[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 94 (Friday, May 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27943-27944]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11766]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC15-136-000.
    Applicants: BTMU Capital Leasing & Finance, Inc.
    Description: Application of BTMU Capital Leasing & Finance, Inc.
for authorization under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act and
Request For expedited Action.
    Filed Date: 5/11/15.
    Accession Number: 20150511-5054.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/1/15.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2074-004; ER10-2097-006.
    Applicants: Kansas City Power & Light Company, KCP&L Greater
Missouri Operations Company.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of Kansas City
Power & Light Company, et al.
    Filed Date: 5/8/15.
    Accession Number: 20150508-5207.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2488-010.
    Applicants: Oasis Power Partners, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change of Status of Oasis Power
Partners, LLC.
    Filed Date: 5/8/15.
    Accession Number: 20150508-5240.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-47-005; ER12-1540-003; ER12-1541-003; ER12-
1542-003; ER12-1544-003; ER10-2981-005; ER14-2475-002; ER14-2476-002;
ER14-2477-002; ER11-46-008; ER14-594-005; ER10-2975-008; ER11-41-005;
ER12-2343-003; ER13-1896-008.
    Applicants: Appalachian Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power
Company, Kentucky Power Company, Kingsport Power Company, Wheeling

Power Company, AEP Texas Central Company, AEP Texas North Company,
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Southwestern Electric Power
Company, Ohio Power Company, AEP Energy Partners, Inc., CSW Energy
Services, Inc., AEP Retail Energy Partners LLC, AEP Energy, Inc., AEP
Generation Resources Inc.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of the AEP MBR
Companies.
    Filed Date: 5/8/15.
    Accession Number: 20150508-5246.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2310-004.
    Applicants: Zephyr Wind, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing per 35: Compliance to 3 to be
effective 5/9/2015.
    Filed Date: 5/11/15.
    Accession Number: 20150511-5002.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/1/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1691-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii):
Amendment to RS 200 FRPPA NCEMPA to be effective 12/10/2014.
    Filed Date: 5/11/15.
    Accession Number: 20150511-5050.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/1/15.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES15-30-000.
    Applicants: The United Illuminating Company.
    Description: Application requesting authorization to issue short-
term debt securities in an amount not to exceed $400 million of The
United Illuminating Company.
    Filed Date: 5/8/15.
    Accession Number: 20150508-5243.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/15.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and Sec.  385.214) on or
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests
may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to
the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 11, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-11766 Filed 5-14-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 17927]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06051]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Hazardous Materials: Notice of Applications for Modification to
Special Permits

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: List of applications for modification of special permits.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations, notice is hereby given
that the Office of Hazardous Materials Safety has received the
application described herein.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 10, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Record Center, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
20590.
    Comments should refer to the application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of comments is desired, include
a self-addressed stamped postcard showing the special permit number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Burger, Chief, Office of
Hazardous Materials Safety General Approvals and Permits Branch,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department
of Transportation, East Building, PHH-13, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
Southeast, Washington, DC 20590-0001,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Each mode of transportation for which a
particular special permit is requested is indicated by a number in the
``Nature of Application'' portion of the table below as follows: 1--
Motor vehicle, 2--Rail freight, 3--Cargo vessel, 4--Cargo aircraft
only, 5--Passenger-carrying aircraft.
    Copies of the applications are available for inspection in the
Records Center, East Building, PHH-13, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
Southeast, Washington, DC or at http://regulations.gov.
    This notice of receipt of applications for special permit is
published in accordance with part 107 of the Federal hazardous
materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 6, 2023.
Donald P. Burger,
Chief, General Approvals and Permits Branch.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Nature of the special permits
       Application No.                 Applicant          Regulation(s) affected              thereof
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Special Permits Data
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10887-M......................  National Aeronautics and  173.314.................  To modify the special permit
                                Space Administration.                               to authorize an updated
                                                                                rupture disc and relief
                                                                                valve and updated
                                                                                transportation routes. (mode
                                                                                1).
11818-M......................  Lockheed Martin           172.101(j),               To modify the special permit
                                Corporation.              172.101(j)(1),            to authorize an additional
                                                          173.301(f),               hazardous material. (modes
                                                          173.304a(a)(2).           1, 3, 4).
15773-M......................  Roche Molecular Systems,  173.242(e)(1)...........  To modify the special permit
                                Inc.                                                to remove the requirement
                                                                                that the special permit
                                                                                accompany the shipment.
                                                                                (modes 1, 3).
16061-M......................  Cirba Solutions Services  172.102(c)(1), 172.200,   To modify the special permit
                                US, LLC.                  172.300, 172.400,         to remove the lithium
                                                          172.500, 172.600,         battery marking requirement.
                                                          172.700(a),               (modes 1, 3).
                                                          173.159a(c)(2),
                                                          173.185(c)(1)(iii),
                                                          173.185(c)(1)(iv),
                                                          173.185(c)(1)(v),
                                                          173.185(c)(3).
20356-M......................  Tesla, Inc..............  172.101(j)..............  To modify the special permit
                                                                                to authorize an additional
                                                                                cell type. (mode 4).
20493-M......................  Tesla, Inc..............  172.101(j)..............  To modify the special permit
                                                                                to authorize an additional
                                                                                cell type. (mode 4).
20567-M......................  Omni Tanker Pty. Ltd....  107.503(b), 107.503(c),   To modify the special permit
                                                          172.102(c)(3), 173.241,   to authorize additional
                                                          173.242, 173.243,         inner barrier materials.
                                                          178.345-1, 178.347-1,     (mode 1).
                                                          178.348-1.
20936-M......................  CO2 Exchange LLC........  171.2(k), 172.200,        To modify the special permit
                                                          172.300, 172.400,         to authorize a larger
                                                          172.700(a).               cylinder, a smaller marking,
                                                                                and more cylinders per
                                                                                package. (modes 1, 2).
21359-M......................  Thales Alenia Space.....  172.101(j), 172.300,      To modify the special permit
                                                          172.400, 173.301(f),      to authorize cargo vessel.
                                                          173.302a(a)(1),           (mode 3).
                                                          173.304a(a)(2), 173.56,
                                                          173.185(a)(1).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2023-06051 Filed 3-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


RED FACTS; Propiconazole EPA 738R 06 027 Pesticide Reregistration July 18, 2006 The Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) has completed a reregistration eligibility decision ( RED) for the pesticide active ingredient propiconazole. When a pesticide is eligible for reregistration, EPA explains the basis for its decision in a RED document. This fact sheet summarizes the information in the RED document for the pesticide propiconazole, case number 3125.

All pesticides sold or distributed in the United States must be registered by EPA, based on scientific studies showing that they can be used without posing unreasonable risks to people or the environment. Because of advances in scientific knowledge, the law requires that pesticides first registered before November 1, 1984, be reregistered to ensure that they meet today's more stringent standards.

In evaluating pesticides for reregistration, EPA obtains and reviews a complete set of studies from pesticide producers that describe the human health and environmental effects of each pesticide. To implement provisions of the Food Quality Protection Act ( FQPA) of 1996, EPA considers the special sensitivity of infants and children to pesticides, as well as aggregate exposure of the public to pesticide residues from all sources, and the cumulative effects of pesticides and other compounds with common mechanisms of toxicity. The Agency develops any mitigation measures or regulatory controls needed to effectively reduce each pesticide's risks. EPA then reregisters pesticides that meet current human health and safety standards and can be used without posing unreasonable risks to human health and the environment.

Regulatory History and Background   Propiconazole was first registered in 1981.   Propiconazole belongs to a group of pesticides called triazoles ( or conazoles), which also includes the triazole fungicides subject to reregistration, triadimefon, and triadimenol. The triazole fungicides share common metabolites, the free triazole compounds 1,2,4 triazole, triazole alanine, and triazole acetic acid, which are considered in the Agency's assessments.   EPA has concluded that propiconazole does not share a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances.

Uses   Propiconazole is a fungicide and antimicrobial used to control various bacteria, fungi, and viruses, including plant pathogens and spoilage agents.   Propiconazole is used on agricultural crops, fruit and nut trees, ornamentals, and turf. Propiconzole is also used as a wood preservative and as an antimicrobial/ material preservative in adhesives, paints, coatings, leather, paper, textiles, and specialty industrial products. 2   Approximately 345,000 pounds of propiconazole active ingredient ( ai) were used annually from 1999 to 2004.   Propiconazole is not a Restricted Use Pesticide Health Effects   The liver is the target organ for propiconazole. Effects observed in multiple studies across species include liver lesions, increased liver weight, ballooned liver cells, and foci of enlarged hepatocytes. There were also increased incidences of rudimentary ribs and cleft palate malformations noted in rat and rabbit studies.   The Agency classified propiconazole as a Group C, possible human carcinogen, based on increased hepatocellular adenomas, combined adenomas/ carcinomas, and hepatocellular carcinomas in male mice in a chronic oral feeding study.

Ecological Effects   Propiconazole is classified as practically non toxic to birds and mammals on an acute basis.   On an acute basis, propiconazole is classified as highly toxic to freshwater fish and classified as slightly toxic to freshwater invertebrate.   On an acute basis, propiconazole is classified as moderately toxic to estuarine/ marine fish and classified as highly toxic to estuarine/ marine invertebrate.   Propiconazole showed low toxicity to plants. Athough several species of monocots and dicots were tested for effects of propiconazole on seedling emergence and vegetative vigor, effects were noted in only a few species.

Risk Summary Human Health Risks   Human health acute, short term, and chronic aggregate risks for propiconazole are below the Agency's level of concern. This includes risks from dietary exposure to residues in food and water, as well as residential risks.

Occupational Risks   For liquid formulations, handler risks for most scenarios are of concern for mixer/ loaders wearing baseline clothing ( long sleeve shirt, long pants, shoes, and socks), but these risks can be mitigated with the addition of chemical resistant gloves.   For wettable powder formulations, handler risks are not of concern provided that all products are packaged in water soluble bags.   Worker risks are of concern for workers applying paint containing propiconazole as an incan preservative; however, these risks are mitigated if the percent active ingredient is reduced.   There are no re entry risk of concern, provided workers comply with a 12 hour restricted entry interval ( REI). 3 Ecological Risks   Acute and chronic mammalian risk quotients ( RQs) for propiconazole are below the Agency's level of concern ( LOC) for all propiconazole uses except turf.   Avian acute RQs only exceed the Agency's LOC of 0.5 for turf and ornamental uses, when the smallest weight class of birds feed on short grass following multiple propiconazole applications. Avian chronic RQs exceed the LOC for turf and groundcover for all weight classes of birds feeding on short grass.   Propiconazole poses a potential risk to terrestrial plants for some uses.   The Agency's screening level risk assessment shows that RQs for both freshwater and estuarine/ marine fish do not exceed the acute LOC for any use, but exceed the listed species LOC for the rice use.   The use of propiconazole on rice and turf may present risk to non vascular estuarine/ marine plants; both the acute and listed species RQs exceed the LOC of 1. In addition, the use of propiconazole on rice may present an acute risk to freshwater nonvascular plants; the listed species RQs exceed the LOC of 1.

Risk Mitigation The following risk mitigation measures are required for propiocnazole to address risks of concern.

  Handlers mixing and loading liquid formulations of propiconazole for agricultural use must wear chemical resistant gloves;   Handlers applying liquid formulations of propiconazole using hand held equipment must wear chemical resistant gloves;   Wettable powder formulations of propiconazole must be packaged in water soluble bags;   Decrease the amount of propiconazole that may be used as a preservative in paint from 0.35% to 0.125% ai; and   Label restrictions to minimize spray drift, including restrictions on droplet size and application height.

Regulatory Conclusion EPA has determined that all supported uses of propiconazole are eligible for reregistration, provided that registrants implement risk mitigation measures described in the RED and make required changes to product labeling.

Because the technical registrants have requested that their registration be amended to delete use of propiconazole on apparel, carpet fibers, and home furnishings following uses, these uses were not considered, and are not eligible for reregistration: EPA issued a formal order deleting these uses on May 26, 2006. 4 Additional Data Requirements EPA is requiring the following additional generic studies for propiconazole to confirm the conclusions of this propiconazole RED decision:

Human Health OPPTS 860.1200 Directions for Use for Sunflower Breeder's Seed OPPTS 860.1500 Crop Field Trials for Sunflower Breeder's Seed OPPTS GDLN 870.7600 Dermal Penetration ( for Paint Containing Propiconazole)

OPPTS GDLN 875.1200 Dermal Exposure   Indoor, for the following scenarios: o Painters using brush/ roller o Painters using airless sprayer o Workers pressure treating wood o Workers handling treated wood OPPTS GDLN 875.1400 Inhalation Exposure   Indoor, for the following scenarios: o Painters using brush/ roller o Painters using airless sprayer o Workers pressure treating wood o Workers handling treated wood OPPTS GDLN 875.1100 Dermal Exposure   Outdoor, for painters using brush roller and airless sprayer OPPTS GDLN 875.1300 Inhalation Exposure   Outdoor, Outdoor, for painters using brush roller and airless sprayer Ecological Effects OPPTS GDLN 876.7200 Soil Residue Dissipation   modified for foliage dissipation Special Studies Dislodgeable Residues of Propiconzole from treated Wood ( wood wipe study for dimensional lumber) 5 For More Information Electronic copies of the Propiconazole RED and all supporting documents are available in Docket # EPA HQ OPP 2005 0497 at http:// www. regulations. gov. For more information about EPA's pesticide reregistration program, the Propiconazole RED, or reregistration of individual products containing propiconazole, please contact the Special Review and Reregistration Division ( 7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, US EPA, Washington, DC 20460, telephone 703 308 8000.

For information about the health effects of pesticides, or for assistance in recognizing and managing pesticide poisoning symptoms, please contact the National Pesticide Information Center ( NPIC). Call toll free 1 800 858 7378, from 6: 30 am to 4: 30 am Pacific Time, or 9: 30 am to 7: 30 pm Eastern Standard Time, seven days a week. The NPIC internet address is http:// npic. orst. edu.


[Federal Register: July 16, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 135)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 34511-34513]
[DOCID:fr16jy09-6]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0616; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-070-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; 328 Support Services GmbH Dornier Model
328-100 and -300 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    A recent incident has been reported with a Dornier 328-100
aeroplane, where the right-hand (RH) power lever jammed in flight-
idle position during the landing roll-out. The aeroplane was stopped
by excessive braking.
    The investigation by the operator revealed that the cockpit door
locking device * * * had fallen off the RH cockpit wall and blocked
the RH power/condition lever pulley/cable cluster below the door. *
* *
    This condition, if not corrected, could cause interference with
the engine- and/or flight control cables, possibly resulting in
reduced control of the aeroplane.
* * * * *

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 17, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5

p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact 328
Support Services GmbH, Global Support Center, P.O. Box 1252, D-82231
Wessling, Federal Republic of Germany; telephone +49 8153 88111 6666;
fax +49 8153 88111 6565; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://
www.328support.de. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Groves, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1503; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0616;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-070-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2009-0082, dated April 7, 2009 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    A recent incident has been reported with a Dornier 328-100
aeroplane, where the right-hand (RH) power lever jammed in flight-
idle position during the landing roll-out. The aeroplane was stopped
by excessive braking.
    The investigation by the operator revealed that the cockpit door
locking device Part Number 001A252A3914012 had fallen off the RH
cockpit wall and blocked the RH power/condition lever pulley/cable
cluster below the door. Although the affected aeroplane had been
modified, the technical investigation showed that a loose Cockpit
Door Locking device could also occur on 328-100 and 328-300
aeroplanes with a standard installation.
    This condition, if not corrected, could cause interference with
the engine- and/or flight control cables, possibly resulting in
reduced control of the aeroplane.
    For the reasons described above, this AD requires a one-time
inspection of the cockpit door locking device and the surrounding
area [for proper installation] and the reporting of all findings to
the TC [type certificate] holder. This AD is considered to be an
interim action and the retrofit of a new design may be implemented
later.

The corrective action is re-torquing the attachment screws. You may
obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    328 Support Services GmbH has issued Service Bulletins SB-328-25-
485 and SB-328J-25-235, both dated January 28, 2009. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 69 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $5,520, or $80 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;

    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

328 Support Services GmbH (Formerly, AvCraft Aerospace GmbH,
Formerly Fairchild Dornier GmbH, Formerly Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH):
Docket No. FAA-2009-0616; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-070-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments August 17, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to all 328 Support Services GmbH Dornier
Model 328-100 and -300 airplanes, certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 25:
Equipment/furnishings.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    A recent incident has been reported with a Dornier 328-100
aeroplane, where the right-hand (RH) power lever jammed in flight-
idle position during the landing roll-out. The aeroplane was stopped
by excessive braking.
    The investigation by the operator revealed that the cockpit door
locking device Part Number 001A252A3914012 had fallen off the RH
cockpit wall and blocked the RH power/condition lever pulley/cable
cluster below the door. Although the affected aeroplane had been
modified, the technical investigation showed that a loose Cockpit
Door Locking device could also occur on 328-100 and 328-300
aeroplanes with a standard installation.
    This condition, if not corrected, could cause interference with
the engine- and/or flight control cables, possibly resulting in
reduced control of the aeroplane.
    For the reasons described above, this AD requires a one-time
inspection of the cockpit door locking device and the surrounding
area [for proper installation] and the reporting of all findings to
the TC [type certificate] holder. This AD is considered to be an
interim action and the retrofit of a new design may be implemented
later.

    The corrective action is re-torquing the attachment screws.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD, do a
detailed visual inspection of the cockpit door locking device and
the surrounding area for proper installation, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of 328 Support Services Service Bulletin
SB-328-25-485 or SB-328J-25-235, both dated January 28, 2009, as
applicable.
    (2) If any discrepancy is found during the inspection specified
in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, before further flight, do the
corrective action in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of 328 Support Services Service Bulletin SB-328-25-485 or SB-328J-
25-235, both dated January 28, 2009, as applicable.
    (3) Submit a report of the findings (both positive and negative)
of the inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD to the
Manager, Attention Dept P1, 328 Support Services GmbH, Customer
Services, P.O.B. 1252, D-82231 Wessling, Fed. Rep. of Germany; Fax
+49 (0) 8153 88111-6565, at the applicable time specified in
paragraph (f)(3)(i) or (f)(3)(ii) of this AD. The report must
include the inspection results, a description of any discrepancies
found, the airplane serial number, and the number of landings and
flight hours on the airplane.
    (i) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the inspection.
    (ii) If the inspection was accomplished prior to the effective
date of this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the
effective date of this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1:  This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Standards, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to Attn: Tom
Groves, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal
avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Airworthiness Directive 2009-0082, dated April 7, 2009; and 328
Support Services Service Bulletins SB-328-25-485 and SB-328J-25-235,
both dated January 28, 2009; for related information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 6, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-16940 Filed 7-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 26014]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10571]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-1609-000]

Kiyoshi Technologies, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding,
of Kiyoshi Technologies, LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability is May 20, 2015.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 30, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-10571 Filed 5-5-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: July 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 130)]
[Notices]
[Page 39315-39319]
[DOCID:fr08jy10-140]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-62428; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2010-081]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval to a Proposed
Rule Change To Extend the Last Sale Data Feeds Pilot Program

July 1, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 30, 2010, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons, and is approving the
proposal on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    NASDAQ is proposing to extend for three months the pilot that
created the NASDAQ Last Sale (``NLS'') market data products. NLS allows
data distributors to have access to real-time market data for a capped
fee, enabling those distributors to provide free access to the data to
millions of individual investors via the Internet and television.
Specifically, NASDAQ offers the ``NASDAQ Last Sale for NASDAQ'' and
``NASDAQ Last Sale for NYSE/Amex'' data feeds containing last sale
activity in U.S. equities within the NASDAQ Market Center and reported
to the jointly-operated FINRA/NASDAQ Trade Reporting Facility (``FINRA/
NASDAQ TRF''). The purpose of this proposal is to extend the existing
pilot program for a three-month period beginning on July 1, 2010.
    This pilot program supports the aspiration of Regulation NMS to
increase the availability of proprietary data by allowing market forces
to determine the amount of proprietary market data information that is
made available to the public and at what price. During the current
pilot period, the program has vastly increased the availability of
NASDAQ proprietary market data to individual investors. Based upon data
from NLS distributors, NASDAQ believes that since its launch in July
2008, the NLS data has been viewed by over 50,000,000 investors on Web
sites operated by Google, Interactive Data, and Dow Jones, among
others.
    The text of the proposed rule change is below. Proposed new
language is in italics; proposed deletions are in brackets.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Changes are marked to the rule text that appears in the
electronic NASDAQ Manual found at http: //
nasdaqomx.cchwallstreet.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

7039. NASDAQ Last Sale Data Feeds

    (a) For a [six] three month pilot period commencing on [January]
July 1, 2010, NASDAQ shall offer two proprietary data feeds
containing real-time last sale information for trades executed on
NASDAQ or reported to the NASDAQ/FINRA Trade Reporting Facility.
    (1) ``NASDAQ Last Sale for NASDAQ'' shall contain all
transaction reports for NASDAQ-listed stocks; and
    (2) ``NASDAQ Last Sale for NYSE/Amex'' shall contain all such
transaction reports for NYSE- and NYSE Amex-listed stocks.
    (b)-(c) No change.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NASDAQ included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item III below. NASDAQ has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Prior to the launch of NLS, public investors that wished to view
market data to monitor their portfolios generally had two choices: (1)
Pay for real-time market data or (2) use free data that is 15 to 20
minutes delayed. To increase consumer choice, NASDAQ proposed a pilot
to offer access to real-time market data to data distributors for a
capped fee, enabling those distributors to disseminate the data via the
Internet and television at no cost to millions of Internet users and
television viewers. NASDAQ now proposes a three-month extension of that
pilot program on the same terms as applicable today.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ NASDAQ previously stated that it would file a proposed rule
change seeking permanent approval of the NLS pilot. NASDAQ has also
informed Commission staff that it will consult with FINRA to develop
a proposed rule change by FINRA to seek permanent Commission
approval for inclusion of FINRA/NASDAQ TRF data in NLS. Because
NASDAQ and FINRA have not completed their consultations regarding
such a proposed rule change, NASDAQ is not yet in a position to file
for permanent approval of NLS. Accordingly, NASDAQ is filing to seek
a three-month extension of the existing pilot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The NLS pilot created two separate ``Level 1'' products containing
last sale activity within the NASDAQ market and reported to the
jointly-operated FINRA/NASDAQ TRF. First, the ``NASDAQ Last Sale for
NASDAQ Data Product,'' a real-time data feed that provides real-time
last sale information including execution price, volume, and time for
executions occurring within the NASDAQ system as well as those reported
to the FINRA/NASDAQ TRF. Second, the NASDAQ Last Sale for NYSE/Amex
data product that provides real-time last sale information including
execution price, volume, and time for NYSE- and NYSE Amex-securities
executions occurring within the NASDAQ system as well as those reported
to the FINRA/NASDAQ TRF.
    NASDAQ established two different pricing models, one for clients
that are able to maintain username/password entitlement systems and/or
quote counting mechanisms to account for usage, and a second for those
that are not. Firms with the ability to maintain username/password
entitlement systems and/or quote counting mechanisms will be eligible
for a specified fee schedule for the NASDAQ Last Sale for NASDAQ
Product and a separate fee schedule for the NASDAQ Last Sale for NYSE/
Amex Product: Firms that were unable to maintain username/password
entitlement systems and/or quote counting mechanisms will also have
multiple options for purchasing the NASDAQ Last Sale data. These firms
chose between a ``Unique Visitor'' model for Internet delivery or a
``Household'' model for television delivery. Unique Visitor and
Household populations must be reported monthly and must be validated by
a third-party vendor or ratings agency approved by NASDAQ at NASDAQ's
sole discretion. In addition, to reflect the growing confluence between
these media outlets, NASDAQ offered a reduction in fees when a single
distributor distributes NASDAQ Last Sale Data Products via multiple
distribution mechanisms.
    Second, NASDAQ established a cap on the monthly fee, currently set
at $50,000 per month for all NASDAQ Last Sale products. The fee cap
enables NASDAQ to compete effectively against other exchanges that also
offer last sale data for purchase or at no charge.
    As with the distribution of other NASDAQ proprietary products, all
distributors of the NASDAQ Last Sale for NASDAQ and/or NASDAQ Last Sale
for NYSE/Amex products would pay a single $1,500/month NASDAQ Last Sale
Distributor Fee in addition to any applicable usage fees. The $1,500
monthly fee will apply to all distributors and will not vary based on
whether the distributor distributes the data internally or externally
or

distributes the data via both the Internet and television.
2. Statutory Basis
    NASDAQ believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\5\ in general, and with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,\6\ in particular, in that it provides an equitable
allocation of reasonable fees among users and recipients of NASDAQ
data. In adopting Regulation NMS, the Commission granted self-
regulatory organizations and broker-dealers increased authority and
flexibility to offer new and unique market data to the public. It was
believed that this authority would expand the amount of data available
to consumers, and also spur innovation and competition for the
provision of market data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The NASDAQ Last Sale market data products proposed here appear to
be precisely the sort of market data product that the Commission
envisioned when it adopted Regulation NMS. The Commission concluded
that Regulation NMS--by lessening regulation of the market in
proprietary data--would itself further the Act's goals of facilitating
efficiency and competition:

    [E]fficiency is promoted when broker-dealers who do not need the
data beyond the prices, sizes, market center identifications of the
NBBO and consolidated last sale information are not required to
receive (and pay for) such data. The Commission also believes that
efficiency is promoted when broker-dealers may choose to receive
(and pay for) additional market data based on their own internal
analysis of the need for such data.\7\

    \7\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70
FR 37496 (June 29, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    By removing ``unnecessary regulatory restrictions'' on the ability
of exchanges to sell their own data, Regulation NMS advanced the goals
of the Act and the principles reflected in its legislative history. If
the free market should determine whether proprietary data is sold to
broker-dealers at all, it follows that the price at which such data is
sold should be set by the market as well.
    NASDAQ's ability to price its Last Sale Data Products is
constrained by (1) competition between exchanges and other trading
platforms that compete with each other in a variety of dimensions; (2)
the existence of inexpensive real-time consolidated data and free
delayed consolidated data, and (3) the inherent contestability of the
market for proprietary last sale data.
    The market for proprietary last sale data products is currently
competitive and inherently contestable because there is fierce
competition for the inputs necessary to the creation of proprietary
data and strict pricing discipline for the proprietary products
themselves. Numerous exchanges compete with each other for listings,
trades, and market data itself, providing virtually limitless
opportunities for entrepreneurs who wish to produce and distribute
their own market data. This proprietary data is produced by each
individual exchange, as well as other entities, in a vigorously
competitive market.
    Broker-dealers currently have numerous alternative venues for their
order flow, including ten self-regulatory organization (``SRO'')
markets, as well as internalizing broker-dealers (``BDs'') and various
forms of alternative trading systems (``ATSs''), including dark pools
and electronic communication networks (``ECNs''). Each SRO market
competes to produce transaction reports via trade executions, and two
FINRA-regulated Trade Reporting Facilities (``TRFs'') compete to
attract internalized transaction reports. It is common for BDs to
further and exploit this competition by sending their order flow and
transaction reports to multiple markets, rather than providing them all
to a single market. Competitive markets for order flow, executions, and
transaction reports provide pricing discipline for the inputs of
proprietary data products.
    The large number of SROs, TRFs, BDs, and ATSs that currently
produce proprietary data or are currently capable of producing it
provides further pricing discipline for proprietary data products. Each
SRO, TRF, ATS, and BD is currently permitted to produce proprietary
data products, and many currently do or have announced plans to do so,
including NASDAQ, NYSE, NYSE Amex, NYSEArca, and BATS.
    Any ATS or BD can combine with any other ATS, BD, or multiple ATSs
or BDs to produce joint proprietary data products. Additionally, order
routers and market data vendors can facilitate single or multiple
broker-dealers' production of proprietary data products. The potential
sources of proprietary products are virtually limitless.
    The fact that proprietary data from ATSs, BDs, and vendors can by-
pass SROs is significant in two respects. First, non-SROs can compete
directly with SROs for the production and sale of proprietary data
products, as BATS and Arca did before registering as exchanges by
publishing proprietary book data on the Internet. Second, because a
single order or transaction report can appear in an SRO proprietary
product, a non-SRO proprietary product, or both, the data available in
proprietary products is exponentially greater than the actual number of
orders and transaction reports that exist in the marketplace.
    Consolidated data provides two additional measures of pricing
discipline for proprietary data products that are a subset of the
consolidated data stream. First, the consolidated data is widely
available in real-time at $1 per month for non-professional users.
Second, consolidated data is also available at no cost with a 15- or
20- minute delay. Because consolidated data contains marketwide
information, it effectively places a cap on the fees assessed for
proprietary data (such as last sale data) that is simply a subset of
the consolidated data. The mere availability of low-cost or free
consolidated data provides a powerful form of pricing discipline for
proprietary data products that contain data elements that are a subset
of the consolidated data, by highlighting the optional nature of
proprietary products.
    Market data vendors provide another form of price discipline for
proprietary data products because they control the primary means of
access to end users. Vendors impose price restraints based upon their
business models. For example, vendors such as Bloomberg and Reuters
that assess a surcharge on data they sell may refuse to offer
proprietary products that end users will not purchase in sufficient
numbers. Internet portals, such as Google, impose a discipline by
providing only data that will enable them to attract ``eyeballs'' that
contribute to their advertising revenue. Retail broker-dealers, such as
Schwab and Fidelity, offer their customers proprietary data only if it
promotes trading and generates sufficient commission revenue. Although
the business models may differ, these vendors' pricing discipline is
the same: they can simply refuse to purchase any proprietary data
product that fails to provide sufficient value. NASDAQ and other
producers of proprietary data products must understand and respond to
these varying business models and pricing disciplines in order to
market proprietary data products successfully.
    In addition to the competition and price discipline described
above, the market for proprietary data products is also highly
contestable because market entry is rapid, inexpensive, and profitable.
The history of electronic trading is replete with examples entrants
that swiftly grew into some of the largest electronic trading platforms
and proprietary data producers: Archipelago, Bloomberg Tradebook,
Island, RediBook, Attain, TracECN,

BATS Trading and Direct Edge. Today, BATS publishes its data at no
charge on its Web site in order to attract order flow, and it uses
market data revenue rebates from the resulting executions to maintain
low execution charges for its users.\8\ A proliferation of dark pools
and other ATSs operate profitably with fragmentary shares of
consolidated market volume.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ However, BATS recently received approval to begin offering
and charging for three new data products, which include BATS Last
Sale Feed, BATS Historical Data Products, and a data product called
BATS Market Insight. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61885
(April 9, 2010), 75 FR 20018 (April 16, 2010) (SR-BATS-2010-002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulation NMS, by deregulating the market for proprietary data,
has increased the contestability of that market. While broker-dealers
have previously published their proprietary data individually,
Regulation NMS encourages market data vendors and broker-dealers to
produce proprietary products cooperatively in a manner never before
possible. Multiple market data vendors already have the capability to
aggregate data and disseminate it on a profitable scale, including
Bloomberg, Reuters and Thomson.
    In establishing the price for the NASDAQ Last Sale Products, NASDAQ
considered the competitiveness of the market for last sale data and all
of the implications of that competition. NASDAQ believes that it has
considered all relevant factors and has not considered irrelevant
factors in order to establish a fair, reasonable, and not unreasonably
discriminatory fee and an equitable allocation of fees among all users.
The existence of numerous alternatives to NLS, including real-time
consolidated data, free delayed consolidated data, and proprietary data
from other sources ensures that NASDAQ cannot set unreasonable fees, or
fees that are unreasonably discriminatory, without losing business to
these alternatives. Accordingly, NASDAQ believes that the acceptance of
the NLS product in the marketplace demonstrates the consistency of
these fees with applicable statutory standards.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    NASDAQ does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. To the contrary,
the NASDAQ Last Sale Products respond to and enhance competition that
already exists in the market.
    On May 28, 2008, the Internet portal Yahoo! began offering its Web
site viewers real-time last sale data provided by BATS Trading.
NASDAQ's last sale data products compete directly with the BATS product
disseminated via Yahoo! In addition, as set forth above, the market for
last sale data is already competitive, with both real-time and delayed
consolidated data as well as the ability for innumerable entities begin
rapidly and inexpensively to offer competitive last sale data products.
Moreover, the New York Stock Exchange distributes competing last sale
data products at a price comparable to the price of NLS. Under the
regime of Regulation NMS, there is no limit to the number of competing
products that can be developed quickly and at low cost. The Commission
should not stand in the way of enhanced competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Three comment letters were filed regarding the proposed rule change
as originally published for comment NASDAQ responded to these comments
in a letter dated December 13, 2007. Both the comment letters and
NASDAQ's response are available on the SEC Web site at http://
www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nasdaq-2006-060/nasdaq2006060.shtml.

III. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2010-081 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2010-081. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, on
official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies
of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2010-081 and should be submitted on or before
July 29, 2010.

IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a
Proposed Rule Change

    The Commission finds that the proposed rule change, to extend the
pilot program for three months, is consistent with the requirements of
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a
national securities exchange.\9\ In particular, it is consistent with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\10\ which requires that the rules of a
national securities exchange provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members and issuers
and other parties using its facilities, and Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,\11\ which requires, among other things, that the rules of a
national securities exchange be designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general,
to protect investors and the public interest, and not be designed to
permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission also finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the provisions of Section 6(b)(8) of the

Act,\12\ which requires that the rules of an exchange not impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. Finally, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with Rule 603(a) of Regulation
NMS,\13\ adopted under Section 11A(c)(1) of the Act, which requires an
exclusive processor that distributes information with respect to
quotations for or transactions in an NMS stock to do so on terms that
are fair and reasonable and that are not unreasonably
discriminatory.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
    \13\ 17 CFR 242.603(a).
    \14\ NASDAQ is an exclusive processor of its last sale data
under Section 3(a)(22)(B) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(22)(B), which
defines an exclusive processor as, among other things, an exchange
that distributes data on an exclusive basis on its own behalf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission approved the fee for the NASDAQ Last Sale Data Feeds
for a pilot period which ran until July 1, 2009.\15\ The Commission
notes that the Exchange proposes to extend the pilot program for three
months. The Commission did not receive any comments on the previous
extensions of the pilot program.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 61872 (April 8,
2010), 74 FR 19444 (April 14, 2010); 60990 (November 12, 2009), 74
FR 60002 (November 19, 2009); 57965 (June 16, 2008), 73 FR 35178
(June 20, 2008) (SR-NASDAQ-2006-060); 58894 (October 31, 2008), 73
FR 66953 (November 12, 2008) (SR-NASDAQ-2008-086); 59186 (December
30, 2008), 74 FR 743 (January 7, 2009) (SR-NASDAQ-2008-103); 59652
(March 31, 2009) 74 FR 15533 (April 6, 2009) (SR-NASDAQ-2009-027);
60201 (June 30, 2009), 74 FR 32670 (July 8, 2009) (SR-NASDAQ-2009-
062).
    \16\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 2, 2008, the Commission issued an approval order
(``Order'') that sets forth a market-based approach for analyzing
proposals by self-regulatory organizations to impose fees for ``non-
core'' market data products, such as the NASDAQ Last Sale Data
Feeds.\17\ The Commission believes that Nasdaq's proposal to
temporarily extend the pilot program to June 30, 2010 is consistent
with the Act for the reasons noted in the Order.\18\ The Commission
believes that approving NASDAQ's proposal to temporarily extend the
pilot program that imposes a fee for the NASDAQ Last Sale Data Feeds
for an additional three months will be beneficial to investors and in
the public interest, in that it is intended to allow continued broad
public dissemination of increased real-time pricing information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770 (December 9, 2008) (Order Setting Aside Action by
Delegated Authority and Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to
NYSE Arca Data).
    \18\ See supra note 15.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds good cause for approving the proposed rule
change before the thirtieth day after the date of publication of notice
of filing thereof in the Federal Register. Accelerating approval of
this proposal is expected to benefit investors by continuing to
facilitate their access to widespread, free, real-time pricing
information contained in the NASDAQ Last Sale Data Feeds. Therefore,
the Commission finds good cause, consistent with Section 19(b)(2) of
the Act,\19\ to approve the proposed rule change on an accelerated
basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,
that the proposed rule change (SR-NASDAQ-2010-045) is hereby approved
on an accelerated basis.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-16567 Filed 7-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71253-71254]
[FR Doc No: 2021-27156]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: December 16, 2021, 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: Open to the public via audio Webcast only. Join FERC online to
listen live at http://ferc.capitolconnection.org/.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Agenda.
    * NOTE--Items listed on the agenda may be deleted without further
notice.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For a recorded message listing items struck from or added to the
meeting, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    This is a list of matters to be considered by the Commission. It
does not include a listing of all documents relevant to the items on
the agenda. All public documents, however, may be viewed on line at the
Commission's website at https://elibrary.ferc.gov/eLibrary/search using
the eLibrary link.

                                          1085th Meeting--Open Meeting
                                         [December 16, 2021, 10:00 a.m.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Item No.                     Docket No.                                    Company
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 ADMINISTRATIVE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-1.....................  AD22-1-000......................  Agency Administrative Matters.
A-2.....................  AD22-2-000......................  Customer Matters, Reliability, Security and Market
                                                             Operations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    ELECTRIC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E-1.....................  RM20-16-000.....................  Managing Transmission Line Ratings.

E-2.....................  RM22-5-000......................  Rate Recovery, Reporting, and Accounting Treatment
                                                             of Industry Association Dues and Certain Civic,
                                                             Political, and Related Expenses.
E-3.....................  EL21-77-000.....................  Tenaska Clear Creek Wind, LLC v. Southwest Power
                                                             Pool, Inc.
E-4.....................  ER21-1225-003...................  Long Ridge Energy Generation LLC.
E-5.....................  Omitted.........................
E-6.....................  ER21-2965-000, ER21-2965-001....  PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., Atlantic City Electric
                                                             Company, Delmarva Power & Light Company, and PECO
                                                             Energy Company.
E-7.....................  ER21-1635-002...................  PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
E-8.....................  QF21-1213-000...................  Gallatin Power Partners, LLC.
E-9.....................  ER21-142-000....................  System Energy Resources, Inc.
E-10....................  ER22-187-000....................  Smoky Mountain Transmission LLC.
E-11....................  ER10-2564-011...................  Tucson Electric Power Company.
                          ER10-2600-011...................  UNS Electric, Inc.
                          ER10-2289-011...................  UniSource Energy Development Company.
                          EL22-5-000......................  Tucson Electric Power Company.
E-12....................  Omitted.........................
E-13....................  ER21-1772-001...................  PacifiCorp.
                          ER21-1774-001...................  Sierra Pacific Power Company.
                          ER21-1775-001...................  Nevada Power Company.
E-14....................  ER21-2676-000...................  Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
                          ER21-2677-000 (not consolidated)  Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
                          EL17-89-000.....................  American Electric Power Service Corporation v.
                                                             Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. and
                                                             Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
                          EL19-60-000 (consolidated)......  City of Prescott, Arkansas v. Southwestern Electric
                                                             Power Company and Midcontinent Independent System
                                                             Operator, Inc.
E-15....................  ER20-2471-003...................  NedPower Mount Storm, LLC.
E-16....................  EL21-100-000....................  Nebraska Public Power District v. Tri-State
                                                             Generation and Transmission Association, Inc., and
                                                             Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
E-17....................  EL21-60-000.....................  Arcadia Solar, LLC and WGL Georgia Project Group,
                                                             LLC.
                          QF21-480-001....................  Arcadia Solar, LLC.
                          QF21-481-001, QF21-482-001, QF21- WGL Georgia Project Group, LLC.
                           483-001.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       GAS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G-1.....................  IN17-4-000......................  Rover Pipeline LLC and Energy Transfer Partners,
                                                             L.P.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      HYDRO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
H-1.....................  RM20-9-000......................  Safety of Water Power Projects and Project Works.
H-2.....................  P-2042-191......................  Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille
                                                             County, Washington.
H-3.....................  P-2411-029......................  City of Danville, STS Hydropower, LLC, and Eagle
                                                             Creek Schoolfield, LLC.
H-4.....................  P-2570-033......................  AEP Generation Resources Inc. and Eagle Creek Racine
                                                             Hydro, LLC.
H-5.....................  P-2088-083......................  South Feather Water and Power Agency.
H-6.....................  P-943-134.......................  Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County,
                                                             Washington.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  Certificates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C-1.....................  CP17-458-010....................  Midship Pipeline Company, LLC.
C-2.....................  CP17-458-011....................  Midship Pipeline Company, LLC.
C-3.....................  CP17-458-012....................  Midship Pipeline Company, LLC.
C-4.....................  CP15-558-000, CP19-78-000, CP20-  PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC.
                           47-000.
C-5.....................  CP17-494-004....................  Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline, LP.
                          CP17-495-004....................  Jordan Cove Energy Project L.P.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The public is invited to listen to the meeting live at http://ferc.capitolconnection.org/. Anyone with internet access who desires to
hear this event can do so by navigating to www.ferc.gov's Calendar of
Events and locating this event in the Calendar. The event will contain
a link to its audio webcast. The Capitol Connection provides technical
support for this free audio webcast. It will also offer access to this
event via phone bridge for a fee. If you have any questions, visit
http://ferc.capitolconnection.org/ or contact Shirley Al-Jarani at 703-
993-3104.

     Issued: December 9, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-27156 Filed 12-13-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on December 23, 2003

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKETS OST-2003-16315 & 16314

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Applicant(s):  Air-India Limited & Asiana Airlines, Inc.		Date(s) Filed:
 October 10, 2003, as amended, and December 12 (Air-India) and December
15, 2003 (Asiana).

Relief requested:

Air-India Limited (OST-2003-16315)—Extend exemption authority to
engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and
mail between points in India, on the one hand, and San Francisco, Los
Angeles, and Seattle, via Seoul, Korea (without Seoul-U.S. traffic
rights), on the other hand, pursuant to a code-share agreement with
Asiana Airlines, Inc. (Asiana), through March 27, 2004.

Asiana (OST-2003-16314)—Extend statement of authorization to display
Air-India’s designator code (“AI”) on flights operated by Asiana
Airlines between Seoul, Korea, on the one hand, and Los Angeles, San
Francisco, and Seattle, on the other hand, for an indefinite period.

Date and citation of last action:  New authority (our action here
extends authority previously authorized on

November 6, 2003, in the referenced dockets).

Applicant representative:  Marshall S. Sinick--(202) 626-6600
(Air-India)

			     Gregory S. Walden--(202) 457-6135 (Asiana)

DOT Analyst:  Gordon H. Bingham<PHONE_NUMBER>

Responsive pleadings:  Air-India states that on November 25, 2003,
India’s DGAC extended United’s authority to code-share with Asiana
until March 27, 2004.  Air-India further states that United authorized
Air-India to represent that United would not object to an extension of
Air India’s exemption authority until March 27, 2004 (commensurate
with United’s authority to code-share with Asiana).

	DISPOSITION

Action:  Approved In Part/Deferred In Part						Action date:  December
23, 2003

(We acted on these applications without awaiting expiration of the
prescribed answer period with the consent of all parties served with
both requests)

Effective dates of the exemption authority granted Air-India---December
23, 2003-March 27, 2004

Effective dates of the statement of authorization granted
Asiana—December 23, 2003-March 27, 2004

Basis for approval (bilateral agreement/reciprocity):  1995 Memorandum
of Consultations between the United States and India (1995 MOC) and
U.S.-Korea Air Transport Agreement.

2

Except to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to the
terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

X  Air-India’s Foreign Air Carrier permit (Order 95-4-36), the 1995
MOC, and standard exemption conditions (attached)

X  Asiana Foreign Air Carrier permit (Order 2000-11-10) and standard
exemption conditions (attached)

The code-share operations authorized here are subject to the following
conditions:

(a)  The statement of authorization will remain in effect only as long
as (i) Asiana and Air-India continue to hold the necessary underlying
authority to operate the code-share services at issue, and (ii) the
code-share agreement providing for the code-share operations remains in
effect.

(b)  Asiana and/or Air-India must promptly notify the Department if the
code-share agreement providing for the code-share operations is no
longer effective or the carriers decide to cease operating any or all of
the approved code-share services.  Such notices should be filed in
Dockets OST-2003-16314 and 16315.

(c)  The code-sharing operations conducted under this authority must
comply with 14 CFR Part 257 and with any amendments to the
Department’s regulations concerning code-share arrangements that may
be adopted.  Notwithstanding any provisions in the contract between the
carriers, our approval here is expressly conditioned upon the
requirements that the subject foreign air transportation be sold in the
name of the carrier holding out such service in computer reservation
systems and elsewhere; that the carrier selling such transportation
(i.e., the carrier shown on the ticket) accept responsibility for the
entirety of the code-share journey for all obligations established in
its contract of carriage with the passenger; and that the passenger
liability of the operating carrier be unaffected

(d)  The authority granted here is specifically conditioned so that
neither carrier shall give any force or effect to any contractual
provisions between themselves that are contrary to these conditions.

(e)  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority granted at any time
without hearing at our discretion.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		      Office of International Aviation

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) the applicant was qualified to perform the
proposed operations; (2) immediate action was required and was
consistent with Department policy; (3) grant of the authority was
consistent with the public interest; and (4) grant of the authority
would not constitute a major regulatory action under the Energy Policy
and Conservation Act of 1975.  To the extent not
granted/deferred/dismissed, we denied all requests in the referenced
Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority granted in this
Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR §
385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date of
issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and the
filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp"
http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

											Attachment

Foreign Carrier Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the foreign carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Not conduct any operations unless it holds a currently effective
authorization from its homeland for such operations, and it has filed a
copy of such authorization with the Department;

(2)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration, including, but not limited to, 14 CFR Parts 129, 91, and
36, and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning
security.  To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government
requirements concerning security, the holder shall, before commencing
any new service (including charter flights) from a foreign airport that
would be the holder’s last point of departure for the United States,
contact its Principal Security Inspector (PSI) to advise the PSI of its
plans and to find out whether the Transportation Security Administration
has determined that security is adequate to allow such airport(s) to be
served;

(3)  Comply with the requirements for minimum insurance coverage
contained in 14 CFR Part 205, and, prior to the commencement of any
operations under this authority, file evidence of such coverage, in the
form of a completed OST Form 6411, with the Federal Aviation
Administration’s Program Management Branch (AFS-260), Flight Standards
Service (any changes to, or termination of, insurance also shall be
filed with that office);

(4)  Not operate aircraft under this authority unless it complies with
operational safety requirements at least equivalent to Annex 6 of the
Chicago Convention;

(5)  Conform to the airworthiness and airman competency requirements of
its Government for international air services;

(6)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 203,
concerning waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(7)  Agree that operations under this authority constitute a waiver of
sovereign immunity, for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1605(a), but only with
respect to those actions or proceedings instituted against it in any
court or other tribunal in the United States that are: (a)  based on its
operations in international air transportation that, according to the
contract of carriage, include a point in the United States as a point of
origin, point of destination, or agreed stopping place, or for which the
contract of carriage was purchased in the United States; or (b)  based
on a claim under any international agreement or treaty cognizable in any
court or other tribunal of the United States.  In this condition, the
term "international air transportation" means "international
transportation" as defined by the Warsaw Convention, except that all
States shall be considered to be High Contracting Parties for the
purpose of this definition;

(8)  Except as specifically authorized by the Department, originate or
terminate all flights to/from the United States in its homeland;

(9)  Comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 217, concerning the
reporting of scheduled, nonscheduled, and charter data;

(10) If charter operations are authorized, except as otherwise provided
in the applicable aviation agreement, comply with the Department's rules
governing charters (including 14 CFR Parts 212 and 380); and

(11) Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department, with all applicable orders or regulations of other U.S.
agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the United States.

This authority shall not be effective during any period when the holder
is not in compliance with the conditions imposed above.  Moreover, this
authority cannot be sold or otherwise transferred without explicit
Department approval under Title 49 of the U.S. Code.

  In its original application filed on October 10, Air-India asked that
we grant its request for a period of at least one year.

  On November 6, 2003, we approved in part and deferred in part, action
on the requests of Air-India and Asiana to conduct the above described
services beyond December 31, 2003, pending the outcome of efforts by
United Air Lines, Inc. (United) with the Government of India to extend
its authority to codeshare with Asiana between the United States and
India, via Seoul, beyond December 31.

  Asiana confirmed that on the same date India’s DGAC extended
Asiana’s Seoul-Delhi operations through the winter season (March 27,
2004).

  We defer action on Air-India’s request for an exemption and
Asiana’s request for a statement of authorization beyond March 27,
2004.

  We expect this notification to be received within 10 days of such
non-effectiveness or of such decision.


[Federal Register: June 6, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 110)]
[Notices]
[Page 32322]
[DOCID:fr06jn08-67]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER08-797-000; ER08-797-001]

HEEP Fund, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 30, 2008.
    HEEP Fund, Inc. (HEEP Fund) filed an application for market-based
rate authority, with an accompanying tariff. The proposed market-based
rate tariff provides for the sale of energy, capacity and ancillary
services at market-based rates. HEEP Fund also requested waivers of
various Commission regulations. In particular, HEEP Fund requested that
the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by HEEP
Fund.
    On May 30, 2008, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director,
Division of Tariffs and Market Development-West, granted the requests
for blanket approval under Part 34 (Director's Order). The Director's
Order also stated that the Commission would publish a separate notice
in the Federal Register establishing a period of time for the filing of
protests. Accordingly, any person desiring to be heard concerning the
blanket approvals of issuances of securities or assumptions of
liability by HEEP Fund, should file a protest with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure. 18 CFR 385.211, 385.214 (2004). The Commission
encourages the electronic submission of protests using the FERC Online
link at http://www.ferc.gov.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests is
June 30, 2008.
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition to such blanket
approvals by the deadline above, HEEP Fund is authorized to issue
securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a guarantor,
indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of another
person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some lawful
object within the corporate purposes of HEEP Fund, compatible with the
public interest, and is reasonably necessary or appropriate for such
purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by
continued approvals of HEEP Fund's issuance of securities or
assumptions of liability.
    Copies of the full text of the Director's Order are available from
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary link. Enter the
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
filed to access the document. Comments, protests, and interventions may
be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.

Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-12661 Filed 6-5-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: March 3, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 40)]
[Notices]
[Page 9258]
[DOCID:fr03mr09-76]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1822-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]

Missouri; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Missouri (FEMA-1822-DR), dated February 17, 2009, and
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 24, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Missouri is hereby amended to include the following
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration
of February 17, 2009.

    Barry County for Public Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.).

Nancy Ward,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-4504 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P