ENCLOSURE 1

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

STATE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

REGULATIONS FOR THE CONTROL AND ABATEMENT OF AIR POLLUTION

PROVISIONS AFFECTED

REVISION E04

CONCERNING

CASE-BY-CASE RACT DETERMINATIONS

(9 VAC 5 CHAPTER 40)

Adoption Date:  September 25, 2006

Effective Date:  December 15, 2006

The following table lists the specific provisions of the attached
regulations that will be used to implement the State Implementation Plan
(SIP).  Highlighted provisions are included for information purposes
only and are not to be construed as part of the Commonwealth's SIP, nor
are any provisions directly related to the highlighted provisions to be
considered as part of the SIP.  A copy of the actual regulation
submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the Virginia
SIP is included in Enclosure 2; details concerning the specific
provisions that are not to be included in the Virginia SIP are noted in
this copy.

CHAPTER 40	EXISTING STATIONARY SOURCES

PART II		Emission Standards

ARTICLE 4		GENERAL PROCESS OPERATIONS (Rule 4-4)

9 VAC 5-40-240	Applicability and designation of affected facility

9 VAC 5-40-250	Definitions (modified)

9 VAC 5-40-260	Standard for particulate matter (AQCR 1-6)

9 VAC 5-40-270	Standard for particulate matter (AQCR 7)

9 VAC 5-40-280	Standard for sulfur dioxide

9 VAC 5-40-290	Standard for hydrogen sulfide

9 VAC 5-40-300	Standard for volatile organic compounds (repealed)

9 VAC 5-40-310	Standard for nitrogen oxides (repealed)

9 VAC 5-40-311	Reasonably available control technology guidelines for
stationary sources of nitrogen oxides (repealed)

9 VAC 5-40-320	Standard for visible emissions

9 VAC 5-40-330	Standard for fugitive dust/emissions

9 VAC 5-40-340	Standard for odor

9 VAC 5-40-350	Standard for toxic pollutants

9 VAC 5-40-360	Compliance

9 VAC 5-40-370	Test methods and procedures

9 VAC 5-40-380	Monitoring

9 VAC 5-40-390	Notification, records and reporting

9 VAC 5-40-400	Registration

9 VAC 5-40-410	Facility and control equipment maintenance or malfunction

9 VAC 5-40-420	Permits

ARTICLE 51		Stationary Sources Subject to Case-by-Case Control
Technology Determinations (Rule 4-51)

9 VAC 5-40-7370	Applicability and designation of affected facility
(added)

9 VAC 5-40-7380	Definitions (added)

9 VAC 5-40-7390	Standard for volatile organic compounds (1-hour ozone
standard) (added)

9 VAC 5-40-7400	Standard for volatile organic compounds (8-hour ozone
standard) (added)

9 VAC 5-40-7410	Standard for nitrogen oxides (1-hour ozone standard)
(added)

			Subsection F

9 VAC 5-40-7420	Standard for nitrogen oxides (8-hour ozone standard)
(added)

9 VAC 5-40-7430	Presumptive reasonably available control technology
guidelines for stationary sources of nitrogen oxides (added)

9 VAC 5-40-7440	Standard for visible emissions (added)

9 VAC 5-40-7450	Standard for fugitive dust/emissions (added)

9 VAC 5-40-7460	Standard for odor (added)

9 VAC 5-40-7470	Standard for toxic pollutants (added)

9 VAC 5-40-7480	Compliance (added)

9 VAC 5-40-7490	Test methods and procedures (added)

9 VAC 5-40-7500	Monitoring (added)

9 VAC 5-40-7510	Notification, records and reporting (added)

9 VAC 5-40-7520	Registration (added)

9 VAC 5-40-7530	Facility and control equipment maintenance or
malfunction (added)

9 VAC 5-40-7540	Permits (added)

TEMPLATES\SIP-REG\REG01

SIP\NONATTN PLANS\2008\E04-SIP-1.DOC


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

Issued by the Department of Transportation on September 26, 2003

   NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2001-10385

________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Application of Continental Airlines, Inc. filed 8/27/03 for:

XX  Renewal of exemption for two years under 49 U.S.C. 40109 to provide
the following service:

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail
between New York/Newark and Malaga and Palma de Mallorca, Spain, via
Madrid.  Continental also seeks renewal of its authority to integrate
this authority with its other exemption and certificate authority.
Continental states that it intends to use this authority in connection
with its code share with Air Europa.

Applicant rep:  R. Bruce Keiner<PHONE_NUMBER>  DOT Analyst:  Linda
Senese<PHONE_NUMBER>

D I S P O S I T I O N

XX  Granted (subject to conditions, see below)

The above action was effective when taken:  September 26, 2003, through
September 26, 2005.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		    Office of International Aviation

XX  The authority granted is consistent with the aviation agreement
between the United States and Spain.

Except to the extent exempted or waived, this authority is subject to
the terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:  XX Holder’s
certificates of public convenience and necessity

	  XX  Standard exemption conditions (attached)

	  XX  Statement of authorization approving Continental/Air Europa
code-share operations

	          dated November 6, 2001, and conditions therein

Conditions:  The route integration authority granted is subject to the
condition that any service provided under this exemption shall be
consistent with all applicable agreements between the United States and
the foreign countries involved.  Furthermore, (a) nothing in the award
of the route integration authority requested should be construed as
conferring upon Continental rights (including fifth-freedom intermediate
and/or beyond rights) to serve markets where U.S. carrier entry is
limited unless Continental notifies the Department of its intent to
serve such a market and unless and until the Department has completed
any necessary carrier selection procedures to determine which carrier(s)
should be authorized to exercise such rights; and (b) should there be a
request by any carrier to use the limited-entry route rights that are
included in Continental’s authority by virtue of the route integration
exemption granted here, but that are not then

(See Reverse Side)

2

being used by Continental, the holding of such authority by route
integration will not be considered as providing any preference for
Continental in a competitive carrier selection proceeding to determine
which carrier(s) should be entitled to use the authority at issue.

________________________________________________________________________
______________

On the basis of data officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the
Department's regulations, we found the applicant qualified to provide
the services authorized.

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that

(1) our action was consistent with Department policy; (2) grant of the
exemption authority was consistent with the public interest; and (3)
grant of the authority would not constitute a major regulatory action
under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.  To the extent not
granted, we denied all requests in the referenced Docket.  We may amend,
modify, or revoke the authority granted in this Notice at any time
without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

			Attachment

U.S. Carrier Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the U.S. carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Hold at all times effective operating authority from the government
of each country served;

(2)  Comply with applicable requirements concerning oversales contained
in 14 CFR 250 (for scheduled operations, if authorized);

(3)  Comply with the requirements for reporting data contained in 14 CFR
241;

(4)  Comply with requirements for minimum insurance coverage, and for
certifying that coverage to the Department, contained in 14 CFR 205;

(5)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 203, concerning
waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(6)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security.  To assure compliance with all applicable U.S.
Government requirements concerning security, the holder shall, before
commencing any new service (including charter flights) to or from a
foreign airport, contact its Principal Security Inspector (PSI) to
advise the PSI of its plans and to find out whether the Transportation
Security Administration has determined that security is adequate to
allow such airport(s) to be served; and

(7)  Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department of Transportation, with all applicable orders and regulations
of other U.S. agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the
United States.

The authority granted shall be effective only during the period when the
holder is in compliance with the conditions imposed above.

										08/2003


[Federal Register: September 5, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 173)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 51727-51732]
[DOCID:fr05se08-7]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0549; FRL-8378-2]

Chlorantraniliprole; Pesticide Tolerances for Emergency
Exemptions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes time-limited tolerances for
residues of chlorantraniliprole in or on various sweet corn commodities
and in milk. This action is in response to EPA's granting of emergency
exemptions under section 18 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) authorizing use of the pesticide on sweet corn.
This regulation establishes maximum permissible levels for residues of
chlorantraniliprole in or on these food commodities. The time-limited
tolerances expire and are revoked on December 31, 2011.

DATES: This regulation is effective September 5, 2008. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before November 4, 2008,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0549. To access the
electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, select ``Advanced
Search,'' then ``Docket Search.'' Insert the docket ID number where
indicated and select the ``Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on
the regulations.gov website to view the docket index or access
available documents. All documents in the docket are listed in the
docket index available in regulations.gov. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket at http://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the Office
of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marcel Howard, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or

pesticide manufacturer. Potentially affected entities may include, but
are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

 B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?

    In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal
Register document through the electronic docket at http://
www.regulations.gov, you may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a
frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the
Government Printing Office's pilot e-CFR site at http://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.

C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?

    Under section 408(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), as amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA),
any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and
may also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural
regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for
hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. You must file your objection or
request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by
EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0549 in the
subject line on the first page of your submission. All requests must be
in writing, and must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or
before November 4, 2008.
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0549, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

    EPA, on its own initiative, in accordance with sections 408(e) and
408(l)(6) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a(e) and 346a(1)(6), is establishing
time-limited tolerances for residues of the insecticide
chlorantraniliprole, 3-bromo-N-[4-chloro-2-methyl-6-
[(methylamino)carbonyl]phenyl]-1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-1H-pyrazole-5-
carboxamide), in or on corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed
at 0.01 parts per million (ppm); corn, sweet, forage at 6.0 ppm; corn,
sweet, stover at 6.0 ppm; corn, sweet, cannery waste at 6.0 ppm; and
milk at 0.03 ppm. These time-limited tolerances expire and are revoked
on December 31, 2011. EPA will publish a document in the Federal
Register to remove the revoked tolerances from the CFR.
    Section 408(l)(6) of FFDCA requires EPA to establish a time-limited
tolerance or exemption from the requirement for a tolerance for
pesticide chemical residues in food that will result from the use of a
pesticide under an emergency exemption granted by EPA under section 18
of FIFRA. Such tolerances can be established without providing notice
or period for public comment. EPA does not intend for its actions on
section 18 related time-limited tolerances to set binding precedents
for the application of section 408 of FFDCA and the new safety standard
to other tolerances and exemptions. Section 408(e) of FFDCA allows EPA
to establish a tolerance or an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance on its own initiative, i.e., without having received any
petition from an outside party.
    Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
    Section 18 of FIFRA authorizes EPA to exempt any Federal or State
agency from any provision of FIFRA, if EPA determines that ``emergency
conditions exist which require such exemption.'' EPA has established
regulations governing such emergency exemptions in 40 CFR part 166.

III. Emergency Exemption for Chlorantraniliprole on Sweet Corn and
FFDCA Tolerances

    The states of Illinois and Minnesota requested the use of
chlorantraniliprole, formulated as the product Coragen (EPA Reg. No.
352-729), on sweet corn to control corn earworms. According to these
states, the available registered alternatives were not providing
adequate control of this pest and without the use of Coragen, growers
would suffer significant economic losses. After having reviewed the
submission, EPA determined that emergency conditions exist for these
States, and that the criteria for an emergency exemption are met. EPA
has authorized under FIFRA section 18 the use of chlorantraniliprole on
sweet corn for control of corn earworm in Illinois and Minnesota.
    As part of its evaluation of the emergency exemption applications,
EPA assessed the potential risks presented by residues of
chlorantraniliprole in or on sweet corn and various associated sweet
corn-related commodities. In doing so, EPA considered the safety
standard in section 408(b)(2) of FFDCA, and EPA

decided that the necessary tolerances under section 408(l)(6) of FFDCA
would be consistent with the safety standard and with FIFRA section 18.
Consistent with the need to move quickly on the emergency exemption in
order to address an urgent non-routine situation and to ensure that the
resulting food is safe and lawful, EPA is issuing these tolerances
without notice and opportunity for public comment as provided in
section 408(l)(6) of FFDCA. Although these time-limited tolerances
expire and are revoked on December 31, 2011, under section 408(l)(5) of
FFDCA, residues of the pesticide not in excess of the amounts specified
in the tolerance remaining in or on these commodities after that date
will not be unlawful, provided the pesticide was applied in a manner
that was lawful under FIFRA, and the residues do not exceed a level
that was authorized by these time-limited tolerances at the time of
that application. EPA will take action to revoke these time-limited
tolerances earlier if any experience with, scientific data on, or other
relevant information on this pesticide indicate that the residues are
not safe.
    Because these time-limited tolerances are being approved under
emergency conditions, EPA has not made any decisions about whether
chlorantraniliprole meets FIFRA's registration requirements for use on
sweet corn or whether permanent tolerances for this use would be
appropriate. Under these circumstances, EPA does not believe that these
time-limited tolerance decisions serve as a basis for registration of
chlorantraniliprole by a State for special local needs under FIFRA
section 24(c). Nor do these tolerances serve as the basis for persons
in any State other than Illinois and Minnesota to use this pesticide on
this crop under FIFRA section 18 absent the issuance of an emergency
exemption applicable within that State. For additional information
regarding the emergency exemption for chlorantraniliprole, contact the
Agency's Registration Division at the address provided under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

    Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
    Consistent with the factors specified in section 408(b)(2)(D) of
FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and other
relevant information in support of this action. EPA has sufficient data
to assess the hazards of and to make a determination on aggregate
exposure expected as a result of these emergency exemption requests and
the time-limited tolerances for residues of chlorantraniliprole on
corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed at 0.01 ppm; corn,
sweet, forage at 6.0 ppm; corn, sweet, stover at 6.0 ppm; corn, sweet,
cannery waste at 6.0 ppm; and milk at 0.03 ppm. EPA's assessment of
exposures and risks associated with establishing these time-limited
tolerances follows.

A. Toxicological Endpoints

    For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no
appreciable risk, a toxicological point of departure (POD) is
identified as the basis for derivation of reference values for risk
assessment. The POD may be defined as the highest dose at which no
adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL) in the toxicology study
identified as appropriate for use in risk assessment. However, if a
NOAEL cannot be determined, the lowest dose at which adverse effects of
concern are identified (the LOAEL) or a Benchmark Dose (BMD) approach
is sometimes used for risk assessment. Uncertainty/safety factors (UFs)
are used in conjunction with the POD to take into account uncertainties
inherent in the extrapolation from laboratory animal data to humans and
in the variations in sensitivity among members of the human population
as well as other unknowns. Safety is assessed for acute and chronic
dietary risks by comparing aggregate food and water exposure to the
pesticide to the acute population adjusted dose (aPAD) and chronic
population adjusted dose (cPAD). The aPAD and cPAD are calculated by
dividing the POD by all applicable UFs. Aggregate short-, intermediate-
, and chronic-term risks are evaluated by comparing food, water, and
residential exposure to the POD to ensure that the margin of exposure
(MOE) called for by the product of all applicable UFs is not exceeded.
This latter value is referred to as the Level of Concern (LOC).
    For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes that any amount of
exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the Agency estimates
risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of the adverse effect
greater than that expected in a lifetime. For more information on the
general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete
description of the risk assessment process, see http://www.epa.gov/
pesticides/factsheets/riskassess.htm.
    A summary of the toxicological endpoints for chlorantraniliprole
used for human risk assessment can be found at http://
www.regulations.gov in document Chlorantraniliprole (DPX-E2Y45): Human
Health Risk Assessment for Proposed Uses on Pome fruit, Stone fruit,
Leafy vegetables, Brassica leafy vegetables, Cucurbit vegetables,
Fruiting vegetables, Cotton, Grapes, Potatoes, Rice, Turf and
Ornamentals, pages 22-24 in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0275.

B. Exposure Assessment

    1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary
exposure to chlorantraniliprole, EPA considered exposure under the
time-limited tolerance established by this action as well as all
existing chlorantraniliprole tolerances in (40 CFR 180.628). EPA
assessed dietary exposures from chlorantraniliprole in food as follows:
    i. Acute exposure. No acute effects were identified in the dietary
toxicological studies for chlorantraniliprole; therefore, a
quantitative acute dietary exposure assessment is unnecessary.
    ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting the chronic dietary exposure
assessment EPA used the food consumption data from the USDA 1994-1996
and 1998 CSFII. EPA's chronic dietary exposure estimates for
chlorantriliprole are based on tolerance level residues, assuming 100%
crops associated with the existing uses and section 18 requests are
treated, and included the highest modeled estimated drinking water
concentration relevant to the scenario.
    iii. Cancer. Chlorantraniliprole is classified as ``Not likely to
be Carcinogenic to Humans,'' and therefore a cancer exposure assessment
is unnecessary.
    iv. Anticipated residue and percent crop treated (PCT) information.
EPA did not use anticipated residue and/or PCT

information in the dietary assessment for chlorantraniliprole.
Tolerance level residues and/or 100 PCT were assumed for all food
commodities.
    2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency used screening
level water exposure models in the dietary exposure analysis and risk
assessment for chlorantraniliprole in drinking water. These simulation
models take into account data on the physical, chemical, and fate/
transport characteristics of chlorantraniliprole. Further information
regarding EPA drinking water models used in pesticide exposure
assessment can be found at http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/
index.htm.
    Based on the Pesticide Root Zone Model/Exposure Analysis Modeling
System (PRZM/EXAMS) and Screening Concentration in Ground Water (SCI-
GROW) models, the estimated drinking water concentrations (EDWCs) of
chlorantraniliprole for chronic exposures for non-cancer assessments
are estimated to be 3.65 parts per billion (PPB) for surface water and
1.06 ppb for ground water.
    Modeled estimates of drinking water concentrations were directly
entered into the dietary exposure model. For chronic dietary risk
assessment, the water concentration of value 3.65 ppb was used to
assess the contribution to drinking water.
    3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control,
termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets).
    Chlorantraniliprole is currently registered for the following uses
that could result in residential exposures: Turfgrass and ornamental
plants. EPA assessed residential exposure using the following
assumptions: Inhalation exposure is not expected due to low vapor
pressure; dermal postapplication exposure is possible for adults and
children for short- and intermediate-term durations, and exposure from
incidental oral ingestion is possible for children.
    However, due to the lack of toxicity via the dermal route, as well
as the lack of toxicity over the acute, short- and intermediate- term
via the oral route, no risk is expected from these exposures.
    4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
    EPA has not made a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to
chlorantraniliprole and any other substances, and chlorantraniliprole
does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other
substances. For the purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA
has not assumed that chlorantraniliprole has a common mechanism of
toxicity with other substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts
to determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to
evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see the policy
statements released by EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs concerning
common mechanism determinations and procedures for cumulating effects
from substances found to have a common mechanism on EPA's website at
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.

C. Safety Factor for Infants and Children

    1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA
shall apply an additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants
and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal
and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity
and exposure unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a
different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. This
additional margin of safety is commonly referred to as the FQPA safety
factor (SF). In applying this provision, EPA either retains the default
value of 10X, or uses a different additional SF when reliable data
available to EPA support the choice of a different factor.
    2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity. Chlorantraniliprole did not
result in developmental toxicity in either rats or rabbits or in
reproductive effects in the multi-generation reproduction study. There
was no indication of increased offspring susceptibility in these
studies.
    3. Conclusion. EPA has determined that reliable data show that the
safety of infants and children would be adequately protected if the
FQPA SF were reduced to 1X. That decision is based on the following
findings:
    i. The toxicity database for chlorantraniliprole is complete.
    ii. There is no indication that chlorantraniliprole is a neurotoxic
chemical and there is no need for a developmental neurotoxicity study
or additional UFs to account for neurotoxicity.
    iii. There is no evidence that chlorantraniliprole results in
increased susceptibility in in utero rats or rabbits in the prenatal
developmental studies or in young rats in the 2-generation reproduction
study.
    iv. There are no residual uncertainties identified in the exposure
databases. The dietary food exposure assessments were performed based
on 100 PCT and tolerance-level residues. EPA made conservative
(protective) assumptions in the ground and surface water modeling used
to assess exposure to chlorantraniliprole in drinking water. EPA used
similarly conservative assumptions to assess postapplication exposure
of children as well as incidental oral exposure of toddlers. These
assessments will not underestimate the exposure and risks posed by
chlorantraniliprole.

D. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety

    EPA determines whether acute and chronic pesticide exposures are
safe by comparing aggregate exposure estimates to the aPAD and cPAD.
The aPAD and cPAD represent the highest safe exposures, taking into
account all appropriate SFs. EPA calculates the aPAD and cPAD by
dividing the POD by all applicable UFs. For linear cancer risks, EPA
calculates the probability of additional cancer cases given the
estimated aggregate exposure. Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term
risks are evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water,
and residential exposure to the POD to ensure that the MOE called for
by the product of all applicable UFs is not exceeded.
    1. Acute risk. An acute aggregate risk assessment takes into
account exposure estimates from acute dietary consumption of food and
drinking water. No adverse effect resulting from a single-oral exposure
was identified, therefore, chlorantraniliprole is not expected to pose
an acute risk.
    2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described in this
unit for chronic exposure, EPA has concluded that chronic exposure to
chlorantraniliprole from food and water will utilize 1% of the cPAD for
(children 1-2 years old) the population group receiving the greatest
exposure.
    3. Short-term risk. Short-term aggregate exposure takes into
account short-term residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food
and water (considered to be a background exposure level).
    Although short-term residential exposure could occur with the use
of chlorantraniliprole, no toxicological effects resulting from short-
term dosing were observed. Therefore, the aggregate

short-term risk is the sum of the risk from food and water and will not
be greater than the chronic aggregate risk.
    4. Intermediate-term risk. Intermediate-term aggregate exposure
takes into account intermediate-term non-dietary, non-occupational
exposure plus chronic exposure to food and water (considered to be a
background exposure level).
    Although intermediate-term residential exposure could result from
the use of chlorantraniliprole, no toxicological effects resulting from
intermediate-term dosing were observed. Therefore, the aggregate
intermediate-term risk is the sum of the risk from food and water and
will not be greater than the chronic aggregate risk.
    5. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. population. Chlorantraniliprole
is classified as ``Not likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans'' and is
therefore not expect to pose a cancer risk.
    6. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
to the general population, or to infants and children, from aggregate
exposure to chlorantraniliprole residues.

V. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    Adequate enforcement methodology (LC/MS/MS) is available to enforce
the tolerance expression. The method may be requested from: Chief,
Analytical Chemistry Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes
Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755-5350; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
B. International Residue Limits

    There are no CODEX residue limits for residues of
chlorantraniliprole on sweet corn commodities or in milk.

VI. Conclusion

    Therefore, time-limited tolerances are established for residues of
chlorantraniliprole, 3-bromo-N-[4-chloro-2-methyl-6-
[(methylamino)carbonyl]phenyl]-1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-1H-pyrazole-5-
carboxamide), in or on corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed
at 0.01 ppm; corn, sweet, forage at 6.0 ppm; corn, sweet, stover at 6.0
ppm; corn, sweet, cannery waste at 6.0 ppm; and milk at 0.03 ppm. These
tolerances expire and are revoked on December 31, 2011.

VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This final rule establishes tolerances under sections 408(e) and
408(l)(6) of FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of
actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this final
rule has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this
final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established in accordance
with sections 408(e) and 408(l)(6) of FFDCA, such as the tolerances in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
    This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this final rule. In addition,
this final rule does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104-4).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note).

VIII. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to
the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal
Register. This final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: August 22, 2008.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

0
2. Section 180.628 is amended by alphabetically adding commodities to
the table in paragraph (b) to read as follows:

Sec.  180.628  Chlorantraniliprole; tolerances for residues.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Expiration/
                   Commodity                     Parts per   revocation
                                                  million       date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corn, sweet, cannery waste....................         6.0      12/31/11
Corn, sweet, forage...........................         6.0      12/31/11

Corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks               0.01      12/31/11
 removed......................................
Corn, sweet, stover...........................         6.0      12/31/11
Milk..........................................        0.03      12/31/11
                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-20520 Filed 9-5-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register: April 20, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 76)]
[Notices]
[Page 19917]
[DOCID:fr20ap07-51]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP02-361-063]

Gulfstream Natural Gas System, L.L.C.; Notice of Negotiated Rate

April 13, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 11, 2007, Gulfstream Natural Gas System,
L.L.C. (Gulfstream) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff,
Original Volume No. 1, Original Sheet No. 8.02c, to become effective
May 1, 2007.
    Gulfstream states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all
affected customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-7570 Filed 4-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 47 (Monday, March 11, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8605-8607]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04312]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0118; Product Identifier 2018-NM-143-AD; Amendment
39-19582; AD 2019-03-30]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(Embraer) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer) Model EMB-135ER, -
135KE, -135KL, and -135LR airplanes and Model EMB-145, -145ER, -145MR,
-145LR, -145XR, -145MP, and -145EP airplanes. This AD was prompted by
reports of internal corrosion of the stow/transit switches installed in
the engine thrust reversers. This AD requires installation of new stow/
transit switches. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective March 26, 2019.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of March 26,
2019.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain other publication listed in this AD as of August
3, 2004 (69 FR 38819, June 29, 2004).
    We must receive comments on this AD by April 25, 2019.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this final rule, contact
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer), Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170--Putim--
12227-901 S[atilde]o Jose dos Campos--SP--Brasil; telephone +55 12
3927-5852 or +55 12 3309-0732; fax +55 12 3927-7546; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet http://www.flyembraer.com. You may
view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It
is also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0118.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0118; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace
Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC),
which is the aviation authority for Brazil, has issued Brazilian AD
2001-05-03R3, dated April 22, 2003 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for all Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica
S.A. (Embraer) Model EMB-135 airplanes and Model EMB-145, 145ER, -
145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -145MP, and 145EP airplanes. The MCAI states:

    There have been found cases of internal corrosion of the stow/
transit switches installed in the engine thrust reversers of EMB-145
( ) aircraft models. One case of severely contaminated transit
switch resulted in uncommanded engine rollback to idle in flight.
Spurious messages ``ENG ( ) REV DISAGREE'' have also been displayed
in the [Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting System] EICAS, due to
the above internal corrosion, which have induced aborted takeoffs.
    Since this condition may occur in other airplanes of the same
type and affects flight safety, a corrective action [installation of
stow/transit switches] is required. Thus, sufficient reason exists
to request compliance with this [Brazilian] AD in the indicated time
limit.

    You may examine the MCAI on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0118.

Relationship Between This AD and AD 2004-13-16, Amendment 39-13698 (69
FR 38819, June 29, 2004) (``AD 2004-13-16'')

    We issued AD 2004-13-16 to correspond to the MCAI. However, AD
2004-13-16 referenced Embraer Service Bulletin 145-78-0035, Revision
02, dated January 31, 2003, which has been revised to include
additional airplanes. We have determined that not all affected
airplanes were listed in Embraer Service Bulletin 145-78-0035, Revision
02, dated January 31, 2003.
    This final rule does not supersede AD 2004-13-16. Rather, we have
determined that a stand-alone AD is more appropriate to address the
airplanes that were not identified in the applicability of AD 2004-13-
16.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Embraer issued Service Bulletin 145-78-0035, Revision 03, dated
November 26, 2004. This service information describes procedures for
installing new stow/transit switches having part number 83-990-168 on
both engines. This service information is reasonably available because
the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
    Embraer also issued Service Bulletin 145-78-0035, Revision 02,
dated January 31, 2003, which the Director of the Federal Register
approved for incorporation by reference as of August 3, 2004 (69 FR
38819, June 29, 2004).

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined the unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Requirements of This AD

    This AD requires accomplishing the actions specified in the service
information described previously.

FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date

    Since there are currently no domestic operators of this product,
notice and opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are
unnecessary. In addition, for the reason stated above, we find that
good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30
days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2019-0118; Product
Identifier 2018-NM-143-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD based on
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Currently, there are no affected U.S.-registered airplanes. If an
affected airplane is imported and placed on the U.S. Register in the
future, we provide the following cost estimates to comply with this AD:

                  Estimated Costs for Required Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Cost per
              Labor cost                   Parts cost        product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 work-hours x $85 per hour = $680....            $194             $874
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and
associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2019-03-30 Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer):
Amendment 39-19582; Docket No. FAA-2019-0118; Product Identifier
2018-NM-143-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective March 26, 2019.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(Embraer) Model EMB-135ER, -135KE, -135KL, and -135LR airplanes; and
Model EMB-145, -145ER, -145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -145MP, and -145EP
airplanes identified in Embraer Service Bulletin 145-78-0035,
Revision 03, dated November 26, 2004; certificated in any category;
except airplanes identified in Embraer Service Bulletin 145-78-0035,
Revision 02, dated January 31, 2003.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 78, Engine
Exhaust.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of internal corrosion of the
stow/transit switches installed in the engine thrust reversers. We
are issuing this AD to address corrosion of the stow/transit
switches, which could result in uncommanded loss of engine power in-
flight or erroneous signals in the Engine Indicating and Crew
Alerting System (EICAS), which could induce aborted takeoffs.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Installation of Stow/Transit Switches

    Before the accumulation of 2,000 total flight hours, or within
400 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later, install new stow/transit switches having part number
(P/N) 83-990-168, on the #1 and #2 engine thrust reversers, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Embraer Service
Bulletin 145-78-0035, Revision 03, dated November 26, 2004.

(h) Parts Installation Limitation

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install, on
any airplane, a stow/transit switch having P/N 83-990-137 or P/N 83-
990-152.

(i) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using the applicable document specified in
paragraphs (i)(1), (i)(2), and (i)(3) of this AD.
    (1) Embraer Service Bulletin 145-78-0035, dated October 4, 2002.
This document is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
    (2) Embraer Service Bulletin 145-78-0035, Revision 01, dated
December 11, 2002. This document is not incorporated by reference in
this AD.
    (3) Embraer Service Bulletin 145-78-0035, Revision 02, dated
January 31, 2003. This document is incorporated by reference in AD
2004-13-16, Amendment 39-13698 (69 FR 38819, June 29, 2004).

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (k)(2) of this AD. Information
may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the Ag[ecirc]ncia
Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC); or ANAC's authorized
Designee. If approved by the ANAC Designee, the approval must
include the Designee's authorized signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any service information
contains procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended.
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the
operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.

(k) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Brazilian AD 2001-05-03R3, dated April 22, 2003, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2019-0118.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Kathleen
Arrigotti, Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (l)(5) and (l)(6) of this AD.

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
April 15, 2019.
    (i) Embraer Service Bulletin 145-78-0035, Revision 03, dated
November 26, 2004.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (4) The following service information was approved for IBR on
August 3, 2004 (69 FR 38819, June 29, 2004).
    (i) Embraer Service Bulletin 145-78-0035, Revision 02, dated
January 31, 2003. Pages 1 and 2 of this document are identified as
Revision 02, dated January 31, 2003; pages 3 through 13 are
identified as the original version, dated October 4, 2002.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (5) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer), Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170--
Putim--12227-901 S[atilde]o Jose dos Campos--SP--Brasil; telephone
+55 12 3927-5852 or +55 12 3309-0732; fax +55 12 3927-7546; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet http://www.flyembraer.com.
    (6) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
    (7) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on February 28, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-04312 Filed 3-8-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 111 (Friday, June 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 37874]
[FR Doc No: 2023-12369]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fresno Cogeneration Partners, L.P.......  EG00-32-001
Fifth Standard Solar PV, LLC............  EG23-88-000
San Jacinto Grid, LLC...................  EG23-89-000
Ortega Grid, LLC........................  EG23-90-000
Baldy Mesa Solar, LLC...................  EG23-91-000
Double Black Diamond Solar Power, LLC...  EG23-93-000
Landrace Holdings, LLC..................  EG23-94-000
PGR 2021 Lessee 18, LLC.................  EG23-95-000
Virginia Line Solar, LLC................  EG23-96-000
PGR 2022 Lessee 1, LLC..................  EG23-97-000
Remy Jade II, LLC.......................  EG23-98-000
Newport Solar, LLC......................  EG23-99-000
CED Peregrine Solar, LLC................  EG23-100-000
Waverly Solar, LLC......................  EG23-101-000
Cavalier Solar A, LLC...................  EG23-102-000
Foxhound Solar, LLC.....................  EG23-103-000
Texas Solar Nova 2, LLC.................  EG23-104-000
Partin Solar LLC........................  EG23-105-000
Desert Peak Energy Center, LLC..........  EG23-106-000
Desert Peak Energy Storage I, LLC.......  EG23-107-000
Desert Peak Energy Storage II, LLC......  EG23-108-000
Lakewood Cogeneration, L.P..............  EG99-197-001
Stanton Battery Energy Storage LLC......  EG23-109-000
Santa Paula Energy Storage, LLC.........  EG23-110-000
Westlake Chemicals & Vinyls LLC.........  EG23-111-000
AES ES Westwing, LLC....................  EG23-112-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of May 2023, the status of the
above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became
effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a)
(2022).

    Dated: June 5, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-12369 Filed 6-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: December 14, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 239)]
[Notices]
[Page 73996]
[DOCID:fr14de05-49]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-135-000]

National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes
in FERC Gas Tariff

December 8, 2005.
    Take notice that on December 1, 2005, National Fuel Gas Supply
Corporation (National Fuel) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas
Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, Sixth Revised Sheet No. 12 and
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 478, to be effective January 1, 2006.
    National Fuel states that copies of this filing were served upon
its customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-7316 Filed 12-13-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P