[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 142 (Tuesday, July 26, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44486-44487]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15894]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0466]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of a New Approval of Information Collection: Federal Aviation
Administration Unmanned Aircraft Systems Support Center Case Management
System

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval for a new information collection.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Unmanned Aircraft Systems
(UAS) Support Center Case Management System (CMS) is being created to
help streamline how stakeholders' questions are answered in a timely
manner. Specifically, the Contact Customer Support form allows the
public and other stakeholders to ask the FAA questions, as well as get
the appropriate answer or information they need to operate their UAS or
drone safely. The UAS Support Center has a publicly available form to
submit inquiries. This form would be replacing the current web form to
be used within the Salesforce solutions that allows UAS Integration
Office additional technology to more efficient and streamline the UAS
Support center business process. This form would allow the UAS
Integration Office to collect the appropriate information about the
stakeholder's name, preferred method of communications email address,
phone number, zip code, type of flyer that would allow the Support
Center Analysts to answer the customer's specific question more
efficiently.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by August 25, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Please send written comments:
    By Electronic Docket: www.regulations.gov (Enter docket number into
search field).
    By mail: Mark Hyatt, 490 L'Enfant Plaza, Suite 2206, Washington, DC
20024.
    By fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Hyatt by email at:
[email protected]; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-XXXX.
    Title: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Unmanned Aircraft
Systems (UAS) Support Center Case Management System (CMS).
    Form Numbers: Customer Inquiry form; Customer Inquiry Status Check
Form.
    Type of Review: New Information Collection.
    Background: The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the following collection of information
was published on June 7, 2021 (Document Citation: 86 FR 30368).
    The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Unmanned Aircraft Systems

(UAS) Support Center Case Management System (CMS) will streamline how
respondents' questions will be answered. Specifically, the UAS Support
Center CMS Customer Inquiry form allows the public and other
stakeholders to ask the FAA questions, as well as get the appropriate
answer/information that is needed to operate their UAS or drone safely.
    The UAS Support Center will have a publicly available form to
submit inquiries. This form will allow the UAS Support Center to
collect the appropriate information about the respondent's name (i.e.,
first and last), preferred method of communications (i.e., email or
phone), email address, phone number, zip code (if needed), self-
identification of type of flyer (i.e., recreational, commercial/
business, public safety, local government, educational/research,
Eyewitness Report, I don't know, and other), the subject of the
inquiry, and inquiry/question). This information will allow the UAS
Support Center Analysts more information to efficiently answer the
respondent's specific question.
    The respondents public form process starts with submitting an
inquiry by using the public webform, shared email inbox, or by calling
the UAS Support Center Analysts. Once the public user submits an
inquiry, they will receive an automated system email receipt that
includes inquiry reference number, created date, ``tell us about
yourself,'' subject, and their inquiry/question. The public users can
also use the inquiry status public page to check their inquiry status.
For a public user to check the status of an inquiry, the system
requires the user to have and enter the reference number and email
address that is used to when creating the inquiry. Once the system
confirms that the email address and reference number match with the
inquiry record that's currently in the system, it will display inquiry
status and created date of the inquiry.
    The FAA received comments to the 60-day Federal Register Notice
from the Small UAV Coalition, MAC Law, and one individual.
     The FAA considered all comments equally.
     The FAA agrees with the request for the system to send a
confirmation email with the confirmation tracking code to track the
status of the inquiry, similar to the www.regulations.gov website. This
functionality is built into the system and will not allow for members
of the public to view the status of another stakeholder's inquiry.
     The Case Management System collects appropriate
information about the stakeholder's name, preferred method of
communication, phone number, zip code, and type of flyer to facilitate
quick resolution of stakeholder inquiries. It will provide a historical
record of an individual's inquiries for the UAS Support Center to
reference.
     The FAA references the support center on FAA.gov/uas, UAS
events, community partnerships and social media.
     The FAA provides the opportunity for a stakeholder to
contact the FAA UAS Support Center by phone and/or email.The FAA
commits to protecting personally identifiable information (PII) in
response to a Freedom of Information Act request, under 5 U.S.C.
552(b)(6). In response, a text-based warning to avoid including PII
will be included on the inquiry page to prevent unnecessary collection
of this information.
    Respondents: Anyone may use the publicly available form to submit
an inquiry. The respondent may submit any number of inquiries.
    Frequency: N/A.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: Less than two minutes for a
typical inquiry.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: The majority of respondents submit a
one- time inquiry. The annual burden per respondent per inquiry is two
minutes. Estimate around 22,000 inquiries per year equating to 44,000
minutes of total burden to the public per year.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Danielle Corbett,
Manager, UAS Integration Office, Program and Data Management, AUS-410.
[FR Doc. 2022-15894 Filed 7-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11102-11104]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04326]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0025; FRL-9907-06]

Notice of Receipt of Pesticide Products; Registration
Applications To Register New Uses

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt of applications to register new
uses for pesticide products containing currently registered active
ingredients pursuant to the provisions of section 3(c) of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended. This
notice provides the public with an opportunity to comment on the
applications.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 31, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number and the EPA Registration Number or EPA File Symbol of
interest as shown in the body of this document, by one of the following
methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.htm.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Lewis, Antimicrobials Division
(AD) (7510P), email address:

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Lois Rossi, Registration Division (RD) (7505P),
email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>main telephone number: (703) 305-
7090, Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. As part of the
mailing address, include the contact person's name, division, and mail
code. Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. Registration Applications

    EPA has received applications to register new uses for pesticide
products containing currently registered active ingredients. Pursuant
to the provisions of FIFRA section 3(c)(4), EPA is hereby providing
notice of receipt and opportunity to comment on these applications.
Notice of receipt of these applications does not imply a decision by
the Agency on these applications. For actions being evaluated under the
Agency's public participation process for registration actions, there
will be an additional opportunity for a 30-day public comment period on
the proposed decision. Please see the Agency's public participation Web
site for additional information on this process (http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/regulating/registration-public-involvement.html ). EPA
received the following applications to register new uses for pesticide
products containing currently registered active ingredients:
    1. EPA Registration Numbers: 100-1067 and 100-1431. Docket ID
number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0729. Applicant: Syngenta Crop Protection, P.O.
Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419-8300. Active ingredient: Paraquat
dichloride. Product type: Herbicide. Proposed uses: Arracacha;
arrowroot; artichoke, Chinese; artichoke, Jerusalem; canna, edible;
cassava, bitter and sweet; chayote (root); chufa; dasheen; ginger;
leren; sweet potato; tanier; turmeric; yam, bean; and yam, true. (RD)
    2. EPA Registration Symbol/EPA Registration Number: 264-RRAO and
264-1137. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0013. Applicant: Bayer
CropScience, P.O. Box 12014, 2 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle
Park, NC 27709. Active ingredient: Fluoxastrobin. Product type:
Fungicide. Proposed uses: For use as a seed treatment on corn to aid in
the control of seed borne and soilborne fungi, Penicillium spp. and
Aspergillus spp., causing seed and seedling blights; and to aid in
suppression of late season stalk rot caused by Fusarium spp. and
Colletotrichum graminicola. (RD)
    3. EPA Registration Numbers: 264-776 and 264-1055. Docket ID
number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0504. Applicant: Bayer CropScience, P.O. Box
12014, 2 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. Active
ingredient: Trifloxystrobin. Product type: Fungicide. Proposed uses:
Dry pea, chickpea, and lentil. (RD)
    4. EPA Registration Symbol: 352-III. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-
2014-0007. Applicant: E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, 1007 Market
Street, Wilmington, DE 19898. Active ingredient: Picoxystrobin. Product
type: Herbicide. Proposed use: End-use product intended for treatment
of canola, corn and soybean seeds. (RD)
    5. EPA Registration Symbols/EPA Registration Number: 499-LTN, 499-
LAO, and 7969-299. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0793. Applicant:
BASF Corporation, Whitmire Micro-Gen Research Laboratories, 3568 Tree
Court Industrial Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63122-6682. Active ingredient:
Alpha-Cypermethrin. Product type: Insecticide. Proposed use: Indoor
non-food handling establishments. (RD)
    6. EPA Registration Numbers: 7969-185, 7969-199, and 7969-258.
Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0798. Applicant: BASF Corporation,
P.O. Box 13528, 26 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
Active ingredient: Pyraclostrobin. Product type: Fungicide. Proposed
uses: Herbs, Subgroup 19A; Dill; Stone Fruit, Group 12-12 (conversion);
and Tree Nut, Group 14-12 (conversion). (RD)
    7. EPA Registration Numbers: 7969-198 and 7969-199. Docket ID
number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0797. Applicant: BASF Corporation, P.O. Box
13528, 26 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. Active
ingredient: Boscalid. Product type: Fungicide. Proposed uses: Herbs,
Subgroup 19A; Dill; Stone Fruit, Group 12-12 (conversion); Tree Nut,
Group 14-12 (conversion). (RD)
    8. EPA Registration Numbers: 7969-283 and 7969-284. Docket ID
number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0255. Applicant: BASF Corporation, P.O. Box
13528, 26 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. Active
ingredient: Metrafenone. Product type: Fungicide. Proposed uses: Peach,
Subgroup 12-12B; Apricot; Cherry, Subgroup 12-12A; Hop, dried cones;
Vegetable, cucurbit, Group 9; and Fruit, small, vine climbing, except
fuzzy kiwifruit, Subgroup 13-07F. (RD)

    9. EPA Registration Symbol: 59441-RR. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-
2014-0017. Applicant: Eastman Kodak Company, 343 State St., Rochester,
NY 14650. Active ingredient: Copper sulfate pentahydrate. Product type:
Antimicrobial. Proposed use: Material preservative. (AD)
    10. EPA Registration Number: 82552-1. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-
2013-0826. Applicant: Siamons International, Inc., 48 Galaxy Blvd.,
Unit 413, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M9W 6C8. Active ingredient: Sodium
carbonate. Product type: Antimicrobial, Fungistat, and Mildewstat.
Proposed uses: HVAC Systems. (AD)
    11. EPA Registration Number: 84034-1. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-
2014-0016. Applicant: Mexel USA, LLC, 1655 North Fort Myer Drive, Suite
350, Arlington, VA 22209. Active ingredient: 1-(Alkyl amino)-3
aminopropane. Product type: Molluscicide/antifoulant. Proposed use:
End-use product intended to control bio-fouling in once through and
recirculating cooling towers. (AD)

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: February 12, 2014.
Daniel J. Rosenblatt,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014-04326 Filed 2-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: April 26, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 80)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 24627-24633]
[DOCID:fr26ap06-25]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[EPA-HQ-SFUND-1987-0002; FRL-8161-6]

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of intent for partial deletion of the Rocky Mountain
Arsenal National Priorities List Site from the National Priorities
List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 8 announces
its intent to delete the Internal Parcel, encompassing 7,399 acres of
the Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Priorities List Site (RMA/NPL Site)
On-Post Operable Unit (OU), from the National Priorities List (NPL) and
requests public comment on this proposed action. The NPL constitutes
Appendix B of 40 CFR Part 300, which is the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), which EPA promulgated
pursuant to Section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
    EPA bases its proposal to delete the Internal Parcel of the RMA/NPL
Site on the determination by EPA and the State of Colorado, through the
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), that all
appropriate actions under CERCLA have been implemented to protect human
health, welfare and the environment and that no further response action
by responsible parties is appropriate.
    This partial deletion pertains to the surface media (soil, surface
water, sediment) and structures within the Internal Parcel of the On-
Post OU of the RMA/NPL Site as well as the groundwater below the
Internal Parcel that is east of E Street, with the exception of a small
area of contaminated groundwater located in the northwest corner of
Section 6. The rest of the On-Post OU, including groundwater below RMA
that is west of E Street, and the Off-Post OU will remain on the NPL
and response activities will continue at those OUs.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before on or before May 26,
2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-1987-0002, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instruction

for submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>
     Mail: Ms. Jennifer Chergo, Community Involvement
Coordinator (8OC), U.S. EPA, Region 8, 999 18th Street, Suite 300,
Denver, Colorado, 80202-2466.
     Hand Delivery: 999 18th Street, Suite 300, Denver,
Colorado, 80202-2466. Such deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be
made for deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-
1987-0002. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site

is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be

automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov
 index. Although listed in the index, some

information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA's Region 8

Superfund Records

Center, 999 18th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466 and the Joint
Administrative Records Document Facility, Rocky Mountain Arsenal,
Building 129, Room 2024, Commerce City, Colorado 80022-1748. The Region
8 Docket Facility is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. by appointment, Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The EPA Docket telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>. The RMA's Docket Facility is open from 12 p.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays, or by
appointment. The RMA Docket telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jennifer Chergo, Community
Involvement Coordinator (8OC), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 8, 999 18th Street, Suite 300, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466;
telephone number: 1-800-227-8917 or<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number: 303-
312-6961; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Intended Partial Site Deletion

I. Introduction

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 8 announces its
intent to delete the Internal Parcel of the Rocky Mountain Arsenal/
National Priorities List (RMA/NPL) Site, Commerce City, Colorado, from
the National Priorities List (NPL) and requests comment on this
proposed action. The NPL constitutes Appendix B of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), 40 CFR part 300,
which EPA promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42
U.S.C. 9605. EPA identifies sites that appear to present a significant
risk to public health or the environment and maintains the NPL as the
list of those sites. Sites on the NPL may be the subject of remedial
actions financed by the Hazardous Substance Superfund (Fund). This
partial deletion of the Site is proposed in accordance with 40 CFR
300.425(e) and Notice of Policy Change: Partial Deletion of Sites
Listed on the National Priorities List (60 FR 55466 (Nov. 1, 1995)). As
described in 40 CFR 300.425(e)(3), portions of a site deleted from the
NPL remain eligible for further remedial actions if warranted by future
conditions.
    EPA will accept comments concerning its intent for partial deletion
of the RMA/NPL Site for thirty days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register.
    Section II of this document explains the criteria for deleting
sites from the NPL. Section III discusses the procedures that EPA is
using for this proposed partial deletion. Section IV discusses the
Internal Parcel of the RMA/NPL Site and explains how it meets the
deletion criteria.

II. NPL Deletion Criteria

    The NCP establishes the criteria that EPA uses to delete sites from
the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), sites may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response is appropriate to protect public
health or the environment. In making such a determination pursuant to
40 CFR 300.425(e), EPA will consider, in consultation with the State,
whether any of the following criteria have been met:
    Section 300.425(e)(1)(i). Responsible parties or other persons have
implemented all appropriate response actions required;
    Section 300.425(e)(1)(ii). All appropriate Fund-financed response
under CERCLA has been implemented, and no further response action by
responsible parties is appropriate; or
    Section 300.425(e)(1)(iii). The remedial investigation has shown
that the release poses no significant threat to public health or the
environment and, therefore, taking of remedial measures is not
appropriate.
    A partial deletion of a site from the NPL does not affect or impede
EPA's ability to conduct CERCLA response activities for portions not
deleted from the NPL. In addition, deletion of a portion of a site from
the NPL does not affect the liability of responsible parties or impede
agency efforts to recover costs associated with response efforts. The
U.S. Army and Shell Oil Company will be responsible for all future
remedial actions required at the area deleted if future site conditions
warrant such actions.

III. Deletion Procedures

    Upon determination that at least one of the criteria described in
Section 300.425(e) of the NCP has been met, EPA may formally begin
deletion procedures. The following procedures were used for this
proposed deletion of the Internal Parcel from the RMA/NPL Site:
    (1) The Army has requested the partial deletion and has prepared
the relevant documents.
    (2) The State of Colorado, through the CDPHE, has concurred with
publication of this notice of intent for partial deletion.
    (3) Concurrent with this national Notice of Intent for Partial
Deletion, a local notice has been published in a newspaper of record
and has been distributed to appropriate federal, State, and local
officials, and other interested parties. These notices announce a
thirty (30) day public comment period on the deletion package, which
ends on May 26, 2006, based upon publication of this notice in the
Federal Register and a local newspaper of record.
    (4) EPA has made all relevant documents available at the
information repositories listed previously for public inspection and
copying.
    Upon completion of the thirty calendar day public comment period,
EPA Region 8 will evaluate each significant comment and any significant
new data received before issuing a final decision concerning the
proposed partial deletion. EPA will prepare a responsiveness summary
for each significant comment and any significant new data received
during the public comment period and will address concerns presented in
such comments and data. The responsiveness summary will be made
available to the public at the EPA Region 8 office and the information
repositories listed above and will be included in the final deletion
package. Members of the public are encouraged to contact EPA Region 8
to obtain a copy of the responsiveness summary. If, after review of all
such comments and data, EPA determines that the partial deletion from
the NPL is appropriate, EPA will publish a final notice of partial
deletion in the Federal Register. Deletion of the Internal Parcel of
the RMA/NPL Site does not actually occur until a final notice of
partial deletion is published in the Federal Register. A copy of the
final partial deletion package will be placed at the EPA Region 8
office and the information repositories listed above after a final
document has been published in the Federal Register.

IV. Basis for Intended Partial Deletion

    The following information provides EPA's rationale for deletion of
the Internal Parcel of the RMA/NPL Site from the NPL and EPA's finding
that the proposed final deletion satisfies 40 CFR 300.425(e)
requirements. Additional detail is provided in the ``Technical
Memorandum in Support of Partial Deletion of the Internal Parcel
Deletion Area'' that consolidates all information for the 11.5 square
mile area within the On-Post Operable Unit of the RMA/NPL Site.

RMA/NPL Site Background

    The Rocky Mountain Arsenal was established in 1942 by the U.S.
Army, and was used to manufacture chemical warfare agents and
incendiary munitions for use in World War II. Prior to this, the area
was largely undeveloped ranch and farmland. Following the war and
through the early 1980s, the facilities continued to be used by the
Army. Beginning in 1946, some facilities were leased to private
companies to manufacture industrial and agricultural chemicals. Shell
Oil Company, the principal lessee, primarily manufactured pesticides
from 1952 to 1982. After 1982, the only activities at the Arsenal
involved remediation.
    Complaints of groundwater pollution north of the RMA/NPL Site began
to surface in 1954. Common industrial and waste disposal practices used
during these years resulted in contamination of structures, soil,
surface water, and groundwater. As a result of this contamination, the
RMA was proposed for inclusion on the NPL on October 15, 1984. The
listing of RMA on the NPL, excluding Basin F, was finalized on July 22,
1987. Basin F was added to the RMA/NPL Site listing on March 13, 1989.
On February 17, 1989, an interagency agreement--the ``Federal Facility
Agreement for the Rocky Mountain Arsenal'' (FFA)--formalizing the
process framework for selection and implementation of cleanup remedies
at the RMA/NPL Site, became effective. The FFA was signed by the Army,
Shell Oil Company, EPA, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S.
Department of Justice, and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry.
    Prior to the selection of remedial alternatives, a remedial
investigation/endangerment assessment/feasibility study (RI/EA/FS) was
conducted for the On-Post OU to provide information on the type and
extent of contamination, human and ecological risks, and feasibility of
remedial actions suitable for application at RMA. The remedial
investigation (RI), completed in January 1992, studied each of the five
environmental media at the RMA/NPL Site, including soils, water,
structures, air, and biota. The feasibility study (FS) was finalized in
October 1995, and a proposed remedial action plan was prepared and
presented to the public in October 1995.
    On June 11, 1996, the Army, EPA, and the State of Colorado signed
the ``Record of Decision for the On-Post Operable Unit'' (ROD). The
ROD, which formally establishes the cleanup approach to be taken for
the On-Post OU, specified the remedial actions to be implemented for
soil, structures, and groundwater for the On-Post OU of RMA.
    The original On-Post OU of the RMA/NPL Site (see map, RMA Internal
Parcel) encompassed 27 square miles (17,000 acres) in southern Adams
County, Colorado, approximately 8 miles northeast of downtown Denver.
On January 21, 2003, 940 acres known as the Western Tier Parcel were
partially deleted from the NPL. This was followed by the partial
deletion of 5,053 acres in perimeter areas of RMA on January 15, 2004,
which led to the establishment of the Rocky Mountain Arsenal National
Wildlife Refuge on April 2, 2004. As a result of these prior partial
deletions, the On-Post OU of the RMA/NPL Site currently encompasses
17.2 square miles (11,007 acres).

Internal Parcel of the On-Post OU

    The Internal Parcel is an area of approximately 7,399 acres (11.5
square miles) in the interior of RMA. The proposed deletion includes
all or portions of Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25,
26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, and 35, but excludes areas where the
remedy is incomplete such as the former central processing areas,
munitions demolition areas, sanitary sewers, select structures, haul
roads, and designed drainage areas for future covers (see map).
    A remedial investigation (RI) for the On-Post OU, completed in
January 1992, studied each of the environmental media at the RMA/NPL
Site including soil, sediment, structures, water, air, and biota. Based
upon evidence gathered during the RI, areas with similar soil
contamination were combined into individual projects. This resulted in
twelve separate soil cleanup projects within the Internal Parcel. These
include:
    (1) The Burial Trenches Soil Remediation project which included two
remedy sites in Sections 30 and 32 considered to potentially contain
ordnance or explosives, unexploded ordnance, and munitions debris as
well as general construction-related debris and trash, and soils that
exceeded acceptable contaminant levels for protection of human health
(HHE) that was contaminated with chromium and lead;
    (2) The CAMU (Corrective Action Management Unit) Soil Remediation
project in Sections 23, 24, 25, and 26 including Borrow Area 5 and
other areas within the CAMU that contained soils presenting an
unacceptable risk to biota (biota-risk) primarily due to pesticides
(aldrin and dieldrin);
    (3) The Existing (Sanitary) Landfills which included seven remedy
sites in Sections 1, 4, 30, and 36 that contained construction debris,
metal fragments, asphalt, trash, and asbestos-containing material;
    (4) The Lake Sediments Soil Remediation project which included two
remedy sites within Section 1 that contained HHE and biota-risk soils
contaminated with chlordane, chromium, aldrin, and dieldrin as well as
some mercury;
    (5) The Miscellaneous Northern Tier Soil Remediation project which
included three remedy sites in Sections 24, 25, and 29 that contained
HHE and biota-risk soils contaminated with aldrin and dieldrin,
chloroacetic acid, and lead;
    (6) The Miscellaneous Southern Tier Soil Remediation project which
included eight remedy sites in Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, and 12 that
contained HHE and biota-risk soils contaminated with aldrin, dieldrin,
and heavy metals;
    (7) The Munitions Testing Soil Remediation project which included
seven remedy sites in Sections 19, 20, 25, 29, and 30 considered to
potentially contain slag, munitions debris, and unexploded ordnance;
    (8) The North Plants Structures Demolition and Removal project
which included one remedy site with HHE and biota-risk soils within
Section 25 and structures where the nerve agent GB, also called Sarin,
was manufactured;
    (9) The Sanitary and Chemical Sewer Plugging project which included
two remedy sites in Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 24, 25, 26, 34, 35, and 36
that contained sewer lines which potentially served as conduits for the
migration of groundwater contamination;
    (10) The Section 35 Soil Remediation project which included eight
remedy sites within Section 35 that contained HHE and biota-risk soils
contaminated primarily with aldrin and dieldrin;
    (11) The Toxic Storage Yards Soil Remediation project which
included three remedy sites within Sections 5, 6, and 31 that contained
HHE and biota-risk soils considered to potentially contain chemical
warfare agent based on use histories and detections of agent breakdown
products; and
    (12) The Residual Ecological Risk (RER) Soil project which included
80 remedy sites throughout the RMA/NPL Site that were identified
through a ROD (On-Post Record of Decision)--directed process to address
soils that present a health risk to biota primarily due to aldrin and
dieldrin.
    A structures survey identified 798 structures within the RMA/NPL
site. Forty-eight of these structures had no

history of contamination and were designated to be retained for future
use. The contaminants identified within the other 750 structures
include asbestos, pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),
herbicides and heavy metals.
    Fifteen individual contaminant groundwater plumes were identified
below the western portion of the original RMA site (west of E Street)
and consolidated into five plume groups. Treatment of the groundwater
plumes is ongoing through operation of groundwater treatment systems
and will continue until contaminant concentrations are below remedial
action levels. Therefore, the groundwater media below the Internal
Parcel west of E Street is not included in this partial deletion and
will remain on the RMA/NPL Site. With the exception of a small area of
groundwater located in the northwest corner of Section 6, no
contaminant plumes were identified in the eastern portion of the
Internal Parcel; therefore, most of the groundwater media below the
Internal Parcel east of E Street is included in this partial deletion.
    A feasibility study (FS) was finalized in October 1995, and a
proposed plan prepared and presented to the public in October 1995. On
June 11, 1996, the ROD was signed by the Army, EPA, and the State of
Colorado. The ROD required the excavation and consolidation of soil
presenting a risk to human health, as well as munitions debris, in a
state-of-the-art hazardous waste landfill to be built within the On-
Post OU; and excavation of debris and soil presenting a risk to biota
and placement of those soils in the Basin A consolidation area which is
located in the central portion of the RMA/NPL Site. The excavated human
health exceedence areas were to be backfilled with on-post borrow
material and revegetated. Unexploded ordnance was to be transported
off-site for detonation or other demilitarization process, unless the
unexploded ordnance was unstable and must be detonated on-site. The ROD
also required continued use restrictions for the property.
    The remedy for structures included the demolition of the 750 ``no
future use'' structures identified in the structures survey. The
selected groundwater remedy consisted of continued operation of the On-
Post groundwater treatment systems, including three boundary systems
and four internal systems. The On-Post ROD also required the
``monitoring and assessment of NDMA (n-nitrosodimethylamine)
contamination * * * in support of design refinement/design
characterization to achieve remediation goals specified for the
boundary groundwater treatment systems.'' This resulted in the addition
of an ultraviolet-oxidation system to the NBCS for the treatment of
NDMA. Also, water levels in the South Lakes were to be maintained to
support aquatic ecosystems, prevent plume migration into the lakes, and
cover human health exceedance soils in Lower Derby Lake sediments.
Additionally, wells that had the potential to provide a cross-
contamination pathway from the contaminated, upper groundwater aquifer
to the deeper, confined aquifer were to be closed.

Community Involvement

    Since 1988, each of the parties involved with the Arsenal cleanup
has made extensive efforts to ensure that the public is kept informed
on all aspects of the cleanup program. More than 100 fact sheets about
topics ranging from historical information to site remediation have
been developed and made available to the public. Following the release
and distribution of the draft Detailed Analysis of Alternatives report
(a second phase of the FS), the Army held an open house for about 1,000
community members. The open house provided opportunity for individual
discussion and understanding of the various technologies being
evaluated for cleanup of the RMA/NPL Site.
    The Proposed Plan for the On-Post OU was released for public review
on October 16, 1995. On November 18, 1995, a public meeting was held,
attended by approximately 50 members of the public, to obtain public
comment on the Proposed Plan. As a result of requests at this meeting,
the period for submitting written comments on the plan was extended one
month, concluding on January 19, 1996. Minimal comments were received
on the alternatives presented for the projects in the Internal Parcel
of the On-Post OU. Specifically, the comments requested that excavation
of the western tier landfills be ``complete,'' that the health and
safety of nearby communities be protected from air emissions during
excavation and demolition activities, that additional treatment
capabilities or modification of the existing water treatment systems be
considered, and that potential dioxin contamination of the entire RMA/
NPL Site be evaluated.
    The designs for the Miscellaneous Structures, Confined Flow System
Well Closure, UV-Oxidation System and each of the soil projects were
generally provided to the public for a thirty calendar day review and
comment period at both the 30 percent and 95 percent design completion
stages (21 separate public comment periods). Each design was also
presented for discussion at the regular meetings of the RMA Restoration
Advisory Board which is composed of community stakeholders, regulatory
agencies, the Army, Shell Oil Company, and the USFWS. No written
comments regarding the excavation/demolition approach or the proposed
health and safety controls for each project were received.
    Upon completion of the thirty calendar day public comment period
for this NOIDp, EPA Region 8, in consultation with the State and the
Army, will evaluate each comment and any significant new data received
before issuing a final decision concerning the proposed partial
deletion.

Current Status

    The Burial Trenches Soil Remediation (Parts I and II) project was
completed in 2004. A total of 87,790 bank cubic yards (bcy) of HHE
soil, munitions debris and related soil, red ash from mustard
demilitarization, and asbestos-containing material was excavated from
thirty-one remedy sites within the Internal Parcel and disposed in the
on-site hazardous waste landfill. Another 2,119 bcy of material with
lesser degrees of contamination, e.g., biota-risk soils, asphalt
pavement, general construction debris and trash, were disposed in the
Basin A consolidation area. In addition, 520 pounds of ordnance and
explosives debris, and general debris--mostly packing materials, were
removed from two ``Dense Munitions Debris'' areas and disposed in the
hazardous waste landfill.
    The CAMU Soil Remediation project was completed in 1998. A total of
278,532 bcy of biota-risk soils were excavated from one remedy site
within the Internal Parcel to a depth of one foot and disposed in Basin
A.
    The Existing (Sanitary) Landfills Remediation (Sections 1 and 30)
project was completed in 2005. A total of 148,487 bcy of HHE soil,
munitions debris, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-contaminated
equipment, and asbestos-containing material was excavated from two
remedy sites within the Internal Parcel and disposed in the hazardous
waste landfill. Another 1,875 bcy of biota-risk soil were used as cover
for the asbestos-containing material in the landfill. Approximately
14,826 bcy of biota risk soils and trash and debris were excavated and
disposed in Basin A.
    The Lake Sediments Soil Remediation project was completed in 2000.
A total of 30,690 bcy of HHE soil, miscellaneous debris and mercury-
contaminated biota-risk soils was

excavated from two remedy sites within the Internal Parcel and disposed
in the hazardous waste landfill. Another 2,372 bcy of biota risk soil
were disposed in Basin A.
    The Miscellaneous Northern Tier Soil Remediation project was
completed in 2000. A total of 19,400 bcy of HHE soil, debris from one
structure with a contamination use history, and asbestos-containing
material was excavated from three remedy sites within the Internal
Parcel and disposed in the hazardous waste landfill. Another 35,365 bcy
of biota-risk soil, demolition debris, sanitary sewer lines and grout-
filled manholes, and debris from six structures with no contamination
history were disposed in Basin A.
    The Miscellaneous Southern Tier Soil Remediation project was
completed in 2000. A total of 17,676 bcy of HHE soil, asbestos, and
lower concentrations of lead was excavated from four remedy sites
within the Internal Parcel and disposed in the hazardous waste
landfill. Another 20,008 bcy of biota-risk soil, demolition debris, and
structural debris from three buildings and railroad tracks including
ballast and ties were taken from the Internal Parcel and disposed in
Basin A. In addition, a total of 5,919 bcy of biota-risk soil was
excavated and used to backfill an HHE soil excavation and covered with
two feet of clean soil.
    The Munitions Testing Soil Remediation (Part I) project was
completed in 2002. A total of 10,100 bcy of munitions debris was
excavated from two remedy sites within the Internal Parcel and disposed
in the hazardous waste landfill. No soil/debris was excavated for
disposal in Basin A.
    The North Plants Structures Demolition and Removal project was
completed in 2004. Approximately 800 feet of an 18-inch concrete sewer
pipe from one remedy site within the Internal Parcel were excavated and
disposed in the hazardous waste landfill. No soil/debris was excavated
for disposal in Basin A.
    The Sanitary and Chemical Sewer Plugging (Phase I) project was
completed in 1998. This project required plugging eighteen sanitary
sewer manholes within Section 35 of the Internal Parcel with grout. The
sanitary sewer manholes located in Section 24 were plugged, and the
entire sewer subsequently excavated to facilitate excavation of clean
soils from Borrow Area 5. The excavated sanitary sewer was disposed in
Basin A.
    The Section 35 Soil Remediation project was completed in 2003. A
total of 4,375 bcy of HHE soil, chemical sewers, and associated debris
as well as 1,300 linear feet of pipe was excavated from seven remedy
sites within the Internal Parcel and disposed in the hazardous waste
landfill. Another 121,374 bcy of biota risk soil and miscellaneous
debris were disposed in Basin A.
    The Toxic Storage Yards Soil Remediation project was completed in
2000. A total of 3,404 bcy of HHE soil, munitions debris and non-
routine odorous soils was excavated from two remedy sites within the
Internal Parcel and disposed in the hazardous waste landfill.
Structural debris from the demolition of nine ``Other Contamination
History'' buildings was disposed in Basin A.
    The RER (Part 1) project was completed in 2006. A total of 804,348
bcy of RER soil was removed from five borrow areas that are located at
least in part within the Internal Parcel. The RER soil from the borrow
areas was used as gradefill at depths at least two feet below final
grade in areas that will remain in Army control. Twenty-three
additional sites located outside of borrow areas and at least partially
within the Internal Parcel also required remediation of biota-risk
soils. An additional 35,591 bcy of soil was excavated from five of the
sites and placed at least two feet below final grade in Army controlled
areas; twelve sites (including a portion of one that also required
excavation) required tilling with sampling verification that soil
concentrations had been adequately reduced; and seven sites (including
a portion of one that also required tilling) were determined to be of
acceptable risk based on sampling alone. In addition, one of the sites
was eliminated based on existing data and another site, where
excavation also occurred, was identified for biomonitoring. The
biomonitoring data indicated that no further remedy action is required.
    Demolition and removal of 97 of the 183 structures slated for
removal within the Internal Parcel was completed as part of the
Miscellaneous RMA Structure Demolition and Removal--Phase I (completed
in 2002) and Phase II (completed in 2006) project. This project
consisted of the demolition of the structures and foundations; removal
and on-site disposal of structures and foundations, substations, debris
piles, roads and parking areas; removal and disposal or recycling of
underground storage tanks, structural steel and other metal components;
backfilling and grading; and revegetation of the excavated areas. Of
the remaining 86 structures, eighteen were demolished as part of the
Miscellaneous Northern Tier Soil, Miscellaneous Southern Tier Soil, and
Toxic Storage Yards Soil projects; 47 had been demolished prior to
remedial action; and 21 structures--currently in use as groundwater
treatment facilities and supporting groundwater wells and electrical
substations--were incorporated as components of their respective
groundwater remedy projects and retained for continued operations until
each groundwater remedy component is completed and the structure then
demolished as part of that project.
    The North and Northwest Boundary Containment Systems continue to
treat groundwater and minimize migration of groundwater plumes offsite.
The ICS extraction wells met the ROD shut-off criteria and the ICS
facility was demolished and removed as part of the Miscellaneous
Structures project on May 7, 2002. A treatment system was constructed
at the Rail Yard in 2001 to more directly treat the contaminated
groundwater associated with the Rail Yard. The Motor Pool extraction
wells met shut-down criteria in 1998 and their operation was
discontinued. The Basin A Neck Containment System (BANCS) treats
groundwater migrating from the Basin A area toward the northwest
boundary. Until shut-down of the North of Basin F extraction well in
2000, the groundwater from the Basin F area was treated at the BANCS.
Monitoring of groundwater, including that previously extracted/treated
at the ICS, Motor Pool, and North of Basin F, is conducted as part of a
site-wide monitoring program, as required by the ROD.
    In 1997, an ultraviolet-oxidation treatment system was put into
operation at the North Boundary Containment System to treat NDMA. The
ultraviolet-oxidation treatment is a ``polishing'' step performed after
treatment through the carbon filters, and has effectively decreased
NDMA concentrations in groundwater to below detectable levels.
    Lake Level maintenance requirements are addressed through adherence
with the ``Management Plan for Protection and Monitoring of Lake
Ladora, Lake Mary and Lower Derby Lake During RMA Remediation'' and the
``Interim Rocky Mountain Arsenal Institutional Control Plan.'' An
Explanation of Significant Differences was signed on March 31, 2006, to
eliminate maintenance of lake levels to prevent plume migration. This
change to the On-Post ROD is based upon groundwater monitoring data
that indicate lake level maintenance does not affect plume migration.
    The Confined Flow System Well Closure project was completed in
2000. A total of fifty-one wells, twenty-seven in the Internal Parcel,
which extended

into the deeper, confined flow aquifer were closed. Closure was
accomplished by overdrilling the well casing and installing a grout
plug.
    Use of the groundwater below the Internal Parcel and surface water
for potable drinking purposes is prohibited by the FFA, Public Law 102-
402, and the ROD; and will continue to be prohibited even after the
Internal Parcel is transferred to the U.S. Department of Interior.
Additional prohibitions imposed by the FFA, Public Law 102-402, and the
ROD include the use of the Internal Parcel for residential, industrial,
and agricultural purposes, and for hunting or fishing for consumptive
purposes.
    The Army is responsible for ongoing monitoring and maintenance
associated with groundwater wells located on land to be transferred to
the Department of Interior within the Internal Parcel. The conduct of
long-term groundwater monitoring required by the ROD is delineated in
the ``Long-Term Monitoring Plan for Groundwater'' with continued, long-
term access to groundwater wells delineated in the Interim Rocky
Mountain Arsenal Institutional Control Plan.

Post-ROD Investigations

    Since the signing of the ROD on June 11, 1996, five main studies
have been conducted that are relevant to the deletion of the Internal
Parcel. The ``Summary and Evaluation of Potential Ordnance/Explosives
and Recovered Chemical Warfare Materiel Hazards at the Rocky Mountain
Arsenal'' (2002) was conducted in response to the unexpected discovery
of ten M139 bomblets as part of the Miscellaneous Structures--Phase I
project in the Section 36 Boneyard (central portion of the RMA/NPL
Site). Using state-of-the-art computer imaging, mapping technology, and
software capability which had not existed previously, a comprehensive
RMA-wide evaluation for the potential presence of ordnance and
explosives as well as recovered chemical warfare materiel hazards was
completed. The evaluation identified six additional areas for remedial
action (none in the Internal Parcel) and concluded that the future
discovery of additional sites with ordnance/explosives or recovered
chemical warfare materiel hazards is highly unlikely.
    This evaluation also resulted in the identification of five areas
with dense amounts of subsurface metal and debris, three within the
Internal Parcel. A surface sweep and removal of the munitions debris
was performed in each of the three areas. Approximately 520 pounds of
munitions debris was disposed in the hazardous waste landfill.
    In 2001, EPA conducted a four-part Denver Front Range Dioxin Study
which determined that the concentration of dioxins at most of the RMA/
NPL Site, including the Internal Parcel, is not statistically different
from values observed in open space and agricultural areas within the
Denver Front Range area. Therefore, there is no significant health risk
from dioxin in soils to future Refuge workers, volunteers, or visitors.
    As required by the ROD, a Terrestrial Residual Ecological Risk
Assessment was completed in 2002. This report concluded that no
significant excess terrestrial residual risks will remain after the
ROD-required cleanup actions for soil, including additional areas of
excavation and tilling identified as part of remedial design refinement
as required by the ROD, are completed. In addition, an Aquatic Residual
Risk Assessment was completed in 2003. The Assessment presented an
evaluation of risks to the great blue heron, shorebird and waterbird
and the conclusion that there are no significant risks to aquatic birds
in the South Lakes beyond those already identified for remediation in
the ROD.
    Based on the extensive investigations and risk assessment performed
for the Internal Parcel of the RMA/NPL Site, there are no further
response actions planned or scheduled for this area. Currently, no
hazardous substances remain at the Internal Parcel above health-based
levels with respect to anticipated uses of and access to the site,
which are limited under the FFA, Public Law 102-402, and the ROD.
Because the Internal Parcel is subject to these restrictions on land
and water use, it will be included in the RMA-wide five-year reviews.
Operation and maintenance of the On-Post boundary and internal
groundwater treatment facilities will continue until contaminant
concentrations are below remedial action levels, as well as continued
maintenance of groundwater wells for long-term groundwater monitoring.
As a result, all completion requirements for the Internal Parcel of the
On-Post OU have been achieved as outlined in OSWER Directive 9320.2-
09A-P.
    EPA, with concurrence from the State of Colorado, has determined
that all appropriate CERCLA response actions have been completed within
the Internal Parcel of the RMA/NPL Site to protect public health and
the environment and that no further response action by responsible
parties is required. Therefore, EPA proposes to delete the Internal
Parcel of the On-Post OU of the RMA/NPL Site from the NPL.

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26AP06.008

    Dated: April 17, 2006.
Robert E. Roberts,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 06-3899 Filed 4-25-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-C


PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request Environmental Protection Agency / Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance / Office of Compliance 2. OMB control number b. X None a__ __ __ __  __ __ __ __ 2020 3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. X New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c. G Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a. X Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes X No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a. X Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: / /___

7. Title: Region 7 Lead Education and Awareness Project in St. Louis, Missouri 8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable): EPA ICR Number 2161.01 9. Keywords Lead Education, Lead Awareness, St. Louis Lead, Lessors, Lessees, Lead Surveys, Disclosure Rule Study 10. Abstract: EPA Region 7 and the EPA Office of Compliance are planning to conduct performance and follow up surveys for the Lessors and Lessees sectors in areas of high risk for lead poisoning in St. Louis, Missouri. The purpose of the surveys is to determine a baseline level of Lessors' awareness of and compliance with the TSCA section 1018 Real Estate Notification and Disclosure Rule and to determine whether Lessees are reading the EPA pamphlet, " Protect Your Family From Lead In Your Home" and whether they are making behavior changes as a result.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. X Individuals or households d. Farms b. P Business or other for profit e. Federal Government c. X Not for profit institutions f. State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. P Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. G Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 150 b. Total annual responses 150 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 0 % c. Total hours requested 225 d. Current OMB inventory 0 e. Difference 225 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 225 2. Adjustment 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars) a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs $ 0 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) $ 0 c. Total annualized cost requested $ 0 d. Current OMB inventory $ 0 e. Difference $ 0 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change $ 0 2. Adjustment $ 0 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ Application for benefits e. P_ Program planning or management b. X Program evaluation f. __ Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. X Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. Q Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c. X Reporting 1. Q On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4. Q Quarterly 5. Q Semi annually 6. Q Annually 7. Q Biannually 8. X Other ( describe) Twice 17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods? X Yes Q No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Patricia A. Scott Phone: ( 913) 551 7312 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, 1 certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with' 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3): ( I) Why the information is being collected' ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( I) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Official Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Oscar Morales, Director Collection Strategies Division Office of Environmental Information Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 31, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 48675]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18732]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1046-000.
    Applicants: Big Sandy Pipeline, LLC, Bobcat Gas Storage, East
Tennessee Natural Gas, LLC, Egan Hub Storage, LLC, Garden Banks Gas
Pipeline, LLC, Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C., Mississippi
Canyon Gas Pipeline, L.L.C., Moss Bluff Hub, LLC, Nautilus Pipeline
Company, L.L.C.,NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC, Sabal Trail Transmission,
LLC, Saltville Gas Storage Company L.L.C., Southeast Supply Header,
LLC, Steckman Ridge, LP, Texas Eastern Transmission, LP, Algonquin Gas
Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Big Sandy Pipeline, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.203: Enbridge (U.S.) Pipelines--Request for
Waivers--LINK System Maintenance to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 8/24/21.
    Accession Number: 20210824-5066.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/31/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1044-003.
    Applicants: Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, LP.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB 3.1 Standard Waiver Update to
be effective 9/24/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/24/21.
    Accession Number: 20210824-5108.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/7/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1045-003.
    Applicants: Cheniere Creole Trail Pipeline, L.P.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB 3.1 Compliance Update--RP19-
1045-002 to be effective 9/24/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/24/21.
    Accession Number: 20210824-5107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/7/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 25, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-18732 Filed 8-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Please find attached CGA's comments to Docket No. FDA?2012?D-1197