[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 140 (Monday, July 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 40071]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15873]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2021-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2062]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations for Franklin County, Florida
and Incorporated Areas

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing
its proposed notice concerning proposed flood hazard determinations,
which may include the addition or modification of any Base Flood
Elevation, base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area boundary or zone
designation, or regulatory floodway (herein after referred to as
proposed flood hazard determinations) on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps
and, where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study reports
for Franklin County, Florida and Incorporated Areas.

DATES: This withdrawal is effective July 26, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-
2062, to Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal
Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 29, 2020, FEMA published a
proposed notice at 85 FR 68586, proposing flood hazard determinations
for Franklin County, Florida and Incorporated Areas. FEMA is
withdrawing the proposed notice.
    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4.

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-15873 Filed 7-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register: November 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 211)]
[Notices]
[Page 67417-67419]
[DOCID:fr02no10-110]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63186; File No. SR-CBOE-2010-095]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Related to Hybrid 3.0 Classes

October 27, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on October 25, 2010, the Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-
controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is proposing to amend its rules that relate to the
designation of index options and options on exchange-traded funds
(``ETFs'') for trading on CBOE's Hybrid Trading System and Hybrid 3.0
Platform and eligible categories of Market-Maker participants. The text
of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site
(http://www.cboe.org/Legal,) at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary
and at the Commission.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is proposing to amend its rules that relate to the
designation of index options and options on ETFs for trading on the
Hybrid Trading System and Hybrid 3.0 Platform. The ``Hybrid Trading
System'' refers to the Exchange's trading platform that allows Market-
Makers to submit electronic quotes in their appointed classes. The
``Hybrid 3.0 Platform'' is an electronic trading platform on the Hybrid
Trading System that allows one or more quoters to submit electronic
quotes which represent the aggregate Market-Maker quoting interest in
the series for the trading crowd.
    Currently, the particular trading platform on which such an option
contract is traded and the eligible categories of Market-Maker
participants for those options are designated by the Exchange on a
class-by-class basis pursuant to Rule 8.14, Index Hybrid Trading System
Classes: Market-Maker Participants. The Exchange is now proposing to
amend this rule as it relates to classes designated for trading on the
Hybrid 3.0 Platform. Specifically, the Exchange is proposing to provide
that, for each Hybrid 3.0 class, the Exchange may determine to
authorize a group of series of the class for trading on the Hybrid
Trading System and, if that authorization is granted, the Exchange
would determine the eligible categories of Market-Maker participants
for that group of series.\5\ The Exchange would assign a Designated
Primary Market-Maker (``DPM'') or Lead Market-Maker (``LMM'') to the
group of series. Alternatively, the Exchange could determine to
designate the group of series for trading without a DPM or LMM provided
certain conditions set forth in Rule 8.14(b) are satisfied with respect
to the group of series.\6\

    \5\ The Exchange would also have the authority to determine
whether to change the trading platform on which the group of series
trades and change the eligible categories of Market-Maker
participants for the group.
    \6\ Specifically, the group of series could be designated to
trade on the Hybrid Trading System without a DPM or LMM provided the
following conditions, as applicable, are satisfied: (1) There are at
least four (4) Market-Makers quoting in the group of series; (2)
Each Market-Maker with an appointment in the group of series is
subject to the continuous quoting obligations imposed by CBOE Rule
8.7(d); and (3) In the event the Exchange activates request-for-
quote (``RFQ'') functionality (which has not been activated for any
class traded on the Exchange), each Market-Maker would have an
obligation to respond to that percentage of RFQs as determined by
the Exchange for the group of series subject to certain requirements
specified in Rule 8.14(b)3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EXAMPLE (for illustrative purposes only): Currently options on
the Standard & Poor's 500 Index (symbol SPX) are the only class of
options traded on the Hybrid 3.0 Platform. Pursuant to the proposed
rule change, the Exchange could determine to designate all end-of-
week option series in the SPX option class for trading on the Hybrid
Trading System without a DPM or LMM.\7\ All other series of the SPX
option class could continue to be designated for trading on the
Hybrid 3.0 Platform with two rotating LMMs.

    \7\ To the extent that the Exchange would determine to designate
SPX end-of-week series for trading on the Hybrid Trading System
without a DPM or LMM, certain conditions set forth in Rule 8.14(b)
would have to be satisfied, as applicable. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    When selecting series to trade on the Hybrid Trading Platform, the
Exchange intends to generally select series with common expirations or
classifications, e.g., end-of-week series or end-of-month series, short
term option series, or series that expire on a particular expiration
date. The Exchange notes that an individual series would only trade on
one trading platform at a given time, not both. What trading platform
an individual series trades on is controlled by CBOE in how the series
is set up in

CBOEdirect (the trading engine for the Hybrid Trading System and Hybrid
3.0 Platform). Using the example above, CBOE would change the platform
designation for SPX end-of-week series in CBOEdirect to the Hybrid
Trading System and keep the platform designation for all other SPX
series on the Hybrid 3.0 Platform. In addition, the Exchange plans to
introduce a new option symbol to denote the series that are trading on
a different platform. Using the example above, SPX end-of-week series
might trade under symbol SPXW while all other SPX series would continue
to trade under symbol SPX.
    The Exchange notes that CBOE has had several trading platform
changes over the years for entire option classes (e.g., CBOE has moved
certain other option classes from the Hybrid 3.0 Platform to the Hybrid
Trading System). The move of a group of series within a class would
operate similar to the way other option class moves have operated in
the past. In this regard, the Exchange generally provides CBOE Trading
Permit Holders at least one trading day's advance notice of trading
platform changes via regulatory circular. For the initial changeover of
any SPX series that may be traded on the Hybrid Trading System,
however, the Exchange plans to give at least one week advance notice so
that Trading Permit Holders can be made aware that the platform change
would only be for a select group of series and not the whole class, and
so that the Exchange can schedule education sessions to explain the
change to Trading Permit Holders. Once the Exchange has made an initial
changeover, if we would determine to add (or remove) series from the
Hybrid Trading Platform we plan to revert back to the general approach
of providing at least one trading day's advance notice for those
subsequent changes.
    The following would also apply: Market-Maker appointments would
continue to apply on a class basis, except DPM, LMM and Electronic DPM
(``e-DPM'') appointments would apply only to the group of series to
which the respective DPM, LMM or e-DPM is assigned, if applicable. In
addition, the Hybrid Trading System trading parameters (e.g.,
applicable matching algorithm parameters under Rule 6.45B, Priority and
Allocation of Trading in Index Options and Options on ETFs on the CBOE
Hybrid System; opening rotation parameters under Rule 6.2B, Hybrid
Opening System (``HOSS''); automatic execution parameters under Rule
6.13, CBOE Hybrid System's Automatic Execution Feature; Simple Auction
Liaison parameters under Rule 6.13A, Simple Auction Liaison (SAL),\8\
Hybrid Agency Liaison parameters under Rule 6.14A, Hybrid Agency
Liaison 2 (HAL2),\9\ complex order book (``COB'') and complex order
request-for-response auction (``COA'') parameters under Rule 6.53C,
Complex Orders on the Hybrid System, Automated Improvement Mechanism
parameters under Rule 6.74A, Automated Improvement Mechanism
(``AIM''),\10\ etc.) would be established by the Exchange on a group
basis, instead of on a class basis, to the extent the Exchange Rules
otherwise provide for such parameters to be established on a class
basis. Thus, using the example above, CBOE would set the trading
parameters (e.g., parameters for the matching algorithm, HOSS,
automatic execution, SAL, HAL2, COB, COA, AIM, etc.) for the SPX end-
of-week series group that would trade on the Hybrid Trading System
platform, and separately set the trading parameter for all other SPX
series that would remain on the Hybrid 3.0 platform.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ SAL is a feature within the Hybrid System that auctions
marketable orders for price improvement over the National Best Bid
or Offer (``NBBO'').
    \9\ HAL2 is a feature in the Hybrid System that provides
automated order handling in designated classes for qualifying
electronic orders that are not automated executed by the Hybrid
System.
    \10\ AIM is a feature within the Hybrid System that provides
Trading Permit Holders with the ability to electronically execute
agency orders against principal interest or against a solicited
order provided the agency order is submitted for electronic
execution into an auction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange is proposing to amend the text of Rule 8.14
to delete paragraph (b)(4), which is outdated and no longer applicable.
Paragraph (b)(4) contains an outdated provision related to the
Intermarket Options Linkage Plan, which has been replaced by the Plan
for the Purpose of Creating and Operating an Intermarket Option
Linkage.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56761
(November 7, 2007), 72 FR 64094 (November 14, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The basis under the Act for this proposed rule change is the
requirement under Section 6(b)(5) \12\ that an exchange have rules that
are designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism for a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. In particular, the Exchange believes
the proposed change would provide more flexibility to designate trading
platform and Market-Maker categories based on a group of series in a
manner that is consistent with existing CBOE rules that permit such
designations on a class basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposal.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing rule does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, provided that the self-regulatory organization
has given the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or such shorter time as designated
by the Commission, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \13\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\14\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File

Number SR-CBOE-2010-095 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2010-095. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the CBOE. All comments received will
be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE- 2010-095 and should be submitted
on or before November 23, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-27588 Filed 11-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST ( in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51  App. V)

SIP Submitted by: Virginia Date Submitted: August 25, 2005 Subject: Technical Documents Incorporated by Reference in 9 VAC 5 Chapter 20 ( General Provisions), and Cross References to Regulations in 9 VAC 5 Chapter 40, Part II ( Existing Stationary Sources Emission Standards)

Review Completed by: Harold A. Frankford Date Completed: October 7, 2005 Administrative Materials ACCEPTABLE EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL ( X)

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision thereof. 1. Submittal letter was signed August 25, 2005 by Robert G.

Burnley, Director, Department of Environmental Quality, who has been designated to sign SIP Submittal cover letters X 2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order,

consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/ issuance date. 2. Virginia provided proof that on November 7, 2001, the Commonwealth adopted the revisions to 9 Chapter 5 Chapters 20 and 40, effective February 1, 2002. The final version of the Appendices were published in the December 17, 2001 Virginia Register of Regulations. X 3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 3. Revision was adopted and submitted in accordance with the requirements of Section 10.1 1308 of the Virginia Air Pollution Control Law EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL ( X)

2 4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the plan,

including indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/ document signed, stamped,

dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation/ document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. 4. Virginia has submitted a copy of revised Regulations 9 VAC 5 20 21, 5 40 460, 5 40 2930, 5 40 5210, and 5 40 5230.

Virginia also submitted notations clearly specifying that information submitted on additional regulatory revisions were submitted for information purposes only. X 5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/ issuance of the plan. 5. All required documentation provided. Regulation were adopted in accordance with the requirements of section 10.1

1308 of the Virginia Air Pollution Control Law, which in turn cross references the requirements of Virginia's Administrative Process Act ( § 9 6.14: 1 et seq., currently codified at § 2.2 4000 et seq.). X 6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice. 6. Virginia provided notice to the EPA, Maryland, the District of Columbia, Tennessee, and the public that hearings were to be held in Richmond, VA on August 16, 2001. X 7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. Virginia certified that the public hearing was held in Richmond, VA on August 16, 2001, in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR Section 51.102. X Administrative Materials EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL ( X)

3 8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response thereto. 8. In its August 25, 2005 submittal, Virginia provided a statement that no testimony was received on the proposed State action. X Administrative Materials EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL ( X)

4 1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. Not Applicable 2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/ nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area( s). 2. Not Applicable 3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate,

quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result of the revision. 3. Not Applicable 4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. 4. Not Applicable 5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used,

ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used,

justification for use of offsite data ( where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. 5. Not Applicable 6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology. 6. Not Applicable 7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/ reporting requirements,

where necessary, to ensure emission levels. 7. Not Applicable Administrative Materials EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL ( X)

5 8. Compliance/ enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be determined in practice. 8. Not Applicable 9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any applicable EPA policies. ( If a policy is not appropriate,

explain why.) 9. Not Applicable 10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. 10. Not Applicable


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32158-32161]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14752]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-83594; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2018-044]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend BZX Rule 14.11(c), Index Fund
Shares

July 5, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 21, 2018, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``BZX'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposal to amend BZX Rule 14.11(c), Index
Fund Shares, to make clear that a series of Index Fund Shares meets the
quantitative requirements of Rules 14.11(c)(3), (4), and (5) where
either the index or portfolio holdings underlying such fund meets the
quantitative requirements.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
website at www.markets.cboe.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for

the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend BZX Rule 14.11(c), Index Fund
Shares, to make clear that a series of Index Fund Shares meets the
quantitative requirements of Rules 14.11(c)(3), (4), and (5) where
either the index or portfolio holdings underlying such fund meets the
quantitative requirements. More specifically, the Exchange is proposing
to make clear that any instance of the phrase ``index or portfolio'' or
``portfolio or index'' in Rules 14.11(c)(3)(A), 14.11(c)(4)(A) and (B),
and 14.11(c)(5) (collectively, the ``Generic Listing Standards'') shall
be interpreted as referring to the constituents of the underlying index
or the portfolio holdings of the series of Index Fund Shares.
    Practically, this proposal provides that a series of Index Fund
Shares will be deemed to meet the Generic Listing Standards on a
continuous basis where the underlying index meets the Generic Listing
Standards or the fund's portfolio holdings meet the Generic Listing
Standards. The Generic Listing Standards were designed to allow certain
series of Index Fund Shares to be listed on the Exchange that, by
virtue of meeting certain quantitative standards, are deemed as not
being susceptible to manipulation and for which the creation and
redemption process and arbitrage mechanism will operate efficiently.\3\
Historically, Rule 14.11(c) provided that the Generic Listing Standards
did not apply on an ongoing basis and meeting such requirements was
required only prior to the series of Index Fund Shares being listed on
the Exchange. Because such determination occurred prior to listing on
the Exchange, the index constituents constituted the best means for
determining whether a series of Index Fund Shares would be susceptible
to manipulation and whether the creation and redemption process and
arbitrage mechanism would operate efficiently. However, the Exchange
believes that after a series of Index Fund Shares is listed on the
Exchange, both the index constituents and the portfolio holdings are
equally viable for evaluating whether the shares are susceptible to
manipulation and the efficiency of the creation and redemption process
and the arbitrage mechanism.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Series of Index Fund Shares that meet the Generic Listing
Standards and the other applicable provisions of Rule 14.11(c) are
allowed do list on the Exchange pursuant to Rule 19b-4(e). See 17
CFR 240.19b-4(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 1, 2018, the Generic Listing Standards began applying on
both an initial and continuous basis,\4\ but the Adopting Order did not
address the issue of whether the portfolio holdings could satisfy the
Generic Listing Standards and, thus, the underlying index remains the
only basis for determining whether a series of Index Fund Shares meets
the Generic Listing Standards. Looking only to the index constituents
to determine whether a series of Index Fund Shares can continue to be
listed on the Exchange is contrary to the policy goals underlying the
rules for a number of reasons, as further laid out below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 80169 (March 7, 2017),
82 FR 13536 (March 13, 2017) (SR-BatsBZX-2016-80) (order approving
the application of listing standards on a continuous basis) (the
``Adopting Order'') and 81777 (September 29, 2017), 82 FR 46583
(October 5, 2017) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of
proposed rule change to extend implementation to January 1, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    First, the portfolio holdings are at least as accurate of a measure
as the index constituents to evaluate whether a series of Index Fund
Shares are consistent with the policy goals after such fund is already
listed and trading on the Exchange. When determining whether a series
of Index Fund Shares are going to be susceptible to manipulation and
how efficiently the creation and redemption process and the arbitrage
mechanism will operate, the Generic Listing Standards require that the
underlying assets associated with a series of Index Fund Shares are
sufficiently liquid, diverse, unconcentrated, and large. The portfolio
holdings are arguably a better means for making this determination than
the index constituents because the portfolio holdings reflect the
actual assets held by the series of Index Fund Shares while the index
constituents are just the assets that the series is designed to track.
As such, the Exchange is proposing that where either the portfolio
holdings or the index constituents meet the Generic Listing Standards,
the series of Index Fund Shares should be considered to meet the
Generic Listing Standards and be able to continue to be listed on the
Exchange.
    Second, every index is bound by its respective methodology. This
process is intentionally out of the control of the issuers, whose
products are ultimately required to meet the Generic Listing Standards.
While it makes sense to look to the index constituents for compliance
with the Generic Listing Standards on an initial basis, it becomes
problematic on an ongoing basis. Where the index constituents no longer
meet the Generic Listing Standards, the only way that the constituents
can get back into compliance is through natural market movements, an
index rebalance, a change to the index methodology, or a change of
index. It is not feasible for an issuer to rely on natural market
movements to bring a series of Index Fund Shares back into compliance
with the Generic Listing Standards. An index rebalance may bring a
series of Index Fund Shares back into compliance with the Generic
Listing Standards, but it isn't guaranteed (index providers do not
generally consider the Generic Listing Standards in constructing
indexes) and may not occur within the time frame of the cure periods
provided under Rule 14.12 (rebalances generally occur quarterly or
annually). Changes to an index methodology or changing the underlying
index would require significant effort and months of notice, again
putting the timeline for implementation outside of the window for the
cure periods in Rule 14.12. Providing that a series of Index Fund
Shares meets the Generic Listing Standards where the portfolio holdings
meet the Generic Listing Standards will allow issuers with a greater
degree of control over whether their products meet their ongoing
listing obligations. While such portfolio holdings will still need to
meet the requirements under the Investment Company Act of 1940 related
to tracking the underlying index, such flexibility will allow issuers
to continue to meet the Generic Listing Standards even where an
underlying index narrowly fails to meet them. Further, it will provide
issuers with certainty that they will be able to meet the Generic
Listing Standards even where the underlying index may drift out of
compliance for any number of reasons.
    Finally, the generic listing standards applicable to the equity and
index holdings of a series of Managed Fund Shares under Rule 14.11(i)
are nearly identical to the Generic Listing Standards and are designed
to mitigate the same policy concerns, but look only to portfolio
holdings to determine compliance with ongoing listing

obligations.\5\ The only substantive difference between Index Fund
Shares and Managed Fund Shares is that Index Fund Shares are designed
to track the returns of an underlying index and Managed Fund Shares
employ an actively managed portfolio that is designed to accomplish an
investment objective rather than tracking an index. The Commission
determined that such generic listing standards were consistent with the
Act in the Active Generics Approval Order and the Exchange agrees with
that determination and further believes that it would be consistent
with the Act for compliance with the Generic Listing Standards to be
evaluated based on either the series of Index Fund Shares underlying
index constituents or portfolio holdings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78396 (July 22,
2016), 81 FR 49698 (July 28, 2016) (SR-BATS-2015-100).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In sum, the Exchange believes that by allowing a series of Index
Fund Shares to comply with the Generic Listing Standards where either
its portfolio holdings or index constituents meet the Generic Listing
Standards, the proposal would provide issuers with significant
additional regulatory certainty related to a fund's ability to continue
to be listed and traded on the Exchange pursuant to the Rule 19b-4(e),
while simultaneously continuing to accomplish the policy goals
underlying the Generic Listing Standards. The Exchange believes that
this proposal would enhance competition among market participants, to
the benefit of investors and the marketplace. In addition, the proposed
amendments would create greater investor confidence in exchange-traded
products generally because there will be a greater degree of certainty
that Index Fund Shares will not be subject to regulatory action or
delisting.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\6\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ in particular, because it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and
perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest
and because it is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has in place surveillance procedures that are adequate
to properly monitor trading in Shares in all trading sessions and to
deter and detect violations of Exchange rules and applicable federal
securities laws.
    The Exchange believes the proposed amendments, by explicitly
permitting the portfolio holdings to determine compliance with the
Generic Listing Standards, would provide issuers with significant
additional regulatory certainty related to a fund's ability to continue
to be listed and traded on the Exchange pursuant to the Rule 19b-4(e),
while simultaneously continuing to accomplish the policy goals
underlying the Generic Listing Standards, which would enhance
competition among market participants, to the benefit of investors and
the marketplace. In addition, the proposed amendments would create
greater investor confidence in exchange-traded products generally
because there will be a greater degree of certainty that Index Fund
Shares will not be subject to regulatory action or delisting.
    The Exchange believes that looking only to the index constituents
to determine whether a series of Index Fund Shares can continue to be
listed on the Exchange is actually inconsistent with the policy goals
underlying the Generic Listing Standards for a number of reasons, as
further laid out below. First, the portfolio holdings are at least as
accurate of a measure as the index constituents to evaluate whether a
series of Index Fund Shares are consistent with the policy goals after
such fund is already listed and trading on the Exchange. When
determining whether a series of Index Fund Shares are going to be
susceptible to manipulation and how efficiently the creation and
redemption process and the arbitrage mechanism will operate, the
Generic Listing Standards require that the underlying assets associated
with a series of Index Fund Shares are sufficiently liquid, diverse,
unconcentrated, and large. The portfolio holdings are arguably a better
means for making this determination than the index constituents because
the portfolio holdings reflect the actual assets held by the series of
Index Fund Shares while the index constituents are just the assets that
the series is designed to track. As such, the Exchange is proposing
that where either the portfolio holdings or the index constituents meet
the Generic Listing Standards, the series of Index Fund Shares should
be considered to meet the Generic Listing Standards and be able to
continue to be listed on the Exchange.
    Second, indexes are by design slow-moving, relatively inflexible,
and generally out of the control of issuers. While it makes sense to
look to the index constituents for compliance with the Generic Listing
Standards on an initial basis, it becomes problematic on an ongoing
basis. Where the index constituents no longer meet the Generic Listing
Standards, the only way that the constituents can get back into
compliance is through natural market movements, an index rebalance, a
change to the index methodology, or a change of index. It is not
feasible for an issuer to rely on natural market movements to bring a
series of Index Fund Shares back into compliance with the Generic
Listing Standards. An index rebalance may bring a series of Index Fund
Shares back into compliance with the Generic Listing Standards, but it
isn't guaranteed (index providers do not generally consider the Generic
Listing Standards in constructing indexes) and may not occur within the
time frame of the cure periods provided under Rule 14.12 (rebalances
generally occur quarterly or annually). Changes to an index methodology
or changing the underlying index would require significant effort and
months of notice, again putting the timeline for implementation outside
of the window for the cure periods in Rule 14.12. Providing that a
series of Index Fund Shares meets the Generic Listing Standards where
the portfolio holdings meet the Generic Listing Standards will allow
issuers with a greater degree of control over whether their products
meet their ongoing listing obligations. While such portfolio holdings
will still need to meet the requirements under the Investment Company
Act of 1940 related to tracking the underlying index, such flexibility
will allow issuers to continue to meet the Generic Listing Standards
even where an underlying index narrowly fails to meet them. Further, it
will provide issuers with certainty that they will be able to meet the
Generic Listing Standards even where the underlying index may drift out
of compliance for any number of reasons.
    Finally, the generic listing standards applicable to the equity and
index holdings of a series of Managed Fund Shares under Rule 14.11(i)
are nearly identical to the Generic Listing Standards and are designed
to mitigate the same policy concerns, but look only to portfolio
holdings to determine compliance with ongoing listing obligations. The
only substantive

difference between Index Fund Shares and Managed Fund Shares is that
Index Fund Shares are designed to track the returns of an underlying
index and Managed Fund Shares employ an actively managed portfolio that
is designed to accomplish an investment objective rather than tracking
an index. The Commission determined that such generic listing standards
were consistent with the Act in the Active Generics Approval Order and
the Exchange agrees with that determination and further believes that
it would be consistent with the Act for compliance with the Generic
Listing Standards to be evaluated based on either the series of Index
Fund Shares underlying index constituents or portfolio holdings.
    In sum, the Exchange believes that by allowing a series of Index
Fund Shares to comply with the Generic Listing Standards where either
its portfolio holdings or index constituents meet the Generic Listing
Standards, the proposal would provide issuers with significant
additional regulatory certainty related to a fund's ability to continue
to be listed and traded on the Exchange pursuant to the Rule 19b-4(e),
while simultaneously continuing to accomplish the policy goals
underlying the Generic Listing Standards. The Exchange believes that
this proposal would enhance competition among market participants, to
the benefit of investors and the marketplace. In addition, the proposed
amendments would create greater investor confidence in exchange-traded
products generally because there will be a greater degree of certainty
that Index Fund Shares will not be subject to regulatory action or
delisting.
    For the above reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is
consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act.

(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would not
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change
would allow the portfolio holdings for a series of Index Fund Shares to
be used to determine compliance with the Generic Listing Standards in
addition to the index constituents, which would enhance competition
among market participants, to the benefit of investors and the
marketplace.

(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) by order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CboeBZX-2018-044 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2018-044. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2018-044 and should be submitted
on or before August 1, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-14752 Filed 7-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 153 (Thursday, August 8, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48299-48300]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18866]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0433; Airspace Docket No. 12-AAL-5]

Establishment of Class D Airspace; Bryant AAF, Anchorage, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class D airspace at Bryant Army
Airfield (AAF), Anchorage AK. This action provides controlled airspace
to improve the safety and management of aircraft operations at the
airport due to an increase in the complexity, volume, and variety of
aircraft in the immediate vicinity of Bryant AAF.

DATES: Effective date, 0901 UTC, October 17, 2013. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR Part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Roberts, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA, 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On August 22, 2012, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to establish Class D airspace at
Bryant AAF, Anchorage AK (77 FR 50646). Interested parties were invited
to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments
on the proposal to the FAA. Thirteen comments were received.
    The commenters were concerned that the creation of Class D airspace
east of the Glenn Highway might compress traffic using the Eastside VFR
flyway, adversely affect pilots' situational awareness, and questioned
the availability of weather information at Fort Richardson. The FAA
found merit in some of these comments and issued a supplemental notice
of proposed rulemaking to establish Class D airspace at Bryant AAF,
Anchorage, AK, but would eliminate that portion east of Glenn Highway
(FR 78 34608, June 10, 2013). Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on
the proposal to the FAA. Fourteen comments were received, all in
support of the supplemental proposal. Subsequent to publication of the
SNPRM, the FAA found that a digit was left off the first set of
coordinates, and is corrected in the rule.
    Class D airspace designations are published in paragraph 5000 of
FAA Order 7400.9W, dated August 8, 2012, and effective September 15,
2012, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D
airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in this Order.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
Part 71 by establishing Class D airspace extending upward to and
including 2,900 feet MSL at Bryant AAF, Anchorage, AK. This action
provides controlled airspace due to an increase in the complexity,
volume and variety of aircraft in the immediate vicinity of the airport
and improves the safety of and management of aircraft operations. A
typographical error is corrected in the regulatory text for the first
set of coordinates, changing it from ``lat. 61[deg]17''3' '' to ``lat.
61[deg] 17''13' ''.
    The FAA has determined this regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments
are necessary to keep them operationally current. Therefore, this
regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified
this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The FAA's authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code.
Subtitle 1, Section 106 discusses the authority of the FAA
Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency's authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to
ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority as it establishes

controlled airspace at Bryant AAF, Anchorage, AK.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR Part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E. O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9W, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2012, and effective September 15,
2012 is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace

* * * * *

AAL AK D Bryant Army Airfield, Anchorage AK [NEW]

Bryant AAF, AK
    (Lat. 61[deg]15'57'' N., long. 149[deg]39'12'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
2,900 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line beginning at lat.
61[deg]17'13'' N., long. 149[deg]37'35'' W.; to lat. 61[deg]17'13''
N., long. 149[deg]43'08'' W.; to lat. 61[deg]13'49'' N., long.
149[deg]43'08'' W.; to lat. 61[deg]13'54'' N., long. 149[deg]42'44''
W.to lat. 61[deg]14'24'' N., long. 149[deg]41'23'' W.; to lat.
61[deg]15'54'' N., long. 149[deg]38'20'' W.; thence to the point of
beginning.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on July 26, 2013.
Clark Desing,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2013-18866 Filed 8-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: May 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 90)]
[Notices]
[Page 26093-26094]
[DOCID:fr08my08-62]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Project No. 13058-000]

Grays Harbor Ocean Energy Company, LLC; Notice of Application
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Protests

April 30, 2008.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric applications have been
filed with the Commission and are available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Preliminary Permit.
    b. Project No.: P-13058-000.
    c. Date Filed: November 5, 2007.
    d. Applicant: Grays Harbor Ocean Energy Company, LLC.
    e. Name of the Project: Grays Harbor Ocean Energy Project
    f. Location: The project would be located in the Pacific Ocean in
Grays Harbor County, Washington. The project uses no dam or
impoundment.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. W. Burton Hamner, President, Grays Harbor
Ocean Energy Company, LLC, 5534 30th Avenue, NE., Seattle, WA 98105,
206/491-0945.
    i. FERC Contact: Patricia W. Gillis,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    j. Deadline for filing comments, protests, and motions to
intervene: 60 days from the issuance date of this notice.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Comments, protests, and
interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of
paper; see 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the
Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission
strongly encourages electronic filings. Please include the project
number (P-13058-000) on any comments or motions filed.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on

each person in the official service list for the project. Further, if
an intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating
to the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency.
    k. Description of Project: The proposed project would consist of:
(1) 12 proposed generating units having a total installed capacity of
6-megawatts; (2) a proposed transmission line; and (4) appurtenant
facilities. The project would have an average annual generation of 316-
gigawatt-hours and be sold to a local utility.
    l. Location of Application: A copy of the application is available
for inspection and reproduction at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is
also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item h
above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Competing Preliminary Permit--Anyone desiring to file a
competing application for preliminary permit for a proposed project
must submit the competing application itself, or a notice of intent to
file such an application, to the Commission on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application (see 18 CFR 4.36).
Submission of a timely notice of intent allows an interested person to
file the competing preliminary permit application no later than 30 days
after the specified comment date for the particular application. A
competing preliminary permit application must conform with 18 CFR 4.30
and 4.36.
    o. Competing Development Application--Any qualified development
applicant desiring to file a competing development application must
submit to the Commission, on or before a specified comment date for the
particular application, either a competing development application or a
notice of intent to file such an application. Submission of a timely
notice of intent to file a development application allows an interested
person to file the competing application no later than 120 days after
the specified comment date for the particular application. A competing
license application must conform with 18 CFR 4.30 and 4.36.
    p. Notice of Intent--A notice of intent must specify the exact
name, business address, and telephone number of the prospective
applicant, and must include an unequivocal statement of intent to
submit, if such an application may be filed, either a preliminary
permit application or a development application (specify which type of
application). A notice of intent must be served on the applicant(s)
named in this public notice.
    q. Proposed Scope of Studies Under Permit--A preliminary permit, if
issued, does not authorize construction. The term of the proposed
preliminary permit would be 36 months. The work proposed under the
preliminary permit would include economic analysis, preparation of
preliminary engineering plans, and a study of environmental impacts.
Based on the results of these studies, the Applicant would decide
whether to proceed with the preparation of a development application to
construct and operate the project.
    r. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene--Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov
under the ``e-Filing'' link.
    s. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents--Any filings must
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``NOTICE OF INTENT
TO FILE COMPETING APPLICATION'', ``COMPETING APPLICATION'',
``PROTEST'', and ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as applicable, and the
Project Number of the particular application to which the filing
refers. Any of the above-named documents must be filed by providing the
original and the number of copies provided by the Commission's
regulations to: The Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. An additional copy must be
sent to Director, Division of Hydropower Administration and Compliance,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, at the above-mentioned address. A
copy of any notice of intent, competing application or motion to
intervene must also be served upon each representative of the Applicant
specified in the particular application.
    t. Agency Comments--Federal, State, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-10169 Filed 5-7-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 77 (Thursday, April 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23860-23861]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08502]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OMS-2022-0277; 9780-01-OMS]

Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request;
Ethnicity, Race, Gender and Disability Self-Identification Form for
Nominees Considered for Appointment on Federal Advisory Committees at
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to
submit an information collection request (ICR), Ethnicity, Race, Gender
and Disability Self-Identification Form for nominees considered for
appointment on federal advisory committees at the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA ICR Number 2717.01, OMB Control Number 2030-NEW)
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. Before doing so, EPA is
soliciting public comments on specific aspects of the proposed
information collection as described below. This is a request for
approval of a new collection. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and
a person is not required to respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 21, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OMS-2022-0277; online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method),
by email to [email protected] or by mail to: EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gina Moore, Office of Resources and
Business Operations, 3101A, Federal Advisory Committee Management
Division, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice initiating a 60-day public comment
period for this action was published on March 2, 2022 (87 FR 11704).
This notice extends the public comment period to allow for a 60-day
comment period on supplemental documents that have been added to the
docket since the Federal Register notice published on March 2, 2022.
These supporting documents, which explain in detail the information
that the EPA will be collecting, are available in the public docket for
this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at www.regulations.gov or in
person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The telephone number for the Docket Center is
202-566-1744. For additional information about EPA's public docket,
visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA is soliciting
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of
the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. EPA
will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as appropriate.
The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for review and
approval. At that time, EPA will issue another Federal Register notice
to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to
submit additional comments to OMB.
    Abstract: Agency officials developed the ``Ethnicity, Race, Gender
and Disability Self-Identification Form'' to comply with Executive
Order (14035): Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility in the
Federal Workforce, Section 5(e) that directs the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency to collect and analyze voluntarily self-reported
demographic data regarding the membership of federal advisory

committees to pursue opportunities to increase diversity, equity,
inclusion, and accessibility. This information collection request will
assist EPA when selecting members to EPA's scientific and technical
federal advisory committees to ensure that members and future nominees
reflect the diversity of the American people in terms of gender, race,
ethnicity, geography, and other characteristics.
    Form Number: EPA 5800-068.
    Respondents/affected entities: Entities potentially affected by
this action are approximately 200 candidates for membership on EPA's
federal advisory committees. In an effort to ensure future nominees
reflect the diversity of America, all nominees are encouraged to
complete and submit EPA Form 5800-068 when applying for membership in
accordance with Executive Order 14035 of June 25, 2021: Diversity,
Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Federal Workforce.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Voluntary.
    Estimated number of respondents: 200 (total).
    Frequency of response: Annually.
    Total estimated burden: 16.6 hours (per year). Burden is defined at
5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $0.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden because this is
a new information collection request.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-08502 Filed 4-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35753-35754]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12671]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG22-136-000.
    Applicants: Maple Flats Solar Energy Center LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Maple Flats Solar Energy Center LLC.
    Filed Date: 6/7/22.
    Accession Number: 20220607-5047.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/28/22.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1840-005; ER16-634-001.
    Applicants: AltaGas Pomona Energy Inc., Blythe Energy, LLC.
    Description: Triennial Market Power Analysis for Southwest Region
of Blythe Energy Inc., et al.
    Filed Date: 6/6/22.
    Accession Number: 20220606-5288.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/5/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-1278-001.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2022-06-07 Compliance Filing--RSEE
to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 6/7/22.
    Accession Number: 20220607-5118.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/28/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-1518-000.
    Applicants: Laurel Mountain BESS, LLC.
    Description: Supplement to March 31, 2022 Laurel Mountain BESS, LLC
tariff filing.
    Filed Date: 6/6/22.
    Accession Number: 20220606-5279.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/16/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2033-001.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Correction to ISA, Service Agreement
No. 5861; Queue Nos. AF2-305/AG1-398 to be effective 5/13/2022.
    Filed Date: 6/7/22.
    Accession Number: 20220607-5113.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/28/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2042-000.
    Applicants: Jackpot Holdings, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Jackpot Holdings, LLC--MBR
Application to be effective 8/6/2022.
    Filed Date: 6/6/22.
    Accession Number: 20220606-5216.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/27/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2043-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original ISA, Service
Agreement No. 6480; Queue No. AC2-154/AD2-060 to be effective 5/9/2022.
    Filed Date: 6/6/22.
    Accession Number: 20220606-5218.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/27/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2044-000.
    Applicants: Just Energy Limited.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Just Energy Limited Market-
Based Rate Application to be effective 7/6/2022.
    Filed Date: 6/6/22.
    Accession Number: 20220606-5237.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/27/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2045-000.
    Applicants: New York State Electric & Gas Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: NYSEG-NYPA Attachment C--O&M
Annual Update to be effective 9/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 6/7/22.
    Accession Number: 20220607-5056.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/28/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2046-000.
    Applicants: Sapphire Sky Wind Energy LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for Market-Based
Rate Authorization to be effective 8/7/2022.
    Filed Date: 6/7/22.
    Accession Number: 20220607-5060.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/28/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2047-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., Ameren
Illinois Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Midcontinent Independent
System Operator, Inc. submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: 2022-
06-07_SA 3299 Att A_Ameren IL-Norris Electric-Russellville Proj. No. 6
to be effective 8/7/2022.
    Filed Date: 6/7/22.
    Accession Number: 20220607-5073.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/28/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2048-000.
    Applicants: Skipjack Solar Center, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Reactive Supply and Voltage
Control Baseline to be effective 6/8/2022.
    Filed Date: 6/7/22.
    Accession Number: 20220607-5079.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/28/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2049-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of Colorado.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2022-06-07 PSC-HLYCRS-Const
Agrmt-Rifle-668-0.0.0 to be effective 6/8/2022.
    Filed Date: 6/7/22.
    Accession Number: 20220607-5117.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/28/22.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: June 7, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-12671 Filed 6-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 11208]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05120]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-0793]

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., and Sun Pharma Global FZE;
Withdrawal of Approval of Four Abbreviated New Drug Applications

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is withdrawing approval
of four abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) from two applicants.
The holders of the applications notified the Agency in writing that the
drug products were no longer marketed and requested that the approval
of the applications be withdrawn.

DATES: Approval is withdrawn as of April 13, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trang Tran, Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
Bldg. 75, Rm. 1671, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The holders of the applications listed in
the table have informed FDA that these drug products are no longer
marketed and have requested that FDA withdraw approval of the
applications under the process in Sec.  314.150(c) (21 CFR 314.150(c)).
The applicants have also, by their requests, waived their opportunity
for a hearing. Withdrawal of approval of an application or abbreviated
application under Sec.  314.150(c) is without prejudice to refiling.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Application No.                 Drug               Applicant
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANDA 075556..................  Enalapril Maleate     Sun Pharmaceutical
                                Tablets USP, 2.5      Industries, Ltd.,
                                milligrams (mg), 5    c/o Sun
                                mg, 10 mg, and 20     Pharmaceutical
                                mg.                   Industries, Inc.,
                                                      2 Independence
                                                      Way, Princeton, NJ
                                                      08540.
ANDA 076045..................  Lorazepam Tablets     Do.
                                USP, 0.5 mg, 1 mg,
                                and 2 mg.
ANDA 078055..................  Zolpidem Tartrate     Do.
                                Tablets USP, 5 mg
                                and 10 mg.
ANDA 090018..................  Zoledronic Acid for   Sun Pharma Global
                                Injection,            FZE, c/o Sun
                                Equivalent to 4 mg    Pharmaceutical
                                base/vial.            Industries, Inc.,
                                                      2 Independence
                                                      Way, Princeton, NJ
                                                      08540.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, approval of the applications listed in the table, and
all amendments and supplements thereto, is hereby withdrawn as of April
13, 2018. Introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of products without approved new drug applications violates
section 301(a) and (d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21
U.S.C. 331(a) and (d)). Drug products that are listed in the table that
are in inventory on April 13, 2018 may continue to be dispensed until
the inventories have been depleted or the drug products have reached
their expiration dates or otherwise become violative, whichever occurs
first.

    Dated: March 8, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-05120 Filed 3-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13176-13177]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5492]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG11-63-000
    Applicants: Macho Springs Power I, LLC
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Macho Springs Power I, LLC.
    Filed Date: 03/02/2011
    Accession Number: 20110302-5152
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2128-003
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corporation
submits tariff filing per 35: 2011-03-02 CAISO's Convergence Bidding
Compliance Filing to be effective 2/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/02/2011
    Accession Number: 20110302-5205
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2288-001
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
35: Compliance filing per Order in Docket No. ER11-2288 to be effective
2/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/02/2011
    Accession Number: 20110302-5194
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3004-000
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company
    Description: Pacific Gas and Electric Company submits tariff filing
per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: Amendment to Wholesale Distribution Tariff:
Generator Interconnection Procedures to be effective 3/3/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/02/2011
    Accession Number: 20110302-5175
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3005-000
    Applicants: NV Energy, Inc.
    Description: NV Energy, Inc. submits tariff filing per 35: OATT
Order 729, 729-A, 729-B Compliance--Attachment C to be effective 4/1/
2011.
    Filed Date: 03/02/2011
    Accession Number: 20110302-5177
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3006-000
    Applicants: NV Energy, Inc.
    Description: NV Energy, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: Service Agreement No. 10-01257 Amendment 1 SGIA to be
effective 2/14/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/02/2011
    Accession Number: 20110302-5178
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3007-000
    Applicants: NV Energy, Inc.
    Description: NV Energy, Inc. submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Service Agreement No. 11-00018 to be effective 2/14/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/02/2011
    Accession Number: 20110302-5179
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3008-000
    Applicants: LG&E Energy Marketing Inc.
    Description: LG&E Energy Marketing Inc. submits tariff filing per
35: Tariff Rev to Remove Certain MBR Restrictions to be effective 5/1/
2011.
    Filed Date: 03/03/2011
    Accession Number: 20110303-5003
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, March 24, 2011

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3009-000
    Applicants: Louisville Gas and Electric Company
    Description: Louisville Gas and Electric Company submits tariff
filing per 35: Tariff Rev to Remove Certain MBR Restrictions to be
effective 5/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 03/03/2011
    Accession Number: 20110303-5007
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, March 24, 2011

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    As it relates to any qualifying facility filings, the notices of
self-certification [or self-recertification] listed above, do not
institute a proceeding regarding qualifying facility status. A notice
of self-certification [or self-recertification] simply provides
notification that the entity making the filing has determined the
facility named in the notice meets the applicable criteria to be a
qualifying facility. Intervention and/or protest do not lie in dockets
that are qualifying facility self-certifications or self-
recertifications. Any person seeking to challenge such qualifying
facility status may do so by filing a motion pursuant to 18 CFR
292.207(d)(iii). Intervention and protests may be filed in response to
notices of qualifying facility dockets other than self-certifications
and self-recertifications.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please

e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free).
For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 3, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-5492 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P