                              Penoxsulam (119031)
                     Screening Level Usage Analysis (SLUA)
                              Date: July 21, 2014

What is a Screening Level Usage Analysis (SLUA)?
 Available estimates of pesticide usage data for a particular active ingredient that is used on agricultural crops in the United States.
 Pesticide usage data obtained from various sources.  The data are then merged, averaged, and rounded so that the presented information is not proprietary, business confidential, or trade secret.
What does it contain?
 Pesticide usage data for a single active ingredient only.
 Agricultural use sites (crops) that the pesticide is reported to be used on.
 Available pesticide usage information from U.S. states that produce 80% or more of a crop, in most cases, or less than 80%, in rare cases, depending on the scope of the survey and available resources.
 Annual percent of crop treated (average & maximum) for each agricultural crop.
 Average annual pounds of the pesticide applied for each agricultural crop (i.e., for the states surveyed, not for the entire United States).
What assumptions can I make about the reported data?
 Average pounds of active ingredient applied - Values are calculated by merging pesticide usage data sources together; averaging across all observations, then rounding.  Note:  If the estimated value is less than 500, then that value is labeled <500.  Estimated values between 500 & <1,000,000 are rounded to 1 significant digit.  Estimated values of 1,000,000 or greater are rounded to 2 significant digits.)
 Average percent of crop treated - Values are calculated by merging data sources together; averaging by year, averaging across all years, & rounding to the nearest multiple of 5.  Note:  If the estimated value is less than 2.5, then the value is labeled <2.5.  If the estimated value is less than 1, then the value is labeled <1.
 Maximum percent of crop treated - Value is the single maximum value reported across all data sources, across all years, & rounded up to the nearest multiple of 5.  Note:  If the estimated value is less than 2.5, then the value is labeled <2.5.
What are the data sources used?
 USDA-NASS (United States Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Statistics Service)  -  pesticide usage data from 2004 to 2012.
 Private pesticide market research  -  pesticide usage data from 2004 to 2012.
 California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) Pesticide Use Reporting (PUR) data for 2004 to 2011.
What are the limitations to the data?
 Additional registered uses may exist but are not included because the available surveys do not report usage (e.g., small acreage crops).
 Lack of reported usage data for the pesticide on a crop does not imply zero usage.
 Usage data on a particular site may be noted in data sources, but not quantified.  In these instances, the site would not be reported in the SLUA.
 Non-agricultural use sites (e.g., turf, post-harvest, mosquito control, etc.) are not reported in the SLUA.  A separate request must be made to receive these estimates.
 Some sites show some use, even though they are not on the label.  This usage could be due to various factors, including, but not limited to Section 18 requests, existing stocks of the chemical, data collection errors, and experimental use permits (EUPs).

                                July 21, 2014

     Screening Level Estimates of Agricultural Uses of Penoxsulam (119031)

                             Sorted Alphabetically
                       (Reporting Timeframe: 2004-2012)

                             Percent Crop Treated

                                     Crop
                        Avg. Lbs. A.I. Applied Per Year
                                     Avg.
                                     Max.
                                                                              1
Almonds
       1,000
                                       5
                                      10
                                                                              2
Pecans
        <500
                                     <1
                                    <2.5
                                                                              3
Pistachios
        <500
                                       5
                                      15
                                                                              4
Plums/Prunes
        <500
                                     <1
                                    <2.5
                                                                              5
Rice
       6,000
                                       5
                                      15
                                                                              6
Walnuts
        <500
                                       5
                                      10

All numbers rounded.
                                                                        <500
Less than 500 pounds of active ingredient
                                                                        <2.5
Less than 2.5 percent of crop treated
                                                                          <1
Less than 1 percent of crop treated

SLUA data sources include:
  USDA-NASS (United States Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Statistics Service)
Private Pesticide Market Research

These results reflect amalgamated data developed by the Agency and are releasable to the public.


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 121 (Monday, June 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 41453]
[FR Doc No: 2023-13456]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-97770; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2023-030]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule

June 20, 2023.
    On April 17, 2023, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')
\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend its
fee schedule. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the
Federal Register on May 3, 2023.\3\ The Commission did not receive any
comment letters. On June 1, 2023, the Exchange withdrew the proposed
rule change (CboeEDGX-2023-030).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97393 (April 27,
2023), 88 FR 27940.
    \4\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\4\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-13456 Filed 6-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Date:

From:

To: CWT Record Subject: I August 7,2003 NOWCWTEPA Meeting Notes NORA requested a meeting with EPA to present information related to their request to delete the molybdenum limitations fiom the organics subcategory and related sections of the multiple wastestreams subcategory. The attendees are listed in Attachment A.

Attachment C .

Rich Ellen, Spirit Services ( the old CIPF facility) provided self monitoring effluent data for January and February 2003 ( Attachment D).

to the questions in my July 23,2003 email to Jack Waggener ( the printout is in Attachment E). For some reason some of the pages printed as the mirror image of what was on the screen ( for example see pages 66 to 72). After the meeting, Scott Kuhn gave me a CD which contained the Clean Harbors response An August 8,2003, follow up letter fiom Scott Kuhn is included as Attachment F.