out of control. A CMS is out of control if the zero (low-level),
mid-level (if applicable), or high-level calibration drift exceeds
two(2) times the applicable calibration drift specification in the
applicable performance specification or in the relevant standard, the
CMS fails a performance test audit (e.g., cylinder gas audit), relative
accuracy audit, relative accuracy test audit, or linearity test audit;
or the COMS calibration drift exceeds two times the limit in the
applicable performance specification in the relevant standard. These
records shall be retained for a calendar period of five(5) years
following the date of each out of control CMS period. At a minimum, the
most recent two(2) years of records shall be retained on-site and
on-file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained
off-site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on
computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on microfiche.

6.B.2(p)	Records of Total Process Operating Time During the Reporting
Period

(40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(c)(13)) The owner/operator shall record
the total process operating time during the reporting period for sources
subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. These records shall be retained for a
calendar period of five(5) years following the date of each record. At a
minimum, the most recent two(2) years of records shall be retained
on-site and on-file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be
retained off-site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a
computer, on computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on
microfiche.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.2(q)	Records of the Specific Identification of Each Period of Excess
Emissions and Parameter Monitoring Exceedances (40CFR63.10(b)(1) and
40CFR63.10(c)(8)) The owner/operator shall record the specific
identification (i.e., the date and time of commencement and completion)
of each period of excess emissions and parameter monitoring exceedances,
as defined 40CFR63 Subpart LLL that occurs during startups, shutdowns,
and malfunctions of the affected source and occurs during periods other
than startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions of the affected source. These
records shall be retained for a calendar period of five(5) years
following the date of each exceedance. At a minimum, the most recent
two(2) years of records shall be retained on-site and on-file. Records
for the remaining three(3) years may be retained off-site. Such records
may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks,
on magnetic tape disks, or on microfiche.

6.B.2(r)	Records of CMS Malfunctions, Corrective Actions and Repairs

(40CFR63.10(b)(1), 40CFR63.19(c)(10), 40CFR63.10(c)(11),
40CFR63.10(c)(12) and 40CFR63.10(c)(15)) The owner/operator shall record
the nature and cause of any CMS malfunction (if known), the corrective
action taken or preventive measures adopted and the nature of the
repairs or adjustments to the CMS that was inoperative or out of control
for any CMS required by 40CFR63 Subpart  LLL. In order to satisfy these
recordkeeping requirements and to avoid duplicative recordkeeping
efforts, the owner/operator may use the affected source's Startup,
Shutdown and Malfunction Plan or records kept to satisfy  the
recordkeeping requirements of the Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction
Plan provided that such plan and records adequately address the
recordkeeping requirements this condition. These records shall be
retained for a calendar period of five(5) years following the date of
each malfunction, corrective action and/or repair. At a minimum, the
most recent two(2) years of records shall be retained on-site and
on-file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained
off-site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on
computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on microfiche.

6.B.2(s)	Records of All CMS Measurements Needed to Demonstrate
Compliance With A Relevant Standard

(40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(b)(2)(vii)) The owner/operator shall
record all required measurements needed to demonstrate compliance with
40CFR63 Subpart LLL. To demonstrate compliance with that subpart, the
records shall include, but are not limited to, 15-minute averages of CMS
data, raw performance testing measurements and raw performance
evaluation measurements  that support the data that the owner/operator
is required to report. Where a CEMS is automated and the calculated data
averages do not exclude periods of CEMS breakdown or malfunction, in
lieu of maintaining a file of all CEMS subhourly, the owner/operator
shall retain the most recent consecutive three averaging periods of
subhourly measurements and a file that contains a hard copy of the data
acquisition system algorithm used to reduce the measured data into the
reportable form of the standard. An automated CEMS is defined as a CEMS
that records and reduces the measured data to the form of the pollutant
emission standard through the use of a computerized data acquisition
system. Where the measured data from a CEMS is manually reduced to
obtain the reportable form of the standard, and the calculated data
averages do not exclude periods of CEMS breakdown or malfunction, in
lieu of maintaining a file of all CEMS subhourly measurements, the
owner/operator shall retain all subhourly measurements for the most
recent reporting period. The subhourly measurements shall be retained
for 120 calendar days from the date of the most recent Summary or Excess
Emission Report submitted to the Department The Department, upon
notification, may require the Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville
Plant) to maintain all measurements if it determines these records are
required to more accurately assess the compliance status of the affected
source These records shall be retained for a calendar period of five(5)
years following the date of each measurement. At a minimum, the most
recent two(2) years of records shall be retained on-site and on-file.
Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained off-site. Such
records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer
floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on microfiche.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.2(t)	Reduction of COMS and CEMS Data

(63CFR63.2 and 40CFR63.8(g)(2)) The owner/operator shall for a COMS
reduce all data to 6-minute averages calculated from 36 or more data
points equally spaced over each 6-minute period. Data from CEMS for
measurement other than opacity, unless otherwise specified in a relevant
standard, shall be reduced to one(1)-hour averages computed from four or
more data points equally spaced over each one(1)-hour period, except
during periods when calibration, quality assurance, or maintenance
activities are being performed. During periods when calibration, quality
assurance, or maintenance activities are being performed, a valid hourly
average shall consist of at least two data points with each representing
a 15-minute period. Alternatively, an arithmetic or integrated 1-hour
average of CEMS data may be used. A six(6)-minute period is defined as,
with respect to opacity determinations, any one of the 10 equal parts of
a one(1)-hour period. A one(1)-hour period, unless otherwise defined in
an applicable subpart, is defined as any 60-minute period commencing on
the hour.

6.B.2(u)	Emission Data Units of Measurement

(40CFR63.8(g)(4)) All emission data shall be converted into the units of
measurement of the relevant standard for reporting purposes using the
conversion procedures specified in that standard. After conversion, the
data may be rounded to the same number of significant digits as used in
that standard to specify the emission limit (e.g., rounded to the
nearest 1% opacity).

6.B.2(v)	Use of Monitoring Data Recorded During Periods of Unavoidable
CMS Breakdowns, Out-Of-Control Periods, Repairs, Maintenance Periods,
Calibration Checks and Zero (Low-Level) and High-Level Adjustments
(40CFR63.8(g)(5)) Monitoring data recorded during periods of unavoidable
CMS breakdowns, out-of-control periods, repairs, maintenance periods,
calibration checks, and zero (low-level) and high-level adjustments
shall not be included in any computed data average. If the
owner/operator complies with the requirements of 63.10(b)(2)(vii)(A) or
63.10(b)(2)(vii)(B) (condition 6.B.2(s)), data averages shall include
any data recorded during periods of monitor breakdown or malfunction.

6.B.2(w)	Request to Reduce Frequency of Excess Emissions and CMS
Performance Reports

(40CFR63.10(e)(3)(ii)) Notwithstanding the frequency of reporting
requirements specified in condition 6.B.2(ee), if the owner/operator is
required by a relevant standard to submit Excess Emissions and CMS
Performance Reports and/or Summary Reports on a quarterly (or more
frequent) basis, it may reduce the frequency of reporting for that
standard to semiannual if the requirements of paragraphs (w)(1)  through
(w)(3) are met.

(w)(1) If for one full year (e.g., 4 quarterly or 12 monthly reporting
periods) the affected source's excess emissions and CMS Performance
Reports continually demonstrate that the source is in compliance with
the relevant standard.

(w)(2) The owner/operator continues to comply with all applicable
recordkeeping and monitoring requirements.

(w)(3) The Department does not object to a reduced frequency of
reporting for the affected source.

6.B.2(x)	Recording of CMS Data

(40CFR63.8(g)(3)) The monitoring data obtained from CMS may be recorded
in reduced or nonreduced form (e.g., ppm pollutant and percent O2 or
ng/J of pollutant).

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.2(y)	Content and Submittal Dates for Excess Emissions and CMS
Performance Reports

(40CFR63.8(c)(7), 40CFR63.8(c)(8), 40CFR63.10(c)(5), 40CFR63.10(c)(6),
40CFR63.10(c)(7), 40CFR63.10(c)(8), 40CFR63.10(c)(10),
40CFR63.10(c)(11), 40CFR63.10(c)(12), 40CFR60.10(c)(13), and
40CFR63.10(e)(3)(v)) All Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Reports
and all Summary Reports, if required, shall be delivered or postmarked
by the 30th day following the end of each calendar half or quarter, as
appropriate to the Manager of the Technical Management Section, Bureau
of Air Quality. Written reports of excess emissions or exceedances of
process or control system parameters shall include all the information
as specified in paragraphs (y)(1) through (y)(10). When no excess
emissions or exceedances of a parameter have occurred, or a CMS has not
been inoperative, out of control, repaired, or adjusted, such
information shall be stated in the report.

(y)(1) The reports shall contain the name, title, and signature of the
responsible official who is certifying the accuracy of the report.

(y)(2) The date and time identifying each period during which the CMS
was inoperative except for zero (low-level) and high-level checks.

(y)(3) The date and time identifying each period during which the CMS
was out of control. A CMS is out  of control if the zero (low-level),
mid-level (if applicable), or high-level calibration drift exceeds two
times the applicable calibration drift specification in the applicable
performance specification or in the relevant standard, the CMS fails a
performance test audit (e.g., cylinder gas audit), relative accuracy
audit, relative accuracy test audit, or linearity test audit; or the
COMS calibration drift exceeds two times the limit in the applicable
performance specification in the relevant standard.

(y)(4) The specific identification (i.e., the date and time of
commencement and completion) of each period of excess emissions and
parameter monitoring exceedances, as defined in the relevant
standard(s), that occurs during startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions of
the affected source.

(y)(5) The specific identification (i.e., the date and time of
commencement and completion) of each time period of excess emissions and
parameter monitoring exceedances, as defined in the relevant
standard(s), that occurs during periods other than startups, shutdowns,
and malfunctions of the affected source.

(y)(6) The nature and cause of any malfunction (if known).

(y)(7) The corrective action taken or preventive measures adopted.

(y)(8) The nature of the repairs or adjustments to the CMS that was
inoperative or out of control.

(y)(9) The total process operating time during the reporting period.

(y)(10) All information concerning CMS out-of-control periods, including
start dates, end dates, hours and descriptions of the corrective actions
taken.

6.B.2(z)	Records of Procedures that are Part of a CMS Quality Control
Program

(40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(c)(14)) The owner/operator shall record
all procedures that are part of a quality control program developed and
implemented for CMS subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. The record of
procedures shall be retained for a calendar period of five(5) years
following the origin date of each procedure. At a minimum, the most
recent two(2) years of records shall be retained on-site and on-file.
Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained off-site. Such
records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer
floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on microfiche.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.2(aa)	Summary Report Content Requirements

(40CFR63.10(e)(3)(vi) and 40CFR63.1354(b)(9)) If required to submit a
Summary Report, the owner/operator shall submit one Summary Report for
the hazardous air pollutants monitored at each affected source (unless
the relevant standard specifies that more than one summary report is
required,  e.g., one summary report for each hazardous air pollutant
monitored). The summary report shall be entitled “Summary Report
(Gaseous and Opacity Excess Emission and CMS Performance)” and contain
the information specified by paragraphs (aa)(1) through (aa)(16).

(aa)(1) The company name and address of the affected source.

(aa)(2) An identification of each hazardous air pollutant monitored at
the affected source.

(aa)(3) The beginning and ending dates of the reporting period.

(aa)(4) A brief description of the process units.

(aa)(5) The emission and operating parameter limitations specified in
the relevant standard(s).

(aa)(6) The monitoring equipment manufacturer(s) and model number(s).

(aa)(7) The date of the latest CMS certification or audit.

(aa)(8) The total operating time of the affected source during the
reporting period.

(aa)(9) An emission data summary (or similar summary if it monitors
control system parameters), including the total duration of excess
emissions during the reporting period (recorded in minutes for opacity
and hours for gases), the total duration of excess emissions expressed
as a percent of the total source operating time during that reporting
period, and a breakdown of the total duration of excess emissions during
the reporting period into those that are due to startup/shutdown,
control equipment problems, process problems, other known causes, and
other unknown causes.

(aa)(10) A CMS performance summary (or similar summary if it monitors
control system parameters), including the total CMS downtime during the
reporting period (recorded in minutes for opacity and hours for gases),
the total duration of CMS downtime expressed as a percent of the total
source operating time during that reporting period, and a breakdown of
the total CMS downtime during the reporting period into periods that are
due to monitoring equipment malfunctions, nonmonitoring equipment
malfunctions,  quality assurance/quality control calibrations, other
known causes, and other unknown causes.

(aa)(11) A description of any changes in CMS, processes, or controls
since the last reporting period.

(aa)(12) The name, title, and signature of the responsible official who
is certifying the accuracy of the report and the date of the report.

(aa)(13)  All exceedences of maximum control device inlet gas
temperature limits specified in condition 6.B.12(j).

(aa)(14) All failures to calibrate thermocouples and other temperature
sensors as required by condition 6.B.12(a)

(aa)(15)  The results of any combustion system component inspections
conducted within the reporting period as required by condition
6.B.12(h).

(aa)(16) All failures to comply with any provision of the Operation and
Maintenance plan specified by condition 6.B.10(a).

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.2(bb)	Submission of Only the Summary Report

(40CFR63.10(e)(3)(vii)) If the total duration of excess emissions or
process or control system parameter exceedances for the reporting period
is less than 1% of the total operating time for the reporting period
and CMS downtime for the reporting period is less than 5% of the total
operating time for the reporting period, the owner/operator only needs
to submit the Summary Report and the full Excess Emissions and CMS
Performance Report need not be submitted unless required by the
Department.

6.B.2(cc)	Reduction in the Frequency of Submitting Excess Emissions and
CMS Performance and/or Summary Reports (40CFR63.10(e)(3)(iii)) The
frequency of submitting Excess Emissions and CMS Performance and/or
Summary Reports required to comply with a relevant standard may be
reduced only after  the  owner/operator notifies the Department in
writing of its intention to make such a change and the Department does
not object to the intended change. In deciding whether to approve a
reduced frequency of reporting, the Department may review information
concerning a source's entire previous performance history during the
five(5) year recordkeeping period prior to the intended change,
including performance test results, monitoring data, and evaluations of
the owner/operator conformance with operation and maintenance
requirements. Such information may be used by the Department to make a
judgment about a source's potential for noncompliance in the future. If
the Department disapproves the owner/operator request to reduce the
frequency of reporting, the Department will notify it in writing within
45 calendar days after receiving notice of the owner/operator intention.
The notification from the Department to the owner/operator will specify
the grounds on which the disapproval is based. In the absence of a
notice of disapproval within 45 calendar days, approval is automatically
granted.

6.B.2(dd)	Submission of Both the Summary Report and the Excess Emissions
and CMS Performance Report (40CFR63.10(e)(3)(viii)) If the total
duration of excess emissions or process or control system parameter
exceedances for the reporting period is 1% or greater of the total
operating time for the reporting period, or the total CMS downtime for
the reporting period is 5% or greater of the total operating time for
the reporting period, then owner/operator shall submit both the Summary
Report and the Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Report.

6.B.2(ee)	Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Reports and/or Summary
Reports

(40CFR63.10(e)(3)(i)) For sources subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL
required by that subpart to be monitored by a CMS,  the owner/operator
shall submit an Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Report and/or a
Summary Report to the Department for those CMS. Reports shall be
submitted Semiannually, except when more frequent reporting is
specifically required by a relevant standard and the Department
determines on a case-by-case basis that more frequent reporting is
necessary to accurately assess the compliance status of a source.

6.B.2(ff)	Resumption of the Normal Frequency of Submitting Excess
Emissions and CMS Performance and/or Summary Reports
(40CFR63.10(e)(3)(iv)) As soon as CMS data indicate that a source is not
in compliance with any applicable emission limitation or operating
parameter,  the frequency of reporting for Excess Emissions and CMS
Performance and/or Summary Reports shall revert to the original
submission frequency and  the owner/operator shall submit an Excess
Emissions and CMS Performance and/or Summary Report for the noncomplying
emission points at the next appropriate reporting period following the
noncomplying event. After demonstrating ongoing compliance with the
applicable emission limitation or operating parameter for another full
year, the owner/operator may again request approval from the Department
to reduce the submission frequency of reporting for that standard.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.3(a)	Air Pollution Control and Monitoring Equipment Maintenance
Records

(40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(b)(2)(iii)) The owner/operator shall
record all required maintenance performed on the air pollution control
and monitoring equipment required by 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. At a minimum,
the most recent two(2) years of records shall be retained on-site and
on-file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained
off-site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on
computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on microfiche.

6.B.3(b)	Operation and Maintenance of Air Pollution Control Equipment

(SC Regulation 61-62.70.6(a)(3)(i)(B)) The owner/operator shall maintain
the differential pressure across each dust collector between the
Department approved differential pressure ranges as specified in Tables
1 and 2 of the Air Pollution Control Device Operations and Maintenance
Plan. The differential pressure of each dust collector shall be
monitored and recorded concurrently with visible emission monitoring. If
the differential pressure of a dust collector deviates from the
specified differential pressure range, then the owner/operator shall
perform and record a visual emission observation and a reason for the
deviation from the specified pressure range. If the visual emission
observation exceeds the opacity limit for the source(s) then the
Emergency Response Protocol of the plan shall be followed. All visible
emissions monitoring, inspections, reporting, recordkeeping and
preventative maintenance shall be performed as specified by the Air
Pollution Control Device Operations and Maintenance Plan. If a problem
is found during an inspection of a dust collector, then the inspection
shall be documented and include the date and time of inspection, list
the problem(s) found and the corrective action(s) taken. All records
shall be kept on-file and on-site for a calendar period of five(5) years
from the date of record and made available to Department personnel upon
request.

6.B.3(c)	Records of the Occurrence and Duration of Air Pollution Control
and Monitoring Equipment Malfunctions (40CFR63.10(b)(1) and
40CFR63.10(b)(2)(ii)) The owner/operator shall record the occurrence and
duration of each malfunction of the air pollution control and monitoring
equipment required by 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. At a minimum, the most recent
two(2) years of records shall be retained on-site and on-file. Records
for the remaining three(3) years may be retained off-site. Such records
may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks,
on magnetic tape disks, or on microfiche.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS

(REGULATION APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.4(a)	Recordkeeping Requirement for Regulation Applicability
Determinations

(40CFR63.10(b)(3)) If the owner/operator determines that a stationary
source that emits (or has the potential  to emit, without considering
controls) one or more hazardous air pollutants regulated by any standard
established pursuant to Clean Air Act Section 112(d) or Clean Air Act
Section 112(f) and that stationary source is in the source category
regulated by the relevant standard, but that source is not subject to
the relevant standard (or other requirement established under 40CFR63)
because of limitations on the source's potential to emit or an
exclusion, then the owner/operator shall  keep a record of the
applicability determination on-site and on-file for a calendar period of
five(5) years after the determination, or until the source changes its
operations to become an affected source, whichever comes first. The
record of applicability determination shall also be signed by the person
making the determination and include an analysis (or other information)
that demonstrates why the owner/operator believes the source is
unaffected (e.g., because the source is an area source). The analysis
(or other information) shall be sufficiently detailed to allow the
Department to make a finding about the source's applicability status
with regard to the relevant standard or other requirement. If relevant,
the analysis shall be performed in accordance with requirements
established in 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. Also, if relevant, the analysis
should be performed in accordance with EPA guidance materials published
to assist sources in making applicability determinations under Clean Air
Act Section 112, if any.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (CMS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.5(a)	CMS Performance Evaluations

(40CFR63.8(e)(1)) During the pollutant performance tests required by
conditions 6.B.6(a) through 6.B.6(bb) and at any other time the
Department may require, the owner/operator for an affected source being
monitored by a CMS shall conduct a performance evaluation of that CMS.
Such performance evaluation shall be conducted according to the
applicable specifications and procedures described in conditions
6.B.7(b) through 6.B.7(h) or in the relevant standard.

6.B.5(b)	Notification of CMS Performance Evaluations

(SC Regulation 61-62.1 Section IV(D)(2) and 40CFR63.8(e)(2)) The
owner/operator shall notify the Manager of the Source Evaluation
Section, Bureau of Air Quality in writing of the date of the CMS
performance evaluation simultaneously with the notification of the
pollutant performance test date or at least 60 calendar days prior to
the date the CMS performance evaluation is scheduled to begin if no
pollutant performance test is required. In the event the owner/operator
is unable to conduct the CMS performance evaluation on the date
specified in the notification, it shall notify the Department as soon as
practical by telephone and follow up in writing within 30 calendar days.
Telephone notification shall include a description of the
circumstance(s) causing the cancellation of the CMS performance
evaluation  and a projected date that the evaluation will take place.
The written follow-up report shall include a description of the
condition(s) which prevented the evaluation from being conducted, and
when applicable, what corrective action was performed, or what equipment
repairs were required.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (CMS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.5(c)	Content of CMS Performance Evaluation Test Plan

(SC Regulation 61-62.1 Section IV(C), 40CFR63.8(e)(3)(i) and
40CFR63.8(e)(3)(ii)) Before   conducting a required CMS performance
evaluation, the owner/operator shall develop a site specific CMS
Performance Evaluation Test Plan. The CMS Performance Evaluation Test
Plan shall include the applicable information specified by 6.B.8(c),
evaluation program objectives, an evaluation program summary, the
performance evaluation schedule, data quality objectives and both  an
internal and external QA program. Data quality objectives are the
pre-evaluation expectations of precision, accuracy, and completeness of
data. The internal QA program shall include, at a minimum, the
activities planned by routine operators and analysts to provide an
assessment of CMS performance. The external QA program shall include, at
a minimum, systems audits that include the opportunity for on-site
evaluation by the Department of instrument calibration, data validation,
sample logging and documentation of quality control data and field
maintenance activities.

6.B.5(d)	Submission of CMS Performance Evaluation Test Plan

(SC Regulation 61-62.1 Section IV(B), 40CFR63.8(e)(3)(iii) and
40CFR63.8(e)(3)(iv)) The owner/operator shall submit a site-specific CMS
Performance Evaluation Test Plan to the Manager of the Source Evaluation
Section, Bureau of Air Quality for approval at least 60 calendar days
before a required Pollutant Performance Test or CMS performance
evaluation is scheduled to begin, or on a mutually agreed upon date. The
review and approval of the CMS Performance Evaluation Test Plan by the
Department will occur with the review and approval of the site-specific
Pollutant Performance Test Plan. The Department may request additional
relevant information after the submittal of a plan.

6.B.5(e)	Department Approval of the CMS Performance Evaluation Test Plan

(SC Regulation 61-62.1 Section IV(B) and 40CFR63.7(c)(3)) The Department
will notify the owner/operator of approval or intention to deny approval
of the site-specific CMS Performance Evaluation Test Plan within 30
calendar days after receipt of the original plan and within 30 calendar
days after receipt of any supplementary information. Before disapproving
the plan, the Department will notify the owner/operator of its intention
to disapprove the plan together with a notice of the information and
findings on which the intended disapproval is based and a notice of
opportunity for the owner/operator to present, within 30  calendar days
after it is notified of the intended disapproval, additional information
to the Department before final action on  the plan.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (CMS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.5(f)	Department Failure to Approve or Disapprove a CMS Performance
Evaluation Plan

(SC Regulation 61-62.1 Section IV(B), 40CFR63.8(e)(3)(v) and
40CFR63.8(e)(3)(vi)) In the event that the Department fails to approve
or disapprove a site-specific CMS Performance Evaluation Test Plan
within the time period specified in condition 6.B.7(e) and  the
owner/operator intends to demonstrate compliance using the monitoring
method(s) specified in the relevant standard, it shall conduct the CMS
performance evaluation within the specified  time using the specified
method(s)  in the relevant standard. If the owner/operator intends to
demonstrate compliance by using an alternative to a monitoring method
specified in the relevant standard, it shall refrain from conducting the
CMS performance evaluation until the Department approves the use of the
alternative method. If the Department does not approve the use of the
alternative method within 30 calendar days before the CMS performance
evaluation is scheduled to begin, the CMS performance evaluation
deadlines specified condition 6.B.7(g) may be extended such that the
owner/operator shall conduct the CMS performance evaluation within 60
calendar days after the Department approves the use of the alternative
method. Neither the submission of a site-specific CMS Performance
Evaluation Test Pan for approval, nor the Department’s approval or
disapproval of a plan, nor the Department’s  failure to approve or
disapprove a plan in a timely manner shall relieve the owner/operator of
legal responsibility for compliance with any applicable provisions or
with any other applicable Federal, State, or local requirement; or
prevent the Department from implementing, enforcing or taking any other
action under the Clean Air Act.

6.B.5(g)	Conduct of CMS Performance Evaluations and CMS Performance
Evaluation Dates

(SC Regulation 61-62.1 Section IV(D) and 40CFR63.8(e)(4)) The
owner/operator shall conduct a performance evaluation of a required CMS
during any required  Pollutant Performance Test in accordance with the
applicable performance specification as specified in the relevant
standard and if applicable, SC Regulation 61-62.5 Section IV(D).
Notwithstanding the requirement in the previous sentence, if the
owner/operator for an affected source elects to submit COMS data for
compliance with a relevant opacity emission standard, it shall conduct a
performance evaluation of the COMS as specified in the relevant
standard, before the required pollutant performance test is conducted in
time to submit the results of the CMS performance evaluation as
specified in condition 6.B.7(h). If a Pollutant Performance Test is not
required or the requirement for a Pollutant Performance Test has been
waived, the owner/operator for an affected source shall conduct the CMS
performance evaluation no later than 180 calendar days after the
appropriate compliance date for the affected source as specified in the
relevant standard.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (CMS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.5(h)	Reporting of CMS Performance Evaluation Results

(SC Regulation 61-62.1 Section (F) and 40CFR63.8(e)(5)) The
owner/operator shall furnish the Department with a written report of the
results of the CMS performance evaluation simultaneously with the
results of the Pollutant Performance Test or within 60 calendar days of
completion of the CMS performance evaluation if no pollutant performance
test is required, unless otherwise specified in a relevant standard. The
report of performance results shall contain the applicable information
specified in condition 6.B.8(m) and include the raw data from the CMS
performance evaluation. If the owner/operator uses a COMS to determine
opacity compliance during any required pollutant performance test, it
shall furnish the Department with two(2) or, upon request,  three(3)
copies of a written report of the results of the required COMS
performance evaluation. The copies shall be provided to the Manager of
the Source Evaluation Section, Bureau of Air Quality at least 15
calendar days before the required pollutant performance test is
conducted.

6.B.5(i)	Alternative to the CEMS Relative Accuracy Test

(40CFR63.8(f)(6)(i)) An alternative to the test method for determining
CEMS relative accuracy is  available for affected sources with emission
rates demonstrated to be less than 50% of the relevant standard. The
owner/operator may petition the Department to substitute   the CEMS
relative accuracy test in Section 7 of Performance Specification 2 with
the procedures in Section 10 if the results of a Pollutant Performance
Test or other tests performed demonstrate that the emission rate of the
pollutant of interest in the units of the relevant standard is less than
50% of the relevant standard. For affected sources subject to emission
limitations expressed as control efficiency levels, the owner/operator
may petition the Department to substitute the CEMS relative accuracy
test with the procedures in Section  10 of Performance Specification 2
if the control device exhaust emission rate is less than 50% of the
level needed to meet the control efficiency requirement. The alternative
procedures do not apply if the CEMS is used continuously to determine
compliance with a relevant standard.

6.B.5(j)	Department Rescission of Approval to use the Alternative to the
CEMS Relative Accuracy Test

(40CFR63.8(f)(6)(iii)) The Department will review its permission to use
an alternative to the CEMS relative accuracy test and may rescind such
permission if the CEMS data from a successful completion of the
alternative relative accuracy procedure indicate that the affected
source's emissions are approaching the level of the relevant standard.
The criterion for reviewing the permission is that the collection of
CEMS data shows that emissions have exceeded 70% of the relevant
standard for any averaging period, as specified in the relevant
standard. For affected sources subject to emission limitations expressed
as control efficiency levels, the criterion for reviewing the permission
is that the collection of CEMS data shows that exhaust emissions have
exceeded 70% of the level needed to meet the control efficiency
requirement for any averaging period, as specified in the relevant
standard. The owner/operator for an affected source shall maintain
records and determine the level of emissions relative to the criterion
for permission to use an alternative for relative accuracy testing. If
this criterion is exceeded, then the owner/operator shall notify the
Department within 10 calendar days of such occurrence and include a
description of the nature and cause of the increased emissions. The
Department will review the notification and may rescind permission to
use an alternative and require the owner/operator to conduct a relative
accuracy test of the CEMS as specified in Section 7 of Performance
Specification 2.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (CMS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.5(k)	Content of Petition to use the Alternative to the CEMS Relative
Accuracy Test

(40CFR63.8(f)(6)(ii)) The petition to use an alternative to the relative
accuracy test shall include a detailed description of the procedures to
be applied, the location and the procedure for conducting the
alternative, the concentration or response levels of the alternative
relative accuracy materials, and the other equipment checks included in
the alternative procedure(s). The Department will review the petition
for completeness and applicability. The Department's determination to
approve an alternative will depend on the intended use of the CEMS data
and may require specifications more stringent than in Performance
Specification 2.

6.B.5(l)	PM CEMS Correlation Tests

(40CFR63.1357(a) and 40CFR63.1357(e)) If the owner/operator is
conducting PM CEMS correlation tests (that is, correlation with manual
stack methods) it is exempt from any particulate matter and opacity
standards of 40CFR63 Subpart LLL that are applicable to the Rotary Kiln.
It is also exempt from any permit or other emissions, operating
parameter or other limitation on workplace practices that are applicable
to the Rotary Kiln to ensure compliance with any particulate matter and
opacity standards of 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. The particulate matter and
opacity standards and associated operating limits and conditions will
not be waived for more than 96 hours, in the aggregate, for a
correlation test, including all runs and conditions.

6.B.5(m)	Content and Submission of PM CEMS Correlation Test Plan

(40CFR63.1357(b)) The owner/operator shall develop a PM CEMS correlation
test plan. The plan shall t be submitted to the Department for approval
at least 90 calendar days before the correlation test is scheduled to be
conducted and include the applicable information contained in condition
6.B.8(c) and in (m)(1) through (m)(4) of this condition.

(m)(1) The number of test conditions and the number of runs for each
test condition.

(m)(2) The target particulate matter emission level for each test
condition.

(m)(3) How the operation of the affected source will be modified to
attain the desired particulate matter emission rate.

(m)(4) The anticipated normal particulate matter emission level.

6.B.5(n)	Stack Sampling Team and PM CEMS Correlation Tests

(40CFR63.1357(d)) The stack sampling team shall be on-site and prepared
to perform PM CEMS correlation testing no later than 24 hours after
operations are modified to attain the desired particulate matter
emissions concentrations, unless the correlation test plan documents
that a longer period is appropriate.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (CMS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.5(o)	Department Approval or Disapproval of the PM CEMS Test Plan

(40CFR63.7(c)(3)(i), 40CFR63.7(c)(3)(iii) and (40CFR63.1357(c)) The
Department will review and approve or disapprove the PM CEMS Correlation
Test Plan. The Department will notify the owner/operator of approval or
intention to deny approval of the plan within 30 calendar days after
receipt of the original plan and within 30 calendar days after receipt
of any supplementary information. Before disapproving any PM CEMS
Correlation Test   Plan, the Department will notify the owner/operator
of  its intention to disapprove the plan together with a notice of the
information and findings on which the intended disapproval is based and
a notice of opportunity for the owner/operator to present, within 30
calendar days after it is notified of the intended disapproval,
additional information to the Department before final action on the
plan. If the Department fails to approve or disapprove the PM CEMS
Correlation Test Plan within the specified time period the plan shall be
considered approved, unless the Department has requested additional
information.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.6(a)	Notification of Pollutant Performance Test

(SC Regulation 61-62.1 Section IV(D), 40CFR63.7(b)(1) and
40CFR63.7(b)(2)) For the Pollutant Performance Tests required by
conditions 6.B.8(w) through 6.B.8(bb), the owner/operator shall notify
the Department in writing of its intention to conduct a test at least 60
calendar days before it is initially scheduled to begin. In the event
the owner/operator is unable to conduct the pollutant performance test
on the date specified in the notification, it shall notify the
Department as soon as practical by telephone and follow up in writing
within 30 calendar days. Telephone notification shall include a
description of the circumstance(s) causing the cancellation of the
pollution performance test and a projected retest date. The written
follow-up report shall include a description of the condition(s) which
prevented the evaluation from being conducted, and when applicable, what
corrective action was performed, or what equipment repairs were
required. This notification of delay in conducting the pollutant
performance test shall not relieve the owner/operator of legal
responsibility for compliance with any other applicable provisions of
this part or with any other applicable Federal, State, or local
requirement, nor will it prevent the Department from implementing,
enforcing  or taking any other action under the Clean Air Act.

6.B.6(b)	Submission of Pollutant Performance Test Plan

(SC Regulation 61-62.1 Section IV(B),40CFR63.7(c)(2(iv) and
40CFR63.7(c)(2)(v)) The owner/operator shall submit a site-specific
Pollutant Performance Test  Plan to the Manager of the Source Evaluation
Section, Bureau of Air Quality for approval at least 60 calendar days
before the pollutant performance test or CMS performance evaluation is
scheduled to begin, or on a mutually agreed upon date. The Department
may request additional relevant information after the submittal of the
plan.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.6(c)	Content of the Pollutant Performance Test Plan

(SC Regulation 61-62.1 Section IV(C), SC Regulation 61-62.5 Section
IV(E), 40CFR63.7(a), 40CFR63.7(c)(2)(i), 40CFR63.7(c)(2)(ii),
40CFR63.7(c)(2)(iii) and 40CFR63.1349(a)) Before conducting a required
Pollutant Performance Test, the owner/operator, for  an affected source,
shall develop and submit a site-specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan
for approval to the Manager of the Source Evaluation Section, Bureau of
Air Quality. The Pollutant Performance Test Plan shall include the
applicable information in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(40), a test
program summary,  the  test schedule, data quality objectives and both
an internal and external QA program. Data quality objectives are the
pretest expectations of precision, accuracy and completeness of data.
The internal QA program shall include, at a minimum, the activities
planned by routine operators and analysts  to provide an assessment of
test data precision (i.e. the sampling and analysis of replicate
samples). The external QA program shall include, at a minimum,
application of plans for a test method performance audit during the
performance test. The performance audits consist of blind audit samples
provided by the Department and analyzed during the performance test in
order to provide a measure of test data bias. The external QA program
may also include systems audits that include the opportunity for on-site
evaluation by the Department of instrument calibration, data validation,
sample logging, and documentation of quality control data and field
maintenance activities.

(c)(1) Facility name, address, and telephone number, and name of
facility contact.

(c)(2) Facility permit number and source identification number.

(c)(3) Name, address, and telephone number of the company contracted to
perform the source test.

(c)(4)  Name, address, and telephone number of the laboratory contracted
to perform the analytical analysis of the Pollutant Performance Test
samples.

(c)(5) Description and overall purpose of the tests (i.e. demonstrate
compliance, establish emission  factors).

(c)(6) Citation of any applicable State or Federal regulation or permit
condition requiring the tests.

(c)(7) Description of the process including a description of each phase
of batch or cyclic processes, and the time required to complete each
phase.

(c)(8) Process design rates and normal operating rates.

(c)(9) Proposed operating rate and conditions for the source test.

(c)(10)  Methods including proposed calculations, equations, and other
related information that will be  used to demonstrate and verify the
operating rate during the Pollutant Performance Test.

(c)(11) Description of any air pollution control equipment.

(c)(12) Description of any stack gas or opacity monitoring systems.

(c)(13) Description of all air pollution control monitors (i.e. pressure
gauges, flow indicators, cleaning cycle timers, electrostatic
precipitator voltage meters) when applicable.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.6(c)

(continued)	Content of the Pollutant Performance Test Plan (continued)

(c)(14) A list of process and air pollution control operating parameters
that will be recorded during the tests, the responsible party who will
record these readings, and the frequency at which readings will be
recorded.

(c)(15) Identification of any risks associated with sampling location
and accessibility, toxic releases, electrical hazards, or any other
unsafe conditions, and a plan of action to correct or abate these
hazards.

(c)(16) List of all necessary or required safety equipment including
respirators, safety glasses, hard hats, safety shoes, hearing
protection, and other protective equipment.

(c)(17) Description of sampling and analytical methods to be used.

(c)(18) Number of tests to be conducted and the number of runs
comprising a test.

(c)(19) Duration of each test run.

(c)(20) Description of minimum sampling volumes for each test run.

(c)(21) Location where samples will be recovered.

(c)(22) Explanation of how blank and recovery check results and
analytical non-detects will be used in final emission calculations.

(c)(23) Maximum amount of time a sample will be held after collection
prior to analysis.

(c)(24) Method of storing and transporting samples.

(c)(25) Schematics of sampling sites (include stack dimensions and
distances upstream and downstream from disturbances).

(c)(26) A description of all emission points, including fugitive
emissions, associated with the process to be tested, and when
applicable, the method that will be used to measure or include these
emissions during the Pollutant Performance Test.

(c)(27) Procedure for verifying absence of cyclonic or non-parallel
stack gas flow.

(c)(28) Citation of the QA/QC procedures specified in the EPA Reference
Methods and the EPA Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems, Volume III.

(c)(29) Chain-of-custody procedures and copies of chain-of-custody
forms.

(c)(30) Procedure for conditioning particulate matter filters (before
and after testing).

(c)(31) Procedure for conducting leak checks on vacuum lines, pitot
tubes, flexible bags, orsats, etc.

(c)(32) Equipment calibration frequencies, ranges, and acceptable
limits.

(c)(33) Minimum detection limits of analytical instrumentation.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.6(c)

(continued)	Content of the Pollutant Performance Test Plan (continued)

(c)(34) Names, addresses and responsible persons of all sub-contracting
laboratories and a description of analytical methods to be used,
chain-of-custody procedures and QA/QC measures.

(c)(35) QA/QC measures associated with the collection and analysis of
process or raw material samples and the frequency at which these samples
will be collected.

(c)(36) Methods for interference and matrix effects checks, and number
of replicate analyses.

(c)(37) Methods and concentrations for internal standards (standards
additions prior to extraction).

(c)(38) Methods and concentrations for surrogate standards (standards
additions to collection media prior to sampling).

(c)(39) Methods for recovery checks, field blanks, lab blanks, reagent
blanks, proof rinse blanks and analytical blanks.

(c)(40) Proposed range of recoveries for data acceptability and method
of data interpretation if sample recovery is not within the proposed
range.

6.B.6(d)	Pollutant Performance Test Method Audit Program

(SC Regulation 61-62.1 Section IV(E) and 40CFR63.7(c)(4)) The
owner/operator shall analyze performance audit samples during each
Pollutant Performance Test. The owner/operator shall request performance
audit materials 30 days prior to the test date. Audit materials
including cylinder audit gases may be obtained by contacting the
appropriate EPA Regional Office or the Department. The Department will
have sole discretion to require any subsequent remedial actions of the
owner/operator based on the  performance audit results. If the
Department fails to provide the required performance audit materials to
the owner/operator in time to analyze the performance audit samples
during a performance test, the requirement to conduct a performance
audit is waived for that performance test. Waiver under this condition
of the requirement to conduct a performance audit for a particular
performance test does not constitute a waiver of the requirement to
conduct a performance audit for future required performance tests.

6.B.6(e)	Department Approval of the Pollutant Performance Test Plan

(SC Regulation 61-62.1 Section IV(B) and 40CFR63.7(c)(3)(i)) The
Department will notify owner/operator of approval or intention to deny
approval of the site-specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan within 30
calendar days after receipt of the original plan and within 30 calendar
days after receipt of any supplementary information. Before disapproving
any site-specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan, the Department will
notify the owner/operator of its intention to disapprove the plan
together with a notice of the information and findings on which the
intended disapproval is based and a notice of opportunity for the
owner/operator to present, within 30 calendar days after it is notified
of the intended disapproval, additional information to the Department
before final action on the plan.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.6(f)	Department Failure to Approve or Disapprove a Pollutant
Performance Test Plan

(SC Regulation 61-62.1 Section IV(B),  40CFR63.7(c)(3)(ii) and
40CFR63.7(c)(3)(iii)) In the event that the Department fails to approve
or disapprove the site-specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan within
the time period specified in condition 6.B.8(e) and  the owner/operator
intends to demonstrate compliance using the test method(s) specified in
the relevant standard or with only minor changes to those tests methods,
the owner/operator shall conduct the performance test within the
specified time using the specified method(s). If the owner/operator
intends to demonstrate compliance by using an alternative to any test
method specified in the relevant standard, then it is authorized to
conduct the performance test using an alternative test method after the
Department approves the use of the alternative method when the
Department approves the site-specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan or
after the alternative method is approved. The owner/operator is
authorized to conduct the performance test within 60 calendar days after
it is authorized to demonstrate compliance using an alternative test
method. Neither the submission of a site-specific Pollutant  Performance
Test Plan for approval, nor the Department’s approval or disapproval
of a plan, nor the Department’s failure to approve or disapprove a
plan in a timely manner shall relieve the owner/operator of legal
responsibility for compliance with any applicable provisions or with any
other applicable Federal, State, or local requirement; or prevent the
Department from implementing, enforcing or taking  any other action
under the Clean Air Act.

6.B.6(g)	Pollutant Performance Testing Facilities

(SC Regulation 61-62.1 Section IV(D)(6) and 40CFR63.7(d)) Since the
owner/operator is required to conduct Pollutant Performance Tests, it
shall at the Department’s request provide the applicable performance
testing facilities as specified by paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(6) of
this condition.

(g)(1) Sampling ports adequate for test methods applicable to such
source. This includes constructing the air pollution control system such
that volumetric flow rates and pollutant emission rates can be
accurately determined by applicable test methods and procedures and
providing a stack or duct free of cyclonic flow during performance
tests, as demonstrated by applicable test methods and procedures

(g)(2) Safe sampling platform(s) and/or sites(s)

(g)(3) Safe access to sampling platform(s) and/or site(s).

(g)(4) Utilities for sampling and testing equipment.

(g)(5) Department access to the facility to observe the performance
tests.

(g)(6) Equipment and supplies necessary for the safe testing of a
source.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.6(h)	Conduct of Pollutant Performance Tests

(SC Regulation 61-62.1 Section IV(D)(5) and 40CFR63.7(e)(1)) Unless
approved otherwise by the Department, the owner/operator shall ensure
that Pollutant Performance Tests are conducted while a source is
operating at the maximum expected production rate, other production rate
or operating parameter which would result in the highest emissions for
the pollutants being tested. Examples of the operating parameters that
may effect emission rates are the type and composition of raw materials
and fuels, isolation of control equipment modules, product types and
dimensions, thermal oxidizer combustion temperature and atypical control
equipment settings. Operations during periods of startup, shutdown, and
malfunction shall not constitute representative conditions for the
purpose of a performance test, nor shall emissions in excess of the
level of the relevant standard during periods of startup, shutdown, and
malfunction be considered a violation of the relevant standard unless
otherwise specified in the relevant standard or a determination of
noncompliance is made. Upon request, the owner/operator shall make
available to the Department such records as may be necessary to
determine the conditions of performance tests.

6.B.6(i)	Required Number of Pollutant Performance Test Runs

(40CFR63.7(e)(3)) Unless otherwise specified in a relevant standard or
test method, each Pollutant Performance Test shall consist of three
separate runs using the applicable test method. Each run shall be
conducted for the time and under the conditions specified in the
relevant standard. For the purpose of determining compliance with a
relevant standard, the arithmetic mean of the results of the three runs
shall apply. Upon receiving approval from the Department, results of a
test run may be replaced with results of an additional test run as
specified in paragraphs (i)(1) through (i)(4) of this condition.

(i)(1) A sample is accidentally lost after the testing team leaves the
site.

(i)(2) Conditions occur in which one of the three runs must be
discontinued because of forced shutdown

(i)(3) Extreme meteorological conditions occur.

(i)(4) Other circumstances occur that are beyond the owner/operator
control.

6.B.6(j)	Written Request to Use an Alternative Pollutant Performance
Test Method

(40CFR63.7(f)(1) and 40CFR63.1358(b)(3)) Until authorized to use an
intermediate change, major change or alternative to a performance test
method, the owner/operator remains subject to the test method
requirements of the relevant standard. The owner/operator for a required
Pollutant Performance Test may use an alternative test method from that
specified in a relevant standard provided that it notifies the Manager
of the Source Evaluation Section, Bureau of Air Quality of its intention
to use an alternative test method at least 60 calendar days before the
Pollutant Performance Test is scheduled to begin. In the case of a major
change it shall also notify EPA Region IV. The owner/operator shall use
40CFR63 Appendix A Method 301 to validate the alternative test method.
This may include the use of specific procedures of Method 301 if use of
such procedures are sufficient to validate the alternative test method.
The results of the Method 301 validation process shall be submitted
along with the notification of intention and the justification for not
using the specified test method in the relevant standard. The
owner/operator may submit the information required in this paragraph
well in advance of the 60 calendar day deadline to ensure a timely
review by the Department in order to meet the performance test date
specified in the relevant standard.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.6(k)	Approval of Alternative Pollutant Performance Test Methods

(40CFR63.7(f)(3), 40CFR63.7(f)(5), 40CFR63.7(f)(6) and
40CFR63.1358(b)(3)) The Department or EPA Region IV (in the case of a
major change) will determine whether the owner/operator validation of
the proposed alternative test method is adequate and issue an approval
or disapproval of the alternative test method. A major change to a test
method is a modification to a federally enforceable test method that
uses unproven technology or procedures or is an entirely new method
(sometimes necessary when the required test method is unsuitable). If
the owner/operator intends to demonstrate compliance by using an
alternative to any test method specified in the relevant standard, then
it is authorized to conduct the performance test using an alternative
test method after the Department or EPA Region IV approves the use of
the alternative method. The owner/operator is authorized to conduct the
Pollutant Performance Test within 60 calendar days after it is
authorized to demonstrate compliance using an alternative test method.
Neither the validation and approval process nor the failure to validate
an alternative test method shall abrogate the owner/operator
responsibility to comply with the applicable requirements. If the
owner/operator uses an alternative test method for an affected source
during a required Pollutant Performance Test, it shall continue to use
the alternative test method for subsequent performance tests until
approval is received from the Department or EPA Region IV to use another
test method.

6.B.6(l)	Dispute of the Results Obtained by the Use of an Alternative
Performance Test Method

(40CFR63.7(f) and 40CFR63.1358(b)(3)) If the Department or EPA Region IV
(in the case of a major change) finds reasonable grounds to dispute the
results obtained by an alternative test method for the purposes of
demonstrating compliance with a relevant standard, it  may require the
use of the test method specified in the relevant standard.

6.B.6(m)	Final Written Reporting of Pollutant Performance Test Results

(SC Regulation 61-62.1 Section IV(F) and 40CFR63.7(g)(1)) The
owner/operator shall submit a Final Written Report of the final
Pollutant Performance Test results to   the Department by the close of
business on the 30th day following the completion of the test, unless an
alternative date has been requested in and approved with the
site-specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan prior to testing or is
otherwise specified in a relevant Federal or State standard. The Final
Pollutant Performance Test Report for each site-specific Pollutant
Performance Test Plan shall contain, at a minimum, the applicable
information specified in paragraphs (m)(1) through (m)(19).

(m)(1) Summary of the results.

(m)(2) Emission calculations and emission rates in units of the
applicable standard, permit limit, etc.

(m)(3) Allowable emission rates in units of the applicable standard,
permit limit, etc.

(m)(4) Source compliance status.

(m)(5) Process operating rates.

(m)(6) Methods including actual calculations, equations and other
related information that were used to demonstrate and verify the
operating rate during the performance test.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.6(m)

(continued)	Final Written Reporting of Pollutant Performance Test
Results (continued)

(m)(7) Chain of custody records.

(m)(8) Certification of all reference standards used.

(m)(9) Signature of a responsible facility representative who can verify
process operating rates and parameters.

(m)(10) Legible copies of all raw laboratory data (for example, filter
tare and final weights, titrations, chromatograms, spectrograms,
analyzer measurements, etc.).

(m)(11) Legible copies of all raw field data (for example, strip charts,
field data forms, field calibration forms, etc.).

(m)(12) Legible copies of applicable stack gas or opacity monitoring
system readings identified in the approved site-specific Pollutant
Performance Test Plan.

(m)(13) Legible copies of all applicable process and air pollution
control operating parameter readings identified in the approved
site-specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan.

(m)(14) Results of all calibrations and QA/QC measures and checks
identified in the approved site-specific Pollutant Performance Test
Plan.

(m)(15) Results of performance audits.

(m)(16) Description of any deviations from the proposed process
operations as approved in the site-specific Pollutant Performance Test
Plan during testing.

(m)(17) Description of any deviations from approved sampling
methods/procedures.

(m)(18) Description of any deviations from approved analytical
procedures.

(m)(19) Description of any problems encountered during sampling and
analysis and an explanation of how each was resolved.

6.B.6(n)	Failure of a Pollutant Performance Test

(SC Regulation 61-62.1 Section IV(G)) Within 15 calendar days of  the
submission of a Final  Pollutant Performance Test Report that indicates
non-compliance with a relevant standard, the owner/operator shall submit
to the Department a written plan which includes at a minimum the
information specified by paragraphs (n)(1) through (n)(4) of this
condition.

(n)(1) The interim actions being taken to minimize emissions pending
demonstration of compliance.

(n)(2) The corrective actions that have been taken or that are proposed
to return the source to compliance.

(n)(3) The method that will be used to demonstrate the source has
returned to compliance (i.e. retest and proposed date).

(n)(4) Any changes necessary to update the site-specific Pollutant
Performance Test Plan prior to a retest.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.6(o)	Conduct of Pollutant Performance Tests and Reduction of Data

(40CFR63.7(e)(2), 40CFR63.90 and 40CFR63.1358(b)(3)) Pollutant
Performance tests shall be  conducted and the data obtained from a
Pollutant Performance Test reduced in accordance with the applicable
test methods and procedures unless  the Department or EPA Region IV
determines otherwise as specified by paragraphs (o)(1) through (o)(4) of
this condition.

(o)(1) The Department specifies or approves, in specific cases, the use
of a test method with minor changes in methodology Such changes may be
approved in conjunction with approval of the site-specific Pollutant
Performance Test Plan. A minor change to a test method is defined as a
modification to a federally enforceable test method that does not
decrease the stringency of the emission limitation or standard, has no
national significance (e.g., does not affect implementation of the
applicable regulation for other affected sources, does not set a
national precedent, and individually does not result in a revision to
the test method) and is site-specific, made to reflect or accommodate
the operational characteristics, physical constraints, or safety
concerns of an affected source.

(o)(2) The Department or EPA Region IV approves the use of an
intermediate or major change or alternative to a test method the results
of which the Department or EPA Region IV has determined to be adequate
for indicating whether a specific affected source is in compliance. A
intermediate change to test method is defined as a within-method
modification to a federally enforceable test method involving “proven
technology” (generally accepted by the scientific community as
equivalent or better) that is applied on a site-specific basis and that
may have the potential to decrease the stringency of the associated
emission limitation or standard. Though site-specific, an intermediate
change may set a national precedent for a source category and may
ultimately result in a revision to the federally enforceable test
method. In order to be approved, an intermediate change must be
validated according to 40CFR63 Appendix A Method 301 to demonstrate that
it provides equal or improved accuracy and precision. A major change to
a test method is defined as a modification to a federally enforceable
test method that uses “unproven technology or procedures” (not
generally accepted by the scientific community) or is an entirely new
method (sometimes necessary when the required test method is
unsuitable). A major change to a test method may be site-specific, or
may apply to one or more sources or source categories, and will almost
always set a national precedent. In order to be approved, a major change
must be validated according to 40CFR63 Appendix A Method 301.

(o)(3) The Department or EPA Region IV approves shorter sampling times
or smaller sample volumes when necessitated by process variables or
other factors.

(o)(4) The Department waives the requirement for Pollutant Performance
Tests because the owner/operator for an affected source has demonstrated
by other means to the Department’s satisfaction that the affected
source is in compliance with the relevant standard.

6.B.6(p)	Waiver of a Pollutant Performance Test

(40CFR63.7(h)(1) and 40CFR63.7(h)(2)) Until a waiver of a Pollutant
Performance Testing requirement has been granted by the Department, the
owner/operator for an affected source remains subject to the applicable
performance testing requirements in the relevant standard. Individual
performance tests may be waived upon written application to the
Department if, in its judgment, the source is meeting the relevant
standard(s) on a continuous basis, a source is being operated under an
Extension of Compliance or the owner/operator has requested an Extension
of Compliance and the Department is still considering that request.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.6(q)	Request to Waive Pollutant Performance Tests

(40CFR63.7(h)(3)) If a request is made for an Extension of Compliance,
the application for a waiver of an initial Pollutant Performance Test
shall accompany the information required for the request for an
Extension of Compliance. If no Extension of Compliance is requested or
if the owner/operator has requested an Extension of Compliance and the
Department is s till considering that request, the application for a
waiver of an initial Pollutant Performance Test shall be submitted at
least 60 calendar  days before scheduled date of  the performance test
if the site-specific test Pollutant Performance Test Plan is not
submitted. If an application for a waiver of a subsequent performance
test is made, the application may accompany any required Compliance
Progress Report, Compliance Status Report or Excess Emissions and CMS
Performance but it shall be submitted at least 60 calendar days before
the scheduled date of the performance test if the site-specific
Pollutant Performance Test Plan is not submitted. Any application for a
waiver of a performance test shall include information justifying the
owner/operator request for a waiver, such as the technical or economic
infeasibility, or the impracticality, of the affected source performing
the required test.

6.B.6(r)	Department Approval of the Request to Waive a Pollutant
Performance Test

(40CFR63.7(h)(4) and 40CFR63.7(h)(5)) The Department will approve or
deny a request for a waiver  of a Pollutant Performance Test when it
approves or denies an Extension of Compliance, approves or disapproves a
site-specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan,  makes a determination of
compliance following the submission of a required Compliance Status
Report or Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Report or makes a
determination of suitable progress towards compliance following the
submission of a Compliance Progress Report, whichever is applicable.
Approval of any request to waive a Pollutant Performance Test shall not
abrogate the Department's authority under the Clean Air Act or in any
way prohibit the Department from later canceling the waiver. The
cancellation will be made only after notice is given to the
owner/operator.

6.B.6(s)	Use of a COMS During Pollutant Performance Tests

(40CFR63.6(h)(7)(i) and 40CFR63.10(e)(4)) The owner/operator for an
affected source required to be continuously monitored using a COMS shall
record the monitoring data produced during a Pollutant Performance Test
and shall furnish the Department with a written report of the monitoring
results. The report of COMS data shall be submitted simultaneously with
the Final Written Report of the Pollutant Performance Test Results as
specified in condition 6.B.8(k).

6.B.6(t)	Reduction of COMS Data During a Pollutant Performance Test

(40CFR63.6(h)(7)(iii)) For the purposes of determining compliance with
an opacity emission standard during a required Pollutant Performance
Test using COMS data, the COMS data shall be reduced to six(6)-minute
averages over the duration of the mass emission performance test.

6.B.6(u)	Proper Operation of a COMS During a Pollutant Performance Test

(40CFR63.6(h)(7)(iv)) If the owner/operator uses a COMS for compliance
purposes it is responsible for demonstrating that it has complied with
the CMS performance evaluation requirements, that the COMS has been
properly maintained, operated, and data quality-assured and that the
resulting data have not been altered in any way.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.6(v)	Use of COMS Data in Lieu of 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9
Observations During a Pollutant Performance Test (40CFR63.6(h)(7)(ii)
and 40CFR63.6(h)(7)(v)) Whenever an opacity emission test method has not
been specified in an applicable subpart or  the owner/operator is
required to conduct 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9 observations for an
affected source, it may submit,  for compliance purposes, COMS data
results produced during any required Pollutant Performance Test in lieu
of Method 9 data. If  the owner/operator elects to submit COMS data for
compliance with an opacity emission standard, it  shall notify the
Department in writing of that decision simultaneously with the
notification of the date that a Pollutant Performance Test is scheduled
to begin. Once the owner/operator has notified the Department to that
effect, the COMS data results will be used to determine opacity
compliance during subsequent Pollutant Performance Tests unless the
owner/operator notifies the Department in writing to the contrary no
later than with the notification of the date that a subsequent Pollutant
Performance Test is scheduled to begin. Except as provided in this
condition,  the results of continuous monitoring by a COMS that indicate
that the opacity at the time visual observations were made was not in
excess of the emission standard are probative but not conclusive
evidence of the actual opacity of an emission,  provided that the
owner/operator for an affected source proves that, at the time of the
alleged violation, the instrument used was properly maintained, met
40CFR60 Appendix B Performance Specification 1 and that the resulting
data have not been altered in any way.

6.B.6(w)	Pollutant Performance Test  for Rotary Kiln Dioxin/Furan
Emissions

(40CFR63.7(a)(2), 40CFR63.7(g)(3) and 40CFR63.1349(b)(3)) Within 180
calendar days after June 14, 2002, the owner/operator shall demonstrate
initial compliance with the Rotary Kiln Dioxin/Furan emission limit
specified in condition 5.E.2(q)  by conducting a performance test for
the kiln using 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 23. The owner/operator shall
demonstrate initial compliance by conducting separate performance tests
while the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill is under normal
operating conditions and while the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill
is not operating. Each performance test shall consist of three(3)
separate runs and each run shall be conducted under the conditions that
exist when the Rotary Kiln is operating at the highest load or capacity
level reasonably expected to occur. The duration of each run shall be at
least three(3) hours and  the sample volume for each run shall be at
least 2.5 dscm (90 dscf). The concentration shall be determined for each
run and the arithmetic average of the concentrations measured for the
three(3) runs shall be calculated and used to determine compliance. The
temperature at the inlet to the Rotary Kiln shall be continuously
recorded during the period of the Method 23 test and the continuous
temperature records shall be included in the Final Pollutant Performance
Test Report. One(1)-minute average temperatures  shall be calculated for
each minute of each run of the test. The run average temperature shall
be calculated for each run, and the average of the run average
temperatures shall be determined and included in the performance test
report and will determine the applicable temperature limit for condition
6.B.10(a). Pollutant Performance Tests for Dioxin/Furan emissions shall
be repeated every 30 months from the date  of the previous performance
test. The owner/operator shall conduct each performance test as
specified in this condition and according to conditions 6.B.6( a)
through 6.B.6(v).  A copy of the test results shall also be kept on-site
and on-file for a calendar period of five(5) years from the date testing
was completed and made available to Department personnel upon request.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.6(x)	Pollutant Performance Tests for Changes in Operations that may
Affect Compliance with the   Rotary Kiln Dioxin/Furan Emission Limit
(40CFR63.7(g)(3), 40CFR63.1349(e)(1)) and 40CFR63.1349(e)(3))   If  the
owner/operator plans to undertake a change in operations that may
adversely affect compliance with the Rotary Kiln Dioxin/Furan emission
limit specified in condition 5.E.2(o), then it shall conduct a
performance test and establish new temperature limit(s) within 180
calendar days after  the change. In preparation for and while conducting
a performance test required by   this condition, the owner/operator may
operate under the planned operational change conditions for a period not
to exceed 360 hours. The owner/operator shall submit temperature and
other monitoring data that are recorded during the pretest operations to
the Department. The owner/operator shall provide the Department with a
written notice at least 60 calendar days prior to undertaking an
operational change that may adversely affect compliance with the
Dioxin/Furan emission limit or as soon as practicable where 60 calendar
days advance notice is not  feasible. The written notice shall include a
description of the planned change, the emissions standards that may be
affected by the change and a schedule for completion of the required
performance test, including when the planned operational change period
would begin. The performance test shall be conducted and completed
within 360 hours after the planned operational change period begins. The
owner/operator shall conduct the performance test as specified in this
condition  and according to conditions 6.B.6(a) through 6.B.6(v).  A
copy of the test results shall also be kept on-site and on-file for a
calendar period of five(5) years from the date testing was completed and
made available to Department personnel upon request.

6.B.6(y)	Pollutant Performance Test  for Clinker Cooler PM Emissions

(SC Regulation 62.5 Standard 4 Section XII(A)(2), 40CFR63.7(g)(3),
40CFR63.1349(b)(1)(i)  40CFR63.1349(b)(1)(ii) and
40CFR63.1349(b)(1)(iii)) The owner/operator shall demonstrate compliance
with the Clinker Cooler PM emission limit specified by condition
5.E.3(a) by conducting a performance test using 40CFR60 Appendix A
Method 5. Each performance test shall consist of three(3) separate runs
under the conditions that exist when the Clinker Cooler is operating  at
the representative performance conditions in accordance with condition
6.B.8(h). Each run shall be conducted for at least one(1) hour and the
minimum sample volume shall be 0.85 dscm (30 dscf). The average of the
three runs shall be used to determine compliance. A determination of the
PM collected in the impingers (“back half”) of the Method 5
particulate sampling train is not required to demonstrate initial
compliance with the PM standards of this subpart. However, this shall
not preclude the Department from requiring a determination of the "back
half" for other purposes. Suitable methods shall be used to   determine
the kiln or inline kiln/raw mill feed rate, except for fuels, for each
run and the emission rate (E) of PM shall be computed for each run using
Equation 1 of condition 6.B.6(z).  Pollutant Performance Tests for PM
emissions from the Clinker Cooler shall be repeated every 24 months from
the date of the previous performance test. The owner/operator shall
conduct each performance test according to conditions 6.B.6(a)  through
6.B.6(v).  A copy of the test results shall also be kept on-site and
on-file for a calendar period of five(5) years from the date testing was
completed and made available to Department personnel upon request.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.6(z)	Pollutant Performance Test for Rotary Kiln PM Emissions

(SC Regulation 61-62.5 Standard 3 Section VIII(D)(7), SC Regulation 62.5
Standard 4 Section XII(A)(2), 40CFR63.1349(b)(1)(i),
40CFR63.1349(b)(1)(ii), 40CFR63.1349(b)(1)(iii) and
40CFR63.1349(b)(1)(v)  and 63.1349(e)(2)) The owner/operator shall
demonstrate compliance with the Rotary Kiln PM emission limit specified
by condition 5.E.2(c) by conducting separate performance tests using
40CFR60 Appendix A Method 5 while the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw
mill is under normal operating conditions and while the raw mill of the
in-line kiln/raw mill is not operating. Each performance test shall
consist of three(3) separate runs under  the conditions that exist when
the Rotary Kiln is operating at the representative performance
conditions in accordance with condition 6.B.8(h). Each run shall be
conducted for at least one(1) hour and the minimum sample volume shall
be 0.85 dscm (30 dscf). The average of the three runs shall be used to
determine compliance. A determination of the PM collected in the
impingers (“back half”) of the Method 5 particulate sampling  train
is not required to demonstrate initial compliance with the PM standards
of this subpart. However, this shall not preclude the Department from
requiring a determination of the “back half” for other purposes.
Suitable methods shall be used to determine the kiln feed rate, except
for fuels, for each run and the emission rate of PM shall be computed
for each run using Equation 1. The opacity exhibited during the period
of the required Method 5 performance tests shall be determined through
the use of a COM. The maximum six-minute average opacity during the
three Method 5 test runs shall be determined during each Method 5 test
run, and used to demonstrate initial compliance with the applicable
visible emission limits. Pollutant Performance tests for PM emissions
from the Rotary Kiln shall be repeated every 24 months from the date of
the previous performance test. If the owner/operator plans to undertake
a change in operations that may adversely affect compliance with the PM
emission limit  then it shall conduct a performance test within 180
calendar days after  the change. The owner/operator shall conduct each
performance test as specified in this condition and according to
conditions  6.B.6(a) through 6.B.6(v). A copy of the test results shall
also be kept on-site and on-file for a calendar period of five(5) years
from the date testing was completed and made available to Department
personnel upon request.

(1) E = ((Cs)(Qsd))/P

E = Emission rate of particulate matter, kg/Mg of kiln feed.

Cs = Concentration of PM, kg/dscm.

Qsd = volumetric flow rate of effluent gas, dscm/hr.

P = total kiln feed (dry basis), Mg/hr.

6.B.6(aa)	Additional Performance Testing

(40CFR63.7(a)(3)) The Department reserves the right to require
performance testing on any source within the owner/operator that it
deems to be necessary. This includes all sources for which a particulate
matter emission limit has been specified and there exists an accurate
and approved  EPA method for determining particulate matter emissions.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.6(bb)	Pollutant Performance Test for Rotary Kiln and Precalciner
Coal Mill SO2, NOx, CO,  HCl,  Ni, Cd, Cr, As and Pb Emissions (SC
Regulation 61-62.5 Standard 3 Section VIII(D)(7), SC Regulation 62.5
Standard 4 Section XII(A)(2) and SC Regulation 61-62.5 Standard 7(m)(2))
The owner/operator shall demonstrate compliance with the emission limits
in Table 5.27  and 5.29 by conducting a Pollutant Performance Test for
SO2, NOx, CO,  HCl, Ni, Cd, Cr, As and Pb emissions from the Rotary
Kiln. The performance test shall be conducted on the kiln stack and
precalciner coal mill stack concurrently for both the vertical spindle
mill on and off modes. The performance test shall also be performed at
the maximum percent kiln gas volume. Rotary Kiln fuels used during the
performance test shall be selected to result in the worst case emissions
(i.e. use the most polluting fuels). The Pollutant Performance Test for
SO2, NOx, CO, HCl, Ni, Cd, Cr, As and Pb emissions from the Rotary Kiln
shall be repeated every 24 months from the date of the previous test.
The owner/operator shall conduct each performance test according to
conditions 6.B.68(a) through 6.B.6(v).  A copy of the test results shall
also be kept on-site and on-file for a calendar period of five(5) years
from the date testing was completed and made available to Department
personnel upon request.

6.B.6(cc)	Initial Pollutant Performance Test for Visible Emissions from
Sources Subject to 40CFR63.1348

(40CFR63.7(a)(2)(iii), 40CFR63.1349(b)(2) and 40CFR63.1349(c)) Within
180 calendar days after a new source becomes subject to 40CFR63.1348 and
within 180 calendar days after June 14, 2002 for the sources listed in
Tables 6.16 through 6.23, the owner/operator shall conduct an initial
Pollutant Performance Test for visible emissions from that equipment. If
the Storage A Frame is still being used to store clinker on June 10,
2003, the owner/operator shall conduct an initial Pollutant Performance
Test for visible emissions from within 180 calendar days from June 10,
2003. If the Storage A Frame begins storing clinker anytime after June
10, 2003, the owner/operator shall conduct an initial Pollutant
Performance Test for visible emissions within 180 calendar days of the
date that clinker was stored. The initial performance test shall be
conducted in accordance with 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9 and under the
conditions that exist when the affected sources are operating at the
highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum
six(6)-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be
used to determine  whether an affected source is in initial compliance
with the relevant standard. The duration of the Method 9 test shall be
three(3) hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the test duration
may be reduced to one(1)- hour if there are no individual readings
greater than 10% opacity and no more than three readings of 10% for the
first one(1)-hour period. The owner/operator shall conduct each
performance test according to conditions 6.B.6( a) through 6.B.6(v). A
copy of the test results shall also be kept on-site and on-file for a
calendar period of five(5) years from the date testing was completed and
made available to Department personnel upon request. This Method 9 test
shall be repeated every 60 months from the date that the previous Method
9 test was completed.

6.B.6(dd)	Pollutant Performance Test for Rotary Kiln and Precalciner
Coal Mill NOx Emissions

(SC Regulation 62.5 Standard 4 Section XII(A)(2), SC Regulation 61-62.5
Standard 7(m)(2), SC Regulation 61-62.99 Subpart B Section 99.44(b)(1)
and SC Regulation 61-62.99 Subpart B Section 99.44(c)(3)) The
owner/operator shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable NOx
emission limit by conducting a Pollutant Performance Test   for NOx
emissions from the Rotary Kiln. The performance test shall be conducted
on the kiln stack and precalciner coal mill stack concurrently for both
the vertical spindle mill on and off  modes. The performance test shall
also be performed at the maximum percent kiln gas volume. Rotary Kiln
fuels used during the performance test shall be selected to result in
the worst case emissions (i.e. use the most polluting fuels). The
Pollutant Performance Test for NOx emissions from the Rotary Kiln shall
be repeated every 12 months from the date of the previous test. The
owner/operator shall conduct each performance test according to
conditions 6.B.6(a) through 6.B.6(v). A copy of the test results shall
also be kept on-site and on-file for a calendar period of five(5) years
from the date testing was completed and made available to Department
personnel upon request.

6.B.6 (ee)	(In-Line Kiln/Raw Mill #1 and Precalciner Coal Mill (PCM),
associated with Kiln #1)  Within 180 days after the new BACT limit of
0.55 lb/ton of clinker comes into effect, the owner/operator shall
conduct a performance test of the I-line Kiln/Raw Mill #1PCM, and its
associated air pollution control devices in order to verify and record
the non-methane VOC emission rate.  Thereafter, subsequent tests shall
be performed at least every 30 months for non-methane VOCs following the
initial test, and at such other times as may be required by the Bureau
of Air Quality (BAQ) under section 114 of the Clean Air Act.  Method 18
and 25A for the VOC emission limit.  The source tests shall be conducted
while the facility is operating at the maximum expected production rate
or other production rate or operating parameter, which would result in
the highest emissions for the pollutants being tested. Source tests
conducted under any other conditions may result in production
limitations. The owner or operator shall ensure that the source tests
are conducted in accordance with requirements listed in SC Regulation
61-62.1, Section IV, Source Tests.  The Bureau must be notified at least
60 days prior to any source test so that a Bureau representative may be
present.  Source test methodology must be approved by this Bureau.

Nothing in this paragraph is intended or operates to preclude
modification to or relief from the source test requirements in this
Permit where otherwise authorized by S.C. Code Ann. R. 61-62.1, Section
IV.

TABLE 6.16 SOURCES REQUIRING A POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TEST FOR VISIBLE
EMISSIONS

(UNIT ID 02 KILN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT)

Equip ID	Source Description

4130000	Raw Mill Feed Belt Conveyor

4132000	Vertical Raw Mill Feed Bin

6101000	Four Stage Preheater

6101020	Precalciner

6129030	2 Clinker Cooler Product Recovery Cyclones

4160000	Four Vertical Raw Mill Cyclones

4127000	Pulverized Ash Silo

4003040	Marl Silo No.2

5001000	Blend Silo

4127000	Raw Meal FK Pump

4172020	Pneumatic Piping to Blend Silo

5003010	Blend Silo Airslides

5002000	Kiln Feed Silo

5026000	Raw Meal CP Transfer Pump

5014090	Pneumatic Transfer Piping to Kiln Feed Silo

5016030	Kiln Feed Silo Airslides

5019000	Kiln Feed Elevator

5018000	Kiln Feed Bin

TABLE 6.17 SOURCES REQUIRING A POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TEST FOR VISIBLE
EMISSIONS

(UNIT ID 03 CLINKER HANDLING EQUIPMENT)

Equip ID	Source Description

6125000	Clinker Cooler Heat Exchanger

6125130	Clinker Cooler Screw Conveyors

6133000	Fredenhagen Clinker Conveyor

6138000

6139000

6140000	3 Clinker Elevators

7003010	Clinker Silo No.1

7005010	Clinker Silo No.2

TABLE 6.18 SOURCES REQUIRING A POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TEST FOR VISIBLE
EMISSIONS

(UNIT ID 03 CLINKER HANDLING EQUIPMENT)

Equip ID	Source Description

7103010	Clinker Silo No.21

7105010	Clinker Silo No.22

4001020	Clinker Silo No.31

4002020	Clinker Silo No.32

7003000	Clinker Silo No.1 Belt Transfer Feed

7005000	Clinker Silo No.2 Belt Transfer Feed

7103000	Clinker Silo No.21 Belt Transfer Feed

7105000	Clinker Silo No.22 Belt Transfer Feed

4001000	Clinker Silo No.31 Belt Transfer Feed

4002000	Clinker Silo No.32 Belt Transfer Feed

6134000	Reclaim Crusher

6156000	Fringe Clinker Silo

7101000	Fringe Clinker Silo Belt Transfer Feed

TABLE 6.19 SOURCES REQUIRING A POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TEST FOR VISIBLE
EMISSIONS

(UNIT ID 04 FINISH MILL SYSTEM EQUIPMENT)

Equip ID	Source Description

2126000	2 Gypsum Silos

7007000	Gypsum Silo Feed Belt Transfer No.1

7107000	Gypsum Silo Feed Belt Transfer No.2

4007000	Gypsum Silo Feed Belt Transfer No.3

7007010	Synthetic Gypsum Silo Feed Belt Transfer No.1

7107010	Synthetic Gypsum Silo Feed Belt Transfer No.2

4008000	Synthetic Gypsum Hopper/Feed Belt Transfer No.3

7006000	Outside Clinker No.1/Belt Transfer

7106000	Outside Clinker No.2/Belt Transfer

7006010

7106010	Clinker Reclaim Bin

7014000	Finish Mill No.1

TABLE 6.20 SOURCES REQUIRING A POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TEST FOR VISIBLE
EMISSIONS

(UNIT ID 04 FINISH MILL SYSTEM EQUIPMENT)

Equip ID	Source Description

7041000	No.1 Mill Cement FK Pump

7029000	No.1 Mill Separator

7037000	No.1 Mill  Cement After Cooler

7021000	No.1 Mill Material Transfer

7019000	Finish Mill No.1 Bucket Elevator

7114000	Finish Mill No.2

7141000	No.2 Mill Cement FK Pump

7137000	No.2 Mill Cement After Cooler

7123000	No.2 High Efficiency Separator

7118000	No.2 Material Transfer

7119000	Finish Mill No.2 Bucket Elevator

4014000	Finish Mill No.3

4036000	No.3 Mill Cement FK Pump

4050000	No.3 Material Transfer

4052000	No.3 High Efficiency Separator

4020000	2 Finish Mill No.3 Bucket Elevators

TABLE 6.21 SOURCES REQUIRING A POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TEST FOR VISIBLE
EMISSIONS

(UNIT ID 05 CEMENT LOADOUT EQUIPMENT)

Equip ID	Source Description

8103000	Marl Silo No.3

2126000	Marl Fringe Bin

8112000	Marl Silo No.12

8109000	Marl Silo No.4

8011000	Cement Loadout No.3

8017000	Cement Silos Nos. 1-11

8001000	Cement Silo No.13

TABLE 6.22 SOURCES REQUIRING A POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TEST FOR VISIBLE
EMISSIONS

(UNIT ID 05 CEMENT LOADOUT EQUIPMENT)

Equip ID	Source Description

4036040

7141030	Pneumatic Transfer Piping to Cement Silos

8011010	Cement Silo Aeration Units

8214000	Bagged Cement Cleaning Station

8125000	 Cement Packhouse Airslide

8131000	Mixer

8135000	Mixer Discharge Hopper

8142010	Packer Screw Conveyor

8137000	Packer Elevator

8138000	2 Vibrating Screens

8139000	Packer Hopper

8141000	Haver Packer

8142020	Waste Screw Conveyor

8011000	North Scale Cement Loading System

8011040	Airslide System to North Scale Loading Spout

8011060	North Scale Loading Spout (Truck)

8017000	Center Scale Loading System

8017040	Airslide System to Center Scale Loading Spout

8017090	Center Scale Loading Spout (Truck-Rail)

8023000	South Scale Cement Loading System

8023040	Airslide System to South Scale Loading Spout

8023090	South Scale Loading Spout (Truck-Rail)

TABLE 6.23 SOURCES REQUIRING A POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TEST FOR VISIBLE
EMISSIONS

(UNIT ID 06 MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES)

Equip ID 	Source Description

6175000	Storage A Frame

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS

(PERIODIC VISIBLE EMISSIONS MONITORING OF SOURCES SUBJECT TO
40CFR63.1348)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.7(a)	Visible Emissions Monitoring of the Sources Subject to
40CFR63.1348 After Initial Visible Emissions Test has been Completed
(40CFR63.1350(a)(4)) After the initial visible emissions test required
by condition 6.B.6(cc) is complete, the owner/operator shall monitor the
new sources and the sources listed in Tables 6.16 through 6.26 for
visible emissions by conducting while the affected sources  are in
operation, a monthly one(1)-minute visible emissions test in accordance
with 40CFR60 Appendix A  Method 22 and follow the procedure specified in
paragraphs (a)(1)  through (a)(4) of this condition. This monitoring
shall include the Storage A Frame if it is being used to store clinker.
If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the
owner/operator shall conduct a six(6)-minute test of opacity in
accordance with 40CFR60 Appendix A  Method 9. The Method 9 test shall
begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. The
requirement to conduct Method 22 visible emissions monitoring does not
apply to any totally enclosed conveying system transfer point,
regardless of the location of the transfer point. At totally enclosed
conveying system transfer point is defined as a conveying system
transfer point that is enclosed on all sides, top, and bottom. All
Method 22 and Method 9 visible observations shall be documented and
recorded in a log. This log shall include the date and time of each
Method 22 test, if applicable the date and time of the Method 9 test,
whether any Method 22 emissions were observed and if applicable the
Method 9 opacity of the visible emissions. If Method 22 visible
emissions are observed then the time the corrective actions specified in
the operations and maintenance plan were initiated shall also be
recorded in the log. This log shall be kept on-site and all entries kept
for a calendar period of five(5) years from the date of log entry.

(a)(1) If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly
tests for any affected source, the owner/operator may decrease the
frequency of testing from monthly to semiannually for that affected
source. If visible emissions are observed during any semiannual test,
then testing of that affected source shall resume on a monthly basis and
that schedule maintained until no visible emissions are observed in six
consecutive monthly tests.

(a)(2) If no visible emissions are observed during the semiannual test
for any affected source, the owner/operator may decrease the frequency
of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If
visible emissions are observed during any annual test, then testing of
that affected source shall resume on a monthly basis and that schedule
maintained until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive
monthly tests.

(a)(3) If any partially enclosed or unenclosed conveying system transfer
point is located in a building, the owner/operator has the option to
conduct a Method 22 test according to the requirements of paragraphs
(a)(1) and (a )(2) of this condition for each such conveying system
transfer point located within the building, or for the building itself.

(a)(4) If visible emissions from a building are monitored, the
requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this condition apply to
the monitoring of the building. In addition to the requirements of
paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) , the owner/operator shall also test
visible emissions from each side, roof and vent of the building for at
least 1 minute. The test must be conducted under normal operating
conditions.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS

(PERIODIC VISIBLE EMISSIONS MONITORING OF SOURCES SUBJECT TO
40CFR63.1348)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.7(b)	Visible Emissions Monitoring of a Finish Mill’s Sweep and Air
Separator PMCD After the Initial   Visible Emissions Test  has been
Completed (40CFR63.1350(e))  After the initial visible emissions  test
required  by condition 6.B.6(cc) is complete, the owner/operator for
each Finish Mill shall  monitor opacity by conducting daily visual
emissions observations of the mill sweep and air separator PMCD in
accordance with the procedures of 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 22. The
Method 22 monitoring shall be conducted while the affected source is
operating at normal operating conditions. The duration of the Method 22
test shall be 6 minutes. If visible emissions are observed during any
Method 22 test, the owner/operator shall initiate, within one(1)-hour,
the corrective actions specified in the site specific Operations and
Maintenance Plan. Within 24 hours of the end of the Method 22 test in
which visible emissions were observed, the owner/operator shall conduct
a followup Method 22 test of each stack from which visible emissions
were observed during the previous Method 22 test. If visible emissions
are observed during the followup Method 22 test from any stack from
which visible emissions were observed during the previous Method 22
test, the  owner/operator shall conduct a visual opacity test of each
stack from which emissions were observed during the follow up Method 22
test in accordance with 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9. The duration of the
Method 9 test shall be 30 minutes. All Method 22 and Method 9 visible
observations shall be documented and recorded in a log. This log shall
include the date and time of each Method 22 test, if applicable the date
and time of the Method 9 test, whether any Method 22 emissions were
observed and if applicable the Method 9 opacity of the visible
emissions.  If Method 22 visible emissions are observed then the time
the corrective actions specified in the operations and maintenance plan
were initiated shall also be recorded in the log. This log shall be kept
on-site and all entries kept for a calendar period of five(5) years from
the date of log entry.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS

(WRITTEN OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.8(a)	40CFR63 Subpart LLL Written Operations and Maintenance Plan

(40CFR63.1350(a) and 40CFR63.1350(b)) When a source becomes subject  to
the applicable provisions of 40CFR63 Subpart LLL, the owner/operator
shall prepare for that  source a written operations and maintenance
plan. Each source’s plan shall be submitted to the Department for
review and approval no later than 180 days after the source becomes
subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL unless the source already has a
Department approved plan. Each plan shall include the applicable
information listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(4) of this
condition. Failure to comply with any provision of the operations and
maintenance plan shall be a violation of the standard.

(a)(1) Procedures to be used during an inspection of the components of
the combustion system of the Rotary Kiln at least once per year as
specified by condition 6.B12(h).

(a)(2) The corrective actions to be taken when required by conditions
6.B.9(a) and 6.B.9(b).

(a)(3) Procedures for proper operation and maintenance of the affected
source and air pollution control         devices in order to meet the
emission limits and operating limits of 40CFR63.1343 through
40CFR63.1348.

(a)(4) Procedures to be used to periodically monitor affected sources
subject to opacity standards under 40CFR63.1346 and 40CFR63.1348. Such
procedures shall include the provisions of condition 6.B.9(a).

MONITORING AND REPORTING (UNIT ID 01 QUARRY/RAW MATERIAL HANDLING
EQUIPMENT)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.9(a)	Conveying Saturated and Unsaturated Materials Using the 2
Mobile Marl Conveyors

(40CFR60.672(b), 40CFR60.672(h) and 40CFR60.676(g)) If the
owner/operator subsequently conveys unsaturated materials on one or all
of the Marl Conveyors which normally convey saturated materials it shall
submit a report of this change within 30 days following such change to
the Department. The effected mobile conveyor is then subject to the 10%
opacity limit specified in 40CFR60.672(b) and the emission test
requirements of 40CFR60.11. Likewise, if owner/operator conveys
saturated materials on one or both of the 2 Mobile Marl Conveyors that
normally conveys unsaturated material, it shall submit a report of this
change within 30 days following such change to the Department and EPA
Region 4. The affected mobile conveyor is then subject to the no visible
emission limit specified in 40CFR60.672(h).

6.B.9(b)	Quarry Equipment Inspections of Quarry Equipment Processing
Unsaturated Materials

(40CFR70.6(a))  If a quarry conveyor belt or quarry crusher processes
unsaturated materials then the owner/operator shall conduct weekly
equipment inspections and perform maintenance as necessary. All
inspections shall be documented if any problems are found. This
documentation shall include the date and time of inspection, the
equipment type and its identification, clearly identify any problems(s)
and list the corrective action(s) taken. All documented inspections
shall be kept on-site and on-file for a calendar period of five(5) years
from the date of inspection and made available to Department personnel
upon request.

6.B.9(c)	Quarry Equipment Like for Like Replacements

(40CFR60.670(d) and 40CFR60.676(a)) If  the owner/operator replaces  a
piece of quarry equipment that is subject to the provisions of 40CFR60
Subpart OOO with a piece of equipment of equal or lesser size than the
original piece, the replacement piece is exempt from the initial source
test requirements as outlined in 40CFR60.672. owner/operator shall also
submit to the Department, the information contained in paragraphs (c)(1)
 through (c)(4) of this condition. The replacement piece of equipment is
still subject to the opacity or no visible emission standards as
applicable. If the entire production line is replacement then source
testing must be conducted as specified in 40CFR60.672.

(c)(1) For a crusher, grinding mill, bucket elevator, bagging operation,
or enclosed truck or railcar loading station the rated capacity in tons
per hour of the existing facility being replacement and the rated
capacity in tons per hour of the replacement equipment.

(c)(2) For a screening operation the total surface area of the top
screen of the existing screening operation being replacement and the
total surface area of the top screen of the replacement screening
operation.

(c)(3) For a conveyor belt the width of the existing belt being
replacement and the width of the replacement conveyor belt.

(c)(4) For a storage bin the rated capacity in tons of the existing
storage bin being replacement and the rated capacity in tons of
replacement storage bins.

MONITORING AND REPORTING (UNIT ID 01 QUARRY/RAW MATERIAL HANDLING
EQUIPMENT)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.9(d)	Visible Emission Monitoring of Quarry Equipment Processing
Unsaturated Materials

(SC Regulation 61-62.70.6(a)(3)(i)(B)) If a quarry conveyor belt or
quarry crusher processes unsaturated materials then the owner/operator
shall monitor for visible emissions by conducting while the affected
source(s) are in operation a weekly visible emissions test in accordance
with 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9, 40CFR60.675(c) and 40CFR60.11(b). All
visible observations shall be documented and dated in a log. This log
shall include the observation date, equipment identification, whether
any visible emissions were observed and their opacity. This log shall be
kept on-site and all log entries kept for a calendar period of five(5)
years from the date of log entry. If visible emissions exceed the
opacity limits specified in conditions 5.E.1(a) through 5.E.1(f) then
the owner/operator shall locate and correct the problem(s) causing the
exceedance immediately. The source of any excess visible emissions and
the actions taken to eliminate them shall also be recorded in the log.

6.B.9(e)	Physical or Operational Change in Quarry Operations

(40CFR60.7(a)(4)) The owner/operator shall submit a notification of any
physical or operational change in quarry operations to the Department
which may increase the emission rate of any air pollutant to which a
standard applies, unless that change is specifically exempted under an
applicable subpart or in 40CFR60.14(e). This notice shall be postmarked
within 60 calendar days or as soon as practicable before the change is
commenced and include information describing the precise nature of the
change, present and proposed emission control systems, productive
capacity of the facility before and after the change, and the expected
completion date of the change. The Department may request additional
relevant information subsequent to this notice.

MONITORING AND REPORTING (UNIT ID 02 KILN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT) (ROTARY
KILN)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.10(a)	Continuous Monitoring of Rotary Kiln Dioxin/Furan Emissions

(40CFR63.1350(f)) The owner/operator shall calibrate, maintain and
operate a temperature monitoring system to continuously monitor
Dioxin/Furan emissions by continuously recording the temperature of the
Rotary Kiln exhaust gases. The recorder response range shall include
zero(0) and 1.5 times either of the average temperatures established
according to the requirements of condition 6.B.6(w). The reference
method shall be a National Institute of Standards and Technology
calibrated reference thermocouple-potentiometer system or alternate
reference, subject to approval by the Department. The three(3)-hour
rolling average temperature shall be calculated as the average of 180
successive one(1)-minute average temperatures. Periods of time when
one(1)-minute averages are not available shall be ignored when
calculating three(3)-hour rolling averages. When one(1)-minute averages
become available, the first one(1)-minute average shall be added to the
previous 179 values to calculate the three(3)-hour rolling average. When
the operating status of the raw mill of the in-line kiln/ raw mill is
changed from off to on, or from on to off the calculation of the
three-hour rolling average temperature shall begin anew, without
considering previous recordings. The calibration of all thermocouples
and other temperature sensors shall be verified at least once every
three(3) months.

MONITORING AND REPORTING (UNIT ID 02 KILN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT) (ROTARY
KILN)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.10(b)	Continuous Monitoring of Rotary Kiln Visible Emissions

(40CFR63.8(c)(4)(i) and 40CFR63.1350(c)) The owner/operator shall
calibrate, maintain and operate in accordance with 40CFR63 Subpart A and
40CFR60 Appendix B Performance Specification 1 a COMS to measure the
opacity of the visible emissions discharged into the atmosphere from the
Rotary Kiln. This COMS shall complete a minimum of one cycle of sampling
and analyzing for each successive 10-second period and one cycle of data
recording for each successive 6-minute period. For this COMS, the
owner/operator shall also maintain a log of the span and zero from each
calibration of the monitor. This log shall be kept on-site and each log
entry kept for a calendar period of five(5) years from the date of entry
and made available to Department personnel upon request.

6.B.10(c)	Continuous Monitoring of Rotary Kiln Particulate Matter
Emissions

(40CFR63.1350(k)) The owner/operator shall install, calibrate, maintain
and operate a CPMS to measure the particulate matter discharged to the
atmosphere from the Rotary Kiln. However, compliance with the
requirements to install, calibrate, maintain and operate the monitor is
not required until such time that the EPA promulgates all applicable
performance specifications and operational requirements.

6.B.10(d)	Records of Rotary Kiln Clinker Production and Feed Rates

(SC Regulation 61-62.5 Standard 7 and SC Regulation 61-62.99 Subpart B
Section 99.44(c)(4)) The owner/operator shall keep records of the
clinker production and kiln feed rates. The clinker production and kiln
feed rates shall be recorded daily. For the purpose of remaining a
synthetic minor plant under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) program specified by SC Regulation 61-62.5 Standard 7, the
owner/operator is limited to a maximum clinker production rate for the
Rotary Kiln of 1,095,000 tons/year (12 month rolling sum).  The
owner/operator shall not exceed 20% of this production limit with the
vertical spindle mill in the off mode and shall accomplish at least 80%
of this production limit with the vertical spindle mill in the on mode.
The owner/operator shall record the monthly Rotary Kiln clinker
production for both the vertical spindle mill on and off modes. These
records shall be maintained on-site and on-file for a calendar period of
five(5) years from the initial recording date and made available to
Department personnel upon request.

6.B.10(e)	Hot Gas Generator and Rotary Kiln Permitted Fuels

(SC Regulation 61-62.5 Standard 2 and SC Regulation 62.5 Standard 8) The
owner/operator is permitted to burn diesel fuel, coal, synthetic coal,
shredded used tires, whole used tires, natural gas, on-site generated
specification used oil, on-site generated materials (i.e. absorbent pads
and wipes) and No.6 Virgin Fuel Oil or any fuel approved by the
Department. Non-regulated wastes (Non-Hazardous Waste as specified by
40CFR 262.11)  are also permitted for use as Rotary Kiln and Hot Gas
Generator fuels if no additional equipment is required for their
handling and the Sulfur and Nitrogen content of the waste is not higher
than that of the coal used by the facility. If a non-regulated waste
requires additional handling equipment, then the owner/operator shall
obtain Department approval prior to using that waste as a fuel. The use
of any other substances as fuel is prohibited without prior written
approval from the Department. The on-site generated used oil shall be
analyzed for the constituents and parameters as specified by
40CFR279.11. If the on-site generated used oil does not meet the
allowable levels for the constituents and parameters in 40CFR279.11,
then the owner/operator shall gain approval from the Department before
it can be used as a fuel. Records shall be kept on-site and on-file that
show each non-regulated waste or waste stream used as a fuel is not a
hazardous waste as defined by SC Regulation 61.79-262.

MONITORING AND REPORTING (UNIT ID 02 KILN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT) (ROTARY
KILN)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.10(f)	Sulfur Content of Rotary Kiln Fuels

(SC Regulation 61-62.5 Standard 7 Avoidance) The maximum percent sulfur
content of the fuel(s) burned in the Rotary Kiln shall be established by
utilizing the weighted percent sulfur contained in the fuel(s) during
the most recent Pollutant Performance Test for compliance with the SO2
limits contained in this permit. Once the weighted percent is
established, the owner/operator shall record daily the fuels burned in
the Rotary Kiln and maintain records that indicate the weighted percent
sulfur in these fuels do not exceed the maximum percent established
during the Pollutant Performance Test. The weighted percent sulfur
content of the fuel shall be based on the actual sulfur content of the
individual fuels and the amount of the individual fuels burned in the
kiln system. Compliance with the weighted sulfur content shall be
determined on a 12-month rolling sum basis. These records shall be
maintained on-site and on-file for a calendar period of five(5) calendar
years and made available to Department personnel upon request.

6.B.10(g)	Maximum Percent Kiln Gas Volume for Vertical Spindle Mill
Modes

(SC Regulation 61-62.5 Standard 7 Avoidance) The volume of the flue gas
exiting the PCM at standard conditions shall not exceed 5.0% of the flue
gas volume exiting the kiln system. with the vertical spindle mill in
the on or off mode.  The owner/operator shall record the percentage of
kiln gas volume exiting this stack for each change in the vertical
spindle mill mode. These records shall be maintained on-site and on-file
for a calendar period of five(5) calendar  years and made available to
Department personnel upon request.

6.B.10(h)	Rotary Kiln Combustion System Inspections

(40CFR63.1350(i)) Unless this requirement has been removed by the EPA,
then the owner/operator shall conduct an inspection of the components of
the Rotary Kiln combustion system at least once per year. The initial
combustion system inspection shall take place within one(1) calendar
year of June 14, 2002. After the date of inspection, subsequent
inspections shall be conducted within one(1) calendar year of the
previous inspection date. All inspections shall be documented and
include the date and time of inspection, clearly identify any problems
and list the corrective action(s) taken. Each documented inspection
shall be maintained on-site and on-file for a calendar period of five(5)
years from the date of inspection and made available to Department
personnel upon request. If this requirement has been removed by the EPA,
Rotary Kiln combustion system inspections are no longer required but
records of any previous inspections shall be kept on-site and on-file as
required by this condition.

6.B.10(i)	Visible Emission Monitoring of Uncontrolled Coal Processing
Equipment

(SC Regulation 61-62.70.6(a)(3)(i)(B)) The owner/operator shall monitor
for visible emissions from the Coal Crusher Tower, Coal Grizzley, Radial
Stacker Belt, Coal Reclaim Hoppers, Reclaim Belt to Coal Day Tank, South
Coal Day Tank, Pre-Cal Coal Day Tank, Coal Cyclone Dust Collector, Coal
Day Tank Screw Conveyor, Pre-Cal Coal Day Tank Belt Conveyor, 672 Kiln
Coal Mill Feed Conveyor, 672 Kiln Coal Mill, Rail Road Coal Unloading
Hopper, 925’ Coal Inclined Belt Conveyor and Coal Transfer from C32
Belt by conducting while the affected source(s) are in operation a
weekly visible emissions test in accordance with 40CFR60 Appendix A
Method 9. All visible observations shall be documented and dated in a
log. This log shall include the observation date, equipment
identification, whether any visible emissions were observed and their
opacity. This log shall be kept on-site and all log entries kept for a
calendar period of five(5) years from the date of log entry. If visible
emissions exceed the applicable opacity limits for this equipment then
the owner/operator shall locate and correct the problem(s) causing the
exceedance immediately. The source of any excess visible emissions and
the actions taken to eliminate them shall also be recorded in the log.

MONITORING AND REPORTING (UNIT ID 02 KILN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT) (ROTARY
KILN)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.10(j)	Maximum Rotary Kiln PMCD Inlet Gas Temperature Limit

(40CFR63.1344(a) and 40CFR63.1344(b)) Since the Rotary Kiln is subject
to a Dioxin/Furan emission limitation as specified in condition
5.E.2(o), the owner/operator shall operate the Rotary Kiln such that the
temperature of the gas at the inlet to the Rotary Kiln PMCD does not
exceed the applicable temperature limit  when the raw mill of the
in-line kiln/raw mill is operating and not operating. The temperature
limit shall be determined during the Pollutant Performance Test required
by condition 6.B.6(w). Monitoring of the temperature shall be as
required by condition 6.B.10(a).

6.B.10(k)	Total NOx Emissions Recordkeeping and Reporting

(SC Regulation 61-62.99 Subpart B Section 99.44(a)(2) and SC Regulation
61-62.99 Subpart B Section 99.44(c)(1)) The owner/operator shall
maintain daily records of NOx emissions in lb NOx/ton of clinker for the
control periods as defined in this condition. It shall also submit a
report to the Department by October 31 of each year documenting the
total NOx emissions.  For the control period that starts on May 31,
2004, the report shall document the total emissions from May 31 through
September 30. For all subsequent control periods, the report shall
document the total NOX emissions from May 1 through September 30. These
records shall be maintained on-site and on-file for a calendar period of
five(5) calendar years and made available to Department personnel upon
request.

MONITORING AND REPORTING (UNIT ID 03 CLINKER HANDLING EQUIPMENT)
(CLINKER COOLER)

Condition Number	Condition

6.B.11(a)	Continuous Monitoring of Clinker Cooler Visible Emissions

(40CFR63.8(c)(4)(i), 40CFR63.1350(d)(1) and 40CFR63.1350(d)(3)) The
owner/operator shall monitor opacity at each point where emissions are
vented from the clinker cooler. It shall install, calibrate, maintain,
and continuously operate a continuous opacity monitor located at the
outlet of the clinker cooler PMCD to continuously monitor the opacity.
The COMS shall be installed, maintained, calibrated, and operated as
required by 40CFR63 Subpart A and 40CFR60 Appendix B Performance
Specification 1. To remain in compliance, the opacity shall be
maintained such that the six(6)-minute average opacity for any
six(6)-minute block period does not exceed 10%. If the average opacity
for any six(6)-minute block period exceeds 10% it constitutes a
violation of the standard. This COMS shall complete a minimum of one
cycle of sampling and analyzing for each successive 10-second period and
one cycle of data recording for each successive 6-minute period.

PART 7.0	ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS

	A.	SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

Condition Number	Condition

7.A.1	Applicability of Regulations

The owner/operator is subject to all applicable provisions of 40CFR60
Subpart A, 40CFR60 Subpart Y, 40CFR60 Subpart OOO, 40CFR63 Subpart A and
40CFR63 Subpart LLL. It is also subject to all applicable provisions of
the SC State Air Pollution Control Standards.

7.A.2	Conduct of Non-Enclosed Operations

(SC Standard 4 Section X) All non-enclosed operations shall be conducted
in such a manner that a minimum of particulate matter becomes airborne.
In no case shall established ambient air quality standards be exceeded
at or beyond the property line. The owner/operator shall maintain dust
control of the premises and any roadway it owns or controls by paving,
or other suitable measures. Oil treatment is prohibited. All crushing,
drying, classification and like operations shall employ a suitable
control device acceptable to the Department, and shall discharge no more
particulate matter than that specified in this permit.

7.A.3	Prohibited Activities

(40CFR63.4(a)(1)) The owner/operator shall not operate any affected
source subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL in violation of the applicable
requirements of  that subpart. Affected sources subject to and in
compliance with either an Extension of Compliance or an exemption from
compliance are not in violation of the applicable requirements. An
Extension of Compliance can be granted by the EPA, Department or by the
President of the United States under Clean Air Act Section 112(i)(4).

7.A.4	Circumvention

(40CFR60.12 and 40CFR63.4(b)) The owner/operator shall not build, erect,
install, or use any article, machine, equipment, or process to conceal
an emission that would otherwise constitute noncompliance with a
relevant standard. Such concealment includes, but is not limited to the
use of diluents to achieve compliance with a relevant standard based on
the concentration of a pollutant in the effluent discharged to the
atmosphere and the use of gaseous diluents to achieve compliance with a
relevant standard for visible emissions.

B.	OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY [SC Regulation 61-62.70.7(e)(5)]

No proposed reasonably anticipated operating scenarios identified in the
permittee’s Part 70 Application.

C.	COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE [SC Regulation 61-62.70.5(c)(8)]

Not applicable at this time.

D.	PERMIT SHIELD [SC Regulation 61-62.70.6(f)]

A copy of the “applicability determination” Lafarge Building
Materials (Harleyville Plant) submitted with it’s Part 70 permit
application is included as Attachment C.  Compliance with the terms and
conditions of this permit shall be deemed compliance with any applicable
requirements as of the date of permit issuance.  The permittee shall
also be shielded from any non-applicable requirements as agreed upon by
the Department as specified in Attachment C.

SC Regulation 61-62.5, Standard No. 7

Nothing in the permit shield or in any Part 70 permit shall alter or
affect the provisions of Section 303 of the Act, Emergency Orders, of
the Clean Air Act; the liability of the permittee for any violation of
applicable requirements prior to or at the time of permit issuance; the
applicable requirements of  the Acid Rain Program, consistent with
Section 408(a) of the Clean Air Act; or the ability of EPA to obtain
information from a source pursuant to Section 114 of the Clean Air Act.
In addition, the permit shield shall not apply to emission units in
noncompliance at the time of permit issuance, minor permit modifications
(SC Regulation 61- 62.70.7(e)(2)), group processing of minor permit
modifications (SC Regulation 61- 62.70.7(e)(3)), or operational
flexibility (SC Regulation 61-62.70.7(e)(5)), except as specified in SC
Regulation 61-62.70.7(e)(5)(iii).

MODELING DESCRIPTION: As built modeling.  Inorganic toxics modeled by
doubling the PM10 emission rate to get a TSP rate and then using an
analysis of the components to calculate a maximum emission rate for that
toxic (based on it’s percentage content in TSP).  Tables 1 through 3
list the results. No emission rates were listed in the modeling summary.

TABLE 1. AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS (STANDARD NO. 2)

Pollutant	Averaging Time	Model Used	Maximum Modeled Concentration
(g/m3)	Background

Concentration (µg/m3)	Total

(µg/m3)	Standard

(µg/m3)

SO2	3 HOUR	ISCST3	224	34	258	1300

	24 HOUR	ISCST3	77	17	94	365

	ANNUAL	ISCST3	8	3	11	80

TSP	ANNUAL	ISCST3	27	27	54	75

PM10	24 HOUR	ISCST3	78	29	107	150

	ANNUAL	ISCST3	13	21	34	50

CO	1 HOUR	ISCST3	1497	14882	16379	40000

	8 HOUR	ISCST3	435	6067	6502	10000

GASEOUS FLUORIDES	12 HOUR	ISCST3	0.069	N/A	0.07	3.7

	24 HOUR	ISCST3	0.060	N/A	0.06	2.9

	1 WEEK	ISCST3	N/A	N/A	0	1.6

	1 MONTH	ISCST3	0.013	N/A	0.01	0.8

NO2	ANNUAL	ISCST3	14	8	22	100

LEAD	QUARTERLY	ISCST3	0.012	0.03	0.04	1.5

TABLE 2. CLASS II PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION  (STANDARD NO.
7)

Pollutant	Averaging Time	Model Used	Maximum Modeled Concentration
(µg/m3)	Standard

(µg/m3)

PM10	24 HOUR	ISCST3	19	30

	ANNUAL	ISCST3	3	17

SO2	3 HOUR	ISCST3	224	512

	24 HOUR	ISCST3	56	91

	ANNUAL	ISCST3	8	20

TABLE 3. TOXIC AIR POLLUTANTS MODELED (STANDARD NO. 8)

Pollutant	CAS Number	Averaging Time	Model Used	Maximum Modeled
Concentration (µg/m3)	Standard

(µg/m3)

Antimony

Compounds	N/A	24 HOURS	ISCST3	0.00520	2.50

Arsenic	7440382	24 HOURS	ISCST3	0.0906	1.00

Benzene	71432	24 HOURS	ISCST3	0.0596	150.00

Beryllium	7440417	24 HOURS	ISCST3	0.00690	0.01

Cadmium	7440439	24 HOURS	ISCST3	0.0206	0.25

Chromium (+6) Compounds	N/A	24 HOURS	ISCST3	0.183	2.50

Cobalt Compounds	N/A	24 HOURS	ISCST3	0.0185	0.25

Ethyl Benzene	100414	24 HOURS	ISCST3	0.0994	4350.00

Manganese Compounds	N/A	24 HOURS	ISCST3	0.827	25.00

Mercury	7439976	24 HOURS	ISCST3	0.0231	0.25

Nickel	7440020	24 HOURS	ISCST3	0.0305	0.50

Phosphorous	7723140	24 HOURS	ISCST3	0.368	0.50

Selenium Compounds	N/A	24 HOURS	ISCST3	0.193	1.00

Xylene	1330207	24 HOURS	ISCST3	0.398	4350.00

Tables 1 and 2 contain a list of equipment and activities which are
considered insignificant pursuant to South Carolina Regulation
61-62.70.5(c). Sources listed below are not exempt from any otherwise
applicable state or federal requirements including, but not limited to,
opacity standards, ambient air quality standards, and air toxic
standards.

TABLE 1. INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES

Equip

ID	Source Description	Design Capacity	Date

Listed	Install

Date	Basis

N/A	No.6 Fuel Oil Storage Tank	1,125,000 gal	1999	2/15/73	Tank not
subject to NSPS due to install date and insignificant emissions

N/A	Large Grinding Aid Tank	10,000 gal	1999	2/15/73	Tank not subject to
NSPS due to install date and insignificant emissions

N/A	Air Entrainment Tank	5,876 gal	1999	2/15/73	Tank not subject to NSPS
due to install date and insignificant emissions

N/A	2 Diesel Fuel Storage Tanks	6,000 gal Each	1999	2/15/73	Tank Size

N/A	Used Oil Tank	300 gal	1999	N/A	Tank Size

N/A	4 Bulk Lubricating Oil

Auxiliary Storage Tanks	1,000 gal Each	1999	2/15/73	Tank Sizes

N/A	10 Truck Shop Used Oil Wagon Auxiliary Storage Tanks	55 gal Each
1999	N/A	Tank Sizes

N/A	Fueling Truck	1,000 gal	1999	N/A	Truck Tank Size

and

Insignificant Emissions

N/A	Lubricant and Solvent Drums	35 to 300 gal Each	1999	N/A	Drum Size

and

Insignificant Emissions

N/A	Portable Air Compressor	250 Hp	1999	N/A	Insignificant Emissions

N/A	Alternative Fuels

Unloading Dump Hopper

 With Screw Conveyor	40 tons	1999	1999	Insignificant Emissions

N/A	Air Entrainment Tank	5,876 gal	1999	2/15/73	Tank Size

and

Insignificant Emissions

N/A	Alternative Fuels

Covered Conveyor Belt

(Unloads dump hopper into bucket elevator)	15 tph	1999	1999
Insignificant Emissions

N/A	Alternative Fuels

Bucket Elevator

(Elevator from grade level to approximately 100 ft above grade level)	15
tph	1999	1999	Insignificant Emissions

TABLE 2. INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES

Equip

ID	Source Description	Design Capacity	Date

Listed	Install

(Modify)

Date	Exemption Basis

N/A	Alternative Fuels

Covered Conveyor Belt

(Conveyor belt to preheater tower)	N/A	1999	1999	Insignificant Emissions

N/A	Alternative Fuels

Intermediate bin with screw conveyor    (Discharge to the precalciner
chute)	7 tph

(600 ft3)	1999	1999

(2005)	Insignificant Emissions

N/A	AF Covered Screw Conveyor for the Discharge to the Precalciner Shoot
and/or AF Air Driven Eductor for the Discharge to the Precalciner Shoot
7 tph	2005	2005	Insignificant Emissions

N/A	Portable Vacuum System	N/A	1999	2001	Insignificant Emissions

N/A	Diesel Fuel Auxiliary Storage Tank	20,000 gal	2004	1998	Tank not
subject to NSPS due to tank size

N/A	Cummins Model DGFA

Diesel Generator	150 kW	2005	2005	Generator Size

Tables 1 through 6 contain the Federal and South Carolina air pollution
regulations, which were specified in the Part 70, permit application and