[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 146 (Friday, July 29, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 45483-45484]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19268]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[EPA-HQ-SFUND-1998-0007; FRL-9445-8]

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List: Notice of Intent for Deletion of the State
Marine of Port Arthur Superfund Site

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 6 is issuing
a Notice of Intent to Delete the State Marine of Port Arthur (SMPA)
Superfund Site located in Port Arthur, Texas, from the National
Priorities List (NPL) and requests public comments on this proposed
action. The NPL, promulgated pursuant to section 105 of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an appendix of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and the
State of Texas, through the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality,
have determined that all appropriate response actions at these
identified parcels under CERCLA, other than Five-Year Reviews, have
been completed. However, this deletion does not preclude future actions
under Superfund.

DATES: Comments must be received by August 29, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-1998-0007, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow Internet on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail: Rafael Casanova<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Rafael A. Casanova; U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 6; Superfund Division (6SF-RA); 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite
1200; Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
     Hand delivery: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 6; 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700; Dallas, Texas 75202-2733;
Contact: Rafael A. Casanova<PHONE_NUMBER>. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-
1998-0007. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly

to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at: (1) U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6; 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700;
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733; Hours of operation: Monday thru Friday, 9
a.m. to 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. Contact: Rafael A. Casanova (214)
665-7437.
    (2) Port Arthur Public Library; 4615 9th Avenue; Port Arthur, Texas
77642-5799; Hours of operation: Monday thru Thursday, 9 a.m. to 9 p.m.;
Friday, 9 a.m. to 6 p.m.; Saturday, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.; and Sunday, 2
p.m. to 5 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rafael A. Casanova, Remedial Project
Manager; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6; Superfund
Division (6SF-RA); 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200; Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the ``Rules and Regulations'' Section of
today's Federal Register, we are publishing a direct final Notice of
Deletion for SMPA Superfund Site without prior Notice of Intent for
Deletion because EPA views this as a noncontroversial revision and
anticipates no adverse comments. We have explained our reason for this
deletion in the preamble to the direct final Notice of Deletion, and
those reasons are incorporated herein. If we receive no adverse
comment(s) on this deletion action, we will not take further action on
this Notice of Intent for Deletion. If we receive adverse comment(s),
we will withdraw the direct final Notice of Deletion and it will not
take effect. We will, as appropriate, address all public comments in a
subsequent final Notice of Deletion based on this Notice of Intent for
Deletion. We will not institute a second comment period on this Notice
of Intent for Deletion. Any parties interested in commenting must do so
at this time.
    For additional information, see the direct final Notice of Deletion
which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR
2923; 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.

    Dated: July 22, 2011.
Al Armendariz,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2011-19268 Filed 7-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 60 (Friday, March 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 17526]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06881]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:
    Docket Numbers: EG14-32-000.
    Applicants: Copper Mountain Solar 3, LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification of EG or FC of Copper Mountain
Solar 3, LLC.
    Filed Date: 3/20/14.
    Accession Number: 20140320-5067.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/10/14.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER14-376-002.
    Applicants: MATL LLP.
    Description: MATL LLP submits tariff filing per 35: Order 764
Compliance to be effective 11/12/2013.
    Filed Date: 3/20/14.
    Accession Number: 20140320-5058.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/10/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1157-001.
    Applicants: Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Amendment to 271 to be effective 3/28/2014.
    Filed Date: 3/19/14.
    Accession Number: 20140319-5125.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/9/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1537-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc., New England Power Pool
Participants Committee.
    Description: Regulation Market Changes to be effective 5/21/2014.
    Filed Date: 3/20/14.
    Accession Number: 20140320-5033.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/10/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1538-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Notice of Termination
for the Elite Energy Systems, LLC SGIA, Service Agreement No. 226 under
PG&E FERC Electric Volume No. 4.
    Filed Date: 3/20/14.
    Accession Number: 20140320-5051.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/10/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1539-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc. submits: Update OASIS
Definition to be effective 5/19/2014.
    Filed Date: 3/20/14.
    Accession Number: 20140320-5053.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/10/14.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 21, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-06881 Filed 3-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 52 (Thursday, March 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14658-14659]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6312]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2010-0351; FRL-9281-9]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Paint Stripping and Miscellaneous
Surface Coating Operations at Area Sources (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR which is abstracted below describes the
nature of the collection and the estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before April 18,
2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2010-0351, to (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency,
Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center, mail code
28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460; and (2)
OMB at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Learia A. Williams, Office of
Compliance, Mail Code 2223A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202)
564-7021; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On June 2, 2010 (75 FR 30813), EPA sought comments on this ICR
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any additional
comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days
of this notice.

    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OECA-2010-0351, which is available for public viewing
online at http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the
Enforcement and Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC),
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The
EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number
for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, as EPA
receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For
further information about the electronic docket, go to
www.regulations.gov.
    Title: NESHAP for Paint Stripping and Miscellaneous Surface Coating
Operations at Area Sources (Renewal).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2268.03, OMB Control Number 2060-0607.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on April 30, 2011.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: The affected entities are subject to the General
Provisions of the NESHAP at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A, and any changes
or additions to the Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart
HHHHHH.
    Owners or operators of the affected facilities must submit a one-
time-only report of any physical or operational changes, initial
performance tests, and periodic reports and results. Owners or
operators are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and
duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of
an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system
is inoperative. Reports, at a minimum, are required semiannually.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners or operators of paint
stripping and miscellaneous surface coating operations area sources.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 39,812.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, annually and on-occasion.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 124,527 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $11,423,194, which includes
$11,280,974 in labor costs, no capital/startup costs, and $142,220 in
operation and maintenance (O&M) costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a net decrease in labor hours
and a net increase in cost to the Respondents in this ICR compared to
the previous ICR. A decrease in hour burden to respondents occurs
because the burden estimates for the previous ICR were based on
requirements applicable during the first three years after promulgation
of the rule. The burden presented in this ICR is based on estimates of
burden to industry after the initial three-year period. This ICR uses
the most recent labor rates to estimate the cost burden to the
industry, which reflect a higher cost per hour.
    There is an increase in O&M cost to the Respondents in this ICR
compared to the previous ICR. The increase is due to updates in the O&M
estimates using information that applies after the first three-year
period of the regulation.
    There is an increase in the total number of responses in this ICR
compared to the previous ICR. This increase occurs because the estimate
of total number of responses for the previous ICR was based on
requirements applicable during the first three years after promulgation
of the final rule. Additionally, new sources each year become subject
to recordkeeping and reporting requirements. The estimate of total
number of responses presented in this ICR is based on burden to
industry after the initial three-year period.

    Dated: March 11, 2011.
John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2011-6312 Filed 3-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 14 (Wednesday, January 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3649-3652]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01108]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-71312; File No. SR-BOX-2014-01]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Options Exchange LLC; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend the Fee Schedule To Establish Fees for Complex Order Price
Improvement Period (``COPIP'') Transactions

January 15, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby
given that on January 9, 2014, BOX Options Exchange LLC (the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\
which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') a proposed rule change to amend the Fee Schedule to
establish fees for Complex Order Price Improvement Period (``COPIP'')
transactions on the BOX Market LLC (``BOX'') options facility. The text
of the proposed rule change is available from the principal office of
the Exchange, at the Commission's Public Reference Room and also on the
Exchange's Internet Web site at http://boxexchange.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, Proposed Rule Change

 1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule for trading on BOX
to establish fees for COPIP \5\ transactions. The Exchange recently
amended its rules to permit Complex Orders \6\ to be submitted to a
price improvement period auction mechanism similar to the existing
Price Improvement Period (``PIP'') mechanism for single option series
on BOX.\7\ The Exchange believes the COPIP will result in more
efficient transactions, reduced execution risk to BOX Options
Participants, and greater opportunities for price improvement. The
Exchange is submitting this filing to describe the fees that are
applicable to COPIP transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ As defined in Rule 7245, the term ``COPIP'' means Complex
Order Price Improvement Period.
    \6\ As defined in Rule 7240(a)(5), the term ``Complex Order''
means any order involving the simultaneous purchase and/or sale of
two or more different options series in the same underlying
security, for the same account, in a ratio that is equal to or
greater than one-to-three (.333) and less than or equal to three-to-
one (3.00) and for the purpose of executing a particular investment
strategy.
    \7\ See Securities Release No. 71148 (December 19, 2013), 78 FR
78437 (December 26, 2013) (Order Approving SR-BOX-2013-43).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Generally, the Exchange proposes to treat COPIP transactions in the
same manner as PIP transactions within the BOX Fee Schedule. While
standard Complex Order transactions are subject to the fees and credits
set forth in Section III (Complex Order Transaction Fees) of the Fee
Schedule, COPIP transactions will instead be subject to Sections I
(Exchange Fees) and II (Liquidity Fees and Credits).
    First, the Exchange proposes to add language throughout Section I
(Exchange Fees) to state that Auction Transactions fees will now
include those transactions executed through the COPIP and that all
COPIP transactions will be charged per contract per leg. The Exchange
currently assesses Exchange Fees based on transaction type and account
type with distinct fees for Auction Transactions (transactions executed
through the BOX Price Improvement Period, Solicitation, and
Facilitation auction mechanisms), and non-Auction Transactions
(transactions executed on the BOX Book). Specifically, for Public
Customers the Exchange proposes to assess a $0.00 per contract fee for
COPIP Orders \8\ and a $0.15 per contract fee for Improvement Orders
\9\ in the COPIP. For Professional Customers and Broker Dealers, the
Exchange proposes to assess a $0.37 per contract fee for both COPIP
Orders and Improvement Orders in the COPIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ As defined in Rule 7245, the term ``COPIP Order'' means a
Complex Order designated for the COPIP.
    \9\ As defined in Rule 7245, the term ``Improvement Order''
means a competing Complex Order submitted to BOX by an Order Flow
Provider or Market Maker during a COPIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The remaining types of Exchange Fees are based upon a Participant's
monthly average daily volume (``ADV'') in Auction Transactions and Non-
Auction Transactions. The Exchange proposes that Exchange Fees for
Initiating Participants, regardless of account type, who submit a
Primary Improvement Order \10\ in the COPIP will be based upon a
Participants' monthly average daily volume (``ADV'') in all Auction
Transactions as calculated at the end of each month and detailed in
Section I.A. For Market Makers, the Exchange proposes to assess a per
contract, tiered, execution fee on COPIP Orders and Improvement Orders
in the COPIP under Section I.B that is based on their monthly ADV in
all transactions executed on BOX, as calculated at the end of each
month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ As defined in Rule 7245, the term ``Primary Improvement
Order'' means the matching contra order equal to the full size of
the corresponding COPIP Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, the Exchange proposes to treat COPIP transactions in the
same manner as PIP transactions for liquidity fees and credits, which
are applied in addition to any applicable exchange fees as described in
Section I of the Fee Schedule. Specifically, the Exchange proposes that
COPIP Orders (i.e., the agency orders opposite the Primary Improvement
Order) receive a ``removal'' credit and Improvement Orders in the COPIP
be charged an ``add'' fee.
    Specifically, the Exchange proposes that COPIP transactions in
classes where the minimum price variation of $0.01 (i.e., Penny Pilot
classes where the trade price is less than $3.00 and all series in

QQQ, SPY, and IWM) will be assessed a fee for adding liquidity or
provided a credit for removing liquidity of $0.35, regardless of
account type. For COPIP transactions where the minimum price variation
is greater than $0.01 (i.e., all non-Penny Pilot Classes, and Penny
Pilot Classes where the trade price is equal to or greater than $3.00,
excluding QQQ, SPY, and IWM), the Exchange proposes a fee for adding
liquidity or a credit for removing of $0.75, regardless of account
type. In addition, the Exchange proposes to specify that an Unrelated
Order \11\ that is not immediately marketable will be charged as an
Improvement Order when it executes against a COPIP Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ As defined in Rule 7245, the term ``Unrelated Order'' means
a non-Improvement Order entered on BOX during a COPIP or BOX Book
Interest during a COPIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For Jumbo SPY Option COPIP Transactions, the Exchange proposes to
treat these transactions in the same manner as Jumbo SPY PIP
transactions. Specifically, Jumbo SPY Option COPIP Orders will be
charged a ``removal'' fee of $0.50 and Jumbo SPY Option COPIP
Improvement Orders will receive an ``add'' credit of $0.30. The
Exchange also proposes to clarify that this section is not applicable
to Complex Order transactions in Jumbo SPY Options and that an
Unrelated Jumbo SPY Option Order that is not immediately marketable
will receive the ``add'' credit as an Improvement Order when it
executes against a Jumbo SPY Option COPIP Order.
    Finally, the Exchange proposes to amend Section III (Complex Order
Transaction Fees) to clarify that the transaction fees and credits set
forth in this section will apply to executions of Complex Orders;
except that COPIP transactions will be subject to Sections I (Exchange
Fees) and II (Liquidity Fees and Credits). The Exchange notes that the
Options Regulatory Fee \12\ outlined in Section V (Regulatory Fees)
will apply to all COPIP transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The Options Regulatory Fee is assessed to each BOX Options
Participant for all options transactions executed or cleared by the
BOX Options Participant that are cleared by The Options Clearing
Corporation (OCC) in the customer range regardless of the exchange
on which the transaction occurs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act, in general, and Section
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\13\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among BOX Participants and other persons using its facilities
and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers
or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed COPIP transaction fees are
reasonable, equitable and non-discriminatory. The COPIP is a new
auction mechanism that allows Participants to submit Complex Orders in
substantially the same manner as they currently submit orders for
single option series instruments in the PIP. As such the Exchange
believes it is reasonable for the COPIP fees to mimic the current PIP
transaction fees. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed
COPIP fees will allow the Exchange to be competitive with other
exchanges and to apply fees and credits in a manner that is equitable
among all BOX Participants. The Exchange operates within a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily direct
order flow to any other competing exchange if they determine fees at a
particular exchange to be excessive. The COPIP transaction fees are
intended to attract Complex Orders to the Exchange by offering market
participants incentives to submit their Complex Orders through the
COPIP. The Exchange believes it is appropriate to provide incentives
for market participants to submit orders to the COPIP, resulting in
greater liquidity and ultimately benefiting all Participants trading on
the Exchange.
Exchange Fees
    The Exchange believes it is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory that Public Customers be charged lower Exchange Fees in
COPIP transactions than Professionals, Broker-Dealers and Market
Markers on BOX. The securities markets generally, and BOX in
particular, have historically aimed to improve markets for investors
and develop various features within the market structure for customer
benefit. As such, the Exchange believes the proposed fees for Public
Customer transactions in COPIP transactions are reasonable and not
unfairly discriminatory. The Exchange believes it promotes the best
interests of investors to have lower transaction costs for Public
Customers, and that lower COPIP transaction fees will attract Public
Customer order flow to BOX.
    Moreover, the Exchange believes that assessing Professionals and
Broker-Dealers a higher Exchange fee than Public Customers for COPIP
transactions is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
because these types of Participants are more sophisticated and have
higher levels of order flow activity and system usage. This level of
trading activity draws on a greater amount of BOX system resources than
that of Public Customers, and thus, generates greater ongoing BOX
operational costs. Further, the Exchange believes that charging
Professionals and Broker-Dealers the same fee for all COPIP
transactions is not unfairly discriminatory as the fees will apply to
all Professionals and Broker-Dealers equally. Professionals and Broker-
Dealers remain free to change the manner in which they access BOX.
    The Exchange believes its proposal to charge Initiating
Participants in COPIP transactions based on the Participant's ADV in
all Auction Transactions, including COPIP transactions, is reasonable.
The Exchange believes that providing a volume discount to Options
Participants that initiate auctions on Customer orders incentivizes
these Participants to submit their customer orders to the COPIP for
potential price improvement. Additionally, the Exchange believes it is
reasonable for Participants initiating a COPIP to be assessed a lower
fee than those providing responses. Initiating Participants guarantee
the COPIP Order, and are subject to market risk during the time period
the COPIP Order is exposed to other BOX Participants. While other COPIP
Participants are also subject to market risk, those providing responses
in the COPIP through Primary Improvement Orders are not permitted to
cancel their orders and may only modify their Primary Improvement
Order, including reducing their order quantity, by providing a better
price. The Exchange believes that the Initiating Participant acts in a
critical role in the COPIP as their willingness to guarantee the
customer COPIP Order is the keystone to the customer order gaining the
opportunity for price improvement.
    Further, the Exchange believes it is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to provide Initiating Participants a tiered fee
structure related to their participation in Auction Transactions,
including COPIP transactions. The proposed fee structure for Primary
Improvement Orders in the COPIP is related to trading activity in BOX
Auction Transactions and is available to all BOX Options Participants;
they may choose to trade on BOX to take advantage of the discounted
fees for doing so, or not. Participants will benefit from the
opportunity to aggregate their trading in the BOX auction mechanisms to
more easily attain a discounted fee tier. The tiered fee structure in
the BOX auction mechanisms aims to attract order flow to BOX, providing
greater potential liquidity within the overall BOX market

and its auction mechanisms, to the benefit of all BOX market
participants.
    Finally, the Exchange believes it is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory for BOX Market Makers to have the opportunity to benefit
from lower COPIP transaction fees than the fees charged to other
Participants. Generally, Market Makers have obligations on BOX that
other Participants do not. They must maintain active two-sided markets
in the classes in which they are appointed, and must meet certain
minimum quoting requirements. Market Makers also provide significant
contributions to overall market quality. Specifically, Market Makers
can provide high volumes of liquidity and lowering their COPIP
transaction fees will help attract a higher level of Market Maker order
flow and create liquidity, which the Exchange believes will ultimately
benefit all Participants trading on BOX. As such, the Exchange believes
it is appropriate that Market Makers be charged lower COPIP transaction
fees on BOX.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed tiered and discounted COPIP
transaction fees for Market Makers that, on a daily basis, trade an
average daily volume (as calculated at the end of the month) of 5,001
contracts or more on BOX represent a fair and equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges as they are aimed at
incentivizing these Participants to provide a greater volume of
liquidity. The Exchange believes that giving incentives for this
activity results in increased volume on BOX, which benefits all
Participants.
    The Exchange also believes it is reasonable, equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory to include COPIP transactions to calculate the
tier a Market Maker has reached because doing so will provide the
Market Maker with an opportunity to qualify for increased rebates and,
therefore, incentivize these Participants to trade more of such order
flow on the Exchange.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed COPIP transaction fees will
keep BOX competitive with other exchanges as well as be applied in such
a manner so as to be equitable among all BOX Participants. The Exchange
believes the proposed fees are fair and reasonable and must be
competitive with fees in place on other exchanges. Further, the
Exchange believes that this competitive marketplace impacts the fees
proposed for BOX.
Liquidity Fees and Credits
    The Exchange believes it is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to assess the proposed fees for COPIP transactions
because the proposed fee for adding liquidity and credit for removing
liquidity will apply uniformly to all categories of participants,
across all account types. The Exchange also believes the proposed
liquidity fees and credits for COPIP transactions to be reasonable. The
proposed fee structure aims to attract order flow to the COPIP,
potentially providing greater liquidity within the overall BOX market
to the benefit of all BOX market participants. The Exchange notes that
the proposed fees and credits for transactions on BOX offset one
another in any particular transaction. The result is that BOX will
collect a fee from Participants that add liquidity on BOX and credit
another Participant an equal amount for removing liquidity. Stated
otherwise, the collection of these liquidity fees will not directly
result in revenue to BOX, but will simply allow BOX to provide the
credit incentive to Participants in order to attract order flow. The
Exchange believes it is appropriate to provide incentives to market
participants to direct order flow to remove liquidity from BOX, similar
to various and widely-used exchange-sponsored payment for order flow
programs. Further, the Exchange believes that fees for adding liquidity
on BOX will not deter Participants from seeking to add liquidity to the
BOX market so that they may interact with those participants seeking to
remove liquidity.
    The Exchange believes it is reasonable to assess the proposed COPIP
liquidity fees and credits at a lower rate ($0.35) in classes with a
minimum price variation of $0.01 (i.e., Penny Pilot classes where trade
price is less than $3.00, and all series in QQQ, SPY and IWM); compared
to a higher rate ($0.75) in classes with a minimum price variation of
greater than $0.01 (i.e., all Non-Penny Pilot classes and Penny Pilot
classes where trade price is equal to or greater than $3.00, excluding
QQQ, SPY & IWM that trade in increments of $0.05 or more). The Exchange
believes that options which trade at these wider spreads merit offering
greater inducement for market participants. In particular, within the
PIP, minimum increments of $.05 or $.10 provide greater opportunity for
market participants to offer price improvement. As such, BOX believes
that the opportunity for additional price improvement provided by these
wider spreads again merits offering greater incentive for Participants
to increase the potential price improvement for customer orders in
these PIP transactions.
    The Exchange believes it is reasonable and equitable to treat a
non-immediately marketable Unrelated Order that executes against a
COPIP Order as an Improvement Order for purposes of the Exchange's
liquidity fees. The COPIP liquidity fees and credits are intended to
attract order flow to the Exchange by offering incentives to all market
participants to participate in the COPIP. The COPIP Unrelated Order is
either a non-Improvement Order entered on BOX during a COPIP or BOX
Book Interest during a COPIP. Currently, a Participant that submits a
non-Improvement Order, which then executes against a COPIP Order,
receives the same trading benefit as a Participant who submits an
Improvement Order. While these Unrelated Orders are not typically
submitted on the opposite side of a COPIP Order, they should be charged
the appropriate ``add'' fee once they execute against a COPIP Order.
Further, the Exchange believes it is reasonable and equitable for a
Participant that has submitted the BOX Book Interest to be charged the
``add'' fee when that order executes against a COPIP Order. The
Participant receives the benefit of a COPIP execution and would already
expect to be charged a fee for adding liquidity under Section II.C. of
the Fee Schedule. Therefore the fee would be no different than the fee
the Participant was expecting to pay. The Exchange believes that
treating non-immediately marketable Unrelated Orders as Improvement
Orders is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the
applicable liquidity fees will apply uniformly to all categories of
participants, across all account types.
Complex Order Transaction Fees
    As stated above, the Exchange believes treating COPIP transactions
in the same manner as PIP transactions for purposes of the BOX Fee
Schedule is appropriate. The Exchange proposes to clarify this approach
by stating that unlike Complex Orders, COPIP transactions will not be
subject to this section.
Regulatory Fees
    Finally, the Exchange believes that charging the standard ORF for
COPIP transactions is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory since the costs to the Exchange to process quotes,
orders, trades and implement the necessary regulatory surveillance
programs and procedures for these

transactions remain the same. The ORF is in place to help the Exchange
offset regulatory expenses and the Exchange's cost of supervising and
regulating Participants, including performing routine surveillances,
and policy, rulemaking, interpretive, and enforcement activities
remains the same for COPIP transactions.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed change is designed
to provide greater specificity and precision within the Fee Schedule
with respect to the fees that will be applicable to COPIP transactions.
    The Exchange believes that adopting COPIP Fees will not impose a
burden on competition among various Exchange Participants. The fees
proposed are meant to mimic the fees currently assessed on a
substantially similar auction mechanism on BOX. Submitting a COPIP is
entirely voluntary and Participants can determine which type of order
they wish to submit, if any, to the Exchange.
    Further, the Exchange believes that the proposed COPIP fees will
enhance competition between exchanges because it is designed to allow
the Exchange to better compete with other exchanges for Complex Order
flow. In this regard, the COPIP is a new mechanism being introduced by
the Exchange and BOX is unable to absolutely determine the impact that
the COPIP fees proposed herein will have on trading. That said,
however, the Exchange believes that the proposed COPIP fees would not
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed liquidity fees and
credits burden competition by creating such a disparity between the
fees an Initiating Participant in the COPIP pays and the fees a
competitive responder pays that would result in certain participants
being unable to compete with initiators. These fees and credits are
identical to those for the PIP auction mechanism, which have not had a
negative impact on competition. BOX notes that its market model and
fees are generally intended to benefit retail customers by providing
incentives for Participants to submit their customer order flow to BOX,
particularly the PIP and now the COPIP. In fact, the Exchange believes
that these changes will not impede these Participants from adding
liquidity and competing in the COPIP and will help promote competition
by providing incentives for market participants to submit customer
order flow to BOX and thus, create a greater opportunity for retail
customers to receive additional price improvement.
    Finally, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor
competing exchanges. In such an environment, the Exchange must
continually review, and consider adjusting, its fees and credits to
remain competitive with other exchanges. For the reasons described
above, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects
this competitive environment.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Exchange Act \14\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)
thereunder,\15\ because it establishes or changes a due, or fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend the rule
change if it appears to the Commission that the action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
would otherwise further the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BOX-2014-01 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2014-01. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2014-01 and should be
submitted on or before February 12, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-01108 Filed 1-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17138]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7192]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0002]

Food and Drug Administration Clinical Trial Requirements,
Regulations, Compliance, and Good Clinical Practice; Public Workshop

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of public workshop.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Denver District Office, in
co-sponsorship with the Society of Clinical Research Associates
(SoCRA), is announcing a public workshop. The public workshop on FDA's
clinical trial requirements is designed to aid the clinical research
professional's understanding of the mission, responsibilities, and
authority of FDA and to facilitate interaction with FDA
representatives. The program will focus on the relationships among FDA
and clinical trial staff, investigators, and institutional review
boards (IRBs). Individual FDA representatives will discuss the informed
consent process and informed consent documents; regulations relating to
drugs, devices, and biologics; as well as inspections of clinical
investigators, IRBs, and research sponsors.
    Date and Time: The public workshop will be held on May 4 and 5,
2011, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Location: The public workshop will be held at The Curtis Hotel,
1405 Curtis St., Denver, CO 80202, 1-303-571-0300.
    Attendees are responsible for their own accommodations. Please
mention SoCRA to receive the hotel room rate of $119 plus applicable
taxes (available until the SoCRA room block is filled).
    Contact: David Arvelo, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Food and Drug
Administration, 4040 N. Central Expressway, suite 900, Dallas, Texas
75204,<PHONE_NUMBER>, FAX<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or
    Society of Clinical Research Associates (SoCRA), 530 West Butler
Ave., suite 109, Chalfont, PA 18914,<PHONE_NUMBER>, FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>,
e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Web site: http://www.SoCRA.org.
    Registration: The registration fee covers the cost of actual
expenses, including refreshments, lunch, materials, and speaker
expenses. Seats are limited; please submit your registration as soon as
possible. Workshop space will be filled in order of receipt of
registration. Those accepted into the public workshop will receive
confirmation. The cost of registration follows:

                          Cost of Registration
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
SoCRA member..............................  $575.00
SoCRA nonmember (includes membership).....  $650.00
Federal Government SoCRA member...........  $450.00
Federal Government SoCRA nonmember........  $525.00
FDA Employee..............................  Fee Waived
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please
contact SoCRA (see Contact) at least 21 days in advance.
    Extended periods of question and answer and discussion have been
included in the program schedule. SoCRA designates this educational
activity for a maximum of 13.3 Continuing Education (CE) Credits for
SoCRA CE and Nurse CNE. SoCRA designates this educational activity for
a maximum of 13.3 American Medical Association Physician's Recognition
Award Category 1 Credit(s)\TM\. Physicians should claim credit
commensurate with the extent of their participation. SoCRA is
accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical
Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. SoCRA
is an approved provider of continuing nursing education by the
Pennsylvania State Nurses Association (PSNA), an accredited approver by
the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation
(ANCC). ANCC/PSNA Provider Reference Number: 205-3-A-09.
    Registration instructions: To register, please submit a
registration form with your name, affiliation, mailing address,
telephone, fax number, and email, along with a check or money order
payable to ``SoCRA.'' Mail to: SoCRA (see Contact for address). To
register on the Internet, go to http://www.socra.org/html/FDA_Conference.htm. (FDA has verified the Web site addresses throughout
this document, but we are not responsible for any subsequent changes to
the Web site after this document publishes in the Federal Register.)
    Payment by major credit card is accepted (Visa/MasterCard/AMEX
only). For more information on the meeting registration, or for
questions on the public workshop, contact SoCRA (see Contact).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The public workshop helps fulfill the
Department of Health and Human Services' and FDA's important mission to
protect the public health. The public workshop will provide those
engaged in FDA-regulated (human) clinical trials with information on a
number of topics concerning FDA requirements related to informed
consent, clinical investigation requirements, IRB inspections,
electronic record requirements, and investigator initiated research.
Topics for discussion include the following: (1) What FDA Expects in a
Pharmaceutical Clinical Trial; (2) Adverse Event Reporting--Science,
Regulation, Error, and Safety; (3) Part 11 Compliance--Electronic
Signatures; (4) Informed Consent Regulations; (5) IRB Regulations and
FDA Inspections; (6) Keeping Informed and Working Together; (7) FDA
Conduct of Clinical Investigator Inspections; (8) Meetings With FDA:
Why, When, and How; (9) Investigator Initiated Research; (10) Medical
Device Aspects of Clinical Research; (11) Working With FDA's Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research; (12) The Inspection Is Over--What
Happens Next? Possible FDA Compliance Actions; (13) Ethical Issues in
Subject Enrollment; (14) Medical Device Aspects of Clinical Research;
and (15) Are We There Yet? An Overview of the FDA Good Clinical
Practice Program.
    FDA has made education of the drug and device manufacturing
community a high priority to help ensure the quality of FDA-regulated
drugs and devices. The public workshop helps to achieve objectives set
forth in section 406 of the FDA Modernization Act of 1997 (21 U.S.C.
393) which includes working closely with stakeholders and maximizing
the availability and clarity of information to stakeholders and the
public. The public workshop also is consistent with the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121) as
outreach activities by Government Agencies to small businesses.

    Dated: March 23, 2011.
David Dorsey,
Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2011-7192 Filed 3-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 126 (Thursday, June 30, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38304-38305]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16408]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2011-0585]

Safety Zones; Annual Fireworks Events in the Captain of the Port
Detroit Zone

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce two safety zones for annual
fireworks events in the Captain of the Port Detroit zone at various
times from 10 p.m. on July 3, 2011 through 9 p.m. on July 5, 2011. This
action is necessary and intended to ensure safety of life on the
navigable waters immediately prior to, during, and immediately after
fireworks events. This rule will establish restrictions upon, and
control movement of, vessels in a specified area immediately prior to,
during, and immediately after fireworks events. During an enforcement
period, no person or vessel may enter the safety zone without
permission of the Captain of the Port.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.941 will be enforced from 10 p.m.
until 11 p.m. on July 3, 2011 and then again from 8:30 p.m. until 9
p.m. on July 4, 2011. In the event of inclement weather, each
enforcement period will be postponed 24 hours.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice,
call or e-mail LT Katie Stanko, Prevention, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Detroit, 110 Mount Elliot Ave., Detroit MI, 48207; telephone (313) 568-
9508, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the following
safety zones published in the Federal Register on August 8, 2008 (73 FR
46197) and on June 9, 2010 (75 FR 32666):

Section 165.941(a)(39) Port Sanilac 4th of July Fireworks, Port
Sanilac, MI

    This regulation will be enforced from 10 p.m. to 11 p.m. on July 3,
2011. In the case of inclement weather on July 3, 2011, this regulation
will be enforced from 10 p.m. to 11 p.m. on July 4, 2011.

Section 165.941(a)(48) Tawas Area 4th of July Fireworks, Tawas City, MI

    This regulation will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. to 9 p.m. on July
4, 2011. In the case of inclement weather on July 4, 2011, this
regulation will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. to 9 p.m. on July 5, 2011.
    Under the provisions of 33 CFR 165.23, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within these safety zones while they are being enforced is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Detroit or his
designated representative. Vessels that wish to transit through any of
the safety zones may request permission from the Captain of the Port
Detroit. Requests must be made in advance and approved by the Captain
of Port before transits will be authorized. Approvals will be granted
on a case by case basis. The Captain of the Port may be contacted via
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Detroit on channel 16, VHF-FM. The Coast Guard
will give notice to the public via a Broadcast to Mariners that the
regulation is in effect.
    This notice is issued under authority of 33 CFR 165.941 and 5
U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this notice in the Federal Register, the
Coast Guard will provide the maritime community with advance
notification of these enforcement periods via the Broadcast Notice to
Mariners or Local Notice to Mariners. The Captain of the Port, or his
authorized representative, will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners
notifying the public when enforcement of the safety zones established
by this section are suspended. If the Captain of the Port Detroit
determines that the safety zones need not be enforced for the full
duration stated in this notice, he may use a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners to grant general permission to enter the safety zone.

    Dated: June 21, 2011.
E.J. Marohn,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2011-16408 Filed 6-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


(3) 6-AM (number)
    (4) Hydrocodone (number)
    (5) Hydromorphone (number)
    (6) Oxycodone (number)
    (7) Oxymorphone (number)
    (d) Phencyclidine (number)
    (e) Amphetamines (number)
    (1) Amphetamine (number)
    (2) Methamphetamine (number)
    (3) MDMA (number)
    (4) MDA (number)
5. Adulterated (number)
6. Substituted (number)
7. Invalid Result (number)

0
38. Revise Appendix C to Part 40 to read as follows:

Appendix C to Part 40--DOT Drug-Testing Semi-Annual Laboratory Report
to DOT

    Mail, fax, or email to:
U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy
and Compliance, W62-300, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590, Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Email: [email protected].

    The following items are required on each report:
Reporting Period: (inclusive dates)
Laboratory Identification: (name and address)
1. DOT Specimen Results Reported (total number)
2. Negative Results Reported (total number)
Negative (number)
Negative-Dilute (number)
3. Rejected for Testing Results Reported (total number)
By Reason
(a) Fatal flaw (number)
(b) Uncorrected Flaw (number)
4. Positive Results Reported (total number)
By Drug
(a) Marijuana Metabolite (number)
(b) Cocaine Metabolite (number)
(c) Opioids (number)
    (1) Codeine (number)
    (2) Morphine (number)
    (3) 6-AM (number)
    (4) Hydrocodone (number)
    (5) Hydromorphone (number)
    (6) Oxycodone (number)
    (7) Oxymorphone (number)
(d) Phencyclidine (number)
(e) Amphetamines (number)
    (1) Amphetamine (number)
    (2) Methamphetamine (number)
    (3) MDMA (number)
    (4) MDA (number)
5. Adulterated Results Reported (total number)
By Reason (number)
6. Substituted Results Reported (total number)
7. Invalid Results Reported (total number)
By Reason (number)

0
39. Revise Appendix D to Part 40 to read as follows:

Appendix D to Part 40--Report Format: Split Specimen Failure To
Reconfirm

    Mail, fax, or submit electronically to:

U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy
and Compliance, W62-300, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590, Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Submit Electronically: https://www.transportation.gov/content/split-specimen-cancellation-notification-49-cfr-part-40187-appendix-d
    The following items are required on each report:
    1. MRO name, address, phone number, and fax number.
    2. Collection site name, address, and phone number.
    3. Date of collection.
    4. Specimen I.D. number.
    5. Laboratory accession number.
    6. Primary specimen laboratory name, address, and phone number.
    7. Date result reported or certified by primary laboratory.
    8. Split specimen laboratory name, address, and phone number.
    9. Date split specimen result reported or certified by split
specimen laboratory.
    10. Primary specimen results (e.g., name of drug, adulterant) in
the primary specimen.
    11. Reason for split specimen failure-to-reconfirm result (e.g.,
drug or adulterant not present, specimen invalid, split not
collected, insufficient volume).
    12. Actions taken by the MRO (e.g., notified employer of failure
to reconfirm and requirement for recollection).
    13. Additional information explaining the reason for
cancellation.
    14. Name of individual submitting the report (if not the MRO)

0
40. Amend Appendix H to Part 40 by:
0
a. Revising the introductory text; and
0
b. Removing the instruction sheet entitled: ``U.S. DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING MIS DATA COLLECTION FORM
INSTRUCTION SHEET''.
    The revision reads as follows:

Appendix H to Part 40--DOT Drug and Alcohol Testing Management
Information System (MIS) Data Collection Form

    The following form is the MIS Data Collection form required for
use to report calendar year MIS data.
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC on November 3, 2017.
Elaine L. Chao,
Secretary of Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2017-24397 Filed 11-9-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 22, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36479-36480]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15267]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 174 and 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0602; FRL-8878-1]

Receipt of a Pesticide Petition Filed for Residues of Pesticide
Chemicals in or on Various Commodities

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of filing of petition and request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the Agency's receipt of an initial
filing of a pesticide petition requesting the establishment or
modification of regulations for residues of pesticide chemicals in or
on various commodities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 22, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0602 and the pesticide petition number
(PP), by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours of operation (8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2010-0602 and the pesticide petition number (PP). EPA's policy is that
all comments received will be included in the docket without change and
may be made available on-line at http://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided, unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not
submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected
through regulations.gov or e-mail. The regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and
other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk
or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available at http://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either in the electronic
docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of
operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Chao, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
    3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low-income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.

II. What action is the agency taking?

    EPA is announcing receipt of a pesticide petition filed under
section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21
U.S.C. 346a, requesting the establishment or modification of
regulations in 40 CFR part 174 or part 180 for residues of pesticide
chemicals in or on various food commodities. The Agency is taking
public comment on the request before responding to the petitioner. EPA
is not proposing any particular action at this time. EPA has determined
that the pesticide petition described in this document contains data or
information prescribed in FFDCA section 408(d)(2); however, EPA has not
fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or
whether the data supports granting of the pesticide petition. After
considering the public comments, EPA intends to evaluate whether and
what action may be warranted. Additional data may be needed before EPA
can make a final determination on this pesticide petition.
    Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a summary of the petition that is the
subject of this document, prepared by the petitioner, is included in a
docket EPA has created for this rulemaking. The docket for this
petition is available on-line at http://www.regulations.gov.
    As specified in FFDCA section 408(d)(3), (21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3)),
EPA is publishing notice of the petition so that the public has an
opportunity to comment on this request for the establishment or
modification of regulations for residues of pesticides in or on food
commodities. Further information on the petition may be obtained
through the petition summary referenced in this unit.
    Notice of the Agency's receipt of the following petition was
previously announced in the Federal Register of August 11, 2010 (75 FR
48667) (FRL-8840-6), however, the petition document was not made
available in the docket. Therefore, EPA is republishing notice of the
petition so that the public has an opportunity to comment on this
request for the establishment or modification of regulations for
residues of pesticides in or on food commodities.
    PP 0F7734. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., P.O. Box 18300,
Greensboro, NC 27410, proposes to establish a tolerance in 40 CFR part
180 for residues of the insecticide thiamethoxam, (3-[(2-chloro-5-
thiazolyl) methyl]tetrahydro-5-methyl-N-nitro-4H-1,3,5-oxadiazin-4-
imine) and its metabolite [N-(2-chloro-thiazol-5-ylmethyl)-N'-methyl-
N'-nitroguanidine], in or on food commodities/feed commodities (other
than those covered by a higher tolerance as a result of use on growing
crops) in food/feed handling establishments at 0.01 part per million
(ppm). Syngenta Crop Protection has submitted practical analytical
methodology for detecting and measuring levels of thiamethoxam in or on
raw agricultural commodities. This method is based on crop specific
cleanup procedures and determination by liquid chromatography with
either ultraviolet (UV) or mass spectrometry (MS) detections. The limit
of detection (LOD) for each analyte of this method is 1.25 nanogram
(ng) injected for samples analyzed by UV and 0.25 ng injected for
samples analyzed by MS, and the limit of quantification (LOQ) is 0.005
ppm for milk and juices, and 0.01 ppm for all other substrates.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives,
Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    Dated: June 7, 2011.
 Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011-15267 Filed 6-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 221 (Thursday, November 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 68163]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27867]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: [77 FR 67408,
November 9, 2012]

STATUS: Closed Meeting.

PLACE: 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC.

DATE AND TIME OF PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED MEETING: Friday, November 9,
2012.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: Cancellation of Meeting.
    The Closed Meeting scheduled for Friday, November 9, 2012 at 9:00
a.m. has been cancelled.
    For further information please contact the Office of the Secretary
at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 9, 2012.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-27867 Filed 11-13-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 216 (Thursday, November 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77342-77343]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24800]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2023-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2380]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before February 7, 2024.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the
respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-2380, to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email) [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected]; or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at https://www.floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_overview.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location
https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the tables. For communities
with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies can be
identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM date
listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Nicholas A. Shufro,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Eddy County, North Dakota and Incorporated Areas
          Project: 23-08-0013S Preliminary Date: June 30, 2023
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of New Rockford...................  City Hall, 117 1st Street
                                          South, New Rockford, ND 58356.
Unincorporated Areas of Eddy County....  Eddy County Courthouse, 524
                                          Central Avenue, New Rockford,
                                          ND 58356.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Foster County, North Dakota and Incorporated Areas
          Project: 23-08-0014S Preliminary Date: June 30, 2023
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Grace City.....................  Auditor's Office, 391 George
                                          Street, Grace City, ND 58445.
Unincorporated Areas of Foster County..  Foster County Courthouse, 1000
                                          5th Street N, Carrington, ND
                                          58421.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Wells County, North Dakota and Incorporated Areas
          Project: 23-08-0015S Preliminary Date: June 30, 2023
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Fessenden......................  City Hall, 602 Railway Street
                                          S, Fessenden, ND 58438.
City of Hamberg........................  City Hall, 323 Highway 30,
                                          Hamberg, ND 58341.
City of Harvey.........................  City Hall, 120 West 8th Street,
                                          Harvey, ND 58341.
Unincorporated Areas of Wells County...  Wells County Courthouse, 700
                                          Railway Street N, #37,
                                          Fessenden, ND 58438.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           McCook County, South Dakota and Incorporated Areas
           Project: 18-08-0045S Preliminary Date: May 26, 2023
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Bridgewater....................  Main Street Plaza, 232 North
                                          Main Avenue, Bridgewater, SD
                                          57319.
City of Montrose.......................  City Hall, 100 West Main
                                          Street, Montrose, SD 57048.
City of Salem..........................  City Hall, 400 North Main
                                          Street, Salem, SD 57058.
Town of Spencer........................  City Hall, 306 Main Street,
                                          Spencer, SD 57374.
Unincorporated Areas of McCook County..  McCook County Auditor's Office,
                                          130 West Essex Avenue, Salem,
                                          SD 57058.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Spink County, South Dakota and Incorporated Areas
          Project: 18-08-0010S Preliminary Date: April 14, 2023
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Ashton.........................  City Hall, 14 Main Street,
                                          Ashton, SD 57424.
City of Conde..........................  City Hall, 343 Broadway Street,
                                          Conde, SD 57434.
City of Doland.........................  City Hall, 106 North 2nd
                                          Street, Doland, SD 57436.
City of Frankfort......................  City Hall, 404 Maple Street,
                                          Frankfort, SD 57440.
City of Redfield.......................  City Hall, 626 Main Street,
                                          Redfield, SD 57469.
Town of Northville.....................  Town Hall, 402 Thayer Street,
                                          Northville, SD 57465.
Town of Tulare.........................  Community Hall, 112 Main
                                          Street, Tulare, SD 57476.
Town of Turton.........................  Farmers State Bank, 123 East
                                          Center Street, Turton, SD
                                          57477.
Unincorporated Areas of Spink County...  Spink County Courthouse, 210
                                          East 7th Avenue, Redfield, SD
                                          57469.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2023-24800 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P