D. Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments Executive Order 13175, entitled `` Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' ( 65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure `` meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.'' The proposed rule does not have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175. No tribal governments own or operate metal can surface coating operations. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to the proposed rule.

E. Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use The proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211 ( 66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 ( UMRA), Pub. L. 104   4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions on State, local,

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 04 Jan 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 15JAP2. SGM 15JAP2 2128 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules and tribal governments and the private sector. Under Section 202 of the UMRA, EPA generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with `` Federal mandates'' that may result in expenditures to State, local, and tribal governments, in aggregate, or to the private sector, of $ 100 million or more in any 1 year. Before promulgating an EPA rule for which a written statement is needed, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires EPA to identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt the least costly, most costeffective or least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule. The provisions of section 205 do not apply when they are inconsistent with applicable law. Moreover, section 205 allows EPA to adopt an alternative other than the least costly, most cost effective, or least burdensome alternative if the Administrator publishes with the final rule an explanation why that alternative was not adopted. Before EPA establishes any regulatory requirements that may significantly or uniquely affect small governments, including tribal governments, it must have developed under section 203 of the UMRA a small government agency plan. The plan must provide for notifying potentially affected small governments, enabling officials of affected small governments to have meaningful and timely input in the development of EPA regulatory proposals with significant Federal intergovernmental mandates, and informing, educating, and advising small governments on compliance with the regulatory requirements. The EPA has determined that the proposed rule does not contain a Federal mandate that may result in expenditures of $ 100 million or more for State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or the private sector in any 1 year. The maximum total annualized cost of the proposed rule for any year has been estimated to be less than $ 56.2 million. Thus, today's proposed rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA. In addition, the EPA has determined that the proposed rule contains no regulatory requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments because it contains no requirements that apply to such governments or impose obligations upon them. Therefore, today's proposed rule is not subject to the requirements of section 203 of UMRA. G. Regulatory Flexibility Act ( RFA), as Amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 ( SBREFA), 5 U. S. C. 601, et seq.

The RFA generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any other statute unless the EPA certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small business, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. For purposes of assessing the impacts of today's proposed rule on small entities, small entity is defined as: ( 1) A small business according to the Small Business Administration ( SBA) size standards by NAICS code; ( 2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county, town, school district or special district with a population of less than 50,000; and ( 3) a small organization that is any not forprofit enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field. In accordance with the RFA, EPA conducted an assessment of the proposed standards on small businesses within the metal can industry. Based on SBA NAICS based size definitions and reported sales and employment data, EPA identified 13 small business, or 43.3 percent of the metal can companies. Small businesses are expected to incur only 2 percent of the total industry annualized compliance costs of $ 56.2 million. The EPA estimates that 10 of the 13 small businesses will experience an impact less than 1 percent of total company sales, two small firms will experience impacts between 1 and 3 percent, and one firm will experience an impact of more than 3 percent of sales. Consequently, one of the 15 facilities owned by small businesses is likely to prematurely close as a result of the proposed rule. For more information, consult the EIA report entitled `` Economic Impact Analysis for the Proposed Metal Can NESHAP'' in Docket A   98   41. After considering the economic impact of today's proposed rule on small entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

H. Paperwork Reduction Act The information collection requirements in the proposed rule have been submitted for approval to OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U. S. C. 3501, et seq. An Information Collection Request ( ICR) document has been prepared by EPA ( ICR No. 2079   01) and a copy may be obtained from Susan Auby by mail at the U. S. EPA, Collection Strategies Division ( 2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, by email at auby. susan@ epa. gov, or by calling ( 202) 566   1672. A copy may also be downloaded off the internet at http:// www. epa. gov/ icr. The information requirements are based on notification, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements in the NESHAP General Provisions ( 40 CFR part 63, subpart A) which are mandatory for all operators subject to national emission standards. Those recordkeeping and reporting requirements are specifically authorized by section 114 of the CAA ( 42 U. S. C. 7414). All information submitted to the EPA pursuant to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements for which a claim of confidentiality is made is safeguarded according to EPA policies set forth in 40 CFR part 2, subpart B. The proposed standards would require maintaining records of all coating and thinning materials data and calculations used to determine compliance. That information includes the amount ( kg) used during each 12 month compliance period, mass fraction organic HAP, and, for coating materials only, mass fraction of solids. If an add on control device is used, records must be kept of the capture efficiency of the capture system, destruction or removal efficiency of the add on control device, and the monitored operating parameters. In addition, records must be kept of each calculation of the affected sourcewide emissions for each monthly and rolling 12 month compliance period and all data, calculations, test results, and other supporting information used to determine this value. The recordkeeping requirements are only for the specific information needed to determine compliance. The annual monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping burden for this collection ( averaged over the first 3 years after the effective date of the promulgated rule) is estimated to be approximately 1,815 labor hours per year at a total annual cost of $ 545,000. That estimate includes a one time performance test and report ( with repeat tests where needed); onetime submission of a SSMP with semiannual reports for any event when the procedures in the plan were not followed; semiannual compliance status reports; and recordkeeping. There are no VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 04 Jan 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 15JAP2. SGM 15JAP2 2129 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules capital/ startup costs associated with the monitoring requirements. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. That includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's rules are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. Comments are requested on the EPA's need for the information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques. By U. S. Postal Service, send comments on the ICR to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U. S. EPA ( 2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460; or by courier, send comments on the ICR to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U. S. EPA ( 2822T), 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 6143, Washington, DC 20460 (( 202) 566   1700)), marked `` Attention: Desk Officer for EPA.'' Include the ICR number in any correspondence. Since OMB is required to make a decision concerning the ICR between 30 and 60 days after January 15, 2003, a comment to OMB is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it by February 14, 2003. The final rule will respond to any OMB or public comments on the information collection requirements contained in the proposal.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act Section 12( d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 ( NTTAA), Public Law 104   113, § 12( d) ( 15 U. S. C. 272 note) directs EPA to use VCS in their regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. The VCS are technical standards ( e. g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by VCS bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides not to use available and applicable VCS. This proposed rulemaking involves technical standards. The EPA cites the following standards in this rule: EPA Methods 1, 1A, 2, 2A, 2C, 2D, 2F, 2G, 3, 3A, 3B, 4, 24, 25, 25A, 204, 204A through F, and 311. Consistent with the NTTAA, EPA conducted searches to identify VCS in addition to these EPA methods/ performance specifications. No applicable VCS were identified for EPA Methods 1A, 2A, 2D, 2F, 2G, 204, 204A through 204F, and 311. The search and review results have been documented and are placed in the docket ( A   98   41) for the proposed rule. Three VCS described below were identified as acceptable alternatives to EPA test methods for the purposes of the proposed rule. The VCS ASME PTC 19   10   1981   Part 10, `` Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses,'' is cited in the proposed rule for its manual method for measuring the oxygen, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide content of exhaust gas. That part of ASME PTC 19   10   1981   Part 10 is an acceptable alternative to Method 3B. The two VCS, ASTM D2697   86 ( Reapproved 1998), `` Standard Test Method for Volume Nonvolatile Matter in Clear or Pigmented Coatings'' and ASTM D6093   97, `` Standard Test Method for Percent Volume Nonvolatile Matter in Clear or Pigmented Coatings Using a Helium Gas Pycnometer,'' are cited in the proposed rule as acceptable alternatives to EPA Method 24 to determine the volume fraction of coating solids. Currently, EPA Method 24 does not have a procedure for determining the volume of solids in coatings. Those standards augment the procedures in Method 24, which currently states that volume solids content be calculated from the coating manufacturer's formulation. Six VCS: ASTM D1475   90, ASTM D2369   95, ASTM D3792   91, ASTM D4017   96a, ASTM D4457   85 ( Reapproved 91), and ASTM D5403   93 are already incorporated by reference ( IBR) in EPA Method 24. Five VCS: ASTM D1979   91, ASTM D3432 89, ASTM D4747   87, ASTM D4827   93, and ASTM PS9   94 are IBR in EPA Method 311. In addition to the VCS EPA uses in the proposed rule, the search for emissions measurement procedures identified 14 other VCS. The EPA determined that 11 of those 14 standards identified for measuring emissions of the HAP or surrogates subject to emission standards in the proposed rule were impractical alternatives to EPA test methods for the purposes of the proposed rule. Therefore, EPA does not intend to adopt those standards for that purpose. The reasons for the determination for the 11 methods are discussed below. The VCS ASTM D3154   00, `` Standard Method for Average Velocity in a Duct ( Pitot Tube Method),'' is impractical as an alternative to EPA Methods 1, 2, 2C, 3, 3B, and 4 for the purposes of the proposed rulemaking since the standard appears to lack in quality control and quality assurance requirements. Specifically, ASTM D3154   00 does not include the following: ( 1) Proof that openings of standard pitot tube have not plugged during the test, ( 2) if differential pressure gauges other than inclined manometers ( e. g., magnehelic gauges) are used, their calibration must be checked after each test series, and ( 3) the frequency and validity range for calibration of the temperature sensors. The VCS ASTM D3464   96 ( 2001), `` Standard Test Method Average Velocity in a Duct Using a Thermal Anemometer,'' is impractical as an alternative to EPA Method 2 for the purposes of the proposed rulemaking primarily because applicability specifications are not clearly defined, e. g., range of gas composition, temperature limits. Also, the lack of supporting quality assurance data for the calibration procedures and specifications, and certain variability issues that are not adequately addressed by the standard limit EPA's ability to make a definitive comparison of the method in those areas. The VCS ISO 10780: 1994, `` Stationary Source Emissions Measurement of Velocity and Volume Flowrate of Gas Streams in Ducts,'' is impractical as an alternative to EPA Method 2 in the proposed rulemaking. The standard recommends the use of an L shaped pitot which historically has not been recommended by EPA. The EPA specifies the S type design which has large openings that are less likely to plug up with dust. The VCS, CAN/ CSA Z223.2   M86( 1986), `` Method for the Continuous Measurement of Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Monoxide, Sulphur Dioxide, and Oxides of Nitrogen in Enclosed Combustion Flue Gas Streams,'' is unacceptable as a substitute for EPA Method 3A since it does not include quantitative specifications for measurement system performance, most notably the calibration procedures and instrument performance characteristics.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 04 Jan 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 15JAP2. SGM 15JAP2 2130 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules The instrument performance characteristics that are provided are nonmandatory and also do not provide the same level of quality assurance as the EPA methods. For example, the zero and span/ calibration drift is only checked weekly, whereas the EPA methods require drift checks after each run. Two very similar standards, ASTM D5835   95, `` Standard Practice for Sampling Stationary Source Emissions for Automated Determination of Gas Concentration,'' and ISO 10396: 1993, `` Stationary Source Emissions: Sampling for the Automated Determination of Gas Concentrations,'' are impractical alternatives to EPA Method 3A for the purposes of the proposed rulemaking because they lack in detail and quality assurance/ quality control requirements. Specifically, those two standards do not include the following: ( 1) Sensitivity of the method, ( 2) acceptable levels of analyzer calibration error, ( 3) acceptable levels of sampling system bias, ( 4) zero drift and calibration drift limits, time span, and required testing frequency, ( 5) a method to test the interference response of the analyzer, ( 6) procedures to determine the minimum sampling time per run and minimum measurement time, and ( 7) specifications for data recorders in terms of resolution ( all types) and recording intervals ( digital and analog recorders only). The VCS ISO 12039: 2001, `` Stationary Source Emissions   Determination of Carbon Monoxide, Carbon Dioxide, and Oxygen   Automated Methods,'' is not acceptable as an alternative to EPA Method 3A. The ISO standard is similar to EPA Method 3A, but is missing some key features. In terms of sampling, the hardware required by ISO 12039: 2001 does not include a three way calibration valve assembly or equivalent to block the sample gas flow while calibration gases are introduced. In its calibration procedures, ISO 12039: 2001 only specifies a two point calibration while EPA Method 3A specifies a three point calibration. Also, ISO 12039: 2001 does not specify performance criteria for calibration error, calibration drift, or sampling system bias tests, as in the EPA method, although checks of those quality control features are required by the ISO standard. The VCS ISO 11890   1 ( 2000) Part 1, `` Paints and Varnishes   Determination of Volatile Organic Compound ( VOC) Content   Difference Method,'' is impractical as an alternative to EPA Method 24 because measured nonvolatile matter content can vary with experimental factors such as temperature, length of heating period, size of weighing dish, and size of sample. The standard ISO 11890   1 allows for different dish weights and sample sizes than the one size ( 58 millimeters in diameter and sample size of 0.5 gram) of EPA Method 24. The standard ISO 11890   1 also allows for different oven temperatures and heating times depending on the type of coating, whereas EPA Method 24 requires 60 minutes heating at 110 degrees Celsius at all times. Because the EPA Method 24 test conditions and procedures define volatile matter, ISO 11890   1 is unacceptable as an alternative because of its different test conditions. The VCS ISO 11890   2 ( 2000) Part 2, `` Paints and Varnishes   Determination of Volatile Organic Compound ( VOC) Content   Gas Chromatographic Method,'' is impractical as an alternative to EPA Method 24 because ISO 11890   2 only measures the VOC added to the coating and would not measure any VOC generated from the curing of the coating. The EPA Method 24 does measure cure VOC, which can be significant in some cases, and, therefore, ISO 11890   2 is not an acceptable alternative to this EPA method. Two VCS, EN 12619: 1999 `` Stationary Source Emissions   Determination of the Mass Concentration of Total Gaseous Organic Carbon at Low Concentrations in Flue Gases   Continuous Flame Ionization Detector Method'' and ISO 14965: 2000( E) `` Air Quality   Determination of Total Nonmethane Organic Compounds   Cryogenic Preconcentration and Direct Flame Ionization Method,'' are impractical alternatives to EPA Method 25 and 25A for the purposes of the proposed rulemaking because the standards do not apply to solvent process vapors in concentrations greater than 40 ppm ( EN 12619) and 10 ppm carbon ( ISO 14965). Methods whose upper limits are that low are too limited to be useful in measuring source emissions, which are expected to be much higher. Three of the 14 VCS identified in the search were not available at the time the review was conducted for the purposes of the proposed rule because they are under development by a VCS body: ASME/ BSR MFC 13M, `` Flow Measurement by Velocity Traverse,'' for EPA Method 2 ( and possibly 1); ASME/ BSR MFC 12M, `` Flow in Closed Conduits Using Multiport Averaging Pitot Primary Flowmeters,'' for EPA Method 2; and ISO/ CD 17895, `` Paints and Varnishes   Determination of the Volatile Organic Compound Content of Water based Emulsion Paints,'' for EPA Method 24. Listed in 40 CFR 63.3541, 63.3551, 63.3561, 63.3564, 63.3565, 63.3566, 63.3571, 63.3574, 63.3575, and 63.3576 to subpart KKKK of the proposed standards are the EPA testing methods included in the regulation. Under 40 CFR 63.7( f) and 40 CFR 63.8( f) of subpart A of the General Provisions, a source may apply to EPA for permission to use alternative test methods or alternative monitoring requirements in place of any of the EPA testing methods, performance specifications, or procedures.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: November 26, 2002. Christine Todd Whitman, Administrator.

For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I, part 63 of the Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 63   [ AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U. S. C. 7401, et seq.

2. Part 63 is amended by adding subpart KKKK to read as follows:

Subpart KKKK   National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Surface Coating of Metal Cans Sec.

What this Subpart Covers 63.3480 What is the purpose of this subpart? 63.3481 Am I subject to this subpart? 63.3482 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover? 63.3483 When do I have to comply with this subpart?

Emission Limitations 63.3490 What emission limits must I meet? 63.3491 What are my options for meeting the emission limits? 63.3492 What operating limits must I meet? 63.3493 What work practice standards must I meet?

General Compliance Requirements 63.3500 What are my general requirements for complying with this subpart? 63.3501 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?

Notifications, Reports, and Records 63.3510 What notifications must I submit? 63.3520 What reports must I submit? 63.3530 What records must I keep?

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 04 Jan 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 15JAP2. SGM 15JAP2 2131 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules 63.3531 In what form and for how long must I keep my records?

Compliance Requirements for the Compliant Material Option 63.3540 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance demonstration? 63.3541 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limitations? 63.3542 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission limitations?

Compliance Requirements for the Emission Rate Without Add On Controls Option 63.3550 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance demonstration? 63.3551 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limitations? 63.3552 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission limitations?

Compliance Requirements for the Emission Rate With Add On Controls Option 63.3560 By what date must I conduct performance tests and other initial compliance demonstrations? 63.3561 How do I demonstrate initial compliance? 63.3562 [ Reserved] 63.3563 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission limitations? 63.3564 What are the general requirements for performance tests? 63.3565 How do I determine the emission capture system efficiency? 63.3566 How do I determine the add on control device emission destruction or removal efficiency? 63.3567 How do I establish the emission capture system and add on control device operating limits during the performance test? 63.3568 What are the requirements for continuous parameter monitoring system installation, operation, and maintenance?

Compliance Requirements for the Control Efficiency/ Outlet Concentration Option 63.3570 By what date must I conduct performance tests and other initial compliance demonstrations? 63.3571 How do I demonstrate initial compliance? 63.3572 [ Reserved] 63.3573 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission limitations? 63.3574 What are the general requirements for performance tests? 63.3575 How do I determine the emission capture system efficiency? 63.3576 How do I determine the add on control device emission destruction or removal efficiency? 63.3577 How do I establish the emission capture system and add on control device operating limits during the performance test? 63.3578 What are the requirements for continuous parameter monitoring system installation, operation, and maintenance?

Other Requirements and Information 63.3580 Who implements and enforces this subpart? 63.3581 What definitions apply to this subpart?

Tables to Subpart KKKK of Part 63 Table 1 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63 Emission Limits for New or Reconstructed Affected Sources Table 2 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63 Emission Limits for Existing Affected Sources Table 3 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63 Emission Limits for Affected Sources Using the Control Efficiency/ Outlet Concentration Compliance Option Table 4 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63 Operating Limits if Using the Emission Rate with Add on Controls Option or the Control Efficiency/ Outlet Concentration Compliance Option Table 5 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63 Applicability of General Provisions to Subpart KKKK Table 6 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63 Default Organic HAP Mass Fraction for Solvents and Solvent Blends Table 7 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63 Default Organic HAP Mass Fraction for Petroleum Solvent Groups What This Subpart Covers § 63.3480 What is the purpose of this subpart? This subpart establishes national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants ( NESHAP) for metal can surface coating facilities. This subpart also establishes requirements to demonstrate initial and continuous compliance with the emission limitations.

§ 63.3481 Am I subject to this subpart? ( a) Except as provided in paragraph ( c) of this section, the source category to which this subpart applies is surface coating of metal cans and ends ( including decorative tins) and metal crowns and closures. It includes the subcategories listed in paragraphs ( a)( 1) through ( 4) of this section. Surface coating is the application of coatings to a substrate using, for example, spray guns or dip tanks. ( 1) One and two piece draw and iron can body coating. The one and twopiece draw and iron can body coating subcategory includes all coating processes involved in the manufacture of can bodies by the draw and iron process. This subcategory includes three distinct coating type segments reflecting the coatings appropriate for cans with different end uses. Those are two piece beverage can body coatings, two piece food can body coatings, and one piece aerosol can body coatings. ( 2) Sheetcoating. The sheetcoating subcategory includes all of the flat metal sheet coating operations associated with the manufacture of three piece cans, decorative tins, crowns, and closures. ( 3) Three piece can body assembly coating. The three piece can body assembly coating subcategory includes all of the coating processes involved in the assembly of three piece metal can bodies. The subcategory includes five distinct coating type segments reflecting the coatings appropriate for cans with different end uses. Those are inside spray on food cans, aseptic side seam stripes on food cans, non aseptic side seam stripes on food cans, side seam stripes on general line non food cans, and side seam stripes on aerosol nonfood cans. ( 4) End lining. The end lining subcategory includes the application of end seal compounds to metal can ends. That subcategory includes two distinct coating type segments reflecting the end seal compounds appropriate for can ends with different end uses. Those are aseptic end seal compounds and nonaseptic end seal compounds. ( b) You are subject to this subpart if you own or operate a new, reconstructed, or existing affected source, as defined in § 63.3482, that uses 5,700 liters ( 1,500 gallons ( gal)) per year or more of coatings in the surface coating of metal cans or ends ( including decorative tins) or metal crowns or closures and that is a major source, is located at a major source, or is part of a major source of emissions of hazardous air pollutants ( HAP). A major source of HAP emissions is any stationary source or group of stationary sources located within a contiguous area and under common control that emits or has the potential to emit any single HAP at a rate of 9.07 megagrams ( Mg) ( 10 tons) or more per year or any combination of HAP at a rate of 22.68 Mg ( 25 tons) or more per year. ( c) This subpart does not apply to surface coating that meets the criteria of paragraphs ( c)( 1) through ( 5) of this section. ( 1) Surface coating conducted at a source that uses only coatings, thinners, and cleaning materials that contain no organic HAP, as determined according to § 63.3541( a). ( 2) Surface coating subject to any other NESHAP in this part as of [ date of publication of the final rule in the Federal Register]. ( 3) Surface coating that occurs at research or laboratory facilities or that is part of janitorial, building, and facility maintenance operations. ( 4) Surface coating of continuous metal coil that may subsequently be VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 04 Jan 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 15JAP2. SGM 15JAP2 2132 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules used in manufacturing cans. Subpart SSSS of this part covers surface coating performed on a continuous metal coil substrate. ( 5) Surface coating of metal pails, buckets, and drums. Subpart MMMM of this part covers surface coating of all metal parts and products not explicitly covered by another subpart.

§ 63.3482 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?

( a) This subpart applies to each new, reconstructed, and existing affected source. ( b) The affected source is the collection of all of the items listed in paragraphs ( b)( 1) through ( 4) of this section that are used for surface coating of metal cans and ends ( including decorative tins), or metal crowns or closures within each subcategory: ( 1) All coating operations as defined in § 63.3581; ( 2) All storage containers and mixing vessels in which coatings, thinners, and cleaning materials are stored or mixed; ( 3) All manual and automated equipment and containers used for conveying coatings, thinners, and cleaning materials; and ( 4) All storage containers and all manual and automated equipment and containers used for conveying waste materials generated by a coating operation. ( c) An affected source is a new affected source if it meets the criteria in paragraph ( c)( 1) of this section and the criteria in either paragraph ( c)( 2) or ( 3) of this section. ( 1) You commenced construction of the source after January 15, 2003 by installing new coating equipment. ( 2) The new coating equipment is used to perform metal can surface coating at a facility where no metal can surface coating was previously performed. ( 3) The new coating equipment is used to perform metal can surface coating in a subcategory at a facility where no surface coating in that subcategory was previously performed. ( d) An affected source is reconstructed if you meet the criteria as defined in § 63.2. ( e) An affected source is existing if it is not new or reconstructed.

§ 63.3483 When do I have to comply with this subpart?

The date by which you must comply with this subpart is called the compliance date. The compliance date for each type of affected source is specified in paragraphs ( a) through ( c) of this section. The compliance date begins the initial compliance period during which you conduct the initial compliance demonstration described in § § 63.3540, 63.3550, 63.3560, and 63.3570. ( a) For a new or reconstructed affected source, the compliance date is the applicable date in paragraph ( a)( 1) or ( 2) of this section. ( 1) If the initial startup of your new or reconstructed affected source is before [ date of publication of final rule in the Federal Register], the compliance date is [ date of publication of final rule in the Federal Register]. ( 2) If the initial startup of your new or reconstructed affected source occurs after [ date of publication of final rule in the Federal Register], the compliance date is the date of initial startup of your affected source. ( b) For an existing affected source, the compliance date is [ date 3 years after date of publication of final rule in the Federal Register]. ( c) For an area source that increases its emissions or its potential to emit such that it becomes a major source of HAP emissions, the compliance date is specified in paragraphs ( c)( 1) and ( 2) of this section. ( 1) For any portion of the source that becomes a new or reconstructed affected source subject to this subpart, the compliance date is the date of initial startup of the affected source or [ date of publication of final rule in the Federal Register], whichever is later. ( 2) For any portion of the source that becomes an existing affected source subject to this subpart, the compliance date is the date 1 year after the area source becomes a major source or [ date 3 years after date of publication of final rule in the Federal Register], whichever is later. ( d) You must meet the notification requirements in § 63.3510 according to the dates specified in that section and in subpart A of this part. Some of the notifications must be submitted before the compliance dates described in paragraphs ( a) through ( c) of this section.

Emission Limitations § 63.3490 What emission limits must I meet?

( a) For a new or reconstructed affected source, you must limit organic HAP emissions to the atmosphere to no more than the emission limit( s) in Table 1 to this subpart that apply to you during each 12 month compliance period, determined according to the requirements in § § 63.3541, 63.3551, or 63.3561 or, if you control emissions with an emissions control system using the control efficiency/ outlet concentration option as specified in § 63.3491( d), you must reduce organic HAP emissions to the atmosphere to no more than the limit( s) in Table 3 to this subpart determined according to the requirements of § 63.3571. If you perform surface coating in more than one subcategory or utilize more than one coating type within a subcategory, then you must meet the individual emission limit( s) for each subcategory and coating type included. ( b) For an existing affected source, you must limit organic HAP emissions to the atmosphere to no more than the emission limit( s) in Table 2 to this subpart that apply to you during each 12 month compliance period, determined according to the requirements in § § 63.3541, 63.3551, or 63.3561 or, if you control emissions with an emissions control system using the control efficiency/ outlet concentration option as specified in § 63.3491( d), you must reduce organic HAP emissions to the atmosphere to no more than the limit( s) in Table 3 to this subpart determined according to the requirements of § 63.3571. If you perform surface coating in more than one subcategory or utilize more than one coating type within a subcategory, then you must meet the individual emission limit( s) for each subcategory and coating type included. ( c) If you perform surface coating in different subcategories as described in § 63.3481( a)( 1) through ( 4), then the coating operations in each subcategory constitute a separate affected source and you must conduct separate compliance demonstrations for each applicable subcategory and coating type emission limit in paragraphs ( a) and ( b) of this section and reflect those separate determinations in notifications, reports, and records required by § § 63.3510, 63.3520, and 63.3530, respectively.

§ 63.3491 What are my options for meeting the emission limits? You must include all coatings and thinners used in all surface coating operations within a subcategory or coating type segment when determining whether the organic HAP emission rate is equal to or less than the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490. To make that determination, you must use at least one of the four compliance options listed in paragraphs ( a) through ( d) of this section. You may apply any of the compliance options to an individual coating operation or to multiple coating operations within a subcategory or coating type segment as a group. You may use different compliance options for different coating operations or at different times on the same coating VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 04 Jan 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 15JAP2. SGM 15JAP2 2133 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules operation. However, you may not use different compliance options at the same time on the same coating operation. If you switch between compliance options for any coating operation or group of coating operations, you must document that switch as required by § 63.3530( c) and you must report it in the next semiannual compliance report required in § 63.3520. ( a) Compliant material option. Demonstrate that the organic HAP content of each coating used in the coating operation( s) is less than or equal to the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490 and that each thinner used contains no organic HAP. You must meet all the requirements of § § 63.3540, 63.3541, and 63.3542 to demonstrate compliance with the emission limit using this option. ( b) Emission rate without add on controls option. Demonstrate that, based on the coatings and thinners used in the coating operation( s), the organic HAP emission rate for the coating operation( s) is less than or equal to the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490, calculated as a rolling 12 month emission rate and determined on a monthly basis. You must meet all the requirements of § § 63.3550, 63.3551, and 63.3552 to demonstrate compliance with the emission limit using this option. ( c) Emission rate with add on controls option. Demonstrate that, based on the coatings and thinners used in the coating operation( s) and the emission reductions achieved by emission capture systems and add on controls, the organic HAP emission rate for the coating operation( s) is less than or equal to the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490, calculated as a rolling 12 month emission rate and determined on a monthly basis. If you use that compliance option, you must also demonstrate that all emission capture systems and add on control devices for the coating operation( s) meet the operating limits required in § 63.3492, except for solvent recovery systems for which you conduct liquid liquid material balances according to § 63.3561( j), and that you meet the work practice standards required in § 63.3493. You must meet all the requirements of § § 63.3560 through 63.3568 to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits, operating limits, and work practice standards using this option. ( d) Control efficiency/ outlet concentration option. Demonstrate that, based on the emission reductions achieved by emission capture systems and add on controls, total HAP emissions measured as total hydrocarbon ( THC) are reduced by 95 percent or greater for existing sources or 97 percent or greater for new or reconstructed sources or that outlet THC emissions are less than or equal to 20 parts per million by volume, dry basis ( ppmvd). If you use that compliance option, you must have a capture device that meets EPA Method 204 criteria for a permanent total enclosure ( PTE). You must also demonstrate that all emission capture systems and add on control devices for the coating operation( s) meet the operating limits required in § 63.3492 and that you meet the work practice standards required in § 63.3493. You must meet all the requirements of § § 63.3570 through 63.3578 to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits, operating limits, and work practice standards using that option.

§ 63.3492 What operating limits must I meet?

( a) For any coating operation( s) on which you use the compliant material option or the emission rate without addon controls option, you are not required to meet any operating limits. ( b) For any controlled coating operation( s) on which you use the emission rate with add on controls option or the control efficiency/ outlet concentration option except those for which you use a solvent recovery system and conduct a liquid liquid material balance according to § 63.3561( j), you must meet the operating limits specified in Table 4 to this subpart. Those operating limits apply to the emission capture and control systems on the coating operation( s) for which you use the options. You must establish the operating limits during the performance test according to the requirements in § 63.3567 or § 63.3577, and you must meet the operating limits at all times after you establish them. ( c) If you use an add on control device other than those listed in Table 4 to this subpart or wish to monitor an alternative parameter and comply with a different operating limit, you must apply to the Administrator for approval of alternative monitoring under § 63.8( f).

§ 63.3493 What work practice standards must I meet?

( a) For any coating operation( s) for which you use the compliant material option or the emission rate without addon controls option, you are not required to meet any work practice standards. ( b) If you use the emission rate with add on controls option or the control efficiency/ outlet concentration option to comply with the emission limitations, you must develop and implement a work practice plan to minimize organic HAP emissions from the storage, mixing, and conveying of coatings, thinners, and cleaning materials used in, and waste materials generated by, the coating operation( s) for which you use those options; or you must meet an alternative standard as provided in paragraph ( c) of this section. The plan must specify practices and procedures to ensure that, at a minimum, the elements specified in paragraphs ( b)( 1) through ( 5) of this section are implemented. ( 1) All organic HAP containing coatings, thinners, cleaning materials, and waste materials must be stored in closed containers. ( 2) Spills of organic HAP containing coatings, thinners, cleaning materials, and waste materials must be minimized. ( 3) Organic HAP containing coatings, thinners, cleaning materials, and waste materials must be conveyed from one location to another in closed containers or pipes. ( 4) Mixing vessels which contain organic HAP containing coatings and other materials must be closed except when adding to, removing, or mixing the contents. ( 5) Emissions of organic HAP must be minimized during cleaning of storage, mixing, and conveying equipment. ( c) As provided in § 63.6( g), we, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA), may choose to grant you permission to use an alternative to the work practice standards in this section.

General Compliance Requirements § 63.3500 What are my general requirements for complying with this subpart? ( a) You must be in compliance with the emission limitations in this subpart as specified in paragraphs ( a)( 1) and ( 2) of this section. ( 1) Any coating operation( s) for which you use the compliant material option or the emission rate without add on controls option, as specified in § 63.3491( a) and ( b), must be in compliance with the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490. ( 2) Any coating operation( s) for which you use the emission rate with add on controls option, as specified in § 63.3491( c), or the control efficiency/ outlet concentration option, as specified in § 63.3491( d), must be in compliance with the emission limitations as specified in paragraphs ( a)( 2)( i) through ( iii) of this section. ( i) The coating operation( s) must be in compliance with the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490 at all times.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 04 Jan 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 15JAP2. SGM 15JAP2 2134 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules ( ii) The coating operation( s) must be in compliance with the operating limits for emission capture systems and addon control devices required by § 63.3492 at all times except for those for which you use a solvent recovery system and conduct liquid liquid material balances according to § 63.3561( j). ( iii) The coating operation( s) must be in compliance with the work practice standards in § 63.3493 at all times. ( b) You must always operate and maintain your affected source, including all air pollution control and monitoring equipment you use for purposes of complying with this subpart, according to the provisions in § 63.6( e)( 1)( i). ( c) If your affected source uses an emission capture system and add on control device for purposes of complying with this subpart, you must develop and implement a written startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan ( SSMP) according to the provisions in § 63.6( e)( 3). The plan must address startup, shutdown, and corrective actions in the event of a malfunction of the emission capture system or the addon control device. The plan must also address any coating operation equipment that may cause increased emissions or that would affect capture efficiency if the process equipment malfunctions, such as conveyors that move parts among enclosures.

§ 63.3501 What parts of the General Provisions apply to me? Table 5 to this subpart shows which parts of the General Provisions in § § 63.1 through 63.15 apply to you.

Notifications, Reports, and Records § 63.3510 What notifications must I submit? ( a) General. You must submit the notifications in § § 63.7( b) and ( c), 63.8( f)( 4), and 63.9( b) through ( e) and ( h) that apply to you by the dates specified in those sections, except as provided in paragraphs ( b) and ( c) of this section. ( b) Initial notification. You must submit the Initial Notification required by § 63.9( b) for a new or reconstructed affected source no later than 120 days after initial startup or 120 days after [ date of publication of final rule in the Federal Register], whichever is later. For an existing affected source, you must submit the Initial Notification no later than [ date 1 year after date of publication of final rule in the Federal Register]. ( c) Notification of compliance status. You must submit the Notification of Compliance Status required by § 63.9( h) no later than 30 calendar days following the end of the initial compliance period described in § § 63.3540, 63.3550, 63.3560, or 63.3570 that applies to your affected source. The Notification of Compliance Status must contain the information specified in paragraphs ( c)( 1) through ( 9) of this section and in § 63.9( h). ( 1) Company name and address. ( 2) Statement by a responsible official with that official's name, title, and signature certifying the truth, accuracy, and completeness of the content of the report. ( 3) Date of the report and beginning and ending dates of the reporting period. The reporting period is the initial compliance period described in § § 63.3540, 63.3550, 63.3560, or 63.3570 that applies to your affected source. ( 4) Identification of the compliance option or options specified in § 63.3491 that you used on each coating operation in the affected source during the initial compliance period. ( 5) Statement of whether or not the affected source achieved the emission limitations for the initial compliance period. ( 6) If you had a deviation, include the information in paragraphs ( c)( 6)( i) and ( ii) of this section. ( i) A description of and statement of the cause of the deviation. ( ii) If you failed to meet the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490, include all the calculations you used to determine the kilogram ( kg) organic HAP emitted per liter of coating solids used. You do not need to submit information provided by the materials suppliers or manufacturers or test reports. ( 7) For each of the data items listed in paragraphs ( c)( 7)( i) through ( iv) of this section that is required by the compliance option( s) you used to demonstrate compliance with the emission limit, include an example of how you determined the value, including calculations and supporting data. Supporting data can include a copy of the information provided by the supplier or manufacturer of the example coating or material or a summary of the results of testing conducted according to § 63.3541( a), ( b), or ( c). You do not need to submit copies of any test reports. ( i) Mass fraction of organic HAP for one coating and for one thinner. ( ii) Volume fraction of coating solids for one coating. ( iii) Density for one coating and one thinner, except that if you use the compliant material option, only the example coating density is required. ( iv) The amount of waste materials and the mass of organic HAP contained in the waste materials for which you are claiming an allowance in Equation 1 of § 63.3551. ( 8) The calculation of kg organic HAP emitted per liter of coating solids used for the compliance option( s) you used, as specified in paragraphs ( c)( 8)( i) through ( iii) of this section. ( i) For the compliant material option, provide an example calculation of the organic HAP content for one coating, using Equation 1 of § 63.3541. ( ii) For the emission rate without addon controls option, provide the calculation of the total mass of organic HAP emissions for each month, the calculation of the total volume of coating solids used each month, and the calculation of the 12 month organic HAP emission rate, using Equations 1, 1A through 1C, 2, and 3, respectively, of § 63.3551. ( iii) For the emission rate with add on controls option, provide the calculation of the total mass of organic HAP emissions for the coatings and thinners used each month, using Equations 1 and 1A through 1C of § 63.3551; the calculation of the total volume of coating solids used each month, using Equation 2 of § 63.3551; the calculation of the mass of organic HAP emission reduction each month by emission capture systems and add on control devices, using Equations 1 and 1A through 1D of § 63.3561, and Equations 2, 3, and 3A through 3C of § 63.3561, as applicable; the calculation of the total mass of organic HAP emissions each month, using Equation 4 of § 63.3561, as applicable; and the calculation of the 12 month organic HAP emission rate, using Equation 5 of § 63.3561. ( 9) For the emission rate with add on controls option or the control efficiency/ outlet concentration option, you must include the information specified in paragraphs ( c)( 9)( i) through ( iv) of this section. The requirements in paragraphs ( c)( 9)( i) through ( iii) of this section do not apply to solvent recovery systems for which you conduct liquid liquid material balances according to § 63.3561( j). ( i) For each emission capture system, a summary of the data and copies of the calculations supporting the determination that the emission capture system is a PTE or a measurement of the emission capture system efficiency. Include a description of the protocol followed for measuring capture efficiency, summaries of any capture efficiency tests conducted, and any calculations supporting the capture efficiency determination. If you use the data quality objective ( DQO) or lower confidence limit ( LCL) approach, you must also include the statistical calculations to show you meet the DQO or LCL criteria in appendix A to subpart VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 04 Jan 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 15JAP2. SGM 15JAP2 2135 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules KK of this part. You do not need to submit complete test reports. ( ii) A summary of the results of each add on control device performance test. You do not need to submit complete test reports. ( iii) A list of each emission capture system's and add on control device's operating limits and a summary of the data used to calculate those limits. ( iv) A statement of whether or not you developed and implemented the work practice plan required by § 63.3493.

§ 63.3520 What reports must I submit? ( a) Semiannual compliance reports. You must submit semiannual compliance reports for each affected source according to the requirements of paragraphs ( a)( 1) through ( 7) of this section. The semiannual compliance reporting requirements may be satisfied by reports required under other parts of the Clean Air Act ( CAA), as specified in paragraph ( a)( 2) of this section. ( 1) Dates. Unless the Administrator has approved a different schedule for submission of reports under § 63.10( a), you must prepare and submit each semiannual compliance report according to the dates specified in paragraphs ( a)( 1)( i) through ( iv) of this section. Note that the information reported for each of the months in the reporting period will be based on the last 12 months of data prior to the date of each monthly calculation. ( i) The first semiannual compliance report must cover the first semiannual reporting period which begins the day after the end of the initial compliance period described in § 63.3540, § 63.3550, § 63.3560, or § 63.3570 that applies to your affected source and ends on June 30 or December 31, whichever occurs first following the end of the initial compliance period. ( ii) Each subsequent semiannual compliance report must cover the subsequent semiannual reporting period from January 1 through June 30 or the semiannual reporting period from July 1 through December 31. ( iii) Each semiannual compliance report must be postmarked or delivered no later than July 31 or January 31, whichever date is the first date following the end of the semiannual reporting period. ( iv) For each affected source that is subject to permitting regulations pursuant to 40 CFR part 70 or 40 CFR part 71, and if the permitting authority has established dates for submitting semiannual reports pursuant to 40 CFR 70.6( a)( 3)( iii)( A) or 40 CFR 71.6( a)( 3)( iii)( A), you may submit the first and subsequent compliance reports according to the dates the permitting authority has established instead of the date specified in paragraph ( a)( 1)( iii) of this section. ( 2) Inclusion with title V report. Each affected source that has obtained a title V operating permit pursuant to 40 CFR part 70 or 40 CFR part 71 must report all deviations as defined in this subpart in the semiannual monitoring report required by 40 CFR 70.6( a)( 3)( iii)( A) or 40 CFR 71.6( a)( 3)( iii)( A). If an affected source submits a semiannual compliance report pursuant to this section along with, or as part of, the semiannual monitoring report required by 40 CFR 70.6( a)( 3)( iii)( A) or 40 CFR 71.6( a)( 3)( iii)( A), and the semiannual compliance report includes all required information concerning deviations from any emission limitation in this subpart, its submission will be deemed to satisfy any obligation to report the same deviations in the semiannual monitoring report. However, submission of a semiannual compliance report shall not otherwise affect any obligation the affected source may have to report deviations from permit requirements to the permitting authority. ( 3) General requirements. The semiannual compliance report must contain the information specified in paragraphs ( a)( 3)( i) through ( v) of this section and the information specified in paragraphs ( a)( 4) through ( 7) and ( c)( 1) of this section that is applicable to your affected source. ( i) Company name and address. ( ii) Statement by a responsible official with that official's name, title, and signature, certifying the truth, accuracy, and completeness of the content of the report. ( iii) Date of report and beginning and ending dates of the reporting period. The reporting period is the 6 month period ending on June 30 or December 31. Note that the information reported for each of the 6 months in the reporting period will be based on the last 12 months of data prior to the date of each monthly calculation. ( iv) Identification of the compliance option or options specified in § 63.3491 that you used on each coating operation during the reporting period. If you switched between compliance options during the reporting period, you must report the beginning and ending dates you used each option. ( v) If you used the emission rate without add on controls or the emission rate with add on controls compliance option ( § 63.3491( b) or ( c)), the calculation results for each rolling 12 month organic HAP emission rate during the 6 month reporting period. ( 4) No deviations. If there were no deviations from the emission limitations, operating limits, or work practice standards in § § 63.3490, 63.3492, and 63.3493 that apply to you, the semiannual compliance report must include a statement that there were no deviations from the emission limitations during the reporting period. If you used the emission rate with add on controls option or the control efficiency/ outlet concentration option and there were no periods during which the continuous parameter monitoring systems ( CPMS) were out of control as specified in § 63.8( c)( 7), the semiannual compliance report must include a statement that there were no periods during which the CPMS were out of control during the reporting period. ( 5) Deviations: compliant material option. If you used the compliant material option and there was a deviation from the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490, the semiannual compliance report must contain the information in paragraphs ( a)( 5)( i) through ( iv) of this section. ( i) Identification of each coating used that deviated from the emission limit, each thinner used that contained organic HAP, and the dates and time periods each was used. ( ii) The calculation of the organic HAP content ( using Equation 1 of § 63.3541) for each coating identified in paragraph ( a)( 5)( i) of this section. You do not need to submit background data supporting this calculation, for example, information provided by coating suppliers or manufacturers, or test reports. ( iii) The determination of mass fraction of organic HAP for each coating and thinner identified in paragraph ( a)( 5)( i) of this section. You do not need to submit background data supporting this calculation, for example, information provided by material suppliers or manufacturers, or test reports. ( iv) A statement of the cause of each deviation. ( 6) Deviations: emission rate without add on controls option. If you used the emission rate without add on controls option and there was a deviation from the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490, the semiannual compliance report must contain the information in paragraphs ( a)( 6)( i) through ( iii) of this section. ( i) The beginning and ending dates of each compliance period during which the 12 month organic HAP emission rate exceeded the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490. ( ii) The calculations used to determine the 12 month organic HAP emission rate for the compliance period in which the deviation occurred. You VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 04 Jan 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 15JAP2. SGM 15JAP2 2136 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules must provide the calculations for Equations 1, 1A through 1C, 2, and 3 in § 63.3551; and if applicable, the calculation used to determine mass of organic HAP in waste materials according to § 63.3551( e)( 4). You do not need to submit background data supporting these calculations, for example, information provided by materials suppliers or manufacturers, or test reports. ( iii) A statement of the cause of each deviation. ( 7) Deviations: emission rate with add on controls option. If you used the emission rate with add on controls option and there was a deviation from an emission limitation ( including any periods when emissions bypassed the add on control device and were diverted to the atmosphere), the semiannual compliance report must contain the information in paragraphs ( a)( 7)( i) through ( xiv) of this section. That includes periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction during which deviations occurred. ( i) The beginning and ending dates of each compliance period during which the 12 month organic HAP emission rate exceeded the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490. ( ii) The calculations used to determine the 12 month organic HAP emission rate for each compliance period in which a deviation occurred. You must provide the calculation of the total mass of organic HAP emissions for the coatings and thinners used each month, using Equations 1 and 1A through 1C of § 63.3551 and, if applicable, the calculation used to determine mass of organic HAP in waste materials according to § 63.3551( e)( 4); the calculation of the total volume of coating solids used each month, using Equation 2 of § 63.3551; the calculation of the mass of organic HAP emission reduction each month by emission capture systems and add on control devices, using Equations 1 and 1A through 1D of § 63.3561, and Equations 2, 3, and 3A through 3C of § 63.3561, as applicable; the calculation of the total mass of organic HAP emissions each month, using Equation 4 of § 63.3561; and the calculation of the 12 month organic HAP emission rate, using Equation 5 of § 63.3561. You do not need to submit the background data supporting these calculations ( e. g., information provided by materials suppliers or manufacturers, or test reports). ( iii) The date and time that each malfunction started and stopped. ( iv) A brief description of the CPMS. ( v) The date of the latest CPMS certification or audit. ( vi) The date and time that each CPMS was inoperative, except for zero ( low level) and high level checks. ( vii) The date, time, and duration that each CPMS was out of control, including the information in § 63.8( c)( 8). ( viii) The date and time period of each deviation from an operating limit in Table 4 to this subpart; date and time period of any bypass of the add on control device; and whether each deviation occurred during a period of startup, shutdown, or malfunction or during another period. ( ix) A summary of the total duration of each deviation from an operating limit in Table 4 to this subpart and each bypass of the add on control device during the semiannual reporting period and the total duration as a percent of the total source operating time during that semiannual reporting period. ( x) A breakdown of the total duration of the deviations from the operating limits in Table 4 to this subpart and bypasses of the add on control device during the semiannual reporting period into those that were due to startup, shutdown, control equipment problems, process problems, other known causes, and other unknown causes. ( xi) A summary of the total duration of CPMS downtime during the semiannual reporting period and the total duration of CPMS downtime as a percent of the total source operating time during that semiannual reporting period. ( xii) A description of any changes in the CPMS, coating operation, emission capture system, or add on control device since the last semiannual reporting period. ( xiii) For each deviation from the work practice standards, a description of the deviation; the date and time period of the deviation; and the actions you took to correct the deviation. ( xiv) A statement of the cause of each deviation. ( 8) Deviations: control efficiency/ outlet concentration option. If you used the control efficiency/ outlet concentration option, and there was a deviation from an emission limitation ( including any periods when emissions bypassed the add on control device and were diverted to the atmosphere), the semiannual compliance report must contain the information in paragraphs ( a)( 8)( i) through ( xii) of this section. This includes periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction during which deviations occurred. ( i) The date and time that each malfunction started and stopped. ( ii) A brief description of the CPMS. ( iii) The date of the latest certification or audit of the CPMS. ( iv) The date and time that each CPMS was inoperative, except for zero ( low level) and high level checks. ( v) The date, time, and duration that each CPMS was out of control, including the information in § 63.8( c)( 8). ( vi) The date and time period of each deviation from an operating limit in Table 4 of this subpart; date and time of any bypass of the add on control device; and whether each deviation occurred during a period of startup, shutdown, or malfunction or during another period. ( vii) A summary of the total duration of each deviation from an operating limit in Table 4 of this subpart and each bypass of the add on control device during the semiannual reporting period and the total duration as a percent of the total source operating time during that semiannual reporting period. ( viii) A breakdown of the total duration of the deviations from the operating limits in Table 4 of this subpart and bypasses of the add on control device during the semiannual reporting period into those that were due to startup, shutdown, control equipment problems, process problems, other known causes, and other unknown causes. ( ix) A summary of the total duration of CPMS downtime during the semiannual reporting period and the total duration of CPMS downtime as a percent of the total source operating time during that semiannual reporting period. ( x) A description of any changes in the CPMS, coating operation, emission capture system, or add on control device since the last semiannual reporting period. ( xi) For each deviation from the work practice standards, a description of the deviation; the date and time period of the deviation; and the actions you took to correct the deviation. ( xii) A statement of the cause of each deviation. ( b) Performance test reports. If you use the emission rate with add on controls option or the control efficiency/ outlet concentration option, you must submit reports of performance test results for emission capture systems and add on control devices no later than 60 days after completing the tests as specified in § 63.10( d)( 2). ( c) Startup, shutdown, malfunction reports. If you used the emission rate with add on controls option or the control efficiency/ outlet concentration option and you had a startup, shutdown, or malfunction during the semiannual reporting period, you must VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 04 Jan 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 15JAP2. SGM 15JAP2 2137 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules submit the reports specified in paragraphs ( c)( 1) and ( 2) of this section. ( 1) If your actions were consistent with your SSMP, you must include the information specified in § 63.10( d) in the semiannual compliance report required by paragraph ( a) of this section. ( 2) If your actions were not consistent with your SSMP, you must submit an immediate startup, shutdown, and malfunction report as described in paragraphs ( c)( 2)( i) and ( ii) of this section. ( i) You must describe the actions taken during the event in a report delivered by facsimile, telephone, or other means to the Administrator within 2 working days after starting actions that are inconsistent with the plan. ( ii) You must submit a letter to the Administrator within 7 working days after the end of the event, unless you have made alternative arrangements with the Administrator as specified in § 63.10( d)( 5)( ii). The letter must contain the information specified in § 63.10( d)( 5)( ii).

§ 63.3530 What records must I keep?

You must collect and keep records of the data and information specified in this section. Failure to collect and keep the records is a deviation from the applicable standard. ( a) A copy of each notification and report that you submitted to comply with this subpart and the documentation supporting each notification and report. ( b) A current copy of information provided by materials suppliers or manufacturers, such as manufacturer's formulation data, or test data used to determine the mass fraction of organic HAP and density for each coating and thinner and the volume fraction of coating solids for each coating. If you conducted testing to determine mass fraction of organic HAP, density, or volume fraction of coating solids, you must keep a copy of the complete test report. If you use information provided to you by the manufacturer or supplier of the material that was based on testing, you must keep the summary sheet of results provided to you by the manufacturer or supplier. You are not required to obtain the test report or other supporting documentation from the manufacturer or supplier. ( c) For each compliance period, the records specified in paragraphs ( c)( 1) through ( 4) of this section. ( 1) A record of the coating operations at which you used each compliance option and the time periods ( beginning and ending dates and times) you used each option. ( 2) For the compliant material option, a record of the calculation of the organic HAP content for each coating, using Equation 1 of § 63.3541. ( 3) For the emission rate without addon controls option, a record of the calculation of the total mass of organic HAP emissions for the coatings and thinners used each month, using Equations 1, 1A through 1C, and 2 of § 63.3551 and, if applicable, the calculation used to determine mass of organic HAP in waste materials according to § 63.3551( e)( 4); the calculation of the total volume of coating solids used each month, using Equation 2 of § 63.3551; and the calculation of each 12 month organic HAP emission rate, using Equation 3 of § 63.3551. ( 4) For the emission rate with add on controls option, records of the calculations specified in paragraphs ( c)( 4)( i) through ( v) of this section. ( i) The calculation of the total mass of organic HAP emissions for the coatings and thinners used each month, using Equations 1 and 1A through 1C of § 63.3551 and, if applicable, the calculation used to determine mass of organic HAP in waste materials according to § 63.3551( e)( 4). ( ii) The calculation of the total volume of coating solids used each month, using Equation 2 of § 63.3551. ( iii) The calculation of the mass of organic HAP emission reduction by emission capture systems and add on control devices, using Equations 1 and 1A through 1D of § 63.3561, and Equations 2, 3, and 3A through 3C of § 63.3561, as applicable. ( iv) The calculation of the total mass of organic HAP emissions each month, using Equation 4 of § 63.3561. ( v) The calculation of each 12 month organic HAP emission rate, using Equation 5 of § 63.3561. ( 5) For the control efficiency/ outlet concentration option, records of the measurements made by the CPMS used to demonstrate compliance. For any coating operation( s) for which you use this option, you do not have to keep the records specified in paragraphs ( d) through ( g) of this section. ( d) A record of the name and volume of each coating and thinner used during each compliance period. ( e) A record of the mass fraction of organic HAP for each coating and thinner used during each compliance period. ( f) A record of the volume fraction of coating solids for each coating used during each compliance period. ( g) A record of the density for each coating used during each compliance period; and, if you use either the emission rate without add on controls or the emission rate with add on controls compliance option, the density for each thinner used during each compliance period. ( h) If you use an allowance in Equation 1 of § 63.3551 for organic HAP contained in waste materials sent to or designated for shipment to a treatment, storage, and disposal facility ( TSDF) according to § 63.3551( e)( 4), you must keep records of the information specified in paragraphs ( h)( 1) through ( 3) of this section. ( 1) The name and address of each TSDF to which you sent waste materials for which you use an allowance in Equation 1 of § 63.3551, a statement of which subparts under 40 CFR parts 262, 264, 265, and 266 apply to the facility and the date of each shipment. ( 2) Identification of the coating operations producing waste materials included in each shipment and the month or months in which you used the allowance for these materials in Equation 1 of § 63.3551. ( 3) The methodology used in accordance with § 63.3551( e)( 4) to determine the total amount of waste materials sent to or the amount collected, stored, and designated for transport to a TSDF each month and the methodology to determine the mass of organic HAP contained in these waste materials. That must include the sources for all data used in the determination, methods used to generate the data, frequency of testing or monitoring, and supporting calculations and documentation, including the waste manifest for each shipment. ( i) [ Reserved] ( j) You must keep records of the date, time, and duration of each deviation. ( k) If you use the emission rate with add on controls option or the control efficiency/ outlet concentration option, you must keep the records specified in paragraphs ( k)( 1) through ( 8) of this section. ( 1) For each deviation, a record of whether the deviation occurred during a period of startup, shutdown, or malfunction. ( 2) The records in § 63.6( e)( 3)( iii) through ( v) related to startup, shutdown, and malfunction. ( 3) The records required to show continuous compliance with each operating limit specified in Table 4 to this subpart that applies to you. ( 4) For each capture system that is a PTE, the data and documentation you used to support a determination that the capture system meets the criteria in Method 204 of appendix M to 40 CFR part 51 for a PTE and has a capture VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 04 Jan 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 15JAP2. SGM 15JAP2 2138 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules efficiency of 100 percent, as specified in § 63.3565( a). ( 5) For each capture system that is not a PTE, the data and documentation you used to determine capture efficiency according to the requirements specified in § § 63.3564 and 63.3565( b) through ( e) including the records specified in paragraphs ( k)( 5)( i) through ( iii) of this section that apply to you. ( i) Records for a liquid to uncapturedgas protocol using a temporary total enclosure or building enclosure. Records of the mass of total volatile hydrocarbon ( TVH) as measured by Method 204A or F of appendix M to 40 CFR part 51 for each material used in the coating operation and the total TVH for all materials used during each capture efficiency test run including a copy of the test report. Records of the mass of TVH emissions not captured by the capture system that exited the temporary total enclosure ( TTE) or building enclosure during each capture efficiency test run, as measured by Method 204D or E of appendix M to 40 CFR part 51, including a copy of the test report. Records documenting that the enclosure used for the capture efficiency test met the criteria in Method 204 of appendix M to 40 CFR part 51 for either a TTE or a building enclosure. ( ii) Records for a gas to gas protocol using a temporary total enclosure or a building enclosure. Records of the mass of TVH emissions captured by the emission capture system as measured by Method 204B or C of appendix M to 40 CFR part 51 at the inlet to the add on control device including a copy of the test report. Records of the mass of TVH emissions not captured by the capture system that exited the TTE or building enclosure during each capture efficiency test run as measured by Method 204D or E of appendix M to 40 CFR part 51 including a copy of the test report. Records documenting that the enclosure used for the capture efficiency test met the criteria in Method 204 of appendix M to 40 CFR part 51 for either a TTE or a building enclosure. ( iii) Records for an alternative protocol. Records needed to document a capture efficiency determination using an alternative method or protocol as specified in § 63.3565( e) if applicable. ( 6) The records specified in paragraphs ( k)( 6)( i) and ( ii) of this section for each add on control device organic HAP destruction or removal efficiency determination as specified in § 63.3566 or § 63.3576. ( i) Records of each add on control device performance test conducted according to § 63.3564 or § 63.3574 and § 63.3566 or § 63.3576. ( ii) Records of the coating operation conditions during the add on control device performance test showing that the performance test was conducted under representative operating conditions. ( 7) Records of the data and calculations you used to establish the emission capture and add on control device operating limits as specified in § 63.3567 or § 63.3577 and to document compliance with the operating limits as specified in Table 4 to this subpart. ( 8) A record of the work practice plan required by § 63.3493 and documentation that you are implementing the plan on a continuous basis.

§ 63.3531 In what form and for how long must I keep my records?

( a) Your records must be kept in a form suitable and readily available for expeditious review, according to § 63.10( b)( 1). Where appropriate, the records may be maintained as electronic spreadsheets or as a database. ( b) As specified in § 63.10( b)( 1), you must keep each record for 5 years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. ( c) You must keep each record on site for at least 2 years after the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record, according to § 63.10( b)( 1). You may keep the records off site for the remaining 3 years.

Compliance Requirements for the Compliant Material Option § 63.3540 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance demonstration?

You must complete the initial compliance demonstration for the initial compliance period according to the requirements in § 63.3541. The initial compliance period begins on the applicable compliance date specified in § 63.3483 and ends on the last day of the 12th month following the compliance date. If the compliance date occurs on any day other than the first day of a month, then the initial compliance period extends through the end of that month plus the next 12 months. The initial compliance demonstration includes the calculations according to § 63.3541 and supporting documentation showing that, during the initial compliance period, you used no coating with an organic HAP content that exceeded the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490 and that you used no thinners that contained organic HAP. § 63.3541 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limitations? You may use the compliant material option for any individual coating operation, for any group of coating operations within a subcategory or coating type segment, or for all the coating operations within a subcategory or coating type segment. You must use either the emission rate without add on controls option, the emission rate with add on controls option, or the control efficiency/ outlet concentration option for any coating operation in the affected source for which you do not use that option. To demonstrate initial compliance using the compliant material option, the coating operation or group of coating operations must use no coating with an organic HAP content that exceeds the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490 and must use no thinner that contains organic HAP as determined according to this section. Any coating operation for which you use the compliant material option is not required to meet the operating limits or work practice standards required in § § 63.3492 and 63.3493, respectively. You must conduct a separate initial compliance demonstration for each one and two piece draw and iron can body coating, sheet coating, three piece can body assembly coating, and end lining affected source. You must meet all the requirements of this section for the coating operation or group of coating operations using this option. Use the procedures in this section on each coating and thinner in the condition it is in when it is received from its manufacturer or supplier and prior to any alteration ( e. g., mixing or thinning). Do not include any coatings or thinners used on coating operations for which you use the emission rate without addon controls option, the emission rate with add on controls option, or the control efficiency/ outlet concentration option. You do not need to redetermine the HAP content of coatings or thinners that have been reclaimed onsite and reused in the coating operation( s) for which you use the compliant material option, provided these materials in their condition as received were demonstrated to comply with the compliant material option. ( a) Determine the mass fraction of organic HAP for each material used. You must determine the mass fraction of organic HAP for each coating and thinner used during the compliance period by using one of the options in paragraphs ( a)( 1) through ( 5) of this section. ( 1) Method 311 ( appendix A to 40 CFR part 63). You may use Method 311 for determining the mass fraction of VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 04 Jan 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 15JAP2. SGM 15JAP2 2139 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules organic HAP. Use the procedures specified in paragraphs ( a)( 1)( i) and ( ii) of this section when performing a Method 311 test. ( i) Count each organic HAP that is measured to be present at 0.1 percent by mass or more for Occupational Safety and Health Administration ( OSHA) defined carcinogens as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200( d)( 4) and at 1.0 percent by mass or more for other compounds. For example, if toluene ( not an OSHA carcinogen) is measured to be 0.5 percent of the material by mass, you do not have to count it. Express the mass fraction of each organic HAP you count as a value truncated to four places after the decimal point ( for example, 0.3791). ( ii) Calculate the total mass fraction of organic HAP in the test material by adding up the individual organic HAP mass fractions and truncating the result to three places after the decimal point ( for example, 0.763). ( 2) Method 24 ( Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60). For coatings, you may use Method 24 to determine the mass fraction of nonaqueous volatile matter and use that value as a substitute for mass fraction of organic HAP. ( 3) Alternative method. You may use an alternative test method for determining the mass fraction of organic HAP once the Administrator has approved it. You must follow the procedure in § 63.7( f) to submit an alternative test method for approval. ( 4) Information from the supplier or manufacturer of the material. You may rely on information other than that generated by the test methods specified in paragraphs ( a)( 1) through ( 3) of this section, such as manufacturer's formulation data, if it represents each organic HAP that is present at 0.1 percent by mass or more for OSHAdefined carcinogens as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200( d)( 4) and at 1.0 percent by mass or more for other compounds. For example, if toluene ( not an OSHA carcinogen) is 0.5 percent of the material by mass, you do not have to count it. If there is a disagreement between such information and results of a test conducted according to paragraphs ( a)( 1) through ( 3) of this section, then the test method results will take precedence. ( 5) Solvent blends. Solvent blends may be listed as single components for some materials in data provided by manufacturers or suppliers. Solvent blends may contain organic HAP which must be counted toward the total organic HAP mass fraction of the materials. When test data and manufacturer's data for solvent blends are not available, you may use the default values for the mass fraction of organic HAP in those solvent blends listed in Table 6 or 7 to this subpart. If you use the tables, you must use the values in Table 6 to this subpart for all solvent blends that match Table 6 entries, and you may only use Table 7 to this subpart if the solvent blends in the materials you use do not match any of the solvent blends in Table 6 and you only know whether the blend is aliphatic or aromatic. However, if the results of a Method 311 ( 40 CFR part 63, appendix A) test indicate higher values than those listed on Table 6 or 7 to this subpart, the Method 311 ( 40 CFR part 63, appendix A) results will take precedence. ( b) Determine the volume fraction of coating solids for each coating. You must determine the volume fraction of coating solids ( liters of coating solids per liter of coating) for each coating used during the compliance period by a test or by information provided by the supplier or the manufacturer of the material as specified in paragraphs ( b)( 1) and ( 2) of this section. If test results obtained according to paragraph ( b)( 1) of this section do not agree with the information obtained under paragraph ( b)( 2) of this section, the test results will take precedence. ( 1) ASTM Method D2697   86 ( Reapproved 1998) or D6093   97. You may use ASTM Method D2697   86 ( Reapproved 1998) or D6093   97 to determine the volume fraction of coating solids for each coating. Divide the nonvolatile volume percent obtained with the methods by 100 to calculate volume fraction of coating solids. ( 2) Information from the supplier or manufacturer of the material. You may obtain the volume fraction of coating solids for each coating from the supplier or manufacturer. ( c) Determine the density of each coating. Determine the density of each coating used during the compliance period from test results using ASTM Method D1475   98 or information from the supplier or manufacturer of the material. If there is disagreement between ASTM Method D1475   98 test results and the supplier's or manufacturer's information, the test results will take precedence. ( d) Calculate the organic HAP content of each coating. Calculate the organic HAP content, kg organic HAP per liter coating solids, of each coating used during the compliance period, using Equation 1 of this section.

H D W V Eq c c c s =( )( ) ( . 1)

Where: Hc = organic HAP content of the coating, kg organic HAP per liter coating solids. Dc = density of coating, kg coating per liter coating, determined according to paragraph ( c) of this section. Wc = mass fraction of organic HAP in the coating, kg organic HAP per kg coating, determined according to paragraph ( a) of this section. Vs = volume fraction of coating solids, liter coating solids per liter coating, determined according to paragraph ( b) of this section. ( e) Compliance demonstration. The organic HAP content for each coating used during the initial compliance period, determined using Equation 1 of this section, must be less than or equal to the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490 and each thinner used during the initial compliance period must contain no organic HAP, determined according to paragraph ( a) of this section. You must keep all records required by § § 63.3530 and 63.3531. As part of the Notification of Compliance Status required in § 63.3510, you must identify the coating operation( s) for which you used the compliant material option and submit a statement that the coating operation( s) was ( were) in compliance with the emission limitations during the initial compliance period because you used no coatings for which the organic HAP content exceeded the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490 and you used no thinners that contained organic HAP, determined according to paragraph ( a) of this section.

§ 63.3542 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission limitations?

( a) For each compliance period, to demonstrate continuous compliance, you must use no coating for which the organic HAP content, determined using Equation 1 of § 63.3541, exceeds the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490 and use no thinner that contains organic HAP, determined according to § 63.3541( a). A compliance period consists of 12 months. Each month after the end of the initial compliance period described in § 63.3540 is the end of a compliance period consisting of that month and the preceding 11 months. ( b) If you choose to comply with the emission limitations by using the compliant material option, the use of any coating or thinner that does not meet the criteria specified in paragraph ( a) of this section is a deviation from the emission limitations that must be reported as specified in § § 63.3510( b)( 6) and 63.3520( a)( 5).

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 04 Jan 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 15JAP2. SGM 15JAP2 EP15JA03.000</ GPH> 2140 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules ( c) As part of each semiannual compliance report required by § 63.3520, you must identify the coating operation( s) for which you used the compliant material option. If there were no deviations from the emission limitations in § 63.3490, submit a statement that the coating operation( s) was ( were) in compliance with the emission limitations during the reporting period because you used no coating for which the organic HAP content exceeded the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490 and you used no thinner or cleaning material that contained organic HAP, determined according to § 63.3541( a). ( d) You must maintain records as specified in § § 63.3530 and 63.3531.

Compliance Requirements for the Emission Rate Without Add On Controls Option § 63.3550 By what date must I conduct the initial compliance demonstration? You must complete the initial compliance demonstration for the initial compliance period according to the requirements of § 63.3551. The initial compliance period begins on the applicable compliance date specified in § 63.3483 and ends on the last day of the 12th month following the compliance date. If the compliance date occurs on any day other than the first day of a month, then the initial compliance period extends through the end of that month plus the next 12 months. You must determine the mass of organic HAP emissions and volume of coating solids used each month and then calculate a 12 month organic HAP emission rate at the end of the initial 12 month compliance period. The initial compliance demonstration includes the calculations according to § 63.3551 and supporting documentation showing that, during the initial compliance period, the organic HAP emission rate was equal to or less than the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490.

§ 63.3551 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limitations? You may use the emission rate without add on controls option for any coating operation, for any group of coating operations within a subcategory or coating type segment, or for all of the coating operations within a subcategory or coating type segment. You must use either the compliant material option, the emission rate with add on controls option, or the control efficiency/ outlet concentration option for any coating operation in the affected source for which you do not use this option. If you use the alternative overall emission limit for a subcategory according to paragraph ( i) of this section to demonstrate compliance, however, you must include all coating operations in all coating type segments in the subcategory to determine compliance with the overall limit. To demonstrate initial compliance using the emission rate without add on controls option, the coating operation or group of coating operations must meet the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490, but is not required to meet the operating limits or work practice standards in § § 63.3492 and 63.3493, respectively. You must conduct a separate initial compliance demonstration for each one and twopiece draw and iron can body coating, sheet coating, three piece can body assembly coating, and end lining affected source. You must meet all the requirements of this section to demonstrate initial compliance with the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490 for the coating operation( s). When calculating the organic HAP emission rate according to this section, do not include any coatings or thinners used on coating operations for which you use the compliant material option, the emission rate with add on controls option, or the control efficiency/ outlet concentration option or coating operations in a different affected source in a different subcategory. Use the procedures in this section on each coating and thinner in the condition it is in when it is received from its manufacturer or supplier and prior to any alteration ( e. g., mixing or thinning). You do not need to redetermine the mass of organic HAP in coatings or thinners that have been reclaimed onsite and reused in the coating operation( s) for which you use the emission rate without add on controls option. ( a) Determine the mass fraction of organic HAP for each material. Determine the mass fraction of organic HAP for each coating and thinner used during each month according to the requirements in § 63.3541( a). ( b) Determine the volume fraction of coating solids for each coating. Determine the volume fraction of coating solids for each coating used during each month according to the requirements in § 63.3541( b). ( c) Determine the density of each material. Determine the density of each coating and thinner used during each month from test results using ASTM Method D1475   98, information from the supplier or manufacturer of the material, or reference sources providing density or specific gravity data for pure materials. If there is disagreement between ASTM Method D1475   98 test results and such other information sources, the test results will take precedence. ( d) Determine the volume of each material used. Determine the volume ( liters) of each coating and thinner used during each month by measurement or usage records. ( e) Calculate the mass of organic HAP emissions. The mass of organic HAP emissions is the combined mass of organic HAP contained in all coatings and thinners used during each month minus the organic HAP in certain waste materials. Calculate it using Equation 1 of this section.

H A B R Eq e w = +   ( . 1)

Where: He = total mass of organic HAP emissions during the month, kg. A = total mass of organic HAP in the coatings used during the month, kg, as calculated in Equation 1A of this section. B = total mass of organic HAP in the thinners used during the month, kg, as calculated in Equation 1B of this section. Rw = total mass of organic HAP in waste materials sent or designated for shipment to a hazardous waste TSDF for treatment or disposal during the month, kg, determined according to paragraph ( e)( 4) of this section. ( You may assign a value of zero to Rw if you do not wish to use this allowance.) ( 1) Calculate the mass of organic HAP in the coatings used during the month, using Equation 1A of this section.

A Vol D W Eq c i i m c i c i = ( )( )( )

=   , , , ( .

1 1A)

Where: A = total mass of organic HAP in the coatings used during the month, kg. Volc, i = total volume of coating, i, used during the month, liters. Dc, i = density of coating, i, kg coating per liter coating. Wc, i = mass fraction of organic HAP in coating, i, kg organic HAP per kg coating. m = number of different coatings used during the month. ( 2) Calculate the mass of organic HAP in the thinners used during the month using Equation 1B of this section.

B Vol D W Eq t j j n t j t j = ( )( )( )

=   , , , ( .

1 1B)

Where: B = total mass of organic HAP in the thinners used during the month, kg. Volt, j = total volume of thinner, j, used during the month, liters.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 04 Jan 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 15JAP2. SGM 15JAP2 EP15JA03.001</ GPH> EP15JA03.002</ GPH> EP15JA03.003</ GPH> 2141 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules Dt, j = density of thinner, j, kg per liter. Wt, j = mass fraction of organic HAP in thinner, j, kg organic HAP per kg thinner. n = number of different thinners used during the month. ( 3) If you choose to account for the mass of organic HAP contained in waste materials sent or designated for shipment to a hazardous waste TSDF in Equation 1 of this section, then you must determine it according to paragraphs ( e)( 3)( i) through ( iv) of this section. ( i) You may include in the determination only waste materials that are generated by coating operations for which you use Equation 1 of this section and that will be treated or disposed of by a facility regulated as a TSDF under 40 CFR part 262, 264, 265, or 266. The TSDF may be either off site or on site. You may not include organic HAP contained in wastewater. ( ii) You must determine either the amount of the waste materials sent to a TSDF during the month or the amount collected and stored during the month and designated for future transport to a TSDF. Do not include in your determination any waste materials sent to a TSDF during a month if you have already included them in the amount collected and stored during that month or a previous month. ( iii) Determine the total mass of organic HAP contained in the waste materials specified in paragraph ( e)( 4)( ii) of this section. ( iv) You must document the methodology you used to determine the amount of waste materials and the total mass of organic HAP they contain as required in § 63.3530( h). To the extent that waste manifests include this information, they may be used as part of the documentation of the amount of waste materials and mass of organic HAP contained in them. ( f) Calculate the total volume of coating solids used. Determine the total volume of coating solids used which is the combined volume of coating solids for all the coatings used during each month, using Equation 2 of this section.

V Vol V Eq st c i i m s i = ( )( )

=   , , ( .

1 2)

Where: Vst = total volume of coating solids used during the month, liters. Volc, i = total volume of coating, i, used during the month, liters. Vs, i = volume fraction of coating solids for coating, i, liter solids per liter coating, determined according to § 63.3541( b). m = number of coatings used during the month. ( g) Calculate the organic HAP emission rate. Calculate the organic HAP emission rate for the 12 month compliance period, kg organic HAP per liter coating solids used, using Equation 3 of this section.

H H V Eq yr e y st y = =

=

  1 12 1 12 ( . 3)

Where: Hyr = organic HAP emission rate for the 12 month compliance period, kg organic HAP per liter coating solids. He = total mass of organic HAP emissions, kg, from all materials used during month, y, as calculated by Equation 1 of this section. Vst = total volume of coating solids, liters, used during month, y, as calculated by Equation 2 of this section. y = identifier for months. ( h) Compliance demonstration. The organic HAP emission rate for the initial 12 month compliance period, Hyr, must be less than or equal to the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490. You must keep all records as required by § § 63.3530 and 63.3531. As part of the Notification of Compliance Status required by § 63.3510, you must identify the coating operation( s) for which you used the emission rate without add on controls option and submit a statement that the coating operation( s) was ( were) in compliance with the emission limitations during the initial compliance period because the organic HAP emission rate was less than or equal to the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490, determined according to this section. ( i) Alternative calculation of overall subcategory emission limit ( OSEL). Alternatively, if your affected source applies coatings in more than one coating type segment within a subcategory, you may calculate an overall HAP emission limit for the subcategory using Equation 4 of this section. If you use this approach, you must limit organic HAP emissions to the atmosphere to the OSEL specified by Equation 4 of this section during each 12 month compliance period.

OSEL L V V Eq i i i n i i n = =

=

  ( )

( . 1 1 4) Where: OSEL = total allowable organic HAP in kg HAP/ liter coating solids ( pound ( lb) HAP/ gal solids) that can be emitted to the atmosphere from all coating type segments in the subcategory. Li = HAP emission limit for coating type segment i from Table 1 for a new or reconstructed source or Table 2 for an existing source, kg HAP/ liter coating solids ( lb HAP/ gal solids). Vi = total volume of coating solids in liters ( gal) for all coatings in coating type segment i used during the 12 month compliance period. n = number of coating type segments within one subcategory being used at the affected source. You must use the OSEL determined by Equation 4 throughout the 12 month compliance period and may not switch between compliance with individual coating type limits and an OSEL. You may not include coatings in different subcategories in determining your OSEL by this approach. You must keep all records as required by § § 63.3530 and 63.3531. As part of the Notification of Compliance Status required by § 63.3510, you must identify the subcategory for which you used a calculated OSEL and submit a statement that the coating operation( s) was ( were) in compliance with the emission limitations during the initial compliance period because the organic HAP emission rate for the subcategory was less than or equal to the OSEL determined according to this section.

§ 63.3552 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission limitations?

( a) To demonstrate continuous compliance, the organic HAP emission rate for each compliance period, determined according to § 63.3551( a) through ( g), must be less than or equal to the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490. Alternatively, if you calculate an OSEL for all coating type segments within a subcategory according to § 63.3551( i), the organic HAP emission rate for the subcategory for each compliance period must be less than or equal to the calculated OSEL. You must use the calculated OSEL throughout each compliance period. A compliance period consists of 12 months. Each month after the end of the initial compliance period described in § 63.3550 is the end of a compliance period consisting of that month and the preceding 11 months. You must perform the calculations in § 63.4551( a) through ( g) on a monthly basis using data from the previous 12 months of operation.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 04 Jan 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 15JAP2. SGM 15JAP2 EP15JA03.004</ GPH> EP15JA03.005</ MATH> EP15JA03.006</ MATH> 2142 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules ( b) If the organic HAP emission rate for any 12 month compliance period exceeded the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490 or the OSEL calculated according to § 63.3551( i), this is a deviation from the emission limitations for that compliance period and must be reported as specified in § § 63.3510( c)( 6) and 63.3520( a)( 6). ( c) As part of each semiannual compliance report required by § 63.3520, you must identify the coating operation( s) for which you used the emission rate without add on controls option. If there were no deviations from the emission limitations, you must submit a statement that the coating operation( s) was ( were) in compliance with the emission limitations during the reporting period because the organic HAP emission rate for each compliance period was less than or equal to the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490 determined according to § 63.3551( a) through ( g), or using the OSEL calculated according to § 63.3551( i). ( d) You must maintain records as specified in § § 63.3530 and 63.3531.

Compliance Requirements for the Emission Rate With Add On Controls Option § 63.3560 By what date must I conduct performance tests and other initial compliance demonstrations? ( a) New and reconstructed affected sources. For a new or reconstructed affected source, you must meet the requirements of paragraphs ( a)( 1) through ( 4) of this section. ( 1) All emission capture systems, addon control devices, and CPMS must be installed and operating no later than the applicable compliance date specified in § 63.3483. Except for solvent recovery systems for which you conduct liquidliquid material balances according to § 63.3561( j), you must conduct a performance test of each capture system and add on control device according to § § 63.3564, 63.3565, and 63.3566 and establish the operating limits required by § 63.3492 no later than 180 days after the applicable compliance date specified in § 63.3483. For a solvent recovery system for which you conduct liquid liquid material balances according to § 63.3561( j), you must initiate the first material balance no later than the applicable compliance date specified in § 63.3483. ( 2) You must develop and begin implementing the work practice plan required by § 63.3493 no later than the compliance date specified in § 63.3483. ( 3) You must complete the initial compliance demonstration for the initial compliance period according to the requirements of § 63.3561. The initial compliance period begins on the applicable compliance date specified in § 63.3483 and ends on the last day of the 12th month following the compliance date. If the compliance date occurs on any day other than the first day of a month, then the initial compliance period extends through the end of that month plus the next 12 months. You must determine the mass of organic HAP emissions and volume of coating solids used each month and then calculate a 12 month organic HAP emission rate at the end of the initial 12 month compliance period. The initial compliance demonstration includes the results of emission capture system and add on control device performance tests conducted according to § § 63.3564, 63.3565, and 63.3566, results of liquidliquid material balances conducted according to § 63.3561( j), calculations according to § 63.3561 and supporting documentation showing that, during the initial compliance period, the organic HAP emission rate was equal to or less than the emission limit in § 63.3490( a), the operating limits established during the performance tests and the results of the continuous parameter monitoring required by § 63.3568, and documentation of whether you developed and implemented the work practice plan required by § 63.3493. ( 4) You do not need to comply with the operating limits for the emission capture system and add on control device required by § 63.3492 until after you have completed the performance tests specified in paragraph ( a)( 1) of this section. Instead, you must maintain a log detailing the operation and maintenance of the emission capture system, add on control device, and continuous parameter monitors during the period between the compliance date and the performance test. You must begin complying with the operating limits for your affected source on the date you complete the performance tests specified in paragraph ( a)( 1) of this section. The requirements in this paragraph do not apply to solvent recovery systems for which you conduct liquid liquid material balances according to the requirements in § 63.3561( j). ( b) Existing affected sources. For an existing affected source, you must meet the requirements of paragraphs ( b)( 1) through ( 3) of this section. ( 1) All emission capture systems, addon control devices, and CPMS must be installed and operating no later than the applicable compliance date specified in § 63.3483. Except for solvent recovery systems for which you conduct liquidliquid material balances according to § 63.3561( j), you must conduct a performance test of each capture system and add on control device according to the procedures in § § 63.3564, 63.3565, and 63.3566 and establish the operating limits required by § 63.3492 no later than the compliance date specified in § 63.3483. For a solvent recovery system for which you conduct liquid liquid material balances according to § 63.3561( j), you must initiate the first material balance no later than the compliance date specified in § 63.3483. ( 2) You must develop and begin implementing the work practice plan required by § 63.3493 no later than the compliance date specified in § 63.3483. ( 3) You must complete the initial compliance demonstration for the initial compliance period according to the requirements of § 63.3561. The initial compliance period begins on the applicable compliance date specified in § 63.3483 and ends on the last day of the 12th month following the compliance date. If the compliance date occurs on any day other than the first day of a month, then the initial compliance period extends through the end of that month plus the next 12 months. You must determine the mass of organic HAP emissions and volume of coating solids used each month and then calculate a 12 month organic HAP emission rate at the end of the initial 12 month compliance period. The initial compliance demonstration includes the results of emission capture system and add on control device performance tests conducted according to § § 63.3564, 63.3565, and 63.3566, results of liquidliquid material balances conducted according to § 63.3561( j), calculations according to § 63.3561 and supporting documentation showing that during the initial compliance period the organic HAP emission rate was equal to or less than the emission limit in § 63.3490( b), the operating limits established during the performance tests and the results of the continuous parameter monitoring required by § 63.3568, and documentation of whether you developed and implemented the work practice plan required by § 63.3493.

§ 63.3561 How do I demonstrate initial compliance? ( a) You may use the emission rate with add on controls option for any coating operation, for any group of coating operations within a subcategory or coating type segment, or for all of the coating operations within a subcategory or coating type segment. You may include both controlled and uncontrolled coating operations in a group for which you use this option. You must use either the compliant material option, the emission rate VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 04 Jan 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 15JAP2. SGM 15JAP2 2143 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules without add on controls option, or the control efficiency/ outlet concentration option for any coating operation in the affected source for which you do not use the emission rate with add on controls option. To demonstrate initial compliance, the coating operation( s) for which you use the emission rate with add on controls option must meet the applicable emission limitations in § 63.3490. You must conduct a separate initial compliance demonstration for each one and two piece draw and iron can body coating, sheet coating, threepiece can body assembly coating, and end lining affected source. You must meet all the requirements of this section to demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limitations. When calculating the organic HAP emission rate according to this section, do not include any coatings or thinners used on coating operations for which you use the compliant material option, the emission rate without add on controls option, or the control efficiency/ outlet concentration option. You do not need to redetermine the mass of organic HAP in coatings or thinners that have been reclaimed on site and reused in the coating operation( s) for which you use the emission rate with add on controls option. ( b) Compliance with operating limits. Except as provided in § 63.3560( a)( 4) and except for solvent recovery systems for which you conduct liquid liquid material balances according to the requirements of § 63.3561( j), you must establish and demonstrate continuous compliance during the initial compliance period with the operating limits required by § 63.3492 using the procedures specified in § § 63.3567 and 63.3568. ( c) Compliance with work practice requirements. You must develop, implement, and document your implementation of the work practice plan required by § 63.3493 during the initial compliance period, as specified in § 63.3530. ( d) Compliance with emission limits. You must follow the procedures in paragraphs ( e) through ( n) of this section to demonstrate compliance with the applicable emission limit in § 63.3490. ( e) Determine the mass fraction of organic HAP, density, volume used, and volume fraction of coating solids. Follow the procedures specified in § 63.3551( a) through ( d) to determine the mass fraction of organic HAP, density, and volume of each coating and thinner used during each month and the volume fraction of coating solids for each coating used during each month. ( f) Calculate the total mass of organic HAP emissions before add on controls. Using Equation 1 of § 63.3551, calculate the total mass of organic HAP emissions before add on controls from all coatings and thinners used during each month in the coating operation or group of coating operations for which you use the emission rate with add on controls option. ( g) Calculate the organic HAP emission reduction for each controlled coating operation. Determine the mass of organic HAP emissions reduced for each controlled coating operation during each month. The emission reduction determination quantifies the total organic HAP emissions that pass through the emission capture system and are destroyed or removed by the add on control device. Use the procedures in paragraph ( h) of this section to calculate the mass of organic HAP emission reduction for each controlled coating operation using an emission capture system and add on control device other than a solvent recovery system for which you conduct liquid liquid material balances. For each controlled coating operation using a solvent recovery system for which you conduct a liquid liquid material balance, use the procedures in paragraph ( j) of this section to calculate the organic HAP emission reduction. ( h) Calculate the organic HAP emission reduction for each controlled coating operation not using liquid liquid material balances. For each controlled coating operation using an emission capture system and add on control device other than a solvent recovery system for which you conduct liquidliquid material balances, calculate the organic HAP emission reduction, using Equation 1 of this section. The calculation applies the emission capture system efficiency and add on control device efficiency to the mass of organic HAP contained in the coatings and thinners that are used in the coating operation served by the emission capture system and add on control device during each month. Equation 1 of this section accounts for any period of time a deviation specified in § 63.3563( c) or ( d) occurs in the controlled coating operation, including a deviation during a period of startup, shutdown, or malfunction during which you must assume zero efficiency for the emission capture system and add on control device.

H A B R CE DRE T T T Eq c c c w op dev op = +   ×                       ( (. 100 100 1)

Where:

HC = mass of organic HAP emission reduction for the controlled coating operation during the month, kg. AC = total mass of organic HAP in the coatings used in the controlled coating operation during the month, kg, as calculated in Equation 1A of this section. BC = total mass of organic HAP in the thinners used in the controlled coating operation during the month, kg, as calculated in Equation 1B of this section. RW = total mass of organic HAP in waste materials sent or designated for shipment to a hazardous waste TSDF for treatment or disposal during the month, kg, determined according to § 63.3551( e)( 4). CE = capture efficiency of the emission capture system vented to the add on control device, percent. Use the test methods and procedures specified in § § 63.3564 and 63.3565 to measure and record capture efficiency. DRE = organic HAP destruction or removal efficiency of the add on control device, percent. Use the test methods and procedures in § § 63.3564 and 63.3566 to measure and record the organic HAP destruction or removal efficiency. Top = total time period of operation of controlled coating operation during the month, hours. Tdev = total time period of deviations for controlled coating operation during the month, hours. ( 1) Calculate the mass of organic HAP in the coatings used in the controlled coating operation, kg, using Equation 1A of this section.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 04 Jan 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 15JAP2. SGM 15JAP2 EP15JA03.007</ MATH> 2144 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules A Vol D W Eq C ci ci ci i m = ( )( )( )

=   , , , ( . 1A)

1 Where: AC = total mass of organic HAP in the coatings used in the controlled coating operation during the month, kg. Volc, i = total volume of coating, i, used during the month, liters. Dc, i = density of coating, i, kg per liter. Wc, i = mass fraction of organic HAP in coating, i, kg per kg. m = number of different coatings used. ( 2) Calculate the mass of organic HAP in the thinners used in the controlled coating operation, kg, using Equation 1B of this section.

B Vol D W Eq C tj tj tj j n = ( )( )( )

=   , , , ( . 1B)

1 Where: BC = total mass of organic HAP in the thinners used in the controlled coating operation during the month, kg. Volt, j = total volume of thinner, j, used during the month, liters. Dt, j = density of thinner, j, kg per liter thinner. Wt, j = mass fraction of organic HAP in thinner, j, kg organic HAP per kg thinner. n = number of different thinners used. ( i) [ Reserved] ( j) Calculate the organic HAP emission reduction for each controlled coating operation using liquid liquid material balances. For each controlled coating operation using a solvent recovery system for which you conduct liquid liquid material balances, calculate the organic HAP emission reduction by applying the volatile organic matter collection and recovery efficiency to the mass of organic HAP contained in the coatings and thinners that are used in the coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system during each month. Perform a liquid liquid material balance for each month as specified in paragraphs ( j)( 1) through ( 6) of this section. Calculate the mass of organic HAP emission reduction by the solvent recovery system as specified in paragraph ( j)( 7) of this section. ( 1) For each solvent recovery system, install, calibrate, maintain, and operate according to the manufacturer's specifications, a device that indicates the cumulative amount of volatile organic matter recovered by the solvent recovery system each month. The device must be initially certified by the manufacturer to be accurate to within ± 2.0 percent of the mass of volatile organic matter recovered. ( 2) For each solvent recovery system, determine the mass of volatile organic matter recovered for the month, kg, based on measurement with the device required in paragraph ( j)( 1) of this section. ( 3) Determine the mass fraction of volatile organic matter for each coating and thinner used in the coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system during the month, kg volatile organic matter per kg coating. You may determine the volatile organic matter mass fraction using Method 24 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, or an EPA approved alternative method, or you may use information provided by the manufacturer or supplier of the coating. In the event of any inconsistency between information provided by the manufacturer or supplier and the results of Method 24 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, or an approved alternative method, the test method results will govern. ( 4) Determine the density of each coating and thinner used in the coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system during the month, kg per liter, according to § 63.3551( c). ( 5) Measure the volume of each coating, thinner, and cleaning material used in the coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system during the month, liters. ( 6) Each month, calculate the solvent recovery system's volatile organic matter collection and recovery efficiency, using Equation 2 of this section.

R M Vol D WV Eq V VR i m j j tj j n = ( )( )( )+ ( )( )( ) = =     100 1 1 Vol D WV 2)

i i c, i , ( .

Where: RV = volatile organic matter collection and recovery efficiency of the solvent recovery system during the month, percent. MVR = mass of volatile organic matter recovered by the solvent recovery system during the month, kg. Voli = volume of coating, i, used in the coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system during the month, liters. Di = density of coating, i, kg per liter. WVc, i = mass fraction of volatile organic matter for coating, i, kg volatile organic matter per kg coating. Volj = volume of thinner, j, used in the coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system during the month, liters. Dj = density of thinner, j, kg per liter. WVt, j = mass fraction of volatile organic matter for thinner, j, kg volatile organic matter per kg thinner. m = number of different coatings used in the coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system during the month. n = number of different thinners used in the coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system during the month.

( 7) Calculate the mass of organic HAP emission reduction for the coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system during the month, using Equation 3 of this section.

H A B R Eq CSR CSR CSR v = + ( )         100 ( . 3)

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 04 Jan 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\ FR\ FM\ 15JAP2. SGM 15JAP2 EP15JA03.008</ MATH> EP15JA03.009</ MATH> EP15JA03.010</ GPH> EP15JA03.011</ GPH> 2145 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules Where: HCSR = mass of organic HAP emission reduction for the coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system using a liquid liquid material balance during the month, kg. ACSR = total mass of organic HAP in the coatings used in the coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system, kg, calculated using Equation 3A of this section. BCSR = total mass of organic HAP in the thinners used in the coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system, kg, calculated using Equation 3B of this section. RV = volatile organic matter collection and recovery efficiency of the solvent recovery system, percent, from Equation 2 of this section. ( i) Calculate the mass of organic HAP in the coatings used in the coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system, kg, using Equation 3A of this section.

A Vol D W ( Eq. 3A) CSR c, i c, i c, i m = ( )( )( )

=

i 1 Where:

ACSR = total mass of organic HAP in the coatings used in the coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system during the month, kg. Volc, i = total volume of coating, i, used during the month in the coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system, liters. Dc, i = density of coating, i, kg per liter. Wc, i = mass fraction of organic HAP in coating, i, kg per kg. m = number of different coatings used.

( ii) Calculate the mass of organic HAP in the thinners used in the coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system, using Equation 3B of this section.

B Vol D W ( Eq. 3B) CSR t, j t, j t, j n = ( )( )( )

=

j 1 Where: BCSR = total mass of organic HAP in the thinners used in the coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system during the month, kg. Volt, j = total volume of thinner, j, used during the month in the coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system, liters. Dt, j = density of thinner, j, kg per liter. Wt, j = mass fraction of organic HAP in thinner, j, kg per kg. n = number of different thinners used. ( k) Calculate the total volume of coating solids used. Determine the total volume of coating solids used which is the combined volume of coating solids for all the coatings used during each month in the coating operation or group of coating operations for which you use the emission rate with add on controls option, using Equation 2 of § 63.3551. ( l) Calculate the mass of organic HAP emissions for each month. Determine the mass of organic HAP emissions during each month, using Equation 4 of this section.

H H H H ( Eq. 4) HAP e c, i CSR, j j= 1 r i= 1 q =   ( )  ( )

Where: HHAP = total mass of organic HAP emissions for the month, kg. He = total mass of organic HAP emissions before add on controls from all the coatings and thinners used during the month, kg, determined according to paragraph ( f) of this section. HC, i = total mass of organic HAP emission reduction for controlled coating operation, i, not using a liquid liquid material balance, during the month, kg, from Equation 1 of this section. HCSR, j = total mass of organic HAP emission reduction for coating operation, j, controlled by a solvent recovery system using a liquidliquid material balance, during the month, kg, from Equation 3 of this section. q = number of controlled coating operations not using a liquid liquid material balance. r = number of coating operations controlled by a solvent recovery system using a liquid liquid material balance. ( m) Calculate the organic HAP emission rate for the 12 month compliance period. Determine the organic HAP emission rate for the 12 month compliance period, kg organic HAP per liter coating solids used, using Equation 5 of this section.

H H V ( Eq. 5) annual HAP, y y= 1 st, y y= 1 =