[Federal Register: March 31, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 62)]
[Notices]
[Page 17853-17854]
[DOCID:fr31mr11-52]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings No. 1

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1882-000.
    Applicants: Elba Express Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Annual Interruptible Crediting Report of Elba Express
Company, L.L.C.
    Filed Date: 03/15/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110315-5041.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Web site Eastern Time on Monday, March 28,
2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1883-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Cleanup of Feb 2011 EPC Filing to be effective 2/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/16/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110316-5028.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Web site Eastern Time on Monday, March 28,
2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1884-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC.
    Description: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.204: J.P. Morgan Negotiated Rate Filing to be
effective 4/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/16/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110316-5086.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Web site Eastern Time on Monday, March 28,
2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1885-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC.
    Description: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Wisconsin Electric Negotiated Rate Filing to
be effective 4/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/16/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110316-5106.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Web site Eastern Time on Monday, March 28,
2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1886-000.
    Applicants: SG Resources Mississippi, L.L.C.
    Description: SG Resources Mississippi, L.L.C. submits tariff filing
per 154.204: SG Resources Mississippi, L.L.C--Post-Acquisition Tariff
Modifications to be effective 4/16/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/17/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110317-5084.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Web site Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 29,
2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1887-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.202: 03/17/11--Agreements Tariff Baseline to be
effective 4/17/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/17/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110317-5119.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Web site Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 29,
2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1888-000.
    Applicants: Questar Pipeline Company.
    Description: Questar Pipeline Company submits tariff filing per
154.204: Negotiated Rate--Atmos Energy to be effective 4/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/21/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110321-5034.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Web site Eastern Time on Monday, April 04,
2011.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to

be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant. In reference to filings
initiating a new proceeding, interventions or protests submitted on or
before the comment deadline need not be served on persons other than
the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 21, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-7564 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: May 24, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 99)]
[Notices]
[Page 28847-28848]
[DOCID:fr24my10-101]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-62132; File No. SR-CBOE-2010-047]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Related to
Individual Stock Trading Pauses Due to Extraordinary Market Volatility

May 19, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on May 18, 2010, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(the ``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is proposing to amend trading procedures on a pilot
basis for certain stocks traded on the CBOE Stock Exchange (``CBSX''),
the CBOE's stock trading facility. The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.org/Legal), at
the Office of the Secretary, CBOE and at the Commission.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The primary listing markets for U.S. stocks are in the process of
amending their rules so that they may, from time to time, issue a
trading pause for an individual stock if the price of such stock moves
10% or more from a sale in a preceding five-minute period. The Exchange
is proposing the rule change described below in consultation with U.S.
listing markets and Commission staff to provide for uniform market-wide
trading pause standards for individual stocks in the S&P 500 Index that
experience rapid price movement, as set forth below. The Exchange is
not currently the primary listing market for any stocks, and thus, will
not be issuing any trading pauses pursuant to its rules.
    The Exchange proposes to add a new Rule 6.3C to allow CBSX to halt
trading in an individual stock when the primary listing market for such
stock issues a trading pause in any Circuit Breaker Stocks, as defined
below and in proposed Rule 6.3C.03. CBSX will resume trading once
trading has resumed on the primary listing market. If, however, trading
has not resumed on the primary listing market after ten minutes have
passed since the individual stock trading pause message has been
received from the responsible single plan processor, CBSX may resume
trading in such stock.
    The proposed rule would apply to trading pauses issued by primary
listing markets in ``Circuit Breaker Stocks,'' as defined in proposed
Rule 6.3C.03. Specifically, on a pilot basis, set to end on December
10, 2010, Circuit Breaker Stocks would mean the stocks included in the
S&P 500 Index. Thus, proposed Rule 6.3C would be in effect only with
respect to stocks in the S&P 500 Index.
    Upon reopening, a rotation shall be held in the individual stock on
CBSX unless the Exchange concludes that a different method of reopening
is appropriate under the circumstances, including but not limited to,
no rotation, an abbreviated rotation or any other variation in the
manner of the rotation. Lastly, nothing in the proposed Rule shall be
construed to limit the ability of the Exchange to halt or suspend
trading in any security or securities traded on the Exchange pursuant
to any other Exchange rule or policy.
    In addition to adding a new Rule 6.3C, the Exchange has also
proposed minor changes to Rules 6.2B and 52.3. To make clear that the
existing trading halt described in Rule 6.2B applies to all stocks
traded on the Exchange, the Exchange has added the word ``marketwide''
to the title of Rule 6.2B. Finally, the Exchange has proposed to
include a cross-reference to proposed Rule 6.2C in Rule 52.3.
2. Statutory Basis
    Approval of the rule change proposed in this submission is
consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder that are applicable to a national securities
exchange, and, in particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b) of
the Act.\3\ In particular, the proposed change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\4\ because it would promote just and
equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, protect investors and the public interest. The proposed
rule change is also designed to support the principles of Section
11A(a)(1) \5\ of the Act in that it seeks to assure fair competition
among brokers and dealers and among exchange markets. The Exchange
believes that the proposed rule meets these requirements in that it
promotes transparency and uniformity across markets concerning
decisions to pause trading in a stock when there are significant price
movements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Commission notes that the exchange has requested
accelerated approval of the filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2010-047 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2010-047. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the CBOE.
    All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2010-047
and should be submitted on or before June 3, 2010.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Commission believes that a 10-day comment period is
reasonable, given the urgency of the matter. It will provide
adequate time for comment.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-12425 Filed 5-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 2090-2092]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00340]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2017-1246; Product Identifier 2017-NM-086-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc.

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2014-02-
01, which applies to certain Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-2C10
(Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702), Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet
Series 705), and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes.
AD 2014-02-01 requires repetitive inspections of the rudder travel
limiter (RTL) return springs and primary actuator, and corrective
actions if necessary; and replacement of certain RTL return springs.
Since we issued AD 2014-02-01, we received reports that when installing
the RTL return springs, the RTL limiter arm assembly lug can become
deformed. This proposed AD would require an inspection of the RTL
return springs for signs of chafing; an inspection of the casing of the
primary actuator for signs of chafing or missing paint; replacement of
the RTL return springs; and an inspection of the lugs of the RTL
limiter arm assembly for cracks, and modification or replacement, as
applicable; and applicable corrective actions. This proposed AD would
also add airplanes to the applicability. We are proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 2, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; Widebody Customer Response Center North America toll-
free telephone: 1-866-538-1247 or direct-dial telephone: 1-514-855-
2999; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected]; internet:
http://www.bombardier.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW, Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
1246; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2017-1246;
Product Identifier 2017-NM-086-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed
AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We issued AD 2014-02-01, Amendment 39-17729 (79 FR 7382, February
7, 2014) (``AD 2014-02-01''), for certain Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-

600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702), Model CL-600-2D15
(Regional Jet Series 705), and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series
900) airplanes. AD 2014-02-01 was prompted by reports of failure of the
RTL return spring. AD 2014-02-01 requires repetitive inspections of the
RTL return springs and primary actuator, and corrective actions if
necessary; and replacement of certain RTL return springs, including
related investigative and corrective actions, if necessary. We issued
AD 2014-02-01 to prevent failure of the RTL, which would permit an
increase of rudder authority beyond normal structural limits and
consequently affect the controllability of the airplane.
    Since we issued AD 2014-02-01, we received reports that when
installing RTL return spring part number BA670-93468-1, the RTL limiter
arm assembly lugs can become deformed when the RTL return spring
attachment bolt is torqued. We have also determined that additional
airplanes are affected by the unsafe condition.
    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian AD CF-2017-19, dated June 6,
2017 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for
certain Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700,
701, & 702), Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705), and Model CL-
600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes. The MCAI states:

    Transport Canada AD CF-2010-18R1 [which corresponds to FAA AD
2014-02-01] mandated a repetitive inspection and introduced a new
rudder travel limiter (RTL) return spring, part number (P/N) BA670-
93468-1, to correct the potential dormant RTL spring failure. This
[Canadian] AD is issued to supersede the repetitive inspection and
the replacement of the RTL spring due to discoveries made after the
issuance of [Canadian] AD CF-2010-18R1.
    When installing the RTL return spring P/N BA670-93468-1 as
mandated by [Canadian] AD CF-2010-18R1, it was found that it is
possible for the RTL limiter arm assembly lug to be deformed. The
lugs become bent when the RTL return spring attachment bolt is
torqued. This condition, if not corrected, can lead to failure of
the limiter arm assembly lug. In combination with failure of the
RTL, failure of the limiter arm assembly lug could affect the
controllability of the aeroplane.
    This [Canadian] AD mandates the inspection for cracked RTL
limiter arm lugs and modification of the RTL limiter arm to prevent
the RTL limiter arm lugs from bending during RTL assembly.

    Required actions include: A detailed visual inspection of the RTL
return springs for signs of chafing; a detailed visual inspection of
the casing of the primary actuator for signs of chafing or missing
paint; replacement of the RTL return springs; an eddy current
inspection of the lugs of the RTL limiter arm assembly for cracks, and
modification or replacement of the RTL limiter arm assembly, as
applicable; and applicable corrective actions. Corrective actions
include: replacement of the RTL return springs, repair of the primer
and topcoat of the primary actuator, and replacement of the primary
actuator. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at
http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2017-1246.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Bombardier, Inc., has issued Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-27-
070, Revision B, dated March 31, 2017. The service information
describes procedures for an inspection of the RTL return springs for
signs of chafing; an inspection of the casing of the primary actuator
for signs of chafing or missing paint; replacement of the RTL return
springs; and an inspection of the lugs of the RTL limiter arm assembly
for cracks, and modification or replacement, as applicable; and
applicable corrective actions. This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of these
same type designs.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 544 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate that it would take about 16 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $2,960
per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $2,350,080, or $4,320 per product.
    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes to
the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2014-02-01, Amendment 39-17729 (79 FR 7382, February 7, 2014), and
adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2017-1246; Product Identifier 2017-
NM-086-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by March 2, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2014-02-01, Amendment 39-17729 (79 FR 7382,
February 7, 2014) (``AD 2014-02-01'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1)
and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category.
    (1) Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series
700, 701, & 702) airplanes, serial number 10002 through 10344
inclusive.
    (2) Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series
705) airplanes and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900)
airplanes, serial numbers 15001 through 15397 inclusive.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27, Flight
controls.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports that when installing the rudder
travel limiter (RTL) return springs, the RTL limiter arm assembly
lug can become deformed. We are issuing this AD to prevent deformed
RTL limiter arm assembly lugs, which can lead to failure of the
limiter arm assembly lug. In combination with failure of the RTL,
failure of the limiter arm assembly lug could result in reduced
controllability of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Inspections, Modification, and Replacement

    (1) For airplanes equipped with RTL return spring part number
BA-670-93465-1 or E0650-069-02750S: Within 800 flight hours or 4
months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first,
do a detailed visual inspection of the casing of the primary
actuator for signs of chafing or missing paint, and all applicable
corrective actions; replace the RTL return springs; and do an eddy
current inspection of the lugs of the RTL limiter arm assembly for
cracks, and modify or replace the RTL limiter arm assembly, as
applicable; in accordance with Part A of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-27-070, Revision
B, dated March 31, 2017. Accomplishment of the actions specified in
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-27-059 does not meet the
requirements of this paragraph.
    (2) For airplanes equipped with RTL return spring part number
BA-670-93468-1: Within 8,000 flight hours after the effective date
of this AD, do a detailed visual inspection of the RTL return
springs for signs of chafing, and applicable corrective actions; a
detailed visual inspection of the casing of the primary actuator for
signs of chafing or missing paint, and all applicable corrective
actions; and do an eddy current inspection of the lugs of the RTL
limiter arm assembly for cracks, and modify or replace the RTL
limiter arm assembly, as applicable; in accordance with Part B of
the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
670BA-27-070, Revision B, dated March 31, 2017. Accomplishment of
the actions specified in Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-27-059
does not meet the requirements of this paragraph.

(h) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using the service information specified in paragraph
(h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD.
    (1) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-27-070, dated December 17,
2015.
    (2) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-27-070, Revision A, dated
September 01, 2016.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it
to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New
York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or
Bombardier Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If
approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature.

(j) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian AD CF-2017-19, dated June 6, 2017, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2017-1246.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Cesar Gomez,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Mechanical Systems Section, FAA,
New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; Widebody Customer Response Center
North America toll-free telephone: 1-866-538-1247 or direct-dial
telephone: 1-514-855-2999; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected]; internet: http://www.bombardier.com. You
may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards
Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 28, 2017.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-00340 Filed 1-12-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 9, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14106-14110]
[FR Doc No: 2019-06936]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1023-000.
    Applicants: MIGC LLC.

    Description: Compliance filing NAESB V3.1 (Order No. 587-Y)
Compliance to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5020.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1029-000.
    Applicants: American Midstream (AlaTenn), LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Order No. 587-Y Compliance
Filing to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5103.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1030-000.
    Applicants: American Midstream (Midla), LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Order No. 587-Y Compliance
Filing to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5110.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1031-000.
    Applicants: Destin Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Order No. 587-Y Compliance
Filing to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5118.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1032-000.
    Applicants: High Point Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Order No. 587-Y Compliance
Filing to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5120.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1033-000.
    Applicants: Trans-Union Interstate Pipeline, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Order No. 587-Y Compliance
Filing to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5121.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1034-000.
    Applicants: DBM Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Order No. 587-Y Compliance to be
effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5193.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1035-000.
    Applicants: KPC Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Order No. 587-Y Compliance to be
effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5194.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1036-000.
    Applicants: MarkWest New Mexico, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing Order No. 587-Y Compliance to be
effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5195.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1037-000.
    Applicants: MarkWest Pioneer, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing Order No. 587-Y Compliance to be
effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5196.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1038-000.
    Applicants: NGO Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing Order No. 587-Y Compliance to be
effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5197.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1039-000.
    Applicants: Venice Gathering System, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing Order No. 587-Y Compliance to be
effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5198.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1040-000.
    Applicants: Hardy Storage Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: RAM 2019 to be effective 5/1/
2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5199.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1041-000.
    Applicants: B-R Pipeline Company.
    Description: Compliance filing Order 587-Y Compliance to be
effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5202.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1042-000.
    Applicants: USG Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Order No. 587-Y Compliance Filing to
be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5216.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1043-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: OTRA--Summer 2019 to be
effective 5/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5220.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1044-000.
    Applicants: Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, LP.
    Description: Compliance filing NAESB 3.1 to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5223.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1045-000.
    Applicants: Cheniere Creole Trail Pipeline, L.P.
    Description: Compliance filing NAESB Version 3.1 to be effective 8/
1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5224.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1046-000.
    Applicants: Northern Border Pipeline Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agmt--Sequent
to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5225.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1047-000.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: Compliance filing Compliance to Docket No. RM96-1-041
to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5235.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1048-000.
    Applicants: Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Parnership.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: SEMCO Negotiated Rate
Agreement to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5242.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1049-000.
    Applicants: Discovery Gas Transmission LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing NAESB 3.1 Compliance (Order No.
587Y) to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5267.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1050-000.
    Applicants: Cimarron River Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Order No. 587-Y NAESB 3.1 Compliance
to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5294.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1051-000.
    Applicants: National Grid LNG, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Order 587-Y Compliance Filing
Adopting NAESB WQC Version 3.1 to be effective 8/1/2019.

    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5296.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1052-000.
    Applicants: Dauphin Island Gathering Partners.
    Description: Compliance filing Order No. 587-Y NAESB 3.1 Compliance
to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5297.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1053-000.
    Applicants: WTG Hugoton, LP.
    Description: Compliance filing Order No. 587-Y Compliance (NAESB
Version 3.1) to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5298.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1054-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate--Macquarie
Energy contract 510932 to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5299.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1055-000.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Volume No.2--Neg Rate Agmt--
BKV SP338731 and SP339297 to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5361.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1056-000.
    Applicants: Boardwalk Storage Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing NAESB Order No. 587-Y Compliance
Filing to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5398.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1057-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing NAESB Order No. 587-Y Compliance
Filing to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5399.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1058-000.
    Applicants: Millennium Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Compliance to Docket No. RM96-1-041
to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5400.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1059-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmts
(Gulfport 34959, 35446 to Eco-Energy 37888, 37889) to be effective 4/1/
2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5401.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1060-000.
    Applicants: WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing 2019 NAESB Compliance Filing with
Order No. 587-Y to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5402.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1061-000.
    Applicants: ANR Storage Company.
    Description: Compliance filing Compliance to Docket No. RM96-1-041
to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5403.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1062-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Compliance filing NAESB Order No. 587-Y Compliance
Filing to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5406.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1063-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Amendments to Neg Rate Agmts
(Aethon 37657, 50488) to be effective 3/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5407.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1064-000.
    Applicants: Stingray Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing Order No. 587-Y Compliance Filing to
be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5416.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1065-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt (FPL
41618 to DTE 50800) to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5435.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1066-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt (Trans
Louisiana 50890 to CenterPoint 50900) to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5442.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1067-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmts
(Petrohawk releases eff 4-1-2019) to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5449.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1068-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt
(Pensacola 43993 to BP 50937) to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5456.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1069-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmts (JERA
46435 amendment; 46435, 46434 to EDF 50842, 50843) to be effective 4/1/
2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5457.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1070-000.
    Applicants: Western Gas Interstate Company.
    Description: Compliance filing Order No. 587-Y Compliance (NAESB
Version 3.1) to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5458.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1071-000.
    Applicants: Portland General Electric Company.
    Description: Compliance filing NAESB V3.1 Standards Compliance
Filing to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5462.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1072-000.
    Applicants: Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing NAESB Order No. 587-Y Compliance
Filing to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5465.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1073-000.
    Applicants: Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to Neg Rate Agmt (BP
37) to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.

    Accession Number: 20190401-5466.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1074-000.
    Applicants: Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Perm Release Neg Rate Agmt
(Newfield 18 to Encana 2075) to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5467.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1075-000.
    Applicants: Blue Lake Gas Storage Company.
    Description: Compliance filing Compliance to Docket No. RM96-1-041
to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5468.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1076-000.
    Applicants: Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt (Panda
Sherman 624 to NextEra 2078) to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5469.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1077-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to Negotiated Rate
Agreement--Macquarie Energy to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5470.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1078-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Filing--Morgan
Stanley Capital Group to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5472.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1079-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Filing--Seven
Generations to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5473.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1080-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to Negotiated Rate
Agreement--Tenaska Marketing Ventures to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5477.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1081-000.
    Applicants: Bluewater Gas Storage, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Bluewater NAESB Version 3.1
Compliance Filing to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5480.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1082-000.
    Applicants: Guardian Pipeline, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Termination and Mutual
Extension of Existing Service Agreements to be effective 5/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5486.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1083-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Questar Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Statement of Negotiated Rates
V. 15 Summit Energy to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5494.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1084-000.
    Applicants: KO Transmission Company.
    Description: Compliance filing Compliance Filing under Order No.
587-Y to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5511.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1085-000.
    Applicants: Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Compliance filing Order No. 587-Y Compliance Filing to
be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5521.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1086-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Capacity Release
Agreements--4/1/2019 to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5561.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1087-000.
    Applicants: Enable Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Filing--April
2019 to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5567.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1088-000.
    Applicants: Enable Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing EGT NAESB 3.1 Compliance Filing to
be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5569.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1089-000.
    Applicants: WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 2019 Negotiated Rate Service
Agreement--Kentex to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5570.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1090-000.
    Applicants: American Midstream (AlaTenn), LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Order 587-Y (NAESB) to be effective
8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5571.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1091-000.
    Applicants: American Midstream (Midla), LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Order No. 587-Y (NAESB) to be
effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5576.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1092-000.
    Applicants: Destin Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing Order No. 587-Y (NAESB) to be
effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5577.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1093-000.
    Applicants: High Point Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Order No. 587-Y (NAESB) to be
effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5581.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1094-000.
    Applicants: Trans-Union Interstate Pipeline, L.P.
    Description: Compliance filing Order No. 587-Y (NAESB) to be
effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5588.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1095-000.
    Applicants: Enable Mississippi River Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing NAESB 3.1 Compliance Filing to be
effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5594.

    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1096-000.
    Applicants: Enable Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Fuel Tracker Filing--Effective
May 1, 2019 to be effective 5/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5597.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1097-000.
    Applicants: WestGas InterState, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing WGI Order No 587-Y Compliance
Filing_RP19-__to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5599.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-51-003.
    Applicants: Bear Creek Storage Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing Bear Creek Cost and Revenue Study
Compliance Filing in RP19-51.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5192.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-710-001.
    Applicants: Golden Pass Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Golden Pass Pipeline LLC Supplement
to 2019 Annual Retainage Report.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5404.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-78-004.
    Applicants: Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP.
    Description: Compliance filing PEPL Cost and Revenue Study in
Compliance with RP19-78-000.
    Filed Date: 4/1/19.
    Accession Number: 20190401-5410.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/19.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 2, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-06936 Filed 4-8-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 207 (Friday, October 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 63974]
[FR Doc No: 2013-25049]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[ Docket No. CP14-7-000]

Enable Gas Transmission, LLC; Prior Notice of Activity Under
Blanket Certificate

    On October 11, 2013, Enable Gas Transmission, LLC (Enable) filed
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) an
application under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act and Sections 157.205
and 157.208(f)(2) of the Commission's regulations and Enable's
authorization in Docket Nos. CP82-384-000, 20 FERC ] 62,408 (1982) and
CP82-384-001, 22 FERC 61,148 (1983), to decrease the maximum allowable
operating pressure (MAOP) of an existing lateral located in Crittenden
County, Arkansas. As explained in the application, Enable proposes to
decrease the MAOP of Line JM-34 from 680 psig to 460 psig.
    Questions regarding this application may be directed to B. Michelle
Willis, Manager-Regulatory & Compliance, Enable Gas Transmission, LLC,
P.O. Box 21734, Shreveport, Louisiana 71151 or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Pursuant to Section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review (NSER). If a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among
other milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's
issuance of the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for
this proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record
for this proceeding or the issuance of a NSER will serve to notify
federal and state agencies of the timing for the completion of all
necessary reviews, and the subsequent need to complete all federal
authorizations within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission
staff's FEIS or EA.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 60 days after
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of
the regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to the
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, the
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and
not withdrawn within 30 days after the allowed time for filing a
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the NGA.
    Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must
file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate.
Such motions or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant, on or before the comment date. It is
not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons
other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and seven copies of the protest or intervention to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 18, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-25049 Filed 10-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 SUPPORTING STATEMENT

NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS: SECONDARY
ALUMINUM PRODUCTION

PART A

1.0	Identification of the Information Collection

(a)	Title and Number of the Information Collection.

	“National Emission Standards for Secondary Aluminum Production.”
This is a new information collection request (ICR), and the EPA tracking
number is XXXX.XX2453.01.

(b)	Short Characterization.

	This ICR covers information collection requirements in the proposed
amendments to the Secondary Aluminum NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart
RRR).

	The potential respondents are owners or operators of any existing, new,
or reconstructed secondary aluminum production plant. Per the
applicability section of subpart RRR, the following affected sources at
a secondary aluminum production plant are covered: aluminum scrap
shredders;  thermal chip dryers; scrap dryers/delacquering
kilns/decoating kilns; group 2 furnaces; sweat furnaces; dross-only
furnaces; rotary dross coolers;  and secondary aluminum processing
units, which includes group 1 furnaces and  in-line fluxers. The
secondary aluminum industry consists of approximately 161 secondary
aluminum production facilities, of which the EPA estimates 53 of which
the EPA estimates to be major sources of HAP. The proposed amendments
would correct and clarify various rule requirements and provisions.
Specifically, the proposed amendments would add work practice standards
forrequire selected affected sources to comply with the emissions limits
at all times including periods of startup and shutdown for selected
affected sources; add a definition of affirmative defense; add a
requirement to report performance testing through the Electronic
Reporting Tool (ERT); add provisions allowing owners and operators to
change furnaces designationsclassifications; add requirements to test
uncontrolled furnaces; add requirements to test for hydrogen fluoride in
addition to hydrogen chloride in furnaces where fluorine-containing
fluxes are used; add operating requirements such as monitoring of lime
injection rates; and make corrections and clarifications to the
applicability, definitions, operating, monitoring, and performance
testing requirements. The information collection requirements associated
with the proposed amendments to the NESHAP are listed in Attachment 1.

2.	Need For and Use of the Collection

(a)	Need/Authority for the Collection.

	Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires the EPA to establish
NESHAP for both major and area sources of HAP that are listed for
regulation under CAA section 112(c). A major source is a stationary
source that emits or has the potential to emit more than 10 tons per
year (tpy) of any single HAP or more than 25 tpy of any combination of
HAP. An area source is a stationary source that is not a major source
(i.e., an area source does not emit and does not have the potential to
emit more than 10 tpy of any single HAP or more than 25 tpy of any
combination of HAP). Both major and area sources are subject to subpart
RRR. For major sources, these technology-based standards must reflect
the maximum degree of emission reductions of HAP achievable (after
considering cost, energy requirements, and non-air quality health and
environmental impacts) and are commonly referred to as maximum
achievable control technology (MACT) standards. Section 112(d)(6)
requires the EPA to review these technology-based standards and to
revise them “as necessary (taking into account developments in
practices, processes, and control technologies)” no less frequently
than every 8 years. In addition, section 112(f) of the CAA requires the
EPA to determine for source categories subject to certain CAA section
112(d) standards whether the emissions limitations provide an ample
margin of safety to protect public health. For MACT standards for HAP
“classified as a known, probable, or possible human carcinogen” that
“do not reduce lifetime excess cancer risks to the individual most
exposed to emissions from a source in the category or subcategory to
less than 1-in-1 million,” the EPA must promulgate residual risk
standards for the source category (or subcategory) as necessary to
provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health. In doing so,
the EPA may adopt standards equal to existing MACT standards, if the EPA
determines that the existing standards are sufficiently protective. The
EPA must also adopt more stringent standards, if necessary, to prevent
an adverse environmental effect, but must consider cost, energy, safety
and other relevant factors in doing so.

	Certain records and reports are necessary for the Administrator to
confirm the compliance status of sources subject to NESHAP, identify any
new or reconstructed sources subject to the standards, and confirm that
the standards are being achieved on a continuous basis. These
recordkeeping and reporting requirements are specifically authorized by
section 114 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7414) and set out in the
part 63 NESHAP General Provisions. The recordkeeping and reporting
requirements for operating permits (i.e., title V permits) are contained
in 40 CFR 70.6 and 40 CFR 71.6. Under parts 63 and 70 or 71, the owner
or operator must keep each record for 5 years following the date of each
occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report or
record.

(b)	Use/Users of the Data.

	The information will be used by the delegated authority (state agency,
or Regional Administrator if there is no delegated state agency) to
ensure that the standards and other requirements are being achieved.
Based on review of the recorded information at the site and the reported
information, the delegated permitting authority can identify facilities
that may not be in compliance and decide which facilities, records or
processes may need inspection.

3.	Nonduplication, Consultations and Other Collection Criteria

(a)	Nonduplication.

A computer search of the EPA’s ongoing ICRs revealed no duplication of
information-gathering efforts.

(b)	Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB.

	This section is not applicable because this is a rule-related ICR.

(c)	Consultations.

The proposed amendments were developed in consultation with individual
secondary aluminum production companies and trade associations. The
non-EPA persons consulted on the information collection activities are
identified in Table 1.

TABLE 1. PERSONS CONSULTED ON THE INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITIES

Contact	Organization	Telephone No.

Charles Johnson, Jr.	The Aluminum Association, Inc.<PHONE_NUMBER>

Mike Palazzolo	Alcoa, Inc.<PHONE_NUMBER>

Gary Barnett	Aleris International, Inc.<PHONE_NUMBER>

Steve Royer	Logan Aluminum, Inc.<PHONE_NUMBER>

(d)	Effects of Less Frequent Collection.

	If the relevant information was collected less frequently, the
delegated permitting authority (state or the EPA) will not be reasonably
assured that a facility is in compliance with the standards.

(e)	General Guidelines.

	None of the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.6 are being exceeded.

(f)	Confidentiality.

	All information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of
confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency
policies set forth in Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 2, Subpart
B-Confidentiality of Business Information (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902,
September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 39999, September 28, 1978; 43 FR
42251, September 28, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).

(g)	Sensitive Questions.

	This section is not applicable because this ICR does not involve
matters of a sensitive nature.

4.	The Respondents and the Information Requested

(a)	Respondents/NAICS Codes.

Potential respondents under subpart RRR are owners or operators of any
existing or new facility engaged in Secondary Aluminum Productions
operations. Secondary Aluminum Production facilities are primarily
classified under NAICS code 331314, Secondary Aluminum Production. There
are an estimated 161 facilities that would be subject to the proposed
amendments to the NESHAP.

 (b)	Information Requested.

	(i) Data Items, Including Recordkeeping Requirements. Attachment 1,
Information Requirements, summarizes the data items, including
recordkeeping and reporting requirements, for the Secondary Aluminum
Production source category.

	(ii) Respondent Activities. The respondent activities that will be
required by the proposed amendments to the Secondary Aluminum Production
NESHAP are identified in Table 3 and are introduced in section 6(a).

(iii) Summary of Requirements. The EPA is including in Table 2 an
estimate of the burden associated with performing an affirmative
defense. The EPA is providing this as an illustrative example of the
potential additional administrative burden a source may incur to assert
an Affirmative Defense in response to an action to enforce the standards
set forth in subpart RRR.

This illustrative estimate is not considered a duplicate estimate of
cost under the General Duty to Minimize Emissions clause under 40 CFR
63.6(e)(1)(i), which states: “At all times, the owner and operator
must operate and maintain any affected source, including associated air
pollution control equipment and monitoring equipment, in a manner
consistent with safety and good air pollution control practices for
minimizing emissions. Determining whether such operation and maintenance
procedures are being used will be based on information available to the
Administrator which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring
results, review of operation and maintenance procedures, review of
operation and maintenance records, and inspection of the source.”

To provide the public with an estimate of the relative magnitude of the
burden associated with an assertion of the affirmative defense position
adopted by a source, the EPA provides an administrative adjustment to
this ICR that estimates the costs of the notification, recordkeeping and
reporting requirements associated with the assertion of the affirmative
defense. The EPA’s estimate for the required notification, reports and
records, including the root cause analysis, associated with a single
incident totals approximately $3,142 and is based on the time and effort
required of a source to review relevant data, interview plant employees
and document the events surrounding a malfunction that has caused an
exceedance of an emission limit. The estimate also includes time to
produce and retain the records and reports for submission to the EPA.
The EPA provides this illustrative estimate of this burden because these
costs are only incurred if there has been a violation and a source
chooses to take advantage of the affirmative defense.

In this source category, we estimate that one facility per year will
have a control device malfunction that would cause an exceedence of an
emission limit and for which the facility would choose to assert the use
of the affirmative defense provisions. Thus for this source category,
the EPA is assigning annual burden of $3,142 associated with affirmative
defense.

TABLE 2. COST ESTIMATE FOR ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS

Personnel	Number of Personnel	Time Requirement (hours)	Total Hours
Hourly Rate ($/hr)	Total

Technical Personnel	3	6	18	98.20	$ 1,768

Managerial Personnel	2	6	12	114.49	$ 1,374

Total	5

30

$ 3,142

5.	The Information Collected–Agency Activities, Collection Methodology
and Information Management

(a)	Agency Activities.

	The Agency activities associated with the proposed amendments to the
Secondary Aluminum Production NESHAP are provided in Table 4 and are
introduced in section 6(c).

(b)	Collection Methodology and Management.

	Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and
published for use in compliance and enforcement programs of the
delegated permitting authority. The EPA is the permitting authority
until the state or local agency is delegated authority to implement the
final amendments to the rule. Therefore, information contained in any
report submitted to the Regional Administrator will be entered into the
Air Facility System (AFS), which is operated and maintained by the
EPA’s Office of Compliance. AFS is the EPA’s database for the
collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for
approximately 125,000 industrial and government-owned facilities. The
EPA uses the AFS for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement
by local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA
headquarters. The EPA and its delegated authorities can edit, store,
retrieve and analyze the compliance data.

(c)	Small Entity Flexibility.

	The Small Business Administration defines a small entity engaging in
Secondary Aluminum Production as a firm having no more than 750
employees. Of the 3128 entities affected by this proposed rule, tennine
of them are small. Of these ten, only one isnine, all of them are
estimated to experience a positivenegative cost (i.e., a cost savings)
as a result of the rule, and that one small entity will have an impact
that is an annualized cost of less than 0.01 percent of its sales. After
considering the economic impacts of these proposed changes on small
entities, this action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. To reduce impacts, we are
proposing new provisions that would increase the industry’s
flexibility as to how they operate group 1 furnaces. In addition, we are
correcting certain provisions of the rule as well as proposing revisions
to help clarify the rule’s intent.

(d)	Collection Schedule.

	The specific frequency for each information collection activity within
this request is shown in Table 3 for the Secondary Aluminum Production
source category.

6.	Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection

(a)	Estimating Respondent Burden.

	The annual burden estimates for the proposed amendments to the
Secondary Aluminum Production NESHAP are shown in Table 3. These numbers
were derived from estimates based on the EPA’s experience with other
standards. No burden estimates are provided for new sources because no
new facilities are expected to become affected sources during the
three-year implementation period of this ICR.  Because all the proposed
amendments to this rule become effective upon90 days after promulgation
of the final rule, the burden estimates provided are for annual costs
for each year following promulgation.

(b)	Estimating Respondent Costs.

	(i) Estimating Labor Costs. Table 3 presents estimated costs for the
required data collection activities. Labor rates and associated costs
are based on Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data. Technical,
management and clerical average hourly rates for private industry
workers and were taken from the United States Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2011, “Table 2. Civilian
Workers, by occupational and industry group,” available at
www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t02.htm. Wages for occupational groups are
used as the basis for the labor rates with a total compensation of
$47.21 per hour for technical, $57.82 per hour for managerial and $23.72
per hour for clerical. These rates represent salaries plus fringe
benefits and do not include the cost of overhead. An overhead rate of
110 percent is used to account for these costs. The fully-burdened
hourly wage rates used to represent respondent labor costs are:
technical at $99.14, management at $121.42 and clerical at $49.81.

	(ii) Estimating Capital and Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Costs.
Capital costs are estimated at $226,000 per facility at an estimated 27
facilities that would need to install temporary hoods and conduct
testing every 5 years on uncontrolled group 1 furnaces. These facilities
would also incur O&M costs for a total capital cost of $246,102,000/yr
per facility as a result of the proposed requirement to test
uncontrolled group 1 furnaces every 5 years. As a result of the proposed
requirement to measure HF emissions, 20 affected facilities would incur
a total annual O&M cost of $1411,000.  The proposed amendments would
also allow owners/operators to switch furnace
designationsclassifications, which would result in total annual O&M
costs for testing of $500,000/yr or, for an estimated 50 furnaces, a
cost of $10,000 per furnace, or $14,706/yr per facility at 34
facilities.

	(iii) Annualizing Capital Costs. Annualized capital costs are
approximately $575,7001,200,000 or $21,30045,200/facility.

(iv) Affirmative Defense/Root Cause Analysis/Malfunction Costs. The
EPA’s estimate for a root cause analysis is based on general
experience to calculate the time and effort required of a source to
review relevant data, interview plant employees and reconstruct the
events prior to a malfunction in order to determine primary and
contributing causes. The level of effort also includes time to produce
and retain the report in document form so that the source will have it
available should the EPA or state enforcement agencies ever request to
review it.

(c)	Estimating Agency Burden and Cost.

	Because the information collection requirements were developed as an
incidental part of standards development, no costs can be attributed to
the development of the information collection requirements. Because
reporting and recordkeeping requirements on the part of the respondents
are required under the operating permits rules in 40 CFR part 70 or part
71 and the part 63 NESHAP General Provisions, no operational costs will
be incurred by the Federal Government. Publication and distribution of
the information are part of the Compliance Data System, with the result
that no Federal costs can be directly attributed to the ICR. Examination
of records to be maintained by the respondents will occur incidentally
as part of the periodic inspection of sources that is part of the
EPA’s overall compliance and enforcement program, and, therefore, is
not attributable to the ICR. The only costs that the Federal government
will incur are user costs associated with the analysis of the reported
information, as presented in Table 4.

	The Agency labor rates are from the Office of Personnel Management
(OPM) 2011 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay. These
rates can be obtained from Salary Table 2011-GS available on the OPM
website,   HYPERLINK "http://www.opm.gov/oca/11tables/pdf/gs_h.pdf"
http://www.opm.gov/oca/11tables/pdf/gs_h.pdf . The government employee
labor rates are $15.63/hour for clerical (GS-6, Step 3), $28.88 for
technical (GS-12, Step 1) and $38.92/hr for management (GS-13, Step 5).
These rates were increased by 60 percent to include fringe benefits and
overhead. The fully-burdened wage rates used to represent Agency labor
costs are: clerical at $25.01/hour, technical at $46.21/hour and
management at $62.27/hour.

(d)	Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs.

There are an estimated 161 existing facilities that are currently
subject to the Secondary Aluminum Production NESHAP. No new major
sources are expected the year following promulgation of these
amendments. Consequently, the number of secondary aluminum respondents
in the year following promulgation is 161 respondents per year.

For the proposed amendments to the Secondary Aluminum Production NESHAP,
the components of the total annual burden attributable to this ICR
include reading the amendments to the NESHAP; monthly verification of
lime injection rates; analysis of performance test samples for HF;
construction of temporary hooding and performing emissions tests on
uncontrolled group 1 furnaces; and when a furnace
designationclassification is being changed, the requisite reporting and
emissions testing to demonstrate compliance. All other recordkeeping and
reporting activities are already accounted for in the ICR for the
NESHAP.

(e)	Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables.

(i) Respondent tally. The bottom line respondent burden hours and costs
presented in Table 3 are calculated by adding person-hours per year down
each column for technical, managerial and clerical staff, and by adding
down the cost column. The average annual burden for the recordkeeping
and reporting requirements in the proposed amendments to subpart RRR for
the 161existing facilities that are subject to the Secondary Aluminum
Production NESHAP is 1,725 person-hours, with an annual average cost of
$165,521. The estimated annual operations and maintenance costs (O&M) as
a result of these amendments is $643,600. 511,000. Estimated annualized
capital costs to the industry for the proposed amendments are
$575,500,1,200,000 for a total estimated annualized costs (annualized
capital and O&M) of $1,219,300711,000.

	(ii) The Agency tally. The average annual Federal Government cost is
$12,231 for 271 hours for the proposed amendments to subpart RRR. The
bottom line Agency burden hours and costs presented in Table 4 are
calculated by adding person-hours per year down each column for
technical, managerial and clerical staff and by adding down the cost
column.

	(iii) Variations in the annual bottom line. This section does not apply
since no significant variation is anticipated.

(f)	Reasons for Change in Burden.

The EPA provides an adjustment to this ICR that estimates the costs of
the notification, recordkeeping and reporting requirements associated
with the assertion of the affirmative defense. The EPA’s estimate for
the required notification, reports and records, including the root cause
analysis, associated with a single incident totals approximately $3,142
and is based on the time and effort required of a source to review
relevant data, interview plant employees and document the events
surrounding a malfunction that has caused an exceedance of an emission
limit. The estimate also includes time to produce and retain the records
and reports for submission to the EPA.

 (g)	Burden Statement

	The average annual respondent burden for the proposed amendments to the
Secondary Aluminum Production NESHAP is estimated at 11 person-hours.

Burden means the total time, effort or financial resources expended by
persons to generate, maintain, retain or disclose or provide information
to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review
instructions; develop, acquire, install and utilize technology and
systems for the purposes of collecting, validating and verifying
information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and
providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to
be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or
otherwise disclose the information.

	An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for the EPA’s
regulations in 40 CFR part 63 are listed in 40 CFR part 9.

	To comment on the Agency’s need for this information, the accuracy of
the provided burden estimates and any suggestions for minimizing
respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection
techniques, the EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0544 which is available for online viewing
at   HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov"  http://www.regulations.gov
, or in person viewing at the Air and Radiation Docket and Information
Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room B-102, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is
(202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202)
566-1927. An electronic version of the public docket is available at
HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov."  http://www.regulations.gov.
This site can be used to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the public docket and to access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically. When
in the system, select “search,” then key in the Docket ID Number
identified above. Also, you can send comments to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention Desk Officer for EPA.
Please include the relevant Docket ID Number (EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0797) in
any correspondence.

PART B

	This section is not applicable because statistical methods are not used
in data collection associated with the proposed rule.

TABLE 3. ANNUAL RESPONDENT BURDEN AND COST - AMENDMENTS TO PRIMARY
ALUMINUM NESHAPa

Burden item	(A)

Person-hours per occurrence	(B)

No. of occurrences per respondent	(C)

Person-hours per respondent (C=A*B)	(D)

Respondents per year	(E)

Technical person-hours per year (E=C*D)	(F)

Management person-hours per year

(E*0.05)	(G)

Clerical person-hours per year (E*0.1)	(H)

Costa, $

1.	Applications	N/A

	2.	Surveys and Studies	N/A

	3.	Acquisition, Installation, and Utilization of Technology and Systems
N/A

	4.	Reporting Requirements

A.	Read instructionsb	4	1	4	161	644	32.2	64.4	$70, 964

B.	Required activities

C.	Create information	N/A

	D.	Gather existing information	N/A

	 E. Write report (changing furnace designationclassification)c	2	1	2	50
100	5	10	$11,019

F.  Affirmative defense reporting/root cause analysisd	6	1

1	18

	12

$3,142

5.	Recordkeeping Requirements

A.	Read instructions	See 4A

	B.	Plan activities	N/A

	C.	Implement activities

Verify lime injection rate	0.1	36	3.6	161	579.6	28.98	57.96	$63,867

Changing furnace designationclassification	2	1	2	50	100	5	10	$11,019

D.	Develop record system	N/A

	E.	Time to enter information	See 4C

	F.	Time to train personnel	N/A

	G.	Time to adjust existing ways to comply with previously applicable
requirements	N/A

	H.	Time to transmit or disclose information	1	1	1	50	50	2.5	5	$5,510

I.	Time for audits	N/A

	TOTAL ANNUAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (SALARY)

	1503.6	73.68	147.36	$165,521

ANNUAL COSTS (O&M)

	      Performance testing uncontrolled furnacese	$129,600

      HF testingftestinge	$1411,000

      Changing furnace designationclassification, testingc	$500,000

ANNUALIZED CAPITAL COSTSgCOSTSf

$575,7001,200,000

TOTAL ANNUALIZED COSTS (annualized capital cost and annual O&M costs)

$1,219,300711,000

N/A = not applicable.

a	This ICR uses the following labor rates: $121.42 for managerial labor,
$99.14 for technical labor, and $49.81 for clerical labor. These rates
are based on the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Occupational Employment and Wages, September, 2011.

b	There areis an estimated 161 existing facilities; no new facilities
are expected.

c   An estimated 50 facilities would change furnace
designationsclassifications once per year.  Testing for furnace changing
is estimated at a cost of $10,000 per facility.

d   See Section 4(b)(iii) above for breakdown of affirmative defense
burden.

e	107 uncontrolled furnaces at 27 facilities would construct temporary
hoods and conduct performance test every 5 years.

f   An estimated 20 facilities would be required to test HF with a total
cost of $1411,000.

gf	27 facilities would be required to construct temporary hoods for
testing at $226,000/ facility, annualized at 7% for 20 every 5 years.

TABLE 4. ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST TO THE AGENCY - AMENDMENTS TO PRIMARY
ALUMINUM NESHAP

Burden item	(A)

Person-hours per occurrence	(B)

Occurrences per respondent	(C)

EPA person-hours/year (C=A*B)	(D)

Facilities per year	(E)

Technical person-hours/year (E=C*D)	(F)

Management person-hours/year (F=0.05*E)	(G)

Clerical person-hours/year (G=0.1*E)	(H)

Costa, $

Report Review:

Review performance test reports and reports from facilities changing
furnace  designationbclassificationb	4	1	4	59	236	11.8	23.6	$12,231

TOTAL BURDEN AND COST

$12,231

a	This ICR uses the following average hourly labor rates: $62.27 for
managerial (GS-13, Step 5), $46.21 (GS-12, Step 1) for technical, and
$25.01 (GS-6, Step 3) for clerical. These rates are from the Office of
Personnel Management (OPM) 2011 General Schedule, which excludes
locality rates of pay.

b	Assumes Agencyagency will review all of the annual reports - including
the 4 HF tests/yr, 5 tests/yr for uncontrolled furnaces and 50
reports/yr for changing furnace designationsclassification.

ATTACHMENT 1. INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS - AMENDMENTS TO PRIMARY ALUMINUM
NESHAP

Requirement	Citation for existing sources	Citation for new sources
General Provisions citation

Lime injection rate verification 	§63.1510(i)(4)	§63.1510(i)(4)

	Measurements of HF in addition to HCl	§63.1503, 63.1505,
63.1511(c)(9), 63.1513	§63.1503, 63.1505, 63.1511(c)(9), 63.1513

	Uncontrolled furnaces that do not comply with ACGIH hooding guidelines
§63.1512(e)(4)	§63.1512(e)(4)

	Changing furnace designationsclassification	§63.1514	§63.1514

 PAGE

  PAGE   \* MERGEFORMAT  1

  PAGE  12

  PAGE   15


[Federal Register: March 31, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 62)]
[Notices]
[Page 17855]
[DOCID:fr31mr11-54]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM98-1-000]

Records Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public Notice

    This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of
the receipt of prohibited and exempt off-the-record communications.
    Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission
decisional employees, who make or receive a prohibited or exempt off-
the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested
proceeding, to deliver to the Secretary of the Commission, a copy of
the communication, if written, or a summary of the substance of any
oral communication.
    Prohibited communications are included in a public, non-decisional
file associated with, but not a part of, the decisional record of the
proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited
communication and any responses thereto should become a part of the
decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or
contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication, and may
request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and
responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant
such a request only when it determines that fairness so requires. Any
person identified below as having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the document on all parties listed on the
official service list for the applicable proceeding in accordance with
Rule 2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
    Exempt off-the-record communications are included in the decisional
record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
    The following is a list of off-the-record communications recently
received by the Secretary of the Commission. The communications listed
are grouped by docket numbers in ascending order. These filings are
available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or
may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using
the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number, excluding the last three
digits, in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC, Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Prohibited:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Docket No.                       File date                  Presenter or requester
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Project No. 460-000.......................             3-9-11  Charles Miller
2. Project No. 2677-019......................            3-22-11  Byron D. Simon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: March 24, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-7562 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P