[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48155-48156]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18994]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14345-001]

Rock River Beach, Inc.; Notice of Application Accepted for Filing
With the Commission; Intent To Waive Scoping; Soliciting Motions To
Intervene and Protests; Ready for Environmental Analysis; and
Soliciting Comments, Terms and Conditions, Recommendations, and
Prescriptions

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Original Minor License.
    b. Project No.: 14345-001.
    c. Date filed: November 23, 2012.
    d. Applicant: Rock River Beach, Inc.
    e. Name of Project: Rock River Beach Hydroelectric Project
    f. Location: On the Rock River, in the Town of Onota, Alger County,
Michigan. The project would not occupy any federal lands.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Mary C. Edgar, 2617 Rockwood, East Lansing,
MI 48823; or by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Aaron Liberty at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at
Aaron<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing motions to intervene and protests, requests
for cooperating agency status, comments, terms and conditions,
recommendations, and prescriptions: 60 days from the issuance date of
this notice; reply comments are due 105 days from the issuance date of
this notice.
    All documents may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit
brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration,
using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the
end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail an original and five copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency.
    k. This application has been accepted for filing and is now ready
for environmental analysis.
    l. The Rock River Beach Project consists of the following existing
facilities: (1) A 33.6-foot-long by 5.5-foot-high, L-shaped gravity dam
with a crest elevation of 606.95 feet North American Vertical Datum of
1988 (NAVD 88) that impounds a 5-acre reservoir with a total storage
capacity of 25 acre-feet; (2) an 8-foot-wide spillway containing two
steel sluice gates, a 24-inch-high bottom gate that remains fixed in
place and a 36-inch-high slide gate that is raised and lowered
manually; (3) a 30-foot-wide by 50-foot-long power canal; (4) an 18-
foot by 24-foot wood-framed powerhouse housing a 3-kilowatt (kW)
generating unit run by a water wheel and a 5-kW generating unit run by
a 24-inch vertical-shaft propeller turbine for a total installed
capacity of 8 kW; and (5) two, 220-volt, 0.5-mile-long transmission
lines. The powerhouse also contains a 6-kW antique Edison generator
that operates via the water wheel and is operated once a year.
    The applicant operates the project in a run-of-river mode (i.e., at
any point in time, the combined outflow from the project's dam and
powerhouse approximates all inflows to the project's reservoir). The
project operates from June 20 through September 15, and October 15
through November 15. At all other times, the reservoir is drawn down
approximately 4 feet with the fixed sluice gate maintaining an 18 to
24-inch head to prevent the upstream migration of sea lamprey from Lake
Superior. Diversion of river flow through the 50-foot-long power canal
and to the powerhouse creates a 100-foot-long bypassed reach in the
Rock River. Average annual generation at the project varies between
9,000 and 18,000 kilowatt-hours.
    All of the existing project facilities are owned by the applicant.
The applicant proposes no new facilities or changes to existing project
operations.
    m. Due to the projects works already existing and the applicant's
close coordination with federal and state agencies during the
preparation of the application, we intend to waive scoping. Based on a
review of the application and resource agency consultation letters,
Commission staff intends to prepare a single environmental assessment
(EA). Commission staff has determined that the issues that need to be
addressed in its EA have been adequately identified during the pre-
filing period, which included a public meeting and site visit, and no
new issues are likely to be identified through additional scoping. The
EA will consider assessing the potential effects of project operation
on geology and soils, aquatic, terrestrial, threatened and endangered
species, recreation and land use, aesthetic, and cultural and historic
resources.
    n. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item h above.
    Register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
    o. Any qualified applicant desiring to file a competing application
must submit to the Commission, on or before the specified intervention
deadline date, a competing development application, or a notice of
intent to file such an application. Submission of a timely notice of
intent allows an interested person to file the competing development
application no later than 120 days after the specified intervention
deadline date. Applications for preliminary permits will not be
accepted in response to this notice.
    A notice of intent must specify the exact name, business address,
and telephone number of the prospective applicant, and must include an
unequivocal statement of intent to submit a development application. A

notice of intent must be served on the applicant(s) named in this
public notice.
    Anyone may submit comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in
accordance with the requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18
CFR 385.210, .211, and .214. In determining the appropriate action to
take, the Commission will consider all protests or other comments
filed, but only those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with
the Commission's Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any
comments, protests, or motions to intervene must be received on or
before the specified comment date for the particular application.
    All filings must: (1) Bear in all capital letters the title
``PROTEST'', ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', ``NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE
COMPETING APPLICATION,'' ``COMPETING APPLICATION,'' ``COMMENTS,''
``REPLY COMMENTS,'' ``RECOMMENDATIONS,'' ``TERMS AND CONDITIONS,'' or
``PRESCRIPTIONS;'' (2) set forth in the heading the name of the
applicant and the project number of the application to which the filing
responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone number of the
person protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise comply with the
requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All comments,
recommendations, terms and conditions or prescriptions must set forth
their evidentiary basis and otherwise comply with the requirements of
18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may obtain copies of the application directly
from the applicant. A copy of any protest or motion to intervene must
be served upon each representative of the applicant specified in the
particular application. A copy of all other filings in reference to
this application must be accompanied by proof of service on all persons
listed in the service list prepared by the Commission in this
proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.
    p. Procedural schedule: The application will be processed according
to the following procedural schedule. Revisions to the schedule may be
made as appropriate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Milestone                           Target date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments, recommendations, and terms     September 2013.
 and conditions due.
Reply comments due.....................  November 2013.
Notice of the availability of the EA...  February 2014.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: July 31, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-18994 Filed 8-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Synthetic Chemicals MACT Compliance Strategy Issue   Family of Materials   From the Floor Information request:

  The term   product process line  is a collection of equipment used to manufacture a product. If a facility manufactures multiple grades of the same product or different variations of the products ( i. e. blue, black, and red resins), it can group those products and report a single product process line so long as the facility can justify the grouping based in similarities of raw materials, or chemistry    Products that involve different HAPs or different process equipment in case of dedicated processes should not be grouped together

  From the Preamble of the Draft Regulation:

  we believe that the production of chemicals that vary only slightly in molecular structure, functional groups or other characteristics, and are produced by procedures that have essentially identical emissions sources and emission stream characteristics should be considered as one process

  From the Definition Section of the Draft Regulation:

Family of materials means grouping of materials with the same basic composition,

produced using the same basic feedstocks, but that may vary for example by molecular weight, functional group, or manufacturing equipment configuration.

Examples of families of materials include, but are not limited to, alkyd resins,

polyester resins, and synthetic fatty acids. Synthetic Chemicals MACT Compliance Strategy Issue   Family of Materials   Method for breakdown of chemicals based on functionality Level 1 Imaging Chemicals Level 2 Couplers Coupler Intermediates Dyes Dye Intermediates Stabilizers Stabilizer Intermediates Addenda Addenda Intermediates Suspension Polymers,   Level 3 Yellow Couplers Magenta Couplers Cyan Couplers Masking Couplers Level 4 Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Level 5 Image Coupler Image Modifier Synthetic Chemicals MACT Compliance Strategy Issue   Process Vent Definition   From the definition section of the regulation:

 . Process vent means a vent from a unit operation or vents from multiple unit operations within a process that are manifolded together into a common header,

through which a HAP containing gas stream is or has the potential to be, released to the atmosphere. Examples include but are not limited to vents on condensers used for product recovery, reactors, filters, centrifuges, and process tanks.

 . Emissions streams that are undiluted and uncontrolled containing < 50 ppmv HAP,

as determined through process knowledge . Are not considered process vents


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23613-23614]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10096]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2011-0010]

Draft Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Hazard Mitigation
Safe Room Construction

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Program and the Hazard
Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) may provide funding to eligible applicants for eligible,
feasible, and cost-effective activities that have the purpose of
reducing or eliminating risks to life and property from hazards and
their effects. One such activity is the construction and installation
of safe rooms to protect populations from extreme wind events (e.g.,
hurricane, tornado). FEMA has prepared a draft Programmatic
Environmental Assessment (PEA) to address the potential impacts to the
human environment resulting from the installation and construction of
safe rooms. The purpose of the PEA is to facilitate FEMA's compliance
with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by providing a
framework to address the potential environmental impacts of this
project type.

DATES: Comments on the draft Programmatic Environmental Assessment may
be submitted on or before May 27, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket ID FEMA-2011-
0010, by one of the following methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Search for
docket ID FEMA-2011-0010 and follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
    E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Include Docket ID FEMA-2011-0010 in
the subject line of the message.
    Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Legislation, Regulations, & Policy
Division, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
500 C Street, SW., Room 835, Washington, DC 20472-3100.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket ID. Regardless of the method used for submitting comments or
material, all submissions will be posted, without change, to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov, and will
include any personal information you provide. Therefore, submitting
this information makes it public. You may wish to read the Privacy Act
notice that is available via the Privacy Notice link in the footer of
http://www.regulations.gov.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read the draft Programmatic
Environmental Assessment or comments submitted by the public on this
document, go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov and search for docket ID FEMA-2011-0010. These
documents may also be inspected at FEMA, Office of Chief Counsel, Room
835, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472-3100. In addition, the
draft and final Programmatic Environmental Assessment and related
documents will be accessible on FEMA's environmental documents page at
http://www.fema.gov/plan/envdocuments.shtm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jomar Maldonado, Environmental
Officer, Office of Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation,
FEMA, at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or phone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Draft Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Hazard Mitigation Safe
Room Construction

    The purpose of the draft Programmatic Environmental Assessment
(PEA) is to facilitate FEMA's compliance with the National

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by providing a framework to address the
potential environmental impacts of safe room construction projects. The
following five alternatives are considered in the PEA: No Action;
Retrofit or Renovation of an Existing or Proposed Facility; Safe Room
Connected to an Existing Building and Beyond Original Footprint; New
Stand-Alone Construction in Previously Disturbed Areas; and New Stand-
Alone Construction in Previously Undisturbed Areas.
    The PEA also provides the public and decision-makers with the
information required to understand and evaluate the potential
environmental consequences of actions funded by FEMA. In addition to
meeting the goals of impact identification and disclosure, the PEA
addresses the need to streamline the NEPA review process in order to
provide timely delivery of hazard mitigation assistance to communities
in areas at risk of wind events.
    The analysis presented in the PEA relies on FEMA's experience
regarding environmental impacts that can be expected with activities
involving construction, ground disturbance, removal of vegetation, and
modification/retrofitting of existing structures. It is also based on a
review of scientific literature, consultation with regulatory and
resource agencies, and expert opinion. FEMA will consider the analysis
in the PEA to determine whether a Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) or a Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement is appropriate for the action alternatives described and
assessed in the PEA.
    FEMA will use the PEA to evaluate the environmental impacts of
grant-funded safe rooms. The PEA will also assist in determining when
more site-specific information is needed and what level of
environmental analysis and documentation is required for more complex
projects to comply with NEPA.

    Authority:  National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 4331 et seq.; 40 CFR 1500.1 et seq.; 44 CFR 10.1
et seq.

    Dated: April 19, 2011.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011-10096 Filed 4-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-A6-P


DCPA-Chlorthal-dimethyl (078701)

Screening Level Usage Analysis (SLUA)

Date: August 18, 2010

What is a Screening Level Usage Analysis (SLUA)?

Available estimates of pesticide usage data for a particular active
ingredient that is used on agricultural crops in the United States.

Pesticide usage data obtained from various sources.  The data are then
merged, averaged, and rounded so that the presented information is not
proprietary, business confidential, or trade secret.

What does it contain?

Pesticide usage data for a single active ingredient only.

Agricultural use sites (crops) that the pesticide is reported to be used
on.

Available pesticide usage information from U.S. states that produce 80%
or more of a crop, in most cases, or less than 80%, in rare cases,
depending on the scope of the survey and available resources.

Annual percent of crop treated (average & maximum) for each agricultural
crop.

Average annual pounds of the pesticide applied for each agricultural
crop (i.e., for the states surveyed, not for the entire United States).

What assumptions can I make about the reported data?

Average pounds of active ingredient applied - Values are calculated by
merging pesticide usage data sources together; averaging across all
observations, then rounding.  Note:  If the estimated value is less than
500, then that value is labeled <500.  Estimated values between 500 &
<1,000,000 are rounded to 1 significant digit.  Estimated values of
1,000,000 or greater are rounded to 2 significant digits.)

Average percent of crop treated - Values are calculated by merging data
sources together; averaging by year, averaging across all years, &
rounding to the nearest multiple of 5.  Note:  If the estimated value is
less than 2.5, then the value is labeled <2.5.  If the estimated value
is less than 1, then the value is labeled <1.

Maximum percent of crop treated - Value is the single maximum value
reported across all data sources, across all years, & rounded up to the
nearest multiple of 5.  Note:  If the estimated value is less than 2.5,
then the value is labeled <2.5.

What are the data sources used?

USDA-NASS (United States Department of Agriculture’s National
Agricultural Statistics Service) – pesticide usage data from 2001 to
2008.

Private pesticide market research – pesticide usage data from 2001 to
2008.

California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) Pesticide Use
Reporting (PUR) data for 2000 to 2008.

What are the limitations to the data?

Additional registered uses may exist but are not included because the
available surveys do not report usage (e.g., small acreage crops).

Lack of reported usage data for the pesticide on a crop does not imply
zero usage.

Usage data on a particular site may be noted in data sources, but not
quantified.  In these instances, the site would not be reported in the
SLUA.

Non-agricultural use sites (e.g., turf, post-harvest, mosquito control,
etc.) are not reported in the SLUA.  A separate request must be made to
receive these estimates.

Some sites show some use, even though they are not on the label.  This
usage could be due to various factors, including, but not limited to
Section 18 requests, existing stocks of the chemical, data collection
errors, and experimental use permits (EUPs).

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Screening Level Estimates of Agricultural Uses of
DCPA-Chlorthal-dimethyl (078701)

Sorted Alphabetically

	Percent Crop Ttd.

				Crop	Lbs. A.I.	Avg.	Max.

1	Beans, Green	2,000	<1	<2.5

2	Broccoli	200,000	50	65

3	Brussels Sprouts *	<500	N/C	N/C

4	Cabbage	20,000	5	15

5	Cantaloupes	5,000	<1	<2.5

6	Cauliflower	40,000	20	35

7	Chicory *  +	<500	N/C	N/C

8	Cucumbers	7,000	<1	<2.5

9	Onions	100,000	15	25

10	Peppers	5,000	<2.5	<2.5

11	Pumpkins+	<500	<1	<2.5

12	Squash	3,000	<1	<2.5

13	Strawberries	5,000	<2.5	5

14	Tomatoes	30,000	<2.5	5

15	Watermelons	8,000	<2.5	5

All numbers rounded.

<500	Less than 500 pounds of active ingredient

<2.5	Less than 2.5 percent of crop treated

<1	Less than 1 percent of crop treated

N/C	Not Calculated

*	CA data only (95% or more of U.S. acres in California)

+	Crops not known to be listed on active end use product registrations
or as Section 18 emergency

exemptions when this report was run

SLUA data sources include:

USDA-NASS (United States Department of Agriculture's National
Agricultural Statistics Service)

Private Pesticide Market Research

California DPR (Department of Pesticide Regulation)

These results reflect amalgamated data developed by the Agency and are
releasable to the public.


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 12, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 48686]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17614]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER20-2587-000]

Kings Point Wind, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced Kings Point
Wind, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is August 25, 2020.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://ferc.gov) using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 5, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-17614 Filed 8-11-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


	ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

	40 CFR Part 52

	[EPA-R03-OAR-2007-0215; FRL-        ]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West
Virginia; 110(a)(1) 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan and Amendments to the
1-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan

AGENCY:  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION:  Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions submitted by West Virginia. These revisions pertain to: 1) the
maintenance plan prepared by West Virginia to maintain the 8-hour
national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for ozone in Greenbrier
County, which is designated attainment for the ozone NAAQS; and 2) two
amendments to the existing 1-hour ozone maintenance plan, which include
(a) removal of the obligation to submit a maintenance plan for the
1-hour NAAQS eight years after approval of the initial 1-hour
maintenance plan, and (b) removal of the State’s obligation to
implement contingency measures upon a violation of the 1-hour NAAQS.
The purpose of this proposed approval is to ensure Federal
enforceability of the state air program plan and to maintain consistency
between the State-adopted plan and the approved SIP.  This action is
being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before [insert date 30
days from date of publication].

ADDRESSES:  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number
EPA-R03-OAR-

2007-0215, by one of the following methods:

A.   www.regulations.gov.  Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.

     B.    E-mail:   HYPERLINK<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>.

     C.    Mail:   EPA- R03-OAR-2007-0215, Marilyn Powers, Acting Branch
Chief, Air Quality Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103.

     D.   Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III
address.  Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket(s normal
hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.

Instructions:  Direct your comments to Docket ID No.
EPA-R03-OAR-2007-0215.  EPA's policy is that all comments received will
be included in the public docket without change, and

may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through
www.regulations.gov or e-mail.  The www.regulations.gov website is an
(anonymous access( system, which means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your
comment.  If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going
through  www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the Internet.  If you submit an
electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or
CD-ROM you submit.  If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.  Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.

Docket:  All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.  Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form.  Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.  Copies of the State submittal
are available at the West Virginia Department of Environmental
Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601 57th Street SE, Charleston,
West Virginia 25304.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Irene Shandruk,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  On November 29, 2006, the West Virginia
Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP) submitted a revision to
its State Implementation Plan (SIP) for approval of the section
110(a)(1) 8-hour Ozone Maintenance Plan for Greenbrier County, West
Virginia, and for concurrent approval of two amendments to the existing
1-hour ozone maintenance plan.

I.    Background

Section 110(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires, in part, that
states submit to EPA plans to maintain any NAAQS promulgated by EPA.
EPA interprets this provision to require that areas that were
maintenance areas for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS but attainment for the
8-hour ozone NAAQS submit a plan to demonstrate the continued
maintenance of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS.  EPA established June 15, 2007,
three years after the effective date of the initial 8-hour ozone
designations, as the deadline for submission of plans for these areas.

On May 20, 2005, EPA issued guidance that applies, in part, to areas
that are designated attainment/unclassifiable for the 8-hour ozone
standard and that had an approved 1-hour ozone maintenance plan.  The
purpose of the guidance, referred to as section 110(a)(1) guidance, is
to assist the states in the development of a SIP which addresses the
maintenance requirements

found in section 110(a)(1) of the CAA.  There are five components of the
section 110(a)(1) maintenance plan which are: (1) An attainment
inventory, which is based on actual typical

summer day emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides of
nitrogen (NOx) for a ten-year period from a base year as chosen by the
state; (2) a maintenance demonstration which shows how the area will
remain in compliance with the 8-hour ozone standard for 10 years after
the effective date of designations (June 15, 2004); (3) a commitment to
continue to operate air quality monitors; (4) a contingency plan that
will ensure that a violation of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS is promptly
addressed; and (5) an explanation of how the State will track the
progress of the maintenance plan.

II.   Summary of SIP Revision

The WVDEP 8-hour ozone maintenance plan addresses the components of the
section 110(a)(1) 8-hour ozone maintenance plan as outlined in EPA’s
May 20, 2005 guidance.  West Virginia has requested approval of its
8-hour ozone maintenance plan for Greenbrier County, as well as
concurrent approval of two amendments to its existing 1-hour ozone
maintenance plan.

Emissions Inventory:  An emissions inventory is an itemized list of
emission estimates for sources of air pollution in a given area for a
specified time period.  WVDEP has provided a comprehensive and current
emissions inventory for NOx and VOCs.  WVDEP has chosen to use 2002 as
the base year from which it will project emissions.  The maintenance
plan also includes an explanation of the methodology used for
determining the anthropogenic (area and mobile sources) emissions.
There are no Title V point sources located in Greenbrier County, so a
2002 point source inventory was not compiled.  The inventory is based on
emissions from a typical ozone season day.  The term “typical”
refers to emissions being emitted during a typical weekday during the
months where ozone concentrations are typically the highest.

Maintenance Demonstration and Tracking Progress:  With regard to
demonstrating continued maintenance of the 8-hour ozone standard, West
Virginia projects that the total emissions from Greenbrier County will
decrease during the ten-year maintenance period.  WVDEP has projected
emissions for 10 years from the effective date of initial designations,
or 2014.  In 2002, the total anthropogenic emissions in Greenbrier
County were 7.7 tons/ozone season day for VOCs and 7.4 tons/ozone season
day for NOx.  The projected 2014 anthropogenic emissions from Greenbrier
County are 7.0 tons/ozone season day for VOCs and 4.9 tons/ozone season
day for NOx.  As such, the plan demonstrates that, from an emissions
projections standpoint, emissions are projected to decrease.

It is important to note that the formation of ozone is dependent on a
number of variables which cannot be estimated through emissions growth
and reduction calculations.  A few of these variables include weather
and the transport of ozone precursors from outside the maintenance area.
 In the Section 110(a)(1) maintenance plan, WVDEP had indicated that the
state will track the progress of the maintenance plan by updating the
emissions inventory for Greenbrier County approximately every three
years. The emissions inventory update will include point, area, and
mobile emissions.  Information from these future updates will be
compared with the projected growth estimates for the 2002 base inventory
data to track maintenance of the standard.

Ambient Monitoring:  With regard to the ambient air monitoring component
of the maintenance plan, West Virginia commits to continue operating air
quality monitoring stations in accordance with 40 CFR Part 58 throughout
the maintenance period to verify maintenance of the 8-hour ozone
standard, and will submit quality-assured ozone data to EPA through the
AIRS system.

Contingency Measures:   EPA interprets Section 110(a)(1) of the CAA to
require that the state develop a contingency plan that will ensure that
any violation of a NAAQS is promptly corrected.  The purposes of the
contingency measures, as outlined in West Virginia’s maintenance plan,
is to accordingly select and adopt one or more measures outlined in the
maintenance plan so as to assure continued attainment in the event that
a violation of the ozone NAAQS is measured.  Violation of the 8-hour
ozone standard would trigger one or more of the control measures
outlined in the plan.

Approval of two amendments to West Virginia’s existing 1-hour
maintenance plan has also been requested by WVDEP.  Section 175A(b)
requires that maintenance plans be updated.  The 1-hour maintenance plan
for Greenbrier County extends to 2005, but no update has been developed.
West Virginia identifies the most important reason for this being that
available resources are being devoted to attainment and maintenance of
the 8-hour standard since the 8-hour standard is considered by the State
to be more protective than the former 1-hour standard upon which the
current maintenance plan is based.  As such, West Virginia is amending
this existing maintenance plan, which is codified at 40 CFR 52.2420(e),
for the Greenbrier County 1-hour maintenance area by removing the
State’s obligation to submit a maintenance plan for the 1-hour NAAQS
eight years after approval of the initial 1-hour maintenance plan, and
is requesting approval of these amendments.

The WVDEP is requesting approval of the section 110(a)(1) 8-hour ozone
maintenance plan for Greenbrier County, West Virginia as a revision to
its SIP.  This plan demonstrates how the State intends to maintain the
8-hour NAAQS for ozone.  Additionally, WVDEP requested that pursuant to
40 CFR 51.905(e)(1), EPA concurrently approve two amendments to the
existing 1-hour ozone maintenance plan: (1) removal of the obligation to
submit a maintenance plan for the 1-hour NAAQS 8 years after approval of
the initial 1-hour maintenance plan; and (2) removal of the State’s
obligation to implement contingency measures upon a violation of the
1-hour NAAQS.  West Virginia’s SIP submittal meets the CAA
requirements for SIP submittals.

III.   Proposed Action

EPA's review of this material indicates that West Virginia has addressed
the components of a maintenance plan pursuant to EPA’s May 20, 2005
guidance.  EPA is proposing to approve the West Virginia SIP revision
for Greenbrier County, which was submitted on November 29, 2006. EPA is
soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered before taking final action.

IV.  Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
proposed action is not a "significant regulatory action" and therefore
is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget.  For
this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
"Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use"  (66 Fed. Reg. 28355 (May 22, 2001)).  This action
merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and
imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this proposed rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Because this rule proposes to approve pre-existing requirements under
state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4).  This proposed
rule also does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999),
because it merely proposes to approve a state rule implementing a
Federal requirement, and does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA.  This
proposed rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it approves a state rule implementing a Federal
standard.

In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA(s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA.  In this context, in
the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use
voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove
a SIP submission for failure to use VCS.  It would thus be inconsistent
with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use
VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions
of the CAA.  Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do
not apply.  As required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR
4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing this proposed rule, EPA has taken
the necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for affected
conduct.  EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March
15, 1988) by examining the takings implications of the rule in
accordance with the (Attorney General(s Supplemental Guidelines for the
Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings( issued under
the executive order.

This action proposing approval of  the section 110(a)(1) 8-hour Ozone
Maintenance Plan for Greenbrier County, West Virginia, and for
concurrent approval of two amendments to the existing 1-hour ozone
maintenance plan does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Reporting and Recordkeeping, Volatile organic compounds.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

___________________________          		 __________/s/__________________

Dated:   October 29, 2007
Donald S. Welsh,

Regional Administrator,

Region III.

 PAGE

 PAGE  10


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13288-13289]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05120]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP14-86-000]

Vermont Gas Systems, Inc.; Notice of Application

    Take notice that on February 19, 2014, Vermont Gas Systems Inc.
(VGS) filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an
application under section 7(f) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) requesting
a service area determination within which it may enlarge or expand its
natural gas distribution facilities without further Commission
authorization. VGS also requests: (i) A finding that VGS qualifies as a
local distribution company (LDC) for purposes of Section 311 of the
Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA); (ii) a waiver of the
Commission's accounting and reporting requirements and other regulatory
requirements ordinarily applicable to natural gas companies under the
NGA and NGPA; (iii) any other relief as deemed appropriate; and (iv)
expedited treatment of its Application.
    VGS is expanding its distribution facilities in Vermont and has
been asked to provide natural gas service to International Paper at its
Ticonderoga Mill in Ticonderoga County, New York. The total length of
pipeline proposed to be constructed in New York is 1,600 feet of low
pressure distribution line from the New York/Vermont state line to the
Ticonderoga Mill. VGS's application is on file with the Commission and
open to public inspection. This filing is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or
TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions regarding the application should be directed to
Eileen Simollardes, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs, Vermont Gas
Systems Inc., 85

Swift Street, South Burlington, VT 05403, by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or to Elizabeth W. Whittle,
Nixon Peabody, LLP, 401 Ninth Street NW., Suite 900, Washington, DC
20004, by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit seven copies of filings made in the proceeding with the
Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other
party. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commentors will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentors will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and seven copies of the protest or intervention to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on March 12, 2014.

    Dated: February 28, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-05120 Filed 3-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 173 (Friday, September 6, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46945-46946]
[FR Doc No: 2019-19275]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2997-031]

South Sutter Water District; Notice of Application Accepted for
Filing and Soliciting Motions To Intervene and Protests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Major, new license.
    b. Project No.: P-2997-031.
    c. Date filed: July 1, 2019.
    d. Applicant: South Sutter Water District.
    e. Name of Project: Camp Far West Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The existing hydroelectric project is located on the
Bear River in Yuba, Nevada, and Placer Counties, California. The
project, with the proposed project boundary modifications, would occupy
a total of 2,674 acres. No federal or tribal lands occur within or
adjacent to the project boundary or along the Bear River downstream of
the project.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Brad Arnold, General Manager, South
Sutter Water District, 2464 Pacific Avenue, Trowbridge, California
95659.
    i. FERC Contact: Quinn Emmering,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing motions to intervene and protests and
requests for cooperating agency status: 60 days from the issuance date
of this notice.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
motions to intervene and protests and requests for cooperating agency
status using the Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or
(202) 502-8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper
copy to: Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should
include docket number P-2997-031.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency.
    k. This application has been accepted, but is not ready for
environmental analysis at this time.
    l. Project Description: The existing Camp Far West Hydroelectric
Project operates to primarily provide water during the irrigation
season, generate power, and meet streamflow requirements for the Bear
River. The existing project includes: (1) A 185-foot-high, 40-foot-
wide, 2,070-foot-long, zoned, earth-filled main dam; (2) a 45-foot-
high, 20-foot-wide, 1,060-foot-long, earth-filled south wing dam; (3) a
25-foot-high, 20-foot-wide, 1,460-foot-long, earth-filled north wing
dam; (4) a 15-foot-high, 20-foot-wide, 1,450-foot-long, earth-filled
dike; (5) a 1,886-acre

reservoir with a gross storage capacity of about 93,737 acre-feet at
the normal maximum water surface elevation (NMWSE) of 300 feet; (6) an
overflow spillway with a 15-foot-wide concrete approach apron, 300-
foot-long ungated, ogee-type concrete structure, and a 77-foot-long
downstream concrete chute with concrete sidewalls; (7) a 1,200-foot-
long, unlined, rock channel that carries spill downstream to the Bear
River; (8) a 22-foot-high, concrete, power intake tower with openings
on three sides protected by steel trashracks; (9) a 760-foot-long, 8-
foot-diameter concrete tunnel through the left abutment of the main dam
that conveys water from the power intake to the powerhouse; (10) a
steel-reinforced, concrete powerhouse with a 6.8-megawatt, vertical-
shaft, Francis-type turbine, which discharges to the Bear River at the
base of the main dam; (11) a 25-foot-4-inch-high, concrete, vertical
intake tower with openings on three sides protected by steel trashracks
that receives water for the outlet works; (12) a 350-foot-long, 48-
inch-diameter steel pipe that conveys water from the intake structure
to a valve chamber for the outlet works; (13) a 400-foot-long, 7.5-
foot-diameter concrete-lined horseshoe tunnel that connects to the
valve chamber; (14) a 48-inch-diameter, outlet valve with a 500-cubic-
feet-per-second release capacity at NMWSE on the downstream face of the
main dam that discharges directly into the Bear River; (15) a
switchyard adjacent to the powerhouse; (16) two recreation areas with
campgrounds, day-use areas, boat ramps, restrooms, and sewage holding
ponds; (17) a recreational water system that includes two pumps in the
reservoir that deliver water to a treatment facility that is piped to a
60,000-gallon storage tank to supply water to recreation facilities.
The estimated average annual generation (2010 to 2017) is 22,637
megawatt-hours.
    South Sutter Water District proposes to: (1) Raise the NMWSE of the
project reservoir by 5 feet from an elevation of 300 feet to an
elevation of 305 feet; (2) raise the existing spillway crest from an
elevation of 300 feet to an elevation of 305 feet to accommodate the
proposed pool raise; (3) replace and restore several recreation
facilities; (4) add an existing 0.25-mile road as a primary project
road to access the powerhouse and switchyard; and (5) modify the
project boundary to account for the removal of the 1.9-mile-long
transmission line from the license in 1991, corrections based on
current project operation and maintenance, and changes under the
category of a contour 20 feet above the 300-feet NMWSE or proximity of
200-horizontal-feet from the 300-foot NMWSE.
    m. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link.
Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket
number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item h above.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
    n. Anyone may submit a protest or a motion to intervene in
accordance with the requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18
CFR 385.210, 385.211, and 385.214. In determining the appropriate
action to take, the Commission will consider all protests filed, but
only those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with the
Commission's Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any protests
or motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
deadline date for the particular application.
    All filings must (1) bear in all capital letters the title PROTEST
or MOTION TO INTERVENE; (2) set forth in the heading the name of the
applicant and the project number of the application to which the filing
responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone number of the
person protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise comply with the
requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. Agencies may obtain
copies of the application directly from the applicant. A copy of any
protest or motion to intervene must be served upon each representative
of the applicant specified in the particular application.
    o. Procedural schedule: The application will be processed according
to the following schedule. Revisions to the schedule will be made as
appropriate.

Deadline for Filing Motions to Intervene and Protests and Requests for
Cooperating Agency Status--October 29, 2019
Commission issues Scoping Document 1--January 2020
Scoping Comments due--February 2020
Commission issues Request for Additional Information (if necessary)--
March 2020
Commission issues Scoping Document 2 (if necessary)--April 2020
Commission issues Notice of Ready for Environmental Analysis--April
2020
Commission issues EA, Draft EA, or Draft EIS--October 2020
Comments on EA, Draft EA, or Draft EIS due--November 2020
Commission issues Final EA or Final EIS--February 2021

    Dated: August 30, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-19275 Filed 9-5-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P