[Federal Register: February 3, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 23)]
[Notices]
[Page 5821]
[DOCID:fr03fe06-35]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EC06-65-000]

Bridgeport Energy LLC; Casco Bay Energy Company, LLC; Duke Energy
Arlington Valley, LLC; Duke Energy Morro Bay LLC; Duke Energy Moss
Landing LLC; Duke Energy Oakland LLC; Duke Energy South Bay LLC; Duke
Energy Mohave, LLC; Griffith Energy LLC; Duke Energy Marketing America
LLC; Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, L.L.C.; LS Power Development,
LLC; LS Power Generation, LLC; LS Power Marketing, LLC; Notice of
Filing

January 26, 2006.
    Take notice that on January 19, 2006, Bridgeport Energy LLC
(Bridgeport), Casco Bay Energy Company, LLC, Duke Energy Arlington
Valley, LLC, Duke Energy Morro Bay LLC, Duke Energy Moss Landing LLC,
Duke Energy Oakland LLC, Duke Energy South Bay LLC, Duke Energy Mohave,
LLC (Duke Mohave), Griffith Energy LLC (Griffith and, collectively, the
Project Companies), Duke Energy Marketing America, LLC (DEMA), Duke
Energy Trading and Marketing, L.L.C. (DETM and together with the
Project Companies and DEMA, Duke Applicants), LS Power Development, LLC
(LSP Development), LS Power Generation, LLC (LSP Generation) and LS
Power Marketing, LLC (LSP Marketing and together with LSP Development
and LSP Generation, LSP Applicants and, collectively, Applicants),
submitted an application pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power
Act seeking authorization from the Commission pursuant to section 203
of the Federal Power Act for: (i) the transfer by certain subsidiaries
of Duke Energy Corporation, and the acquisition by LSP Generation, of
ownership interests in the Project Companies; and (ii) the transfer by
DETM and DEMA, and the acquisition by certain Project Companies and/or
LSP Marketing, of certain FERC-jurisdictional contracts pursuant to
which DETM and DEMA sell electric energy at wholesale. In addition,
Duke Applicants seek Commission authorization for an internal corporate
reorganization related to Duke Mohave, Griffith and Bridgeport, and LSP
Applicants seek Commission authorization for an internal corporate
reorganization related to LSP Marketing. Applicants also request
privileged treatment of commercially sensitive information included in
the application and waiver of certain of the Commission's filing
requirements.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant. On or before the comment date, it is
not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons
other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 9, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-1448 Filed 2-2-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 1, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75826-75827]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26258]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-1163]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Institutional Review Boards

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on the recordkeeping requirements
for institutional review boards (IRBs).

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by January 3, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to http://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on http://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2013-N-1163 for ``Agency Information Collection Activities:
Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Institutional Review Boards.''
Received comments will be placed in the docket and, except for those
submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of Dockets Management between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in its consideration of comments.
The second copy, which will have the claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available for public viewing and posted
on http://www.regulations.gov. Submit both copies to the Division of
Dockets Management. If you do not wish your name and contact
information to be made publicly available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not in the body of your comments and
you must identify this information as ``confidential.'' Any information
marked as ``confidential'' will not be disclosed except in accordance
with 21 CFR 10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA's posting of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access the information at: http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 11601 Landsdown
Street, 10A63, North Bethesda, MD 20852<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

Institutional Review Boards--21 CFR 56.115

OMB Control Number 0910-0130--Extension

    When reviewing clinical research studies regulated by FDA,
institutional review boards (IRBs) are required to create and maintain
records describing their operations, and make the records available for
FDA inspection when requested. These records include: Written
procedures describing the structure and membership of the IRB and the
methods that the IRB will use in performing its functions; the research
protocols, informed consent documents, progress reports, and reports of
injuries to subjects submitted by investigators to the IRB; minutes of
meetings showing attendance, votes, and decisions made by the IRB; the
number of votes on each decision for, against, and abstaining; the
basis for requiring changes in or disapproving research; records of
continuing review activities; copies of all correspondence between
investigators and the IRB; statement of significant new findings
provided to subjects of the research; a list of IRB members by name,
showing each member's earned degrees, representative capacity, and
experience in sufficient detail to describe each member's contributions
to the IRB's deliberations; and any employment relationship between
each member and the IRB's institution. This information is used by FDA
in conducting audit inspections of IRBs to determine whether IRBs and
clinical investigators are providing adequate protections to human
subjects participating in clinical research.
    The recordkeeping requirement burden is based on the following
information; the burden for the paragraphs under 21 CFR 56.115 has been
considered as one estimated burden. This burden estimate assumes that
there are approximately 2,520 IRBs, that each IRB meets on an average
of 14.6 times annually, and that approximately 100 hours of person-time
per meeting are required to meet the requirements of the regulation.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                                   Table 1--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of                        Average  burden
                        21 CFR Section                              Number of        records per      Total annual           per           Total hours
                                                                  recordkeepers     recordkeeper         records        recordkeeper
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
56.115........................................................            2,520              14.6            36,792               100         3,679,200
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    Dated: October 26, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-26258 Filed 10-31-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 5, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25909-25910]
[FR Doc No: 2018-11836]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 31195; Amdt. No. 3801]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, suspends, or removes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures (ODPs) for operations at certain
airports. These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption
of new or revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the
National Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective June 5, 2018. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of June 5, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matters incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:

For Examination

    1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Ops-M30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, West Bldg., Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    2. The FAA Air Traffic Organization Service Area in which the
affected airport is located;
    3. The office of Aeronautical Navigation Products, 6500 South
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

Availability

    All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available online free
of charge. Visit the National Flight Data Center at nfdc.faa.gov to
register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP
copies may be obtained from the FAA Air Traffic Organization Service
Area in which the affected airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Nichols, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS-420), Flight Technologies and Programs Divisions,
Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by establishing,
amending, suspending, or removes SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and/or ODPS.
The complete regulatory description of each SIAP and its associated
Takeoff Minimums or ODP for an identified airport is listed on FAA form
documents which are incorporated by reference in this amendment under 5
U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 CFR part 97.20. The applicable FAA
forms are FAA Forms 8260-3, 8260-4, 8260-5, 8260-15A, and 8260-15B when
required by an entry on 8260-15A.
    The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, their complex
nature, and the need for a special format make publication in the
Federal Register expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use
the regulatory text of the SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead
refer to their graphic depiction on charts printed by publishers of
aeronautical materials. Thus, the advantages of incorporation by
reference are realized and publication of the complete description of
each SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP listed on FAA form documents is
unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR sections and
specifies the types of SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs with their
applicable effective dates. This amendment also identifies the airport
and its location, the procedure, and the amendment number.

Availability and Summary of Material Incorporated by Reference

    The material incorporated by reference is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section.
    The material incorporated by reference describes SIAPS, Takeoff
Minimums and/or ODPS as identified in the amendatory language for part
97 of this final rule.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP as Amended in the
transmittal. Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and textual ODP amendments
may have been issued previously by the FAA in a Flight Data Center
(FDC) Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency action of immediate
flight safety relating directly to published aeronautical charts.
    The circumstances that created the need for some SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP amendments may require making them effective in less
than 30 days. For the remaining SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, an
effective date at least 30 days after publication is provided.
    Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these SIAPs and
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied to the
conditions existing or anticipated at the affected airports. Because of
the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and
public procedure under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are impracticable and contrary
to the public interest and, where applicable, under 5 U.S.C 553(d),
good cause exists for making some SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial

number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air traffic control, Airports, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 18, 2018.
John S. Duncan,
Executive Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations, part 97 (14 CFR part 97) is amended by
establishing, amending, suspending, or removing Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures and/or Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle Departure
Procedures effective at 0901 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114,
40120, 44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

Effective 21 June 2018

Fort Madison, IA, Fort Madison Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 1A
Big Rapids, MI, Roben-Hood, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt
6A
Detroit, MI, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County, ILS OR LOC RWY 22L,
ILS RWY 22L SA CAT I, Amdt 32A
Detroit, MI, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County, RNAV (RNP) W RWY
22R, Orig-A
Detroit, MI, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County, RNAV (RNP) X RWY 3R,
Orig-A
Detroit, MI, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County, RNAV (RNP) X RWY
21L, Orig-A
St Paul, MN, St Paul Downtown Holman Fld, ILS OR LOC RWY 32, Amdt 6A
Omaha, NE, Eppley Airfield, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 18, Amdt 4A
Saranac Lake, NY, Adirondack Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 8
Cleveland, OH, Cleveland-Hopkins Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 6L, Amdt 2A
Ottawa, OH, Putnam County, VOR RWY 27, Amdt 2C

Effective 19 July 2018

Manley Hot Springs, AK, Manley Hot Springs, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Orig
Manley Hot Springs, AK, Manley Hot Springs, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig
Manley Hot Springs, AK, Manley Hot Springs, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Orig
Fayetteville/Springdale/Rogers, AR, Northwest Arkansas Rgnl, ILS OR
LOC RWY 34, Amdt 4
Auburn, CA, Auburn Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 7, Orig-B
Long Beach, CA, Long Beach/Daugherty Field/, ILS OR LOC RWY 30, Amdt
34
Long Beach, CA, Long Beach/Daugherty Field/, RNAV (RNP) RWY 26R,
Amdt 1A
Long Beach, CA, Long Beach/Daugherty Field/, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 6A
Long Beach, CA, Long Beach/Daugherty Field/, VOR OR TACAN RWY 30,
Amdt 9
Oakland, CA, Metropolitan Oakland Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 12, Amdt 2
Palm Springs, CA, Jacqueline Cochran Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, Amdt 1
Palm Springs, CA, Jacqueline Cochran Rgnl, VOR RWY 30, Amdt 2
Palm Springs, CA, Jacqueline Cochran Rgnl, VOR-A, Amdt 1
Panama City, FL, Northwest Florida Beaches Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 16,
ILS RWY 16 SA CAT I, ILS RWY 16 SA CAT II, Amdt 3
Douglas, GA, Douglas Muni, ILS OR LOC RWY 4, Amdt 2C
Kahului, HI, Kahului, ILS OR LOC RWY 2, Amdt 25A
Springfield, IL, Abraham Lincoln Capital, VOR RWY 4, Orig-C
Sterling/Rockfalls, IL, Whiteside Co Arpt-Jos H Bittorf Fld, ILS OR
LOC RWY 25, Amdt 11
Sterling/Rockfalls, IL, Whiteside Co Arpt-Jos H Bittorf Fld, LOC BC
RWY 7, Amdt 6
Sterling/Rockfalls, IL, Whiteside Co Arpt-Jos H Bittorf Fld, NDB RWY
7, Amdt 6, CANCELED
Sterling/Rockfalls, IL, Whiteside Co Arpt-Jos H Bittorf Fld, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 7, Amdt 1
Sterling/Rockfalls, IL, Whiteside Co Arpt-Jos H Bittorf Fld, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 25, Amdt 1
Howell, MI, Livingston County Spencer J Hardy, RNAV (GPS) RWY 31,
Amdt 1B
Howell, MI, Livingston County Spencer J Hardy, VOR RWY 31, Amdt 11A,
CANCELED
Menominee, MI, Menominee Rgnl, ILS OR LOC RWY 3, Amdt 3
Menominee, MI, Menominee Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 3, Orig-A
Menominee, MI, Menominee Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 21, Orig-C
Menominee, MI, Menominee Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Amdt 1C
Menominee, MI, Menominee Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 3A
Menominee, MI, Menominee Rgnl, VOR-A, Amdt 3C
Cabool, MO, Cabool Memorial, RNAV (GPS) RWY 21, Orig-B
Cabool, MO, Cabool Memorial, VOR/DME RWY 21, Amdt 2A, CANCELED
Ithaca, NY, Ithaca Tompkins Rgnl, ILS OR LOC RWY 32, Amdt 7
Ithaca, NY, Ithaca Tompkins Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig-B
Ithaca, NY, Ithaca Tompkins Rgnl, VOR RWY 14, Amdt 14A, CANCELED
Ogdensburg, NY, Ogdensburg Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Amdt 1
Watertown, NY, Watertown Intl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 3
Tiffin, OH, Seneca County, NDB RWY 24, Amdt 7D
Tiffin, OH, Seneca County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 6, Orig-B
Tiffin, OH, Seneca County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, Amdt 1C
Tiffin, OH, Seneca County, VOR RWY 6, Amdt 9B
Anderson, SC, Anderson Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Amdt 2
Weslaco, TX, Mid Valley, RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Orig-A
Weslaco, TX, Mid Valley, VOR-A, Orig-B
Eastsound, WA, Orcas Island, RNAV (GPS) RWY 16, Amdt 2
Port Angeles, WA, William R Fairchild Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 8, Amdt
3A
Port Angeles, WA, William R Fairchild Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 8, Amdt
1A
Port Angeles, WA, William R Fairchild Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Amdt
1B
Port Angeles, WA, William R Fairchild Intl, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 3A
Port Angeles, WA, William R Fairchild Intl, WATTR SEVEN, Graphic DP
New Holstein, WI, New Holstein Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Orig-B

[FR Doc. 2018-11836 Filed 6-4-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 109 (Friday, June 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32798-32799]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13108]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-72292; File No. SR-EDGX-2014-13]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change To Amend Footnote 4 of the Exchange's
Fee Schedule To Permit Members To Designate Their Retail Orders To Be
Identified as Retail on the EDGX Book Feed

June 2, 2014.

I. Introduction

    On April 17, 2014, EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to permit EDGX Members \3\ to identify their
retail orders as ``retail'' on the EDGX Book Feed (the ``Proposal'').
The Proposal was published for comment in the Federal Register on April
30, 2014.\4\ The Commission received no comments on the Proposal. This
order approves the Proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ A Member is defined as ``any registered broker or dealer, or
any person associated with a registered broker or dealer, that has
been admitted to membership in the Exchange. A Member will have the
status of a ``member'' of the Exchange as that term is defined in
Section 3(a)(3) of the Act.'' See EDGX Rule 1.5(n).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72016 (April 24,
2014), 79 FR 24463 (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    Currently, EDGX Members may submit their Orders as Non-Attributable
Orders \5\ or Attributable Orders.\6\ If a Member choses to submit an
order as Attributable, the Exchange includes the Member's market
participant identifier (``MPID'') with that Member's published
quotations on the EDGX Book Feed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ A Non-Attributable Order is defined as ``[a]n order that is
designated for display (price and size) on an anonymous basis by the
Exchange. See EDGX Rule 11.5(c)(19).
    \6\ An Attributable Order is defined as, ``[a]n order that is
designated for display (price and size) including the Member's
market participant identifier (`MPID').'' See EDGX Rule 11.5(c)(18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the Proposal, the Exchange proposes to amend Footnote 4 of its
Fee Schedule to permit Members to designate that their Attributable
Retail Orders be identified as ``Retail'' \7\ on the EDGX Book Feed,
rather than by their MPID.\8\ Under the Proposal, a Member may elect
that their Retail Orders be identified as Retail on an order-by-order
basis or instruct the Exchange to identify all of the Member's Retail
Orders as Retail on a port-by-port basis where that port is also
designated as a Retail Order Port.\9\ The Exchange will

announce the effective date of the Proposal in a Trading Notice to be
published no later than 30 days following approval of the Proposal by
the Commission.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Footnote 4 of the Exchange's Fee Schedule defines a ``Retail
Order'' as (i) an agency order or riskless principal order that
meets the criteria of FINRA Rule 5320.03 that originates from a
natural person; (ii) is submitted to EDGX by a Member, provided that
no change is made to the terms of the order; and (iii) the order
does not originate from a trading algorithm or any other
computerized methodology. Footnote 4 of the Exchange's Fee Schedule
also provides that Members may designate orders as Retail Orders on
an order-by-order basis or a port level basis by designating
particular FIX ports as Retail Order Ports. Members must submit a
signed written attestation, in a form prescribed by the Exchange,
that they have implemented policies and procedures that are
reasonably designed to ensure that substantially all orders
designated by the Member as a ``Retail Order'' comply with the above
requirements. See Footnote 4 of the Exchange's Fee Schedule
available at http://www.directedge.com/Trading/EDGXFeeSchedule.aspx.
    \8\ If a Member instructs the Exchange to identify all its
orders on a Retail Order Port as Retail, the Member will not be able
to designate any Retail Order from that port instead as an
Attributable Order or as a Non-Attributable Order. See Notice, 79 FR
at 24464.
    \9\ A Member's decision on whether to identify their Retail
Order as Retail under the proposed rule change will not impact that
Member's eligibility to qualify for a rebate under the Retail Order
Tier included in Footnote 4 of the Exchange's Fee Schedule. See
Notice, 79 FR at 24464.
    \10\ See Notice, 79 FR at 24464.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the Proposal is
consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange
and, in particular, with Section 6(b) of the Act.\11\ In particular,
the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\12\ which requires, among other things,
that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest; and not be designed to
permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers or
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). In approving this proposed rule change,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that the Proposal is consistent with the
Act because it is reasonably designed to promote market transparency
and to encourage increased liquidity. Specifically, the Commission
notes that, according to the Exchange, members who may otherwise choose
to designate their order as Non-Attributable, and thereby not include
their MPID with their published quote on the EDGX Book Feed, would
choose to designate their orders as Retail. Identifying additional
orders as Retail Orders may encourage Members who wish to execute
against Retail Orders to send additional Orders to the Exchange,\13\
thereby potentially increasing the level of competition around retail
executions, resulting in better prices for retail investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ The Exchange notes that it conducted a study of its
execution data from January 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014, which
indicated that Members who represent Retail Orders and utilize
Attributable Orders to include their MPID with their published quote
on the EDGX Book Feed received an 18% higher execution rate than
Members who represent Retail Orders that elected not to include
their MPID on the EDGX Book Feed via the use of a Non-Attributable
Order. See Notice, 79 FR at 24464.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\14\ that the proposed rule change (SR-EDGX-2014-13), is hereby
approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-13108 Filed 6-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 210 (Tuesday, October 30, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65619-65621]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26600]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2012-0895]

Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Taunton River, MA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of deviation from drawbridge regulation; request for
comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a temporary deviation from the
operating schedule that governs the Veterans Memorial Bridge across the
Taunton River, mile 2.1, between Fall River and Somerset,
Massachusetts. This deviation will test a change to the drawbridge
operation schedule to determine whether a permanent change to the
schedule is needed. This deviation will allow us to test an operating
schedule to help determine the hours the bridge should be crewed. It is
expected that this test will help determine the best operating schedule
that will meet the present and future needs of navigation.

DATES: This deviation is effective from December 1, 2012, through May
29, 2013.

    Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard
on or before June 1, 2013. Requests for public meetings must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before March 1, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2012-0895 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these
four methods. See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments''
portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions
on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary deviation, call or email Mr. John McDonald, Project Officer,
First Coast Guard District bridge Program the Coast Guard; telephone
617-223-8364, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

1. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2012-0895), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (http://www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online
via http://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received by the
Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax,
hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as having
been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
insert ``USCG-2012-0895'' in the Search box, click ``Search,'' look for
this notice of deviation in the docket and click on the ``submit a
comment'' box on that same line. If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\
by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit
them by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period
and may change the rule based on your comments.

2. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
insert ``USCG-2012-0895'' in the Search box, and click ``Search.'' You
may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the
ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an agreement
with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket Management
Facility.

3. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

4. Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one on or before March 1, 2013, using one of the four
methods specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why one would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The Veterans Memorial Bridge at mile 2.1, across the Taunton River
between Somerset and Fall River, Massachusetts, has a vertical
clearance of 60 feet at mean high water and 66 feet at mean low water.
The horizontal clearance is 200 feet between the bridge protective
fenders. The drawbridge operation regulations listed at 33 CFR 117.5,
require the bridge to open on signal at all times.
    The waterway users are predominantly seasonal recreational vessels.
    The Veterans Memorial Bridge is a newly constructed double leaf
bascule highway bridge at mile 2.1, upstream from the existing
Brightman Street Route 6 highway bridge at mile 1.8, across the Taunton
River.
    The owner of the bridge, Massachusetts Department of
Transportation, submitted a request to the Coast Guard to change the
drawbridge operating regulations that presently require the draw to be
crewed 24 hours a day and open on signal at all times.
    The bridge owner proposes to crew the bridge less than 24 hours a
day and operate the bridge as follows: The draw shall open on signal
between 5 a.m. and 9 p.m. daily. From 9 p.m. through 5 a.m., the draw
shall open on signal after at least a 1-hour advance notice is given by
calling the number posted at the bridge. From 6 p.m. on December 24 to
midnight on December 25, and from 6 p.m. on December 31 to midnight on
January 1, the draw shall open on signal if at least a 2-hour advance
notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
    The Coast Guard has decided to test the designated operating hours
for the new bridge for 180 days to help determine if this schedule will
meet the reasonable needs of navigation that presently transit the new
bridge. Since this is a new bridge there is no historical record of
bridge openings to help us determine if this request is reasonable.
    It is anticipated that due to the high vertical clearance of 60
feet at mean high water and 66 feet at mean low, that the bridge should
not be required to open frequently except for large sail vessels.

    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the effective
period of this deviation. This deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: October 16, 2012.
Gary Kassof,
Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2012-26600 Filed 10-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 120 (Thursday, June 21, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37326-37328]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15115]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2012-0533]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Grand Hotel 125th Anniversary Fireworks Celebration,
Mackinaw Island, MI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone near
Mackinaw Island, Michigan. This safety zone is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of Lake Huron due to a fireworks display. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to protect the surrounding public
and vessels from the hazards associated with a fireworks display.

DATES: This rule is effective from 10:00 p.m. until 11:30 p.m. on July
13, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
[USCG-2012-0533]. To view documents in this preamble as being available
in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the docket number
in the ``SEARCH'' box, and click ``Search.'' You may visit the Docket
Management Facility, Department of Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email MST3 Kevin Moe, U.S. Coast Guard, Sector
Sault Sainte Marie, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-
9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

A. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable. The
final details for this event were not received by the Coast Guard with
sufficient time for a comment and period to run before the start of the
event. Thus, delaying this rule to wait for a notice and comment period
to run would be impracticable because it would inhibit the Coast
Guard's ability to protect the public from the hazards associated with
maritime fireworks displays.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons discussed in
the preceding paragraph, waiting for a 30 day notice period to run
would be impracticable.

B. Basis and Purpose

    On the evening of July 13, 2012, fireworks will be launched from a
point on Lake Huron to commemorate the Grand Hotel's 125th anniversary.
The Captain of the Port, Sector Sault Sainte Marie, has determined that
the Grand Hotel Celebration Fireworks Display will pose significant
risks to the public. The likely congested waterways in the vicinity of
a fireworks display could easily result in serious injuries or
fatalities.

C. Discussion of Rule

    To mitigate the risks associated with the Grand Hotel 125th
Anniversary Fireworks Celebration, the Captain of the Port, Sector
Sault Sainte Marie will enforce a temporary safety zone in the vicinity
of the launch site. This safety zone will encompass all waters of Lake
Huron approximately 1,000 yards west of Round Island Passage Light,
within the arc of a circle with a 500ft radius from the fireworks
launch site located on a barge positioned 45[deg]50'34.92'' N,
085[deg]37'38.16'' W [DATUM: NAD 83]. The safety zone will be effective
and enforced from 10:00 p.m. until 11:30 p.m. on July 13, 2012.
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Sector Sault
Sainte Marie, or his or her on-scene representative. The Captain of the
Port, Sector Sault Sainte Marie, or his or her on-scene representative
may be contacted via VHF channel 16.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order or under section
1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under these Orders. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS). We conclude that this rule is not a significant
regulatory action because we anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will
not raise any novel legal or policy issues. The safety zone will be
relatively small and will exist for only a minimal time. Under

certain conditions, moreover, vessels may still transit through the
safety zone when permitted by proper authority.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in a portion of Lake Huron between 10:00 p.m. and
11:30 p.m. on July 13, 2012.
    This safety zone will not have significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: this
rule will only be enforced for a short period of time. Vessels may
safely pass outside the safety zone during the event. In the event that
this temporary safety zone affects shipping, commercial vessels may
request permission from the Captain of the Port, Sector Sault Sainte
Marie, to transit through the safety zone. The Coast Guard will give
notice to the public via a Broadcast to Mariners that the regulation is
in effect.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding the rule. If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INTFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction because it involves the establishment of a safety zone.
A final environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under

ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0533 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T09-0533  Safety Zone; Grand Hotel 125th Anniversary
Fireworks Celebration, Mackinaw Island, Michigan.

    (a) Location. This safety zone will encompass all waters of Lake
Huron approximately 1000 yards west of Round Island Passage Light,
within the arc of a circle with a 500ft radius from the fireworks
launch site located on a barge positioned at 45[deg]50'34.92'' N,
085[deg]37'38.16'' W [DATUM: NAD 83].
    (b) Effective and enforcement period. This rule is effective and
will be enforced from 10:00 p.m. until 11:30 p.m. on July 13, 2012.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
section 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port, Sector Sault Sainte Marie, or his or her on-scene
representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port, Sector Sault Sainte Marie, or
his or her on-scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port,
Sector Sault Sainte Marie, is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been designated by the Captain of the Port,
Sector Sault Sainte Marie, to act on his or her behalf. The on-scene
representative of the Captain of the Port, Sector Sault Sainte Marie,
will be aboard either a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter the safety zone or operate
within the safety zone shall contact the Captain of the Port, Sector
Sault Sainte Marie, or his or her on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. The Captain of the Port, Sector Sault Sainte
Marie, or his or her on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF
Channel 16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in
the safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port, Sector Sault Sainte Marie, or his or her on-scene
representative.

    Dated: June 11, 2012.
S.B. Lowe,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Sault Sainte
Marie.
[FR Doc. 2012-15115 Filed 6-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P