[Federal Register: June 30, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 126)]
[Notices]
[Page 36857-36858]
[DOCID:fr30jn08-59]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings  1

June 23, 2008.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER03-345-011.
    Applicants: New England Power Pool Participants Committee.
    Description: ISO New England Inc submits its semi-annual status
report on Load Response Programs.
    Filed Date: 06/18/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080619-0114.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 09, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1097-004.
    Applicants: BJ Energy LLC.
    Description: BJ Energy, LLC submits an updated market power
analysis, and request for determination of Category 1 Seller Status
pursuant to Order 697 and 697-A.
    Filed Date: 06/18/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080620-0010.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 09, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1069-000.
    Applicants: Happy Jack Windpower, LLC.
    Description: Application of Happy Jack Windpower, LLC for Market-
Based Rate Authority.
    Filed Date: 06/18/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080620-0083.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 09, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1120-000.
    Applicants: Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company.
    Description: Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company submits its
Information Filing of 2008 Formula Rate Annual Update.
    Filed Date: 05/15/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080515-5103.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 02, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1140-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Co submits Second Revised
Sheet 19 et al to First Revised Rate Schedule 466 to the Second Amended
and Restated 33 kV Added Facilities Agreement with Southern California
Water Co.
    Filed Date: 06/19/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080620-0011.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 10, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1141-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of New Mexico.
    Description: Public Service Company of New Mexico submits Service
Agreement 291 under the PNM OATT for 25 MW of capacity etc with
Aragonne Wind, LLC.
    Filed Date: 06/19/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080620-0012.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 10, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1142-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company submits an amended
letter agreement with PPM Energy, Inc.
    Filed Date: 06/19/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080620-0013.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 10, 2008.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following open access
transmission tariff filings:
    Docket Numbers: OA07-91-001.
    Applicants: Xcel Energy Services Inc.
    Description: Order No. 890 OATT Filing of Xcel Energy Services Inc.
in response to letter Order of FERC issued May 20, 2008.
    Filed Date: 06/19/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080619-5057.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 10, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: OA08-52-001.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: New York Independent System Operator, Inc et al
submits additional revisions to Attachment Y etc in compliance with
Order 890.
    Filed Date: 06/18/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080620-0085.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 09, 2008.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.

    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-14790 Filed 6-27-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 80 (Friday, April 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23022-23023]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09398]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 0-2, Form ADV-NR; OMB Control No. 3235-0240, SEC File No.
270-214.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for extension of the previously approved
collection of information discussed below.
    The title for the collection of information is ``Rule 0-2 and Form
ADV-NR under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.'' Rule 0-2 and Form
ADV-NR facilitate service of process to non-resident investment
advisers and their non-resident general partners or non-resident
managing agents. The Form requires these persons to designate the
Commission as agent for service of process. The purpose of this
collection of information is to enable the commencement of legal and or
regulatory actions against investment advisers that are doing business
in the United States, but are not residents.
    The respondents to this information collection would be each non-
resident general partner or non-resident managing agent of an SEC-
registered adviser and of an exempt reporting adviser. The Commission
has estimated that compliance with the requirement to complete Form
ADV-NR imposes a total burden of approximately 1.0 hour for an adviser.
Based on our experience with these filings, we estimate that we will
receive 47 Form ADV-NR filings annually. Based on the 1.0 hour per
respondent estimate, the Commission staff estimates a total annual
burden of 47 hours for this collection of information.
    Rule 0-2 and Form ADV-NR do not require recordkeeping or records
retention. The collection of information requirements under the rule
and form is mandatory. The information collected pursuant to the rule
and Form ADV-NR is a filing with the Commission. This filing is not
kept confidential and must be preserved until at least three years
after termination of the enterprise. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this
information collection at the following Web site, www.reginfo.gov.
Please direct general comments regarding the above information to the
following persons: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Thomas Bayer, Chief Information Officer,
Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549 or send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: April 21, 2014.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-09398 Filed 4-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Dear Mr. Zeller:

I am writing as an individual consumer to request an extension of the comment period for the Food and Drug Administration's ("FDA") Proposed Rule Deeming Tobacco Products to be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking and Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the "Proposed Rule") published at 79 Fed. Reg. 23,142 and Federal Register No. 2014-09491. On behalf of myself, I am requesting that the comment period for the Proposed Rule be extended by the FDA for an additional 105 days, from its current 75-day period, to 180 days.

The Proposed Rule raises a number of significant issues and questions that are important and relevant to me, as a consumer of products that are proposed for regulation under the Proposed Rule. The Proposed Rule asks about a hundred different questions I might want to respond to. I want to provide my thoughts and comments on many of these issues, but my time to devote to researching and providing thoughtful comments on these important questions is limited. I have already spent many hours researching and dissecting these issues, but they take time. I know that the FDA took many years to even come up with the Proposed Rule, so I do not think it is at all unreasonable to allow the public a mere six months to comment on it. This is our only opportunity, as consumers, to provide our feedback.

I feel very strongly about e-cigarettes as an alternative to combustible cigarettes. E-cigarettes offered me a way to quite smoking that no other “conventional” method or drug could accomplish.  I would like to share my personal story but would require the adequate time to do so.  I realize that the FDA has the authority under 21 CFR 10.40 to extend this time frame and that the FDA has exercised this authority on numerous occasions in the past. I would therefore ask that you do so here, so that all consumers and businesses have ample opportunity to provide their comments on this proposed regulation.

I appreciate your consideration of my request and am happy to discuss this issue with you further.

Sincerely,

Carlos J Spizzirri


[Federal Register: November 10, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 217)]
[Notices]
[Page 68433]
[DOCID:fr10no05-106]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL06-14-000]

Entergy Services, Inc., Complainant v. Union Power Partners, L.P.
Respondent; Notice of Complaint

November 2, 2005.
    Take notice that on October 28, 2005, Entergy Services, Inc., on
behalf of itself and Entergy Arkansas, Inc. (Entergy), filed a
complaint against Union Power Partners, L.P. (UPP) pursuant to section
206 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824e, and Rule 206 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206. Entergy
requests the Commission to issue an order prohibiting UPP from charging
Entergy as of November 1, 2005 for reactive power provided from UPP
generation within a specified dead band.
    Entergy states that copies of the complaint were served on the
contacts for UPP as listed on the Commission's list of corporate
officials.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all parties to this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on November 17, 2005.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-6184 Filed 11-9-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: September 2, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 169)]
[Notices]
[Page 45487-45492]
[DOCID:fr02se09-90]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. IC-28890; File No. 812-13584]

Jackson National Life Insurance Company, et al.

August 27, 2009.
AGENCY: The Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').

ACTION: Notice of application for an order under Section 6(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') granting exemptions from
the provisions of Sections 2(a)(32), 22(c) and 27(i)(2)(A) of the Act
and Rule 22c-1 thereunder to permit the recapture of contract
enhancements applied to purchase payments made under certain deferred
variable annuity contracts.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Applicants: Jackson National Life Insurance Company (``Jackson
National''), Jackson National Separate Account--I (the ``JNL Separate
Account''), and Jackson National Life Distributors LLC
(``Distributor,'' and collectively, ``Applicants'').

SUMMARY:  Summary of Application: Applicants seek an order under
Section 6(c) of the Act to exempt certain transactions from the
provisions of Sections 2(a)(32), 22(c), and 27(i)(2)(A) of the Act and
Rule 22c-1 thereunder, to the extent necessary to permit the recapture,
under specified circumstances, of certain contract enhancements applied
to purchase payments made under the deferred variable annuity contracts
described in the application that Jackson National has issued \1\ and
will issue through the JNL Separate Account (the ``Contracts'') as well
as other contracts that Jackson National may issue in the future
through its existing or future separate accounts (``Other Accounts'')
that are substantially similar in all material respects to the
Contracts (``Future Contracts''). Applicants also request that the
order being sought extend to any other Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority (``FINRA'') member broker-dealer controlling or controlled
by, or under common control with, Jackson National, whether existing or
created in the future, that serves as distributor or principal
underwriter for the Contracts or Future Contracts (``Affiliated Broker-
Dealers'') and any successors in interest to the Applicants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The existing contract referred to in the application is
registered under the Securities Act of 1933 File No. 333-155675.

DATES:  Filing Date: The application was filed on October 9, 2008, and
amended on February 10, 2009, April 23, 2009, and August 26, 2009.
    Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the
application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Secretary of
the Commission and serving Applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the
Commission by 5:30 p.m. on September 21, 2009, and should be
accompanied by proof of service on Applicants, in the form of an
affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing requests
should state the nature of the writer's interest, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested. Persons may request notification of
a hearing by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. Applicants: c/o Jackson National Life
Insurance Company, Attn: Joan E. Boros, Esq., Jorden Burt LLP, 1025
Thomas Jefferson Street, NW., Suite 400 East, Washington, DC 20007-
5208; copies to Anthony L. Dowling, Esq., Jackson National Life
Insurance Company, 1 Corporate Way, Lansing, Michigan 48951.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen J. Sazzman, Senior Counsel, at
(202) 551-6762, or Harry Eisenstein, Branch Chief, at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
Office of Insurance Products, Division of Investment Management.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's Web site by searching for the file number, or an applicant
using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or
by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Applicants' Representations

    1. Jackson National is a stock life insurance company organized
under the laws of the State of Michigan in June 1961. Its legal
domicile and principal business address is 1 Corporate Way, Lansing,
Michigan 48951. Jackson National is admitted to conduct life insurance
and annuity business in the District of Columbia and all States except
New York. Jackson National is ultimately a wholly owned subsidiary of
Prudential plc (London, England).
    2. The JNL Separate Account was established by Jackson National on
June 14, 1993, pursuant to the provisions of Michigan law and the
authority granted under a resolution of Jackson National's Board of
Directors. Jackson National is the depositor of the JNL Separate
Account. The JNL Separate Account meets the definition of a ``separate
account'' under the Federal securities laws and is registered with the
Commission as a unit investment trust under the Act (File No. 811-
8664). The JNL Separate Account will fund the variable benefits
available under the Contracts. The registration statement relating to
the offering of the Contracts was filed under the Securities Act of
1933 (the ``1933 Act'').
    3. The Distributor is a wholly owned subsidiary of Jackson National
and serves as the distributor of the Contracts. The Distributor is
registered with the Commission as a broker-dealer under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``1934 Act'') and is a member of FINRA. The
Distributor enters into selling group agreements with affiliated and
unaffiliated broker-dealers. The Contracts are sold by licensed
insurance agents, where the Contracts may be

lawfully sold, who are registered representatives of broker-dealers
that are registered under the 1934 Act and are members of FINRA.
    4. The Contracts require a minimum initial premium payment of
$5,000 or $10,000 under most circumstances depending on the contract
($2,000 for a qualified plan contract). Subsequent payments may be made
at any time during the accumulation phase but before the contract
anniversary after the owner's 85th birthday. Each subsequent payment
must be at least $500 ($50 under an automatic payment plan). Prior
approval of Jackson National is required for aggregate premium payments
of over $1,000,000.
    5. The Contracts permit owners to accumulate contract values on a
fixed basis through allocations to one of six fixed accounts (the
``Fixed Accounts''), including four ``Fixed Account Options'' which
offer guaranteed crediting rates for specified periods of time
(currently, 1, 3, 5, or 7 years), and two ``DCA+ Fixed Account
Options'' (used in connection with dollar cost averaging transfers,
each of which from time to time offers special crediting rates). In
addition, if certain optional guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits
are elected, automatic transfers of an owner's contract value may be
allocated to a ``Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefit (`GMWB') Fixed
Account.'' The GMWB Fixed Account also offers a guaranteed crediting
rate for a specified period.
    6. The Contracts also permit owners to accumulate contract values
on a variable basis, through allocations to one or more of the
investment divisions of the JNL Separate Account (the ``Investment
Divisions,'' collectively with the Fixed Account and the GMWB Fixed
Account, the ``Allocation Options''). Under most of the Contracts, 93
Investment Divisions currently are expected to be offered but
additional Investment Divisions may be offered in the future and some
could be eliminated or combined with other Investment Divisions in the
future. Similarly, Future Contracts may offer additional or different
Investment Divisions.
    7. Transfers among the Investment Divisions are permitted. The
first 15 transfers in a contract year are free; subsequent transfers
cost $25. Certain transfers to, from and among the Fixed Account
Options are also permitted during the Contracts' accumulation phase,
but are subject to certain adjustments and limitations. Dollar cost
averaging and rebalancing transfers are offered at no charge and do not
count against the 15 free transfers permitted each year. If certain
optional guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits are elected, automatic
transfers may be required to and from the GMWB Fixed Account according
to non-discretionary formulas. These automatic transfers also do not
count against the 15 free transfers permitted each year and are without
charge.
    8. If the owner dies during the accumulation phase of the
Contracts, the beneficiary named by the owner is paid a death benefit
by Jackson National. The Contracts' base death benefit, which applies
unless an optional death benefit has been elected, is a payment to the
beneficiary of the greater of: (i) Contract value on the date Jackson
National receives proof of death and completed claim forms from the
beneficiary or (ii) the total premiums paid under that Contract minus
any prior withdrawals (including any withdrawal charges, recapture
charges, or other charges or adjustments to such withdrawals).
    9. The owner may also be offered certain optional endorsements (for
fees described in the application) that can change the death benefit
paid to the beneficiary. First, an ``Earnings Protection Benefit
Endorsement'' generally would add to the death benefit otherwise
payable an amount equal to a specified percentage (that varies with the
owner's age at issue) of earnings under the Contract up to a cap of
250% of remaining premiums (premiums not previously withdrawn).
    10. Second, the owner of a Contract may be offered six optional
death benefits (State variations may apply) that would replace the base
death benefit. The optional death benefits include: (i) A 5% Roll-Up
death benefit, (ii) a 6% Roll-Up death benefit, (iii) a Highest
Quarterly Anniversary Value death benefit, (iv) a Combination 5% Roll-
Up and Highest Quarterly Anniversary Value death benefit, (v) a
Combination 6% Roll-Up and Highest Quarterly Anniversary Value death
benefit, and (vi) a death benefit available in conjunction with the
purchase of the LifeGuard Freedom Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal
Benefit.
    11. The Contracts offer fixed and variable versions of the
following four types of annuity payment or ``income payment'': life
income, joint and survivor, life annuity with 120 or 240 monthly
payments guaranteed to be paid (although not guaranteed as to amount if
variable), and income for a specified period of 5 to 30 years. Jackson
National may also offer other income payment options. The Contracts may
also offer an optional Guaranteed Minimum Income Benefit (``GMIB'')
endorsement.
    12. In addition to the Earnings Protection Benefit, GMIB, and
optional death benefit endorsements described above, there are nine
different Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefit (``GMWB'') optional
endorsements. Three variations of the GMWB allow, subject to specific
conditions, partial withdrawals prior to the income date that, in
total, equal the benefit's Guaranteed Withdrawal Balance (``GWB''). The
guarantee is effective if gross partial withdrawals taken within any
one contract year do not exceed a specified percentage of the GWB. Six
variations of the GMWB generally allow, subject to specific conditions,
partial withdrawals prior to the income date for the longer of the
duration of the owner's life or until total periodic withdrawals equal
the GWB.
    13. Jackson National will add an additional amount to the owner's
contract value (a ``Contract Enhancement'') for the initial premium
payment, and for each subsequent premium payment received prior to the
first contract anniversary following the owner's 85th birthday. Premium
payments will not be accepted on or after the first contract
anniversary following the owner's 85th birthday. If the owner is age 85
at issue, premium payments will not be accepted on or after the first
contract anniversary. All Contract Enhancements are paid from Jackson
National's general account assets. The Contract Enhancement is equal to
6% of the premium payment if the adjusted premium, as defined below, is
less than $100,000 at the time the premium payment is received. The
Contract Enhancement is equal to 8% of the premium payments if adjusted
premium is greater than or equal to $100,000 at the time the premium
payment is received. The adjusted premium is determined at the time
each premium payment is processed and is equal to (a) the sum of all
premium payments processed prior to the receipt of the current premium
payment plus the current premium payment less (b) the sum of all
partial withdrawals processed prior to the receipt of the current
premium payment (including any applicable withdrawal charges, recapture
charges and other charges or adjustments to such withdrawals).
    14. During the first contract year only, at the time that a
subsequent premium payment is received that causes the adjusted premium
to equal or exceed $100,000 when it was less than $100,000 before the
receipt of the premium payment, a retroactive Contract Enhancement will
be added to

the contract value equal to 2% of each previous premium payment for
which a 6% Contract Enhancement was credited and for which no 2%
retroactive Contract Enhancement has already been added. The Contract
Enhancement will be applied as of the date of the subsequent premium
payment and there will be no adjustments to previous contract values.
For example, if the initial premium payment is equal to $50,000, then
the initial adjusted premium is equal to $50,000 and the Contract
Enhancement credited to the contract value is equal to 6% (since the
adjusted premium is less than $100,000) of the initial premium payment
(.06*$50,000 = $3,000). If a withdrawal equal to $25,000 is taken at
the end of the third contract month and a premium payment equal to
$75,000 is made at the end of the sixth contract month, then the
adjusted premium at the time the $75,000 subsequent premium payment is
received is equal to the initial premium less the withdrawal plus the
subsequent premium payment ($50,000 - $25,000 + $75,000 = $100,000).
The Contract Enhancement credited to the contract value at the time of
the subsequent premium payment is equal to 8% (since the adjusted
premium is equal to or greater than $100,000) of the subsequent premium
payment plus the retroactive Contract Enhancement of 2% of the initial
premium payment (.08*$75,000 + .02*$50,000 = $7,000).
    15. Jackson National will recapture all or a portion of any
Contract Enhancements by imposing a recapture charge whenever an owner:
(i) Makes a total withdrawal within the recapture charge period (nine
years after a premium payment) or a partial withdrawal of corresponding
premiums within the recapture charge period in excess of those
permitted under the Contracts' free withdrawal provision unless the
withdrawal is made for certain health-related emergencies specified in
the Contracts; (ii) elects to receive payments under an income payment
option within the recapture charge period; or (iii) returns the
Contract during the free-look period.
    16. The amount of the recapture charge varies, depending upon when
the charge is imposed, as follows:

                                                          Contract Enhancement Recapture Charge
                                                          [As a percentage of premium payments]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Completed Years Since Receipt of Premium......................      0-1      1-2      2-3      3-4      4-5      5-6      6-7      7-8      8-9       9+
Recapture Charge..............................................       6%    5.50%    4.50%       4%    3.50%       3%       2%       1%     .50%       0%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The above specified recapture charge percentages apply in all
circumstances, whether the Contract Enhancement is 6% at the time of
the premium payment, or includes the additional 2%. Therefore, the
recapture charge percentage is not higher for premium payments that
receive the 8% Contract Enhancement than those that receive the 6%
Contract Enhancement. For example, if the initial premium is $50,000
and the Contract Enhancement credited to the contract value is 6% of
$50,000 (.06*$50,000 = $3,000), the recapture charge applied when the
initial premium is withdrawn after the free-look period but within the
first Completed Year is 6% of $50,000 (.06*$50,000 = $3,000). If the
initial premium is $100,000 and the Contract Enhancement credited to
the contract value is 8% of $100,000 (.08*$100,000 = $8,000), the
recapture charge applied when the initial premium is withdrawn is 6% of
$100,000 (.06*$100,000 = $6,000).
    17. A ``Completed Year'' is the succeeding twelve months from the
date on which Jackson National receives a premium payment. The first
Contract anniversary begins Completed Year 1-2 and each successive
Completed Year begins with the Contract anniversary of the preceding
Contract year.
    18. The recapture charge percentage will be applied to the
corresponding premium reflected in the amount withdrawn or the amount
applied to income payments that remain subject to a recapture charge.
The amount recaptured will be taken from the Investment Divisions and
the Fixed Account (and the GMWB Fixed Account, if applicable) in the
proportion their respective values bear to the contract value. The
dollar amount recaptured will never exceed the dollar amount of the
Contract Enhancement added to the contract. Recapture charges will be
applied upon electing to commence income payments, even in a situation
where the withdrawal charge is waived.
    19. Jackson National does not assess the recapture charge on any
payments paid out as: Death benefits; withdrawals of earnings;
withdrawals taken under the free withdrawal provision, which allows for
free withdrawals up to 10% of remaining premium, less earnings;
withdrawals necessary to satisfy the required minimum distribution of
the Internal Revenue Code (if the withdrawal requested exceeds the
required minimum distribution, the recapture charge will not be waived
on the required minimum distribution); if permitted by the owner's
State, withdrawals of up to $250,000 from the JNL Separate Account, the
Fixed Account or the GMWB Fixed Account in connection with the owner's
terminal illness or if the owner needs extended hospital or nursing
home care as provided in the Contract; or if permitted by the owner's
State, withdrawals of up to 25% (12.5% for each of two joint owners) of
contract value from the JNL Separate Account, the Fixed Account or the
GMWB Fixed Account in connection with certain serious medical
conditions specified in the Contract.
    20. The contract value will reflect any gains or losses
attributable to a Contract Enhancement described above. For purposes of
determining the recapture charge and withdrawal charge, withdrawals
will be allocated first to earnings, if any (which may be withdrawn
free of any recapture charge and withdrawal charge), second to premium
on a first-in, first-out basis, so that all withdrawals are allocated
to premium to which the lowest (if any) withdrawal charges and
recapture charges apply, and third to Contract Enhancements. For all
purposes, other than for tax purposes and the calculation of the
Earnings Protection Benefit, earnings are defined to be the excess, if
any, of the contract value over the sum of remaining Contract
Enhancements (the total Contract Enhancements, reduced by withdrawals
of Contract Enhancements) and remaining premiums (the total premium,
reduced by withdrawals that incur withdrawal charges and/or recapture
charges, and withdrawals of premiums that are no longer subject to
withdrawal charges and/or recapture charges). Contract Enhancements and
any gains or losses attributable to a Contract Enhancement will be
considered earnings under the Contract for tax purposes and the
calculation of the Earnings Protection Benefit.
    21. The Contracts have a ``free-look'' period of ten days after the
owner receives the Contract (or any longer

period required by State law). Contract value (or premiums paid, as may
be required by State law), less the full amount of any Contract
Enhancement(s) is returned upon exercise of free look rights by an
owner. Therefore, 100% of the Contract Enhancement will be recaptured
under all circumstances if an owner returns the Contract during the
free-look period, but any gain or loss on investments of the Contract
Enhancement would be retained by the owner. The dollar amount
recaptured will never exceed the dollar amount of the Contract
Enhancement added to the contract. A withdrawal charge will not be
assessed upon exercise of free look rights.
    22. The JNL Separate Account consists of sub-accounts, each of
which will be available under the JNL Separate Account. The sub-
accounts are referred to as ``Investment Divisions.'' The JNL Separate
Account currently consists of 93 Investment Divisions. Each Investment
Division will invest in shares of a corresponding series (``Series'')
of JNL Series Trust (``Trust'') or JNL Variable Fund LLC (``Fund'')
(collectively the ``Trust and Fund''). Not all Investment Divisions may
be available. The Trust and Fund are open-end management investment
companies registered under the Act and its shares are registered under
the 1933 Act. Jackson National Asset Management, LLC (``JNAM'') serves
as the investment adviser for all of the Series of the Trust and Fund.
JNAM has retained sub-advisers for each Series. Jackson National, at a
later date, may determine to create additional Investment Divisions of
the JNL Separate Account to invest in any additional Series, or other
such underlying portfolios or other investments as may now or in the
future be available. Similarly, Investment Division(s) of the JNL
Separate Account may be combined or eliminated from time to time. Any
changes to the Investment Divisions offered will be effected in
compliance with the terms of the Contracts and with applicable State
and Federal laws.
    23. In addition to the Contract Enhancement recapture charges, the
Contracts may have the following charges: mortality and expense risk
charge of 1.65% (as an annual percentage of average daily account
value); administration charge of 0.15% (as an annual percentage of
average daily account value); contract maintenance charge of $35 per
year (waived if contract value is $50,000 or more at the time the
charge is imposed); Earnings Protection Benefit charge of 0.30% (as an
annual percentage of daily account value--only applies if related
optional endorsement is elected); GMIB charge of 0.85% per year
(0.2125% per quarter) of the ``GMIB Benefit Base'' (as defined in the
application); GMWB charge ranging from 0.45% to 1.85% per year (0.1125%
to 0.4650% per quarter) of the ``Guaranteed Withdrawal Balance'' (as
defined in the application), depending upon age at election and upon
which (if any) GMWB endorsement is elected; optional death benefit
charge ranging from 0.30% to 1.80% per year (0.0750% to 0.4500% per
quarter) of the ``GMDB Benefit Base'' (as defined in the application),
depending upon which (if any) optional death benefit endorsement is
elected; transfer fee of $25 for each transfer in excess of 15 in a
contract year (for purposes of which dollar cost averaging and
rebalancing transfers are excluded); commutation fee that applies only
upon withdrawals from income payments for a fixed period, measured by
the difference in values paid upon such a withdrawal due to using a
discount rate of 1% greater than the assumed investment rate used in
computing the amounts of income payments; and a withdrawal charge that
applies to total withdrawals, partial withdrawals in excess of amounts
permitted to be withdrawn under the Contract's free withdrawal
provision and on the income date (the date income payments commence) if
the income date is within a year of the date the Contract was issued.
    24. The withdrawal charges shown in the table below apply to the
Contracts and Future Contracts. The amount of the withdrawal charge
depends upon the contribution year of the premium withdrawn as follows:

                                                                    Withdrawal Charge
                                                          [As a percentage of premium payments]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Completed Years Since Receipt of Premium......................        0        1        2        3        4        5        6        7        8       9+
Withdrawal Charge.............................................     7.5%       7%       6%    5.50%       5%       4%       3%       2%       1%        0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    25. Jackson National does not assess the withdrawal charge on any
payments paid out as: Death benefits; election to begin income payments
after the first contract year; cancellation of the Contract upon
exercise of free look rights by an owner; withdrawals of earnings;
withdrawals taken under the free withdrawal provision, which allows for
free withdrawals up to 10% of remaining premium, less earnings;
withdrawals necessary to satisfy the required minimum distribution of
the Internal Revenue Code (if the withdrawal requested exceeds the
required minimum distribution, the withdrawal charge will not be waived
on the required minimum distribution); if permitted by the owner's
State, withdrawals of up to $250,000 from the Investment Divisions,
Fixed Account or GMWB Fixed Account of the Contracts in connection with
the terminal illness of the owner of a Contract, or in connection with
extended hospital or nursing home care for the owner; and if permitted
by the owner's State, withdrawals of up to 25% (12.5% each for two
joint owners) of contract value from the Investment Divisions, Fixed
Account or GMWB Fixed Account of the Contracts in connection with
certain serious medical conditions specified in the Contract.

Applicants' Legal Analysis

    1. Applicants state that Section 6(c) of the Act authorizes the
Commission to exempt any person, security or transaction, or any class
or classes of persons, securities or transactions from the provisions
of the Act and the rules promulgated thereunder if and to the extent
that such exemption is necessary or appropriate in the public interest
and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of the Act. Applicants request
that the Commission, pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Act, grant the
exemptions requested below with respect to the Contracts and any Future
Contracts funded by the JNL Separate Account or Other Accounts that are
issued by Jackson National and underwritten or distributed by the
Distributor or Affiliated Broker-Dealers. Applicants undertake that
Future Contracts funded by the JNL Separate Account or Other Accounts,
in the future, will be substantially similar in all material respects
to the Contracts. Applicants believe that the requested exemptions are
appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection
of investors and the purposes

fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act.
    2. Applicants state that Subsection (i) of Section 27 of the Act
provides that Section 27 does not apply to any registered separate
account funding variable insurance contracts, or to the sponsoring
insurance company and principal underwriter of such account, except as
provided in paragraph (2) of the subsection. Paragraph (2) provides
that it shall be unlawful for such a separate account or sponsoring
insurance company to sell a contract funded by the registered separate
account unless such contract is a redeemable security. Section 2(a)(32)
defines ``redeemable security'' as any security, other than short-term
paper, under the terms of which the holder, upon presentation to the
issuer, is entitled to receive approximately his proportionate share of
the issuer's current net assets, or the cash equivalent thereof.
    3. Applicants submit that the recapture of the Contract Enhancement
in the circumstances set forth in its application would not deprive an
owner of his or her proportionate share of the issuer's current net
assets. A Contract owner's interest in the amount of the Contract
Enhancement allocated to his or her contract value upon receipt of a
premium payment is not fully vested until nine complete years following
a premium payment. Until or unless the amount of any Contract
Enhancement is vested, Jackson National retains the right and interest
in the Contract Enhancement amount, although not in the earnings
attributable to that amount. Thus, Applicants urge that when Jackson
National recaptures any Contract Enhancement it is simply retrieving
its own assets, and because a Contract owner's interest in the Contract
Enhancement is not vested, the Contract owner has not been deprived of
a proportionate share of the JNL Separate Account's assets, i.e., a
share of the JNL Separate Account's assets proportionate to the
Contract owner's contract value.
    4. In addition, Applicants represent that it would be patently
unfair to allow a Contract owner exercising the free-look privilege to
retain the Contract Enhancement amount under a Contract that has been
returned for a refund after a period of only a few days. If Jackson
National could not recapture the Contract Enhancement, individuals
could purchase a Contract with no intention of retaining it and simply
return it for a quick profit. Furthermore, Applicants state that the
recapture of the Contract Enhancement relating to withdrawals and to
income payments within the first nine years of a premium contribution
is designed to protect Jackson National against Contract owners not
holding the Contract for a sufficient time period. It provides Jackson
National with sufficient time to recover the cost of the Contract
Enhancement, and to avoid the financial detriment that would result
from a shorter recapture period.
    5. Applicants represent that it is not administratively feasible to
track the Contract Enhancement amount in the JNL Separate Account after
the Contract Enhancement(s) is applied. Accordingly, the asset-based
charges applicable to the JNL Separate Account will be assessed against
the entire amounts held in the JNL Separate Account, including any
Contract Enhancement amounts. As a result, the aggregate asset-based
charges assessed will be higher than those that would be charged if the
Contract owner's contract value did not include any Contract
Enhancement.
    6. Applicants submit that the provisions for recapture of any
Contract Enhancement under the Contracts do not violate Sections
2(a)(32) and 27(i)(2)(A) of the Act. Sections 26(e) and 27(i) were
added to the Act to implement the purposes of the National Securities
Markets Improvement Act of 1996 and Congressional intent. The
application of a Contract Enhancement to premium payments made under
the Contracts should not raise any questions as to compliance by
Jackson National with the provisions of Section 27(i). However, to
avoid any uncertainty as to full compliance with the Act, Applicants
request an order providing exemption from Sections 2(a)(32) and
27(i)(2)(A), to the extent deemed necessary, to permit the recapture of
the Contract Enhancements, under the circumstances described herein and
in the Application, without the loss of relief from Section 27 provided
by Section 27(i).
    7. Applicants state that Section 22(c) of the Act authorizes the
Commission to make rules and regulations applicable to registered
investment companies and to principal underwriters of, and dealers in,
the redeemable securities of any registered investment company to
accomplish the same purposes as contemplated by Section 22(a). Rule
22c-1 under the Act prohibits a registered investment company issuing
any redeemable security, a person designated in such issuer's
prospectus as authorized to consummate transactions in any such
security, and a principal underwriter of, or dealer in, such security,
from selling, redeeming, or repurchasing any such security except at a
price based on the current net asset value of such security which is
next computed after receipt of a tender of such security for redemption
or of an order to purchase or sell such security.
    8. Applicants state that it is possible that someone might view
Jackson National's recapture of the Contract Enhancements as resulting
in the redemption of redeemable securities for a price other than one
based on the current net asset value of the JNL Separate Account.
Applicants contend, however, that the recapture of the Contract
Enhancement does not violate Rule 22c-1. The recapture of some or all
of the Contract Enhancement does not involve either of the evils that
Section 22(c) and Rule 22c-1 were intended to eliminate or reduce as
far as reasonably practicable, namely: (i) The dilution of the value of
outstanding redeemable securities of registered investment companies
through their sale at a price below net asset value or repurchase at a
price above it, and (ii) other unfair results, including speculative
trading practices. To effect a recapture of a Contract Enhancement,
Jackson National will redeem interests in a Contract owner's contract
value at a price determined on the basis of the current net asset value
of the JNL Separate Account. The amount recaptured will be less than or
equal to the amount of the Contract Enhancement that Jackson National
paid out of its general account assets. Although Contract owners will
be entitled to retain any investment gains attributable to the Contract
Enhancement and to bear any investment losses attributable to the
Contract Enhancement, the amount of such gains or losses will be
determined on the basis of the current net asset values of the JNL
Separate Account. Thus, no dilution will occur upon the recapture of
the Contract Enhancement. Applicants also submit that the second harm
that Rule 22c-1 was designed to address, namely, speculative trading
practices calculated to take advantage of backward pricing, will not
occur as a result of the recapture of the Contract Enhancement. Because
neither of the harms that Rule 22c-1 was meant to address is found in
the recapture of the Contract Enhancement, Rule 22c-1 should not apply
to any Contract Enhancement. However, to avoid any uncertainty as to
full compliance with Rule 22c-1, Applicants request an order granting
an exemption from the provisions of Rule 22c-1 to the extent deemed
necessary to permit them to recapture the Contract Enhancement under
the Contracts.

    9. Applicants submit that extending the requested relief to
encompass Future Contracts and Other Accounts is appropriate in the
public interest because it promotes competitiveness in the variable
annuity market by eliminating the need to file redundant exemptive
applications prior to introducing new variable annuity contracts.
Investors would receive no benefit or additional protection by
requiring Applicants to repeatedly seek exemptive relief that would
present no issues under the Act not already addressed in the
application.
    10. Applicants submit, for the reasons stated herein, that their
exemptive request meets the standards set out in Section 6(c) of the
Act, namely, that the exemptions requested are appropriate in the
public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act and
that, therefore, the Commission should grant the requested order.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-21140 Filed 9-1-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46996-46997]
[FR Doc No: 2015-19256]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4217-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2015-0002]

Kentucky; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4217-DR), dated May 1, 2015, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective date: July 21, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the Commonwealth of Kentucky is hereby amended to include the
following area among those areas determined to have been adversely
affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his
declaration of May 1, 2015.

    Rowan County for Public Assistance (already designated for
Individual Assistance).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance

(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation
Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2015-19256 Filed 8-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


TABLE 2 ANNUAL BURDEN OF REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARD ( NSPS) SUBPART LL  METALLIC MINERAL PROCESSING PLANTS REPORTING/ RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT Hours/ Occurence ( A) Occurences/

Year ( B) Hours/ Year ( C= A* B)

( C) Respondents/

Year ( D) Hours/ Year ( E= C* D)

( E) Costs/ Year ( F)

1. APPLICATIONS N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 2. SURVEY AND STUDIES N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 3. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS a. Read Instructions 1 1 1 0 0 $ 0.00 b. Required Activities Initial Performance Tests 330 1 330 0 0 $ 0.00 Repeat of Performance Tests 330 0.2 66 0 0 $ 0.00 c. Create Information  Included in 3b

d. Gather Existing Information  Included in 3b

e. Write Report Notification of Construction/ Reconstruction 2 1 2 0 0 $ 0.00 Notification of Actual Startup 2 1 2 0 0 $ 0.00 Notification of Initial Performance Test 2 1 2 0 0 $ 0.00 Report of Performance Test  Included in 3b

Notif. of Physical or Operational Change 2 1 2 0 0 $ 0.00 Notification of Demonstration of CMS 2 1 2 0 0 $ 0.00 Semi Annual Scrubber Malfunction Report 8 2 16 22 352 $ 19,479.68 Report of CMS Demonstration  Included in 3b

4. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS a. Read Instructions  Included in 3a

b. Plan Activities  Included in 3b

c. Implement Activities  Included in 3b

d. Develop Record System N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A e. Time to Enter Information*

Records of Operating Parameters 0.25 250 62.5 22 1375 $ 76,092.50 Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction 1.5 1 1.5 22 33 $ 1,826.22 f. Train Personnel N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A g. Audits N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN 1760 $ 97,398.40 Assumptions Number of affected facilities 22 Time required to read instructions ( hours) 1 Time required to complete performance test ( hours)** 330 Rate of failed performance tests 20%

Time required to complete Method 9 ( hours) 4 Time required to record operating parameters ( hours) 0.25 Number of days operating per year 250 Number of new facilities ( per year) 0 Time required to record startups, shutdowns,

malfunctions etc. ( hours) 1.5 Number of startups, shutdowns, malfuctions,

etc. ( per year) 1 Time Required for notification preparation ( hours) 2 Technicial labor rate $ 55.34


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 25, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 34404]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15586]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2017-0686]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Sacramento River, Sacramento, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of deviation from drawbridge regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a temporary deviation from the
operating schedule that governs the Tower Drawbridge across the
Sacramento River, mile 59.0 at Sacramento, CA. The deviation is
necessary to allow the community to participate in the Color Run. This
deviation allows the bridge to remain in the closed-to-navigation
position during the deviation period.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. on
August 5, 2017.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this deviation, [USCG-2017-0686], is
available at http://www.regulations.gov. Type the docket number in the
``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the
line associated with this deviation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary deviation, call or email Carl T. Hausner, Chief, Bridge
Section, Eleventh Coast Guard District; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The California Department of Transportation
has requested a temporary change to the operation of the Tower
Drawbridge, mile 59.0, over the Sacramento River, at Sacramento, CA.
The drawbridge navigation span provides a vertical clearance of 30 feet
above Mean High Water in the closed-to-navigation position. The draw
operates as required by 33 CFR 117.189(a). Navigation on the waterway
is commercial and recreational.
    The drawspan will be secured in the closed-to-navigation position
from 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. on August 5, 2017, to allow the community
to participate in the Color Run. This temporary deviation has been
coordinated with the waterway users. No objections to the proposed
temporary deviation were raised.
    Vessels able to pass through the bridge in the closed position may
do so at anytime. The bridge will be able to open for emergencies and
there is no immediate alternate route for vessels to pass. The Coast
Guard will also inform the users of the waterway, through our Local and
Broadcast Notices to Mariners, of the change in operating schedule for
the bridge so that vessel operators can arrange their transits to
minimize any impact caused by the temporary deviation.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the effective
period of this temporary deviation. This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: July 20, 2017.
Carl T. Hausner,
District Bridge Chief, Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2017-15586 Filed 7-24-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 112 (Friday, June 10, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37496-37499]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13542]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-4878; Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-001-AD;
Amendment 39-18551; AD 2016-12-02]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Various Aircraft Equipped With BRP-
Powertrain GmbH & Co KG 912 A Series Engine

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for various
aircraft equipped with a BRP-Powertrain GmbH & Co KG (formerly Rotax
Aircraft Engines) 912 A series engine. This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as a design change of the engine cylinder head temperature
sensor without a concurrent revision of the engine model designation,
the engine part number, or the cockpit indication to the pilot. We are
issuing this AD to require actions to address the unsafe condition on
these products.

DATES: This AD is effective July 15, 2016.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of July 15,
2016.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
4878; or in person at Document Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,

Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact BRP-
Powertrain GmbH & Co. KG, Welser Strasse 32, A-4623 Gunskirchen,
Austria; phone: +43 7246 601 0; fax: +43 7246 601 9130; Internet:
www.rotax-aircraft-engines.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for Docket No. FAA-
2016-4878.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to various aircraft equipped
with a BRP-Powertrain GmbH & Co KG (formerly Rotax Aircraft Engines)
912 A series engine. The NPRM was published in the Federal Register on
March 28, 2016 (81 FR 17109). The NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products and was based on mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country. The MCAI states:

    A design change of the engine cylinder heads was introduced by
BRP-Powertrain in March 2013 which modifies the engine/aircraft
interfaces by substituting the previous cylinder head temperature
(CHT) measurement (limit temperature 135 [deg]C/150 [deg]C) with a
coolant temperature (CT) measurement (limit temperature 120 [deg]C).
The design change was communicated on 15 May 2013 by BRP-Powertrain
Service Instruction (SI) 912-020R7/914-022R7 (single document) but
was not identified by a change of the engine model designation or of
the engine P/N, but only through the cylinder head P/N and the
position of the temperature sensor.
    Consequently, engines with the new cylinder heads (installed
during production or replaced in-service during maintenance) may be
installed on an aircraft without concurrent modification of that
aircraft, instructions for which should be provided by the Type
Certificate (TC) holder or Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
holder, as applicable. In this case, the coolant temperature with a
maximum engine operating limit of 120 [deg]C (valid for engines
operated with water diluted glycol coolant) is displayed on a CHT
indicator with a typical limit marking (red radial/range) of more
than 120 [deg]C.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, will prevent the
pilot to identify coolant limit exceedances, with subsequent loss of
coolant (120 [deg]C is the boiling temperature of the coolant),
which could lead to engine in-flight shut-down, possibly resulting
in a forced landing, with consequent damage to the aircraft and
injury to occupants.
    BRP-Powertrain published revised SI-912-020R8/914-022R8 to
clarify that, on the new cylinder heads, the coolant temperature,
instead of the cylinder head temperature in the aluminum, is
measured. EASA issued SIB 2014-34 to raise awareness that
installation of affected engines and spare parts, without concurrent
incorporation of aircraft TC/STC holder approved modifications, and
even if unintended and unnoticed by production or maintenance,
constitutes an unapproved aircraft modification.
    Since EASA published the SIB, further investigation has finally
determined that sufficient reason exists to warrant AD action.
    For the reason stated above, this AD requires a one-time
inspection to determine the actual engine configuration and,
depending on findings, engine reidentification and (depending on TC
or STC holder installation) modification of the affected aircraft.
This also affects engines that are operated with waterless coolant.

The MCAI can be found in the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2016-4878-0002.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (81 FR 17109, March 28,
2016) or on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (81 FR 17109, March 28, 2016) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (81 FR 17109, March 28, 2016).

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed BRP-Powertrain GmbH & CO KG issued Rotax Aircraft
Engines BRP Service Bulletin SB-912-068 and SB-914-049 (co-published as
one document), dated April 16, 2015. The service information describes
procedures for re-identifying the engine that has new cylinder heads,
part numbers 413235 and 413236 installed. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 65 products of U.S. registry.
    We also estimate that it will take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the engine re-identification requirement of this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this portion of
this AD on U.S. operators to be $5,525, or $85 per product.
    We also estimate that it will take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the engine installation modification to indicate a Maximum
Coolant Temperature requirement of this AD. The average labor rate is
$85 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this portion of
this AD on U.S. operators to be $5,525, or $85 per product.
    We also estimate that it will take about 1.5 work-hours per product
to comply with the cylinder head replacement option of this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about
$2,500 to replace a single engine cylinder head.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this portion of
this AD on U.S. operators to be $2,627.50 per engine cylinder head.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2016-12-02 Various Aircraft: Amendment 39-18551; Docket No. FAA-
2016-4878; Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-001-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective July 15,
2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all serial numbers of the airplanes listed in
table 1 of paragraph (c) of this AD, that are:
    (1) equipped with a BRP-Powertrain GmbH & Co KG (formerly Rotax
Aircraft Engines) 912 A series engine with a part number (P/N)
413235 or 413236 cylinder head installed in position 2 or 3; and
    (2) certificated in any category.

              Table 1 of Paragraph (c)--Affected Airplanes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Type certificate holder         Aircraft model        Engine model
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aeromot-Ind[uacute]stria       AMT-200..............  912 A2
 Mec[acirc]nico-
 Metal[uacute]rgica Ltda.
Diamond Aircraft Industries..  HK 36 R ``SUPER        912 A
                                DIMONA''.
DIAMOND AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES    HK 36 TS and HK 36 TC  912 A3
 GmbH.
Diamond Aircraft Industries    DA20-A1..............  912 A3
 Inc..
HOAC-Austria.................  DV 20 KATANA.........  912 A3
Iniziative Industriali         Sky Arrow 650 TC.....  912 A2
 Italiane S.p.A..
SCHEIBE-Flugzeugbau GmbH.....  SF 25C...............  912 A2, 912 A3
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 72: Engine--
Reciprocating.

(e) Reason

    This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. This AD was prompted by design change of the engine
cylinder head temperature sensor without a concurrent revision of
the engine model designation, the engine part number, or the cockpit
indication to the pilot. The sensor now measures the coolant
temperature rather than the cylinder head temperature. If the engine
coolant temperature with a maximum engine operating limit of 120
[deg]C is displayed on a Cylinder Head Temperature indicator with a
typical limit marking greater than 120 [deg]C, the pilot will be
unable to identify coolant temperature limit exceedances. This could
result in loss of coolant, which could cause an inflight engine
shutdown and forced landing.

(f) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following actions:
    (1) Within 6 months after July 15, 2016 (the effective date of
this AD), for engines with cylinder heads listed in paragraph (c)(1)
of this AD installed on both position 2 and position 3, change the
engine model designation on the engine type data plate to include a
``-01'' suffix following paragraph 3.1.1) of the Accomplishment/
Instructions in Rotax Aircraft Engines BRP Service Bulletin SB-912-
068 and SB-914-049 (co-published as one document), dated April 16,
2015.
    (2) Within 6 months after July 15, 2016 (the effective date of
this AD), for engines with only one cylinder head listed paragraph
(c)(1) of this AD installed in a position 2 or 3, in order to keep
such cylinder installed, you must replace the cylinder head
installed on the unchanged position (2 or 3, as applicable) with a
cylinder head having a P/N listed in paragraph (c)(1) of this AD,
and change the engine model designation on the engine type data
plate to include a ``-01'' suffix following paragraph 3.1.1) of the
Accomplishment/Instructions in Rotax Aircraft Engines BRP Service
Bulletin SB-912-068 and SB-914-049 (co-published as one document),
dated April 16, 2015.
    (3) Before further flight after doing the required actions in
paragraphs (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD as applicable, modify the
aircraft and related documentation to indicate a Maximum Coolant
Temperature limit of 120 [deg]C using FAA-approved procedures.
    (i) Such procedures can be found by contacting your aircraft
type certificate holder or the FAA contact specified in paragraph
(g)(1) of this AD. The service documents referenced in paragraph (h)
of this AD are examples of FAA-approved procedures for the
applicable aircraft.
    (ii) These re-identified engines remain eligible for
installation on approved aircraft-engine combinations.
    (4) As of July 15, 2016 (the effective date of this AD), do not
install any other P/N cylinder head unless that installation is done
following approved instructions provided by BRP-Powertrain at the
address provided in paragraph (i)(3) of this AD.

(g) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Jim Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(h) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.:
2015-0240, dated December 18, 2015; Rotax Aircraft Engines BRP
Service Bulletin SB-912-066 R1/SB-914-047 R1 (published as one
document), Revision 1, dated April 23, 2015; Diamond Aircraft
Industries GmbH Optional Service Bulletin OSB 36-111, dated
September 17, 2015; Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Work
Instruction WI-OSB 36-111, dated September 17, 2015; Diamond
Aircraft Service Bulletin No.: DA20-72-04, dated January 22, 2015;
Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Optional Service Bulletin OSB 20-
066, dated September 17, 2015; Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Work
Instruction WI-OSB 20-066, dated September 17, 2015; and Scheibe
Aircraft GmbH Service Information 02/14-1, dated December 15, 2014,
for related information. You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2016-4878-0002.
For information on the availability of the service documents above,
contact the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

(i) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Rotax Aircraft Engines BRP Service Bulletin SB-912-068 and
SB-914-049 (co-published as one document), dated April 16, 2015.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For BRP-Powertrain GmbH & CO KG service information
identified in this AD, contact BRP-Powertrain GmbH & Co. KG, Welser
Strasse 32, A-4623 Gunskirchen, Austria; phone: +43 7246 601 0; fax:
+43 7246 601 9130; Internet: www.rotax-aircraft-engines.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329-4148. In addition, you can access this service information
on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2016-4878.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 1, 2016.
Pat Mullen,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-13542 Filed 6-9-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 207 (Monday, October 26, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67648-67649]
[FR Doc No: 2020-23375]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0505; Airspace Docket No. 20-ASW-1]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of V-63 in the Vicinity of Texoma, OK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends VHF Omnidirectional Range (VOR) Federal
airway V-63 due to the planned decommissioning of the VOR portion of
the Texoma, OK, VOR/Distance Measuring Equipment (VOR/DME) navigation
aid (NAVAID). The Texoma VOR provides navigation guidance for a portion
of V-63 and is being decommissioned as part of the FAA's VOR Minimum
Operational Network (MON) program.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, December 31, 2020. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
Title 1 Code of Federal Regulations part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Rules and Regulations Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. The Order is also available for inspection
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of FAA Order 7400.11E at NARA, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it modifies the route structure as necessary to preserve
the safe and efficient flow of air traffic within the National Airspace
System.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking for Docket No.
FAA-2020-0505 in the Federal Register (85 FR 38340; June 26, 2020),
amending VOR Federal airway V-63 in the vicinity of Texoma, OK. The
proposed action was due to the planned decommissioning of the VOR
portion of the Texoma, OK, VOR/DME. Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on
the proposal. No comments were received.
    VOR Federal airways are published in paragraph 6010(a) of FAA Order
7400.11E dated July 21, 2020, and effective September 15, 2020, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The VOR Federal airways
listed in this document will be subsequently published in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020, and effective September 15,
2020. FAA Order 7400.11E is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11E lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    The FAA is amending Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 to modify VOR Federal airway V-63 due to the planned
decommissioning of the VOR portion of the Texoma, OK, VOR/DME. The VOR
Federal airway action is described below.
    V-63: V-63 extends between the Bowie, TX, VORTAC and the Texoma,
OK, VOR/DME; between the Razorback, AR, VORTAC and the Oshkosh, WI,
VORTAC; and between the Wausau, WI, VORTAC and the Houghton, MI, VOR/
DME. The airway segment between the Bowie, TX, VORTAC and the Texoma,

OK, VOR/DME is removed. The unaffected portions of the existing airway
remain as charted.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action of modifying VOR Federal
airway V-63 due to the planned decommissioning of the VOR portion of
the Texoma, OK, VOR/DME NAVAID qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental Policy Act and its implementing
regulations at 40 CFR part 1500, and in accordance with FAA Order
1050.1F, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, paragraph 5-
6.5a, which categorically excludes from further environmental impact
review rulemaking actions that designate or modify classes of airspace
areas, airways, routes, and reporting points (see 14 CFR part 71,
Designation of Class A, B, C, D, and E Airspace Areas; Air Traffic
Service Routes; and Reporting Points). As such, this action is not
expected to result in any potentially significant environmental
impacts. In accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, paragraph 5-2 regarding
Extraordinary Circumstances, the FAA has reviewed this action for
factors and circumstances in which a normally categorically excluded
action may have a significant environmental impact requiring further
analysis. The FAA has determined that no extraordinary circumstances
exist that warrant preparation of an environmental assessment or
environmental impact study.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11D,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and
effective September 15, 2019, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6010(a) Domestic VOR Federal Airways.

* * * * *

V-63 [Amended]

    From Razorback, AR; Springfield, MO; Hallsville, MO; Quincy, IL;
Burlington, IA; Moline, IL; Davenport, IA; Rockford, IL; Janesville,
WI; Badger, WI; to Oshkosh, WI. From Wausau, WI; Rhinelander, WI; to
Houghton, MI. Excluding that airspace at and above 10,000 feet MSL
from 5 NM north to 46 NM north of Quincy, IL, when the Howard West
MOA is active.
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 17, 2020.
Scott M. Rosenbloom,
Acting Manager, Rules and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2020-23375 Filed 10-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P