[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 76741-76748]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30117]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Parts 730, 740, 744, 756, 758, and 762

[Docket No. 20524116-3986-02]
RIN 0694-AF70

Revisions to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR):
Unverified List (UVL)

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is amending the
Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by: Requiring exporters to file
an Automated Export System (AES) record for all exports subject to the
EAR involving a party or parties to the transaction who are listed on
the Unverified List (the ``Unverified List'' or UVL); suspending the
availability of license exceptions for exports, reexports, and
transfers (in-country) involving a party or parties to the transaction
who are listed on the UVL; requiring exporters, reexporters, and
transferors to obtain a UVL statement from a party or parties to the
transaction who are listed on the UVL before proceeding with exports,
reexports, and transfers (in-country) involving items subject to the
EAR, but where the item does not require a license, i.e., No License
Required (NLR); publishing the UVL in the EAR; and adding to the EAR
the procedures to request removal or modification of a UVL entry.
    These changes to the UVL enhance the U.S. Government's ability to
verify the bona fides of parties to exports,

reexports, or transfers (in-country) of items subject to the EAR and
provide the U.S. Government increased visibility into such exports,
reexports, and transfers involving persons whose bona fides could not
be verified.

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective: January 21, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Kurland, Director, Office of
Enforcement Analysis, Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of
Commerce, Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On June 14, 2002, the Bureau of Industry and Security (``BIS'')
published a notice in the Federal Register (67 FR 40910) establishing
(the ``Unverified List'' or ``UVL''), a list of persons in foreign
countries who were parties to past export transactions with respect to
which pre-license checks or post-shipment verifications could not be
conducted for reasons outside the control of the U.S. Government,
reasons such as lack of cooperation by the host government authority,
the end user, or the ultimate consignee. That Federal Register notice
also indicated that BIS may add to the UVL names of persons that BIS
discovers are affiliated with a person on the UVL by virtue of
ownership, control, position of responsibility, or other affiliation or
connection in the conduct of trade or business. Since that time, BIS
has issued subsequent notices that added to or removed persons from the
UVL, as circumstances have warranted. Prior to publication of this
rule, the UVL was published in the Federal Register in its entirety and
updated as foreign persons are added to or removed from that list. The
UVL is also available on the BIS Web site at http://www.bis.doc.gov/enforcement/unverifiedlist/unverified_parties.html.
    The participation of a person listed on the UVL in any proposed
transaction raises a ``red flag'' for purposes of the ``Know Your
Customer'' guidance set forth in Supplement No. 3 to Part 732 of the
EAR. See 67 FR 40910 (June 14, 2002) and 69 FR 42652 (July 16, 2004).
Under that guidance, whenever there is a ``red flag,'' exporters have
an affirmative duty to inquire, verify, or otherwise satisfy themselves
that the transaction does not involve a proliferation activity
prohibited by Part 744 and does not violate other provisions of the
EAR.
    On July 16, 2004, BIS expanded the criteria for adding persons to
the UVL to include situations in which BIS is not able to verify the
existence or authenticity of the end user, intermediate consignee,
ultimate consignee, or other party to an export transaction.
    On August 21, 2008 (73 FR 49311), BIS expanded the scope of reasons
to add persons to the Entity List. That rule amended Section 744.11 of
the EAR to provide illustrative examples of the types of conduct that
the U.S. Government could determine are contrary to U.S. national
security or foreign policy interests for purposes of changes to the
Entity List. One example listed in that section is, ``[p]reventing
accomplishment of an end use check conducted by or on behalf of BIS or
the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls of the Department of State
by: Precluding access to; refusing to provide information about; or
providing false or misleading information about parties to the
transaction or the item to be checked.'' That notice also included a
discussion of the apparent overlap in criteria for adding foreign
persons to the Entity List and the Unverified List based on a lack of
cooperation with an end-use check.
    End-use checks sometimes cannot be completed for reasons unrelated
to the cooperation of the foreign party subject to the end-use check.
In such situations, BIS has added parties to the UVL where BIS or
federal officials acting on BIS's behalf have been unable to verify a
foreign person's bona fides (i.e., legitimacy and reliability relating
to the end use and end user of items subject to the EAR), where an end-
use check, such as a pre-license check (PLC) or a post-shipment
verification (PSV), cannot be completed satisfactorily for such
purposes for reasons outside the U.S. Government's control. For
example, BIS sometimes initiates end-use checks and cannot find a
foreign party at the address indicated on export documents, and cannot
locate the party by telephone or email. Additionally, BIS sometimes is
unable to conduct end-use checks when host government agencies do not
respond to requests to conduct end-use checks or refuse to schedule
them in a timely manner. Under these circumstances, there may not be a
basis to add the foreign persons at issue to the Entity List,
particularly if there is no nexus between the foreign person's conduct
and the failure to produce a complete, accurate and useful check (see
Sec.  744.11(b)(4) of the EAR (Criteria for revising the Entity List)).
    Furthermore, BIS sometimes conducts end-use checks but cannot
verify the bona fides of a foreign party. For example, BIS may be
unable to verify bona fides if during the conduct of an end-use check a
recipient of items subject to the EAR is unable to produce those items
for visual inspection or provide sufficient documentation or other
evidence to confirm the disposition of those items. The inability of
foreign persons subject to end-use checks to demonstrate their bona
fides raises concerns about the suitability of such persons as
participants in future exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country)
and indicates a risk that items subject to the EAR may be diverted to
prohibited end uses and/or end users. However, BIS may have
insufficient information to establish that such persons are involved in
activities described in Sec.  744.11 of the EAR, preventing the
placement of the persons on the Entity List. In such circumstances,
those foreign persons may be added to the Unverified List.
    On September 11, 2013 (78 FR 55664), BIS published a proposed rule
to address the issues outlined above. The public comment period for the
proposed rule closed on October 11, 2013. BIS received one (1) public
comment in response. The comment can be found on the BIS Web site at
http://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/electronic-foia/index-of-documents.
    The recommendations set forth in the comment were broken into two
categories: ``Suggestions regarding the language of several affected
paragraphs'' and ``Clarify the government's position regarding the
applicability of this proposed rule to intangible exports of technology
and software.'' The first category included recommended changes to
clarify or strengthen the proposed rule by modifying proposed: Sec.
744.15(a) to state that exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country)
subject to the EAR involving parties to the transaction who are listed
on the UVL must be made in accordance with the criteria set forth in
proposed Sec.  744.15; Sec.  744.15(b)(2) and (b)(2)(i) to require UVL
statement signers to provide their titles and all relevant UVL party
addresses on the Statement, and sign and date the Statement; Sec.
744.15(c)(2) to state that BIS will remove persons from the UVL when
their bona fides are validated; and Sec.  758.1(b)(8) to remove the
phrase ``regardless of value or destination.'' BIS accepted the
recommendations covering Sec.  744.15(a), (b)(2), (b)(2)(i), and
(c)(2). BIS did not accept the suggested change to Sec.  758.1(b)(8).
While BIS agrees that ``all exports'' is unlimited in scope, BIS does
not believe the modifying phrase ``regardless of value or destination''
is unnecessarily redundant. BIS is including this phrase to avoid
confusion with the general Foreign Trade

Regulations exemptions for Automated Export System filings involving
low value shipments and exports to Canada not subject to a BIS license.
The modifier is included to clarify that the UVL rule requires filings
for any shipments to UVL persons, including any low value shipments and
exports to Canada. This clarifying language also appears in Sec.
758.1(b)(1) and (b)(2). BIS understands that the removal of the
modifier would not change the scope, but it was included to be
consistent with other parts of the EAR.
    The second public comment category suggested that BIS clarify
whether the proposed rule applies to intangible technology and
software. BIS intends the provisions of Sec.  744.15 to apply to
intangible exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) of software
and technology to persons listed on the UVL. Therefore, BIS made edits
to the regulatory text and the preamble to indicate that the newly
implemented requirements are applicable to commodities, software, and
technology. The term ``item'' is defined in Sec.  772.1 to include
technology and software. The only other word in the regulatory text
that could have been interpreted as restricted to tangible commodities
was ``shipment.'' Therefore, BIS removed ``shipment'' and replaced it
with ``export, reexport, and transfer (in-country).'' This, coupled
with the general EAR definition of item, should make it clear that
these new requirements are applicable to technology and software, as
well as commodities. However, the requirement to file an AES record
``for all exports'' cannot be fulfilled in the case of intangible
technology or software exports. In any case, these exports are exempt
from AES filings. Therefore, while the regulation applies to technology
and software, in addition to commodities, the amendment to Sec.
758.1(b)(8) only applies to exports of tangible items.
    BIS also amended the proposed text of Sec.  744.15(b)(2)(iv). As
proposed, the UVL statement required cooperation with a pre-license
check. However, under the terms of paragraph (b) of that section, the
UVL statement is only necessary when no license is required. As such,
this final rule omits the requirement that the UVL statement include an
agreement for a pre-license check because no license is required under
these circumstances. The UVL statement does retain the proposed rule's
requirement that an end-use check, including a post-shipment
verification, must be agreed to and cooperated with.

Reasons for This Rule

    This rule eliminates ambiguity for listing foreign persons on the
UVL and the Entity List by removing lack of cooperation by a foreign
party as a basis for revising the UVL. Where the U.S. Government
determines that the foreign party's lack of cooperation prevented the
accomplishment of an end-use check, BIS may add such parties to the
Entity List on the basis of Sec.  744.11(b)(4) of the EAR.
    Specifically, BIS is amending the EAR to include the criteria for
listing persons in the UVL, including examples of actions that could
result in a person being listed on the UVL. These amendments,
consistent with past practice, will apply to foreign persons who are
parties to an export, reexport, and transfer (in-country) subject to
the EAR if BIS, or federal officials acting on BIS's behalf, cannot
verify the bona fides of such persons because an end-use check, such as
a PLC or a PSV, cannot be completed satisfactorily for reasons outside
of the U.S. Government's control. Examples of actions that could result
in a person being listed on the UVL include: The subject of the check
is unable to demonstrate the disposition of items during an end-use
check; the existence or authenticity of the subject of an end-use check
cannot be verified because, inter alia, the subject of the check cannot
be located or contacted; or lack of cooperation by the host government
authority.
    In addition, BIS is no longer considering affiliation with a person
on the UVL as a basis for adding foreign persons without further
substantiation (e.g., conduct of an end-use check at the affiliate). A
determination to list a particular person on the UVL is premised on
BIS's inability to evaluate the bona fides of that person by conducting
an end-use check. The fact that another, separate person is affiliated
with a person on the UVL will no longer be considered a dispositive
criterion forming the basis for listing the affiliate. If BIS discovers
a foreign person may be affiliated with a person listed on the UVL, BIS
will initiate an end-use check on an export, reexport, or transfer (in-
country) to which that person was a party. That person may be listed on
the UVL if BIS is unable to verify that person's bona fides through an
end-use check in accordance with the criteria described above.
    BIS is implementing these changes to the UVL to address concerns
raised by the public in the past about how to address a ``red flag''
identified by the U.S. Government. Accordingly, this regulation
provides guidance on how exporters can conduct business with a UVL
person. Any license requirements for exports, reexports, or transfers
(in-country) of items subject to the EAR continue to apply. For items
not subject to a license requirement, the exporter, reexporter, or
transferor (in-country) must receive from the UVL-listed person a UVL
statement prior to the export, reexport, or transfer (in-country), in
which the UVL-listed party certifies the end use, end user, and country
of ultimate destination of items subject to the EAR and consents to an
end-use check by the U.S. Government. The end-use check may include
checks to any transaction to which that person was a party for items
subject to the EAR exported, reexported, or transferred (in country) in
the last five years, to enable the U.S. Government to satisfy earlier
concerns with the UVL-listed party as well as its concerns with the
current transaction.

Changes to the EAR

    BIS is amending the EAR by: (1) Requiring exporters to file an AES
record for all exports subject to the EAR involving persons listed on
the UVL; (2) suspending the availability of license exceptions for
exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) involving persons listed
on the UVL; (3) requiring exporters, reexporters and transferors (in-
country) to obtain a UVL statement from UVL-listed persons before
proceeding with exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) that are
not otherwise subject to a license requirement under the EAR involving
such persons; (4) adding the UVL to Supplement No. 6 to Part 744, and
(5) adding to the EAR procedures to request removal or modification of
a UVL entry.
    The first of these changes, requiring the filing of an AES record
for all exports to which a person listed on the UVL is a party, as
described in Sec.  748.5(d)-(f) of the EAR, increases U.S. Government
awareness of exports involving U.S.-origin items to such persons. Under
current regulations, an AES filing is only required if an export
license is also required or if the transaction is above a certain
value. This rule, through a change to Sec.  758.1, implements a
requirement to submit an AES filing for all exports, regardless of
value or destination, if a person involved in the transaction as
described above is listed on the UVL.
    Secondly, under Sec.  740.2, this rule suspends license exceptions
for exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) of U.S.-origin items
to persons listed on the UVL. The change increases U.S. Government
insight into certain

transactions involving such persons of items on the Commerce Control
List (set forth in Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 of the EAR) by
requiring a license for those transactions. This suspension is also
consistent with Sec.  740.2(b) of the EAR, which states, ``all License
Exceptions are subject to revision, suspension, or revocation, in whole
or in part, without notice.''
    Third, this rule requires exporters to obtain a signed and dated
UVL statement from UVL-listed persons before proceeding with any
export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) involving such persons, when
such persons are parties to a transaction as described in Sec.  748.5
of the EAR, and when the item at issue is subject to the EAR but does
not require a license under the EAR.
    That section also requires that the statement certify the end use,
end user, and country of ultimate destination of the items, and set
forth the person's consent to an end-use check by the U.S. Government.
To facilitate any future end-use checks by the U.S. Government, the
UVL-listed person must also include its complete contact information in
the UVL statement, including all relevant physical addresses (e.g.,
shipping address, corporate address, intended end user address, etc.).
This statement establishes that the UVL-listed party knows that it is
required to comply with the EAR and agrees to an end-use check. The
statement also provides the U.S. Government with some assurance that
the U.S.-origin item will be delivered to an identified end user and
end use and that the transaction will comply with the EAR. In the
absence of such compliance, the UVL statement will assist the U.S.
Government's ability to take enforcement action.
    The suspension of license exceptions, which will allow prior review
by the U.S. Government of exports, reexports, and transfers (in-
country) of certain controlled items involving persons listed on the
UVL, coupled with the requirement for exporters to obtain a UVL
statement for exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) involving
such persons of items not subject to a license requirement, provides
greater guidance on what steps are necessary in order to undertake an
export, reexport, or re-transfer (in-country) of items subject to the
EAR involving a party to the transaction who is listed on the UVL.
    Specifically, when an export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) is
otherwise eligible for a license exception, if a party to the
transaction as described in Sec.  748.5 of the EAR is listed on the
UVL, the use of license exceptions is not authorized. Under these
circumstances, an exporter must apply to BIS for a license. If an
export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) involving a person listed on
the UVL is not subject to a license requirement under the EAR, the
possible availability of a license exception does not arise. In such a
case, an exporter may proceed with the export, reexport, or transfer
(in-country) once the exporter obtains the signed UVL statement
described herein and files an AES record in accordance with Sec.  758.1
of the EAR, as amended. The signed UVL statement is not needed for
transactions in which a license is required because BIS oversight of
the transaction resulting from the grant of the license renders a UVL
statement unnecessary.
    Fourth, this rule adds the UVL to the EAR in Supplement No. 6 to
Part 744, but removes all persons previously listed on the UVL. BIS
will add persons to and remove them from the UVL whenever a decision is
made in accordance with the criteria for revising the UVL set forth in
Sec.  744.15(c). Henceforth, when adding a person to the UVL, BIS will
list the person's name and address, and the date on which the person
was added to the UVL by publication in the Federal Register. Updates to
the UVL will continue to be published in the Federal Register, and will
remain available on the BIS Web site. The UVL will also continue to be
included in the Consolidated Screening List, available at
www.export.gov.
    Supplement No. 6 to Part 744 (``the UVL'') contains the names and
addresses of foreign persons who are or have been parties to a
transaction, as that term is described in Sec.  748.5 of the EAR,
involving the export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) of items
subject to the EAR, and whose bona fides BIS has been unable to verify
through an end-use check. Any changes to the UVL will be published in
the Federal Register as an amendment to the UVL.
    In addition to adding the UVL to Supplement No. 6 to Part 744, this
rule adds to the regulations an overview of the UVL, the conditions it
imposes with respect to exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country)
to listed persons, the criteria for revising the UVL, and the
procedures for requesting removal or modification of a UVL entry.
    BIS adds a person to the UVL under certain circumstances. For
example, in some instances, BIS may not be able to conduct an end-use
check, such as a PLC or a PSV, at all because, among other potential
reasons, BIS was unable to locate or contact the subject of the check
or the host government declined to schedule the check in a timely
manner. Alternatively, BIS may not be able to complete a satisfactory
end-use check because, inter alia the foreign party is unable to
demonstrate its bona fides or the disposition of the items in question
during the end-use check. In either circumstance, BIS may determine to
add the foreign person to the UVL.
    BIS removes a person listed on the UVL using certain procedures.
The successful completion of an end-use check, or, in the limited
circumstance where such a check cannot be completed due to lack of host
government cooperation, a suitable alternative process to verify the
bona fides of the foreign party at issue is a prerequisite for removing
persons from the UVL. One illustrative example of alternative
authentication could involve the U.S. exporter or license applicant
visiting the foreign person subject to the end-use check, at that
person's request, and providing sufficient information to the U.S.
Government to verify the foreign person's bona fides and satisfy
questions relating to the end use and end user of the items in
question. Procedures for requesting an alternative process to verify
the bona fides of a foreign person in this circumstance are identical
to the procedures for requesting removal of a UVL listing, set forth in
Sec.  744.15 of the EAR.
    If BIS confirms the bona fides of a listed person based on the
criteria in Sec.  744.15(b)(2) of the EAR, BIS will publish a final
rule in the Federal Register removing that person from the UVL. A
determination to remove a person from the UVL is independent of any
determination BIS may make pursuant to Sec.  744.11(b) of the EAR. Once
a foreign person is removed from the UVL, the provisions in the EAR
regarding persons listed on the Unverified List will no longer apply to
that person though other provisions in the EAR will continue to apply
as appropriate. BIS will regularly review the UVL for the purpose of
identifying and implementing any needed corrections and updates.
    Lastly, this rule modifies the procedures for requesting removal of
a person listed on the UVL by adding decisions on requests to remove or
modify a UVL entry to the list of administrative actions that are not
subject to Part 756 appeals. Requests for removal of a UVL entry must
be made in accordance with Sec.  744.15(d) of the EAR. Decisions
regarding the removal or modification of UVL listings will be made by
the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement, based on a
demonstration by the listed person of its bona fides.

Amendment to Supplement No. 1 to Part 730

    Due to this rule's addition to the EAR of Sec.  744.15 below, this
rule also amends Supplement No. 1 to Part 730 of the EAR to include
references to the two additional information collections: (1) The UVL
statement and (2) requests to remove or modify listings on the UVL. The
collection and retention of the UVL statement by private parties in
connection with the export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) to a
person listed on the UVL of items not subject to a license requirement
under the EAR shall be made under Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
control number 0694-0122 (``Licensing Responsibilities and
Enforcement''). The submission of information to BIS by persons listed
on the UVL in support of an appeal for removal a UVL listing will be
made under OMB control number 0694-0134. Accordingly, this rule amends
Supplement No. 1 to Part 730 of the EAR by adding a reference to new
Sec.  744.15 in connection with existing collection number 0694-0122,
and by changing the title of existing collection number 0694-0134 to
``Procedure for parties on the Entity List or Unverified List to
Request Removal or Modification of their Listing'' and adding a
reference to new Sec.  744.15 in connection with that collection
number.

Amendments to Sec.  740.2

    This rule adds a new paragraph (a)(17) to Sec.  740.2
``Restrictions on all License Exceptions.'' This paragraph explains
that license exceptions may not be used where a party to the
transaction as described in Sec.  748.5 of the EAR is listed on the
Unverified List.

New Sec.  744.15 and Amendment to Sec.  756.1

    This rule adds a new section to Part 744 to set forth the new
provisions pertaining to persons listed on the UVL. New Sec.  744.15
provides an overview of the UVL, the conditions it imposes with respect
to exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) to listed persons,
and the criteria for revising the UVL. This new section also includes
the procedures for requesting removal or modification of a person on
the UVL.
    This rule excludes appeals for removal of Unverified List entries
from the provisions of Part 756 of the EAR. Requests for removal
instead must made according to the procedures set forth in new Sec.
744.15 of the EAR. Accordingly, paragraph (a)(3) of Sec.  756.1 of the
EAR is amended by adding a reference to decisions on requests to remove
UVL entries made pursuant to new Sec.  744.15 of the EAR. Although the
proposed rule did not include a revision to Sec.  744.1, this rule
makes an inconsequential revision to Sec.  744.1(a)(1), by adding a
description of the new Sec.  744.15 and a reference to the new
Supplement No. 6 to Part 744.

New Supplement No. 6 to Part 744

    The UVL is added to the EAR in Supplement No. 6 to Part 744. Each
listing grouped by country, and accompanied by the person's address(es)
as well as the Federal Register citation and date the person was added
to the UVL. In addition, the UVL includes a citation to Sec.  744.15,
indicating that exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) where
parties to the transactions are listed on the Unverified List are
subject to the provisions of Sec.  744.15.

Amendment to Sec.  758.1

    This rule adds a new Sec.  758.1(b)(8) of the EAR, which states
that filing an AES record is required for all exports of items subject
to the EAR where a party to the transaction as described in Sec.
748.5(d)-(f) is listed on the Unverified List, regardless of value or
destination.

Amendment to Sec.  762.2

    Section 762.2(b) of the EAR contains references to parts, sections,
and supplements of the EAR which require the retention of records or
contain recordkeeping provisions. New Sec.  744.15 of the EAR contains
a recordkeeping requirement related to the retention of UVL statements.
Therefore, this rule modifies reserved paragraph Sec.  762.2(b)(13) of
the EAR to reference the UVL statement recordkeeping requirement in new
Sec.  744.15 of the EAR.

Export Administration Act

    Since August 21, 2001, the Export Administration Act of 1979, as
amended, has been in lapse. However, the President, through Executive
Order 13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002), as
amended by Executive Order 13637 of March 8, 2013, 78 FR 16129 (March
13, 2013), and as extended by the Notice of August 8, 2013, 78 FR 49107
(August 12, 2013) has continued the EAR in effect under the
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.).
BIS continues to carry out the provisions of the Export Administration
Act, as appropriate and to the extent permitted by law, pursuant to
Executive Order 13222 as amended by Executive Order 13637.

Rulemaking Requirements

    1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
    2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to, nor is subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with, a collection of information, subject to the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA),
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This regulation involves
collections previously approved by OMB under the following control
numbers: 0694-0088, 0694-0122, 0694-0134, and 0694-0137. Specifically,
BIS has requested a revision and extension of existing collection OMB
0694-0134 (Procedure for parties on the Entity List to Request Removal
or Modification of their Listing) and non-substantive changes to OMB
Control Numbers 0694-0088 (Simplified Network Application Processing
and Multipurpose Application Form), 0694-0122 (Licensing
Responsibilities and Enforcement), and 0694-0137 (License Exemptions
and Exclusions).
    This rule slightly increases public burden in a collection of
information approved by OMB under control number 0694-0088, which
authorizes, among other things, export license applications. The
removal of license exceptions for listed parties on the Unverified List
will result in increased license applications being submitted to BIS by
exporters. Total burden hours associated with the Paperwork Reduction
Act and OMB control number 0694-0088 are expected to increase
minimally, as the suspension of license exceptions will only affect
transactions involving parties listed on the Unverified List and not
all export transactions. Since license exceptions are restricted from
use, this rule decreases public burden in a collection of information
approved by OMB under control number 0694-0137 minimally,

as this will only affect a very small number of individual listed
parties. The increased burden under 0694-0088 is reciprocal to the
decrease of burden under 0694-0137, and results in no change of burden
to the public. This rule also increases public burden in a collection
of information under OMB control number 0694-0122, as a result of the
exchange of UVL statements between private parties, and under OMB
control number 0694-0134 as a result of appeals from persons listed on
the UVL for removal of their listing. The total increase in burden
hours associated with both of these collections is expected to be
minimal, as they involve a limited number of persons listed on the UVL.
    3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined in Executive Order 13132.
    4. The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
has certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Number of Small Entities
    Currently, BIS does not collect data on the size of entities that
apply for and are issued export licenses. Although BIS is unable to
estimate the exact number of small entities that will be impacted by
this rule, it acknowledges that this rule will impact some unknown
number. This rule will affect exporters and freight forwarders, with
obligations to apply for export licenses, obtain and retain UVL
statements, and/or file AES records in connection with exports,
reexports, or transfers (in-country) in which a person listed on the
UVL is a party to the transaction. These requirements apply to all
entities proceeding with such transactions, regardless of size.
Economic Impact
    BIS is unable to determine whether there are a substantial number
of small entities affected by this rule. However, this rule is not
expected to affect a disproportionate number of small entities because
it is directed at a limited number of foreign persons and will impact
all export transactions to these persons, regardless of whether the
exports are made or intended to be made by small, medium, or large
entities. BIS has administered the UVL based on listing criteria
similar to those set forth in this rule since 2002. This rule will
impact transactions involving persons listed on the UVL, which
currently has 36 persons listed. Due to the limited number of persons
expected to be maintained on the UVL, BIS estimates that the number of
transactions involving these persons represents only a small fraction
of the total number of transactions recorded in AES. BIS estimates that
regulated entities will incur minimal economic burdens on transactions
involving UVL persons as a result of this rule because there are few
transactions involving such persons and for those transactions where
they are involved, there is no monetary fee to apply for a BIS license
or file a record in AES. Moreover, obtaining a signed UVL statement
from UVL persons for items not subject to a license requirement will
result in minimal burden to U.S. exporters, as the statement can simply
be copied from the EAR and forwarded to the UVL person for review and
signature. The maintenance of any such UVL statement also will have
minimal burden on U.S. exporters as the EAR already has similar
recordkeeping requirements under Section 762.2 of the EAR. As a result,
the requirements of this rule will amount to very little economic
burden.
    For the reasons above, the Chief Counsel for Regulation certified
that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    No comments were received regarding the economic impact of this
final rule. As a result, a final regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required and one was not prepared.

List of Subjects

15 CFR Part 730

    Administrative practice and procedure, Advisory committees,
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Strategic and
critical materials.

15 CFR Part 740

    Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

15 CFR Part 744

    Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Terrorism.

15 CFR Part 756

    Appeals.

15 CFR Part 758

    Export clearance requirements.

15 CFR Part 762

    Recordkeeping.

    Accordingly, Parts 730, 740, 744, 756, 758, and 762 of the Export
Administration Regulations (15 CFR parts 730-774) are amended as
follows:

PART 730--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR Part 730 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C. 7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c; 22 U.S.C. 2151
note; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s),
185(u); 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42 U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C. 1354; 15 U.S.C.
1824a; 50 U.S.C. app. 5; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210;
E.O. 11912, 41 FR 15825, 3 CFR, 1976 Comp., p. 114; E.O. 12002, 42
FR 35623, 3 CFR, 1977 Comp., p. 133; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR,
1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12214, 45 FR 29783, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p.
256; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12854,
58 FR 36587, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12918, 59 FR 28205, 3
CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 899; E.O. 12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp.,
p. 950; E.O. 12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 356; E.O.
12981, 60 FR 62981, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 419; E.O. 13020, 61 FR
54079, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 219; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR,
1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 CFR, 1998 Comp., p.
208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13224,
66 FR 49079, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 786; E.O. 13338, 69 FR 26751, 3
CFR, 2004 Comp., p 168; E.O. 13637 of March 8, 2013, 78 FR 16129
(March 13, 2013); Notice of January 17, 2013, 78 FR 4303 (January
22, 2013); Notice of May 7, 2013, 78 FR 27301 (May 9, 2013); Notice
of August 8, 2013, 78 FR 49107 (August 12, 2013); Notice of
September 18, 2013, 78 FR 58151 (September 20, 2013) ; Notice of
November 7, 2013, 78 FR 67289 (November 12, 2013).

0
2. Supplement No. 1 to Part 730 is amended by:
0
a. Removing the phrase ``Part 758, and Sec.  748.4'' and adding in its
place ``Sec. Sec.  744.15(b) and 748.4 and Part 758'' in the
``Reference in the EAR'' column of 0694-0122 row;
0
b. Removing the Title ``Procedure for parties on the Entity List to
Request Removal or Modification of their Listing'' and adding in its
place ``Procedure for parties on the Entity List or the Unverified List
to Request Removal or Modification of their Listing'' in the Title
Column of the 0694-0134 row; and
0
c. Removing the reference ``Sec.  744.16'' and adding in its place
``Sec. Sec.  744.15 and 744.16'' in the Reference in the EAR column of
the 0694-0134 row.

PART 740--[AMENDED]

0
3. The authority citation for 15 CFR Part 740 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp.,
p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice
of August 8, 2013, 78 FR 49107 (August 12, 2013).

0
4. Section 740.2 is amended by adding paragraph (a)(17) to read as
follows:

Sec.  740.2  Restrictions on all license exceptions.

    (a) * * *
    (17) A party to the transaction, as described in Sec.  748.5 of the
EAR, is listed on the Unverified List in Supplement No. 6 to Part 744,
see Sec.  744.15 of the EAR.
* * * * *

PART 744--[AMENDED]

0
5. The authority citation for 15 CFR Part 744 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22
U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 179;
E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59
FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR,
1995 Comp., p. 356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222,
66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13224, 66 FR 49079, 3
CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 786; Notice of January 17, 2013, 78 FR 4303
(January 22, 2013); Notice of August 8, 2013, 78 FR 49107 (August
12, 2013); Notice of September 18, 2013, 78 FR 58151 (September 20,
2013) ; Notice of November 7, 2013, 78 FR 67289 (November 12, 2013).

0
6. Section 744.1 is amended by adding the sentence set forth below
after the tenth sentence in paragraph (a)(1).

Sec.  744.1  General provisions.

    (a)(1) * * * Section 744.15 sets forth the conditions for exports,
reexports, and transfers (in-country) to persons listed on the
Unverified List (UVL) in Supplement No. 6 of this part, the criteria
for revising the UVL, as well as procedures for requesting removal or
modification of a listing on the UVL. * * *

0
7. Adding Sec.  744.15 to read as follows:

Sec.  744.15  Restrictions on exports, reexports and transfers (in-
country) to persons listed on the unverified list.

    (a) General requirement. In addition to the requirements set forth
elsewhere in the EAR, exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country)
subject to the EAR involving parties to the transaction who are listed
on the Unverified List (UVL) must be made in accordance with paragraph
(b) of this section. The names and addresses of foreign persons subject
to end-user controls based on the criteria described in paragraph (c)
of this section are identified in the Unverified List found in
Supplement No. 6 to this part. Requirements found elsewhere in the EAR
also apply, including but not limited to any license requirements, the
record filing requirements pursuant to Sec.  758.1(b)(8), and the
restrictions on license exceptions described in Sec.  740.2(a)(17) of
the EAR.
    (b) UVL statement. Before proceeding with any export, reexport, or
transfer (in-country) subject to the EAR that is not subject to a
license requirement, involving a person listed on the Unverified List
as a party described in Sec.  748.5 of the EAR, an exporter,
reexporter, or transferor (in-country) must obtain a UVL statement from
such person, according to the provisions set forth in this section. The
statement must be retained in accordance with part 762 of the EAR.
    (1) One UVL statement may be used for multiple exports, reexports,
and transfers (in-country) of the same items between the same parties,
so long as the party names, the description(s) of the items and the
ECCNs are correct. If one UVL statement is used for multiple exports,
reexports, and transfers (in-country), the exporter, reexporter, and
transferor must maintain a log or other record that identifies each
export, reexport, and transfer (in-country) made pursuant to this
section and the specific UVL statement that is associated with each.
The log or record must be retained in accordance with Part 762 of the
EAR.
    (2) The UVL statement must be in writing, signed and dated by an
individual of sufficient authority to legally bind the UVL party, and
state the following:
    (i) Name of UVL party; complete physical address, to include
shipping, corporate, and end user addresses, if different (simply
listing a post office box is insufficient); telephone number; fax
number; email address; Web site (if available); and name and title of
individual signing the UVL statement.
    (ii) Agrees not to use the item(s) for any use prohibited by the
United States Export Administration Regulations (EAR), 15 CFR Parts
730-772, and agrees not to reexport or transfer (in-country) the
item(s) to any destination, use or user prohibited by the EAR.
    (iii) Declares that the end use, end user, and country of ultimate
destination of the item(s) subject to the EAR are as follows: [INSERT
END USE, END USER, AND COUNTRY OF ULTIMATE DESTINATION].
    (iv) Agrees to cooperate with end-use checks, including a Post-
Shipment Verification, conducted by or on behalf of the Bureau of
Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, for any item
subject to the EAR in transactions to which they were a party in the
last five years. This cooperation includes facilitating the timely
conduct of the check and providing full and accurate information
concerning the disposition of items subject to the EAR.
    (v) Agrees to provide copies of this document and all other export,
reexport or transfer (in-country) records required to be retained in
part 762 of the EAR.
    (vi) Certifies that the individual signing the UVL statement has
sufficient authority to legally bind the party.
    (c) Criteria for revising the Unverified List. (1) Foreign persons
who are parties to an export, reexport, and transfer (in-country)
subject to the EAR may be added to the Unverified List if BIS or
federal officials acting on BIS's behalf cannot verify the bona fides
(i.e., legitimacy and reliability relating to the end use and end user
of items subject to the EAR) of such persons because an end-use check,
such as a pre-license check (PLC) or a post-shipment verification
(PSV), cannot be completed satisfactorily for reasons outside of the
U.S. Government's control. Examples in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through
(iii) of this section provide an illustrative list of those
circumstances.
    (i) During the conduct of an end-use check, the subject of the
check is unable to demonstrate the disposition of items subject to the
EAR.
    (ii) The existence or authenticity of the subject of an end-use
check cannot be verified (e.g., the subject of the check cannot be
located or contacted).
    (iii) Lack of cooperation by the host government authority prevents
an end-use check from being conducted.
    (2) BIS will remove a person from the Unverified List when BIS is
able to verify the bona fides of the listed person as an end user,
consignee, or other party to exports, reexports, or transfers (in-
country) involving items subject to the EAR by completing a PLC or PSV.
In the limited circumstance involving a PLC or PSV that cannot be
completed due to lack of host government cooperation, an alternative
bona fides verification process may be determined by BIS to be
sufficient. A determination to remove a person from the Unverified List
based on the criteria in this paragraph is separate from any
determination made by BIS pursuant to Sec.  744.11(b) of the EAR, and
must be requested through paragraph (d) of this section.
    (d) Procedure for requesting removal of a person on the Unverified
List. Any person listed on the Unverified List may request that its
listing be amended or removed.
    (1) All such requests, including reasons therefor and information
that verifies the bona fides, i.e., legitimacy and reliability of the
person listed on the Unverified List as an end user, consignee or other
party to exports,

reexports, and transfers (in-country) of items subject to the EAR, must
be in writing and sent to: Director, Office of Enforcement Analysis,
Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Room 4065, Washington, DC 20230,
via fax to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) The Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement will
review such requests and will convey the decision on the request to the
requester in writing based on an assessment of the listed person's bona
fides as a party to exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country)
subject to the EAR. That decision will be the final agency action on
the request.

0
8. Supplement No. 6 to Part 744 is added to read as follows:

Supplement No. 6 to Part 744--Unverified List

    Exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) involving parties to
the transaction who are listed in this supplement are subject to the
restrictions outlined in Sec.  744.15 of the EAR.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Federal Register
            Country               Listed person and   citation and date
                                       address          of publication
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reserved.......................  Reserved..........  Reserved.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

PART 756--[AMENDED]

0
9. The authority citation for 15 CFR Part 756 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 50 U.S.C. app 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
8, 2013, 78 FR 49107 (August 12, 2013).

0
10. Section 756.1 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(3) to read as
follows:

Sec.  756.1  Introduction.

    (a) * * *
    (3) A decision on a request to remove or modify an Entity List
entry made pursuant to Sec.  744.16 of the EAR or a decision on a
request to remove an Unverified List entry made pursuant to Sec.
744.15 of the EAR.
* * * * *

PART 758--[AMENDED]

0
11. The authority citation for 15 CFR Part 758 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
8, 2013, 78 FR 49107 (August 12, 2013).
0
12. Section 758.1 is amended by adding paragraph (b)(8) to read as
follows:

Sec.  758.1  The Automated Export System (AES) record.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (8) For all exports of tangible items subject to the EAR where
parties to the transaction, as described in Sec.  748.5(d)-(f) of the
EAR, are listed on the Unverified List (Supplement 6 to Part 744 of the
EAR), regardless of value or destination.
* * * * *

PART 762--[AMENDED]

0
13. The authority citation for 15 CFR Part 762 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
8, 2013, 78 FR 49107 (August 12, 2013).

0
14. Section 762.2 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(13) to read as
follows:

Sec.  762.2  Records to be retained.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (13) Sec.  744.15(b), UVL statement as well as any logs or records
created for multiple exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country);
* * * * *

    Dated: December 12, 2013.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-30117 Filed 12-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 907-909]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00073]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0764]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Animal Feed
Regulatory Program Standards

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing

that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by
February 7, 2020.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0760.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Domini Bean, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.

Animal Feed Regulatory Program Standards

OMB Control Number 0910-0760--Extension

I. Background

    In the United States, Federal and State Government Agencies ensure
the safety of animal feed. FDA is responsible for ensuring that all
food and feed moving in interstate commerce, except those under the
U.S. Department of Agriculture jurisdiction, are safe, wholesome, and
labeled properly. States are responsible for conducting inspections and
regulatory activities that help ensure food and feed produced,
processed, and distributed within their jurisdictions are safe and in
compliance with State laws and regulations. States primarily perform
inspections under their own regulatory authority. Some States conduct
inspections of feed facilities under contract with FDA. Because
jurisdictions may overlap, FDA and States collaborate and share
resources to protect animal feed.
    The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (Pub. L. 111-353) passed on
January 4, 2011, calls for enhanced partnerships and provides a legal
mandate for developing an Integrated Food Safety System (IFSS). FDA is
committed to implementing an IFSS thereby optimizing coordination of
food and feed safety efforts with Federal, State, local, tribal, and
territorial regulatory and public health agencies. Model standards
provide a consistent, underlying foundation that is critical for
uniformity across State and Federal Agencies to ensure credibility of
food and feed programs within the IFSS.

II. Significance of Feed Program Standards

    The Animal Feed Regulatory Program Standards (AFRPS) provide a
uniform and consistent approach to feed regulation in the United
States. Implementation of the draft feed program standards is
voluntary. States implementing the standards will identify and maintain
program improvements that will strengthen the safety and integrity of
the U.S. animal feed supply.
    The feed standards are the framework that each State should use to
design, manage, and improve its feed program. The standards include the
following: (1) Regulatory foundation; (2) training; (3) inspection
program; (4) auditing; (5) feed-related illness or death and emergency
response; (6) enforcement program; (7) outreach activities; (8) budget
and planning; (9) assessment and improvement; (10) laboratory services;
and (11) sampling program.
    Each standard has a purpose statement, requirement summary,
description of program elements, projected outcomes, and a list of
required documentation. When a State program voluntarily agrees to
implement the feed standards, it must fully implement and maintain the
individual program elements and documentation requirements in each
standard in order to fully implement the standard.
    The feed standards package includes forms, worksheets, and
templates to help the State program assess and meet the program
elements in the standard. State programs are not obligated to use the
forms, worksheets, and templates provided with the feed standards.
Other manual or automated forms, worksheets, and templates may be used
as long as the pertinent data elements are present. Records and other
documents specified in the feed standards must be maintained in good
order by the State program and must be available to verify the
implementation of each standard. The feed standards are not intended to
address the performance appraisal processes that a State agency may use
to evaluate individual employee performance.
    As set forth in the feed standards, the State program is expected
to review and update its improvement plan on an annual basis. The State
program completes an evaluation of its implementation status at least
every 3 years following the baseline evaluation by reviewing and
updating the self-assessment worksheets and required documentation for
each standard. The evaluation is needed to determine if each standard's
requirements are, or remain, fully met, partially met, or not met. The
State program revises the improvement plan based upon this evaluation.
    Although FDA plans to provide financial support to State programs
that implement the feed standards, funding opportunities are contingent
upon the availability of funds. Funding opportunities may be only
available to State feed regulatory programs that currently have an FDA
feed inspection contract. State programs receiving financial support to
implement the feed standards will be audited by FDA.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the internet may submit requests for a
single copy of the current feed standards from<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    In the Federal Register of September 20, 2019 (84 FR 49524), we
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. One comment was submitted but did not
address any of the topics solicited and we therefore do not discuss the
comment here.
    We estimate the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                                   Table 1--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of                       Average burden
                         Type of respondent                             Number of       records per      Total annual         per          Total hours
                                                                      recordkeepers     recordkeeper       records       recordkeeping
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Animal Feed Regulatory Program in the United States..........              34                1               34              569           19,346
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    Respondents to the information collection are State agencies
seeking to avail themselves of the options described in the document.
State agencies that conduct feed inspections under contract are
interested in implementing the standards. The total estimated annual
recordkeeping burden for implementation is 569 hours per respondent.
The burden was determined by capturing the average amount of time for
each respondent to assess the current state of the program and work
toward implementation of each of the 11 standards contained in the
AFRPS. The hours per State feed regulatory program will average the
same to account for continual improvement and self-sufficiency in the
program. Our burden estimate reflects a decrease of 100,654 hours as a
result of fewer respondents to the collection and a reevaluation of the
time we ascribe for recordkeeping activities.

    Dated: January 2, 2020.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-00073 Filed 1-7-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30238-30239]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12757]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2011-0018]

Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation, (DOT).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) below has been forwarded to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR describes
the nature of the information collection and the expected burden. The
Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period was published on
February 11, 2011 (76 FR 7897-7898).

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 23, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Laurie Flaherty, Program Analyst,
Office of Emergency Medical Services, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., NTI-140, W44-322,
Washington, DC 20590,<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

    Title: National 9-1-1 Profile Database as part of the National 9-1-
1 Program.
    OMB Number: 2127 New.
    Type of Request: New information collection Requirement.
    Abstract: NHTSA is proposing to collect and aggregate information
from state level reporting entities that can be used to measure the
progress of 9-1-1 authorities across the country in enhancing their
existing operations and migrating to more advanced--Internet-Protocol-
enabled emergency networks. The data will be maintained in a ``National
9-1-1 Profile Database.'' One of the objectives of the National 9-1-1
Program is to develop, collect, and disseminate information concerning
practices, procedures, and technology used in the implementation of E9-
1-1 services and to support 9-1-1 Public Safety Answering Points
(PSAPs) and related state and local public safety agencies for 9-1-1
deployment and operations. The National 9-1-1 profile database can be
used to follow the progress of 9-1-1 authorities in enhancing their
existing systems and implementing next-generation networks for more
advanced systems.
    The goal of the data collection process is to support a national 9-
1-1 profile that will be used to help accurately measure and depict the
current status and planned capabilities of 9-1-1 systems across the
United States. Evaluations, based upon the data collected, will help
draw attention to key roadblocks and solutions in the deployment
process and to target possible future activities and resources
consistent with the goals of the program. The information in aggregated
form will be available to state and local stakeholders in the public
safety community.
    Affected Public: Under this proposed effort, NHTSA would
specifically request reporting entities to voluntarily collect and
annually report the data described above utilizing the described web-
based data collection tool. Reporting entities are state level 9-1-1
program officials, and the data reported will reflect state-level
aggregated data. Where a state statute has not established a state-
level 9-1-1 program, the authorized entity is the state E9-1-1
Coordinator designated under 47 U.S.C. 942(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    The total number of respondents is identified at fifty-six (56),
including the fifty states and the six U.S. Territories of Guam, U.S.
Minor Outlying Islands, American Samoa, Mariana Islands, U.S. Virgin
Islands, and Puerto Rico.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: NHTSA estimates that the time
required to annually report the data described utilizing the web-based
tool will be three hours (2 hours of preparation, 1 hour of entry to
Web site) per reporting entity, for a total of 168 hours for all
entities.
    The respondents would not incur any reporting costs from the
information collection beyond the time it takes to gather the
information, prepare it for reporting and then populate the web-based
data collection tool. The respondents also would not incur any
recordkeeping burden or recordkeeping costs from the information
collection.
    Send comments within 30 days, to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725-17th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention: NHTSA Desk Officer.
    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. A comment to OMB is most effective if

OMB receives it within 30 days of publication.

Jeffrey P. Michael,
Associate Administrator for Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2011-12757 Filed 5-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P