[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 28, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 79798-79801]
[FR Doc No: 2022-28221]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1649; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-01206-E;
Amendment 39-22284; AD 2022-26-05]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG
(Type Certificate previously held by Rolls-Royce plc) Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) TAY 620-15 and TAY 650-15
model turbofan engines. This AD was prompted by reports of cracks on
the high-pressure turbine (HPT) stage 2 intermediate air seal
attachment bolts (attachment bolts). This AD requires repetitive
inspections of the HPT stage 2 intermediate air seal and attachment
bolts and, depending on the results of the inspections, replacement of
attachment bolts and the HPT stage 1 and stage 2 rotor disks, as
specified in a European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which
is incorporated by reference. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective January 12, 2023.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of January 12,
2023.
    The FAA must receive comments on this AD by February 13, 2023.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2022-1649; or in person at Docket Operations between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this final rule, the mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
    Material Incorporated by Reference:
     For material incorporated by reference in this final rule,
contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; phone:
+49 221 8999 000; email: [email protected]. You may find this material
on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu.
     You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sungmo Cho, Aviation Safety Engineer,

ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:
(781) 238-7241; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written data, views, or arguments
about this final rule. Send your comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2022-1649; Project Identifier MCAI-
2022-01206-E'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the final rule, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this final rule because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this final rule.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this AD contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this AD, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this AD. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Sungmo
Cho, Aviation Safety Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is not
specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for
this rulemaking.

Background

    EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2022-0184, dated September 2, 2022
(EASA AD 2022-0184) (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for all RRD TAY 620-15 and TAY 650-15 model
turbofan engines. The MCAI states that cracks on attachment bolts have
been reported which, if not detected and corrected, could result in
failure of HPT stage 1 and stage 2 rotor disks, high energy debris
release, damage to the airplane, and reduced control of the airplane.
    The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket under Docket No. FAA-
2022-1649.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed EASA AD 2022-0184, dated September 2, 2022, which
specifies procedures for repetitive inspections of the HPT stage 2
intermediate air seal and attachment bolts and, depending on the
findings, replacement of all damaged parts.
    This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in ADDRESSES.

FAA's Determination

    These products have been approved by the aviation authority of
another country, and are approved for operation in the United States.
Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design
Authority, it has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition referenced
in the MCAI described above. The FAA is issuing this AD after
determining that the unsafe condition described previously is likely to
exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

AD Requirements

    This AD requires accomplishing the actions specified in EASA AD
2022-0184, described previously, except for any differences identified
as exceptions in the regulatory text of this AD and except as discussed
under ``Differences Between this AD and the MCAI.''

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation
authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has since
coordinated with other manufacturers and CAAs to use this process. As a
result, EASA AD 2022-0184 will be incorporated by reference in this
final rule. This AD, therefore, requires compliance with EASA AD 2022-
0184 in its entirety through that incorporation, except for any
differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this AD.
Using common terms that are the same as the heading of a particular
section in the EASA AD does not mean that operators need comply only
with that section. For example, where the AD requirement refers to
``all required actions and compliance times,'' compliance with this AD
requirement is not limited to the section titled ``Required Action(s)
and Compliance Time(s)'' in EASA AD 2022-0184. Service information
required by the EASA AD for compliance will be available at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2022-1649.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI

    Where EASA AD 2022-0184 requires replacement of all damaged parts,
this AD requires replacement of attachment bolts and the HPT stage 1
and stage 2 rotor disks.

Justification for Immediate Adoption and Determination of the Effective
Date

    Section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 551 et seq.) authorizes agencies to dispense with notice and
comment procedures for rules when the agency, for ``good cause,'' finds
that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to
the public interest.'' Under this section, an agency, upon finding good
cause, may issue a final rule without providing notice and seeking
comment prior to issuance. Further, section 553(d) of the APA
authorizes agencies to make rules effective in less than thirty days,
upon a finding of good cause.
    There are currently no domestic operators of these products.
Accordingly, notice and opportunity for prior public comment are
unnecessary, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). In addition, for the
foregoing reason, the FAA finds that good cause exists pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(d) for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days
for the same reasons the FAA found good cause to forego notice and
comment.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) do not
apply when an agency finds good cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt
a rule without prior notice and comment. Because the FAA has determined
that it has good cause to adopt this rule without notice and comment,
RFA analysis is not required.

Costs of Compliance

    Currently, there are no U.S. registered airplanes with the affected
engines installed. If an affected engine is installed on an airplane,
or if an airplane with an affected engine is imported and placed on the
U.S. Register in the future, the FAA provides the following cost
estimates to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
               Action                        Labor cost           Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repetitive inspection of the HPT      3 work-hours x $85 per               $0             $255               $0
 stage 2 intermediate air seal and     hour = $255.
 attachment bolts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary
replacements that would be required based on the results of the
inspection.

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                    Action                                Labor cost               Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replace attachment bolts and HPT stage 1 and   6 work-hours x $85 per hour =          $280,189         $280,699
 stage 2 rotor disks.                           $510.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866, and
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2022-26-05 Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (Type Certificate
previously held by Rolls-Royce plc): Amendment 39-22284; Docket No.
FAA-2022-1649; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-01206-E.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective January 12, 2023.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG TAY 620-
15 and TAY 650-15 model turbofan engines.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7240, Turbine Engine
Combustion Section.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of cracks on high-pressure
turbine (HPT) stage 2 intermediate air seal attachment bolts
(attachment bolts). The FAA is issuing this AD to prevent failure of
the HPT stage 1 and stage 2 rotor disks. The unsafe condition, if
not addressed, could result in high energy debris release, damage to
the airplane, and reduced control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    Except as specified in paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD:
Perform all required actions within the compliance times specified
in, and in accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2022-0184, dated September 2, 2022 (EASA AD 2022-0184).

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2022-0184

    (1) Where EASA AD 2022-0184 requires compliance from its
effective date, this AD requires using the effective date of this
AD.
    (2) Where EASA AD 2022-0184 requires replacement of all damaged
parts, this AD requires replacing cracked attachment bolts and HPT
stage 1 and stage 2 rotor disks that show evidence of wear from
broken attachment bolts.
    (3) Where the service information referenced in EASA AD 2022-
0184 specifies to replace the engine and send the removed engine to
an approved TAY overhaul facility if indications of damage are
found, this AD requires replacing cracked attachment bolts and HPT
stage 1 and stage 2 rotor disks that show evidence of wear from
broken attachment bolts.
    (4) This AD does not adopt the ``Remarks'' paragraph of EASA AD
2022-0184.

(i) No Reporting Requirement

    Although the service information referenced in EASA AD 2022-0184
specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD
does not include that requirement.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (k) of this AD and email to: [email protected]. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.

(k) Additional Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Sungmo Cho, Aviation
Safety Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington,
MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency AD 2022-0184, dated
September 2, 2022.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For more information about EASA AD 2022-0184, contact EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; phone: +49 221 8999
000; email: [email protected]. You may find this EASA AD on the
EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email: [email protected], or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on December 14, 2022.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-28221 Filed 12-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9043-9052]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03668]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-77164; File No. SR-FINRA-2015-048]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Partial Amendment No. 1 and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval to a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Partial Amendment No. 1, To Adopt FINRA Rule 6191(b) and Amend FINRA
Rule 7440 To Implement the Data Collection Requirements of the
Regulation NMS Plan To Implement a Tick Size Pilot Program

February 17, 2016.

I. Introduction

    On November 13, 2015, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority,
Inc. (``FINRA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'' or ``SEC''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to
adopt FINRA Rule 6191(b) and amend FINRA Rule 7440 to implement the
Regulation NMS Plan to Implement a Tick Size Pilot Program (``Tick Size
Pilot'').\3\ The proposed rule change was published in the Federal
Register on November 25, 2015.\4\ On February 12, 2016, FINRA filed
Partial Amendment No. 1 to the proposal.\5\ The Commission received
three comments on the proposal.\6\ On January 7, 2016, the Commission
designated a longer period for Commission action on the proposal.\7\
This order approves the proposed rule change, as modified by Partial
Amendment No. 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74892 (May 6, 2015),
80 FR 27513 (May 13, 2015) (``Approval Order'').
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76484 (November 19,
2015), 80 FR 73858.
    \5\ In Partial Amendment No. 1, FINRA proposes to: (1) Require
members to provide the Retail Investor Order flag in OATS execution-
related reports; (2) delete the requirement that FINRA members
report data for execution on venues that do not report to FINRA; and
(3) change the reference in Supplementary Material .03 for
securities that trade in both the U.S. and in a foreign market from
``dually-listed'' to ``securities that may trade in a foreign
market.''
    \6\ See letters from Mary Lou Von Kaenel, Managing Director,
Financial Information Forum, dated December 16, 2015 (``FIF Letter
I) and January 25, 2016 (``FIF Letter II''); and Manisha Kimmel,
Chief Regulatory Officer, Wealth Management, Thomson Reuters, dated
December 16, 2015 (``Thomson Reuters Letter'') to Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary, Commission. On February 12, 2016, FINRA submitted
a response to the comments. See letter from Andrew Madar, Associate
General Counsel, Regulatory Policy and Oversight, FINRA to Brent J.
Fields, Secretary, Commission dated February 12, 2016 (``FINRA
Response'').
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76854, 81 FR 1670
(January 13, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Background

    On August 25, 2014, NYSE Group, Inc., on behalf of BATS Exchange,
Inc., BATS Y-Exchange, Inc., Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., EDGA
Exchange, Inc., EDGX Exchange, Inc., FINRA, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc., NASDAQ
OMX PHLX LLC, the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, New York Stock Exchange LLC,
NYSE MKT LLC, and NYSE Arca, Inc. (collectively ``Participants''),
filed with the Commission, pursuant to Section 11A of the Act \8\ and
Rule 608 of Regulation NMS thereunder,\9\ the Plan to Implement the
Tick Size Pilot Program (``Plan'').\10\ The Participants filed the Plan
to comply with an order issued by the Commission on June 24, 2014.\11\
The Plan was published for comment in the Federal Register on November
7, 2014,\12\ and approved by the Commission, as modified, on May 6,
2015.\13\ On November 6, 2015, the Commission issued an exemption to
the Participants from implementing the Plan until October 3, 2016.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1.
    \9\ 17 CFR 242.608.
    \10\ See Letter from Brendon J. Weiss, Vice President,
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., to Secretary, Commission, dated
August 25, 2014.
    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72460, 79 FR 36840
(June 30, 2014).
    \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73511 (November 3,
2014), 79 FR 66423.
    \13\ See Approval Order, supra note 3.
    \14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76382, 80 FR 70284
(November 13, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Tick Size Pilot is designed to allow the Commission, market
participants, and the public to study and assess the impact of
increment conventions on the liquidity and trading of the common stocks
of certain small-capitalization companies. Each Participant is required
to comply, and to enforce compliance by its members, as applicable,
with the provisions of the Plan.\15\ In addition to developing quoting
and trading requirements for the Tick Size Pilot, the Plan requires
Participants to collect and submit to the Commission a variety of data,
including market quality statistics and market maker participation
statistics and profitability data.\16\ FINRA has filed the proposed
rule change, as modified by Partial Amendment No. 1, to require its
members to comply with the applicable data collection requirements of
the Plan. In addition, FINRA proposes to clarify certain of the data
collection provisions.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Rule 608(c) of Regulation NMS. 17 CFR 242.608(c). See also
Plan Sections II.B. and IV.
    \16\ See Appendices B and C to the Plan.
    \17\ FINRA, on behalf of the Plan Participants, submitted a
letter to Commission requesting exemption from certain provisions of
the Plan related to data collection. See letter from Marcia E.
Asquith, Senior Vice President and Corporate Secretary, FINRA dated
December 9, 2015 to Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary, Commission
(``Exemption Request''). The Commission, pursuant to its authority
under Rule 608(e) of Regulation NMS, has granted FINRA a limited
exemption from the requirement to comply with certain provisions of
the Plan as specified in the letter and noted herein. See letter
from David Shillman, Associate Director, Division of Trading and
Markets, Commission, to Marcia E. Asquith, Senior Vice President and
Corporate Secretary, FINRA, dated February 17, 2016 (``SEC Exemption
Letter'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Description of the Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Partial
Amendment No. 1

    FINRA proposes to adopt Rule 6191(b), which sets forth the data
collection requirements under the Plan. Proposed Rule 6191(b)(1) would
require that a member that operates a Trading Center \18\ shall
establish, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures that
are reasonably designed to comply with the data collection and
transmission requirements of Items I and II to Appendix B of the Plan,
and a member that is a Market Maker shall establish, maintain and
enforce written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to
comply with the data collection and transmission requirements of Item
IV of Appendix B to the Plan and Item I of Appendix C of the Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ Capitalized terms used in this Order are defined in the
Plan, unless otherwise specified herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 6191(b)(2) sets forth the Trading Center data
requirements. Under proposed Rule 6191(b)(2)(A)(i), a member that
operates a Trading Center subject to the Plan and for which FINRA is
the Designated Examining Authority (``DEA'') shall collect and transmit
to FINRA the data described in Items I and II of Appendix B of the Plan
with respect to each Pre-Pilot Data Collection Security \19\ for the
period beginning six months prior to the Pilot Period through the
trading day immediately preceding the Pilot Period (``Pre-Pilot
Period''); and each Pilot Security for the period beginning on the
first day of the Pilot Period through six months after the end of the
Pilot Period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ As discussed herein, FINRA proposes to establish data
collection requirements for securities designated as Pre-Pilot Data
Collection Securities for the period that begins six months prior to
the Pilot Period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 6191(b)(2)(A)(ii) provides that members that operate
Trading Centers that are subject to the Plan, and for which FINRA is
the DEA, shall meet the data collection and reporting requirements in
Items I and II of Appendix B by reporting the required order
information in Pilot Securities and Pre-Pilot Data Collection
Securities to OATS. The proposed rule change adds four new fields to
OATS to enable OATS to capture the necessary Tick Size Pilot data.\20\
Specifically, FINRA proposes that OATS Reporting Members \21\ that
operate a Trading Center will collect and transmit to FINRA the
following information for orders received or originated involving

Pilot Securities and Pre-Pilot Data Collection Securities:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ In its filing, FINRA noted that it would add additional
values to existing OATS fields necessary to implement requirements
of the Tick Size Pilot. The new values are described in the OATS
Reporting Technical Specifications. FINRA will also provide
additional guidance in the OATS Reporting Technical Specifications
regarding the use of existing values that may be affected by members
participating in the Tick Size Pilot.
    \21\ FINRA Rule 7410(o) generally defines ``Reporting Member''
as a member that receives or originates an order and has an
obligation to record and report information under FINRA Rules 7440
and 7450.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (a) Whether the member is a Trading Center in either a Pilot
Security or a Pre-Pilot Data Collection Security;
    (b) If the member is an Alternative Display Facility (``ADF'')
Market Participant under FINRA Rule 6220, the display size of the
order; and
    (c) Whether the order is routable.
    In Partial Amendment No. 1, FINRA proposes that members shall
identify whether the member is relying on the Retail Investor Order
exception with respect to the execution of order.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ FINRA has requested an exemption from the Plan related to
this provision. See Exemption Request, supra note 17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For purposes of subparagraph (a), FINRA notes that only those OATS
Reporting Members that operate a Trading Center and for which FINRA is
the DEA are required to make changes to their OATS reporting. OATS
Reporting Members that do not operate Trading Centers or that have
another self-regulatory organization as DEA will be permitted to leave
the new fields blank (i.e., they are not required to populate the new
Trading Center field to affirmatively indicate that they are not a
Trading Center). OATS Reporting Members that operate Trading Centers
will be required to indicate their status as a Trading Center on all
OATS reports for new orders involving Pre-Pilot Data Collection
Securities and Pilot Securities, including New Order Reports, Combined
Order/Route Reports, Combined Order Execution Reports, and Cancel/
Replace Reports.
    For purposes of subparagraph (b), FINRA notes that OATS Reporting
Members that operate Trading Centers and also are ADF Market
Participants \23\ will be required to indicate their status as an ADF
Market Participant and must indicate the display size of the order so
that OATS can capture the information required by Appendix B regarding
hidden and displayed size.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ FINRA Rule 6220(a)(3) defines ``ADF Market Participant'' or
``Market Participant'' as a Registered Reporting ADF Market Maker,
as defined in FINRA Rule 6220(a)(13), or a Registered Reporting ADF
ECN, as defined in FINRA Rule 6220(a)(12).
    \24\ Items I(a)(5), (29), and (30) of Appendix B to the Plan
each require that hidden (i.e., non-displayed) order information be
collected.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA proposes to add a new OATS field under subparagraphs (c) to
capture the information required by Item II(o) of Appendix B to the
Plan. This information will be required on all OATS reports for new
orders, including New Order Reports, Combined Order/Route Reports,
Combined Order/Execution Reports, and Cancel/Replace Reports.
    Finally, FINRA proposes to add a new OATS field under proposed Rule
6191(b)(A)(iii) to capture information required under Item II(n) of
Appendix B to the Plan. As described in Partial Amendment No. 1, FINRA
will require members to add a flag to OATS execution reports for those
orders that rely on the Retail Investor Order exceptions provided under
Test Groups Two and Three.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ In Partial Amendment No. 1, FINRA deleted the proposed
requirement in proposed Rule 6191(b)(2)(A)(iv) to require
information on foreign executions and executions on domestic venues
which do not provide execution information to FINRA. In Partial
Amendment No. 1, FINRA stated that it has agreements with all equity
exchanges to receive data for executions in Pre-Pilot Data
Collection Securities and Pilot Securities that occur on those
venues. For foreign markets, FINRA stated that it could obtain the
necessary information through existing OATS data that would be
sufficient to analyze the impact of the Tick Size Pilot on the
number of orders routed to foreign markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 6191(b)(2)(B) provides that FINRA shall transmit the
data required by Items I and II of Appendix B to the Plan, and
collected pursuant to FINRA Rule 6191(b)(2)(A), to the SEC in a pipe-
delimited format on a disaggregated basis by Trading Center within 30
calendar days following month end. FINRA also shall make such data
publicly available on the FINRA Web site on a monthly basis at no
charge and will not identify the Trading Center that generated the
data.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ FINRA has requested an exemption from the Plan related to
this provision. See Exemption Request, supra note 17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 6191(b)(3)(A) provides that a member that is a Market
Maker \27\ for which FINRA is the DEA shall collect and transmit to
FINRA data relating to Item IV of Appendix B to the Plan with respect
to activity conducted on any Trading Center in furtherance of its
status as a Market Maker, including a Trading Center that executes
trades otherwise than on a national securities exchange, for
transactions that have settled or reached settlement date. The proposed
rule requires Market Makers to transmit such data in a pipe-delimited
format, by 12 p.m. EST on T+4 for (1) transactions in each Pre-Pilot
Data Collection Security for the Pre-Pilot Period; and (2) for
transactions in each Pilot Security for the period beginning on the
first day of the Pilot Period through six months after the end of the
Pilot Period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ The Plan defines a ``Market Maker'' as ``a dealer
registered with any self-regulatory organization, in accordance with
the rules thereof, as (i) a market maker or (ii) a liquidity
provider with an obligation to maintain continuous, two-sided
trading interest.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 6191(b)(3)(B) provides that FINRA shall transmit the
data relating to Market Maker activity required by Item IV of Appendix
B to the Plan, and collected pursuant to paragraph (b)(3)(A), to the
Participant operating the Trading Center on which such activity
occurred in a pipe-delimited format on a disaggregated basis by Market
Maker during the Pre-Pilot Period and within 15 calendar days following
month end during the Pilot Period.
    Proposed Rule 6191(b)(3)(C) provides that FINRA shall transmit the
data relating to Market Maker activity conducted otherwise than on a
national securities exchange required by Item IV of Appendix B to the
Plan, and collected pursuant to paragraph (b)(3)(A), to the SEC in a
pipe-delimited format, on a disaggregated basis by Trading Center,
within 30 calendar days following month end. FINRA shall also make such
data publicly available on the FINRA Web site on a monthly basis at no
charge and will not identify the Trading Center that generated the
data.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ FINRA has requested an exemption from the Plan related to
this provision. See Exemption Request, supra note 17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 6191(b)(4) sets forth the requirements for the
collection and transmission of data pursuant to Appendix C.I of the
Plan. Proposed Rule 6191(b)(4)(A) requires that a member that is a
Market Maker, and for which FINRA is the DEA, shall collect and
transmit to FINRA the data described in Item I of Appendix C to the
Plan, as modified by Rule 6191(b)(5) with respect to executions that
have settled or reached settlement date that were executed on any
Trading Center. Market Makers will provide such data in a pipe-
delimited format by 12 p.m. EST on T+4: (1) For executions during and
outside of Regular Trading Hours in each Pre-Pilot Data Collection
Security for the Pre-Pilot Period; and (2) for executions during and
outside of Regular Trading Hours in each Pilot Security for the period
beginning on the first day of the Pilot Period through six months after
the end of the Pilot Period.
    Proposed Rule 6191(b)(4)(B) provides that FINRA shall collect the
data required by Item I of Appendix C to the Plan on a monthly basis,
transmit such data, categorized by the Control Group and each Test
Group, to the SEC in a pipe-delimited format; the data transmitted to
the SEC shall include the profitability statistics categorized by
Market Maker and by security. FINRA shall also make aggregated data
required by Item I of Appendix C to the Plan, and collected pursuant to
(b)(4)(A) categorized by the Control Group and each Test Group,
publically available on the FINRA Web site on a monthly basis

at no charge and shall not identify the Market Makers that generated
the data or the individual securities.
    Proposed Rule 6191(b)(5) sets forth the manner in which Market
Maker participation statistics and profitability will be calculated.
Proposed Rule 6191(b)(5) provides that a member that is a Market Maker
subject to the requirements of proposed Rule 6191(b)(3)(A) and
(b)(4)(A) in a Pre-Pilot Data Collection Security or a Pilot Security,
and for which FINRA is the DEA, shall be deemed to have satisfied the
requirements of proposed Rule 6191(b)(3)(A) and (b)(4)(A), in addition
to the requirements of Item IV of Appendix B and Item I of Appendix C,
if such Market Maker submits to FINRA the following specified data for
any principal trade, not including a riskless principal trade, in a
Pre-Pilot Data Collection Security or a Pilot Security executed in
furtherance of its status as a Market Maker on any Trading Center: (1)
Ticker Symbol; (2) Trading Center where the trade was executed, or if
not known, the destination where the order originally was routed for
further handling and execution; (3) Time of execution; (4) Price; (5)
Size; (6) Buy/sell; (7) for trades executed away from the Market Maker,
a unique identifier, as specified by the Market Maker's DEA, that will
allow the trade to be associated with the Trading Center where the
trade was executed; and (8) for trades cancelled or corrected beyond
T+3, whether the trade represents a cancellation or correction.
    FINRA proposes to adopt certain Supplementary Material to Rule
6191(b) to clarify other aspects of the data collection requirements.
First, FINRA proposes to clarify in Supplementary Material .01 that the
terms used in Rule 6191(b) shall have the same meaning as provided in
the Plan, unless otherwise specified. In proposed Supplementary
Material .02, FINRA proposes to clarify a reporting requirement for
Retail Investor Orders for purposes of Appendix B.II(n). Specifically,
FINRA proposes that a Trading Center shall report ``Y'' when it is
relying upon the Retail Investor Order exception to Test Groups Two and
Three with respect to the execution of the order, and ``N'' in all
other instances.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ See Partial Amendment No. 1. FINRA has requested an
exemption from the Plan related to this provision. See Exemption
Request, supra note 17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In proposed Supplementary Material .03, FINRA proposes to require
that for purposes of Appendix B.I, a field identified as ``Affected by
Limit-Up Limit-Down bands'' \30\ be included. Under this proposal, a
Trading Center shall report a value of ``Y'' when the ability of an
order to execute has been affected by the Limit-Up Limit-Down bands in
effect at the time of order receipt. A Trading Center shall report a
value of ``N'' when the ability of an order to execute has not been
affected by the Limit-Up Limit-Down bands in effect at the time of
order receipt.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See National Market System Plan to Address Extraordinary
Market Volatility, Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May
31, 2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012) (File No. 4-631) (``Limit Up
Limit Down Plan'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, proposed Supplementary Material .03 requires that, for
Appendix B.I purposes, Participants shall classify all orders in Pilot
and Pre-Pilot Data Collection Securities that may trade in a foreign
market as fully executed domestically or fully or partially executed on
a foreign market. For purposes of Appendix B.II, Participants shall
classify all orders in Pilot and Pre-Pilot Data Collection Securities
that may trade in a foreign market as: Directed to a domestic venue for
execution; may only be directed to a foreign venue for execution; or
fully or partially directed to a foreign venue at the discretion of a
member.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See Partial Amendment No. 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In proposed Supplementary Material .04, FINRA proposes to modify
the reporting requirements under Appendix B.I.a(14), B.I.a(15),
B.I.a(21) and B.I.a(22).\32\ Specifically, FINRA proposes the
following: Appendix B.I.a(14A): The cumulative number of shares of
orders executed from 100 microseconds to less than 1 millisecond after
the time of order receipt; Appendix B.I.a(15): The cumulative number of
shares of orders executed from 1 millisecond to less than 100
milliseconds after the time of order receipt; Appendix B.I.a(21A): The
cumulative number of shares of orders canceled from 100 microseconds to
less than 1 millisecond after the time of order receipt; and Appendix
B.I.a(22): The cumulative number of shares of orders canceled from 1
millisecond to less than 100 milliseconds after the time of order
receipt.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ FINRA has requested an exemption from the Plan related to
this provision. See Exemption Request, supra note 17. Appendix
B.I.a(14) requires reporting of the cumulative number of shares of
orders executed from 0 to less than 100 microseconds after the time
of order receipt; Appendix B.I.a(15) requires reporting of the
cumulative number of shares or orders executed from 100 microseconds
to less than 100 milliseconds after the time of order receipt;
Appendix B.I.a(21) requires reporting of the cumulative number of
shares of orders cancelled from 0 to less than 100 microseconds
after the time of order receipt; and Appendix B.I.a(22) requires
reporting of the cumulative number of shares or orders cancelled
from 100 microseconds to less than 100 milliseconds after the time
of order receipt.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In proposed Supplementary Material .05, FINRA proposes to add the
requirement in Appendix B.I.a(33) relating to the share-weighted
average BBO Spread to a Trading Center that displays on the ADF. In
proposed Supplementary Material .06, FINRA proposes to calculate data
based upon the time of order receipt for purposes of Appendix
B.I.a(31)-(33) \33\ In proposed Supplementary Material .07, FINRA
proposes to clarify that, for purposes of Appendix B.I.a(33), only a
Trading Center that is displaying in its own name as a Trading Center
when executing an order shall enter a value in this field.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ FINRA has requested an exemption from the Plan related to
this provision. See Exemption Request, supra note 17.
    \34\ FINRA believes that the Appendix B.I.a(33) reporting
requirement is only relevant for a Trading Center that is a display
venue and not Trading Centers that may display through other Trading
Centers (such as a market maker displaying a quote on a national
securities exchange).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In proposed Supplementary Material .08, FINRA proposes to
specifically identify certain orders types for purposes of Appendix B
reporting. In particular, not held orders, assigned the number (18);
clean cross orders, assigned the number (19); auction orders, assigned
the number (20); and orders that cannot be otherwise be classified,
including, for example, orders received when the NBBO is crossed,
assigned the number (21), shall be specifically identified in the data
reports.
    In proposed Supplementary Material .09, FINRA proposes to clarify
the scope of the Plan as it relates to members that only execute orders
for limited purposes. Specifically, proposed Supplementary Material .09
clarifies that a member shall not be deemed a Trading Center for
purposes of Appendix B of the Plan where that member only executes
orders otherwise than on a national securities exchange for the purpose
of: (1) Correcting a bona fide error related to the execution of a
customer order; (2) purchasing a security from a customer at a nominal
price solely for purposes of liquidating the customer's position; or
(3) completing the fractional share portion of an order.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ FINRA notes that when a member purchases a fractional share
from a customer, the Trading Center that executes the remaining
whole shares of that customer order would be subject to Appendix B
of the Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In proposed Supplementary Material .10, FINRA clarifies that
Trading Centers must begin the data collection

required pursuant to Appendix B.I.a(1) through B.II.(y) to the Plan and
Item I of Appendix C to the Plan on April 4, 2016. In addition, FINRA
proposes that it will provide information to the SEC within 30 calendar
days following month end and make such data publicly available on its
Web site pursuant to Appendix B and C to the Plan at the beginning of
the Pilot Period.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ FINRA has requested an exemption from the Plan related to
this provision. See Exemption Request, supra note 17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In proposed Supplementary Material .11, FINRA proposes for purposes
of Item I of Appendix C that the Participants shall calculate daily
Market Maker realized profitability statistics for each trading day on
a last-in, first out (LIFO) basis using reported trade price and shall
include only trades executed on the subject trading day.\37\ The daily
LIFO calculation shall not include any positions carried over from
previous trading days. The proposal also provides that for purposes of
Item I.c of Appendix C, the Participants shall calculate daily Market
Maker unrealized profitability statistics for each trading day on an
average price basis. Specifically, the Participants must calculate the
volume weighted average price of the excess (deficit) of buy volume
over sell volume for the current trading day using reported trade
price. The gain (loss) of the excess (deficit) of buy volume over sell
volume shall be determined by using the volume weighted average price
compared to the closing price of the security as reported by the
primary listing exchange. In calculating unrealized trading profits,
the Participant shall also report the number of excess (deficit) shares
held by the Market Maker, the volume weighted average price of that
excess (deficit) and the closing price of the security as reported by
the primary listing exchange used in reporting unrealized profit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ FINRA has requested an exemption from the Plan related to
this provision. See Exemption Request, supra note 17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In proposed Supplementary Material .12, FINRA proposes to identify
the securities that will be subject to the data collection requirements
prior to the commencement of the Pilot Period. Proposed Supplementary
Material .12 defines ``Pre-Pilot Data Collection Securities'' as the
securities designated by the Participants for purposes of the data
collection requirements described in Items I, II and IV of Appendix B
and Item I of Appendix C to the Plan for the Pre-Pilot Period. The
Participants shall compile the list of Pre-Pilot Data Collection
Securities by selecting all NMS stocks with a market capitalization of
$5 billion or less, a Consolidated Average Daily Volume (``CADV'') of 2
million shares or less and a closing price of $1 per share or more. The
market capitalization and the closing price thresholds shall be applied
to the last day of the Pre-Pilot measurement period, and the CADV
threshold shall be applied to the duration of the Pre-Pilot measurement
period. The Pre-Pilot measurement period shall be the three calendar
months ending on the day when the Pre-Pilot Data Collection Securities
are selected. The Pre-Pilot Data Collection Securities shall be
selected thirty days prior to the commencement of the six-month Pre-
Pilot Period. FINRA notes that beginning with the first trading day of
the Pilot Period through six months after the end of the Pilot Period,
the data collection requirements will become applicable to the Pilot
Securities only.
    Finally, proposed Supplementary Material .13 provides that the Rule
shall be in effect during a pilot period to coincide with the Pilot
Period for the Plan (including any extensions to the Pilot Period for
the Plan).

IV. Discussion and Findings

    After careful review of the proposal and the comment letters, the
Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as modified by Partial
Amendment No. 1, is consistent the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder that are applicable to a national
securities association.\38\ Specifically, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with Section 15A(b)(6) of the
Act,\39\ which requires, among other things, that FINRA's rules be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest, and are not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. In addition, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section
15A(b)(9) of the Act,\40\ which requires that FINRA rules not impose
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \39\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
    \40\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has previously stated that the Tick Size Pilot set
forth in the Plan should provide a data-driven approach to evaluate
whether certain changes to the market structure for Pilot Securities
would be consistent with the Commission's mission to protect investors,
maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitate capital
formation.\41\ As discussed below, the Commission believes that FINRA's
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act, and would
further the purpose of the Plan to provide measurable data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \41\ See Approval Order, supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA, as a Participant in the Plan, has an obligation to comply,
and enforce compliance by its members, with the terms of the Plan. Rule
608(c) of Regulation NMS provides that ``[e]ach self-regulatory
organization shall comply with the terms of any effective national
market system plan of which it is a sponsor or participant. Each self-
regulatory organization also shall, absent reasonable justification or
excuse, enforce compliance with any such plan by its members and
persons associated with its members.'' \42\ FINRA's proposed Rule
6191(b) would impose compliance obligations on its members with the
data collection requirements set forth in Appendices B and C to the
Plan. The Commission also believes the proposal is consistent with the
Act because it is designed to assist FINRA in meeting its regulatory
obligations pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS and the Plan.\43\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\ 17 CFR 242.608(c).
    \43\ Sections II.B and IV of the Plan each require Participants
to comply with, and enforce compliance by its members, with the
Plan. See Approval Order, 80 FR at 27548, supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA proposes to use OATS to collect the Trading Center data
specified in Appendix B.I and II under the Plan from its members. FINRA
proposes changes to OATS to require new data elements that are
necessary to accommodate the data requirements under the Plan. The new
OATS requirements will only apply to those members that operate a
Trading Center subject to the Tick Size Pilot and for which FINRA is
the DEA. In its letter, FIF recognized that by using OATS, ``FINRA has
taken much of the burden from industry members in terms of
categorization of orders and calculation of execution quality and
market makers' profitability statistics.'' \44\ The Commission believes
that the use of OATS to collect Tick Size Pilot data from FINRA members
should facilitate

the efficient implementation of the data collection requirements under
the Plan because FINRA members will be able to utilize an existing
system. Further, the use of OATS should enhance the usefulness of the
data because the data will be collected and submitted to the Commission
and the public in a consistent format.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \44\ See FIF Letter I. In its letter, Thomson Reuters stated
their understanding of several OATS reports, including the Tick Size
Participation Flag, the Display Flag and the Routable Flag. See
Thomson Reuters Letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA proposes several new data elements for OATS to accommodate
the Tick Size Pilot data requirements, including whether the member is
a Trading Center in either a Pilot Security or Pre-Pilot Data
Collection Security, if the member is an ADF Market Participant and
whether the order is routable. The Commission finds that these new data
elements support the data collection requirements under the Tick Size
Pilot.
    In addition, FINRA originally proposed that members identify in
OATS those orders that rely on the Retail Investor Order exception in
Test Groups Two and Three. As discussed below, this provision was
further clarified in proposed Supplemental Material .02 by noting that
for purposes of reporting, a Trading Center shall report a ``Y'' when
it is relying upon the Retail Investor Order exceptions in Test Groups
Two and Three and ``N'' in all other instances.\45\ The two commenters
to the proposal noted that identifying orders that rely on the Retail
Investor Order exceptions prior to execution would be difficult.\46\
One commenter stated that it would be operationally complex to
determine the eligibility of a Retail Investor Order flag on a new
order and that Trading Centers may choose not to avail themselves of
the exceptions even if the new order met the definition of a Retail
Investor Order.\47\ The commenters suggested that FINRA require the
identification of orders that rely on the Retail Investor Order
exceptions on execution reports rather than New Order Reports, Combined
Order/Route or Cancel/Replace reports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \45\ The Commission notes that it has granted FINRA an exemption
from Rule 608(c) related to this provision. See SEC Exemption
Letter, supra note 17.
    \46\ See FIF Letter I and Thomson Reuters Letter.
    \47\ See Thomson Reuters Letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In Partial Amendment No. 1, FINRA proposes to amend its proposed
rule to require the identification of Retail Investor Orders that rely
on the exceptions in Test Groups Two and Three on OATS execution
reports. FINRA noted that it understood that firms may not make the
ultimate decision of whether an exception will be relied upon until the
time of execution and therefore, it may be operationally more efficient
to reflect the Retail Investor Order flag on execution reports.
    The Commission finds that the amended FINRA rule requiring the
identification of Retail Investor Orders on OATS execution reports to
be consistent with the Act. The FINRA rule should implement the
requirement under Appendix B.II.(n) in a manner that should be more
efficient for Trading Centers.
    In addition, FINRA originally proposed to require its members to
record information in OATS related to an order or part of an order that
is executed on a venue that does not provide execution information to
FINRA. One commenter stated that it would be difficult and costly to
link orders to the OATS execution report process.\48\ The commenter
noted that it believed that the largest majority of ``away trades'' on
a U.S. venue that is not a FINRA member may be those executed on the
Chicago Stock Exchange (``CHX'') and recommended that FINRA work with
CHX so that an OATS-like execution report could be tied to OATS route
reports to collect the necessary data. In its response, FINRA noted
that it had reached an agreement with CHX to obtain data for executions
that occur on CHX and therefore, FINRA amended its proposed rule so
that members would not need to submit data related to executions that
occur on CHX.\49\ The Commission finds that FINRA's proposal is
consistent with the Act because it will provide FINRA with the data it
is required to collect under the Plan in a cost effective and efficient
manner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \48\ See FIF Letter I.
    \49\ See Partial Amendment No. 1. In Partial Amendment No. 1,
FINRA also proposes to remove the requirement that members provide
information about foreign executions. FINRA will obtain information
from OATS about orders routed to a foreign market. The Commission
believes that this proposal is consistent with the Act because it
would allow for analysis to be conducted on the impact of the Tick
Size Pilot on routing to foreign markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA's proposed rule contains several provisions related to the
Market Maker data required under the Plan.\50\ Specifically, FINRA
proposes under FINRA Rule 6191(b)(3) to collect from its members that
are Market Makers and for which FINRA is the DEA, the Daily Market
Marker Participation Statistics, required under Appendix B.IV to the
Plan.\51\ FINRA proposes to collect data related to activity conducted
on any Trading Center in furtherance of its status as a Market Maker.
FINRA proposes to transmit the data it collects under this paragraph to
the Participants that operate Trading Centers on which the Market Maker
activity occurred. In addition, FINRA will transmit the data related to
activity conducted otherwise than on a national securities exchange to
the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \50\ One commenter requested confirmation that a firm that is
neither a Trading Center nor a Market Maker but becomes a Market
Maker in a Pilot Security during either the Pre-Pilot or Pilot
Period would not have to retroactively provide data. See FIF Letter
I. FINRA, in response, clarified that there is no retroactive
reporting requirement for Trading Centers that become Market Makers
during the Pre-Pilot or Pilot Period, and that Market Makers only
need to report data on those days in with they are trading as a
Registered Market Maker. See FINRA Response.
    \51\ In its second comment letter, one commenter noted that
FINRA published new technical specifications for Market Maker
Transaction Reporting on January 11, 2016 and raised comments on the
technical specifications. See FIF Letter II. Specifically, the
commenter stated its belief that the new technical specifications
impact market makers' ability to meet the April 4, 2016 date for
transaction reporting. The commenter noted that identifying the
execution venue would add complexity that impacts market makers to
meet the April 4, 2016 date, and suggests that the identification
should not be required in certain situations. The commenter also
noted that correcting mismatched records would be resource intensive
and requested a grace period for compliance. Finally, the commenter
raised concerns with respect to how riskless principal trades are
reported, and offered suggestions on alternate reporting methods.
With respect to the execution venue and mismatched trades, FINRA
responded that the updated Market Maker Transaction Reporting
specifications would allow FINRA to determine the ultimate execution
venue for each trade, even if the Market Makers do not know such
venue. FINRA would use identifiers to link Market Markers trades to
the final destination where the trade was executed, using exchange
data and OATS data reported to FINRA. Correcting mismatched records
would allow the linkage process to result in complete and accurate
Market Maker participation statistics. FINRA further stated that it
would work with the Commission and the other Participants to
evaluate the mismatched records issue and make any determination as
to whether such correction continues to be necessary. With respect
to riskless principal trades reporting, FINRA responded that such
trades must be eliminated from the Market Maker participation
statistics, in order to evaluate the Plan. FINRA noted that it has
attempted to provide industry participants with as much advance
notice as possible to comply with the proposed requirements and that
it will continue to work with members to ensure that they have the
information and clarity needed to implement the new reporting
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission notes that the FINRA proposal expands upon the data
required under Appendix B.IV to the Plan. Appendix B.IV to the Plan
only requires FINRA to collect data from Market Makers who register
with its ADF. As provided, Appendix B.IV to the Plan would not allow a
complete evaluation of Market Maker participation in Pilot Securities.
The Commission believes that the FINRA proposal should enhance the
ability of the Commission and the public to assess the impact of the
Tick Size Pilot on Market Maker participation. The increased coverage
of Market Maker

data should provide greater insight on Market Maker participation under
the Tick Size Pilot by including Market Maker participation in the
over-the-counter market.
    One commenter raised concerns about the data collected by FINRA
under Rule 6191(b)(3)(B) and provided to each Participant where the
Market Maker activity occurred.\52\ The commenter requested that each
Participant provide clear assurances that the data provided to them
under the Tick Size Pilot would not be used for commercial or
competitive purposes. In its response, FINRA stated that it does not
intend to use the data collected under the Tick Size Pilot for
commercial or competitive purposes.\53\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \52\ See FIF Letter I.
    \53\ See FINRA Response.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its letter, FIF also raised concerns about Tick Size Pilot data
being published and that because some Pilot Securities could trade
infrequently that the data, even if unattributed may be reverse-
engineered to identify counter-parties.\54\ In its response, FINRA
noted that the Plan sets forth the publication requirements of
Participants. However, FINRA noted that it appreciates members
confidentiality concerns and intends to work to ensure that the Tick
Size Pilot data is made available consistent with the requirements of
the Plan.\55\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \54\ See FIF Letter I.
    \55\ See FINRA Response.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission notes that the Plan provides for the public
dissemination of Tick Size Pilot data but states that ``[t]he data made
publicly available shall not identify the trading center that generated
the data.'' \56\ The Commission also notes that Participants are
scheduled to start collecting data on April 4, 2016, but the
Participants have requested not to make the data publicly available
until August 30, 2016.\57\ The Commission notes that this could give
Participants the opportunity to evaluate the data to determine whether
the FIF's concerns related to the disclosure of the identity of Trading
Centers exist, and if so, whether additional measures are necessary to
prevent the disclosure of attributed Trading Center data. The
Commission finds that proposed Rule 6191(b) is consistent with the Act
because it implements provisions of the Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \56\ This requirement is contained in Section VII.A of the Plan.
See Approval Order, 80 FR at 27551, supra note 3.
    \57\ See Exemption Request, supra note 17. The Commission notes
that it has granted FINRA an exemption from Rule 608(c) of
Regulation NMS related to this provision. See SEC Exemption Letter,
supra note 17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA's proposed Rule 6191(b)(4) contains the provisions by which
FINRA will collect, submit to the Commission, and make publically
available Market Maker Profitability data required under Appendix C of
the Plan. The Commission finds that these provisions are consistent
with the Act because they implement provisions of the Plan.
    FINRA also proposes Rule 6191(b)(5), which contains provisions
whereby FINRA will collect data and calculate the Market Maker
Participation Statistics and Market Maker Profitability Data. Under
proposed Rule 6191(b)(5), FINRA members that are Market Makers and for
which FINRA is the DEA shall submit certain data elements, which FINRA
will use to calculate Market Maker Participation Statistics and Market
Maker Profitability. The Commission finds that this proposal is
consistent with the Act because it implements provisions of the Plan.
Further, this provision should lessen costs for FINRA members as FINRA
will conduct the necessary calculations. Finally, the proposal should
also enhance the usefulness of the data by making the calculations
consistent across FINRA members.
    Further, in proposed Supplementary Material .11, FINRA proposes to
specify how it will calculate raw Marker Maker realized trading profits
as required under Appendix C.I.(b) under the Plan. Under the Appendix
C.I.(b), the share prices used to calculate raw Market Maker realized
trading profits is determined using a LIFO-like method. FINRA proposes
to use a methodology that yields LIFO-like results, rather than
utilizing a LIFO-like method for purposes of the calculation.
    In addition, FINRA proposes to calculate the unrealized trading
profits of Market Makers as required under Appendix C.I.(c). Appendix
C.I.(c) provides that ``[r]aw Market Maker unrealized trading profits--
the difference between the purchase or sale price of the end-of-day
inventory position of the Market Maker and the Closing Price. In the
case of a short position, the Closing Price for the sale will be
subtracted. In the case of a long position, the purchase price will be
subtracted from the Closing Price'' which is to be provided as a
separate data element. FINRA proposes to calculate daily Market Maker
unrealized profitability statistics for each trading day on an average
basis. Specifically, FINRA proposes to calculate the volume-weighted
average price of the excess (deficit) of buy volume over sell volume
for the current trading day using reported trade prices. Further, the
gain (loss) of the excess (deficit) of buy volume over sell volume
shall be determined by using the volume weighted average price compared
to the closing price of the security as reported by the primary listing
exchange. FINRA shall report the number of excess (deficit) shares held
by the Market Maker, the volume weighted average price of that excess
(deficit) and the closing price of the security as reported by the
primary listing exchange.
    The Commission believes that proposed Supplementary Material .11 is
consistent with the Act because the proposed calculations will provide
measurable data that is consistent with what was originally sought to
be captured under the Plan. Therefore, the proposal will continue to
allow analysis of the impact of the Tick Size Pilot on Market Maker
Profitability. The Commission also believes that the proposed
calculation will also reduce implementation costs for market
participants because FINRA will conduct the calculations for its
members.\58\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \58\ The Commission notes that it has granted FINRA an exemption
from Rule 608(c) related to this provision. See SEC Exemption
Letter, supra note 17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA proposes several provisions that would, among other things,
specify to FINRA members how to report Plan data. Specifically, FINRA
proposes in Supplementary Material .02 to clarify how a Trading Center
will report Retail Investor Orders under Appendix B.II.(n).
Specifically, FINRA proposes that only those orders that rely on the
Retail Investor Order exceptions in Test Group Two or Three would be
identified with ``Y,'' all other orders would be identified with a
``N.'' The Commission notes that commenters supported the FINRA
clarification but, as discussed above, requested further clarification
as to which OATS report the Retail Investor Order flag should be added.
The Commission believes that this proposal, as modified by Partial
Amendment No. 1, is consistent with the Act as it clarifies existing
Plan language in a way that maintains the usefulness of the data while
also reducing implementation costs.\59\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \59\ The Commission notes that it has granted FINRA an exemption
from Rule 608(c) related to this provision. See SEC Exemption
Letter, supra note 17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA proposes to report certain data elements based upon modified
time fields. Specifically, under Appendix B.Ia.(14) and B.I.a.(15), the
number of cumulative shares of orders executed is required to be
reported based upon a set time frame after the time of order receipt.
Under Appendix B.I.a(21) and

B.I.a(22), the number of cumulative shares of orders canceled is
required to be reported based upon a set time frame after the time of
order receipt. The proposed rules would add finer increments to the
Plan reporting requirements and isolate microsecond and millisecond
reporting requirements into separate data elements. According to the
Participants, not all Participants or non-Participant Trading Centers
currently capture or report all orders and trades in either
microseconds or milliseconds.\60\ One commenter noted that OATS formats
do not allow for reporting in microseconds.\61\ FINRA responded that a
member is not required to report in an increment of time that is not
accepted or permitted by FINRA systems--if a member maintains its
internal timestamps in microseconds, the member would not be required
to report to OATS in microseconds because OATS currently does not
support microseconds. The Commission notes that the proposal merely
shifts the time reporting elements into separate reporting lines to
accommodate different reporting capabilities. The data reported under
FINRA's rules and the clarification from FINRA are consistent with the
intent of the Plan. Accordingly, the Commission finds that the proposal
is consistent with the Act.\62\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \60\ See Exemption Request, supra note 17.
    \61\ See FIF Letter I.
    \62\ The Commission notes that it has granted FINRA an exemption
from Rule 608(c) related to this provision. See SEC Exemption
Letter, supra note 17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under Appendix B.I.a(31)-(33), certain data elements are calculated
based upon prices measured at the time of order execution. FINRA
proposes to measure prices based upon the time of order receipt.
According to the Participants, the time of order receipt is more
consistent with the goal of observing the effect to the Tick Size Pilot
on liquidity.\63\ The Commission finds that the proposal is consistent
with the Act because it should make the data more useful for measuring
the impact of the Tick Size Pilot. Further, the Commission notes that
the time of order receipt is used in other current rules, which should
lessen implementation burdens for gathering these data elements.\64\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \63\ See Exemption Request, supra note 17.
    \64\ See e.g. Rule 605 of Regulation NMS. The Commission notes
that it has granted FINRA an exemption from Rule 608(c) related to
this provision. See SEC Exemption Letter, supra note 17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA also proposes to require that Trading Centers that display on
the ADF to report under Appendix B.I.a.(33) and that only those Trading
Centers that display in their own name shall be subject to this
section. The Commission believes that these additional requirements are
consistent with the Act. The provisions should make the Tick Size Pilot
data more complete by including additional Trading Centers' data under
this reporting requirement.
    FINRA proposes several provisions that clarify current reporting
obligations. For example, FINRA proposes that certain order types be
separately reported in discrete data lines, such as not held orders,
auction orders, and clean cross orders.\65\ The Commission notes that
these orders are currently included under Appendix B to the Plan. The
FINRA proposal clarifies how these orders would be identified for
reporting purposes, which should facilitate reporting and provide for
better analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \65\ One commenter requested confirmation that no additional
input would be required for Trading Centers beyond what was
specified in the OATS specifications published on October 12, 2015
and that FINRA would be responsible for determining the order types
based on the trade details provided by Trading Centers in their OATS
reports. See FIF Letter I. FINRA responded by clarifying that
members that operate Trading Centers would not be required to
provide additional data to complete these fields beyond what has
already be required in the OATS Reporting Technical Specifications.
See FINRA Response.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, FINRA proposes that a field be attached to signify whether
an order to be executed has been affected by LULD bands.\66\ In
addition, FINRA proposes, for purposes of Appendix B.I, to classify all
orders in Pilot and Pre-Pilot Securities that may trade in a foreign
market as fully executed domestically or fully or partially executed on
a foreign market. Finally, FINRA proposes, for purposes of Appendix
B.II, to classify all orders in Pilot and Pre-Pilot Securities that may
trade in a foreign market as directed to a domestic venue for
execution; may only be directed to a foreign venue for execution; or
fully or partially directed to a foreign venue at the discretion of the
member. The Commission finds that these additional discrete data
reporting elements are consistent with the Act. They should further
clarify the Tick Size Pilot data elements and provide guidance to
reporting Trading Centers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \66\ In its letter, FIF requested clarification that FINRA would
provide this data element. See FIF Letter I. FINRA responded that no
additional reporting will be required by members that operate
Trading Centers to populate this field beyond what has already been
set forth in OATS Reporting and Technical Specifications. See FINRA
Response.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under proposed Supplementary Material .09, FINRA proposes to
clarify that for purposes of Appendix B to the Plan, certain members
shall not be considered Trading Centers. Specifically, members that
execute orders over-the-counter for the purpose of correcting bona fide
errors of customer orders, purchase securities from customers at a
nominal price solely for the purposes of liquidating customers'
positions or completing a fractional share portion of an order, would
not be considered a Trading Center for purposes of Appendix B of the
Plan. One commenter noted that this proposal provides a better
understanding of the type of activity that would deem a firm to be a
Trading Center and agreed with the criteria proposed.\67\ The
Commission finds that this proposal is consistent with the Act as it
further clarifies what is required under the Plan. As noted in the
Approval Order, the data requirements are reasonably designed to
provide measurable data that should facilitate the ability of the
Commission, the public, and market participants to review and analyze
the effect of tick size on the trading, liquidity, and market quality
of Pilot Securities.\68\ The Commission believes that it is appropriate
to exclude such discrete trading activities identified in proposed
Supplementary Material .09 without harming the usefulness of the data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \67\ See FIF Letter I.
    \68\ See Approval Order, supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA proposes to identify Pre-Pilot Data Collection Securities for
purposes of the data collection requirements under the Plan that are
required to begin six months before the Pilot Period.\69\ The data
collection requirements are scheduled to begin on April 4, 2016.\70\
However, according to Section V of the Plan, the identification of
Pilot Securities will occur during the six-

month Pre-Pilot Period. FINRA has proposed to identify a wider universe
of securities for which data will be collected during the Pre-Pilot
Period so that once the Pilot Period begins, there should be a complete
data set for Pilot Securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \69\ One commenter requested information about how market
participants will obtain the list of impacted securities and other
details about Pre-Pilot Data Collection Securities and Pilot
Securities. See FIF Letter I. FINRA responded that it had published
detailed guidance on the format and content of the lists, including
the daily change lists. According the FINRA, this guidance includes
information on how firms may retrieve the lists in an automated
format. Further, FINRA noted that on February 10, 2016, FINRA and
the primary listing markets published a Tick Size Sample List that
may be used for testing until the actual Pre-Pilot Data Collection
Securities list is determined on March 4, 2016.
    \70\ One commenter suggested that there is insufficient time to
complete implementation of the data collection requirements. See FIF
Letters I and II. The Commission notes that FINRA issued data
collection specifications in October 2015 and January 2016 and
published FAQs for Trading Centers and Market Makers in October
2015. FINRA also noted that it is engaged in continuing discussions
with industry participants, including the commenter, on implementing
the data collection requirements and that it would continue to work
with members to ensure that they have the information and clarity
needed to implement the new reporting requirements. See FINRA
Response. Accordingly, the Commission believes that the current
implementation schedule is appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that the proposal to identify Pre-Pilot Data
Collection Securities for which Tick Size Pilot data will be collected
during the Pre-Pilot Period is consistent with the Act. The Commission
understands that it could be costly for Trading Centers to backfill the
data requirements to collect the Pre-Pilot Period data if Trading
Centers were forced to wait until the list of Pilot Securities is
developed as specified under the Plan. Therefore, FINRA's proposal to
establish a slightly broader universe of securities that likely would
be subject to the Tick Size Pilot is reasonable for purposes of
collecting data during the Pre-Pilot Period. The Commission believes
that the proposal should help to ensure that there is a complete data
set for Pilot Securities when the Pilot Period commences and should
help to reduce the cost and complexity of implementing the data
collection requirements.
    In proposed Supplementary Material .10, FINRA proposes to submit
data generated and collected under Appendices B and C of the Plan
within 30 days following the month end and to make certain data
publicly available on its Web site at the beginning of the Pilot
Period.\71\ In the Exemption Request, the Participants sought to
provide Pre-Pilot Period data under a revised schedule.\72\
Specifically, the Participants requested to provide the initial
submission of pre-Pilot Period data on August 30, 2016, which would
include data for the months of April, May, June and July. The
Participants requested this modified schedule in order to conduct
testing to ensure the accuracy of the data prior to the first
transmission to the Commission and publication of the data on their
respective Web sites.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \71\ The Commission notes that is has granted FINRA an exemption
from Rule 608(c) related to this provision. See SEC Exemption Letter
supra note 17.
    \72\ See Exemption Request, supra note 17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that proposed Supplementary Material .10 is
consistent with the Act because it will permit FINRA to conduct testing
to ensure the accuracy of the data it collects before it is submitted
to the Commission and published on its Web site. The data gathered
during the Pre-Pilot Period is intended to provide a baseline for
analysis against the data collected during the Pilot Period. The
analysis on the impact of the Tick Size Pilot can only begin once the
Pilot Period begins. Therefore, the Commission believes that FINRA's
proposal is reasonable as the delay in submitting and publishing Pre-
Pilot Period data should not impact the assessment of the Tick Size
Pilot.
    Finally, in proposed Supplementary Material .13, FINRA specifies
that the rule should be in effect during a pilot period to coincide
with the Pilot Period.\73\ Accordingly, the rule would become effective
once the Pre-Pilot Period begins.\74\ The Commission believes that this
proposal is consistent with the Act because it reinforces and clarifies
important dates and obligations under the Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \73\ One commenter submitted specific questions related to the
implementation of the data collection rules. See FIF Letter I,
Appendix. FINRA stated in its response that it is engaged in a
continuing discussion with FIF and other industry participants with
respect to the issues raised in the appendix of FIF's comment
letter.
    \74\ See also proposed Supplementary Material .10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that FINRA's proposed rules to implement the
Tick Size Pilot data collection requirements are consistent with the
requirements of the Act. The proposal clarifies and implements the data
collection requirements set forth in the Plan.

V. Solicitation of Comments of Partial Amendment No. 1

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning Partial Amendment No. 1, including whether the
proposed rule change, as modified by Partial Amendment No. 1, is
consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the
following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-FINRA-2015-048 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2015-048. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2015-048 and should be
submitted on or before March 15, 2016.

VI. Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Partial Amendment No. 1

    The Commission finds good cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of
the Act, to approve the proposed rule change, as modified by Partial
Amendment No. 1, prior to the 30th day after the date of publication of
Partial Amendment No. 1 in the Federal Register. Partial Amendment No.
1 requires FINRA members to provide the Retail Investor Order flag in
OATS execution-related reports; deletes the requirement that FINRA
members report data for execution on venues that do not report to
FINRA; and changes the reference in proposed Supplementary Material .03
for securities that trade in both the U.S. and in a foreign market from
``dually-listed'' to ``securities that may trade in a foreign market.''
The Commission believes that these changes provide greater clarity on
the application of the proposal. Accordingly, the Commission finds good
cause for approving the proposed rule change, as modified by Partial
Amendment No. 1, on an accelerated basis, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)
of the Act.

VII. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act
\75\ that the

proposed rule change, as modified by Partial Amendment No.1 (SR-FINRA-
2015-048) be, and it hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \75\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \76\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\76\
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-03668 Filed 2-22-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 96 (Friday, May 17, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29199-29200]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11917]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

Avani International Group, Inc., Birch Mountain Resources Ltd.,
Capital Reserve Canada Ltd., Dynasty Gaming, Inc. (n/k/a Blue Zen
Memorial Parks, Inc.), IXI Mobile, Inc., Laureate Resources & Steel
Industries Inc., Millennium Energy Corp., Shannon International, Inc.,
and Welwind Energy International Corporation; Order of Suspension of
Trading

May 15, 2013.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Avani International Group, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended September 30, 2010.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Birch Mountain Resources Ltd. because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended December 31, 2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Capital Reserve Canada Ltd. because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended December 31, 2009.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Dynasty Gaming, Inc. (n/k/a Blue Zen Memorial Parks, Inc.) because it
has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended December 31,
2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
IXI Mobile, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since
the period ended June 30, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Laureate Resources & Steel Industries, Inc. because it has not filed
any periodic reports since the period ended August 31, 2009.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Millennium Energy Corp. because it has not filed any periodic reports
since the period ended September 30, 2009.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Shannon International, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended September 30, 2006.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Welwind Energy International Corp. because it has not filed any
periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2010.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered,
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that
trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended
for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on May 15,

2013, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 29, 2013.

    By the Commission.
Lynn M. Powalski,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-11917 Filed 5-15-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P