"Lee, Amanda I."<EMAIL_ADDRESS>12/04/2007 11:42 AM	To 	Aaron Levy/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 	cc 	 	bcc 	 	Subject 	FW: CUE Methyl Bromide Final Rulemaking:  USDA comments 	 						 	History:	 		This message has been forwarded.

-----Original Message----- From<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 7:14 AM To: Lee, Amanda I. Subject: RE: CUE Methyl Bromide Final Rulemaking: Final Informal Draft

Amanda,

Here are my comments:

Page 16:  "Dec. XIII/13" probably should be "Decision XIII/13"

Page 32:  Check grammar before available stocks equation

Page 74-75:  What is happening with NPMA assessment?

Page 90:  The second instance of "certain number" makes the section awkward.  Try using the following in place of "certain number" in the second part of the sentence: "below a level that allows one competitor to reasonably estimate the holdings of its competitors", or something like this.

Sorry that I can't give you a better review at this time.  Due to the circumstances, I will remove my "reservation" regarding the Emergency Rule as I cannot ensure that we will not miss the target of getting this rule signed on time.

Let me know if you have any questions about these comments.

Burleson 202-215-2149 (cell)


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 132 (Monday, July 11, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 44922]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16070]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Hazardous Materials: Delayed Applications

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: List of applications delayed more than 180 days.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(c),
PHMSA is publishing the following list of special permit applications
that have been in process for 180 days or more. The reason(s) for delay
and the expected completion date for action on each application is
provided in association with each identified application.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Paquet, Director, Office of
Hazardous Materials Special Permits and Approvals, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, East Building, PHH-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
Southeast, Washington, DC 20590-0001,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Key to ``Reason for Delay''

1. Awaiting additional information from applicant
2. Extensive public comment under review
3. Application is technically complex and is of significant impact or
precedent-setting and requires extensive analysis
4. Staff review delayed by other priority issues or volume of special
permit applications

Meaning of Application Number Suffixes

N --New application
M --Modification request
R --Renewal Request
P --Party To Exemption Request

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 28, 2016.
Ryan Paquet,
Director, Approvals and Permits.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Reason for    Estimated date
            Application No.                             Applicant                      delay       of completion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         Modification to Special Permits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16412-M................................  Nantong CIMC Tank Equipment Co. Ltd.,                 4      07-31-2016
                                          Jiangsu, Province.
13192-M................................  Thomas Gray & Associaties, Inc.,                      4      07-31-2016
                                          Orange, CA.
16035-M................................  LCF Systems, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ......               4      07-31-2016
7607-M.................................  Thermo Fisher Scientific, Franklin, MA.               4      07-31-2016
15537-M................................  Alaska Pacific Powder Company, Watkins,               4      07-31-2016
                                          CO.
15610-M................................  TechKnowServ Corp., State College, PA..               4      07-31-2016
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         New Special Permit Applications
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16559-N................................  HTEC Hydrogen Technology & Energy                     4      07-30-2016
                                          Corporation, North Vancouver, BC,
                                          Canada.
16615-N................................  Special Devices, Incorporated, Simi                   4      07-31-2016
                                          Valley, CA.
16524-N................................  Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies,                    4      07-15-2016
                                          Worldwide, Inc., Lake Forest, CA.
16620-N................................  Westeel Canada Inc., Winnipeg, Canada..               4      07-31-2016
15767-N................................  Union Pacific Railroad Company, Omaha,                3      07-31-2016
                                          NE.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      Party to Special Permits Application
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12412-P................................  Seaco Technologies, Inc., Bakersfield,                4      07-31-2016
                                          CA.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      Renewal Special Permits Applications
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7991-R.................................  Progress Rail Services, Corporation,                  4      07-31-2016
                                          Albertville, AL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2016-16070 Filed 7-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-60-M


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 7, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19915-19916]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09295]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP19-191-000]

Notice of Application; Texas Eastern Transmission, LP

    Take notice that on April 18, 2019, Texas Eastern Transmission, LP
(Texas Eastern), 5400 Westheimer Court, Houston, Texas 77056-5310,
filed in Docket No. CP19-191-000 an application pursuant to sections
7(b) and 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Part 157 of the
Commission's regulations for authorization to construct its proposed
Bernville Compressor Units Replacement Project (Project). The Project
consists of replacing two existing compressor units and related
facilities, with two new, more efficient compressor units at its
Bernville Compressor Station located in Berks County, Pennsylvania.
Texas Eastern asserts that the Project will allow this portion of its
system to comply with future air emission reduction requirements in
Pennsylvania.
    Specifically, Texas Eastern is requesting authorization to replace
two existing General Electric Company Frame 5 centrifugal natural gas-
fired turbines consisting of one 22,000 horsepower (hp) unit installed
in 1958, and one 19,800 hp unit installed in 1968, with a total station
certificated horsepower of 41,800 hp. Texas Eastern proposes to replace
these two existing units with one new 26,000 hp Solar Turbine, Inc.
(Solar) Titan 250 natural gas-fired turbine and one new 18,100 hp Solar
Titan 130 natural gas-fired turbine. Texas Eastern states that it will
install software controls on the 26,000 hp Solar Titan 250 turbine to
limit the horsepower on that turbine to 23,700 hp, so that the total
designed horsepower and delivery capacity at the Bernville Compressor
Station will remain substantially the same. Texas Eastern estimates the
cost of the Project to be $125,443,261, all as more fully set forth in
the application which is on file with the Commission and open to public
inspection.
    The filing is available for review at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's website web at
http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY,
(202) 502-8659.
    Any questions regarding this application should be directed to Lisa
A. Connolly, Director, Rates and Certificates, Texas Eastern
Transmission, LP, P.O. Box 1642, Houston, Texas 77251-1642, by
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, by facsimile at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules (18 CFR 157.9),
within 90 days of this Notice, the Commission staff will either:
complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18

CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party status will be placed on the
service list maintained by the Secretary of the Commission and will
receive copies of all documents filed by the applicant and by all other
parties. A party must submit 3 copies of filings made with the
Commission and must provide a copy to the applicant and to every other
party in the proceeding. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for
court review of Commission orders in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list and will be
notified of any meetings associated with the Commission's environmental
review process. Environmental commentors will not be required to serve
copies of filed documents on all other parties. However, the non-party
commentors will not receive copies of all documents filed by other
parties or issued by the Commission and will not have the right to seek
court review of the Commission's final order.
    As of the February 27, 2018 date of the Commission's order in
Docket No. CP16-4-001, the Commission will apply its revised practice
concerning out-of-time motions to intervene in any new Natural Gas Act
section 3 or section 7 proceeding.\1\ Persons desiring to become a
party to a certificate proceeding are to intervene in a timely manner.
If seeking to intervene out-of-time, the movant is required to ``show
good cause why the time limitation should be waived,'' and should
provide justification by reference to factors set forth in Rule
214(d)(1) of the Commission's Rules and Regulations.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C., 162 FERC ] 61,167 at
] 50 (2018).
    \2\ 18 CFR 385.214(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 3 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington,
DC 20426.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 21, 2019.

    Dated: April 30, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-09295 Filed 5-6-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


	ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

	40 CFR Part 52

	[EPA-R03-OAR-2005-VA-0011; FRL-         ]

	Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Commonwealth of Virginia; Control of Particulate Matter From Pulp and
Paper Mills

AGENCY:	Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION:	Final rule.

SUMMARY:  EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia.  The revision pertains to
amendments to an existing regulation to control particulate matter from
pulp and paper mills.  EPA is approving this SIP revision in accordance
with the Clean Air Act (CAA).

EFFECTIVE DATE:  This final rule is effective on [insert date 30 days
from date of publication].

ADDRESSES:  EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
ID Number EPA-R03-OAR-2005-VA-0011.  All documents in the docket are
listed in the www.regulations.gov website.   Although listed in the
electronic docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e.,
confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.  Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.  Publicly available docket materials
are available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in
hard copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State
submittal are available at the Virginia Department of Environmental
Quality, 629 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia, 23219.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  LaKeshia Robertson,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
by e-mail at   HYPERLINK<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I.	Background

On July 3, 2007 (72 FR 36404), EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the Commonwealth of Virginia.  The NPR proposed
approval of Virginia’s plan to control particulate matter emissions
from pulp and paper mills (9 VAC 5, Chapter 40, Article 13, Rule 4-13).
The formal SIP revision was submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia on
June 21, 2005.  Other specific requirements of Virginia’s plan to
control particulate matter from pulp and paper mills and the rational
for EPA’s proposed action are explained in the NPR and will not be
restated here.  No public comments were received on the NPR.

II.  General Information Pertaining to SIP Submittals From the
Commonwealth of Virginia

In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation that provides, subject to certain
conditions, for an environmental assessment (audit) (privilege(' for
voluntary compliance evaluations performed by a regulated entity.  The
legislation further addresses the relative burden of proof for parties
either asserting the privilege or seeking disclosure of documents for
which the privilege is claimed.  Virginia's legislation also provides,
subject to certain conditions, for a penalty waiver for violations of
environmental laws when a regulated entity discovers such violations
pursuant to a voluntary compliance evaluation and voluntarily discloses
such violations to the Commonwealth and takes prompt and appropriate
measures to remedy the violations.  Virginia's Voluntary Environmental
Assessment Privilege Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1198, provides a privilege
that protects from disclosure documents and information about the
content of those documents that are the product of a voluntary
environmental assessment. The Privilege Law does not extend to documents
or information (1) that are generated or developed before the
commencement of a voluntary environmental assessment; (2) that are
prepared independently of the assessment process; (3) that demonstrate a
clear, imminent and substantial danger to the public health or
environment; or (4) that are required by law.

On January 12, 1998, the Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the
Attorney General provided a legal opinion that states that the Privilege
law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1198,  precludes granting a privilege to
documents and information (required by law,( including documents and
information (required by Federal law to maintain program delegation,
authorization or approval,( since Virginia must (enforce Federally
authorized environmental programs in a manner that is no less stringent
than their Federal counterparts. . . .(   The opinion concludes that
([r]egarding ( 10.1-1198, therefore, documents or other information
needed for civil or criminal enforcement under one of these programs
could not be privileged because such documents and information are
essential to pursuing enforcement in a manner required by Federal law to
maintain program delegation, authorization or approval.(

Virginia's Immunity law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1199, provides that ([t]o
the extent consistent with requirements imposed by Federal law,(  any
person making a voluntary disclosure of information to a state agency
regarding a violation of an environmental statute, regulation, permit,
or administrative order is granted immunity from administrative or civil
penalty.  The Attorney General's January 12, 1998 opinion states that
the quoted language renders this statute inapplicable to enforcement of
any Federally authorized programs, since (no immunity could be afforded
from administrative, civil, or criminal penalties because granting such
immunity would not be consistent with Federal law, which is one of the
criteria for immunity.(

Therefore, EPA has determined that Virginia's Privilege and Immunity
statutes will not preclude the Commonwealth from enforcing its program
consistent with the Federal requirements.  In any event, because EPA has
also determined that a state audit privilege and immunity law can affect
only state enforcement and cannot have any impact on Federal enforcement
authorities, EPA may at any time invoke its authority under the CAA,
including, for example, sections 113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to enforce
the requirements or prohibitions of the state plan, independently of any
state enforcement effort.  In addition, citizen enforcement under
section 304 of the Clean Air Act is likewise unaffected by this, or any,
state audit privilege or immunity law.

III.	Final Action

EPA is approving the amendments to an existing regulation (9 VAC 5,
Chapter 40, Article 13, Rule 4-13) submitted on June 21, 2005 as a
revision to the Virginia SIP.

IV.   Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A.   General Requirements

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action
is not a "significant regulatory action" and therefore is not subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget.  For this reason, this
action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, "Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use" (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).  This action merely approves state law
as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law.  Accordingly, the Administrator
certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).  Because this rule approves pre-existing
requirements under state law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain
any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Public Law 104-4).   This rule also does not have tribal implications
because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).  This action also
does not have Federalism implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).  This
action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal requirement,
and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the CAA.  This rule also is not subject
to Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children from Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks( (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it
approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard.

In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA(s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA.  In this context, in
the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use
voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove
a SIP submission for failure to use VCS.  It would thus be inconsistent
with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use
VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions
of the CAA.  Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do
not apply.  This rule does not impose an information collection burden
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).

B.   Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the
rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to
each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United
States.   EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register.  This rule is not a
(major rule( as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

C.  Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by [insert date 60 days from date of publication of
this document in the Federal Register].  Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action, approving the amendments to Virginia’s regulation to
control particulate matter from pulp and paper mills, may not be
challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements.  (See
section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

_________________
___________/s/________________

Dated:   October 10, 2007     				William T. Wisniewski,
                								Acting Regional Administrator,

                                  					Region III.

40 CFR Part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52 - [AMENDED]

1.  The authority citation for 40 CFR part 52 continues to read as
follows:

               Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart VV ( Virginia

2.  In ( 52.2420, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising the
entries for Article 13 (title), 5-40-1660, 5-40-1670, 5-40-1750, and
5-40-1810 to read as follows:

( 52.2420  	Identification of plan.

*	*	*	*	*

 (c) * * *

EPA-APPROVED VIRGINIA REGULATIONS AND STATUTES

State citation     (9 VAC 5)

Title/subject

State effective date

EPA approval date

Explanation [former SIP citation]

*     *     *     *     *    *     *

Chapter 40	Existing Stationary Sources

*     *     *     *     *    *     *

Part II

Emission Standards

*     *     *     *     *    *     *

Article 13  	Emission Standards From Kraft Pulp and Paper Mills (Rule
4-13)

5-40-1660	Applicability and designation of affected facilities	04/01/99
[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number where the
document begins]

	5-40-1670	Definitions 	04/01/99	[Insert Federal Register publication
date] [Insert page number where the document begins]	Added: Neutral
sulfite semichemical pulping operation, New design recovery furnace,
Pulp and paper mill, Semichemical pulping process;

Revised: Cross recovery furnace, Straight kraft recovery furnace, Total
reduced sulfur;

Removed:

Agreement

* * * * * * *

5-40-1750	Compliance	04/01/99	[Insert Federal Register publication date]
[Insert page number where the document begins]

	* * * * * * *

5-40-1810	Permits	04/01/99	[Insert Federal Register publication date]
[Insert page number where the document begins]

	*     *     *     *     *    *     *

*    *     *     *      *

 PAGE  7

 PAGE  8


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6099-6101]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02046]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee--New Task

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of continuing a task assignment for the Aviation
Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA assigned the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee
(ARAC) a continuation of a task to provide recommendations regarding
standards, training guidance, test management, and reference materials
for airman certification purposes. The FAA added the Aircraft Mechanic
Certificate with Airframe and/or Powerplant ratings to the existing
list of certificates and ratings for which the ARAC will provide
recommendations. This notice informs the public of the continuing ARAC
activity and solicits additional membership for the existing Airman
Certification System Working Group (ACS WG).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Van L. Kerns, Manager, Regulatory
Support Division, FAA Flight Standards Service, AFS 600, FAA Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

ARAC Acceptance of Task

    As a result of the December 17, 2015 ARAC meeting, the FAA assigned
and ARAC accepted and designated this continuation of task to the ACS
WG. The ACS WG continues to serve as staff to the ARAC and continues to
provide advice and recommendations on the continued assigned task. The
ARAC will review and accept the recommendation report and will submit
it to the FAA.

Background

    The FAA established the ARAC to provide information, advice, and
recommendations on aviation related issues that could result in
rulemaking to the FAA Administrator, through the Associate
Administrator of Aviation Safety.

    On December 19, 2013, ARAC accepted the FAA's assignment of a new
task to establish an Airman Certification System Working Group (ACS WG)
to assist in the development of standards, training guidance, test
management, and reference materials for airman certification testing.
The FAA announced the ARAC's acceptance of this task through a Federal
Register Notice published on January 29, 2014 [79 FR 4800]. The
original task focused on the Private Pilot, Commercial Pilot, Airline
Transport Pilot, and Authorized Instructor certificates and the
Instrument Rating. The ACS WG has made significant progress toward
completion of this work. The FAA is now assigning ARAC to continue and
expand the ACS WG's task to include development of recommended
standards, training guidance, test management, and reference materials
for the Aircraft Mechanic Certificate (AMC) with Airframe and/or
Powerplant ratings and to add members with expertise in 14 CFR parts 65
and 147 to assist in this work. The addition of the AMC task arises
from FAA and aviation industry recognition that the integrated Airman
Certification Standards approach will address the compelling need to
improve and update aircraft mechanic testing and training materials.

The Task

    The ACS WG will provide advice and recommendations to the ARAC on
the development of standards, training guidance, test management, and
reference materials for the AMC with Airframe and/or Powerplant
ratings.
    1. In developing this report, the ACS WG, including its new
members, shall familiarize itself with:
    a. A report to the FAA from the Airman Testing Standards and
Training Aviation Rulemaking Committee: Recommendations to Enhance
Airman Knowledge Test Content and Its Processes and Methodologies for
Training and Testing (www.faa.gov/aircraft/draft_docs/arc);
    b. A report from the Airman Testing Standards and Training Working
Group to the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee;
    c. Aeronautical knowledge and proficiency standards set forth in 14
CFR part 61, Certification: Pilots, Flight Instructors, and Ground
Instructors; 14 CFR part 65 Certification: Airman Other Than Flight
Crewmembers, subpart D, Mechanics, and Subpart E, Repairmen;
    d. FAA Airman Knowledge Test Guides (FAA-G-8082-17E, FAA-G-8082-3A,
FAA-G-8082-11C, FAA-G-8082-19);
    e. Current Practical Test Standards documents for Private Pilot
Airplane (FAA-S-8081-14B); Flight Instructor Airplane (FAA-S-8081-6C);
Instrument Rating for Airplane, Helicopter, and Powered Lift (FAA-S-
8081-4E);
    f. Current Practical Test Standards documents for Aviation Mechanic
General (FAA-S-8081-26A); Aviation Mechanic Airframe Practical Test
Standards (FAA-S-8081-27A); and Aviation Mechanic Powerplant Practical
Test Standards (FAA-S-8081-28A);
    g. Current FAA guidance materials, to include the Pilot's Handbook
of Aeronautical Knowledge (FAA-H-8083-25A); the Airplane Flying
Handbook (FAA-H-8083-3A); the Aviation Instructor's Handbook (FAA-H-
8083-9A); the Instrument Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-15A); the
Instrument Procedures Handbook (FAA-H-8083-1A); the Aviation
Maintenance Technician Handbook- General (FAA-H-8083-30), the Aviation
Maintenance Technician Handbook Airframe (FAA-H-8083-31) Volumes 1 and
2; the Aviation Maintenance Technician Handbook Powerplant (FAA-H-8083-
32) Volumes 1 and 2; the Aircraft Weight and Balance Handbook (FAA-H-
8083-1A); and the appropriate FAA Airman Knowledge Testing Supplements
(FAA-CT-8080 series documents).
    2. FAA has specifically tasked the ACS WG to support the FAA's goal
to enhance aviation safety by providing a means for the aviation
industry to provide expert assistance and industry views to the FAA's
Flight Standards Service (AFS) on the development, modification, and
continued alignment of the major components of the airman certification
system, which include:
    a. The ACS for airman certificates and ratings (i.e. 8081-series
documents);
    b. Associated training guidance material (e.g., H-series
handbooks);
    c. Test management (e.g., test question development, test question
boarding, test composition/test ``mapping,'' and CT-8080-series
figures); and
    d. Reference materials, to include AFS directives and Aviation
Safety Inspector guidance; FAA Orders, Advisory Circulars (ACs), and
other documents pertaining to the airman certification system.
    3. Develop a report containing recommendations on the findings and
results of the tasks explained above.
    a. The recommendation report should document both majority and
dissenting positions on the findings and the rationale for each
position.
    b. Any disagreements should be documented, including the rationale
for each position and the reasons for the disagreement.
    4. After the FAA accepts the recommendation report, the FAA may
task the ARAC ACS WG to complete the following additional tasks:
    a. Provide recommendations for regular industry review of
standards, guidance, and test management for each airman certificate or
rating included in this task;
    b. Provide prioritized recommendations for applying the Airman
Certification Standards framework to other airman certifications and
ratings;
    5. The ACS WG may be reinstated to assist the ARAC by responding to
the FAA's questions or concerns after the recommendation report has
been submitted.

Schedule

    The recommendation report should be submitted to the FAA for review
and acceptance no later than 30 months from the publication date in the
Federal Register.
    This tasking notice requires two recommendation reports.
     As tasked on December 19, 2013, published on January 29,
2014 [79 FR 4800], and amended at the ARAC's September 17, 2015
meeting, the ACS WG must submit an initial recommendation report
covering the ARAC ACS Working Group's initial tasking for the Private
Pilot, Commercial Pilot, Airline Transport Pilot, and Instructor
certificates and the Instrument Rating to the FAA for review and
acceptance no later than December, 2016.
     The addendum recommendation report on the new AMC task
must be submitted to the FAA for review and acceptance no later than
December, 2017.

Working Group Activity

    The ACS WG must comply with the procedures adopted by the ARAC and
are as follows:
    1. Conduct a review and analysis of the assigned tasks and any
other related materials or documents.
    2. Draft and submit a work plan for completion of the task,
including the rationale supporting such a plan, for consideration by
the ARAC.
    3. Provide a status report at each ARAC meeting.
    4. Draft and submit the recommendation report based on the review
and analysis of the assigned tasks.
    5. Present the recommendation reports at the ARAC meeting.

Continued Participation in the Working Group/Addition of New Members

    The existing ACS WG continues to be comprised of technical experts
having an interest in the assigned task, and the FAA is now soliciting
up to five new members with expertise in the aviation maintenance
training and testing fields, specifically involving 14 CFR parts 65 and
147. The provisions of the August 13, 2014, Office of Management and
Budget guidance, ``Revised Guidance on Appointment of Lobbyists to
Federal Advisory Committees, Boards, and Commissions'' (79 FR 47482),
continues the ban on registered lobbyists participating on Agency
Boards and Commissions if participating in their ``individual
capacity.'' The revised guidance now allows registered lobbyists to
participate on Agency Boards and Commissions in a ``representative
capacity'' for the ``express purpose of providing a committee with the
views of a nongovernmental entity, a recognizable group of persons or
nongovernmental entities (an industry, sector, labor unions, or
environmental groups, etc.) or state or local government.'' (For
further information see Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) as
amended, 2 U.S.C. 1603, 1604, and 1605.)
    If you wish to become a member of the ACS WG for the purpose of
assisting with the new AMT task, write the person listed under the
caption FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT expressing that desire.
Describe your interest in the task and state the expertise you would
bring to the working group. The FAA must receive all requests by March
7, 2016. The ARAC and the FAA will review the requests and advise you
whether or not your request is approved.
    The members of the Airman Certification System Working Group must
actively participate, attend all meetings, and provide written comments
when requested. The members must devote the resources necessary to
support the working group in meeting any assigned deadlines. The
members must keep management and those represented advised of the
working group activities and decisions to ensure the proposed technical
solutions do not conflict with the position of those represented.
    The Secretary of Transportation determined the formation and use of
the ARAC is necessary and in the public interest in connection with the
performance of duties imposed on the FAA by law.
    The ARAC meetings are open to the public. However, meetings of the
ACS WG are not open to the public, except to the extent individuals
with an interest and expertise are selected to participate. The FAA
will make no public announcement of working group meetings.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 28, 2016.
Lirio Liu,
Designated Federal Officer, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2016-02046 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 200 (Thursday, October 15, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65193-65197]
[FR Doc No: 2020-22725]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0209; Product Identifier 2020-NM-004-AD; Amendment
39-21275; AD 2020-21-02]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Kidde Aerospace & Defense

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Kidde Aerospace & Defense cargo fire extinguisher halon bottles
installed on various transport category airplanes. This AD was prompted
by a report indicating that certain cargo fire extinguisher halon
bottles installed in the cargo compartment had low charge pressure.
This AD requires an inspection to determine the part number and serial
number of the cargo fire extinguisher halon bottles and replacement of
affected parts with serviceable parts. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective November 19, 2020.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of November 19,
2020.

ADDRESSES: For Boeing service information identified in this final
rule, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual &
Data Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach,
CA 90740-5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. For Kidde Aerospace & Defense service
information identified in this final rule contact Kidde Aerospace &
Defense, 4200 Airport Drive NW, Building B, Wilson, NC 27896-8630;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; http://kiddetechnologies.com/aviation/. You may
view this service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products
Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0209.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0209; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, any comments received, and other information. The
address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Belete, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Section, FAA, Atlanta ACO Branch, 1701 Columbia
Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to Kidde Aerospace &
Defense cargo fire extinguisher halon bottles installed on various
transport category airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on March 30, 2020 (85 FR 17507). The NPRM was prompted by a
report indicating that certain cargo fire extinguisher halon bottles
installed in the cargo compartment had low charge pressure. The NPRM
proposed to require an inspection to determine the part number and
serial number of the cargo fire extinguisher halon bottles and
replacement of affected parts with serviceable parts.

Comments

    The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule. The following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.

Support for the NPRM

    Boeing concurred with the content of the NPRM. United Airlines
agreed with the intent of the NPRM.

Request To Reduce the Compliance Time

    The Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA) requested
that the compliance time specified in the proposed AD be reduced from
24 months to 12 months. The commenter stated that a compliance time of
12 months was specified in the Kidde Aerospace service information.
    The FAA disagrees with the commenter's request. The preamble of the
NPRM included an explanation regarding the compliance time. As stated
in the NPRM, the Kidde Aerospace & Defense service information
specifies a compliance time of 12 months to do the inspection and
accomplish the replacement, and the Boeing service information
specifies a compliance time of 24 months to accomplish the replacement.
In developing an appropriate compliance time for this action, the FAA
considered the urgency associated with the subject unsafe condition,
the availability of required parts, and the practical aspects of
accomplishing the required replacement within a period of time that
corresponds to the normal scheduled maintenance for most affected
operators. In light of these items, the FAA determined that a 24-month
compliance time is appropriate and adequate to address the unsafe
condition. The FAA has not revised this AD in regard to this issue.

Request To Provide Detailed Information for Bottle Test and Refill

    Southwest Airlines requested that paragraphs (g), (h), and (i) of
the proposed AD be revised to provide, or refer to, detailed
instructions on how to test and refill cargo fire extinguisher halon
bottles prior to marking them with a ``G'' stamp and returning them to
service. The commenter stated that it understood the intent of the NPRM
was to have the unsafe condition removed from operational airplanes by
having affected cargo fire extinguisher halon bottles removed and not
reinstalled until the halon bottles had been tested, refilled, and
marked with a ``G'' stamp. The commenter suggested that these actions
could be accomplished via standard airplane maintenance manual (AMM)
processes instead of using the procedures in the Boeing service
information that was specified in the proposed AD.
    The FAA does not agree with the commenter's request. The
information provided in paragraphs (g), (h), and (i) of this AD is
specific and complete enough to address the unsafe condition. The
affected cargo fire extinguisher halon bottles are installed on various
transport category airplanes, and as such, referring to specific AMMs
is not practical. Furthermore, the FAA notes that only halon bottles
having certain serial numbers are affected and need to be replaced.
There are a significant number of cargo fire extinguisher halon bottles
with serial numbers that are not affected by the requirements of this
AD and that do not need to be removed and tested. Operators have the
option of installing a halon bottle with a serial number that is not
affected by the requirements of this AD, or installing a halon bottle
that has been refurbished by an authorized party. If operators
establish a different procedure to refurbish affected cargo fire
extinguisher halon bottles, they can apply for an alternative method of
compliance by using the procedures described in paragraph (l) of this
AD. The FAA has not revised this AD in regard to this issue.

Explanation of Change to Manufacturer's Name Specified in This Final
Rule

    The FAA has revised paragraph (c)(2)(iv) of this AD to identify the

manufacturer name as MHI RJ Aviation UL (instead of Bombardier, Inc.),
as published in the most recent type certificate data sheet for the
affected models.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments
received, and determined that air safety and the public interest
require adopting this final rule with the change described previously
and minor editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these minor
changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related IBR Material Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed the following Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletins.
This service information describes procedures for an inspection to
determine the serial number of the cargo fire extinguisher halon bottle
having a certain part number and replacing affected parts with
serviceable parts. These documents are distinct since they apply to
different airplane models.
     Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-26A1150 RB, dated
September 27, 2019.
     Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-26A1151 RB, dated
September 27, 2019.
    The FAA reviewed the following Kidde Aerospace & Defense service
information. This service information describes, among other actions,
procedures for replacing affected fire extinguishers (referred to as
``cargo fire extinguisher halon bottles'' in this AD) with serviceable
parts. These documents are distinct since they apply to different
airplane models.
     Service Bulletin 473919-26-521, Rev 02, dated November 7,
2019.
     Service Bulletin 473957-26-518, Rev 02, dated November 4,
2019.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 3,308 appliances installed
on, but not limited to, the transport category airplanes identified in
paragraphs (c)(2)(i) through (vii) of this AD. The FAA estimates the
following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection............................  2 work-hours x $85 per                $0            $170        $562,360
                                         hour = $170.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary
replacements that would be required based on the results of the
inspection. The FAA has no way of determining the number of aircraft
that might need replacements:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                    Action                                 Labor cost               Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement...................................  4 work-hours x $85 per hour =            $25,305         $25,645
                                                 $340.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to manufacturer for the cargo fire extinguisher halon
bottles, some or all of the costs of this AD may be covered under
warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected individuals. The
FAA does not control warranty coverage for affected individuals. As a
result, the FAA has included all known costs in the cost estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2020-21-02 Transport Category Airplanes: Amendment 39-21275; Docket
No. FAA-2020-0209; Product Identifier 2020-NM-004-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective November 19, 2020.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    (1) This AD applies to the Kidde Aerospace & Defense cargo fire
extinguisher halon bottles having part numbers and serial numbers
identified in Table 1 of the service information identified in
paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii) of this AD.
    (i) Kidde Aerospace & Defense Service Bulletin 473957-26-518,
Rev 02, dated November 4, 2019.
    (ii) Kidde Aerospace & Defense Service Bulletin 473919-26-521,
Rev 02, dated November 7, 2019.
    (2) These affected cargo fire extinguisher halon bottles are
installed on various transport category airplanes including, but not
limited to, the airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(2)(i) through
(vii) of this AD, certificated in any category.
    (i) Airbus Canada Limited Partnership (type certificate
previously held by C Series Aircraft Limited Partnership (CSALP);
Bombardier, Inc.) Model BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 airplanes.
    (ii) Airbus SAS Model A330-200 and A330-300 series airplanes.
    (iii) The Boeing Company Model DC-9-81 (MD-81) airplanes, and
Model 737 series airplanes.
    (iv) MHI RJ Aviation ULC (type certificate previously held by
Bombardier, Inc.) Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440)
airplanes, Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702)
airplanes, and Model CL-600-2C11 (Regional Jet Series 550)
airplanes.
    (v) De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited (type certificate
previously held by Bombardier, Inc.) Model DHC-8-400 series
airplanes.
    (vi) Embraer S.A. Model ERJ 170-100 STD airplanes, and Model ERJ
190-100 STD, -300, and -400 airplanes.
    (vii) Saab AB, Saab Aeronautics (formerly known as Saab AB, Saab
Aeronautics) Model SAAB 2000 airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 26, Fire
protection.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report indicating that certain cargo
fire extinguisher halon bottles had low charge pressure. Low charge
pressure of a cargo fire extinguisher halon bottle installed in the
cargo compartment, if not addressed, could result in insufficient
halon concentrations to extinguish a fire in the cargo compartment.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Definitions

    For this AD, the definitions specified in paragraphs (g)(1)
through (3) of this AD apply.
    (1) Group 1: Boeing Model 737-8 and 737-9 airplanes, and Model
737-700, 737-800, and 737-900ER series airplanes.
    (2) Group 2: Transport category airplanes other than those
identified as group 1. (3) Affected part: A cargo fire extinguisher
halon bottle, manufactured by Kidde Aerospace & Defense, having a
part number and serial number that is identified in the service
information identified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii) of this AD.

    Note 1 to paragraph (g)(3): The terms ``cargo fire extinguisher
halon bottles'' and ``fire extinguishers'' are used interchangeably
in this AD and the service information identified in paragraphs
(c)(1)(i) and (ii) of this AD, and in paragraphs (i)(1)(i) and (ii)
of this AD.

(h) Inspection

    Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, do an
inspection to determine the part number and serial number of the
cargo fire extinguisher halon bottles installed in the cargo
compartment. A review of maintenance records can be done in lieu of
the inspection provided the part number and serial number of the
cargo fire extinguisher halon bottles can be conclusively determined
from that review.

(i) Replacement

    If, during the inspection or records review required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, it is determined that an affected part, as
identified in paragraph (g)(3) of this AD, is installed, before
further flight, replace the part with a serviceable part in
accordance with the applicable service information identified in
paragraph (i)(1) and (2) of this AD.
    (1) For group 1 airplanes as identified in paragraph (g)(1) of
this AD: The Accomplishment Instructions of the service information
identified in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this AD, or the service
information identified in paragraph (i)(1)(i) or (ii) of this AD, as
applicable.
    (i) Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-26A1150 RB, dated
September 27, 2019.
    (ii) Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-26A1151 RB, dated
September 27, 2019.
    (2) For group 2 airplanes as identified in paragraph (g)(2) of
this AD: The Accomplishment Instructions of the service information
identified in paragraph (c)(1)(i) or (ii) of this AD, as applicable.

(j) Parts Installation Limitation

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install on
any airplane an affected part as identified in paragraph (g)(3) of
this AD unless that part has a circled letter ``G'' stamped at a
distance of approximately one inch from the left edge of the
placard, indicating that the cargo fire extinguisher halon bottle
has been tested and refilled.

(k) Special Flight Permit

    If low pressure is detected or a warning is displayed in the
flight deck, special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate the airplane to a location where
the cargo fire extinguisher halon bottles can be replaced or
modified.

(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (m) of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as Required for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs
(l)(3)(i) and (ii) of this AD apply.
    (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
    (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.

(m) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Samuel Belete,
Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Section, FAA, Atlanta ACO
Branch, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; phone: 404-
474-5580; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-26A1150 RB, dated
September 27, 2019.
    (ii) Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-26A1151 RB, dated
September 27, 2019.
    (iii) Kidde Aerospace & Defense Service Bulletin 473919-26-521,
Rev 02, dated November 7, 2019.
    (iv) Kidde Aerospace & Defense Service Bulletin 473957-26-518,
Rev 02, dated November 4, 2019.
    (3) For Boeing service information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal

Beach, CA 90740-5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) For Kidde Aerospace & Defense service information identified
in this AD, contact Kidde Aerospace & Defense, 4200 Airport Drive
NW, Building B, Wilson, NC 27896-8630; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
http://kiddetechnologies.com/aviation/.
    (5) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (6) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on October 1, 2020.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-22725 Filed 10-14-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: February 6, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 24)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 6028-6030]
[DOCID:fr06fe06-13]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2005-MD-0014; FRL-8028-3]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Amendments to the Control of VOC Emissions From Yeast
Manufacturing

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by Maryland. This revision pertains to the amendment
of a regulation that controls volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions
from yeast manufacturing facilities. This action is being taken under
the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before March 8, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2005-MD-0014 by one of the following methods:
    A. Http://http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for

submitting comments.
    B. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2005-MD-0014, Makeba Morris, Chief, Air
Quality Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
    D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2005-MD-0014. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change, and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal

information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site

is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be

automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.

    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some

information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov
 or in hard copy during normal business hours at the

Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region
III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the
State submittal are available at the Maryland Department of the
Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore, Maryland,
21230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose Quinto,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by e-
mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 31, 2005, the Maryland Department
of the Environment (MDE) submitted a revision to the Maryland SIP. The
SIP revision consists of amendments to COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>--Control of
VOC Emissions from Yeast Manufacturing.

I. Background

    COMAR <IP_ADDRESS> contains requirements for the control of VOC
emissions from sources that manufacture yeast. In 2004, the regulation
was amended to clarify requirements for sources that manufacture both
nutritional yeast and specialty yeast. The amendment provided more
flexibility for sources that could manufacture specialty yeast and meet
VOC standards that were developed for the lower emitting nutritional
yeast. The amendment also included changes that made Maryland's
regulation consistent with EPA's maximum achievable control technology
(MACT) standards for nutritional yeast. In addition, the amendment
required sources to demonstrate that the standards were met at least 98
percent of the time for each 12-month period.

II. Summary of SIP Revision

    The amendments submitted on October 31, 2005 to COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>
are: (1) To reinstate the requirements for non-nutritional and
specialty yeast installations to meet certain operational requirements
to minimize VOC emissions, and (2) to clarify the 98 percent compliance
demonstration is a 12-month rolling average.
    The amendment requires pure culture and yeasting installations
(non-nutritional and specialty yeast installations) to monitor
temperature, pH, and sugar content of the batch to minimize the
formation and emission of VOC. The amendment also requires batch
production information be collected each month and that the semi-annual
reports submitted to MDE include this monthly data. The semi-annual
report shall include: (1) A summary of the number of batches for each
month and calculations showing the percent of batches that met the VOC
standards for each month, and (2) calculations showing the percent of
batches that met the VOC standards during the previous six 12-month
rolling average periods. Affected sources are required to meet the VOC
standards for at least 98 percent of the batches produced during each
rolling 12-month period, beginning July 1, 2004.

III. Proposed Action

    EPA is proposing to approve the Maryland SIP revision for the
amendments to the regulation regarding the control of VOC emissions
from yeast manufacturing facilities, which was submitted on October 31,
2005. Implementation of these amendments will result in the reduction
of VOC emissions from yeast manufacturing facilities. EPA is soliciting
public comments on the issues discussed in this document. These
comments will be considered before taking final action.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
proposed action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and
therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)).
This action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that
this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule proposes to approve pre-
existing requirements under state law and does not impose any
additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does
not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect
small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Public Law 104-4). This proposed rule also does not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
merely proposes to approve a state rule implementing a Federal
requirement, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This
proposed rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required by section 3
of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this proposed rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and
provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining
the takings implications of the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney
General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and
Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive order.
    This proposed rule pertaining to Maryland's amendments to the
regulations pertaining to the control of VOC emissions from yeast

manufacturing facilities, does not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Ozone, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: January 26, 2006.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. E6-1596 Filed 2-3-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 15, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57206-57207]
[FR Doc No: 2020-20246]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER20-2618-000.
    Applicants: Thordin ApS.
    Description: Supplement (Revised Transmittal Letter) to August 6,
2020 Thordin ApS tariff filing.
    Filed Date: 9/3/20.
    Accession Number: 20200903-5205.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/24/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-2806-000.
    Applicants: Lightsource Renewable Energy Development, LLC.
    Description: Petition for Limited Waiver, et al. of Lightsource
Renewable Energy Development, LLC.
    Filed Date: 9/2/20.
    Accession Number: 20200902-5279.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/16/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-2828-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of W3-002
ISA, SA No. 2782 to be effective 11/7/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/4/20.
    Accession Number: 20200904-5150.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-2829-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of Colorado.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2020-09-04_OATT Att O-SPS
Transmission Template AGIS-Filing to be effective 1/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/4/20.
    Accession Number: 20200904-5151.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-2830-000.
    Applicants: PPM Roaring Brook, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for Market-Based
Rate Authorization, Request for Related Waivers to be effective 11/4/
2020.
    Filed Date: 9/4/20.
    Accession Number: 20200904-5154.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-2831-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of ISA,
No. 2823 to be effective 11/7/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/4/20.
    Accession Number: 20200904-5161.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-2832-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Letter Agreement NextEra
Desert Center Blythe, LLC SA No. 252 to be effective 9/9/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/8/20.
    Accession Number: 20200908-5101.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/29/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-2833-000.
    Applicants: Antelope Expansion 3A, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Antelope Expansion 3A, LLC
Certificate of Concurrence to be effective 9/9/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/8/20.
    Accession Number: 20200908-5124.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/29/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-2834-000.
    Applicants: Antelope Expansion 3B, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Antelope Expansion 3B, LLC
Certificate of Concurrence to be effective 9/9/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/8/20.
    Accession Number: 20200908-5129.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/29/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-2835-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation SCE
Connections Agreement RS No. 495 to be effective 7/30/2016.
    Filed Date: 9/8/20.
    Accession Number: 20200908-5132.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/29/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-2836-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 1168R2 Smoky Hills Wind Farm
LGIA to be effective 8/6/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/8/20.
    Accession Number: 20200908-5146.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/29/20.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by

clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 8, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-20246 Filed 9-14-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: June 4, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 108)]
[Notices]
[Page 31847-31849]
[DOCID:fr04jn08-40]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings  1

May 9, 2008.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC08-78-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Ohio, Inc.; Cinergy Corp.; Cinergy Power
Investments, Inc.; Generating Facility LLC.
    Description: Amendment to Application and Request for Extended
Notice Period for Comments of Cinergy Corp.
    Filed Date: 05/06/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080506-5107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, May 27, 2008.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:
    Docket Numbers: EG08-71-000.
    Applicants: UniSource Energy Development Company.
    Description: Self Certification Notice of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of UniSource Energy Development Company.
    Filed Date: 05/07/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080507-5020.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, May 28, 2008.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER05-360-003.
    Applicants: Old Dominion Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Old Dominion Electric Cooperative submits an
application in the Compliance Update proposing that certain limited
changes be made to its filed Comprehensive Cost of Service Formula.
    Filed Date: 05/06/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080508-0211.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, May 27, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-375-002.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company's Answer to Protest
and Request for a Hearing of the Public Utilities Commission of the
State of California.
    Filed Date: 05/06/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080506-5126.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, May 27, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-603-002.
    Applicants: Conectiv Delmarva Generation, LLC.
    Description: Conectiv Delmarva Generation, LLC submits Second
Amended Notice of Succession that reflects CDG, LLC's adoption of CDG,
Inc.'s market-based rate schedule, etc.
    Filed Date: 04/30/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080501-0064.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, May 21, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-685-001.
    Applicants: TransCanada Maine Wind Development, Inc.
    Description: TransCanada Maine Wind Development, Inc., submits an
amendment to its Rate Schedule FERC 1.
    Filed Date: 05/06/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080508-0196.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, May 27, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-766-001.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc., submits revised versions
of the unexecuted Network Integration Transmission Service with Kansas
Power Pool.
    Filed Date: 04/30/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080502-0117.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, May 21, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-900-000.
    Applicants: Potomac Edison Company.
    Description: Potomac Edison Co. submits a rate schedule and
supporting cost data with respect to the cost-based revenue requirement
for providing Reactive Support and Voltage Control Generation Sources
Services to PJM, etc.
    Filed Date: 05/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080505-0078.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, May 22, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-901-001.
    Applicants: Saracen Energy Partners, LP.
    Description: Saracen Energy Partners, LP, submits a Supplement to
the Petition for Acceptance of Initial Tariff, Waivers and Blanket
Authority.
    Filed Date: 05/05/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080507-0213.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, May 27, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-909-000.
    Applicants: Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC.
    Description: Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC, submits Second
Revised Sheet 34 of FERC Electric Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume 2, to
become effective 10/9/07.
    Filed Date: 05/02/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080506-0080.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, May 23, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-910-000.
    Applicants: Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC.
    Description: Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC submits Second
Revised Sheet 37-38 of its FERC Electric Tariff, Eleventh Revised
Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 05/02/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080506-0079.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, May 23, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-911-000.
    Applicants: Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc.
    Description: Alliant Energy submits a Wholesale Power Agreement
with Rock Energy Cooperative.
    Filed Date: 05/02/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080506-0078.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, May 23, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-912-000.
    Applicants: Iberdrola Renewables, Inc.
    Description: Iberdrola Renewables, Inc., submits a notice of
succession.
    Filed Date: 05/02/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080506-0077.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, May 23, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-915-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC, submits an executed interim
interconnection service agreement with Hawks Nest Hydro, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 05/05/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080507-0214.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, May 27, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-916-000.
    Applicants: Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc., submits an
amendment to First Revised Rate Schedule 25.
    Filed Date: 05/05/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080507-0215.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, May 27, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-917-000.
    Applicants: Green Light Energy, LLC.
    Description: Green Light Energy, LLC, submits a Petition for
Acceptance of Initial Tariff, Waivers and Blanket Authority.
    Filed Date: 05/05/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080507-0216.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, May 27, 2008.
    Docket Numbers: ER08-918-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits a revision to the
scheduling, procedures and operation of the PJM Interchange Energy
Market at Section 2.3 of Attachment K.
    Filed Date: 05/02/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080507-0217.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, May 23, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-919-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits a revision to the
Reliability Pricing Model at Section 10(l) of Attachment DD.
    Filed Date: 05/02/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080507-0218.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, May 23, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-920-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc. and New England Power.
    Description: ISO New England Inc. et al. submits revised tariff
sheets and

supporting testimony re proposed revisions to Schedule 2--Reactive
Supply and Voltage Control etc.
    Filed Date: 05/02/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080507-0219.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, May 23, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-921-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Pacific Gas and Electric Co. submits revised Appendix
E to the PG&E-SMUD Interconnection Agreement.
    Filed Date: 05/02/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080507-0220.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, May 23, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-923-000.
    Applicants: Xcel Energy Services Inc.
    Description: Southwestern Public Service Company submits certain
revised unexecuted service agreements for Network Integration
Transmission Service under the Xcel Energy Operating Companies Joint
Open Access Transmission Tariff etc.
    Filed Date: 05/06/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080508-0215.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, May 27, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-924-000.
    Applicants: Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc.
    Description: Wisconsin Power and Light Company submits a Wholesale
Power Agreement between Central Wisconsin Electric Cooperative and WPL.
    Filed Date: 05/05/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080508-0209.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, May 27, 2008.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following open access
transmission tariff filings:

    Docket Numbers: OA07-84-001.
    Applicants: NorthWestern Corporation.
    Description: Order No. 890 OATT Filing of NorthWestern Corporation.
    Filed Date: 05/06/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080506-5111.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, May 27, 2008.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-12430 Filed 6-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P