[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 5, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45049-45051]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19191]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0831]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; SFODA 9233 Buffalo Operation; Lake Erie, Hamburg, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
navigable waters within a 500-foot radius of the water insertion site
located offshore of Hamburg Beach/Town Park, Lake Erie, Hamburg, NY.
This safety zone is intended to restrict vessels from portions of Lake
Erie during the SFODA 9233 Buffalo Operation. This temporary safety
zone is necessary to protect mariners and vessels from the navigational
hazards associated with

this event. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo.

DATES: This rule is effective from 6:00 a.m. until 11:30 p.m. on
September 5, 2018.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2018-0831 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LTJG Sean Dolan, Chief Waterways Management Division,
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule due to it being impracticable and contrary to
public interest. The final details of this event were not known to the
Coast Guard until there was insufficient time remaining before the
event to publish a NPRM.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date would
be contrary to the rule's objectives of enhancing safety of life on the
navigable waters and protection of persons and vessels in vicinity of
the SFODA 9233 Buffalo Operation.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The Captain of the Port Buffalo (COTP) has determined that
helicopter training with swimmers jumping to the water presents
significant risks to the public safety and property. Such hazards
include excessive winds from helicopter, rougher than normal waters,
dangerous projectiles, and falling debris. This rule is needed to
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable
waters within the safety zone while the SFODA 9233 Buffalo Operation
takes place.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone on September 5, 2018, from 6:00
a.m. until 11:30 p.m. The safety zone will encompass all waters of Lake
Erie, Hamburg, NY contained within a 500-foot radius of:
42[deg]46'07.8'' N, 78[deg]52'29.8'' W.
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his
designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or his
designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the conclusion
that this rule is not a significant regulatory action. We anticipate
that it will have minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere
with other agencies, will not adversely alter the budget of any grant
or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel legal or policy
issues. The safety zone created by this rule will be relatively small
and enforced for a relatively short time. Also, the safety zone has
been designed to allow vessels to transit around it. Thus, restrictions
on vessel movement within that particular area are expected to be
minimal. Under certain conditions, moreover, vessels may still transit
through the safety zone when permitted by the Captain of the Port.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A. above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule
establishes a safety zone. It is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0831 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T09-0831  Safety Zone; SFODA 9233 Buffalo Operation; Lake
Erie, Hamburg, NY.

    (a) Location. The safety zone will encompass all waters of Lake
Erie; Hamburg, NY contained within a 500-foot radius of:
42[deg]46'07.8'' N, 78[deg]52'29.8'' W.
    (b) Enforcement period. This regulation will be enforced from 6:00
a.m. until 11:30 p.m. on September 5, 2018.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port
Buffalo is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act on his
behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of
the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene representative.

    Dated: August 30, 2018.
Kenneth E. Blair,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2018-19191 Filed 9-4-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13294-13295]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04971]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-1977-N-0015 (Formerly 77N-0187); DESI 7663]

Drugs for Human Use; Drug Efficacy Study Implementation;
Potassium Aminobenzoate Oral Preparations; Withdrawal of Hearing
Request; Withdrawal of New Drug Application; Final Resolution of Drug
Efficacy Study Implementation

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
that all outstanding hearing requests regarding POTABA (potassium
aminobenzoate) Tablets, Capsules, Powder, and Envules under Docket No.
FDA-1977-N-0015 (formerly 77N-0187) (this Drug Efficacy Study
Implementation (DESI) 7663) have been withdrawn. Therefore, as proposed
in the notice of opportunity for hearing (NOOH), FDA finds that the
products subject to the application identified in this docket, or any
identical, related, or similar (IRS) products, have not been shown to
be effective for use under the conditions of use prescribed,
recommended, or suggested in the labeling, and hereby withdraws
approval of the application under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act).

DATES: This notice is applicable April 8, 2022.

ADDRESSES: For access to the docket to read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER> between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday. Publicly available submissions may be seen in
the docket.
    The most relevant background documents regarding this matter are
available in the docket. However, additional background documents are
available upon request (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Astrid Lopez-Goldberg, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 5185, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-3485, email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In 1962, Congress amended the FD&C Act to require that new drugs be
proven effective for their labeled indications, as well as safe, in
order to obtain FDA approval (Drug Amendments of 1962 (Pub. L. 87-
781)). These amendments also required FDA to conduct a retrospective
evaluation of the effectiveness of the drug products that FDA had
approved as safe between 1938 and 1962. FDA contracted with the
National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council (NAS/NRC) to
make an initial evaluation of the effectiveness of over 3,400 products
that had been approved only for safety between 1938 and 1962. The NAS/
NRC reports for these drug products were submitted to FDA in the late
1960s and early 1970s. The Agency reviewed and reevaluated the reports
and published its findings in Federal Register notices. FDA's
administrative implementation of the NAS/NRC reports was called the
DESI. DESI covered the approximately 3,400 products specifically
reviewed by the NAS/NRC, as well as the even larger number of IRS
products that entered the market without FDA approval. If FDA's final
DESI determination classifies a drug product as lacking substantial
evidence of effectiveness for one or more indications, that drug
product and those IRS to it may no longer be marketed for such
indications and are subject to enforcement action as unapproved new
drugs.

II. Final Resolution of Hearing Request Regarding Potassium
Aminobenzoate Oral Preparations Under Docket No. FDA-1977-N-0015
(Formerly 77N-0187); DESI 7663

    In a Federal Register notice published on August 28, 1970 (35 FR
13755), FDA announced its evaluation of a report received from the NAS/
NRC under DESI 7663 regarding POTABA (potassium aminobenzoate) Tablets,
Capsules, Powder, and Envules, New Drug Application (NDA) 007663, held
by Glenwood LLC (formerly known as Glenwood Laboratories, Inc.), 83
Summit St., Tenafly, NJ 07670 (herein after ``Glenwood''). The notice
stated that the drug products were possibly effective in the treatment
of scleroderma, dermatomyositis, morphea, linear scleroderma,
pemphigus, and Peyronie's Disease and lacked substantial evidence of
effectiveness for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, sarcoidosis,
and pulmonary fibrosis. Glenwood, and any other person marketing such
drug products without approval, was given 60 days to revise its
labeling to delete those indications for which substantial evidence of
effectiveness was lacking and 6 months to submit data to provide
substantial evidence of effectiveness for the indications for which the
drug was regarded as possibly effective. The notice stated that, at the
end of the 6-month period, FDA would evaluate the data to determine
whether substantial evidence of effectiveness had been provided, and,
if it had not, FDA would initiate the withdrawal of approval of NDA
007663 under section 505(e) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355(e)).
    Glenwood did not submit data to provide substantial evidence of
effectiveness for the indications for which the drug was regarded as
possibly effective within the period provided by the 1970 Federal
Register notice, and the Agency issued a NOOH on the proposed
withdrawal of approval of NDA 007663 in the Federal Register of
February 4, 1972 (37 FR 2688).
    In response to a court order, FDA published a notice in the Federal
Register on December 14, 1972 (37 FR 26623), which stated that POTABA,
among other drugs, could remain on the market pending completion of
further scientific studies.
    In a Federal Register notice published on August 19, 1977 (42 FR
41922), the Agency revoked the exemption granted in the December 14,
1972, notice pursuant to which POTABA had remained on the market
pending its continued study. In a separate NOOH for DESI 7663, also
published in the Federal Register of August 19, 1977 (42 FR 41921), FDA
noted that Glenwood did not submit data providing substantial evidence
of effectiveness and that no other person had submitted data or
protocols or expressed an intention to perform clinical studies on
potassium aminobenzoate. This notice reclassified the possibly
effective indications to lacking substantial evidence of effectiveness
and proposed to issue an order under section 505(e) of the FD&C Act
withdrawing approval of Glenwood's NDA and all amendments

and supplements thereto on the grounds that new information, evaluated
together with the evidence available when the application was approved,
showed there is a lack of substantial evidence that the drug is
effective under the conditions of use prescribed, recommended, or
suggested in the labeling. The Agency again invited Glenwood, and any
other interested person(s) who would be adversely affected by the
withdrawal of approval of NDA 007663, to submit: (1) On or before
September 19, 1977, a written notice of appearance and request for
hearing and (2) on or before October 17, 1977, the data, information,
and analyses relied upon to justify a hearing.
    On September 12, 1977, Glenwood filed a written notice of
appearance and requested a hearing, and on October 17, 1977, Glenwood
submitted data in support of its hearing request. Along with these
submissions, Glenwood requested that the Agency delay action on the
hearing request until the firm had conducted another placebo-controlled
study. Subsequently, Glenwood initiated a clinical trial at the
Downstate Medical Center of the State University of New York and
supplemented its hearing request with additional data, including a
progress report on the clinical trial of POTABA conducted at the
Downstate Medical Center.
    Following a meeting between Glenwood and FDA on November 18, 1985,
Glenwood sponsored another controlled clinical trial, and the final
study report was submitted on February 4, 1993.
    By letter dated October 21, 2010, FDA asked Glenwood whether it
wanted to pursue its pending hearing request regarding POTABA. By
letter dated November 11, 2010, Glenwood affirmed its hearing request.
    By letter dated June 8, 2020, FDA again asked Glenwood whether it
wanted to pursue its pending hearing request regarding POTABA. By
letter dated July 2, 2020, Cheplapharm Arzneimittel GmbH, successor-in-
interest to Glenwood LLC, stated that it did not wish to pursue the
hearing request for POTABA.

III. Conclusions and Order

    There are no outstanding hearing requests regarding potassium
aminobenzoate oral preparations under Docket No. FDA-1977-N-0015, DESI
7663. Therefore, as proposed in the NOOH, FDA withdraws approval of NDA
007663 under section 505(e) of the FD&C Act.
    Shipment in interstate commerce of any drug product identified in
this docket under DESI 7663, or any IRS product, that is not the
subject of an approved NDA or abbreviated new drug application is
unlawful as of the effective date of this notice (see DATES). Any
person who wishes to determine whether this notice covers a specific
product should write to Astrid Lopez-Goldberg at the Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). Firms
should be aware that, after the applicable date of this notice (see
DATES), FDA intends to take enforcement action without further notice
against any firm that manufactures or ships in interstate commerce any
unapproved product covered by this notice.

IV. Discontinued Products

    Firms must notify the Agency of certain product discontinuations in
writing under section 506C(a) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 356c). See
http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/DrugShortages/ucm142398.htm. Some
firms may have previously discontinued manufacturing or distributing
products covered by this notice without discontinuing the listing as
required under section 510(j) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(j)). Other
firms may discontinue manufacturing or distributing listed products in
response to this notice. All firms are required to electronically
update the listing of their products under 510(j) of the FD&C Act to
reflect discontinuation of unapproved products covered by this notice
(21 CFR 207.57(b)). Questions on electronic drug listing updates should
be sent to [email protected]. In addition to the required update, firms
can also notify the Agency of product discontinuation by sending a
letter, signed by the firm's chief executive officer and fully
identifying the discontinued product(s), including the product National
Drug Code number(s), and stating that the manufacturing and/or
distribution of the product(s) have been discontinued. The letter
should be sent electronically to Astrid Lopez-Goldberg (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). FDA plans to rely on its existing records,
including its drug listing records, the results of any future
inspections, or other available information, when it identifies
violative products for enforcement action.

    Dated: March 3, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-04971 Filed 3-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 39 (Wednesday, February 27, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6400-6401]
[FR Doc No: 2019-03401]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC16-77-001.
    Applicants: BlackRock, Inc.
    Description: Request for Reauthorization and Extension of Blanket
Authorizations Under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act, et al. of
BlackRock, Inc.
    Filed Date: 2/19/19.
    Accession Number: 20190219-5254.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/19.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:
    Docket Numbers: EG19-59-000.
    Applicants: Broadlands Wind Farm LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Broadlands Wind Farm LLC.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5138.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: EG19-60-000.
    Applicants: Hidalgo Wind Farm II LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Hidalgo Wind Farm II LLC.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5139.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: EG19-61-000.
    Applicants: Lexington Chenoa Wind Farm LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Lexington Chenoa Wind Farm LLC.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5140.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER09-1256-005; ER12-2708-007.
    Applicants: Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline, LLC, PATH
West Virginia Transmission Company, LLC, PATH Allegheny Transmission
Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing of Potomac-Appalachian Transmission
Highline, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 2/19/19.
    Accession Number: 20190219-5245.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/21/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1743-003.
    Applicants: Doswell Limited Partnership.
    Description: Compliance filing: Reactive Service Rate Schedule
Compliance Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5184.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-952-001.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Raven Solar Amendment to Amendment
Filing to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5002.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-987-000.
    Applicants: Crystal Lake Wind Energy I, LLC.
    Description: Supplement to February 5, 2019 Crystal Lake Wind
Energy I, LLC tariff filing.
    Filed Date: 2/15/19.
    Accession Number: 20190215-5182.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1080-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-02-20 EIM
Implementation Agreement with NorthWestern to be effective 4/22/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5003.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1081-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: UFA Sunshine Valley Solar,
SCE CAISO, SA No. 230 & Cancel Letter Agmt SA No. 191 to be effective
2/21/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5004.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1082-000.
    Applicants: NorthWestern Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SA 299 7th Rev--NITSA with
REC Advanced Silicon Materials, LLC to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5005.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1083-000.
    Applicants: CPV Shore, LLC.
    Description: Request for Waiver of CPV Shore, LLC.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5119.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1084-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-02-21_SA 3248 OTP NSP
Brooking Substation Relay MPFCA (J493 J510) to be effective 2/7/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5146.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1085-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-02-21_SA 3227
Certificate of Concurrence Duke--AEP IMTC IA to be effective 12/12/
2018.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5149.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1086-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Mississippi, LLC, Entergy Louisiana, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: ELL-EML-Southern
Transmission Interconnection Agreement to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5169.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1087-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of ISA/SA
No. 4408, Queue No. Z1-038 to be effective 1/21/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5189.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1088-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-02-21_SA 3249 Poweshiek
Reasnor 161 kV MPFCA (J498 J499 J500) to be effective 2/8/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5194.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1089-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-02-21_SA 3250 NSP-Deuel
Harvest Wind Energy FCA (J526) to be effective 2/8/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5222.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1090-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-02-21_SA 3251 NSP-
Louise Solar Project FCA (J523) to be effective 2/8/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5230.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1091-000.
    Applicants: NextEra Energy Transmission MidAtlantic, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Notice of Succession to be
effective 1/22/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5238.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1092-000.
    Applicants: Antelope DSR 3, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Master Interconnection
Services Agreement to be effective 2/22/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5244.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1093-000.
    Applicants: San Pablo Raceway, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Master Interconnection
Services Agreement to be effective 2/22/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5250.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1094-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Entergy Interconnection
Agreement Filing to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5253.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1095-000.
    Applicants: Georgia Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Entergy Interconnection
Agreement Filing to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5255.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1096-000.
    Applicants: Mississippi Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Entergy Interconnection
Agreement Filing to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 2/21/19.
    Accession Number: 20190221-5256.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/14/19.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 21, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-03401 Filed 2-26-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 24 (Tuesday, February 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8128-8129]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02495]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9776-3]

Request for Nominations of Experts to the EPA Office of Research
and Development's Board of Scientific Counselors

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is seeking
nominations for technical experts to serve on its Board of Scientific
Counselors (BOSC), a federal advisory committee to the Office of
Research and Development (ORD). Submission of nominations is preferred
via the BOSC Web site at: http://www.epa.gov/osp/bosc/nomination.htm.

DATES: Nominations should be submitted by April 1, 2013, per
instructions below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any member of the public needing
additional information regarding this Notice and Request for
Nominations may contact Mr. Greg Susanke, Office of Science Policy,
Office of Research and Development, Mail Code 8104-R, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460;
via phone/voice mail at:<PHONE_NUMBER>; via fax at:<PHONE_NUMBER>; or
via email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>General information concerning the
BOSC can be found at the following Web site: http://www.epa.gov/osp/bosc.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The BOSC is a chartered Federal Advisory Committee that was
established by the EPA to provide independent scientific and technical
peer review, advice, consultation, and recommendations about ORD. As a
Federal Advisory Committee, the BOSC conducts business in accordance
with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (5 U.S.C. App. 2) and
related regulations.
    The BOSC is comprised of an Executive Committee and six supporting
subcommittees currently being formed. Each of these subcommittees will
focus on one of ORD's research programs: Air, Climate, and Energy
Research Program; Chemical Safety for Sustainability Research Program;
Homeland Security Research Program; Human Health Risk Assessment
Research Program; Safe and Sustainable Water Resources Research
Program; and Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program.
Please visit http://www.epa.gov/ord/research-programs.htm to learn more
about these programs.
    Members of the BOSC are recognized experts in various scientific,
engineering, and social science fields. EPA will consider nominees from
academia, industry, business, public and private research institutes or
organizations, government (federal, state, local, and tribal) and non-
government organizations, and other relevant interest areas. Members
are appointed by the EPA Administrator for a period of three years and
serve as special government employees. EPA values and welcomes
diversity. In an effort to obtain nominations of diverse candidates,
EPA encourages nominations of women and men of all racial and ethnic
groups.

Expertise Sought

    EPA's BOSC Staff Office is seeking nominations of nationally and
internationally recognized scientists and engineers having experience
and expertise in one or more of the following areas:

 Atmospheric Science
    --aerosol chemistry
    --aerosol physical science
    --air quality modeling
    --atmospheric chemistry
    --atmospheric physics
 Biology
    --biogeochemistry
    --cell biology
    --endocrinology (endocrine disruptors)
    --microbiology/molecular biology
    --pharmacokinetics
    --systems biology
 Chemistry
    --analytical chemistry
    --combustion chemistry
    --environmental chemistry
    --green chemistry
    --physical chemistry
    --water chemistry
 Climate Change/Global Change
    --adaption
    --modeling
    --variability
    --greenhouse gas technology assessment
 Ecology
    --aquatic ecology (freshwater, wetland)
    --ecosystem services
    --hydrology/hydraulics (watershed modeling)
    --plant/forestry ecology
    --water resources
    --soil biogeochemistry
    --system ecology
    --landscape ecology
    --urban ecology
 Engineering
    --biochemical engineering
    --bioenvironmental engineering
    --civil engineering (drinking water treatment and distribution,
stormwater treatment, wastewater treatment, storm-, and wastewater
infrastructure)
    --chemical engineering
    --combustion engineering
    --environmental engineering (decontamination, clean-up, management)
    --industrial engineering
    --mechanical engineering
 Information Science
    --information technology
    --information visualization
    --research communication
    --spatial analysis
    --uncertainty analysis
 Nanotechnology
 Public Health
    --children's health
    --community health
    --environmental health
    --epidemiology/molecular epidemiology
    --exposure science (assessment, predictive)
 Risk Assessment (cumulative risk assessment, mixtures risk
assessment, ecological risk assessment, human health risk assessment)
 Sustainability
    --community/urban level planning and sustainability
    --industrial (industrial ecology, life cycle analysis, technology
policy,

systems engineering)
    --energy
    --energy and water relationship
 Toxicology
    --computational toxicology (computational biology, genomics,
proteomics, metabonomics, computational chemistry, high-throughput
bioassays, informatics, bioinformatics, predictive toxicology)
    --ecotoxicology
    --developmental/reproductive toxicology
    --immunotoxicology
    --molecular toxicology
    --neurotoxicology
    --pulmonary/cardiovascular toxicology
    --carcinogenesis
 Science Policy/Public Policy
    --science policy
    --public policy
    --environmental justice
    --science program evaluation
 Social Science
    --community disaster recovery and resiliency
    --economics (ecological economics, environmental economics, natural
resource economics, human health economics)
    --socioeconomics
    --sociology
 Behavioral Science
    --psychology
    --ecopsychology
    --environmental psychology
    --conservation psychology
    --social neuroscience
    --risk perception
    --risk/crisis communication
    --community decision making
 Decision Science
    --decision analysis
    --value of information
    --decision support system

Process and Deadline for Submitting Nominations

    Any interested person or organization may nominate themselves or
qualified individuals in the areas of expertise described above.
Nominations should be submitted via the BOSC Web site (which is
preferred over hard copy) at: http://www.epa.gov/osp/bosc/nomination.htm. Nominations should be submitted in time to arrive no
later than April 1, 2013. To receive full consideration, nominations
should include all of the information requested. EPA's BOSC Staff
Office requests: Contact information about the person making the
nomination; contact information about the nominee; the disciplinary and
specific areas of expertise of the nominee; subcommittee preference;
the nominee's curriculum vita and/or resume; and additional information
that would be useful for considering the nomination such as background
and qualifications (e.g., current position, educational background,
expertise, research areas), experience relevant to one or more of ORD's
research programs, service on other advisory committees and
professional societies, and availability to participate as a member of
the committee/subcommittee. Persons having questions about the
nomination procedures, or who are unable to submit nominations through
the BOSC Web site, should contact Mr. Greg Susanke, as indicated above
in this notice.

Selection Criteria

    The BOSC is a balanced and diverse expert committee. The committee
and each of its subcommittees possess necessary domains of expertise,
depth and breadth of knowledge, and diverse and balanced scientific
perspectives. Nominations will be evaluated on the basis of several
criteria including: (a) Scientific and/or technical expertise,
knowledge, and experience; (b) availability to serve and willingness to
commit time to the committee (approximately one to three meetings per
year including both face-to-face meetings and teleconferences); (c)
absence of financial conflicts of interest; (d) absence of an
appearance of a lack of impartiality; (e) skills working on committees
and advisory panels; and (f) background and experiences that would
contribute to the diversity of viewpoints on the committee/
subcommittees, e.g., workforce sector, geographical location, social,
cultural, and educational backgrounds, and professional affiliations.
    The BOSC Staff Office's evaluation of an absence of financial
conflicts of interest will include a review of the ``Confidential
Financial Disclosure Form for Special Government Employees Serving on
Federal Advisory Committees at the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency'' (EPA Form 3110-48). This confidential form allows Government
Officials to determine whether there is a statutory conflict between
that person's public responsibilities (which includes membership on an
EPA Federal Advisory Committee) and private interests and activities,
or the appearance of a lack of impartiality, as defined by Federal
regulation. The form may be viewed and downloaded from the following
URL address, http://www.epa.gov/osp/bosc/pdf/EPA_3110-48.pdf.

    Dated: January 29, 2013.
Fred S. Hauchman,
Director, Office of Science Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-02495 Filed 2-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 83 (Monday, May 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23434-23435]
[FR Doc No: 2021-09206]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2011-0185]

Vehicle-Mounted Elevating and Rotation Work Platforms (Aerial
Lifts) Standard; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget's
(OMB) Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public comments concerning the proposal to
extend the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) approval of the
information collection requirements specified in the Vehicle-Mounted
Elevating and Rotation Work Platforms (Aerial Lifts) Standard.

DATES: Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by
July 2, 2021.

ADDRESSES:
    Electronically: You may submit comments, including attachments,
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, the Federal e-Rulemaking
Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting comments.
    Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov. Documents in the docket are
listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index; however, some
information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly available to
read or download through the website. All submissions, including
copyrighted material, are available for inspection through the OSHA
Docket Office. Contact the OSHA Docket Office for assistance in
locating docket submissions.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and the
OSHA docket number for this Federal Register notice (OSHA-2011-0185).
OSHA will place comments and requests to speak, including personal
information, in the public docket, which may be available online.
Therefore, OSHA cautions interested parties about submitting personal
information such as Social Security numbers and birthdates. For further
information on submitting comments, see the ``Public Participation''
heading in the section of this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Seleda Perryman or Theda Kenney,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Department of Labor, as part of the continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing collection of
information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program ensures that information is in the
desired format, reporting burden (time and costs) is minimal,
collection instruments are clearly understood, and OSHA's estimate of
the information collection burden is accurate. The Occupational Safety
and Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.) authorizes
information collection by employers as necessary or appropriate for
enforcement of the Act or for developing information regarding the
causes and prevention of occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act also requires that OSHA obtain
such information with minimum burden upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to reduce to the maximum extent
feasible unnecessary duplication of efforts in obtaining information
(29 U.S.C. 657).
    Manufacturer's Certification of Modifications (Sec.
1910.67(b)(2)). The Standard requires that when aerial lifts are
``field modified'' for uses other than those intended by the
manufacturer, the manufacturer or other equivalent entity, such as a
nationally recognized testing laboratory, must certify in writing that
the modification is in conformity with all applicable provisions of
ANSI A92.2-1969 and the OSHA standard and that the modified aerial lift
is at least as safe as the equipment was before modification. Employers
are to maintain the certification record and make it available to OSHA
compliance officers upon request. This record provides assurance to
employers, workers, and compliance officers that the modified aerial
lift is safe for use, thereby preventing failure while workers are
being elevated. The certification record also provides the most
efficient means for the compliance officers to determine that an
employer is complying with the Standard.

II. Special Issues for Comment

    OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues:

     Whether the proposed information collection requirements
are necessary for the proper performance of the agency's functions,
including whether the information is useful;
     The accuracy of OSHA's estimate of the burden (time and
costs) of the information collection requirements, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
     The quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and
     Ways to minimize the burden on employers who must comply;
for example, by using automated or other technological information
collection and transmission techniques.

III. Proposed Actions

    There are no program changes associated with this package. However,
there was a slight burden hour decrease because of the methodology the
agency uses to calculate burden hours. The agency uses fractions so
that the public can better follow our calculations.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Vehicle-Mounted Elevating and Rotation Work Platforms
(Aerial Lifts) Standard (29 CFR part 1910.67).
    OMB Control Number: 1218-0230.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profits.
    Number of Respondents: 1,000.
    Frequency of Responses: On occasion.
    Total Responses: 1,000.
    Average Time per Response: Various.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 17.
    Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance): $0.

IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments on This Notice and
Internet Access to Comments and Submissions

    You may submit comments in response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal; (2) by facsimile (fax); or (3) by hard copy. Please
note: While OSHA's Docket Office is continuing to accept and process
submissions by regular mail, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Docket
Office is closed to the public and not able to receive submissions to
the docket by hand, express mail, messenger, and courier service. All
comments, attachments, and other material must identify the agency name
and the OSHA docket number for the ICR (Docket No. OSHA-2011-0085). You
may supplement electronic submissions by uploading document files
electronically. If you wish to mail additional materials in reference
to an electronic or facsimile submission, you must submit them to the
OSHA Docket Office (see the section of this notice titled ADDRESSES).
The additional materials must clearly identify electronic comments by
your name, date, and the docket number so that the agency can attach
them to your comments.
    Due to security procedures, the use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of comments.
    Comments and submissions are posted without change at http://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about
submitting personal information such as social security numbers and
date of birth. Although all submissions are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index, some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to read or download from this
website. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are available
for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. Information on
using the http://www.regulations.gov website to submit comments and
access the docket is available at the website's ``User Tips'' link.
Contact the OSHA Docket Office at<PHONE_NUMBER>, (TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>)
for information about materials not available from the website, and for
assistance in using the internet to locate docket submissions.

V. Authority and Signature

    James S. Fredrick, Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this
notice. The authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012
(77 FR 3912).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on April 23, 2021.
James S. Frederick,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2021-09206 Filed 4-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11321-11322]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04373]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[USCG-2014-0024]

Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Newtown Creek, Dutch Kills,
English Kills and Their Tributaries, New York City, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the
Greenpoint Avenue Bridge, across Newtown Creek, mile 1.3, at New York
City, New York. The deviation is necessary to facilitate bridge
painting operations at the bridge. This temporary deviation authorizes
the Greenpoint Avenue Bridge to remain in the closed position for up to
six consecutive days followed by four consecutive days of full
operation at various times during the effective period of this
deviation.

DATES: This deviation is effective from May 1, 2014 through September
30, 2014.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this deviation, [USCG-2014-0024] is available
at http://www.regulations.gov. Type the docket number in the ``SEARCH''
box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12-140, on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary deviation, call or email Ms. Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer,
First Coast Guard District<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or (212) 668-
7165. If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Cheryl Collins,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Greenpoint Avenue Bridge, across Newtown
Creek, mile 1.3, at New York City, New York, has a vertical clearance
in the closed position of 26 feet at mean high water and 31 feet at
mean low water. The existing drawbridge operation regulations are
listed at 33 CFR 117.801(g).
    The waterway is transited by commercial and seasonal recreational
vessels of various sizes.
    The bridge owner, New York City Department of Transportation,
requested approval to allow the Greenpoint Avenue Bridge to remain in
the closed position for up to six consecutive days followed by four
days of full operation to facilitate bridge sandblasting and painting
operations. The bridge painting closures can only be implemented
between May and September in order to minimize impacts to commercial
barge

traffic carrying home heating oil upstream. The Coast Guard contacted
all known commercial waterway users regarding this deviation and no
objections were received.
    Under this temporary deviation the draw of the Greenpoint Avenue
Bridge may remain in the closed position at various times during this
deviation for up to six consecutive days followed by four days of full
bridge operation.
    Each six day closure will be announced two weeks in advance in the
Local Notice to Mariners (LNTM) along with a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners (BNTM) to help facilitate marine transportation system
planning.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the bridge must return to its
regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the designated
time period. This deviation from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: February 11, 2014.
C.J. Bisignano,
Supervisory Bridge Management Specialist, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014-04373 Filed 2-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 203 (Monday, October 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62358-62359]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24519]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3697-000, ER11-3697-005.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Correction to August 26, 2013 Offer of Settlement of
Southern California Edison Company.
    Filed Date: 10/9/13.
    Accession Number: 20131009-5160.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-67-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: 1148R16 American Electric Power NITSA and NOAs to be
effective 10/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 10/9/13.
    Accession Number: 20131009-5140.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/30/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-68-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Petition for Approval of Disposition of Proceeds of
Penalty Assessments of the California Independent System Operator
Corporation.
    Filed Date: 10/9/13.
    Accession Number: 20131009-5161.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/30/13.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 10, 2013.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-24519 Filed 10-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


  HYPERLINK "http://www.ebio.org/?id=5"  Production capacity installed

  HYPERLINK "http://www.ebio.org/?id=4"  Production data

  HYPERLINK "http://www.ebio.org/?id=6"  Production capacity under construction

in mln litres

MS	Company	PC	Feedstock

Austria	Agrana (Pischelsdorf)	240	Wheat, maize

Belgium	AlcoBioFuel (Gent)	150	Wheat

	Amylum (Aalst)	32	Wheat

Bulgaria	Euro Ethyl GmbH (Silistra)	10	Maize

Czech Republic	Agroetanol TTD (Dobrovice)	65	Sugar juice

Finland	St1 (Lappeenranta)	1.5	Organic

	St1(Närpiö)	1.5	Organic

	St1 (Hamina)	44	Hydrous alcohol

France	Tereos (Artenay)	40	Sugar juice

	Tereos (Provins)	30	Sugar juice

	Tereos (Morains)	40	Sugar juice

	Tereos (Lillers)	80	Sugar juice

	Tereos (Lillebonne)	250	Wheat

	Tereos (Origny)	300	Sugar juice

	Cristanol (Arcis sur Aube)	100	Sugar juice

	Cristanol I (Bazancourt)	150	Sugar beet, sugar juice

	Cristanol/Deulep (St. Gilles)	40	Wine alcohol

	Saint Louis Sucre	90	Sugar juice

	CropEnergies AG (Dunkerque)	100	Hydrous alcohol

	AB Bioenergy France (Lacq)	30	Wine alcohol, maize

	Roquette (Beinheim)	75	Wheat

Germany	Verbio AG (Zörbig)	100	Cereals

	Verbio AG (Schwedt)	230	Cereals, sugar juice

	CropEnergies AG (Zeitz)	360	Cereals, sugar juice

	Fuel 21 (Klein Wanzleben)	130	Sugar juice

	Danisco (Anklam)	53	Sugar juice

	KWST (Hannover)	40	Wine alcohol

	SASOL (Herne)	76	Hydrous alcohol

Hungary	Hungrana Kft. (Szabadegyháza)	170	Maize

	Györ Distillery	40	Maize

Italy	Silcompa (Correggio)	60	Hydrous alcohol

	Alcoplus (Ferrara)	42	Cereals

	IMA (Bertolino Group)	200	Wine alcohol

Latvia	Jaunpagastas (Riga)	12

	Lithuania	Biofuture	31	Rye, Wheat

Netherlands	Royal Nedalco (Bergen op Zoom)	35	C-Starch

Poland	Akwawit (Lezno)	100	Cereals)

	Cargill (Wroclaw)	36	C-Starch

Romania	Amochim 	18

	Spain	Ecocarburantes (Cartagena)	150	Barley, wheat

	Bioetanol Galicia (Teixeiro)	176	Cereals

	Biocarburantes C&L (Babilafuente)	195	Cereals

	Acciona (Alcázar de San Juan)	32	Wine alcohol

Sweden	Agroetanol	55	Cereals

	SEKAB	90	Wine alcohol

	SEKAB	10	Pulp

UK	British Sugar plc (Downham)	70	Sugar juice

Total

4380

	Updated: 080901

Website: http://www.ebio.org/statistics.php?id=5

  HYPERLINK "http://www.ebio.org/?id=5"  Production capacity installed

  HYPERLINK "http://www.ebio.org/?id=4"  Production data

  HYPERLINK "http://www.ebio.org/?id=6"  Production capacity under construction

in mln litres

MS	Company	PC	Feedstock

Belgium	BioWanze - CropEnergies (Wanze)	300	Sugar and cereals

Bulgaria	Euro Ethyl GmbH (Silistra)	30	Maize

	Crystal Chemicals	13

	Czech Republic	PLP (Trmice)	100	Cereals (possibly sugar as well)

	Korfil a.s. (Vrdy)	100	Cereals

	Ethanol Energy (Vrdy)	70	Cereals, maize

Denmark	Dong Energy (Kalundborg)	17.6	Straw, wheat

France	AB Bioenergy France (Lacq)	190	Maize, wine alcohol

	Cristanol II (Bazancourt)	200	Wheat, glucose

	Roquette (Beinheim)	35	Wheat

Germany	Wabio Bioenergie (Bad Köstritz)	8.4	Waste

	Bioethanol Emsland (Papenburg)	90

PROKON Nord (Stade)	120	Wheat

Greece	Helenic Sugar EBZ	150	Sugar beet, molasses, cereals

Hungary	First Hungarian Bioethanol Kft (Elsö Magyar Bioethanol Termelökst)	90	Maize

Italy	Grandi Molini (Porto Marghera)	130	Cereals

Lithuania	Bioetan	100	Cereals

Netherlands	Abengoa (Rotterdam)	480	Wheat

	Nivoba BV (Wijster)	100	Cereals

Slovakia	Enviral	138	Corn

Slovenia	Slovnafta (Bratislava)	75	Wheat

Spain	Biocarburantes Castilla & Leon (Salamanca)	5	Ligno-cellulose

	SNIACE II (Zamora)	150	Wheat

	Alcoholes Biocarburantes de Extremadura (Albiex)	110

	Sweden	Agroetanol	155	Cereals

UK	Ensus plc (Teesside)	400	Wheat

	Vivergo (Hull)	420	Wheat

Total

3777

	Updated: 20080901

Website: http://www.ebio.org/statistics.php?id=6