[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 198 (Friday, October 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 62014]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24443]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EF11-11-001]

Western Area Power Administration; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on September 17, 2013, the Western Area Power
Administration submitted its Rate Order No. WAPA-1626, concerning
extension of the Parker-Davis Project firm electric and transmission
service formula rates, for confirmation and approval on a final basis
effective October 1, 2013, and ending September 30, 2018.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on October 17, 2013.

    Dated: October 3, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-24443 Filed 10-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 43 (Monday, March 5, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9249-9252]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04366]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0056]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Charleston Race Week, Charleston Harbor, Charleston,
SC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
on the waters of the Charleston Harbor in Charleston, South Carolina
during Charleston Race Week. Charleston Race Week is a series of sail
boat races throughout Charleston Harbor. The safety zone is necessary
to ensure the safety of participants, spectators, and the general
public during the event. This regulation prohibits persons and vessels
from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within
the safety zones unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
Charleston or a designated representative.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before March 20, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0056 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further instructions on
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Justin Heck, Sector
Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843)
740-3184, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive Order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On January 14, 2018, the Charleston Ocean Racing Association
notified the Coast Guard that it will be sponsoring a series of
sailboat races from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m., on April 12, 2018 through
April 15, 2018. The purpose of the rule is to ensure the safety of the
event participants, the general public, vessels and the navigable
waters during Charleston Race Week.
    The Coast Guard is requesting that interested parties provide
comments within a shortened comment period of 15 days instead of a
standard 30 days for this notice of proposed rulemaking. The Coast
Guard believes a shortened comment period is necessary and reasonable
because the safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of event
participants, the general public, vessels and these navigable waters
during the race. Any delay in making this final rule effective by
allowing comments for more than 15 days would not be in the best
interest of public safety.
    The legal basis for the proposed rule is the Coast Guard's
authority to establish regulated safety zones and other limited access
areas is 33 U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on the waters
of the Charleston Harbor in Charleston, South Carolina during
Charleston Race Week. The races are scheduled to take place from 9 a.m.
to 5 p.m., on April 12, 2018, through April 15, 2018. Approximately 250
sailboats are anticipated to participate in the races, and
approximately 30 spectator vessels are expected to attend the event.
Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the safety zone may contact the Captain of the Port
Charleston by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or a designated
representative via VHF radio on channel 16 to request authorization. If
authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within
the safety zone is granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the
Port Charleston or a designated representative. The Coast Guard will
provide notice of the safety zone by Local Notice to Mariners,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene designated representatives.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and executive orders.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on: (1) Although
persons and vessels may not enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the safety zone without authorization from the Captain of
the Port Charleston or a designated representative, they may operate in
the surrounding area during the enforcement period; and (2) the Coast
Guard will provide advance notification of the safety zone to the local
maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to
Mariners

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or

more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government
and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this
proposed rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, which guides the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves a safety zone that will prohibit persons and vessels from
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within a
limited area on the waters of the Charleston Harbor. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph
L60 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01,
Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration supporting
this determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, 160.5; and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. Add a temporary Sec.  165.T07-0056 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T07-0056  Safety Zone; Charleston Race Week, Charleston
Harbor, Charleston, SC.

    (a) Location. The rule consists of the following four race areas.
    (1) Race Area #1. All waters of the Charleston Harbor encompassed
within a 700 yard radius of position 32[deg]46'10'' N, 079[deg]55'15''
W.
    (2) Race Area #2. All waters of the Charleston Harbor encompassed
within a 700 yard radius of position 32[deg]46'02'' N, 079[deg]54'15''
W.
    (3) Race Area #3. All waters of the Charleston Harbor encompassed
within a 700 yard radius of position 32[deg]45'55'' N, 079[deg]53'39''
W.
    (4) Race Area #4. All waters of the Charleston Harbor encompassed
within a 600 yard radius of position 32[deg]47'40'' N, 079[deg]55'10''
W.
    (5) Race Area #5. All waters of the Charleston Harbor and Entrance
Channel encompassed within a 500 yard radius of position 32[deg]45'34''
N, 79[deg]52'09'' W continuing to Charleston Entrance Channel Buoys
Green 11 (LLN 2395.5) and Red 12 (LLN 2400).
    (b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Charleston in the enforcement of the regulated
areas.
    (c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the
regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston
or a designated representative.
    (2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, or
remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the Port
Charleston by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or a designated representative
via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization. If authorization
to enter, transit through, or remain within the regulated area is
granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated
representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Charleston
or a designated representative.
    (3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene
designated representatives.
    (d) Enforcement period. This rule will be enforced from 9 a.m.
until 5 p.m., on April 12, 2018, through April 15, 2018.

    Dated: February 27, 2018.
J.W. Reed,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2018-04366 Filed 3-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


        Docket Memo for Environmental Defense Fund GNP Stakeholder Meeting
 Rulemaking:  Federal Implementation Plan Addressing Regional Ozone Transport for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (2015 Good Neighbor Plan)
 Topics Discussed:  Inflation Reduction Act, West Virginia v EPA, backstop daily emissions limits
 Date: 08/25/22

EPA Attendees:
Liz Selbst
Scott Mathias
Beth Murray
Brian Fisher
George Bowker
Emily Seidman
Dan Schramm
Rosemary Kaban
Jeanhee Hong
Matt Marks
Gautam Srinivasan

EDF Attendees:
Sean Donohue
Vickie Patton
Trish McCubbin
Noha Haggag
Grace Weatherall
Richard Yates
Michael Panfil


[Federal Register: March 11, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 46)]
[Notices]
[Page 10569]
[DOCID:fr11mr09-60]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER99-2923-005]

Phelps Dodge Energy Services, LLC; Notice of Filing

March 2, 2009.
    Take notice that on February 13, 2009, Phelps Dodge Energy
Services, LLC filed a compliance filing to revise its Market-based Rate
Tariff, pursuant to Order No. 697.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 6, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-5217 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 123 (Monday, June 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37381-37382]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16006]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon written request, copies available from: U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 15g-2; SEC File No. 270-381; OMB Control No. 3235-0434.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
    The ``Penny Stock Disclosure Rules'' (Rule 15g-2, 17 CFR 240.15g-2)
require broker-dealers to provide their customers with a risk
disclosure document, as set forth in Schedule 15G, prior to their first
non-exempt transaction in a ``penny stock.'' As amended, the rule
requires broker-dealers to obtain written acknowledgement from the
customer that he or she has received the required risk disclosure
document. The amended rule also requires broker-dealers to maintain a
copy of the customer's written acknowledgement for at least three years
following the date on which the risk disclosure document was provided
to the customer, the first two years in an accessible place.
    The risk disclosure documents are for the benefit of the customers,
to assure that they are aware of the risks of trading in ``penny
stocks'' before they enter into a transaction. The risk disclosure
documents are maintained by the broker-dealers and may be reviewed
during the course of an examination by the Commission.
    There are approximately 253 broker-dealers that could potentially
be subject to current Rule 15g-2. The Commission estimates that
approximately 5% of registered broker-dealers are engaged in penny
stock transactions, and thereby subject to the Rule (5% x approximately
5,063 registered broker-dealers = 253 broker-dealers). The Commission
estimates that each one of these firms processes an average of three
new customers for penny stocks per week. Thus, each respondent
processes approximately 156 penny stock disclosure documents per year.
If communications in tangible form alone are used to satisfy the
requirements of Rule 15g-2, then the copying and mailing of the penny
stock disclosure document takes no more than two minutes. Thus, the
total associated burden is approximately 2 minutes per response, or an
aggregate total of 312 minutes per respondent. Since there are 253
respondents, the current annual burden is 78,936 minutes (312 minutes
per each of the 253 respondents) or 1,316 hours for this third party
disclosure burden. In addition, broker-dealers incur a recordkeeping
burden of approximately two minutes per response when filing the
completed penny stock disclosure documents as required pursuant to the
Rule 15(g)(2)(c), which requires a broker-dealer to preserve a copy of
the written acknowledgement pursuant to Rule 17a-4(b) of the Exchange
Act,. Since there are approximately 156 responses for each respondent,
the respondents incur an aggregate recordkeeping burden of 78,936
minutes (253 respondents x 156 responses for each x 2 minutes per
response) or 1,316 hours, under Rule 15g-2. Accordingly, the current
aggregate annual hour burden associated with Rule 15g-2 (that is,
assuming that all respondents provide tangible copies of the required
documents) is approximately 2,632 hours (1,316 third party disclosure
hours + 1,316 recordkeeping hours).
    The burden hours associated with Rule 15g-2 may be slightly reduced
when the penny stock disclosure document required under the rule is
provided through electronic means such as e-mail from the broker-dealer
(e.g., the broker-dealer respondent may take only one minute, instead
of the two minutes estimated above, to provide the penny stock
disclosure document by e-mail to its customer). In this regard, if each
of the customer respondents estimated above communicates with his or
her broker-dealer electronically, the total ongoing respondent burden
is approximately 1 minute per response, or an aggregate total of 156
minutes (156 customers x 1 minutes per respondent). Assuming 253
respondents, the annual third party disclosure burden, if electronic
communications were used by all customers, is 39,468 minutes (156
minutes per each of the 253 respondents) or 658 hours. If all
respondents were to use electronic means, the recordkeeping burden is
78,936 minutes or 1,316 hours (the same as above). Thus, if all broker-
dealer respondents obtain and send the documents required under the
rules electronically, the aggregate annual hour burden associated with
Rule 15g-2 is 1,974 (658 hours + 1,316 hours).
    In addition, if the penny stock customer requests a paper copy of
the information on the Commission's Web site regarding microcap
securities, including penny stocks, from his or her broker-dealer, the
printing and mailing of the document containing this information takes
no more than two minutes per customer. Because many investors have
access to the Commission's Web site via computers located in their
homes, or in easily accessible public places such as libraries, then,
at most, a quarter of customers who are required to receive the Rule
15g-2 disclosure document request that their broker-dealer provide them
with the additional microcap and penny stock information posted on the
Commission's Web site. Thus, each broker-dealer respondent processes
approximately 39 requests for paper copies of this information per year
or an aggregate total of 78 minutes per respondent (2 minutes per
customer x 39 requests per respondent). Since there are 253
respondents, the estimated annual burden is 19,734 minutes (78 minutes
per each of the 253 respondents) or 329 hours. This is a third party
disclosure type of burden.
    We have no way of knowing how many broker-dealers and customers
will choose to communicate electronically. Assuming that 50 percent of
respondents continue to provide documents and obtain signatures in
tangible form and 50 percent choose to communicate electronically to
satisfy the requirements of Rule 15g-2, the total aggregate burden
hours is 3,948 ((aggregate burden hours for documents and signatures in
tangible form x 0.50 of the respondents = 1,316 hours) + (aggregate
burden hours for electronically signed and transmitted documents x 0.50
of the respondents = 987 hours) + (aggregate burden hours for
recordkeeping of tangible documents x 0.50 of the respondents = 658) +
(aggregate burden hours for

recordkeeping of electronically filed documents = 658) + (329 burden
hours for those customers making requests for a copy of the information
on the Commission's Web site)).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    The Commission may not conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No
person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a
collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a
valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number.
    Comments should be directed to: Thomas Bayer, Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Remi Pavlik-Simon,
6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312 or send an e-mail
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted within 60 days of
this notice.

    June 21, 2011.
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-16006 Filed 6-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P