[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 10846]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04991]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Number: PR18-35-000.
    Applicants: Enable Oklahoma Intrastate Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)+(g): Enable Revised
Fuel Percentages April 1, 2018 through March 31, 2019 to be effective
4/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 2/28/18.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>14.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/21/18.

    284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/30/18.

    Docket Number: PR18-36-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)/: COH SOC Rate Change
Effective 3-1-2018.
    Filed Date: 3/5/18.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>10.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/26/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-481-000.
    Applicants: Pivotal Utility Holdings, Inc., Elkton Acquisition
Corp.
    Description: Joint Petition for Temporary Waiver of Commission
Capacity Release Regulations and Policies, et al.
    Filed Date: 2/27/18.
    Accession Number: 20180227-5193.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-482-000.
    Applicants: Pivotal Utility Holdings, Inc., ETG Acquisition Corp.
    Description: Joint Petition for Temporary Waiver of Commission
Capacity Release Regulations and Policies, et al.
    Filed Date: 2/27/18.
    Accession Number: 20180227-5194.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-550-000.
    Applicants: Noble Energy, Inc., Fieldwood Energy LLC.
    Description: Joint Petition for Temporary Waiver of Commission
Policies, Capacity Release Regulations and Related Tariff Provisions.
    Filed Date: 3/5/18.
    Accession Number: 20180305-5380.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-417-001.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Compliance Filing to RP18-417-000 to
be effective 3/5/2018.
    Filed Date: 3/6/18.
    Accession Number: 20180306-5150.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/19/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-551-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement--
Tenaska Marketing Ventures to be effective 4/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 3/6/18.
    Accession Number: 20180306-5046.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/19/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-552-000.
    Applicants: Alliance Pipeline L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Contracts
April--October 2018 to be effective 4/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 3/6/18.
    Accession Number: 20180306-5074.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/19/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-553-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Cove Point LNG, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: DECP--Liquefaction Project
Implementation (RP18-419) Update to be effective 4/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 3/6/18.
    Accession Number: 20180306-5143.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/19/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and Sec.  385.214) on or
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 7, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-04991 Filed 3-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48193-48196]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19742]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-67609; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2012-35]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Implementing Amendments
to the NYSE MKT LLC Price List To Establish Pricing for the Retail
Liquidity Program

August 7, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on July 31, 2012, NYSE MKT LLC (``NYSE MKT'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes implementing amendments to the NYSE MKT LLC
Price List to Establish Pricing for the Retail Liquidity Program. The
text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, on the
Commission's Web site at www.sec.gov, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries,

set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts
of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to establish pricing
for the Retail Liquidity Program, which has been approved by the
Commission to operate for one year as a pilot program.\3\ The Exchange
proposes to implement the fee changes on August 1, 2012. The Retail
Liquidity Program is designed to attract additional retail order flow
to the Exchange for NYSE MKT Equities-traded securities \4\ while also
providing the potential for price improvement to such order flow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67347 (July 3,
2012), 77 FR 40673 (July 10, 2012) (SR-NYSEAmex-2011-84).
    \4\ ``NYSE MKT Equities-traded securities'' refers to all
securities available to be traded on the Exchange, including, but
not limited to, NYSE MKT-listed securities as well as those listed
on the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'') traded pursuant to
unlisted trading privileges. See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 62479 (July 9, 2010), 75 FR 41264 (July 15, 2010) (SR-
NYSEAmex-2010-31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Two new classes of market participants were created under the
Retail Liquidity Program: (1) Retail Member Organizations
(``RMOs''),\5\ which are eligible to submit certain retail order flow
(``Retail Orders'') \6\ to the Exchange, and (2) Retail Liquidity
Providers (``RLPs''),\7\ which are required to provide potential price
improvement for Retail Orders in the form of non-displayed interest
(``Retail Price Improvement Orders'' or ``RPIs'') \8\ that is better
than the best protected bid (``PBB'') or the best protected offer
(``PBO'') (together, the ``PBBO'').\9\ Member organizations other than
RLPs are also permitted, but not required, to submit RPIs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ ``RMO'' is defined in Rule 107C(a)(2)--Equities as a member
organization (or a division thereof) that has been approved by the
Exchange to submit Retail Orders.
    \6\ ``Retail Order'' is defined in Rule 107C(a)(3)--Equities as
an agency order that originates from a natural person and is
submitted to the Exchange by an RMO, provided that no change is made
to the terms of the order with respect to price or side of market
and the order does not originate from a trading algorithm or any
other computerized methodology. A Retail Order is an Immediate or
Cancel Order and must operate in accordance with Rule 107C(k)--
Equities. A Retail Order may be an odd lot, round lot or a partial
round lot (``PRL'').
    \7\ ``RLP'' is defined in Rule 107C(a)(1)--Equities as a member
organization that is approved by the Exchange to act as such and
that is required to submit Retail Price Improvement in accordance
with Rule 107C--Equities.
    \8\ ``RPI'' is defined in Rule 107C(a)(4)--Equities and consists
of non-displayed interest in NYSE MKT Equities-traded securities
that is priced better than the PBB or PBO, as such terms are defined
in Regulation NMS Rule 600(b)(57), by at least $0.001 and that is
identified as such. Exchange systems will monitor whether RPI buy or
sell interest, adjusted by any offset and subject to the ceiling or
floor price, is eligible to interact with incoming Retail Orders. An
RPI remains non-displayed in its entirety (the buy or sell interest,
the offset, and the ceiling or floor). An RLP may only enter an RPI
for securities to which it is assigned as RLP. An RPI may be an odd
lot, round lot or a PRL.
    \9\ The terms ``protected bid'' and ``protected offer'' have the
same meaning as defined in Regulation NMS Rule 600(b)(57). The PBB
is the best-priced protected bid and the PBO is the best-priced
protected offer. Generally, the PBB and PBO and the national best
bid (``NBB'') and national best offer (``NBO''), respectively, will
be the same. However, a market center is not required to route to
the NBB or NBO if that market center is subject to an exception
under Regulation NMS Rule 611(b)(1) or if such NBB or NBO is
otherwise not available for an automatic execution. In such case,
the PBB or PBO would be the best-priced protected bid or offer to
which a market center must route interest pursuant to Regulation NMS
Rule 611.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In proposing the Retail Liquidity Program, the Exchange stated that
it would submit a separate proposal to amend its Price List in
connection with the Retail Liquidity Program.\10\ Accordingly, the
Exchange proposes to adopt the following pricing: \11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65671 (November 2,
2011), 76 FR 69774 (November 9, 2011) (SR-NYSEAmex-2011-84).
    \11\ The Exchange notes that participation in the Retail
Liquidity Program is optional and, accordingly, the pricing proposed
herein would not apply to a member organization that does not choose
to participate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     RPIs of RLPs will be free if executed against Retail
Orders. The Exchange notes that, as provided under Rule 107C(f)(3)--
Equities, the percentage requirement provided under Rule 107C(f)(1)--
Equities is not applicable in the first two calendar months that a
member organization operates as an RLP. Instead, the percentage
requirement takes effect on the first day of the third consecutive
calendar month that the member organization operates as an RLP. The
Exchange proposes that, during the first two calendar months that a
member organization operates as an RLP, the RLP's RPIs will be free if
executed against Retail Orders, regardless of the percentage of the
trading day at which the RLP maintains an RPI that is priced better
than the PBBO. Thereafter, this proposed rate would only be applicable
if the RLP satisfies the percentage requirement of Rule 107C(f)(1)--
Equities. An RLP that does not satisfy the percentage requirement of
Rule 107C(f)(1)--Equities would be charged the $0.0003 per share rate
described below for non-RLP member organizations.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The Exchange notes that the RPI executions of a member
organization disqualified from acting as an RLP would thereafter be
subject to the transaction pricing applicable to non-RLP member
organizations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     RPIs of non-RLP member organizations will be charged
$0.0003 per share if executed against Retail Orders; provided, however,
that RPIs of non-RLP member organizations that execute an average daily
volume (``ADV'') \13\ during the month of at least 10,000 shares of
RPIs will be free if executed against Retail Orders.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ ADV calculations exclude early closing days.
    \14\ The proposed 10,000 share threshold would include
executions of all NYSE MKT Equities-traded securities, including,
but not limited to, executions of NYSE MKT-listed securities as well
as those listed on NASDAQ traded pursuant to unlisted trading
privileges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Retail Orders of RMOs will receive a credit of $0.0005 per
share if executed against RPIs of RLPs and other member organizations.
The Exchange notes that an RMO submitting a Retail Order could choose
one of three ways for the Retail Order to interact with available
contra-side interest. First, a Type 1-designated Retail Order could
interact only with available contra-side RPIs. These Type 1-designated
Retail Orders would not interact with other available contra-side
interest in Exchange systems or route to other markets. Portions of a
Type 1-designated Retail Order that are not executed would be
cancelled. Second, a Type 2-designated Retail Order could interact
first with available contra-side RPIs and any remaining portion would
be executed as a non-routable Regulation NMS-compliant Immediate or
Cancel Order, which would sweep the Exchange's Book without being
routed to other markets, and any remaining portion would be cancelled.
Finally, a Type 3-designated Retail Order could interact first with
available contra-side RPIs and any remaining portion would be executed
as a routable Exchange Immediate or Cancel Order, which would sweep the
Exchange's Book and be routed to other markets, and any remaining
portion would be cancelled. A Retail Order that executes against the
Book will be charged according to the standard rate applicable to non-
Retail Orders, which is currently $0.0028 per share (or $0.0030 for
NASDAQ securities traded pursuant to unlisted trading privileges).
Also, the standard routing fee (i.e., $0.0030 per share) would apply to
a Retail Order that is routed away from the Exchange and executed on
another market.
    The Exchange proposes that the pricing described herein be
applicable, unless otherwise amended at a later date, for so long as
the Retail Liquidity Program is in effect. Because the Retail Liquidity
Program has been approved to

operate as a one-year pilot program, the Exchange anticipates that it
will periodically review this pricing to seek to ensure that it
contributes to the goal of the Retail Liquidity Program, which is
designed to attract additional retail order flow to the Exchange for
NYSE MKT Equities-traded securities while also providing the potential
for price improvement to such order flow.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
``Act''),\15\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,\16\ in particular, because it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among
its members and issuers and other persons using its facilities and does
not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers or
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it would establish
pricing designed to increase competition among execution venues,
encourage additional liquidity and offer the potential for price
improvement to retail investors. The Exchange notes that a significant
percentage of the orders of individual investors are executed over-the-
counter.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Concept Release on Equity Market Structure, Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 61358 (January 14, 2010), 75 FR 3594
(January 21, 2010) (noting that dark pools and internalizing broker-
dealers executed approximately 25.4% of share volume in September
2009). See also Mary L. Schapiro, Strengthening Our Equity Market
Structure (Speech at the Economic Club of New York, Sept. 7, 2010)
(available on the Commission's Web site). In her speech, Chairman
Schapiro noted that nearly 30 percent of volume in U.S.-listed
equities was executed in venues that do not display their liquidity
or make it generally available to the public and the percentage was
increasing nearly every month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the $0.0005 credit proposed herein for
executions of RMOs against RPIs is reasonable, equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because it will create a financial incentive to
bring additional retail order flow to a public market. The Exchange
also believes applying standard non-Retail Order rates to Retail Orders
that execute against the Book or that are routed away from the Exchange
and executed on another market is reasonable, equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because these are the rates that would apply to
such orders, but for the Retail Order designation.
    The Exchange believes that not charging RLPs that satisfy the
percentage requirement of Rule 107C(f)(1)--Equities for their
executions of RPIs is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it will incentivize member organizations to
become RLPs and therefore could result in greater price improvement for
Retail Orders. Similarly, the Exchange believes that not charging non-
RLP member organizations that execute an ADV of at least 10,000 shares
of RPIs during the month for their executions of RPIs is reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it will incentivize
such non-RLPs to submit RPIs for interaction with Retail Orders.\18\
Conversely, the Exchange believes that charging RLPs and non-RLP member
organizations that do not satisfy the percentage requirements of Rule
107C(f)(1)--Equities and the 10,000-share ADV threshold, respectively,
is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it
will incentivize RLPs and non-RLPs to submit RPIs and, therefore,
contribute to robust amounts of RPI liquidity being available for
interaction with the Retail Orders submitted by RMOs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ The Exchange believes that the 10,000-share ADV threshold
is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it
is set at a level that, based on existing volume on the Exchange,
the Exchange believes non-RLP member organizations would be
reasonably able to satisfy. In this regard, the Exchange anticipates
that it will assess non-RLP member organization RPI volume over
time, and, to the extent the Exchange considers it reasonable and
appropriate, may propose to modify the ADV threshold from the level
proposed herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that it is reasonable, equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory to not charge an RLP for its executions of RPIs
against a Retail Order during the first two calendar months of
operation as an RLP, but to charge a non-RLP member organization for
such executions unless it satisfies the 10,000-share ADV threshold.
Specifically, while the Exchange believes that member organizations
that elect to become RLPs will promptly endeavor to satisfy the
applicable percentage requirement provided under Rule 107C(f)(1)--
Equities, the Exchange anticipates that RLPs will require a reasonable
period of time to adjust their systems and trading to the Retail
Liquidity Program. In this regard, the Exchange notes that non-RLP
member organizations will not need to make such adjustments, as they
are not subject to the percentage requirements of Rule 107C(f)--
Equities. Also, whereas an RLP may only enter an RPI for securities to
which it is assigned, non-RLP member organizations may submit RPIs in
all NYSE MKT Equities-traded securities. Accordingly, while non-RLP
member organization executions of RPIs for all NYSE MKT Equities-traded
securities would count toward satisfying the 10,000-share ADV
threshold, only RLP executions of RPIs in assigned securities would
count toward satisfying the percentage requirements of Rule
107C(f)(1)--Equities.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ The Exchange notes that not charging RLPs during the first
two calendar months of operation as an RLP is similar to the
treatment of Supplemental Liquidity Providers during their first
month of operating in such capacity. See Rule 107B--Equities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While the Exchange believes that markets and price discovery
optimally function through the interactions of diverse flow types, it
also believes that growth in internalization has required
differentiation of retail order flow from other order flow types. The
pricing proposed herein, like the Retail Liquidity Program itself, is
not designed to permit unfair discrimination, but instead to promote a
competitive process around retail executions such that retail investors
would receive better prices than they currently do through bilateral
internalization arrangements. The Exchange believes that the
transparency and competitiveness of operating a program such as the
Retail Liquidity Program on an exchange market, and the pricing related
thereto, would result in better prices for retail investors.
Additionally, the Exchange notes that participation in the Retail
Liquidity Program is optional and, accordingly, the pricing proposed
herein would not apply to a member organization that does not choose to
participate.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \20\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \21\

thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge imposed
by NYSE MKT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \21\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2012-35 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2012-35. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make publicly available. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2012-35 and should
be submitted on or before September 4, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-19742 Filed 8-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 217 (Monday, November 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63047-63048]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24734]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4614-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

New Jersey; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of New Jersey (FEMA-4614-DR), dated September 5, 2021,
and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued October 7, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of New Jersey is hereby amended to include the following
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration
of September 5, 2021.

    Cape May County for Public Assistance.
    Atlantic, Burlington, Camden, Cumberland, Monmouth, Ocean,
Salem, Sussex and Warren Counties for emergency protective measures
(Category B), limited to direct Federal assistance and reimbursement
for mass care including evacuation and shelter support.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used

for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans;
97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster
Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA);
97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing
Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared
Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and
Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to
Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-24734 Filed 11-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: September 17, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 179)]
[Notices]
[Page 47810]
[DOCID:fr17se09-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2009-0434]

Lower Mississippi River Waterway Safety Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Lower Mississippi River Waterway Safety Advisory Committee
will meet in New Orleans to discuss various issues relating to
navigational safety on the Lower Mississippi River and related
waterways. This meeting will be open to the public.

DATES: The Committee will meet on Wednesday, October 7, 2009 from 9
a.m. to noon. This meeting may close early if all business is finished.
Written material and requests to make oral presentations should reach
the Coast Guard on or before September 23, 2009. Requests to have a
copy of your material distributed to each member of the committee
should reach the Coast Guard on or before September 23, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The Committee will meet at the New Orleans Yacht Club, 403
North Roadway, West End, New Orleans, LA 70124. Send written material
and requests to make oral presentations to Commander, Coast Guard
Sector New Orleans, Designated Federal Officer (DFO) of Lower
Mississippi River Waterway Safety Advisory Committee, Attn: Waterways
Management, 1615 Poydras St., New Orleans, LA 70112. This notice, and
documents identified in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section as being
available in the docket may be viewed in our online docket, USCG-2009-
0434, at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief Warrant Officer David Chapman,
Assistant to DFO of Lower Mississippi River Waterway Safety Advisory
Committee, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is given under the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (Pub. L. 92-463).

Agenda of Meeting

    The agenda for the October 7, 2009 Committee meeting is as follows:

    (1) Introduction of committee members.
    (2) Opening Remarks.
    (3) Approval of the June 2, 2009 minutes.
    (4) Old Business.
    (a) Captain of the Port status report.
    (b) VTS update report.
    (c) Subcommittee/Working Groups update reports.
    (5) New Business.
    (6) Adjournment.

Procedural

    This meeting is open to the public. Please note that the meeting
may close early if all business is finished. At the Chair's discretion,
members of the public may make oral presentations during the meeting.
If you would like to make an oral presentation at a meeting, please
notify the DFO no later than September 23, 2009. Written material for
distribution at a meeting should reach the Coast Guard no later than
September 23, 2009. If you would like a copy of your material
distributed to each member of the committee in advance of a meeting,
please submit 25 copies to the DFO no later than September 23, 2009.

Information on Services for Individuals With Disabilities

    For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the meeting, contact
the DFO as soon as possible.

    Dated: August 26, 2009.
Mary E. Landry,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, 8th Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E9-22358 Filed 9-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 76 (Thursday, April 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 24451]
[FR Doc No: 2023-08314]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2022-0011]

Maritime Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety and Health
(MACOSH)

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice of MACOSH membership.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 7, 2023, the Secretary appointed 15 members and a
Special Agency Liaison to serve on the Maritime Advisory Committee on
Occupational Safety and Health (MACOSH) for a two-year term from April
13, 2023-April 13, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    For press inquiries: Mr. Frank Meilinger, Director, OSHA Office of
Communications, U.S. Department of Labor; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email: [email protected].
    For general information about MACOSH: Ms. Amy Wangdahl, Director,
Office of Maritime and Agriculture, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    MACOSH is established and operates in accordance with section 7(d)
of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act) (29 U.S.C.
656); 29 CFR part 1912; and Secretary of Labor's Order 8-2020 (85 FR
58393, September 18, 2020). In addition, MACOSH is established and
operates in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA),
(5 U.S.C. 10), its implementing regulations (41 CFR parts 101-6 and
102-3), and Department of Labor Manual Chapter 1-900 (August 31, 2020).
The Committee advises OSHA on matters relevant to the safety and health
of employees in the maritime industry. This includes advice on maritime
issues that will result in more effective enforcement, training, and
outreach programs, and streamlined regulatory efforts. The maritime
industry includes shipyard employment, longshoring, marine terminal,
and commercial fishing industries. The Committee functions solely as an
advisory body in compliance with the provisions of the FACA and OSHA's
regulations covering advisory committees (29 CFR part 1912).
    The maritime industry has historically experienced a high incidence
of work-related fatalities, injuries, and illnesses. OSHA has targeted
this industry for special attention due to that experience. This
targeting includes development of guidance or outreach materials
specific to the industry, rulemakings to update requirements, and other
activities. MACOSH advises the Secretary through the Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health on matters
relevant to the safety and health of employees in the maritime
industry. The Committee's advice will result in more effective
enforcement, training and outreach programs, and streamlined regulatory
efforts.

II. Appointment of Committee Members

    OSHA received nominations of highly qualified individuals in
response to the agency's request for nominations (87 FR 71686, November
23, 2022). The Secretary appointed to serve on the Committee
individuals who have broad experience relevant to the issues to be
examined by the Committee. The Committee is diverse and balanced, both
in terms of segments of the maritime industry represented (e.g.,
shipyard employment, longshoring, marine terminal, and commercial
fishing industries), and in the views and interests represented by the
members. The MACOSH membership is as follows:

Government Interests

 John Goering, U.S. Department of Transportation, Maritime
Administration
 James Rone, Washington State Department of Labor and
Industries
 Alice Shumate, National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health
 David Ward, U.S. Coast Guard

Worker Interests

 Aaron Arabaski, Noble Drilling
 Robert Fiore, International Longshoremen's Association
 Michael Oathout, International Association of Machinists and
Aerospace Workers
 Adam Wetzell, International Longshore and Warehouse Union

Employer Interests

 Solomon Egbe, National Maritime Safety Association
 Amy Liu, Sound Testing, Inc.
 John Ratcliffe, Virginia International Terminals, LLC
 David Turner, Yusen Terminals, LLC

Professional Organization Interests

 Thresa Nelson, American Industrial Hygiene Association
 Donald V. Raffo, Marine Chemist Association
 Lawrence Russell, National Fire Protection Association

    The Special Agency Liaison to MACOSH is:

 Christopher Godfrey, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs,
U.S. Department of Labor

Authority and Signature

    James S. Frederick, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, authorized the preparation of this
notice pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 655 and 656(d), Secretary's Order 8-2020
(85 FR 58393), 5 U.S.C. 10, and 29 CFR part 1912.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on April 12, 2023.
James S. Frederick,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2023-08314 Filed 4-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10520-10522]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3930]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0848; FRL-9336-1]

Notice of Intent To Suspend Certain Pesticide Registrations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 6(f)(2) of the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), EPA is printing this Notice of
Intent to Suspend Drexel Basic Copper Sulfate Technical. This notice is
issued by EPA pursuant to section 3(c)(2)(B) of FIFRA. The Notice of
Intent to Suspend was issued following the Agency's issuance of a Data
Call-In Notice (DCI), which required the registrant of the affected
pesticide product containing the pesticide active ingredient, Copper
Compounds, to take appropriate steps to secure certain data, and
following the registrant's failure to submit these data or to take
other appropriate steps to secure the required data. The subject data
were determined to be required to maintain in effect the existing
registration of the affected product. Failure to comply with the data
requirements of a DCI is a basis for suspension of the affected
registration under section 3(c)(2)(B) of FIFRA.

DATES: The Notice of Intent To Suspend included in this Federal
Register notice will become a final and effective suspension order
automatically by operation of law 30 days after the date of the
registrant's receipt of the mailed Notice of Intent To Suspend or on
March 23, 2012 if the mailed Notice of Intent To Suspend is returned to
the Administrator as undeliverable, if delivery is refused, or if the
Administrator otherwise is unable to accomplish delivery to the
registrant after making reasonable efforts to do so, unless during that
time a timely and adequate request for a hearing is made by a person
adversely affected by the Notice of Intent to Suspend or the registrant
has satisfied the Administrator that the registrant has complied fully
with the requirements that served as a basis for the Notice of Intent
to Suspend. Unit IV explains what must be done to avoid suspension
under this notice (i.e., how to request a hearing or how to comply
fully with the requirements that served as a basis for the Notice of
Intent to Suspend).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Veronica Dutch, Pesticide Re-
evaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farm worker and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0848. Publicly available
docket materials are available either in the electronic docket at
http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the
Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington,
VA. The hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

II. Registrant Issued Notice of Intent To Suspend Active Ingredient,
Product Affected, and Date Issued

    The Notice of Intent to Suspend was sent via the U.S. Postal
Service (USPS), return receipt requested, to the registrant for the
product listed in Table 1 of this unit.

                                            Table 1--List of Products
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         EPA
      Registrant affected       Active ingredient   Registration      Product name     Date EPA issued notice of
                                                         No.                               intent to suspend
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Drexel Chemical Company.......  Copper Compounds.        19713-72  Drexel Basic       February 8, 2012.
                                                                    Copper Sulfate
                                                                    Technical.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Basis for Issuance of Notice of Intent To Suspend; Requirement
List

    The registrant failed to submit the required data or information or
to take other appropriate steps to secure the required data listed in
Table 2 of this unit.

                                          Table 2--List of Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Guideline
                      No. as                                             Date                       Reason for
EPA  Registration    listed in     Requirement name      Date EPA     registrant    Final data      notice of
       No.          applicable                          issued DCI   received DCI    due date       intent to
                        DCI                                                                          suspend
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19713-72.........      830.1550  Product identity and    12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  composition.                                                    received.
19713-72.........      830.1600  Description of          12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  materials used to                                               received.
                                  produce the product.
19713-72.........      830.1620  Description of          12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  production process.                                             received.
19713-72.........      830.1650  Description of          12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  formulation process.                                            received.
19713-72.........      830.1670  Discussion of           12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  formation of                                                    received.
                                  impurities.
19713-72.........      830.1700  Preliminary analysis    12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                                                                received.

19713-72.........      830.1750  Certified limits....    12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                                                                received.
19713-72.........      830.1800  Enforcement             12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  analytical method.                                              received.
19713-72.........      830.6302  Color...............    12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                                                                received.
19713-72.........      830.6303  Physical state......    12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                                                                received.
19713-72.........      830.6304  Odor................    12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                                                                received.
19713-72.........      830.6313  Stability to normal     12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  and elevated                                                    received.
                                  temperatures,
                                  metals, and metal
                                  ions.
19713-72.........      830.6314  Oxidizing or            12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  reducing action.                                                received.
19713-72.........      830.6315  Flammability........    12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                                                                received.
19713-72.........      830.6316  Explodability.......    12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                                                                received.
19713-72.........      830.6317  Storage stability...    12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                                                                received.
19713-72.........      830.6319  Miscibility.........    12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                                                                received.
19713-72.........      830.6320  Corrosion               12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  characteristics.                                                received.
19713-72.........      830.6321  Dielectric breakdown    12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  voltage.                                                        received.
19713-72.........      830.7000  pH..................    12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                                                                received.
19713-72.........      830.7050  UV/Visible              12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  absorption.                                                     received.
19713-72.........      830.7100  Viscosity...........    12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                                                                received.
19713-72.........      830.7200  Melting point/          12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  melting range.                                                  received.
19713-72.........      830.7220  Boiling point/          12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  Boiling range.                                                  received.
19713-72.........      830.7300  Density/relative        12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  density.                                                        received.
19713-72.........      830.7370  Dissociation            12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  constants in water.                                             received.
19713-72.........      830.7550  Partition               12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  coefficient (n-                                                 received.
                                  octanol/water)
                                  shake flask method.
19713-72.........      830.7570  Partition               12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  coefficient (n-                                                 received.
                                  octanol/water),
                                  estimation by
                                  liquid
                                  chromatography.
19713-72.........      830.7840  Water solubility:       12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  Column elution                                                  received.
                                  method, shake flask
                                  method.
19713-72.........      830.7860  Water solubility,       12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  generator column                                                received.
                                  method.
19713-72.........      830.7950  Vapor pressure......    12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                                                                received.
19713-72.........      870.1100  Acute Oral Toxicity.    12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                                                                received.
19713-72.........      870.1200  Acute dermal            12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  toxicity.                                                       received.
19713-72.........      870.1300  Acute inhalation        12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  toxicity.                                                       received.
19713-72.........      870.2400  Acute eye irritation    12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                                                                received.
19713-72.........      870.2500  Acute dermal            12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                  irritation.                                                     received.
19713-72.........      870.2600  Skin sensitization..    12/14/2007    12/24/2007     8/20/2008  No data
                                                                                received.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. How to avoid suspension under this notice?

    1. You may avoid suspension under this notice if you or another
person adversely affected by this notice properly request a hearing
within 30 days of your receipt of the Notice of Intent To Suspend by
mail or, if you did not receive the notice that was sent to you via
USPS first class mail return receipt requested, then within 30 days
from the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register
(see DATES). If you request a hearing, it will be conducted in
accordance with the requirements of section 6(d) of FIFRA and the
Agency's procedural regulations in 40 CFR part 164. Section 3(c)(2)(B)
of FIFRA, however, provides that the only allowable issues which may be
addressed at the hearing are whether you have failed to take the
actions which are the bases of this notice and whether the Agency's
decision regarding the disposition of existing stocks is consistent
with FIFRA. Therefore, no substantive allegation or legal argument
concerning other issues, including but not limited to the Agency's
original decision to require the submission of data or other
information, the need for or utility of any of the required data or
other information or deadlines imposed, any allegations of errors or
unfairness in any proceedings before an arbitrator, and the risks and
benefits associated with continued registration of the affected
product, may be considered in the proceeding. The Administrative Law
Judge shall by order dismiss any objections which have no bearing on
the allowable issues which may be considered in the proceeding. Section
3(c)(2)(B)(iv) of FIFRA provides that any hearing must be held and a
determination issued within 75 days after receipt of a hearing request.
This 75-day period may not be extended unless all parties in the
proceeding stipulate to such an extension. If a hearing is properly
requested, the Agency will issue a final order at the conclusion of the
hearing governing the suspension of your product. A request for a
hearing pursuant to this notice must:
     Include specific objections which pertain to the allowable
issues which may be heard at the hearing.
     Identify the registrations for which a hearing is
requested.
     Set forth all necessary supporting facts pertaining to any
of the objections which you have identified in your request for a
hearing.
    If a hearing is requested by any person other than the registrant,
that person must also state specifically why he/she asserts that he/she
would be adversely affected by the suspension action described in this
notice. Three copies of the request must be submitted to: Hearing
Clerk, 1900, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. An additional copy should be sent to
the person who signed this notice. The request must be received by the
Hearing Clerk by the applicable 30th day deadline as measured from your
receipt of the Notice of Intent to

Suspend by mail or publication of this notice, as set forth in the
DATES section and in Unit IV.1., in order to be legally effective. The
30-day time limit is established by FIFRA and cannot be extended for
any reason. Failure to meet the 30-day time limit will result in
automatic suspension of your registration by operation of law and,
under such circumstances, the suspension of the registration for your
affected product will be final and effective at the close of business
on the applicable 30th day deadline as measured from your receipt of
the Notice of Intent to Suspend by mail or publication of this notice
in the Federal Register, as set forth in the DATES section and in Unit
IV.1., and will not be subject to further administrative review. The
Agency's rules of practice at 40 CFR 164.7 forbid anyone who may take
part in deciding this case, at any stage of the proceeding, from
discussing the merits of the proceeding ex parte with any party or with
any person who has been connected with the preparation or presentation
of the proceeding as an advocate or in any investigative or expert
capacity, or with any of their representatives. Accordingly, the
following EPA offices, and the staffs thereof, are designated as
judicial staff to perform the judicial function of EPA in any
administrative hearings on this Notice of Intent to Suspend: The Office
of the Administrative Law Judges, the Office of the Environmental
Appeals Board, the Administrator, the Deputy Administrator, and the
members of the staff in the immediate offices of the Administrator and
Deputy Administrator. None of the persons designated as the judicial
staff shall have any ex parte communication with trial staff or any
other interested person not employed by EPA on the merits of any of the
issues involved in this proceeding, without fully complying with the
applicable regulations.
    2. You may also avoid suspension if, within the applicable 30-day
deadline period as measured from your receipt of the Notice of Intent
to Suspend by mail or publication of this notice in the Federal
Register, as set forth in the DATES section and in Unit IV.1., the
Agency determines that you have taken appropriate steps to comply with
the FIFRA section 3(c)(2)(B) Data Call-In notice. In order to avoid
suspension under this option, you must satisfactorily comply with Table
2.--List of Requirements, in Unit II., for each product by submitting
all required supporting data/information described in Table 2 of Unit.
II. and in the Explanatory Appendix (in the docket for this Federal
Register notice) to the following address (preferably by certified
mail): Office of Pesticide Programs, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. For you to avoid automatic suspension under
this notice, the Agency must also determine within the applicable 30-
day deadline period that you have satisfied the requirements that are
the bases of this notice and so notify you in writing. You should
submit the necessary data/information as quickly as possible for there
to be any chance the Agency will be able to make the necessary
determination in time to avoid suspension of your product. The
suspension of the registration of your company's product pursuant to
this notice will be rescinded when the Agency determines you have
complied fully with the requirements which were the bases of this
notice. Such compliance may only be achieved by submission of the data/
information described in Table 2 of Unit II.

V. Status of Products That Become Suspended

    Your product will remain suspended until the Agency determines you
are in compliance with the requirements which are the bases of this
notice and so informs you in writing.
    After the suspension becomes final and effective, the registrant
subject to this notice, including all supplemental registrants of the
product listed in Table 1 of Unit II., may not legally distribute,
sell, use, offer for sale, hold for sale, ship, deliver for shipment,
or receive and (having so received) deliver or offer to deliver, to any
person, the product listed in Table 1 of Unit II. Persons other than
the registrant subject to this Notice, as defined in the preceding
sentence, may continue to distribute, sell, use, offer for sale, hold
for sale, ship, deliver for shipment, or receive and (having so
received) deliver or offer to deliver, to any person, the product
listed in Table 1 of Unit II.
    Nothing in this Notice authorizes any person to distribute, sell,
use, offer for sale, hold for sale, ship, deliver for shipment, or
receive and (having so received) deliver or offer to deliver, to any
person, the product listed in Table 1 of Unit II. in any manner which
would have been unlawful prior to the suspension.
    If the registration for your product listed in Table 1 of Unit II
is currently suspended as a result of failure to comply with another
FIFRA section 3(c)(2)(B) Data Call-In Notice or section 4 Data
Requirements notice, this notice, when it becomes a final and effective
order of suspension, will be in addition to any existing suspension,
i.e., all requirements which are the bases of the suspension must be
satisfied before the registration will be reinstated.
    It is the responsibility of the basic registrant to notify all
supplementary registered distributors of a basic registered product
that this suspension action also applies to their supplementary
registered products. The basic registrant may be held liable for
violations committed by their distributors.
    Any questions about the requirements and procedures set forth in
this notice or in the subject FIFRA section 3(c)(2)(B) Data Call-In
Notice, should be addressed to the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.

VI. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?

    The Agency's authority for taking this action is contained in
sections 3(c)(2)(B) and 6(f)(2) of FIFRA, 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: February 10, 2012.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2012-3930 Filed 2-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 121 (Monday, June 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 33998]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13748]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM98-1-000]

Records Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public Notice

    This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of
the receipt of prohibited and exempt off-the-record communications.
    Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission
decisional employees, who make or receive a prohibited or exempt off-
the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested
proceeding, to deliver to the Secretary of the Commission, a copy of
the communication, if written, or a summary of the substance of any
oral communication.
    Prohibited communications are included in a public, non-decisional
file associated with, but not a part of, the decisional record of the
proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited
communication and any responses thereto should become a part of the
decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or
contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication and may
request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and
responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant
such a request only when it determines that fairness so requires. Any
person identified below as having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the document on all parties listed on the
official service list for the applicable proceeding in accordance with
Rule 2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
    Exempt off-the-record communications are included in the decisional
record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e)(1) (v).
    The following is a list of off-the-record communications recently
received by the Secretary of the Commission. The communications listed
are grouped by docket numbers in ascending order. These filings are
available for electronic review at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number,
excluding the last three digits, in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Docket Nos.                              File date                   Presenter or requester
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Prohibited
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. P-1494-438..............................  6-11-2021                          FERC Staff.\1\
2. CP16-9-012..............................  6-16-2021                          FERC Staff.\2\
3. CP16-9-012..............................  6-17-2021                          FERC Staff.\3\
4. CP16-9-012..............................  6-17-2021                          FERC Staff.\4\
5. P-1494-438..............................  6-21-2021                          FERC Staff.\5\
6. CP16-9-012..............................  6-21-2021                          FERC Staff.\6\
7. CP16-9-012..............................  6-21-2021                          FERC Staff.\7\
8. P-405-106...............................  6-21-2021                          FERC Staff.\8\
9. P-1494-438..............................  6-21-2021                          FERC Staff.\9\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Exempt
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
None.......................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Emailed comments dated 6/10/2021 from Jennifer Martinez.
\2\ Emailed comments dated 6/16/2021 from Andrea Honore.
\3\ Emailed comments dated 6/16/2021 from Kevin Lowney and 5 other individuals.
\4\ Emailed comments dated 6/17/2021 from Ellen Van Bever and 2 other individuals.
\5\ Emailed comments dated 6/19/2021 from Nate Buckhout.
\6\ Emailed comments dated 6/17/2021 from Rosemary Wesel and 1 other individual.
\7\ Emailed comments dated 6/18/2021 from Stephanie Hamilton.
\8\ Emailed comments dated 6/19/2021 from Alex Balboa.
\9\ Emailed comments dated 6/20/2021 from Brian Reynolds.

    Dated: June 22, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-13748 Filed 6-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P