[Federal Register: June 1, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 105)]
[Notices]
[Page 30574-30575]
[DOCID:fr01jn07-64]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IC07-542-000; FERC-542]

Commission Information Collection Activities, Proposed
Collection; Comment Request; Extension

May 25, 2007.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of section 3506(c)(2)(a)
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. No. 104-13), the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is soliciting public
comment on the specific aspects of the information collection described
below.

DATES: Comments on the collection of information are due August 3,
2007.

ADDRESSES: Copies of sample filings of the proposed collection of
information can be obtained from the Commission's Web site (http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filings/elibrary.asp
) or from the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, Attn: Michael Miller, Office of the Executive
Director, ED-34, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Comments
may be filed either in paper format or electronically. Those parties
filing electronically do not need to make a paper filing. For paper
filing, the original and 14 copies of such comments should be submitted
to the Secretary of the Commission, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426 and refer to
Docket No. IC07-542-000.
    Documents filed electronically via the Internet must be prepared in
WordPerfect, MS Word, Portable Document Format, or ASCII format. To
file the document, access the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov
, choose the Documents & Filings tab, click on eFiling,

then follow the instructions given. First time users will have to
establish a user name and password. The Commission will send an
automatic acknowledgement to the sender's e-mail address upon receipt
of comments.
    All comments may be viewed, printed or downloaded remotely via the
Internet through FERC's homepage using the eLibrary link. For user
assistance, contact<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at (866)
208-3676 or for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Miller may be reached by
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, by fax at

(202) 273-0873, and by e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information collected under the
requirements of FERC-542 ``Gas Pipeline Rates: Rate Tracking'' (OMB No.
1902-0070) is used by the Commission to implement the statutory
provisions of Title IV of the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA), 15 U.S.C.
3301-3432, and Sections 4, 5 and 16 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) (Pub.
L.) 75-688) (15 U.S.C. 717-717w). These statutes empower the Commission
to collect natural gas transmission cost information from interstate
natural gas transporters for the purpose of verifying that these costs,
which are passed on to pipeline customers, are just and reasonable.
    Interstate natural gas pipeline companies are required by the
Commission to track their transportation associated costs to allow for
the Commission's review and where appropriate, approval of the pass-
through of these costs to pipeline customers. Most of these FERC-542
tracking filings are monthly accountings of the cost of fuel or
electric power necessary to operate compressor stations. Others track
the costs of (1) Gas Research Institutes fees; (2) annual charges of
various types, and (3) other types of rate adjustments.
    Tracking filings may be submitted at any time or on a regularly
scheduled basis in accordance with the pipeline company's tariff.
Filings may be either: (1) Accepted; (2) suspended and set for hearing;
(3) suspended, but not set for hearing; or (4) suspended for further
review, such as technical conference or some other type of Commission
action. The Commission implements these filing requirements in the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) under 18 CFR part 154, Sec. Sec.  154.4,
154.7, 154.101, 154.307, 154.201, 154.207-154.209 and 154.401-154.403.
    Action: The Commission is requesting a three-year extension of the
current expiration date, with no changes to the existing collection of
data.
    Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this collection is
estimated as:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Number of      Average burden     Total annual
            Number of respondents annually  (1)               responses per       hours per       burden hours
                                                             respondent  (2)    response  (3)      (1)x(2)x(3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
95........................................................               3.5                40            13,300
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated cost burden to respondents is $780,972. (13,300 hours/
2080 hours per year times $122,137 per year average per employee =
$780,972). The cost per respondent is $8,221. There is a significant
increase in the number of respondents and number of filings per
respondent since the last renewal request because in the last two years
each pipeline has had to file for a change in annual charges whereas
previously they did not. However, the annual charge filings are shorter
than most other tracking filings which has resulted in a reduction in
the burden hours per response.
    The reporting burden includes the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended to generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or provide
the information including: (1) Reviewing instructions; (2) developing,
acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems for the
purposes of collecting, validating, verifying, processing, maintaining,
disclosing and providing information; (3) adjusting the existing ways
to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements;
(4) training personnel to respond to a collection of information; (5)
searching data sources; (6) completing and reviewing the collection of
information; and (7) transmitting, or otherwise disclosing the
information.
    The estimate of cost for respondents is based upon salaries for
professional and clerical support, as well as direct and indirect
overhead costs. Direct costs include all costs directly attributable to
providing this information, such as administrative costs and the cost
for information technology. Indirect or overhead costs are costs
incurred by an organization in support of its mission. These costs
apply to activities which benefit the whole organization rather than
any one particular function or activity.
    Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology e.g. permitting electronic submission of
responses.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-10543 Filed 5-31-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34872-34873]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12357]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0566; FRL-9868-01-OAR]

Notice of June 2022 Alternative Compliance Demonstration Approach
for Certain Small Refineries Under the Renewable Fuel Standard Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is providing notice
of its action to provide an alternative compliance demonstration
approach (the ``June 2022 Compliance Action'') to certain small
refineries whose 2016, 2017, and/or 2018 petitions for small refinery
exemptions (SREs) under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program were
denied in April and June 2022 after being judicially remanded to EPA
for reconsideration. EPA is providing this notice for public awareness
of, and the basis for, the June 2022 Compliance Action announced on
June 3, 2022, which supplements the April 2022 Compliance action
announced on April 7, 2022.

DATES: June 8, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Nelson, Office of Transportation
and Air Quality, Compliance Division, Environmental Protection Agency,
2000 Traverwood Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48105; telephone number: 734-214-
4657; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Clean Air Act (CAA) provides that a small refinery \1\ may at
any time petition EPA for an extension of the exemption from the
obligations of the RFS program for the reason of disproportionate
economic hardship (DEH).\2\ In evaluating such petitions, the EPA
Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy, will
consider the findings of a Department of Energy (DOE) study and other
economic

factors.\3\ In separate actions announced on April 7, 2022, and June 3,
2022, EPA denied 36 and 69 small refinery exemption (SRE) petitions,
respectively, for the 2016-2021 compliance years by finding the
petitioning small refineries did not face DEH caused by compliance with
the RFS program.\4\ Forty-one of those 105 SRE petitions were for the
2016, 2017, or 2018 compliance years, and 34 of those 41 SRE petitions
had previously been granted, and those decisions were reversed on
remand. It is the 2016, 2017, and 2018 RFS renewable volume obligations
(RVOs or ``RFS obligations'') created by the denial of these 34 SRE
petitions that are the subject of the June 2022 Compliance Action.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The CAA defines a small refinery as ``a refinery for which
the average aggregate daily crude oil throughput for a calendar year
. . . does not exceed 75,000 barrels.'' CAA section 211(o)(1)(K).
    \2\ CAA section 211(o)(9)(B)(i).
    \3\ CAA section 211(o)(9)(B)(ii).
    \4\ ``April 2022 Denial of Petitions for RFS Small Refinery
Exemptions,'' EPA-420-R-22-005, April 2022; ``June 2022 Denial of
Petitions for RFS Small Refinery Exemptions,'' EPA-420-R-22-011,
June 2022 (hereinafter the ``SRE Denials'').
    \5\ ``June 2022 Alternative RFS Compliance Demonstration
Approach for Certain Small Refineries,'' EPA-420-R-22-012, June
2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Compliance Action

    Concurrent with issuing the April 2022 SRE Denial on April 7, 2022,
EPA announced \6\ the availability of the April 2022 Compliance
Action,\7\ which provided an alternative compliance demonstration
approach for the 31 small refineries whose SRE petitions had been
previously granted for the 2018 compliance year and were denied upon
remand and reconsideration.\8\ With this notice, EPA is announcing the
availability of the June 2022 Compliance Action, which supplements the
April 2022 Compliance Action to include three additional SRE petitions
for the 2016 or 2017 compliance year that had not yet been decided at
that time.\9\ EPA is providing 31 specific small refineries with an
alternative approach to demonstrating compliance with their 2016, 2017,
and/or 2018 RVOs created by the SRE Denials. Each of the 31 specified
small refineries had previously been granted an SRE for the 2016, 2017,
and/or 2018 compliance year; however, each of their petitions again
came before EPA as the result of judicial remands. As established in
the June 2022 Compliance Action, EPA has determined there are
extenuating circumstances that warrant an alternative compliance
demonstration approach that the specified small refineries may use to
meet their 2016, 2017, and/or 2018 RFS obligations without retiring any
additional RINs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 87 FR 24294 (April 25, 2022).
    \7\ ``April 2022 Alternative RFS Compliance Demonstration
Approach for Certain Small Refineries,'' EPA-420-R-22-006, April
2022.
    \8\ Sinclair Wyoming Refining Co. v. EPA, No. 19-1196 (D.C.
Cir.), Dec. 8, 2021 Order, Doc. No. 1925942.
    \9\ The June 2022 Compliance Action covers a total of 34 SRE
petitions; however, the three additional SRE petitions were all
submitted by small refineries that were previously covered in the
April 2022 Compliance Action. Thus, the June 2022 Compliance Action
still applies to 31 small refineries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Judicial Review

    Section 307(b)(1) of the CAA governs judicial review of final
actions by the EPA. This section provides, in part, that petitions for
review must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit: (i) when the agency action consists of
``nationally applicable . . . final actions taken by the
Administrator,'' or (ii) when such action is locally or regionally
applicable, but ``such action is based on a determination of nationwide
scope or effect and if in taking such action the Administrator finds
and publishes that such action is based on such a determination.'' For
locally or regionally applicable final actions, the CAA reserves to the
EPA complete discretion whether to invoke the exception in (ii)
described in the preceding sentence.
    This final action is ``nationally applicable'' within the meaning
of CAA section 307(b)(1). In the alternative, to the extent a court
finds this final action to be locally or regionally applicable, the
Administrator is exercising the complete discretion afforded to him
under the CAA to make and publish a finding that this action is based
on a determination of ``nationwide scope or effect'' within the meaning
of CAA section 307(b)(1).\10\ This final action provides an alternative
approach to demonstrating compliance with the 2016, 2017, and/or 2018
RFS obligations for 31 small refineries across the country and applies
to small refineries located within 16 states in 7 of the 10 EPA regions
and in 7 different Federal judicial circuits.\11\ This final action is
based on the extenuating circumstances applicable to these 31 small
refineries and the impacts their compliance with their newly created
2016, 2017, and/or 2018 RFS obligations under the existing compliance
scheme would have on the RFS program. For these reasons, this final
action is nationally applicable or, alternatively, the Administrator is
exercising the complete discretion afforded to him by the CAA and
hereby finds that this final action is based on a determination of
nationwide scope or effect for purposes of CAA section 307(b)(1) and is
hereby publishing that finding in the Federal Register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ In deciding whether to invoke the exception by making and
publishing a finding that this final action is based on a
determination of nationwide scope or effect, the Administrator has
also taken into account a number of policy considerations, including
his judgment balancing the benefit of obtaining the D.C. Circuit's
authoritative centralized review versus allowing development of the
issue in other contexts and the best use of Agency resources.
    \11\ In the report on the 1977 Amendments that revised section
307(b)(1) of the CAA, Congress noted that the Administrator's
determination that the ``nationwide scope or effect'' exception
applies would be appropriate for any action that has a scope or
effect beyond a single judicial circuit. See H.R. Rep. No. 95-294 at
323, 324, reprinted in 1977 U.S.C.C.A.N. 1402-03.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit by August 8, 2022.

Joseph Goffman,
Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2022-12357 Filed 6-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48481-48482]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20760]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-84204; File No. SR-MRX-2018-29]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Conform By-Law's
CRO Provisions To Those of an Affiliate Exchange

September 19, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 6, 2018, Nasdaq MRX, LLC (``MRX'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to conform the Exchange's By-Law provisions
regarding the Chief Regulatory Officer to those of its affiliate,
Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx'').
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at http://nasdaqmrx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal office
of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its By-Laws at Article IV, Section 7
to conform its provisions regarding the Exchange's Chief Regulatory
Officer (``CRO'') to those of its affiliate, Nasdaq PHLX LLC
(``Phlx'').\3\ By-Law Article IV, Section 7 presently requires that an
officer of the Exchange \4\ with the position of Executive Vice
President or Senior Vice President be designated as the CRO of the
Exchange. The Exchange now proposes to remove the requirement that the
CRO be an Executive Vice President or Senior Vice President of the
Exchange. The Exchange believes that this requirement is unnecessary
and notes that there may be officers of the Exchange who are well
qualified to serve in the CRO role, but who may not hold the position
of an Executive Vice President or Senior Vice President.\5\ The
Exchange does not seek to amend any of the current responsibilities of
the CRO as set forth in Section 7; \6\ rather, the proposed changes are
intended to give the Exchange more flexibility to attract and retain
well qualified officers to the role of CRO that are not designated as
an Executive Vice President or Senior Vice President of the Exchange.
As noted above, the Exchange desires to conform the requirements to
become CRO in its By-Laws to those in the By-Laws of Phlx, which do not
contain a similar restriction in Article IV, Section 4-7 of its By-Laws
that its CRO be an Executive Vice President or Senior Vice President of
Phlx.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Phlx By-Law Article IV, Section 4-7 (Chief Regulatory
Officer).
    \4\ In Exhibit 5, the references to ``Company'' mean the
Exchange.
    \5\ The Exchange notes that Phlx's CRO currently holds the
position of Vice President.
    \6\ The CRO's responsibilities include general supervision of
the regulatory operations of the Exchange, including responsibility
for overseeing the Exchange's surveillance, examination, and
enforcement functions and for administering any regulatory services
agreements with another SRO to which the Exchange is a party. In
addition, the CRO shall meet with the Regulatory Oversight Committee
of the Exchange in executive session at regularly scheduled meetings
of such committee, and at any time upon request of the CRO or any
member of the Regulatory Oversight Committee. Unlike Phlx, the
Exchange's By-Laws provide that the CRO may also serve as the
General Counsel of the Exchange. See By-Law Article IV, Section 7.
    \7\ See note 5 above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\8\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(1) of the Act,\9\ in particular, in that it enables the Exchange
to be so organized so as to have the capacity to be able to carry out
the purposes of the Act and to comply, and to enforce compliance by its
members and persons associated with its members, with the provisions of
the Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the rules of the
Exchange. The Exchange also believes that this proposal furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ in particular, in that it
is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest. The proposed changes will remove the
requirement currently in Article IV, Section 7 of the Exchange's By-
Laws that the CRO be an Executive Vice President or Senior Vice
President of the Exchange. As discussed above, the current
responsibilities of the CRO as provided in Article IV, Section 7 remain
unchanged under this proposal, and the CRO will continue to have
general oversight of the regulatory operations of the Exchange and be
obligated to meet regularly with the Regulatory Oversight Committee.
The proposed rule change is intended to provide the Exchange with
greater flexibility to attract and retain capable individuals who are
well qualified to serve in the CRO role. In addition, the proposed
amendments will have the additional benefit of bringing the Exchange's
requirements on the CRO role into greater conformity with those of its
affiliate, Phlx, thereby

creating equivalent standards among the affiliated exchanges owned by
Nasdaq, Inc. (``HoldCo'').\11\ As such, the Exchange believes that its
proposal will bring greater consistency to its rules, which is
beneficial to both investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \11\ The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``NSM''), Nasdaq BX, Inc.
(``BX''), Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE''), and Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (``GEMX'')
will file similar proposals to conform their By-Laws with Phlx's By-
Laws. ISE, GEMX, MRX, NSM, BX, and Phlx will hereinafter be referred
to collectively as ``Affiliated Exchanges.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change does
not address competitive issues but relates to the administration and
functioning of the Exchange by allowing the Exchange greater
flexibility in attracting and retaining well qualified officers to the
role of CRO that are not designated as an Executive Vice President or
Senior Vice President.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \12\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \14\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \15\ permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed
rule change may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange
notes that waiver of the operative delay will allow it to amend its By-
Laws by September 26, 2018. The Exchange states that the boards of the
Affiliated Exchanges will collectively meet on that date to address,
among other matters, certain annual corporate ``housekeeping items,''
which the Exchange states has historically included Exchange officer
appointments. As such, the Commission believes that waiver of the
operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby waives the 30-day
operative delay and designates the proposed rule change as operative
upon filing.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \16\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-MRX-2018-29 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MRX-2018-29. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received
will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-MRX-2018-29 and should be submitted on
or before October 16, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-20760 Filed 9-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42340]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18940]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC17-167-000.
    Applicants: Shoreham Solar Commons LLC, Duke Energy Renewables
Solar, LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act and Request for Waivers and Expedited Action of
Shoreham Solar Commons LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 8/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170830-5159.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/20/17.

    Docket Numbers: EC17-168-000.
    Applicants: Florida Power & Light Company.
    Description: Application for Approval of Acquisition of
Transmission Assets Pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power Act
and Request for Expedited Action of Florida Power & Light Company.
    Filed Date: 8/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170830-5161.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/20/17.

    Docket Numbers: EC17-169-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Indiana, LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization Under Section 203 for
Duke Energy Indiana, LLC.
    Filed Date: 8/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170830-5163.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/20/17.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2950-011.
    Applicants: Spruance Genco, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status by Spruance
Genco, LLC.
    Filed Date: 8/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170829-5135.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/19/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1756-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., Ameren
Illinois Company.
    Description: Ameren Services Company, on behalf of Ameren Illinois
Company submits tariff filing per 35.19a(b): Refund Report to be
effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 8/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170830-5174.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/20/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2385-000.
    Applicants: Great Valley Solar 3, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Great Valley Solar 3, LLC
Petition for Order Accepting Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective
10/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 8/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170830-5143.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/20/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2386-000.
    Applicants: Great Bay Solar I, LLC.
    Description: Initial rate filing: Reactive Service to be effective
11/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 8/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170830-5148.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/20/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2387-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Sec. 205(d) Rate Filing: 2017-08-31 Transferred
Frequency Response Agreement Bonneville Power Admin. to be effective
11/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 8/31/17.
    Accession Number: 20170831-5000.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2388-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc., Southwestern Public Service
Company.
    Description: Joint Request for Limited Tariff Waiver of
Southwestern Public Service Company, et al.
    Filed Date: 8/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170830-5157.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/20/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2389-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Notice of Cancellation of Service Agreement No. 636 of
Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Filed Date: 8/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170830-5158.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/20/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2390-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of WMPA
No. 4749; Queue No. AC1-037 to be effective 10/30/2017.
    Filed Date: 8/31/17.
    Accession Number: 20170831-5034.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/21/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 31, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-18940 Filed 9-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P