[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57547-57549]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22796]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP14-497-000]

Dominion Transmission, Inc.; Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Assessment for the Proposed New Market Project, Request
for Comments on Environmental Issues, and Notice of Public Scoping
Meeting

    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of the New Market Project (Project)
involving construction and operation of facilities by Dominion
Transmission, Inc. (Dominion) in multiple counties in upstate New York
(NY). The Commission will use this EA in its decision-making process to
determine whether the Project is in the public convenience and
necessity.
    This notice announces the opening of the scoping process the
Commission will use to gather input from the public and interested
agencies on the Project. Your input will help the Commission staff
determine what issues they need to evaluate in the EA. Please note that
the scoping period will close on October 20, 2014.
    You may submit comments in written form or verbally. Further
details on how to submit written comments are in the Public
Participation section of this notice. In lieu of or in addition to
sending written comments, the Commission invites you to attend the
public scoping meeting scheduled as follows:

October 8, 2014, 7:30 p.m., FERC Public Scoping Meeting--New Market
Project, Town of Georgetown Town Hall, 995 State Route 26, Georgetown,
NY 13072

    This notice is being sent to the Commission's current environmental
mailing list for this Project. State and local government
representatives should notify their constituents of this proposed
Project and encourage them to comment on their areas of concern.
    If you are a landowner receiving this notice, a pipeline company
representative may contact you about the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the proposed facilities. The company
would seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable agreement. However, if
the Commission approves the Project, that approval conveys with it the
right of eminent domain. Therefore, if easement negotiations fail to
produce an agreement, the pipeline company could initiate condemnation
proceedings where compensation would be determined in accordance with
state law.
    Dominion provided landowners with a fact sheet prepared by the FERC
entitled ``An Interstate Natural Gas Facility On My Land? What Do I
Need To Know?'' This fact sheet addresses a number of typically-asked
questions, including the use of eminent domain and how to participate
in the Commission's proceedings. It is also available for viewing on
the FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov).

Summary of the Proposed Project

    Dominion proposes to construct and operate 2 new compressor
stations (CS) and add additional compression and minor changes at 3
existing CS. Dominion would also modify a meter station in Schenectady
County, NY. Specifically, the New Market Project would consist of the
following proposed facilities:
     Construction of the new Horseheads CS in Chemung County;
     installation of gas coolers and filter/separator at the
existing Borger CS in Tompkins County;

     construction of the new Sheds CS in Madison County;
     installation of gas coolers and filter/separator at the
existing Utica CS in Herkimer County;
     installation of additional engine and turbine driven
compressor units at the existing Brookman CS in Montgomery County; and
     modifications to the existing West Schenectady Meter
Station in Schenectady County.
    The general location of the Project facilities is shown in appendix
1.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The appendices referenced in this notice will not appear in
the Federal Register. Copies of appendices were sent to all those
receiving this notice in the mail and are available at www.ferc.gov
using the link called ``eLibrary'' or from the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, or call
(202) 502-8371. For instructions on connecting to eLibrary, refer to
the last page of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Land Requirements for Construction

    Construction of the proposed facilities would disturb about 200
acres of land for the aboveground facilities. Following construction,
Dominion would maintain about 78 acres for permanent operation of the
Project facilities; the remaining acreage would be restored and revert
to former uses.

The EA Process

    The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the
Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could
result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us
\2\ to discover and address concerns the public may have about
proposals. This process is referred to as ``scoping.'' The main goal of
the scoping process is to focus the analysis in the EA on the important
environmental issues. By this notice, the Commission requests public
comments on the scope of the issues to address in the EA. We will
consider all filed comments during the preparation of the EA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ ``We,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the environmental staff
of the Commission's Office of Energy Projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the EA we will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of
the construction and operation of the proposed Project under these
general headings:
     Geology and soils;
     water resources, fisheries, and wetlands;
     cultural resources;
     socioeconomics;
     land use;
     vegetation and wildlife;
     air quality and noise; and
     public safety.
    We will also evaluate reasonable alternatives to the proposed
Project or portions of the Project, and make recommendations on how to
lessen or avoid impacts on the various resource areas.
    The EA will present our independent analysis of the issues. The EA
will be available in the public record through the FERC's eLibrary
system. Depending on the comments received during the scoping process,
we may also publish and distribute the EA to the public for an allotted
comment period. We will consider all comments on the EA before making
our recommendations to the Commission. To ensure we have the
opportunity to consider and address your comments, please carefully
follow the instructions in the Public Participation section beginning
on page 5.
    With this notice, we are asking agencies with jurisdiction by law
and/or special expertise with respect to the environmental issues of
this Project to formally cooperate with us in the preparation of the
EA.\3\ Agencies that would like to request cooperating agency status
should follow the instructions for filing comments provided under the
Public Participation section of this notice. Currently, the New York
State Department of Agriculture and Markets has expressed its intention
to participate as a cooperating agency in the preparation of the EA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Council on Environmental Quality regulations addressing
cooperating agency responsibilities are at Title 40, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 1501.6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consultations Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act

    In accordance with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
implementing regulations for section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act, we are using this notice to initiate consultation
with the applicable State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), and to
solicit their views and those of other government agencies, interested
Indian tribes, and the public on the Project's potential effects on
historic properties.\4\ We will define the project-specific Area of
Potential Effects (APE) in consultation with the SHPO as the Project
develops. On natural gas facility projects, the APE at a minimum
encompasses all areas subject to ground disturbance (examples include
construction right-of-way, contractor/pipe storage yards, compressor
stations, and access roads). Our EA for this Project will document our
findings on the impacts on historic properties and summarize the status
of consultations under section 106.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's regulations
are at Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 800. Those
regulations define historic properties as any prehistoric or
historic district, site, building, structure, or object included in
or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Currently Identified Environmental Issues

    We have already identified several issues that we think deserve
attention based on a preliminary review of the proposed facilities,
comments received from the public, and the environmental information
provided by Dominion. This preliminary list of issues may be changed
based on your comments and our analysis.
     Air quality--health impacts from emissions;
     Socioeconomic issues--traffic, home values;
     Noise and vibration;
     Land use--industrialization; and
     Public safety.

Public Participation

    You can make a difference by providing us with your specific
comments or concerns about the Project. Your comments should focus on
the potential environmental effects, reasonable alternatives, and
measures to avoid or lessen environmental impacts. The more specific
your comments, the more useful they will be. To ensure that your
comments are timely and properly recorded, please send your comments so
that the Commission receives them in Washington, DC on or before
October 20, 2014.
    For your convenience, there are three methods which you can use to
submit your comments to the Commission. In all instances please
reference the Project docket number (CP14-497-000) with your
submission. The Commission encourages electronic filing of comments and
has expert staff available to assist you at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (1) You can file your comments electronically using the eComment
feature on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. This is an easy method for interested persons to
submit brief, text-only comments on the Project;
    (2) You can file your comments electronically using the eFiling
feature on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. With eFiling, you can provide comments in a
variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your submission.
New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking on
``eRegister.'' You must select

the type of filing you are making. If you are filing a comment on a
particular project, please select ``Comment on a Filing''; or
    (3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the following address:
    Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426.

Environmental Mailing List

    The environmental mailing list includes federal, state, and local
government representatives and agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest groups; Native American Tribes; other
interested parties; and local libraries and newspapers. This list also
includes all affected landowners (as defined in the Commission's
regulations) who are potential right-of-way grantors, whose property
may be used temporarily for Project purposes, or who own homes within
certain distances of aboveground facilities, and anyone who submits
comments on the Project. We will update the environmental mailing list
as the analysis proceeds to ensure that we send the information related
to this environmental review to all individuals, organizations, and
government entities interested in and/or potentially affected by the
proposed Project.
    If we publish and distribute the EA, copies will be sent to the
environmental mailing list for public review and comment. If you would
prefer to receive a paper copy of the document instead of the CD
version or would like to remove your name from the mailing list, please
return the attached Information Request (appendix 2).

Becoming an Intervenor

    In addition to involvement in the EA scoping process, you may want
to become an ``intervenor'' which is an official party to the
Commission's proceeding. Intervenors play a more formal role in the
process and are able to file briefs, appear at hearings, and be heard
by the courts if they choose to appeal the Commission's final ruling.
An intervenor formally participates in the proceeding by filing a
request to intervene. Instructions for becoming an intervenor are in
the User's Guide under the ``e-filing'' link on the Commission's Web
site.

Additional Information

    Additional information about the Project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC Web site at www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Click on the
eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter the docket number,
excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field (i.e., CP14-
497). Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link also provides access to the
formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders, notices, and
rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission now offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.
    Finally, public meetings or site visits will be posted on the
Commission's calendar located at www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along with other related information.

    Dated: September 18, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-22796 Filed 9-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: February 6, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 24)]
[Notices]
[Page 5479-5481]
[DOCID:fr06fe07-68]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-55206; File No. SR-NASD-2007-008]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Extending the Pilot Periods for NASD Rules Governing
Multiple MPIDs on the Trade Reporting Facilities and on the Alternative
Display Facility

January 31, 2007.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(``Act'')\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 26, 2007, the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. (``NASD'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by NASD. NASD
has filed the proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\
and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    NASD proposes to amend NASD Rules 4613A(b) and 5140 to extend the
pilot programs for the use of multiple Market Participant Symbols
(``MPIDs'') for Registered Reporting Alternative Display Facility
(``ADF'') electronic communications networks (``ECNs'') and Trade
Reporting Facility Participants. The text of the proposed rule change
is available at NASD, the Commission's Public Reference Room, and
http://www.nasd.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NASD included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. NASD has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose

Rule 4613A(b) and IM-4613A-1

    Rule 4613A(b) (Character of Quotations) provides that a Registered
Reporting ADF ECN may request additional MPIDs for displaying quotes
and orders and reporting trades through the ADF trade reporting
facility, the Trade Reporting and Comparison Service, for any ADF-
Eligible Security. A Registered Reporting ADF ECN that is permitted the
use of additional MPIDs for displaying quotes and orders is subject to
the same rules applicable to the member's first quotation (i.e., an ECN
that displays one or more additional quotes/orders is required to
comply with all rules applicable to ECNs in their display of quotes/
orders). A Registered Reporting ADF ECN also is prohibited from using
an additional MPID to accomplish indirectly what it is prohibited from
doing directly through its Primary MPID. In addition, NASD staff
retains full discretion to determine whether a bona fide regulatory
and/or business need exists for being granted an additional MPID
privilege and to limit or withdraw the additional MPID display
privilege at any time. The procedures for requesting, and the
restrictions surrounding the use of, multiple MPIDs are set forth in
IM-4613A-1 (Procedures for Allocation of Multiple MPIDs).
    The Commission approved Rule 4613A(b) and IM-4613A-1 on a pilot
basis on August 11, 2006.\5\ By its terms, the pilot period expires on
January 26, 2007, and NASD has determined to seek an extension of the
pilot period until January 25, 2008. NASD believes that such an
extension will provide additional time to analyze the use of multiple
MPIDs on the ADF. NASD is not proposing any other changes to the pilot
as this time.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54307 (August 11,
2006), 71 FR 47551 (August 17, 2006).
    \6\ The expiration of the pilot period coincided with the
expiration of the current ADF pilot period. See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 53699 (April 21, 2006), 71 FR 25271 (April 28,
2006). In a separate rule filing, NASD proposed to make the ADF
rules permanent. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55181
(January 26, 2007) (SR-NASD-2007-005). At this time, NASD is seeking
to extend only Rule 4613A(b) and IM-4613A-1 for another year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rule 5140 and IM-5140

    Rule 5140 (Multiple MPIDs for Trade Reporting Facility
Participants) provides that any Trade Reporting Facility Participant
that wishes to use more than one MPID for purposes of reporting trades
to a Trade Reporting Facility must submit a written request to, and
obtain approval from, NASD Operations for such additional MPIDs. In
addition, IM-5140 (Use of Multiple MPIDs) states that NASD considers
the issuance of, and trade reporting with, multiple MPIDs to be a
privilege and not a right. A Trade Reporting Facility Participant must
identify the purpose(s) and system(s) for which the multiple MPIDs will
be used. If NASD determines that the use of multiple MPIDs is
detrimental to the marketplace, or that a Trade Reporting Facility
Participant is using one or more additional MPIDs improperly or for
other than the purpose(s) identified by the Participant, NASD staff
retains full discretion to limit or withdraw its grant of the
additional MPID(s) to such Trade Reporting Facility Participant for
purposes of reporting trades to a Trade Reporting Facility. NASD
believes that Rule 5140 and IM-5140 are necessary to consolidate the
process of issuing, and tracking the use of, multiple MPIDs used to
report trades to NASD Trade Reporting Facilities.
    The Commission approved Rule 5140 on a pilot basis on November 6,
2006.\7\ By its terms, the pilot period expires on January 26, 2007,
and NASD has determined to seek an extension of the pilot period until
January 25, 2008. NASD believes that such an extension will provide
additional time to analyze the use of multiple MPIDs on the Trade
Reporting Facilities. NASD is not proposing any other changes to the
pilot as this time. NASD proposes to implement the proposed rule change
on January 27, 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54715 (November 6,
2006), 71 FR 66354 (November 14, 2006); see also Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 54715A (November 14, 2006), 71 FR 67183 (November
20, 2006) (correcting original approval order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\8\ which requires, among
other things, that NASD rules be designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. NASD believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with these requirements because it would provide a process
by which ECNs (in the case of the ADF) and Trade Reporting Facility
Participants (in the case of the Trade Reporting Facilities) can
request, and NASD can properly allocate, the use of additional MPIDs
for displaying quotes and orders through the ADF or reporting trades to
a Trade Reporting Facility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    NASD does not believe that the proposed rule change would result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing proposed rule change is subject to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \9\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder \10\
because the proposal: (i) Does not significantly affect the protection
of investors or the public interest; (ii) does not impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) does not become operative
prior to 30 days after the date of filing or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \11\ Rule 19b-4(f)(6) also requires the self-regulatory
organization to give the Commission notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the
proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as
designated by the Commission. NASD has satisfied the five-day pre-
filing requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NASD has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative
delay in this case. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day
operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest because such waiver will allow the benefits of the
multiple MPID pilots to continue uninterrupted. For this reason, the
Commission designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon
filing with the Commission.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ For the purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative
delay, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors or otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NASD-2007-008 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2007-008. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the filing
also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal
office of NASD. All comments received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NASD-2007-008 and should be submitted on or before February 27, 2007.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-1859 Filed 2-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18557-18558]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08973]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0220; FRL-9977-15-OAR]

Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request; Mobile
Air Conditioner Retrofitting Program (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is planning to submit an
information collection request (ICR), ``Mobile Air Conditioner
Retrofitting Program (Renewal)'' (EPA ICR No. 1774.07, OMB Control No.
2060-0350) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. Before doing
so, EPA is soliciting public comments on specific aspects of the
proposed information collection as described below. EPA is announcing
its intent to renew this ICR with no substantive changes. This is a
proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through July
31, 2018. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not
required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 26, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2018-0220, online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), by
email to [email protected], or by mail to: EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christina Thompson, Environmental
Protection Agency, Stratospheric Protection Division, Office of
Atmospheric Programs, MC 6205T, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202)
564-0983; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA is soliciting
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of
the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. EPA
will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as appropriate.
The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for review and
approval. At that time, EPA will issue another Federal Register notice
to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to
submit additional comments to OMB.
    Abstract: EPA's Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program
implements Section 612 of the 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments which
authorized the Agency to establish regulatory requirements to ensure
that ozone-depleting substances (ODS) are replaced by alternatives that
reduce overall risks to human health and the environment, and to
promote an expedited transition to safe substitutes. To promote this
transition, CAA specified that EPA establish an information
clearinghouse of available alternatives, and coordinate with other
Federal agencies and the public on research, procurement practices, and
information and technology transfers.
    Since the program's inception in 1994, SNAP has reviewed over 400
new chemicals and alternative manufacturing processes for a wide range
of consumer, industrial, space exploration, and national security
applications. Roughly 90% of alternatives submitted to EPA for review
have been listed as acceptable for a specific use, typically with some
condition or limit to minimize risks to human health and the
environment.
    Regulations promulgated under SNAP require that Motor Vehicle Air
Conditioners (MVACs) retrofitted to use a SNAP substitute refrigerant
include basic information on a label to be affixed to the air
conditioner. The label includes the name of the substitute refrigerant,
when and by whom the retrofit was performed, environmental and safety
information about the substitute refrigerant, and other information.
This information is needed so that subsequent technicians working on
the MVAC system will be able to service the equipment properly,
decreasing the likelihood of significant refrigerant cross-
contamination and potential failure of air conditioning systems and
recovery/recycling equipment.
    Form numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Entities potentially affected by
this action are new and used car dealers, gas service stations, top and
body repair shops, general automotive repair shops, automotive repair
shops not elsewhere classified, including air conditioning and radiator
specialty shops.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory under 40 CFR 82.180.
    Estimated number of respondents: 294 (total).
    Frequency of response: Once per retrofit of a motor vehicle air
conditioner.
    Total estimated burden: 8 hours (per year). Burden is defined at 5
CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $580 (per year), includes $10 (per year)
annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in estimates: The previously approved ICR supporting
statement (EPA ICR No. 1774.06, OMB Control No. 2060-0350) is available
in Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0220 at www.regulations.gov. EPA
intends to update the supporting statement for this ICR to reflect
labor rate changes. The Agency anticipates that the total estimated
burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR
Burdens will decline due to the decrease of CFC-12 MVACs available on
the road for retrofitting.

    Dated: April 18, 2018.
Cynthia A. Newberg,
Director, Stratospheric Protection Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-08973 Filed 4-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10610-10611]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04387]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EL16-6-001; ER16-121-000]

PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; Notice Inviting Post-Technical
Conference Comments

    On February 4, 2016, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission) staff conducted a technical conference concerning PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.'s (PJM) existing and proposed Auction Revenue
Rights (ARR) and Financial Transmission Rights (FTR) tariff provisions.
All interested persons are invited to file post-technical conference
comments on PJM's filings and the topics discussed during the technical
conference, including those indicated below.
    Regarding PJM's filing and proposed changes, specifically:
     Whether PJM's conservative modeling of outages that
limited the allocation of Stage 1B ARRs have resulted in an inequitable
cost shift, and please explain why.
     PJM proposes to eliminate portfolio netting. Comment on
the current practice of netting positively valued FTRs against
negatively valued FTRs within an FTR holder's portfolio. Do the current
tariff provisions on netting work to protect the markets against the
potential exercise of manipulation, and if so, how? If netting is
eliminated and causes the potential for the exercise of manipulation,
what measures would need to be put into place to prevent potential
market manipulation? Would allocating surplus funds to load rather than
to FTR holders, or carrying surplus funds forward to fund any future
revenue inadequacy be ways of addressing potential manipulation?
     The appropriateness of using the 1.5 percent adder for all
zones, regardless of the actual zonal load growth rate and negative
load growth projections for some areas; and the appropriateness of
conducting the 10-year study with different growth rates as a
sensitivity study, as is done for other RTEP studies. Is the cost of
building transmission as a result of the 1.5 percent adder justified by
the benefit of being able to accommodate the current allocations in
Stage 1A?
    Regarding PJM's proposed solutions in the context of its current
tariff, please discuss if there are other solutions to consider.
Specifically, please comment on:
     If infeasible Stage 1A ARRs should continue to be awarded
and treated as they are today.

     The options and implications for, and potential benefits
or drawbacks of, ARR allocation based on more frequent updates of the
Simultaneous Feasibility Test model, which could, for example, allow
for seasonal variations of line ratings, as well as more timely
recognition and modeling of transmission outages and upgrades placed
into service.
     The options to update PJM's Simultaneous Feasibility Test
model, including source points and sink points, to reflect current
system usage and topology; concerns about updating the model; the
potential benefits or drawbacks for updating the model; and processes
for allowing more frequent updates. If the Simultaneous Feasibility
Test model were to be updated more frequently, would infeasible ARRs
continue to exist?
     Whether the incentives for Transmission Owners to schedule
outages and conduct timely work align with ARR/FTR construct, and
whether there are any proposals that can improve this alignment; and
the effectiveness of the current reporting requirements for
Transmission Owners to share information with PJM.
     Whether continuing to include balancing congestion \1\ in
the definition of FTRs is appropriate (and why), or whether FTRs should
be defined and settled only including day-ahead congestion. Are there
any aspect(s) of balancing congestion that should be included in the
definition of FTRs, and, if so, what are they and why they should be
included?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Negative balancing congestion occurs when real-time
transmission capacity is less than day-ahead transmission capacity.
FTRs are allocated negative balancing congestion charges, which in
turn can result in FTR underfunding because the revenues allocated
for meeting the FTR funding target amount are decreased.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commenters need not address every question and may provide comments
on relevant issues other than those listed above. These comments are
due no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) on March 15,
2016. Reply comments are due on or before 5:00 p.m. EST on March 29,
2016. The written comments will be included in the formal record for
the proceeding, which, together with the record developed to date, will
form the basis for further Commission action.
    For more information about this Notice, please contact:

Pamela Quinlan (Technical Information), Office of Energy Market
Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Kent Carter (Legal Information), Office of General Counsel, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Daniel Kheloussi (Technical Information), Office of Energy Policy and
Innovation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: February 23, 2016.
 Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.
 Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-04387 Filed 2-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8854-8855]
[FR Doc No: 2020-03122]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IC19-25-000]

Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-551); Comment
Request; Extension

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of information collection and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or
FERC) is soliciting public comment on the currently approved
information collection, FERC-551 (Reporting of Flow Volume and Capacity
by Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines).

DATES: Comments on the collection of information are due March 19,
2020.

ADDRESSES: Comments filed with OMB, identified by the OMB Control No.
1902-0243, should be sent via email to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Attention: Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission Desk Officer:
    A copy of the comments should also be sent to the Commission, in
Docket No. IC19-25-000, by either of the following methods:
     eFiling at Commission's Website: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp.
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Instructions: All submissions must be formatted and filed in
accordance with submission guidelines at: http://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide.asp. For user assistance, contact FERC Online Support
by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by phone at:<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll-free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> for a text telephone (TTY).
    Docket: Users interested in receiving automatic notification of
activity in this docket or in viewing/downloading comments and
issuances in this docket may do so at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/docs-filing.asp.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Brown may be reached by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, and fax at (202)
273-0873.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: FERC-551, Reporting of Flow Volume and Capacity by
Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines.
    OMB Control No.: 1902-0243.
    Type of Request: Three-year extension of the FERC-551 information
collection requirements with no changes to the current reporting
requirements.
    Abstract: The Commission is authorized to facilitate price
transparency in markets for the sale or transportation of physical
natural gas in interstate commerce, having due regard for the public
interest, the integrity of

those markets, fair competition, and the protection of consumers. FERC-
551 uses the information provided by pipelines as part of its overall
implementation of the statutory provisions of section 23 of the Natural
Gas Act, 16 U.S.C. 717t-2. More specifically, the Commission relies, in
part, on section 23(a)(1) of the Natural Gas Act, for authority to
collect this information and uses the pipelines' FERC-551 postings as
part of fulfilling the transparency provisions of section 23(a)(1) of
the Natural Gas Act. The data requirements for pipelines are in listed
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) under 18 CFR 284.13, reporting
requirements for interstate pipelines. The Commission has directed that
the data requirements under FERC-551 are to be posted on interstate
pipelines' websites and provided in downloadable file formats, in
conformity with 18 CFR 284.12.
    The posting requirements are based on the Commission's authority
under section 23 of the NGA (as added by the Energy Policy Act of
2005), which provides, in relevant part, that the Commission may issue
such rules as necessary and appropriate to provide for the
dissemination of ``information about the availability and prices of
natural gas at wholesale and in interstate commerce.'' \1\ This
provision enhances the Commission's authority to ensure confidence in
the nation's natural gas markets. The Commission's market-oriented
policies for the wholesale natural gas industry require that interested
persons have broad confidence that reported market prices accurately
reflect the interplay of legitimate market forces. Without confidence
in the efficiency of price formation, the true value of transactions is
very difficult to determine. Further, price transparency facilitates
ensuring that jurisdictional prices are ``just and reasonable.'' \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Section 23(a)(2) of the NGA, 15 U.S.C. 717t-2(a)(2) (2000 &
Supp. V 2005).
    \2\ See sections 4 and 5 of the NGA, 15 U.S.C. 717c and 717d.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The posting of FERC-551 information occurs on a daily basis. The
data must be available for download for not less than 90 days from the
date of posting and must be retained by the pipeline for three years.
    The daily posting requirements for major non-interstate pipelines
prescribed in the Commission's Order No. 720 are no longer required.
The number of respondents used to develop the burden estimates do not
include any major non-interstate pipelines.
    Type of Respondents: Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines.
    Estimate of Annual Burden \3\: The Commission estimates the total
public reporting burden and cost for this information collection as
follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Burden is defined as the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. For
further explanation of what is included in the information
collection burden, refer to 5 CFR 1320.3.

                                 FERC-551--Reporting of Flow Volume and Capacity by Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines \4\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Annual  number                                          Total annual  burden
                                        Number of     of  responses   Total number     Average  burden &     hours & total annual    Burden hour & cost
                                       respondents   per respondent   of responses   cost per response \5\           cost            per respondent ($)
                                                (1)             (2)     (1) * (2) =  (4)..................  (3) * (4) = (5)......  (5) / (1)
                                                                                (3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FERC-551...........................             172             365          62,780  0.5 hours; $25.59....  31,390 hrs.;           182.5 hrs.; $9,340.35
                                                                                $1,606,540.20.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comments: Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden and
cost of the collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information collection; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The hourly figures in the 30-day notice differ from the
wages used in the 60-day notice. The figures used here are the most
current figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the National
Industry-Specific Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates.
    \5\ The hourly figure (wages plus benefits) is based on the
average of the occupational categories for 2018 found on the Bureau
of Labor Statistics website (http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm and http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm):
    --Management (Occupation Code: 11-0000): $66.67
    --Business (Occupation Code: 13-0000): $41.98
    --Financial (Occupation Code: 13-2051): $44.92
    These various occupational categories' wage (and benefits)
figures are averaged and weighted equally, giving an average of
$51.19/hour. The resulting wage figure is rounded to $51.00/hour for
use in calculating wage figures in the FERC-551 renewal.

    Dated: February 11, 2020.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-03122 Filed 2-14-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: November 30, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 229)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 73998]
[DOCID:fr30no10-29]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

49 CFR Part 571

[Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0132]
RIN 21217-AK17

Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; New Pneumatic Tires for
Motor Vehicles With a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) of More Than
4,536 Kilograms (10,000 Pounds) and Motorcycles

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NHTSA has received a petition asking the agency to extend the
comment period for its proposal to upgrade the Federal motor vehicle
safety standard (FMVSS) that applies to new pneumatic tires for use on
vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) greater than 10,000
pounds and motorcycles. In the proposal, NHTSA established a deadline
for the submission of written comments of November 29, 2010. In light
of that petition and the need to ensure that all interested parties
have a sufficient amount of time to fully develop their comments, the
agency is extending the deadline for the submission of written comments
by 30 days.

DATES: Written comments must be received by December 29, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments (identified by the NHTSA Docket ID
Number above) by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Soodoo, NHTSA Office of
Rulemaking (Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) (Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>) or Thomas
Healy, NHTSA Office of Chief Counsel (Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) (Fax:
202-366-3820). The mailing address for these officials is: National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building, Washington,
DC 20590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NHTSA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) proposing to upgrade FMVSS No. 119 (49 CFR 571.119), which
applies to new pneumatic tires for vehicles with a GVWR greater than
10,000 pounds and motorcycles. The NPRM was published on September 29,
2010 (75 FR 60037, Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0132). In the NPRM, among
other matters, NHTSA proposed to amend FMVSS No. 119 to adopt a more
stringent endurance test and a new high speed test for heavy vehicle
tires with a load range of F, G, H, J, and L.
    The Rubber Manufacturers Association (RMA), which represents
manufacturers of finished rubber products, including tire
manufacturers, has petitioned for an extension of the comment period on
the NPRM. RMA said that it is requesting a 30-day extension so that its
members can complete all of their additional testing to evaluate the
more stringent endurance test proposed by the agency and to develop new
data to demonstrate differences in outcomes with tire break-in versus
no break-in for the new proposed high speed test. RMA indicated that it
also intends to supplement its earlier test data submitted to the
agency on April 14, 2009. RMA believes that the earlier data set
submitted to the docket, combined with additional new data, will assist
NHTSA in evaluating RMA's comments and arriving at a final rule. RMA
maintains that its members require several weeks to complete even a
small test program of the 47-hour endurance test. Therefore, RMA
indicates that it is not possible for its members to complete all of
their additional testing and have it ready for submittal by November
29, 2010.
    In considering the extension request, NHTSA weighed the complexity
and importance of this rulemaking and the basis for the request. We
have decided there is good cause to grant the petition and extend the
comment period 30 days. The extension is in the public interest since
it will provide the public additional time to prepare and submit useful
technical information that should benefit agency decision-making in
this rulemaking action. Accordingly, NHTSA extends the period for the
submission of written comments in this proceeding to December 29, 2010.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 30111, 30115, 30166 and 30177;
delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50.

    Issued: November 24, 2010.
Joseph S. Carra,
Acting Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2010-30096 Filed 11-24-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-56-P


HOPGUARD® LIQUID

HopGuard Liquid is a Manufacturing Use Product for use in producing the
HopGuard. HopGuard is for use in beehives to control Varroa mites
(Varroa destructor) on honey bees

ACTIVE INGREDIENTS:
       BY WEIGHT

                        Potassium Salts of Hop Beta
Acids…………………………16.0%

OTHER INGREDIENTS:
…………………………………………….….84.0%

                 TOTAL             100.0%

KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN

DANGER

PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS

Hazards to Humans and Domestic Animals

Danger:  Corrosive. Causes irreversible eye damage. Do not get in eyes
or on clothing. Wear (specify appropriate protective eyewear such as
goggles, face shield, or safety glasses).

Wash thoroughly with soap and water after handling and before eating,
drinking, chewing gum, using tobacco or using the toilet. Remove and
wash contaminated clothing before reuse.

FIRST AID

.

IF IN EYES: 	Hold eyelids open and flush with a steady, gentle stream of
water for 15-20 minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present, after the
first 5 minutes, then continue rinsing eye. Call a poison control center
or doctor for advice

IF ON SKIN OR  	Take off contaminated clothing.

CLOTHING:	Rinse skin immediately with plenty of water for 15-20 minutes.

Call a poison control center or doctor for further treatment advice.

IF SWALLOWED: 	Call a poison control center or doctor immediately for
treatment advice.

Have person sip a glass of water if able to swallow.

Do not induce vomiting unless told to do so by poison control center or
doctor.

Do not give anything by mouth to an unconscious person.

Have the product container or label with you when calling a poison
control center or doctor, or going for treatment.  You may also contact
1-800-858-7378 for emergency medical treatment.

For general information on product use, etc., call the National
Pesticides Information Center at 1-800-858-7378. For emergencies, call
the poison control center 1-800-222-1222.

Note to Physician: “Probable mucosal damage may contraindicate the use
of gastric lavage”. See label back panel for additional precautionary
statements.

EPA Registration Number 83623-R              EPA Establishment Number
61671-MN-001

Net Contents: 50 Gallons

PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT (PPE): Applicators and other handlers must
wear appropriate protective eyewear, such as face shield or goggles long
sleeved shirt and long pants, waterproof gloves and shoes plus socks.

DIRECTIONS FOR USE

It is a violation of Federal Law to use this product in a manner
inconsistent with its labeling.

HopGuard Liquid is a Manufacturing use product. Only for use in
formulation into EPA registered pesticides. Formulators using this
product are responsible for providing data required by EPA for
registration of their products. This product may be used to formulate
other products than listed on the Manufacturing or End Use Product label
if the formulator, user group, or grower has complied with U.S. EPA data
submission requirements regarding the support of such use(s).

STORAGE AND DISPOSAL

HopGuard Liquid must be stored in the original tightly sealed drums in a
cool, dark area. Unused, unregistered product must either be returned to
the manufacturer or distributor in unopened containers.

Manufactured by: BetaTec Hop Products, Inc., a Division of John I. Haas,
Inc., 1600 River Road, Yakima, WA 98902

USER SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS:  Users must:

Wash hands before eating, drinking, and chewing gum, using tobacco or
using the toilet.

Remove clothing immediately if pesticide gets inside.  Then wash
thoroughly and put on clean clothing.

Remove PPE immediately after handling this product.  Wash the outside of
gloves before removing.  As soon as possible, wash thoroughly and change
into clean clothing.


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 250 (Thursday, December 29, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 96185-96187]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31548]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[FMCSA Docket No. FMCSA-2016-0222]

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes
Mellitus

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT

ACTION: Notice of final disposition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA confirms its decision to exempt 43 individuals from its
rule prohibiting persons with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM)
from operating commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce.
The exemptions enable these individuals to operate CMVs in interstate
commerce.

DATES: The exemptions were effective on November 22, 2016. The
exemptions expire on November 22, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Christine A. Hydock, Chief,
Medical Programs Division,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64-113,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Electronic Access

    You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at: http://www.regulations.gov.

    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov and/or Room W12-140 on the
ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
    Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.

II. Background

    On October 20, 2016, FMCSA published a notice of receipt of Federal
diabetes exemption applications from 43 individuals and requested
comments from the public (81 FR 72652. The public comment period closed
on November 21, 2016, and two comments were received.
    FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility of the 43 applicants and
determined that granting the exemptions to these individuals would
achieve a level of safety equivalent to or greater than the level that
would be achieved by complying with the current regulation 49 CFR
391.41(b)(3).

Diabetes Mellitus and Driving Experience of the Applicants

    The Agency established the current requirement for diabetes in 1970
because several risk studies indicated that drivers with diabetes had a
higher rate of crash involvement than the general population. The
diabetes rule provides that ``A person is physically qualified to drive
a commercial motor vehicle if that person has no established medical
history or clinical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus currently requiring
insulin for control'' (49 CFR 391.41(b)(3)).
    FMCSA established its diabetes exemption program, based on the
Agency's July 2000 study entitled ``A Report to Congress on the
Feasibility of a Program to Qualify Individuals with Insulin-Treated
Diabetes Mellitus to Operate in Interstate Commerce as Directed by the
Transportation Act for the 21st Century.'' The report concluded that a
safe and practicable protocol to allow some drivers with ITDM to
operate CMVs is feasible. The September 3, 2003 (68 FR 52441), Federal
Register notice in conjunction with the November 8, 2005 (70 FR 67777),
Federal Register notice provides the current protocol for allowing such
drivers to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
    These 43 applicants have had ITDM over a range of 1 to 35 years.
These applicants report no severe hypoglycemic reactions resulting in
loss of consciousness or seizure, requiring the assistance of another
person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred
without warning symptoms, in the past 12 months and no recurrent (2 or
more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the past 5 years. In each case,
an endocrinologist verified that the driver has demonstrated a
willingness to properly monitor and manage his/her diabetes mellitus,
received education related to diabetes management, and is on a stable
insulin regimen. These drivers report no other disqualifying
conditions, including diabetes-related complications. Each meets the
vision requirement at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10).
    The qualifications and medical condition of each applicant were
stated and discussed in detail in the October 20, 2016, Federal
Register notice and they will not be repeated in this notice.

III. Discussion of Comments

    FMCSA received two comments in this proceeding. Shantel Barnes
stated she is in favor of granting Dion A. Harris a diabetes exemption.
Charlies Jones stated he is in favor of granting William D. Lusk a
diabetes exemption.

IV. Basis for Exemption Determination

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) if the exemption
is likely to achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety than
would be achieved without the exemption. The exemption allows the
applicants to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
    To evaluate the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA
considered medical reports about the applicants' ITDM and vision, and
reviewed the treating endocrinologists' medical opinion related to the
ability of the driver to safely operate a CMV while using insulin.
    Consequently, FMCSA finds that in each case exempting these
applicants from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) is
likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the
exemption.

V. Conditions and Requirements

    The terms and conditions of the exemption will be provided to the
applicants in the exemption document and they include the following:
(1) that each individual submit a quarterly monitoring checklist
completed by the treating endocrinologist as well as an annual
checklist with a comprehensive medical evaluation; (2) that each
individual reports within 2 business days of occurrence, all episodes
of severe hypoglycemia, significant complications, or inability to
manage diabetes; also, any involvement in an accident or any other
adverse event in a CMV or personal vehicle, whether or not it is
related to an episode of hypoglycemia; (3) that each individual provide
a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's report to the medical
examiner at the time of the annual medical examination; and (4) that
each individual provide a copy of the annual medical certification to
the employer for retention in the driver's qualification file, or keep
a copy in his/her driver's qualification file if he/she is self-
employed. The driver must also have a copy of the certification when
driving, for presentation to a duly authorized Federal, State, or local
enforcement official.

VI. Conclusion

    Based upon its evaluation of the 43 exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts the following drivers from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(3), subject to the requirements cited above 49 CFR 391.64(b):

Christopher Albano (PA)
Gregory A. Behm (NE)
Helena R. Berry (GA)
Kenneth W. Blizzard (NJ)
Larry A. Brabson, Jr. (OH)
Jeffrey Campbell (IN)
Gregory A. Carroll (MD)
Kent H. Carter (IN)
Archie Chischilly (AZ)
Loren Curtis (MO)
Scott E. Ennis (NY)
Jackson E. Graham, Jr. (NJ)
Patrick E. Gratts (TX)
Alex J. Gravunder (WI)
Dion A. Harris (OK)
Henry C. Hinton III (IN)
Harry L. Hiser III (WV)
George E. Huften (CT)
Patrick L. Jackson (GA)
Antonio J. Katzdorn (ID)
Terry J. Koontz (IL)
Richard H. LaDue (NY)
William D. Lusk (NC)
Clavenda L. Mason (MD)
Kenneth E. McCain (IL)
Glenn J. Michalek (IL)
Christopher M. Minor (OH)
William J. Navickas (PA)
Troi A. Palmer (MD)
Corey M. Planck (MO)
Ronald J. Pomella, Jr. (FL)
Ivan A. Pruss (NJ)
John M. Rawlinson (IN)

Darryl L. Reasby (WI)
Michael A. Roosa (MA)
Gary W. Seal (TN)
Garey W. Smith (TN)
John E. Steltz (MN)
James E. Vaughan, Jr. (TN)
Robert W. Wagner II (OH)
Todd A. Waller (MO)
Kevin A. Warren (OH)
Kevin L. Wendt (WY)

    In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 each exemption is
valid for two years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will
be revoked if the following occurs: (1) The person fails to comply with
the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2)
    the exemption has resulted in a lower level of safety than was
maintained before it was granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption
would not be consistent with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315. If the exemption is still effective at the end of
the 2-year period, the person may apply to FMCSA for a renewal under
procedures in effect at that time.

    Issued on: December 15, 2016.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-31548 Filed 12-28-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 135 (Thursday, July 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 45474]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16575]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Commission Staff Attendance

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives
notice that members of the Commission's staff may attend the following
meetings related to the transmission planning activities of the PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM):

PJM Planning Committee

    July 14, 2016, 9:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m. (EST).

PJM Transmission Expansion Advisory Committee

    July 14, 2016, 11:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m. (EST).
    The above-referenced meetings will be held at: PJM Conference and
Training Center, PJM Interconnection, 2750 Monroe Boulevard, Audubon,
PA 19403.
    The above-referenced meetings are open to stakeholders.
    Further information may be found at www.pjm.com.
    The discussions at the meetings described above may address matters
at issue in the following proceedings:

Docket No. ER16-453, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and Northeast
Transmission Development, LLC
Docket No. ER16-736, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER14-972, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER14-1485, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket Nos. ER13-1944, et al., PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., et al.
Docket No. ER15-1344, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER15-1387, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and Potomac Electric
Power Company
Docket No. ER15-2562, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER15-2563, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. EL15-18, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v.
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. EL15-41, Essential Power Rock Springs, LLC, et. al. v. PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER15-2114, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and Transource West
Virginia, LLC
Docket No. EL15-79, TransSource, LLC v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. EL15-95, Delaware Public Service Commission, et. al., v. PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C., et. al.
Docket No. EL15-67, Linden VFT, LLC v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. EL05-121, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER13-198, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER16-1335, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER16-1232, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER16-1499, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.

    For more information, contact the following:
    Jonathan Fernandez, Office of Energy Market Regulation, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission,<PHONE_NUMBER>
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Alina Halay, Office of Energy Market Regulation, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: July 7, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-16575 Filed 7-13-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 79 (Monday, April 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19122]
[FR Doc No: E9-9523]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Sixth Plenary Meeting, NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a
meeting of the NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force.

DATES: The meeting will be held June 24, 2009 starting at 9 a.m. to 1
p.m. Arrive in FAA Lobby at 8:30 a.m. for visitor check in.

ADDRESSES: FAA Auditorium, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW.,
Suite 850, Washington, DC 20036; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (202)
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice
is hereby given for a NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force
meeting. The agenda will include:
     Opening Plenary (Welcome and Introductions)
     Work Group and Subgroup Status Reports and Planned
Activities
     Discussion and Next Steps
     Closing Plenary (Other Business, Document Production, Date
and Place of Next Meeting, Adjourn)
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
    Members of the public may present a written statement to the
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 20, 2009.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. E9-9523 Filed 4-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39545-39547]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14234]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2015-8257; Directorate Identifier 2015-NE-36-AD;
Amendment 39-18555; AD 2016-12-06]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca S.A. Turboshaft Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Turbomeca S.A. MAKILA 2A and MAKILA 2A1 turboshaft engines. This AD
requires repetitive diffuser inspections and replacement of those
diffusers that fail inspection. This AD was prompted by two occurrences
of crack initiation on a ferrule of the diffuser. We are issuing this
AD to prevent rupture of the ferrule of the diffuser, which could
result in engine fire and damage to the helicopter.

DATES: This AD becomes effective July 22, 2016.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of July 22,
2016.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Turbomeca S.A., 40220 Tarnos, France; phone: (33) 05 59 74 40
00; fax: (33) 05 59 74 45 15. You may view this service information at
the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the Internet at
http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2015-8257.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
8257; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI), the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The address for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
Document Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket

Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Kierstead, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 781-
238-7199; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to the specified products. The
NPRM was published in the Federal Register on March 11, 2016 (81 FR
12834) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    Two occurrences of crack initiation were reported on a ferrule
of diffuser part number (P/N)<PHONE_NUMBER>, which propagated and led
to the ferrule rupture. The investigation shows in both cases that
the ruptured ferrule contacted and punctured the main fuel supply
line, resulting in a fuel leak. This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead to an engine fire, consequently triggering an
uncommanded engine in flight shut down, possibly resulting in an
emergency landing. Prompted by these occurrences, Turbomeca
published Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) No. 298 72 2832 to
provide repetitive inspection instructions.

    This AD requires repetitive inspections of the affected diffuser
and removal of those diffusers that fail the required inspection. You
may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket
on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2015-8257.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM.
    We increased the compliance time for repetitive inspection from 50
hours since last inspection to 300 hours since last inspection. We
updated the revision number and date of Turbomeca S.A. Alert Mandatory
Service Bulletin (MSB) No. A298 72 2832 throughout this AD and changed
the Credit for Previous Actions paragraph as a result of the MSB
change.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD with the changes described
previously. We determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Turbomeca S.A. has issued Alert MSB No. A298 72 2832, Version C,
dated April 15, 2016. The Alert MSB describes procedures for repetitive
inspections of the affected diffuser and depending on findings,
accomplishment of the corrective action(s).

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 10 engines installed on
helicopters of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take about
2 hours per engine to comply with this AD. The average labor rate is
$85 per hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD
on U.S. operators to be $1,700.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2016-12-06 Turbomeca S.A.: Amendment 39-18555; Docket No. FAA-2015-
8257; Directorate Identifier 2015-NE-36-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective July 22, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Turbomeca S.A. MAKILA 2A and MAKILA 2A1
turboshaft engine models with a high-pressure gas generator module
(M03) that has modification (mod) TU 52 installed.

(d) Reason

    This AD was prompted by two occurrences of crack initiation on a
ferrule of the diffuser, which propagated and led to the ferrule
rupture. We are issuing this AD to prevent rupture of the ferrule of
the diffuser, which could result in engine fire and damage to the
helicopter.

(e) Actions and Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
    (1) Borescope inspect the centrifugal diffuser ferrule, part
number<PHONE_NUMBER>, prior to the ferrule accumulating 700 hours, time
since new or time since replacement or within 30 hours from the
effective date of this AD, whichever is later. Use Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraphs 2.4.1 through <IP_ADDRESS>.1, of Turbomeca S.A.
Alert Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) No. 298 72 2832, Version C,
dated April 15, 2016, to do the borescope inspections required by
this AD.

    (2) Repeat the borescope inspection required by this AD every
300 hours since last inspection.
    (3) If any crack, loss of contact between the ferrule and
diffuser axial vane, or any contact between the injection manifold
supply pipe and the diffuser ferrule is found, remove the diffuser
case and replace the ferrule with a part eligible for installation.

(f) Credit for Previous Actions

    You may take credit for the actions required by paragraph (e) of
this AD if you performed those actions using Turbomeca S.A. MSB No.
298 72 2832, Version B, dated October 12, 2015 or earlier versions,
before the effective date of this AD.

(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request. You may email your request to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(h) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Brian Kierstead,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency AD 2015-
0209R1, dated April 20, 2016, for more information. You may examine
the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating it in Docket No.
FAA-2015-8257.

(i) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Turbomeca S.A. Alert MSB No. A298 72 2832, Version C, dated
April 15, 2016.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For Turbomeca S.A. service information identified in this
AD, contact Turbomeca S.A., 40220 Tarnos, France; phone: (33) 05 59
74 40 00; fax: (33) 05 59 74 45 15.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
781-238-7125.
    (5) You may view this service information at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to:
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on June 10, 2016.
Colleen M. D'Alessandro,
Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-14234 Filed 6-16-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P