[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20794-20796]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07481]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0317; Airspace Docket No. 21-AAL-63]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Modification of Class D and E Airspace, and Proposed
Removal of Class E Airspace; King Salmon Airport, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify the Class D and Class E surface
area airspace, and the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at King Salmon Airport, King Salmon, AK.
Additionally, the FAA proposes to remove the Class E airspace
designated as an extension to Class D or Class E airspace, as it is no
longer required. Furthermore, this action proposes to remove a
navigational aid (NAVAID) from the legal description of the Class E5
text header. Lastly, this action proposes administrative updates to the
Class D and Class E legal descriptions. These actions will ensure the
safety and management of instrument flight rules (IFR) and visual
flight rules (VFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 23, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; telephone:
1-800-647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2022-0317; Airspace Docket No. 21-AAL-63, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathan A. Chaffman, Federal Aviation
Administration, Western Service Center, Operations Support Group, 2200
S 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority,
as it would modify Class D and Class E airspace at King Salmon Airport,
AK, to support IFR operations at the airport.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Persons wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2022-0317;
Airspace Docket No. 21-AAL-63''. The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking

documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Center, Operations Support Group, 2200 S 216th Street, Des Moines, WA
98198.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10, 2021, and effective
September 15, 2021. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F
lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service
routes, and reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 by modifying
the Class D and Class E surface airspace, modifying the Class E
airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface, and removing
the Class E4 airspace designated as a Class D or Class E2 surface area
extension at King Salmon Airport, King Salmon, AK.
    Both the Class D and Class E surface areas require an increase in
radius to properly contain departures until reaching 700 feet above the
surface, contain IFR arrivals descending below 1,000 feet above the
surface, and to contain circling maneuvers at the airport. In addition,
an extension to the Class D and Class E surface areas is needed to the
southeast of the airport due to rising terrain. This proposed extension
would contain IFR departures until reaching 700 feet above the surface.
    In addition, the FAA proposes a shelf be added to the Class D and
Class E surface areas. The shelf will allow for floatplane operations
to and from the Naknek River when weather is below VFR minimums at the
airport.
    The King Salmon Class E4 airspace, designated as an extension to
Class D and Class E surface areas, is no longer needed and the FAA
proposes to remove the airspace.
    The FAA proposes to modify the Class E airspace extending upward
from 700 feet at King Salmon Airport. The current radius, which
contains departing aircraft until reaching 1,200 feet above ground
level (AGL), should be reduced, as the extra coverage is not needed.
The areas to the southeast and northwest of the airport should be
reduced to more appropriately contain the points at which an arriving
aircraft would normally descend below 1,500 AGL.
    The FAA proposes to increase the ceiling of the airspace to 2,600
feet mean sea level (MSL) to account for the 73 foot airport elevation.
Class D areas should normally extend upward from the surface up to and
including 2,500 feet AGL. The altitude must be converted to MSL and
rounded to the nearest 100 feet.
    Furthermore, this action also proposes to remove the King Salmon
VORTAC from the Class E5 text header and the airspace description. The
NAVAID is not required to describe the airspace area, and the removal
of the NAVAID simplifies the airspace's legal description.
    Finally, the FAA proposes several administrative modifications to
the King Salmon Airport legal descriptions. The City name should be
removed from the second line of the Class D, Class E2, and Class E5
airspace legal descriptions. The second line should read: ``King Salmon
Airport, AK.'' Additionally, the current Class D and Class E surface
area legal descriptions require modification to replace the use of the
phrases ``Notice to Airmen'' and ``Airport/Facility Directive.'' These
phrases should read ``Notice to Air Missions'' and ``Chart
Supplement,'' respectively, in both legal descriptions.
    Class D, Class E2, Class E4 and Class E5 airspace designations are
published in paragraphs 5000, 6002, 6004, and 6005, respectively, of
FAA Order JO 7400.11F, dated August 10, 2021, and effective September
15, 2021, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class
E airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in FAA Order JO 7400.11.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial, and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

AAL AK D King Salmon, AK [Amended]

King Salmon Airport, AK
    (Lat. 58[deg]40'35'' N, long. 156[deg]38'55'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
2,600 feet MSL within a 5.3-mile radius of the King Salmon Airport,
AK, and within 1.1 miles each side of the 132[deg] bearing extending
from the 5.3-mile radius to 6.2 miles southeast of the airport,
excluding that airspace 600 feet MSL

and below within 1.5 miles each side of the 132[deg] bearing
extending from the 4.4-mile radius to the 5.3-mile radius of the
airport, and excluding that airspace 600 feet MSL and below within
1.1 miles each side of the 132[deg] bearing extending from the 5.3-
mile radius to 6.2 miles southeast of the airport. This Class D
airspace area is effective during the specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to Air Missions. The effective
date and time will thereafter be continuously published in the Chart
Supplement.

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

AAL AK E2 King Salmon, AK [Amended]

King Salmon Airport, AK
    (Lat. 58[deg]40'35'' N, long. 156[deg]38'55'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within a 5.3-
mile radius of the King Salmon Airport, AK, and within 1.1 miles
each side of the 132[deg] bearing extending from the 5.3-mile radius
to 6.2 miles southeast of the airport, and excluding that airspace
600 feet MSL and below within 1.5 miles each side of the 132[deg]
bearing extending from the 4.4-mile radius to the 5.3-mile radius of
the airport, and excluding that airspace 600 feet MSL and below
within 1.1 miles each side of the 132[deg] bearing extending from
the 5.3-mile radius to 6.2 miles southeast of the airport. This
Class E airspace area is effective during the specific dates and
times established in advance by a Notice to Air Missions. The
effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in
the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as an Extension to
a Class D or Class E Surface Area.

* * * * *

AAL AK E4 King Salmon, AK [Removed]

King Salmon Airport, AK
    (Lat. 58[deg]40'35'' N, long. 156[deg]38'55'' W)

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AAL AK E5 King Salmon, AK [Amended]

King Salmon Airport, AK
    (Lat. 58[deg]40'35'' N, long. 156[deg]38'55'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.8-mile radius of King Salmon Airport, AK, and within 3.3
miles northeast and 3.2 miles southwest of the 132[deg] bearing
extending from the 6.8-mile radius to 9.1 miles southeast of the
airport, and within 3.9 miles each side of the 312[deg] bearing
extending from the 6.8-mile radius to 13.8 miles northwest of the
airport; and that airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above
the surface within a 73-mile radius of the King Salmon Airport, AK,
excluding that airspace extending beyond 12 miles of the shoreline.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on April 4, 2022.
B.G. Chew,
Acting Group Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2022-07481 Filed 4-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7262-7264]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00779]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R10-OAR-2019-0640, FRL-10004-29-Region 10]

Air Plan Approval; OR; Emission Standard Definition Rule Revision

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to approve
a revision to the Oregon State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted on
September 5, 2019. The submission revises the SIP to incorporate by
reference a more recent update to the emission standards for specific
industries by defining the specific Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
edition referenced throughout the revised rule. The EPA is also
proposing to make non-substantive revisions to the SIP to correct
typographical errors. The EPA reviewed the submitted revision and
proposes to find it consistent with Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 9, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R10-
OAR-2019-0640, at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not electronically submit any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christi Duboiski, EPA Region 10, 1200
Sixth Avenue--Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101, at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, it means the EPA.

I. Background

    Each state has a State Implementation Plan (SIP) containing the
control measures and strategies used to attain and maintain the
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) established by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the criteria pollutants
(carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter,
sulfur dioxide). The SIP contains such elements as air pollution
control regulations, emission inventories, attainment demonstrations,
and enforcement mechanisms. Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
requires each state to periodically revise its SIP. As a result, the
SIP is a living compilation of regulatory and non-regulatory elements
that are updated to address Federal requirements and changing air
quality issues in the state.
    Air quality regulations for the State of Oregon (``Oregon'' or
``the State'') are found in Chapter 340 of the Oregon Administrative
Rules (OAR) and are generally implemented by the Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality (ODEQ). On July 18, 2019, the State adopted new
and revised air quality regulations that became effective July 19,
2019. Most of the adopted regulations implement Oregon's air quality
regulations concerning municipal solid waste landfills established in
OAR Chapter 340, Division 236. One of the regulations adopted in the
State rulemaking package (OAR<PHONE_NUMBER> Definitions) made changes to
the Federally approved rules in the Oregon SIP.

II. Evaluation of Submission

A. Division 236: Emission Standards for Specific Industries

    Division 236 contains emission standards for specific industries
and the definitions that apply to this division. On September 5, 2019,
Oregon submitted to the EPA OAR<PHONE_NUMBER> Definitions as a rule
amendment related to the adopted new landfill emission rules.
Specifically OAR<PHONE_NUMBER>(1) was added to clarify the definitions
used in Division 236 by defining the specific Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) edition (July 1, 2018) referenced throughout the
Division. This definition incorporates the specific CFR containing the
EPA's most recent changes to the NSPS for municipal solid waste
landfills and the emissions guidelines for existing landfills codified
in 40 CFR part 60 (August 29, 2016, 81 FR 59276 and 81 FR 59332). In
addition, we note the change renumbers the definitions section of
Division 236.
    The remainder of the State's revision has limited impact on the
Federally-approved Oregon SIP because the revision primarily relates to
municipal solid waste landfill emissions guidelines, which are not part
of the Federally-approved SIP under CAA section 110 and were not
submitted to the EPA for approval. Rather, the municipal solid waste
landfill guidelines are related to section 111(d) of the CAA. For more
details, please see the September 5, 2019 submission in the docket for
this action.
    We reviewed the submitted change to OAR<PHONE_NUMBER> Definitions
and propose to approve and incorporate it by reference into the Oregon
SIP.

III. Corrections to Typographical Errors

    The EPA is proposing to correct minor typographical errors to
provisions previously approved into the Oregon SIP. Specifically, we
are correcting several undesignated center headings and a table heading
in 40 CFR 52.1970(c) to accurately reflect the title of the State
provisions. In addition, we are correcting entry OAR<PHONE_NUMBER> in
section 52.1970(c) to reflect the correct EPA approval date. We are
also correcting a footnote in section 52.1970(c) table 4, approved in
our October 31, 2019 action, to cite to the correct table (84 FR
58327). We note in section 52.1970(e), table 2, entry 011-0010, the
state effective date and approval date are corrected; as well as the
EPA approval date for the Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance
entry in table 5, section 5; and the EPA approval date for the entry of
the PM10 Attainment Plan, La Grande.

IV. Proposed Action

    The EPA proposes to approve, and incorporate by reference into the
Oregon SIP, the submitted change to the following section of the OAR
Chapter 340, Division 236 Emission Standards for Specific Industries,
Section 0010 Definitions, State effective July 19, 2019. The EPA also
proposes to approve the corrected typographical errors as a
``housekeeping'' exercise and proposes that these changes be accurately
reflected in 40 CFR part 52, subpart MM for the State of Oregon.

V. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, the EPA is proposing to include in a final rule,
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference the provisions described in Section IV of this preamble. The
EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally
available through www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the EPA
Region X Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State choices,
provided they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State
law. For that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because it does not involve technical standards; and

     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The proposed SIP would not be approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: January 6, 2020.
Chris Hladick,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2020-00779 Filed 2-6-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


The Environmental Protection Agency is providing this “Reader’s
Guide” to allow the reader to more easily access and navigate the
various documents contained in the carbaryl electronic docket.  The
documents are posted in Federal Docket Management System (FDMS)
electronic docket in   HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov"
www.regulations.gov  under EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0230.  Each item contains the
title of the document, the date of the document, its author(s) when
applicable, and a brief description of its purpose.

EPA is committed to involving stakeholders and the public in its
development of pesticide reregistration and tolerance reassessment
decisions. The Agency's public participation process provides a dynamic
framework for public involvement and consultation during the conduct of
these programs.

Docket Item 1. 	Federal Register Notice:  Pesticide Registration Review;
New Dockets Opened for Review and Comment; Notice of Availability;
September 22, 2010;

This document formally and publicly announces the establishment of,
inter alia, the Carbaryl Registration Review Docket that is available
for review on the Federal Docket Management System’s (FDMS’s)
internet site or at the EPA’s Office of Pesticides Programs’ (paper
copy) Public Docket.  It solicits comments on the carbaryl related
documents and provides timeframes and locations for submitting comments.

Docket Item 2. 	Reader’s Guide to docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0230;
September 22, 2010; Guerry

This document, it is designed to describe the purpose of each document
in the docket.

Docket Item 3.	Carbaryl Summary Document Registration Review: Initial
Docket September 2010; September 17, 2010 Keigwin

Document summarizes what EPA currently knows about the carbaryl
pesticide case and a preliminary work plan for anticipated data and
assessment needs.

Docket Item 4.	Appendix A; December 15, 2009; Biological and Economic
Analysis Division

This report presents EPA’s understanding of the current use and usage
patterns of carbaryl including any limitations or restrictions.

Docket Item 5.	Screening Level Use Analysis (SLUA) for Carbaryl; October
19, 2009; Biological and Economic Analysis Division

This report presents a screening level use estimate of the agricultural
use of the active ingredient carbaryl.

Docket Item 6.	Problem Formulation for the Environmental Fate and
Ecological Risk, Endangered Species, and Drinking Water Assessments in
Support of the Registration Review of Carbaryl; September 8, 2010;
Environmental Fate and Effects Division

Also included as part of the Summary Document, this document summarizes
what EPA currently knows about the environmental fate and effects of the
carbaryl pesticide and includes a preliminary work plan for anticipated
data and assessment needs.

Docket Item 7.	Carbaryl Human Health Assessment Scoping Document in
Support of Registration Review; August 26, 2010; Health Effects Division

Also included as part of the Summary Document, this document summarizes
what EPA currently knows about the human health effects of the carbaryl
pesticide and includes a preliminary work plan for anticipated data and
assessment needs.

Docket Item 8.	Carbaryl: Review of Human Incidents; May 20, 2010; Health
Effects Division

Also included as part of the Summary Document, this document summarizes
the human health incident data that have been reported to the Agency.

Carbaryl Reader’s Guide - Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0230

 PAGE  1


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 16 (Thursday, January 24, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5149-5151]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01317]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0609; Airspace Docket No. 12-AEA-10]

Proposed Amendment of Class D and Class E Airspace; Caldwell, NJ

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class D and Class E Airspace at
Caldwell, NJ, as the Paterson Non-Directional Radio Beacon (NDB) has
been decommissioned and new Standard Instrument Approach Procedures
have been developed at Essex County Airport. This action would enhance
the safety and airspace management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR)
operations at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 11, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001; Telephone: 1-
800-647-5527; Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify the Docket Number
FAA-2012-0609; Airspace Docket No. 12-AEA-10, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit and review received comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O.
Box 20636,

Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and
suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned
regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are specifically invited
on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and
energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2012-0609; Airspace Docket No. 12-AEA-10) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management System (see ``ADDRESSES'' section
for address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Persons wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on
this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket
No. FAA-2012-0609; Airspace Docket No. 12-AEA-10.'' The postcard will
be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded from and
comments submitted through http://www.regulations.gov. Recently
published rulemaking documents can also be accessed through the FAA's
Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
Holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the Eastern Service Center, Federal
Aviation Administration, room 350, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park,
Georgia 30337.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>, to
request a copy of Advisory circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is considering an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to amend Class D airspace and Class E
airspace designated as an extension to Class D surface area, to support
new Standard Instrument Approach Procedures developed at Essex County
Airport, Caldwell, NJ. Airspace reconfiguration is necessary due to the
decommissioning of the Paterson NDB and cancellation of the NDB
approach, and for continued safety and management of IFR operations at
the airport.
    Class D and Class E airspace designations are published in
Paragraph 5000 and 6004, respectively, of FAA Order 7400.9W, dated
August 8, 2012, and effective September 15, 2012, which is incorporated
by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designation listed in
this document will be published subsequently in the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore, (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This proposed rulemaking is promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part, A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under
that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign
the use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This proposed regulation is within the scope
of that authority as it would amend Class D and Class E airspace at
Essex County Airport, Caldwell, NJ.
    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9W, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 8, 2012, effective September 15, 2012, is amended
as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D airspace.

* * * * *

AEA NJ D Caldwell, NJ [Amended]

Essex County Airport, Caldwell, NJ
    (Lat. 40[deg]52'30'' N., long. 74[deg]16'53'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface up to and
including 2,700 feet MSL within a 4.1-mile radius of Essex County
Airport, excluding the portion that coincides with Morristown, NJ
Class D airspace area.. This Class D airspace area is effective
during specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice
to Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be
continuously published in the Airport/Facility Directory.

Paragraph 6004 Class E airspace designated as an extension to a
class D surface area.

* * * * *

AEA NJ E4 Caldwell, NJ [Amended]

Essex County Airport, Caldwell, NJ
    (Lat. 40[deg]52'30'' N., long. 74[deg]16'53'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 2 miles
each side of a 030[deg] bearing from the Essex County Airport,
extending from the 4.1-mile radius of the airport to 7 miles
northeast of the airport. This Class E airspace area is effective
during the specific dates and times established in advance by a
Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be
continuously published in the Airport/Facility Directory.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on December 12, 2012.
Barry A. Knight,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2013-01317 Filed 1-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P