[Federal Register: February 27, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 38)]
[Notices]
[Page 9807-9808]
[DOCID:fr27fe06-42]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP06-54-000, CP06-55-000, CP06-56-000]

Broadwater Energy LLC, Broadwater Pipeline LLC; Notice of
Applications

February 17, 2006.
    Take notice that on January 30, 2006, Broadwater Energy LLC
(Broadwater Energy) filed an application under section 3 of the Natural
Gas Act (NGA) and Part 153 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations
seeking authorization to site, construct and operate an offshore
liquefied natural gas (LNG) receiving terminal and associated
facilities (Floating Storage and Regasification Unit) in Long Island
Sound, approximately nine miles from the shore of Long Island in New
York State waters, as a place of entry for the importation of LNG.
Broadwater Energy's proposed terminal is intended to facilitate the
importation of LNG from foreign nations into the United States.
    Also, take notice that on January 30, 2006, Broadwater Pipeline LLC
(Broadwater Pipeline) concurrently filed an application requesting: (i)
In Docket No. CP06-55-000 a certificate of public convenience and
necessity, pursuant to subpart A of part 157 of the Commission's
regulations, authorizing Broadwater Pipeline to construct, own, operate
and maintain a 30-inch, 22 mile subsea lateral (and related facilities)
as a single-use pipeline; and (ii) in Docket No. CP06-56-000,
Broadwater Pipeline requests a blanket certificate under section 7(c)
of the NGA and part 157, subpart F of the Commission's regulations to
perform routine activities in connection with the future construction,
operation and maintenance of the proposed 22-mile pipeline. Broadwater
Pipeline seeks authorization to permit its proposed pipeline to be
operated as a single-use pipeline. That is, it would be used for just
one purpose--to transport natural gas approximately 22 miles from the
Floating Storage and Regasification Unit (FSRU), to a subsea
interconnection with an existing interstate pipeline.
    Broadwater Energy and Broadwater Pipeline respectfully request that
the Commission issue a final order granting them all necessary
authorizations for the Broadwater LNG project by March 31, 2007. We
note that certain information regarding design standards for the FSRU
that was requested by the FERC and U.S. Coast Guard during the Pre-
Filing Process was not provided in the application. FERC staff and the
U.S. Coast Guard are unable to initiate the design/engineering review
of the FSRU or complete the Waterway Suitability Assessment process
without this information. Consequently, at this time we are unable to
project a schedule for our review or issuance of the draft
environmental impact statement (DEIS). Once this information is
received, we will issue a notice establishing the schedule for the
completion of the DEIS and the issuance of all Federal authorizations.
    These applications are on file with the Commission and open to
public inspection. These filings are available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''

link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, please
contact FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free
at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions regarding these applications should be directed to
Brian D. O'Neill or Bruce W. Neely, LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae LLP,
1875 Connecticut Ave., NW., Suite 1200, Washington, DC 20009 by
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    On November 29, 2004, the Commission staff granted Broadwater
Energy's and Broadwater Pipeline's request to utilize the Pre-Filing
Process and assigned Docket No. PF05-4-000 to staff activities
involving the Broadwater LNG project. Now, as of the filing of
Broadwater Energy's and Broadwater Pipeline's applications on January
30, 2006, the Pre-Filing Process for this project has ended. From this
time forward, Broadwater Energy's and Broadwater Pipeline's proceeding
will be conducted in Docket Nos. CP06-54-000, CP06-55-000, and CP06-56-
000, as noted in the caption of this Notice.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the below listed comment date, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a motion to intervene in
accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the
NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party status will be placed on
the service list maintained by the Secretary of the Commission and will
receive copies of all documents filed by the applicant and by all other
parties. A party must submit 14 copies of filings made with the
Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other
party in the proceeding. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for
court review of Commission orders in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    Motions to intervene, protests and comments may be filed
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper; see, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.
    Comment Date: March 10, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-2700 Filed 2-24-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 199 (Friday, October 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71178-71179]
[FR Doc No: 2016-24934]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2016-0161]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Extension of a
Currently Approved Information Collection Request: Unified Registration
System, FMCSA Registration/Updates.

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FMCSA
announces its plan to submit the Information Collection Request (ICR)
described below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review
and approval. The information collection request (ICR) titled,
``Unified Registration System'' (78 FR 52608 dated August 23, 2013)
required those entities that are subject to the FMCSA's licensing,
registration and certification regulations to use a new application
Form MCSA-1 titled, ``FMCSA Registration/Update(s).''

DATES: Please send your comments on or before November 14, 2016. OMB
must receive your comments by this date in order to act quickly on the
ICR.

ADDRESSES: All comments should reference Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) Docket Number FMCSA-2016-0161. Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on the proposed information
collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget. Comments should be addressed to the attention
of the Desk Officer, Department of Transportation/Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeffrey Secrist, Office of
Registration and Safety Information, Department of Transportation,
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Telephone Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Email
Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m., E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Unified Registration System, FMCSA Registration/Updates.
    OMB Control Number: 2126-0051.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently-approved information
collection.
    Respondents: Motor carriers (including private and exempt for-hire
carriers effective January 14, 2017), freight forwarders, brokers,
cargo tank (CT) facilities, and intermodal equipment providers (IEPs)
that are required to initially register for and then maintain their
safety and operating authority registrations with USDOT.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 78,400 respondents for initial
registration filings; 507,500 respondents for completing the biennial
update; 13,000 respondents for filing name/address change requests;
1,100 respondents for transfer of operating authority registration
notifications; and 2,030 respondents for reinstatements of operating
authority registration.
    Estimated Time per Response: 1.34 hours for initial registration
filings; and 10 minutes each for the biennial update, name/address
change request, notification of transfer of operating authority
registration, and reinstatement of revoked or inactive registration.
    Expiration Date: November 30, 2016
    Frequency of Response: This information collection covers the
initial application to register with FMCSA as a motor carrier, freight
forwarder, broker, intermodal equipment provider, and cargo tank
facility; as well as subsequent applications to complete a biennial
update or any other update of the information recorded on the
registration system, submit a name/address change request, seek a
reinstatement of revoked or inactive registration, and notify the
Agency of a transfer of operating authority registration.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 105,000 burden hours for the initial
applications of registration; 84,600 burden hours for completing
biennial updates; 2,200 burden hours for filing name/address change
requests; 180 burden hours for operating authority registration
transfer notifications; and 340 burden hours for reinstatements of
revoked or inactive registration; for a total estimated annual burden
of 192,320 hours.
    Background: Section 103 of the ICC Termination Act of 1995 (ICCTA)
enacted 49 U.S.C. 13908, which required the Secretary of Transportation
(Secretary) to propose regulations to replace four current
identification and registration systems with a single, online, Federal
system--the Unified Registration System (URS). The Unified Carrier
Registration Act of 2005, subtitle C of title IV of the Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy
for Users (SAFETEA-LU) [Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1714, August 10,
2005] modified the requirements for a unified registration system by
amending Sec.  13908. In particular, SAFETEA-LU repealed the Single
State Registration System (SSRS), one of the four systems identified in
Sec.  13908, and replaced it with the Unified Carrier Registration
Agreement. It also modified the requirement that fees collected under
the new system cover the costs of operating and upgrading the
registration by placing limitations on certain fees that the Agency
could charge. Section 4304 of SAFETEA-LU reiterated the congressional
requirement for a single, Federal online system to replace the four
individual systems identified under 49 U.S.C. 13908. This consolidation
simplifies current Federal registration processes and makes data on
interstate motor carriers, property brokers, freight forwarders, and
other regulated entities more accessible.
    This information collection supports the DOT Strategic Goal of
Safety. It will streamline the existing registration process and ensure
that FMCSA can more efficiently track motor carriers, freight
forwarders, brokers, and other entities regulated by the Agency.
    The information on the on-line Form MCSA-1 will be used by FMCSA to
identify its regulated entities, to help prioritize the Agency's
activities, to aid in assessing the safety outcomes of those activities
and for statistical purposes. The FMCSA will collect the information
electronically through on-line forms. The information is currently
being collected through a series of forms, which may be filed on-line
or on paper. Every interstate motor carrier operating commercial motor
vehicles is required to register with FMCSA to obtain a USDOT Number.
Most for-hire carriers are also required to file a separate application
for operating authority under 49 U.S.C. 13901. Mexico- and Non-North
America-domiciled motor carriers file a separate registration form. The
information collection will replace these three collections and create
a single on-line form. This rule will streamline the collection and
eliminate the need for motor carriers to file the same information on
multiple forms.
    On June 10, 2016, FMCSA published a notice in the Federal Register
requesting public comments on ``Unified Registration System, FMCSA
Registration/Updates'' Information Collection Request, OMB Control
Number 2126-0051 (81 FR 37661). No comments were received.

    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including: (1) Whether the proposed
collection is necessary for the performance of FMCSA's functions; (2)
the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways for the FMCSA to enhance
the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the collected information; and
(4) ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the
quality of the collected information.

    Issued under the authority delegated in 49 CFR. 1.87 on: October
11, 2016.
G. Kelly Regal,
Associate Administrator for Office of Research and Information
Technology.
[FR Doc. 2016-24934 Filed 10-13-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 246 (Thursday, December 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79725-79726]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32756]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-65994; File No. SR-DTC-2011-12]

 Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Depository Trust Company;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Rules Relating to DTC's Deposits Service Guide

December 16, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on December 14, 2011, The
Depository Trust Company (``DTC'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change described
in Items I and II below, which items have been prepared primarily by
DTC. DTC filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(4) thereunder so that the
proposed rule change was effective upon filing with the Commission.\2\
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii) and 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The purpose of this proposed rule change is to update DTC's
Deposits Service Guide in order to streamline the document and to
mitigate certain risks associated with certain deposit processes.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The text of the proposed rule change is attached as Exhibit
5 to DTC's filing, which is available at www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/rule_filings/2011/dtc/2011-12.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, DTC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. DTC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A),
(B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of these
statements.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Commission has modified the text of the summaries
prepared by DTC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

(1) Purpose
    DTC's deposits service allow participants to use a full range of
safekeeping and processing services for various types of eligible
securities. DTC is now proposing to update its Deposits Service Guide
(``Deposits Guide'') in order to streamline the document and to
mitigate risk associated with certain deposit processes. DTC is also
proposing to make some ministerial changes regarding methods of
notification, definitions, and communication inputs in order to provide
a more precise version of the Deposits Guide.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For example, DTC detailed the PBS functions that
participants have the ability to use with the deposit service and
made changes to phone numbers and contact information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, DTC is proposing to make the following updates to the
Deposits Guide:
    (a) DTC is proposing to update the procedure associated with the
use of Medallion Signature Guarantee stamps as it relates to its Branch
Deposit Service in order to document the process that it takes to
safeguard the use and storage of such stamps.
    (b) DTC is proposing to add a section to the Deposits Guide
detailing its Paperless Legal Transfer Program.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ For more information regarding DTC's Paperless Legal
Transfer Program, see Important Notices B6931 (September
29, 2004), B7139 (December 1, 2004), and B9787
(June 21, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (c) DTC is proposing to remove the narrative describing its custody
services because such services are fully described in DTC's Custody
Service Guide.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The language DTC is proposing to eliminate from the Deposit
Guide continues to be included in the Custody Service Guide.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(2) Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to DTC because
proposed changes to the procedures associated with DTC's deposit
service should facilitate the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions by reducing the costs,
inefficiencies, and risks associated with the physical safekeeping of
securities. In so doing, the proposal should in turn also enhance the
use of DTC's existing services.

(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    DTC does not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any
burden on competition.

(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not been
solicited DTC. DTC will notify the Commission of any written comments
received by DTC.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective upon filing pursuant
to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(4) \9\
thereunder because it is a change in an existing service that does not
adversely affect the safeguarding of

securities or funds in the custody or control of the clearing agency
and does not significantly affect the respective rights or obligations
of the clearing agency or persons using the service. At any time within
sixty days of the filing of such rule change, the Commission summarily
may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml) or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-DTC-2011-12 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-DTC-2011-12. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090, on official business days between the
hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filings will also be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of DTC and
on DTC's Web site at http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/rule_filings/2011/dtc/2011-12.pdf. All comments received will be posted without
change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information
from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to
make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number
SR-DTC-2011-12 and should be submitted on or before January 12, 2012.

    For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-32756 Filed 12-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 154 (Friday, August 9, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39385-39386]
[FR Doc No: 2019-17046]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-86567; File No. SR-CboeEDGA-2019-012]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Designation of Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed
Rule Change To Introduce a Liquidity Provider Protection on EDGA

August 5, 2019.
    On June 7, 2019, Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposal to introduce a delay mechanism on EDGA. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on June 26,
2019.\3\ The Commission has received fourteen comments on the proposed
rule change.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86168 (June 20,
2019), 84 FR 30282.
    \4\ See Letters from R.T. Leuchtkafer, dated July 12, 2019;
Steve Crutchfield, Head of Market Structure, CTC Trading Group, LLC,
dated July 15, 2019; Tyler Gellasch, Executive Director, Healthy
Markets, dated July 16, 2019; Larry Tabb, Founder and Research
Chairman, TABB Group, dated July 16, 2019; Stephen John Berger,
Managing Director, Global Head of Government and Regulatory Policy,
Citadel Securities, dated July 16, 2019; Mehmet Kinak, Vice
President & Global Head of Systematic Trading & Market Structure,
and Jonathan D. Siegel, Vice President & Senior Legal Counsel
(Legislative & Regulatory Affairs), T. Rowe Price, dated July 16,
2019; Adam Nunes, Head of Business Development, Hudson River Trading
LLC, dated July 16, 2019; Joanna Mallers, Secretary, FIA Principal
Traders Group, dated July 16, 2019; Ray Ross, Chief Technology
Officer, Clearpool, dated July 16, 2019; Eric Swanson, CEO, XTX
Markets LLC (Americas), dated July 16, 2019; John Thornton, Co-
Chair, Hal S. Scott, President, and R. Glenn Hubbard, Co-Chair,
Committee on Capital Markets Regulation, dated July 16, 2019;
Kirsten Wegner, Chief Executive Officer, Modern Markets Initiative,
dated July 17, 2019; Theodore R. Lazo, Managing Director and
Associate General Counsel, SIFMA, dated July 18, 2019; Eric Swanson,
CEO, XTX Markets LLC (Americas), dated July 31, 2019, available at
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboeedga-2019-012/srcboeedga2019012.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \5\ provides that, within 45 days of
the publication of the notice of the filing of a proposed rule change,
or within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed
rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be
disapproved. The 45th day after publication of the notice for this
proposed rule change is August 10, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is extending the 45-day time period for Commission
action on the proposed rule change. The Commission finds that it is
appropriate to designate a longer period within which to take action on
the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the
proposed rule change. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\6\ the Commission designates September 24, 2019 as the date by
which the Commission shall either approve, disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to

disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR-CboeEDGA-2019-012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-17046 Filed 8-8-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: December 27, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 248)]
[Notices]
[Page 77834-77835]
[DOCID:fr27de06-111]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-54963; File No. SR-CHX-2006-30]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Permit Routing From the
Matching System to a Destination Selected by a Participant

December 19, 2006.

I. Introduction

    On October 19, 2006, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to permit CHX participants to identify a
destination to which an order should be routed when its execution would
improperly trade through other markets or its display would improperly
lock or cross other markets. The proposed rule change was published for
comment in

the Federal Register on October 30, 2006.\3\ The Commission received no
comments regarding the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54642 (October 23,
2006), 71 FR 63372.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    The proposal would allow the Exchange to follow a participant's
instructions to route an order to a destination of the participant's
choice instead of cancelling the order back to the participant when an
execution could not take place in the Matching System because the
execution would improperly trade through another market \4\ or the
display of an order would improperly lock or cross another market.\5\
The Exchange proposes to provide these routing services pursuant to a
separate agreement between the Exchange and each participant on whose
behalf orders would be routed. The participant would be responsible for
ensuring that it has a relationship with its chosen destination to
permit the requested access. The Exchange would not be involved in the
execution of the order nor would the Exchange take responsibility for
handling of the order by the destination selected by the
participant.\6\ The Exchange, however, would report any execution or
cancellation of the order by the destination to the participant that
submitted the order and would notify the destination of any
cancellations or changes to the order submitted by the order-sending
participant. The Exchange's routing service would be a facility of the
Exchange subject to the Exchange's rules and fees. The destinations
chosen by each participant would not constitute Exchange facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange's rules currently provide that the Exchange's
Matching System will not execute an order if its execution would
cause an improper trade-through of another ITS market or, when
Regulation NMS is implemented, if its execution would be improper
under Rule 611 of Regulation NMS (together, an ``improper trade-
through''). See CHX Article 20, Rule 5; see also 17 CFR 242.611.
    \5\ The Exchange's rules currently provide that the Matching
System will not display an order if its display would improperly
lock or cross other markets. See CHX Article 20, Rule 6.
    \6\ See CHX Article 20, Rule 5, proposed Interpretation and
Policy .03(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion

    The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange, and in
particular, with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ which requires, among
other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be
designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \8\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition and
capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that the proposed rule change may increase
the efficiency of CHX participants in seeking to execute their
customers' orders that are ineligible for execution or display in the
CHX Matching System. In particular, orders that otherwise would be
cancelled back to a participant may be sent directly to a destination
chosen by the participant for handling. The Commission notes that fees
and charges for the Exchange's routing service must be consistent with
the Act,\9\ and the Exchange must provide its routing service in
compliance with, among other things, the provisions of the Act
requiring the rules of a national securities exchange not to permit
unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or
dealers.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \10\ See 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\11\ that the proposed rule change (SR-CHX-2006-30) is approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78S(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-22082 Filed 12-26-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 30820]
[FR Doc No: 2023-10133]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 34910; 812-15449]

Hennessy Funds Trust and Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

May 8, 2023.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC'').

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice of an application under section 6(c) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (``Act'') for an exemption from section 15(a) of
the Act and Rule 18f-2 thereunder, as well as from certain disclosure
requirements in rule 20a-1 under the Act, Item 19(a)(3) of Form N-1A,
Items 22(c)(1)(ii), 22(c)(1)(iii), 22(c)(8) and 22(c)(9) of Schedule
14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and sections 6-07(2)(a),
(b), and (c) of Regulation S-X (``Disclosure Requirements'').

SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: The requested exemption would permit Applicants
to enter into and materially amend subadvisory agreements with
subadvisers without shareholder approval and would grant relief from
the Disclosure Requirements as they relate to fees paid to the
subadvisers.

APPLICANTS: Hennessy Funds Trust and Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

FILING DATES: The application was filed on March 31, 2023.

HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing on any application by emailing
the SEC's Secretary at [email protected] and serving the
Applicants with a copy of the request by email, if an email address is
listed for the relevant Applicant below, or personally or by mail, if a
physical address is listed for the relevant Applicant below. Hearing
requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on June 2,
2023, and should be accompanied by proof of service on the Applicants,
in the form of an affidavit, or, for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the
desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason for the request,
and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing
may request notification by emailing the Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES: The Commission: [email protected]. Applicant: Teresa
M. Nilsen, [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trace W. Rakestraw, Senior Special
Counsel, at<PHONE_NUMBER> (Division of Investment Management, Chief
Counsel's Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For Applicants' representations, legal
analysis, and conditions, please refer to Applicants' application,
dated March 31, 2023, which may be obtained via the Commission's
website by searching for the file number at the top of this document,
or for an Applicant using the Company name search field on the SEC's
EDGAR system. The SEC's EDGAR system may be searched at https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/legacy/companysearch.html. You may also
call the SEC's Public Reference Room at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-10133 Filed 5-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: December 22, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 244)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 67977-67978]
[DOCID:fr22de09-12]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

49 CFR Part 565

[Docket No. NHTSA 2008-0022]
RIN 2127-AK63

Vehicle Identification Number Requirements; Technical Amendment

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NHTSA published in the Federal Register of April 30, 2008, a
final rule making certain changes in the 17-character vehicle
identification number (VIN) system so that the system will remain
viable for at least another 30 years. The effective date of that final
rule was October 27, 2008. The agency published a correction document
on May 16, 2008. Today's document makes further correction of several
typographic errors in the regulatory text adopted by the April 2008
final rule.

DATES: Effective Date: December 22, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical and policy questions:
Kenneth O. Hardie, Office of Crash Avoidance Standards, NHTSA, W43-458,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 (Telephone: 202-366-
6987) (Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>).
    For legal questions: Deirdre Fujita, Office of Chief Counsel,
NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 (Telephone:
202-366-2992) (Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NHTSA published a final rule in the Federal
Register of April 30, 2008, (73 FR 23367; NHTSA Docket 2008-0022) that
amended 49 CFR Part 565, making certain changes in the 17-character
vehicle identification number (VIN) system so that there will be a
sufficient number of unique manufacturer identifiers and VINs to use
for at least another 30 years. A May 16, 2008, document corrected
several typographical errors that appeared in the regulatory text of
the April 30, 2008 final rule (73 FR 28370, Docket 20008-0022). Today's
document corrects several additional errors, primarily incorrect
references to sections of the CFR that have been renumbered.

List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 565

    Motor vehicle safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

0
In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA amends 49 CFR part 565 as
follows:

PART 565--VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (VIN) REQUIREMENTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 565 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 322, 30111, 30115, 30117, 30141, 30146,
30166, and 30168; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50.

Subpart B--VIN Requirements

0
2. Section 565.13 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (g) to read
as follows:

Sec.  565.13  General requirements.

    (a) Each vehicle manufactured in one stage shall have a VIN that is
assigned by the manufacturer. Each vehicle manufactured in more than
one stage shall have a VIN assigned by the incomplete vehicle
manufacturer. Vehicle alterers, as specified in 49 CFR 567.7, shall
utilize the VIN assigned by the original manufacturer of the vehicle.
* * * * *
    (g) Each character in each VIN shall be one of the letters in the
set: [ABCDEFGHJKLMNPRSTUVWXYZ] or a numeral in the set: [0123456789]
assigned according to the method given in Sec.  565.15.
* * * * *

Subpart C--Alternative VIN Requirements in Effect for Limited
Period

0
3. Section 565.23 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (g) to read
as follows:

Sec.  565.23  General requirements.

    (a) Each vehicle manufactured in one stage shall have a VIN that is
assigned by the manufacturer. Each vehicle manufactured in more than
one stage shall have a VIN assigned by the incomplete vehicle
manufacturer. Vehicle alterers, as specified in 49 CFR 567.7, shall
utilize the VIN assigned by the original manufacturer of the vehicle.
* * * * *
    (g) Each character in each VIN shall be one of the letters in the
set: [ABCDEFGHJKLMNPRSTUVWXYZ] or a numeral in the set: [0123456789]
assigned according to the method given in Sec.  565.25.
* * * * *

    Issued: December 11, 2009.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E9-30027 Filed 12-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 12, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42746-42748]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19212]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2017-0361; FRL-9967-57-Region 4]

Air Plan Approval; KY; Revisions to Ambient Air Quality Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission
submitted by the Commonwealth of Kentucky, through the Kentucky
Division for Air Quality (KDAQ), on September 9, 2016. The changes to
the SIP that EPA is taking final action to approve pertain to changes
to the Commonwealth's air quality standards for carbon monoxide (CO),
lead (Pb), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone, particulate matter
(both PM10 and PM2.5), and sulfur dioxide
(SO2) to reflect the historical and current National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). EPA has determined that the September 9,
2016, SIP revision is consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).
KDAQ's submission also included additional air quality standards for
hydrogen sulfide, fluorides, and odor; however, EPA is not approving
these state standards into the SIP.

DATES: This rule will be effective October 12, 2017.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2017-0361. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential
Business Information or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madolyn Sanchez, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. Ms.

Sanchez can be reached via telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via
electronic mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Sections 108 and 109 of the CAA govern the establishment, review,
and revision, as appropriate, of the NAAQS to protect public health and
welfare. The CAA requires periodic review of the air quality criteria--
the science upon which the standards are based--and the standards
themselves. EPA's regulatory provisions that govern the NAAQS are found
at 40 CFR 50--National Primary and Secondary Ambient Air Quality
Standards.
    In a proposed rulemaking published on July 17, 2017, EPA proposed
to approve changes to the Commonwealth's regulations for ambient air
quality standards in the Kentucky SIP, submitted by the Commonwealth on
September 9, 2016. See 82 FR 32671. The September 9, 2016, submission
amends the Commonwealth's regulations for ambient air quality standards
which are found at 401 KAR 53:010. The revision also includes textual
changes to language in the regulation to provide regulatory clarity, as
well as updating and reformatting the Appendix A table of ambient air
quality standards and Appendix A footnotes. The details of Kentucky's
submission and the rationale for EPA's action are explained in the
proposed rulemaking. Comments on the proposed rulemaking were due on or
before August 16, 2017. EPA received no adverse comments on the
proposed action.

II. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of Kentucky
regulation 401 KAR 53:010--Ambient air quality standards, effective
July 19, 2016. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
generally available through www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA
Region 4 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
    Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion
in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by EPA into that plan,
are fully federally-enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA
as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA's approval, and
will be incorporated by reference by the Director of the Federal
Register in the next update to the SIP compilation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Final Action

    EPA is taking final action to approve the Commonwealth of Kentucky
SIP revision submitted on September 9, 2016. The submission revises
Kentucky regulation 401 KAR 53:010 to reflect changes to the
Commonwealth's air quality standards for CO, Pb, NO2, ozone,
both PM10 and PM2.5, and SO2 to
reflect the historical and current NAAQS. The revision also includes
textual changes to language in the regulation to provide regulatory
clarity, as well as updating and reformatting the Appendix A table of
ambient air quality standards and Appendix A footnotes.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 13, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: August 25, 2017.
V. Anne Heard,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart S--Kentucky

0
2. Section 52.920(c), Table 1 is amended under Chapter 53 by revising
the entry for ``401 KAR 53:010'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.920  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                   Table 1--EPA-Approved Kentucky Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           State
        State citation              Title/subject     effective date    EPA approval date        Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         Chapter 53 Ambient Air Quality
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
401 KAR 53:010................  Ambient air quality         07/19/16  09/12/17, [Insert
                                 standards.                            citation of
                                                                       publication].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2017-19212 Filed 9-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


EPA Regulatory Update API October 2, 2003 Protecting the Ozone Layer 2003 biggest ozone hole ever! And it keeps growing  Review   HCFC Production and Import   HCFC Allocation Rule   HCFC 141b Phaseout   SNAP Final Rule   Exemption Allowance Petitions   HCFC Restrictions   Use   Products HCFC Production & Import Bans   Jan 1, 2003: HCFC 141b   Jan 1, 2010: HCFC 22 & HCFC

142b HCFC Allowance Allocation Rule   January 21, 2003 ( 68 FR 2819)

  Only allowances holders can produce/ import HCFC 22 & HCFC 142b   Production ( Section 82.17)

  Consumption ( Section 82.19)

  Article 5 ( Section 82.18)

  Only allowance holders can produce HCFC

141b for export   Export Production Allowances ( Section 82.18)

° Once a chemical is phased out it can still be produced up to 100% of its baseline   Allowances are tradeable   Subject to EPA approval   Contact Tracking System Manager at ( 202) 564 9192 SNAP Final Rule   July 22, 2002 ( 67 FR 47703)

  HCFC 124: unacceptable substitute for 141b   Legal to switch from HCFC 141b to HCFC

22 or HCFC 142b only in:

° commercial refrigeration,

° sandwich panels,

° slabstock and " other" foam.

  Demonstrate/ Document:

° technical constraint preventing transition to alternatives,

° continued investigation into alternatives,

° timeframe for transition. HCFC 141b Exemption Allowances   Annual Petition Process   Due October 31 of the preceding year   2004 Control Period: Oct 31, 2003   Formulators of HCFC 141b, other U. S. gov't agencies, space vehicle entities   Criteria listed in 82.16( h)

  Availability of stockpiled HCFC 141b   Technical constraints preventing transition to alternatives   Research, develop and implement alternatives   Guidance found at www. epa. gov/ ozone/ snap 2003 Petitions   12 received for 2003   2 approved ( A 98 33, IV G, 27 28)

  10 denied   Variety of end uses HCFC Use   HCFC 141b: existing can continue   Decision deferred in SNAP Final Rule   Reviewing new info on alternatives and will issue a final decision   HCFC 22: existing use can continue   HCFC 142b: existing use can continue   Jan 1, 2015: ALL HCFC use banned ( CAA 605)

  Exception for refrigerant servicing to 2020 HCFC Products   Jan 1, 1994: Plastic foam products made with HCFCs banned ( CAA 610)

  Exemption: thermal insulation foam products ° www. epa. gov/ ozone/ snap/ foams/ qa   " Blended" foam systems   Legal to import   EPA considering ways to address the issue ° Use restriction under SNAP ° Clarify regulatory definition of controlled substance to include blended systems Future Challenges   Ensure and facilitate HCFC 141b transition   SPFA grant ( Sep 01   Sep 04)

  2004 petitions   HCFC 22,  142b Phaseout: Jan 1, 2010   Continued research, development and implementation of alternatives   EPA industry assessment Contacts   HCFC Production & Import:

  Vera Au ( 202) 564 2216   HCFC Reporting & Trades:

  Mike James ( 202) 564 9192   HCFC 141b Petitions:

  Suzie Kocchi ( 202) 564 5289   All other foam issues ( incl SNAP):

  Suzie Kocchi ( 202) 564 5289   EPA is moving .. Effective October 20, 2003

  NEW building address:

  1301 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005   NEW phone number:

  Suzie Kocchi ( 202) 343 9387   NEW fax number:

  TBD   Website:

  www. epa. gov/ ozone


[Federal Register: December 14, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 240)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 71060]
[DOCID:fr14de07-4]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2007-28778; Airspace Docket No. 07-AGL-6]

Establishment of Class E5 Airspace; Prairie Du Sac, WI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes a Class E airspace area extending upward
from 700 feet above the surface at Prairie Du Sac, WI. The effect of
this rule is to provide appropriate controlled Class E airspace for
aircraft departing from and executing instrument approach procedures to
Sauk-Prairie Airport, Prairie du Sac, WI and to segregate aircraft
using instrument approach procedures in instrument conditions from
aircraft operating in visual conditions.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, February 14, 2008. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Grant Nichols, System Support, DOT
Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901
Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On Friday, September 7, 2007, the FAA published in the Federal
Register (72 FR 51391) a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to amend Title
14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by establishing class E
airspace at Prairie Du Sac, WI. Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking proceeding by submitting written
comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments objecting to the
proposal were received.

The Rule

    This rule amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part
71 by establishing a Class E airspace area extending upward from 700
feet above the surface at Sauk-Prairie Airport, Prairie du Sac, WI. The
establishment of Area Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning System (GPS)
Instrument Approach Procedures (IAP) have made this action necessary.
The intended effect of this action is to provide adequate controlled
airspace for Instrument Flight Rules operations at Sauk-Prairie
Airport, Prairie Du Sac, WI. The area will be depicted on appropriate
aeronautical charts.
    Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet or more above
the surface of the earth are published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9R, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed August 15,
2007, and effective September 15, 2007, which is incorporated by
reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designation listed in
this document will be published subsequently in the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
therefore, this regulation--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charge with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
since it contains aircraft executing instrument approach procedures to
Saul-Prairie Airport, Prairie Du Sac, WI.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

Adoption of the Amendment

0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec. 71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9R, signed August 15, 2007, and effective
September 15, 2007, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet
or more above the surface of the earth.
* * * * *

AGL WI E5 Prairie Du Sac, WI [New]

Sauk-Prairie Airport, Prairie Du Sac, WI
    (Lat. 43[deg]17'52'' N., long. 89[deg]45'21'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7-mile radius of Sauk-Prairie Airport, Prairie Du Sac, WI.
* * * * *

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX on December 4, 2007.
Rick Farrell,
Acting Team Manager, System Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 07-6038 Filed 12-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register: June 30, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 126)]
[Notices]
[Page 36882]
[DOCID:fr30jn08-85]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1758-DR]

Arkansas; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Arkansas (FEMA-1758-DR), dated May 20, 2008, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: June 24, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Arkansas is hereby amended to include the following
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his
declaration of May 20, 2008.

    Phillips County for Public Assistance (already designated for
Individual Assistance.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In
Presidential Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidential Declared
Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and
Households; 97.050, Presidential Declared Disaster Assistance to
Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-14738 Filed 6-27-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P