[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 8, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26712-26714]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10909]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0399; Directorate Identifier 2011-SW-064-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Model EC 155B, EC155B1, SA-365N, SA-
365N1, AS-365N2, AS 365 N3, and SA-366G1 helicopters. This proposed AD
would require inspecting the collective pitch lever for correct locking
and unlocking conditions. This proposed AD is prompted by two separate
reports of inadvertent collective pitch lever locking and unlocking.
The proposed actions are intended to detect an incorrectly adjusted
collective pitch lever, which could result in loss of control of the
helicopter.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 8, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket Operations Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the economic
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX
75052; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>;
or at http://www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may review the referenced
service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas
76137.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Wilbanks, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Rotorcraft Certification Office, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
written comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to
the economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that might
result from adopting the proposals in this document. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters
should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed
electronically, commenters should submit only one time.
    We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as
a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this proposal, we
will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed after the comment period has
closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay.
We may change this proposal in light of the comments we receive.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD
No. 2011-0154, dated August 22, 2011, to correct an unsafe condition
for Eurocopter Model EC 155B, EC155B1, SA-365N, SA-365N1, AS-365N2, AS
365 N3, and SA-366G1 helicopters. EASA advises that two occurrences
have been reported of inadvertent locking and unlocking of the
collective pitch lever. One inadvertent collective pitch lever locking
occurred when moving the collective pitch lever to the low-pitch
position, and one inadvertent collective pitch lever unlocking occurred
during engine start. To address this unsafe condition, Eurocopter
issued AS 365 Alert Telex No. 67.00.10, SA 366 Alert Telex No. 67.05,
and EC 155 Alert Telex No. 67A007, which describe procedures to inspect
the collective pitch lever for correct locking and unlocking
conditions. This inspection was mandated by Direction
G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC) France AD No. F-
2005-127, dated July 20, 2005. DGAC subsequently revised its AD, No. F-
2005-127 R1, dated February 1, 2006 (DGAC AD F-2005-127 R1), after
Eurocopter issued Alert Service Bulletins containing the same
inspection procedures and bearing the same numbers as the Alert
Telexes. Since the issuance of DGAC AD F-2005-127 R1 Eurocopter
developed an assembly comprised of a blade, a hinge, and a return
spring to replace the flexible collective lever locking blade as
terminating action for the inspection required by the AD. EASA then
issued AD No. 2011-0154, dated August 22, 2011 (EASA AD 2011-0154),
which superseded DGAC AD F-2005-127 R1, retaining the inspection
procedures for the collective pitch lever and removing from the
applicability helicopters with the hinged, spring-loaded collective
lever locking blade installed, designated as modification (MOD)
0767B65.

FAA's Determination

    These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of
France and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
our bilateral agreement with France, EASA, its technical
representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in
its AD. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all known
relevant information and determined that an unsafe condition is likely
to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

Related Service Information

    We reviewed Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. 67.00.10
for Model AS365 helicopters, ASB No. 67.05 for Model SA366 helicopters,
and ASB No. 67A007 for Model EC155 helicopters. All three ASBs are
Revision 1 and are dated February 25, 2009. These ASBs describe
procedures for inspecting and adjusting the collective pitch lever for
correct locking and unlocking conditions.
    Eurocopter has also issued ASB No. 67.00.12, Revision 0, dated
February 25, 2009, for Model AS365 helicopters; ASB No. 67.07, Revision
0, dated February 25, 2009, for Model AS366 helicopters; and ASB No.
67-009, Revision 1, dated July 19, 2010, for Model EC 155 helicopters.
These ASBs contain the procedures for MOD 0767B65.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require:
     Inspecting the collective pitch lever for correct
unlocking with a spring scale.
     If the collective pitch lever unlocks outside of the
correct ``G'' load, adjusting the collective pitch lever restraining
tab and, for certain models, adjusting the collective link rods.
     Inspecting the collective pitch lever for the risk of
inadvertent locking by measuring the clearance between the locking pin
of the collective pitch lever and the L-section of the restraining tab.
     If the clearance between the locking pin of the collective
pitch lever and the L-section of the restraining tab is incorrect,
modifying the tab with a slight bend to the tab.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 32 helicopters of
U.S. Registry.
    We estimate that operators may incur the following costs in order
to comply with this AD. Inspecting and adjusting the collective pitch
lever would require about 1 work hour at an average labor rate of $85
per hour, for a total cost per helicopter of $85 and a cost to U.S.
operators of $2,720.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications

under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed, I certify this proposed regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
Reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Eurocopter France: Docket No. FAA-2013-0399; Directorate Identifier
2011-SW-064-AD.

(a) Applicability

    This AD applies to Model EC 155B, EC155B1, SA-365N, SA-365N1,
AS-365N2, AS 365 N3, and SA-366G1 helicopters, except helicopters
with modification (MOD) 0767B5 installed, certificated in any
category.

(b) Unsafe Condition

    This AD defines the unsafe condition as inadvertent locking and
unlocking of the collective pitch lever, which could result in
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

(c) Reserved

(d) Compliance

    You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.

(e) Required Actions

    Within 50 hours time-in-service:
    (1) For Model EC155B and EC155B1 helicopters:
    (i) Lock the collective pitch lever, and using a spring scale,
measure the load (G) required to unlock the pilot's collective pitch
lever as depicted in Figure 1, Detail B of Eurocopter Alert Service
Bulletin (ASB) No. 67A007, Revision 1, dated February 25, 2009 (ASB
67A007).
    (ii) If the collective pitch lever unlocks at a load less than
11 deca Newtons (daN) (24.7 lbs) or greater than 14 daN (31.5 lbs),
before further flight, adjust the collective pitch lever restraining
tab (F) using the oblong holes.
    (iii) Set the collective pitch lever to the ``low pitch''
position and hold it in this position, without forcing it downwards.
    (iv) Measure the clearance (J1) between the locking pin of the
collective pitch lever (C) and the L-section of the restraining tab
(F) as depicted in Figure 1, Detail A of ASB 67A007.
    (v) If the clearance between the locking pin of the collective
pitch lever and the L-section of the restraining tab is less than 3
millimeters (mm), before further flight, remove the restraining tab,
clamp the restraining tab (F) in a vice with soft jaws, and
gradually apply a load (H) to ensure a clearance of 3 mm or more, as
depicted in Figure 1, Detail K of ASB 67A007.
    (2) For Model SA-365N, SA-365N1, AS-365N2, and AS 365 N3
helicopters:
    (i) Completely loosen the friction, lock the collective pitch
lever, and using a spring scale, measure the load (G) required to
unlock the pilot's collective pitch lever as depicted in Figure 1,
Detail B of Eurocopter ASB No. 67.00.10, Revision 1, dated February
25, 2009 (ASB 67.00.10).
    (ii) If the collective pitch lever unlocks at a load less than 5
daN (11.3 lbs) or greater than 14 daN (31.5 lbs), before further
flight, adjust the collective pitch lever restraining tab (F) using
the oblong holes and adjust the collective link rods as described in
the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 2.B.4., of ASB 67.00.10.
    (iii) Set the collective pitch lever to the ``low pitch''
position and hold it in this position, without forcing it downwards.
    (iv) Tighten the friction lock and measure the clearance (J1)
between the locking pin of the collective pitch lever (C) and the L-
section of the restraining tab (F) as depicted in Figure 1, Detail A
of ASB 67.00.10.
    (v) If the clearance between the locking pin of the collective
pitch lever and the L-section of the restraining tab is less than 3
mm, before further flight, remove the restraining tab, clamp the
restraining tab (F) in a vice with soft jaws, and gradually apply a
load (H) to ensure a clearance of 3 mm or more, as depicted in
Figure 1, Detail K, of ASB 67.00.10.
    (3) For Model SA-366G1 helicopters:
    (i) Completely loosen the friction, lock the collective pitch
lever, and using a spring scale, measure the load (G) required to
unlock the pilot's collective pitch lever as depicted in Figure 1,
Detail B of Eurocopter ASB No. 67.05, Revision 1, dated February 25,
2009 (ASB 67.05).
    (ii) If the collective pitch lever unlocks at a load less than 5
daN (11.3 lbs) or greater than 14 daN (31.5 lbs), before further
flight, adjust the collective pitch lever restraining tab (F) using
the oblong holes and adjust the collective link rods as described in
the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 2.B.4., of ASB 67.05.
    (iii) Set the collective pitch lever to the ``low pitch''
position and hold it in this position, without forcing it downwards.
    (iv) Tighten the friction lock and measure the clearance (J1)
between the locking pin of the collective pitch lever (C) and the L-
section of the restraining tab (F) as depicted in Figure 1, Detail
A, of ASB 67.05.
    (v) If the clearance between the locking pin of the collective
pitch lever and the L-section of the restraining tab is less than 3
mm, before further flight, remove the restraining tab, clamp the
restraining tab (F) in a vice with soft jaws, and gradually apply a
load (H) to ensure a clearance of 3 mm or more, as depicted in
Figure 1, Detail K, of ASB 67.05.

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: Matt Wilbanks, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Rotorcraft Certification Office, Rotorcraft Directorate,
FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817)
222-5110; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.

(g) Additional Information

    (1) The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation
Safety Agency AD No. 2011-0154, dated August 22, 2011.

(h) Subject

    Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6710: Main Rotor
Control.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 26, 2013.
Kim Smith,
Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-10909 Filed 5-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 190 (Wednesday, October 1, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59179-59182]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23371]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[EPA-HQ-SFUND-2014-0620; FRL-9914-86-OSWER]
RIN 2050-AG76

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP); Amending the NCP for Public Notices for Specific Superfund
Activities

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
amend the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan (NCP) to add language to broaden the methods by which the EPA can
notify the public about certain Superfund activities. Currently, the
NCP requires that the public be notified of certain Superfund
activities by publishing a notice in a major local newspaper of general
circulation. By broadening the notification methods, the lead agency
will be able to adopt a notification approach that is most effective at
informing a community. The lead agency should assess the ways a
community receives information and consider the notification approach
which best suits a specific site and community.

DATES: Written comments must be received by October 31, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-2014-0620, by one of the following methods:
     www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
     Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Mail: Send two copies of your comments to: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Superfund
Docket, Mailcode: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0002.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver two copies of your comments to: EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC), WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave. NW., Washington, DC. Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-2014-
0620. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal
hours of operation from 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-
2014-0620. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going

through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an
electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or
CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket, visit
the EPA Docket Center homepage at www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Superfund Docket (Docket
ID No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-2014-0620). This Docket Facility is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the Superfund Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. The EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) is located at WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    General information: Superfund, TRI, EPCRA, RMP and Oil Information
Center at<PHONE_NUMBER> or TDD<PHONE_NUMBER> (hearing impaired). In
the Washington, DC metropolitan area, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or TDD (703)
412-3323.
    Technical information: Jean Farrell at<PHONE_NUMBER>
(farrell.jean@epa.gov), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460-0002, Mail Code 5204P.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Why is EPA issuing this proposed rule?

    This document proposes to amend the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) to expand the methods by
which the EPA can notify the public about certain Superfund activities.
The NCP requires the lead Agency to publish a notice ``in a major local
newspaper of general circulation'' when certain Superfund site-related
activities occur. Many of these requirements were established in 1990
or earlier versions of the NCP, when it was common practice for
government agencies to publish notices of planned actions in
newspapers. Today, multiple ways are used to notify the public about
Superfund site-related activities that may be as or more effective than
publishing notices in newspapers. For example, the public may be
notified of certain actions the lead agency takes by distributing
flyers door-to-door, mailing notices to homes, sending email
notifications, making telephone calls or posting on Web sites. In
certain cases, publishing a notice in a major newspaper of general
circulation may not be the most effective way of notifying a community
about a specific Superfund action, and may be less cost effective than
other notification methods.
    EPA is proposing to change the public notice language in the NCP.
Instead of giving adequate notice to a community via a major local
newspaper of general circulation, EPA is proposing that such notice be
given via a major local newspaper of general circulation or by using
one or more other mechanisms. As the Superfund community involvement
program has gained experience working with communities around Superfund
sites, EPA often has used additional communication approaches beyond
publishing notices in major local newspapers of general circulation to
ensure communities have an opportunity to be fully informed and
involved in the Superfund process. Making this modification to the NCP
will allow the lead agency to select an effective way or ways to inform
the public.
    One way the lead agency may learn about community preferences on
communications approaches is when conducting community interviews as
part of the development of the Community Involvement Plan (CIP) (also
known as a Community Relations Plan) at a site. A CIP is a site-
specific strategy to enable meaningful community involvement throughout
the Superfund cleanup process. Consistent with the NCP
[300.415(n)(3)(i); 300.415(n)(4)(i); and 300.430(c)(2)(i)], the lead
agency conducts in those instances interviews with local officials,
community residents, public interest groups, or other interested or
affected parties, as appropriate, to solicit their concerns and
information needs, and to learn how and when citizens would like to be
involved in the Superfund process.
    Conducting community interviews is a particularly effective way to
gather information about how a community receives information. The
information and insights gained from community interviews will help the
lead agency make a decision on which notification approach suits a
specific site and best encourages the community's participation. When
community interviews are not conducted, the lead agency can determine
community preferences on communication approaches by conducting
activities such as consulting local leaders or media outlets to learn
how a community typically receives information.
    In addition to the above, Superfund has a long history of providing
meaningful community involvement opportunities at critical junctures in
the cleanup process, such as selection of remedial actions, five-year
reviews of sites where waste is left in place, and deletions of sites
from the National Priorities List (NPL). In addition to ensuring the
basic requirements for community involvement are met, the lead agency
may enlist additional community notification processes over and above
the basic requirements to enhance the community's involvement, and
tailor the communication approaches to meet the needs of the community.

II. What does this amendment do?

    This document proposes to revise the NCP to expand the methods by
which the EPA can notify the public about certain Superfund activities.
This rule will revise six sections of the NCP to change the public
notice language in the NCP to allow adequate notice to a community via
a major local newspaper of general circulation or by using one or more
other mechanisms. The intent of these sections is to ensure the lead
agency informs the public of Superfund activities at defined stages
within the Superfund process. Specifically, this amendment will add
language to:

    Sec.  300.415(n)(2)(i) that requires a notice of the
availability of the administrative record file for CERCLA actions
where, based on a site evaluation, the lead agency determines that a
removal is appropriate, and that less than six months exists before
on-site removal action must begin.
    Sec.  300.415(n)(4)(ii) that requires notification of the
engineering evaluation/cost analysis (EE/CA) where the lead agency
determines that a CERCLA removal action is appropriate and that a
planning period of at least six months exists prior to initiation of
the on-site removal activities.
    Sec.  300.425(e)(4)(ii) that requires notification of releases
that may be deleted from the National Priorities List (NPL).

    Sec.  300.815(a) that requires notification of the availability
of the administrative record file for the selection of a remedial
action at the commencement of the remedial investigation.
    Sec.  300.820(a)(1) that requires notification of the
availability of the administrative record file when an EE/CA is made
available for public comment, if the lead agency determines that a
removal action is appropriate and that a planning period of at least
six months exists before on-site removal activities must be
initiated.
    Sec.  300.820(b)(l) that requires notification of the
availability of the administrative record file for all other removal
actions not included in Sec.  300.820(a).

    This document does not propose changes to the publication
requirements of Sec.  117 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Section 117(d) of CERCLA
states ``[f]or the purposes of this section, publication shall include,
at a minimum, publication in a major local newspaper of general
circulation.'' Activities included under section 117 of CERCLA include
section 117(a) notification of the proposed plan, section 117(b)
notification of the final remedial action plan adopted, and section
117(c) notification of an explanation of differences after adoption of
a final remedial action plan. Publication in a major local newspaper of
general circulation will continue to be required for 1) notice of
availability of the proposed plan (40 CFR 300.430(f)(3)(i)(A)), 2)
notice of availability of the Record of Decision (40 CFR
300.430(f)(6)(i)), 3) notice that briefly summarizes the explanation of
significant differences (40 CFR 300.435(c)(2)(i)(B)), 4) notice of
availability and a brief description of the proposed amendment to the
Record of Decision (40 CFR 300.435(c)(2)(ii)(A)), and 5) notice of
availability of the amended Record of Decision (40 CFR
300.435(c)(2)(ii)(G)). This document also does not propose changes to
the publication requirements of 40 CFR 35.4110 that requires
publication of a notice in a local newspaper after EPA receives a
letter of intent to apply for a Technical Assistance Grant.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and
Executive Order 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011), this proposed
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore not
subject to OMB review. This action merely adds language to 40 CFR
300.415(n)(2)(i), 300.415(n)(4)(ii), 300.425(e)(4)(ii), 300.815(a),
300.820(a)(1), and 300.820(b)(l) to expand the methods by which the
lead agency can notify the public about certain Superfund activities.
This action will enable the lead agency to identify effective methods
to notify the public. This action does not impose any requirements on
any entity, including small entities. Therefore, pursuant to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), after considering
the economic impacts of this action on small entities, EPA certifies
that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This action does not contain any
unfunded mandates or significantly or uniquely affect small governments
as described in Sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1999 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). This action does not create new
binding legal requirements that substantially and directly affect
Tribes under Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action does not have significant Federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Because this
action has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this
proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order
13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks
and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it
require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898,
entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
This action does not involve technical standards; thus, the
requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272) do not apply.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.

    Dated: September 19, 2014.
Mathy Stanislaus,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

    For the reasons set forth in this preamble, Title 40, chapter 1, of
the Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 300-NATIONAL OIL AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES POLLUTION
CONTINGENCY PLAN

0
1. The authority citation for part 300 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(d); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O. 13626,
77 FR 56749, 3 CFR, 2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3
CFR, 1991 Comp., p.351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp.,
p.193.

0
2. Section 300.415 is amended by revising paragraphs (n)(2)(i) and
(n)(4)(ii) to read as follows:

Sec.  300.415  Removal action.

* * * * *
    (n) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (i) Publish a notice of availability of the administrative record
file established pursuant to Sec.  300.820 in a major local newspaper
of general circulation or use one or more other mechanisms to give
adequate notice to a community within 60 days of initiation of on-site
removal activity;
* * * * *
    (4) * * *
    (ii) Publish a notice of availability and brief description of the
EE/CA in a major local newspaper of general circulation or use one or
more other mechanisms to give adequate notice to a community pursuant
to Sec.  300.820;
* * * * *
0
3. Section 300.425 is amended by revising paragraph (e)(4)(ii) to read
as follows:

Sec.  300.425  Establishing remedial priorities.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (4) * * *
    (ii) In a major local newspaper of general circulation at or near
the release that is proposed for deletion, publish a notice of
availability or use one or more other mechanisms to give adequate
notice to a community of the intent to delete;
* * * * *
0
4. Section 300.815 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:

Sec.  300.815  Administrative record file for a remedial action.

    (a) The administrative record file for the selection of a remedial
action shall be made available for public inspection

at the commencement of the remedial investigation phase. At such time,
the lead agency shall publish in a major local newspaper of general
circulation a notice or use one or more other mechanisms to give
adequate notice to a community of the availability of the
administrative record file.
* * * * *
0
5. Section 300.820 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(1)
to read as follows:

Sec.  300.820  Administrative record file for a removal action.

    (a) * * *
    (1) The administrative record file shall be made available for
public inspection when the engineering evaluation/cost analysis (EE/CA)
is made available for public comment. At such time, the lead agency
shall publish in a major local newspaper of general circulation a
notice or use one or more other mechanisms to give adequate notice to a
community of the availability of the administrative record file.
* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) Documents included in the administrative record file shall be
made available for public inspection no later than 60 days after
initiation of on-site removal activity. At such time, the lead agency
shall publish in a major local newspaper of general circulation a
notice or use one or more other mechanisms to give adequate notice to a
community of the availability of the administrative record file.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-23371 Filed 9-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 15, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34869-34871]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14773]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2011-0199]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Truman-Hobbs Alteration of the Elgin Joliet &
Eastern Railroad Drawbridge; Illinois River, Morris, IL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
Illinois River near Morris, Illinois. This zone is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of the Illinois River due to the Truman-Hobbs
alteration of the Elgin Joliet & Eastern Railroad Drawbridge. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to protect the surrounding public
and vessels from the hazards associated with the alteration of the
Elgin Joliet & Eastern Railroad Drawbridge.

DATES: This rule is effective from 7 a.m. on June 23, 2011, until 7
a.m. on June 30, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0199 and are available online
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0199 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, contact or e-mail BM1 Adam Kraft, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Lake Michigan, at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you
have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when an agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because waiting for a notice and comment
period to run would be impracticable and contrary to the public
interest in that it would prevent the Coast Guard from protecting the
public and vessels on navigable waters.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the reasons discussed in the
preceding paragraph, a 30-day notice period would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest.

Background and Purpose

    The Truman-Hobbs alteration of the Elgin Joliet & Eastern Railroad
Drawbridge will begin on June 23, 2011. This temporary safety zone is
necessary to protect vessels from the hazards associated with those
alteration efforts. The falling debris associated with the removal and
replacement of the bridge spans poses a serious risk of injury to
persons and property. As such, the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, has determined that the alteration project of the Elgin
Joliet & Eastern Railroad Drawbridge poses significant risks to public
safety and property and that a safety zone is necessary.

Discussion of Rule

    The safety zone will encompass all U.S. navigable waters of the
Illinois River in the vicinity of the Elgin Joliet & Eastern Railroad
Drawbridge between Mile Marker 270.1 and Mile Marker 271.5 of the
Illinois River in Morris, IL. [DATUM: NAD 83].
    All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her
designated representative. Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within
the safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her designated representative.
The Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her designated
representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS). We conclude that this rule is not a significant
regulatory action because we anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will
not raise any novel legal or policy issues. The safety zone around the
bridge project will be relatively small and exist for relatively short
duration. Thus, restrictions on vessel movement within that particular
area are expected to be minimal. Under certain conditions, moreover,
vessels may still transit through the safety zone when permitted by the
Captain of the Port.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule will have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor on a portion of the Illinois River between 7 a.m. on
June 23, 2011 and 7 a.m. on June 30, 2011.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This
rule will only be enforced while unsafe conditions exist. Vessel
traffic will be minimal due to the public and commercial outreach that
has been made the by D8 Bridge Branch over the last 18 months.
    In the event that this temporary safety zone affects shipping,
commercial

vessels may request permission from the Captain of The Port, Sector
Lake Michigan, or his or her designated representative to transit
through the safety zone. The Coast Guard will give notice to the public
via a Broadcast to Mariners that the regulation is in effect.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. Small
businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who
enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and
the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman
evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness
to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of
the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a
safety zone and is therefore categorically excluded under paragraph
34(g) of the Instruction.
    A final environmental analysis checklist and categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191,
195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107-295, 116
Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0199 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T09-0199  Safety Zone; Truman-Hobbs alteration of the Elgin
Joliet & Eastern Railroad Drawbridge, Morris, Illinois

    (a) Location. The safety zone will encompass all U.S. navigable
waters of the Illinois River in the vicinity of the Elgin Joliet &
Eastern Railroad Drawbridge between Mile Marker 270.1

and Mile Marker 271.5 of the Illinois River in Morris, IL. [DATUM: NAD
83].
    (b) Effective and enforcement period. This rule is effective and
will be enforced from 7 a.m. on June 23, 2011, until 7 a.m. on June 30,
2011. If the alteration project is completed before June 30, 2011, the
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her designated
representative, may suspend the enforcement of this safety zone.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her designated representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his
or her designated representative.
    (3) The ``designated representative'' of the Captain of the Port,
Sector Lake Michigan, is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty
officer who has been designated by the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, to act on his or her behalf. The designated representative of
the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, will be on land in the
vicinity of the safety zone and will have constant communications with
the involved safety vessels that will be provided by the contracting
company, James McHugh Construction, and will have communications with a
D8 Bridge Branch representative, who will be on scene as well.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or
his or her designated representative to obtain permission to do so. The
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her designated
representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must comply
with all directions given to them by the Captain of the Port, Sector
Lake Michigan, or his or her designated representative.

    Dated: June 3, 2011.
L. Barndt,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2011-14773 Filed 6-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: June 27, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 123)]
[Notices]
[Page 35233-35235]
[DOCID:fr27jn07-58]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8331-8]

Federal Advisory Committee To Examine Detection and Quantitation
Approaches in Clean Water Act Programs

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; FACA Committee Meetings Announcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law
92-463, the Environmental Protection Agency is announcing four meetings
of the Federal Advisory Committee on Detection and Quantitation
Approaches and Uses in Clean Water Act (CWA) Programs (FACDQ).

DATES: The FACDQ plans to hold four meetings for the remainder of 2007.
Two of those meetings will be held via teleconference on July 25, 2007
and August 28, 2007. The teleconferences on July 25, 2007 and August
28, 2007 will be from 1 pm to 5 pm. All times are Eastern time. The
other two meetings will be held on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday,
September 19-21 and on December 5-7, 2007. The meetings on September
19-20, 2007, will be from 9 a.m. until 8 p.m.; and on September 21,
2007, from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m.; and the meetings on December 6-7, 2007,
will be from 9 a.m. until 8 p.m.; and on December 8, 2007, from 8 a.m.
until 3 p.m. All times are Eastern Time.

ADDRESSES: The July and August teleconferences are open to the public.
The public may obtain the call-in number and access code for the
teleconference lines from Meghan Hessenauer, whose contact information
is listed under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
notice. The September and December 2007 meetings of the Committee will
be held at the L. William Seidman Center, 3501 North Fairfax Drive,
Arlington, Virginia, across from the Virginia Square Metro stop on the
Orange line. Members of the public may attend this meeting in person or
via teleconference. The public may obtain the call-in number and access
code for the teleconference lines from Meghan Hessenauer, whose contact
information is listed under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
of this notice.
    Document Availability: The draft agenda for these meetings is
provided in the General Information section of this notice. The draft
agenda may also be viewed through EDOCKET, as provided

in section I.A. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice
or on our Web site at http://www.epa.gov/methods/det. Any member of the

public interested in making an oral presentation at the Committee
meeting may contact Richard Reding, whose contact information is listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this notice. Requests
for making oral presentations will be accepted up to 2 business days
prior to each meeting date. In general, each individual making an oral
presentation will be limited to a total of three minutes.

Submitting Comments

    Written comments may be submitted electronically, by mail, or
through hand delivery/courier. Follow the detailed instructions as
provided in section I.B of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
Written comments will be accepted up to two business days prior to each
meeting date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Meghan Hessenauer, Engineering and
Analysis Division, MC4303T, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; Telephone number: (202)
566-1040; Fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; E-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Richard Reding, Designated Federal Officer,

Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Mail Code 4303T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; Telephone number: (202)
566-2237; Fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; E-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

    This notice announces four meetings of the FACDQ. The purpose of
these meetings is to complete the evaluation and selection of a
procedure or procedures to calculate detection and quantitation limits,
and complete the Committee's recommendations to the EPA Administrator
for use of those detection and quantitation procedures and limits in
CWA programs. The meeting agendas are available on the internet at
http://www.epa.gov/methods/det.

Information on Services for Individuals With Disabilities

    For information on access or services for individuals with
disabilities, please contact Meghan Hessenauer at<PHONE_NUMBER> or e-
mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>to request accommodation of a
disability, at least ten days prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much
time as possible to process your request.
A. How Can I Get Copies of Related Information?
    1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this
committee under Docket ID NO., OW-2004-0041. The official public docket
consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any
public comments received, and other information related to this action.
Documents in the official public docket are listed in the index in
EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EDOCKET. Documents
are available either electronically or in hard copy. Electronic
documents may be viewed through EDOCKET. Hard copies of the draft
agendas may be viewed at the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket
Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the
OW Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    2. Electronic Access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the Federal Register
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.

    An electronic version of the public docket is available through
EDOCKET. You may use EDOCKET at http://www.epa.gov/edocket/. To submit

or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of
the official public docket, and to access those documents in the public
docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select
``search,'' then key in the appropriate docket identification number
(OW-2004-0041).
    For those wishing to make public comments, it is important to note
that EPA's policy is that comments, whether submitted electronically or
on paper, will be made available for public viewing in EPA's electronic
public docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless the
comment contains copyrighted material, confidential business
information (CBI), or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing copyrighted
material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in the version
of the comment that is placed in EPA's electronic public docket. The
entire printed comment, including the copyrighted material, will be
available in the public docket.
    Public comments submitted on computer disks mailed or delivered to
the docket will be transferred to EPA's electronic public docket.
Written public comments mailed or delivered to the Docket will be
scanned and placed in EPA's electronic public docket.
B. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?
    You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or through hand
delivery/courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the
appropriate docket identification number (OW-2004-0041) in the subject
line on the first page of your comment. Please ensure that your
comments are submitted within the specified comment period.
    1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as
prescribed below, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing
address, and an e-mail address or other contact information in the body
of your comment. Also include this contact information on the outside
of any disk or CD-ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying
the disk or CD-ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment, and it allows EPA to contact you if further
information on the substance of the comment is needed or if your
comment cannot be read due to technical difficulties. EPA's policy is
that EPA will not edit your comment, and any identifying or contact
information provided in the body of a comment will be included as part
of the comment placed in the official public docket and made available
in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your comment due
to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment.
    i. EDOCKET. Your use of EPA's electronic public docket to submit
comments to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving
comments. Go directly to EDOCKET at http://www.epa.gov/edocket/, and

follow the online instructions for submitting comments. To access EPA's
electronic public docket from the EPA Internet Home Page, http://www.epa.gov
, select ``Information Sources,'' ``Dockets,'' and

``EDOCKET.'' Once in the system, select ``search,'' and then key in
Docket ID No. OW-2004-0041. The system is an anonymous access system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
    ii. E-mail. Comments may be sent by electronic mail (e-mail) to

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Attention Docket ID No. OW-2004-0041. In contrast to
EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e-mail system is not an anonymous
access system. If you send an e-mail comment directly to the docket
without going through EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e-mail
system automatically captures your e-mail address. E-mail addresses
that are automatically captured by EPA's e-mail system are included as
part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and
made available in EPA's electronic public docket.
    iii. Disk or CD-ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD-ROM
mailed to the mailing address identified in section I.B.2 of this
notice. These electronic submissions will be accepted in Word,
WordPerfect or rich text files. Avoid the use of special characters and
any form of encryption.
    2. By Mail. Send your comments to: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, OW Docket, EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Mailcode: 2822T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, Attention Docket ID No.
OW-2004-0041.
    3. By Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to: EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC), Room 3334, EPA West Building, 1301 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, Attention Docket ID No. OW-2004-0041
(Note: This is not a mailing address). Such deliveries are only
accepted during the docket's normal hours of operation as identified in
section I.A.1 of this notice.

    Dated: June 21, 2007.
Richard Reding,
Designated Federal Officer.
 [FR Doc. E7-12448 Filed 6-26-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


August 3, 2005 Memo to Docket RE: Incorporation by Reference   Docket OAR 2005 0154 From: Jan King The contents of Docket OAR 2001 0008 for the rulemaking " Interstate Ozone Transport: Response to Court Decisions on the NOx SIP Call, NOx SIP Call Technical Amendments, and Section 126 Rules," and Docket OAR 2004 0440 for the proposal " Stay of the Findings of Significant Contribution and Rulemaking for Georgia for Purposes of Reducing Ozone Interstate Transport" are hereby incorporated by reference into Docket OAR 2005 0154.


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 72432]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29372]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

[Docket DOT-OST-2012-0108]

Application of Boutique Air, Inc. for Commuter Air Carrier
Authority

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2012-11-32).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding Boutique
Air, Inc., fit, willing, and able, and awarding it commuter air carrier
authority to conduct scheduled commuter service.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than
December 19, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in
Docket DOT-OST-2012-0108 and addressed to Docket Operations, (M-30,
Room W12-140), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, and should be served upon the parties
listed in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Snoden, Air Carrier Fitness
Division (X-56, Room W86-471), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 29, 2012.
Robert Letteney,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, For Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2012-29372 Filed 12-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


[Federal Register: November 24, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 226)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 71530-71532]
[DOCID:fr24no10-4]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-1155; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-238-AD;
Amendment 39-16527; AD 2010-24-08]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; DASSAULT AVIATION Model MYSTERE-FALCON
50 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    On two occurrences on Myst[egrave]re-Falcon 50 aeroplanes in
service, it was detected that two pipes of the emergency brake
system 2 located near the nose landing gear bearing were
swapped.
    The swapping of these two pipes implies that when the Left Hand
(LH) brake pedal is depressed, the Right Hand (RH) brake unit is
activated, and conversely, when the RH brake pedal is depressed, the
LH brake unit is actuated. This constitutes an unsafe condition,
which may go unnoticed as the condition is latent until the
emergency brake system 2 is used. This condition, if not
corrected, could ultimately lead to a runway excursion of the
aeroplane.
* * * * *

This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: This AD becomes effective December 9, 2010.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of December 9,
2010.
    We must receive comments on this AD by January 10, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Emergency Airworthiness Directive 2010-0208-E, dated October 12, 2010
(referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    On two occurrences on Myst[egrave]re-Falcon 50 aeroplanes in
service, it was detected that

two pipes of the emergency brake system 2 located near the
nose landing gear bearing were swapped.
    The swapping of these two pipes implies that when the Left Hand
(LH) brake pedal is depressed, the Right Hand (RH) brake unit is
activated, and conversely, when the RH brake pedal is depressed, the
LH brake unit is actuated. This constitutes an unsafe condition,
which may go unnoticed as the condition is latent until the
emergency brake system 2 is used. This condition, if not
corrected, could ultimately lead to a runway excursion of the
aeroplane.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires an
[general visual] inspection of the main landing gear braking system
and, in case of findings, proper re-installation of the emergency
brake system 2 pipes. This [EASA] AD also requires painting
the affected pipes for clear identification in order to avoid
mistakes while reinstalling them after maintenance.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    DASSAULT AVIATION has issued Service Bulletin F50-515, dated
October 12, 2010. The actions described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of this AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined the unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between the AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the AD.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because this
unsafe condition could result in a high speed runway excursion when the
brakes are applied. Therefore, we determined that notice and
opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are impracticable
and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in fewer
than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-1155; Directorate
Identifier 2010-NM-238-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended].

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2010-24-08 Dassault Aviation: Amendment 39-16527. Docket No. FAA-
2010-1155; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-238-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective December
9, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to DASSAULT AVIATION Model MYSTERE-FALCON 50
airplanes, certificated in any category, all serial numbers.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
Gear.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continued airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    On two occurrences on Myst[egrave]re-Falcon 50 aeroplanes in
service, it was detected that two pipes of the emergency brake
system 2 located near the nose landing gear bearing were
swapped.
    The swapping of these two pipes implies that when the Left Hand
(LH) brake pedal is depressed, the Right Hand (RH) brake unit is
activated, and conversely, when the RH brake pedal is depressed, the
LH brake unit is actuated. This constitutes an unsafe condition,
which may go unnoticed as the condition is latent until the
emergency brake system 2 is used. This condition, if not
corrected,
* * * * *

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Actions

    (g) Within 7 days after the effective date of this AD, do a
general visual inspection for correct installation (as defined in
Dassault Service Bulletin F50-515, dated October 12, 2010) of the
emergency brake system number 2, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Dassault Service Bulletin F50-515,
dated October 12, 2010, except that work required by this AD can
only be done by persons prescribed in 14 CFR 43.3 and 43.7.
    (h) If the emergency brake system number 2 is found installed
incorrectly during the inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
AD: Before further flight, install the emergency brake system number
2 correctly, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Dassault Service Bulletin F50-515, dated October 12, 2010.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows:
    (1) European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2010-0208-E, dated
October 12, 2010, has a compliance time of ``before the next flight
after the effective date of this AD.'' This AD requires that the
actions be done within 7 days after the effective date of this AD.
    (2) EASA AD 2010-0208-E, dated October 12, 2010, allows the
flightcrew to inspect the emergency brake system number 2 specified
in accordance with Dassault Service Bulletin F50-515, dated October
12, 2010. However, this AD requires the inspection to be performed
by certificated maintenance personnel.

    (3) EASA AD 2010-0208-E, dated October 12, 2010, requires
painting the pipes end of the emergency brake system number 2 and
related unions within 7 months after the effective date of that AD.
This AD does not require painting the pipes end of the emergency
brake system number 2 and related unions. We might consider
additional rulemaking to require this action in the future.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (i) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (j) Refer to MCAI EASA AD 2010-0208-E, dated October 12, 2010;
and Dassault Service Bulletin F50-515, dated October 12, 2010; for
related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (k) You must use Dassault Service Bulletin F50-515, dated
October 12, 2010, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the
AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, New Jersey
07606; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet http://
www.dassaultfalcon.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington on November 15, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-29458 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60833-60834]
[FR Doc No: 2018-25781]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1933-009; ER12-1934-008.
    Applicants: Interstate Power and Light Company, Wisconsin Power and
Light Company.
    Description: Supplement to June 29, 2018 Updated Triennial Market
Power analysis for the Central region of Interstate Power and Light
Company, et. al.
    Filed Date: 11/20/18.
    Accession Number: 20181120-5053.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-273-001.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Errata to Twiggs County Solar
(Twiggs Solar) LGIA Amendment Filing to be effective 10/26/2018.
    Filed Date: 11/20/18.
    Accession Number: 20181120-5089.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-367-000.
    Applicants: Pixelle Specialty Solutions LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: MBRA Tariff to be effective
11/20/2018.
    Filed Date: 11/19/18.
    Accession Number: 20181119-5207.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/10/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-368-000.
    Applicants: Yasmin Partners LLC.
    Description: Notice of Cancellation of Market-Based Rate Tariff of
Yasmin Partners LLC.
    Filed Date: 11/19/18.

    Accession Number: 20181119-5216.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/10/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-369-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., ALLETE,
Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2018-11-20_SA 3213 MP-GRE
ICA (Stinson) to be effective 11/21/2018.
    Filed Date: 11/20/18.
    Accession Number: 20181120-5030.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-370-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original ISA SA No. 5235;
Queue No. AB2-068 to be effective 10/23/2018.
    Filed Date: 11/20/18.
    Accession Number: 20181120-5081.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-371-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 1884R8 Westar Energy, Inc.
NITSA NOA to be effective 11/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 11/20/18.
    Accession Number: 20181120-5084.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-372-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 1885R8 Westar Energy, Inc.
NITSA NOA to be effective 11/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 11/20/18.
    Accession Number: 20181120-5087.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-373-000.
    Applicants: Paulding Wind Farm II LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Reactive Power Compensation
Filing to be effective 1/19/2019.
    Filed Date: 11/20/18.
    Accession Number: 20181120-5094.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-374-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revised Formula Rate TO
Tariff--Retail Rate Revisions to be effective 1/21/2019.
    Filed Date: 11/20/18.
    Accession Number: 20181120-5099.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-375-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Florida, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: DEF-Florida Power & Light
(RS-81) Amendment to be effective 11/30/2018.
    Filed Date: 11/20/18.
    Accession Number: 20181120-5117.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-376-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: First Revised ISA, SA No.
4592; Queue No. AC1-182 to be effective 10/23/2018.
    Filed Date: 11/20/18.
    Accession Number: 20181120-5118.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-377-000.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Service Agreement No. 216--
Amendment No. 5 to be effective 11/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 11/20/18.
    Accession Number: 20181120-5125.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-378-000.
    Applicants: Montour, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Reactive Service Rate
Schedule Filing to be effective 2/17/2019.
    Filed Date: 11/20/18.
    Accession Number: 20181120-5126.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-379-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original WMPA SA No. 5244;
Queue No. AD1-085 to be effective 11/14/2018.
    Filed Date: 11/20/18.
    Accession Number: 20181120-5138.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-380-000.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Service Agreement No. 362
NITS with City of Williams to be effective 11/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 11/20/18.
    Accession Number: 20181120-5155.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/11/18.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
reliability filings:

    Docket Numbers: RR19-2-000.
    Applicants: North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
    Description: Petition of the North American Electric Reliability
Corporation for Approval of Proposed Revisions to the Standard
Processes Manual, Appendix 3A to the NERC Rules of Procedure.
    Filed Date: 11/19/18.
    Accession Number: 20181119-5222.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/10/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 20, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-25781 Filed 11-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42097-42098]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17441]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP15-523-000]

American Midstream (Midla), LLC; Notice of Application

    Take notice that on June 29, 2015, American Midstream (Midla), LLC
(Midla) filed an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission pursuant to section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA)
requesting authority to construct its Natchez Pipeline, consisting of
approximately 51.97 miles of 12-inch-diameter pipeline and
approximately 0.5 miles of 4-inch-diameter lateral pipeline from
interconnections with Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. and
Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLC in the Winnsboro, Louisiana area,
through Franklin, Catahoula, and Concordia Parishes, Louisiana, under
the Mississippi River, and into Adams County, Mississippi to the
Natchez, Mississippi area. The Natchez Pipeline will provide up to
48,300 Dekatherms per day at an estimated cost of $66.2 million, all as
more fully set forth in the application which is on file with the
Commission and open to public inspection.
    This filing is available for review at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site web at
http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY,
(202) 502-8659.
    Any questions regarding the application should be directed to
Dennis J. Kelly, Senior Counsel for Midla, 1400 16th Street, Suite 300,
Denver, CO 80202, by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance

with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA
(18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party status will be placed on the
service list maintained by the Secretary of the Commission and will
receive copies of all documents filed by the applicant and by all other
parties. A party must submit seven copies of filings made in the
proceeding with the Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant
and to every other party. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for
court review of Commission orders in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commentors will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentors will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and seven copies of the protest or intervention to
the Federal Energy regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 31, 2015

    Dated: July 10, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-17441 Filed 7-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 82 (Thursday, April 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23806-23807]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10269]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-3416-000]

Alta Wind VI, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Alta Wind VI, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to

intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is May 12, 2011.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 22, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-10269 Filed 4-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P