[Federal Register: January 13, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 8)]
[Notices]
[Page 1675-1678]
[DOCID:fr13ja09-39]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

January 6, 2009.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER97-324-013; ER97-3834-020.
    Applicants: The Detroit Edison Company, DTE Energy Trading, Inc.
    Description: DTE Entities submits revised tariff sheets in
compliance with the order issued 12/18/08.
    Filed Date: 12/22/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081229-0155.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, January 12, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER98-4289-006.
    Applicants: Montana-Dakota Utilities Company.
    Description: Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. submits the Updated
Market Power Analysis.
    Filed Date: 12/30/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090105-0008.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 2, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER99-845-014.
    Applicants: Puget Sound Energy, Inc.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Puget Sound Energy, Inc.
    Filed Date: 01/05/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090105-5107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, January 26, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER99-2948-016; ER00-2918-015; ER00-2917-015; ER05-
261-008; ER01-556-014; ER01-1654-017; ER02-2567-015; ER05-728-008;
ER04-485-012; ER07-247-007; ER07-245-007; ER07-244-007.
    Applicants: Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Constellation Power

Sources Generation, Inc., Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Inc.,
Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc., Handsome Lake Energy,
LLC, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC, Constellation NewEnergy,
Inc., Constellation Energy Commodities Group Maine, LLC, R.E. Ginna
Nuclear Power Plant, LLC, Raven One, LLC, Raven Two, LLC, Raven Three,
LLC.
    Description: Constellation MBR Entities forwards six public CD's
containing their joint triennial market power update for the Southeast
Region, and updated market power analysis in compliance with Order 697
etc.
    Filed Date: 12/30/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090102-0092.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 2, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER99-3665-010; ER02-1947-011, ER08-1354-004.
    Applicants: Occidental Power Marketing L.P., Occidental Power
Services, Inc., Occidental Chemical Corporation.
    Description: Occidental Sellers submits an updated market power
analysis for the Southeast region.
    Filed Date: 12/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090105-0004.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 2, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER00-38-008; ER00-1115-008; ER00-3562-008; ER06-
749-004; ER06-751-005; ER06-441-003; ER01-480-007; ER06-750-004; ER06-
752-004; ER07-1335-004.
    Applicants: Broad River Energy LLC, Calpine Construction Finance
Company, LP, Calpine Energy Services, L.P., Carville Energy, LLC,
Columbia Energy, LLC, Decatur Energy Center, LLC, Mobile Energy, LLC,
Morgan Energy Center, LLC, Pine Bluff Energy, LLC, Santa Rosa Energy
Center, LLC.
    Description: Broad River Energy LLC et al (Calpine Southeast MBR
Sellers) submits their joint triennial market power update to comply
with the Commission's directives in Order No 697-A etc.
    Filed Date: 12/30/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090102-0083.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 2, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER00-3080-004.
    Applicants: Otter Tail Power Company.
    Description: Otter Tail Power Company submits a Notice of Change in
Status etc.
    Filed Date: 12/30/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090102-0085.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER00-3412-008; ER00-816-006; ER04-53-009; ER04-8-
007; ER98-2440-007; ER98-3285-005; ER05-638-002; ER00-2687-010; ER05-
1482-003.
    Applicants: Ameren Energy Generating Company, Ameren Energy
Marketing Company, AmerenEnergy Resources Generating Company,
AmerenEnergy Medina Valley Cogen, L.L.C., Central Illinois Light
Company, Central Illinois Public Service Company, Illinois Power
Company, Union Electric Company, Electric Energy, Inc.
    Description: Ameren Services Company submits an updated market
power analysis.
    Filed Date: 12/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090102-0094.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 23, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER01-1403-010; ER06-1443-006; ER04-366-008; ER01-
2968-011; ER01-845-009; ER05-1122-007; ER08-107-004
    Applicants: FirstEnergy Operating Companies, Pennsylvania Power
Company, Jersey Central Power & Light Company, FirstEnergy Solutions
Corp., FirstEnergy Generation Corporation, FirstEnergy Nuclear
Generation Corporation, FirstEnergy Mansfield Unit 1 Corp.
    Description: The First Energy Operating Companies et al submits
Triennial Market Power Update Analysis for Markets in the Midwest ISO.
    Filed Date: 12/29/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090102-0040.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 27, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER01-1418-010; ER02-1238-010, ER03-28-004; ER03-
398-011.
    Applicants: Effingham County Power, LLC, MPC Generating, LLC,
Walton County Power, LLC, Washington County Power, LLC.
    Description: Effingham County Power, LLC submits Updated Market
Power Analysis; Application for Order Granting Revised Market-Based
Rate Authority and Certain Waivers and Blanket Approvals; and Order 697
Compliance Filing.
    Filed Date: 12/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090105-0005.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 2, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER01-2636-005.
    Applicants: ALLETE, Inc.
    Description: Minnesota Power submits its Triennial Market Power
Analysis requesting authority to sell energy, capacity and ancillary
services at market-based rates pursuant to FERC's 6/21/07 Order.
    Filed Date: 12/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090105-0103.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 2, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER02-237-012.
    Applicants: J. Aron & Company.
    Description: J. Aron & Company submits the Updated Market Power
Analysis.
    Filed Date: 12/30/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090102-0086.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 2, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER02-1572-006; ER02-1571-006; ER00-1259-008; ER00-
3718-007; ER97-4281-019.
    Applicants: Bayou Cove Peaking Power LLC, Big Cajun I Peaking Power
LLC, Louisiana Generating LLC, NRG Sterlington Power LLC, NRG Power
Marketing LLC.
    Description: Bayou Cove Peaking Power LLC et al submits Updated
Market Power Analysis.
    Filed Date: 12/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090105-0007.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 2, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER04-805-009.
    Applicants: Wabash Valley Power Association, Inc.
    Description: Wabash Valley Power submits Updated Market Power
Analysis.
    Filed Date: 12/30/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090102-0084.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 2, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1191-014.
    Applicants: Union Power Partners, LP.
    Description: Union Power Partners, LP submits an updated market
power analysis that supports its continued market-based rate
authorization pursuant to Orders 697 and 697A.
    Filed Date: 12/30/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090102-0088.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 2, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-549-002.
    Applicants: Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.
    Description: Wheelabrator Ridge Energy, Inc submits the regional
schedule set forth in Appendix D-2 of Order 697-A.
    Filed Date: 12/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090105-0018.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-744-004.
    Applicants: Sabine Cogen, LP.
    Description: Sabine Cogen, LP submits updated market power analysis
and compliance filing.
    Filed Date: 12/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090105-0021.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 2, 2009.
    Docket Numbers: ER06-771-002; ER06-772-002; ER06-773-002.

    Applicants: ExxonMobil Baton Rouge Complex, ExxonMobil Beaumont
Complex, ExxonMobil LaBarge Shute Creek Treating Facility.
    Description: Exxon Mobil Baton Rouge Complex et al submits their
revised Order No 697 Compliance Filing.
    Filed Date: 12/30/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090102-0087.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-1265-002; ER02-1336-005.
    Applicants: Orlando CoGen Limited, L.P., Vandolah Power Company,
L.L.C.
    Description: Pursuant to Order 697, Orlando CoGen Limited, LP et al
request a Notice of Change in Status, and Limited Request for
Privileged Treatment.
    Filed Date: 12/30/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090105-0101.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 2, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-396-003; EL08-31-001.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc submits revised tariff sheets for
the Rate Formula Template of its Open Access Transmission Tariff. FERC
Electric Tariff, Second Revised 5 in conformance with the Commission's
Designation etc.
    Filed Date: 12/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090105-0020.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-134-001; ER09-135-001; ER09-136-001; ER09-137-
001.
    Applicants: FirstEnergy Solutions Corp., FirstEnergy Generation
Corp., FirstEnergy Nuclear Generation Corp., FirstEnergy Mansfield Unit
1 Corp.
    Description: First Energy Solutions Corp et al submit amended
market based rate tariffs in accordance with the Commission's 12/23/08
order.
    Filed Date: 12/30/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090102-0013.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-481-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc, Kansas Gas and Electric Company
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc submits ministerial tariff
revisions to its Rate Formula Template to Westar's FERC Open Access
Transmission Tariff.
    Filed Date: 12/30/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090102-0012.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-482-000.
    Applicants: Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc submits
certain amendments to Golden Spread Eighth Revised Rate Schedule FERC
35 a long-term, bilateral Replacement Energy Agreement etc.
    Filed Date: 12/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090105-0024.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-483-000.
    Applicants: Northern States Power Company.
    Description: NSP Companies submits Notices of Cancellation of five
Short-Term Market-Based Electric Service Agreement and one Long-Term
Market-Based Electric Service Agreement among the NSP Companies and
various counterparties.
    Filed Date: 12/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090105-0023.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-484-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits amendments to
Schedule 12--Appendix of the PJM Tariff etc.
    Filed Date: 12/30/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090105-0019.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-485-000.
    Applicants: Electric Energy, Inc.
    Description: Electric Energy, Inc submits Modification 21 to a
Power Contract dated 9/2/87 between Electric Energy, Inc and the United
States Department of Energy etc.
    Filed Date: 12/30/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090105-0010.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-486-000.
    Applicants: Ashtabula Wind, LLC.
    Description: Ashtabula Wind, LLC submits jurisdictional service
agreement.
    Filed Date: 12/30/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090105-0022.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-487-000.
    Applicants: NAEA Energy Massachusetts, LLC.
    Description: NAEA Energy Massachusetts, LLC submits proposed
revisions of its two cost-of-service Reliability Must-Run Agreements
with ISO New England, Inc.
    Filed Date: 12/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090105-0009.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 21, 2009.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES07-36-002.
    Applicants: Entergy Texas, Inc.
    Description: Request of Entergy Texas, Inc., for Modification of
Order Issued Under Section 204(a).
    Filed Date: 01/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090102-5062.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 23, 2009.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following open access
transmission tariff filings:

    Docket Numbers: OA08-69-002.
    Applicants: Tucson Electric Power Company.
    Description: Tucson Electric Power Company submits Open Access
Transmission Tariff sheets.
    Filed Date: 12/30/2008.
    Accession Number: 20090102-0014.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 21, 2009.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's

eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the above list.
They are also available for review in the Commission's Public Reference
Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the Web site
that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document
is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call (866)
208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-486 Filed 1-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22282-22283]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08002]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket No. FRA-2020-0031]

Petition for Approval: Union Pacific Railroad

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of petition for approval to move to phase 2 of track
inspection test program.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides the public notice that on March 24,
2022, Union Pacific Railroad (UP) petitioned the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) to transition from phase 1 to phase 2 of a
previously approved test program and associated temporary suspension of
some visual track inspections. The Test Program is designed to test
track inspection technologies (i.e., an autonomous track geometry
measurement system) and new operational approaches to track inspections
(i.e., combinations of autonomous inspection and traditional visual
inspections).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yu-Jiang Zhang, Staff Director, Track
and Structures Division, Office of Railroad Safety, FRA, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or
email [email protected]; Aaron Moore, Attorney, Office of Chief
Counsel, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 28, 2020, FRA conditionally
approved the Test Program and UP's petition under 49 CFR 211.51 to
suspend Sec. Sec.  213.233(c) as applied to operations under the Test
Program. A copy of the Test Program, FRA's conditional approval of the
Test Program, and a previously published Federal Register notice
explaining FRA's rationale for approving the Test Program and related
suspension are available for review in the docket.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ https://www.regulations.gov/document/FRA-2020-0031-0001
(Test Program); https://www.regulations.gov/document/FRA-2020-0031-0002 (FRA's approval decision); https://www.regulations.gov/document/FRA-2020-0031-0005 (FRA's published notice of approval).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As approved, the Test Program included two separate phases over 12
months, as outlined in Exhibit C of the Program.\2\ Accordingly, UP
began the Test Program on June 15, 2020. Subsequently, UP requested,
and FRA approved, an extension of the Test Program until November 23,
2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ https://www.regulations.gov/document/FRA-2020-0031-0001.
_____________________________________-

    UP is requesting to transition from phase 1 to 2 on one of the Test
Program routes, the Sunset route. In support of its request, UP states
that it has met the Test Program conditions required to move to phase 2
and has achieved an average safety metric of 0.67 unprotected geometry
defects per 100 miles tested and 3.47 track inspector identified
geometry defects per month in phase 1 of the Test Program. UP is not
requesting to move to phase 2 on the SPCSL route.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, if any, are available for review online at
www.regulations.gov.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
     Website: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
    Communications received by May 16, 2022 will be considered by FRA
before final action is taken. Comments received after that date will be
considered if practicable. Anyone can search the electronic form of any
written communications and comments received into any of our dockets by
the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the
document, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). Under 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the
public to better inform its processes. DOT posts these comments,
without edit, including any personal information the commenter
provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. See also https://www.regulations.gov/privacy-notice for the privacy notice of regulations.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
John Karl Alexy,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety, Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-08002 Filed 4-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5681-5682]
[FR Doc No: 2020-01898]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4420-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]

Nebraska; Amendment No. 13 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for State of Nebraska (FEMA-4420-DR), dated March 21, 2019, and related
determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on December 20, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, DuWayne Tewes,
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for
this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Constance C. Johnson-Cage
as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance

(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation
Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-01898 Filed 1-30-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28678-28681]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13163]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-83435; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2018-042]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend the Exchange's Transaction Fees at Rule 7014(j) and Rule 7018(a)

June 14, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on May 31, 2018, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's transaction fees at
Rule 7014(j) and Rule 7018(a), as described below. While these
amendments are effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated the
proposed amendments to be operative on June 1, 2018.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the

places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is proposing to: (i) Eliminate a credit that it
provides to members for displayed liquidity under Rule 7018(a); and
(ii) re-establish a tier in the Nasdaq Growth Program under Rule
7014(j).
First Change
    Currently, the Exchange provides a credit of $ 0.00305 per share
executed to a member for displayed quotes/orders (other than
Supplemental Orders or Designated Retail Orders) that provide liquidity
if the member has: (i) Shares of liquidity provided in all securities
during the month representing at least 0.15% of Consolidated Volume \3\
during the month, through one or more of its Nasdaq Market Center
Market Participant Identifiers; and (ii) adds Nasdaq Options Market
(``NOM'') Market Maker liquidity in Penny Pilot Options and/or Non-
Penny Pilot Options of 0.90% or more of total industry average daily
volume in the customer clearing range for Equity and Exchange Traded
Fund option contracts per day in a month on NOM. The Exchange provides
the credit with the same criteria to securities of all three Tapes \4\
under Rule 7018(a)(1)-(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ As used in Rule 7018(a), the term ``Consolidated Volume''
means the total consolidated volume reported to all consolidated
transaction reporting plans by all exchanges and trade reporting
facilities during a month in equity securities, excluding executed
orders with a size of less than one round lot.
    \4\ There are three Tapes, which are based on the listing venue
of the security: Tape C securities are Nasdaq-listed; Tape A
securities are New York Stock Exchange-listed; and Tape B securities
are listed on exchanges other than Nasdaq and NYSE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange offers these credits as a means of improving market
quality by providing its members with an incentive to increase their
provision of liquidity on both the Exchange and NOM. However, the
Exchange has observed over time that these credits are not serving
their intended purpose. Indeed, no members presently qualify for
receipt of the credits. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to eliminate
them.
Second Change
    The Exchange is proposing to revive, under Rule 7014(j), a portion
of the Nasdaq Growth Program that it previously eliminated.
    Nasdaq introduced the Growth Program in 2016.\5\ The purpose of the
Growth Program is to provide a credit per share executed for members
that meet certain growth criteria. The credit is designed to provide an
incentive to members that do not qualify for other credits under Rule
7018 in excess of the Growth Program credit to increase their
participation on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78977 (September 29,
2016), 81 FR 69140 (October 5, 2016) (SR-NASDAQ-2016-132).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Presently, the Growth Program provides a member with a $0.0027 per
share executed credit in securities priced $1 or more per share. The
credit is provided in lieu of other credits provided to the member for
displayed quotes/orders (other than Supplemental Orders or Designated
Retail Orders) that provide liquidity under Rule 7018, if the credit
under the Growth Program is greater than the credit attained under Rule
7018.
    Until late 2017, the Growth Program also included a second credit
tier.\6\ That is, it provided a member with either a $0.0027 per share
executed credit in securities priced $1 or more per share, or a $0.0025
per share executed credit in securities priced at $1 or more, if the
member met certain criteria. Again, these credit [sic] were provided in
lieu of other credits provided to the member for displayed quotes/
orders (other than Supplemental Orders or Designated Retail Orders)
that provide liquidity under Rule 7018, if the credit under the Growth
Program was greater than the credit attained under Rule 7018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Growth Program originally included only the $0.0025
credit. See id. It added the $0.0027 credit in June 2017. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-80997 (June 28, 2017), 82 FR
29348 (June 22, 2017) (SR-NASDAQ-2017-060).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 7014(j) provided three ways in which a member could qualify
for the $0.0025 rebate in a given month. First, the member could
qualify for this rebate by: (i) Adding greater than 750,000 shares a
day on average during the month through one or more of its Nasdaq
Market Center MPIDs; and (ii) increasing its shares of liquidity
provided through one or more of its Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs as a
percent of Consolidated Volume by 20% versus the member's Growth
Baseline.\7\ Second, the member could qualify for the $0.0025 rebate
by: (i) Adding greater than 750,000 shares a day on average during the
month through one or more of its Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs; (ii)
increasing its shares of liquidity provided through one or more of its
Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs as a percent of Consolidated Volume by 20%
versus the member's Growth Baseline in the preceding month, and (iii)
maintaining or increasing its shares of liquidity provided through one
or more of its Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs as a percent of Consolidated
Volume as compared to the preceding month. Third, a member could
qualify for the Growth Program by: (i) Adding greater than 750,000
shares a day on average during the month through one or more of its
Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs in three separate months; (ii) increasing
its shares of liquidity provided through one or more of its Nasdaq
Market Center MPIDs as a percent of Consolidated Volume by 20% versus
the member's Growth Baseline in three separate months; and (iii)
maintaining or increasing its shares of liquidity provided through one
or more of its Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs as a percent of Consolidated
Volume compared to the Growth Baseline established when the member met
the criteria for the third month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Growth Baseline was defined as the member's shares of
liquidity provided in all securities through one or more of its
Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs as a percent of Consolidated Volume
during the last month a member qualified for the Nasdaq Growth
Program under Rule 7014(j)(1)(B)(i) (increasing its Consolidated
Volume by 20% versus its Growth Baseline). If a member had not yet
qualified for a credit under this program, its August 2016 share of
liquidity provided in all securities through one or more of its
Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs as a percent of Consolidated Volume was
used to establish a baseline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In 2017, the Exchange eliminated the $0.0025 rebate tier, stating
that it wished to simplify the operation of the Growth Program.\8\
However, the $0.0027 credit remains a part of the Growth Program, as
set forth in Rule 7014(j).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-82062 (Nov. 13,
2017), 82 FR 54457 (Nov. 17, 2017) (SR-NASDAQ-2017-119).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Since it eliminated the $0.0025 rebate tier, the Exchange has
received interest in reviving it, and it proposes to do so now.
However, the Exchange proposes modifications to the $0.0025 rebate tier
that will simplify and update it. In particular, the Exchange proposes
to omit one of the three means that it previously provided to qualify
for the $0.0025 rebate tier--namely, the provision that qualified a
member that (i) adds greater than 750,000 shares a day on average
during the month through one or more of its Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs;
(ii) increases its shares of liquidity provided through one or more of
its Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs as a percent of Consolidated Volume by
20% versus the member's Growth Baseline in the preceding month, and
(iii) maintains or increases its shares of liquidity provided through

one or more of its Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs as a percent of
Consolidated Volume as compared to the preceding month. The Exchange
also proposes to reset the Growth Baseline as a member's May 2018 share
of liquidity provided in all securities through one or more of its
Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs as a percent of Consolidated Volume.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\9\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and issuers and other persons using any facility, and is
not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation
NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market
model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.''\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005),
70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Likewise, in NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission
\12\ (``NetCoalition'') the D.C. Circuit upheld the Commission's use of
a market-based approach in evaluating the fairness of market data fees
against a challenge claiming that Congress mandated a cost-based
approach.\13\ As the court emphasized, the Commission ``intended in
Regulation NMS that `market forces, rather than regulatory
requirements' play a role in determining the market data . . . to be
made available to investors and at what cost.''\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
    \13\ See NetCoalition, at 534-535.
    \14\ Id. at 537.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is
`fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of
order flow from broker dealers'. . . .'' \15\ Although the court and
the SEC were discussing the cash equities markets, the Exchange
believes that these views apply with equal force to the options
markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Id. at 539 (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No.
59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008)
(SR-NYSEArca-2006-21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

First Change
    The proposal to eliminate the $0.00305 per share executed credits
for all three Tapes is reasonable because these credits have not been
effective in achieving their intended objective of incentivizing
members to provide liquidity to the Exchange and to NOM. The Exchange
has limited resources available to it to devote to the operation of
special pricing programs and as such, it is reasonable and equitable
for the Exchange to allocate those resources to those programs that are
effective and away from those programs that are ineffective. The
proposals are also equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because
the proposed changes to the credits will apply uniformly to all
similarly situated members.
Second Change
    The Exchange believes that re-establishing a $0.0025 per share
executed credit as part of the Nasdaq Growth Program is reasonable for
the reasons that the Exchange set forth in its original proposal to
establish that credit.\16\ In addition, the Exchange believes that it
is reasonable to re-establish the credit tier notwithstanding the fact
that it previously eliminated the tier, because the Exchange believes
that the program is more likely to be successful now than it was
previously in achieving its objective of increasing participation on
the Exchange. In particular, the Exchange notes that it has recently
received member interest in re-establishing the tier and has determined
that it is worthwhile to respond to such interest if doing so will
promote increased Exchange participation. The Exchange notes that it
intends to monitor the Growth Program closely to determine whether it
does, in fact, attract qualifying interest and incentivize greater
participation. If it does not do so, the Exchange will either further
modify or once again move to eliminate the $0.0025 rebate tier.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78977 (September
29, 2016), 81 FR 69140 (October 5, 2016) (SR-NASDAQ-2016-132).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes that it is reasonable to modify the
rebate tier from its prior formulation as a means of streamlining the
qualifications for the tier and rendering it easier for the Exchange to
administer and members to understand. The Exchange furthermore believes
that it is reasonable to reset the Growth Baseline to May 2018 as that
is the last month of activity prior to the restart of the program.
    Again, the Exchange believes that the proposal to re-establish the
$0.0025 rebate tier is an equitable allocation and is not unfairly
discriminatory for the reasons that the Exchange set forth in its
original proposal to establish that credit.\17\ The Exchange also
believes that its proposed changes to the prior iteration of the rebate
tier are equitable and non-discriminatory because they will apply
uniformly to members and will simplify the Growth Program. The Exchange
further notes that reviving this tier will benefit members and the
markets by providing additional means by which members may obtain
credits in exchange for increasing their participation in the markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In terms of inter-market
competition, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive, or rebate opportunities available at other venues to be more
favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust
its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges and with
alternative trading systems that have been exempted from compliance
with the statutory standards applicable to exchanges. Because
competitors are free to modify their own fees in response, and because
market participants may readily adjust their order routing practices,
the Exchange believes that the degree to which fee changes in this
market may impose any burden on competition is extremely limited.
    In this instance, the proposed elimination of the $0.00305 per
share executed credit and the revival of the $0.0025 credit will not
impose a burden on competition because the Exchange's

execution services are completely voluntary and subject to extensive
competition both from other exchanges and from off-exchange venues.
    The proposed changes to the credits are reflective of a robust and
competitive securities market, where trading venues must provide
incentives to participants in the form of credits to attract order flow
and adjust those incentives to make them more competitive or to allow
the Exchange to provide other market-improving incentives elsewhere.
    Moreover, trading venues are free to adjust their fees and credits
in response to any changes that the Exchange makes to its fees and
credits. If any of the changes proposed herein are unattractive to
market participants, it is likely that the Exchange will lose market
share as a result. Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that the
proposed changes will impair the ability of members or competing order
execution venues to maintain their competitive standing in the
financial markets.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2018-042 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2018-042. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2018-042, and should be submitted
on or before July 11, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-13163 Filed 6-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: December 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 230)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 74673]
[DOCID:fr01de10-27]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2007-0113-201016(b); FRL-9234-3]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Georgia: Stage
II Vapor Recovery

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Georgia State
Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted by the Georgia Environmental
Protection Division on September 26, 2006, with a clarifying revision
submitted on November 6, 2006. The September 26, 2006, submittal
includes multiple modifications to Georgia's Air Quality Rules found at
Chapter 391-3-1. Previously, EPA took action on the majority of the
September 26, 2006, submittal in an action published in the Federal
Register on February 9, 2010. In today's action, EPA is addressing only
the portion of the September 26, 2006, submittal that relates to
revisions to Georgia's Stage II gasoline vapor recovery rule at 391-3-
1-.02(zz). These revisions are part of Georgia's strategy to meet the
national ambient air quality standards. EPA has preliminarily
determined that these revisions are consistent with the December 12,
2006, EPA memorandum from Stephen D. Page entitled Removal of Stage II
Vapor Recovery in Situations Where Widespread Use of Onboard Refueling
Vapor Recovery is Demonstrated. EPA is proposing to approve Georgia's
SIP revisions pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before January 3, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number, ``EPA-
R04-OAR-2007-0113,'' by one of the following methods:
    1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    2. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    4. Mail: ``EPA-R04-OAR-2007-0113,'' Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
    5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Ms. Lynorae Benjamin, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation.
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
    Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules
section of this Federal Register for detailed instructions on how to
submit comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane Spann, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is (404)
562-9029. Ms. Spann can also be reached via electronic mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules Section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP revision as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no
further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the
direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received
will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed
rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document.
Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at
this time.
    For additional information see the direct final rule which is
published in the Rules Section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: November 10, 2010.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2010-30122 Filed 11-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 145 (Monday, August 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41535-41536]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16429]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket No. FRA-2021-0006-N-9]

Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment
Request

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of information collection; request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), this notice
announces that FRA is forwarding the Information Collection Request
(ICR) abstracted below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and comment. The ICR describes the information collection and
its expected burden. On May 17, 2021, FRA published a notice providing
a 60-day period for public comment on the ICR.

DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before
September 1, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed ICR
should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular ICR by
selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--Open for Public Comments''
or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kim Toone, Information Collection
Clearance Officer, at email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or telephone: (202) 493-
6132.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520, and its
implementing regulations, 5 CFR part 1320, require Federal agencies to
issue two notices seeking public comment on information collection
activities before OMB may approve paperwork packages. See 44 U.S.C.
3506, 3507; 5 CFR 1320.8 through 1320.12. On May 17, 2021, FRA
published a 60-day notice in the Federal Register soliciting comment on
the ICR for which it is now seeking OMB approval. See 86 FR 26771. FRA
received no comments in response to this 60-day notice.
    Before OMB decides whether to approve the proposed collection of
information, it must provide 30 days for public comment. Federal law
requires OMB to approve or disapprove paperwork packages between 30 and
60 days after the 30-day notice is published. 44 U.S.C. 3507(b)-(c); 5
CFR 1320.10(b); see also 60 FR 44978, 44983, Aug. 29, 1995. OMB
believes the 30-day notice informs the regulated community to file
relevant comments and affords the agency adequate time to digest public
comments before it renders a decision. 60 FR 44983, Aug. 29, 1995.
Therefore, respondents should submit their respective comments to OMB
within 30 days of publication to best ensure having their full effect.
    Comments are invited on the following ICR regarding: (1) Whether
the information collection activities are necessary for FRA to properly
execute its functions, including whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FRA's estimates of the burden of
the information collection activities, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used to determine the estimates; (3) ways
for FRA to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
being collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of information
collection activities on the public, including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
    The summary below describes the ICR that FRA will submit for OMB
clearance as the PRA requires:
    Title: Grants Management Requirements for Federal Railroad
Administration. Grants Awards and Cooperative Agreements.
    OMB Control Number: 2130-0615.
    Abstract: This ICR is a revision of a currently approved
collection, Grant Management Requirements for Federal Railroad
Administration. Specifically, FRA is revising FRA Form 217 (Categorical
Exclusion Worksheet) with this submission. All other forms associated
with this collection, which OMB re-approved on January 7, 2021, remain
unchanged. The forms for which FRA seeks renewal of its currently
approved collection are listed below.
    Form(s): All FRA forms (Fs) are located at FRA's public website;
all Standard Forms (SFs) are located at Grants.gov. The FRA forms are:
30 (FRA Assurance and Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment,
Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters and Drug-Free Workplace
Requirements), 31 (Grant Adjustment Require Form), 32 (Service Outcome
Agreement Annual Reporting), 33 (Final Performance Report), 34
(Quarterly Progress Report), 35 (Application Form), 217 (Categorical
Exclusion Worksheet), 229 (NIST Manufacturing Extension Partnership
Supplier Scouting--FRA Item Opportunity Synopsis), 251 (Applicant
Financial Capability Questionnaire), and 252 (Payment Summary
Spreadsheet). The SFs are: 270 (Request for Advance or Reimbursement),
424 (Application for Federal Assistance), 424A (Budget Information for
Non-Construction Programs), 424B (Assurance for Non-Construction
Programs), 424C (Budget Information for Construction Programs), 424D
(Assurances for Construction Programs), 425 (Federal Financial Report),
and LLL (Disclosure of Lobbying Activities).
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Affected Public: Generally includes States and local governments
and railroads.
    Frequency of Submission: Varied; on occasion/monthly.
    Total Estimated Annual Responses: 6,570.
    Total Estimated Annual Burden: 20,184.50 hours.
    Total Estimated Annual Burden Hour Dollar Cost Equivalent:
$827,362.66.
    Under 44 U.S.C. 3507(a) and 5 CFR 1320.5(b) and 1320.8(b)(3)(vi),
FRA informs all interested parties that a respondent is not required to
respond to, conduct, or sponsor a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.

    Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.

Brett A. Jortland,
Acting Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2021-16429 Filed 7-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 1484]
[FR Doc No: 2012-198]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. NJ12-4-000]

 Notice of Filing; City of Pasadena, CA

    Take notice that on December 14, 2011, City of Pasadena, California
submitted its tariff filing per 35.28(e): 2012 TRBAA Update Filing, to
be effective 1/1/2012.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 11, 2012.

    Dated: December 30, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-198 Filed 1-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 20162]
[FR Doc No: 2023-07104]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER23-1512-000]

Westlake Natrium LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Westlake Natrium LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is April 19, 2023.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 30, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-07104 Filed 4-4-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 76474]
[FR Doc No: 2022-27121]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 Notice of Denial of Water Quality Certification

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Project
                                                                  No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eagle Creek Hydro Power, LLC................................    9690-115
Eagle Creek Water Resources, LLC............................
Eagle Creek Land Resources, LLC.............................
Eagle Creek Hydro Power, LLC................................   10481-069
Eagle Creek Water Resources, LLC............................
Eagle Creek Land Resources, LLC.............................
Eagle Creek Hydro Power, LLC................................   10482-122
Eagle Creek Water Resources, LLC............................
Eagle Creek Land Resources, LLC.............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 31, 2020, Eagle Creek Hydro Power, LLC, Eagle Creek Water
Resources, LLC, and Eagle Creek Land Resources, LLC (co-licensees
collectively referred to as Eagle Creek) jointly filed an application
for a new license for each of the ``Mongaup River Projects'' consisting
of the Swinging Bridge Hydroelectric Project (P-10482), Mongaup Falls
Hydroelectric Project (P-10481), and the Rio Hydroelectric Project (P-
9690). Eagle Creek filed with the New York Department of Environmental
Conservation (New York DEC) a request for water quality certification
for the Mongaup River Projects under section 401(a)(1) of the Clean
Water Act on March 30, 2021. On March 24, 2022, the New York DEC denied
certification for the project. Eagle Creek filed a copy of New York
DEC's denial of certification on November 14, 2022. Pursuant to 40 CFR
121.8, we are providing notice that New York DEC's denial satisfies the
requirements of 40 CFR 121.7(e).

    Dated: December 8, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-27121 Filed 12-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: February 14, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 31)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 8589-8591]
[DOCID:fr14fe08-5]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket Nos. FAA-2007-0410, FAA-2007-0411, and FAA-2007-0412;
Directorate Identifiers 2007-NM-338-AD, 2007-NM-291-AD, and 2007-NM-
290-AD; Amendments 39-15325, 39-15326, 39-15327; ADs 2008-01-02, 2004-
07-22 R1, and 90-25-05 R1]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited Model (Caribou) DHC-
4 and (Caribou) DHC-4A Airplanes; and Boeing Model 747-100, 747-100B,
747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D,
747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; corrections.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting typographical errors in three existing
airworthiness directives (ADs) that were published in the Federal
Register on January 8, 2008 (73 FR 1269); January 7, 2008 (73 FR 1052);
and January 7, 2008 (73 FR 1055). The errors resulted in incorrect
docket numbers. One AD applies to all Viking Air Limited Model
(Caribou) DHC-4 and (Caribou) DHC-4A airplanes. The other two ADs apply
to all Boeing Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-
200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP
series airplanes. The Viking Air AD requires doing a fluorescent
penetrant inspection for cracking of certain upper engine mount bracket
assemblies, and corrective actions if necessary. One of the Boeing ADs
requires revising the FAA-approved maintenance inspection program to
include inspections that will give no less than the required damage
tolerance rating for each structural significant item, and repair of
cracked structure. The other Boeing AD requires implementing a
corrosion prevention and control program.

DATES: AD 2008-01-02 is effective January 23, 2008. ADs 2004-07-22 R1
and 90-25-05 R1 are effective January 22, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD dockets on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD dockets contain this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON AD 2008-01-02, CONTACT: George Duckett,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New
York Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON ADs 2004-07-22 R1 and 90-25-05 R1, CONTACT:
Ivan Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We have issued the ADs identified in the
following table.

                              Affected ADs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            AD--                    Affects--          And requires--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2008-01-02, amendment 39-     All Viking Air        A fluorescent
 15325 (73 FR 1269, January    Limited Model         penetrant
 8, 2008), issued December     (Caribou) DHC-4 and   inspection (FPI)
 20, 2007.                     (Caribou) DHC-4A      for cracking of
                               airplanes.            certain upper
                                                     engine mount
                                                     bracket assemblies,
                                                     and corrective
                                                     actions if
                                                     necessary.
2004-07-22 R1, amendment 39-  All Boeing Model 747- Revising the FAA-
 15326 (73 FR 1052, January    100, 747-100B, 747-   approved
 7, 2008), issued December     100B SUD, 747-200B,   maintenance
 26, 2007.                     747-200C, 747-200F,   inspection program
                               747-300, 747-400,     to include
                               747-400D, 747-400F,   inspections that
                               747SR, and 747SP      will give no less
                               series airplanes.     than the required
                                                     damage tolerance
                                                     rating for each
                                                     structural
                                                     significant item,
                                                     and repair of
                                                     cracked structure.
90-25-05 R1, amendment 39-    All Boeing Model 747- Implementing a
 15327 (73 FR 1055, January    100, 747-100B, 747-   corrosion
 7, 2008), issued December     100B SUD, 747-200B,   prevention and
 26, 2007.                     747-200C, 747-200F,   control program.
                               747-300, 747-400,     (That AD revised an
                               747-400D, 747-400F,   earlier AD by
                               747SR, and 747SP      removing future
                               series airplanes.     type-certificated
                                                     models from the
                                                     applicability.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As published, those ADs specify incorrect docket numbers throughout
the preamble and regulatory text. Docket numbers are assigned by the
Federal Document Management System. We have been informed that
incorrect docket numbers were assigned. The correct docket information
is provided in the following table.

                                           Corrected AD Docket Numbers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                AD No.                      Original Docket No.                  Corrected Docket No.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AD 2008-01-02........................  FAA-2008-0410................  FAA-2007-0410
2004-07-22 R1........................  FAA-2008-0411................  FAA-2007-0411
AD 90-25-05 R1.......................  FAA-2008-0412................  FAA-2007-0412
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any commenter who submitted comments to an original, incorrect
docket number should check Docket No. FAA-2007-0410, FAA-2007-0411, or
FAA 2007-0412 on www.regulations.gov to determine whether the comments
have been received and filed in the appropriate docket. If not, or if
it is not possible to determine whether comments have been posted to
the correct docket, the comments should be resubmitted using the
correct docket number.
    No other part of the preamble or regulatory information has been
changed; therefore, the final rule is not republished in the Federal
Register.
    The effective date of AD 2008-01-02 remains January 23, 2008. The
effective date of AD 2004-07-22 R1 remains January 22, 2008. The
effective date of AD 90-25-05 R1 remains January 22, 2008.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of January 8, 2008, on page 1269, in the
third column, the headings section of AD 2008-01-02 is corrected to
read as follows:
    ``[Docket No. FAA-2007-0410; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-338-AD;
Amendment 39-15325; AD 2008-01-02]''
    In the Federal Register of January 7, 2008, on page 1052, in the
first column, the headings section of AD 2004-07-22 R1 is corrected to
read as follows:
    ``[Docket No. FAA-2007-0411; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-291-AD;
Amendment 39-15326; AD 2004-07-22 R1]''
    In the Federal Register of January 7, 2008, on page 1055, in the
second column, the headings section of AD 90-25-05 R1 is corrected to
read as follows:
    ``[Docket No. FAA-2007-0412; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-290-AD;
Amendment 39-15327; AD 90-25-05 R1]''
    In the Federal Register of January 8, 2008, on page 1270, in the
second and third columns, the Supplemental Information section of
Docket No. FAA-2008-0410, Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-338-AD, is
corrected to read as follows:
    ``* * * Include ``Docket No. FAA-2007-0410; Directorate Identifier
2007-NM-338-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. * * *
    In the Federal Register of January 7, 2008, on page 1053, in the
second column, the Supplemental Information section of Docket No. FAA-
2008-0411, Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-291-AD, is corrected to read
as follows:
    ``* * * Include ``Docket No. FAA-2007-0411; Directorate Identifier
2007-NM-291-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. * * *
    In the Federal Register of January 7, 2008, on page 1056, in the
third column, the Supplemental Information section of Docket No. FAA-
2008-0412, Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-290-AD, is corrected to read
as follows:
    ``* * * Include ``Docket No. FAA-2007-0412; Directorate Identifier
2007-NM-290-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. * * *

Sec.  39.13  [Corrected]

0
In the Federal Register of January 8, 2008, on page 1271, in the first
column, paragraph 2. of PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES of AD 2008-
01-02 is corrected to read as follows:
* * * * *
2008-01-02 Viking Air Limited (Formerly Bombardier, Inc.): Amendment
39-15325. Docket No. FAA-2007-0410; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-
338-AD.
* * * * *
    In the Federal Register of January 7, 2008, on page 1053, in the
third column, paragraph 2. of PART 39-AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES of AD
2004-07-22 R1 is corrected to read as follows:
* * * * *
2004-07-22 R1 Boeing: Amendment 39-15326. Docket No. FAA-2007-0411;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-291-AD.
* * * * *

0
In the Federal Register of January 7, 2008, on page 1057, in the first
column, paragraph 2. of PART 39-AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES of AD 90-25-05
R1 is corrected to read as follows:
* * * * *

90-25-05 R1 Boeing: Amendment 39-15327. Docket No. FAA-2007-0412;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-290-AD.
* * * * *

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 7, 2008.
Kevin Hull,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-2623 Filed 2-13-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P