[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24696]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9956]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER12-1571-000]

 Verso Bucksport LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Verso Bucksport LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is May 9, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 19, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9956 Filed 4-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 20, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64534-64535]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22542]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 32262; 812-14549]

Global X Funds, et al.; Notice of Application

September 14, 2016.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').

ACTION: Notice of an application for an order under section 6(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') for an exemption from
sections 2(a)(32), 5(a)(1), 22(d), and 22(e) of the Act and rule 22c-1
under the Act, under sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act for an
exemption from sections 17(a)(1) and 17(a)(2) of the Act, and under
section 12(d)(1)(J) for an exemption from sections 12(d)(1)(A) and
12(d)(1)(B) of the Act. The requested order would permit (a) series of
certain open-end management investment companies that track the
performance of an index provided by an affiliated person to issue
shares (``Shares'') redeemable in large aggregations only (``Creation
Units''); (b) secondary market transactions in Shares to occur at
negotiated market prices rather than at net asset value (``NAV''); (c)
certain funds to pay redemption proceeds, under certain circumstances,
more than seven days after the tender of Shares for redemption; (d)
certain affiliated persons of a fund to deposit securities into, and
receive securities from, the fund in connection with the purchase and
redemption of Creation Units; and (e) certain registered management
investment companies and unit investment trusts outside of the same
group of investment companies as the funds (``Funds of Funds'') to
acquire Shares.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

APPLICANTS: Global X Funds (the ``Trust''), a Delaware statutory trust
registered under the Act as an open-end management investment company
with multiple series, Global X Management Company LLC (the
``Adviser''), a Delaware limited liability company registered as an
investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and SEI
Investments Distribution Company (the ``Distributor''), a Pennsylvania
corporation and broker-dealer registered under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'').

FILING DATES: The application was filed on September 18, 2015, and
amended on June 3, 2016 and August 31, 2016.

HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's
Secretary and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally
or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by
5:30 p.m. on October 11, 2016, and should be accompanied by proof of
service on applicants, in the form of an affidavit, or for lawyers, a
certificate of service. Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing
requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, any facts
bearing upon the desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason
for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be
notified of a hearing may request notification by writing to the
Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090; Applicants: Global X Funds and Global X
Management Company LLC, 600 Lexington Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, NY
10022; SEI Investments Distribution Company, 1 Freedom Valley Drive,
Oaks, PA 19456.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara T. Heussler, Senior Counsel at
(202) 551-6990, or Mary Kay Frech, Branch Chief, at<PHONE_NUMBER>
(Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's Web site by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Summary of the Application

    1. Applicants request an order that would allow funds to operate as
index exchange traded funds (``ETFs'') and for which an Affiliated
Person (as defined below) will serve as the index provider (each a
``Self-Indexing Fund'') .\1\ The Self-Indexing Fund Shares will be
purchased and redeemed at their NAV in Creation Units only. All orders
to purchase Creation Units and all redemption requests will be placed
by or through an ``Authorized Participant'', which will have signed a
participant

agreement with the Distributor. Shares will be listed and traded
individually on a national securities exchange, where share prices will
be based on the current bid/offer market. Any order granting the
requested relief would be subject to the terms and conditions stated in
the application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Applicants request that the order apply to any series of the
Trust and any other open-end management investment companies or
series thereof (each, included in the term ``Self-Indexing Funds''),
each of which will operate as an ETF and will track a specified
index comprised of domestic or foreign equity and/or fixed income
securities (each, an ``Underlying Index''). Any Self-Indexing Fund
will (a) be advised by the Adviser or an entity controlling,
controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser (included in
the term ``Adviser'') and (b) comply with the terms and conditions
of the application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Each Self-Indexing Fund will hold investment positions selected
to correspond to the performance of an Underlying Index. An affiliated
person, as defined in section 2(a)(3) of the Act (``Affiliated
Person''), or an affiliated person of an Affiliated Person (``Second-
Tier Affiliate''), of a Trust or a Self-Indexing Fund, of the Adviser,
of any sub-adviser to or promoter of a Self-Indexing Fund, or of the
Distributor will compile, create, sponsor or maintain the Underlying
Index.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Each Self-Indexing Fund will post on its Web site the
identities and quantities of the investment positions that will form
the basis for the Self-Indexing Fund's calculation of its NAV at the
end of the day. Applicants believe that requiring Self-Indexing
Funds to maintain full portfolio transparency will help address,
together with other protections, conflicts of interest with respect
to such Self-Indexing Funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. Shares will be purchased and redeemed in Creation Units and
generally on an in-kind basis. Except where the purchase or redemption
will include cash under the limited circumstances specified in the
application, purchasers will be required to purchase Creation Units by
depositing specified instruments (``Deposit Instruments''), and
shareholders redeeming their Shares will receive specified instruments
(``Redemption Instruments''). The Deposit Instruments and the
Redemption Instruments will each correspond pro rata to the positions
in the Self-Indexing Fund's portfolio (including cash positions) except
as specified in the application.
    4. Because Shares will not be individually redeemable, applicants
request an exemption from section 5(a)(1) and section 2(a)(32) of the
Act that would permit the Self-Indexing Funds to register as open-end
management investment companies and issue Shares that are redeemable in
Creation Units only.
    5. Applicants also request an exemption from section 22(d) of the
Act and rule 22c-1 under the Act as secondary market trading in Shares
will take place at negotiated prices, not at a current offering price
described in a Fund's prospectus, and not at a price based on NAV.
Applicants state that (a) secondary market trading in Shares does not
involve a Self-Indexing Fund as a party and will not result in dilution
of an investment in Shares, and (b) to the extent different prices
exist during a given trading day, or from day to day, such variances
occur as a result of third-party market forces, such as supply and
demand. Therefore, applicants assert that secondary market transactions
in Shares will not lead to discrimination or preferential treatment
among purchasers. Finally, applicants represent that share market
prices will be disciplined by arbitrage opportunities, which should
prevent Shares from trading at a material discount or premium from NAV.
    6. With respect to Self-Indexing Funds that effect creations and
redemptions of Creation Units in-kind and that are based on certain
Underlying Indexes that include foreign securities, applicants request
relief from the requirement imposed by section 22(e) in order to allow
such Self-Indexing Funds to pay redemption proceeds within fourteen
calendar days following the tender of Creation Units for redemption.
Applicants assert that the requested relief would not be inconsistent
with the spirit and intent of section 22(e) to prevent unreasonable,
undisclosed or unforeseen delays in the actual payment of redemption
proceeds.
    7. Applicants request an exemption to permit Funds of Funds to
acquire Shares of the Self-Indexing Funds beyond the limits of section
12(d)(1)(A) of the Act; and the Self-Indexing Funds, and any principal
underwriter for the Self-Indexing Funds, and/or any broker or dealer
registered under the Exchange Act, to sell Shares to Funds of Funds
beyond the limits of section 12(d)(1)(B) of the Act. The application's
terms and conditions are designed to, among other things, help prevent
any potential (i) undue influence over a Self-Indexing Fund through
control or voting power, or in connection with certain services,
transactions, and underwritings, (ii) excessive layering of fees, and
(iii) overly complex fund structures, which are the concerns underlying
the limits in sections 12(d)(1)(A) and (B) of the Act.
    8. Applicants request an exemption from sections 17(a)(1) and
17(a)(2) of the Act to permit persons that are Affiliated Persons, or
Second Tier Affiliates, of the Self-Indexing Funds, solely by virtue of
certain ownership interests, to effectuate purchases and redemptions
in-kind. The deposit procedures for in-kind purchases of Creation Units
and the redemption procedures for in-kind redemptions of Creation Units
will be the same for all purchases and redemptions and Deposit
Instruments and Redemption Instruments will be valued in the same
manner as those investment positions currently held by the Self-
Indexing Funds. Applicants also seek relief from the prohibitions on
affiliated transactions in section 17(a) to permit a Self-Indexing Fund
to sell its Shares to and redeem its Shares from a Fund of Funds, and
to engage in the accompanying in-kind transactions with the Fund of
Funds.\3\ The purchase of Creation Units by a Fund of Funds directly
from a Self-Indexing Fund will be accomplished in accordance with the
policies of the Fund of Funds and will be based on the NAVs of the
Self-Indexing Funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The requested relief would apply to direct sales of Shares
in Creation Units by a Self-Indexing Fund to a Fund of Funds and
redemptions of those Shares. Applicants, moreover, are not seeking
relief from section 17(a) for, and the requested relief will not
apply to, transactions where a Self-Indexing Fund could be deemed an
Affiliated Person, or a Second-Tier Affiliate, of a Fund of Funds
because an Adviser or an entity controlling, controlled by or under
common control with an Adviser provides investment advisory services
to that Fund of Funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    9. Section 6(c) of the Act permits the Commission to exempt any
persons or transactions from any provision of the Act if such exemption
is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with
the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the
policy and provisions of the Act. Section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act
provides that the Commission may exempt any person, security, or
transaction, or any class or classes of persons, securities, or
transactions, from any provision of section 12(d)(1) if the exemption
is consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors.
Section 17(b) of the Act authorizes the Commission to grant an order
permitting a transaction otherwise prohibited by section 17(a) if it
finds that (a) the terms of the proposed transaction are fair and
reasonable and do not involve overreaching on the part of any person
concerned; (b) the proposed transaction is consistent with the policies
of each registered investment company involved; and (c) the proposed
transaction is consistent with the general purposes of the Act.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-22542 Filed 9-19-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


	UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

	WASHINGTON, D.C.  20460

Date: 2/1/07

Chemical: 067710

DP Barcode: 293793, 335124

Subject:	Revised EFED drinking water exposure assessment to support the Section 3 for indoxacarb use on Brassica leafy vegetables, turnip greens, grape, and fire ants and Section 18 for indoxacarb use on Swiss Chard in California.

To: 		Shaja Brothers

Insecticides Branch

Reregistration Division (7508C)

and

Pramond Terse, DVM, Ph.D., DABVT, Toxicologist

Risk Assessment Branch 1

Health Effects Division (7509C)

From: 		James Hetrick, Ph.D., Senior Scientist

Nancy Andrews, Branch Chief

Thuy Nguyen, RAPL

Environmental Risk Branch I

Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507C)

This memorandum is a revised drinking water assessment to support indoxacarb use on Brassica leafy vegetables, turnip greens, grape, and fire ants (D293793) and the proposed Section 18 for indoxacarb use on swiss chard in California (D335124).  This assessment supplants the original drinking water assessment dated on 6/8/04.  The drinking water assessment was revised to clarify and correct application rates and model output for current and proposed uses of indoxacarb.  The highest indoxacarb concentrations in surface and ground source water are associated with cotton.  This use pattern has a maximum label rate of 0.11 lbs ai/A (0.15 lbs KN128+KN127/A).  Similar use rates are recommended for apples, potatoes, and grapes (Draft Label for DuPont( Avaunt®).  Tier II surface water modeling for cotton using the index reservoir with the default percent cropped area (PCA=0.87) predicts the 1 in 10 year peak (acute) concentration of DPX-JW062 residues of 25.1 μg/L.  The 1 in 10 year annual average concentration (non-cancer chronic) and 36 year annual average concentration (cancer) of DPX-JW062 residues are not likely to exceed 5.4 and 2.8 μg/L, respectively.  SCI-GROW modeling indicates concentrations of DPX-JW062 are not expected to exceed 0.21 μg/L.

Background

This water assessment evaluated indoxacarb use for cotton, apples, cabbage, peppers, potatoes, turf, and swiss chard.  Multiple crop scenarios were evaluated to assess the impact of crop cultural conditions (pesticide use rate, geographic location, agronomic practices, etc.) on indoxacarb concentrations in drinking water (Table 1).  Modeling scenarios with the highest potential runoff (East of the Mississippi River) were evaluated in this assessment. The maximum total isomer application rate (bolded) was used in the modeling. This modeling approach was used to provide a conservative drinking water screening assessment.

Table 1: Proposed Uses of Indoxacarb with Label Recommended Application Regimes

Crop	State	Number of

Applications	Application Interval

(days)	Maximum Single Rate

(kg KN128/ha)	Maximum

Single Rate

(kg KN128 +KN127/ha)

Cotton	MS	4	5	0.12	0.16

Turf	FL	2	84	0.003	0.004

Apples	NC	4	7	0.12	0.16

Cabbage	FL	4	3	0.072	0.096

Potatoes	ME	4	5	0.12	0.16

Swiss Chard	CA	2	5	0.12	0.16

1- Label recommended cropping season application rates (Draft Label DuPont( Avaunt®)

2- Corrected application rate calculated by multiplying label rate by 1.33.  This factor was derived using following equation: % KN128 (75%) + %KN127 (25%)/%KN128 (75%).

A cumulative residue modeling approach was used to account for the environmental fate and transport of  R and S isomers of indoxacarb plus degradation products with toxicological concern (JT333, KG4333, KT413, ML437-0H) (D267726).   These residues were designated by the Health Effect Division’s Metabolite Assessment Review Committee (MARC) as being indoxacarb residues of human-health toxicological concern.  Surface water modeling was conducted using the PRZM-EXAMS shell PE4V01, 8/13/03.  Groundwater modeling was conducted using SCI-GROW 2.3, 7/29/03.

Label application rates were adjusted for total isomer concentration.   Environmental fate properties for the cumulative residues were the same as those used in drinking water assessment for cotton (D267726).  One notable exception is that an adsorption coefficient for IN-KG433 was used in the assessment because it has the lowest non-sand Kf and Koc of the indoxacarb residues with toxicological concern (Table 2).

Table 2: Adsorption Coefficient for Metabolites of Indoxacarb

Metabolite

Kf

Average Koc

MRID Reference

IN-JT333

96

NA

457958-09

IN-KT413

2.2

422

459067-02

IN-KG433

1.4

400

 457958-06

NA- Not applicable because there was no clear linear relationship between OC and Kf.

Surface Water Assessment

PRZM-EXAMS input parameters and output files are shown in Appendix A.   The highest indoxacarb residue concentrations are associated with the Mississippi cotton scenario (Table 3).  All scenarios except turf were modeled assuming foliar application (CAM 2) with no soil incorporation.   The turf scenario was conducted assuming a broadcast soil application (CAM 4) with 0.1 cm soil incorporation.  Application dates were selected according to recommended pest control timing: turf-fire ant (label recommendation), apples-codling moth (http://ipm.ncsu.edu /apple/chptr2.html), cabbage-diamondback moth (http://edis.ifas.edu/BODY_P1042), sweet corn-fall armyworm (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/BODY_P1034), and  potato-Colorado potato beetle (http://pro.umext.maine.edu/potatoes/cpb.pdt).

Table 3: Default PCA corrected PRZM -EXAMS  Indoxacarb Residue Concentrations (µg/L)

Scenario

1 in 10 year peak

1 in 10 year annual average

30 year annual average

Cotton (MS)	25.068	5.373	2.782

Turf (FL)1	0.05	0.014	0.008

Apples (NC)	18.093	4.738	2.560

Cabbage (FL)	8.275	1.940	1.185

Potato (ME)	11.083	5.346	3.961

Swiss Chard (CA)

Aerial Application	9.220	3.788	2.643

Swiss Chard (CA)

Ground  Application	9.173	3.564	2.379

1- The default PCA correction (0.87) was not used for turf because this use pattern was not considered in development of  PCAs .

Ground Water Assessment

SCI-GROW  input parameters and output file are shown in Appendix B.  The highest indoxacarb residue concentrations (0.206 ug/L) are associated with cotton, apples, and potatoes (Table 4).  The total isomer application rate for these uses is 0.5714 lbs KN128 +KN127 isomers/A/crop season.

Table 4: SCI-GROW Indoxacarb Residue Concentrations (µg/L)

Scenario

Concentration

Cotton (MS)

0.206

Turf (FL)

0.003

Apples (NC)

0.206

Cabbage (FL)

0.124

Potatoes (ME)

0.206

Swiss Chard (CA)

0.103

Uncertainties, Assumptions, and Limitations

Uncertainties, assumptions, and limitations of the simulation modeling are as follows:

PRZM-EXAMS scenarios are regionally representative for each crop. They may not represent the most conservative runoff or spray drift situation for each and every crop.  It is assumed focusing on several scenarios in higher runoff areas such as the eastern United States will capture upper end indoxacarb residue concentrations in drinking water.

The cumulative residue modeling method assumes environmental fate properties for indoxacarb and its degradation products (JT333, KG4333, KT413, ML437-0H) are similar.  This modeling approach provides a conservative assessment process for consideration of simultaneous formation and decline of indoxacarb residues.  However, it is likely to provide conservative estimates because minor degradation products (<10% of applied) may dictate the environmental fate properties for all indoxacarb residues.

The inactive isomer (KN-127) was assumed to have equivalent toxicity as the active isomer (KN-128).  Application rates for indoxacarb were adjusted to account for the  presence of the inactive isomer.

Monitoring data are not available to evaluate the prediction potential of PRZM/EXAMS and SCIGROW simulation modeling.

Uncertainties, limitations, and assumptions stated in the previous indoxacarb water assessments (D267726) are applicable in this assessment.

APPENDIX  A- PRZM/EXAMS OUTPUT FILES

MS COTTON

stored as MSCOT.out

Chemical: Indoxacarb

PRZM environment: MScottonC.txt	modified Wedday, 22 January 2003 at 09:52:38

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 14:34:12

Metfile: w03940.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 08:05:46

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	29.01	27.5	25.74	20.59	18.31	6.299

1962	4.233	4.125	3.729	3.002	2.583	1.862

1963	20.06	18.98	15.2	9.921	7.941	2.731

1964	19.29	18.53	16.11	13.98	12.15	5.071

1965	15.3	14.52	11.84	8.257	6.587	2.974

1966	9.414	9.024	7.401	5.217	4.32	1.969

1967	18.85	17.91	15.8	12.9	12.07	4.622

1968	4.032	3.93	3.565	2.865	2.463	1.694

1969	4.666	4.42	3.567	2.839	2.721	1.136

1970	15.14	14.53	13.35	12.23	11.16	4.3

1971	7.492	7.097	6.147	4.665	4.325	2.537

1972	3.32	3.145	2.66	2.073	1.807	0.9595

1973	8.079	7.69	7.083	5.451	5.068	2.194

1974	5.159	4.9	4.248	3.665	3.169	1.893

1975	23.31	22.48	19.95	13.91	11	3.842

1976	22.08	20.89	17.3	13.55	13.02	5.07

1977	7.956	7.535	6.128	5.257	4.61	2.326

1978	4.838	4.572	3.765	2.887	2.422	1.396

1979	59.89	57.84	49.94	38.27	31.73	10.41

1980	5.382	5.261	4.811	3.997	3.508	2.126

1981	27.05	26.01	20.8	13.52	10.67	3.47

1982	36.44	34.49	30.51	24.46	20.25	7.66

1983	5.379	5.096	4.261	3.265	2.996	2.207

1984	6.075	5.754	4.767	4.355	3.998	1.795

1985	23.63	22.37	18.16	13.24	11.91	4.554

1986	7.028	6.645	5.346	4.535	3.848	2.003

1987	6.101	5.775	5.298	4.109	3.585	1.438

1988	12.17	11.67	10.04	8.582	8.439	3.776

1989	8.964	8.494	7.227	5.028	4.207	2.485

1990	3.426	3.258	2.765	1.972	1.786	1.125

Sorted results

Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	59.89	57.84	49.94	38.27	31.73	10.41

0.0645161290322581	36.44	34.49	30.51	24.46	20.25	7.66

0.0967741935483871	29.01	27.5	25.74	20.59	18.31	6.299

0.129032258064516	27.05	26.01	20.8	13.98	13.02	5.071

0.161290322580645	23.63	22.48	19.95	13.91	12.15	5.07

0.193548387096774	23.31	22.37	18.16	13.55	12.07	4.622

0.225806451612903	22.08	20.89	17.3	13.52	11.91	4.554

0.258064516129032	20.06	18.98	16.11	13.24	11.16	4.3

0.290322580645161	19.29	18.53	15.8	12.9	11	3.842

0.32258064516129	18.85	17.91	15.2	12.23	10.67	3.776

0.354838709677419	15.3	14.53	13.35	9.921	8.439	3.47

0.387096774193548	15.14	14.52	11.84	8.582	7.941	2.974

0.419354838709677	12.17	11.67	10.04	8.257	6.587	2.731

0.451612903225806	9.414	9.024	7.401	5.451	5.068	2.537

0.483870967741936	8.964	8.494	7.227	5.257	4.61	2.485

0.516129032258065	8.079	7.69	7.083	5.217	4.325	2.326

0.548387096774194	7.956	7.535	6.147	5.028	4.32	2.207

0.580645161290323	7.492	7.097	6.128	4.665	4.207	2.194

0.612903225806452	7.028	6.645	5.346	4.535	3.998	2.126

0.645161290322581	6.101	5.775	5.298	4.355	3.848	2.003

0.67741935483871	6.075	5.754	4.811	4.109	3.585	1.969

0.709677419354839	5.382	5.261	4.767	3.997	3.508	1.893

0.741935483870968	5.379	5.096	4.261	3.665	3.169	1.862

0.774193548387097	5.159	4.9	4.248	3.265	2.996	1.795

0.806451612903226	4.838	4.572	3.765	3.002	2.721	1.694

0.838709677419355	4.666	4.42	3.729	2.887	2.583	1.438

0.870967741935484	4.233	4.125	3.567	2.865	2.463	1.396

0.903225806451613	4.032	3.93	3.565	2.839	2.422	1.136

0.935483870967742	3.426	3.258	2.765	2.073	1.807	1.125

0.967741935483871	3.32	3.145	2.66	1.972	1.786	0.9595

0.1	28.814	27.351	25.246	19.929	17.781	6.1762

					Average of yearly averages:	3.19748333333333

Inputs generated by pe4.pl - 8-August-2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: MSCOT

Metfile:	w03940.dvf

PRZM scenario:	MScottonC.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	Indoxacarb

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	527	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	6E-10	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	1E-9	torr

Solubility	sol	8	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	400	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp		days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	71.13	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	577	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	264	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7		days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	0.16	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.95	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.16	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	15-6	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	5	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Interval 2	interval	5	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Interval 3	interval	5	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17:	FILTRA

	IPSCND	1

	UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

	PLDKRT

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	IR

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

FL TURF

stored as FLTURF.out

Chemical: Indoxacarb

PRZM environment: FLturfC.txt	modified Monday, 16 June 2003 at 12:48:06

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 14:34:12

Metfile: w12834.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 08:04:28

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	0.03304	0.03188	0.02774	0.02179	0.01861	0.00709

1962	0.02024	0.0196	0.01744	0.01547	0.01398	0.008653

1963	0.02113	0.02041	0.01793	0.01396	0.01279	0.008524

1964	0.05625	0.05427	0.04836	0.04247	0.03695	0.01539

1965	0.02798	0.02712	0.02397	0.01892	0.01619	0.009977

1966	0.02786	0.02692	0.02411	0.02046	0.0188	0.008908

1967	0.02113	0.02048	0.01817	0.01441	0.01245	0.006964

1968	0.03794	0.03697	0.03281	0.02578	0.02284	0.01375

1969	0.04595	0.04438	0.03925	0.03646	0.03244	0.01499

1970	0.01515	0.01495	0.01416	0.0126	0.0115	0.005571

1971	0.01779	0.01721	0.01496	0.01236	0.01166	0.006638

1972	0.04935	0.04767	0.04146	0.03159	0.02764	0.01291

1973	0.01753	0.01694	0.0153	0.01356	0.0119	0.007803

1974	0.034	0.03282	0.02871	0.02677	0.02403	0.009945

1975	0.01777	0.01717	0.01508	0.01201	0.01033	0.00659

1976	0.02101	0.02035	0.01823	0.01582	0.01363	0.008576

1977	0.03025	0.02921	0.02691	0.02211	0.01899	0.009167

1978	0.0317	0.03057	0.02642	0.02084	0.01868	0.01054

1979	0.02291	0.02224	0.02019	0.01696	0.01666	0.008767

1980	0.009076	0.008768	0.008229	0.006557	0.005843	0.004382

1981	0.03324	0.03214	0.02936	0.02419	0.02067	0.007685

1982	0.01884	0.01822	0.01609	0.0126	0.01183	0.007551

1983	0.03726	0.03599	0.03221	0.02787	0.02425	0.01237

1984	0.04654	0.04516	0.0398	0.0308	0.02609	0.01389

1985	0.009434	0.009129	0.007995	0.006855	0.006277	0.005229

1986	0.01058	0.01022	0.009135	0.008048	0.007509	0.004061

1987	0.006493	0.00628	0.005507	0.004608	0.00427	0.002716

1988	0.009254	0.008938	0.007818	0.006177	0.005512	0.003074

1989	0.0146	0.01431	0.01296	0.01024	0.008553	0.003214

1990	0.01461	0.01409	0.01219	0.009506	0.008515	0.004341

Sorted results

Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	0.05625	0.05427	0.04836	0.04247	0.03695	0.01539

0.0645161290322581	0.04935	0.04767	0.04146	0.03646	0.03244	0.01499

0.0967741935483871	0.04654	0.04516	0.0398	0.03159	0.02764	0.01389

0.129032258064516	0.04595	0.04438	0.03925	0.0308	0.02609	0.01375

0.161290322580645	0.03794	0.03697	0.03281	0.02787	0.02425	0.01291

0.193548387096774	0.03726	0.03599	0.03221	0.02677	0.02403	0.01237

0.225806451612903	0.034	0.03282	0.02936	0.02578	0.02284	0.01054

0.258064516129032	0.03324	0.03214	0.02871	0.02419	0.02067	0.009977

0.290322580645161	0.03304	0.03188	0.02774	0.02211	0.01899	0.009945

0.32258064516129	0.0317	0.03057	0.02691	0.02179	0.0188	0.009167

0.354838709677419	0.03025	0.02921	0.02642	0.02084	0.01868	0.008908

0.387096774193548	0.02798	0.02712	0.02411	0.02046	0.01861	0.008767

0.419354838709677	0.02786	0.02692	0.02397	0.01892	0.01666	0.008653

0.451612903225806	0.02291	0.02224	0.02019	0.01696	0.01619	0.008576

0.483870967741936	0.02113	0.02048	0.01823	0.01582	0.01398	0.008524

0.516129032258065	0.02113	0.02041	0.01817	0.01547	0.01363	0.007803

0.548387096774194	0.02101	0.02035	0.01793	0.01441	0.01279	0.007685

0.580645161290323	0.02024	0.0196	0.01744	0.01396	0.01245	0.007551

0.612903225806452	0.01884	0.01822	0.01609	0.01356	0.0119	0.00709

0.645161290322581	0.01779	0.01721	0.0153	0.0126	0.01183	0.006964

0.67741935483871	0.01777	0.01717	0.01508	0.0126	0.01166	0.006638

0.709677419354839	0.01753	0.01694	0.01496	0.01236	0.0115	0.00659

0.741935483870968	0.01515	0.01495	0.01416	0.01201	0.01033	0.005571

0.774193548387097	0.01461	0.01431	0.01296	0.01024	0.008553	0.005229

0.806451612903226	0.0146	0.01409	0.01219	0.009506	0.008515	0.004382

0.838709677419355	0.01058	0.01022	0.009135	0.008048	0.007509	0.004341

0.870967741935484	0.009434	0.009129	0.008229	0.006855	0.006277	0.004061

0.903225806451613	0.009254	0.008938	0.007995	0.006557	0.005843	0.003214

0.935483870967742	0.009076	0.008768	0.007818	0.006177	0.005512	0.003074

0.967741935483871	0.006493	0.00628	0.005507	0.004608	0.00427	0.002716

0.1	0.046481	0.045082	0.039745	0.031511	0.027485	0.013876

					Average of yearly averages:	0.00830886666666667

Inputs generated by pe4.pl - 8-August-2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: FLTURF

Metfile:	w12834.dvf

PRZM scenario:	FLturfC.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	Indoxacarb

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	527	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	6E-10	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	1E-9	torr

Solubility	sol	8	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	400	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp		days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	71.13	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	577	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	264	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7		days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0.1	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	0.002	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	1.00	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.00	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	15-5	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	84	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17:	FILTRA

	IPSCND	1

	UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

	PLDKRT

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	IR

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

NC APPLE

stored as NCAPPL.out

Chemical: Indoxacarb

PRZM environment: NCappleC.txt	modified Satday, 12 October 2002 at 15:09:36

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 14:34:12

Metfile: w03812.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 08:05:50

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1965	7.836	7.607	6.987	5.835	5.159	1.946

1966	11.69	11.35	10.07	8.091	7.176	3.11

1967	13.26	12.87	11.83	10.17	8.943	3.969

1968	11.16	10.82	9.547	7.719	6.619	3.139

1969	5.378	5.21	4.618	3.992	3.661	1.927

1970	3.848	3.733	3.305	2.923	2.847	1.48

1971	6.647	6.439	5.741	4.814	4.281	1.893

1972	12.21	11.85	10.46	8.101	6.91	2.951

1973	21.07	20.55	19.15	15.99	13.69	5.421

1974	6.867	6.68	6.215	5.39	4.868	2.701

1975	12.55	12.17	11.49	9.106	7.779	3.304

1976	20.68	20.14	18.77	15.72	13.43	5.503

1977	6.103	5.93	5.502	4.806	4.281	2.543

1978	6.665	6.46	5.68	4.477	4.193	2.08

1979	7.592	7.364	6.541	5.542	4.826	2.173

1980	7.726	7.488	6.564	5.973	5.398	2.352

1981	17.99	17.52	15.77	12.5	10.54	4.147

1982	8.132	7.884	7.095	5.956	5.306	2.689

1983	6.786	6.582	5.815	4.628	4.009	1.907

1984	8.723	8.459	7.516	6.428	5.804	2.515

1985	3.787	3.676	3.281	3.013	2.805	1.584

1986	4.998	4.84	4.391	3.598	3.171	1.633

1987	32.59	31.55	29.42	24.17	20.32	7.525

1988	4.997	4.866	4.458	3.89	3.776	2.849

1989	8.717	8.497	8.233	6.795	5.811	2.559

1990	8.245	7.982	7.07	5.652	5.306	2.622

Sorted results

Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.037037037037037	32.59	31.55	29.42	24.17	20.32	7.525

0.0740740740740741	21.07	20.55	19.15	15.99	13.69	5.503

0.111111111111111	20.68	20.14	18.77	15.72	13.43	5.421

0.148148148148148	17.99	17.52	15.77	12.5	10.54	4.147

0.185185185185185	13.26	12.87	11.83	10.17	8.943	3.969

0.222222222222222	12.55	12.17	11.49	9.106	7.779	3.304

0.259259259259259	12.21	11.85	10.46	8.101	7.176	3.139

0.296296296296296	11.69	11.35	10.07	8.091	6.91	3.11

0.333333333333333	11.16	10.82	9.547	7.719	6.619	2.951

0.37037037037037	8.723	8.497	8.233	6.795	5.811	2.849

0.407407407407407	8.717	8.459	7.516	6.428	5.804	2.701

0.444444444444444	8.245	7.982	7.095	5.973	5.398	2.689

0.481481481481481	8.132	7.884	7.07	5.956	5.306	2.622

0.518518518518518	7.836	7.607	6.987	5.835	5.306	2.559

0.555555555555556	7.726	7.488	6.564	5.652	5.159	2.543

0.592592592592593	7.592	7.364	6.541	5.542	4.868	2.515

0.62962962962963	6.867	6.68	6.215	5.39	4.826	2.352

0.666666666666667	6.786	6.582	5.815	4.814	4.281	2.173

0.703703703703704	6.665	6.46	5.741	4.806	4.281	2.08

0.740740740740741	6.647	6.439	5.68	4.628	4.193	1.946

0.777777777777778	6.103	5.93	5.502	4.477	4.009	1.927

0.814814814814815	5.378	5.21	4.618	3.992	3.776	1.907

0.851851851851852	4.998	4.866	4.458	3.89	3.661	1.893

0.888888888888889	4.997	4.84	4.391	3.598	3.171	1.633

0.925925925925926	3.848	3.733	3.305	3.013	2.847	1.584

0.962962962962963	3.787	3.676	3.281	2.923	2.805	1.48

0.1	20.797	20.263	18.884	15.801	13.508	5.4456

					Average of yearly averages:	2.94315384615385

Inputs generated by pe4.pl - 8-August-2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: NCAPPL

Metfile:	w03812.dvf

PRZM scenario:	NCappleC.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	Indoxacarb

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	527	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	6E-10	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	1E-9	torr

Solubility	sol	8	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	400	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp		days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	71.13	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	577	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	264	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7		days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	0.16	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.95	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.16	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	15-5	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	7	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Interval 2	interval	7	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Interval 3	interval	7	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17:	FILTRA

	IPSCND	1

	UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

	PLDKRT

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	IR

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

FL CABBAGE

stored as FLCab.out

Chemical: Indoxacarb

PRZM environment: FLcabbageC.txt	modified Satday, 12 October 2002 at 14:39:00

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 14:34:12

Metfile: w12842.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 08:04:28

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	6.574	6.335	3.956	1.385	0.9231	0.2276

1962	6.142	5.93	5.146	3.886	3.425	1.396

1963	5.018	4.864	4.465	3.573	3.024	1.271

1964	9.592	9.263	8.063	6.732	5.697	2.099

1965	3.798	3.666	2.368	1.945	1.852	0.8544

1966	6.238	6.032	5.576	4.469	3.903	1.522

1967	3.796	3.669	3.336	2.559	2.165	0.9601

1968	2.175	2.103	1.575	1.304	1.238	0.7275

1969	5.49	5.375	4.942	4.121	3.625	1.737

1970	5.687	5.505	4.892	4.562	4.107	1.564

1971	7.859	7.58	6.609	4.972	4.205	1.83

1972	5.782	5.588	5.124	4.36	3.697	1.554

1973	5.977	5.769	3.766	3.403	2.938	1.199

1974	5.469	5.255	4.474	3.279	2.844	1.304

1975	2.728	2.632	2.277	1.813	1.543	0.753

1976	3.439	3.329	2.871	2.065	1.709	0.9996

1977	4.453	4.313	3.787	3.107	2.669	1.01

1978	5.602	5.393	3.572	3.106	2.766	1.17

1979	8.782	8.486	7.571	6.38	5.807	2.244

1980	2.619	2.538	2.262	2.096	1.971	0.9068

1981	14.31	13.81	11.93	9.03	7.454	2.943

1982	11.8	11.4	10.35	8.228	7.067	2.563

1983	6.401	6.226	5.658	4.771	4.057	1.614

1984	4.771	4.613	4.076	3.356	3.084	1.222

1985	2.183	2.11	1.593	1.445	1.411	0.8028

1986	4.681	4.514	3.936	2.925	2.41	1.233

1987	4.349	4.215	3.712	3.171	3.047	1.292

1988	4.518	4.367	3.873	3.499	3.225	1.349

1989	4.456	4.307	3.035	2.414	2.135	1.021

1990	5.48	5.279	4.655	3.892	3.504	1.478

Sorted results

Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	14.31	13.81	11.93	9.03	7.454	2.943

0.0645161290322581	11.8	11.4	10.35	8.228	7.067	2.563

0.0967741935483871	9.592	9.263	8.063	6.732	5.807	2.244

0.129032258064516	8.782	8.486	7.571	6.38	5.697	2.099

0.161290322580645	7.859	7.58	6.609	4.972	4.205	1.83

0.193548387096774	6.574	6.335	5.658	4.771	4.107	1.737

0.225806451612903	6.401	6.226	5.576	4.562	4.057	1.614

0.258064516129032	6.238	6.032	5.146	4.469	3.903	1.564

0.290322580645161	6.142	5.93	5.124	4.36	3.697	1.554

0.32258064516129	5.977	5.769	4.942	4.121	3.625	1.522

0.354838709677419	5.782	5.588	4.892	3.892	3.504	1.478

0.387096774193548	5.687	5.505	4.655	3.886	3.425	1.396

0.419354838709677	5.602	5.393	4.474	3.573	3.225	1.349

0.451612903225806	5.49	5.375	4.465	3.499	3.084	1.304

0.483870967741936	5.48	5.279	4.076	3.403	3.047	1.292

0.516129032258065	5.469	5.255	3.956	3.356	3.024	1.271

0.548387096774194	5.018	4.864	3.936	3.279	2.938	1.233

0.580645161290323	4.771	4.613	3.873	3.171	2.844	1.222

0.612903225806452	4.681	4.514	3.787	3.107	2.766	1.199

0.645161290322581	4.518	4.367	3.766	3.106	2.669	1.17

0.67741935483871	4.456	4.313	3.712	2.925	2.41	1.021

0.709677419354839	4.453	4.307	3.572	2.559	2.165	1.01

0.741935483870968	4.349	4.215	3.336	2.414	2.135	0.9996

0.774193548387097	3.798	3.669	3.035	2.096	1.971	0.9601

0.806451612903226	3.796	3.666	2.871	2.065	1.852	0.9068

0.838709677419355	3.439	3.329	2.368	1.945	1.709	0.8544

0.870967741935484	2.728	2.632	2.277	1.813	1.543	0.8028

0.903225806451613	2.619	2.538	2.262	1.445	1.411	0.753

0.935483870967742	2.183	2.11	1.593	1.385	1.238	0.7275

0.967741935483871	2.175	2.103	1.575	1.304	0.9231	0.2276

0.1	9.511	9.1853	8.0138	6.6968	5.796	2.2295

					Average of yearly averages:	1.36156

Inputs generated by pe4.pl - 8-August-2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: FLCab

Metfile:	w12842.dvf

PRZM scenario:	FLcabbageC.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	Indoxacarb

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	527	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	6E-10	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	1E-9	torr

Solubility	sol	8	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	400	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp		days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	71.13	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	577	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	264	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7		days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	0.096	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.95	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.16	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	15-12	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	3	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Interval 2	interval	3	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Interval 3	interval	3	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17:	FILTRA

	IPSCND	1

	UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

	PLDKRT

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	IR

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

ME POTATOES

stored as MEPot.out

Chemical: Indoxacarb

PRZM environment: MEpotatoC.txt	modified Satday, 12 October 2002 at 15:03:32

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 14:34:12

Metfile: w14607.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 08:05:36

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	6.543	6.395	5.912	5.599	5.236	2.341

1962	13.21	12.92	12.25	10.55	9.73	5.336

1963	7.597	7.442	7.292	6.749	6.512	5.064

1964	8.08	7.893	7.179	6.142	5.72	4.269

1965	5.103	4.992	4.688	4.448	4.384	3.528

1966	5.195	5.11	4.779	4.395	3.932	2.793

1967	8.785	8.568	7.804	7.271	7.167	4.457

1968	8.783	8.59	8.16	7.273	6.548	4.748

1969	10.17	9.963	9.201	7.995	7.664	5.258

1970	10.92	10.71	9.922	8.542	7.829	5.068

1971	6.31	6.175	5.7	4.934	4.538	3.864

1972	9.548	9.357	8.625	7.84	7.357	4.277

1973	12.37	12.06	11.06	9.268	8.309	5.096

1974	5.994	5.858	5.414	4.751	4.703	3.828

1975	5.904	5.759	5.319	4.774	4.496	2.964

1976	12.78	12.49	11.43	10.74	10.13	5.566

1977	10.79	10.53	10.13	9.085	8.663	5.819

1978	12.1	11.83	10.96	9.262	8.539	5.366

1979	8.146	7.98	7.641	6.611	6.106	4.525

1980	7.191	7.024	6.434	5.783	5.391	3.779

1981	21.01	20.46	18.5	15.44	14	6.598

1982	11.83	11.57	11.06	10.34	9.813	6.875

1983	11.55	11.29	10.4	9.868	9.164	6.181

1984	10.75	10.53	9.74	8.869	8.012	5.202

1985	6.829	6.667	6.212	5.506	5.048	3.524

1986	7.881	7.701	7.103	6.645	6.283	3.966

1987	6.552	6.404	6	5.494	5.126	3.653

1988	5.721	5.586	5.051	4.755	4.702	3.339

1989	10.51	10.35	9.4	8.029	7.232	4.052

1990	9.546	9.328	8.753	7.756	7.491	5.261

Sorted results

Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	21.01	20.46	18.5	15.44	14	6.875

0.0645161290322581	13.21	12.92	12.25	10.74	10.13	6.598

0.0967741935483871	12.78	12.49	11.43	10.55	9.813	6.181

0.129032258064516	12.37	12.06	11.06	10.34	9.73	5.819

0.161290322580645	12.1	11.83	11.06	9.868	9.164	5.566

0.193548387096774	11.83	11.57	10.96	9.268	8.663	5.366

0.225806451612903	11.55	11.29	10.4	9.262	8.539	5.336

0.258064516129032	10.92	10.71	10.13	9.085	8.309	5.261

0.290322580645161	10.79	10.53	9.922	8.869	8.012	5.258

0.32258064516129	10.75	10.53	9.74	8.542	7.829	5.202

0.354838709677419	10.51	10.35	9.4	8.029	7.664	5.096

0.387096774193548	10.17	9.963	9.201	7.995	7.491	5.068

0.419354838709677	9.548	9.357	8.753	7.84	7.357	5.064

0.451612903225806	9.546	9.328	8.625	7.756	7.232	4.748

0.483870967741936	8.785	8.59	8.16	7.273	7.167	4.525

0.516129032258065	8.783	8.568	7.804	7.271	6.548	4.457

0.548387096774194	8.146	7.98	7.641	6.749	6.512	4.277

0.580645161290323	8.08	7.893	7.292	6.645	6.283	4.269

0.612903225806452	7.881	7.701	7.179	6.611	6.106	4.052

0.645161290322581	7.597	7.442	7.103	6.142	5.72	3.966

0.67741935483871	7.191	7.024	6.434	5.783	5.391	3.864

0.709677419354839	6.829	6.667	6.212	5.599	5.236	3.828

0.741935483870968	6.552	6.404	6	5.506	5.126	3.779

0.774193548387097	6.543	6.395	5.912	5.494	5.048	3.653

0.806451612903226	6.31	6.175	5.7	4.934	4.703	3.528

0.838709677419355	5.994	5.858	5.414	4.774	4.702	3.524

0.870967741935484	5.904	5.759	5.319	4.755	4.538	3.339

0.903225806451613	5.721	5.586	5.051	4.751	4.496	2.964

0.935483870967742	5.195	5.11	4.779	4.448	4.384	2.793

0.967741935483871	5.103	4.992	4.688	4.395	3.932	2.341

0.1	12.739	12.447	11.393	10.529	9.8047	6.1448

					Average of yearly averages:	4.55323333333333

Inputs generated by pe4.pl - 8-August-2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: MEPot

Metfile:	w14607.dvf

PRZM scenario:	MEpotatoC.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	Indoxacarb

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	527	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	6E-10	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	1E-9	torr

Solubility	sol	8	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	400	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp		days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	71.13	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	577	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	264	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7		days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	0.16	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.95	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.16	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	15-6	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	5	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Interval 2	interval	5	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Interval 3	interval	5	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17:	FILTRA

	IPSCND	1

	UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

	PLDKRT

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	IR

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

CA SWISS CHARD (AERIAL)

stored as CACHARD.out

Chemical: Indoxacarb

PRZM environment: CAlettuceC.txt	modified Monday, 11 October 2004 at 14:23:40

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 14:34:12

Metfile: w23273.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 08:04:22

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	8.596	8.431	7.852	4.974	3.474	1.238

1962	7.118	7.035	6.666	6.417	6.127	3.921

1963	5.037	4.959	4.636	4.121	3.811	2.893

1964	8.249	8.118	7.564	6.698	5.093	2.723

1965	8.485	8.363	7.775	5.623	4.271	3.439

1966	6.647	6.532	6.103	5.366	4.905	3.633

1967	5.655	5.567	5.247	4.95	4.613	3.214

1968	6.095	5.969	5.589	5.041	4.362	2.599

1969	4.106	4.059	3.906	3.614	3.38	2.563

1970	7.468	7.338	6.777	4.612	3.495	2.586

1971	7.689	7.558	7.027	6.037	5.478	4.044

1972	7.195	7.058	6.574	5.371	4.203	2.578

1973	5.043	4.956	4.8	4.37	4.018	3.054

1974	12.84	12.67	11.73	7.407	5.583	3.634

1975	11.31	11.11	10.35	9.523	8.825	5.268

1976	10.13	9.976	9.237	7.829	7.26	4.388

1977	8.3	8.135	5.153	4.613	4.272	3.017

1978	10.65	10.42	9.563	8.066	7.456	5.501

1979	5.507	5.458	5.29	4.978	4.641	3.24

1980	5.645	5.571	5.272	4.66	4.293	2.984

1981	5.909	5.834	5.606	5.109	4.714	3.32

1982	3.719	3.659	3.515	3.284	2.644	2.265

1983	3.6	3.54	3.439	3.356	3.202	2.369

1984	4.319	4.248	3.801	2.811	2.419	2.089

1985	5.492	5.397	5.089	3.941	3.046	2.498

1986	4.424	4.356	4.134	3.554	3.302	2.824

1987	4.502	4.418	4.153	3.986	3.404	2.891

1988	5.263	5.173	4.033	3.585	3.288	2.412

1989	4.917	4.837	4.53	3.975	3.623	2.42

1990	2.903	2.851	2.709	2.344	2.116	1.522

Sorted results

Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	12.84	12.67	11.73	9.523	8.825	5.501

0.0645161290322581	11.31	11.11	10.35	8.066	7.456	5.268

0.0967741935483871	10.65	10.42	9.563	7.829	7.26	4.388

0.129032258064516	10.13	9.976	9.237	7.407	6.127	4.044

0.161290322580645	8.596	8.431	7.852	6.698	5.583	3.921

0.193548387096774	8.485	8.363	7.775	6.417	5.478	3.634

0.225806451612903	8.3	8.135	7.564	6.037	5.093	3.633

0.258064516129032	8.249	8.118	7.027	5.623	4.905	3.439

0.290322580645161	7.689	7.558	6.777	5.371	4.714	3.32

0.32258064516129	7.468	7.338	6.666	5.366	4.641	3.24

0.354838709677419	7.195	7.058	6.574	5.109	4.613	3.214

0.387096774193548	7.118	7.035	6.103	5.041	4.362	3.054

0.419354838709677	6.647	6.532	5.606	4.978	4.293	3.017

0.451612903225806	6.095	5.969	5.589	4.974	4.272	2.984

0.483870967741936	5.909	5.834	5.29	4.95	4.271	2.893

0.516129032258065	5.655	5.571	5.272	4.66	4.203	2.891

0.548387096774194	5.645	5.567	5.247	4.613	4.018	2.824

0.580645161290323	5.507	5.458	5.153	4.612	3.811	2.723

0.612903225806452	5.492	5.397	5.089	4.37	3.623	2.599

0.645161290322581	5.263	5.173	4.8	4.121	3.495	2.586

0.67741935483871	5.043	4.959	4.636	3.986	3.474	2.578

0.709677419354839	5.037	4.956	4.53	3.975	3.404	2.563

0.741935483870968	4.917	4.837	4.153	3.941	3.38	2.498

0.774193548387097	4.502	4.418	4.134	3.614	3.302	2.42

0.806451612903226	4.424	4.356	4.033	3.585	3.288	2.412

0.838709677419355	4.319	4.248	3.906	3.554	3.202	2.369

0.870967741935484	4.106	4.059	3.801	3.356	3.046	2.265

0.903225806451613	3.719	3.659	3.515	3.284	2.644	2.089

0.935483870967742	3.6	3.54	3.439	2.811	2.419	1.522

0.967741935483871	2.903	2.851	2.709	2.344	2.116	1.238

0.1	10.598	10.3756	9.5304	7.7868	7.1467	4.3536

					Average of yearly averages:	3.03756666666667

Inputs generated by pe4.pl - 8-August-2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: CACHARD

Metfile:	w23273.dvf

PRZM scenario:	CAlettuceC.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	Indoxacarb

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	527	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	6E-10	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	1E-9	torr

Solubility	sol	8	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	400	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp		days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	71.13	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	577	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	264	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7		days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	0.16	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.95	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.16	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	15-5	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	5	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17:	FILTRA

	IPSCND	1

	UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

	PLDKRT

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	IR

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

CA SWISS CHARD (GROUND)

stored as CACHGRD.out

Chemical: Indoxacarb

PRZM environment: CAlettuceC.txt	modified Monday, 11 October 2004 at 14:23:40

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 14:34:12

Metfile: w23273.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 08:04:22

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	8.72	8.551	7.955	4.944	3.359	0.9806

1962	7.241	7.156	6.776	6.502	6.211	3.665

1963	5.032	4.953	4.623	4.104	3.786	2.579

1964	8.252	8.117	7.552	6.659	4.966	2.387

1965	8.524	8.4	7.8	5.553	4.117	3.134

1966	6.633	6.516	6.092	5.356	4.89	3.342

1967	5.657	5.567	5.24	4.929	4.591	2.904

1968	5.973	5.847	5.467	4.931	4.229	2.275

1969	4.049	4.002	3.849	3.546	3.316	2.233

1970	7.502	7.368	6.781	4.498	3.306	2.254

1971	6.806	6.69	6.237	5.403	4.902	3.76

1972	7.17	7.031	6.537	5.292	4.048	2.239

1973	4.952	4.878	4.748	4.319	3.966	2.74

1974	13.07	12.9	11.94	7.411	5.482	3.34

1975	11.52	11.32	10.53	9.69	8.976	5.039

1976	10.13	9.975	9.227	7.803	7.199	4.134

1977	8.396	8.226	5.128	4.585	4.243	2.71

1978	10.59	10.37	9.501	7.995	7.391	5.301

1979	5.494	5.445	5.264	4.958	4.621	2.939

1980	5.641	5.565	5.261	4.641	4.263	2.675

1981	5.941	5.864	5.625	5.123	4.719	3.032

1982	3.583	3.523	3.369	3.131	2.439	1.927

1983	3.489	3.428	3.332	3.241	3.056	2.055

1984	4.259	4.187	3.722	2.669	2.334	1.775

1985	5.45	5.353	5.037	3.832	2.876	2.192

1986	4.322	4.254	4.032	3.493	3.244	2.516

1987	4.353	4.269	4.002	3.858	3.331	2.576

1988	5.219	5.127	3.956	3.508	3.212	2.081

1989	4.866	4.785	4.473	3.912	3.558	2.085

1990	1.997	1.967	1.868	1.761	1.634	1.156

Sorted results

Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	13.07	12.9	11.94	9.69	8.976	5.301

0.0645161290322581	11.52	11.32	10.53	7.995	7.391	5.039

0.0967741935483871	10.59	10.37	9.501	7.803	7.199	4.134

0.129032258064516	10.13	9.975	9.227	7.411	6.211	3.76

0.161290322580645	8.72	8.551	7.955	6.659	5.482	3.665

0.193548387096774	8.524	8.4	7.8	6.502	4.966	3.342

0.225806451612903	8.396	8.226	7.552	5.553	4.902	3.34

0.258064516129032	8.252	8.117	6.781	5.403	4.89	3.134

0.290322580645161	7.502	7.368	6.776	5.356	4.719	3.032

0.32258064516129	7.241	7.156	6.537	5.292	4.621	2.939

0.354838709677419	7.17	7.031	6.237	5.123	4.591	2.904

0.387096774193548	6.806	6.69	6.092	4.958	4.263	2.74

0.419354838709677	6.633	6.516	5.625	4.944	4.243	2.71

0.451612903225806	5.973	5.864	5.467	4.931	4.229	2.675

0.483870967741936	5.941	5.847	5.264	4.929	4.117	2.579

0.516129032258065	5.657	5.567	5.261	4.641	4.048	2.576

0.548387096774194	5.641	5.565	5.24	4.585	3.966	2.516

0.580645161290323	5.494	5.445	5.128	4.498	3.786	2.387

0.612903225806452	5.45	5.353	5.037	4.319	3.558	2.275

0.645161290322581	5.219	5.127	4.748	4.104	3.359	2.254

0.67741935483871	5.032	4.953	4.623	3.912	3.331	2.239

0.709677419354839	4.952	4.878	4.473	3.858	3.316	2.233

0.741935483870968	4.866	4.785	4.032	3.832	3.306	2.192

0.774193548387097	4.353	4.269	4.002	3.546	3.244	2.085

0.806451612903226	4.322	4.254	3.956	3.508	3.212	2.081

0.838709677419355	4.259	4.187	3.849	3.493	3.056	2.055

0.870967741935484	4.049	4.002	3.722	3.241	2.876	1.927

0.903225806451613	3.583	3.523	3.369	3.131	2.439	1.775

0.935483870967742	3.489	3.428	3.332	2.669	2.334	1.156

0.967741935483871	1.997	1.967	1.868	1.761	1.634	0.9806

0.1	10.544	10.3305	9.4736	7.7638	7.1002	4.0966

					Average of yearly averages:	2.73418666666667

Inputs generated by pe4.pl - 8-August-2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: CACHGRD

Metfile:	w23273.dvf

PRZM scenario:	CAlettuceC.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	Indoxacarb

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	527	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	6E-10	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	1E-9	torr

Solubility	sol	8	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	400	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp		days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	71.13	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	577	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	264	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7		days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	0.16	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.99	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.064	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	15-5	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	5	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17:	FILTRA

	IPSCND	1

	UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

	PLDKRT

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	IR

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

APPENDIX B-SCIGROW  ESTIMATES

COTTON, APPLES, POTATOES

                           SCIGROW

                          VERSION 2.3

            ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND EFFECTS DIVISION

                 OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS

             U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                        SCREENING MODEL

                FOR AQUATIC PESTICIDE EXPOSURE

 SciGrow version 2.3

 chemical:Indoxacarb

 time is  1/31/2007   9:44:25

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -

  Application      Number of       Total Use    Koc      Soil Aerobic

  rate (lb/acre)  applications   (lb/acre/yr)  (ml/g)   metabolism (days)

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -

      0.143           4.0           0.571      4.00E+02      136.0

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -

 groundwater screening cond (ppb) =   2.06E-01

 *********************************************************************** *

CABBAGE

                           SCIGROW

                          VERSION 2.3

            ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND EFFECTS DIVISION

                 OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS

             U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                        SCREENING MODEL

                FOR AQUATIC PESTICIDE EXPOSURE

 SciGrow version 2.3

 chemical:Indoxacarb

 time is  1/31/2007   9:47:50

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -

  Application      Number of       Total Use    Koc      Soil Aerobic

  rate (lb/acre)  applications   (lb/acre/yr)  (ml/g)   metabolism (days)

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -

      0.086           4.0           0.343      4.00E+02      136.0

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -

 groundwater screening cond (ppb) =   1.24E-01

 *********************************************************************** *

 TURF (FL)

                           SCIGROW

                          VERSION 2.3

            ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND EFFECTS DIVISION

                 OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS

             U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                        SCREENING MODEL

                FOR AQUATIC PESTICIDE EXPOSURE

 SciGrow version 2.3

 chemical:Indoxacarb

 time is  1/31/2007   9:46:39

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -

  Application      Number of       Total Use    Koc      Soil Aerobic

  rate (lb/acre)  applications   (lb/acre/yr)  (ml/g)   metabolism (days)

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -

      0.004           2.0           0.007      4.00E+02      136.0

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -

 groundwater screening cond (ppb) =   2.58E-03

 *********************************************************************** *

SWISS CHARD (CA)

                           SCIGROW

                          VERSION 2.3

            ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND EFFECTS DIVISION

                 OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS

             U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                        SCREENING MODEL

                FOR AQUATIC PESTICIDE EXPOSURE

 SciGrow version 2.3

 chemical:Indoxacarb

 time is  1/31/2007   9:48:31

*

ÿ

*

2

h

È

É

N

O

Ç

È

N欀顤

愀Ĥ摧筵u

愀Ĥ摧筵u

愀Ĥ摧筵u

愀Ĥ摧筵u

愀Ĥ摧筵u

ሀ

------------------------------------

      0.143           2.0           0.286      4.00E+02      136.0

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -

 groundwater screening cond (ppb) =   1.03E-01

 *********************************************************************** *

 ai-Active ingredient is defined as the S isomer of indoxacarb (KN128).  The R isomer (KN127) is an inactive isomer.

 PAGE

 PAGE   5


                             SUPPORTING STATEMENT
                                      for
NESHAP for Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations (40 CFR part 63, subpart JJ)

PART A
1.0  	Identification of the Information Collection
(a) 	Title and Number of the Information Collection.
	NESHAP for Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations (40 CFR part 63, subpart JJ) (Proposed Rule), OMB Control Number 2060-0324, EPA ICR Number 1716.07.
 (b) 	Short Characterization.
	This ICR covers information collection requirements in the proposed amendments to the Wood Furniture NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart JJ).
	The potential respondents are owners or operators of any existing or new affected source with wood furniture manufacturing operations.  There are an estimated 406 facilities subject to the Wood Furniture Manufacturing NESHAP.  The affected source is any wood furniture manufacturing facility that is engaged, either in part or in whole, in the manufacture of wood furniture or wood furniture components and that is located at a plant site that is a major source as defined in 40 CFR part 63.2, excluding sources that meet the criteria established in §63.800(a). (b), and (c) of the Wood Furniture Manufacturing NESHAP.
      The proposed amendments would prohibit the use of conventional spray guns used in wood furniture coating operations; add a new formaldehyde emission limit of 400 pound per 12-month rolling average; and revise the reporting requirements. These amendments are explained further in the following paragraphs.
      The prohibition for conventional spray guns has a compliance date 3 years from the promulgation date which will allow any facility that is still using such equipment to replace it with more efficient spray equipment during those 3 years.  Any cost associated with the new equipment will be offset by the increased transfer efficiency and reduced coating cost.  The proposed formaldehyde limit of 400 pounds will require any facility with formaldehyde in their wood furniture coatings to calculate their coating usage and associated formaldehyde contents each month.  The 12-month rolling average must be documented monthly and reported annually.
      The additional reporting requirements pertain only to the calculation and documentation of formaldehyde usage.
      The information collection requirements associated with the proposed amendments to the NESHAP are listed in Attachment 1.
2.  	Need For and Use of the Collection
(a)	Need/Authority for the Collection.
	Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires EPA to establish NESHAP for both major and area sources of HAP that are listed for regulation under CAA section 112(c).  A major source is a stationary source that emits or has the potential to emit more than 10 tons per year (tpy) of any single HAP or more than 25 tpy of any combination of HAP.  An area source is a stationary source that is not a major source (i.e., an area source does not emit and does not have the potential to emit more than 10 tpy of any single HAP and more than 25 tpy of any combination of HAP).  For major sources, these technology-based standards must reflect the maximum degree of emission reductions of HAP achievable (after considering cost, energy requirements, and non-air quality health and environmental impacts) and are commonly referred to as maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards.  Section 112(d)(6) requires EPA to review these technology-based standards and to revise them "as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes, and control technologies)" no less frequently than every 8 years.  In addition, section 112(f) of the CAA requires EPA to determine for source categories subject to certain CAA section 112(d) standards whether the emissions limitations provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health.  For MACT standards for HAP "classified as a known, probable, or possible human carcinogen" that "do not reduce lifetime excess cancer risks to the individual most exposed to emissions from a source in the category or subcategory to less than 1-in-1 million," EPA must promulgate residual risk standards for the source category (or subcategory) as necessary to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health.  In doing so, EPA may adopt standards equal to existing MACT standards, if EPA determines that the existing standards are sufficiently protective.  EPA must also adopt more stringent standards, if necessary, to prevent an adverse environmental effect, but must consider cost, energy, safety, and other relevant factors in doing so.
	Certain records and reports are necessary for the Administrator to confirm the compliance status of sources subject to NESHAP, identify any new or reconstructed sources subject to the standards, and confirm that the standards are being achieved on a continuous basis.  These recordkeeping and reporting requirements are specifically authorized by section 114 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7414) and set out in the part 63 NESHAP General Provisions.  The recordkeeping and reporting requirements for title V permits are contained in 40 CFR 70.6 and 40 CFR 71.6.  Under parts 63 and 70 or 71, the owner or operator must keep each record for 5 years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record.
 (b)	Use/Users of the Data.
	The information will be used by the delegated authority (State agency, or Regional Administrator if there is no delegated State agency) to ensure that the standards and other requirements are being achieved.  Based on review of the recorded information at the site and the reported information, the delegated permitting authority can identify facilities that may not be in compliance and decide which facilities, records, or processes may need inspection.
3.	Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria
(a)	Nonduplication.
      A computer search of EPA's ongoing ICRs revealed no duplication of information-gathering efforts.
 (b)  	Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB.
	Public notice is provided in the preamble to the proposed rule.  The final rule ICR will address any public comments received.
(c)	Consultations.
      The proposed amendments were developed in consultation with individual companies, State agencies, and trade associations.  The non-EPA persons consulted on the information collection activities are identified in Table 1.
TABLE 1.  PERSONS CONSULTED ON THE INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITIES
                                    Contact
                                 Organization
                                 Telephone No.
Dick Titus
Kitchen Cabinets Manufacturers Association
703-264-1690
Bill Perdue
American Home Furnishings Alliance
336-884-5000
Brad Miller
Business and Institutional Furniture Manufacturers Assn
616-285-3963
David Darling
American Coatings Association
202-462-6272

(d)	Effects of Less Frequent Collection.
	If the relevant information was collected less frequently, the delegated permitting authority (State or EPA) will not be reasonably assured that a facility is in compliance with the standards.
(e)	General Guidelines.
	None of the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.6 are being exceeded.
(f)	Confidentiality.
	All information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 2, Subpart B--Confidentiality of Business Information (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 39999, September 28, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 28, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).
(g)  	Sensitive Questions.
	This section is not applicable because this ICR does not involve matters of a sensitive nature.
4.	The Respondents and the Information Requested
(a)	Respondents/NAICS Codes.
      Potential respondents under subpart JJ are owners or operators of any existing or new facility engaged in wood furniture manufacturing operations.  Wood furniture manufacturing facilities are primarily classified under NAICS codes 337110, Wood Kitchen Cabinet and Countertop Manufacturing; 33712, Household and Institutional Furniture Manufacturing; 337211, Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing; and 337212, Custom Architectural Woodwork and Millwork Manufacturing.  However, wood furniture manufacturing operations are also co-located at many facilities that are classified under other NAICS codes.  Examples include NAICS 337910, Other Furniture Related Products Manufacturing, and 321999, All Other Furniture Related Products Manufacturing.
      There are an estimated 150 facilities that would be subject to the proposed amendments to the NESHAP involving the formaldehyde emission limit.  No new wood furniture manufacturing sources are expected during the 3year period of this ICR.
 (b) Information Requested.
	(i)  Data Items, Including Recordkeeping Requirements.  Attachment 1, Information Requirements, summarizes the data items, including recordkeeping and reporting requirements, for the Wood Furniture Manufacturing source category.
	(ii)  Respondent Activities.  The respondent activities that will be required by the proposed amendments to the Wood Furniture NESHAP are identified in Table 2 and are introduced in section 6(a).
5.	The Information Collected - Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management
(a)	Agency Activities.
	The Agency activities associated with the proposed amendments to the Wood Furniture NESHAP are provided in Table 3 and are introduced in section 6(c).
(b)	Collection Methodology and Management.
	Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs of the delegated permitting authority.  EPA is the permitting authority until the State agency is delegated authority to implement the final amendments to the rule.  Therefore, information contained in any report submitted to the Regional Administrator will be entered into the Air Facility System (AFS), which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance.  AFS is EPA's database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and government-owned facilities.  EPA uses the AFS for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement by local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters.  EPA and its delegated authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data.
(c)  	Small Entity Flexibility.
	The Small Business Administration defines a small entity engaging in wood furniture manufacturing operations as a firm having no more than 500 to 1,000 employees (depending on the size definition for the affected NAICS code).   The proposed amendments would not result in any significant adverse impacts on any small entities in the Wood Furniture Manufacturing source category.  The proposed amendments would not create any new requirements or burdens for existing sources other than minimal notification requirements, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements.
(d)  	Collection Schedule.
	The specific frequency for each information collection activity within this request is shown in Table 2 for the Wood Furniture Source Category.
6.   	Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection
(a)  	Estimating Respondent Burden.
	The annual burden estimates for the proposed amendments to the Wood Furniture NESHAP are shown in Table 2.  These numbers were derived from estimates based on EPA's experience with other standards.  No burden estimates are provided for new sources because no new facilities are expected to become affected sources during the 3year period of this ICR.
(b)  	Estimating Respondent Costs.
	The information collection activities for the proposed amendments to the Wood Furniture NESHAP are presented in Table 2.  Because the data are already collected by respondents as part of normal operations, no respondent development costs are associated with the information collection activities.
      (i)  Estimating Labor Costs.  Labor rates and associated costs are based on Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data.  Technical, management, and clerical average hourly rates for private industry workers were taken from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wages, March 2009 available at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/ecec_06102009.htm.   Wages for technical labor are based on "Civilian workers  -  professional and related," with a total compensation of $46.47/hour.  Wages for management labor are taken from "Civilian workers  -  management, business, and financial," with a total compensation of $54.65/hour.   Wages for clerical labor are based on "Civilian workers  -  office and administrative support," with a total compensation of $22.98/hour.  These rates represent salaries plus fringe benefits and do not include the cost of overhead.  An overhead rate of 110 percent is used to account for these costs.  The fully-burdened hourly wage rates used to represent respondent labor costs are:  technical at $97.59 /hour, management at $114.77 /hour, and clerical at $48.26 /hour.
	(ii)  Estimating Capital and Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Costs.  No capital costs or O & M costs are associated with the information collection requirements of the proposed amendments to the Wood Furniture NESHAP.  The proposed amendments would not require affected facilities to purchase new monitoring systems or conduct new performance testing.
	(iii)  Annualizing Capital Costs.  No capital costs associated with the information collection requirements of the proposed amendments to the Wood Furniture NESHAP.
(c)  	Estimating Agency Burden and Cost.
	Because the information collection requirements were developed as an incidental part of standards development, no costs can be attributed to the development of the information collection requirements.  Because reporting and recordkeeping requirements on the part of the respondents are required under the operating permits rules in 40 CFR part 70 or part 71 and the part 63 NESHAP General Provisions, no operational costs will be incurred by the Federal Government.  Publication and distribution of the information are part of the Compliance Data System, with the result that no Federal costs can be directly attributed to the ICR.  Examination of records to be maintained by the respondents will occur incidentally as part of the periodic inspection of sources that is part of EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program, and, therefore, is not attributable to the ICR.  The only costs that the Federal government will incur are user costs associated with the analysis of the reported information, as presented in Table 3.
	The Agency labor rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 2010 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay.  These rates can be obtained from Salary Table 2010-GS available on the OPM website, http://www.opm.gov/oca/10tables/pdf/gs_h.pdf. The government employee labor rates are $15.63/hour for clerical (GS-6, Step 3), $28.88 for technical (GS-12, Step 1), and $38.92/hr for management (GS-13, Step 5).  These rates were increased by 60 percent to include fringe benefits and overhead.  The fully-burdened wage rates used to represent Agency labor costs are:  clerical at $25.01/hour; technical at $46.21/hour, and management at $62.27/hour.
 (d) 	Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs.
      There are an estimated 406 existing facilities that are subject to the Wood Furniture NESHAP.  No new sources are expected during the next 3 years.  Consequently, the average number of wood furniture respondents during the 3-year period of this ICR is 135.
      For the proposed amendments to the Wood Furniture NESHAP, the components of the total annual burden attributable to this ICR include reading the amendments to the NESHAP; collecting coating usage information and calculating formaldehyde emissions on a 12-month rolling average; and reporting those formaldehyde emissions on an annual basis; all other recordkeeping and reporting activities are already accounted for in the ICR for the NESHAP.
(e)	Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables.
      (i)  Respondent tally.  The bottom line respondent burden hours and costs, presented in Table 2 are calculated by adding person-hours per year down each column for technical, managerial, and clerical staff, and by adding down the cost column.  The average annual burden for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the proposed amendments to subpart JJ for the 406 existing facilities that are subject to the Wood Furniture NESHAP is 2,001 person-hours, with an annual average cost of $188,188.  No capital costs would be expected for the proposed amendments.
	(ii)  The Agency tally.  The average annual Federal Government cost is $5,182 for 115 hours for the proposed amendments to subpart JJ.  The bottom line Agency burden hours and costs presented in Table 3 are calculated by adding person-hours per year down each column for technical, managerial, and clerical staff, and by adding down the cost column.
	(iii)  Variations in the annual bottom line.  This section does not apply since no significant variation is anticipated.
(f)	Reasons for Change in Burden.
	This ICR covers information collection requirements in the proposed amendments to the Wood Furniture NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart JJ).
 (g)  	Burden Statement
	The average annual respondent burden for the proposed amendments to the Wood Furniture NESHAP is estimated at 5 hours per facility.
      Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency.  This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
	An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations in 40 CFR part 63 are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
	To comment on the Agency's need for this information the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggestions for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0786, which is available for online viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC.  The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.  The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.  An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov.  This site can be used to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically.  When in the system, select "search," then key in the Docket ID Number identified above.  Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17[th] Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention Desk Officer for EPA.  Please include the Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0786 and OMB Control Number 2060-0324 in any correspondence.
PART B
	This section is not applicable because statistical methods are not used in data collection associated with the proposed rule.
TABLE 2.  ANNUAL RESPONDENT BURDEN AND COST--AMENDMENTS TO WOOD FURNITURE MANUFACTURING NESHAP
                                  Burden item
                                     (A)
                          Person-hours per occurrence
                                     (B)
                       No. of occurrences per respondent
                                     (C)
                      Person-hours per respondent (C=A*B)
                           (D) Respondents per year
                                     (E)
                    Technical person-hours per year (E=C*D)
                                     (F)
                       Management person-hours per year
                                    (E*0.05)
                                     (G)
                    Clerical person-hours per year (E*0.1)
                                     (H)
                                  Cost[a], $
1.  Applications
                                      N/A

2.  Surveys and Studies
                                      N/A

3.  Acquisition, Installation, and Utilization of Technology and Systems
                                      N/A

4.  Reporting Requirements

A.  Read instructions[b]
                                       4
                                       1
                                       4
                                      135
                                      540
                                      27
                                      54
                                    $58,403
B.  Required activities
                                      N/A

C.  Create information[c]
                                       2
                                      12
                                      24
                                      50
                                     1,200
                                      60
                                      120
                                   $129,785
D.  Gather existing information
                                      N/A

E.  Write report

5.  Recordkeeping Requirements

A.  Read instructions
                                    See 4A

B.  Plan activities
                                      N/A

C.  Implement activities
                                      N/A

D.  Develop record system
                                      N/A

E.  Time to enter information
                                    See 4C

F.  Time to train personnel
                                      N/A

G.  Time to adjust existing ways to comply with previously applicable requirements
                                      N/A

H.  Time to transmit or disclose information
                                      N/A

I.  Time for audits
                                      N/A

TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (SALARY)

                                     1,740
                                      87
                                      174
                                   $188,188
TOTAL NUMBER OF ANNUAL RESPONSES
                                      406
ANNUAL CAPITAL COSTS[d]

TOTAL ANNUALIZED COSTS

                                   $188,188
N/A = not applicable.
[a]  This ICR uses the following labor rates:  $114.77 for managerial labor, $97.59 for technical labor, and $48.26 for clerical labor.  These rates are based on the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wages, March 2009.
[b]  There are an estimated 406 existing facilities; no new facilities are expected; the average number expected to read the rule during the 3-yr compliance period is 406/3 = 135.
[c]  There are an estimated 150 existing facilities using coatings containing formaldehyde; the average number expected to comply with the proposed formaldehyde limit during the 3-yr compliance period is 150/3 = 50.
[d]  There would be no capital costs associated with the reporting and recordkeeping requirements of the proposed amendments.
 3.  ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST TO THE AGENCY----AMENDMENTS TO WOOD FURNITURE MANUFACTURING NESHAP
                                  Burden item
                                     (A)
                          Person-hours per occurrence
                        (B) Occurrences per respondent
                                     (C)
                         EPA person-hours/year (C=A*B)
                                     (D)
                              Facilities per year
                                     (E)
                      Technical person-hours/year (E=C*D)
                                     (F)
                   Management   person-hours/year (F=0.05*E)
                                     (G)
                     Clerical person-hours/year (G=0.1*E)
                                      (H)
                                  Cost[a], $
Report Review:

   Plant records of  annual formaldehyde emissions based on 12-month rolling avg[b]
                                       2
                                       1
                                       2
                                      50
                                      100
                                       5
                                      10
                                    $5,182
TOTAL BURDEN AND COST

                                    $5,182
[a]   This ICR uses the following average hourly labor rates: $62.27 for managerial (GS-13, Step 5), $46.21 (GS-12, Step 1) for technical, and $25.01 (GS-6, Step 3) for clerical.  These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 2010 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay.
[b] Assumes Agency will review all of the annual reports  - including the formaldehyde emissions calculated on a 12-month rolling average.ATTACHMENT 1.  INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS----AMENDMENTS TO WOOD FURNITURE MANUFACTURING NESHAP
                                  Requirement
                         Citation for existing sources
                           Citation for new sources
                          General Provisions citation
Formaldehyde limit
§ 63.802(a)(4)
§ 63.802(b)(4)

Prohibit Conventional Spray Guns
§ 63.803(h)
§ 63.803(h)

Monitoring
§ 63.804(h)
§ 63.804(h)
N/A
Notifications
N/A
N/A
N/A
Plans

    Operation and Maintenance Plan
N/A
N/A
N/A
Records

    Monitoring/inspection information
§ 63.806(b)(4)
§ 63.806(b)(4)
N/A
Reports
§ 63.807(c)(3)
§ 63.807(c)(3)
40 CFR 63.10(e)


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 100 (Thursday, May 23, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30768-30770]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12208]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0728; FRL-9799-2]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South
Coast Air Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to the South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This action was proposed in the Federal
Register on February 4, 2013 and concerns volatile organic compound
(VOC) emissions from municipal solid waste landfills and dairies. We
are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under
the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).

DATES: These rules will be effective on June 24, 2013.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0728 for
this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, California 94105-3901. While all documents in
the docket are listed at http://www.regulations.gov, some information
may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g.,
copyrighted material, large maps, multi-volume reports), and some may
not be available in either location (e.g., confidential business
information (CBI)). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule
an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, (415) 942-
3848<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action

    On February 13, 2013 (78 FR 7703), EPA proposed to approve the
following rules into the California SIP.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Local agency                Rule No.               Rule title               Adopted        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCAQMD..........................           1150.1  Control of Gaseous Emissions         04/01/11        09/27/11
                                                    from Municipal Solid Waste
                                                    Landfills.
SCAQMD..........................           1127    Emissions Reductions from            08/06/04        10/05/06
                                                    Livestock Waste.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they
complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rules and our evaluation.

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no adverse comments on this proposal.

III. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rule
as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in
section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving these rules into
the California SIP.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 22, 2013. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: March 27, 2013.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(347)(i)(B)(2) and
(c)(404)(i)(A)(4)to read as follows:

Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (347) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) * * *
    (2) Rule 1127, ``Emissions Reductions from Livestock Waste,''
adopted on August 6, 2004.
* * * * *
    (404) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (4) Rule 1150.1, ``Control of Gaseous Emissions from Municipal
Solid Waste Landfills,'' amended on April 1, 2011.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-12208 Filed 5-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P