[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 24883]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9974]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2012-0024; FRL-9664-3]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Virginia; Removal of Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation Permit
From State Implementation Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia removing the
operating permit for the Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation
(Transco) Station 175 from the Virginia SIP. In the Final Rules section
of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as
a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views
this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the
direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to
this action, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment
period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do
so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received in writing by May 29, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2012-0024 by one of the following methods:
    A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    B. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2012-0024, Cristina Fernandez, Associate
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
    D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2012-0024. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through ww.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal
are available at the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, 629
East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marilyn Powers,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For further information, please see the
information provided in the direct final action, with the same title,
that is located in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this
Federal Register. publication.

    Dated: April 12, 2012.
W.C. Early,
Acting, Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2012-9974 Filed 4-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


MACOSH FactSheet

Guidelines for Safe Entry and Cleaning of Vessel Sewage Tanks

Introduction and Purpose

Sewage systems on vessels are known as Marine Sanitation Devices (MSDs)
or Collection, Holding and Transfer Tanks (CHTs). Sewage tank cleaning
is required for routine surveys and inspections, surface preservation,
equipment modification, repairs and maintenance.

Entry and cleaning of sewage tanks, piping and components are high-risk
operations and they present unique hazards which can lead to injuries
and illnesses to unprotected workers.  (29 CFR 1915.13)

Workers are often exposed to dangerous atmospheres during tank opening
and venting; manual pumping and stripping; breaking or dismantling of
components and piping; pressure-washing, mucking, and scaling.
  (29 CFR 1915.11 (b), 1915.12)

A dangerous atmosphere is an atmosphere that may expose workers to the
risk of death, incapacitation, injury, chronic or acute illness, or
impairment of ability to escape unaided from a confined space or
enclosed space.  (29 CFR 1915.11 (b))

The purpose of this document is to help prevent exposure of workers to
the known and unknown dangers associated with sewage during tank
opening, entry, cleaning and related operations.  (29 CFR 1915.97 (a),
(c))

Special emphasis is made on good hygiene practices, proper use of
personal protective equipment and safe confined space entry procedures.
(29 CFR 1915.97 (b))

Applicability

These guidelines are applicable to the entry, cleaning and handling of
treated or un-treated sewage and gray water tanks; MSD and CHT systems.

Other related components include piping; aeration, vacuum, settling and
treatment tanks and apparatuses; sewage-contaminated water tanks or
waste oil tanks, bilges, or sumps; valves, pumps, grinders, macerators,
and other contaminated equipment.

What is Sewage and Gray Water?

Sewage or “black water” includes wastes from urinals, toilets, any
wastes contaminated by human excrement; effluent solution, suspension
including body wastes and other sanitary wastes.

“Gray water” includes waste waters, uncontaminated by human
excrement from drains, sinks, sculleries, drinking fountains, showers,
washing water, food wastes, laundry waste, etc.

A “cleaned and sanitized” sewage tank.

Common Health Hazards in Tanks

Atmospheric hazards include oxygen-deficiency; flammable and toxic gases
such as methane and hydrogen sulfide. These gases are detectable only by
properly calibrated instruments.     (29 CFR 1915.12)

Methane gas is colorless, odorless and tasteless, but highly flammable
and is considered an asphyxiant.

Hydrogen sulfide is also colorless, but highly odorous, flammable and
extremely toxic to humans and animals. At approximately 100–150 ppm,
the olfactory nerve is paralyzed after a few inhalations. Shortly, the
sense of smell disappears, giving a false sense that the harmful gas has
vacated.

Biological hazards may include bacteria, viruses, protozoa, parasitic
worms, fungi, pathogens, and other infectious microorganisms that can
cause illnesses such as hepatitis, typhoid fever, dysentery and cholera.
Inhalation or ingestion of contaminated mists may result in serious
illnesses.

Physical hazards include slips,  trips and falls due to slippery and
sloping surfaces; punctures and cuts from sharp edges; limited access
and egress; corroded ladder rungs; obstructions by piping and
structures. (29 CFR 1915.91)

Mechanical hazards include unsecured equipment; rotating machinery;
uncontrollable leaks and isolation of waste streams. Often times–not
all piping can be positively shut, blocked or blanked effectively due to
aging or structural design.

Chemical hazards include sewage treatment agents containing ammonium
compounds, formaldehyde, chlorine products, sodium hydroxide,
odor-control and sewage-biodegrading enzymes, sanitizers, biocides,
cleaning or bleaching agents, pharmaceutical drugs; hormones and heavy
metals.

Other hazards may include electrical devices, energized equipment,
inadequate ventilation and poor visibility.

Control Measures Prior to Tank Opening or Pipe Breaking

Assess and review CHT or MSD systems, components and piping.

Perform job-site safety and health analyses and be aware of all
associated risks and hazards. Inform all workers involved. (29 CFR
1915.3 (a))

Post warning signs and labels.     (29 CFR 1915.16)

Follow confined space entry testing and permitting procedures.

Use appropriate tools and operating procedures, gas detectors,  PPE and
respirators.

Install and use adequate exhaust ventilation devices, ducting, lighting
and tank-cleaning equipment.

Cover and isolate all work areas with disposable plastic sheeting to
prevent possible contamination.

Strategically place drip pans at pumps, joints, disconnected piping,
tank’s manhole, clean-outs, drops, etc.

Secure all toilets, urinals, drains, pumps, and sewage treatment
systems.

Isolate, close, secure, divert, de-energize, lockout and tag-out all
valves, piping and associated equipment.

Flush tanks and piping systems; pump and drain all residual products.

Chlorinate or sanitize the tanks and piping systems when applicable.

Check for residual pressure or vacuum affects of tanks and piping.

If feasible, use a gas detector to test for atmospheric contaminants
inside the tank through sample ports.

Cautiously and deliberately proceed to remove bolts and nuts of manholes
and piping--being alert to any immediately change of conditions and be
prepared to take evasive actions.

As soon as the piping is broken or the tank is opened, apply or insert
ducting to begin exhaust ventilation. Pipe all exhausts down wind,
overboard or away from people.                              (29 CFR 1915
Subparts B, D)

	Ventilation blower and ducting

While staying outside of the tank, continue to test the atmosphere
inside the tank remotely for safe conditions.

With proper PPE, clothing and respiratory protection, cautiously enter
the tank for internal inspections prior to commencing tank cleaning
operations.

It is recommended that a NFPA Certified Marine Chemist or Shipyard
Competent Person be present when breaching the sewage system, tank or
piping.

Atmospheric Testing Requirements for Confined Space Entry & Hot Work

No tank entry or cleaning is permitted if atmospheric conditions are
found to be IDLH (Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health).

IDLH means an atmosphere that poses an immediate threat to life or that
is likely to result in acute or immediate severe health effects. (29 CFR
1915.11)

	Test for oxygen, combustible gases and hydrogen sulfide prior to
opening tank and entering

Test and confirm the oxygen levels in the tank and around the work
places are maintained at 20.9% by volume.

Test and confirm the combustible gases are maintained at 0% LEL.

Test and confirm the hydrogen sulfide gas is maintained at 0 ppm.

A Shipyard Competent Person or a NFPA Certified Marine Chemist is
required to test all confined spaces, including sewage tanks, prior to
entry for cleaning. (29 CFR 1915.7, 1915.13)

Sewage tanks and all piping must be tested and visually inspected prior
to any hot work activity. (29 CFR 1915.14)

Respiratory Protection

Wear full-face, supplied-air respirators, with escape-pack, for entry
and cleaning inside a large sewage tank.

Wear full-face, organic vapor/acid gas/HEPA cartridge respirators for
cleaning from outside of a small tank.

Respirator selection should be based on airborne levels of contaminants.
(29 CFR 1915.154)

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

Wear full-body, encapsulating suits outside of liners to protect all
exposed skin, in addition to using rubber boots, gloves, hard hats and
eye protection.   (29 CFR 1915 Subpart I)

Have extra flashlights and two-way radios readied for communication.

Set up first-aid kit, eye-wash and flushing station, neutralizing
solutions, and decontamination equipment.         (29 CFR 1915.153)

	A worker with proper protective equipment for sewage tank entry and
cleaning

Decontamination after Tank Cleaning

Shower or wash face, arms, hands and legs with soap using lots of water.

Disinfect equipment with Betadyne or equivalent and wash contaminated
spaces, decks, bulkheads with detergent, sanitizer, or bleach (29 CFR
1915.152 (d))

Dispose off or re-wash rubber boots, gloves, eye goggles, face shields
and respirators with disinfectant.  (29 CFR 1915.152 (e)(v))

Bag contaminated clothing and wash separately.

Don’t walk into other spaces with contaminated clothing.

Tank Cleaning Procedures

Perform initial cleaning and any additional pumping or stripping through
the opened manhole access.

Pressure-wash, pump-out, evacuate and remove all loose materials.

Manually scrape muck, scale and bag up all hardened/calcified deposits.

Perform secondary pressure-wash and evacuate any remaining products
before sanitizing all surfaces with bleach or sanitizer.

Perform final rinses, squeegee, evacuation, wipe and dry operations.

Sewage Disposal

Dispose of sewage and contaminated liquids, sludge, solids and all tank
cleaning wastes at local or State approved treatment facilities only.

Immunization

Stay current on routine vaccinations such as influenza and tetanus.
Consult with your physician regarding the need for Hepatitis A
vaccination. (NIOSH/CDC)

Minimum Training Requirements (29 CFR 1915.12 (d)

At a minimum, employees should receive training in the following areas:

Confined Space Entry Procedures;

 Hazard Awareness;

Atmospheric Testing;

Calibration of  Gas Detectors;

Proper Use of PPE and Respiratory Protection;

Respirator Selection and Fit-testing;

Tank Cleaning Procedures;

Ventilation and Engineering Controls;

Emergency and Evacuation Procedures; and

HAZMAT or HAZWOPER

Regulations / References / Literature

OSHA’s PELs, 29 CFR 1915.1000 and 29 CFR 1915 Subpart B, D.

www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/shipyard/index.html

ACGIH’s TLVs

NIOSH/CDC’s RELs

NAVSEA Standard Items 009-88; Navy NSTM 593 “Pollution Control”

USCG 33 CFR Part 159 “MSD”

Marine Chemists Association

http://www.nfpa.org/assets/files/pdf/mcdir.pdf

www.aiha.org

 PAGE

 PAGE   4

Exhibit 13


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13374-13375]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05148]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property at
the Ocean County Airport, Toms River, New Jersey

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) DOT.

ACTION: Notice of request to release airport property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invite public comment on the
release of land at the Ocean County Airport, Toms River, New Jersey
under the provision 49 U.S.C. 47125(a). The request consists of a
permanent release of six (6) parcels of land (145.90 acres) that are no
longer needed for aeronautical purposes. Parcels 1 & 3 are located
within Lacey Township and Parcels 2, 4, 5 & 6 are located within
Berkeley Township. The County of Ocean will obtain Fair Market Value
(FMV) rate in the form (reimbursement) of financial contribution made
directly by County to the airport. The County has demonstrated its
financial contribution to the airport of the parcels to be released,
which has been expended for on airport operations and development over
a six-year period (2006-2011). Therefore, no funds will change hands
for the release of these parcels from aeronautical purposes.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 9, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to
the following address:

David J McKeon, Planning Director, Ocean County Airport, Ocean County
Planning Board,, P. O. Box 2191, Toms, River, New Jersey 08754-2191,
732-929-2054
and at the FAA Harrisburg Airports District Office:
Lori K. Pagnanelli, Manager, Harrisburg Airports District Office, 3905
Hartzdale Dr., Suite 508, Camp Hill, PA 17011,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Harner, Project Manager,
Harrisburg Airports District Office, location listed above.
    The request to release property may be reviewed in person at this
same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the
request to release property at the Ocean County Airport under the
provisions of Section 47125(a) of Title 49 U.S.C. On March 10, 2014,
the FAA determined that the request to release property at the Ocean
County Airport (MJX), New Jersey, submitted by the County of Ocean, met
the procedural requirements.
    The following is a brief overview of the request: The County of
Ocean requests the release of real property totaling 145.90 acres to
the County of Ocean for use as non-aeronautical land with the exception
of granting an easement right of way on Parcels 3 and 4 as defined
below. Land release of Parcel 1 (Highway Department vehicle storage and
maintenance) consists of 14.22 acres located within the Township of
Lacey. The parcel is bounded by Lacey Township line on the east and the
existing airport property line on the west and north and extends to the
southerly boundary of existing Mule Road on the south. Land release of
Parcel 2 (County Fairgrounds) consists of 103.77 acres located within
the Township of Berkeley. This parcel extends easterly from Berkeley
Township line on the west to the west ROW of Pinewald-Keswick Road. The
parcel is bounded by the existing airport property line on the north
and extends to the southerly boundary of existing Mule Road on the
south. Land release of Parcel 5 (Public Safety Building) consists of
5.38 acres located within the Township of Berkeley. This parcel is
bounded on the north by the south boundary of existing Mule Road; on
the west at 20 feet east of the centerline of the existing airport
access road; and on the south and east sides following between two
airport fence lines. Land release of Parcel 6 (Vacant land--south side
of Mule Rd/Route 530 intersection) consists of 3.27 acres located
within the Township of Berkeley. The perimeter of this parcel follows
ten feet inside the existing fence line of the parcel (landside). The
parcel is bounded by the southerly boundary of existing Mule Road on
the north; and bounded by the westerly boundary of Pinewald-Keswick
Road on the east. The south line of the parcel is the westerly
extension of the

northerly airport property line located easterly of Pinewald-Keswick
Road.
    The County of Ocean also requests the release of real property
totaling 19.26 acres in addition to the granting of an access easement
right of way on same parcels for use as spoil storage area and a dog
park. Parcel 3 (Highway Department Spoil Area) consists of 16.52 acres
located within the Township of Lacey. The parcel consists of a
rectangular parcel 1200 feet long by 600 feet wide adjacent and at
right angles to the Lacey Township line. The east corner of the parcel
is located 145 feet southeast of the centerline of the existing sand
entry road to the spoil area. Parcel 4 (Dog Park) consists of 2.74
acres located within the Township of Berkeley. The perimeter of this
parcel is located 10 feet outside of the existing dog park fence line.
The south line of the parcel is 20 feet north of the centerline of the
existing airport access road pavement. As shown on the Airport Layout
Plan (ALP), the above describe properties do not serve an aeronautical
purpose and are not needed for airport development.
    No AIP funds were used to purchase the parcels to be released. All
of the parcels were acquired through either condemnation or fee simple
purchase with County funds. The ALP will be updated to show the new
airport property boundary. The airport property will be released to the
County and will remain County owned.
    Any person may inspect the request by appointment at the FAA office
address listed above. Interested persons are invited to comment on the
proposed lease. All comments will be considered by the FAA to the
extent practicable.

    Issued in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, February 28, 2014.
Lori K. Pagnanelli,
Manager, Harrisburg Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 2014-05148 Filed 3-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 26 (Thursday, February 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9100-9102]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02712]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-68818; File No. SR-BX-2013-010]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Extend
a Pilot Program Related to Rule 11890, entitled ``Clearly Erroneous
Transactions''

February 1, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that on January 31, 2013, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``BX'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    BX is filing with the Commission a proposal to extend a pilot
program related to Rule 11890, entitled ``Clearly Erroneous
Transactions.'' The Exchange also proposes to adopt new paragraph (g)
to Rule 11890 in connection with the upcoming operation of the Plan to
Address Extraordinary Market Volatility Pursuant to Rule 608 of
Regulation NMS under the Act (the ``Limit Up-Limit Down Plan'' or
``Plan'').\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May 31,
2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012) (the ``Limit Up-Limit Down
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this filing is to extend the effectiveness of the
Exchange's current rule applicable to Clearly Erroneous Transactions
and to adopt new paragraph (g) to Rule 11890 in connection with
upcoming operation of the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan.
Proposal To Extend Pilot
    Portions of Rule 11890, explained in further detail below, are
currently operating as a pilot program set to expire on February 4,
2013.\4\ The Exchange proposes to extend the pilot program to September
30, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67570 (August 2,
2012), 77 FR 47486 (August 8, 2012) (SR-BX-2012-056).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On September 10, 2010, the Commission approved, on a pilot basis,
changes to Exchange Rule 11890 to provide for uniform treatment: (1) Of
clearly erroneous transaction reviews in multi-stock events involving
twenty or more securities; and (2) in the event transactions occur that
result in the issuance of an individual stock trading pause by the
primary market and

subsequent transactions that occur before the trading pause is in
effect on the Exchange.\5\ The Exchange also adopted additional changes
to Rule 11890 that reduced the ability of the Exchange to deviate from
the objective standards set forth in Rule 11890.\6\ The Exchange
believes the benefits to market participants from the more objective
clearly erroneous transactions rule should continue on a pilot basis
through September 30, 2013, which is the date that the Exchange
anticipates that the phased implementation of the Limit Up-Limit Down
Plan will be complete. As explained in further detail below, although
the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan is intended to prevent transactions that
would need to be nullified as clearly erroneous, the Exchange believes
that certain protections should be maintained while the industry gains
initial experience operating with the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan,
including the provisions of Rule 11890 that currently operate as a
pilot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63490 (December 9,
2010), 75 FR 78299 (December 15, 2010) (SR-BX-2010-086).
    \6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed Limit Up-Limit Down Provision to Rule 11890
    The Exchange proposes to adopt new paragraph (g) to Rule 11890, to
provide that the existing provisions of Rule 11890 will continue to
apply to all Exchange transactions, including transactions in
securities subject to the Plan, other than as set forth in proposed
paragraph (g). Accordingly, other than as proposed below, the Exchange
proposes to maintain and continue to apply the Clearly Erroneous
Transaction standards in the same way that it does today. Notably, this
means that the Exchange might nullify transactions that occur within
the price bands disseminated pursuant to the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan
to the extent such transactions qualify as clearly erroneous under
existing criteria. As an example, assume that a Tier 1 security
pursuant to the Plan has a reference price pursuant to both the Plan
and Rule 11890 of $100.00. The lower pricing band under the Plan would
be $95.00 and the upper pricing band under the Plan would be $105.00.
An execution could occur on the Exchange in this security at $96.00, as
this is within the Plan's pricing bands. However, if subjected to
review as potentially clearly erroneous, the Exchange would nullify an
execution at $96.00 as clearly erroneous because it exceeds the 3%
threshold that is in place pursuant to Rule 11890(a)(2)(C)(1) for
securities priced above $50.00 (i.e., with a reference price of
$100.00, any transactions at or below $97.00 or above $103.00 could be
nullified as clearly erroneous). Accordingly, this proposal maintains
the status quo with respect to reviews of Clearly Erroneous
Transactions and the application of objective numerical guidelines by
the Exchange. The proposal does not increase the discretion afforded to
the Exchange in connection with reviews of Clearly Erroneous
Transactions.
    The Limit Up-Limit Down Plan is designed to prevent executions from
occurring outside of dynamic price bands disseminated to the public by
the single plan processor as defined in the Limit Up-Limit Down
Plan.\7\ The possibility remains that the Exchange could experience a
technology or systems problem with respect to the implementation of the
price bands disseminated pursuant to the Plan. To address such
possibilities, the Exchange proposes to adopt language to make clear
that if an Exchange technology or systems issue results in any
transaction occurring outside of the price bands disseminated pursuant
to the Plan, a Senior Official of the Exchange, acting on his or her
own motion or at the request of a third party, shall review and declare
any such trades null and void. Absent extraordinary circumstances, any
such action of the Senior Official of the Exchange shall be taken in a
timely fashion, generally within thirty (30) minutes of the detection
of the erroneous transaction. When extraordinary circumstances exist,
any such action of the Senior Official of the Exchange must be taken by
no later than the start of Regular Trading Hours \8\ on the trading day
following the date on which the execution(s) under review occurred.
Although the Exchange will act as promptly as possible and the proposed
objective standard (i.e., whether an execution occurred outside the
band) should make it feasible to quickly make a determination, there
may be circumstances in which additional time may be needed for
verification of facts or coordination with outside parties, including
the single plan processor responsible for disseminating the price bands
and other market centers. Accordingly, the Exchange believes it
necessary to maintain some flexibility to make a determination outside
of the thirty (30) minute guideline. In addition, the Exchange proposes
that a transaction that is nullified pursuant to new paragraph (g)
would be appealable in accordance with the provisions of Rule 11890(c).
In addition, the Exchange proposes to make clear that in the event that
a single plan processor experiences a technology or systems problem
that prevents the dissemination of price bands, the Exchange would make
the determination of whether to nullify transactions based on Rule
11890(a)-(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Limit Up-Limit Down Release, supra note 3.
    \8\ Regular Trading Hours commence at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time.
See Exchange Rule 11890(a)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that cancelling trades that occur outside of
the price bands disseminated pursuant to the Plan is consistent with
the purpose and intent of the Plan, as such transactions are not
intended to occur in the first place. If transactions do occur outside
of the price bands and no exception applies--which necessarily would be
caused by a technology or systems issue--then the Exchange believes the
appropriate result is to nullify such transactions.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular,
with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\9\ In particular, the
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ because it
would promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove
impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system. The Exchange believes that the pilot
program promotes just and equitable principles of trade in that it
promotes transparency and uniformity across markets concerning review
of transactions as clearly erroneous. More specifically, the Exchange
believes that the extension of the pilot would help assure that the
determination of whether a clearly erroneous trade has occurred will be
based on clear and objective criteria, and that the resolution of the
incident will occur promptly through a transparent process. The
proposed rule change would also help assure consistent results in
handling erroneous trades across the U.S. markets, thus furthering fair
and orderly markets, the protection of investors and the public
interest. Although the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan will be operational
during the same time period as the proposed extended pilot, the
Exchange believes that maintaining the pilot for at least through the
phased implementation of the Plan is operational will help to protect
against unanticipated

consequences. To that end, the extension will allow the Exchange to
determine whether Rule 11890 is necessary once the Plan is operational
and, if so, whether improvements can be made. Further, the Exchange
believes it consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest to adopt objective criteria to nullify transactions that occur
outside of the Plan's price bands when such transactions should not
have been executed but were due to a systems or technology issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change
implicates any competitive issues. To the contrary, the Exchange
believes that FINRA and other national securities exchanges are also
filing similar proposals, and thus, that the proposal will help to
ensure consistent rules across market centers.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the proposed rule change does not (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative
delay so that the proposal may become operative immediately upon
filing. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay
is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest,
as it will allow the pilot program to continue uninterrupted, thereby
avoiding the investor confusion that could result from a temporary
interruption in the pilot program. For this reason, the Commission
designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon filing.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BX-2013-010 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2013-010. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room on official business
days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal offices of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-BX-2013-010, and should be submitted on or before
February 28, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-02712 Filed 2-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 196 (Thursday, October 14, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57081-57083]
[FR Doc No: 2021-22252]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0794; Project Identifier AD-2021-00400-T]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain The Boeing Company Model 747-400, -400D, and -400F series
airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of burned Boeing
Material Specification (BMS) 8-39 urethane foam, and a report from the
airplane manufacturer that airplanes were assembled with seals
throughout various areas of the airplane (including flight deck and
cargo compartments) made of BMS 8-39 urethane foam, a material with
fire-retardant properties that deteriorate with age. This proposed AD
would require replacing the system tube/wire seals made of BMS 8-39
urethane foam in certain areas of the airplane. The FAA is proposing
this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by November
29, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS),
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
view this service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products
Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0794.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0794; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for Docket
Operations is listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Linn, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin
Safety and Environmental Systems Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2021-0794; Project Identifier
AD-2021-00400-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Julie
Linn, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems
Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA
98198; phone and fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected]. Any
commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated
as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.

Background

    The FAA has received reports of burned BMS 8-39 urethane foam, and
a report from the airplane manufacturer that airplanes were assembled
with seals throughout various areas of the airplane (including flight
deck and cargo compartments) made of BMS 8-39 urethane foam, a material
with fire-retardant properties that deteriorate with age. The fire
retardants in BMS 8-39 urethane foam are mixed into, but are not
chemically connected with, the remaining components of the foam, which
causes the fire retardants to have decreased fire resistance over time.
The degraded material can be an unacceptable fuel source for a fire if
exposed to an ignition source. This condition, if not addressed, could
result in failure of the urethane seals to maintain sufficient Halon
concentrations in the cargo compartments to extinguish or contain fire
or smoke, and to prevent penetration of fire or smoke in areas of the
airplane that are difficult to access

for fire and smoke detection or suppression.

Related AD

    The FAA issued AD 2013-11-04, Amendment 39-17464 (78 FR 33193, June
4, 2013) (AD 2013-11-04), which applies to certain The Boeing Company
Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200F, 747-300,
747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes; Model
767-200, -300, -300F, and -400ER series airplanes; and Model 777-200, -
200LR, -300, and -300ER series airplanes. AD 2013-11-04 requires
replacing certain seals made of BMS 8-39 urethane foam. AD 2013-11-04
was prompted by operator or in-service reports of burned BMS 8-39
urethane foam, and a report from the airplane manufacturer indicating
that airplanes were assembled, throughout various areas of the airplane
(including flight deck and cargo compartments), with seals made of BMS
8-39 urethane foam, a material with fire-retardant properties that
deteriorate with age.

Actions Since AD 2013-11-04 Was Issued

    Since AD 2013-11-04 was issued, the FAA has determined that
additional replacements of system tube/wire seals made of BMS 8-39
urethane foam are necessary for certain Model 747-400, -400D, and -400F
series airplanes. These new proposed actions apply only to certain
airplanes and would not replace or terminate the actions required by AD
2013-11-04.

FAA's Determination

    The FAA is issuing this NPRM after determining that the unsafe
condition described previously is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-25-
3381, Revision 3, dated February 19, 2021. This service information
specifies procedures for replacing BMS 8-39 urethane foam seals with
BMS 1-68 silicone foam rubber seals (including doing a general visual
inspection of the foam for any tube or wire penetrations and sealing
any penetrations that go through the insulation blankets). This service
information adds the work instructions for Group 11, Configuration 2;
Group 13 and 14, Configuration 4; and Group 16, 17, and 19,
Configuration 5 airplanes.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in ADDRESSES.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information already described. For information on the
procedures and compliance times, see this service information at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2021-0794.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 131 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following
costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Action                  Labor cost      Parts cost     Cost per  product      Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement (including GVI)...  Up to 32 work-             $ *  Up to $2,720...........  Up to $356,320.
                                 hours x $85 per
                                 hour = Up to
                                 $2,720.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The FAA has received no definitive data on which to base the parts cost estimates for this proposed AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2021-0794; Project Identifier AD-
2021-00400-T.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by November 29, 2021.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-400, -400D, and
-400F series airplanes, certificated in any category,

identified as Group 11, Configuration 2; Group 13 and 14,
Configuration 4; and Group 16, 17, and 19, Configuration 5, in
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-25-3381, Revision 3,
dated February 19, 2021.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 25, Equipment/
Furnishings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of burned Boeing Material
Specification (BMS) 8-39 urethane foam, and a report from the
airplane manufacturer that airplanes were assembled with seals
throughout various areas of the airplane (including flight deck and
cargo compartments) made of BMS 8-39 urethane foam, a material with
fire-retardant properties that deteriorate with age. The FAA is
issuing this AD to prevent failure of the urethane seals to maintain
sufficient Halon concentrations in the cargo compartments to
extinguish or contain fire or smoke, and to prevent penetration of
fire or smoke in areas of the airplane that are difficult to access
for fire and smoke detection or suppression.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) BMS 8-39 Urethane Foam Seal Replacements

    Within 72 months after the effective date of this AD: Replace
the BMS 8-39 urethane foam seals in the forward cargo compartment
system tube/wire (including doing a general visual inspection of the
foam for any tube or wire penetrations and sealing any penetrations
that go through the insulation blankets) with BMS 1-68 silicone foam
rubber seals, as applicable, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-25-
3381, Revision 3, dated February 19, 2021.

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office,
as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of
the certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in Related Information. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.

(i) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Julie Linn,
Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Section,
FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
phone and fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued on September 16, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-22252 Filed 10-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12452-12454]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4638]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30828 ; Amdt. No. 3466 ]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective March 1, 2012. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums,

and ODP is specified in the amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of March 1, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matters incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For Examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability--All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available
online free of charge. Visit http://www.nfdc.faa.gov to register.
Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP copies may
be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard A. Dunham III, Flight
Procedure Standards Branch (AFS-420), Flight Technologies and Programs
Divisions, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration,
Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK. 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by establishing,
amending, suspending, or revoking SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and/or ODPS.
The complete regulators description of each SIAP and its associated
Takeoff Minimums or ODP for an identified airport is listed on FAA form
documents which are incorporated by reference in this amendment under 5
U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 CFR part 97.20. The applicable FAA
Forms are FAA Forms 8260-3, 8260-4, 8260-5, 8260-15A, and 8260-15B when
required by an entry on 8260-15A.
    The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, in addition
to their complex nature and the need for a special format make
publication in the Federal Register expensive and impractical.
Furthermore, airmen do not use the regulatory text of the SIAPs,
Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead refer to their depiction on
charts printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. The advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP listed on
FAA forms is unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR
sections and specifies the types of SIAPs and the effective dates of
the, associated Takeoff Minimums and ODPs. This amendment also
identifies the airport and its location, the procedure, and the
amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP as contained in the
transmittal. Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and textual ODP amendments
may have been issued previously by the FAA in a Flight Data Center
(FDC) Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency action of immediate
flight safety relating directly to published aeronautical charts. The
circumstances which created the need for some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums
and ODP amendments may require making them effective in less than 30
days. For the remaining SIAPS and Takeoff Minimums and ODPS, an
effective date at least 30 days after publication is provided.
    Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPS contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these SIAPS and
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied to the
conditions existing or anticipated at the affected airports. Because of
the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and
public procedures before adopting these SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and
ODPs are impracticable and contrary to the public interest and, where
applicable, that good cause exists for making some SIAPs effective in
less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule '' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,1979) ;
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air traffic control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 17, 2012.
John McGraw,
Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations, part 97 (14 CFR part 97) is amended by
establishing, amending, suspending, or revoking Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures and/or Takeoff Minimums and/or Obstacle Departure
Procedures effective at 0902 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

* * * Effective 5 APR 2012

Petersburg, AK, Petersburg James A Johnson, RNAV (GPS)-B, Orig-A
Burbank, CA, Bob Hope, ILS OR LOC Z RWY 8, Amdt 37
Burbank, CA, Bob Hope, LOC Y RWY 8, Amdt 4
Colorado Springs, CO, City of Colorado Springs Muni, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 10
Craig, CO, Craig-Moffat, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 4
Durango, CO, Durango-La Plata County, VOR/DME RWY 3, Amdt 5
Pueblo, CO, Pueblo Memorial, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt
5

Dunnellon, FL, Marion County, GPS RWY 23, Orig-B, CANCELLED
Dunnellon, FL Marion County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Orig
Inverness, FL, Inverness, RNAV (GPS) RWY 1, Orig
Inverness, FL, Inverness, RNAV (GPS) RWY 19, Orig
Inverness, FL, Inverness, Takeoff Minimums & Obstacle DP, Orig
Jacksonville, FL, Herlong Recreational, GPS RWY 25, Orig, CANCELLED
Jacksonville, FL, Herlong Recreational, RNAV (GPS) RWY 25, Orig
Jacksonville, FL, Herlong Recreational, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 2
Miami, FL, Miami Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 8R, Amdt 30B
Hilo, HI, Hilo Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 26, Amdt 13
Mapleton, IA, James G Whiting Memorial Field, NDB RWY 20, Amdt 5
Osceola, IA, Osceola Muni, GPS RWY 18, Orig, CANCELLED
Osceola, IA, Osceola Muni, GPS RWY 36, Orig, CANCELLED
Osceola, IA, Osceola Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Orig
Osceola, IA, Osceola Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig
De Kalb, IL, De Kalb Taylor Muni, ILS OR LOC RWY 2, Orig-B
De Kalb, IL, De Kalb Taylor Muni, NDB RWY 27, Orig, CANCELLED
Hazard, KY, Wendell H. Ford, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt
3
Somerset, KY, Lake Cumberland Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Amdt 4
Dexter, ME, Dexter Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 1
Grand Ledge, MI, Abrams Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt
3
Billings, MT, Billings Logan Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 10L, Amdt 25
Billings, MT, Billings Logan Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 10L, Amdt 2
Billings, MT, Billings Logan Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 28R, Amdt 2
Billings, MT, Billings Logan Intl, Takeoff Minimums & Obstacle DP,
Amdt 6
Billings, MT, Billings Logan Intl, VOR-A, Amdt 2
Billings, MT, Billings Logan Intl, VOR/DME RWY 28R, Amdt 14
Pinehurst/Southern Pines, NC, Moore County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Orig
Gordon, NE., Gordon Muni, NDB RWY 22, Amdt 4
Grant, NE., Grant Muni, VOR/DME RWY 15, Amdt 1
Saratoga Springs, NY, Saratoga County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Amdt 1B
Kenton, OH, Hardin County, VOR-A, Amdt 4, CANCELLED
Shelby, OH, Shelby Community, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt
2
Carlisle, PA, Carlisle, RNAV (GPS)--C, Orig
Carlisle, PA, Carlisle, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 1
Dubois, PA, Dubois Rgnl, ILS OR LOC RWY 25, Amdt 9A
Lancaster, PA, Lancaster, RNAV (GPS) RWY 13, Amdt 1
Philadelphia, PA, Northeast Philadelphia, RNAV (GPS) RWY 15, Amdt 1
Philadelphia, PA, Northeast Philadelphia, RNAV (GPS) RWY 33, Amdt 1
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX, Dallas/Fort Worth International, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 5
Mexia, TX, Mexia-Limestone Co, GPS RWY 36, Orig-A, CANCELLED
Mexia, TX, Mexia-Limestone Co, NDB-A, Amdt 4
Mexia, TX, Mexia-Limestone Co, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig
Monahans, TX, Roy Hurd Memorial, VOR/DME RWY 12, Amdt 1B
Rockport, TX, Aransas County, NDB RWY 14, Amdt 1, CANCELLED
Vernon, TX, Wilbarger County, NDB RWY 20, Amdt 1, CANCELLED
Milford, UT, Milford Muni/Ben and Judy Briscoe Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY
16, Orig
Milford, UT, Milford Muni/Ben and Judy Briscoe Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY
34, Orig
Milford, UT, Milford Muni/Ben and Judy Briscoe Field, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 2
Milford, UT, Milford Muni/Ben and Judy Briscoe Field, VOR/DME-A,
Amdt 4
Emporia, VA, Emporia-Greensville Rgnl, LOC RWY 33, Amdt 1
Emporia, VA, Emporia-Greensville Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 15, Amdt 1
Emporia, VA, Emporia-Greensville Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 33, Amdt 1
Luray, VA, Luray Caverns, NDB-A, Amdt 7
Luray, VA, Luray Caverns, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Orig
Luray, VA, Luray Caverns, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Amdt 1
Luray, VA, Luray Caverns, VOR/DME-B, Amdt 3
Norfolk, VA, Norfolk Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 5, Amdt 26
Norfolk, VA, Norfolk Intl, RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 5, Amdt 1A
Norfolk, VA, Norfolk Intl, RNAV (RNP) Y RWY 5, Orig-A
Warrenton, VA, Warrenton-Fauquier, LOC/DME RWY 15, Orig
Warrenton, VA, Warrenton-Fauquier, RNAV (GPS) RWY 15, Amdt 1
Warrenton, VA, Warrenton-Fauquier, RNAV (GPS) RWY 33, Orig
Charlotte Amalie, VQ, Cyril E King, RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Amdt 1B

[FR Doc. 2012-4638 Filed 2-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: October 23, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 204)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 59971-59973]
[DOCID:fr23oc07-13]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 73

[Docket No. FAA-2007-28632; Airspace Docket No. 07-ASW-3]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Modification of Restricted Area 3404; Crane, IN

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify Restricted Area 3404 (R-3404)
at Crane, IN. The United States (U.S.) Navy requests that the FAA take
action to modify R-3404 for the protection of nonparticipating aircraft
from fragments generated during the disposal of a variety of types of
ordnance.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 7, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2007-
28632 and Airspace Docket No. 07-ASW-3, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Rohring, Airspace and Rules
Group, Office of System Operations Airspace and AIM, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2007-28632 and Airspace Docket No. 07-ASW-3) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to FAA Docket No. FAA-2007-28632 and Airspace Docket No. 07-ASW-3.''
The postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRM's

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov Recently published rulemaking documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://.

www.faa.gov or the Federal Register's Web page at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html
.

    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person at the Docket
Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone
number) between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the Central Service Center, Federal
Aviation Administration, 2601 Meacham Blvd; Fort Worth, TX 76193-0500.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRM's should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

History

    On January 31, 2007, the U.S. Navy requested that the FAA take
action to modify R-3404. The requested action is needed to provide
additional airspace to protect nonparticipating aircraft from blast
fragments generated during the disposal of a variety of types of
ordnance at the Naval Support Activity Crane's (NSA Crane) Demolition
Range.

The Proposal

    At the request of the U.S. Navy, the FAA is proposing an amendment
to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 73 to modify R-
3404. The modification would better center the restricted area over NSA
Crane's blast area, enlarge the restricted area from a 1/2-nm radius to
a 1-nm radius, increase the ceiling from 2,500 feet MSL to 4,100 feet
MSL, and change the name of the using agency from ``Commanding Officer,
Naval Ammunition Depot, Crane, IN'' to ``U.S. Navy, Crane Division,
Naval Surface Warfare Center tenant of NSA Crane.''
    Section 73.34 of Title 14 CFR part 73 was republished in FAA Order
7400.8N, effective February 16, 2007.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under Department of Transportation (DOT)
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would modify R-3404, Crane, IN., for the protection of
nonparticipating aircraft during the disposal of a variety of types of
ordnance.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subjected to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures,'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73

    Airspace, Prohibited areas, Restricted areas.

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 73 as follows:

PART 73--SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  73.34  [Amended]

    2. Sec.  73.34 is amended as follows:
* * * * *

R-3404--Crane, IN [Revised]

    Boundaries. That airspace within a 1 NM radius of lat.
38[deg]49'30'' N., long. 86[deg]50'08'' W.
    Designated altitudes. Surface to and including 4,100 feet MSL.
    Times of Designation. Sunrise to sunset, daily from May 1
through and including November 1. Other times by NOTAM 24 hours in
advance.
    Controlling Agency. FAA, Terre Haute ATCT.
    Using Agency. U.S. Navy, Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare
Center tenant of NSA Crane

* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, October 16, 2007.
Paul Gallant,
Acting Manager, Airspace and Rules Group.
[FR Doc. E7-20795 Filed 10-22-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 69 (Thursday, April 10, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19814-19815]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08011]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 510 and 558

[Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0002]

New Animal Drugs for Use in Animal Feeds; Withdrawal of Approval
of New Animal Drug Applications; Bambermycins; Hygromycin B;
Lincomycin; Pyrantel; Tylosin; Tylosin and Sulfamethazine;
Virginiamycin

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal
drug regulations to reflect the withdrawal of approval of 19 new animal
drug applications (NADAs) for certain Type A medicated articles and
Type B medicated feeds. This action is being taken at the sponsors'
request because these products are no longer manufactured or marketed.

DATES: This final rule is effective April 21, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Bartkowiak, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV-212), Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following 5 sponsors have requested that
FDA withdraw approval of the 19 NADAs listed in the following tables
because the products are no longer manufactured or marketed:
     ADM Alliance Nutrition, Inc., 1000 North 30th St., Quincy,
IL 62305-3115:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               NADA                             Product name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
091-582 \1\.......................  Gilt Edge TYLAN (tylosin phosphate)
                                     Mix.
108-484 \1\.......................  HFA Tylosin-10 Plus Sulfa (tylosin
                                     phosphate and sulfamethazine).
110-045 \1\.......................  Good Life TYLAN 10 (tylosin
                                     phosphate) Premix.
110-439 \1\.......................  HFA HYGROMIX 0.48 (hygromycin B)
                                     Medicated Premix.
128-411 \1\.......................  TYLAN 5 Sulfa (tylosin phosphate and
                                     sulfamethazine) Premix.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Micro Beef Technologies LTD, P.O. Box 9262, Amarillo, TX
79105:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               NADA                             Product name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
138-187 \1\.......................  TYLAN 40 or 100 (tylosin phosphate).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Ridley USA, Inc. d/b/a Ridley Feed Ingredients, 1609 First
Ave., P.O. Box 110, Mendota, IL 61342:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               NADA                             Product name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
099-468 \1\.......................  Waynextra for Swine (tylosin
                                     phosphate).
131-958 \1\.......................  TYLAN Sulfa-G (tylosin phosphate and
                                     sulfamethazine).
132-136...........................  Ban-A-Worm II (pyrantel tartrate).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Provimi North America, Inc., 6531 State Rte. 503,
Lewisburg, OH 45338:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               NADA                           Proprietary name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
103-089 \1\.......................  TYLAN 5, 10, 20, or 40 (tylosin
                                     phosphate).
118-814...........................  WORM-BAN 5 or 10 (pyrantel
                                     tartrate).
127-508 \1\.......................  HYGROMIX 0.6 (hygromycin B).
131-413...........................  FLAVOMYCIN 0.4 or 2 (bambermycins).
133-333 \1\.......................  STAFAC 10 (virginiamycin).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Virbac AH, Inc., 3200 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               NADA                           Proprietary name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
013-214 \1\.......................  PURINA HYGROMIX (hygromycin B) for
                                     Swine.
042-660 \1\.......................  PURINA Pork-Plus (tylosin phosphate
                                     and sulfamethazine).
043-387 \1\.......................  PURINA Hog Plus II (tylosin
                                     phosphate).
099-767 \1\.......................  PURINA TYLAN 40 (tylosin) Plus
                                     Sulfamethazine.
132-574 \1\.......................  PURINA Check-R-Ton Ll (lincomycin
                                     hydrochloride).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The NADAs listed were identified as being affected by guidance for
  industry (GFI) 213, ``New Animal Drugs and New Animal Drug
  Combination Products Administered in or on Medicated Feed or Drinking
  Water of Food-Producing Animals: Recommendations for Drug Sponsors for
  Voluntarily Aligning Product Use Conditions With GFI 209,''
  December 2013.

    Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA gave notice
that approval of the NADAs listed in this document, and all supplements
and amendments thereto, is withdrawn. As provided in the regulatory
text of this document, the animal drug regulations are amended to
reflect these voluntary withdrawals of approval.
    In addition, FDA has noticed that conditions of use continue to be
listed for an NADA that was voluntarily withdrawn in 1989. At this
time, the regulations are being amended to remove the sponsor listing
from the tables in 21 CFR 510.600(c) and the drug labeler code from 21
CFR 558.625. This action is being taken to improve the accuracy of the
regulations.
    This rule does not meet the definition of ``rule'' in 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(A) because it is a rule of ``particular applicability.''
Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements
in 5 U.S.C. 801-808.

List of Subjects

21 CFR Part 510

    Administrative practice and procedure, Animal drugs, Labeling,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

21 CFR Part 558

    Animal drugs, Animal feeds.

    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
the authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and
redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR parts 510 and
558 are amended as follows:

PART 510--NEW ANIMAL DRUGS

0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 510 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 353, 360b, 371, 379e.

0
2. In Sec.  510.600, in the table in paragraph (c)(1), remove the
entries for ``Gossett Nutrition, Inc.'', ``Micro Beef Technologies
LTD'', ``Provimi North America, Inc.'', and ``Wayne Feed Division,
Continental Grain Co.''; and in the table in paragraph (c)(2), remove
the entries for ``017790'', ``034936'', ``047126'', and ``050972''.

PART 558--NEW ANIMAL DRUGS FOR USE IN ANIMAL FEEDS

0
3. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 558 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b, 371.

Sec.  558.95  [Amended]

0
4. In Sec.  558.95, in paragraph (a)(2), remove ``Nos. 012286 and
017790'' and in its place add ``No. 012286''; and in paragraphs
(d)(2)(i) and (ii), and paragraphs (d)(3)(i) and (ii), in the
``Sponsor'' column, remove ``017790''.

Sec.  558.274  [Amended]

0
5. In Sec.  558.274, in paragraph (a) introductory text, remove ``or
Type B medicated feeds''; remove paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3);
redesignate paragraph (a)(4) as paragraph (a)(2); and in paragraphs
(c)(1)(i) and (c)(2)(i), in the ``Sponsor'' column, remove ``012286''
and ``017790''.

0
6. In Sec.  558.325, redesignate paragraphs (a) through (d) as
paragraphs (b) through (e), add new paragraph (a), revise newly
redesignated paragraph (b), and in newly redesignated paragraph (e)(2),
in the ``Sponsor'' column, remove ``051311'' wherever it occurs.
    The addition and revision read as follows:

Sec.  558.325  Lincomycin.

    (a) Specifications. Type A medicated articles containing 20 or 50
grams per pound lincomycin as lincomycin hydrochloride.
    (b) Sponsor. See No. 054771 in Sec.  510.600(c) of this chapter.
* * * * *

Sec.  558.485  [Amended]

0
7. In Sec.  558.485, remove and reserve paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(6).

Sec.  558.625  [Amended]

0
8. In Sec.  558.625:
0
a. Remove paragraphs (b)(2) through (24), (b)(26) through (38), (b)(40)
through (53), and (b)(55) through (88); and
0
b. Redesignate paragraphs (b)(25), (b)(39), (b)(54), (b)(89), and
(b)(90) as paragraphs (b)(2) through (6).

0
9. In Sec.  558.630, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:

Sec.  558.630  Tylosin and sulfamethazine.

* * * * *
    (b) Approvals. See sponsor in Sec.  510.600(c) of this chapter for
use as in paragraph (e) of this section.
    (1) No. 000986: 10 or 40 grams per pound each for use as in
paragraph (e)(2)(i) of this section; 5, 10, 20, or 40 grams per pound
each for use as in paragraph (e)(2)(ii) of this section; and 40 grams
per pound each for use as in paragraph (e)(2)(iii) of this section.
    (2) No. 054771: 5, 10, 20, or 40 grams per pound each for use as in
paragraph (e)(2)(ii) of this section.
* * * * *

0
10. In Sec.  558.635, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:

Sec.  558.635  Virginiamycin.

    (a) Approvals. See sponsors in Sec.  510.600(c) of this chapter:
    (1) No. 066104: Type A medicated articles containing 5, 10, 20, 50,
or 227 grams per pound virginiamycin for use as in paragraph (d) of
this section; and 136.2 grams per pound for use as in paragraph (d)(3)
of this section.
    (2) No. 054771: Type A medicated articles containing 10 grams per
pound virginiamycin for use as in paragraphs (d)(1)(iv) and (v) of this
section.
* * * * *

    Dated: April 4, 2014.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2014-08011 Filed 4-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P