[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 93 (Wednesday, May 13, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28548-28549]
[FR Doc No: 2020-09915]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2020-0241; FRL-10009-38-Region 7]

Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From
Lithographic and Letterpress Printing Operations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing
approval of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by
Missouri on January 14, 2019. Missouri requests that EPA approve into
Missouri's SIP revisions to its rule related to control of emissions
from lithographic and letterpress printing operations. The revisions
remove the unnecessary use of restrictive words; add, replace and
revise terms and definitions to match SIP-approved terms and
definitions in Missouri's rule Definitions and Common Reference Tables;
add a new printing category to the rule that provides consistency with
the St. Louis area counterpart rule; and make other changes that are
administrative in nature. The EPA's proposed approval of this rule
revision is being done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean
Air Act (CAA).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 12, 2020.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2020-0241 to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
No. for this rulemaking. Comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Written
Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob Webber, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Permitting and Standards Branch, 11201
Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number (913) 551-
7251; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Written Comments

    Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2020-
0241, at https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

II. What is being addressed in this document?

    The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to 10 Code of State
Regulation (CSR) 10 CSR 10-2.340 Control of Emissions from Lithographic
Printing Facilities, in the Missouri SIP. Missouri made several
revisions to the rule. These revisions are described in detail in the
technical support document (TSD) included in the docket for this
document.
    Missouri received ten comments from EPA during the comment period.
Missouri responded to all ten comments, as noted in the State
submission included in the docket for this action. Missouri responded
to EPA's comments and, as described in the TSD for this action, amended
the rule in response to some of EPA's comments.
    Therefore, the EPA is proposing to approve the revisions to this
rule because it will not have a negative impact on air quality.

III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?

    The State submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
State provided public notice on this SIP revision from June 25, 2018 to
August 2, 2018 and received ten comments on this rulemaking. As
explained in the TSD for this rule, Missouri adequately responded to
the comments. As explained above, the revision meets the substantive
SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and implementing
regulations.

IV. What action is the EPA taking?

    The EPA is proposing to approve Missouri's request to revise 10 CSR
10-2.340. The EPA is soliciting comment on the substantive and
administrative revisions detailed in this proposal and the TSD. The EPA
is not soliciting comment on existing rule text that has been
previously approved by the EPA into the SIP. Final rulemaking will
occur after consideration of any comments.

V. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, the EPA is proposing to include regulatory text
in an EPA final rule that includes incorporation by reference. In

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference the Missouri Regulation described in the
proposed amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available
through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 7 Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.

    Dated: May 5, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart-AA Missouri

0
2. In Sec.  52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the title and the entry for ``10-2.340'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.1320  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c)* * *

                                        EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      State
   Missouri  citation             Title             effective      EPA approval date           Explanation
                                                      date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Chapter 2--Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Kansas City Metropolitan Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10-2.340................  Control of Emissions          1/30/19  [Date of publication
                           From Lithographic                      of the final rule in
                           and Letterpress                        the Federal
                           Printing Operations.                   Register], [Federal
                                                                  Register citation of
                                                                  the final rule].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2020-09915 Filed 5-12-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60356-60357]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23830]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-70502; File No. SR-OCC-2013-13]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation;
Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Use of Manual
Signatures, Reduction of Segregated Long Positions in Accounts With
Aggregated Long Positions, Requirements To Be Physically Present, and
Other Technical Changes to OCC's By-Laws and Rules To Better Reflect
Current Operational Practices

September 25, 2013.

I. Introduction

    On August 5, 2013, The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change SR-OCC-2013-13 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\2\ The proposed rule change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on August 22, 2013.\3\ The Commission received no
comment letters. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is
granting approval of the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Exchange Act Release No. 34-70225 (August 16, 2013), 78 FR
52227 (August 22, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description

    OCC is amending a number of provisions in its By-Laws and Rules to
update and better reflect OCC's current operational practices.
    First, OCC is amending certain rules to remove references to manual
signatures. OCC is removing references to manual signatures within Rule
201 because OCC has adopted and implemented electronic processes and
controls within its clearance and settlement systems to allow
authorized individuals to electronically verify and validate
information such as trade data and banking instructions.\4\ Similarly,
OCC is amending Rule 202 to remove certain references to manual
signatures on certain documents (e.g. certificates, checks, receipts,
and orders) but will continue to require clearing members to provide
OCC with a list of individuals authorized to act on behalf of a
clearing member, who will in turn be provided with appropriate
electronic access to its clearance and settlement systems.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See OCC Rule 205, which requires clearing members to
electronically submit items to OCC, and Rule 212, which allows OCC
to assign clearing members access codes for electronic data entry.
    \5\ OCC will also make conforming changes to the forms required
by OCC to list the individuals authorized to act on behalf of a
clearing member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, OCC is amending Rule 611(c) to better reflect the current
practice that, in the event of a closing transaction or exercise in an
account with aggregate long positions, segregated long positions are
reduced before unsegregated long positions, and that clearing members
may not choose an alternative reduction method.
    Third, in order to better reflect technological advancements as
well as the decentralized operational structures and remote access
adopted to address business continuity and disaster recovery, OCC is
amending Rule 201 which currently requires that an authorized
representative of a clearing member be present in such clearing
member's office during specific hours each day. Instead, OCC will
require an authorized representative of a clearing member to be
available during such times as OCC may specify from time to

time. OCC is also amending Rule 204 to add Rule 204.01 in order to
clarify that, each clearing member shall be deemed to have designated
OCC's primary processing facility (or, if in operation, OCC's back-up
processing) as the office through which it shall clear confirmed trades
and otherwise conduct all of its business with OCC on any given day.
    Fourth, OCC is amending Rules 207, 208, and 611(b) to reflect
changes to the names of, information contained within, and manner in
which clearing members may amend various reports. Additional amendments
are being made to Rule 611(b) to clarify that clearing members may
electronically submit instructions to OCC regarding their segregated
long positions.
    Fifth, OCC is amending Articles I and VI of the By-Laws as well as
Rule 801 in order to remove references to the clearing international
transactions and the International Clearing System, a system which is
now dormant. OCC is further amending Article VI of the By-Laws and Rule
801 to remove reference to XMI index options, which are no longer
traded. An additional amendment is being made to Rule 801 so that OCC,
not OCC's Board of Directors, may choose exercise notices that are not
eligible for late processing.
    Finally, OCC will add language to Rule 211.01 to reflect that OCC
satisfies the notification requirements of Rule 211 to provide notice
of rule changes to clearing members and other registered clearing
agencies by posting proposed rule change filings on OCC's Web site.

III. Discussion

    Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act \6\ directs the Commission to
approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it
finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements
of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such
organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \7\ requires that the
rules of a clearing agency that is registered with the Commission be
designed to, among other things, promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities transactions, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a national system for the
prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities
transactions, and in general, to protect investors and the public
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that the rule change is consistent with
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.\8\ Advances in technology and certain
regulatory changes have made certain requirements within OCC's Rules
and By-Laws unnecessary. Therefore, by updating OCC Rules and By-Laws
so that they are better tailored to the current operational and
technological environment in which OCC and its clearing members operate
and by eliminating those provisions that may impose unnecessary costs
and inefficiencies related to outdated processing and staffing, the
rule change should help promote the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions and remove impediments to the
national system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in
particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \9\ and the
rules and regulations thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\10\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-OCC-2013-13) be and
hereby is approved.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \11\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

    For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-23830 Filed 9-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 19, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10100-10101]
[FR Doc No: 2019-05133]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2019-N-0549]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Medical Devices; Use of Symbols in Labeling--Glossary
to Support the Use of Symbols in Labeling

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, and
to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the notice. This
notice solicits comments on product labeling regulations to explicitly
allow for the optional inclusion of graphical representations of
information, or symbols, in labeling (including labels) without
adjacent explanatory text (referred to in this document as ``stand-
alone symbols'') if certain requirements are met.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by May 20, 2019.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be considered. Electronic comments
must be submitted on or before May 20, 2019. The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of May 20, 2019. Comments received
by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are postmarked or the delivery service
acceptance receipt is on or before that date.

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2019-N-0549 for ``Use of Symbols in Labeling.'' Received comments,
those filed in a timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed in the
docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,''
publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets
Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-;2015-09-
18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amber Sanford, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice

of the proposed collection of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

Medical Devices: Use of Symbols in Labeling--Glossary To Support the
Use of Symbols in Labeling

OMB Control Number 0910-0740--Extension

    In the Federal Register of June 15, 2016 (81 FR 38911), FDA issued
a final rule revising medical device and certain biological product
labeling regulations by explicitly allowing for the optional use in
medical device labeling of stand-alone symbols established in a
Standard Development Organization (SDO)-developed standard. In
particular, FDA will allow the use of stand-alone graphical
representations of information, or symbols, in the labeling for the
medical devices, if the symbols are established in a standard developed
by an SDO as long as: (1) The standard is recognized by FDA under its
authority under section 514(c) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360d(c)) and the symbol is used according to
the specifications for use of the symbol set forth in FDA's section
514(c) recognition, or alternatively, (2) if the symbol is not included
in a standard recognized by FDA under section 514(c) of the FD&C Act or
the symbol is in a standard recognized by FDA but is not used according
to the specifications for use of the symbol set out in the FDA section
514(c) recognition, the device manufacturer otherwise determines that
the symbol is likely to be read and understood by the ordinary
individual under customary conditions of purchase and use and uses the
symbol according to the specifications for use of the symbol set forth
in the SDO-developed standard. In addition, in either case, the symbol
must be explained in a written or electronic symbols glossary that is
included in the labeling for the medical device. Furthermore, the
labeling on or within the package containing the device must bear a
prominent and conspicuous statement identifying the location of the
glossary that is written in English or, in the case of articles
distributed solely in Puerto Rico or in a Territory where the
predominant language is one other than English, the predominant
language may be used. The use of such symbols must also comply with
other applicable labeling requirements of the FD&C Act, such as section
502(a) and (f) (21 U.S.C. 352(a) and (f)).
    The respondents for this collection of information are domestic and
foreign device manufacturers who plan to use stand-alone symbols on the
labels and/or labeling for their devices marketed in the United States.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                                     Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of
                              Activity                                  Number of      responses per     Total annual    Average burden    Total hours
                                                                       respondents       respondent       responses       per response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Glossary...........................................................           3,000                1            3,000                1            3,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

                                               Table 2--Estimated Annual Third-Party Disclosure Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of
                              Activity                                  Number of     disclosures per    Total annual    Average burden    Total hours
                                                                       respondents       respondent      disclosures      per response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Glossary...........................................................           3,000                1            3,000                4           12,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    The estimated burden is based on the data in a similar collection
for recommended glossary and educational outreach approved under OMB
control number 0910-0553 (``Use of Symbols on Labels and in Labeling of
In Vitro Diagnostic Devices Intended for Professional Use''). As such,
the PRA also covers the requirements of the final rule to submit the
symbols glossary to FDA in otherwise required submissions during the
premarket review process and to disclose it to third parties in
otherwise required device labeling, which means adding to such
submission or labeling a compiled listing of each SDO-established
symbol used in the labeling for the device; the title and designation
number of the SDO-developed standard containing the symbol; and the
title of the symbol and its reference number, if any, in the standard;
and the meaning or explanatory text for the symbol as provided in the
FDA recognition or, if FDA has not recognized the standard or portion
of the standard in which the symbol is located or the symbol is used
not in accordance with the specifications for use of the symbol set out
in the FDA section 514(c) recognition, the explanatory text as provided
in the standard.
    Based on a review of the information collection since our last
request for OMB approval, we have made no adjustments to our burden
estimate.

    Dated: March 14, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-05133 Filed 3-18-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 25, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50349-50353]
[FR Doc No: 2019-20682]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 121

[Docket No.: FAA-2019-0770; Notice No. 19-10]
RIN 2120-AL41

Flight Attendant Duty Period Limitations and Rest Requirements

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action arises out of a statutory mandate in the FAA
Reauthorization Act of 2018 that requires the FAA to increase the
minimum rest period for flight attendants in domestic, flag, and
supplemental operations who are scheduled for a duty period of 14 hours
or less. Consistent with the statutory mandate, the FAA plans to amend
its regulations to ensure that flight attendants scheduled to a duty
period of 14 hours or less are given a scheduled rest period of at
least 10 consecutive hours and that the rest period is not reduced
under any circumstances. This document seeks input from the public to
obtain more information about current domestic, flag, and supplemental
operations with flight attendants and the potential benefits and costs
to inform the rulemaking.

DATES: Send comments on or before November 12, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number [Insert docket
number from heading] using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.

     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system
of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions concerning
this ANPRM, contact Daniel T. Ronneberg, Part 121 Air Carrier
Operations, Air Transportation Division, AFS-220, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA seeks public comment on the areas
outlined within this ANPRM. In particular, the FAA seeks comments on
how the FAA could implement a rulemaking to address the requirement of
section 335(a) of the Federal Aviation Administration Reauthorization
Act of 2018 (FAARA 2018) in a manner that maximizes benefits and
minimizes costs. In some areas of this ANPRM, the FAA requests specific
information. Whenever possible, please provide citations and copies of
any relevant studies or reports on which you rely, including benefit
and cost data as well as any additional data that supports your
comment. Please include the identifying number of the specific
question(s) to which you are responding. The FAA will use comments to
inform the rulemaking.

I. Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator.
    Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in detail the scope of
the Agency's authority. Section 44701(a)(4) requires the Administrator
to promulgate regulations in the interest of safety for the ``maximum
hours or periods of service of airmen and other employees of air
carriers.'' Section 44701(a)(5) requires the Administrator to
promulgate ``regulations and minimum standards for other practices,
methods, and procedure that the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce and national security.'' In addition, 49 U.S.C.
44701(d)(1)(A) states that the Administrator, when prescribing safety
regulations, must consider ``the duty of an air carrier to provide
service with the highest possible degree of safety in the public
interest.''

II. Executive Summary

    The purpose of this advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM)
is to seek comments on the impact of increasing the rest period
required for flight attendants who serve in operations conducted under
14 CFR part 121 when those flight attendants are scheduled for a duty
period of 14 hours or less. These comments will inform the FAA's
development of the rule implementing these changes.
    Consistent with section 335(a) of the FAARA 2018, the FAA plans to
amend part 121 regulations that apply to flight attendants who are
scheduled for a duty period of 14 hours or less. Section 335(a)
requires the regulations reflect that such flight attendants have a
scheduled rest period of at least 10 consecutive hours that cannot be
reduced under any circumstances. The FAA intends this ANPRM to result
in information to further the FAA's rulemaking effort, including
estimates of the benefits and costs.

III. Background

    A flight attendant under 14 CFR part 121 is defined as an
individual, other than a flightcrew member,\1\ who is assigned by a
certificate holder conducting domestic, flag, or supplemental
operations to duty in an aircraft during flight time and whose duties
include but are not necessarily limited to cabin-safety-related
responsibilities.\2\ Section 121.391 specifies the minimum number of
flight attendants required on board a flight, based on maximum payload
capacity and seating capacity, for certificate holders conducting
passenger-carrying operations under part 121.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ A ``flightcrew member'' is a pilot, flight engineer, or
flight navigator assigned to duty in an aircraft during flight time.
14 CFR 1.1.
    \2\ 14 CFR 121.467(a).
    \3\ 14 CFR 121.391 provides that a certificate holder may,
however, use more than the required number of flight attendants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any person serving as a flight attendant in part 121 operations
must complete the training and qualification requirements of part 121
subparts N and O.\4\ All newly hired flight attendants must complete
basic indoctrination training, crewmember emergency training, and
initial and/or transition training on each type aircraft on which the
flight attendant will be qualified to serve as a crewmember.
Additionally, flight attendants must complete operating experience on
each group of aircraft for which they will be qualified. Flight
attendants must also continue to successfully complete annual recurrent
training. These categories of training and qualification events include
specific programmed hours, as well as airplane type specific knowledge
and skill requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 14 CFR 121.392.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, certificate holders conducting passenger-carrying
domestic, flag, and supplemental operations must fulfill the flight
attendant duty period limitations and rest requirements in 14 CFR
121.467. Section 121.467(b) provides generally that a flight attendant
scheduled to a duty period of 14 hours or less must be given a
scheduled rest period of at least nine consecutive hours. This rest
period must occur between the completion of the scheduled duty period
and the commencement of the subsequent duty period. The certificate
holder may schedule or reduce the rest period to eight consecutive
hours if the certificate holder provides a subsequent rest period of at
least 10 consecutive hours that is scheduled to begin no later than 24
hours after the beginning of the reduced rest period.
    Section 335(a) of the FAARA 2018 requires the FAA to ``modify the
final rule'' \5\ relating to flight attendant duty period limitations
and rest requirements to ``ensure that--(A) a flight attendant
scheduled to a duty period of 14 hours or less is given a scheduled
rest period of at least 10 consecutive hours; and (B) the rest period
is not reduced under any circumstances.'' This mandate requires the FAA
to increase the amount of rest that certificate holders operating under
part 121 must provide to flight attendants scheduled to a duty period
of

14 hours or less, and also requires the FAA to remove the flexibility
to reduce the rest period. Amending Sec.  121.467 to fulfill the
requirements of section 335(a) requires the FAA to complete economic
analyses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The final rule implementing flight attendant duty period
limitations and rest requirements is Flight Attendant Duty Period
Limitations and Rest Requirements. The FAA notes that the correct
Federal Register citation for this final rule is 59 FR 94-20372
(Aug. 19, 1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA believes that the economic impact associated with the
changes Section 335(a) of the FAARA 2018 requires may cause a
subsequently published notice of proposed rulemaking or final rule to
be considered economically significant for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866. To be sensitive to economic impact and to provide
additional procedural protections and avenues for public participation,
Section 12.b. of DOT Order 2100.6, Policies and Procedures for
Rulemakings, directs DOT agencies to publish an ANPRM in the Federal
Register prior to proposing an economically significant rule. In
accordance with that order, and to better inform the FAA's analysis and
rulemaking development, this ANPRM solicits public input on the
regulatory impact of the statutorily-mandated changes to flight
attendant duty and rest requirements codified in Section 335(a) of the
FAARA 2018.

IV. Questions Concerning the Rulemaking

    Changes to Federal regulations must undergo economic analyses. The
FAA completes such analyses in accordance with Executive Order 12866
``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993), Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-4, Regulatory Analysis (Sept.
17, 2003) and the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601, et
seq. To ensure the FAA has adequate information to complete thorough
analyses based on relevant, current information, the FAA requests
information and data to develop the necessary regulatory impact
analyses to quantify the economic impacts of section 335(a) of FAARA
2018. The FAA seeks responses to the questions below from the public to
help inform the development of the rulemaking and its economic impact.
    The FAA requests that responses to the following questions include
quantitative information and data where possible. The FAA seeks all
information pertinent to assessing the full impacts of implementing
section 335(a). The FAA will use this information and data to develop
analyses and further rulemaking that the FAA will make available to the
public for comment.

Confidential Business Information

    Confidential Business Information (CBI) is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by
its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552),
CBI is exempt from public disclosure. If your comments responsive to
this ANPRM contain commercial or financial information that is
customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as private, and
that is relevant or responsive to this ANPRM, it is important that you
clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page
of your submission containing CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat
such marked submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will
not be placed in the public docket of this ANPRM. Submissions
containing CBI should be sent to Daniel T. Ronneberg, Part 121 Air
Carrier Operations, Air Transportation Division, AFS-220, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC
20591; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Any
commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated
as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.
    Questions for the Public: The FAA is required to ensure that flight
attendants under part 121 who are scheduled to a duty period of 14
hours or less be given a scheduled rest period of at least 10
consecutive hours that cannot be reduced under any circumstances. The
FAA invites input from the public as follows--
    A.1 The FAA requests information on the safety benefits of
implementing section 335(a). Specifically, the FAA requests data and
studies on the safety effects, including potential risks and
consequences, of flight attendant fatigue on civil aviation and the
incremental safety benefits of the rest requirements in section 335(a).
Please provide information to quantify annual benefits to the public
and industry, including flight attendants and flightcrew members. This
information will help the FAA estimate safety benefits in the
regulatory impact analysis of this rulemaking.
    A2. The FAA requests estimates for initial and recurring annual
costs that certificate holders conducting operations under part 121
will incur in implementing the requirements of section 335(a). Please
provide estimates in the following table format, assuming the
compliance date begins in year 1.

                                      A2. Table of Impacts--Additional Flight Attendant Costs, Hours and New Hires
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Year
              Impact category              -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                1          2          3          4          5          6          7          8          9          10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial implementation costs ($) \6\:
     Software/reprogramming cost
     New hire cost
     Training cost
     Travel, lodging & per diem
Recurring costs ($) *:
     Programming cost \7\
     New hire turnover cost \8\
     Training cost
     Travel, lodging & per diem
Number of additional flight attendant
 hours:
     Flight time \9\
     Duty time \10\
        [cir] Deadhead transportation as
         passenger \11\
        [cir]
     Reserve availability period
     \12\
Number of additional flight attendant
 hires (new and turnover) \13\
Other impacts (including additional
 operational costs or effects to
 operations) \14\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to the previous questions and table, the following
questions request additional information and data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Initial implementation costs may include: Additional flight
attendant hires and turnover hires; background checks and
onboarding; initial and recurring training; travel, lodging, and per
diem; other additional operational costs to comply with section
335(a). Please itemize. Please consider existing regulatory
compliance and company practices when estimating additional costs
associated with hiring additional flight attendants and implementing
section 335(a), such as security threat assessments and drug and
alcohol screening.
    \7\ Programming costs such as software modifications to include
the proposed flight attendant rest requirement.
    \8\ ``New hire turnover costs'' means the costs associated to
new hire attrition.
    \9\ The FAA assumes that a flight attendant's hourly wage is
calculated differently for flight time as a subset of the duty
period. In this context, this ANPRM uses the definition for ``flight
time'' that applies to pilots: time that commences when an aircraft
moves under its own power for the purpose of flight and ends when
the aircraft comes to rest after landing. 14 CFR 1.1.
    \10\ ``Duty time'' is the period of elapsed time between
reporting for an assignment involving flight time and release from
that assignment by the certificate holder conducting domestic, flag,
or supplemental operations. 14 CFR 121.467(a).
    \11\ In this context, this ANPRM uses the definition for
``deadhead transportation'' that applies to pilots: Transportation
of a flightcrew member as a passenger or non-operating flightcrew
member, by any mode of transportation, as required by a certificate
holder, excluding transportation to or from a suitable
accommodation. 14 CFR 117.3.
    \12\ This ANPRM uses the term ``reserve availability period'' in
this context to refer to a period of time in which the certificate
holder requires a flight attendant to be available to receive an
assignment for a duty period. 14 CFR 1.1.
    \13\ Include what is necessary to maintain the current level of
flight operations and what is necessary for the level of future
flight operations expected over a 10-year period.
    \14\ Examples of other impacts include additional transportation
costs or impact to flight times etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A3. What is the average flight attendant hourly wage for reserve
time, flight time, and duty time operations?
    A4. What is the minimum number of flight attendant guaranteed
reserve hours or guaranteed reserve pay?
    A5. What is the average initial and recurring flight attendant
training cost? Please describe what is included in training costs
(e.g., instructor and flight attendant time, supplies, etc.).
    A6. What is the average cost to hire and onboard a new flight
attendant, not including wages or training?
    A7. Do you anticipate needing to hire additional flight attendants
to implement section 335(a)? If so, how long will it take to initially
hire additional flight attendants that may be needed to implement
section 335(a) to maintain your current level of flight operations?
Please quantify in months.
    A8. What are the costs of modifying scheduling software and
reprogramming any related scheduling management systems? What is
included in this estimate?
    A9. Based on your current preparation to comply with the provisions
of section 335(a), what type and percentage of your operations have
already incurred costs? What is the basis for these costs?
    A10. How many affected flight attendants do you currently employ?
Please provide data for the previous three years.
    A11. Prior to the required change in the rest requirement, how many
flight attendants did you expect to hire? Please provide data for the
next three years.
    A12. How many affected flight attendants have recently retired?
Please provide data for the previous three years. If available, provide
projected attrition rates for the next three years.
    A13. Please provide recommendations and options to minimize the
costs of compliance and implementation of section 335(a).
    A14. Please provide any additional information and data that you
believe would be useful to the FAA regarding the impacts of
implementing section 335(a).
    A15. Are there any specific issues related to small air carriers
with domestic, flag, and supplemental operations with flight attendants
that FAA should consider? Would this rule have a disproportionate
economic impact on small entities?

V. Regulatory Requirements and Executive Order Determinations

    The FAA will address the following requirements in future flight
attendant duty period limitations and rest requirements rulemakings.
Please provide comments that would assist the FAA in its consideration
and analyses of these requirements.

A. Executive Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, and DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures

    The FAA would consider a rulemaking that would address section
335(a) of FAARA 2018 as a significant regulatory action under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 that would be reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). The rulemaking would also be a significant
regulatory action under DOT Order 2100.6 ``Policies and Procedures for
Rulemakings,'' issued by the Department of Transportation on December
20, 2018.
    Executive Orders 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' 58 FR
51735 (Oct. 4, 1993), and 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review,'' 76 FR 3821 (Jan. 21, 2011), require agencies to regulate in
the ``most cost-effective manner,'' to make a ``reasoned determination
that the benefits of the intended regulation justify its costs,'' and
to develop regulations that ``impose the least burden on society.''
Executive Order 13610, ``Identifying and Reducing Regulatory Burdens,''
77 FR 28469 (May 14, 2012), urges agencies to conduct retrospective
analyses of existing rules to examine whether they remain justified and
whether they should be modified or streamlined in light of changed
circumstances, including the rise of new technologies.
    Additionally, Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13610 require
agencies to provide a meaningful opportunity for public participation.
Accordingly, FAA invites comments on these considerations, including
any cost or benefit figures or factors, alternative approaches, and
relevant scientific, technical and economic data.

B. Executive Order 13771

    This action is not subject to the requirements of Executive Order
13771 because it is an advance notice of proposed rulemaking.

C. Executive Order 13132

    Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' 64 FR 43255 (Aug. 10, 1999),
requires agencies to assure meaningful and timely input by State and
local officials in the development of regulatory policies that may have
``substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' FAA
invites State and local governments with an interest in this ANPRM to
comment on any effect that may result from implementation of section
335(a) of FAARA 2018.

D. Executive Order 13175

    Consistent with Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,'' and FAA Order 1210.20,
``American Indian and Alaska Native Tribal Consultation Policy and
Procedures,'' the FAA ensures that Federally Recognized Tribes (Tribes)
are given the opportunity to provide meaningful and timely input
regarding proposed Federal actions that have the potential to uniquely
or significantly affect their respective Tribes. At this point, the FAA
has not identified any unique or significant effects, environmental or
otherwise, on tribes resulting from this ANPRM.

E. Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive Order 13272, and DOT Policies
and Procedures

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601, et
seq., FAA must consider whether a rulemaking would have a ``significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.'' ``Small
entities'' include small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that
are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations under 50,000.
    The FAA would develop any future rulemaking in accordance with
Executive Order 13272, ``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking,'' 68 FR 7990 (Feb. 19, 2003), and DOT's procedures
and policies to promote compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act
to ensure that potential impacts on small entities of a regulatory
action are properly considered.

F. Paperwork Reduction Act

    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., 5 CFR 1320.8(d) requires that FAA provide interested members of
the public and affected agencies an opportunity to comment on
information collection and recordkeeping requests. While the purpose of
this ANPRM is to solicit comments, this action does not impose new
information collection requirements as defined in 14 CFR part 1320. The
FAA will consider how a future rulemaking that would address section
335(a) of FAARA 2018 would affect current information collection and
recordkeeping requests.

G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
governs the issuance of Federal regulations that require unfunded
mandates. An unfunded mandate is a regulation that requires a state,
local, or tribal government or the private sector to incur direct costs
without the Federal government having first provided the funds to pay
those costs. The FAA will need to determine if a rulemaking to address
section 335(a) of the FAARA 2018 would result in costs of $155 million
or more, adjusted for inflation, to either state, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector in any one
year.

H. National Environmental Policy Act

    The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4375,
requires that Federal agencies analyze proposed actions to determine
whether the action will have a significant impact on the human
environment. The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations
require Federal agencies to conduct an environmental review considering
(1) the need for the proposed action, (2) alternatives to the proposed
action, (3) probable environmental impacts of the proposed action and
alternatives, and (4) the agencies and persons consulted during the
consideration process. See 40 CFR 1508.9(b). FAA welcomes any data or
information related to environmental impacts that may result from any
future rulemaking to address section 335(a) of FAARA 2018.

I. Privacy Act

    Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the document (or signing the
document, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in
the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000, see 65 FR 19477, or
you may visit http://www.regulations.gov.

J. Executive Order 13069 and International Trade Analysis

    Under Executive Order 13609, ``Promoting International Regulatory
Cooperation,'' 77 FR 26413 (May 4, 2012), agencies must consider
whether the impacts associated with significant variations between
domestic and international regulatory approaches are unnecessary or may
impair the ability of American businesses to export and compete
internationally. In meeting shared challenges involving health, safety,
labor, security, environmental, and other issues, regulatory approaches
developed through international cooperation can provide equivalent
protection to standards developed independently while also minimizing
unnecessary differences.
    Similarly, the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, Public Law 96-39, as
amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, Public Law 103-465,
prohibits Federal agencies from establishing any standards or engaging
in related activities that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States. For purposes of these requirements,
Federal agencies may participate in the establishment of international
standards, so long as the standards have a legitimate domestic
objective, such as providing for safety, and do not operate to exclude
imports that meet this objective. The statute also requires
consideration of international standards and, where appropriate, that
they be the basis for U.S. standards. FAA welcomes any data or
information related to international impacts that may result from
future rulemaking to address section 335(a) of the FAARA 2018.

K. Executive Order 13211

    Executive Order 13211, 66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001), requires Federal
agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for any ``significant
energy action.'' Under the executive order, a ``significant energy
action'' is defined as any action by an agency (normally published in
the Federal Register) that promulgates, or is expected to lead to the
promulgation of, a final rule or regulation (including a notice of
inquiry, ANPRM, and NPRM) that (1)(i) is a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866 or any successor order and (ii) is
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy; or (2) is designated by the
Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a
significant energy action. The FAA would consider this executive order
for a future rulemaking to address section 335(a) of FAARA 2018.

    Issued in Washington, DC, under authority provided by 49 U.S.C.
106(f) and 44701(a) on September 18, 2019.
Robert C. Carty,
Deputy Executive Director, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2019-20682 Filed 9-24-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: September 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 183)]
[Notices]
[Page 57758-57759]
[DOCID:fr22se10-46]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. DI10-17-000]

Antrim Treatment Trust; Notice of Declaration of Intention and
Soliciting Comments, Protests, and/or Motions To Intervene

September 15, 2010.
    Take notice that the following application has been filed with the
Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Declaration of Intention.
    b. Docket No: DI10-17-000.
    c. Date Filed: September 9, 2010.
    d. Applicant: Antrim Treatment Trust.
    e. Name of Project: Antrim Micro-Hydropower Project.
    f. Location: The proposed Antrim Micro-Hydropower Project will be
located on an unnamed creek, tributary to Wilson Creek, near the town
of Antrim, Tioga County, Pennsylvania.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Section 23(b)(1) of the Federal Power Act, 16
U.S.C. 817(b).
    h. Applicant Contact: Bryan J. Page, BioMost, Inc. 434 Spring
Street Ext., Mars, PA 16046; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Fax: (724) 776-
0166; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. FERC Contact: Any questions on this notice should be addressed
to Henry Ecton,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or E-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, protests, and/or motions: October
15, 2010.
    All documents should be filed electronically via the Internet. See
18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. If unable to be
filed electronically, documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an
original and seven copies should be filed with: Secretary, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters,
without prior registration, using the eComment system at http://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. Please include the docket number
(DI10-17-000) on any comments, protests, and/or motions filed.
    k. Description of Project: The proposed Antrim Micro-Hydropower
Project will consist of: (1) A collection pond, containing acidic
metal-laden coal mine drainage, conveyed to a water treatment plant
through a 12-inch PVC pipe; (2) an 1,100-foot-long, 18-inch-diameter
HDPA pipe penstock from the treatment plant; (3) a powerhouse, located
on the penstock, containing a Turgo turbine with a rated output of 30
kW; (4) a 16-inch diameter, approximately 8-foot-long tailrace,
emptying into an unnamed stream; (5) a transmission line extending
approximately 1,100-feet to the treatment plant, where it will provide
power to selected components of the project; (6) a propane generator,
providing backup power for the selected components; and (7) appurtenant
facilities. The power will be used on site and the project will not be
connected to an interstate grid.
    When a Declaration of Intention is filed with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, the Federal Power Act requires the Commission to
investigate and determine if the interests of interstate or foreign
commerce would be affected by the proposed project. The Commission also
determines whether or not the project: (1) Would be located on a
navigable waterway; (2) would occupy or affect public lands or
reservations of the United States; (3) would utilize surplus water or
water power from a government dam; or (4) if applicable, has involved
or would involve any construction subsequent to 1935 that may have
increased or would increase the project's head or generating capacity,
or have otherwise significantly modified the project's pre-1935 design
or operation.
    l. Locations of the Application: Copies of this filing are on file
with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This
filing may be viewed on the Web at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. You may also
register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to
be notified via e-mail of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
or TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is also available for inspection
and reproduction at the address in item (h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene--Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents--Any filings must
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``PROTESTS'', AND/
OR ``MOTIONS TO INTERVENE'', as applicable, and the Docket Number of
the particular application to which the filing refers. A copy of any
motion to intervene must also be served upon each

representative of the Applicant specified in the particular
application.
    p. Agency Comments--Federal, state, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-23625 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: August 28, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 166)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 44308-44311]
[DOCID:fr28au09-17]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0778; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-040-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Twin Commander Aircraft Corporation
Models 690, 690A, and 690B Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Twin Commander Aircraft Corporation Models 690, 690A, and 690B
airplanes. This proposed AD would require you to inspect between the
surface of the left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH) upper wing skins and
the engine mount beam support straps for any signs of corrosion,
replace the upper steel straps with parts of improved design, and
modify both wings. This proposed AD results from reports that corrosion
was found between the mating surfaces of the wing upper skin surface
and the engine mount beam support straps. We are proposing this AD to
detect and correct corrosion on the engine mount beam support straps
and the upper wing skins, which could result in failure of the engine
mount beam support straps. This failure could lead to loss of the
engine and possible loss of control of the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 13,
2009.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this
proposed AD:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Twin Commander Aircraft, LLC, 19010 59th Drive, NE., Arlington, WA
98223, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet:
www.twincommander.com.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vince Massey, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number, ``FAA-
2009-0778; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-040-AD'' at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall
regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed
AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may
amend the proposed AD in light of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive concerning this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We have received a report that corrosion was found between the
mating surfaces of the wing upper skin surface and the engine mount
beam support straps. These straps carry engine loads from the support
beams into the upper wing skins and wing internal support structure.
Severe corrosion of the straps can lead to inability to carry engine
loads.
    This condition, if not corrected, could result in failure of the
engine mount beam support straps. This failure could lead to loss of
the engine and possible loss of control of the airplane.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed Twin Commander Aircraft LLC Alert Service Bulletin
No. 237, dated May 13, 2005. The service information describes
procedures for inspecting the surface of the LH and RH upper wing skins
and the engine mount beam support straps for any signs of corrosion,
replacing the upper steel straps with parts of improved design, and
modifying both wings.
    We have reviewed Twin Commander Aircraft Corporation Custom Kit No.
150, dated July 8, 1994. The service information describes procedures
for installing inspection access holes in the LH and RH upper wing
skins.
    We have reviewed Gulfstream American Corporation Service Bulletin
No. 182, dated March 2, 1981. The service information describes
procedures for installing additional wing fasteners on the LH and RH
wing.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all information and
determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist
or develop on other products of the same type design. This proposed AD
would require you to inspect between the surface of the LH and RH upper
wing skins and the engine mount beam support straps for any signs of
corrosion, replace the upper steel straps with parts of improved
design, and modify both wings.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 275 airplanes in the
U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to do the proposed inspection:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Total cost
                   Labor cost                                Parts cost                  per       Total cost on
                                                                                airplane   U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
80 work-hours x $80 per hour = $6,400..........  Not applicable....................       $6,400      $1,760,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs/
replacements that would be required based on the results of the
proposed inspection. We have no way of determining the number of
airplanes that may need this repair/replacement:

                      Short Modification--Option A*
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Total cost
                                                                 per
             Labor cost                    Parts cost          airplane
                                                               per side
------------------------------------------------------------------------
250 work-hours x $80 per hour =      $9,170 per kit per          $29,170
 $20,000 per side.                    side.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                     Middle Modification--Option B*
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Total cost
                                                                 per
             Labor cost                    Parts cost          airplane
                                                               per side
------------------------------------------------------------------------
280 work-hours x $80 per hour =      $9,170 per kit per          $31,570
 $22,400 per side.                    side.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                      Long Modification--Option C*
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Total cost
                                                                 per
             Labor cost                    Parts cost          airplane
                                                               per side
------------------------------------------------------------------------
320 work-hours x $80 per hour =      $9,170 per kit per          $34,770
 $25,600 per side.                    side.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Note: *Depending on airplane configuration, airplanes with
rectangular plates would need the Plate and Hardware Kit (SB237-4)
at $2,090 per side. Labor to install this kit is included in Options
A, B, and C.

                    Strap Only Replacement--Option D
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Total cost
                                                                 per
             Labor cost                    Parts cost          airplane
                                                               per side
------------------------------------------------------------------------
75 work-hours x $80 per hour =       $6,190 per strap per        $12,190
 $6,000 per side.                     side.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do the proposed installation of
access holes:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Total cost
          Labor cost             Parts cost      per       Total cost on
                                               airplane   U.S. operators
------------------------------------------------------------------------
30 work-hours x $80 per hour =       $1,293       $3,693      $1,015,575
 $2,400.......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do the proposed wing fastener
modification:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Total cost
          Labor cost             Parts cost      per       Total cost on
                                               airplane   U.S. operators
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.5 work-hours x $80 per hour          $250         $930        $255,750
 = $680.......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket that contains the proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information on
the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>)
is located at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Twin Commander Aircraft Corporation: Docket No. FAA-2009-0778;
Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-040-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) action by October 13, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to the following airplane models and serial
numbers that are certificated in any category:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Models                         Serial Nos. (S/Ns)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
690.......................................  All S/Ns.
690A......................................  All S/N except 11195 and
                                             11279.
690B......................................  All S/Ns except 11361,
                                             11383, 11527, and 11536.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from reports that corrosion was found
between the mating surfaces of the wing upper skin surface and the
engine mount beam support straps. We are issuing this AD to detect
and correct corrosion on the engine mount beam support straps and
upper wing skins, which could result in failure of the engine mount
beam support straps. This failure could lead to loss of the engine
and possible loss of control of the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) To address this problem, you must do the following, unless
already done:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Actions                 Compliance            Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Inspect between the       Within the next 150   Follow Twin
 surface of the left-hand      hours time-in-        Commander Aircraft
 (LH) and right-hand (RH)      service after the     LLC Alert Service
 upper wing skins and the      effective date of     Bulletin No. 237,
 engine mount beam support     this AD or within     dated May 13, 2005,
 straps for any signs of       the next 12 months    pages 1 through 14.
 corrosion and determine the   after the effective
 extent of any corrosion       date of this AD,
 found.                        whichever occurs
                               first.
(2) Install modification      Before further        Follow the
 access holes in the LH and    flight after the      Accomplishment
 RH lower wing skins.          inspection required   Instructions, steps
                               in paragraph (e)(1)   1 through 4 and 6
                               of this AD.           through 9, of Twin
                                                     Commander Aircraft
                                                     Corporation Custom
                                                     Kit No. 150, dated
                                                     July 8, 1994, as
                                                     specified in Twin
                                                     Commander Aircraft
                                                     LLC Alert Service
                                                     Bulletin No. 237,
                                                     dated May 13, 2005.
(3) If corrosion damage is    Before further        Follow Twin
 found during the inspection   flight after the      Commander Aircraft
 required in paragraph         inspection required   LLC Alert Service
 (e)(1) of this AD, perform    in paragraph (e)(1)   Bulletin No. 237,
 necessary modification.       of this AD.           dated May 13, 2005,
                                                     Part II, Options A,
                                                     B, or C, on pages
                                                     15 through 29, and
                                                     31.
(4) If corrosion damage is    Before further        Follow Twin
 not found during the          flight after the      Commander Aircraft
 inspection required in        inspection required   LLC Alert Service
 paragraph (e)(1) of this      in paragraph (e)(1)   Bulletin No. 237,
 AD, do the upper steel        of this AD.           dated May 13, 2005,
 strap replacements.                                 Part II, Option D,
                                                     on pages 30 and 31.
(5) Install additional wing   Before further        Follow Gulfstream
 fasteners on the LH and RH    flight after the      American
 wing.                         inspection required   Corporation Service
                               in paragraph (e)(1)   Bulletin No. 182,
                               of the AD.            dated March 2,
                                                     1981.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Note: Although not required by this AD, we highly recommend
compliance with Twin Commander Aircraft Corporation Service Bulletin
No. 217, Revision No. 1, dated May 26, 1993, Engine Nacelle Firewall
Reinforcement; and Twin Commander Aircraft LLC Alert Service
Bulletin No. 239, dated February 13, 2006, Outboard Flap--Inboard
Hinge Inspection & Reinforcement.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (f) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
Attn: Vince Massey, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone: (425) 917-
6475; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

Related Information

    (g) To get copies of the service information referenced in this
AD, contact Twin Commander Aircraft, LLC, 19010 59th Drive, NE.,
Arlington, WA 98223, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
Internet: www.twincommander.com. To view the AD docket, go to U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, or on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 21, 2009.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9-20789 Filed 8-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: July 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 142)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 43398-43399]
[DOCID:fr26jy10-4]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 73

[Docket No. FAA-2008-1261; Airspace Docket No. 06-ASO-18]

Amendment and Establishment of Restricted Areas and Other Special
Use Airspace, Avon Park Air Force Range, FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action makes minor corrections to the geographic
coordinates of restricted areas R-2901B, R-2910J, R-2901K, R-2901L and
R-2901N, Avon Park, FL, in a final rule published in the Federal
Register on Monday, May 24, 2010. The National Aeronautical Navigation
Services Office requested these adjustments be made to better align the
restricted areas.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, July 29, 2010. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Airspace and Rules
Group, Office of System Operations Airspace and AIM, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On May 24, 2010, a final rule was published in the Federal Register
(75 FR 28752), Airspace Docket No. 06-ASO-18, to modify the special use
airspace at the Avon Park Air Force Range in Florida. As a result of
further review of the latitude/longitude coordinates for the Avon Park
Air Force Range restricted areas, the Aeronautical Navigation Services
Office (formerly the National Aeronautical Charting Office) determined
that a minor refinement was needed for two points in several restricted
area descriptions. The correction adjusts the longitude coordinate by
six seconds for one point and by two seconds for the second point.
Specifically, the longitude point in lat. 27[deg]32'31'' N., long.
81[deg]07' 29'' W., is corrected to read ``long. 81[deg]07'23'' W.'',
and; the longitude point in lat. 27[deg]29'31'' N., long.
81[deg]05'29'' W., is corrected to read ``long. 81[deg]05'27'' W''

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73

    Airspace, Prohibited Areas, Restricted Areas.

Correction to Final Rule

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the legal
descriptions of R-2901B, R-2901J, R-2901K, R-2901L, and R-2901N, as
published in the Federal Register on May 24, 2010 (75 FR 28752),
Airspace Docket 06-ASO-18, and incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part
73, is corrected as follows:

Sec.  73.29  [Amended]

    On page 28755, column 2, correct two coordinates for restricted
areas R-2901B and R-2910J; and on page 28756, columns 1 and 2, correct
two coordinates for restricted areas R-2901K, R-2901L and R-2901N, Avon
Park, FL, to read as follows:
* * * * *

R-2901B Avon Park, FL [Corrected]

    By removing lat. 27[deg]32'31'' N., long. 81[deg]07'29'' W., and
substituting lat. 27[deg]32'21'' N., long. 81[deg]07'23'' W.; and by
removing lat. 27[deg]29'31'' N., long. 81[deg]05'29'' W., and
substituting lat. 27[deg]29'31'' N., long. 81[deg]05'27'' W.

R-2901J Avon Park, FL [Corrected]

    By removing lat. 27[deg]32'31'' N., long. 81[deg]07'29'' W., and
substituting lat. 27[deg]32'21'' N., long. 81[deg]07'23'' W.; and by
removing lat. 27[deg]29'31'' N., long. 81[deg]05'29'' W., and

substituting lat. 27[deg]29'31'' N., long. 81[deg]05'27'' W.

R-2901K Avon Park, FL [Corrected]

    By removing lat. 27[deg]32'31'' N., long. 81[deg]07'29'' W., and
substituting lat. 27[deg]32'21'' N., long. 81[deg]07'23'' W.; and by
removing lat. 27[deg]29'31'' N., long. 81[deg]05'29'' W., and
substituting lat. 27[deg]29'31'' N., long. 81[deg]05'27'' W.

R-2901L Avon Park, FL [Corrected]

    By removing lat. 27[deg]32'31'' N., long. 81[deg]07'29'' W., and
substituting lat. 27[deg]32'21'' N., long. 81[deg]07'23'' W.; and by
removing lat. 27[deg]29'31'' N., long. 81[deg]05'29'' W., and
substituting lat. 27[deg]29'31'' N., long. 81[deg]05'27'' W.

R-2901N Avon Park, FL [Corrected]

    By removing lat. 27[deg]32'31'' N., long. 81[deg]07'29'' W., and
substituting lat. 27[deg]32'21'' N., long. 81[deg]07'23'' W.; and by
removing lat. 27[deg]29'31'' N., long. 81[deg]05'29'' W., and
substituting lat. 27[deg]29'31'' N., long. 81[deg]05'27'' W.
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 13, 2010.
Edith V. Parish,
Manager, Airspace and Rules Group.
[FR Doc. 2010-17945 Filed 7-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P