[Federal Register: March 12, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 47)]
[Notices]
[Page 11022]
[DOCID:fr12mr07-98]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. CP06-452-000]

Trunkline Gas Company, LLC; Notice of Availability of the
Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Field Zone Expansion Project

March 5, 2007.
    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) on the
natural gas pipeline facilities proposed to be constructed by Trunkline
Gas Company, LLC (Trunkline) in the above-referenced docket.
    The EA was prepared to satisfy the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act. The staff concludes that approval of the
proposed project, with appropriate mitigating measures, would not
constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality
of the human environment.
    The EA assesses the potential environmental effects of:

Texas and Louisiana

     Installation of a 45-mile-long 36-inch-diameter NTX Line-
200 Loop natural gas pipeline and associated facilities from the Gate
Valve 43 in Jasper County, Texas to the Longville Meter Station in
Beauregard Parish, Louisiana, running through Jasper and Newton
Counties, Texas and Beauregard Parish, Louisiana.

Texas

     Installation of three meter stations in Hardin County,
Jasper Counties, and Liberty County, Texas; and
     Abandonment a 6,350-horsepower (Hp) gas-turbine
centrifugal compressor unit replaced with a new 10,350-Hp electric
motor-driven compressor unit and for a total of 10,350-Hp of
compression at the Kountze Compressor Station in Hardin County, Texas.

Louisiana

     Installation of a 13.5-mile-long 36-inch-diameter Henry
Hub Lateral natural gas pipeline and associated facilities along
existing pipeline right-of-way (ROW) in Vermilion Parish, Louisiana;
     Installation of two bi-directional meter stations in
Vermilion Parish, Louisiana;
     Relocation of two 3,000-Hp compressor units from the
Centerville Compressor Station to the Kaplan Compressor Station in
Vermilion Parish, Louisiana; and
     Installation of a 10,350-Hp compressor unit at the
Longview Compressor Station in Beauregard Parish, Louisiana.

Illinois

     Removal of a 3,000-Hp compressor unit at the Joppa
Compressor Station in Massac County, Illinois; modify it and uprate to
5,100-Hp, and then re-install it at the Kaplan Compressor Station in
Louisiana.
    The purpose of the proposed project is to expand the capacity of
Trunkline's natural gas pipeline facilities to allow for the flow of
natural gas from expanding gas production in Texas to delivery points
in Louisiana.
    The EA has been placed in the public files of the FERC. A limited
number of copies of the EA are available for distribution and public
inspection at: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Reference
and Files Maintenance Branch, 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A,
Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Copies of the EA have been mailed to Federal, state and local
agencies, public interest groups, interested individuals, newspapers,
and parties to this proceeding.
    Any person wishing to comment on the EA may do so. To ensure
consideration prior to a Commission decision on the proposal, it is
important that we receive your comments before the date specified
below. Please carefully follow these instructions to ensure that your
comments are received in time and properly recorded:
     Send two copies of your comments to: Secretary, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Room 1A, Washington,
DC 20426;
     Label one copy of the comments for the attention of the
Gas Branch 2, PJ11.2.
     Reference Docket No. CP06-452-000; and
     Mail your comments so that they would be received in
Washington, DC on or before April 4, 2007.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing of any
comments or interventions or protests to this proceeding. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
at http://www.ferc.gov under the ``e-Filing'' link and the link to the

User's Guide. Before you can file comments you would need to create a
free account which can be created by clicking on ``Sign-up.''
    Comments would be considered by the Commission but would not serve
to make the commentor a party to the proceeding. Any person seeking to
become a party to the proceeding must file a motion to intervene
pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedures (18 CFR 385.214).\1\ Only intervenors have the right to seek
rehearing of the Commission's decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Interventions may also be filed electronically via the
Internet in lieu of paper. See the previous discussion on filing
comments electronically.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Affected landowners and parties with environmental concerns may be
granted intervenor status upon showing good cause by stating that they
have a clear and direct interest in this proceeding which would not be
adequately represented by any other parties. You do not need intervenor
status to have your comments considered.
    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at 1-866-208-FERC or on the
FERC Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link.

Click on the eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter the
docket number excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number
field. Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For
assistance with eLibrary, the eLibrary helpline can be reached at 1-
866-208-3676, TTY<PHONE_NUMBER> or at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The
eLibrary link on the FERC Internet Web site also provides access to the
texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders,
notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission now offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you too keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries and direct links to
the documents. Go to http://www.ferc.gov, click on ``eSubscription''

and then click on ``Sign-up.''

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-4335 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: March 19, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 54)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 14687]
[DOCID:fr19mr08-16]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMERCE DEPARTMENT

Industry and Security Bureau

15 CFR Part 738

Commerce Control List Overview and the Country Chart

CFR Correction

    In Title 15 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 300 to 799,
revised as of January 1, 2008, in part 738, in Supplement No. 1, on
page 244, an ``X'' is added in the entry for Tonga under the heading
CC3.

[FR Doc. 08-55506 Filed 3-18-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 69929]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27862]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Fifty-Ninth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 186, Automatic
Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 186, Automatic
Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the
fifty ninth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 186, Automatic
Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B)

DATES: The meeting will be held December 9-13, from 9:00 a.m.--5:00
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the RTCA Headquarters, 1150 18th
Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-
0662/(202) 833-9339, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 186. The agenda will
include the following:

December 9

 All Day, WG-4/EUROCAE SubGroup 3--Application Technical.
Requirements, MacIntosh-NBAA Room & Colson Board Room

December 10

 All Day, WG-4/EUROCAE SubGroup 3--Application Technical.
Requirements, MacIntosh-NBAA Room & Colson Board Room.

December 11

 All Day, WG-4/EUROCAE SubGroup 3--Application Technical.
Requirements, MacIntosh-NBAA Room & Colson Board Room

December 12

 All Day, WG-4/EUROCAE SubGroup 3--Application Technical.
Requirements, MacIntosh-NBAA Room & Colson Board Room.

December 13

 Chairman's Introductory Remarks Working Group Reports
 Review of Meeting Agenda
 Review/Approval of the Fifty-Eighth Meeting Summary, RTCA
Paper No. 078-13/SC186-325.
 FAA Surveillance and Broadcast Services (SBS) Program--Status.
 EUROCAE WG-51 Report
 Review/Approval--New Document--Safety, Performance and
Interoperability Requirements Document for Traffic Situation Awareness
with Alerts (TSAA), RTCA Paper No. 242-13/SC186-326.
 Review/Approval--Revised DO-317A--Minimum Operational
Performance Standards (MOPS) for Aircraft Surveillance Applications
(ASA) System, RTCA Paper No. 246-12/SC186-327.
 ADS-B IM Coordination with SC-214/WG-78 for Data Link Rqts-
Discussion-Status.
 Working Group Reports
     WG-4--Application Technical Requirements
    [ssquf] Flight Deck-based Interval Management (FIM) MOPS Status &
Schedule
    [ssquf] Cockpit Assisited Pilot Prpocedures (CAPP)
 Terms of Reference--proposed changes and discussion
 Date, Place and Time of Next Meeting
 New Business.
 Other Business.
 Review Action Items/Work Programs.
 Adjourn Plenary

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 14, 2013.
Paige Williams,
Management Analyst, Business Operations Group, NextGen, Management
Services, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-27862 Filed 11-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: May 9, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 89)]
[Notices]
[Page 26348]
[DOCID:fr09my07-48]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-409-000]

Black Marlin Pipeline Company; Notice of Cash-Out Report

May 2, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 27, 2007, Black Marlin Pipeline Company
(Black Marlin) tendered for filing its annual cash-out report for the
calendar year ended December 31, 2006.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated
below. Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or
protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve
motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time, May 9, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-8841 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 214 (Monday, November 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67114-67115]
[FR Doc No: 2022-24123]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket No. FRA-2010-0031]

Long Island Rail Road's Request To Amend Its Positive Train
Control Safety Plan and Positive Train Control System

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides the public with notice that, on October
21, 2022, Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) submitted a request for
amendment (RFA) to its FRA-approved Positive Train Control Safety Plan
(PTCSP). As this RFA may involve a request for FRA's approval of
proposed material modifications to an FRA-certified positive train
control (PTC) system, FRA is publishing this notice and inviting public
comment on the railroad's RFA to its PTCSP.

DATES: FRA will consider comments received by November 28, 2022. FRA
may consider comments received after that date to the extent
practicable and without delaying implementation of valuable or
necessary modifications to a PTC system.

ADDRESSES: Comments: Comments may be submitted by going to https://www.regulations.gov and following the online instructions for
submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and the
applicable docket number. The relevant PTC docket number for this host
railroad is Docket No. FRA-2010-0031. For convenience, all active PTC
dockets are hyperlinked on FRA's website at https://railroads.dot.gov/train-control/ptc/ptc-annual-and-quarterly-reports. All comments
received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov;
this includes any personal information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gabe Neal, Staff Director, Signal,
Train Control, and Crossings Division, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In general, title 49 United States Code
(U.S.C.) section 20157(h) requires FRA to certify that a host
railroad's PTC system complies with title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 236, subpart I, before the technology may be
operated in revenue service. Before making certain changes to an FRA-
certified PTC system or the associated FRA-approved PTCSP, a host
railroad must submit, and obtain FRA's approval of, an RFA to its PTCSP
under 49 CFR 236.1021.
    Under 49 CFR 236.1021(e), FRA's regulations provide that FRA will
publish a notice in the Federal Register and invite public comment in
accordance with 49 CFR part 211, if an RFA includes a request for
approval of a material modification of a signal and train control
system. Accordingly, this notice informs the public that, on October
21, 2022, LIRR submitted an RFA to its PTCSP for its Advanced Civil
Speed Enforcement System II (ACSES II), and that RFA is available in
Docket No. FRA-2010-0031. LIRR's RFA describes LIRR's proposed Onboard
PTC Software Version 7_02_0024, including its Tunnel Protection Package
for its East Side Access passenger service.
    Interested parties are invited to comment on LIRR's RFA to its
PTCSP by submitting written comments or data. During FRA's review of
this railroad's RFA, FRA will consider any comments or data submitted
within the timeline specified in this notice and to the extent
practicable, without delaying implementation of valuable or necessary
modifications to a PTC system. See 49 CFR 236.1021; see also 49 CFR
236.1011(e). Under 49 CFR 236.1021, FRA maintains the authority to
approve, approve with conditions, or deny a railroad's RFA to its PTCSP
at FRA's sole discretion.

Privacy Act Notice

    In accordance with 49 CFR 211.3, FRA solicits comments from the
public to better inform its decisions. DOT posts these comments,
without edit, including any personal information the commenter
provides, to https://www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of
records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. See https://www.regulations.gov/privacy-notice for the privacy notice of regulations.gov. To facilitate
comment tracking, we encourage commenters to provide their name, or the
name of their organization; however, submission of names is completely
optional. If you wish to provide comments containing proprietary or
confidential information, please contact FRA for alternate submission
instructions.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Carolyn R. Hayward-Williams,
Director, Office of Railroad Systems and Technology.
[FR Doc. 2022-24123 Filed 11-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 5622]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02529]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-777-000]

Iridium Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Iridium Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is February 22, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
[email protected] or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 2, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-02529 Filed 2-7-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 21 (Monday, February 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5608-5609]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01861]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-74143; File No. SR-CBOE-2015-006]

Self-Regulatory Organizations: Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fees Schedule

January 27, 2015.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on January 14, 2015, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(the ``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's
Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule.\3\ The Exchange
currently assesses a Customer Priority Surcharge for VIX and VXST
options that are executed electronically.\4\ More specifically, the
Customer Priority Surcharge for VIX and VXST is assessed on all
Customer (C) VIX and VXST contracts executed electronically that are
Maker and not Market Turner. Additionally, the Surcharge is only
assessed on such contracts that have a premium of $0.11 or greater. The
Exchange has learned of a technical and billing issue that prevents the
effective assessment of the Surcharge to complex orders. As such, the
Exchange proposes to waive the Surcharge for VIX and VXST complex
orders pending resolution \5\ of the abovementioned billing issue.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee change on
January 2, 2015 (SR-CBOE-2015-003). On January 14, 2015, the
Exchange withdrew that filing and submitted this filing.
    \4\ The current Surcharge is $0.10 per contract for VIX and
$0.05 per contract for VXST for contracts that have a premium of
$0.11 or greater (see CBOE Fees Schedule, Customer Priority
Surcharge).
    \5\ Upon resolution of the technical and billing issue, the
Exchange will submit a rule filing to reinstate the Surcharge for
complex orders in VIX and VXST.
    \6\ The Exchange notes that the technical and billing issue does
not affect SPXW and as such, the proposed waiver does not apply to
SPXW (i.e., the Priority Surcharge will continue to be assessed for
complex orders in SPXW).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') [sic] and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\7\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,\8\ which provides that Exchange rules may provide
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among its Trading Permit Holders and other persons using its
facilities. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \9\ requirements that the
rules of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade,
to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to,
and facilitation transactions in securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent
with the Section 6(b)(5)\10\ requirement that the rules of an exchange
not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes that waiving the Surcharge for
VIX and VXST complex orders is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it is waiving a fee that is currently subject to
a billing issue and the waiver applies to all Trading Permit Holders.
The Exchange believes it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
to temporarily waive the Surcharge for complex orders and not simple
orders because the electronic complex order book has a different order
flow demographic and market model than that for simple orders. Further,
the Exchange notes that other exchanges currently offer different
pricing for complex orders than for simple orders.\11\ Additionally,
waiving the Surcharge for complex orders pending resolution of the
technical and billing issue eliminates potential misassessment of a fee
and eliminates confusion, thereby removing impediments to and
perfecting the mechanism for a free and open market system, and in
general, protecting investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See e.g., International Securities Exchange, LLC (``ISE'')
Schedule of Fees, Section IV and also C2 Fees Schedule, Section 1C
and 1D.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not believe
that the proposed changes impose any burden on intramarket competition
as the waiver of the Surcharge applies to all Trading Permit Holders.
As such, the proposed changes are equitable among all market
participants and are not unfairly discriminatory. Additionally, the
proposed change merely addresses a technical and billing issue on CBOE.
To the extent that the proposed change makes CBOE a more attractive
marketplace for market participants at other exchanges, such
participants are welcome to become CBOE market participants.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \12\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \13\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2015-006 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2015-006. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2015-006 and
should be submitted on or before February 23, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-01861 Filed 1-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 108 (Wednesday, June 5, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26019-26021]
[FR Doc No: 2019-11620]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R10-OAR-2018-0834: FRL-9994-32-Region 10]

Air Plan Approval; AK; Updates to Curtailment Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing
approval of revisions to the Alaska State Implementation Plan (SIP)
that were submitted by the Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation (ADEC). These revisions update and strengthen ADEC's
regulation of residential wood smoke emissions, especially the
curtailment program as it applies to the Fairbanks fine particulate
matter nonattainment area. No comments were received on this action.

DATES: This action is effective on July 5, 2019.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2018-0834. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information the disclosure
of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact
section for additional availability information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Justin Spenillo at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Attn: Justin Spenillo, Air and Radiation
Division, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, it is intended to refer to the EPA. This
supplementary information section is arranged as follows:

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. EPA's Final Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    On November 28, 2018, ADEC submitted revisions to specific air
quality regulations for approval into the federally-enforceable Alaska
SIP. The submission includes changes to Alaska Administrative Code
Title 18, Environmental Conservation, Chapter 50, Air Quality Control
(18 AAC 50), adopted December 8, 2017, and state-effective January 11,
2018. This action addresses a portion of the submitted revisions,
specifically those that update and strengthen wood smoke curtailment
regulations that apply in the Fairbanks North Star Borough fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) nonattainment area.\1\ EPA
approved a prior version of Alaska's wood smoke curtailment regulations
for the Fairbanks North Star Borough fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) nonattainment area on September 8, 2017 (82 FR
42457).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See 40 CFR 81.302.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 22, 2019, we proposed to approve the submitted updates to
solid fuel-fired heating device visible emission standards at 18 AAC
50.075(e), and revisions to the Fairbanks Emergency Episode Plan and
associated appendix, state-effective January 11, 2018 (84 10750).\2\ We
intend to take action on the remainder of the submission in a separate,
future action.\3\ Please see our proposed rulemaking for further
explanation and the basis for our approval (84 FR 10750, March 22,
2019). The comment period for our proposed rulemaking closed on April
22, 2019. No comments were received on this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The Fairbanks Emergency Episode Plan is in Volume II:
Section III.D.5.11 and is codified as a matter of State law at 18
AAC 50.030(a). The associated appendix to the plan is in Volume III:
Appendix III.D.5.12 and includes the Fairbanks North Star Borough
Ordinance No. 2017-18 and No. 2017-44, codified as a matter of State
law at 18 AAC 50.030(a).
    \3\ The remainder of the submission addresses revisions to 18
AAC 50.030(b), 18 AAC 50.075(f), 18 AAC 50.077, 18 AAC 50.079, and
18 AAC 50.990.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. EPA's Final Action

    The EPA is approving and incorporating by reference the following
revised rule into the Alaska SIP at 40 CFR 52.70(c):
     18 AAC 50.075(e) Solid Fuel-fired Heating Device Visible
Emission Standards, state effective January 12, 2018.
    The EPA is approving, but not incorporating by reference, the
following revised sections of the Alaska State Air Quality Control
Plan:
     Volume II, Section III.D.5.11 Fairbanks Emergency Episode
Plan, state effective January 12, 2018; and
     Pages 68 through 84 of Volume III, Appendix III.D.5.12:
Appendix to Volume II. Analysis of Problems, Control Actions; Section
III. Area-wide Pollutant Control Program; D. Particulate Matter; 5.
Fairbanks North Star Borough PM2.5 Control Plan, state
effective January 12, 2018.
    As described previously, the EPA is approving these revisions as
SIP strengthening. These revisions support the state's ability to
reduce and manage emissions in the Fairbanks PM2.5
nonattainment area. This action does not alter our prior approval of
the plan as meeting Moderate area requirements and we are not making
any findings with respect to the Serious plan requirements triggered
upon reclassification. As a result of today's final action, violations
of any air quality episode called pursuant to 18 AAC 50.075(e) at the
levels and conditions specified in Table 1 and Table 2, below, are
federally enforceable.

     Table 1--ADEC's Table 5.11-1 Air Quality Episode Thresholds and
                               Exceptions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Episode feature          Stage 1 air alert     Stage 2 air alert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PM2.5 Threshold micrograms    25..................  35.
 per cubic meter, (ug/m3.
Exceptions During a Power     Yes.................  Yes.
 Outage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Table 2--ADEC's Table 5.11-2 PM2.5 Air Quality Episode Appliance-
                   Specific or Waiver-Specific Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Appliance type or waiver
            type                Stage 1 air alert     Stage 2 air alert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No other adequate source of   Operation Prohibited  Operation Prohibited
 heat (NOASH) designation,     except Borough        except Borough
 meets other requirements in   Listed Solid Fuel     Listed Solid Fuel
 21.28.060.                    Burning Appliances    Burning Appliances
                               (SFBA).               (SFBA).
Approved Stage 1 Waiver,      Operation Prohibited  Operation
 meets other requirements in   except Borough        Prohibited.
 21.28.060.                    Listed Solid Fuel
                               Burning Appliances
                               (SFBA).
Wood Stoves.................  Operation Prohibited  Operation
                                                     Prohibited.
Coal Stoves.................  Operation Prohibited  Operation
                                                     Prohibited.
Wood-fired hydronic heaters.  Operation Prohibited  Operation
                                                     Prohibited.
Wood-fired Furnaces.........  Operation Prohibited  Operation
                                                     Prohibited.
Coal-fired Hydronic Heaters.  Operation Prohibited  Operation
                                                     Prohibited.
Coal-fired Furnaces.........  Operation Prohibited  Operation
                                                     Prohibited.
Fireplace Inserts...........  Operation Prohibited  Operation
                                                     Prohibited.
Pellet Fuel Burning           Operation Prohibited  Operation
 Appliances.                                         Prohibited.
Masonry Heaters.............  Operation Prohibited  Operation
                                                     Prohibited.
Cook Stoves.................  Operation Prohibited  Operation
                                                     Prohibited.
Fireplaces..................  Operation Prohibited  Operation
                                                     Prohibited.
Waste Oil Burning Appliances  Operation Prohibited  Operation
                                                     Prohibited.
Non-Permitted Outdoor         Operation Prohibited  Operation
 Incinerators, Burn Barrels.                         Prohibited.
Campfires, Bonfires,          Voluntary             Operation
 Ceremonial Fires, Fire pits.  Curtailment.          Prohibited.
Cook Stoves.................  Operation Prohibited  Operation
                                                     Prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with the requirements of 1
CFR 51.5, we are finalizing the incorporation by reference as described
in Section III of this action, and the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set
forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
materials generally available through https://www.regulations.gov and
at the EPA Region 10 Office (please contact the person identified in
the For Further Information Contact section of this preamble for more
information). Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA
for inclusion in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by the
EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110
and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of
the EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference in the next
update to the SIP compilation.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act
and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because it does not involve technical standards; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated
that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the
rule does not have tribal implications and it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Therefore, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 5, 2019. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: May 15, 2019.
Chris Hladick,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart C--Alaska

0
2. In Sec.  52.70:
0
a. The table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising entry 18 AAC
50.075; and
0
b. The table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding, at the end of the
table, an undesignated heading entitled ``Recently-Approved Plans'' and
entries ``II.III.D.5.11'' and ``III.III.D.5.12''.
    The revision and additions read as follows:

Sec.  52.70  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                  EPA-Approved Alaska Regulations and Statutes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             State
          State citation              Title/subject        effective     EPA approval date       Explanations
                                                             date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Alaska Administrative Code Title 18 Environmental Conservation, Chapter 50--Air Quality Control (18 AAC 50)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  * * * * * * *
18 AAC 50.075....................  Solid Fuel-fired          1/12/2018  6/5/2019, [Insert    Except (d)(2) and
                                    Heating Device                       Federal Register     (f).
                                    Visible Emission                     citation].
                                    Standards.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

                   EPA-Approved Alaska Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Applicable           State
      Name of SIP provision           geographic or        submittal     EPA approval date       Explanations
                                    nonattainment area       date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Recently--Approved Plans
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
II.III.D.5.11 Fairbanks Emergency  Fairbanks North          11/28/2018  6/5/2019, [Insert    Revision to
 Episode Plan.                      Star Borough.                        Federal Register     II.III.D.5.
                                                                         citation].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
III.III.D.5.12 Appendix to Volume  Fairbanks North          11/28/2018  6/5/2019,..........  Revision to pages
 II. Section III.D.5.               Star Borough.                       [Insert Federal       68 through 84 of
                                                                         Register citation].  III.III.D.5.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2019-11620 Filed 6-4-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 226 (Monday, November 27, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 56079]
[FR Doc No: 2017-25463]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-334, OMB Control No. 3235-0380]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736

Extension:
    Form F-10

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved
collection of information discussed below.
    Form F-10 (17 CFR 239.40) is a registration statement under the
Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) that may be used by a
foreign private issuer that: Is incorporated or organized in Canada;
has been subject to, and in compliance with, Canadian reporting
requirements for at least 12 months; and has an aggregate market value
of common stock held by non-affiliates of at least $75 million. The
purpose of this information collection is to permit verification of
compliance with securities law requirements and assure the public
availability of such information. We estimate that Form F-10 takes 25
hours per response and is filed by 77 respondents. We further estimate
that 25% of the 25 hours per response (6.25 hours) is prepared by the
issuer for an annual reporting burden of 481 hours (6.25 hours per
response x 77 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this
information collection at the following Web site, www.reginfo.gov.
Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to:
[email protected]; and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 or send an email
to: [email protected]. Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30
days of this notice.

    Dated: November 20, 2017.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-25463 Filed 11-24-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31246]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14302]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-83548; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2018-001]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on Proceedings To
Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change To
List and Trade the Shares of the GraniteShares Bitcoin ETF and the
GraniteShares Short Bitcoin ETF Under BZX Rule 14.11(f)(4), Trust
Issued Receipts

June 28, 2018.
    On January 5, 2018, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to list and trade
the shares of the GraniteShares Bitcoin ETF and the GraniteShares Short
Bitcoin ETF under BZX Rule 14.11(f)(4). The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal Register on January 18, 2018.\3\
On February 22, 2018, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\4\ the
Commission designated a longer period within which to approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule
change.\5\ On April 5, 2018, the Commission instituted proceedings
under
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b 4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82484 (Jan. 11,
2018), 83 FR 2704 (Jan. 18, 2018).
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82759 (Feb. 22,
2018), 83 FR 8719 (Feb. 28, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \6\ to determine whether to approve
or disapprove the proposed rule change.\7\ The Commission has received
eight comments on the proposed rule change.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82995 (Apr. 5,
2018), 83 FR 15425 (Apr. 10, 2018). Specifically, the Commission
instituted proceedings to allow for additional analysis of the
proposed rule change's consistency with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,
which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national
securities exchange be ``designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade,'' and ``to protect investors and the public
interest.'' See id. at 15426 (citing 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5)).
    \8\ See Letters from Anita Desai (Apr. 6, 2018); Ed Kaleda (Apr.
6, 2018); Don Krohn (Apr. 7, 2018); Adam Malkin (Apr. 8, 2018);
Shravan Kumar (Apr. 11, 2018); David Barnwell (Apr. 12, 2018);
Louise Fitzgerald (Apr. 18, 2018); and Sharon Brown-Hruska, Managing
Director, and Trevor Wagener, Consultant, NERA Economic Consulting
(May 18, 2018). All comments on the proposed rule change are
available on the Commission's website at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboebzx-2018-001/cboebzx2018001.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \9\ provides that, after initiating
disapproval proceedings, the Commission shall issue an order approving
or disapproving the proposed rule change not later than 180 days after
the date of publication of notice of filing of the proposed rule
change. The Commission may extend the period for issuing an order
approving or disapproving the proposed rule change, however, by not
more than 60 days if the Commission determines that a longer period is
appropriate and publishes the reasons for such determination. The
proposed rule change was published for notice and comment in the
Federal Register on January 18, 2018. July 17, 2018, is 180 days from
that date, and September 15, 2018, is 240 days from that date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider this proposed
rule change. Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)
of the Act,\10\ designates September 15, 2018, as the date by which the
Commission shall either approve or disapprove the proposed rule change
(File No. SR-CboeBZX-2018-001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-14302 Filed 7-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 116 (Monday, June 17, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28107-28110]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12655]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-86083; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2019-048]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 4702 To
Establish the ``Midpoint Extended Life Order + Continuous Book'' as a
New Order Type

June 11, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 29, 2019, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 4702 to establish the
``Midpoint Extended Life Order + Continuous Book'' as a new Order Type.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to: (1) Amend Rule 4702(b) to establish the
``Midpoint Extended Life Order + Continuous Book'' or ``M-ELO+CB'' as a
new Order Type on the Exchange; and (2) amend Rule 4703(n) to permit
midpoint orders on the Continuous Book to execute against M-ELO+CBs
when the Midpoint Trade Now Attribute is enabled on such midpoint
orders.

Midpoint Extended Life Orders With Continuous Book

    On March 7, 2018, the Commission issued an order approving the
Exchange's proposal to adopt the Midpoint Extended Life Order or ``M-
ELO'' as a new Order Type.\3\ A M-ELO is a non-displayed order that is
available to all members but interacts only with other M-ELOs. It is
priced at the midpoint between the National Best Bid and Offer
(``NBBO'') and it does not become eligible for execution until it
completes a one-half second holding period (the ``Holding Period'').\4\
Once the Holding Period elapses, a M-ELO becomes eligible for execution
against other M-ELOs on a time-priority basis.\5\ Since its
implementation the Midpoint Extended Life Order Type has achieved its
design expectations. Approximately 12 million shares transact as
Midpoint Extended Life Orders a day, interacting only with other
Midpoint Extended Life Orders thus avoiding interaction with
Intermarket Sweep Orders, IOC Orders and other aggressively price Order
Types.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-82825 (Mar. 7,
2018), 83 FR 10937 (Mar. 13, 2018).
    \4\ If a member modifies a M-ELO during the Holding Period,
other than to decrease the size of the order or to modify the
marking of a sell order as long, short, or short exempt, then such
modification will cause the Holding Period to reset.
    \5\ If a member modifies a M-ELO after the Holding Period
elapses, other than to decrease the size of the order or to modify
the marking of a sell order as long, short, or short exempt, then
such modification will trigger a new Holding Period for the order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    M-ELO+CB is a variation on the M-ELO concept. That is, a M-ELO+CB
is an Order Type that has all of the characteristics and attributes of
a regular M-ELO, except that, in addition to executing against other M-
ELO+CBs and M-ELOs, it also may access additional sources of ``M-ELO-
like'' liquidity on the Exchange's Continuous Book.
    Specifically, if a member enters a M-ELO+CB, then the M-ELO+CB will
be subject to the same one-half second

Holding Period as a regular M-ELO. Upon expiration of the Holding
Period, the M-ELO+CB will become available for execution, at the
midpoint of the NBBO, against other M-ELOs and M-ELO+CBs. Additionally,
it will become eligible to execute, again at the midpoint of the NBBO,
against Non-Displayed Orders with Midpoint Pegging and Midpoint Peg
Post-Only Orders (collectively, ``Midpoint Orders'') if: (1) The
Midpoint Orders have the Midpoint Trade Now Attribute enabled (as
discussed below); (2) the Midpoint Order has rested on the Exchange's
Continuous Book for at least one-half second; (3) no other order is
resting on the Continuous Book that has a more aggressive price than
the current midpoint of the NBBO; and (4) the resting Midpoint Order
fulfills any minimum quantity restriction that exists for the M-ELO+CB.
The execution priority for the above orders will be ranked based on the
time at which such orders become eligible to execute against each
other.
    In all respects other than described above, a M-ELO+CB will be
identical to an ordinary M-ELO. That is, a M-ELO+CB may be assigned a
limit price, in which case it would be: (1) Eligible for execution in
time priority after satisfying the Holding Period if upon acceptance of
the order by the system, the midpoint price is within the limit set by
the participant; or (2) held until the midpoint falls within the limit
set by the participant, at which time the Holding Period would commence
and thereafter the system would make the order eligible for execution
in time priority.
    Also like an ordinary M-ELO, if a M-ELO+CB is modified by a member
(other than to decrease the size of the order or to modify the marking
of a sell order as long, short, or short exempt) during the Holding
Period, the system would restart the Holding Period. Movements in the
NBBO while a MELO+CB is in the Holding Period would not reset the
Holding Period, even if, as a result of the NBBO move, the MELO+CB's
limit price is less aggressive than the NBBO midpoint. Also, if a
MELO+CB has met the Holding Period, but the NBBO midpoint is no longer
within its limit, it would nonetheless be ranked in time priority among
other M-ELOs and M-ELO+CBs if the NBBO later moves such that the
midpoint is within the order's limit price (i.e., no new Holding
Period).
    MELO+CB Orders may be entered via any of the Exchange's order entry
protocols (other than QIX). If there is no NBB or NBO, the Exchange
would accept M-ELO+CBs but would not allow M-ELO+CB executions until
there is an NBBO. M-ELO+CBs would be eligible to execute if the NBBO is
locked. If the NBBO is crossed, M-ELO+CBs would be held by the system
until such time that the NBBO is no longer crossed, at which time they
would be eligible to trade. M-ELO+CBs may be cancelled at any time,
including during the Holding Period.
    M-ELO+CBs would be active only during Market Hours. M-ELO+CBs
entered during Pre-Market Hours would be held by the system in time
priority until Market Hours. M-ELO+CBs entered during Post-Market Hours
would not be accepted by the system, and M-ELO+CBs remaining unexecuted
after 4:00 p.m. ET would be cancelled by the system. M-ELO+CB Orders
would not be eligible for the Exchange's Opening, Halt, and Closing
Crosses.
    M-ELO+CBs must be entered with a size of at least one round lot,
and any shares of a M-ELO+CB remaining after an execution that are less
than one round lot would be cancelled.\6\ M-ELO+CBs may have a minimum
quantity order attribute. M-ELO+CBs may not be designated with a time-
in-force of immediate or cancel and are ineligible for routing. They
also may not have the discretion, reserve size, attribution,
intermarket sweep order, display, or trade now order attributes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Exchange notes that it recently filed a proposal to
allow for odd-lot sized orders to be eligible for M-ELOs. See SR-
NASDAQ-2019-044 (May 20, 2019). If and when the SEC approves this
filing, the Exchange intends for it to also apply to M-ELO+CBs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    M-ELO+CB executions would be reported to Securities Information
Processors and provided in the Exchange's proprietary data feed without
any new or special indication. The Exchange would, however, include in
its existing volume reports delayed weekly aggregated statistics, as
well as delayed monthly aggregated block-sized trading statistics, for
M-ELO+CB executions. Specifically, the Exchange would add to the
existing reports it publishes on Nasdaqtrader.com weekly aggregated
statistics showing the number of shares and transactions of M-ELO+CBs
executed on the Exchange by security. This information would be
published with a two-week delay for NMS stocks in Tier 1 of the LULD
Plan, and a four-week delay for all other NMS stocks. The Exchange also
would add to the existing reports it publishes on Nasdaqtrader.com
monthly aggregated block-sized trading statistics of total shares and
total transactions of M-ELO+CBs executed on the Exchange. This
information would be published no earlier than one month following the
end of the month for which trading was aggregated. Under the proposal,
a transaction would be considered ``block-sized'' if it meets any of
the following criteria: (1) 10,000 or more shares; (2) $200,000 or more
in value; (3) 10,000 or more shares and $200,000 or more in value; (4)
2,000 to 9,999 shares; (5) $100,000 to $199,999 in value; or (6) 2,000
to 9,999 shares and $100,000 to $199,999 in value.
    As part of the surveillance the Exchange currently performs, M-
ELO+CBs would be subject to real-time surveillance to determine if they
are being abused by market participants. In addition, as is the case
for ordinary M-ELOs, the Exchange will monitor the use of M-ELO+CBs
with the intent to apply additional measures, as necessary, to ensure
their usage is appropriately tied to the intent of the Order Type. This
monitoring may include metrics tied to participant behavior, such as
the percentage of M-ELO+CBs that are cancelled prior to the completion
of the Holding Period, the average duration of M-ELO+CBs, and the
percentage of M-ELO+CBs where the NBBO midpoint is within the limit
price when received. The Exchange is committed to determining whether
there is opportunity or prevalence of behavior that is inconsistent
with normal risk management behavior. Manipulative abuse is subject to
potential disciplinary action under the Exchange's Rules, and other
behavior that is not necessarily manipulative but nonetheless
frustrates the purposes of the M-ELO+CB Order Type may be subject to
penalties or other participant requirements to discourage such
behavior, should it occur.
Amending the Midpoint Trade Now Attribute To Enable Execution Against
M-ELO+CB
    To facilitate the establishment of the M-ELO+CB Order Type, the
Exchange concurrently proposes to amend the Midpoint Trade Now
Attribute, at Rule 4703(n), such that if a participant opts to enable
Midpoint Trade Now on a Midpoint Order, then in addition to the normal
functionality that the Attribute provides,\7\ the Attribute would also
permit the Midpoint Order to execute against a M-ELO+CB (provided that
the Midpoint Order meets the eligibility

requirements for doing so). In other words, a Midpoint Order with the
Midpoint Trade Now Attribute enabled would become eligible to execute
against a marketable M-ELO+CB only if it does not first execute against
another order on the Continuous Book within one-half second of its
entry. Executions with M-ELO+CB orders will be trade reported like any
other time they remove liquidity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Midpoint Trade Now Order Attribute presently allows a
resting Order that becomes locked at its non-displayed price by an
incoming Midpoint Peg Post-Only Order to automatically execute
against crossing or locking interest, including potentially against
the Midpoint Peg Post-Only Order that locked the resting Order, as a
liquidity taker. See Rule 4703(n); Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 84621 (Nov. 19, 2018), 83 FR 60514 (Nov. 26, 2018) (SR-NASDAQ-
2018-090).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Example of Use of M-ELO+CB
    The following example demonstrates how the M-ELO+CB will operate in
practice. Assume for purposes of this example that the NBBO remains
constant at $84.00 x $86.00, such that the midpoint is $85.00. At
10:05:27:00 a.m., Participant A enters a Midpoint Order on the
Continuous Book with the Midpoint Trade Now Attribute enabled. The
Midpoint Order is to sell 1,000 shares with a limit price of $85.00.
The Midpoint Order posts to the Continuous Order Book at $85.00. At
10:05:37:00 a.m., Participant B enters a M-ELO+CB to buy 1,000 shares
at $85.00. After the Holding Period expires, the M-ELO+CB posts to the
M-ELO Order Book at $85.00. No other M-ELOs or M-ELO+CBs are available
to execute against the M-ELO+CB at the time it becomes marketable.
Because the Midpoint Order with Midpoint Trade Now has rested on the
Continuous Order Book for more than one-half second, it becomes
eligible to match against the M-ELO+CB, which continues to rest on the
M-ELO Book. Because no other orders are resting on the Continuous Book
with a price more aggressive than the NBBO, the M-ELO+CB will execute
in full against the Midpoint Order at $85.00.
Implementation
    The Exchange plans to implement M-ELO+CB within thirty days after
Commission approval of the proposal. The Exchange will make the M-
ELO+CB available to all members and to all securities upon
implementation. The Exchange will announce the implementation date by
Equity Trader Alert.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The Exchange plans to propose a fee structure for the M-
ELO+CB in a subsequent Commission rule filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\9\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The reasons why the M-ELO+CB Order Type is consistent with the Act
are generally the same as those that the Commission identified in its
order approving the M-ELO Order Type.\11\ The Exchange does not believe
that the design of the M-ELO+CB presents concerns that are unique or
materially different from those that the M-ELO presents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-82825, supra, 83
FR at 10938-41.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For example, just as the Commission determined that the M-ELO
``could create additional and more efficient trading opportunities on
the Exchange for investors with longer investment time horizons,
including institutional investors, and provide these investors with an
ability to limit their information leakage and the market impact that
could result from their orders,'' \12\ so too will the M-ELO+CB do so.
By proposing to add M-ELO+CB as a new Order Type, the Exchange intends
to enhance the utility of the M-ELO concept to investors by providing
them with opportunities to execute M-ELOs where they cannot do so now.
Indeed, a M-ELO+CB will have all of the characteristics and offer all
of the benefits of an ordinary M-ELO, except that it will also afford
M-ELO investors the ability to accomplish their investment strategies
by sourcing liquidity from the Nasdaq Continuous Book, where
approximately 55 million shares trade at Midpoint a day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See id. at 10938-39.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposal would remain consistent with the underlying purpose of
a M-ELO, which is to enable investors to source liquidity on the
Exchange by limiting interaction with intermarket sweep orders or other
aggressively priced order types. By allowing M-ELO+CBs to access
liquidity in the Continuous Book, the Exchange would not dilute the
purpose of the M-ELO because the Exchange would only permit the M-
ELO+CB to access liquidity on the Continuous Book that resembles M-
ELOs--including because eligible orders must have rested on the Book
for at least one-half second and because they must be non-displayed
orders and execute at the midpoint of the NBBO. In addition, the option
to access qualified midpoint liquidity on the continuous book is purely
voluntary.
    The proposal would also benefit those participants with Midpoint
Orders resting on the Exchange's Continuous Book, insofar as the
proposal would provide additional opportunities for such Midpoint
Orders to execute against M-ELO+CBs if the Midpoint Order user
voluntarily chooses to do so.
    Like the M-ELO, the M-ELO+CB will not discriminate unfairly against
other market participants because it will be available for voluntary
use by all Exchange members. Moreover, the proposal is not unfairly
discriminatory against participants that enter Midpoint Orders that
have not rested for at least one-half second because imposition of this
resting condition is necessary to ensure that M-ELO+CBs fulfill their
purpose without the transitory risk of a change to the NBBO that may
have the effect of an adverse execution. And again, participants will
have a choice as to whether they wish for their Midpoint Orders to
interact with M-ELO+CBs.
    Like all M-ELOs and all other orders entered into Nasdaq, the
Exchange will conduct real-time surveillance to monitor the use of M-
ELO+CBs to ensure that such usage is appropriately tied to the intent
of the Order Type. Also like the M-ELO, transactions in M-ELO+CB will
be reported to the Securities Information Processor and will be
provided in Nasdaq's proprietary data feed in the same manner as all
other transactions occurring on Nasdaq are done currently, namely,
without any new or special indication that it is a M-ELO+CB execution.
The Exchange believes that doing so is important to ensuring that
investors are protected from any market impact that may occur if M-ELO
or M-ELO+CB executions were reported with a special indication.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed M-ELO+CB will
negatively affect the quality of the market. To the contrary, the
Exchange believes that the addition of M-ELO+CB will draw new market
participants to the Exchange's transparent and well-regulated market,
including participants that were previously not utilizing M-ELO orders.
Moreover, like the M-ELO, the M-ELO+CB will allow longer term investors
an opportunity to find like-minded counterparties at the midpoint on
Nasdaq. It will also allow participants with Midpoint Orders the option
to choose for their Orders to interact with M-ELO+CBs, and if so, to
execute in circumstances where they would not otherwise. Thus, the
proposal would enhance liquidity opportunities of midpoint executions
on the Exchange.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    The Exchange believes that the introduction of the M-ELO+CB will
only boost the utility of the M-ELO among market participants who want
the benefits of M-ELO but require additional trading flexibility.
Accordingly, the Exchange expects that its proposal will draw new
market participants to Nasdaq and increase the extent to which existing
participants utilize the M-ELO concept. To the extent the proposed
change is successful in attracting additional market participants,
Nasdaq believes that the proposed change will promote competition among
trading venues by making Nasdaq a more attractive trading venue for
long-term investors and therefore capital formation.
    Additionally, adoption of M-ELO+CB will not burden any market
participants. Just as with an ordinary M-ELOs, the M-ELO+CB will be
available to all Nasdaq members and it will be available on an optional
basis. Thus, any member that seeks to avail itself of the benefits of a
M-ELO+CB can choose accordingly. Although the proposal provides
potential benefits for investors that select the M-ELO+CB order type,
the Exchange believes that all market participants will benefit to the
extent that this proposal contributes to a healthy and attractive
market that is attentive to the needs of all types of investors.
    The proposal also will not adversely impact market participants
that choose not to use this M-ELO+CB because no changes need to be made
to participants' systems to account for it. As discussed above, M-
ELO+CB executions will be reported the same as other executions,
without any new or special indicator.
    Similarly, the proposal will benefit members that enter Midpoint
Orders on the Continuous by providing them with flexibility to have
their orders execute in situations where they would not do so now.
Again, however, this flexibility will be optional. Any member that
wants its Midpoint Orders to interact with M-ELO+CBs can choose
accordingly.
    In any event, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily choose
between competing venues if they deem participation in Nasdaq's market
is no longer desirable. In such an environment, the Exchange must
carefully consider the impact that any change it proposes may have on
its participants, understanding that it will likely lose participants
to the extent a change is viewed as unfavorable by them. Because
competitors are free to modify the incentives and structure of their
markets, the Exchange believes that the degree to which modifying the
market structure of an individual market may impose any burden on
competition is limited. Last, to the extent the proposed change is
successful in attracting additional market participants, Nasdaq also
believes that the proposed change will promote competition among
trading venues by making Nasdaq a more attractive trading venue for
long-term investors and therefore capital formation.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2019-048 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2019-048. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2019-048, and should be submitted
on or before July 8, 2019.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-12655 Filed 6-14-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P