[Federal Register: March 28, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 59)]
[Notices]
[Page 15403]
[DOCID:fr28mr06-47]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR03-11-004]

Enbridge Pipelines (Louisiana Intrastate) LLC; Notice of
Compliance Filing

March 22, 2006.
    Take notice that on February 28, 2006, Enbridge Pipelines
(Louisiana Intrastate) LLC filed its annual revision of the fuel
percentage on its system pursuant to Section 3.2 of its Statement of
Operating Conditions. Louisiana Intrastate seeks an effective date of
April 1, 2006.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken,
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 3, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-4453 Filed 3-27-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 57 (Tuesday, March 25, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 16206]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06529]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 12

[Docket ID: FEMA-2014-0011]
RIN 1660-AA82

Removal of Federal Advisory Committee Act Regulations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the RIN that published in the Federal
Register on March 13, 2014. This final rule removes the regulations
that implement the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) for the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). FEMA's implementation of
FACA is now governed by the rules promulgated by the General Services
Administration (GSA) and by the policies issued by the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).

DATES: Effective Date: April 14, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Program Information: Demaris Belanger,
Group Federal Officer (GFO), Office of the Chief Administrative
Officer, Mission Support Bureau, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Room 706-A, 500 C Street SW., Washington DC, 20472-3000, phone: 202-
212-2182, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Legal Information: Michael Delman, Attorney Advisor, Office of
Chief Counsel, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 8NE, 500 C Street
SW., Washington, DC, 20472-3100, phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rule, (79 FR 14180), beginning
on page 14180 in the Federal Register issue of March 13, 2014, make the
following correction: on page 14180 in the 2nd column in the RIN
section, replace the RIN to read ``RIN 1660-AA82.''

    Dated: March 19, 2014.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014-06529 Filed 3-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-19-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 124 (Friday, June 26, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38338-38340]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13662]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 124 / Friday, June 26, 2020 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0574; Product Identifier 2019-CE-015-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Aerostar Aircraft Corporation Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Aerostar Aircraft Corporation Model PA-60-601P (Aerostar 601P),
PA-60-602P (Aerostar 602P), and PA-60-700P (Aerostar 700P) airplanes.
This proposed AD was prompted by reports of corrosion on the elevator
and aileron balance tubes. This proposed AD would require repetitively
inspecting the elevator and aileron balance tubes for corrosion and
rust and replacing the tube. The FAA is issuing this proposed AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 10,
2020.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Aerostar
Aircraft Corporation, 2265 West Aerostar Way, Hayden Lake, ID 83835;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet: https://aerostaraircraft.com. You may view this service information at the FAA,
You may review this referenced service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0574; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for Docket Operations is listed above. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Herron, Aerospace Engineer,
Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, 2200 S 216th St, Des Moines, WA 98198; phone:
(206) 231-3544; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2020-0574;
Product Identifier 2019-CE-015-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
The FAA specifically invites comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. The FAA will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
NPRM because of those comments.
    The FAA will post all comments received, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide.
The FAA will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.

Discussion

    The FAA received reports of corrosion on the elevator and aileron
balance tubes. Aerostar Aircraft Corporation (Aerostar) reported that,
during repair of a Model PA-60-601P airplane, corrosion was found on
the balance tubes used in the elevator and aileron systems. Corrosion
on balance tubes in the elevator and aileron system may be hidden by
rubber boots. These balance tubes counteract the effects of cabin
pressurization. The majority of the Aerostar PA-60 airplane fleet have
pressurized cabins. After the finding on the first airplane, Aerostar
inspected four additional airplanes in the PA-60 fleet. Aerostar
reported four out of these five airplanes had corrosion on both the
aileron and elevator balance tubes. This condition, if not addressed,
could result in failure of the aileron and elevator balance tubes. This
failure could cause the aileron and/or elevator balance tubes to jam
and result in loss of control of the airplane.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed Aerostar Service Bulletin SB600-138, dated August
30, 2018. The service bulletin contains procedures for repetitively
inspecting the elevator and aileron balance tubes for corrosion and
rust and replacing the tubes at a specified time and repetitively if
necessary. This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    The FAA is proposing this AD because it evaluated all relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information

    This proposed AD would not require completing the reply card and
returning it to Aerostar as specified in Step 13 of Part II of the
service information.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 404 airplanes of
U.S. registry.
    The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
             Action                   Labor cost          Parts cost       Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspect elevator and aileron      1 work-hour x $85   Not Applicable....  $85 per inspection  $34,340 per
 balance tubes.                    per hour = $85                          cycle.              inspection cycle.
                                   per inspection
                                   cycle.
Replace elevator and aileron      8 work-hours x $85  $1,187............  $1,867............  $754,268.
 balance tubes.                    per hour = $680.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary
replacements that would be required based on the results of the
proposed repetitive inspections, assuming separate replacement
intervals. The FAA has no way of determining the number of airplanes
that might need these replacements:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                    Action                                 Labor cost               Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replace elevator balance tube.................  8 work-hours x $85 per hour =               $594          $1,274
                                                 $680.
Replace aileron balance tube..................  8 work-hours x $85 per hour =                594           1,274
                                                 $680.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Aerostar Aircraft Corporation: Docket No. FAA-2020-0574; Product
Identifier 2019-CE-015-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments by August 10, 2020.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Aerostar Aircraft Corporation Model PA-60-
601P (Aerostar 601P), PA-60-602P (Aerostar 602P), and PA-60-700P
(Aerostar 700P) airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any
category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27; Flight
Controls.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of corrosion on the elevator and
aileron balance tubes. The FAA is issuing this AD to detect
corrosion on the elevator and aileron balance tubes. The unsafe
condition, if not addressed, could result in failure of the aileron
and elevator balance tubes, jamming of the aileron and/or elevator
balance tubes, and loss of control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Repetitive Inspections

    Within 10 hours time-in-service after the effective date of this
AD, inspect the elevator and aileron balance tubes for corrosion
(pitting and flaking) and rust (discoloration) by following steps 1.
through 3. of Part I (Inspection) of the Instructions in Aerostar
Aircraft Corporation Service Bulletin SB600-138, dated August 30,
2018 (Aerostar SB600-138). For each tube replaced as required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, using a borescope, repeat the inspection
within 10 years after replacing the tube and thereafter as follows:
    (1) At intervals not to exceed 10 years as long as no rust is
found.
    (2) At intervals not to exceed 2 years if only rust is found
(without any signs of corrosion).

(h) Replacements

    At the following compliance times, replace each elevator and
aileron balance tube by following Part II (Replacement) of the
Instructions in Aerostar SB600-138, except you are not required to
report information to the manufacturer:
    (1) Before further flight if corrosion or rust is found (inside
or outside the tubes) during the initial inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (2) At the next 100-hour inspection or at the next annual
inspection, whichever occurs first, if no corrosion and no rust is
found (inside or outside the tubes) during the initial inspection
required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (3) Before further flight if corrosion is found (inside or
outside the tubes) during any repetitive inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(j) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact David Herron,
Aerospace Engineer, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, 2200 S 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Aerostar Aircraft Corporation, 2265 West Aerostar Way, Hayden Lake,
ID 83835; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet:
https://aerostaraircraft.com. You may view this service information
at the FAA, You may review this referenced service information at
the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch,
901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued on June 17, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-13662 Filed 6-25-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: March 26, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 57)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 13147-13148]
[DOCID:fr26mr09-29]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0263; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-137-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Model Mystere-Falcon 20-C5,
20-D5, 20-E5, and 20-F5 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued following the
discovery of hot air leaks when operating the wing anti-icing
system. The seals Part Number (P/N) MS29513-325, near the de-icing
valves (12H1) and (12H2) in frame 33 area, do not have the proper
temperature rating. The consequences, in the area of the hot air
leak, are risks of ignition of potential hydraulic leaks.
* * * * *
    The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address
the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 27, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, New Jersey 07606;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet http://www.dassaultfalcon.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0263;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-137-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2008-0123, dated July 2, 2008 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued following the
discovery of hot air leaks when operating the wing anti-icing
system. The seals Part Number (P/N) MS29513-325, near the de-icing
valves (12H1) and (12H2) in frame 33 area, do not have the proper
temperature rating.
    The consequences, in the area of the hot air leak, are risks of
ignition of potential hydraulic leaks.
    The purpose of this AD is to verify that seals with correct
temperature rating have been installed on Mystere-Falcon 20-( )5
airplanes.

    The corrective action includes replacing the left and right seals
near de-icing valves (12H1) and (12H2) in frame area 33. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Dassault has issued Service Bulletin F20-766, dated October 31,
2005. The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 187 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the basic
requirements of

this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $14,960, or $80 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Dassault Aviation (Formerly Avions Marcel Dassault-Breguet Aviation
(AMD/BA)): Docket No. FAA-2009-0263; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-
137-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by April 27, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Mystere-Falcon 20-C5, 20-D5, 20-E5, and
20-F5 airplanes, certificated in any category, without Dassault
Service Bulletin F20-766 implemented.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 30: Ice and
Rain Protection.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued following the
discovery of hot air leaks when operating the wing anti-icing
system. The seals Part Number (P/N) MS29513-325, near the de-icing
valves (12H1) and (12H2) in frame 33 area, do not have the proper
temperature rating.
    The consequences, in the area of the hot air leak, are risks of
ignition of potential hydraulic leaks.
    The purpose of this AD is to verify that seals with correct
temperature rating have been installed on Mystere-Falcon 20-( )5
airplanes.
    The corrective action includes replacing the left and right
seals near de-icing valves (12H1) and (12H2) in frame area 33.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, within 7 months after the effective
date of this AD, perform an inspection for a red line marking on
each of the Wiggins couplings that are located near the de-icing
valves (12H1) and (12H2), in accordance with Dassault Service
Bulletin F20-766, dated October 31, 2005. If a red line is not
found, prior to further flight, replace the seals to the left and
right Wiggins couplings, in accordance with Dassault Service
Bulletin F20-766, dated October 31, 2005.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No Differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-1137; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics
inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2008-0123, dated
July 2, 2008; and Dassault Service Bulletin F20-766, dated October
31, 2005; for related information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 18, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
 [FR Doc. E9-6735 Filed 3-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P