[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2777-2778]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00707]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Delayed Applications

AGENCY: Office of Hazardous Materials Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), DOT.

ACTION: List of application delayed more than 180 days.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(c),
PHMSA is publishing the following list of special permit applications
that have been in process for 180 days or more. The reason(s) for delay
and the expected completion date for action on each application is
provided in association with each identified application.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Paquet, Director, Office of
Hazardous Materials Special Permits and Approvals, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, East Building, PHH-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
Southeast, Washington, DC 20590-0001,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Key to ``Reason for Delay''

    1. Awaiting additional information from applicant
    2. Extensive public comment under review
    3. Application is technically complex and is of significant impact
or precedent-setting and requires extensive analysis
    4. Staff review delayed by other priority issues or volume of
special permit applications

Meaning of Application Number Suffixes

N--New application
M--Modification request
R--Renewal Request
P--Party To Exemption Request

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 8, 2015.
Donald Burger,
Chief, General Approvals and Permits.

                                         Modification to Special Permits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Estimated date of
             Application No.                          Applicant              Reason for delay      completion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15642-M.................................  Praxair Distribution, Inc.,                       4         02-28-2015
                                           Danbury, CT.
15832-M.................................  Baker Petrolite Corporation                       4          2-28-2015
                                           (BPC), Sugar Land, TX.
14617-M.................................  Western International Gas &                       4         01-31-2015
                                           Cylinders, Inc., Bellville, TX.
13359-M.................................  BASF Corporation, Florham Park,                   4         01-31-2015
                                           NJ.
12116-M.................................  Proserv UK Ltd., East Tullos,                     4         02-28-2015
                                           Aberdeen.
11903-M.................................  Comptank Corporation, Bothwell,                   4         01-31-2015
                                           ON.
8451-M..................................  Special Devices, Inc., Mesa, AR.                  4         01-31-2015
15552-M.................................  Poly-Coat Systems, Inc.,                          4         03-15-2015
                                           Liverpool, TX.
9847-M..................................  FIBA Technologies, Inc., (FIBA)                   4         12-31-2014
                                           Millbury, MA.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                         New Special Permit Applications
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Estimated date of
             Application No.                          Applicant              Reason for delay      completion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15767-N.................................  Union Pacific Railroad Company,                   1         01-31-2015
                                           Omaha, NE.
16188-N.................................  UTLX Manufacturing, LLC,                          4         01-31-2015
                                           Alexandria, LA.
16039-N.................................  UTLX Manufacturing LLC,                           4         02-28-2015
                                           Alexandria, LA.
16061-N.................................  Battery Solutions, LLC, Howell,                   4         02-28-2015
                                           MI.
16137-N.................................  Diversified Laboratory Repair,                    4         02-28-2015
                                           Gaithersburg, MD.
16118-N.................................  Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A.,                       4         01-31-2015
                                           Inc., Torrance, CA.
16154-N.................................  Patriot Fireworks, LLC, Ann                       4         01-31-2015
                                           Arbor, MI.
16189-N.................................  Coffeyville Resources Nitrogen                    4         02-28-2015
                                           Fertilizers, LLC, Kansas City,
                                           KS.
16190-N.................................  Digital Wave Corporation,                         4         02-28-2015
                                           Centennial, CO.
16191-N.................................  Solvay Fluorides LLC, Houston,                    4         03-31-2015
                                           TX.
16198-N.................................  Fleischmann's Vinegar Company,                    4         02-28-2015
                                           Inc., Cerritos, CA.
16181-N.................................  Arc Process, Inc., Pflugerville,                  4         01-31-2015
                                           TX.
16220-N.................................  Americase, Waxahache, TX........                  4         02-28-2015
16193-N.................................  CH&I Technologies, Inc., Santa                    4         03-31-2015
                                           Paula, CA.
16199-N.................................  Schlumberger Oilfield UK Plc,                     4         02-28-2015
                                           Dyce Aberdeen, UK.
15991-N.................................  Dockweiler, Neustadt-Glewe,                       4         01-31-2015
                                           Germany.
16001-N.................................  VELTEK, Malvern, PA.............                  4         12-31-2014
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                      Renewal Special Permits Applications
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Estimated date of
             Application No.                          Applicant              Reason for delay      completion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11602-R.................................  East Tennessee Iron & Metal,                      4         01-31-2015
                                           Inc., Rogersville, TN.
11860-R.................................  GATX Corporation, Chicago, IL...                  4         02-28-2015
15580-R.................................  Wisconsin Central Ltd.,                           4         02-28-2015
                                           Homewood, IL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2015-00707 Filed 1-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 237 (Monday, December 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 76097]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26866]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-96453; File No. SR-MEMX-2022-28]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; MEMX LLC; Notice of Withdrawal of
a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule To Adopt Market Data
Fees

December 6, 2022.
    On September 21, 2022, MEMX LLC (``MEMX'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 \1\ and Rule
19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend its Fee Schedule
to adopt fees for its market data products. The proposed rule change
was immediately effective upon filing with the Commission pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\3\ The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal Register on October 11, 2022.\4\
On November 18, 2022, MEMX withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-MEMX-
2022-28).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). A proposed rule change may take
effect upon filing with the Commission if it is designated by the
exchange as ``establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge
imposed by the self-regulatory organization on any person, whether
or not the person is a member of the self-regulatory organization.''
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95981 (October 4,
2022), 87 FR 61379.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-26866 Filed 12-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

                 stratospheric ozone protection program

	class i controlled substance

methyl bromide exporter quarterly report

      	      1.2    FORMCHECKBOX  Original Submittal    FORMCHECKBOX   Re-submittal

1.3 Number of Transactions Reported	  FORMTEXT        	1.4  Number of Pages Submitted	  FORMTEXT

1.5  Quarter and Year to Which This Report Applies 	  FORMCHECKBOX   1st   	  FORMCHECKBOX   2nd	  FORMCHECKBOX   3rd	  FORMCHECKBOX   4th 	  FORMTEXT         Year

1.6 Exporting Company

	Company Name    FORMTEXT

Street Address    FORMTEXT

City    FORMTEXT        	State   FORMTEXT         Zip Code   FORMTEXT

1.7 Company Contact Identification

Reporting Company Contact Person

  FORMTEXT        	Phone Number

  FORMTEXT        	Fax Number

Title    FORMTEXT

	Signature     FORMTEXT        	Date   FORMTEXT

SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:	For U.S. Postal Service:

Tracking System Program Manager

Stratospheric Protection Division

U.S. EPA (6205J)

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC  20460	For Private Courier:

Tracking System Program Manager

Stratospheric Protection Division

U.S. EPA (6205J)

1310 L Street, NW;  10th Floor

Washington, DC  20005

Information in reports submitted in compliance with the final rule may be claimed as confidential.  A company may assert a claim of confidentiality for information submitted by clearly marking that information as confidential.  Such information shall be treated in accordance with EPA’s procedures for information claimed as confidential at 40 CFR Part 2, Subpart B, and will only be disclosed by the means set forth in the subpart.  If no claim of confidentiality accompanies the report when it is received by EPA, it may be made public without further notice to the company (40 CFR 2.203).

The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 18 hours per response.  Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460.  Include the OMB control number in any correspondence.  Do not send the completed form to this address.

           SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1

        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

                   stratospheric ozone protection program	class i controlled substance

methyl bromide exporter quarterly report

(Sec 82.13)

SECTION 2    TRANSACTION RECORDS

                             (Reproduce additional sheets as needed)

2.1 Company Name	  FORMTEXT

2.2 Transaction Summaries

TRANSACTION #	  FORMTEXT

Recipient Company Name    FORMTEXT        	Street Address    FORMTEXT

City   FORMTEXT        	Country   FORMTEXT           	Postal Code   FORMTEXT

Company Contact Person   FORMTEXT        	Phone Number   FORMTEXT        	Fax Number   FORMTEXT

% of Methyl Bromide that is used, recycled or reclaimed   FORMTEXT

Quantity of Methyl Bromide Exported (kg)   FORMTEXT         Source of Methyl Bromide   FORMTEXT

Date of Export (mm/dd/yy)

  FORMTEXT        	Port of Export from the U.S.

  FORMTEXT        	Exporter EIN Number from Customs Form 7525

  FORMTEXT

Purpose of export is for:	Transformation

  FORMCHECKBOX  	Destruction

  FORMCHECKBOX  	QPS

  FORMCHECKBOX  	Critical Use

  FORMCHECKBOX  	Emergency Use

  FORMCHECKBOX  	Article 5 Allowances

  FORMCHECKBOX  	Lab Use

  FORMCHECKBOX

TRANSACTION #	  FORMTEXT

Recipient Company Name    FORMTEXT        	Street Address    FORMTEXT

City   FORMTEXT        	Country   FORMTEXT         Postal Code   FORMTEXT

Company Contact Person   FORMTEXT        	Phone Number   FORMTEXT        	Fax Number   FORMTEXT

% of Methyl Bromide that is used, recycled or reclaimed   FORMTEXT

Quantity of Methyl Bromide Exported (kg)   FORMTEXT         Source of Methyl Bromide   FORMTEXT

Date of Export (mm/dd/yy)

  FORMTEXT        	Port of Export from the U.S.

  FORMTEXT        	Exporter EIN Number from Customs Form 7525

  FORMTEXT

Purpose of export is for:	Transformation

  FORMCHECKBOX  	Destruction

  FORMCHECKBOX  	QPS

  FORMCHECKBOX  	Critical Use

  FORMCHECKBOX  	Emergency Use

  FORMCHECKBOX  	Article 5 Allowances

  FORMCHECKBOX  	Lab Use

  FORMCHECKBOX

TRANSACTION #	  FORMTEXT

Recipient Company Name    FORMTEXT        	Street Address    FORMTEXT

Æ

摧嬠i

ÿ

(

*

>

@

B

摧嬠ik欀

B

L

N

P

T

t

v

Š

Œ

Ž

˜

š

¤

°

²

Æ

È

Ê

Ô

Ö

Ø

ä

æ

ú

ü

þ

jÇ

kdJ

¤

Ø

x

x

Æ

Æ

Ȁ碖̀Ĵ鐇«혈0룽〜耪퐆＞ۿā؀ā＀ÿ砆

J

ÿ瑹ॏB

摧♱ý

㐀ۖĀ̊x尃曾Ĵ瑹ॏB

㐀ۖĀ̊x尃曾Ĵ瑹ॏB

ç

摧瑟÷

摧瑟÷

摧瑟÷

㐀ۖĀ̊x尃曾Ĵ瑹ॏB

ç

㐀ۖĀ̊x尃曾Ĵ瑹ॏB

摧ݷo

㐀ۖĀ̊x尃曾Ĵ瑹ॏB

㐀ۖĀ̊x尃曾Ĵ瑹ॏB

摧ݷo

㐀ۖĀ̊x尃曾Ĵ瑹ॏB

摧戦÷܀ (mm/dd/yy)

  FORMTEXT        	Port of Export from the U.S.

  FORMTEXT        	Exporter EIN Number from Customs Form 7525

  FORMTEXT

Purpose of export is for:	Transformation

  FORMCHECKBOX  	Destruction

  FORMCHECKBOX  	QPS

  FORMCHECKBOX  	Critical Use

  FORMCHECKBOX  	Emergency Use

  FORMCHECKBOX  	Article 5 Allowances

  FORMCHECKBOX  	Lab Use

  FORMCHECKBOX

     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

             stratospheric ozone protection program

class i controlled substance

methyl bromide exporter quarterly report

(Sec 82.13)

 SECTION 3    COMPANY EXPORT TOTALS

                      (Reproduce Additional Sheets as Needed)

 3.1 Company Name	    FORMTEXT

 3.2 Transaction Summaries for Methyl Bromide

Country Exported To	Quantity of Methyl Bromide Exported (kg)

Commodity Code 2903.30.1520

	Transformation (kg)	Destruction (kg)	Article 5 (kg)	Quarantine and Preshipment (QPS) (kg)	Critical Use Exemption (CUE) (kg)	Emergency Use Exemption (kg)	Laboratory Use Exemption (kg)

  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT

  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT

  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT

  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT

  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT

  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT

  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT

  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT

  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT

  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT

  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT

  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT

  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT

Totals	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT        	  FORMTEXT

	OMB Control Number: 2060-0482

	Expiration Date: 8/31/11

EPA Form # 5900-140, Revised 6/08

	OMB Control Number: 2060-0482

	Expiration Date: 8/31/11

EPA Form # 5900-140, Revised 6/08


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62610-62611]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24883]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: PR12-24-001.
    Applicants: Liberty Utilities (Midstates Natural Gas) Corp.
    Description: Submits tariff filing per 284.123/.224: CP12-42-001
ISRS Compliance Filing to be effective 10/6/2014; TOFC: 790.
    Filed Date: 10/6/14.
    Accession Number: 20141006-5039.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/27/14.
    284.123(g) Protests Due:

    Docket Numbers: PR15-1-000.
    Applicants: ONEOK Field Services Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Submits tariff filing per 284.123(b)(2)/.: OFS Firm
311 Rate Filing to be effective 11/1/2014; TOFC 760.
    Filed Date: 10/2/14.
    Accession Number: 20141002-5065.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/23/14.
    284.123(g) Protests Due:

    Docket Numbers: RP15-32-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation per 154.602: Terminate Negotiated
Rate Agreement--Scharp Resources to be effective 10/7/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/6/14.
    Accession Number: 20141006-5047.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/20/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-33-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Negotiated Rate
for BP Energy K# 510771 to be effective 11/1/2014.

    Filed Date: 10/6/14.
    Accession Number: 20141006-5080.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/20/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-34-000.
    Applicants: Enable Mississippi River Transmission, L.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Negotiated Rate
Filing to Amend LER 5680's Attachment A_10-6-14 to be effective 10/6/
2014.
    Filed Date: 10/6/14.
    Accession Number: 20141006-5092.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/20/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-35-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Penalty Revenue Crediting Report of Natural Gas
Pipeline Company of America LLC.
    Filed Date: 10/6/14.
    Accession Number: 20141006-5187.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/20/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-36-000.
    Applicants: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Negotiated Rates
Filing on 10-7-14 to be effective 10/20/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/7/14.
    Accession Number: 20141007-5059.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/20/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-37-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Amendment to Neg
Rate Agmt (Questar 37657-96) to be effective 10/8/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20141008-5037.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/20/14.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR Sec.  385.211 and Sec.  385.214) on or
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 8, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-24883 Filed 10-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: December 29, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 250)]
[Notices]
[Page 78430-78432]
[DOCID:fr29de06-71]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0694; FRL-8108-2]

n-Alkyl Dimethyl Benzyl Ammonium Chloride and Didecyl Dimethyl
Ammonium Chloride Reregistration Eligibility Decisions; Notice of
Availability

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's Reregistration
Eligibility Decisions (REDs) for the pesticides n-Alkyl Dimethyl Benzyl
Ammonium Chloride (ADBAC) and Didecyl Dimethyl Ammonium Chloride (DDAC)
and opens a public comment period on these documents. The Agency's risk
assessments and other related documents also are available in the ADBAC
and DDAC Dockets. ADBAC is an antimicrobial used in agricultural, food
handling, commercial, institutional, industrial, residential and public
access, medical settings and may be applied as a wood preservative.
DDAC is an antimicrobial used in indoor and outdoor hard surfaces,
eating utensils, laundry, carpets, agricultural tools and vehicles, egg
shells, shoes, milking equipment and udders, humidifiers, medical
instruments, human remains, ultrasonic tanks, reverse osmosis units,
water storage tanks and may be applied as a wood preservative. EPA has
reviewed ADBAC and DDAC through the public participation process that
the Agency uses to involve the public in developing pesticide
reregistration and tolerance reassessment decisions. Through these
programs, EPA is ensuring that all pesticides meet current health and
safety standards.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 27, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification ID
number, by one of the following methods: for ADBAC docket
identification ID number EPA-HQ- OPP-2006-0339; for DDAC docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ- OPP-2006-0338.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460 0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to the following docket
identification numbers (ID): For ADBAC docket ID number EPA-HQ- OPP-
2006-0339; and for DDAC docket ID number EPA-HQ- OPP-2006-0338. EPA's
policy is that all comments received will be included in the docket
without change and may be made available on-line at http://www.regulations.gov
, including any personal information provided,

unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-mail. The
Federal regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index.
Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov
, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP

Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-

4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington,
VA. The hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For ADBAC, contact Jacqueline
Campbell-McFarlane, Antimicrobials Division (7510P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    For DDAC, contact Tracy Lantz, Antimicrobials Division (7510P),
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(703) 308-6415; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; pesticide
users; and members of the public interested in the sale, distribution,
or use of pesticides. Since others also may be interested, the Agency
has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be
affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information subject heading, Federal Register date and page number.
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. Background

A. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    Under section 4 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), EPA is reevaluating existing pesticides to
ensure that they meet current scientific and regulatory standards. EPA
has completed Reregistration Eligibility Decisions (REDs) for the
pesticides, ADBAC and DDAC under section 4(g)(2)(A) of FIFRA. ADBAC is
an antimicrobial used in agricultural, food handling, commercial/
institutional/ industrial, residential and public access, medical
settings and may be applied as a wood preservative. DDAC is an
antimicrobial used in indoor and outdoor hard surfaces, eating
utensils, laundry, carpets, agricultural tools and vehicles, egg
shells, shoes, milking equipment and udders, humidifiers, medical
instruments, human remains, ultrasonic tanks, reverse osmosis units,
water storage tanks and may be applied as a wood preservative.
    EPA has determined that the data base to support reregistration is
substantially complete and that products containing ADBAC and DDAC are
eligible for reregistration, provided the risks are mitigated either in
the manner described in the RED or by another means that achieves
equivalent risk reduction. Upon submission of any required product
specific data under section 4(g)(2)(B) and any necessary changes to the
registration and labeling (either to address concerns identified in the
RED or as a result of product specific data), EPA will make a final
reregistration decision under section 4(g)(2)(C) for products
containing ADBAC and DDAC.
    EPA must review tolerances and tolerance exemptions that were in
effect when the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) was enacted in
August 1996, to ensure that these existing pesticide residue limits for
food and feed commodities meet the safety standard established by the
new law. Tolerances are considered reassessed once the safety finding
has been made or a revocation occurs. EPA has reviewed and made the
requisite safety finding for the ADBAC and DDAC tolerances included in
this notice.
    EPA is applying the principles of public participation to all
pesticides undergoing reregistration and tolerance reassessment. The
Agency's Pesticide Tolerance Reassessment and Reregistration; Public
Participation Process, published in the Federal Register on May 14,
2004, (69 FR 26819)(FRL-7357-9) explains that in conducting these
programs, EPA is tailoring its public participation process to be
commensurate with the level of risk, extent of use, complexity of
issues, and degree of public concern associated with each pesticide.
Due to its uses, risks, and other factors, ADBAC and DDAC were reviewed
through the modified 4-Phase process. Through this process, EPA worked
extensively with stakeholders and the public to reach the regulatory
decisions for ADBAC and DDAC.
    The reregistration program is being conducted under Congressionally
mandated time frames, and EPA recognizes the need both to make timely
decisions and to involve the public. The Agency is issuing the ADBAC
and DDAC REDs for public comment. This comment period is intended to
provide an additional opportunity for public input and a mechanism for
initiating any necessary amendments to the RED. All comments should be
submitted using the methods in ADDRESSES, and must be received by EPA
on or before the closing date. These comments will become part of the
Agency Docket for ADBAC and DDAC. Comments received after the close of
the comment period will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to
consider these late comments.
    The Agency will carefully consider all comments received by the
closing date and will provide a Response to Comments Memorandum in the
Docket

and regulations.gov. If any comment significantly affects the document,
EPA also will publish an amendment to the RED in the Federal Register.
In the absence of substantive comments requiring changes, the ADBAC and
DDAC REDs will be implemented as it is now presented.

B. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?

    Section 4(g)(2) of FIFRA as amended directs that, after submission
of all data concerning a pesticide active ingredient, the Administrator
shall determine whether pesticides containing such active ingredient
are eligible for reregistration, before calling in product specific
data on individual end-use products and either reregistering products
or taking other ``appropriate regulatory action.''
    Section 408(q) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
21 U.S.C. 346a(q), requires EPA to review tolerances and exemptions for
pesticide residues in effect as of August 2, 1996, to determine whether
the tolerance or exemption meets the requirements of section 408(b)(2)
or (c)(2) of FFDCA. This review was completed by August 3, 2006.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests, Alkyl Dimethyl
Benzyl Ammonium Chloride (ADBAC), Didecyl Dimethyl Ammonium Chloride
(DDAC).

    Dated: December 18, 2006.
Betty Shackleford,
Acting Director, Antimicrobials Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E6-22303 Filed 12-28-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


From: Holmes, Jill R<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 12:51 PM

To: Holloway, Thomas C. (Tom)

Cc: Bill Schrock; John Bradfield; Hanks, Katie P.

Subject: RE: Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544

Mr. Holloway,

Looking at the data changes, the stack parameters for emission units
LG09 were revised to represent proper conversion from metric to English
units.  The temperature and velocity numbers appear to be accurate.  I
did notice that I made a mistake on the stack diameter when I changed
it.  The original value of 0.984 ft would be the correct value.  You
may change it back to this original number.

For LG11, the Lime Mud Filters, these sources release at the top of the
filter building which is very near the 5LK stack location.  They are
different stacks.  I have no specific data on the LG11 sources other
than the height and the diameter of the angled fan exit.  There is very
little visible plume coming from those sources.  Since they also
errantly show the same stack IDs, you could also change the LG11 stack
IDs to 542V and 543V for the North (TV#L542) and South (TV#L543) Lime
Mud Filters, respectively.

Please let me know if this answers your questions or if you need any
further information for the BCI facility.

Thank you.

Jill R. Holmes

(912) 717-1768 (office)

(912) 399-6284 (cell)

From: Holloway, Thomas C. (Tom)   HYPERLINK
<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>

Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 3:46 PM

To: Holmes, Jill R.

Cc: Bill Schrock; John Bradfield; Hanks, Katie P.

Subject: RE: Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544

Ms. Holmes,

We are EPA’s contractor for reviewing the revisions to the NEI file
for the pulp and paper industry.  We have reviewed your corrections to
the model risk inputs for your facility (Brunswick Cellulose,
NEI8196).  Thank you for taking the time to prepare the corrections.

We have some questions about the stack parameters for emission units
LG09 (Slaker Vents L511 and L514 & Scrubbers) and LG11 (Lime Mud Filters
(North & South) (L542 & L543).  Specifically, we noted that you revised
the stack height and stack diameter for these emission units and wanted
to know whether there are any changes to be made to the stack
temperature and/or exit gas velocity for these emission units.  (We can
calculate the exit gas flow rate from the stack diameter and exit gas
velocity values that are ultimately used.)  For example, we noted that
you changed the emission release point type for emission unit LG11 from
fugitive to stack at the same time you revised the stack height and
diameter and wanted to know whether you would like to change the stack
temperature and exit gas velocity from the national default values of 72
degrees F and 0.0003 ft (which are assigned to fugitive sources) to
something else.  (If you do not have actual temperature and velocity
values available, we can assign SCC default values for these
parameters.)

We also noted that the latitude and longitude values for the lime mud
filters (as revised) are similar to the latitude and longitude values
for the lime kiln, a conclusion that appears to be supported by the two
emission units having identical scrubber stack IDs in your mill’s ICR
response.  If the lime mud filters and lime kiln do exhaust through the
same stack, we may want to revise the stack parameter and
latitude/longitude data for the lime mud filters and lime kiln to make
them identical.  How would you like to proceed?

Thanks for looking into this for us.  We really appreciate it.  Let us
know if you have any questions.

Thomas Holloway

RTI International

  HYPERLINK<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
1-877-834-7065


[Federal Register: August 20, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 160)]
[Notices]
[Page 42139-42140]
[DOCID:fr20au09-95]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60488; File No. SR-CBOE-2009-037]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto, To Amend Its Minor Rule Violation Plan

August 12, 2009.
    On June 4, 2009, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``CBOE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change amending CBOE Rule 17.50 (Minor
Rule Plan) (``MRP'') to incorporate additional violations into the MRP,
increase the sanctions for certain violations, to make other minor
changes, and to make changes to the trading and decorum violations. On
June 17, 2009, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change to make non-substantive, technical edits to the rule text
submitted as Exhibit 5 to SR-CBOE-2009-037. On June 23, 2009, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change making
corrections to the description of the changes submitted in Amendment
No. 1. The proposed rule change, as amended, was published for comment
in the Federal Register on July 6, 2009.\3\ The Commission received no
comments on the proposal. This order approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60177 (June 25, 2009),
74 FR 32015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has proposed to make additional rules subject to
punishment under its the MRP. These rules relate to: (1) Exercise
limits (Rule 4.12); (2) trading in restricted classes (Rule 5.4); (3)
linkage violations (Rules 6.83 and 6.84); (4) market maker quoting
obligations (Rules 8.7, 8.15A, 8.85, and 8.93); (5) failure to
accurately report position and account information (Rule 4.13); (6)
failure to designate a person or persons responsible for implementing
and monitoring a member's anti-money laundering compliance program
(Rule

4.20); (7) failure to provide prior capital withdrawal notice (Rule
15c3-1(e) under the Act); and (8) failure to provide post capital
withdrawal notice (Rule 15c3-1(e) under the Act). The Exchange believes
that it will be able to carry out its regulatory responsibility more
quickly and efficiently by incorporating these violations into its MRP.
    The Exchange has also proposed to increase the fine levels for
certain violations.\4\ The Exchange believes that the current fine
levels for such violations are too low, given the serious nature of
such offenses, and that the proposed increases are necessary to be an
effective deterrent against future violations and a just penalty for
such violations. Furthermore, the Exchange has proposed to extend the
surveillance period for many of the violations to a 24-month rolling
period from a 12-month period.\5\ The Exchange believes that increasing
the surveillance period will serve as an effective deterrent to future
violative conduct. The Exchange also proposed a few other technical
corrections to its MRP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The proposed increased fines would apply to the following
violations: (1) Failure to respond in a timely manner to a request
for automated submission of trade data (``Blue Sheets'') (Rule
15.7); (2) failure of a floor broker or market maker to honor the
firm quote requirements (Rule 8.51), to honor the priority of
marketable customer orders maintained in the Customer Limit Order
Book (Rule 6.45), and to use due diligence in the execution of
orders for which the floor member maintains an agency obligation
(Rule 6.73); and (3) violations of exercise and exercise advice
rules for American-style, cash-settled index options (Rule 11.1,
Interpretation and Policy .03).
    \5\ The violations that will have a 24-month rolling period are:
(1) Violation of exercise and position limits (Rule 4.11 and 4.12);
(2) failure to respond in a timely manner to a request for automated
submission of trade data (``Blue Sheets'') (Rule 15.7); (3) failure
of a floor broker or market maker to honor the firm quote
requirements (Rule 8.51), to honor the priority of marketable
customer orders maintained in the Customer Limit Order Book (Rule
6.45), and to use due diligence in the execution of orders for which
the floor member maintains an agency obligation (Rule 6.73); (4)
failure to submit trade data on trade date (Rule 6.51); (5)
violations of exercise and exercise advice rules for American-style,
cash-settled index options (Rule 11.1, Interpretation and Policy
.03); (6) communications to the Exchange or the clearing corporation
(Rule 4.22); (7) trading in restricted classes (Rule 5.4); (8)
linkage violations (Rules 6.83 and 6.84); (9) failure to meet
Exchange quoting obligations (Rules 8.7, 8.15A, 8.85, and 8.93);
(10) failure to accurately report position and account information
(Rule 4.13); (11) failure to provide prior capital withdrawal notice
(Rule 15c3-1(e) under the Act); (12) failure to provide post capital
withdrawal notice (Rule 15c3-1(e) under the Act); and (13) failure
to designate a person or persons responsible for implementing and
monitoring a member's anti-money laundering compliance program (Rule
4.20).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposed to establish a rolling 24-month look-back
period for all of their trading and decorum violation offenses. In
addition, the Exchange proposed to establish fixed fine levels for
Class A and Class B Offenses.\6\ For Class A Offenses, CBOE will now
assess a fine of $1,000 for the first violation, $2,500 for the second
violation, and $5,000 for the third violation. The Exchange is also
proposing to delete the reference to ``Subsequent Offenses'' for Class
A Offenses.\7\ For Class B Offenses, CBOE is proposing to assess a fine
of $250 for the first offense, $500 for the second offense, $1,000 for
the third offense, and $2,500 for any subsequent offenses.\8\ The
Exchange proposes to change the classification of a market maker
failing to respond to a request for a market by an Order Book Official
or a PAR Official from a Class B Offense to a Class A Offense due to
the nature of this violation. The Exchange is also proposing to remove
obsolete or duplicative violations from the list of Class A and Class B
Offenses.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Class A Offenses are considered more serious than Class B
Offenses and therefore carry a heavier penalty. Class A Offenses
include unbusinesslike conduct, harassment, and property damage.
Class B Offenses include abusive language, dress code violations,
and failure to display I.D.
    \7\ The previous fine levels for Class A Offenses were: $500 to
$1,500 for the first violation, $1,000 to $3,000 for the second
violation, $2,000 to $5,000 for the third violation, and $3,500 to
$5,000 for subsequent offenses.
    \8\ The previous fine levels for Class B Offenses were: $100 to
$500 for the first offense, $500 to $1,000 for the second offense,
$1,000 for the third offense, and $2,500 for subsequent offenses.
    \9\ The Exchange is proposing to remove ten Class A and Class B
Violations. They are: (i) Quote width violations; (ii) violations of
Rule 8.51 (Firm Quote); (iii) enabling/assisting a suspended member
or associated person to gain improper access to the floor; (iv)
gaining/enabling improper access to the floor; (v) effecting or
attempting to effect a transaction with no public outcry; (vi)
improper use of the runners' aisle; (vii) trading in the aisle;
(viii) impermissible use of member phones; (ix) returning late or
failing to return a visitor badge; and (x) DPM failure to activate
or deactivate RAES.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities exchange.\10\ In particular, the
Commission believes that the proposal is consistent with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\11\ which requires that the rules of an exchange be
designed to, among other things, protect investors and the public
interest. The Commission also believes that the proposal is consistent
with Sections 6(b)(1) and 6(b)(6) of the Act,\12\ which require that
the rules of an exchange enforce compliance with, and provide
appropriate discipline for, violations of Commission and Exchange
rules. Furthermore, the Commission believes that the proposed changes
to the MRP should strengthen the Exchange's ability to carry out its
oversight and enforcement responsibilities as a self-regulatory
organization in cases where full disciplinary proceedings are
unsuitable in view of the minor nature of the particular violation.
Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with
the public interest, the protection of investors, or otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as required by Rule 19d-1(c)(2)
under the Act,\13\ which governs minor rule violation plans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission
notes that it has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1) and 78f(b)(6).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19d-1(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission in no way
minimizes the importance of compliance with CBOE rules and all other
rules subject to the imposition of fines under the MRP. The Commission
believes that the violation of any self-regulatory organization's
rules, as well as Commission rules, is a serious matter. However, the
MRP provides a reasonable means of addressing rule violations that do
not rise to the level of requiring formal disciplinary proceedings,
while providing greater flexibility in handling certain violations. The
Commission expects that CBOE will continue to conduct surveillance with
due diligence and make a determination based on its findings, on a
case-by-case basis, whether a fine of more or less than the recommended
amount is appropriate for a violation under the MRP or whether a
violation requires formal disciplinary action under CBOE Rules 17.1-
17.14.
    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act
\14\ and Rule 19d-1(c)(2) under the Act,\15\ that the proposed rule
change (SR-CBOE-2009-037), as amended, be, and hereby is, approved and
declared effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19d-1(c)(2).
    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12); 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(44).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-19892 Filed 8-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 21, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22986-22987]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10525]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Proposed
Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0352; Product Identifier 2019-NE-09-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; GE Honda Aero Engines Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all GE Honda Aero Engines (GHAE) HF120 turbofan engines with a
certain fuel pump metering unit (FPMU) assembly. This proposed AD was
prompted by damage found on the permanent magnetic alternator (PMA)
drive gear within the FPMU assembly. This proposed AD would require
removal of a certain FPMU assembly and its replacement with a part
eligible for installation. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 5,
2019.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact GE Honda
Aero Engines, LLC, 9050 Centre Pointe Drive, Suite 200, West Chester,
exception occurred on : 2019-10525.htm
exception occurred on : 2019-10525.htm
OH 45069; phone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: aero.com">[email protected]aero.com; internet:
www.gehonda.com. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0352; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is listed above. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Richardson-Bach, Aerospace
Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2019-0352;
Product Identifier 2019-NE-09-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
The FAA specifically invites comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. The FAA will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
NPRM because of those comments.
    The FAA will post all comments received, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide.
The FAA will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.

Discussion

    The FAA was notified of an incident on a flight test engine that
resulted in the loss of over speed protection warning. GHAE's
subsequent investigation found damage on the PMA drive gear teeth
within the FPMU assembly, which was likely due to dynamic loads on the
drive gear that exceeded the material capability. This condition, if
not addressed, could result in failure of one or more engines, loss of
thrust control, and loss of the airplane.

Related Service Information

    The FAA reviewed GHAE HF120 Service Bulletin (SB) 73-0016 R01,
dated November 8, 2018. The SB describes procedures for replacement of
the FPMU assembly.

FAA's Determination

    The FAA is proposing this AD because it evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require removal of a certain FPMU assembly
and its replacement with a part eligible for installation.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 161 engines
installed on airplanes of U.S. registry.
    The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replace the FPMU......................  6.5 work-hours x $85 per         $50,000      $50,552.50   $8,138,952.50
                                         hour = $552.50.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to engines, propellers, and
associated appliances to the Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

GE Honda Aero Engines: Docket No. FAA-2019-0352; Product Identifier
2019-NE-09-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments by July 5, 2019.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all GE Honda Aero Engines (GHAE) HF120
turbofan engines with fuel pump metering unit (FPMU) assembly, part
number (P/N) 24100-Q0A-F000, installed.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7314, Engine Fuel
Pump.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by damage found on the permanent magnetic
alternator (PMA) drive gear within the FPMU assembly. The FAA is
issuing this AD to prevent failure of the FPMU assembly. The unsafe
condition, if not addressed, could result in failure of one or more
engines, loss of thrust control, and loss of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    Within 20 engine hours after the effective date of this AD, or
before accumulating 600 engine hours time since new, whichever
occurs later, remove the affected FPMU assembly and replace it with
a part eligible for installation.

(h) Installation Prohibition

    After the effective date of this AD, do not install on any
engine a FPMU assembly, P/N 24100-Q0A-F000.

(i) Definition

    For the purposes of this AD, a ``part eligible for
installation'' is:
    (1) A FPMU assembly, P/N 24100-Q0A-G000 or P/N 24100-Q0A-F100;
or
    (2) a FPMU assembly, P/N 24100-Q0A-F000, that is rebuilt and
marked as P/N 24100-Q0A-G000 or P/N 24100-Q0A-F100.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. You may email your
request to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(k) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Michael
Richardson-Bach, Aerospace Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 781-238-
7199; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact GE
Honda Aero Engines, LLC, 9050 Centre Pointe Drive, Suite 200, West
exception occurred on : 2019-10525.htm
exception occurred on : 2019-10525.htm
Chester, OH 45069; phone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: aero.com">[email protected]aero.com;
internet: www.gehonda.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on May 15, 2019.
Robert J. Ganley,
Manager, Engine & Propeller Standards Branch, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-10525 Filed 5-20-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D. C., 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES PC Code: 109901 DP Barcodes: D297517, D283708, D279915, D279913, D264522, D238995, D239847 Date: August 30, 2005 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Ecological Risk Assessment in Support of the Reregistration Eligibility Decision on Triadimefon TO: John Pates, Chemical Review Manager Special Review and Reregistration Division FROM: Michelle Embry, Ph. D., Biologist Jonathan Angier, Ph. D., Environmental Scientist Environmental Risk Branch II Environmental Fate and Effects Division ( 7507C)

THROUGH: Dana Spatz, Risk Assessment Process Leader APPROVED BY: Tom Bailey, Ph. D., Branch Chief Environmental Risk Branch II Environmental Fate and Effects Division The Environmental Fate and Effects Division ( EFED) has completed its ecological risk assessment of triadimefon in support of the reregistration eligibility decision. This is a Level 1 national scale ecological risk assessment. The purpose of this assessment was to determine whether current label uses of triadimefon provide a means of exposure that could potentially result in adverse ecological effects ( risk) to threatened/ endangered and non endangered animals and plants. Assessment endpoints include survival, reproduction and growth of terrestrial and aquatic animals and plants. Conclusions from this screening level ecological risk assessment are in the Executive Summary of the document. This assessment indicates some risks to aquatic plants, freshwater fish and invertebrates, birds, and mammals associated with use of triadimefon.  2

The results of this screening level risk assessment suggest the potential for direct adverse chronic effects to birds and mammals at all application rates, scenarios, number of applications, and application intervals. Simulations indicate that to reduce risk below the chronic risk levels of concern for birds and mammals, the application rate for a single application would have to be as low as 0.08 lb ai/ A and 0.025 lbs a. i./ A for birds and mammals, respectively. It should be noted that the endangered species assessment is preliminary and incomplete, due to the formation of the degradate 1,2,4 triazole, which is currently being addressed in a separate risk assessment by the Agency, as well as the following data gaps.

Major data gaps include: ° § 123 2: Aquatic vascular plant growth ( triadimefon and triadimenol) ° § 72 3a: Estuarine/ Marine Fish LC 50 ( triadimefon and triadimenol) ° § 72 3b: Estuarine/ Marine Mollusk EC 50 ( triadimefon and triadimenol) ° § 72 3c: Estuarine/ Marine Shrimp EC 50 ( triadimefon and triadimenol) ° § 123 1a: Seedling Emergence ( triadimefon and triadimenol) ° § 123 1b: Vegetative Vigor ( triadimefon and triadimenol)

° Information regarding the formation of the degradate triadimenol ( rate, conditions, and pathways of formation)


P-20-0074 Sanitized Support Documents Index:
 P-20-0074 Sanitized Determination Document (linked)
 P-20-0074 Sanitized CHEM Report (attached)
 P-20-0074 Sanitized ECO Report (attached)
 P-20-0074 Sanitized ENG Report (attached)
 P-20-0074 Sanitized EXP Report (attached)
 P-20-0074 Sanitized Fate Report (attached)
 P-20-0074 Sanitized HLTH Report_POST-FOCUS FINAL (attached)