[Federal Register: December 21, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 245)]
[Notices]
[Page 72808-72809]
[DOCID:fr21de07-136]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-56973; File No. SR-ISE-2007-109]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment
No. 1 Thereto, Relating to Rule 2213, Market Maker Trading Licenses

 December 17, 2007.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on November 14, 2007, the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been substantially
prepared by the ISE. On December 13, 2007, the Exchange filed Amendment
No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The ISE is proposing to amend its Rule 2213, ``Market Maker Trading
Licenses,'' to eliminate the limitation that a foreign exchange options
primary market maker (``FXPMM'') in the Exchange's foreign currency
options (``FX options'') cannot make a market in more than four (4)
currency pairs. The text of the proposed rule change is available on
the Exchange's Web site (http://www.iseoptions.com), at the Exchange,

and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the ISE included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The ISE has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    ISE proposes to amend its Rule 2213, ``Market Maker Trading
Licenses,'' to eliminate the limitation that an FXPMM in the Exchange's
FX options cannot make a market in more than four currency pairs.\3\
Under the Exchange's current rules, FXPMMs are limited to making a
market in no more than four currency pairs.\4\ All four of the FX
options currently listed by the Exchange are served by the same FXPMM.
As a result of the limitation in ISE Rule 2213, that FXPMM is prevented
from serving as a primary market maker in additional currency pairs.
The Exchange intends to launch additional currency pairs in the near
future. In order for the Exchange to allow the current FXPMM to
participate in the auction for those additional currency pairs, ISE
proposes to eliminate the limitation in Rule 2213 that a FXPMM cannot
act as a primary market maker in more than four currency pairs. The
Exchange believes that removing this limitation from its rules will (1)
allow the Exchange to launch additional currency pairs, (2) permit the
current FXPMM to participate in the auction for the additional currency
pairs the Exchange intends to launch, and (3) provide market
participants with an opportunity to trade those additional currency
pairs as a means to diversify their portfolio.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Exchange began trading FX options on the euro, the
British pound, the Japanese yen and the Canadian dollar on April 17,
2007. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55575 (April 3, 2007),
72 FR 17963 (April 10, 2007) (SR-ISE-2006-59).
    \4\ FXPMMs are permitted to quote and trade in FX options only.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The basis under the Act for this proposed rule change is found in
Section 6(b)(5),\5\ in that the proposed change is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, will serve to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and
a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest, by permitting members to become market makers in a
greater number of the Exchange's FX options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-ISE-2007-109 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2007-109. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2007-109 and should be
submitted on or before January 11, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-24800 Filed 12-20-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7059-7062]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02547]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2020-1076; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01201-A]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Bombardier Inc. and de Havilland, Inc.) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for Viking Air Limited (Viking) (type certificate previously held by
Bombardier Inc. and de Havilland, Inc.) Model DHC-3 airplanes. This
proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The
MCAI describes the unsafe condition as corrosion, wear, and fatigue-
related degradation in aging aircraft. This proposed AD would require
establishing a corrosion prevention and control program to identify and
correct corrosion and cracking. This proposed AD would also require
completing all of the initial tasks identified in the program and
reporting corrosion findings to Viking. The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 25,
2022.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Viking Air Limited Technical Support, 1959 De Havilland Way, Sidney,
British Columbia, Canada, V8L 5V5; phone: (North America) (800) 663-
8444; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected];
website: https://www.vikingair.com/support/service-bulletins. You may
view this service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products
Section, Operational Safety Branch, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(817) 222-5110.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-1076; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, the MCAI,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deep Gaurav, Aviation Safety Engineer,
New York ACO Branch, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2020-1076; Project Identifier
MCAI-2020-01201-A'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Deep
Gaurav, Aviation Safety Engineer, New York ACO Branch, FAA, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590. Any commentary that the
FAA receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed
in the public docket for this rulemaking.

Background

    Transport Canada, which is the aviation authority for Canada, has
issued AD CF-2018-04, dated January 19, 2018 (referred to after this as
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition on all serial-numbered
Viking (formerly Bombardier Inc. and de Havilland Inc.) Model DHC-3
airplanes. The MCAI states:

    Service experience indicates that aging aircraft are more likely
to be adversely affected by corrosion, wear and fatigue cracking.
Viking Air Limited (Viking), as Type Certificate holder for the DHC-
3, has developed a supplementary inspection and corrosion control
program which identifies specific areas that must be inspected to
ensure that corrosion, wear and fatigue-related degradation do not
result in an unsafe condition. The program is documented in Viking
Product Support Manual (PSM) 1-3-5 DHC-3 Otter Supplementary
Inspection and Corrosion Control Manual (SICCM).
    Corrosion levels are defined in PSM 1-3-5 as a means for
assessing the effectiveness of the corrosion control program and
recording the results of the inspections mandated by this [Transport
Canada] AD.
    Each item specified for inspection in PSM 1-3-5 has been
substantiated to Transport Canada as having experienced significant
degradation in service and, as having the potential to develop into
an unsafe condition if the inspections defined in the PSM are not
implemented.

    Corrosion and cracking, if not addressed, could lead to structural
failure with consequent loss of control of the airplane. You may
examine the MCAI at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2020-1076.

Related Service Information

    The FAA reviewed Viking DHC-3 Otter Service Bulletin V3/0010,
Revision NC, dated March 19, 2020. The service bulletin provides a list
of new inspection tasks that have been added to the DHC-3 maintenance
program as a supplemental corrosion prevention manual, Viking Product
Support Manual (PSM) 1-3-5 DHC-3 Otter Supplemental Inspection and
Corrosion Control Manual, Revision IR, dated December 21, 2017 (Viking
PSM 1-3-5, Revision IR).
    The FAA also reviewed Viking PSM 1-3-5, Revision IR, which
specifies procedures for inspecting areas of the airplane that are
particularly susceptible to corrosion, wear, and fatigue-related
degradation. Viking PSM 1-3-5, Revision IR, also specifies repetitive
inspection intervals, defines the different levels of corrosion, and
provides corrective action if corrosion is found.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority,
it has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
and service information referenced above. The FAA is issuing this NPRM
after determining that the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

Requirements of the Proposed AD

    This proposed AD would require establishing a corrosion prevention
and control program approved by the FAA, including initial inspection
tasks to identify corrosion and cracking, repetitive inspection
intervals, and corrective actions (such as repairs and application of
corrosion inhibitors) if corrosion or cracking is found. The proposed
AD would also require, before further flight after establishing the
program, completing all of the initial tasks identified in the program.
Lastly, this proposed AD would require reporting corrosion findings to
Viking.

ADs Mandating Airworthiness Limitations

    The FAA has previously mandated airworthiness limitations by
issuing ADs that require revising the airworthiness limitation section
(ALS) of the existing maintenance manual or instructions for continued
airworthiness to incorporate new or revised inspections. This proposed
AD, however, would require establishing and incorporating new
inspections into the maintenance records required by 14 CFR
91.417(a)(2) or 135.439(a)(2) for your airplane. The FAA does not
intend this as a substantive change. Requiring incorporation of the new
ALS requirements into the maintenance records, rather than requiring
individual repetitive inspections and replacements, allows operators to
record AD compliance once after updating the maintenance records,
rather than recording compliance after every inspection and part
replacement.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI

    Transport Canada AD CF-2018-04 requires completing the actions as
specified in Viking PSM 1-3-5, Revision IR. This proposed AD would not
require Viking PSM 1-3-5, Revision IR, but would require establishing a
corrosion prevention and control program using an FAA-approved method.
However, the FAA considers Viking PSM 1-3-5, Revision IR, an approved
method.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 38 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA also estimates that it
would take about 145 work-hours per airplane to establish a corrosion
prevention and control program and comply with the initial tasks of the
program.
    Based on these figures, the FAA estimates the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $468,350 or $12,325 per airplane.
    The FAA estimates it would take about 1work-hour to report any
corrosion found during the proposed initial inspections, for an
estimated cost of $85 per airplane.
    The extent of damage found during the proposed initial inspections
may vary significantly from airplane to airplane. The FAA has no way to
determine the estimated cost of repair or replacement of damaged parts
for each airplane or how many airplanes may need these repairs.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of

information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public
reporting for this collection of information is estimated to take
approximately 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Send comments regarding this burden estimate
or any other aspect of this collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Information Collection
Clearance Officer, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier
Inc. and de Havilland, Inc.): Docket No. FAA-2020-1076; Project
Identifier MCAI-2020-01201-A.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by March 25, 2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Viking Air Limited (type certificate
previously held by Bombardier Inc. and de Havilland, Inc.) Model
DHC-3 airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 2700, Flight Control
System.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as corrosion, wear,
and fatigue-related degradation in aging aircraft. The FAA is
issuing this AD to detect and address corrosion and cracking. This
condition, if not addressed, could lead to structural failure with
consequent loss of control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Inspection and Corrosion Control Program

    Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD, establish
in the maintenance records required by 14 CFR 91.417(a)(2) or
135.439(a)(2), as applicable for your aircraft, a corrosion
prevention and control program approved by the FAA that includes
initial inspections to identify corrosion and cracking, repetitive
inspection intervals, and corrective actions (repairs and
application of corrosion inhibitors) if corrosion or cracking is
found. Before further flight after establishing the corrosion
prevention and control program, complete all of the initial tasks
identified in the program. To obtain FAA approval, you must contact
the New York ACO Branch using the contact information found in
paragraph (j)(3) of this AD.
     Note 1 to paragraph (g): Viking Product Support Manual (PSM) 1-
3-5 DHC-3 Otter Supplemental Inspection and Corrosion Control
Manual, Revision IR, dated December 21, 2017 (Viking PSM 1-3-5,
Revision IR), contains additional information related to this AD and
is an FAA-approved method for establishing a corrosion prevention
and control program.
    Note 2 to paragraph (g): Viking DHC-3 Otter Service Bulletin V3/
0010, Revision NC, dated March 19, 2020 (Viking SB V3/0010, Revision
NC), also contains additional information related to this AD.

(h) Reporting

    If, during any task required by paragraph (g) of this AD, any
corrosion is found: Within 30 days after completing the task or
within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, report the corrosion to Viking at
[email protected] or at the address listed in
paragraph (j)(4) of this AD. The report must include the following:
    (1) Operator;
    (2) Airplane serial number;
    (3) Airplane hours time-in-service at time of inspection;
    (4) Inspection task number and date of inspection;
    (5) Airplane operating environment; and
    (6) Type, level or extent, location, and cause (if known) of
damage.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, New York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (j)(3) of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspection, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved specifically for this AD by the Manager, New York
ACO Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada.

(j) Related Information

    (1) Refer to the MCAI from Transport Canada, AD CF-2018-04,
dated January 19,

2018, for related information. You may examine the MCAI at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2020-1076.
    (2) Viking SB V3/0010, Revision NC and Viking PSM 1-3-5,
Revision IR, contain additional information related to this AD.
    (3) For more information about this AD, contact Deep Gaurav,
Aviation Safety Engineer, New York ACO Branch, FAA, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected].
    (4) For service information related to this AD, contact Viking
Air Limited Technical Support, 1959 De Havilland Way, Sidney,
British Columbia, Canada, V8L 5V5; telephone: (North America) (800)
663-8444; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected]; website: https://www.vikingair.com/support/service-bulletins. You may review this referenced service
information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued on February 1, 2022.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-02547 Filed 2-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 121 (Monday, June 28, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33887]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13722]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2021-0453]

Safety Zones; Annual Fireworks Displays Within the Captain of the
Port Sector Puget Sound Area of Responsibility

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notification of non-enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will not enforce the Safety Zone for the
Seattle Seafair Firework Display in Lake Washington, Seattle, WA in
July 2021. The Captain of the Port Sector Puget Sound has determined
that enforcement of this regulation is not necessary because Seafair
the event was cancelled.

DATES: The Coast Guard does not plan to enforce the Safety Zone for the
Seattle Seafair Firework Display in Lake Washington in 33 CFR 165.1332
in July 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notification of non-enforcement, call or email Lieutenant Peter
McAndrew, Sector Puget Sound Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard normally enforces the safety
zone for the Seattle Seafair Firework Display in Lake Washington,
Seattle, WA found in 33 CFR 165.1332 annually during the month of July.
This year, the event organizers cancelled Seafair. Therefore, the Coast
Guard does not plan to enforce the safety zone for the Seattle Seafair
Firework Display in Lake Washington, Seattle, WA found in 33 CFR
165.1332, in July 2021.
    In addition to this notification of non-enforcement in the Federal
Register, if the situation changes and the Captain of the Port Sector
Puget Sound (COTP) determines that the regulated area needs to be
enforced, the COTP will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners and
provide actual notice of enforcement to any persons in the regulated
area.

    Dated: June 21, 2021.
P.M. Hilbert,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2021-13722 Filed 6-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 176 (Monday, September 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 56211]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23194]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3333-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2011-0001]

New Hampshire; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for
State of New Hampshire (FEMA-3333-EM), dated August 27, 2011, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: August 30, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Albert Lewis,
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for
this emergency.
    This action terminates the appointment of Craig A. Gilbert as
Federal Coordinating Officer for this emergency.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011-23194 Filed 9-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 130 (Tuesday, July 7, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40715-40718]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14505]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-89205; File No. SR-NYSE-2020-55]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rules 7.36 and 7.37

June 30, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on June 24, 2020, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I
and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rules 7.36 and 7.37 relating to
Setter Priority. The proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries,

set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts
of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rules 7.36 and 7.37 relating to
Setter Priority.
Background
    Rule 7.36(h) provides that Setter Priority will be assigned to an
order ranked Priority 2--Display Orders \4\ with a display quantity of
at least a round lot if such order (i) establishes a new BBO and (ii)
either establishes a new NBBO or joins an Away Market NBBO provided
that such order will not be eligible for Setter Priority if there is an
odd-lot sized order with Setter Priority at that price.\5\ The Rule
further provides that only one order is eligible for Setter Priority at
each Price. Rules 7.36(h)(1)-(3) describe how an order is evaluated for
Setter Priority, how it retains Setter Priority, and how it loses
Setter Priority. Finally, Setter Priority is not available for any
portion of an order that is ranked Priority 3--Non-Display Orders and
is not available for allocations in an Auction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Rule 7.36(e) defines the priority categories to which orders
are assigned at each price point. Priority 1--Market Orders are
defined as unexecuted Market Orders that have priority over all
other same-side orders with the same working price (Rule
7.36(e)(1)). Priority 2--Display Orders are defined as non-
marketable Limit Orders with a display price and have second
priority (Rule 7.36(e)(2)). Priority 3--Non-Display Orders are
defined as non-marketable Limit Orders for which the working price
is not displayed, including reserve interest of Reserve Orders, and
have third priority (Rule 7.36(e)(3)).
    \5\ The term ``BBO'' means the best bid or offer on the
Exchange. See Rule 1.1(c). The term ``NBBO'' means the national best
bid or offer. See Rule 1.1(q). An ``Away Market'' means any
exchange, alternative trading system, or other broker-dealer (1)
with which the Exchange maintains an electronic linkage and (2) that
provides instantaneous responses to orders routed from the Exchange.
Accordingly, an Away Market NBBO refers to an NBBO that does not
include the Exchange's BBO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 7.37(b)(1) specifies how an Aggressing Order will be allocated
against contra-side orders at each price.\6\ After first trading with
resting orders ranked Priority 1--Market Orders based on time, an
Aggressing Order will next trade with an order with Setter Priority. As
set forth in Rule 7.37(b)(1)(B), an order with Setter Priority that has
a display price and a working price equal to the BBO will receive 15%
of the remaining quantity of the Aggressing Order, rounded up to the
next round lot size or the remaining displayed quantity of the order
with Setter Priority, whichever is lower. That Rule further provides
that an order with Setter Priority is eligible for allocation under
this Rule if the BBO is no longer the same as the NBBO. Next, the
Aggressing Order will be allocated against orders ranked Priority 2--
Displayed Orders on parity by Participant. Any remaining quantity of an
order with Setter Priority is eligible to participate in this parity
allocation, consistent with the allocation wheel position of the
Participant that entered the order with Setter Priority. Rules
7.37(b)(1)(C)-(I) describe how the remaining quantity of an Aggressing
Order would be allocated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ An ``Aggressing Order'' is defined as a buy (sell) order
that is or becomes marketable against sell (buy) interest on the
Exchange Book. See Rule 7.36(a)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed Rule Change
    The Exchange proposes two changes to Setter Priority. First, the
Exchange proposes that only those orders that set the NBBO (which would
also set the BBO) would be eligible for Setter Priority. Orders that
set the BBO and join an existing NBBO would no longer be eligible for
Setter Priority. Second, the Exchange proposes that when an order with
Setter Priority is the Exchange's BBO, it would be eligible to trade in
full with the contra-side Aggressing Order.
    To effect these changes, the Exchange proposes to change the first
sentence of Rule 7.36(h) to provide as follows (deleted text in
brackets):

    Setter Priority will be assigned to an order ranked Priority 2--
Display Orders with a display quantity of at least a round lot if
such order [(i) establishes a new BBO and (ii) either] establishes a
new NBBO [or joins an Away Market NBBO] provided that such order
will not be eligible for Setter Priority if there is an odd-lot
sized order with Setter Priority at that price.

    With this proposed rule change, the only orders that would be
eligible for Setter Priority would be displayed orders that establish a
new NBBO. The Exchange does not believe that it needs to separately
state that such an order also needs to establish a new BBO because if
an order establishes a new NBBO, it also establishes a new BBO.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ For example, if the BBO is $10.00 x $10.05 and the NBBO is
$10.01 x $10.05, to be eligible for Setter Priority, a bid would
need a limit price of $10.02 or higher (an order with a limit price
of $10.05 or higher would either be routed pursuant to Rule
7.37(c)(1), be assigned a display price of $10.04 pursuant to Rule
7.31(e)(1) or (2), or be displayed at its limit price pursuant to
Rule 7.31(e)(3)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange further proposes to change Rule 7.37(b)(1)(B) as
follows (new text italicized, deleted text bracketed):

    Next, an order with Setter Priority that has a display price and
working price equal to the BBO will trade with [receive 15% of] the
remaining quantity of the Aggressing Order[, rounded up to the next
round lot size or the remaining displayed quantity of the order with
Setter Priority, whichever is lower]. If the size of the Aggressing
Order is equal to or larger than the size of the order with Setter
Priority, the order with Setter Priority will trade in full. If the
size of the Aggressing Order is smaller than the size of the order
with Setter Priority, the order with Setter Priority will trade with
the remaining quantity of the Aggressing Order. An order with Setter
Priority is eligible for allocation under this subparagraph if the
BBO is no longer the same as the NBBO.

    With this proposed change, after an Aggressing Order trades first
with Market Orders, as described in Rule 7.37(b)(1)(A), the remaining
quantity of the Aggressing Order would trade with an order with Setter
Priority that has a display price and working price equal to the BBO.
As with the current rule, an order with Setter Priority is eligible for
this priority allocation only if such order is the BBO when it is
trading with the Aggressing Order.
    Under the proposal, instead of a 15% allocation (rounded up to the
next round lot size, or the full quantity of the Aggressing Order), an
order with Setter Priority would be eligible for up to 100% of the size
of the Aggressing Order. Accordingly, with this proposed change, an
order with Setter Priority would execute in the same manner that a top-
of-book, resting, displayed order would trade on an exchange with a
price-time priority model.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ For example, on NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca''), an incoming
marketable order will be matched for execution against contra-side
orders in the NYSE Arca Book according to the price-time priority
ranking of the resting orders. See NYSE Arca Rule 7.37-E(a). Non-
marketable Limit Orders with a displayed working price have second
priority on NYSE Arca. See NYSE Arca Rule 7.37-E(e)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the size of the Aggressing Order is equal to or larger than the
size of the order with Setter Priority, the order with Setter Priority
would trade in full. For example, if the order with Setter Priority is
400 shares and the remaining quantity of the contra-side Aggressing
Order is 400 shares or more, the order with Setter Priority would trade
in full. If the size of the Aggressing Order is over 400 shares, the
remaining quantity of the Aggressing Order would be allocated as
described in Rules 7.37(b)(1)(C)-(I).
    If the size of the Aggressing Order is smaller than the size of the
order with Setter Priority, the order with Setter Priority would trade
with the remaining

quantity of the Aggressing Order. For example, if the order with Setter
Priority is 400 shares and the remaining quantity of the contra-side
Aggressing Order is 300 shares, the order with Setter Priority would
trade with those 300 shares and the Aggressing Order would be fully
executed. The remaining 100 shares of the order with Setter Priority
would retain their Setter Priority and be eligible to interact with the
next contra-side Aggressing Order.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Rule 7.36(h)(2)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With this revised allocation proposal, if there is a remaining
quantity of the Aggressing Order, there would not be any quantity left
of the order with Setter Priority. Because there would not be any
quantity of the order with Setter Priority to trade on parity with
other displayed orders, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule
7.37(b)(1)(C) to delete the second sentence of that Rule in full.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The second sentence of Rule 7.37(b)(1)(C) currently
provides: ``Any remaining quantity of an order with Setter Priority
is eligible to participate in this parity allocation, consistent
with the allocation wheel position of the Participant that entered
the order with Setter Priority.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that these proposed changes would provide an
incentive for member organizations to improve the best bid or offer on
the Exchange. Specifically, the Exchange believes that providing orders
with Setter Priority an execution experience similar to that on price-
time priority models, i.e., that such orders would be eligible to trade
in full with the contra-side Aggressing Order, would provide an
incentive for member organizations to direct their liquidity-providing
order flow to the Exchange.
    This proposed rule change is also designed to operate seamlessly
with the Exchange's parity allocation model. If there is no order with
Setter Priority eligible to trade, an Aggressing Order would be
allocated consistent with the existing allocation model, as described
in Rule 7.37(b)(1)(C)-(I), without any changes. Likewise, after trading
with an order with Setter Priority, any remaining quantity of an
Aggressing Order would be allocated consistent with the existing
allocation model, as described in Rule 7.37(b)(1)(C)-(I), without any
changes.
Implementation
    Subject to approval of this proposed rule change, the Exchange
anticipates that it could implement the proposed changes to Setter
Priority in August 2020. The Exchange would announce the implementation
date of this proposed rule change by Trader Update.
2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act,\11\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of
the Act,\12\ in particular, in that it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system because it is designed to create an incentive
to improve the best displayed bid or offer on the Exchange. The
Exchange already provides an increased allocation opportunity for
orders with Setter Priority. The Exchange believes that both narrowing
which orders are eligible for Setter Priority and increasing the
execution opportunity for an order with Setter Priority would provide
an incentive for member organizations to route orders to the Exchange
that would set a new NBBO, which would benefit all market participants.
    The Exchange further believes that the proposed rule change would
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system because it is designed to provide
an incentive for member organizations to route their price-forming
liquidity-providing orders to the Exchange by providing such orders
with an execution opportunity that is similar to how such orders would
trade if they were the top-of-book, resting, displayed order on an
exchange with a price-time priority model. Accordingly, the proposed
allocation of an order with Setter Priority is not novel, as it is how
such a resting, displayed order would trade if it were top of book on
an exchange with a price-time priority model.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange operates in a
highly competitive market. Equity trading is currently dispersed across
13 exchanges,\13\ 31 alternative trading systems,\14\ and numerous
broker-dealer internalizers and wholesalers, all competing for order
flow. Based on publicly-available information, no single exchange has
more than 20% market share (whether including or excluding auction
volume).\15\ More specifically, the Exchange's market share of trading
in Tapes A, B and C securities combined is less than 13%. In this
competitive market, Exchange member organizations are often members of
multiple exchanges, and can direct liquidity-providing order flow to
more than one exchange. The proposed rule change would promote inter-
market competition because it would provide an additional incentive for
member organizations to improve the best displayed bid or offer on the
Exchange, which would benefit all market participants. The Exchange
further believes that the proposed rule change would promote intra-
market competition because Setter Priority would be available on equal
terms to any member organization that sets a new NBBO on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume
Summary, available at http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/. See generally https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/divisionsmarketregmrexchangesshtml.html.
    \14\ See FINRA ATS Transparency Data, available at https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/AtsIssueData. A list of
alternative trading systems registered with the Commission is
available at https://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/atslist.htm.
    \15\ See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Equities Market Volume
Summary, available at http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register, or such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2020-55 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2020-55. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2020-55 and should be submitted on
or before July 28, 2020.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-14505 Filed 7-6-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 154 (Thursday, August 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 47627]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19519]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER12-2310-000]

Zephyr Wind, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding,
of Zephyr Wind, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with
an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability is August 24, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 3, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-19519 Filed 8-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68430]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27092]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC15-25-000.
    Applicants: Constellation Power Source Generation, LLC, Exelon
Generation Company, LLC, Chief Keystone Power, LLC, Chief Conemaugh
Power, LLC.
    Description: Joint Application for Authorization for Disposition
and Consolidation of Jurisdictional Facilities and Acquisition of
Existing Generation Facilities and Request for Expedited Action of
Constellation Power Source Generation, LLC, et. al.
    Filed Date: 11/6/14.
    Accession Number: 20141106-5079.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: EC15-26-000.
    Applicants: Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Energy Services, LLC,
Samchully Power & Utilities 1 LLC.
    Description: Joint Application for Authorization for Disposition of
Jurisdictional Facilities and Request for Expedited Action and
Abbreviated Comment Period of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Energy
Services, LLC, et. al.
    Filed Date: 11/6/14.
    Accession Number: 20141106-5116.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/28/14.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER15-353-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: Notices of Cancellation and Termination for inactive
and or expired service agreements of PacifiCorp under ER15-353.
    Filed Date: 11/6/14.
    Accession Number: 20141106-5067.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-354-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): BPA
General Transfer Agreement (West) Rev 4 to be effective 1/6/2015.
    Filed Date: 11/6/14.
    Accession Number: 20141106-5068.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-355-000.
    Applicants: Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
    Description: Initial rate filing per 35.12 Baseline new to be
effective 11/7/2014.
    Filed Date: 11/6/14.
    Accession Number: 20141106-5072.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-356-000.
    Applicants: Chief Conemaugh Power, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing per 35.1: MBR Application to
be effective 12/22/2014.
    Filed Date: 11/6/14.
    Accession Number: 20141106-5097.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-357-000.
    Applicants: Chief Keystone Power, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing per 35.1: MBR Application to
be effective 12/22/2014.
    Filed Date: 11/6/14.
    Accession Number: 20141106-5098.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-358-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 2014-
11-06_RTO Adder Filing to be effective 11/7/2014.
    Filed Date: 11/6/14.
    Accession Number: 20141106-5108.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/28/14.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 6, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-27092 Filed 11-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 210 (Tuesday, October 30, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54616-54617]
[FR Doc No: 2018-23647]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2016-0005]

Preparations for the 36th Session of the UN Sub-Committee of
Experts on the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and
Labelling of Chemicals (UNSCEGHS)

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),
Department of Labor.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is to advise interested persons that on Tuesday,
November 13, 2018, OSHA will conduct a public meeting to discuss
proposals in preparation for the 36th session of the United Nations
Sub-Committee of Experts on the Globally Harmonized System of
Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (UNSCEGHS) to be held
December 5 through December 7, 2018, in Geneva, Switzerland. OSHA,
along with the U.S. Interagency Globally Harmonized System of
Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) Coordinating Group,
plans to consider the comments and information gathered at this public
meeting when developing the U.S. Government positions for the UNSCEGHS
meeting. OSHA also will give an update on the Regulatory Cooperation
Council (RCC).
    Also on Tuesday, November 13, 2018, the Department of
Transportation (DOT), Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA) will conduct a public meeting (See Docket No.
PHMSA-2018-0024 Notice No. 2018-11) to discuss proposals in preparation
for the 54th session of the United Nations Sub-Committee of Experts on
the Transport of Dangerous Goods (UNSCE TDG) to be held November 26
through December 4, 2018, in Geneva, Switzerland. During this meeting,
PHMSA is also requesting comments relative to potential new work items
that may be considered for inclusion in its international agenda. PHMSA
will also provide an update on recent actions to enhance transparency
and stakeholder interaction through improvements to the international
standards portion of its website.

DATES: Tuesday, November 13, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Both meetings will be held at the DOT Headquarters
Conference Center, West Building, Oklahoma City Conference Room, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
    Times and Locations: PHMSA public meeting: 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. EDT,
Oklahoma City Conference Room, OSHA public meeting: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
EDT, Oklahoma City Conference Room
    Advanced Meeting Registration: DOT requests that attendees pre-
register for these meetings by completing the form at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/XGN8J7X.
    Attendees may use the same form to pre-register for both meetings.
Failure to pre-register may delay your access into the DOT Headquarters
building. Additionally, if you are attending in person, arrive early to
allow time for security checks necessary to access the building.
    Conference call-in and ``Skype meeting'' capability will be
provided for both meetings. Information on how to access the conference
call and ``Skype meeting'' will be posted when available at: https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/international-program/international-program-overview
under Upcoming Events. This information will also be posted on OSHA's
Hazard Communication website on the international tab at: https://

www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/hazcom_international.html#meeting-notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: At the Department of Transportation,
please contact Mr. Steven Webb or Mr. Aaron Wiener, Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC 20590,
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    At the Department of Labor, please contact Ms. Maureen Ruskin, OSHA
Directorate of Standards and Guidance, Department of Labor, Washington
DC 20210, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    The OSHA Meeting: OSHA is hosting an open informal public meeting
of the U.S. Interagency GHS Coordinating Group to provide interested
groups and individuals with an update on GHS-related issues and an
opportunity to express their views orally and in writing for
consideration in developing U.S. Government positions for the upcoming
UNSCEGHS meeting.
    General topics on the agenda include:
     Review of Working Papers.
     Correspondence Group updates.
     Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) update.
    Information on the work of the UNSCEGHS including meeting agendas,
reports, and documents from previous sessions can be found on the
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Transport
Division website located at the following web address: http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_welcome_e.html.
    The UNSCEGHS bases its decisions on Working papers. The Working
Papers for the 36th session of the UNSCEGHS are located at: https://www.unece.org/trans/main/dgdb/dgsubc3/c32018.html.
    Informal Papers submitted to the UNSCEGHS provide information for
the Sub-Committee and are used either as a mechanism to provide
information to the Sub-Committee or as the basis for future Working
Papers. Informal Papers for the 36th session of the UNSCEGHS are
located at: https://www.unece.org/trans/main/dgdb/dgsubc4/c4inf35.html.
    In addition to participating at the public meeting, interested
parties may submit comments on the Working and Informal Papers for the
36th session of the UNSCEGHS to the docket established for
International/Globally Harmonized System (GHS) efforts at http://www.regulations.gov, Docket No. OSHA-2016-0005.
    The PHMSA Meeting: The Federal Register notice and additional
detailed information relating to PHMSA's public meeting will be
available upon publication at: http://www.regulations.gov (Docket No.
PHMSA-2018-0024; Notice No. 2018-11), and on the PHMSA website at:
https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/international-program/international-program-overview.
    The primary purpose of PHMSA's meeting is to prepare for the 54th
session of the UNSCE TDG. This session represents the third meeting
scheduled for the 2017-2018 biennium. UNSCOE will consider proposals
for the 21st Revised Edition of the United Nations Recommendations on
the Transport of Dangerous Goods (Model Regulations), which may be
implemented into relevant domestic, regional, and international
regulations from January 1, 2021. Copies of working documents, informal
documents, and the meeting agenda may be obtained from the United
Nations (UN) Transport Division's website at https://www.unece.org/trans/main/dgdb/dgsubc3/c32018.html.
    During this meeting, PHMSA is also soliciting input relative to
preparing for the 54th session of the UNSCE TDG as well as potential
new work items which may be considered for inclusion in its
international agenda. Following the 54th session of the UNSCE TDG, a
copy of the Sub-Committee's report will be available at the UN
Transport Division's website at http://www.unece.org/trans/main/dgdb/dgsubc3/c3rep.html.
    Additional information regarding the UNSCE TDG and related matters
can be found on PHMSA's website at https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/international-program/international-program-overview.
    Authority and Signature: This document was prepared under the
direction of Loren Sweatt, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Labor, pursuant to
sections 4, 6, and 8 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970
(29 U.S.C. 653, 655, 657), and Secretary's Order 1-2012 (77 FR 3912),
(Jan. 25, 2012).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on October 24, 2018.
Loren Sweatt,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2018-23647 Filed 10-29-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-26-P