[Federal Register: June 2, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 106)]
[Notices]
[Page 32063-32064]
[DOCID:fr02jn06-50]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-216-002]

Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.; Notice of Compliance
Filing

May 26, 2006.
    Take notice that on April 26, 2006, Iroquois Gas Transmission
System, L.P., (Iroquois) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, Sixth Revised Sheet No. 50B, with
an effective date of March 9, 2006.
    Iroquois states that the filing is being made in response to the
Commission's March 9, 2006 order accepting and suspending subject to
conditions, earlier tariff sheets filed by Iroquois on February 7,
2006. Iroquois states that the above referenced tariff sheet replaces
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 50B that was erroneously filed with Iroquois'
April 10, 2006 compliance filing.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons

unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the

Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any
FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-8604 Filed 6-1-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 231 (Friday, December 2, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73937-73938]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26257]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2022-0906]

Safety Zone; Sausalito Lighted Boat Parade Fireworks Display,
Richardson Bay, Sausalito, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notification of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone in the navigable
waters of Richardson Bay, off Sausalito, CA, in support of the
Sausalito Lighted Boat Parade Fireworks Display. This safety zone is
necessary to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment
from the dangers associated with pyrotechnics. During the enforcement
period, unauthorized persons or vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or remaining in the safety zone, unless
authorized by the designated Patrol Commander (PATCOM) or other
federal, state, or local agencies on scene to assist the Coast Guard in
enforcing the regulated area.

DATES: The regulation in 33 CFR 165.1191, will be enforced for the
location in Table 1 to Sec.  165.1191, Item number 30, from 11 a.m.
through 8:35 p.m. on December 10, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notification of enforcement, call or email MST1 Shannon Curtaz-Milian,
Sector San Francisco Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
415-399-3585, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone
established in 33 CFR 165.1191, Table 1, Item number 30, for the
Sausalito Lighted Boat Parade Fireworks on December 10, 2022. The Coast
Guard will enforce a 100-foot safety zone around the fireworks barge
during the loading, transit, and setup of the fireworks barge from the
loading location to the display location and until the commencement of
the fireworks display. From 11 a.m. until 2 p.m. on December 10, 2022,
the fireworks barge will be loading pyrotechnics at Pier 50 in San
Francisco, CA. The fireworks barge will remain at the loading location
until its transit to the display location. From 6:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.
on December 10, 2022 the loaded fireworks barge will transit from Pier
50 to the launch site near Sausalito Point in approximate position
37[deg]51'11.88'' N, 122[deg]28'25.67'' W (NAD 83), where it will
remain until the conclusion of the fireworks display. Starting at 7:30
p.m. on December 10, 2022, 30 minutes prior to the commencement of the
5-minute fireworks display, the safety zone will encompass the
navigable waters, from surface to bottom, surrounding the fireworks
barge near Spinnaker Point in Sausalito, CA within a radius of 1,000
feet from approximate position 37[deg]51'11.88'' N, 122[deg]28'25.67''
W (NAD 83) for the Sausalito Lighted Boat Parade Fireworks Display as
set forth in 33 CFR 165.1191, Table 1, Item number 30. The safety zone
will be enforced through 8:35 p.m. on December 10, 2022.
    In addition to this notification of enforcement in the Federal
Register, the Coast Guard plans to provide notification of this
enforcement period via the Local Notice to Mariners.
    Under the provisions of 33 CFR 165.1191, unauthorized persons or
vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring in the safety zone during all applicable effective dates and
times, unless authorized to do so by the PATCOM or other Official
Patrol defined as a federal, state, or local law enforcement agency on
scene to assist the Coast Guard in enforcing the regulated area.
Additionally, each person who receives notice of a lawful order or
direction issued by the PATCOM or Official Patrol shall obey the order
or direction. The PATCOM or Official Patrol may, upon request, allow
the transit of commercial vessels through regulated areas when it is
safe to do so.
    If the Captain of the Port determines that the regulated area need
not be enforced for the full duration stated in this notice, a Marine
Information Broadcast, the Local Notice to Mariners, and/or actual
notice may be used to grant general permission to enter the regulated
area.

    Dated: November 23, 2022.
Taylor Q. Lam,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2022-26257 Filed 12-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27078-27080]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12454]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Hazardous Materials: Notice of Applications for Special Permits

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: List of applications for special permits.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations, notice is hereby given
that the Office of Hazardous Materials Safety has received the
application described herein.

DATES:  Comments must be received on or before July 11, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Record Center, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
20590.
    Comments should refer to the application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of comments is desired, include
a self-addressed stamped postcard showing the special permit number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Paquet, Director, Office of
Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits Division, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, East Building, PHH-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
Southeast, Washington, DC 20590-0001,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of the applications are available for
inspection in the Records Center, East Building, PHH-30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue Southeast, Washington DC or at http://regulations.gov.
Each mode of transportation for which a particular special permit is
requested is indicated by a number in the ``Nature of Application''
portion of the table below as follows: 1--Motor vehicle, 2--Rail
freight, 3--Cargo vessel, 4--Cargo aircraft only, 5--Passenger-carrying
aircraft.
    This notice of receipt of applications for special permit is
published in accordance with part 107 of the Federal

hazardous materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR
1.53(b)).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 4, 2018.
Donald P. Burger,
Chief, General Approvals and Permits Branch.

                          Special Permits Data
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Nature of the
 Application No.     Applicant      Regulation(s)      special permits
                                       affected            thereof
------------------------------------------------------------------------
20655-N.........  UTAH STATE       173.185(a).....  To authorize the
                   UNIVERSITY                        transportation in
                   RESEARCH                          commerce of low
                   FOUNDATION.                       production lithium
                                                     ion batteries
                                                     contained in
                                                     equipment by cargo-
                                                     only aircraft.
                                                     (mode 4)
20656-N.........  THE SHERWIN-     173.306(a)(3)(v  To authorize the
                   WILLIAMS         ).               transportation in
                   MANUFACTURING                     commerce of 2Q
                   COMPANY.                          receptacles that
                                                     have been tested in
                                                     an alternative
                                                     manner. (modes 1,
                                                     2, 3)
20657-N.........  NATIONAL         173.302a(a)(1).  To authorize the
                   AERONAUTICS                       transportation in
                   AND SPACE                         commerce of non-DOT
                   ADMINISTRATION.                   specification
                                                     pressure vessels
                                                     incorporated into
                                                     spacecraft via
                                                     cargo vessel. (mode
                                                     3)
20658-N.........  NATIONAL         172.400,         To authorize the
                   AERONAUTICS      172.300, 173.1.  transportation in
                   AND SPACE                         commerce of non-DOT
                   ADMINISTRATION.                   specification
                                                     packagings
                                                     containing
                                                     explosive articles
                                                     that are not
                                                     required to be
                                                     marked or labeled.
                                                     (modes 1, 3)
20659-N.........  NATIONAL         173.302a(a)(1).  To authorize the
                   AERONAUTICS                       transportation in
                   AND SPACE                         commerce of non-DOT
                   ADMINISTRATION.                   specification
                                                     pressure vessels
                                                     that are
                                                     incorporated into
                                                     spacecraft. (modes
                                                     1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
20661-N.........  SAFT AMERICA     172.400,         To authorize the
                   INC.             172.300,         transportation in
                                    173.301(g),      commerce of large
                                    173.301(h),      lithium battery
                                    173.302a(a)(1)   assemblies mounted
                                    , 173.185(b).    in ISO containers
                                                     that incorporate
                                                     non-DOT
                                                     specification
                                                     cylinders. (modes
                                                     1, 3)
20663-N.........  DEPARTMENT OF    173.219(b)(6)..  To authorize the
                   DEFENSE                           transportation in
                   (MILITARY                         commerce of life-
                   SURFACE                           saving appliances
                   DEPLOYMENT &                      that contain
                   DISTRIBUTION                      Division 1.4C
                   COMMAND).                         material. (modes 1,
                                                     2, 3)
20664-N.........  FLAMMAT DOO      172.101(i)(1)..  To authorize the
                   BEOGRAD.                          transportation in
                                                     commerce of
                                                     firelighters as
                                                     limited quantities.
                                                     (mode 1)
20667-N.........  HAZ MAT          173.12(b)(3)...  To authorize the
                   SERVICES,                         transportation in
                   INCORPORATED.                     commerce of cyanide
                                                     compounds in lab
                                                     packs. (mode 1)
20669-N.........  LOUISIANA        173.420........  To authorize the
                   ENERGY                            transportation in
                   SERVICES, LLC.                    commerce of 48Y
                                                     Uranium
                                                     Hexafluoride
                                                     cylinders which do
                                                     not conform to ANSI
                                                     N14.1-2012
                                                     specification for
                                                     the cylinder valve
                                                     cap gasket. (mode
                                                     1)
20670-N.........  Envases de       172.203(a),      To authorize the
                   Acero, S.A. de   172.301(c),      ultrasonic
                   C.V.             180.209(a),      examination of DOT
                                    180.213.         specification 3AX,
                                                     3AAX, 3T, 3A and
                                                     3AA cylinders in
                                                     lieu of hydrostatic
                                                     testing. (modes 1,
                                                     2, 3, 4, 5)
20671-N.........  STERICYCLE       171.1..........  To authorize the
                   SPECIALTY                         transportation in
                   WASTE                             commerce of certain
                   SOLUTIONS, INC.                   materials
                                                     authorized to be
                                                     disposed of under
                                                     21 CFR part 1317,
                                                     Subpart B by cargo
                                                     vessel. (mode 3)
20673-N.........  Airopack B.V...  173.306(a).....  To authorize the
                                                     manufacture, mark,
                                                     sale, and use of
                                                     non-DOT
                                                     specification
                                                     receptacles
                                                     containing aerosols
                                                     that are not
                                                     subject to the
                                                     requirements of the
                                                     HMR. (modes 1, 2,
                                                     3, 4, 5)
20674-N.........  Pacific Tugboat  176.166(a)(5)..  To authorize the
                   Service.                          transportation in
                                                     commerce of
                                                     articles in
                                                     compatibility group
                                                     B in excess of 5 kg
                                                     by cargo vessel.
                                                     (mode 3)
20675-N.........  COLEP PORTUGAL,  178.33-7(a)....  To authorize the
                   S.A.                              manufacture, mark,
                                                     sale, and use of
                                                     non-DOT
                                                     specification
                                                     receptacles similar
                                                     to 2Q receptacles
                                                     with a reduced wall
                                                     thickness. (modes
                                                     1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
20677-N.........  DEPARTMENT OF    173.302a(a)(1).  To authorize the
                   DEFENSE                           transportation in
                   (MILITARY                         commerce of non-DOT
                   SURFACE                           specification
                   DEPLOYMENT &                      cylinders. (modes
                   DISTRIBUTION                      1, 2, 3, 4)
                   COMMAND).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2018-12454 Filed 6-8-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4909-60-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 234 (Thursday, December 7, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57694-57698]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26304]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2016-0211 FRL-9971-60-Region 5]

Air Plan Approval; Indiana; Regional Haze Five-Year Progress
Report State Implementation Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve the Indiana regional haze progress report under the Clean Air
Act as a revision to the Indiana State Implementation Plan (SIP).
Indiana has satisfied the progress report requirements of the Regional
Haze Rule. Indiana has also met the requirements for a determination of
the adequacy of its regional haze plan with its negative declaration
submitted with the progress report.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 8, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2016-0211 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Becker, Life Scientist,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section is arranged as follows:

I. Background
II. EPA's Analysis of Indiana's Regional Haze Progress Report and
Adequacy Determination
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    States are required to submit a progress report every five years
that evaluates progress towards the Reasonable Progress Goals (RPGs)
for each mandatory Class I Federal area within the State and in each
mandatory Class I Federal area outside the State which may be affected
by emissions from within the State. See 40 CFR 51.308(g). States are
also required to submit, at the same time as the progress report, a
determination of the adequacy of the State's existing regional haze
SIP. See 40 CFR 51.308(h). The first progress report is due five years
after the submittal of the initial regional haze SIP.

    Indiana initially submitted its regional haze plan on January 14,
2011. The final corrected version was submitted on March 10, 2011. EPA
finalized a limited approval of Indiana's regional haze plan into its
SIP on June 11, 2012. 77 FR 32418. As part of the action, EPA also
approved limits for the aluminum fabricating facility owned and
operated by Alcoa, Inc. and located in Warrick County, Indiana, which
were determined by EPA to satisfy the requirements for best available
retrofit technology (BART).
    Indiana submitted its five-year progress report on March 30, 2016.
This is a report on progress made in the first implementation period
towards RPGs for Class I areas outside of Indiana. Indiana does not
have any Class I areas within its borders. This progress report SIP
included a determination that Indiana's existing regional haze SIP
requires no substantive revision to achieve the established regional
haze visibility improvement and emissions reduction goals for 2018. EPA
is proposing to approve Indiana's progress report on the basis that it
satisfies the applicable requirements of the rule at 40 CFR 51.308.

II. EPA's Analysis of Indiana's Regional Haze Progress Report and
Adequacy Determination

    On March 30, 2016, Indiana submitted a revision to its regional
haze SIP to address progress made in the first planning period towards
RPGs for Class I areas that are affected by emissions from Indiana's
sources. This progress report also included a determination of the
adequacy of the state's existing regional haze SIP.
    Even though Indiana has no Class I areas within its borders, the
State reviewed technical analyses conducted by the Midwest Regional
Planning Organization (MRPO) and other regional planning organizations
(RPOs) to determine which Class I areas are affected by Indiana's
emissions. The five relevant RPOs are the Mid-Atlantic and Northeastern
Visibility Union (MANE-VU) for the Northeastern states, the Visibility
Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTAS),
MRPO, the Central Regional Air Planning Association (CENRAP), and
Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP). The following Class I areas in
other states were identified as possibly being impacted by Indiana
sources (77 FR 3975, January 26, 2012):

Southeastern U.S. (VISTAS)--Sipsey Wilderness Area, AL; Mammoth Cave
National Park, KY; Great Smoky Mountains National Park, NC and TN;
James River Face Wilderness Area, VA; Shenandoah National Park, VA; and
Dolly Sods/Otter Creek Wilderness Areas, WV
Eastern U.S. (MANE-VU)--Acadia National Park, ME; Moosehorn Wilderness
Area, ME; Great Gulf Wilderness Area, NH; Brigantine Wilderness Area,
NJ; and Lye Brook Wilderness Area, VT
Northern U.S. (MRPO and CENRAP)--Isle Royale National Park, MI; Seney
National Wildlife Refuge, MI; Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness
Area, MN; and Voyageurs National Park, MN
South Central U.S. (CENRAP)--Hercules-Glades Wilderness Area, MO; Mingo
Wilderness Area, MO; Caney Creek Wilderness Area, AR; and Upper Buffalo
Wilderness Area, AR

A. Regional Haze Progress Report SIPs

    The following section includes EPA's analysis of Indiana's progress
report submittal and an explanation of the basis of our proposed
approval.
1. Status of Implementation of All Measures Included in the Regional
Haze SIP
    In its progress report, Indiana summarized the implementation
status of the control strategies that were included in its 2011
regional haze SIP, specifically, the status of the on-the-books
emissions reduction measures in addition to reductions from federal
regulatory programs such as: Tier 2 Vehicle Emissions and Gasoline
Standards Rule; Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine and Highway Diesel Fuel Rule;
Non-road Engine Diesel Fuel Rule (Tier 4); and Maximum Achievable
Control Technology. In its regional haze strategy, Indiana did not rely
on additional emissions controls from other states. Indiana also noted
the following additional controls measures, which are expected to
result in emissions reductions between 2011 and 2018, but were not
relied upon in Indiana's Regional Haze SIP: 2010 SO2
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (75 FR 35519, June 22, 2010);
Mercury and Air Toxics Standard Rule (79 FR 68777, November 19, 2014);
and Tier 3 Vehicle Emissions and Fuel Standard Program (79 FR 23414,
April 28, 2014).
    In its regional haze SIP, Indiana relied on the Clean Air
Interstate Rule (CAIR) to meet the sulfur dioxide (SO2) and
nitrogen oxides (NOX) BART requirements for its electric
generating units (EGUs) as well as to ensure reasonable progress.
Indiana's progress report describes the litigation regarding CAIR and
Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) that has had a substantial
impact on EPA's review of the regional haze SIPs of many states.
    In 2005, EPA issued regulations allowing states to rely on CAIR to
meet certain requirements of the Regional Haze Rule. See 70 FR 39104
(July 6, 2005).\1\ A number of states, including Indiana, submitted
regional haze SIPs consistent with these regulatory provisions. CAIR,
however, was remanded (without vacatur) to EPA in 2008, North Carolina
v. EPA, 550 F.3d 1176, 1178 (D.C. Cir. 2008), and replaced by CSAPR. 76
FR 48208 (August 8, 2011). Implementation of CSAPR was scheduled to
begin on January 1, 2012, when CSAPR would have superseded the CAIR
program. However, numerous parties filed petitions for review of CSAPR,
and at the end of 2011, the D.C. Circuit issued an order staying CSAPR
pending resolution of the petitions and directing EPA to continue to
administer CAIR. Order of December 30, 2011, in EME Homer City
Generation, L.P. v. EPA, D.C. Cir. No. 11-1302.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ CAIR required certain states like Indiana to reduce
emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides
(NOX) that significantly contribute to downwind
nonattainment of the 1997 National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone.
See 70 FR 25162 (May 12, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EPA finalized a limited approval of Indiana's regional haze SIP on
June 11, 2012. 77 FR 39177. In a separate action, published on June 7,
2012, EPA finalized a limited disapproval of the Indiana regional haze
SIP because of the state's reliance on CAIR to meet certain regional
haze requirements, and issued a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to
address the deficiencies identified in the limited disapproval of
Indiana and other states' regional haze plans. 77 FR 33642. The FIP
relied on CSAPR to meet certain regional haze requirements,
notwithstanding that CSAPR was stayed at the time. Following additional
litigation and the lifting of the stay, EPA began implementation of
CSAPR on January 1, 2015.
    Regarding the status of BART and reasonable progress control
requirements for non-EGU sources in the state, one non-EGU source, the
Alcoa facility in Warrick County, was identified as BART-eligible and
shown to contribute significantly to visibility impairment at Class I
areas in other states. EPA approved Indiana's alternative BART strategy
of controlling emissions from a non-BART boiler unit in our June 11,
2012, limited approval of Indiana's regional haze SIP. 77 FR 34218.
    EPA proposes to conclude that Indiana has adequately addressed the

status of control measures in its regional haze SIP. Indiana describes
the implementation status of measures from its regional haze SIP,
including the status of control measures to meet BART and reasonable
progress requirements, the status of measures from on-the-book controls
and the status of federal regulatory programs.
2. Summary of Emissions Reductions Achieved in the State Through
Implementation of Measures
    In its progress report, Indiana discusses the emissions reductions
resulting from the control strategies included in its 2011 regional
haze SIP. As described above, throughout the litigation surrounding
CAIR and CSAPR, EPA continued to implement CAIR. Thus, CAIR was in
effect through the end of 2014.
    Indiana listed its EGUs' emissions of SO2 and
NOX for 2005, 2009, and 2013, along with its CSAPR budgets.
In the progress report, Indiana showed that 2013 state-wide
SO2 emissions from EGUs were 268,217 tons, below the CSAPR
budget of 285,424 tons. Indiana also showed that 2013 state-wide
NOX emissions from EGUs were 103,048 tons, below the CSAPR
budget of 109,726 tons. Indiana's SO2 and NOX EGU
emissions for 2013 were 6% lower than the 2013 CSAPR budgets for both
pollutants. Table 1 below summarizes the emission reductions reported
by Indiana.

            Table 1--Indiana EGU Emissions Reported to the Clean Air Markets Program Division (CAMD)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    NOX  (tons)     NOX budget      SO2  (tons)     SO2 budget
                      Year                                            (tons)                          (tons)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005............................................         210,646  ..............         870,812  ..............
2009............................................         113,601  ..............         413,726  ..............
2013............................................         103,048         109,726         268,217         285,424
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Assessment of Visibility Conditions and Changes for Each Mandatory
Class I Federal Area in the State
    Indiana noted in its progress report that it does not have any
Class I areas within its boundaries, and as the applicable provisions
pertain only to states containing Class I areas, no further discussion
is necessary. EPA concurs, and proposes to conclude that Indiana has
adequately addressed the applicable provisions of 40 CFR 51.308(g).
4. Analysis Tracking Emissions Changes of Visibility-Impairing
Pollutants
    In its progress report, Indiana tracked changes in emissions of
visibility-impairing pollutants using its 2005 base emissions and
projected 2018 emissions in its regional haze plan submitted in 2011.
The progress report gives current annual emissions for SO2
and NOX that can be compared to the base emissions and 2018
projected emissions. Base emissions of SO2 in 2005 were
956,031 tons, with a 64 percent reduction to 346,429 tons in 2014.
Indiana reported 2011 SO2 total emissions of 425,786 tons.
The NOX base emissions in 2005 were 283,059 tons, with a 42
percent reduction to 164,520 tons in 2014. Indiana reported 2011
NOX emissions of 180,674 tons.
    Indiana noted that SO2 emissions have been reduced
considerably between 2005 and 2014, based on actual reported emissions.
These reductions were due primarily to regulations focused on reducing
SO2 emissions from coal-burning power plants and other large
sources, such as various types of boilers and incinerators, which are
the largest emitters of SO2.
    The actual decrease in NOX emissions was not as
substantial as the decrease in SO2 emissions between 2005
and 2014. This is because the NOX SIP call which
significantly reduced NOX emissions took place in 2004
(before the examined timeframe of 2005-2014), and NOX
emissions from sources other than EGUs combined are much higher than
NOX emissions from EGUs alone. Actual NOX
emissions reported from contributing sources in Indiana decreased
incrementally over the first five-year timeframe (2005-2009) by 38%.
The NOX emissions reduction between 2010 and 2014 decreased
by only 13%, due to increases in NOX emissions from point,
mobile, and non-road sources in 2010 and 2011; but total NOX
emissions decreased by 42% between 2004 and 2014. These reductions show
that Indiana is in line with improvements predicted by the modeling for
2012 and will likely exceed visibility improvements anticipated by
2018. Table 2 below summarizes the actual SO2 and
NOX emission from contributing sources in Indiana between
2005 and 2014.

   Table 2--Actual (Reported) SO2 and NOX Emissions From Contributing
                           Sources in Indiana
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       SO2        NOX
                       Year                           (tons)     (tons)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005..............................................    956,031    283,059
2006..............................................    920,251    260,810
2007..............................................    797,900    276,402
2008..............................................    669,936    273,903
2009..............................................    480,884    174,828
2010..............................................    480,628    187,988
2011..............................................    425,786    180,674
2012..............................................    343,124    171,136
2013..............................................    340,786    165,778
2014..............................................    346,429    164,520
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EPA concurs and proposes to conclude that Indiana has adequately
addressed the applicable provisions of 40 CFR 51.308.
5. Assessment of Any Significant Changes in Anthropogenic Emissions
    In its progress report, Indiana indicated that no significant
changes in anthropogenic emissions have impeded progress in reducing
emissions and improving visibility in Class I areas impacted by Indiana
sources. As mentioned above, Indiana acknowledges in its progress
report that there was an increase in total NOX emissions
from contributing sources in Indiana in 2010 and 2011. To address this
potential concern, Indiana points out that NOX emissions
began to decrease once again in 2012, and continued to decrease every
subsequent year through 2014. Indiana also states that the decrease in
SO2 and NOX emissions between from 2005 and 2009
was so significant that the slight increase of NOX in 2010
and 2011 had no actual impact in the overall progress made from 2005 to
2014. For these reasons, Indiana does not consider the increase of
NOX emission in 2010 and 2011 a problem that has or will
impede future visibility progress in

states with Class I areas potentially impacted by Indiana sources.
    EPA concurs and proposes to conclude that Indiana has adequately
addressed the applicable provisions of 40 CFR 51.308.
6. Assessment of Whether the Implementation Plan Elements and
Strategies Are Sufficient To Enable Other States To Meet RPGs
    In its progress report, Indiana states that it has implemented, or
expects to implement by 2018, all controls from its regional haze plan.
The state noted in the progress report that its emissions are on track
for the 2018 goals, including reductions that are ahead of pace for the
key pollutants, SO2 and NOX. Indiana assessed
each of the areas identified in the MRPO report as being impacted by
Indiana sources using information provided by the MRPO, technical
documents from the other RPOs, and letters received from other states
indicating their decisions regarding reasonable progress goals.
    Indiana's long term strategy relied on the emission reductions from
CAIR, a program that has now been replaced by CSAPR. At the present
time, the requirements of CSAPR apply to sources in Indiana under the
terms of a FIP. The Regional Haze Rule requires an assessment of
whether the current ``implementation plan'' is sufficient to enable the
states to meet all established reasonable progress goals. 40 CFR
51.308(g). The term ``implementation plan'' is defined for purposes of
the Regional Haze Rule to mean ``any [SIP], [FIP], or Tribal
Implementation Plan.'' 40 CFR 51.301. EPA is considering measures in
any applicable FIP, as well as those in a state's regional haze SIP, in
assessing the adequacy of the ``existing implementation plan'' under 40
CFR 51.308(g)(6) and (h).
    EPA applies this requirement as an assessment of emissions and
visibility trends and other readily available information. Indiana
determined that its regional haze SIP is sufficient to enable other
States to meet the RPGs for the Class I areas impacted by the State's
emissions. EPA proposes to conclude that Indiana has adequately
addressed the applicable provisions of 40 CFR 51.308.
7. Review of the State's Visibility Monitoring Strategy
    Indiana's progress report states there are no Class I areas within
its borders and thus finds that the State is not required to have a
visibility monitoring strategy in place. EPA concurs, and proposes to
conclude that Indiana has adequately addressed the requirements for a
monitoring strategy for regional haze and propose to determine no
further modifications to the monitoring strategy are required.

B. Determination of Adequacy of Existing Regional Haze Plan

    In its progress report, Indiana submitted a negative declaration to
EPA regarding the need for additional actions or emission reductions in
Indiana beyond those already in place and those to be implemented by
2018 according to Indiana's regional haze plan.
    Indiana determined that its regional haze plan is adequate to meet
the Regional Haze Rule requirements and expects Class I areas affected
by Indiana to achieve the reasonable progress goals. EPA finds that the
state is on track to meet the visibility improvement and emission
reduction goals.
    Because monitored visibility values and emission trends indicate
that Class I areas impacted by Indiana's sources are meeting or
exceeding the RPGs for 2018, and are expected to continue to meet or
exceed the RPGs for 2018, EPA proposes to conclude that Indiana has
adequately addressed the provisions under 40 CFR 51.308(h).

C. Public Participation

    On January 14, 2016, Indiana provided an opportunity for Federal
Land Managers (FLMs) to review the revision to Indiana's SIP reporting
on progress made during the first implementation period toward RPGs for
Class I areas outside the state that are affected by emissions from
Indiana's sources. Comments were received from the U.S. Forest Service
and National Park Service. Indiana's progress report, in Appendix D,
includes the FLM comments and the State's responses to the comments.
    On February 19, 2016, Indiana published notification for a request
for public hearing and solicitation for full public comment on the
draft progress report in widely distributed publications. A public
hearing was not requested, and no comments were received.
    EPA proposes to find that Indiana has addressed the applicable
requirements in 51.308(i) regarding FLM consultation.

III. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is proposing to approve Indiana's Regional Haze five-year
progress report, submitted March 30, 2016, as meeting the applicable
regional haze requirements as set forth in 40 CFR 51.308(g) and
51.308(h).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land

or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that
a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule
does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: November 17, 2017.
Robert A. Kaplan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2017-26304 Filed 12-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: July 30, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 147)]
[Notices]
[Page 44261-44263]
[DOCID:fr30jy08-73]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2003-0397; FRL-8374-6]

Molinate; Product Cancellation Order and Amendment to Terminate
Uses

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA's amendment to the order for the
termination of uses, voluntarily requested by the registrant and
accepted by the Agency, of products containing the pesticide molinate,
pursuant to section 6(f)(1) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended. This amendment follows an April 7,
2004 Federal Register Notice of Order to Amend Registrations to
Terminate Uses of molinate to control water grass in rice grown in
California and the south central/south eastern states of Arkansas,
Louisiana, Missouri, Tennessee, and Texas. Nothing in today's action
changes the previous stop production date of June 30, 2008, nor does it
change the stop use date of August 31, 2009. Today's action only
clarifies the deadline for persons other than the registrant to sell
and distribute molinate until July 1, 2009.

DATES:  The cancellation amendment is effective July 30, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wilhelmena Livingston, Special Review
and Reregistration Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; pesticide
users; and members of the public interested in the sale, distribution,
or use of pesticides. Since others also may be interested, the Agency
has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be
affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?

    1. Docket. EPA has established a docket for this action under
docket identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2003-0397. Publicly
available docket materials are available either in the electronic
docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal
Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of

operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the Federal Register
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr.

II. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    This notice announces the amendment of the April 7, 2004 (69 FR
18368) (FRL-7350-9) order to amend registrations to terminate uses of
certain end-use molinate products registered under section 3 of FIFRA.
These registrations are listed in sequence by registration number in
Table 1 of this unit.

                   Table 1--Molinate Products Affected
------------------------------------------------------------------------
          EPA Registration Number                   Product Name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
100-981                                     Riceco Molinate Technical
------------------------------------------------------------------------
100-982                                     Riceco Touche
------------------------------------------------------------------------
100-983                                     Molinate 15-G
------------------------------------------------------------------------
100-1021                                    Ordram 8-E An emulsufiable
                                             liquid
------------------------------------------------------------------------
100-1036                                    Arrosolo 3-3E
------------------------------------------------------------------------
100-1039                                    Ordram 15-G
------------------------------------------------------------------------
100-1040                                    Ordram Technical
------------------------------------------------------------------------
100-1102                                    Ordram 15GM Rice Herbicide
------------------------------------------------------------------------
74530-7                                     Molinate Technical
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CA77015900                                  Ordram 8-E an emulsufiable
                                             liquid
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CA84017200                                  Ordram 8-E an emulsufiable
                                             liquid
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CA85005300                                  Ordram 8-E an emulsufiable
                                             liquid
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TX81002600                                  Ordram 8-E an emulsufiable
                                             liquid
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TN93000700                                  Ordram 15-G
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Table 2 of this Unit includes the name and address of record for
the Registrants of the product in Table 1 of this Unit, in seqence by
EPA company number:

            Table 2--Registrants of Amended Molinate Products
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            EPA Company Number                Company Name and Address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
100                                         Syngenta Crop Protection,
                                             Inc.P.O. Box 18300
                                             Greenboro, NC 27419-8300
------------------------------------------------------------------------
74530                                       Helm Agro U.S., Inc.
                                             Nordkanalstrasse 28D-20097
                                             Hamburg, Germany
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On April 7, 2004, EPA published a Cancellation Order with respect
to products containing S-ethyl hexahyfor-1H-azepine-1-carbothioate
(monlinate) (69 FR 18368). That order provided: ``The cancellation of
these registrations has an effective date of June 30, 2008. After that
date, Syngenta Crop Protection Inc., and Helm Agro U.S. Inc, may not
sell or distribute any molinate products except as detailed in the
cancellation order. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., and Helm Agro U.S.
Inc., will be permitted to distribute the molinate active ingredient in
2009 for the purposes of facilitating usage by August 31, 2009. No use
of products containing molinate is permitted after the 2009 growing
season (August 31, 2009).''
    Today's action is intended to clarify that in the case of molinate,
the original August 31, 2009 deadline for cessation of use was
established to provide a reasonable time for the material to work
through the channels of trade following the cessation of sale and
distribution of molinate products by the registrants, Syngenta Crop
Protection, Inc., and Helm Agro U.S. Inc., on June 30, 2008. Today's
action does not affect the cancellation of the registrations in Table 1
of Unit II. In addition, clarifying that persons other than the
registrants (distributors and retailers) may sell and distribute
molinate will neither conflict with the Agency's application of the
guidelines outlined in PR Notice 97-7, nor will it introduce more
molinate into the pesticide use cycle than had been stipulated by the
terms of the five year phase-out. Allowing additional time for
distributors and retailers to sell and distribute molinate to end users
was contemplated by the original cancellation order by continuing to
allow distribution and use. Clarifying this intent will ensure that
this product is utilized safely, in accordance with the approved
labeling requirements. Thus, today's action clarifies that persons
other than the registrant may sell and distribute molinate until July
1, 2009. After July 1, 2009, all sale and distribution is prohibited,
except for the purposes of disposal or export. Today's action does not
change that end users with existing stocks of products containing
molinate may continue to use these products until August 31, 2009,
provided that the use complies with previously EPA approved product
label requirements for the respective products. Thereafter, all use
shall be prohibited except that existing stocks held by end users may
be transported for purposes of disposal or returning unused product to
the manufacturer or point-of-sale.

III. Amended Order

    EPA hereby amends the April 7, 2004 order to clarify the provisions
for the disposition of existing stocks. Existing stocks are stocks of
registered pesticide product which are currently in the United States
and which have been packaged, labeled, and released for shipment prior
to the effective date of the cancellation order, which in this case is
June 30, 2008. Specifically, persons other than the registrant
(distributors and retailers) may sell and distribute products listed in
Table 1 of Unit II containing molinate until July 1, 2009. After July
1, 2009, all sale and distribution is prohibited, except for the
purposes of disposal or export. End users may continue to use existing
stocks until August 31, 2009, provided that the use complies with
previously EPA approved product label requirements for the respective
products. Thereafter, all use shall be prohibited except that existing
stocks held by end users may be transported for purposes of disposal or
returning of unused product to the manufacturer or point-of-sale.

IV. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?

    Section 6(f)(1) of FIFRA provides that a registrant of a pesticide
product may at any time request that any of its pesticide registrations
be canceled or amended to terminate one or more uses. FIFRA further
provides that, before acting on the request, EPA must publish a notice
of receipt of any such request in the Federal Register. Thereafter,
following the public comment period, the Administrator may approve such
a request.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: July 24, 2008.
Steven Bradbury,
Director, Special Review and Reregistration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E8-17475 Filed 7-29-08]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 64 (Friday, April 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18269-18270]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07620]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-74605; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2015-21]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending the NYSE
Arca Equities Schedule of Fees and Charges for Exchange Services To
Change the ETP Fee

March 30, 2015.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on March 19, 2015, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Arca Equities Schedule of
Fees and Charges for Exchange Services to change the ETP Fee. The text
of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule to change the name
of the ``Monthly ETP Fee'' to ``ETP Fee'' and to cease to waive the ETP
Fee by adding an ETP Fee of $15,000 per year. The Exchange proposes to
implement the fee change on April 1, 2015.
    The Fee Schedule currently includes a Monthly ETP Fee charged to
ETP Holders that the Exchange has waived since 2002.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 45680 (April 2,
2002), 67 FR 17094 (April 9, 2002) (SR-PCX-2002-16) (the ``2002
Filing''). NYSE Arca Equities Rule 1.1(m) defines ``ETP'' as an
Equity Trading Permit issued by the Exchange for effecting approved
securities transactions on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Beginning April 1, 2015, the Exchange proposes to change the name
of the ``Monthly ETP Fee'' to the ``ETP Fee,'' and to set the ETP Fee
at $15,000 per year per ETP Holder.\5\ The Fee Schedule would specify
that each ETP Holder would be assessed the ETP Fee on a monthly basis
for each month during which the ETP is held for any portion of the
month. Billing would commence with the month of April 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Pursuant to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 1.1(n), the term ``ETP
Holder'' refers to a sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation,
limited liability company or other organization in good standing
that has been issued an ETP. An ETP Holder must be a registered
broker or dealer pursuant to section 15 of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes it appropriate to charge the ETP Fee to fund
the administrative and operating costs of the activity of the Exchange.
The Exchange notes that the ETP Fee would be comparable to the
analogous membership fees assessed by other markets. For example, The
Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC (``Nasdaq'') assesses a membership fee of
$3,000 per year, a trading rights fee of $1,000 per month and a fee of
$500 per month per market participant identifier and market participant
identifiers issued to a member.\6\ The Exchange's affiliate, the New
York Stock Exchange (``NYSE'') assesses an annual fee of $50,000 for
the first license held by a member

organization, and $15,000 for each additional license.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Nasdaq Rule 7001.
    \7\ See https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/nyse/NYSE_Price_List.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed change is not otherwise intended to address any other
issues, and the Exchange is not aware of any problems that ETP Holders
would have in complying with the proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with section 6(b) of the Act,\8\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\9\ in
particular, because it provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and
other persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate
between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. The Exchange believes
that charging the ETP Fee is a reasonable and equitable method of
ensuring that Exchange fees fund the administrative and operating costs
of the activity of the Exchange. The Exchange because further believes
that the proposal to charge an ETP Fee is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because all similarly situated ETP Holders would be
subject to the same ETP Fee and because access to the Exchange's market
would continue to be offered on fair and nondiscriminatory terms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is
consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\10\ the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed above, the Exchange's membership fees are comparable
to the analogous membership fees of Nasdaq and the NYSE. In addition,
membership fees are subject to competition from other exchanges. The
Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee
levels at a particular venue to be excessive. In such an environment,
the Exchange must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive
with other exchanges and with alternative trading systems that have
been exempted from compliance with the statutory standards applicable
to exchanges. Because competitors are free to modify their own fees in
response, and because market participants may readily adjust their
order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to which
fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition is
extremely limited. As a result of all of these considerations, the
Exchange does not believe that the proposed changes will impair the
ability of ETP Holders to maintain their competitive standing in the
financial markets.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
section 19(b)(3)(A) \11\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \12\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
section 19(b)(2)(B) \13\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2015-21 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2015-21. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing will also be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NYSEArca-2015-21 and should be submitted on or before April 24, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-07620 Filed 4-2-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Types of Human Studies and the Types of Human Studies and the Role of Human Studies in Pesticide Role of Human Studies in Pesticide Risk Assessment Risk Assessment Ray Kent, Ph. D.

Ray Kent, Ph. D.

U. S. EPA U. S. EPA Office of Pesticide Programs Office of Pesticide Programs April 4, 2006 April 4, 2006 2 Scope of Human Studies in OPP Scope of Human Studies in OPP

Toxicity studies

Absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion Studies

Exposure studies

Special studies 3 Toxicity Studies Reviewed in OPP Toxicity Studies Reviewed in OPP

Systemic toxicity studies

Dermal irritation or sensitization

Eye irritation and other sensory threshold studies

Epidemiology, incident data, case reports

In vitro studies 4 Systemic Toxicity Studies Systemic Toxicity Studies

Defined as studies to identify or quantify an adverse response

Never common, these studies have increased since passage of FQPA

OPP has no guidelines for conducting such studies 5 Dermal Irritation & Sensitization Studies Dermal Irritation & Sensitization Studies

Infrequently submitted in support of conventional pesticides

Used for warnings and other label language

Sometimes submitted in support of home uses for antimicrobial pesticides

No guidelines for performing irritation or sensitization studies 6 Eye Irritation Studies Eye Irritation Studies

Studies on fumigant gasses recently submitted

May be used for quantitative risk assessment

No guidelines in OPP for human eye irritation studies 7 Epidemiology Epidemiology & Incident Data & Incident Data

Full epidemiology studies are infrequently submitted

Poisoning incidents or case reports are considered in all HED risk assessments

Epidemiologic studies and incident data are not considered to involve intentional exposure of human subjects 8 In Vitro Studies In Vitro Studies

Usually genotoxicity studies with human cell lines, or dermal absorption studies with human skin

Likely to increase in frequency as in vitro methods are perfected

Not considered to be intentional exposure of human subjects 9 Which Toxicity Studies Go to the HSRB?

Which Toxicity Studies Go to the HSRB?

Need HSRB review  Systemic toxicity  Dermal irritation or sensitization  Eye irritation No HSRB review  Epidemiology  Poisoning or incident data  In vitro studies 10 ADME Studies ADME Studies

Dermal absorption studies are often submitted

Used to relate exposure data and toxicity data

No guidelines for human ADME studies

Future ADME studies are subject to HSRB review 11 Exposure Studies in OPP Exposure Studies in OPP

Surveys of food consumption and human activity patterns

Pesticide handler studies

Post application studies

Biomonitoring studies 12 Dietary and human activity surveys Dietary and human activity surveys

Continuing Survey of Food Intake by Individuals ( CSFII) used in dietary exposure assessment

Consolidated Human Activity Database used in the OP and NMC cumulative assessments

Surveys are not considered intentional exposure studies subject to HSRB review 13 Pesticide Handler Studies Pesticide Handler Studies

Most common human study

The Pesticide Handlers Exposure Database ( PHED) is a database of handler studies

Guidelines published for proper conduct of handler studies

Handler studies may be subject to HSRB review 14 Post Post application Studies application Studies

Commonly submitted study for conventional pesticides

Guidelines published for proper conduct of post application studies

Post application studies may be subject to HSRB review 15 Biomonitoring Biomonitoring Studies Studies

Blood or urinary marker of exposure to determine delivered dose

Requires coordination of exposure assessor and toxicologist for proper interpretation of results

Future biomonitoring studies will likely require HSRB review 16 Special Human Studies Special Human Studies

Insect Repellent Efficacy Studies

studies are considered intentional exposure studies for purposes of HSRB review

Mechanistic Studies   requires HSRB review if human subjects are involved 17 Toxicity Reviews in HED Toxicity Reviews in HED

In HED a human toxicity study is assigned to a toxicologist familiar with the toxicology of an active ingredient

The HED toxicologist evaluates the scientific quality of a human study and how the study fits in to the overall toxicity profile of an a. i. 18 Roles of Human Toxicity Studies Roles of Human Toxicity Studies

Provide endpoint and PoD for risk assessment

Inform the interspecies uncertainty factor

Inform the intraspecies uncertainty factor 19 Roles ( continued)

Roles ( continued)

Mode or mechanism studies to establish human relevance of animal data

In vitro or in vivo Studies to develop PBPK or PBBR models 20 Conclusions Conclusions

All human toxicity studies are considered for their relevance to the risk assessment

Relevant studies are reviewed for scientific quality and ethics

The role of a study in a risk assessment is determined in a weight of evidence analysis encompassing the whole toxicity database


[Federal Register: November 3, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 211)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 57055]
[DOCID:fr03no09-27]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0435; FRL-8976-4]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Corrections to
the Arizona and Nevada State Implementation Plans

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to delete certain statutes and rules that
were erroneously approved by EPA under the Clean Air Act as part of the
Arizona and Nevada state implementation plans. The statutes that are
the subject of this proposal are from the Arizona state implementation
plan. The rules that are the subject of this proposal were adopted by
Pima County Health Department in Arizona and the State Environmental
Commission, Clark County District Board of Health, and Washoe County
District Board of Health in Nevada. The statutes and rules that EPA is
proposing to delete relate to general declarations of policy, advisory
committees, variances, and incidental fees and nuisance odors. EPA is
proposing to delete these statutes and rules under section 110(k)(6) of
the Clean Air Act. EPA is also proposing to correct certain clerical
and typographical errors in the codification of the Pima County portion
of the Arizona plan.

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by December 3, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2009-0435, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions.
    2. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Cynthia Allen (AIR-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at: http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through http://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov portal is
an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If
EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may
be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material), and some may not be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Allen, Rules Office (AIR-4),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA. This proposal addresses a number of statutes and
rules that EPA has determined were previously approved in error into
the Arizona and Nevada state implementation plans (SIPs). EPA is
proposing to delete these statutes and rules from the respective SIPs
under section 110(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act, which provides EPA
authority to remove these statutes and rules without additional State
submission.
    In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register, we
are deleting these statutes and rules, and making the necessary
corrections to the codification of the Pima County portion of the
Arizona state implementation plan, in a direct final action without
prior proposal because we believe the deletion of them is not
controversial. Please see the direct final action for a list of the
specific statutes and rules that are the subject of this action. If we
receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely withdrawal
of the direct final rule and address the comments in a subsequent
action based on this proposed rule. Please note that if we receive
adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and
if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may
adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of
an adverse comment.
    We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further
information, please see the direct final action.

    Dated: October 19, 2009.
Nancy Lindsay,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E9-26332 Filed 11-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 36 (Friday, February 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12308-12309]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04149]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2005-0062; FRL 9007-7]

Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request:
Procedures for Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act and
Assessing the Environmental Effects Abroad of EPA Actions (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is planning to submit an
information collection request (ICR), ``40 CFR Part 6: Procedures for
Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act and Assessing the
Environmental Effects Abroad of EPA Actions'' (EPA ICR No. 2243.06, OMB
Control No. 2020-0033) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Before doing so, EPA is soliciting public
comments on specific aspects of the proposed information collection as
described below. This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is
currently approved through August 31, 2013. An Agency may not conduct
or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before Tuesday, April 23, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OECA-
2005-0062 online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method) or by
mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code
28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Trice, Office of Federal
Activities, Mail Code 2252A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202)
564-6646; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit  http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA is soliciting
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of
the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. EPA
will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as appropriate.
The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for review and
approval. At that time, EPA will issue another Federal Register notice
to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to
submit additional comments to OMB.
    Abstract: The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42
U.S.C. 4321-4347 establishes a national policy for the environment. The
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) oversees the NEPA
implementation. CEQ's Regulations at 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508 set
the standard for NEPA compliance. They also require agencies to
establish their own NEPA implementing procedures. EPA's procedures for
implementing NEPA are found in 40 CFR Part 6. Through this part, EPA
adopted the CEQ Regulations and supplemented those regulations for
actions by EPA that are subject to NEPA requirements. EPA actions
subject to NEPA include the award of wastewater treatment construction
grants under Title II of the Clean Water Act, EPA's issuance of new
source National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits
under section 402 of the Clean Water Act, certain research and
development projects, development and issuance of regulations, EPA
actions involving renovations or new construction of facilities, and
certain grants awarded for projects authorized by Congress through the
Agency's annual Appropriations Act. EPA is collecting information from
certain applicants as part of the process of complying with either NEPA
or Executive Order 12114 (``Environmental Effects Abroad of Major
Federal Actions''). EPA's NEPA regulations apply to the actions of EPA
that are subject to NEPA in order to ensure that environmental
information is available to the Agency's decision-makers and the public
before decisions are made and before actions are taken. When EPA
conducts an environmental assessment pursuant to its Executive Order
12114 procedures, the Agency generally follows its NEPA procedures.
Compliance with the procedures is the responsibility of EPA's
Responsible Officials, and for applicant proposed actions applicants
may be required to provide environmental information to EPA as part of
the environmental review process. For this Information Collection
Request (ICR), applicant-proposed projects subject to either NEPA or
Executive Order 12114 (and that are not addressed in other EPA
programs' ICRs) are addressed through the NEPA process.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Entities potentially affected by
this action are certain grant or permit applicants who must submit
environmental information documentation to EPA for their projects to
comply with NEPA or Executive Order 12114, including Wastewater
Treatment Construction Grants Program facilities, State and Tribal
Assistance Grant recipients and new source National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System permittees.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Voluntary.
    Estimated number of respondents: 312.
    Frequency of response: On occasion
    Total estimated burden: 38,472 hours
    Total estimated cost: $3,503,245, includes $7,638 annualized
capital or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in Estimates: The above estimates are based on information
and data available through the current ICR supporting documentation.
However, it is anticipated that there will be slight decrease in hours
in the total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR
currently approved by OMB. This slight decrease is due to changes in
the number of respondents and their associated EPA actions eligible for
categorical exclusions which results in a reduction in total hours and
burden.

    Dated: February 15, 2013.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2013-04149 Filed 2-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 22990]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09554]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP15-889-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Section 4(d) rate filing per 154.204: 04/15/15
Negotiated Rates--Trafigura Trading LLC (HUB) 7445-89 to be effective
4/15/2015.
    Filed Date: 4/15/15.
    Accession Number: 20150415-5143.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/27/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-890-000.
    Applicants: Northwest Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Section 4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Tariff Sheet
Update Filing to be effective 5/15/2015.
    Filed Date: 4/15/15.
    Accession Number: 20150415-5169.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/27/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-891-000.
    Applicants: Ozark Gas Transmission, L.L.C.
    Description: Petition for Approval of Stipulation and Agreement of
Settlement of Ozark Gas Transmission, L.L.C.
    Filed Date: 4/15/15.
    Accession Number: 20150415-5319.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/27/15.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP15-532-001.
    Applicants: Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Compliance to RP15-532-
000 to be effective 4/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 4/15/15.
    Accession Number: 20150415-5137.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/27/15.

    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 16, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-09554 Filed 4-23-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P