[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34033-34034]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13880]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2149-000]

Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County; Notice of
Authorization for Continued Project Operation

    On May 27, 2010, the Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas
County, licensee for the Wells Hydroelectric Project, filed an
Application for a New License pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA)
and the Commission's regulations thereunder. The Wells Hydroelectric
Project is located on the Columbia River in Douglas, Okanogan, and
Chelan Counties, Washington.
    The license for Project No. 2149 was issued for a period ending May
31, 2012. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 USC 808(a)(1), requires the
Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue from year-to-
year an annual license to the then licensee under the terms and
conditions of the prior license until a new license is issued, or the
project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 15 or any other
applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior license waived
the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based on section 9(b)
of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as set forth
at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has filed an
application for a subsequent license, the licensee may continue to
operate the project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the
license after the minor or minor part license expires, until the
Commission acts on

its application. If the licensee of such a project has not filed an
application for a subsequent license, then it may be required, pursuant
to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to continue project operations until the Commission
issues someone else a license for the project or otherwise orders
disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 2149 is issued to
the Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County for a period
effective June 1, 2012 through May 31, 2013, or until the issuance of a
new license for the project or other disposition under the FPA,
whichever comes first. If issuance of a new license (or other
disposition) does not take place on or before May 31, 2013, notice is
hereby given that, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under
section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is renewed automatically without further
order or notice by the Commission, unless the Commission orders
otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is
hereby given that the Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County
is authorized to continue operation of the Wells Hydroelectric Project,
until such time as the Commission acts on its application for a
subsequent license.

    Dated: May 31, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-13880 Filed 6-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: April 2, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 62)]
[Notices]
[Page 15733-15734]
[DOCID:fr02ap07-116]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-55533; File No. SR-Amex-2007-13]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Exchange Rules
Regarding Specialist Commissions

March 26, 2007.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 29, 2007, the American Stock Exchange LLC (``Amex'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the
Amex. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on
the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rules 154-AEMI and 154-AEMI One to
extend its rule regarding specialist commissions. The text of the
proposed rule change is available at http://www.amex.com, at the

Exchange's principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference
Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange recently adopted Rule 154(b) setting forth the
circumstances under which specialists may charge members and member
organizations a commission for executing orders in equities.\3\ The
Exchange adopted this rule to provide consistency and clarity to all
members and the public that orders sent to the Amex will not be subject
to excessive or arbitrary costs; and to preserve the cost
competitiveness of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See, Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55008 (December 22,
2006), 72 FR 597 (January 5, 2007) (Order approving SR-Amex 2006-
98).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange now proposes to adopt subparagraph (k) to Rule 154-
AEMI and to Rule 154-AEMI One to: (1) Extend the application of the
prohibitions on specialist commissions to Exchange Traded Fund Shares
(``ETFs'') and equities trading on the AEMI System; (2) expand the
prohibition on specialist commissions to market at the close orders and
limit at the close orders; and (3) specify that specialist commissions
can only be charged for orders that are executed and not for orders
that are cancelled or expire unexecuted. Thus proposed Rules 154-AEMI
(k) and 154-AEMI One (k) would prohibit specialists from charging a
commission for orders or portions of orders that have not been
executed. This includes but is not limited to, a prohibition on
specialists charging for order cancellations and orders that expire due
to the passage of time.\4\ As noted above, the proposed rule will
extend the prohibitions in Rule 154(b) to ETFs and equities now trading
on the AEMI System which include prohibiting specialists from charging
a commission on off floor orders that are electronically delivered to
the specialist except in cases of orders that require special handling
by the specialist or for which the specialist provides a service. The
proposed rule would also prohibit specialists from billing for
electronically delivered orders that are executed automatically by the
Exchange's order processing facilities upon receipt. Orders executed on
an opening or reopening would not be ``billable.'' In addition,
proposed Rules 154-AEMI (k) and 154-AEMI One (k) will reference Rule
152-AEMI (c) or Rule 152-AEMI One (c), respectively, which prohibits
specialists from charging a commission where they act as principal in
the execution of an order entrusted to them as agent. The proposed rule
will also set forth the types of orders specialists would be allowed
(but not required) to bill a commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Commission made minor clarifications to this sentence
pursuant to a telephone call with the Exchange. See telephone call
by and between Rahman Harrison, Special Counsel, Division of Market
Regulation, Commission, and Claire P. McGrath, Senior Vice President
and General Counsel, Amex, on February, 28, 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In general, ``routine'' orders are not subject to specialist
commissions while orders that require special handling or for which the
specialist provides a service may be subject to a commission. Thus,
proposed Rules 154-AEMI (k) and 154-AEMI One (k) (consistent with the
recently adopted Rule 154(b)) will provide that specialists may (but
are not required to) bill for: (i) Limit orders that remain on the book
for more than two minutes; (ii) tick sensitive orders (e.g., an order
to sell short in a security subject to the Commission's ``tick-test'');
(iii) stop or stop limit orders; (iv) fill-or-kill and immediate-or-
cancel orders; and (v) orders for the account of a competing market
maker.\5\ It should be noted that the proposed rules eliminate the
following order types from the list of orders for which the specialist
may bill a commission as set forth in Rule 154(b) since these order
types are not used in the AEMI System: (i) A non-regular way settlement
(market or limit) order; and (ii) a market or marketable limit order
stopped at one price and executed at a better price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Commission made minor conforming changes to this
sentence pursuant to a telephone call with the Exchange. See
telephone call by and between Rahman Harrison, Special Counsel,
Division of Market Regulation, Commission, and Claire P. McGrath,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Amex, on February, 28,
2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specialist commissions increase the cost of doing business on the
Exchange. These increased costs weaken the Exchange's competitive
position relative to other markets as other markets do not need to
compete as aggressively with the Exchange to cut their prices to
investors. The Exchange consequently believes that the proposed rule
would benefit investors if implemented and would strengthen the
Exchange's competitive position.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations under the Act applicable to a
national securities exchange and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) \6\ of the Act. Specifically, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of Section
6(b)(5) \7\ of the Act that the rules of an exchange be designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. In addition, the Exchange believes
that the proposed rule change is consistent with

the provisions of Section 6(b)(4),\8\ which requires that the rules of
an exchange provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members and issuers and other persons
using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding, or (ii) as to
which the Amex consents, the Commission will:
    A. By order approve such proposed rule change; or
    B. Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-Amex-2007-13 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Amex-2007-13. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make publicly available. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-Amex-2007-13 and should be submitted on or before April
23, 2007.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-5982 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 11, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70360-70363]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22340]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2023-0815]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Southport Swing Bridge, Southport, ME

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary interim rule and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
navigable waters of the Townsend Gut within a 50-yard radius from the
center of the Southport Swing Bridge, in Southport, ME. When enforced,
this regulation will prohibit waterside entry of vessels or persons
into the safety zone unless authorized by Captain of the Port for
Sector Northern New England or a designated representative. The safety
zone is necessary to protect personnel, vessels, and marine environment
from potential hazards created by construction and remediation of the
Southport Swing Bridge.

DATES: This rule is effective from October 23, 2023 through May 17,
2024. Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard
on or before December 11, 2023.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2023-0815 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
    You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-2023-0815
using the Federal Decision-Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFROMATION section below for
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email MSTC Zachary Wetzel, Sector Northern New England, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Northern New England
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On August 29, 2023, the Coast Guard was made aware by the Cianbro
Companies of the Southport Swing Bridge rehabilitation and construction
project in Southport, ME, Maine DOT Project WIN 021751.01. Marine
construction actions will consist of coating repairs, replacement of
the fender and pier system, full machinery and controls system upgrade,
deck replacement and a number of structural repairs. During these
construction activities work and crane barges are expected to block the
channel and the bridge will be unable to open for vessel traffic. The
Captain of the Port Sector Northern New England (COTP) has determined
that potential hazards associated with the bridge construction would be
a safety concern for anyone within a 50-yard radius of the center point
of the bridge. If the project is completed prior to May 17, 2024,

enforcement of the safety zone will be suspended and notice given via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, Local Notice to Mariners, or both. The
Coast Guard anticipates that this safety zone period is the first in a
several year multi-phase bridge construction and remediation project.
The Coast Guard will consider comments in issuing a subsequent
temporary interim rule or temporary final rule.
    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary interim rule without
prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under
section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C.
553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without
prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause
finds that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because doing so
would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest. The notice
allowing the construction project to proceed and providing updated
timelines for the project was only recently finalized and provided to
the Coast Guard, which did not give the Coast Guard enough time to
publish a NPRM, take public comments, and issue a final rule before the
existing regulation expires. Timely action is needed to respond to the
potential safety hazards associated with the construction and
rehabilitation the Southport Swing Bridge. It would be impracticable
and contrary to the public interest to publish a NPRM because we must
establish the safety zone as soon as possible to protect the safety of
the waterway users, construction crew, and other personnel associated
with the bridge project. A delay of the project to accommodate a full
notice and comment period would delay necessary operations, result in
increased costs, and delay the completion date of the bridge project
and subsequent reopening of the Southport Swing Bridge for normal
operations.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For reasons stated in the
preceding paragraph, delaying the effective date of this rule would be
impracticable and contrary to the public interest because timely action
is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards associated with
the project.
    We are soliciting comments on this rulemaking. If the Coast Guard
determines that changes to the temporary interim rule are necessary, we
will publish a temporary final rule or other appropriate document.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    Coast Guard is issuing this temporary interim rule under authority
in 46 U.S.C. 70034. The COTP determined that potential hazards
associated with this bridge construction and remediation project will
be a safety concern for anyone within the work zone through May 17,
2024. The construction and remediation of the bridge will be extremely
complex and present many safety hazards including overhead operations,
potential falling debris, and barges positioned along the length of the
bridge. In order to mitigate the inherent risks involved with the
remediation of a bridge, it is necessary to control vessel movement
through the area. The purpose of this temporary interim rule is to
ensure the safety of the waterway users, the public, and construction
workers for the duration of the bridge construction. In order to
minimize such unexpected or uncontrolled movement of water no vessel
may stop, moor, anchor, or loiter within the safety zone at any time
unless receiving permission from the COTP or a designated
representative. This temporary interim rule is needed to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable waters
within the safety zone during the bridge construction project.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This temporary interim rule establishes a temporary safety zone
from October 23, 2023, through May 17, 2024. This rule will prohibit
all persons and vessel traffic from the safety zone unless exceptions
are authorized by the COTP or a designated representative.
    The Coast Guard will notify the public and local mariners of this
safety zone through appropriate means, which may include, but are not
limited to, publication in the Federal Register, the Local Notice to
Mariners, and Broadcast Notice to Mariners via marine Channel 16 (VHF-
FM) in advance of any enforcement.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866, as amended by
Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review). Accordingly,
this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. The safety zone
is only in effect for navigable water of the Townsend Gut within a 50-
yard radius of the center point of the Southport Swing Bridge. This
waterway is typically transited by smaller craft on an infrequent basis
over the winter months. Vessel traffic is able to safely transit around
this safety zone with a slight delay (approximately 30-120 minutes) by
transiting around Southport Island to reach any destination on the
other side of Townsend Gut. Additionally, the rule allows vessels to
seek permission to enter the zone. Moreover, the Coast Guard will
notify the public of enforcement of this rule via appropriate means,
such as via Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners
via marine Channel 16 (VHF-FM).

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this temporary interim rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this temporary interim rule. If this rule
would affect your small

business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
temporary safety zone that will prohibit entry within a 50-yard radius
from the center of the Southport Swing Bridge during its construction
and rehabilitation. It is categorically excluded from further review
under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual
023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is available in the docket. For
instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

VI. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision Making Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. To do
so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2023-0815 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If your material cannot be submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions.
    Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as described in
the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting & Related
Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will also be
placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following instructions
on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked Questions web page.
We review all comments received, but we will only post comments that
address the topic of the rule. We may choose not to post off-topic,
inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we receive.
    Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comment we post
to http://www.regulations.gov will include any personal information you
have provided. For more about privacy and submissions to the docket in
response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking System of Records
notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).

List of Subjects in 33 CFR part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T01-0815 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T01-0815   Safety Zone; Southport Swing Bridge, Southport,
ME.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone. All navigable
waters on Townsend Gut within a 50-yard radius from the center of the
Southport Swing Bridge, in Southport, ME, in position 43[deg]50'33.9''
N 69[deg]39'14.4'' W (NAD 83).
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section:
    Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant,

petty officer, or any federal, state, or local law enforcement officer
who has been designated by the Captain of the Port Northern New England
(COTP), to act on his or her behalf. The designated representative may
be on an official patrol vessel or may be on shore and will communicate
with vessels via VHF-FM radio or loudhailer. In addition, members of
the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to inform vessel operators of
this regulation. Official patrol vessels mean any Coast Guard, Coast
Guard Auxiliary, state, or local law enforcement vessels assigned or
approved by the COTP to enforce this section.
    (c) Effective and Enforcement Period. The safety zone in paragraph
(a) of this section is in effect from October 23, 2023, through May 17,
2024, and is subject to enforcement 24 hours a day.
    (d) Regulations. When this safety zone is enforced, the following
regulations, along with those contained in 33 CFR 165.23 apply:
    (1) No person or vessel may enter or remain the safety zone
described in paragraph (a) without the permission of the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative. However, any vessel that is granted
permission to enter or remain in this zone by the COTP or the COTP's
designated representative must proceed through the zone with caution
and operate at a speed no faster than that speed necessary to maintain
a safe course, unless otherwise required by the Navigation Rules.
    (2) Any person or vessel permitted to enter the safety zone shall
comply with the directions and orders of the COTP or the COTP's
designated representative. Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard
vessel by siren, radio, flashing lights, or other means, the operator
of a vessel within the zone shall proceed as directed. Any person or
vessel within the safety zone shall exit the zone when directed by the
COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
    (3) To obtain permission required by this regulation, individuals
may reach the COTP or the COTP's designated representative via Channel
16 (VHF-FM) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (Sector Northern New England Command
Center).
    (e) Penalties. Those who violate this section are subject to the
penalties set forth in 46 U.S.C. 70036.

    Dated: October 2, 2023.
Amy Florentino,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Northern New England.
[FR Doc. 2023-22340 Filed 10-10-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 52104]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20722]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2014-68]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to
improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of
FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the
inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to
affect the legal status of the petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before September 12, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by Docket Number FAA-2014-
0609 using any of the following methods:
     Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to the Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
     Fax: Fax comments to the Docket Management Facility at
202-493-2251.
     Hand Delivery: Bring comments to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Privacy: We will post all comments we receive, without change, to
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. Using the search function of our docket Web site, anyone can
find and read the comments received into any of our dockets, including
the name of the individual sending the comment (or signing the comment
for an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
    Docket: To read background documents or comments received, go to
http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara Fitzgerald, Federal Aviation
Administration, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Standards Staff, ANE-
111, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803-
5229; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 26, 2014.
Lirio Liu,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2014-0609.
    Petitioner: Rolls-Royce plc.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 33.27 (f)(6).
    Description of Relief Sought: Rolls-Royce plc is requesting relief
for the Trent XWB-84, XWB-79B, XWB-79, and XWB-75 engine models to
exclude the entire high-pressure shaft system from consideration when
determining the highest overspeed that would result from a complete
loss of load on a turbine rotor.

[FR Doc. 2014-20722 Filed 8-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P