[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 24, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 32744]
[FR Doc No: 2016-12204]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER16-1724-000]

Paulding Wind Farm III LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Paulding Wind Farm III LLC`s application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is June 7, 2016.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 18, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-12204 Filed 5-23-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: June 1, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 105)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 31093-31097]
[DOCID:fr01jn06-12]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR PART 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2004-MI-0001; FRL-8167-2]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Michigan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is partially approving and partially disapproving
revisions to the Michigan State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions were submitted to the EPA by the Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality (MDEQ) on April 3, 2003, May 28, 2003, September
17, 2004, October 25, 2004 and June 8, 2005. The following sections of
Michigan's rules are affected: Part 3: Emission Limitations and
Prohibitions--Particulate Matter; Part 4: Emission Limitations and
Prohibitions--Sulfur-bearing Compounds; Part 6: Emission Limitations
and Prohibitions--Existing Sources of Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions; Part 7: Emission Limitations and Prohibitions--New Sources
of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions; Part 9: Emission Limitations
and Prohibitions--Miscellaneous; Part 10: Intermittent Testing and
Sampling; and Part 11: Continuous Emission Monitoring. The revisions
are primarily administrative changes and minor corrections. EPA's
proposed partial approval and partial disapproval was published on
December 29, 2005.

DATES: This final rule is effective on July 3, 2006.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2004-MI-0001. All documents in the docket are listed on
the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index,

some information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at

the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation
Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This
facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays. We recommend that you telephone Kathleen
D'Agostino, Environmental Engineer, at<PHONE_NUMBER> before visiting
the Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen D'Agostino, Environmental
Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. What Is the Background for This Rule?
II. What Comments Did We Receive and What Are Our Responses?
III. What Action Is EPA Taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews.

I. What Is the Background for This Rule?

    On April 3, 2003, May 28, 2003, September 17, 2004, October 25,
2004, and June 8, 2005 the MDEQ submitted revisions to the Michigan
SIP. These submissions revise the following sections of Michigan's Air
Pollution Control Rules: R 336.1301, R 336.1303, R 336.1330, R 336.1331
except item C8 of Table 31, R 336.1358, R 336.1361, R 336.1362, R
336.1363, R 336.1371, R 336.1372, R 336.1374, R 336.1401, R 336.1403, R
336.1601, R 336.1602, R 336.1604 to R 336.1608, R 336.1615 to R
336.1619, R 336.1622, R 336.1623, R 336.1625, R 336.1627 to R 336.1631,
R 336.1702, R 336.1705, R 336.1906, R 336.1911, R 336.1930, R 336.2001
to R 336.2005, R 336.2007, R 336.2011 to R 336.2014, R 336.2021, R
336.2040 except subrules (9) and (10), R 336.2041, R 336.2101, R
336.2150, R 336.2155, R 336.2159, R 336.2170, R 336.2175, R 336.2189,
and R 336.2190. The revisions are primarily administrative changes and
minor corrections.
    On December 29, 2005 (70 FR 77113), we proposed to partially
approve and partially disapprove the State's submittal. We proposed to
disapprove Rules R 336.1602 and R 336.2041 and to approve the remainder
of the rules submitted by the State. The rationale for EPA's proposed
action is explained in the notice of proposed rulemaking and will not
be restated here.

II. What Comments Did We Receive and What Are Our Responses?

    This section summarizes the comments submitted during the public
comment period for the notice of proposed rulemaking and provides EPA's
response to those comments. The comment period closed January 30, 2006.
Adverse comments were received from the MDEQ.
    Comment: The proposed Rule 602 revisions are appropriate and
necessary to conform to the current version of Rule 610. Further, EPA's
concern about eliminating the approved references should not be an
issue because the version of Rules 602 and 610 that are approved in the
SIP contain identical language as the current MDEQ Rules 602 and 610 in
the specific subrules in question. The revisions being made to Rule 602
are simply changing the Rule 610 references to align with numbering
changes to the relevant subrules in Rule 610. The fact that there are
some other portions of MDEQ's current Rule 610 that are not approved by
EPA and in the SIP should not impact the specific revisions that EPA is
proposing to disapprove.
    Response: Rule R 336.1602 (Rule 602) contains general provisions
for sources of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions. Rule R
336.1610 (Rule 610) regulates VOC emissions from coating lines. These
rules were submitted by Michigan and approved by EPA pursuant to the
Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) requirements of sections
182(a)(2)(A) and (b)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). See 59 FR 46182.
Further, MDEQ has made revisions to the state version of R 336.1610
which EPA has not approved into the SIP, and which are not currently
before EPA for review.
    In reviewing the revisions to Rule 602 that MDEQ has submitted for
approval into the SIP, EPA must evaluate their impact on the version of
Rule 610 currently approved into the SIP. With respect to the SIP, the
non-SIP approved, non-federally enforceable state version of Rule 610
is irrelevant. Further, the versions of Rules 602 and 610 currently
approved into the SIP do not contain identical language to the versions
currently effective at the state level.
    The SIP approved version of Rule 602 requires any approval of
equivalent emission rates, alternate emission rates, or compliance
methods that are authorized pursuant to R 336.1610(7)(a) or R
336.1610(14), table 63, to be submitted to EPA as a revision to the
SIP. Correspondingly, R 336.1610(7)(a) allows the state to ``authorize
compliance to be based upon a longer averaging period, which shall not
be more than 1 calendar month.'' R 336.1610(14) table 63 (Column B--
transfer efficiency) allows credit for greater transfer efficiencies,
with state approval of the transfer efficiency test method. It is the
references to Rule 610 in Rule 602 that require these deviations to be
submitted to EPA as a revision to the SIP.
    If the changes to Rule 602 were approved by EPA as a revision to
Michigan's SIP, the state would then be required to submit any approval
of equivalent emission rates, alternate emission rates, or compliance
methods that are authorized pursuant to sections R 336.1610(5)(a) or R
336.1610(11), table 63, to EPA as revisions to the SIP. However, in the
version of Rule 610 contained in the SIP, R 336.1610(5)(a) requires
sources to submit a written program for compliance with Rule 610, and
there is no table 63 in R 336.1610(11). Neither section contains
provisions authorizing approval of equivalent emission rates, alternate
emission rates, or compliance methods. Further, the deviations allowed
under SIP-approved R 336.1610(7)(a) and R 336.1610(14), table 63, would
no longer be required to be submitted to EPA as revisions to the SIP.
    As articulated in EPA's December 29, 2005 proposal, approval of the
revision to R 336.1602 would relax RACT by allowing the State to alter
the SIP without EPA review and approval (director's discretion). This
is inconsistent with the requirements of the CAA and with RACT
requirements as set forth in EPA policy guidance documents, including
``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies and
Deviations, Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 1987 Federal
Register Notice,'' dated May 25, 1988. For this reason, EPA is
disapproving the revisions to R 336.1602.
    Comment: The MDEQ agrees that language was added to subrule (1) of
R 336.2041 (Rule 1041) that could allow recordkeeping requirements to
be accepted by the MDEQ that are not SIP-approved. This was added to
address any existing orders, agreements, contracts or rules that
contain recordkeeping provisions but are not made part of the SIP. The
intent was to prevent the unacceptable burden to these sources of
having to revise previously approved recordkeeping provisions to fit
the new Rule 1041 provisions. All recordkeeping in orders, agreements,
contracts, or rules that are initiated after Rule 1041 became effective
would be expected to follow the requirements in Rule 1041. EPA should
accept the language in subrule (1) and approve it into the SIP.
    Response: It should be noted that Rule 1041 was submitted by
Michigan and approved by EPA pursuant to the RACT requirements of
sections 182(a)(2)(A) and (b)(2) of the CAA. See 59 FR 46182.
    In revising Rule 1041, it may have been the intention of MDEQ to
allow recordkeeping flexibility only for those sources subject to
orders, agreements, contracts or rules containing recordkeeping
provisions which had been approved prior to adoption of Rule 1041 in
1993, but not regulated under the SIP. However, these limitations are
not set forth in the rule. As written, the revised rule would allow the
State to alter recordkeeping requirements for sources subject to the
SIP and therefore alter the SIP without EPA review and approval.
    This is inconsistent with the requirements of the CAA and with RACT
requirements as set forth in EPA policy guidance documents, including
``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies and
Deviations, Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 1987 Federal
Register

Notice'' dated May 25, 1988. For this reason, Rule 1041, as revised, is
not approvable.
    Comment: MDEQ recognizes that there may be provisions in Rule 1041
that impact portions of Rule 610 that are not approved into the SIP,
but requests that EPA specifically identify these provisions. MDEQ also
requests that EPA approve any portions of Rule 1041 that reference
parts of Rule 610 that have basically remained the same in the earlier
SIP-approved version of Rule 610 and the revised version.
    Response: In reviewing the revisions to Rule 1041, EPA must
evaluate their impact on the version of Rule 610 currently approved
into the SIP. With respect to the SIP, the non-SIP approved, non-
federally enforceable state version of Rule 610 is irrelevant. The
problem noted in EPA's December 29, 2005 proposal is that Rule 1041 was
revised to state that sources:

subject to emission limits in R 336.1610(11), table 62 shall keep
records as required in the publication entitled ``Protocol for
Determining the Daily Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate of
Automobile and Light-duty Truck Topcoat Operations,'' EPA-450/3-88-
018, December, 1988, which is referenced in R 336.1610(6)(b).

In the SIP approved version of Rule 610, there is no table 62 in
subpart 11, and the publication noted is not referenced in subsection
(6)(b). The revisions are confusing and inconsistent with the SIP.
    Comment: The MDEQ requested that EPA specifically identify
rewording in Rule 1041 that is confusing.
    Response: The wording of subsections (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7),
(8), (9), (10), (11), and (12) is confusing. Each subsection begins
with similar language. For example, subsection (2) states:

    If a coating line does not have an add-on emissions control
device for which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile
organic compounds per gallon of coating, minus water, as applied,
and if only 1 coating is used on the coating line during the
averaging time, then a person shall keep records. * * *

 .It is not clear from the wording of the rule if the emission limits
referred to are coating line emission limits or control device emission
limits. If the intention is that the emission limits, and the units in
which they are expressed, refer to the coating line, clearer wording is
advisable. For example, the requirement could be expressed as follows:

    If a coating line for which emission limits are expressed in
pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of coating, minus
water, as applied, does not have an add-on emissions control device,
and if only 1 coating is used on the coating line during the
averaging time, then a person shall keep records. * * *.

III. What Action Is EPA Taking?

    To determine the approvability of a rule, EPA must evaluate the
rule for consistency with the requirements of the CAA, EPA regulations
and the EPA's interpretation of these requirements as expressed in EPA
policy guidance documents. While we understand the concerns raised by
MDEQ, Rules R 336.1602 and R 336.2041 remain inconsistent with the CAA
and the applicable policies by which EPA must evaluate submittals,
including, ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies
and Deviations, Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 1987
Federal Register Notice,'' dated May 25, 1988. Therefore, EPA is
finalizing its disapproval of rules R 336.1602 and R 336.2041. We are
also finalizing our approval of the remainder of the rules submitted by
the State.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget.

Executive Order 13211 Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly
Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    Because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866 or a ``significant energy action,'' this action
is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.).

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Because this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state
law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that
required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).

Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments

    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action also does not have Federalism implications because it
does not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air
Act.

Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks

    This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.

National Technology Transfer Advancement Act

    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTA), 15 U.S.C. 272, requires Federal agencies to use
technical standards that are developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus to carry out policy objectives, so long as such standards are
not inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impracticable. In
reviewing program submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the Act. Absent a prior
existing requirement for the state to use voluntary consensus
standards, EPA has no authority to disapprove a program submission for
failure to use such standards, and it would thus be inconsistent with
applicable law for EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in place of
a program submission that otherwise satisfies the

provisions of the Act. Therefore, the requirements of section 12(d) of
the NTTA do not apply.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).

Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 31, 2006. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See Section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: April 12, 2006.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, part 52, chapter I, of title 40
of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart X--Michigan

0
2. Section 52.1170 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(122) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.1170  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (122) On April 3, 2003, May 28, 2003, September 17, 2004, October
25, 2004 and June 8, 2005, Michigan submitted revisions to the State
Implementation
    Plan which affect the following sections of the Michigan
Administrative Code: Part 3: Emission Limitations and Prohibitions--
Particulate Matter; Part 4: Emission Limitations and Prohibitions--
Sulfur-bearing Compounds; Part 6: Emission Limitations and
Prohibitions--Existing Sources of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions;
Part 7: Emission Limitations and Prohibitions--New Sources of Volatile
Organic Compound Emissions; Part 9: Emission Limitations and
Prohibitions--Miscellaneous; Part 10: Intermittent Testing and
Sampling; and Part 11: Continuous Emission Monitoring.
    (i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of the
Michigan Administrative Code are incorporated by reference.
    (A) Revisions to the following provisions of the Michigan
Administrative Code, effective April 30, 1998:
    (1) R 336.1358 Roof monitor visible emissions at steel
manufacturing facilities from electric arc furnaces and blast furnaces.
    (2) R 336.1361 Visible emissions from blast furnace casthouse
operations at steel manufacturing facilities.
    (3) R 336.1362 Visible emissions from electric arc furnace
operations at steel manufacturing facilities.
    (4) R 336.1363 Visible emissions from argon-oxygen decarburization
operations at steel manufacturing facilities.
    (B) R 336.1625 Emission of volatile organic compound from existing
equipment utilized in manufacturing synthesized pharmaceutical
products, filed with the Secretary of State on November 14, 2000 and
effective November 30, 2000.
    (C) Revisions to the following provisions of the Michigan
Administrative Code, filed with the Secretary of State March 11, 2002
and effective March 19, 2002:
    (1) R 336.1301 Standards for density of emissions.
    (2) R 336.1303 Grading visible emissions.
    (3) R 336.1330 Electrostatic precipitator control systems.
    (4) R 336.1331 Emission of particulate matter, except C8 of Table
31.
    (5) R 336.1371 Fugitive dust control programs other than areas
listed in table 36.
    (6) R 336.1372 Fugitive dust control program; required activities;
typical control methods.
    (7) R 336.1374 Particulate matter contingency measures; area listed
in table 37.
    (8) R 336.1401 Emission of sulfur dioxide from power plants.
    (9) R 336.1403 Oil- and natural gas-producing or transporting
facilities and natural gas-processing facilities; emissions; operation.
    (10) R 336.1601 Definitions.
    (11) R 336.1604 Storage of organic compounds having true vapor
pressure of more than 1.5 psia, but less than 11 psia, in existing
fixed roof stationary vessels of more than 40,000-gallon capacity.
    (12) R 336.1605 Storage of organic compounds having true vapor
pressure of 11 or more psia in existing stationary vessels of more than
40,000-gallon capacity.
    (13) R 336.1606 Loading gasoline into existing stationary vessels
of more than 2,000-gallon capacity at dispensing facilities handling
250,000 or more gallons per year.
    (14) R 336.1607 Loading gasoline into existing stationary vessels
of more than 2,000-gallon capacity at loading facilities.
    (15) R 336.1608 Loading gasoline into delivery vessels at existing
loading facilities handling less than 5,000,000 gallons per year.
    (16) R 336.1615 Existing vacuum-producing systems at petroleum
refineries.
    (17) R 336.1616 Process unit turnarounds at petroleum refineries.
    (18) R 336.1617 Existing organic compound-water separators at
petroleum refineries.
    (19) R 336.1618 Use of cutback paving asphalt.
    (20) R 336.1619 Standards for perchloroethylene dry cleaning
equipment; adoption of standards by reference.
    (21) R 336.1622 Emission of volatile organic compounds from
existing components of petroleum refineries; refinery monitoring
program.
    (22) R 336.1623 Storage of petroleum liquids having a true vapor
pressure of more than 1.0 psia, but less than 11.0 psia, in existing
external floating roof stationary vessels of more than 40,000-gallon
capacity.
    (23) R 336.1627 Delivery vessels; vapor collection systems.

    (24) R 336.1628 Emission of volatile organic compounds from
components of existing process equipment used in manufacturing
synthetic organic chemicals and polymers; monitoring program.
    (25) R 336.1629 Emission of volatile organic compounds from
components of existing process equipment used in processing natural
gas; monitoring program.
    (26) R 336.1630 Emission of volatile organic compounds from
existing paint manufacturing processes.
    (27) R 336.1631 Emission of volatile organic compounds from
existing process equipment utilized in manufacture of polystyrene or
other organic resins.
    (28) R 336.1702 New sources of volatile organic compound emissions
generally.
    (29) R 336.1705 Loading gasoline into delivery vessels at new
loading facilities handling less than 5,000,000 gallons per year.
    (30) R 336.1906 Diluting and concealing emissions.
    (31) R 336.1911 Malfunction abatement plans.
    (32) R 336.1930 Emission of carbon monoxide from ferrous cupola
operations.
    (33) R 336.2001 Performance tests by owner.
    (34) R 336.2002 Performance tests by department.
    (35) R 336.2003 Performance test criteria.
    (36) R 336.2004 Appendix A; reference test methods; adoption of
Federal reference test methods.
    (37) R 336.2005 Reference test methods for delivery vessels.
    (38) R 336.2007 Alternate version of procedure L, referenced in R
336.2040(10).
    (39) R 336.2013 Reference test method 5D.
    (40) R 336.2021 Figures.
    (41) R 336.2040 Method for determination of volatile organic
compound emissions from coating lines and graphic arts lines, except
subrules (9) and (10).
    (42) R 336.2101 Continuous emission monitoring, fossil fuel-fired
steam generators.
    (43) R 336.2150 Performance specifications for continuous emission
monitoring systems.
    (44) R 336.2155 Monitor location for continuous emission monitoring
systems.
    (45) R 336.2159 Alternative continuous emission monitoring systems.
    (46) R 336.2170 Monitoring data reporting and recordkeeping.
    (47) R 336.2189 Alternative data reporting or reduction procedures.
    (48) R 336.2190 Monitoring system malfunctions.
    (D) Revisions to the following provisions of the Michigan
Administrative Code, effective October 15, 2004:
    (1) R 336.2012 Reference test method 5C.
    (2) R 336.2014 Reference test method 5E.
    (3) R 336.2175 Data reduction procedures for fossil fuel-fired
steam generators.
    (E) R 336.2011 Reference test method 5B, filed with the Secretary
of State on April 21, 2005 and effective April 29, 2005.

[FR Doc. 06-4985 Filed 5-31-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


     UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

                             OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY
AND POLLUTION PREVENTION
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

RE:  	Meeting with the National Electronic Manufacturers Association on the Regulation of Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic Chemicals Under TSCA Section 6(h)
List of Contents
 Meeting Summary
 Attendees

Meeting Summary

On July 25, 2022, representatives from EPA met with the National Electronic Manufacturers Association (NEMA) to discuss comments submitted in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2021-0598 on the Regulation of Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic Chemicals Under TSCA Section 6(h); Phenol, Isopropylated Phosphate (3:1); Compliance Date Extension, published March 8, 2022. During the meeting, NEMA gave an overview of their memberships' concerns regarding the upcoming compliance deadline for the for processing and distribution in commerce and the associated recordkeeping requirements for PIP (3:1) in certain articles. NEMA also presented on their use of PIP (3:1) in new and replacement parts for motor vehicles. Additionally, NEMA reiterated that their industry is having major difficulties with identifying and replacing articles that contain PIP (3:1). EPA gave an overview of the TSCA section 6(h) rulemaking activities to date. NEMA indicated they would continue engaging with the EPA rulemaking process.

Attendees
EPA:
Niva Kramek
Cindy Wheeler
Gabriela Rossner

NEMA:
Fern Abrams
Stephen Gordon