[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46816-46817]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21630]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4339-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

Puerto Rico; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-4339-DR), dated September 20, 2017,
and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 28, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated September 26, 2017, the President

amended the cost-sharing arrangements regarding Federal funds provided
under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford
Act''), in a letter to Brock Long, Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security, under Executive
Order 12148, as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico resulting from Hurricane Maria beginning
on September 17, 2017, and continuing, is of sufficient severity and
magnitude that special cost sharing arrangements are warranted
regarding Federal funds provided under the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.
(the ``Stafford Act'').
    Therefore, I amend my declaration of September 20, 2017, to
authorize a 100 percent Federal cost share for debris removal and
emergency protective measures, including direct Federal assistance,
for 180 days from the date of the declaration.
    This adjustment to State and local cost sharing applies only to
Public Assistance costs and direct Federal assistance eligible for
such adjustments under the law. The Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act specifically prohibits a similar
adjustment for funds provided for Other Needs Assistance (Section
408), and the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (Section 404). These
funds will continue to be reimbursed at 75 percent of total eligible
costs.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-21630 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 20, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3148-3149]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01008]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2015-1033]

Information Collection Request to Office of Management and
Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625-0023

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Sixty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit an Information Collection Request
(ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting approval of
revisions to the following collection of information: 1625-0023, Barge
Fleeting Facility Records. Our ICR describes the information we seek to
collect from the public. Before submitting this ICR to OIRA, the Coast
Guard is inviting comments as described below.

DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before March 21, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number [USCG-2015-1033] to the Coast Guard using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public
participation and request for comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for further instructions on submitting comments.
    A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available from:
Commandant (CG-612), Attn: Paperwork Reduction Act Manager, U.S. Coast
Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr Ave SE., Stop 7710, Washington, DC
20593-7710.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:  Contact Mr. Anthony Smith, Office of
Information Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for questions on these documents.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    This Notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended. An ICR is an application to
OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a Coast Guard
collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains information
describing the Collection's purpose, the Collection's likely burden on
the affected public, an explanation of the necessity of the Collection,
and other important information describing the Collection. There is one
ICR for each Collection.
    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be
granted based on the Collection being necessary for the proper
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the
Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the Collection;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information
subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
Collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. In response to
your comments, we may revise this ICR or decide not to seek approval of
revisions of the Collection. We will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments
and related materials. Comments must contain the OMB Control Number of
the ICR and the docket number of this request, [USCG-2015-1033], and
must be received by March 21, 2016.

Submitting Comments

    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions. Documents mentioned in this notice, and all public
comments, are in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and
can be viewed by following that Web site's instructions. Additionally,
if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will
be notified when comments are posted.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).

Information Collection Request

    Title: Barge Fleeting Facility Records.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0023.
    Summary: The regulations require the person-in-charge of certain
barge fleeting facilities to keep records of twice daily inspections of
barge moorings and movements of barges and hazardous cargo in and out
of a facility.
    Need: Title 33 CFR 165.803 requirements are intended to prevent
barges from breaking away from a fleeting facility and drifting
downstream out of control in the congested Lower Mississippi River
waterway system.
    Forms: None.
    Respondents: Operators of barge fleeting facilities. It is
estimated that there are 47 respondents annually for this information
collection.
    Frequency: Daily.
    Hour Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has decreased from
50,453 hours to 11,076 hours a year due to a decrease in the estimated
annual number of respondents and number of responses.

    Authority:  The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended.

    Dated: January 12, 2016.
Thomas P. Michelli,
Deputy Chief Information Officer, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2016-01008 Filed 1-19-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: December 24, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 248)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 79035-79036]
[DOCID:fr24de08-30]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2008-1114; Airspace Docket No. 08-AGL-17]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Establishment of Low Altitude Area Navigation Route (T-
Route); Rockford, IL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish a low altitude Area
Navigation (RNAV) route, designated T-265, in the Chicago/Rockford
International Airport, IL, terminal area. T-routes are low altitude Air
Traffic Service routes, based on RNAV, for use by aircraft that have
instrument flight rules (IFR) approved Global Positioning System (GPS)/
Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) equipment. This action would
enhance safety and improve the efficient use of the navigable airspace
in the Chicago/Rockford International Airport, IL, terminal area west
of Chicago, IL.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 9, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2008-
1114 and Airspace Docket No. 08-AGL-17 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Airspace and Rules
Group, Office of System Operations Airspace and AIM, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2008-1114 and Airspace Docket No. 08-AGL-17) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to FAA Docket No. FAA-2008-1114 and Airspace Docket No. 08-AGL-17.''
The postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.

    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://
www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_
amendments/ .
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. An
informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at
the office of the Central Service Center, Air Traffic Organization,
Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to establish a low altitude RNAV route in
the Chicago/Rockford International Airport, IL, terminal area. The
route, designated as T-265, would be depicted on the appropriate IFR En
Route Low Altitude charts. This T-route is only intended for use by
GPS/GNSS-equipped aircraft and is being proposed to enhance safety and
to facilitate the more flexible and efficient use of the navigable
airspace for en route IFR operations transitioning through the Chicago/
Rockford International terminal airspace area west of Chicago, IL.
    Low altitude RNAV routes are published in paragraph 6011 of FAA
Order 7400.9S signed October 3, 2008, and effective October 31, 2008,
which is incorporated by reference in14 CFR 71.1. The low altitude RNAV
routes listed in this document will be published subsequently in the
Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under Department of Transportation (DOT)
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it establishes a low altitude Area Navigation route (T-Route) at
Rockford, IL.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 311a, 311b, and 311k. This airspace action is
not expected to cause any potentially significant environmental
impacts, and no extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant
preparation of an environmental assessment.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order
7400.9S, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed October 3,
2008, and effective October 31, 2008, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6011 United States Area Navigation Routes.

* * * * *

T-265 KELSI to VEENA [New]

KELSI, IL.....................      WP  (lat. 41[deg]26'20''N., long.
                                         88[deg]59'29''W.)
SIMMN, IL.....................      WP  (lat. 41[deg]58'50''N., long.
                                         88[deg]52'42''W.)
BULLZ, IL.....................      WP  (lat. 42[deg]27'27''N., long.
                                         88[deg]46'17''W.)
VEENA, WI.....................      WP  (lat. 42[deg]42'18''N., long.
                                         88[deg]18'14''W.)

* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 12, 2008.
Edith V. Parish,
Manager, Airspace and Rules Group.
[FR Doc. E8-30636 Filed 12-23-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13543-13546]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5725]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0217; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-165-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model DC-9-81 (MD-
81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), DC-9-87 (MD-87), and MD-88
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD would require a detailed
inspection to detect distress and existing repairs to the leading edge
structure of the vertical stabilizer at the splice at Station Zfs =
52.267; repetitive inspections for cracking in the front spar cap
forward flanges of the vertical stabilizer, and either the aft flanges
or side skins; repetitive inspections for loose and missing fasteners;
and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. This
proposed AD was prompted by reports of cracked vertical stabilizer
skin, a severed front spar cap, elongated fastener holes at the leading
edge of the vertical stabilizer, and a cracked front spar web and front
spar cap bolt holes in the vertical stabilizer. We are proposing this
AD to detect and correct such cracking damage, which could result in
the structure being unable to support limit load, and could lead to the
loss of the vertical stabilizer.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 28, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800-0019, Long Beach, California 90846-
0001; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, extension 2; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roger Durbin, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, Los Angeles ACO, FAA, 3960 Paramount Blvd.,
Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-
mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0217;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-165-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We have received two reports of cracked vertical stabilizer skin at
Station Zfs = 52.267. Subsequent inspection revealed a severed front
spar cap and a cracked front spar web. Cracks were also found on
several other Model MD-80 airplanes in the front spar cap bolt holes of
the vertical stabilizer. The affected Model MD-80 airplanes had accrued
between 39,749 and 56,212 total flight hours and between 32,176 and
44,001 total landing cycles when the cracks/anomalies were found. The
cause of the skin cracks is high loading occurrences, such as, but not
limited to, in-flight turbulence. Cracks in the vertical stabilizer
leading edge and front spar cap could result in the structure being
unable to support limit load, and could lead to the loss of the
vertical stabilizer.

Related Rulemaking

    We are considering similar rulemaking for The Boeing Company Model
MD-90-30 airplanes. The Model MD-90 airplane vertical stabilizer is
similar in design and loading to that of the Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-
9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), DC-9-87 (MD-87), and MD-88 airplanes
vertical stabilizer.

Relevant Service Information

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A067, dated June
24, 2010. The service information describes procedures for a detailed
inspection to detect distress in and existing repairs to the leading
edge structure of the vertical stabilizer at the splice at Station Zfs
= 52.267, and corrective action if necessary. The corrective action is
doing a leading edge repair, if the leading edge is distressed, by
repairing or replacing the leading edge splice band of the vertical
stabilizer. The service information defines ``distress'' as deformed
holes, elongated holes, oversized holes or cracks in the leading edge
skin and splice; and ``existing repairs'' as bushings, washers or
reinforcing repairs to the leading edge.
    The service information also describes procedures for repetitive
inspections for cracking in the front spar cap of the vertical
stabilizer using the inspections specified in Option 1 or Option 2 of
the service information, and related investigative and corrective
actions if necessary.
    Option 1 involves an open hole eddy current high frequency (ETHF)
inspection of the forward flanges and a radiographic testing inspection
of the aft flanges; Option 2 involves an open hole ETHF inspection of
the forward flanges and an ETHF surface inspection of the side skins of
the aft flanges. For airplanes on which any cracking is found, the
related investigative action is confirming the cracking through a
specified evaluation/verification process. The corrective action is
contacting Boeing and doing the repair in accordance with Boeing's
instructions.
    The service information also describes procedures for repetitive
detailed inspections for indications of loose and missing fasteners of
the stabilizer leading edge structure of the vertical at the splice at
Station Zfs = 52.267, and corrective actions if necessary. The
corrective action, if any loose or missing fasteners are found, is
repairing the leading edge by repairing or replacing the leading edge
splice band of the vertical stabilizer.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or

develop in other products of the same type designs.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously.

Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service Information

    The service bulletin specifies to contact the manufacturer for
instructions on how to repair certain conditions, but this proposed AD
would require repairing those conditions in one of the following ways:
     In accordance with a method that we approve, or
     Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) whom we have
authorized to make those findings.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 668 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection for existing repairs,        10 work-hours x $85 per               $0            $850        $567,800
 distress.                               hour = $850.
Repetitive inspections for cracking     7 work-hours x $85 per                 0             595         397,460
 and loose and missing fasteners.        hour = $595.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2011-0217; Directorate Identifier
2010-NM-165-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by April 28, 2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model DC-9-81 (MD-81),
DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), DC-9-87 (MD-87), and MD-88
airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A067, dated June 24, 2010.

Subject

    (d) Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport
Association (ATA) of America Code 55, Stabilizers.

Unsafe Condition

    (e) This AD was prompted by reports of cracked vertical
stabilizer skin, a severed front spar cap, elongated fastener holes
at the leading edge of the vertical stabilizer, and a cracked front
spar web and front spar cap bolt holes in the vertical stabilizer.
We are issuing this AD to detect and correct such cracking damage,
which could result in the structure being unable to support limit
load, and could lead to the loss of the vertical stabilizer.

Compliance

    (f) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

Inspections

    (g) Within 4,500 flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD, do a detailed inspection for distress in and existing repairs to
the leading edge structure of the vertical stabilizer at the splice
at Station Zfs = 52.267, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A067, dated
June 24, 2010.

Repetitive Inspections for Cracks, and Related Investigative and
Corrective Actions

    (h) Before further flight after doing the inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, inspect for cracks of the left and right
vertical stabilizer front spar cap, in accordance with either Option
1 or Option 2 as specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A067, dated June 24, 2010. If
any crack is found, before further flight, evaluate and verify to
confirm all crack indications in accordance with the Accomplishment

Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A067, dated
June 24, 2010.
    (1) If any cracking is confirmed, before further flight, repair
using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (l) of this AD.
    (2) If no cracking is confirmed, repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed the applicable interval
specified in paragraph (h)(2)(i) or (h)(2)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) If the most recent inspection was done using Option 1, the
next inspection must be done within 4,400 flight cycles.
    (ii) If the most recent inspection was done using Option 2, the
next inspection must be done within 3,000 flight cycles.

Leading Edge Repair

    (i) If leading edge distress is found during the detailed
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD, before further
flight and after accomplishing the inspection required by paragraph
(h) of this AD, repair the leading edge, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-
55A067, dated June 24, 2010.

Inspection for Loose/Missing Fasteners

    (j) For airplanes on which no cracking is confirmed during the
initial inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD: At the
applicable time specified in paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD,
do a detailed inspection for indications of loose and missing
fasteners, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A067, dated June 24, 2010. If
any loose or missing fastener is found, before further flight,
repair the leading edge, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A067, dated
June 24, 2010.
    (1) If the inspection required by paragraph (h) was done using
Option 1, do the inspection required by paragraph (j) of this AD
within 4,400 flight cycles after accomplishing the inspection
required by paragraph (h) of this AD.
    (2) If inspection required by paragraph (h) was done using
Option 2, do the inspection required by paragraph (j) of this AD
within 3,000 flight cycles after accomplishing the inspection
required by paragraph (h) of this AD
    (k) For airplanes on which no cracking is confirmed during the
most recent inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD: Repeat
the inspection for loose and missing fasteners required by paragraph
(j) of this AD thereafter at intervals not to exceed the applicable
time specified in paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this AD.
    (1) If the most recent inspection required by paragraph (h) was
done using Option 1, the next inspection required by paragraph (j)
of this AD must be done within 4,400 flight cycles after
accomplishing the most recent inspection required by paragraph (j)
of this AD.
    (2) If the most recent inspection required by paragraph (h) was
done using Option 2, the next inspection required by paragraph (j)
of this AD must be done within 3,000 flight cycles after the most
recent inspection required by paragraph (j) of this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (l)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO to
make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair
must meet the certification basis of the airplane and 14 CFR 25.571,
Amendment 45, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.

Related Information

    (m) For more information about this AD, contact Roger Durbin,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, Los Angeles ACO, FAA,
3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (n) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800-0019, Long Beach, California 90846-
0001; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, extension 2; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, the FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 4, 2011.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-5725 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 116 (Thursday, June 16, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36272-36274]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12937]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0681; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-01292-T]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-2A12 airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by reports that significant water accumulation
was discovered in the oxygen service compartment access panels of
multiple airplanes. This proposed AD would require modifying the oxygen
service compartment door to introduce a means of water drainage. The
FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 1,
2022.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Bombardier
Business Aircraft Customer Response Center, 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road
West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email [email protected]; internet https://www.bombardier.com.
You may view this service information at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0681; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for Docket
Operations is listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gabriel Kim, Aerospace Engineer,
Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services Section, FAA, New York
ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2022-0681; Project Identifier
MCAI-2021-01292-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
the proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM

contain commercial or financial information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the
submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission
containing CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked
submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed
in the public docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be
sent to Gabriel Kim, Aerospace Engineer, Mechanical Systems and
Administrative Services Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is
not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.

Background

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued TCCA AD CF-2021-40, dated November 19,
2021 (TCCA AD CF-2021-40) (also referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information, or the MCAI), to correct an
unsafe condition for certain Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-2A12
airplanes. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-
0681.
    This proposed AD was prompted by reports that significant water
accumulation was discovered in the oxygen service compartment access
panels during production activities on multiple airplanes. An
investigation concluded that this compartment had insufficient means of
water drainage when the oxygen servicing pressure box and passenger
door switch pressure box access panel doors are closed. The oxygen
servicing pressure box panel may submerge the O2 indicator
(pressure gauge) dial, which is not rated for immersion and can
potentially lead to its failure, causing an oxygen leakage. The FAA is
proposing this AD to address water ingress through the oxygen service
compartment access panels of the oxygen servicing pressure box and
passenger door switch pressure box. If not addressed, the freeze/thaw
cycle of accumulated water may damage oxygen connections inside the
compartment, leading to oxygen leakage and risk of fire in the presence
of an ignition source. See the MCAI for additional background
information.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Bombardier, Inc., has issued Service Bulletin 700-52-7508, Revision
01, dated January 13, 2021. This service information describes
procedures for, among other actions not specified in this proposed AD,
modifying the oxygen service compartment door to introduce a means of
water drainage. The modification also includes a general visual
inspection for damage of the oxygen access panel placard, and
replacement of a damaged placard.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority,
the FAA has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
and service information referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD
because the FAA evaluated all the relevant information and determined
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop
on other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information already described.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 40 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following
costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 work-hours x $85 per hour = $340...........................              $0             $340          $13,600
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition action that would be required based on the results of any
required actions. The FAA has no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need this on-condition action:

                 Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Cost per
              Labor cost                   Parts cost        product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85......             $40             $125
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate.
According to the manufacturer, however, some or all of the costs of
this proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the
cost impact on affected operators.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil

aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices,
methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in
air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2022-0681; Project Identifier MCAI-
2021-01292-T.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by August 1, 2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-2A12
airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Bombardier
Service Bulletin 700-52-7508, Revision 01, dated January 13, 2021.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 35, Oxygen.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports that significant water
accumulation was discovered in the oxygen service compartment of
multiple airplanes. The FAA is issuing this AD to address water
ingress through oxygen service compartment access panels. If not
addressed, the freeze/thaw cycle of accumulated water may damage
oxygen connections inside the compartment, leading to oxygen leakage
and risk of fire in the presence of an ignition source.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    Within 25 months after the effective date of this AD: Modify the
oxygen service compartment door in accordance with Part A of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-52-
7508, Revision 1, dated January 13, 2021.

(h) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-52-7508, dated
September 4, 2020.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If
sending information directly to the manager of the certification
office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or
Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If
approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature.

(j) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) TCCA AD CF-2021-40, dated November 19, 2021, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2022-0681.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Gabriel Kim,
Aerospace Engineer, Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services
Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier Business Aircraft Customer Response Center, 400
C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected]; internet
https://www.bombardier.com. You may view this service information at
the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued on June 10, 2022.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-12937 Filed 6-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: November 3, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 211)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 57049]
[DOCID:fr03no09-26]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0435; FRL-8976-2]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Corrections to
the Arizona and Nevada State Implementation Plans; Withdrawal of
Proposed Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 8, 2009 (74 FR 51824), EPA published a rule
proposing to delete certain statutes and rules that were erroneously
approved by EPA under the Clean Air Act as part of the Arizona and
Nevada state implementation plans. EPA is withdrawing this previously
published rule, and in this Federal Register, we are publishing a
proposed rule that replaces the October 8, 2009, proposed rule.

DATES: The proposed rule published on October 8, 2009 (74 FR 51824) is
withdrawn as of November 3, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Allen, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4120<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 8, 2009 (74 FR 51824), EPA
published a rule proposing to delete certain statutes and rules that
were erroneously approved by EPA under the Clean Air Act as part of the
Arizona and Nevada state implementation plans. The statutes and rules
that EPA proposed to delete relate to general declarations of policy,
advisory committees, variances, and incidental fees and nuisance odors.
Due to a clerical error, the proposed rule that was published on
October 8, 2009 was inconsistent with the signed document.
Consequently, we are withdrawing the proposed rule published on October
8, 2009, and in this Federal Register, we are publishing the proposed
rule as originally signed. The proposed rule being published in this
Federal Register replaces the following proposed rule published on
October 8, 2009:
    Title: Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans;
Corrections to the Arizona and Nevada State Implementation Plans
(Proposed rule, 74 FR 51824, October 8, 2009, EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0435).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: October 19, 2009.
Nancy Lindsay,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E9-26327 Filed 11-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P