 [Federal Register Volume 82, Number 159 (Friday, August 18, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 39344-39347] [FR Doc No: 2017-16354]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-9112; Product Identifier 2016-NM-091-AD; Amendment

39-18982; AD 2017-16-05]

RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain

The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER

series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of a Krueger flap

bullnose departing an airplane during taxi, which caused damage to the

wing structure and thrust reverser. This AD requires a one-time

detailed visual inspection for discrepancies in the Krueger flap

bullnose attachment hardware, and related investigative and corrective

actions, if necessary. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe

condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective September 22, 2017.

    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by

reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of September

22, 2017.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,

contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data

Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA

90740-5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information

at the FAA, Transport Standards Staff, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,

WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,

call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-

9112.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-

9112; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and

5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket

contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and

other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-

5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,

Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Pohl, Aerospace Engineer,

Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO)

Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-

6450; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR

part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company

Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes.

The NPRM published in the Federal Register on September 29, 2016 (81 FR

66874) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM was prompted by a report of a Krueger

flap bullnose departing an airplane during taxi, which caused damage to

the wing

structure and thrust reverser. The NPRM proposed to require a one-time

detailed visual inspection for discrepancies in the Krueger flap

bullnose attachment hardware, and related investigative and corrective

actions, if necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct

missing Krueger flap bullnose hardware. Such missing hardware could

result in the Krueger flap bullnose departing the airplane during

flight, which could damage empennage structure and lead to the

inability to maintain continued safe flight and landing.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing

this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and

the FAA's response to each comment.

Support for the NPRM

    Vincent Romano, a private citizen, and United Airlines (UAL),

stated their support for the NPRM.

Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment of the Proposed Actions

    Aviation Partners Boeing stated that accomplishing the Supplemental

Type Certificate (STC) ST00830SE does not affect the actions specified

in the NPRM.

    We concur with the commenter. We have redesignated paragraph (c) of

the NPRM as paragraph (c)(1) and added paragraph (c)(2) to this AD to

state that installation of STC ST00830SE does not affect the ability to

accomplish the actions required by this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on

which STC ST00830SE is installed, a ``change in product'' alternative

method of compliance (AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply

with the requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.

Request To Reference the Latest Service Information

    All Nippon Airways (ANA), American Airlines (AAL), Boeing,

Jet2.com, TUIfly GmbH (HAP), UAL, and Kennedy Juma, requested revising

the NPRM to reference Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1327,

Revision 1, dated September 28, 2016. Some commenters pointed out that

the original issue had some errors in the illustrations and needed

certain clarifications. ANA and Boeing also requested that we provide

credit for accomplishing the original issue of the service information.

    We agree that this final rule should reference the latest service

information. Since we issued the NPRM, Boeing issued Boeing Alert

Service Bulletin 737-57A1327, Revision 1, dated September 28, 2016. We

have revised paragraphs (c)(1) (paragraph (c) of the proposed AD) and

(g) of this AD to reference Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1327,

Revision 1, dated September 28, 2016, for accomplishment of the

required actions. We have also revised this AD to provide credit for

using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1327, dated May 20, 2016, to

accomplish the required actions before the effective date of this AD.

Request To Correct the Latest Service Information

    AAL requested that Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1327,

Revision 1, dated September 28, 2016, be corrected to address errors in

Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4. AAL stated that these errors affect the

depiction of how the clevis assembly, clevis, and bullnose hinge lug

are attached to each other, and suggested that revising the figures to

correct the errors would clarify which parts must be subject to the

detailed inspection.

    We acknowledge that Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Boeing Alert Service

Bulletin 737-57A1327, Revision 1, dated September 28, 2016, contain

errors in the labeling of parts in the illustrations. However, the

instructions in the tables in the figures correctly identify the parts

and actions to be accomplished. Since the instructions are correct, the

service bulletin adequately addresses the unsafe condition. We do not

revise manufacturers' service information. However, Boeing might decide

to revise Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1327, Revision 1, dated

September 28, 2016, to correct the errors. We have not changed the AD

in this regard.

Request To Allow Alternate Replacement Procedure

    AAL and Southwest Airlines (SWA) requested that we revise the NPRM

to provide an option to replace cracked or deformed bullnose hinge lugs

or clevis assemblies with bullnose hinge lugs or clevis assemblies

instead of replacement with a Krueger flap assembly, as specified in

paragraph 3.B.2.a.(1)(a)1) of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-

57A1327, Revision 1, dated September 28, 2016. AAL suggested that the

replacement option could be done using certain sections of a component

maintenance manual (CMM). SWA suggested the use of Boeing production

installation drawings. Both AAL and SWA also stated that replacing only

the affected bullnose hinge lugs or clevis assemblies would also reduce

the cost of repair or replacement. SWA also stated that there is a

limited inventory of Krueger flap assemblies and that limited

inventory, combined with a 6-month compliance time could significantly

impair operators.

    We understand that the suggested replacement option might reduce

the burden on operators. However, we do not agree to revise this AD to

include the suggested changes. The repairs provided by the suggested

sections of the CMM address normal wear-and-tear, and these repairs may

not be appropriate for addressing damage that might result from an

improperly attached Krueger flap. Boeing informed us that there is no

procedure in the CMM that would provide step-by-step instructions to

remove only the bullnose other than by use of the drawing system.

Engineering instructions would be needed to ensure that the remainder

of the flap assembly is serviceable and not damaged in addition to the

damaged bullnose hinge lugs or clevis assembly, and that level of

instruction would be too much detail for an AD. However, once we issue

this AD, any person may request approval of an AMOC under the

provisions of paragraph (i) of this AD. We have not changed the AD in

this regard.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,

and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting

this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial

changes. We have determined that these minor changes:

     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the

NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and

     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was

already proposed in the NPRM.

    We also determined that these changes will not increase the

economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1327, Revision 1,

dated September 28, 2016. The service information describes procedures

for a one-time detailed visual inspection for discrepancies in the

Krueger flap bullnose attachment hardware, and related investigative

and corrective actions. This service information is reasonably

available because the interested parties have access to it through

their normal course of business or by the means identified in the

ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 1,495 airplanes of U.S. registry.

We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                                Cost per    Cost on U.S.

              Action                        Labor cost              Parts cost         product       operators

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Inspection of the Krueger flap      3 work-hours x $85 per     None................         $255        $381,225

 bullnose hardware.                  hour = $255.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide

cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.

    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be

covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected

individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected

individuals. As a result, we have included all available costs in our

cost estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to

issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the

authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,

describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in

Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General

requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing

regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator

finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within

the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition

that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this

rulemaking action.

    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the

Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by

FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is

normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but

during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the

authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes to

the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order

13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,

on the relationship between the national government and the States, or

on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various

levels of government.

    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:

    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive

Order 12866,

    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),

    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and

    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or

negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria

of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by

reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the

Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0

2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness

directive (AD):

2017-16-05 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18982; Docket No. FAA-

2016-9112; Product Identifier 2016-NM-091-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective September 22, 2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    (1) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -

700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes, certificated in any

category, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-

57A1327, Revision 1, dated September 28, 2016.

    (2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)

ST00830SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/354588EE63741A068625807D006726F6?OpenDocument&Highlight=st00830se)

does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by

this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST00830SE is

installed, a ``change in product'' alternative method of compliance

(AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with the

requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report of a Krueger flap bullnose

departing an airplane during taxi, which caused damage to the wing

structure and thrust reverser. We are issuing this AD to detect and

correct missing Krueger flap bullnose hardware. Such missing

hardware could result in the Krueger flap bullnose departing the

airplane during flight, which could damage empennage structure and

lead to the inability to maintain continued safe flight and landing.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,

unless already done.

(g) Inspection of the Krueger Flap Bullnose

    Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, do a

detailed inspection for discrepancies of the Krueger flap bullnose

attachment hardware, and do all applicable related investigative and

corrective actions,

in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert

Service Bulletin 737-57A1327, Revision 1, dated September 28, 2016.

Do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions

before further flight.

(h) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in

paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the

effective date of this AD using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-

57A1327, dated May 20, 2016.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO)

Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if

requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance

with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or

local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending

information directly to the manager of the certification office,

send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph

(j)(1) of this AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate

principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager

of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding

district office.

    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be

used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD

if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the

Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be approved,

the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation

must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval

must specifically refer to this AD.

    (4) For service information that contains steps that are labeled

as Required for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs

(i)(4)(i) and (i)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.

    (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step

and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply

with the AD. If a step or sub-step is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then

the RC requirement is removed from that step or sub-step. An AMOC is

required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and

identified figures.

    (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted

methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection

program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC

steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done

as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy

condition.

(j) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Alan Pohl,

Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 1601

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:

425-917-6590; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not

incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in

paragraphs (k)(3) and (k)(4) of this AD.

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the

incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed

in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.

    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do

the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.

    (i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1327, Revision 1, dated

September 28, 2016.

    (ii) Reserved.

    (3) For Boeing service information identified in this AD,

contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data

Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA

90740-5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.

    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport

Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Ave SW., Renton, WA. For information on

the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated

by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration

(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at

NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 26, 2017.

Jeffrey E. Duven,

Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 2017-16354 Filed 8-17-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 169 (Friday, August 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 45760]
[FR Doc No: 2019-18741]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9046-5]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General
Information<PHONE_NUMBER> or https://www.epa.gov/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 08/19/2019 10 a.m. ET Through 08/26/2019 10 a.m. ET
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

    Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's
comment letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20190192, Final, DOD, Other, Continental United States (CONUS)
Interceptor Site, Review Period Ends: 09/30/2019, Contact: Dr. Buff
Crosby<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20190202, Final, FAA, AK, Adoption--Modernization and
Enhancement of Ranges, Airspace, and Training Areas in the Joint
Pacific Alaska Range Complex in Alaska, Contact: Paula Miller 202-267-
7378.

    The U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) has adopted the portions specific to Battle Area
Complex Restricted Area R-2201 and the Expand Restricted Area R-2205,
including the Digital Multi-Purpose Training Range, of the Departments
of Army and the Air Force's Final EIS No. 20130181, filed 06/28/2013
with the EPA. FAA was a cooperating agency on this project. Therefore,
recirculation of the document is not necessary under Section 1506.3(c)
of the CEQ regulations.

EIS No. 20190203, Final, FHWA, NY, Van Wyck Expressway Capacity and
Access Improvements to JFK Airport Project, Contact: Glorimar Reyes,
Project Manager NYSDOT<PHONE_NUMBER>, Pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 139(n)(2),
FHWA has issued a combined FEIS and ROD. Therefore, the 30-day wait/
review period under NEPA does not apply to this action.
EIS No. 20190204, Final, TVA, TN, Transmission System Vegetation
Management Final Programmatic EIS, Review Period Ends: 09/30/2019,
Contact: Anita E. Masters<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20190205, Revised Draft, USFS, AZ, Apache-Sitgreaves National
Forests Public Motorized Travel Management Plan, Comment Period Ends:
10/29/2019, Contact: Kevin Holmes<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20190206, Draft, NOAA, FL, Draft Environmental Impact Statement
for Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary: A Restoration Blueprint,
Comment Period Ends: 01/31/2020, Contact: Beth Dieveney<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20190207, Final, USACE, TX, Matagorda Ship Channel, Port
Lavaca, Texas, Review Period Ends: 09/30/2019, Contact: Harmon Brown
409-766-3837.
EIS No. 20190208, Draft, BLM, AK, Willow Master Development Plan Draft
Environmental Impact Statement, Comment Period Ends: 10/15/2019,
Contact: Racheal Jones<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20190209, Draft, BLM, AK, Ambler Road Draft Environmental
Impact Statement, Comment Period Ends: 10/15/2019, Contact: Tina
McMaster-Goering<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20190210, Final, USFS, AK, Chugach National Forest Land
Management Plan, Review Period Ends: 10/29/2019, Contact: Susan
Jennings<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20190211, Final, NMFS, Other, State Management Program for
Recreational Red Snapper Amendment 50A to the Fishery Management Plan
for the Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico Review Period Ends:
09/30/2019 Contact: Lauren M. Waters<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Amended Notice

EIS No. 20190161, Draft, BR, CA, Auburn State Recreation Area
Preliminary General Plan and Auburn Project Lands Draft Resource
Management Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact
Statement, Comment Period Ends: 09/17/2019, Contact: Bonnie Van Pelt
916-537-7062. Revision to FR Notice Published 07/19/2019; Extending the
Comment Period from 09/03/2019 to 09/17/2019.

    Dated: August 26, 2019.
Robert Tomiak,
Director, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2019-18741 Filed 8-29-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 92 (Friday, May 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 27769]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11352]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12595-002]

Greybull Valley Irrigation District; Notice of Preliminary Permit
Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To
Intervene, and Competing Applications

    On February 1, 2012, the Greybull Valley Irrigation District filed
an application for a preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of
the Federal Power Act (FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of the
Upper Sunshine Reservoir Hydroelectric Power Project (Upper Sunshine
Project or project) to be located on Sunshine Creek, near Meeteetse,
Park County, Wyoming. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if
issued, is to grant the permit holder priority to file a license
application during the permit term. A preliminary permit does not
authorize the permit holder to perform any land-disturbing activities
or otherwise enter upon lands or waters owned by others without the
owners' express permission.
    The proposed project would utilize the existing Upper Sunshine dam
and reservoir having a total storage capacity of 53,515 acre-feet at
elevation 6,595 feet mean sea level, and would consist of the following
new features: (1) A 6-foot-diameter penstock extending from the
existing conduit to the powerhouse adjacent to the dam; (2) a
powerhouse containing one Francis turbine/generator unit rated at 5
megawatts or less at 150 feet of net head; (3) a tailrace channel
discharging from the powerhouse to Sunshine Creek; (4) a 3-mile-long,
25-kilovolt transmission line extending from the project to a
transmission line owned by Rocky Mountain Power (the point of
interconnection); and (5) appurtenant facilities. The estimated annual
generation of the Upper Sunshine Project would be 6 gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contacts: Mr. Lee Allen, 989 Highway 20 West, P.O. Box
44, Emblem, Wyoming 82422; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Mr. William
Schlenker, 989 Highway 20 West, P.O. Box 44, Emblem, Wyoming 82422;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Kim Nguyen; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and
competing applications may be filed electronically via the Internet.
See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's
Web site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail an original and seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-12595-002) in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: May 4, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-11352 Filed 5-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P