[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 4, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26315-26317]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09499]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2022-0164]
RIN 1625-AA08

Special Local Regulation: Riviera Race Weekend, Riviera Beach, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary special local
regulation (SLR) on certain navigable waters of the Atlantic Ocean off
Riviera Beach, FL, in connection with the Riviera Race Weekend event.
The SLR is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from potential hazards associated with the high speed jet
ski race. Entry of vessels or persons into the regulated area is
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) Miami. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 3, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2022-0164 using the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email LTJG Benjamin Adrien, Sector Miami
Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On February 17th, 2022, the National Watersports Asssociation
Racing organization notified the Coast Guard that it will be conducting
a high speed jet ski race from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. on June 4, 2022. and
June 5, 2022. The race will be conducted off the beach in Riviera
Beach, FL. The race will consist of fifteen high speed personal
watercraft (jet ski) racing within a pre designated course.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the navigable waters within 500 feet of the designated race course
before, during, and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard is
proposing this rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP is proposing to establish a temporary SLR from 9 a.m.
until 6 p.m.

on June 4, 2022, and 5, 2022. The SLR would cover certain navigable
waters of the Atlantic Ocean off Riviera Beach, FL. The duration of the
zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment in these navigable waters during the high speed jet ski
race. The temporary SLR would prohibit all persons and vessels, except
those persons and vessels participating in the race, from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the area unless
authorized by the COTP Miami or a designated representative. Persons
and vessels may request authorization to enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within the race area by contacting the COTP Miami by
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or a designated representative via VHF
radio on channel 16. If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within the race area is granted by the COTP Miami or a
designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the instructions of the COTP Miami or a
designated representative. The Coast Guard would provide notice of the
special local regulation by a Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-
scene designated representatives. The regulatory text we are proposing
appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the following
reasons: (1) The temporary special local regulation (SLR) will be
enforced for approximately 9 hours per day; a total of 18 hours; (2)
although persons and vessels will not be able to enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area, without
authorization from the COTP Miami or a designated representative, they
may operate in the surrounding area during the enforcement period; (3)
persons and vessels may still enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area during the enforcement period if
authorized by the COTP Miami or a designated representative; and (4)
the Coast Guard will provide advance notification of the temporary
(SLR) to the local maritime community through the Local Notice to
Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the potential effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a
temporary SLR lasting approximately 9 hours on two separate days that
will prohibit entry of persons or vessels during the Riviera Race

Weekend event. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L61 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available
in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To
do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2022-0164 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If you cannot submit your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate
instructions.
    Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. We review all comments received, but we will only
post comments that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may
choose not to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that
we receive.
    Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal
information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions
to the docket in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05-1.

0
2. Add Sec.  100.T0799-0164 to read as follows:

Sec.  100.T0799-0164   Special Local Regulation: Riviera Race Weekend;
Atlantic Ocean, Riviera Beach, FL.

    (a) Location. The following regulated area is established as a
special local regulation in the Atlantic Ocean; Riviera Beach, FL.
Coordinates are based on North American Datum 1983.
    (1) Regulated area. All navigable waters of the Atlantic Ocean
encompassed within the following points: Commence at Point A in
position 26[deg]46'51'' N, 080[deg]01'53'' W; thence east to Point B in
position 26[deg]46'51'' N, 080[deg]01'41'' W; thence north to Point C
in position 26[deg]47'08'' N, 080[deg]01'41'' W; thence west to Point D
in position 26[deg]47'08'' N, 080[deg]01'53'' W; thence southwest to
Point A.
    (2) [Reserved]
    (b) Definitions. (1) The term designated representative means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, State, and Local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port (COTP) Miami in the enforcement of the regulated
areas.
    (2) The term Patrol Commander means a commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer of the Coast Guard who has been designated by the
respective Coast Guard Sector Commander to enforce this section.
    (3) The term spectators means all persons and vessels not
registered with the event sponsor as participants or official patrol
vessels.
    (c) Regulations. (1) All non-participant vessels, spectators, and
persons are prohibited from entering, transiting, anchoring in, or
remaining within the regulated area unless authorized by the COTP or a
designated representative.
    (2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area may contact the COTP Miami by
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or a designated representative via VHF-FM
radio on channel 16, to request authorization. If authorization is
granted, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization must
comply with the instructions of the COTP Miami or a designated
representative.
    (3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area
through Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM channel 16, on-scene
designated representatives, and Local Notice to Mariners.
    (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 9 a.m.
until 6 p.m. each day on June 4, 2022, and June 5, 2022.

    Dated: April 28, 2022.
J.F. Burdian,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Miami.
[FR Doc. 2022-09499 Filed 5-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: May 7, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 87)]
[Notices]
[Page 21424-21425]
[DOCID:fr07my09-140]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59852; File No. SR-Phlx-2009-39]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. Relating
To Trading Post/Booth and Registration Fees

April 30, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on April 24, 2009, NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. (``Phlx'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's Fee Schedule to: (1)
Rename the Trading Post/Booth fee and increase the fee from $250 to
$300 per month; (2) designate certain space on the trading floor as
Market Maker Trading Space and assess members a fee of $300 per month;
(3) eliminate the Trading Post with Kiosk fee of $375 per month and
replace it with a Specialist Post fee of $4,500 per month for a full
post and $1,125 per month for a quarter post, up to a maximum of
$4,500; (4) increase the Floor Facility fee from $125 to $200 per
month; (5) increase the Trading Floor Personnel Registration fee from
$25 to $50 per month; and (6) make other minor amendments to the Fee
Schedule.
    While changes to the Exchange's fee schedule pursuant to this
proposal are effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated this
proposal to be effective on May 1, 2009.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQOMXPHLX/
Filings/, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to increase the costs of
certain floor-related charges due to a rise in occupancy expenses. The
Exchange proposes to adjust its fees related to certain trading floor
charges to keep pace with the rising overhead costs associated with
maintaining the trading floor. The Exchange has not made any
significant changes to these fees in several years.
    The Exchange proposes to increase the Trading Post/Booth fee from
$250 to $300 per month. The Trading Post/Booth space is physical space
on the Exchange's trading floor, which space typically is used by floor
brokers. The Exchange proposes to increase this fee to cover increasing
occupancy costs, such as electricity usage due to the increase of
member computers on the trading floor. Additionally, the Exchange
proposes to rename the Trading Post/Booth fee as the ``Trading/
Administrative Booths and Market Maker Trading Space'' fee. The
Exchange proposes to designate certain space on the trading floor to be
termed as ``Market Maker Trading Space'' and assess members $300 per
month for that space. The Exchange would clearly define space where
Register Options Traders could locate computer and related equipment
required to function as a Streaming Quote Trader.\3\ The Exchange
proposes to implement this fee to cover increasing costs associated
with the trading floor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ A Streaming Quote Trader or SQT is an Exchange Registered
Options Trader (``ROT'') who has received permission from the
Exchange to generate and submit option quotations electronically
through an electronic interface with AUTOM via an Exchange approved
proprietary electronic quoting device in eligible options to which
such SQT is assigned. See Exchange Rule 1014(b)(ii)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to eliminate the Trading Post with Kiosk fee
of $375. The kiosk is an open, flat surface that contains computer
terminals and allows specialists to face the trading crowd. The fee is
currently imposed on specialists with a trading post with kiosk on the
trading floor. Instead, the Exchange proposes to adopt a Specialist
Post fee which would vary with the size of the post. Specialists would
be assessed a Specialist Post fee of $1,125 per month for a quarter
post and $4,500 per month for a full post with a maximum fee of $4,500
per month. Currently the specialists have multiple, contiguous, trading
posts with kiosks on the trading floor. This fee should result in no
additional increase to the specialists currently on the trading floor
as the total amount paid currently for each trading post with kiosk, or
$375, multiplied by the total number of posts utilized is equivalent to
the fee range of the proposed charges, $1,125 for a quarter post and
$4,500 for a full post, per month. Additionally, the Exchange is
capping the total amount of fees paid by a specialist for the
Specialist Post fee at $4,500 per month. The posts would continue to
facilitate specialist interaction with the trading crowd.
    The Exchange proposes to increase the Floor Facility fee from $125
to $200 per month. The Floor Facility fee is applicable to floor
members and foreign currency options participants that are not
currently assessed fees related to the usage of a Trading Post/Booth
and would not be assessed a Trading/Administrative Booths and Market
Maker Trading Space fee. The Floor Facility fee is intended to fairly
allocate costs attendant to providing members and participants with
services necessary to the conduct of business on the floor of the
Exchange. The Exchange proposes to increase this fee to offset the
increased costs of operating a trading floor facility.
    The Exchange also proposes increasing the Trading Floor Personnel
Registration fee from $25 to $50 per month. Pursuant to Exchange Rule
620 \4\ all trading floor personnel are required to be registered with
the Exchange. This

fee is imposed on members and participant organizations for individuals
who are employed by such member or participant organizations and who
work on the Exchange's trading floor, such as clerks, interns, stock
execution clerks and other associated persons, but who are not
registered as members or participants. The Exchange proposes to
increase this fee to offset the rising occupancy costs associated with
operating a trading floor facility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Exchange Rule 620(a), titled Trading Floor Personnel
Registration, ``Each Floor Broker, Specialist and Registered Options
Trader on any Exchange trading floor must register as such with the
Exchange. * * *''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to make a minor amendment to its Fee
Schedule to amend the title of Section II of the Fee Schedule.
Currently that section is titled Index Options Fees and the Exchange
proposes to amend that section title to ``Sector Index Options Fees.''
This title would be amended in the Table of Contents as well as in
Section II of the Fee Schedule. The Exchange believes that the wording
``Sector Index Options Fees'' is a more appropriate title for these
products.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its schedule of
fees is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \5\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \6\ in
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees
and other charges among Exchange members. The Exchange believes that
the proposed increases in fees to the associated Trading/Administrative
Booths and Market Maker Trading Space, Floor Facility and Trading Floor
Personnel fees are reasonable and the revenue will assist the Exchange
in defraying the occupancy costs of maintaining the floor facility for
its members. The Specialist Post fee should not result in a fee
increase for specialists. The Exchange believes that because
specialists pay significantly more total transaction fees on a monthly
basis than similar fees assessed on Register Options Traders and floor
brokers, the proposed fees are reasonable. Finally, the Exchange
believes that the amendment to the title of Section II is a proper
title to identify fees in the Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \7\ and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4 \8\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2009-39 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2009-39. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the self-regulatory
organization. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
Phlx-2009-39 and should be submitted on or before May 28, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-10524 Filed 5-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 91 (Friday, May 10, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20546-20547]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09647]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2019-0292]

Safety Zones; Recurring Safety Zones in Captain of the Port Sault
Sainte Marie--Mackinaw Area Visitors Bureau Friday Night Fireworks

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce certain safety zones for the
Mackinaw Area Visitors Bureau Friday Night Fireworks in Mackinaw City,
Michigan, starting in May, 2019 to provide for the safety of life on
navigable waterways. This action is necessary and intended to protect
the safety of life and property on navigable waters prior to, during,
and immediately after these events. During the enforcement period, no
person or vessel may enter the respective safety zone without the
permission of the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie or a
designated representative.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.918 will be enforced for safety
zone (1), Table 165.918, from 9 p.m. through 11:59 p.m. each Friday, or
Saturday in case of inclement weather, from May 17, 2019, through
August 30, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notice of enforcement, call or email MST2 Blackledge, Waterways
Management, Coast Guard Sector Sault Sainte Marie, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the Mackinaw
Area Visitors Bureau Friday Night Fireworks safety zones listed as item
(1) in Table 165.918 of 33 CFR 165.918 from 9 p.m. through 11:19 p.m.
every Friday, or Saturday in case of inclement weather, from May 17,
2019 through August 30, 2019.
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte
Marie or a designated on-scene representative. Those seeking permission
to enter the safety zone may request permission from the Captain of
Sault Sainte Marie via channel 16, VHF-FM. Vessels and persons granted
permission to enter the safety zone shall obey the directions of the
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie or his designated
representative. While within a safety zone, all vessels shall operate
at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course.
    This notice of enforcement is issued under authority of 33 CFR
165.918, Safety Zones; Recurring safety zones in Captain of the Port
Sault Sainte Marie zone, and 5 U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this
publication in the Federal Register, the Coast Guard will provide the
maritime community with advance notification of this enforcement period
via Broadcast Notice to Mariners or Local Notice to Mariners. If the
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie determines that the safety zone
need not be enforced for the full duration stated in this notice he or
she may use a Broadcast Notice to Mariners to grant general permission
to enter the respective safety zone.

    Dated: April 3, 2019.
P.S. Nelson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie.
[FR Doc. 2019-09647 Filed 5-9-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 141 (Monday, July 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43069-43070]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17821]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC12-117-000.
    Applicants: Mission Funding Alpha.
    Description: Application for Authorization for Disposition of
Jurisdictional Facilities and Request for Expedited Action of Mission
Funding Alpha.
    Filed Date: 7/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120713-5194.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/3/12.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG12-87-000.
    Applicants: Los Vientos Windpower IA, LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator of
Los Vientos Windpower IA, LLC.
    Filed Date: 7/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120713-5139.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/3/12.

    Docket Numbers: EG12-88-000.
    Applicants: Los Vientos Windpower IB, LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator
Status of Los Vientos Windpower IB, LLC.
    Filed Date: 7/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120713-5140.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/3/12.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2002-001.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Errata to Original Service Agreement No. 3327 Queue
Position T126 to be effective 5/11/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120713-5171.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/3/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2241-000.
    Applicants: Carolina Power & Light Company.
    Description: Service Agreement No. 134 under Carolina Power and
Light Company Joint OATT to be effective 7/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120713-5151.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/3/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2242-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: SA 2455 DEGS Wind-METC J056 GIA 7-13-2012 to be
effective 7/14/2012.

    Filed Date: 7/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120713-5173.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/3/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2243-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits Notice of
Cancellation.
    Filed Date: 7/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120713-5179.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/3/12.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 16, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-17821 Filed 7-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28019-28020]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11758]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL11-39-000]

Gregory R. Swecker, Beverly F. Swecker v. Midland Power
Cooperative, State of Iowa; Notice of Complaint

    Take notice that on May 6, 2011, pursuant to section 210(h)(2)(A)
of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA),\1\
Gregory R. Swecker and Beverly F. Swecker (Complainants) filed a
petition requesting that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission) enforce the requirements of PURPA against Midland Power
Cooperative and the State of Iowa (Respondents), alleging that
Respondents have failed to implement the Commission regulations by
acting in direct contravention of said statutes, rules, orders and
other laws

administered by the Commission and the US Supreme Court.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 16 U.S.C. 824a-3(h)(2) (2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on May 26, 2011.

    Dated: May 9, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-11758 Filed 5-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P