[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 188 (Monday, September 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 58359]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23064]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2014-D-0447]

Internet/Social Media Platforms: Correcting Independent Third-
Party Misinformation About Prescription Drugs and Medical Devices;
Draft Guidance for Industry; Reopening of the Comment Period

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; reopening of the comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is reopening the
comment period for the notice of availability of the draft guidance
entitled ``Internet/Social Media Platforms: Correcting Independent
Third-Party Misinformation About Prescription Drugs and Medical
Devices,'' published in the Federal Register of June 18, 2014. FDA is
reopening the comment period in response to a request for additional
time and to allow interested persons more time to submit comments.

DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comments on
this draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments by October 29,
2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Regarding human prescription drugs: Julie Chronis, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Regarding human prescription biological products: Stephen Ripley,
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Regarding animal prescription drugs: Thomas Moskal, Center for
Veterinary Medicine (HFV-216), Food and Drug Administration, 7519
Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Regarding medical devices for human use: Deborah Wolf, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3414, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
301-796-5732.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In the Federal Register of June 18, 2014 (79 FR 34760), FDA
announced the availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled
``Internet/Social Media Platforms: Correcting Independent Third-Party
Misinformation About Prescription Drugs and Medical Devices.'' In that
document, FDA requested comments on the draft guidance, which responds
to (among other things) stakeholder requests for specific guidance. The
draft guidance describes FDA's current thinking on how manufacturers,
packers, and distributors of prescription human and animal drugs and
medical devices for human use, including biological products, should
respond, if they choose to respond, to misinformation related to a
firm's own FDA-approved or cleared products when that information is
created or disseminated by independent third parties. The draft
guidance also updates and clarifies FDA's policies on the correction of
misinformation created or disseminated by independent third parties on
the Internet or through social media platforms, regardless of whether
that misinformation appears on a firm's own forum, an independent
third-party forum, or a Web site. The draft guidance represents FDA's
current thinking on specific aspects of FDA's evolving consideration of
social media platforms and other Internet-related matters. FDA actively
continues to review, analyze, and develop approaches to a variety of
topics related to the labeling and advertising of medical products,
including the development of this and other guidance addressing the use
of social media platforms and the Internet.
    Interested persons were originally given until September 16, 2014,
to submit comments on the draft guidance.

II. Request for Comments

    Following publication of the June 18, 2014, notice, FDA received a
request for additional time to develop meaningful and thoughtful
comments, especially in light of the concurrent comment period with
another draft guidance entitled ``Internet/Social Media Platforms with
Character Space Limitations: Presenting Risk and Benefit Information
for Prescription Drugs and Medical Devices'' published elsewhere in
this volume of the Federal Register.
    FDA has considered the request and will reopen the comment period
for an additional 30 days. The Agency believes that an additional 30
days allows adequate time for interested persons to submit comments
without significantly delaying the Agency's consideration of these
important issues.

III. How To Submit Comments

    Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to http://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: September 23, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-23064 Filed 9-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 3472]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1280]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR12-11-000]

Pelico Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Compliance Filing

    Take notice that on January 13, 2012, Pelico Pipeline, LLC filed a
revised Statement of Operating Conditions to comply with a Delegated
letter order issued December 16, 2011, in Docket No. PR10-62-001.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken,
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 25, 2012.

    Dated: January 17, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-1280 Filed 1-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Advisory Committee Regulatory Re-evaluation Report - Office of Children's Health Protection

Report of the
Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee
to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Regarding the Selection of Five Regulations
for Re-Evaluation

Submitted by
Dr. J. Routt Reigart, Chair
Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee
May 28, 1998
Report of the Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee
to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Regarding the Selection of Five Regulations for Re-Evaluation

PREAMBLE
The Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee (CHPAC) was formed to advise, consult with, and make recommendations to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on issues associated with the development of regulations to address the prevention of adverse health effects to children. One of the CHPAC's primary missions is to identify five existing EPA regulations, which if re-evaluated, could lead to better protection for children. The CHPAC established a highly iterative process, which involved the development of guiding criteria, review of potential environmental health risks to children, and an assessment of the status of regulation, enforcement, and implementation. The CHPAC, with its broad representation of industry, environmental, health, and children's organizations, arrived at consensus agreements through its deliberations. This reflected the CHPAC members' common commitment to find better ways to incorporate children's health concerns into environmental regulatory decision making.
One key tool used by the CHPAC in its deliberations was the development of seven screening criteria to select rules for re-evaluation that would positively impact children's health protection either substantively or procedurally (Attachment A). The CHPAC approached the assignment to identify five existing regulations from a holistic, health-based strategy. First, the CHPAC considered specific substances and routes of exposure that may pose a greater health risk to children and second, determined which regulatory provisions were applicable. For instance, if the CHPAC determined that new evidence suggests a reanalysis because of a potential risk to children for a particular substance, then it recommended that this information should be considered in all regulations of that chemical. In re-evaluating regulations, children's differential and cumulative routes of exposure should be considered. Thus, the CHPAC's recommendations are listed as issues of concern with the specific regulations identified under each heading.
The five issues selected by the CHPAC are:
   1.     Mercury
   2.     (Farm) Worker Protection Standard
   3.     Triazine Pesticides
   4.     Organophosphates and Carbamates
   5.     Air Quality and Asthma
During the CHPAC's deliberation process, several critical issues that impact children's health were identified but not selected because they were beyond the immediate task of identifying five existing regulations for expedited review or because of regulatory timing conflicts.
These issues represent important opportunities for EPA to address serious potential health risks to children, but broader agency policies, authorities, or structure may need to be reconsidered. Therefore, the CHPAC also provided broad recommendations that merit the attention of EPA. The CHPAC is hopeful that the broad recommendations for process improvements will receive expeditious action and contribute meaningful long term enhancements to EPA's efforts to protect children's health. The CHPAC expects EPA to report back on its recommendations to repropose or not repropose the selected regulations by December 1998, and is also hopeful that it will continue to advise EPA throughout its regulatory re-evaluation process.
MERCURY
Specific Standard to Re-Evaluate:

National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Chloralkali Plants

Other Focus Areas for Multimedia Strategy:

Water Quality Criteria Standard
Regulatory Determination for Electric (Coal-Burning) Utility Boilers
Hazardous Waste Combustion Rule
Medical Waste Combustion Rule
Municipal Waste Combustion Rule

The CHPAC recommends that EPA take a holistic approach to evaluate all sources of mercury emissions. Mercury is a relevant issue to more than one media (air, water), which contributes to its entry into the environment, for example, by electricity (coal-burning) generation, incineration and discharge into water sources. Human exposure occurs primarily through fish consumption. Mercury exposure is associated with adverse health effects in humans. Depending on dose, the effects can range from severe to less severe, most notably, neurological, developmental, and reproductive effects.
By the end of 1998, EPA is scheduled to complete a multimedia strategy addressing mercury. We support EPA's multimedia approach and schedule for the issuance of this strategy.
We encourage EPA to proceed diligently with implementation to protect children from mercury emissions, including those from municipal, medical, and hazardous waste combustion.
Although the CHPAC selected the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Chloralkali Plants for re-evaluation, EPA resources should not be diverted from the evaluation of other larger sources of mercury emission. Important criteria for its selection are that the standard has not been re-evaluated or revised since its promulgation in 1973, children's health was not considered in the original development of the standard, and new information and data based on peer reviewed science suggest that risks to children and the persistent and bioaccumulative nature of mercury were not considered during the setting of the standard.
The CHPAC recognizes the Water Quality Criteria Standard as one means by which the EPA can regulate the prevention of contaminated fish by mercury and ensure children's protection from hazardous levels of mercury. The CHPAC recommends that EPA address the largest sources of mercury emissions expeditiously and prevent further contamination of fish by revising the Water Quality Criteria Standard. Studies have shown that once mercury enters water, either directly or through air deposition, it can bioaccumulate in fish and animal tissue at the top of the food chain in concentrations much greater than those found in water.
Another specific concern is the emission of mercury from Electric (Coal-Burning) Utility Boilers (regulatory determination by the EPA is due in November 1998). Important criteria for its selection are that there is currently no regulation of hazardous air pollutant emissions, such as mercury, from electric utility boilers, and electric utility boilers are the largest contributor of overall anthropogenic sources of mercury emissions in the United States (EPA Mercury Report to Congress 1997).
(FARM) WORKER PROTECTION STANDARD
Specific Regulations/Standards:

Worker Protection Standards (WPS)

Children may be exposed to pesticides through employment in farm work, by eating fruits and vegetables directly from the fields while at work, or by drift from field applications to neighboring residential areas and schools. Pregnant and lactating women who work in farm fields or reside in neighboring areas can also expose fetuses and neonates to pesticides.
The current (farm) worker protection standard has not considered these pesticide exposures to children. Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), EPA has the authority to regulate these childhood and prenatal exposures to pesticides through the worker protection standard including labeling, reentry intervals, personal protective equipment, worker education and training, and posting and signs.
The CHPAC recommends that EPA expeditiously re-evaluate the worker protection standard in order to determine whether it adequately protects children's health. In its re-evaluation, EPA should, for example, consider using standardized data on size and age-specific weight and height for modeling children's exposure when more specific data on children's exposure to individual pesticides may be lacking.
TRIAZINE PESTICIDES
Specific Regulations/Standards:

Atrazine Drinking Water Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL)
Atrazine Pesticide Tolerance

Atrazine is an herbicide that belongs to the triazine class. Atrazine has been linked to adverse health effects including cancer and birth defects. Atrazine has been detected in drinking water throughout the midwest and other parts of the nation. When EPA established the tolerance and 1991 drinking water standards for atrazine, children's differential exposure was not considered and children's differential susceptibility was not fully evaluated. New information has since becomeavailable to the EPA concerning the mechanism of action underlying its carcinogenic effect. Hormonal effects were further investigated and triggered the need for the re-evaluation of both the carcinogenic effects of this compound as well as the developmental and reproduction studies. Reviewing the tolerances and the established drinking water standard in concert will provide EPA with an opportunity to evaluate a chemical's impact on children's health via aggregate routes of exposure. Reconsideration of the tolerances and drinking water standard for atrazine should be given top priority in EPA's implementation of the Safe Drinking Water Act and the Food Quality Protection Act.
ORGANOPHOSPHATES AND CARBAMATES
Specific Regulations/Standards:

Pesticide Tolerances for Methyl Parathion, Dimethoate, and Chlorpyrifos

EPA scientific panels have found that organophosphate and carbamate insecticides disrupt the central nervous system via a cholinesterase inhibition mechanism of toxicity. Because children's central nervous systems continue to develop until puberty, they are particularly vulnerable to the effects of some neurotoxins. Children can be exposed to these insecticides through food, homes, schools, employment, and other sources.
Data indicate that children's patterns of dietary intake are distinct from adults' patterns. When EPA established the tolerances for these insecticides, children's differential exposure was not considered and children's differential susceptibility was not fully evaluated. Of the 39 pesticides registered for use on food, thirteen are detected in food according to FDA and USDA pesticide residue data. Five of these account for 90 percent of the dietary risk of neurotoxicity and three (methyl parathion, dimethoate, and chlorpyrifos) represent the bulk of that risk. Reconsideration of the tolerances for these three pesticides should be given top priority in terms of data collection and other necessary steps in EPA's implementation of the Food Quality Protection Act.
AIR QUALITY AND ASTHMA
Areas for Review:

Indoor Air Quality
Ambient Air Quality Standards (Particulate Matter (PM), Sulphur Dioxide (SO2))


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 23, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 23970]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09635]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

 In the Matter of China Organic Agriculture, Inc. and Guilin
Paper, Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading

April 19, 2013.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Biopharm Asia, Inc., China Organic Agriculture, Inc., and Guilin Paper,
Inc. because Biopharm Asia, Inc. and China Organic Agriculture, Inc.
have not filed any periodic reports for any reporting period subsequent
to September 30, 2010, and Guilin Paper, Inc. has not filed any
periodic reports for any reporting period subsequent to September 30,
2007.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of the investors require a suspension of trading in
securities of the above-listed companies.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the
above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT,
April 19, 2013, through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on May 2, 2013.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-09635 Filed 4-19-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 36 (Friday, February 24, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 11516]
[FR Doc No: 2017-03478]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 36 / Friday, February 24, 2017 /
Proposed Rules

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2016-0611; FRL-9959-42-Region 6]

Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of Texas;
Regional Haze and Interstate Visibility Transport Federal
Implementation Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the January 4, 2017 Federal Register, the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) requested comments by March 6, 2017 on a
proposed rule pertaining to Clean Air Act requirements for regional
haze and interstate visibility transport. This proposal would
promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to address the Clean Air
Act requirement for eligible electric generating units (EGUs) in Texas
to install and operate the Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART).
This proposal would also disapprove a portion of the Texas State
Implementation Plan (SIP) that evaluated BART for Particulate Matter
(PM) at EGUs. In addition, this proposal reconsiders earlier
disapprovals of portions of several SIP revisions submitted to satisfy
the requirement to address interstate visibility transport for six
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), newly proposing that
they be disapproved and that the proposed EGU BART FIP would satisfy
any FIP obligation for interstate visibility transport that would
follow from those disapprovals. EPA is extending the public comment
period for this proposal until May 5, 2017.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 5, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2016-0611, at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio,
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written
comment is considered the official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please contact Joe Kordzi,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For the full EPA public comment policy, information
about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making
effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the
EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all
documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may
be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material), and some may not be publicly available at either location
(e.g., CBI).
    The Texas regional haze SIP is available online at: https://www.tceq.texas.gov/airquality/sip/bart/haze_sip.html. It is also
available for public inspection during official business hours, by
appointment, at the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Office
of Air Quality, 12124 Park 35 Circle, Austin, Texas 78753.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Kordzi, Air Planning Section (6PD-
L), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite
700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number 214-
665-7263; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.
    On January 4, 2017, we published in the Federal Register a proposed
rule pertaining to regional haze and interstate visibility transport
(82 FR 912). Specifically, we proposed to (1) partially disapprove a
portion of the Texas SIP pertaining to the PM BART requirement for
EGUs, (2) address the BART requirement for Texas EGUs through a FIP
including source-specific BART limits on 29 EGUs for PM and sulfur
dioxide (SO2) and a finding that NOx BART for EGUs in Texas
is met by participation in the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR),
(3) reconsider and re-propose disapproval of portions of several SIP
revisions submitted to satisfy the requirement to address interstate
visibility transport for six NAAQS, and (4) determine that the proposed
BART FIP emission limits would meet the interstate visibility transport
requirements for these NAAQS, satisfying any FIP obligations that would
follow from disapprovals of the SIP revisions on requirements to
address interstate visibility transport. We received several requests
for an extension of the comment period and, in response, have decided
to allow an additional 60 days. We are extending the comment period to
May 5, 2017.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
dioxides, Visibility, Interstate transport of pollution, Regional haze,
Best available control technology.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: February 9, 2017.
Wren Stenger,
Multimedia Division Director, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2017-03478 Filed 2-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78162-78163]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31408]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2010-1084]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Upper Mississippi River,
Clinton, IA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation governing the operation of the
Clinton Railroad Drawbridge across the Upper Mississippi River, mile
518.0, at Clinton, Iowa. The deviation is necessary to allow the bridge
owner time to perform preventive maintenance that is essential to the
continued safe operation of the drawbridge. Maintenance is scheduled in
the winter and when there is less impact on navigation; instead of
scheduling work in the summer, when river traffic increases. This
deviation allows the bridge to open on signal if at least 24 hours
advance notice is given.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 12:01 a.m., December 15, 2010
to 9 a.m., March 1, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-1084 and are available online
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-1084 in the
``Keyword'' box and then clicking ``Search''. They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or e-mail Eric A. Washburn, Bridge Administrator, Western Rivers,
Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If
you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Union Pacific Railroad requested a
temporary deviation for the Clinton Railroad Drawbridge, across the
Upper Mississippi River, mile 518.0, at Clinton, Iowa to open on signal
if at least 24 hours advance notice is given for 77 days from 12:01
a.m., December 15, 2010 to 9 a.m., March 1, 2011 to allow the bridge
owner time for preventive maintenance. The Clinton Railroad Drawbridge
currently operates in accordance with 33 CFR 117.5, which states the
general requirement that drawbridges shall open promptly and fully for
the passage of vessels when a

request to open is given in accordance with the subpart.
    There are no alternate routes for vessels transiting this section
of the Upper Mississippi River.
    Winter conditions on the Upper Mississippi River coupled with the
closure of Army Corps of Engineer's Lock No. 20 (Mile 343.2 UMR), Lock
No. 21 (Mile 324.9 UMR) and Lock No. 22 (Mile 301.2 UMR) from January
3, 2011 to February 28, 2011 will preclude any significant navigation
demands for the drawspan opening.
    The Clinton Railroad Drawbridge, in the closed-to-navigation
position, provides a vertical clearance of 18.7 feet above normal pool.
Navigation on the waterway consists primarily of commercial tows and
recreational watercraft. The drawbridge will open if at least 24-hours
advance notice is given. This temporary deviation has been coordinated
with waterway users.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the designated
time period. This deviation from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: December 2, 2010.
Eric A. Washburn,
Bridge Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-31408 Filed 12-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7656-7657]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02737]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER14-1040-000]

Lumens Energy Supply LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding,
of Lumens Energy Supply LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability is February 24, 2014.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic

service, persons with Internet access who will eFile a document and/or
be listed as a contact for an intervenor must create and validate an
eRegistration account using the eRegistration link. Select the eFiling
link to log on and submit the intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 3, 2014.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-02737 Filed 2-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P