[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11361-11362]
[FR Doc No: 2020-04023]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP20-50-000; Docket No. CP20-51-000]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.; Southern Natural Gas
Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Application

    Take notice that on February 7, 2020, Tennessee Gas Pipeline
Company, L.L.C. (Tennessee), 1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 1000,
Houston, Texas 77002, filed in the above referenced docket an
application pursuant to section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, requesting
authorization to construct, install, modify, operate, and maintain the
Evangeline Pass Expansion Project located in Louisiana. Specifically,
Tennessee proposes to: (i) Construct, operate and maintain
approximately 9.1 miles of 36-inch-loop pipeline, along Tennessee's
existing 24-inch Toca 529D-100 Yscloskey Lateral located in St. Bernard
Parish, Louisiana; (ii) construct, operate and maintain approximately
4.0 miles of 36-inch-loop pipeline, along Tennessee's existing 36-inch
500-2 Pipeline in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana; and (iii) construct,
operate and maintain a new 23,470 horsepower compressor station, CS
529, along Tennessee's existing 500 line system at mainline valve 529
in St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana. In addition, and in conjunction with
the Project,

Tennessee will replace certain facilities including a like-for-like
replacement of two 10,410 hp units at its existing Compressor Station
527 located in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana. Tennessee also seeks to
acquire lease capacity from Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
pursuant to a lease agreement between the parties. Tennessee estimates
the cost of the project to be $261 million, all as more fully described
in the application which is on file with the Commission and open to
public inspection.
    Take notice that on February 7, 2020, Southern Natural Gas Company,
L.L.C. (SNG), 569 Brookwood Village, Suite 749, Birmingham, Alabama
35209, filed in the above referenced docket an application pursuant to
section 7(b) and 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, requesting authorization
to construct, install, own, lease, operate, and maintain the SNG
Evangeline Pass Expansion Project located in Mississippi and Louisiana.
Specifically, SNG proposes to: (i) Install 22,220 hp of compression at
a new compressor station in Clark County Mississippi; (ii) construct
three new meter stations in Clark and Smith Counties, Mississippi and
in St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana; and (iii) construct and/or modify
certain system auxiliary and appurtenant facilities under Section
2.55(a) at existing compressor stations and along the pipeline corridor
in Mississippi and Louisiana. SNG estimates the cost of the project to
be $171 million. The SNG Evangeline Pass
    Expansion Project will add 1,100 mmcf/d of southbound capacity to
the existing SNG system, which SNG will lease to Tennessee Gas Pipeline
Company, L.L.C., all as more fully described in the application which
is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    These filings are available for review at the Commission in the
Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's website web
at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY,
(202) 502-8659.
    Any questions regarding this application should be directed to Ben
Carranza, Director, Regulatory, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.,
1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77002, by telephone
at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
Debbie Kalisek, Senior Regulatory Analyst II, Tennessee Gas Pipeline
Company, L.L.C., 1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 1000, Houston, Texas
77002, by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Any questions regarding this application should be directed to Tim
Hardy, Manager, Rate & Regulatory Affairs, Southern Natural Gas
Company, L.L.C., 569 Brookwood Village, Suite 749, Birmingham, Alabama
35209, by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 3 copies of filings made in the proceeding with the Commission
and must provide a copy to the applicant and to every other party. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list and will be
notified of any meetings associated with the Commission's environmental
review process. Environmental commenters will not be required to serve
copies of filed documents on all other parties. However, the non-party
commenters will not receive copies of all documents filed by other
parties or issued by the Commission and will not have the right to seek
court review of the Commission's final order.
    As of the February 27, 2018 date of the Commission's order in
Docket No. CP16-4-001, the Commission will apply its revised practice
concerning out-of-time motions to intervene in any new Natural Gas Act
section 3 or section 7 proceeding.\1\ Persons desiring to become a
party to a certificate proceeding are to intervene in a timely manner.
If seeking to intervene out-of-time, the movant is required to show
good cause why the time limitation should be waived, and should provide
justification by reference to factors set forth in Rule 214(d)(1) of
the Commission's Rules and Regulations.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C., 162 FERC 61,167 at
50 (2018).
    \2\ 18 CFR 385.214(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at
http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 3 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on March 13, 2020.

    Dated: February 21, 2020.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-04023 Filed 2-26-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 96 (Friday, May 17, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22551-22552]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09956]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Approval of Noise Compatibility Program for San Francisco
International Airport, San Mateo County, California

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces its
findings on the noise compatibility program submitted by the City and
County of San Francisco, Airport Commission (Airport Commission), San
Mateo County, California under the provisions of 49, United States Code
(U.S.C.) (the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act, hereinafter
referred to as ``the Act'') and 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
Part 150 (hereinafter referred to as ``Part 150''). These findings are
made in recognition of the description of Federal and nonfederal
responsibilities in Senate Report No. 96-52 (1990). On January 29,
2016, the FAA determined that the noise exposure map updates submitted
by the Airport Commission under Part 150 were in compliance with
applicable requirements. On April 1, 2019, the FAA approved the San
Francisco International Airport, Airport Noise Compatibility Program
(NCP) Update. The 3 (three) measures recommended in the NCP Update were
approved. No program elements relating to new or revised flight
procedures for noise abatement were proposed by the airport operator.

DATES: The effective date of the FAA's approval of the San Francisco
International Airport noise compatibility program is April 1, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Camille Garibaldi, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, San Francisco
Airports District Office, 1000 Marina Boulevard, Suite 220, Brisbane,
California 94005-7600. Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Documents reflecting
this FAA action may be reviewed at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces that the FAA has given
its overall approval to the noise compatibility program for San
Francisco International Airport, effective April 1, 2019.
    Under section 47504 of the Act, an airport operator who has
previously submitted a noise exposure map may submit to the FAA a noise
compatibility program which sets forth the measures taken or proposed
by the airport operator for the reduction of existing non-compatible
land uses and prevention of additional non-compatible land uses within
the area covered by the noise exposure maps. The Act requires such
programs to be developed in consultation with interested and affected
parties including local communities, government agencies, airport
users, and FAA personnel.
    Each airport noise compatibility program developed in accordance
with Part 150 is a local program, not a Federal program. The FAA does
not substitute its judgment for that of the airport proprietor with
respect to which measures should be recommended for

action. The FAA's approval or disapproval of Part 150 program
recommendations is measured according to the standards expressed in
Part 150 and the Act and is limited to the following determinations:
    a. The noise compatibility program was developed in accordance with
the provisions and procedures of Part 150;
    b. Program measures are reasonably consistent with achieving the
goals of reducing existing non-compatible land uses around the airport
and preventing the introduction of additional non-compatible land uses;
    c. Program measures would not create an undue burden on interstate
or foreign commerce, unjustly discriminate against types or classes of
aeronautical uses, violate the terms of airport grant agreements, or
intrude into areas preempted by the Federal Government; and
    d. Program measures relating to the use of flight procedures can be
implemented within the period covered by the program without derogating
safety, adversely affecting the efficient use and management of the
navigable airspace and air traffic control systems, or adversely
affecting other powers and responsibilities of the Administrator
prescribed by law.
    Specific limitations with respect to FAA's approval of an airport
noise compatibility program are delineated in Part 150, section 150.5.
Approval is not a determination concerning the acceptability of land
uses under Federal, state, or local law. Approval does not by itself
constitute an FAA implementing action. A request for Federal action or
approval to implement specific noise compatibility measures may be
required. Prior to an FAA decision on a request to implement the
action, an environmental review of the proposed action may be required.
Approval does not constitute a commitment by the FAA to financially
assist in the implementation of the program nor a determination that
all measures covered by the program are eligible for grant-in-aid
funding from the FAA. Where Federal funding is sought, requests for
project grants must be submitted to the FAA San Francisco Airports
District Office in the Western-Pacific Region.
    The Airport Commission submitted their noise compatibility program
to the FAA on July 17, 2018, including the noise exposure maps,
descriptions and other documentation produced during the noise
compatibility planning study conducted from March 3, 2014 through
October 18, 2018. The San Francisco International Airport noise
exposure maps were determined by FAA to be in compliance with
applicable requirements on January 29, 2016. Notice of this
determination was published in the Federal Register (81 FR 7186) on
February 10, 2016.
    The noise exposure maps are based on operational data that is now
over five years old. FAA received certification, in accordance with 14
CFR 150.21, that the noise exposure maps are representative of
conditions at the airport for the existing and forecast timeframe as of
the date of August 2015. Due to the aircraft operational and fleet mix
changes since 2015, at the airport, FAA recommends the Airport
Commission review, revise, and update, as appropriate the future noise
exposure maps under 14 CFR 150.21 at the earliest opportunity.
    The San Francisco International Airport study contains a proposed
noise compatibility program update comprised of actions designed for
phased implementation by the Airport Commission through the year 2019.
It was requested that the FAA evaluate and approve this material as a
noise compatibility program as described in section 47504 of the Act.
The FAA began its review of the program on October 26, 2018, and was
required by a provision of the Act to approve or disapprove the program
within 180 days (other than the use of new or modified flight
procedures for noise control). Failure to approve or disapprove such
program within the 180-day period shall be deemed to be an approval of
such program.
    The submitted program contained 3 (three) proposed measures for
noise abatement, noise mitigation, and program management. The FAA
completed its review and determined that the procedural and substantive
requirements of the Act and Part 150 have been satisfied. The overall
program was approved by the FAA, effective April 1, 2019.
    Outright approval was granted for the 3 (three) program measures.
The approved measures include: Noise Abatement Measure #1--Install
Permanent or Portable Aircraft Noise and Operations Monitoring
Equipment; Noise Mitigation Measure #1--Acoustical Treatment Program;
and Program Management Measure--Review and Revision of the Noise
Compatibility Program.
    These determinations are set forth in detail in a Record of
Approval signed by the Director, Office of Airports, Western-Pacific
Region on April 1, 2019. The Record of Approval, as well as other
evaluation materials and the documents comprising the submittal, are
available for review at the FAA office listed above and at the
administrative offices of the Airport Commission.
    The Record of Approval also will be available on-line at: http://www.faa.gov/airports/environmental/airport_noise/part_150/states/.

    Issued in El Segundo, California on May 6, 2019.
Arlene B. Draper,
Acting Director, Office of Airports, Western-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 2019-09956 Filed 5-16-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


 Page 1 of 12 March 23, 2006 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Inert Ingredient Dietary Risk Assessment for Linear Alkyl Benzenesulfonate Reregistration Eligibility Document ( RED) Registration RED 4006 26242 DP# 324036 FROM: Kerry Leifer Inert Ingredient Assessment Branch Registration Division ( 7505C)

TO: Jennifer Slotnick, Chemical Review Manager RM Team 36 Regulatory Management Branch II Antimicrobials Division ( 7510C)

and Deborah Smegal Reregistration Branch I Health Effects Division ( 7509C)

As part of the overall risk assessment for Reregistration Case No. 4006: benzenesulfonic acid, dodecyl ( CAS Reg. No. 27176 87 0); sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate ( CAS Reg. No. 25155 30 0); and benzenesulfonic acid, C10 16 alkyl derivs. ( CAS Reg. No. 68584 22 5), exposures resulting from the active ingredient use of these substances ( referred to throughout this document as " linear alkylbenzenesulfonates") are aggregated with exposures resulting from the use of the linear alkylbenzenesulfonates as inert ingredients. This memorandum includes an assessment of dietary exposures ( including both food and drinking water) for the inert ingredient uses of benzenesulfonic acid, dodecyl ( CAS Reg. No. 27176 87 0); sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate ( CAS Reg. No. 25155 30 0); and benzenesulfonic acid, C10 16 alkyl derives. ( CAS Reg. No. 68584 22 5) to be utilized for reregistration risk assessment purposes.

Background Benzenesulfonic acid, dodecyl ( CAS Reg. No. 27176 87 0); sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate ( CAS Reg. No. 25155 30 0); and benzenesulfonic acid, C10 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D. C. 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES, AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES Page 2 of 12 16 alkyl derives. ( CAS Reg. No. 68584 22 5) each have use as pesticide inert ingredients ( surfactants) in a number of food use and nonfood use pesticide products. In the case of the food uses of these substances, their food residues are considered exempt from the requirement of a tolerance based on these substances being part of a group of alkyl benzenesulfonates for which an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance exists under the 40 CFR § 180.910 and40 CFR § 180.930 listings of " Alkyl ( C8 C24) benzenesulfonic acid and its ammonium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, and zinc salts" summarized in Table 1 below.

Table 1. Tolerance Exemptions for Linear Alkylbenzensulfonates as Inert Ingredients Tolerance Exemption Expression/ Chemical Name CAS Reg. No. 40 CFR § 180. Use Pattern ( Pesticidal)

910 Surfactants, related adjuvants of surfactants Alkyl ( C8 C24) benzenesulfonic acid and its ammonium, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, and zinc salts.

930 Surfactants, emulsifier, related adjuvants of surfactants Inert Ingredient Dietary Risk Assessment for Linear Alkyl Benzenesulfonate A. Exposure Assumptions A dietary exposure analysis for the inert ingredient use of linear alkyl benzenesulfonate ( benzenesulfonic acid, dodecyl ( CAS Reg. No. 27176 87 0); sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate ( CAS Reg. No. 25155 30 0); and benzenesulfonic acid, C10 16 alkyl derivs ( CAS Reg. No. 68584 22 5))

The dietary ( food) assessment was conducted using the generic screening model for estimating inert ingredient dietary exposure as a basis for estimating linear alkyl benzenesulfonate dietary exposure. This form of assessment is unrefined and extremely conservative in nature as the screening model assumes that the inert ingredient is used on all commodities, and that 100 percent of crops are treated with the inert ingredient. Further, the model assumes finite residues for every consumed commodity ( including meat, milk, poultry and eggs) that is included in the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model ( DEEM   ) . A complete explanation of the assumptions used in the generic screening model for estimating inert ingredient dietary exposure is given in Appendix A.

The drinking water exposure analysis is based on a derivation of estimated upper bound drinking water concentrations from these substances' use as pesticide inert ingredients from the FQPA Index Reservoir Screening Tool ( FIRST). The results of the FIRST modeling analysis and the conservative assumptions utilized as inputs into the inert ingredient drinking water exposure assessment model are provided in Appendix B. Page 3 of 12 B. Dietary Risk from Food Based on the toxicity endpoints selected by the Toxicity Advisory Clinic ( TAC) in its meeting of January 8, 2006, a dietary risk assessment was conducted for the inert ingredient linear alkyl benzenesulfonate. The TAC did not select an endpoint for acute dietary exposures as no effects are attributable to a single dose, therefore acute dietary ( food) risk estimate for the inert ingredient use of linear alkyl benzenesulfonate was not performed. The TAC selected an endpoint for chronic dietary exposure to linear alkyl benzenesulfonate of 0.5 mg/ kg/ day ( cPAD= 0.5 mg/ kg/ day). The table below ( Table 2) provides a summary of the results of chronic dietary risk estimates for the inert ingredient use of linear alkyl benzenesulfonate.

Table 2. Estimated Chronic Dietary Exposure for Linear Alkyl Benzenesufonate ( LABS) Population Subgroup1 Generic Estimated Exposure, mg/ kg/ day LABS Estimated Exposure, mg/ kg/ day % cPAD U. S. Population ( total) 0.120 0.1200  24% All infants (< 1 year) 0.245 0.2450  49% Children ( 1 2 years) 0.422 0.4220  84% Children ( 3 5 years) 0.310 0.3100  62% Children ( 6 12 years) 0.174 0.1740  35% Youth ( 13 19 years) 0.100 0.1000  20% Adults ( 20 49 years) 0.087 0.0870  17% Adults ( 50+ years) 0.086 0.0860  17% Females ( 13 49 years) 0.087 0.0870  17%

1Only representative population subgroups are shown.

Rev 01/ 25/ 06 cPAD 0.5 C. Dietary Risk from Drinking Water A January 18, 2006, memorandum from Talia Milano to Jennifer Slotnick and Deborah Smegal entitled " Environmental Fate Assessment of Alkylbenzene Sulfonates for the Registration Eligibility Document ( RED)" provided information on the environmental fate of linear alkyl benzenesulfonates. Based on information presented in that assessment, linear alkyl benzenesulfonates are water soluble, nonvolatile and mobile, but also readily biodegradable. There are no readily available data on the occurrence of linear alkyl benzenesulfonates in ambient or treated drinking water. No ambient water quality criteria, drinking water maximum contaminant levels or health advisory levels have been established for these compounds by EPA's Office of Water. The potential for transport into drinking water resulting from pesticide inert ingredient uses of these substances do Page 4 of 12 exist, therefore an estimate of drinking water concentrations resulting from the inert ingredient uses of these substances was conducted.

As noted above, the TAC did not select an endpoint for acute dietary exposures as no effects are attributable to a single dose, therefore an acute drinking water risk estimate for the inert ingredient use of linear alkyl benzenesulfonate was not performed. The estimated chronic drinking water concentration and drinking water level of concern for chronic exposure to linear alkyl benzenesulfonates is given in Table 3 below.

Table 3. Chronic Drinking Water Exposure Estimates for Inert Ingredient Uses of Linear Alkyl Benzenzesulfonates Population Subgroup EDWC1 ( µ g/ L) DWLOC2 ( µ g/ L) U. S. Population ( total) 6.6 38  1,500 Children ( 1 2 years) 6.6 8  500 1 Estimated Drinking Water Concentration ( EDWC) for chronic drinking water exposure as determined by the use of FIRST modeling analysis described above. [ The EDWC for linear alkyl benzenesulfonates is the value reported as the " Adjusted Annual Average ( Chronic) Untreated Water Concentration" in Appendix B] 2 Drinking Water Level of Comparison ( DWLOC) is the maximum contribution from water allowed in the diet. In this case, since the allowable risk contribution from food is based on a screening level model, the use of a single, deterministic value for the DWLOC is not appropriate. Rather a DWLOC range is given, with the values in the range corresponding to an upper value of range of drinking water concentrations ranging from 100% of the cPAD ( i. e., assuming no food exposure) to a lower value that considers food exposures to be at the dietary screening level value.

D. Conclusions Based on the use of the screening level inert ingredient dietary exposure model and the selected chronic dietary exposure endpoint for linear alkyl benzenesulfonates, there are no concerns for risks associated with dietary ( food) exposures as the estimated dietary exposures for the U. S. population and all population subgroups are below 100% of the cPAD. It should again be noted that this screening level dietary risk assessment is quite conservative in nature, and that the dietary exposure to linear alkyl benzenesulfonates as inert ingredients in pesticide products estimated herein would greatly exceed actual dietary exposures as the uses and effective application rates of linear alkyl benzenesulfonates1 as inert ingredients applied to crops are far less than those uses and application rates utilized in the screening model.

1 A survey of those products listed as containing the inert ingredients benzenesulfonic acid, dodecyl ( CAS Reg. No. 27176 87 0); sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate ( CAS Reg. No. 25155 30 0); and benzenesulfonic acid, C10 16 alkyl derivs ( CAS Reg. No. 68584 22 5) was conducted. The results of that survey indicate that the use of linear alkylbenzenesulfonates as inert ingredients is limited, as nearly all products that do contain linear alkylbenzenesulfonates as inert ingredients have a total linear alkyl benzenesulfonate content of less than 5% w/ w. Additionally, the vast majority of the products that contain linear alkyl benzene sulfonates are herbicide products that typically are applied in a preemergent or early post emergent fashion, use scenarios that result in little or no crop residues. Page 5 of 12 For chronic drinking water exposures to linear alkyl benzenesulfonates as inert ingedients, the DWLOC range for chronic exposure is 38 1500 µ g/ L for the general U. S. population and 8 500 µ g/ L for children 1 2 years old. The EDWC used to assess chronic ( non cancer) dietary risk from drinking water is 6.6 µ g/ L. The chronic estimated concentration is below the DWLOCs for the general U. S. population and all population subgroups. Drinking water risks, therefore, are not of concern.

Based on the use of screening level inert ingredient dietary exposure model and the selected chronic dietary exposure endpoint for linear alkyl benzenesulfonates as well as the estimated upper bound drinking water concentrations from these substances' use as pesticide inert ingredients derived from FIRST, there are no concerns for aggregate dietary and drinking water exposures to linear alkyl benzenesulfonates resulting from their use as pesticide inert ingredients. Page 6 of 12 APPENDIX A Dietary Exposure Model for Inert Ingredients A screening level model for predicting dietary ( food) exposure to inert ingredients was developed and is based on the following assumptions and inputs:

Model Assumptions Actual crop specific residue data for active ingredients can be utilized as surrogate data for inert ingredient residue levels ( including secondary residues in meat, milk, poultry and eggs).

Inert ingredients are used on all crops and 100% of all crops are " treated" with inert ingredients No adjustment made for % of inert in formulation, application rate, or multiple applications of different active ingredient formulations Considers only preharvest applications Model Inputs A group of 57 of the most " significant" active ingredients were considered. These active ingredients included substances in the insecticide ( 20) , fungicide ( 17), and herbicide class ( 20) and were selected based on a overall ranking scheme that included the following components: Overall Use  Based on 1999 data for active ingredient use ( in lbs/ yr). ( All herbicides at > 5 million lbs/ yr and all fungicides and insecticides at > 1 million lbs/ yr were included) Use on crops that are significant contributors to diet ( All a. i. s which had substantial use on crops that make up the " Top 25" kids diet were included). Use on specific crops ( crop by crop pesticide use information was evaluated to identify the most frequently used active ingredients) Actual residue monitoring studies ( active ingredients with the highest frequency of detection)

Model Construct A DEEM    type analysis was performed utilizing the highest established tolerance level residue for each commodity. In those cases where DEEM listed a commodity for which a published tolerance did not exist, the input value was selected based on representative crops or other " default" values ( e. g, use of standard processing factors). A DEEM FCID   , Version 1.3 analyses were performed for both acute and chronic dietary exposure scenarios and the results for each are given in Table 1 and 2. Page 7 of 12 DEEM FCID   Program and Consumption Information Generic inert ingredient acute and chronic dietary exposure assessments were conducted using the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model software with the Food Commodity Intake Database ( DEEM FCID   , Version 1.3), which incorporates consumption data from USDA's Continuing Surveys of Food Intakes by Individuals ( CSFII), 1994 1996 and 1998. The 1994 96 and 998 CSFII data are based on the reported consumption of more than 20,000 individuals over two non consecutive survey days. Foods " as consumed" ( e. g., apple pie) are linked to EPA defined food commodities ( e. g. apples, peeled fruit  cooked; fresh or N/ S; baked; or wheat flour  cooked; fresh or N/ S, baked) using publicly available recipe translation files developed jointly by USDA/ ARS and EPA. Consumption data are averaged for the entire U. S. population and within population subgroups for chronic exposure assessment, but are retained as individual consumption events for acute exposure assessment.

For chronic exposure and risk assessment, an estimate of the residue level in each food or food form ( e. g., orange or orange juice) on the food commodity residue list is multiplied by the average daily consumption estimate for that food/ food form. The resulting residue consumption estimate for each food/ food form is summed with the residue consumption estimates for all other food/ food forms on the commodity residue list to arrive at the total average estimated exposure. Exposure is expressed in mg/ kg body weight/ day. This procedure is performed for each population subgroup.

For acute exposure assessments, individual one day food consumption data are used on an individual by individual basis. The reported consumption amounts of each food item can be multiplied by a residue point estimate and summed to obtain a total daily pesticide exposure for a deterministic ( Tier 1 or Tier 2) exposure assessment, or " matched" in multiple random pairings with residue values and then summed in a probabilistic ( Tier 3/ 4) assessment. For this screening level assessment, only a Tier 1 analysis was performed.

Use of Model in Inert Risk Assessment The results of this model would likely represent an upper bound estimate of likely potential dietary exposure to an inert ingredient resulting from preharvest use. These values could be compared to the expected toxicity in a qualitative ( Tier 1 substance) assessment, or, in those cases where a bounding level risk assessment is necessary, these exposure values could be compared to the selected toxicity endpoints in a % PAD or MOE type approach ( see Figure 1). In cases where this model would yield dietary risk values below the level of concern, no further refinements would be necessary, and the potential dietary exposure and risk could be considered adequately characterized. If this model results in dietary risk, above the level of concern, then additional data, use limitations, and/ or / further refinements would be necessary. Additionally, the use of this model could allow apportionment of the amount of remaining ` acceptable' risk to other routes of exposure. Page 8 of 12 Fictional Example of Use of Dietary Exposure Model in % PAD Approach Dose selected= 500 mg/ kg bw/ day Uncertainty factor= 1000 cPAD= 0.5 mg/ kg bw/ day Dietary exposure= 0.12 mg/ kg/ day % cPAD= 0.12 mg/ kg/ day/ 0.5 mg/ kg bw/ day x100 = 24 Model Limitations and Areas for Further Consideration Actual inert ingredient residue levels While the selected group of active ingredients possesses some chemical structural diversity, could inert ingredients ( by virtue of their uptake into plants and environmental persistence) differ greatly from active ingredients in terms of the nature and magnitude of their plant and animal residues? What about degradates  would they be of concern or need to be separately assessed? Concentration of inert in formulation Initial analysis of " benchmark" products for many of the 57 most " significant" active ingredients indicates that the concentration of the a. i $

any single inert ingredient. If this can be further confirmed, it may allow for a " maximum % inert" adjustment to be used in the model. Differences in product use rate and impacts on residue level. While there are a few outliers, most of these a. i.' s are used in the 1 5 lb ( AI basis) per season use rate. " Generic" inert  The model makes no distinction as to formulation type or timing of application. It may be possible to develop other models for more specific inert use ( e. g., preemergent use only, soil incorporation only). Residues in meat, milk, poultry and eggs  This model used the highest tolerance level residues for input into DEEM   , but it may be possible to utilize residues in livestock feed items and chemical specific information related to uptake or accumulation of secondary residues develop a different set of values on a per inert basis for meat, milk, poultry and eggs.

Table 1. Estimated Chronic Dietary Exposure1 for a Generic Inert Population Subgroup2 Estimated Exposure, mg/ kg/ day U. S. Population ( total) 0.12 All infants (< 1 year) 0.245 Children ( 1 2 years) 0.422 Children ( 3 5 years) 0.31 Children ( 6_ 12 years) 0.174 Youth ( 13 19 years) 0.1 Adults ( 20 49 years) 0.087 Adults ( 50+ years) 0.086 Females ( 13_ 49 years) 0.087 1Exposure estimates are based on highest tolerance level residues of high use active ingredients for all food forms, including meat, milk, poultry, and eggs.

2 Only representative population subgroups are shown. Page 9 of 12 Table 2. Estimated Acute Dietary Exposure1 for a Generic Inert.

Population Subgroup2 Estimated Exposure, mg/ kg/ day 95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile U. S. Population ( total) 0.336 0.643 1.164 All infants (< 1 year) 0.701 1.06 2.056 Children ( 1 2 years) 0.939 1.382 2.106 Children ( 3 5 years) 0.683 1.01 1.476 Children ( 6_ 12 years) 0.395 0.563 0.827 Youth ( 13 19 years) 0.239 0.357 0.815 Adults ( 20 49 years) 0.199 0.295 0.468 Adults ( 50+ years) 0.191 0.263 0.357 Females ( 13_ 49 years) 0.198 0.287 0.415 1Exposure estimates are based on highest tolerance level residues of high use active ingredients for all food forms, including meat, milk, poultry, and eggs.

2 Only representative population subgroups are shown. Page 10 of 12 APPENDIX B Estimated Environmental Concentration ( EEC) of Linear Alkyl Benzenesulfonates in Untreated Drinking Water and Surface Water Resulting from Use as Inert Ingredients I. Drinking Water Monitoring data were not available for surface or ground water, therefore modeling was performed. In the absence of measured chemical properties, known fate and transformation half lives, and actual use and usage information, Tier I models provide a conservative assessment of exposures in which, under almost all conditions, are unlikely to be exceeded. In addition, proper parameterization of higher tier models necessitates measured fate and known usage data. Drinking water exposures were estimated using the Tier I surface water exposure model FQPA Index Reservoir Screening Tool ( FIRST, Version 1.0, dated August 1, 2001). The Tier I ground water exposure model, Screening Concentrations in Ground Water, was not used in this assessment because these compounds are unlikely to result in exposures exceeding surface waster concentrations when measured chemical property and fate data are used. Modeling inputs for fate and transport of the linear alkyl benzenesulfonates were assumed to be stable. This approach is expected to be conservative, resulting in exposures that are unlikely to actually occur in the environment based on physicalchemical inputs and environmental fate and the application rate used. Compounds modeled as stable and very mobile, result in exposures that will be linear with increases in application rate or in numbers of applications. For example, the exposures from a 2 pound application rate will be twice as high from a 1 pound application rate, whether applied at once or separated by time within a year. Environmental fate data and default application rate information are presented in Table 1. The results of the model were then scaled to adjust for an effective application rate of 0.1 lbs/ acre ( based upon a linear alkyl benzenesulfonate weight fraction of 5% ( a > 95th percentile value), a product application rate of 1 lb/ product acre and four applications per year).

Table 1. Linear Alkyl Benzenesulfonate Modeling Input Parameters for FIRST and GENEEC Parameter Value Source Maximum single application rate ( lb/ acre) 1 Assumed.

Application Method Aerial Spray No limits on application method; method yielding most conservative results used Max No. application per year 4 Assumed PCA factor ( decimal) 0.87 ( default) Effland et al ( 2000)

Kd ( mL/ g) 0.01 Assumed Page 11 of 12 Aerobic soil met. t1/ 2 ( d) Stable 1 Assumed Solubility ( mg/ L) 100000 assumed Aerobic aquatic met. t1/ 2 ( d) Stable 1 assumed Hydrolysis ( pH 7) t1/ 2 ( d) Stable 1 assumed Aqueous photolysis t1/ 2 ( d) Stable 1 assumed 1 For the purpose of estimating a high end surface water concentration, linear alkyl benzenesulfonates are assumed to be stable to these degradation pathways on the field and in surface water.

Drinking Water EEC Using FIRST:

RUN No. 1 FOR Generic ON Generic * INPUT VALUES * ____________________________________________________________________ RATE (#/ AC) No. APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE % CROPPED INCORP ONE( MULT) INTERVAL Kd ( PPM ) (% DRIFT) AREA ( IN) ____________________________________________________________________ 1.000( 1.000) 1 1 .0******* AERIAL( 16.0) 87.0 .0 FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES ( DAYS) ____________________________________________________________________ METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED ( FIELD) RAIN/ RUNOFF ( RESERVOIR) ( RES._ EFF) ( RESER.) ( RESER.) ____________________________________________________________________ 1000.00 2 N/ A .00_ .00 .00 .00 UNTREATED WATER CONC ( MICROGRAMS/ LITER ( PPB)) Ver 1.0 AUG 1, 2001 ____________________________________________________________________ PEAK DAY ( ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE ( CHRONIC) CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION ____________________________________________________________________ 92.170 66.089 ADJUSTED UNTREATED WATER CONC ( MICROGRAMS/ LITER ( PPB))

____________________________________________________________________ PEAK DAY ( ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE ( CHRONIC) CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION ____________________________________________________________________ 9.217 6.609 Page 12 of 12 . III. Uncertainties The FIRST model is designed to yield concentration values which exceed those predicted by the linked EPA PRZM and EXAMS models for all but the most vulnerable sites, application patterns and environmental fate properties. PRZM/ EXAMS predictions may exceed FIRST predictions under the following circumstances:

Applications to crops in managed environments known to produce excessive runoff ( e. g., crops grown over plastic mulch).

Applications at sites with hydrologic group D soils which also receive excessively high rainfall ( e. g., EFED sweet potato scenario in southern Louisiana).

Multiple applications over a window of 30 days or longer in exceptionally high rainfall areas ( e. g., far southeastern US).

Linear alkyl benzenesulfonates were assumed to be stable in surface water environments which likely overestimate actual concentrations given the available information related to the ready biodegradability of linear alkylbenzensulfonates.


[Federal Register: December 20, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 243)]
[Notices]
[Page 79360-79361]
[DOCID:fr20de10-924]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 2

December 7, 2010.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2224-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: New York Independent System Operator, Inc. submits
tariff filing per: Errata to NYISO Revised ICAP Demand Curve filing to
be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 12/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101203-5200.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 21, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2307-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: PacifiCorp submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii):
BPA Two-way Operation and Maintenance Agreement to be effective 11/1/
2010.
    Filed Date: 12/07/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101207-5113.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 28, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2308-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc. submits Attachment AE of
its Open Access Transmission Tariff, to be effective 2/6/2011.
    Filed Date: 12/07/2010
    Accession Number: 20101207-5114.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 28, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2309-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii): Formula Update--Midwest to be effective 9/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/07/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101207-5143.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 28, 2010.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to

be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant. In reference to filings
initiating a new proceeding, interventions or protests submitted on or
before the comment deadline need not be served on persons other than
the Applicant.
    As it relates to any qualifying facility filings, the notices of
self-certification [or self-recertification] listed above, do not
institute a proceeding regarding qualifying facility status. A notice
of self-certification [or self-recertification] simply provides
notification that the entity making the filing has determined the
facility named in the notice meets the applicable criteria to be a
qualifying facility. Intervention and/or protest do not lie in dockets
that are qualifying facility self-certifications or self-
recertifications. Any person seeking to challenge such qualifying
facility status may do so by filing a motion pursuant to 18 CFR
292.207(d)(iii). Intervention and protests may be filed in response to
notices of qualifying facility dockets other than self-certifications
and self-recertifications.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-31839 Filed 12-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Kit Arthur<EMAIL_ADDRESS> 07/18/2006 10:27 AM

To

Gary Westefer/R5/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Subject

Fwd: Proposed 50-54 Posted on ROO

Sorry- I forgot to cc you on the original email.

----- Message from "Kit Arthur"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>on Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:07:40 -0400 -----

To:	"Dave Sholtis"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>"Ed Lim" <EMAIL_ADDRESS>"Jeff Mayhugh"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>"Jeremy Carroll"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>"Mike Savage" <EMAIL_ADDRESS>"Pam Allen"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>"Todd Anderson"<EMAIL_ADDRESS> Subject:	Proposed 50-54 Posted on ROO

Proposed rule 3745-50-54, Permit duration, is now available on the

Register of Ohio.  See http://www.registerofohio.state.oh.us .

Proposed: 7/13/06

Ohio EPA public hearing: 8/16/06, 10:00am

comments due (to Kit): 8/16/06, 5:00pm

unconfirmed JCARR hearing date: 8/28/06, 1:00pm

JCARR's jurisdiction expires: 9/16/06 (cannot be adopted before this)

target Effective date (presuming no glitches, legal minimum time

between adoption & effective dates): 10/14/06

Todd, I'll let you know when I get JCARR confirmation, for

scheduling/attendance purposes.

Let me know if you have any questions.  4-2932


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 173 (Friday, September 8, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61963-61964]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19392]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2023-0758]

Safety Zones in Reentry Sites; Jacksonville, Florida

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notification of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is activating three safety zones for the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Commercial Crew
Program 6 (Crew-6) mission reentry vehicle splashdown, and recovery
operations. These operations will occur in the U.S. Exclusive Economic
Zone (EEZ). Our regulation for safety zones in reentry sites within the
Seventh Coast Guard District identifies the regulated areas for this
event. No U.S.-flagged vessel may enter the safety zones unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Savannah or a designated
representative. Foreign-flagged vessels are encouraged to remain
outside the safety zones.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.T07-0806 will be enforced for the
safety zones identified in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below
for the dates and times specified.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notification of enforcement, call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade
Anthony Harris, Marine Safety Unit Savannah, Waterways Division, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email at
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: With this document, the Coast Guard Captain
of the Port (COTP) Savannah is activating a portion of the safety zone
as listed in 33 CFR 165.T07-0806(a)(1), and the safety zones listed in
(a)(2) and (a)(3) on September 4, 2023 through September 11, 2023, for
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Commercial
Crew Program 6 (Crew-6) mission reentry vehicle splashdown, and the
associated recovery operations in the U.S. EEZ. These safety zones are
located within the COTP Savannah Area of Responsibility (AOR) offshore
of

Jacksonville, Florida. The Coast Guard is activating these safety zones
in order to protect vessels and waterway users from the potential
hazards created by reentry vehicle splashdowns and recovery operations.
In accordance with the general regulations in 33 CFR part 165, subpart
C, no U.S.-flagged vessel may enter the safety zones unless authorized
by the COTP Savannah or a designated representative except as provided
in Sec.  165.T07-0806(d)(3). All foreign-flagged vessels are encouraged
to remain outside the safety zones.
    There are four other safety zones listed in Sec.  165.T07-
0806(a)(2) through (a)(5), which are located within the COTP St.
Petersburg and Jacksonville AORs, that are being simultaneously
activated through separate notifications of enforcement of the
regulation document issued under Docket Numbers USCG-2023-0719, and
USCG-2023-0757.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ These notifications of enforcement of the regulation can be
found at: https://regulations.gov by searching for docket number
USCG-2023-0719, and USCG-2023-0757.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Twenty-four hours prior to the Crew-6 recovery operations, the COTP
Jacksonville, the COTP Savannah, the COTP St. Petersburg, or designated
representative will inform the public that whether any of the five
safety zones described in Sec.  165.T07-0806, paragraph (a), will
remain activated (subject to enforcement). If one of the safety zones
described in Sec.  165.T07-0806, paragraph (a), remains activated it
will be enforced for four hours prior to the Crew-6 splashdown and
remain activated until announced by Broadcast Notice to Mariners on
VHF-FM channel 16, and/or Marine Safety Information Bulletin (as
appropriate) that the safety zone is no longer subject to enforcement.
After the Crew-6 reentry vehicle splashdown, the COTP or a designated
representative will grant general permission to come no closer than 3
nautical miles of any reentry vehicle or space support vessel engaged
in the recovery operations, within the activated safety zone described
in Sec.  165.T07-0806, paragraph (a). Once the reentry vehicle, and any
personnel involved in reentry service, are removed from the water and
secured onboard a space support vessel, the COTP or designated
representative will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners on VHF-FM
channel 16 announcing the activated safety zone is no longer subject to
enforcement. The recovery operations are expected to last approximately
one hour.
    The Coast Guard may be assisted by other Federal, State, or local
law enforcement agencies in enforcing this regulation.

    Dated: September 1, 2023.
Nathaniel L. Robinson,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Savannah.
[FR Doc. 2023-19392 Filed 9-7-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: May 25, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 100)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 29296-29302]
[DOCID:fr25my10-23]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 67

[Docket ID FEMA-2010-0003; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1122]

Proposed Flood Elevation Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on the proposed Base (1% annual-chance)
Flood Elevations (BFEs) and proposed BFE modifications for the
communities listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to
seek general information and comment regarding the proposed regulatory
flood elevations for the reach described by the downstream and upstream
locations in the table below. The BFEs and modified BFEs are a part of
the floodplain management measures that the community is required
either to adopt or to show evidence of having in effect in order to
qualify or remain qualified for participation in the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, these elevations, once
finalized, will be used by insurance agents and others to calculate
appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and the
contents in those buildings.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before August 23, 2010.

ADDRESSES: The corresponding preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map
(FIRM) for the proposed BFEs for each community is available for
inspection at the community's map repository. The respective addresses
are listed in the table below.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-1122, to
Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief,
Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472,
(202) 646-2820, or (e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) proposes to make determinations of BFEs and modified BFEs for
each community listed below, in accordance with section 110 of the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR
67.4(a).
    These proposed BFEs and modified BFEs, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. These proposed elevations
are used to meet the floodplain management requirements of the NFIP and
also are used to calculate the appropriate flood insurance premium
rates for new buildings built after these elevations are made final,
and for the contents in those buildings.
    Comments on any aspect of the Flood Insurance Study and FIRM, other
than the proposed BFEs, will be considered. A letter acknowledging
receipt of any comments will not be sent.
    National Environmental Policy Act. This proposed rule is
categorically excluded from the requirements of 44 CFR part 10,
Environmental Consideration. An environmental impact assessment has not
been prepared.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood elevation determinations are
not within the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
    Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. This
proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under the criteria
of section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as amended.
    Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This proposed rule involves no
policies that have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
    Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This proposed rule
meets the applicable standards of Executive Order 12988.

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67

    Administrative practice and procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.

    Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 67--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 67 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR,
1979 Comp., p. 376.

Sec.  67.4  [Amended]

    2. The tables published under the authority of Sec.  67.4 are
proposed to be amended as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     * Elevation in feet
                                                                     (NGVD)  + Elevation
                                                                       in feet (NAVD)
                                                                      Depth in
         Flooding source(s)              Location of referenced       feet above ground    Communities affected
                                                elevation           [caret] Elevation in
                                                                        meters (MSL)
                                                                   ----------------------
                                                                    Effective   Modified
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Fairbanks-North Star Borough, Alaska, and Incorporated Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Groundwater seepage from Tanana       An area north of the Tanana        +431       +432  Fairbanks-North Star
 River and Chena River.                River levee and south of                            Borough.
                                       Mitchell Expressway from a
                                       point approximately 1,900
                                       feet southwest of the
                                       intersection of Airport
                                       Dike Road and Airport
                                       Perimeter Road to the
                                       intersection of Airport Way
                                       and Mitchell Expressway.
                                      An area just north of and          None   +432-434
                                       adjacent to Mitchell
                                       Expressway from the
                                       intersection of Peger Road
                                       and Mitchell Expressway to
                                       the east to approximately
                                       930 feet southeast of the
                                       intersection of Old Airport
                                       Road and Mitchell
                                       Expressway to the west.
                                      An area north of the Tanana        None       +446
                                       River levee and south of
                                       Mitchell Expressway from
                                       the intersection of Old
                                       Richardson Highway and
                                       Richardson Highway to a
                                       point approximately 1,800
                                       feet south of the
                                       intersection of Lake View
                                       Terrace Road and Frontier
                                       Avenue.
                                      An area bound by Peger Road        None   +433-437
                                       to the west, Eagan Avenue
                                       to the north, Lathrop
                                       Street to the east, and
                                       Mitchell Expressway to the
                                       south.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.
[caret] Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter.
** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream
 reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood Insurance Rate Map located at
 the community map repository (see below) for exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.

Send comments to Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
 Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

                                                    ADDRESSES

Fairbanks-North Star Borough
Maps are available for inspection at the Borough Administrative Center, 809 Pioneer Road, Fairbanks, AK 99701.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Fayette County, Iowa, and Incorporated Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Otter Creek (City of Elgin).........  Approximately 1,550 feet           None       +804  Unincorporated Areas
                                       upstream of the bridge at                           of Fayette County.
                                       Cedar Road.
                                      Approximately 80 feet              None       +831
                                       downstream of the bridge at
                                       Mill Street.
Otter Creek (City of Oelwein).......  Approximately 460 feet             None      +1004  Unincorporated Areas
                                       upstream of West Charles                            of Fayette County.
                                       Street.
                                      City of Oelwein/Fayette            None      +1019
                                       County (unincorporated
                                       areas) corporate limit
                                       approximately 1.4 mile
                                       upstream of Lake Oelwein
                                       Dam.
Turkey River........................  Approximately 0.3 mile             None       +802  Unincorporated Areas
                                       downstream of the Center                            of Fayette County.
                                       Street Bridge.
                                      Approximately 1.6 mile             None       +809
                                       upstream of the Center
                                       Street Bridge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.
[caret] Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter.
** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream
 reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood Insurance Rate Map located at
 the community map repository (see below) for exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.

Send comments to Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
 Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

                                                    ADDRESSES

                                     Unincorporated Areas of Fayette County
Maps are available for inspection at the Fayette County Courthouse, 114 North Vine Street, West Union, IA 52175.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                 Henry County, Illinois, and Incorporated Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Geneseo Creek.......................  Approximately 0.13 mile            None       +615  City of Geneseo,
                                       downstream of Elk Street.                           Unincorporated Areas
                                                                                of Henry County.
                                      Approximately 0.59 mile            None       +642
                                       upstream of I-80.
Rock River..........................  Approximately 0.75 mile            +583       +584  Unincorporated Areas
                                       downstream of Hurd Road (in                         of Henry County.
                                       Whiteside County).
                                      Approximately 2.5 miles            +583       +585
                                       upstream of Hurd Road (in
                                       Whiteside County).
Rock River..........................  Approximately 1.04 mile            +578       +577  Village of Cleveland.
                                       upstream of I-80.
                                      Approximately 1.63 mile            +579       +578
                                       upstream of I-80.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.
[caret] Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter.
** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream
 reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood Insurance Rate Map located at
 the community map repository (see below) for exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.

Send comments to Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
 Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

                                                    ADDRESSES

City of Geneseo
Maps are available for inspection at City Hall, 101 South State Street, Geneseo, IL 61254.

                                      Unincorporated Areas of Henry County
Maps are available for inspection at the Henry County Courthouse, 307 West Center Street, Cambridge, IL 61238.

Village of Cleveland
Maps are available for inspection at the Village Hall, 408 Jackson Street, Cleveland, IL 61241.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Jessamine County, Kentucky, and Incorporated Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
East Hickman Creek Tributary 1        From the confluence with           None       +872  Unincorporated Areas
 (Backwater effects from East          East Hickman Creek to                               of Jessamine County.
 Hickman Creek).                       approximately 580 feet
                                       upstream of the confluence
                                       with East Hickman Creek.
Hickman Creek (Backwater effects      From the confluence with the       None       +566  Unincorporated Areas
 from Kentucky River).                 Kentucky River to                                   of Jessamine County.
                                       approximately 1.9 mile
                                       upstream of the confluence
                                       with the Kentucky River.
Jessamine Creek (Backwater effects    From the confluence with the       None       +559  Unincorporated Areas
 from Kentucky River).                 Kentucky River to                                   of Jessamine County.
                                       approximately 0.9 mile
                                       upstream of the confluence
                                       with Jessamine Creek
                                       Tributary 9.
Jessamine Creek Tributary 9           From the confluence with           None       +559  Unincorporated Areas
 (Backwater effects from Kentucky      Jessamine Creek to                                  of Jessamine County.
 River).                               approximately 785 feet
                                       upstream of the confluence
                                       with Jessamine Creek.
Kentucky River......................  Approximately 1,770 feet           +545       +548  Unincorporated Areas
                                       downstream of the                                   of Jessamine County.
                                       confluence with Kentucky
                                       River Tributary 4.
                                      Approximately 2 miles              +581       +582
                                       upstream of the confluence
                                       with Marble Creek.
Kentucky River Tributary 2            From the confluence with the       None       +573  Unincorporated Areas
 (Backwater effects from Kentucky      Kentucky River to                                   of Jessamine County.
 River).                               approximately 1,445 feet
                                       upstream of River Road (KY-
                                       1541).
Kentucky River Tributary 4            From the confluence with the       +545       +548  Unincorporated Areas
 (Backwater effects from Kentucky      Kentucky River to                                   of Jessamine County.
 River).                               approximately 0.4 mile
                                       upstream of the confluence
                                       with the Kentucky River.
Kentucky River Tributary 33           From the confluence with the       None       +569  Unincorporated Areas
 (Backwater effects from Kentucky      Kentucky River to                                   of Jessamine County.
 River).                               approximately 1,900 feet
                                       upstream of the confluence
                                       with the Kentucky River.
Kentucky River Tributary 83           From the confluence with the       None       +576  Unincorporated Areas
 (Backwater effects from Kentucky      Kentucky River to                                   of Jessamine County.
 River).                               approximately 1,320 feet
                                       upstream of the confluence
                                       with the Kentucky River.
Left Branch Tributary to Town Fork..  At the confluence with             None       +922  Unincorporated Areas
                                       Tributary to Town Fork.                             of Jessamine County,
                                                                                City of
                                                                                Nicholasville.
                                      Approximately 385 feet             None       +923
                                       upstream of the confluence
                                       with Tributary to Town Fork.

Little Hickman Creek (Backwater       From the confluence with the       None       +566  Unincorporated Areas
 effects from Kentucky River).         Kentucky River to                                   of Jessamine County.
                                       approximately 0.7 mile
                                       upstream of the confluence
                                       with the Kentucky River.
Marble Creek (Backwater effects from  From the confluence with the       None       +580  Unincorporated Areas
 Kentucky River).                      Kentucky River to                                   of Jessamine County.
                                       approximately 0.5 mile
                                       upstream of the confluence
                                       with the Kentucky River.
Tributary to Town Fork..............  At the confluence with Town        None       +914  City of Nicholasville,
                                       Fork.                                               Unincorporated Areas
                                                                                of Jessamine County.
                                      Approximately 1,080 feet           None       +927
                                       upstream of Miles Road.
West Hickman Creek Tributary 1        From the confluence with           None       +884  Unincorporated Areas
 (Backwater effects from West          West Hickman Creek to                               of Jessamine County.
 Hickman Creek).                       approximately 90 feet
                                       upstream of West Hickman
                                       Plant Road.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.
[caret] Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter.
** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream
 reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood Insurance Rate Map located at
 the community map repository (see below) for exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.

Send comments to Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
 Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

                                                    ADDRESSES

City of Nicholasville
Maps are available for inspection at 517 North Main Street, Nicholasville, KY 40340.

                                    Unincorporated Areas of Jessamine County
Maps are available for inspection at City Hall, 517 North Main Street, Nicholasville, KY 40356.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 Ingham County, Michigan, and Incorporated Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deer Creek..........................  At CSX Railway..............       None       +864  City of Williamston,
                                                                                Township of
                                                                                Wheatfield.
                                      Approximately 0.4 mile             None       +864
                                       upstream of Wallace Street.
Moon and Hamilton County Drain......  At Detention Area F Control        *860       +861  City of Lansing.
                                       Structure.
                                      At I-96/69..................       *868       +863
Red Cedar River.....................  Approximately 1.4 mile             None       +868  City of Williamston,
                                       upstream of the upstream                            Township of Leroy,
                                       crossing at North Putnam                            Township of Locke,
                                       Street.                                             Township of
                                                                                Wheatfield, Township
                                                                                of Williamstown,
                                                                                Village of
                                                                                Webberville.
                                      At Grammer Road North.......       None       +875
Remey Chandler Drain/Sanderson Drain  Approximately 0.7 mile             None       +844  City of East Lansing,
                                       downstream of West Lake                             Charter Township of
                                       Lansing Road.                                       Meridian.
                                      At West Lake Lansing Road...       None       +844
Willow Creek........................  Approximately 1,250 feet           None       +893  Township of Vevay.
                                       upstream of U.S. Route 127.
                                      Approximately 0.58 mile            None       +893
                                       upstream of U.S. Route 127.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.
[caret] Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter.
** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream
 reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood Insurance Rate Map located at
 the community map repository (see below) for exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.

Send comments to Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
 Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

                                                    ADDRESSES

Charter Township of Meridian
Maps are available for inspection at Meridian Township Hall, 5151 Marsh Road, Okemos, MI 48864.

City of East Lansing
Maps are available for inspection at City Hall, 410 Abbott Road, East Lansing, MI 48823.

City of Lansing
Maps are available for inspection at City Hall, 124 West Michigan Avenue, Lansing, MI 48933.

City of Williamston
Maps are available for inspection at City Hall, 161 East Grand River Avenue, Williamston, MI 48895.

Township of Leroy
Maps are available for inspection at Leroy Township Hall, 315 West Walnut Street, Webberville, MI 48892.

Township of Locke
Maps are available for inspection at Locke Township Hall, 3805 Bell Oak Road, Williamston, MI 48895.

Township of Vevay
Maps are available for inspection at Vevay Township Hall, 780 South Eden Road, Mason, MI 48854.

Township of Wheatfield
Maps are available for inspection at Wheatfield Township Hall, 985 East Hold Road, Williamston, MI 48895.

Township of Williamstown
Maps are available for inspection at the Township Hall, 4990 North Zimmer Road, Williamston, MI 48895.

Village of Webberville
Maps are available for inspection at the Village Hall, 115 South Main Street, Webberville, MN 48892.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Attala County, Mississippi, and Incorporated Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canal Creek.........................  Approximately 700 feet             +403       +404  City of Kosciusko.
                                       downstream of Jefferson
                                       Street.
                                      Approximately 500 feet             +409       +411
                                       downstream of Veterans
                                       Memorial Highway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.
[caret] Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter.
** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream
 reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood Insurance Rate Map located at
 the community map repository (see below) for exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.

Send comments to Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
 Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

                                                    ADDRESSES

City of Kosciusko
Maps are available for inspection at 222 East Washington Street, Kosciusko, MS 39090.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Wood County, Ohio, and Incorporated Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crane Creek.........................  Approximately 0.5 mile             None       +609  Unincorporated Areas
                                       downstream of State Highway                         of Wood County.
                                       51.
                                      At State Highway 51.........       None       +609
Maumee River........................  At the Wood/Lucas county           +577       +579  City of Rossford,
                                       boundary.                                           Village of Grand
                                                                                Rapids.
                                      At the Wood/Henry county           None       +649
                                       boundary.
North Branch Portage River..........  Approximately 1,000 feet           None       +668  City of Bowling Green,
                                       downstream of Highway 6.                            Unincorporated Areas
                                                                                of Wood County.
                                      Approximately 1,650 feet           None       +678
                                       upstream of State Highway
                                       25.
Rocky Ford Creek Tributary..........  Approximately 130 feet             None       +725  Village of North
                                       downstream of North                                 Baltimore.
                                       Baltimore Road.
                                      Approximately 400 feet             None       +726
                                       upstream of North Baltimore
                                       Road.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.
[caret] Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter.
** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream
 reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood Insurance Rate Map located at
 the community map repository (see below) for exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.

Send comments to Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
 Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

                                                    ADDRESSES

City of Bowling Green
Maps are available for inspection at City Hall, 304 North Church Street, Bowling Green, OH 43402.

City of Rossford
Maps are available for inspection at City Hall, 133 Osborn Street, Rossford, OH 43460.

                                       Unincorporated Areas of Wood County
Maps are available for inspection at the Wood County Office Building, 1 Courthouse Square, Bowling Green, OH
 43402.

Village of Grand Rapids
Maps are available for inspection at the Village Hall, 17460 Sycamore Road, Grand Rapids, OH 43522.

Village of North Baltimore
Maps are available for inspection at the Village Hall, 205 North Main Street, North Baltimore, OH 45872.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              Dillon County, South Carolina, and Incorporated Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bear Swamp Creek....................  Just upstream of West 5th          None        +81  Town of Lake View.
                                       Avenue.
                                      Approximately 900 feet             None        +92
                                       upstream of Cedar Street.
Little Pee Dee River................  Approximately 1,200 feet           None        +85  Unincorporated Areas
                                       upstream of the confluence                          of Dillon County.
                                       with Maple Swamp.
                                      Approximately 1,600 feet           None        +87
                                       upstream of State Route 9.
Maple Swamp.........................  At the confluence with the         None        +85  Town of Dillon,
                                       Little Pee Dee River.                               Unincorporated Areas
                                                                                of Dillon County.
                                      Approximately 200 feet             None       +104
                                       upstream of the railroad.
Maple Swamp Tributary 5.............  At the confluence with Maple       None       +106  Town of Dillon,
                                       Swamp.                                              Unincorporated Areas
                                                                                of Dillon County.
                                      Approximately 1,400 feet           None       +113
                                       upstream of Longstreet Road.
Reedy Creek Tributary 1.............  Approximately 3,000 feet           None        +88  Town of Latta,
                                       downstream of Academy                               Unincorporated Areas
                                       Street.                                             of Dillon County.
                                      Just upstream of the               None       +103
                                       railroad.
Reedy Creek Tributary 2.............  Approximately 2,000 feet           None        +93  Town of Latta,
                                       downstream of West Academy                          Unincorporated Areas
                                       Street.                                             of Dillon County.
                                      Approximately 600 feet             None       +102
                                       upstream of Manning View
                                       Road.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.
[caret] Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter.
** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream
 reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood Insurance Rate Map located at
 the community map repository (see below) for exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.

Send comments to Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
 Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

                                                    ADDRESSES

                                      Unincorporated Areas of Dillon County
Maps are available for inspection at 109 South 3rd Street, Dillon, SC 29536.

Town of Dillon
Maps are available for inspection at 401 West Main Street, Dillon, SC 29536.

Town of Lake View
Maps are available for inspection at 205 North Main Street, Lake View, SC 29563.

Town of Latta
Maps are available for inspection at 107 Northwest Railroad Avenue, Latta, SC 29565.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Jones County, Texas, and Incorporated Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lake Fort Phantom Hill..............  Just downstream of County        +1,641     +1,642  City of Abilene,
                                       Highway 1082.                                       Unincorporated Areas
                                                                                of Jones County.
                                      Approximately 300 feet             None     +1,656
                                       downstream of County Road
                                       341.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.

 Depth in feet above ground.
[caret] Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter.
** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream
 reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood Insurance Rate Map located at
 the community map repository (see below) for exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.

Send comments to Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
 Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

                                                    ADDRESSES

City of Abilene
Maps are available for inspection at City Hall, 555 Walnut Street, Abilene, TX 79601.

                                      Unincorporated Areas of Jones County
Maps are available for inspection at the Jones County Courthouse, 1100 12th Street, Anson, TX 79501.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: May 11, 2010.
Sandra K. Knight,
Deputy Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administrator, Mitigation,
Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-12493 Filed 5-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 201 (Thursday, October 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 72058]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23104]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER23-2171-000]

Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.; Notice
of Conference Call

    On Friday, October 20, 2023, Commission staff will hold a
conference call with Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association,
Inc. (Tri-State) beginning at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time). The purpose of
the conference call is to clarify the following statements made by Tri-
State in the June 16, 2023 transmittal letter to its formula rate
filing in Docket No. ER23-2171-000: ``Given that an order on the
Initial Decision has not yet issued, Tri-State is filing this rate to
be consistent with its prior rates and cooperative principles. This
filing will be adjusted accordingly in the event of a future Commission
order that includes a conflicting directive.'' \1\ The discussion
during the conference call will be limited solely to whether Tri-State
intends to submit an amended filing as referenced in these statements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Tri-State Transmittal at 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    All interested parties are invited to listen by phone. The
conference call will not be webcasted or transcribed. However, an audio
listen-only line will be provided. Those wishing to access the listen-
only line must email Sean Pauley at [email protected] by 5:00 p.m.
(Eastern Time) on Thursday October 19, 2023, with your name, email, and
phone number, in order to receive the call-in information before the
conference call. Please use the following text for the subject line,
``ER23-2171-000 listen-only line registration.''
    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please
send an email to [email protected] or call toll free 1 (866) 208-
3372 (voice) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY), or send a FAX to<PHONE_NUMBER>
with the required accommodations.
    For additional information, please contact Sean Pauley at (202)
502-6766 or [email protected].

    Dated: October 13, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-23104 Filed 10-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P