[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44069-44070]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17777]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Rule 19a-1.
    SEC File No. 270-240, OMB Control No. 3235-0216.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the
collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to
submit this existing collection of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension and approval.
    Section 19(a) (15 U.S.C. 80a-19(a)) of the Investment Company Act
of 1940 (the ``Act'') \1\ makes it unlawful for any registered
investment company to pay any dividend or similar distribution from any
source other than the company's net income, unless the payment is
accompanied by a written statement to the company's shareholders which
adequately discloses the sources of the payment. Section 19(a)
authorizes the Commission to prescribe the form of such statement by
rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 80a.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 19a-1 (17 CFR 270.19a-1) under the Act, entitled ``Written
Statement to Accompany Dividend Payments by Management Companies,''
sets forth specific requirements for the information that must be
included in statements made pursuant to section 19(a) by or on behalf
of management companies.\2\ The rule requires that the statement
indicate what portions of distribution payments are made from net
income, net profits from the sale of a security or other property
(``capital gains'') and paid-in capital. When any part of the payment
is made from capital gains, Rule 19a-1 also requires that the statement
disclose certain other information relating to the appreciation or
depreciation of portfolio securities. If an estimated portion is
subsequently determined to be significantly inaccurate, a correction
must be made on a statement made pursuant to section 19(a) or in the
first report to shareholders following the discovery of the inaccuracy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Section 4(3) of the Act (15 U.S. C. 80a-4(3)) defines
``management company'' as ``any investment company other than a face
amount certificate company or a unit investment trust.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The purpose of Rule 19a-1 is to afford fund shareholders adequate
disclosure of the sources from which distribution payments are made.
The rule is intended to prevent shareholders from confusing income
dividends with distributions made from capital sources. Absent Rule
19a-1, shareholders might receive a false impression of fund gains.
    Based on a review of filings made with the Commission, the staff
estimates that approximately 11,066 series of registered investment
companies that are management companies may be subject to Rule 19a-1
each year,\3\ and that each portfolio on average mails two statements
per year to meet the requirements of the rule.\4\ The staff further
estimates that the time needed to make the determinations required by
the rule and to prepare the statement required under the rule is
approximately 1 hour per statement. The total annual burden for all
portfolios therefore is estimated to be approximately 22,132 burden
hours.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ This estimate is based on statistics compiled by Commission
staff as of May 31, 2014. The number of management investment
company portfolios that make distributions for which compliance with
Rule 19a-1 is required depends on a wide range of factors and can
vary greatly across years. Therefore, the calculation of estimated
burden hours is based on the total number of management investment
company portfolios, each of which may be subject to Rule 19a-1.
    \4\ A few portfolios make monthly distributions from sources
other than net income, so the rule requires them to send out a
statement 12 times a year. Other portfolios never make such
distributions.
    \5\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: 11,066
management investment company portfolios x 2 statements per year x 1
hour per statement = 22,132 burden hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The staff estimates that approximately one-third of the total
annual burden (7,377 hours) would be incurred by a paralegal with an
average hourly wage rate of approximately $199 per hour,\6\ and
approximately two-thirds of the annual burden (14,755 hours) would be
incurred by a compliance clerk with an average hourly wage rate of $64
per

hour.\7\ The staff therefore estimates that the aggregate annual cost
of complying with the paperwork requirements of the rule is
approximately $2,412,343 ((7,377 hours x $199 = $1,468,023) + (14,755
hours x $64 = $944,320)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Hourly rates are derived from the Securities Industry and
Financial Markets Association (``SIFMA''), Management and
Professional Earnings in the Securities Industry 2013, modified to
account for an 1800-hour work-year and multiplied by 5.35 to account
for bonuses, firm size, employee benefits, and overhead.
    \7\ Hourly rates are derived from SIFMA's Office Salaries in the
Securities Industry 2013, modified to account for an 1800-hour work-
year and multiplied by 2.93 to account for bonuses, firm size,
employee benefits and overhead.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To comply with state law, many investment companies already must
distinguish the different sources from which a shareholder distribution
is paid and disclose that information to shareholders. Thus, many
investment companies would be required to distinguish the sources of
shareholder dividends whether or not the Commission required them to do
so under Rule 19a-1.
    The estimate of average burden hours is made solely for the
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, and is not derived from a
comprehensive or even a representative survey or study of the costs of
Commission rules. Compliance with the collection of information
required by Rule 19a-1 is mandatory for management companies that make
statements to shareholders pursuant to section 19(a) of the Act. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid control number.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the collections of
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the Commission, including whether the information has practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burdens
of the collections of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burdens of the collections of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Thomas Bayer, Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549; or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: July 23, 2014.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-17777 Filed 7-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 26, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29970-29972]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12488]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2014-0883; FRL-9928-15-Region 3]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Determination of Attainment of the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard for the Baltimore, Maryland Serious
Nonattainment Area

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has determined that
the Baltimore, Maryland Serious Nonattainment Area (Baltimore Area) has
attained the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS). This determination is based upon complete, quality-assured,
and certified ambient air monitoring data that shows the Baltimore Area
has monitored attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the 2012-
2014 monitoring period. EPA is finding the Baltimore Area to be in
attainment in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).

DATES: This final rule is effective on June 25, 2015.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2014-0883. All documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Shandruk,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On July 18, 1997, EPA revised the health-based NAAQS for ozone
based on 8-hour average concentrations. 62 FR 38856. The 8-hour
averaging period replaced the previous 1-hour averaging period, and the
level of the NAAQS was changed from 0.12 parts per million (ppm) to
0.08 ppm. Id. On April 30, 2004 (69 FR 23858), EPA finalized its
attainment/nonattainment designations for areas across the country for
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. These actions became effective on June 15,
2004. Among those nonattainment areas was the Baltimore Area
(specifically, Anne Arundel County, Baltimore City, Baltimore County,
Carroll County, Harford County, and Howard County), which was
designated as a moderate ozone nonattainment area. Id. Later, the
Baltimore Area was reclassified as a serious nonattainment area for the
1997 ozone NAAQS. 77 FR 4901 (February 1, 2012). See 40 CFR 81.321. Air
quality monitoring data from the 2012-2014 monitoring period indicate
that the Baltimore Area is now attaining the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
On March 25, 2015 (80 FR 15711), EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of Maryland. In the NPR, EPA proposed to
determine that the Baltimore Area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS.
    Under the provisions of EPA's ozone implementation rule (40 CFR
51.918), if EPA issues a determination that an area is attaining the
relevant standard (through a rulemaking that includes public notice and
comment), it will suspend the area's obligations to submit an
attainment demonstration, reasonably available control measures (RACM),
reasonable further progress (RFP) plan, contingency measures and other
planning requirements related to attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS for as long as the area continues to attain the standard. This
suspension remains in effect until such time, if ever, that EPA (i)
redesignates the area to attainment at which time those requirements no
longer apply, or (ii) subsequently determines that the area has
violated the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Although these requirements are
suspended, EPA is not precluded from acting upon these elements at any
time if submitted to EPA for review and approval. The determination of
attainment is not equivalent to a redesignation under section 107(d)(3)
of the CAA. The designation status of the Baltimore Area will remain
nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS until such time as EPA
determines that the Baltimore Area meets the CAA requirements for
redesignation to attainment, including an approved maintenance plan.
Additionally, the determination of attainment is separate from, and
does not influence or otherwise affect, any future designation
determination or requirements for the Baltimore Area based on any new
or revised ozone NAAQS, and it remains in effect regardless of whether
EPA designates the Baltimore Area as a nonattainment area for purposes
of any new or revised ozone NAAQS.

II. EPA's Evaluation

    EPA has reviewed the complete, quality-assured and certified ozone
ambient air monitoring data for the monitoring period for 2012-2014 for
the Baltimore Area. The design values for each monitor for the years
2012-2014 are less than or equal to 0.084 ppm, and all monitors meet
the data completeness requirements (see Table 1). Based on this 2012-
2014 data from the Air Quality System (AQS) database and consistent
with the requirements contained in 40 CFR part 50, EPA has concluded
that the Baltimore Area attained the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Other
specific requirements and the rationale for EPA's proposed action are
explained in the NPR and will not be

restated here. No public comments were received on the NPR.

    Table 1--2012-2014 Baltimore Area 1997 8-Hour Ozone Design Values
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      Average  percent      2012-2014
             Monitor ID                   (%) data        Design value
                                        completeness          (ppm)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
24-003-0014.........................                97             0.074
24-005-1007.........................                95             0.072
24-005-3001.........................                99             0.072
24-013-0001.........................                99             0.069
24-025-1001.........................                98             0.075
24-025-9001.........................                96             0.073
24-510-0054.........................                90             0.064
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The data in Table 1 are available in EPA's AQS database. The AQS
report with this data is available in the docket for this rulemaking
under docket number EPA-R03-OAR-2014-0883 and available online at
www.regulations.gov, docket number EPA-R03-OAR-2014-0883.

III. Final Action

    EPA has determined that the Baltimore Area has attained the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS. This determination is based upon complete, quality-
assured, and certified ambient air monitoring data that show the
Baltimore Area has monitored attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
for the 2012-2014 monitoring period. This determination suspends the
requirement for the Baltimore Area to submit an attainment
demonstration, RACM, a RFP plan, contingency measures, and other
planning requirements related to attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS for so long as the Baltimore Area continues to attain the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS. Although these requirements are suspended, EPA is not
precluded from acting upon these elements at any time if submitted to
EPA for review and approval. Finalizing this determination does not
constitute a redesignation of the Baltimore Area to attainment for the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS under CAA section 107(d)(3). This determination
of attainment also does not involve approving any maintenance plan for
the Baltimore Area and does not determine that the Baltimore Area has
met all the requirements for redesignation under the CAA, including
that the attainment be due to permanent and enforceable measures.
Therefore, the designation status of the Baltimore Area will remain
nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS until such time as EPA
takes final rulemaking action to determine that the Baltimore Area
meets the CAA requirements for redesignation to attainment.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    This action makes a determination of attainment based on air
quality, and will result in the suspension of certain Federal
requirements, and will not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by July 27, 2015. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action.
    This action determining that the Baltimore Area has attained the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS may not be

challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See
section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: May 13, 2015.
William C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart V--Maryland

0
2. In Sec.  52.1082, paragraph (h) is added to read as follows:

Sec.  52.1082  Determinations of attainment.

* * * * *
    (h) EPA has determined, as of May 26, 2015, that based on 2012 to
2014 ambient air quality data, the Baltimore nonattainment area has
attained the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This determination, in accordance
with 40 CFR 51.1118, suspends the requirement for this area to submit
an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control
measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and
other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for as long
as this area continues to meet the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.

[FR Doc. 2015-12488 Filed 5-22-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 1 (Monday, January 4, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24-27]
[FR Doc No: 2015-32903]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2015-8135; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-106-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 767-200, -300, and -400ER series
airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by multiple reports of un-
commanded escape slide inflation. This proposed AD would require
modifying the regulator valves of the forward entry door, forward
service door, aft entry door, and aft service door, and as applicable,
modifying the regulator valves of the mid entry door and mid service
door. We are proposing this AD to prevent out-of-tolerance trigger
mechanism components (sector and sear) in the regulator valves, which
can produce insufficient trigger engagement and reduced pull force
values, possibly leading to un-commanded deployment of the slide during
normal airplane maintenance or operation, and could result in injury to
passengers and crew, damage to equipment, and the slide becoming
unusable in an emergency evacuation.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by February 18,
2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone: 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057-3356. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2015-8135.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
8135; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly DeVoe, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 425-917-
6590; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-8135;
Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-106-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We received reports of two incidents of un-commanded escape slide
inflation. In both cases, out-of-tolerance trigger mechanism components
(sector and sear) were found in the regulator valves which produced
insufficient trigger engagement and reduced pull force values. This
condition, if not corrected, could result in possible un-commanded
deployment of the slide during normal airplane maintenance or operation
and could result in injury to passengers and crew, damage to equipment,
and the slide becoming unusable in an emergency evacuation.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin 767-25-0548, Revision 1, dated
April 23, 2015. The service information describes procedures for
modifying the regulator valves of the forward entry door, forward
service door, aft entry door, aft service door, mid entry door and mid
service door. The modification includes replacing the existing trigger
mechanism sector and sear of the regulator valve with new trigger
mechanism sector and sear. This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section of this NPRM.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information identified previously. For information on
the procedures and compliance times, see this service information at
http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2015-8135.

Explanation of ``RC'' Steps in Service Information

    The FAA worked in conjunction with industry, under the
Airworthiness Directive Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee
(ARC), to enhance the AD system. One enhancement was a new process for
annotating which steps in the service information are required for
compliance with an AD. Differentiating these steps from other tasks in
the service information is expected to improve an owner's/operator's
understanding of crucial AD requirements and help provide consistent
judgment in AD compliance. The steps identified as Required for
Compliance (RC) in any service information identified previously have a
direct effect on detecting, preventing, resolving, or eliminating an
identified unsafe condition.
    For service information that contains steps that are labeled as RC,
the following provisions apply: (1) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures identified in an RC step,
must be done to comply with the AD, and an AMOC

is required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures; and (2) steps not labeled as RC may be deviated
from using accepted methods in accordance with the operator's
maintenance or inspection program without obtaining approval of an
AMOC, provided the RC steps, including substeps and identified figures,
can still be done as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an
airworthy condition.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 302 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement of trigger mechanism        15 work-hours x $85 per           $2,236          $3,511      $1,060,322
 components--forward and aft entry/      hour = $1,275.
 service doors.
Replacement of trigger mechanism        8 work-hours x $85 per             1,118           1,798         542,996
 components--mid entry/service doors.    hour = $680.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2015-8135; Directorate Identifier
2015-NM-106-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by February 18, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 767-200, -300, and -
400ER series airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified
in Boeing Service Bulletin 767-25-0548, Revision 1, dated April 23,
2015.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 25, Equipment/
furnishings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by multiple reports of un-commanded escape
slide inflation. We are issuing this AD to prevent out-of-tolerance
trigger mechanism components (sector and sear) in the regulator
valves, which can produce insufficient trigger engagement and
reduced pull force values, possibly leading to un-commanded
deployment of the slide during normal airplane maintenance or
operation, and could result in injury to passengers and crew, damage
to equipment, and the slide becoming unusable in an emergency
evacuation.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Replacement of the Trigger Mechanism Sector and Sear

    Within 42 months after the effective date of this AD, modify the
regulator valves of the forward entry door, forward service door,
aft entry door, and aft service door, and as applicable, modify the
regulator valves of the mid entry door and mid service door, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service
Bulletin 767-25-0548, Revision 1, dated April 23, 2015.

(h) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for the modification required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, if the modification was performed before
the effective date of this AD using Boeing Service Bulletin 767-25-
0548, dated November 5, 2014, which is not incorporated by reference
in this AD.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (j)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair

method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis
of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this
AD.
    (4) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as Required for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs
(i)(4)(i) and (i)(4)(ii) apply.
    (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. An AMOC is required for any deviations to RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures.
    (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.

(j) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Kimberly DeVoe,
Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch,
ANM-150S, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:
425-917-6495; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone: 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, WA, on December 21, 2015.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-32903 Filed 12-31-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 13003]
[FR Doc No: 2023-04125]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-96969; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2022-077]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 4702 To Establish New ``Contra
Midpoint Only'' and ``Contra Midpoint Only With Post-Only'' Order Types

February 23, 2023.
    On December 22, 2022, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to
amend Rule 4702 to establish new ``Contra Midpoint Only'' and ``Contra
Midpoint Only with Post-Only'' order types. The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the Federal Register on January 11,
2023.\3\ The Commission received comment on the proposed rule
change.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 96601 (Jan. 5,
2023), 88 FR 1616.
    \4\ Comment received by the Commission on the proposed rule
change is available on the Commission's website at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nasdaq-2022-077/srnasdaq2022077.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \5\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding, or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change
is February 25, 2023. The Commission is extending this 45-day time
period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that it has
sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change and comment
received. Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of
the Act,\6\ designates April 11, 2023 as the date by which the
Commission shall either approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings
to determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No.
SR-NASDAQ-2022-077).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-04125 Filed 2-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11489-11490]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4614]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0002]

Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and
recommendations to the Agency on FDA's regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on April 12, 2011, from 8
a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Location: FDA White Oak Campus, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Building
31 Conference Center, the Great Room (rm. 1503), Silver Spring, MD
20993-0002. Information regarding special accommodations due to a
disability, visitor parking and transportation may be accessed at:
http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm; under the heading
``Resources for You,'' click on ``White Oak Conference Center Parking
and Transportation Information for FDA Advisory Committee Meetings.''
Please note that visitors to the White Oak Campus must enter through
Building 1.
    Contact Person: Caleb Briggs, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
31, rm. 2417, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>, FAX: 301-847-
8533, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or FDA Advisory Committee
Information Line, 1-800-741-8138<PHONE_NUMBER> in the Washington, DC
area), and follow the prompts to the desired center or product area.
Please call the Information Line for up-to-date information on this
meeting. A notice in the Federal Register about last minute
modifications that impact a previously announced advisory committee
meeting cannot always be published quickly enough to provide timely
notice. Therefore, you should always check the Agency's Web site and
call the appropriate advisory committee hot line/phone line to learn
about possible modifications before coming to the meeting.
    Agenda: On April 12, 2011, during the morning session, the
committee will discuss supplemental new drug application (sNDA) 022334/
S-009, trade name AFINITOR (everolimus) tablets, application submitted
by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. The proposed indication (use) for
this product is for the treatment of patients with advanced
neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of gastrointestinal, lung, or pancreatic
origin.
    During the afternoon session, the committee will discuss sNDA
021938/S-013, trade name SUTENT (sunitinib malate) capsules,
application submitted by C.P. Pharmaceuticals International C.V.,
represented by Pfizer, Inc. (authorized U.S. agent). The proposed
indication (use) for this product is for the treatment of unresectable
pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET).
    FDA intends to make background material available to the public no
later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post
the background material on its Web site prior to the meeting, the
background material will be made publicly available at the location of
the advisory committee meeting, and the background material will be
posted on FDA's Web site after the meeting. Background material is
available at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/Calendar/default.htm. Scroll down to the appropriate advisory committee link.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee.
Written submissions may be made to the contact person on or before
March 29, 2011. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled
between approximately 10:30 a.m. to 11 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.
Those individuals interested in making formal oral presentations should
notify the contact person and submit a brief statement of the general
nature of the evidence or arguments they wish to present, the names and
addresses of proposed participants, and an indication of the
approximate time requested to make their presentation on or before
March 21, 2011. Time allotted for each presentation may be limited. If
the number of registrants requesting to speak is greater than can be
reasonably accommodated during the scheduled open public hearing
session, FDA may conduct a lottery to determine the speakers for the
scheduled open public hearing session. The contact person will notify
interested persons regarding their request to speak by March 22, 2011.
    Persons attending FDA's advisory committee meetings are advised
that the Agency is not responsible for providing access to electrical
outlets.
    FDA welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory committee
meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons with
physical disabilities or special needs. If you require special
accommodations due to a disability, please contact Caleb Briggs at
least 7 days in advance of the meeting.
    FDA is committed to the orderly conduct of its advisory committee
meetings. Please visit our Web site at http://www.fda.gov/
AdvisoryCommittees/

AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm111462.htm for procedures on public conduct
during advisory committee meetings.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: February 24, 2011.
Thinh Nguyen,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011-4614 Filed 3-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P