Production and consumption

Europe’s fuel ethanol sector was a slow starter. It took almost 10
years to grow production from 60 mio litres in 1993 to 525 in 2004. In
the following 2 years we saw a true explosion in production. In 2005 and
2006 there were double-digit growth levels of over 70%. However, it was
not a sustainable growth; in 2007 production increased by ‘only’
11%.

Compared to the U.S.A. and Brazil but also the biodiesel sector the EU
fuel alcohol sector is rather small. The U.S.A. nowadays produces every
month more than the EU has produced in 2007 in total. Moreover, the EU
biofuel market is still predominantly a biodiesel market (80%).

Global Ethanol Production for Fuel (2006)

The top 4 EU producers of ethanol are France, Germany, Spain and Poland.
The top 6 consumers are Germany, Sweden, France, Spain, Poland and the
UK. Overall consumption of fuel ethanol in 2007 is estimated between 2.5
and 2.7 bn litres whereas total production was around 1.77 bn litres.
The gap was filled by ethanol from, almost exclusively, Brazil (98% of
total imports originating from Brazil). Last year ethanol imports were
equal to 45% of EU production and over 30% of total consumption.

Website: European Bioethanol Fuel Association;
http://www.ebio.org/EUmarket.php


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 177 (Friday, September 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54700-54702]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21803]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC14-132-000.
    Applicants: Elkhorn Ridge Wind, LLC, Forward Windpower, LLC,
Jeffers Wind 20, LLC, Lookout Windpower, LLC, San Juan Mesa Wind
Project, LLC, Sleeping Bear, LLC, Wildorado Wind, LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization Under Section 203 of the
FPA and Request for Expedited Action of Elkhorn Ridge Wind, LLC, et.
al.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5083.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/14.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:
    Docket Numbers: EG14-92-000.
    Applicants: Origin Wind Energy, LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification of EG or FC of Origin Wind Energy,
LLC.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5183.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/14.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2870-004; ER10-2868-003; ER10-2853-003; ER10-
2856-003; ER10-2872-003; ER10-2860-004; ER10-2865-004.
    Applicants: TransCanada Power Marketing Ltd, TransCanada Hydro
Northeast Inc., TransCanada Maine Wind Development Inc., Ocean State
Power, Ocean State Power II,TC Ravenswood, LLC.
    Description: Amendment to July 27, 2014 Updated Market Power
Analysis for the Northeast Region of TransCanada Entities.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5093.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2443-002.
    Applicants: Carr Street Generating Station, L.P.
    Description: Tariff Amendment per 35.17(b): Carr Street MBR Tariff
to be effective 9/4/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/3/14.
    Accession Number: 20140903-5142.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/24/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2472-001.
    Applicants: Agera Energy LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment per 35.17(b): Amendment to 1 to be
effective 7/23/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/3/14.
    Accession Number: 20140903-5155.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/24/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2520-001.
    Applicants: NorthWestern Corporation.
    Description: Tariff Amendment per 35.17(b): Amendment of Pending
Tariff Filing--LGIP Appendices 1 and 2 to be effective 9/27/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5003.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2672-001.
    Applicants: EDF Energy Services, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment per 35.17(b): MBR Revised Tariff to
be effective 9/4/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/3/14.
    Accession Number: 20140903-5158.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/17/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2764-000.
    Applicants: Otter Tail Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Filing
of Certificate of Concurrence--TCEA to be effective 8/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/3/14.
    Accession Number: 20140903-5157.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/24/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2765-000.
    Applicants: Otter Tail Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Filing
of Certificate of Concurrence--OMA to be effective 8/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/3/14.
    Accession Number: 20140903-5159.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/24/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2766-000.
    Applicants: Otter Tail Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Filing
of Certificate of Concurrence--CMA to be effective 8/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/3/14.
    Accession Number: 20140903-5160.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/24/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2767-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): GIA &
Distribution Service Agreement for Windstream 6040 Project to be
effective 8/31/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5001.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2768-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): GIA and
Distribution Service Agreement with United States Air Force to be
effective 9/5/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5002.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2769-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii):
Distribution Service Agreement with Windhub Solar, LLC. to be effective
11/4/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5007.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2770-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii):
Substitute Original 2893 Steele Flats Wind Project, LLC GIA to be
effective 5/23/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5077.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2771-000.
    Applicants: Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company.
    Description: Request for Issuance of Expedited Waiver of New
Capacity Qualification ``Package'' Deadline for the Ninth Forward
Capacity Auction of Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5085.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2772-000.
    Applicants: PPL EnergyPlus, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Withdrawal per 35.15: Notice of Cancellation of
Addendum to Hourly Coordination Agreement to be effective 9/5/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5105.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2773-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Notice of Termination of Two Small Generator
Interconnection Agreements for Lincoln Solar Millennium Fund, LLC,
Service Agreement Nos. 248 and 259 of Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5118.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2774-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Notice of Termination of Small Generator
Interconnection Agreement for NNN Land and Energy, LLC, Service
Agreement No. 261 of Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5122.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2775-000.
    Applicants: The Dayton Power and Light Company.
    Description: Tariff Withdrawal per 35.15: FERC Rate Schedule No.
42, Village of Arcanum to be effective 12/31/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5175.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2776-000.
    Applicants: The Dayton Power and Light Company.
    Description: Tariff Withdrawal per 35.15: FERC Rate Schedule No.
49, Village of Eldorado to be effective 12/31/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5184.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2777-000.
    Applicants: The Dayton Power and Light Company.
    Description: Tariff Withdrawal per 35.15: FERC Rate Schedule No.
43, Village of Jackson Center to be effective 12/31/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5185.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2778-000.
    Applicants: The Dayton Power and Light Company.
    Description: Tariff Withdrawal per 35.15: FERC Rate Schedule No.
44,

Village of Lakeview to be effective 12/31/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5186.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2779-000.
    Applicants: The Dayton Power and Light Company.
    Description: Tariff Withdrawal per 35.15: FERC Rate Schedule No.
45, Village of Mendon to be effective 12/31/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5187.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2780-000.
    Applicants: The Dayton Power and Light Company.
    Description: Tariff Withdrawal per 35.15: FERC Rate Schedule No.
50, Village of Minster to be effective 12/31/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5188.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2781-000.
    Applicants: The Dayton Power and Light Company.
    Description: Tariff Withdrawal per 35.15: FERC Rate Schedule No.
46, Village of New Bremen to be effective 12/31/2014.
    Filed Date: 9/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140904-5191.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/14.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 4, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-21803 Filed 9-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 192 (Thursday, October 3, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52887-52888]
[FR Doc No: 2019-21526]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2019-N-1707]

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al.; Withdrawal of Approval of
Five Abbreviated New Drug Applications for Pemoline Products;
Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice
that appeared in the Federal Register of June 4, 2019. That notice,
withdrawing approval of five abbreviated new drug applications for
pemoline products, contained an incorrect website address for an
archived web page of a Postmarket Drug Safety Information for
Healthcare Professionals communication that FDA issued on October 24,
2005, stating its conclusion that the overall liver toxicity risk of
CYLERT (new drug applications 016832 and 017703) and generic pemoline
products outweighed the benefits of these products. This document
corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Lehrfeld, Center for Drug

Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6226, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-3137.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of June 4, 2019 (84
FR 25811), appearing on page 25811 in FR Doc. 2019-11519, the following
correction is made:
    On page 25811, in the last paragraph of the third column, the
website address, https://wayback.archiveit.org/7993/20171114124349/https://www.fda.gov/DrugsDrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyinformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm126461.htm,
is corrected to read https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171114124349/https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm126461.htm.

    Dated: September 27, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-21526 Filed 10-2-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5899-5901]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02356]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2017-0811; Product Identifier 2017-NM-068-AD; Amendment
39-19184; AD 2018-03-11]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, &
702) airplanes; Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes;
Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes; and Model CL-
600-2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) airplanes. This AD was prompted by
a report of rudder yoke components that had not been properly inspected
at the supplier. This AD requires replacement of the left and right
rudder yoke assemblies. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective March 19, 2018.

    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of March 19,
2018.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; Widebody Customer Response Center North
America toll-free telephone: 1-866-538-1247 or direct-dial telephone:
1-514-855-2999; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected];
internet: http://www.bombardier.com. You may view this referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW, Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2017-0811.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0811; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone:
800-647-5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aziz Ahmed, Airframe and Mechanical
Systems Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Bombardier, Inc.,
Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702) airplanes;
Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes; Model CL-600-
2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes; and Model CL-600-2E25
(Regional Jet Series 1000) airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on September 13, 2017 (82 FR 42955) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM
was prompted by a report of rudder yoke components that had not been
properly inspected at the supplier. The NPRM proposed to require
replacement of the left and right rudder yoke assemblies. We are
issuing this AD to prevent a cracked rudder yoke, which may affect
rudder function on the affected side and could result in difficulties
in maneuvering the airplane.
    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian AD CF-2017-10, dated February
27, 2017 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet
Series 700, 701, & 702) airplanes; Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet
Series 705) airplanes; Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900)
airplanes; and Model CL-600-2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) airplanes.
The MCAI states:

    Bombardier Aerospace has informed Transport Canada that a number
of rudder yoke components were received which had not been properly
inspected at the supplier. The rudder yoke supplier discovered that
the crack detection inspection was omitted following the
manufacturing of some components. A cracked rudder yoke may affect
rudder function on the affected side and could result in
difficulties in maneuvering the aeroplane.
    This [Canadian] AD was issued to mandate the replacement of the
left and right rudder yoke assemblies.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0811.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. We considered the comment received. The Air Line
Pilots Association, International supported the NPRM.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD as proposed except for minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Bombardier, Inc., has issued Service Bulletin 670BA-27-073, dated
November 23, 2016. This service information describes procedures for
replacement of the left and right rudder yoke assemblies. This service
information is reasonably available because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 48 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
              Action                      Labor cost             Parts cost           product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement of rudder yoke          51 work-hours x $85    Negligible...........          $4,335        $208,080
 assemblies.                         per hour = $4,335.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all available costs in our
cost estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in

air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air
commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because
it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes to
the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2018-03-11 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-19184; Docket No. FAA-
2017-0811; Product Identifier 2017-NM-068-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective March 19, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3) of this AD, certificated in any category.
    (1) Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series
700, 701, & 702) airplanes, serial number 10343.
    (2) Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series
705) airplanes and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900)
airplanes, serial numbers 15326 through 15370 inclusive.
    (3) Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-2E25 (Regional Jet Series
1000) airplanes, serial numbers 19041 and 19042.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27, Flight
controls.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report of rudder yoke components that
had not been properly inspected at the supplier. We are issuing this
AD to prevent a cracked rudder yoke, which may affect rudder
function on the affected side and could result in difficulties in
maneuvering the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Replacement of Left and Right Rudder Yoke Assemblies

    Within 6,600 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
replace the left and right rudder yoke assemblies, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
670BA-27-073, dated November 23, 2016.

(h) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the manager of the certification
office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or
Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If
approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature.

(i) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian AD CF-2017-10, dated February 27, 2017, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2017-0811.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Aziz Ahmed,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Mechanical Systems Section, FAA,
New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-27-073, dated November 23,
2016.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; Widebody Customer Response Center
North America toll-free telephone: 1-866-538-1247 or direct-dial
telephone: 1-514-855-2999; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected]; internet: http://www.bombardier.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 25, 2018.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-02356 Filed 2-9-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 64 (Wednesday, April 3, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13040-13041]
[FR Doc No: 2019-06482]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OLEM-2019-0158; FRL-9991-64-OLEM]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Renewal for EPA's WasteWise Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to
submit the information collection request (ICR) for EPA's WasteWise
Program (EPA ICR No. 1698.10, OMB Control No. 2050-0139) to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). Before doing so, the EPA is
soliciting public comments on specific aspects of the proposed
information collection as described below. This is a proposed extension
of the ICR, which is currently approved through June 30, 2019. An
Agency may not conduct, or sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 2, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OLEM-2019-0158, online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), by email to [email protected], or by mail to: EPA Docket
Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kent Foerster, Office of Resource
Conservation and Recovery (mail code 5306P), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the EPA is soliciting
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of
the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. The
EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval. At that time, the EPA will issue another Federal
Register notice to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the
opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB.
    Abstract: This is a renewal for reporting and recording keeping
requirements under EPA's WasteWise program. WasteWise is a voluntary
partnership with organizations to prevent and recycle multiple
materials from municipal solid wastes (e.g., paper, aluminum cans;
plastic and glass bottles; food wastes: etc.). Under this program,
participants agree to set waste reduction goals and take specified
actions to reduce multiple waste streams. In addition, under WasteWise,
EPA has issued specific material or sector-based challenges. Currently
these challenges focus on food recovery, electronics, and State related
waste and material management efforts. A separate Federal Green
Challenge targets the federal sector but is not part of this ICR.
Participants use a web-based online database system containing
integrated platforms with automated forms to register for
participation; set goals; and report their waste reduction achievements
on an annual basis.
    Form numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Business and other for-profit and
not-

for-profit organizations, as well as Federal/State/Local and Tribal
governments.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Voluntary (RCRA sections 1003
and 4001).
    Estimated number of respondents: During year 1 of this ICR it is
estimated that 2,119 respondents will enter data into the data
management system. This estimate is expected to grow to 2,329
respondents in year 3 of this ICR due to an increased enrollment by
participants.
    Frequency of response: Annual.
    Total estimated burden: During year 1 of this ICR it is estimated
that 147,348 hours respondents, 3,452 hours from EPA. By year 3, the
estimated respondent hours of 164,073 and 4,152 agency hours for a
total of 168,225 hours. Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: For year 1, $5,766,636.45 from extra-agency
participants and $436,427.30 from EPA, which includes $6,213,063.75
annualized labor costs and $0 annualized capital or O&M costs. For year
3, $5,552,371.20 for respondents and $471,827.30 in agency costs, with
annualized cost of $6,024,198.50.
    Changes in estimates: Annual burden hours and associated costs
shown in the ICR reflect changing participation rates throughout the
ICR time period, therefore any changes are documented in Supplemental
Statement.

    Dated: March 27, 2019.
Barnes Johnson,
Director, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery.
[FR Doc. 2019-06482 Filed 4-2-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 11, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70065-70066]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23977]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2016-0556; FRL-9953-62-Region 7]

Approval of Nebraska's Air Quality Implementation Plans

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to approve
the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of
Nebraska. This action will amend the SIP to include revisions to Title
129 of the Nebraska Air Quality Regulations, Chapter 4, ``Ambient Air
Quality Standards''; Chapter 19, ``Prevention of Significant
Deterioration of Air Quality''; and Chapter 22, ``Incinerators;
Emission Standards''. This amendment makes the state regulation
consistent with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for
particulate matter 10 micrometers or less (PM10), fine
particulate matter 25 micrometers or less (PM2.5), Sulfur
dioxide, Nitrogen dioxide, Carbon monoxide, Ozone, and Lead as of the
date of the state submittal. This action also makes formatting and
grammatical corrections to title 129, chapters 19 and 22.

DATES: Comments must be received by November 10, 2016

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2016-0556, to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Crable, Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard,
Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document proposes to take action on the
State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of
Nebraska. We have published a direct final rule approving the State's
SIP revision (s) in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this
Federal Register, because we view this as a noncontroversial action and
anticipate no relevant adverse comment. We have explained our reasons
for this action in the preamble to the direct final rule. If we receive
no adverse comment, we will not take further action on this proposed
rule. If we receive adverse comment, we

will withdraw the direct final rule and it will not take effect. We
would address all public comments in any subsequent final rule based on
this proposed rule. We do not intend to institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so
at this time. For further information, please see the information
provided in the ADDRESSES section of this document.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: September 27, 2016.
Mike Brincks,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2016-23977 Filed 10-7-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


NOTE SUBJECT: Consultation with Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality TO: File FROM: Stephen Hoffman DATE: 2/ 27/ 06 On September 9, 2005 I called Ms. Kelly Dixon of the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality to introduce her to EPA proposed rulemaking on the use of chat. Ms Dixon indicated that ODEQ had a long history of participating with EPA on studies to determine the contaminant problems caused by chat in the Tar Creek superfund site. Ms Kelly indicated that she was aware of chat sued in hot mix asphalt and suggested that I call the ODOT staff to further discuss highway specifications.

I contacted Ms Dixon approximately once a month to keep her aware of the rule's development. I shared an draft of the proposed rule with Ms Dixon in late January, 2006. ODEQ has been extremely helpful in providing information and suggested contacts.


State CCW Mine Placement Regulations and Policy 160 ** Revised DRAFT  do not cite or quote** August 2002 ° Location criteria ( applicable since 1978). Nothing mining related can be located within: < Areas identified as unsuitable < 1,000 feet of any navigable lake, pond, or flowage < 300 feet of a navigable river or stream < A floodplain < 1,000 feet of the right of way for State and federal highways, scenic easements and overlooks, State public parks, wild and scenic rivers, or a bike or hiking trail < Wetlands ° Reclamation plan, including: < A detailed map < Ongoing reclamation procedures during mining operations < Proposed final land use and relationship to surrounding land < Plans for long term maintenance of the mining site < If not returning affected area to its original state, an explanation of why not ° Monitoring plan, including: < Baseline monitoring data < Ongoing monitoring of wastes and ground water and surface water quality < If ground water quality is statistically significantly different from baseline or background, need to notify DNR and implement contingency plan. < DNR may require additional monitoring during the course of the permitted activity ° Performance bond or insurance required to cover operations, any remedial actions necessary while active, and final remediation. The bond is released upon issuance of a certificate of completion of reclamation for the entire mining site.

Additional Requirements When Disposing of Mining Waste10 ( to be incorporated into the mining, monitoring, and reclamation plans above) ° Additional location criteria. No disposal at a mine may occur within: < 1,200 feet of any public or private water supply well < An area likely to be mined in the future < 200 feet of the property line State CCW Mine Placement Regulations and Policy 161 ** Revised DRAFT  do not cite or quote** August 2002 < An area where there is a reasonable probability that the disposal will result in a violation of applicable surface water and ground water quality criteria and standards ° Ground water quality and quantity standards ( and design criteria to meet standards). ° Feasibility report, including waste characterization and analysis. ° Operation plan for disposal, closure, and long term care. Includes an economic analysis for site closing and long term care. ° Leachate management system required if disposal area is lined or has low permeability soils. Liner or soils must be compatible with the waste. ° May require monitoring of leachate and any physical features to assess the impact of the disposal on critical aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. ° Final slopes between 2 and 33%. ° Final cover to minimize infiltration. ° Closure in accordance with mining reclamation plan. ° Record keeping and reporting. ° Performance bond must additionally cover disposal specific closure costs and long term care for a period of 30 years. Application for early termination of the long term care may be submitted after 10 years of closure.

Finally, while the backfilling of active underground mines would not be regulated as a waste disposal activity, certain basic environmental protection mechanisms would still be applied. Specifically, the backfilling activity must comply with the State's ground water quality and drinking water standards and the storage, transportation and handling of the material must not result in violations of the regulations applicable to ground water, surface water and air quality protection. Use of such material for backfilling or as an additive to other backfill material would be reviewed as part of the comprehensive mine permitting and environmental impact statement process. Any material used for backfilling would also be subjected to waste characterization studies to assess its acceptability for use as backfill and determine any environmental concerns associated with the intended use. State CCW Mine Placement Regulations and Policy 162 ** Revised DRAFT  do not cite or quote** August 2002 References Wisconsin Regulations: NR 538 et seq.; NR 132 et seq.; NR 182 et seq.

Lawrence Lynch, Mining Team Leader, Bureau of Waste Management, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources ( personal communication, 10/ 24/ 01) State CCW Mine Placement Regulations and Policy 163 ** Revised DRAFT  do not cite or quote** August 2002 WYOMING: Coal Mines The Wyoming Department of Environmental Protection Land Quality Division ( LQD) has sole authority over mine disposal of CCW from a mine mouth power plant. Such activity is subject to the general waste provisions of the State mining regulations, which are substantively similar to the federal SMCRA regulations. The LQD is currently developing new regulations that address waste disposal at coal mines and will include specific provisions regarding CCW. The State's current policy is to require a modification to the mining permit for CCW placement. Under its current policy, LQD also requires waste characterization prior to placement.

The Wyoming Department of Environmental Protection Solid and Hazardous Waste Division ( SHWD) shares authority with LQD over mine disposal of CCW from a non mine mouth power plant. Such projects have not yet been pursued in Wyoming. According to Robert A. Doctor of SHWD, however, such activity would likely require a solid waste disposal permit. Wyoming's solid waste permit requirements are summarized in Regulation of Landfills and Surface Impoundments Managing Coal Combustion Waste in 26 States, December 14, 2000 and are not included in this summary. Mr. Doctor also noted that SHWD is currently working on a Solid Waste Beneficial Use Guideline that will include CCW. These guidelines most likely will not consider mine placement to be a beneficial use.

References Wyoming Statutes: WS § 35 11 103( d)( ii)( D); WS § 35 11 401 et seq.

Wyoming Regulations: WAC SWM CH. 1, § 1( e)( i); WAC LQD CHS. 1 to 20 Robert A. Doctor, Program Manager, Solid Waste Permitting, Solid and Hazardous Waste Division, Wyoming Department of Environmental Protection ( personal communication, 4/ 16/ 01)

Rick Chancellor, Land Quality Division, Wyoming Department of Environmental Protection ( personal communication, 4/ 27/ 01 and 6/ 15/ 01)

Paige Smith, Land Quality Division, Wyoming Department of Environmental Protection. Comments at IMCC Intergovernmental Forum on Mine Placement of Coal Combustion Wastes. May 15 16, 2001. St. Louis, Missouri. State CCW Mine Placement Regulations and Policy 164 ** Revised DRAFT  do not cite or quote** August 2002 WYOMING Regulatory Agency Oversight Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality: ° Land Quality Division ( LQD) ° Solid and Hazardous Waste Division ( SHWD)

Allowed Uses Mine placement Before Placement Distinction Between Beneficial Use and Disposal Wyoming does not currently distinguish between beneficial use and disposal. Placement of CCW from mine mouth power plants, however, is regulated by the LQD. Placement of CCW from non mine mouth power plants would be regulated by SHWD.

Site Characterization Substantively similar to federal SMCRA, no additional requirements.

Siting Restrictions Substantively similar to federal SMCRA, no additional requirements.

Reclamation Plan Substantively similar to federal SMCRA, no additional requirements.

Waste Characterization The LQD treats CCW as a waste material and requires tests to determine the proper method of disposal.

Waste Characteristic Limits None specified ( as per federal SMCRA)

Address Acid Base Balance/ Acid Mine Drainage Substantively similar to federal SMCRA, no additional requirements.

State Approval Required to Proceed Substantively similar to federal SMCRA, plus: Requires a modification of the mining permit, or issuance of a solid waste permit, depending on the location of the generating facility. A first time application ( i. e., a mine that did not have previous approval as opposed to a mine that wanted to revise a previous approval) would require a major permit modification.

Public Participation Substantively similar to federal SMCRA, no additional requirements. WYOMING State CCW Mine Placement Regulations and Policy 165 ** Revised DRAFT  do not cite or quote** August 2002 During Placement Ongoing Waste Characterization Not required ( as per federal SMCRA)

Ground water Monitoring Substantively similar to federal SMCRA, no additional requirements.

Performance Standards Substantively similar to federal SMCRA, no additional requirements.

Enforceable Limits Substantively similar to federal SMCRA, no additional requirements.

Corrective Action Substantively similar to federal SMCRA, no additional requirements.

Operational Requirements/ Placement Engineering Substantively similar to federal SMCRA, plus: Based on waste characterization data, LQD has imposed specific placement engineering requirements on a site by site b asis. For example, they have required certain CCW to be encapsulated while others have been placed in specific areas of the backfill out of contact with ground water and out of plant routing depth.

Closure/ Post Closure Care Ongoing Ground water Monitoring Substantively similar to federal SMCRA, no additional requirements.

Performance Bonding or Financial Assurance Substantively similar to federal SMCRA, no additional requirements.

Other Closure/ Post closure Requirements Substantively similar to federal SMCRA, no additional requirements.