease, toxic organics, phenols Mold cooling metals, suspended solids, oil and grease, toxic organics Slag quench metals, suspended solids, oil and grease, toxic organics Wet sand reclamation metals, suspended solids, oil and grease, toxic organics, phenols Source: Development Document for Metal Molding and Casting, 1985.

Pollutants Discharged Pollutant discharges to surface waters as reported to PCS and TRI were evaluated as part of the Factor 1 Analysis: Human Health and Environmental Impacts. Pounds reported as discharged were converted, wherever possible, to their toxic weighted pound equivalents to provide a sense of relative hazard associated with those discharges. ( Note: indirect discharge amounts reflect reductions that are expected to occur at the receiving treatment facility.) Both TRI and PCS contain information about pollutants discharged by metal molding and casting facilities.

PCS: Of the 8 facilities reporting discharges to PCS, a single facility in Texas accounts for 66% of the pounds discharged. A second facility in Kentucky accounts for an additional 20% of the pounds discharged. When looking at toxic weighted pounds, discharges reported to PCS by a single facility in Texas accounts for 77% of the toxic weighted pound equivalents ( TWPE) discharge reported to that database. ( This facility is also the highest discharger of pollutant pounds.) A second facility in Indiana contributes an additional 12%.

TRI: Of the 182 facilities reporting discharges to TRI, 2 facilities in Oregon account for 65% of the pounds discharged. A third facility, located in Pennsylvania, contributes an additional 10% of the pollutant pounds discharged. When looking at toxic weighted pounds, discharges reported to TRI by a single facility in Pennsylvania accounts for 65% of the TWPE reported to that database. A second facility in New York contributes another 15% of the reported TRI TWPE.

Overall: Of the 189 total facilities reporting discharges for this industry, the top discharger in Texas reporting to PCS accounts for 48% of the total pollutant pounds discharged. The top two dischargers in Oregon reporting to TRI account for an additional 34% of the total pounds. When looking at toxic weighted pounds, only 5 facilities, all in SIC 3321 ( Gray and Ductile Iron Foundries), account for 85% of the TWPE discharged. Two facilities account for over 70% of the overall TWPE discharged: one in Pennsylvania ( 58%) and one in New York ( 13%). FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 13 of 52 Discharged pollutants can be characterized as nonconventional, conventional, or priority pollutants. Table 8 below shows the relative contributions of each pollutant type. See Attachment D for the discharges in toxic weighted pounds as reported to PCS by each facility and see Attachment E for the discharges in toxic weighted pounds as reported to TRI by each facility See Attachment F for a breakout of these discharges by pollutant. A discussion of each pollutant type discharged follows the table.

Table 8. Pollutant Discharges Reported to PCS and TRI Pollutant Category & Primary Pollutants* PCS LBS PCS TWPE TRI POUNDS TRI TWPE All Pollutants 2,253,343 5,834 284,419 45,182 Nonconventional 2,008,818 561 257,189 31,399 SODIUM NITRITE     78,062 29,143 ( 93%)

CHLORINE, TOTAL RESIDUAL 817 398 ( 71%) 2,600 1,266 ( 4%)

MOLYBDENUM 517 104 ( 19%)     Conventional 233,663 0 0 0 OIL AND GREASE 133,461       TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS 91,425       BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND 8,777       Priority 10,862 5,273 27,230 13,783 LEAD 1,714 3,840 ( 73%) 3,173 7,108 ( 52%)

POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS 0.053 677 ( 13%)     COPPER 532 333 ( 6%) 8,380 5,254 ( 38%)

* The majority of each pollutant type is discharged by facilities in SIC 3321. FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 14 of 52 Nonconventional Pollutants About 89% of the pounds of both discharged pollutants reported to TRI and PCS are nonconventional pollutants and about 63% of all TWPE come from this class of pollutant. Sodium nitrite contributes 93% of the nonconventional TWPE discharged in TRI and 57% of the overall TWPE discharged. Total residual chlorine contributes 71% of the nonconventional TWPE discharged to TRI.

Conventional Pollutants Only 9% of the total discharged pounds reported to PCS are conventional pollutants. These discharges are dominated by oil and grease, which comprises 57% of the conventional pounds discharged. However, toxic weights are not available for conventional pollutant parameters. No information on conventional pollutants is available through TRI.

Priority Pollutants Only 1% of the total discharged pounds reported to PCS are priority pollutants. About 37% of all TWPE discharged by this industrial category come from discharges of priority pollutants. Among the priority pollutants discharged, lead and copper account for 87% of the discharged priority pollutant TWPE and 33% of the overall TWPE discharged.

For purposes of comparison, the toxic weighted pound equivalents ( TWPE) for Metal Molding and Casting are presented in the following tables along with the industries reporting the highest discharges in each database. Table 9 presents the information reported to PCS and Table 10 presents the information reported to TRI. For a description of the derivation of the values in these tables, see the memo in the public record titled " Description and Results of EPA Methodology to Synthesize Screening Level Results for the Effluent Guidelines Program Plan for 2004/ 2005," which is available through Edocket at document number OW 2003 0074 0391.

Table 9. Metal Molding and Casting TWPE Reported to PCS Compared to Top Ranking Results 40 CFR Part Point Source Category PCS Reported TWPE PCS Rank 423 Steam electric power generation 2,933,209 1 414 Organic chemicals, plastics and synthetic fibers 1,805,928 2 422 Phosphate manufacturing 1,095,321 3 415 Inorganic chemicals manufacturing 853,568 4 421 Nonferrous metals manufacturing 434,925 5 440 Ore mining and dressing 383,560 6 410 Textile mills 296,601 7 40 CFR Part Point Source Category PCS Reported TWPE PCS Rank FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 15 of 52 419 Petroleum refining 198,251 8 455 Pesticide chemicals manufacturing, formulating 178,977 9 418 Fertilizer manufacturing 116,464 10 464 Metal Molding and Casting 5,834 26 Table 10. Metal Molding and Casting TWPE Reported to TRI Compared to Top Ranking Results 40 CFR Part Point Source Category TRI Reported TWPE TRI Rank 414 Organic chemicals, plastics and synthetic fibers 7,303,782 1 423 Steam electric power generation 1,856,645 2 421 Nonferrous metals manufacturing 978,450 3 430 Pulp, paper and paperboard ( Phase II) 628,785 4 415 Inorganic chemicals manufacturing 624,250 5 429 Timber products processing 404,926 6 419 Petroleum refining 385,347 7 455 Pesticide chemicals manufacturing, formulating 324,393 8 428 Rubber manufacturing 166,343 9 463 Plastic molding and forming 106,189 10 464 Metal Molding and Casting 45,173 16 Treatment Technology and Pollution Prevention Standard treatment may include chemical precipitation and sedimentation, oil removal, and filtration. Pollution prevention activities focus on reducing waste sand, waste electric arc furnace dust and desulfurization slag, and increasing energy efficiency. See Table 11 for water conservation and pollution prevention alternatives. FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 16 of 52 Table 11. Water Conservation and Pollution Prevention Alternatives To Reduce Water Conservation/ Pollution Prevention Alternatives Solid Waste or Air Pollution ° Use vacuum molding which holds the sand in the shape of the pattern after pattern is removed. No shakeout equipment required and almost no waste sand is generated. ° Reclaim and reuse waste sand and metal through waste segregation, screening, dry scrubbing, or thermal reclamation. ° Improve furnace efficiency ° Install induction furnaces which are 75 80% energy efficient and emit 75% less dust and fumes ° Minimize metal melting by reducing excess melted metal ° Use alternative furnace fuels ( e. g., natural gas, lower grade/ low sulfur or low nitrogen fuel oil). ° Proper maintenance of furnaces to reduce air emissions. ° Recycle electric arc furnace ( EAF) dust to original process or reuse outside original process. ° Use charge material containing lower concentrations of lead, zinc, and cadmium ( e. g., charge modification program to develop reliable sources of high grade scrap metal). ° Minimize hazardous desulfurizing slag ( e. g., alternative desulfurization agents.

Water Uses and/ or Water Pollution ° Reduce phenols by substituting synthetic oils or water based materials, segregating waste streams at point of generation. ° Use of cooling water recycling systems. ° Optimize deburring operations to minimize total suspended solids. ° Use fewer additives, such as biocides, or additives containing no VOCs or HAPs. ° Use alternative die lubricants Source: OECA Sector Notebook: Profile of the Metal Casting Industry, 1998.

Concerns Identified Pre Proposal The Metal Molding and Casting point source category was identified by several responders surveyed by the Agency in the process of preparing the 2004/ 2005 Plan. Their suggestions are summarized below.

Comments on the Draft Strategy ( Section 2.2 of the " Factor 4 Analysis: Implementation and Efficiency Considerations   Status of Screening Level Review Phase" ( Edocket OW 2003 0074 0329) FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 17 of 52 A stakeholder asserts that the effluent guidelines should be re evaluated to address the discrepancy of metals limits between this category and those in the Metal Finishing effluent guidelines. The effluent standards for the Metal Molding and Casting category are production based, and when the appropriate values are applied and calculations performed to convert these into equivalent concentration limits, the resulting discharge limits for metals are orders of magnitude lower than the Metal Finishing standards. This suggests there is a problem either with the Metal Finishing standards ( which have been recently reviewed in the MP& M development) or the Metal Molding and Casting standards.

Previous Suggestions ( Section 2.4 of the " Factor 4 Analysis") Specific activities of concern identified by responders include fastener manufacturing, job shop galvanizers, and jewelry manufacturing. These activities seemed fit poorly into the scope of these effluent guidelines. Phenol was identified as a pollutant of concern.

Permitting Authorities ( Section 2.5 of the " Factor 4 Analysis") EPA permit writers and pretreatment coordinators have found cyanide to be an issue when molten slag is allowed to come into contact with the quench water in the quenching process. These EPA staff also identified concerns with implementing the guidelines for the aluminum die casters subcategory: 1) the applicability language is confusing and incomplete: only part of the casting process is covered; 2) the need to allow additional fundamentally different factors ( FDF) determinations; and 3) the problems meeting the limits they receive using the formulas provided in the guidelines, specifically for total phenols and for oil and grease. Expanding on this last item, EPA permit writers and pretreatment coordinators explain that the building block method for determining allowances, when applied to small facilities, results in a low limit on total phenols. These EPA staff assert that it is difficult to find technology to meet these low limits, resulting in a number of facilities being unable to meet a limit that was neither reasonable nor necessary to protect the publicly owned treatment works ( POTW). Although protecting POTWs is not one of the 304( m) evaluation criteria, EPA permit writers and pretreatment coordinators note that the resulting noncompliance forces Control Authorities to choose between escalating enforcement actions for a relatively minor infraction or ignoring the violation if they are convinced that all reasonable efforts have been made to meet the limits. Possible solutions to the problem could include 1) using production as a limiting factor to provide relief to smaller facilities, and 2) allowing Control Authorities to apply concentration based standards, similar to the approach used in Porcelain Enameling ( 40 CFR 466). These EPA staffs also asserted that EPA removed the phenol limits from the pretreatment standards of the Organic Chemicals, Plastics, and Synthetic Fibers effluent guidelines ( 40 CFR 414) after finding that phenol did not pass through POTWs.

AMSA and ASIWPCA ( Section 2.6 of the " Factor 4 Analysis") ASIWPCA stakeholders ( AL) identified several effluent guidelines that are out of date relative to available technology, including Metal Molding and Casting.

Concerns Identified in Comments to Proposal FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 18 of 52 A commenter on the Preliminary Plan identifies inconsistencies and mistakes in the Metal Molding and Casting point source category. The commenter asserts that these regulations have huge discrepancies between the regulations and the development document and urges the Agency to correct the many errors in the effluent limitations guidelines.

Additional Concerns Identified Post Proposal Several additional concerns were identified during followup discussions about issues raised prior to proposal. These are presented here.

Discharge of Phenol by Die Casters: In an e mail collection of suggestions, four state pretreatment coordinators discussed implementation and efficiency issues for this industrial category. One coordinator notes that having die casting limits based on production results in a lot of small shops being often out of compliance because they can't meet the limits at their low production volumes. A second coordinator reports that die casters have constant problems with the total phenols and oil & grease limits. During follow up discussions, an additional pretreatment coordinator explained that the problem usually occurred in small facilities where their only allowance for phenol came from the tiny amount provided for die casting. This proves insufficient to account for background levels of phenol.

Another coordinator notes that casting cleaning operations ( listed in the aluminum casting and ferrous casting subcategories) does not occur and cannot occur given the definitions and conditions of the regulation. All subcategories have a casting quench operation, but the definitions make it clear that the standard applies only to pre cooling operations. Because of the way the definitions are written at 464.02 ( a) " Aluminum Casting" and 464.02 ( b) " Ferrous Casting," cleaning operations are not captured by the regulation. A simple solution is to correct the general definitions. See suggestions in the following paragraph. An alternative to changing the definitions would be to eliminate the allocations for casting cleaning from these subcategories since it applies to an operation that cannot exist under this regulation the way it is written.

For the aluminum casting definition, insert the underlined text " Processing operations following the cooling of castings not covered under aluminum forming, except for grinding scrubber operations and casting cleaning operations, which are covered here, are covered under electroplating and metal finishing point source categories ( 40 CFR 413 & 433)." For the ferrous casting definition, insert the underlined text " Except for grinding scrubber operations and casting cleaning operations which are covered here, processing operations following the cooling of castings are covered under electroplating and metal finishing point source categories ( 40 CFR 413 & 433)."

A fourth coordinator notes that in the aluminum forming subcategory, production standards result in extremely low permit limits. Whenever production changes by as little as 20%, permit limits have to be changed accordingly. Concentration based standards would save the endless modification and the associated administrative burden. It also seems inconsistent to require metal FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 19 of 52 finishers to discharge a pollutant at the parts per million ( ppm) level while the production based industry is required to meet a parts per billion ( ppb) level.

Poor Fit for Subcategory: Fastener Manufacturing operations ( manufacture of screws, bolts and other small parts, frequently for aerospace applications) are covered by either the metal finishing standards and metal molding & casting standards. Due to the small and complicated configuration of the parts, however, it is extremely difficult to apply the existing categorical standards correctly. This industry generates a metal bearing, oily waste stream that is difficult to treat and it is not well reflected in the current categorical standards.

Followup Contacts Don Anderson, EPA/ OST/ EAD ( 202) 566 1021 Marshall Hyatt, EPA Region 4, ( 404) 562 9304 Lee Boehme, EPA Region 6, ( 214) 665 7532 Paul Marshall, EPA Region 7, ( 913) 551 7419 Keith Silva, EPA Region 9, ( 415) 972 3509 Allan Gilliam, Arkansas DEQ ( 501) 682 0625 Glenda Dean, Alabama, ( 334) 270 5602 Steve Caspers, Kansas, ( 785) 296 5551 Grace Scott, Michigan ( scottg@ mi. gov) David Knight, Washington Dept. of Ecology Possible Solutions EPA appreciates all comments and suggestions provided by the stakeholders and EPA Regional staff. However, as with any comments received by the Agency, EPA cannot address these suggestions without adequate supporting data. In the event that stakeholders provide additional data and supporting information on these issues, EPA will reevaluate them. At present, based on information reported to TRI and PCS, toxic discharges from metal molding and casting facilities are low relative to other industrial categories. In addition, generally, a few facilities drive the toxic weighted pound equivalents ( TWPE) loading estimates from both TRI and PCS. In the absence of revisions to the effluent guidelines, these concerns could be addressed through improved information dissemination and outreach by EPA.

Discharge of Phenol by Die Casters: These concerns may be based on non recycled wastewater; however, the basis for the guidelines for this point source category was recycling. One respondent noted that the industrial coupled plasma ( ICP) sampling method is the least sensitive method ( i. e. it has the highest detection limits) and thus provides a reasonable measure of the concentration of phenol present before setting limits for this pollutant, especially for manufacturers of small products, including die casters. Therefore, it could be used to provide a more reasonable approach to determining the presence of phenol prior to developing limits for FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 20 of 52 this pollutant. EPA could address this issue through the preparation of a fact sheet that clearly describes that basis.

However, the concern may be the result of conditions in smaller die casting operations that may not have been adequately studied during the development of the guidelines. To explore this concern, EPA could confirm whether smaller aluminum casters were evaluated during guideline development. If in fact they were not, EPA could then solicit data from the respondents or the facilities they identify, to verify these claims. Any information received through this effort could be considered during subsequent planning cycles. Alternatively, EPA should establish metal concentrations which are considered " domestic equivalent" and establish that no categorical standards require industry to treat below " domestic equivalent" concentrations so long as the control authority finds that there are no unrealized opportunities for flow reduction or pollution prevention.

Engineering and Analysis Division ( EAD) can share all of these concerns with the Office of Wastewater Management ( OWM) to assist them in improving the implementation of these effluent guidelines.

Consistency Application of the Guidelines, especially with Metal Finishing: Applicability issues could be readily addressed through the preparation of a fact sheet that clearly identifies the processes that may be common to both industries, possibly in a table of potentially overlapping guidelines, and provides clarification about the process of identifying the applicable effluent guideline. This fact sheet can draw upon the clarifications and guidance EPA included in both the preamble and the regulation. For more complex cases, individual discussions with EPA staff may prove to be the most efficient approach. EAD can share these concerns with OWM to assist them in increasing the consistency of application of effluent guidelines.

Poor Fit for a Subcategory: Issues surrounding standards for fastener manufacturing seem casespecific and may be best addressed through individual discussions with EPA staff. EAD can share these concerns with the OWM to assist them in increasing the consistency of application of effluent guidelines.

Discrepancies Between These Guidelines and Those for Metal Finishers: EPA notes that limitations and standards for each industrial category consider the best available technology economically achievable for a particular subcategory of a particular industry. As a result of differences in wastewater characteristics, treatment and pollution prevention technologies, and economic considerations, limitations vary from one industrial category to the next. Limits in effluent guidelines set for the same pollutant can differ for a variety of reasons, including the processes in use by each industry, the characteristics of their wastewaters, the technologies in use by the industry, and industry specific evaluations of affordability. EAD can share these concerns with OWM to assist them in increasing the consistency of application of effluent guidelines.

Summary of Potential Solutions: Most of the concerns identified for this industry could be addressed through improved information dissemination and outreach by EPA. The Agency could FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 21 of 52 prepare a fact sheet with answers to frequently asked questions ( FAQs), including a table of potentially overlapping guidelines, and post it on its web site. In addition, the Agency could announce the availability of this fact sheet, and the name of the current EAD staff available to answer questions at the regular meetings for permit writers and pretreatment coordinators held by the Office of Wastewater Management ( OWM). Finally, due to the relatively small number of facilities discharging the bulk of the TWPE, EPA could also provide assistance to permit writers in preparing BPJ based permits.

To explore the concern about the limits for phenol, EPA could confirm whether smaller aluminum casters were evaluated during guideline development. If in fact they were not, EPA could then solicit data from the respondents or the facilities they identify in order to verify and clarify the issue. Any information received through this research effort could be considered during a subsequent planning cycle. FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 22 of 52 Attachment A EPA Databases and References Used in this Review Overview of the 304( m) Planning Process CWA Section 304( m)( 1) requires EPA to establish a schedule for the annual review and revision of all existing effluent guidelines and to identify categories of point sources discharging toxic or non conventional pollutants for which EPA has not published effluent guidelines. To accomplish this review, EPA conducted a screening level analysis using readily available information from EPA's Permit Compliance System ( PCS) and Toxics Release Inventory ( TRI) databases. EPA estimated the mass of pollutants discharged from each category, weighted the pollutant releases based on chemical toxicity, and ranked the categories based on the toxicweighted pollutant releases.

In addition to reported discharges in PCS and TRI, EPA used other readily available data, as well as information from public outreach, including industry categories recommended by stakeholders for regulatory development or regulatory revision, to evaluate implementation and efficiency considerations.

For additional details on EPA's screening level analysis refer the following documents in EPA Docket Number OW 2003 0074:

Memorandum: Description and Results of EPA Methodology to Synthesize Screening Level Results for the Effluent Guidelines Program Plan for 2004/ 2005, DCN 548, Section 3.0;

Development of PCSLoads 2000, DCN 620, Section 2.1.2 ( this document explains how pollutant loads were calculated from PCS data); and

Evaluation of RSEI Model Runs, DCN 618, Section 2.1.1.

Information from EPA's Permit Compliance System ( PCS) and Toxics Release Inventory ( TRI) databases were used to create the PCSLoads2000 and TRIReleases2000 databases. These databases were the primary source of information used to conduct this review. Since this industry ranked low during the screening phase, however, EPA did not verify any of the information reported to PCS and TRI, and has used it as reported.

TRIReleases2000 The Toxic Release Inventory ( TRI) is the major source of data for the TRIReleases2000 database. TRI is the common name for Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act ( EPCRA). Each year, facilities that meet certain thresholds must report their FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 23 of 52 releases and other waste management activities for listed toxic chemicals. That is, facilities must report the quantities of toxic chemicals recycled, collected and combusted for energy recovery, treated for destruction, or disposed of. A separate report must be filed for each chemical that exceeds the reporting threshold. The TRI list of chemicals for reporting year 2000 includes more than 600 chemicals and chemical categories. For this review, EPA used data for reporting year 2000, because they were the most recent available at the time the review began.

There are three criteria that a facility must meet to be required to submit a TRI report for that reporting year. The criteria are:

( 1) SIC Code Determination: Facilities in SIC Codes 20 through 39, seven additional SIC codes outside this range, and federal facilities must concern themselves with TRI reporting. EPA rarely checks or refutes facility claims regarding the SIC code identification. The primary SIC code determines TRI reporting.

( 2) Number of Employees: Facilities must have 10 or more full time employees or their equivalent. EPA defines a " full time equivalent" as a person that works 2,000 hours in the reporting year ( there are several exceptions and special circumstances that are well defined in the TRI reporting instructions).

( 3) Activity Thresholds: If the facility is in a covered SIC code and has 10 or more full time employee equivalents it must conduct an activity threshold analysis for every chemical and chemical category on the current TRI list. The facility must determine whether it manufactures, processes, OR otherwise uses each chemical at or above the appropriate activity threshold. Reporting thresholds are not based on the amount of release. All TRI thresholds are based on mass, not concentration. Different thresholds apply for persistent bioaccumulative toxic ( PBT) chemicals than for non PBT chemicals.

In TRI, facilities report annual loads released to the environment of each toxic chemical or chemical category that meets reporting requirements. They must report onsite releases to air, receiving streams, disposal to land, underground wells, and several other categories. They must also report the amount of toxic chemicals in wastes transferred to off site locations, including discharges to POTWs and other off site locations, such as commercial waste disposal facilities.

For this review, EPA focused on the amount of chemicals facilities reported either discharging directly to a receiving stream or transferring to a POTW. For facilities discharging directly to a stream, the loads were taken directly from the reported TRI data for calendar year 2000. For facilities that transfer toxic chemicals to POTWs, EPA first adjusted the TRI pollutant loads reported to be transferred to POTWs to account for pollutant removal that occurs at the POTW prior to discharge to the receiving stream. This adjustment was made using POTW removal efficiencies from EPA's Risk Screening Environmental Indicators ( RSEI) model ( see Section 2.1.1 of the docket for more information on TRI and the RSEI model). FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 24 of 52 Reporting facilities are not required to sample and analyze wastestreams to determine the quantities of toxic chemicals released. They may estimate releases based on mass balance calculations, published emission factors, site specific emission factors, or other approaches. Facilities are required to indicate, by a reporting code, the basis of their release estimate. TRI's reporting guidance is that for chemicals reasonably expected to be present but measured below the detection limit, facilities should use one half the detection limit to estimate the mass released. The guidance is slightly different for dioxins and dioxin like compounds in that it allows nondetects to be treated as zero.

TRI provides the option for facilities to report releases as specific numbers or as ranges, if appropriate. Specific estimates are encouraged if data are available to ensure the accuracy; however, EPA allows facilities to report releases in the following ranges: 1 to 10 pounds, 11 to 499 pounds, and 500 to 999 pounds. For this analysis, EPA used the mid point of each reported range to represent a facility's releases.

EPA weighted the direct and indirect pollutant releases to surface waters using toxic weighting factors ( TWFs) developed by Office of Water/ Engineering and Analysis Division ( EAD), to calculate toxic weighted pound equivalents ( TWPE) for each reported release. See 4.2.3 and 4.2.4 for more discussion of TWFs and calculation of TWPE. EPA compiled data taken from TRI, the adjusted releases from POTWs to surface waters, the calculated TWPE, and the relationship between SIC codes and point source category into a Microsoft Access   database named TRIReleases2000. Some corrections were made to this database as further study was conducted on the TRI data. Limitations of TRI are discussed in Section IV of the Technical Support Document for this planning process.

PCSLoads2000 The Permit Compliance System ( PCS) is the major source of data for the PCSLoads2000 database. PCS is a computerized management information system maintained by EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance ( OECA). It was created to track permit, compliance, and enforcement status of facilities regulated by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) program under the Clean Water Act ( CWA).

More than 65,000 industrial facilities and water treatment plants have obtained permits for water discharges of regulated pollutants. To provide an initial framework for setting permit issuance priorities, EPA developed a major/ minor classification system for industrial and municipal wastewater discharges. Major discharges almost always have the capability to impact receiving waters if not controlled and, therefore, have been accorded more regulatory attention than minor discharges. There are approximately 6,400 facilities ( including sewerage systems) with major discharges for which PCS has extensive records. Permitting authorities classify discharges as major based on an assessment of six characteristics: FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 25 of 52 ( 1) toxic pollutant potential; ( 2) ratio of discharge flow to stream flow; ( 3) conventional pollutant loading; ( 4) public health impact; ( 5) water quality factors; and ( 6) proximity to coastal waters.

Facilities with major discharges must report compliance with NPDES permit limits via monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports ( DMRs) submitted to the permitting authority. The permitting authority enters the reported DMR data into PCS, including the type of violation ( if any), concentration and quantity values, and the Quarterly Non Compliance Report ( QNCR) indicators. Minor discharges may, or may not, adversely impact receiving water if not controlled. Therefore, EPA does not require DMRs for facilities with minor discharges. For this reason, the PCS database includes data only for a limited set of minor dischargers when the states choose to include these data. As a consequence, extensive data are not available for minor discharges in PCS.

Parameters in PCS include water quality parameters ( such as pH and temperature), specific chemicals, bulk parameters ( such as BOD 5 and TSS), and flow rates. Although other pollutants may be discharged, PCS only contains data for the parameters identified in the facility's NPDES permit. Facilities typically report monthly average pounds per day discharged, but also report daily maxima, and pollutant concentrations.

For this review, EPA used data for reporting year 2000, to correspond to the data obtained from TRI. EPA used its Effluent Data Statistics ( EDS) system program to calculate annual pollutant discharges using the monthly reports in PCS. Because units of measure vary widely in PCS, EPA developed the EDS system to estimate mass loadings based on data stored in PCS. The EDS system uses existing PCS reported mass loading values or multiplies reported discharge flows and effluent concentrations to estimate loadings for each outfall ( discharge pipe), taking into account the various units of concentration and flow rates.

Where concentrations were reported as below detection limit ( BDL) EPA assumed the parameter concentration was equal to zero for parameters never detected by the facility in 2000. For parameters sometimes detected and sometimes not, the " BDL" concentration was set equal to half of the detection limit. . The EDS system program sums the monthly loads to calculate annual discharges, interpolating ( using average reported loads) for months with missing reports.

EPA weighted the calculated annual pollutant discharges using EAD's TWFs to calculate TWPE for each reported discharge, as it did for the reported TRI releases. See sections 4.2.3 and 4.2.4 for more discussion of TWFs and calculation of TWPE. EPA compiled data taken from PCS, the calculated TWPE, and the relationship between SIC codes and point source category into a Microsoft Access   database named PCSLoads2000. As further study was conducted on the PCS data, some corrections were made. FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 26 of 52 Other Information Sources In addition to TRI and PCS, EPA used the following sources of information in its review of this industry include:

1997 Economic Census data; and 2002 Economic Census data.

Contacts with reporting facilities to verify reported releases and facility categorization.

US EPA, October 1985. Development Document for Final Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Metal Molding and Casting ( Foundry) Point Source Category. EPA440/ 1 85/ 070.

US EPA, 1998. Office of Compliance Sector Notebook Project: Profile of the Metal Casting Industry. EPA/ 310 R 97 004.

US. 2001. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR Part 464: Metal Molding and Casting Point Source Category. FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 27 of 52 Attachment B Point Source Categories Identified Solely Through Factor 4 Industry Formal Comment Process Previous Suggestions ( Sec. 2.4) Draft Strategy Outreach Comments on Draft Strategy ( Sec. 2.2) Comments on 2002/ 2003 Plan ( Sec. 2.3) Permitting Authorities ( Sec. 2.5) AMSA & ASIWPCA ( Sec. 2.6)

Coal Mining

Coil Coating

Dairy Products Processing

Electrical and Electronic Components

Fruits and Vegetable Processing

Metal Molding and Casting

Mineral Mining and Processing

Seafood Processing

FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 28 of 52 Attachment C Applicability and Regulatory History Applicability of 40 CFR Part 464 Subpart A  Aluminum Casting Subcategory. The provisions of this subpart are applicable to discharges to waters of the United States and to the introduction of pollutants into publicly owned treatment works resulting from aluminum casting operations. definition: The term aluminum casting shall mean the remelting of aluminum or an aluminum alloy to form a cast intermediate or final product by pouring or forcing the molten metal into a mold, except for ingots, pigs, or other cast shapes related to nonferrous ( primary and secondary) metals manufacturing ( 40 CFR part 421) and aluminum forming ( 40 CFR part 467). Processing operations following the cooling of castings not covered under aluminum forming, except for grinding scrubber operations which are covered here, are covered under the electroplating and metal finishing point source categories ( 40 CFR parts 413 and 433).

Subpart B  Copper Casting Subcategory. The provisions of this subpart are applicable to discharges to waters of the United States and to the introduction of pollutants into publicly owned treatment works resulting from copper casting operations. definition: The term copper casting shall mean the remelting of copper or a copper alloy to form a cast intermediate or final product by pouring or forcing the molten metal into a mold, except for ingots, pigs, or other cast shapes related to nonferrous ( primary and secondary) metals manufacturing ( 40 CFR part 421). Also excluded are casting of beryllium alloys in which beryllium is present at 0.1 or greater percent by weight and precious metals alloys in which the precious metal is present at 30 or greater percent by weight. Except for grinding scrubber operations which are covered here, processing operations following the cooling of castings are covered under the electroplating and metal finishing point source categories ( 40 CFR parts 413 and 433).

Subpart C  Ferrous Casting Subcategory. The provisions of this subpart are applicable to discharges to waters of the United States and to the introduction of pollutants into publicly owned treatment works resulting from ferrous casting operations. definition: The term ferrous casting shall mean the remelting of ferrous metals to form a cast intermediate or finished product by pouring the molten metal into a mold. Except for grinding scrubber operations which are covered here, processing operations following the cooling of castings are covered under the electroplating and metal finishing point source categories ( 40 CFR parts 413 and 433).

Subpart D  Zinc Casting Subcategory. The provisions of this subpart are applicable to discharges to waters of the United States and to the introduction of pollutants into publicly owned treatment works resulting from zinc casting operations. definition: The term zinc casting shall mean the remelting of zinc or zinc alloy to form a FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 29 of 52 cast intermediate or final product by pouring or forcing the molten metal into a mold, except for ingots, pigs, or other cast shapes related to nonferrous ( primary) metals manufacturing ( 40 CFR part 421) and nonferrous metals forming ( 40 CFR part 471). Processing operations following the cooling of castings not covered under nonferrous metals forming are covered under the electroplating and metal finishing point source categories ( 40 CFR parts 413 and 433).

REGULATORY BACKGROUND Regulatory History Effluent limitations were first proposed November 1982. Final versions of the effluent limitations for Subparts A  D were promulgated October 30, 1985. EPA established no limitations for the Magnesium Casting subcategory as the Agency determined they were not achievable economically for existing plants.

Existing Limitations Effluent limitations guidelines are mass based on the basis of metric ton ( kkg) of metal poured or sand reclaimed, or standard cubic meters ( Sm3) of air scrubbed. Limitations were established based on a subcategorization and production process segmentation scheme. Separate limitations were developed for facilities with intermittent or non continuous discharge.

The technology basis of existing regulations is recycle, lime precipitation and sedimentation for BPT and recycle, lime precipitation and sedimentation, and filtration for BAT, NSPS, PSES and PSNS.

° BCT was reserved for all Subparts ( A D).

NSPS are equal to BAT; PSNS are equal to PSES.

" No discharge of process wastewater" is the basis of limitations for 3 of the 28 regulated process segments. These processes are the grinding scrubber process for the aluminum, copper, and ferrous casting subparts.

Table C 1 presents the 30 day averages for BPT and for BAT/ NSPS/ PSES/ PSNS. FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 30 of 52 Table C 1. Effluent Guidelines for Metal Molding and Casting   Continuous Direct Dischargers ( kg/ kkg)

Pollutant Parameter BPT 30 day averages BAT/ NSPS/ PSES/ PSNS 30 day averages TSS 0.13 165 0.104 165 ( b)

Oil and grease 0.0864 110 0.0864 110 ( b)

Total phenolsa 0.0026 1.17 0.0026 1.17 ( c)

Total Toxic Organics not regulated for BPT 0.0064 8.29 ( d)

Copper 0.036 4.63 0.0036 4.63 ( c)

Lead 0.0034 4.3 0.0022 4.3 ( c)

Zinc 0.0037 6.17 0.0025 4.74 ( c)

pH 7.0 10.0 Not regulated a Phenols not regulated at BPT for casting cleaning and quench, investment casting, mold cooling, or slag quench. b NSPS c BAT, NSPS, PSES, PSNS d PSES AND PSNS Comment on 304 plan noted the discrepancy of metal limits between the metal molding and casting industry and the metal finishing industry ( molding and casting are orders of magnitude lower). A summary of metal molding and casting treatment effectiveness concentrations and the metal finishing limits are provided in the following table.

Table C 2. Summary of Metal Molding and Casting Option 3 Concentrations and Metal Finishing Effluent Limitations Pollutant Metal Molding and Casting Option 3 ( BAT) Effluent 30 Day average ( mg/ l) Metal Finishing Effluent Limitations 30 Day average ( mg/ l) Ferrous Subcategory Nonferrous Subcategory Copper 0.065 0.17 2.07a Lead 0.15 0.15 0.43a Pollutant Metal Molding and Casting Option 3 ( BAT) Effluent 30 Day average ( mg/ l) Metal Finishing Effluent Limitations 30 Day average ( mg/ l) Ferrous Subcategory Nonferrous Subcategory FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 31 of 52 Zinc 0.26 0.18 1.48a TSS 2.6 2.6 31b Oil and grease 5 5 26b Phenol 0.20 0.20 31b a PSES b BPT FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 32 of 52 Attachment D PCS Discharges SIC NPID NAME CITY Flow( M GD) LBS/ YR TWPE Percent of Total SIC TWPE Cumulative Percent of Total SIC TWPE 3321 TX0001465 RANSOM INDUSTRIES LP TYLER 3 1,489,733 4,509 88% 88%

3321 OH0004901 BURNHAM CORPORATION ZANESVILLE 1 4,703 211 4% 93%

3321 IL0001830 CATERPILLAR INC. MAPLETON MAPLETON 23 130,886 199 4% 96%

3321 OH0002666 GENERAL MOTORS CORP. DEFIANCE 1 43,909 179 4% 100%

3321 TOTAL 28 1,669,232 5,099 3325 KY0100153 STEEL TECHNOLOGIES INC GHENT GHENT 0.16 453,778 16 69% 69%

3325 NJ0004049 FLOWSERVE CORP/ INGERSOLL RAND PHILLIPSBURG 2 94,742 7 31% 100%

3325 TOTAL 2 548,521 23 3365 IN0003573 G. M. CORP. POWERTRAIN DIV. BEDFORD 0.25 2,327 709 100% 100%

3365 KY0001864 INVENSYS PRECISION DIE CASTING RUSSELLVILLE 0 33,263 2 3365 TOTAL 0 35,590 711 FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 33 of 52 Attachment E TRI Discharges SIC Code Facility TRI ID Facility Name Facility City Facility State Direct lbs Direct TWPE Indirect lbs Indirect TWPE Total lbs Total TWPE Percent Total of SIC TWPE Cumulative Percent Total of SIC TWPE 3321 16335DVNCDPOBOX ADVANCED CAST PRODS. INC. MEADVILLE PA 87,067 29,144 87,067 29,144 70% 70%

3321 14901KNNDY1021E KENNEDY VALVE ELMIRA NY 4,500 6,531 163 253 4,663 6,784 16% 87%

3321 61547CTRPL8826W CATERPILLAR INC. MAPLETON PLANT MAPLETON IL 3,365 1,452 3,365 1,452 4% 90%

3321 54981WPCFN406ND WAUPACA FNDY.

INC. PLANT 1 WAUPACA WI 1,025 730 1,025 730 2% 92%

3321 54981WPCFNTOWER WAUPACA FNDY.

INC. PLANT 2/ 3 WAUPACA WI 780 585 780 585 1% 93%

3321 54143WPCFN805OD WAUPACA FNDY.

INC. PLANT 4 MARINETTE WI 1,285 349 15 6 1,300 355 1% 94%

3321 46580THDLTCORNE DALTON CORP. WARSAW IN 2,153 261 2,153 261 1% 95%

3321 24505LYNCHRT726 INTERMET ARCHER CREEK FNDY. LYNCHBURG VA 2,010 259 4 1 2,014 260 1% 96%

3321 53511BLTCR1401E PRIME CAST INC. BELOIT WI 765 207 1 1 766 208 1% 96%

3321 54110BRLLN200PA BRILLION IRON WORKS INC. BRILLION WI 525 189 525 189 0% 97%

3321 30458GRNNLHIGHW ANVIL INTL. STATESBORO GA 510 178 510 178 0% 97% SIC Code Facility TRI ID Facility Name Facility City Facility State Direct lbs Direct TWPE Indirect lbs Indirect TWPE Total lbs Total TWPE Percent Total of SIC TWPE Cumulative Percent Total of SIC TWPE FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 34 of 52 3321 44142FRDMT5600H FORD MOTOR CO.

CLEVELAND CASTING BROOK PARK OH 2,357 158 2,357 158 0% 97%

3321 48605SGNWG1629N GMC POWERTRAIN SAGINAW METAL CASTING OPS. SAGINAW MI 2,686 134 2,686 134 0% 98%

3321 43512GMC STATE GMC POWERTRAIN DEFIANCE DEFIANCE OH 18,670 98 836 21 19,506 119 0% 98%

3321 46241CHRYS1100S INDIANAPOLIS FNDY. INDIANAPOLIS IN 1,667 99 1,667 99 0% 98%

3321 37343WHLND2800S NORTH AMERICAN ROYALTIES INC.

WHELAND FNDY.

DIV. CHATTANOOGA TN 7 0.37 2,743 67 2,750 68 0% 98%

3321 47374SLVCS2153W PERFECT CIRCLE DIV. DANA CORP.

RICHMOND LINER FND RICHMOND IN 286 60 286 60 0% 99%

3321 63448CPRFN700NO LAGRANGE FNDY.

INC. LA GRANGE MO 770 57 14 2 784 58 0% 99%

3321 75710TYLRPHIGHW TYLER PIPE CO. TYLER TX 107 56 107 56 0% 99%

3321 18042VCTLC4901K VICTAULIC CO. OF AMERICA FORKS FACILITY EASTON PA 73 44 73 44 0% 99%

3321 30828WHLND1117T WHELAND AUTOMOTIVE INDS. WARRENTON GA 1,015 42 1,015 42 0% 99%

3321 61605CTRPL2411W CATERPILLAR INC. SEAL RING MAPLETON IL 391 41 391 41 0% 99% SIC Code Facility TRI ID Facility Name Facility City Facility State Direct lbs Direct TWPE Indirect lbs Indirect TWPE Total lbs Total TWPE Percent Total of SIC TWPE Cumulative Percent Total of SIC TWPE FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 35 of 52 3321 46706BRNFN63563 AUBURN FNDY.

INC. AUBURN IN 30 2 320 34 350 36 0% 99%

3321 24141LYNCHFIRST INTERMET RADFORD FNDY. RADFORD VA 470 32 470 32 0% 99%

3321 51501GRFFN2601W GRIFFIN PIPE PRODS. CO. COUNCIL BLUFFS IA 14 31 14 31 0% 99%

3321 24505GRFFNADAMS GRIFFIN PIPE PRODS. CO. LYNCHBURG VA 255 12 244 19 499 31 0% 99%

3321 47394MCCST900NM OMCO CAST METALS WINCHESTER IN 260 28 260 28 0% 99%

3321 31995CLMBS1600N INTERMET COLUMBUS FNDY.

INC. COLUMBUS GA 11,381 26 11,381 26 0% 100%

3321 16501MC 603W1 GUNITE EMI CORP. ERIE PA 265 22 715 1 980 23 0% 100%

3321 62521WGNRC1275E INTERMET DECATUR FNDY. DECATUR IL 39 19 39 19 0% 100%

3321 44460QKRCT310EU QUAKER CITY CASTINGS INC. SALEM OH 160 18 160 18 0% 100%

3321 19545BYRTW9THRO BOYERTOWN FNDY. CO. NEW BERLINVILLE PA 255 18 255 18 0% 100%

3321 48048NWHVN58391 NEW HAVEN FNDY. NEW HAVEN MI 9 17 9 17 0% 100%

3321 54956NNHFN2121B NEENAH FNDY.

CO. NEENAH WI 131 10 88 5 219 15 0% 100%

3321 94587NTDST1295W U. S. PIPE & FNDY.

CO. INC. UNION CITY CA 470 11 73 3 543 14 0% 100%

3321 49431GRTLK800NW GREAT LAKES CASTINGS CORP. LUDINGTON MI 156 11 156 11 0% 100%

3321 52577CLWVLOLDHW CLOW VALVE CO.

FNDY. OSKALOOSA IA 9 10 9 10 0% 100% SIC Code Facility TRI ID Facility Name Facility City Facility State Direct lbs Direct TWPE Indirect lbs Indirect TWPE Total lbs Total TWPE Percent Total of SIC TWPE Cumulative Percent Total of SIC TWPE FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 36 of 52 3321 16125HDGFN42LEE SVEDALA GRINDING HODGE FNDY. GREENVILLE PA 56 8 56 8 0% 100%

3321 36201MHVLV605WE M & H VALVE CO. ANNISTON AL 35 5 35 5 0% 100%

3321 35023NTDST2023S UNITED STATES PIPE & FNDY. CO. BESSEMER AL 2,380 5 2,380 5 0% 100%

3321 44036LYRFN120FI ELYRIA FNDY. ELYRIA OH 15 4 15 4 0% 100%

3321 53581RCHLNFOUND RICHLAND CENTER FNDY. RICHLAND CENTER WI 7 3 7 3 0% 100%

3321 55413PRSPC1225W PROSPECT FNDY.

INC. MINNEAPOLIS MN 7 2 7 2 0% 100%

3321 08016SPPFNEASTP U. S. PIPE & FNDY.

CO. BURLINGTON NJ 1,645 2 1,645 2 0% 100%

3321 47202CWCTX1616T GOLDEN CASTING CORP. COLUMBUS IN 9 2 9 2 0% 100%

3321 46706BRNFN2278C AUBURN FNDY.

INC. PLANT # 2 AUBURN IN 20 1 13 1 33 2 0% 100%

3321 92627GRSWL1701P GRISWOLD INDS. COSTA MESA CA 7 2 7 2 0% 100%

3321 55746NRTHR555WE NORTHERN CASTINGS CORP. HIBBING MN 1 1 1 1 0% 100%

3321 49441CWCCS2672H TEXTRON AUTOMOTIVE FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTSCWC DIV. MUSKEGON MI 7 1 7 1 0% 100%

3321 41008DYTNW5212H MERITOR HVBS CARROLLTON CASTING CENTER CARROLLTON KY 1 1 1 1 0% 100%

3321 44903MNSFL500NO CITATION MANSFIELD MANSFIELD OH 1 1 1 1 0% 100% SIC Code Facility TRI ID Facility Name Facility City Facility State Direct lbs Direct TWPE Indirect lbs Indirect TWPE Total lbs Total TWPE Percent Total of SIC TWPE Cumulative Percent Total of SIC TWPE FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 37 of 52 3321 45638RNTNR2520S INTERMET CORP.

IRONTON IRON INC. IRONTON OH 1 1 1 1 0% 100%

3321 56303MNTRN711AN GREDE  ST.

CLOUD FNDY.

INC. SAINT CLOUD MN 381 1 381 1 0% 100%

3321 45804WHMC 1600M WHEMCO OHIO FNDY. DIV. INC. LIMA OH 4 0.43 4 0.43 0% 100%

3321 41031GRDFNNEWLA GREDE FOUNDRIES INC.

GREDE PERM CAST CYNTHIANA KY 4 0.38 4 0.38 0% 100%

3321 45640SCNDSATHEN OSCO IND. INC.

JACKSON DIV. JACKSON OH 5 0.35 5 0.35 0% 100%

3321 18011VCTLC8023Q VICTAULIC CO. OF AMERICA ALBURTIS FACILITY ALBURTIS PA 3 0.34 3 0.34 0% 100%

3321 49601CMCST23010 HAYES LEMMERZ INTL. INC. CADILLAC INC. CADILLAC MI 249 0.20 249 0.20 0% 100%

3321 28208CHRLT1335S CHARLOTTE PIPE & FNDY. CO. CHARLOTTE NC 102 0.15 102 0.15 0% 100%

3321 49224HRVRD601NO HAYES ALBION CORP. ALBION MI 4 0.11 4 0.11 0% 100%

3321 36201SCSTN1831F U. S. PIPE & FNDY.

CO. INC. U. S.

CASTINGS DIV. ANNISTON AL 1 0.07 1 0.07 0% 100%

3321 43812CLWWT2266S CLOW WATER SYS. CO. COSHOCTON OH 11 0.02 11 0.02 0% 100% SIC Code Facility TRI ID Facility Name Facility City Facility State Direct lbs Direct TWPE Indirect lbs Indirect TWPE Total lbs Total TWPE Percent Total of SIC TWPE Cumulative Percent Total of SIC TWPE FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 38 of 52 3321 08865TLNTC183SI ATLANTIC STATES CAST IRON PIPE CO. PHILLIPSBURG NJ 8 0.02 8 0.02 0% 100%

3321 Total 156,113 41,393 3322 17512GRNNL1411L ANVIL INTL. INC. COLUMBIA PA 20 45 20 45 91% 91%

3322 06786ZGDNYMAINS O Z/ GEDNEY L. L. C. TERRYVILLE CT 86 4 86 4 8% 99%

3322 53172PPLTN2105S EGS ELECTRICAL GROUP APPLETON SOUTH MILWAUKEE WI 5 0.35 5 0.35 1% 100%

3322 Total 111 49 3324 97206LRGST4600S PCC STRUCTURALS INC. LARGE PARTS CAMPUS PORTLAND OR 20 2 63,590 46 63,610 48 33% 33%

3324 46580MDCST596EA MED CAST INC. WARSAW IN 294 29 294 29 20% 53%

3324 46350RMTLSPOBOX AERO METALS INC. LA PORTE IN 41 22 41 22 15% 68%

3324 97015SMLLS13340 PCC STRUCTURALS INC. SMALL STRUCTURALS BUSINESS OP CLACKAMAS OR 20 2 162 18 182 19 13% 82%

3324 53209STNLS5150N STAINLESS FNDY.

& ENG. INC. MILWAUKEE WI 15 4 9 1 24 5 4% 85%

3324 53223SGNCS9000N SIGNICAST CORP. MILWAUKEE WI 66 5 66 5 4% 89%

3324 36201STHRNHIGHW SOUTHERN TOOL INC. OXFORD AL 12 2 12 2 2% 90%

3324 97045PDMNF13963 PED MFG. LTD. OREGON CITY OR 15 1 8 1 23 2 2% 92%

3324 85043DLPHN740SO DOLPHIN INC. PHOENIX AZ 12 2 12 2 1% 93% SIC Code Facility TRI ID Facility Name Facility City Facility State Direct lbs Direct TWPE Indirect lbs Indirect TWPE Total lbs Total TWPE Percent Total of SIC TWPE Cumulative Percent Total of SIC TWPE FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 39 of 52 3324 78702PRCST2110E PURE CASTINGS CO. AUSTIN TX 3 2 3 2 1% 95%

3324 60101FNSTL21NCH FANSTEEL ESCAST ADDISON IL 6 2 6 2 1% 96%

3324 89706SRRCS2727L WGIC SIERRA CAST CARSON CITY NV 9 2 9 2 1% 97%

3324 17067CMQKR640SC TECH CAST INC. MYERSTOWN PA 10 1 4 0.43 14 1 1% 98%

3324 91745TLDYN16800 TELEDYNE CAST PARTS INDUSTRY OPS. CITY OF INDUSTRY CA 5 1 3 0.34 8 1 1% 99%

3324 13037GRYSY901EA GRAY SYRACUSE INC. CHITTENANGO NY 8 1 8 1 1% 99%

3324 94577PRCSN414HE WYMAN GORDON CO. SAN LEANDRO CA 4 0.42 4 0.42 0% 99%

3324 53094WSCNS661S1 WISCONSIN INVESTCAST WATERTOWN WI 4 0.40 4 0.40 0% 100%

3324 36830VRMNT155AL VERMONT AMERICAN AUBURN AL 4 0.37 4 0.37 0% 100%

3324 07748NGNRD952PA ENGINEERED PRECISION CASTING CO. MIDDLETOWN NJ 1 0.09 1 0.09 0% 100%

3324 03055HTCHNOLDWI HITCHINER MFG.

CO. INC. MILFORD NH 3 0.0045 28 0.043 31 0.05 0% 100%

3324 Total 64,356 146 3325 38478MRCNM2360I MAGOTTEAUX CORP. PULASKI TN 255 131 8 1 263 132 27% 27%

3325 35222THMSF900NO SVEDALA INDS.

INC. THOMAS DIV. BIRMINGHAM AL 1,260 95 1,260 95 20% 47%

3325 43207BCKYS2211P BUCKEYE STEEL CASTINGS CO. COLUMBUS OH 770 65 770 65 13% 61% SIC Code Facility TRI ID Facility Name Facility City Facility State Direct lbs Direct TWPE Indirect lbs Indirect TWPE Total lbs Total TWPE Percent Total of SIC TWPE Cumulative Percent Total of SIC TWPE FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 40 of 52 3325 47918HRRSN900MO HARRISON STEEL CASTINGS CO. ATTICA IN 265 31 265 31 6% 67%

3325 52722SVYRS225S3 SIVYER STEEL CORP. BETTENDORF IA 270 29 270 29 6% 73%

3325 49441WSTMC1148W WEST MICHIGAN STEEL FNDY. MUSKEGON MI 260 28 260 28 6% 79%

3325 53188WSCNS905EA WISCONSIN CENTRIFUGAL WAUKESHA WI 42 20 42 20 4% 83%

3325 97062DRMTL9560S DURAMETAL CORP. TUALATIN OR 257 19 257 19 4% 87%

3325 62040MRCNS1700W AMERICAN STEEL FOUNDRIES GRANITE CITY IL 262 16 262 16 3% 90%

3325 53404RCNST1442N RACINE STEEL CASTING DIV. RACINE WI 535 12 535 12 2% 92%

3325 45404DRRNC450NO FLOWSERVE CORP. FDRY OPS. DAYTON OH 60 7 60 7 1% 94%

3325 44871SNDSK615WE SANDUSKY INTL.

INC. SANDUSKY OH 11 6 11 6 1% 95%

3325 02184WLLST205WO WOLLASTON ALLOYS INC. BRAINTREE MA 24 6 24 6 1% 96%

3325 98409TLSFN3021S ATLAS FNDY. &

MACHINE CO. TACOMA WA 20 4 14 2 34 6 1% 97%

3325 76501DLTCN3402C DELTA CENTRIFUGAL CORP. TEMPLE TX 15 3 15 3 1% 98%

3325 17067QKRLLERICH QUAKER ALLOY INC. MYERSTOWN PA 17 2 17 2 0% 99%

3325 55808MNTRN200EA M E INTL. DULUTH MN 31 2 31 2 0% 99%

3325 15059WSTHMONE12 WEST HOMESTEAD ENG. & MACHINE CO. MIDLAND PA 14 1 14 1 0% 99% SIC Code Facility TRI ID Facility Name Facility City Facility State Direct lbs Direct TWPE Indirect lbs Indirect TWPE Total lbs Total TWPE Percent Total of SIC TWPE Cumulative Percent Total of SIC TWPE FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 41 of 52 3325 35055MRCNL1725O AMERICAN ALLOY PRODS. INC. CULLMAN AL 10 1 10 1 0% 99%

3325 66002RCKWL4THAN ATCHISON STEEL CASTING & MACHINING ATCHISON KS 1 1 0.28 0.17 1 1 0% 99%

3325 53186WKSHF1300L WAUKESHA FNDY.

CO. INC. WAUKESHA WI 2 1 2 1 0% 100%

3325 36605MBLPL905SO MOBILE PULLEY &

MACHINE WORKS MOBILE AL 9 1 9 1 0% 100%

3325 15201MCCNW10948 MCCONWAY &

TORLEY CORP. PITTSBURGH PA 6 1 6 1 0% 100%

3325 15066DMSCSPOBOX DAMASCUS STEEL CASTING CO. NEW BRIGHTON PA 4 0.30 4 0.30 0% 100%

3325 19526PNNSYTHIRD PENNSYLVANIA STEEL FNDY. &

MACHINE CO. HAMBURG PA 3 0.22 3 0.22 0% 100%

3325 15683BLWKNBRIDG DURALOY TECHS.

INC. SCOTTDALE PA 1 0.076 0.47 0.036 1 0.11 0% 100%

3325 75604STHWS600FO SOUTHWEST STEEL CASTING CO. LONGVIEW TX 8 0.016 8 0.02 0% 100%

3325 Total 4,435 483 3364 42420GMCPR11055 GAMCO PRODS.

CO. HENDERSON KY 101 24 101 24 70% 70%

3364 49502KLRBR236ST KEELER DIE CAST GRAND RAPIDS MI 86 4 86 4 12% 83%

3364 60050LLDDC3923W ALLIED DIE CASTING CORP. MC HENRY IL 86 4 86 4 12% 95%

3364 53022RHCSTN114W RHEOCAST CO. GERMANTOWN WI 1 1 1 1 3% 97% SIC Code Facility TRI ID Facility Name Facility City Facility State Direct lbs Direct TWPE Indirect lbs Indirect TWPE Total lbs Total TWPE Percent Total of SIC TWPE Cumulative Percent Total of SIC TWPE FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 42 of 52 3364 63456DMKRS801SE DIVERSIFIED DIEMAKERS ( DBA INTERMET) MONROE CITY MO 1 1 1 1 3% 100%

3364 02861RBCND645NA RIBCO MFG. INC. PAWTUCKET RI 2 0.08 2 0.08 0% 100%

3364 Total 278 33 3365 06082YNKCS243SH YANKEE CASTING CO. INC. ENFIELD CT 750 470 750 470 60% 60%

3365 35222STBRM831NO EAST BIRMINGHAM BRONZE FNDY.

INC BIRMINGHAM AL 255 160 255 160 20% 80%

3365 49247MTLLY103WM METALLOY CORP.

HUDSON FNDY.

DIV. HUDSON MI 73 44 73 44 6% 86%

3365 14094MLWRD500MI MILWARD ALLOYS INC. LOCKPORT NY 2 33 2 33 4% 90%

3365 90058LMNMC5151A PECHINEY CAST PLATE VERNON CA 260 15 3 1 263 16 2% 92%

3365 35094SQRDC940MO ANDERSON ELECTRICAL PRODS. INC. LEEDS AL 16 14 16 14 2% 94%

3365 42452KBLLYMCDON KB ALLOYS INC. ROBARDS KY 10 14 10 14 2% 96%

3365 13662GNRLMPOBOX GMC POWERTRAIN MASSENA MASSENA NY 18 11 18 11 1% 97%

3365 63863FDRLMMALDE FEDERAL MOGUL CORP. MALDEN MO 72 8 8 1 80 9 1% 99%

3365 44030GNRLL1043C GENERAL ALUMINUM MFG.

CO. CONNEAUT OH 10 4 10 4 0% 99% SIC Code Facility TRI ID Facility Name Facility City Facility State Direct lbs Direct TWPE Indirect lbs Indirect TWPE Total lbs Total TWPE Percent Total of SIC TWPE Cumulative Percent Total of SIC TWPE FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 43 of 52 3365 46721BHNPRUSHWY CITATION  BOHN ALUMINUM CORP. BUTLER IN 10 3 10 3 0% 100%

3365 45822CLNLM7059S CELINA ALUMINUM PRECISION TECH. CELINA OH 74 2 74 2 0% 100%

3365 18017HWMTL2175A HOWMET ALUMINUM CASTING INC. BETHLEHEM PA 20 1 20 1 0% 100%

3365 45365RSSLM70781 ROSS ALUMINUM FOUNDRIES II SIDNEY OH 1 1 1 1 0% 100%

3365 Total 1,582 784 3366 60538RRNDS1002G AURORA METALS DIV. L. L. C. MONTGOMERY IL 750 470 750 470 41% 41%

3366 68025MGNSFSOUTH MAGNUS/ FARLEY INC. FREMONT NE 582 275 582 275 24% 65%

3366 19381MTLLR810LI METALLURGICAL PRODS. CO. WEST CHESTER PA 155 91 155 91 8% 73%

3366 29801GRHMB45WIN YORK BRONZE CO. ( DBA GORHAM BRONZE LTD.) AIKEN SC 109 83 3 0.34 112 83 7% 81%

3366 28150CHSBR135OL METALSAMERICA SHELBY NC 401 81 401 81 7% 88%

3366 26537SHDWBSISLE YORK BRONZE CO. ( DBA SHEIDOW BRONZE CORP.) KINGWOOD WV 34 19 12 6 46 25 2% 90%

3366 03235WBSTRSOMAI WEBSTER FNDY.

CO. FRANKLIN NH 20 15 7 5 27 20 2% 92% SIC Code Facility TRI ID Facility Name Facility City Facility State Direct lbs Direct TWPE Indirect lbs Indirect TWPE Total lbs Total TWPE Percent Total of SIC TWPE Cumulative Percent Total of SIC TWPE FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 44 of 52 3366 35215LBMCP1501R ALABAMA COPPER &

BRONZE CO. INC. BIRMINGHAM AL 26 16 26 16 1% 93%

3366 72143MTTHW501LI MATTHEWS INTL.

CORP. SEARCY AR 10 14 10 14 1% 94%

3366 39567BRDJH3719I ROLLS ROYCE NAVAL MARINE INC. PASCAGOULA MS 32 12 32 12 1% 95%

3366 44864MNSFL150FI MANSFIELD PLUMBING PRODS. L. L. C. PERRYSVILLE OH 31 12 31 12 1% 96%

3366 85714KNGHT420EA TUCSON FNDY. &

MFG. INC. TUCSON AZ 8 7 8 7 1% 97%

3366 03061BRNZCSIMON BRONZE CRAFT CORP. NASHUA NH 10 6 10 6 1% 98%

3366 36202LBRSSGOLDE LEE BRASS CO. ANNISTON AL 5 5 5 5 0% 98%

3366 44052MRCNC305OB JOHNSON METALL INC. LORAIN OH 3 5 3 5 0% 98%

3366 26003HBCNC21418 HUBCO BRONZE INC. WHEELING WV 10 4 4 1 14 5 0% 99%

3366 16506RBRNZ6300W ERIE BRONZE &

ALUMINUM ERIE PA 10 4 10 4 0% 99%

3366 22980VRGNM1010E VIRGINIA METALCRAFTERS INC. WAYNESBORO VA 5 3 5 3 0% 99%

3366 64501NTNLL1304W NATIONAL ALUMINUM BRASS FNDY. INC. INDEPENDENC E MO 5 3 5 3 0% 100%

3366 26537YRKBRKINNE YORK BRONZE WEST ANNEX FACILITY KINGWOOD WV 1 1 1 1 0% 100% SIC Code Facility TRI ID Facility Name Facility City Facility State Direct lbs Direct TWPE Indirect lbs Indirect TWPE Total lbs Total TWPE Percent Total of SIC TWPE Cumulative Percent Total of SIC TWPE FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 45 of 52 3366 60005MGNCS1117E AMPCO METAL INC. ARLINGTON HEIGHTS IL 1 1 1 1 0% 100%

3366 65265CRRCP1500I CERRO COPPER CASTING CO. MEXICO MO 1 1 0.28 0.17 1 1 0% 100%

3366 37874NGKMT917ST NGK METALS CORP. SWEETWATER TN 0.28 0.17 0.28 0.17 0% 100%

3366 Total 2,235 1,140 3369 35096LNCLNRAILR LINCOLN METALS CORP. LINCOLN AL 513 322 513 322 28% 28%

3369 62223CNTRY1300N CENTURY CASTINGS CORP. SWANSEA IL 265 171 74 48 339 219 19% 47%

3369 93277MNC00401EC EMI INC. VISALIA CA 255 160 1 1 256 161 14% 61%

3369 37406STHRN4106S SOUTHERN CENTRIFUGAL DIV. CHATTANOOGA TN 255 160 255 160 14% 75%

3369 46992THFRD775MA FORD METER BOX CO. INC. WABASH IN 114 117 15 20 129 137 12% 87%

3369 49461HWMTCONEMI HOWMET CORP.

WHITEHALL CASTINGS WHITEHALL MI 520 56 520 56 5% 91%

3369 76307HWMTC6200C HOWMET CORP. WICHITA FALLS TX 20 2 391 41 411 43 4% 95%

3369 23661HWMTCONEH O HOWMET CORP. HAMPTON VA 2,235 11 2,235 11 1% 96%

3369 53080JHNSN270NM JOHNSON BRASS & MACHINE SAUKVILLE WI 15 9 15 9 1% 97%

3369 49461HWMTC3850W HOWMET CORP.

PLANT 10 WHITEHALL MI 54 6 54 6 0% 97%

3369 68305MGNLMMAGN O MAGNOLIA METAL CORP. AUBURN NE 5 5 5 5 0% 98% SIC Code Facility TRI ID Facility Name Facility City Facility State Direct lbs Direct TWPE Indirect lbs Indirect TWPE Total lbs Total TWPE Percent Total of SIC TWPE Cumulative Percent Total of SIC TWPE FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 46 of 52 3369 44902GLPCH153EA BUNTING BEARINGS CORP. MANSFIELD OH 6 4 2 1 8 5 0% 98%

3369 80517RCKRB2050B RICKER BARTLETT INC.

MICHAEL RICKER PEWTER ( DBA) ESTES PARK CO 2 4 2 4 0% 99%

3369 44432LBCFN230WM ALBCO FOUNDRY INC. LISBON OH 5 3 5 3 0% 99%

3369 97321MTTNM150QU PACIFIC CAST TECHS. INC. ALBANY OR 42,372 3 42,372 3 0% 99%

3369 97222PCCDR13350 PCC STRUCTURALS INC. DEER CREEK ANNEX MILWAUKIE OR 15 1 8 1 23 2 0% 99%

3369 49417GRNDH230NO GRAND HAVEN BRASS FNDY. GRAND HAVEN MI 1 2 1 2 0% 99%

3369 90280TCHNC11220 TECHNI CAST CORP. SOUTH GATE CA 7 1 7 1 0% 100%

3369 90032RRWHD5142A ARROWHEAD BRASS PRODS.

INC. LOS ANGELES CA 10 1 10 1 0% 100%

3369 33634CHRML7030A CHROMALLOY CASTINGS TAMPA TAMPA FL 8 1 8 1 0% 100%

3369 46350HWMTC1110E HOWMET CORP. LA PORTE IN 8 1 8 1 0% 100%

3369 94590DGSSL403RY TIMET VALLEJO CA 8 1 8 1 0% 100%

3369 48823SPRRB4893D SUPERIOR BRASS & ALUMINUM CASTING CO. EAST LANSING MI 2 1 2 1 0% 100%

3369 97756PCCSC345NE PCC STRUCTURALS INC. SCHLOSSER REDMOND OR 7,134 0.44 7,134 0.44 0% 100% SIC Code Facility TRI ID Facility Name Facility City Facility State Direct lbs Direct TWPE Indirect lbs Indirect TWPE Total lbs Total TWPE Percent Total of SIC TWPE Cumulative Percent Total of SIC TWPE FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 47 of 52 3369 95037DGSSC16035 UNAXIS MATERIALS INC. MORGAN HILL CA 1 0.09 1 0.09 0% 100%

3369 49461HWMTC1600S HOWMET CORP.

PLANT 5 WHITEHALL MI 988 988  0% 100%

3369 Total 55,308 1,154 FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 48 of 52 Attachment F Reported Pollutant Loadings SIC Pollutant Name CAS Pollutan t Group Code PCS Facilities Reportin g Pollutant PCS Pounds PCS TWPE TRI Indirect Facilities Reporting Pollutant TRI Indirect Discharge Pounds TRI Indirect Discharge TWPE TRI Direct Facilities Reporting Pollutant TRI Direct Pounds TRI Direct TWPE 3321 OIL AND GREASE C035 CP 4 130,723 3321 BOD 5 DAY ( CARBONACEOUS) C003 CP 4 7,540 3321 TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS C009 CP 4 43,001 3321 SUM OF CONVENTIONAL POLLUTANTS 181,264 0 0 0 0 0 3321 CRESOL ( MIXED ISOMERS) 1319773 NC 1 1 0.0049 1 24 0.11 3321 NITROGEN, NITRATE TOTAL ( AS N) 14797558 NC 3 10,280 1 1 14,000 1 3321 N METHYL 2 PYRROLIDONE 872504 NC 1 1,112 1 1 3321 MOLYBDENUM 7439987 NC 1 517 104 3321 METHANOL 67561 NC 1 0.16 0.0000015 1 8 0.000074 3321 MANGANESE 7439965 NC 16 5,810 409 20 3,521 248 3321 IRON 7439896 NC 1 142 1 3321 HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM 18540299 NC 1 70 36 3321 GLYCOL ETHERS N230 NC 1 1,350 0.14 3321 FORMALDEHYDE 50000 NC 2 140 0.32 1 460 1 3321 ETHYLENE GLYCOL 107211 NC 4 2,740 4 1 3 0.0040 3321 1,2,4 TRIMETHYLBENZENE 95636 NC 1 1 0.023 3321 DIETHANOLAMINE 111422 NC 1 11,366 20 3321 MOLYBDENUM TRIOXIDE 1313275 NC 1 249 0.20 3321 SODIUM NITRITE 7632000 NC 1 78,062 29,143 3321 COBALT 7440484 NC 2 177 20 1 5 1 3321 TOTAL RECOVERABLE C020 NC 4 183 5 SIC Pollutant Name CAS Pollutan t Group Code PCS Facilities Reportin g Pollutant PCS Pounds PCS TWPE TRI Indirect Facilities Reporting Pollutant TRI Indirect Discharge Pounds TRI Indirect Discharge TWPE TRI Direct Facilities Reporting Pollutant TRI Direct Pounds TRI Direct TWPE FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 49 of 52 PHENOLICS 3321 CHLORINE, TOTAL RESIDUAL 7782505 NC 3 794 387 1 2,600 1,266 3321 CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ( COD) C004 NC 1 1,474,783 3321 TRIETHYLAMINE 121448 NC 1 1 0.00015 3321 BARIUM 7440393 NC 2 20 0.040 5 2,909 6 3321 AMMONIA AS NITROGEN 7664417 NC 2 44 0.081 2 664 1 1 3,000 5 3321 ALUMINUM 7429905 NC 4 153 10 3 15 1 3321 SUM OF NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANTS 1,476,533 533 112,123 29,608 26,547 1,528 3321 PHENOL 108952 PP 1 62 2 8 207 6 13 2,189 61 3321 ZINC 7440666 PP 4 8,280 387 10 1,882 88 8 1,603 75 3321 SELENIUM 7782492 PP 1 4 4 3321 NICKEL 7440020 PP 17 849 92 15 1,129 123 3321 MERCURY 7439976 PP 1 0.041 5 3321 LEAD 7439921 PP 3 1,705 3,820 6 129 288 7 2,837 6,355 3321 CYANIDE 57125 PP 1 5 5 1 18 0.046 3321 COPPER 7440508 PP 4 526 329 19 499 313 27 3,901 2,446 3321 CHROMIUM 7440473 PP 1 65 5 15 324 33 13 1,810 365 3321 CADMIUM 7440439 PP 1 1 2 3321 BIS( 2 ETHYLHEXYL)

PHTHALATE 117817 PP 1 96 9 3321 BENZENE 71432 PP 1 0.12 0.0022 1 8 0.15 3321 NAPHTHALENE 91203 PP 2 1 0.019 1 16 0.25 3321 SUM OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS 10,742 4,566 3,911 823 13,493 9,425 3322 MANGANESE 7439965 NC 1 5 0.35 3322 SUM OF NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANTS 0 0 0 0 5 0 3322 ZINC 7440666 PP 1 86 4 3322 LEAD 7439921 PP 1 20 45 3322 SUM OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS 0 0 86 4 20 45 SIC Pollutant Name CAS Pollutan t Group Code PCS Facilities Reportin g Pollutant PCS Pounds PCS TWPE TRI Indirect Facilities Reporting Pollutant TRI Indirect Discharge Pounds TRI Indirect Discharge TWPE TRI Direct Facilities Reporting Pollutant TRI Direct Pounds TRI Direct TWPE FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 50 of 52 3324 ALUMINUM 7429905 NC 1 5 0.32 3324 AMMONIA AS NITROGEN 7664417 NC 1 28 0.043 1 3 0.0045 3324 COBALT 7440484 NC 10 371 42 4 20 2 3324 MANGANESE 7439965 NC 5 17 1 3324 NITROGEN, NITRATE TOTAL ( AS N) 14797558 NC 1 63,195 4 3324 SUM OF NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANTS 0 0 63,611 48 28 3 3324 CHROMIUM 7440473 PP 15 254 21 7 28 2 3324 COPPER 7440508 PP 6 40 25 2 8 5 3324 NICKEL 7440020 PP 14 352 38 8 35 4 3324 SUM OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS 0 0 646 84 71 11 3325 TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS C009 CP 2 37,057 3325 OIL AND GREASE C035 CP 1 2,025 3325 SUM OF CONVENTIONAL POLLUTANTS 39,082 0 0 0 0 0 3325 CHLORIDE 16887006 NC 1 368,647 9 3325 ALUMINUM 7429905 NC 1 750 48 3325 BARIUM 7440393 NC 2 13 0.026 3325 XYLENE 1330207 NC 1 0.072 0.00030 1 5 0.021 3325 CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ( COD) C004 NC 1 58,995 3325 CUMENE 98828 NC 1 5 0.013 3325 IRON 7439896 NC 1 1,242 7 3325 TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ( AS SGT HEM C037 NC 1 6,976 3325 MANGANESE 7439965 NC 8 193 14 11 577 41 3325 MOLYBDENUM TRIOXIDE 1313275 NC 1 5 0.0039 3 15 0.012 3325 SUM OF NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANTS 435,859 16 198 14 1,365 89 3325 BENZENE 71432 PP 1 0.017 0.00032 SIC Pollutant Name CAS Pollutan t Group Code PCS Facilities Reportin g Pollutant PCS Pounds PCS TWPE TRI Indirect Facilities Reporting Pollutant TRI Indirect Discharge Pounds TRI Indirect Discharge TWPE TRI Direct Facilities Reporting Pollutant TRI Direct Pounds TRI Direct TWPE FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 51 of 52 3325 ZINC 7440666 PP 1 5 0.25 1 86 4 3325 TOLUENE 108883 PP 1 0.032 0.00018 3325 PHENOL 108952 PP 3 21 1 2 260 7 3325 NAPHTHALENE 91203 PP 1 0.37 0.0057 1 255 4 3325 LEAD 7439921 PP 1 3 7 2 7 15 3325 COPPER 7440508 PP 1 1 0.35 6 18 11 4 14 9 3325 NICKEL 7440020 PP 8 74 8 12 1,301 142 3325 CHROMIUM 7440473 PP 7 22 3 14 809 177 3364 ZINC 7440666 PP 3 174 8 3364 COPPER 7440508 PP 3 29 18 3364 CYANIDE 57125 PP 1 2 0.0052 3364 NICKEL 7440020 PP 1 49 5 3364 CHROMIUM 7440473 PP 1 24 2 3364 SUM OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS 10 8 506 75 2,639 339 3365 OIL AND GREASE C035 CP 1 713 3365 TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS C009 CP 2 11,366 3365 BOD 5 DAY ( CARBONACEOUS) C003 CP 1 1,237 3365 SUM OF CONVENTIONAL POLLUTANTS 13,317 0 0 0 0 0 3365 CHLORINE, TOTAL RESIDUAL 7782505 NC 1 24 11 3365 ALUMINUM 7429905 NC 1 20 1 3365 PHOSPHORUS 7723140 NC 1 2 33 3365 MANGANESE 7439965 NC 1 3 0.22 1 51 4 3365 AMMONIA AS NITROGEN 7664417 NC 1 263 0.48 3365 SUM OF NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANTS 287 12 5 34 71 5 3365 ZINC 7440666 PP 1 98 5 1 2 0.079 2 260 12 3365 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS ( PCBS) 1336363 PP 1 0.053 677 SIC Pollutant Name CAS Pollutan t Group Code PCS Facilities Reportin g Pollutant PCS Pounds PCS TWPE TRI Indirect Facilities Reporting Pollutant TRI Indirect Discharge Pounds TRI Indirect Discharge TWPE TRI Direct Facilities Reporting Pollutant TRI Direct Pounds TRI Direct TWPE FINAL DRAFT Metal Molding August 16, 2004 Page 52 of 52 3365 COPPER 7440508 PP 1 6 3 5 77 48 9 1,059 664 3365 LEAD 7439921 PP 1 6 14 2 8 18 3365 NICKEL 7440020 PP 2 6 1 3 23 3 3365 SUM OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS 110 699 85 49 1,350 696 3366 PHOSPHORUS 7723140 NC 1 0 0 3366 COBALT 7440484 NC 1 173 20 3366 MANGANESE 7439965 NC 2 20 1 3366 SUM OF NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANTS 0 0 173 20 20 1 3366 ZINC 7440666 PP 5 95 4 4 36 2 3366 NICKEL 7440020 PP 6 325 35 5 25 3 3366 LEAD 7439921 PP 7 101 226 6 26 58 3366 COPPER 7440508 PP 12 160 100 15 1,099 689 3366 ANTIMONY 7440360 PP 1 175 1 3366 SUM OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS 0 0 856 367 1,186 752 3369 COBALT 7440484 NC 8 400 46 2 10 1 3369 HYDROGEN FLUORIDE 7664393 NC 1 988 3369 NITRIC ACID 7697372 NC 2 0 3369 NITROGEN, NITRATE TOTAL ( AS N) 14797558 NC 3 51,639 3 3369 ALUMINUM 7429905 NC 1 5 0.32 3369 SUM OF NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANTS 0 0 53,027 49 15 1 3369 ZINC 7440666 PP 2 3 0.16 2 10 0.47 3369 CHROMIUM 7440473 PP 9 142 11 2 10 1 3369 COPPER 7440508 PP 7 83 52 10 1,393 873 3369 LEAD 7439921 PP 5 13 29 2 33 74 3369 NICKEL 7440020 PP 10 567 62 3 11 1 3369 SUM OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS 0 0 808 154 1,457 950


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 61 (Tuesday, March 31, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 17119]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07422]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, April
2, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting.
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Piwowar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session, and determined that no
earlier notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the
Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 26, 2015.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-07422 Filed 3-27-15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: December 29, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 250)]
[Notices]
[Page 78419]
[DOCID:fr29de06-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AC06-153-000]

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Filing

December 21, 2006.
    Take notice that on September 7, 2006, Transcontinental Gas Pipe
Line Corporation (Transco) submitted a filing containing a proposal for
revising its methodology for calculating natural gas inventories and
valuation of gas imbalances. On September 18, 2006, Transco filed an
attachment to the September 7, 2006 filing that was omitted. On October
18, 2006, Transco filed a request to use Account 439, Adjustments to
retained earnings, in connection with Transco restatement of its 2004
FERC Form 2.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 pm Eastern Time on January 4, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-22372 Filed 12-28-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P