[Federal Register: September 3, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 171)]
[Notices]
[Page 51470-51472]
[DOCID:fr03se08-66]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0610; FRL-8378-1]

Nosema locustae Registration Review Proposed Decision; Notice of
Availability

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's proposed
registration review decision for the pesticides case, Nosema locustae,
and opens a public comment period on the proposed registration review
decision. Registration review is EPA's periodic review of pesticide
registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the
statutory standard for registration, that is, that the pesticide can
perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on
human health or the environment. Through this program, EPA is ensuring
that each pesticide's registration is based on current scientific and
other knowledge, including its effects on human health and the
environment.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 3, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) numbers EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0997 for Nosema locustae, by one of the
following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to the docket ID number and the
regulatory contact listed under Table 1 for the case to which you are
submitting a comment. EPA's policy is that all comments received will
be included in the docket without change and may be made available on-
line at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available in regulations.gov. To access the electronic docket, go to
http://www.regulations.gov, select ``Advanced Search,'' then ``Docket
Search.'' Insert the docket ID number where indicated and select the
``Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on the regulations.gov
website to view the docket index or

access available documents. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either in the electronic docket at http://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of operation of this
Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703)
305-5805.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about the
biopesticides included in this document, contact the specific
Regulatory contact, as identified in the Table in Unit II.A. for the
biopesticide of interest. The mailing address and additional contact
information is Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division,
(7511P); Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For general questions on the registration review program, contact
Peter Caulkins, Special Review and Reregistration Division (7508P),
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(703) 305-6550; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. Background

A. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    This notice opens a 60-day public comment period on the subject
proposed registration review decision. The Agency is proposing a
registration review decision for the pesticide case shown in the
following Table 1.

     Table 1.--Registration Review Dockets; Proposed final decisions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Regulatory Contact
  Registration Review Case Name    Pesticide Docket       name, Phone
           and Number                  ID Number        Number, E-mail
                                                            Address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nosema locustae; Case 4104        EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-09  Jeannine Kausch
                                   97<PHONE_NUMBER>;
                                                      kausch.jeannine@ep
                                                       a.gov
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The docket for registration review of this pesticide case includes
earlier documents related to the registration review of the subject
case. For example, the review opened with the posting of a Summary
Document, containing a Preliminary Work Plan (PWP), for public comment.
A Final Work Plan (FWP) was posted to the docket following public
comment on the initial docket. The documents in the initial docket
described the Agency's rationales for not conducting new risk
assessments for the registration review of Nosema locustae. This
proposed registration review decision now included in the docket
continues to be supported by those rationales included in documents in
the initial docket. Following public comment, the Agency will issue a
final registration review decision for this case.
    The registration review program is being conducted under
congressionally mandated time frames, and EPA recognizes the need both
to make timely decisions and to involve the public. Section 3(g) of the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) as amended
in 1996 required EPA to establish by regulation procedures for
reviewing pesticide registrations, originally with a goal of reviewing
each pesticide's registration every 15 years to ensure that a pesticide
continues to meet the FIFRA standard for registration. The Agency's
final rule to implement this program was issued in August 2006 and
became effective in October 2006 and appears at 40 CFR 155.40.

    The Pesticide Registration Improvement Act of 2003 (PRIA) was
amended and extended in September 2007. FIFRA as amended by PRIA in
2007 requires EPA to complete registration review decisions by October
1, 2022 for all pesticides registered as of October 1, 2007. The
registration review final rule provides for a minimum 60-day public
comment period for all proposed registration review decisions.
    This comment period is intended to provide an opportunity for
public input and a mechanism for initiating any necessary amendments to
the proposed decision. All comments should be submitted using the
methods in ADDRESSES, and must be received by EPA on or before the
closing date. These comments will become part of the Agency Docket for
Nosema locustae. Comments received after the close of the comment
period will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these
late comments.
    The Agency will carefully consider all comments received by the
closing date and will provide a Response to Comments Memorandum in the
Dockets and www.regulations.gov. The final registration review
decisions will explain the effect that any comments have had on the
decisions. Background on the registration review program is provided
at: http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/registration_review/. Quick links to
earlier documents related to the registration review of this pesticide
are provided at: http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/registration_review/reg_
review_status.htm/. Additional information about biopesticides can be
obtained by an alphabetical search of the Biopesticide Active
Ingredient Fact Sheets on http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/
ingredients/index.htm

B. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?

    FIFRA Section 3(g) and 40 CFR 155.40 provide authority for this
action.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, registration review, pesticides, and
pests.

    Dated: August 21, 2008.
Janet L. Andersen,
Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E8-20395 Filed 9-2-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register: October 14, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 198)]
[Notices]
[Page 60118-60119]
[DOCID:fr14oc05-78]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-52569; File No. SR-NYSE-2005-61]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
and Amendment No. 2 Thereto Relating to an Interpretation of Exchange
Rule 452

October 6, 2005.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 2, 2005, the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in items I, II, and III below, which
items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed Amendment
Nos. 1 \3\ and 2 \4\ to the proposed rule change on September 20, 2005
and September 28, 2005, respectively. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended,
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Amendment No. 1 was intended to replace and supersede the
filing in its entirety. However, the Exchange withdrew Amendment No.
1 on September 28, 2005 since the Exchange inadvertently submitted
Amendment No. 1 incorrectly under to Rule 19b-4(f)(6), rather than
Rule 19b-4(f)(1).
    \4\ In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange made non-substantive
clarifying changes to reference Sections 402.06 and 402.08 of the
Exchange's Listed Company Manual, in the Purpose section of its
filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend an Exchange interpretation of
Exchange Rule 452 (Giving Proxies by Member Organizations).\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Commission notes that the proposed rule change, as
amended, does not amend the text of Exchange Rule 452 or its
Supplementary Material.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Exchange Rule 452 (which is referenced in Sections 402.06 and
402.08 of the Listed Company Manual) provides that a member
organization may give a proxy to vote shares registered in its name,
notwithstanding the failure of the beneficial owner to instruct the
firm how to vote, provided, among other things, that the proposal being
voted on does not involve a matter which ``may affect substantially the
rights or privileges of such stock.'' By way of example, Supplementary
Material .11 to Rule 452 (which is also referenced in Section 402.08 of
the Listed Company Manual) lists 18 actions in respect of which member
organizations may not vote uninstructed shares. In addition to those 18
specific actions, the Exchange has interpreted Rule 452 to preclude
member organizations from voting without instructions in certain other
situations, including any material amendment to the investment advisory
contract with an investment company.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 30697 (May 13,
1992), 57 FR 21434 (May 20, 1992) (SR-NYSE-92-05).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For many years, the Exchange interpreted this provision to permit
member organizations to vote uninstructed shares on the authorization
of new investment company investment advisory contracts, where the
change in identity of the investment adviser was the only change being
made to the substantive terms of the contract.
    The Exchange, following discussions with staff from the
Commission's Division of Investment Management, has determined that any
proposal to obtain shareholder approval of an investment company's
investment advisory contract with a new investment adviser, which
approval is required by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended
(``1940 Act''),\7\ and the rules thereunder, will be deemed to be a
``matter which may affect substantially the rights or privileges of
such stock'' for purposes of Exchange Rule 452 so that a member
organization may not give a proxy to vote shares registered in its name
absent instruction from the beneficial holder of the shares. As a
result, for example, a member organization may not give a proxy to vote
shares registered in its

name, absent instruction from the beneficial holder of the shares, on
any proposal to obtain shareholder approval required by the 1940 Act of
an investment advisory contract between an investment company and a new
investment adviser due to an assignment of the investment company's
investment advisory contract, including an assignment caused by a
change in control of the investment adviser that is party to the
assigned contract.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 80a et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements under Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \8\ that an
exchange have rules that are designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and paragraph (f)(1) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder \10\ as constituting a stated policy, practice, or
interpretation with respect to the meaning, administration, or
enforcement of an existing Exchange rule. At any time within 60 days of
the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1).
    \11\ The effective date of the original proposed rule change is
September 2, 2005 and the effective date of Amendment No. 2 is
September 28, 2005. For purposes of calculating the 60-day period
within which the Commission may summarily abrogate the proposed rule
change, as amended, under Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the
Commission considers the period to commence on September 28, 2005,
the date on which the Exchange submitted Amendment No. 2. See 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NYSE-2005-61 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-9303. All submissions should refer to File Number
SR-NYSE-2005-61. This file number should be included on the subject
line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission
will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent

amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the Commission, and all written
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public
Reference Room. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2005-61 and should be
submitted on or before November 4, 2005.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-5646 Filed 10-13-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43960-43961]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19985]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP17-1036-000.
    Applicants: Stagecoach Pipeline & Storage Company LL.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Stagecoach Pipeline & Storage
Company LLC--Remove Expired Agreements to be effective 10/15/2017.

    Filed Date: 9/11/17.
    Accession Number: 20170911-5061.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-1037-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 09/11/17 Negotiated Rates--
Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc. H-2275-89 to be effective 11/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/11/17.
    Accession Number: 20170911-5063.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-1038-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 09/11/17 Negotiated Rates--
Freepoint Commodities LLC R-7250-19 to be effective 11/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/11/17.
    Accession Number: 20170911-5102.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 12, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
 Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-19985 Filed 9-19-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: August 23, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 163)]
[Notices]
[Page 48270-48271]
[DOCID:fr23au07-56]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0778; FRL-8459-1]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial
and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters (Renewal); EPA ICR Number
2028.03, OMB Control Number 2060-0551

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR which is abstracted below describes the
nature of the collection and the estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before September 24,
2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2006-0778, to (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), or by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:

EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency,
Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center, mail code
2201T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB
at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Learia Williams, Compliance Assessment
and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail Code 2223A,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:
(202) 564-0050; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On October 5, 2006 (71 FR 58853), EPA sought comments on this
ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any
additional comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB
within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0778, which is available for public viewing
online at http://www.regulations.gov, or, in person viewing at the

Enforcement and Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC),
EPA West, Room B 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket Center is
(202) 566-1752.

http://www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the

index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, as EPA

receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose public disclosure
is restricted by statute. For further information about the electronic
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov.

    Title: NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Boilers
and Process Heaters (Renewal).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2028.03, OMB Control Number 2060-0551.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on August 31, 2007.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial and Institutional
Boilers and Process Heaters (40 CFR part 63, subpart DDDDD) were
proposed on January 13, 2003, and promulgated on December 6, 2006.
    This regulation applies to new, reconstructed, or existing
industrial, commercial and institutional boilers and process heaters
that are a major source of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) emissions. A
major source of HAP emissions is any stationary source or group of
stationary sources located within a contiguous area and under common
control that emits or has the potential to emit any single HAP at a
rate of 9.07 megagrams (10 tons) or more per year or any combination of
HAP at a rate of 22.68 megagrams (25 tons) or more per year.
    Owners/operators of industrial, commercial and institutional
boilers and process heaters facilities are required to submit initial
notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports. Respondents are
also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any
startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected
facility, or any period during which the monitoring system is
inoperative. Semiannual reports are also required. These notifications,
reports, and records are essential in determining compliance; and are
required, in general, of all sources subject to NESHAP.
    Any owner or operator subject to the provisions of this part shall
maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least
five years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports
and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local
authority. In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the
reports are sent directly to the EPA regional office. This information
is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart
DDDDD, as authorized in section 112 and 114(a) of the Clean Air Act.
The required information consists of emissions data and other
information that have been determined to be private.
    An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control number for EPA's
regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15, and are
identified on the form and/or instrument, if applicable.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 86
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Industrial, commercial and
institutional boilers and process heaters facilities.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,625.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, semiannually and occasionally.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 513,995.
    Estimated Total Costs: $74,783,461, which includes $10,780,000
annualized Capital Startup costs, $18,220,800 annualized Operations &
Maintenance (O&M) costs, and $45,783,461 annualized Labor costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: The number of responses subject to the
standard is estimated to be 5,974. The number of responses in the
previous ICR was 18,788. During the initial compliance period a large
number of facilities were required to determine whether they were
subject to the standard. Most were not subject and no additional
reporting is required, therefore, a large reduction in the number of
affected facilities occurred. There is an adjustment decrease of
636,250 hours in the total estimated burden hours as currently
identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens. This decrease
is not due to any program changes. The change in the burden has
occurred because the initial performance tests and the initial reports
for existing sources have been completed and submitted to the Agency.
The relatively small number of new sources causes a small increase in
burden hours. However, the net overall effect is a decrease in the
number of burden hours.
    There is an increase in the capital/startup and operation and
maintenance (O&M) cost compared to the previous ICR. The reason for
this increase is due to the fact that this renewal ICR incurred O&M
costs as compared with the active ICR that included primarily capital/
startup costs. There is also an increase of 289 additional new sources
per year over the next three years of this ICR. The net effect is an
increase in cost to the subject facilities.

    Dated: August 14, 2007.
Sara Hisel-McCoy,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E7-16698 Filed 8-22-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 227 (Monday, November 25, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64953-64954]
[FR Doc No: 2019-25422]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2019-0089]

Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    Under part 211 of title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this
document provides the public notice that on October 28, 2019, Norfolk
Southern Corporation (NS), petitioned the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) for a waiver of compliance from certain provisions
of the Federal railroad safety regulations contained at 49 CFR part
231, Railroad Safety Appliance Standards. Specifically, NS seeks relief
from Sec.  231.6(a)(3)(i) for a designated series of NS maintenance-of-
way (MW) flat cars (NS 980011, NS 986906, CR 62753, CR 58574, CR 58568,
CR 58535, CR 58515, CR 58563, and CR 58708). FRA assigned the petition
Docket Number FRA-2019-0089.
    In line with the requirements of Sec.  231.6(a)(3)(i), on June 15,
1998, FRA issued Technical Bulletin MP&E 98-69, Safety Appliance
Arrangements on Flat Cars, recommending an additional handhold for any
flat car with a low-mounted side hand brake to allow for the safe
operation of the hand brake while the car is in motion. NS seeks relief
to permit these MW cars to remain in service with their current hand
brake arrangement and without the additional handhold outlined in MP&E
98-69.
    NS indicates it will not operate the hand brake on these MW cars
while the cars are in motion. NS states that these cars have had a
long-standing service life with no detriment to the hand brake
operation. NS contends that the supplemental handholds, as outlined in
MP&E 98-69, could obstruct the loading or unloading of track equipment.
NS posits that this could result in damage

to the additional handholds any time the car is loaded or unloaded.
    NS explains that the subject cars are currently stenciled ``MW'' as
per 49 CFR 215.305, and they will remain in that dedicated service. NS
states it will add additional stenciling with the words ``DO NOT
OPERATE HANDBRAKE WHILE CAR IS IN MOTION'' in the area of the hand
brake. NS states it will add a handling message on the NS Internal
Alert System notifying persons that the hand brakes on these cars
cannot be operated while the cars are in motion.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation's (DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey Ave.
SE, W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Operations Facility is
open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
Holidays.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested parties
desire an opportunity for oral comment and a public hearing, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
     Website: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
    Communications received by January 9, 2020 will be considered by
FRA before final action is taken. Comments received after that date
will be considered if practicable.
    Anyone can search the electronic form of any written communications
and comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better
inform its processes. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including
any personal information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/
ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. See also https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice for the
privacy notice of regulations.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
John Karl Alexy,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety, Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019-25422 Filed 11-22-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


u. No. A 79 15 Item No. XD43 2 Dra$ Post MACT Screening Risk Assessmentfor the Coke Oven Source Category i I Facility Emission Calculations B 1 Sources for Coke Oven EmissionsData:

Batteries:

Revised battery emissions estimates provided by Roy Huntley @ PA, OAQPS). 9/ 7/ 2000.

Pushing/ Quenching/ Combustion/ By ProductChemical Plant ( Process Equipment):

Revised Emissions for Coke Oven Facilities, JCF Memorandum dated 8/ 21/ 2000, Table: Summary of Allowable Emissions from Coke Oven Facilities.

By product Plant ( Fugitive Equipment Leak):

Revised Fugitive Emission Calculations, ICF Memorandum dated 8/ 3 1/ 2000, Table: Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Chemical Plants. Based on telephone conversation with Roy Huntley and Ted Palma on 9/ 12/ 2000, average emission factors ( column 3) were used for all facilities except Ashland. Monitored emissions data are for Ashland ( column 4). Revised Battery Emissions Estimates Provided by Roy Huntley. ( EPA, OAQPS), 9/ 7/ 00 E

rGjo25: m/ m 2 2

~

sY m 00 9922 00 9922 004922 0 0 92 ~ 00 pa E . I m E co E C . r 113 113  E w n c f CA 5 b0 NO 0 boo  d 3  0 "!" 22 N 00 00 0 M E Itpm f U   c) me CJm N N . L ICF CONS U LTlN G August 21,2000 Mr. Ted Palma USEPA Emission Standards Division Risk & Exposure Assessment Group MD 13 RTP, NC Re: Revised Emissions Estimates for Coke Oven Facilities Dear Mr. Palma:

ICF Consulting ( ICF) appreciates the opportunity to support EPA s residual risk assessment project for the coke oven source category. Enclosed are the revised calculations of emission rates and modeling parameters. The revisions reflect throughput changes and other site specific parameters obtained from COETF/ ACCCI. The revisions also reflect our discussions during the June 14~ and August 16* meetings.

The following are enclosed:

FaciIity wide emissions 0 Summary of emissions from batteries 0 Summary of pushing/ quenching/ combustion emissions 0 Summary of byproduct chemical plant emissions 0 Modeling parameters 0 Supporting documentation I am e mailing you all disk files used for the above calculations. Ifyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at ( 919) 233 0382.

Sincerely,  ; ....  . \

, ; .(

. . i Dib Paul, P. E. Project Manager Encl dP EXKl Lee Highway  Fairtar VA 22031 1207USA  703 934 3300 703 934 3740fax  w,. icfconsulting. com .................... EMISSIONS SUMMARY .. ._' .: ,

....... . . ........

.............. ..

.: :.

_._._.^__ ..... ...... . ,., . ............. :.......... .. .. .....

. ,._;. . . ... ........ .' .'$.... ...... . . . ....

... ._ . .

y ..' .. . a._ :

, ;.

... ... . i. .

L . ....

. ... .... ..... . a.: .........,:. .......... ........

. .,... .........

.. .......... * i ... .. 1 ...<:.;... ... _. :. ..... .. ......... . . ., .... .. Summary of BSO Emission Rates for Doors, Lids, Offtakes, and Charging Actual and Allowable Emissions Recovery Ovens AK Steel, Ashland Erie Coke, Erie Gulf States Steel, Gadsden New Boston, Portsmouth Tonananda, Buffalo NOTE :  Batter  3 3 4 A B 2 3 2 2  Total Actual EJ ssions, lbhr ( 1) Total Allowable I sissions, lbhr ( 2 Visible & Non Visible Door Visible & Non Visible Door visible Door Leaks Only visible Door LeaksOnly Leaks Leaks 1.4837 0.1434 1.7134 0.4207 1.4913 0.1528 1.7134 0.4207 1,3736 0.1408 1.5782 0.3875 0.4488 0.0429 0.5185 0.1273 0.6732 0.0527 0.7891 0.1937 0.9381 0.0705 1.1047 0.2712 1.2240 0.1136 1.4203 0.3487 1.4146 0.1890 1.5782 0.3875 1.1892 0.1372 1.3527 ' 0.3321 ( 1) Total actual emissions from doors, lids, ofFtakes, and charging. Actual emissionsare based on Method 303 inspectiondata.

( 2) Total allowable emissions from'doors, lids, offtakes, and charging. Allowable emissions are based onMACT emissionlimitsfor existing by productbatteries.

Battery Emissions  Batlay Leaks Summary Provided by: Dib PaulnCF 8/ 21/ 00 1153 AM u)

. Irl ai a . 0

Q > 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 r co C 0 c . Q C Q U Q a r U c Q ai Y 8 c Q)

E PI 8 J U g 0 L > r 4)

Y 8 Q)

. u)

t a > 0 2 a > 0 0 2 i 0 c u) Q ai 15 5  n n ( L1 c 0 c II a z E J In \ .

Summary of Actual Benzene Emissions Fugitive Equipment Leak At By Product Chemical Plant Company AK Steel AK Steel Erie Coke Gulf States Steel New Boston Coke Tonawanda Coke NOTE: ~

Actual Benzene Actual Benzene Location Emissions, lblyr Emissions, lblhr Middletown, OH 0 0.0000 Ashland, KY 2,007 0.2292 Erie, PA 0.06 0.0000 Gadsden, AL 48 0.0055 New Boston, OH 20 0.0023 Tonawanda. NY 1 0 0001 Revisedemissions estimates based on screening factors in " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995, Table C 3.

For Ashland, detailed monitoring report was available by month, quarter, semi annual, and annual. For components that leaked above 500 ppmv, it was assumed leak occurred for the entire monitoringperiod.

For Gulf States Steel, revised emissions estimates are from the COETF field study report.

For other facilities, emissions estimates were based on one cycle of monitoring only.

Ib/ hr = Ib/ yr / 8760 ICF Consutting fugitive emissions Dib Paul 1 8R1m 3.92 PM MODELING PARAMETERS ......... :.: .. ..... .__... I ........... + . .., .. .......... , I .: :,. ; ,. . i. ...... ..... . ._ .:: .... . , ...

.. . . ... . ... ~.., ....

.. ,. ..... .... .:.. ..... .. , ,: ,. . . .. .__ ......................... l._. ............. ............ ... .. . . , .... .. I?..... ...... . . ,. ... ... . ..._.. .. .....

.,

................ ..... Summary of Buoyancy Flux Calculations Total Buoyancy Flux, Company Location Battery m4Is3 NOTE:

( 1) Emissions estimatessubmitted by ICF in May 2000.

( 2) Emissions estimates revised by ICF based on throughput changes.

See Appendix B for revised estimates of buoyancy flux.

ICF Consulting flux summary Dib Paul 1of1 819Ax) 11: 36AM 0 L vi c .

m 3  0 m 0  al E" ( D VI L e  VI

x i5 E I . c u t al a  0 e al al f 0 m 2 3 U al c u m ( D al s         Quench Tower Flow Calculation AK Steel, MiddletownlOH Water flow per quench Time per quench Make up water % of make upwater to steam Quench temperature Diameter of quench tower Quench tower stack flow Quench tower velocity NOTE: 5,200 gal 82 secs 2,250 gal  50 % 1,125 gal  220 deg F 14 ft 189,244 acfm Note 1 Note 1 Note 2 Note 3 Note 4 Note 1 Sample calcutation 1 Sample calculation 2 Note 5 1. From site data or Lula Melton's spreadsheet titled " cokesurvey. xIs". 2. Use 50% of quench flow where not available. 3. Engineering assumption. 4. Assumed slightly superheated vapor, based on discussion with ACCCI representatives. To simplify calculations, assumed ideal gas. 5. Use length x width where quench tower is rectangular.

Sample calculation: 1. 1,125 gal 1/ 82s 60dmin 8.34 Ib/ gal * Ibmole/ l8 Ib * 359 ft3/ lbmole 2. 189,244 acfm / ( 3.14 14A2ft2/ 4)/( 60 s/ min)

ICF Consulting Dib Paul I ( 460 i 220)/( 460 + 32)

quench flow  Middm OH 8/ 21100 10: 27 AM i_ SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR ._

BATTERY. EMISSIONS.

,. ,. ..:.: :.

...

........

.. ,. . .. .... ,. .......... . : y:. .

....... ... .  ._..,. I,.

.. , .. .,

...... ..... :,.. I ......... vz+ :.....* r...... ... i . . ..::,. sic .. ..., . . ,. . ,.. ....... : .....$ i;* n .. .. . I ... ...

I.

.. ...

. .. d ..

... . ....... ..= ... 1. . .

i.. ... ....... ::<:. .. .^_ ..~ . .. ... .... .. . i.. ... .... A. .... ......

* ..

........ .... .. .. .... .., ...._ . ........ .... __. f. I). .._. i_.._.: ....... .~ .. .. .. i_ 1....... . ,:. ..... .. , . .... om E . C om r. U 6 & ISI E 0 . I m m . I E w 0 2 L;

Y . a k e c m E a ... L ..... .... .... . . . ..: .. . ' ...... .... ..... 1..~...,. ,. ........ . .

...... ..

.. BY PRODUCT CHEMIC .. .. .::..::..... . .. ._... .. ......

"' '. " PROCESS EQUIPMENT E .......... ................ ....... . . ..... ...... . ... .. .. ..... . .__..' .___. ._ "_....... :. ........ _..._ _........ , .... ,.

I.

:.....'> C .. : .....>.

._.. ................. ... , . : .: : .

....... .^_ ....... ... ._

......... 2.:

;.<:, *:* L. S.'_.._

,. i, i ,'."... .:_....... ........ .......... *:. . . I. .

... ...

.......... .. ... .._ ........

.. .,;,. ....>.........

. . I. . .,. .. . I'

........ ..

....... ,. .(

._.._ . . . .. .... .... .' .:. ,

..... .............. ....

.., . ... .

~

.. ~

......._. ....

...

.... i.. I ... ... ,'. G ..... ... .,.. I, .... ...... . ci. v:::: ... . :, ....... .......... ., ..,_.. ,. .:;..,.: ... ............: .

.

..

..

, .. ... .. ....... , ..

..

...

........ _._.......

,.

.. ... .. .....

......... .. .. ....

,.. ... . . .. , . . .:.. . .. ~.. .: . . . .. .

...

....::,. ............. ... :. ... .... . ... ._...... .. ? ................... :.,*........ I Gas No. of Source Blanketing Units   ( YeslNo)

Tar decanter 2 Yes Tar intercepting Yes sump Tardewatenng rank Yes lar storage tank 1 Yes Flushingliquor Yes circulationtank Excess ammonia liquor 4 Yes tank Wash oil 1 Yes decanter Total ( Iblyr) I NOTE: Calculated Calculated Ap 42 Source Dia Or Tank Benzene Method of Benzene EmissionSource Height ( ft)   LengthMTidth Orientation Emis* lons Factortft)@ J orimert) (~ yr)  ) Calc.   ( lbrYr) ) 42 factors ( Ibfion) ( 4)

~ eenexlpage 1 ~ eenespage HO~ 1304 MassTransfer 931 0.002200 11 47 x 10 Horu 1524 AP 42 161 0.000380 , 10 10 dia x 22 Horn 7 TANKS 356 o. ooo84o 40 56.5 dia Vert 53 TANKS 322 O. WO760 10 10 dia x 35 Hoe 0 Nobenzene 220 oooo52o data Seenexlpage Seenextpage Vert i52 AP 42 24 0.000056 10 10 dta x 32 Horn 64 AP 42 63 0. m150 L 3. i04 . zms 1 1) Multiple units are assumed to be operatingin parallel. 2) Diameter if cylindrical tank: length and width ifrectangular tank. See atiached sheet for dimensions of multiple units. 3) Benzene emission rate calculated by site using TANKS or AP 42. 4) benzene emission rate calculatedby ICF using Furnace Plant Draft AP 42 Qted Feb  99, TaMe 12.2 19. For tar intercepting sump with psblanketing, 98% control efficiency was used per Ron Myers  recommendation,

Actual facility throughput for operating year 1998 = 423.252 tons/ yr Sample calculation: Benzene emissions = AP 42 factor, lbhon of coke pushed   actual facility coke throughput, tonslyr .. .

ICF Conruning Prepared4. Siie Updaled w. Dib Paul 1 Of1 4 * 0 3 U 0 6 7 ib 5F 2 C ui r C a Q n  I a E L 0 ( 0  0 a f E e L  P Q f F L 0 c m 0) m n I1 ' . *. L 3 Q P n .. .. ..... ..

....... ......... * ........... .. ..

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATIONFOR "'. . ' . .. .......... ...................... . I. ... _. _<.... ...... ..._.... , .,:,.., . r.. . . ... .. ..<,<:,*..>. . . BY PRODUCTCHEMICAL" PL ... .. .,.. i ., ... .... . . .,;. . .... . . . ......... ..

<. .. .. , . , . ,. ... , . >:... $

......

. . ..

.. ..

...

.,

.......... I..... .. ... '. i. Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By Product Plants Equipment Type Default Zero Pegged Emission Rates, Correlation Equation, Emission Rate, kglhrlsource ( 4) kglhrlsource ( 5) kglhrlsource ( 3)

Own ended Line NOTE: ( 1) Emission factors are from " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995, Table ( 2 3.

( 2) These emission factors are for refineries, marketing terminals, and oil and gas production. Based on a 1980 study, EPA concluded that the use of refinery data to characterize coke by product fugitive emissions was reasonable.

( 3) This factor is used when the leak detection monitor consistently shows 0 readings.

( 4) These factors are used when the leak detection monitor trips due to excessive hydrocarbon concentration beyond the detection range of the monitor.

( 5) SV = screening value in ppmv as detected by the leak detection monitor ICF Consuiting fugitive emissions Dib Paul 1 8/ 1 ID3 2130PM .:

AK Steel, MiddletownlOH Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant NOTE: Fugitive equipment leaks were not calculated as the plant has no light oil recovery. There are no components in light oil service. Therefore, emissions are negligible or not quantifiable.

Dib Paul fugitive emissions ICF Consulting 1 8111a 2: 20 PM I AK Steel, Ashlandlm I Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant ' Total benzene emissions Benzene emissions from non leaking components Benzene emissions from leaking components Total benzene emissions Dib Paul fugitive emissions ICF, Consutting 1 8/ 18rw 12: 03 PM AK Steel, AshlandlKY Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from ByProduct Plant Emissions from non leaking components Stream( 1) Benzene Mass Type of No. of Zero Default Zero Benzene Fraction ( 2) Equipment Reading Emission Emissions, Components Rate, Iblyr ( 5) ( 3) kglhrlsource 141 Light oil ( liquid or vapor) 75% Pump 4 2.40E 05 1.39 Flange 46 3.1 OE 07 0.21 Valves 93 7.80E 06 10.51 Open End 30 2.00E 06 0.87 Rich wash oil 3% Pump 2 2.40E 05 0.03 Flange 10 3.10E 07 0.00 Valves 116 7.80E 06 0.52 Open End 21 2.00E 06 0.02 Lean wash oil 0.14% Pump 3 2.40E 05 0.00 Flange 10 3.1 OE 07 0.00 Valves 131 7.80E 06 0.03 Open End 19 2.00E 06 0.00 Total Emissions, Ib/ yr 14 NOTE: ( 1) For process streams in benzene service ( e. g., light oil liquid, light oil vapor, etc.) ( 2) Compositions from site. ( 3) Component count, and no. of zero leaking components from site. It was assumed that a component with less than 500 ppmv screening value was not leaking. ( 4) Default zero emission factors for TOC are from " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995, Table C 3. ( 5) Benzene emissions = Default zero factor, kg/ hr/ component 1/ 0.4536 kgllb no. of components * 8760 hrs/ yr * wt fraction benzene Dib Paul fugitive emissions ICF Consulting 1 811lrw)  22PM Erie Coke Corporation Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant Sb eam( 1) Benzene Mass Type of No. of Zero Default Zero Benzene Fraction ( 2) Equipment Reading Emission Emissions, Components Rate, lblyr ( 5) ( 3) kglhrlsource 141 CO Gas 1% Valves 42 7.80E 06 0.06 Other 2 4.00E 06 0.00 Total Emissions, Ib/ yr 0.06 NOTE: ( 1) For process streams in benzene service ( e. g., light oil liquid, light oil vapor, etc.) ( 2) Compositions from site. ( 3) Component count, and no. of zero leaking components from site. It was assumed that a component with less than 500 ppmv screening value was not leaking. ( 4) Default zero emission factors for TOC are from " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995, Table C 3. ( 5) Benzene emissions = Defautt zero factor, kg/ hr/ component * 1/ 0.4536 kg/ lb * no. of components * 8760 hrslyr * wt fraction benzene Dib Paul ICF Consulting 1 fugitiv emissions M1100 218 PM New BostonlOH Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By Product Plant Stream( 1) Benzene Mass Type of No. of Zero Default Zero Benzene Fraction ( 2) Equipment Reading Emission Emissions, Components Rate, lblyr ( 5) ( 3) kglhrlsource f41 Light oil ( liquid or vapor) 67% Pump 9 2.40E 05 2.79 Flange 848 3.1OE 07 3.40 Valves 122 7.8OE 06 12.31 Open End 72 2.00E 06 1.86 CO Gas 10% Other 8 4.00E 06 0.06 Total Emissions, Ib/ yr 20 NOTE: ( 1) For process, streams in benzene service ( e. g., light oil liquid, light oil vapor, etc.) ( 2) Compositions from site. ( 3) Component count, and no. of zero leaking components from site. It was assumed that a component with less than 500 ppmv screening value was not leaking. ( 4) Default zero emission factors for TOC are from " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995, Table C 3. ( 5) Benzene emissions = Defautt zero factor, kg/ hr/ component 110.4536 kgllb no. of components * 8760 h& yr wt fraction benzene Dib Paul fugitii emissii ICF Consulting 1 811l/ W 237 PM TonawandalNY Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant Stream( 1) Benzene Mass Type of No. of Zero Default Zero Benzene Fraction ( 2) Equipment Reading Emission Emissions, Components Rate, Iblyr ( 5) ( 3) kglhrlsource 141 Light oil ( liquid or vapor) 65% Pump 1 2.40E 05 Flange 2 3.1 OE 07 Valves 7 ' 7.80 E 06 Open End 1 2.00E 06 CO Gas 1% Other 3 4.00E 06 Valves 35 ' 7.80E 06 Total Emissions, Ib/ yr NOTE: ( 1) For process streams in benzene service ( e. g., light oil liquid, light oil vapor, etc.) ( 2) Compositionsfrom site. 0.30 0.01 0.69 0.03 0.00 0.05 1 ( 3) Component count, and no. of zero leaking componentsfrom site. It was assumed that a component with less than 500 ppmv screening value was not leaking. ( 4) Default zero emission factors for TOC are from " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995, Table C 3. ( 5) Benzene emissions = Default zero factor, kg/ hr/ component V0.4536 kg/ lb * no. of components 8760 hrs/ yr * wt fraction benzene Dib Paul fugitii emissions ICF Consulting 1 8Ill~ 1 58PM ICF CONSULTING August 3 1,2000 Mr. Ted Palma USEPA Emission Standards Division Risk & Exposure Assessment Group MD 13 RTP, NC Re: Revised Fugitive Emission Calculations Dear Mr. Palma:

ICF Consulting ( ICF) appreciates the opportunity to support EPA s residual risk assessment project for the coke oven source category. Enclosed are the revised calculations of emission rates from fugitive equipment leaks. As suggested during our August 28* meeting, I have completed emission calculations for the following scenarios:

COETF factors AP 42factors EPA average emission factors EPA Lemo leak factors EPA default/ pegging/ correlationfactors All components leaking at 250 ppmv ( half of 500 ppmv leak level).

I am e mailing you disk files for the above calculations. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at ( 919) 233 0382.

Sincerely,

~ ilb Paul, P. E. Project Manager Encl dP 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax. VA 22031 1207 USA  703 934 3000  703 934 3740fax  www. icfconsulting. com u)

0 L P  P a E . 0 u). U j. E 3 cW u)

a2  U E 3 0) ; 5 0E 0 0 2 hl c 0* iia LE r: 10  J E s 9 U ( D Q u) m n C . .

I10 ' 8 u) u) ([ I Q Y 8 n .. ... ... ... . .. I. ... . .. ... .... .... . ., .. ..... . ,: .... ............... ....... ~ *., .__ .... ....... : ;, I. . . ..... ,. . .... .. ... .. ,_

...

... Summary of Benzene Emissions Fugitive Equipment Leak At By product Chemical Plant ( Based on Average Emission Factors).

NOTE: Emission factors are based on Table 2 2 of " Protocolfor Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1.995.

lblhr = Ib/ yr / 8760 ICF Consulting fugitii average factor Dib Paul 1 801100 105" AM AK Steel, MiddletownlOH : Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant Average Emission Factors Type of Equipment Benzene Mass No. of Average Fraction Components Emission Factor, kglhrlsource ( 1)

Pump 0.14% 2 1.14E 01 Flange a5 2.50E 04 Valves 74 1.09E 02 Connector 3 2.50E 04 Other 61 1SOE 02 NOTE: ( 1) Emission factors are based on Table 2 2 of " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995.

( 2) Benzene emissions'= emission factor, kg/ hr/ component * 1/ 0.4536 kgllb no. of components * 8760 hrdyr * benzene wt fraction Dib Paul ICF Consulting 1 Benzene Emissions, Iblyr ( 2)

,

6.1644 0.5745 21.8081 0.0203 24.7389 53.3062 fugitive averagefactor 8131lOD 10.32 AM AK Steel, AshlandIKY Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant Average Emission Factors Rich wash oil 3% Pump 3 1.14E 01 198 Flange 10 2.50E 04 I Valves 116 1.09E 02 733 Open End 21 2.30E 03 28 Lean wash oil Pump I 3 1.14E 01 9 0.14% Flange f 10 2.50E 04 0 I Valves 131 1.09E 02 39 Open End 19 2.30E 03 1 I I I otal Emissions, lblyr I I ! ! 25,114 NOTE: ( 1) Emissionfactors are based on Table 2 2 of   Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates , EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kg/ hr/ component V0.4536 kg/ lb * no. of components * 8760 hrs/ yr * benzene wt fraction Dib Paul fugitive averagefactor ICF Consulting 1 8Blm 1039 AM Erie Coke Corporation Emissions from By Product Plant Average Emission Factors Stream Type of No. of Emission Factor Benzene Benzene Mass Fraction Equipment Components ( 1). kglhrlsource Emissions, I blyr ( 2)

C. O. Gas Exhauster 2 1.60E 01 62 C. O. Gas < I% Valves 42 2.68E 02 217 Total Emissions, lblyr 279 NOTE: ( 1) Emission factors are based on Table 2 2of " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453lR 95 017, November 1995. Factors for gas were used.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kg/ hr/ component 1/ 0.4536 kgllb * no. of components * 8760 hrslyr * benzene wt fraction Dib Paul ICF Consulting 1 Gulf StatesSteel Emissions from ByProduct Plant Average Emission Factors Stream Benzene Mass Fraction Liquid 62% 67%

C. O. Gas 89% 31% 100% 100% .

1oD%

Total Emissions, Ib& r NOTE: Type of No. of Emission Factor Benzene Equipment Components ( 11, kgfhrlsource Emissions,

Flange Connector Valve Flange Connector Flange ( Leaking) Valve Open Ended Line lblyr ( 2)

191 2.50E 04 553 181 2.50E 04 542 83 1.09E 02 11,706 146 2.50E 04 627 112 2.50E 04 168 9 2.50E 04 43 115 2.68E 02 59,520 18 2.30E 03 800 73,959 ( 1) Emission factors are based on Table 2 2 of " Protocolfor Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453R 95517, November 1995.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kglhrlcomponent V0.4536 kgnb no. of Components* 8760 hrstyr benzene wt fraction Dib Paul fugitive averaodactm ICF Consulting 1 8/ 31/ 00  10: 49 AM New Boston Coke Corp. Emissions from By product Plant Average Emission Factors Stream Benzene Mass Fraction Type of No. of Emission Factor Benzene Equipment Components ( l), kghrlsource Emissions,

Liquid 67% Valve Open End Flangedconnectoi Pumps C. O. Gas 10% Pres. Relief Total Emissions, Ib/ yr NOTE: 122 72 848 9 8 lbhr I21 ID9E 02 17,206 2.30E 03 2,143 2.50E 04 2.743 1.14E 01 13,276 1.60E 01 2,472 37,840 ( 1) Emissionfactors are basedon Table 2 2 of " Protocolfor Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA453/ R% o17, November 1%.

( 2) Benzeneemissions = emissionfactor, kqlhrlcomponent 1D. 4536 kg/ lb no. of components * 8760 hdyr benzene wt fradon Db Paul fugitive awmpfacttor IC5 Consulting 1 8/ 31/ 00  1053AM Tonawanda Coke Corporation Emissions from By Product Plant Average Emission Factors Stream Benzene Mass Fraction Type of No. of Equipment Components Liquid 65% Pump Flange Valve )? 36 Open End C. O. Gas 4% Exhauster Pres. Relief Valves Total Emissions, lblyr NOTE: ( 1) Emissionfactors are based on Table 2 2 of " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA453R 95 017, November 1995.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kglhricomponent" V0.4536 kgAb no. of components 8760 hrslyr benzene wt fraction Emission Factor Benzene ( 11, kglhrlsource Emissions, lblyr ( 21 1 1.14E 01 1,431 2 2.50E 04 6 7 1.09E 02 958 1 2.30E 03 29 2 1.60E 01 62 1 1.60E 01 31 35 2.68E 02 181 2,698 Oib Paul fugitive average factor ICF Consulting 1 8/ 31/ 00 1056 AM e. . .

. ...................... ,<....,. ....*. ......... .. .... .... . ,.* , ...~. .... ........ ...... . .

. ., . .......

.. .. .. <. .. i . .

.. .. .. .. ............ .... .....

........ ....

.... ..,, . ....... . .... . .

BY PRODUCT CHEMICAL ..

....       Summary of Benzene Emissions Fugitive Equipment Leak At By product Chemical Plant ( Based on AP 42 Factors)

Benzene Emissions, Benzene Emissions, Company Location AK Steel Middletown, OH AK Steel Ashland. KY ~

. Erie Coke IErie, PA '

Gulf States Steel IGadxlen. AL ..  New Boston Coke ( New Boston, OH ITonawanda Coke ITonawanda. NY NOTE: iblyr I I I Emissionfactors are based on Draft AP 42 Table 12.2 21.

Ib/ hr = Ib/ yr I 8760 ICF Consulting Dib Paul 1 lblhr 78 8.90E 03 31.949 3.65E+ 00 1061 ~ f~~;~~ l 129.531I .. __ .

153,0421 1.75E+ 01 2.7921 3.19E 01I 1ugitiie AP42_ emissions 8/ 31100 9: 17AM AK Steel, MiddletownlOH Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By  Product Plant Stream( 1) Benzene Mass Type of No. of AP 42 Factor, Benzene Fraction ( 2) Equipment Components VOC lblday ( 4) Emissions, ( 3) lblvr ( 5)

Lean wash oil 0.14% Pump Flange Valves Connector Other Total Emissions, Ib/ yr NOTE: 2 6.00E+ 00 6.13E+ 00 85 5.70E 01 2.48E+ 01 74 5.70E 01 2.1 6E+ 01 3 5.70E 01 8.74E 01 61 7.90E 01 2.46E+ 01 1) All componentswere assumedto be in lean wash oil service. 2) Benzene stream composition is in mass basis. 3) Component count from site. 4) DraftAP 42, Table 12.2 21, lblday VOC emission factors for less than quarterly inspections. For flanges, the factor for valves was used. 5) Benzene emissions, Iblyr = AP 42 factor, Ib/ day VOC benzene mass fraction * no. of components 365 days/ yr Dib Paul fugitiie AP42 ernissions ICF Consulting 1 8131a 9~ 59 AM 78 AK Steel, AshlandlKY Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant ( Using AP 42 factors with no monitoring data)

Stream( 1) Benzene Mass Type of No. of AP 42 Factor, Benzene Fraction( 2) Equipment Components VOC Ib/ day ( 4) Emissions, ( 3) I blyr ( 5)

Light oil ( liquid or vapor)

Rich wash oil Lean wash oil ~

Total Emissions, Ib/ yr NOTE: 75% Pump Flange Valves Open End 3% Pump Flange Valves Open End 0.14% Pump Flange Valves Open End 5 6 8,213 46 0.57 7,178 93 0.57 14,511 30 0.12 986 3 6 197 10 0.57 62 116 0.57 724 21 ,0.12 28 3 6 9 10 0.57 3 131 0.57 38 19 0.12 1 31,949 1) For process streams in benzene service ( e. g., light oil liquid, light oil vapor, etc.) 2) Benzene stream composition is in mass basis. 3) Component count from site. 4) Drafl AP 42, Table 12.2 21, Iblday VOC emission factors for less than quarterly inspections. For flanges, the factor for valves was used. 5) Benzene emissions, Ib/ yr = AP 42 factor, lb/ day VOC * benzene mass fraction * no. of components 365 days/ yr Dib Paul fugitive AP 42 emissions ICF Consulting 1 8B11M) lQl7AM I Erie Coke Corporation Emissions from By product Plant ( Using AP42 factors with no monitoring data)

Stream(') Benzene Mass Type of Fraction'') Equipment % C. O. Gas < I Exhauster C. O. Gas < I% Valves Total Emissions, lblyr NOTE: No. of AP 42 Factor Benzene VOC, lblday Emissions, comp~ nents'~~ Ib/ yr '' I 2 2.6 42 0.57 a7 106 1) For process streams in benzene service ( e. g., light oil liquid, light oil vapor, etc.) 2) Benzene stream composition is in mass basis. 3) Component count from site. 4) Draft AP 42, Table 12.2 21, lblday VOC emission factors for less than quarterly inspections. For flanges, the factor for valves was used. 5) Benzene emissions = AP 42 factor, Iblday VOC benzene mass fraction no. of components 365 days/ yr Dib Paul fugitiie AP42 ernissions ICF Consulting 1 8/ 3oAx) 428 PM 19 Gulf States Steel Emissions from By product Plant ( Using AP 42 Factors with nomonitoring data)

Benzene Mass No. of AP42 Factor ' I, Benzene Stream"' Fraction"' Type of Equipment Com ponents '' 1 voc, lb/ day Emissions, lbly ( 5)

Liquid 60% 0.57 23,843 Flange I 191 I 62% 67Yo C. O. Gas 89% 31% I Flange I Connector 146 1 I 0.57 II 27,034 10,012 100%

~

100% Valve 23,926 100% Open Ended Line 0.12 ' otal Emissions, lblyr 129.531 NOTE: 1) For process streams in benzene service ( e. g., light oil liquid, light oil vapor, etc.) 2) Bewene stream composition is in mass basis. 3) Component count from site. 4) Draft AP 42, Table 12.2 21, Iblday VOC emission factors for less than quarterly inspections. For flanges, the factor for valves was used. 5) Benzene emissions = AP 42 factor, Iblday VOC benzene massfraction * no. of components * 365 dayslyr Dib Paul fugitive AP42 emissions ICF Consulting 1 8m  436PM New Boston Coke Corp. Emissions from By product Plant ( Using AP 42 factors with no monitoring data)

Stream( 1) Benzene Mass Type of No. of AP 42 Factor Benzene Fraction( 2) Equipment Components ( 3) ( 4), VOC, Emissions,

Liquid C. O. Gas Total Emissions, Ib/ yr NOTE: 67% Valves Open End Flanges/ connecti Pumps 10% Pres. Relief lbldav lblyr ( 5)

122 0.57 17,006 72 0.12 2,113 848 0.57 I18,206 9 6 13,206 8 8.6 2,511 153,042 1) For process streams in benzene service ( e. g., light oil liquid, light oil vapor, etc.) 2) Benzene stream composition is in mass basis. 3) Component count from site. 4) Draft AP 42, Table 12.2 21, lb/ day VOC emission factors for less than quarterly inspections. For flanges, the factor for valves was used. 5) Benzene emissions = AP 42 factor, Ib/ day VOC * benzene mass fraction * no. of components * 365 days/ yr Dib Paul fugitive AP 42 emissions ICF Consulting 1 8LBW  426 PM Tonawanda Coke Corporation Emissions from By product Plant ( Using AP 42 factors with no monitoring data)

Stream( 1) Benzene Type of Mass Equipment Fraction( 2)

Liquid 65% Pump Flange Valve Open End C. O. Gas 4% Exhauster Pres. Relief Valves Total Emissions, Ib/ yr NOTE: No. of AP42 Factor Benzene Components ( 4), VOC, Emissions, ( 3) lbldav lblvr ( 5)

1 2 7 1 2 1 35 6 1,424 0.57 270 0.57 947 0.12 28 2.6 19 8.6 31 0.57 73 2,792 1) For process streams in benzene service ( e. g., light oil liquid, light oil vapor, etc.) 2) Benzene stream composition is in mass basis. 3) Component count from site. 4) Draft AP 42, Table 12.2 21, Ib/ day VOC emission factors for less than quarterly inspections. For flanges, the factor for valves was used. 5) Benzene emissions = AP 42 factor, Ib/ day VOC benzene mass fraction no. of components 365daydyr Dib Paul fugitive AP 42 emissions ICF Consulting 1 8 438PM ... ..

.. ......... . .,.... .. _:. . ~ ., ....... ........... _......... ......... .. ~. .......

............. _... ..... ...... .......... _ L... ..

................ .. ... . . __._ I..__.._..._ ..... . . .............. I.. . ......

............ ,: .

FUGITIVE EQUIPMENT LEAKS .. .. .... .........

... ....

.. T CHEMICAL .<

.: . . :. ;.: . . ~.

..:.. ..

..

.. ,,.: ... ..._.. %. , . _. .... _.. ,~. ......:;..... ............... .... . ....... ...... .... ...

. ., ..

..... ............ ......... . .... ..

... .. , ... ..:., .::. .... , . .... .. .................,....... ..

._

I 8 :,. ' .. . I ... I.

. ........... Summary of Benzene Emissions Fugitive Equipment Leak At By product Chemical Plant ( Based on COETF Factors)

c Benzene Emissions, Benzene Emissions, Company Location lblyr lblhr AK Sted AK Steel I Middletown, OH IAshland. KY I 1471 72I Erie Coke Gulf States Steel IErie, PA Gadsden, AL I 51 5.86E 04 I 53 6.05E 03 New Boston Coke New Boston, OH 95 Tonnwnnda Coke Tonawanda. NY I 10 NOTE: Emission factors are based on COETF field study performed in January 2000.

Ib/ hr = Ib/ yr / 8760 ICF Consulting fugitive COETF emissions Dib Paul 8t31D3 8: BAM AK Steel, MiddletownlOH Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant COETF Factors Type of Equipment No. of COETF Factor Benzene Components for Benzene, Emissions, kg/ hr/ source ( 1) Ib/ yr ( 2)

Pump 2 1.27E 04 Flange 85 2.40E 06 Valves 74 5.84E 06 Connector 3 2.40E 06 Other 61 1.1OE 04 NOTE: ( 1) COETF factors are from field study conducted in January 2000.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kg/ hr/ component 1/ 0.4536 kg/ ib components* 8760 hrs/ yr Dib Paul ICF Consulting 1 4.9053 3.9397 8.3459 0.1390 129.5847 146.9146 no. of fugitii COETF emissions 8/ 3orw  2~ 30PM AK Steel, AshlandIKY Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant ( Using COETF Factors)

NOTE: ( 1) COETF factors are from field study conducted in January 2000.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kgihricomponent 1/ 0.4536 kg/ lb * no. of components * 8760 hdyr Dib Paul fugitive COETF emissions ICF Consulting 1 8131xx) 850 AM Erie Coke Corporation Emissions from By product Plant ( Using COETF Factors)

Stream Type of No. of Emission Factor Benzene Equipment Components ( 1), benzene, Emissions, kn/ hr Iblyr ( 2)

C. O. Gas Exhauster 2 1.02E 05 0.394 C. O. Gas Valves 42 5.84E 06 4.737 Total Emissions, Ib/ yr 5.1 31 NOTE: ( 1) COETF factors are from field study conducted in January 2000.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kg/ hr/ component V0.4536 kg/ lb * no. of components 8760 hdyr Dib Paul fugitiw COETF_ emissions ICF Consulting 1 8131100 852 AM Gulf States Steel Emissions from By product Plant ( Using COETF Factors)

Sbeam Liquid C. O. Gas Total Emissions, Ib/ yr NOTE: Type of No. of Emission Factor Benzene Equipment Components ( l), benzene, Emissions,

Flange Connector Valve Flange Connector Flange ( Leaking) Valve Open Ended Line kglhr Iblvr ( 2)

191 2.40E 06 9 181 2.40E 06 8 83 5.84E 06 9 146 2.40E 06 7 112 2.40E 06 5 9 2.40E 06 0 115 5.84E 06 13 18 2.39E 06 1 53 ( 1) COETF factors are from field study conducted in January 2000.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kg/ hr/ component V0.4536 kg/ lb no. of components 8760 hrslyr Dib Paul fugaie COETF emissions ICF Consulting 1 8/ 3lAX) 8: 5QAM New Boston Coke Corp. Emissions from By product Plant ( Using COETF Factors)

Stream Type of No. of Emission Factor Benzene Equipment Components ( l), benzene, Emissions, kdhr lblvr ( 2)

Liquid Valve 122 5.84E 06 Open End 72 2.39E 06 Flanges/ connecto 848 2.40E 06 Pumps 9 1.27E 04 C. O. Gas Pres. Relief 8. 1.1OE 04 Total Emissions, Ib/ yr NOTE: ( 1) COETF factors are from field study conducted in January 2000.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kg/ hr/ component * 1/ 0.4536 kg/ lb * no. of components 8760 h& yr 14 3 39 22 17 95 Dib Paul ICF Consulting 1 .

Tonawanda Coke Corporation Emissions from By product Plant ( Using COETF Factors)

Stream Type of Equipment Liquid Pump Flange Valve Open End C. O. Gas Exhauster Pres. Relief Valves Total Emissions, Ib/ yr NOTE: No. of Emission Factor Benzene Components ( I), benzene, Emissions, kglhr Ib/ yr ( 2)

1.27E 04 2 2.40E 06 0 5.84E 06 1 2.39E 06 0 2 1.02E 05 0 1 I. 1OE 04 2 35 5.84E46 4 10 ( 1) COETF factors are from field study conducted in January 2000.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kg/ hr/ cornponent V0.4536 kgllb no. of components 8760 hrslyr Dib Paul fugitive COETF emissions ICF Consulting 1 8131Iw  8: sAM .. ... .... _._ . .. ._ _. . . .... ..

..... .....','>" ..... .. 1 ..: ... .... ,.. I. .

.. .. .......... .. ... .. . , y. ..

... :..: .... ,,.. i. ;*. ,..

..... .:........

.. ..... ,.  . . *. . .~... ... I ..

.... BY PRODUCT CHEMICA .. ... ...... .. . . ,. .. , , . .. .. . ,. % ... . . .

.. .. .. . _ .. ... . ...

.. .

Summary of Benzene Emissions Fugitive Equipment Leak At By product Chemical Plant ( Based on IeaWno leak factors)

NOTE: Emission factors are based on screening factors in " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995, Table 2 6. Emissions estimates based on screening range emission factors For Ashland, detailed monitoring report was available by month, quarter, semi annual, and annual. For componentsthat leaked above 500 pprnv, it was assumed leak occurred for the entire monitoring period.

For Gulf States Steel, revised emissions estimates are from the COETF field study report.

For other facilities, emissions estimates were based on one cycle of monitoring only.

ASHLAND IS THE ONLY SITE THAT SHOWED LEAKS ABOVE 10,000 ppmv. EMISSIONS FROM LEAKING COMPONENTS AT ASHLAND WERE ADDED TO THE EMISSIONS FROM NON LEAKING COMPONENTS FOR EACH SITE.

Ib/ hr = Ib/ yr / 8760 ICF Consulting fugitive leak nolea k emissions Dib Paul 1 8BiKiO 1255 PM AK Steel, Middletown/ OH Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant Stream Benzene Mass Type of No. of Emission Benzene Fraction Equipment Components Factor, Emissions, kglhrlsource lblyr ( 2) ( 11 Lean wash oil 0.14% Pump 2 1.20E 02 0.6489 Flange a5 6.00E 05 0.1379 Valves 74 1.70E 03 3.4013 Connector 3 6. OOE 05 0.0049 Other 61 1.50E 03 2.4739 Total Emissions, lb/ yr 6.6668 NOTE: ( 1) Emission factors are based on Table 2 6of " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kg/ hr/ component * V0.4536 kgllb * no. of components * 8760 hdyr benzene wt fraction Dib Paul ICF Consulting 1 I AK Steel, AshlandlKY Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant Total benzene emissions Benzene emissions from non leaking components 3,831 Ib/ yr Benzene emissions from leaking components 1,407 Ib/ yr Total benzene emissions 5,239 Ib/ yr I Dib Paul fugitive leak noleak emissions ICF Consulting 1 8/ 31W 8: 03 PM ..

AK Steel, AshlandlKY Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant Emissions from non leaking Components Stream Benzene Mass Type of No. of Emission Benzene Fraction Equipment Components Factor, Emissions,

Light oil ( liquid or vapor)

Rich wash oil \

Lean wash oil Total Emissions, Ib/ yr NOTE: kglhrlsource lblyr ( 2) ( 11 75% Pump 4 1.20E 02 695 Flange 46 6. OOE 05 40 Valves 93 1.70E 03 2,290 Open End 30 1.50E 03 652 3% Pump 2 1.20E 02 14 Flange 10 6.00E 05 0 Valves 176 1.70E 03 114 Open End 21 1: 50E 03 18 0.14% Pump 3 1.20E 02 1 Flange 10 6.00E 05 0 Valves 131 1.7OE 03 6 Open End 19 1.50E 03 1 3,831 ( 1) Emission factors are based on Table 2 6 of " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kg/ hr/ component * V0.4536 kgllb * no. of components 8760 hdyr benzene wt fraction Dib Paul fugitive leak noleak emissions ICF Consulting 1 8131100 11: 30AM AK Steel, AshlandlKY Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant Emissions from leaking components Component Type/ Screening Emission Factor, Monitoring Level, pprnv ( 1) kglhrlsource ( 2) Frequency Valve ( difficult to reach annual) 10000 8.52E 02 Other 10000 1.20E 02 ( semi annual) 10000 1.20E 02 Total benzene emissions, Ib/ yr)

NOTE: Benzene Emissions, Ib/ yr ( 3)

1234.05 86.54 86.54 1407.13 ( 1) It was assumed that a component was leaking if monitoring indicated 500 ppmv or greater, All leaking components were assumed to be in light oil service.

( 2) From   Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates , EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995.

( 3) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kglhrlcomponent * V0.4536kg/ lb * benzene mass fraction month or quarter or semi annual or annual in hrs Dib Paul fugliw leak noleak ernissions ICF Consulting 1 8131xx) 1153AM Erie Coke'Corporation Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant Stream Benzene Mass Type of No. of Emission Benzene Fraction Equipment Components Factor, Emissions, kglhrlsource lblyr ( 2) ( 11 CO Gas 1% Valves 42 6.00E 04 4.87 Other 2 1.50E 03 0.58 Total Emissions, Ib/ yr 5.45 NOTE:

( 1) Emissionfactors are based on Table 2 6 of " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kglhrlcomponent 1/ 0.4536 kg/ lb no. of components * 8760 hrs/ yr * benzene wt fraction Dib Paul fugitive leak noleak emissions ICF Consulting 1 8/ 31rW  1156 AM Gulf States Steel Emissions from By product Plant ( Using AP 42 factors with no monitoring data)

Stream Benzene Mass Type of No. of Emission Benzene Fraction Equipment Components Factor, Emissions,

Liquid 60% Flange 62% Connector 67% Valve C. O. Gas 89% Flange 31% Connector 100% Flange ( Leaking 100% Valve 100% Open Ended Lir Total Emissions, Ib/ yr NOTE: kglhrlsource lblyr ( 2) ( 1) 191 0.00006 133 181 6.00E 05 130 83 1.70E 03 1,826 146 0.00006 151 112 6.00E 05 40 9 6.00E 05 10 115 0.0006 1,333 , 18 0.0015 521 4,144 ( 1) Emission factors are based on Table 2 6 of " Protocolfor Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995.

~

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kg/ hr/ component U0.4536 kg/ lb * no. of components 8760 hrs/ yr benzene wt fraction ~

Dib Paul fugitwe leak noleak_ ernissions 8t311W 12: 15 PM I I New BostonlOH '

Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant Stream Benzene Mass Fradion Light oil ( liquid or vapor) 67%

CO Gas 10%

Total Emissions, Ib/ yr NOTE: Type of No. of Emission Benzene Equipment Components Factor, Emissions, kglhrlsource lblyr ( 2) ( 11 Pump 9 1.20E 02 1,397 Flange a48 6.00E 05 658 Valves 122 1.70E 03 2,684 Open End 72 1SOE 03 1,397 Other a 1 SOE 03 23 6,160 ( 1) Emission factors are based on Table 2 6 of " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kg/ hr/ component * 1/ 0.4536 kg/ lb * no. of components 8760 hdyr benzene wt fraction Dib Paul fugitii lea k noleak emissions ICF Consulting 1 8131100 12: 17 PM .

TonawandalNY Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant ( Based on leaklno leak factors)

Stream Benzene Mass Type of No. of Emission Benzene Fraction Equipment Components Factor, Emissions, kglhrlsource lblyr ( 2) ( 11 Light oil ( liquid or vapor) 65% Pump Flange 1 2 1.20E 02 6.00E 05 151 2 Valves 7 1.70E 03 149 Open End 1 1.50E 03 19 ,

CO Gas 1% Other 3 .1.50E 03 1 Valves 35 6.00E 04 4 Total Emissions, Ib/ yr 325 NOTE:

( 1) Emission factors are based on Table 2 6 of   Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates , EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kg/ hr/ component 1/ 0.4536kg/ lb no. of components   8760 hrs/ yr benzene wt fraction Dib Paul fugitive leak noleak emissions ICF Consulting 1 8Blm 12118 PM ...

.. :

..

.... ...... . . . . . .... .

, :.:. . . .: , .>... .

... .. .. . ., ..: ... >.. , .

.. .... . ,.

............ . j ..........,.,. ................

..,~ ... . ... .:. . ......

ONS BASED 0 ... ....

.... .

FUGITIVE EQUIPMENT LE _. .... " .

.. BY PRODUCT CHEMICA e Summary of Benzene Emissions Fugitive Equipment Leak At By product Chemical Plant ( Based on default zero, pegged emission, and correlation equation)

Benzene Emissions, Benzene Emissions, Company Location lblyr lblhr AK Steel Middletown, OH 0.05 5.25E 06 AK Steel Ashland, KY 2007.40 2.29E 01 Erie Coke Erie, PA 0.06 7.40E 06 Gulf States Steel Gadsden, AL 48.00 5.48E 03 New Boston Coke New Boston, OH 20.43 2.33E 03 Tonawanda Coke Tonawanda. NY I 1.07 1 23E 04 NOTE: Emissions estimates based on default zero emission rate factors for non leakingcomponents, correlation equation for components leaking at 4 0,000 ppm, and pegged emission rates for components leaking at or > 10,000 ppmv.

Emission factors are based on screening factors in " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995, Table C 3.

For Ashland, detailed monitoring report was available by month, quarter, semi annual, . andannual. For components that leaked above 500 ppmv, it was assumed leak occurred for the entire monitoring period.

For Gulf States Steel, revised emissions estimates are from the COETF field study report.

For other facilities, emissions estimates were based on one cycle of monitoringonly.

Ib/ hr = lblyr / 8760 ICF Consulting fugitive emissions Dib Paul 1 8/ 3lrW 11: lSAM  AK Steel, Middletown/ OH Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant Total benzene emissions Benzene emissions from non leaking components =

Benzene emissions from leaking components Total benzene emissions

Dib Paul ICF Consulting 1 0.0248 lb/ yr 0.0212 Ib/ yr 0.0460 Ib/ yr f ugitiie emissions 8 2: 04PM AK Steel, MiddIetownlOH Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant Emissions from non leaking components Stream( 1) Benzene Mass Type of No. of Zero Default Zero .. Fraction ( 2) Equipment Reading Emission Component Rate, s( 3) kglhrlsource 14) Benzene Emissions, I blyr ( 5)

Lean wash oil 0.14% Pump 2 2.40E 05 0.0013 Flange 85 3.1 OE 07 0.0007 Valves 74 7.80E 06 0.01 56 Connector 3 7.50E 06 0.0006 Other 61 4.00E 06 0.0066 Total Emissions, Ib/ yr 0.0248 NOTE: ( 1) and ( 2) All components were assumed to be in lean wash oil service. ( 3) Component wunt, and no. of zero leaking components from site. Itwas assumed that a component with less than 500 ppmv screeningvalue was not leaking. ( 4) Defautt zero emission factors for TOC are from " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995, Table C 3. ( 5) Benzene emissions = Defautt zero factor,. kg/ hr/ component 1/ 0.4536 kg/ lb * no. of components 8760 hrs/ yr wt fraction benzene Dib Paul fugitive emissions ICF Consulting 1 813oxx) 2101 PM AK Steel, MiddletownlOH Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant Emissions from leaking components Component Type/ Screening Correlation Benzene Monitoring Level, Equation, Emissions Frequency ppmv ( 1) kglhr/ source ( 2) , lblyr 13)

Other ( Quarterly) 1000 1.36E 05*( SV) 0.589 0.0053 Total for 4 components 0.0212 NOTE: ( 1) It was assumed that a component was leaking if monitoring indicated 500 ppmv or greater. All leaking components were assumed to be in light oil service.

( 2) From   Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estirnatesn, EPA 453/ R 95 0l7, November 1995.

( 3) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kglhrlcomponent * V0.4536 kgllb * benzene mass fraction month or quarter or semi annual or annual in hrs Dib Paul fugitii emissions ICF Consulting 1 0BID3 lI: 44AM 1. L AK Steel, AshlandIKY Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant Total benzene emissions Benzene emissions from non leaking components Genzene emissions from leaking components .

Total benzene emissions Dib Paul OCF Consulting 1 14 Ib/ yr 1,994 Ib/ yr 2,007 Ib/ yr fugitive emissions 81181M) 1203 PM AK Steel, AshlandlKY Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant .

Emissions from non leaking components Stream( 1) Benzene Mass Type of No. of Zero Default Zero Benzene Fraction ( 2) Equipment Reading Emission Emissions, Components Rate, Iblyr ( 5) ( 3) kglhrkource 14) Light oil ( liquid or vapor) 75Oh Pump 4 2.40E 05 1.39 Flange 46 3.10E 07 0.21 Valves 93 7.80E 06 10.51 Open End 30 2.00E 06 0.87 Rich wash oil 3% Pump 2 2.4OE 05 0.03 Flange 10 3.1 OE 07 0.00 Valves 116 7.80E 06 0.52 Open End 21 2.00E 06 0.02 Lean wash oil 0.14% Pump 3 2.4OE 05 0.00 Flange 10 3.1 OE 07 0.00 VaJves 131 7.80E 06 0.03 Open End 19 2. OOE 06 0.00 Total Emissions, Ib/ yr 14 NOTE: ( 1) For process streams in benzene service ( e. g., light oil liquid, light oil vapor, etc.) ( 2) Compositions from site. ( 3) Component count, and no. of zero leaking components from site. It was assumed that a component with Jessthan 500ppmv screening value was not leaking. ( 4) Default zero emission factors for TOC are from " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995, Table C 3. ( 5) Benzene emissions = Default zero factor, kglhrlcornponent * 110.4536 kg/ lb no. of components 8760 hdyr * wt fraction benzene Dib Paul fugitive missions ICF Consulting 1 811 la 2122 PM c AK Steel, AshlandlKY Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant Emissions from leaking components Component Type/ Monitoring Frequency Valve ( Quarterly)

Flange ( Quarterly)

Other ( Quarterly)

Valve ( difficult to reach annuaI)

Other ( semi annual)

NOTE: Screening Correlation Equation, Level, ppmv ( 1) kglhrlsource ( 2)

5000 2.29E 06*( SV) 0.746 500 2.29E 06*( Sw0' 746 700 4.61E 06 *( SV) 0.703 700 1.36E 05*( SV) 0.589 10000 6.40E 02 10000 7.30E 02 10000 7.30E 02 Benzene Emissions, lblyr ( 3)

4.70 0.84 1.65 . 2.30 926.98 528.67 528.67 1,994 ( 1) It was assumed that a component was leaking if monitoring indicated 500 ppmv or greater. All leaking components were assumed to be in light oil service.

( 2) From " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995.

( 3) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kg/ hr/ component * 1/ 0.4536kg/ lb benzene mass fraction month or quarter or semi annual or annual in hrs Dib Paul fugitiie emissions ICF Consulting 1 8/ 31roO 11: 45 AM Erie Coke Corporation Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By Product Plant Stream( 1) Benzene Mass Type of No. of Zero Default Zero Benzene Fraction ( 2) Equipment Reading Emission Emissions, Components Rate, Iblyr ( 5) ( 3) kglhrlsource CO Gas 1% Valves ( 4) 42 7.80E 06 0.06 Other 2 4.00E 06 0.00 Total Emissions, Ib/ yr 0.06 NOTE: ( 1) For process streams in benzene service ( e. g., light oil liquid, light oil vapor, etc.) ( 2) Compositionsfrom site. ( 3) Component count, and no. of zero leaking components from site. It was assumed that a component with less than 500 ppmv screening value was not leaking. ( 4) Default zero emission factors for TOC are from " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 4WR 95 017, November 1995, Table C 3. ( 5) Benzene emissions = Default zero factor, kg/ hr/ cornponent 110.4536kg/ lb no. of components * 8760 hrs/ yr * wt fraction benzene Dib Paul ICF Consulting 1 fugitive emissions 8111100  218 PM New BostonlOH Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By P. roduct Plant .

Sbearn( 1) Benzene Mass Type of No. of Zero Default Zero Benzene Fraction ( 2) Equipment Reading Emission Emissions, Components Rate, Wyr ( 5) ( 3) kg/ hr/ source 141 Light oil ( liquid or vapor) 67% Pump 9 2.40E 05 2.79 Flange 848 3.10E 07 3.40 Valves 122 7.80E 06 12.31 Open End 72 2.00E 06 1.86 CO Gas 10% Other 8 4.00E 06 0.06 Total Emissions, Ib/ yr 20 NOTE: ( 1) For process streams in benzene service ( e. g., light oil liquid, light oil vapor, etc.) ( 2) Compositions from site. ( 3) Component count, and no. of zero leaking components from site. It was assumed that a component with less than 500 ppmv screening value was not leaking. ( 4) Default zero emission facton for TOC are from " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995, Table C 3. ( 5) Benzene emissions = Default zero factor, kg/ hr/ component 1/ 0.4536kg/ lb * no. of components * 8760 hrs/ yr * wl fraction benzene Cllb Paul ICF Consuning 1 fugitive emissions 8/ 11100 2: 17PM TonawandalNY Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By Product Plant Strearn( 1) Benzene Mass Type of No. of Zero Default Zero Benzene Fraction ( 2) Equipment Reading Emission Emissions, Components Rate, I blyr ( 5) ( 3) kg/ hrlsource 141 Light oil ( liquid or vapor) 65% Pump 1 2.40E 05 0.30 Flange 2 3.1OE 07 0.01 Valves 7 7.80E 06 0.69 Open End 1 2.00E 06 0.03 CO Gas 1% Other 3 4.00E 06 0.00 Valves ' 35 7.80E 06 0.05 Total Emissions, Ib/ yr NOTE: ( 1) For process streams in benzene service ( e. g., light oil liquid, light oil vapor, efc.) ( 2) Compositions from site. . .

( 3) Component count, and no. of zero leaking components from site. It was assumed that a component with less than 500 ppmv screening value was not leaking. ( 4) Default zero emission factors for TOC are from " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates", EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995, Table C 3. ( 5) Benzene emissions = Default zero factor, kg/ hr/ component * 1/ 0.4536kg/ lb no. of components 8760 hrslyr wt fraction, benzene 1 Dib Paul fugitive emissions ICF Consutting 1 8/ 11100 1SPM I

.... ... _.

........ . . . . . ................. .. .. .... 2 ...... . .,

..

BY PRODUCT CHEMICAL PLANT ..

... . I ..

.. Summary of Benzene Emissions Fugitive. Equipment Leak At By product Chemical Plant ( Based on 250 ppmv leak)

Benzene Emissions, Benzene Emissions, Company AK Steel AK Steel Erie Coke Gulf States Steel New Boston Coke Tonawanda Coke NOTE: Location lblyr lblhr 1 Middletown, OH 1 Ashland, KY 484 Erie, PA 1 Gadsden, AL 1,847 New Boston, OH 2,951 Tonawanda. NY 39 All components are assumed to leak at half the leak level ( 500ppmv/ 2)

Emission Estimates are based on " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates," EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995, Table. C 3. Emissions estimates are based on correlation equation.

lblhr = Ib/ yr / 8760 ICF Consulting Dib Paul 1 1.67E 04 5.53E 02 ' 1.46E 04 2.11E 01 3.37E 01 4.43E 03 fugitive_ 250ppmv_ emissions 8t31xx)  8: 42 AM ?

AK Steel, Middletown/ Ol Fugitive Equipment . Leak Emissions from By product Plant Stream Benzene Mass Type of No. of Correlation Fraction Equipment Components Equation, kglhrlsource ( 1)

Lean wash oil 0.14% Pump 2 5.03E 05 *( SV) o. 6' o Flange 85 4.61E 06 r( SV) 0.7w Valves 74 2.29E 06 *( SV) 0.74e Connector 3 1.53E 06 *( SV) 0.735 Benzene Emissions, Iblyr ( 2)

0.0789 0.5138 0.281 8 Other 61 1.36E 054( SV) 0.5Bg Total Emissions, Ib/ yr NOTE: ( 1) Emission Estimates are based on " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates," EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995, Table C 3.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kg/ hr/ component * V0.4536 kghb * no. off components * 8760 hdyr benzene wt fraction 0.0072 0.5797 1.4614 Dib Paul fuglie 250ppmv ernissions ICF Consulting 1 8Blm  820 AM AK Steel, Ashland/ KY Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant Stream Benzene Mass Type of No. of Correlation Equation, Benzene Fraction Equipment Components Light oil ( liquid or vapor)

Rich wash oil Lean wash oil Total Emissions, Ib/ yr NOTE: 75% Pump 4 Flange 46 Valves 93 Open End 30 3% Pump 2 Flange 10 Valves 116 Open End 21 0.14% Pump 3 Flange 10 Valves 131 Open End 19 kglhrlsource ( 1) Emissions, lblyr ( 2)

5.03E 05 *( SV) o. 610 84.58 4.61E 06*( SV) 0.703 148.97 2.29E 06 *( SV) 0.746 189.70 2.20E 06 *( SV) 0.704 46.62 5.03E 05 *( SV) o. 6' o 1,69 4.61E 06 *( SV) o. m 1.30 2.29E 06 *( SV) O.'" 9.46 2.20E 06' *( SV) 0.' 04 1.31 .

5.03E 05 *( SV) o. elo 0.12 4.61E 06 *( SV) o. m 0.06 2.29E 06 *( SV) O. 7* 0.50 2.20E 06 *( SV) 0.7w 0.06 . 484.36 ( 1) Emission Estimates are based on " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates," EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995, Table C 3.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kg/ hr/ cornponent 110.4536 kg/ lb no. of components 8760 hrs/ yr benzene wt fraction Dib Paul fugitii_ 250ppmv emissions ICF Consulting 1 8~ 1x30  a:= AM Erie Coke Corporation Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By Product Plant Stream Benzene Type of No. of Correlation Equation, Benzene Mass Equipment Components kglhrlsource ( 1) Emissions, Fraction Iblyr ( 2)

CO Gas 1% Valves 42 2.29E 06 *( SV) 0.748 1.14 Other 2 1.36E 05 *( SV)'.= 0.1 358 Total Emissions, Ib/ yr NOTE:

( 1) Emission Estimates are based on " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates," EPA 453R 95 017, November 1995, Table C 3.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kg/ hr/ component * V0.4536 kg/ lb * no. of components * 8760 hrslyr * benzene wt fraction Dib Paul ICF Consulting 1 1.28 i fugitive 250ppmv emissions 8B11M3 & 24 AM Gulf States Steel Emissions from By Product PlaG Stream Benzene Mass Type of No. of Fraction Equipment Components Correlatlon Equation, Benzene Emissions, kglhrlsource ( 1) lblyr ( 2) Liquid m Flange 62% Connector 67% Valve C. O. Gas 89% Flange 31% Connector 100% Flange ( leaking 100% Valve 100% Open Ended Lin Total Emissions, IWyr 191 181 83 146 112 9 115 18 4.61E 06 *( SV) 0.70J 1.53E 06 *( SV) 0.735 2.29E 06 *( SV) 0.74 4.61 E 06 *( SV) 0.70J 1.53E 06 *( SV) 0.735 4.61E 06 *( SV) 0~ 703 2.29E 06 *( SV) 0.74 2.20E 06 *( SV)'." 495 192 151 561 59 39 313 37 1,047 ( 1) Emission Estimates are based on " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates," EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995, Table C 3.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kghrkomponent 110.4536 kgAb no. of components 8760 hrs/ yr benzene wt fraction Dib Paul ICF Consulting 1 New BostoWOH Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from ByProduct Plant Stream Benzene Mass Type of No. of Correlation Equation, Fraction Equipment Components kglhrlsource ( 1)

Light oil ( liquid or vapor) 67% Pump 9 5.03E 05 *( SV) o"' o Flange 848 4.61E 06 *( SV) 0.' 03 Valves 122 2.29E 06 '( SV) 0.7* 6 Open End 72 2.2OE 06 *( SV) 0.704 CO Gas 10% Other 8 1.36E 05 *( SV) O. ss Total Emissions, Ib/ yr NOTE:

( 1) Emission Estimates are based on " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates," EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995, Table C 3.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kghdcomponent 110.4536 kgnb no. of components 8760 hrrlyr benzene wt fraction Dib Paul ICF Consulting 1 Benzene Emissions, lblyr ( 2)

170 2,453 222 100 5 2.951 TonawandalNY Fugitive Equipment Leak Emissions from By product Plant ( Basedon 250 ppmv leak)

Stream Benzene Mass Type of Fraction Equipment Light oil ( liquid or vapor) 65% Pump Flange Valves Open End CO Gas 1% Other Valves Total Emissions, Iblyr NOTE: No. of Correlation Equation, Components kglhrlsource ( 1)

1 5.03E 05 *( SV) o. 6' o 2 4.61E 06 *( SV) 0.7m 7 2.29E 06 *( SV) 0.'* 6 1 2.20E 06 *( SV) 0.7M 3 1.36E 05 *( SV) o. m 35 2.29E 06 *( SV) 0.7a Benzene Emissions, lblyr ( 2)

18.33 5.61 12.37 1.35 0.2036 0.95 38.82 ( 1) Emission Estimates are based on " Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission I Estimates," EPA 453/ R 95 017, November 1995, Table C 3.

( 2) Benzene emissions = emission factor, kglhrlcomponent V0.4536 kgllb * no. of I components* 8760 hrs/ yr benzene wt fraction Dib Paul fugYive_ 2K) pprnv ernisisiom ICF Consulting 1 ~ I~ IIQQ  ai33 AM