[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 61 (Friday, March 29, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 11968]
[FR Doc No: 2019-06123]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER19-1393-000]

Endeavor Wind I, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Endeavor Wind I, LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is April 11, 2019.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
[email protected]. or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 22, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-06123 Filed 3-28-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


IMPORTANT NOTE TO USER:

The margins and lines are NOT block protected, so you must fill the form with caution, paying attention to any shifting of the existing text. The following tips should make this a simple task:

 Fill in the spaces by using the type over command. Otherwise you'll have to delete a space for each letter you add.

 Use the same font ( Times New Roman 8pt).

 Do not change table lines ( although you can delete an extra space line to provide more space elsewhere.

 It is not recommended that you convert this form to WP5.1, some of these features are not available in WP5.1, so the text will scramble.

If you have any problems or questions, please call your OEI Desk Officer. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request U. S. EPA/ Office of Water/ OGWDW 2. OMB control number b. X None a__ __ __ __  __ __ __ __ 2040 3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. X New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c. G Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a. X Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes X No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a. X Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: / /___

7. Title: National Primary Drinking Water Regulation; Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule ( Proposed Rule)

8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) 2097.01 9. Keywords Drinking Water; Microbial; Pathogens; large systems; small systems, Cryptosporidium, E. Coli, Giardia, LT2ESWTR, Regulations, Stage 2, Disinfection, Byproducts, Protozoan, public water systems, surface water, GWUDI 10. Abstract This ICR will collect information from public drinking water systems using surface water or ground water under the influence of surface water as a source. The LT2ESWTR is based on the results of source water Cryptosporidium monitoring. This ICR will collecte monitoring results from water systems on Cryptosporidium. The LT2ESWTR will significantly improve the control of microbiological pathogens, specifically Cryptosporidium, in public drinking water systems with the highest risk levels. This will substantially lower rates of endemic cryptosporidiosis, the gastrointestinal illness caused by ingestion of Cryptosporidium, which can be severe and sometimes fatal in sensitive subpopulations ( e. g., infants, AIDS patients, the elderly).

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. Farms b. Business or other for profit e. Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. P State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. G Voluntary b. P Required to obtain or retain benefits c. X Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 2,522 b. Total annual responses 98,657 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 0 % c. Total hours requested 1 d. Current OMB inventory 0 e. Difference 1 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 1 2. Adjustment 0 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars)

a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs 0 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) 1 c. Total annualized cost requested 0 d. Current OMB inventory 0 e. Difference f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change 1 2. Adjustment 0 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ Application for benefits e. X Program planning or management b. __ Program evaluation f. __ Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. P Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. X Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c. X Reporting 1. Q On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. X Monthly 4. Q Quarterly 5. Q Semi annually 6. Q Annually 7. Q Biannually 8. X Other ( describe) biweekly 17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes X No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Kristy Stevenson Phone: ( 202) 564 4643 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, 1 certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with' 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3): ( I) Why the information is being collected' ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( I) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Official Ephraim King, Director Standards and Risk Reduction Division Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Oscar Morales, Director Collection Strategies Division Office of Environmental Information Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95 Certification Requirement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions 5 CFR 1320.9 reads " As part of the agency submission to OMB of a proposed collection of information, the agency ( through the head of the agency, the Senior Official or their designee) shall certify ( and provide a record supporting such certification) that the proposed collection of information

"( a) is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including that the information to be collected will have practical utility;

"( b) is not unnecessarily duplicative of information otherwise reasonably accessible to the agency;

"( c) reduces to the extent practicable and appropriate the burden on persons who shall provide information to or for the agency, including with respect to small entities, as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U. S. C § 601( 6)), the use of such techniques as:

"( 1) establishing differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to those who are to respond; "( 2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting requirements; or collection of information , or any part thereof; "( 3) an exemption from coverage of the collection of information, or any part thereof;

"( d) is written using plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology and is understandable to those who are to respond;

"( e) is to be implemented in ways consistent and compatible, to the maximum extent practicable, with the existing reporting and recordkeeping practices of those who are to respond;

"( f) indicates for each recordkeeping requirement the length of time persons are required to maintain the records specified;

"( g) informs potential respondents of the information called for under § 1320.8( b)( 3); [ see below]

"( h) has been developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected, including the processing of the information in a manner which shall enhance, where appropriate, the utility of the information to agencies and the public;

"( I) uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology appropriate to the purpose for which the information is to be collected; and "( j) to the maximum extent practicable, uses appropriate information technology to reduce burden and improve data quality, agency efficiency and responsiveness to the public."

NOTE: 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3) requires that each collection of information:

"( 3) informs and provides reasonable notice to the potential persons to whom the collection of information is addressed of: "( I) the reasons the information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( ii) the way such information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( iii) an estimate, to the extent practicable, of the average burden of the collection ( together with a request that the public direct to the agency any comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden); "( iv) whether responses to the collection of information are voluntary, required to obtain or retain a benefit ( citing authority), or mandatory ( citing authority); "( v) the nature and extent of confidentiality to be provided, if any ( citing authority); and "( vi) the fact that any agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number."

OMB 83 I ( Instructions) 10/ 95


Page 1 of 3 Summary of the Copper Pesticides Risk Assessments and Information Needs Phase 3 of 4 Phase Process; January 23, 2006 Background The preliminary human health and ecological risk assessments for the copper containing pesticides include: the copper II compounds, copper sulfates, copper and oxides, copper salts, and other unscheduled coppers. Copper based pesticides are used as fungicides, bactericides, algaecides, aquatic herbicides, anti foulants, and wood preservatives. They are applied to a wide variety of agricultural, commercial, and residential use sites, and can be formulated as dusts, wettable powders, liquids ( including ready to use liquids), dry flowables, water soluble packets, and granulars.

Human Health Risks Since copper ( Cu) is a naturally occurring metal that is efficiently regulated in the human system, and since there is a lack of systemic toxicity associated with copper exposure, no toxicological endpoints were identified for human health risk assessment purposes; therefore, the human health risk assessment was conducted qualitatively. However, toxicological endpoints were identified for ecological assessment purposes, and a quantitative environmental fate and effects assessment was conducted.

Ecological Risks In the ecological assessment, the Agency evaluated various copper containing products on the basis of ionic copper ( Cu2+), regardless of the original copper species. Copper is highly reactive, especially in the aquatic environment, and may exist in a number of ionic states, ionpairs and organic complexes simultaneously ( known as " speciation"), as well as sorbed to suspended particles. Thus, the total dissolved concentration is not truly reflective of potential copper toxicity. To account for copper speciation in aquatic environments, the Agency used the Biotic Ligand Model ( BLM) in conjunction with the Pesticide Root Zone Model ( PRZM)/ EXposure Analysis Modeling System ( EXAMS) model. The BLM, which was reviewed and approved by the Scientific Advisory Board ( SAB), was developed and used by the EPA's Office of Water to establish Draft Ambient Water Quality Criteria for copper and was used for the aquatic toxicity assessment. For the terrestrial assessment, the Agency's standard methodologies were utilized, including the use of the Terrestrial Exposure Model ( TREX) for evaluation of potential toxic effects to birds and mammals, and TerrPlant for terrestrial plants.

The coppers ecological exposure assessment considers the highest label use rates, in accordance with the Agency's standard assessment protocol. Current labels indicate a wide range of maximum use rates ( 1 to 32 lbs Cu/ acre), with the highest rates generally used on orchard crops. Many current labels of copper products do not have complete or consistent use application information; the labels are often unclear regarding the frequency of application and total number of applications permitted on a yearly basis; thus, the Agency made various assumptions in the risk assessment regarding copper product applications. This limited the Page 2 of 3 Agency's ability to assess actual total copper loading on a treated site. The difficulty of discerning actual use patterns adds uncertainty to the ecological risk assessment. Using the highest labeled use rates, the ecological risk assessment indicates that the copper based pesticide products may pose risk concerns for all taxa evaluated, except for terrestrial plants. Aquatic organisms are especially sensitive to copper concentrations. In order to assess what terrestrial use application rates would pose an ecological risk below the Agency's level of concern ( LOC), the Agency analyzed a wide range of use scenarios and found that at an application rate of approximately 2 lb Cu/ acre, less than 5% of the sites exceeded the acute LOC for aquatic invertebrates. At an application rate of approximately 20 lb Cu/ acre, approximately 50% of the sites exceeded the acute LOC for aquatic invertebrates.

Information Needs In order to address the areas of uncertainty in the ecological risk assessment stemming from incomplete use information, the Agency is requesting actual use pattern information from the public to help refine the risk assessment. Specifically, the Agency is seeking current use rates for copper products used on conventional crops and for direct water treatments, timing and locations of applications, and application equipment used. Please see the attached table, which can be used to submit this information to the Agency.

In addition to seeking public comment on use information, the Agency is also seeking information on alternative pest control measures and mitigation proposals for risk estimates of concern identified in the Agency's ecological risk assessment. Page 3 of 3 COPPERS USE INFORMATION NEEDS Phase 3 of 4 Phase Process, January 2006 REMIT YOUR REPONSE THROUGH THE PUBLIC DOCKET AT www. regulations. gov OR USE ONE OF THE METHODS AS OUTLINED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE. The Agency is seeking typical use information of copper pesticides to agricultural and other conventional sites, as detailed in the template below.

Information to Include:

 Contact Information ( establishment name, contact person, address, best contact method via email or phone)

 Notes of any special or atypical situations where different use rates or other application parameters were used.

A. Use Site1 B. Typical Use Rate ( lbs a. i./ A) C. Maximum Use Rate ( lbs a. i./ A) D. No. of Apps.

per Growing Season* E. Application Interval ( days) F. Timing of Applications G. Application Method H. Target pest( s) I. Comments 1 AQUATIC USE SITES: please specify type of water body ( drinking water reservoir, irrigation system, fish pond), and method of application ( pulse treatment for a given area; boat drawn burlap bag treatment; etc.)

A. Use Site   The crop or type of area ( e. g. apples, farm pond, tomato, etc.) pesticide is applied on.

B. Typical Use Rate ( lbs a. i./ A)   The typical use rate applied to each crop expressed in pounds of active ingredient applied per acre.

C. Maximum Use Rate ( lbs a. i./ A)   The maximum or highest use rate applied to each crop expressed in pounds of applied product per acre.

D. No. of Apps. per Growing Season*   The total number of applications that are applied per growing season. * If multiple growing seasons occur within the same calendar year, please indicate how many growing seasons within one ( 1) calendar year.

E. Application Interval ( days)   The typical number of days between applications.

F. Timing of Applications   month of year, crop phenology stage, etc.

G. Application Method   type of equipment used to apply product, i. e. aerial application, sprayer, ground boom, etc.

H. Target Pest( s)   Specify the target pest( s) to be managed by the product.

I. Comments   Include any details or unique information to highlight about this type of pesticide application.


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 131 (Friday, July 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 44608]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16310]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9027-9]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General
Information<PHONE_NUMBER> or http://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
Filed 06/27/2016 Through 07/01/2016
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20160148, Final, USACE, NC, Figure Eight Island Shoreline
Management Project, Review Period Ends: 08/08/2016, Contact: Mickey
Sugg<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20160149, Final, BIA, FL, Seminole Tribe of Florida Fee to
Trust, Review Period Ends: 08/08/2016, Contact: Chester McGhee 615-564-
6830.
EIS No. 20160150, Final Supplement, NIGC, CA, Jamul Indian Village,
Review Period Ends: 08/08/2016, Contact: Andrew Mendoza<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20160151, Final, BLM, CO, Bull Mountain Unit Master Development
Plan, Review Period Ends: 08/08/2016, Contact: Gina Jones<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20160152, Draft, USFS, NM, Santa Fe National Forest Geothermal
Leasing, Comment Period Ends: 08/22/2016, Contact: Larry Gore 575-289-
3264.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20160128, Final, USACE, NC, Morehead City Harbor Integrated
Dredged Material Management Plan, Review Period Ends: 08/11/2016,
Contact: Jennifer Owens<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Revision to FR Notice Published 06/10/2016; Extending Review Period
from 07/11/2016 to 08/11/2016.

    Dated: July 1, 2016.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2016-16310 Filed 7-7-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 35296]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15854]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

Extension:
    Rule 17f-1(b), SEC File No. 270-028, OMB Control No. 3235-0032

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing
collection of information provided for in Rule 17f-1(b) (17 CFR
240.17f-1(b)), under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a
et seq.). The Commission plans to submit this existing collection of
information to the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') for
extension and approval.
    Under Rule 17f-1(b) under the Exchange Act, approximately 10,000
entities in the securities industry are registered in the Lost and
Stolen Securities Program (``Program''). Registration fulfills a
statutory requirement that entities report and inquire about missing,
lost, counterfeit, or stolen securities. Registration also allows
entities in the securities industry to gain access to a confidential
database that stores information for the Program.
    The Commission staff estimates that 10 new entities will register
in the Program each year. The staff estimates that the average number
of hours necessary to comply with Rule 17f-1(b) is one-half hour.
Accordingly, the staff estimates that total annual burden for all
participants is 5 hours (10 x one-half hour). The Commission staff
estimates that compliance staff work at subject entities results in an
internal cost of compliance, at an estimated hourly wage of $283, of
$141.50 per year per entity (.5 hours x $283 per hour = $141.50 per
year). Therefore, the aggregate annual internal cost of compliance is
approximately $1,415 ($141.50 x 10= $1,415).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    Please direct your written comments to: Pamela Dyson, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o
Candace Kenner, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or send an email
to: [email protected].

    Dated: July 19, 2018.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-15854 Filed 7-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 10, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40541-40544]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16788]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2012-0518]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Water Main Crossing; Choctawhatchee Bay; Santa Rosa
Beach, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
for a portion of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway in Choctawhatchee Bay,
Santa Rosa Beach, FL. This action is necessary for the protection of
persons and vessels, on navigable waters, during the construction of a
subaqueous water main. Entry into or transiting in this zone, during
daylight hours, will be prohibited to all vessels, mariners, and
persons unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port
Mobile or a designated representative.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before August 9, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2012-0518 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries accepted
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed

rule, call or email LT Lenell J. Carson, Coast Guard Sector Mobile,
Waterways Management Division; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
GICW Gulf Intracoastal Waterway
COTP Captain of the Port
LLNR Light List Number

A. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

1. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
proposed rulemaking (USCG-2012-0518), indicate the specific section of
this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for
each suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and
material online at http://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered received by the Coast Guard when
you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be considered as having been received by the
Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name and a mailing address, an email
address, or a telephone number in the body of your document so that we
can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2012-0518) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the proposed
rule based on your comments.

2. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2012-0518) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.

3. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

4. Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this proposed rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.

B. Basis and Purpose

    A 36'' subaqueous water main is being constructed across the
Choctawhatchee Bay to improve water system delivery. The water main
will cross the GICW, a federally maintained navigable channel.
Construction of the water main and the required use of turbidity silt
curtains pose significant safety hazards to both vessels and mariners
operating in or near the GICW. The COTP Mobile proposes to establish a
temporary safety zone for a portion of GICW in Choctawhatchee Bay,
Santa Rosa Beach, FL. This proposed temporary safety zone is deemed
necessary to protect persons and vessels during construction of the
water main across the GICW. The legal basis and authorities for this
proposed rule are found in 33 U.S.C. 1231, 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize the Coast Guard to
propose, establish, and define regulatory safety zones.
    The COTP anticipates some impact on vessel traffic due to this
proposed regulation. However, the proposed temporary safety zone is
deemed necessary for the protection of life and property within the
COTP Mobile zone.

C. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone for a
portion of the GICW in Choctawhatchee Bay from the Highway 331 fixed
bridge west to the Red Nun Buoy ``26'' (LLNR 31510), to include the
entire width of the channel. This proposed rule will protect the safety
of life and property in this area. Entry into or transiting in this
zone, during daylight hours, will be prohibited to all vessels,
mariners, and persons unless specifically authorized by the COTP Mobile
or a designated representative. The COTP may be contacted by telephone
at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    The proposed safety zone will be effective for the months of August
and September 2012. The COTP Mobile anticipates that this proposed rule
will be enforced during daylight hours for approximately seven (7) days
sometime between August and September 2012. If the final dates are
determined, dates and times will be published in the temporary final
rule. The Coast Guard will issue broadcast notice to mariners and local
notice to mariners of the exact dates of enforcement of the regulation.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and

Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
    The temporary safety zone listed in this proposed rule will only
restrict vessel traffic from entering or transiting a small portion of
the GICW during daylight hours. The effect of this regulation will not
be significant for several reasons: (1) The COTP Mobile will issue
maritime advisories widely available to users of the waterway; (2) this
proposed rule will only affect vessel traffic during daylight hours and
that are subject to transiting the GICW due to draft restrictions; and
(3) the impacts on routine navigation are expected to be minimal.
Notifications to the marine community will be made through Local Notice
to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners. These notifications will
allow the public to plan operations around the affected area.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This proposed rule will affect the following entities,
some of which may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit the affected portion of the GICW during
construction of the water main. This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. This safety zone is limited in size, is of
short duration and shallow draft vessel traffic may pass safely around
the temporary safety zone.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this proposed rule would economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this proposed
rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this proposed
rule elsewhere in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference With Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
may disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use because it is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and
is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a
significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement
of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.

13. Technical Standards

    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves safety for the public and is not expected to result in any
significant adverse environmental impact as described in NEPA. This
rule is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure

2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

    1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Public Law
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.

    2. Add Sec.  165.T08-0518 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T08-0518  Safety Zone; Choctawhatchee Bay; Santa Rosa Beach,
FL.

    (a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: a
portion of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway in Choctawhatchee Bay from
the Highway 331 fixed bridge west to the Red Nun Buoy ``26'' (LLNR
31510), to include the entire width of the channel.
    (b) Effective dates. This regulation is effective from August 1,
2012 to September 30, 2012. The Coast Guard will issue broadcast notice
to mariners and local notice to mariners of the exact dates of
enforcement of the regulation.
    (c) Regulations.
    (1) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec.  165.23 of
this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Mobile or a designated representative.
    (2) Persons or vessels not restricted to navigation in the Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway by draft and that can safely do so, may pass
around the zone while maintaining a safe distance and transiting at
slowest safe navigational speed.
    (d) Informational Broadcasts. The Captain of the Port or a
designated representative will inform the public through broadcast
notices to mariners of the enforcement period for the safety zone as
well as any changes in the planned schedule.

    Dated: June 8, 2012.
D.J. Rose,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Mobile.
[FR Doc. 2012-16788 Filed 7-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


                                                        Billing Code: 6560-50-P
                        ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                40 CFR Part 62
                 [EPA-R08-OAR-2017-0171; FRL-9965-11-Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming; Negative Declarations; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is correcting a direct final rule that appeared in the Federal Register on June 5, 2017. The document approved a total of 20 negative declarations from all EPA Region 8 states declaring an absence of existing designated facilities, of certain incinerator classes, regulated under one of the Emissions Guidelines for solid waste incineration units. An approved and promulgated negative declaration exempts a state from certain implementation plan development requirements of Clean Air Act sections 111 and 129. An error in the proposed regulatory text amending 40 CFR part 62 is identified and corrected in this action.
DATES: This rule is effective on August 4, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Lohrke, Air Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2017-11576 appearing on page 25734 in the Federal Register of Monday, June 5, 2017, the following correction is made:
§62.12620 [Corrected]
 On page 25738, in the third column, in §62.12620, in the sole paragraph under this section, in the sixth line, reference to "Utah" is corrected to read "Wyoming."

Dated:  -  - __July 14, 2017.__			____//signed//____
						Debra H. Thomas,
						Acting Regional Administrator,
						Region 8.


[Federal Register: December 8, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 236)]
[Notices]
[Page 71151]
[DOCID:fr08de06-69]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-2641-000]

High Desert Power Project, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

November 30, 2006.
    High Desert Power Project, LLC (High Desert) filed an application
for market-based rate authority, with an accompanying rate tariff. The
proposed market-based rate tariff provides for the sale of energy,
capacity and certain ancillary services at market-based rates. High
Desert also requested waivers of various Commission regulations. In
particular, High Desert requested that the Commission grant blanket
approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all future issuances of securities and
assumptions of liability by High Desert.
    On September 18, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the
Director, Division of Tariffs and Rates--West, granted the requests for
blanket approval under part 34. The Director's order also stated that
the Commission would publish a separate notice in the Federal Register
establishing a period of time for the filing of protests. Accordingly,
any person desiring to be heard or to protest the blanket approvals of
issuances of securities or assumptions of liability by High Desert
should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure. 18 CFR 385.211, 385.214 (2004).
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to
intervene or protest is December 13, 2006.
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition by the deadline above,
High Desert is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or
liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect
of any security of another person, provided that such issuance or
assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of
High Desert, compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably
necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by
continued approvals of High Desert's issuance of securities or
assumptions of liability.
    Copies of the full text of the Director's Order are available from
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary link. Enter the

docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
filed to access the document. Comments, protests, and interventions may
be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-20815 Filed 12-7-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: September 30, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 188)]
[Notices]
[Page 50180]
[DOCID:fr30se09-38]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1710-000]

KEB Trading, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

September 23, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
KEB Trading, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC, 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is October 13, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE, Washington, DC, 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-23545 Filed 9-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P