			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on December 10, 2003

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2003-16555

________________________________________________________________________
___________________This serves as notice to the public of the action
described below, taken by the Department official indicated (no
additional confirming order will be issued in this matter).

Application of DELTA AIR LINES, INC. (DELTA) and AEROVIAS DE MEXICO,
S.A. DE C.V. (AEROMEXICO),  filed 11/19/03, for:

XX Exemption for Delta for two years under 49 U.S.C. 40109 to provide
the following service:

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail
between the terminal point Boston, Massachusetts, and the terminal point
Cancun, Mexico, and to combine this exemption authority with all of
Delta’s existing certificate and exemption authority, consistent with
international agreements.

XX Statement of Authorization for Aeromexico for indefinite duration
under Part 212 of the Department’s Regulations to:

Display Delta’s “DL” designator code on flights operated by
Aeromexico between Boston, Massachusetts, and Cancun, Mexico.

Applicant reps: Robert E. Cohn (Delta)<PHONE_NUMBER> DOT Analyst: Linda
Lundell<PHONE_NUMBER>

                         William C. Evans (Aeromexico)<PHONE_NUMBER>

D I S P O S I T I O N

XX  Granted (subject to conditions and remarks, see below)

The above action granting new exemption authority to Delta was effective
when

taken:  December 10, 2003,  through _December 10, 2005 .

The above action granting a statement of authorization to Aeromexico was
effective when

taken:  December 10, 2003, and will remain in effect indefinitely,
subject to the conditions below.

Action taken by:	Paul L. Gretch, Director

			Office of International Aviation

XX  The authority granted is consistent with the aviation agreement
between the United States and Mexico.

Except to the extent exempted or waived, this authority is subject to
the terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

	XX   Delta’s certificates of public convenience and necessity

	XX   Aeromexico’s foreign air carrier permit

	XX   Standard Exemption Conditions (attached)

Conditions:   The U.S.-Mexico exemption authority granted to Delta is
subject to the dormancy notice requirements set forth in condition 7 of
Appendix A of Order 88-10-2, and is limited to operations conducted on a
code-share basis only.

										2

The route integration authority granted to Delta is subject to the
condition that any service provided under this exemption shall be
consistent with all applicable agreements between the United States and
the foreign countries involved.  Furthermore, (a) nothing in the award
of the route integration authority granted should be construed as
conferring upon Delta rights (including fifth-freedom intermediate
and/or beyond rights) to serve markets where U.S. carrier entry is
limited unless Delta notifies the Department of its intent to serve such
a market and unless and until the Department has completed any necessary
carrier selection procedures to determine which carrier(s) should be
authorized to exercise such rights); (b) should there be a request by
any carrier to use the limited-entry route rights that are included in
Delta’s authority by virtue of the route integration exemption granted
here, but that are not then being used by Delta, the holding of such
authority by route integration will not be considered as providing any
preference for Delta in a competitive carrier selection proceeding to
determine which carrier(s) should be entitled to use the authority at
issue.

The Statement of Authorization granted Aeromexico is subject to the
following conditions:

 The statement of authorization will remain in effect only as long as
Delta and Aeromexico continue to hold the underlying authority to
operate the code-share services at issue, and the code-share agreement
providing for the code-share operations remains in effect.

  Delta and/or Aeromexico must promptly notify the Department (Office of
Internatinal Aviation) if the code-share agreement is no longer
effective or if the carriers decide to cease operating all or a portion
of the approved code-share services.  (Such notice should be filed in
Docket OST-2003-16555).

  The code-sharing operations conducted under this authority must comply
with 14 CFR 257 and with any amendment to the Department’s regulations
concerning code-share arrangements that may be adopted.  Notwithstanding
any provisions in the contract between the carriers, our approval here
is expressly conditioned upon the requirements that the subject foreign
air transportation be sold in the name of the carrier holding out such
service in computer reservation systems and elsewhere; that the carrier
selling such transportation (i.e., the carrier shown on the ticket)
accept responsibility for the entirety of the code-share journey for all
obligations established in its contract of carriage with the passenger;
and that the passenger liability of the operating carrier be unaffected;
and the operating carrier shall not permit the code of its U.S.
code-sharing partner to be carried on any flight that enters, departs,
or transits the airspace of any area for whose airspace the Federal
Aviation Administration has issued a flight prohibition; and

  The authority granted here is specifically conditioned so that neither
Delta nor Aeromexico shall give any force or effect to any contractual
provisions between themselves that are contrary to these conditions.

________________________________________________________________________
_________

On the basis of data officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the
Department’s regulations, we found the applicant qualified to provide
the services authorized.

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) grant of the application was consistent with the public
interest; and (3) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the 										3

Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.  To the extent not granted,
we denied all requests in the

referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority
granted in this Notice at any time

without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

							APPENDIX

U.S. Carrier Standard Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the U.S. carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Hold at all times effective operating authority from the government
of each country served;

(2)  Comply with applicable requirements concerning oversales contained
in 14 CFR 250 (for scheduled operations, if authorized);

(3)  Comply with the requirements for reporting data contained in 14 CFR
241;

(4)  Comply with requirements for minimum insurance coverage, and for
certifying that coverage to the Department, contained in 14 CFR 205;

(5)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 203, concerning
waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(6)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security.  To assure compliance with all applicable U.S.
Government requirements concerning security, the holder shall, before
commencing any new service (including charter flights) to or from a
foreign airport, contact its Principal Security Inspector (PSI) to
advise the PSI of its plans and to find out whether the Transportation
Security Administration has determined that security is adequate to
allow such airport(s) to be served; and

(7)  Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department of Transportation, with all applicable orders and regulations
of other U.S. agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the
United States.

The authority granted shall be effective only during the period when the
holder is in compliance with the conditions imposed above.

											8/2003

   Aeromexico already holds exemption authority to serve the
Boston-Cancun market (see Notice of Action Taken dated October 16, 2003,
in Docket OST-2003-16269).

   We expect this notification to be received within 10 days of such
non-effectiveness or of such decision.


[Federal Register: November 9, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 217)]
[Notices]
[Page 65809]
[DOCID:fr09no06-96]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM05-30-000]

Rules Concerning Certification of Electronic Reliability
Organization; and Procedures for the Establishment, Approval and
Enforcement of Electric Reliability Standards; Notice of Availability
of Filing

November 2, 2006.
    Take notice that, on October 23, 2006, the Commission received the
2006 Long-Term Reliability Assessment prepared by the North American
Electric Reliability Council (NERC).
    Section 39.11 of the Commission's regulations provides that the
Electric Reliability Organization (ERO) shall conduct assessments of,
among other things, the adequacy of the Bulk-Power System in North
America and report its findings to the Commission, the Secretary of
Energy, each Regional Entity, and each Regional Advisory Body annually
or more frequently if so ordered by the Commission. According to NERC,
the 2006 Long-Term Reliability Assessment is the first assessment filed
by NERC in its capacity as the ERO.
    This assessment is filed under Docket No. RM05-30-000 and is
accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the ``eLibrary'' link

and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room.
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-18928 Filed 11-8-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: August 11, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 154)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 48552-48553]
[DOCID:fr11au10-4]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 91

[Docket No. FAA-2007-29305; Amdt. No. 91-314]
RIN 2120-AI92

Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Out
Performance Requirements To Support Air Traffic Control (ATC) Service;
OMB Approval of Information Collection

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; OMB approval of information collection.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document notifies the public of the Office of Management
and Budget's (OMB's) approval of the information collection requirement
contained in the FAA's final rule, ``Automatic Dependent Surveillance-
Broadcast (ADS-B) Out Performance Requirements To Support Air Traffic
Control (ATC) Service,'' which was published on May 28, 2010.

DATES: The effective date of the final rule published on May 28, 2010,
is August 11, 2010. However, because it contained new information
collection requirements, compliance with the information collection
provisions contained in Sec.  91.225 was not required until they were
approved by OMB. This document announces that OMB approval was received
on July 29, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions concerning
this document, contact Vincent Capezzuto, Surveillance and Broadcast
Services, AJE-6, Air Traffic Organization, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For legal questions concerning this document, contact Lorelei
Peter, Office of the Chief Counsel, AGC-220, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 28, 2010, the final rule, ``Automatic
Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Out Performance Requirements
To Support Air Traffic Control (ATC) Service,'' was published in the
Federal Register (75 FR 30160). In that rule, the FAA amended its
regulations by adding equipage requirements and performance standards
for Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Out avionics on
aircraft operating in Classes A, B, and C airspace, as well as certain
other specified classes of airspace within the U.S. National Airspace
System (NAS).
    In the DATES section of the final rule, the FAA noted that affected
parties were not required to comply with the new information collection
requirements in Sec.  91.225 until OMB approved the FAA's request to
collect the information. The regulation requires persons operating in
the specified airspace to equip with Automatic Dependent Surveillance-
Broadcast (ADS-B) Out avionics that continuously transmits aircraft
information via automation for use in providing air traffic
surveillance services. That information collection

requirement had not been approved by OMB at the time of publication.
    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, the FAA submitted a
copy of the information collection requirements to OMB for its review.
OMB approved the collection on July 29, 2010, and assigned the
information collection OMB Control Number 2120-0728, which expires on
July 31, 2013.
    This document is being published to inform affected parties of the
approval, and to announce that as of July 29, 2010, affected parties
are required to comply with the information collection requirements in
Sec.  91.225.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 6, 2010.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2010-19809 Filed 8-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30163-30164]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13849]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Institution of Section 206 Proceedings and Refund
Effective Date

Ameren Illinois Company..................  Docket Nos. EL18-155-000.
Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois..  Docket Nos. EL18-156-000.
American Transmission Company, LLC.......  Docket Nos. EL18-157-000.
GridLiance West Transco LLC..............  Docket Nos. EL18-158-000.
International Transmission Company.......  Docket Nos. EL18-159-000.
ITC Midwest, LLC.........................  Docket Nos. EL18-160-000.
Northern States Power Company, a           Docket Nos. EL18-161-000.
 Minnesota corporation.
Northern States Power Company, a           Docket Nos. EL18-162-000.
 Wisconsin corporation.
Public Service Company of Colorado.......  Docket Nos. EL18-163-000.
Southern California Edison Company.......  Docket Nos. EL18-164-000.
TransCanyon DCR, LLC.....................  Docket Nos. EL18-165-000.
Southwestern Public Service Company......  Docket Nos. EL18-166-000.
Virginia Electric and Power Company......  Docket Nos. EL18-167-000 (not consolidated).

    On June 21, 2018, the Commission issued an order in Docket Nos.
EL18-155-000, EL18-156-000, EL18-157-000, EL18-158-000, EL18-159-000,
EL18-160-000, EL18-161-000, EL18-162-000, EL18-163-000, EL18-164-000,
EL18-165-000, EL18-166-000, and EL18-167-000, pursuant to section 206
of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting
investigations into whether the transmission formula rates of Ameren
Illinois Company, Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois, American
Transmission Company, LLC, GridLiance West Transco LLC, International
Transmission Company, ITC Midwest, LLC, Northern States Power Company,
a Minnesota corporation, Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin
corporation, Public Service Company of Colorado, Southern California
Edison Company, TransCanyon DCR, LLC, Southwestern Public Service
Company, and Virginia Electric and Power Company (collectively,
Respondents) may be unjust, unreasonable, or unduly discriminatory or
preferential. Ameren Illinois Company, et al., 163 FERC 61,200 (2018).
    The refund effective date in Docket Nos. EL18-155-000, EL18-156-
000, EL18-157-000, EL18-158-000, EL18-159-000, EL18-160-000, EL18-161-
000, EL18-162-000, EL18-163-000,

EL18-164-000, EL18-165-000, EL18-166-000, and EL18-167-000, established
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication
of this notice in the Federal Register.
    Any interested person desiring to be heard in the proceeding
associated with a particular Respondent must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate, in the docket
number identified in the caption of this notice, with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC
20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214 (2017), within 21 days of the
date of issuance of the order.

    Dated: June 21, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-13849 Filed 6-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 196)]
[Notices]
[Page 58962-58964]
[DOCID:fr08oc08-59]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0046; FRL-8383-7]

Notice of Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions Filed for
Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various Commodities

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the Agency's receipt of several initial
filing of pesticide petitions proposing the establishment or
modification of regulations for residues of pesticide chemicals in or
on various commodities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 7, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number and the pesticide petition number (PP) of interest as shown
in the body of this document, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours of operation (8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to the docket ID number and the
pesticide petition number of interest as shown in the body of this
document. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available at http://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either in the electronic
docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of
operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A contact person is listed at the end
of each pesticide petition summary and may be contacted by telephone or
e-mail. The mailing address for each contact person listed is:
Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW,
Washington, DC 20460-0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed at the end of the pesticide petition
summary of interest.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

     1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
     2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
    3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have a typical or disproportionately high and adverse
human health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the
pesticides discussed in this document, compared to the general
population.

II. What Action is the Agency Taking?

     EPA is announcing its receipt of several pesticide petitions filed
under section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
21 U.S.C. 346a, proposing the establishment or modification of
regulations in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of pesticide chemicals in
or on various food commodities. EPA has determined that the pesticide
petitions described in this document contain the data or information
prescribed in FFDCA section 408(d)(2); however, EPA has not fully
evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether
the data support granting of the pesticide petitions. Additional data
may be needed before EPA can make a final determination on these
pesticide petitions.
     Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a summary of each of the petitions
that are the subject of this notice, prepared by the petitioner, is
included in a docket EPA has created for each rulemaking. The docket
for each of the petitions is available on-line at http://
www.regulations.gov.
    As specified in FFDCA section 408(d)(3), (21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3)),
EPA is publishing notice of the petition so that the public has an
opportunity to comment on this request for the establishment or
modification of regulations for residues of pesticides in or on food
commodities. Further information on the petition may be obtained
through the petition summary referenced in this unit.

Amendment to Existing Tolerances

     1. PP 8E7314. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0258). Interregional Research
Project Number 4 (IR-4), 500 College Road East, Suite 201 W, Princeton,
NJ 08540, proposes to amend the tolerance in 40 CFR 180.493 for
residues of the fungicide dimethomorph, (E,Z) 4-[3-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-
(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl]morpholine, by increasing the
tolerance in or on potato, wet peel from 0.15 parts per million (ppm)
to 0.20 ppm, and re-establishing the tolerance in or on potato at 0.05
ppm. A reliable method for the determination of dimethomorph residues
in lima beans, ginseng, grape, raisin and turnip greens exists; this
method is the FDA Multi-Residue Method, Protocol D, as published in the
Pesticide Analytical Manual I. Contact: Sidney Jackson,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    2. PP 8E7400. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0672). Monsanto Company, 1300 I
Street, NW., Suite 450 East, Washington, DC 20005, proposes to amend
the tolerance in 40 CFR 180.471 for residues of furilazole, 3-
dichloroacetyl-5-(2-furanyl)-2,2-dimethyloxazolidine (CAS No. 121776-
33-8), when used as an inert ingredient (safener) in pesticide
formulations, by increasing the tolerance in or on field corn, forage
to 0.05 ppm. Monsanto has developed an analytical method using gas
liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry with selected ion monitoring
that has a verified limit of quantitation of 0.01 ppm for parent
furilazole in corn grain, forage and stover. This method is analogous
to that validated by the Agency with the exception of the use of a
mass-specific detector rather than an electron capture detector.
Contact: Karen Samek,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
New Exemption from an Inert Tolerance

     PP 8E7372. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0665). Dow AgroSciences, LLC, 9330
Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268, proposes to establish an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR 180.910 and 40
CFR 180.930 for residues of sodium monoalkyl and dialkyl
(C6-C16) phenoxybenzenedisulfonates and related
acids when used as, but not limited to, use as a surfactant as a
pesticide inert ingredient in pesticide formulations with limits up to
20 percent of the pesticide formulation. This tolerance expression
includes the following chemicals in the table below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
            CAS Number                          Chemical Name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
147732-59-0                         Benzene, 1,1'-oxybis-, sec-hexyl
                                     derivatives, sulfonated
------------------------------------------------------------------------
147732-60-3                         Benzene, 1,1'-oxybis-, sec-hexyl
                                     derivatives, sulfonated, sodium
                                     salts
------------------------------------------------------------------------
169662-22-0                         Benzenesulfonic acid, phenoxy-,
                                     monosulfo derivative, disodium
                                     salt, adduct with 1-hexene (1:2)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
70191-75-2                          Benzenesulfonic acid, decyl
                                     (sulfophenoxy)-
------------------------------------------------------------------------
36455-71-3                          Benzenesulfonic acid, decyl
                                     (sulfophenoxy)-, sodium salt (1:2)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
39354-74-0                          Dowfax 3B1 surfactant
------------------------------------------------------------------------
70146-13-3                          Benzenesulfonic acid, oxybis[decyl]-
                                     , sodium salt (1:2)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
119345-03-8                         Benzene, 1,1'-oxybis-,
                                     tetrapropylene derivatives,
                                     sulfonated
------------------------------------------------------------------------
149119-20-0                         Benzene, 1,1'-oxybis-, sec-dodecyl
                                     derivatives, sulfonated, sodium
                                     salts
------------------------------------------------------------------------

149119-19-7                         Benzene, 1,1'-oxybis-, sec-dodecyl
                                     derivatives, sulfonated
------------------------------------------------------------------------
119345-04-9                         Benzene, 1,1'-oxybis-,
                                     tetrapropylene derivatives,
                                     sulfonated, sodium salts
------------------------------------------------------------------------
28519-02-0                          Benzenesulfonic acid, dodecyl
                                     (sulfophenoxy)-, sodium salt (1:2)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
25167-32-2                          Benzenesulfonic acid,
                                     oxybis[dodecyl]-, sodium salt (1:2)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
30260-73-2                          Benzenesulfonic acid, phenoxy-,
                                     monosulfo didodecyl derivative
------------------------------------------------------------------------
65143-89-7                          Benzenesulfonic acid, hexadecyl
                                     (sulfophenoxy)-, sodium salt (1:2)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
70191-76-3                          Benzenesulfonic acid,
                                     oxybis[hexadecyl]-, sodium salt
                                     (1:2)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because this petition is a request for an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance, no analytical method is required. Contact:
Karen Samek,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives,
Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    Dated: September 26, 2008.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E8-23858 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


INCIDENT REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH Quaternary Ammonium Compounds ( Quats)

February 15, 2006 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs Antimicrobials Division TABLE OF CONTENTS 0.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.0 INCIDENT REPORT DATA ASSOCIATED WITH HEALTH EFFECTS ............................................... 3 1.1 OPP'S INCIDENT DATA SYSTEM ( IDS)................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 CALIFORNIA DATA  1982 THROUGH 2003............................................................................................................. 4 1.3 NATIONAL PESTICIDE TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK ( NPTN)...................................................................... 4 1.4 INCIDENT REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH ACUTE TOXIC EFFECTS OF QUATS PUBLISHED IN SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE. ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION.................................................................................................................... 5 3.0 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 0.0 INTRODUCTION Quaternary ammonium compounds ( Quats) are widely used industrial chemicals. The purpose of this chapter is to review the evidence of health effects in humans resulting from exposure to QAC. As stated in the PR Notice 88 1 ( February 26, 1988), the Agency has clustered Quats into four categories:

Group I. Alkyl or hydroxyalkyl ( straight chain) substituted quats; Group II Non halogenated benzyl substituted quats; Group III. Di and tri chlorobenzyl substituted quats; and Group IV. Quats with unusual substituents However for the available incident information, it is difficult to differentiate the specific members of the Quats the involved in each incident. Therefore, in preparing this reports, all the quats are going to discussed together.

1.0 INCIDENT REPORT DATA ASSOCIATED WITH HEALTH EFFECTS The following databases have been consulted for the poisoning incident data on the active ingredient quats Incident Data System ( IDS)  The Incident Data System of The Office of Pesticide Programs ( OPP) of the Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) contains reports of incidents from various sources, including registrants, other federal and state health and environmental agencies and individual consumers, submitted to OPP since 1992. Reports submitted to the Incident Data System represent anecdotal reports or allegations only, unless otherwise stated. Typically no conclusions can be drawn implicating the pesticide as a cause of any of the reported health effects. Nevertheless, sometimes with enough cases and/ or enough documentation risk mitigation measures may be suggested. And California Department of Pesticide Regulation  California has collected uniform data on suspected pesticide poisonings since 1982. Physicians are required, by statute, to report to their local health officer all occurrences of illness suspected of being related to exposure to pesticides. The majority of the incidents involve workers. Information on exposure ( worker activity), type of illness ( systemic, eye, skin, eye/ skin and respiratory), likelihood of a causal relationship, and number of days off work and in the hospital are provided.

National Pesticide Telecommunications Network ( NPTN)  NPTN is a toll free information service supported by OPP. A ranking of the top 200 active ingredients for which telephone calls were received during calendar years 1984 1991, inclusive, has been prepared. The total number of calls was tabulated for the categories human incidents, animal incidents, calls for information, and others.

Published Incident Reports  Some incident reports associated with quats related human health hazard are published in the scientific literature.

1.1 OPP's Incident Data System ( IDS)

There are 1,584 incidences that have been reported in the OPP incident data system associated with quats exposure.

Dermal, ocular and inhalation are the primary routes of exposure. Most of the incidences are related to irritation type reaction. The most common symptoms reported for cases of dermal exposure were skin irritation/ burning, rash, itching, skin discoloration/ redness and blistering. Some allergic type reactions including hives and allergic contact dermatitis have also been reported.. The most common symptoms reported for cases of ocular exposure were eye irritation/ burning, eye pain and swelling of eyes.

The most common symptoms reported for cases of inhalation exposure were respiratory irritation/ burning, irritation to mouth/ throat/ nose, coughing/ choking, shortness of breath, dizziness, flu like symptoms, and headache.

1.2 California Data  1982 through 2003 There are 1,105 incidences that have been reported in the California Pesticide Surveillance Program Database ( 1982 2003) as definitely , probably, or possibly related to quats ( Mehler, 2005). As summarized in Table 1, symptoms associated with eyes are the primary reported illness ( over 50%) in all the associated incidences.

Nausea, headache, and sore throat are the primary systemic effects that have been reported. The primary dermal effects that have been reported are rash, burning sensation, numbness, itching, As summarized in Table 2, although there are some people who were unable to work after exposure for a certain period of time, no one was hospitalized.

1.3 National Pesticide Telecommunications Network ( NPTN)

There are no incident reported in the NPTN database related to quats exposure.

1.4 Incident Reports Associated with Acute Toxic Effects of Quats Published in Scientific Literature.

There are several incidents have been published outlining the problems associated with the use of quats. Most of the reported incidents are associated with irritation type reaction ( Preller et al, 1996). Some incidents are associated with allergic type reaction through dermal exposure ( Dibo and Brasch, 2001; Shmunes and Levy, 1972) or eye exposure ( Orlandini, et al. 1990).

2.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION There are many incident reported associated with exposure to end use products containing quats. Dermal, ocular and inhalation are the primary routes of exposure. Most of the incidences are related to irritation. Allergic type reaction is also been reported in some incidents.

Although risk associated with eye exposure is not assessed in the risk assessment process, symptoms associated with eye are most commonly reported associated with quats exposure. The most common symptoms reported for cases of ocular exposure were eye irritation/ burning, eye pain, conjunctivitis, swelling eye and swelling of eyelid The most common symptoms reported for cases of inhalation exposure were respiratory irritation/ burning, irritation to mouth/ throat/ nose, coughing/ choking, chest pain, disorientation, dizziness, shortness of breath.

The most common symptoms reported for cases of dermal exposure were skin irritation/ burning, rash, itching, and blistering. Allergic type reactions including hives and allergic contact dermatitis, have also been reported..

Although oral exposure is considered a minor route of exposure for quats use, irritation to mouth/ throat/ nose, vomiting/ nausea/ abdominal pain, dizziness, and headache have been reported in the cases of ingestion. Table 1. Cases Due to Quaternary Ammonium Compounds Exposure in California Reported by Type of Illness and Year, 1982 2003 Illness Type Year Systemic a Eye Skin b Respiratory Combination c Total 1982 ND ND ND ND ND 2 1983 ND ND ND ND ND 4 1984 ND ND ND ND ND 3 1985 ND ND ND ND ND 2 1986 ND ND ND ND ND 2 1987 ND ND ND ND ND 23 1988 ND ND ND ND ND 53 1989 ND ND ND ND ND 67 1990 ND ND ND ND ND 86 1991 1 53 22 4  81 1992 4 40 14 3 3 71 1993 4 54 16 1 3 79 1994 3 62 21 1 2 88 1995 4 61 18 5  89 1996 2 43 20 1 1 67 1997 2 53 14 6 3 75 1998 3 43 16 6 3 66 1999 4 32 11 5 4 47 2000 2 25 17 3 1 46 2001 1 30 8 2 3 36 2002 4 22 10 6 4 39 2003 14 49 18 7 13 72 Total ( 1991 2003 ) 48 567 205 50 40 856 Total ( 1882 2003 )       1105 a Category include cases where nausea, sore throat, dizziness, headache and other systemic effects occurred. b Category includes burning sensation, numbness, itching, and discolored ( white/ brownish) skin. c Category includes combined effects to eye, skin, respiratory and/ or systemic effects. d ND = No available information. Before1991, there is no clear medical description of all the related symptoms for all the related incidents. 7 Table 2: Number of Persons Disabled ( taking time off work) or Hospitalized for Indicated Number of Days after Quaternary Ammonium Compounds Exposure in California, 1982 2003.

Number of Persons Disabled Number of Persons Hospitalized One day 89 1 Two days 54 1 3 5 days 44 1 6 10 days 17

11   15 days 6

More than 15 days 5

Indefinite a 6

Unknownb 24 1 Note: ( a) An entry of indefinite indicates the event occurred, but the time period is not known. ( b). An entry of unknown indicates no information was provided. 8 3.0 REFERENCES Dibo, M. and Brasch, J. 2001. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from N, N bis93 aminoprpyl) dodecylamine and dimethyldidecylammonium chloride in two hospital staff. Contact Dermatitis. 45( 1): 40.

Mehler, L. 2005. Personal Communication. California Department of Pesticide Regulation Oriandini, A.; Viotti, G. Martinoli, C; and Magno, L. 1990. Allergic Contact Conjunctivities from synthetic detergenets in nurse. Contact Dermatitis. 23: 376 377.

Preller, L.; Doekers, G.; Heederik, D.; Vermulen, R.; Vogelzang, P. F. J, and Boleij, J. S. M. 1996. Disinfinfectant use as a risk factor for atopic sensitization and symptoms consistent with asthma: an epidemiological study. European Respiratory Journal: 9 ( 7) 1407 1413.

Shmunes, E. and Levy, E. J. 1972. Quaternary ammonium compound contact dermatitis from deodorant. Arch Dermatol. 105( 1) 91 93.


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 149 (Monday, August 3, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46563-46566]
[FR Doc No: 2020-16628]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0678; Product Identifier 2020-NM-098-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Aviation Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2019-24-11, which applies to certain Dassault Aviation Model FALCON
900EX airplanes. AD 2019-24-11 requires revising the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or
more restrictive airworthiness limitations. Since the FAA issued AD
2019-24-11, the FAA determined that new or more restrictive
airworthiness limitations are necessary. This proposed AD would
continue to require those maintenance or inspection program revisions,
and would also require revising the existing maintenance or inspection
program, as applicable, to incorporate additional new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations, as specified in a European Union
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which will be incorporated by
reference. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by September
17, 2020.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For EASA material identified in this proposed AD that will be
incorporated by reference (IBR), contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer
3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR
material on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
    For Dassault service information identified in the proposed AD,
contact Dassault Falcon Jet Corporation, Teterboro Airport, P.O. Box
2000, South Hackensack, NJ 07606; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet
https://www.dassaultfalcon.com.
    You may view this IBR material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products
Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2020-0678.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0678; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for

Docket Operations is listed above. Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. The most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments, commenters should send only one
copy of written comments, or if comments are filed electronically,
commenters should submit only one time. Send your comments to an
address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-
2020-0678; Product Identifier 2020-NM-098-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, as well
as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this
proposal, the FAA will consider all comments received by the closing
date for comments. The FAA will consider comments filed after the
comment period has closed if it is possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. The FAA may change this NPRM because of those
comments.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Any
commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated
as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.

Discussion

    The FAA issued AD 2019-24-11, Amendment 39-19814 (84 FR 69997,
December 20, 2019) (``AD 2019-24-11''), which applies to certain
Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 900EX airplanes. AD 2019-24-11 requires
revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable,
to incorporate new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations. The
FAA issued AD 2019-24-11 to address reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.
    AD 2019-24-11 specifies that accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (g) or (i) of that AD terminates the requirements of
paragraph (g)(1) of AD 2010-26-05, Amendment 39-16544 (75 FR 79952,
December 21, 2010) for Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 900EX airplanes,
serial numbers 1 through 96 inclusive, and serial numbers 98 through
119 inclusive.

Actions Since AD 2019-24-11 Was Issued

    Since the FAA issued AD 2019-24-11, the FAA determined that new or
more restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary.
    The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2020-0116, dated May 20, 2020
(``EASA AD 2020-0116'') (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 900EX airplanes.
EASA AD 2020-0116 superseded EASA AD 2019-0133 (which corresponds to
FAA AD 2019-24-11).
    This proposed AD was prompted by a determination that new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. The FAA is
proposing this AD to address reduced structural integrity of the
airplane. See the MCAI for additional background information.

Related IBR Material Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2020-0116 describes new or more restrictive maintenance
tasks and airworthiness limitations.
    This proposed AD would also require Chapter 5-40, Airworthiness
Limitations, Revision 16, dated September 2018, of the Dassault FALCON
900EX Maintenance Manual, which the Director of the Federal Register
approved for incorporation by reference as of January 24, 2020 (84 FR
69997, December 20, 2019).
    This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority,
the FAA has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
and service information referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD
because the FAA evaluated all pertinent information and determined an
unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would retain the requirements of AD 2019-24-11.
This proposed AD would also require revising the existing maintenance
or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations, which are specified in EASA AD
2020-0116 described previously, as incorporated by reference. Any
differences with EASA AD 2020-0116 are identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this AD.
    This proposed AD would require revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new actions (e.g., inspections).
Compliance with these actions is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For
airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in
the areas addressed by this proposed AD, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the actions described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request
approval for an alternative method of compliance according to paragraph
(m)(1) of this proposed AD.

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA initially worked with Airbus and EASA to develop a
process to use certain EASA ADs as the primary source of information
for compliance with requirements for corresponding

FAA ADs. The FAA has since coordinated with other manufacturers and
civil aviation authorities (CAAs) to use this process. As a result,
EASA AD 2020-0116 will be incorporated by reference in the FAA final
rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require compliance with EASA
AD 2020-0116 in its entirety, through that incorporation, except for
any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this
proposed AD. Using common terms that are the same as the heading of a
particular section in the EASA AD does not mean that operators need
comply only with that section. For example, where the AD requirement
refers to ``all required actions and compliance times,'' compliance
with this AD requirement is not limited to the section titled
``Required Action(s) and Compliance Time(s)'' in the EASA AD.
    Service information specified in EASA AD 2020-0116 that is required
for compliance with EASA AD 2020-0116 will be available on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2020-0678 after the FAA final rule is published.

Airworthiness Limitation ADs Using the New Process

    The FAA's process of incorporating by reference MCAI ADs as the
primary source of information for compliance with corresponding FAA ADs
has been limited to certain MCAI ADs (primarily those with service
bulletins as the primary source of information for accomplishing the
actions required by the FAA AD). However, the FAA is now expanding the
process to include MCAI ADs that require a change to airworthiness
limitation documents, such as airworthiness limitation sections.
    For these ADs that incorporate by reference an MCAI AD that changes
airworthiness limitations, the FAA requirements are unchanged.
Operators must revise the existing maintenance or inspection program,
as applicable, to incorporate the information specified in the new
airworthiness limitation document. The airworthiness limitations must
be followed according to 14 CFR 91.403(c) and 91.409(e).

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 72 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:
    The FAA estimates the total cost per operator for the retained
actions from AD 2019-24-11 to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-
hour).
    The FAA has determined that revising the maintenance or inspection
program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator, although the
FAA recognizes that this number may vary from operator to operator. In
the past, the FAA has estimated that this action takes 1 work-hour per
airplane. Since operators incorporate maintenance or inspection program
changes for their affected fleet(s), the FAA has determined that a per-
operator estimate is more accurate than a per-airplane estimate.
Therefore, the FAA estimates the total cost per operator for the new
proposed actions to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-hour).

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2019-24-11, Amendment 39-19814 (84 FR 69997, December 20, 2019), and
adding the following new AD:

Dassault Aviation: Docket No. FAA-2020-0678; Product Identifier
2020-NM-098-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments by September 17, 2020.

(b) Affected ADs

    (1) This AD replaces AD 2019-24-11, Amendment 39-19814 (84 FR
69997, December 20, 2019) (``AD 2019-24-11'').
    (2) This AD affects AD 2010-26-05, Amendment 39-16544 (75 FR
79952, December 21, 2010) (``AD 2010-26-05'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 900EX
airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in European
Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2020-0116, dated May 20, 2020
(``EASA AD 2020-0116'').

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05, Time Limits/
Maintenance Checks.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a determination that new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision, With No
Changes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD
2019-24-11, with no changes. Within 90 days after January 24, 2020
(the effective date AD 2019-24-11), revise the existing maintenance
or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate the information
specified in Chapter 5-40,

Airworthiness Limitations, Revision 16, dated September 2018, of the
Dassault FALCON 900EX Maintenance Manual. The initial compliance
times for accomplishing the actions are at the times specified in
Chapter 5-40, Airworthiness Limitations, Revision 16, dated
September 2018, or 90 days after the January 24, 2020, whichever
occurs later, except as provided by paragraphs (g)(1) through (4) of
this AD. Accomplishing the maintenance or inspection program
revision required by paragraph (i) of this AD terminates the
requirements of this paragraph.
    (1) The term ``LDG'' in the ``First Inspection'' column of any
table in the service information means total airplane landings.
    (2) The term ``FH'' in the ``First Inspection'' column of any
table in the service information means total flight hours.
    (3) The term ``FC'' in the ``First Inspection'' column of any
table in the service information means total flight cycles.
    (4) The term ``M'' in the ``First Inspection'' column of any
table in the service information means months since the date of
issuance of the original airworthiness certificate or the date of
issuance of the original export certificate of airworthiness.

(h) Retained Restrictions on Alternative Actions and Intervals, With a
New Exception

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (j) of AD
2019-24-11, with a new exception. Except as required by paragraph
(i) of this AD, after the maintenance or inspection program has been
revised as required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may be used unless the
actions or intervals are approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (m)(1) of this AD.

(i) New Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision

    Except as specified in paragraph (j) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2020-0116. Accomplishing the maintenance or
inspection program revision required by this paragraph terminates
the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD.

(j) Exceptions to EASA AD 2020-0116

    (1) The requirements specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of EASA
AD 2020-0116 do not apply to this AD.
    (2) Paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2020-0116 specifies revising ``the
approved AMP'' within 12 months after its effective date, but this
AD requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection program,
as applicable, to incorporate the ``limitations, tasks and
associated thresholds and intervals'' specified in paragraph (3) of
EASA AD 2020-0116 within 90 days after the effective date of this
AD.
    (3) The initial compliance time for doing the tasks specified in
paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2020-0116 is at the applicable ``associated
thresholds'' specified in paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2020-0116, or
within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later.
    (4) The provisions specified in paragraphs (4) and (5) of EASA
AD 2020-0116 do not apply to this AD.
    (5) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2020-0116 does not apply
to this AD.

(k) New Provisions for Alternative Actions and Intervals

    After the maintenance or inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (i) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections) and intervals are allowed unless they are approved as
specified in the provisions of the ``Ref. Publications'' section of
EASA AD 2020-0116.

(l) Terminating Actions for Certain Actions in AD 2010-26-05

    Accomplishing the actions required by paragraph (g) or (i) of
this AD terminates the requirements of paragraph (g)(1) of AD 2010-
26-05, for Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 900EX airplanes, serial
numbers 1 through 96 inclusive, and serial numbers 98 through 119
inclusive.

(m) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (n)(2) of this AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Dassault
Aviation's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(n) Related Information

    (1) For information about EASA AD 2020-0116, contact the EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
8999 000; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet www.easa.europa.eu. You
may find this EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. This material may be
found in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2020-0678.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Tom Rodriguez,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone
and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Issued on July 27, 2020.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-16628 Filed 7-31-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 22072]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08596]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER16-1325-000]

Mesquite Solar 2, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Mesquite Solar 2, LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is April 26, 2016.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 6, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-08596 Filed 4-13-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 8452]
[FR Doc No: 2017-01617]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-79839; File No. SR-BatsBZX-2016-80]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on Proposed Rule
Changes to BZX Rule 14.11, Other Securities, and BZX Rule 14.12,
Failure To Meet Listing Standards

January 18, 2017.
    On November 18, 2016, Bats BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to, among other
things: (1) Amend the listing rules relating to exchange-traded
products in BZX Rule 14.11 to add additional continued listing
standards; and (2) incorporate certain changes to BZX Rule 14.12
(Failure to Meet Listing Standards). The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal Register on December 7, 2016.\3\
The Commission has received one comment letter on the proposed rule
change.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79450 (December 1,
2016), 81 FR 88284.
    \4\ See letter from David W. Blass, General Counsel, Investment
Company Institute, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission, dated
January 12, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \5\ provides that, within 45 days of
the publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change
is January 21, 2017. The Commission is extending this 45-day time
period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer
period within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that
it has sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change.
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\6\ designates March 7, 2017, as the date by which the Commission
shall either approve or disapprove or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change (File Number
SR-BatsBZX-2016-80).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-01617 Filed 1-24-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45473-45475]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20325]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2016-0362; FRL-9968-10-Region 4]

Air Plan Approval; North Carolina Miscellaneous Rules

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving several
changes to the North Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted
by the State of North Carolina, through the North Carolina Department
of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), on December 14, 2004, and March 1,
2016. The March 1, 2016, submission adds a new rule to the
``Exclusionary Rules'' of the North Carolina SIP, and the portion of
the December 14, 2004, submission EPA is approving adds two new rules
under a new section called ``Permit Exemptions.'' This action is being
taken pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).

DATES: This rule will be effective October 30, 2017.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2016-0362. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential
Business Information or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On December 14, 2004, and March 1, 2016, the State of North
Carolina, through NCDEQ, submitted revisions to the North Carolina SIP.
The March 1, 2016, submission which adds a new rule--15A NCAC 02Q .0809
Concrete Batch Plants--and a portion of the December 14, 2004,
submission which adds two new rules--15A NCAC 02Q .0901, Purpose and
Scope and .0902 Portable Crushers. In a proposed rulemaking published
on July 10, 2017 (82 FR 31739), EPA proposed to approve these SIP
revisions. The details of North Carolina's SIP revision and the
rationale for EPA's action are explained in the proposed rulemaking.
Comments on the proposed rulemaking were due on or before August 9,
2017. EPA did not receive any comments on the proposed action.

II. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of North
Carolina Rules 15A NCAC 02Q .0809 entitled ``Concrete Batch Plants''
effective April 1, 2004, a new exclusionary rule for concrete batch
that excludes from Title V permitting requirements such

facilities that operate below a specified annual production rate; 15A
NCAC 02Q .0901 entitled ``Purpose and Scope'' effective January 1,
2005, a new exclusionary rule which provides for exclusions from
construction and operating permits for certain types of sources and
activities; and 15A NCAC 02Q .0902 entitled ``Portable Crushers''
effective January 1, 2005, an exclusionary rule which provides for
exclusions from construction and operating permits for portable crusher
operations.
    Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion
in the State implementation plan, have been incorporated by reference
by EPA into that plan, are fully federally-enforceable under sections
110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking
of EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference by the
Director of the Federal Register in the next update to the SIP
compilation.\1\ EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and/or at the
EPA Region 4 Office (please contact the person identified in the ``For
Further Information Contact'' section of this preamble for more
information).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Final Action

    EPA is approving North Carolina's March 1, 2016, submission and a
portion of the December 14, 2004, submission. The changes pertain to
the addition of two new rules under a new section ``Permit Exemptions''
and a new rule to the ``Exclusionary Rules'' of the North Carolina SIP.
These rule adoptions do not contravene federal permitting requirements
or existing EPA policy, nor will they impact the NAAQS or interfere
with any other applicable requirement of the Act. See 42 U.S.C.
7410(l).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, these
actions merely approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, these actions:
     Are not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     do not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     are certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     do not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     are not an economically significant regulatory action
based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     are not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     are not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 28, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: September 13, 2017.
Onis ``Trey'' Glenn, III,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart II--North Carolina

0
2. In Sec.  52.1770, table 1 in paragraph (c) is amended under the
heading ``Subchapter 2Q Air Quality Permits'' by:
0
a. Adding ``Sect .0809'' in numerical order.
0
b. Adding the heading ``Section .0900 Permit Exemptions'' and the
entries ``Sect .0901'' and ``Sect .0902'' at the end of the table.
    The additions read as follows:

Sec.  52.1770   Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                Table 1--EPA-Approved North Carolina Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         State
       State citation            Title/subject      effective date    EPA approval date         Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Subchapter 2Q Air Quality Permits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Section .0800 Exclusionary Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sect .0809.................  Concrete Batch Plants        4/1/2004  9/27/2017, [insert     .....................
                                                                     Federal Register
                                                                     citation].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         Section .0900 Permit Exemptions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sect .0901.................  Purpose and Scope....        1/1/2005  9/27/2017, [insert     .....................
                                                                     Federal Register
                                                                     citation].
Sect .0902.................  Portable Crushers....        1/1/2005  9/27/2017, [insert     .....................
                                                                     Federal Register
                                                                     citation].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-20325 Filed 9-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


 [Federal Register: October 23, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 204)] [ Notices]                [Page 54877-54878] [DOCID:fr23oc09-101]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

  Eleventh Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 216: Aeronautical

Systems Security

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 216: Aeronautical Systems

Security meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a

meeting of RTCA Special Committee 216: Aeronautical Systems Security.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 18-19, 2009 from 9 a.m. to 5

p.m. and November 20, 2009 from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. Foreign nationals

planning to attend should register one week in advance and contact RTCA

for SC-216 registration details.

    Note: Foreign nationals will need to provide

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>with the following information at

least one week prior to the meeting:

     First Name.

     Last Name.

     Company Name.

     Address of their Company.

     Phone Number.

     Honeywell EID (if applicable)--this can be left blank.

     Citizenship.

     Green Card, Asylee/Refugee number (only if they have one).

     Passport Number.

     Passport Expiration Date.

     VISA Number (only if they have one).

     VISA Type (only if they have one).

     VISA Expiration Date (only if they have one).

     Age (enter only if under the age of 18).

     Did this guest work directly for Honeywell in the past as

an employee? Answer ``Yes'' or ``No.''

     Does this guest work in a sales capacity for their

company? Answer ``Yes'' or ``No.''

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Honeywell Aerospace Deer Valley

Facility, 21111 N. 19th Avenue, Phoenix, AZ. Check-in at Visitor's

Entrance, you will be directed from there.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW.,

Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (202)

833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal

Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-

463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a Special

Committee 216/Aeronautical Systems Security meeting. The agenda will

include:

     Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks.

     Agenda Overview and Approval of the Summary of the 10th

meeting held September 1, 2009, (RTCA Paper No. 213-09/SC216-021).

     Report on the PMC/ICC action on TOR.

     EUROCAE WG-72 Report.

     Subgroup and Action Item Reports.

     Subgroup Meetings/Break-outs.

     Subgroup Reports on Break-outs.

     Establish Dates, Location, and Agenda for Next Meeting(s).

     Any Other Business.

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space

availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public

may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present

statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in

the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may

present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 14, 2009.

Meredith Gibbs,

Staff Specialist, RTCA Advisory Committee.

[FR Doc. E9-25497 Filed 10-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: January 26, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 15)]
[Notices]
[Page 4485]
[DOCID:fr26ja09-127]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Regulation S-K, OMB Control No. 3235-0071, SEC File No. 270-2.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a
request for extension of the previously approved collection of
information discussed below.
    Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.101-229.103, 229.201-229.202, 229.301-
229.308T, 229.401-229.407, 229.501-229.512, 229.601, 229.701-229.703,
229.801-229.802, 229.901-229.915) specifies the non-financial
disclosure requirements applicable to registration statements under the
Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) and registration
statements under Section 12, annual and other reports under Section 13
and 15(d), going-private transaction statements under Section 13,
tender offer statements under Section 13 and 14, annual reports to
security holders and proxy and information statements under Section 14
and any other documents required to be filed under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78l, 78m, 78n, 78o(d)). Regulation S-K
is assigned one burden hour for administrative convenience.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    Written comments regarding the above information should be directed
to the following persons: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503 or send an e-mail to Shagufta_
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Charles Boucher, Director/CIO, Securities
and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way,
Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: January 14, 2009.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-1460 Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P