[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 100 (Thursday, May 23, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30912-30913]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12297]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IC13-15-000]

Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-582); Comment
Request; Extension

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of information collection and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (Commission or FERC) is soliciting public comment on the
currently approved information collection, FERC-582 (Electric Fees,
Annual Charges, Waivers, and Exemptions).

DATES: Comments on the collection of information are due July 22, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments (identified by Docket No. IC13-15-
000) by either of the following methods:
     eFiling at Commission's Web site: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp.
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Instructions: All submissions must be formatted and filed in
accordance with submission guidelines at: http://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide.asp. For user assistance contact FERC Online Support
by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by phone at:<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll-free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> for TTY.
    Docket: Users interested in receiving automatic notification of
activity in this docket or in viewing/downloading comments and
issuances in this docket may do so at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/docs-filing.asp.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Ellen Brown may be reached by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, and fax at (202)
273-0873.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Electric Fees, Annual Charges, Waivers, and Exemptions.
    OMB Control No.: 1902-0132.
    Type of Request: Three-year extension of the FERC-582 information
collection requirements with no changes to the current reporting
requirements.
    Abstract: The information required by FERC-582 is contained within
18 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 381 \1\ and part 382.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Title 18 CFR, Sections 381.105, 381.106, 381.108, 381.302,
and 381.305.
    \2\ Title 18 CFR, Sections 382.102, 382.103, 382.105, 382.106,
and 382.201.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission uses the FERC-582 to implement the statutory
provisions of the Independent Offices Appropriation Act of 1952 (IOAA)
\3\ which authorizes the Commission to establish fees for its services.
In addition, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986 (OBRA) \4\
authorizes the Commission to assess and collect fees and annual charges
in any fiscal year in amounts equal to all the costs incurred by the
Commission in that fiscal year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 31 U.S.C. 9701.
    \4\ 42 U.S.C. 7178.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To comply with the FERC-582 respondents submit to the Commission
the sum of the megawatt-hours (MWh) of all unbundled transmission
(including MWh delivered in wheeling transactions and MWh delivered in
exchange transactions) and the megawatt-hours of all bundled wholesale
power sales (to the extent the bundled wholesale power sales were not
separately reported as unbundled transmission). The data collected
within the FERC-582 is drawn directly from the FERC Form 1 transmission
data. The Commission sums the costs of its electric regulatory program
and subtracts all electric regulatory program filing fee collections to
determine the total collectible electric regulatory program costs.
Then, the Commission uses the data submitted under FERC-582 to
determine the total megawatt-hours of transmission of electric energy
in interstate commerce.
    Respondents (e.g. public utilities, power marketers) subject to
these annual charges must submit FERC-582 data to the Commission by
April 30 of each year.\5\ The Commission issues bills for annual
charges to respondents. Then, respondents must pay the charges within
45 days of the Commission's issuance of the bill.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 18 CFR 382.201.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Respondents file requests for waivers and exemptions of fees and
charges \6\ based on need. The Commission's staff uses the filer's
financial information to evaluate the request for a waiver or exemption
of the obligation to pay a fee or an annual charge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 18 CFR parts 381 and 382.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimate of Annual Burden: \7\ The Commission estimates the total
Public Reporting Burden for this information collection as:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Commission defines burden as the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain,
retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal
agency. For further explanation of what is included in the
information collection burden, reference 5 CFR 1320.3.

                                            FERC-582--Electric Fees; Annual Charges; Waivers; and Exemptions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of                       Average burden
                                                                        Number of      responses per   Total number of     hours per     Estimated total
                                                                       respondents       respondent       responses         response      annual burden
                                                                                (A)              (B)    (A) x (B) = (C)            (D)                (C) x (D)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FERC-582 \8\.......................................................             114                1              114                1              114
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The total estimated annual cost burden to respondents is $7,980
[114 hours * $70/hour \9\ = $7,980].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Includes requirements of 18 CFR 381.105 (methods of
payment), 381.106 (waiver), 381.108 (exemption), 381.302
(declaratory order), 381.303 (review of DOE remedial order), 381.304
(DOE denial of adjustment, and 381.305 (OGC interpretation).
    \9\ FY2013 Estimated Average Hourly Cost per FERC FTE, including
salary plus benefits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comments: Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden and
cost of the collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information collection; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.

    Dated: May 17, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-12297 Filed 5-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 143 (Friday, July 24, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 44921]
[FR Doc No: 2020-16108]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4508-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]

Montana; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Montana (FEMA-4508-DR), dated March 31, 2020, and
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued July 6, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Montana is hereby amended to include Individual
Assistance limited to the Crisis Counseling Program for those areas
determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a
major disaster by the President in his declaration of March 31, 2020.
    Individual Assistance limited to the Crisis Counseling Program
for all areas in the State of Montana (already designated for
emergency protective measures [Category B] not authorized under
other Federal statutes, including direct Federal assistance).
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-16108 Filed 7-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39451-39453]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16854]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-64771; File No. SR-CHX-2011-14]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Concerning the CHX Connect Service

June 29, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on June 24, 2011, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the CHX. CHX has filed this
proposal pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \3\ which is
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    CHX proposes to add Article 4, Rule 2 (CHX Connect) to include an
explicit description of the Exchange's CHX Connect order routing
service. The text of this proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Web site at (http://www.chx.com) and in the Commission's
Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the CHX included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule changes and
discussed any comments it received regarding the proposal. The text of
these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV
below. The CHX has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and
C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    New Article 4, Rule 2 describes the operation of the CHX Connect
routing network. CHX Connect is an electronic communications service
owned and operated by the Exchange which allows Participants to
transmit orders and related transaction information directly to any
destination designated by the order sending Participant (such as an
over-the-counter market maker or order-routing vendor) connected to the
service without being submitted to the Exchange's trading facilities.
The CHX Connect communications service was described in a rule filing
made with the Commission in 2006, but which did not update the
Exchange's rules.\4\ In order to remove any potential ambiguity about
the nature of the Exchange's technology and communications offerings,
we are now proposing to add language to our rules describing CHX
Connect. The CHX Connect service has not changed in any material
respect since the 2006 filing. Use of the CHX Connect service by any
Exchange Participant is entirely optional and is not required to direct
orders to our Matching System for execution or display.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Exchange Act Release No. 54846 (Nov. 30, 2006), 71 FR 71003
(Dec. 7, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that certain order senders may have an
interest in the CHX Connect service in order to efficiently route
orders which cannot be accepted into the Matching System directly. For
example, an order sender may have received a market order to buy a NMS
security normally traded in the CHX Matching System.\5\ Since the
Matching System does not accept market orders, the order sender cannot
route that order to our trading facilities. An order sender can use the
CHX

Connect service to transmit that order to a destination which is also
connected to the service and which accepts and executes market orders,
such as an over-the-counter market maker. CHX Connect can be used to
transmit order information to other destinations in any security
approved by the Exchange for use within the system, including, but not
limited to, securities approved for trading within the Matching System.
The Exchange plays no role in determining where the order is sent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Similar examples would be All or None orders or orders in
securities not traded by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Participants may also elect to use CHX Connect to transmit orders
in an electronic format to the Exchange's Matching System, to
Institutional Brokers registered with the Exchange pursuant to Article
17 of our rules, and to other destinations which are connected to the
CHX's network. The Matching System will only accept orders in
securities listed on the Exchange or eligible for Unlisted Trading
Privileges. The Exchange believes that certain Participants may be
interested in using CHX Connect to send orders to our facilities as an
alternative to private order routing systems or vendors, which perform
the same function. Participants may designate where an order is to be
directed on a security-by-security or order-by-order basis.
Instructions received on an order-by-order basis shall supersede
previously-received instructions on a security-by-security basis. Use
of the CHX Connect service is subject to the approval of the Exchange.
The Exchange evaluates all potential users on an equal and non-
discriminatory basis. The criteria by which potential users of the
service are evaluated relate solely to preserving the security and
integrity of the Exchange's systems, and to ensuring the proper
formatting of messages sent via CHX Connect in generally accepted
industry protocols, such as Financial Information eXchange (FIX)
Protocol. The fees and charges for a subscription to the CHX Connect
Service are set forth in the Exchange's published Schedule of Fees and
Assessments, and apply equally to all users of the system.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Exchange charges only those Participants which receive
(and not those which solely transmit) orders through the CHX Connect
service. The current fee for receiving orders via CHX Connect is
$5,000 per month. See, CHX Schedule of Fees and Assessments, Section
M.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This service is a facility of the Exchange. As a result, the
Exchange would submit fee changes, and any applicable changes to its
rules, to the Commission as required by Exchange Act Rule 19b-4 in
connection with the CHX Connect service.
    The Exchange would provide these routing services in compliance
with its rules and with the provisions of the Exchange Act and the
rules thereunder, including, but not limited to, the requirements of
Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act that the rules of a national
securities exchange provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among its members and issuers and other
persons using its facilities, and not be designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(1) of the Act in particular, in that it allows the
Exchange to be organized and have the capacity to be able to carry out
the purposes of the Act and to comply, and (subject to any rule or
order of the Commission pursuant to section 17(d) or 19(g)(2) of the
Act) to enforce compliance by its members and persons associated with
such members, with the provisions of the Act, the rules and regulations
thereunder, and the rules of the exchange. As discussed herein, CHX
Connect is a communications service offered by the Exchange to its
Participants to either send orders to the Matching System or to another
destination of its choosing. The CHX Connect communications service was
described in a rule filing made with the Commission in 2006, but which
did not update the Exchange's rules.\7\ In order to remove any
potential ambiguity about the nature of the Exchange's technology and
communications offerings, we are now proposing to add language to our
rules describing CHX Connect. The CHX Connect service has not changed
in any material respect since the 2006 filing. By adding a description
of the nature of the CHX Connect service to the Exchange's rules, this
proposal advances the purposes of the Exchange Act by providing added
clarity about the nature and extent of certain services offered by the
Exchange to its Participants, and thereby contributing to the ability
of our members in complying with the requirements related to those
services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Exchange Act Release No. 54846 (Nov. 30, 2006), 71 FR 71003
(Dec. 7, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As noted above, the Exchange
believes that its CHX Connect service will compete with the existing
order routing networks operated by broker-dealers or other service
providers. By providing Participants a means of effectively directing
orders which cannot be accepted into the Matching System to a
destination which can handle such orders, the Exchange is attempting to
provide ready solutions to potential order senders, with the ultimate
goal of maximizing order flow to the Exchange's trading facilities.
    The CHX Connect service is entirely optional and Participants are
not required to utilize it to send order to the Exchange or elsewhere.
The Exchange notes that the routing and connectivity services of CHX
Connect appear to be very similar manner to those offered by the Secure
Financial Transaction Infrastructure[reg] (``SFTI'') system, which is
provided by NYSE Technologies, an affiliated company of the New York
Stock Exchange, Inc. By competing with SFTI and other service providers
of secure connectivity among market participants, CHX Connect would
offer additional options for participants looking for systems to
deliver their orders.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such
shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of

investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CHX-2011-14 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CHX-2011-14. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CHX-2011-14 and should be
submitted on or before July 27, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-16854 Filed 7-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14778-14779]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6014]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2011-0239; FRL-9512-9]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; NSPS for Grain Elevators
(Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR which is abstracted below describes the
nature of the collection and the estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before April 12,
2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2011-0239, to: (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
(1) EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency,
Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center, Mail Code
28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB
at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Learia Williams, Office of Compliance
Assessment and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail Code
2227A, Office of Compliance, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202)
564-4113; fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On May 9, 2011 (76 FR 26900), EPA sought comments on this ICR
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any additional
comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days
of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OECA-2011-0239, which is available for public viewing
online at http://www.regulations.gov or in person viewing at the
Enforcement and Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC),
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC The
EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number
for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://www.regulations.gov, to either submit or view public comments, access
the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, as EPA
receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For
further information about the electronic docket, go to
www.regulations.gov.
    Title: NSPS for Grain Elevators (Renewal).

    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1130.10, OMB Control Number 2060-0082.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on April 30, 2012.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Grain
Elevators were proposed on January 18, 1977 (40 CFR part 60, subpart
DD), promulgated on August 3, 1978, and amended on October 17, 2000 (65
FR 61759). These standards apply to each affected facility at any grain
terminal elevator or any grain storage elevator. The facilities are
each truck unloading station, truck loading station, barge and ship
loading station, railcar loading station, railcar unloading station,
grain dryer and all grain handling operations that commenced
construction, modification or reconstruction after August 3, 1978.
    Owners or operators of the affected facilities must make a one-
time-only report of the date of construction or reconstruction,
notification of the actual date of startup, notification of any
physical or operational change to existing facility that may increase
the rate of emission of the regulated pollutant, notification of
initial performance test; and results of initial performance test.
Owners or operators are also required to maintain records of the
occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction, or
any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative.
Performance tests are the Agency's records of a source's initial
capability to comply with emissions standards and not the operating
conditions under which compliance was to achieve. An annual summary
report is also required.
    All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority. In
the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are
sent directly to the EPA regional office. This information is being
collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 60, subpart DD, as
authorized in section 112 and 114(a) of the Clean Air Act. The required
information consists of emissions data and other information that have
been determined to be private.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for the EPA
regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15, and are
identified on the form and/or instrument, if applicable.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information estimated to average 10 hours
per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose and provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information; processing and
maintaining information; and disclosing and providing information. All
existing ways will have to adjust to comply with any previously
applicable instructions and requirements that have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners and operators of grain
elevators.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 200.
    Frequency of Response: Occasionally, initially and annually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 2,070.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $198,346, which includes $198,346 in
labor costs, no capital/startup costs and no operation and maintenance
(O&M) costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is no change in the labor hours in
this ICR compared to the previous ICR. This is due to two
considerations: (1) The regulations have not changed over the past
three years and are not anticipated to change over the next three
years; and (2) the growth rate for the industry is very low, negative
or non-existent, so there is no significant change in the overall
burden. However, there is an increase in the total labor and Agency
costs as currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved Burdens.
This increase is not due to any program changes. The change in cost
estimates reflects updated labors rates available from the Bureau of
Labor Statistics.

John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-6014 Filed 3-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: June 2, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 104)]
[Notices]
[Page 26394]
[DOCID:fr02jn09-54]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1147-000]

Ameren Services Company; Notice of Filing

May 22, 2009.
    Take notice that on May 15, 2009, Ameren Services Company as agent
for Central Illinois Light Company tendered for filing of an executed
service agreement for Wholesale Distribution Service with Illinois
Municipal Electric Agency on behalf of the Village of Riverton.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on June 5, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-12696 Filed 6-1-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 7, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36492-36494]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13326]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0320]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Fourth of July Fireworks North Myrtle Beach, SC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
in the navigable waters of Myrtle Beach, SC. This safety zone is
necessary to protect the public from hazards associated with launching
fireworks over navigable waters of the United States. This proposed
rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in the safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 22, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2016-0320 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant John Downing, Sector
Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843)
740-3184, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On April 14, 2016, the North Myrtle Beach Chamber of Commerce
notified the Coast Guard that it will be conducting a fireworks display
from 9:30 to 9:55 p.m. on July 4, 2016. The fireworks are to be
launched from the end of the Cherry Grove Fishing Pier in Myrtle Beach,
SC. Hazards from firework displays include accidental discharge of
fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling hot embers or other
debris. The Captain of the Port Charleston (COTP) has determined that
potential hazards associated with the fireworks to be used in this
display would be a safety concern for anyone within a 500-yard radius
of the pier.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the navigable waters within a 500-yard radius of the fireworks
barge before, during, and after the scheduled event.

The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone from 9:15 p.m. to 10
p.m. on July 4, 2016. The safety zone would cover all navigable waters
within 500 yards of the Cherry Grove pier located on the Atlantic
Ocean. The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the safety of
vessels and these navigable waters before, during, and after the
scheduled 9:30 to 9:55 p.m. fireworks display. No vessel or person
would be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory
text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic
would be able to safely transit around this safety zone which would
impact a small designated area of the Atlantic Ocean for less than 1
hour during the evening when vessel traffic is normally low. Moreover,
the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM
marine channel 16 about the zone, and the rule would allow vessels to
seek permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety
zone lasting less than 1 hour that would prohibit entry within 500
yards of the Cherry Grove Pier. Normally such actions are categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary environmental analysis
checklist and Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add a temporary Sec.  165.T07-0320 under the undesignated center
heading Seventh Coast Guard District to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T07-0320  Safety Zone; Fourth of July Fireworks North Myrtle
Beach, SC.

    (a) This rule establishes a safety zone on all Atlantic Ocean
waters within a 500 yard radius of Cherry Grove Pier, from which
fireworks will be launched.
    (b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Charleston in the enforcement of the regulated
areas.
    (c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the
regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston
or a designated representative.
    (2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, or
remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the Port
Charleston by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or a designated representative
via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization. If authorization
to enter, transit through, or remain within the regulated area is
granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated
representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Charleston
or a designated representative.
    (3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene
designated representatives.
    (d) Enforcement period. This rule will be enforced on July 4, 2016
from 9:15 p.m. until 10 p.m.

    Dated: May 25, 2016.
G.L. Tomasulo,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2016-13326 Filed 6-6-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 45 (Monday, March 9, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12360-12364]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05031]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0834; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-045-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening of
comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier proposed Airworthiness Directive
(AD) for certain Airbus Model A330 series airplanes. The NPRM proposed
to require revising the maintenance program or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate certain maintenance requirements and
airworthiness limitations. The NPRM was prompted by a determination
that more restrictive maintenance requirements and airworthiness
limitations are necessary. This action revises the NPRM by proposing to
supersede AD 2007-05-12, AD 2009-18-20, and AD 2010-15-02 in addition
to those ADs already identified in the NPRM, as well as to require more
restrictive limitations and to add Airbus Model A330-323 airplanes to
the applicability. We are proposing this supplemental NPRM (SNPRM) to
address the aging effects of aircraft systems. Such aging effects could
change the characteristics of those systems, which, in isolation or in
combination with one or more other specific failures or events, could
result in failure of certain life limited parts, which could reduce the
structural integrity of the airplane or reduce the controllability of
the airplane. Since these actions impose an additional burden over
those proposed in the NPRM, we are reopening the comment period to
allow the public the chance to comment on these proposed changes.

DATES: We must receive comments on this SNPRM by April 23, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 45 80; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2013-0834 or in person at the
Docket Management

Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for the Docket Office (telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2013-
0834.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2013-0834;
Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-045-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Airbus issued A330 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part 4--
Aging Systems Maintenance, Revision 04, dated August 27, 2013, and
Airbus A330 ALS Part 4--Aging Systems Maintenance (ASM), Variation 4.1
and Variation 4.2, both dated July 23, 2014. This service information
describes preventative maintenance requirements and associated
airworthiness limitations applicable to aircraft systems susceptible to
aging effects. The actions described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI. This
service information is reasonably available; see ADDRESSES for ways to
access this service information.

Discussion

    On February 22, 2007, we issued AD 2007-05-12, Amendment 39-14973
(72 FR 10057, March 7, 2007), for certain Airbus Model A330, A340-200,
and A340-300 series airplanes. AD 2007-05-12 requires inspecting to
determine the part number of certain spoiler servo controls (SSCs) and
replacing any affected SSC with a new SSC. AD 2007-05-12 resulted from
a determination of a new load duty cycle defined by the manufacturer.
We issued AD 2007-05-12 to prevent fatigue cracking of certain SSCs,
which could result in hydraulic leakage and consequent loss of SSC
function and loss of the associated hydraulic system. These conditions
could affect all three hydraulic systems, which could result in reduced
controllability of the airplane.
    On August 26, 2009, we issued AD 2009-18-20, Amendment 39-16017 (74
FR 46313, September 9, 2009), for certain Airbus Model A330-300, A340-
200, and A340-300 series airplanes. AD 2009-18-20 requires
identification and modification of certain SSCs. AD 2009-18-20 resulted
from a report of a failure of a SSC whose maintenance cover had
ruptured due to pressure pulse fatigue. We issued AD 2009-18-20 to
prevent the loss of a hydraulic system due to leakage; loss of three
hydraulic systems could result in reduced controllability of the
airplane.
    On June 30, 2010, we issued AD 2010-15-02, Amendment 39-16368 (75
FR 42589, July 22, 2010), for certain Airbus Model A330-200 and -300
series airplanes, and A340-200, -300, -500, and -600 series airplanes.
AD 2010-15-02 requires repetitive detailed visual inspections for
corrosion and wear detection of the input gear boxes (IPGBs) and down
drive shafts (DDSs) on the flap tracks on both wings, and corrective
actions, as applicable. AD 2010-15-02 resulted from reports of
corrosion and damage on the DDSs and IPGBs on the flap tracks. We
issued AD 2010-15-02 to detect and correct corrosion and wear due to
absence of grease in the spline interfaces which could cause DDS
disconnection and result in a free movable flap surface, potentially
leading to aircraft asymmetry or even flap detachment, and reduce the
ability of the flightcrew to maintain the safe flight and landing of
the airplane.
    We issued an NPRM to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that
would apply to certain Airbus Model A330 series airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on November 7, 2013 (78 FR 66861).
    The NPRM proposed to supersede AD 2003-14-11, Amendment 39-13230
(68 FR 41521, July 14, 2003); AD 2004-11-08, Amendment 39-13654 (69 FR
31874, June 8, 2004); AD 2004-13-25, Amendment 39-13707 (69 FR 41394,
July 9, 2004); AD 2004-18-14, Amendment 39-13793 (69 FR 55326,
September 14, 2004); AD 2008-06-07, Amendment 39-15419 (73 FR 13103,
March 12, 2008; corrected April 15, 2008 (73 FR 20367)); and AD 2012-
04-07, Amendment 39-16963 (77 FR 12989, March 5, 2012) to require
actions intended to address the aging effects of aircraft systems. Such
aging effects could change the characteristics of those systems, which,
in isolation or in combination with one or more other specific failures
or events, could result in failure of certain life limited parts, which
could reduce the structural integrity of the airplane or reduce the
controllability of the airplane.

Actions Since the NPRM (78 FR 66861, November 7, 2013) Was Issued

    Since we issued the NPRM (78 FR 66861, November 7, 2013), we
received Airbus A330 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part 4--
Aging Systems Maintenance, Revision 04, dated August 27, 2013, and
Airbus A330 ALS Part 4--Aging Systems Maintenance (ASM), Variation 4.1
and Variation 4.2, both dated July 23, 2014, which contain more
restrictive maintenance requirements. We determined that more
restrictive maintenance requirements and airworthiness limitations are
necessary and that Airbus Model A330-323 airplanes need to be added to
the applicability of this AD in order to address the unsafe condition.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, also issued new EASA
AD 2013-0268, dated November 7, 2013 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition on certain Airbus Model A330 series
airplanes. EASA AD 2013-0268 supersedes and retains the requirements of
four EASA ADs and requires accomplishment of the actions specified in
Airbus A330 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part 4--Aging
Systems Maintenance, Revision 04, dated August 27, 2013. The MCAI
states:

    The airworthiness limitations for Airbus aeroplanes are
currently published in Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS)
documents.
    The airworthiness limitations applicable to the Ageing Systems
Maintenance (ASM) are

given in Airbus A330 ALS Part 4, which is approved by EASA.
    Revision 04 of Airbus A330 ALS Part 4 introduces more
restrictive maintenance requirements and/or airworthiness
limitations. Failure to comply with these instructions could result
in an unsafe condition.
    For the reason described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2012-0020, which is superseded, and requires
accomplishment of the actions specified in Airbus A330 ALS Part 4 at
Revision 04.
    In addition, this [EASA] AD also supersedes EASA AD 2006-0159,
EASA AD 2008-0026, and EASA AD 2008-0160 [which correspond to FAA
ADs 2007-05-12, Amendment 39-14973 (72 FR 10057, March 7, 2007);
2010-15-02, Amendment 39-16368 (75 FR 42589, July 22, 2010); and
2009-18-20, Amendment 39-16017 (74 FR 46313, September 9, 2009),
respectively], whose requirements applicable to A330 aeroplanes have
been transferred into Airbus A330 ALS Part 4.

The unsafe condition is the aging effects of aircraft systems. Such
aging effects could change the characteristics of those systems, which,
in isolation or in combination with one or more other specific failures
or events, could result in failure of certain life limited parts, which
could reduce the structural integrity of the airplane or reduce the
controllability of the airplane. You may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating it in Docket No. FAA-2013-0834.

Related Rulemaking

    We have issued AD 2014-23-17, Amendment 18033 (79 FR 71304,
December 2, 2014) for Airbus Model A340-211, -212, -213, -311, -312, -
313, -541, and -642 airplanes. AD 2014-23-17 terminates the
requirements of the following ADs for Airbus Model A340-211, -212, -
213, -311, -312, -313, -541, and -642 airplanes.
     AD 2003-14-11, Amendment 39-13230 (68 FR 41521, July 14,
2003);
     AD 2004-11-08, Amendment 39-13654 (69 FR 31874, June 8,
2004);
     AD 2004-13-25, Amendment 39-13707 (69 FR 41394, July 9,
2004);
     AD 2004-18-14, Amendment 39-13793 (69 FR 55326, September
14, 2004);
     AD 2007-05-12, Amendment 39-14973 (72 FR 10057, March 7,
2007);
     AD 2008-06-07, Amendment 39-15419 (73 FR 13103, March 12,
2008; corrected April 15, 2008 (73 FR 20367));
     AD 2009-18-20, Amendment 39-16017 (74 FR 46313, September
9, 2009);
     AD 2010-15-02, Amendment 39-16368 (75 FR 42589, July 22,
2010); and
     AD 2012-04-07, Amendment 39-16963 (77 FR 12989, March 5,
2012).

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this proposed AD. We have considered the comment received on the NPRM
(78 FR 66861, November 7, 2013) and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Add Airplane Model to the Applicability

    Delta Airlines (Delta) requested that we add Airbus Model A330-323
airplanes to paragraph (c), ``Applicability,'' of the NPRM (78 FR
66861, November 7, 2013).
    We agree. Airbus Model A330-323 airplanes were erroneously omitted
from the applicability. We have revised the applicability of this
proposed AD to add these airplanes.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This SNPRM

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of these
same type designs.
    This proposed AD would retain none of the requirements of the
following ADs:
     AD 2007-05-12, Amendment 39-14973 (72 FR 10057, March 7,
2007);
     AD 2009-18-20, Amendment 39-16017 (74 FR 46313, September
9, 2009); and
     AD 2010-15-02, Amendment 39-16368 (75 FR 42589, July 22,
2010).
    This proposed AD would require implementation of certain
maintenance requirements and airworthiness limitations and adding
Airbus Model A330-323 airplanes to the applicability. Certain changes
described above expand the scope of the NPRM (78 FR 66861, November 7,
2013). As a result, we have determined that it is necessary to reopen
the comment period to provide additional opportunity for the public to
comment on this SNPRM.

Differences Between This SNPRM and the Service Information

    This SNPRM proposes to incorporate Airbus A330 ALS Part 4--Aging
Systems Maintenance, Revision 04, dated August 27, 2013, including the
compliance times for the actions. However, the compliance times for
certain initial actions are different from those specified in Airbus
A330 ALS Part 4--Aging Systems Maintenance, Revision 04, dated August
27, 2013, because the actions and associated compliance times are
required by AD 2009-18-20, Amendment 39-16017 (74 FR 46313, September
9, 2009). Therefore, the initial compliance time for these actions is
relative to the effective date of the applicable superseded AD, as
specified in paragraphs (h)(5), (h)(6), and (h)(7) of this SNPRM.
    The MCAI specifies that if there are findings from the ALS
inspection tasks, corrective actions must be accomplished in accordance
with Airbus maintenance documentation. However, this AD does not
include that requirement. Operators of U.S.-registered airplanes are
required by general airworthiness and operational regulations to
perform maintenance using methods that are acceptable to the FAA. We
consider those methods to be adequate to address any corrective actions
necessitated by the findings of ALS inspections required by this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this SNPRM affects 79 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate that it would take about 2 work-hours per product to
comply with the new basic requirements of this SNPRM. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost $0 per product.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this SNPRM on U.S.
operators to be $13,430, or $170 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2003-14-11, Amendment 39-13230
(68 FR 41521, July 14, 2003); AD 2004-11-08, Amendment 39-13654 (69 FR
31874, June 8, 2004); AD 2004-13-25, Amendment 39-13707 (69 FR 41394,
July 9, 2004); AD 2004-18-14, Amendment 39-13793 (69 FR 55326,
September 14, 2004); AD 2007-05-12, Amendment 39-14973 (72 FR 10057,
March 7, 2007); AD 2008-06-07, Amendment 39-15419 (73 FR 13103, March
12, 2008; corrected April 15, 2008 (73 FR 20367)); AD 2009-18-20,
Amendment 39-16017 (74 FR 46313, September 9, 2009); AD 2010-15-02,
Amendment 39-16368 (75 FR 42589, July 22, 2010); AD 2012-04-07,
Amendment 39-16963 (77 FR 12989, March 5, 2012); and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2013-0834; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-
045-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by April 23, 2015.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD supersedes the ADs specified in paragraphs (b)(1)
through (b)(9) of this AD.
    (1) AD 2003-14-11, Amendment 39-13230 (68 FR 41521, July 14,
2003).
    (2) AD 2004-11-08, Amendment 39-13654 (69 FR 31874, June 8,
2004).
    (3) AD 2004-13-25, Amendment 39-13707 (69 FR 41394, July 9,
2004).
    (4) AD 2004-18-14, Amendment 39-13793 (69 FR 55326, September
14, 2004).
    (5) AD 2007-05-12, Amendment 39-14973 (72 FR 10057, March 7,
2007).
    (6) AD 2008-06-07, Amendment 39-15419 (73 FR 13103, March 12,
2008; corrected April 15, 2008 (73 FR 20367)).
    (7) AD 2009-18-20, Amendment 39-16017 (74 FR 46313, September 9,
2009).
    (8) AD 2010-15-02, Amendment 39-16368 (75 FR 42589, July 22,
2010).
    (9) AD 2012-04-07, Amendment 39-16963 (77 FR 12989, March 5,
2012).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -
243, -223F, -243F, -301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342,
and -343 airplanes; certificated in any category; all manufacturer
serial numbers.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05, Time Limits/
Maintenance Checks.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a determination that more restrictive
maintenance requirements and airworthiness limitations are
necessary. We are issuing this AD to address the aging effects of
aircraft systems. Such aging effects could change the
characteristics of those systems, which, in isolation or in
combination with one or more other specific failures or events,
could result in failure of certain life limited parts, which could
reduce the structural integrity of the airplane or reduce the
controllability of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Maintenance Program Revision and Actions

    Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, revise the
maintenance program or inspection program, as applicable, by
incorporating Airbus A330 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS)
Part 4--Aging Systems Maintenance, Revision 04, dated August 27,
2013, and Airbus A330 ALS Part 4--Aging Systems Maintenance (ASM),
Variation 4.1 and Variation 4.2, both dated July 23, 2014. The
initial compliance times for the actions are within the applicable
compliance times specified in the Record of Revisions pages of
Airbus A330 ALS Part 4--Aging Systems Maintenance, Revision 04,
dated August 27, 2013, Airbus A330 ALS Part 4--Aging Systems
Maintenance (ASM), Variation 4.1 and Variation 4.2, both dated July
23, 2014, or within 6 months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever is later, except as required by paragraph (h) of this AD.

(h) Exceptions to Initial Compliance Times

    (1) Where Airbus A330 ALS Part 4--Aging Systems Maintenance,
Revision 04, dated August 27, 2013, defines a calendar compliance
time for elevator servo-controls having part number (P/N) SC4800-2,
SC4800-3, SC4800-4, SC4800-6, SC4800-7, or SC4800-8 as ``August 31,
2004,'' the calendar compliance time is June 13, 2007 (34 months
after August 13, 2004 (the effective date of AD 2004-13-25,
Amendment 39-13707 (69 FR 41394, July 9, 2004))).
    (2) Where Airbus A330 ALS Part 4--Aging Systems Maintenance,
Revision 04, dated August 27, 2013, defines a calendar compliance
time for spoiler servo-controls (SSCs) having P/N 1386A0000-01, P/N
1386B0000-01, P/N 1387A0000-01 or P/N 1387B0000-01 as ``December 31,
2003,'' the calendar compliance time is November 19, 2005 (13 months
after October 19, 2004 (the effective date of AD 2004-18-14,
Amendment 39-13793 (69 FR 55326, September 14, 2004))).
    (3) Where Airbus A330 ALS Part 4--Aging Systems Maintenance,
Revision 04, dated August 27, 2013, defines a calendar compliance
time for elevator servo-controls having P/N SC4800-73, SC4800-93,
SC4800-103 and SC4800-113 as ``June 30, 2008,'' the calendar
compliance time is September 16, 2009 (17 months after April 16,
2008 (the effective date of AD 2008-06-07, Amendment 39-15419 (73 FR
13103, March 12, 2008; corrected April 15, 2008 (73 FR 20367)))).
    (4) The initial compliance time for replacement of the
retraction brackets of the main landing gear (MLG) having a part
number specified in paragraphs (h)(4)(i) through (h)(4)(xvi) of this
AD is before the accumulation of 19,800 total landings on the
affected retraction brackets of the MLG, or within 900 flight hours
after April 9, 2012 (the effective date of AD 2012-04-07, Amendment
39-16963 (77 FR 12989, March 5, 2012), whichever occurs later.

(i) 201478303
(ii) 201478304
(iii) 201478305
(iv) 201478306
(v) 201478307
(vi) 201478308
(vii) 201428380
(viii) 201428381
(ix) 201428382
(x) 201428383
(xi) 201428384
(xii) 201428385
(xiii) 201428378
(xiv) 201428379
(xv) 201428351
(xvi) 201428352

    (5) Where Airbus A330 ALS Part 4--Aging Systems Maintenance,
Revision 04, dated August 27, 2013, defines a calendar compliance
time for the modification of SSCs on three hydraulic circuits having
part numbers MZ4339390-01X, MZ4306000-01X,

MZ4339390-02X, MZ4306000-02X, MZ4339390-10X, or MZ4306000-10X as
``March 5, 2010,'' the calendar compliance time is April 14, 2011
(18 months after October 14, 2009 (the effective date of AD 2009-18-
20, Amendment 39-16017 (74 FR 46313, September 9, 2009))).
    (6) Where Note (6) of ``ATA 27-64-00 Flight Control--Spoiler
Hydraulic Actuation,'' of Sub-part 4-2-1, ``Life Limits,'' of Sub-
part 4-2, ``Systems Life Limited Components,'' of Airbus A330 ALS
Part 4--Aging Systems Maintenance, Revision 04, dated August 27,
2013, defines a calendar date of ``September 5, 2008,'' as a date
for the determination of accumulated flight cycles since the
aircraft initial entry into service, the date is October 14, 2009
(the effective date of AD 2009-18-20, Amendment 39-16017 (74 FR
46313, September 9, 2009)).
    (7) Where Note (6) of ``ATA 27-64-00 Flight Control--Spoiler
Hydraulic Actuation,'' of Sub-part 4-2-1, ``Life Limits,'' of Sub-
part 4-2, ``Systems Life Limited Components,'' of Airbus A330 ALS
Part 4--Aging Systems Maintenance, Revision 04, dated August 27,
2013, defines a calendar compliance time as ``March 5, 2010,'' for
the modification of affected servo controls, the calendar compliance
time is April 14, 2011 (18 months after October 14, 2009 (the
effective date of AD 2009-18-20, Amendment 39-16017 (74 FR 46313,
September 9, 2009))).

(i) No Alternative Actions or Intervals

    After accomplishing the revision required by paragraph (g) of
this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may
be used unless the actions or intervals are approved as an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (j)(1) of this AD.

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Information
may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(k) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2013-0268, dated
November 7, 2013, for related information. You may examine the MCAI
in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-0834-0003.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 20, 2015.
Victor Wicklund,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-05031 Filed 3-6-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: October 15, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 198)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 52894-52895]
[DOCID:fr15oc09-12]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0473; FRL-8956-8]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San
Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to the San Joaquin
Valley Air Pollution Control District portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions were proposed in the Federal
Register on July 13, 2009 and concern volatile organic compound (VOC)
emissions from graphic arts printing operations, digital printing
operations, adhesives, cleaning solvents, transfer of organic liquids,
and facilities engaged in coating of wood products, flat paneling,
paper, film, foil, and fabric. We are approving local rules that
regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in
1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on November 16, 2009.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0473 for
this action. The index to the docket is available electronically at
http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment
during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-
4126<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action

    On July 13, 2009 (74 FR 33399), EPA proposed to approve the
following rules into the California SIP.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Local agency               Rule          Rule title             Adopted        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SJVAPCD...............................            4606  Wood Products and Flat          10/16/08        12/23/08
                                                         Wood Paneling Product
                                                         Coating Operations.
SJVAPCD...............................            4607  Graphic Arts and Paper,         12/18/08        03/17/09
                                                         Film, Foil, and Fabric
                                                         Coatings.
SJVAPCD...............................            4624  Transfer of Organic             09/20/07        03/07/08
                                                         Liquid.
SJVAPCD...............................            4653  Adhesives...............        12/20/07        03/07/08
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they
complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rules and our evaluation.

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no comments.

III. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted that change our assessment that the
submitted rules comply with the relevant CAA requirements. Therefore,
as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving
these rules into the California SIP.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the

Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this action and other required information
to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the
rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not
a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 14, 2009. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: August 26, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

0
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(354)(i)(E)(3) and
(4), (363)(i)(A)(2) and (364) to read as follows:

Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (354) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (E) * * *
    (3) Rule 4624, ``Transfer of Organic Liquid,'' adopted on December
20, 2007.
    (4) Rule 4653, ``Adhesives,'' adopted on September 20, 2007.
* * * * *
    (363) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (2) Rule 4607, ``Graphic Arts and Paper, Film, Foil, and Fabric
Coatings,'' adopted on December 18, 2008.
0
(364) New and amended regulations were submitted on December 23, 2008
by the Governor's designee.
    (i) Incorporation by Reference.
    (A) San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District.
    (1) Rule 4606, ``Wood Products and Flat Wood Paneling Product
Coating Operations,'' adopted on October 16, 2008.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E9-24687 Filed 10-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P