Appendix U Example Cost Calculation: 1999 Off site Disposal of Emission Control Dust ( K061) Shifting to On site Metals Recovery ( 2001 $) Pre Rule Cost CalculationPost Rule Cost Calculation Cost Inputs Total Quantity of Hazardous Waste Generated32,000 tons hazardous waste/ yrTotal Quantity of Hazardous Waste Generated( 32,000 tons hazardous waste/ yr)  ( 32,000 tons recovered waste/ yr)+ ( 32,000 tons recovered waste/ yr* 0.32 fraction as residuals * 0.95 fraction characteristically hazardous) = 9,728 tons hazardous waste/ yr ( recovered waste quantity no longer hazardous by definition) Generator StatusIf ( tons hazardous waste/ yr > 13.2 tons/ yr) then LQGGenerator StatusIf ( tons hazardous waste/ yr > 13.2 tons/ yr) then LQG Quantity of Waste Recovered On Site0 tons recovered waste/ yrQuantity of Waste Recovered On Site32,000 tons recovered waste/ yr Quantity of Waste Disposed Off Site ( Hazardous Landfill) 32,000 tons disposed waste/ yrQuantity of Waste Disposed Off Site ( Hazardous Landfill) 0 tons disposed waste/ yr Estimated Residual Quantity* 32% of recovered waste quantity will be residual ( 0.32) * ( 0 tons recovered waste/ yr) = 0 tons residual/ yrEstimated Residual Quantity32% of recovered waste quantity will be residual ( 0.32) * ( 32,000 tons recovered waste/ yr) = 10,240 tons residual/ yr Estimated Hazardous Residual Quantity* 95% residual is characteristically hazardous; ( 0.95) * ( 0 tons residual/ yr) = 0 tons hazardous residual/ yrEstimated Hazardous Residual Quantity95% residual is characteristically hazardous; ( 0.95) * ( 10,240 tons residual/ yr) = 9,728 tons hazardous residual/ yr Estimated Nonhazardous Residual Quantity* 5% residual is nonhazardous; ( 0.05) * ( 0 tons residual/ yr) = 0 tons nonhazardous residual/ yrEstimated Non hazardous Residual Quantity5% residual is nonhazardous; ( 0.05) * ( 10,240 tons residual/ yr) = 512 tons nonhazardous residual/ yr Estimated Recovered Product Quantity15% of recovered waste quantity will be recovered metal product ( 0.15) * ( 0 tons recovered waste) = 0 tons recovered metalEstimated Recovered Product Quantity15% of recovered waste quantity will be recovered metal product ( 0.15) * ( 32,000 tons recovered waste) = 4,800 tons recovered metal Number of Off site Hazardous Waste Residual Shipments per Year* 0 hazardous waste shipments per yearNumber of Off site Hazardous Waste Residual Shipments per YearGiven LQG and > 200 miles then maximum of ( 4 shipments or 9,728 tons recovery wastes/ 18 ton truck) = 540.4 hazardous waste shipments per year Number of Off Site Disposal Shipments per Year ( Hazardous Landfill) Given LQG and > 200 miles then maximum of ( 4 shipments or 32,000 tons disposal wastes/ 18 ton truck) = 1,777.8 disposal shipments per yearNumber of Off Site Disposal Shipments per Year ( Hazardous Landfill) 0 disposal shipments per year Number of Off site Nonhazardous Waste Residual Shipments per Year*( 0 tons nonhazardous residual/ 18 tons per truck) = 0 nonhazardous waste shipments per yearNumber of Off site Non Hazardous Waste Residual Shipments per Year( 512 tons nonhazardous residual/ 18 tons per truck) = 28.4 nonhazardous waste shipments per year Distance to Nearest Off site Hazardous Waste Landfill338 milesDistance to Nearest Off site Hazardous Waste Landfill338 miles Distance to Nearest Off site Non hazardous Waste Landfill50 milesDistance to Nearest Off site Non hazardous Waste Landfill50 miles Location of GeneratorOregonLocation of GeneratorOregon Cost Calculations ( costs are positive and revenues are negative) On site Metal Recovery Cost$ 1,933.5 * ( 0 tons recovered waste/ yr)^ 0.78 + $ 6,744.4 * ( 0 tons recovered waste/ yr)^ 0.59 + $ 23,685 = $ 0/ yrOn site Metal Recovery Cost$ 1,933.5 * ( 32,000 tons recovered waste/ yr)^ 0.78 + $ 6,744.4 * ( 32,000 tons recovered waste/ yr)^ 0.59 + $ 23,685 = $ 9,407,401/ yr Off site Waste Disposal ( Hazardous Waste Landfill) Given full truck loads ( greater than 60% full): ($ 153.42/ ton) * ( 32,000 tons waste per yr)= $ 4,909,440/ yrOff site Waste Disposal ( Hazardous Waste Landfill) ($ 153.42/ ton) * ( 0 tons waste per yr)= $ 0/ yr Residual Off site Hazardous Landfill Costmaximum( ($ 320/ ton) * ( 0 tons waste per yr) or ($ 2,246/ load) * ( 0 Hazardous Waste Shipments) )= $ 0/ yrResidual Off site Hazardous Landfill Costmaximum( ($ 320/ ton) * ( 9,728 tons waste per yr) or ($ 2,246/ load) * ( 540.4 Hazardous Waste Shipments) )= $ 3,112,960/ yr Residual Off site Non hazardous Landfill Cost($ 111/ ton) * ( 0 tons non hazardous residual per yr) = $ 0/ yrResidual Off site Non hazardous Landfill Cost($ 111/ ton) * ( 512 tons non hazardous residual per yr) = $ 56,832/ yr Waste Characterization Testing Cost($ 1,532/ load) * ( 1,777.8 Hazardous Loads + 0 Non Hazardous Load) = $ 2,723,590/ yrWaste Characterization Testing Cost($ 1,532/ load) * ( 540.4 Hazardous Loads + 28.4 Non Hazardous Load) = $ 871,402/ yr Manifesting Costs($ 236/ shipment) * ( 1,777.8 shipments/ yr) = $ 419,561/ yr Manifesting Costs($ 236/ shipment) * ( 540.4 hazardous shipments/ yr )+ ($ 89/ shipment) * ( 28.4 shipments/ yr) = $ 130,062/ yr Loading Costs($ 2.57/ ton) * ( 32,000 tons recovered waste) = $ 82,240/ yrLoading Costs($ 2.57/ ton) * ( 10,240 tons residual) = $ 26,317/ yr Residual Waste Transportation Costs($ 3.73/ mile)*( 0 hazardous waste shipments/ yr)*( 338 miles to hazardous landfill/ hazardous waste shipment) + ($ 2.16/ mile)*( 0 nonhazardous waste shipments/ yr)*( 50 miles to nonhazardous Landfill/ nonhazardous waste shipment) = $ 0/ yrResidual Waste Transportation Costs($ 3.73/ mile)*( 540.4 hazardous waste shipments/ yr)*( 338 miles to hazardous landfill/ hazardous waste shipment) + ($ 2.16/ mile)*( 28.4 nonhazardous waste shipments/ yr)*( 50 miles to nonhazardous Landfill/ nonhazardous waste shipment) = $ 684,371/ yr Disposal Waste Transportation Cost($ 3.73/ mile)*( 1,777.8 hazardous waste shipments/ yr)*( 338 miles to hazardous landfill/ hazardous waste shipment) = $ 2,241,343/ yrDisposal Waste Transportation Cost($ 3.73/ mile)*( 0 hazardous waste shipments/ yr)*( 338 miles to hazardous landfill/ hazardous waste shipment) = $ 0/ yr Salvage ( Recovered Product) Value($ 643/ ton metal) * ( 0 tons recovered metal/ yr) = $ 0/ yrSalvage ( Recovered Product) Value($ 643/ ton metal) * ( 4,800 recovered metal/ yr) = $ 3,086,400/ yr Hazardous Material Training CostGiven LQG then $ 9,794/ yrHazardous Material Training CostGiven LQG then $ 9,794/ yr Manifest Training CostGiven LQG then $ 1,828/ yrManifest Training CostGiven LQG then $ 1,828/ yr Biennial Report/ General Administrative Duties CostGiven LQG then $ 2,430/ yrBiennial Report/ General Administrative Duties CostGiven LQG then $ 2,430/ yr Contingency Planning CostGiven LQG then $ 2,796Contingency Planning CostGiven LQG then $ 2,796 Initial Waste Characterization Cost$ 6,160Initial Waste Characterization Cost$ 6,160 Exclusion Filing Fee ( One time Expenditure)$ 0Exclusion Filing Fee ( One time Expenditure)$ 639 State Facility Tax/ FeeGiven Oregon and LQG then: $ 525 activity verification fee/ yrState Facility Tax/ FeeGiven Oregon and LQG then: $ 525 activity verification fee/ yr State Generation Tax/ FeeGiven Oregon then: ($ 45 generation fee/ ton) * ( 32,000 tons disposed waste/ yr) = $ 1,440,000/ yrState Generation Tax/ FeeGiven Oregon then: ($ 45 generation fee/ ton) * ( 9,728 tons residual/ yr) = $ 437,360/ yr Total$ 11,839,707/ yr$ 11,664,477/ yr Incremental Costs$ 175,230/ yr * Residual costs are included in the cost for off site commercial treatment and disposal Appendix V Example Cost Calculation: 1999 Off site Disposal of Spent Aluminum Potliner ( K088) shifting to On site Sodium Fluoride Recovery ( 2001 $) Pre Rule Cost CalculationPost Rule Cost Calculation Cost Inputs Total Quantity of Hazardous Waste Generated360 tons hazardous waste/ yrTotal Quantity of Hazardous Waste Generated( 360 tons hazardous waste/ yr)  ( 360 tons recovered waste/ yr)+ ( 360 tons recovered waste/ yr* 0.32 fraction as residuals * 0 fraction characteristically hazardous) = 0 tons hazardous waste/ yr ( recovered waste quantity no longer hazardous by definition) Generator StatusIf ( tons hazardous waste/ yr > 13.2 tons/ yr) then LQGGenerator StatusIf ( 1.3 tons/ yr > tons hazardous waste/ yr) then CESQG ( Not a Generator) Quantity of Waste Recovered On Site0 tons recovered waste/ yrQuantity of Waste Recovered On Site360 tons recovered waste/ yr Quantity of Waste Disposed Off Site360 tons recovered waste/ yrQuantity of Waste Disposed Off Site0 tons recovered waste/ yr Estimated Residual Quantity* 33% of recovered waste quantity will be residual ( 0) * ( 0 tons recovered waste/ yr) = 0 tons residual/ yrEstimated Residual Quantity32% of recovered waste quantity will be residual ( 0.32) * ( 360 tons recovered waste/ yr) = 119 tons residual/ yr Estimated Hazardous Residual Quantity* 100% residual is Listed hazardous; ( 1.00) * ( 0 tons residual/ yr) = 0 tons hazardous residual/ yrEstimated Hazardous Residual Quantity0% residual is characteristically hazardous; ( 0) * ( 119 tons residual/ yr) = 0 tons hazardous residual/ yr Estimated Nonhazardous Residual Quantity* 0% residual is nonhazardous; ( 0) * ( 0 tons residual/ yr) = 0 tons nonhazardous residual/ yrEstimated Non hazardous Residual Quantity100% residual is nonhazardous; ( 1.0) * ( 119 tons residual/ yr) = 119 tons nonhazardous residual/ yr Estimated Recovered Product Quantity2% of recovered waste quantity will be recovered sodium fluoride product ( 0.02) * ( 0 tons recovered waste) = 0 tons recovered sodium fluorideEstimated Recovered Product Quantity2% of recovered waste quantity will be recovered sodium fluoride product ( 0.02) * ( 360 tons recovered waste) = 7.2 tons recovered sodium fluoride Number of Off site Hazardous Waste Residual Shipments per Year* 0 hazardous waste shipments per yearNumber of Off site Hazardous Waste Residual Shipments per Year0 hazardous waste shipments per year Number of Off Site Disposal Shipments per YearGiven LQG and > 200 miles then maximum of ( 4 shipments or 360 tons recovery wastes/ 18 ton truck) = 20 recovery shipments per yearNumber of Off Site Recovery Shipments per Year0 recovery shipments per year Number of Off site Nonhazardous Waste Residual Shipments per Year*( 0 tons nonhazardous residual/ 18 tons per truck) = 0 nonhazardous waste shipments per yearNumber of Off site Non Hazardous Waste Residual Shipments per Year( 119 tons nonhazardous residual/ 18 tons per truck) = 6.6 nonhazardous waste shipments per year Distance to Nearest Off site Hazardous Waste Incineration Facility1000 milesDistance to Nearest Off site Hazardous Waste Incineration Facility1000 miles Distance to Nearest Off site Non hazardous Waste Landfill50 milesDistance to Nearest Off site Non hazardous Waste Landfill50 miles Location of GeneratorOregonLocation of GeneratorOregon Cost Calculations ( costs are positive and revenues are negative) On site Sodium Fluoride Recovery Cost($ 465/ ton) * ( 0 tons recovered waste/ yr)^ 0.9 + ($ 4,136/ ton) * ( 0 tons recovered waste/ yr)^ 0.6 $ 53,603 = $ 0/ yrOn site Sodium Fluoride Recovery Cost($ 465/ ton) * ( 360 tons recovered waste/ yr)^ 0.9 + ($ 4,136/ ton) * ( 360 tons recovered waste/ yr)^ 0.6 $ 53,603 = $ 287,898/ yr Off site Incineration Cost($ 551.5/ ton) * ( 360 tons incinerated waste/ yr) = $ 198,551/ yrOff site Incineration Cost Given small loads ( less than 60% of a full 18 ton load): ($ 170/ ton + $ 25.50/ ton surcharge) * ( 0 tons incinerated waste/ yr) = $ 0/ yr Residual Off site Hazardous Landfill Cost ($ 320/ ton) * ( 0 tons hazardous residual per yr) = $ 0/ yrResidual Off site Hazardous Landfill Cost ($ 320/ ton) * ( 0 tons hazardous residual per yr) = $ 0/ yr Residual Off site Non hazardous Landfill Cost($ 111/ ton) * ( 0 tons non hazardous residual per yr) = $ 0/ yrResidual Off site Non hazardous Landfill Cost($ 111/ ton) * ( 119 tons non hazardous residual per yr) = $ 13,209/ yr Waste Characterization Testing Cost($ 1,410/ load) * ( 20 Hazardous Loads + 0 Non Hazardous Load) = $ 28,200/ yrWaste Characterization Testing Cost($ 1,410/ load) * ( 0 Hazardous Loads + 6.6 Non Hazardous Load) = $ 9,306/ yr Manifesting Costs($ 236/ shipment) * ( 20 shipments/ yr) = $ 4,720/ yr Manifesting Costs($ 89/ shipment) * ( 6.6 shipments/ yr) = $ 587/ yr Loading Costs($ 2.57/ ton) * ( 360 tons recovered waste) = $ 925/ yrLoading Costs($ 2.57/ ton) * ( 119 tons residual) = $ 306/ yr Residual Waste Transportation Costs($ 3.73/ mile)*( 0 hazardous waste shipments/ yr)*( 1,000 miles to hazardous incineration/ hazardous waste shipment) + ($ 2.16/ mile)*( 0 nonhazardous waste shipments/ yr)*( 50 miles to nonhazardous landfill/ nonhazardous waste shipment) = $ 0/ yrTransportation Costs($ 3.73/ mile)*( 0 hazardous waste shipments/ yr)*( 1,000 miles to hazardous incineration/ hazardous waste shipment) + ($ 2.16/ mile)*( 6.6 nonhazardous waste shipments/ yr)*( 50 miles to nonhazardous landfill/ nonhazardous waste shipment) = $ 713/ yr Disposed Waste Transportation Cost($ 3.73/ mile) * ( 20 hazardous waste shipments/ yr)*( 1,000 miles to hazardous incineration/ hazardous waste shipment) = $ 74,600/ yrDisposed Waste Transportation Cost($ 3.73/ mile) * ( 0 hazardous waste shipments/ yr)*( 1,000 miles to hazardous incineration/ hazardous waste shipment) = $ 0/ yr Salvage ( Recovered Product) Value($ 1,240/ ton sodium fluoride) * ( 0 tons recovered acid/ yr) = $ 0/ yrSalvage ( Recovered Product) Value($ 1,240/ ton sodium fluoride) * ( 7.2 tons recovered acid/ yr) = $ 8,928/ yr Hazardous Material Training CostGiven LQG then $ 9,794/ yrHazardous Material Training CostGiven Not a Generator then $ 0/ yr Manifest Training CostGiven LQG then $ 1,828/ yrManifest Training CostGiven Not a Generator then $ 0/ yr Biennial Report/ General Administrative Duties CostGiven LQG then $ 2,430/ yrBiennial Report/ General Administrative Duties CostGiven Not a Generator then $ 0/ yr Contingency Planning CostGiven LQG then $ 2,796Contingency Planning CostGiven Not a Generator then $ 0 Initial Waste Characterization Cost$ 6,160Initial Waste Characterization Cost$ 6,160 Exclusion Filing Fee ( One time Expenditure)$ 0Exclusion Filing Fee ( One time Expenditure)$ 639 State Facility Tax/ FeeGiven Oregon and LQG then: $ 525 activity verification fee/ yrState Facility Tax/ FeeGiven Oregon and Not a Generator then: $ 0 activity verification fee/ yr State Generation Tax/ FeeGiven Oregon then: ($ 45 generation fee/ ton)*( 360 tons recovered waste/ yr) = $ 16,200/ yrState Generation Tax/ FeeGiven Oregon then: ($ 45 generation fee/ ton)*( 0 tons residual/ yr) = $ 0/ yr Total$ 346,728/ yr$ 308,842/ yr Incremental Costs $ 37,887/ yr * Residual costs are included in the costs for off site commercial incineration. Appendix W Methodology for Estimating Residual Generation and Management This appendix presents the methodology used regarding metal, solvent, and acid recovery residual generation and disposal.

Using 1999 BRS data, facilities reporting waste management with system types M013, M021, and M031 were reviewed. Due to the limited number of facilities reporting wastes managed with system types M013 and M031, all such facilities were reviewed. Facilities reporting management by system type M021 were divided into 5 groups, approximately equal in number, based on the mass of waste managed by system type M021. Six facilities were selected from each group. The groups were divided as follows: less than 1.1 tons managed, 1.1 to 5 tons managed, 5 to 13.5 tons managed, 13.5 to 55 tons managed, and greater than 55 tons managed. The tables below present the data results.

The following assumptions were made regarding the recovery processes:

° Reclamation systems for acid and solvents are closed loop. That is no losses from spillage or waste are assumed. This is a simplification of the actual process as many processes may include settlement tanks or other open air sections that may allow evaporation or spillage.

° All ineffective products are removed with the process residuals. An effectiveness factor or assay value is included to estimate the " purity" of the recovered solvent, acid, or metal.

° Mass is assumed to be balanced in the acid and solvent recovery process. No additives or precipitants are assumed into the process, or the change in product/ residual mass in comparison to the total mass is minor. The recovery of metals process, 68 percent of the waste stream mass is assumed to contain the product metals and components that are volatilized ( e. g., water vapor). Twenty ( 20) percent of the waste stream is assumed recovered as metals in higher quality wastes and five percent in lower quality wastes. Thirty two ( 32) percent is assumed to be residual waste. The mass recovery of products is discussed further below.

Metals Recovery Statistics No. Data Points7 Range0.42 to 84 percent Average32 percent Standard Deviation33.92 percent DPRA reviewed a total of 19 facilities reporting wastes managed by M013 in the 1999 BRS. One additional facility, for a total of seven facilities, was able to be used in a percent residual assumption. Residual waste streams could not be identified in the remaining facilities. The management system type reported for the residuals identified from M013 system processes are M061, M111, M112, M119, and M132. Five of seven waste generating facilities managed the M013 residuals by stabilization ( M111, M112, and M119). The likely final deposition of the stabilized wastes are in a RCRA Subtitle C hazardous waste landfill.

Solvent Recovery Statistics No. Data Points23 Range0.46 to 140 percent Average33 percent Standard Deviation32.13 percent Residuals generated by M021 system processes were reported managed by the following system types; M042, M051, M061, and M081. An total of 28 facilities were reviewed, of which 5 facility residual waste streams could not be identified. Fuel blending ( M061) was reported by 17 of 22 facilities for management of M021 residuals. An additional three facilities managed M021 residuals by other co burning or incineration systems ( M042 and M051).

Acid Recovery Statistics No. Data Points18 Range0 to 105 percent Average26 percent Standard Deviation31.92 percent Residuals generated by M031 system processes were assumed to be similar in form to the spent acid waste stream. That is, the contaminants ( generally metals) were concentrated in a smaller portion of the waste stream for management. The disposal quantities of these residuals were identified by their description and management system type. An total of 23 facilities were reviewed, of which 5 facility residual waste streams could not be identified. Residuals were reported managed by M039, M042, M043, M051, M077, M104, M109, M121, M134, M136. Chemical precipitation ( M077) was reported by seven of eighteen facilities for management of M031 residuals. One additional facility reported management by neutralization only ( M121), which is similar to chemical precipitation.

The analysis should use the average residual generation values listed above. Metal recovery residuals will be managed by stabilization and Subtitle C landfill. Solvent residuals are managed by energy recovery. Acid recovery residuals are managed by chemical precipitation. Cost assumptions for management of acid recovery residuals will include stabilization and landfill disposal of precipitates, and sewer discharge of neutralized wastewater. Appendix X Analysis of Metals Containing and Organic Liquid Disposal Quantities This appendix presents the review of selected metals containing liquids and organic liquids waste streams to determine the potential for or quantity of mis categorized disposed waste streams. Disposed wastes streams 1999 BRS data was reviewed for the final disposition in the case of metals containing liquids and the description in the case of organic liquids. Metals containing liquids may be classified as disposed based on the reported 1999 Biennial Report management methods, but the waste may be managed further and metals content recovered. The final disposal/ management method may not be reflected in the reporting by the disposing facility. For example, metals containing liquids reported managed by chemical precipitation ( M077) may be disposed in a landfill or shipped to a high temperature metals recovery facility. In which case, the waste streams should be classified as recovered off site outside the same NAICs. For organic liquid wastes disposed, the facility may recover solvents on site and produce a waste stream with a similar form as spent solvents. The screening process for the 1999 BRS data did not differentiate between solvent recovery residuals and spent solvents. A review of the wastes descriptions was conducted to determine if the organic liquid wastestreams were the result of onsite recovery and should be excluded from the analysis. Examples of wastes that should be removed from the analysis include still bottoms, distillation fractions, column bottoms. Other wastes streams with descriptions indicating a recovery process was employed were also flagged to be removed.

DPRA reviewed a total of 10 metals containing liquids generating facilities, representing $ 1.9 million of a total of $ 2.9 million in incremental cost savings without taxes ( 66 percent). Three facilities were identified that generate 3,621.5 tons of metals containing liquid waste streams with which the metals are ultimately recovered. The recovery facilities represent a total of $ 0.56 million of the incremental costs savings without taxes, 29 percent of the reviewed facilities and 19 percent of the total incremental cost savings without taxes.

DPRA reviewed a total of 35 organic liquids generating facilities, representing $ 87.9 million of a total of $ 174.4 million in incremental cost savings without taxes ( 50 percent). Eight facilities were identified that generate 10,610 tons of organic liquid waste streams of which the description indicates them to be solvent recovery residuals. These facilities represent a total of $ 23.9 million of the incremental costs savings without taxes, 27 percent of the reviewed facilities and 14 percent of the total incremental cost savings without taxes. The waste streams identified represent only a portion of the organic liquids generated at seven of the eight facilities; therefore, the identified wastes streams account for less than the facility totals of $ 23.9 million incremental costs savings without taxes. DPRA estimates the waste streams represent 53 percent of the eight facilities incremental cost savings without taxes ($ 46.6 million). Metals Containing Liquids Generating Facilities Reviewed for Potential Metal Recovery Ultimate Disposal Generator EPA ID Total Offsite Shipped Quantity ( tons) Offsite Shipped Quantity ( tons) Management Method Receiver EPA ID Receiver Name (

Secondary Receiver Name) Management Method for Precipitated Sludges Conclusions NYD002241982 1773.4 169.9 Stabilization ( M077) PAD010154045 Envirite of Pennsylvania Inc. Stabilization/ chemical fixation ( M111) Stabilization/ chemical fixation  likely landfilled 1603.5 Chemical precipitation in combination with biological treatment ( M091) NJD002385730 Dupont Chambers Works ( Unable to find related waste stream)

ILD984774513 1233.1 1233.1 Chemical precipitation ( M077) ILD062480850

TXR000000034 Phibro Tech Inc

ECS Refining Texas LLC No 1999 Biennial Report data for TXR000000034 WID000711077 1315.2 1315.2 Stabilization/ chemical fixation ( M111) IND093219012 Heritage Environmental Svc  Indy Landfill ( M132) Landfilled MND980680540 1514.5 1514.5 Chemical precipitation/ other aqueous inorganic treatment ( M077/ M078) MND981098478 US Filter Recovery Services Inc High temperature metals recovery ( M011)

Remove facility from off site disposal scenario to off site recovery scenario.

AZD980818330 1105.3 1105.3 Chemical oxidation followed by chemical precipitation ( M074) CAD008488025 Phibro Tech Inc Other metals recovery for reuse ( M014) Remove facility from offsite disposal scenario to off site recovery scenario.

NOTE: WR form says M014, not M074 ILD067464875 1332.9 1288.6 Chemical precipitation ( M077) ILD000666206

( onsite M112)

MID000724831 Envirite of Illinois Inc. Stabilization/ chemical fixation ( M111) Stabilization/ chemical fixation  likely landfilled  NOTE: GM form says M112, not M077 33.3 Transfer facility storage ( M141) ILD980502744 Safety Kleen Corp ( Unable to find related waste stream)

11.0 Chemical precipitation ( M077) ILD062480850

TXR000000034 Phibro Tech Inc

ECS Refining Texas LLC No 1999 Biennial Report data for TXR000000034 ILD984809905 760.9 760.9 Chemical precipitation ( M077) ILD000666206

( onsite M112)

MID000724831 Envirite of Illinois Inc. Stabilization/ chemical fixation ( M111) Stabilization/ chemical fixation  likely landfilled  NOTE: GM form says M112, not M077 ILD155126030 687.3 687.3 Chemical precipitation ( M077) ILD000666206

( onsite M112)

MID000724831 Envirite of Illinois Inc. Stabilization/ chemical fixation ( M111) Stabilization/ chemical fixation  likely landfilled  NOTE: GM form says M112, not M077 MND001037639 1001.8 1001.5 Chemical precipitation/ other aqueous inorganic treatment ( M077/ M078) MND981098478 US Filter Recovery Services Inc High temperature metals recovery ( M011)

Remove facility from off site disposal scenario to off site recovery scenario.

0.2 Chemical precipitation ( M077) MND980996805

MND981098478 Enviro Chem Inc

US Filter Recovery Services Inc High temperature metals recovery ( M011) Remove facility from off site disposal scenario to off site recovery scenario.

ILD984844134 601.3 601.3 Chemical precipitation ( M077) ILD000666206

( onsite M112)

MID000724831 Envirite of Illinois Inc. Stabilization/ chemical fixation ( M111) Stabilization/ chemical fixation  likely landfilled  NOTE: GM form says M112, not M077 Organic Liquids Generating Facilities Reviewed for Potential to be Solvent Recovery Residuals Generator EPA ID Total Offsite Shipped Quantity ( tons) Offsite Shipped Quantity ( tons) Waste Description Other Info Conclusions NJD002146504 3,760.6 0.1 WASTE PETROLEUM NAPTHA, COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID, FROM PARTS DEGREASING 3,760.5 FLAMMABLE LIQUID FROM PRODUCTION OR SUNSCREENS WID000808824 3,676.5 3,657.5 ( no waste description) F005, A34, B203 19.0 ( no waste description) F005, A37, B203 WIR000046276 3,263.2 14.8 ( no waste description) F003, A09, B203 3,248.4 ( no waste description) D001, A09, B203 0.1 ( no waste description) D038, A59, B203 0.1 ( no waste description) D006, A19, B203 0.2 ( no waste description) U122, A58, B219 TXD980626014 3,224.0 1,711.7 STYRENE WASTE OIL. THIS WASTE CONSISTS OF BENZENE, TOLUENE,

534.8 SPENT XYLENE. THE WASTE IS A SPENT XYLENE SOLVENT. IT IS A 1.8 FLAMMABLE ORGANIC LIQUIDS. THE WASTE CONSISTS OF ORGANIC LI 5.7 PAINT WASTE, LIQUID 954.2 NON AQUEOUS LIQUID, TYPICALLY AS FOLLOWSHEPTANE ISOMERS 48%,

2.2 ANTIOXIDANT. THE WASTE IS A CLEAR LIGHT YELLOW LIQUID WITH 13.6 PARTS WASHER SOLVENT IAD005272398 2,830.7 17.2 DUPONT WASTE CODE = WFW 1 OBSOLETE NON SALEABLE PAINT AND PA INT RELATED MATERIAL, ORGANIC LIQUID, FUELS BLENDING FOR CEM ENT KILN 1,737.0 DUPONT WASTE CODE = WOM 0; MIXED WASTE PAINT AND PAINT RELAT ED MATERIALS, ORGANIC LIQUIDS, TFE STILL BOTTOMS, FUELS FOR CEMENT KILN AND INCINERATION Already a distillation by product 1,076.6 DUPONT WASTE CODE = WOM 16; OCPSF PROCESS WASTEWATER, RESIN WATER OF REACTION, LOW SOLIDS LIQUID, SHIPPED OFF SITE FOR BIOLOGICAL WATER TREATMENT WVD004325353 3,228.7 3,188.2 IGNITABLE, LISTED WASTE SOLVENTS FROM PROCESS EQUIPMENT CLEA NUP; CONTAINS TOLUENE, METHANOL, ISOPROPANOL, ETHANOL AND SO LVENT 140. 0.1 IGNITABLE OFF SPEC RAW MATERIAL, ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL.

1.6 IGNITABLE OFF SPEC ORGANOFUNCTIONAL SILANE PRODUCT.

2.9 IGNITABLE, SILOXANE DISTILLATION/ STRIPPING WASTE FROM PRODUC T MANUFACTURING. Already a distillation by product 8.1 CORROSIVE OFF SPEC RAW MATERIAL, POLYOXYALKYLENE BUTYL EHTER PHOSPHATE.

0.7 IGNITABLE, SILOXANE DISTILLATION/ STRIPPING RESIDUE FROM PROD UCT MANUFACTURING CONTAINING ETHANOL. Already a distillation by product 0.8 IGNITABLE WASTE FROM PROCESS EQUIPMENT CLEANUP WITH ETHANOL.

0.1 IGNITABLE, LISTED OFF SPEC RAW MATERIAL, METHYLENE CHLORIDE.

0.2 LISTED OFF SPEC RAW MATERIAL, TETRAHYDROFURAN.

0.2 IGNITABLE, LISTED WASTE SOLVENTS FROM PROCESS EQUIPMENT CLEA NUP CONTAINING TOLUENE AND METHANOL.

0.4 IGNITABLE OFF SPEC RAW MATERIAL, DICYCLOPENTADIENE. 1.2 IGNITABLE, SILOXANE DISTILLATION/ STRIPPING RESIDUE FROM PROD UCT MANUFACTURING. Already a distillation by product 1.3 IGNITABLE OFF SPEC RAW MATERIAL, ETHYLENE GLYCOL.

2.6 IGNITABLE, LISTED PAINT SOLVENTS FROM MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS .

20.3 IGNITABLE, LISTED WASTE SOLVENTS AND OFF SPEC SURFACTANTS.

NJD981080401 2,682.7 2,682.7 DISTILLATION FRACTIONS & STILL BOTTOMS AND SOLVENTS USED Already a distillation by product TXD000461533 2,944.3 13.3 PAINT RELATED WASTE CONSISTS OF PAINT, PAINT THINNER, PAINT 597.0 ORGANIC ACID RESIDUES GENERATED DURING PRODUCTION OF ORGANIC 70.7 SPENT ACETONE/ MSO WASTE GENERATED AT OLEFINS UNIT FROM ACETY 982.1 VINYL ACETATE POLYMER IS VISCOUS ORGANIC LIQUID MATERIAL RES 928.3 " A" DRIPOLENE IS STILL BOTTOMS GENERATED AS PART OF OLEFINS Already a distillation by product 6.4 SPENT SOLVENTS, HALOGENATED & NON HALOGENATED ORGANIC CHEMIC 0.2 METHANOL SYNOSOL WATER RESULTING FROM MIXTURE OF METHANOL, S 346.2 MIXED VARNISH WASTE IS VISCOUS LIQUID ORGANIC MATERIAL RESUL ARD052528809 2,876.3 19.2 TANK CLEANOUT, ONE TIME. ( 15) FLAMMABLE. CONTAINS TOLUENE. ( 13292)

0.7 MIXED LAB WASTES. ( LAB) FLAMMABLE, TOXIC. CONTAINS ACETONE, METHANOL. ( 12654)

1.8 MIXED LAB WASTES. ( LAB) FLAMMABLE, TOXIC. CONTAINS ACETONE, BENZENE. ( 9433)

5.0 MIXED LAB WASTES. ( LAB) FLAMMABLE, TOXIC. CONTAINS ACETONE, DICHLOROMETHANE. ( 9276)

695.5 SPENT DISTILLATION CHASER FLUID, WASTE OIL. ( DE) FLAMMABLE. ( CP1374) Already a distillation by product 0.6 DISTILLATION COLUMN BOTTOMS AND OVERHEADS. ( AD) FLAMMABLE. ( 9345) Already a distillation by product 2,145.1 DISTILLATION BY PRODUCT FROM PRODUCTION. ( AD  PCO) FLAMMAB LE. ( 9710 06333) Already a distillation by product 1.7 PAINT WASTE. ( MAINT) TOXIC, FLAMMABLE. CONTAINS TOLUENE, XYL ENE. ( 9278)

6.6 TANK CLEANOUT, ONE TIME. ( AD) FLAMMABLE. CONTAINS ADMA. ( 137 72)

TXD008092793 2,451.1 2,404.5 MISCELLANEOUS ORGANIC LIQUIDS 46.6 HAZARDOUS NON HALOGENATED SOLVENTS PRD090036021 2,589.0 60.7 AQUEOUS PHASE FROM PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING PROCESS.

1,968.6 IGNITABLE SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURE FROM PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACT URING PROCESS; MIXTURE OF TOLUENE, ACETONE, ETHYL ACETATE, M ETHYLENE CHLORIDE,

METHANOL, XYLENE, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE 5.8 DISCARDED SPENT HALOGENATED & NON HALOGENATED SOLVENTS 535.5 IGNITABLE SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURE FROM PHARMACEUTICAL PROCESS; ACETONE, METHANOL, ETHYL ACETATE AND METHYLENE CHLORIDE.

14.2 DISCARDED FLAMMABLE WASTE FROM PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURINGP ROCESS 4.2 OFF SPEC DISCARDED INTERMEDIATE ORGANIC LIQUIDS OHD076796887 2,766.8 155.1 DRUM LIQUIDS FROM RESIN MANUFACTURING 0.1 2K CLEARCOAT AND KILLED ISOCYANATE WASTE 0.2 AGED RAW MATERIAL: DIMETHYLETHANOLAMINE 5.3 AGED RAW MATERIAL: PHENOTIC RESIN SOLUTION 20.8 CLEANING SOLVENT BLEND USED IN RESIN MANUFACTURING 19.7 OFF SPEC WATERBASED RESIN 2.4 WASTE MONOMER MIX FROM LABORATORY TESTING 293.3 OFF SPEC SOLVENT BASED RESINS 70.9 WASTE TOLUENE AND METHYL CARBANATE SOLUTION 2,198.7 FLAMMABLE LIQUID DISTILLATE FROM RESIN MANUFACTURING Already a distillation by product 0.4 KARL FISCHER REAGENT FROM LABORATORY TESTING VAD000019828 2,236.6 PAINT MANUFACTURER HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLVENT NJD002191211 2,283.3 15.9 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 0.2 WASTE SOLVENTS 2,267.2 BULK SOLVENTS BUILDING 30 IAD045372836 2,432.7 1,047.9 BENZENE CONTAINING PYROLYSIS OIL FROM ETHYLENE PRODUCTION: MIXTURE OF ORGANIC COMPONENTS.

1,354.5 IGNITABLE SPENT SOLVENT AND CO MONOMER FROM LOW DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PRODUCTION: MIXTURE OF MINERAL SPIRITS AND VINYL ACETATE.

28.0 IGNITABLE SPENT SOLVENT AND CO MONOMER FROM LOW DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PRODUCTION: MIXTURE OF MINERAL SPIRITS AND METHYL ACRYLATE.

0.2 IGNITABLE SPENT SOLVENT FROM OPERATIONAL CLEANOUT: MIXTURE OF ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS.

0.2 IGNITABLE SPENT SOLVENTS FROM QUALITY CONTROL LABORATORY OPERATIONS: MIXTURE OF SOLVENTS, WITH MAIN COMPONENTS BEING CYCLOHEXANE AND TETRACHLOROETHENE.

1.2 WASTE PAINT MATERIALS AND MIXTURE OF VARIOUS OIL BASED PAINTS.

0.7 IGNITABLE SPENT SOLVENTS FROM QUALITY CONTROL LABORATORY OPERATIONS: MIXTURE OF SOLVENTS, WITH MAIN COMPONENTS BEING CYCLOHEXANE AND TETRACHLOROETHENE.

TXD008090011 2,212.8 2,212.0 BY PRODUCT ORGANICS FROM MERCAPTAN MANUFACTURING. TOWER BOT 0.8 WASTE PAINT THINNER AND PAINT COLLECTED IN 55 GALLON DRUMS TXR000025809 2,670.4 0.4 PAINT THINNER OR PETROLEUM DISTILLATES Already a distillation by product 26.6 POLYETHYLENE AND POLYVINYLACETATE WAX IN VINYL ACETATE FRO 2,319.1 RECOVERED ORGANICS  SPENT CONTAMINATED LUBRICATING OILS, MI 11.8 SPENT PARTS WASHER SOLVENT 29.5 HEAVY AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS ( ETHYLENE TARS)

15.2 POLYETHYLENE ADDITIVE SLURRY ( AMINES, ANTIOXIDENTS & AMIDE 4.4 WASTE PAINT RELATED RESIDUES, EXCESS PAINT AND APPLICATOR 17.7 SPENT CYCLOHEXANE WASH SOLUTION 197.0 SPENT METHANOL USED IN CLEANING PROCESS VESSELS 21.9 RECOVERED, SPENT ORGANIC PEROXIDE IN MINERAL SPIRITS 2.5 OLD/ CONTAMINATED FUEL 0.2 USED N PROPANOL PUMP SEAL FLUIDS 24.2 SPENT LABORATORY SOLVENT WITH ANALYTICAL RESIDUES MOD985791995 2,158.5 1,437.9 IGNITABLE SPENT SOLVENT FROM PHARMACEUTICAL MFG PROCESS  MI XTURE OF METHANOL AND TOLUENE 485.6 SPENT SOLVENT FROM PHARMACEUTICAL MFG PROCESS SOLUTION OF ME THYLENE CHLORIDE AND WATER WITH ACETONE 234.9 IGNITABLE SPENT SOLVENT FROM PHARMACEUTICAL MFG. PROCESS TOL UENE KYD082390394 2,002.0 459.5 IGNITABLE, BARIUM, CHROMIUM, LEAD 1,542.5 IGNITABLE, LEAD, BARIUM, MEK, TOLUENE MAD980912323 2,947.1 1,111.0 TOXIC IGNITABLE SOLVENT ( ACETONE, TOLUENE, BUTANOL, XYLENE) GENERATED FROM ORGANIC CHEMICAL FILTERING PROCESSING AND EQUIPMENT CLEANING. 3.6 DISTILLATION STILLBOTTOMS AND SPENT SOLVENT. CONTAINS METHYLENE CHLORIDE AND ANILINE. Already a distillation by product 566.1 TOXIC IGNITABLE AQUEOUS SOLUTION CONTAINS ( ACETONE, TOLUENE, BUTANOL, METHANOL, CHLOROBENZENE) GENERATED FROM SITE AIR ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT,

WASTEWATER CONTROL EQUIPMENT, PRODUCT FILTERING AND EQUIPMENT CLEANOUTS.

783.5 TOXIC IGNITABLE AQUEOUS SOLUTION CONTAINS ( ACETONE, TOLUENE, BUTANOL, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, METHANOL) GENERATED FROM SITE AIR ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT, WASTEWATER CONTROL EQUIPMENT, PRODUCT FILTERING AND EQUIPMENT CLEANOUTS.

48.9 IGNITABLE SOLVENT SOLUTION, BUTANOL CONTAMINATED WITH ETHYL ACETATE.

150.1 IGNITABLE AQUEOUS SOLUTION, CONTAINS ISOPROPANOL GENERATED FROM PRODUCT FILTERING.

20.0 WASTE SOLVENTS FROM DRYER CONDENSATE AND CAPTURED VENT OVERHEADS.( BUTANOL, ACETONE, ISOPROPANOL, CYCLOHEXANE) GENERATED FROM ORGANIC CHEMICAL DRYING. 8.7 SPENT INPROCESS SOLVENT WASTE, ( METHANOL, TOLUENE, XYLENE, ISOPROPANOL, ETHYL ACETATE) GENERATED FROM ORGANIC CHEMICAL MANUFACTURE.

0.5 WASTE METHYLENE CHLORIDE AND ISOPROPANOL. GENERATED FROM ORGANIC CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING.

0.8 LABORATORY SOLVENT WASTE. GENERATED IN QUALITY AND RESEARCH LABORTORIES.

9.4 WASTE SOLVENTS FROM CONTAMINATED REACTION. ( BUTANOL, ETHYL ACETATE) GENERATED WHEN INPROCESS REACTION BECAME CONTAMINATED WITH ETHYL ACETATE. 0.8 SPENT IGNITABLE, CORROSIVE SOLVENT USED IN VESSEL CLEANING ( ACETONE, HYDROCHLORIC ACID) GENERATED FROM PROCESS VESSEL CLEANING.

0.3 IGNITABLE, TOXIC AND CORROSIVE CLEANOUT SOLUTION, ( ACETONE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, HYDROCHLORIC ACID). GENERATED FROM VESSEL CLEANING.

18.6 SPENT TOXIC SOLVENT, ( METHYLENE CHLORIDE). SENT OFFSITE FOR RECOVERY. GENERATED FROM ORGANIC CHEMICAL MANUFACTURE.

42.5 DISTILLATION STILLBOTTOMS AND SPENT SOLVENT. CONTAINS ISOPROPANOL OR CYCLOHEXANE. GENERATED FROM ONSITE SOLVENT RECOVERY. Already a distillation by product 2.4 IGNITABLE WASTE OIL, CONTAMINATED WITH CYCLOHEXANE. GENERATED FROM OIL CHANGES ON VACCUM PUMPS.

1.0 INPROCESS SOLVENT SAMPLE STREAMS CONTAINING, METHANOL, TOLUENE, ACETONE OR ACETIC ACID. GENERATED FROM SAMPLING ORGANIC CHEMICAL REACTIONS.

6.0 SPENT SOLVENTS GENERATED FROM PROCESS CLEANOUTS. ( METHANOL, ISOPROPANOL, BUTANOL)

99.7 DISTILLATION STILLBOTTOMS AND SPENT SOLVENT. CONTAINS METHYLENE CHLORIDE AND PYRIDINE. Already a distillation by product 2.7 SPENT PROCESS SOLVENT ( PROPIONIC ACID) GENERATED IN ORGANIC CHEMICAL MANUFACTURE.

0.2 SPENT PROCESS SOLVENT, ( PROPIONIC ACID, M CRESOL) GENERATED IN ORGANIC CHEMICAL MANUFACTURE.

13.1 SPENT IGNITABLE, CORROSIVE, TOXIC LIQUID GENERATED FROM DISTILLATION OF SOLVENTS FROM ORGANIC CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING. CONTAINS CHLOROBENZENE AND HYDROCHLORIC ACID. Already a distillation by product 57.5 SPENT IGNITABLE, TOXIC, CORROSIVE LIQUID. GENERATED FROM THE DISTILLATION OF SOLVENTS IN ORGANIC CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING. CONTAINS CHLOROBENZENE, METHANOL AND HYDROCHLORIC ACID. Already a distillation by product PAD042259374 1,842.2 1,841.9 WASTE FLAMMABLE LIQUID, HEPTANE/ TOLUENE SOLUTION SEPARATED F ROM CAUSTIC WASH 0.2 WASTE COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID, PETROLEUM NAPHTHA USED AS A PARTS CLEANER IN MAINTENANCE SHOP TXD980867345 1,804.0 7.1 RESIN WASTE  OFF GRADE NON SALABLE RESIN USED IN FUEL SUPPL 61.5 MIXED SOLVENTS FROM PROCESS AID OF REACTIONS  10,000 GAL. T 1,735.4 AQUEOUS/ SOLVENT SOLUTION  CHEMICALS/ WASTEWATER FROM REACTIO PAD003008943 1,741.4 9.3 INKS, DYES, ALCOHOLS AND ADHESIVES FROM CONSUMER HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS AND PHARMAUCEUTICALS PACKAGING OPERATIONS 0.8 MIXTURE CONTAINING PETROLEUM NAPHTHA USED IN MACHINERY PARTS WASHER 1,695.0 OFF SPEC PRODUCTION WASTE CONTAINING FLAMABLE LIQUIDS 33.5 ALCOHOLS MIXTURES USED IN THE PRODUCTION OF CONSUMER HEALTHC ARE PRODUCTS AND PHARMACEUTICALS 2.9 OUT DATED OR EXPIRED FLAVORINGS USED IN THE PRODUCTION OF CO NSUMER HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS PRD090346909 1,618.1 IGNITABLE SPENT SOLVENT FROM THE PRODUCTION OF PHARMACEUTICA LS PRODUCT.

LAD003913183 1,491.5 WASTE FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS ( ETHANOL/ PROPANOL)

OHD004282976 1,558.9 1,153.9 WASTE FLAMMABLE LIQUID  SPENT SOLVENT 136.3 WASTE GELLED ALKYD RESIN CONTAINING NAPHTHA 268.8 WASTE OFF SPECIFICATION SOLVENT BORNE PAINT TXD096037932 1,596.0 956.0 MIXED ORGANIC LIQUIDS WITH 140 F.

637.6 WASTE ISOBUTANOL AND DIOL 0.6 FURFURAL WASTE 1.8 ISOBUTYRALDEHYDE WASTE TXD980625966 1,510.0 1,494.8 RED OIL AND RED OIL POLYMER WITH HAN 15.1 METHANOL/ PROPANOL MIXTURE 0.1 DIMETHYL SULFIDE GAD075876623 1,569.7 0.0 SPENT SOLVENT FROM QUALITY CONTROL TESTING ( CONTAINS PYRIDIN E AND DICHLOROMETHANE), IGNITABLE AND TOXIC 6.1 ORGANIC DEFECTIVE PAINT, IGNITABLE, TOXIC FOR METALS AND MEK 388.7 DEFECTIVE SOLVENT BASED PAINT AND SPENT SOLVENT ( IGNITABLE A ND TOXIC CONTAINS METALS AND SOLVENT)

1.6 EPOXY PRIMER, IGNITABLE 1,173.3 SPENT SOLVENT FROM CLEANING PAINT PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT, IGNI TABLE AND TOXIC TXD008088833 1,574.2 0.7 MIXED LIQUID LABORATORY WASTE FROMTECHNICAL LABORATORY ACTIV 37.9 POLYMER BLOWDOWN CONAINING SOLVENT. INITIAL GENERATION 1996 1,497.1 SPENT NON HALOGENATED SOLVENT FROM LOW DENSITY POLYETHYLENE 0.2 HALOGENATED LABORATORY SOLVENT FROM QUALITY CONTROL LABORATO 0.4 QUALITY CONTROL LABORATORY WASTE. FIRST GENERATED 1980.

1.7 PILOT PLANT WASTE SOLVENT GENERATED DURING POLYETHYLENE 5.0 PLANT DEGREASER, HAZARDOUS LIQUID. MAINTENANCE PARTS WASHER 1.3 PAINT THINNER, CHLOROBENZENE.

0.5 SP SOLVENT/ MONOMER/ AND ADDITIVES 29.4 SPECIALTY POLYMER WASTE INACTIVE CATALYST. GENERATED DURING 0.1 POLYARD, HAZARDOUS, LIQUID, RESIDUE FROM LOW DENSITY POLYETH TXD008088247 1,550.6 31.2 BCHLOR WASH WATER 18.7 DIOL WASTE FROM THE MANUFACTURE AND PURIFICATION OF DIOL PRO 919.2 DBE REACTOR BOTTOMS / MANUFACTURE OF DIBASIC ESTERS 562.4 REACTOR WASH SOLUTION / PROCESS EQUIPMENT CLEANING / FEB. 19 0.2 OTHER ORGANIC LIQUIDS 0.2 LIQUID WASTE FROM THE MANUFACTURE OF SIMA.

0.7 BENZYL CHLORIDE WASTES 18.0 AQUEOUS REACTOR WASH SOLUTION CAD070635669 1,266.5 FLAMMABLE SPENT SOLVENT FROM THE MANUFACTURING OF BULK PHARMACEUTICALS WHICH INCLUDE A MIXTURE OF TOLUENE, METHANOL ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL, ETHYL ACETATE AND ETHANOL LAD098168206 1,259.0 HEAVY ENDS/ OFF SPEC PRODUCT FROM PRODUCTION OF ETHYLENE DICH LORIDE BY " DIRECT CHLORINATION" PROCESS, EDC, 1,1,2 TRICHLOR OETHYLENE,

BIS 2 CHLOROETHYL ETHER TXD065096273 1,677.9 24.6 OFF SPECIFICATION BUTYL ACRYLATE 0.1 LIGHT ENDS FROM BUTYL METHACRYLATE/ ISO BUTYL METHACRYLATE PR 1.9 IMMERSION SOLVENT USED IN SAFETY KLEEN PARTS WASHERS 3.0 PAINT/ THINNER MIXTURES. GENERATED FROM PAINTING AND MAINTEN 865.5 81R RESIDUE. MANUFACTURING WASTE FROM THE PRODUCTION OF 81R 49.0 METHYL METHACRYLATE, OFF SPEC PRODUCT.

455.5 B 3 LIGHT ENDS. MANUFACTURING BYPRODUCT OF MMA AND MAA PROD 11.7 OFF SPEC METHACRYLIC ACID PRODUCT 17.1 METHYL METHACRYLATE TANK WASHINGS AND DISCHARGES. FROM CRUD 0.0 SAFETY KLEEN SOLVENT, USED IN DEGREASING OPERATIONS AND PART 226.0 BMA BLEED STRIPPER BOTTOMS. MANUFACTURING WASTE FROM THE PR 23.3 ACETIC ACID, COPRODUCT OF ACRYLIC ACID PRODUCTION. DISCARDE WVD005005483 1,823.8 385.3 IGNITABLE MATERIAL FROM UNIT PRODUCTION ( PVA/ IPA STREAM)

0.2 DISCARDED RAW MATERIAL CYCLOHEXANONE.

440.6 IGNITABLE RESIDUES CONTAINING CHROMIUM FROM UNIT PRODUCTION ( CBM RESIDUES).

1.8 MISCELLANEOUS IGNITABLE ORGANIC MATERIALS FROM PLANT LABORAT ORY.

6.2 PAINT WASTE CONTAINING VARIOUS SOLVENTS.

368.9 IGNITABLE MATERIAL FROM PRODUCTION ( PVA RESIDUES).

2.1 MISCELLANEOUS IGNITABLE OUT OF DATE PRODUCTS.

49.1 IGNITABLE RESIDUES FROM PRODUCTION OF DIENE 299 CONTAINING A LCOHOLS.

414.1 IGNITABLE RESIDUES CONTAINING BENZENE FROM UNIT PRODUCTION ( MVA RESIDUES).

18.4 IGNITABLE MATERIAL FROM UNIT PRODUCTION ( PVA LA 1 WASTE).

42.6 IGNITABLE RESIDUES CONTAINING BENZENE AND METHYL ETHYL KETO NE FROM UNIT PRODUCTION ( ACETONE RECOVERY).

55.0 FLAMMABLE WASTE FROM OVERHEAD STRIP; MIXTURE CONTAINS ISOPRO PANOL AND VINYL ETHYL ETHER.

39.6 IGNITABLE RESIDUES CONTAINING BENZENE AND METHYL ETHYL KETON E FROM UNIT PRODUCTION ( MVA RESIDUES).


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 18049]
[FR Doc No: 2021-07105]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP21-661-000.
    Applicants: Northern Border Pipeline Company.
    Description: (doc-less) Motion to Intervene of Northern States
Power Company--Minnesota.
    Filed Date: 3/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20210330-5304.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-662-000.
    Applicants: LA Storage, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Filing of Negotiated Rate,
Conforming IW Agreements 4.1.21 to be effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20210330-5170.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-663-000.
    Applicants: Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Annual Gas Compressor Fuel Report of Kern River Gas
Transmission Company.
    Filed Date: 3/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20210330-5211.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 31, 2021.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-07105 Filed 4-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 7, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 193)]
[Notices]
[Page 51626-51628]
[DOCID:fr07oc09-104]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60746; File No. SR-CBOE-2009-070]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Related to
Preferred Market Makers

September 30, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 28, 2009, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``CBOE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the CBOE.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The CBOE is proposing to amend its Preferred Market-Maker program
to allow for the preferencing of complex orders entered into the
complex order book (``COB'') and the complex order RFR auction
(``COA''). In addition, CBOE is proposing to make a clarification
regarding the existing operation of the Preferred Market-Maker program
for simple orders. The text of the proposed rule change is available on
the Exchange's Web site at (http://www.cboe.org/Legal), at the Office
of the Secretary, CBOE, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is proposing to adopt a Preferred Market-Maker program
for complex orders that is modeled after its existing Preferred Market-
Maker program for simple orders, Rule 8.13. Under the proposal, the
Exchange may allow, on a class-by-class basis, for the receipt of
Preferred Market-Maker complex orders through the COB and/or COA
systems, and a qualifying recipient of a Preferred Market-Maker complex
order shall be afforded a participation entitlement.
    Under the proposal, any Exchange Market-Maker type could be
designated as a Preferred Market-Maker (e.g., Lead Market-Maker,
Designated Primary Market-Maker, Market-Makers), however, the Hybrid
System is programmed so that a recipient of a Preferred Market-Maker
complex order would only receive a participation entitlement for such
complex order if the following provisions are met: First, whether the
participation entitlement is applied to COB and/or COA, the Preferred
Market-Maker has an appointment/allocation in the relevant option
class. Second, with respect to classes where there is a participation
entitlement for COB, the Preferred Market-Maker is quoting in COB at
the best net priced bid/offer when the order is received. With respect
to classes where there is a participation entitlement for COA, (i) at
the beginning of the auction, the Preferred Market-Maker is quoting at
either (a) the best bid/offer on the Exchange in at least one of the
component series of the complex order or (b) the best net priced bid/
offer in COB for the complex order; and (ii) at the conclusion of the
auction, the Preferred Market-Maker is quoting at the best net priced
bid/offer in COA.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ In this regard, CBOE's proposal prohibits an order flow
provider from notifying a Preferred Market-Maker regarding its
intention to submit a preferenced complex order so that such
Preferred Market-Maker could change its quotation to match the NBBO
immediately prior to submission of the preferenced order, and then
fade its quote. CBOE states that Rule 4.18, Prevention of the Misuse
of Material, Nonpublic Information, prohibits this sort of misuse of
material, non-public information. Further, CBOE represents that it
will conduct surveillance for, and enforce against, such violations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Provided the eligibility requirements have been met, the Preferred
Market-Maker participation entitlement would be 40% when there are two
or more Market-Makers also quoting at the best net priced bid/offer
execution price (which is the price at the time a complex order is
received in the case of a COB participation entitlement or the price at
the conclusion of the auction in the case of a COA participation
entitlement), and 50% when there is only one other Market-Maker quoting
at the best net priced bid/offer execution price.\4\ In addition, the
following would apply: First, the Preferred Market-Maker would not be
allocated a total quantity greater than the quantity that the Preferred
Market-Maker is quoting at the best net priced bid/offer execution
price. Second, the entitlement would be based on the number of
contracts remaining after the incoming complex order has traded against
equivalent derived net priced orders and quotes in the individual
series of the EBook and equivalent net priced public customer complex
orders resting in COB that have priority over the Preferred Maker-Maker
in accordance with Rule 6.53C, Complex Orders on the Hybrid System.
Third, if a Preferred Market-Maker receives a participation entitlement
for its complex order resting in COB or its response to COA, then no
other participation entitlements for complex orders set forth in
Exchange Rules (e.g., Rule 8.87, Participation Entitlement of DPMs and
e-DPMs, and Rule 8.15B, Participation Entitlement of LMMs) shall apply
to complex orders resting in COB or entered in response to COA.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange notes that, if a Market-Maker is also eligible
for an allocation pursuant to the operation of the applicable
algorithm in effect for a class (for example, an allocation based on
price-time or a pro rata percentage), the Market-Maker would be
entitled to receive an allocation (not to exceed the size of the
Market-Maker's quote) of the greater of the amount the Market-Maker
would be entitled to pursuant to the participation entitlement or
the amount it would otherwise receive pursuant to the operation of
the algorithm in accordance with Rule 6.45A or 6.45B, as applicable.
    \5\ The Exchange notes that, to the extent a complex order
trades with the equivalent derived net priced orders and quotes in
the individual series of the EBook, there may also be a
participation entitlement applied to those individual series legs in
accordance with Rule 6.45A or 6.45B, as applicable. For example, if
a complex order executes against the individual series legs, then
the remainder executes against COB resting orders or COA responses,
a Preferred Market-Maker entitlement may apply both on the
individual series legs execution and on the COB or COA execution.
Also, if a complex order automatically exercises against the
individual series legs upon receipt or at the conclusion of a COA, a
Preferred Market-Maker entitlement may apply to the individual
series legs. Similarly, if a resting complex order becomes
marketable against the individual series legs, a Preferred Market-
Maker entitlement may apply to the individual series legs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Lastly, the proposed rule text notes that a Preferred Market-Maker
must comply with the quoting obligations applicable to its Market-Maker
type under Exchange rules and must provide continuous electronic quotes
(as defined in Rule 1.1(ccc)) in at least 90% of the series of each
class for which it receives Preferred Market-Maker orders in accordance
with the requirements for the preferencing of simple orders (the ``90%
quoting obligation'').
    In this regard, the Exchange is proposing to revise the existing
text of Rule 8.13 regarding the current operation of its preferencing
program for simple orders to more specifically reflect the way the
Hybrid System operates. Substantively, the requirements of the rule are
not changing. The existing rule text indicates that a recipient of a
Preferred Market-Maker order will only receive a participation
entitlement for such order if the following provisions are met: (i) The
Preferred Market-Maker must have an appointment/allocation in the
relevant option class; (ii) the Preferred Market-Maker must be quoting
at the best bid/offer on the Exchange; and (iii) the Preferred Market-
Maker must comply with the quoting obligations applicable to its
Market-Maker type under Exchange rules and must provide continuous
electronic quotes (as defined in Rule 1.1(ccc)) in at least 90% of the
series of each class for which it receives Preferred Market-Maker
orders. The Exchange is amending the text to clarify that the Hybrid
System is programmed so that the recipient of a Preferred Market-Maker
order will only receive a participation entitlement for such order if
provisions (i) and (ii) above are met. Separately, a Preferred Market-
Maker must also comply with the quoting obligations applicable to its
Market-Maker type under Exchange rules and the 90% quoting obligation.
The 90% quoting obligation, as with the various other Market-Making
quoting obligations, are subject to Exchange market performance,
surveillance, and/or disciplinary programs to assess and enforce
compliance.

2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act
\6\ in general and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act \7\ in particular in that it should promote just and equitable
principles of trade, serve to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and
protect investors and the public interest. The proposed rule change
will help generate greater complex order flow for the Exchange and
provide additional incentives for Market-Makers to trade with that
order flow, which in turn adds depth and liquidity to CBOE's markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2009-070 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2009-070. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the CBOE. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2009-070 and should be
submitted on or before October 28, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-24078 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P