[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32118-32119]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14775]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-1917-000]

Bowfin KeyCon Power, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced Bowfin KeyCon
Power, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is July 23, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for

electronic review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in
Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the website that
enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is
added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online
service, please email [email protected]. or call (866) 208-
3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 2, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-14775 Filed 7-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27865-27872]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10988]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-1101; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-013-AD;
Amendment 39-16690; AD 2011-10-09]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company Models 150,
152, 170, 172, 175, 177, 180, 182, 185, 188, 190, 195, 206, 207, 210,
T303, 336, and 337 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
for Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna) 150, 152, 170, 172, 175, 177, 180,
182, 185, 188, 190, 195, 206, 207, 210, T303, 336, and 337 series
airplanes. That AD currently requires repetitive inspections and
replacement of parts, if necessary,

of the seat rail and seat rail holes; seat pin engagement; seat
rollers, washers, and axle bolts or bushings; wall thickness of roller
housing and the tang; and lock pin springs. This new AD requires
retaining all of the actions from the previous AD and adding steps to
the inspection procedures in the previous AD. This AD was prompted by
added steps to the inspection procedures, added revised figures, and
clarification of some of the existing steps. We are issuing this AD to
prevent seat slippage or the seat roller housing from departing the
seat rail, which may consequently cause the pilot/copilot to be unable
to reach all the controls. This failure could lead to the pilot/copilot
losing control of the airplane.

DATES: This AD is effective June 17, 2011.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Park, Aerospace Engineer, ACE-
118W, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1801 Airport Road,
Room 100, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (316)
946-4107; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede airworthiness directive (AD) 87-20-03 R2,
Amendment 39-6669 (55 FR 36264, September 5, 1990; published as Docket
No. 86-CE-71-AD, Amdt. 39-6669). That AD applies to the specified
products. AD 87-20-03 R2 requires repetitive inspections and
replacement of parts, if necessary, of the seat rail and seat rail
holes; seat pin engagement; seat rollers, washers, and axle bolts or
bushings; wall thickness of roller housing and the tang; and lock pin
springs. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on November 8, 2010
(75 FR 68543). That NPRM proposed to retain all of the actions from the
previous AD and add steps to the inspection procedures in the previous
AD.
    The additional steps involve inspections of the tang thickness and
length on the seat roller housing. We also provided improved graphics
for inspecting seat track hole wear and for inspecting proper seat lock
pin engagement depth. We itemized the steps, in sequence, to provide
clearer guidance for the inspector to do the inspections.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request Change to Compliance Time

    D.A., Ken Anderson, Don Barley, Timothy J. Berg, Joseph Carter,
Gary W. Cleveland, Clifford Coy, Al Dyer, John M. Efinger, Greg Felton,
Berry Gablin, Howard Greenberg, Steve James, Richard Koril, Michael
Minton, Dustin J. Radford, Marc Stancy, Charles L. Trunck, and Walter
Wasowski requested we change the inspection compliance time to annual
inspections. They think that 100-hour time-in-service inspections are
an excessive burden on manpower and an added expense with little
benefit in safety. They also think the frequent inspections would be
difficult to monitor.
    We disagree with this comment. The unsafe condition of excessive
wear results from usage, not calendar time. The more an airplane is
used, the more likely wear will develop, causing an unsafe condition.
Parts cost will not be incurred unless the inspection results require
parts replacement. FAA regulations require posting compliance to ADs in
the aircraft logbook. The maintainer should record compliance with this
AD, which includes the 100-hour inspections, in the aircraft logbook.
    We have not changed this final rule AD action based on this
comment.

Request Change to Applicability Based on Secondary Seat Stops

    Joseph Carter, Greg Felton, Donald L. Griffith, and Richard M.
Warner requested we change the applicability based on the installation
of inertial reel secondary seat stops. They think that if the primary
seat lock fails and the seat slips, the secondary seat stops provide
additional safety.
    We partially agree with this comment. We agree that the secondary
seat stop provides additional safety for seat slippage. However, we
disagree that secondary seat stops provide adequate safety for the
unsafe condition associated with this AD action. The secondary seat
stops may be installed only on one side of the airplane, so the pilot
could occupy a seat without a secondary seat stop. Also, secondary seat
stops will not prevent the seat from lifting off the seat track.
    We have not changed this final rule AD action based on this
comment.

Request To Remove Models 150, 152, and 188 From Applicability

    Mark Stancy requested we remove Cessna Models 150, 152, and 188
from the airplane Applicability. He thinks the seat travel for those
models is too limited to justify this AD even if the locking pin were
to slip.
    We disagree with this comment. Even a limited seat travel could
affect short pilots' ability to reach the controls if the seat slips
backwards due to failure of the seat system. This AD action not only
requires inspections to prevent seat slippage but also requires
inspections to prevent the seat from lifting off the seat track.
    We have not changed this final rule AD action based on this
comment.

Request Withdrawal of Proposed AD Action

    David Abler, Brian A. Andrus, James Barbee, Timothy J. Berg, Al
Dyer, John M. Efinger, Berry Gamblin, Donald L. Giffith, Michael
Minton, Robert J. Pasch, Dustin J. Radford, Charles L. Trunck, and
Walter Wasowski requested we withdraw the proposed AD action because
they think it adds no additional safety than AD 87-20-03 R2.
    We disagree with this comment. This AD action provides additional
measurements in the inspections, more clarity in the descriptions of
the required inspections, and provides improved graphics. Inadvertent
seat movement continues to be reported. Also, we received a report of a
seat separating from the seat track due to wear of the seat roller
housing tangs.
    We have not changed this final rule AD action based on this
comment.

Request Additional Inspection With Diagrams

    One commenter requested we add an inspection of the seat stop with
diagrams showing potential damage because if the integrity of the seat
stop is retained, seat slippage will not occur. The commenter also
requested we not allow repair to the seat roller housing.
    We partially agree with this comment. We agree the seat stop should
prevent seat slippage; however, other failure modes can cause seat
slippage even with a functional seat stop. Providing

diagrams of possible damage to the seat stop area will not sufficiently
eliminate the safety issue. Service history has shown that wear and
damage to the seat installation components must be addressed. This AD
action provides clarification to the inspections for those components.
    We have not changed this final rule AD action based on this
comment.

Request an Additional Measurement to the Inspection

    Dave McFarlane requested we add a maximum allowable incremental
0.07-inch radius dimension to figure 1 at the outside diameter
dimensions for clarification.
    We disagree with this comment. The measurement dimensions in figure
1 adequately address the measurements necessary for this AD. Additional
measurements will not provide any additional benefit.
    We have not changed this final rule AD action based on this
comment.

Request Changing Compliance Based on Frequency of Seat Movement

    Joseph Carter requested we change the compliance time for the
inspection for seats that are moved infrequently because they would not
experience the same amount of wear on the seat components.
    We disagree with this comment. Inspectors would not be able to
determine the frequency seat movement.
    We have not changed this final rule AD action based on this
comment.

Request Change to the Measurement of the Tangs

    Brian A. Andrus, Jim Currie, and Jerry Unruh requested we change
the tang measurement to the outside of the seat roller housing and
change the description of the tang measurement. This change would make
it easier for the inspector to take the measurement and to better
understand what is being measured.
    We agree with this comment. We agree that measuring the tang length
inside of the roller housing is difficult because of the presence of
the rollers inside of the roller housing.
    We have changed the callouts in figure 4 to measure the tang length
from outside of the roller housing instead of from inside of the roller
housing. We have also changed the description of the tang measurement
in figure 4 to more accurately describe the measurement.

Request Detailed Description of Changes From AD 87-20-03 R2

    Robert J. Pasch requested we better describe the changes or added
steps to the inspections from AD 87-20-03 R2 so the owner/operator can
better understand the requirements of this new AD action.
    We agree with this comment. We retained all of the actions from the
previous AD and added steps to the inspection. This AD action must be
complied with in its entirety, not just the added steps. This AD action
includes better descriptions and graphics for the mechanic to follow
when complying with this AD. We have added language to the Discussion
section describing in more detail the changes we made in this
superseding AD action.

Request Different Requirements for New Seat Rail Installations

    Howard Greenberg requested different requirements for new seat rail
installations.
    We disagree with this comment. Documentation positively identifying
that all seat assemblies and associated parts were replaced would be
difficult to obtain. If documentation positively identifying
replacement of the seat assemblies and associated parts can be found,
the FAA will consider any applications we receive for an alternative
method of compliance to extend the compliance time for the initial
inspection.
    We have not changed this final rule AD action based on this
comments.

Request Training on Proper Seat Operation Instead of AD

    David Abler, Ken Anderson, and Timothy J. Berg requested we provide
a means to educate the pilots on proper operation of the seats rather
than take AD action.
    We disagree with this comment. Wear and damage can occur, which may
not be visibly recognizable by the pilot, and may cause the seat to
slip even after proper engagement of the locking pin. In addition, many
sources exist to educate those involved about this unsafe condition,
including Advisory Circular 43-16A, Aviation Maintenance Alerts, found
on the Internet at http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/Frameset?OpenPage; Special Aviation
Information Bulletin, SAIB CE-09-10, Availability of Secondary Seat
Stops for Pilot and Copilot Seats found on the Internet at http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgSAIB.nsf/Frameset?OpenPage; Safety Alerts for Operators, SAFO 10016, Missing or
Improper Seat Stops in Cessna Models found on the Internet at http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/airline_operators/airline_safety/safo/all_safos/; and other related articles in Cessna
Pilots Association Magazine. In spite of the sources of information
regarding the necessity for proper maintenance and proper operations of
the seats, inadvertent seat movement continues to be a safety issue.
    We have not changed this final rule AD action based on this
comment.

Request Requiring Reinspection After Repair or Replacement of Parts

    An anonymous commenter requested we require verifying the seat stop
pin engagement still meets the 0.150 inch criteria after replacement of
parts as a result of any of the required inspections.
    We disagree with this comment. The intent of this inspection is to
detect wear or deformation. Any part used as a replacement part must be
serviceable and not show signs of wear or deformation. Also, this
inspection is a repetitive inspection at intervals not to exceed every
100 hours time-in-service.
    We have not changed the final rule AD action based on this comment.

Agreement With AD Action

    John M. Conti agrees with this AD action. He states the added
procedures and criteria are good and must be done during annual
inspections so the extra detail is a small price to pay that will
further reduce this risk.
    We have not changed this final rule AD action based on this
comment.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the change described previously to change the tang length
measurement location to outside of the seat roller housing and minor
editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 36,000 airplanes in the U.S.
registry.
    The estimated total cost on U.S. operators includes the cumulative
costs associated with AD 87-20-03 R2. The required actions of this AD
are the same

as in AD 87-20-03 R2 with the exception of some added steps to the
inspection, which do not increase work-hours. The increased estimated
cost of this AD is due to increased labor cost and parts cost from 1987
when AD 87-20-03 R2 was issued.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
            Action                  Labor cost              Parts cost              product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections of the seat roller  1 work-hour x $85  Not applicable.............             $85       $3,060,000
 housings and seat rail.         per hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements
that would be required based on the results of the inspections. We have
no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these
replacements:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
               Action                        Labor cost                    Parts cost                 product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replace seat rail...................  2 work-hours x $85 per   $225 per rail....................            $395
                                       hour = $170 per rail.
Replace seat roller kit.............  2 work-hours per seat    $110.............................             280
                                       (less per leg) x $85
                                       per hour = $170.
Replace miscellaneous parts, such as  1 work-hour per seat x   $15..............................             100
 seat rollers, washers, bushings,      $85 per hour = $85.
 bolts, lock pin springs, etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
87-20-03 R2, Amendment 39-39-6669 (55 FR 36264, September 5, 1990;
published as Docket No. 86-CE-71-AD, Amdt. 39-6669), and adding the
following new AD:

2011-10-09 Cessna Aircraft Company: Amendment 39-16690; Docket No.
FAA-2010-1101; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-013-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective June 17,
2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 87-20-03 R2, Amendment 39-6669.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to all serial numbers of the following
Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna) Models that are certificated in any
category:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 Models
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) 150A, 150B, 150C, 150D, 150E, 150F, 150G, 150H, 150J, 150K, 150L,
 150M, A150K, A150L, A150M, F150F, F150G, F150H, F150J, F150K, F150L,
 F150M, FA150K, FA150L, FA150M, FRA150L, and FRA150M.
(2) 152, A152, F152, and FA152.
(3) 170, 170A, and 170B.

(4) 172, 172A, 172B, 172C, 172D, 172E, 172F (USAF T-41A), 172G, 172H
 (USAF T-41A), 172I, 172K, 172L, 172M, 172N, 172P, 172Q, 172RG, F172D,
 F172E, F172F, F172G, F172H, F172K, F172L, F172M, F172N, F172P, FR172E,
 FR172F, FR172G, FR172H, FR172J, FR172K, P172D, R172E (USAF T[dash]41B)
 (USAF T-41C and D), R172F (USAF T-41D), R172G (USAF T-41C or D), R172H
 (USAF T-41D), R172J, and R172K.
(5) 175, 175A, 175B, and 175C.
(6) 177, 177A, 177B, 177RG, and F177RG.
(7) 180, 180A, 180B, 180C, 180D, 180E, 180F, 180G, 180H, 180J, and 180K.
(8) 182, 182A, 182B, 182C, 182D, 182E, 182F, 182G, 182H, 182J, 182K,
 182L, 182M, 182N, 182P, 182Q, 182R, F182P, F182Q, FR182, R182, T182,
 and TR182.
(9) 185, 185A, 185B, 185C, 185D, 185E, A185E, and A185F.
(10) 188, 188A, A188, A188A, 188B, A188B, and T188C.
(11) 190.
(12) 195, 195A, and 195B.
(13) 206, P206, P206A, P206B, P206C, P206D, P206E, TP206A, TP206B,
 TP206C, TP206D, TP206E, TU206A, TU206B, TU206C, TU206D, TU206E, TU206F,
 TU206G, U206, U206A, U206B, U206C, U206D, U206E, U206F, and U206G.
(14) 207, 207A, T207, and T207A.
(15) 210, 210-5 (205), 210-5A (205A), 210A, 210B, 210C, 210D, 210E,
 210F, 210G, 210H, 210J, 210K, 210L, 210M, 210N, 210R, P210N, P210R,
 T210F, T210G, T210H, T210J, T210K, T210L, T210M, T210N, and T210R.
(16) T303.
(17) 336.
(18) 337, 337A, 337B, 337C, 337D, 337E, 337F, 337G, 337H, F337E, F337F,
 F337G, F337H, FT337E, FT337F, FT337GP, FT337HP, M337B, P337H, T337B,
 T337C, T337D, T337E, T337F, T337G, T337H, and T337H-SP.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject

    (d) Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport
Association (ATA) of America Code 51; Standard Practices Structures.

Unsafe Condition

    (e) This AD was prompted by reports of seats slipping on the
rails where the primary latch pin for the pilot/copilot seat is not
properly engaged in the seat rail/track and reports of the seat
roller housing departing the seat rail. We are issuing this AD to
prevent seat slippage or the seat roller housing from departing the
seat rail, which may consequently cause the pilot/copilot to be
unable to reach all the controls. This failure could lead to the
pilot/copilot losing control of the airplane.

Compliance

    (f) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

Actions

    (g) For all airplanes, to address the unsafe condition described
in paragraph (e) of this AD, you must do the following actions on
the seat rails; seat rollers, washers, and axle bolts or bushings;
seat roller housings and the tangs; and lock pin springs, unless
already done, initially within the next 100 hours time-in-service
(TIS) after the last inspection done following AD 87-20-03 R2 or
within the next 12 calendar months after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs first. Repetitively thereafter do the actions
at intervals not to exceed every 100 hours TIS or every 12 months,
whichever occurs first:
    (1) Visually inspect the pilot and copilot seat rails for dirt
and debris that may prevent engagement of the seat locking pins.
Before further flight, after any inspection where dirt or debris is
found, remove the dirt or debris found.
    (2) Remove the seat from the seat rail.
    (i) Remove the seat stops.
    (ii) Disengage seat belt/shoulder harness from the seat, if
necessary.
    (iii) Raise vertical adjusting seats to maximum height.
    (iv) Hold seat latches disengaged and slide the seat forward and
aft to disengage rollers.
    (v) Lift the seat out of the airplane.
    (3) Inspect the diameter of each seat locking pin engagement
hole in the pilot and copilot seat rails for excessive wear. Due to
wear on the rail surface at the hole opening, we allow this
measurement 0.020 of an inch below the surface of the rail. You must
take this measurement somewhere between the surface of the rail or
no more than 0.020 of an inch below the surface of the rail.
    (i) If the diameter of any of the holes is 0.42 of an inch or
more (see figure 1), before further flight, replace the rail.

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR13MY11.002

BILLING CODE 4910-13-C
    (ii) Rail replacement does not terminate the repetitive actions
required in paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (4) Visually inspect the seat rollers for flat spots and inspect
the rollers and washers for binding. Assure all rollers and washers,
which are meant to rotate, turn freely on their axles (or bushings
if installed).
    (i) Before further flight, replace any rollers with flat spots
and any worn washers.
    (ii) Before further flight, remove and clean the parts if there
is any binding between the bores of the rollers, washers, or axles.
    (iii) Do not lubricate the rollers, washers, or axles because
the lubricant will attract dust and other particles that may cause
binding.
    (5) Inspect the thickness of the tang (see figure 2 and figure
3). Due to wear of the tang chafing against the seat rail, measure
the tang thickness where the tang inner edges contact the seat rail.
    (i) If the tang thickness measures less than 0.05 of an inch,
before further flight replace the roller housing.
    (ii) Replacement of the roller housing does not terminate the
repetitive actions required in paragraph (g) of this AD.

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR13MY11.003

    (6) Due to wear or deformation of the tangs, inspect the tang
length from the inner edge of the tang to the outer edge (the bend
area) of the roller housing (see figure 4).
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR13MY11.004

    (i) The minimum measurement allowed for the remaining tang
length is 0.230 inches remaining on either of the tangs, from the
inner edge of the tang to the outer edge (the bend area) of the
roller housing. If the measurement is less than 0.230 inches on
either of the tangs, before further flight, replace the roller
housing.
    (ii) Replacement of the roller housing does not terminate the
repetitive actions required in paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (7) Inspect the springs that keep the lock pins in position in
the rail holes for positive engagement action. Before further
flight, replace any spring that does not provide positive
engagement.
    (8) Visually inspect the seat rails for cracks.
    (i) If there are seat rail cracks that exceed the crack criteria
in figure 5, before further flight, replace the seat rail.
    (ii) Replacement of the seat rail does not terminate the
repetitive actions required in paragraph (g) of this AD.

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR13MY11.005

    (9) Reinstall the seat on the seat rail.
    (i) Lift the seat into the airplane and place on the seat rail.
    (ii) Hold seat latches disengaged and slide the seat aft and
then forward to re-engage rollers.
    (iii) Lower vertical adjusting seats to a comfortable height.
    (iv) Reattach seat belt/shoulder harness to the seat, if
previously attached to the seat.
    (v) Reinstall the seat stops.
    (10) Lift up the forward edge of each seat to eliminate vertical
play of the seat locking pin in the engagement hole, and from this
position, inspect the depth of engagement of each seat locking pin
(see figure 2). If the rail is worn, this depth is measured from the
worn surface, not the manufactured surface.
    (i) If engagement of any of the seat locking pins measures less
than 0.15 of an inch, before further flight, replace or repair any
seat components necessary to achieve a seat pin engagement of a
minimum of 0.15 of an inch.
    (ii) Repair or replacement of necessary seat components does not
terminate the repetitive actions required in paragraph (g) of this
AD.

Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement

    (h) A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (i)(1) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) AMOCs approved for AD 87-20-03 R2 are approved for this AD.

Related Information

    (j) For more information about this AD, contact Gary Park,
Aerospace Engineer, ACE-118W, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Wichita, Kansas 67209;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April 27, 2011.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-10988 Filed 5-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 157 (Monday, August 15, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53929-53931]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19113]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0846, FRL-9950-41-Region 9]

Partial Stay; Arizona; Regional Haze Federal Implementation Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Partial stay.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is granting an
administrative stay of specific provisions of the Arizona Regional Haze
Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) applicable to the Phoenix Cement
Company (PCC) Clarkdale Plant and the CalPortland Company (CPC) Rillito
Plant under the Clean Air Act (CAA). In response to requests from PCC
and CPC, we are staying the effectiveness of control technology
optimization requirements for nitrogen oxides (NOX)
applicable to Kiln 4 at the Clarkdale Plant and Kiln 4 at the Rillito
Plant during the EPA's reconsideration of these requirements under CAA
section 307(d)(7)(B) for a period of 90 days. Today's action reflects
this stay in the Code of Federal Regulations.

DATES: Effective August 15, 2016, 40 CFR 52.145(k)(6) and Appendix A to
40 CFR 52.145 are stayed until November 14, 2016. The addition of 40
CFR 52.145(n) in this rule is also effective from August 15, 2016 until
November 14, 2016.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0846. All documents in the docket are
listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available electronically through http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colleen McKaughan, U.S. EPA, Region 9,
Air Division, Air-1, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.
Colleen McKaughan can be reached at telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER> and
via electronic mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. Administrative Stay
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    This section provides a brief overview of the background for
today's action. Please refer to our proposed action on reconsideration
for additional background.\1\ On September 3, 2014, the EPA promulgated
a FIP addressing certain requirements of the CAA and the EPA's Regional
Haze Rule for sources in Arizona.\2\ Among other things, the Arizona
Regional Haze FIP includes NOX emission limits achievable
with selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) applicable to Clarkdale
Kiln 4 and Rillito Kiln 4. In particular, the EPA established two
alternative emission limits for NOX on Clarkdale Kiln 4: A
2.12 lb/ton limit or an 810 tons/year limit. The lb/ton limit equates
to the installation of a SNCR system, based on a 50 percent control
efficiency, while the ton/year limit could be met either by installing
SNCR or by maintaining recent production levels. We set an emission
limit for NOX at Rillito Kiln 4 of 3.46 lb/ton, based on a
35 percent control efficiency. The FIP also includes monitoring,
recordkeeping, and reporting requirements and a compliance deadline for
the final NOX emission limits of December 31, 2018. Finally,
in response to comments alleging that SNCR control efficiencies of 50
percent for Clarkdale Kiln 4 and 35 percent for Rillito Kiln 4 were
unsupported and that SNCR was capable of achieving higher control
efficiencies, we established requirements for control technology
demonstrations (``optimization requirements'') for the SNCR systems at
both kilns, which would entail the collection of data that then could
be used to determine if a higher control efficiency was achievable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 81 FR 42600 (June 30, 2016).
    \2\ 79 FR 52420 (September 3, 2014)(Arizona Regional Haze
``Phase 3'' Rule).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    PCC and CPC each submitted a petition to the EPA on November 3,
2014, seeking administrative reconsideration and a partial stay of the
final FIP under CAA section 307(d)(7)(B) and the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA).\3\ In their petitions, both companies raised
multiple objections to the optimization requirements in the FIP. CPC
asserted that the requirements were burdensome, expensive, and
unnecessary, given that CPC had already ``evaluated fuels, fuel
fineness, and the other characteristics listed in the Optimization
Protocol'' as part of its effort to reduce energy usage.\4\ PCC stated
that the requirements ``would be burdensome to implement'' and ``would
substantially interfere with the cement manufacturing operations'' at
the Clarkdale Plant.\5\ PCC further asserted that requirements would
harm the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (SRPMIC), which
relies on revenue from the Clarkdale Plant.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Letter from Verle C. Martz, PCC, to Regina McCarthy, EPA
(November 3, 2014); Letter from Jay Grady, CPC, to Regina McCarthy,
EPA (November 3, 2014).
    \4\ Letter from Jay Grady, CPC, to Regina McCarthy, EPA
(November 3, 2014), attachment entitled ``Petition of CalPortland
Company for Partial Reconsideration and Request for Administrative
Stay of EPA Final Rule, Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation
Plans; Arizona; Regional Haze and Interstate Visibility Transport
Federal Implementation Plan Published at 79 FR 52420'' at 4.
    \5\ Letter from Verle C. Martz, PCC, to Regina McCarthy, EPA
(November 3, 2014) at 2.
    \6\ We note that while the Clarkdale Plant is tribally owned, it
is not located on tribal land. It is subject to State jurisdiction
and is regulated by ADEQ.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EPA sent letters to PCC and CPC on January 16, 2015 and January
27, 2015, respectively, granting reconsideration of the optimization
requirements pursuant to CAA section

307(d)(7)(B).\7\ However, the EPA did not act on the companies' request
for a stay of those requirements. On June 30, 2016, the EPA issued its
proposed action on reconsideration, proposing to replace the
optimization requirements for both kilns with a series of revised
recordkeeping and reporting requirements.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Letter from Jared Blumenfeld, EPA, to Verle C. Martz, PCC
(January 16, 2015); Letter from Jared Blumenfeld, EPA, to Jay Grady,
CPC (January 27, 2015).
    \8\ 81 FR 42600.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Administrative Stay

    In light of the EPA's proposed rule to replace the optimization
requirements applicable to Clarkdale Kiln 4 and Rillito Kiln 4 and the
fact that these provisions require implementation of various
operational adjustments and submittal of protocols and reports in
advance of the December 31, 2018 compliance deadline for the
NOX emission limits, the EPA is now granting PCC's and CPC's
petitions for a stay of the effectiveness of those requirements under
CAA section 307(d)(7)(B). In particular, we are staying the
effectiveness of 40 CFR 52.145(k)(6) and Appendix A to 40 CFR 52.145
for a period of 90 days, which is the maximum length of a stay
authorized under CAA section 307(d)(7)(B). The EPA anticipates that we
will complete final action on reconsideration prior to the conclusion
of this stay, but if we are unable to do so, we will consider granting
a further stay of the optimization requirements under section 705 of
the APA.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is exempt from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) because it applies to only two facilities and is therefore
not a rule of general applicability.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Burden is defined at
5 CFR 1320.3(b).

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    This action is not subject to the RFA. The RFA applies only to
rules subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the
APA, 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other statute. This rule is not subject to
the APA but is subject to the CAA, which does not require notice and
comment rulemaking to take this action.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or in the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    This action has tribal implications. However, it will neither
impose substantial direct compliance costs on federally recognized
tribal governments, nor preempt tribal law. This action stays the
effectiveness of optimization requirements that currently apply to the
PCC Clarkdale Plant. The profits from the Clarkdale Plant are used to
provide government services to SRPMIC's members.
    The EPA consulted with tribal officials under the EPA Policy on
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribes early in the process
of developing our proposed action on reconsideration of the
optimization requirements to permit them to have meaningful and timely
input into its development.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Summary of Consultation with SRPMIC Regarding Regional
Haze FIP Reconsideration (Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0846-0026).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    The EPA has determined that this proposed rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not
change the level of environmental protection for any affected
populations.

K. Congressional Review Act

    This rule is exempt from the CRA because it is a rule of particular
applicability.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen oxides, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Visibility.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: August 1, 2016.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.

    Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

 PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart D--Arizona

0
2. Amend Sec.  52.145 by adding paragraph (n) to read as follows:

Sec.  52.145  Visibility protection.

* * * * *
    (n) The effectiveness of paragraph (k)(6) of this section and
Appendix A to

this section is stayed from August 15, 2016 until November 14, 2016.

[FR Doc. 2016-19113 Filed 8-12-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 133 (Friday, July 10, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41617-41618]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14923]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3525-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]

Michigan; Emergency and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of an
emergency for the State of Michigan (FEMA-3525-EM), dated May 21, 2020,
and related determinations.

DATES: The declaration was issued May 21, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated May 21, 2020, the President issued an emergency declaration under
the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121-5207 (the Stafford Act), as follows:

    I have determined that the emergency conditions in certain areas
of the State of Michigan resulting from severe storms and flooding
beginning on May 16, 2020, and continuing, are of sufficient
severity and magnitude to warrant an emergency declaration under the
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42
U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (``the Stafford Act''). Therefore, I declare
that such an emergency exists in the State of Michigan.
    You are authorized to provide appropriate assistance for
required emergency measures, authorized under Title V of the
Stafford Act, to save lives and to protect property and public
health and safety, and to lessen or avert the threat of a
catastrophe in the designated areas. Specifically, you are
authorized to provide assistance for emergency protective measures
(Category B), limited to direct Federal assistance, under the Public
Assistance program.
    Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance be
supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Public Assistance will be limited to 75 percent of the total
eligible costs. In order to provide Federal assistance, you are
hereby authorized to allocate from funds available for these
purposes such amounts as you find necessary for Federal emergency
assistance and administrative expenses.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, Department
of Homeland Security, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, James K.
Joseph, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer
for this declared emergency.
    The following areas of the State of Michigan have been designated
as adversely affected by this declared emergency:

    Emergency protective measures (Category B), limited to direct
federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program for Midland
County.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-14923 Filed 7-9-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: June 18, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 117)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 34624]
[DOCID:fr18jn10-2]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0083; Airspace Docket No. 10-AAL-5]

Revocation of Class D and E Airspace; Big Delta, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final Rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action revokes Class D and E airspace at Big Delta, AK,
to eliminate duplicated controlled airspace serving Allen Army
Airfield. The FAA is taking this action to enhance safety and
management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at Allen Army
Airfield.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, September 23, 2010. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Rolf, AAL-538G, Federal Aviation
Administration, 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, Anchorage, AK 99513-7587;
telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet address: http://www.faa.gov/about/
office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/systemops/fs/
alaskan/rulemaking/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On Tuesday April 6, 2010, the FAA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register to revoke Class D and E airspace at
Big Delta, AK (75 FR 17322). Controlled airspace serving Allen Army
Airfield was revised in 2007 and correctly associated with the adjacent
town of Delta Junction. At that time it was not noticed that the Big
Delta, AK airspace description serving Allen Army Airfield was left in
place and should have been removed. This action removes the unnecessary
airspace associated with Big Delta, AK.
    Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
proceeding by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA.
No comments were received. The rule is adopted as proposed.
    The Class D surface areas are published in paragraph 5000 in FAA
Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed
August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E2 surface areas
are published in paragraph 6002 in FAA Order 7400.9T, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, signed August 27, 2009, and
effective September 15, 2009, which is incorporated by reference in 14
CFR 71.1. The Class E4 surface areas are published in paragraph 6004 in
FAA Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed
August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace areas
designated as 700/1,200 ft. transition areas are published in paragraph
6005 of FAA Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by revoking Class D and E airspace at Big Delta, AK, to remove
duplicate controlled airspace serving Allen Army Airfield.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Because this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart 1, Section 40103, Sovereignty and use of
airspace. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing
regulations to ensure the safe and efficient use of the navigable
airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because
it removes duplicate controlled airspace serving Allen Army Airfield
and represents the FAA's continuing effort to safely and efficiently
use the navigable airspace.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING
POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009, is
amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 General.

* * * * *

AAL AK D Big Delta, AK [Removed]

* * * * *

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

AAL AK E2 Big Delta, AK [Removed]

* * * * *

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as an Extension to
a Class D or Class E Surface Area.

* * * * *

AAL AK E4 Big Delta, AK [Removed]

* * * * *

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Extending Upward from 700 Feet or
More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AAL AK E5 Big Delta, AK [Removed]

    Issued in Anchorage, AK, on May 28, 2010.
Michael A. Tarr,
Acting Manager, Alaska Flight Services Information Area Group.
[FR Doc. 2010-14690 Filed 6-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 62852-62856]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24860]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2014-0300; FRL-9918-15-Region 7]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving the
State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of
Iowa for the purpose of approving the 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012, and 2013
updates to the Linn County Air Quality Ordinance. EPA is approving
Iowa's request to include revisions to the Linn County Air Quality
Ordinance, Chapter 10, because the revisions improve the stringency of
the Iowa SIP.

DATES: This direct final rule will be effective on December 22, 2014,
without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by November
20, 2014. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing
the public that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2014-0300, by one of the following methods:
    1. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Amy Algoe-Eakin, Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard,
Lenexa, Kansas 66219.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-
2014-0300. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or
email information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected.
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically captured and included as part of
the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch,
11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30
excluding legal holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine
these documents should make an appointment with the office at least 24
hours in advance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Algoe-Eakin, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219, at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by
addressing the following:

I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
III. What action is EPA taking?

What is being addressed in this document?

    The Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) requests EPA's
approval of the 2008, 2009, 2010, 2012, and 2013 revisions to the Linn
County Air Quality Ordinance, Chapter 10, as a revision to the Iowa
SIP. All changes were adopted by the Linn County Board of Supervisors
for each of the years addressed with this action. Pursuant to a request
from IDNR \1\, EPA is taking action on the 2008, 2009, 2010, 2013 and
2013 revisions to the Linn County Air Quality Ordinance to the extent
they are contained in the 2013 version of the Linn County Air Quality
Ordinance. See the Technical Support Document in the docket for today's
action for further information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See letter from Catharine Fitzsimmons, Chief of the Air
Quality Bureau of IDNR to Karl Brooks, Regional Administrator of EPA
Region 7, dated August 15, 2014, available in the Docket for today's
action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following is a description of the 2008 revisions to the Linn
County Air Quality Ordinance, Chapter 10, which are subject to this
approval action and consistent with the Federally-approved state rules:
    The following definitions are being added to the Linn County Air
Quality Ordinance, Chapter 10.2 ``Definitions'': ASME, ASTM, Attainment
area, Biodiesel fuel, Btu, Carbonaceous fuel, Criteria, Department,
Diesel fuel, DNR, Electric furnace, Emission Unit, EPA conditional
method, EPA reference method, Equipment, Excess air, Excess emission,
Foundry cupola, Gas cleaning device, Goal, Heating value, IAC,
Initiation of construction, installation or alteration, Level, New
Source Performance Standards, Nonattainment area, Number 1 fuel oil/
Number 2 fuel oil, Objective, Plan documents, PM10,

PM2.5, Privileged Communication, Process, Salvage
operations, Smoke Monitor, Source operation, Standard metropolitan
statistical area, Theoretical air, 12-month rolling period, Untreated,
and Urban area.
    The following definitions are being changed in the Linn County Air
Quality Ordinance, Chapter 10.2, ``Definitions'' to improve the
stringency of the Iowa SIP: Air Pollution Control Officer, Air quality
standard, Air pollution forecast, Country grain elevator, Major
Stationary Source, Potential to Emit, Prevention of Significant
Deterioration, Process weight rate, Responsible official, Significant,
State Implementation Plan, Total Suspended Particles, Volatile Organic
Compounds.
    ``Air Quality Division'' or ``Air Pollution Control Agency'' was
deleted from the 2008 submittal.
    Chapter 10.5 addresses ``Locally Required Permits.'' Changes in
2008 include a revision to 10.5(2) to strengthen the rules for
Authorization to Install; two paragraphs are being added to 10.5(2)(a)
for additional permit requirements; an administrative change is being
made to 10.5(2)(b), and 10.5(2)(d) is being added to outline
requirements for issuance of a permit. Note that EPA has not approved
the local permit program with regard to permits for major sources.
Major source permits (Prevention of Significant Deterioration) are
issued by IDNR.
    ``Duration of Permit'' is addressed in 10.5(3). This 2008 revision
to 10.5(3)(c-d) states permits can be renewed yearly but are subject to
10.6--Permitting Fees--of the ordinance. The rules to post the permit
are being revised for additional detail and clarity.
    ``Exemptions from the Authorization to Install Permit and Permit to
Operate Requirements,'' (10.5(9)) was revised in 2008, 2009, 2010 and
2011, and lists 37 exemptions too numerous to mention here. For the
entire list, refer to the technical support document located in the
docket for this rulemaking. These revisions are consistent with the
Federally-approved state rules.
    Administrative changes were made to 10.5(10-11), ``Emissions
Offsets for Non-Attainment Designated Areas,'' and ``Dispersion Credit
Allowance,'' in 2008.
    Chapter 10.6 addresses permit fees and is being revised at 10.6(3)
to include late filing fees for each permit and permit renewal. A
revision being made to 10.6(4) states the fees are established by
resolution by the County.
    The titles for 10.9 and 10.9(1) were revised in 2008 to read
``Emission Standards,'' and 10.9(1) ``Emissions of Particulate
Matter.''
    ``Grain Handling and Processing Plants,'' 10.9(1)(g), is being
revised to add three sub-sections to address the limit of particulate
matter discharged to the atmosphere, and addresses grain bin vents
constructed, modified or reconstructed before and after March 31, 2008.
These revisions are consistent with the Federally-approved state rules.
    Grammatical changes are being made to 10.9(1)(l) ``Incinerator'',
and the opacity for visible emissions from an incinerator is being
revised to reduce opacity from sixty percent to forty percent which
strengthens the rule to protect air quality. The state requested this
Chapter be added in to the 111(d) plan which is being accomplished with
this rulemaking.
    Chapter 10.10 of the Linn County Air Quality Ordinance sets forth
rules for ``Open Burning.'' In addition to grammatical corrections,
this 2008 revision addresses the issuance, validity, and revisions to
open burning permits, as well as clarifying the circumstances for
burning landscape wastes, and adds fire extinguisher training to open
burning exemptions. This revision adds that open burning of residential
waste, landscape wastes and leaves, within one-half mile of Cedar
Rapids, Hiawatha or Marion, Iowa, is not allowed as of January 1, 2009.
Revisions to open burning rules are consistent with Federally-approved
state rules.
    Chapter 10.13, ``Fugitive Dust'', was revised in 2008 at
10.13(1)(6) to add an additional precaution to prevent fugitive dust by
reducing the speed of vehicles traveling over on-property surfaces as
necessary to minimize the generation of airborne dusts. These revisions
are consistent with Federally-approved state rules.
    Chapter 10.16 ``Circumvention'' is being revised to add evidence
used in establishing that a violation has or is occurring. Information
from the use of a monitoring method pursuant to 10.5, compliance test
methods pursuant to 10.17, or testing and monitoring methods pursuant
to 10.5 is being added. Presumptive credible testing (monitoring or
testing methods, other testing, monitoring or other information-
gathering methods comparable to 10.16(1) ``a'') are being added to this
rule. These revisions are consistent with Federally-approved state
rules.
    Chapter 10.17, ``Testing and Sampling of New and Existing
Equipment,'' is revised to renumber/reorder sections within the rule.
Additional revisions to this section include 10.17(1) ``Continuous
Monitoring of Opacity from Coal-Fire Steam Generating Units''; 10.17
sections 2 and 3 are reserved; 10.17(4) ``Continuous Monitoring of
Sulfur Dioxide from Sulfuric Acid Plants''; 10.17(8) ``Tests by
Department.''
    Chapter 10.20 is renamed ``Public Records and Fair Information
Practices'' and describes that information received will be publicly
available or be granted confidential treatment in accordance with the
IAC, and reproduction services will be rendered at the rate established
by the Linn County Board of Health.
    The following is a description of the 2009 revisions to the Linn
County Air Quality Ordinance, Chapter 10, which are subject to this
approval action:
    The definition of ``significant'' is revised in the Linn County Air
Quality Ordinance, Chapter 10.2, ``Definitions.'' \2\
    Table 1 of Chapter 10.9 is revised to remove the phrase ``or more''
after the process weight rate lb/hr 6,000,000, and tons/hr 3,000.00.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Pursuant to an email dated September 18, 2014, from
Catharine Fitzsimmons, Air Quality Bureau Chief of IDNR, to Joshua
Tapp, Chief of the Air Planning and Development Branch of EPA Region
7, IDNR requests that EPA take no action on the definition of
``Significant'' as it relates to PM2.5 and it is
therefore not included in today's action. See Docket for further
information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Chapter 10.17, ``Testing and Sampling of New and Existing
Equipment,'' is revised to add (7) ``Tests by Owner'' for new, modified
or existing equipment.
    The following is a description of the 2011 revisions to the Linn
County Air Quality Ordinance, Chapter 10, which are subject to this
approval action:
    The definition of ``Volatile organic compound'' is added to the
Linn County Air Quality Ordinance, Chapter 10.2.
    Chapter 10.6(2), ``Annual Fee for Permit to Operate,'' was revised
in 2012 to state renewal fees will be paid by the invoice due date or
the permit will expire and not be valid.
    The following is a description of the 2012 revisions to the Linn
County Air Quality Ordinance, Chapter 10, which are subject to this
approval action:
    Chapter 10.6(1), ``Permit Fees,'' was revised in 2013 to correct a
grammatical error.
    Chapter 10.10 of the Linn County Air Quality Ordinance sets forth
rules for ``Open Burning.'' Revisions are made to 10.10(A)(1)(h-i),
``Trees and Tree Trimmings,'' and ``Other,'' respectively. ``Other''
includes native prairie management on a case-by-case basis as allowed
by permit and issued by the Air Pollution Control Officer.
    The following is a description of the 2013 revisions to the Linn
County Air Quality Ordinance, Chapter 10, which are subject to this
approval action:
    Chapter 10.1, ``Purpose and Ambient Air Quality Standards,'' was
revised in

2013 to amend the Federal references to be consistent with state rules
that are Federally-approved.
    The following definitions are revised in the Linn County Air
Quality Ordinance, Chapter 10.2, ``Definitions'' and are consistent
with state rules that are Federally-approved: EPA reference method,
PM10, PM2.5, and Total suspended particulate.
    Chapter 10.5 addresses ``Locally Required Permits.'' The 2013
Revision to 10.5(6), ``Transfer of Permits,'' adds written notification
delivery methods to be consistent with Federally-approved state rules,
and reduces the number of days for notification from 30 to 14 when
transferring portable equipment.
    Chapter 10.17, ``Testing and Sampling of New and Existing
Equipment,'' is being revised at 10.17(5) ``Maintenance of Records of
Continuous Monitors,'' for administrative changes, and at 10.17(6)
``Reporting of Continuous Monitoring Information.'' 10.17(6)
strengthened the reporting requirements and is consistent with
Federally-approved state rules.
    Changes to 10.17(9) ``Methods and Procedures'' include revisions
for performance test (stack tests), continuous monitoring systems, and
permit and compliance demonstration requirements to include the most
recent analytical reference methods to be consistent with Federally-
approved state rules.
    Changes to 10.17(10) and (11) remove references to specific
processes in this chapter making the rules more stringent, as all
processes are included in the revision. Changes to 10.17(12) include
the most recent revision to the EPA reference method to be Federally-
approved state rules.
    The following is a list of definitions and rules which are not
being approved as part of the EPA-approved SIP:
    10.2 ``Definitions''; definition of Anaerobic Lagoon, definition of
Biomass, definition of Federally-Enforceable, definition of Greenhouse
Gas, definition of Major Modification, definition of Maximum Achievable
Control Technology (MACT), and the definition of MACT Floor. (The
definition of ``Significant'' is approved. However, the state of Iowa
has withdrawn their request to included PM2.5 in the
definition of ``significant.'') 10.4-1, Title V Permits; 10.5(9) ``b''
Locally Required Permits; Exemptions from the Authorization to Install
Permit to Operate Requirements;
    10.8(2) ``b'' Emissions From Fuel-Burning Equipment; Emission
Limitation; 10.8(3) Emissions From Fuel-Burning Equipment; Exemptions
for Residential Heaters Burning Solid Fuels; 10.8(4) Emissions from
Fuel-Burning Equipment; Nuisance Conditions for Fuel Burning Equipment;
10.9(2), New Source Performance Standards (NSPS); 10.9(3), Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs); 10.9(4), Emission
Standards for HAPs for Source Categories; 10.10(4), Variance from
Rules; 10.11, Emission of Objectionable Odors; 10.15, Variances;
10.17(13), Continuous Emissions from Acid Rain, and 10.24, Penalty.

II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?

    The state submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In
addition, as explained above and in more detail in the technical
support document which is part of this document, the revision meets the
substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.

III. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is taking action on the 2008, 2009, 2010, 2013 and 2013
revisions to the Linn County Air Quality Ordinance and is approving
those revisions to the extent they are contained in the 2013 version of
the Linn County Air Quality Ordinance. These revisions will improve the
stringency of the SIP.
    We are taking direct final action to approve revisions because they
are routine changes to the existing rules which are noncontroversial.
Therefore, we do not anticipate any adverse comments. However, in the
``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal Register, we are publishing
a separate document that will serve as the proposed rule if adverse
comments are received on this direct final rule. We will not institute
a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in
commenting must do so at this time. For further information about
commenting on this rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this document.

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the terms
of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is
therefore not subject to review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
(76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in

the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days
after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by December 22, 2014. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Administrative
practice and procedure, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental
relations, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.

    Dated: September 30, 2014.
Rebecca Weber,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
    Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart Q--Iowa

0
2. In Sec.  52.820 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry for ``Chapter 10'' under the heading ``Linn County'' to read
as follows:

Sec.  52.820  Identification of Plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                                              EPA-Approved Iowa Regulations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  State
           Iowa  citation                      Title            effective     EPA  approval  date                        Explanation
                                                                   date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Commission [567]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                      * * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                       Linn County
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 10..........................  Linn County Air Quality      7/24/13  10/21/14 [Insert        The following definitions are not SIP-approved in
                                       Ordinance, Chapter 10.                Federal Register        Chapter 10.2; Anaerobic lagoon, Biomass, Chemical
                                                                             citation].              processing plants (ethanol production facilities
                                                                                that produce ethanol by natural fermentation
                                                                                included in NAICS code 325193 or 312140 are not
                                                                                included in this definition);
                                                                                Federally Enforceable; Greenhouse gases; Maximum
                                                                                Achievable Control Technology (MACT); MACT floor;
                                                                                Major modification; Significant is approved,
                                                                                however, PM2.5 is not included in the definition of
                                                                                ``significant.'' The following sections are not SIP
                                                                                approved: 10.4(1), Title V Permits; 10.5(9) ``b''
                                                                                Locally Required Permits; Exemptions from the
                                                                                Authorization to Install Permit to Operate
                                                                                Requirements; 10.8(2) ``b'' Emissions From Fuel-
                                                                                Burning Equipment; Emission Limitation; 10.8(3)
                                                                                Emissions From Fuel-Burning Equipment; Exemptions
                                                                                for Residential Heaters Burning Solid Fuels;
                                                                                10.8(4) Emissions from Fuel-Burning Equipment;
                                                                                Nuisance Conditions for Fuel Burning Equipment;
                                                                                10.9(2), NSPS; 10.9(3), Emission Standards for
                                                                                HAPs; 10.9(4), Emission Standards for HAPs for
                                                                                Source Categories; 10.10(4) Variance from rules;
                                                                                10.11, Emission of Objectionable Odors; 10.15,
                                                                                Variances, 10.17(13) Continuous Emissions
                                                                                Monitoring from Acid Rain Program, and 10.24,
                                                                                Penalty.

                                                                      * * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-24860 Filed 10-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68514-68516]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21897]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2023-1830; Airspace Docket No. 23-ASW-06]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of United States Area Navigation (RNAV) Routes; Eastern
United States

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend two United States Area
Navigation (RNAV) Q-routes in the eastern United States. This action
supports the Little Rock, AR (LIT), Very High Frequency Omnidirectional
Range/Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC) Relocation Project, and NextGen
which provides a modern RNAV route structure to improve the efficiency
of the National Airspace System (NAS).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 20, 2023

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by FAA Docket No. FAA-2023-1830 and
Airspace Docket No. 23-ASW-06 using any of the following methods:
    * Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your comments electronically.
    * Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    * Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
    * Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of
the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11H, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. You may also contact the Rules and
Regulations Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Vidis, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it amends the route structure to maintain the efficient
flow of air traffic within the NAS.

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites interested persons to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal. The most
helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain
the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters
should submit only one time if comments are filed electronically, or
commenters should send only one copy of written comments if comments
are filed in writing.
    The FAA will file in the docket all comments it receives, as well
as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this
proposal, the FAA will consider all comments it receives on or before
the closing date for comments. The FAA will consider comments filed
after the comment period has closed if it is possible to do so without
incurring expense or delay. The FAA may change this proposal in light
of the comments it receives.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system
of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.

Availability of Rulemaking Documents

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at
www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Operations office (see ADDRESSES section for address, phone number, and
hours of

operations). An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the Eastern Service Center, Federal
Aviation Administration, Room 210, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park,
GA 30337.

Incorporation by Reference

    United States Area Navigation routes are published in paragraph
2006 of FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 on an annual
basis. This document proposes to amend the current version of that
order, FAA Order JO 7400.11H, dated August 11, 2023, and effective
September 15, 2023. These updates would be published in the next update
to FAA Order JO 7400.11. That order is publicly available as listed in
the ADDRESSES section of this document.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11H lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas,
air traffic service routes, and reporting points.

Background

    This action is proposed due to the Little Rock, AR (LIT), VORTAC
relocation project. The Little Rock VORTAC is planned to be relocated
approximately nine miles north of its current location. The LITTR, AR,
Waypoint (WP) is an already established waypoint located approximately
60.3 feet northeast of the Little Rock VORTAC's current location.
Replacing Little Rock VORTAC with the LITTR, WP on Q-33 and Q-66 would
allow for greater connectivity to the existing RNAV route structure
that already merges at the LITTR, WP.
    Houston Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) requested Q-33
extend south from DHART, AR, Fix to the Humble, TX (IAH), VORTAC. This
route segment would overlay a portion of J-180. This proposed amended
route segment would allow for greater connectivity to the existing RNAV
route structure and procedures in the Houston, TX area.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 to amend RNAV
routes Q-33, and Q-66 to support the Little Rock, AR (LIT), VORTAC
Relocation Project, the FAA's NextGen program, which provides a modern
RNAV route structure to improve the efficiency of the NAS, and to
remove route points that are not required in the route descriptions.
    Q-33: Q-33 currently extends between the DHART, AR, Fix to the
PROWL, MO, WP. This action proposes to extend the route to the south to
overlay a portion of jet route J-180 from the DHART, AR, Fix to the
Humble, TX (IAH), VORTAC. This action also proposes to replace the
Little Rock, AR (LIT), VORTAC with the LITTR, AR, WP which located 60.3
feet northeast of Little Rock VORTAC's current location.
    Q-66: Q-66 currently extends between the Little Rock, AR (LIT),
VORTAC and the ALEAN, VA, WP. This action proposes to replace the
Little Rock VORTAC with the LITTR, AR, WP which is located 60.3 feet
northeast of Little Rock VORTAC's current location. This action also
proposes to remove route points from the route description which
constitute a turn of one degree or less. The FAA proposes to remove the
following route points: CIVKI, AR, WP; RICKX, AR, WP; TROVE, TN, WP;
BAZOO, TN, WP; and MXEEN, TN, WP

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11H, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 11,
2023, and effective September 15, 2023, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 2006 United States Area Navigation Routes.

* * * * *

Q-33 Humble, TX (IAH) to PROWL, MO [Amended]

Humble, TX (IAH)                                VORTAC                         (Lat. 29[deg]57'24.90'' N, long. 095[deg]20'44.59'' W)
Daisetta, TX (DAS)                              VORTAC                         (Lat. 30[deg]11'22.96'' N, long. 094[deg]38'41.94'' W)
Sawmill, LA (SWB)                               VOR/DME                        (Lat. 31[deg]58'23.50'' N, long. 092[deg]40'37.52'' W)
LITTR, AR                                       WP                             (Lat. 34[deg]40'39.90'' N, long. 092[deg]10'49.26'' W)
PROWL, MO                                       WP                             (Lat. 37[deg]02'00.00'' N, long. 091[deg]15'00.00'' W)

                                                                      * * * * * * *
Q-66 LITTR, AR to ALEAN, VA [Amended]

LITTR, AR                                       WP                             (Lat. 34[deg]40'39.90'' N, long. 092[deg]10'49.26'' W)
METWO, TN                                       WP                             (Lat. 36[deg]04'22.44'' N, long. 085[deg]18'38.04'' W)
ALEAN, VA                                       WP                             (Lat. 36[deg]43'54.67'' N, long. 081[deg]37'26.18'' W)

* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 28, 2023.
Karen L. Chiodini,
Acting Manager, Rules and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2023-21897 Filed 10-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 56 (Tuesday, March 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15653]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06800]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

 In the Matter of Longhai Steel, Inc., Order of Suspension of
Trading

March 20, 2015.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Longhai Steel, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since
the period ended September 30, 2012.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is ordered,
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that
trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for
the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on March 20, 2015, through 11:59 p.m. EDT
on April 2, 2015.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-06800 Filed 3-20-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P