[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29308-29309]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10353]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0105; FRL-9863-01-OMS]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Semiconductor Manufacturing
(Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), NESHAP for Semiconductor
Manufacturing (EPA ICR Number 2042.08, OMB Control Number 2060-0519),
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. This is a proposed
extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through May 31, 2022.
Public comments were previously requested, via the Federal Register (86
FR 19256), on April 13, 2021 during a 60-day comment period. This
notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller
description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated burden
and cost to the public. An agency may neither conduct nor sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before June 13, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OAR-2021-0105, online using https://www.regulations.gov/ (our preferred
method), by email to [email protected], or by mail to: EPA Docket
Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460. EPA's policy is that all
comments received will be included in the public docket without change
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes profanity, threats, information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI), or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
    Submit written comments and recommendations to OMB for the proposed
information collection within 30 days of publication of this notice to
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information
collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--Open for
Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Muntasir Ali, Sector Policies and
Program Division (D243-05), Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina, 27711; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available
in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC
West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC.
The telephone number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For
additional information about EPA's public docket, visit: http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Semiconductor Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63,
subpart BBBBB) were proposed on May 8, 2002; and promulgated on May 22,
2003. These regulations apply to both existing facilities and new
facilities that either emits, or has the potential to emit, considering
controls, in the aggregate, any single hazardous air pollutants (HAP)
at a rate of 10 tons per year (tpy) or more or any combination of HAP
at a rate of 25 tpy or more. New facilities include those that either
commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction after the date
of proposal. This information is being collected to assure compliance
with 40 CFR part 63, subpart BBBBB.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Semiconductor manufacturing
facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart BBBBB).
    Estimated number of respondents: Approximately one (total).
    Frequency of response: Semiannually.
    Total estimated burden: 41 hours (per year). Burden is defined at 5
CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $5,450 (per year), which includes $550 in
annualized capital/startup and/or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is no change in burden from the
most-recently approved ICR as currently identified in the OMB Inventory
of Approved Burdens. This is due to two considerations: (1) The
regulations have

not changed over the past three years and are not anticipated to change
over the next three years; and (2) the growth rate for this industry is
very low or non-existent, so there is no significant change in the
overall burden. Since there are no changes in the regulatory
requirements and there is no significant industry growth, there are
also no changes in the capital/startup or operation and maintenance
(O&M) costs.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-10353 Filed 5-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 28639]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13207]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR18-9-000]

White Cliffs Pipeline, L.L.C.; Notice of Designation of
Commission Staff as Non-Decisional

    With respect to the proceedings pending before the Commission in
the above-captioned docket, Dr. Emma Nicholson from the Office of
Energy Policy and Innovation is designated as non-decisional in
deliberations by the Commission in this docket. Accordingly, pursuant
to 18 CFR 385.2202 (2017), as non-decisional staff, Dr. Nicholson will
not participate in an advisory capacity in the Commission's review of
any future filings in the above-referenced docket, including offers of
settlement or settlement agreements. Likewise, pursuant to 18 CFR
385.2201 (2017), Dr. Nicholson is prohibited from communicating with
advisory staff concerning any deliberations in these dockets.

    Dated: June 14, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-13207 Filed 6-19-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 150 (Thursday, August 4, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47076-47077]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19384]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0429; FRL-9444-3]

Revision to the California State Implementation Plan, San Joaquin
Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of a revision to the San Joaquin
Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision was proposed
in the Federal Register on June 8, 2011 and concerns volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from brandy and wine aging operations. We are
approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the
Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on September 6, 2011.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0429 for
this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed at http://www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi-volume
reports), and some may not be available in either location (e.g.,
confidential business information (CBI)). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours
with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine Vineyard, EPA Region IX,
(415)<PHONE_NUMBER>5<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action

    On June 8, 2011 (76 FR 33181), EPA proposed to approve the
following rule into the California SIP.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Local agency                   Rule No.             Rule title             Adopted     Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SJVUAPCD..................................         4695  Brandy Aging and Wine Aging       09/17/09     05/17/10
                                                          Operations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We proposed to approve this rule because we determined that it
complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rule and our evaluation.

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no comments.

III. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted that change our assessment that the
submitted rule complies with the relevant CAA requirements. Therefore,
as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving
this rule into the California SIP.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:

     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 3, 2011. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: July 18, 2011.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(379)(i)(C)(2) to
read as follows:

Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (379) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (C) * * *
    (2) Rule 4695, ``Brandy Aging and Wine Aging Operations'' adopted
on September 17, 2010.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-19384 Filed 8-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-60-P


[Federal Register: July 16, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 135)]
[Notices]
[Page 34565]
[DOCID:fr16jy09-38]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13485-000]

FFP Project 75, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Competing Applications

July 9, 2009.

    On May 22, 2009, FFP Project 75, LLC filed an application for a
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act,
proposing to study the feasibility of the Old Town Bend Hydrokinetic
Project, to be located on the Mississippi River, in Phillips County,
Arkansas and Coahoma County, Mississippi.
    The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant
the permit holder priority to file a license application during the
permit term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder
to perform any land disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands
or waters owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed Old Town Bend Hydrokinetic Project consists of: (1)
3,358 proposed 40 kilowatt Free Flow generating units having a total
installed capacity of 134.32 megawatts; (2) a 4.3-mile-long, 69
kilovolt transmission line; and (3) appurtenant facilities. The
proposed Old Town Bend Hydrokinetic Project would have an average
annual generation of 588 gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Ramya Swaminathan, Vice President of
Development, Free Flow Power Corporation, 33 Commercial Street,
Gloucester, MA 01930; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Kim Carter,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's website
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically,
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to
the Commission's Web site located at http:[sol][sol]www.ferc.gov/
filing-comments.asp. More information about this project, including a
copy of the application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary''
link of Commission's Web site at http:[sol][sol]www.ferc.gov/docs-
filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-13485) in the docket
number field to access the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-
866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-16850 Filed 7-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: April 16, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 72)]
[Notices]
[Page 18982]
[DOCID:fr16ap07-71]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ZZ07-4-000]

RTO/ISO MMU State of the Markets Reports; Notice of Electronic
Filing Guidelines for RTO/ISO Market Monitoring Unit State of the
Markets Reports

April 10, 2007.
    Take notice that the Commission is issuing guidelines for the
submission of the state of the markets reports that may be filed
electronically with the Commission by RTO/ISO Market Monitoring Units
according to the provisions of their tariff. The Commission has created
a special docket number, ZZ07-4-000, under which all of the reports for
Fiscal Year 2007, ending September 30, 2007, should be filed.
    The Commission's electronic filing system can be accessed on its
Web site at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/docs-filing.asp. An

eRegistration account is required for all persons logging in to the
system and for persons who will be listed as a primary contact or
person responsible for the filing. At the present time, only public
information can be submitted via the eFiling system. The Commission
prefers filings in text-searchable formats.
    The electronic filing guidelines attached to this notice will also
be available on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/help/how-to.asp
 and updated as necessary.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.

Electronic Filing Guidelines for RTO/ISO Market Monitoring Unit State
of the Markets Reports

    The Commission's electronic filing system can be accessed on its
Web site at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/docs-filing.asp. A FERC

Online eRegistration account is required for all persons logging in to
the eFiling system and for persons who will be listed as a primary
contact or person responsible for the filing. At the present time, only
public information can be submitted via the eFiling system.
    The Commission prefers filings in text-searchable formats. Our
standard word processing application is MS Word, but the eFiling system
can also accept documents in WordPerfect and PDF formats.
    1. The header of the document should contain ZZ07-4-000 and the
title RTO/ISO Market Monitoring Report.
    2. Select the filing type ``Production of Document''.
    3. On the Select Docket screen, enter ZZ07-4 in the docket number
search block and select ZZ07-4-000 from the search results.
    4. Before you browse, select, and attach the file(s) make sure that
the file name is less than 25 characters and contains no spaces or
special characters. There is a maximum number of 10 files per session
and no file should be larger than 10 Mb.
    5. On the Submission Description Screen, edit the default
description be replacing ``Production of Document: with ``RTO ISO
Market Monitoring Report'' or other suitable description.
    6. For any amendment or correction to a prior submission add
``Correction to'', ``Supplement to'', or other appropriate indicator to
the edited description of the filing.
    7. Upon receipt, the eFiling system will send a Confirmation of
Receipt email to the e-mail address for the log in account.
    RTO/ISO Market Monitoring Report submissions will be stored in
eLibrary in the ``Electric'' library with Class = Other Submittal, Type
= Other External Submittal, and the docket number ZZ07-4-000.
[FR Doc. E7-7172 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 175 (Friday, September 9, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 62365]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21774]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket No. USCG-2016-0718]

Special Local Regulations; Cumberland River Dragon Boat Festival,
Cumberland River, Nashville, TN

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce a special local regulation for
the ``Cumberland River Dragon Boat Festival'' on the Cumberland River
from mile marker 190.0 to mile marker 192.0 on September 10, 2016, to
provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters during the
Cumberland River Dragon Boat Festival. Our regulation for Recurring
Marine Events in Captain of the Port Ohio Valley Zone identifies the
regulated area for this event. During the enforcement period, no vessel
may enter into, transit through or anchor in the regulated area unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) Ohio Valley
or a designated representative.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 100.801, Table 1, no. 34, will be
enforced from 5 a.m. until 5 p.m., on September 10, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notice of enforcement, call or email Petty Officer Ashley Schad, Coast
Guard Marine Safety Detachment Nashville at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the special
local regulations in 33 CFR 100.801, Table 1, no. 34 from 5 a.m. until
5 p.m. on September 10, 2016, for the ``Cumberland Dragon Boat
Festival'' on the Cumberland River between mile markers 190.0 and
192.0. This action is being taken to provide for the safety of life on
navigable waterways during the event. Our regulation for Recurring
Marine Events in Captain of the Port Ohio Valley Zone, Sec.  100.801,
Table 1, no. 34 specifies the location of the regulated area for this 2
mile bank to bank course. As provided in Sec.  100.801, during the
enforcement period, no vessel may transit this regulated area without
approval from the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley (COTP) or a COTP
designated representative.
    This notice of enforcement is issued under authority of 5 U.S.C.
552(a), and 33 U.S.C. 1233. In addition to this notice of enforcement
in the Federal Register, the Coast Guard will provide the maritime
community with advance notification of this enforcement period via
Local Notice to Mariners and Marine Information Broadcasts.

    Dated: September 6, 2016.
M.B. Zamperini,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2016-21774 Filed 9-8-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: November 7, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 214)]
[Notices]
[Page 67470]
[DOCID:fr07no05-72]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-55-000]

Young Gas Storage Company, Ltd; Notice of Operational Purchases/
Sales Annual Report

November 1, 2005.
    Take notice that on October 28, 2005, Young Gas Storage Company,
Ltd tendered for filing its annual report of operational purchases and
sales in accordance with section 29.3 of the general terms and
conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated
below. Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or
protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve
motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on November 8, 2005.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E5-6167 Filed 11-4-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 112 (Wednesday, June 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33605-33607]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13556]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-72326; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2014-49]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending the NYSE MKT
BBO Market Data Product Offering

June 5, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on May 23, 2014 NYSE MKT LLC (the ``Exchange'' or ``NYSE
MKT'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s (b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE MKT BBO market data product
offering. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE MKT BBO market data product
offering. In 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') approved the NYSE MKT BBO data feed and certain fees
for it.\4\ NYSE MKT BBO is an NYSE MKT-only market data feed that
distributes on a real-time basis the same best-bid-and-offer
information that the Exchange reports under the Consolidated Quotation
(``CQ'') Plan for inclusion in the CQ Plan's consolidated quotation
information data stream. The data feed includes the best bids and
offers for all securities that are traded on the Exchange and for which
the Exchange reports quotes under the CQ Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62187 (May 27,
2010), 75 FR 31500 (June 3, 2010) (SR-NYSEAmex-2010-35).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has determined to add information about security
status, such as whether a security is in a short sale restriction or
retail price improvement indications pursuant to NYSE MKT Rule
107C(j)--Equities, to the NYSE MKT BBO data feed. There will be no
change to the fees for the NYSE MKT BBO feed in connection with this
change.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ When the security status information is added, NYSE MKT BBO
also will be distributed in a new format, Exchange Data Protocol
(``XDP''). The feed will also include a symbol index mapping message
that will be sent once a day. These two changes do not affect the
real-time data content that is distributed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange expects to offer the current NYSE MKT BBO data product
and the proposed NYSE MKT BBO data product with the added security
status information at the same time for a limited transition period.
After the transition period, the Exchange will offer only the proposed
NYSE MKT BBO with the added security status

information. The Exchange will announce the transition dates in
advance.
2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) \6\ of the
Act, in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) \7\ of
the Act, in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest, and it is not designed to permit unfair discrimination
among customers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that including the additional information in
NYSE MKT BBO will provide vendors and subscribers with a more
comprehensive and higher quality market data product. The NYSE MKT BBO
data feed will help to protect a free and open market by providing
vendors and subscribers with additional choices in receiving
proprietary market data, thus promoting competition and innovation. The
Exchange believes that NYSE MKT BBO offers an alternative to
consolidated data products and proprietary data products offered by
other exchanges.\8\ In addition, the proposal would not permit unfair
discrimination because the product will be available to all of the
Exchange's market data vendors and customers on an equivalent basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ For example, NASDAQ Basic includes market status information
including Stock Directory, Emergency Market Condition event
messages, System Status and Trading Halt information for NASDAQ,
NYSE, NYSE MKT, NYSE Arca and other regional exchange listed issues.
See NASDAQ Rule 7047 and http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=NASDAQBasic.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In adopting Regulation NMS, the Commission granted self-regulatory
organizations (``SROs'') and broker-dealers increased authority and
flexibility to offer new and unique market data to consumers of such
data. It was believed that this authority would expand the amount of
data available to users and consumers of such data and also spur
innovation and competition for the provision of market data. The
Exchange believes that the data products proposed herein are precisely
the sort of market data products that the Commission envisioned when it
adopted Regulation NMS. The Commission concluded that Regulation NMS--
by lessening regulation of the market in proprietary data--would itself
further the Act's goals of facilitating efficiency and competition:

[E]fficiency is promoted when broker-dealers who do not need the
data beyond the prices, sizes, market center identifications of the
NBBO and consolidated last sale information are not required to
receive (and pay for) such data. The Commission also believes that
efficiency is promoted when broker-dealers may choose to receive
(and pay for) additional market data based on their own internal
analysis of the need for such data.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496 (June 29, 2005) (File No. S7-10-04).

    By removing ``unnecessary regulatory restrictions'' on the ability
of exchanges to sell their own data, Regulation NMS advanced the goals
of the Act and the principles reflected in its legislative history. The
Exchange believes that offering NYSE MKT BBO with the additional
information reflects innovation in its product offerings and promotes
competition for the provision of market data. The existence of
alternatives to the Exchange's products, including real-time
consolidated data and proprietary data from other exchanges, ensures
that the Exchange is not unreasonably discriminatory because vendors
and subscribers can elect these alternatives.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The market for proprietary
data products is currently competitive and inherently contestable
because there is fierce competition for the inputs necessary to the
creation of proprietary data. Numerous exchanges compete with each
other for listings, trades, and market data itself, providing virtually
limitless opportunities for entrepreneurs who wish to produce and
distribute their own market data. This proprietary data is produced by
each individual exchange, as well as other entities (such as
internalizing broker-dealers and various forms of alternative trading
systems, including dark pools and electronic communication networks),
in a vigorously competitive market. NYSE MKT BBO offers an alternative
to similar products offered by other exchanges,\10\ thus promoting
competition. The existence of numerous alternatives to the Exchange's
products, including real-time consolidated data and proprietary data
from other sources, subjects the Exchange to vigorous competition.
Vendors and subscribers are free to elect these alternatives, purchase
some or all of the underlying data feeds, or choose not to purchase a
specific proprietary data product at all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See supra note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\12\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, provided that the self-regulatory
organization has given the Commission written notice of its intent to
file the proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the
date of filing of the proposed rule change or such shorter time as
designated by the Commission,\13\ the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \13\ The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \14\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,

including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2014-49 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2014-49. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090, on official business days between the
hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be
available for Web site viewing and printing at the NYSE's principal
office and on its Internet Web site at www.nyse.com. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2014-49 and should
be submitted on or before July 2, 2014.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-13556 Filed 6-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: August 3, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 149)]
[Notices]
[Page 43268]
[DOCID:fr03au07-66]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP06-470-000; CP06-471-000; CP06-472-000; CP06-473-000;
CP06-474-000]

Southern LNG, Inc.; Elba Express Company, LLC; Southern Natural
Gas Company; Notice Accepting in Part and Rejecting in Part Landowner
Intervenors' Additional Filings in Support of Comments to the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Elba III Project

July 27, 2007.
    On July 12, 2007, Latha Anderson, et al., and certain Landowner
Intervenors (Intervenors) submitted six DVDs in support of Intervenors'
Comments to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed
Elba III Project in the above referenced dockets.
    After receipt of the filing, the staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) has determined that the two
of the six DVDs (Comments to Draft Environmental Impact Statement
[previously submitted as Second Supplemental Comments on Draft EIS by
Landowner Intervenors] and ``photographs from individual property
owners) are acceptable submittals which will be considered in the Final
Environmental Impact Statement. However, the remaining four DVDs
(``Elbert, Wilkes, and McDuffie County USGS Topographic Maps'',
``Elbert, Wilkes, and McDuffie County Aerial Photographs'', ``Eastern
and Western Georgia Digital Elevation Models'', and ``GIS, Historical
Documents, and List of Property Owners and Parcel IDs'') are hereby
rejected for failure to comply with the Commission's Submission
Guidelines for CDs, DVDs, and Other Electronic Media (Guidelines),\1\
as outlined below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Guidelines appear online at: http://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide.asp
.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The data files on the DVDs include files that exceed the
50-MB limit per file;
     There are 7 unacceptable file types submitted
(constituting over 60 files) which prohibit both FERC staff and the
public from viewing the DVDs; and
     There are 18 file names which contain more than one period
in the name (a double file extension).
    Accordingly, the four specified DVDs of Intervenors' July 12, 2007
submission to the Commission are hereby rejected without prejudice to
Intervenors' resubmitting this portion of its filing in accordance with
the Guidelines.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-15076 Filed 8-2-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 150 (Tuesday, August 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 45583]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18469]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending July 19, 2014

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers,
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2014-0121.
    Date Filed: July 16, 2014.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify
Scope: August 6, 2014.
    Description: Application of Frontier Airlines, Inc. (``Frontier'')
requesting a certificate of public convenience and necessity
authorizing it to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of
persons, property and mail between (1) Washington, DC and Cancun,
Mexico, (2) Washington, DC and Nassau, Bahamas, and (3) Trenton, New
Jersey and Nassau, Bahamas. Frontier also requests a designation to
operate in the Washington, DC-Cancun, Mexico market.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Federal Register
Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2014-18469 Filed 8-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 28 (Friday, February 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 9414]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02958]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-36, OMB Control No. 3235-0028]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

Extension:
    Rule 17f-2(d)

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of the
previously approved collection of information provided for in Rule 17f-
2(d) (17 CFR 240.17f-2(d)), under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
    Rule 17f-2(d) requires that records created pursuant to the
fingerprinting requirements of Section 17(f)(2) of the Act be
maintained and preserved by every member of a national securities
exchange, broker, dealer, registered transfer agent and registered
clearing agency (``covered entities'' or ``respondents''); permits,
under certain circumstances, the records required to be maintained and
preserved by a member of a national securities exchange, broker, or
dealer to be maintained and preserved by a self-regulatory organization
that is also the designated examining authority for that member, broker
or dealer; and permits the required records to be preserved on
microfilm. The general purpose of Rule 17f-2 is to: (i) Identify
security risk personnel; (ii) provide criminal record information so
that employers can make fully informed employment decisions; and (iii)
deter persons with criminal records from seeking employment or
association with covered entities. The rule enables the Commission or
other examining authority to ascertain whether all covered persons are
being fingerprinted and whether proper procedures regarding
fingerprinting are being followed. Retention of these records for a
period of not less than three years after termination of a covered
person's employment or relationship with a covered entity ensures that
law enforcement officials will have easy access to fingerprint cards on
a timely basis. This in turn acts as an effective deterrent to employee
misconduct.
    Approximately 3,900 respondents are subject to the recordkeeping
requirements of the rule. Each respondent maintains approximately 68
new records per year, each of which takes approximately 2 minutes per
record to maintain, for an annual burden of approximately 2.2666667
hours (68 records times 2 minutes). The total annual time burden for
all respondents is approximately 8,840 hours (3,900 respondents times
2.2666667 hours). As noted above, all records maintained subject to the
rule must be retained for a period of not less than three years after
termination of a covered person's employment or relationship with a
covered entity. In addition, we estimate the total annual cost burden
to respondents is approximately $39,000 in third party storage costs.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Find this
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice
to (i) www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and (ii) David Bottom,
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission,
c/o Cynthia Roscoe, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or by
sending an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: February 9, 2021.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-02958 Filed 2-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P