[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 42494]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18098]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Number: PR18-76-000.
    Applicants: Enbridge Pipelines (Oklahoma Transmission) L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)+(g): ECOP name change
to be effective 8/2/2018.
    Filed Date: 8/13/18.
    Accession Number: 20180813-5159.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/4/18.
    284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/12/18.

    Docket Number: PR18-77-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)/: COH Rates effective
July 31 2018.
    Filed Date: 8/14/18.
    Accession Number: 20180814-5047.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/4/18.

    Docket Number: PR18-78-000.
    Applicants: Enbridge Pipelines (North Texas) L.P.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)+(g): EPOT name change
to be effective 8/3/2018.
    Filed Date: 8/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180815-5082.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/5/18.
    284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/18.

    Docket Number: PR18-79-000.
    Applicants: Enbridge Pipelines (East Texas) L.P.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)+(g): EPET name change
to be effective 8/3/2018.
    Filed Date: 8/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180815-5083.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/5/18.
    284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-1056-000.
    Applicants: Northern Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 2018 Carlton Flow Obligations
to be effective 11/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 8/13/18.
    Accession Number: 20180813-5077.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/27/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-1057-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 081518 Negotiated Rates--
Spotlight Energy, LLC R-7725-03 to be effective 10/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 8/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180815-5018.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/27/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-1058-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 081518 Negotiated Rates--
Spotlight Energy, LLC R-7725-04 to be effective 10/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 8/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180815-5019.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/27/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-1059-000.
    Applicants: Old Dominion Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Petition for Temporary Waivers of Capacity Release
Regulations, et al. of Old Dominion Electric Cooperative.
    Filed Date: 8/13/18.
    Accession Number: 20180813-5215.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/27/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be considered,
but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 16, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-18098 Filed 8-21-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 20, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77710-77711]
[FR Doc No: 2022-27545]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0932; Airspace Docket No. 21-AEA-22]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment and Establishment of Area Navigation (RNAV) Routes;
Eastern United States

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects a final rule published by the FAA in the
Federal Register on December 7, 2022, that, in part, amends navigation
(RNAV) routes T-315, and T-325. In the amended route T-315, the final
rule identified the DVANY, WP, CT, route point as a waypoint (WP) in
error. In the amended T-325, the final rule identified the START, IL,
route point and the DEBOW, WI, as WPs in error. This action makes
editorial corrections to the DVANY, CT, START, IL, and DEBOW, WI, WPs
to change them to be reflected as Fixes. This correction is necessary
to match the FAA National Airspace System Resource (NASR) database
information.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, February 23, 2023. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11
and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Rules and Regulations Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    The FAA published a final rule in the Federal Register for Docket
No. FAA-2022-0932, in the Federal Register (87 FR 74962; December 7,
2022) amending, in part, RNAV routes T-315 and T-325. Subsequent to the
publication, the FAA determined that the DVANY, CT, START, IL, and
DEBOW, WI, route points were inadvertently identified as WPs, in error.
The correct reference for the three points is a Fix. This rule corrects
the errors by changing the reference of the DVANY, CT, WP to the DVANY,
CT, Fix; the START, IL, WP to the START, IL, Fix; and the DEBOW, WI, WP
to the DEBOW, WI, Fix.
    These are editorial changes only to match the FAA NASR database
information and do not alter the alignment of routes T-315 or T-325.
    United States RNAV T-routes are published in paragraph 6011, and
RNAV Q-routes are published in paragraph 2006, respectively, of FAA
Order JO 7400.11G, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September 15,
2022, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The RNAV
routes listed in this document will be published subsequently in FAA
Order JO 7400.11.

Correction to Final Rule

    The references to the DEVANY, CT, START, IL, and DEBOW, WI, WPs, as
published in the Federal Register of December 7, 2022 (87 FR 74962), FR
Doc. 2022-26489, is corrected as follows:
    On page 74964, correct the table for T-315 JARLO, WV to Burlington,
VT (BTV) [Amended] to read:

T-315 JARLO, WV to Burlington, VT (BTV) [Amended]

JARLO, WV                                       WP                             (Lat. 38[deg]20'58.85'' N, long. 081[deg]46'11.68'' W)
SHANE, WV                                       WP                             (Lat. 37[deg]58'31.15'' N, long. 080[deg]48'24.34'' W)
DBRAH, VA                                       WP                             (Lat. 37[deg]20'34.14'' N, long. 080[deg]04'10.75'' W)
SPNKS, VA                                       WP                             (Lat. 37[deg]17'21.31'' N, long. 079[deg]33'17.14'' W)
KONRD, VA                                       WP                             (Lat. 37[deg]20'39.83'' N, long. 079[deg]01'33.27'' W)
CRUMB, VA                                       FIX                            (Lat. 37[deg]28'09.44'' N, long. 078[deg]08'27.69'' W)
Flat Rock, VA (FAK)                             VORTAC                         (Lat. 37[deg]31'42.63'' N, long. 077[deg]49'41.59'' W)
WAVES, VA                                       WP                             (Lat. 37[deg]35'13.54'' N, long. 077[deg]26'52.03'' W)
TAPPA, VA                                       FIX                            (Lat. 37[deg]58'12.66'' N, long. 076[deg]50'40.62'' W)
COLIN, VA                                       FIX                            (Lat. 38[deg]05'59.23'' N, long. 076[deg]39'50.85'' W)
SHLBK, MD                                       WP                             (Lat. 38[deg]20'16.21'' N, long. 076[deg]26'10.51'' W)
PRNCZ, MD                                       WP                             (Lat. 38[deg]37'38.10'' N, long. 076[deg]05'08.20'' W)
CHOPS, MD                                       FIX                            (Lat. 38[deg]45'41.81'' N, long. 075[deg]57'36.18'' W)
COSHA, DE                                       WP                             (Lat. 38[deg]57'57.57'' N, long. 075[deg]30'51.59'' W)
Atlantic City, NJ (ACY)                         VORTAC                         (Lat. 39[deg]27'21.15'' N, long. 074[deg]34'34.73'' W)
PANZE, NJ                                       FIX                            (Lat. 39[deg]40'33.58'' N, long. 074[deg]10'05.45'' W)
DIXIE, NJ                                       FIX                            (Lat. 40[deg]05'57.72'' N, long. 074[deg]09'52.17'' W)
Kennedy, NY (JFK)                               VOR/DME                        (Lat. 40[deg]37'58.40'' N, long. 073[deg]46'17.00'' W)
KEEPM, NY                                       FIX                            (Lat. 40[deg]50'14.77'' N, long. 073[deg]32'42.58'' W)
TRANZ, NY                                       FIX                            (Lat. 40[deg]51'31.95'' N, long. 073[deg]22'30.80'' W)
PUGGS, NY                                       FIX                            (Lat. 40[deg]56'27.65'' N, long. 073[deg]13'47.73'' W)
EEGOR, CT                                       WP                             (Lat. 41[deg]09'38.94'' N, long. 073[deg]07'27.66'' W)
Hartford, CT (HFD)                              VOR/DME                        (Lat. 41[deg]38'27.98'' N, long. 072[deg]32'50.70'' W)
DVANY, CT                                       FIX                            (Lat. 41[deg]51'44.56'' N, long. 072[deg]18'11.25'' W)
Gardner, MA (GDM)                               VOR/DME                        (Lat. 42[deg]32'45.31'' N, long. 072[deg]03'29.48'' W)
KEYNN, NH                                       WP                             (Lat. 42[deg]47'39.99'' N, long. 072[deg]17'30.35'' W)
EBERT, VT                                       FIX                            (Lat. 43[deg]32'58.08'' N, long. 072[deg]45'42.45'' W)
Burlington, VT (BTV)                            VOR/DME                        (Lat. 44[deg]23'49.58'' N, long. 073[deg]10'57.48'' W)

* * * * *

    On page 74964, correct the table for T-325 RAMRD, KY to Oshkosh, WI
(OSH) [Amended] to read:

T-325 RAMRD, KY to Oshkosh, WI (OSH) [Amended]

RAMRD, KY                                       WP                             (Lat. 36[deg]55'44.04'' N, long. 086[deg]26'36.58'' W)
RENRO, KY                                       WP                             (Lat. 37[deg]28'50.53'' N, long. 086[deg]39'19.25'' W)
APALO, IN                                       FIX                            (Lat. 38[deg]00'20.59'' N, long. 086[deg]51'35.27'' W)
JIBKA, IN                                       WP                             (Lat. 39[deg]30'08.93'' N, long. 087[deg]16'26.74'' W)
SMARS, IL                                       WP                             (Lat. 41[deg]07'38.18'' N, long. 088[deg]51'38.22'' W)
TRENM, IL                                       WP                             (Lat. 41[deg]17'24.93'' N, long. 089[deg]00'27.53'' W)
START, IL                                       FIX                            (Lat. 41[deg]45'24.83'' N, long. 089[deg]00'21.81'' W)
GRIFT, IL                                       WP                             (Lat. 42[deg]17'28.14'' N, long. 088[deg]53'41.42'' W)
DEBOW, WI                                       FIX                            (Lat. 42[deg]44'08.30'' N, long. 088[deg]50'48.92'' W)
LUNGS, WI                                       WP                             (Lat. 43[deg]02'43.66'' N, long. 088[deg]56'54.86'' W)
HOMNY, WI                                       WP                             (Lat. 43[deg]31'02.22'' N, long. 088[deg]39'40.15'' W)
Oshkosh, WI (OSH)                               VORTAC                         (Lat. 43[deg]59'25.56'' N, long. 088[deg]33'21.36'' W)

* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 15, 2022.
Scott M. Rosenbloom,
Manager, Airspace Rules and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2022-27545 Filed 12-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 27, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 52872-52875]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20845]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0702; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-181-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; 328 Support Services GmbH (Type
Certificate Previously Held by AvCraft Aerospace GmbH; Fairchild
Dornier GmbH; Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede airworthiness directive (AD) 2008-14-
16 that applies to certain 328 Support Services GmbH (Type Certificate
Previously Held by AvCraft Aerospace GmbH; Fairchild Dornier GmbH;
Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH) Model 328-100 and 328-300 airplanes. AD 2008-
14-16 currently requires installing warning placards on the inside of
the passenger door and service doors and modifying the hinge supports
and support struts of the passenger doors. Since we issued AD 2008-14-
16, we received reports that certain fasteners, which were installed as
part of the modification, are the wrong length. This proposed AD would
require replacing the fasteners which were installed as part of the
modification with new fasteners of the correct length, adds new
airplanes, and removes one airplane. We are proposing this AD to
prevent incidents of inadvertent opening and possible detachment of a
passenger door in-flight, resulting in damage to airframe and systems
and loss of control of the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 11,
2013.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact 328
Support Services GmbH, Global Support Center, P.O. Box 1252, D-82231
Wessling, Federal Republic of Germany; telephone +49 8153 88111 6666;
fax +49 8153 88111 6565; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.328support.de. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,

International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2013-0702;
Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-181-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On July 17, 2008, we issued AD 2008-14-16, Amendment 39-15611 (73
FR 40955, July 17, 2008). AD 2008-14-16 required actions intended to
address an unsafe condition on 328 Support Services GmbH (Type
Certificate Previously Held by AvCraft Aerospace GmbH; Fairchild
Dornier GmbH; Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH) Model 328-100 and Model 328-300
airplanes.
    Since we issued AD 2008-14-16, Amendment 39-15611 (73 FR 40955,
July 17, 2008), we received reports that certain fasteners which were
installed as part of the modification are the wrong length and need to
be replaced. The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the
aviation authority for the Member States of the European Community, has
issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2012-0183R1, dated September 28,
2012 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

At least one incident occurred where, immediately after take-off,
the passenger door of a Dornier 328 aeroplane completely opened. The
flight crew reportedly had no cockpit indication or audible chime
prior to this event. The aeroplane returned to the departure
airfield and made an uneventful emergency landing. Substantial
damage to the door, handrails, door hinge arms and fuselage skin
were found.

The subsequent investigation could not find any deficiency in the
design of the main cabin door locking mechanism. In addition, no
technical failure could be determined that precipitated the event.
The flight data recorder showed that the door was closed and locked
before take-off and opened shortly afterwards. Although final proof
could not be obtained, the most likely way in which the door opened
was that the door handle was inadvertently operated during the take-
off run.

In response to the incident, AvCraft (the TC holder at the time)
developed a placard set to warn the occupants against touching the
door handle, as well as a structural modification of the passenger
door hinge supports described in [Dornier 328 Support Services]
Service Bulletin (SB) SB-328-52-460 and SB-328J-52-213 to make
certain that the door does not separate from the aeroplane when
inadvertently opened during flight, allowing a safe descent and
landing.

EASA issued AD 2007-0199 to require the installation of warning
placards and modification as detailed in these SB instructions.

Since that AD [2007-0199] was issued, 328 Support Services GmbH (the
current type certificate holder) have determined that certain
fasteners, identified by Part Number (P/N) NAS6703U1 and P/N
NAS6703U2, which were installed as part of the modification, have
the wrong length and must be replaced.

For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2007-0199, which is superseded, and requires
replacement of the affected fasteners by the ones that have the
correct length.
This [EASA] AD has been revised to correct and clarify the actions
required by paragraph (3).

This AD also adds new airplanes and removes one airplane from the
applicability of this AD. You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    328 Support Services GmbH has issued 328 Support Services Service
Bulletin SB-328-52-460, Revision 2, dated March 1, 2012 (for Model 328-
100 airplanes); and Dornier 328 Support Services Service Bulletin SB-
328J-52-213, Revision 1, dated August 17, 2011 (for Model 328-300
airplanes). The actions described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 35 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modify passenger doors [retained       38 work-hours x $85 per           $11,961         $15,191        $531,685
 actions from AD 2008-14-16,            hour = $3230.
 Amendment 39-15611 (73 FR 40955,
 July 17, 2008)].
Replace fasteners [new proposed        25 work-hours x 85 per                  0           2,125          74,375
 action].                               hour = 2,125.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition

that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2008-14-16, Amendment 39-15611 (73 FR 40955, July 17, 2008), and adding
the following new AD:

328 Support Services GmbH (Type Certificate Previously Held by
AvCraft Aerospace GmbH; Fairchild Dornier GmbH; Dornier Luftfahrt
GmbH): Docket No. FAA-2013-0702; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-181-
AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by October 11, 2013.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD supersedes AD 2008-14-16, Amendment 39-15611 (73 FR
40955, July 17, 2008).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to 328 Support Services GmbH (Type Certificate
previously held by AvCraft Aerospace GmbH; Fairchild Dornier GmbH;
Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH) airplanes, certificated in any category,
identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD.
    (1) Model 328-100 airplanes, serial numbers 3005 through 3101
inclusive, 3103, 3104, 3106, 3109, 3110, 3112, 3113, 3115, 3117, and
3119.
    (2) Model 328-300 airplanes, all serial numbers.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 11, Placards and
Markings; and Code 52, Doors.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports that certain fasteners, which
were installed as part of a modification, are the wrong length. We
are issuing this AD to prevent incidents of inadvertent opening and
possible detachment of a passenger door in-flight, resulting in
damage to airframe and systems and loss of control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Retained Installation and Modification for Airplanes Identified in
AD 2008-14-16, Amendment 39-15611 (73 FR 40955, July 17, 2008) with
Revised Service Information

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (f) of AD
2008-14-16, Amendment 39-15611 (73 FR 40955, July 17, 2008), with
revised service information.
    (1) For Model 328-100 airplanes, serial numbers 3005 through
3098 inclusive, 3100, 3106, 3109, 3110, 3112, 3113, 3115, 3117, and
3119; and Model 328-300 airplanes, having serial numbers 3102, 3105,
3108, 3111, 3114, 3116, 3118, and 3120 through 3224 inclusive:
Within 30 days after August 21, 2008, the effective date of AD 2008-
14-16, Amendment 39-15611 (73 FR 40955, July 17, 2008), install
warning placards on the inside of the passenger door and service
doors, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the
service information specified in paragraph (g)(1)(i) or (g)(1)(ii)
of this AD, as applicable.
    (i) Dornier [328 Support Services] Service Bulletin SB-328-11-
454, dated May 3, 2004 (for Model 328-100 airplanes).
    (ii) Dornier [328 Support Services] Service Bulletin SB-328J-11-
209, dated May 3, 2004 (for Model 328-300 airplanes).
    (2) For Model 328-100 airplanes, serial numbers 3005 through
3098 inclusive, 3100, 3106, 3109, 3110, 3112, 3113, 3115, 3117, and
3119; and Model 328-300 airplanes, having serial numbers 3102, 3105,
3108, 3111, 3114, 3116, 3118, and 3120 through 3224 inclusive:
Within 12 months after the effective date of August 21, 2008, the
effective date of AD 2008-14-16, Amendment 39-15611 (73 FR 0955,
July 17, 2008), modify the hinge supports and support struts of the
passenger doors, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of the service information specified in paragraphs (g)(2)(i) through
(g)(2)(iv) of this AD, as applicable. As of the effective date of
this AD only the service information specified in paragraphs
(g)(2)(ii) or (g)(2)(iv) of this AD, as applicable, may be used.
    (i) Dornier [328 Support Services] Service Bulletin SB-328-52-
460, dated February 4, 2005 (for Model 328-100 airplanes).
    (ii) Dornier 328 Support Services Service Bulletin SB-328-52-
460, Revision 2, dated March 1, 2012 (for Model 328-100 airplanes).
    (iii) Dornier [328J Support Services] Service Bulletin SB-328J-
52-213, dated February 4, 2005, (for Model 328-300 airplanes).
    (iv) Dornier 328J Support Services Service Bulletin SB-328J-52-
213, Revision 1, dated August 17, 2011 (for Model 328-300
airplanes).

(h) New Installation and Modification for Newly Added Airplanes

    For airplanes not identified in paragraph (g) of this AD, do the
actions required by paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD.
    (1) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, install
warning placards on the inside of the passenger door and service
doors, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Dornier
[328 Support Services] Service Bulletin SB-328-11-454, dated May 3,
2004 (for Model 328-100 airplanes); or Dornier [328 Support
Services] Service Bulletin SB-328J-11-209, dated May 3, 2004 (for
Model 328-300 airplanes); as applicable.
    (2) Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, modify
the hinge supports and support struts of the passenger doors, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Dornier 328
Support Services Service Bulletin SB-328-52-460, Revision 2, dated
March 1, 2012 (for Model 328-100 airplanes); or Dornier 328 Support
Services Service Bulletin SB-328J-52-213, Revision 1, dated August
17, 2011 (for Model 328-300 airplanes); as applicable.

(i) New Replacement of Fasteners for all Airplanes

    For airplanes on which 26 part number NAS6703U1 fasteners were
installed as specified in the service information in paragraphs
(g)(2)(i) and (g)(2)(iii) of this AD: Within 6 months after the
effective date of this AD, replace the 20 affected part number
NAS6703U1 fasteners with new fasteners having part number NAS6703U2,
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Dornier 328
Support Services Service Bulletin SB-328-52-460, Revision 2, dated
March 1, 2012 (for Model 328-100 airplanes); or Dornier 328 Support
Services Service Bulletin SB-328J-52-213, Revision 1, dated August
17, 2011 (for Model 328-300 airplanes); as applicable.

    Note 1 to paragraph (i) of this AD:  Dornier 328 Support
Services Service Bulletin SB-

328-52-460, Revision 2, dated March 1, 2012 and Dornier 328 Support
Services Service Bulletin SB-328J-52-213, Revision 1, dated August
17, 2011, identify 20 of 26 part number NAS6703U1 fasteners
requiring to be replaced due to incorrect length.

(j) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for certain actions required by
paragraph (g) and (h)(2) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using 328 Support Services
Service Bulletin SB-328-52-460, Revision 1, dated August 17, 2011.

(k) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Todd
Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(l) Related Information

    (1) Refer to European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Airworthiness Directive 2012-0183R1, dated September 28, 2012, for
related information, which can be found in the AD docket on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 16, 2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-20845 Filed 8-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 171 (Thursday, September 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52790-52794]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21002]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-72945; File No. SR-BATS-2014-038]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing of a Proposed Rule Change to Rules 11.9 and 21.1 of BATS
Exchange, Inc.

August 28, 2014
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on August 26, 2014, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BATS'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposal to amend Rule 11.9 to add certain
functionality to the Exchange's cash equities trading platform (``BATS
Equities''). Consistent with its practice of offering similar
functionality for the Exchange's equity options trading platform
(``BATS Options'') as it does for BATS Equities, the Exchange proposes
to amend Rule 21.1 to add similar functionality to BATS Options.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
Web site at http://www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange currently offers various forms of sliding which, in
all cases, result in the re-pricing of an order to, or ranking and/or
display of an order at, a price other than an order's limit price in
order to comply with applicable securities laws and/or Exchange rules.
Specifically, the Exchange currently offers price sliding to ensure
compliance with Regulation NMS and Regulation SHO for BATS Equities, as
well as price sliding for BATS Options to ensure compliance rules
analogous to Regulation NMS adopted by the Exchange and other options
exchanges. Price sliding currently offered by the Exchange re-prices
and displays an order upon entry and in certain cases again re-prices
and re-displays an order at a more aggressive price one time if and
when permissible (``single display-price sliding''), and optionally
continually re-prices an order (``multiple display-price sliding'')
based on changes in the national best bid (``NBB'') or national best
offer (``NBO'', and together with the NBB, the ``NBBO''). The Exchange
proposes to add another optional process, the Price Adjust process, as
described below. Price Adjust in all contexts for which it is being
proposed will have to be

elected by a User \3\ in order to be applied by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ As defined in BATS Rule 1.5(cc), a User is ``any Member or
Sponsored Participant who is authorized to obtain access to the
System pursuant to Rule 11.3.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In contrast to display-price sliding, which is based solely on
Protected Quotations \4\ at equities markets and options exchanges
other than the Exchange, Price Adjust would be based on Protected
Quotations at external markets and at the Exchange. If the Exchange has
a Protected Quotation that an incoming order to the Exchange locks or
crosses then such order executes against the resting order, or, if the
incoming order is a BATS Post Only Order or Partial Post Only at Limit
Order, such order would be executed in accordance with Rules 11.9(c)(6)
and (c)(7), respectively, or adjusted pursuant to the Price Adjust
process, as described in further detail below. Because the Exchange
will route orders to external markets with locking or crossing
quotations, the Exchange notes that the Price Adjust process would only
be applicable to non-routable orders, including BATS Only Orders, BATS
Post Only Orders and Partial Post Only at Limit Orders. In turn,
because BATS Only Orders will execute against locking or crossing
interest on the Exchange (including both Protected Quotations as well
as any non-displayed interest), the fact that Price Adjust would be
based on Protected Quotations at the Exchange is only relevant for BATS
Post Only Orders and Partial Post Only at Limit Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ As defined in BATS Rule 1.5(t), applicable to BATS Equities,
a ``Protected Quotation'' is ``a quotation that is a Protected Bid
or Protected Offer.'' In turn, the term ``Protected Bid'' or
``Protected Offer'' means ``a bid or offer in a stock that is (i)
displayed by an automated trading center; (ii) disseminated pursuant
to an effective national market system plan; and (iii) an automated
quotation that is the best bid or best offer of a national
securities exchange or association.'' As defined in BATS Rule 27.1,
applicable to BATS Options, a ``Protected Quotation'' is ``a
Protected Bid or Protected Offer.'' In turn, the term ``Protected
Bid'' or ``Protected Offer'' means ``a Bid or Offer in an options
series, respectively, that: (A) Is disseminated pursuant to the OPRA
Plan; and (B) Is the Best Bid or Best Offer, respectively, displayed
by an Eligible Exchange.'' An ``Eligible Exchange'' is defined in
Rule 27.1 as means ``a national securities exchange registered with
the SEC in accordance with Section 6(a) of the Exchange Act that:
(a) Is a Participant Exchange in OCC (as that term is defined in
Section VII of the OCC by-laws); (b) is a party to the OPRA Plan (as
that term is described in Section I of the OPRA Plan); and (c) if
the national securities exchange chooses not to become a party to
this Plan, is a participant in another plan approved by the
Commission providing for comparable Trade-Through and Locked and
Crossed Market protection.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

BATS Equities--Price Adjust
    With respect to price sliding offered to ensure compliance with
Regulation NMS (``display-price sliding''), under the Exchange's
current rules for BATS Equities, if, at the time of entry, a non-
routable order would cross a Protected Quotation displayed by another
trading center the Exchange re-prices and ranks such order at the
locking price, and displays such order at one minimum price variation
below the NBO for bids and above the NBB for offers. Similarly, in the
event a non-routable order that, at the time of entry, would lock a
Protected Quotation displayed by another trading center, the Exchange
ranks such order at the locking price and displays the order at one
minimum price variation below the NBO for bids and above the NBB for
offers.
    As proposed, under the Price Adjust process, an order eligible for
display by the Exchange that, at the time of entry, would create a
violation of Rule 610(d) of Regulation NMS by locking or crossing a
Protected Quotation of an external market or the Exchange will be
ranked and displayed by the System at one minimum price variation below
the current NBO (for bids) or to one minimum price variation above the
current NBB (for offers). Thus, in contrast to the display-price
sliding process, the Price Adjust process would both rank and display
an order at one minimum price variation below the current NBO or above
the current NBB (rather than ranking an order at the locking price).
Further, as noted above, the Price Adjust process would adjust the
price of a BATS Post Only Order or Partial Post Only at Limit Order
that would lock or cross an order displayed by the Exchange unless such
order is permitted to remove liquidity as described in Rules 11.9(c)(6)
and (c)(7), respectively, whereas the display-price sliding process
would cancel an order back to the User unless it removed liquidity on
entry.
    The Exchange also proposes to state that in the event the NBBO
changes \5\ such that an order subject to Price Adjust would not lock
or cross a Protected Quotation, the order will receive a new timestamp,
and will be displayed at the price that originally locked the NBO (for
bids) or NBB (for offers) on entry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Exchange notes that it recently filed a proposal
clarifying the methodology used by the Exchange to calculate the
NBBO, including the data feeds used to calculate the NBBO as well as
various types of feedback that update the Exchange's view of the
NBBO, such as feedback from receipt of Intermarket Sweep Orders with
a time-in-force of Day and feedback from the Exchange's routing
broker-dealer, BATS Trading, Inc. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 72685 (July 28, 2014), 79 FR 44889 (August 1, 2014) (SR-
BATS-2014-029).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As an example of the Price Adjust process, assume the Exchange has
a posted and displayed bid to buy 100 shares of a security priced at
$10.10 per share and a posted and displayed offer to sell 100 shares at
$10.13 per share. Assume the NBBO is $10.10 by $10.12. If the Exchange
receives a non-routable bid to buy 100 shares at $10.12 per share the
Exchange will rank and display the order to buy at $10.11 because
displaying the bid at $10.12 would lock an external market's Protected
Offer to sell for $10.12. If the NBO then moved to $10.13, the Exchange
would un-slide the bid to buy and rank and display it at its limit
price of $10.12.
    As an example of an order executed while subject to the Price
Adjust process before being un-slid by the Exchange, assume the
Exchange has a posted and displayed bid to buy 100 shares of a security
priced at $10.10 per share and a posted and displayed offer to sell 100
shares at $10.13 per share. Assume the NBBO is $10.10 by $10.12. If the
Exchange receives a non-routable bid to buy 100 shares at $10.12 per
share the Exchange will rank and display the order to buy at $10.11
because displaying the bid at $10.12 would lock an external market's
Protected Offer to sell for $10.12. Assume next that the Exchange
receives an offer to sell 100 shares at $10.11. The incoming order to
sell will execute at $10.11 against the resting bid to buy 100 shares
(originally priced at $10.12) that has been slid pursuant to the Price
Adjust process. Thus, the order executes at a full penny per share
better than if it were ranked at the locking price of $10.12 (buying
for $10.11 rather than $10.12 per share).
    Similarly, assume the Exchange has a posted and displayed bid to
buy 100 shares of a security priced at $10.10 per share and a posted
and displayed offer to sell 100 shares at $10.12 per share. Assume the
NBBO is also $10.10 by $10.12. If the Exchange receives a BATS Post
Only bid to buy 100 shares at $10.12 per share the Exchange will rank
and display the order to buy at $10.11 because displaying the bid at
$10.12 would lock the Exchange's Protected Offer to sell for $10.12 and
the order would not remove liquidity pursuant to Rule 11.9(c)(6). If
the NBO, including the Exchange's best offer, then moved to $10.13, the
Exchange would un-slide the bid to buy and rank and display it at its
limit price of $10.12.
    The Exchange also proposes to state that all orders that are re-
ranked and re-displayed pursuant to Price Adjust will retain their
priority as compared to other orders subject to Price Adjust based upon
the time such orders were initially received by the Exchange. Further,
as proposed, following the

initial ranking and display of an order subject to Price Adjust, an
order will only be re-ranked and re-displayed to the extent it achieves
a more aggressive price.
    In order to offer multiple price sliding to Exchange Users that
select Price Adjust, the Exchange proposes to make clear that the
ranked and displayed prices of an order subject to Price Adjust may be
adjusted once or multiple times depending upon the instructions of a
User and changes to the prevailing NBBO. As is true for display-price
sliding, multiple price sliding pursuant to Price Adjust would be
optional and would have to be explicitly selected by a User before it
will be applied. Orders subject to multiple price sliding for Price
Adjust will be permitted to move all the way back to their most
aggressive price, whereas orders subject to Price Adjust may not be
adjusted to their most aggressive price, depending upon market
conditions and the limit price of the order upon entry.
    As an example of multiple price sliding for Price Adjust assume the
Exchange has a posted and displayed bid to buy 100 shares of a security
priced at $10.10 per share and a posted and displayed offer to sell 100
shares at $10.14 per share. Assume the NBBO is $10.10 by $10.12. If the
Exchange receives a non-routable bid to buy 100 shares at $10.13 per
share, the Exchange would rank and display the order to buy at $10.11
because displaying the bid at $10.13 would cross an external market's
Protected Offer to sell for $10.12. If the NBO then moved to $10.13,
the Exchange would un-slide the bid to buy and rank and display it at
$10.12. Under the proposed single Price Adjust functionality, the
Exchange would not further adjust the ranked or displayed price
following this un-slide. However, under multiple price sliding for
Price Adjust if the NBO then moved to $10.14, the Exchange would un-
slide the bid to buy and rank and display it at its full limit price of
$10.13.
    The Exchange currently offers display-price sliding functionality
to avoid locking or crossing other markets' Protected Quotations, but
does not price slide to avoid executions on the Exchange's order book
(``BATS Book''). Specifically, when the Exchange receives an incoming
order that could execute against resting displayed liquidity but an
execution does not occur because such incoming order is designated as
an order that will not remove liquidity (i.e., a BATS Post Only
Order),\6\ then the Exchange will cancel the incoming order. As noted
above, the Exchange proposes to make clear in the description of Price
Adjust that any display-eligible BATS Post Only Order that locks or
crosses a Protected Quotation displayed by the Exchange upon entry will
be executed as set forth in Rule 11.9(c)(6) or adjusted pursuant to the
Price Adjust process. Similarly, the Exchange proposes to make clear
that any display-eligible Partial Post Only at Limit Order that locks
or crosses a Protected Quotation displayed by the Exchange upon entry
will be executed as set forth in Rule 11.9(c)(7) or adjusted pursuant
to the Price Adjust process. The Exchange reiterates that in contrast
to the proposed operation of Price Adjust, the existing display-price
sliding process would instead cancel BATS Post Only orders and BATS
Partial Post Only at Limit orders that would lock or cross a Protected
Quotation displayed by the Exchange to the extent such orders are not
executed on entry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Exchange again notes that BATS Post Only Orders are
permitted to remove liquidity from the BATS Book if the value of
price improvement associated with such execution equals or exceeds
the sum of fees charged for such execution and the value of any
rebate that would be provided if the order posted to the BATS Book
and subsequently provided liquidity. See Rule 11.9(c)(6). Similarly,
Partial Post Only at Limit Orders are permitted to remove price
improving liquidity as well as a User-selected percentage of the
remaining order at the limit price if, following such removal, the
order can post at its limit price. See Rule 11.9(c)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange currently applies display-price sliding to Non-
Displayed Orders that cross Protected Quotations of external markets.
The Exchange proposes language that makes clear that this functionality
will apply to all orders for which a User has selected either display-
price sliding or Price Adjust. The proposed rule states that Non-
Displayed Orders that are subject to display-price sliding or Price
Adjust are ranked at the locking price on entry. The proposed
description also makes clear that price sliding for Non-Displayed
Orders is functionally equivalent to the handling of displayable orders
except that such orders will not have a displayed price and will not be
re-priced again unless such orders cross a Protected Quotation of an
external market (i.e., such orders are not un-slid). Other than
updating the language of the rule to reflect that Non-Displayed Orders
for which a User has selected Price Adjust will be handled in the same
way as orders subject to display-price sliding, the Exchange is not
proposing to change its handling of Non-Displayed Orders.
    As an example of the Exchange's handling of Non-Displayed Orders in
the context of Price Adjust, assume the Exchange has a posted and
displayed bid to buy 100 shares of a security priced at $10.10 per
share and a posted and displayed offer to sell 100 shares at $10.13 per
share. Assume the NBBO is $10.10 by $10.11. If the Exchange receives a
Non-Displayed Order bid to buy 100 shares at $10.12 per share, the
Exchange would re-price the order to a $10.11 bid to buy to avoid
potentially trading through the $10.11 offer displayed as the NBO
(i.e., to ensure the Exchange will not allow the bid to trade at $10.12
per share). In the event the NBBO moved to $10.09 by $10.10, the
Exchange would re-price the Non-Displayed bid to buy 100 shares to
$10.10 per share. If the NBBO then moved to $10.10 by $10.11, the Non-
Displayed bid would not be re-priced to $10.11, but would remain on the
Exchange's order book at $10.10. This proposed handling is identical to
handling of a Non-Displayed Order for which a User has selected
display-price sliding.
    The Exchange also proposes that in the event the NBBO changes such
that display eligible orders subject to display-price sliding and Price
Adjust would not lock or cross a Protected Quotation and are eligible
to be displayed at a more aggressive price, the System will first
display all orders subject to display-price sliding at their ranked
price followed by orders subject to Price Adjust, which will be re-
ranked and re-displayed as set forth above. The Exchange believes it is
reasonable to un-slide orders subject to display-price sliding before
it un-slides orders subject to Price Adjust because Price Adjust is a
less aggressive form of price sliding than display-price sliding, in
that an order submitted by a User that elects Price Adjust will be
displayed and ranked at the same price rather than ranked at the
locking price and displayed at a less aggressive price.
    The Exchange also proposes to make clear that if a User elects to
apply Price Adjust to an order submitted to BATS Equities, price
sliding will apply short sale price sliding in connection with the
handling of the order by the Exchange. The Exchange does not propose to
modify its short sale price sliding functionality.
BATS Options--Price Adjust
    In order to maintain consistency between analogous processes
offered by BATS Equities and BATS Options, the Exchange proposes to
modify the rules of BATS Options to conform to the changes described
above related to Price Adjust.
    BATS Options currently offers display-price sliding (including
multiple display-price sliding) offered

to ensure compliance with locked and crossed market rules relevant to
participation on BATS Options. The proposed Price Adjust functionality
for BATS Options is similar to the proposed functionality for BATS
Equities, with the exception of language related to non-displayed
orders. BATS Options does not have non-displayed orders, and thus, has
omitted language regarding Price Adjust functionality applicable to
non-displayed orders.
    As drafted, Rules 21.1(i) and 21.1(j) are identical to the
description of display-price sliding set forth in proposed Rule 11.9
and described above with the exception of minor references necessary
due to the difference between rules applicable to BATS Equities and
BATS Options and the omission of certain rule text specific to non-
displayed orders, which are applicable to BATS Equities only. Further,
the examples set forth above are equally applicable to the operation of
Price Adjust on BATS Options as they are to the operation of Price
Adjust on BATS Equities.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule changes are consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'')
\7\ and further the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \8\
because they are designed to promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market system, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest. The proposed rule change also is designed to support the
principles of Section 11A(a)(1) \9\ of the Act in that it seeks to
assure fair competition among brokers and dealers and among exchange
markets. The Exchange believes that the proposed changes to offer Price
Adjust are consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ as well as
Rule 610 of Regulation NMS \11\ and Rule 201 of Regulation SHO.\12\ The
Exchange is not modifying the overall functionality of price sliding,
which, to avoid locking or crossing quotations of other market centers
or to comply with applicable short sale restrictions, displays orders
at permissible prices while retaining a price at which the User is
willing to buy or sell, in the event display at such price or an
execution at such price becomes possible. Instead, the Exchange is
making changes to adopt an optional form of price sliding, Price
Adjust, which will rank orders at their displayed price rather than the
locking price, as described above. Thus, while subject to Price Adjust
sliding, an order is ranked at a less aggressive price, which may be
preferable to certain Users that wish to provide liquidity but do not
wish to cross the spread (i.e., if buying, do not wish to trade at the
NBO or if selling, do not wish to trade at the NBB). The Exchange
believes it is reasonable to un-slide display-price sliding orders
before it un-slides Price Adjust orders because Price Adjust is a less
aggressive form of price sliding than display-price sliding, in that an
order submitted by a User would be displayed and ranked at the same
price rather than ranked at the locking price and displayed at a less
aggressive price. Thus, because orders subject to display-price sliding
are ranked at and subject to execution at higher prices when buying and
lower prices when selling, the Exchange believes that such orders
should be re-displayed before orders subject to Price Adjust orders in
response to changes to the NBBO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1).
    \10\ Id.
    \11\ 17 CFR 242.610.
    \12\ 17 CFR 242.201.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 610(d) requires exchanges to establish, maintain, and enforce
rules that require members reasonably to avoid ``[d]isplaying
quotations that lock or cross any protected quotation in an NMS
stock.'' \13\ Such rules must be ``reasonably designed to assure the
reconciliation of locked or crossed quotations in an NMS stock,'' and
must ``prohibit . . . members from engaging in a pattern or practice of
displaying quotations that lock or cross any quotation in an NMS
stock.'' \14\ Thus, the Price Adjust process proposed by the Exchange,
including the functionality proposed for BATS Options, will assist
Users by displaying orders at permissible prices. Similarly, Rule 201
of Regulation SHO \15\ requires trading centers to establish, maintain,
and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to
prevent the execution or display of a short sale order at a price at or
below the current NBB under certain circumstances. The Exchange's short
sale price sliding will continue to operate the same for Users of Price
Adjust as it does for Users that select the display-price sliding
process offered by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 242.610(d).
    \14\ Id.
    \15\ 17 CFR 242.201.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted above, in contrast to display-price sliding, which is
based solely on Protected Quotations at equities markets and options
exchanges other than the Exchange, the proposed Price Adjust process
would be based on Protected Quotations at external markets and at the
Exchange. Thus, if the Exchange has a Protected Quotation that an
incoming order to the Exchange locks or crosses then such order
executes against the resting order, or, if the incoming order is a BATS
Post Only Order or Partial Post Only at Limit Order, such order would
be executed in accordance with Rules 11.9(c)(6) and (c)(7),
respectively, or adjusted pursuant to the Price Adjust process. The
Exchange believes that it is reasonable and consistent with the Act to
apply the Price Adjust process to orders on entry that cannot executed
or displayed at their limit price because this will contribute to
additional displayed liquidity on the Exchange than if such orders were
cancelled back to the User. Therefore, the Exchange believes the
proposal to apply the Price Adjust process to orders that cannot be
displayed because they would lock or cross displayed contra-side
interest on the Exchange (and not just external markets) will promote
just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to, and
perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market
system. The Exchange also reiterates that the proposed Price Adjust
process will enable the System to avoid displaying a locking or
crossing quotation in order to ensure compliance with Rule 610(d) of
Regulation NMS.
    The Exchange notes that similar functionality was recently proposed
by the Exchange's affiliate, EDGX Exchange, Inc. and that the proposed
rules are based on the Price Adjust functionality set forth in such
proposal.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72676 (July 25,
2014), 79 FR 44520 (July 31, 2014) (SR-EDGX-2014-18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed
rule change is being proposed as an additional option for Users that
wish to utilize Exchange price sliding functionality and that the
functionality is consistent with that offered by the Exchange today as
well as affiliates and

competitors of the Exchange. Thus, the Exchange believes this proposed
rule change is necessary to permit fair competition among national
securities exchanges.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will: (a) By order approve
or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BATS-2014-038 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2014-038. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090 on official business days between the hours
of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
BATS-2014-038, and should be submitted on or before September 25, 2014.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-21002 Filed 9-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 11, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43911-43913]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16831]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0275; Airspace Docket No. 20-AAL-39]
RIN 2120-AA66

Modification of Class E Airspace; Gulkana, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action modifies the Class E airspace, designated as a
surface area at Gulkana Airport, Gulkana, AK. This action also modifies
the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface.
The NPRM for this action proposed a modification to the Class E
airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface, however,
the proposed change has been removed from the Final Rule. Additionally,
this action removes the Gulkana VORTAC and the Glenallen NDB from the
Class E2 text header and airspace description. Further, this action
removes the Gulkana VOR/DME from the Class E5 text header and airspace
description. Lastly, this action implements administrative updates to
the Class E2 and E5 text headers and the Class E2 airspace description.
The airspace is designed to support instrument flight rules (IFR)
operations at the airport.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, December 2, 2021. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and
publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov//air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you
can contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11E at NARA, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Van Der Wal, Federal Aviation
Administration, Western Service Center, Operations Support Group, 2200
S 216th Street Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that

section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the
use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it modifies the Class E airspace at Gulkana Airport,
Gulkana, AK, to ensure the safety and management of IFR operations at
the airport.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (86 FR 22366; April 28, 2021) for Docket No. FAA-2021-0275 to
modify the Class E airspace at Gulkana Airport, Gulkana, AK. Interested
parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments
were received.
    After the publication of the NRPM, the FAA identified a change to
the RNAV (GPS) RWY 15 approach, affecting the Class E airspace
extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface. As a result, the
FAA is removing the proposed change to this Class E airspace area from
the Final Rule. The airspace will remain within a 76-mile radius of
Gulkana Airport.
    Class E2 and Class E5 airspace designations are published in
paragraphs 6002 and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order 7400.11E, dated
July 21, 2020, and effective September 15, 2020, which is incorporated
by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designation listed in
this document will be published subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020, and effective September 15,
2020. FAA Order 7400.11E is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11E lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 71 modifies the Class E airspace,
designated as a surface area, at Gulkana Airport, Gulkana, AK. The
areas extending north and south of the 4-mile radius are removed, the
areas are no longer required to contain IFR aircraft descending below
1,000 feet above the surface. This action also removes the following
verbiage from this airspace area ``to and including 4,100 feet MSL''.
The ceiling of this airspace area is now aligned to the floor of the
overlying controlled airspace, which begins at 700 feet above the
surface.
    This action also modifies the Class E airspace extending upward
from 700 feet above the surface. This airspace is designed to contain
IFR departures to 1,200 feet above the surface and IFR arrivals
descending below 1,500 feet above the surface. To properly contain IFR
aircraft arriving and departing from the airport, the circular radius
of the airspace is reduced from 6.5 miles to 5 miles. The area
extending south of the 5-mile radius is enlarged to contain aircraft
holding for the RNAV (GPS) RWY 33R approach. The area extending north
of the 5-mile radius is also modified slightly; this modification
accounts for using the airport as the sole reference for the airspace's
description.
    Additionally, this action removes the Gulkana VORTAC and the
Glenallen NDB from the Class E2 text header and airspace description.
This action also removes the Gulkana VOR/DME from the Class E5 text
header and airspace description. The navigational aids (NAVAID) are not
needed to define the airspace and removal of the NAVAIDs simplifies the
airspaces' descriptions.
    Lastly, the action implements administrative updates to the
airspaces' text headers and airspace descriptions. On the second line
of the Class E5 text header, the redundant use of Gulkana has been
removed. On the third line of the Class E2 and E5 text headers, the
geographic coordinates are updated to ``lat. 62[deg]09'16'' N, long.
145[deg]27'19'' W'' In the last sentence of the Class E2 airspace
description, the term ``Airport/Facility Directory'' is updated to
``Chart Supplement.''
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial, and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant the preparation of an
environmental assessment.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11E,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020, and
effective September 15, 2020, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

AAL AK E2 Gulkana, AK [Amended]

Gulkana Airport, AK
    (Lat. 62[deg]09'16'' N, long. 145[deg]27'19'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within a 4-mile
radius of the airport. This Class E airspace area is effective
during specific dates and times established in advance by Notice to
Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously
published in the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AAL AK E5 Gulkana, AK [Amended]

Gulkana Airport, AK
    (Lat. 62[deg]09'16'' N, long. 145[deg]27'19'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 5-mile radius of the airport, and within 5 miles each side
of the 169[deg] bearing from the airport, extending from the 5-mile
radius to 24 miles south of the airport, and within 4 miles each
side of the 351[deg] bearing from the airport, extending from the 5-
mile radius to 12.5 miles north of the airport; and that airspace
extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface within a 67-mile
radius of the airport.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on August 2, 2021.
B.G. Chew,
Acting Group Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2021-16831 Filed 8-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 14 (Wednesday, January 22, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3507-3508]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01214]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 98

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0028; FRL-9905-71-OAR]
RIN 2060-AR52

2013 Revisions to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule and Final
Confidentiality Determinations for New or Substantially Revised Data
Elements

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final
rule in the Federal Register on November 29, 2013. The final rule
amended the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule to implement technical
corrections, clarifying revisions, and other amendments to improve the
quality and consistency of the data collected by the EPA, including
amendments to the Reporting Rule's table of global warming potentials
to revise the values for certain greenhouse gases. An error in the
regulatory text is identified and corrected in this action.

DATES: This final rule is effective on January 22, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carole Cook, Climate Change Division,
Office of Atmospheric Programs (MC-6207J), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA published a final rule document on
November 29, 2013 (78 FR 71904) that amended the Greenhouse Gas
Reporting Rule to implement technical corrections, clarifying
revisions, and other amendments. One of the instruction headings was
printed incorrectly in the Federal Register.

Therefore, this instruction heading is corrected in this notice.

Correction

    In the final rule published in the Federal Register on November 29,
2013 (78 FR 71904), on page 71977, third column, instruction 102 is
corrected to read: ``102. Table NN-2 to subpart NN is revised to read
as follows:''.

List of Subjects 40 CFR Part 98

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Greenhouse gases, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: January 14, 2014.
Janet G. McCabe,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2014-01214 Filed 1-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 39 (Tuesday, March 2, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12145-12146]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04100]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 282

[EPA-R03-UST-2020-0291, FRL 10018-07-Region 3]

Virginia: Final Approval of State Underground Storage Tank
Program Revisions, Codification, and Incorporation by Reference

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1965, as amended
(commonly known as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)),
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the Commonwealth of Virginia's Underground Storage Tank
(UST) program submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia (Virginia or
State). This action is based on EPA's determination that these
revisions satisfy all requirements needed for program approval. This
action also proposes to codify EPA's approval of Virginia's state
program and to incorporate by reference those provisions of Virginia's
regulations and statutes that we have determined meet the requirements
for approval. The provisions will be subject to EPA's inspection and
enforcement authorities under sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA Subtitle I
and other applicable statutory and regulatory provisions. In the
``Rules and Regulations'' section of this issue of the Federal
Register, EPA is approving this action by a direct final rule. If no
significant negative comment is received, EPA will not take further
action on this proposed rulemaking, and the direct final rule will be
effective 60 days from the date of publication in this

Federal Register. If you want to comment on EPA's proposed approval of
Virginia's revisions to its state UST program, you must do so at this
time.

DATES: Send written comments by April 1, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit any comments, identified by EPA-R03-UST-2020-0291, by
one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-UST-
2020-0291. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be available online at
https://www.regulations.gov including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov, or email. The federal website https://www.regulations.gov, is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA
will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide
it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through https://www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties,
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. EPA encourages electronic submittals, but if you are unable to
submit electronically, please reach out to the EPA contact person
listed in the notice for assistance. If you need assistance in a
language other than English, or you are a person with disabilities who
needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please reach out to
the EPA contact person by email or phone.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas UyBarreta,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>RCRA Programs Branch; Land, Chemicals, and
Redevelopment Division; EPA Region 3, 1650 Arch Street (Mailcode
3LD30), Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has explained the reasons for this
action in the preamble to the direct final rule. For additional
information, see the direct final rule published in the ``Rules and
Regulations'' section of this issue of the Federal Register.

    Authority: This rule is issued under the authority of section
9004 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1965, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
6991c.

Diana Esher,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 3.
[FR Doc. 2021-04100 Filed 3-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 189 (Monday, October 2, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 45721]
[FR Doc No: C1-2017-20590]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 73

[Docket No. FAA-2016-7055; Airspace Docket No. 15-AWP-11]

Establishment of Restricted Area R-2306F; Yuma Proving Ground, AZ

Correction

    In Rule document 2017-20590, appearing on pages 44721-44723 in the
issue of Tuesday, September 26, 2017, make the following correction:

Sec.  73.23   [Corrected]

    1. On page 44723, column one, line 7, the longitude coordinate
``114[deg]26'3'' W.'' should read ``114[deg]26'33'' W.''
    2. On page 44723, column one, line 11, the longitude coordinate
``114[deg]26'9'' W.'' should read ``114[deg]26'29'' W.''

[FR Doc. C1-2017-20590 Filed 9-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1301-00-D


[Federal Register: December 20, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 243)]
[Notices]
[Page 79365-79367]
[DOCID:fr20de10-930]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

December 9, 2010.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1106-009; ER08-1255-003; ER08-1255-004; ER10-
566-001; ER10-566-002.
    Applicants: ArcLight Energy Marketing, LLC, Oak Creek Wind Power,
LLC, Coso Geothermal Power Holdings, LLC.
    Description: Supplement to Updated Market Power Analysis for
Southwest Region of Coso Geothermal Power Holdings, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 12/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101208-5126.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-394-028.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Report of Midwest Independent Transmission System
Operator, Inc.
    Filed Date: 12/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101208-5203.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-394-029.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Report of Midwest Independent System Transmission
Operator, Inc.
    Filed Date: 12/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101208-5208.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2728-001.
    Applicants: Green Valley Hydro, LLC.
    Description: Green Valley Hydro, LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Green Valley Hydro Compliance Filing to be effective 12/8/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101208-5144.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2729-001.
    Applicants: Buchanan Generation, LLC.
    Description: Buchanan Generation, LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Buchanan Generation Compliance Filing to be effective 12/8/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101208-5143.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2808-001.
    Applicants: Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Energy Services, LLC.
    Description: Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Energy Services, LLC
submits tariff filing per 35: FMES Revisions to Baseline FERC Electric
MBR Volume No. 1 to be effective 9/21/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/09/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101209-5060.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, December 30, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2029-001.
    Applicants: Cedar Creek II, LLC.
    Description: Cedar Creek II, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.17(b): MBR Application of Cedar Creek II, LLC to be effective 12/16/
2010.
    Filed Date: 12/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101208-5169.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2088-001.
    Applicants: Border Energy Electric Services, Inc.
    Description: Border Energy Electric Services, Inc. submits tariff
filing per 35.17(b): Amendment to Filing of Border Energy Electric
Services, Inc. to be effective 1/11/2011.
    Filed Date: 12/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101208-5132.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2096-001.
    Applicants: The Connecticut Light and Power Company.
    Description: The Connecticut Light and Power Company submits a
tariff filing per 35.17(b): Amended GenConn Localized Costs
Responsibility Agreement to be effective 1/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 12/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101208-5112.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2099-001.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of New Hampshire.
    Description: Public Service Company of New Hampshire submits tariff
filing per 35.17(b): Amended Localized Costs Responsibility Agreement
to be effective 1/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 12/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101208-5127.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2100-001.
    Applicants: Western Massachusetts Electric Company.
    Description: Western Massachusetts Electric Company submits tariff
filing per 35.17(b): Amended Localized Costs Responsibility Agreement
to be effective 1/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 12/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101208-5155.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2316-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company submits tariff
filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): LGIA Blythe Solar Power Project SA 97 to
be effective 12/9/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101208-5157.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2317-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii): Formula Update--OG&E, NPPD, ITC, SPS, Westar to be
effective 1/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 12/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101208-5158.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2318-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corporation
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 2010-12-08 CAISO's Service
Agreement 1774, Non-Conforming LGIA to be effective 12/8/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101208-5175.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2319-000.
    Applicants: Idaho Power Company.
    Description: Idaho Power Company SA 174 Notice of Termination
Letter.
    Filed Date: 12/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101208-5202.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2320-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: New York Independent System Operator, Inc. submits
tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Service Agreement No. 1152 Niagara
Mohawk and Lyonsdale to be effective 2/7/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/09/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101209-5037.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, December 30, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2321-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company submits tariff
filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Revised Service Agreement for Wholesale
Distribution Service SA No. 2 to be effective 2/8/2011.
    Filed Date: 12/09/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101209-5045.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, December 30, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2322-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company submits tariff
filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): LGIA Coram Brodie Wind Project SA 95 to be
effective 12/10/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/09/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101209-5046.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, December 30, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2323-000.
    Applicants: Athens Energy, LLC.
    Description: Athens Energy, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.1:
FERC Electric Tariff to be effective 12/9/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/09/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101209-5047.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, December 30, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2324-000.
    Applicants: Kennebec River Energy, LLC.
    Description: Kennebec River Energy, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.1: FERC Electric Tariff to be effective 12/9/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/09/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101209-5048.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, December 30, 2010.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on

or before the comment deadline need not be served on persons other than
the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-31842 Filed 12-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P