[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78071-78073]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25009]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-98874; File No. SR-NYSE-2023-39]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Rules 9521 and 9522 To Correct Obsolete References to a FINRA
Department

November 7, 2023.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on October 26, 2023, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rules 9521 (Purposes and
Definitions) and 9522 (Initiation of Eligibility Proceeding; Member
Regulation Consideration) to correct an obsolete reference to a
department of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA''). The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to proposes to amend Rules 9521 (Purposes and
Definitions) and 9522 (Initiation of Eligibility Proceeding; Member
Regulation Consideration) to correct an obsolete reference to a FINRA
department.
Background and Proposed Rule Change
    In 2013, the NYSE adopted disciplinary rules that are, with certain
exceptions, substantially the same as the FINRA Rule 8000 Series and
Rule 9000 Series, and which set forth rules for conducting
investigations and enforcement actions.\3\ The NYSE disciplinary rules
were implemented on July 1, 2013.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68678 (January 16,
2013), 78 FR 5213 (January 24, 2013) (SR-NYSE-2013-02) (``2013
Notice''); Release No. 69045 (March 5, 2013), 78 FR 15394 (March 11,
2013) (SR-NYSE-2013-02) (``2013 Approval Order'').
    \4\ See NYSE Information Memorandum 13-8 (May 24, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In adopting disciplinary rules modeled on FINRA's rules, the NYSE
adopted the procedures set forth in the Rule 9520 Series for a covered
person to become or remain associated with a member organization
notwithstanding the existence of a statutory disqualification as
defined in Section 3(a)(39) of the Act, and for a current member
organization or covered person to obtain relief from the eligibility or
qualification requirements of the Exchange's Rules, which the rule
refers to as ``eligibility proceedings.'' Rule 9521 sets forth certain
definitions relating to eligibility proceedings. Rule 9521(b)(1)
defines the term ``Application'' to mean FINRA's Form MC-400 for
covered persons or Form MC-400A for member organizations filed with
FINRA's Department of Registration and Disclosure (abbreviated as
``RAD'' in the Exchange's rules). Rule 9522, which governs initiation
of an eligibility proceeding by the Exchange, contains references to
RAD in subdivisions (b)(1), (c) and (e)(3)(A).
    In 2020, FINRA changed RAD's name to ``Credentialing, Registration,
Education and Disclosure'' (abbreviated as ``CRED'' in FINRA's rules)
and amended, among others, FINRA Rules 9521 and 9522 to reflect the
name change.\5\ The Exchange proposes to conform the references in the
Exchange's rules. To effectuate this change, the Exchange would retain
the reference to ``FINRA's Department'' in Rule 9521(b)(1) and change
the capital ``D'' in department to lowercase. The Exchange would
replace ``Registration and Disclosure (`RAD')'' in Rule 9521(b)(1) with
``Credentialing, Registration, Education and Disclosure (`CRED')''. The
Exchange would also replace ``RAD'' with ``CRED'' in Rules 9522(b)(1)
(one reference), (c) (two references) and (e)(3)(A) (one reference).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90344 (November 4,
2020), 85 FR 71695 (November 10, 2020) (SR-FINRA-2020-039) (Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend FINRA Rules To Reflect Name Changes to Two FINRA Departments:
The Office of Dispute Resolution and the Department of Registration
and Disclosure).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act,\6\ in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed change to Rules 9521 and
9522 to update and replace obsolete references to a FINRA department
would increase the clarity and transparency of the Exchange's rules and
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market by ensuring that persons subject to the Exchange's jurisdiction,
regulators, and the investing public could more easily navigate and
understand the Exchange rules. The Exchange further believes that the
proposed change would not be inconsistent with the public interest and
the protection of investors because investors will not be harmed and in
fact would benefit from increased clarity, thereby reducing potential
confusion.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\7\ the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is not intended to
address competitive issues but is rather concerned with deleting and
replacing obsolete references in its rules. Since the proposal does not
substantively modify system functionality or processes on the Exchange,
the proposed changes will not impose any burden on competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \9\ thereunder. Because
the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \11\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78(b)(3)(A).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \12\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\13\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed
rule change may become operative immediately upon filing. The
Commission believes that waving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest,
because it will allow the Exchange to correct obsolete references to a
FINRA department in its rule text. Accordingly, the Commission
designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon filing.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \14\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission also has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-NYSE-2023-39 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSE-2023-39. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSE-2023-39 and should be
submitted on or before December 5, 2023.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12), (59).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-25009 Filed 11-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 26 (Thursday, February 9, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9999-10000]
[FR Doc No: 2017-02654]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP17-39-000]

Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC; Notice of Request
Under Blanket Authorization

    Take notice that on January 23, 2017, Natural Gas Pipeline Company
of America LLC (Natural), located at 3250 Lacey Road, Suite 700,
Downers Grove, Illinois 60515, filed in Docket No. CP17-39-000, a prior
notice request pursuant to sections 157.205, 157.208 and 157.216 of the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations under the Natural
Gas Act (NGA), seeking authorization to abandon an injection and
withdrawal well, the related pipeline lateral, and the related meter,
tap and auxiliary facilities at Natural's North Lansing Storage Field
located in Harrison County, Texas, all as more fully set forth in the
application, which is on file with the Commission and open to public
inspection. The filing may also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number
excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY,
(202) 502-8659.
    Any questions regarding the Request should be directed to Bruce H.
Newsome, Vice President, Regulatory Products and Services, Natural Gas
Pipeline Company of America LLC, 3250 Lacey Road, Suite 700, Downers
Grove, Illinois 60515-7918, by telephone at:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email
at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Any person may, within 60 days after the issuance of the instant
notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's
Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or notice of
intervention. Any person filing to intervene or the Commission's staff
may, pursuant to section 157.205 of the Commission's Regulations under
the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) file a protest to the request. If no protest
is filed within the time allowed therefore, the proposed activity shall
be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time allowed for
protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after
the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be
treated as an application for authorization pursuant to section 7 of
the NGA.
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenter's will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenter's will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentary, will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.

    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests, and interventions via the Internet in lieu of paper. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site (www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link. Persons unable to file
electronically should submit an original and 5 copies of the protest or
intervention to the Federal Energy regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.

    Dated: February 2, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-02654 Filed 2-8-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: February 22, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 36)]
[Notices]
[Page 9796-9797]
[DOCID:fr22fe08-60]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0378; FRL-8532-2]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; TSCA Sections 402 and Section 404
Training, Certification, Accreditation and Standards for Lead-Based
Paint Activities (Renewal); EPA ICR No. 1715.09, OMB No. 2070-0155

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501, et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below, describes the
nature of the information collection activity and its expected burden
and costs.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before March 24,
2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OPPT-2007-0378 to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
Document Control Office (DCO), Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code: 7407T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB at: Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Cunningham, Director,
Environmental Assistance Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 7408-M, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 202-
554-1404; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On July 11, 2007 (72 FR 37766), EPA sought comments on this
renewal ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments
during the comment period. Any comments related to this ICR should be
submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0378, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person inspection at the OPPT Docket
in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public
Reading Room is open from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is
202-566-1744, and the telephone number for the Pollution Prevention and
Toxics Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at
www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing in www.regulations.gov as EPA receives
them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted
material, Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other information
whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For further
information about the electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov.
    Title: TSCA Sections 402 and Section 404 Training, Certification,
Accreditation and Standards for Lead-Based Paint Activities (Renewal).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR No. 1715.09, OMB No. 2070-0155.
    ICR Status: This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on February
29, 2008. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal
Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed
either by publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate
means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if
applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA
regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: This information collection applies to reporting and
recordkeeping requirements found in sections 402 and 404 of the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) and applicable regulations at 40 CFR part
745, subparts L and Q. The purposes of the requirements under TSCA
section 402 are to ensure that individuals conducting activities that
prevent, detect and eliminate hazards associated with lead-based paint
in residential facilities, particularly those occupied or used by
children, are properly trained and certified, that training programs
providing instruction in such activities are accredited, and that these
activities are conducted according to reliable, effective and safe work
practice standards. The TSCA section 404 regulations include reporting
and recordkeeping requirements that apply to states and Indian Tribes
that seek Federal authorization to administer and enforce state and
tribal programs that regulate lead-based paint activities based on the
section 402 regulations. The overall goals of the section 402 and
section 404 regulations and the reporting and recordkeeping
requirements found therein are to ensure the availability of a trained
and qualified workforce to identify and address lead-based paint
hazards in residences, and to protect the general public from exposure
to lead hazards.
    Responses to the collection of information are mandatory (see 40
CFR part 745, subparts L and Q). Respondents may claim all or part of a
notice as CBI. EPA will disclose information that is covered by a CBI
claim only to the extent permitted by, and in accordance with, the
procedures in 40 CFR part 2.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to range between
0.28 hours and 80 hours per respondent, depending on the type of
respondent. Burden means the total time, effort or financial resources
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating and
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements;
train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by
this

action are persons who provide training in lead-based paint activities,
persons who are engaged in lead-based paint activities, and state
agencies that administer lead-based paint activities.
    Frequency of Collection: On Occasion.
    Estimated No. of Respondents: 43,082.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 774,740 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Labor Costs: $28,792,102.
    Changes in Burden Estimates: There is a net increase of 333,927
hours (from 440,813 hours to 774,740 hours) in the total estimated
respondent burden compared with that currently in the OMB inventory.
This increase represents an adjustment in the estimated number of
respondents and/or the number of activities or events for which
respondents must provide information, based on EPA's experience since
the approval of the most recent ICR. A detailed explanation of the
change in burden appears in the Supporting Statement. The increase is
an adjustment.

    Dated: February 14, 2008.
Joseph A. Sierra,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
 [FR Doc. E8-3378 Filed 2-21-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 82 (Monday, May 1, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20260-20262]
[FR Doc No: 2017-08646]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2016-0615; FRL-9961-48-Region 4]

Air Plan Approval; TN: Non-Interference Demonstration for Federal
Low-Reid Vapor Pressure Requirement in Middle Tennessee

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving the
State of Tennessee's November 21, 2016, revision to its State
Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted through the Tennessee Department
of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), in support of the State's
request that EPA change the federal Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP)
requirements for Davidson, Rutherford, Sumner, Williamson, and Wilson
Counties (hereinafter referred to as the ``Middle Tennessee Area'' or
``Area''). Tennessee's November 21, 2016, SIP submittal revises its
maintenance plan for the Middle Tennessee Area for the 1997 8-hour
ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) and demonstrates
that relaxing the federal RVP requirements in this Area would not
interfere with the Area's ability to meet the requirements of the Clean
Air Act (CAA or Act). Specifically, Tennessee's SIP revision concludes
that relaxing the federal RVP requirement from 7.8 pounds per square
inch (psi) to 9.0 psi for gasoline sold between June 1 and September 15
of each year in the Area would not interfere with attainment or
maintenance of the NAAQS or with any other CAA requirement. EPA has
determined that Tennessee's November 21, 2016, SIP revision is
consistent with the applicable provisions of the CAA.

DATES: This rule is effective May 1, 2017.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2016-0615. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the
index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. Brad Akers, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. Mr. Akers can be reached via telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
via electronic mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. What is the background for this final action?

    On November 21, 2016, Tennessee submitted a SIP revision consisting
of a revision to its 110(a)(1) maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS for the Middle Tennessee Area and the technical
noninterference demonstration supporting the State's request to change
the federal RVP requirements from 7.8 psi to 9.0 psi in the Area. In a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) published on February 24, 2017 (82
FR 11517), EPA proposed to approve the State's noninterference
demonstration and the updates to updated emissions inventory and
projections associated with the mobile source modeling used in the
State's noninterference demonstration related to RVP. The details of
Tennessee's submittal and the rationale for EPA's actions are explained
in the NPR. EPA did not receive any adverse comments on the proposed
action.

II. Final Action

    EPA is approving Tennessee's November 21, 2016, SIP revision
consisting of a revision to its 110(a)(1) maintenance plan for the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Middle Tennessee Area and the technical
noninterference demonstration supporting the State's request to change
the federal RVP requirements from 7.8 psi to 9.0 psi in the Area.
Specifically, EPA is finalizing updated emissions inventory and
projections associated with the mobile source modeling used in the
State's noninterference demonstration related to RVP. EPA has
determined that the change in the RVP requirements for Davidson,
Rutherford, Sumner, Williamson, and Wilson Counties will

not interfere with attainment or maintenance of any NAAQS or with any
other applicable requirement of the CAA.
    EPA has determined that Tennessee's November 21, 2016, RVP-related
SIP revision is consistent with the applicable provisions of the CAA
for the reasons provided in the NPR. Through this action, EPA is not
removing the federal 7.8 psi RVP requirement for Davidson, Rutherford,
Sumner, Williamson, and Wilson Counties. Any such action would occur in
a separate rulemaking.
    In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d), EPA finds that there is good
cause for this action to become effective immediately upon publication.
This is because a delayed effective date is unnecessary because today's
action approves a noninterference demonstration that will serve as the
basis of a subsequent action to relieve the Area from certain CAA
requirements that would otherwise apply to it. The immediate effective
date for this action is authorized under both 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), which
provides that rulemaking actions may become effective less than 30 days
after publication if the rule grants or recognizes an exemption or
relieves a restriction, and section 553(d)(3), which allows an
effective date less than 30 days after publication as otherwise
provided by the agency for good cause found and published with the
rule. The purpose of the 30-day waiting period prescribed in section
553(d) is to give affected parties a reasonable time to adjust their
behavior and prepare before the final rule takes effect. This rule,
however, does not create any new regulatory requirements such that
affected parties would need time to prepare before the rule takes
effect. Rather, this rule will serve as a basis for a subsequent action
to relieve the Area from certain CAA requirements. For these reasons,
EPA finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) for this action to become
effective on the date of publication of this action.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submittal that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, October 7, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) nor will it
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 30, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements and
Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: March 31, 2017.
V. Anne Heard,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart RR--Tennessee

0
2. Section 52.2220(e) is amended by adding a new entry for ``1997 8-
hour ozone maintenance plan update for the Middle Tennessee Area and
RVP standard'' at the end of the table to read as follows:

Sec.  52.2220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

                                EPA-Approved Tennessee Non-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Applicable
  Name of non-regulatory  SIP     geographic  or        State        EPA approval
           provision              nonattainment    effective date        date                Explanation
                                       area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
1997 8-hour ozone maintenance   Davidson,              11/21/2016  5/1/2017,         ...........................
 plan update for the Middle      Rutherford,                        [Insert Federal
 Tennessee Area and RVP          Sumner,                            Register
 standard.                       Williamson, and                    citation].
                                 Wilson Counties.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2017-08646 Filed 4-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 56797]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22582]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC14-145-000.
    Applicants: American Transmission Company LLC.
    Description: Application of American Transmission Company LLC for
Authority to Acquire Transmission Facilities Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act.
    Filed Date: 9/16/14.
    Accession Number: 20140916-5131.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/14.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG14-105-000.
    Applicants: Indeck Wharton LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification as Exempt Wholesale Generator of
Indeck Wharton LLC.
    Filed Date: 9/16/14.
    Accession Number: 20140916-5203.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/14.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER12-303-000.
    Applicants: Virginia Electric and Power Company, Dominion Marketing
Affiliates.
    Description: Change in Status Nuclear Waiver of Dominion Resources
Services, Inc.
    Filed Date: 9/16/14.
    Accession Number: 20140916-5130.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1386-003; ER14-2484-001; ER14-2834-001.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corporation
Motion to Modify Effective Date of Tariff Revisions, Request for
Shortened Response Time, and Request for Limited Waiver.
    Filed Date: 9/16/14.
    Accession Number: 20140916-5140.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2518-001.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment per 35.17(b): NYISO filing: change
outage states effective date from 11/1/14 to 2/1/15 to be effective 2/
1/2015.
    Filed Date: 9/16/14.
    Accession Number: 20140916-5144.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2597-001.
    Applicants: Town of Hanover.
    Description: Tariff Amendment per 35.17(b): Amended MBR Tariff
Application to be effective 10/15/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/16/14.
    Accession Number: 20140916-5132.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2888-000.
    Applicants: Mississippi Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): PBOP
2014 Filing to be effective 1/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/16/14.
    Accession Number: 20140916-5162.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2889-000.
    Applicants: Georgia Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 2014
PBOP Filing to be effective 1/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/16/14.
    Accession Number: 20140916-5163.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2890-000.
    Applicants: Southern Electric Generating Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): SEGCO
2014 PBOP Filing to be effective 1/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/16/14.
    Accession Number: 20140916-5164.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2891-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 1606R1
American Electric Power NITSA and NOA to be effective 6/20/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/16/14.
    Accession Number: 20140916-5197.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/14.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 16, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-22582 Filed 9-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 204)]
[Notices]
[Page 65365-65366]
[DOCID:fr22oc10-96]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2010-0062]

Disaster Temporary Housing Operational Guide

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is accepting
comments on the Disaster Temporary Housing Operational Guide.

DATES: Comments must be received by November 22, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Comments must be identified by docket ID FEMA-2010-0062 and
may be submitted by one of the following methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. Please note that this proposed
operational guide is not a rulemaking and the Federal Rulemaking Portal
is being utilized only as a mechanism for receiving comments.
    Mail: Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Room 840, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472-3100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Miller, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, 202-212-
1000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Public Participation

    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket ID. Regardless of the method used for submitting comments or
material, all submissions will be posted, without change, to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov, and will
include any personal information you provide. Therefore, submitting
this information makes it public. You may wish to read the Privacy Act
notice, which can be viewed by clicking on the ``Privacy Notice'' link
in the footer of http://www.regulations.gov.
    You may submit your comments and material by the methods specified
in the ADDRESSES section. Please submit your comments and any
supporting material by only one means to avoid the receipt and review
of duplicate submissions.
    Docket: The proposed operational guide is available in docket ID
FEMA-2010-0062. For access to the docket to read background documents
or comments received, go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://
www.regulations.gov and search for the docket ID. Submitted comments
may also be inspected at FEMA, Office of Chief Counsel, Room 840, 500 C
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

II. Background

    The proposed Disaster Temporary Housing Operational Guide builds on
previous annual Disaster Housing Plans to present a comprehensive
picture of FEMA housing assistance and housing support. The goal of
this document is to help FEMA's partners understand FEMA programs and
capabilities and to help establish stakeholder expectations.
    The proposed operational guide does not have the force or effect of
law.
    FEMA seeks comment on the proposed operational guide, which is
available online at http://www.regulations.gov in docket ID FEMA-2010-
0062. Based on the comments received, FEMA may make appropriate
revisions to the proposed operational guide. Although FEMA will
consider any comments received in the drafting of the final operational
guide, FEMA will not provide a response to comments document. When or
if FEMA issues a final operational guide, FEMA will publish a notice of
availability in the Federal Register and make the final operational
guide available at http://www.regulations.gov. The final operational
guide will not have the force or effect of law.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 5170b; 42 U.S.C. 5174; 44 CFR part 206.

Robert Farmer,
Deputy Director, Office of Policy and Program Analysis, Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-26705 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 44 (Friday, March 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12171-12172]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05073]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2015-0047; FRL-9922-69]

Implementation of a New Label for the Design for the Environment
(DfE) Safer Product Labeling Program and Supporting Modifications to
the DfE Standard for Safer Products; Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is making available a document that announces and
implements several important changes to EPA's Safer Product Labeling
Program (SPLP), as well as a number of conforming changes to the
program's Standard for Safer Products, including: New label designs and
a new name for the EPA SPLP; an associated fragrance-free label; and
related changes to the standard that qualifies products for the label.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 5, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2015-0047, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: Document Control Office (7407M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    For technical information contact: David DiFiore, Chemistry,
Economics and Sustainable Strategies Division, Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
202-564-8796; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be affected by this action if you participate in or
applying for certification under the DfE Safer Product Labeling Program
and use or hope to use the program's logo on your products. Also
potentially affected are consumers, institutional purchasers,
retailers, and distributors of DfE-labeled products who use the logo to
identify products that have met the Agency's safer-product criteria.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Manufacturing (NAICS codes 31-33).
     Construction (NAICS code 23).
     Wholesale trade (NAICS code 42).
     Retail trade (NAICS codes 44-45).
     Professional, scientific and technical services (NAICS
code 54).
     Accommodations and food Services (NAICS code 72).
     Other services, except public administration (NAICS code
81).
     Public administration (NAICS code 92).

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.

II. What action is the Agency taking?

    EPA is issuing a document, ``Changes to the Standard to Implement
the Safer Choice Label'' (https://wcms.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-02/documents/safer-choice-standard-changes.pdf), that implements a
new label and name for the DfE Safer Product Labeling Program, namely,
the EPA ``Safer Choice'' Program. The new label is available for
immediate use to program partners. The Agency is also making new-label-
related changes to the program's standard that qualifies products for
participation in the program. Finally, EPA is issuing a new, optional
fragrance-free certification. The program has redesigned its label for
several reasons: To better communicate the program's human health and
environmental protection goals, increase consumer and institutional/
industrial purchaser understanding and recognition of products bearing
the label, and encourage innovation and the development of safer
chemicals and chemical-based products. While effective immediately, the
Agency is requesting comment on the changes that are described in the
referenced document (EPA-HQ-OPPT-2015-0047), including the fragrance-
free certification, and may make further programmatic changes based on
the comments received. Please note that the Agency has received
extensive public input on the logo designs and is not requesting
further comment on them.

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.

    Dated: February 11, 2015.
Wendy C. Hamnett,
Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2015-05073 Filed 3-5-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5304-5307]
[FR Doc No: 2020-01636]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0525; Product Identifier 2019-NM-076-AD; Amendment
39-19824; AD 2020-01-18]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2006-11-
11, which applied to all The Boeing Company Model 757 airplanes. AD
2006-11-11 required incorporating a new revision to the Airworthiness
Limitations section of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to
mandate certain repetitive inspections for fatigue cracking of
principal structural elements (PSEs). This AD retains those actions and
requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate additional new or more restrictive
airworthiness limitations. This AD was prompted by a determination that
new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. The
FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: This AD is effective March 5, 2020.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of March 5,
2020.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain other publications listed in this AD as of June
30, 2006 (71 FR 30278, May 26, 2006).

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet: https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. It is also available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0525.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0525; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chandraduth Ramdoss, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 562-627-
5210; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to revise AD 2006-11-11, Amendment 39-14615 (71 FR 30278,
May 26, 2006) (``AD 2006-11-11''). AD 2006-11-11 applied to all The
Boeing Company Model 757 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on July 25, 2019 (84 FR 35840). The NPRM was prompted by a
determination that new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations
are necessary. The NPRM proposed to continue to require incorporating a
new revision to the Airworthiness Limitations section of the
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to mandate certain repetitive
inspections for fatigue cracking of PSEs. The NPRM also proposed to
require revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate new or more restrictive airworthiness
limitations. The FAA is issuing this AD to address fatigue cracking of
various PSEs; such fatigue cracking could adversely affect the
structural integrity of these airplanes.

Comments

    The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this AD. The following presents the comments received on the
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.

Support for the NPRM

    Boeing and United Airlines concurred with the NPRM. FedEx stated
that it has no issues with the proposed requirements of the NPRM.

Request To Clarify the Requirements of Paragraph (i) of the Proposed AD

    Delta Airlines (DAL) requested that the FAA clarify the
requirements of paragraph (i) of the proposed AD. DAL mentioned that it
had complied with the requirements of AD 2006-11-11 in the year 2006.
DAL then pointed out that it interprets the requirements of paragraph
(i) of the proposed AD to mean that once the NPRM is adopted as a final
rule, any alternative actions, intervals, or critical design
configuration control limitations (CDCCLs) will require approval of an
AMOC. DAL expressed concern that parties other than the FAA ACO branch
or the Boeing Company Organization Designation Authorization (ODA)
might not be aware that AD 2006-11-11 had been superseded.
Additionally, DAL mentioned that the period of time between adoption of
a new rule and the effective date of a new rule is typically used to
get all required documentation updated. DAL then pointed out that
operators attempt to incorporate newly adopted rules by the effective
date of the new rule and would not be able to have all of the related
documentation updated immediately upon adoption of the new rule. DAL
recommended that a ``grace period'' be included in paragraph (i) of the
proposed AD by revising to state that ``. . . no alternative actions
(e.g., inspections), intervals, or CDCCLs may be used after the
effective date of this AD unless. . . .''
    The FAA agrees to clarify. AMOCs provide an alternative method of
compliance to the methods required to be used in the associated AD. An
AMOC may only be approved after an AD has been published and only after
data are provided to show that the proposed solution is complete and
addresses the unsafe condition. Therefore, once this AD is published,
any person may request approval of an AMOC under the provisions of
paragraph (l) of this AD. The FAA understands the operator's choice to
comply with the AD requirements by the effective date, however, the
effective date is not a deadline. The compliance time of the required
actions is within 18 months after the effective date of this AD, which
means that the compliance time starts on the effective date. The
operator's choice to do the required actions early is commendable, but
does not necessitate a grace period. Additionally, paragraph (l)(4) of
this AD specifically authorizes the use of previously approved AMOCs
for AD 2006-11-11 for the corresponding provisions of this AD. The FAA
has not changed this AD in this regard.

Request To Clarify the Alternative Method of Compliance (AMOC)
Provisions

    American Airlines (AAL) requested that, due to differences in
verbiage between the requirements of paragraphs (i) and (j) of the
proposed AD, and paragraph (l) of the proposed AD, the FAA clarify
whether The Boeing Company ODA may approve alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections), intervals, or CDCCLs.
    The FAA agrees that clarification is necessary. The Boeing Company
ODA is able to approve AMOCs if they are within the authority delegated
to them by the FAA. It is likely that the FAA will delegate some AMOC
authority to the Boeing Company ODA for this AD. The FAA does not
delegate AMOC authority for CDCCLs. The FAA has not changed this AD in
this regard.

Request To Revise the Applicability for Supplemental Type Certificate
(STC) ST01518SE

    Aviation Partners Boeing (APB) requested that the FAA revise the
proposed applicability to specify that STC ST01518SE affects the
ability to accomplish the proposed actions. APB pointed out that STC
ST01518SE requires alternative actions or inspection intervals for some
of the new or updated tasks in Boeing 757 Maintenance Planning Data
(MPD) Document, Section 9, Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and
Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMRs), D622N001-9, Revision
October 2018. APB also stated that certain inspections and inspection
intervals for the structural significant items (SSIs) contained in APB
757-200 MPD Supplements AP57.2-0604.2 and AP57.2-0604.2-DTR, and for
the SSIs contained in APB 757-300 MPD Supplements AP57.3-0604.2 and
AP57.3-0604.2-DTR, are alternative to those contained in the Boeing 757
Maintenance Planning Data (MPD) Document, Section 9, Airworthiness
Limitations (AWLs) and Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMRs),
D622N001-9, Revision October 2018. APB mentioned that it will revise
the affected APB MPD supplements and apply for new AMOC(s) in
accordance with paragraph (l) of the proposed AD. APB also suggested
that paragraph (c) of the proposed AD be redesignated as paragraph
(c)(1) of this AD and add paragraph (c)(2) to this AD to state that
installation of STC ST01518SE affects the ability to accomplish the
actions required by this AD.

    The FAA concurs with the commenter. The FAA has redesignated
paragraph (c) of the proposed AD as paragraph (c)(1) of this AD and
added paragraph (c)(2) to this AD to state that installation of STC
ST01518SE affects the ability to accomplish the actions required by
this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST01518SE is installed,
a ``change in product'' AMOC approval request is necessary to comply
with the requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.
    The FAA has also redesignated paragraph (h) of the proposed AD as
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD and added paragraph (h)(2) of this AD to
require that, within 18 months after the effective date of this AD,
airplanes with STC ST01518SE installed, must revise the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate a
supplemental program to address the effect of STC ST01518SE, approved
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this
AD.
    Additionally, the FAA emphasizes that for any airplane that is
modified by an STC that affects any SSI inspections, an AMOC approval
request is necessary to comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments
received, and determined that air safety and the public interest
require adopting this AD with the changes described previously, and
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
    The FAA also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed Boeing 757 Maintenance Planning Data (MPD)
Document, Section 9, Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and Certification
Maintenance Requirements (CMRs), D622N001-9, Revision October 2018.
This service information describes procedures for airworthiness
limitations for structural inspections, fuel tank systems, safe life
limits, and certification maintenance requirements.
    This AD also requires the following service information, which the
Director of the Federal Register approved for incorporation by
reference as of June 30, 2006 (71 FR 30278, May 26, 2006).
     Boeing 757 Maintenance Planning Data (MPD) Document,
Section 9, ``Airworthiness Limitations and Certification Maintenance
Requirements,'' Subsection B. of Boeing Document D622N001-9, Revision
``May 2003.''
     Boeing 757 Maintenance Planning Data (MPD) Document,
Section 9, ``Airworthiness Limitations and Certification Maintenance
Requirements,'' Subsection B. of Boeing Document D622N001-9, Revision
``June 2005.''
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 561 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD.
    The retained and new actions specified in this AD have the same
cost for revising the existing maintenance or inspection program. The
FAA has determined that revising the existing maintenance or inspection
program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator, although the
agency recognizes that this number may vary from operator to operator.
In the past, the FAA has estimated that this action takes 1 work-hour
per airplane. Since operators incorporate maintenance or inspection
program changes for their affected fleet(s), the FAA has determined
that a per-operator estimate is more accurate than a per-airplane
estimate. Therefore, the FAA estimates the total cost per operator to
be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-hour).

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2006-11-11, Amendment 39-14615 (71 FR 30278, May 26, 2006), and adding
the following new AD:

2020-01-18 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-19824; Docket No. FAA-
2019-0525; Product Identifier 2019-NM-076-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective March 5, 2020.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2006-11-11, Amendment 39-14615 (71 FR 30278,
May 26, 2006) (``AD 2006-11-11'').

(c) Applicability

    (1) This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 757-200, -
200PF, -200CB, and -300 series airplanes, certificated in any
category.
    (2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST01518SE affects the ability to accomplish the actions required by
this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which

STC ST01518SE is installed, a ``change in product'' alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) approval request is necessary to comply
with the requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28, Fuel; 53,
Fuselage; 57, Wings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a determination that new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address fatigue cracking of various principal
structural elements (PSEs); such fatigue cracking could adversely
affect the structural integrity of these airplanes.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Revision to the Maintenance or Inspection Program, With No
Changes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2006-11-11, with no changes. Within 36 months after June 30, 2006
(the effective date of AD 2006-11-11), revise Section 9,
``Airworthiness Limitations and CMRs'' of the Boeing 757 Maintenance
Planning Data (MPD) Document to incorporate Subsection B. of Boeing
Document D622N001-9, Revision ``May 2003;'' or Revision ``June
2005;'' as applicable.

(h) New Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision

    (1) Except for airplanes identified in paragraph (h)(2) of this
AD: Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD, revise the
existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate the information specified in Boeing 757 Maintenance
Planning Data (MPD) Document, Section 9, Airworthiness Limitations
(AWLs) and Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMRs), D622N001-
9, Revision October 2018. The initial compliance time for doing the
new or updated tasks is at the time specified in Boeing 757
Maintenance Planning Data (MPD) Document, Section 9, Airworthiness
Limitations (AWLs) and Certification Maintenance Requirements
(CMRs), D622N001-9, Revision October 2018, or within 18 months after
the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later. The
compliance time for doing the unchanged tasks is at the time
specified in Boeing 757 Maintenance Planning Data (MPD) Document,
Section 9, Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and Certification
Maintenance Requirements (CMRs), D622N001-9, Revision October 2018.
    (2) For airplanes with STC ST01518SE installed: Within 18 months
after the effective date of this AD, revise the existing maintenance
or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate a supplemental
program to address the effect of STC ST01518SE, in accordance with
the procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this AD.

(i) No Alternative Actions, Intervals, or Critical Design Configuration
Control Limitations (CDCCLs) for Paragraph (g) of This AD

    Except as required by paragraph (h) of this AD: After the
existing maintenance or inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections), intervals, or CDCCLs may be used unless the actions,
intervals, and CDCCLs are approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (l) of this AD.

(j) No Alternative Actions, Intervals, or CDCCLs for Paragraph (h) of
This AD

    After the existing maintenance or inspection program has been
revised as required by paragraph (h) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, or CDCCLs may be used unless
the actions, intervals, and CDCCLs are approved as an AMOC in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this
AD.

(k) Terminating Action for the Requirements of Paragraph (g) of This AD

    Accomplishing the revision required by paragraph (h) of this AD
terminates the revision required by paragraph (g) of this AD.

(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (m) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Los
Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be approved, the
repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) AMOCs approved previously for AD 2001-20-12, Amendment 39-
12460 (66 FR 52492, October 16, 2001) and AD 2006-11-11 are approved
as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of this AD.

(m) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Chandraduth Ramdoss,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-
5239; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
March 5, 2020.
    (i) Boeing 757 Maintenance Planning Data (MPD) Document, Section
9, Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and Certification Maintenance
Requirements (CMRs), D622N001-9, Revision October 2018.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (4) The following service information was approved for IBR on
June 30, 2006 (71 FR 30278, May 26, 2006).
    (i) Boeing 757 Maintenance Planning Data Document, Section 9,
``Airworthiness Limitations and Certification Maintenance
Requirements,'' Subsection B. of Boeing Document D622N001-9,
Revision ``May 2003.''
    (ii) Boeing 757 Maintenance Planning Data Document, Section 9,
``Airworthiness Limitations and Certification Maintenance
Requirements,'' Subsection B. of Boeing Document D622N001-9,
Revision ``June 2005.''
    (5) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet: https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (6) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
    (7) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on January 21, 2020.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-01636 Filed 1-29-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 63 (Tuesday, April 4, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 16387]
[FR Doc No: 2017-06615]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR17-10-000]

GEL Texas Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Petition for Declaratory Order

    Take notice that on March 28, 2017, pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2) of
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207(a)(2) (2016), GEL Texas
Pipeline, LLC, a subsidiary of Genesis Energy, L.P. (Petitioner), filed
a petition for declaratory order (petition) seeking approval of the
overall rate structure and terms of service for 23-mile crude oil
pipeline consisting of a combination of new and existing facilities
that will connect origins in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico to markets in
Webster and Texas City, TX, as more fully explained in the petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on April 18, 2017.

    Dated: March 29, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-06615 Filed 4-3-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 103 (Tuesday, June 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29311-29312]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11598]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 3:15 p.m. on Thursday, June 3, 2021.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners,
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date,
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10),
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202)
551-5400.

    Dated: May 27, 2021.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-11598 Filed 5-27-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P