[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 2125]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00533]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-2736.

Extension:
    Regulation BTR;
OMB Control No. 3235-0579, SEC File No. 270-521.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget (``OMB'') for extension and approval.
    Regulation Blackout Trade Restriction (``Regulation BTR'') (17 CFR
245.100-245.104) clarifies the scope and application of Section 306(a)
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (``Act'') (15 U.S.C. 7244(a)).
Section 306(a)(6) [15 U.S.C.7244(a)(6)] of the Act requires an issuer
to provide timely notice to its directors and executive officers and to
the Commission of the imposition of a blackout period that would
trigger the statutory trading prohibition of Section 306(a)(1) [15
U.S.C. 7244(a)(1)]. Section 306(a) of the Act prohibits any director or
executive officer of an issuer of any equity security, directly or
indirectly, from purchasing, selling or otherwise acquiring or
transferring any equity security of that issuer during any blackout
period with respect to such equity security, if the director or
executive officer acquired the equity security in connection with his
or her service or employment. Approximately 1,230 issuers file
Regulation BTR notices approximately 5 times a year for a total of
6,150 responses. We estimate that it takes approximately 2 hours to
prepare the blackout notice for a total annual burden of 2,460 hours.
The issuer prepares 75% of the 2,460 annual burden hours for a total
reporting burden of (1,230 x 2 x 0.75) 1,845 hours. In addition, we
estimate that an issuer distributes a notice to five directors and
executive officers at an estimated 5 minutes per notice (1,230 blackout
period x 5 notices x 5 minutes) for a total reporting burden of 512
hours. The combined annual reporting burden is (1,845 hours + 512
hours) 2,357 hours.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
    Please direct your written comment to Pamela Dyson, Acting
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission,
c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 or send
an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: January 9, 2015.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-00533 Filed 1-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19384-19386]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09260]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-83115; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2018-030]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Certain Rules of the Rule 7000A Series To Make Conforming and
Technical Changes

DATES: April 26, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 17, 2018, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend certain rules of the Rule 7000A
Series concerning the Order Audit Trail System to make conforming and
technical changes.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is proposing to make the following three changes to
the Rule 7000A Order Audit Trail Series: (1) Amend Rule 7410A(o)(1)(A)
to harmonize the rule with FINRA Rule 7410(o)(1)(A); (2) correct rule
citations in Rules 7430A and 7450A; and (3) delete the rule text under
Rule 7470A, which lapsed in 2015.
    The Exchange's Rule 7000A Series imposes an obligation on Exchange
members to record in electronic form and report to FINRA on a daily
basis certain information with respect to orders originated, received,
transmitted, modified, canceled, or executed by members in Nasdaq-
listed stocks. FINRA's Order Audit Trail System (``OATS'') captures
this order information and integrates it with quote and transaction
information to create a time-sequenced record of orders, quotes, and
transactions. This information is used by FINRA staff to conduct
surveillance and investigations of members for potential violation of
Exchange rules, federal securities laws, and FINRA rules.
    The Exchange adopted the Rule 7000A Series to copy FINRA OATS
rules, where appropriate. As a general principle, the Exchange
endeavors to keep its rules corresponding to FINRA rules as closely
worded and structured as possible to the FINRA rules on which they are
based. In certain instances, such as FINRA Rule 7410(o)(2), which
concerns an exception to the definition of a Reporting Member relating
to members operating on equities floors, the Exchange has not copied
those inapplicable FINRA rules. Generally, the Exchange seeks to keep
the Rule 7000 Series consistent with the applicable portions FINRA Rule
7040 Series. The proposed changes will harmonize Nasdaq rules with
analogous FINRA rules, which have changed since the Exchange first
adopted its rules.
First Change
    The Exchange is proposing to amend Rule 7410A(o)(1)(A) to harmonize
the rule with FINRA Rule 7410(o)(1)(A). Rule 7410A(o) provides the
definition of ``Reporting Member,'' which means a member that receives
or originates an order and has an obligation to record and report
information under Rules 7440A and 7450A. Rule 7410A(o)(1) provides an
exception to the general definition if the member meets four
conditions. The first condition the member must meet is that the member
engages in a non-discretionary order routing process, pursuant to which
it immediately routes, by electronic or other means, all of its orders
to a single receiving Reporting Member. On May 12, 2014, FINRA amended
FINRA Rule 7410(o)(1)(A) to allow a member to route its orders to two
receiving Reporting Members, if two conditions were met.\3\ First, the
orders are routed by the member to each receiving Reporting Member on a
pre-determined schedule approved by FINRA. Second, the FINRA member's
orders are routed to two receiving Reporting Members pursuant to the
schedule for a time period not to exceed one year. The rule change
permits FINRA members to continue to rely on the exception from the
definition of Reporting Member if, for a limited time, the member
routes orders to two different Reporting Members, provided the criteria
are met. FINRA noted in adopting the change that the rule was intended
to accommodate introducing firms that transition to a different
clearing firm over time and, during the transition, route their orders
two different clearing firms, both of which report the introducing
firm's information to OATS

during the transition time.\4\ The Exchange believes that this
additional limited exception is appropriate for its members, which
likewise may encounter a transition to a clearing firm whereby it [sic]
would no longer be eligible for the exception to the definition of
Reporting Member. Accordingly, the Exchange is proposing to adopt the
FINRA rule text under Rule 7410A(o)(1)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72191 (May 20,
2014), 79 FR 30219 (May 27, 2014) (SR-FINRA-2014-024).
    \4\ Id. at 30220.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Second Change
    The Exchange is also proposing to correct rule citations in Rules
7430A and 7450A. Rule 7430A ``Synchronization of Member Business
Clocks'' provides the requirements for synchronizing member business
clocks, and states that Nasdaq members shall comply with FINRA Rule
7430 as if such Rule were part of Nasdaq's rules. There is no FINRA
Rule 7430, but rather the appropriate FINRA rule to cite to is FINRA
Rule 4590 ``Synchronization of Member Business Clocks.'' Accordingly,
the Exchange is correcting the erroneous citation in Rule 7430A.
    Rule 7450A ``Order Data Transmission Requirements'' provides the
requirements for order data transmission, and states that, except as
provided in paragraph (b), Nasdaq members and persons associated with a
member shall comply with FINRA Rule 7450A as if such Rule were part of
Nasdaq's rules. There is no FINRA Rule 7450A and FINRA Rule 7450
``Order Data Transmission Requirements'' is the appropriate FINRA rule
to cite. Accordingly, the Exchange is deleting the erroneous ``A'' from
the citation.
Third Change
    The Exchange is proposing to delete the rule text under Rule 7470A
in its entirety, which lapsed in 2015, and to hold the rule [sic] in
reserve. Rule 7470A provided an exemption from the order recording and
data transmission requirements of Rules 7440A and 7450A OATS rules
applicable to manual orders. To qualify for the exemption, a member
must have met the following criteria: (1) The member and current
control affiliates and associated persons of the member have not been
subject within the last five years to any final disciplinary action,
and within the last ten years to any disciplinary action involving
fraud; (2) the member has annual revenues of less than $2 million; (3)
the member does not conduct any market making activities in Nasdaq
Stock Market equity securities; (4) the member does not execute
principal transactions with its customers (with limited exception for
principal transactions executed pursuant to error corrections); and (5)
the member does not conduct clearing or carrying activities for other
firms. The exemption was limited to a maximum time of two years
although a member was able to request an additional exemption prior to
the expiration of a grant of existing exemptive relief. The exemptive
authority provided by the rule permitted the Exchange to grant relief
to members that meet certain criteria in situations where, for example,
the reporting of order information would be unduly burdensome for the
member or where temporary relief from the OATS Rules, in the form of
additional time to achieve compliance, would permit the members to
avoid unnecessary expense or hardship. The exemption has not been
requested by any Nasdaq member to date and the Exchange does not
believe that Nasdaq members are likely to need the exemption, since the
vast majority of such members to which the rule applies are electronic
proprietary trading firms that would not qualify for the exemption.
Thus, the Exchange is proposing to eliminate the rule text under Rule
7470A from its rule book, and to hold the rule [sic] in reserve.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\5\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\6\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest,
by harmonizing the Exchange's OATS rules with those of FINRA, on which
they are based. Consequently, the proposed changes will conform
Exchange Rules to changes made to corresponding FINRA rules, thus
promoting application of consistent regulatory standards with respect
to rules that FINRA enforces pursuant to its regulatory services
agreement with the Exchange. With respect to the proposed amendment to
Rule 7410A(o)(1)(A), the exemption will provide Exchange members the
same flexibility to transition to a new clearing firm that FINRA
members enjoy. The rule is intended to accommodate introducing firms
that transition to a different clearing firm over time and, during the
transition, route their orders two different clearing firms, both of
which report the introducing firm's information to OATS during the
transition time. With respect to the proposed amendment to Rule 7470A
to eliminate the expired exemption from the rule book, the Exchange
believes that it is consistent with the Act because the exemption has
never been requested by a Nasdaq member. Moreover, the Exchange does
not believe that the vast majority of its members would qualify for the
exemption, since such most Nasdaq members that are subject to the rule
conduct an electronic proprietary trading business and the exemption
applies to manual orders. Adopting the amended rule text under Rules
7410A will also align the Exchange rulebook with FINRA's, thereby
eliminating complexity from FINRA's work under a regulatory services
agreement with the Exchange. With respect to the technical corrections
to Rules 7430A and 7450A, the Exchange believes that these changes are
consistent with the Act because they will prevent investor confusion
that may be caused by incorrect rule citations in the Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed changes align the
Exchange's rules with those of FINRA, which will assist it in its
oversight work done pursuant to a regulatory services agreement, and
makes technical corrections to the rules. Consequently, the Exchange
does not believe that the proposed changes implicate competition at
all.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \7\ and

subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2018-030 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2018-030. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2018-030, and should be submitted
on or before May 23, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-09260 Filed 5-1-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


The Bentazon Case (103901 & 275200)

Screening Level Usage Analysis (SLUA)

Date: August 20, 2009

What is a Screening Level Usage Analysis (SLUA)?

Available estimates of pesticide usage data for a particular active
ingredient that is used on agricultural crops in the United States.

Pesticide usage data obtained from various sources.  The data are then
merged, averaged, and rounded so that the presented information is not
proprietary, business confidential, or trade secret.

What does it contain?

Pesticide usage data for a single active ingredient only.

Agricultural use sites (crops) that the pesticide is reported to be used
on.

Available pesticide usage information from U.S. states that produce 80%
or more of a crop, in most cases, or less than 80%, in rare cases,
depending on the scope of the survey and available resources.

Annual percent of crop treated (average & maximum) for each agricultural
crop.

Average annual pounds of the pesticide applied for each agricultural
crop (i.e., for the states surveyed, not for the entire United States).

What assumptions can I make about the reported data?

Average pounds of active ingredient applied - Values are calculated by
merging pesticide usage data sources together; averaging across all
observations, then rounding.  Note:  If the estimated value is less than
500, then that value is labeled <500.  Estimated values between 500 &
<1,000,000 are rounded to 1 significant digit.  Estimated values of
1,000,000 or greater are rounded to 2 significant digits.)

Average percent of crop treated - Values are calculated by merging data
sources together; averaging by year, averaging across all years, &
rounding to the nearest multiple of 5.  Note:  If the estimated value is
less than 2.5, then the value is labeled <2.5.  If the estimated value
is less than 1, then the value is labeled <1.

Maximum percent of crop treated - Value is the single maximum value
reported across all data sources, across all years, & rounded up to the
nearest multiple of 5.  Note:  If the estimated value is less than 2.5,
then the value is labeled <2.5.

What are the data sources used?

USDA-NASS (United States Department of Agriculture’s National
Agricultural Statistics Service) – pesticide usage data from 2001 to
2007.

Private pesticide market research – pesticide usage data from 2001 to
2007.

NPUD 2002 (National Pesticide Use Database) pesticide usage data from
the CropLife America Foundation are used only if data are not available
from the other sources.

California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) Pesticide Use
Reporting (PUR) data for 2000 to 2005 when 95% or more of a crop is
grown California.

What are the limitations to the data?

Additional registered uses may exist but are not included because the
available surveys do not report usage (e.g., small acreage crops).

Lack of reported usage data for the pesticide on a crop does not imply
zero usage.

Usage data on a particular site may be noted in data sources, but not
quantified.  In these instances, the site would not be reported in the
SLUA.

Non-agricultural use sites (e.g., turf, post-harvest, mosquito control,
etc.) are not reported in the SLUA.  A separate request must be made to
receive these estimates.

Some sites show some use, even though they are not on the label.  This
usage could be due to various factors, including, but not limited to
Section 18 requests, existing stocks of the chemical, data collection
errors, and experimental use permits (EUPs).

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Screening Level Estimates of Agricultural Uses of Bentazon,Sodium salt
(103901)

Sorted Alphabetically

	Percent Crop Ttd.

				Crop	Lbs. A.I.	Avg.	Max.

1	Beans, Green	40,000	25	30

2	Cabbage +	<500	<1	<2.5

3	Cantaloupes +	<500	<1	<2.5

4	Corn	100,000	<1	<2.5

5	Cucumbers +	<500	<1	<2.5

6	Dry Beans/Peas	600,000	35	50

7	Mint ( NPUD '02 )	20,000	30	N/C

8	Onions +	1,000	5	5

9	Peanuts	100,000	20	30

10	Peas, Green	40,000	30	40

11	Peppers +	<500	<1	<2.5

12	Potatoes +	1,000	<1	<2.5

13	Pumpkins +	<500	<1	<2.5

14	Rice	30,000	<2.5	5

15	Sod ( NPUD '02 )	8,000	15	N/C

16	Sorghum	1,000	<1	<2.5

17	Soybeans	400,000	<1	<2.5

18	Squash +	2,000	5	5

19	Sugar Beets +	2,000	<1	<2.5

20	Sweet Corn	60,000	15	25

21	Tomatoes +	<500	<1	<2.5

22	Watermelons +	1,000	<1	<2.5

All numbers rounded.

<500	Less than 500 pounds of active ingredient

<2.5	Less than 2.5 percent of crop treated

<1	Less than 1 percent of crop treated

N/C	Not Calculated

+	Crops not known to be listed on active end use product registrations
or as Section 18 emergency

exemptions when this report was run

SLUA data sources include:

USDA-NASS (United States Department of Agriculture's National
Agricultural Statistics Service)

Private Pesticide Market Research

NPUD 2002 (National Pesticide Use Database) of the CropLife America
Foundation

California DPR (Department of Pesticide Regulation)

These results reflect amalgamated data developed by the Agency and are
releasable to the public.


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 50 (Thursday, March 14, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9225-9226]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04648]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 31240; Amdt. No. 3841]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, suspends, or removes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures (ODPs) for operations at certain
airports. These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption
of new or revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the
National Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective March 14, 2019. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of March 14, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matters incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:

For Examination

    1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Ops-M30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, West Bldg., Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    2. The FAA Air Traffic Organization Service Area in which the
affected airport is located;
    3. The office of Aeronautical Navigation Products, 6500 South
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

Availability

    All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available online free
of charge. Visit the National Flight Data Center at nfdc.faa.gov to
register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP
copies may be obtained from the FAA Air Traffic Organization Service
Area in which the affected airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Nichols, Flight Procedures
and Airspace Group, Flight Technologies and Procedures Division, Flight
Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration. Mailing Address:
FAA Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, Flight Procedures and Airspace
Group, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Registry Bldg. 29, Room 104,
Oklahoma City, OK 73125. Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by establishing,
amending, suspending, or removes SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and/or ODPS.
The complete regulatory description of each SIAP and its associated
Takeoff Minimums or ODP for an identified airport is listed on FAA form
documents which are incorporated by reference in this amendment under 5
U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 CFR part 97.20. The applicable FAA
forms are FAA Forms 8260-3, 8260-4, 8260-5, 8260-15A, and 8260-15B when
required by an entry on 8260-15A.
    The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, their complex
nature, and the need for a special format make publication in the
Federal Register expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use
the regulatory text of the SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead
refer to their graphic depiction on charts printed by publishers of
aeronautical materials. Thus, the advantages of incorporation by
reference are realized and publication of the complete description of
each SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP listed on FAA form documents is
unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR sections and
specifies the types of SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs with their
applicable effective dates. This amendment also identifies the airport
and its location, the procedure, and the amendment number.

Availability and Summary of Material Incorporated by Reference

    The material incorporated by reference is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section.
    The material incorporated by reference describes SIAPS, Takeoff
Minimums and/or ODPS as identified in the amendatory language for Part
97 of this final rule.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP as Amended in the
transmittal. Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and textual ODP amendments
may have been issued previously by the FAA in a Flight Data Center
(FDC) Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency action of immediate
flight safety relating directly to published aeronautical charts.
    The circumstances that created the need for some SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP amendments may require making them effective in less
than 30 days. For the remaining SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, an
effective date at least 30 days after publication is provided.
    Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these SIAPs and
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied to the
conditions existing or anticipated at the affected airports. Because of
the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and
public procedure under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are impracticable and contrary
to the public interest and, where applicable, under 5 U.S.C 553(d),
good cause exists for making some SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866;(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,1979) ;
and (3)does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial

number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air traffic control, Airports, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).

    Issued in Washington, DC on February 22, 2019.
Rick Domingo,
Executive Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) is amended by
establishing, amending, suspending, or removing Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures and/or Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle Departure
Procedures effective at 0901 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114,
40120, 44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

Effective 25 April 2019

Miami, FL, Miami Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 9, Amdt 10C
Calhoun, GA, Tom B. David Fld, LOC-A, Orig-A, CANCELLED
Plymouth, IN, Plymouth Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Orig-A
Plymouth, IN, Plymouth Muni, VOR RWY 10, Amdt 12A
Plymouth, IN, Plymouth Muni, VOR RWY 28, Amdt 11A
Hardinsburg, KY, Breckinridge County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Orig
Hardinsburg, KY, Breckinridge County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Orig
Hardinsburg, KY, Breckinridge County, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Orig
Boston, MA, General Edward Lawrence Logan Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 4R,
ILS RWY 4R SA CAT I, ILS RWY 4R CAT II, ILS RWY 4R CAT III, Amdt 11
Boston, MA, General Edward Lawrence Logan Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 15R,
Amdt 2
Boston, MA, General Edward Lawrence Logan Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 27,
Amdt 3
Boston, MA, General Edward Lawrence Logan Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4R,
Amdt 3
Boston, MA, General Edward Lawrence Logan Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 15R,
Amdt 2
Boston, MA, General Edward Lawrence Logan Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 27,
Amdt 1
Grand Rapids, MN, Grand Rapids/Itasca Co-Gordon Newstrom Fld, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 34, Orig-C
Engelhard, NC, Hyde County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 11, Orig
Engelhard, NC, Hyde County, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Clovis, NM, Clovis Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, Orig-A
East Hampton, NY, East Hampton, VOR-A, Amdt 11B, CANCELLED
Ellenville, NY, Joseph Y Resnick, GPS RWY 4, Orig, CANCELLED
Ellenville, NY, Joseph Y Resnick, GPS RWY 22, Orig, CANCELLED
Ellenville, NY, Joseph Y Resnick, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Orig
Ellenville, NY, Joseph Y Resnick, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Orig
Hazelton, PA, Hazelton Rgnl, LOC RWY 28, Amdt 9
Hazelton, PA, Hazelton Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Amdt 3
Hazelton, PA, Hazelton Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Amdt 2
Honey Grove, PA, Stottle Memorial, COPTER RNAV (GPS) 086, Orig,
CANCELLED

    Rescinded: On February 20, 2019 (84 FR 4996), the FAA published
an Amendment in Docket No. 31238, Amdt No. 3839, to Part 97 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations under sections 97.29 and 97.37. The
following entries for Key West, FL, and Pierre, SD, effective April
25, 2019, are hereby rescinded in their entirety:

Key West, FL, Key West Intl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt
2
Pierre, SD, Pierre Rgnl, ILS OR LOC RWY 31, Amdt 12D

[FR Doc. 2019-04648 Filed 3-13-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P