[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 19, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27031-27034]
[FR Doc No: 2021-10463]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0973; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01113-T;
Amendment 39-21527; AD 2021-09-13]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; ATR-GIE Avions de Transport
R[eacute]gional Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directives (AD) 2000-23-
04 R1 and AD 2018-20-14, which applied to certain ATR-GIE Avions de
Transport R[eacute]gional Model ATR42-500 airplanes. AD 2000-23-04 R1
and AD 2018-20-14 required revising the maintenance or inspection
program, as applicable, to incorporate new and/or more restrictive
maintenance requirements and airworthiness limitations. This AD
requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate new or more restrictive airworthiness
limitations; as specified in a European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD, which is incorporated by reference. This AD was prompted by
the FAA's determination that new or more restrictive airworthiness
limitations are necessary. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective June 23, 2021.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of June 23,
2021.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain other publications listed in this AD as of
November 20, 2018 (83 FR 52123, October 16, 2018).

ADDRESSES: For EASA material incorporated by reference (IBR) in this
AD, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 8999 000; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA website
at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. For ATR-GIE service information
identified in this AD, contact ATR--GIE Avions de Transport
R[eacute]gional, 1 All[eacute]e Pierre Nadot, 31712 Blagnac Cedex,
France; telephone +33 (0) 5 62 21 62 21; fax +33 (0) 5 62 21 67 18;
email [email protected] aircraft.com; http://www.atr-
aircraft.com. You may view this IBR material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2020-0973.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching fMonday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, any comments
received, and other information. The address for Docket Operations is
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-
3220; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2020-0263, dated December 1, 2020
(EASA AD 2020-0263) (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or the MCAI), to correct an unsafe condition
for all Model ATR 42-400 and ATR 42-500 airplanes. Model ATR 42-400
airplanes are not certificated by the FAA and are not included on the
U.S. type certificate data sheet; this AD therefore does not include
those airplanes in the applicability. Airplanes with an original
airworthiness certificate or original export certificate of
airworthiness issued after July 7, 2020 must comply with the
airworthiness limitations specified as part of the approved type design
and referenced on the type certificate data sheet; this AD therefore
does not include those airplanes in the applicability.
    The FAA issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM)
to amend 14 CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2000-23-04 R1, Amendment 39-
12174 (66 FR 19381, April 16, 2001) (AD 2000-23-04 R1) and AD 2018-20-
14, Amendment 39-19448 (83 FR 52123, October 16, 2018) (AD 2018-20-14).
ADs 2000-23-04 R1 and 2018-20-14 applied to certain ATR-GIE Avions de
Transport R[eacute]gional Model ATR42-500 airplanes. The SNPRM
published in the Federal Register on February 24, 2021 (86 FR 11169).
The FAA preceded the SNPRM with a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
that published in the Federal Register on October 29, 2020 (85 FR
68503). The NPRM was prompted by the FAA's determination that new or
more restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. The NPRM
proposed to require revising the existing maintenance or inspection
program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more restrictive
airworthiness limitations. The SNPRM proposed to require revising the
existing

maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or
more restrictive airworthiness limitations, as specified in EASA AD
2020-0263.
    The FAA is issuing this AD to address reduced structural integrity
of the airplane. See the MCAI for additional background information.

Comments

    The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule. The FAA received no comments on the SNPRM
or on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety
and the public interest require adopting this final rule as proposed,
except for minor editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these
minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
SNPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the SNPRM.
    The FAA also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2020-0263 describes new or more restrictive airworthiness
limitations for airplane structures and safe life limits.
    This AD also requires the following service information, which the
Director of the Federal Register approved for incorporation by
reference as of November 20, 2018 (83 FR 52123, October 16, 2018).
     ATR ATR42-400/-500, Time Limits Document (TL), Revision
11, dated May 5, 2015.
     ATR ATR42-400/-500 Time Limits Temporary Revision TR01/17,
dated May 3, 2017.
    This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 9 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
    The FAA estimates the total cost per operator for the retained
actions from AD 2018-20-14 to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-
hour).
    The FAA has determined that revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator,
although the agency recognizes that this number may vary from operator
to operator. Since operators incorporate maintenance or inspection
program changes for their affected fleet(s), the FAA has determined
that a per-operator estimate is more accurate than a per-airplane
estimate.
    The FAA estimates the total cost per operator for the new actions
to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-hour).

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2000-23-04R1, Amendment 39-
12174 (66 FR 19381, April 16, 2001); and AD 2018-20-14, Amendment 39-
19448 (83 FR 52123, October 16, 2018); and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:

2021-09-13 ATR-GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional: Amendment
39-21527; Docket No. FAA-2020-0973; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-
01113-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective June 23, 2021.

(b) Affected ADs

    (1) This AD replaces AD 2000-23-04R1, Amendment 39-12174 (66 FR
19381, April 16, 2001) (AD 2000-23-04R1); and AD 2018-20-14,
Amendment 39-19448 (83 FR 52123, October 16, 2018) (AD 2018-20-14).
    (2) This AD affects AD 2008-04-19 R1, Amendment 39-16069 (74 FR
56713, November 3, 2009) (AD 2008-04-19 R1); and AD 2015-26-09,
Amendment 39-18357 (81 FR 1483, January 13, 2016) (AD 2015-26-09).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to ATR-GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional
Model ATR42-500 airplanes, certificated in any category, with an
original airworthiness certificate or original export certificate of
airworthiness dated on or before July 7, 2020.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05, Time Limits/
Maintenance Checks.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a determination that new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. The FAA is
issuing this AD to prevent reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision, With Changes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2018-20-14, with revised figure designation and reference. For
airplanes with an original airworthiness

certificate or original export certificate of airworthiness dated on
or before May 3, 2017: Within 90 days after November 20, 2018 (the
effective date of AD 2018-20-14), revise the maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate the information
specified in ATR ATR42-400/-500, Time Limits Document (TL), Revision
11, dated May 5, 2015; and ATR ATR42-400/-500 Time Limits Temporary
Revision TR01/17, dated May 3, 2017. The initial compliance time for
accomplishing the tasks is at the applicable times specified in ATR
ATR42-400/-500, Time Limits Document (TL), Revision 11, dated May 5,
2015; and ATR ATR42-400/-500 Time Limits Temporary Revision TR01/17,
dated May 3, 2017; or within 90 days after November 20, 2018;
whichever occurs later, except for those certification maintenance
requirements (CMRs) tasks identified in figure 1 to paragraph (g) of
this AD.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR19MY21.002

(h) Retained Initial Compliance Times for Certain CMR Tasks, With
Changes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2018-20-14, with revised figure references. For the CMR tasks listed
in figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD, the initial compliance time
for accomplishing the tasks is at the applicable time specified in
ATR ATR42-400/-500 Time Limits Temporary Revision TR01/17, dated May
3, 2017; or within the compliance time specified in figure 1 to
paragraph (g) of this AD; whichever occurs later.

(i) Retained Restrictions on Alternative Actions, Intervals, and
Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs), With a New
Exception.

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD
2018-20-14, with a new exception. Except as required by paragraph
(j) of this AD, after the maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, has been revised as required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, and/or
CDCCLs may be used unless the actions, intervals, and/or CDCCLs are
approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (n)(1) of this AD.

(j) New Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision

    Except as specified in paragraph (k) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2020-0263, dated December 1, 2020 (EASA AD 2020-0263). Accomplishing
the maintenance or inspection program revision required by this
paragraph terminates the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD.

(k) Exceptions to EASA AD 2020-0263

    (1) The requirements specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of EASA
AD 2020-0263 do not apply to this AD.
    (2) Paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2020-0263 specifies revising ``the
approved AMP [Aircraft Maintenance Program]'' within 12 months after
its effective date, but this AD requires revising the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, within 90 days
after the effective date of this AD.
    (3) The initial compliance time for doing the tasks specified in
paragraph (3) of EASA 2020-0263 is at the applicable ``thresholds''
as incorporated by the requirements of paragraph (3) of EASA AD
2020-0263, or within 90 days after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
    (4) The provisions specified in paragraphs (4) and (5) of EASA
AD 2020-0263 do not apply to this AD.
    (5) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2020-0263 does not apply
to this AD.

(l) New Provisions for Alternative Actions, Intervals, and CDCCLs

    After the maintenance or inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (j) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections), intervals, and CDCCLs are allowed unless they are
approved as specified in the provisions of the ``Ref. Publications''
section of EASA AD 2020-0263.

(m) Terminating Action for Other ADs

    Accomplishing the actions required by paragraph (g) or (j) of
this AD terminates all requirements of the ADs specified in
paragraphs (m)(1) and (2) of this AD for ATR-GIE Avions de Transport
R[eacute]gional Model ATR42-500 airplanes only.
    (1) AD 2008-04-19 R1.
    (2) AD 2015-26-09.

(n) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, send it
to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (o) of this
AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (i) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (ii) AMOCs approved previously for AD 2018-20-14 are approved as
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of EASA AD 2020-0263 that are
required by paragraph (j) of this AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or ATR-GIE
Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional's EASA Design Organization
Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include
the DOA-authorized signature.

(o) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Shahram Daneshmandi,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone
and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

(p) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
June 23, 2021.
    (i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2020-0263,
dated December 1, 2020.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (4) The following service information was approved for IBR on
November 20, 2018 (83 FR 52123, October 16, 2018).
    (i) ATR ATR42-400/-500, Time Limits Document (TL), Revision 11,
dated May 5, 2015.
    (ii) ATR ATR42-400/-500 Time Limits Temporary Revision TR01/17,
dated May 3, 2017.
    (5) For EASA AD 2020-0263, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
    (6) For ATR-GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional material,
contact ATR-GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional, 1 All[eacute]e
Pierre Nadot, 31712 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 (0) 5 62 21
62 21; fax +33 (0) 5 62 21 67 18; email [email protected]
aircraft.com; http://www.atr-aircraft.com.
    (7) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. This material may be found in the AD
docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0973.
    (8) You may view this material that is incorporated by reference
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on April 22, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-10463 Filed 5-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Authors The primary authors of this report were Gregory J. Bryant, Fishery Biologist, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Region, and Jim Lynch, Fishery Biologist, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Region. 54 Table 1. Summary of Factors Affecting Each Steelhead ESU Name of ESU Geographic Range of ESU Factors Affecting ESU 1) Puget Sound Strait of Juan De Fuca, Puget Sound, and Hood Canal, WA. ! Habitat blockages ! Hatchery introgression ! Urbanization ! Logging ! Hydropower development ! Harvest 2) Olympic Peninsula West of Elwha River and south to, but not including, Grays Harbor drainage, WA. ! Hatchery introgression ! Logging ! Minor habitat blockages ! Hydropower development ! Harvest 3) Southwest Washington Grays Harbor drainage, WA to Columbia River below Cowlitz River, WA and below Willamette River, OR. ! Hatchery introgression ! Logging ! Agriculture ! Harvest ! Hydropower ! Predation 4) Lower Columbia River Columbia River and tributaries between Cowlitz and Wind Rivers in WA, Willamette and Hood Rivers in OR. ! Hatchery introgression ! Habitat blockages ! Logging ! Eruption of Mt. Saint Helens ! Hydropower development ! Predation ! Harvest 5) Upper Willamette River Willamette River, OR upstream from Willamette Falls. ! Urbanization ! Logging ! Habitat blockages ! Predation ! Agriculture ! Harvest 6) Oregon Coast Oregon coast north of Cape Blanco, OR excluding Columbia River tributaries. ! Logging ! Hatchery introgression ! Agriculture ! Minor habitat blockages ! Historic flooding ! Harvest 55 Table 1. Summary of Factors Affecting Each Steelhead ESU ( continued)

Name of ESU Geographic Range of ESU Factors Affecting ESU 7) Klamath Mountains Province Elk River, OR to Klamath and Trinity Rivers in CA. ! Hatchery introgression ! Logging ! Water diversion\ extraction ! Habitat blockages ! Poaching ! Agriculture ! Hydropower development ! Historic flooding ! Mining 8) Northern California Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, CA to Gualala River, CA. ! Historic Flooding ! Predation ! Water diversion\ extraction ! Minor habitat blockages ! Poaching ! Logging ! Agriculture ! Mining 9) Central California Coast Russian River, CA to Soquel Creek and the drainages of San Francisco and San Pablo Bays, CA; excluded is the Sacramento/ San Joaquin River Basin. ! Water diversion\ extraction ! Habitat blockages ! Agriculture ! Logging ! Historic flooding ! Hatchery introgression ! Poaching ! Mining ! Urban development ! Harvest 10) South/ Central California Coast Pajaro River, CA to north of the Santa Maria River, CA. ! Urbanization ! Water diversion\ extraction ! Historic flooding ! Habitat blockages ! Agriculture ! Poaching ! Harvest 11) Southern California Santa Maria River, CA to southern extent of species range. ! Water diversion\ extraction ! Habitat blockages ! Urbanization ! Agriculture ! Harvest 56 Table 1. Summary of Factors Affecting Each Steelhead ESU ( continued)

Name of ESU Geographic Range of ESU Factors Affecting ESU 12) Central Valley Sacramento River, CA and San Joaquin River, CA. ! Water diversion\ extraction ! Mining ! Agriculture ! Urbanization ! Habitat blockages ! Logging ! Harvest ! Hydropower development ! Hatchery introgression 13) Middle Columbia River Basin Mosier Creek, OR to the Yakima River, WA inclusive. ! Water diversion\ extraction ! Hydropower development ! Agriculture ! Hatchery introgression ! Predation ! Harvest 14) Upper Columbia River Basin Columbia River upstream from Yakima River, WA. ! Hydropower development ! Water diversion\ extraction ! Agriculture ! Hatchery introgression ! Predation ! Harvest 15) Snake River Basin Snake River Basin, ID, upstream from confluence with Columbia River. ! Logging ! Agriculture ! Hydropower development ! Water diversion\ extraction ! Hatchery introgression ! Habitat blockages ! Mining ! Harvest 57 Literature Cited Altukhov, Y. P. and E. A. Salmenkova. 1986. Stock transfer relative to natural organization, management and conservation of fish populations. In: Ryman and Utter ( eds.), Population genetics and fisheries management. University of Washington Press. Seattle, WA.

Allen, B. 1974. Early marine life history of Big Qualicum River chum salmon. In: Proceedings of the 1974 Northeast Pacific pink salmon workshop ( Harding, D., ed.). Department of the Environment, Fisheries, Vancouver, B. C.

Allendorf, F. W. and S. R. Phelps. 1980. Loss of genetic variance in a hatchery stock of cutthroat trout. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 109: 537 543.

Anderson, H. W. 1971. Relative contributions of sediment from source areas and transport processes. Pages 55 63 in J. Morris, ed. Symposium, forest land uses and stream environment. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon.

Barbour, M., B. Paulik, F. Drysdale and S. Lindstrom. 1991. California vegetation: diversity and change. Fremontia. 19( 1): 3 12.

Barnhart, Roger A. 1986. Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates ( Pacific Southwest)  steelhead. U. S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Biol. Rep. 82( 11.60). U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, TR EL 82 4. 21 p.

Beamesderfer, R. C. and B. E. Rieman. 1988. Abundance and distribution of northern squawfish, walleye, and smallmouth bass. In: Poe, T. P. and B. E. Rieman ( Eds.) Predation by resident fish on juvenile salmonids in John Day reservoir, 1983 1986. Final Report, ( Contracts DE A179 82BP34796 AND DE A179 82BP35097) Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon.

Beamish, R. J., B. L. Thomson, and G. A. McFarlane. 1992. Spiny dogfish predation on chinook and coho salmon and the potential effects on hatchery produced salmon. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 121: 444 445.

Beamish, R. J. and D. R. Bouillon. 1993. Marine fish production trends. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Climate Change and Northern Fish Populations. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada. September 1992.

Behnke, R. J. 1992. Native trout of western North America. Amer. Fish. Soc. Monograph no. 6. 275 p.

Behnke, A. C. 1990. A perspective on America's vanishing streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 9: 77 88. 58 Bennett, D. H., C. M. Falter, and R. G. White. 1979. Columbia Basin Water Withdrawal Environmental Review. Appendix  D  Fish Part II Snake River. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District. 90 130 p.

Benner, P. A. 1992. Historical reconstruction of the Coquille River and surrounding landscape. Sections 3.2, 3.3 in: The action plan for Oregon coastal wetlands, estuaries, and ocean waters. Near Coastal Waters National Pilot Project, Environmental Protection Agency, 1988 1991. Portland, Oregon: Conducted by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality.

Berg, L. and T. G. Northcote. 1985. Changes in territorial, gill flaring, and feeding behavior in juvenile coho salmon ( Oncorhychus kisutch) following short term pulses of suspended sediment. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 42: 1410 1417.

Bergren, J. J. and M. J. Filardo. 1991. An analysis of variables influencing the migration of juvenile salmonids in the Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers. Fish Passage Center, Portland, Oregon 97201.

Beschta, R. L. 1979. Debris removal and its effects on sedimentation in an Oregon Coast Range stream. Northwest Science. 53: 71 77.

Bisson, P. A. and seven coauthors. 1987. Large woody debris in forested streams in the Pacific Northwest: past, present, and future. In: Salo, E. O., T. W. Cundy, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. Contribution Number. 57. Seattle, Washington: University of Washington, Institute of Forest Resources. 143 190.

Bisson, P. A. and J. R. Seddell. 1984. Salmonid populations in streams in clearcut vs. old growth forest of wester Washington. In: Meehan, W. R; Merrell, Jr., T. R. Hanley, T. A., eds. Fish and wildlife relationships in old growth forest: Proceedings of the symposium. Asheville, NC: American Institute of Fishery Research Biologists. 121 129.

Bjornn, T. C., M. A. Brusven, M. P. Molnav, J. H. Milligan, R. A. Klamt, E. Chaco, and C. Schaye. 1977. Transport of granitic sediment in streams and its effects on insects and fish. University of Idaho Cooperative Fishery research Unit Bulletin 17. Completion report project B 036 1DA. 43p.

Botkin, Daniel, K. Cummins, T. Dunne, H. Reiger, M. Sobel, and L. Talbot. 1995. Status and future of salmon in Western Oregon and Northern California. The Center for the Study of the Environment. Report # 8. May, 1995.

Bottom, D. L., P. J. Howell, and J. D. Rogers. 1985. The effects of stream alterations on salmon and trout habitat in Oregon. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. 70 p. 59 Bottom, D. L., T. E. Nickelson, and S. L. Johnson. 1986. Research and development of Oregon's coastal salmon stocks: coho salmon model. Annual Progress Report. Portland, Oregon: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. 29p.

Brege, D. A., D. R. Miller and R. D. Ledgerwood. 1987. Evaluation of the rehabilitated juvenile salmonid collection and passage system at John Day Dam  1986. NMFS and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. Contract DACW57 86 F 0245.

Brodeur, R. D. and D. M. Ware. 1992. Interdecadal variability in pelagic nekton biomass in the Central Subarctic Domain of the northeast Pacific Ocean. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Climate Change and Northern fish Populations. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada. September 1992 Brown, R. F. and B. R. Mate. 1983. Abundance, movements and feeding habits of harbor seals, Phoca vitulina, at Netarts and Tillamook Bays, Oregon. NOAA Fishery Bull. 81( 2): 291 301.

Brown, L. R., P. B. Moyle, and R. M. Yoshiyama. 1994. Status of coho salmon in California. M. S. Thesis. Davis, CA. Univ. Ca. Davis Press.

Bryant, G. J. 1994. Status review of coho salmon populations in Scott and Waddell Creeks, Santa Cruz County, California. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Region, Protected Species Management Division, Santa Rosa, California. 102p.

Bryant, M. D. 1980. Evolution of large, organic debris after timber harvest: Maybeso Creek, 1949 to 1978. General Technical Report, PNW 101. U. S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. Portland, Oregon.

Buchanan, D. V., Sanders, J. E., Zinn, J. L., and Fryer, J. L. 1983. Relative susceptibility of four strains of summer steelhead to infection by Ceratomyxa shasta. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 112: 541 543.

Burgner, R. L., J. T. Light, L. Margolis, T. Okazaki, A. Tautz, and S. Ito. 1992. Distribution and origins of steelhead trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss) in offshore waters of the Pacific Ocean. International North Pacific Fisheries Commission. Bulletin number 51.

Busby, P. 1991. The abundance of epibenthic and planktonic macrofauna and feeding habits of juvenile fall chinook salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Mattole River estuary/ lagoon, Humboldt County, California. M. S. Thesis, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California. 130p.

Busby, Peggy J., T. C. Wainwright, and R. S. Waples. 1994. Status review for Klamath Mountains Province steelhead. NOAA technical memorandum NMFS NWFSC 19. 130 p. 60 Busby, P. J., T. C. Wainwright, G. J. Bryant, L. J. Lierheimer, R. S. Waples, F. W. Waknitz, and I. V. Lagomarsino. 1996. Status review of west coast steelhead from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California. U. S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS NWFSC 27. 261p.

Calhoun, A. and C. Seely. 1963. Logging damage to California Streams in 1962. California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Administrative Report 63 2. 16p.

California Advisory Committee on Salmon and Steelhead Trout. 1988. Restoring the balance, 1988 annual report. Annual report to California Department of Fish and Game and California Legislature. Sacramento, California. 84p.

California Department of Fish and Game. 1965. California fish and wildlife plan. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California. 611p.

California Department of Fish and Game. 1991. Sport fishing for anadromous salmonid fishes. California Department of Fish and Game draft environmental/ satellite document. August 1991. 62p. + appendix.

California Department of Fish and Game. 1994. Petition to the Board of Forestry to list coho salmon ( Oncorhynchus kisutch) as a sensitive species. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California. 35p. + appendix.

California Department of Fish and Game. 1995. Letter from Timothy Farley, Chief, Inland Fisheries Division, California Department of Fish and Game, to J. Lecky, Chief, Protected Species Management Division, NMFS. Letter dated November 6, 1995. 14p.

California Department of Water Resources. 1982a. Watershed management for unstable and erodible areas in northwestern California. Prepared for the U. S. EPA and the California State Water Resources Control Board. 68p.

California Department of Water Resources. 1982b. South Fork of the Trinity River salmonid enhancement study. California Department of Water Resources, Northern District, Red Bluff, California. 175p.

California State Lands Commission. 1993. California's rivers, a public trust report. 304p.

Carlton, A. 1989. Ceratomyxa shasta geographic and seasonal distribution in northern California and comparative salmon strain susceptibility. M. S. Thesis. Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA.

CH2M Hill. 1985. Klamath River basin fisheries resource plan. Prepared for the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior. Redding, CA. 61 Chapman, D., C. Peven, T. Hillman, A. Giorgi, and F. Utter. 1994. Status of summer steelhead in the Mid Columbia River. Don Chapman Consultants, Inc. 235 p. + appedicies.

Chelton, D. B., P. A. Bernal, and J. A. McGowan. 1982a. Large scale interannual physical and biological interactions in the California Current. Journal of Marine Resources 40: 1095 1125.

Chelton, D. B. and R. E. Davis. 1982b. Monthly mean sea level variability along the west coast of North America. Journal of Physical Ocean 12: 757 784.

Chelton, D. B. 1983. Commentary: Short term characteristic variability in the Northeastern Pacific Ocean. Pp. 87 99 In: W. G. Pearcy ( ed.), The influence of ocean conditions on the production of salmonids in the North Pacific. Oregon State University Sea Grant Program Publication ORESU W 83 001.

Chilcote, M. W., S. A. Leider, and J. J. Loch. 1986. Differential reproductive success of hatchery and wild summer run steelhead under natural conditions. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 115: 726 735.

Colebrook, J. M. 1977. Annual fluctuations in biomass of taxonomic groups of zooplankton in the California Current, 1955 59. Fisheries Bulletin 75: 357 368.

Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority. 1988a. Comments on the Fish and Wildlife Program Spill Amendment.

Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority. 1991a. The biological and technical justification for the flow proposal of the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority. Columbia Basin fish and Wildlife Authority, Portland, Or. 72 p.

Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority. 1991b. Detailed Fishery Operating Plan with 1991 Operating Criteria. Columbia Basin fish and Wildlife Authority.

Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority. 1994. Fish passage center annual report. March 31, 1994. Columbia Fish and Wildlife Authority. 123p. + appendices.

Columbia Basin Indian Tribes and the State and Federal Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 1993. Detailed Fishery Operating Plan with 1994 Criteria. November, 1993.

Columbia River Water Management Group. 1978. Columbia River Water Management Report for Water Year 1977. 72p. + appendices.

Columbia River Water Management Group. 1991. Columbia River Water Management Report for Water Year 1990. 62 Cooney, R. T., T. M. Willamette, S. Sharr, D. Sharp, and J. Olsen. 1993. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Climate Change and Northern Fish Populations. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada. September 1992.

Cooper, R. and T. H. Johnson. 1992. Trends in steelhead ( Oncorhynchus mykiss) abundance in Washington and along the Pacific coast of North America. Washington Department of Wildlife, Fisheries Management Division, Report number 92 20. 90p.

Cordone, A. J. and D. W. Kelley. 1961. The influences of inorganic sediment on the aquatic life of streams. California Department of Fish and Game Bulletin 42( 2): 189 228.

Craig, J. L. and T. S. Fletcher. 1994. Annual Report. Klamath River fisheries assessment program, 1992. U. S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata, California. 63p.

Cramer, Steven P., and 16 coauthors. 1995. The status of steelhead populations in California in regards to the Endangered Species Act. S. P. Cramer and Associates. 190p.

Crouse, M. R., C. A. Callahan, K. W. Malveg, and S. E. Dominquez. 1981. Effects of fine sediments on growth of juvenile coho salmon in laboratory streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 110( 2): 281 286.

Dahl, T. E. 1990. Wetlands losses in the Unites States 1780' s to 1980' s. U. S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D. C.

Decker, M. B. and G. L. Hunt. 1993. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Climate Change and Northern Fish Populations. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada. September 1992.

Eber, L. E. 1971. Characteristics of sea surface temperature anomalies. Fisheries Bulletin 69: 345 355.

Edwards, R., G. Portes, and F. Fleming. 1992. Regional nonpoint source program summary. Eno. Root Agency, Region 10, Seattle, Washington.

Evelyn, T. P. T, J. E. Ketcheson and L. Prosperi Porta. 1984. Further evidence for the presence of Renibacterium salmoninarum in salmonid eggs and for the failure of providone  iodine to reduce the intra ovum infection rate in water hardened eggs. J. Fish Dis. 7: 173 182.

Evelyn, T. P. T., L. Prosperi Porta, and J. E. Ketcheson. 1986. Experimental intra ovum infection of salmonid eggs with Renibacterium salmoninarum and vertical transmission of the pathogen with such eggs despite their treatment with erythromycin. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 1: 197 202. 63 Favorite, F. and D. R. McLain. 1973. Coherence in transpacific movements of positive and negative anomalies of sea surface temperature, 1953 1960. Nature 244: 139 143 Fish Passage Center of the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority. 1988. Adult Fishway Inspections, 1987 Annual Report. Managers Annual Report.

Fish Passage Center of the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority. 1989b. Adult Fishway Inspections, 1988 Annual Report.

Fish Passage Center of the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority. 1990b. Adult Fishway Inspections, 1989 Annual Report.

Fisk, L., E. Gerstung, and J. Thomas. 1966. Stream damage surveys 1966. California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Administrative Report 66 10. 15p.

Fleming, I. A. and M. R. Gross. 1992. Reproductive behavior of hatchery and wild coho salmon ( Oncorhynchus kisutch): does it differ? Aquaculture 103: 101 121.

Foott, S. J. 1992. Disease survey of the Trinity River salmonid smolt populations, 1991 report. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Nevada Fish Health Center, Anderson, CA. 31p.

Foott, S. J., R. L. Walker, J. D. Williamson and K. C. True. 1994. Health and physiology monitoring of chinook and steelhead smolts in the Trinity and Klamath rivers. Unpublished report. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Nevada Fish Health Center, Anderson, CA. 12p.

Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team ( FEMAT). 1993. Forest ecosystem management: an ecological, economic, and social assessment. Report published by the U. S. Department of Agriculture and five other federal agencies, July 1993.

Francis, R. C. and T. H. Sibley. 1991. Climate change and fisheries: what are the real issues? NW Environment Journal 7: 295 307.

Francis, R. C., S. Riser and W. Wooster. 1992. Salmonid fisheries oceanography of the Northeast Pacific: A proposal to Washington Sea Grant. Washington Sea Grant Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 98195. 35p.

Francis, R. C. 1993. Climate change and salmonid production in the North Pacific Ocean. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Pacific Climate ( PACLIM) Workshop, April 21 24, 64 1992, K. T. Redmond and V. L. Tharp ( eds.). California Department of Water Resources, Interagency Ecological Studies Progress, Technical Report 34.

Frissell, C. A. 1992. Cumulative effects of land use on salmon habitat in Southwest Oregon coastal streams. Oregon State University. Ph. D. Dissertation.

Fryer, J. L. and J. E. Sanders. 1981. Bacterial kidney disease of salmonid fish. Annual Review of Microbiology, 35: 273 298.

Fulton, J. D. and R. J. LeBrasseur. 1985. Interannual shifting of the Subarctic Boundary and some of the biotic effects on juvenile salmonids. Pp 237 247 In: W. S. Wooster and D. Fluharty ( eds.), El Niño effects in the eastern Subarctic Pacific. Washington Sea Grant Prog., Seattle.

Furniss, M. J., T. D. Roelofs, and C. S. Yee. 1991. Road construction and maintenance. In: Influences of Forest and Rangeland Management on Salmonid Fishes and their Habitats. AFS Spec. Publ. 19: 297 323.

Gibbons, D. R. and E. O. Salo. 1973. Annotated bibliography of the effects of logging on fish of the western United States and Canada. U. S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, General Technical Report. PNW 10.

Gould, R. W., G. A. Wedemeyer, undated. The role of diseases in the decline of Columbia River anadromous fish populations. USFWS/ NMFS joint report, 81p.

Goodman, M. L. 1990. Preserving the genetic diversity of salmonid stocks: a call for federal regulation of hatchery programs. Environmental Law. 20: 111 166.

Graybill, M. R. 1981. Haul out patterns and diet of harbor seals, Phoca vitulina, in Coos County, Oregon. Master's Thesis. Univ. of Oregon. 55p.

Hagans, D. K., W. E. Weaver, and M. A. Madej. 1986. Long term on site and off site effects of logging and erosion in the Redwood Creek Basin in northern California. Natural Council on Air and Streams, Technical Bulletin 460. New York, New York.

Hanson, L. C. 1993. The foraging ecology of Harbor Seals, Phoca vitulina, and California Sea Lions, Zalophus californianus, at the mouth of the Russian River, California. M. S. Thesis, Sonoma State University, California. 70p.

Hare, S. R. and R. C. Francis. 1993. Climate change and salmonid production in the North Pacific Ocean. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Climate Change and 65 Northern Fish Populations. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada. September 1992. Harmon, J. R., G. M. Matthews, D. L. Park, and T. E. Ruehle. 1989. Evaluation of Transportation of Juvenile Salmonids and Related Research on the Columbia and Snake Rivers, 1988. Report to U. S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Harris, L. D. 1984. Bottomland Hardwoods: valuable, vanishing, vulnerable. Florida Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, Gainseville, Florida.

Hartman, G. H. 1965. The role of behavior in the ecology and interaction of underyearling coho salmon ( Oncorhynchus kisutch) and steelhead salmon ( Salmon gairdneri). Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. 22: 1035 1061.

Harvey, J. T. 1988. Population dynamics, annual food consumption, movements, and dive behaviors of harbor seals, Phoca vitulina richardsi, in Oregon. Thesis, OSU.

Hawkes, L. A., R. C. Johnsen, W. W. Smith, R. D. Martinson, W. A. Hevlin, and R. F. Absolon. 1991. Monitoring of Downstream Salmon and Steelhead at Federal Hydroelectric Facilities  1990. Annual Report. NOAA, NMFS, prepared for BPA.

Hendrickson, G. L., A. Carleton, and D. Manzer. 1989. Geographic and seasonal distribution of the infective stage of Ceratomyxa shasta ( Myxozoa) in Northern California. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 7: 165 169.

Herbert, D. W. M. and J. C. Merkens. 1961. The effect of suspended mineral solids on the survival of trout. International Journal Air Water Pollution 5( 1): 46 53.

Hicks, B. J. 1990. The influence of geology and timber harvest on channel geomorphology and salmonid populations in Oregon Coast Range streams. Corvallis, Oregon: Oregon State University. 199p. Ph. D. dissertation.

Higgins, P. 1991. Habitat types of the Eel River Estuary and their associated fishes and invertebrates. In: C. Roberts ( ed.) Report on Fish and Wildlife species of the Eel delta. Funded by the Eel River RCD, USDA Soil Conservation Service, Eureka, California.

Higgins, P., S. Dobush, and D. Fuller. 1992. Factors in northern California threatening stocks with extinction. Humboldt Chapter American Fisheries Society. 26p.

Hilborn, R. 1992. Hatcheries and the future of salmon in the northwest. Fisheries. 17: 5 8.

Hindar, K., N. Ryman, and F. Utter. 1991. Genetic effects of cultured fish on natural fish populations. Canadian Journal Fisheries Aquatic Sciences 48: 945 957. 66 Hofstra, T. D. 1983. Management alternatives for Redwood Creek Estuary. Redwood National Park, Arcata, California.

Holman, G. and W. A. Evans. 1964. Stream clearance project completion report for Noyo River, Mendocino County. California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Administrative Report 64 10. 10p.

Holmes, H. B. 1952. Loss of fingerlings in passing Bonneville Dam as determined by marking experiments. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Unpublished Manuscript.

Hollowed, A. B. and W. S. Wooster. 1991. Variability of winter ocean conditions and strong year classes of Northeast Pacific groundfish. ICES 1991/ Variability Symposium/ Paper No. 33/ Session 3.

Holt, R. A., J. E. Sanders, J. L Zinn, J. L. Fryer, and K. S. Pilcher. 1975. Relation of water temperature to flexibacter columnaris infection in steelhead trout ( Salmo gairdneri), coho ( Oncorhynchus kisutch) and chinook ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) salmon. Fish. Res. Board Can. 32: 1553 1559.

Holtby, L. B. and J. C. Scriverner. 1989. Observed and simulated effects of climatic variability, clear cut logging and fishing on the numbers of chum salmon ( Oncorhynchus keta) and coho salmon ( Oncorhynchus kisutch) returning to Carnation Creek, British Columbia. Canadian Special Publication Fisheries Aquatic Sciences 105: 62 81.

Holtby, L. B., B. C. Anderson, and R. K. Kadawaki. 1990. Importance of smolt size and early ocean growth to interannual variability in marine survival of coho salmon ( Oncorhynchus kisutch). Canadian Journal Fisheries Aquatic Sciences 47: 2181 2194.

Hubbell, P. M. 1979. Fisheries Investigations. Performed for the Trinity River Basin Fish and Wildlife Task Force. Priority Work Item No. 5. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California.

Hydrosphere. 1991. Water supplies to promote juvenile anadromous fish migration in the Snake River Basin. Final report to the National Marine Fisheries Service. Contract No. 50ABNF900105.

Jackson, T. 1995. Personal communication between Tom Jackson, California Department of Fish and Game, and Greg Bryant, NMFS.

Jameson, R. J. and K. W. Kenyon. 1977. Prey of sea lions in the Rogue River, Oregon. J. Mammal. 58( 4): 672. 67 Janda, R. J., K. M. Nolan, D. R. Harden, and S. M. Coleman. 1975. Watershed conditions in the drainage basin of Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, California. U. S. Geologic Survey, Menlo Park, California. File report 75 568. 266p.

Jensen, D. B., M. Torn, and J. Harte. 1990. In our own hands: A strategy for conserving biological diversity in California. California Policy Seminar Research Report. University of California, Berkley. ( Available from: NMFS, Southwest region, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802 4213)

Johnsen, R. C., L. A. Hawkes, W. W. Smith, G. L. Fredricks, R. D. Martinson and W. A. Hevlin. 1990. Monitoring of Downstream Salmon and Steelhead at Federal Hydroelectric Facilities  1989. Annual Report. NOAA, NMFS, ETSD. 18 p. + appendices.

Johnson, S. L. 1988. The effects of the 1983 El Nino on Oregon's coho ( Oncorhynchus kisutch), and chinook ( O. tshawytscha) salmon. Fisheries Research. 6: 105 123.

Judsen, S. and D. F. Ritter. 1964. Rates of regional denudation in the United States. Journal of Geophysical Research volume 69. 11: 3395 3401.

Kaczynski, V. W., and J. F. Palmisano. 1993. Oregon's wild salmon and steelhead trout: a review of the impact of management and environmental factors. Oregon Forest Industries Council, Salem, Oregon. April, 1993. 328p.

Kaufmann, P. R. 1987. Channel morphology and hydraulic characteristics of torrent impacted streams in the Oregon Coast Range, USA. Corvallis, Oregon: Oregon State University. Ph. D. dissertation. 235p.

Kellogg, E., editor. 1992. Coastal temperate rain forests: ecological characteristics, status, and distribution worldwide. Ecotrust and Conservation International, Portland, Oregon and Washington D. C.

Kelsey, H. M. 1980. A sediment budget and an analysis of geomorphic processes in the Van Duzen River basin, north coastal California, 1941 1975: Summary. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., part 1, 91: 190 195.

Koski, K. V. and R. A. Walter. 1978. Forest practices in relation to management of Alaska's coastal zone resources: a review with management and guideline recommendations. National Marine Fisheries Service, Auke Bay Laboratory. 189 p.

KRBFTF. 1991. Long range plan for the Klamath River basin conservation area fishery restoration program. The Klamath River Basin Fisheries Task Force. 68 Kreissman, B. 1991. California, an environmental atlas and guide. Bear Klaw Press, Davis, California.

Kubicek, P. F. 1977. Summer water temperature conditions in the Eel River system with reference to trout and salmon. M. S. Thesis, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California. 198 p.

Lawson, Peter, W. 1993. Cycles in ocean productivity, trends in habitat quality, and the restoration of salmon runs in Oregon. Fisheries. 18: 6 10.

Ledgerwood, R. D., E. M. Dawley, L. G. Gilbreth, P. J. Bently, B. P. Sanford and M. H. Schiewe. 1990. Relative survival of subyearling chinook salmon which have passed Brown Dam via the spillway or the second powerhouse turbines or bypass system in 1989, w/ comparisons to 1987 and 1988. NMFS and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. Contract E85890024/ E86890097.

Leek, S. L. 1987. Viral erythrocytic inclusion body syndrome ( EIBS) occurring in juvenile spring chinook salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) reared in freshwater. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44: 685 688.

Leider, Steven A. 1989. Increased straying by adult steelhead trout, Salmon gairdneri, following the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 24: 219 229.

Leopold, L. B. 1968. Hydrology for urban land planning a guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use. USGS Circular 554.

Levine, E. R. and W. B. White. 1983. Bathythermic influences upon the character of North Pacific fronts, 1976 1980. Jour. Geophys. res. 86: 9617 9625.

Li, H. W., C. B. Schreck, C. E. Bond, E. Rexstad. 1987. Factors influencing changes in fish assemblages of Pacfic Northwest streams. In: Mathews, W. J., D. C. Heins, eds. Community and evolutionary ecology of North American stream fishes. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press. 193 202.

Light, J. T. 1987. Coastwide abundance of North American Steelhead trout. Fisheries Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle. FRI UW 8816. 21p.

Light, J. T., S. Fowler, and M. L. Dahlberg. 1988. High seas distribution of North American steelhead as evidenced by recoveries of marked or tagged fish. Fisheries Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle. FRI UW 8816. 21p. 69 Light, J. T., C. K. Harris, and R. L. Burgner. 1989. Ocean distribution and migration of steelhead ( O. mykiss). Document submitted to the International North Pacific Fisheries Commission. FRI UW 8912. Fisheries Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle. 50p.

Lisle, T. E. 1982. The recovery of stream channels in north coastal California from recent large floods. Pages 31 41 in K. Hashagen, Ed. Habitat disturbance and recovery proceedings. California Trout, San Francisco, California. 90p.

Lloyd, D. S., J. P. Koenigs, and J. D. LaPerriere. 1987. Effects of turbidity in fresh waters of Alaska. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 7: 18 33.

Lynch, James M. 1993. Evaluation of the Merwin Trap as a means of squawfish ( Ptychocheilus oregonensis) control in the Columbia River. Master's thesis. University of Washington. 114p.

Manuwal, O. 1977. Marine bird populations in Washington State ( unpublished). Report to National Wildlife Federation. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Martin, G. 1986. Behind the scenes. The Nature Conservancy News 10/ 11. 1986: 18 23.

Matthews, G. M., D. L. Park, S. Achord, and T. E. Ruehle. 1986. Static seawater challenge test to measure relative stress levels in spring chinook salmon smolts. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 115: 236 244.

Matthews, G. M., D. L. Park, J. R. Harmon, and T. E. Ruehle. 1988. Evaluation of transportation of juvenile salmonids and related research on the Columbia and Snake Rivers, 1987. U. S. Dept. Commer., Natl. Oceanic Atmos. Admin., Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv., Northwest and Alaska Fish. Cent., Seattle, Wa. ( Annual Report to U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Contract # DACW68 84 H 0034.) 25p. + appendices.

Maule, A. G., C. B. Schreck, C. S. Bradford, and B. A. Barton. 1988. Physiological effects of collecting and transporting emigrating juvenile chinook salmon past dams on the Columbia River. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 117: 245 261.

McGowan, J. A. 1986. The biogeography of pelagic ecosystems. Pelagic Biogeography. UNESCO Technical Papers in Marine Science 49: 191 200.

McEwan, D. 1995. Pers. Comm. California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division. Sacramento, California. 70 McEwan, D. and T. A. Jackson. 1996. Steelhead restoration and management plan for California. ( Available California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, 1416 Ninth Street, Sacramento, California, 95814). 234p.

Meffe, G. K. 1992. Techno arrogance and halfway technologies: salmon hatcheries on the Pacific coast of North America. Conservation Biology. 6: 350 354.

Megahan, W. F. 1982. Channel sediment storage behind obstructions in forested drainage basins draining the granitic bedrock of the Idaho batholith. In: Swanson, ( and others). Sediment budgets and routing in forested drainage basins. General Technical Report PNW 141. Portland, Oregon: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 114 121.

Monk, B. H. and J. G. Williams. 1991. Evaluation of the juvenile collection, bypass and sampling facilities at Little Goose Dam  1990. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Moyle, P. B. and B. Herbold. 1989. The ecology of the Sacramento San Joaquin Delta: a community profile. U. S. Dept. of the Interior and U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Biological Report. 85( 7.22). 107p.

Naiman, R. J. and eight co authors. 1992. Fundamental elements of ecologically healthy watersheds in the Pacific Northwest coastal ecoregion. Pp. 127 188, In: Naiman, R. J., ed. Watershed management: balancing sustainability and environmental change. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 1988. Marine mammal protection act of 1972. Annual report 1987/ 88. Washington, D. C., U. S. Dep. Comm.

National Marine Fisheries Service. unpublished. Estimation of squawfish abundance in the forebay of Bonneville Dam first powerhouse in July and August, 1989. Interagency memo from Ben Sandford to John Williams, dated September 12, 1989.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 1991. Factors for decline: a supplement to the notice of determination for Snake River fall chinook salmon under the Endangered Species Act. Available from National Marine Fisheries Service, 525 NE Oregon St.  Suite 500, Portland, Oregon 97232. 55 p.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 1995. Review of the status of steelhead ( Oncorhynchus mykiss) from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California under the U. S. Endangered Species Act. Report submitted to the Northwest and Southwest Regional Directors of the National Marine Fisheries Service by the NMFS Biological Review Team for West Coast Steelhead, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, WA, 17 July 1995, 212 p. 71 Nature Conservancy The. 1990. Protecting and restoring 100 mile reach of the Sacramento River. Nature Conservancy 5/ 6 1990: 24.

Nawa, R. K., Frissell, C. A., Ebersole, J. L, and Liss, W. J. 1991. Life history and persistence of anadromous fish stocks in relation to stream habitats and watershed classification. Oregon State University. Annual Progress Report, project # F 122 R. 82 p.

Nehlsen, Willa, Jack E. Williams, and James A. Lichatowich. 1991. Pacific salmon at the cross roads: stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Fisheries. Vol. 16, No. 2. Pp. 4 21.

Nelms, P. Captain. Pers. Comm. California Department of Fish and Game, Wildlife Protection Division. Sacramento, California.

Neeley, D. 1994. The relation between oceanic factors and California steelhead survival. Prepared by S. P. Cramer and Associates, Gresham, Oregon for the Association of California Water Agencies. Pp. 1 32.

Nicholas, J. W. and D. G. Hankin. 1988. Chinook salmon populations in Oregon coastal river basins: Description of life histories and assessment of recent trends in run strengths. Oregon Dept. Fish Wildlife. Information Report 88 1, 359 p.

Nickelson, T. E. 1986. Influences of upwelling, ocean temperature, and smolt abundance on marine survival of coho salmon ( Oncorhynchus kisutch) in the Oregon Production Area. Canadian Journal Fisheries Science 43: 527 535.

Nickelson, Thomas E., J. W. Nicholas, A. M. McGie, R. B. Lindsay, and D. L. Bottom. 1992. Status of anadromous salmonids in Oregon coastal basins. Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife. December 1992. 83 p.

Nielsen, J. 1994. Invasive cohorts: impacts of hatchery reared coho salmon on the trophic, developmental, and genetic ecology of wild stocks. USDA, U. S. Forest SErvice, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA. 58 p.

Noggle, C. C. 1978. Behavioral, physiological and lethal effects of suspended sediments on juvenile salmonids. Unpublished Masters Thesis. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 127p.

Norse, E. A. 1990. ancient forests of the Pacific Northwest. The Wilderness Society and Inland Press, Washington D. C. 72 Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission. 1995. Letter from Gary Graves, Assistant Director, Fisheries Services, NWIFC, to Garth Griffin, Chief, Protectec Species Branch, NMFS. Letter dated November 14, 1995.

Northwest Power Planning Council. 1986. Compilation of information on salmon and steelhead losses in the Columbia River Basin. Portland, Oregon. 252 p.

Northwest Power Planning Council. 1987. 1987 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. 246p.

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. 1995. Letter from Douglas Dehart, Chief of Fisheries, ODFW, to Garth Griffin, Chief, Protected Species Branch, NMFS. Letter dated October 27, 1995. 14p.

Palmisano, John F., R. H. Ellis, V. W. Kaczynski. 1993. The impact of environmental and management factors on Washington's wild anadromous salmon and trout. Washington Forest Protection Association and the State of Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington. January, 1993. 371p.

Payne, T. R. and Associates. 1989. Lower Klamath River tributary delta study. U. S. Department of Interior, BIA, Redding, California.

Pearcy, W. C. and J. P. Fisher. 1988. Migrations of coho salmon ( Oncorhynchus kisutch) during their first summer in the ocean. Fishery Bulletin 86: 173 195.

Pearcy, W. C. 1991. Biology of the Transition Region. In: Wetherall ( ed.) Biology, oceanography, and fisheries of the north Pacific Transition Zone and Subarctic Frontal Zone. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 105. U. S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, NMFS.

Pearcy, W. C. 1992. Ocean ecology of North Pacific salmonids. Washington Sea Grant Program, Seattle, WA. 179p.

Pella, J., R. Rumbaugh, L. Simon, M. Dahlberg, S. Pennoyer, and M. Rose. 1991. Incidental and illegal catches of salmonids in North Pacific driftnet fisheries. INPFC Document. Auke Bay Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, NOAA, NMFS. 48p.

Pfeifer, B. 1987. Managing around marine mammal predation on winter run steelhead returning to Lake Washington. Washington Department of Wildlife. Fish Management Report # 87 7. 99p. 73 Phillips, R. W, Lantz, R. L., Claire, E. W. and Moring, J. R. 1975. Some effects of gravel mixtures on emergence of coho salmon and steelhead trout fry. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 104: 461 466.

Poe, P. P. and B. E. Rieman ( Eds.) 1988. Predation by resident fish on juvenile salmonids in John Day Reservoir, 1983 1986. Final Report, ( Contracts DE A179 82BP34796 and DE A179 82BP35097) Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon.

Poon, D. and J. Garcia. 1982. A comparative analysis of anadromous salmonids stocks and possible cause for their population decline in selected watersheds of the eastern Pacific Coast. Unpublished report prepared for the Northwest Power Planning Council, Portland, Oregon. 189p. + appedicies.

Puckett, L. K. 1977. The Eel River estuary observations on morphometry, fishes, water quality, and invertebrates. California Department of Fish and Game, memo. report. 52p.

Quinn, T. P. and R. F. Tallman. 1987. Seasonal environmental predictability in riverine fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 18: 155 159.

Reeves, G. H. 1985. Competition between redside shiners and steelhead trout in the Umpqua River, Oregon. Doctoral thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.

Reeves, G. H., F. H Everest, J. R. Seddell. 1993. Diversity of juvenile anadromous salmonid assemblages in basins in coastal Oregon, USA with different levels of timber harvest. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc.

Reid, J. L. Jr. 1962. On circulation, phosphate phosphorous content and zooplankton volumes in the upper part of the Pacific Ocean. Limnological Oceanographer. 7: 287 306.

Reiner, R. and T. Griggs. 1989. Restoring riparian forests. The Nature Conservancy Magazine 5/ 6. 1989: 10 16.

Reisenbichler, R. R. and J. D. McIntyre. 1977. Genetic differences in growth and survival of juvenile hatchery and wild steelhead trout. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34: 123 128.

Reynolds, F. L., T. J. Mills, R. Benthin, and A. Low. 1993. Restoring Central Valley streams: a plan for action. California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Sacramento, California. 129p.

Rieman, B. E., R. C. Beamsderfer, S. Vigg, and T. P. Poe. 1991. Estimated loss of juvenile salmonids to predation by northern squawfish, walleyes, and smallmouth bass in John Day Reservoir, Columbia River. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 120: 448 458. 74 Ritchie, J. C. 1972. Sediment, fish and fish habitat. Journal Soil Water Conservation 27( 3): 124 125.

Roden, G. I. 1977. Oceanic subarctic fronts of the central Pacific: Structure and response to atmospheric forcing. Jour. Phys. Oceanogr. 76: 761 778.

Roelofs, T. D. 1983. Current status of California summer steelhead ( Salmo gairdneri) stocks and habitat, and recommendations for their management. Report to the U. S. Forest Service, Region 5. 77p.

Roffe, T. J. and B. R. Mate. 1984. Abundance and feeding habits of pinnipeds in the Rogue River, Oregon. J. Wildl. Manage. 48( 4): 1262 1274.

Rogers, D. E. 1984. Trends in abundance of northeastern Pacific stocks of salmon. Pp. 100 127 In: W. G. Pearcy ( ed.) The influence of ocean conditions on the production of salmonids in the North Pacific. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.

Rogers, D. E. 1987. Pacific salmon. Pp. 461 476 In: D. W. Hood and S. T. Zimmerman ( eds.). Alaska Office of Ocean Assessment Division, NOAA, Washington D. C.

Ross, C. V. 1983. Evaluation of adult fish passage at Bonneville Dam, 1982. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District, Portland, Oregon. 17p.

Royer, T. C. 1989. Upper ocean temperature variability in the northeast Pacific Ocean: Is it an indicator of Global warming? Jour. Geophys. Res. 94: 18175 18183.

Rucker, Earp, and E. J. Ordall. 1953. Infectious diseases of Pacific salmon. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 83: 297 312.

Ruggerone, G. 1986. Consumption of migrating juvenile salmonids by gulls foraging below a Columbia River dam. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 115: 736 742.

Sandecki, M. 1989. Aggregate mining in river systems. California Geology 42( 4): 88 94.

Sanders, J. E., J. J. Long, C. K. Arakawa, J. L. Bartholomew, and J. S. Rohovec. 1992. Prevalence of Renibacterium salmoninarum among downstream migrating salmonids in the Columbia River. Journ. Aquat. Animal Health. 4: 72 75.

Scarnecchia. 1981. Effects of streamflow and upwelling on yield of wild coho salmon ( Oncorhynchus kisutch) in Oregon. Canadian Jour. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38: 471 475. 75 Schlosser, I. J. 1988. Predation risk and habitat selection by two size classes of a stream cyprinid: experimental test of a hypothesis. Oikos. 52: 36 40.

Schoeneman, D. E., R. T. Pressey and C. O. Junge. 1961. Mortalities of downstream migrant salmon at McNary Dam. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 90( 1): 58 72.

Schreck, C. B. 1987. Stress measurement. Pages 89 96 In: Improving hatchery effectiveness as related to smoltification, Proceedings of smolt workshop. Warm Springs, Oregon.

Sedell, J. R., P. A. Bisson, F. J. Swanson, and S. V. Gregory. 1988. What we know about large trees that fall into streams and rivers. Pp. 47 112 In From the forest to the sea: A story of fallen trees. USDA Forest Service and U. S. Department of Interior, BLM. General Technical Report PNW GTR 229. Portland, Oregon.

Sedell, J. R. and K. J Luchessa. 1982. Using historical record as an aid to salmonid habitat enhancement. Pages 210 223, In: Armantrout, N. B., ed. Acquisition and utilization of aquatic inventory information. Proceedings of the symposium, Bethesda, Maryland. American Fisheries Society, Western Division.

Sedell, J. and C. Maser. 1994. From the forest to the sea: the ecology of wood in streams, rivers, estuaries and oceans. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, Florida. 200 p.

Shapovalov, L. and A. C. Taft. 1954. The life histories of steelhead trout ( Salmo gairdneri) and silver salmon ( Oncoryhchus kisutch) with special reference to Waddell Creek, California, and recommendation regarding their management. California Department of Fish and Game, Fisheries Bulletin number 98. 373p.

Shepherd, J. G., J. G. Pope, and R. D. Cousens. 1984. Variations in fish stocks and hypotheses concerning their link to climate. Rapp. P. V. Reun. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer. 36: 15 26.

Sigismondi, L. A. and L. J. Weaver. 1988. Changes in avoidance response time of juvenile chinook salmon exposed to multiple acute handling stresses. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 117: 196 201.

Sigler, John W., T. C. Bjornn, and Fred H. Everest. 1984. Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 113: 142 150.

Simenstad, C. A., K. L. Fresh, and E. O. Salo. 1982. The role of Puget Sound and Washington coastal estuaries in the life history of Pacific salmon: an unappreciated function. In: V. Kennedy ( ed) Estuarine Comparisons. Academic Press. New York, N. Y. 709p. 76 Sims, C. W., W. W. Bentley, and R. C. Johnsen. 1978. Effects of power peaking operations on juvenile salmon and steelhead trout migrations  progress 1977. U. S. Dept. Commer., Natl. Oceanic Atmos. Admin., Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv., Northwest and Alaska Fish. Cent., Seattle, Wa. ( Contract # DACW68 77 C 0025), 25 p. + appendices.

Smith, J. J. 1987. Aquatic habitat and fish utilization of Pescadero, San Gregorio, Waddell and Pomponio Creek estuary/ lagoon systems. Report to California Department of Parks and recreation, Interagency Agreement 4 823 6004. 35p.

Smith, J. J. 1990. The effects of sandbar formation and inflows on the aquatic habitat and fish utilization in Pescadero, San Gregorio, Waddell and Pomponio creek estuary/ lagoon systems, 1985 1989. San Jose State University, San Jose, California. Interagency Agreement 84 04 324. 38p.

Smith, J. J. 1992. Summary of trapping results on Waddell Creek for 1991 1992. San Jose State University. San Jose, California. 13p.

Speis, T. A. and J. F. Franklin. 1988. Old growth and forest dynamics in the Douglas fir region of western Oregon and Washington. Natural Areas Jour. 8: 190 201.

Stempel, M. 1988. Possible implications of integrating hatchery and natural production of salmon and steelhead in the Trinity River Basin. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Weaverville, California.

Steward, C. R and T. C. Bjornn. 1990. Supplementation of salmon and steelhead stocks with hatchery fish: a synthesis of published literature. Idaho Cooperative Fisheries and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID. Tech. Report 90 1.

Strieg, D. 1995. Pers. comm. Monterey Bay Salmon and Trout Project, Davenport, California.

Sullivan, K. T. and four coathors. 1987. Stream channels: the link between forests and fish. In: Salo, E. O., T. W. Cundy, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. Contribution Number. 57. Seattle, Washington: University of Washington, Institute of Forest Resources. 39 97.

Swanson, F. J., G. W. Gregory, and J. R. Sedell. 1976. History, physical effects, and management implications of large organic debris in western Oregon streams. General Technical Report PNW 56. Portland, Oregon: U. S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 15p.

Sweeney, B. W. and R. L. Vannote. 1978. Size variation and the distribution of hemimetabolous aquatic insects: two themal equilibrium hypotheses. Science. 77 Tabata, S. 1984. Oceanographic factors influencing the distribution, migration, and survival of salmonids in the Northeast Pacific Ocean a review. Pp. 87 99 In: W. G. Pearcy ( ed.) The influence of ocean conditions on the production of salmonids in the North Pacific. Oregon State University Sea Grant Prog. Pub. ORESU W 83 001.

Thom, R. M. 1987. The biological importance of Pacific Northwest estuaries. Northwest Environmental Journal. 3( 1): 21 42.

Tiner, R. W. 1991. The concept of a hydrophyte for wetland identification. Bioscience 41: 236 247.

Titus, R., D. C. Erman, and W. M. Snider. In press. History and status of steelhead in California coastal drainages south of San Francisco Bay. Hilgardia.

Titus, R., D. C. Erman, and W. M. Snider. 1994. History and status of steelhead in California coastal drainages south of San Francisco Bay. California Department of Fish and Game, Environmental Services, Sacramento, California. 242p.

Trenberth, K. E. 1990. Recent observed interdecadal climate changes in the Northern Hemisphere. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 71: 988 992.

Trenberth, K. E. and J. W. Hurrell. 1993. Decadal coupled atmospheric ocean variations in the North Pacific. Proceedings of the Int. Symp. on Climate Change and North. Fish. Pop., September 1992. Dept. Fish. and Oceans, Canada.

Uremovich, B. L., S. P. Cramer, C. F. Willis, and C. O. Junge. 1980. Passage of juvenile salmonids through the ice trash sluiceway and squawfish predation at Bonneville Dam, 1980. Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, Annual Prog. Rept. 46p.

U. S. Bureau of Reclamation. 1973. Fishery improvement study, Eureka Division North Coast Project California. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Mid Pacific Region, Sacramento, California. 44p. + Appendix.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1988. National water quality inventory: 1988 report to Congress. Washington, D. C.

U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1991. Long range plan for the Klamath River basin conservation area fishery restoration program. Klamath Field Office, Yreka, California. 320p.

U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1995. Letter from William Shake, Assistant Regional Director, Fisheries, USFWS, to James Lecky, Division Chief, NMFS. Letter dated October 31, 1995. 5p. 78 U. S. Forest Service, and U. S. Bureau of Land Management. 1994a. Final supplemental Environmental Impact Statement on management of habitat for late successional and oldgrowth forest related species within the range of the northern spotted owl. February, 1994.

U. S. Forest Service, and U. S. Bureau of Land Management. 1994b. Environmental assessment for the implementation of interim strategies for managing anadromous fish producing watersheds in eastern Oregon and Washington, Idaho, and portions of California. March 18, 1994. 68p. + appedicies.

Vernon, E. H. 1958. An examination of factors affecting the abundance of pink salmon in the Fraser River. Int. Pac. Salmon Fish. Comm., Progress Report. 49p.

Verspoor, E. 1988. Reduced genetic variability in first generation hatchery populations of Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar). Can. Jour. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48: 124 133.

Wagner, E. and P. Ingram. 1973. Evaluation of Fish Facilities and Passage at Foster and Green Peter Dams on the South Santiam River Drainage in Oregon. Financed by U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Portland District. Contract No. DACW57 68 C 0013.

Wahrhaftig, C. 1976. Statement of erosion problems in Redwood Creek. Memo to the Board of Forestry. January 15, 1976. California Department of Fish and Game, Eureka, California.

Waples, Robin S. 1991. Definition of " species" under the Endangered Species Act: application to Pacific salmon. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS F/ NWC 194. 29p.

Waples, R. S. and D. J. Teel. 1990. Conservation genetics of Pacific salmon I. Temporal changes in allele frequency.

Waples, R. S. 1990a. Conservation genetics of Pacific salmon II. Effective population size and the rate of loss of genetic variability. J. of Heredity. 81: 267 276.

Waples, R. S. 1990b. Conservation genetics of Pacific salmon III. Estimating effective population size. J. of Heredity. 81: 227 289.

Ward, M. B. 1993. The physical dynamics of the Subarctic Front of the North Pacific Ocean and its relation to salmon ( Oncorhynchus spp.) production. M. S. thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 109p. + appendix.

Ware, D. M. and G. A. McFarlane. 1989. Fisheries production domains in the northeast Pacific Ocean. Pp. 359 379 In: Effects of ocean variability on recruitment and an evaluation of parameters used in stock assessment models. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 108. 79 Ware, D. M. and R. E. Thompson. 1991. Link between long term variability in upwelling and fish production in the northeast Pacific Ocean. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48: 2296 2306.

Washington Department Fish and Wildlife and Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. 1994. Status Report Columbia River Fish Runs and Fisheries 1938 1993. August 1994. 257 p.

Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 1995. Letter from Bruce Crawford, Assistant Director, Fish Management Program, WDFW, to Garth Griffin, Chief, Protected Species Branch, NMFS. Letter dated October 27, 1995. 9p.

Wells, Wade G. 1987. The effects of fire on the generation of debris flows in southern California. Geological Society of America. Reviews in Engineering Geology. Volume VII. Pp. 105 114.

White, W. B. 1982. Traveling wave like mesoscale perturbations in the North Pacific Current. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 12: 231 243.

White, W. B., R. Bernstein, G. McNally, S. Pazan, and R. Dickson. 1980. The thermocline response to transient atmospheric forcing in the interior midlatitude North Pacific, 1976 1978. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 10: 372 384.

Wickett, W. P. 1967. Ekman transport and zooplankton concentration in the North Pacific Ocean. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 24: 581 594.

Wilburn, J. 1985. Redwood forest. Outdoor California, January February 1985: 13 16.

Wilderness Society The. 1993. The living landscape. Pacific salmon and federal lands: a regional analysis. Bolle Center for Forest Ecosystem Management. Volume 2. 88 pages + appedicies.

Withler, F. C. 1982. Transplanting Pacific salmon. Can. Tec. Rpt. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1079. 27p.

Wood, J. W. 1979. Diseases of Pacific salmon  their prevention and treatment. State of Washington Department of Fisheries, Hatchery Division. 82p.

Wood, C. 1987. Predation of juvenile Pacific salmon by the common merganser ( Mergus merganser) on Eastern Vancouver Island. I: Predation during the seaward migration. Canadian J. Fish. Aqua. Sci. 44: 941 949.

Woodward Clyde Consultants. 1976. Aggregate extraction in Yolo County a study of impacts and management alternatives. Aggregate Resources Advisory Committee, County of Yolo Planning Department. 80 Appendix A. Impacts of sedimentation on aquatic ecosystems ( Koski and Walter 1978)

I. Inorganic Sediment Input A. Changes in salmonid spawning habitat 1. Suffocation of eggs and alevins 2. Blockage of fry emergence 3. Change in timing of fry emergence 4. Reduction of size of fry at emergence 5. Interference with homing ability of adults B. Changes in salmonid rearing habitat 1. Reduction in living space and shelter 2. Change in food availability 3. Increase in emigration C. Changes affecting macroinvertebrates 1. Reduction in living space around rocks 2. Reduction in food ( periphyton) 3. Increase in drift rate 4. Prevention of larval development and emergence D. Changes affecting aquatic plants and algae 1. Reduction in photosynthetic rate 2. Reduction in abundance by dislodgement and deposition II. Input of Organic debris A. Fine organic debris 1. Reduction of dissolved oxygen 2. Production of slime bacteria 3. Loss of habitat for riffle dwelling benthic invertebrates and algae B. Large organic debris 1. Debris jams a. Blockage or delay of juvenile and adult fish migration b. Cover spawning and rearing areas 2. Washout of debris jams a. Release of fine sediment b. Scour and destruction of benthic invertebrates and salmon eggs and alevins 3. Contribution to channel and streambank instability by diversion of streamflow and washout


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23291-23292]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09085]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP16-116-000; PF15-14-000]

Texas LNG Brownsville LLC; Notice of Application

    Take notice that on March 31, 2016, Texas LNG Brownsville LLC
(Texas LNG), 2800 North Loop West, Suite 910, Houston, Texas 77092,
filed an application pursuant to section 3(a) of the Natural Gas Act
(NGA) and Part 153 of the Commission's Regulations, requesting
authorization to site, construct, modify, and operate a new liquefied
natural gas export terminal (Texas LNG Project) located in the Port of
Brownsville, Texas. The filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number
excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY
(202) 502-8659.
    Any questions regarding this application should be directed to
Langtry Meyer, Chief Operating Officer, Texas LNG Brownsville LLC, 2800
North Loop West, Suite 910, Houston, Texas 77092, telephone (832) 849-
4920, or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Specifically, Texas LNG proposes to construct two 2 million ton per
annum liquefaction trains; two single containment, 210,000 cubic meter
capacity, storage tanks; one LNG carrier berth and dredged maneuvering
basin; and all necessary ancillary and support facilities. These
facilities will enable Texas LNG to liquefy and export up to 0.6
billion cubic feet of natural gas per day. Texas LNG states it will
receive natural gas via a non-jurisdictional intrastate natural gas
pipeline.
    On April 14, 2015, the Commission staff granted Texas LNG's request
to use the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Pre-Filing Process
and assigned Docket No. PF15-14-000 to staff activities involving the
proposed facilities. Now, as of the filing of this application on March
31, 2016, the NEPA Pre-Filing Process for this project has ended. From
this time forward, this proceeding will be conducted in Docket

No. CP16-116-000, as noted in the caption of this Notice.
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding, or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule will serve to
notify federal and state agencies of the timing for the completion of
all necessary reviews, and the subsequent need to complete all federal
authorizations within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission
staff's FEIS or EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 5 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a
copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    Motions to intervene, protests and comments may be filed
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper; see, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 5, 2016.

    Dated: April 14, 2016.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-09085 Filed 4-19-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P