[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21231-21232]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08672]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

    The following notice of meeting is published pursuant to section
3(a) of the government in the Sunshine Act (Pub. L. 94-409), 5 U.S.C.
552b:

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

DATE AND TIME: April 17, 2014, 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 2C, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Agenda.
    * NOTE--Items listed on the agenda may be deleted without further
notice.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For a recorded message listing items struck from or added to the
meeting, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    This is a list of matters to be considered by the Commission. It
does not include a listing of all documents relevant to the items on
the agenda. All public documents, however, may be viewed on line at the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link,
or may be examined in the Commission's Public Reference Room.

                                        1004th--Meeting, Regular Meeting
                                          [April 17, 2014, 10:00 a.m.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Item No.                          Docket No.                                  Company
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Administrative
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-1.........................  AD02-1-000............................  Agency Business Matters.
A-2.........................  AD02-7-000............................  Customer Matters, Reliability, Security
                                                                       and Market Operations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Electric
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E-1.........................  ER13-64-001...........................  PacifiCorp.
                              ER13-65-001...........................  Deseret Generation & Transmission
                                                                       Cooperative, Inc.
                              ER13-67-001...........................  NorthWestern Corporation.
                              ER13-68-001...........................  Portland General Electric Company.
                              ER13-127-002..........................  Idaho Power Company.
E-2.........................  ER14-1331-000.........................  Southern California Edison Company.
E-3.........................  ER14-1332-000.........................  DATC Path 15, LLC.
                              EL14-33-000...........................
E-4.........................  ER14-354-000..........................  Florida Power & Light Company.
E-5.........................  ER14-381-000..........................  PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
E-6.........................  ER13-2233-001.........................  Midcontinent Independent System Operator,
                                                                       Inc.
E-7.........................  ER13-1292-001.........................  Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
E-8.........................  ER10-1138-001.........................  NorthWestern Corporation.
                              ER12-316-000..........................
E-9.........................  OMITTED...............................
E-10........................  EL14-14-000...........................  California Wind Energy Association and
                                                                       First Solar, Inc. v. California
                                                                       Independent System Operator Corporation
                                                                       and Southern California Edison Company.
E-11........................  EL14-13-000...........................  Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation
                                                                       v. Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Hydro
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
H-1.........................  P-2232-522............................  Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC.
H-2.........................  P-18-095..............................  Idaho Power Company.
H-3.........................  P-2210-240............................  Appalachian Power Company.
H-4.........................  P-516-480.............................  South Carolina Electric and Gas Company.
H-5.........................  P-12693-004...........................  Sutton Hydroelectric Company LLC.
H-6.........................  P-14493-001...........................  KC Pittsfield LLC.
H-7.........................  CD14-15-001...........................  ECOsponsible, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  Certificates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C-1.........................  CP12-491-001..........................  Trunkline Gas Company, LLC.
C-2.........................  CP13-523-000..........................  Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company,
                                                                       LLC.
C-3.........................  CP14-32-000...........................  Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued: April 10, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.

    A free webcast of this event is available through www.ferc.gov.
Anyone with Internet access who desires to view this event can do so by
navigating to www.ferc.gov's Calendar of Events and locating this event
in the Calendar. The event will contain a link to its webcast. The
Capitol Connection provides technical support for the free webcasts. It
also offers access to this event via television in the DC area and via
phone bridge for a fee. If you have any questions, visit
www.CapitolConnection.org or contact Danelle Springer or David
Reininger at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Immediately following the conclusion of the Commission Meeting, a
press briefing will be held in the Commission Meeting Room. Members of
the public may view this briefing in the designated overflow room. This
statement is intended to notify the public that the press briefings
that follow Commission meetings may now be viewed remotely at
Commission headquarters, but will not be telecast through the Capitol
Connection service.

[FR Doc. 2014-08672 Filed 4-11-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: May 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 90)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 25984-25986]
[DOCID:fr08my08-7]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0118; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-289-AD;
Amendment 39-15502; AD 2008-09-21]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Model Mystere-Falcon 50
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued following the
discovery of a risk of chafing between an electrical feeder bundle
and a bus bar under the circuit breaker panel. Most of the time,
this possible chafing would be dormant and would lead to an
uneventful loss of segregation within the different electrical
system components. However, missing segregation combined with
additional electrical failures may impair flight safety.
* * * * *

Chafing between an electrical feeder bundle and a bus bar under the
circuit breaker panel could lead to electrical arcing, which could
result in smoke and fire in the cockpit. We are issuing this AD to
require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective June 12, 2008.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of June 12,
2008.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on February 5, 2008 (73
FR 6620). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued following the
discovery of a risk of chafing between an electrical feeder bundle
and a bus bar under the circuit breaker panel. Most of the time,
this possible chafing would be dormant and would lead to an
uneventful loss of segregation within the different electrical
system components. However, missing segregation combined with
additional electrical failures may impair flight safety.
    This AD mandates inspection of the electrical feeder bundle, and
modification of its routing under the circuit breaker panel through
implementation of modification M3093.

Chafing between an electrical feeder bundle and a bus bar under the
circuit breaker panel could lead to electrical arcing, which could
result in smoke and fire in the cockpit.
    The corrective action includes repairing or replacing damaged
wiring; re-routing the feeder cables above the wiring of the ``Avionic
Master'' and ``Aux Bat'' relays; installing a protective sheath on the
feeder cables; adding spacers to separate the bus bar wiring assemblies
from the feeder cables; and adding Teflon protection on the feeder
cables and securing the feeder cables with wiring retaining strips. You
may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ

substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect about 76 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take about 12 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average
labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $0 per
product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that
are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the
U.S. operators to be $72,960, or $960 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2008-09-21 Dassault Aviation: Amendment 39-15502. Docket No. FAA-
2008-0118; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-289-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective June 12,
2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Dassault Model Mystere-Falcon 50
airplanes, certificated in any category, serial number (S/N) 251 and
S/N 253 and subsequent, without modification M3093 implemented.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24:
Electrical power.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued following the
discovery of a risk of chafing between an electrical feeder bundle
and a bus bar under the circuit breaker panel. Most of the time,
this possible chafing would be dormant and would lead to an
uneventful loss of segregation within the different electrical
system components. However, missing segregation combined with
additional electrical failures may impair flight safety.
    This AD mandates inspection of the electrical feeder bundle, and
modification of its routing under the circuit breaker panel through
implementation of modification M3093.

Chafing between an electrical feeder bundle and a bus bar under the
circuit breaker panel could lead to electrical arcing, which could
result in smoke and fire in the cockpit. The corrective action
includes repairing or replacing damaged wiring; re-routing the
feeder cables above the wiring of the ``Avionic Master'' and ``Aux
Bat'' relays; installing a protective sheath on the feeder cables;
adding spacers to separate the bus bar wiring assemblies from the
feeder cables; and adding Teflon protection on the feeder cables and
securing the feeder cables with wiring retaining strips.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done: Within 13 months after the effective
date of this AD, inspect for damage of the electrical feeder bundle;
repair or replace wiring, as applicable; and modify its routing as
detailed in the accomplishment instructions paragraph of Dassault
Service Bulletin F50-483, dated June 6, 2007, including Erratum
dated July 2007.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority

(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Airworthiness Directive 2007-0175, dated June 28, 2007; and Dassault
Service Bulletin F50-483, dated June 6, 2007, including Erratum
dated July 2007; for related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (i) You must use Dassault Service Bulletin F50-483, dated June
6, 2007, including Erratum dated July 2007, to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, New Jersey
07606.
    (3) You may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>,
or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-
locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 23, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager,Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
 [FR Doc. E8-9895 Filed 5-7-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 217 (Tuesday, November 10, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 69625-69627]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28533]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0561; Directorate Identifier 2014-NE-12-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce plc Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede airworthiness directive (AD) 2015-04-
03 that applies to certain Rolls-Royce plc (RR) RB211 Trent 768-60,
772-60, and 772B-60 turbofan engines. AD 2015-04-03 requires inspection
of the sealing sleeve on the high-pressure/intermediate-pressure (HP/
IP) turbine support internal oil feed tube and removal of those sealing
sleeves affected by AD 2015-04-03. This proposed AD would require
removal of either the affected sealing sleeve only or both the affected
sealing sleeve and the oil feed tube. We are proposing this AD to
prevent failure of the HP/IP turbine support internal oil feed tube,
which could lead to uncontained engine failure and damage to the
airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 11,
2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Rolls-Royce plc, Corporate Communications, P.O. Box 31, Derby, DE24
8BJ, United Kingdom; phone: 011-44-1332-242424; fax: 011-44-1332-
249936; email: http://www.rolls-royce.com/contact/civil_team.jsp;
Internet: https://customers.rolls-royce.com/public/rollsroycecare. You
may view this service information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 781-
238-7125.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0561; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the mandatory continuing airworthiness
information, regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The address for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Haberlen, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2014-0561;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NE-12-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On February 11, 2015, we issued AD 2015-04-03, Amendment 39-18105
(80

FR 9380, February 23, 2015), for certain RR RB211 Trent 768-60, 772-60,
and 772B-60 turbofan engines. AD 2015-04-03 requires inspection of the
sealing sleeve on the HP/IP turbine support internal oil feed tube and
removal of those sealing sleeves affected by AD 2015-04-03. AD 2015-04-
03 resulted from fractures of the HP/IP turbine support internal oil
feed tube. We issued AD 2015-04-03 to prevent failure of the HP/IP
turbine support internal oil feed tube, which could result in
uncontained engine failure and damage to the airplane.

Actions Since AD 2015-04-03 Was Issued

    Since we issued AD 2015-04-03, Amendment 39-18105 (80 FR 9380,
February 23, 2015), we received a report of high oil consumption on an
engine that did not have an affected sealing sleeve. The manufacturer's
investigation revealed that certain oil feed tube threaded end adapters
were manufactured with the outer diameter larger than the drawing
maximum, which can cause binding of the sliding joint and ultimately
lead to low-cycle fatigue failure of the HP/IP turbine support internal
oil feed tube. Also since we issued AD 2015-04-03, the European
Aviation Safety Agency has issued AD 2015-0105R1, dated August 18,
2015, which requires inspection of the affected sealing sleeve and
removal of the affected sealing sleeve or removal of both the affected
sealing sleeve and oil feed tube.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    RR has issued RR Alert Non-Modification Service Bulletin (NMSB) No.
RB.211-72-AJ035, Revision 2, dated August 10, 2015 and RR Service
Bulletin (SB) No. RB.211-72-H754, dated October 1, 2014. The Alert NMSB
No. RB.211-72-AJ035, Revision 2, dated August 10, 2015, provides
guidance on identification of the sealing sleeve, part number (P/N)
FW15003, and replacement of the non-conforming sealing sleeve, P/N
FW15003, with a conforming sealing sleeve, P/N FW15003. The SB No.
RB.211-72-H754, dated October 1, 2014, provides information on the
replacement of the sealing sleeve, P/N FW15003, and oil feed tube, P/N
FW14193, with a sealing sleeve, P/N KH28323 and oil feed tube, P/N
KH28324. This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section of this
NPRM.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require removal of the affected sealing
sleeve only or both the affected sealing sleeve and the oil feed tube.
Both corrective actions eliminate the unsafe condition caused by
affected sealing sleeves and/or affected oil feed tube threaded end
adapters.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 58 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would take about
1.2 hours per engine to comply with this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per hour. Required parts cost approximately $5,850 per
engine. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $345,216.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2015-04-03, Amendment 39-18105 (80 FR 9380, February 23, 2015) (``AD
2015-04-03''), and adding the following new AD:

Rolls-Royce plc: Docket No. FAA-2014-0561; Directorate Identifier
2014-NE-12-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by January 11, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD supersedes AD 2015-04-03.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Rolls-Royce plc (RR) RB211 Trent 768-60, 772-
60, and 772B-60 turbofan engines, all serial numbers, except those
engines:
    (1) That have had Modification 72-H754 applied in production, or
    (2) that have been modified in accordance with RR Service
Bulletin (SB) No. RB.211-72-H754, dated October 1, 2014, or
    (3) with sealing sleeve, part number (P/N) FW15003, with
markings 102013, 112013, or 102013L.

(d) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by fractures of the high-pressure/
intermediate pressure (HP/IP) turbine support internal oil feed
tube. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the HP/IP turbine
support internal oil feed tube, which could result in uncontained
engine failure and damage to the airplane.

(e) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
    (1) If sealing sleeve, P/N FW15003, is installed without
markings 102013, 112013, or 102013L, or if the markings cannot be
sufficiently identified, then within 1,600 flight cycles or 24
months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first:
    (i) Remove the affected sealing sleeve, P/N FW15003, and replace
it with a sealing sleeve eligible for installation. Use paragraph
3.A.(4)(b) of RR Alert Non-Modification Service Bulletin (NMSB) No.
RB.211-72-AJ035, Revision 2, dated August 10, 2015, to perform the
part replacement, or,
    (ii) Remove the affected sealing sleeve, P/N FW15003, and the
oil feed tube, P/N FW14193, and replace with parts eligible for
installation. Use paragraph 3.B. or 3.C., as appropriate, of RR SB
No. RB.211-72-H754, dated October 1, 2014, to perform the parts
replacement.
    (2) Reserved.

 (f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, may approve AMOCs
to this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request. You may email your request to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(g) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Philip Haberlen,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency AD 2015-
0105R1, dated, August 18, 2015, for more information. You may
examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0561.
    (3) RR Alert NMSB No. RB.211-72-AJ035, Revision 2, dated August
10, 2015 and RR SB No. RB.211-72-H754, dated October 1, 2014, can be
obtained from RR, using the contact information in paragraph (g)(4)
of this AD.
    (4) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Rolls-Royce plc, Corporate Communications, P.O. Box 31, Derby, DE24
8BJ, United Kingdom; phone: 011-44-1332-242424; fax: 011-44-1332-
249936; email: http://www.rolls-royce.com/contact/civil_team.jsp;
Internet: https://customers.rolls-royce.com/public/rollsroycecare.
    (5) You may view this service information at the FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on November 2, 2015.
Colleen M. D'Alessandro,
Directorate Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-28533 Filed 11-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Dear Mr. Zeller:

I am writing as an individual consumer to request an extension of the comment period for the Food and Drug

Administration's ("FDA") Proposed Rule Deeming Tobacco Products to be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and

Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking and Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the "Proposed Rule")

published at 79 Fed. Reg. 23,142 and Federal Register No. 2014-09491. On behalf of myself, I am requesting that

the comment period for the Proposed Rule be extended by the FDA for an additional 105 days, from its current 75-

day period, to 180 days.

The Proposed Rule raises a number of significant issues and questions that are important and relevant to me, as a

consumer of products that are proposed for regulation under the Proposed Rule. The Proposed Rule asks about a

hundred different questions I might want to respond to. I want to provide my thoughts and comments on many of

these issues, but my time to devote to researching and providing thoughtful comments on these important questions

is limited. I have already spent many hours researching and dissecting these issues, but they take time. I know

that the FDA took many years to even come up with the Proposed Rule, so I do not think it is at all unreasonable

to allow the public a mere six months to comment on it. This is our only opportunity, as consumers, to provide our

feedback.

I feel very strongly about e-cigarettes as an alternative to combustible cigarettes. Quite simply, I firmly

believe that they saved my life. I wish to provide you with my personal story, as well as science- and evidence-

based responses to your questions so that you can take my comment into account.

 I was a two pack a day smoker for 35 years. I was diagnosed with COPD two and a half years ago. My coughing was

so bad that I almost wrecked my motorcyle on the way to work. I switched completely to elctronic cigerttes about

seven monthes ago (OCt, 2013). During a routine chech up with my doctor, he said that I am no longer exhibiting

signs of COPD and stopped the prescription that I was on.

 I realize that the FDA has the authority under 21 CFR 10.40 to extend this time frame and that the FDA has

exercised this authority on numerous occasions in the past. I would therefore ask that you do so here, so that all

stakeholders have the opportunity to provide their comments on this proposed regulation.

I appreciate your consideration of my request and am happy to discuss this issue with you further.


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 40 (Thursday, February 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13657-13658]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04655]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IC13-12-000]

Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-577); Comment
Request; Extension

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of information collection and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or
FERC) is soliciting public comment on the currently approved
information collection, FERC-577, Natural Gas Facilities: Environmental
Review and Compliance (formerly Gas Pipeline Certificates:
Environmental Impact Statement). The FERC is proposing to change the
title of the report to more accurately reflect the nature of the
information being collected.

DATES: Comments on the collection of information are due April 29,
2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments (identified by Docket No. IC13-12-
000) by either of the following methods:
     eFiling at Commission's Web Site: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp.
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Instructions: All submissions must be formatted and filed in
accordance with submission guidelines at: http://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide.asp. For user assistance contact FERC Online Support
by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by phone at:<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll-free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> for TTY.
    Docket: Users interested in receiving automatic notification of
activity in this docket or in viewing/downloading comments and
issuances in this docket may do so at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/docs-filing.asp.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Brown may be reached by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, and fax at (202)
273-0873.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Natural Gas Facilities: Environmental Review and Compliance.
    OMB Control No.: 1902-0128.
    Type of Request: Three-year extension of the FERC-577 information
collection requirements with no changes to the current reporting
requirements.
    Abstract: Section 102(2)(c) of the of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) \1\ requires that all Federal agencies must
include in every recommendation or report on proposals for legislation
and other major federal actions significantly affecting the quality of
the human environment, a detailed statement on: the environmental
impact on the proposed actions; any adverse environmental effects which
cannot be avoided should the proposal be implemented; alternatives to
the proposed action; the relationship between local short-term uses of
man's environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long term
productivity; and any irreversible and irretrievable commitment of
resources which would be involved in the proposed action should it be
implemented.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Public Law 91-190.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission's regulations implementing NEPA in 18 CFR part 380
require applicants seeking authorization for the construction and
abandonment of facilities to provide a detailed environmental report
with their application that describes the impact the project is likely
to have and the measures the applicant will implement to mitigate those
impacts. This environmental report normally consists of at least twelve
separate reports, each addressing a particular resource area.
    Type of Respondents: The respondents include all jurisdictional
natural gas companies seeking authorization from the Commission to
construct or abandon facilities.
    Estimate of Annual Burden: \2\ The Commission estimates the total
Public Reporting Burden for this information collection as:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The Commission defines burden as the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain,
retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal
agency. For further explanation of what is included in the
information collection burden, reference 5 Code of Federal
Regulations 1320.3.

                                          FERC-577--Natural Gas Facilities: Environmental Review and Compliance
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of                      Average  burden
                         Type of respondent                             Number of      responses per   Total number of     hours  per    Estimated total
                                                                       respondents       respondent       responses         response      annual burden
                                                                                (A)              (B)    (A) x (B) = (C)            (D)                (C) x (D)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Natural Gas Companies..............................................              92               16            1,472              193          284,096
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The total estimated annual cost burden to respondents is
$19,886,720 [284,096 hours * $70/hour \3\ = $19,886,720].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Average salary (per hour) plus benefits per full-time
equivalent employee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comments: Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden and
cost of the collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information collection; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.

    Dated: February 21, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-04655 Filed 2-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P