[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 161 (Monday, August 20, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50070-50071]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20266]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[EPA-HQ-SFUND-1983-0002; FRL-9718-3]

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List: Deletion of the Hooker (Hyde Park) Superfund
Site

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 2 is issuing
a Notice of Intent to Delete the Hooker (Hyde Park) Superfund Site
(Site) located in Niagara Falls, New York, from the National Priorities
List (NPL) and requests public comments on this proposed action. The
NPL, promulgated pursuant to section 105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of
1980, as amended, is an appendix of the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and the State of
New York, through the Department of Environmental Conservation, have
determined that all appropriate response actions under CERCLA, other
than operation, maintenance, and five-year reviews, have been
completed. However, this deletion does not preclude future actions
under Superfund.

DATES: Comments must be received by September 19, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-1983-0002, by one of the following methods:
     Web site: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
     Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax: To the attention of Gloria M. Sosa at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Gloria M. Sosa, Remedial Project Manager, Emergency
and Remedial Response Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 2, 290 Broadway, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10007-1866.
     Hand delivery: Superfund Records Center, 290 Broadway,
18th Floor, New York, NY 10007-1866 (telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>). (Monday
to Friday from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.). Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-SFUND-
1983-0002. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or email. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statue. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in the hard
copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2, Superfund Records
Center, 290 Broadway, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10007-1866, Phone: 212-
637-4308, Hours: Monday to Friday from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
U.S. EPA Western NY Public Information Office, 86 Exchange Place,
Buffalo, NY 14204-2026, Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Hours: Monday to
Friday from 8:30 a.m.-4 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gloria M. Sosa, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2, 290 Broadway,
20th Floor, New York, NY 10007-1866, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the ``Rules and Regulations'' Section of
today's Federal Register, we are publishing a direct final Notice of
Deletion of the Hyde Park Landfill Superfund Site without prior Notice
of Intent to Delete because we view this as a noncontroversial revision
and anticipate no adverse comment. We have explained our reasons for
this deletion in the preamble to the direct final Notice of Deletion,
and those reasons are incorporated herein. If we receive no adverse
comment(s) on this deletion action, we will not take further action on
this Notice of Intent to Delete. If we receive adverse comment(s), we
will withdraw the direct final Notice of Deletion, and it will not take
effect. We will, as appropriate, address all public comments in a
subsequent final Notice of Deletion based on this Notice of Intent to
Delete. We will not institute a second comment period on this Notice of
Intent to Delete. Any parties

interested in commenting must do so at this time.
    For additional information, see the direct final Notice of Deletion
which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR
2923; 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.

    Dated: August 9, 2012.
Judith A. Enck,
Regional Administrator, EPA, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 2012-20266 Filed 8-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 31, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 53421-53424]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18750]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1065; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-00280-T]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-2A12 airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by a report that the flightcrew and passenger
oxygen system's refill and capillary lines may have been contaminated
by sealant and cotton fibers. This proposed AD would require an
inspection to determine the serial numbers of the oxygen cylinders
installed and replacement of each affected oxygen cylinder and
regulator assembly (OCRA). The FAA is proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 17,
2022.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Bombardier
Business Aircraft Customer Response Center, 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road
West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email bombardier.com">[email protected]bombardier.com; internet bombardier.com. You may view
this service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-
231-3195.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-1065; or in person at Docket
Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, the mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments received, and
other information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed
above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gabriel Kim, Aerospace Engineer,
Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services Section, FAA, New York
ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2022-1065; Project Identifier
MCAI-2022-00280-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
the proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to
Gabriel Kim, Aerospace Engineer, Mechanical Systems and Administrative
Services Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is not
specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for
this rulemaking.

Background

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued TCCA AD CF-2022-07, dated March 1,
2022 (TCCA AD CF-2022-07) (also referred to after this as the MCAI), to
correct an unsafe condition for certain Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-
2A12 airplanes. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at
regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-1065.
    This proposed AD was prompted by a report that the flightcrew and
passenger oxygen system's refill and capillary lines may have been
contaminated by sealant and cotton fibers. Any contamination is
expected to collect in the OCRA filters. The FAA is proposing this AD
to address the contamination, which may cause a blockage of the oxygen
system components and result in a reduction of oxygen flow, reduce the
total amount of available oxygen, or create a fire hazard. See the MCAI
for additional background information.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Bombardier has issued Service Bulletin 700-35-7502, dated January
26, 2022. This service information describes procedures for an
inspection to determine the serial numbers of the oxygen cylinders
installed and replacement of each affected OCRA with a new or reworked
OCRA. This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority,
the FAA has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
and service information referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD
because the FAA evaluated all the relevant information and determined
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop
on other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information already described.

Difference Between This NPRM and the MCAI

    Although TCCA AD CF-2022-07 does not specify prohibiting the
installation of any affected oxygen cylinder having certain serial
numbers on any airplane, this proposed AD would include such a
prohibition.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 16 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following
costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 work-hours x $85 per hour = $425...........................          $3,069           $3,494          $55,904
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate.
According to the manufacturer, however, some or all of the costs of
this proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the
cost impact on affected operators.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2022-1065; Project Identifier MCAI-
2022-00280-T.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by October 17, 2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-2A12
airplanes, certificated in any category, having serial numbers
70006, 70008, 70009 through 70016 inclusive, 70019, 70020, 70025,
70026, 70028, 70032 through 70035 inclusive, 70038 through 70043
inclusive, 70046, 70048, 70050, 70051, 70054, 70063, and 70073.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 35, Oxygen.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report that the flightcrew and
passenger oxygen system's refill and capillary lines may have been
contaminated by sealant and cotton fibers. The FAA is issuing this
AD to address the contamination, which may cause a blockage of the
oxygen system components and result in a reduction of oxygen flow,
reduce the total amount of available oxygen, or create a fire
hazard.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Inspection and Replacement

    Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD: Do an
inspection to determine the serial numbers of the oxygen cylinders
installed in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-35-7502, dated January 26, 2022. If
any affected oxygen cylinder and regulator assembly (OCRA) is
installed, before further flight replace the affected part with a
new or reworked OCRA, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-35-7502, dated
January 26, 2022.

(h) Parts Installation Prohibition

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install any
affected oxygen cylinder having a serial number specified in
paragraph 1.A. of Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-35-7502, dated
January 26, 2022, on any airplane.

(i) No Reporting Requirement

    Although Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-35-7502, dated January
26, 2022, specifies to report certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that requirement.

(j) Additional AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If
sending information directly to the manager of the certification
office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector,

the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or
Bombardier Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If
approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature.

(k) Additional Information

    (1) Refer to TCCA AD CF-2022-07, dated March 1, 2022, for
related information. This TCCA AD may be found in the AD docket on
the internet at regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2022-1065.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Gabriel Kim,
Aerospace Engineer, Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services
Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier Business Aircraft Customer Response Center, 400
C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email bombardier.com">[email protected]bombardier.com; internet
bombardier.com. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued on August 25, 2022.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-18750 Filed 8-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


*Matthew LaPenta;
*Created 02.08.08;

*Modified 10.24.08 revised analysis;
*Modified 02.26.08 add average to output;
*Modified 02.22.08 add distributional information;
*Modified 02.21.08 increase number of samples;
*Modified 02.20.08 increase program efficiency;
*Modified 02.19.08 use revenue bracket-specific numbers of vessels;
*Modified 02.16.08 output naics-firm-specific distributions;
*Modified 02.15.08 output naics-firm-specific distributions;
*Modified 02.12.08 output naics-specific distributions;
*Modified 02.11.08 (developing program);
*Description
	There are 16 low-cost and 21 high-cost practices required of vessels subject to the discharge rule.
		For each individual practice there is a probability that an incremental cost is incurred under a
		rule scenario.  This program calculates the probability that incremental costs are incurred for each
		possible combination of practices (assuming that the probability of incurring incremental costs is
		independent across practices).  The program Calculates the Distribution of Firm Cost Impacts
		by Sector and Revenue Bracket The percentage of firms with impacts exceeding 1% and 3% of their
		revenue is also calculated.  ;
*Drive (c or h);
	%let d=h;
*File Location;
	%let mainloc=H:\Projects\Tyche_Option_1_Task_1-04\SAS Analysis\;
	%let inloc=&mainloc.Inputs\;
	%let outloc=&mainloc.Outputs\;

	*Inputs;
%let input=&inloc.Distribution Analysis Inputs NEW;
*Outputs;
%let samp=101;
%let output=&outloc.DAO&samp._;
%let output2=&outloc.Dist&samp._;
*let output3=&outloc.Dist&samp._;

libname temp "&mainloc.Tempx";
libname temp2 "&mainloc.Tempx\temp2";
libname temp3 "&mainloc.Tempx\temp3";
libname temp4 "&mainloc.Tempx\temp4";

PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=temp   MEMTYPE=DATA    KILL nolist;
QUIT;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=temp2   MEMTYPE=DATA    KILL nolist;
QUIT;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=temp3   MEMTYPE=DATA    KILL nolist;
QUIT;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=temp4   MEMTYPE=DATA    KILL nolist;
QUIT;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA    KILL nolist;
QUIT;
*Begin Program;

*This Macro is used to Import data from excel;
%macro import(infile,sheet,out);
PROC IMPORT OUT= WORK.&out
            DATAFILE= "&infile. &sheet."
            DBMS=CSV REPLACE;
     GETNAMES=YES;
     DATAROW=2;
RUN;
%mend;
*This Macro is used to Export data to excel;
%macro export(datafile,outfile,sheet);

PROC EXPORT DATA= &datafile.
            OUTFILE= "&outfile.&sheet."
            DBMS=CSV REPLACE;
     PUTNAMES=YES;
RUN;

%mend;

%import(&input, naicsnum.csv,num);
data temp2.num;
	set num;
run;

*	1	get thresholds data;
%import(&input, NAICSthresh.csv,th1);
data TEMP2.th2 (keep= NAICS O1-O11 T1-T11);
	set th1 (keep=NAICS A1-A11);
		array A(11) A1-A11;
		array O(11) O1-O11;
		array T(11) T1-T11;
			do i=1 to 11;
				if A(i)>0 then do;
					O(i)=.01*A(i);
					T(i)=.03*A(i);
				end;
			end;
run;

*	2a	Get percentages of vessel types for NAICS (Import);
%import(&input, NAICSWEIGHTS.csv,n1);

*	2b	Get percentages of vessel types for NAICS (drop unneded vars);
data n2;
	set n1;
		if class="Dummy" then delete;
run;

*	2c	Get percentages of vessel types for NAICS (Get total number of vessels by NAICS);
proc sql;
	create table n3 as select
		n2.*,
		number/sum(number) as percent
	from n2 group by NAICS order by NAICS,Class;
quit;

*	2d	Get percentages of vessel types for NAICS (Get percentage for each vessel type);
%macro boat2(class,short,ini);
data x_&ini. (keep=NAICS &ini._percent);
	set n3;
		if Class="&class";
		rename percent=&ini._percent;
run;
%mend;
%boat2(Cruise Ships,Cruise,cs);
%boat2(Commercial Fishing,Comm,cf);
%boat2(Freight Barges,FBarge,fb);
%boat2(Freight Ships,FShips,fs);
%boat2(Passenger Vessels,Pass,pv);
%boat2(Recreational Ships,Rec,rs);
%boat2(Tank Barges,TBarge,tb);
%boat2(Tank Ships,TShips,ts);
%boat2(Utility Vessels,Utility,ut);
*	2c	Get percentages of vessel types for NAICS (Combine data);
data TEMP2.n4;
	merge x_cs x_cf x_fb x_fs x_pv x_rs x_tb x_ts x_ut;
	by NAICS;
run;

*3	Import data from Excel;
%import(&input, infile.csv,d1);

*This macro generates the exact distribution of costs for the various vessel types;
%macro boat(class,short,ini);

*4	Get data for a vessel type defined by macro variable;
data d2;
	set d1;
		if Class="&class";
run;

*5	Redefine the vessel count and the percentage variable, so the vessell count is the same for all practices
		and the percentage is the percentage of all vessels that will incur the costs;
proc sql;
	create table d3 as select
		d2.*,
		max(count) as maxcount,
		count/max(count)*percent as newpercent
	from d2;
quit;

*6 generate a data set for each practice type and format the data set
		Practice_X 	=1 when practice X is used and =0 OTW
		Count_X    	=Number of Vessels of type &class
		percent_X	=Probability of a sceanio
		cost_X		=is the cost of practice X under a scenario (zero when Practice_X 	=0)
			;
%macro divide(est,top);
	%do i=1 %to ⊤
		data x1;
			set d3;
				if estimate="&est" and practice=&i;
				practice_&i		=1;
				count_&i		=maxcount;
				percent_&i		=newpercent;
				cost_&i			=cost;
		run;
		data x2;
			set d3;
				if estimate="&est" and practice=&i;
				practice_&i		=0;
				count_&i		=maxcount;
				percent_&i		=1-newpercent;
				cost_&i			=0;
		run;
		data &est.&i (keep=practice_&i count_&i percent_&i cost_&i);
			set x1 x2;
				if percent_&i~=0;
		run;
	%end;
%mend;
%divide(H,21); *there are 21 high cost practices;
%divide(L,16); *there are 16 low cost practices;

*7	Initialize first data set for cartesian product joins;
data HH1;
	set h1;
run;
data LL1;
	set L1;
run;

*8	This macro performs a series of cartesian product joins of the practice-specific data sets.
		A cartesian product join generates all possible combinations between two datasets;
%macro cartesian(l,h);
proc sql;
	create table HH&h as select
		hh&l..*,h&h..*
	from hh&l.,h&h.;
quit;
proc sql;
	create table LL&h as select
		LL&l..*,l&h..*
	from LL&l.,l&h.;
quit;
%mend;
%cartesian(1,2);
%cartesian(2,3);
%cartesian(3,4);
%cartesian(4,5);
%cartesian(5,6);
%cartesian(6,7);
%cartesian(7,8);
%cartesian(8,9);
%cartesian(9,10);
%cartesian(10,11);
%cartesian(11,12);
%cartesian(12,13);
%cartesian(13,14);
%cartesian(14,15);
%cartesian(15,16)
*9	This macro performs a series of cartesian product joins of the High Cost practice-specific data sets.
		A cartesian product join generates all possible combinations between two datasets;
%macro cartesian2(l,h);
proc sql;
	create table HH&h as select
		hh&l..*,h&h..*
	from hh&l.,h&h.;
quit;
%mend;
%cartesian2(16,17);
%cartesian2(17,18);
%cartesian2(18,19);
%cartesian2(19,20);
%cartesian2(20,21);

*10	(for high cost estimates) Calculate probability of each practice combination.
		Calculate Number of Vessels affected under each practice combination.
		Calculate per-vessel and total cost of each practice combination.
		Drop combinations that are not observed.;
data d4 (compress=yes drop=count_1-count_21);
	set hh21;
		&ini.probability=percent_1*
					percent_2*
					percent_3*
					percent_4*
					percent_5*
					percent_6*
					percent_7*
					percent_8*
					percent_9*
					percent_10*
					percent_11*
					percent_12*
					percent_13*
					percent_14*
					percent_15*
					percent_16*
					percent_17*
					percent_18*
					percent_19*
					percent_20*
					percent_21;
		if &ini.probability~=0;
		&ini.count=count_1*probability;
		&ini.cost=sum(of cost_1-cost_21);
		&ini.totalcost=cost*count;
run;

*11	Format dataset;
data High&short (drop=practice_1-practice_21 i &ini.count &ini.TotalCost Class compress=yes);
	retain Class practice_1-practice_21;* probability count cost TotalCost;
	set d4 (keep = practice_1-practice_21 &ini.probability &ini.count &ini.cost &ini.TotalCost);
	format class $40.;
	Class="&Class";
		array p(21) practice_1-practice_21;
		array ne(21) &ini._1-&ini._21;
			do i=1 to 21;
				ne(i)=p(i);
			end;
run;

*12	(for Low cost estimates) Calculate probability of each practice combination.
		Calculate Number of Vessels affected under each practice combination.
		Calculate per-vessel and total cost of each practice combination.
		Drop combinations that are not observed.;
data d5 (compress=yes drop=count_1-count_16);
	set LL16;
		&ini.probability=percent_1*
					percent_2*
					percent_3*
					percent_4*
					percent_5*
					percent_6*
					percent_7*
					percent_8*
					percent_9*
					percent_10*
					percent_11*
					percent_12*
					percent_13*
					percent_14*
					percent_15*
					percent_16
;
		if &ini.probability~=0;
		&ini.count=count_1*&ini.probability;
		&ini.cost=sum(of cost_1-cost_16);
		&ini.totalcost=&ini.cost*count;
run;

*13	Format dataset;
data Low&short (drop=practice_1-practice_16 i &ini.count &ini.TotalCost Class compress=yes);
	retain practice_1_practice_16;* probability count cost TotalCost;
	set d5 (keep = practice_1-practice_16 &ini.probability &ini.count &ini.cost &ini.TotalCost);
		array p(16) practice_1-practice_16;
		array ne(16) &ini._1-&ini._16;
			do i=1 to 16;
				ne(i)=p(i);
			end;
	format class $40.;
	Class="&Class";
run;

*14 Sort by per-vessel cost;
proc sort data=Low&short; by &ini.cost; run;
proc sort data=High&short; by &ini.cost; run;

*15 Export Data to Excel;
*%export(Low&short,"&output.",Low&short);
*%export(High&short,"&output.",High&short);

*ADD DOCUMENTATION!!;
%macro percentiles(ty);
/*
proc univariate data=&ty.&short. noprint;
			weight &ini.probability;
			output out=&ty.&short.1 PCTLPRE=&ini.C_
				PCTLPTS= 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
				Min=&ini.C_0 Max=&ini.C_100;
			var &ini.Cost;
run;

proc transpose data=&ty.&short.1 out=&ty.&short.2 prefix=&ini.C_ ;
	var &ini.C_0 &ini.C_5 &ini.C_10 &ini.C_15 &ini.C_20 &ini.C_25 &ini.C_30 &ini.C_35
		&ini.C_40 &ini.C_45 &ini.C_50 &ini.C_55 &ini.C_60 &ini.C_65 &ini.C_70 &ini.C_75 &ini.C_80 &ini.C_85 &ini.C_90 &ini.C_95 &ini.C_100;
run;
data temp3.&ty.&short.3 (keep=&ini._Cost compress=Yes);
	set &ty.&short.2;
		rename &ini.C_1=&ini._Cost;
*3;*		if 		_n_=1 | _n_=11 | _n_=21;
*6;*		if 		_n_=1 | _n_=5 | _n_=9 | _n_=13 | _n_=17 | _n_=21;
*11;		if 		_n_=1 | _n_=5 | _n_=9 | _n_=13 | _n_=17 | _n_=21 | 	_n_=3 | _n_=7 | _n_=11 | _n_=15 | _n_=19;
run;
*/
proc univariate data=&ty.&short. noprint;
			weight &ini.probability;
			output out=&ty.&short.1 PCTLPRE=&ini.C_
				PCTLPTS= 	1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
							20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27	28	29
							30	31	32	33	34	35	36	37	38	39
							40	41	42	43	44	45	46	47	48	49
							50	51	52	53	54	55	56	57	58	59
							60	61	62	63	64	65	66	67	68	69
							70	71	72	73	74	75	76	77	78	79
							80	81	82	83	84	85	86	87	88	89
							90	91	92	93	94	95	96	97	98	99
 				Min=&ini.C_0 Max=&ini.C_100;
			var &ini.Cost;
run;
proc transpose data=&ty.&short.1 out=&ty.&short.2 prefix=&ini.C_ ;
	var
&ini.C_0	&ini.C_1	&ini.C_2	&ini.C_3	&ini.C_4	&ini.C_5	&ini.C_6	&ini.C_7	&ini.C_8	&ini.C_9
&ini.C_10	&ini.C_11	&ini.C_12	&ini.C_13	&ini.C_14	&ini.C_15	&ini.C_16	&ini.C_17	&ini.C_18	&ini.C_19
&ini.C_20	&ini.C_21	&ini.C_22	&ini.C_23	&ini.C_24	&ini.C_25	&ini.C_26	&ini.C_27	&ini.C_28	&ini.C_29
&ini.C_30	&ini.C_31	&ini.C_32	&ini.C_33	&ini.C_34	&ini.C_35	&ini.C_36	&ini.C_37	&ini.C_38	&ini.C_39
&ini.C_40	&ini.C_41	&ini.C_42	&ini.C_43	&ini.C_44	&ini.C_45	&ini.C_46	&ini.C_47	&ini.C_48	&ini.C_49
&ini.C_50	&ini.C_51	&ini.C_52	&ini.C_53	&ini.C_54	&ini.C_55	&ini.C_56	&ini.C_57	&ini.C_58	&ini.C_59
&ini.C_60	&ini.C_61	&ini.C_62	&ini.C_63	&ini.C_64	&ini.C_65	&ini.C_66	&ini.C_67	&ini.C_68	&ini.C_69
&ini.C_70	&ini.C_71	&ini.C_72	&ini.C_73	&ini.C_74	&ini.C_75	&ini.C_76	&ini.C_77	&ini.C_78	&ini.C_79
&ini.C_80	&ini.C_81	&ini.C_82	&ini.C_83	&ini.C_84	&ini.C_85	&ini.C_86	&ini.C_87	&ini.C_88	&ini.C_89
&ini.C_90	&ini.C_91	&ini.C_92	&ini.C_93	&ini.C_94	&ini.C_95	&ini.C_96	&ini.C_97	&ini.C_98	&ini.C_99
&ini.C_100
;
run;
data temp3.&ty.&short.3 (keep=&ini._Cost compress=Yes);
	set &ty.&short.2;
		rename &ini.C_1=&ini._Cost;
		*if 		_n_=1 | _n_=5 | _n_=9 | _n_=13 | _n_=17 | _n_=21
			| 	_n_=3 | _n_=7 | _n_=11 | _n_=15 | _n_=19;
run;

%mend;
%percentiles(Low);
%percentiles(High);
%mend;
%boat(Cruise Ships,Cruise,cs);
%boat(Commercial Fishing,Comm,cf);
%boat(Freight Barges,FBarge,fb);
%boat(Freight Ships,FShips,fs);
%boat(Passenger Vessels,Pass,pv);
%boat(Recreational Ships,Rec,rs);
%boat(Tank Barges,TBarge,tb);
%boat(Tank Ships,TShips,ts);
%boat(Utility Vessels,Utility,ut);

*The program Calculates the Distribution of Firm Cost Impacts
		by Sector and Revenue Bracket The percentage of firms with impacts exceeding 1% and 3% of their
		revenue is also calculated.;
%macro NAICS2(vt,sdf,sff,sdp,sif,sip,sss,sph,smc,sns,sot,
dd1,dd1a,dd1b,dd2,dd3,dd4,dd5,dd6,dd7,dd8,dd9,dd10,
wgt1,wgt2,wgt3,wgt4,wgt5,wgt6,wgt7,wgt8,wgt9,wgt10,wgt11);
%macro percentiles2(ty);

PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA    KILL nolist;
QUIT;
proc datasets nolist;
copy in=temp3 out=work;
quit;
run;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=temp   MEMTYPE=DATA    KILL nolist;
QUIT;

&sff		proc sql; *11411	Fin fishing, shell fishing, and other commercial fishing;
&sff		create table TEMP.&ty._FF as select
&sff				"11411" as NAICS format=$20.,
&sff				&ty.Comm3.*
&sff			from &ty.Comm3;
&sff		quit;

&sph		proc sql; *488310	Port and harbor operations;
&sph		create table TEMP.&ty._PH as select
&sph				"488310" as NAICS format=$20.,
&sph				&ty.Utility3.*
&sph			from &ty.Utility3;
&sph		quit;

%macro loopit(in1,in2,top,out);
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete n &out;
QUIT;
%do j=1 %to ⊤
data n;
	set &in2;
	if _N_=&j;
run;
data a&j;
	if _n_=1 then set n;
	set &in1;
run;
proc append base=&out  data=a&j;
run;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete a&j;
QUIT;
%end;
%mend;

&dd1.loopit(&ty.Pass3,&ty.Utility3			,&samp.,d1);
&dd1a.loopit(d1,&ty.Fbarge3					,&samp.,d1a);
&dd1b.loopit(d1,&ty.Tbarge3					,&samp.,d1b);
&dd7.loopit(d1,&ty.cruise3					,&samp.,d7);

&sip		data TEMP.&ty._IP;*483212	Inland waterways passenger transportation and Other water trans;
&sip			set d1;
&sip				format NAICS $20.0;
&sip					NAICS="483212";
&sip		run;

*delete d1;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete d1;
QUIT;

&dd2.loopit(d1a,&ty.FShips3					,&samp.,d2);

*delete d1a;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete d1a;
QUIT;

&dd6.loopit(d1b,&ty.rec3					,&samp.,d6);

*delete d1b;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete d1b;
QUIT;

&sdp		data TEMP.&ty._DP;*483112/483114	Deep Sea/Coastal and Great Lakes Passenger;
&sdp			set d7;
&sdp				format NAICS $20.0;
&sdp					NAICS="483112/483114";
&sdp		run;

*delete d7;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete d7;
QUIT;
&sss		data TEMP.&ty._SS;*487210	Scenic and Sightseeing Transportation, Water;
&sss			set d2;
&sss				format NAICS $20.0;
&sss					NAICS="487210";
&sss		run;

&dd3.loopit(d2,&ty.Tbarge3					,&samp.,d3);

*delete d2;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete d2;
QUIT;

&dd9.loopit(d6,&ty.fSHIPS3					,&samp.,d9);
&dd10.loopit(d6,&ty.fbarge3					,&samp.,d10);

*delete d6;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete d6;
QUIT;

&dd4.loopit(d3,&ty.COMM3					,&samp.,d4);
&dd8.loopit(d3,&ty.TSHIPS3					,&samp.,d8);

*delete d3;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete d3;
QUIT;

&sot		data TEMP.&ty._OT;*488390	Other support activities for water transportation;
&sot			set d9;
&sot				format NAICS $20.0;
&sot					NAICS="488390";
&sot		run;

*delete d9;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete d9;
QUIT;

&sns		data TEMP.&ty._NS;*488330	Navigational services to shipping and salvage;
&sns			set d10;
&sns				format NAICS $20.0;
&sns					NAICS="488330";
&sns		run;

*delete d10;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete d10;
QUIT;

&smc	data TEMP.&ty._MC;*488320	Marine cargo handling;
&smc			set d4;
&smc				format NAICS $20.0;
&smc					NAICS="488320";
&smc		run;

&dd5.loopit(d4,&ty.TSHIPS3					,&samp.,d5);

*delete d4;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete d4;
QUIT;

&sdf		data TEMP.&ty._DF;*483111/483113	Deep Sea/Coastal and Great Lakes Freight;
&sdf			set d8;
&sdf				format NAICS $20.0;
&sdf					NAICS="483111/483113";
&sdf		run;

*delete d8;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete d8;
QUIT;

&sif		data TEMP.&ty._IF; *483211 Inland waterways freight transportation and towing transportation;
&sif			set d5;
&sif				format NAICS $20.0;
&sif					NAICS="488320";
&sif		run;

*delete d5;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete d5;
QUIT;

%mend percentiles2;
%percentiles2(&ptiles);

%macro percentiles3(ty);
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA    KILL nolist;
QUIT;

proc sql;
		create table large2 as select
			large.*,
			n4.cs_percent,n4.cf_percent,n4.fb_percent,n4.fs_percent,n4.pv_percent,n4.rs_percent,
			n4.tb_percent,n4.ts_percent,n4.ut_percent
		from temp.&TY._&vt. as large left join temp2.n4 as n4 on
		n4.NAICS=large.NAICS;
quit;

data large3;
	set large2;
		cost=	sum(cs_percent*cs_cost,
				cf_percent*cf_cost,
				fb_percent*fb_cost,
				fs_percent*fs_cost,
				pv_percent*pv_cost,
				rs_percent*rs_cost,
				tb_percent*tb_cost,
				ts_percent*ts_cost,
				ut_percent*ut_cost);
run;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete large2;
QUIT;
proc sql;
	create table large3a as select
		large3.*,
			m.m1,m.m2,m.m3,m.m4,m.m5,m.m6,m.m7,m.m8,m.m9,m.m10,m.m11
		from large3 left join temp2.num as m on
		large3.NAICS=m.NAICS;
quit;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete large3;
QUIT;
data large3b;
	set large3a;
		array mult(11) m1-m11;
		array acost(11) acost1-acost11;
		DO I=1 TO 11;
			acost(i)=cost*mult(i);
		END;
run;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete large3a;
QUIT;
proc sql;
	create table large4 as select
		l.acost1,l.acost2,l.acost3,l.acost4,l.acost5,l.acost6,l.acost7,l.acost8,l.acost9,l.acost10,l.acost11,
		t.*
	from large3b as l left join temp2.th2 as t
	on t.NAICS=l.NAICS;
quit;
data temp4.large4;
	set large4;
run;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete large3b;
QUIT;

%macro reshapit;
%do l=1 %to 11;
data l&l (keep=Xweight acost);
	set large4;
		acost=acost&l;
		if		"&l"="1" then Xweight=&wgt1;
		else if "&l"="2" then Xweight=&wgt2;
		else if "&l"="3" then Xweight=&wgt3;
		else if "&l"="4" then Xweight=&wgt4;
		else if "&l"="5" then Xweight=&wgt5;
		else if "&l"="6" then Xweight=&wgt6;
		else if "&l"="7" then Xweight=&wgt7;
		else if "&l"="8" then Xweight=&wgt8;
		else if "&l"="9" then Xweight=&wgt9;
		else if "&l"="10" then Xweight=&wgt10;
		else if "&l"="11" then Xweight=&wgt11;
run;
%end;
%mend;
%reshapit;
data l;
	set l1 l2 l3 l4 l5 l6 l7 l8 l9 l10 l11;
run;

PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete l1 l2 l3 l4 l5 l6 l7 l8 l9 l10 l11;
QUIT;
	proc sort data=l; by acost; run;
proc univariate data=l noprint;
			weight Xweight;
			output out=temp4.&ptiles._&vt. PCTLPRE=P_
				PCTLPTS= 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99
				Min=P_0 Max=P_100 MEAN=P_A;
			var acost;
run;

PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete l;
QUIT;

data large5;
	set large4;
		array D(11) D1-D11;
		array O(11) O1-O11;
		array T(11) T1-T11;
		array acost(11) acost1-acost11;
			do i=1 to 11;
				if T(i)=. and O(i)~=. then put "flag 1";
				if O(i)=. and T(i)~=. then put "flag 2";
				if T(i)=. then 				D(i)=.;
				else if	acost(i)>T(i) then 	D(i)=3;
				else if	acost(i)>O(i) then	D(i)=1;
				else 						D(i)=0;
			end;
run;

PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete large4;
QUIT;

%macro loopdum;
%do k=1 %to 11;
	proc sql;
			create table x as select
			NAICS,D&k ,
			count(NAICS) as Count&k
			from large5 group by NAICS,D&k;

			create table d&k as select
			NAICS,D&k as D,
			count&k/sum(count&k) as percent&k format=percent8.2
			from x group by NAICS order by NAICS,D;
	quit;
%end;
%mend;
%loopdum;

%macro loopdum2;
%do k=1 %to 11;
	proc sort data=large5 out=x1; by NAICS D&k; run;
	data x2;
		set x1 (keep=NAICS d&k);
			by NAICS D&k;
				if first.d&k then count&k=1;
					else count&k+1;
				if last.D&k;
	run;
	data max (keep=obs);
		set x1 end=last;
			obs=_n_;
			if last;
	run;
	data d&k (drop=count&k);
 		if _n_=1 then set max;
 		set x2;
			rename d&k=d;
			percent&k=count&k/obs;
 	run;
%end;
%mend;
*%loopdum2;
PROC DATASETS LIBRARY=work   MEMTYPE=DATA nolist;
delete large5;
QUIT;
data temp.&ty.outdata_&vt.;
	merge d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6 d7 d8 d9 d10 d11;
	by NAICS D;
	if d=0 | d=1 | d=3;
run;
%export(temp.&ty.outdata_&vt.,&output.,&ty.thresholds_&vt..csv);
%export(temp4.&ptiles._&vt.,&output2.,&ptiles._&vt..csv);
*%export(temp4.&ptiles._&vt.,&output3.,&ptiles._&vt..csv);
%mend;
%percentiles3(&ptiles);
%mend;

%macro ptiles(ptiles);
*%NAICS2(vt=DF,sdf= ,sff=*,sdp=*,sif=*,sip=*,sss=*,sph=*,smc=*,sns=*,sot=*,
dd1=%,dd1a=%,dd1b=*,dd2=%,dd3=%,dd4=*,dd5=*,dd6=*,dd7=*,dd8=%,dd9=*,dd10=*,
wgt1=0.049,wgt2=0.149,wgt3=0.116,wgt4=0.175,wgt5=0.175,wgt6=0.102,wgt7=0.114,wgt8=0.074,wgt9=0.047,wgt10=0,wgt11=0);

*%NAICS2(vt=FF,sdf=*,sff= ,sdp=*,sif=*,sip=*,sss=*,sph=*,smc=*,sns=*,sot=*,
dd1=*,dd1a=*,dd1b=*,dd2=*,dd3=*,dd4=*,dd5=*,dd6=*,dd7=*,dd8=*,dd9=*,dd10=*,
wgt1=0.286,wgt2=0.481,wgt3=0.118,wgt4=0.089,wgt5=0.014,wgt6=0.012,wgt7=0,wgt8=0,wgt9=0,wgt10=0,wgt11=0);

%NAICS2(vt=DP,sdf=*,sff=*,sdp= ,sif=*,sip=*,sss=*,sph=*,smc=*,sns=*,sot=*,
dd1=%,dd1a=*,dd1b=*,dd2=*,dd3=*,dd4=*,dd5=*,dd6=*,dd7=%,dd8=*,dd9=*,dd10=*,
wgt1=0.134,wgt2=0.197,wgt3=0.142,wgt4=0.079,wgt5=0.205,wgt6=0.142,wgt7=0.102,wgt8=0,wgt9=0,wgt10=0,wgt11=0);

*%NAICS2(vt=IF,sdf=*,sff=*,sdp=*,sif= ,sip=*,sss=*,sph=*,smc=*,sns=*,sot=*,
dd1=%,dd1a=%,dd1b=*,dd2=%,dd3=%,dd4=%,dd5=%,dd6=*,dd7=*,dd8=*,dd9=*,dd10=*,
wgt1=0.109,wgt2=0.126,wgt3=0.131,wgt4=0.262,wgt5=0.169,wgt6=0,wgt7=0.115,wgt8=0.087,wgt9=0,wgt10=0,wgt11=0);

*%NAICS2(vt=IP,sdf=*,sff=*,sdp=*,sif=*,sip= ,sss=*,sph=*,smc=*,sns=*,sot=*,
dd1=%,dd1a=*,dd1b=*,dd2=*,dd3=*,dd4=*,dd5=*,dd6=*,dd7=*,dd8=*,dd9=*,dd10=*,
wgt1=0.121,wgt2=0.287,wgt3=0.21,wgt4=0.172,wgt5=0.146,wgt6=0.064,wgt7=0,wgt8=0,wgt9=0,wgt10=0,wgt11=0);

*%NAICS2(vt=SS,sdf=*,sff=*,sdp=*,sif=*,sip=*,sss= ,sph=*,smc=*,sns=*,sot=*,
dd1=%,dd1a=%,dd1b=*,dd2=%,dd3=*,dd4=*,dd5=*,dd6=*,dd7=*,dd8=*,dd9=*,dd10=*,
wgt1=0.258,wgt2=0.273,wgt3=0.199,wgt4=0.127,wgt5=0.084,wgt6=0.039,wgt7=0.021,wgt8=0,wgt9=0,wgt10=0,wgt11=0);

*%NAICS2(vt=PH,sdf=*,sff=*,sdp=*,sif=*,sip=*,sss=*,sph= ,smc=*,sns=*,sot=*,
dd1=*,dd1a=*,dd1b=*,dd2=*,dd3=*,dd4=*,dd5=*,dd6=*,dd7=*,dd8=*,dd9=*,dd10=*,
wgt1=0.098,wgt2=0.098,wgt3=0.154,wgt4=0.146,wgt5=0.203,wgt6=0.146,wgt7=0,wgt8=0.106,wgt9=0.024,wgt10=0.024,wgt11=0);

*%NAICS2(vt=MC,sdf=*,sff=*,sdp=*,sif=*,sip=*,sss=*,sph=*,smc= ,sns=*,sot=*,
dd1=%,dd1a=%,dd1b=*,dd2=%,dd3=%,dd4=%,dd5=*,dd6=*,dd7=*,dd8=*,dd9=*,dd10=*,
wgt1=0.068,wgt2=0.127,wgt3=0.094,wgt4=0.143,wgt5=0.179,wgt6=0.134,wgt7=0.104,wgt8=0.078,wgt9=0.036,wgt10=0,wgt11=0);

*%NAICS2(vt=NS,sdf=*,sff=*,sdp=*,sif=*,sip=*,sss=*,sph=*,smc=*,sns= ,sot=*,
dd1=%,dd1a=*,dd1b=%,dd2=*,dd3=*,dd4=*,dd5=*,dd6=%,dd7=*,dd8=*,dd9=*,dd10=%,
wgt1=0.085,wgt2=0.225,wgt3=0.234,wgt4=0.147,wgt5=0.135,wgt6=0.079,wgt7=0.056,wgt8=0.04,wgt9=0,wgt10=0,wgt11=0);

*%NAICS2(vt=OT,sdf=*,sff=*,sdp=*,sif=*,sip=*,sss=*,sph=*,smc=*,sns=*,sot= ,
dd1=%,dd1a=*,dd1b=%,dd2=*,dd3=*,dd4=*,dd5=*,dd6=%,dd7=*,dd8=*,dd9=%,dd10=*,
wgt1=0.26,wgt2=0.28,wgt3=0.126,wgt4=0.167,wgt5=0.13,wgt6=0,wgt7=0,wgt8=0.037,wgt9=0,wgt10=0,wgt11=0);

%mend;
%ptiles(Low);
%ptiles(High);

/*
df 483111/483113	wgt1=0.049,wgt2=0.149,wgt3=0.116,wgt4=0.175,wgt5=0.175,wgt6=0.102,wgt7=0.114,wgt8=0.074,wgt9=0.047,wgt10=0,wgt11=0
ff 11411			wgt1=0.286,wgt2=0.481,wgt3=0.118,wgt4=0.089,wgt5=0.014,wgt6=0.012,wgt7=0,wgt8=0,wgt9=0,wgt10=0,wgt11=0
dp 483112/483114	wgt1=0.134,wgt2=0.197,wgt3=0.142,wgt4=0.079,wgt5=0.205,wgt6=0.142,wgt7=0.102,wgt8=0,wgt9=0,wgt10=0,wgt11=0
if 483211			wgt1=0.109,wgt2=0.126,wgt3=0.131,wgt4=0.262,wgt5=0.169,wgt6=0,wgt7=0.115,wgt8=0.087,wgt9=0,wgt10=0,wgt11=0
ip 483212			wgt1=0.121,wgt2=0.287,wgt3=0.21,wgt4=0.172,wgt5=0.146,wgt6=0.064,wgt7=0,wgt8=0,wgt9=0,wgt10=0,wgt11=0
ss 487210			wgt1=0.258,wgt2=0.273,wgt3=0.199,wgt4=0.127,wgt5=0.084,wgt6=0.039,wgt7=0.021,wgt8=0,wgt9=0,wgt10=0,wgt11=0
ph 488310			wgt1=0.098,wgt2=0.098,wgt3=0.154,wgt4=0.146,wgt5=0.203,wgt6=0.146,wgt7=0,wgt8=0.106,wgt9=0.024,wgt10=0.024,wgt11=0
mc 488320			wgt1=0.068,wgt2=0.127,wgt3=0.094,wgt4=0.143,wgt5=0.179,wgt6=0.134,wgt7=0.104,wgt8=0.078,wgt9=0.036,wgt10=0,wgt11=0
ns 488330			wgt1=0.085,wgt2=0.225,wgt3=0.234,wgt4=0.147,wgt5=0.135,wgt6=0.079,wgt7=0.056,wgt8=0.04,wgt9=0,wgt10=0,wgt11=0
ot 488390			wgt1=0.26,wgt2=0.28,wgt3=0.126,wgt4=0.167,wgt5=0.13,wgt6=0,wgt7=0,wgt8=0.037,wgt9=0,wgt10=0,wgt11=0
*/


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 91 (Friday, May 10, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 27472]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11187]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of New Approval of Information Collection: Aircraft
Situational Display to Industry (ASDI) Block Requests

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval for a new information collection.
A Federal Register Notice for proposed process for limiting aircraft
data displayed via ASDI, with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments on the following collection of information was published on
May 9, 2012, vol. 77, no. 90, pages 27269-27271. The collected
information will be used by the National Air Space Data Release Office
to block aircraft flight data as requested by any interested aircraft
owner or operator.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by June 10, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy DePaepe at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-XXXX.
    Title: Aircraft Situational Display to Industry (ASDI) Block
Requests.
    Form Numbers: There are no FAA forms associated with this
collection of information.
    Type of Review: Clearance of a new information collection.
    Background: A Policy Notice in the June 3, 2011 Federal Register
(76 FR 32258) authorized the FAA to administer a program under which
general aviation aircraft owners or operators and on-demand aircraft
could have the ability to ``block'' their aircraft identification
information from release into the ASDI data feed. H.R. 2112, the
``Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2012'', and a
December 16, 2011 Federal Register notice of interim policy (76 FR
78328) further expanded that authority to allow any interested aircraft
owner or operator to simply opt out of the ASDI data feed, by
submitting a written request to the FAA's ASDI Program Office.
    Respondents: Approximately 6,000 owners and operators.
    Frequency: One time per requesting owner/operator.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 5 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 500 hours.
    ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written
comments on the proposed information collection to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget.
Comments should be addressed to the attention of the Desk Officer,
Department of Transportation/FAA, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 6, 2013.
Albert R. Spence,
FAA Assistant Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises
Business Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2013-11187 Filed 5-9-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


EPA REGISTRATION DIVISION COMPANY NOTICE OF FILING FOR PESTICIDE PETITIONS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER

EPA Registration Division contact: PV Shah,<PHONE_NUMBER>

Jeneil Biosurfactant Company
[IN-10849]
	EPA has received a pesticide petition (IN-10849]) from Jeneil Biosurfactant Company, 400 N. Dekora Woods Blvd. Saukville, WI  53080 proposing, pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part 180.
(Options (pick one)
	2. to establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for
	Isoamyl alcohol, CAS #123-51-3, when used as an inert solvent applied to growing crops or harvested crops under 40 CFR 180.910 in pesticide formulations.  EPA has determined that the petition contains data or information regarding the elements set forth in section 408 (d)(2) of  FDDCA; however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether the data supports granting of the petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the petition.

A. Residue Chemistry NA remove
	1. Plant metabolism.
	2. Analytical method. NA remove
	3. Magnitude of residues. NA remove
B. Toxicological Profile  Isoamyl alcohol is moderately acutely toxic and irritating to eyes and skin in animal studies. Humans exposed to dilutions of this compound have not shown evidence of irritation or sensitization. An endpoint of concern for isoamyl alcohol appears to be respiratory irritation.  Central nervous system depression can occur at very high inhaled or ingested acute doses. Repeat-dose animal toxicity studies of isoamyl alcohol suggest that there is no subchronic hazard, including developmental hazard, resulting from the presence of isoamyl alcohol as an inert ingredient in pesticide formulations at the concentrations described in this petition. Oral toxicity studies of isoamyl alcohol identified NOAELs of 1000 to 1657 mg/kg/day in rats. The inhalation NOAEL for maternal effects was 2500 mg/m[3] (681 ppm).
	1. Acute toxicity.  Isoamyl alcohol is low in toxicity by the oral route of exposure. Acute oral toxicity values in rats and rabbits were all greater than 2000 mg/kg except for one LD50 for male rats that was 1300 mg/kg bw. Sublethal effects observed at 5000 mg/kg bw included dyspnea, apathy, staggering, atonia, pareses of rear extremities, and poor general condition (HCN 2003). The weight of evidence suggests that this substance can be considered Acute Toxicity Category III for the oral route of exposure.  An acute dermal toxicity value of 3210 mg/kg bw was reported for isoamyl alcohol in rabbits. No other details were identified for this study. The LD50 of 3210 mg/kg bw categorizes this compound as dermal Acute Toxicity Category III. No guideline animal studies were identified that assessed the acute inhalation toxicity of isoamyl alcohol. Rats exposed to concentrated vapors of isoamyl alcohol for 8 hours did not die within the 14 day observation period. Rats exposed to an "enriched atmosphere" of isoamyl alcohol for seven hours also did not die, but had significant panting and loss of pain reflex.  In mice, the concentration associated with a 50% decrease in respiration rate (RD50) was 2624  -  16,339 mg/m[3].
	2. Genotoxicty. Isoamyl alcohol produced negative results for bacteria cell and in vitro genotoxicity assays. It did not induce reverse mutations in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537 in the absence or presence of metabolic activation; no significant forward mutations at the HPRT locus were observed in V79 Chinese hamster lung fibroblast cells in the presence or absence of metabolic activation; and isoamyl alcohol did not induce DNA damage in human blood cells in the Comet assay (HCN 2003).
	3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity.  In an OECD guideline 414 developmental toxicity study of isoamyl alcohol, pregnant SPF-Wistar, Chbb:THOM rats (25/group) and Himalayan rabbits (15/group) were whole body exposed to 500, 2500, or 10,000 mg/m[3] isoamyl alcohol (136, 681 and 2,725 ppm), 6 hours/day, on gestational days 6 - 15 (rat) or 7 - 19 (rabbits). The following parameters were evaluated: body weight, behavior, uterus and ovary endpoints (weight, number corpora lutea, number implants, early and late resorptions, dead fetuses), and pre- and post-implantation loss. Fetuses were weighed, sexed, and assessed for malformation or variations in skeleton, soft tissue, or external parameters. Inhalation of up to 10,000 mg/m[3] in Wistar rats and Himalayan rabbits produced no developmental effects, although maternal effects at the high dose included reduced body weight gain in both species and eye irritation in rabbits. The NOAEL for maternal effects was 2500 mg/m[3] (681 ppm) and the developmental NOAEL was 10,000 mg/m[3] isoamyl alcohol.
No effects on reproductive parameters, including uterine and ovarian weights, number of corpora lutea, number of implants, incidence of early and late resorptions, sex ratio, and fraction of viable fetuses, were noted in the study described above on prenatal toxicity of isoamyl alcohol. In the 90-day gavage study described above, there were no effects observed on gonad weights in rats. Male rats dosed with 1000 or 500 mg/kg bw for 3 weeks had significantly lower absolute testes weights compared to controls. The rats dosed with 500 mg/kg for three weeks also had lower relative testes weights than controls; this was not seen at the higher dose. Rats dosed for six weeks and 17 weeks showed none of these effects.  The pair feeding study described above strongly suggested that absolute organ weight changes seen in male rats could be attributed to reduced food intake due to localized irritation or unpalatable food and not systemic toxicity.
	5. Chronic toxicity. The European Chemicals Bureau (2000) and Health Council of the Netherlands (HCN)(2003) reported on one non-guideline chronic carcinogenicity study of isoamyl alcohol. Fifteen Wistar rats were administered approximately 80 mg/kw bw isoamyl alcohol by gavage two times per week for an estimated 135 weeks (approximately 23 mg/kg bw/day). The average survival time in treated rats was 527 days, significantly shorter than the 643-day survival of the control group. Four of the 15 orally treated animals developed malignant tumors: two liver cell carcinomas, one gastric carcinoma, and one myeloid leukemia. Three treated rats had benign tumors and three of the 25 control animals developed benign tumors. Other effects noted in treated rats were cirrhosis and possibly other adverse effects on the liver, metaplasia and hyperplasia of the hematopoietic bone marrow parenchyma, spleen metaplasia, and inflammatory pancreatic changes. These effects, plus the appearance and distribution of tumors suggest the systemic maximum tolerated dose was exceeded, and evidence for a specific toxic mode of action for isoamyl alcohol is difficult to elucidate. Based on the absence of a full study and on methodological shortcomings such as the irregular dosing, exceeding of the MTD, and the small sample sizes, it is difficult to draw useful conclusions from this study.
	6. Animal metabolism. Metabolism of alcohols such as isoamyl alcohol proceeds rapidly via hydrolysis to corresponding aldehydes (isovaleraldehyde) then carboxylic acids (isovaleric acid) via alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases. This takes place primarily in the liver, but also in kidneys, lungs, and gastric mucosa. Isovaleric acid would then be metabolized in amino acid and fatty acid pathways. Some conjugation of isoamyl alcohol will also occur, which will then be excreted; in rabbits given a single oral dose of 2200 mg isoamyl alcohol, 9% was excreted in the urine within 24 hours as the glucuronide conjugate.
Hepatic oxidation of isoamyl alcohol is rapid in humans and animals.  One hour after oral administration of 2 g/kg bw isoamyl alcohol, a maximum of 17 mg isoamyl alcohol /100 mL was found in blood, with less than 1 mg/mL detectable after 4 hours; no parent compound was detected in the urine.  A similar pattern was noted following a series of intraperitoneal injections of 1000 mg/kg bw to rats. The maximum (initial) blood concentrations were approximately 36 mg/100 mL, and in less than 5 hours the alcohol had disappeared from the blood. Only small amounts of the parent compound left the body in air or urine (0.97% and 0.27% of total dose, respectively).
Four male volunteers were exposed to 92 mg/m[3] isoamyl alcohol in air for 10 minutes. A quasi-steady state absorption was reached after a few minutes and the mean absorption during that time was 63%. Absorption following nasal exposure in rats was estimated to be 80%.
	7. Metabolite toxicology. NA Remove
	8. Endocrine disruption. Toxicity data related to endocrine disruption were not identified in the isoamyl alcohol database. As the scientific knowledge develops, screening of additional compounds may be added to the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP). When additional screening and/or testing is conducted, isoamyl alcohol may be the focus of screening and/or testing to better characterize effects related to endocrine disruption.
C. Aggregate Exposure
	1. Dietary exposure. The estimated dietary exposure to isoamyl alcohol was determined using methods to estimate chronic dietary exposure for a generic inert ingredient. This assessment considers drinking water and crop-specific residues from pre-harvest applications of agricultural insecticides, herbicides and fungicides, assuming the highest established tolerance level residue for each commodity.  The assessment assumes that the inert ingredient is used on all crops, and that 100% of all crops are treated with the inert.  The inert ingredient is assumed to be present in all commodities treated with 57 of the most significant active ingredients at the maximum tolerance level as identified by the U.S. EPA for the default assessment.  Chronic dietary exposure estimates were derived for the general US population and sub-groups of the population using the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model, DEEM(TM).  The estimated chronic exposure for the total US population is 0.189 mg/kg/day, 1.89% of the chronic Population Adjusted Dose (cPAD).  Children age 1 to 2 years old have the highest estimated exposure at 0.706 mg/kg/day, or 7.06% of the cPAD.
	i. Food. FDA permits the addition of isoamyl alcohol to foods as a flavoring substance and adjuvant. JECFA (1997) estimated the current level of intake of isoamyl alcohol as a flavoring agent to be 1600 μg/person/day in the U.S., or about 0.023 mg/kg bw/day. There are natural sources of dietary isoamyl alcohol including peanut oil, blue cheese, filberts, meat, chickpeas, oranges, bananas, Concord grapes, and nectarines. It is also the main ingredient in fusel oil, a by-product of alcoholic fermentation, and is therefore found in some alcoholic beverages and vinegar.  The average percentage isoamyl alcohol in fusel oil is 60-65%. Residues from this compound's use as an inert pesticide ingredient will be minimal and, particularly in relation to background dietary consumption, not an important dietary source.
	ii. Drinking water. Isoamyl alcohol exposure via drinking water from use as an inert ingredient is not expected to be significant. Isoamyl alcohol is biodegradable and will volatilize moderately quickly from water.  Exposure via the drinking water was estimated in the DEEM dietary exposure assessment assuming a concentration of 100 ppb.
	2. Non-dietary exposure. Residential exposures of concern are not anticipated for isoamyl alcohol due to its inherent ability to biodegrade in the environment, low projected use-level in pesticides, and low general toxicity.
D. Cumulative Effects
	Section 408(b)(2)(D) (9v) of the FFDCA requires that, when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency consider "available information" concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's residues and "other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity." To our knowledge there are no available data or other reliable information that suggests any toxic effects produced by isoamyl alcohol would be cumulative with those of any other chemical compounds. EPA has not made a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to isoamyl alcohol and other compounds. Isoamyl alcohol does not produce toxic metabolites in common with other substances of potential concern. For the purpose of the tolerance exemption proposed, it is assumed that isoamyl alcohol does not share a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances.
E. Safety Determination
	1. U.S. population. Taking into consideration all available information on isoamyl alcohol, there is a reasonable certainty that no harm to any population subgroup will result from dietary and other nonoccupational exposures to isoamyl alcohol when used as an inert ingredient in Flavorzon, an inert mixture intended for use in pesticide formulations. The oral Reference Dose (RfD) and chronic Population Adjusted Dose (cPAD) were derived using the oral NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg/day from the 17-week gavage study in rats, divided by uncertainty factors totaling 100 (10 each for intraspecies and interspecies extrapolations). An additional safety factor was not considered necessary to derive the cPAD because effects on development were not observed in a guideline experiment and because the database is adequate and increased susceptibility is not predicted. Therefore, the oral RfD and cPAD are both 10 mg/kg/day.
For the total US population, the estimated chronic dietary exposure from food and drinking water for isoamyl alcohol, calculated as 50% of all agricultural formulations, is 1.89% of the cPAD, well below any level of potential concern.
	2. Infants and children. There is a reasonable certainty that no harm to infants and children will result from the use of isoamyl alcohol as an inert ingredient in pesticide products. An evaluation of susceptibility and uncertainty issues associated with isoamyl alcohol has been performed. Based on available information, isoamyl alcohol is of low toxicity for human health endpoints at doses expected from its inert use in pesticide formulations.  It is not a developmental toxin to rats or rabbits following inhalation. Therefore, there is no concern for increased sensitivity to infants and children to isoamyl alcohol when used as an inert ingredient in pesticide formulations.
F. International Tolerances
NA Remove