[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 57 (Tuesday, March 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 16320]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06415]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP14-206-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Refund Report in Docket Nos. RP14-206, RP08-426, RP10-
1398.
    Filed Date: 3/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140313-5035.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/25/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-619-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Cancellation of Rate Schedule X-50 to be effective 3/
13/2014.
    Filed Date: 3/13/14.
    Accession Number: 20140313-5122.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/25/14.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR Sec.  385.211 and Sec.  385.214) on or
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests
may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to
the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 14, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-06415 Filed 3-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 74717]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29303]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP15-250-000.
    Applicants: Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Amendment to Neg
Rate Agmt (BP K37-18) to be effective 12/6/2014.
    Filed Date: 12/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20141208-5205.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/22/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-251-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Amendment to Neg
Rate Agmt (Chevron 41610-4) to be effective 12/8/2014.
    Filed Date: 12/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20141208-5233.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/22/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-252-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: 12/08/14
Negotiated Rates--Cargill Incorporated (RTS) Amend 1 3085-23 to be
effective 12/8/2014.
    Filed Date: 12/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20141208-5301.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/22/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-253-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Intergrys Energy
Negotiated Rate to be effective 1/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 12/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20141208-5329.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/22/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-254-000.
    Applicants: WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Non-conforming
Service Agreement--DB Energy Cancellation to be effective 12/31/2014.
    Filed Date: 12/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20141208-5338.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/22/14.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP14-977-002.
    Applicants: East Cheyenne Gas Storage, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Amended Compliance
Filing in Response to Show Cause Order to be effective 10/16/2014.
    Filed Date: 11/26/14.
    Accession Number: 20141126-5078.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/8/14.

    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: December 9, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29303 Filed 12-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: May 16, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 94)]
[Notices]
[Page 27550]
[DOCID:fr16my07-57]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RP07-357-001 and CP05-92-004]

Liberty Gas Storage, LLC; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 9, 2007.
    Take notice that on May 7, 2007, Liberty Gas Storage LLC (Liberty)
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No.
1, the following revised tariff sheets:

First Revised Sheet No. 149
First Revised Sheet No. 154
First Revised Sheet No. 155

    Liberty states that the purpose of the filing is to comply with an
order issued by the Commission on April 13, 2007 in the above-
referenced dockets.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons

unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-9358 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 18839]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09038]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1431-000.
    Applicants: RE Astoria 2 LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Certificate of Concurrence
to Shared Facilities Agreement to be effective 4/21/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/24/18.
    Accession Number: 20180424-5176.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/15/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1432-000.
    Applicants: RE Gaskell West LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Certificate of Concurrence
to Shared Facilities Agreement to be effective 4/21/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/24/18.
    Accession Number: 20180424-5186.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/15/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1433-000.
    Applicants: RE Gaskell West 3 LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Certificate of Concurrence
to LGIA Co-Tenancy Agreement to be effective 4/21/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/24/18.
    Accession Number: 20180424-5213.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/15/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1434-000.
    Applicants: RE Gaskell West 4 LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Certificate of Concurrence
to LGIA Co-Tenancy Agreement to be effective 4/21/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/24/18.
    Accession Number: 20180424-5219.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/15/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1435-000.
    Applicants: RE Gaskell West 5 LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Certificate of Concurrence
to LGIA Co-Tenancy Agreement to be effective 4/21/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/24/18.
    Accession Number: 20180424-5221.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/15/18.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES18-29-000.
    Applicants: Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.
    Description: Update to April 16, 2018 Application of Orange and
Rockland Utilities, Inc. for an Order Authorizing the Issue and Sale of
Short-term Debt.
    Filed Date: 4/24/18.
    Accession Number: 20180424-5172.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/15/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 24, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-09038 Filed 4-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 49 (Friday, March 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13372-13373]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05850]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-RCRA-2015-0107; FRL-9924-26-OSWER]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Identification, Listing and Rulemaking Petitions
(Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to
submit an information collection request (ICR), Identification, Listing
and Rulemaking Petitions (Renewal) (EPA ICR No. 1189.25, OMB Control
No. 2050-0053) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review
and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Before doing so, the EPA is soliciting public
comments on specific aspects of the proposed information collection as
described below. This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is
currently approved through June 30, 2015. An Agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or May 12, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
RCRA-2015-0107, online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA Docket
Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Kaps, Materials Recovery and
Waste Management Division, Office of Resource Conservation and
Recovery, (5304P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the EPA is soliciting
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of
the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. The
EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval. At that time, the EPA will issue another Federal
Register notice to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the
opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB.
    Abstract: Under the authority of the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), as amended, Congress directed the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency to implement a comprehensive program
for the safe management of hazardous waste. In addition, Congress wrote
that ``[a]ny person may petition the Administrator for the
promulgation, amendment or repeal of any regulation'' under RCRA
(section 7004(a)).
    40 CFR parts 260 and 261 contain provisions that allow regulated
entities to apply for petitions, variances, exclusions, and exemptions
from various RCRA requirements.
    The following are some examples of information required from
petitioners under 40 CFR part 260. Under 40 CFR 260.20(b), all
rulemaking petitioners must submit basic information with their
demonstrations, including name, address, and statement of interest in
the proposed action. Under Sec.  260.21, all petitioners for equivalent
testing or analytical methods must include specific information in
their petitions and demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Administrator that the proposed method is equal to, or superior to, the
corresponding method in terms of its sensitivity, accuracy, and
reproducibility. Under Sec.  260.22, petitions to amend part 261 to
exclude a waste produced at a particular facility (more simply, to
delist a waste) must meet extensive informational requirements. When a
petition is submitted, the Agency reviews materials, deliberates,
publishes its tentative decision in the Federal Register, and requests
public comment. The EPA also may hold informal public hearings (if
requested by an interested person or at the discretion of the
Administrator) to hear oral comments on its tentative decision. After
evaluating all comments, the EPA publishes its final decision in the
Federal Register.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Business and other for-profit.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (RCRA 7004(a)).
    Estimated number of respondents: 2,603.
    Frequency of response: On occasion.
    Total estimated burden: 68,923 hours. Burden is defined at 5 CFR
1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $12,504,987, includes $9,660,864 annualized
O&M costs and $2,844,124 annualized labor costs.
    Changes in Estimates: The burden hours are likely to stay
substantially the same.

    Dated: February 25, 2015.
Barnes Johnson,
Director, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery.
[FR Doc. 2015-05850 Filed 3-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: October 17, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 202)]
[Notices]
[Page 61877]
[DOCID:fr17oc08-102]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0184]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office
of Management and Budget Approval; Temporary Marketing Permit
Applications

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
collection of information entitled ``Temporary Marketing Permit
Applications'' has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information
Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of June 23, 2008 (73
FR 35402), the agency announced that the proposed information
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0133.
The approval expires on August 31, 2011. A copy of the supporting
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet
at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: October 9, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-24671 Filed 10-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 52000]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20757]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL14-92-000]

Notice of Petition for Declaratory Order

Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02SE14.001

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02SE14.002

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Sovereign Power, Inc., 84 FERC ] 61,014 (1998). Confederated
Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon, 93 FERC ] 61,182
(2000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on September 19, 2014.

    Dated: August 25, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-20757 Filed 8-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: November 29, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 228)]
[Notices]
[Page 71572-71573]
[DOCID:fr29no05-109]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-52815; File No. SR-CHX-2005-31]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to Participant Fees
and Credits

November 21, 2005.

    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 24, 2005, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the CHX. On November
7, 2005, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change.\3\ The Exchange filed the proposed rule change pursuant section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \4\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \5\ thereunder, which
renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Amendment No. 1 replaced the original filing in its
entirety.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The CHX proposes to amend its Participant Fee Schedule (``Fee
Schedule'') to modify the trading permit fee due the Exchange from a
participant if the participant's trading permit is cancelled intrayear
and to establish a fee associated with a participant's change of name
or corporate form.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the CHX included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule changes and
discussed any comments it received regarding the proposal. The text of
these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV
below. The CHX has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and
C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule to modify the
trading permit fee due the Exchange from a participant if the trading
permit is cancelled intrayear and to establish a fee associated with a
participant's change of name or corporate form. The provisions of the
Fee Schedule relating to trading permits are relatively new provisions
that were added when the Exchange demutualized on February 9, 2005 and
issued trading permits upon demutualization and thereafter. Although
from a financial perspective, the amount of the trading permit fee
($6,000 per year) is equivalent to pre-demutualization member dues, in
fact, trading permits operate much differently than seats on the
Exchange. With very limited exceptions, a trading permit cannot be
sold, leased, or transferred, and cannot be retained by a participant
if the participant is not using the trading permit to trade on the
Exchange.
    As originally drafted, the Fee Schedule contemplated that each
participant would be obligated to pay the entire $6,000 annual trading
permit fee, regardless of when the trading permit was cancelled during
the year. The Exchange believes that it is appropriate to amend the Fee
Schedule to provide for some fee relief for participants whose trading
permits are cancelled intrayear. The Exchange also believes that it is
necessary for the Exchange to have an adequate basis on which to budget
and project annual revenues. Accordingly, the Exchange is proposing a
change that would provide for the participant to pay, upon intrayear
cancellation, the lesser of $2,000 or the then-outstanding balance of
the annual fee. This compromise ensures that the Exchange can budget
for at least $2,000 in annual revenue per trading permit, while
affording a participant a reduction in the annual trading permit fee if
the permit is cancelled early in the year.
    The Exchange also proposes to establish a $200 fee per trading
permit that a participant would be charged if the participant firm
changed its name or its corporate form. This fee would be charged, for
example, if a participant firm changed its name from ``XYZ
Corporation'' to ``XY Corporation'' or if the participant firm changed
its corporate form from a corporation to a limited liability company.
Although trading permits generally are not transferable, the Exchange
believes it would work a hardship on participants if they were required
to obtain new trading permits (and to pay the permit fee on the
existing permit, as described above) whenever participant firms changed
names or corporate forms.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with section 6(b)(4) of the Act \6\ in that it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among
its members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change, as
amended, would impose any burden on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change, as amended, establishes or changes a
due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange and therefore has
become effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\8\ At any time within 60
days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may
summarily abrogate such rule change, if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purpose of the Act.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
    \9\ For purposes of calculating the 60-day period within which
the Commission may summarily abrogate the proposed rule change under
section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission considers that period
to commence on November 7, 2005, the date the Exchange filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. See 15 U.S.C.
78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with

the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-CHX-2005-31 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-9303.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CHX-2005-31. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal offices of the CHX. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-CHX-2005-31 and should be submitted on or before
December 20, 2005.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-6661 Filed 11-28-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 14390]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6050]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD11-3-008]

Review of Cost Submittals by Other Federal Agencies for
Administering Part I of the Federal Power Act; Notice of Technical
Conference

    In an order issued on October 8, 2004, the Commission set forth a
guideline for Other Federal Agencies (OFAs) to submit their costs
related to Administering Part I of the Federal Power Act. Order On
Rehearing Consolidating Administrative Annual Charges Bill Appeals And
Modifying Annual Charges Billing Procedures, 109 FERC ] 61,040 (2004)
(October 8 Order). The Commission required OFAs to submit their costs
using the OFA Cost Submission Form. The October 8 Order also announced
that a technical conference would be held for the purpose of reviewing
the submitted cost forms and detailed supporting documentation.
    The Commission will hold a technical conference for reviewing the
submitted OFA costs. The purpose of the conference will be for OFAs and
licensees to discuss costs reported in the forms and any other
supporting documentation or analyses.
    The technical conference will be held on March 24, 2011, in
Conference Room 3M-3 at the Commission's headquarters, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC. The technical conference will begin at 2
p.m. (EDT).
    The technical conference will also be transcribed. Those interested
in obtaining a copy of the transcript immediately for a fee should
contact the Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc., at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or 1-800-336-
6646. Two weeks after the post-forum meeting, the transcript will be
available for free on the Commission's e-library system. Anyone without
access to the Commission's Web site or who has questions about the
technical conference should contact W. Doug Foster at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
via e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please
send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll free (866) 208-
3372 (voice),<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY), or send a FAX to<PHONE_NUMBER> with
the required accommodations.

    Dated: March 9, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-6050 Filed 3-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


From:	Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US To:	"Frey, Nathan J."<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc:	Eloise Shepherd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Beth Hassett-Sipple"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>"Rosalina Rodriguez"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>"Karen Martin"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>"Bryan Hubbell"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>"Darryl Weatherhead"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Date:	06/04/2012 11:48 PM Subject:	Re: follow up calls tomorrow

Thank you Nathan for letting me know you got my message and have scheduled the calls.  Eloise will send you the schedule notices in the morning so that you can send them to the appropriate people for each call.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Frey, Nathan J."<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: 06/05/2012 02:42 AM GMT To: Lydia Wegman Cc: Eloise Shepherd Subject: follow up calls tomorrow

Hi Lydia,

I received your voicemail from a bit after 6:00pm tonight and I just wanted to circle back with you about scheduling follow up calls tomorrow.  As we discussed, I have scheduled the follow up interagency discussion for 10:00 am tomorrow.  In addition, I have held 1:00 - 2:30 with folks here to follow up on the remaining issues that we did not touch on in today's call and I have also held 3:00 - 4:00 to discuss the RIA.

Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss.  Happy to chat before our first call if you like.

Thanks,

Nathan


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38730-38733]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17170]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-81362; File No. SR-Phlx-2017-61]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the
Exchange's Pricing Schedule

August 9, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 31, 2017 NASDAQ PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's Pricing Schedule to:
(i) Increase the Options Transaction Charge for Specialists and Market
Makers who engage in NDX transactions on the Exchange Floor; (ii)
exclude NDX transactions from the Exchange's Monthly Firm Fee Cap that
otherwise applies to the monthly transaction fees that market
participants incur when trading on the Exchange; and (iii) exempt NDX
transactions from the Exchange's waiver of Options Transaction Charges
for certain facilitation orders.
    While these amendments are effective upon filing, the Exchange has
designated the proposed amendments to be operative on August 1, 2017.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://nasdaqphlx.cchwallstreet. com/, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to make three changes to Section II of its
Pricing Schedule. First, the Exchange proposes to increase its Options
Transaction Charge for Specialists and Market Makers that engage in NDX
transactions on the Exchange Floor. Last March, the Exchange increased
its Options Transaction Charges from $0.25 to $0.75 per contract for
all categories of market participants transacting in NDX, except for
Specialists and Market Makers which transact in NDX on the Floor and

Customers.\3\ At that time, the Exchange decided not to raise its $0.35
per contract Option Transaction Charge for Specialists and Market
Makers transacting in NDX on the Floor because it sought to incentivize
Specialists and Market Makers to continue to make markets in the NDX
product on the Floor. However, the Exchange has decided to discontinue
this incentive program and, as such, the Exchange now seeks to increase
the Transaction Charge to $0.75 per contract. This proposal will
harmonize the schedule of NDX Options Transaction Charges for all non-
Customer market participants in all circumstances in which they trade
in NDX on the Exchange in that it will charge them the same per
contract fee and will do so for both Floor-based and electronic
transactions (except that the Exchange will continue to refrain from
imposing an Options Transaction Charge on Customers that engage in NDX
transactions). Moreover, the fee increase will permit the Exchange to
recoup its operational costs for listing NDX, which is a proprietary
product of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-80244 (March 13,
2017), 82 FR 14388 (March 20, 2017). The categories of market
participants that incur an Options Transaction Charge of $0.75 per
contract when they transact in NDX include Professionals (both
electronic and Floor trading), Specialists and Market Makers
(electronic trading only), Broker-Dealers (both electronic and Floor
Trading), and Firms (both electronic and Floor trading).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, the Exchange proposes to exempt NDX Options Transaction
Charges from the $75,000 Monthly Firm Fee Cap that it otherwise applies
to member organizations that trade on the Exchange in their own
proprietary accounts. The Exchange bases this proposal upon a similar
exemption that CBOE applies from its $75,000 monthly transaction fee
cap for its proprietary options index products, including VIX and
SPX.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc., Fees Schedule
(July 11, 2017), at n.22 (``For all non-facilitation business
executed in AIM or open outcry, or as a QCC or FLEX transaction,
transaction fees for Clearing Trading Permit Holder Proprietary and/
or their Non-Trading Permit Holder Affiliates (as defined in
footnote 11) in all products except Underlying Symbol List A (34),
excluding binary options, in the aggregate, are capped at $75,000
per month per Clearing Trading Permit Holder. As CBOE assesses no
Clearing Trading Permit Holder Proprietary transaction fees for
facilitation orders (other than Underlying Symbol List A (34),
excluding binary options) (as described in footnote 11), such trades
will not count towards the cap. Surcharge fees do not count towards
the cap.''); id. at n.34 (defining ``Underlying Symbol List A'' to
include SPX and VIX).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Third, the Exchange proposes to exclude NDX Options Transactions
from several waivers that it otherwise grants to certain categories of
market participants of its Floor Options Transaction Charges.
Specifically, the Exchange will not waive Firm Floor Options
Transaction Charges for members that execute NDX facilitation orders
when such members trade in their own proprietary account (including
Cabinet Options Transaction Charges). Also, the Exchange will not waive
Firm Floor Options Transaction Charges for the buy side of an NDX
transaction if the same member or its affiliates under Common Ownership
represents both sides of a Firm transaction when such members are
trading in their own proprietary account. Lastly, the Exchange will not
waive the Broker-Dealer Floor Options Transaction Charge (including
Cabinet Options Transaction Charges) for members that execute NDX
facilitation in their own proprietary account contra to a Customer
(``BD-Customer Facilitation''), where the member's BD-Customer
Facilitation average daily volume (including both FLEX and non-FLEX
transactions) exceeds 10,000 contracts per day in a given month. The
Exchange intends for these exclusions to help it recoup its costs of
developing and maintaining NDX as a proprietary product. Again,
moreover, this proposal is consistent with an exclusion for proprietary
products that CBOE applies to fee waivers involving facilitation
orders.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See id. (noting that CBOE excludes its proprietary products
from its $0.00 charge for facilitation orders).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\6\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and issuers and other persons using any facility, and is
not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation
NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market
model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.'' \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70
FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Likewise, in NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission \9\
(``NetCoalition'') the D.C. Circuit upheld the Commission's use of a
market-based approach in evaluating the fairness of market data fees
against a challenge claiming that Congress mandated a cost-based
approach.\10\ As the court emphasized, the Commission ``intended in
Regulation NMS that `market forces, rather than regulatory
requirements' play a role in determining the market data . . . to be
made available to investors and at what cost.'' \11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
    \10\ See NetCoalition, at 534-535.
    \11\ Id. at 537.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is
`fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of
order flow from broker dealers'. . . .'' \12\ Although the court and
the SEC were discussing the cash equities markets, the Exchange
believes that these views apply with equal force to the options
markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Id. at 539 (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No.
59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008)
(SR-NYSEArca-2006-21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that its proposal to increase its Option
Transaction Charges for Specialists and Market Makers transacting in
NDX on the Floor is reasonable because the Exchange already charges
Specialists and Market Makers $0.75 per contract for electronic
transactions involving NDX as well the same amount for Professionals,
Broker-Dealers, and Firms that engage in NDX transactions both
electronically and on the Floor. The proposal, in other words, will
bring the Exchange's Pricing Schedule for Option Transaction Charges
into harmony, except for Customers. The Exchange also believes that its
proposal is an equitable allocation and is not unfairly discriminatory
because the Exchange will apply the same Options Transaction Charges to
all similarly situated market participants, except for Customers.

    The Exchange believes that its decision to refrain from assessing
to Customers Options Transaction Charges for NDX is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because Customer orders bring valuable
liquidity to the market, which benefits other market participants.
Customer liquidity benefits all market participants by providing more
trading opportunities, which attracts Specialists and Market Makers. An
increase in these in the activity of these market participants, in
turn, facilitates tighter spreads, which may cause an additional
corresponding increase in order flow from other market participants.
    The Exchange also believes that its proposal to exempt NDX from the
Monthly Firm Fee Cap on Options Transaction Charges is reasonable
because CBOE employs a similar exemption from its monthly option
transaction fee cap for transactions in its proprietary products.\13\
This proposal is an equitable allocation and is not unfairly
discriminatory because the Exchange will apply the same fee to all
similarly situated members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc., Fees Schedule,
supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange believes that its proposal is reasonable to
exclude NDX from the waivers of Options Transaction Charges that it
otherwise grants in certain circumstances involving the execution of
facilitation orders. Again, the Exchange's proposal is similar to that
which CBOE employs with respect to facilitation orders involving its
proprietary products. The Exchange also believes this proposal is
reasonable insofar as the Exchange incurs costs associated with the
development and maintenance of NDX as a proprietary product and the
exclusion from the fee waiver will help it to recoup those costs.
Furthermore, the Exchange believes that this proposal is an equitable
allocation and is not unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange will
apply the same fee waiver exclusion to all similarly situated members.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In terms of inter-market
competition, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive, or rebate opportunities available at other venues to be more
favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust
its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges and with
alternative trading systems that have been exempted from compliance
with the statutory standards applicable to exchanges. Because
competitors are free to modify their own fees in response, and because
market participants may readily adjust their order routing practices,
the Exchange believes that the degree to which fee changes in this
market may impose any burden on competition is extremely limited.
    In this instance, the proposed increase to the Options Transaction
Charge for Specialists and Market Makers engaging in Floor-based MDX
transactions does not impose a burden on competition because the
increase will result in the Exchange uniformly assessing a $0.75 per
contract Options Transaction charge for all market participants, except
Customers, regardless of whether the transaction is submitted
electronically or on the Floor.
    The Exchange believes that assessing Customers no transaction fees
for NDX does not impose an undue burden on intramarket competition
because Customer orders bring valuable liquidity to the market, which
benefits other market participants. Customer liquidity benefits all
market participants by providing more trading opportunities, which
attracts Specialists and Market Makers. An increase in these in the
activity of these market participants, in turn, facilitates tighter
spreads, which may cause an additional corresponding increase in order
flow from other market participants.
    The Exchange does not believe that its proposals to exempt NDX from
its Monthly Firm Fee Cap and to exclude NDX transactions from its fee
waivers for certain facilitation transactions will impose a burden
competition. These proposals are similar to CBOE's practices with
respect to its proprietary products.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2017-61 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2017-61. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from

submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
Phlx-2017-61 and should be submitted on or before September 5, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-17170 Filed 8-14-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: January 12, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 8)]
[Notices]
[Page 1513-1514]
[DOCID:fr12ja07-70]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0913; FRL-8105-3]

Notice of Filing of a Pesticide Petition for a Time-Extension of
the Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance for Residues of
Bacillus thuringiensis VIP3A913 Protein and the Genetic Material
Necessary for Its Production on Cotton Commodities

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the initial filing of a pesticide
petition proposing the 3 year extension until May 1, 2010, of the
current exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for the
biopesticide, Bacillus thuringiensis VIP3A913 protein and the genetic
material necessary for its production, in or on the commodity cotton.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 12, 2007.

ADDRESSES:  Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0913 and pesticide petition number (PP)
3G6547, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal:  http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
telephone number for the Docket Facility is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2006-0913. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The Federal regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
     Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket
index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov
, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP

Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. The hours of operation
of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number
is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leonard Cole, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division, (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).

     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

     1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
     2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    EPA is printing a summary of each pesticide petition received under
section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21
U.S.C. 346a, proposing the establishment or amendment of regulations in
40 CFR part 180 for residues of pesticide chemicals in or on various
food commodities. EPA has determined that this pesticide petition
contains data or information regarding the elements set forth in FFDCA
section 408(d)(2); however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency
of the submitted data at this time or whether the data support granting
of the pesticide petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA
rules on this pesticide petition.
    Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a summary of the petition included in
this notice, prepared by the petitioner along with a description of the
analytical method available for the detection and measurement of the
pesticide chemical residues is available on EPA's Electronic Docket at
http://www.regulations.gov. To locate this information on the home page

of EPA's Electronic Docket, select ``Quick Search'' and type the OPP
docket ID number. Once the search has located the docket, clicking on
the ``Docket ID'' will bring up a list of all documents in the docket
for the pesticide including the petition summary.

 Exemption from Tolerance

    (PP) 3G6547. Syngenta Seeds, Inc., 3054 Cornwallis Road, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27709-2257, proposes a time-extension for 3 years
until May 1, 2010, for the current exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of the biopesticide, Bacillus thuringiensis
VIP3A913 protein and the genetic material necessary for its production,
in or on the commodity cotton. Because this petition is a request for
an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance without numerical
limitations, no analytical method is required.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives,
Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    Dated: December 21, 2006.
Janet L. Andersen
Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. E7-253 Filed 1-11-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 61582]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19307]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER23-2728-000]

All Clean Power, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
All Clean Power, LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is September 20, 2023.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners,
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is
encouraged to contact OPP at<PHONE_NUMBER> or [email protected].

    Dated: August 31, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-19307 Filed 9-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: January 30, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 19)]
[Notices]
[Page 4255]
[DOCID:fr30ja07-55]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-115-001]

Gas Transmission Northwest Corporation; Notice of Compliance
Filing

January 23, 2007.
    Take notice that on January 22, 2007, Gas Transmission Northwest
Corporation (GTN) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff,
Third Revised Volume No. 1-A, Fourth Revised Sheet No. 138, to be
effective January 19, 2007.
    GTN states that copies of the filing were served on parties on the
official service list in the above-captioned proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons

unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-1368 Filed 1-29-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P