Exhibit 1: Respondent Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical ClericalConsultant Respon. Labor Capital/ # of Total Capital/ Total $ 101.68/ $ 77.35/ $ 59.51/ $ 28.65/ $ 77.35/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M RespondentsHours per Startup O& M Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Cost Cost Year WHO IS SUBJECT TO THESE REGULATIONS Read 40 CFR Part 63, Subparts A and EEE 1.00 4.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 $ 768 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 429.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 29,958 Subtotal 1.00 4.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 $ 768 $ 0 $ 0 429.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 29,958 STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE BURNING INCINERATORS, LWAKS, AND CEMENT KILNS Cement kilns with in line kiln raw mills ( 63.1204( d))

Conduct performance testing when the raw mills is on line and when the mill is off line 0.00 3.00 30.00 10.00 40.00 83.00 $ 5,398 $ 0 $ 5,000 1.0 83.0 $ 0 $ 5,000 $ 10,398 Prepare and submit notification of compliance using the emission averaging requirements for cement kilns with in line raw mills 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 5.00 $ 285 $ 0 $ 8 1.0 5.0 $ 0 $ 8 $ 293 Document in operating record compliance with the emission averaging requirements for cement kilns with in line raw mills 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.00 1.00 $ 44 $ 0 $ 0 1.0 1.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 44 Subtotal 0.00 4.00 33.50 11.50 40.00 89.00 $ 5,727 $ 0 $ 5,008 89.0 $ 0 $ 5,008 $ 10,735 Preheater or preheater/ precalciner kilns with dual stacks ( 63.1204( e))

Conduct performance testing on each stack 0.00 0.00 8.00 5.00 40.00 53.00 $ 3,713 $ 0 $ 5,000 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Prepare and submit a notification of compliance using the emission averaging requirements for preheater or preheater/ precalciner kilns with dual stacks 0.00 1.00 8.00 2.00 0.00 11.00 $ 611 $ 0 $ 8 0.0 3.7 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Document in the operating record compliance with the emission averaging requirements for preheater or preheater/ precalciner kilns with dual stacks 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.00 1.00 $ 44 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 1.00 16.50 7.50 40.00 65.00 $ 4,368 $ 0 $ 5,008 3.7 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Page 1 of 13 Exhibit 1: Respondent Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical ClericalConsultant Respon. Labor Capital/ # of Total Capital/ Total $ 101.68/ $ 77.35/ $ 59.51/ $ 28.65/ $ 77.35/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M RespondentsHours per Startup O& M Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Cost Cost Year COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS Compliance with alternative MACT standards ( 63.1206( b)( 1)( ii))

Document in the operating record compliance with such applicable CAA requirements in lieu of the requirements of Subpart EEE 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 $ 60 $ 0 $ 0 2.0 2.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 119 Subtotal 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 $ 60 $ 0 $ 0 2.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 119 Extension of compliance with emission standards ( 63.1206( b)( 4), 63.6( i), 63.1213, and 63.9( c))

Prepare and submit the request for an extension of compliance 0.00 2.00 24.00 4.00 0.00 30.00 $ 1,698 $ 0 $ 8 8.0 240.0 $ 0 $ 64 $ 13,644 Prepare and submit a progress report, as applicable 0.00 1.00 12.00 2.00 0.00 15.00 $ 849 $ 0 $ 8 4.0 60.0 $ 0 $ 32 $ 3,427 Subtotal 0.00 3.00 36.00 6.00 0.00 45.00 $ 2,546 $ 0 $ 16 300.0 $ 0 $ 96 $ 17,071 Changes in design, operation, or maintenance ( 63.1206( b)( 5))

Prepare and submit a notification of change in design,

operation, or maintenance 0.00 2.00 32.00 8.00 40.00 82.00 $ 5,382 $ 0 $ 8 20.0 1,640.0 $ 0 $ 160 $ 107,806 Conduct a comprehensive performance test 0.00 20.00 80.00 28.00 350.00 478.00 $ 34,183 $ 0 $ 50,000 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Document change in operating record if it is determined that the change will not adversely affect compliance with emission standards or operating requirements 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 $ 60 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revise, as necessary, the performance test plan,

Documentation of Compliance, and start up, shutdown, and malfunction plan to reflect changes that will not adversely affect compliance with emission standards or operating requirements. 0.00 1.00 6.00 4.00 0.00 11.00 $ 549 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 23.00 119.00 40.00 390.00 572.00 $ 40,174 $ 0 $ 50,008 1,640.0 $ 0 $ 160 $ 107,806 Use of previous test results to document compliance with MACT DRE standard Document quality of previous DRE test data 0.00 4.00 30.00 4.00 16.00 54.00 $ 3,447 $ 0 $ 8 39.0 2,106.0 $ 0 $ 312 $ 134,743 Subtotal 0.00 4.00 30.00 4.00 16.00 54.00 $ 3,447 $ 0 $ 8 2,106.0 $ 0 $ 312 $ 134,743 Applicability of particulate matter and opacity standards during particulate matter CEMS correlation tests ( 63.1206( b)( 8))

Prepare and submit a particulate matter CEMS correlation test plan 0.00 2.00 16.00 2.00 0.00 20.00 $ 1,164 $ 0 $ 8 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Request additional time extension for waiving PM and Opacity s 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.10 $ 6 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 2.00 16.00 2.00 0.00 20.00 $ 1,164 $ 0 $ 8 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Alternative standards for hazardous waste burning lightweight aggregate kilns using MACT ( 63.1206( b)( 9))

Prepare and submit a petition for alternative emission standards 0.00 4.00 30.00 4.00 16.00 54.00 $ 3,447 $ 0 $ 8 0.3 16.2 $ 0 $ 2 $ 1,036 Subtotal 0.00 4.00 30.00 4.00 16.00 54.00 $ 3,447 $ 0 $ 8 16.2 $ 0 $ 2 $ 1,036 Alternative standards for hazardous waste burning cement kilns ( 63.1206( b)( 10))

Prepare and submit a petition for alternative emission standards 0.00 4.00 30.00 4.00 16.00 54.00 $ 3,447 $ 0 $ 8 1.0 54.0 $ 0 $ 8 $ 3,455 Subtotal 0.00 4.00 30.00 4.00 16.00 54.00 $ 3,447 $ 0 $ 8 54.0 $ 0 $ 8 $ 3,455 Hazardous waste residence time Document hazardous waste residence time in operating record 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 2.50 $ 151 $ 0 $ 8 39.0 97.5 $ 0 $ 312 $ 6,208 Subtotal 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 2.50 $ 151 $ 0 $ 8 97.5 $ 0 $ 312 $ 6,208 Alternative hydrocarbon monitoring location for short cement kilns burning haz waste at location other than hot end of kiln Page 2 of 13 Exhibit 1: Respondent Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical ClericalConsultant Respon. Labor Capital/ # of Total Capital/ Total $ 101.68/ $ 77.35/ $ 59.51/ $ 28.65/ $ 77.35/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M RespondentsHours per Startup O& M Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Cost Cost Year Prepare and submit a petition for alternative monitoring location and emission standards 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.50 16.00 19.50 $ 1,448 $ 0 $ 8 0.3 5.9 $ 0 $ 2 $ 437 Subtotal 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.50 16.00 19.50 $ 1,448 $ 0 $ 8 5.9 $ 0 $ 2 $ 437 Alternative particulate matter standard of incinerators with feeds with low levels of metals ( 63.1206( b)( 14))

Prepare and submit a petition for an alternative particulate matter standardfor incinerators with de minimus metals 0.00 1.00 15.00 2.00 15.00 33.00 $ 2,188 $ 0 $ 0 9.0 297.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 19,688 Subtotal 0.00 1.00 15.00 2.00 15.00 33.00 $ 2,188 $ 0 $ 0 297.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 19,688 Startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan ( 63.1206( c)( 2) and 63.6( e)( 3))

Develop a startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan 0.00 6.00 40.00 8.00 32.00 86.00 $ 5,549 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 3,354.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 216,411 Have it reviewed and approved by EPA 0.00 1.00 5.00 2.00 5.00 13.00 $ 819 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 507.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 31,940 Make the plan available for inspection, if requested by the EPA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.50 $ 14 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 19.5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 559 Keep the plan on record for the life of the affected source or until the affected source is no longer subject to the provisions of 40 CFR Part 63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.50 $ 14 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 19.5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 559 Keep previous versions of the plan on record for a period of 5 years after each revision, if the plan is revised 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.50 $ 14 $ 67 $ 0 39.0 19.5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,159 Excessive emissions reporting 1.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 9.00 $ 600 $ 0 $ 1 20.0 180.0 $ 2,600 $ 20 $ 12,028 Subtotal 0.00 7.00 45.00 11.50 37.00 100.50 $ 6,411 $ 67 $ 0 4,099.5 2,600.1 20.0 $ 264,655 Automatic waste feed cutoff ( 63.1206( c)( 3))

Investigate the cause of any AWFCO, take appropriate corrective measures to minimized future AWFCOs, and record the findings and correctvies measures in the operating record 0.00 2.00 16.00 0.50 0.00 18.50 $ 1,121 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 721.5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 43,726 Develop and submit a written report documenting excessive exceedances and result of the investigation and corrective measures taken 0.00 2.00 16.00 0.50 0.00 18.50 $ 1,121 $ 0 $ 8 4.0 74.0 $ 0 $ 32 $ 4,517 Test the AWFCO system and associated alarms weekely and document and record AWFCO operability test procedures and result in the operating record 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 1.50 $ 89 $ 0 $ 0 20.0 30.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,785 Document in the operating record that weekly inspections will unduly restrict or upset operations 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 $ 30 $ 0 $ 0 20.0 10.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 595 Test the AWFCO system monthly, and record results in operating record 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 1.50 $ 89 $ 0 $ 0 20.0 30.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,785 Document in the operating record the operating and maintenance plan ramp down procedures, as applicable 0.00 0.50 6.00 1.00 0.00 7.50 $ 424 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 292.5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,551 Subtotal 0.00 4.50 41.50 2.00 0.00 48.00 $ 2,875 $ 0 $ 8 1,158.0 $ 0 $ 32 $ 68,960 ESV openings ( 63.1206( c)( 4))

Develop an ESV operating plan and keep it in the operating record 0.00 2.00 20.00 1.00 0.00 23.00 $ 1,374 $ 0 $ 0 15.0 345.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 20,603 Investigate the cause of the ESV opening, take appropriate corrective measures to minimize such future ESV openings,

record the findings and corrective measures in the operating record, and determine if ESV caused non compliance 0.00 2.00 16.00 0.50 0.00 18.50 $ 1,121 $ 0 $ 0 90.0 1,665.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 100,907 Page 3 of 13 Exhibit 1: Respondent Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical ClericalConsultant Respon. Labor Capital/ # of Total Capital/ Total $ 101.68/ $ 77.35/ $ 59.51/ $ 28.65/ $ 77.35/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M RespondentsHours per Startup O& M Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Cost Cost Year Develop and submit a written report documenting the ESV opening and result of the investigation and corrective measures taken, and whether ESV event caused non complianc 0.00 2.00 16.00 0.50 0.00 18.50 $ 1,121 $ 0 $ 8 90.0 1,665.0 $ 0 $ 720 $ 101,627 Subtotal 0.00 6.00 52.00 2.00 0.00 60.00 $ 3,616 $ 0 $ 8 3,675.0 $ 0 $ 720 $ 223,138 Combustion system leaks ( 63.1206( c)( 5))

Prepare and submit a request to use an alternative means of control to provide control of combustion system leaks 0.00 0.50 10.00 0.50 0.00 11.00 $ 648 $ 0 $ 8 20.0 220.0 $ 0 $ 160 $ 13,122 Specify in the comprehensive test workplan and the notification of compliance the methods used to control combustion system l 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.25 $ 15 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 9.8 $ 0 $ 0 $ 580 Subtotal 0.00 0.50 10.25 0.50 0.00 11.25 $ 663 $ 0 $ 8 229.8 $ 0 $ 160 $ 13,702 Operator training and certification ( 63.1206( c)( 6))

Develop an operator training and certification program,

implement the program, record the plan in the operating record,

and keep records of the certification and training activities 0.00 8.00 200.00 5.00 10.00 223.00 $ 13,438 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 8,697.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 524,066 Subtotal 0.00 8.00 200.00 5.00 10.00 223.00 $ 13,438 $ 0 $ 0 8,697.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 524,066 Operation and maintenance plan Prepare an operation and maintenance plan and put in the operating record 0.00 5.00 120.00 10.00 40.00 175.00 $ 10,909 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 6,825.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 425,434 Install and operating bag leak detectors for LWAKs and inc with 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 $ 1,190 $ 500 $ 500 10.0 200.0 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 21,902 Subtotal 0.00 5.00 140.00 10.00 40.00 195.00 $ 12,099 $ 500 $ 500 7,025.0 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 447,336 Total ( Compliance and Standards) 1,657.75 $ 108,036 $ 567 $ 60,612 29,924.5 $ 7,600 $ 11,833 $ 1,873,114 Page 4 of 13 Exhibit 1: Respondent Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical ClericalConsultant Respon. Labor Capital/ # of Total Capital/ Total $ 101.68/ $ 77.35/ $ 59.51/ $ 28.65/ $ 77.35/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M RespondentsHours per Startup O& M Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Cost Cost Year PERFORMANCE TESTING REQUIREMENTS Comprehensive performance test requirements ( 63.1207( b)( 1))

Perform comprehensive performance test no later than 61 months after the date of commencing the previous comprehensive performance test 0.00 20.00 140.00 50.00 500.00 710.00 $ 49,987 $ 0 $ 60,000 53.7 38,103.3 $ 0 $ 3,220,000 $ 5,902,641 Request 60 day extention to complete testing 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 $ 166 $ 0 $ 8 10.0 30.0 $ 0 $ 80 $ 1,735 Request additional time for waiving OPLs for pretesting 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 $ 166 $ 0 $ 8 5.0 15.0 $ 0 $ 40 $ 868 Subtotal 0.00 22.00 142.00 52.00 500.00 716.00 $ 50,318 $ 0 $ 60,016 38,148.3 $ 0 $ 3,220,120 $ 5,905,244 Confirmatory performance test requirements ( 63.1207( b)( 2))

Perform the confirmatory performance test no later than 31 months after the date of commencing the previous comprehensive performance test 0.00 10.00 20.00 8.00 100.00 138.00 $ 9,928 $ 0 $ 10,000 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 10.00 20.00 8.00 100.00 138.00 $ 9,928 $ 0 $ 10,000 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Data in lieu of the initial comprehensive performance test ( 63.1207( c)( 2))

Prepare and submit a request that previous emissions test data serve as documentation of conformance with emission standards 0.00 1.00 8.00 2.00 0.00 11.00 $ 611 $ 0 $ 8 4.0 44.0 $ 0 $ 32 $ 2,475 Subtotal 0.00 1.00 8.00 2.00 0.00 11.00 $ 611 $ 0 $ 8 44.0 $ 0 $ 32 $ 2,475 Notification of performance test and CMS perfomance evaluation and approval of test plan CMS performance evaluation plan Prepare and submit a notification of intention to conduct a perfomance test 0.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 6.00 $ 344 $ 0 $ 1 39.0 234.0 $ 0 $ 39 $ 13,457 Prepare and submit the rescheduled notification of intent to conduct a performance test, if test is postponed 0.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 6.00 $ 344 $ 0 $ 1 1.0 6.0 $ 0 $ 1 $ 345 Prepare and submit a site specific comprehensive performance test plan 0.00 2.00 20.00 12.00 80.00 114.00 $ 7,877 $ 0 $ 8 53.7 6,118.0 $ 0 $ 429 $ 423,156 Prepare and submit the site specific confirmatory performance test plan 0.00 2.00 16.00 10.00 40.00 68.00 $ 4,487 $ 0 $ 8 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Prepare and submit additional relevant information, if requested by the EPA 0.00 2.00 20.00 1.00 0.00 23.00 $ 1,374 $ 0 $ 8 19.0 437.0 $ 0 $ 152 $ 26,250 Subtotal 0.00 8.00 64.00 25.00 120.00 217.00 $ 14,426 $ 0 $ 26 6,795.0 $ 0 $ 621 $ 463,207 Notification of compliance ( 63.1207( j), 63.9( h), 63.7( g), 63.10( d)( 2) and 63.1210( d))

Prepare and submit a notification of compliance 0.00 10.00 42.00 16.00 62.00 130.00 $ 8,527 $ 0 $ 8 39.0 5,070.0 $ 0 $ 312 $ 332,873 Prepare and submit a written request for a time extension, if necessary 0.00 0.50 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.50 $ 67 $ 0 $ 8 8.0 12.0 $ 0 $ 64 $ 603 Subtotal 0.00 10.50 42.00 17.00 62.00 131.50 $ 8,595 $ 0 $ 16 5,082.0 $ 0 $ 376 $ 333,475 Waiver of performance tests and request for time extension ( 63.1207( h) and 63.1207( m))

Prepare and submit a request for a 6 month time extension for conducting a performance test if test plan has not been approve 0.00 2.00 24.00 2.00 0.00 28.00 $ 1,640 $ 0 $ 8 8.0 224.0 $ 0 $ 64 $ 13,186 Notify public of request for time extension 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 6.00 $ 404 $ 0 $ 0 8.0 48.0 $ 0 $ 0 Prepare and submit any supplementary information requested by the EPA 0.00 2.00 20.00 1.00 0.00 23.00 $ 1,374 $ 0 $ 8 8.0 184.0 $ 0 $ 64 $ 11,052 Subtotal 1.00 6.00 46.00 4.00 0.00 57.00 $ 3,418 $ 0 $ 16 224.0 $ 0 $ 64 $ 13,186 Total ( Performance Testing) 1,270.50 $ 87,295 $ 0 $ 70,082 50,293.3 $ 0 $ 3,221,213 $ 6,717,587 Page 5 of 13 Exhibit 1: Respondent Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical ClericalConsultant Respon. Labor Capital/ # of Total Capital/ Total $ 101.68/ $ 77.35/ $ 59.51/ $ 28.65/ $ 77.35/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M RespondentsHours per Startup O& M Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Cost Cost Year Page 6 of 13 Exhibit 1: Respondent Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical ClericalConsultant Respon. Labor Capital/ # of Total Capital/ Total $ 101.68/ $ 77.35/ $ 59.51/ $ 28.65/ $ 77.35/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M RespondentsHours per Startup O& M Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Cost Cost Year MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Continuous emissions monitoring system ( CEMS) and continuous opacity monitoring system ( COMS) ( 63.1209( a))

Install, calibrate, maintain, and continuously operate CEMS for carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and oxygen 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 $ 5,951 $ 0 $ 1,000 53.7 5,366.7 $ 0 $ 53,667 $ 373,037 For existing and new cement kilns, install, calibrate, maintain,

and continuously operate COMS for opacity 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 $ 714 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 0.00 112.00 0.00 0.00 112.00 $ 6,665 $ 0 $ 1,000 5,366.7 $ 0 $ 53,667 $ 373,037 Continuous monitoring systems ( CMS)

Install and operate and maintain CMS 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 $ 5,951 $ 0 $ 1,500 53.7 5,366.7 $ 0 $ 80,500 $ 399,870 Subtotal 0.00 0.00 324.00 0.00 0.00 324.00 $ 19,281 $ 0 $ 3,500 16,100.0 $ 0 $ 187,833 $ 1,145,944 Analysis of feedstream ( 63.1209( c)( 2))

Develop and implement a feedstream analysis plan and put plan in the operating record 0.00 8.00 80.00 2.00 0.00 90.00 $ 5,437 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 3,510.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 212,040 Submit the plan for review and approval, if requested by the EPA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.50 $ 14 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 19.5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 559 Monitor and record feedrates ( 4 feedstreams/ facility) 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 $ 119 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 78.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,642 Perform waste analysis four time annually ( non commercial facilities) 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 $ 60 $ 0 $ 2,000 42.7 42.7 $ 0 $ 85,400 $ 87,941 Perform waste analysis 50 times annually ( commercial facilities) 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 $ 60 $ 0 $ 2,000 14.3 14.3 $ 0 $ 28,600 $ 29,451 Subtotal 0.00 8.00 84.00 2.50 0.00 94.50 $ 5,689 $ 0 $ 4,000 3,664.5 $ 0 $ 114,000 $ 334,632 Alternative compliance monitoring requirements for standards other than those monitored with a CEMS ( 63.1209( g)( 1))

Prepare and submit an application for use of an alternative monitoring method 0.00 8.00 20.00 10.00 80.00 118.00 $ 8,284 $ 0 $ 8 4.0 472.0 $ 0 $ 32 $ 33,167 Prepare and submit an application to waive an operating limit 0.00 4.00 24.00 2.00 0.00 30.00 $ 1,795 $ 0 $ 8 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 12.00 44.00 12.00 80.00 148.00 $ 10,079 $ 0 $ 16 472.0 $ 0 $ 32 $ 33,167 Use of CEMS in lieu of OPLs; or alternative methods in lieu of CEMS ( 63.1209( a)( 5))

Prepare and submit an application for use of an alternative monitoring method 0.00 8.00 20.00 10.00 80.00 118.00 $ 8,284 $ 0 $ 8 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Prepare and submit an application to waive an operating limit 0.00 4.00 24.00 2.00 0.00 30.00 $ 1,795 $ 0 $ 8 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 12.00 44.00 12.00 80.00 148.00 $ 10,079 $ 0 $ 16 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 DRE ( 63.1209( j))

Comply with the operating limits applicable to DRE 0.00 0.00 28.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 $ 1,666 $ 0 $ 100 39.0 1,092.0 $ 0 $ 3,900 $ 68,885 Subtotal 0.00 0.00 28.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 $ 1,666 $ 0 $ 100 1,092.0 $ 0 $ 3,900 $ 68,885 Dioxins and furans ( 63.1209( k))

Comply with the operating parameter limits applicable to dioxin and furans 0.00 0.00 28.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 $ 1,666 $ 0 $ 100 39.0 1,092.0 $ 0 $ 3,900 $ 68,885 Document in the operating record procedures used to ensure carbon bed lifetime is being sufficiently monitored and controlled 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.25 $ 15 $ 0 $ 8 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Document in the operating record that replacement carbon will provide the same level of control as original carbon used during the performance test 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.25 $ 15 $ 0 $ 8 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Page 7 of 13 Exhibit 1: Respondent Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical ClericalConsultant Respon. Labor Capital/ # of Total Capital/ Total $ 101.68/ $ 77.35/ $ 59.51/ $ 28.65/ $ 77.35/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M RespondentsHours per Startup O& M Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Cost Cost Year Document in the operating record that replacement inhibitor will provide the same level of control as the original inhibitor used during the performance test 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.25 $ 15 $ 0 $ 8 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 0.00 28.75 0.00 0.00 28.75 $ 1,711 $ 0 $ 124 1,092.0 $ 0 $ 3,900 $ 68,885 Mercury ( 63.1209( l))

Comply with the operating parameter limits applicable to mercury 0.00 0.00 28.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 $ 1,666 $ 0 $ 1,000 39.0 1,092.0 $ 0 $ 39,000 $ 103,985 Prepare and submit request to extrapolate mercury feedrate limits 0.00 0.50 4.00 1.00 0.00 5.50 $ 305 $ 0 $ 8 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Install, calibrate, maintain, and continuously operate CEMS for compliance monitoring for mercury 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 $ 714 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 0.50 44.00 1.00 0.00 45.50 $ 2,686 $ 0 $ 1,008 1,092.0 $ 0 $ 39,000 $ 103,985 Particulate matter ( 63.1209( m))

Comply with the operating parameter limits applicable to particulate matter 0.00 0.00 28.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 $ 1,666 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 1,092.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 64,985 Subtotal 0.00 0.00 28.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 $ 1,666 $ 0 $ 0 1,092.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 64,985 Semivolatile and low volatile metals ( 63.1209( n))

Comply with the operating parameter limits applicable to semivolatile metals and low volatile metals 0.00 0.00 28.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 $ 1,666 $ 0 $ 1,000 39.0 1,092.0 $ 0 $ 39,000 $ 103,985 Prepare and submit request to extrapolate semivolatile metal and low volatile metal feedrate limits 0.00 0.50 4.00 1.00 0.00 5.50 $ 305 $ 0 $ 8 5.0 27.5 $ 0 $ 40 $ 1,567 Install, calibrate, maintain, and continuously operate CEMS for compliance monitoring for semivolatile metals and low volatile metals 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 $ 714 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 0.50 44.00 1.00 0.00 45.50 $ 2,686 $ 0 $ 1,008 1,119.5 $ 0 $ 39,040 $ 105,552 Total chlorine ( hydrochloride and chlorine gas)

Comply with the operating parameter limits applicable to total chlorine 0.00 0.00 28.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 $ 1,666 $ 0 $ 1,000 39.0 1,092.0 $ 0 $ 39,000 $ 103,985 Document in the operating record that replacement sorbent will provide the same level of control as the original sorbent used during the performance test 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.25 $ 15 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Install, calibrate, maintain, and continuously operate CEMS for compliance monitoring total chlorine 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 $ 714 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 0.00 40.25 0.00 0.00 40.25 $ 2,395 $ 0 $ 1,000 1,092.0 $ 0 $ 39,000 $ 103,985 Operating under different modes of operation ( 63.1207( g) and 63.1209( r))

Document the mode of operation in the operating record, if a source has tested under two or more operating modes 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.25 $ 15 $ 0 $ 0 20.0 5.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 298 Subtotal 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.25 $ 15 $ 0 $ 0 5.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 298 Total ( Monitoring) 1,042.75 $ 64,618 $ 0 $ 11,772 32,187.7 $ 0 $ 480,372 $ 2,403,355 Page 8 of 13 Exhibit 1: Respondent Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical ClericalConsultant Respon. Labor Capital/ # of Total Capital/ Total $ 101.68/ $ 77.35/ $ 59.51/ $ 28.65/ $ 77.35/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M RespondentsHours per Startup O& M Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Cost Cost Year CMS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS Quality control program ( 63.1209( d) and 63.8( d)

Develop and implement a CMS quality program 0.00 10.00 24.00 16.00 40.00 90.00 $ 5,754 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 3,510.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 224,417 Keep the CMS quality control program on record for the life of the affected source or until the affected source is no longer subject to the provisions of 40 CFR Part 63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.50 $ 14 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 19.5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 559 Submit the CMS quality control program for inspection, if requested by the EPA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.50 $ 14 $ 0 $ 8 4.0 2.0 $ 0 $ 32 $ 89 Subtotal 0.00 10.00 24.00 17.00 40.00 91.00 $ 5,783 $ 0 $ 8 3,531.5 $ 0 $ 32 $ 225,065 Notification of performance evaluation ( 63.1209( d) and 63.8( e)( 2))

Prepare and submit a notification of CMS performance evaluation 0.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 6.00 $ 344 $ 0 $ 1 39.0 234.0 $ 0 $ 39 $ 13,457 Subtotal 0.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 6.00 $ 344 $ 0 $ 1 234.0 $ 0 $ 39 $ 13,457 Additional notification requirements for CMS ( 63.9( g)( 2) and ( 3))

Prepare and submit additional notification requirements for source with CMS 0.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 6.00 $ 344 $ 0 $ 1 4.0 24.0 $ 0 $ 4 $ 1,380 Subtotal 0.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 6.00 $ 344 $ 0 $ 1 24.0 $ 0 $ 4 $ 1,380 Submission of site specific peformance evaluation test plan ( 63.1209( d) and 63.8( e)( 3))

Develop and submit a CMS site specific performance evaluation test plan 0.00 10.00 24.00 8.00 20.00 62.00 $ 3,978 $ 0 $ 8 39.0 2,418.0 $ 0 $ 312 $ 155,455 Submit additional relevant information, if requested by the EPA 0.00 2.00 12.00 1.00 0.00 15.00 $ 897 $ 0 $ 8 4.0 60.0 $ 0 $ 32 $ 3,622 Subtotal 0.00 12.00 36.00 9.00 20.00 77.00 $ 4,875 $ 0 $ 16 2,478.0 $ 0 $ 344 $ 159,077 Conduct of performance evaluation and performance evaluation dates ( 63.1209( d) and 63.8( e)( 4))

Conduct a CMS performance evalutaion 0.00 4.00 20.00 4.00 20.00 48.00 $ 3,161 $ 0 $ 0 54.0 2,592.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 170,708 Subtotal 0.00 4.00 20.00 4.00 20.00 48.00 $ 3,161 $ 0 $ 0 2,592.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 170,708 Reporting results of CMS performance evaluations ( 63.10( e)( 2))

Prepare and submit a written report of the results of the CMS performance evaluation 0.00 1.00 12.00 6.00 24.00 43.00 $ 2,820 $ 0 $ 8 39.0 1,677.0 $ 0 $ 312 $ 110,285 Prepare and submit written reports of the results of the COMS perforamce evaluation, as applicable 0.00 1.00 10.00 4.00 8.00 23.00 $ 1,406 $ 0 $ 8 5.0 115.0 $ 0 $ 40 $ 7,069 Subtotal 0.00 2.00 22.00 10.00 32.00 66.00 $ 4,226 $ 0 $ 16 1,792.0 $ 0 $ 352 $ 117,355 Total ( CMS Performance Evaluations) 294.00 $ 18,733 $ 0 $ 42 10,651.5 $ 0 $ 771 $ 687,041 Page 9 of 13 Exhibit 1: Respondent Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical ClericalConsultant Respon. Labor Capital/ # of Total Capital/ Total $ 101.68/ $ 77.35/ $ 59.51/ $ 28.65/ $ 77.35/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M RespondentsHours per Startup O& M Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Cost Cost Year MISCELLANEOUS NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS Initial notification 63.9( b) and 63.5( d)

Prepare and submit and initial notification 0.00 2.00 8.00 1.00 0.00 11.00 $ 659 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 429.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 25,718 Prepare and submit an application of approval of construction as applicable 1.00 6.00 32.00 0.50 0.00 39.50 $ 2,484 $ 0 $ 0 2.0 79.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,969 Prepare and submit an application of approval of reconstruction as applicable 1.00 6.00 32.00 0.50 0.00 39.50 $ 2,484 $ 0 $ 0 2.0 79.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,969 Submit additional relevant information as requested by the EPA 0.00 0.50 4.00 1.00 0.00 5.50 $ 305 $ 0 $ 0 4.0 22.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,221 Subtotal 0.00 14.50 76.00 3.00 0.00 95.50 $ 5,934 $ 0 $ 0 609.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 36,877 Adjustment to time periods or postmark deadlines for submittal and review of required communications 63.9( i)

Prepare and submit a request for an adjustment to a time period or postmark deadline 0.00 0.25 2.00 0.50 0.00 2.75 $ 153 $ 0 $ 8 10.0 27.5 $ 0 $ 80 $ 1,607 Subtotal 0.00 0.25 2.00 0.50 0.00 2.75 $ 153 $ 0 $ 8 27.5 $ 0 $ 80 $ 1,607 Change in information already provided 63.9( i)

Submit change( s) in the information already provided, as necessary 0.00 0.25 2.00 0.50 0.00 2.75 $ 153 $ 0 $ 8 10.0 27.5 $ 0 $ 80 $ 1,607 Subtotal 0.00 0.25 2.00 0.50 0.00 2.75 $ 153 $ 0 $ 8 27.5 $ 0 $ 80 $ 1,607 Request to reduce frequency of excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance results 63.10( e)( 3)( ii)

Prepare and submit a request to reduce the frequency of excess emissions and CMS performance reports 0.00 0.25 2.00 0.50 0.00 2.75 $ 153 $ 0 $ 8 4.0 11.0 $ 0 $ 32 $ 643 Subtotal 0.00 0.25 2.00 0.50 0.00 2.75 $ 153 $ 0 $ 8 11.0 $ 0 $ 32 $ 643 Waiver of recordkeeping and reporting requirements Prepare and submit a waiver of recordkeeping and reporting 0.00 0.25 2.00 0.50 0.00 2.75 $ 153 $ 0 $ 8 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 0.25 2.00 0.50 0.00 2.75 $ 153 $ 0 $ 8 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Data Compression Prepare and submit request for approval to use data compression techniques to record data on a less frequent basis than required by Section 63.1209 0.00 0.25 2.00 0.50 0.00 2.75 $ 153 $ 0 $ 8 10.0 27.5 $ 0 $ 80 $ 1,607 Subtotal 0.00 0.25 2.00 0.50 0.00 2.75 $ 153 $ 0 $ 8 10.0 27.5 $ 0 $ 80 $ 1,607 Total ( Miscellaneous Recordkeeping and Reporting) 109.25 $ 6,697 $ 0 $ 40 702.5 $ 0 $ 272 $ 42,340 Page 10 of 13 Exhibit 1: Respondent Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical ClericalConsultant Respon. Labor Capital/ # of Total Capital/ Total $ 101.68/ $ 77.35/ $ 59.51/ $ 28.65/ $ 77.35/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M RespondentsHours per Startup O& M Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Cost Cost Year MISCELLANEOUS REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Startup, shutdown, and malfunction reports 63.10( d)( 5)( i) and ( ii)

Prepare and submit a periodic startup, shutdown, and malfunction report, as applicable 0.00 0.25 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.25 $ 167 $ 0 $ 8 10.0 32.5 $ 0 $ 80 $ 1,750 Prepare and submit an immediate startup, shutdown, and malfunction report, as applicable 0.00 0.25 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.25 $ 167 $ 0 $ 8 4.0 13.0 $ 0 $ 32 $ 700 Subtotal 0.00 0.50 4.00 2.00 0.00 6.50 $ 334 $ 0 $ 16 45.5 $ 0 $ 112 $ 2,450 Excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary report 63.10( e)( 3)

Prepare and submit an excess emissions and monitoring system performance report and summary report 0.00 0.25 4.00 2.00 0.00 6.25 $ 315 $ 0 $ 8 39.0 243.8 $ 0 $ 312 $ 12,585 Subtotal 0.00 0.25 4.00 2.00 0.00 6.25 $ 315 $ 0 $ 8 243.8 $ 0 $ 312 $ 12,585 MISCELLANEOUS RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS General recordkeeping requirements 63.10( b)

Retain files of all information ( including all reports and)

notifications) for atleast 5 years 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 $ 1,146 $ 67 $ 0 39.0 1,560.0 $ 2,600 $ 0 $ 47,296 Subtotal 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 $ 1,146 $ 67 $ 0 1,560.0 $ 2,600 $ 0 $ 47,296 Additional recordkeeping requirements for source with CMS ( 63.10( c))

Maintain additional records for continuous monitoring systems 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 $ 573 $ 67 $ 0 39.0 780.0 $ 2,600 $ 0 $ 24,948 Subtotal 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 $ 573 $ 67 $ 0 780.0 $ 2,600 $ 0 $ 24,948 Documentation of Compliance 63.1211( d)

Develop a Documentation of Compliance and include it in the operating record 0.00 1.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 7.00 $ 373 $ 67 $ 0 39.0 273.0 $ 2,600 $ 0 $ 17,135 Subtotal 0.00 1.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 7.00 $ 373 $ 67 $ 0 273.0 $ 2,600 $ 0 $ 17,135 Total ( Miscellaneous Recordkeeping and Reporting) 79.75 $ 2,740 $ 200 $ 24 2,902.3 $ 7,800 $ 424 $ 104,414 Page 11 of 13 Exhibit 1: Respondent Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical ClericalConsultant Respon. Labor Capital/ # of Total Capital/ Total $ 101.68/ $ 77.35/ $ 59.51/ $ 28.65/ $ 77.35/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M RespondentsHours per Startup O& M Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Cost Cost Year POLLUTION PREVENTION OR WASTE MINIMIZATION Extension of the compliance date to install pollution prevention or waste minimization controls ( 63.1213)

Prepare and submit the request for an extrension of compliance date due to installation of pollution prevention controls 0.00 4.00 24.00 2.00 0.00 30.00 $ 1,795 $ 0 $ 8 8.0 240.0 $ 0 $ 64 $ 14,424 Prepare and submit the request for an extrension of compliance date due to waste minimization controls 0.00 4.00 24.00 2.00 0.00 30.00 $ 1,795 $ 0 $ 8 8.0 240.0 $ 0 $ 64 $ 14,424 Subtotal 0.00 8.00 48.00 4.00 0.00 60.00 $ 3,590 $ 0 $ 16 480.0 $ 0 $ 128 $ 28,847 Total ( Pollution Prevention) 0.00 8.00 48.00 4.00 0.00 60.00 $ 3,590 $ 0 $ 16 480.0 $ 0 $ 128 $ 28,847 Page 12 of 13 Exhibit 1: Respondent Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical ClericalConsultant Respon. Labor Capital/ # of Total Capital/ Total $ 101.68/ $ 77.35/ $ 59.51/ $ 28.65/ $ 77.35/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M RespondentsHours per Startup O& M Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Cost Cost Year QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES FOR CEMS Quality control ( QC) requirements ( 63, Subpart EEE Appendix, Section 1.1)

Develop and implement a QC program 0.00 8.00 150.00 12.00 40.00 210.00 $ 12,983 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 8,190.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 506,346 Revise program, if necessary 0.00 1.00 8.00 1.00 0.00 10.00 $ 582 $ 0 $ 0 4.0 40.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,328 Record program in operating record 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 $ 1,190 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 780.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 46,418 Subtotal 0.00 9.00 178.00 13.00 40.00 240.00 $ 14,756 $ 0 $ 0 9,010.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 555,092 Quality assurance ( QA) requirements ( 63, Subpart EEE Appendix, Section 1.1)

Develop and implement a QA program 0.00 9.00 150.00 12.00 20.00 191.00 $ 11,514 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 7,449.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 449,028 Revise or update plan, if necessary 0.00 1.00 8.00 1.00 0.00 10.00 $ 582 $ 0 $ 0 4.0 40.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,328 Record plan in the operating record 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 $ 595 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 390.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 23,209 Subtotal 0.00 10.00 168.00 13.00 20.00 211.00 $ 12,691 $ 0 $ 0 7,879.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 474,565 Calibration drift ( CD) and zero drift ( ZD) assessment and daily system audit ( 63, Subpart EEE Appendix, Section 4)

Check, record, and quantify the ZD and the CD at least once daily ( 330 times per year) 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 $ 4,761 $ 0 $ 0 54.0 4,320.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 257,083 Retain all CEMS measurements in the operating record for at least 5 years 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 $ 60 $ 0 $ 0 54.0 54.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,214 Subtotal 0.00 0.00 81.00 0.00 0.00 81.00 $ 4,820 $ 0 $ 0 4,374.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 260,297 Performance Evaluation ( Appendix EEE, Section 5)

Conduct ACA, RATA, or interference reponse test as applicable 0.00 0.00 24.00 0.00 50.00 74.00 $ 5,296 $ 0 $ 5,000 39.0 2,886.0 $ 0 $ 195,000 $ 401,538 Prepare and submit a written report of the results of the performance evaluation 0.00 0.25 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 $ 79 $ 0 $ 8 39.0 48.8 $ 0 $ 312 $ 3,387 Subtotal 0.00 0.25 25.00 0.00 50.00 75.25 $ 5,375 $ 0 $ 5,008 2,934.8 $ 0 $ 195,312 $ 404,925 Use of alternative CEMS spans ( 63, Subpart EEE Appendix, Section 6.3.5)

Prepare and submit a request to use an alternative CEMS span 0.00 0.50 15.00 1.00 10.00 26.50 $ 1,733 $ 0 $ 8 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 0.50 15.00 1.00 10.00 26.50 $ 1,733 $ 0 $ 8 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Total ( QA for CEMS) 633.75 $ 39,375 $ 0 $ 5,016 24,197.8 $ 0 $ 195,312 $ 1,694,879 GRAND TOTAL 5,147.75 $ 331,086 $ 767 $ 147,604 2,557.3 151,339.5 $ 15,401 $ 3,910,325 $ 13,551,577 Page 13 of 13 Exhibit 2: Agency Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical Clerical ConsultantRespondent Labor Capital/ # Of Total Total $ 65.37/ $ 41.49/ $ 29.12/ $ 17.70/ $ 41.49/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M Respondents Hours per Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Year STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE BURNING CEMENT KILNS, INCINERATORS, AND LWAKS Cement kilns with in line raw mills Review notifications to comly with the emission averaging requirements for cement kilns with in line raw mills 0.00 0.50 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 $ 79 $ 0 $ 0 1.0 2.5 $ 79 Notifying applicants of EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 1.0 0.5 $ 16 Subtotal 0.00 0.75 2.00 0.25 0.00 3.00 $ 94 $ 0 $ 1 3.0 $ 95 Preheater of preheater/ precalciner kilns with dual stacks Review notifications to comply with the emission averaging requirements for preheater or preheater/ precalciner kilns with dual stacks 0.00 0.50 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 $ 79 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Notifying applicants of EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 0.75 2.00 0.25 0.00 3.00 $ 94 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 $ 0 COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS Compliance with the standards Review operating record documenting compliance with all applicable CAA requirements and standards when not burning hazardous waste 0.00 0.50 4.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 $ 137 $ 0 $ 0 2.0 9.0 $ 274 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 2.0 1.0 $ 32 Subtotal 0.00 0.75 4.00 0.25 0.00 5.00 $ 152 $ 0 $ 1 10.0 $ 306 Extension of compliance with emission standards Review requests for extension of the compliance date 0.00 0.50 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 $ 79 $ 0 $ 0 8.0 20.0 $ 632 Review progress reports, if required by EPA 0.00 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 $ 50 $ 0 $ 0 4.0 6.0 $ 199 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 5 8.0 4.0 $ 158 Subtotal 0.00 1.25 3.00 0.25 0.00 4.50 $ 144 $ 0 $ 5 30.0 $ 990 Changes in design, operation, or maintenance Review notifications of changes in design, operation, or maintenance 0.00 3.00 24.00 0.00 0.00 27.00 $ 823 $ 0 $ 0 20.0 540.0 $ 16,466 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 20.0 10.0 $ 316 Subtotal 0.00 3.25 24.00 0.25 0.00 27.50 $ 838 $ 0 $ 1 550.0 $ 16,782 Applicability of particulate matter and opacity standards during PM CEMS correlation tests Review of PM CEMS correlation test plans 0.00 0.25 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 $ 69 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Notify applicants of EPA' determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 0.50 2.00 0.25 0.00 2.75 $ 83 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 $ 0 Alternative standards for existing or new hazardous waste burning lightweight aggregate kilns Review requests for approval of alternative emission standards for LWAKs 0.00 1.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 $ 333 $ 0 $ 0 0.3 3.3 $ 100 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 0.3 0.2 $ 5 Subtotal 0.00 1.25 10.00 0.25 0.00 11.50 $ 347 $ 0 $ 1 3.5 $ 105 Alternative standards for existing or new hazardous waste burning cement kilns Review requests for approval of alternative emission Page 1 of 7 Exhibit 2: Agency Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical Clerical ConsultantRespondent Labor Capital/ # Of Total Total $ 65.37/ $ 41.49/ $ 29.12/ $ 17.70/ $ 41.49/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M Respondents Hours per Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Year standards for cement kilns 0.00 1.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 $ 333 $ 0 $ 0 1.0 11.0 $ 333 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 1.0 0.5 $ 16 Subtotal 0.00 1.25 10.00 0.25 0.00 11.50 $ 347 $ 0 $ 1 11.5 $ 348 Alternative particulate matter standard for incinerators with low feedrates of metals Review petitions for alternative particulate matter standard for incinerators with low feedrates of metals 0.00 0.50 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.50 $ 312 9.0 94.5 $ 2,807 Notify applicants of EPA' determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 0 9.0 4.5 $ 133 Subtotal 0.00 0.75 10.00 0.25 0.00 11.00 $ 327 $ 0 $ 0 99.0 $ 2,940 Startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan Review startup, shutdown, and malfunction plans, notify applicant of results of review 0.00 0.50 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 $ 79 $ 0 $ 1 39.0 97.5 $ 3,119 Subtotal 0.00 0.50 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 $ 79 $ 0 $ 1 97.5 $ 3,119 Automatic waste feed cutoff Review excessive exceedance reports 0.00 0.25 5.00 0.10 0.00 5.35 $ 158 $ 0 $ 0 4.0 21.4 $ 631 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 4.0 2.0 $ 63 Subtotal 0.00 0.50 5.00 0.35 0.00 5.85 $ 173 $ 0 $ 1 23.4 $ 694 ESV openings Review ESV openings report 0.00 0.25 5.00 0.10 0.00 5.35 $ 158 $ 0 $ 0 90.0 481.5 $ 14,195 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 90.0 45.0 $ 1,422 Subtotal 0.00 0.50 5.00 0.35 0.00 5.85 $ 173 $ 0 $ 1 526.5 $ 15,617 Combustion system leaks Review requests for approval of alternative means of combustion system leak control 0.00 0.50 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 $ 79 $ 0 $ 0 20.0 50.0 $ 1,580 Notify applicants of EPA' determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 20.0 10.0 $ 316 Subtotal 0.00 0.75 2.00 0.25 0.00 3.00 $ 94 $ 0 $ 1 60.0 $ 1,896 Operator training and certification Review operator training and certification programs 0.00 0.25 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.25 $ 302 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 399.8 $ 11,760 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 20 39.0 19.5 $ 1,357 Subtotal 0.00 0.50 10.00 0.25 0.00 10.75 $ 316 $ 0 $ 20 419.3 $ 13,117 Total ( Compliance and Standards) 107.70 $ 3,260 $ 0 $ 36 1833.6 $ 56,009 PERFORMANCE TESTING REQUIREMENTS Data in lieu of the initial comprehensive performance test Review requests to base initial compliance data in lieu of a comprehensice performance test 0.00 2.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 22.00 $ 665 $ 0 $ 0 4.0 88.0 $ 2,661 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 4.0 2.0 $ 63 Subtotal 0.00 2.25 20.00 0.25 0.00 22.50 $ 680 $ 0 $ 1 90.0 $ 2,724 Notifcation of performance test and CMS performance evaluation and approval of test plan and CMS performance evaluation plan Review notifications of intention to conduct a performance Page 2 of 7 Exhibit 2: Agency Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical Clerical ConsultantRespondent Labor Capital/ # Of Total Total $ 65.37/ $ 41.49/ $ 29.12/ $ 17.70/ $ 41.49/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M Respondents Hours per Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Year test 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.50 $ 18 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 19.5 $ 688 Review notifications of delay in conducting a performance test 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.50 $ 18 $ 0 $ 0 1.0 0.5 $ 18 Review site specific comprehensive performance test plans 0.00 5.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 $ 1,663 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 2145.0 $ 64,869 Review site specific confirmatory performance test plans 0.00 2.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 $ 374 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Request additional relevant information 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 20 19.0 9.5 $ 661 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 20 39.0 19.5 $ 1,357 Subtotal 0.00 8.00 60.50 0.50 0.00 69.00 $ 2,102 $ 0 $ 40 2194.0 $ 67,593 Time extension for subsequent performance tests Review requests for an extension for conducting a performance test ( other than the initial comprehensive performance test) 0.00 4.00 16.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 $ 632 $ 0 $ 0 8.0 160.0 $ 5,055 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 8.0 4.0 $ 126 Subtotal 0.00 4.25 16.00 0.25 0.00 20.50 $ 647 $ 0 $ 1 164.0 $ 5,181 Notification of compliance Review notifications of compliance 0.00 3.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 43.00 $ 1,289 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 1677.0 $ 50,277 Review requests for a time extension for Notification of Compliance 0.00 0.25 4.00 0.00 0.00 4.25 $ 127 $ 0 $ 0 8.0 34.0 $ 1,015 Notify applicants of the EPA' s determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 0 8.0 4.0 $ 118 Subtotal 0.0 3.5 44.0 0.3 0.0 47.8 $ 1,431 $ 0 $ 0 1715.0 $ 51,410 Waiver of performance tests Review requests to waive a performance test 0.00 1.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 $ 158 $ 0 $ 0 13.7 68.5 $ 2,164 Notify applicants of EPA' s determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 0 13.7 6.9 $ 203 Subtotal 0.00 1.25 4.00 0.25 0.00 5.50 $ 173 $ 0 $ 0 75.4 $ 2,367 Total ( Performance Testing) 165.25 $ 5,033 $ 0 $ 42 4238.4 $ 129,276 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Analysis of feedstream Request feedstream analysis plan 0.00 0.75 2.50 0.25 0.00 3.50 $ 108 $ 0 $ 0 20.0 70.0 $ 2,167 Subtotal 0.00 0.75 2.50 0.25 0.00 3.50 $ 108 $ 0 $ 0 20.0 70.0 $ 2,167 Alternative compliance, monitoring requirements for standards other than those monitored with a CEMS Review requests for approval of alternative monitoring methods, except for standards that must be monitored with a CEMS 0.00 0.50 4.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 $ 137 $ 0 $ 0 5.7 25.7 $ 782 Review requests for approval of a waiver of an operating parameter limit 0.00 1.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 $ 158 $ 0 $ 0 1.7 8.5 $ 269 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination for approval of alternative monitoring requirements 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 5.7 2.9 $ 90 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination for approval of a waiver of an operating parameter limit 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 1.7 0.9 $ 27 Page 3 of 7 Exhibit 2: Agency Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical Clerical ConsultantRespondent Labor Capital/ # Of Total Total $ 65.37/ $ 41.49/ $ 29.12/ $ 17.70/ $ 41.49/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M Respondents Hours per Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Year Subtotal 0.00 2.00 8.00 0.50 0.00 10.50 $ 325 $ 0 $ 2 37.9 $ 1,168 DRE Review DRE operating parameter limits 0.00 1.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 $ 158 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 195.0 $ 6,160 Subtotal 0.00 1.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 $ 158 $ 0 $ 0 195.0 $ 6,160 Dioxins and furans Review dioxin and furan operating parameter limits 0.00 1.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 $ 158 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 195.0 $ 6,160 Review requests for approval to substitute a different brand or type of carbon 0.00 0.50 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 $ 79 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Review requesrs for approval to substitute a different brand or type of inhibitor 0.00 0.50 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 $ 79 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination for approval to substitute a different brand or type of carbon 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.75 $ 21 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination for approval to substitute a different brand or type of inhibitor 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.75 $ 21 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 3.00 8.00 0.00 0.50 11.50 $ 357 $ 0 $ 2 195.0 $ 6,160 Mercury Review mercury operating parameter limits 0.00 1.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 $ 158 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 195.0 $ 6,160 Review requests to extrapolate mercury feedrate limits 0.00 0.25 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 $ 69 $ 0 $ 0 5.0 11.3 $ 343 Review requesrs for approval to use a CEMS in lieu of operating parameter limtis 0.00 0.25 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 $ 69 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination to extrapolate mercury feedrate limits 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 5.0 2.5 $ 79 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination for approval to use a CEMS 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 2.00 8.00 0.50 0.00 10.50 $ 325 $ 0 $ 2 208.8 $ 6,583 Particulate matter Review particulate matter operating parameter limits 0.00 1.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 $ 158 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 195.0 $ 6,160 Subtotal 0.00 1.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 $ 158 $ 0 $ 0 195.0 $ 6,160 Semivolatile and low semivolatile metals Review semivolatile metal and low volatile metal operating parameter limit 0.00 1.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 $ 158 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 195.0 $ 6,160 Review requests to extrapolate semivolatile metal and low volatile metal feedrate limits 0.00 0.25 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 $ 69 $ 0 $ 0 5.0 11.3 $ 343 Review requests for approval to use a CEMS in lieu of operating parameter limtis 0.00 0.25 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 $ 69 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination to extrapolate SVM and LVM feedrates 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 5.0 2.5 $ 79 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination for approval to use a CEMS 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 2.00 8.00 0.50 0.00 10.50 $ 325 $ 0 $ 2 208.8 $ 6,583 Page 4 of 7 Exhibit 2: Agency Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical Clerical ConsultantRespondent Labor Capital/ # Of Total Total $ 65.37/ $ 41.49/ $ 29.12/ $ 17.70/ $ 41.49/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M Respondents Hours per Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Year Total chlorine ( hydrochloric acid and chlorine gas)

Review total chlorine operating parameter limits 0.00 1.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 $ 158 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 195.0 $ 6,160 Review requests for approval to substitute a different brand or type of sorbent 0.00 0.25 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 $ 69 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Review requests for approval to use a CEMS in lieu of operating parameter limtis 0.00 0.25 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 $ 69 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination for approval to substitute a different brand or type of sorbent 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination for approval to use a CEMS 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 2.00 8.00 0.50 0.00 10.50 $ 325 $ 0 $ 2 195.0 $ 6,160 Total ( Monitoring) 0.00 13.75 50.50 2.25 0.50 67.00 $ 2,081 $ 0 $ 10 1305.4 $ 41,141 CMS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Quality control program Review CMS quality control program 0.00 0.25 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 $ 39 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 48.8 $ 1,540 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 20 $ 22 39.0 19.5 $ 2,215 Subtotal 0.00 0.50 1.00 0.25 0.00 1.75 $ 54 $ 20 $ 22 68.3 $ 3,755 Notification of performance evaluation Review notifications of CMS performance evaluation 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.10 0.00 0.35 $ 9 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 13.7 $ 353 Subtotal 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.10 0.00 0.35 $ 9 $ 0 $ 0 13.7 $ 353 Additional notification requirements for sources with continuous monitoring systems Review additional notification requirements for source with CMS 0.00 0.25 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 $ 39 $ 0 $ 0 4.0 5.0 $ 158 Subtotal 0.00 0.25 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 $ 39 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 $ 158 Submission of site specific performance evaluation test plan Review site specific performance evaluation test plans 0.00 1.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 $ 158 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 195.0 $ 6,160 Request additional relavant information 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 10 20.0 10.0 $ 496 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 20 39.0 19.5 $ 1,357 Subtotal 0.00 1.50 4.00 0.50 0.00 6.00 $ 188 $ 0 $ 30 224.5 $ 8,014 Reporting results of continuous monitoring system performance evaluations Review written reports of the results of the CMS performance evaluation 0.00 0.50 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 $ 79 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 97.5 $ 3,080 Subtotal 0.00 0.50 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 $ 79 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 $ 3,080 Total ( Performance Evaluation) 0.00 2.75 8.25 0.85 0.00 78.85 $ 369 $ 20 $ 52 306.4 $ 15,360 MISCELLANEOUS NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS Initial notification Review intial notifications 0.00 0.25 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 $ 39 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 48.8 $ 1,540 Review applications of approval of construction 0.00 0.25 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.25 $ 302 $ 0 $ 0 2.0 20.5 $ 603 Review applications of approval of reconstruction, as Page 5 of 7 Exhibit 2: Agency Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical Clerical ConsultantRespondent Labor Capital/ # Of Total Total $ 65.37/ $ 41.49/ $ 29.12/ $ 17.70/ $ 41.49/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M Respondents Hours per Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Year applicable 0.00 0.25 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 $ 39 $ 0 $ 0 2.0 2.5 $ 79 Request additional relevant information 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 4.0 2.0 $ 63 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 4.0 2.0 $ 63 Subtotal 0.00 1.25 12.00 0.50 0.00 13.75 $ 410 $ 0 $ 2 75.8 $ 2,349 Adjustment to time periods or postmark deadlines for submittal and review of equiped communications Review requests for an adjustment to time periods or postmark deadlines for submittal and review of required informaiton 0.00 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 $ 50 $ 0 $ 0 10.0 15.0 $ 499 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 10.0 5.0 $ 158 Subtotal 0.00 0.75 1.00 0.25 0.00 2.00 $ 65 $ 0 $ 1 20.0 $ 657 Change in information already provided Review notifications of change( s) in the information already provided 0.00 0.25 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 $ 39 $ 0 $ 0 10.0 12.5 $ 395 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 10.0 5.0 $ 158 Subtotal 0.00 0.50 1.00 0.25 0.00 1.75 $ 54 $ 0 $ 1 17.5 $ 553 Request to reduce frequency of excess emissions an continuous monitoring system performance results Review requests to reduce the frequency of excess emissions and CMS performance reports 0.00 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 $ 50 $ 0 $ 0 4.0 6.0 $ 199 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 4.0 2.0 $ 63 Subtotal 0.00 0.75 1.00 0.25 0.00 2.00 $ 65 $ 0 $ 1 8.0 $ 263 Waiver of record keeping and reporting requirements Review waivers of recordkeeping or reporting 0.00 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 $ 50 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 0.75 1.00 0.25 0.00 2.00 $ 65 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 $ 0 Data compression Review requests for approval to use date compression technigues to record data on a less frequent basis 0.00 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 $ 50 $ 0 $ 0 10.0 15.0 $ 499 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 10.0 5.0 $ 158 Subtotal 0.00 0.75 1.00 0.25 0.00 2.00 $ 65 $ 0 $ 1 20.0 $ 657 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Startup shutdown and malfunction reports Review startup, shutdown, and malfunction report, as applicable 0.00 0.25 5.00 0.00 0.00 5.25 $ 156 $ 0 $ 0 10.0 52.5 $ 1,560 Review immediate startup, shutdown, and malfunction report, as applicable 0.00 0.25 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 $ 39 $ 0 $ 0 4.0 5.0 $ 158 Subtotal 0.00 0.50 6.00 0.00 0.00 6.50 $ 195 $ 0 $ 0 57.5 $ 1,718 Excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary report Review excess emissions and monitoring system performance reports and summary reports 0.00 0.25 5.00 0.00 0.00 5.25 $ 156 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 204.8 $ 6,082 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 39.0 19.5 $ 616 Page 6 of 7 Exhibit 2: Agency Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Legal Manager Technical Clerical ConsultantRespondent Labor Capital/ # Of Total Total $ 65.37/ $ 41.49/ $ 29.12/ $ 17.70/ $ 41.49/ Hours per Cost Startup O& M Respondents Hours per Cost per INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY hour hour hour hour hour Year Year Cost Cost or Activities Year Year Subtotal 0.00 0.50 5.00 0.25 0.00 5.75 $ 171 $ 0 $ 1 224.3 $ 6,698 RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS General recordkeeping requirements Inspect and review the files of all information ( including all reports and notifications), as necessary 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 $ 708 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 1560.0 $ 27,614 Subtotal 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 $ 708 $ 0 $ 0 1560.0 $ 27,614 EXTENSION OF THE COMPLIANCE DATE FOR WASTE MINIMIZATION OR POLLUTION PREVENTION Extension of the compliance date to install pollution prevention waste minimization controls Review requests for an extension of compliance date 0.00 1.00 4.00 0.25 0.00 5.25 $ 162 $ 0 $ 1 8.0 42.0 $ 1,307 Subtotal 0.00 1.00 4.00 0.25 0.00 5.25 $ 162 $ 0 $ 1 42.0 $ 1,307 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES FOR CEMS Performance Evaluation Review data collected from CEMS performance evaluation 0.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 5.50 $ 166 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 214.5 $ 6,487 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 492 39.0 19.5 $ 19,770 Subtotal 0.00 0.75 5.00 0.25 0.00 6.00 $ 181 $ 0 $ 492 234.0 $ 26,257 Use of alternative CEMS spans Review requests for approval to use alternative CEMS spans and ranges 0.00 1.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 $ 158 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 $ 15 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.00 1.25 4.00 0.25 0.00 5.50 $ 173 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 $ 0 Total ( Notification, Recordkeeping, Pollution Prevention, Quality Assurance for CEMS) 92.50 $ 2,314 $ 0 $ 502 2,259.0 $ 68,072 GRAND TOTAL 511.30 $ 13,057 $ 20 $ 642 9,942.7 $ 309,858 Page 7 of 7 Exhibit 3. Total Annual Respondent Burden and Cost Total Total Hours Per Cost Per Year Year Compliance with Standards and Operating Requirements 29,924 $ 1,873,114 Performance Testing Requirements 50,293 $ 6,717,587 Monitoring Requirements 32,188 $ 2,403,355 CMS Performance Evaluations 10,652 $ 687,041 Miscellaneous Notification Requirements 703 $ 42,340 Miscellaneous Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements 2,902 $ 104,414 Pollution Preventation or Waste Minimization 480 $ 28,847 Quality Assurance for CEMS 24,198 $ 1,694,879 TOTAL 151,339 $ 13,551,577 Exhibit 4. Total Annual EPA Burden and Cost Total Total Hours Per Cost Per Year Year Compliance with Standards and Operating Requirements 1,834 $ 56,009 Performance Testing Requirements 4,238 $ 129,276 Monitoring Requirements 1,305 $ 41,141 CMS Performance Evaluations 306 $ 15,360 Miscellaneous Notification Requirements 141 $ 4,477 Miscellaneous Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements 1,842 $ 36,030 Pollution Preventation or Waste Minimization 42 $ 1,307 Quality Assurance for CEMS 234 $ 26,257 TOTAL 9,943 $ 309,858


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 142 (Tuesday, July 24, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 35052]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15829]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No: FAA-2018-0526]

Corrections to Previous Notice Regarding Supplemental Guidance on
the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) for Fiscal Years 2018-2020

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of
Transportation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 9, 2018, the FAA published a Federal Register notice
announcing the process for eligible airport sponsors in two categories
to notify the FAA of any supplemental discretionary funding requests.
This notice addresses two omissions, one correction and one update.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elliott Black, Director, Office of
Airport Planning and Programming, APP-1, at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The July 9, 2018 notice required airport
sponsors to submit specific information via electronic mail (email) in
order to request supplemental funding. In addition to the original
requirements, for each request, the submission must also identify the
total capital cost of the proposed project and the amount of funding
being requested.
    In addition, the FAA is developing an optional form that may make
it easier for airports to ensure they provide all required information.
The FAA will post the form online at https://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/aip_supplemental_appropriation/. Accordingly, airports may still submit
their requests via electronic mail (email) as stated in the original
Federal Register notice, or they may complete the optional form and
transmit it via email. In addition, the FAA may eventually develop a
web-based electronic portal for submission of requests. If this
happens, then the FAA will post an announcement on the same website,
which now also supports automated notifications regarding updates for
users who choose to subscribe to the website.
    Finally, in the July 9 notice, footnotes #6, 7 and 9 incorrectly
referred to footnote #4.
    They should have referred instead to footnote #5.
    All other information, including submission requirements,
evaluation criteria and deadlines remain unchanged from the original
July 9 notice.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 18, 2018.
Elliott Black,
Director, Office of Airport Planning and Programming, Federal Aviation
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2018-15829 Filed 7-23-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 50 (Thursday, March 14, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16196-16198]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05872]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2013 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0239; Directorate Identifier 2010-SW-087-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH (ECD) EC 135 P1, P2, P2+, T1, T2, and T2+
helicopters equipped with a certain main transmission housing upper
part. This proposed AD would require installing a corrugated washer in
the middle of the main transmission filter housing upper part and
modifying the main transmission housing upper part. This proposed AD is
prompted by an inspection of housing upper parts that revealed the
bypass inlet in the oil filter area was not manufactured in accordance
with applicable design specifications. The proposed actions are
intended to prevent failure of the main transmission and subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 13, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket Operations Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the economic
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX
75052, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>,
or at http://www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth,
Texas 76137.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chinh Vuong, Aviation Safety Engineer,
Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
written comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to
the economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that might
result from adopting the proposals in this document. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters
should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed
electronically, commenters should submit only one time.
    We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as
a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this proposal, we
will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed after the comment period has
closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay.
We may change this proposal in light of the comments we receive.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued AD No.
2010-0213, dated October 14, 2010 (AD 2010-0213), to correct an unsafe
condition for the ECD model EC 135 and EC635 helicopters. EASA advises
that a recent inspection on some housing upper parts for the main
transmission FS108 revealed the bypass inlet in the oil filter area had
not been manufactured in accordance with the applicable design
specifications. EASA advises that this condition, if not detected and
corrected, could adversely affect the oil-filter bypass function, which
is essential for continued safe flight. The EASA AD requires a
temporary modification of the main transmission housing upper part by
installing a corrugated washer, and then a ``rework'' of the oil filter
area to bring the affected parts within the applicable design
specifications.

FAA's Determination

    These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of
the Republic of Germany and are approved for operation in the United
States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with Germany, EASA, its
technical representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition
described in its AD. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all
known relevant information and determined that an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Related Service Information

    ECD has issued Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) ASB EC135-63A-017,
Revision 0, dated October 11, 2010 (EC135-63A-017), which specifies
removing the oil filter element and installing a corrugated washer.
EC135-63A-017 also specifies reworking the affected filter housing
upper part at the next repair or major overhaul of the main
transmission, no later than 4,000 flight

hours after receipt of the service bulletin. EASA classified this ASB
as mandatory and issued AD 2010-0213 to ensure the continued
airworthiness of these helicopters.
    We have also reviewed ZF Luftfahrttechnik GmbH Service Instruction
No. EC135FS108-1659-1009, dated September 14, 2010, which specifies
procedures for repairing the main transmission upper housing, and
includes dimensions and tolerances for machining the housing upper
part.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require compliance with specified portions
of the manufacturer's service information. This proposed AD would
require:
     Within three months, installing a corrugated washer in the
filter housing of the housing upper part; and
     Within 4,000 hours time-in-service, modifying each
affected main transmission housing upper part by machining the oil
filter bypass inlet.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the EASA AD

    The EASA AD applies to Model EC 635 helicopters. The proposed AD
does not, as this model is not type-certificated in the U.S.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 227 helicopters of
U.S. Registry. Based on an average labor rate of $85 per work hour, we
estimate that operators may incur the following costs in order to
comply with this proposed AD. Installing the corrugated washer would
require about .5 work hour, and required parts would cost about $10,
for a cost per helicopter of about $53, and a total cost to the U.S.
operator fleet of $12,031. Machining the housing upper part would
require about 5 work-hours and required parts would cost about $73, for
a total cost per helicopter of $498, and a total cost to U.S. operators
of $113,046.
    According to the ECD ASB, some of the costs of this proposed AD may
be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage by Eurocopter.
Accordingly, we have included all costs in our cost estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed, I certify this proposed regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new Airworthiness
Directive (AD):

Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH: Docket No. FAA-2013-0239; Directorate
Identifier 2010-SW-087-AD.

(a) Applicability

    This AD applies to Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Model EC135 P1,
P2, P2+, T1, T2, and T2+ helicopters with a main transmission FS108
housing upper part, part number (P/N) 4649 301 034 and a serial
number listed in Table 1 of Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin EC135-
63A-017, Revision 0, dated October 11, 2010 (ASB EC135-63A-017),
certificated in any category.

(b) Unsafe Condition

    This AD defines the unsafe condition as an improperly
manufactured bypass inlet in the oil filter area. This condition
could adversely affect the oil-filter bypass function, resulting in
failure of the main transmission and subsequent loss of control of
the helicopter.

(c) Reserved

(d) Compliance

    You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.

(e) Required Actions

    (1) Within 3 months, remove the oil filter element and install a
corrugated washer, P/N<PHONE_NUMBER>, in the middle of the filter
housing of the housing upper part as depicted in Figure 2 of ASB
EC135-63A-017.
    (2) Within 4,000 hours time-in-service or at the next main
transmission repair or overhaul, whichever occurs first, machine the
main transmission housing upper part in accordance with Annex A of
ZF Luftfahrttechnik GmbH Service Instruction No. EC135FS108-1659-
1009, dated September 14, 2010.
    (3) Do not install a main transmission upper part, P/N 4649 301
034, on any helicopter unless it has been modified as required by
paragraphs (e)(1) through (e)(2) of this AD.

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOC)

    (1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: Chinh Vuong, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.

(g) Additional Information

    The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation Safety
Agency AD No. 2010-0213, dated October 14, 2010.

 (h) Subject

    Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6320: Main Rotor
Gearbox.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on March 6, 2013.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-05872 Filed 3-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 90 (Friday, May 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 26749]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10610]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14577-000]

Telluride Energy, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Competing Applications

    On January 15, 2014, Telluride Energy, LLC filed an application for
a preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power
Act, proposing to study the feasibility of the Hidden Dam Hydroelectric
Project (Hidden Dam Project or project) at the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers' (Corps) Lake Hensley and Hidden dam on the Fresno River,
near the city of Madera in Madera County, California. The sole purpose
of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant the permit holder
priority to file a license application during the permit term. A
preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder to perform any
land-disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands or waters
owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed project would consist of the following: (1) A new
penstock that would take water from the existing Hensley Lake; (2) a
new powerhouse at the base of the existing Hidden dam containing a
2.48-megawatt turbine-generator; (3) a new estimated 0.25-mile-long
primary transmission line connecting the project to Pacific Gas and
Electric Company's transmission lines west of the project; and; (4)
appurtenant facilities. The proposed project would have an estimated
average annual generation of 9,350 megawatt-hours and operate utilizing
releases from Lake Hensley, as directed by the Corps.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Kurt Johnson, Telluride Energy, LLC, 100
West Colorado, Suite 222, P.O. Box 1646, Telluride, CO 81435; phone:
(970) 729-5051.
    FERC Contact: Shana Murray; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and
competing applications may be filed electronically via the Internet.
See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's
Web site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail an original and seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-14577) in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: May 1, 2014.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-10610 Filed 5-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51055-51056]
[FR Doc No: 2019-20380]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R08-OAR-2019-0081; FRL-9999-66-Region 8]

Clean Data Determination; Salt Lake City, Utah 2006 Fine
Particulate Matter Standards Nonattainment Area

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing a
clean data determination (CDD) for the 2006 24-hour fine particulate
matter (PM2.5) Salt Lake City, Utah, (UT) nonattainment area
(NAA). The proposed determination is based upon quality-assured,
quality-controlled, and certified ambient air monitoring data for the
period 2016-2018, available in the EPA's Air Quality System (AQS)
database, showing the area has monitored attainment of the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Based
on our proposed determination that the Salt Lake City, UT NAA is
currently attaining the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS, the EPA is also
proposing to determine that the obligation for Utah to make submissions
to meet certain Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) requirements related to
attainment of the NAAQS for this area is not applicable for as long as
the area continues to attain the NAAQS.

DATES: This rule is effective on October 28, 2019.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R08-OAR-2019-0081. All documents in the docket are
listed on the http://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available through http://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Crystal Ostigaard, Air and Radiation
Division, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode 8ARD-QP, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado, 80202-1129,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' means the EPA.

I. Background

    On June 5, 2019 (84 FR 26053), we published a notice proposing a
CDD for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 Salt Lake City, UT NAA and
requested comments by July 5, 2019. Specifically, the proposed
determination was based upon quality-assured, quality-controlled, and
certified ambient air monitoring data for the period 2016-2018,
available in the AQS database, showing the area has attained the 2006
24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. Based on our proposed determination
that the Salt Lake City, UT NAA is currently attaining the 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS, the EPA also proposed to determine that the
obligation for Utah to make submissions to meet certain CAA
requirements related to attainment of the NAAQS for this area is not
applicable for as long as the area continues to attain the NAAQS.
    We received a request from the Center for Biological Diversity to
extend the comment period and, in response, we extended the comment
period to July 22, 2019 (84 FR 29455).

II. Response to Comments

    The EPA received a total of six comments on the proposed action
prior to the close of the public comment period. The first comment was
from the Center for Biological Diversity (requesting an extended
comment period), the second and third comments were from named
individuals, the fourth comment was anonymous, the fifth comment was
from the Utah Petroleum Association (UPA), and the sixth comment was
from the Center for Biological Diversity, HEAL Utah, and Western
Resource Advocates. Our Response to Comments document in the docket for
this action contains a summary of the comments and the EPA's responses.
The full text of the public comments, as well as all other documents
relevant to this action, are available in the docket (EPA-R08-OAR-2019-
0081).

III. Final Action

    No comments were submitted that changed our assessment of the
adequacy of the proposed CDD for the Salt Lake City PM2.5
NAA. For the reasons stated in our proposed notice the EPA is
finalizing a CDD for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 Salt Lake City,
UT NAA based on the area's current attainment of the standard. Pursuant
to 40 CFR 51.1015(a) and (b), the EPA is determining that the
obligation to submit any remaining attainment-related state
implementation plan (SIP) revisions arising from classification of the
Salt Lake City, UT area as a Moderate NAA and subsequent
reclassification as a Serious NAA under subpart 4 of part D (of title I
of the Act) for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS is not
applicable for so long as the area continues to attain the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS. In particular, as discussed in the proposed
action (84 FR 3373), the obligation for Utah to submit attainment
demonstrations, projected emissions inventories, reasonably available
control measures (including reasonably available control technology),
reasonable further progress plans, motor vehicle emissions budgets,
quantitative milestones, and contingency measures, for the Salt Lake
City, UT area are suspended until such time as: (1) The area is
redesignated to attainment, after which such requirements are
permanently discharged; or (2) the EPA determines that the area has re-
violated the PM2.5 NAAQS, at which time the State shall
submit such attainment plan elements for the Moderate and Serious NAA
plans by a future date to be determined by the EPA and announced
through publication in the Federal Register at the time the EPA
determines the area is violating the PM2.5 NAAQS.
    The CDD does not suspend Utah's obligation to submit CAA
requirements not related to demonstrating attainment, which includes
the base-year emission inventory, nonattainment new source review
revisions, and best available control measures/best available control
technology. This action does not constitute a redesignation to
attainment under CAA section 107(d)(3).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action finalizes a determination of attainment based on air
quality and suspends certain federal requirements, and thus would not
impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For
this reason, this final action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     Is not expected to be an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR
9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because this action is not
significant under Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);

     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 26, 2019. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review, nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: September 16, 2019.
Gregory Sopkin,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2019-20380 Filed 9-26-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 216 (Thursday, November 7, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 66841]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26734]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 1240

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0639]

Turtles Intrastate and Interstate Requirements; Confirmation of
Effective Date

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is confirming the
effective date of December 9, 2013, for the final rule that appeared in
the Federal Register of July 25, 2013. The direct final rule amends the
regulations regarding the prohibition on the sale, or other commercial
or public distribution, of viable turtle eggs and live turtles with a
carapace length of less than 4 inches to remove procedures for
destruction. This document confirms the effective date of the direct
final rule.

DATES: The December 9, 2013, effective date for the final rule
published July 25, 2013 (78 FR 44878), corrected October 25, 2013 (78
FR 63872), is confirmed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dillard Woody, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV-231), Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of July 25, 2013 (78
FR 44878 at 44879), FDA solicited comments concerning the direct final
rule for a 75-day period ending October 8, 2013. The document published
with an incorrect effective date of ``January 16, 2014.'' In the
Federal Register of October 25, 2013 (78 FR 63872), the effective date
was corrected to read ``December 9, 2013,'' 135 days after publication
in the Federal Register, unless any significant adverse comment was
submitted to FDA during the comment period. FDA did not receive any
significant adverse comments.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 216, 243, 264, 271. Accordingly, the
amendments issued thereby are effective.

    Dated: November 4, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-26734 Filed 11-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52461-52462]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20412]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0080; FRL-8795-02-OCSPP]

Pesticide Product Registration; Receipt of Applications for New
Uses (September 2021)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has received applications to register new uses for
pesticide products containing currently registered active ingredients.
Pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA), EPA is hereby providing notice of receipt and opportunity to
comment on these applications.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 21, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number and the File Symbol of interest as shown in the body of
this document, online at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/about-epa-dockets.
    Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is

closed to visitors with limited exceptions. The staff continues to
provide remote customer service via email, phone, and webform. For the
latest status information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Smith, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), main telephone number: (703)
305-7090, email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Marietta Echeverria,
Registration Division (7505P), main telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The mailing address for each
contact person is: Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001. As part of the mailing address, include the contact person's
name, division, and mail code. The division to contact is listed at the
end of each application summary.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

II. Registration Applications

    EPA has received applications to register new uses for pesticide
products containing currently registered active ingredients. Pursuant
to the provisions of FIFRA section 3(c)(4) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(4)), EPA
is hereby providing notice of receipt and opportunity to comment on
these applications. Notice of receipt of these applications does not
imply a decision by the Agency on these applications.

A. Notice of Receipt--New Uses

    1. EPA Registration Numbers: 100-1478, 100-1471, and 100-1476.
Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0417. Applicant: Syngenta Crop
Protection, LLC, P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419. Active
ingredient: Benzovindiflupyr. Product type: Fungicide. Proposed use:
Vegetable, root, except sugar beet, subgroup 1B, except ginseng.
Contact: RD.
    2. EPA Registration Numbers: 100-1609, 100-1601, 100-1648, and 100-
1603. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0446. Applicant: Syngenta Crop
Protection, LLC, P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419-8300. Active
ingredient: Pydiflumetofen. Product type: Fungicide. Proposed Use(s):
Foliar uses on caneberry subgroup 13-07A, greenhouse lettuce, and
greenhouse pepper. Seed treatment uses on cucurbit vegetables crop
group 9, edible-podded legume vegetables crop subgroup 6A, and
succulent shelled pea and bean crop subgroup 6B. Contact: RD.
    3. EPA Registration Numbers: 59639-211 and 50639-185. Docket ID
number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0045. Applicant: Valent U.S.A. LLC, P.O. Box
5075, San Ramon, CA 94583-0975. Active ingredient: Ethaboxam. Product
type: Fungicide. Proposed Uses: Brassica head and stem vegetables
(group 5-16) and Brassica leafy greens (crop subgroup 4-16B). Contact:
RD.
    4. EPA Registration Number: 59825-6. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-
2021-0550. Applicant: The Lubrizol Corporation, 29400 Lakeland Blvd.,
Wickliffe, OH 44092. Active ingredient: Tetraacetyl Ethylenediamine
(TAED). Product type: Bactericide, fungicide, insecticide, and
miticide. Proposed use: For use in the manufacturing of pesticide
products for disease control, pest control, and plant health on all
food commodities. Contact: BPPD.
    5. EPA File Symbol: 90866-GN and EPA Registration Number: 34704-
1057. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0469. Applicants: CH Biotech
R&D Co. Ltd., No. 89 Wenxian Rd., Nantou City, Nantou County 54041,
Taiwan R.O.C. (c/o CH Biotech LLC, 601 Kettering Dr., Ontario, CA
91761) and Loveland Products, Inc., P.O. Box 1286, Greeley, CO 80632-
1286. Active ingredient: Salicylic Acid. Product type: Plant regulator.
Proposed use: For abiotic stress reduction; food use. Contact: BPPD.
    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: September 13, 2021.
Delores Barber,
Director, Information Technology and Resources Management Division,
Office of Program Support.
[FR Doc. 2021-20412 Filed 9-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P