[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 67 (Friday, April 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20867-20869]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8261]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-66711; File No. SR-PHLX-2012-44]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Extend
the FLEX No Minimum Value Pilot Program

April 2, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on March 30, 2012, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has designated
the proposed rule change as constituting a rule change under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) under the Act,\3\ which renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing with the Commission a proposal to amend Phlx
Rule 1079 (FLEX Index, Equity and Currency Options) to extend a pilot
program that eliminates minimum value sizes for FLEX index options and
FLEX equity options (together known as ``FLEX Options'').\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ In addition to FLEX Options, FLEX currency options are also
traded on the Exchange. These flexible index, equity, and currency
options provide investors the ability to customize basic option
features including size, expiration date, exercise style, and
certain exercise prices; and may have expiration dates within five
years. See Rule 1079. FLEX currency options traded on the Exchange
are also known as FLEX World Currency Options (``WCO'') or Foreign
Currency Options (``FCO''). The pilot program discussed herein does
not encompass FLEX currency options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange requests that the Commission waive the 30-day
operative delay period contained in Exchange Act Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii).\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQOMXPHLX/Filings/, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this proposed rule change is to amend Phlx Rule 1079
(FLEX Index, Equity and Currency Options) to extend a pilot program
that eliminates minimum value sizes for FLEX Options (the ``Pilot
Program'' or ``Pilot'').
    Rule 1079 deals with the process of listing and trading FLEX
equity, index, and currency options on the Exchange. Rule 1079(a)(8)(A)
currently sets the minimum opening transaction value size in the case
of a FLEX Option in a newly established (opening) series if there is no
open interest in the particular series when a Request-for-Quote
(``RFQ'') is submitted (except as provided in Commentary .01 to Rule
1079): (i) $10 million underlying equivalent value, respecting FLEX
market index options, and $5 million underlying equivalent value
respecting FLEX industry index options; \6\ (ii) the lesser of 250
contracts or the number of contracts overlying $1 million in the
underlying securities, with respect to FLEX equity options (together
the ``minimum value size'').\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Market index options and industry index options are broad-
based index options and narrow-based index options, respectively.
See Rule 1000A(b)(11) and (12).
    \7\ Subsection (a)(8)(A) also provides a third alternative:
(iii) 50 contracts in the case of FLEX currency options. However,
this alternative is not part of the Pilot Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Presently, Commentary .01 to Rule 1079 states that by virtue of the
Pilot Program ending March 30, 2012, there shall be no minimum value
size requirements for FLEX Options as noted in subsections (a)(8)(A)(i)
and (a)(8)(A)(ii) above.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64108 (March 22,
2011), 76 FR 17174 (March 28, 2011) (SR-Phlx-2011-35) (notice of
filing and immediate effectiveness of proposal to extend Pilot
Program). The Pilot Program was instituted in 2010. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 62900 (September 13, 2010), 75 FR 57098
(September 17, 2010) (SR-Phlx-2010-123)(notice of filing and
immediate effectiveness of proposal to institute Pilot Program).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange now proposes to extend the Pilot Program for a period
ending May 31, 2012.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The Exchange notes that any positions established under this
Pilot would not be impacted by the expiration of the Pilot. For
example, a 10-contract FLEX equity option opening position that
overlies less than $1 million in the underlying security and expires
in January 2015 could be established during the Pilot. If the Pilot
Program were not extended, the position would continue to exist and
any further trading in the series would be subject to the minimum
value size requirements for continued trading in that series.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that there is sufficient investor interest
and demand in the Pilot Program to warrant an extension. The Exchange
believes that the Pilot Program has provided investors with additional
means of managing their risk exposures and carrying out their
investment objectives. Extension of the Pilot Program would continue to
provide greater opportunities for traders and investors to manage risk
through the use of FLEX Options, including investors that may otherwise
trade in the unregulated over the counter (``OTC'') market where
similar size restrictions do not apply.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The Exchange has not experienced any adverse market effects
with respect to the Pilot Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In support of the proposed extension of the Pilot Program, the
Exchange has under separate cover submitted to the Commission a Pilot
Program Report

(``Report'') that provides an analysis of the Pilot Program covering
the period during which the Pilot has been in effect. This Report
includes: (i) Data and analysis on the open interest and trading volume
in (a) FLEX equity options that have an opening transaction with a
minimum size of 0 to 249 contracts and less than $1 million in
underlying value; (b) FLEX index options that have an opening
transaction with a minimum opening size of less than $10 million in
underlying equivalent value; and (ii) analysis of the types of
investors that initiated opening FLEX Options transactions (i.e.,
institutional, high net worth, or retail). The Report has been
submitted to the Commission on a confidential basis.
    If, in the future, the Exchange proposes an additional extension of
the Pilot Program, or should the Exchange propose to make the Pilot
Program permanent, the Exchange will submit, along with any filing
proposing such amendments to the Pilot Program, an additional Pilot
Program Report covering the period during which the Pilot Program was
in effect and including the details referenced in the prior paragraph.
The Exchange will also provide the nominal dollar value of each trade.
The Pilot Program Report would be submitted to the Commission at least
one month prior to the expiration date of the Pilot Program unless the
Commission agrees otherwise, and would be provided on a confidential
basis.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \11\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \12\ in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of
a free and open market and a national market system. Specifically, the
Exchange believes that the proposed extension of the Pilot Program,
which eliminates the minimum value size applicable to FLEX Options,
would provide greater opportunities for investors to manage risk
through the use of FLEX Options. The Exchange notes that it has not
experienced any adverse market effects with respect to the Pilot
Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \13\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \15\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \16\ permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal
may become operative immediately upon filing. The Commission notes that
waiving the 30-day operative delay would allow trading under the Pilot
Program to continue on an uninterrupted basis, and believes that
waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest.\17\ Therefore, the Commission
designates the proposal operative upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \17\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-PHLX-2012-44 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PHLX-2012-44. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only

information that you wish to make available publicly.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PHLX-2012-44 and
should be submitted on or before April 27, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8261 Filed 4-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Washington, D.C. 20460

									            OFFICE OF

	PREVENTION, PESTICIDES

	AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON D.C., 20460

Date: 	July 1, 2008

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT:	Tetraconazole (Parent Only) Drinking Water Assessment in Support of Registration Actions for Use on Grapes, and Application Reduction for Pecans.

		PC Code:   	120603

DP Number:	D347085 and D350213.

FROM:	Iwona Maher, Chemist, ERB1

		Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P)

THROUGH:	Nancy Andrews, Ph.D., Branch Chief, ERB1

		Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P)

TO:		Mary Waller, Product Manager 21, FB

Susan Stanton, Risk Manager Reviewer, FB

Registration Division (7505P)

Mary Clock-Rust, Risk Assessor, RAB1

Dana Vogel, Branch Chief, RAB1

Health Effects Division (7509P)

A Tier II drinking water modeling was performed for tetraconazole new use on grapes and reduced rate on pecans.  The registrant proposed to expend tetraconazole fungicide uses by adding use on grapes, and proposed to lower the application rate for pecans by half of the current label maximum application rate.  The proposed application rate to pecans will allow for only four applications instead of eight applications.  The application rate for grapes is significantly lower than the application rates for currently registered crops.  Therefore the latest drinking water is still valid with the exception of DWEC for the lowered application rate to pecans.  Therefore, the PRZM/EXAMS modeling was updated for the highest drinking water estimates using the new PE5 shell version, new input parameter for the partition coefficient value (Koc), and the lowered application rate to pecans.  For consistency, Sci-Grow modeling was contacted using the new Koc value and the proposed pecan rate.

The latest drinking water assessment was completed in 2006, since then, the registrant submitted a new batch equilibrium study.  The study is scientifically sound and provides acceptable information on transport of tetraconazole (MRID 47023201).  The new Koc values were derived for American soils, and therefore, more appropriate then those for foreign soils used in the previous modeling.  In addition, the registrant submitted one magnitude of residue study with one decline residue study.  This study was conducted on grape fruits only, not foliage; therefore, the results from this trial could not be used for the foliar dissipation half-life calculation for drinking water modeling.

For aerial applications, the refined   SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 acute drinking water concentration in surface water (1-in-10 year annual peak concentration) reached a maximum of 10.45 μg/l for pecan applications, but was much lower (6.68-5.95 μg/l) for sugar beets and peanuts (Table 3).  The refined chronic non-cancer drinking water concentration (1- in-10 year annual average concentration) is not expected to exceed 4.68 μg/l, and   SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 the refined cancer/chronic drinking water concentration (  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 30-year annual average) is not expected to exceed 3.29 μg/l for sugar beets use.  These concentrations are recommended to be used for the human health risk assessment purpose.    SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 For ground water, the SCI-GROW model estimated the concentration of tetraconazole in shallow ground from 0.16 to 0.40 μg/l depending on crop application rates (Table 5).

Use Characterization

According to the proposed label no more than 0.50 lbs a.i. (Eminent 125SL) may be applied to pecans per acre per year, with the maximum rate per application of 0.125 lbs a.i., minimum intervals of 14 days between applications, and up to 4 applications per year.  The proposed maximum annual application rate on grapes is no more than 0.08 lbs a.i. (Mettle 125ME) applied per acre per year.  Table 1 lists in detail the proposed application rates for grapes and pecans, and currently registered maximum application rate to soybeans, sugar beets, and peanuts.

Table 1.  Tetraconazole Use Patterns for Peanuts, Sugar Beets, Soybeans, Pecansa, and        Grapes.

Crop	Single Maximum Application Rate

(lb a.i./A)	Maximum Number of

Applications	Minimum

Application Interval (days)	Maximum Annual Application Rate

(lb a.i./A/season)

Peanuts	0.10	4	14	0.40

Sugar beets	0.10	2	21	0.201

Soybeansb	0.075	2	15	0.15

Pecans	0.125	4	14	0.50

Grape c	0.04	2	14	0.08

a Data obtained from label for Eminent 125SL

b Data obtained from Domark 230 ME Fungicide

c Data obtained from Mettle 125ME Fungicide

Drinking Water Exposure Modeling

	Surface Water

A Tier II drinking water assessment was performed using PRZM 3.12/EXAMS 2.98.04 modeling with index reservoir (IR) scenarios and percent cropped area (PCA) adjustment factors.  The assessment was based on tetraconazole proposed reduced rate use on pecans that is still the highest application rate among all the registered and proposed uses.  The scenarios that were modeled are those that provided the highest estimates for drinking water concentrations in the previous assessment.  Those are Georgia pecans, Minnesota sugar beets, and North Carolina peanuts.  The proposed use on grapes was not modeled since the application rate is significantly lower then tetraconazole application rates for other crops already registered.

Since the last drinking water assessment was performed, the registrant submitted a new batch equilibrium study conducted on five American soils (MRID 47023201).  The study was classified as valid and acceptable, and a partition coefficient obtained from this study was used in the modeling as an input parameter.  In the previous drinking water assessment performed in 2006, a partition coefficient obtained from foreign soils was utilized (MRID 44367006).  The previously used partition coefficient carried uncertainties associated with the foreign soil potentially not being comparable to the American agricultural soil in the area of currently proposed tetraconazole use.  Table 2 lists the input parameters used for the PRZM/EXAMS modeling.

Table 2.  PRZM/EXAMS Chemical Specific Input Parameters for Tetraconazole

Parameter	Input Value and Unit	Source

Maximum application rate	Peanuts:	      0.112 kg a.i./ha

Sugar beets: 0.112  kg a.i./ha

Pecans:	     0.14 kg a.i./ha	Product Label

Maximum number of applications	Peanuts:       4

Sugar beets: 2

Pecans:	     4		Product Label

Method of application (CAM = 2)	Aerial and ground spray	Product Label

Minimum interval between applications 	Peanuts:	      14

Sugar beets:   21

Pecans:	      14	Product Label

Application efficiency 	0.95 (aerial spray)

0.99 (ground spray)	  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 EFED Model Input Guidance, Version II (2002b) a

Spray drift	0.016 (aerial)

0.064 (ground)	  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 EFED Model Input Guidance, Version II (2002b) a

Partition coefficient Koc b	4424 mL/g	MRID 44367006

Henry’s Law constant	3.5x10-9 atm-m3/mole	Tomlin 2003

Hydrolysis	Stable	MRID 44367002

Aerobic soil metabolism	Stable 	MRID 44367005

Aerobic aquatic metabolism (t1/2) c	447 days	MRID 44751319

Anaerobic aquatic metabolism (t1/2)	Stable	MRID 45840001

Aquatic photolysis t1/2 (days)	215 days	MRID 44367003

Vapor pressure	9.901x10-7 mm Hg 	MRID 45851801

Solubility in water (pH 7, 20 °C) d	1560 mg/L (pH 7 and 20 °C) Tomlin 2003 (solubility x 10)

Molecular Weight	372.1 	Tomlin 2003

Foliar dissipation half-life e	13 days (PLDKRT = 0.053 days-1)	MRIDs 46614308–46614319, 46637501, 46614334

Initial application dates	GA Pecans                   1-05

MN Sugar beets          15-06

NC Peanuts                15-06	Application timing was selected based on data from the USDA Crop profile website (http://pestdata.ncsu.edu/cropprofiles/).

a Guidance for Selecting Input Parameters in Modeling the Environmental Fate and Transport of Pesticides, Version II, dated February 28, 2002.

b   SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 The reviewer-calculated coefficients of determination (R2) for the relationships Kads vs. organic matter = 0.94; therefore, the average Koc obtained from five values (11491, 2896, 5841, 670, and 1220) was used for this parameter.

c 90% mean UCL calculated using half-lives of 382 and 320 days

d Solubility 156 mg/L x 10

e The 90th percentile of the upper bound of the mean foliar dissipation half-life

Detail information on how the model input parameters were derived is available in the previous drinking water assessment completed in 2006 (Tetraconazole (Parent Only) Drinking Water Assessment in Support of Registration Actions for Uses on Peanuts, Pecans, Sugar Beets, Soybeans, and Turf.  Dated: Nov. 27, 2006.  D321622).

Table 3 provides the refined PCA adjusted 1-in-10 year estimated drinking water concentrations (EDWC) and the 30-year annual   SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 mean concentrations derived from PRZM/EXAM modeling.  PRZM/EXAMS modeling output files are provided in the Appendix A of this document.

EDWC for Tetraconazole (ppb or μg/L) Obtained from PRZM/EXAMS1

Scenario	PCA	Peak	Yearly	30 Year Annual Average

Minnesota Sugar Beets

Aerial spray	0.87	6.68	4.68	3.29

Ground spray	0.87	6.22	4.22	2.87

North Carolina Peanuts

Aerial spray	0.87 	7.73	4.55	3.88

	0.67	5.95	3.51	2.99

Ground spray	0.87	7.15	4.18	3.52

	0.67	5.51	3.22	2.71

Georgia Pecans

Aerial spray	0.87	10.69	3.56	2.91

	0.85	10.45	3.48	2.84

Ground spray	0.87	10.27	3.34	2.67

	0.85	10.03	3.26	2.61

1   SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 EXAMS EEC multiplied by national default and regional maximum PCA values

Ground Water

Groundwater concentrations were estimated using the Tier I model SCI-GROW Version 2.3.  SCI-GROW provides a groundwater screening exposure value to be used in determining the potential risk to human health from drinking water contaminated with the pesticide.  Table 4 lists the SCI-GROW input parameters.

Table 4.  SCI-GROW Input Parameters for Tetraconazole

Property	Input Value	Comments	Source

Aerobic soil metabolism half-life	1000 days	1000 days was used since tetraconazole was stable in an aerobic soil metabolism study over the course of 52 weeks.	MRID 44367005

Koc	670 mL/g	Lowest Koc value was used since there is a greater than 3-fold variation in the values. 	MRID 44367006

Application rate (lbs a.i./A)	0.10 (sugar beets)

0.10 (peanuts)

0.125 (pecans)

Product Label

Maximum number of application per season	2 (sugar beets)

4 (peanuts)

4 (pecans)

Product Label

Tetraconazole levels in groundwater ranged from approximately 0.16 to 0.4 ppb.  Table 5 presents the range of groundwater concentrations for the different registered crop applications.  Sci-Grow modeling output files are provided in the Appendix B of this document.

Table 5.  Estimated Concentrations of Tetraconazole in Groundwater

Crop	Concentration (ppb or μg/L)

Sugar beets	1.59E-01

	Peanuts	3.18E-01

	Pecans	3.97E-01

Detail information on drinking water assessment such as modeling assumption and uncertainties, and detail fate and transport information can be found in the comprehensive drinking water assessment document completed in November of 2006 (D321622).

APPENDIX A

PRZM/EXAMS Modeling Output Files

For Sugarbeets via Ground Application

stored as TetraGRSugarBeetsMNDW.out

Chemical: tetraconazole

PRZM environment: MNsugarbeetSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 29 May 2007 at 12:57:22

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 15:34:12

Metfile: w14914.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 09:05:52

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	0.3691	0.3399	0.2752	0.2168	0.2156	0.1056

1962	0.9731	0.9206	0.7828	0.6833	0.6456	0.4081

1963	1.32	1.259	1.077	0.8945	0.8367	0.6543

1964	2.223	2.101	1.774	1.465	1.43	1.046

1965	2.431	2.317	1.976	1.674	1.624	1.45

1966	2.152	2.102	2.029	1.914	1.845	1.64

1967	2.236	2.196	2.049	1.887	1.89	1.711

1968	2.249	2.192	2.089	1.946	1.95	1.776

1969	4.334	4.144	3.748	3.164	2.957	2.34

1970	4.567	4.391	3.868	3.357	3.192	2.757

1971	4.338	4.219	3.992	3.683	3.59	3.053

1972	4.026	3.942	3.693	3.507	3.487	3.283

1973	4.741	4.594	4.196	3.825	3.693	3.241

1974	6.79	6.517	5.701	5.092	4.815	3.967

1975	7.186	6.984	6.345	5.621	5.356	4.56

1976	4.57	4.548	4.479	4.444	4.44	4.172

1977	7.381	7.067	6.148	5.386	5.505	4.756

1978	6.181	6.04	5.614	5.365	5.376	4.968

1979	6.595	6.436	6.032	5.504	5.405	5.116

1980	5.895	5.785	5.456	5.293	5.157	4.86

1981	5.425	5.331	5.056	4.929	4.866	4.569

1982	7.415	7.128	6.263	5.406	5.124	4.458

1983	5.266	5.17	4.953	4.738	4.662	4.433

1984	6.501	6.308	5.822	5.176	4.904	4.416

1985	5.569	5.445	5.188	4.973	4.972	4.545

1986	5.496	5.389	5.211	5.004	4.941	4.618

1987	4.861	4.787	4.564	4.419	4.379	4.241

1988	4.662	4.591	4.326	4.037	3.97	3.866

1989	5.466	5.315	4.955	4.458	4.294	3.94

1990	4.858	4.751	4.484	4.24	4.109	3.849

Sorted results

Prob.		Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	7.415	7.128	6.345	5.621	5.505	5.116

0.0645161290322581	7.381	7.067	6.263	5.504	5.405	4.968

0.0967741935483871	7.186	6.984	6.148	5.406	5.376	4.86

0.129032258064516	6.79	6.517	6.032	5.386	5.356	4.756

0.161290322580645	6.595	6.436	5.822	5.365	5.157	4.618

0.193548387096774	6.501	6.308	5.701	5.293	5.124	4.569

0.225806451612903	6.181	6.04	5.614	5.176	4.972	4.56

0.258064516129032	5.895	5.785	5.456	5.092	4.941	4.545

0.290322580645161	5.569	5.445	5.211	5.004	4.904	4.458

0.32258064516129	5.496	5.389	5.188	4.973	4.866	4.433

0.354838709677419	5.466	5.331	5.056	4.929	4.815	4.416

0.387096774193548	5.425	5.315	4.955	4.738	4.662	4.241

0.419354838709677	5.266	5.17	4.953	4.458	4.44	4.172

0.451612903225806	4.861	4.787	4.564	4.444	4.379	3.967

0.483870967741936	4.858	4.751	4.484	4.419	4.294	3.94

0.516129032258065	4.741	4.594	4.479	4.24	4.109	3.866

0.548387096774194	4.662	4.591	4.326	4.037	3.97	3.849

0.580645161290323	4.57	4.548	4.196	3.825	3.693	3.283

0.612903225806452	4.567	4.391	3.992	3.683	3.59	3.241

0.645161290322581	4.338	4.219	3.868	3.507	3.487	3.053

0.67741935483871	4.334	4.144	3.748	3.357	3.192	2.757

0.709677419354839	4.026	3.942	3.693	3.164	2.957	2.34

0.741935483870968	2.431	2.317	2.089	1.946	1.95	1.776

0.774193548387097	2.249	2.196	2.049	1.914	1.89	1.711

0.806451612903226	2.236	2.192	2.029	1.887	1.845	1.64

0.838709677419355	2.223	2.102	1.976	1.674	1.624	1.45

0.870967741935484	2.152	2.101	1.774	1.465	1.43	1.046

0.903225806451613	1.32	1.259	1.077	0.8945	0.8367	0.6543

0.935483870967742	0.9731	0.9206	0.7828	0.6833	0.6456	0.4081

0.967741935483871	0.3691	0.3399	0.2752	0.2168	0.2156	0.1056

0.1		7.1464	6.9373	6.1364	5.404	5.374	4.8496

					Average of yearly averages:	3.2933

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: TetraGRSugarBeetsMNDW

Metfile:	w14914.dvf

PRZM scenario:	MNsugarbeetSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	tetraconazole

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	372.1	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	3.5e-9	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	9.9e-7	torr

Solubility	sol	1560	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	4424	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	215	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	447	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	0	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	0	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI		cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	.112	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	.99	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.064	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	15-06	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	21	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1	apprate		kg/ha

Record 17:	FILTRA

	IPSCND

	UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

	PLDKRT	0.053

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

For Sugarbeets via Aerial Application

stored as TetraAirSugarBeetsMNDW.out

Chemical: tetraconazole

PRZM environment: MNsugarbeetSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 29 May 2007 at 12:57:22

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 15:34:12

Metfile: w14914.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 09:05:52

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	0.9228	0.8499	0.6542	0.4979	0.4381	0.2021

1962	1.617	1.521	1.244	1.043	0.9802	0.6074

1963	1.66	1.595	1.401	1.281	1.241	0.9373

1964	2.767	2.621	2.272	1.974	1.89	1.39

1965	2.701	2.591	2.325	2.202	2.132	1.842

1966	2.707	2.64	2.514	2.45	2.384	2.078

1967	2.968	2.89	2.655	2.508	2.41	2.191

1968	3.081	2.999	2.775	2.613	2.509	2.289

1969	4.976	4.775	4.399	3.757	3.539	2.86

1970	5.029	4.859	4.353	3.856	3.694	3.283

1971	4.817	4.702	4.481	4.185	4.1	3.587

1972	4.535	4.454	4.269	4.152	4.107	3.823

1973	5.241	5.099	4.713	4.361	4.228	3.796

1974	7.288	7.02	6.214	5.652	5.364	4.505

1975	7.719	7.508	7.037	6.27	5.967	5.083

1976	5.43	5.349	5.103	4.954	4.923	4.715

1977	7.722	7.42	6.728	6.003	6.069	5.281

1978	6.955	6.785	6.271	6.055	6.014	5.489

1979	6.985	6.832	6.442	6.058	5.92	5.636

1980	6.397	6.29	5.969	5.818	5.68	5.393

1981	6.041	5.943	5.75	5.573	5.505	5.117

1982	7.847	7.571	6.738	5.911	5.636	5.014

1983	6.07	5.943	5.769	5.435	5.327	4.993

1984	6.968	6.782	6.314	5.689	5.426	4.976

1985	6.132	6.024	5.765	5.624	5.601	5.102

1986	6.282	6.148	5.825	5.723	5.611	5.175

1987	5.612	5.521	5.278	5.143	5.067	4.812

1988	5.216	5.147	4.888	4.603	4.572	4.449

1989	6.001	5.854	5.504	5.016	4.866	4.519

1990	5.636	5.505	5.232	4.953	4.798	4.432

Sorted results

Prob.		Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	7.847	7.571	7.037	6.27	6.069	5.636

0.0645161290322581	7.722	7.508	6.738	6.058	6.014	5.489

0.0967741935483871	7.719	7.42	6.728	6.055	5.967	5.393

0.129032258064516	7.288	7.02	6.442	6.003	5.92	5.281

0.161290322580645	6.985	6.832	6.314	5.911	5.68	5.175

0.193548387096774	6.968	6.785	6.271	5.818	5.636	5.117

0.225806451612903	6.955	6.782	6.214	5.723	5.611	5.102

0.258064516129032	6.397	6.29	5.969	5.689	5.601	5.083

0.290322580645161	6.282	6.148	5.825	5.652	5.505	5.014

0.32258064516129	6.132	6.024	5.769	5.624	5.426	4.993

0.354838709677419	6.07	5.943	5.765	5.573	5.364	4.976

0.387096774193548	6.041	5.943	5.75	5.435	5.327	4.812

0.419354838709677	6.001	5.854	5.504	5.143	5.067	4.715

0.451612903225806	5.636	5.521	5.278	5.016	4.923	4.519

0.483870967741936	5.612	5.505	5.232	4.954	4.866	4.505

0.516129032258065	5.43	5.349	5.103	4.953	4.798	4.449

0.548387096774194	5.241	5.147	4.888	4.603	4.572	4.432

0.580645161290323	5.216	5.099	4.713	4.361	4.228	3.823

0.612903225806452	5.029	4.859	4.481	4.185	4.107	3.796

0.645161290322581	4.976	4.775	4.399	4.152	4.1	3.587

0.67741935483871	4.817	4.702	4.353	3.856	3.694	3.283

0.709677419354839	4.535	4.454	4.269	3.757	3.539	2.86

0.741935483870968	3.081	2.999	2.775	2.613	2.509	2.289

0.774193548387097	2.968	2.89	2.655	2.508	2.41	2.191

0.806451612903226	2.767	2.64	2.514	2.45	2.384	2.078

0.838709677419355	2.707	2.621	2.325	2.202	2.132	1.842

0.870967741935484	2.701	2.591	2.272	1.974	1.89	1.39

0.903225806451613	1.66	1.595	1.401	1.281	1.241	0.9373

0.935483870967742	1.617	1.521	1.244	1.043	0.9802	0.6074

0.967741935483871	0.9228	0.8499	0.6542	0.4979	0.4381	0.2021

0.1		7.6759	7.38	6.6994	6.0498	5.9623	5.3818

					Average of yearly averages:	3.78589333333333

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: TetraAirSugarBeetsMNDW

Metfile:	w14914.dvf

PRZM scenario:	MNsugarbeetSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	tetraconazole

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	372.1	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	3.5e-9	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	9.9e-7	torr

Solubility	sol	1560	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	4424	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	215	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	447	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	0	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	0	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI		cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	.112	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	.95	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.16	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	15-06	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	21	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1	apprate		kg/ha

Record 17:	FILTRA

	IPSCND

	UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

	PLDKRT	0.053

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

For Pecans via Aerial Application

stored as TetraAirGAPecansMNDW.out

Chemical: tetraconazole

PRZM environment: GAPecansSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 29 May 2007 at 12:55:08

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 15:34:12

Metfile: w93805.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 09:04:32

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	2.835	2.592	1.973	1.326	1.195	0.664

1962	3.424	3.199	2.566	2.252	2.123	1.687

1963	4.175	3.923	3.284	3.012	2.936	2.298

1964	12.4	11.38	9.151	6.731	6.043	4.064

1965	13.43	12.43	9.514	7.87	7.096	4.865

1966	10.28	9.786	8.055	6.383	6.092	4.812

1967	5.285	5.057	4.674	4.485	4.266	3.759

1968	6.932	6.435	5.074	4.128	3.911	3.124

1969	10.15	9.415	7.332	5.43	5.54	3.912

1970	11.73	10.83	8.256	6.133	5.52	4.101

1971	5.674	5.386	5.112	4.277	4.172	3.36

1972	12.1	11.13	8.792	6.192	5.456	3.819

1973	6.619	6.34	5.837	5.128	4.802	3.945

1974	5.778	5.468	4.624	4.233	3.991	3.353

1975	8.723	8.116	6.554	5.088	4.905	3.724

1976	6.326	5.973	5.161	4.904	4.517	3.752

1977	4.992	4.741	4.451	3.925	3.8	3.248

1978	6.097	5.694	4.808	3.885	3.646	2.877

1979	7.754	7.216	6.49	5.146	4.69	3.591

1980	7.327	6.846	5.504	4.235	4.11	3.359

1981	4.25	4.056	3.504	3.291	3.144	2.767

1982	12.31	11.26	8.383	6.242	5.454	3.38

1983	5.396	5.119	4.793	4.265	3.923	3.234

1984	4.661	4.428	3.972	3.695	3.559	2.941

1985	8.684	8.002	6.055	4.934	4.462	3.206

1986	7.686	7.159	6.061	5.411	5.1	3.739

1987	8.212	7.655	6.796	5.33	5.062	3.744

1988	4.301	4.136	3.869	3.42	3.321	3.033

1989	8.915	8.245	6.94	5.469	4.831	3.27

1990	4.957	4.676	3.894	3.352	3.187	2.711

Sorted results

Prob.		Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	13.43	12.43	9.514	7.87	7.096	4.865

0.0645161290322581	12.4	11.38	9.151	6.731	6.092	4.812

0.0967741935483871	12.31	11.26	8.792	6.383	6.043	4.101

0.129032258064516	12.1	11.13	8.383	6.242	5.54	4.064

0.161290322580645	11.73	10.83	8.256	6.192	5.52	3.945

0.193548387096774	10.28	9.786	8.055	6.133	5.456	3.912

0.225806451612903	10.15	9.415	7.332	5.469	5.454	3.819

0.258064516129032	8.915	8.245	6.94	5.43	5.1	3.759

0.290322580645161	8.723	8.116	6.796	5.411	5.062	3.752

0.32258064516129	8.684	8.002	6.554	5.33	4.905	3.744

0.354838709677419	8.212	7.655	6.49	5.146	4.831	3.739

0.387096774193548	7.754	7.216	6.061	5.128	4.802	3.724

0.419354838709677	7.686	7.159	6.055	5.088	4.69	3.591

0.451612903225806	7.327	6.846	5.837	4.934	4.517	3.38

0.483870967741936	6.932	6.435	5.504	4.904	4.462	3.36

0.516129032258065	6.619	6.34	5.161	4.485	4.266	3.359

0.548387096774194	6.326	5.973	5.112	4.277	4.172	3.353

0.580645161290323	6.097	5.694	5.074	4.265	4.11	3.27

0.612903225806452	5.778	5.468	4.808	4.235	3.991	3.248

0.645161290322581	5.674	5.386	4.793	4.233	3.923	3.234

0.67741935483871	5.396	5.119	4.674	4.128	3.911	3.206

0.709677419354839	5.285	5.057	4.624	3.925	3.8	3.124

0.741935483870968	4.992	4.741	4.451	3.885	3.646	3.033

0.774193548387097	4.957	4.676	3.972	3.695	3.559	2.941

0.806451612903226	4.661	4.428	3.894	3.42	3.321	2.877

0.838709677419355	4.301	4.136	3.869	3.352	3.187	2.767

0.870967741935484	4.25	4.056	3.504	3.291	3.144	2.711

0.903225806451613	4.175	3.923	3.284	3.012	2.936	2.298

0.935483870967742	3.424	3.199	2.566	2.252	2.123	1.687

0.967741935483871	2.835	2.592	1.973	1.326	1.195	0.664

0.1		12.289	11.247	8.7511	6.3689	5.9927	4.0973

					Average of yearly averages:	3.34463333333333

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: TetraAirGAPecansMNDW

Metfile:	w93805.dvf

PRZM scenario:	GAPecansSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	tetraconazole

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	372.1	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	3.5e-9	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	9.9e-7	torr

Solubility	sol	1560	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	4424	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	215	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	447	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	0	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	0	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI		cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	.14	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	.95	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.16	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	01-05	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	14	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1	apprate	.14	kg/ha

Interval 2	interval	14	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 2	apprate	.14	kg/ha

Interval 3	interval	14	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 3	apprate	.14	kg/ha

Record 17:	FILTRA

	IPSCND

	UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

	PLDKRT	0.053

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

For Pecans via Ground Application

stored as TetraGrGAPecansMNDW.out

Chemical: tetraconazole

PRZM environment: GAPecansSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 29 May 2007 at 12:55:08

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 15:34:12

Metfile: w93805.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 09:04:32

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	2.73	2.479	1.839	1.174	1.02	0.4821

1962	3.215	2.984	2.336	2.027	1.885	1.429

1963	3.904	3.649	2.978	2.546	2.568	2.011

1964	12.42	11.37	9.079	6.56	5.875	3.826

1965	12.92	11.95	9.121	7.568	6.834	4.649

1966	9.95	9.35	7.51	6	5.746	4.588

1967	4.6	4.422	4.063	3.89	3.733	3.488

1968	6.823	6.306	4.896	3.925	3.71	2.826

1969	10.18	9.422	7.258	5.29	5.351	3.646

1970	11.73	10.79	8.139	5.938	5.321	3.841

1971	5.446	5.151	4.875	3.955	3.787	3.068

1972	11.66	10.71	8.437	5.879	5.154	3.549

1973	5.801	5.551	5.179	4.536	4.345	3.68

1974	5.616	5.295	4.422	3.996	3.746	3.062

1975	8.621	7.995	6.384	4.883	4.477	3.449

1976	6.214	5.847	4.89	4.348	4.043	3.478

1977	4.726	4.474	4.197	3.674	3.356	2.952

1978	5.792	5.386	4.508	3.595	3.22	2.565

1979	7.519	6.973	6.255	4.903	4.45	3.309

1980	7.149	6.655	5.277	3.987	3.635	3.069

1981	4.134	3.932	3.347	3.094	2.876	2.452

1982	11.81	10.78	7.974	5.92	5.157	3.091

1983	4.602	4.396	4.094	3.638	3.365	2.939

1984	3.773	3.612	3.207	3.081	3.01	2.634

1985	7.959	7.323	5.506	4.537	4.099	2.91

1986	6.919	6.444	5.513	5.035	4.774	3.465

1987	7.506	6.996	6.299	4.936	4.719	3.47

1988	4.199	4.029	3.747	3.289	3.122	2.729

1989	8.341	7.7	6.507	5.042	4.404	2.975

1990	4.152	3.924	3.27	2.786	2.696	2.394

Sorted results

Prob.		Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	12.92	11.95	9.121	7.568	6.834	4.649

0.0645161290322581	12.42	11.37	9.079	6.56	5.875	4.588

0.0967741935483871	11.81	10.79	8.437	6	5.746	3.841

0.129032258064516	11.73	10.78	8.139	5.938	5.351	3.826

0.161290322580645	11.66	10.71	7.974	5.92	5.321	3.68

0.193548387096774	10.18	9.422	7.51	5.879	5.157	3.646

0.225806451612903	9.95	9.35	7.258	5.29	5.154	3.549

0.258064516129032	8.621	7.995	6.507	5.042	4.774	3.488

0.290322580645161	8.341	7.7	6.384	5.035	4.719	3.478

0.32258064516129	7.959	7.323	6.299	4.936	4.477	3.47

0.354838709677419	7.519	6.996	6.255	4.903	4.45	3.465

0.387096774193548	7.506	6.973	5.513	4.883	4.404	3.449

0.419354838709677	7.149	6.655	5.506	4.537	4.345	3.309

0.451612903225806	6.919	6.444	5.277	4.536	4.099	3.091

0.483870967741936	6.823	6.306	5.179	4.348	4.043	3.069

0.516129032258065	6.214	5.847	4.896	3.996	3.787	3.068

0.548387096774194	5.801	5.551	4.89	3.987	3.746	3.062

0.580645161290323	5.792	5.386	4.875	3.955	3.733	2.975

0.612903225806452	5.616	5.295	4.508	3.925	3.71	2.952

0.645161290322581	5.446	5.151	4.422	3.89	3.635	2.939

0.67741935483871	4.726	4.474	4.197	3.674	3.365	2.91

0.709677419354839	4.602	4.422	4.094	3.638	3.356	2.826

0.741935483870968	4.6	4.396	4.063	3.595	3.22	2.729

0.774193548387097	4.199	4.029	3.747	3.289	3.122	2.634

0.806451612903226	4.152	3.932	3.347	3.094	3.01	2.565

0.838709677419355	4.134	3.924	3.27	3.081	2.876	2.452

0.870967741935484	3.904	3.649	3.207	2.786	2.696	2.394

0.903225806451613	3.773	3.612	2.978	2.546	2.568	2.011

0.935483870967742	3.215	2.984	2.336	2.027	1.885	1.429

0.967741935483871	2.73	2.479	1.839	1.174	1.02	0.4821

0.1		11.802	10.789	8.4072	5.9938	5.7065	3.8395

					Average of yearly averages:	3.06753666666667

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: TetraGrGAPecansMNDW

Metfile:	w93805.dvf

PRZM scenario:	GAPecansSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	tetraconazole

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	372.1	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	3.5e-9	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	9.9e-7	torr

Solubility	sol	1560	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	4424	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	215	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	447	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	0	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	0	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI		cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	.14	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	.99	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.064	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	01-05	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	14	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1	apprate	.14	kg/ha

Interval 2	interval	14	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 2	apprate	.14	kg/ha

Interval 3	interval	14	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 3	apprate	.14	kg/ha

Record 17:	FILTRA

	IPSCND

	UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

	PLDKRT	0.053

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

For Peanuts via Aerial Application

stored as TetraAirNCpeanutsMNDW.out

Chemical: tetraconazole

PRZM environment: NCpeanutSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 29 May 2007 at 12:58:46

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 15:34:12

Metfile: w13722.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 09:05:50

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	1.61	1.533	1.335	1.176	1.08	0.5206

1962	5.607	5.268	4.366	3.398	2.948	2.129

1963	8.118	7.591	6.042	4.667	3.963	2.977

1964	7.159	6.846	6.097	5.64	5.259	4.074

1965	7.091	6.838	6.291	5.974	5.645	4.6

1966	6.373	6.168	5.816	5.372	5.254	4.663

1967	6.924	6.651	6.229	5.828	5.695	4.642

1968	6.255	6.038	5.395	4.994	4.742	4.51

1969	6.848	6.604	6.014	5.514	5.447	4.568

1970	5.911	5.703	5.45	5.135	4.869	4.325

1971	6.394	6.171	5.746	5.215	5.059	4.491

1972	7.191	6.925	6.122	5.644	5.502	4.735

1973	8.969	8.558	7.571	6.939	6.523	5.36

1974	6.885	6.66	6.026	5.645	5.51	5.146

1975	9.07	8.635	7.659	6.378	6.065	5.242

1976	6.384	6.179	5.737	5.336	5.148	4.916

1977	6.736	6.48	5.729	5.208	5.116	4.671

1978	6.59	6.375	5.977	5.507	5.269	4.897

1979	6.765	6.537	5.941	5.465	5.472	5.005

1980	6.567	6.334	5.921	5.458	5.261	4.705

1981	7.126	6.843	6.048	5.349	5.114	4.538

1982	5.795	5.694	5.348	5.167	4.986	4.684

1983	6.087	5.886	5.43	4.933	4.805	4.544

1984	7.775	7.621	7.063	6.084	5.708	4.993

1985	7.029	6.84	6.244	5.586	5.383	4.981

1986	10.79	10.18	8.662	6.929	6.375	5.111

1987	7.548	7.283	6.912	6.077	5.76	5.382

1988	5.871	5.71	5.25	4.91	4.959	4.645

1989	6.604	6.361	5.641	5.184	5.098	4.647

1990	5.776	5.572	5.067	4.455	4.316	4.226

Sorted results

Prob.		Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	10.79	10.18	8.662	6.939	6.523	5.382

0.0645161290322581	9.07	8.635	7.659	6.929	6.375	5.36

0.0967741935483871	8.969	8.558	7.571	6.378	6.065	5.242

0.129032258064516	8.118	7.621	7.063	6.084	5.76	5.146

0.161290322580645	7.775	7.591	6.912	6.077	5.708	5.111

0.193548387096774	7.548	7.283	6.291	5.974	5.695	5.005

0.225806451612903	7.191	6.925	6.244	5.828	5.645	4.993

0.258064516129032	7.159	6.846	6.229	5.645	5.51	4.981

0.290322580645161	7.126	6.843	6.122	5.644	5.502	4.916

0.32258064516129	7.091	6.84	6.097	5.64	5.472	4.897

0.354838709677419	7.029	6.838	6.048	5.586	5.447	4.735

0.387096774193548	6.924	6.66	6.042	5.514	5.383	4.705

0.419354838709677	6.885	6.651	6.026	5.507	5.269	4.684

0.451612903225806	6.848	6.604	6.014	5.465	5.261	4.671

0.483870967741936	6.765	6.537	5.977	5.458	5.259	4.663

0.516129032258065	6.736	6.48	5.941	5.372	5.254	4.647

0.548387096774194	6.604	6.375	5.921	5.349	5.148	4.645

0.580645161290323	6.59	6.361	5.816	5.336	5.116	4.642

0.612903225806452	6.567	6.334	5.746	5.215	5.114	4.6

0.645161290322581	6.394	6.179	5.737	5.208	5.098	4.568

0.67741935483871	6.384	6.171	5.729	5.184	5.059	4.544

0.709677419354839	6.373	6.168	5.641	5.167	4.986	4.538

0.741935483870968	6.255	6.038	5.45	5.135	4.959	4.51

0.774193548387097	6.087	5.886	5.43	4.994	4.869	4.491

0.806451612903226	5.911	5.71	5.395	4.933	4.805	4.325

0.838709677419355	5.871	5.703	5.348	4.91	4.742	4.226

0.870967741935484	5.795	5.694	5.25	4.667	4.316	4.074

0.903225806451613	5.776	5.572	5.067	4.455	3.963	2.977

0.935483870967742	5.607	5.268	4.366	3.398	2.948	2.129

0.967741935483871	1.61	1.533	1.335	1.176	1.08	0.5206

0.1		8.8839	8.4643	7.5202	6.3486	6.0345	5.2324

					Average of yearly averages:	4.46425333333333

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: TetraAirNCpeanutsMNDW

Metfile:	w13722.dvf

PRZM scenario:	NCpeanutSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	tetraconazole

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	372.1	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	3.5e-9	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	9.9e-7	torr

Solubility	sol	1560	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	4424	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	215	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	447	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	0	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	0	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI		cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	.112	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	.95	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.16	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	15-06	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	14	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1	apprate	.112	kg/ha

Interval 2	interval	14	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 2	apprate	.112	kg/ha

Interval 3	interval	14	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 3	apprate	.112	kg/ha

Record 17:	FILTRA

	IPSCND

	UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

	PLDKRT	0.053

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

For Peanuts via Ground Application

stored as TetraGrNCpeanutsMNDW.out

Chemical: tetraconazole

PRZM environment: NCpeanutSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 29 May 2007 at 12:58:46

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 15:34:12

Metfile: w13722.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 09:05:50

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	1.376	1.297	1.175	0.8116	0.7126	0.3641

1962	5.476	5.124	4.187	3.183	2.707	1.87

1963	7.999	7.45	5.841	4.416	3.673	2.645

1964	6.914	6.59	5.812	5.316	4.934	3.719

1965	6.498	6.278	5.652	5.343	5.066	4.22

1966	5.785	5.596	5.21	4.793	4.634	4.257

1967	6.312	6.046	5.664	5.145	5.075	4.217

1968	5.896	5.672	5.008	4.6	4.339	4.068

1969	6.102	5.869	5.372	4.962	4.935	4.119

1970	4.944	4.823	4.643	4.428	4.213	3.86

1971	6.005	5.776	5.343	4.786	4.592	4.03

1972	6.262	6.045	5.35	5.044	5.017	4.284

1973	8.244	7.873	6.895	6.267	5.915	4.934

1974	6.15	5.954	5.391	5.224	5.057	4.71

1975	8.295	7.899	6.895	5.724	5.482	4.809

1976	5.962	5.753	5.299	4.906	4.761	4.471

1977	6.309	6.049	5.288	4.771	4.689	4.215

1978	5.744	5.573	5.162	4.775	4.662	4.451

1979	6.326	6.096	5.498	5.014	4.975	4.564

1980	5.874	5.672	5.247	4.727	4.603	4.252

1981	6.793	6.5	5.677	4.962	4.681	4.078

1982	5.453	5.348	4.992	4.682	4.608	4.23

1983	5.76	5.559	5.061	4.556	4.47	4.084

1984	7.033	6.872	6.292	5.419	5.089	4.552

1985	6.713	6.517	5.901	5.134	4.762	4.539

1986	10.43	9.805	8.275	6.502	5.921	4.676

1987	7.173	6.901	6.502	5.667	5.339	4.959

1988	5.491	5.324	4.85	4.483	4.515	4.192

1989	6.029	5.796	5.108	4.691	4.594	4.193

1990	5.389	5.178	4.657	4.032	3.926	3.756

Sorted results

Prob.		Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	10.43	9.805	8.275	6.502	5.921	4.959

0.0645161290322581	8.295	7.899	6.895	6.267	5.915	4.934

0.0967741935483871	8.244	7.873	6.895	5.724	5.482	4.809

0.129032258064516	7.999	7.45	6.502	5.667	5.339	4.71

0.161290322580645	7.173	6.901	6.292	5.419	5.089	4.676

0.193548387096774	7.033	6.872	5.901	5.343	5.075	4.564

0.225806451612903	6.914	6.59	5.841	5.316	5.066	4.552

0.258064516129032	6.793	6.517	5.812	5.224	5.057	4.539

0.290322580645161	6.713	6.5	5.677	5.145	5.017	4.471

0.32258064516129	6.498	6.278	5.664	5.134	4.975	4.451

0.354838709677419	6.326	6.096	5.652	5.044	4.935	4.284

0.387096774193548	6.312	6.049	5.498	5.014	4.934	4.257

0.419354838709677	6.309	6.046	5.391	4.962	4.762	4.252

0.451612903225806	6.262	6.045	5.372	4.962	4.761	4.23

0.483870967741936	6.15	5.954	5.35	4.906	4.689	4.22

0.516129032258065	6.102	5.869	5.343	4.793	4.681	4.217

0.548387096774194	6.029	5.796	5.299	4.786	4.662	4.215

0.580645161290323	6.005	5.776	5.288	4.775	4.634	4.193

0.612903225806452	5.962	5.753	5.247	4.771	4.608	4.192

0.645161290322581	5.896	5.672	5.21	4.727	4.603	4.119

0.67741935483871	5.874	5.672	5.162	4.691	4.594	4.084

0.709677419354839	5.785	5.596	5.108	4.682	4.592	4.078

0.741935483870968	5.76	5.573	5.061	4.6	4.515	4.068

0.774193548387097	5.744	5.559	5.008	4.556	4.47	4.03

0.806451612903226	5.491	5.348	4.992	4.483	4.339	3.86

0.838709677419355	5.476	5.324	4.85	4.428	4.213	3.756

0.870967741935484	5.453	5.178	4.657	4.416	3.926	3.719

0.903225806451613	5.389	5.124	4.643	4.032	3.673	2.645

0.935483870967742	4.944	4.823	4.187	3.183	2.707	1.87

0.967741935483871	1.376	1.297	1.175	0.8116	0.7126	0.3641

0.1		8.2195	7.8307	6.8557	5.7183	5.4677	4.7991

					Average of yearly averages:	4.04393666666667

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: TetraGrNCpeanutsMNDW

Metfile:	w13722.dvf

PRZM scenario:	NCpeanutSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	tetraconazole

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	372.1	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	3.5e-9	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	9.9e-7	torr

Solubility	sol	1560	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	4424	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	215	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	447	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	0	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	0	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI		cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	.112	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	.99	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.064	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	15-06	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	14	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1	apprate	.112	kg/ha

Interval 2	interval	14	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 2	apprate	.112	kg/ha

Interval 3	interval	14	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 3	apprate	.112	kg/ha

Record 17:	FILTRA

	IPSCND

	UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

	PLDKRT	0.053

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

APPENDIX B

SCI-GROW Modeling Output Files

For Sugarbeets

          SCIGROW

                          	        VERSION 2.3

            ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND EFFECTS DIVISION

            	   OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS

             U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                             SCREENING MODEL

                FOR AQUATIC PESTICIDE EXPOSURE

 SciGrow version 2.3

 chemical:tetraconazole

 time is  4/29/2008  14:57:48

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -

  Application      Number of       Total Use    Koc      Soil Aerobic

  rate (lb/acre)  applications   (lb/acre/yr)  (ml/g)   metabolism (days)

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -

      0.100           2.0           0.200      6.70E+02     1000.0

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -

 groundwater screening cond (ppb) =   1.59E-01

 *********************************************************************** *

For Pecans

                          SCIGROW

                          VERSION 2.3

            ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND EFFECTS DIVISION

                 OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS

             U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                        SCREENING MODEL

                FOR AQUATIC PESTICIDE EXPOSURE

 SciGrow version 2.3

 chemical:tetraconazole

 time is  4/29/2008  15: 2:59

6

;

Z

\

–

ž

¾

B*

<

\

|

}

ༀ䂄ᄋ悄ㇺ$葞ୀ葠褐摧੏E᐀¾

Ð

ë

î

ï

ó

"

ð

ò

kdT

l

$

$

$

h!

  h

h

 h

¥ÿ0

¥ÿ0

¥ÿ0

¥ÿ0

¥ÿ0

¥ÿ0

¥ÿ0

¥ÿ0

¥ÿ0

¥ÿ0

¥ÿ0

h2

h2

hÝ

0.100           4.0           0.400      6.70E+02     1000.0

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -

 groundwater screening cond (ppb) =   3.18E-01

 *********************************************************************** *

 For Peanuts

           SCIGROW

                          VERSION 2.3

            ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND EFFECTS DIVISION

                 OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS

             U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                        SCREENING MODEL

                FOR AQUATIC PESTICIDE EXPOSURE

 SciGrow version 2.3

 chemical:tetraconazole

 time is  4/29/2008  15: 5: 0

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -

  Application      Number of       Total Use    Koc      Soil Aerobic

  rate (lb/acre)  applications   (lb/acre/yr)  (ml/g)   metabolism (days)

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -

      0.125           4.0           0.500      6.70E+02     1000.0

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -

 groundwater screening cond (ppb) =   3.97E-01

 **********************************************************************

APPENDIX C

Use Characterization Maps for Tetraconazole

 PAGE

 PAGE   2


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 217 (Monday, November 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63015-63016]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24829]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP22-11-000]

Texas Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice of Request Under Blanket
Authorization and Establishing Intervention and Protest Deadline

    Take notice that on October 27, 2021, Texas Gas Transmission, LLC
(Texas Gas), 9 Greenway Plaza, Houston, Texas, 77046, filed in the
above referenced docket a prior notice pursuant to Section 157.205 and
157.208(b) of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations
under the Natural Gas Act and the blanket certificate issued by the
Commission in Docket No. CP82-407-000,\1\ seeking authorization to
perform the New Canada Road MLS Relocation Project in Shelby County,
Tennessee. Specifically, Texas Gas requests to perform a miscellaneous
rearrangement project involving the offset replacement of: (i) Two
segments of existing 26-inch-diameter natural gas pipelines (Main Line
System (MLS) 26-1 and MLS 26-2), (ii) one segment of 30-inch-diameter
natural gas pipeline (MLS 30-1), and (iii) one segment of 36-inch-
diameter natural gas pipeline (MLS 36-1) where they cross Canada Road
in Shelby County, Tennessee. Texas Gas is proposing this Project in
response to the Tennessee Department of Transportation New Canada Road
Project and the estimated cost of the project is $15 million, all as
more fully set forth in the request which is on file with the
Commission and open to public inspection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Texas Gas Transmission Corp., 20 FERC  62,417
(1982).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://ferc.gov) using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions concerning this application should be directed to
Juan Eligio, Jr., Manager of Regulatory Affairs, Texas Gas
Transmission, LLC, 9 Greenway Plaza, Houston, Texas 77046, at (713)
479-3480, or by email to [email protected]. Question may also
be directed to Payton Barrientos, Sr. Regulatory Analyst, Texas Gas
Transmission, LLC, 9 Greenway Plaza, Houston, Texas 77046, at (713)
479-8157, or by email to [email protected].

Public Participation

    There are three ways to become involved in the Commission's review
of this project: You can file a protest to the project, you can file a
motion to intervene in the proceeding, and you can file comments on the
project. There is no fee or cost for filing protests, motions to
intervene, or comments. The deadline for filing protests, motions to
intervene, and comments is 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 7, 2021.
How to file protests, motions to intervene, and comments is explained
below.

Protests

    Pursuant to section 157.205 of the Commission's regulations under
the NGA,\2\ any person \3\ or the Commission's staff may file a protest
to the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed or if a
protest is filed and then withdrawn within 30 days after the allowed
time for filing a protest, the proposed activity shall be deemed to be
authorized effective the day after the time allowed for protest. If a
protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time
allowed for filing a protest, the instant request for authorization
will be considered by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 18 CFR 157.205.
    \3\ Persons include individuals, organizations, businesses,
municipalities, and other entities. 18 CFR 385.102(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Protests must comply with the requirements specified in section
157.205(e) of the Commission's regulations,\4\ and must be submitted by
the protest deadline, which is January 7, 2021. A protest may also
serve as a motion to intervene so long as the protestor states it also
seeks to be an intervenor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 18 CFR 157.205(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Interventions

    Any person has the option to file a motion to intervene in this
proceeding. Only intervenors have the right to request rehearing of
Commission orders issued in this proceeding and to subsequently
challenge the Commission's orders in the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal.
    To intervene, you must submit a motion to intervene to the
Commission in accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure \5\ and the regulations under the NGA \6\ by the
intervention deadline for the project, which is January 7, 2021. As
described further in Rule 214, your motion to intervene must state, to
the extent known, your position regarding the proceeding, as well as
your interest in the proceeding. For an individual, this could include
your status as a landowner, ratepayer, resident of an impacted
community, or recreationist. You do not need to have property directly
impacted by the project in order to intervene. For more information
about motions to intervene, refer to the FERC website at https://www.ferc.gov/resources/guides/how-to/intervene.asp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 18 CFR 385.214.
    \6\ 18 CFR 157.10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    All timely, unopposed motions to intervene are automatically
granted by operation of Rule 214(c)(1). Motions to intervene that are
filed after the intervention deadline are untimely and may be denied.
Any late-filed motion to intervene must show good cause for being late
and must explain why the time limitation should be waived and provide
justification by reference to factors set forth in Rule 214(d) of the
Commission's Rules and Regulations. A person obtaining party status
will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary of the
Commission and will receive copies (paper or electronic) of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties.

Comments

    Any person wishing to comment on the project may do so. The
Commission considers all comments received about the project in
determining the appropriate action to be taken. To ensure that your
comments are timely and properly recorded, please submit your comments
on or before January 7, 2021. The filing of a comment alone will not
serve to make the filer a party to the

proceeding. To become a party, you must intervene in the proceeding.

How To File Protests, Interventions, and Comments

    There are two ways to submit protests, motions to intervene, and
comments. In both instances, please reference the Project docket number
CP22-11-000 in your submission.
    (1) You may file your protest, motion to intervene, and comments by
using the Commission's eFiling feature, which is located on the
Commission's website (www.ferc.gov) under the link to Documents and
Filings. New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking on
``eRegister.'' You will be asked to select the type of filing you are
making; first select General'' and then select ``Protest'',
``Intervention'', or ``Comment on a Filing.'' The Commission's eFiling
staff are available to assist you at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
[email protected]
    (2) You can file a paper copy of your submission. Your submission
must reference the Project docket number CP22-11-000.
    To mail via USPS, use the following address: Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426.
    To mail via any other courier, use the following address: Kimberly
D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins
Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Protests and motions to intervene must be served on the applicant
either by mail or email (with a link to the document) at: Texas Gas
Transmission LLC, 9 Greenwat Plaza, Houston, Texas 77046, or by email
to [email protected] and by email to
[email protected] Any subsequent submissions by an
intervenor must be served on the applicant and all other parties to the
proceeding. Contact information for parties can be downloaded from the
service list at the eService link on FERC Online.

Tracking the Proceeding

    Throughout the proceeding, additional information about the project
will be available from the Commission's Office of External Affairs, at
(866) 208-FERC, or on the FERC website at www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link as described above. The eLibrary link also provides
access to the texts of all formal documents issued by the Commission,
such as orders, notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. For more information and to register, go to
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.

    Dated: November 8, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-24829 Filed 11-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


? Need to return call by / at/ between and . Signature: Project No.: 0<IP_ADDRESS>   DISTRIBUTION Page ___ of _

Project Name: 304( m)

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD Outgoing Call Date: 6/ 29/ 05 Time: 12: 15 PM EST Company Name: Tesoro Northwest Co. Anacortes, WA Contact Name: Rebecca Spurling Phone No.: ( 360) 293 1664 Name: TJ Finseth Eastern Research Group GENERAL SUBJECT : Tesoro Northwest Dioxin Discharges in TRI 2002.

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN On Tuesday May 31, 2005, at 11: 30 AM EST I called Mr. Tom Hanich, ( 360) 293 9126. Mr. Hanich's voicemail said that he would be out of the office until June 2, 2005.

On Tuesday May 31, 2005, at 11: 45 AM EST I left a message for Ms. Rebecca Spurling asking her to call me.

On Thursday June 2, 2005, at 12: 30 PM EST Ms. Spurling called and told me that Tesoro Northwest collected new data since 2000, and that she would send it to me.

On Monday June 6, 2005 at 4: 45 PM EST I left a message for Ms. Spurling asking if she had found the information yet.

On Thursday June 9, 2005 at 1: 45 PM EST Ms. Spurling called to tell me that she would be sending me the information either that day or the next.

On Monday June 13, 2005 at 1: 00 PM EST Ms. Spurling called to tell me that she had data for 2001 but not from 2002. She said that the data for 2001 was the information used for the TRI 2002 reporting. Ms. Spurling said that she would send me the 2001 data.

On Monday June 13, 2005 at 1: 15 PM EST Ms. Spurling faxed me the 2001 dioxin data collected by the facility. The facility collected two samples during 2001, March and October, and each of these samples was analyzed by two different labs. Therefore, there were four different sets of data provided by the facility. The facility also had four different sets of data for 2000, that was provided during the 2004 detailed study.

On Wednesday June 29, 2005 at 12: 15 PM EST I contacted Ms. Spurling to determine how the dioxin data was used to calculate the estimated TRI discharge. Ms. Spurling told me that for any congener that was not detected by any of the sets of data for 2000 and 2001, the non detects were treated as zero. For any congener that was detected at least once during any of the 2000 and 2001 monitoring data, the non detects were treated as ½ the ? Need to return call by / at/ between and . Signature: detection limit. For any values that were reported as present, but below the calibration curve, the estimated value was used. Although the 2000 and 2001 data were used to determine how to treat the non detects, only the 2001 data used to estimate the 2002 discharges.

The facility calculated its reported dioxin mass by averaging the four concentrations for the 2001 data for each congener, adding the average concentrations together, and multiplying by the total yearly effluent flow rate. Ms. Spurling told me that the total effluent flow rate for 2002 was 1,008,596,000 gallons/ yr. Ms. Spurling also told me that the dioxin distribution reported for the TRI 2002 release reflects the discharges from all media, not just wastewater.


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 207 (Thursday, October 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 53880]
[FR Doc No: 2018-23308]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-1262]

Issuance of Priority Review Voucher; Rare Pediatric Disease
Product

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
issuance of a priority review voucher to the sponsor of a rare
pediatric disease product application. The Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), as amended by the Food and Drug Administration
Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA), authorizes FDA to award priority
review vouchers to sponsors of approved rare pediatric disease product
applications that meet certain criteria. FDA is required to publish
notice of the award of the priority review voucher. FDA has determined
that REVCOVI (elapegademase-lvlr) Injection, manufactured by Leadiant
Bioscience Inc., meets the criteria for a priority review voucher.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Althea Cuff, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>, Fax: 301-
796-9856, email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is announcing the issuance of a priority
review voucher to the sponsor of an approved rare pediatric disease
product application. Under section 529 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360ff), which was added by FDASIA, FDA will award priority review
vouchers to sponsors of approved rare pediatric disease product
applications that meet certain criteria. FDA has determined that
REVCOVI (elapegademase-lvlr) Injection, manufactured by Leadiant
Bioscience Inc., meets the criteria for a priority review voucher.
REVCOVI (elapegademase-lvlr) Injection is indicated for the treatment
of Adenosine Deaminase-Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (ADA-SCID) in
pediatric and adult patients.
    For further information about the Rare Pediatric Disease Priority
Review Voucher Program and for a link to the full text of section 529
of the FD&C Act, go to https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DevelopingProductsforRareDiseasesConditions/RarePediatricDiseasePriorityVoucherProgram/default.htm. For further
information about REVCOVI (elapegademase-lvlr) Injection, go to the
``[email protected]'' website at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/.

    Dated: October 22, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-23308 Filed 10-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 13, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9201-9202]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04649]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Release From Federal Surplus Property and Grant
Assurance Obligations at the New Castle County Airport (ILG),
Wilmington, DE

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) DOT.

ACTION: Notice of request to release airport land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the
application for a release of approximately 1.0719 acres of federally
obligated airport property at New Castle County Airport (ILG),
Wilmington, DE, from the National Emergency Use Provision contained in
a Surplus Property Agreement, dated April 28, 1949, and from
conditions, reservations, and restrictions contained in Airport
Improvement Program grants that would restrict the use of said land to
aeronautical purposes. The request includes 0.8994 acres of land to be
released for disposal for a Right-Of-Way and 0.1725 acres be released
from aeronautical to non-aeronautical use for a Permanent Easement.
This acreage is a portion of the land at New Castle County Airport that
is subject to the Surplus Property Agreement. Both releases are
requested to permit improvements, including the widening of State Route
141. The proposed use of land after the release will be compatible with
the airport and will not interfere with the airport or its operation.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 12, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to
the following address: Jim Salmon, Public Information Officer, Delaware
River and Bay Authority, P.O. Box 71, New Castle, DE. And at the FAA
Harrisburg Airports District Office: Rick Harner, Acting Manager,
Harrisburg Airports District Office, 3905 Hartzdale Dr., Suite 508,
Camp Hill, PA 17011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Gearhart, Project Manager,
Harrisburg Airports District Office, location listed above. The request
to release airport property may be reviewed in person at this same
location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the Wendell H. Ford
Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21),
Public Law 106-181 (Apr. 5, 2000; 114 Stat. 61), this notice must be
published in the Federal Register 30 days before the Secretary may
waive any condition imposed on a federally obligated airport by surplus
property conveyance deeds or grant agreements. The following is a brief
overview of the request:
    The Airport Authority requests the release of a total of 0.8994
acres for sale required for Right-of-Way for the State Route 141
widening project, and 0.1725 acres for change in use for a Permanent
Easement. The purpose of the project is to address safety, operational,
capacity and condition needs within the State Route 141 and Interstate
95 interchange area. Specifically, State Route 141 is being widened to
accommodate three lanes of traffic in each direction near the New
Castle County Airport and the airport property is needed at the
intersection of Commons Boulevard and State Route 141. The project is
being coordinated by the Delaware Department of Transportation. There
are two parcels included in the proposed total 1.0719-acre land release
obtained from the United States pursuant to the Surplus Property Act of
1944 and the Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1947. The existing property
use is that of

dedicated airport property. As shown on the Airport Layout Plan, the
property is not needed now or in the future for airport development as
it is small areas running adjacent to the existing State Route 141. The
proposed use of the property will not interfere with the airport or its
operation. Proceeds from sale of the property will be utilized in
accordance with FAA's Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use of
Airport Revenue, published in the Federal Register on February 16,
1999.
    Interested persons are invited to comment on the proposed lease.
All comments will be considered by the FAA to the extent practicable.

    Issued in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, March 7, 2019.
Rick Harner,
Acting Manager, Harrisburg Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 2019-04649 Filed 3-12-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6032-6033]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02021]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4251-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2016-0001]

Alabama; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Alabama (FEMA-4251-DR), dated January 21,
2016, and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: January 21, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated January 21, 2016, the President issued a major disaster
declaration under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the
``Stafford Act''), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State
of Alabama resulting from severe storms, tornadoes, straight-line
winds, and flooding during the period of December 23-31, 2015, is of
sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a major disaster
declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford
Act''). Therefore, I declare that such a major disaster exists in
the State of Alabama.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Public Assistance in the
designated areas and Hazard Mitigation throughout the State.
Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance be
supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Hazard Mitigation will be limited to 75 percent of the total
eligible costs. Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Public Assistance also will be limited to 75 percent of the total
eligible costs, with the exception of projects that meet the
eligibility criteria for a higher Federal cost-sharing percentage
under the Public Assistance Alternative Procedures Pilot Program for
Debris Removal implemented pursuant to section 428 of the Stafford
Act.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under
Executive Order 12148, as amended, Elizabeth Turner, of FEMA is
appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major
disaster.
    The following areas of the State of Alabama have been designated as
adversely affected by this major disaster:

    Autauga, Barbour, Blount, Bullock, Butler, Chambers, Cherokee,
Clay, Cleburne, Coffee, Colbert, Conecuh, Covington, Crenshaw,
Cullman, Dale, DeKalb, Elmore, Escambia, Fayette, Franklin, Geneva,
Henry, Houston, Jackson, Lamar, Lawrence, Lee, Lowndes, Macon,
Marion, Marshall, Monroe, Perry, Pike, Russell, St. Clair, Walker,
and Winston Counties for Public Assistance.
    All areas within the State of Alabama are eligible for
assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals

and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance
to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster
Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters);
97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2016-02021 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 236 (Monday, December 11, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 85963]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27145]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-558, OMB Control No. 3235-0617]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Rule 433

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved
collection of information discussed below.
    Rule 433 (17 CFR 230.433) governs the use and filing of free
writing prospectuses under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et
seq.). The purpose of Rule 433 is to reduce the restrictions on
communications that an issuer can make to investors during a registered
offering of its securities, while maintaining important investor
protections. A free writing prospectus meeting the conditions of Rule
433(d)(1) must be filed with the Commission and is publicly available.
We estimate that it takes approximately 2.44764 hours per response to
prepare a free writing prospectus and that approximately 20,179
responses are filed per year for a total internal burden of 49,391
hours (2.4476 hours per response x 20,179 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Find this
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice
by January 10, 2024 to (i) www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and (ii)
David Bottom, Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, or by sending an email to: [email protected].

    Dated: December 6, 2023.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-27145 Filed 12-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 15, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81267-81268]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27480]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2020-0108; Notice 1]

Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming
Model Year 2014-2018 Chevrolet 2500 Trucks Are Eligible for Importation

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Receipt of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) receipt of a petition for a decision that model
year (MY) 2014-2018 Chevrolet 2500 Trucks (TKs) that were not
originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal motor
vehicle safety standards (FMVSS) with a GVWR range of 6,600-7,200 lbs,
are eligible for importation into the United States because they are
substantially similar to vehicles that were originally manufactured for
sale in the United States and that were certified by their manufacturer
as complying with the safety standards (the U.S.-certified version of
the 2014-2018 Chevrolet Silverado TKs) and are capable of being readily
altered to conform to the standards.

DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is January 14,
2021.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
     Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
except for Federal Holidays.
     Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Comments may also be faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard along with
the comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided.
    All comments and supporting materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the

closing date will also be filed and will be considered to the fullest
extent possible.
    All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID number for this petition is shown
in the heading of this notice.
    DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Mazurowski, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, NHTSA<PHONE_NUMBER>).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not
originally manufactured to conform to all applicable FMVSS shall be
refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that
the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle
originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United
States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same MY as the
model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all applicable FMVSS.
    Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either
manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to
49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice
of each petition that it receives in the Federal Register and affords
interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the
close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is
eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in
the Federal Register.
    Diversified Vehicle Services Inc. (DVS), (Registered Importer R-98-
165), of Indianapolis, Indiana has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether
nonconforming 2014-2018 Chevrolet 2500 TKs are eligible for importation
into the United States. The vehicles which DVS believes are
substantially similar are MY 2014-2018 Chevrolet Silverado TKs sold in
the United States and certified by their manufacturer as conforming to
all applicable FMVSS.
    The petitioner claims that it compared non-U.S. certified MY 2014-
2018 Chevrolet 2500 TKs to their U.S. certified counterparts and found
the vehicles to be substantially similar with respect to compliance
with most FMVSS.
    DVS submitted information with its petition intended to demonstrate
that non-U.S. certified MY 2014-2018 Chevrolet 2500 TKs, as originally
manufactured, conform to many applicable FMVSS in the same manner as
their U.S.-certified counterparts, or are capable of being readily
altered to conform to those standards. Specifically, the petitioner
claims that the non-U.S. certified MY 2014-2018 Chevrolet 2500 TKs, as
originally manufactured, conform to: FMVSS Nos.102, Transmission Shift
Position Sequence, Starter Interlock, and Transmission Braking Effect,
103, Windshield Defrosting and Defogging Systems, 104, Windshield
Wiping and Washing Systems, 106, Brake Hoses, 108, Lamps, Reflective
Devices, and Associated Equipment, 110, Tire Selection and Rims and
Motor Home/Recreation Vehicle Trailer Load Carrying Capacity
Information for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536 kilograms (10,000
pounds) or Less, 111, Rear Visibility, 113, Hood Latch System, 114,
Theft Protection, 116, Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids, 118, Power-Operated
Window, Partition, and Roof Panel System, 119, New Pneumatic Tires,
124, Accelerator Control Systems, 126, Electronic Stability Control
Systems For Light Vehicles, 135, Light Vehicle Brake Systems, 138, Tire
Pressure Monitoring Systems, 201, Occupant Protection in Interior
Impact, 202, Head Restraints; Mandatory Applicability Begins on
September 1, 2009, 203, Impact Protection for the Driver from the
Steering Control System, 204, Steering Control Rearward Displacement,
205, Glazing Materials, 206, Door Locks and Door Retention Components,
207, Seating Systems, 208, Occupant Crash Protection, 209, Seat Belt
Assemblies, 210, Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages, 212, Windshield
Mounting, 213, Child Restraint Systems, 214, Side Impact Protection,
216, Roof Crush Resistance; Applicable Unless a Vehicle is Certified to
Sec.  571.216a, 219, Windshield Zone Intrusion, 301, Fuel System
Integrity, 302, Flammability of Interior Materials, 49 CFR part 541,
Theft Prevention, and, 49 CFR part 565 VIN Requirements.
    The petitioner also contends that the subject non-U.S. certified
vehicles are capable of being readily altered to meet the following
FMVSS, in the manner indicated:
    FMVSS No. 101, Controls and Displays: The instrument cluster will
require the addition of the word ``BRAKE''.
    The petitioner additionally states a reference and certification
label will need to be added to the left front door post area to meet
the requirements of 49 CFR part 567.

(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), (a)(1)(B), and (b)(1); 49 CFR
593.7; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.)

Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020-27480 Filed 12-14-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P