[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 55 (Friday, March 21, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15660-15665]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04852]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-1318; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-104-AD;
Amendment 39-17789; AD 2014-05-16]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 747-200B, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F
series airplanes, and Model 767 series airplanes, powered by General
Electric (GE) CF6-80C2 engines. This AD was prompted by reports of
failure of the electro mechanical brake flexshaft (short flexshaft) of
the thrust reverser actuation system (TRAS). This AD requires replacing
the short flexshaft on each engine with a new short flexshaft, testing
of the electro mechanical brake and center drive unit (CDU) cone brake
to verify the holding torque, and performing related investigative and
corrective actions if necessary. We are issuing this AD to prevent an
uncommanded in-flight thrust reverser deployment and consequent loss of
control of the airplane.

DATES: This AD is effective April 25, 2014.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of April 25,
2014.

ADDRESSES: For Boeing service information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    For Middle River Aircraft Systems service information identified in
this AD, contact Middle River Aircraft Systems, 103 Chesapeake Park
Plaza, Baltimore, MD 21220; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.mras-usa.com/contact.html.
    You may view this referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-
227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tung Tran, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-
917-6505; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 747-200B, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F series airplanes,
and Model 767 series airplanes, powered by General Electric (GE) CF6-
80C2 engines. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on January 16,
2013 (78 FR 3363). The NPRM was prompted by reports of failure of the
electro mechanical brake flexshaft (short flexshaft) of the thrust
reverser actuation system (TRAS). The NPRM proposed to require
replacing the short flexshaft on each engine with a new short
flexshaft, testing of the electro-mechanical brake and center drive
unit (CDU) cone brake to verify the holding torque, and performing
related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. We are
issuing this AD to prevent an uncommanded in-flight thrust reverser
deployment and consequent loss of control of the airplane.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
(78 FR 3363, January 16, 2013) and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Clarify Applicability and Reliability Difference Between
Engine Models

    Air France Industries asked if the thrust reversers on GE CF6-80E1
powered airplanes are addressed by the NPRM (78 FR 3363, January 16,
2013), and if the flexshaft reliability difference between GE CF6-80C2
and CF6-80E1 engines is due to the systematic introduction of the
double P-Seal on translating cowls on GE CF6-80E1 engines.
    We agree to clarify why the NPRM (78 FR 3363, January 16, 2013) did
not address the GE CF6-80E1 thrust reversers. This final rule was
prompted by reports of failure of the electro-mechanical brake
flexshaft (short flexshaft) of the TRAS on Model 747 and Model 767
airplanes powered by GE CF6-80C2 engines. Therefore, we did not conduct
a safety assessment on airplanes powered by GE CF6-80E1 engines. We
have not determined that the double P-Seal was a contributing factor to
the failure of the flexshaft on GE CF6-80C2 engines. We are aware that
this defective flexshaft could be installed on other engines. We have
contacted the appropriate office to address the safety concerns
regarding this defective flexshaft on other airplane models, and might
consider additional rulemaking if an unsafe condition is identified on
other engines. We have not changed this final rule in this regard.

Request To Include Additional Service Information

    UPS requested that we allow the use of Middle River Aircraft
Systems (MRAS) CF6-80C2B Service Bulletin 78-1168, Revision 1, dated
August 26, 2010, to comply with the flexshaft replacement proposed by
paragraph (g) of the NPRM (78 FR 3363, January 16, 2013). UPS stated
that it has fully complied with the flexshaft replacement requirement
using this service information.
    We agree with the commenter's request. Since we issued the NPRM (78
FR 3363, January 16, 2013), we have determined that flexshaft
replacements done in accordance with Middle River Aircraft Systems CF6-
80C2B Service Bulletin 78-1168, Revision 1, dated August 26, 2010; and
Revision 2, dated April 19, 2011; meet the intent of this final rule.
We have changed paragraph (g) of this final rule to include Middle
River Aircraft Systems CF6-80C2B Service Bulletin 78-1168, Revision 2,
dated April 19, 2011, as an appropriate source of service information;
and we have also added new paragraph (m) to this final rule to provide
credit for actions done prior to the effective date of this final rule
using Middle River Aircraft Systems CF6-80C2B Service Bulletin 78-1168,
Revision 1, dated August 26, 2010. We have redesignated subsequent
paragraphs accordingly.

Request To Update Parts Cost

    MRAS provided current cost data and requested that we update the
estimated parts costs accordingly.
    We agree to update the estimated parts costs. We have changed the
estimated parts cost to $4,031 for each flexshaft, which changes the
estimated parts cost to $32,248 for a Model 747 airplane, and to
$16,124 for a Model 767 airplane.

Request To Change Parts Installation Prohibition Paragraph

    Boeing and MRAS requested that we change paragraph (k) of the NPRM
(78 FR 3363, January 16, 2013), which would prohibit installation of
part number (P/N) 3278500-( ), on any airplane, to specify that this
prohibition applies only to Boeing airplanes. MRAS stated that P/N
3278500-( ) is still certified on Airbus Model A330 airplanes.
    We partially agree with the commenters' request. This final rule
applies only to the airplanes identified in paragraph (c) of this final
rule. Paragraph (k) of this final rule specifies ``any airplane,''
which refers to the airplanes identified in paragraph (c) of this final
rule. However, to add clarity to this final rule, we have revised
paragraph (k) of this final rule to specify that the parts prohibition
applies only to the airplanes identified in paragraph (c) of this final
rule.

Request To Clarify CDU Cone Brake Replacement Action

    Boeing and MRAS requested that we change the fifth paragraph of the
Relevant Service Information section of the NPRM (78 FR 3363, January
16, 2013), which specified that the corrective action for a CDU cone
brake test failure is replacement of the CDU cone brake with a new CDU
cone brake. The commenters stated that the cone brake is not a line-
replaceable unit (LRU), and that if a CDU cone brake fails, the entire
CDU must be replaced with a serviceable CDU. MRAS stated that the cone
brake within the CDU can be replaced only in a component maintenance
shop.
    We agree that the cone brake is not an LRU, and that the corrective
action for a CDU cone brake test failure is replacement of the CDU with
a new or serviceable CDU. Paragraph (i) of this final rule requires
doing the corrective action for a failed cone brake functional test in
accordance with certain applicable service information, which does
specify replacing the CDU--not just the cone brake--after a failed
test. The Relevant Service Information

paragraph of the NPRM (78 FR 3363, January 16, 2013) is not repeated in
this final rule; therefore, we have not changed this final rule in this
regard.

Request To Extend the Repetitive Inspection Interval

    Air New Zealand (ANZ) requested that we extend the repetitive
inspection interval specified in paragraph (h) of the NPRM (78 FR 3363,
January 16, 2013) to 3,000 flight hours or greater. ANZ cited several
previous alternative methods of compliance (AMOC) approvals for issued
ADs to extend the inspection intervals on the thrust reverser CDU cone
brake and the electro-mechanical brakes.
    We do not agree to extend the repetitive inspection interval
proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 3363, January 16, 2013) to 3,000 flight
hours or greater. The AMOC extension to inspection intervals to 3,000
flight hours or greater was granted based on a fault tree analysis that
assumed the engine cowl anti-ice system was causing the short flexshaft
to fail. We now have enough data to invalidate that assumption. As part
of the certification process of the new flexshaft, the system safety
analyses on all Model 747 and Model 767 airplanes with GE CF6-80C2
engines were refined, and the predicted failure rate from the
comparative testing was used. We have determined that we could meet
average and specific risk requirements with an inspection interval of
2,000 flight hours for both the CDU cone brake and TRAS lock flexshaft.
Therefore, we have determined that a repetitive inspection interval of
2,000 flight hours is necessary to address the unsafe condition. We
have not changed this final rule in this regard.

Request To Combine Multiple ADs Into One AD

    ANZ requested that we combine the following ADs into one new AD to
reduce the complexity of multiple regulatory requirements.
     AD 2003-16-16, Amendment 39-13269 (68 FR 51439, August 27,
2003).
     AD 2000-15-04, Amendment 39-11833 (65 FR 47252, August 2,
2000).
     AD 2000-09-04, Amendment 39-11712 (65 FR 25833, May 4,
2000).
    We partially agree with the commenter's request. We agree with the
commenter about the complexity of complying with multiple regulatory
requirements. We disagree with the request to combine the requirements
of these ADs into one new AD, because this final rule is not the proper
venue for addressing this issue. We are issuing this final rule to
require replacement of the short flexshaft with a better and more
reliable part. We have considered the previous rulemaking by allowing
this new part replacement and repetitive inspections to be a
terminating action for the repetitive inspections set by previous ADs,
as specified in paragraph (j) of this final rule. We have not changed
this final rule in this regard.

Request To Add Airplanes to the Applicability

    Boeing requested that we include Model 767 airplanes powered by GE
CF6-80C2 engines in the applicability of the NPRM (78 FR 3363, January
16, 2013); and require all production airplanes to do the requirements
of paragraph (h) of the NPRM. Boeing stated that AD 2000-09-04,
Amendment 39-11712 (65 FR 25833, May 5, 2000), which is applicable to
Model 767 airplanes powered by GE CF6-80C2 engines, mandates the
inspection of the TRAS lock flexshaft and CDU cone brake at 1,000
hours, and that these airplanes should be able to use the extended
2,000-hour TRAS lock flexshaft and CDU tests granted in the NPRM.
    We disagree with the commenter's request. Adding airplanes to the
applicability would necessitate (under the provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act) reissuing the notice, reopening the
comment period, considering additional comments subsequently received,
and eventually issuing a final rule. In consideration of the amount of
time that has already elapsed since issuance of the original notice (78
FR 3363, January 16, 2013), we have determined that further delay of
this final rule is not appropriate. However, we might consider further
rulemaking on this issue. We have not changed this final rule in this
regard.

Request To Allow Dispatch of an Airplane With a Failed CDU Cone Brake
Check

    Boeing requested that we allow a master minimum equipment list
(MMEL) dispatch of an airplane when a CDU cone brake check fails.
Boeing stated that a certain FAA AMOC approval letter already allows
for an MMEL dispatch of an airplane when only the CDU cone brake check
fails.
    We agree with the commenter's request. The electro-mechanical brake
provides an additional level of protection against the inadvertent in-
flight deployment of the thrust reverser. We have added new paragraph
(l) to this final rule, which specifies that in the event of a CDU cone
brake failure, an airplane may be operated as specified in the
operator's FAA-approved minimum equipment list, provided that certain
conditions are met. We have redesignated subsequent paragraphs
accordingly.

Requests for Terminating Action

    Boeing requested we specify that the functional tests in paragraph
(h) of the NPRM (78 FR 3363, January 16, 2013) terminate the functional
test requirements of paragraph (e), as well as paragraph (f), of AD
2000-09-04, Amendment 39-11712 (65 FR 25833, May 4, 2000).
    Delta Airlines requested we specify that the functional tests in
paragraph (h) of the NPRM (78 FR 3363, January 16, 2013) terminate the
requirements of paragraph (a), as well as paragraph (e), of AD 2003-16-
16, Amendment 39-13269 (68 FR 51439, August 27, 2003).
    We agree with the commenters' requests. The functional tests
required by paragraph (h) of this final rule address the tests required
by the AD requirements cited by the commenters. We have changed
paragraphs (j)(1) and (j)(3) of this final rule, as specified by the
commenter.

Request for Credit for Previous Actions

    Atlas Air requested that we give credit for the actions required by
paragraph (h) of the NPRM (78 FR 3363, January 16, 2013), if those
actions were done before the effective date of this AD using the
service information specified in paragraph (h) of the NPRM.
    Specifying credit for the actions done before the effective date of
this final rule using the same service information specified in
paragraph (h) of this final rule is unnecessary. Paragraph (f) of this
final rule specifies to comply with the AD within the compliance times
specified, unless already done. We have not changed this final rule in
this regard.

Requests for Clarification of Installation Instructions

    American Airlines (AAL) requested that we revise paragraph (g) of
the NPRM (78 FR 3363, January 16, 2013) to clarify that the
installation instructions for the new short flexshaft contain a lower
torque value than the torque value specified in AD 2000-09-04,
Amendment 39-11712 (65 FR 25833, May 4, 2000), and the service
information referenced in AD 2000-09-04.
    We agree to clarify the installation instructions. The torque value
for the new short flexshaft installation in paragraph (g) is lower than
the torque value described for the part specified in AD 2000-09-04,
Amendment 39-11712 (65 FR 25833, May 4, 2000). We have

added Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this final rule to clarify this issue.

Request for Clarification of Compliance Time

    AAL requested we clarify that the compliance time of paragraph (h)
of the NPRM (78 FR 3363, January 16, 2013) supersedes the compliance
times specified in AD 2000-09-04, Amendment 39-11712 (65 FR 25833, May
4, 2000); Boeing Service Bulletin 767-78A0081, Revision 2, dated April
19, 2001; and FAA AMOC 140S-03-313, dated December 19, 2003.
    We agree to clarify the compliance time. This final rule does not
supersede AD 2000-09-04, Amendment 39-11712 (65 FR 25833, May 4, 2000).
FAA AMOC 140S-03-313, dated December 19, 2003, applies to AD 2000-09-
04, and not to this final rule. We have determined that the functional
test compliance times specified in paragraph (h) of this final rule are
necessary to ensure the continued airworthiness of the airplane. Under
the provisions of paragraph (n) of this final rule, however, we may
consider requests for adjustments to the compliance time if data are
submitted to substantiate that such an adjustment would provide an
acceptable level of safety. We have not changed this final rule in this
regard.

Request for Certain Hardware Approvals

    AAL requested that we approve FAA AMOC 140S-12-42, dated March 14,
2012, as an AMOC to the NPRM (78 FR 3363, January 16, 2013), or
specifically list the hardware approvals and actions in AMOC 140S-12-42
dated March 14, 2012, in the NPRM.
    We disagree with the commenter's requests. The commenter did not
provide data to substantiate that the hardware actions specified in FAA
AMOC 140S-12-42, dated March 14, 2012, are applicable to the new short
flexshaft installation required by this final rule. Under the
provisions of paragraph (n) of this final rule, however, we will
consider requests for approval of an AMOC if sufficient data are
submitted to substantiate that alternative hardware requirements would
provide an acceptable level of safety. We have not changed this final
rule in this regard.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (78 FR 3363, January 16, 2013) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 3363, January 16, 2013).
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 298 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
               Action                         Labor cost            Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement Model 747 airplanes....  8 work-hours x $85 per hour         $32,248         $32,928      $2,370,816
(72 airplanes).....................   = $680.
Replacement Model 767 airplanes....  4 work-hours x $85 per hour          16,124          16,464       3,720,864
(226 airplanes)....................   = $340.
Functional test....................  12 work-hours x $85 per                   0           1,020          73,440
Model 747 airplanes................   hour = $1,020.
(72 airplanes).....................
Functional test....................  12 work-hours x $85 per                   0           1,020         230,520
Model 767 airplanes................   hour = $1,020.
(226 airplanes)....................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2014-05-16 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17789; Docket No. FAA-
2012-1318; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-104-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective April 25, 2014.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD affects AD 2003-16-16, Amendment 39-13269 (68 FR 51439,
August 27, 2003); AD 2000-15-04, Amendment 39-11833 (65 FR 47252,
August 2, 2000); and AD 2000-09-04, Amendment 39-11712 (65 FR 25833,
May 4, 2000).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company airplanes, certificated in
any category, powered by General Electric (GE) CF6-80C2 engines, as
identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD.
    (1) Model 747-200B, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, and 747-400F
series airplanes, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-78A2185, dated October 26, 2010.
    (2) Model 767-200, -300, -300F, and -400ER series airplanes, as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-78A0100, dated
October 26, 2010.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7830, Thrust
reverser.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of failure of the electro-
mechanical brake flexshaft (short flexshaft) of the thrust reverser
actuation system (TRAS). We are issuing this AD to prevent an
uncommanded in-flight thrust reverser deployment and consequent loss
of control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Flexible Drive Shaft Replacement

    Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD, replace
the short flexshaft on each thrust reverser half of each engine with
a new short flexshaft, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-78A2185, dated
October 26, 2010; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-78A0100,
dated October 26, 2010; as applicable; or Middle River Aircraft
Systems CF6-80C2B Service Bulletin 78-1168, Revision 2, dated April
19, 2011.

    Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: The torque value for the
short flexshaft installation specified in paragraph (g) of this AD
is lower than the torque value described for the part specified in
AD 2000-09-04, Amendment 39-11712 (65 FR 25833, May 4, 2000).

(h) Functional Test

    Within 2,000 flight hours after accomplishment of the short
flexshaft replacements required by paragraph (g) of this AD: Do a
functional test on the electro-mechanical brakes and the cone brake
of the center drive unit (CDU) to verify the holding torque, on all
thrust reversers and on all engines, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-78A2166,
Revision 3, dated July 29, 2004 (for Model 747 airplanes); Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 767-78A0081, Revision 2, dated April 19, 2001
(for Model 767-200, -300, and -300F airplanes); or Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 767-78A0088, dated April 19, 2001 (for Model 767-
400ER airplanes). Repeat the functional test thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 2,000 flight hours.

(i) Corrective Action

    If any functional test required by paragraph (h) of this AD
fails: Before further flight, do related investigative and
corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-78A2166, Revision 3,
dated July 29, 2004 (for Model 747 airplanes); Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 767-78A0081, Revision 2, dated April 19, 2001 (for Model
767-200, -300, and -300F airplanes); or Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 767-78A0088, dated April 19, 2001 (for Model 767-400ER
airplanes); and repeat the applicable test or check until
successfully accomplished.

(j) Terminating Actions

    (1) Accomplishment of the initial test specified in paragraph
(h) of this AD terminates the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (e)
of AD 2003-16-16, Amendment 39-13269 (68 FR 51439, August 27, 2003),
for Model 747-400 series airplanes powered by GE Model CF6-80C2
series engines.
    (2) Accomplishment of the initial test specified in paragraph
(h) of this AD terminates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2000-15-04, Amendment 39-11833 (65 FR 47252, August 2, 2000), for
Model 747-200 and -300 series airplanes powered by General Electric
Model CF6-80C2 series engines.
    (3) Accomplishment of the initial test specified in paragraph
(h) of this AD terminates the requirements of paragraphs (e) and (f)
of AD 2000-09-04, Amendment 39-11712 (65 FR 25833, May 4, 2000), for
Model 767 series airplanes powered by General Electric Model CF6-
80C2 series engines.

(k) Parts Installation Prohibition

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a
flexshaft having part number 3278500-( ) on any airplane identified
in paragraph (c) of this AD.

(l) Operation With a CDU Cone Brake Failure

    In the event of a CDU cone brake failure, an airplane may be
operated as specified in the operator's FAA-approved minimum
equipment list, provided that the conditions specified in paragraphs
(l)(1) through (l)(3) of this AD, as applicable, are met.
    (1) Only one CDU cone brake check on any engine thrust reverser
on the Model 767 airplane has failed.
    (2) The electro-mechanical brake (TRAS lock) on the inoperative
thrust reverser must be locked in the forward thrust position.
    (3) Since the most recent flight, and before further flight, on
the affected engine, the electro-mechanical brake (TRAS lock)
holding torque is determined to be acceptable in accordance with the
function test specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.

(m) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using Middle River Aircraft Systems CF6-80C2B
Service Bulletin 78-1168, Revision 1, dated August 26, 2010, which
is not incorporated by reference in this AD.

(n) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (o)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.

(o) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Tung Tran,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference may be obtained at the addresses specified
in paragraphs (p)(4) and (p)(5) of this AD.

(p) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.

    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-78A2185, dated October 26,
2010.
    (ii) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-78A0081, Revision 2,
dated April 19, 2001.
    (iii) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-78A0088, dated April 19,
2001.
    (iv) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-78A0100, dated October
26, 2010.
    (v) Boeing Service Bulletin 747-78A2166, Revision 3, dated July
29, 2004.
    (vi) Middle River Aircraft Systems CF6-80C2B Service Bulletin
78-1168, Revision 2, dated April 19, 2011.
    (3) For Boeing service information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) For Middle River Aircraft Systems service information
identified in this AD, contact Middle River Aircraft Systems, ATTN:
Commercial Spares Support, Mail Point 46, 103 Chesapeake Park Plaza,
Baltimore, MD 21220; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (5) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
    (6) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.*COM019*

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 18, 2014.
Ross Landes,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-04852 Filed 3-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: May 9, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 89)]
[Notices]
[Page 26946]
[DOCID:fr09my06-73]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-333-000]

Southern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes to FERC
Gas Tariff

May 2, 2006.
    Take notice that on April 28, 2006, Southern Natural Gas Company
(Southern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Seventh
Revised Volume No. 1 (Tariff) the following revised sheets to become
effective June 1, 2006:

First Revised Sheet No. 5.
First Revised Sheet No. 5A .
Second Revised Sheet No. 6.
Second Revised Sheet No. 7.
Original Sheet No. 7A.
Original Sheet No. 7B.
Original Sheet No. 7C.
Original Sheet No. 7D.
Original Sheet No. 7E.
Second Revised Sheet No. 8.
Second Revised Sheet No. 9.
Original Sheet No. 9A.
Original Sheet No. 9B.
Second Revised Sheet No. 10.
Second Revised Sheet No. 11.
Original Sheet No. 11A.
Original Sheet No. 11B.
Original Sheet No. 11C.
Original Sheet No. 11D.
Original Sheet No. 11E.
Second Revised Sheet No. 12.
Second Revised Sheet No. 13.
Original Sheet No. 13A.
Original Sheet No. 13B.
Original Sheet No. 13C.
Original Sheet No. 13D.
Original Sheet No. 13E.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Sec.  154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone
filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on
the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before
the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-6978 Filed 5-8-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 15, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 28551]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11448]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2012-0968 FRL-9812-1]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Ohio; Canton-Massillon 1997 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan Revision to
Approved Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve the request by Ohio to revise the
Canton-Massillon, Ohio, 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance air quality State
Implementation Plan (SIP) under the Clean Air Act to replace the
previously approved motor vehicle emissions budgets with budgets
developed using EPA's Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES)
emissions model. Ohio submitted the SIP revision request to EPA on
November 26, 2012.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 14, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2012-0968, by one of the following methods:
    1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Control Strategies
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information. The Regional Office official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal
holidays.
    Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules
section of this Federal Register for detailed instructions on how to
submit comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Maietta, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch
(AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the state's SIP submittal as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because EPA views this as a
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no
further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the
direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received
will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed
rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For
additional information, see the direct final rule which is located in
the Rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: April 30, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2013-11448 Filed 5-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38723-38725]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16551]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2015-0001]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Final notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: New or modified Base (1-percent annual chance) Flood
Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)
boundaries or zone designations, and/or regulatory floodways
(hereinafter referred to as flood hazard determinations) as shown on
the indicated Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) for each of the communities
listed in the table below are finalized. Each LOMR revises the Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and in some cases the Flood Insurance
Study (FIS) reports, currently in effect for the listed communities.
The flood hazard determinations modified by each LOMR will be used to
calculate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and their
contents.

DATES: The effective date for each LOMR is indicated in the table
below.

ADDRESSES: Each LOMR is available for inspection at both the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the table below and online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
(email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) makes the final flood hazard determinations as shown in the
LOMRs for each community listed in the table below. Notice of these
modified flood hazard determinations has been published in newspapers
of local circulation and 90 days have elapsed since that publication.
The Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation has resolved any
appeals resulting from this notification.
    The modified flood hazard determinations are made pursuant to
section 206 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4105, and are in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Act of
1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq., and with 44 CFR part 65.
    For rating purposes, the currently effective community number is
shown and must be used for all new policies and renewals.
    The new or modified flood hazard information is the basis for the
floodplain management measures that the community is required either to
adopt or to show evidence of being already in effect in order to remain
qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).
    This new or modified flood hazard information, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities.
    This new or modified flood hazard determinations are used to meet
the floodplain management requirements of the NFIP and also are used to
calculate the appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new
buildings, and for the contents in those buildings. The changes in
flood hazard determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    Interested lessees and owners of real property are encouraged to
review the final flood hazard information available at the address
cited below for each community or online through the FEMA Map Service
Center at www.msc.fema.gov.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Date: June 16, 2015.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation, Department
of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Chief executive officer       Community map                                       Community
         State and county           Location and case No.         of community             repository        Effective date of modification      No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama:
    Montgomery (FEMA Docket No.: B- City of Montgomery     The Honorable Todd         City Hall, 103 North  April 30, 2015.................       010174
     1474).                          (15-04-0687P).         Strange, Mayor, City of    Perry Street,
                                                            Montgomery, P.O. Box       Montgomery, AL
                                                            1111, Montgomery, AL       36104.
                                                            36104.
    Montgomery (FEMA Docket No.: B- Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Elton Dean,  25 Aupuni Street,     April 30, 2015.................       010278
     1474).                          of Montgomery County   Sr., Chairman,             Hilo, HI 96720.
                                     (15-04-0687P).         Montgomery County Board
                                                            of Commissioners, 101
                                                            South Lawrence Street,
                                                            Montgomery, AL 36104.
Colorado:
    Arapahoe (FEMA Docket No.: B-   City of Aurora (14-08- The Honorable Steve        City Hall, 15151      May 22, 2015...................       080002
     1505).                          1180P).                Hogan, Mayor, City of      East Alameda
                                                            Aurora, 15151 East         Parkway, Aurora, CO
                                                            Alameda Parkway, Aurora,   80012.
                                                            CO 80012.

    Arapahoe (FEMA Docket No.: B-   City of Centennial     The Honorable Cathy Noon,  Southeast Metro       May 22, 2015...................       080315
     1505).                          (14-08-1180P).         Mayor, City of             Stormwater
                                                            Centennial, 13133 East     Authority, 7437
                                                            Arapahoe Road,             South Fairplay
                                                            Centennial, CO 80112.      Street, Centennial,
                                                                                CO 80112.
    Arapahoe (FEMA Docket No.: B-   Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Nancy Doty,  Arapahoe County       May 22, 2015...................       080011
     1505).                          of Arapahoe County     Chair, Arapahoe County     Public Works
                                     (14-08-1180P).         Board of Commissioners,    Department, 6924
                                                            5334 South Prince          South Lima Street,
                                                            Street, Littleton, CO      Centennial, CO
                                                            80120.                     80112.
    Douglas (FEMA Docket No.: B-    Town of Castle Rock    The Honorable Paul         Utilities             May 1, 2015....................       080050
     1474).                          (14-08-0954P).         Donahue, Mayor, Town of    Department, 175
                                                            Castle Rock, 100 North     Kellogg Court,
                                                            Wilcox Street, Castle      Castle Rock, CO
                                                            Rock, CO 80104.            80109.
    Douglas (FEMA Docket No.: B-    Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Roger        Douglas County        May 1, 2015....................       080049
     1474).                          of Douglas County      Partridge, Chairman,       Public Works
                                     (14-08-0954P).         Douglas County Board of    Department,
                                                            Commissioners, 100 3rd     Engineering
                                                            Street, Castle Rock, CO    Division, 100 3rd
                                                            80104.                     Street, Castle
                                                                                Rock, CO 80104.
    Jefferson (FEMA Docket No.: B-  City of Arvada (14-08- The Honorable Marc         Engineering           May 8, 2015....................       085072
     1474).                          1098P).                Williams, Mayor, City of   Department, 8101
                                                            Arvada, P.O. Box 8101,     Ralston Road,
                                                            Arvada, CO 80001.          Arvada, CO 80001.
Florida:
    Bay (FEMA Docket No.: B-1474).  City of Panama City    The Honorable Gayle        Building Department,  April 23, 2015.................       120013
                                     Beach (14-04-4599P).   Oberst, Mayor, City of     110 South Arnold
                                                            Panama City Beach, 110     Road, Panama City
                                                            South Arnold Road,         Beach, FL 32413.
                                                            Panama City Beach, FL
                                                            32413.
    Bay (FEMA Docket No.: B-1474).  City of Panama City    The Honorable Gayle        Building Department,  April 14, 2015.................       120013
                                     Beach (14-04-8184P).   Oberst, Mayor, City of     110 South Arnold
                                                            Panama City Beach, 110     Road, Panama City
                                                            South Arnold Road,         Beach, FL 32413.
                                                            Panama City Beach, FL
                                                            32413.
    Bay (FEMA Docket No.: B-1474).  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Guy M.       Bay County Planning   April 23, 2015.................       120004
                                     of Bay County (14-04-  Tunnell, Chairman, Bay     and Zoning
                                     4599P).                County Board of            Department, 707
                                                            Commissioners, 840 West    Jenks Avenue, Suite
                                                            11th Street, Panama        B, Panama City, FL
                                                            City, FL 32401.            32401.
    Bay (FEMA Docket No.: B-1474).  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Guy M.       Bay County Planning   May 4, 2015....................       120004
                                     of Bay County (14-04-  Tunnell, Chairman, Bay     and Zoning
                                     AA70P).                County Board of            Department, 707
                                                            Commissioners, 840 West    Jenks Avenue, Suite
                                                            11th Street, Panama        B, Panama City, FL
                                                            City, FL 32401.            32401..
    Bradford (FEMA Docket No.: B-   City of Starke (15-04- The Honorable Travis       City Clerk's Office,  May 15, 2015...................       120017
     1505).                          2615P).                Woods, Mayor, City of      209 North Thompson
                                                            Starke, P.O. Drawer C,     Street, Starke, FL
                                                            Starke, FL 32091.          32091.
    Broward (FEMA Docket No.: B-    Town of Lauderdale-By- The Honorable Scot         City Hall, 4501       May 7, 2015....................       125123
     1474).                          The-Sea (15-04-        Sasser, Mayor, Town of     Ocean Drive,
                                     0738X).                Lauderdale-By-The-Sea,     Lauderdale-By-The-
                                                            4501 Ocean Drive,          Sea, FL 33308.
                                                            Lauderdale-By-The-Sea,
                                                            FL 33308.
    Collier (FEMA Docket No.: B-    City of Marco Island   The Honorable Larry        City Hall, 50 Bald    May 7, 2015....................       120426
     1505).                          (15-04-0522P).         Sacher, Chairman, City     Eagle Drive, Marco
                                                            of Marco Island Council,   Island, FL 34145.
                                                            50 Bald Eagle Drive,
                                                            Marco Island, FL 34145.
    Collier (FEMA Docket No.: B-    Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Tom          Collier County        May 12, 2015...................       120067
     1508).                          of Collier County      Henning, Chairman,         Administrative
                                     (14-04-A504P).         Collier County Board of    Building, 3301 East
                                                            Commissioners, 3299        Tamiami Trail,
                                                            Tamiami Trail East,        Building F, 1st
                                                            Suite 303, Naples, FL      Floor, Naples, FL
                                                            34112.                     34112.
    Columbia (FEMA Docket No.: B-   City of Lake City (13- The Honorable Stephen M.   City Hall, 205 North  April 16, 2015.................       120406
     1474).                          04-6159P).             Witt, Mayor, City of       Marion Avenue, Lake
                                                            Lake City, 205 North       City, FL 32055.
                                                            Marion Avenue, Lake
                                                            City, FL 32055.
    Columbia (FEMA Docket No.: B-   Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Ronald       Columbia County       April 16, 2015.................       120070
     1474).                          of Columbia County     Williams, Chairman,        Building and Zoning
                                     (13-04-6159P).         Columbia County Board of   Department, 173
                                                            Commissioners, P.O. Box    Northeast Hernando
                                                            1529, Lake City, FL        Avenue, Lake City,
                                                            32056.                     FL 32055.
    Lake (FEMA Docket No.: B-1474)  City of Fruitland      The Honorable Chris Bell,  Building Department,  April 30, 2015.................       120387
                                     Park (14-04-A712P).    Mayor, City of Fruitland   506 West Berckman
                                                            Park, 506 West Berckman    Street, Fruitland
                                                            Street, Fruitland Park,    Park, FL 34731.
                                                            FL 34731.
    Lee (FEMA Docket No.: B-1505).  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Brian        Lee County Community  May 12, 2015...................       125124
                                     of Lee County (14-04-  Hamman, Chairman, Lee      Development
                                     8329P).                County Board of            Department, 1500
                                                            Commissioners, P.O. Box    Monroe Street, 2nd
                                                            398, Fort Myers, FL        Floor, Fort Meyers,
                                                            33902.                     FL 33901.
    Monroe (FEMA Docket No.: B-     Village of Islamorada  The Honorable Mike         Village Hall, 87000   May 4, 2015....................       120424
     1505).                          (14-04-A708P).         Forester, Mayor, Village   Overseas Highway,
                                                            of Islamorada, 86800       Islamorada, FL
                                                            Overseas Highway,          33036.
                                                            Islamorada, FL 33036.
    Monroe (FEMA Docket No.: B-     Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Danny        Monroe County         May 7, 2015....................       125129
     1505).                          of Monroe County (14-  Kolhage, Mayor, Monroe     Planning and
                                     04-A180P).             County Board of            Environmental
                                                            Commissioners, 1100        Resources
                                                            Simonton Street, Key       Department, 2798
                                                            West, FL 33040.            Overseas Highway,
                                                                                Marathon, FL 33050.
    Seminole (FEMA Docket No.: B-   City of Longwood (14-  The Honorable John C.      Building and          May 15, 2015...................       120292
     1505).                          04-7277P).             Maingot, Mayor, City of    Planning
                                                            Longwood, 175 West         Department, 174
                                                            Warren Avenue, Longwood,   West Church Avenue,
                                                            FL 32750.                  Longwood, FL 32750.
    Seminole (FEMA Docket No.: B-   Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Bob          Seminole County       May 15, 2015...................       120289
     1505).                          of Seminole County     Dallari, Chairman,         Building Division,
                                     (14-04-7277P).         Seminole County Board of   1101 East 1st
                                                            Commissioners, 1101 East   Street, Sanford, FL
                                                            1st Street, Sanford, FL    32771.
                                                            32771.

    St. Johns (FEMA Docket No.: B-  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Rachael      St. Johns County      May 14, 2015...................       125147
     1505).                          of St. Johns County    Bennett, Chairman, St.     Administrative
                                     (14-04-8520P).         Johns County Board of      Building, 4020
                                                            Commissioners, 500 San     Lewis Speedway, St.
                                                            Sebastian View, St.        Augustine, FL 32084.
                                                            Augustine, FL 32084.
Georgia:
    Cherokee (FEMA Docket No.: B-   Unincorporated areas   The Honorable L.B.         Cherokee County       May 18, 2015...................       130424
     1505).                          of Cherokee County     Ahrens, Chairman,          Administrative
                                     (14-04-8555P).         Cherokee County Board of   Office, 130 East
                                                            Commissioners, 1130        Main Street, Suite
                                                            Bluffs Parkway, Canton,    106, Canton, GA
                                                            GA 30114.                  30114.
    Cobb (FEMA Docket No.: B-1505)  City of Smyrna (14-04- The Honorable Arthur Max   City Engineer's       May 18, 2015...................       130057
                                     9804P).                Bacon, Mayor, City of      Office, 2800 King
                                                            Smyrna, 2800 King          Street, Smyrna, GA
                                                            Street, Smyrna, GA 30080.  30080.
Mississippi: Rankin (FEMA Docket    City of Brandon (14-   The Honorable Butch Lee,   City Hall, 1000       May 12, 2015...................       280143
 No.: B-1505).                       04-8704P).             Mayor, City of Brandon,    Municipal Drive,
                                                            P.O. Box 1539, Brandon,    Brandon, MS 39042.
                                                            MS 39043.
Montana: Butte-Silver Bow (FEMA     Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Cindi Shaw,  Butte-Silver Bow      April 17, 2015.................       300077
 Docket No.: B-1474).                of Butte-Silver Bow    Chair, Butte-Silver Bow    County Floodplain
                                     County (14-08-0867P).  County Council of          Administrator, 115
                                                            Commissioners, 155 West    West Granite
                                                            Granite Street, Butte,     Street, Butte, MT
                                                            MT 59701.                  59701.
North Carolina: Columbus (FEMA      Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Trent        Columbus County       May 5, 2015....................       370305
 Docket No.: B-1508).                of Columbus County     Burroughs, Chairman,       Planning
                                     (14-04-6649P).         Columbus County Board of   Department, 111
                                                            Commissioners, 111         Washington Street,
                                                            Washington Street,         Whiteville, NC
                                                            Whiteville, NC 28472.      28472.
South Carolina:
    Lancaster (FEMA Docket No.: B-  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Larry        Lancaster County      April 23, 2015.................       450120
     1474).                          of Lancaster County    McCullough, Chairman,      Building and Zoning
                                     (14-04-3565P).         Lancaster County           Department, 101
                                                            Council, 101 North Main    North Main Street,
                                                            Street, 2nd Floor,         Lancaster, SC 29721.
                                                            Lancaster, SC 29721.
    Richland (FEMA Docket No.: B-   Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Norman       Richland County       May 18, 2015...................       450170
     1505).                          of Richland County     Jackson, Chairman,         Floodplain
                                     (14-04-5349P).         Richland County Council,   Coordinator, 2020
                                                            P.O. Box 192, Columbia,    Hampton Street, 1st
                                                            SC 29201.                  Floor, Columbia, SC
                                                                                29204.
South Dakota:
    Lincoln (FEMA Docket No.: B-    Town of Harrisburg     The Honorable Julie Burke- City Hall, 203        May 22, 2015...................       460114
     1505).                          (14-08-0638P).         Bowen, Mayor, Town of      Prairie Street,
                                                            Harrisburg, P.O. Box 26,   Harrisburg, SD
                                                            Harrisburg, SD 57032.      57032.
    Lincoln (FEMA Docket No.: B-    Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Dale Long,   Lincoln County Court  May 22, 2015...................       460277
     1505).                          of Lincoln County      Chairman, Lincoln County   House, 105 East 5th
                                     (14-08-0638P).         Board of Commissioners,    Street, Canton, SD
                                                            104 North Main Street,     57013.
                                                            Canton, SD 57013.
Tennessee: Shelby (FEMA Docket      Town of Collierville   The Honorable Stan         Town Hall, 500        May 8, 2015....................       470263
 No.: B-1505).                       (14-04-6821P).         Joyner, Jr., Mayor, Town   Poplar View
                                                            of Collierville, 500       Parkway,
                                                            Poplar View Parkway,       Collierville, TN
                                                            Collierville, TN 38017.    38017.
Utah:
    Davis (FEMA Docket No.: B-      City of Kaysville (14- The Honorable Steve A.     City Hall, 23 East    May 8, 2015....................       490046
     1474).                          08-0854P).             Hiatt, Mayor, City of      Center Street,
                                                            Kaysville, 23 East         Kaysville, UT 84037.
                                                            Center Street,
                                                            Kaysville, UT 84037.
    Salt Lake (FEMA Docket No.: B-  City of Murray (14-08- The Honorable Ted Eyre,    Public Works Office,  April 16, 2015.................       490103
     1474).                          0600P).                Mayor, City of Murray,     4646 South 500
                                                            5025 South State Street,   West, Murray, UT
                                                            2nd Floor, Murray, UT      84123.
                                                            84107.
    Washington (FEMA Docket No.: B- City of St. George     The Honorable Jon Pike,    Engineering           May 14, 2015...................       490177
     1505).                          (14-08-1160P).         Mayor, City of St.         Department, 175
                                                            George, 175 East 200       East 200 North, St.
                                                            North, St. George, UT      George, UT 84770.
                                                            84770.
    Washington (FEMA Docket No.: B- Town of Springdale     The Honorable Stan Smith,  Planning and Zoning   May 22, 2015...................       490179
     1508).                          (14-08-1247P).         Mayor, Town of             Department, 118
                                                            Springdale, 118 Lion       Lion Boulevard,
                                                            Boulevard, Springdale,     Springdale, UT
                                                            UT 84767.                  84767.
    Washington (FEMA Docket No.: B- Unincorporated areas   The Honorable James J.     Washington County     May 14, 2015...................       490224
     1505).                          of Washington County   Eardley, Chairman,         Planning
                                     (14-08-1160P).         Washington County Board    Department, 197
                                                            of Commissioners, 197      East Tabernacle
                                                            East Tabernacle; Street    Street, St. George,
                                                            St. George, UT 84770.      UT 84770.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2015-16551 Filed 7-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 47 (Monday, March 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 13527]
[FR Doc No: 2017-04866]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Extension: Rule 103; SEC File No. 270-410, OMB Control No. 3235-0466]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of the
previously approved collection of information provided for in Rule 103
of Regulation M (17 CFR 242.103), under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
    Rule 103 permits passive market-making in Nasdaq securities during
a distribution. A distribution participant that seeks use of this
exception would be required to disclose to third parties its intention
to engage in passive market making.
    There are approximately 309 respondents per year that require an
aggregate total of 309 hours to comply with this rule. Each respondent
makes an estimated 1 response annually. Each response takes
approximately 1 hour to complete. Thus, the total hourly burden per
year is 309 hours. The total estimated internal labor cost of
compliance for the respondents is approximately $20,085.00 per year,
resulting in an estimated internal labor cost of compliance per
response of approximately $65.00 (i.e., $20,085.00/309 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information
collection at the following Web site: www.reginfo.gov. Comments should
be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503 or by sending an email to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 or by sending an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Comments must be submitted within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: March 8, 2017.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-04866 Filed 3-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34879-34881]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14245]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0591; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-015-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) that applies to certain The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -
700C, -800, and -900 series airplanes. The existing AD currently
requires replacing the drain tube assemblies and support clamps on the
aft fairing of the engine struts. Since we issued that AD, we received
an additional report of a broken drain tube assembly on the aft fairing
of the left engine strut at the clamp support location under the aft
fairing compartment, inside the heat shield cavity of the aft fairing.
There have also been reports of tube wear at the clamp location on
additional airplanes. This proposed AD would require replacing the
drain tube assembly of the left and right engine strut aft fairings
with a new one which includes an integral support clamp made of nickel
alloy 625. This proposed AD would also add airplanes to the
applicability. We are proposing this AD to prevent failure of the drain
tube assemblies and clamps on the aft fairings of the engine struts.
Such failure could allow leaked flammable fluids in the drain systems
to discharge onto the heat shields of the aft fairings of the engine
struts, which could result in an undetected and uncontrollable fire.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 27, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ansel James, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone:
425-917-6497; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0591;
Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-015-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On April 8, 2008, we issued AD 2008-08-24, Amendment 39-15478 (73
FR 21242, April 21, 2008), for certain Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -
800, and -900 series airplanes. That AD requires replacing the drain
tube assemblies and support clamps on the aft fairing of the engine
struts. That AD resulted from reports of failure of the drain tube
assembly and clamp on the aft fairings of an engine strut. We issued
that AD to prevent failure of the drain tube assemblies and clamps on
the aft fairings of the engine struts. Failure of the drain tube
assemblies could allow leaked flammable fluids in the drain systems to
discharge onto the heat shields of the aft fairings of the engine
struts, which could result in an undetected and uncontrollable fire.

Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued

    AD 2008-08-24, Amendment 39-15478 (73 FR 21242, April 21, 2008),
refers to Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-54-1043, dated
May 2, 2007, as the appropriate source of service information for the
required actions.
    Boeing then issued Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-54-1043,
Revision 1, dated October 19, 2009, to replace the drain tube assembly
of the engine strut aft fairing and support clamp.
    Since we issued AD 2008-08-24, Amendment 39-15478 (73 FR 21242,
April 21, 2008), an airplane on which the actions specified in Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-54-1043, Revision 1, dated
October 19, 2009, had been incorporated in production, was reported to
have a broken drain tube assembly on the aft fairing of the left engine
strut at the clamp support location under the aft fairing compartment,
inside the heat shield cavity of the aft fairing (the same location
identified in the existing AD).

This airplane had accumulated 4,127 total flight cycles and 6,845 total
flight hours. There have also been reports of tube wear at the clamp
location.
    Boeing subsequently issued Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-
54-1043, Revision 2, dated November 4, 2011, which describes procedures
for replacing the drain tube assembly of the engine strut aft fairing
with a new one which includes an integral support clamp made of nickel
alloy 625.
    Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-54-1043, Revision 2,
dated November 4, 2011, includes Model 737-900ER series airplanes,
which were not included in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737-54-1043, dated May 2, 2007.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of these same type
designs.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would retain none of the requirements of AD 2008-
08-24, Amendment 39-15478 (73 FR 21242, April 21, 2008). This proposed
AD would add airplanes to the applicability statement of the existing
AD. This proposed AD would also require accomplishing the actions
specified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-54-1043,
Revision 2, dated November 4, 2011, described in this NPRM.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 1,098 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
              Action                        Labor cost            Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement.......................  14 work-hours x $85 per           $12,326          $13,516      $14,840,568
                                     hour = $1,190.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing airworthiness directive
(AD) 2008-08-24, Amendment 39-15478 (73 FR 21242, April 21, 2008), and
adding the following new AD:

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2012-0591; Directorate Identifier
2012-NM-015-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by July 27,
2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD supersedes AD 2008-08-24, Amendment 39-15478 (73 FR
21242, April 21, 2008).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -
700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes; certificated in any
category; as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737-54-1043, Revision 2, dated November 4, 2011.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 54, Nacelles/pylons.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report of a broken drain tube assembly
on the aft fairing of the left engine strut at the clamp support
location under the aft fairing compartment, inside the heat shield
cavity of the aft fairing. There have also been reports of tube wear
at the clamp location on additional airplanes. We are issuing this
AD to prevent failure of the drain tube assemblies and clamps on the
aft fairings of the engine struts. Such failure could allow leaked
flammable fluids in the drain systems to discharge onto the heat
shields of the aft fairings of the engine struts, which could result
in an undetected and uncontrollable fire.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Replacement

    Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD, replace
the drain tube assemblies and support clamps on the aft fairing of
the struts of engines 1 and 2 with new drain tube assemblies and
clamps, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-54-1043, Revision 2, dated
November 4, 2011.

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if

requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance
with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or
local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD 2008-08-24,
Amendment 39-15478 (73 FR 21242, April 21, 2008), are not approved
as AMOCs with this AD.

(i) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Ansel James,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 31, 2012.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-14245 Filed 6-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 217 (Monday, November 9, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71373-71374]
[FR Doc No: 2020-24843]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-146, OMB Control No. 3235-0134]

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F St NE, Washington,
DC 20549-2736

Extension:
    Rule 15c1-7

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing
collection of information provided for in Rule 15c1-7 (17 CFR 240.15c1-
7) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.)
(``Exchange Act''). The Commission plans to submit this existing
collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget
(``OMB'') for extension and approval.
    Rule 15c1-7 states that any act of a broker-dealer designed to
effect securities transactions with or for a customer account over
which the broker-dealer (directly or through an agent or employee) has
discretion will be considered a fraudulent, manipulative, or deceptive
practice under the federal securities laws, unless a record is made of
the transaction immediately by the broker-dealer. The record must
include (a) the name of the customer, (b) the name, amount, and price
of the security, and (c) the date and time when such transaction took
place.
    The Commission estimates that 362 respondents collect information
related to approximately 400,000 transactions annually under Rule 15c1-
7 and that each respondent would spend approximately 5 minutes on the
collection of information for each transaction, for approximately
33,333 aggregate hours per year (approximately 92.1 hours per
respondent).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on

respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    Please direct your written comments to: David Bottom, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o
Cynthia Roscoe, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: November 3, 2020.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-24843 Filed 11-6-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 77 (Tuesday, April 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22571-22573]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09104]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2010-0027]

Hours of Service of Drivers: Application for Renewal of Exemption

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of final disposition; grant of application for exemption
renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to grant RockTenn's request for a
renewal of its exemption from the hours-of-service (HOS) regulation
that prohibits drivers from operating property-carrying commercial
motor vehicles (CMVs) after the 14th hour after coming on duty. FMCSA
renews this limited exemption for RockTenn's shipping department
employees and

occasional substitute commercial driver's license (CDL) holders who
transport paper mill products short distances between its shipping and
receiving locations on a public road. The exemption is restricted to a
specific 275 foot route in Chattanooga, Tennessee. This exemption will
allow these individuals to occasionally work up to 16 consecutive hours
and be allowed to return to work with less than the mandatory 10
consecutive hours off duty.

DATES: This exemption is effective from April 17, 2014 (12:01 a.m.),
through April 16, 2016 (11:59 p.m.).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Pearlie Robinson, FMCSA Driver and
Carrier Operations Division, Office of Carrier, Driver and Vehicle
Safety Standards, Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e), FMCSA may grant an exemption
from many of the safety regulations, including the HOS requirements in
49 CFR part 395, for a two-year period if it finds ``such exemption
would likely achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to, or
greater than, the level of safety that would be achieved absent such
exemption'' (49 CFR 381.305(a)).

Request for Exemption

    Under 49 CFR 395.3(a)(2), a property-carrying CMV driver is
prohibited from operating a CMV on a public road after the end of the
14th hour after coming on duty following 10 or more consecutive hours
off duty.
    The initial RockTenn exemption application for relief from the HOS
rule was submitted in 2009; a copy of the application is in the docket.
That application fully described the nature of shipping operations
encountered by CMV drivers employed by RockTenn. On April 17, 2012, the
Agency granted RockTenn's current exemption from the HOS regulation
that prohibits drivers from operating property-carrying commercial
motor vehicles (CMVs) after the 14th hour after coming on duty. That
exemption expires on April 16, 2014.
    RockTenn operates a paper mill located in Chattanooga, Tennessee,
its principal place of business. Its shipping and receiving departments
are on opposite sides of the paper mill, requiring driver-employees to
travel on a public road to shuttle trailers as needed. These drivers
utilize a public road--Compress Street--an average of forty times per
day to travel between RockTenn's manufacturing facility, and shipping
and receiving docks. These drivers do not transport any material
farther than the paper mill lots and/or Compress Street. The distance
traveled on Compress Street is approximately 275 feet in one direction,
and one tractor is used to perform this work.
    RockTenn's shipping department currently works 12-hour shifts for 4
days, and then allows employees 4 days off duty. The schedule is
subject to change. Usually there are two shipping department employees
on each shift. One employee drives a fork-lift truck loading trailers
with finished goods, and the other operates the tractor shuttling
trailers. These employees do not drive a CMV continuously during their
shift(s).
    At times, RockTenn may operate on three 8-hour shifts with
employees working a double (16-hour) shift when ``rotating back.''
According to RockTenn, the problem arises because of the double-shift,
and also on occasion when a shipping department driver does not report
for work as scheduled. On a Monday, for example, if an individual
worked the weekend, his or her shift would normally have to ``hurry
back'' within 8 hours. As a result of the mandatory 10 hours off-duty
requirement for drivers, without the exemption RockTenn would be
required to schedule these drivers' shifts to start later than other
employees. This would create at least 2 hours when the company cannot
load or transport trailers with finished goods due to the absence of
the drivers. Furthermore, as a result of the 14-hour driving window,
they would ``work short'' without the exemption, creating on-time
delivery issues for other employees, who are allowed to work an entire
``double shift'' (16 hours) when necessary.
    RockTenn requested a limited exemption from 49 CFR part 395 for its
shipping department CMV drivers, as well as others with a valid CDL who
on occasion must substitute, allowing all such drivers to drive as late
as the 16th hour since coming on duty and return to work with a minimum
of at least 8 hours off duty. If exempt from the normal HOS
requirements, these employees could follow the same work schedule as
other RockTenn employees on their shift, and would be able to work for
the full 16 hours of a ``double shift.'' RockTenn could therefore
minimize the chances of delayed shipments that might occur if their
drivers were not allowed to work the same schedule as other employees.
    RockTenn acknowledged in its application that these drivers would
still be subject to all of the other FMCSRs, including possessing a
CDL, random drug testing, medical certification, and other driver-
qualification requirements.
    A copy of RockTenn's application for exemption renewal is available
for review in the docket for this notice.

Comments

    On January 29, 2014 (79 FR 4802), FMCSA published notice of this
application, and asked for public comment. The Agency received one
comment. The commenter recommended that the exemption not be granted
but did not provide a substantive basis for the recommendation.

FMCSA Decision

    The FMCSA has evaluated RockTenn's application for exemption and
the public comment. The Agency believes that RockTenn's overall safety
performance as reflected in its ``satisfactory'' safety rating, as well
as a number of other factors discussed below, will likely enable it to
achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
level of safety achieved without the exemption (49 CFR 381.305(a)).
    This exemption is being renewed under extremely narrow conditions.
The exemption is restricted to CDL holders employed by RockTenn who are
exclusively assigned to a specific route. This route is entirely on one
street (Compress Street), between the shipping and receiving
departments--approximately 275 feet in one direction. The CMVs operated
by RockTenn's shipping department shuttle drivers will be exposed to
travel on a public road for only very brief periods of time. Although
two crashes were reported for two drivers of RockTenn's locations in
Alabama and Kentucky RockTenn has experienced no crashes or other
safety issues as a result of CMV operations conducted under its current
exemption, which has been in effect since April 17, 2012.
    The exemption enables RockTenn's shipping department employees and
occasional substitute CDL holders who transport paper mill products
between the shipping and receiving locations to work up to 16
consecutive hours in a duty period and return to work with a minimum of
at least 8 hours off duty when necessary. This is comparable to current
HOS regulations that allow certain ``short-haul'' drivers a 16-hour
driving ``window'' once a week and other non-CDL short-haul drivers two
16-hour duty periods per week, provided specified conditions are met.
Furthermore, 49 CFR 381.305(a) specifies that motor carriers ``. . .
may

apply for an exemption if one or more FMCSR prevents you from
implementing more efficient or effective operations that would maintain
a level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level achieved
without the exemption.''

Terms of the Exemption

Period of the Exemption

    The exemption from the requirements of 49 CFR 395.3(a)(2) (the
``14-hour rule'') is granted for the period from 12:01 a.m. on April
17, 2014, through 11:59 p.m. on April 16, 2016, for drivers employed by
RockTenn operating CMVs on Compress Street in Chattanooga, Tennessee,
between the company's shipping and receiving departments.

Extent of the Exemption

    These drivers must comply will all other applicable provisions of
the FMCSRs.

Preemption

    In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315(d), during the period this
exemption is in effect, no State shall enforce any law or regulation
that conflicts with or is inconsistent with this exemption with respect
to a firm or person operating under the exemption.

Notification to FMCSA

    RockTenn must notify FMCSA within 5 business days of any accident
(as defined in 49 CFR 390.5), involving any of the motor carrier's CMVs
operating under the terms of this exemption. The notification must
include the following information:
    a. Date of the accident,
    b. City or town, and State, in which the accident occurred, or
closest to the accident scene,
    c. Drivers name and license number,
    d. Vehicle number and state license number,
    e. Number of individuals suffering physical injury,
    f. Number of fatalities,
    g. The police-reported cause of the accident,
    h. Whether the driver was cited for violation of any traffic laws,
motor carrier safety regulations, and
    i. The total driving time and total on-duty time period prior to
the accident. Reports filed under this provision shall be emailed to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Termination

    FMCSA does not believe the drivers covered by this exemption will
experience any deterioration of their safety record. However, should
this occur, FMCSA will take all steps necessary to protect the public
interest, including revocation of the exemption. The FMCSA will
immediately revoke the exemption for failure to comply with its terms
and conditions.

    Issued on: April 14, 2014.
William Bronrott,
 Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-09104 Filed 4-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P