[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 149 (Monday, August 3, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46747-46755]
[FR Doc No: 2020-16830]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 33958; File No. 812-15057]

Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund, et al.

July 28, 2020.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice of application for an order under sections 17(d) and 57(i)
of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') and rule 17d-1
under the Act to permit certain joint transactions otherwise prohibited
by sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act.
    Summary of Application: Applicants request an order to permit
certain business development companies (``BDCs'') and closed-end
management investment companies to co-invest in portfolio companies
with each other and with certain affiliated funds.
    Applicants: Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (``MS BDC''), MS
Capital Partners Adviser Inc. (``MS Adviser''),

NH Credit Partners III Holdings L.P., NH Expansion Credit Fund Holdings
LP, North Haven Credit Partners II L.P., North Haven Credit Partners
III L.P., North Haven Senior Loan Fund (ALMA) Designated Activity
Company, North Haven Senior Loan Fund L.P., North Haven Senior Loan
Fund Offshore L.P., North Haven Senior Loan Fund Unleveraged Offshore
L.P., North Haven Tactical Value Fund (AIV) LP, North Haven Tactical
Value Fund LP, North Haven Unleveraged Senior Loan Fund (Yen) L.P., NH
Senior Loan Fund Offshore Holdings L.P., NH Senior Loan Fund Onshore
Holdings LLC, and DLF CA SPV LLC (``MS BDC Sub'').
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on August 9, 2019, and
amended on December 20, 2019, April 3, 2020 and May 21, 2020.
    Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by emailing the Commission's
Secretary at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and serving applicants with a
copy of the request by email. Hearing requests should be received by
the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on August 24, 2020, and should be
accompanied by proof of service on applicants, in the form of an
affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to rule
0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the nature of the
writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the desirability of a hearing
on the matter, the reason for the request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification
by emailing the Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES: The Commission<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Applicants: Mr.
Mustufa Salehbhai, Executive Director,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean E. Minarick, Senior Counsel, at
(202) 551-6811 or Kaitlin C. Bottock, Branch Chief, at<PHONE_NUMBER>
(Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's website by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Introduction

    1. The applicants request an order of the Commission under sections
17(d) and 57(i) of the Act and rule 17d-1 thereunder (the ``Order'') to
permit, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the
application (the ``Conditions''), a Regulated Fund \1\ and one or more
other Regulated Funds and/or one or more Affiliated Funds \2\ to enter
into Co-Investment Transactions with each other. ``Co-Investment
Transaction'' means any transaction in which a Regulated Fund (or its
Wholly-Owned Investment Sub (as defined below)) participated together
with one or more Affiliated Funds and/or one or more other Regulated
Funds (or its Wholly-Owned Investment Sub) in reliance on the Order.
``Potential Co-Investment Transaction'' means any investment
opportunity in which a Regulated Fund (or its Wholly-Owned Investment
Sub) could not participate together with one or more Affiliated Funds
and/or one or more other Regulated Funds (or its Wholly-Owned
Investment Sub) without obtaining and relying on the Order.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ ``Regulated Funds'' means MS BDC and the Future Regulated
Funds. ``Future Regulated Fund'' means a closed-end management
investment company (a) that is registered under the Act or has
elected to be regulated as a BDC, (b) whose investment adviser (and
sub-adviser, if any) is an Adviser, and (c) that intends to
participate in the Co-investment Program.
    ``Adviser'' means the MS Adviser, together with any future
investment adviser that (a) is controlled by the MS Adviser, (b) (i)
is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers
Act of 1940 (``Advisers Act'') or (ii) is a relying adviser of an
investment adviser that is registered under the Advisers Act, and
that is controlled by the MS Adviser, and (c) is not a Regulated
Fund or a subsidiary of a Regulated Fund.
    \2\ ``Affiliated Fund'' means any entity (a) whose investment
adviser (and sub-adviser(s), if any) is an Adviser, (b) that either
(i) would be an investment company but for section 3(c)(1) or
3(c)(7) of the Act or (ii) relies on rule 3a-7 under the Act, and
(c) that intends to participate in the Co-Investment Program.
    \3\ All existing entities that currently intend to rely on the
Order have been named as applicants and any existing or future
entities that may rely on the Order in the future will comply with
its terms and Conditions set forth in the application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Applicants

    2. MS BDC is a non-diversified, closed-end management investment
company incorporated in Delaware that will elect to be regulated as a
BDC under the Act.\4\ The Board \5\ of MS BDC currently consist of six
directors, four of whom are Independent Directors.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Section 2(a)(48) defines a BDC to be any closed-end
investment company that operates for the purpose of making
investments in securities described in section 55(a)(1) through
55(a)(3) and makes available significant managerial assistance with
respect to the issuers of such securities.
    \5\ ``Board'' means the board of directors (or the equivalent)
of a Regulated Fund.
    \6\ ``Independent Director'' means a member of the Board of any
relevant entity who is not an ``interested person'' as defined in
section 2(a)(19) of the Act. No Independent Director of a Regulated
Fund (including any non-interested member of an Independent Party)
will have a financial interest in any Co-Investment Transaction,
other than indirectly through share ownership in one of the
Regulated Funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. MS Adviser, a corporation under the laws of the state of
Delaware, is registered with the Commission as an investment adviser
under the Advisers Act. MS Adviser is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Morgan Stanley, a global financial services firm that through its
subsidiaries and affiliates, advises, originates, trades, manages and
distributes capital for governments, institutions and individuals.
Morgan Stanley is a bank holding company structured as a Delaware
corporation that controls the MS Adviser.
    4. MS BDC Sub is a wholly-owned subsidiary of MS BDC formed
specifically for the purpose of procuring financing or otherwise
holding investments.
    5. Applicants state that a Regulated Fund may, from time to time,
form one or more Wholly-Owned Investment Subs.\7\ Such a subsidiary may
be prohibited from investing in a Co-Investment Transaction with a
Regulated Fund (other than its parent) or any Affiliated Fund because
it would be a company controlled by its parent Regulated Fund for
purposes of section 57(a)(4) and rule 17d-1. Applicants request that
each Wholly-Owned Investment Sub be permitted to participate in Co-
Investment Transactions in lieu of the Regulated Fund that owns it and
that the Wholly-Owned Investment Sub's participation in any such
transaction be treated, for purposes of the Order, as though the parent
Regulated Fund were participating directly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ ``Wholly-Owned Investment Sub'' means the MS BDC Sub or an
entity (i) that is wholly-owned by a Regulated Fund (with such
Regulated Fund at all times holding, beneficially and of record,
100% or more of the voting and economic interests); (ii) whose sole
business purpose is to hold one or more investments on behalf of
such Regulated Fund (and in the case of an SBIC Subsidiary, maintain
a license under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (``SBA
Act'') and issue debentures guaranteed by the Small Business
Administration (``SBA'')); (iii) with respect to which such
Regulated Fund's Board has the sole authority to make all
determinations with respect to the entity's participation under the
Conditions; and (iv) that (a) would be an investment company but for
section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Act, or (b) that relies on Rule
3a-7 under the Act. ``SBIC Subsidiary'' means a Wholly-Owned
Investment Sub that is licensed by the SBA to operate under the SBA
Act as a small business investment company.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Applicants' Representations

A. Allocation Process

    6. Applicants represent that the Adviser will establish processes
for allocating initial investment

opportunities, opportunities for subsequent investments in an issuer
and dispositions of securities holdings reasonably designed to treat
all clients fairly and equitably. Further, applicants represent that
these processes will be extended and modified in a manner reasonably
designed to ensure that the additional transactions permitted under the
Order will both (i) be fair and equitable to the Regulated Funds and
the Affiliated Funds and (ii) comply with the Conditions.
    7. Opportunities for Potential Co-Investment Transactions may arise
when investment advisory personnel of an Adviser becomes aware of
investment opportunities that may be appropriate for one or more
Regulated Funds and/or one or more Affiliated Funds. If the requested
Order is granted, the Adviser will establish, maintain and implement
policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that, when such
opportunities arise, the Advisers to the relevant Regulated Funds are
promptly notified and receive the same information about the
opportunity as any other Advisers considering the opportunity for their
clients. In particular, consistent with Condition 1, if a Potential Co-
Investment Transaction falls within the then-current Objectives and
Strategies \8\ and any Board-Established Criteria \9\ of a Regulated
Fund, the policies and procedures will require that the relevant
portfolio managers, as well as the teams and committees of portfolio
managers, analysts and senior management (``Investment Teams'' and
``Investment Committees'') responsible for that Regulated Fund receive
sufficient information to allow the Regulated Fund's Adviser to make
its independent determination and recommendations under the Conditions.
The Adviser to each applicable Regulated Fund, working through the
applicable portfolio manager, or in conjunction with any applicable
Investment Team or Investment Committee, will then make an independent
determination of the appropriateness of the investment for the
Regulated Fund in light of the Regulated Fund's then-current
circumstances. If the Adviser to a Regulated Fund deems the Regulated
Fund's participation in such Potential Co-Investment Transaction to be
appropriate, then it will, working through the applicable portfolio
manager, or in conjunction with any applicable Investment Team or
Investment Committee, formulate a recommendation regarding the proposed
order amount for the Regulated Fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ ``Objectives and Strategies'' means (i) with respect to any
Regulated Fund, its investment objectives and strategies, as
described in its most current filings with the Commission under the
Securities Act of 1933 (``Securities Act'') or under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the Act, and its most current report to
stockholders.
    \9\ ``Board-Established Criteria'' means criteria that the Board
of a Regulated Fund may establish from time to time to describe the
characteristics of Potential Co-Investment Transactions regarding
which the Adviser to the Regulated Fund should be notified under
Condition 1. The Board-Established Criteria will be consistent with
the Regulated Fund's Objectives and Strategies. If no Board-
Established Criteria are in effect, then the Regulated Fund's
Adviser will be notified of all Potential Co-Investment Transactions
that fall within the Regulated Fund's then-current Objectives and
Strategies. Board-Established Criteria will be objective and
testable, meaning that they will be based on observable information,
such as industry/sector of the issuer, minimum EBITDA of the issuer,
asset class of the investment opportunity or required commitment
size, and not on characteristics that involve a discretionary
assessment. The Adviser to the Regulated Fund may from time to time
recommend criteria for the Board's consideration, but Board-
Established Criteria will only become effective if approved by a
majority of the Independent Directors. The Independent Directors of
a Regulated Fund may at any time rescind, suspend or qualify their
approval of any Board-Established Criteria, though applicants
anticipate that, under normal circumstances, the Board would not
modify these criteria more often than quarterly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    8. Applicants state that, for each Regulated Fund and Affiliated
Fund whose Adviser recommends participating in a Potential Co-
Investment Transaction, the Adviser, working through the applicable
portfolio manager, or in conjunction with any applicable Investment
Team or Investment Committee, will approve an investment amount. Prior
to the External Submission (as defined below), each proposed order
amount may be reviewed and adjusted, in accordance with the applicable
Advisers' written allocation policies and procedures, by the Morgan
Stanley Private Credit Allocation Committee, on which senior management
and the Adviser's chief compliance officer participate.\10\ The order
of a Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund resulting from this process is
referred to as its ``Internal Order.'' The Internal Order will be
submitted for approval by the Required Majority of any participating
Regulated Funds in accordance with the Conditions.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The reason for any such adjustment to a proposed order
amount will be documented in writing and preserved in the records of
each Adviser.
    \11\ ``Required Majority'' means a required majority, as defined
in section 57(o) of the Act. In the case of a Regulated Fund that is
a registered closed-end fund, the Board members that make up the
Required Majority will be determined as if the Regulated Fund were a
BDC subject to section 57(o).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    9. If the aggregate Internal Orders for a Potential Co-Investment
Transaction do not exceed the size of the investment opportunity
immediately prior to the submission of the orders to the underwriter,
broker, dealer or issuer, as applicable (the ``External Submission''),
then each Internal Order will be fulfilled as placed. If, on the other
hand, the aggregate Internal Orders for a Potential Co-Investment
Transaction exceed the size of the investment opportunity immediately
prior to the External Submission, then the allocation of the
opportunity will be made pro rata on the basis of the size of the
Internal Orders.\12\ If, subsequent to such External Submission, the
size of the opportunity is increased or decreased, or if the terms of
such opportunity, or the facts and circumstances applicable to the
Regulated Funds' or the Affiliated Funds' consideration of the
opportunity, change, the participants will be permitted to submit
revised Internal Orders in accordance with written allocation policies
and procedures that the Advisers will establish, implement and
maintain.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The Advisers will maintain records of all proposed order
amounts, Internal Orders and External Submissions in conjunction
with Potential Co-Investment Transactions. Each applicable Adviser
will provide the Eligible Directors with information concerning the
Affiliated Funds' and Regulated Funds' order sizes to assist the
Eligible Directors with their review of the applicable Regulated
Fund's investments for compliance with the Conditions.
    ``Eligible Directors'' means, with respect to a Regulated Fund
and a Potential Co-Investment Transaction, the members of the
Regulated Fund's Board eligible to vote on that Potential Co-
Investment Transaction under section 57(o) of the Act (treating any
registered investment company or series thereof as a BDC for this
purpose).
    \13\ The Board of the Regulated Fund will then either approve or
disapprove of the investment opportunity in accordance with
Condition 2, 6, 7, 8 or 9, as applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Follow-On Investments

    10. Applicants state that from time to time the Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds may have opportunities to make Follow-On Investments
\14\ in an issuer in which a Regulated Fund and one or more other
Regulated Funds and/or Affiliated Funds previously have invested.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ ``Follow-On Investment'' means an additional investment in
the same issuer, including, but not limited to, through the exercise
of warrants, conversion privileges or other rights to purchase
securities of the issuer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    11. Applicants propose that Follow-On Investments would be divided
into two categories depending on whether the prior investment was a Co-
Investment Transaction or a Pre-Boarding Investment.\15\ If the
Regulated

Funds and Affiliated Funds had previously participated in a Co-
Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer, then the terms and
approval of the Follow-On Investment would be subject to the Standard
Review Follow-Ons described in Condition 8. If the Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds have not previously participated in a Co-Investment
Transaction with respect to the issuer but hold a Pre-Boarding
Investment, then the terms and approval of the Follow-On Investment
would be subject to the Enhanced-Review Follow-Ons described in
Condition 9. All Enhanced Review Follow-Ons require the approval of the
Required Majority. For a given issuer, the participating Regulated
Funds and Affiliated Funds would need to comply with the requirements
of Enhanced-Review Follow-Ons only for the first Co-Investment
Transaction. Subsequent Co-Investment Transactions with respect to the
issuer would be governed by the requirements of Standard Review Follow-
Ons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ ``Pre-Boarding Investments'' are investments in an issuer
held by a Regulated Fund as well as one or more Affiliated Funds
and/or one or more other Regulated Funds that: (a) Were acquired
prior to participating in any Co-Investment Transaction; (b) were
acquired in transactions in which the only term negotiated by or on
behalf of such funds was price; and (c) were acquired either (i) in
reliance on one of the JT No-Action Letters (defined below); or (ii)
in transactions occurring at least 90 days apart and without
coordination between the Regulated Fund and any Affiliated Fund or
other Regulated Fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    12. A Regulated Fund would be permitted to invest in Standard
Review Follow-Ons either with the approval of the Required Majority
under Condition 8(c) or without Board approval under Condition 8(b) if
it is (i) a Pro Rata Follow-On Investment \16\ or (ii) a Non-Negotiated
Follow-On Investment.\17\ Applicants believe that these Pro Rata and
Non-Negotiated Follow-On Investments do not present a significant
opportunity for overreaching on the part of any Adviser and thus do not
warrant the time or the attention of the Board. Pro Rata Follow-On
Investments and Non-Negotiated Follow-On Investments remain subject to
the Board's periodic review in accordance with Condition 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ A ``Pro Rata Follow-On Investment'' is a Follow-On
Investment (i) in which the participation of each Affiliated Fund
and each Regulated Fund is proportionate to its outstanding
investments in the issuer or security, as appropriate, immediately
preceding the Follow-On Investment, and (ii) in the case of a
Regulated Fund, a majority of the Board has approved the Regulated
Fund's participation in the pro rata Follow-On Investments as being
in the best interests of the Regulated Fund. The Regulated Fund's
Board may refuse to approve, or at any time rescind, suspend or
qualify, its approval of Pro Rata Follow-On Investments, in which
case all subsequent Follow-On Investments will be submitted to the
Regulated Fund's Eligible Directors in accordance with Condition
8(c).
    \17\ A ``Non-Negotiated Follow-On Investment'' is a Follow-On
Investment in which a Regulated Fund participates together with one
or more Affiliated Funds and/or one or more other Regulated Funds
(i) in which the only term negotiated by or on behalf of the funds
is price and (ii) with respect to which, if the transaction were
considered on its own, the funds would be entitled to rely on one of
the JT No-Action Letters.
    ``JT No-Action Letters'' means SMC Capital, Inc., SEC No-Action
Letter (pub. avail. Sept. 5, 1995) and Massachusetts Mutual Life
Insurance Company, SEC No-Action Letter (pub. avail. June 7, 2000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Dispositions

    13. Applicants propose that Dispositions \18\ would be divided into
two categories. If the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds holding
investments in the issuer had previously participated in a Co-
Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer, then the terms and
approval of the Disposition would be subject to the Standard Review
Dispositions described in Condition 6. If the Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds have not previously participated in a Co-Investment
Transaction with respect to the issuer but hold a Pre-Boarding
Investment, then the terms and approval of the Disposition would be
subject to the Enhanced Review Dispositions described in Condition 7.
Subsequent Dispositions with respect to the same issuer would be
governed by Condition 6 under the Standard Review Dispositions.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ ``Disposition'' means the sale, exchange or other
disposition of an interest in a security of an issuer.
    \19\ However, with respect to an issuer, if a Regulated Fund's
first Co-Investment Transaction is an Enhanced Review Disposition,
and the Regulated Fund does not dispose of its entire position in
the Enhanced Review Disposition, then before such Regulated Fund may
complete its first Standard Review Follow-On in such issuer, the
Eligible Directors must review the proposed Follow-On Investment not
only on a stand-alone basis but also in relation to the total
economic exposure in such issuer (i.e., in combination with the
portion of the Pre-Boarding Investment not disposed of in the
Enhanced Review Disposition), and the other terms of the
investments. This additional review would be required because such
findings would not have been required in connection with the prior
Enhanced Review Disposition, but they would have been required had
the first Co-Investment Transaction been an Enhanced Review Follow-
On.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    14. A Regulated Fund may participate in a Standard Review
Disposition either with the approval of the Required Majority under
Condition 6(d) or without Board approval under Condition 6(c) if (i)
the Disposition is a Pro Rata Disposition \20\ or (ii) the securities
are Tradable Securities \21\ and the Disposition meets the other
requirements of Condition 6(c)(ii). Pro Rata Dispositions and
Dispositions of a Tradable Security remain subject to the Board's
periodic review in accordance with Condition 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ A ``Pro Rata Disposition'' is a Disposition (i) in which
the participation of each Affiliated Fund and each Regulated Fund is
proportionate to its outstanding investment in the security subject
to Disposition immediately preceding the Disposition; and (ii) in
the case of a Regulated Fund, a majority of the Board has approved
the Regulated Fund's participation in pro rata Dispositions as being
in the best interests of the Regulated Fund. The Regulated Fund's
Board may refuse to approve, or at any time rescind, suspend or
qualify, its approval of Pro Rata Dispositions, in which case all
subsequent Dispositions will be submitted to the Regulated Fund's
Eligible Directors.
    \21\ ``Tradable Security'' means a security that meets the
following criteria at the time of Disposition: (i) It trades on a
national securities exchange or designated offshore securities
market as defined in rule 902(b) under the Securities Act; (ii) it
is not subject to restrictive agreements with the issuer or other
security holders; and (iii) it trades with sufficient volume and
liquidity (findings as to which are documented by the Advisers to
any Regulated Funds holding investments in the issuer and retained
for the life of the Regulated Fund) to allow each Regulated Fund to
dispose of its entire position remaining after the proposed
Disposition within a short period of time not exceeding 30 days at
approximately the value (as defined by section 2(a)(41) of the Act)
at which the Regulated Fund has valued the investment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. Delayed Settlement

    15. Applicants represent that under the terms and Conditions of the
application, all Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds participating in
a Co-Investment Transaction will invest at the same time, for the same
price and with the same terms, conditions, class, registration rights
and any other rights, so that none of them receives terms more
favorable than any other. However, the settlement date for an
Affiliated Fund in a Co-Investment Transaction may occur up to ten
business days after the settlement date for the Regulated Fund, and
vice versa. Nevertheless, in all cases, (i) the date on which the
commitments of the Affiliated Funds and Regulated Funds are made will
be the same even where the settlement date is not and (ii) the earliest
settlement date and the latest settlement date of any Affiliated Fund
or Regulated Fund participating in the transaction will occur within
ten business days of each other.

E. Holders

    16. Under Condition 15, if an Adviser, its principals, or any
person controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the
Adviser or its principals, and the Affiliated Funds (collectively, the
``Holders'') own in the aggregate more than 25 percent of the
outstanding voting shares of a Regulated Fund (the ``Shares''), then
the Holders will vote such Shares as directed by an independent third
party when voting on matters specified in the Condition. Applicants
believe that this Condition will ensure that the Independent Directors
will act independently in evaluating Co-Investment Transactions,

because the ability of the Adviser or its principals to influence the
Independent Directors by a suggestion, explicit or implied, that the
Independent Directors can be removed will be limited significantly. The
Independent Directors shall evaluate and approve any independent party,
taking into account its qualifications, reputation for independence,
cost to the shareholders, and other factors that they deem relevant.

Applicants' Legal Analysis

    1. Section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act prohibit
participation by a registered investment company and an affiliated
person in any ``joint enterprise or other joint arrangement or profit-
sharing plan,'' as defined in the rule, without prior approval by the
Commission by order upon application. Section 17(d) of the Act and rule
17d-1 under the Act are applicable to Regulated Funds that are
registered closed-end investment companies.
    2. Similarly, with regard to BDCs, section 57(a)(4) of the Act
generally prohibits certain persons specified in section 57(b) from
participating in joint transactions with the BDC or a company
controlled by the BDC in contravention of rules as prescribed by the
Commission. Section 57(i) of the Act provides that, until the
Commission prescribes rules under section 57(a)(4), the Commission's
rules under section 17(d) of the Act applicable to registered closed-
end investment companies will be deemed to apply to transactions
subject to section 57(a)(4). Because the Commission has not adopted any
rules under section 57(a)(4), rule 17d-1 also applies to joint
transactions with Regulated Funds that are BDCs.
    3. Co-Investment Transactions are prohibited by either or both of
rule 17d-1 and section 57(a)(4) without a prior exemptive order of the
Commission to the extent that the Affiliated Funds and the Regulated
Funds participating in such transactions fall within the category of
persons described by rule 17d-1 and/or section 57(b), as modified by
rule 57b-1 thereunder, as applicable, vis-[agrave]-vis each
participating Regulated Fund. Because an Adviser will be the investment
adviser (and sub-adviser, if any) to each Affiliated Fund and Regulated
Fund, the Advisers, a Regulated Fund and the Affiliated Funds may be
deemed to be a person related to each other Regulated Fund in a manner
described by section 57(b) (or section 17(d) in the case of Regulated
Funds that are registered under the Act). Thus, each Regulated Fund and
each Affiliated Fund could be deemed to be a person related to a
Regulated Fund, in a manner described by section 57(b) and related to
the other Regulated Funds in a manner described by rule 17d-1; and
therefore the prohibitions of rule 17d-1 and section 57(a)(4) (or
Section 17(d) in the case of Regulated Funds that are registered under
the Act) would apply respectively to prohibit the Affiliated Funds from
participating in Co-Investment Transactions with the Regulated Funds.
Further, because the Wholly-Owned Investment Subs are controlled by the
Regulated Funds, the Wholly-Owned Investment Subs are subject to
section 57(a)(4) (or section 17(d) in the case of Wholly-Owned
Investment Subs controlled by Regulated Funds that are registered under
the Act) and thus also subject to the provisions of rule 17d-1.
    4. In passing upon applications under rule 17d-1, the Commission
considers whether the company's participation in the joint transaction
is consistent with the provisions, policies, and purposes of the Act
and the extent to which such participation is on a basis different from
or less advantageous than that of other participants.
    5. Applicants state that in the absence of the requested relief, in
many circumstances the Regulated Funds would be limited in their
ability to participate in attractive and appropriate investment
opportunities. Applicants state that, as required by rule 17d-1(b), the
Conditions ensure that the terms on which Co-Investment Transactions
may be made will be consistent with the participation of the Regulated
Funds being on a basis that it is neither different from nor less
advantageous than other participants, thus protecting the equity
holders of any participant from being disadvantaged. Applicants further
state that the Conditions ensure that all Co-Investment Transactions
are reasonable and fair to the Regulated Funds and their shareholders
and do not involve overreaching by any person concerned, including the
Advisers. Applicants state that the Regulated Funds' participation in
the Co-Investment Transactions in accordance with the Conditions will
be consistent with the provisions, policies, and purposes of the Act
and would be done in a manner that is not different from, or less
advantageous than, that of other participants.

Applicants' Conditions

    Applicants agree that the Order will be subject to the following
Conditions:
    1. Identification and Referral of Potential Co-Investment
Transactions.
    (a) The Advisers will establish, maintain and implement policies
and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that each Adviser is
promptly notified of all Potential Co-Investment Transactions that fall
within the then-current Objectives and Strategies and Board-Established
Criteria of any Regulated Fund the Adviser manages.
    (b) When an Adviser to a Regulated Fund is notified of a Potential
Co-Investment Transaction under Condition 1(a), the Adviser will make
an independent determination of the appropriateness of the investment
for the Regulated Fund in light of the Regulated Fund's then-current
circumstances.
    2. Board Approvals of Co-Investment Transactions.
    (a) If the Adviser deems a Regulated Fund's participation in any
Potential Co-Investment Transaction to be appropriate for the Regulated
Fund, it will then determine an appropriate level of investment for the
Regulated Fund.
    (b) If the aggregate amount recommended by the Advisers to be
invested in the Potential Co-Investment Transaction by the
participating Regulated Funds and any participating Affiliated Funds,
collectively, exceeds the amount of the investment opportunity, the
investment opportunity will be allocated among them pro rata based on
the size of the Internal Orders, as described in section III.A.1.b. of
the application. Each Adviser to a participating Regulated Fund will
promptly notify and provide the Eligible Directors with information
concerning the Affiliated Funds' and Regulated Funds' order sizes to
assist the Eligible Directors with their review of the applicable
Regulated Fund's investments for compliance with these Conditions.
    (c) After making the determinations required in Condition 1(b)
above, each Adviser to a participating Regulated Fund will distribute
written information concerning the Potential Co-Investment Transaction
(including the amount proposed to be invested by each participating
Regulated Fund and each participating Affiliated Fund) to the Eligible
Directors of its participating Regulated Fund(s) for their
consideration. A Regulated Fund will enter into a Co-Investment
Transaction with one or more other Regulated Funds or Affiliated Funds
only if, prior to the Regulated Fund's participation in the Potential
Co-Investment Transaction, a Required Majority concludes that:
    (i) The terms of the transaction, including the consideration to be
paid, are reasonable and fair to the Regulated Fund and its equity
holders and do not involve overreaching in respect of the

Regulated Fund or its equity holders on the part of any person
concerned;
    (ii) the transaction is consistent with:
    (A) The interests of the Regulated Fund's equity holders; and
    (B) the Regulated Fund's then-current Objectives and Strategies;
    (iii) the investment by any other Regulated Fund(s) or Affiliated
Fund(s) would not disadvantage the Regulated Fund, and participation by
the Regulated Fund would not be on a basis different from, or less
advantageous than, that of any other Regulated Fund(s) or Affiliated
Fund(s) participating in the transaction; provided that the Required
Majority shall not be prohibited from reaching the conclusions required
by this Condition 2(c)(iii) if:
    (A) The settlement date for another Regulated Fund or an Affiliated
Fund in a Co-Investment Transaction is later than the settlement date
for the Regulated Fund by no more than ten business days or earlier
than the settlement date for the Regulated Fund by no more than ten
business days, in either case, so long as: (x) The date on which the
commitments of the Affiliated Funds and Regulated Funds are made is the
same; and (y) the earliest settlement date and the latest settlement
date of any Affiliated Fund or Regulated Fund participating in the
transaction will occur within ten business days of each other; or
    (B) any other Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund, but not the
Regulated Fund itself, gains the right to nominate a director for
election to a portfolio company's board of directors, the right to have
a board observer or any similar right to participate in the governance
or management of the portfolio company so long as: (x) The Eligible
Directors will have the right to ratify the selection of such director
or board observer, if any; (y) the Adviser agrees to, and does, provide
periodic reports to the Regulated Fund's Board with respect to the
actions of such director or the information received by such board
observer or obtained through the exercise of any similar right to
participate in the governance or management of the portfolio company;
and (z) any fees or other compensation that any other Regulated Fund or
Affiliated Fund or any affiliated person of any other Regulated Fund or
Affiliated Fund receives in connection with the right of one or more
Regulated Funds or Affiliated Funds to nominate a director or appoint a
board observer or otherwise to participate in the governance or
management of the portfolio company will be shared proportionately
among any participating Affiliated Funds (who may, in turn, share their
portion with their affiliated persons) and any participating Regulated
Fund(s) in accordance with the amount of each such party's investment;
and
    (iv) the proposed investment by the Regulated Fund will not involve
compensation, remuneration or a direct or indirect \22\ financial
benefit to the Advisers, any other Regulated Funds, the Affiliated
Funds or any affiliated person of any of them (other than the parties
to the Co-Investment Transaction), except (A) to the extent permitted
by Condition 14, (B) to the extent permitted by section 17(e) or 57(k),
as applicable, (C) indirectly, as a result of an interest in the
securities issued by one of the parties to the Co-Investment
Transaction, or (D) in the case of fees or other compensation described
in Condition 2(c)(iii)(B)(z).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ For example, procuring the Regulated Fund's investment in a
Potential Co-Investment Transaction to permit an affiliate to
complete or obtain better terms in a separate transaction would
constitute an indirect financial benefit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. Right to Decline. Each Regulated Fund has the right to decline
to participate in any Potential Co-Investment Transaction or to invest
less than the amount proposed.
    4. General Limitation. Except for Follow-On Investments made in
accordance with Conditions 8 and 9 below,\23\ a Regulated Fund will not
invest in reliance on the Order in any issuer in which a Related Party
has an investment.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ This exception applies only to Follow-On Investments by a
Regulated Fund in issuers in which that Regulated Fund already holds
investments.
    \24\ ``Related Party'' means (i) any Close Affiliate and (ii) in
respect of matters as to which any Adviser has knowledge, any Remote
Affiliate.
    ``Close Affiliate'' means the Advisers, the Regulated Funds, the
Affiliated Funds and any other person described in section 57(b)
(after giving effect to rule 57b-1) in respect of any Regulated Fund
(treating any registered investment company or series thereof as a
BDC for this purpose) except for limited partners included solely by
reason of the reference in section 57(b) to section 2(a)(3)(D).
    ``Remote Affiliate'' means any person described in section 57(e)
in respect of any Regulated Fund (treating any registered investment
company or series thereof as a BDC for this purpose) and any limited
partner holding 5% or more of the relevant limited partner interests
that would be a Close Affiliate but for the exclusion in that
definition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    5. Same Terms and Conditions. A Regulated Fund will not participate
in any Potential Co-Investment Transaction unless (i) the terms,
conditions, price, class of securities to be purchased, date on which
the commitment is entered into and registration rights (if any) will be
the same for each participating Regulated Fund and Affiliated Fund and
(ii) the earliest settlement date and the latest settlement date of any
participating Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund will occur as close in
time as practicable and in no event more than ten business days apart.
The grant to one or more Regulated Funds or Affiliated Funds, but not
the respective Regulated Fund, of the right to nominate a director for
election to a portfolio company's board of directors, the right to have
an observer on the board of directors or similar rights to participate
in the governance or management of the portfolio company will not be
interpreted so as to violate this Condition 5, if Condition
2(c)(iii)(B) is met.
    6. Standard Review Dispositions.
    (a) General. If any Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund elects to
sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of an interest in a security and
one or more Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds have previously
participated in a Co-Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer,
then:
    (i) The Adviser to such Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund, as
applicable, will notify each Regulated Fund that holds an investment in
the issuer of the proposed Disposition at the earliest practical time;
and
    (ii) the Adviser to each Regulated Fund that holds an investment in
the issuer will formulate a recommendation as to participation by such
Regulated Fund in the Disposition.
    (b) Same Terms and Conditions. Each Regulated Fund will have the
right to participate in such Disposition on a proportionate basis, at
the same price and on the same terms and conditions as those applicable
to the Affiliated Funds and any other Regulated Funds.
    (c) No Board Approval Required. A Regulated Fund may participate in
such a Disposition without obtaining prior approval of the Required
Majority if:
    (i) (A) The participation of each Regulated Fund and Affiliated
Fund in such Disposition is proportionate to its then-current holding
of the security (or securities) of the issuer that is (or are) the
subject of the Disposition; \25\ (B) the Board of the Regulated Fund
has approved as being in the best interests of the Regulated Fund the
ability to participate in such Dispositions on a pro rata basis (as
described in greater detail in the application); and (C) the Board of
the Regulated Fund is provided on a quarterly basis with a list of all

Dispositions made in accordance with this Condition; or
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ In the case of any Disposition, proportionality will be
measured by each participating Regulated Fund's and Affiliated
Fund's outstanding investment in the security in question
immediately preceding the Disposition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (ii) each security is a Tradable Security and (A) the Disposition
is not to the issuer or any affiliated person of the issuer; and (B)
the security is sold for cash in a transaction in which the only term
negotiated by or on behalf of the participating Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds is price.
    (d) Standard Board Approval. In all other cases, the Adviser will
provide its written recommendation as to the Regulated Fund's
participation to the Eligible Directors and the Regulated Fund will
participate in such Disposition solely to the extent that a Required
Majority determines that it is in the Regulated Fund's best interests.
    7. Enhanced Review Dispositions.
    (a) General. If any Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund elects to
sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of a Pre-Boarding Investment in a
Potential Co-Investment Transaction and the Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds have not previously participated in a Co-Investment
Transaction with respect to the issuer:
    (i) The Adviser to such Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund, as
applicable, will notify each Regulated Fund that holds an investment in
the issuer of the proposed Disposition at the earliest practical time;
    (ii) the Adviser to each Regulated Fund that holds an investment in
the issuer will formulate a recommendation as to participation by such
Regulated Fund in the Disposition; and
    (iii) the Advisers will provide to the Board of each Regulated Fund
that holds an investment in the issuer all information relating to the
existing investments in the issuer of the Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds, including the terms of such investments and how they
were made, that is necessary for the Required Majority to make the
findings required by this Condition.
    (b) Enhanced Board Approval. The Adviser will provide its written
recommendation as to the Regulated Fund's participation to the Eligible
Directors, and the Regulated Fund will participate in such Disposition
solely to the extent that a Required Majority determines that:
    (i) The Disposition complies with Condition 2(c)(i), (ii),
(iii)(A), and (iv); and
    (ii) the making and holding of the Pre-Boarding Investments were
not prohibited by section 57 or rule 17d-1, as applicable, and records
the basis for the finding in the Board minutes.
    (c) Additional Requirements: The Disposition may only be completed
in reliance on the Order if:
    (i) Same Terms and Conditions. Each Regulated Fund has the right to
participate in such Disposition on a proportionate basis, at the same
price and on the same terms and Conditions as those applicable to the
Affiliated Funds and any other Regulated Funds;
    (ii) Original Investments. All of the Affiliated Funds' and
Regulated Funds' investments in the issuer are Pre-Boarding
Investments;
    (iii) Advice of counsel. Independent counsel to the Board advises
that the making and holding of the investments in the Pre-Boarding
Investments were not prohibited by section 57 (as modified by rule 57b-
1) or rule 17d-1, as applicable;
    (iv) Multiple Classes of Securities. All Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds that hold Pre-Boarding Investments in the issuer
immediately before the time of completion of the Co-Investment
Transaction hold the same security or securities of the issuer. For the
purpose of determining whether the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds
hold the same security or securities, they may disregard any security
held by some but not all of them if, prior to relying on the Order, the
Required Majority is presented with all information necessary to make a
finding, and finds, that: (x) Any Regulated Fund's or Affiliated Fund's
holding of a different class of securities (including for this purpose
a security with a different maturity date) is immaterial \26\ in
amount, including immaterial relative to the size of the issuer; and
(y) the Board records the basis for any such finding in its minutes. In
addition, securities that differ only in respect of issuance date,
currency, or denominations may be treated as the same security; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ In determining whether a holding is ``immaterial'' for
purposes of the Order, the Required Majority will consider whether
the nature and extent of the interest in the transaction or
arrangement is sufficiently small that a reasonable person would not
believe that the interest affected the determination of whether to
enter into the transaction or arrangement or the terms of the
transaction or arrangement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (v) No control. The Affiliated Funds, the other Regulated Funds and
their affiliated persons (within the meaning of section 2(a)(3)(C) of
the Act), individually or in the aggregate, do not control the issuer
of the securities (within the meaning of section 2(a)(9) of the Act).
    8. Standard Review Follow-Ons.
    (a) General. If any Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund desires to
make a Follow-On Investment in an issuer and the Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds holding investments in the issuer previously
participated in a Co-Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer:
    (i) The Adviser to each such Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund, as
applicable, will notify each Regulated Fund that holds securities of
the portfolio company of the proposed transaction at the earliest
practical time; and
    (ii) the Adviser to each Regulated Fund that holds an investment in
the issuer will formulate a recommendation as to the proposed
participation, including the amount of the proposed investment, by such
Regulated Fund.
    (b) No Board Approval Required. A Regulated Fund may participate in
the Follow-On Investment without obtaining prior approval of the
Required Majority if:
    (i) (A) The proposed participation of each Regulated Fund and each
Affiliated Fund in such investment is proportionate to its outstanding
investments in the issuer or the security at issue, as appropriate,\27\
immediately preceding the Follow-On Investment; and (B) the Board of
the Regulated Fund has approved as being in the best interests of the
Regulated Fund the ability to participate in Follow-On Investments on a
pro rata basis (as described in greater detail in the application); or
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ To the extent that a Follow-On Investment opportunity is in
a security or arises in respect of a security held by the
participating Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds, proportionality
will be measured by each participating Regulated Fund's and
Affiliated Fund's outstanding investment in the security in question
immediately preceding the Follow-On Investment using the most recent
available valuation thereof. To the extent that a Follow-On
Investment opportunity relates to an opportunity to invest in a
security that is not in respect of any security held by any of the
participating Regulated Funds or Affiliated Funds, proportionality
will be measured by each participating Regulated Fund's and
Affiliated Fund's outstanding investment in the issuer immediately
preceding the Follow-On Investment using the most recent available
valuation thereof.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (ii) it is a Non-Negotiated Follow-On Investment.
    (c) Standard Board Approval. In all other cases, the Adviser will
provide its written recommendation as to the Regulated Fund's
participation to the Eligible Directors and the Regulated Fund will
participate in such Follow-On Investment solely to the extent that a
Required Majority makes the determinations set forth in Condition 2(c).
If the only previous Co-Investment Transaction with respect to the
issuer was an Enhanced Review Disposition, the Eligible Directors must
complete this review of the proposed Follow-On

Investment both on a stand-alone basis and together with the Pre-
Boarding Investments in relation to the total economic exposure and
other terms of the investment.
    (d) Allocation. If, with respect to any such Follow-On Investment:
    (i) The amount of the opportunity proposed to be made available to
any Regulated Fund is not based on the Regulated Funds' and the
Affiliated Funds' outstanding investments in the issuer or the security
at issue, as appropriate, immediately preceding the Follow-On
Investment; and
    (ii) the aggregate amount recommended by the Advisers to be
invested in the Follow-On Investment by the participating Regulated
Funds and any participating Affiliated Funds, collectively, exceeds the
amount of the investment opportunity, then the Follow-On Investment
opportunity will be allocated among them pro rata based on the size of
the Internal Orders, as described in section III.A.1.b. of the
application.
    (e) Other Conditions. The acquisition of Follow-On Investments as
permitted by this Condition will be considered a Co-Investment
Transaction for all purposes and subject to the other Conditions set
forth in the application.
    9. Enhanced Review Follow-Ons.
    (a) General. If any Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund desires to
make a Follow-On Investment in an issuer that is a Potential Co-
Investment Transaction and the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds
holding investments in the issuer have not previously participated in a
Co-Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer:
    (i) The Adviser to each such Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund, as
applicable, will notify each Regulated Fund that holds securities of
the portfolio company of the proposed transaction at the earliest
practical time;
    (ii) the Adviser to each Regulated Fund that holds an investment in
the issuer will formulate a recommendation as to the proposed
participation, including the amount of the proposed investment, by such
Regulated Fund; and
    (iii) the Advisers will provide to the Board of each Regulated Fund
that holds an investment in the issuer all information relating to the
existing investments in the issuer of the Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds, including the terms of such investments and how they
were made, that is necessary for the Required Majority to make the
findings required by this Condition.
    (b) Enhanced Board Approval. The Adviser will provide its written
recommendation as to the Regulated Fund's participation to the Eligible
Directors, and the Regulated Fund will participate in such Follow-On
Investment solely to the extent that a Required Majority reviews the
proposed Follow-On Investment both on a stand-alone basis and together
with the Pre-Boarding Investments in relation to the total economic
exposure and other terms and makes the determinations set forth in
Condition 2(c). In addition, the Follow-On Investment may only be
completed in reliance on the Order if the Required Majority of each
participating Regulated Fund determines that the making and holding of
the Pre-Boarding Investments were not prohibited by section 57 (as
modified by rule 57b-1) or rule 17d-1, as applicable. The basis for the
Board's findings will be recorded in its minutes.
    (c) Additional Requirements. The Follow-On Investment may only be
completed in reliance on the Order if:
    (i) Original Investments. All of the Affiliated Funds' and
Regulated Funds' investments in the issuer are Pre-Boarding
Investments;
    (ii) Advice of counsel. Independent counsel to the Board advises
that the making and holding of the investments in the Pre-Boarding
Investments were not prohibited by section 57 (as modified by rule 57b-
1) or rule 17d-1, as applicable;
    (iii) Multiple Classes of Securities. All Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds that hold Pre-Boarding Investments in the issuer
immediately before the time of completion of the Co-Investment
Transaction hold the same security or securities of the issuer. For the
purpose of determining whether the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds
hold the same security or securities, they may disregard any security
held by some but not all of them if, prior to relying on the Order, the
Required Majority is presented with all information necessary to make a
finding, and finds, that: (x) Any Regulated Fund's or Affiliated Fund's
holding of a different class of securities (including for this purpose
a security with a different maturity date) is immaterial in amount,
including immaterial relative to the size of the issuer; and (y) the
Board records the basis for any such finding in its minutes. In
addition, securities that differ only in respect of issuance date,
currency, or denominations may be treated as the same security; and
    (iv) No control. The Affiliated Funds, the other Regulated Funds
and their affiliated persons (within the meaning of section 2(a)(3)(C)
of the Act), individually or in the aggregate, do not control the
issuer of the securities (within the meaning of section 2(a)(9) of the
Act).
    (d) Allocation. If, with respect to any such Follow-On Investment:
    (i) The amount of the opportunity proposed to be made available to
any Regulated Fund is not based on the Regulated Funds' and the
Affiliated Funds' outstanding investments in the issuer or the security
at issue, as appropriate, immediately preceding the Follow-On
Investment; and
    (ii) the aggregate amount recommended by the Advisers to be
invested in the Follow-On Investment by the participating Regulated
Funds and any participating Affiliated Funds, collectively, exceeds the
amount of the investment opportunity, then the Follow-On Investment
opportunity will be allocated among them pro rata based on the size of
the Internal Orders, as described in section III.A.1.b. of the
application.
    (e) Other Conditions. The acquisition of Follow-On Investments as
permitted by this Condition will be considered a Co-Investment
Transaction for all purposes and subject to the other Conditions set
forth in the application.
    10. Board Reporting, Compliance and Annual Re-Approval.
    (a) Each Adviser to a Regulated Fund will present to the Board of
each Regulated Fund, on a quarterly basis, and at such other times as
the Board may request, (i) a record of all investments in Potential Co-
Investment Transactions made by any of the other Regulated Funds or any
of the Affiliated Funds during the preceding quarter that fell within
the Regulated Fund's then-current Objectives and Strategies and Board-
Established Criteria that were not made available to the Regulated
Fund, and an explanation of why such investment opportunities were not
made available to the Regulated Fund; (ii) a record of all Follow-On
Investments in and Dispositions of investments in any issuer in which
the Regulated Fund holds any investments by any Affiliated Fund or
other Regulated Fund during the prior quarter; and (iii) all
information concerning Potential Co-Investment Transactions and Co-
Investment Transactions, including investments made by other Regulated
Funds or Affiliated Funds that the Regulated Fund considered but
declined to participate in, so that the Independent Directors, may
determine whether all Potential Co-Investment Transactions and Co-
Investment Transactions during the preceding quarter, including those
investments that the Regulated Fund considered but declined to
participate in, comply with the Conditions.

    (b) All information presented to the Regulated Fund's Board
pursuant to this Condition will be kept for the life of the Regulated
Fund and at least two years thereafter, and will be subject to
examination by the Commission and its staff.
    (c) Each Regulated Fund's chief compliance officer, as defined in
rule 38a-1(a)(4), will prepare an annual report for its Board each year
that evaluates (and documents the basis of that evaluation) the
Regulated Fund's compliance with the terms and Conditions of the
application and the procedures established to achieve such compliance.
    (d) The Independent Directors (including the non-interested members
of each Independent Party) will consider at least annually whether
continued participation in new and existing Co-Investment Transactions
is in the Regulated Fund's best interests.
    11. Record Keeping. Each Regulated Fund will maintain the records
required by section 57(f)(3) of the Act as if each of the Regulated
Funds were a BDC and each of the investments permitted under these
Conditions were approved by the Required Majority under section 57(f).
    12. Director Independence. No Independent Director (including the
non-interested members of any Independent Party) of a Regulated Fund
will also be a director, general partner, managing member or principal,
or otherwise be an ``affiliated person'' (as defined in the Act) of any
Affiliated Fund.
    13. Expenses. The expenses, if any, associated with acquiring,
holding or disposing of any securities acquired in a Co-Investment
Transaction (including, without limitation, the expenses of the
distribution of any such securities registered for sale under the
Securities Act) will, to the extent not payable by the Advisers under
their respective advisory agreements with the Regulated Funds and the
Affiliated Funds, be shared by the Regulated Funds and the
participating Affiliated Funds in proportion to the relative amounts of
the securities held or being acquired or disposed of, as the case may
be.
    14. Transaction Fees.\28\ Any transaction fee (including break-up,
structuring, monitoring or commitment fees but excluding brokerage or
underwriting compensation permitted by section 17(e) or 57(k)) received
in connection with any Co-Investment Transaction will be distributed to
the participants on a pro rata basis based on the amounts they invested
or committed, as the case may be, in such Co-Investment Transaction. If
any transaction fee is to be held by an Adviser pending consummation of
the transaction, the fee will be deposited into an account maintained
by the Adviser at a bank or banks having the qualifications prescribed
in section 26(a)(1), and the account will earn a competitive rate of
interest that will also be divided pro rata among the participants.
None of the Advisers, the Affiliated Funds, the other Regulated Funds
or any affiliated person of the Affiliated Funds or the Regulated Funds
will receive any additional compensation or remuneration of any kind as
a result of or in connection with a Co-Investment Transaction other
than (i) in the case of the Regulated Funds and the Affiliated Funds,
the pro rata transaction fees described above and fees or other
compensation described in Condition 2(c)(iii)(B)(z), (ii) brokerage or
underwriting compensation permitted by section 17(e) or 57(k) or (iii)
in the case of the Advisers, investment advisory compensation paid in
accordance with investment advisory agreements between the applicable
Regulated Fund(s) or Affiliated Fund(s) and its Adviser.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ Applicants are not requesting and the Commission is not
providing any relief for transaction fees received in connection
with any Co-Investment Transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    15. Independence. If the Holders own in the aggregate more than 25
percent of the Shares of a Regulated Fund, then the Holders will vote
such Shares as directed by an independent third party when voting on
(1) the election of directors; (2) the removal of one or more
directors; or (3) any other matter under either the Act or applicable
State law affecting the Board's composition, size or manner of
election.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-16830 Filed 7-31-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Telomer Research Program Analysis of Telomer Based Products and Telomer Treated Articles Scope and Rationale The Telomer Research Program ( TRP) 1 has studies underway to investigate the potential formation and/ or release of perfluorooctanoic acid ( PFOA) from telomer based products and consumer articles treated with such products. The purpose of this work is to determine whether articles treated with representative telomer based products contribute to significant human or environmental exposure to PFOA. The full scope of the program is outlined in the TRP Letter of Intent. 2 Project Overview The TRP has contracted with an outside research laboratory to analyze for the presence of PFOA in the major telomer based products in commerce and articles treated with those products. This screening study will investigate levels of PFOA in the three major end use categories: carpets, textiles and paper. The primary products that the TRP members market for these applications are polymers, which represent approximately 85% of the telomer based products that the TRP members manufacture and sell. The product classes to be tested are those that the respective TRP member companies manufacture as actual items of commerce.

While there are many potential telomer based polymeric products, a relatively small number represent the primary product classes in commerce ( 12 products). The results of this screening study will provide a comprehensive initial picture of exposure potential by focusing on these major end use polymeric products and the corresponding articles of commerce. The treated articles to be tested are actual carpet, textile, and paper substrates treated under representative or actual mill conditions with the subject telomer based polymeric products.

Approach and Methodology Method Development and Validation A significant amount of work was required to develop and coordinate the appropriate sampling, shipment and analysis plans as well as to synthesize and characterize primary and [ 1,2 13 C] perfluorooctanoic acid analytical standards. This initial work was conducted by analytical experts from the TRP member companies in parallel with efforts to solicit bids from potential contract labs. The initial work by the contract lab will require method development for quantita tive determination of PFOA in the various article matrices and telomer based products as well as 1 The companies participating in the TRP include Asahi Glass, Clariant GmbH, Daikin Industries and E. I. duPont de Nemours & Company. 2 Letter of Intent for the Telomer Research Program submitted to Stephen L. Johnson ( US EPA) on March 14, 2003. Ref. AR226_______.

Does not contain TSCA CBI TRP ( 31 Mar 03) 1 validation of the methodology for determining PFOA in treated articles. More on method development and method validation is discussed below.

Article Analysis Samples of the 12 telomer treated articles will be collected from pilot plant facilities or from commercial manufacturing facilities and analyzed for PFOA using the developed and validated analytical method. The study is designed as a screening study to determine whether PFOA is present in each treated article collected, and if it is present, at what levels and the confidence of those reported levels.

Types of Articles: representative textile, carpet and paper articles ( 12 total)

An LC/ MS/ MS methodology using a [ 1,2 13 C] perfluorooctanoic acid internal standard will be used for these analyses having the objective of attaining a lower limit of quantification of 1 part per billion ( ppb) with a relative standard deviation of less than 20%.

Method development will be conducted with the goal of having extraction efficiencies fall within 70 110% for three matrices  carpet ( nylon), textile ( polyester) and paper  at the three PFOA fortification levels of 1 ppb, 10 ppb and 100 ppb.

One hundred sixty two ( 162) untreated shaved carpet, textile and paper samples were generated for the method development and method validation portion of this study. If scouting experi ments show acceptable recoveries at the levels noted, the contract lab will proceed with method validation.

Method Validation for PFOA in Articles: The method for the determination of PFOA in treated articles will be validated at 1 ppb, 10 ppb and 100 ppb in each of carpet ( nylon), paper ( cellulose) and fabric ( polyester) under Good Laboratory Practices ( GLP). Method validation will comprise of demonstrating the accuracy and precision of the method by analyzing six samples spiked at each fortification level on two separate days. Hence, 36 samples for each article  6 each at 1 ppb, 10 ppb and 100 ppb on each day  will be analyzed for a total of 108 analyses over the two day period of the method validation. Analysis of articles will not proceed until method validation and protocol for analysis of articles has been approved.

Samples: Each of the 12 articles tested will be treated with a single telomer based polymeric product. Six ( 6) sub samples will be analyzed for each article/ product pair, selected using a block design approach. Seventy two ( 72) sub samples for articles ( 12 treated articles x 6 sub samples) will be generated and twelve ( 12) products will be collected for analysis resulting in four unique carpet/ product pairs, six unique textile/ product pairs and two unique paper/ product pairs. Included for each of the 12 articles will be 4 untreated samples to be used as control and for extraction efficiency verification.

Product Analysis This screening study is designed to determine the level of PFOA in each product class using an LC/ MS/ MS method. Matrix complexities may make these analyses particularly challenging.

Product Types: acrylate and urethane polymers ( 12 product formulations)

Does not contain TSCA CBI TRP ( 31 Mar 03) 2 Samples of the 12 primary telomer based polymeric products will be provided by TRP member companies to the contract lab for analysis. A standard addition approach using LC/ MS/ MS methodology is being used for these analyses of telomer based products, having lower limit of quantification for PFOA of 1 part per million ( ppm) with a relative standard deviation of 20%. A [ 1,2 13 C] perfluorooctanoic acid internal standard will be used throughout the study. Before the product samples are analyzed, extraction efficiencies will be evaluated on at least two or three product groups using modified methodologies supplied by the TRP. Product analyses are being conducted under GLP.

Results The results of this screening study will be prepared as a report, including the following details:

Summary of Method and Results Materials used Equipment used Reagents and standards used Analytical Procedures Preparation of stock standard solution, preparation of fortification of articles and preparation of calibration standards Pre processing of samples, sample fortification procedures, analyte extraction and final sample preparation procedures Instrumentation LC/ MS conditions LC/ MS Calibration and Samples Analysis Calculation Methods Results and Discussion Detector response Control and/ or Blank Recoveries Extraction Efficiency Limit of Quantification and Limit of Detection Conclusions Schedule Work by the TRP analytical experts began in January 2003 to develop the appropriate sampling, shipment and analysis procedures as well as primary and [ 1,2 13 C] perfluorooctanoic acid analytical standards for the proposed work. In concert with this effort, potential contract labs were identified and bids were solicited. The selected laboratory received the final study plans and sample requirements in February 2003. The internal standard was prepared by one of the TRP companies and delivered to the lab in March 2003.

Does not contain TSCA CBI TRP ( 31 Mar 03) 3 Does not contain TSCA CBI TRP ( 31 Mar 03) 4 The initial work to develop and validate analytical and sample methods will be conducted in March  April 2003. The analysis of telomer treated articles and telomer based polymeric products will be initiated in April 2003. The final report is expected by June / July 2003. The results will be provided to EPA as soon as they become available.


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64248-64249]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25603]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2014-0377]

Agency Information Collection Activities; New Information
Collection Request: Electronic Logging Device (ELD) Vendor Registration

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), Department
of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FMCSA
announces its plan to submit the Information Collection Request (ICR)
described below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for its
review and approval and invites public comment on the approval of a new
information collection request (ICR) entitled, Electronic Logging
Device Vendor Registration. This ICR will be used to enable
manufacturers of ELDs to register with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA).

DATES: We must receive your comments on or before December 29, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Docket Number FMCSA-2014-0377 using any of the
following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
     Mail: Docket Services; U.S. Department of Transportation,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building, Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m. e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and
docket number. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the exemption process, see the Public
Participation heading below. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov, and follow the
online instructions for accessing the dockets, or go to the street
address listed above.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement for the Federal Docket Management System
published in the Federal Register on January 17, 2008 (73 FR 3316), or
you may visit http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdfE8-794.pdf.
    Public Participation: The Federal eRulemaking Portal is available
24 hours each day, 365 days each year. You can obtain electronic
submission and retrieval help and guidelines under the ``help'' section
of the Federal eRulemaking Portal Web site. If you want us to notify
you that we received your comments, please include a self-addressed,
stamped envelope or postcard, or print the acknowledgement page that
appears after submitting comments online. Comments received after the
comment closing date will be included in the docket and will be
considered to the extent practicable.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Brian Routhier, Transportation
Specialist, Technology Division, Office of Analysis, Research and
Technology, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Department of
Transportation, West Building 6th Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Office hours are from 9:00 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Background: On March 28, 2014, FMCSA published a Supplemental
notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) entitled, ``Electronic Logging
Devices and Hours of Service Supporting Documents,'' (79 FR 17656),
which proposed to require the use of ELDs by those within the motor
carrier industry who are currently subject to Records of Duty Status
(RODS) preparation requirements. Specifically, the final rule proposed:
(1) Requiring new technical specifications for ELDs that address
statutory requirements; (2) mandating ELDs for drivers currently using
RODS. To ensure consistency among manufacturers and devices, functional
specifications were published with the SNPRM. Providers' certification
of compliance to these functional specifications is required. Providers
will also be required to register their compliant devices with FMCSA.
    The ELD providers will be asked to self-certify and register their
devices with FMCSA online via an application Form MCSA-5893,
``Electronic Logging Device (ELD) Vendor Registration and
Certification.'' FMCSA expects 100% of respondents to submit their
information electronically. Once completed, FMCSA will issue a unique
identification number that the provider will embed in their device(s).
    The FMCSA will maintain a list on its Web site of the current ELD
providers and devices that have been certified (by the providers) to
meet the technical specifications. The information will be necessary
for fleets and drivers to easily find a compliant ELD for their use in
meeting the FMCSA regulation requiring the use of ELDs.
    Title: Electronic Logging Device (ELD) Vendor Registration.
    OMB Control Number: 2126-00XX.
    Type of Request: New collection.
    Respondents: ELD vendors.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 22. FMCSA estimates that there
will be 22 respondents, 20 U.S. and 2 foreign ELD vendors, and that
each vendor will register an average of 4 devices. The total of 88
devices (4 devices x 22 vendors) exceeds the number of devices that
FMCSA is currently aware of, but the Agency has opted to use a
conservatively high count in order to avoid under-estimating the burden
for this ICR.
    Estimated Time per Response: 15 minutes first year and 7.5 minutes
in subsequent years. Each vendor will take an estimated 15 minutes of
preparation time plus 15 minutes per device to complete the initial
registration, for a total of 75 minutes (15 minutes of preparation time
+ 4 devices per vendor x 15 minutes per device) per vendor in the first
year. In subsequent years, it is expected that registration updates
will take half the initial time; therefore respondents will take an
estimated 7.5 minutes of preparation time + 4 devices per vendor x 7.5
minutes per device to complete registration updates, for a total

of 37.5 minutes per vendor in subsequent years.
    Expiration Date: N/A. This is a new ICR.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 18 hours [((22 respondents x 75
minutes in year 1) + (22 respondents x 37.5 minutes in year 2) + (22
respondents x 37.5 minutes in year 3)) = 3,300 minutes / 60 minutes per
hour = 55 / 3 year approval period = 18.33 hours, rounded to 18 hours].
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including: (1) Whether the proposed
collection is necessary for the performance of FMCSA's functions; (2)
the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways for FMCSA to enhance the
quality, usefulness, and clarity of the collected information; and (4)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize or include your
comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

     Issued under the authority of 49 CFR 1.87 on: October 21, 2014.
G. Kelly Regal,
Associate Administrator for Office of Research and Information
Technology and Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-25603 Filed 10-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P