[Federal Register: April 12, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 70)]
[Notices]
[Page 18504-18505]
[DOCID:fr12ap07-93]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-55593; File No. SR-NYSE-2004-56]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange Inc. (n/k/
a New York Stock Exchange LLC); Notice of Filing and Order Granting
Accelerated Approval to Proposed Rule Change Relating to Amendments to
Exchange Rule 611, ``Disqualification or Other Disability of
Arbitrators''

April 6, 2007.

I. Introduction

    On October 12, 2004, the New York Stock Exchange Inc. (n/k/a New
York Stock Exchange LLC) (``NYSE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change amending NYSE Rule
611 (``Disqualification or other Disability of Arbitrators'') to give
the Director of Arbitration the authority to remove an arbitrator in
the event a conflict comes to the attention of the parties or the
Exchange that, for any reason, was not appropriately disclosed pursuant
to NYSE rules. On May 26, 2006, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to
the proposed rule change (``Amendment No. 1'').\3\ The proposed rule
change, as amended by Amendment No. 1, was published for comment in the
Federal Register on August 7, 2006.\4\ The Commission received one
comment on the proposal, as amended.\5\ On January 11, 2007, the NYSE
filed Amendment No. 2 (``Amendment No. 2''),\6\ and on March 21, 2007,
the Exchange filed Amendment No. 3 (``Amendment No. 3'') \7\ to the
proposed rule change. This order approves the proposed rule change, as
amended, on an accelerated basis, and solicits comment from interested
persons on the proposed rule change as modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and
3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ In Amendment No. 1, which supplemented the original filing,
the Exchange amended the filing to note that the need to remove an
arbitrator might arise from a failure to disclose information that
should have been disclosed, or from a conflict that arises after the
commencement of the hearing. The Exchange also amended the filing to
eliminate the proposal to provide the Director of Arbitration with
discretion to limit a party's additional information requests of an
arbitrator.
    \4\ See Exchange Act Release No. 54233 (July 27, 2006), 71 FR
44751 (Aug. 7, 2006) (the ``Notice'').
    \5\ See letter from Seth E. Lipner (Aug. 28, 2006) (``Lipner
Letter'').
    \6\ In Amendment No. 2, which supplemented the original filing,
the Exchange modified the proposed rule to provide that the Director
of Arbitration may remove an arbitrator from a panel based on
information that was not known to the parties when the arbitrator
was appointed. Amendment No. 2 also limited the reasons for which
the Director of Arbitration may remove an arbitrator to information
not known to the parties when the arbitrator was appointed and
information required to be disclosed pursuant to NYSE Rule 610 that
was not previously disclosed. The rule, as amended by Amendment No.
1, had not required the parties to be unaware of the information
serving as the basis for the Director of Arbitration's decision, and
had not limited the reasons for removal of the arbitrator.
    \7\ In Amendment No. 3, which supplemented the original filing,
the Exchange corrected an ambiguity in Amendment No. 2. Amendment
No. 3 clarified that the Director of Arbitration could remove an
arbitrator for information that should have been disclosed pursuant
to NYSE Rule 610, providing for disclosure of conflicts, and that
either was not known to the parties prior to the commencement of the
hearing, or that represented a new conflict, arising after the
commencement of the hearing. The amendment also clarified that the
Director of Arbitration could also remove an arbitrator where
circumstances known to the parties before the commencement of the
hearing developed into a conflict after the commencement of the
hearing. The rule as amended by Amendment No. 2 did not clearly
establish these requirements for removal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change

A. Description of the Proposal

    At present, once an arbitrator has taken the Oath of Arbitrators
for a particular case, NYSE rules do not provide for the Director of
Arbitration to remove an arbitrator from serving on that case. Rather,
NYSE Rule 610 permits the Director of Arbitration to remove an
arbitrator prior to, but not after, the commencement of the hearing.
The need to remove a sitting arbitrator could arise if, for example, an
item that should have been disclosed by the arbitrator pursuant to
Exchange rules had not been disclosed, or a conflict arises after
commencement of the hearing. Historically, when this situation has
arisen, the remedy has been for the arbitrator to recuse himself or
herself. Nevertheless, the Exchange proposed to amend its rules,
indicating that it would be prudent to give the Director of Arbitration
the authority to remove an arbitrator in the event a conflict comes to
the attention of the parties or the Exchange that for any reason was
not appropriately disclosed pursuant to NYSE rules and was unknown to
the parties, or if a conflict arises after the commencement of the
hearing.

B. Comment Summary and NYSE's Response

1. Comments Received
    The proposal was published for comment in the Federal Register on
August 7, 2006,\8\ and the Commission received one comment.\9\ The
commenter generally supported the proposed rule change, but expressed
concern that it would not sufficiently protect against possible
gamesmanship or delays in seeking to remove arbitrators. In the
commenter's view, a party who is aware of grounds for removal but does
not act should be prevented from bringing a later challenge to remove
the arbitrator.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Notice, supra note 4.
    \9\ See Lipner Letter, supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. NYSE's Response to Comments
    The NYSE responded to the commenter's concerns by filing Amendment
No. 2 to the proposed rule change, providing that the Director of
Arbitration may remove an arbitrator from an arbitration panel solely
for information not disclosed pursuant to NYSE Rule 610 or based on
information not known to the parties when the arbitrator was appointed.
Subsequently, the NYSE filed Amendment No. 3, correcting an ambiguity
in the rule, and clearly setting forth that the grounds for removal
from the panel would be either a new conflict, arising after the
commencement of the hearing (whether arising from circumstances known
to the parties prior to the commencement of the hearing but only
developing into a conflict after the commencement of the hearing, or
from circumstances arising after the hearing), or, alternatively, an
undisclosed conflict of which the parties were previously unaware.

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \10\ in general and
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \11\ in particular, which require that the
rules of the Exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest.\12\ The proposed rule change, as amended, enables the
Director of Arbitration to remove an arbitrator when a conflict arises
after the commencement of the hearing or when information required to
be disclosed pursuant to Exchange Rule 610 and of which the parties
were previously unaware, is not disclosed. Similarly, the proposed rule
change also permits an arbitrator to be removed where circumstances
known before the commencement of the hearing develop into a conflict
after the commencement of the hearing. Enabling the Director of
Arbitration to remove arbitrators with any of these conflicts if they
fail to recuse themselves will address circumstances in which an
arbitrator with a conflict could otherwise continue serving on a panel.
We believe that allowing the Director of Arbitration to exercise this
authority will facilitate the removal of arbitrators with either
previously undisclosed and unknown conflicts or newly-arising conflicts
(whether from known or unknown circumstances), and will therefore
enhance the fairness and transparency of the arbitration process.
Accelerated Approval of the Proposed Rule Change as Modified by
Amendment Nos. 2 and 3. The Commission finds good cause for approving
the proposed rule change as modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and 3 to the
proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after the amendment is
published for comment in the Federal Register pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act.\13\ Amendment No. 2 responded to a comment by
providing that parties aware of conflicts prior to the time that the
arbitrator was appointed could not delay action on that knowledge.
Amendment No. 3, which clarified Amendment No. 2, set forth the two
grounds for removal of an arbitrator after commencement of the hearing:
first, a conflict arising after the commencement of the hearing; and
second, a failure to disclose information pursuant to Rule 610 if the
parties were previously unaware of the undisclosed information. The
Commission finds that, given the concerns the commenter raised with
respect to the possibility that the arbitration process might be
manipulated by parties seeking to remove an arbitrator based on
information known to a party at an earlier date but acted upon only
after the party assessed the arbitrator, it is appropriate and
responsive for the Exchange to amend the proposed rule change to
provide that an arbitrator cannot be removed after taking the oath of
arbitration for a particular case based on a conflict of which the
parties were previously aware. In essence, the rule provides that
parties who come into knowledge of a conflict may not delay before
requesting removal of an arbitrator. Similarly, the Commission believes
that it is appropriate to permit the Director of Arbitration to remove
an arbitrator for whom a conflict arises after commencement of the
hearing, as the NYSE rules do not presently provide for such removal.
Accordingly, the Commission finds good cause to accelerate approval of
the proposed rule change, as amended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \12\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission
notes that it has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the proposed rule change as modified by Amendment
Nos. 2 and 3, including whether Amendment Nos. 2 and 3 are consistent
with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following
methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include File

Number SR-NYSE-2004-56 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2004-56. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the NYSE. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSE-2004-56 and should be submitted on or before May 3,
2007.

V. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act
\14\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2004-56), as amended, be,
and hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-6935 Filed 4-11-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 22, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40483-40485]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14789]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-2042; Directorate Identifier 2016-NE-02-AD;
Amendment 39-18568; AD 2016-13-04]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; BRP-Powertrain GmbH & Co KG
Reciprocating Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
BRP-Powertrain GmbH & Co KG Rotax 912 F2, 912 F3, 912 F4, 912 S2, 912
S3, 912 S4, 914 F2, 914 F3, and 914 F4 reciprocating engines. This AD
requires re-identification of the engine model and concurrent
modification of the aircraft to indicate the maximum coolant
temperature limit. This AD was prompted by a design change introduced
by the manufacturer that relocated the engine cylinder head temperature
sensor to a different location and converted it to a coolant
temperature sensor. We are issuing this AD to prevent exceeding engine
coolant temperature limits, which could result in loss of engine
coolant, damage to the engine, and loss of control of the airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective July 27, 2016.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of July 27,
2016.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact BRP-Powertrain GmbH & Co KG, Rotaxstrasse 1, A-4623
Gunskirchen, Austria; phone: +43 7246 6010; fax: +43 7246 601 9130;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.FLYROTAX.com. You
may view this service information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is
also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-2042.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
2042; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI), the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The address for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
Document Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Green, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 781-
238-7199; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to the specified products. The
NPRM was published in the Federal Register on March 18, 2016 (81 FR
14804). The NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    A design change of the engine cylinder heads was introduced by
BRP-Powertrain in March 2013 which modifies the engine/aircraft
interfaces by substituting the previous cylinder head temperature
(CHT) measurement (limit temperature 135 [deg]C/150 [deg]C) with a
coolant temperature (CT) measurement (limit temperature 120 [deg]C).
    The design change was communicated on 15 May 2013 by BRP-
Powertrain Service Instruction (SI) 912-020R7/914-022R7 (single
document) but was not identified by a change of the engine model
designation or of the engine P/N but only through the cylinder head
P/N and the position of the temperature sensor.
    Consequently, engines with the new cylinder heads (installed
during production or replaced in-service during maintenance) may be
installed on an aircraft without concurrent modification of that
aircraft, instructions for which should be provided by the type
certificate (TC) holder or the supplemental type certificate (STC)
holder, as applicable. In this case, the coolant temperature with a
maximum engine operating limit of 120 [deg]C (valid for engines
operated with water diluted glycol coolant) is displayed on a CHT
indicator with a typical limit marking (red radial/range) of more
than 120 [deg]C.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-2042.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (81 FR 14804, March 18,
2016).

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed expect for
minor editorial changes. We determined that these changes will not
increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of
this AD.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    BRP-Powertrain GmbH & Co KG has issued Service Bulletin (SB) SB-
912-068/SB-914-049 (one document), dated April 16, 2015. The service
information describes procedures for re-identification of the type
plate for certain BRP-Powertrain GmbH & Co KG Rotax 912 and 914
engines. This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects about 40 engines installed on
aircraft of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take about 5
hours per engine to inspect and re-identify the type plate. The average
labor rate is $85 per hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of this AD on U.S. operators to be $17,000.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2016-13-04 BRP-Powertrain GmbH & Co KG (formerly BRP-Rotax GmbH & Co
KG, Bombardier-Rotax GmbH & Co. KG, and Bombardier-Rotax GmbH):
Amendment 39-18568; Docket No. FAA-2016-2042; Directorate Identifier
2016-NE-02-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective July 27, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to BRP-Powertrain GmbH & Co KG Rotax model 912
F2, 912 F3, 912 F4, 912 S2, 912 S3, 912 S4, 914 F2, 914 F3, and 914
F4 reciprocating engines with a cylinder head that has a part number
(P/N) listed in Figure 1 to paragraph (c) of this AD and that is
installed in position 2 or 3.

Figure 1 to Paragraph (c) of This AD--Post-Modification Cylinder Head P/
                                    N
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Engine model                       Cylinder head P/N
------------------------------------------------------------------------
912 F2, 912 F3, 912 F4, 914 F2, 914 F3,     P/N 413235 or P/N 413236.
 and 914 F4.
912 S2, 912 S3, and 912 S4................  P/N 413185.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(d) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a design change introduced by the
manufacturer that relocated the engine cylinder head temperature
sensor to a new location and converted it to a coolant temperature
sensor. We are issuing this AD to prevent exceeding coolant
temperature limits, which could result in loss of engine coolant,
damage to the engine, and loss of control of the airplane.

(e) Actions and Compliance

    Comply with this AD within 6 months after the effective date of
this AD, unless already done.
    (1) For engines with cylinder heads that have a P/N listed in
Figure 1 to paragraph (c) of this AD installed on both position 2
and position 3, change the engine model designation on the engine
type data plate to include a ``-01'' suffix. Use paragraph 3.1.1 of
BRP-Powertrain Service Bulletin (SB) SB-912-068/SB-914-049, dated
April 16, 2015, to make this change.
    (2) For engines with only one cylinder head having a P/N listed
in Figure 1 to paragraph (c) of this AD installed in position 2 or
3, do one of the following:
    (i) Replace the cylinder head having a P/N listed in Figure 1 to
paragraph (c) of this AD with a P/N 623682 cylinder head on Rotax
912 F2, 912 F3, 912 F4, 914 F2, 914 F3, and 914 F4 engines and with
a P/N 623687 cylinder head on Rotax 912 S2, 912 S3, and 912 S4
engines. If you complete the actions in paragraph (e)(2)(i), no
further action is required. Or,
    (ii) Install cylinder heads identified in Figure 1 to paragraph
(c) of this AD on both cylinder head positions 2 and 3 and change
the engine model designation of the engine type data plate in
accordance with paragraph (e)(1) of this AD.
    (3) For engines re-identified in accordance with paragraph
(e)(1) or (e)(2)(ii) of this AD, before further flight, modify the
aircraft cockpit instrumentation and related documentation to
indicate a maximum coolant temperature limit of 120 degrees Celsius
using FAA-approved procedures. These re-identified engines remain
eligible for installation on approved aircraft-engine combinations.

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request. You may email your request to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(g) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Robert Green,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For more information about the installation modifications
described in paragraph (e)(3) of this AD, contact Jim Rutherford,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust Ave.
Room 301, Kansas City, MO; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (3) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency, AD 2015-0240,
dated December 18, 2015, for more information. You may examine the
MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating it in Docket No. FAA-2016-2042.
    (4) The following aircraft service information, which are not
incorporated by reference in this AD, contain FAA-approved
procedures for complying with paragraph (e)(3) of this AD and can be
obtained from BRP-Powertrain GmbH & Co. KG, using the contact
information in paragraph (h)(3) of this AD:

  Figure 2 to Paragraph (g) of This AD--Aircraft Type/Model and Service
                               Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Type/model(s)                             SB
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aquila AT01.............................  SB-AT01-029.
TECNAM P92, P2002 and P2006T............  SB-183-CS.
TECNAM P2008 JC.........................  SB-185-CS.
Diamond H 36 ``Dimona'' and HK 36         OSB 36-111.
 ``Super Dimona''.
Diamond DV 20 ``Katana''................  OSB 20-066.
Diamond (Canada) DA20-A1 ``Katana''.....  SB Da20-72-04.
M&D AVO 68 ``Samburo''..................  TM 808-31.

Scheibe SF 25 C and SF 36 R.............  SI_02-14.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(h) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) BRP-Powertrain Service Bulletin SB-912-068/SB-914-049 (one
document), dated April 16, 2015.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For BRP-Powertrain service information identified in this
AD, contact BRP-Powertrain GmbH & Co. KG, Rotaxstrasse 1, A-4623
Gunskirchen, Austria; phone: +43 7246 6010; fax: +43 7246 601 9130;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: www.flyrotax.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
781-238-7125.
    (5) You may view this service information at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to:
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on June 14, 2016.
Colleen M. D'Alessandro,
Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-14789 Filed 6-21-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P