	INDEX TO DOCKET EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0799

	Determination of Attainment for the Sacramento Nonattainment Area for
the 2006 Fine Particle Standard; California; Determination Regarding
Applicability of Clean Air Act Requirements

FINAL AND PROPOSED RULE

CATEGORY I.	NOTICE OF FINAL RULEMAKING

Reserved

CATEGORY II.	NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

Proposed Rule, “Determination of Attainment for the Sacramento
Nonattainment Area for the 2006 Fine Particle Standard; California;
Determination Regarding Applicability of Clean Air Act Requirements”
October 15, 2012. (pre-publication version)

CATEGORY III.	INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

Not Applicable

CATEGORY IV.	OFFICIAL PUBLIC COMMENTS

Reserved (if comments are submitted)

CATEGORY V. 	FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES

57 FR 13498, State Implementation Plan; General Preamble for the
Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, April
16, 1992.

58 FR 51735, Executive Order 12866, October 4, 1993.

59 FR 7629, Executive Order 12898, February 16, 1994.

60 FR 36723, Determination of Attainment of Ozone Standard for Salt Lake
and Davis Counties, Utah, and Determination Regarding Applicability of
Certain Reasonable Further Progress and Attainment Demonstration
Requirements, July 18, 1995.

61 FR 20458, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and
Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Ohio, May 7,
1996.

61 FR 31832, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and
Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; State of
Michigan, June 21, 1996.

62 FR 19885, Executive Order 13045, April 23, 1997.

62 FR 38652, National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate
Matter, July 18, 1997.

64 FR 43255, Executive Order 13132, August 10, 1999.

65 FR 37879, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and
Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Ohio and
Kentucky, June 19, 2000.

65 FR 67249, Executive Order 13175, November 9, 2000.

66 FR 28355, Executive Order 13211, May 22, 2001.

66 FR 53094, Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation
Plans and Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes;
Pennsylvania; Redesignation of Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley Ozone
Nonattainment Area to Attainment and Approval of Miscellaneous
Revisions, October 19, 2001.

68 FR 25418, Determination of Attainment of Ozone Standard, St. Louis
Area; Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans, and
Redesignation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes, State of
Missouri, May 12, 2003.

69 FR 21717 Determination of Attainment of the 1-Hour Ozone Standard;
Determination Regarding Applicability of Certain Clean Air Act
Requirements; Approval and Promulgation of Ozone Attainment Plan; San
Francisco Bay Area, CA, April 22, 2004.

70 FR 71612, Final Rule to Implement the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standard — Phase 2, November 29, 2005.

71 FR 61144, National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate
Matter, October 17, 2006.

71 FR 61236, Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations, Final
Rule, October 17, 2006.

72 FR 20586, Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule, (April 25,
2007)

74 FR 58688, Air Quality Designations for the 2006 24-Hour Fine Particle
(PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards, November 13, 2009.

75 FR 56, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and
Designations of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; North Carolina:
Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point; Determination of Attaining Data for
the 1997 Fine Particulate Matter Standard, January 4, 2010.

75 FR 230, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and
Designations of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; North Carolina:
Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir; Determination of Attaining Data for the 1997
Fine Particulate Matter Standard, January 5, 2010.

75 FR 6570, Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation
Plans; Louisiana; Baton Rouge 1-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area;
Determination of Attainment of the 1-Hour Ozone Standard, February 10,
2010.

75 FR 27944, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans;
Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; State of
California; PM–10; Determination of Attainment for the Coso Junction
Nonattainment Area; Determination Regarding Applicability of Certain
Clean Air Act Requirements, May 19, 2010.

75 FR 31288, Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation
Plans; Rhode Island; Determination of Attainment of the 1997 Ozone
Standard, June 3, 2010.

75 FR 53219, Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation
Plans; Connecticut; Determination of Attainment of the 1997 Ozone
Standard for the Greater Connecticut Area, August 31, 2010.

75 FR 54778, Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation
Plans; Louisiana; Baton Rouge 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area;
Determination of Attainment of the 8-Hour Ozone Standard, September 9,
2010.

75 FR 62470, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and
Designations of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Tennessee:
Knoxville; Determination of Attaining Data for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone
Standards, October 12, 2010.

75 FR 64949, Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation
Plans; Rhode Island; Determination of Attainment of the 1997 Ozone
Standard for the Providence, RI Area, October 21, 2010.

76 FR 11080, Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation
Plans; Wisconsin; The Milwaukee-Racine and Sheboygan Areas;
Determination of Attainment of the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard, March 1,
2011.

76 FR 12860, Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation
Plans; Indiana; Kentucky; Louisville Nonattainment Area; Determination
of Attainment of the 1997 Annual Fine Particle Standard, March 9, 2011.

76 FR 18650, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and
Designations of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Georgia: Rome;
Determination of Attaining Data for the 1997 Annual Fine Particulate
Standard, April 5, 2011.

76 FR 31237, Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation
Plans; Pennsylvania; Determination of Attainment for the
Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, May 31, 2011.

76 FR 31239, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and
Designations of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Alabama,
Georgia, and Tennessee: Chattanooga; Determination of Attaining Data for
the 1997 Annual Fine Particulate Standard, May 31, 2011.

76 FR 31858, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and
Designations of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Georgia: Macon;
Determination of Attaining Data for the 1997 Annual Fine Particulate
Standard,  June 2, 2011.

76 FR 33647, Approval and Promulgation of Determination of Attainment
for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard: States of Missouri and Illinois,
June 9, 2011.

76 FR 36873, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and
Designations of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Georgia:
Atlanta; Determination of Attainment for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone
Standards, June 23, 2011.

76 FR 38023, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and
Designations of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Alabama:
Birmingham; Determination of Attaining Data for the 1997 Annual Fine
Particulate Standard, June 29, 2011.

76 FR 55542, Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation
Plans; West Virginia: Kentucky; Ohio; Huntington-Ashland Nonattainment
Area; Determinations of Attainment of the 1997 Annual Fine Particulate
Standards, September 7, 2011.

76 FR 60373, Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation
Plans; Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana; Cincinnati-Hamilton Nonattainment
Area; Determinations of Attainment of the 1997 Annual Fine Particulate
Standards (September 29, 2011, Cincinnati, Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana, 1997
PM2.5.

76 FR 70656, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and
Designations of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes;
Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC and SC; Determination of Attainment of
the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard, November 15, 2011.

77 FR 18922, Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation
Plans; Pennsylvania; Determinations of Clean Data for the 2006 24-Hour
Fine Particulate Standard for the Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle-York,
Allentown, Johnstown, and Lancaster Nonattainment Areas, March 29, 2012.

77 FR 31496, Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation
Plans; Massachusetts and New Hampshire; Determination of Attainment of
the One-Hour and 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone Standards for Eastern
Massachusetts, May 29, 2012.

CATEGORY VI.	OTHER DOCUMENTS

Memorandum from John Calcagni, “Procedures for Processing Requests to
Redesignate Areas to Attainment,” September 4, 1992.

Memorandum from John S. Seitz, Director, Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards, “Reasonable Further Progress, Attainment Demonstration,
and Related Requirements for Ozone Nonattainment Areas Meeting the Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard,” May 10, 1995.

Memorandum from Steve Page, Director, EPA Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards, “Clean Data Policy for the Fine Particle National
Ambient Air Quality Standards,” December 14, 2004.

Our Children's Earth Foundation v. EPA, No. 04-73032 (9th Cir. June 28,
2005 (Memorandum Opinion))

Letter from Deborah Jordan, Director, Air Division, U.S. EPA Region IX,
to James Goldstene, Executive Officer, California Air Resources Board
transmitting findings of EPA’s Summer 2007 Technical System Audit of
CARB's ambient air monitoring program, August 18, 2008.

Technical System Audit of the California Environmental Protection Agency
Air Resources Board, 2007, USEPA Region 9, August 2008.

Latino Issues Forum v. EPA, Nos. 06-75831 and 08-71238 (9th Cir. March
2, 2009 (Memorandum Opinion)).

Letter from Joseph Lapka, Acting Manager, Air Quality Analysis Office,
EPA Region IX, to Larry Greene, Air Pollution Control Officer,
Sacramento Metro Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) approving
SMAQMD’s “2009 Annual Monitoring Network Plan.” September 29,
2009.

Letter from Joseph Lapka, Acting Manager, Air Quality Analysis Office,
EPA Region IX, to Karen Magliano, Chief, Air Quality Data Branch,
Planning and Technical Support Division, California Air Resources Board
approving CARB’s “2009 Annual Monitoring Network Report for Small
Districts in California.” November 24, 2009.

Letter from Karen Magliano, Chief, Air Quality Data Branch, Planning and
Technical Support Division, California Air Resources Board, to Jared
Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX, certifying calendar
year 2009 ambient air quality data and quality assurance data, May 19,
2010.

Letter from Matthew Lakin, Manager, Air Quality Analysis Office, EPA
Region IX, to Karen Magliano, Chief, Air Quality Data Branch, Planning
and Technical Support Division, California Air Resources Board approving
CARB’s “2010 Annual Monitoring Network Plan for the Small Districts
in California.” October 29, 2010.

Letter from Matthew Lakin, Manager, Air Quality Analysis Office, EPA
Region IX, to Larry Greene, Air Pollution Control Officer, SMAQMD
approving SMAQMD’s Annual Monitoring Network Plan submitted on July
2010. November 1, 2010.

Letter from Karen Magliano, Chief, Air Quality Data Branch, Planning and
Technical Support Division, California Air Resources Board, to Jared
Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX, certifying calendar
year 2010 ambient air quality data and quality assurance data, April 28,
2011.

California Air Resources Board’s Annual Network Plan Report for Small
Districts in California, June 2011.

SMAQMD’s 2011 Annual Monitoring Network Plan.

Letter from Matthew Lakin, Manager, Air Quality Analysis Office, EPA
Region IX, to Larry Greene, Air Pollution Control Officer, SMAQMD
approving SMAQMD’s “2011 Annual Monitoring Network Plan.” October
31, 2011.

Letter from Matthew Lakin, Manager, Air Quality Analysis Office, EPA
Region IX, to Karen Magliano, Chief, Air Quality Data Branch, Planning
and Technical Support Division, California Air Resources Board approving
CARB’s “2011 Annual Monitoring Network Plan for the Small Districts
in California.” November 1, 2011.

Memorandum from Stephen D. Page, Director, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Implementation Guidance for the 2006 24-Hour
Fine Particle (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS),
March 2, 2012.

Letter from Karen Magliano, Chief, Air Quality Data Branch, Planning and
Technical Support Division, California Air Resources Board, to Jared
Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX, certifying calendar
year 2011 ambient air quality data and quality assurance data, May 1,
2012.

Letter from James Goldstene, Executive Officer of the California Air
Resources Board, to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, USEPA
Region IX, requesting EPA find the Sacramento 24-hour PM2.5
nonattainment area attained the 2006 24-hour fine particulate National
Ambient Air Quality Standard, May 9, 2012.

Monitor Description Report for Sacramento nonattainment area, U.S. EPA
Air Quality System, September 14, 2012.

Data Completeness Report Year 2009 for Sacramento nonattainment area,
U.S. EPA Air Quality System, August 31, 2012.

Data Completeness Report Year 2010 for Sacramento nonattainment area,
U.S. EPA Air Quality System, August 31, 2012.

Data Completeness Report Year 2011 for Sacramento nonattainment area,
U.S. EPA Air Quality System, August 31, 2012.

Data Completeness Report Year 2012 for Sacramento nonattainment area,
U.S. EPA Air Quality System, August 31, 2012.

Air Quality System Design Value Report providing PM2.5 design values and
air monitoring data at monitoring stations in Sacramento nonattainment
area, U.S. EPA Air Quality System, August 31, 2012.

California Air Resources Board’s Annual Network Plan Report for Small
Districts in California, June 2012.

Letter from Deborah Jordan, Director, Air Division, U.S. EPA Region IX,
to James Goldstene, Executive Officer, California Air Resources Board
transmitting findings of EPA’s 2011 Technical System Audit of CARB's
ambient air monitoring program, October 22, 2012. Enclosure: System
Audit of the Ambient Monitoring Program: California Air Resources Board,
June-September 2011, USEPA Region 9, Final Report: October 2012.

SMAQMD’s 2012 Annual Monitoring Network Plan.

Letter from Matthew Lakin, Manager, Air Quality Analysis Office, EPA
Region IX, to Larry Greene, Air Pollution Control Officer, SMAQMD
approving SMAQMD’s 2012 Annual Monitoring Network Plan. March 1, 2013.

Letter from Matthew Lakin, Manager, Air Quality Analysis Office, EPA
Region IX, to Karen Magliano, Chief, Air Quality Data Branch, Planning
and Technical Support Division, California Air Resources Board approving
CARB’s “2012 Annual Monitoring Network Plan for the Small Districts
in California.” April 19, 2013.

Letter from Sylvia Vanderspek, Chief, Air Quality Planning  Branch,
California Air Resources Board, to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional
Administrator, EPA Region IX, certifying calendar year 2012 ambient air
quality data and quality assurance data, May 1, 2012.

Air Quality System Design Value Report providing PM2.5 design values and
air monitoring data at monitoring stations in Sacramento nonattainment
area, 2010-2012, U.S. EPA Air Quality System, May 30, 2013.

Air Quality System Data Completeness Report for PM2.5 air monitoring
stations in Sacramento nonattainment area for 2012, U.S. EPA Air Quality
System, May 30, 2013.

Air Quality System Raw Data Report providing PM2.5 air monitoring data
at monitoring stations in Sacramento nonattainment area for 2009-2012,
U.S. EPA Air Quality System, May 30, 2013.

  PAGE   \* MERGEFORMAT  9


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 112 (Friday, June 10, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 37565]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13793]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 261

[EPA-HQ-RCRA-2016-0040; FRL-9947-60-OLEM]

Hazardous Waste Management System; Tentative Denial of Petition
To Revise the RCRA Corrosivity Hazardous Characteristic

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) is
extending the comment period on the tentative denial of a petition to
revise the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) corrosivity
hazardous waste characteristic regulation, published in the Federal
Register on April 11, 2016. EPA is tentatively denying the rulemaking
petition because the materials submitted in support of the petition
fail to demonstrate that the requested regulatory revisions are
warranted, as further explained in the tentative denial. The Agency's
review of additional materials it identified as relevant to the
petition similarly did not demonstrate that any change to the
corrosivity characteristic regulation is warranted at this time. The
comment period is being extended to December 7, 2016.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 7, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
RCRA-2016-0040, at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Helms, Materials Recovery and
Waste Management Division, Office of Resource Conservation and
Recovery, (5304P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document extends the public comment
period on the tentative denial of a petition to revise the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) corrosivity hazardous waste
characteristic regulation, published in the Federal Register on April
11, 2016 (81 FR 21295). In that Federal Register notice, the Agency
tentatively denied petitioners' requests that the Agency make two
changes to the current RCRA corrosivity characteristic regulation: (1)
Revise the regulatory value for defining waste as corrosive from the
current value of pH 12.5, to pH 11.5; and (2) expand the scope of the
RCRA corrosivity definition to include nonaqueous wastes in addition to
the aqueous wastes currently regulated. Petitioner-Public Employees for
Environmental Responsibility (``PEER'') has requested that the Agency
extend the public comment period to allow additional time to evaluate
the record supporting the tentative denial. EPA is hereby extending the
comment period, which was set to end on June 10, 2016, to December 7,
2016. Late comments on this tentative denial may not be considered.
    To submit comments or access the docket, please follow the detailed
instructions as provided under ADDRESSES. If you have questions,
consult the individuals listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Dated: June 3, 2016.
Barnes Johnson,
Director, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.
[FR Doc. 2016-13793 Filed 6-9-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 163 (Thursday, August 24, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 57882]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18268]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-USCG-0689]

Safety Zones; Annual Events in the Captain of the Port Buffalo
Zone

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notification of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce a safety zone that encompasses
certain navigable waters on Lake Erie, for the Head of the Cuyahoga, in
Cleveland, Ohio. This action is necessary and intended for the safety
of life and property on navigable waters during this event. During the
enforcement period, no person or vessel may enter the respective safety
zone without the permission of the Captain of the Port Buffalo or a
designated representative.

DATES: The regulation listed in 33 CFR 165.939, Table 165.939 (d)(3)
will be enforced from 5 a.m. through 5 p.m. on September 16, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notice of enforcement, call or email LT Jared Stevens, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit Cleveland;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce a Safety Zone;
for the Annual Event in the Captain of the Port Buffalo Zone, listed in
33 CFR 165.939, Table 165.939(d)(3) for the Head of the Cuyahoga in
Cleveland, Ohio. All U.S. waters of the Cuyahoga River, between a line
drawn perpendicular to the river banks from position 41[deg]29'55'' N,
081[deg]42'23'' W (NAD 83) just past the Detroit-Superior Viaduct
bridge at MM 1.42 of the Cuyahoga River south to a line drawn
perpendicular to the river banks at position 41[deg]28'32'' N,
081[deg]40'16'' W (NAD 83) just south of the Interstate 490 bridge at
MM 4.79 of the Cuyahoga River.
    Pursuant to 33 CFR 165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the safety zone during an enforcement period is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or a designated
representative. Those seeking permission to enter the safety zone may
request permission from the Captain of Port Buffalo via channel 16,
VHF-FM. Vessels and persons granted permission to enter the safety zone
shall obey the directions of the Captain of the Port Buffalo or a
designated representative. While within a safety zone, all vessels
shall operate at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course.
    This notice of enforcement is issued under authority of 33 CFR
165.939 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this notice of enforcement
in the Federal Register, the Coast Guard will provide the maritime
community with advance notification of this enforcement period via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners or Local Notice to Mariners. If the
Captain of the Port Buffalo determines that the safety zone need not be
enforced for the full duration stated in this notice, he may use a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners to grant general permission to enter the
respective safety zone.

    Dated: August 17, 2023.
M.I. Kuperman,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2023-18268 Filed 8-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


Served: August 5, 2004

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 5th day of August, 2004

INTRA ALASKA BUSH SERVICE MAIL RATES

Docket OST-2003-14694

NOTICE

On July 22, 2004, pursuant to Rule 302.11, the Department granted the
Consolidated Carriers an extension until August 9, 2004, to submit
comments to Order 2004-6-4, establishing linehaul mail rates for Part
135 carriers.  On July 15, the Department issued Order 2004-7-11,
requesting comments by August 16 on the new intra-Alaska terminal mail
rate.

On July 29, 2004, Peninsula Airways requested that the filing deadline
for response to all of the bush mail orders be extended to August 20.
Peninsula says it needs the additional time to complete its analysis of
the many complex and inter-related aspects of the Department’s
proposed new rate-making policies, and such an extension will facilitate
the issuance of a comprehensive and well-reasoned decision by the
Department.  Peninsula further notes that the proposed rates are already
in effect, and the requested extension of time will not prejudice any
party.

We have received no objections to Peninsula’s request.  Procedurally,
at this stage in the process it should be simpler to put all of the
inter-related issues on the same procedural time frame.  In addition,
there is an informal meeting among the parties scheduled for August 19.
The results of that meeting may influence parties’ positions.  For
these reasons, we will extend the initial filing deadline for all three
linehaul rates (Part 121, Part 135 and Amphibious) and the terminal
rate to September 3, 2004.

By:

KARAN K. BHATIA

Assistant Secretary for Aviation

    and International Affairs

(SEAL)

-  PAGE 2  -


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 184 (Monday, September 25, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44527-44529]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20440]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 62

[EPA-R02-OAR-2017-0132; FRL-9968-13-Region 2]

Approval and Promulgation of Plans for Designated Facilities; New
Jersey; Delegation of Authority

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a
request from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
(NJDEP) for delegation of authority to implement and enforce the
Federal plan for Sewage Sludge Incineration (SSI) units. On April 29,
2016, the EPA promulgated the Federal plan for SSI units to fulfill the
requirements of the Clean Air Act. The Federal plan addresses the
implementation and enforcement of the emission guidelines applicable to
existing SSI units located in areas not covered by an approved and
currently effective state plan. The Federal plan imposes emission
limits and other control requirements for existing affected SSI
facilities which will reduce designated pollutants.
    On January 24, 2017, the NJDEP signed a Memorandum of Agreement
which is intended to be the mechanism for the transfer of authority
between the EPA and the NJDEP and defines the policies,
responsibilities and procedures pursuant to the Federal plan for
existing SSI units.

DATES: This rule will be effective October 25, 2017.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R02-OAR-2017-0132. All documents in the docket are
listed on the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential
Business Information or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony (Ted) Gardella, Environmental
Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007-1866, at
(212) 637-3892, or by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. What action is the EPA taking today?

    The EPA is approving the NJDEP's request for delegation of
authority to implement and enforce a Federal plan and to adhere to the
terms and conditions prescribed in the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)
signed between the EPA and the NJDEP,

as further explained below. The NJDEP requested delegation of authority
of the Federal plan for existing applicable Sewage Sludge Incineration
(SSI) units constructed on or before October 14, 2010. See 40 CFR part
62, subpart LLL. The Federal plan was promulgated by the EPA to
implement emission guidelines (see 40 CFR part 60, subpart MMMM)
pursuant to sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The
purpose of this delegation is to acknowledge the NJDEP's ability to
implement a program and to transfer primary implementation and
enforcement responsibility from the EPA to the NJDEP for existing
applicable sources of SSI units. While the NJDEP is delegated the
authority to implement and enforce the SSI Federal plan, nothing in the
delegation agreement shall prohibit the EPA from enforcing the SSI
Federal plan.

II. What was submitted by the NJDEP and how did the EPA respond?

    On October 12, 2016, the NJDEP submitted to the EPA a request for
delegation of authority from the EPA to implement and enforce the
Federal plan for existing SSI units. The EPA prepared the MOA that
defines the policies, responsibilities, and procedures by which the
Federal plan will be administered by both the NJDEP and the EPA,
pursuant to 40 CFR part 62, subpart LLL for SSI units. The MOA is the
mechanism for the transfer of responsibility from the EPA to the NJDEP.
    Both the EPA and the NJDEP signed the MOA in which the State agrees
to the terms and conditions of the MOA and accepts responsibility to
implement and enforce the policies, responsibilities and procedures of
the SSI Federal plan. The transfer of authority to the NJDEP became
effective upon signature by the NJDEP on January 24, 2017.

III. What comments were received in response to the EPA's proposed
action?

    On July 13, 2017 (82 FR 32301), the EPA proposed to approve NJDEP's
request for delegation of the SSI Federal plan. For a detailed
discussion on the content and requirements of the NJDEP's delegation
request, the reader is referred to the EPA's proposed rulemaking
action. In response to the EPA's July 13, 2017 proposed rulemaking
action, the EPA received no public comments.

IV. What is the EPA's conclusion?

    For the reasons described in this action and in the EPA's proposal
the EPA is approving NJDEP's request for delegation of the SSI Federal
plan. For further details, the reader is referred to the EPA's
proposal.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
State plan submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA
sections 111(d) and 129(b)(2) and applicable Federal regulations. 42
U.S.C. 7411(d) and 7429(b)(2); 40 CFR 62.02(a). Thus, in reviewing
State plan submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves a state delegation request as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
already imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule, pertaining to the NJDEP's section 111(d)/
129 request for delegation of authority to implement and enforce the
Federal plan for existing SSI units, does not have tribal implications
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the NJDEP's request for delegation of the SSI Federal plan is
not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA
notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 24, 2017. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Administrative
practice and procedure, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Waste treatment and disposal.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: September 13, 2017.
Walter Mugdan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 2.

    Part 62, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 62--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED
FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart FF--New Jersey

0
2. Add Sec.  62.7607 and an undesignated heading to subpart FF to read
as follows:
    Air Emissions from Existing Sewage Sludge Incineration Units

Sec.  62.7607   Identification of plan--delegation of authority.

    (a) Letter from the New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection (NJDEP), submitted October 12, 2016, requesting delegation
of authority from the EPA to implement and enforce the Federal plan for
existing Sewage Sludge Incineration (SSI) units. The Federal plan will
be administered by both the NJDEP and the EPA, pursuant to ``Federal
Plan Requirements for Sewage Sludge Incineration Units Constructed on
or Before October 14, 2010'' 40 CFR 62.15855-62.16050.
    (b) Identification of sources. The Federal plan applies to owners
or operators of existing facilities that meet all three of the
following criteria:
    (1) The SSI unit(s) commenced construction on or before October 14,
2010;
    (2) The SSI unit(s) meets the definition of an SSI unit as defined
in Sec.  62.16045; and
    (3) The SSI unit(s) is not exempt under Sec.  62.15860.
    (c) On December 27, 2016, the EPA prepared and signed a Memorandum
of Agreement (MOA) between the EPA and NJDEP that define the policies,
responsibilities and procedures pursuant to the SSI Federal plan
identified in (a) above by which the Federal plan will be administered
by both the NJDEP and the EPA. On January 24, 2017, Bob Martin, NJDEP
Commissioner, signed the MOA, therefore agreeing to the terms and
conditions of the MOA and accepting responsibility to enforce and
implement the policies, responsibilities, and procedures for existing
SSI units.
    (d) The delegation became fully effective on January 24, 2017, the
date the MOA was signed by the NJDEP Commissioner.

[FR Doc. 2017-20440 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: February 25, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 37)]
[Notices]
[Page 8693-8694]
[DOCID:fr25fe10-68]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-719-000]

Matched LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate
Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

February 17, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Matched LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is March 9, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC

Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call (866)
208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-3801 Filed 2-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 236 (Friday, December 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 73027]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29580]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER12-668-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits ELMP Status Report and Planned Implementation date.
    Filed Date: 11/19/12.
    Accession Number: 20121119-5128.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/10/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-471-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: 2012-11-29 Amendment to Implement Financial and Credit
Policy Enhancements to be effective 2/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/29/12.
    Accession Number: 20121129-5097.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/20/12.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 29, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-29580 Filed 12-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61615-61617]
[FR Doc No: 2022-22131]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2022-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2280]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Federal
Regulations. The currently effective community number is shown in the
table below and must be used for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will be finalized on the dates
listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS report in
effect prior to this determination for the listed communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has 90 days in
which to request through the community that the Deputy Associate
Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected]; or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Nicholas A. Shufro,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management (Acting), Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Location and  case     Chief executive  officer of                                   Online location of  letter of map                           Community
        State and  county                   No.                      community              Community map  repository                 revision                Date of  modification      No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona:
    Maricopa.....................  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Bill Gates,       Flood Control District of      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 6, 2023..........       040037
                                    of Maricopa County     Chair, Board of Supervisors,    Maricopa County, 2801 West     advanceSearch.
                                    (22-09-0553P).         Maricopa County, 301 West       Durango Street, Phoenix, AZ
                                                           Jefferson Street, 10th Floor,   85009.
                                                           Phoenix, AZ 85003.
    Pima.........................  Town of Marana (22-09- The Honorable Ed Honea, Mayor,  Engineering Department,        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 13, 2023.........       040118
                                    0373P).                Town of Marana, 11555 West      Marana Municipal Complex,      advanceSearch.
                                                           Civic Center Drive, Marana,     11555 West Civic Center
                                                           AZ 85653.                       Drive, Marana, AZ 85653.
California:
    Nevada.......................  City of Grass Valley   The Honorable Ben Aguilar,      Public Works Department, 125   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 12, 2023.........       060211
                                    (22-09-0608P).         Mayor, City of Grass Valley,    East Main Street, Grass        advanceSearch.
                                                           125 East Main Street, Grass     Valley, CA 95945.
                                                           Valley, CA 95945.
    Placer.......................  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Cindy Gustafson,  Placer County Public Works,    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 9, 2023..........       060239
                                    of Placer County (22-  Chair, Placer County Board of   3091 County Center Drive,      advanceSearch.
                                    09-0128P).             Supervisors, 175 Fulweiler      Suite 220, Auburn, CA 95603.
                                                           Avenue, Suite 206, Auburn, CA
                                                           95603.
    Riverside....................  City of Moreno Valley  The Honorable Yxstian A.        Public Works Department,       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 9, 2023..........       065074
                                    (22-09-0602P).         Gutierrez, Mayor, City of       14177 Frederick Street,        advanceSearch.
                                                           Moreno Valley, 14177            Moreno Valley, CA 92552.
                                                           Frederick Street, Moreno
                                                           Valley, CA 92552.
    San Bernardino...............  City of Fontana (20-   The Honorable Acquanetta        City Hall, Engineering         https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Dec. 12, 2022.........       060274
                                    09-1006P).             Warren, Mayor, City of          Department, 8353 Sierra        advanceSearch.
                                                           Fontana, 8353 Sierra Avenue,    Avenue, San Bernardino, CA
                                                           Fontana, CA 92335.              92415.
    San Bernardino...............  City of Rialto (20-09- The Honorable Deborah           City Hall, 150 South Palm      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Dec. 12, 2022.........       060280
                                    1006P).                Robertson, Mayor, City of       Avenue, Rialto, CA 92376.      advanceSearch.
                                                           Rialto, 150 South Palm
                                                           Avenue, Rialto, CA 92376.
    San Bernardino...............  City of San            The Honorable John Valdivia,    City Hall, 300 North D         https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Dec. 12, 2022.........       060281
                                    Bernardino (20-09-     Mayor, City of San              Street, San Bernardino, CA     advanceSearch.
                                    1006P).                Bernardino, 290 North D         92418.
                                                           Street, San Bernardino, CA
                                                           92401.
    San Bernardino...............  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Curt Hagman,      San Bernardino County Public   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Dec. 12, 2022.........       060270
                                    of San Bernardino      Chair, Board of Supervisors,    Works, Water Resources         advanceSearch.
                                    County (20-09-         San Bernardino County, 385      Department, 825 East 3rd
                                    1006P).                North Arrowhead Avenue, 5th     Street, San Bernardino, CA
                                                           Floor, San Bernardino, CA       92415.
                                                           92415.
Florida:
    Nassau.......................  Town of Callahan (21-  The Honorable Matthew Davis,    Town Hall, 542300 US Highway   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 12, 2023.........       120171
                                    04-4290P).             Mayor, Town of Callahan,        1, Callahan, FL 32011.         advanceSearch.
                                                           542300 US Hwy 1, Callahan, FL
                                                           32011.
    Nassau.......................  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Jeff Gray,        Nassau County Building         https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 12, 2023.........       120170
                                    of Nassau County (21-  Chair, Nassau County Board of   Department, 96161 Nassau       advanceSearch.
                                    04-4290P).             Commissioners, 97572 Pirates    Place, Yulee, FL 32097.
                                                           Point Road, Yulee, FL 32097.
Hawaii: Honolulu.................  City and County of     The Honorable Rick Blangiardi,  Department of Planning and     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Dec. 6, 2022..........       150001
                                    Honolulu (21-09-       Mayor, City and County of       Permitting, 650 South King     advanceSearch.
                                    0747P).                Honolulu, 530 South King        Street, 1st Floor, Honolulu,
                                                           Street, Room 300, Honolulu,     HI 96813.
                                                           HI 96813.
Idaho:

    Blaine.......................  City of Ketchum (22-   The Honorable Neil Bradshaw,    City Hall, 480 East Avenue     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Dec. 22, 2022.........       160023
                                    10-0349P).             Mayor, City of Ketchum, City    North, Ketchum, ID 83340.      advanceSearch.
                                                           Hall, P.O. Box 2315, Ketchum,
                                                           ID 83340.
    Blaine.......................  Unincorporated Areas   Chair Dick Fosbury, Blaine      Blaine County Planning &       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Dec. 22, 2022.........       165167
                                    of Blaine County (22-  County Board of                 Zoning, 219 1st Avenue         advanceSearch.
                                    10-0349P).             Commissioners, Old County       South, Suite 208, Hailey, ID
                                                           Courthouse, 206 South 1st       83333.
                                                           Avenue, Hailey, ID 83333.
Nevada:
    Clark........................  City of North Las      The Honorable John J. Lee,      Public Works Department, 2250  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 11, 2023.........       320007
                                    Vegas (22-09-0330P).   Mayor, City of North Las        Las Vegas Boulevard North,     advanceSearch.
                                                           Vegas, 2250 Las Vegas           Suite 200, North Las Vegas,
                                                           Boulevard North, North Las      NV 89030.
                                                           Vegas, NV 89030.
    Washoe.......................  City of Sparks (22-09- The Honorable Ed Lawson,        City Hall, 431 Prater Way,     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Dec. 12, 2022.........       320021
                                    0027P).                Mayor, City of Sparks, 431      Sparks, NV 89431.              advanceSearch.
                                                           Prater Way, Sparks, NV 89431.
    Washoe.......................  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Vaughn Hartung,   Washoe County Administration   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Dec. 12, 2022.........       320019
                                    of Washoe County (22-  Chair, Board of                 Building, Department of        advanceSearch.
                                    09-0027P).             Commissioners, Washoe County,   Public Works, 1001 East 9th
                                                           1001 East 9th Street, Reno,     Street, Reno, NV 89512.
                                                           NV 89512.
Washington: Okanogan.............  Unincorporated Areas   Chair Chris Branch, Board of    Okanogan Planning Department,  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Dec. 16, 2022.........       530117
                                    of Okanogan County     Commissioners, District 1,      123 North 5th Street,          advanceSearch.
                                    (22-10-0287P).         149 North 3rd Avenue,           Okanogan, WA 98840.
                                                           Okanogan, WA 98840.
Wisconsin:
    Brown........................  Unincorporated Areas   Commissioner Patrick Buckley,   Brown County Zoning Office,    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Dec. 19, 2022.........       550020
                                    of Brown County (22-   Brown County, 305 East Walnut   305 East Walnut Street,        advanceSearch.
                                    05-0903P).             Street, Green Bay, WI 54305.    Green Bay, WI 54301.
    Brown........................  Village of Bellevue    President Steve Soukup,         Village Hall, 2828 Allouez     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Dec. 15, 2022.........       550627
                                    (21-05-4432P).         Village of Bellevue, 2828       Avenue, Bellevue, WI 54311.    advanceSearch.
                                                           Allouez Avenue, Bellevue, WI
                                                           54311.
    Brown........................  Village of Hobart (22- President Richard Heidel,       Village Hall, 2990 South Pine  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Dec. 19, 2022.........       550626
                                    05-0903P).             Village of Hobart, 2990 South   Tree Road, Hobart, WI 54155.   advanceSearch.
                                                           Pine Tree Road, Hobart, WI
                                                           54155.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2022-22131 Filed 10-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 17, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54802-54803]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19639]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9951-00-OGC; EPA-HQ-OGC-2016-0480]

Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed consent decree; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as
amended (``CAA'' or the ``Act''), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby
given of a proposed consent decree to address a lawsuit filed by
Concerned Citizens of Seneca County, Inc. and Dixie D. Lemmon,
(collectively ``Plaintiffs''): Concerned Citizens of Seneca County,
Inc. v. McCarthy, No. 6:16-cv-06196 (W.D.N.Y.). On March 25, 2016,
Plaintiffs filed the complaint in this case alleging that Gina
McCarthy, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA''), failed to perform a
non-discretionary duty to grant or deny within 60 days a petition
submitted by Plaintiffs. In their petition, Plaintiffs requested that
EPA object to a CAA Title V permit issued by the New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation to the Seneca County Landfill
Gas-to-Energy Facility, for purposes of operating a landfill gas-to-
energy facility in Seneca Falls, New York. The proposed consent decree
would establish a deadline for EPA to respond to this petition.

DATES: Written comments on the proposed consent decree must be received
by September 16, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OGC-2016-0480, online at www.regulations.gov (EPA's preferred method);
by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>by mail to EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; or by hand delivery or courier to
EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. Comments on a disk or CD-ROM should be
formatted in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use of special characters
and any form of encryption, and may be mailed to the mailing address
above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zachary Pilchen, Air and Radiation Law
Office (2344A), Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW. Washington, DC 20460;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Additional Information About the Proposed Consent Decree

    This proposed consent decree would resolve a lawsuit filed by
Plaintiffs seeking to compel the Administrator to take actions under
CAA section 505(b)(2). Under the terms of the proposed consent decree,
EPA would agree to sign a response to the petition by December 9, 2016.
The proposed consent decree also provides for the possibility that
certain circumstances could delay compliance with the December 9, 2016
deadline, and provides a framework for extending that deadline. In
addition, the proposed consent decree also establishes a framework for
resolving any request for costs of litigation, including attorney fees,
and provides that after such resolution the proposed consent decree
will be terminated and the case dismissed.
    For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, the Agency will accept written comments relating to the
proposed consent decree from persons who are not named as parties or
intervenors to the litigation in question. EPA or the Department of
Justice may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed consent decree
if the comments disclose facts or considerations that indicate that
such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent
with the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the Department of
Justice determines that consent to this consent decree should be
withdrawn or withheld, the terms of the consent decree will be
affirmed.

II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Consent
Decree

A. How can I get a copy of the proposed consent decree?

    The official public docket for this action (identified by Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2016-0480) contains a copy of the proposed consent
decree. The official public docket is available for public viewing at
the Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket
Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the OEI Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    An electronic version of the public docket is available through
www.regulations.gov. You may use the www.regulations.gov to submit or
view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the
official public docket, and access those documents in the public docket
that are available electronically. Once in the system, key in the
appropriate docket identification number then select ``search.''
    It is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments,
whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available
for public viewing online at www.regulations.gov without change, unless
the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information claimed as CBI
and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute is not
included in the official public docket or in the electronic public
docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material, including
copyrighted material contained in a public comment, will not be placed
in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public docket. Although not all
docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access
any of the publicly available docket materials through the EPA Docket
Center.

B. How and to whom do I submit comments?

    You may submit comments as provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late
comments.
    If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD
ROM you submit. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. Any identifying or
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA's electronic

public docket. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
    Use of the www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. The
electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, email address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's electronic mail
(email) system is not an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send an
email comment directly to the Docket without going through
www.regulations.gov, your email address is automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket.

    Dated: August 10, 2016.
Lorie J. Schmidt,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2016-19639 Filed 8-16-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 192 (Monday, October 5, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60040-60043]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25161]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0510; FRL-9934-04-Region 9]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Antelope
Valley Air Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve revisions to the Antelope Valley Air Quality
Management District (AVAQMD) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions largely concern volatile
organic compound (VOC) emissions from graphic arts facilities and
aerospace assembly and coating operations. We are approving local rules
that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or
the Act). These revisions also address rescission of two rules no
longer required, and administrative revisions to the emergency episode
plan requirements.

DATES: This rule is effective on December 4, 2015 without further
notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by November 4, 2015.
If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will
not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number [EPA-R09-OAR-
2015-0510, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you
consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as
such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and the EPA will
not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in
the body of your comment. If you send email directly to the EPA, your
email address will be automatically captured and included as part of
the public comment. If the EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, the
EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should
avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be
free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-3901.
While all documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be
publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanessa Graham, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4120<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rules did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of these rules?
    C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules and rule
revisions?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
    B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve These Rules
    D. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rules did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the rules addressed by this action with the dates
that they were amended or rescinded by AVAQMD and submitted by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB). Table 2 provides Federal
Register dates and citations for when the EPA approved into the SIP the
two rules that are now being rescinded.

                                            Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Local agency                Rule No.          Rule title          Rescinded    Amended    Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AVAQMD................................         701  Air Pollution Emergency   ..........    04/15/14    11/06/14
                                                     Contingency Actions.
AVAQMD................................        1110  Emissions from              01/15/13  ..........    05/13/14
                                                     Stationary Internal
                                                     Combustion Engines
                                                     (Demonstration).
AVAQMD................................        1124  Aerospace Assembly and    ..........    08/20/13    05/13/14
                                                     Component Manufacturing
                                                     Operations.
AVAQMD................................        1128  Paper, Fabric and Film      11/19/13  ..........    05/13/14
                                                     Coating Operations.
AVAQMD................................        1130  Graphic Arts............  ..........    11/19/13    05/13/14
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                         Table 2--Rules To Be Rescinded
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                SIP Approval
           Local agency                Rule No.              Rule title                date         FR Citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCAQMD............................            1110  Emissions from Stationary         05/03/1984     49 FR 18822
                                                     Internal Combustion Engines
                                                     (Demonstration).
SCAQMD............................            1128  Paper, Fabric and Film            12/20/1993     58 FR 66286
                                                     Coating Operations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On June 18, 2014, the EPA determined that the submittal for AVAQMD
Rules 1110, 1124, 1128 and 1130 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR
part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review. On
December 18, 2014, the EPA determined that the submittal for AVAQMD
Rule 701 met the completeness criteria as well.

B. Are there other versions of these rules?

    We approved earlier versions of Rules 701, 1124, 1130, 1110 and
1128 into the SIP on March 7, 2003 (68 FR 10966), May 6, 1996 (61 FR
20136), October 31, 1995 (60 FR 55312), May 3, 1984 (49 FR 18822) and
December 20, 1993 (58 FR 66286) respectively.

C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules and rule revisions?

    VOCs help produce ground-level ozone and smog that can harm human
health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States
to submit regulations that control VOC emissions.
    Rule 701 is intended to fulfill requirements for emergency episode
plans described in CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (a)(2). The proposed
amendments to Rule 701 are mainly administrative in nature. In
addition, the episode criteria for PM was adjusted.
    AVAQMD rescinded Rule 1110 because the demonstration program
adopted from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
prior to the formation of the AVAQMD is no longer in use. The EPA
previously approved SCAQMD's rescission of Rule 1110 from the SCAQMD
portion of the SIP on July 14, 2014 (79 FR 40675). We are now similarly
rescinding the rule from the AVAQMD portion of the SIP. We are also
amending the language at 40 CFR part 52 Subpart F to clarify that our
earlier approval applied only to the SCAQMD portion of the SIP.
    Rule 1124 limits VOC emissions from aerospace primers, coatings,
adhesives, maskants and lubricants and from cleaning, stripping,
storage and disposal of organic solvents and waste materials associated
with the use of the above mentioned aerospace material categories.
    AVAQMD rescinded Rule 1128 and incorporated all substantive
requirements of this Rule into the amended version of AVAQMD Rule 1130,
which we are approving in this action. The rescission of the AVAQMD
portion of SCAQMD Rule 1128 shall have no effect on SCAQMD Rule 1128
currently approved in the South Coast portion of the SIP.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ SCAQMD Rule 1128 was originally developed as part of the
SCAQMD's program to control volatile organic compounds (VOC). At the
time the rule was adopted, the area controlled by the SCAQMD
included the portion of Los Angeles County located in the Mojave
Desert Air Basin, known as the Antelope Valley. In 1997, the
Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control District (AVAPCD) was formed
pursuant to statute, and assumed the duties and powers of the SCAQMD
in the Antelope Valley. AVAQMD was created to replace AVAPCD in
2002.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 1130 limits VOC emissions from graphic arts processes, largely
by establishing work practice requirements and limiting the amount of
VOC in graphic arts coatings, inks and solvents. The amendments to Rule
1130 were submitted to satisfy Reasonably Available Control Technology
(RACT) requirements under CAA sections 172(c)(1) and 182(b).
    The EPA's technical support documents (TSD) have more information
about these rules.

II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?

    SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not
interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section
110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in
nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions
reductions (see CAA section 193).
    AVAQMD regulates an ozone nonattainment area classified as severe
under both the 1997 and 2008 eight-hour ozone NAAQS. 40 CFR 81.305. CAA
section 172(c)(1) requires nonattainment areas to implement all
reasonably available control measures (RACM), including such reductions
in emissions from existing sources in the area as may be obtained
through the adoption, at a minimum, of RACT, as expeditiously as
practicable. Additional control measures for graphic arts processes may
be required pursuant to CAA section 172(c)(1) if both: (1) Additional
measures are reasonably available; and (2) these additional reasonably
available measures will advance attainment of one or more ozone
standards in the area or contribute to reasonable further progress
(RFP) when considered collectively (see 80 FR 12264, 12282). In
addition, SIP rules must require RACT for each category of sources
covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document as well as
each VOC major source in ozone nonattainment areas classified as
moderate or above (see CAA section 182(b)(2)). Since Rules 1124 and
1130 regulate sources subject to a CTG in a severe nonattainment area,
they must implement RACT. RACT is not required of Rules 701, 1110 and
1128 as discussed in the TSDs.
    Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate
enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements
for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following:
    1. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and
Deviations'' (``the Bluebook,'' U.S. EPA, May 25, 1988; revised January
11, 1990).
    2. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies'' (``the Little Bluebook'', EPA Region 9, August 21,
2001).
    3. ``Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) for Offset Lithographic
Printing and Letterpress Printing'', September 2006 (EPA 453/R-06-002).
    4. ``Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) for Flexible Package
Printing'', September 2006 (EPA 453/R-06-003).
    5. ``Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) for Paper, Film, and Foil
Coatings'', September 2007 (EPA 453/R-07-003).
    6. ``Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP)
Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2); USEPA
Memorandum dated September 13, 2013.
    7. 40 CFR part 51, subpart H--Prevention of Air Pollution Emergency
Episodes.

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?

    We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and
guidance regarding enforceability, RACT, and SIP relaxations. The TSDs
have more information on our evaluation.

C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve These Rules

    The TSDs describe additional rule revisions that we recommend for
the next time the local agency modifies Rules 701, 1124 and 1130, but
are not currently the basis for rule disapproval.

D. Public Comment and Final Action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving the submitted Rules 701, 1124 and 1130 because we believe
they fulfill all relevant requirements. We are also approving
rescission of Rules 1110 and 1128. We do not think anyone will object
to this approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in
advance. However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal
Register, we are simultaneously proposing approval of the same
submitted action. If we receive adverse comments by November 4, 2015,
we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify
the public that the direct final approval will not take effect and we
will address the comments in a subsequent final action based on the
proposal. If we do not receive timely adverse comments, the direct
final approval will be effective without further notice on December 4,
2015. This will incorporate AVAQMD Rules 701, 1124 and 1130 into the
federally enforceable SIP and remove the Antelope Valley portion of the
SCAQMD Rules 1110 and 1128 from the federally enforceable SIP.
    Please note that if the EPA receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final
those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse
comment.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
AVAQMD rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
available electronically through www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble for more information).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 4, 2015. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed
Rules section of this Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that the EPA
can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: September 1, 2015.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (c)(121)(i)(E); and
0
b. Adding paragraphs (c)(121)(i)(F), (c)(189)(i)(A)(9), (c)(441)(i)(E),
and (c)(457)(i)(F).
    The revision and additions read as follows:

Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (121) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (E) Previously approved on May 3, 1984 in paragraph (c)(121)(i)(C)
of this section and now deleted without replacement for implementation
in the South Coast Air Quality Management District, Rule 1110.
    (F) Previously approved on May 3, 1984 in paragraph (c)(121)(i)(C)
of this section and now deleted without replacement for implementation
in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District, Rule 1110.
* * * * *
    (189) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (9) Previously approved on December 20, 1993 in paragraph
(c)(189)(i)(A)(3) of this section and now deleted without replacement
for implementation in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management
District, Rule 1128.
* * * * *
    (441) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (E) Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District.
    (1) Rule 1124, ``Aerospace Assembly and Component Manufacturing
Operations,'' amended on August 20, 2013.
    (2) Rule 1130, ``Graphic Arts,'' amended on November 19, 2013.
* * * * *
    (457) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (F) Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District.
    (1) Rule 701, ``Air Pollution Emergency Contingency Actions,''
amended on April 15, 2014.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-25161 Filed 10-2-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Lisaa Jones 12/ 11/ 2003 03: 10 PM To: pbeverly@ omb. eop. gov cc: Paul Lapsley/ DC/ USEPA/ US@ EPA, Jane Stewart Yeager/ DC/ USEPA/ US@ EPA, Joan Crawford/ DC/ USEPA/ US@ EPA, Sue Stendebach/ DC/ USEPA/ US@ EPA, Eileen Pritchard/ DC/ USEPA/ US@ EPA, Anna Duncan/ DC/ USEPA/ US@ EPA, Stephanie Daigle/ DC/ USEPA/ US@ EPA, Alexander Cristofaro/ DC/ USEPA/ US@ EPA Subject: SUBMITTING EPA'S OAR RULE: SAN 4794, RIN 2060 AL76 FOR OMB REVIEW To the OMB Docket Librarian: I am attaching for official OMB review, a file containing EPA's OAR rule, SAN 4794; RIN 2060 AL76: Rule to Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone ( Interstate Air Quality Rule). This rule is a Notice of a Proposed Rulemaking. I will also fax a copy of the signed 12866 form.

Lisa Ashley Jones Phone: ( 202) 564 6198 Fax: ( 202) 501 0661