[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 217 (Thursday, November 8, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55816-55818]
[FR Doc No: 2018-24386]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0934; Product Identifier 2018-NE-35-AD; Amendment
39-19478; AD 2018-22-05]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Engine Alliance Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Engine Alliance (EA) GP7270, GP7272, and GP7277 turbofan engines with a
certain high-pressure turbine (HPT) case installed. This AD requires
removal of affected HPT stator cases (HPT cases) from service and their
replacement with a part eligible for installation. This AD was prompted
by the discovery of a quality escape at a manufacturing facility
involving unapproved welds on HPT cases. We are issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective November 23, 2018.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of November 23,
2018.
    We must receive comments on this AD by December 24, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this final rule, contact
Engine Alliance, 411 Silver Lane, East Hartford, CT 06118; phone: 800-
565-0140; email: [email protected]; website:
www.engineallianceportal.com. You may view this service information at
the

FAA, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2018-0934.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0934; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Operations (phone:
800-647-5527) is listed above. Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Smith, Aerospace Engineer, ECO
Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781-
238-7735; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We learned from EA of a quality escape at one of their suppliers,
AECC Aero Science and Technology Co., Ltd., which was performing welds
on newly-manufactured components to correct errors introduced in their
manufacturing process. These welds were not reviewed or approved by
either EA or the FAA. EA's review of manufacturing records determined
that these parts include HPT cases installed on EA GP7270, GP7272, and
GP7277 turbofan engines. These HPT cases are life limited. The
unapproved repairs reduced the material capability of these HPT cases,
which requires their removal prior to reaching their published
Airworthiness Limitation Section life limit. This condition, if not
addressed, could result in failure of the HPT case, engine fire, and
damage to the airplane. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed EA Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) EAGP7-A72-401, dated
August 23, 2018; and EA Service Bulletin (SB) EAGP7-72-399, dated June
4, 2018. EA ASB EAGP7-A72-401 describes procedures for removing and
replacing the affected HPT case, within the identified cycles. EA SB
EAGP7-72-399 describes procedures for removing and replacing the
affected HPT case within the specified part cycles since new or part
cycles since overhaul. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

AD Requirements

    This AD requires removal of the affected HPT cases from service and
their replacement with a part eligible for installation.

FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date

    No domestic operators use this product. Therefore, we find good
cause that notice and opportunity for prior public comment are
unnecessary. In addition, for the reason stated above, we find that
good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30
days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public
comment. However, we invite you to send any written data, views, or
arguments about this final rule. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number FAA-2018-
0934 and Product Identifier 2018-NE-35-AD at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this final rule. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
final rule because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this final rule.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects zero engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement of the HPT case...........  20 work-hours x $85 per         $339,400        $341,100              $0
                                         hour = $1,700.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs''
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to engines, propellers, and
associated appliances to the Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2018-22-05 Engine Alliance: Amendment 39-19478; Docket No. FAA-2018-
0934; Product Identifier 2018-NE-35-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective November 23, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Engine Alliance (EA) GP7270, GP7272, and
GP7277 turbofan engines, with a high-pressure turbine (HPT) stator
case (HPT case), part number (P/N) 2060M40G02 or 2137M29G01
installed, and with HPT case serial numbers (S/Ns) listed in
Planning Information, Table 1, of EA Alert Service Bulletin (ASB)
EAGP7-A72-401, dated August 23, 2018, and in Planning Information,
Table 1, of EA Service Bulletin (SB) EAGP7-72-399, dated June 4,
2018.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7250, Turbine
Section.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by the discovery of a quality escape at a
manufacturing facility performing unapproved welds on HPT cases. We
are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the HPT case. The unsafe
condition, if not addressed, could result in engine fire and damage
to the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    (1) For HPT cases listed in Planning Information, Table 1, of EA
ASB EAGP7-A72-401, dated August 23, 2018, remove the affected HPT
case from service within the cycles identified in Table 1 of EA SB
EAGP7-A72-401 after the effective date of this AD.
    (2) For HPT cases listed in Planning Information, Table 1, of
EAGP7-72-399, dated June 4, 2018, remove the affected HPT cases from
service, using the number of part cycles since new (PCSN) or part
cycles since overhaul (PCSO), whichever is less, as specified in
Table 1 to paragraph (g)(2) of this AD.

        Table 1 to Paragraph (g)(2) of This AD--Compliance Times
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Remove from service within
               PCSN or PCSO                    these cycles after the
                                              effective date of this AD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Less than 1000............................  150 cycles.
1001 to 2000..............................  125 cycles.
2001 to 3000..............................  100 cycles.
3001 to 4000..............................  75 cycles.
4001 to 5000..............................  50 cycles.
5001 or more..............................  25 cycles.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (3) Replace the removed HPT case with a part eligible for
installation before further flight.

(h) Definitions

    For the purpose of this AD, a ``part eligible for installation''
is any HPT case not identified in paragraph (c) of this AD or an HPT
case listed in this AD that has been inspected and repaired by a
method approved by the Manager, ECO Branch, FAA.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (j) of this AD. You may email your request
to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(j) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Matthew Smith,
Aerospace Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected].

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Engine Alliance (EA) Alert Service Bulletin EAGP7-A72-401,
dated August 23, 2018.
    (ii) EA Service Bulletin EAGP7-72-399, dated June 4, 2018.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Engine Alliance, 411 Silver Lane, East Hartford, CT 06118; phone:
800-565-0140; email: [email protected]; website:
www.engineallianceportal.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Engine and
Propeller Standards Branch, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA
01803. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on November 2, 2018.
Robert J. Ganley,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-24386 Filed 11-7-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


               Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Final Rule
       Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards:
                    State Implementation Plan Requirements
                                 RIN 2060-AQ48
Specific Comments:
 Page 20 (RLSO): To illustrate the types of sources that emit relevant pollutants, Table 1 provides National Emissions Inventory (NEI) data for 2011 that represent nonattainment area anthropogenic and wildfire emissions estimates for direct PM2.5 and the four main PM2.5 precursor gases from major source sectors. Comment: Wildfire was added in the sentence noted here from page 20 yet nowhere is wildfire linked in Table 1 or its footnotes.  The category of "Miscellaneous Sources" notes it as mainly fire, it should include wildfire so a reader can align the table with the text description.

EPA's reply 3 through 7 to comments reflected that EPA does not wish to discuss individual source categories, yet these sections addressing precursors do discuss major contributors to the individual precursors such as EGU's, mobile sources and others.  As "Mainly Fire" is the largest contributor to VOC emissions in Table 1, there are possible conclusions about wildfire and/or prescribed fire as the largest contributors to SOA which the previously submitted comments wish to dispel.  Several possible solutions exist. Reconsider the comments as previously submitted.
 Page 111  -  Reviewer recommends adding the following sentence as the reviewer believes that EPA should include language that supports the flipside that it is not EPA's intent to discourage the use of prescribed fire to reduce wildfire risks, including the risk of wildfire emissions that can harm poplations.  While prescribed fire maynot rise above the threshold for RACM, the reviewer believes that prescribed fire is a form of mitigation.
 The EPA also wants to clarify that it is not the intention to in any way discourage federal, state, local or tribal agencies or private land owners from taking situation-appropriate steps to minimize impacts from prescribed fire emissions on wildland. The EPA encourages all land owners and managers to apply appropriate basic smoke management practices to reduce emissions from prescribed fires, especially where a state has determined that prescribed fires are a significant source affecting air quality.  The EPA believes that prescribed fire can be used where appropriate and with adequate oversight and diligent implementation, as prescribed fire mimics a natural process necessary to manage and maintain fire-adapted ecosystems and climate change adaptation, while reducing risk of uncontrolled emissions from catastrophic wildfires.
 Page 113 (RLSO), please add after the following sentence:  The EPA encourages all land owners and managers to apply appropriate basic smoke management practices to reduce emissions from prescribed fires, especially where a state has determined that prescribed fires are a significant source affecting air quality.  The EPA believes that prescribed fire can be used where appropriate and with adequate oversight and diligent implementation, as prescribed fire mimics a natural process necessary to manage and maintain fire-adapted ecosystems and climate change adaptation, while reducing risk of uncontrolled emissions from catastrophic wildfires.
 Page 114 (RLSO), please add the following: In most cases, state attainment demonstration modeling should assume that wildland prescribed fire and wildfire emissions in the attainment year will be equal to, and have the same temporal and geographic pattern as, those assumed in the baseline inventory year.  If wildfire and prescribed fire are included in the precursor analysis, note that there are substantial differences in the timing, pollutant concentration and atmospheric response of these sources which should be considered.
 Page 115  -  Reviewer recommends adding the language below to help assure commenters (in response to comment 15):
 The EPA received many comments expressing agreement with EPA's recognition of the importance of wildland prescribed fire, and welcoming continued dialogue among states, the EPA, and other federal agencies on how best to ensure that land managers have adequate management tools available, including prescribed fire and some wildfire, but also to ensure that use of these tools does not result in unhealthy air.  The EPA is committed to a dialogue with states, tribes, federal agencies and other stakeholders on an appropriate use of prescribed fires
 Page 117 (RLSO), please add after the following sentence: The EPA received many comments expressing agreement with EPA's recognition of the importance of wildland prescribed fire, and welcoming continued dialogue among states, the EPA, and other federal agencies on how best to ensure that land managers have adequate management tools available, including prescribed fire and some wildfire, but also to ensure that use of these tools does not result in unhealthy air.  The EPA is committed to a dialogue with states, tribes, federal agencies and other stakeholders on an appropriate use of prescribed fires.


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 231 (Monday, December 4, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 84071-84072]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26557]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2023-1899; Airspace Docket No. 23-ASO-37]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of Class D and Class E Airspace, and Establishment of
Class E Airspace; Winston Salem, NC

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends Class D and Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface for Smith Reynolds Airport,
Winston Salem, NC. This action also establishes Class E airspace
designated as an extension to a Class D surface area and amends
verbiage in the description.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, March 21, 2024. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 1 CFR
part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11 and
publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), all
comments received, this final rule, and all background material may be
viewed online at www.regulations.gov using the FAA Docket number.
Electronic retrieval help and guidelines are available on the website.
It is available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11H Airspace Designations and Reporting Points
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. You may also contact the Rules and
Regulations Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority,
as it amends Class D and Class E airspace in Winston Salem, NC. An
airspace evaluation determined that this update is necessary to support
IFR operations in the area.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking for Docket No.
FAA 2023-1899 in the Federal Register (88 FR 67126; September 29,
2023), proposing to amend Class D and Class E airspace extending upward
from 700 feet above the surface for Smith Reynolds Airport, Winston
Salem, NC. Interested parties were invited to participate in this
rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the
FAA. One anonymous comment supporting this action was received. The
commenter also showed concerns about how this airspace action might
affect the environment. The FAA discusses potential environmental
impacts in the Environmental Review section.

Incorporation by Reference

    Class D and Class E airspace designations are published in
Paragraphs 5000, 6004, and 6005 of FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, which is incorporated by reference
in 14 CFR 71.1 annually. This document amends the current version of
that

order, FAA Order JO 7400.11H, dated August 11, 2023, and effective
September 15, 2023. FAA Order JO 7400.11H is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document. These amendments will
be published in the next FAA Order JO 7400.11 update.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11H lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas,
air traffic service routes, and reporting points.

The Rule

    This action amends 14 CFR part 71 by amending Class D airspace for
Smith Reynolds Airport, Winston Salem, NC, by adding an extension from
the 4.2-mile radius of the airport to 5.8 miles northwest of the
airport. The Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface radius is increased to 9 miles (previously 6.6 miles), and all
extensions are removed. Moreover, the action removes REENO NDB from the
airspace description as it has been decommissioned. This action also
establishes Class E airspace designated as an extension to a Class D
surface area from the 4.2-mile radius to 6.5 miles southeast of the
airport. In addition, this action removes the city name from the
airport description header as per FAA Order 7400.2. It replaces Notice
to Airmen with Notice to Air Missions and Airport/Facility Directory
with Chart Supplement in the Class D airspace description. Controlled
airspace is necessary for the safety and management of instrument
flight rules (IFR) operations in the area.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is minimal. Since this is a routine matter that only
affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that
this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5a.
    This airspace action is not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and no extraordinary circumstances
warrant the preparation of an environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11H, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 11,
2023, and effective September 15, 2023, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

ASO NC D Winston Salem, NC [Amended]

Smith Reynolds Airport, NC
    (Lat 36[deg]08'01'' N, long 80[deg]13'19'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
3,500 feet MSL within a 4.2-mile radius of the Smith Reynolds
Airport and 1 mile on each side of the 325[deg] bearing of the
airport, extending from the 4.2-mile radius to 5.8 miles northwest
of the airport. This Class D airspace area is effective during the
specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Air
Missions. The effective date and time will thereafter be
continuously published in the Chart Supplement.
* * * * *

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Designated as an Extension to Class
D or E Surface Area.

* * * * *

ASO NC E4 Winston Salem, NC [Established]

Smith Reynolds Airport, NC
    (Lat 36[deg]08'01'' N, long 80[deg]13'19'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 1 mile on
each side of the 145[deg] bearing from Smith Reynolds Airport,
extending from the 4.2-mile radius of the airport to 6.5 miles
southeast of the airport. This Class E airspace area is effective
during the specific dates and times established in advance by a
Notice to Air Missions. The effective date and time will thereafter
be continuously published in the Chart Supplement.
* * * * *

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASO NC E5 Winston Salem, NC [Amended]

Smith Reynolds Airport, NC
    (Lat 36[deg]08'01'' N, long 80[deg]13'19'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 9-mile radius of Smith Reynolds Airport.
* * * * *

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on November 29, 2023.
Andreese C. Davis,
Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team South, Eastern Service Center, Air
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2023-26557 Filed 12-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P