[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 23 (Friday, February 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7428-7429]
[FR Doc No: 2023-02255]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP22-486-000]

Texas Eastern Transmission, LP; Notice To Prepare an
Environmental Assessment and Revised Schedule for Environmental Review
of The Appalachia to Market II and Entriken HP Replacement Project

    On July 7, 2022, Texas Eastern, LP (Texas Eastern) filed an
application in Docket No. CP22-486-000 requesting a Certificate of
Public Convenience and Necessity pursuant to Section 7(c) and
Authorization pursuant to Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act to
construct, operate, and abandon certain natural gas pipeline
facilities. The proposed project is known as the Appalachian to Market
II and Entriken HP Replacement Project (Project) and is designed to
improve system reliability and to allow Texas Eastern to provide up to
55,000 dekatherms per day of firm natural gas transportation service to
two local gas distribution companies in New Jersey.
    On August 19, 2022, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC
or Commission) issued a Notice of Intent (NOI) which identified July
14, 2023 as the issuance date for the final Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS). However, Commission staff now intends to prepare an
Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Project and has therefore revised
the planned schedule for the completion of the environmental review.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 40 CFR 1501.10 (2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The August 19, 2022 NOI announced the opening of a 30-day scoping
period which closed on September 19, 2022. Commission staff will
consider the information gathered and comments received during scoping
in the preparation of the EA; interested stakeholders do not need to
resubmit comments previously submitted. Commission staff will make the
EA available for public review and inspection, and solicit comments on
the document from the public. The Commission will review and consider
any future comments received on the EA in its consideration of the
Project.
    This notice identifies the revised schedule for completion of the
EA for Texas Eastern's Project.

Schedule for Environmental Review

Issuance of the EA: February 10, 2023
90-day Federal Authorization Decision Deadline: \2\ May 11, 2023
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The Commission's deadline applies to the decisions of other
federal agencies, and state agencies acting under federally
delegated authority, that are responsible for federal
authorizations, permits, and other approvals necessary for proposed
projects under the Natural Gas Act. Per 18 CFR 157.22(a), the
Commission's deadline for other agency's decisions applies unless a
schedule is otherwise established by federal law.

    If a schedule change becomes necessary, an additional notice will
be provided so that the relevant agencies are kept informed of the
Project's progress.

Additional Information

    In order to receive notification of the issuance of the EA and to
keep track of

all formal issuances and submittals in specific dockets, the Commission
offers a free service called eSubscription. This can reduce the amount
of time you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing
you with notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct
links to the documents. Go to https://www.ferc.gov/ferc-online/overview
to register for eSubscription.
    Additional information about the Project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs at (866) 208-FERC or on the
FERC website (www.ferc.gov). Using the ``eLibrary'' link, select
``General Search'' from the eLibrary menu, enter the selected date
range and ``Docket Number'' excluding the last three digits (i.e.,
CP22-486), and follow the instructions. For assistance with access to
eLibrary, the helpline can be reached at<PHONE_NUMBER>, TTY (202) 502-
8659, or at [email protected]. The eLibrary link on the FERC
website also provides access to the texts of formal documents issued by
the Commission, such as orders, notices, and rule makings.

    Dated: January 27, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-02255 Filed 2-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50718-50719]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20080]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-72864; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2014-86]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSEArca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 6.70
to Make the Rule Applicable to All Transactions on the Exchange

August 19, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that August 11, 2014, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to proposes to [sic] amend Rule 6.70 to make
the rule applicable to all transactions on the Exchange. The text of
the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.70 to make the rule
applicable to all transactions on the Exchange.
    Rule 6.70 currently provides that the price at which a non-
electronic order is executed shall be binding notwithstanding that an
erroneous report in respect thereto may have been rendered, or no
report rendered. The rule further provides that a report shall not be
binding if a non-electronic order was not actually executed but was in
error reported to have been executed. For example, if a report is
issued that an non-electronic execution occurred, when in fact it did
not, that report is not binding. This rule is relevant because OTP
Holders rely on reports from the Exchange to determine whether they
have engaged in a transaction on the Exchange. Commentary .02 to Rule
6.70 further provides that the terms of the rule apply only to
transactions occurring on the floor of the Exchange and does not apply
to transactions occurring on the NYSE Arca electronic trading system.
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.70 to make it applicable to
all reports on the Exchange, including reports relating to transactions
occurring on the NYSE Arca electronic trading system. As proposed, if
the Exchange issues a report of an electronic transaction to an OTP
Holder when in fact that execution did not occur, that report of an
execution would not be binding. The Exchange believes the proposed rule
change would enable the Exchange to apply the same rule to all reports
of executions, regardless of whether it is an electronic transaction.
To effect this change, the Exchange proposes to delete the term ``non
electronic'' in the first and second sentences of the rule text and
delete Commentary .02 to the rule. The Exchange notes that the proposed
rule change would harmonize the rules of the Exchange with the rules of
NYSE MKT LLC (``NYSE MKT''), which operates NYSE Amex Options LLC, as
well as the rules of the Chicago Board Options Exchange Incorporated
(``CBOE''), International Securities Exchange, LLC (``ISE''), BATS
Exchange,

Inc. (``BATS''), and Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC
(``MIAX'').\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See NYSE MKT Rule 958NY, CBOE Rule 6.52, ISE Rule 719, BATS
Rule 21.11, and MIAX Rule 522. The Exchange notes that ISE, BATS,
and MIAX operate all-electronic options exchanges, accordingly, the
rule is not limited on other markets to solely floor-based
transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act,\5\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\6\
in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
national market system and promote a fair and orderly market because it
would govern all reports regarding transactions that execute at the
Exchange, regardless of whether the transaction occurred on the Floor
or electronically. Accordingly, the proposed rule change would remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of free and open market by
ensuring that Rule 6.70 governs all reports similarly, and not just
those relating to non-electronic transactions. The proposed rule change
would also remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free
and open market and national market system because it would promote
harmonization among options exchange market rules for rules of similar
meaning. Specifically, only the NYSE Arca version of the rule limits
its application to non-electronic transactions. By contrast, NYSE MKT
and CBOE, which both operate trading floors, do not limit their
versions of the same rule to non-electronic transactions. Moreover,
options exchanges that only trade electronically have in place similar
rules.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Supra n. 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Rather, the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change is pro-competitive because it
would align the Exchange's rules with the rules of other markets,
including CBOE, NYSE MKT, ISE and MIAX.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\9\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \10\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),\11\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \12\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2014-86 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2014-86 This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2014-86, and should
be submitted on or before September 15, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-20080 Filed 8-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 65730-65734]
[FR Doc No: 2019-25853]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2019-0765]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zones; Waterway Training Areas, Captain of the Port
Maryland-National Capital Region Zone

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish four safety zones
for certain waters of the Patapsco River, Chesapeake Bay, and Potomac
River. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on
these navigable waters at Baltimore Harbor Anchorage No. 5, between
Belvidere Shoal and Kent Island, MD, between Point Lookout, MD, and St.
George Island,

MD, and between Possum Point, VA, and Cockpit Point, VA, during non-
lethal signaling and warning device training conducted from on board
U.S. Coast Guard vessels. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit
persons and vessels from being in the safety zones unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region or a
designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before December 30, 2019.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2019-0765 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ron Houck, Sector Maryland-
National Capital Region Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DOD Department of Defense
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NM Nautical mile
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    The U.S. Coast Guard uses the LA51, a non-lethal signaling and
warning device, to support the service's ports, waterways and coastal
security mission. Coast Guard personnel use the LA51 device as a
warning signal during enforcement operations for getting the attention
of non-responsive vessels. The LA51 is a two-part (flash bang)
ammunition round fired from a 12-gauge military shotgun to produce a
visible signal at a range of 100 meters. The explosive pyrotechnic
flash is a bright, white light lasting less than one second with a loud
report (170 decibels at the source). To maintain ports, waterways and
coastal security mission readiness, Coast Guard personnel within the
Maryland-National Capital Region COTP Zone (the ``Maryland-National
Capital Region'') must conduct LA51 device training shoreward of the 12
nautical miles (NM) baseline. At the present time, Coast Guard Stations
within the Maryland-National Capital Region use the DOD firing range
located in the Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of Chesapeake Beach, MD,
described at 33 CFR 334.170) (DOD Chesapeake Beach firing range) for
LA51 training. But, the Maryland-National Capital Region needs
additional LA51 training locations.
    While the Coast Guard uses DOD-established and controlled water
ranges for LA51 training when reasonably feasible, there are no DOD
ranges other than the Chesapeake Bay zone within the Maryland-National
Capital Region that are feasible for the Coast Guard to use for LA51
training. While other DOD ranges exist within the Maryland-National
Capital Region, DOD has been unable to accommodate USCG's requests to
utilize these ranges for LA51 training. And, currently within the
Maryland-National Capital Region there are no existing Coast Guard-
designated waterway training areas. The lack of alternative feasible
DOD ranges or Coast Guard waterway training areas within the Maryland-
National Capital Region poses significant logistical challenges and
requires some Coast Guard Station personnel to travel considerable
distances to the DOD Chesapeake Beach firing range. Given that the
training must occur during favorable weather conditions, the long
distance to the range adds additional logistical burdens to holding
these trainings. To better accommodate these training needs the COTP
Maryland-National Capital Region is proposing to establish four safety
zones for use as waterway training areas.
    Although the LA51 has a low risk of significant injury, hazards
from LA51 device training events include risks of injury or death
resulting from near or actual contact among training vessels and
waterway users. These risks may arise if normal vessel traffic were to
interfere with the training event, and training vessels operating near
designated navigation channels, as well as operating near approaches to
local public boat ramps, private marinas and yacht clubs, and
waterfront businesses. The COTP Maryland-National Capital Region has
determined that potential hazards associated with the LA51 device
trainings would be a safety concern for anyone within the waterway
training areas. The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety
of vessels and the navigable waters within the waterway training areas
before, during, and after the training events. The proposed safety zone
waterway training areas would only be used to conduct LA51 device
training as needed for Coast Guard Law Enforcement training
requirements.
    The COTP Maryland-National Capital Region would only activate the
relevant safety zone(s) as needed. If the proposed safety zones were
established, the Coast Guard would continue to first seek to use a DOD-
controlled range, and check its availability for LA51 device training
use, prior to activating a Coast Guard waterway training area safety
zone. If these permanent Cost Guard waterway training area safety zones
were not established, the COTP Maryland-National Capital Region would
possibly need to establish multiple temporarily safety zones for LA51
training.
    The Coast Guard is proposing this rulemaking under authority in 46
U.S.C. 70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231).

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP Maryland-National Capital Region is proposing to establish
four safety zones for use as waterway training areas.
    Waterway training area Alpha includes all waters of the Patapsco
River encompassed by a line connecting the following points beginning
at 39[deg]14'07.98'' N, 076[deg]32'58.50'' W; thence to
39[deg]13'34.98'' N, 076[deg]32'24.00'' W; thence to 39[deg]13'22.50''
N, 076[deg]32'28.98'' W; thence to 39[deg]13'21.00'' N,
076[deg]33'12.00'' W; and back to the beginning point. Waterway
training area Alpha is located at the entrance to Curtis Bay, in
Baltimore Harbor Anchorage No. 5, at Baltimore, MD. The safety zone is
a trapezoid in shape measuring approximately 1,500 yards in length and
averaging 750 yards in width.
    Waterway training area Bravo includes all waters of the Chesapeake
Bay encompassed by a line connecting the following points beginning at
39[deg]05'25.98'' N, 076[deg]20'20.04'' W; thence to 39[deg]04'40.02''
N, 076[deg]19'28.98'' W; thence to 39[deg]02'45.00'' N,
076[deg]22'09.00'' W; thence to 39[deg]03'30.00'' N, 076[deg]23'00.00''
W; and back to the beginning point. Waterway training area Bravo is
located in the approaches to Baltimore Harbor, between Belvidere Shoal
and Kent Island, MD. The safety zone is a rectangle in shape situated
along a northeast-southwest axis, measuring approximately 4,500 yards
in length by 1,500 yards in width.
    Waterway training area Charlie includes all waters of the Potomac
River encompassed by a line connecting the following points beginning
at 38[deg]00'28.80'' N, 076[deg]22'43.80'' W; thence to
38[deg]01'18.00'' N, 076[deg]21'54.00'' W; thence to 38[deg]05'06.00''
N, 076[deg]27'43.20''

W; thence to 38[deg]04'40.20'' N, 076[deg]28'34.20'' W; and back to the
beginning point. Waterway training area Charlie is located between
Point Lookout, MD, and St. George Island, MD. The safety zone is a
rectangle in shape measuring approximately 12,500 yards in length by
1,500 yards in width.
    Waterway training area Delta includes all waters of the Potomac
River encompassed by a line connecting the following points beginning
at 38[deg]32'31.14'' N, 077[deg]15'29.82'' W; thence to
38[deg]32'48.18'' N, 077[deg]15'54.24'' W; thence to 38[deg]33'34.56''
N, 077[deg]15'07.20'' W; thence to 38[deg]33'15.06'' N,
077[deg]14'39.54'' W; and back to the beginning point. Waterway
training area Delta is located between Possum Point, VA, and Cockpit
Point, VA. The safety zone is a trapezoid in shape measuring
approximately 2,000 in length by 1,000 yards in width.
    Proposed waterway training areas Alpha and Bravo are located
outside designated navigation channels. Neither of these two zones are
near areas of the Patapsco River and Chesapeake Bay that are used
heavily by the boating public or popular fishing or diving sites.
Proposed waterway training areas Charlie and Delta are located within a
portion of navigable channels. Although these two zones are near areas
of the Potomac River that may be used by the boating public or popular
fishing or diving sites, vessels traffic in these areas would be able
to safely transit around the safety zones. The Coast Guard would ensure
that appropriate monitoring of the waterway while the safety zone is
activated.
    The Coast Guard anticipates that each of the four proposed safety
zones would be activated for two hours on six separate occasions
annually--a total of 12 annual enforcement hours for each zone. The
Coast Guard anticipates that it would activate the zones at various
times of the year during daylight hours only. Whenever a LA51 device
training event is planned, the COTP Maryland-National Capital Region
would notify the maritime community of the enforcement dates and times
of the appropriate safety zone as the training event dictates. Such
notification would be made by broadcast or local notice to mariners,
distribution in leaflet form, on-scene oral notice, or other
appropriate means in accordance with Sec.  [thinsp]165.7.
    The duration and enforcement of the zones is intended to ensure the
safety of vessels and these navigable waters before, during, and after
these training events. Except for training participants, no vessel or
person would be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP Maryland-National Capital Region or a
designated representative. The regulatory text we are proposing appears
at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
duration, and location of the safety zones. It is anticipated that each
of these four safety zones will be activated for six separate events
annually. Although vessel traffic may not be able to safely transit
around two of these safety zones while being enforced, both of which
are on the Potomac River, the impact would be for 2 hours or less and
such vessels would be able to seek permission to enter and transit
these safety zones by contacting the COTP Maryland-National Capital
Region or a designated representative by telephone or on VHF-FM channel
16. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners
via Marine Band Radio VHF-FM channel 16 about the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has

implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1
(series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves five
safety zones that, when activated, will last 48 enforcement hours
annually and prohibit entry within portions of the Patapsco River,
Chesapeake Bay, and Potomac River. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) in
Table 3-1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Implementing
Procedures 5090.1. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and
submissions in response to this document, see DHS's Correspondence
System of Records notice (84 FR 48645, September 26, 2018).
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.516 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.516  Safety Zones; Waterway Training Areas, Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region Zone.

    (a) Regulated areas. The following areas are established as safety
zones:
    (1) Waterway training area Alpha. All waters of the Patapsco River,
encompassed by a line connecting the following points beginning at
39[deg]14'07.98'' N, 076[deg]32'58.50'' W; thence to 39[deg]13'34.98''
N, 076[deg]32'24.00'' W; thence to 39[deg]13'22.50'' N,
076[deg]32'28.98'' W; thence to 39[deg]13'21.00'' N, 076[deg]33'12.00''
W; and back to the beginning point.
    (2) Waterway training area Bravo. All waters of the Chesapeake Bay,
encompassed by a line connecting the following points beginning at
39[deg]05'25.98'' N, 076[deg]20'20.04'' W; thence to 39[deg]04'40.02''
N, 076[deg]19'28.98'' W; thence to 39[deg]02'45.00'' N,
076[deg]22'09.00'' W; thence to 39[deg]03'30.00'' N, 076[deg]23'00.00''
W; and back to the beginning point.
    (3) Waterway training area Charlie. All waters of the Potomac
River, encompassed by a line connecting the following points beginning
at 38[deg]00'28.80'' N, 076[deg]22'43.80'' W; thence to
38[deg]01'18.00'' N, 076[deg]21'54.00'' W; thence to 38[deg]05'06.00''
N, 076[deg]27'43.20'' W; thence to 38[deg]04'40.20'' N,
076[deg]28'34.20'' W; and back to the beginning point.
    (4) Waterway training area Delta. All waters of the Potomac River,
encompassed by a line connecting the following points beginning at
38[deg]32'31.14'' N, 077[deg]15'29.82'' W; thence to 38[deg]32'48.18''
N, 077[deg]15'54.24'' W; thence to 38[deg]33'34.56'' N,
077[deg]15'07.20'' W; thence to 38[deg]33'15.06'' N, 077[deg]14'39.54''
W; and back to the beginning point.
    (5) These coordinates are based on Datum NAD 83.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section--
    Captain of the Port (COTP) means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
    Designated representative means a Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer designated by or assisting the COTP in the
enforcement of the safety zones.
    Training participant means a person or vessel authorized by the
COTP as participating in the training event or otherwise designated by
the COTP or the COTP's designated representative as having a function
tied to the training event.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zones described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
    (2) Except for training participants, all vessels underway within
this safety zone at the time it is activated are to depart the zone. To
seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative by telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER> or on Marine Band Radio
VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8

MHz). The Coast Guard vessels enforcing this section can be contacted
on Marine Band Radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Those in the safety
zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by
the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
    (3) The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.
    (d) Enforcement. The safety zones created by this section will be
enforced only upon issuance of a Broadcast Notice to Mariners (BNM) by
the COTP or the COTP's representative, as well as on-scene notice or
other appropriate means in accordance with Sec.  165.7.

    Dated: November 22, 2019.
Joseph B. Loring,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Maryland-National
Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2019-25853 Filed 11-27-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: May 11, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 90)]
[Notices]
[Page 26317-26318]
[DOCID:fr11my10-147]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary of Transportation

[DOT Docket No. DOT-OST-2010-0074]

The Future of Aviation Advisory Committee (FAAC); Notice of
Federal Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary of
Transportation.

ACTION: The Future of Aviation Advisory Committee (FAAC); Notice of
Federal Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary of
Transportation, announces the first meeting of the FAAC which will be
held in the Metropolitan Washington, DC area. This notice announces the
date, time and location of the meeting, which will be open to the
public. The purpose of FAAC is to provide advice and recommendations to
the Secretary of Transportation to ensure the competitiveness of the
U.S. aviation industry and its capability to manage effectively the
evolving transportation needs, challenges, and opportunities of the
global economy.

DATES: The meeting will be held on May 25, 2010, from 9:30 a.m. to 3:30
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the offices of the Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, on
the ground floor of the West Building Atrium located across the street
from the Navy Yard (Green Line) Metro station.
    Public Access: The meeting is open to the public. (See below for
registration instructions)
    Public Comments: Five priorities were identified by the aviation
industry as topics for the Federal Advisory Committee to consider in
discussing the future of the aviation Industry. These topics were
published in the Federal Advisory Charter at http://www.regulations.gov
(Docket DOT-OST-2010-0074). We request your comments on the five
topics. In order for the committee to read and consider your views and
question expeditiously, please include one of the following in the
subject line when making your e-mail submission; ``Financing'',
``Safety'', ``Environment'', ``workforce'', ``Competition'', and/or
``General comment''. Comments for the May 25 meeting must be received
by Wednesday, May 19. All public comments will be posted in Docket DOT-
OST-2010-0074, which is accessible from http://www.Regulations.gov.
Please note that even after the closing date, we will continue to
review public comments for future meetings.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    To carry out its duties, the advisory committee will meet on the
following dates this year:
     May 25
     July 14
     August 25
     October 20
     December 15
    Meetings of sub groups or work groups may occur more frequently.
    Members of the public may review the FAAC charter and minutes of
FAAC meetings at http://www.regulations.gov in docket number DOT-OST-
2010-0074 or the FAAC Web site at http://www.dot.gov/faac.

Registration

     Space is limited. Registration will be available on a
first-come, first-serve basis. Once the maximum number of 300
registrants has been reached, registration will close. All requests to
attend the FAAC must be received by close of business on Wednesday, May
19.
     All foreign nationals must provide their date of birth and
passport number by Monday, May 17.
     Persons with disabilities who require special assistance
should advise the Department at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>under the subject line of
``Special Assistance'' of their anticipated special needs as early as
possible.
     To register: Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>under the
subject line ``Registration'' with the following information:
     [cir] Last name, First name
     [cir] Title
     [cir] Company or affiliation
     [cir] Address
     [cir] Phone number
     [cir] E-mail address in order for us to confirm your registration
     The DOT Headquarters building is a secure Federal
building. All attendees will be escorted to and from the meeting area.
     Please inform us if you have protection detail that will
accompany you to the event.
     Due to security requirements, leaving the building is
discouraged.
     A continental breakfast will be available in the morning
(beginning at 7:30) for $5.00 (cash only)
     Lunch (beginning at 11:30) sandwich buffet will be
available onsite for $10.00 (cash only).
     No Automated Teller Machines are available at the meeting
site.
     An e-mail will be sent to you confirming your registration
along with details on security procedures for entering the U.S.
Department of Transportation building.
     Entering the U.S. Department of Transportation Building:
     [cir] A picture ID is required.
     [cir] Admission will be at the New Jersey Avenue entrance only.
     [cir] Registration is from 7:30 to 9 a.m.
     [cir] Only pre-registered attendees may attend the meeting.
     [cir] Attendees must be screened and pass through a metal
detector.
     [cir] No firearms are allowed in the building, including with
protection detail.
     [cir] Special accessibility requirements should be noted at time
of e-mail registration.
     [cir] There is no facility parking and parking at public parking
lots is extremely limited.

     [cir] For convenience, we recommend use of public transportation.
The Navy Yard metro stop on the Green Line (at M Street and New Jersey
Ave., SE.) is across the street from DOT's New Jersey Ave entrance.
There are several buses with stops nearby. See http://www.wmata.com for
more information on trip planning.
     The FAAC meeting will be broadcast on the Internet at
http://www.dot.gov/faac.
     There is no Internet access and laptop computers are
discouraged as additional security procedures are required.
    Public Comments: Public may provide comments to the FAAC on the
future of the aviation industry at http://www.regulations.gov (DOT-OST-
2010-0074) or at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please be sure to title your subject
line as follows:
     [cir] Comments on Financing: ``Financing''
     [cir] Comments on Safety: ``Safety''
     [cir] Comments on Competition: ``Competition''
     [cir] Comments on Environment: ``Environment''
     [cir] Comments on Labor: ``Labor''
     [cir] Comments on other topics: ``General Comments''
     [cir] To register for the meeting: ``Registration''
     [cir] To seek additional information: ``Further Information''
     [cir] To request special assistance for persons with disabilities:
``Special Assistance''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aloha Ley, Associate Director, Small
Community Development Program,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Issued on: May 6, 2010.
Ray LaHood,
Secretary of Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2010-11247 Filed 5-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60211-60212]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23700]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-73259; File No. SR-CME-2014-37]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Regarding Acceptance of a New Series of Credit Default Swap Index
Product

September 30, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder \2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 19, 2014, Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (``CME'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which
Items have been prepared primarily by CME. CME filed the proposal
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act,\3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(4)(ii)
\4\ thereunder, so that the proposal was effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(4)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    CME is filing proposed rules changes that are limited to its
business as a derivatives clearing organization. More specifically, the
proposed rule change involves CME's acceptance of a new credit default
swap index product series.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, CME included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. CME has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of these statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    CME is registered as a DCO with the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission and offers clearing services for many different futures and
swaps products, including certain credit default swap index products.
Currently, CME offers clearing of the Markit CDX North American
Investment Grade Index Series 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,
19, 20, 21 and 22. CME also offers clearing of the Markit CDX North
American High Yield Index Series 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,
20, 21 and 22.
    The proposed rule change would expand CME's Markit CDX North
American Investment Grade (``CDX IG'') Index and Markit CDX North
American High Yield (``CDX HY'') Index product offerings by
incorporating the upcoming Series 23 for both sets of index products.
    In addition to the changes to expand CME's CDX offering, CME also
proposes to remove from the current list of accepted CDX indices
certain products whose termination dates have passed. These products
are set forth in the following table:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Termination date
          CDX Index               Series        (scheduled termination
                                                         date)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CDX North American                         8  20 Jun 2014.
 Investment Grade
 (CDX.NA.IG).
CDX North American                        12  20 Jun 2014.
 Investment Grade
 (CDX.NA.IG).
CDX North American                        16  20 Jun 2014.
 Investment Grade
 (CDX.NA.IG).
CDX North American High                   12  20 Jun 2014.
 Yield (CDX.NA.HY).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Although these changes will be effective on filing, CME plans to
operationalize the proposed changes as follows: CDX IG 23 will become
available for clearing on September 22, 2014 and CDX HY 23 will become
available for clearing on September 29, 2014; provided that CME expects
market participants to begin clearing CDX IG 23 and CDX HY beginning
October 6, 2014 consistent with the ISDA protocol adopting the 2014
Credit Derivatives Definitions. The product deletions would be
effective immediately.
    The changes that are described in this filing are limited to CME's
business as a DCO clearing products under the exclusive jurisdiction of
the CFTC and do not materially impact CME's security-based swap
clearing business in any way. CME notes that it has also certified the
proposed rule change that is the subject of this filing to its primary
regulator, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC''), in a
separate filing, CME Submission 14-405. The text of the CME proposed
rule amendments is attached, with additions underlined and deletions in
brackets.
    CME believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Exchange Act, including Section 17A of the Exchange
Act.\5\ The proposed rule change would expand CME's CDX IG and CDX HY
product offerings by incorporating the upcoming Series 23 for both sets
of index products and would therefore provide investors with an
expanded range of derivatives products for clearing (and would also
remove certain products whose termination dates have passed). As such,
the proposed changes are designed to promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent
applicable, derivatives agreements, contracts, and transactions, to
assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the
custody or control of the clearing agency or for which it is
responsible, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Exchange Act.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Furthermore, the proposed changes are limited in their effect to
swaps products offered under CME's authority to act as a DCO. These
products are under the exclusive jurisdiction of the

CFTC. As such, the proposed CME changes are limited to CME's activities
as a DCO clearing swaps that are not security-based swaps; CME notes
that the policies of the CFTC with respect to administering the
Commodity Exchange Act are comparable to a number of the policies
underlying the Exchange Act, such as promoting market transparency for
over-the-counter derivatives markets, promoting the prompt and accurate
clearance of transactions and protecting investors and the public
interest.
    Because the proposed changes are limited in their effect to swaps
products offered under CME's authority to act as a DCO, the proposed
changes are properly classified as effecting a change in an existing
service of CME that:
    (a) Primarily affects the clearing operations of CME with respect
to products that are not securities, including futures that are not
security futures, and swaps that are not security-based swaps or mixed
swaps; and
    (b) does not significantly affect any securities clearing
operations of CME or any rights or obligations of CME with respect to
securities clearing or persons using such securities-clearing service.
    As such, the changes are therefore consistent with the requirements
of Section 17A of the Exchange Act \7\ and are properly filed under
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \8\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(4)(ii) \9\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(4)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CME does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any
impact, or impose any burden, on competition. The rule change simply
facilitates the offering of two new series of credit default swap index
products.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    CME has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, comments
regarding this proposed rule change. CME has not received any
unsolicited written comments from interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective upon filing pursuant
to Section 19(b)(3)(A)\10\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(4)(ii) \11\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(4)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CME-2014-37 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CME-2014-37. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filings will also be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of CME and on CME's
Web site at http://www.cmegroup.com/market-regulation/rule-filings.html.
    All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CME-2014-37
and should be submitted on or before October 27, 2014.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-23700 Filed 10-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P