[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 171 (Thursday, September 4, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52559-52561]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20986]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 147

[Docket Number USCG-2013-0874]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zones, Facilities on the Outer Continental Shelf in the
Gulf of Mexico

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing safety zones around four
Chevron North America (Chevron) facilities located on the Outer
Continental Shelf (OCS) in the Gulf of Mexico. The facilities are
listed in the Supplementary Information.The purpose of these safety
zones is to protect each facility from vessels operating outside the
normal shipping channels and fairways. Placing a safety zone around
each facility will significantly reduce the threat of allisions, oil
spills, and releases of natural gas, and thereby protect the safety of
life, property, and the environment.

DATES: This rule is effective October 6, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2013-0874. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Rusty Wright, U.S. Coast Guard, District Eight
Waterways Management Branch; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on the docket, call
Cheryl F. Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
OCS Outer Continental Shelf
USCG United States Coast Guard

A. Regulatory History and Information

    On April 9, 2014 we published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) with a request for comments entitled, ``Safety Zones, Facilities
on the Outer Continental Shelf in the Gulf of Mexico'' in the Federal
Register (79 FR 19569). We received no comments on the NPRM.

B. Basis and Purpose

    Under the authority provided in 14 U.S.C. 85, 43 U.S.C. 1333, and
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, Title 33, CFR
Part 147 permits the establishment of safety zones for facilities
located on the OCS for the purpose of protecting life, property and the
marine environment. Chevron requested that the Coast Guard establish
safety zones around four of its facilities located in the deepwater
area of the Gulf of Mexico on the OCS. Placing a safety zone around
each of these four facilities significantly reduces the threat of
allisions, oil spills, and releases of natural gas, and thereby
protects the safety of life, property, and the environment. The
facilities are as follows:
    (1) The Jack St. Malo Semi-Sub Facility located in Walker Ridge
Block 718;
    (2) The Petronius Compliant Tower Facility located in Viosca Knoll
Block 786;
    (3) The Blind Faith Semi-Sub Facility located in Mississippi Canyon
Block 650; and
    (4) The Tahiti SPAR Facility located in Green Canyon Block 641.
    For the purpose of safety zones established under 33 CFR part 147,
the deepwater area is considered to be waters of 304.8 meters (1,000
feet) or greater depth extending to the limits of the Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ) contiguous to the territorial sea of the United
States and extending to a distance up to 200 nautical miles from the
baseline from which the breadth of the sea is measured. Navigation in
the vicinity of each safety zone consists of large commercial shipping
vessels, fishing vessels, cruise ships, tugs with tows and the
occasional recreational vessel. The deepwater area also includes an
extensive system of fairways.

C. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule

    We received no comments in response to the proposed rule. There is
one technical amendment to the final rule regarding the name of one of
the facilities. In the NPRM, the first listed facility requesting a
safety zone was listed as ``The Jack & St Malo Semi-Sub Facility.'' The
Coast Guard was notified by Chevron that the facility name should be
``The Jack St. Malo.'' In this final rule the Coast Guard has corrected
the name throughout the rulemaking and regulatory text. Otherwise, this
rule is publishing as proposed without change.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. This rule is not a
significant regulatory action due to the location of the safety zones
on the OCS and the distance between each facility and both land and
safety fairways. Vessel traffic can pass safely around each safety zone
using alternate routes. Exceptions to this rule include vessels
measuring less than 100 feet in length overall and not engaged in
towing. Deviation to transit through each safety zone may be requested.
Such requests will be considered on a case-by-case basis and may be
authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District or a
designated representative.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received zero comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in; Walker Ridge Block 718; Viosca Knoll Block 786;
Mississippi Canyon Block 650; and Green Canyon Block 641, where these
safety zones are now established.
    These safety zones will not have a significant economic impact or a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: Vessel
traffic can pass safely around each safety zone using alternate routes.
Use of alternate routes may cause minimal delay in reaching a final
destination, depending on other traffic in the area and vessel speed.
Additionally, exceptions to this rule include vessels measuring less
than 100 feet in length overall and not engaged in towing. Also,
vessels may request deviation from this rule to transit through each
safety zone. Such requests will be considered on a case-by-case basis
and may be authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District or
a designated representative. Therefore, the Coast Guard expects any
impact of this rulemaking establishing safety zones around OCS
facilities to be minimal, with no significant economic impact on small
entities.

3. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

4. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

5. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

7. Taking of Private Property

    This rule would not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

8. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

9. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

10. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

11. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

12. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

13. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This rule involves the establishment
of safety zones around OCS Facilities to protect life, property and the
marine environment. This rule is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant
Instruction. The environmental analysis checklists supporting this
determination and Categorical Exclusion Determinations

are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 147

    Continental shelf, Marine safety, Navigation (water).

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 147 as follows:

PART 147--SAFETY ZONES

0
1. The authority citation for part 147 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 14 U.S.C. 85; 43 U.S.C. 1333; and Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  147.851, Sec.  147.853, Sec.  147.855, and Sec.  147.857
to read as follows:

Sec.  147.851  Jack St. Malo Semi-Sub Facility Safety Zone.

    (a) Description. The Jack St. Malo Semi-Sub facility is in the
deepwater area of the Gulf of Mexico at Walker Ridge block 718. The
facility is located at 26[deg]14'5.94'' N, 91[deg]15'39.99'' W and the
area within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from each point on the facility
structure's outer edge is a safety zone.
    (b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone
except the following:
    (1) An attending vessel;
    (2) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in
towing; or
    (3) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District or a designated representative.

Sec.  147.853  Petronius Compliant Tower Facility Safety Zone.

    (a) Description. The Petronius Compliant Tower facility is in the
deepwater area of the Gulf of Mexico at Viosca Knoll Block 786. The
facility is located at 28[deg]13'44'' N/-87[deg]47'51'' W and the area
within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from each point on the facility
structure's outer edge is a safety zone.
    (b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone
except the following:
    (1) An attending vessel;
    (2) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in
towing; or
    (3) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District or a designated representative.

Sec.  147.855  Blind Faith Semi-Sub Facility Safety Zone.

    (a) Description. The Blind Faith Semi-Sub facility is in the
deepwater area of the Gulf of Mexico at Mississippi Canyon Block 650.
The facility is located at 28[deg]20'29.5279'' N/-88[deg]15'56.4728'' W
and the area within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from each point on the
facility structure's outer edge is a safety zone.
    (b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone
except the following:
    (1) An attending vessel;
    (2) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in
towing; or
    (3) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District or a designated representative.

Sec.  147.857  Tahiti SPAR Facility Safety Zone.

    (a) Description. The Tahiti SPAR facility is in the deepwater area
of the Gulf of Mexico at Tahiti SPAR. The facility is located at
27[deg]19'33.3'' N/-90[deg]42'50.9'' W and the area within 500 meters
(1640.4 feet) from each point on the facility structure's outer edge is
a safety zone.
    (b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone
except the following:
    (1) An attending vessel;
    (2) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in
towing; or
    (3) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District or a designated representative.

    Dated: August 6, 2014.
Kevin S. Cook,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014-20986 Filed 9-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


Record of Consultations Between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
and

Respondents to the Information Collection Request:

“Pesticide Registration Fee Waivers”

(Consultations conducted in June, 2006)

Jim Kunstman;  PBI/Gordon

Jim Messina;  Exponent, Agent for SePro and Ajay North America

Terry Pizzarello;  Falcon Labs

Judith Thompson;  Hacco Inc.

Company Name: PBI/Gordon

Name of person consulted: Jim Kunstman

Date: 6/2006

Q: When preparing your waiver request did you consult the Questions and
Answers on the EPA website?

A: Yes, though less often as a result of experience

Q: If yes, did you find it helpful and informative?

A: Yes

Q: What improvements or clarifications would you like to see?

A:  No suggestions at this time.

Q: Are you aware of the industry generated form?

A: Yes.  Assisted in generating it.

Q: Would you use the industry generated form?   If no, why not?

Uses the industry generated form on the web.

Labor Rates:

Q: Would you say the following labor rates are accurate?

$130/hr management; $88/hr technical staff; $40/hr clerical –
estimates for management and technical staff are reasonable.  The
estimate for clericals in the company’s regulatory staff when
considering benefits may be low and $50/hr may be more accurate.

•The agency methodology for estimating the cost and burden associated
with the paperwork involved with preparing your waiver request is the
following

Management: reading and comprehending the regulations, planning
activities to submit the waiver request: 10 hrs; Subsequent submissions:
2 hrs

The first submission during a maintenance fee billing cycle probably
requires 12 hours of management time to gather documents and
information.  Subsequent submissions during a maintenance fee cycle do
not require management time.  The company has an electronic system to
generate pesticide sales information.  The first application in the 2006
cycle was complex due to additional financial information to support
average global pesticide sales of less than $60 million.

Technical:  locating and preparing copies of taxes, audits, payroll
account statements, any market analysis, etc.?  40 hrs; Subsequent
submissions 40 hrs

Subsequent submissions in a maintenance fee cycle take 1 hour to prepare
because of the company’s automated systems.

Clerical: preparing the submission 10 hrs; Subsequent submissions 10hrs

Clerical assistance is not used because financial and personnel
information are kept at the management level.

Q: Did we miss anything?

Comments:

Mr. Kunstman asked about the electronic notification of fee payment.
His observation was that after the move, the Agency’s system was not
notifying registrants of payments.

Mr. Kunstman also observed that fee waivers were being processed in less
time than previously.

Company Name: Exponent, Agent for SePro and Ajay North America

Name of person consulted: Jim Messina

Date: 6/2006

Q: When preparing your waiver request did you consult the Questions and
Answers on the EPA website?

A: Yes

Q: If yes, did you find it helpful and informative?

A: Yes

Q: What improvements or clarifications would you like to see?

A:  The overheads from a  presentation on fee waivers during a 2004 PRIA
workshop are hard to find.  It defined the criteria for a 50% and 100%
waiver.

Q: Are you aware of the industry generated form?

A:   Yes

Q: Would you use the industry generated form?   If no, why not?

Uses own with the same information and on company letterhead.

Labor Rates:

Q: Would you say the following labor rates are accurate?

$130/hr management; $88/hr technical staff; $40/hr clerical

As a consulting firm, charges are $175/hr management, $100/hr technical,
and considering the level of clerical expertise, $65/hr clerical.

•The agency methodology for estimating the cost and burden associated
with the paperwork involved with preparing your waiver request is the
following :

Management: reading and comprehending the regulations, planning
activities to submit the waiver request: 10 hrs; Subsequent submissions:
5 hrs

Technical:  locating and preparing copies of taxes, audits, payroll
account statements, any market analysis, etc.:  40 hrs; Subsequent
submissions 40 hrs

Clerical: preparing the submission 10 hrs; Subsequent submissions 10hrs

The first application took the most time.  Most of the hours were at the
technical level.  Management spends about 2 to 3 hours in directing and
reviewing the work on the first fee waiver submission.  The remainder of
the work is generally performed by technical staff.  Since a portion of
the work is conducted by the client company, the amount of clerical time
varies substantially and consequently difficult to estimate.  Between
Mr. Messina’s consulting firm and the client company, approximately 4
hours were spent on reading regulations and obtaining the tax
information, 1 to 4 hours copying the information and putting together
the submission, 1 to 4 hours by the client filing the information, and
1-6 hours to respond to any questions from the Agency.

Subsequent applications in the same year took less time, as the
information was copied.  At most 5 to 6 hours.  The first fee waiver in
a maintenance fee billing cycle takes about as much time as the first
fee waiver submission.

Q: Did we miss anything?

Comments:

Clients from smaller companies required more time to obtain information
because they may have neither filing systems nor support staff.

Company Name: Falcon Labs

Name of person consulted: Terry Pizzarello

Date: 6/16/2006

Q: When preparing your waiver request did you consult the Questions and
Answers on the EPA website?

A: Yes

Q: If yes, did you find it helpful and informative?

A: Yes

Q: What improvements or clarifications would you like to see?

Q: Are you aware of the industry generated form?

A: Yes.

Q: Would you use the industry generated form?   If no, why not?

A;  Yes

Labor Rates:

Q: Would you say the following labor rates are accurate?

$130/hr management; $88/hr technical staff; $40/hr clerical

Company is a small family operated company with no clerical staff.
First pesticide application.

Management: reading and comprehending the regulations, planning
activities to submit the waiver request: 10 hrs; Subsequent submissions:
2 hrs

Most of the work was done by the company Vice-President, Ms. Pizzarello.
 She spent about 20 minutes reading the material on the web site.  Spent
about 1 hour with a pesticide consultant at $150/hr who answered those
questions that could not be answered from the web site.  Her accountant
spent about an hour collecting the financial information.  She estimates
that she spent a total of five hours on preparing and mailing the
application.

Technical:  locating and preparing copies of taxes, audits, payroll
account statements, any market analysis, etc.?  40 hrs; Subsequent
submissions 40 hrs

All work was performed by management.

Clerical: preparing the submission 10 hrs; Subsequent submissions 10hrs

Company used no clerical support.

Q: Did we miss anything?

Comments:

It was a simple process for the company.

Company Name: Hacco Inc.

Name of person consulted: Judith Thompson

Date: 6/16/2006

Q: When preparing your waiver request did you consult the Questions and
Answers on the EPA website?

A:  Obtained information on the process from another company.   Company
submitted their only fee waiver application in 2005.

Q: If yes, did you find it helpful and informative?

A:  Since the Ms. Thompson was not familiar with the process, the fee
waiver application was submitted in response to the Agency’s bill or
fee invoice.

Q: What improvements or clarifications would you like to see?

A:  Ms. Thompson would like to be able to find information on fee
categories or action codes and what needs to be submitted for a small
business easily on the web.  She had to pull the information from
different web locations.

Q: Are you aware of the industry generated form?

A: Yes.  Used some of it and submitted a certification from their Chief
Financial Officer.

Q: Would you use the industry generated form?   If no, why not?

	Addressed the same questions - CFO signed certification

Labor Rates:

Q: Would you say the following labor rates are accurate?

$130/hr management; $88/hr technical staff; $40/hr clerical

Salary and benefits for technical staff are closer to $65/hr.  For
clerical staff $40/hr is in the ballpark, though $30/hr would also be
reasonable.

Management: reading and comprehending the regulations, planning
activities to submit the waiver request: 10 hrs; Subsequent submissions:
2 hrs

Management took 10 to 12 hours.

Technical:  locating and preparing copies of taxes, audits, payroll
account statements, any market analysis, etc.?  40 hrs; Subsequent
submissions 40 hrs

Technical staff took 35 hours which included all clerical duties.

Clerical: preparing the submission 10 hrs; Subsequent submissions 10hrs

No clericals – the company has minimum clerical staff.

Q: Did we miss anything?

Comments:

Ms. Thompson went to the web site to find where to send  her
applications.  The web site for the interpretations of the fee
categories and guidance on small businesses were forwarded to her.


[Federal Register: December 28, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 247)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 68519-68520]
[DOCID:fr28de09-15]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0696; Airspace Docket No. 09-AGL-18]

Amendment of Class E Airspace; West Branch, MI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends Class E airspace at West Branch, MI, to
accommodate Area Navigation (RNAV) Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures (SIAPs) at West Branch Community Airport, West Branch, MI.
The FAA is taking this action to enhance the safety and management of
Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, April 8, 2010. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 1 CFR
part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Enander, Central Service Center,

Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone (817) 321-
7716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On September 3, 2009, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to amend Class E airspace for West Branch
Community Airport, West Branch, MI (74 FR 45575) Docket No. FAA-2009-
0696. Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received. Class E airspace designations are published in
paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9T signed August 27, 2009, and
effective September 15, 2009, which is incorporated by reference in 14
CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed in this document
will be published subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
Part 71 by amending Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface to accommodate SIAPs at West Branch Community
Airport, West Branch, MI. This action is necessary for the safety and
management of IFR operations at the airport.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, section 106, describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart I, section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends controlled airspace at West Branch Community Airport, West
Branch, MI.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E. O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR Part 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15,
2009, is amended as follows:
* * * * *

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface.

* * * * *

AGL MI E5 West Branch, MI [Amended]

West Branch Community Airport, MI
    (Lat. 44[deg]14'41'' N., long. 84[deg]10'47'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7-mile radius of West Branch Community Airport and within
2.7 miles each side of the 086[deg] bearing from the airport
extending from the 7-mile radius to 11.4 miles east of the airport;
and within 4 miles each side of the 269[deg] bearing from the
airport extending from the 7-mile radius to 11.5 miles west of the
airport.
* * * * *

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on December 15, 2009.
Richard Farrell,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. E9-30273 Filed 12-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 83 (Friday, April 29, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25603-25604]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09985]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2015-5802; Airspace Docket No. 15-ASW-17]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Horseshoe Bend, AR

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface at Horseshoe Bend Airport, Horseshoe Bend,
AR, to accommodate new Standard Instrument Approach Procedures for the
safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at
the airport.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, July 21, 2016. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under Title 1,
Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual revision of
FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.9Z, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed on line at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC, 20591; telephone: 202-267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.9Z at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to
http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Shelby, Central Service
Center, Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part, A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it establishes Class E airspace at Horseshoe Bend Airport, Horseshoe
Bend AR.

History

    On February 10, 2016, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to establish Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Horseshoe Bend
Airport, Horseshoe Bend, AR. (81 FR 7039). Docket No. FAA-2015-5802.
Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.9Z, dated August 6, 2015, and effective September 15,
2015, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.9Z, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2015, and effective September 15,
2015. FAA Order 7400.9Z is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.9Z lists Class A, B,
C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and reporting
points.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR),
Part 71 by establishing Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface within a 6-mile radius of Horseshoe Bend Airport,
Horseshoe Bend, AR, to accommodate new Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures for IFR operations at the airport.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures'' paragraph 5-6.5a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exists that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 71 continues to read as follows:

     Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Z,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2015, and
effective September 15, 2015, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASW AR E5 Horseshoe Bend, AR [New]

Horseshoe Bend Airport, AR
    (Lat. 36[deg]13'17'' N., long. 091[deg]45'20'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6-mile radius of Horseshoe Bend Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on April 20, 2016.
Robert W. Beck,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2016-09985 Filed 4-28-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75191-75192]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29513]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736.
Extension: Form 4;
    SEC File No. 270-126, OMB Control

No. 3235-0287.
    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved
collection of information discussed below.
    Under the Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) every person
who is directly or indirectly the beneficial owner of more than 10
percent of any class of any equity security (other than an exempted
security) which registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act (15
U.S.C. 78l), or who is a director or any officer of the issuer of such
security (collectively ``insider), must file a statement with the
Commission reporting their ownership. Form 4 is a statement to disclose
changes in an insider's ownership of securities. The information is
used for the purpose of disclosing the equity holdings of insiders of
reporting companies. Approximately 204,054 insiders file Form 4
annually and it takes approximately 0.5 hours to prepare for a total of
102,027 annual burden hours.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this
information collection at the following Web site, www.reginfo.gov .
Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Acting Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30
days of this notice.

    Dated: December 11, 2014.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29513 Filed 12-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 209 (Friday, October 28, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66886-66887]
[FR Doc No: 2011-27961]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 60 and 63

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505; FRL-9484-3]
RIN 2060-AP76

Oil and Natural Gas Sector: New Source Performance Standards and
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Reviews;
Extension of Comment Period Closing Date

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of the public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is announcing that the period for providing public
comments on the August 23, 2011 proposed rule titled, ``Oil and Natural
Gas Sector: New Source Performance Standards and National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Reviews,'' is being extended to
November 30, 2011.

DATES: Comments. The public comment period for the proposed rules
published on August 23, 2011 (76 FR 52738) closes on November 30, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OAR-2010-0505, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov:
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Agency Web site: http://www.epa.gov/oar/docket.html.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the Air and
Radiation Docket Web site.
     Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Include Docket ID Number
EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505 in the subject line of the message.
     Facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Attention Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. Please include a
total of two copies. In addition, please mail a copy of your comments
on the information collection provisions to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Attn:
Desk Officer for the EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.
     Hand Delivery: United States Environmental Protection
Agency, EPA West (Air Docket), Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20004, Attention Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-
2010-0505. The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be confidential business information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or email. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means the EPA will not know
your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body
of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to the EPA
without going through http://www.regulations.gov, your email address
will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that
is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If
you submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include
your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and
with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If the EPA cannot read your comment
due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification,
the EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files
should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and
be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about the
EPA's public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at

http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket. Publicly available documents relevant to this action are
available for public inspection either electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, or in hard copy at the EPA Docket Center, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. A reasonable fee may be charged for copying.
    World Wide Web. The EPA Web site for this rulemaking is located at:
http://www.epa.gov/airquality/oilandgas.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Bruce Moore, Fuels and
Incineration Group (E143-05), Sector Policies and Programs Division,
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711;
Telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>; Email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comment Period

    The EPA has received numerous requests for extending the public
comment period for this proposed rule. Based on the information
provided in the requests, the EPA has determined that an extension of
30 days is appropriate. Accordingly, the public comment period will now
end on November 30, 2011. Note that, on August 23, 2011, the EPA
published in the Federal Register the proposed rule titled, ``Oil and
Natural Gas Sector: New Source Performance Standards and National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Reviews.'' In that
notice, the EPA announced that all comments must be received by October
24, 2011. The EPA conducted three public hearings on this proposed
rule, the last of which was held on September 29, 2011, in Arlington,
Texas. See 76 FR 53371, August 26, 2011. Under section 307(d) of the
Clean Air Act (CAA), the EPA must keep the record open for 30 days
after completion of the hearings to provide an opportunity for
submission of rebuttal and supplementary information. On October 20,
2011, the EPA published a Federal Register notice correcting the
comment period closing date to October 31, 2011. See 76 FR 65138,
October 20, 2011.

How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    The EPA has established the official public docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2010-0505. The EPA has also developed Web sites for the proposed
rulemaking at the addresses given above.

    Dated: October 24, 2011.
Gina McCarthy,
Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2011-27961 Filed 10-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


DRAFT Page 1 of 1 4/ 29/ 2005 04 19 05 BOARD OF SCIENTIFIC COUNSELORS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DRAFT AGENDA Thursday, May 5, 2005 1: 00 p. m.   3: 00 pm Eastern CONFERENCE CALL Participation by Teleconference Only 1: 00 1: 10 p. m. Welcome and Overview Dr. James H. Johnson, Jr.  Purpose of Teleconference Call Chair, BOSC Executive Committee 1: 10   1: 15p. m. DFO Remarks Lori Kowalski, Office of Research and Development 1: 15 1: 35 p. m. Ecological Subcommittee Draft Report Dr. Michael Clegg, Chair,  Overview Ecological Subcommittee  Draft responses to charge questions 1: 35 1: 50 p. m. Discussion Dr. Clifford Duke, BOSC Executive Committee/ Dr. George Lambert, BOSC Executive Committee Liaison 1: 50 2: 00 p. m. Public Comment 2: 00   2: 45 p. m. Discussion ( Continued) Dr. Clifford Duke, BOSC Executive Committee/ Dr. George Lambert, BOSC Executive Committee Liaison 2: 45   3: 00 p. m. Final Report Dr. James H. Johnson, Jr.  Identification of Additional Changes Chair, BOSC Executive  Approval by Executive Committee Committee 3: 00 p. m. Adjourn


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 229 (Thursday, November 30, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 56851]
[FR Doc No: 2017-25839]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Change in Use of Aeronautical
Property at Laurinburg-Maxton Airport, Maxton, NC

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is requesting public
comment on a request by the Laurinburg-Maxton Airport Commission, on
behalf of the airport Sponsor (the City of Laurinburg and the Town of
Maxton), to change a portion of airport property from aeronautical to
non-aeronautical use at the Laurinburg-Maxton Airport. The request
consists of release of approximately 29.10 acres to Scotland County
Economic Development Corporation (SCEDC) to be used for future economic
development.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 2, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this notice may be mailed or delivered in
triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Memphis Airports
District Office, Attn: Koty Brown, Program Manager, 2600 Thousand Oaks
Boulevard, Suite 2250, Memphis, TN 38118.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be
mailed or delivered to Ms. Joanne Gentry, Executive Director for
Laurinburg-Maxton Airport Commission at the following address: 16701
Airport Road, Maxton, NC 28364.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Koty Brown, Program Manager, Federal
Aviation Administration, Memphis Airports District Office, 2600
Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Suite 2250, Memphis, TN 38118-2482. The
application may be reviewed in person at this same location, by
appointment.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public
comment on the request to release property for non-aeronautical
purposes at Laurinburg-Maxton Airport, Maxton, NC under the provisions
of 49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(2). The FAA determined that the request to
release property at Laurinburg-Maxton Airport (MEB) submitted by the
Laurinburg-Maxton Airport Commission on behalf of the City of
Laurinburg and the Town of Maxton meets the procedural requirements of
the FAA and the release of the property does not and will not impact
future aviation needs at the airport. The FAA may approve the request,
in whole or in part, no sooner than thirty days after the publication
of this notice.
    The following is a brief overview of the request:
    The Laurinburg-Maxton Airport Commission on behalf of the City of
Laurinburg and the Town of Maxton is proposing the release of
approximately 29.10 acres to Scotland County Economic Development
Corporation (SCEDC) to be used for future economic development. This
property is located along Airport Road and U.S. 74 Bypass in Scotland
County, NC. The property is separated from the majority of airport
property by other parcels of land owned by others. The proposed use of
this property is compatible with airport operations.
    Any person may inspect, by appointment, the request in person at
the FAA office listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Memphis, TN, on November 17, 2017.
Phillip Braden,
Manager, Memphis Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2017-25839 Filed 11-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P


Meeting materials submitted by the Center for Progressive Reform during a non-government stakeholder listening session with the OMB and various EOP offices held on 06/16/2022 for the Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Program Under the Clean Air Act; Safer Communities by Chemical Accident Prevention. A Proposed Rule.

Attachment 1.	CPR-General-Memo-on-CBA-Final
Attachment 2.	cpr-response-epa-re-cba-for-rmp-071521
Attachment 3. Sinden Unquantified Benefits


[Federal Register: November 19, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 224)]
[Notices]
[Page 69635-69637]
[DOCID:fr19no08-81]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0561; FRL-8389-6]

Notice of Filing of a Pesticide Petition for Residues of
Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various Commodities

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the initial filing of a pesticide
petition proposing the establishment or modification of regulations for
residues of acetic acid in or on various commodities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 19, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0561 and the pesticide petition number PP
8F7319, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW. Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2008-0561. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you

consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available in regulations.gov. To access the electronic docket, go to
http://www.regulations.gov, select ``Advanced Search,'' then ``Docket
Search.'' Insert the docket ID number where indicated and select the
``Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on the regulations.gov
website to view the docket index or access available documents.
Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket at http://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of operation of this
Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703)
305-5805.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl Greene, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703 ) 308-0352; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    EPA is printing a notice of the filing of a pesticide petition
received under section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a, proposing the establishment or modification of
regulations in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of acetic acid in or on
various food commodities. EPA has determined that the pesticide
petition described in this notice contains data or information
regarding the elements set forth in FFDCA section 408(d) (2); however,
EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at
this time or whether the data supports granting of the pesticide
petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on this
pesticide petition.
    Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a summary of the petition included in
this notice, prepared by the petitioner, is included in a docket EPA
has created for this rulemaking. The docket for this petition is
available on-line at http://www.regulations.gov.

Amendment to an Existing Tolerance Exemption

    PP 8F7319. EPA has received a pesticide petition 8F7319, from
Summerset Products, 130 Columbia Court, Chaska, MN 55318, proposing to
amend the existing tolerance exemption in 40 CFR 180.1258, for residues
of the biochemical acetic acid when used as an herbicide applied to
commercial and residential crops. Because this petition is a request
for an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance without numerical
limitations, no analytical method is required.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives,
Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    Dated: October 31, 2008.
Janet L. Andersen,
Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E8-27486 Filed 11-18-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 161 (Monday, August 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51477-51482]
[FR Doc No: 2022-17945]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. OST-2021-0050]

Privacy Act of 1974; Department of Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration; DOT/FAA 807 Facility Access Control at the
Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center

AGENCY: Office of the Departmental Chief Information Officer, Office of
the Secretary of Transportation, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of a modified Privacy Act system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, the United States
Department of Transportation (DOT), Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA), proposes to rename, update and reissue an existing system of
records notice currently titled ``Department of Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration, DOT/FAA 807, Traffic Control at the Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center.'' The Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center
(MMAC) is located in Oklahoma City, OK and is home to more than 8,000
full[hyphen]time employees and receives 10,000 visitors

per month. It encompasses approximately 1,100 acres and 133 buildings
and conducts training for DOT/FAA employees and contractors, and other
federal employees (including employees of federal agencies who are
tenants at the MMAC). Tenants are federal agencies who pay to lease
space on the MMAC campus. The Director for the Office of Facilities and
Management (AMP-1), the Security and Investigations Division (AMC-700)
and the MMAC Operations and Maintenance Division (AMP-300), are
responsible for maintaining access control to the facility including
the administration of policies, programs and activities related to
access to the MMAC facilities, as well as managing tasks related to
vehicle registrations, key issuance, visitors (members of the public,
including federal employees attending training or special events,
short-term vendors, and research participants), as well as tenants and
DOT/FAA employees and contractors assigned to the MMAC campus. These
functions ensure that only authorized personnel obtain access and
entrance to facilities located at the MMAC campus and that pedestrian
and vehicular traffic within the campus is controlled and orderly.

Notice Updates

    This Notice includes both substantive changes and non-substantive
changes to the previously published Notice. The substantive changes
have been made to the system name, system manager, authority, purpose,
categories of individuals, categories of records, record source
categories, routine uses, policies and practices for storage of
records, policies and practices for retrieval of records, policies and
practices for retention and disposal of records, and record access
procedures. The non-substantive changes have been made to
administrative, technical and physical safeguards, contesting records
procedures, and notification procedures, as well as revisions to align
with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Memoranda A-108 and ensure consistency with other Notices issued by the
Department of Transportation.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted on or before September 21,
2022. The Department may publish an amended Systems of Records Notice
in light of any comments received. This new system will be effective
September 21, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number DOT-
OST-2021-0050 by any of the following methods:
     Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday
through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Instructions: You must include the agency name and docket
number DOT-OST-2021-0050. All comments received will be posted without
change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received in any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the
Department of Transportation's complete Privacy Act statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
may visit http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov or to the street
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
docket.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions, please contact: Karyn
Gorman, Acting Departmental Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office,
Department of Transportation, Washington, DC 20590; [email protected]; or
202-527-3284.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, the Department of
Transportation proposes to modify and re-issue a Department of
Transportation system of record notice titled, ``Department of
Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, DOT/FAA 807 Traffic
Control at the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center (formerly named Law
Enforcement Records and Central Files).'' This system of records covers
records collected and maintained for the purposes of:
     Issuing permanent and temporary parking passes (or decals)
to DOT/FAA employees and contractors, and tenants;
     Issuing short[hyphen]term passes to federal employees and
contractors who have forgotten or misplaced their Personal
Identification Verification (PIV) card;
     Issuing short-term and long-term passes to visitors;
     Issuing keys (both physical and digital) to federal
employees and contractors; and
     Maintaining records of individuals failing to adhere to
parking policy and, therefore, cited for parking violations on the MMAC
campus.
    The following substantive changes have been made to the Notice:
    1. System Name and Number: This Notice updates the system name to
``Facility Access Control at the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center''
from the previous system name of ``Traffic Control at the Mike Monroney
Aeronautical Center (formerly named Law Enforcement Records and Central
Files).'' The update to the system name accounts for the access control
conducted by the MMAC, such as visitor passes, parking decals and key
access management.
    2. System Manager: This Notice updates the system manager to
include contact information for the Office of Facility Management which
was not included in the previous Notice. The system manager contact
information is compatible with the purpose of the system of records.
    3. Authority: This Notice updates the authorities to include
Chapter 5 of Title 40, United States Code, Property Management, and 41
CFR part 102-74, Facility Management which authorize the administration
of programs and systems as well as collection of records to manage to
property, and vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Reference to 44 U.S.C.
3101 authorizing the collection and use of agency documents and
information related to agency policies, procedures and transactions is
not appropriate for activity around the collection of information
related to facility access management and has been removed.
    4. Purpose: This Notice updates the purpose to incorporate all
functions of the MMAC. This includes issuance of short- and long-term
passes and parking decals, issuance of keys, and maintenance of
individuals who violate parking policy. The records collected, used and
maintained are compatible with the purpose of the system of records.
    5. Categories of Individuals: Consistent with the expansion of the
purpose of the system, this Notice expands the categories of
individuals to include those individuals (employees, contractors,
visitors, and tenants) who apply for temporary or long-term passes and
parking decals authorizing them to enter the MMAC campus. Additionally,
the language in this section has been

clarified to define tenants as individuals to whom the FAA issues
parking passes and may cite for parking violations. The categories of
individuals is compatible with the purpose of the system of records.
    6. Categories of Records: This Notice updates categories of records
to reflect that the system collects information for the purposes of
issuing visitor passes, and parking decals. Visitor pass records
include the following data elements, not limited to: full name and
signature, temporary badge number, identity (ID) card number (including
driver's license number), and phone number. Records collected and
maintained for parking (including parking violations) include: full
name, handicap (HC) placard number, decal number, tag number and state,
vehicle description, vehicle year and make, and comments (including
driver's license number). Records collected and maintained for key
issuance and management include; key holder name, email address and
signature, request ID, and key ID assigned. The categories of records
is compatible with the purpose of the system of records.
    7. Records Source: This Notice updates records source to reference
that information collected and maintained is provided by individuals
seeking parking decals and access to MMAC facilities. Items, such as
temporary badge number, decal number and HC placard number, are
provided by FAA employees and contractors approving these access and
parking requests.
    8. Routine Uses: This Notice updates routine uses to include the
Department of Transportation's general routine uses applicable to this
Notice as they were previously only incorporated by reference. OMB
Memoranda A-108 recommends that agencies include all routine uses in
one notice rather than incorporating general routine uses by reference;
therefore, the Department is replacing the statement in DOT/FAA 807
that referenced the ``Statement of General Routine Uses'' with all of
the general routine uses that apply to this system of records. This
update does not substantially affect any of the routine uses for
records maintained in this system.
    9. Records Storage: This Notice updates policies and practices for
the storage of records to reflect that current records are electronic.
The previously published Notice stated that records are maintained in
files and containers, and in password protected electronic databases in
rooms secured with the FAA locking system.
    10. Records Retrieval: This Notice updates the policies and
practices for the retrieval of records to reflect that parking records
(including parking violations) can be searched by name, temporary badge
number, vehicle tag number or vehicle decal number. Visitor pass
records can be retrieved by name. Key access management records may be
retrieved by name as well as request ID and key ID. The records
retrieval information is compatible with the purpose of the system of
records.
    11. Retention and Disposal: This Notice updates the policies and
practices for retention and disposal of records section to include
current National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) schedules
governing the various record types. The updated retention schedules
include the following groupings of record types: (a) Visitor pass and
parking information (including parking violations) are covered by
General Records Schedule (GRS) 5.6 Item 111 Visitor Processing Records
where records are destroyed when 2 years old. The schedule includes
retention for visitor passes in addition to parking; and (b) Key access
management information is covered by GRS 5.6 Item 020 Key and Card
Access Accountability where records are destroyed when 3 years old. The
previously published Notice stated the following: Identification
credentials including parking permits: Destroy credentials three months
after return to issuing office. Related identification credential
papers such as vehicle registrations: Destroy after all listed
credentials are accounted for. Reports, statements of witnesses,
warning notices, and other papers relating to arrests and traffic
violations: Destroy when 2 years old. Records related to witness
statements were included incorrectly and are no longer included in the
updated Notice.
    12. Record Access: This Notice updates the record access procedures
to reflect that signatures on signed requests for records must either
be notarized or accompanied by a statement made under penalty of
perjury in compliance with 28 U.S.C. 1746 while the previous Notice
directed the Record Access, Contesting Record and Notification sections
to ``System Manager.''
    The following non-substantive changes to the administrative,
technical, and physical safeguards, contesting records procedures, and
notification procedures, have been made to improve the transparency and
readability of the Notice:
    13. Administrative, Technical and Physical Safeguards: This Notice
updates the administrative, technical and physical safeguards to
reference current FAA processes. The purpose of this non-substantive
update is to clarify language around security controls to restrict
access to authorized users, thereby aligning with the requirements of
OMB Memoranda A-108 and for consistency with other DOT/FAA SORNs.
    14. Contesting Records: This Notice updates the procedures for
contesting records to refer the reader to the record access procedures
section. The purpose of this non-substantive update is to align with
the requirements of OMB Memoranda A-108 and for consistency with other
DOT/FAA SORNs.
    15. Notification: This Notice updates the procedures for
notification to refer the reader to the record access procedures
section. The purpose of this non-substantive update is to align with
the requirements of OMB Memoranda A-108 and for consistency with other
DOT/FAA SORNs.

II. Privacy Act

    The Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) governs the means by which the
Federal Government collects, maintains, and uses personally
identifiable information (PII) in a System of Records. A ``System of
Records'' is a group of any records under the control of a Federal
agency from which information about individuals is retrieved by name or
other personal identifier. The Privacy Act requires each agency to
publish in the Federal Register a System of Records Notice (SORN)
identifying and describing each System of Records the agency maintains,
including the purposes for which the agency uses PII in the system, the
routine uses for which the agency discloses such information outside
the agency, and how individuals to whom a Privacy Act record pertains
can exercise their rights under the Privacy Act (e.g., to determine if
the system contains information about them and to contest inaccurate
information). In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(r), DOT has provided a
report of this system of records to the Office of Management and Budget
and to Congress.
SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER:
    Department of Transportation (DOT)/Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) 807 Facility Access Control at the Mike Monroney Aeronautical
Center.

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION:
    Unclassified, sensitive.

SYSTEM LOCATION:
    Federal Aviation Administration, Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center
(MMAC), 6500 S MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169.

SYSTEM MANAGER:
    Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Facility Management,
AMP-1, Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 S MacArthur Blvd.,
Oklahoma City, OK 73169. Contact information for the system manager is:
405-954-4572.

AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:
    40 U.S.C. Chapter 5, and 41 CFR part 102-74, Facility Management.

PURPOSE(S) OF THE SYSTEM:
    The purpose of this system includes issuance of short- and long-
term passes and parking decals, issuance of keys, and maintenance of
records on individuals who violate parking policy.

CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE SYSTEM:
    Records include information on DOT/FAA employees and contractors,
visitors, and tenants.

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
    Visitor pass records include the following data elements, not
limited to: full name and signature, temporary badge number, ID card
number (including driver's license number), and phone number. Records
collected and maintained for parking (including parking violations)
include: full name, HC placard number, decal number, tag number and
state, vehicle description, vehicle year and make, and comments
(including driver's license number). Records collected and maintained
for key issuance and management include; key holder name, email address
and signature, request ID, and key ID assigned.

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
    Information maintained in records are provided by individuals
seeking parking permits, access to facilities, or issuance of keys.
Additional information may be provided by FAA employees and contractors
reviewing and approving requests.

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES
OF USERS AND THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:
    In addition to other disclosures, generally permitted under 5
U.S.C. 552a(b) of the Privacy Act, all or a portion of the records or
information contained in this system may be disclosed outside DOT as a
routine use pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(3) as follows:
    1. In the event that a system of records maintained by DOT to carry
out its functions indicates a violation or potential violation of law,
whether civil, criminal or regulatory in nature, and whether arising by
general statute or particular program pursuant thereto, the relevant
records in the system of records may be referred, as a routine use, to
the appropriate agency, whether Federal, State, local or foreign,
charged with the responsibility of investigating or prosecuting such
violation or charged with enforcing or implementing the statute, or
rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant thereto.
    2. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a
routine use, to a Federal, State, or local agency maintaining civil,
criminal, or other relevant enforcement information or other pertinent
information, such as current licenses, if necessary to obtain
information relevant to a DOT decision concerning the hiring or
retention of an employee, the issuance of a security clearance, the
letting of a contract, or the issuance of a license, grant or other
benefit.
    3. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a
routine use, to a Federal agency, in response to its request, in
connection with the hiring or retention of an employee, the issuance of
a security clearance, the reporting of an investigation of an employee,
the letting of a contract, or the issuance of a license, grant, or
other benefit by the requesting agency, to the extent that the
information is relevant and necessary to the requesting agency's
decision on the matter.
    4. Routine Use for Disclosure for Use in Litigation. It shall be a
routine use of the records in this system of records to disclose them
to the Department of Justice or other Federal agency conducting
litigation when (a) DOT, or any agency thereof, or (b) Any employee of
DOT or any agency thereof (including a member of the Coast Guard), in
his/her official capacity, or (c) Any employee of DOT or any agency
thereof (including a member of the Coast Guard), in his/her individual
capacity where the Department of Justice has agreed to represent the
employee, or (d) The United States or any agency thereof, where DOT
determines that litigation is likely to affect the United States, is a
party to litigation or has an interest in such litigation, and the use
of such records by the Department of Justice or other Federal agency
conducting the litigation is deemed by DOT to be relevant and necessary
in the litigation, provided, however, that in each case, DOT determines
that disclosure of the records in the litigation is a use of the
information contained in the records that is compatible with the
purpose for which the records were collected. 4b. Routine Use for
Agency Disclosure in Other Proceedings. It shall be a routine use of
records in this system to disclose them in proceedings before any court
or adjudicative or administrative body before which DOT or any agency
thereof, appears, when (a) DOT, or any agency thereof, or (b) Any
employee of DOT or any agency thereof (including a member of the Coast
Guard) in his/her official capacity, or (c) Any employee of DOT or any
agency thereof (including a member of the Coast Guard) in his/her
individual capacity where DOT has agreed to represent the employee, or
(d) The United States or any agency thereof, where DOT determines that
the proceeding is likely to affect the United States, is a party to the
proceeding or has an interest in such proceeding, and DOT determines
that use of such records is relevant and necessary in the proceeding,
provided, however, that in each case, DOT determines that disclosure of
the records in the proceeding is a use of the information contained in
the records that is compatible with the purpose for which the records
were collected.
    5. The information contained in this system of records will be
disclosed to the Office of Management and Budget, OMB in connection
with the review of private relief legislation as set forth in OMB
Circular No. A-19 at any stage of the legislative coordination and
clearance process as set forth in that Circular.
    6. Disclosure may be made to a Congressional office from the record
of an individual in response to an inquiry from the Congressional
office made at the request of that individual. In such cases, however,
the Congressional office does not have greater rights to records than
the individual. Thus, the disclosure may be withheld from delivery to
the individual where the file contains investigative or actual
information or other materials which are being used, or are expected to
be used, to support prosecution or fines against the individual for
violations of a statute, or of regulations of the Department based on
statutory authority. No such limitations apply to records requested for
Congressional oversight or legislative purposes; release is authorized
under 49 CFR 10.35(9).
    7. One or more records from a system of records may be disclosed
routinely to the National Archives and Records Administration in
records management inspections being conducted under the authority of
44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906.
    8. Routine Use for disclosure to the Coast Guard and to
Transportation Security Administration. A record from this system of
records may be disclosed as a routine use to the Coast Guard and to the
Transportation Security Administration if information from this

system was shared with either agency when that agency was a component
of the Department of Transportation before its transfer to the
Department of Homeland Security and such disclosure is necessary to
accomplish a DOT, TSA or Coast Guard function related to this system of
records.
    9. DOT may make available to another agency or instrumentality of
any government jurisdiction, including State and local governments,
listings of names from any system of records in DOT for use in law
enforcement activities, either civil or criminal, or to expose
fraudulent claims, regardless of the stated purpose for the collection
of the information in the system of records. These enforcement
activities are generally referred to as matching programs because two
lists of names are checked for match using automated assistance. This
routine use is advisory in nature and does not offer unrestricted
access to systems of records for such law enforcement and related
antifraud activities. Each request will be considered on the basis of
its purpose, merits, cost effectiveness and alternatives using
Instructions on reporting computer matching programs to the Office of
Management and Budget, OMB, Congress, and the public, published by the
Director, OMB, dated September 20, 1989.
    10. It shall be a routine use of the information in any DOT system
of records to provide to the Attorney General of the United States, or
his/her designee, information indicating that a person meets any of the
disqualifications for receipt, possession, shipment, or transport of a
firearm under the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. In case of a
dispute concerning the validity of the information provided by DOT to
the Attorney General, or his/her designee, it shall be a routine use of
the information in any DOT system of records to make any disclosures of
such information to the National Background Information Check System,
established by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, as may be
necessary to resolve such dispute.
    11. a. To appropriate agencies, entities, and persons when (1) DOT
suspects or has confirmed that there has been a breach of the system of
records; (2) DOT has determined that as a result of the suspected or
confirmed breach there is a risk of harm to individuals, DOT (including
its information systems, programs, and operations), the Federal
Government, or national security; and (3) the disclosure made to such
agencies, entities, and persons is reasonably necessary to assist in
connection with DOT's efforts to respond to the suspected or confirmed
breach or to prevent, minimize, or remedy such harm.
    b. To another Federal agency or Federal entity, when DOT determines
that information from this system of records is reasonably necessary to
assist the recipient agency or entity in (1) responding to a suspected
or confirmed breach or (2) preventing, minimizing, or remedying the
risk of harm to individuals, the recipient agency or entity (including
its information systems, programs, and operations), the Federal
Government, or national security, resulting from a suspected or
confirmed breach.
    12. DOT may disclose records from this system, as a routine use, to
the Office of Government Information Services for the purpose of (a)
resolving disputes between FOIA requesters and Federal agencies and (b)
reviewing agencies' policies, procedures, and compliance in order to
recommend policy changes to Congress and the President.
    13. DOT may disclose records from this system, as a routine use, to
contractors and their agents, experts, consultants, and others
performing or working on a contract, service, cooperative agreement, or
other assignment for DOT, when necessary to accomplish an agency
function related to this system of records.
    14. DOT may disclose records from this system, as a routine use, to
an agency, organization, or individual for the purpose of performing
audit or oversight operations related to this system of records, but
only such records as are necessary and relevant to the audit or
oversight activity. This routine use does not apply to intra-agency
sharing authorized under Section (b)(1) of the Privacy Act.
    15. DOT may disclose from this system, as a routine use, records
consisting of, or relating to, terrorism information (6 U.S.C.
485(a)(5)), homeland security information (6 U.S.C. 482(f)(1)), or Law
enforcement information (Guideline 2 Report attached to White House
Memorandum, ``Information Sharing Environment, November 22, 2006) to a
Federal, State, local, tribal, territorial, foreign government and/or
multinational agency, either in response to its request or upon the
initiative of the Component, for purposes of sharing such information
as is necessary and relevant for the agencies to detect, prevent,
disrupt, preempt, and mitigate the effects of terrorist activities
against the territory, people, and interests of the United States of
America, as contemplated by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Prevention Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-458) and Executive Order 13388
(October 25, 2005).

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORAGE OF RECORDS:
    All records in this system are stored electronically. Records are
accessed by designated persons who have an official need for the
information. All electronic records for the system are backed up to an
offsite storage location to facilitate information recovery in the
event of a disaster or system failure that removes or makes local data
unavailable.

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETRIEVAL OF RECORDS:
    Records for parking (including parking violations) can be searched
by name, temporary badge number, vehicle tag number or vehicle decal
number. Records for visitor passes can be retrieved by name. Records
for key access management may be retrieved by name as well as request
ID and key ID assigned.

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETENTION AND DISPOSAL OF RECORDS:
    Per GRS 5.6 Item 111, visitor pass and parking records (including
parking violations) are retained for 2 years. Per GRS 5.6 Item 020, key
access records are retained and destroyed 3 years after return of key.
For all records, longer retention is authorized if required for
business use.

ADMINISTRATIVE, TECHNICAL, AND PHYSICAL SAFEGUARDS:
    Records in this system are safeguarded in accordance with
applicable rules and policies, including all applicable DOT automated
systems security and access policies. Strict controls have been imposed
to minimize the risk of compromising the information that is being
stored. Access to records in this system is limited to those
individuals who have a need to know the information for the performance
of their official duties and who have appropriate clearances or
permissions.

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
    Individuals seeking notification of whether this system of records
contains information about them may contact the System Manager at the
address provided in the section ``System Manager''. When seeking
records about yourself from this system of records or any other
Departmental system of records your request must conform to the Privacy
Act regulations set forth in 49 CFR part 10. You must sign your request
and your signature must either be notarized or

submitted under 28 U.S.C. 1746, a law that permits statements to be
made under penalty of perjury as a substitute for notarization. If your
request is seeking records pertaining to another living individual, you
must include a statement from that individual certifying his/her
agreement for you to access his/her records.

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
    See ``Record Access Procedures'' above.

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES:
    See ``Record Access Procedures'' above.

EXEMPTIONS PROMULGATED FOR THE SYSTEM:
    None.

HISTORY:
    Previous version of this system of records, DOT/FAA 807--Traffic
Control at the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center was published in the
Federal Register on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19519).

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Karyn Gorman,
Acting Departmental Chief Privacy Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-17945 Filed 8-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 140 (Monday, July 24, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47414-47415]
[FR Doc No: 2023-15403]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2023-0031; FRL-10954-01-R5]

Air Plan Approval; Michigan; DTE River Rouge

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a request submitted by the Michigan Department of Environment,
Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) on January 12, 2023, and supplemented on
April 19, 2023, to revise the Michigan state implementation plan (SIP)
for particulate matter (PM). The revision updates the fugitive dust
plan for Detroit Edison--River Rouge Power Plant (DTE Energy) located
in River Rouge, Michigan. The facility is no longer in operation and
therefore, the plan eliminates requirements to reflect plant shut down.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 23, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-

OAR-2023-0031 at https://www.regulations.gov or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Hatten, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>, [email protected]. The
EPA Region 5 office is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays and facility closures due to COVID-
19.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the state's SIP submittal as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no
further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the
direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received
will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed
rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For
additional information, see the direct final rule which is located in
the Rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: July 13, 2023.
Debra Shore,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2023-15403 Filed 7-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P