                          THE U.S. PHASEOUT OF HCFCS:
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGES TO LABELING OF CONTAINERS OF HCFC FIRE SUPPRESSION AGENT, 2020-2029
                     U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                          Office of Air and Radiation
                       Stratospheric Protection Division
                         1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
                             Washington, DC 20460

                                   July 2019
Questions concerning this memo should be directed to:

Katherine Sleasman
Stratospheric Protection Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (6205T)
Washington, D.C. 20460
1-202-564-7716 (phone)
1-202-343-2338 (fax)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
This memo was prepared with support from ICF under contract number EP-BPA-16-H-0021.

Background
Under Title VI of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for developing and implementing programs that protect the stratospheric ozone layer. The EPA regulates the use of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) that are being phased out consistent with CAA Title VI and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (Montreal Protocol). The EPA is also implementing complementary measures under CAA Title VI, including a provision to require labeling to alert the public that a product contains or is manufactured with a substance known to harm public health and environment by destroying ozone in the upper atmosphere.
Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) are a class of ODS undergoing a phaseout in the United States and globally. Specifically, the United States is obligated to phase out production and consumption of HCFCs by 2030 by making graduated reductions in HCFC production and consumption by certain dates. The U.S. HCFC phasedown schedule is summarized in Table 1.
              Table 1: Detailed Regulatory HCFC Phaseout Schedule
Date
Restriction
January 1, 2003
 Ban on production and import of HCFC-141b.
January 1, 2010
 Ban on production and import of HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b except for on-going servicing demand in equipment manufactured before January 1, 2010.[a]
January 1, 2015
 Ban on production, import, and introduction into interstate commerce or use of HCFCs except where the HCFCs are used as a refrigerant in equipment manufactured prior to January 1, 2020, or where HCFCs are used as a fire suppression agent for non-residential applications.[a]
January 1, 2020
 Ban on remaining production and import of HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b.[a]
 Ban on production and import of all other HCFCs except for use in servicing AC and refrigeration equipment[b] manufactured before January 1, 2020.
January 1, 2030
 Ban on production and import of all HCFCs.[a]
    [a] Exemptions apply, including exemptions for 1) HCFCs used in processes resulting in their transformation or destruction, and 2) HCFCs that are recovered and either recycled or reclaimed.
    [b] The EPA is proposing to allow servicing of fire suppression equipment with newly-imported HCFCs until January 1, 2030 following the November 2018 adjustment to the Montreal Protocol (Decision XXX/2).

Product labeling is mandated by Section 611 of the CAA, and requirements are specified in Title 40 Part 82 Subpart E in the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 82.100 - 82.124). Products imported or manufactured after January 1, 2015 that contain or were manufactured with HCFCs must bear a clearly legible and conspicuous warning label that can be read by consumers before they can be introduced into interstate commerce (EPA 2013):

WARNING: [Contains / Manufactured with] [insert name of HCFC], a substance that harms public health and environment by destroying ozone in the upper atmosphere.
WARNING: [Contains / Manufactured with] [insert name of HCFC], a substance that harms public health and environment by destroying ozone in the upper atmosphere.
HCFC-123 -- the primary constituent in Halotron I (also referred to as HCFC Blend B) -- is currently used as a streaming agent in fire suppression equipment including handheld extinguishers, wheeled extinguishers, and aircraft rescue and firefighting (ARFF) vehicles in various commercial, industrial, transportation, and military applications in the United States. After January 1, 2020, a distinction is drawn where only recovered and recycled or reclaimed HCFC-123, as well as stockpiled material imported prior to 2020, can be used to manufacture new fire suppression equipment, and newly imported material can only be used to service existing equipment.

Since HCFC-123 imported after January 1, 2020 can only be used to service fire suppression equipment manufactured prior to January 1, 2020, the EPA is proposing to revise the existing labeling requirements for certain containers of HCFC-123 fire suppression agent to provide clarity to the regulated community. These proposed changes would require redesign of labels already required under CAA Section 611. In particular, the EPA is proposing to revise labels for containers of fire suppression agent made with HCFC-123 imported after January 1, 2020 by adding language to inform anyone using that fire suppression agent that the contents can only be used to service equipment manufactured before January 1, 2020. The labels for all fire suppression agent containers made with HCFC-123 imported on or after January 1, 2020 would read:

WARNING: [Contains / Manufactured with] HCFC-123, a substance that harms public health and environment by destroying ozone in the upper atmosphere. Can only be used to service equipment manufactured prior to January 1, 2020.
WARNING: [Contains / Manufactured with] HCFC-123, a substance that harms public health and environment by destroying ozone in the upper atmosphere. Can only be used to service equipment manufactured prior to January 1, 2020.

The EPA is requesting comment on whether it should also require a modified label for containers made with recycled or reclaimed HCFC-123 or HCFC-123 imported before January 1, 2020:[2]

WARNING: [Contains / Manufactured with] HCFC-123, a substance that harms public health and environment by destroying ozone in the upper atmosphere. Not restricted to use in servicing pre-2020 equipment.
WARNING: [Contains / Manufactured with] HCFC-123, a substance that harms public health and environment by destroying ozone in the upper atmosphere. Not restricted to use in servicing pre-2020 equipment.

The EPA is also requesting comment on whether there is another way to distinguish containers for servicing fire suppression equipment, such as having all containers labeled "Virgin material may not be used to service equipment manufactured on or after January 1, 2020," and then include additional labeling on containers that distinguish "virgin" vs. "reclaimed" material.

This analysis presents an estimate of the overall costs associated with these proposed revisions to labeling for containers of fire suppression agent manufactured with HCFC-123 e.g., Halotron I. It is assumed that the manufacturer of the HCFC-123 fire suppression agent will redesign the first label noted above. Additional, but minor, costs may be incurred if the manufacturer of the fire suppression agent also redesigns the label for containers made with recycled or reclaimed HCFC-123 or HCFC-123 imported before 2020.

Given all HCFC-123 containers would have redesigned labels, it is not expected that costs for the various labeling options that may require additional labels would increase significantly from one option to the other.
Methodology and Cost Assumptions
The costs to revise labels for fire suppression agent containers were calculated by estimating the one-time labor costs and printing preparation costs associated with redesigning the existing label for HCFC-123 fire suppressant agent containers manufactured between 2020 and 2029. Products containing HCFC-123 are assumed to require one-color vinyl sticker labels.

Companies producing HCFC-123 fire suppression agent are assumed to incur labeling redesign costs associated with the following:
 Administrative activities (e.g., work by purchasing, marketing, legal, and/or regulatory staff to initiate and approve label development or changes).
 Graphic design (e.g., work by a graphic designer to develop or alter the label).
 Prepress and engraving activities to convert the design created by the graphic designer into the film or files that are used to engrave or etch the printing plates or cylinders, and then engrave the plates or cylinders for printing.
These one-time costs for fire suppression agent labeling are assumed to be incurred on a company-level basis in response to proposed new labeling redesign requirements for the 2020 - 2029 regulatory period and are estimated based on information from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Labeling Cost Model (RTI 2003).
Administrative and graphic design labor costs are estimated based on the total number of hours required to redesign existing labels as well as hourly labor costs. Administrative and graphic design costs (one-color printing) for redesign were assumed to require half the amount of time estimated for new design activities in the FDA Labeling Cost Model, because the redesigned labels will be similar to the existing labels. The average hourly labor cost for a marketing manager (administrative) is $191.72 and the average hourly labor cost for a graphic designer is $70.16 (U.S. Department of Labor 2017a and 2017b). These hourly costs include wages, overhead rates, and fringe rates.
Prepress and engraving costs vary depending on the printing method used and the number of colors. For the purposes of this analysis, which assumes printing of vinyl sticker labels, companies are assumed to use flexographic printing with one color. The EPA assumes that the redesigned labels will have similar dimensions (i.e., in accordance with 40 CFR 82) and will be constructed with the same material (i.e., vinyl) as the existing label. Therefore, the EPA expects that printing the redesigned labels will cost the same amount as printing the existing label.
Results
The labor and printing preparation costs associated with redesigning labels for HCFC-123 fire suppression agent containers are summarized in Table 2. The calculated labor cost includes the administrative labor costs and graphic design labor costs associated with redesigning the labels. The prepress and engraving costs are estimated to be between $501 and $1,333 per label. The total cost per producer includes labor costs and prepress and engraving costs.
   Table 2. Labor and Printing Preparation Costs of Labeling Redesign (2017$)
Criteria
                                Lower Estimate
                               Central Estimate
                                Higher Estimate
Administrative Hours (Redesign)[a]
                                      1.5
                                      3.5
                                      5.5
Administrative Labor Costs (Redesign)[b]
                                     $288
                                     $671
                                    $1,054
Graphic Design Hours (Redesign)[a]
                                      3.8
                                      5.6
                                      7.5
Graphic Design Labor Cost (Redesign)[b]
                                     $263
                                     $395
                                     $526
Subtotal for Labor Costs[c]
                                     $551
                                    $1,066
                                    $1,580
Prepress Costs (per label)
                                     $311
                                     $330
                                     $698
Engraving Costs (per label)
                                     $190
                                     $254
                                     $635
Subtotal for Prepress and Engraving Costs (per label)
                                     $501
                                     $584
                                    $1,333
Total Cost per Producer[d]
                                    $1,052
                                    $1,650
                                    $2,913
  Sources: RTI (2003), U.S. Department of Labor (2017a and 2017b)
  a The hours shown are rounded to the nearest tenth of an hour.
  [b] Labor cost totals may not reflect independent rounding of hours shown in the table.
  [c] The labor costs are assumed to be the same if producers also redesign the label for containers made with recycled/reclaimed HCFC-123 or HCFC-123 imported before 2020.
  [d] If producers also redesign the label for containers made with recycled/reclaimed HCFC-123 or HCFC-123 imported before 2020, the prepress and engraving costs will double, and the total cost per producer is estimated to be between $1,553 and $4,246.
References
RTI. 2003. FDA Labeling Cost Model: Final Report. Prepared for DHHS/PHS/FDA/CFSAN/OSAS/DMST by RTI. Revised January 2003. Available online at: http://foodrisk.org/default/assets/File/labeling_cost_model.pdf.

U.S. Department of Labor. 2017a. Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2017. 27-1024 Graphic Designers. Available online at: http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes271024.htm.

U.S. Department of Labor. 2017b. Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2017. 11-2021 Marketing Managers. Available online at: https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes112021.htm.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2013. Labeling HCFC Products Starting 2015: What You Need to Know. Office of Air and Radiation (6205J). EPA-402-E-13-001. August 2013. Available online at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-07/documents/labeling_hcfc_products_starting_2015_what_you_need_to_know.pdf.


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 144 (Friday, July 30, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41115-41123]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16232]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-92501; File No. SR-LCH SA-2021-001]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; LCH SA; Order Approving Proposed
Rule Change Relating to the Clearing of Single-Name Credit Default
Swaps by U.S. Customers

July 26, 2021.

I. Introduction

    On April 13, 2021, Banque Centrale de Compensation, which conducts
business under the name LCH SA (``LCH SA''), filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend LCH
SA's (i) CDS Clearing Rule Book (the ``Rule Book''); (ii) CDS Clearing
Supplement (the ``Clearing Supplement''); (iii) CDS Clearing Procedures
(the ``Procedures''); and (iv) FCM Clearing Regulations (``Clearing
Regulations'') to allow LCH SA to offer clearing services in respect of
single-name CDS that are security-based swaps (``SBS'') submitted by
Clearing Members on behalf of their U.S. clients.\3\ The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on May 3,
2021.\4\ On June 10, 2021, the Commission designated a longer period
within which to take action on the proposed rule change, until August
1, 2021.\5\ The Commission did not receive comments regarding the
proposed rule change. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission
is approving the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the
meanings specified in the Rule Book, the Clearing Supplement, the
Procedures, and the Clearing Regulations, as applicable.
    \4\ Self-Regulatory Organizations; LCH SA; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Clearing of Single-Name Credit
Default Swaps by U.S. Customers, Exchange Act Release No. 34-91676
(April 26, 2021); 86 FR 23445 (May 3, 2021) (SR-LCH SA-2021-001)
(``Notice'').
    \5\ Self-Regulatory Organizations; LCH SA; Notice of Designation
of Longer Period for Commission Action on Proposed Rule Change
Relating to the Clearing of Single-Name Credit Default Swaps by U.S.
Customers, Exchange Act Release No. 34-92142 (June 10, 2021); 86 FR
32079 (June 16, 2021) (SR-LCH SA-2021-001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change

    Currently, LCH SA's Clearing Members are permitted to submit for
clearing swaps on behalf of their U.S. clients. The proposed rule
change would amend the LCH SA documents mentioned above to permit LCH
SA's Clearing Members also to submit for clearing SBS on behalf of
their U.S. clients. Thus, after the proposed rule change becomes
effective, LCH SA would permit its Clearing Members to submit for
clearing both swaps and SBS on behalf of their U.S. clients.
    In addition to this initiative, the proposed rule change would also
make certain other confirming and clarifying changes, as discussed
further below in Part II.E.

A. Rule Book

    To facilitate this initiative, the proposed rule change would amend
the Rule Book to, among other things, (i) modify existing and adopt new
defined terms; (ii) modify the membership requirements applicable to
Clearing Members; (iii) remove provisions that prohibit Clearing
Members from offering clearing services to U.S. clients with respect to
SBS; (iv) establish the account structure for Clearing Members clearing
SBS on behalf of U.S. clients; (v) update provisions to apply them to
Clearing Members that are broker-dealers; and (vi) amend the Appendix
to apply relevant provisions of the CDS Default Management Process to
SBS. These amendments are discussed below according to the different
titles of the Rule Book.
i. Title I
    The proposed rule change would add new, and modify existing,
defined terms related to Clearing Members and Clients found in Title I
of the Rule Book. These changes would facilitate registered broker-
dealers becoming Clearing Members for the purpose of clearing SBS on
behalf of U.S. clients. For example, the proposed rule change would add
a definition for ``BD,'' to mean a legal entity that is a ``broker'' or
``dealer'' as defined in Section 3(a)(4) or 3(a)(5) of the Act,
respectively, and is registered in such capacity with the Commission
and a member in good standing of FINRA. Similarly, the proposed rule
change would amend the defined term ``FCM Clearing Member'' to be
``FCM/BD Clearing Member.'' As amended, the term ``FCM/BD Clearing
Member'' would mean any FCM, BD, or

legal entity that is both an FCM and BD that has been admitted to LCH
SA as a clearing member. The proposed rule change would make a similar
modification to the defined term ``FCM Client,'' which would become
``FCM/BD Client.''
    Similarly, the proposed rule change would modify a number of
defined terms and add new defined terms that relate to the account
structure in which transactions would be recorded and collateral for
Cleared Swaps and SBS would be held. Among other changes, the proposed
rule change would add a new defined term for ``Cleared Swap,'' which
would be used to differentiate between ``swaps'' and ``SBS'' and their
different account structures and add new defined terms for ``Cleared
Swaps Customer'' and ``Cleared Swaps Customer Collateral.'' Overall,
these changes would establish three account structures: (i) A separate
account structure for Cleared Swaps; (ii) a separate account structure
for SBS; and (iii) an account structure in which an FCM/BD Clearing
Member that is both an FCM and a BD may elect to clear and hold margin
for FCM/BD Cleared Transactions that are SBS for FCM/BD Clients on a
commingled basis with Cleared Swaps.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Order Granting Conditional Exemptions Under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in Connection With Portfolio
Margining of Swaps and Security-Based Swaps, Exchange Act Release
No. 68433 (Dec. 14, 2012); 77 FR 75211 (Dec. 19, 2012) (``Portfolio
Margining Order'') (setting out certain conditions that dually
registered clearing agencies/derivatives clearing organizations and
participating BD/FCMs must satisfy when offering a program to
commingle and portfolio margin cleared CDS for customer positions).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Moreover, the proposed rule change would amend certain terms with
respect to legal jurisdictions to reflect the availability of clearing
SBS for U.S. clients. Specifically, the proposed rule change would
modify the term ``Non-U.S. CCM'' to mean, when used in the context of
an Original Transaction, a CCM that has its residence in, is organized
under the laws of, or has its principal place of business located in, a
jurisdiction other than the United States, its territories or
possessions and is not a registered BD or FCM. Similarly, the proposed
rule change would modify the term ``U.S. CCM Client'' to mean a Client
of an FCM or a BD or any Client that has its residence in, is organized
under the laws of, or has its principal place of business located in
the United States, its territories or possessions.
    Finally, the proposed rule change would make clarifying and
conforming changes to other defined terms, and other Articles of Title
I of the Rule Book, to reflect these changes. These changes would
update references to Clearing Members to apply them to FCM/BD Clearing
Members instead of just FCM Clearing Members.
ii. Title II and Title III
    The proposed rule change would next amend Title II and Title III of
the Rule Book, which relate to the requirements applicable to LCH SA's
Clearing Members and LCH SA's clearing operations. First, the proposed
rule change would amend Article <IP_ADDRESS> of the Rule Book to provide
that, without prejudice to the membership requirements set out in the
CDS Clearing Rules and applicable law, both FCMs and BDs are eligible
to become FCM/BD Clearing Members. Second, the proposed rule change
would amend Article <IP_ADDRESS> to define a BD's ``net capital'' as its net
capital as provided in SEC Rule 15c3-1.
    The proposed rule change would also make conforming changes
throughout Title II and in Article <IP_ADDRESS> of Title III to apply them
to an FCM/BD Clearing Member instead of just an FCM Clearing Member.
These changes would update references to Clearing Members to apply them
to FCM/BD Clearing Members instead of just FCM Clearing Members.
iii. Title IV
    The proposed rule change would also amend Title IV regarding risk
management, specifically, Article <IP_ADDRESS>, which relates to the return
of excess collateral. Under Article <IP_ADDRESS> as revised, if (i) the FCM/
BD Margin Balance of an FCM/BD Client Financial Account exceeds the
relevant FCM/BD Client Margin Requirement prior to the Morning Call or
(ii) the value of the Collateral attributed to the FCM/BD Buffer
Financial Account exceeds the FCM/BD Client Collateral Buffer
Threshold, then LCH SA would treat the excess as follows. If the excess
is related to Cleared Swaps, it would be reclassified as FCM/BD Swaps
Unallocated Client Excess Collateral, and thereafter may be returned to
the FCM/BD Clearing Member upon request in the conditions set out in
Section 3 of the Procedures, subject to Article 6.2.5 of the Rule Book.
If the excess is related to SBS (excluding SBS that are held in the
FCM/BD Swaps Client Account Structure as Cleared Swaps, as described
below), it would be reclassified as FCM/BD SBS Client Excess
Collateral, and thereafter may be returned to the FCM/BD Clearing
Member upon request in the conditions set out in Section 3 of the
Procedures, subject to Article 6.2.5 of the Rule Book.
    The proposed rule change would also make conforming changes
throughout Title IV to apply the articles to an FCM/BD Clearing Member
instead of just an FCM Clearing Member. These changes would update
references to Clearing Members to apply them to FCM/BD Clearing Members
instead of just FCM Clearing Members.
iv. Title V
    The proposed rule change next would amend Title V, regarding CDS
Client Clearing Services provided by a CCM. Here the proposed rule
change would amend Article <IP_ADDRESS> to permit LCH SA's Clearing Members
to submit for clearing SBS on behalf of their U.S. clients. Currently,
Article <IP_ADDRESS> prohibits a Non-U.S. Clearing Member from offering
client clearing services to any U.S. client with respect to SBS and any
U.S. Clearing Member from offering client clearing services to any
client with respect to SBS. The proposed rule change would delete this
provision.
    The proposed rule change also would amend another provision of
Article <IP_ADDRESS> that currently prohibits a Clearing Member from
offering clearing services to any U.S. client (other than an affiliate
of the Clearing Member) with respect to an Original Transaction that is
not SBS, unless the Clearing Member meets the specified conditions. As
amended, this provision would prohibit a Clearing Member from offering
clearing services to any U.S. client, other than an affiliate of the
Clearing Member, with respect to swaps and SBS, unless the Clearing
Member (i) is an FCM/BD and (ii) has provided LCH SA with an opinion of
counsel confirming that the provision of clearing services would not be
contrary to applicable law.
v. Title VI
    The proposed rule change would amend Title VI, regarding FCM/BD
client clearing. First, Article <IP_ADDRESS>(vi) currently prohibits an FCM
Clearing Member from providing CDS Client Clearing Services (defined as
clearing services in respect of CDS and/or Index Swaptions provided by
a Clearing Member to its Clients) to any client. The proposed rule
change would delete this prohibition.
    The proposed rule change next would amend Article <IP_ADDRESS>, which
currently specifies the account structure that LCH SA must open and
maintain for each FCM Clearing Member that provides client clearing
services for swaps. The proposed rule change would amend this article
so that it specifies the client account structure for an FCM/BD
Clearing Member providing client clearing services for swaps and SBS.
Thus, the proposed rule change would

add a new subsection (ii) that specifies the accounts that would make
up the FCM/BD SBS Client Account Structure. This structure would mirror
the structure applicable to swaps.
    Thus, under the proposed rule change, Article <IP_ADDRESS>(i) would set
forth the required account structure for an FCM (which may also be a
BD) with respect to any Cleared Swaps, which would include:
     An FCM/BD Swaps Client Trade Account for each Cleared
Swaps Customer;
     An FCM/BD Swaps Client Margin Account for each Cleared
Swaps Customer;
     An FCM/BD Swaps Client Financial Account for each Cleared
Swaps Customer;
     An FCM/BD Swaps Unallocated Client Collateral Financial
Account;
     An FCM/BD Swaps Buffer Financial Account; and
     An FCM/BD Swaps Client Collateral Account.
    Likewise, Article <IP_ADDRESS>(ii) would set forth the required account
structure for a BD (which may also be an FCM) with respect to any SBS
(excluding SBS that are permitted to be held in an account with Cleared
Swaps), which would include:
     An FCM/BD SBS Client Trade Account for each SBS Customer;
\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ In furtherance of this change, the proposed rule change also
would amend Article <IP_ADDRESS>, which relates to the establishment of
trade accounts, to require LCH SA to open FCM/BD SBS Client Trade
Accounts for SBS Customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     An FCM/BD SBS Client Margin Account for each SBS Customer;
\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ In furtherance of this change, the proposed rule change also
would amend Article <IP_ADDRESS>, which relates to the establishment of
client margin accounts, to require LCH SA to open FCM/BD SBS Client
Margin Accounts for SBS Customers. Similarly, the proposed rule
change would amend Article <IP_ADDRESS> to provide that FCM/BD Cleared
Transactions (i) registered in an FCM/BD Swaps Client Trade Account
for a Cleared Swaps Customer will be allocated to the corresponding
FCM/BD Cleared Swaps Client Margin Account and (ii) registered in an
FCM/BD SBS Client Trade Account for an SBS Customer will be
allocated to the corresponding FCM/BD SBS Client Margin Account, for
the purpose of the determination of the Open Positions and NPV
Payment Requirements attributable to such FCM/BD Client.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     An FCM/BD SBS Client Financial Account for each SBS
Customer; \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ In furtherance of this change, the proposed rule change also
would amend Article <IP_ADDRESS>, which relates to the establishment of
Client Financial Accounts and related accounts, to require LCH SA to
open FCM/BD SBS Client Financial Accounts for SBS Customers, in
which LCH SA will record the value of Collateral provided by the
FCM/BD Clearing Member in respect of each such SBS Customer's Open
Positions in SBS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     An FCM/BD SBS Client Excess Collateral Financial Account;
\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ In furtherance of this change, the proposed rule change
also would amend Article <IP_ADDRESS>, which relates to the establishment
of Client Financial Accounts and related accounts, to require LCH SA
to open an FCM/BD SBS Client Excess Collateral Financial Account for
SBS Customers, in which LCH SA will record the value of FCM/BD SBS
Client Excess Collateral.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     An FCM/BD SBS Buffer Financial Account; \11\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ In furtherance of this change, the proposed rule change
also would amend Article <IP_ADDRESS>, which relates to the establishment
of Client Financial Accounts and related accounts, to require LCH SA
to open an FCM/BD SBS Buffer Financial Account for SBS Customers, in
which LCH SA will record the value of Collateral provided by the
FCM/BD Clearing Member as FCM/BD SBS Client Collateral Buffer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     An FCM/BD SBS Client Collateral Account.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ In furtherance of this change, the proposed rule change
also would amend Article <IP_ADDRESS>, which relates to the establishment
of Client Financial Accounts and related accounts, to require LCH SA
to open FCM/BD SBS Client Collateral Accounts for SBS Customers, in
which LCH SA will record the value of Collateral held by LCH SA in
the other accounts listed in Article <IP_ADDRESS>(ii) (such as the FCM/BD
SBS Client Financial Account and FCM/BD SBS Client Excess Collateral
Financial Account).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Moreover, the proposed rule change would add a new Article
<IP_ADDRESS>(iii) to provide that an FCM/BD Clearing Member that is both an
FCM and a BD may elect to clear and hold margin for FCM/BD Cleared
Transactions that are SBS for FCM/BD Clients in the FCM/BD Swaps Client
Account Structure on a commingled basis with Cleared Swaps, and margin
such combined positions on a portfolio basis in compliance with
Applicable Laws.\13\ This provision would be subject to the condition
that each FCM/BD Client participating in the portfolio margining must
be an eligible contract participant as defined in Section 1a(18) of the
Commodity Exchange Act.\14\ Upon such election, FCM/BD Cleared
Transactions that are SBS would be included as Cleared Swaps and
maintained in the FCM/BD Swaps Client Account Structure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Portfolio Margin Order, 77 FR 75211.
    \14\ 7 U.S.C. 1a(18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change also would add a new article regarding the
return of excess collateral. Under new Article <IP_ADDRESS>, an FCM/BD
Clearing Member is not permitted to maintain any FCM/BD Client Excess
Collateral on a day-to-day basis with respect to SBS, but may hold FCM/
BD Client Excess Collateral on an intraday basis. LCH SA would be
required to transfer the value of any FCM/BD Client Excess Collateral
that is reflected in any FCM/BD SBS Client Financial Account of the
FCM/BD Clearing Member prior to the Morning Call to the FCM/BD Clearing
Member's FCM/BD SBS Client Excess Collateral Financial Account. In
addition, new Article <IP_ADDRESS>(iv) would require, among other things,
that LCH SA hold FCM/BD SBS Client Excess Collateral in the FCM/BD SBS
Client Excess Collateral Financial Account for the benefit of FCM/BD
Clearing Member's FCM/BD Clients that are SBS customers as a class in
accordance with SEC regulations and Applicable Law and that upon the
request of an FCM/BD Clearing Member, LCH SA would return FCM/BD SBS
Client Excess Collateral to such FCM/BD Clearing Member.
    The proposed rule change also would amend Article <IP_ADDRESS>, which
currently requires an FCM Clearing Member to collect collateral from
each client in respect of such client's open positions in an amount at
least equal to the greater of (i) the amount required by LCH SA for the
FCM Client Margin Account for such client or (ii) such higher amount as
required in Section 2 of the Procedures. The proposed rule change would
amend this Article to apply it to FCM/BD Clearing Members and to add a
corresponding provision for client open positions in SBS in an amount
at least equal to the amount required by LCH SA for the FCM/BD SBS
Client Margin Accounts.
    Finally, the proposed rule change would make conforming changes
throughout Title VI by updating references to Clearing Members to
ensure that the articles apply to an FCM/BD Clearing Member instead of
just an FCM Clearing Member.
vi. Appendix
    Appendix 1 of the Rule Book describes LCH SA's CDS Default
Management Process. The proposed rule change would amend the defined
term ``Transaction Categories,'' which currently sets out the different
categories of transactions that LCH SA clears. The proposed rule change
would amend the definition of ``Transaction Categories'' to include
``Single Name Cleared Transactions.'' This change would help ensure
that LCH SA's default management process applies to SBS.
    The proposed rule change also would amend Clause 3.3 of Appendix 1,
which sets out the applicable U.S. law and regulation that LCH SA would
act in accordance with in carrying out the CDS Default Management
Process, such as the Exchange Act and SEC regulations. The proposed
rule change would add to Clause 3.3 a reference to the new defined term
``SIPC'' in Section 1.1.1 of the Rule Book, such that LCH SA would act
in accordance with SIPC in carrying out the CDS Default Management
Process, in addition to the other U.S. laws and regulations currently
listed in Clause 3.3. Under the proposed rule change, ``SIPC'' would be
defined as the

Securities Investor Protection Corporation or any successor thereto.
    The proposed rule change would revise Clause 5.4, which relates to
competitive bidding in a default auction. Currently under Clause 5.4,
all Non-Defaulting Clearing Members are required to participate in
Competitive Bidding for each Auction Package notwithstanding that any
Non-Defaulting Clearing Member may not have registered within its
Account Structure a Cleared Transaction of the type included in the
relevant Transaction Category for an Auction Package, subject to
certain exceptions. As proposed to be revised, under Clause 5.4 a Non-
Defaulting Clearing Member that is a BD but not an FCM would not be
required to participate in Competitive Bidding for an Auction Package
containing any Cleared Swaps and a Non-Defaulting Clearing Member that
is an FCM but not a BD would not be required to participate in
Competitive Bidding for an Auction Package containing any SBS.
    The proposed rule change also would make conforming changes
throughout Appendix 1 to apply Appendix 1 to an FCM/BD Clearing Member
instead of just an FCM Clearing Member. Specifically, references to
Clearing Members would be updated to apply them to FCM/BD Clearing
Members instead of just FCM Clearing Members.

B. Clearing Supplement

    Similar to some of the changes to the Rule Book discussed above,
the proposed rule change would make conforming changes to apply the
Clearing Supplement to an FCM/BD Clearing Member instead of just an FCM
Clearing Member. These changes would update references to Clearing
Members to apply them to FCM/BD Clearing Members instead of just FCM
Clearing Members.

C. Procedures

    The proposed rule change would amend Sections 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the
Procedures.
i. Section 2
    Similar to the changes to the Rule Book and Clearing Supplement
discussed above, in Section 2 of the Procedures, the proposed rule
change would make conforming changes to apply Section 2 to an FCM/BD
Clearing Member instead of just an FCM Clearing Member. These changes
would update references to Clearing Members to apply them to FCM/BD
Clearing Members instead of just FCM Clearing Members.
ii. Section 3
    Similar to the changes to the Rule Book and Clearing Supplement
discussed above, in Section 3 of the Procedures, the proposed rule
change would make conforming changes to apply Section 3 to an FCM/BD
Clearing Member instead of just an FCM Clearing Member. These changes
would update references to Clearing Members to apply them to FCM/BD
Clearing Members instead of just FCM Clearing Members.
    In addition, the proposed rule change would amend Section 3.3(b),
which relates to the Collateral Account structure, to add a reference
to the FCM/BD SBS Client Collateral Account. In this account LCH SA
would record the Collateral held by LCH SA for the benefit of an FCM/BD
Clearing Member's SBS Customers with respect to SBS. The value in this
account would be further divided among and recorded in three separate
accounts: (i) The FCM/BD SBS Client Financial Account; (ii) the FCM/BD
SBS Buffer Financial Account; and (iii) the FCM/BD SBS Client Excess
Collateral Financial Account.
    The proposed rule change would amend Section 3.7, which relates to
collection of Euro denominated cash collateral. As described in Section
3.7(a), LCH SA performs Collateral Calls using TARGET2 Accounts opened
in its name. The proposed rule change would amend Section 3.7(a) to
provide that LCH SA will perform Collateral Calls with respect to the
Clients of a Clearing Member using a TARGET2 Account. As described in
the proposed amendment, LCH SA would use this TARGET2 Account to make
Collateral Calls in relation to the Client Margin Requirements with
respect to SBS (excluding SBS held in the FCM/BD Swaps Client Account
Structure) and FCM/BD Client Collateral Buffer Threshold of each FCM/BD
Clearing Member.
    Similarly, the proposed rule change would amend Section 3.7(b),
which relates to the TARGET2 Accounts that a Clearing Member must hold.
Section 3.7(b) currently requires that a Clearing Member hold two
TARGET2 Accounts, one related to house margin and the other related to
client margin. The proposed rule change would add to these two accounts
a third account, relating to client margin with respect to SBS. Thus,
as revised, Section 3.7(b) would require that an FCM/BD Clearing Member
hold three TARGET2 Accounts for purposes of Collateral Calls in respect
of (i) its FCM/BD House Margin Requirement and FCM/BD House Excess
Collateral Threshold, (ii) its Client Margin Requirements with respect
to Cleared Swaps and FCM/BD Client Collateral Buffer Threshold, and
(iii) its Client Margin Requirements with respect to SBS (excluding SBS
that are held in the FCM/BD Swaps Client Account Structure) and FCM/BD
Client Collateral Buffer Threshold.
    The proposed rule change next would amend Section 3.7(g), which
relates to the return of Euro denominated cash collateral. Currently,
Section 3.7(g)(iv) allows a Clearing Member to request LCH SA to return
some or all FCM Unallocated Client Excess Collateral in the form of
Euro denominated Cash Collateral provided that the requested amount
does not exceed the FCM Unallocated Client Excess Collateral recorded
in its Client Collateral Account. The proposed rule change would amend
Section 3.7(g)(iv) to clarify that it applies to FCM/BD Clearing
Members, not just FCM Clearing Members. The proposed rule change also
would add to Section 3.7(g) a new paragraph (v), which would mirror
paragraph (iv) of Section 3.7(g) described above, but it would apply to
excess collateral related to SBS. Thus, under new Section 3.7(g)(v), a
Clearing Member may also request LCH SA to return some or all FCM/BD
SBS Client Excess Collateral in the form of Euro denominated Cash
Collateral provided that the requested amount does not exceed the FCM/
BD SBS Client Excess Collateral recorded in its FCM/BD SBS Client
Collateral Account.
    The proposed rule change also would amend Section 3.8, which sets
out the multi-currency accounts in which LCH SA holds non-Euro
Collateral provided by Clearing Members to meet house and client margin
requirements. Currently, Section 3.8(a) requires that LCH SA have two
multi-currency accounts for holding non-Euro Cash Collateral provided
by Clearing Members in respect of their clients. The proposed rule
change would add a third account, requiring that LCH SA have, with
respect to Clients of a Clearing Member, a multi-currency account used
to credit non-Euro, non-USD Cash Collateral which is transferred by an
FCM/BD Clearing Member to be recorded in its FCM/BD SBS Client
Collateral Account. This account would form part of the LCH SBS Client
Segregated Depository Account for purposes of the FCM/BD CDS Clearing
Regulations.
    Similarly, Section 3.8(b) currently requires that LCH SA have two
USD cash accounts for holding USD Cash Collateral provided by Clearing
Members in respect of their clients. The proposed rule change would add
a third account, requiring that LCH SA have,

with respect to Clients of a Clearing Member, an account used to credit
USD Cash Collateral which is transferred by FCM/BD Clearing Members to
be recorded in their FCM/BD SBS Client Collateral Account. This account
would form part of the LCH SBS Client Segregated Depository Account for
purposes of the FCM/BD CDS Clearing Regulations.
    With respect to the return of excess collateral, the proposed rule
change would amend Section 3.8(h) and (i), to provide for the return of
excess collateral in respect of SBS. These amendments would mirror the
provisions currently applicable to swaps.
    Finally, the proposed rule change would amend Section 3.18,
relating to cash payments and variation margin transfers. Currently,
Section 3.18(c) lists the accounts that LCH SA uses when making or
receiving Cash Payments and/or Variation Margin Collateral Transfer
obligations in USD. The proposed rule change would add to this list a
cash account used to debit or credit USD to satisfy Cash Payments and/
or Variation Margin Collateral Transfer obligations in USD with respect
to all relevant Client Cleared Transactions of each FCM/BD Clearing
Member that are SBS (excluding SBS that are held in the FCM/BD Swaps
Client Account Structure).
iii. Section 4
    Section 4 sets out certain requirements that a transaction must
satisfy to be eligible for clearing at LCH SA. Currently, Section 4.1
provides that (i) in respect of an FCM Client, a U.S. CCM Client of a
Non-U.S. CCM or a CCM Client of a U.S. CCM, the Original Transaction
may not be a Single Name CDS or any other SBS identified as such in a
Clearing Notice; and (ii) in respect of a Non-U.S. CCM Client, the
Original Transaction may not be a Single Name CDS or any other SBS
identified as such in a Clearing Notice unless such transaction is
cleared through a Non-U.S. CCM. The proposed rule change would delete
Section 4.1, thus permitting Clearing Members to submit SBS to LCH SA
for clearing on behalf of U.S. Clients.
iv. Section 5
    Section 5 of the Procedures specifies LCH SA's CDS Clearing
Operations Procedures and includes numerous references to ``FCM
Clearing Members.'' Similar to the changes to the Rule Book and
Clearing Supplement discussed above, the proposed rule change would
change these references from ``FCM Clearing Members'' to ``FCM/BD
Clearing Members.'' This would help ensure that the Clearing Operations
Procedures in Section 5 apply to FCM/BD Clearing Members instead of
just FCM Clearing Members.

D. Clearing Regulations

    The proposed rule change also would amend LCH SA's CDS Clearing
Regulations, which impose certain obligations on LCH SA's Clearing
Members and is divided into Regulations 1 through 6, as well as a
Definitions section appearing before Regulation 1. The proposed rule
change would first update certain of the defined terms found in the
Definitions section to reflect some of the changes discussed above. For
example, the proposed rule change would amend a number of defined terms
to use the term ``Cleared Swaps Customer,'' which, as discussed above,
the proposed rule change would add to the Rule Book. The proposed rule
change would also add the defined term ``LCH SBS Client Segregated
Depository Account,'' which, as discussed above, the proposed rule
change would reference in Section 3 of the Procedures.
    In Regulation 2 (Depository Accounts), the proposed rule change
would set out the relevant account structure for SBS. Under Regulation
2 as revised, each FCM/BD Clearing Member would be required to
establish and maintain an FCM/BD SBS Client Segregated Depository
Account on behalf of its SBS Customers in accordance with applicable
provisions of the Exchange Act and SEC regulations. An FCM/BD Clearing
Member would be required to maintain the FCM/BD SBS Client Segregated
Depository Account with a Bank in accordance with the Exchange Act and
SEC Regulations and the FCM/BD Clearing Member would be allowed to
commingle assets of all of its SBS Customers held in that account in a
single omnibus account established and maintained in accordance with
SEC regulations. LCH SA would designate the FCM/BD SBS Client
Segregated Depository Account maintained by each FCM/BD Clearing Member
as a ``Special Reserve Bank Account for the Exclusive Benefit of the
Cleared Security-Based Swap Customers'' of the FCM/BD Clearing Member
as provided in Exchange Act Rule 15c3-3(p).\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-3(p).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Similarly, under Regulation 2 as revised, LCH SA would be required
to establish and maintain a LCH SBS Client Segregated Depository
Account on behalf of the SBS Customers of FCM/BD Clearing Members, in
accordance with applicable provisions of the Exchange Act and SEC
regulations. LCH SA would be required to maintain the LCH SBS Client
Segregated Depository Account with a Bank in accordance with the
Exchange Act and SEC regulations and LCH SA would be allowed to
commingle assets of all of the SBS Customers in that account in a
single omnibus account established and maintained in accordance with
SEC regulations. Regulation 2 would further require that LCH SA hold in
the LCH SBS Client Segregated Depository Account all Collateral that is
deposited by FCM/BD Clearing Members in connection with SBS cleared on
behalf of SBS Customers (other than Collateral provided to satisfy the
Contribution Requirement of such FCM/BD Clearing Members). Moreover,
Regulation 2 would require that LCH SA maintain the LCH SBS Client
Segregated Depository Account separately from any and all assets of the
FCM/BD Clearing Members, or any other assets that LCH SA is holding for
clients (other than SBS Customers) and that the account contain no
assets other than Collateral deposited by FCM/BD Clearing Members in
connection with the clearing of SBS on behalf of their SBS Customers.
Finally, LCH SA would designate the LCH SBS Client Segregated
Depository Account as a ``Special Clearing Account for the Exclusive
Benefit of the Cleared Security-Based Swaps Customers'' of the FCM/BD
Clearing Member for purposes of the Exchange Act and SEC Regulations.
    The proposed rule change also would update Regulation 3 of the CDS
Clearing Regulations (Collateral), to apply to the LCH SBS Client
Segregated Depository Account. Under Regulation 3 as revised,
securities or cash held in the LCH SBS Client Segregated Depository
Account would be subject to a security interest in accordance with
Regulation 5 and no collateral deposited in the LCH SBS Client
Segregated Depository Account may be applied on or in respect of
payment or satisfaction of the FCM/BD Clearing Member's liabilities to
LCH SA.
    Similarly, the proposed rule change would update Regulation 4
(Transfer) to apply to BDs, SBS, and SBS Customers. Currently,
Regulation 4 requires that, if an FCM Clearing Member is a Defaulting
Clearing Member, any action by LCH SA pursuant to the Rule Book
(including the CDS Default Management Process) must be taken in
compliance with the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations and
applicable bankruptcy laws regarding the liquidation or transfer of FCM
Cleared Transactions carried by an FCM on behalf of its clients. Under
Regulation 4 as revised, if an FCM/BD Clearing Member is a

Defaulting Clearing Member, any action taken by LCH SA pursuant to the
Rule Book (including the CDS Default Management Process) must be taken
in compliance with the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations or
the Exchange Act and SEC regulations, as applicable, and applicable
bankruptcy laws regarding the liquidation or transfer of Cleared Swaps
carried by an FCM on behalf of its clients or SBS carried by a BD on
behalf of its SBS Customers. Moreover, under Regulation 4 as revised,
to the extent any transfer by an FCM/BD Clearing Member of open
contracts between its Proprietary Account and accounts of its FCM/BD
Clients, upon an FCM/BD Client default, is permitted pursuant to the
Rule Book (including the CDS Default Management Process) and the
Procedures, such transfer must be made subject to applicable provisions
of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations or the Exchange Act
and SEC regulations, as applicable, regarding segregation of assets.
Currently, this provision only applies to the Commodity Exchange Act
and CFTC regulations.
    The proposed rule change also would update Regulation 5 of the CDS
Clearing Regulations (Security Interest) to apply to BDs, SBS, and SBS
Customers. Currently, Regulation 5 provides that each FCM Clearing
Member grants LCH SA a first security interest in and a first priority
and unencumbered first lien upon any and all cash, securities,
receivables, rights and intangibles and any other Collateral or assets
deposited with or transferred to LCH SA, or otherwise held by LCH SA,
including all property deposited in an LCH Proprietary Depository
Account and in an LCH Cleared Swaps Client Segregated Depository
Account, as security for unconditional payment and satisfaction of the
obligations and liabilities of the FCM Clearing Member to LCH SA. The
proposed rule change would amend this provision so that it applies to
FCM/BD Clearing Members and the LCH SBS Client Segregated Depository
Account. The proposed rule change also would clarify that in no event
shall LCH SA's security interest in the Collateral in an LCH Cleared
Swaps Client Segregated Depository Account or an LCH SBS Client
Segregated Depository Account held on behalf of the FCM/BD Clearing
Member's Clients be exercised to satisfy any obligations or liabilities
of such FCM/BD Clearing Member other than in connection with
obligations or liabilities relating to Cleared Swaps cleared by such
FCM/BD Clearing Member on behalf of its Cleared Swaps Customers or
relating to SBS cleared by such FCM/BD Clearing Member on behalf of its
SBS Customers. Currently, this provision only applies to LCH Cleared
Swaps Client Segregated Depository Account and swaps clients.
    Finally, similar to the changes to the Rule Book, Clearing
Supplement, and Procedures discussed above, throughout the Clearing
Regulations the proposed rule change would make conforming changes to
apply the Clearing Regulations to an FCM/BD Clearing Member instead of
just an FCM Clearing Member. These changes would update references to
Clearing Members to apply them to FCM/BD Clearing Members instead of
just FCM Clearing Members, including changing the title of the document
to the ``FCM/BD CDS Clearing Regulations.'' The proposed rule change
would similarly add references to the Exchange Act when discussing
applicable law.

E. Additional Changes Unrelated to U.S. Client Clearing

    In addition to the changes discussed above related to U.S. client
clearing, the proposed rule change would make certain other changes not
directly related to that initiative. First, the proposed rule change
would amend Appendix 1 of the Rule Book (CDS Default Management
Process). As discussed above, Appendix 1 of the Rule Book describes LCH
SA's CDS Default Management Process. In Clause 5.4.4 (Minimum Bid
Size), the amendment would revise the current formula for LCH SA's
calculation of the Minimum Bid Size for each Non-Defaulting Clearing
Member by incorporating a 100% maximum cap, thus clarifying that a Non-
Defaulting Clearing Member would never be required to bid for more than
100% of the relevant Auction Package in a default auction. This
proposed change would also be consistent with existing Clause 5.4.6
(Bids in excess of the Minimum Bid Size), which prohibits a Non-
Defaulting Clearing Member from submitting Bid(s) whose Bid Size(s),
alone or in aggregate, exceed 100% of the relevant Auction Package. The
proposed rule change also would revise Clause 5.9.1 for LCH SA's
recalculation of Minimum Bid Sizes for Residual Auction Packages in a
potential second round of Competitive Bidding. Under existing Clause
5.9.1(i), LCH SA will reduce a Non-Defaulting Clearing Member's
original Minimum Bid Size as calculated in Clause 5.4.4 by an amount
equal to the Bid Credit, which is the percentage difference between the
Minimum Bid Size and the percentage of the aggregate of the Bid Sizes
of the Non-Defaulting Member's Initial Winning Bids. The proposed rule
change would provide that such recalculation is ``subject to the
maximum value for the Bid Credit of the Minimum Bid Size.''
    In Clause 8.1.1 of Appendix 1 of the Rule Book, the proposed rule
change would remove a reference to the Early Termination Trigger Date
at the end of the paragraph. Currently, that paragraph provides that
upon an Early Termination Trigger Date, other payment and delivery
obligations in relation to any Cleared Transactions and any other
obligations pursuant to the CDS Clearing Documentation (including
Collateral registered in any Collateral Accounts and other Collateral
representing a Clearing Member's Contribution Requirement) shall be
payable or deliverable on the Early Termination Trigger Date and in
accordance with the provisions of Clause 8.1.1. The proposed rule
change would retain this language but delete the reference to the Early
Termination Trigger Date at the end of the paragraph such that the
obligations shall be payable or deliverable in accordance with the
provisions of Clause 8.1.1, rather than on the Early Termination
Trigger Date and in accordance with the provisions of Clause 8.1.1.
This change would help to ensure consistency in the operation of the
Early Termination process since all payment and delivery obligations in
the context of the Early Termination process would be made at the date
and times as set out in the provisions of Clause 8.1.1. Thus, this
change would remove a potential inconsistency between the Early
Termination Trigger Date and the provisions of Clause 8.1.1.
    Finally, the proposed rule change would amend Regulation 6 of the
Clearing Regulations to implement CFTC Letter No. 19-17.\16\ Under CFTC
Letter No. 19-17, a Derivatives Clearing Organization may permit a
Futures Commission Merchant to treat the separate accounts of a
customer as accounts of separate entities subject to a number of
conditions provided for in that letter. Therefore, the proposed rule
change would amend Regulation 6(e) to allow Clearing Members to benefit
from this no-action relief regarding the withdrawal of the Cleared
Swaps Customer funds by providing that references to ``Cleared Swaps
Customer'' shall include all Cleared Swaps Customers for the same
beneficial

owner, unless the Clearing Member complies with the relevant conditions
set out in CFTC Letter No. 19-17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ CFTC Letter No 19-17 of July 10, 2019 (``Advisory and Time-
Limited No-Action Relief with Respect to the Treatment of Separate
Accounts by Futures Commission Merchants'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act directs the Commission to approve a
proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that
such proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such
organization.\17\ For the reasons given below, the Commission finds
that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F)
of the Act \18\ and Rules 17Ad-22(e)(1) and (e)(18).\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \19\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(1), (e)(18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Consistency With Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act

    Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires, among other things, that
the rules of LCH SA be designed to promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent
applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and transactions, as well
as to assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the
custody or control of LCH SA or for which it is responsible.\20\ As
discussed in more detail below, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As described above, the proposed rule change would make a number of
changes to the Rule Book, Clearing Supplement, Procedures, and Clearing
Regulations to permit LCH SA's Clearing Members to offer client
clearing services in respect of SBS to U.S. clients. Specifically, as
discussed in Part II.A, the proposed rule change would amend the Rule
Book to (i) add and update defined terms; (ii) modify the membership
requirements applicable to Clearing Members; (iii) remove provisions
that prohibit Clearing Members from offering clearing services to U.S.
clients with respect to SBS; (iv) permit broker-dealers to become
Clearing Members and update provisions to apply them to Clearing
Members that are broker-dealers; (v) establish the account structure
for Clearing Members clearing SBS on behalf of U.S. clients, including
the treatment of collateral posted by Clearing Members in respect of
client positions in SBS; and (vi) amend the Appendix to apply relevant
provisions of the CDS Default Management Process to SBS. The Commission
believes these changes would facilitate clearing of SBS for U.S.
clients by establishing the legal and operational framework for
Clearing Members to clear SBS on behalf of U.S. clients, thereby
promoting the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions by such clients at LCH SA. Similarly, the
changes with respect to collateral posted by Clearing Members in
respect of client positions in SBS would help to ensure that such
collateral is subject to the provisions of LCH SA's Rule Book regarding
the protection of collateral, including the return of excess
collateral, thereby helping to assure the safeguarding of securities
and funds in LCH SA's custody and control. Because the changes to the
Clearing Supplement discussed in Part II.B above would further these
changes to the Rule Book by making conforming changes to apply the
Clearing Supplement to an FCM/BD Clearing Member instead of just an FCM
Clearing Member, the Commission believes the changes to the Clearing
Supplement also would promote the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions and assure the safeguarding of
securities and funds in LCH SA's custody and control.
    As discussed in Part II.C, the proposed changes to the Procedures
would (i) make conforming changes to apply them to an FCM/BD Clearing
Member instead of just an FCM Clearing Member; (ii) require that LCH SA
and Clearing Members establish and use certain accounts to hold and
transfer cash and other collateral for satisfying margin requirements
in connection with client positions in SBS; (iii) establish procedures
for the return of excess collateral related to client positions in SBS;
and (iv) remove provisions that currently prohibit LCH SA from
accepting SBS transactions in respect of U.S. clients. Like the changes
to the Rule Book and Clearing Supplement, the Commission believes these
changes would facilitate clearing of SBS for U.S. clients by
establishing the financial accounts and operational framework needed
for clearing client positions in SBS and removing provisions that
currently prohibit LCH SA from accepting SBS transactions in respect of
U.S. clients, thereby promoting the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of those securities transactions at LCH SA. Moreover, in
requiring the establishment and use of certain accounts to hold and
transfer cash and other collateral for satisfying margin requirements,
and in establishing procedures for the return of excess collateral
related to client positions in SBS, these proposed changes would help
to assure the safeguarding of securities and funds in LCH SA's custody
and control.
    For similar reasons, the Commission finds the proposed changes to
the Clearing Regulations also are consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F)
of the Act.\22\ Requiring that Clearing Members and LCH SA establish
accounts with a Bank for holding collateral on behalf of SBS Customers
and requiring that the accounts be maintained separately from any and
all assets of the FCM/BD Clearing Members, or any other assets that LCH
SA is holding for clients (other than SBS Customers), should promote
the safekeeping of SBS Customers' collateral, thereby assuring
safeguarding of securities and funds in LCH SA's custody and control.
Similarly, in amending Regulation 3 and Regulation 5 to clarify that
the security interest granted to LCH SA applies to FCM/BD Clearing
Members and the LCH SBS Client Segregated Depository Account and that
no collateral deposited in the LCH SBS Client Segregated Depository
Account may be applied on or in respect of payment or satisfaction of
any of the FCM/BD Clearing Member's liabilities to LCH SA, the
Commission believes the proposed rule change should help to assure that
SBS Customers' collateral is not misapplied to satisfy a Clearing
Member's liabilities, again assuring the safeguarding of securities and
funds in LCH SA's custody and control. Moreover, amending Regulation 4
to require that any action by LCH SA pursuant to the Rule Book
(including the CDS Default Management Process) be taken in compliance
with the Exchange Act and SEC regulations as well as applicable
bankruptcy laws regarding the liquidation or transfer of SBS carried by
a BD on behalf of its clients, should help to assure the safekeeping of
SBS Customers' collateral after the default of a Clearing Member.
Finally, making conforming changes to apply the Clearing Regulations to
an FCM/BD Clearing Member instead of just an FCM Clearing Member should
help to assure the applicability of these provisions to SBS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Commission finds the other changes unrelated to U.S.
client clearing, discussed in Part II.E above, are also consistent with
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.\23\ Amending Appendix 1 of the Rule
Book to provide that each Non-Defaulting Clearing Member would never be
required to bid

for more than 100% of the relevant Auction Package and to remove a
reference to the Early Termination Trigger Date at the end of the
paragraph would correct existing drafting errors in clauses pertaining
to the CDS Default Management Process. Correcting these errors should
help to ensure that the CDS Default Management Process is applied
consistently and correctly, thereby helping to ensure a smooth
resolution of Clearing Member defaults. This in turn should help to
ensure that LCH SA continues to operate as normal after a Clearing
Member default, and thus should promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of transactions. Moreover, in amending
Regulation 6 of the Clearing Regulations to implement CFTC Letter No.
19-17, the proposed rule change should allow LCH SA's Clearing Members
that are FCMs to take advantage of that relief, thereby promoting the
use of LCH SA's clearing services among such members and the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of derivative transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, for the reasons discussed above, the Commission finds
that the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Consistency With Rule 17Ad-22(e)(1)

    Rule 17Ad-22(e)(1) requires that LCH SA establish, implement,
maintain and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably
designed to provide for a well-founded, clear, transparent, and
enforceable legal basis for each aspect of its activities in all
relevant jurisdictions.\25\ The Commission believes the changes
discussed above permitting LCH SA's Clearing Members to submit for
clearing SBS on behalf of their U.S. clients would establish a well-
founded, clear, transparent, and enforceable legal basis for such
client clearing services. In particular, removing current provisions
from the Rule Book that prohibit Clearing Members from offering
clearing services to U.S. clients with respect to SBS and removing
provisions from the Procedures that prohibit LCH SA from accepting SBS
transactions in respect of U.S. clients, would help ensure that the
legal basis for providing clearing to U.S. clients with respect to SBS
is well-founded. Establishing the account structure to be used by
Clearing Members clearing SBS on behalf of U.S. clients and requiring
that Clearing Members and LCH SA establish accounts for holding and
transferring cash and other collateral on behalf of SBS Customers
likewise would help ensure that the methods for holding and
transferring such collateral are clear and transparent. Amending
Appendix 1 of the Rule Book to apply the CDS Default Management Process
to SBS would help to ensure the enforceability of the CDS Default
Management Process with respect to SBS, while amending Regulation 3 and
Regulation 5 of the Clearing Regulations to clarify that the security
interest granted to LCH SA applies to FCM/BD Clearing Members and the
LCH SBS Client Segregated Depository Account, and that no collateral
deposited in the LCH SBS Client Segregated Depository Account may be
applied on or in respect of payment or satisfaction of any of the FCM/
BD Clearing Member's liabilities to LCH SA, would help to ensure the
enforceability of LCH SA's security interest while protecting SBS
customer collateral. Finally, amending defined terms and provisions
throughout the Rule Book, Clearing Supplement, Procedures, and Clearing
Regulations to clarify that they apply to BDs and SBS would help to
ensure that the legal bases for applying these provisions to BDs and
SBS are similarly well-founded and clear.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that the other changes unrelated to U.S.
client clearing, as discussed in Part II.E above, would similarly help
to ensure that the legal basis for LCH SA's activities is well-founded
and clear. Amending Appendix 1 of the Rule Book to provide that each
Non-Defaulting Clearing Member would never be required to bid for more
than 100% of the relevant Auction Package and to remove a reference to
the Early Termination Trigger Date at the end of the paragraph would
correct drafting errors in clauses pertaining to the CDS Default
Management Process, thereby helping to ensure the clarity of the CDS
Default Management Process. Amending Regulation 6 of the Clearing
Regulations to implement CFTC Letter No. 19-17 should help clarify the
ability of Clearing Members that are FCMs to rely on the provisions of
such letter.
    Thus, the Commission finds that these aspects of the proposed rule
change are consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(1).\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Consistency With Rule 17Ad-22(e)(18)

    Rule 17Ad-22(e)(18) requires that LCH SA establish, implement,
maintain and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably
designed to establish objective, risk-based, and publicly disclosed
criteria for participation, which permit fair and open access by direct
and, where relevant, indirect participants and other financial market
utilities, require participants to have sufficient financial resources
and robust operational capacity to meet obligations arising from
participation in the clearing agency, and monitor compliance with such
participation requirements on an ongoing basis.\27\ As discussed above,
as part of the proposed changes permitting LCH SA's Clearing Members to
submit for clearing SBS on behalf of their U.S. clients, the proposed
rule change would impose certain requirements on Clearing Members who
wish to offer clearing to U.S. clients. Among other things, Clearing
Members would be required to establish accounts for holding and
transferring cash and other collateral on behalf of SBS Customers and
would be prohibited from offering clearing services to any U.S. Client,
other than an affiliate of the clearing member, with respect to swaps
and SBS, unless the Clearing Member (i) is an FCM or BD and (ii) has
provided LCH SA with an opinion of counsel confirming that the
provision of clearing services would not be contrary to applicable law.
The Commission believes these changes would establish objective, risk-
based, and publicly disclosed criteria for participation by LCH SA's
Clearing Members in client clearing for U.S. clients, which should
permit fair and open access by Clearing Members directly and U.S.
clients indirectly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Thus, the Commission finds that these aspects of the proposed rule
change are consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(18).\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act,
and in particular, with the requirements of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the
Act \29\ and Rules 17Ad-22(e)(1) and (e)(18).\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \30\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(1), (e)(18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act
\31\ that the proposed rule change (SR-LCH SA-2021-001), be, and hereby
is, approved.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \32\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-16232 Filed 7-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P