[Federal Register: October 16, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 201)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 61372-61375]
[DOCID:fr16oc08-22]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-1079; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-116-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model EMB-135ER, -135KE, -135KL, and -135LR Airplanes, and
Model EMB-145, -145ER, -145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -145MP, and -145EP
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This
proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The
MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    Fuel system reassessment, performed according to RBHA-E88/SFAR-
88 (Regulamento Brasileiro de Homologacao Aeronautica 88/Special
Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88), requires the inclusion of new
maintenance tasks in the Critical Design Configuration Control
Limitations (CDCCL) and in the Fuel System Limitations (FSL),
necessary to preclude ignition sources in the fuel system. * * *.

    The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address
the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 17,
2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations

office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1405; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-1079;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-116-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On June 13, 2008, we issued AD 2008-13-14, Amendment 39-15577 (73
FR 35904, June 25, 2008). That AD requires actions intended to address
an unsafe condition on the products listed above.
    The preamble to AD 2008-13-14 explains that we were considering
further rulemaking to address tasks 28-41-01-720-001-A00 and 28-41-04-
720-001-A00 because the tasks are related to a functional check of the
component rather than the aircraft system. Those tasks are specified in
EMBRAER EMB135/ERJ140/EMB145 Maintenance Review Board Report MRB-145/
1150, Revision 11, dated September 19, 2007 (which we referred to as
the appropriate source of service information for the existing AD). We
now have determined that further rulemaking is indeed necessary, and
this proposed AD follows from that determination. We have proposed to
require those tasks with compliance times based on the component flight
hours in paragraph (g) of this proposed AD.

Removed Reference to ``Later Revisions'' of Service Information

    We have removed the reference to ``later revisions'' of the
applicable service information in paragraph (f)(4) of this AD to be
consistent with FAA policy and Office of the Federal Register
regulations. We might consider approving the use of later revisions of
the service information as an alternative method of compliance with
this AD, as provided by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 668 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $53,440, or $80 per
product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-15577 (73 FR
35904, June 25, 2008) and adding the following new AD:

Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER): Docket No. FAA-
2008-

1079; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-116-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by November 17, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) The proposed AD supersedes AD 2008-13-14, Amendment 39-
15577.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to EMBRAER Model EMB-135ER, -135KE, -135KL,
and -135LR airplanes, and Model EMB-145, -145ER, -145MR, -145LR, -
145XR, -145MP, and -145EP airplanes; certificated in any category;
except for Model EMB-145LR airplanes modified according to Brazilian
Supplemental Type Certificate 2002S06-09, 2002S06-10, or 2003S08-01.

    Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance according
to paragraph (h) of this AD. The request should include a
description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure
the continued operational safety of the airplane.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    Fuel system reassessment, performed according to RBHA-E88/SFAR-
88, requires the inclusion of new maintenance tasks in the Critical
Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCL) and in the Fuel
System Limitations (FSL), necessary to preclude ignition sources in
the fuel system. * * *

The corrective action is revising the Airworthiness Limitations
Section (ALS) of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA)
to incorporate new limitations for fuel tank systems.

Restatement of Requirements of AD 2008-13-14

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) The term ``MRBR,'' as used in this AD, means the EMBRAER
EMB135/ERJ140/EMB145 Maintenance Review Board Report (MRBR) MRB-145/
1150, Revision 11, dated September 19, 2007.
    (2) Before December 16, 2008, revise the ALS of the ICA to
incorporate Section A2.5.2, Fuel System Limitation Items, of
Appendix 2 of the MRBR. Except as required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, for all tasks identified in Section A2.5.2 of Appendix 2 of the
MRBR, the initial compliance times start from the applicable times
specified in Table 1 of this AD; and the repetitive inspections must
be accomplished thereafter at the interval specified in Section
A2.5.2 of Appendix 2 of the MRBR, except as provided by paragraphs
(f)(4) and (h) of this AD.

                      Table 1--Initial Inspections
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Compliance time (whichever occurs
                                                    later)
   Reference No.       Description   -----------------------------------
                                          Threshold       Grace period
------------------------------------------------------------------------
28-11-00-720-001-A  Functionally      Before the        Within 90 days
 00.                 Check critical    accumulation of   after December
                     bonding           30,000 total      16, 2008.
                     integrity of      flight hours.
                     selected
                     conduits inside
                     the wing tank,
                     Fuel Pump and
                     FQIS connectors
                     at tank wall by
                     conductivity
                     measurements.
28-17-01-720-001-A  Functionally      Before the        Within 90 days
 00.                 Check critical    accumulation of   after December
                     bonding           30,000 total      16, 2008.
                     integrity of      flight hours.
                     Fuel Pump,
                     VFQIS and Low
                     Level SW
                     connectors at
                     tank wall by
                     conductivity
                     measurements.
28-21-01-220-001-A  Inspect Electric  Before the        Within 90 days
 00.                 Fuel Pump         accumulation of   after December
                     Connector.        10,000 total      16, 2008.
                                       flight hours.
28-23-03-220-001-A  Inspect Pilot     Before the        Within 90 days
 00.                 Valve harness     accumulation of   after December
                     inside the        20,000 total      16, 2008.
                     conduit.          flight hours.
28-23-04-220-001-A  Inspect Vent      Before the        Within 90 days
 00.                 Valve harness     accumulation of   after December
                     inside the        20,000 total      16, 2008.
                     conduit.          flight hours.
28-27-01-220-001-A  Inspect Electric  Before the        Within 90 days
 00.                 Fuel Transfer     accumulation of   after December
                     Pump Connector.   10,000 total      16, 2008.
                                       flight hours.
28-41-03-220-001-A  Inspect FQIS      Before the        Within 90 days
 00.                 harness for       accumulation of   after December
                     clamp and wire    20,000 total      16, 2008.
                     jacket            flight hours.
                     integrity.
28-41-07-220-001-A  Inspect VFQIS     Before the        Within 90 days
 00.                 and Low Level     accumulation of   after December
                     SW Harness for    20,000 total      16, 2008.
                     clamp and wire    flight hours.
                     jacket
                     integrity.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (3) Within 90 days after July 30, 2008 (the effective date of AD
2008-13-14), whichever occurs first, revise the ALS of the ICA to
incorporate items 1, 2, and 3 of Section A2.4, Critical Design
Configuration Control Limitation (CDCCL), of Appendix 2 of the MRBR.
    (4) After accomplishing the actions specified in paragraphs
(f)(2) and (f)(3) of this AD, no alternative inspections, inspection
intervals, or CDCCLs may be used unless the inspections, intervals,
or CDCCLs are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC)
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD.

New Requirements of This AD: Actions and Compliance

    (g) Unless already done, do the following actions:
    (1) For tasks 28-41-01-720-001-A00 and 28-41-04-720-001-A00
identified in Section A2.5.2 of Appendix 2 of the MRBR, do the tasks
at the later of the applicable ``Threshold'' and ``Grace Period''
times specified in Table 2 of this AD; and repeat the inspections
thereafter at the applicable interval specified in Table 2 of this
AD; except as provided by paragraphs (g)(2) and (h) of this AD.

                                              Table 2--Inspections
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         Compliance time (whichever occurs
                                                                      later)                   Repeat inspection
          Reference No.               Description    ----------------------------------------      interval
                                                           Threshold         Grace period
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
28-41-01-720-001-A00............  Functionally Check  Before the          Within 90 days      10,000 flight
                                   Fuel Conditioning   accumulation of     after December      hours on the FCU
                                   Unit (FCU).         10,000 total        16, 2008.           since the last
                                                       flight hours on                         functional check.
                                                       the FCU.
28-41-04-720-001-A00............  Functionally Check  Before the          Within 90 days      10,000 flight
                                   Ventral Fuel        accumulation of     after December      hours on the VFCU
                                   Conditioning Unit   10,000 total        16, 2008.           since the last
                                   (VFCU).             flight hours on                         functional check.
                                                       the VFCU.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (2) After accomplishing the actions specified in paragraphs
(g)(1) of this AD, no alternative inspections, or inspection
intervals, may be used unless the inspections or intervals are
approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows:
    (1) The MCAI specifies a compliance date of ``Before December
31, 2008'' for doing the ALI revisions. We have already issued
regulations that require operators to revise their maintenance/
inspection programs to address fuel tank safety issues. The
compliance date for these regulations is December 16, 2008. To
provide for coordinated implementation of these regulations and this
AD, we are using this same compliance date in this AD.
    (2) EMBRAER EMB135/ERJ140/EMB145 Maintenance Review Board Report
MRB-145/1150, Revision 11, dated September 19, 2007, specifies
compliance times to do tasks 28-41-01-720-001-A00 and 28-41-04-720-
001-A00 for certain components based on flight hours of the
airplane. This AD requires that the tasks be done at compliance
times based on flight hours of the component.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (h) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. Send information to ATTN: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-1405; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (i) Refer to Brazilian Airworthiness Directive 2007-08-02,
effective September 27, 2007; and Sections A2.5.2, Fuel System
Limitation Items, and A2.4, Critical Design Configuration Control
Limitation (CDCCL), of Appendix 2 of the MRBR; for related
information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 25, 2008.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-24582 Filed 10-15-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 54 (Wednesday, March 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 14734]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05602]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2017-N-0001]

Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research Small Business and Industry Assistance Regulatory Education
for Industry Generic Drugs Forum; Public Conference

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of public conference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (CDER) is sponsoring a 2-day public conference
entitled ``FDA CDER Small Business and Industry Assistance (SBIA)
Regulatory Education for Industry (REdI) Generic Drugs Forum.'' The
goal of this public conference is to provide direct, relevant, and
helpful information on the key aspects of the generic drug development
process. Our primary audience is that of small manufacturers within the
generic drug industry. However, anyone involved in the pharmaceutical
industry may attend.

DATES: The public conference will be held April 4-5, 2017, from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
registration information.

ADDRESSES: The public conference will be held in the Pinnacle Ballroom
located on the 2nd floor of DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel, 8727 Colesville
Rd., Silver Spring, MD 20910.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Stodart, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing a public conference entitled ``FDA CDER Small
Business and Industry Assistance Regulatory Education for Industry
Generic Drugs Forum.'' This public conference is intended to increase
the generic drug industry's awareness of applicable FDA regulations.

II. Topics for Discussion at the Public Conference

    This 2-day, FDA-led forum offers the opportunity to interact with
FDA subject matter experts from across CDER involved in the Generic
Drug Review Program. It will provide up-to-date information on program
progress and current initiatives and present a high-level regulatory
overview of the complete ANDA review pathway.

III. Participating in the Public Conference

    Registration: There is no fee to attend the public conference.
Space is limited, and registration will be on a first-come, first-
served basis. To register, please complete registration online at:
https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/SmallBusinessAssistance/ucm540969.htm?utm_source=FRN&utm_campaign=GDF2017. Early registration
is recommended. Registrants will receive email confirmation when they
have been accepted, and reminder emails will be sent to registrants 2
days before the conference. If time and space permit, onsite
registration will be available beginning at 7:30 a.m. on each day of
the public conference.
    If you need special accommodations due to disability, please
contact<EMAIL_ADDRESS>at least 7 days in advance.
    Streaming Webcast of the Public Conference: This public conference
will also be webcast. Persons interested in viewing the webcast must
register to receive a confirmation email with the webcast link.
    If you have never attended a Connect Pro event before, test your
connection at https://collaboration.fda.gov/common/help/en/support/meeting_test.htm. To get a quick overview of the Connect Pro program,
visit https://www.adobe.com/go/connectpro_overview. FDA has verified
the Web site addresses in this document, as of the date this document
publishes in the Federal Register, but Web sites are subject to change
over time.
    Transcripts: Transcripts will not be available.

    Dated: March 16, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-05602 Filed 3-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 63 (Friday, April 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18217]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7681]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2662-012; Project No. 12968-001]

FirstLight Hydro Generating Company, City of Norwich Department
of Public Utilities; Notice Updating Procedural Schedule for Licensing

    Take notice that the Hydropower Licensing Schedule for the Scotland
Hydroelectric Project No. 2662 and Scotland Hydroelectric Project No.
12968 has been updated. Subsequent revisions to the schedule may be
made as appropriate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Milestone                           Target date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Filing of Additional Information.....  May 8, 2011.
Issuance of the Better Adapted         May 16, 2011.
 Statement Request.
Notice of Acceptance/Notice of Ready   May 16, 2011.
 for Evironmental Analysis.
Filing of recommendations,             July 15, 2011.
 preliminary terms and conditions,
 and fishway prescriptions.
Filing of the Better Adapted           July 15, 2011.
 Statement.
Commission issues EA.................  November 12, 2011.
Comments on EA.......................  December 12, 2011.
Modified terms and conditions........  February 10, 2012.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: March 24, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-7681 Filed 3-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: January 13, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 8)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 1738-1741]
[DOCID:fr13ja10-20]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2009-1021]
RIN 1625-AA09

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; New Haven Harbor, Quinnipiac and
Mill Rivers, CT

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the regulation governing
the operation of three bridges across the Quinnipiac and Mill Rivers at
New Haven, Connecticut, to relieve the bridge owner from the burden of
crewing the bridges during time periods when the bridges seldom receive
requests to open while still providing for the reasonable needs of
navigation.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before February 12, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2009-1021 using any one of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department
of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these methods. See the
``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on submitting
comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee
V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2009-1021), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (http://www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online
via http://www.regulations.gov, it will be

considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit
the comment. If you fax, hand delivery, or mail your comment, it will
be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is
received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a phone
number in the body of your document so that we can contact you if we
have questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rules'' and insert ``USCG-2009-1021'' in the ``Keyword''
box. Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the
``Actions'' column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11
inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them
by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period
and may change the rule based on your comments.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2009-1021'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit either the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-
140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We
have an agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the
Docket Management Facility.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why one would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and
place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

Background and Purpose

    The Ferry Street Bridge at mile 0.7, across the Quinnipiac River
has a vertical clearance in the closed position of 25 feet at mean high
water and 31 feet at mean low water.
    The Grand Avenue Bridge at mile 1.3, across the Quinnipiac River
has a vertical clearance in the closed position of 9 feet at mean high
water and 15 feet at mean low water.
    The Chapel Street Bridge at mile 0.4, across the Mill River has a
vertical clearance of 7 feet at mean high water and 13 feet at mean low
water. The existing drawbridge operation regulations are listed at 33
CFR 117.213.
    The City of New Haven, the owner of the bridges, requested a change
to the drawbridge operation regulations for the Ferry Street Bridge
across Quinnipiac River at mile 0.7, the Grand Avenue Bridge across the
Quinnipiac River at mile 1.3, and the Chapel Street Bridge at mile 0.4,
across the Mill River, all at New Haven, Connecticut.
    During the past four years the Ferry Street Bridge has undergone a
major rehabilitation. During the rehabilitation project the movable
spans were removed or left in the open position at various times
allowing navigation to pass at all times.
    Now that the Ferry Street Bridge is fully operational again, the
bridge owner would like to change the drawbridge operation schedule for
all its bridges, the Ferry Street Bridge, the Grand Avenue Bridge and
the Chapel Street Bridge, to help reduce the burden of crewing these
bridges during time periods when there have been few requests to open
the bridges.
    The waterway users are seasonal recreational craft, commercial
fishing, and construction vessels.
    The existing drawbridge operation regulation listed at 33 CFR
117.213, authorizes a roving crew concept that requires the draw of the
Ferry Street Bridge to open on signal from October 1 through April 30,
between 9 p.m. and 5 a.m. unless the draw tender is at the Grand Ave or
Chapel Street bridges, in which case, a delay of up to one hour in
opening is permitted.
    The bridge owner would like to extend the above roving crew concept
to be in effect year round.
    As a result, the Coast Guard implemented a temporary test deviation
(74 FR 27249) on June 9, 2009, to test the proposed changes to the
drawbridge operation schedule in order to help us determine whether a
permanent change to the schedule would satisfactorily accomplish the
bridge owners goal and also continue to meet the reasonable needs of
navigation.
    The test period was in effect from May 1, 2009 through October 26,
2009. Satisfactory results were received from the test insofar as there
were no adverse impacts to navigation. In addition, we received no
objection to the operation schedule during or after the test period
ended. As a result of the successful test, we are proposing to
permanently change the drawbridge regulations for the three bridges.
    The operation regulation schedule for the Tomlinson Bridge, which
is owned by the Connecticut Department of Transportation, will not be
changed by this action and will continue to operate as listed in the
existing regulation.

Discussion of Proposed Rule

    Under this proposed rule the Ferry Street Bridge, the Grand Avenue
Bridge, and the Chapel Street Bridge would operate as follows:
    The Ferry Street Bridge across Quinnipiac River at mile 0.7, would
open on signal for all marine traffic; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to
8:30 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., weekdays except Federal holidays,
the draw need not be opened for the passage of vessel traffic. From 9
p.m. to 5 a.m., the draw would open on signal if at least a one hour
advance notice is given to the draw tender at the Chapel Street Bridge
by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    The Grand Avenue Bridge across Quinnipiac River at mile 1.3, would
open on signal for all marine traffic; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to
8:30 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., weekdays except Federal holidays,
the draw need not be opened for the passage of vessel traffic. From 9
p.m. to 5 a.m. the draw would open on signal if at least a one hour
advance notice is given to the draw tender at the Chapel Street Bridge
by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    The Chapel Street Bridge across the Mill River at mile 0.4, would
open on signal for all marine traffic; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to
8:30 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., weekdays except Federal holidays,
the draw need not be opened for the passage of vessel traffic. From 9
p.m. to 5 a.m. the draw would open on signal if at least a one hour

advance notice is given to the draw tender by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Under the existing regulation all the above bridges are allowed to
remain closed from noon to 12:15 and from 12:45 to 1 p.m. in addition
to the morning and afternoon rush hour time periods. The noon time
closure periods, noon to 12:15 and 12:25 to 1 p.m., will be removed
from all the above bridges, except the Tomlinson Bridge.
    The Coast Guard is also removing obsolete language from the
regulation as part of this action. Paragraphs (4)(b) through (4)(f)
shall be removed because they are now listed under Subpart A--General
Requirements, Sec.  117.31 and Sec.  117.15, and are redundant as a
result.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. This conclusion is based
upon the fact that we tested the above drawbridge operation schedule
and found that it met the reasonable needs of navigation.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the
following reasons. A test period was in effect from May 1, 2009 through
October 26, 2009. Satisfactory results were received from the test
insofar as there were no adverse impacts to navigation. In addition, we
received no objection to the operation schedule during or after the
test period ended and found that the operation schedule met the
reasonable needs of navigation.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Commander (dpb), First Coast
Guard District, Bridge Branch, One South Street, New York, NY 10004.
The telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have Tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these

standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards
(e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation;
test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems
practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01, and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment because it simply
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. We
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

    1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

    2. Revise Sec.  117.213 to read as follows:

Sec.  117.213  New Haven Harbor, Quinnipiac and Mill Rivers.

    The draws of the Tomlinson Bridge, mile 0.0, the Ferry Street
Bridge, mile 0.7, and the Grand Avenue Bridge, mile 1.3, across the
Quinnipiac River, and the Chapel Street Bridge, mile 0.4, across the
Mill River, shall operate as follows:
    (a) The draw of the Tomlinson Bridge at mile 0.0, across the
Quinnipiac River shall open on signal; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to
8:30 a.m., noon to 12:15 p.m., 12:45 p.m. to 1 p.m., and 4:45 p.m. to
5:45 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, the draw
need not open for the passage of vessel traffic.
    (b) The draw of the Ferry Street Bridge at mile 0.7, across
Quinnipiac River, shall open on signal; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to
8:30 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays, the draws need not open for the passage of vessel
traffic. From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. the draw shall open on signal if at
least a one-hour advance notice is given by calling the number posted
at the bridge.
    (c) The draw of the Grand Avenue Bridge at mile 1.3, across the
Quinnipiac River shall open on signal; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to
8:30 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays, the draw need not open for the passage of vessel
traffic. From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. the draw shall open on signal if at
least a one-hour advance notice is given by calling the number posted
at the bridge.
    (d) The draw of the Chapel Street Bridge at mile 0.4, across the
Mill River shall open on signal; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30
a.m. and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays, the draw need not open for the passage of vessel traffic.
From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. the draw shall open on signal after at least a
one-hour advance notice is given by calling the number posted at the
bridge.

    Dated: December 28, 2009.
Joseph L. Nimmich,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2010-435 Filed 1-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


Agenda Oklahoma Early Action Compacts Technical Advisory Committee and Public Meeting 10 A. M. Thursday, January 22, 2004 Department of Environmental Quality 707 North Robinson   1st Floor Meeting Room Ok lahoma City, Oklahoma 1. Welcome DEQ 2. 1999 Modeling Sensitivity Results * ENVIRON 2002 and 2007 RRF Results 2007 Ozone Source Apportionment Results 2007 Controls and Sensitivity Results Boundary Condition Sensitivity Results 3. Federal Perspective EPA Region 6 4. Comments from Committee Technical Committee 5. Comments from Public Public 6. Next Steps/ Recommendations Committee Adjourn * Background materials found at www. deq. state. ok. us/ AQDNew/ EACreport. htm


[Federal Register: July 28, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 145)]
[Notices]
[Page 43812]
[DOCID:fr28jy08-122]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-58201; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2008-043]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Order
Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment
No. 1 Thereto, To Amend the Definition of ``Non-Industry Director'' in
the By-Laws of The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. and The NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC

July 21, 2008.
    On May 12, 2008, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, a
proposed rule change to amend the definition of ``Non-Industry
Director'' in The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc.'s by-laws (``NASDAQ OMX By-
Laws'') and Nasdaq's by-laws (``Nasdaq By-Laws''). On May 28, 2008,
Nasdaq filed Amendment No. 1. The proposed rule change was published
for comment in the Federal Register on June 9, 2008.\2\ The Commission
received no comments regarding the proposal. This order approves the
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57911 (June 3,
2008), 73 FR 32615.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nasdaq proposes to amend NASDAQ OMX By-Laws and Nasdaq By-Laws to
clarify that a director of an issuer of securities may be considered an
``issuer representative'' for purposes of provisions in these by-laws
that require issuer representation on NASDAQ OMX's board of directors
(``NASDAQ OMX Board'') and Nasdaq's board of directors (``Nasdaq
Board''), respectively.
    Section 4.3 of the NASDAQ OMX By-Laws currently provides that the
number of Non-Industry Directors,\3\ including at least one issuer
representative, must equal or exceed the number of Industry
Directors,\4\ unless the NASDAQ OMX Board consists of ten or more
directors, in which case at least two directors must be issuer
representatives. Likewise, Article III, Section 2(a) of the Nasdaq By-
Laws provides that the number of Non-Industry Directors,\5\ including
at least one issuer representative, must equal or exceed the number of
Industry Directors\6\ and Member Representative Directors,\7\ unless
the Nasdaq Board consists of ten or more directors, in which case at
least two directors shall be issuer representatives.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Article I(m), NASDAQ OMX By-Laws.
    \4\ See Article I(j), NASDAQ OMX By-Laws.
    \5\ See Article I(v), Nasdaq By-Laws.
    \6\ See Article I(l), Nasdaq By-Laws.
    \7\ See Article I(q), Nasdaq By-Laws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The term ``issuer representative,'' however, is not defined in
either the NASDAQ OMX By-Laws or the Nasdaq By-Laws. Instead, NASDAQ
OMX By-Laws provide that ``Non-Industry Director'' means a director who
is a Public Director,\8\ an officer or employee of an issuer of
securities listed on a national securities exchange operated by any
Self-Regulatory Subsidiary,\9\ or any other individual who would not be
an Industry Director or Industry committee member. Similarly, Nasdaq
By-Laws provide that ``Non-Industry Director'' means a director who is
a Public Director,\10\ an officer or employee of an issuer of
securities listed on the national securities exchange operated by
Nasdaq, or any other individual who would not be an Industry Director.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Article I(n), NASDAQ OMX By-Laws.
    \9\ See Article I(o), NASDAQ OMX By-Laws.
    \10\ See Article I(y), Nasdaq By-Laws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because these definitions of Non-Industry Director could be
construed to require that an issuer representative must be an officer
or employee of an issuer but not a director, Nasdaq proposes to clarify
the NASDAQ OMX By-Laws' and Nasdaq By-Laws' definitions of Non-Industry
Director to include a reference to ``director'' so that these
definitions could not preclude a director of an issuer from serving as
an issuer representative.
    The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.\11\ In
particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(3) of the Act,\12\ which requires that the
rules of the exchange assure a fair representation of its members in
the selection of its directors and administration of its affairs and
provide that one or more directors shall be representative of issuers
and investors and not be associated with a member of the exchange,
broker, or dealer. The Commission believes that the proposed rule
change is appropriate, because it would clarify that the director of a
Nasdaq issuer could serve as an issuer representative on the NASDAQ OMX
Board and Nasdaq Board.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\13\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NASDAQ-2008-043), as
modified by Amendment No. 1, be, and it hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-17210 Filed 7-25-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1962-1963]
[FR Doc No: 2016-00550]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4245-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2015-0002]

Texas; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Texas (FEMA-4245-DR), dated November 25, 2015, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: December 9, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Texas is hereby amended to include the following area
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the
event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of
November 25, 2015.

    Cameron County for Individual Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially

Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2016-00550 Filed 1-13-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P