[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 24, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30025-30027]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12611]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0355; FRL-9303-9]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Placer
County Air Pollution Control District and Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the
Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) and Ventura
County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern
volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from surface coating of metal
parts and products. We are approving local rules that regulate these
emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the
Act).

DATES: This rule is effective on July 25, 2011 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by June 23, 2011. If we receive
such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take
effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2011-0355, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions.
    2. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. http://www.regulations.gov is an
``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If
EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed at http://www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be
publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adrianne Borgia, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3576<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rules did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of these rules?
    C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules?
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
    B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules
    D. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rules did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the rules we are approving with the dates that they
were adopted by the local air agencies and submitted by the California
Air Resources Board (CARB).

                                            Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Local agency                Rule No.              Rule title               Adopted        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PCAPCD............................             245  Surface Coating of Metal             8/20/09         1/10/10
                                                     Parts and Products.
VCAPCD............................           74.12  Surface Coating of Metal              4/8/08         1/10/10
                                                     Parts and Products.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On February 4, 2010, EPA determined that both submittals met the
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be met
before formal EPA review.

B. Are there other versions of these rules?

    There are no previous versions of PCAPCD Rule 245 in the SIP.
    We approved an earlier version of VCAPCD Rule 74.12 into the SIP on
10/25/2005(70FR61561).

C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules?

    VOCs help produce ground-level ozone and smog, which harm human
health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States
to submit regulations that control VOC emissions. Both PCAPCD Rule 245
and VCAPCD Rule 74.12 limit emissions of VOC from the application of
coatings, coating removers (strippers), surface preparation materials,
and cleanup materials in metal parts and products coating operations.
EPA's technical support documents (TSD) have more information about
these rules.

II. EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?

    Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the
Act), must require Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for
each category of sources covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines
(CTG) document as well as each major source in nonattainment areas (see
sections 182(a)(2) and (b)(2)), and must not relax existing
requirements (see sections 110(l) and 193). PCAPCD and VCAPCD regulate
an ozone nonattainment area (see 40 CFR part 81), so PCAPCD Rule 245
and VCAPCD Rule 74.12 must fulfill RACT.
    Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate
enforceability and RACT requirements consistently include the
following:
    1. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and
Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook).
    2. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook).
    3. ``Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and
Plastic Parts Coating,'' EPA-453/R-08-003, September 2008.

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?

    We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and
guidance regarding enforceability, RACT and SIP relaxations. The TSDs
have more information on our evaluation.

C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules

    The TSDs describe additional rule revisions that we recommend for
the next time the local agency modifies the rules.

D. Public Comment and Final Action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully
approving the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all
relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this
approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance.
However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are
simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rules. If we
receive adverse comments by June 23, 2011, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct
final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in
a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive
timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective
without further notice on July 25, 2011. This will incorporate these
rules into the federally enforceable SIP.
    Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct

costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rules,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to
file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed
rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed Rules section of
today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for
judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw
this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.

    Dated: April 25, 2011.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(378)(i)(B) and
(C) to read as follows:

Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (378) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) Placer County Air Pollution Control District.
    (1) Rule 245, ``Surface Coating of Metal Parts and Products,''
amended on August 20, 2009.
    (C) Ventura County Air Pollution Control District.
    (1) Rule 74.12, ``Surface Coating of Metal Parts and Products,''
adopted on April 8, 2008.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-12611 Filed 5-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 231 (Thursday, December 1, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 86770]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28889]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Aviation
Medical Examiners Program

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew a previously approved
information collection. This collection is necessary in order to
determine applicants qualification for certification as Aviation
Medical Examiners (AME's).

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by January 3, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be
addressed to the attention of the Desk Officer, Department of
Transportation/FAA, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronda Thompson by email at:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0604.
    Title: Aviation Medical Examiners Program.
    Form Numbers: FAA Form 8520-2.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the following collection of information
was published on August 25, 2016 (81 FR 58555). There were no comments.
14 CFR part 183 describes the requirements for delegating to private
physicians the authority to conduct physical examinations on persons
wishing to apply for their airmen medical certificate. This collection
of information is for the purpose of obtaining essential information
concerning the applicants' professional and personal qualifications.
The FAA uses the information to screen and select the designees who
serve as aviation medical examiners.
    Respondents: Approximately 450 applicants annually.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 30 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 225 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 23, 2016.
Ronda L. Thompson,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, Performance, Policy &
Records Management Branch, ASP-110.
[FR Doc. 2016-28889 Filed 11-30-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 89 (Monday, May 9, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27510-27512]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09921]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 73

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0074; Airspace Docket No. 20-ANE-5]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of Restricted Areas R-4102A and R-4102B; Fort Devens,
MA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action modifies restricted areas R-4102A and R-4102B at
Fort Devens, MA, by amending the

boundaries of the areas to align with the boundaries of the Fort
Devens' installation property; and by changing the time of designation
to reflect actual usage of the airspace.

DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, July 14, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it establishes restricted area airspace at Fort Devens,
MA, to enhance aviation safety and accommodate essential U.S. Army
training activities.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking for Docket No.
FAA-2021-0074 in the Federal Register (86 FR 17555; April 5, 2021),
proposing to modify restricted areas R-4102A and R-4102B at Fort
Devens, MA, to update the time of designation and the lateral
boundaries of the areas. Interested parties were invited to participate
in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the
proposal. One comment was received from an individual commenter.

Discussion of Comment

    The commenter expressed concern about FAA's determination of ``no
significant impact'' with regard to this action. The commenter likened
it to FAA's decision in the case of Moore Army Airfield in which the
commenter stated the 60 days comment period was waived. Moreover, the
commenter stated that the public lacked the benefit of a noise impact
study. Moore Airfield was closed during the 1990s and is now used for
auto racing and for state police training. Finally, the commenter
stated that they ``disagree with lifting the restrictions that are
currently over Oxbow Wildlife Refuge'' as ``[p]ropeller planes are
dumping noise and leaded aviation fuel emissions.''
    In this case, the Environmental Assessment (EA) and Finding of No
Significant Impact (FNSI) were available for review and comment for 30
days, beginning June 22, 2018, and ending July 23, 2018. Copies of the
EA and Draft FNSI were made available on the official Fort Devens
website and printed copies were also made available at four local
libraries: The Ayer Public Library, the Hazen Memorial Library in
Shirley, the Harvard Public Library, and the Thayer Memorial Library in
Lancaster. The Army received responses from the Massachusetts
Historical Commission and Fitchburg Municipal Airport during the 30-day
public review period. The Army carefully read and considered all
comments received. Moreover, the EA's section on Biological Resources
found that although biological communities are found in the surrounding
areas, no noise impacts are anticipated on these communities because no
changes are proposed to the types of aircraft or types and number of
operations conducted within the airspace.
    With regard to the commenter's final point, the current restricted
area configuration does infringe on the southernmost part of the
Refuge. However, this area is not available for use by the military for
environmental reasons. Therefore, there is no justification for
retaining restricted airspace over that location. Restricted areas are
only designated when necessary to contain and segregate activities that
would pose a hazard to aviation rather than address environmental
concerns. The Oxbow Refuge is identified on Visual Flight Rules (VFR)
aeronautical charts for pilot awareness. An advisory note on the chart
requests that pilots maintain a minimum flight altitude of 2,000 feet
above the ground if overflying the Refuge and similar sensitive areas.

The Rule

    This action amends 14 CFR part 73 by modifying the time of
designation, and the boundaries of restricted areas R-4102A and R-4102B
at Fort Devens, MA. The current time of designation is ``0800 to 2200
Saturday, local time; other times by NOTAM issued 24 hours in
advance.'' This designation does not reflect the actual routine daily
use of the airspace necessary to meet the training requirements at Fort
Devens. The FAA is amending the time of designation to read:
``Intermittent, 0730 to 2200 local time, daily; other times by NOTAM
issued 24 hours in advance.'' This change provides more accurate
information to the aviation community about the current routine use of
the airspace, and it eliminates the administrative workload now
required to issue daily NOTAMs to activate the restricted areas.
    The FAA is also modifying the boundaries of restricted areas R-
4102A and R-4102B by removing sections of the restricted airspace that
are not contained within the Fort Devens installation property
boundaries. Additionally, this rule slightly expands the restricted
areas on the northwest, northeast, and southeast sides to include small
parts of the training area that are actually located within the Fort
Devens installation property boundaries, but are outside of the current
restricted area boundaries. Taken together, these restricted area
boundary changes result in an overall reduction in the size of the
restricted areas at Fort Devens. The result is improved functionality
of the training area as well as increase safety during training
operations.
    During periods when the restricted areas are not needed by the
using agency, the airspace will be returned to the controlling agency
(FAA, Boston Approach Control) for access by other aviation users.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated,
does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this airspace action of modifying
restricted areas R-4102A and R-4102B at Fort Devens, MA, qualifies for
categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and its implementing regulations at 40 CFR part
1500, and in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F,

Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, paragraph 5-6.5a, which
categorically excludes from further environmental impact review
rulemaking actions that designate or modify classes of airspace areas,
airways, routes, and reporting points (see 14 CFR part 71, Designation
of Class A, B, C, D, and E Airspace Areas; Air Traffic Service Routes;
and Reporting Points). As such, this action is not expected to result
in any potentially significant environmental impacts. In accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, paragraph 5-2 regarding Extraordinary
Circumstances, the FAA has reviewed this action for factors and
circumstances in which a normally categorically excluded action may
have a significant environmental impact requiring further analysis.
Accordingly, the FAA has determined that no extraordinary circumstances
exist that warrant preparation of an environmental assessment or
environmental impact study for this rulemaking action. On May 31, 2019,
in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures, Paragraph 8-2, Adoption of Other Agencies' NEPA
Documents, the FAA finalized its adoption Environmental Assessment of
the Army's Establishment of Restricted Area Airspace (R-) 4102A/B at
U.S. Army Garrison Fort Devens, Final Environmental Assessment of
Airspace Change Proposal at U.S. Army Garrison Fort Devens,
Massachusetts. The Army's Final EA analyzed the potential environmental
impacts of the proposed establishment of additional restricted area
airspace in support of the Army's training exercises. The additional
restricted area airspace would lower the risk of encountering non-
participating aircraft during those exercises. No changes to the types
of aircraft or types and number of operations conducted within the
airspace were proposed.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73

    Airspace, Prohibited areas, Restricted areas.

The Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 73 as follows:

PART 73--SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE

0
1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  73.41  Massachusetts [Amended]

0
2. Section 73.38 is amended as follows:

R-4102A Fort Devens, MA [Amended]

    Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 42[deg]31'11'' N, long.
71[deg]38'29'' W; to lat. 42[deg]30'55'' N, long. 71[deg]37'51'' W;
to lat. 42[deg]30'12'' N, long. 71[deg]38'05'' W; to lat.
42[deg]29'38'' N, long. 71[deg]37'41'' W; to lat. 42[deg]28'21'' N,
long. 71[deg]39'14'' W; to lat. 42[deg]28'11'' N, long.
71[deg]39'32'' W; to lat. 42[deg]28'11'' N, long. 71[deg]39'38'' W;
to lat. 42[deg]28'15'' N, long. 71[deg]39'45'' W; to lat.
42[deg]28'25'' N, long. 71[deg]40'08'' W; to lat. 42[deg]28'54'' N,
long. 71[deg]41'00'' W; to lat. 42[deg]29'08'' N, long.
71[deg]41'06'' W; to lat. 42[deg]29'52'' N, long. 71[deg]41'08'' W;
to lat. 42[deg]30'17'' N, long. 71[deg]41'29'' W; to lat.
42[deg]30'19'' N, long. 71[deg]41'19'' W; to lat. 42[deg]30'37'' N,
long. 71[deg]40'30'' W; to lat. 42[deg]30'43'' N, long.
71[deg]40'17'' W; to lat. 42[deg]30'52'' N, long. 71[deg]40'14'' W;
to lat. 42[deg]30'54'' N, long. 71[deg]40'10'' W; to lat.
42[deg]30'53'' N, long. 71[deg]40'02'' W; to lat. 42[deg]30'48'' N,
long. 71[deg]39'57'' W; to lat. 42[deg]30'47'' N, long.
71[deg]39'45'' W; to lat. 42[deg]30'55'' N, long. 71[deg]39'31'' W;
to lat. 42[deg]30'58'' N, long. 71[deg]39'18'' W; to lat.
42[deg]30'57'' N, long. 71[deg]39'09'' W; to lat. 42[deg]30'52'' N,
long. 71[deg]38'42'' W; to lat. 42[deg]30'58'' N, long.
71[deg]38'33'' W; to lat. 42[deg]31'06'' N, long. 71[deg]38'37'' W;
    thence to the point of beginning.
    Designated altitudes. Surface to, but not including, 2000 feet
MSL.
    Time of designation. Intermittent, 0730-2200 local time, daily;
other times by NOTAM issued 24 hours in advance.
    Controlling agency. FAA, Boston Approach Control.
    Using agency. Commander, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Devens, MA.

R-4102B Fort Devens, MA [Amended]

    Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 42[deg]31'11'' N, long.
71[deg]38'29'' W; to lat. 42[deg]30'55'' N, long. 71[deg]37'51'' W;
to lat. 42[deg]30'12'' N, long. 71[deg]38'05'' W; to lat.
42[deg]29'38'' N, long. 71[deg]37'41'' W; to lat. 42[deg]28'21'' N,
long. 71[deg]39'14'' W; to lat. 42[deg]28'11'' N, long.
71[deg]39'32'' W; to lat. 42[deg]28'11'' N, long. 71[deg]39'38'' W;
to lat. 42[deg]28'15'' N, long. 71[deg]39'45'' W; to lat.
42[deg]28'25'' N, long. 71[deg]40'08'' W; to lat. 42[deg]28'54'' N,
long. 71[deg]41'00'' W; to lat. 42[deg]29'08'' N, long.
71[deg]41'06'' W; to lat. 42[deg]29'52'' N, long. 71[deg]41'08'' W;
to lat. 42[deg]30'17'' N, long. 71[deg]41'29'' W; to lat.
42[deg]30'19'' N, long. 71[deg]41'19'' W; to lat. 42[deg]30'37'' N,
long. 71[deg]40'30'' W; to lat. 42[deg]30'43'' N, long.
71[deg]40'17'' W; to lat. 42[deg]30'52'' N, long. 71[deg]40'14'' W;
to lat. 42[deg]30'54'' N, long. 71[deg]40'10'' W; to lat.
42[deg]30'53'' N, long. 71[deg]40'02'' W; to lat. 42[deg]30'48'' N,
long. 71[deg]39'57'' W; to lat. 42[deg]30'47'' N, long.
71[deg]39'45'' W; to lat. 42[deg]30'55'' N, long. 71[deg]39'31'' W;
to lat. 42[deg]30'58'' N, long. 71[deg]39'18'' W; to lat.
42[deg]30'57'' N, long. 71[deg]39'09'' W; to lat. 42[deg]30'52'' N,
long. 71[deg]38'42'' W; to lat. 42[deg]30'58'' N, long.
71[deg]38'33'' W; to lat. 42[deg]31'06'' N, long. 71[deg]38'37'' W;
    thence to the point of beginning.
    Designated altitudes. 2000 feet MSL to 3995 feet MSL.
    Time of designation. Intermittent, 0730-2200 local time, daily;
other times by NOTAM issued 24 hours in advance.
    Controlling agency. FAA, Boston Approach Control.
    Using agency. Commander, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Devens, MA.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 3, 2022.
Scott M. Rosenbloom,
Manager, Airspace Rules and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2022-09921 Filed 5-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 8564]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03953]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Release Certain Properties From All Terms,
Conditions, Reservations and Restrictions of a Quitclaim Deed Agreement
Between City of Leesburg and the Federal Aviation Administration for
the Leesburg International Airport, Leesburg, FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA hereby provides notice of intent to release certain
airport properties 7.28 acres at the Leesburg International Airport,
Leesburg, FL from the conditions, reservations, and restrictions as
contained in a Quitclaim Deed agreement between the FAA and the City of
Leesburg, dated March 23, 1948. The release of property will allow the
City of Leesburg to dispose of the property for other than aeronautical
purposes. The property is located north of the airport, across U.S.
Highway 441. The parcel is currently designated Non Aeronautical Use.
The property will be released of its federal obligations for Commercial
Use. The fair market value of this parcel has been determined to be
$2,200,000.
    Documents reflecting the Sponsor's request are available, by
appointment only, for inspection at the Leesburg International Airport
and the FAA Airports District Office.

DATES: Comments are due on or before March 29, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review at Leesburg International
Airport, and the FAA Airports District Office, 8427 South Park Circle,
Suite 524, Orlando, FL 32819. Written comments on the Sponsor's request
must be delivered or mailed to: Jennifer Ganley, Program Manager,
Orlando Airports District Office, 8427 South Park Circle, Suite 524,
Orlando, FL 32819.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Ganley, Program Manager,
Orlando Airports District Office, 8427 South Park Circle, Suite 524,
Orlando, FL 32819.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Section 125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform
Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21) requires the FAA to provide an
opportunity for public notice and comment prior to the ``waiver'' or
``modification'' of a sponsor's Federal obligation to use certain
airport land for non-aeronautical purposes.

Bart Vernace,
Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, Revision Date 11/22/00.
[FR Doc. 2018-03953 Filed 2-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: December 12, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 238)]
[Notices]
[Page 74496]
[DOCID:fr12de06-44]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-97-000]

Dominion Transmission, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC
Gas Tariff

December 4, 2006.
    Take notice that on December 1, 2006, Dominion Transmission, Inc.
(DTI) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second
Revised Volume No. 1A, the following tariff sheets, to become effective
January 1, 2007:

Third Revised Sheet No. 10.
Third Revised Sheet No. 11.
Third Revised Sheet No. 12.
First Revised Sheet No. 14.
First Revised Sheet No. 19.
First Revised Sheet No. 33.
First Revised Sheet No. 39.
First Revised Sheet No. 49.
First Revised Sheet No. 51.
First Revised Sheet No. 54.
First Revised Sheet No. 55.
First Revised Sheet No. 58.
First Revised Sheet No. 59.
First Revised Sheet No. 62.
First Revised Sheet No. 64.
First Revised Sheet No. 67.
First Revised Sheet No. 68.
First Revised Sheet No. 69.
First Revised Sheet No. 71.
First Revised Sheet No. 72.
First Revised Sheet No. 73.
First Revised Sheet No. 75.
First Revised Sheet No. 81.
First Revised Sheet No. 82.
First Revised Sheet No. 83.
Third Revised Sheet No. 84.
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 86.
First Revised Sheet No. 86A.
First Revised Sheet No. 101.
First Revised Sheet No. 103.
Second Revised Sheet No. 104.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-21061 Filed 12-11-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Run # exh. temp O2 NOx in NOx out NOx CH2O in CH2O out CH2O deg F percent ppm ppm % red ppm ppm % red 1a 556 14.7 112.34 116.06  3.3 16.2 8.84 45.4 5 537 15.1 39.8 44.4  11.6 15.4 9.17 40.5 6 567 14.3 226.4 229.2  1.2 16.2 7.78 52.0 3 451 16.3 7 6.79 3.0 17 12.4 27.1 2 & 7 483 15.8 6.99 7.03  0.6 19.2 12.7 33.9 8 500 15.5 29.9 33.7  12.7 15.6 8.56 45.1 15 559 14.7 139.5 147.4  5.7 17.5 8.98 48.7 14 538 14.5 87.2 92.5  6.1 15.3 8.03 47.5 13 569 14.5 94.4 100.6  6.6 17.7 9.31 47.4 16 557 14.5 162.5 171.2  5.4 17.4 8.63 50.4 10 558 14.6 154.8 162.4  4.9 17 8.23 51.6 9a 548 14.6 132.9 140.6  5.8 17 8.04 52.7 4 518 14.8 321.5 325.04  1.1 14.6 7.8 46.6 8 @ 11 503 15.3 27.63 31.15  12.7 # DIV/ 0! 8 @ 12 508 15.35 30.5 34.24  12.3 16 10.35 35.3 8a 502 15.5 28.76 33.25  15.6 15.8 10.34 34.6 CO in CO out CO C6H6 in C6H6 out C6H6 NMHC in NMHC out NMHC ppm ppm % red ppm ppm % red ppm ppm % red 88.32 26.85 69.6 0.045 0.015 66.7 51.2 58.4  14.1 113.6 38.7 65.9 0.065 0.02 69.2 59.4 86.9  46.3 83.7 30.65 63.4 0.09 0.025 72.2 51.09 56.2  10.0 199.9 71.2 64.4 0.06 0.02 66.7 105.9 97.8 7.6 223.8 69.24 69.1 0.07 0.01 85.7 78.29 78.61  0.4 120.8 41.02 66.0 0.063 0.02 68.3 68.8 84.3  22.5 96.5 31.5 67.4 0.08 0.02 75.0 31.5 31 1.6 101.4 34.5 66.0 0.06 0.02 66.7 56.8 61.4  8.1 86.1 31.7 63.2 0.0825 0.02 75.8 56.9 57.4  0.9 93.6 31.1 66.8 0.09 0.02 77.8 37.7 28.5 24.4 83.8 29.2 65.2 0.07 0.03 57.1 28.35 28.25 0.4 84 30 64.3 0.08 0.02 75.0 31.4 28.5 9.2 78.7 29.73 62.2 0.1 0.03 70.0 48.14 49.49  2.8 118.5 47.5 59.9 # DIV/ 0! 46.22 45.58 1.4 113.6 44.6 60.7 0.09 0.02 77.8 41.2 48.66  18.1 118.5 46.4 60.8 0.08 0.015 81.3 41.43 41.28 0.4 THC in THC out THC ppm ppm % red 957 975  1.9 1026.1 1063.4  3.6 942 953.5  1.2 1861.2 1916.4  3.0 1791.2 1824.8  1.9 1307.2 1298.2 0.7 1034.9 1061.8  2.6 977.7 995.1  1.8 910.5 935.7  2.8 1029.2 1074.2  4.4 964.6 1005.8  4.3 964 1003  4.0 1463.5 1477.6  1.0 1326.2 1375.6  3.7 1311.6 1364.6  4.0 1379.9 1425.7  3.3 Uncontrolled Concentrations of Emissions versus Exhaust Temperature 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540 560 580 degrees F ppm NOx in ppm CH2O in ppm CO in ppm C6H6 in ppm NMHC in ppm THC in ppm Linear ( THC in ppm)

Linear ( CO in ppm)

Linear ( NOx in ppm)

Linear ( C6H6 in ppm)

Linear ( CH2O in ppm) Percent Reduction vs. Oxygen Content  500.00 0.00 500.00 1000.00 1500.00 2000.00 2500.00 3000.00 14 14.5 15 15.5 16 16.5 percent O2 in exhaust Percent reduction corrected to 15%

O2 NOx in ppm NOx out ppm NOx % red CH2O in ppm CH2O out ppm CH2O % red CO in ppm CO out ppm CO % red C6H6 in ppm C6H6 out ppm C6H6 % red NMHC in ppm NMHC out ppm NMHC % red THC in ppm THC out ppm THC % red Linear ( C6H6 % red)

Linear ( CO % red)

Linear ( CH2O % red) Run # exh. temp O2 NOx in NOx out NOx CH2O in CH2O out CH2O deg F percent ppm ppm % red ppm ppm % red 1a 556 14.7 106.90 110.44  3.3 15.42 8.41 45.4 5 537 15.1 40.49 45.17  11.6 15.67 9.33 40.5 6 567 14.3 202.39 204.89  1.2 14.48 6.95 52.0 3 451 16.3 8.98 8.71 3.0 21.80 15.90 27.1 2 & 7 483 15.8 8.09 8.13  0.6 22.21 14.69 33.9 8 500 15.5 32.67 36.82  12.7 17.04 9.35 45.1 15 559 14.7 132.75 140.27  5.7 16.65 8.55 48.7 14 538 14.5 80.39 85.27  6.1 14.10 7.40 47.5 13 569 14.5 87.03 92.74  6.6 16.32 8.58 47.4 16 557 14.5 149.80 157.83  5.4 16.04 7.96 50.4 10 558 14.6 144.97 152.09  4.9 15.92 7.71 51.6 9a 548 14.6 124.46 131.67  5.8 15.92 7.53 52.7 4 518 14.8 310.96 314.38  1.1 14.12 7.54 46.6 8 @ 11 503 15.3 29.11 32.82  12.7 0.00 0.00 # DIV/ 0! 8 @ 12 508 15.35 32.42 36.40  12.3 11.00 11.00 0.0 8a 502 15.5 31.42 36.33  15.6 17.26 11.30 34.6 CO in CO out CO C6H6 in C6H6 out C6H6 NMHC in NMHC out NMHC ppm ppm % red ppm ppm % red ppm ppm % red 84.05 25.55 69.6 0.04 0.01 66.7 48.72 55.57  14.1 115.56 39.37 65.9 0.07 0.02 69.2 60.42 88.40  46.3 74.82 27.40 63.4 0.08 0.02 72.2 45.67 50.24  10.0 256.39 91.32 64.4 0.08 0.03 66.7 135.83 125.44 7.6 258.91 80.10 69.1 0.08 0.01 85.7 90.57 90.94  0.4 131.99 44.82 66.0 0.07 0.02 68.3 75.17 92.11  22.5 91.83 29.98 67.4 0.08 0.02 75.0 29.98 29.50 1.6 93.48 31.80 66.0 0.06 0.02 66.7 52.36 56.60  8.1 79.37 29.22 63.2 0.08 0.02 75.8 52.45 52.92  0.9 86.29 28.67 66.8 0.08 0.02 77.8 34.75 26.27 24.4 78.48 27.35 65.2 0.07 0.03 57.1 26.55 26.46 0.4 78.67 28.10 64.3 0.07 0.02 75.0 29.41 26.69 9.2 76.12 28.76 62.2 0.10 0.03 70.0 46.56 47.87  2.8 124.85 50.04 59.9 0.00 0.00 # DIV/ 0! 48.70 48.02 1.4 120.76 47.41 60.7 0.10 0.02 77.8 43.80 51.73  18.1 129.47 50.70 60.8 0.09 0.02 81.3 45.27 45.10 0.4 THC in THC out THC ppm ppm % red 910.69 927.82  1.9 1043.79 1081.73  3.6 842.09 852.37  1.2 2387.19 2457.99  3.0 2072.17 2111.04  1.9 1428.24 1418.40 0.7 984.82 1010.42  2.6 901.32 917.36  1.8 839.37 862.60  2.8 948.79 990.28  4.4 903.36 941.94  4.3 902.79 939.32  4.0 1415.52 1429.15  1.0 1397.25 1449.29  3.7 1394.31 1450.66  4.0 1507.67 1557.71  3.3 Percent Reduction vs. Exhaust Temperature  60.0  40.0  20.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540 560 580 degrees F %

reduction (

corrected to 15%

O2) NOx % red CH2O % red CO % red C6H6 % red NMHC % red THC % red Linear ( CH2O % red)

Linear ( C6H6 % red)

Linear ( CO % red)

Linear ( THC % red)

Linear ( NMHC % red)

Linear ( NOx % red)