                      EPA HCl Performance Specification
                         Draft Conference Call Summary
                     Thursday July, 21 from 1:30-2:30 EDT.
        Call in Conference Number 1-866-299-3188, code is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
                         Stakeholder Discussion Topic:
      What are the best approaches for in the field QC/recovery checks.

1) Welcome  -  Introduction
   a) EPA plans to have stakeholder calls on various topics at a frequency of once every two weeks
   b) We will work from the list of issues previously sent to the stakeholder.  The specific topic from the list will be announced by email prior to the meeting to allow everyone to prepare.  We will try to limit discussion to the announce topic so stakeholders can choose which conference calls to attend.  We plan to cover all of the topics in our original summary and may add topics that arise from our ongoing discussions with stakeholders.
   c) EPA will start working on a draft of the performance standard in August based in part on the information from the stakeholder calls.  Over the next six weeks stakeholders (Table 1) participating in this call will start seeing draft sections of the Performance specification and is associated procedure.  Comments on the drafts are welcome so we can get your input well before we have a complete draft.
   d) Our timing remains to have the first full draft for Stakeholder review by the end of the calendar year (2011).

2) Field QC Topics Discussion - In field hot wet through the probe spiking

When area source tests were performed for cement plants, Jim Peeler - Emissions Monitoring Inc. used Method 321Measurement of Gaseous Hydrogen Chloride Emissions At Portland Cement Kilns by Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy.  This method requires through the probe spikes, including specifications for the maximum amount of spike introduced through the probe, and the relative concentration of spike that can be used. This QC approach provides an evaluation of the measurement system since it demonstrates that you can successfully transport a known concentration of gaseous HCl through the probe and filter cake into the heated instrument cell.  For cement kiln HCl measurement, the filtered particulate matter is comprised solids that react with HCl.  Through the probe spiking provides an assessment of both the sampling/analysis system and it tests the mathematical algorithms used in some equipment to correct for interferences in the sample matrix.

   a) The spike is limited to a maximum of 10% of the sample gas stream.  The concentration target for through the probe spiking is the approximate concentration of the gas stream or 5 ppm is the gas tested is less than 5 ppmv.  For example, spiking a gas stream of 5 ppm involves using a certified gas at 50 ppmv HCl which is diluted 10/1 resulting in the addition of a spike of 5 ppm in addition to the stack gas HCl. The measured concentration of native plus spike is approximately double the concentration of the native HCl. In this approach the spike gas dilutes the native concentration by approximately 10%.
   b) The sample gas flow rate and the spike gas flow rate must be measured very accurately or the tester can inject a known concentration of tracer such as SF6 to determine the exact dilution.
   c) The calibration gas standard is also delivered directly to the measurement device to determine response of the standard gas without sampling system or sample matrix bias.  This QC check is the relative concentration or relative indicator used to determine spike recovery.  Direct instrument measurement of the spike gas provides the exact response of the spike gas regardless of the absolute concentration of the certified gas cylinder.
   d) Spike recovery can be determined in different ways as described in the ASTM FTIR measurement procedure for Stationary Sources.  Recovery based requirements permit the measurement procedure to be performance based rather than the more restrictive performance requirements of a prescriptive procedure.
      i) Spike recovery can be based on the total expected response for the native plus the spike or
      ii) Spike recovery can be based on the incremental response resulting from the spike addition to the native concentration.
   e) For sources with highly variable HCl emissions there is a question of whether two analysis units are required so the instantaneous native HCl can be separated from the through the probe spike response. In both the ASTM procedure and Method 321, there are cautions about spiking when the process is not stable.  One alternative useful for highly variable sources is calculating the average of native concentration just prior and just after the spike interval.  Furthermore, if a the QC spike check fails and the tester believes the cause is temporal variation of the source, the spike can be repeated when the source is relatively constant.  Since the measurements are continuous, a simple statistical test on process variability may be useful to identify when the measurements are out of control or the failure is due to process variability.
   f) EPA has a guideline document for monitoring non-criteria pollutants that addresses these issues.
   g) Allen Rilling - ABB: The spiking system through the probe identifies sampling system bias.  What is the issue spiking at the analyzer once the initial performance of the system is verified.  Jim Peeler: Through the probe spiking is valid for a period of time until the accumulation of material on the filter from the process biases the results.  For cement kilns the filter collects calcium oxides and other material that reacts with HCl.  Sulfur Oxides compete for adsorption sites on the filtered material so through the probe spiking needs to be done periodically to confirm the measurement system meets bias requirements.  During measurement programs for HCl, testers are required to verify the instrument performance before and after each test run. The measurements requirement seems excessive for a continuous monitoring system but is standard for periodic measurement programs.  However, periodic through the probe is necessary to determine when sufficient material was accumulated on the filter to significantly bias the monitoring results.
   h) Robin Segall - EPA: suggests that if daily calibration checks are required as system calibration versus an analyzer calibration.  A daily calibration check through the filter will provide information on the bias caused by the filtered solids as opposed to an instrument only calibration check that provides information on instrument drift and span.  System calibration through the filter should be done daily but there's not enough information on cement kiln continuous monitoring to evaluate how often the analyte spike should be performed. Lime plants, downstream of limestone scrubbers and cement kilns are probably the worst case examples for needing through the probe analyte spikes.
   i) Jim Peeler: If daily system calibration checks are required then the job of the analyte spike technique performs is the same as the function of a RATA.  That is to detect excessive sampling system bias and measurement interferences.  Currently he does accuracy assessment on a quarterly basis.  He suggests doing initial certification including a series of through the probe spikes during a seven day certification period and then quarterly thereafter.
   j) Robin Segall:  Question, are you proposing to substitute analyte spiking for a RATA against a reference method?  Jim Peeler: Yes, thus avoiding the issue of using reference Method 321 for HCl based on FTIR to evaluate an FTIR CEM. If a facility failed the quarterly through the probe analyte spike then there could be a requirement to do the spiking more frequently.
   k) Jim Peeler:  Agreed that calibration checks include the entire system for regulatory programs and the requirement in this PS should be consistent with that practice. If a system calibration check fails, testers would immediately run an analyzer calibration check to eliminate drift or response changes as the cause of the system calibration check failure.
   l) Allen Rilling : shared his concern about the amount of gas required to perform system calibration checks through the probe.  If quarterly checks verified no system bias, he asked if direct instrument calibration checks would be adequate.
   m) Laura Kenner: For cement kilns, quarterly through the probe QC checks seem too infrequent.  Allen Rilling: Once you've built up a history of passed QC checks, then less frequent through the probe QC checks seem to make sense and would reduce costs for calibration gas as well as increase uptime for source monitoring.
   n) There was some discussion of needing to do a direct instrument and a system calibration check sequentially to ensure that changes in the calibration gas concentration did not bias the QC check.  This assumes that the calibration is not stable and that issue will be discussed on a separate call.
   o) Robin Segall:  Using HCl CEMS in a compliance mode will require performing system calibration checks on a relatively consistent basis.  The starting point would probably be a daily calibration check since EPA established this frequency for our other compliance programs.
   p) Allen Rilling:  Once you have an analyzer that demonstrates unbiased measurement for a year then you have support for performing less frequent calibration checks.  He asked if it was possible to base the frequency of system calibration checks on a past experience history for a specific monitor installation.
   q) Robin Segall:  If we wrote such a Performance Specification, the data from an interval between a failure and the previous passed system calibration check would be invalid data.
   r)  Jim Peeler:  Appendix F invalidates data from the time a QC check or audit is failed forward and does not retroactively invalidate data because a source operator might be encourage to fail a test to invalidate data the facility did not "like".  For systems like FTIR that measure multi-components, if the system is measuring one component correctly the instrument is probably measuring the other components that get to the analyzer correctly.  That would mean a calibration check for one component would assure that the instrument was operating correctly for all components.  The most reactive component being measured might serve as a surrogate for the rest of the multi-component measurements and that component will probably be HCl.
3) Alternatives to hot  -  wet  -  through the probe QC checks
   a) Rich Brown  -  Altech: Is the performance specification we are discussing an update of the FTIR procedure or is it a general HCl monitoring performance specification?  Candace Sorrell - EPA: The performance specification will be generally applicable to all technologies measuring HCl including all current HCl stack monitors and future technologies that serve this purpose.  Altech uses Perma-Pure nafion dryer technology at the probe location followed by dry delivery to a multigas NDIR filter based monitor.  This system is not hot wet since the sample is dried at the sampling probe/sampling location.  Altech does not use an all heated system after the dryer.  The system is an extractive system that brings dry cool sample to the analyzer.  The stack gas hot (180 C and filtered prior to the dryer.  There is no issue with spiking in the hot wet zone in front of the filter.  That means this sampling design would not be excluded from using a hot wet HCl performance spike.  Jim Peeler: We've successfully performed hot, wet field spikes with HCl using the Altech system.
   b) Laura Kenner - Emission Monitoring Inc.:  It seems that hot wet spiking should work for extractive systems.  In-situ monitoring systems may require a different approach.
   c) Keith Crab - Cemtech Environmental: Cemtech offers an in-situ tunable diode laser cross stack monitoring system. Cemtech uses a flow through cell in the optical measurement path that can be spiked with calibration gas to check instrument performance.  The cell functions in a similar manner to the hot wet spike since it is an additive spike to the measurement path.  The cell can be mounted on the stack or at the instrument. The flow through cell seems to be a valid test of the instrument performance that can be practically tested.  Higher concentration gases appropriate to the path length would be required for flow through cell spiking. This technology lends itself to multipoint QC or calibration checks.  At the end of a QC cycle the cell is flushed with nitrogen until the baseline before spiking is reached.  The cell remains in place during measurements and calibration checks.  There is no practical way of doing a cross stack zero measurement insitu.  Zero and span checks will be discussed in a separate stakeholder call.  The temperature and pressure of the gas cell and the stack gas must be included in the calculation of gas concentration.  Cemtech's flow through cell is not heated and equilibrates to the temperature at its location.  Lorentzian line shape is used in the calculation of concentration.
   d) Cemtech is also investigating an extractive dynamic probe TDL system that could be spiked with HCl through the probe similar to other extractive systems.
4) Concentration of spikes
   a) Jim Peeler: With emission standards approaching 3 ppm for cement kilns there are issues because plants that include inline raw mills will cycle between mill off high concentrations and mill on low concentrations.  What's the best concentration to spike and is it reasonable to assume that if spikes at low concentrations are recovered successfully then higher spike concentrations will also be recovered successfully?  Periodic testing supports this conclusion.
   b) Low concentration spikes are more a concern during calibration checks when 100 % gas (flooding the system with calibration gas) is being tested.  Dynamic, hot wet spiking is not performed at no more than 10% of the volume of gas sampled which means the spike gas can be a higher concentration.  The spike gas should not be the same gas as the calibration check standard gas.  This hot wet dynamic spike is similar to quarterly cylinder gas audits used in other programs.
   c) Luc Sevrette  -  Gasmet: Are we talking about a representative daily check, and if so a calibration check going through the system dry would take more than an hour to equilibrate.  He recommends a daily hot wet spike through the probe but not a daily calibration check with low level standards that must equilibrate through the system dry.
   d) Allen Rilling:  We typically spike at 75% of the measure emission level.  The new compliance limits present additional bias opportunities since the concentration is so low that the delivery systems may affect how accurately the HCl can be delivered to the probe.  Options to consider are daily zero and span or daily through the probe spike.
   e) Also to be considered is the possibility of using a tracer gas to verify the dilution ratio of the spike gas delivery system in place of relying on mass flow controllers or rotameters for flow measurements.  This may be an option for multi-component monitors but may be a issue for narrow wavelength or single component systems that only measure HCl.  If the definition of tracer gas is left flexible, then manufacturers will have to solve this issue on an instrument specific basis.
      Table 1: Conference Call Attendees and Contact Information
Stakeholder Name
Affiliation
Interest
Email
Present
Rachael Agnew
EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MPG
EPA
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Joe Aldina
Covanta Energy
Facility
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Collin Boswell
EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MPG
EPA
boswell.collin @epa.gov

Rich Brown
Altech
Equip Vendor

Y
Gary Catchatory
Tyco Environmental Systems
Equip Vendor

Kieth Crab
Cemtech Environmental
Equip Vendor

Y
Edul Chikhliwala
EcoChem Analytics
Equip Vendor
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Michael Corvese
Thermofisher
Equip Vendor
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Bob Davis
AirGas
Gas Vendor
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Jason Dewees
EPA/OAQPS/AQAD/MTG
EPA
dewees.jason@ epa.gov

Frank Duckett
Thermofisher
Equip Vendor
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Andy Edwards
Ash Grove Cement
Facility

Gerri Garwood
EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MPG
EPA
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Fred Grunewald
MKS Instruments Inc.
Equip Vendor
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Desirea Haggard
Cal Portland
Facility
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Y
Jeff Harrington
Tyco Environmental Systems
Equip Vendor

Malik Hatar
Altech
Equip Vendor

Mike Hayes
Linde Gas
Gas Vendor

Andre Hegre
Gas Technologies, Finland
Equip Vendor

Stephen Johnson
Thermofishter Inc.
Equip Vendor
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Dan Kietzer
Sick-Maihak
Equip Vendor
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Laura Kenner
Emission Monitoring Inc.
Tester
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Y
Dieter Kita
Thermofisher
Equip Vendor
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Bill McMaster
PermaPure
Equip Add-on

Y
Barbara Marshick
MKS Instruments
Equip Vendor
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Ray Merrill
EPA/OAQPS/AQAD/MTG
EPA
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Y
Barrett Parker
EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MPG
EPA
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Ashmud Patel
Ethyl Smith Automation

Jim Peeler
Emission Monitoring Inc.
Tester
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Y
Allan Rilling
ABB
Equip Vendor
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Y
Ralph Roberson
RMB Consulting
Tester
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Matthew Rutledge
Lafarge
Facility

Robin Segall
EPA/OAQPS/AQAD/MTG
EPA
segall.robin@@epa.gov

Luc Sevrette
Gasmet
Equip Vendor
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Ty Smith
Cemtech Environmental
Equip Vendor

Candace Sorrell
EPA/OAQPS/AQAD/MTG
Regulatory Agency
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Y
Martin Spartz
Prism Analytical technology
Tester
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Bob Vantuyl
Ash Grove Cement
Facility
bob.vantuyl@ashgrove

Henry Veger
CEM Specialties
Equip Vendor

Dave  Vigowax
Marantee Tile
Facility

Bethany White
RMB Consulting
Tester

Y
James Willis
Titan America
Facility
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Hector Ybanez,
Holcim Inc.
Facility
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Musa  Zada
Altech
Equip Vendor

Peter Zemek
MKS Instruments
Equip vendor
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Y
         Y= Higlighted attendance indicates first time participants.


[Federal Register: October 10, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 198)]
[Notices]
[Page 60378-60380]
[DOCID:fr10oc08-146]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-58741; File No. SR-NYSE-2008-97]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule
Change by New York Stock Exchange LLC To Adopt an Initial Listing
Standard Applicable Only to Companies Transferring From NYSE Arca

 October 6, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act''),\2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on October 1, 2008, New York Stock Exchange LLC (the
``NYSE'' or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission the proposed rule changes as described in Items I, II and
III below, which items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule changes from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Section 102.01C of the Exchange's
Listed Company Manual (the ``Manual'') to adopt an initial listing
standard that will be applicable only to companies that are listed on
NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'') as of October 1, 2008 and that transfer
to the Exchange on or before March 31, 2009. The Exchange also proposes
to apply the continued listing standard applicable under Section
802.01B to companies listed under the Earnings Test to companies listed
under the proposed new initial listing standard.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Commission notes that NYSE is also proposing to adopt a
new initial listing standard for operating companies. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 58740 (October 6, 2008) (SR-NYSE-2008-98).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available at http://
www.nyse.com, the NYSE, and the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The NYSE has prepared summaries,
set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Section 102.01C of the Manual to
adopt an initial listing standard that will be applicable only to
companies that are listed on NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'') as of
October 1, 2008 and that transfer to the Exchange on or before March
31, 2009. The Exchange also proposes to apply the continued listing
standard applicable under Section 802.01B to companies listed under the
Earnings Test \5\ to companies listed under the proposed new initial
listing standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ As set forth in Section 802.01B(1) of the Manual.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Upon completion of its acquisition of the American Stock Exchange
(to be renamed NYSE Alternext US LLC at the time of the acquisition),
NYSE Euronext will have three equity listing markets: The NYSE; NYSE
Arca; and NYSE Alternext US. NYSE Euronext management has made a
strategic business decision to move forward with only two operating
company equity listing markets and, consequently, has decided to
discontinue the operating company equity listing program on NYSE Arca.
As part of this transition, the Exchange wishes to offer the
opportunity to list on the NYSE to all suitable NYSE Arca companies.
NYSE Arca listed companies wishing to transfer to the NYSE will be
required to submit a listing application and be subject to the same
listing application process as all other applicant companies. Most
companies currently listed on NYSE Arca would meet the NYSE's continued
listing requirements set forth in Section 802.01B of the Manual for
companies listed under the Exchange's Earnings Test.\6\ However, a
number of these companies that meet the NYSE's continued listing
standards do not qualify to list under any of the existing NYSE initial
listing standards. In order to list these companies, the Exchange
proposes to adopt a special listing standard applicable only to those
companies listed on NYSE Arca on the date of initial submission of this
filing and the Exchange would only utilize this standard for a brief
period, ending on March 31, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Companies listed under the Earnings Test are considered to
be below compliance standards if their average global market
capitalization over a consecutive 30 trading-day period is less than
$75,000,000 and, at the same time, total stockholders' equity is
less than $75,000,000. In addition Section 802.01B requires all
listed companies to maintain a minimum of $25 million in global
market capitalization and Section 802.01C requires all listed
companies to maintain a $1.00 minimum stock price. The Exchange
represents that the holders, trading volume and publicly-held shares
requirements of Section 802.01A along with the requirements of
Sections 802.01D (``Other Criteria'') and 802.01E (``SEC Annual
Report Timely Filing Criteria'') would also apply. Telephone
conversation between John Carey, Chief Counsel, NYSE and David J.
Michehl, Special Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets,
Commission on October 6, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Companies transferring from NYSE Arca under the proposed standard
(the ``NYSE Arca Transfer Standard'') would be required to have $75
million in total market capitalization for 90 consecutive days prior to
applying for listing and $20 million in market value of publicly-held
shares (but not the $100 million market value of publicly-held shares
requirement of Section 102.01B). Such companies would have to meet the
holders, publicly-held shares and trading volume requirements as set
forth in Section 102.01A as companies that list under the existing
initial listing standards and the $4 stock price requirement of Section
102.01B.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The total market capitalization and market value of
publicly-held shares requirements of the NYSE Arca Transfer Standard
equal those of Amex Initial Listing Standard 4 (Amex Company Guide
Section 101(d)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes it is appropriate to adopt a short-term
listing standard applicable only to NYSE Arca companies. These
companies listed on NYSE Arca on the assumption that it would exist as
a permanent listing market and it is solely because of a business
decision made by NYSE Euronext that these companies will need to
transfer their listings. Many of these companies listed on NYSE Arca
because of its association with the NYSE and in the expectation that
they would ultimately switch their listing to the NYSE when they met
the NYSE's listing standards. As such, the Exchange believes that
fairness dictates that it should seek to list these companies on the
NYSE where such a listing is appropriate and in the interests of the
investing public.
    The NYSE will only list companies under the NYSE Arca Transfer
Standard if it believes that those companies are suitable for trading
on the NYSE. All of the companies that would be listed under the NYSE
Arca Transfer Standard will far exceed the NYSE's continued listing
standards at the time of initial listing and will be in compliance with
NYSE Arca continued listing standards. In addition, the same staff in
NYSE Regulation's Financial Compliance and Corporate Governance groups
is responsible for ongoing compliance reviews of both NYSE and NYSE
Arca companies. As such, the NYSE Regulation staff involved in making
initial listing determinations on the NYSE is extremely familiar with
the companies currently listed on NYSE Arca and is uniquely positioned
to determine whether those companies are suitable for listing on the
NYSE. The Exchange believes its depth of knowledge with respect to NYSE
Arca companies makes it appropriate to list them on this one time basis
under a less onerous standard than the Exchange applies to other
listing applicants. Companies listing under the NYSE Arca Transfer
Standard will be subject to the standard listing application and review
process applicable to all listing applicants and, if Exchange staff
determine that an NYSE Arca company is not suitable for listing on the
NYSE--notwithstanding its qualification under the numerical
requirements of the NYSE Arca Transfer Standard--the Exchange will not
list that company.
    The requirements of the NYSE Arca Transfer Standard will exceed
those established by the Exchange Act Rule 3a51-1(a)(2) (the ``Penny
Stock Rule'').\8\ The proposed standard's requirement that an applicant
have $75 million in global market capitalization for 90 days prior to
transferring from NYSE Arca exceeds the $50 million market
capitalization for 90 days prior to listing option in the Penny Stock
Rule, as well as the $50 million market capitalization requirement of
Rule 3a51-1(a)(2)(i)(B). In addition, companies listing under the NYSE
Arca Transfer Standard will be required at the time of transfer to have
a $4 stock price, 400 round lot holders and 1.1 million publicly held
shares, thereby meeting or exceeding all of the

Penny Stock Rule's remaining requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 240.a51-1(a)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Companies listing under the NYSE Arca Transfer Standard will have
to comply with all other applicable Exchange listing rules, including
the Exchange's corporate governance requirements. As with all other
listing applicants, the Exchange reserves the right to deny listing to
any company seeking to list under the NYSE Arca Transfer Standard if
the Exchange determines that the listing of any such company is not in
the interests of the Exchange or the public interest.
2. Statutory Basis
    The basis under the Act for this proposed rule change is the
requirement under Section 6(b)(5) \9\ that an exchange have rules that
are designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The
Exchange believes that the proposed amendment is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest in that the
requirements of the NYSE Arca Transfer Standard are sufficiently
stringent that the proposed amendment will not lead to the listing of
any companies that are not suited for listing on the NYSE. In addition,
the proposal applies for a very brief period to a small number of
companies that are subject to unique and disadvantageous circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purpose of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve the proposed rule change, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Exchange Act. Comments may be submitted
by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2008-97 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2008-97. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2008-97 and should be
submitted on or before October 31, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-24178 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 17225]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07021]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, the Securities and
Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, March 30,
2016 at 10:00 a.m. in the Auditorium, Room L-002.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:
    1. The Commission will consider whether to issue a concept release
seeking comment on modernizing certain business and financial
disclosure requirements in Regulation S-K.
    2. The Commission will consider whether to adopt rules under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regarding the business conduct
standards for security-based swap dealers and major security-based swap
participants.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted, or postponed, please contact: the Office of the
Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 23, 2016.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-07021 Filed 3-24-16; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 13, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21747-21752]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08158]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2015-0497; FRL-9944-71-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Control
of Air Pollution From Nitrogen Compounds State Implementation Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving
revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State
of Texas through the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)
on July 10, 2015. The Texas SIP submission revises 30 Texas
Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 117 rules for control of nitrogen
compounds to assist the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) moderate nonattainment
area (NAA) in attaining the 2008 eight-hour ozone (O3)
National

Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

DATES: This rule is effective on May 13, 2016.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-2015-0497. All documents in the docket are
listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas,
Texas 75202-2733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James E. Grady,<PHONE_NUMBER>;
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``our,''
or ``us'' each mean ``the EPA.''

I. Background

    The background for this action is discussed in detail in the
December 21, 2015 proposal (80 FR 79279). In that document, the EPA
proposed to approve the submitted 30 TAC Chapter 117 SIP revision
(submitted on July 10, 2015) as assisting the DFW area into attainment
of the 2008 8-Hour O3 NAAQS.
    The Proposal and the technical support documents (TSDs) that
accompanied the proposed rule provide detailed descriptions of the
revisions and the rationale for the proposed decisions. Please see the
docket for these and other documents regarding the Proposal. The public
comment period for the Proposal closed on January 20, 2016.
    The EPA received one comment email dated December 30, 2015, from
TCEQ. The EPA's response to the comment is below.

II. Response to Comments

    Comment: There is an error on page 79282 of the Federal Register
publication in Table 6. The horsepower (hp) rating for turbines under
the Capacity column should be ``hp rating <10,000 hp'' and ``hp rating
>=10,000 hp'' instead of ``hp rating <=10,000 hp'' and ``hp rating
>=10,000 hp'' as is currently printed.
    Response: The EPA agrees with the mathematical operator change and
notes that the adopted rule submitted to the EPA on July 10, 2015 under
Sec.  117.405(b) should read as follows:
    (3) Stationary gas turbines:
    (A) with a horsepower (hp) rating of less than 10,000 hp, 0.55 lb/
MMBtu;

and

    (B) with a hp rating of 10,000 hp or greater, 0.15 lb/MMBtu.
    Please refer to Table 1 below for a list of NOX
emissions specifications for major sources in newly designated Wise
County including a change in response to the above comment.

            Table 1--NOX Emission Limits for 2008 DFW 8-Hour O3 NAA for Major Sources in Wise County
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Source                   Type                 Capacity                 NOX limit          Citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Process Heaters:............                   Max Rated Capacity >=40       0.10 lb/MMBtu;....  117.405(b)(1).
                                                MMBtu/hr.
                                               An option...................  or 82 ppmv NOX at   117.405(b)(1).
                                                                              3% O2 dry basis.
Stationary, Reciprocating     Gas-Fired Rich-  ............................  0.50 g/hp-hr......  117.405(b)(2)(A
 Internal Combustion Engines.  Burn.                                                              ).
                              Gas-Fired Lean-  White Superior four-cycle     12.0 g/hp-hr......  117.405(b)(2)(B
                               Burn.            units that have been placed                       )(i)(I).
                                                into service, modified,
                                                reconstructed, or relocated
                                                before June 1, 2015.
                                               White Superior four-cycle     2.0 g/hp-hr.......  117.405(b)(2)(B
                                                units that have been placed                       )(i)(II).
                                                into service, modified,
                                                reconstructed, or relocated
                                                on or after June 1, 2015.
                                               Clark two-cycle units that    12.0 g/hp-hr......  117.405(b)(2)(B
                                                have been placed into                             )(ii)(I).
                                                service, modified,
                                                reconstructed, or relocated
                                                before June 1, 2015.
                                               Clark two-cycle units that    2.0 g/hp-hr.......  117.405(b)(2)(B
                                                have been placed into                             )(ii)(II).
                                                service, modified,
                                                reconstructed, or relocated
                                                on or after June 1, 2015.
                                               Fairbanks Morse MEP two-      4.0 g/hp-hr.......  117.405(b)(2)(B
                                                cycle units that have been                        )(iii)(I).
                                                placed into service,
                                                modified, reconstructed, or
                                                relocated before June 1,
                                                2015.
                                               Fairbanks Morse MEP two-      2.0 g/hp-hr.......  117.405(b)(2)(B
                                                cycle units that have been                        )(iii)(II).
                                                placed into service,
                                                modified, reconstructed, or
                                                relocated on or after June
                                                1, 2015.
                                               All others..................  2.0 g/hp-hr.......  117.405(b)(2)(B
                                                                                )(iv).
Turbines:...................  Stationary Gas.  hp rating <10,000 hp........  0.55 lb/MMBtu.....  117.405(b)(3)(A
                                                                                ).
                                               hp rating >= 10,000 hp......  0.15 lb/MMBtu.....  117.405(b)(3)(B
                                                                                ).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Final Action

    With one exception the EPA is approving all modified, repealed and
new sections of 30 TAC Chapter 117 submitted by Texas on July 10, 2015
as part of the SIP revision.\1\ The EPA is not taking action on the
revision to 30 TAC 117.9810. The EPA intends to act on this revision in
a later action. Table 2

contains a list of the sections of Chapter 117 with adopted
subchapters, divisions, and key sections with approved modifications
associated with the July 10, 2015 DFW 2008 eight-hour O3 SIP
submittal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The EPA did not make a determination that the TCEQ rules
included in the revision would meet the RACT requirements of the CAA
Sec.  182(b) for the 2008 O3 NAAQS. Instead, the EPA
intended for the rule changes to enhance the SIP by achieving
NOX reductions in the DFW NAA. The EPA will make a RACT
determination in a separate action.

  Table 2--Description and Sections of 30 TAC, Chapter 117 Approved for
                              Modification
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Description                            Section
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subchapter A: Definitions..............  Sec.   117.10.
Subchapter B, Division 4, DFW Eight-     Sec.  Sec.   117.400, 117.403,
 Hour O3 NAA Major Sources.               117.410, 117.423, 117.425,
                                          117.430, 117.435, 117.440,
                                          117.445, 117.450, 117.454, and
                                          117.456.
Subchapter C, Division 4, DFW Eight-     Sec.  Sec.   117.1303,
 Hour O3 NAA Utility Electric             117.1310, 117.1325, 117.1335,
 Generation Sources.                      117.1340, 117.1345, 117.1350,
                                          and 117.1354.
Subchapter G, Division 1, General        Sec.   117.8000.
 Monitoring and Testing Requirements.
Subchapter H, Division 1, Compliance     Sec.   117.9030 and Sec.
 Schedules and Division 2, Compliance     117.9130, Sec.   117.9800.
 Flexibility.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Table 3 contains a list of the sections of Chapter 117 with adopted
subchapters, divisions, and key sections with approved new requirements
associated with the July 10, 2015 DFW 2008 eight-hour O3 SIP
submittal.

  Table 3--Description and Sections of 30 TAC, Chapter 117 Approved New
                              Requirements
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Description                            Section
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subchapter B, Division 4, DFW Eight-     Sec.  Sec.   117.405, 117.452.
 Hour O3 NAA Major Sources.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Per TCEQ's request, the following sections listed in Table 4 below
will not become a part of the EPA-approved Texas SIP. These rules
pertain mainly to the control of carbon monoxide and ammonia emissions,
which are not O3 precursors and, therefore, not necessary
components of the DFW SIP. The EPA concurs that these rules can remain
outside of the SIP.

  Table 4--Description and Sections of 30 TAC, Chapter 117 Not in Texas
                                   SIP
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Description                            Sections
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Previously excluded and the TCEQ         Sec.  Sec.   117.210(c),
 continues to ask that these remain       117.225, 117.410(d), 117.425,
 outside the SIP.                         117.1110(b), 117.1125,
                                          117.1310(b), and 117.1325.
Adopted new and will not be submitted    Sec.   117.405(d).
 as a SIP revision.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Table 5 contains subchapters, divisions, and key sections approved
for repeal from the SIP by the TCEQ. The TCEQ adopts the repeal of
existing Subchapters B and C in Division 2 as well as sections Sec.
117.9010 and 117.9110 of Subchapter H in Division 1 because compliance
dates for sources of NOX subject to these sections have
passed and are now obsolete. Furthermore, sources previously subject
are now required to comply with more stringent rules in existing
Subchapter B and C, Division 4 and in revised sections Sec. Sec.
117.9030, 117.9130.

  Table 5--Description and Sections of 30 TAC, Chapter 117 Approved for
                                 Repeal
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Description                            Section
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subchapter B, Division 2, DFW O3 NAA     Sec.  Sec.   117.200, 117.203,
 Major Sources.                           117.205, 117.210, 117.215,
                                          117.223, 117.225, 117.230,
                                          117.235, 117.240, 117.245,
                                          117.252, 117.254, 117.256.
Subchapter C, Division 2, DFW O3 NAA     Sec.  Sec.   117.1100,
 Utility Electric Generation Sources.     117.1103, 117.1105, 117.1110,
                                          117.1115, 117.1120, 117.1125,
                                          117.1135, 117.1140, 117.1145,
                                          117.1152, 117.1154, 117.1156.
Subchapter H, Division 1, Compliance     Sec.  Sec.   117.9010,
 Schedules.                               117.9110.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A complete summary along with all non-substantive changes
pertaining to reformatting, restructuring, reorganizing, and
administrative revisions are referenced in the Technical Support
Document (TSD), ``30 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 117
Control of Air Pollution from Nitrogen Compounds,'' a copy of which is
posted in the docket of this rule.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with the requirements of 1
CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
revisions to the Texas regulations as described in the Final Action
section above. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
documents generally available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the EPA Region 6 office.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a

SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 13, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
oxides, Ozone, Reasonably available control technology, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: March 30, 2016.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart SS--Texas

0
2. In Sec.  52.2270(c), the table titled ``EPA Approved Regulations in
the Texas SIP'' is amended by:
0
a. Removing the entries for Sections 117.200, 117.203, 117.205,
117.210, 117.215, 117.223, 117.225, 117.230, 117.235, 117.240, 117.245,
117.252, 117.254, 117.256, 117.1100, 117.1103, 117.1105, 117.1110,
117.1115, 117.1120, 117.1135, 117.1140, 117.1145, 117.1152, 117.1154,
117.1156, 117.1300, 117.1356, 117.9010, and 117.9110 under Chapter
117--Control of Air Pollution from Nitrogen Compounds; and
0
b. Adding the entries for Sections 117.405 and 117.452 in numerical
order under Chapter 117--Control of Air Pollution from Nitrogen
Compounds; and
0
c. Revising the entries for Sections 117.10, 117.400, 117.403, 117.410,
117.423, 117.430, 117.435, 117.440, 117.445, 117.450, 117.454, 117.456,
117.1303, 117.1310, 117.1335, 117.1340, 117.1345, 117.1350, 117.1354,
117.8000, 117.9030, 117.9130, and 117.9800 under Chapter 117--Control
of Air Pollution from Nitrogen Compounds.
    The amendments read as follows:

Sec.  52.2270  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                    EPA Approved Regulations in the Texas SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            State
         State citation              Title/subject        approval/      EPA approval date       Explanation
                                                       submittal date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Chapter 117--Control of Air Pollution from Nitrogen Compounds
                                            Subchapter A: Definitions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 117.10.................  Definitions.........        6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                                                        Federal Register
                                                                        citation].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Subchapter B: Combustion Control at Major Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Sources in Ozone
                                               Nonattainment Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Division 4: Dallas-Fort Worth Eight-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area Major Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 117.400................  Applicability.......        6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                                                        Federal Register
                                                                        citation].
Section 117.403................  Exemptions..........        6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                                                        Federal Register
                                                                        citation].
Section 117.405................  Emission                    6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     117.405(d) Not in
                                  Specifications for                    Federal Register      SIP.
                                  Reasonably                            citation].
                                  Available Control
                                  Technology (RACT).
Section 117.410................  Emission                    6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     117.410(d) Not in
                                  Specifications for                    Federal Register      SIP.
                                  Eight-Hour                            citation].
                                  Attainment
                                  Demonstration.
Section 117.423................  Source Cap..........        6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                                                        Federal Register
                                                                        citation].
Section 117.430................  Operating                   6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                  Requirements.                         Federal Register
                                                                        citation].
Section 117.435................  Initial                     6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                  Demonstration of                      Federal Register
                                  Compliance.                           citation].
Section 117.440................  Continuous                  6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                  Demonstration of                      Federal Register
                                  Compliance.                           citation].
Section 117.445................  Notification,               6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                  Recordkeeping, and                    Federal Register
                                  Reporting                             citation].
                                  Requirements.
Section 117.450................  Initial Control Plan        6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                  Procedures.                           Federal Register
                                                                        citation].
Section 117.452................  Final Control Plan          6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                  Procedures for                        Federal Register
                                  Reasonably                            citation].
                                  Available Control
                                  Technology.
Section 117.454................  Final Control Plan          6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                  Procedures for                        Federal Register
                                  Attainment                            citation].
                                  Demonstration
                                  Emission
                                  Specifications.
Section 117.456................  Revision of Final           6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                  Control Plan.                         Federal Register
                                                                        citation].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Subchapter C: Combustion Control at Major Utility Electric Generation Sources in Ozone Nonattainment Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Division 4: Dallas-Fort Worth Eight-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area Utility Electric Generation Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 117.1303...............  Exemptions..........        6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                                                        Federal Register
                                                                        citation].
Section 117.1310...............  Emission                    6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     117.1310(b) Not in
                                  Specifications for                    Federal Register      SIP.
                                  Eight-Hour                            citation].
                                  Attainment
                                  Demonstration.
Section 117.1335...............  Initial                     6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                  Demonstration of                      Federal Register
                                  Compliance.                           citation].
Section 117.1340...............  Continuous                  6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                  Demonstration of                      Federal Register
                                  Compliance.                           citation].
Section 117.1345...............  Notification,               6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                  Recordkeeping, and                    Federal Register
                                  Reporting                             citation].
                                  Requirements.
Section 117.1350...............  Initial Control Plan        6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                  Procedures.                           Federal Register
                                                                        citation].
Section 117.1354...............  Final Control Plan          6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                  Procedures for                        Federal Register
                                  Attainment                            citation].
                                  Demonstration
                                  Emission
                                  Specifications.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            Subchapter G: General Monitoring and Testing Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Division 1: Compliance Stack Testing and Report Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 117.8000...............  Stack Testing              6/3//2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                  Requirements.                         Federal Register
                                                                        citation].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Subchapter H: Administrative Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Division 1: Compliance Schedules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
Section 117.9030...............  Compliance Schedule         6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                  for Dallas-Fort                       Federal Register
                                  Worth Eight-Hour                      citation].
                                  Ozone Nonattainment
                                  Area Major Sources.

                                                  * * * * * * *
Section 117.9130...............  Compliance Schedule         6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                  For Dallas-Fort                       Federal Register
                                  Worth Eight-Hour                      citation].
                                  Ozone Nonattainment
                                  Area Utility
                                  Electric Generation
                                  Sources.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Division 2: Compliance Flexibility
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 117.9800...............  Use of Emission             6/3/2015  4/13/2016 [Insert     ...................
                                  Credits For                           Federal Register
                                  Compliance.                           citation].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2016-08158 Filed 4-12-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P