[Federal Register: July 13, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 132)]
[Notices]
[Page 33431]
[DOCID:fr13jy09-53]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13450-000]

McGinnis, Inc.; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application Accepted
for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Competing
Applications

July 2, 2009.
    On April 29, 2009, McGinnis, Inc. filed an application for a
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act,
proposing to study the feasibility of the John T. Myers Hydrokinetic
Project, located on the Ohio River, in Union County, Kentucky, and
Posey County, Indiana. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if
issued, is to grant the permit holder priority to file a license
application during the permit term. A preliminary permit does not
authorize the permit holder to perform any land disturbing activities
or otherwise enter upon lands or waters owned by others without the
owners' express permission.
    The proposed project would consist of: (1) A 100 to 300-foot-long
by 20 to 52-foot-wide barge spudded down to the riverbed; (2) 10 6-8-
foot-long by 6-8-foot-diameter turbine-generators mounted in line along
the side of the barge; (3) one armored, high-voltage cable transmitting
the generated power to the existing transmission line located adjacent
to the proposed project area; and (4) appurtenant facilities. The
proposed project would generate about 1,533 megawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Bruce D. McGinnis, Sr., McGinnis, Inc., P.O. Box
534, 502 Second St. Ext., South Point, OH 45680, phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Sergiu Serban,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically,
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-
comments.asp.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-13450) in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-16439 Filed 7-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


MEMORANDUM

DATE:		July 9, 2014

TO:		Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR - 2013-0602

FROM:	EPA Region 1

SUBJECT:	July 8, 2014, Meeting with New England State Staff Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY

      A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on July 8, 2014 to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. Discussion covered state goal calculations, applicability, rate to mass conversions and crediting of renewable energy and energy efficiency under a mass-based state program.

ATTENDEES (all by phone)
Connecticut:
Paul Farrell
Wendy Jacobs

Maine:
Eric Kennedy
Jaime Farrin
Marc Cone
John Brodigan
Erle Townsend

Massachusetts:
Seth Federspiel
Alissa Whiteman
Bram Claeys

New Hampshire:
Barbara Hoffman
Joe Fontaine

Rhode Island:
Dena Gonsalves
Doug McVay
Frank Stevenson

Vermont:
Brian Woods
Doug Elliot
Megan O'Toole

NESCAUM:
Paul Miller
Brian Keaveny

EPA:
Shutsu Wong
Cynthia Greene
John Moskal
Debra Dalcher
Elineth Torres
Jackie Ashley
Ravi Srivastava
Brian Fisher
Denise Mulholland
Joe Bryson
Marguerite McLamb
Michael Cohen
Chris Sherry
Janice Godfrey
Juan Santiago
David Solomon
Jim Ketcham-Colwill

Questions from the states are attached.


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4982-4984]
[FR Doc No: 2020-01345]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0572; FRL-10003-00]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Renewal of an
Existing Collection (EPA ICR No. 2517.03 and OMB Control No. 2070-
0194); Comment Request

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), this
document announces that EPA is planning to submit an Information
Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
The ICR, entitled: ``Chemical-Specific Rules under the Toxic Substances
Control Act Section 8(a); Certain Nanoscale Materials'' and identified
by EPA ICR No. 2517.03 and OMB Control No. 2070-0194, represents the
renewal of an

existing ICR that is scheduled to expire on August 31, 2020. Before
submitting the ICR to OMB for review and approval, EPA is soliciting
comments on specific aspects of the proposed information collection
that is summarized in this document. The ICR and accompanying material
are available in the docket for public review and comment.

DATES: Comments must be received March 30, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0572, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: Document Control Office (7407M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    For technical information contact: Jim Alwood, Chemical Control
Division, Mail Code: 7405M, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. What information is EPA particularly interested in?

    Pursuant to PRA section 3506(c)(2)(A) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)),
EPA specifically solicits comments and information to enable it to:
    1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility.
    2. Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimates of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used.
    3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected.
    4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In particular, EPA is requesting comments from
very small businesses (those that employ less than 25) on examples of
specific additional efforts that EPA could make to reduce the paperwork
burden for very small businesses affected by this collection.

II. What information collection activity or ICR does this action apply
to?

    Title: Chemical-Specific Rules under the Toxic Substances Control
Act Section 8(a); Certain Nanoscale Materials.
    ICR number: EPA ICR No. 2517.03.
    OMB control number: OMB Control No. 2070-0194.
    ICR status: This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on 8/31/2020.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), after appearing
in the Federal Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are
displayed either by publication in the Federal Register or by other
appropriate means, such as on the related collection instrument or
form, if applicable. The display of OMB control numbers for certain EPA
regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: This information collection request (ICR) covers
reporting and recordkeeping requirements for persons who manufacture or
process chemical substances as nanoscale materials and is related to a
final rule issued under the authority of section 8(a) of the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA). Although approved as an ICR addendum to
revise an existing approved ICR to incorporate reporting and
recordkeeping requirements in the TSCA section 8(a) rule for Certain
Nanoscale Materials (identified under RIN 2070-AJ54), it was not
incorporated into the existing ICR after its approval. As a result, EPA
is seeking to renew the approval of the addendum and will work to
consolidate the ICRs during the next approval time period.
    TSCA section 8(a) authorizes EPA to promulgate rules that require
persons who manufacture or process chemical substances and mixtures, or
who propose to manufacture or process chemical substances and mixtures,
to maintain such records and submit such reports to EPA as may be
reasonably required. Information that may be collected under TSCA
section 8(a) includes, but is not limited to, chemical names,
categories of use, production volume, byproducts of chemical
production, existing information on health and environmental effects,
exposure information, and disposal information. This information is
collected by the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) and
may be used by other EPA offices and/or Federal agencies to ensure
knowledge of specific practices that may affect human health and the
environment.
    Under TSCA section 8(a), EPA is establishing reporting and
recordkeeping requirements for certain chemical substances as nanoscale
materials. The rule requires that persons who manufacture or process
these nanoscale materials notify EPA of certain information which
includes production volume, methods of manufacture and processing,
exposure and release information, and available health and safety
information. The reporting of these activities will provide EPA with an
opportunity to evaluate the information and consider appropriate action
under TSCA to reduce any risk to human health or the environment. The
information will also inform EPA's assessments of new chemical
nanoscale materials submitted to EPA under TSCA section 5.
    EPA's OPPT, other EPA Offices and/or other Federal agencies will
generally be the primary groups for which information will be
collected. However, to the extent that reported information is not
considered to be confidential business information (CBI), environmental
groups, environmental justice advocates, state and local government
entities and other members of the public will have access to this
information for their own use.
    The ICR, which is available in the docket along with other related
materials, provides a detailed explanation of the collection activities
and the burden estimate that is only briefly summarized here:
    Respondents/affected entities: Entities potentially affected by
this ICR are nanomaterial manufacturers and nanomaterial processors.

    Estimated total number of potential respondents: 285 per year.
    Frequency of response: On occasion.
    Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:
0.78 per year.
    Estimated total annual burden hours: 40,089 hours.
    Estimated total annual costs: $3,067,546. This includes an
estimated burden cost of $3,067,546 and an estimated cost of $0 for
capital investment or maintenance and operational costs.
    Burden statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average
approximately 121 hours per response. Burden is defined in 5 CFR
1320.3(b).

III. Are there changes in the estimates from the last approval?

    There is decrease of 26,861 hours in the total estimated respondent
burden compared with that identified in the ICR currently approved by
OMB. This decrease reflects EPA's expectation of decreased submissions.
In the previous ICR period, the rule required an initial one-time
reporting on current nanomaterials, while the reporting covered in this
period only requires the reporting of new nanomaterials. Furthermore,
burden estimates assume that the same manufacturers will report each
year and, therefore, will have already undertaken rule familiarization
in the previous ICR period. Wage rates were also updated to reflect
2018 dollars. This change is an adjustment in estimates.

IV. What is the next step in the process for this ICR?

    EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. EPA will issue another
Federal Register document pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to
announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to submit
additional comments to OMB. If you have any questions about this ICR or
the approval process, please contact the technical person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Authority:  44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

    Dated: January 17, 2020.
Alexandra Dapolito Dunn,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2020-01345 Filed 1-27-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 19, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 75017-75019]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30628]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2012-1038]
RIN 1625-AA87

Security Zone; On the Waters in Kailua Bay, Oahu, HI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone on
the waters south of Kapoho Point and a nearby channel in Kailua Bay
within the Honolulu Captain of the Port (COTP) Zone. This security zone
is necessary to ensure the safety of the President of the United States
and his family members.

DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m. (HST) on December 17, 2012,
through 10 p.m. (HST) on January 6, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket USCG-2012-1038 are available online by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2012-1038 in the ``Keyword'' box,
and then clicking ``Search''. They are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email Lieutenant Commander Scott O. Whaley,
Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Honolulu;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> (ext. 352), email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If
you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency, for good cause, finds that
those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds good
cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. The details of the President's
intended travel to Hawaii were not made available to the Coast Guard in
sufficient time to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking. Due to the
need for immediate action, the restriction of vessel traffic is
necessary to protect the President and his family members; therefore, a
30-day notice period is impracticable. Delaying the effective date
would be contrary to the security zone's intended objectives of
protecting high-ranking officials, mitigating potential terroristic
acts and enhancing public and maritime safety and security. Publishing
a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and delaying the effective date
would be contrary to the public interest since the occasion would occur
before a notice-and-comment rulemaking could be completed, thereby
jeopardizing the safety of the President of the United States, members
of his family members, and other senior government officials. The COTP
finds that this temporary security zone needs to be effective by
December 17, 2012, to ensure the safety of the President of the United
States and members of his official party visiting the Kailua Bay area
on the eastern coast of Oahu, Hawaii.

Background and Purpose

    From December 17, 2012, through January 6, 2013, the President of
the United States and his family members plan to visit near the Kailua
Bay shoreline on Oahu, Hawaii. This position is located adjacent to
U.S. navigable waters in the Honolulu Captain of the Port Zone. The
Coast Guard is establishing this security zone to ensure the safety of
the President of the United States and his family members.

Discussion of Temporary Final Rule

    This temporary final rule is effective from 6 a.m. HST on December
17, 2012 through 10 p.m. HST on January 6, 2013. The security zone area
is located

within the Honolulu Captain of the Port Zone (See 33 CFR 3.70-10) and
covers all U.S. navigable waters in the Kailua Bay on the west side of
a line connecting Kapoho Point and continuing at a bearing of 240[deg]
(true) to the southwestern corner of Kailuana Loop; as well as the
nearby channel from its entrance at Kapoho Point to a point 150-yards
to the southwest of the N. Kalaheo Avenue Road Bridge. This zone
extends from the surface of the water to the ocean floor. This zone
will include the navigable waters of the channel beginning at point
21[deg]24'56'' N, 157[deg]44'58'' W, then extending to 21[deg]25'26''
N, 157[deg]44'21'' W (Kapoho Point) including all the waters to the
west of a straight line to 21[deg]25'11'' N, 157[deg]43'34'' W
(Kailuana Loop), and then extending back to the original point
21[deg]24'56'' N, 157[deg]44'58'' W.
    Two (2) yellow buoys and a shore-side marker will be placed in
proximity of the security zone along the security zone boundary and one
(1) orange boom will be placed at the channel boundary southwest of the
N. Kalaheo Avenue Road Bridge as visual aids for mariners and the
public to approximate the zone. An illustration of the security zone
will be made available on www.regulations.gov in docket for this
rulemaking, USCG-2012-1038.
    In accordance with the general regulations in 33 CFR part 165,
Subpart D, no person or vessel will be permitted to transit into or
remain in the zone except for authorized support vessels, aircraft and
support personnel, or other vessels authorized by the Captain of the
Port. Any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer, and any
other Captain of the Port representative permitted by law, may enforce
the zone. Vessels, aircraft, or persons in violation of this rule would
be subject to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C.
192.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. The Coast Guard expects the economic
impact of this rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation
under the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
This expectation is based on the limited duration of the zone, the
limited geographic area affected by it, and the lack of commercial
vessel traffic affected by the zone.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule will have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
This rule will affect the following entities, all of which are small
entities: the owners or operators of six jet-ski and para-sailing
companies. These companies will only be affected during the arrival and
departure of the President of the United States through Honolulu
International Airport. Notice to enforce the security zone is not
provided to the Coast Guard more than 12 hours before the President
arrives or departs.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on small entities. This security
zone would not have a significant economic impact on these small
entities for the following reasons: this security zone will be
activated, and thus subject to enforcement, for six hours for the
President's arrival and for six hours for his departure. Once the Coast
Guard is notified of the need to enforce the security zone, all six of
the affected jet-ski and para-sailing companies will be contacted and
made aware of the security zone enforcement. Additionally, marine
advisories will be issued to notify mariners of the enforcement of the
security zone. If you think that your business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this
rule will have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a
comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how
and to what degree this rule will economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking.
    If the rule will affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please contact LCDR Scott O.
Whaley at<PHONE_NUMBER> ext. 352. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this temporary
final rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to

minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a
determination that this action is one of a category of actions which do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction. This regulation establishes one
security zone. A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a
final ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine security, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T14-215 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T14-215  Security Zone; On the Waters in Kailua Bay, Oahu,
HI.

    (a) Location. The following area, within the Honolulu Captain of
the Port Zone (See 33 CFR 3.70-10), from the surface of the water to
the ocean floor is a temporary security zone: All waters in Kailua Bay
to the west of a line beginning at Kapoho Point and thence
southwestward at a bearing of 240[deg] (true) to the shoreline at the
southeastern corner of Kailuana Loop; as well as the nearby channel
from its entrance at Kapoho Point to a point 150-yards to the southwest
of the N. Kalaheo Avenue Road Bridge. This zone extends from the
surface of the water to the ocean floor. This zone will include the
navigable waters of the channel beginning at point 21[deg]24'56'' N,
157[deg]44'58'' W, then extending to 21[deg]25'26'' N, 157[deg]44'21''
W (Kapoho Point) including all the waters to the west of a straight
line to 21[deg]25'11'' N, 157[deg]43'34'' W (Kailuana Loop), and then
extending back to the original point 21[deg]24'56'' N, 157[deg]44'58''
W.
    (b) Effective period. This section is effective from 6 a.m. HST on
December 17, 2012, through 10 p.m. HST on January 6, 2013.
    (c) Regulations. The general regulations governing security zones
contained in 33 CFR 165.33, subpart D, apply to the security zone
created by this temporary final rule.
    (1) All persons are required to comply with the general regulations
governing security zones found in 33 CFR part 165.
    (2) Entry into or remaining in this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Honolulu.
    (3) Persons desiring to transit the security zones identified in
paragraph (a) of this section may contact the Captain of the Port at
Command Center telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER> and<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax
(808) 842-2624 or on VHF channel 16 (156.8 Mhz) to seek permission to
transit the zones. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels
must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Honolulu
or his designated representative and proceed at the minimum speed
necessary to maintain a safe course while within the zone.
    (4) The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the zones by Federal, State, and local agencies.
    (d) Notice of enforcement. The Captain of the Port Honolulu will
cause notice of the enforcement of the security zone described in this
section to be made by verbal broadcasts and written notice to mariners
and the general public.
    (e) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has
been authorized by the Captain of the Port Honolulu to assist in
enforcing the security zones described in paragraph (a) of this
section.

    Dated: November 29, 2012.
J.M. Nunan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2012-30628 Filed 12-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 15, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 39103]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14123]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2010-0058]

Canadian Pacific Railway's Request for Positive Train Control
Safety Plan Approval and System Certification

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides the public with notice that Canadian
Pacific Railway (CP) submitted to FRA its Positive Train Control Safety
Plan (PTCSP) Version 1.0, dated May 9, 2016, on FRA's Secure
Information Repository (SIR) site on May 11, 2016. CP asks FRA to
approve its PTCSP and issue a Positive Train Control System
Certification for CP's Interoperable Electronic Train Management System
(I-ETMS), under 49 CFR part 236.

DATES: FRA will consider communications received by July 15, 2016
before taking final action on the PTCSP. FRA may consider comments
received after that date if practicable.

ADDRESSES: All communications concerning this proceeding should
identify Docket Number 2010-0058 and may be submitted by any of the
following methods:
     Web site: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mark Hartong, Senior Scientific
Technical Advisor, at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Mr.
David Blackmore, Staff Director, Positive Train Control Division, at
(312) 835-3903, or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In its PTCSP, CP asserts that it designed
its I-ETMS as a vital overlay PTC system as defined in 49 CFR
236.1015(e)(2). The PTCSP describes CP's I-ETMS implementation and the
associated I-ETMS safety processes, safety analyses, and test,
validation, and verification processes used during the development of
I-ETMS. The PTCSP also contains CP's operational and support
requirements and procedures.
    CP's PTCSP and the accompanying request for approval and system
certification are available for review online at www.regulations.gov
(Docket Number FRA-2010-0058) and in person at DOT's Docket Operations
Facility, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
The Docket Operations Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
    Interested parties are invited to comment on the PTCSP by
submitting written comments or data. During its review of the PTCSP,
FRA will consider any comments or data submitted. However, FRA may
elect not to respond to any particular comment and, under 49 CFR
236.1009(d)(3), FRA maintains the authority to approve or disapprove
the PTCSP at its sole discretion. FRA does not anticipate scheduling a
public hearing regarding CP's PTCSP because the circumstances do not
appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party desires an
opportunity for oral comment, the party should notify FRA in writing
before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for his or
her request.

Privacy Act Notice

    Anyone can search the electronic form of any written communications
and comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
Under 49 CFR 211.3, FRA solicits comments from the public to better
inform its decisions. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including
any personal information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/
ALL-14 FDMS), which you can review at www.dot.gov/privacy. See http://www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice for the privacy notice of
regulations.gov.

Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety, Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-14123 Filed 6-14-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3458-3459]
[FR Doc No: 2018-01338]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-512, OMB Control No. 3235-0570]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copy Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Form N-CSR.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (``OMB'') a request for extension of the
previously approved collection of information discussed below.
    Form N-CSR (17 CFR 249.331 and 274.128) is a combined reporting
form used by registered management investment companies (``funds'') to
file certified shareholder reports under the Investment Company Act of
1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.) (``Investment Company Act'') and the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (``Exchange
Act''). Specifically, Form N-CSR is to be used for reports under
section 30(b)(2) of the Investment Company Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-29(b)(2))
and section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) and
78o(d)), filed pursuant to rule 30b2-1(a) under the Investment Company
Act (17 CFR 270.30b2-1(a)). Reports on Form N-CSR are to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') no later than
10 days after the transmission to stockholders of any report that is
required to be transmitted to stockholders under rule 30e-1 under the
Investment Company Act (17 CFR 270.30e-1). The information filed with
the Commission permits the verification of compliance with securities
law requirements and assures the public availability and dissemination
of the information.
    The following estimates of average burden hours and costs are made
solely for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 \1\ and are
not derived from a comprehensive or even representative survey or study
of the cost of Commission rules and forms. Compliance with Form N-CSR
is mandatory. Responses to the collection of information will not be
kept confidential.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The current total annual burden hour inventory for Form N-CSR is
172,899 hours.\2\ The hour burden estimates for preparing and filing
reports on Form N-CSR are based on the Commission's experience with the
contents of the form. The number of burden hours may vary depending on,
among other things, the complexity of the filing and whether
preparation of the reports is performed by internal staff or outside
counsel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ This estimate is based on the following calculations:
172,899 hours = (11,856 management investment companies x 14.52 hour
burden per fund per year) + 750 additional hours for closed-end
funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission's new estimate of burden hours that will be imposed
by Form N-CSR is as follows:

                  Hour Burden for Reports on Form N-CSR
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of funds............................................   \3\ 11,856
Number of filings per fund per year........................            2
Hour burden per fund per filing............................         7.31
Hour burden per fund per year (7.31 hours per filing x 2           14.62
 filings per year).........................................
Additional aggregate annual burden for closed-end funds....      \4\ 750
                                                            ------------
    Total annual hour burden...............................  \5\ 174,085
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In total, the Commission estimates it will take 174,085 burden
hours per year for all funds to prepare and file reports on Form N-CSR.
Based on the Commission's estimate of 174,085 burden hours and an
estimated wage rate of approximately $324 per hour,\6\ the total
internal annual cost to registrants of the hour burden for complying
with Form N-CSR requirements is approximately $56 million.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: 11,856
management investment companies = (1,594 exchange-traded funds -
eight organized as unit investment trusts + 750 closed-end funds +
481 money market funds + 9,039 other mutual funds).
    \4\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: 750
hours = (750 closed-end funds x 1 hour per closed-end fund).
    \5\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: 174,085
hours = 750 hours + (11,856 funds x 14.62 burden hours per fund per
year).
    \6\ The Commission's estimate concerning the wage rate is based
on salary information for the securities industry compiled by the
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association. The estimated
wage figure is based on published rates for compliance attorneys and
senior programmers, modified to account for an 1,800-hour work year
and inflation; multiplied by 5.35 to account for bonuses, firm size,
employee benefits, and overhead; and adjusted to account for the
effects of inflation, yielding effective hourly rates of $340 and
$308, respectively. See Securities Industry and Financial Markets
Association, Report on Management & Professional Earnings in the
Securities Industry 2013. We estimate that compliance attorneys and
senior programmers would divide their time equally, yielding an
estimated hourly wage rate of $324. ($340 per hour for compliance
attorneys + $308 per hour for senior programmers) / 2 = $324 per
hour.
    \7\ 174,085 hours x $324 per hour = $56,403,540 per year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimates of average burden hours and costs are made solely for the
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, and are not derived from a
comprehensive or even representative survey or study of the costs of
Commission rules and forms. Compliance with the collection of
information requirements of Form N-CSR is mandatory. Responses to the
collection of information will not be kept confidential. An agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this
information collection at the following website, www.reginfo.gov.
Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to:
[email protected]; and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email
to: [email protected]. Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30
days of this notice.

    Dated: January 19, 2018.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-01338 Filed 1-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: June 23, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 119)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 29592-29593]
[DOCID:fr23jn09-3]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30673; Amdt. No. 3327]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective June 23, 2009. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of June 23, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matter incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For Examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_
federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability_All SIAPs are available online free of charge. Visit
nfdc.faa.gov to register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP copies may be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harry J. Hodges, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS-420) Flight Technologies and Programs Division,
Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) by amending the referenced SIAPs.
The complete regulatory description of each SIAP is listed on the
appropriate FAA Form 8260, as modified by the National Flight Data
Center (FDC)/Permanent Notice to Airmen (P-NOTAM), and is incorporated
by reference in the amendment under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and
Sec.  97.20 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    The large number of SIAPs, their complex nature, and the need for a
special format make their verbatim publication in the Federal Register
expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use the regulatory
text of the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic depiction on charts
printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. Thus, the advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP contained in FAA form documents is
unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR sections and
specifies the types of SIAP and the corresponding effective dates. This
amendment also identifies the airport and its location, the procedure
and the amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP as amended in the transmittal. For safety and
timeliness of change considerations, this amendment

incorporates only specific changes contained for each SIAP as modified
by FDC/P-NOTAMs.
    The SIAPs, as modified by FDC P-NOTAM, and contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these changes to
SIAPs, the TERPS criteria were applied only to specific conditions
existing at the affected airports. All SIAP amendments in this rule
have been previously issued by the FAA in a FDC NOTAM as an emergency
action of immediate flight safety relating directly to published
aeronautical charts. The circumstances which created the need for all
these SIAP amendments requires making them effective in less than 30
days.
    Because of the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs
and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and public procedure
before adopting these SIAPs are impracticable and contrary to the
public interest and, where applicable, that good cause exists for
making these SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore- (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air traffic control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 12, 2009.
John M. Allen,
Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14, Code
of Federal regulations, Part 97, 14 CFR part 97, is amended by amending
Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, effective at 0901 UTC on the
dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:
    By amending: Sec.  97.23 VOR, VOR/DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME or
TACAN; Sec.  97.25 LOC, LOC/DME, LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME; Sec.
97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; Sec.  97.29 ILS, ILS/DME, MLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV;
Sec.  97.31 RADAR SIAPs; Sec.  97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and Sec.  97.35 COPTER
SIAPs, Identified as follows:

* * * Effective Upon Publication

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        FDC date               State                 City                   Airport           FDC No.                        Subject
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
06/02/09...............  MI                 FREMONT...............  FREMONT MUNI..........       9/1459  RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, AMDT 1A.
06/02/09...............  MI                 FREMONT...............  FREMONT MUNI..........       9/1460  RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, AMDT 1A.
06/02/09...............  MI                 MENOMINEE.............  MENOMINEE-MARINETTE          9/1466  ILS RWY 3, AMDT 2A.
                                                                     TWIN COUNTY.
06/02/09...............  MI                 MENOMINEE.............  MENOMINEE-MARINETTE          9/1467  RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, ORIG-A.
                                                                     TWIN COUNTY.
06/10/09...............  CA                 MERCED................  MERCED RGNL/MACREADY         9/2794  ILS OR LOC RWY 30, AMDT 14C.
                                                                     FIELD.
06/10/09...............  CA                 MERCED................  MERCED RGNL/MACREADY         9/2795  LOC BC RWY 12, AMDT 10D.
                                                                     FIELD.
06/10/09...............  CA                 MERCED................  MERCED RGNL/MACREADY         9/2796  GPS RWY 12, ORIG-C.
                                                                     FIELD.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. E9-14555 Filed 6-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 31, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 34876]
[FR Doc No: 2023-11512]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4667-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

Alaska; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Alaska (FEMA-4667-DR), dated August 26, 2022, and
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on April 5, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Lance E. Davis,
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for
this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Yolanda J. Jackson as
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2023-11512 Filed 5-30-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P