[Federal Register: April 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 63)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 16683-16685]
[DOCID:fr02ap10-19]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0280; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-259-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 777-200LR and
-300ER Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Model 777-200LR and -300ER series airplanes. This proposed AD
would require doing a high frequency eddy current inspection for
cracking of the keyway of the fuel tank access door cutout on the left
and right wings between wing rib numbers 8 (wing station 387) and 9
(wing station 414.5), and related investigative and corrective actions
if necessary. This proposed AD results from reports of cracks emanating
from the keyway of the fuel tank access door cutout of the lower wing
skin between wing rib numbers 8 and 9. We are proposing this AD to
prevent loss of the lower wing skin load path, which could cause
catastrophic structural failure of the wing.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 17, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Duong Tran, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
917-6452; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0280;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-259-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We have received reports of cracks emanating from the keyway of the
fuel tank access door cutout of the lower wing skin between wing rib
numbers 8 and 9. The keyway is found on Model 777-200LR and 777-300ER
airplanes at this location as the access door has a fuel measuring
stick installed. The keyway is used to ensure that the fuel measuring
stick is oriented properly in the access door cutout. The crack is the
result of fatigue due to the position of the keyway. After the crack
initiates, if

it grows unchecked, it could result in the loss of the lower wing skin
load path with catastrophic structural failure of the wing.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-57A0069, dated
November 5, 2009. The service bulletin describes procedures for doing a
high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection for cracking at the
keyway of the fuel tank access door cutout on the left and right wings
between wing rib numbers 8 and 9, and corrective actions if necessary.
Corrective actions include making an insurance cut of the keyway of the
fuel tank access door cutout on the left and right wings; contacting
Boeing for repair instructions and doing the repair; and changing the
profile of the keyway of the fuel tank access door cutout on the left
and right wings including doing a related investigative action. The
related investigative action is an HFEC inspection of the machined
areas for cracks.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described previously, except as discussed under
``Differences between the Proposed AD and Service Bulletin.''

Differences Between the Proposed AD and Service Bulletin

    Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-57A0069, dated November 5, 2009,
specifies to contact the manufacturer for instructions on how to repair
certain conditions, but this proposed AD would require repairing those
conditions in one of the following ways:
     Using a method that we approve; or
     Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) whom we have
authorized to make those findings.

Other Rulemaking

    The lower wing skins on The Boeing Company Model 737-900ER
airplanes have fuel tank access door cutouts with the same
configuration as those of the affected fuel tank access door cutouts on
Model 777-200LR and 777-300ER airplanes. Therefore, Model 737-900ER
airplanes may be subject to the identified unsafe condition. We are
considering similar rulemaking related to the identified unsafe
condition for certain Model 737-900ER airplanes.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 16 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take 2 work-hours per product
to comply with this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this
proposed AD to the U.S. operators to be $2,720, or $170 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2010-0280; Directorate Identifier
2009-NM-259-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by May 17, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 777-200LR
and -300ER series airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-57A0069, dated
November 5, 2009.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.

Unsafe Condition

    (e) This AD results from reports of cracks emanating from the
keyway of the fuel tank access door cutout of the lower wing skin
between wing rib numbers 8 and 9. The Federal Aviation
Administration is issuing this AD to prevent loss of the lower wing
skin load path, which could cause catastrophic structural failure of
the wing.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Inspection

    (g) At the applicable time specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and
(g)(2) of this AD, do a high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
inspection for cracking of the keyway of the fuel tank access door
cutout on the left and right wings between wing rib numbers 8 (wing
station 387) and 9 (wing station 414.5), and do all applicable
corrective actions including applicable related investigative action
(an HFEC inspection for cracking of machined areas), in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 777-57A0069, dated November 5, 2009, except as required by

paragraph (h) of this AD. Do all applicable related investigative
and corrective actions before further flight.
    (1) For Group 1, Configuration 1 airplanes, as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-57A0069, dated November 5, 2009:
Before the accumulation of 3,500 total flight cycles, or within 500
flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later.
    (2) For Group 1, Configuration 2 airplanes and Group 2
airplanes, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-
57A0069, dated November 5, 2009, on which a crack was found in the
cutout keyway when the cutout keyway was changed: Within 1,125 days
after the effective date of this AD.

    Note 1:  For Group 1, Configuration 2 airplanes and Group 2
airplanes, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-
57A0069, dated November 5, 2009, on which no crack was found in the
cutout keyway when the cutout keyway was changed: No further action
is required by this AD.

Exceptions to Service Bulletin

    (h) If any cracking is found during any inspection required by
this AD, and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-57A0069, dated
November 5, 2009, specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate
action: Before further flight, repair the crack using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph
(i) of this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Duong Tran, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S,
FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-
3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Or, e-mail
information to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 25, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-7458 Filed 4-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on January 17, 2006

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2005-20771

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Applicant:  AirSprint Inc.						Date Filed:  March 23, 2005

Relief requested:   Exemption from 49 U.S.C. § 41301 to engage in
charter air transportation of persons, property and mail between Canada
and the United States, either directly or via intermediate points in
other countries, with or without stopovers, and other charters in
accordance with 14 CFR Part 212, using aircraft of 60 or fewer seats or
with a maximum payload capacity of 18,000 pounds or less.

If renewal, date and citation of last action:  New authority

Applicant representatives:  Philip Dewsnap<PHONE_NUMBER>

DOT Analyst:  Shelita A. Smith<PHONE_NUMBER>

Responsive pleadings:  None filed

DISPOSITION

Action:  Approved in part, remainder dismissed (regarding request for
authority to serve without stopovers; see below)

 										Action date:  January 17, 2006

Effective dates of authority granted:  January 17, 2006 – January 17,
2007

Basis for approval (bilateral agreement/reciprocity):  United
States-Canada Air Transport Services Agreement (Agreement)

Except to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to the
terms, conditions, and limitations of our standard exemption conditions,
and to all applicable provisions of the U.S.-Canada Agreement.  Further,
the above grant includes authority to conduct Third and Fourth Freedom
charter operations.  Other charter operations to/from the United States
under this authority, including charters operated via intermediate
points in other countries, are subject to prior approval under 14 CFR
Part 212.  Consistent with the provisions of Article III of the
Agreement, we are requiring that charter operations conducted between
third countries and the United States, via Canada, make a stopover in
Canada for at least two consecutive nights.

Special conditions/Partial grant/Denial basis/Remarks:  Based on the
record in this case, we found that AirSprint is financially and
operationally qualified to perform the services authorized above.   We
also found that AirSprint is substantially owned and effectively
controlled by its homeland nationals.  Further, the FAA advised us that
it knows of no reason to withhold this authority.

Action taken by:  Paul L. Gretch, Director

		   Office of International Aviation

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) the applicant is qualified to perform the
proposed operations; (2) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (3) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (4) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted/deferred/dismissed, we denied

all requests in the referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke
the authority granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our
discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR §
385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date of
issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and the
filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp"
http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

Foreign Carrier Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the foreign carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Not conduct any operations unless it holds a currently effective
authorization from its homeland for such operations, and it has filed a
copy of such authorization with the Department;

(2)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration, including, but not limited to, 14 CFR Parts 129, 91, and
36, and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning
security, including, but not limited to, 49 CFR Part 1546 or 1550, as
applicable.  To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government
requirements concerning security, the holder shall, before commencing
any new service (including charter flights) from a foreign airport that
would be the holder’s last point of departure for the United States,
contact its International Principal Security Inspector (IPSI) to advise
the IPSI of its plans and to find out whether the Transportation
Security Administration has determined that security is adequate to
allow such airport(s) to be served;

(3)  Comply with the requirements for minimum insurance coverage
contained in 14 CFR Part 205, and, prior to the commencement of any
operations under this authority, file evidence of such coverage, in the
form of a completed OST Form 6411, with the Federal Aviation
Administration’s Program Management Branch (AFS-260), Flight Standards
Service (any changes to, or termination of, insurance also shall be
filed with that office);

(4)  Not operate aircraft under this authority unless it complies with
operational safety requirements at least equivalent to Annex 6 of the
Chicago Convention;

(5)  Conform to the airworthiness and airman competency requirements of
its Government for international air services;

(6)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 203,
concerning waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(7)  Agree that operations under this authority constitute a waiver of
sovereign immunity, for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1605(a), but only with
respect to those actions or proceedings instituted against it in any
court or other tribunal in the United States that are: (a)  based on its
operations in international air transportation that, according to the
contract of carriage, include a point in the United States as a point of
origin, point of destination, or agreed stopping place, or for which the
contract of carriage was purchased in the United States; or (b)  based
on a claim under any international agreement or treaty cognizable in any
court or other tribunal of the United States.  In this condition, the
term "international air transportation" means "international
transportation" as defined by the Warsaw Convention, except that all
States shall be considered to be High Contracting Parties for the
purpose of this definition;

(8)  Except as specifically authorized by the Department, originate or
terminate all flights to/from the United States in its homeland;

(9)  Comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 217, concerning the
reporting of scheduled, nonscheduled, and charter data;

(10) If charter operations are authorized, except as otherwise provided
in the applicable aviation agreement, comply with the Department's rules
governing charters (including 14 CFR Parts 212 and 380); and

(11) Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department, with all applicable orders or regulations of other U.S.
agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the United States.

This authority shall not be effective during any period when the holder
is not in compliance with the conditions imposed above.  Moreover, this
authority cannot be sold or otherwise transferred without explicit
Department approval under Title 49 of the U.S. Code.

 AirSprint ‘s application was accompanied by a motion under Rule 12
(14 CFR § 302.12) to withhold certain financial information from public
disclosure.  In support of its motion, AirSprint states that the
information is proprietary and commercially sensitive, and that
AirSprint would be adversely affected by its disclosure.  We have
reviewed the documents under the disclosure guidelines of Rule 12 and
have determined that they warrant confidential treatment.  Because of
the commercially sensitive nature of the information, we have determined
that the documents fall within the Freedom of Information Act exemption
for proprietary information and would adversely affect the competitive
position of AirSprint under 49 U.S.C. § 40115.

05/2004


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 150 (Friday, August 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 48018]
[FR Doc No: 2022-16815]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0751; FRL-9969-01-OCSPP]

Pesticide Registration Review; Decisions and Case Closures for
Several Pesticides; Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's interim
registration review decisions for the following chemicals: Laminarin
and Linalool. In addition, this notice announces the closure of the
registration review case for nabam and denatonium saccharide because
the last U.S. registrations for these pesticides have been canceled.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0751, is available online at
https://www.regulations.gov. Additional instructions on visiting the
docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is
available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For pesticide specific information,
contact: The Chemical Review Manager for the pesticide of interest
identified in Table 1 in Unit IV.
    For general information on the registration review program,
contact: Melanie Biscoe, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (7508P),
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; email address:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the pesticide specific contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.

II. What is registration review?

    Registration review is EPA's periodic review of pesticide
registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the
statutory standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform
its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human
health or the environment. As part of the registration review process,
the Agency has completed interim or final decisions for all pesticides
listed in Table 1 in Unit IV. Through this program, EPA is ensuring
that each pesticide's registration is based on current scientific and
other knowledge, including its effects on human health and the
environment.

III. What is the Agency authority?

    EPA is conducting its registration review of the chemicals listed
in Table 1 in Unit IV. pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural
Regulations for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C.
FIFRA section 3(g) provides, among other things, that the registrations
of pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under FIFRA, a
pesticide product may be registered or remain registered only if it
meets the statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA section
3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(5)). When used in accordance with widespread
and commonly recognized practice, the pesticide product must perform
its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on the
environment; that is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the
environment, or a human dietary risk from residues that result from the
use of a pesticide in or on food.

IV. What action is the Agency taking?

    Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58, this notice announces the availability
of EPA's interim registration review decisions for the pesticides shown
in Table 1. The registration review decisions are supported by
rationales included in the docket established for each chemical.

                      Table 1--Registration Review Interim and Final Decisions Being Issued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Chemical review manager and
    Registration review case name and number             Docket ID No.                contact information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Laminarin Case Number 6309.....................          EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0445  Jennifer Odom,
                                                                                [email protected], (202) 566-
                                                                                1536.
Linalool Case Number 6058......................          EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0423  Hannah Dean, [email protected],
<PHONE_NUMBER>.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed interim registration review decisions for the
chemicals in the table above were posted to the docket and the public
was invited to submit any comments or new information. EPA addressed
the comments or information received during the 60-day comment period
for the proposed interim decisions in the discussion for each pesticide
listed in the table. Comments from the 60-day comment period that were
received may or may not have affected the Agency's interim or final
decision. Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), the registration review case
docket for the chemicals listed in the Table will remain open until all
actions required in the decision have been completed.
    This document also announces the closure of the registration review
case for nabam (Case No. 0641, Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0339), and
the case closure for denatonium saccharide (Case No. 7625, Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0441) because the last U.S. registrations for these
pesticides have been canceled.
    Background on the registration review program is provided at:
https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation.
    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: August 2, 2022.
Mary Elissa Reaves,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2022-16815 Filed 8-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P