[Federal Register: March 23, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 55)]
[Notices]
[Page 13759-13761]
[DOCID:fr23mr10-59]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0120; FRL-9129-1; EPA ICR Number 1765.07; OMB Control
Number 2060-0353]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Reporting and Recordkeeping
Requirements for National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards
for Automobile Refinish Coatings

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that EPA is planning to submit a
request to renew an existing approved Information Collection Request to
the Office of Management and Budget with no changes to the Information
Collection Request burden estimates. This Information Collection
Request is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2010. Before submitting the
Information Collection Request to Office of Management and Budget for
review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on specific aspects of
the proposed information collection as described below.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before May 24, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2003-0120 by one of the following methods: Federal e-Rulemaking
Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>
     Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC), Air and Radiation Docket Information Center, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Mail Code: 6102T, Washington, DC 20460.
     Hand Delivery: To send comments or documents through a
courier service, the address to use is: EPA Docket Center, Public
Reading Room, EPA West, Room 334, 1301 Constitution

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20004. Such deliveries are accepted only
during the Docket's normal hours of operation--8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday. Special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Electronic Docket ID No. EPA-
HQ-OAR-2003-0120. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
on-line at http://www.regulations.gov including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise to be protected through http:/
/www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The Web site is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means we will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to us without going through http://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, we recommend that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If we cannot read your comment as a result of technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, we may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters or any form of encryption and be free of any defects
or viruses. For additional information about EPA public docket, visit
the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/
dockets.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim Teal, Office of Air and Radiation,
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Natural Resources and
Commerce Group, Mail Code E143-03, Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina 27711; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number: (919)
541-3470; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

How Can I Access the Docket and/or Submit Comments?

    EPA has established a public docket for this Information Collection
Request (ICR) under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0120 which is
available either electronically at http://www.regulations.gov or in
hard copy at the EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room, EPA West, Room
334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20004. The normal
business hours are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays. The telephone for the Reading Room is 202-
566-1744, and the telephone for the Air Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use http://www.regulations.gov to obtain a copy of the draft
collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once
in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified in this document.

What Information Particularly Interests EPA?

    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA), EPA specifically solicits comments and information to enable it
to:
    (i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    (ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden
of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
    (iii) Enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information
to be collected; and
    (iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In particular, EPA is requesting comments from
very small businesses (those that employ less than 25) on examples of
specific additional efforts that EPA could make to reduce the paperwork
burden for very small businesses affected by this collection.

What Should I Consider When I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
    1. Explain your views as clearly as possible and provide specific
examples.
    2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
    3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
    4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
    5. Offer alternative ways to improve the collection activity.
    6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
    7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.

To What Information Collection Activity or ICR Does This Apply?

    Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0120.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action as
respondents are manufacturers and importers of automobile refinish
coatings and coating components. Manufacturers of automobile refinish
coatings and coating components fall within standard industrial
classification (SIC) 2851, ``Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels, and
Allied Products'' and North American Industry Classification System
(NAICS) code 325510, ``Paint and Coating Manufacturing.'' Importers of
automobile refinish coatings and coating components fall within SIC
5198, ``Wholesale Trade: Paints, Varnishes, and Supplies,'' NAICS code
422950, ``Paint, Varnish and Supplies Wholesalers,'' and NAICS code
444120, ``Paint and Wallpaper Stores.''
    Title: Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements for National
Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Automobile Refinish
Coatings (40 CFR part 59).
    ICR number: EPA ICR Number 1765.07, Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Control Number 2060-0353.
    ICR status: This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on June 30,
2010. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal
Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed
either by publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate
means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if
applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA
regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9. Under OMB regulations,
the

Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the collection of information
while this submission is pending at OMB.
    Abstract: The EPA is required under section 183(e) of the Clean Air
Act to regulate volatile organic compound emissions from the use of
consumer and commercial products. Pursuant to section 183(e)(3), the
EPA published a list of consumer and commercial products and a schedule
for their regulation (60 FR 15264). Automobile refinish coatings were
included on the list, and the standards for such coatings are codified
at 40 CFR part 59, subpart B. The reports required under the standards
enable EPA to identify all coating and coating component manufacturers
and importers in the United States and to determine which coatings and
coating components are subject to the standards, based on dates of
manufacture.
    EPA provided notice and sought comments on the previous ICR renewal
on July 8, 2003 (68 FR 40654) and January 25, 2007 (72 FR 3387)
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). The EPA received no comments to that
notice.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average four
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain or disclose
or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the
time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install and
utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting,
validating and verifying information, processing and maintaining
information and disclosing and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and
requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency's estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here:
    Estimated total number of potential respondents: 4.
    Frequency of response: On occasion.
    Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:
One or less per year.
    Estimated total annual burden hours: 14.
    Estimated total annual costs: $940. This includes an estimated
burden cost of $0 and an estimated cost of $0 for capital investment or
maintenance and operational costs.

Are There Changes in the Estimates From the Last Approval?

    There are no changes being made to the estimates in this ICR from
what EPA estimated in the earlier renewal (2007) of this ICR.

What Is the Next Step in the Process for This ICR?

    EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. At that time, EPA will
issue another Federal Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the
opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB.
    If you have any questions about this ICR or the approval process,
please contact the technical person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Dated: March 15, 2010.
Peter Tsirigotis,
Director, Sector Policies and Programs Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-6341 Filed 3-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 114 (Thursday, June 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35620-35621]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14013]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2497-009]

The City of Holyoke Gas & Electric Department; Notice of
Application Accepted for Filing, Soliciting Comments, Motions To
Intervene, and Protests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Surrender of License.
    b. Project No.: 2497-009.
    c. Date Filed: May 17, 2013.
    d. Applicant: The City of Holyoke Gas & Electric Department (HG&E).
    e. Name of Project: Mt. Tom Mill.
    f. Location: On the Holyoke Canal, in Hampden County,
Massachusetts.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: 18 CFR 6.1.
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Paul S. Ducheney, Superintendent--
Electric Production, Holyoke Gas & Electric Department. 99 Suffolk
Street, Holyoke, MA 01040,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Nancy J.
Skancke, NJS Law PLC, 1025 Conn. Ave. NW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC
20036-5417.<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. FERC Contact: Ms. Krista Sakallaris,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and
protests, is 30 days from the issuance date of this notice. All
documents may be filed electronically via the Internet. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. If unable to be filed
electronically, documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an
original and seven copies should be mailed to: Secretary, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters,
without prior registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and
contact information at the end of your comments.
    Please include the project number (P-2497-009) on any comments,
motions, or protests filed.
    k. Description of Request: The applicant proposes to surrender the
license and decommission the generating facilities for the Mt. Tom Mill
Project (P-2497). The applicant states that the project has not
operated since August 2007 due to employee safety concerns; in
addition, a fire occurred in March 2012, which destroyed the roof where
the hydro generator is stored, further damaging the project. The
licensee has determined it is not economical to repair the facilities
and restore project operation. The licensee is proposing to
decommission by disconnecting the generating equipment, and securing
all other project works.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits
in the docket number field to access the document. You may also
register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to
be notified via email of new filings and issuances

related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-
208-3676 or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call (202) 502-
8659. A copy is also available for inspection and reproduction at the
address in item (h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filing must (1)
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or
``MOTION TO INTERVENE'' as applicable; (2) set forth in the heading the
name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise
comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, motions to intervene, or protests must set forth their
evidentiary basis and otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR
4.34(b). All comments, motions to intervene, or protests should relate
to project works which are the subject of the license surrender.
Agencies may obtain copies of the application directly from the
applicant. A copy of any protest or motion to intervene must be served
upon each representative of the applicant specified in the particular
application. If an intervener files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency. A copy of all other
filings in reference to this application must be accompanied by proof
of service on all persons listed in the service list prepared by the
Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and
385.2010.

    Dated: June 6, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-14013 Filed 6-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76322-76324]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30740]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2010-1029]
RIN 1625-AA09

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Fox River, Oshkosh, WI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish remote drawbridge
operating procedures for the Canadian National Railway Bridge across
the Fox River at Mile 55.72 at Oshkosh, Wisconsin. This proposed rule
is intended to establish standard bridge operating conditions for both
vessel and train traffic while allowing the bridge to be remotely
operated.

DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before January 7, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2010-1029 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Mr. Lee D. Soule, Bridge Management Specialist,
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2010-1029), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (http://www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online
via http://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received by the
Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax,
hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as having
been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and a
mailing address, an e-mail address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rules'' and insert ``USCG-2010-1029'' in the ``Keyword''
box. Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the
``Actions'' column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8[frac12] by
11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit
them by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period
and may change the rule based on your comments.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2010-1029'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why one would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and
place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

Basis and Purpose

    The drawbridge owner, Canadian National Railway (CN RR), requested
that the District Commander approve remote operation of the drawbridge
in accordance with 33 CFR 117.42. The drawbridge has been remotely
operated without specific authorization from the District Commander for
approximately 3-4 years, and is currently required to open on signal
year round. Vessel operators have recently informed the Coast Guard
that the drawbridge formerly was left in the open-to-navigation
position and only closed when a train was crossing, but this practice
was no longer used and vessels have been experiencing unreasonable
delays. The Coast Guard has determined that the bridge could continue
to be remotely operated as long as it also provided for the reasonable
needs of navigation. This rule is also necessary to comply with 33 CFR
117.42 by providing a description of the full operation of the remotely
operated drawbridge. This bridge is a swing type railroad bridge that
provides a horizontal clearance of 70 feet in each draw span. The
vertical clearance is 6 feet in the closed position.

Discussion of Proposed Rule

    Between April 15 and October 15 each year, the proposed regulation
would require the bridge to remain in the open-to-navigation position
unless train traffic is crossing, then reopen once train traffic has
passed. The bridge would also be required to maintain and operate a
marine radiotelephone, along with equipment to visually monitor the
waterway and communicate with vessels using all signaling methods
described in 33 CFR 117.15. The proposed light and sound signals would
provide vessels with a method of warning when the bridge is expected to
either close for train traffic or reopen for vessel traffic without
having to establish direct communication with the remote bridge
operator. The proposed regulation also establishes a permanent winter
operating schedule by requiring vessels to provide at least 12-hours
advance notice for a bridge opening during winter, or during the
traditional non-boating season, between October 16 and April 14 each
year.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. This determination is
expected to improve intermodal transportation at the bridge crossing
and does not exclude either vessel or train traffic.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The proposed regulation is expected to
increase availability of the drawbridge for vessel traffic and
potentially increase access by, and to, small entities on the waterway.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Mr. Lee D. Soule, Bridge
Management Specialist, U. S. Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-
mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically

significant rule and would not create an environmental risk to health
or risk to safety that might disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have Tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01, and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment because it simply
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. We
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.
    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

    1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

    2. In Sec.  117.1087 add paragraph (e) to read as follows:

Sec.  117.1087  Fox River.

* * * * *
    (e) The draw of the Canadian National Bridge, mile 55.72, at
Oshkosh, shall operate as follows:
    (1) From April 15 to October 15 the draw will be remotely operated
and shall remain in the open position for vessel traffic unless the
following train sequence occurs; when a train is scheduled to cross the
bridge, a flashing red light will be displayed when the bridge will
close in 10 minutes, then a fixed red light when the bridge will close
in 5 minutes, then a flashing red light and continuous ringing bell
when the bridge will close in 1 minute, and during the closing
sequence. After train traffic has crossed, and when the bridge again
opens for vessel traffic, a flashing red light and continuous ringing
bell will be displayed when the bridge will open in 1 minute, and
during the opening sequence.
    (2) From October 16 to April 14 the draw shall open on signal if at
least a 12 hour advance notice is provided.
    (3) Before the bridge opens or closes, and while the draw is in
motion, the remote operator shall monitor waterway traffic by remote
visual inspection to show the waterway is clear and it is safe to
operate the draw. The remote operator shall also announce that the
bridge is opening or closing on VHF-FM Marine Radiotelephone. The
owners of the bridge shall maintain 2 board gauges in accordance with
33 CFR 118.160 of this chapter. The remote drawtender may be contacted
by mariners at anytime by radiotelephone or commercial phone number;
this information shall be so posted on the bridge so that they are
plainly visible to vessel operators approaching the up or downstream
side of the bridge.

    Dated: November 23, 2010.
M.N. Parks,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, Ninth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2010-30740 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: May 3, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 85)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 25951-25956]
[DOCID:fr03my06-13]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2004-0398; FRL-8057-5]

Flumioxazin; Pesticide Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of
flumioxazin, 2-[7-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-3-oxo-4-(2-propynyl)-2H-1,4-
benzoxazin-6-yl]-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione in or on
pome fruit crop group 11, stone fruit crop group 12 and strawberry.
Valent U.S.A. Corporation requested this tolerance under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended by the Food Quality
Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA).

DATES: This regulation is effective May 3, 2006. Actions and requests
for hearings must be received on or before July 3, 2006.

ADDRESSES:  To submit a written objection or hearing request follow the
detailed instructions as provided in Unit VI. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2004-0398. All documents in the
docket are listed on the regulations.gov Web site. (EDOCKET, EPA's
electronic public docket and comment system was replaced on November
25, 2005, by an enhanced federal-wide electronic docket management and
comment system located at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-

line instructions.) Although listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., confidential business information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in EDOCKET or in hard copy at the Public Information and Records
Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 2, 1801 S.
Bell St., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket
telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Important Note: OPP will be moving to a new location the
first week of May 2006. As a result, from Friday, April 28 to Friday,
May 5, 2006, the OPP Regulatory Public Docket will NOT be accepting any
deliveries at the Crystal Mall 2 address and this facility
will be closed to the public. Beginning on May 8, 2006, the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket will reopen at 8:30 a.m. and deliveries will
be accepted in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S.
Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202. The mail code for the mailing
address will change to (7502P), but will otherwise remain the same. The
OPP Regulatory Public Docket telephone number and hours of operation
will remain the same after the move.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joanne I. Miller, Registration
Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS 111), e.g., agricultural workers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture workers; farmers.
     Animal production (NAICS 112), e.g., cattle ranchers and
farmers, dairy cattle farmers, livestock farmers.
     Food manufacturing (NAICS 311), e.g., agricultural
workers; farmers; greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture workers;
ranchers; pesticide applicators.
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 32532), e.g., agricultural
workers; commercial applicators; farmers; greenhouse, nursery, and
floriculture workers; residential users.
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this Unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document and Other
Related Information?

    In addition to using EDOCKET (http://www.epa.gov/edocket), you may

access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA
Internet under the ``Federal Register'' listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr.
 A frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 is

available at E-CFR Beta Site Two at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr. To

access the OPPTS Harmonized Guidelines referenced in this document, go
directly to the guidelines at http://www.epa.gpo/opptsfrs/home/guidelin.htm
.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

    In the Federal Register of December 8, 2004 (69 FR 71045) (FRL-
7689-1), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
4F6829) by Valent U.S.A. Corporation, 1333 North California Boulevard,
Suite 600, Walnut Creek, California 94596-8025. The petition requested
that 40 CFR 180.568 be amended by establishing tolerances for residues
of the herbicide flumioxazin, 2-[7-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-3-oxo-4-(2-
propynyl)-2H-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-isoindole-
1,3(2H)-dione, in or on fruit, pome group 11 at 0.02 parts per million
(ppm) and fruit, stone, group 12 at 0.02 ppm.
    In the Federal Register of April 8, 2005 (70 FR 18004) (FRL-7689-
1), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
4E6845) by Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4), Rutgers,
State University of New Jersey, 681 U.S. Highway 1 S., North
New Brunswick, NJ 08902. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.568 be
amended by establishing tolerances for residues of the herbicide
flumioxazin, 2-[7-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-3-oxo-4-(2-propynyl)-2H-1,4-
benzoxazin-6-yl]-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione, in or
on strawberry at 0.10 ppm.
    These notices included a summary of the petitions prepared by
Valent U.S.A. Corporation, the registrant and Interregional Research
Project Number 4 (IR-4). Based on residue chemistry strawberry field
trials the strawberry tolerance is being lowered to 0.07 ppm. One
comment was received on the notices of filing. EPA's response to this
comment is discussed in Unit IV.C.
    Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue....''
    EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. For further discussion of the
regulatory requirements of section 408 of the FFDCA and a complete

http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/1997/November/Day-26/p30948.htm.

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

    Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to
make a determination on aggregate exposure, consistent with section
408(b)(2) of FFDCA, for tolerances for residues of flumioxazin on
fruit, pome, group 11 at 0.02 ppm, fruit, stone, group 12 at 0.02 ppm,
and strawberry at 0.07 ppm. EPA's assessment of exposures and risks
associated with establishing the tolerance follows.

A. Toxicological Profile

    EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children. Specific information on the studies received and the nature
of the toxic effects caused by flumioxazin as well as the no-observed-
adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-
level (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies are discussed in the Federal
Register of August 25, 2004 (69 FR 52192) (FRL-7369-9).

B. Toxicological Endpoints

    A summary of the toxicological endpoints for flumioxazin used for
human risk assessment is discussed in Unit III.B. of the final rule
published in the Federal Register of August 25, 2004 (69 FR 52192)
(FRL-7369-9).

C. Exposure Assessment

    1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. Tolerances have been
established (40 CFR 180.568) for the residues of flumioxazin, in or on
a variety of raw agricultural commodities. Risk assessments were
conducted by EPA to assess dietary exposures from flumioxazin in food
as follows:
    i. Acute exposure. Quantitative acute dietary exposure and risk
assessments are performed for a food-use pesticide, if a toxicological
study has indicated the possibility of an effect of concern occurring
as a result of a 1-day or single exposure.
    In conducting the acute dietary risk assessment EPA used the
Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model software with the Food Commodity
Intake Database (DEEM-FCID\TM\), which incorporates food consumption
data as reported by respondents in the U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) 1994-1996 and 1998 Nationwide Continuing Surveys of Food Intake
by Individuals (CSFII), and accumulated exposure to the chemical for
each commodity. The following assumptions were made for the acute
exposure assessments: For the acute analyses, tolerance-level residues
were assumed for all food commodities with current or proposed
flumioxazin tolerances, and it was assumed that all of the crops
included in the analysis were treated. Percent Crop Treated (PCT) and/
or anticipated residues were not used in the acute risk assessment.
    ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting the chronic dietary risk
assessment EPA used the DEEM-FCID\TM\, which incorporates food
consumption data as reported by respondents in the USDA 1994-1996 and
1998 Nationwide CSFII, and accumulated exposure to the chemical for
each commodity. The following assumptions were made for the chronic
exposure assessments: For the chronic analyses, tolerance-level
residues were assumed for all food commodities with current or proposed
flumioxazin tolerances, and it was assumed that all of the crops
included in the analysis were treated. PCT and/or anticipated residues
were not used in the chronic risk assessment.
    2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency lacks
sufficient monitoring exposure data to complete a comprehensive dietary
exposure analysis and risk assessment for flumioxazin and its
degradates (482-HA and APF) in drinking water. Because the Agency does
not have comprehensive monitoring data, drinking water concentration
estimates are made by reliance on simulation or modeling taking into
account data on the physical characteristics of flumioxazin and its
degradates (482-HA and APF).
    The Agency uses the FQPA Index Reservoir Screening Tool (FIRST) or
the Pesticide Root Zone Model/Exposure Analysis Modeling System (PRZM/
EXAMS), to produce estimates of pesticide concentrations in an index
reservoir. The screening concentration in ground water (SCI-GROW) model
is used to predict pesticide concentrations in shallow ground water.
For a screening-level assessment for surface water EPA will use FIRST
(a Tier 1 model) before using PRZM/EXAMS (a Tier 2 model). The FIRST
model is a subset of the PRZM/EXAMS model that uses a specific high-end
runoff scenario for pesticides. Both FIRST and PRZM/EXAMS incorporate
an index reservoir environment, and both models include a percent crop
area factor as an adjustment to account for the maximum percent crop
coverage within a watershed or drainage basin.
    None of these models include consideration of the impact processing
(mixing, dilution, or treatment) of raw water for distribution as
drinking water would likely have on the removal of pesticides from the
source water. The primary use of these models by the Agency at this
stage is to provide a screen for sorting out pesticides for which it is
unlikely that drinking water concentrations would exceed human health
levels of concern.
    Since the models used are considered to be screening tools in the
risk assessment process, the Agency uses the estimated environmental
concentrations (EECs), which are the model estimates of a pesticide's
concentration in water. EECs derived from these models are used to
quantify drinking water exposure and risk as a percent reference dose
(%RfD) or percent population adjusted dose (%PAD).
    Based on the FIRST and SCI-GROW models, the EECs of flumioxazin and
its degradates (482-HA and APF) for acute exposures are estimated to be
a total of 34 parts per billion (ppb) for surface water and 48 ppb for
ground water. The EECs for chronic exposures are estimated to be a
total of 18 ppb for surface water and 48 ppb for ground water.
    3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control,
termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets).
    Flumioxazin is not registered for use on any sites that would
result in residential exposure.
    4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of the FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
    Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative
risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made
a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to flumioxazin and any other
substances and flumioxazin does not appear to produce a toxic
metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of

this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has not assumed that flumioxazin
has a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For
information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a
common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of
such chemicals, see the policy statements released by EPA's Office of
Pesticide Programs concerning common mechanism determinations and
procedures for cumulating effects from substances found to have a
common mechanism on EPA's Web site at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative
.

D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children

    1. In general. Section 408 of FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply
an additional tenfold margin of safety for infants and children in the
case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity and exposure
unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a different margin of
safety will be safe for infants and children. Margins of safety are
incorporated into EPA risk assessments either directly through use of a
margin of exposure (MOE) analysis or through using uncertainty (safety)
factors in calculating a dose level that poses no appreciable risk to
humans. In applying this provision, EPA either retains the default
value of 10X when reliable data do not support the choice of a
different factor, or, if reliable data are available, EPA uses a
different additional safety factor value based on the use of
traditional uncertainty factors and/or special FQPA safety factors, as
appropriate.
    2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity. Although increased prenatal
and postnatal quantitative susceptibility was seen in rats, it was
concluded that there is low concern and no residual uncertainties for
prenatal and/or postnatal toxicity because:
    i. Developmental toxicity NOAELs/LOAELs are well characterized
after oral and dermal exposure.
    ii. Offspring toxicity NOAEL/LOAEL are well characterized.
    iii. There is a well-defined dose-response curve for the
cardiovascular effects seen following oral exposure (i.e., critical
period).
    iv. The endpoints of concern are used for overall risk assessments
for appropriate route and population subgroups.
    3. Conclusion. There is a complete toxicity database for
flumioxazin and exposure data are complete or are estimated based on
data that reasonably accounts for potential exposures. The
developmental toxicity and offspring toxicity NOAELs/LOAELs are well
characterized. There is a well-defined dose-response curve for the
cardiovascular effects and the endpoints of concern are used for
overall risk assessments and are appropriate for the route of exposure
and population subgroups. The dietary food exposure assessment utilizes
tolerance level residues and 100% crop treated (CT) information for all
commodities. By using these screening-level assumptions, chronic
exposures/risks will not be underestimated. The dietary drinking water
assessment utilizes values generated by models and associated modeling
parameters which are designed to provide conservative, health
protective, high-end estimates of water concentrations. Accordingly,
the additional 10X factor for the protection of infants and children is
removed.

E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety

    1. Acute risk. Using the exposure assumptions discussed in this
Unit for acute exposure, the acute dietary exposure from food and
drinking water to flumioxazin will occupy 8% of the acute population
adjusted dose (aPAD) for females 13 to 49 years old (the only subgroup
for which an acute endpoint was selected).
    2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described in this
Unit for chronic exposure, EPA has concluded that exposure to
flumioxazin from food and drinking water will utilize 6% of the chronic
population adjusted dose (cPAD) for the U.S. population, 18% of the
cPAD for all infants less than 1-year old, and 11% of the cPAD for
children 1-2 years old. There are no residential uses for flumioxazin
that result in chronic residential exposure to flumioxazin.
    3. Short-term risk. Short-term aggregate exposure takes into
account residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food and water
(considered to be a background exposure level).
    Flumioxazin is not registered for use on any sites that would
result in residential exposure. Therefore, the aggregate risk is the
sum of the risk from food and water, which do not exceed the Agency's
level of concern.
    4. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
to the general population, and to infants and children from aggregate
exposure to flumioxazin residues.

IV. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    Adequate enforcement methodology (gas chromatography-nitrogen
phosphorus detection) is available to enforce the tolerance expression.
The method may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch,
Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755-5350;
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

B. International Residue Limits

    There are no Codex, Canadian or Mexican maximum residue limits
established for flumioxazin on fruit, pome, fruit, stone or strawberry.

C. Response to Comments

    Public comments were received from B. Sachau who objected to the
proposed tolerances because of the amounts of pesticides already
consumed and carried by the American population. She further indicated
that testing conducted on animals have absolutely no validity and are
cruel to the test animals. B. Sachau's comments contained no scientific
data or evidence to rebut the Agency's conclusion that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to flumioxazin, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is reliable information. EPA has
responded to B. Sachau's generalized comments on numerous previous
occasions. (70 FR 1349, January 7, 2005); 69 FR 63083, October 29,
2004.

V. Conclusion

    Therefore, the tolerance is established for residues of
flumioxazin, 2-[7-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-3-oxo-4-(2-propynyl)-2H-1,4-
benzoxazin-6-yl]-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione, in or
on fruit, pome, group 11 at 0.02 ppm, fruit, stone, group 12 at 0.02
ppm, and strawberry at 0.07 ppm.

VI. Objections and Hearing Requests

    Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, as amended by FQPA, any person may
file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request
a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural regulations which
govern the submission of objections and requests for hearings appear in
40 CFR part 178. Although the procedures in those regulations require
some modification to reflect the amendments made to FFDCA by FQPA, EPA
will continue to use those procedures, with appropriate adjustments,
until the necessary modifications can be made. The new

section 408(g) of FFDCA provides essentially the same process for
persons to ``object'' to a regulation for an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance issued by EPA under new section 408(d) of
FFDCA, as was provided in the old sections 408 and 409 of FFDCA.
However, the period for filing objections is now 60 days, rather than
30 days.

A. What Do I Need to Do to File an Objection or Request a Hearing?

    You must file your objection or request a hearing on this
regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in this Unit
and in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2004-0398 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and
must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before July 3,
2006.
    1. Filing the request. Your objection must specify the specific
provisions in the regulation that you object to, and the grounds for
the objections (40 CFR 178.25). If a hearing is requested, the
objections must include a statement of the factual issue(s) on which a
hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions on such issues, and a
summary of any evidence relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27).
Information submitted in connection with an objection or hearing
request may be claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that
information as CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except
in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the
information that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion
in the public record. Information not marked confidential may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice.
    Mail your written request to: Office of the Hearing Clerk (1900L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. You may also deliver your request to the
Office of the Hearing Clerk in Suite 350, 1099 14th St., NW.,
Washington, DC 20005. The Office of the Hearing Clerk is open from 8
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Office of the Hearing Clerk is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    2. Copies for the Docket. In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in Unit VI.A.1.,
you should also send a copy of your request to the PIRIB for its
inclusion in the official record that is described in ADDRESSES. Mail
your copies, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2004-0398, to:
Public Information and Records Integrity Branch, Information Technology
and Resources Management Division (7502C), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. In person or by courier, bring a copy to the
location of the PIRIB described in ADDRESSES.

B. When Will the Agency Grant a Request for a Hearing?

    A request for a hearing will be granted if the Administrator
determines that the material submitted shows the following: There is a
genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a reasonable
possibility that available evidence identified by the requestor would,
if established resolve one or more of such issues in favor of the
requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts to the
contrary; and resolution of the factual issue(s) in the manner sought
by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested (40
CFR 178.32).

VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This final rule establishes a tolerance under section 408(d) of
FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of
significance, this rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This final rule does
not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose
any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law
104-4). Nor does it require any special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice
in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994); or OMB review or any Agency action under Executive
Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does
not involve any technical standards that would require Agency
consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since
tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a
petition under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply. In addition, the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism
(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to
develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies
that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism
implications'' is defined in the Executive order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.'' This final rule directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers and food retailers, not States. This action
does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. For these same reasons, the Agency has
determined that this rule does not have any ``tribal implications'' as
described in Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6,
2000). Executive Order 13175, requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in
the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.''
``Policies that have tribal implications'' is defined in the Executive
order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.''
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the

relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.

VIII. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: April 26, 2006.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

0
2. Section 180.568 is amended by alphabetically adding commodities to
the table in paragraph (a) to read as follows:

Sec.  180.568   Flumioxazin; tolerances for residues.

    (a) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      Commodity                        Parts per million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                * * * * *
Fruit, pome, group 11................................               0.02
Fruit, stone, group 12...............................               0.02
                                * * * * *
Strawberry...........................................               0.07
                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 06-4159 Filed 5-2-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 231 (Friday, November 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71407-71408]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28957]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER10-2877-001.
    Applicants: Cobb Electric Membership Corp.
    Description: COBB Electric Membership Corp. submits Second
Amendment to the December 20, 2011 Updated Market Power Analysis.
    Filed Date: 11/20/12.
    Accession Number: 20121120-5205.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-919-002.
    Applicants: Rockland Wind Farm LLC.
    Description: Rockland Wind Farm LLC submits Notice of Non-Material
Change in Status.
    Filed Date: 11/21/12.
    Accession Number: 20121121-5030.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/12/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-433-000.
    Applicants: Grant Energy, Inc.
    Description: Cancellation to be effective 11/21/2012.
    Filed Date: 11/20/12.
    Accession Number: 20121120-5141.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-434-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Marketing, Inc.
    Description: New Baseline Refile to be effective 11/21/2012.
    Filed Date: 11/20/12.
    Accession Number: 20121120-5144.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/12

    Docket Numbers: ER13-435-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: NYISO OATT Revisions Re: Blind Trust Mechanism to be
effective 1/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/20/12.
    Accession Number: 20121120-5176.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/4/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-436-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: BPA Cooperative Communications Agreement 4th Revised
to be effective 11/21/2012.
    Filed Date: 11/20/12.
    Accession Number: 20121120-5177
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-437-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: NYISO Agreement Revisions Re: Blind Trust Mechanism to
be effective 1/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/20/12.
    Accession Number: 20121120-5180.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/4/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-438-000
    Applicants: PSEG Fossil LLC.
    Description: Capacity Interconnection Rights Agreement to be
effective 11/21/2012.
    Filed Date: 11/21/12.
    Accession Number: 20121121-5000.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/12/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-439-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Petition for Approval of Disposition of Proceeds of
Penalty Assessments of the California Independent System Operator
Corporation.
    Filed Date: 11/20/12.
    Accession Number: 20121120-5215.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-440-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Original Service Agreement No. 3418; Queue No. X3-071
to be effective 10/24/2012.
    Filed Date: 11/21/12.
    Accession Number: 20121121-5043.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/12/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-441-000
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Revised Essex ISA--First Revised Service Agreement No.
2382 to be effective 11/20/2012.
    Filed Date: 11/21/12.
    Accession Number: 20121121-5050.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/12/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-442-000

    Applicants: AES Beaver Valley, LLC.
    Description: AES Beaver Valley MBR Tariff Filing to be effective 1/
1/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/21/12.
    Accession Number: 20121121-5052.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/12/12.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following PURPA
210(m)(3) filings:
    Docket Numbers: QM13-1-000
    Applicants: Wisconsin Public Service Corporation, Upper Peninsula
Power Company
    Description: Application of Wisconsin Public Service Corporation
and Upper Peninsula Power Company to Terminate QF Mandatory Purchase
Obligation.
    Filed Date: 11/21/12
    Accession Number: 20121121-5029
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/19/12.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 21, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-28957 Filed 11-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 166 (Monday, August 27, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43606-43607]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18528]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 721

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2017-0560; FRL-9982-78]
RIN 2070-AB27

Significant New Use Rules on Certain Chemical Substances

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing significant new use rules (SNURs) under the
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for 10 chemical substances which
were the subject of premanufacture notices (PMNs). The chemical
substances are subject to Orders issued by EPA pursuant to section 5(e)
of TSCA. This action would require persons who intend to manufacture
(defined by statute to include import) or process any of these 10
chemical substances for an activity that is designated as a significant
new use by this rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing
that activity. The required notification initiates EPA's evaluation of
the intended use within the applicable review period. Persons may not
commence manufacture or processing for the significant new use until
EPA has conducted a review of the notice, made an appropriate
determination on the notice, and has taken such actions as are required
with that determination. In addition to this notice of proposed
rulemaking, EPA is issuing the action as a direct final rule elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 26, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2017-0560, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: Document Control Office (7407M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact:
Kenneth Moss, Chemical Control Division (7405M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 564-9232; email address: [email protected].
    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In addition to this notice of proposed
rulemaking, EPA is issuing the action as a direct final rule elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register. For further

information about the proposed significant new use rules, please see
the information provided in the direct final action, with the same
title, that is located in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this
issue of the Federal Register.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721

    Environmental protection, Chemicals, Hazardous substances,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: August 20, 2018.
Jeffery T. Morris,
Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2018-18528 Filed 8-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24842-24844]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09820]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2016-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1610]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, the FIRM and FIS
report, once effective, will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before July 26, 2016.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location and the respective Community Map Repository address listed in
the tables below. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-1610, to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and also are used to calculate the appropriate
flood insurance premium rates for new buildings built after the FIRM
and FIS report become effective.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at http://floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_fact_sheet.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location and
the respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables.
For communities with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies
can be identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM
date listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and
FIS report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA
Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: April 12, 2016.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation, Department
of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
    I. Watershed-based studies:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Upper Sangamon River Watershed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Macon County, Illinois, and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Decatur........................  City Hall, 1 Gary K. Anderson
                                          Plaza, Decatur, IL 62523.
Unincorporated Areas of Macon County...  Macon County Office Building,
                                          141 South Main Street
                                         Decatur, IL 62523.
Village of Forsyth.....................  Village Hall, 301 South Route
                                          51, Forsyth, IL 62535.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    II. Non-watershed-based studies:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Mendocino County, California and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Project: 15-09-0493S Preliminary Date: August 28, 2015
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Willits........................  City Planning Department, 111
                                          East Commercial Street,
                                          Willits, CA 95490.
Unincorporated Areas of Mendocino        Planning Department, 860 North
 County.                                  Bush Street, Ukiah, CA 95482.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Mendocino County, California and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Project: 11-09-0848S Preliminary Date: September 14, 2015
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Fort Bragg.....................  Community Development
                                          Department, 416 North Franklin
                                          Street, Fort Bragg, CA 95437.
City of Point Arena....................  City Hall, 451 School Street,
                                          Point Arena, CA 95468.
Unincorporated Areas of Mendocino        Planning Department, 860 North
 County.                                  Bush Street, Ukiah, CA 95482.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Placer County, California and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Project: 11-09-0868S Preliminary Date: December 28, 2015
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Auburn.........................  Planning and Public Works
                                          Department, 1225 Lincoln Way,
                                          Auburn, CA 95603.
City of Lincoln........................  Engineering Department, 600
                                          Sixth Street, Lincoln, CA
                                          95648.
City of Rocklin........................  Engineering Department, 3970
                                          Rocklin Road, Rocklin, CA
                                          95677.
City of Roseville......................  Engineering Department, 311
                                          Vernon Street, Roseville, CA
                                          95678.
Town of Loomis.........................  Town Hall, 3665 Taylor Road,
                                          Loomis, CA 95650.
Unincorporated Areas of Placer County..  Placer County Public Works and
                                          Facilities, 3091 County Center
                                          Drive, Auburn, CA 95603.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Gladwin County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Project:12-05-2231S Preliminary Date: March 27, 2015
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Beaverton......................  124 West Brown Street,
                                          Beaverton, MI 48612.
City of Gladwin........................  1000 West Cedar Avenue,
                                          Gladwin, MI 48624.
Township of Beaverton..................  4496 Dale Road, Beaverton, MI
                                          48612.
Township of Billings...................  1050 Estey Road, Beaverton, MI
                                          48612.
Township of Bourret....................  2749 School Road, Alger, MI
                                          48610.
Township of Buckeye....................  1498 South Hockaday Road,
                                          Beaverton, MI 48624.
Township of Butman.....................  5005 North Hockaday Road,
                                          Gladwin, MI 48624.
Township of Clement....................  1497 E M-30, Alger, MI 48610.
Township of Gladwin....................  2001 Wagarville Road, Gladwin,
                                          MI 48624.
Township of Grout......................  1490 South Grout Road, Gladwin,
                                          MI 48624.
Township of Hay........................  1220 East Highwood Road,
                                          Beaverton, MI 48612.
Township of Sage.......................  1831 North Pratt Lake Road,
                                          Gladwin, MI 48624.
Township of Secord.....................  1507 Secord Dam Road, Gladwin,
                                          MI 48624.
Township of Sherman....................  4013 Oberlin Road, Gladwin, MI
                                          48624.
Township of Tobacco....................  1826 Dale Road, Beaverton, MI
                                          48612.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                Houston County, MN and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Project:11-05-1551S Preliminary Dates: December 31, 2014 & January 15,
                                  2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Brownsville....................  City Hall, 104 North 6th
                                          Street, Brownsville, MN 55919.
City of Caledonia......................  City Hall, 231 East Main
                                          Street, Caledonia, MN 55921.
City of Hokah..........................  City Hall, 102 Main Street,
                                          Hokah, MN 55941.
City of Houston........................  City Hall, 105 West Maple
                                          Street, Houston, MN 55943.
City of La Crescent....................  City Hall, 315 Main Street, La
                                          Crescent, MN 55947.
City of Spring Grove...................  City Hall, 118 First Avenue
                                          Northwest, Spring Grove, MN
                                          55974.
Township of La Crescent................  Township Hall, 830 Town Hall
                                          Road, La Crescent, MN 55947.
Unincorporated Areas of Houston County.  Houston County Courthouse, 304
                                          South Marshall Street,
                                          Caledonia, MN 55921.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Fairfield County, Ohio and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Project:14-05-9584S Preliminary Date: January 4, 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Lancaster......................  City Building Department, 121
                                          East Chestnut Street,
                                          Lancaster, OH 43130.
City of Pickerington...................  City Hall, 51 East Columbus
                                          Street, Pickerington, OH
                                          43147.
Unincorporated Areas of Fairfield        Fairfield County Administrative
 County.                                  Courthouse, 210 East Main
                                          Street, Lancaster, OH 43130.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2016-09820 Filed 4-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50134]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19216]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2021-N-0944]

Pediatric Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting; Establishment of
a Public Docket; Request for Comments; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice
entitled ``Pediatric Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting;
Establishment of a Public Docket; Request for Comments.'' The document
announced a meeting of the Pediatric Advisory Committee. The document
was published with the incorrect docket number and end time of the
meeting. This document corrects those errors.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marieann Brill, Office of the
Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
Bldg. 32, Rm. 5154, Silver Spring, MD 20993,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or FDA
Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138<PHONE_NUMBER> in
the Washington, DC area). Please call the Information Line for up-to-
date information on this meeting.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of Tuesday, August
10, 2021, in FR Doc. 2021-16984 (86 FR 43666), the following
corrections are made.
    1. On page 43666, in the first column, in the header of the
document, and in the third column under ``Instructions,'' ``Docket No.
FDA-2020-N-1648N'' is changed to ``Docket No. FDA-2021-N-0944''.
    2. On page 43666, in the first column, the DATES portion of the
document is changed to: ``The meeting will be held on September 17,
2021, from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. Eastern Time.''
    This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. app. 2) and 21 CFR part 14, relating to the advisory committees.

    Dated: August 31, 2021.
Lauren K. Roth,
Acting Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-19216 Filed 9-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P