[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 125 (Friday, June 28, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31121-31122]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13810]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2010-0046]

QPS Evaluation Services, Inc.: Grant of Expansion of Recognition

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this notice, OSHA announces its final decision to expand
the scope of recognition for QPS Evaluation Services, Inc., as a
Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL).

DATES: The expansion of the scope of recognition becomes effective on
June 28, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information regarding this notice is
available from the following sources:
    Press inquiries: Contact Mr. Frank Meilinger, Director, OSHA Office
of Communications, U.S. Department of Labor; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    General and technical information: Contact Mr. Kevin Robinson,
Director, Office of Technical Programs and Coordination Activities,
Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor; telephone:
(202) 693-2110; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>OSHA's web page includes
information about the NRTL Program (see http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/index.html).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Notice of Final Decision

    OSHA hereby gives notice of the expansion of the scope of
recognition of QPS Evaluation Services, Inc. (QPS), as a NRTL. QPS's
expansion covers the addition of two test standards to its scope of
recognition.
    OSHA recognition of a NRTL signifies that the organization meets
the requirements specified by 29 CFR 1910.7. Recognition is an
acknowledgment that the organization can perform independent safety
testing and certification of the specific products covered within its
scope of recognition and is not a delegation or grant of government
authority. As a result of recognition, employers may use products
properly approved by the NRTL to meet OSHA standards that require
testing and certification of the products.
    The agency processes applications by a NRTL for initial
recognition, or for expansion or renewal of this recognition, following
requirements in Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.7. This appendix requires
that the agency publish two notices in the Federal Register in
processing an application. In the first notice, OSHA announces the
application and provides a preliminary finding and, in the second
notice, the agency provides the final decision on the application.
These notices set forth the NRTL's scope of recognition or
modifications of that scope. OSHA maintains an informational web page
for each NRTL that details its scope of recognition. These pages are
available from the agency's website at http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/index.html.
    QPS submitted two applications, one dated January 16, 2017 (OSHA-
2010-0046-0010) and another dated June 23, 2017 (OSHA-2010-0046-0011),
to expand its recognition to include two additional test standards.
OSHA staff performed a detailed analysis of the application packet and
reviewed other pertinent information. OSHA did not perform any on-site
reviews in relation to this application.
    OSHA published the preliminary notice announcing QPS's expansion
application in the Federal Register on February 12, 2019 (84 FR 3547).
The agency requested comments by February 27, 2019, but it received no
comments in response to this notice. OSHA now is proceeding with this
final notice to grant expansion of QPS's scope of recognition.
    To obtain or review copies of all public documents pertaining to
QPS's application, go to http://www.regulations.gov or contact the
Docket Office, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Room N-3653,
Washington, DC 20210.

Docket No. OSHA-2010-0046 contains all materials in the record
concerning QPS's recognition.

II. Final Decision and Order

    OSHA staff examined QPS's expansion application, the capability to
meet the requirements of the test standards, and other pertinent
information. Based on a review of this evidence, OSHA finds that QPS
meets the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.7 for expansion of the
recognition, subject to the specified limitation and conditions listed.
OSHA, therefore, is proceeding with this final notice to grant QPS's
scope of recognition. OSHA limits the expansion of QPS's recognition to
testing and certification of products for demonstration of conformance
to the test standards listed, in Table 1.

 Table 1--List of Appropriate Test Standards for Inclusion in QPS's NRTL
                          Scope of Recognition
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Test standard                     Test standard title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
UL 471...............................  Standard for Commercial
                                        Refrigerators and Freezers.
UL 62368-1...........................  Standard for Audio/Video
                                        Information and Communication
                                        Technology Equipment--Part 1
                                        Safety Requirements.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OSHA's recognition of any NRTL for a particular test standard is
limited to equipment or materials for which OSHA standards require
third-party testing and certification before using them in the
workplace. Consequently, if a test standard also covers any products
for which OSHA does not require such testing and certification, a
NRTL's scope of recognition does not include these products.
    The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) may approve the
test standards listed above as American National Standards. However,
for convenience, the use of the designation of the standards-developing
organization for the standard as opposed to the ANSI designation may
occur. Under the NRTL Program's policy (see OSHA Instruction CPL 1-0.3,
Appendix C, paragraph XIV), any NRTL recognized for a particular test
standard may use either the proprietary version of the test standard or
the ANSI version of that standard. Contact ANSI to determine whether a
test standard is currently ANSI-approved.

A. Conditions

    In addition to those conditions already required by 29 CFR 1910.7,
QPS must abide by the following conditions of the recognition:
    1. QPS must inform OSHA as soon as possible, in writing, of any
change of ownership, facilities, or key personnel, and of any major
change in its operations as a NRTL, and provide details of the
change(s);
    2. QPS must meet all the terms of its recognition and comply with
all OSHA policies pertaining to this recognition; and
    3. QPS must continue to meet the requirements for recognition,
including all previously published conditions on QPS's scope of
recognition, in all areas for which it has recognition.
    Pursuant to the authority in 29 CFR 1910.7, OSHA hereby expands the
scope of recognition of QPS, subject to the limitation and conditions
specified above.

III. Authority and Signature

    Loren Sweatt, Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, authorized the preparation of this notice.
Accordingly, the agency is issuing this notice pursuant to 29 U.S.C.
657(g)(2), Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012 (77 FR 3912, Jan. 25,
2012), and 29 CFR 1910.7.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on June 20, 2019.
Loren Sweatt,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2019-13810 Filed 6-27-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register: May 29, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 104)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 30870-30873]
[DOCID:fr29my08-35]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 51

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0844, FRL-8572-2]
RIN 2060-AO39

Method 207--Pre-Survey Procedure for Corn Wet-Milling Facility
Emission Sources

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to add Method 207 to the test methods in
Appendix M of 40 CFR Part 51. Appendix M contains recommended test
methods that are provided for the States to use in their State
Implementation Plans. Therefore, this method may be used as an
alternative to existing test methods for measuring volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions. This pre-survey method was developed by the
corn wet-milling (CWM) industry specifically to measure VOC mass
emissions from processes within the CWM industry. It provides a
systematic approach to develop a specific list of target organic
compounds and the appropriate methods to measure those target compounds
during subsequent VOC emissions testing. After using the pre-survey
procedure, the tester will have sufficient information to design a
comprehensive testing program using Method 18 and other appropriate
methods to measure the mass of VOC emissions during the actual
emissions testing. This method is an alternative to existing test
methods and does not add any new reporting requirements to the
reporting requirements that already exist. While it is an alternative
method, it is the recommended method for measuring VOC mass emissions
from CWM facilities. In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this
Federal Register, we are adding Method 207 to the test methods in
Appendix M of 40 CFR Part 51 as a direct final rule without a prior
proposed rule. If we receive no adverse comment, we will not take
further action on this proposed rule.

DATES: Written comments must be received by June 30, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OAR-2007-0844, by mail to: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Mail
code: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Please include a total of two copies. Comments may also be submitted
electronically or through hand delivery/

courier by following the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section
of the direct final rule located in the rules section of this Federal
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gary McAlister, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air
Quality Assessment Division, Measurements Technology Group (E143-02),
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number: (919)
541-1062; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Why Is EPA Issuing This Proposed Rule?

    This document proposes to add Method 207 to the test methods in
Appendix M of 40 CFR Part 51. We have published a direct final rule
adding Method 207 to the test methods in Appendix M of 40 CFR Part 51
in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register
because we view this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no
adverse comment. We have explained our reasons for this action in the
preamble to the direct final rule.
    If we receive no adverse comment, we will not take further action
on this proposed rule. If we receive adverse comment, we will withdraw
the direct final rule, and it will not take effect. We would address
all public comments in any subsequent final rule based on this proposed
rule.
    We do not intend to institute a second comment period on this
action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
For further information, please see the information provided in the
ADDRESSES section of this document.

II. Does This Action Apply to Me?

    Method 207 affects/applies to the CWM industry and is used
specifically to measure VOC mass emissions from processes within the
CWM industry. Therefore, the categories and entities potentially
regulated by this action include the following:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Examples of regulated
           Category                 NAICS \a\             entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry......................  311221...........  Corn wet-milling.
State/local/tribal government.  924110...........  State, local, and
                                                    tribal air quality
                                                    management groups
                                                    that regulate corn
                                                    wet-milling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ North American Industry Classification System.

III. Statutory and Executive Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review

    This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order (EO) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and
is, therefore, not subject to review under the EO.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). It adds a test method to the
recommended methods in Appendix M of 40 CFR Part 51. This method is an
alternative to existing test methods and does not add any new reporting
requirements to the reporting requirements that already exist.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative
Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses,
small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.
    For purposes of assessing the impacts of this rule on small
entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business as defined
by the Small Business Administration's (SBA) regulations at 13 CFR
121.201; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of
a city, county, town, school district or special district with a
population of less than 50,000; or (3) a small organization that is any
not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated and
is not dominant in its field.
    After considering the economic impacts of this proposed rule on
small entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. In
determining whether a rule has a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, the impact of concern is any
significant adverse economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities, since the primary purpose of the regulatory flexibility
analyses is to identify and address regulatory alternatives ``which
minimize any significant economic impact of the rule on small
entities.'' 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. Thus, an agency may certify that a
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, or
otherwise has a positive economic effect on all of the small entities
subject to the rule. This action establishes voluntary alternative test
procedures for satisfying the requirements of EPA Method 18, Section 16
(pre-survey), which are used to determine the mass VOC emissions from
processes within the corn wet-milling industry, by specifying the
analytes for subsequent EPA Method 18 testing. This rule does not
impose any new requirements or create impacts on small entities.
Therefore, this action is not expected to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. We continue to be
interested in the potential impacts of the proposed rule on small
entities and welcome comments on issues related to such impacts.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, the
EPA generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-
benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal
mandates'' that may result in expenditures to State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year. Before promulgating an EPA rule for
which a written statement is needed, section 205 of the UMRA generally
requires the EPA to identify and consider a reasonable number of
regulatory alternatives and adopt the least costly, most cost-
effective, or least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives
of the rule. The provisions of section

205 do not apply when they are inconsistent with applicable law.
Moreover, section 205 allows EPA to adopt an alternative other than the
least costly, more cost-effective or least burdensome alternative if
the Administrator publishes with the final rule an explanation why that
alternative was not adopted. Before EPA establishes any regulatory
requirements that may significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, including tribal governments, it must have developed under
section 203 of the UMRA a small government agency plan. The plan must
provide for notifying potentially affected small governments, enabling
officials of affected small governments to have meaningful and timely
input in the development of EPA regulatory proposals with significant
Federal intergovernmental mandates, and informing, educating, and
advising small governments on compliance with the regulatory
requirements.
    This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. This rule imposes no enforceable
duty on any State, local or tribal governments or the private sector.
EPA has determined that this rule contains no regulatory requirements
that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This
action adds a new test method for measuring VOC air emissions to the
recommended methods in 40 CFR Part 51. Because this method is an
alternative method, its use is voluntary. It will not impose
requirements on State, local, or tribal governments. Thus, this action
is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.

E. Executive Order 13132--Federalism

    Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999), requires the EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
    This proposed rule does not have federalism implications. It will
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132. Because this method is an
alternative method, its use is voluntary. It will not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on State or local governments, nor
will it preempt State law. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply
to this rule. In the spirit of Executive Order 13132, and consistent
with EPA policy to promote communications between EPA and State and
local governments, EPA specifically solicits comment on this proposed
rule from State and local officials.

F. Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' This proposed rule does not
have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175. The
proposed action would add a test method that could be used as an
alternative to existing methods. It does not add any new requirements
and does not affect VOC emissions or air quality. Thus, Executive Order
13175 does not apply to this action.

G. Executive Order 13045--Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997)
as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern health or
safety risks, such that the analysis required under section 5-501 of
the Executive Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This
action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not
establish an environmental standard intended to mitigate health or
safety risks.

H. Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)) because it is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note), directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its
regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards
are technical standards (for example, materials specifications, test
methods, sampling procedures, and business practices) that are
developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA
requires Federal agencies like EPA to provide Congress, through OMB,
explanations when it decides not to use available and applicable
voluntary consensus standards.
    The rulemaking involves technical standards. Therefore, the Agency
conducted a search to identify potentially applicable voluntary
consensus standards. However, we identified no such standards, and none
were brought to our attention in comments. Therefore, EPA has decided
to propose Method 207 to measure mass VOC emissions from processes
within the corn wet-milling industry. This proposed method provides a
systematic approach to develop a specific list of target organic
compounds and the appropriate methods to measure those target compounds
during subsequent VOC emissions testing.
    EPA welcomes comments on this aspect of the proposed rulemaking
and, specifically, invites the public to identify potentially
applicable voluntary consensus standards and to explain why such
standards should be used in this regulation.

J. Executive Order 12898--Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes
Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
    EPA has determined that this proposed rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse

human health or environmental effects on minority or low-income
populations because it does not affect the level of protection provided
to human health or the environment. This action proposes adding a new
test method for measuring VOC air emissions to the recommended methods
in 40 CFR part 51. It does not change any existing rules that limit VOC
air emissions.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 51

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Volatile organic
compounds.

    Dated: May 21, 2008.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8-11879 Filed 5-28-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36433-36436]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13045]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-EPA-R09-OAR-2022-0480; FRL-9873-01-R9]

Air Plan Disapproval; California; Antelope Valley Air Quality
Management District and Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
disapprove revisions to the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management
District (AVAQMD) and the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District
(MDAQMD) portions of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP)
concerning rules submitted to address section 185 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA or the Act) with respect to the 1-hour ozone standard. We are
proposing action on these local rules that were submitted as equivalent
alternatives to a statutory section 185 program. We are taking comments
on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 18, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2022-0480 at https://www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at
Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio,
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written
comment is considered the official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary

submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public
comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and
general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. If you need assistance in a
language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities
who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donnique Sherman, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone:<PHONE_NUMBER> or by
email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rules did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of these rules?
    C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules?
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is the EPA evaluating these rules?
    B. Do these rules meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. What are the rule deficiencies?
    D. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve These Rules
    E. Proposed Action and Public Comment
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rules did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the rules proposed for disapproval with the dates
that they were adopted by the local agencies and submitted by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB).

                                            Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Local Agency                  Rule No.            Rule title             Amended        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AVAQMD................................             315  Federal Clean Air Act           10/18/11        12/14/11
                                                         Section 185 Penalty.
MDAQMD................................             315  Federal Clean Air Act           10/14/11        12/14/11
                                                         Section 185 Penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On June 14, 2012, the submittals for AVAQMD Rule 315 and MDAQMD
Rule 315 were deemed by operation of law to meet the completeness
criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal
EPA review.

B. Are there other versions of these rules?

    There are no previous versions of AVAQMD Rule 315 in the SIP,
although the AVAQMD adopted an earlier version of this rule on February
15, 2011, and CARB submitted it to us on April 22, 2011. We consider
this earlier submittal to have been superseded by the December 14, 2011
submittal. While we can act on only the most recently submitted
version, we have also reviewed materials provided with previous
submittals.
    There are no previous versions of MDAQMD Rule 315 in the SIP,
although the MDAQMD adopted an earlier version of this rule on February
28, 2011, and CARB submitted it to us on April 22, 2011. We consider
this earlier submittal to have been superseded by the December 14, 2011
submittal. While we can act on only the most recently submitted
version, we have also reviewed materials provided with previous
submittals.

C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules?

    Under sections 182(d)(3), (e), (f) and 185 of the Act, states with
ozone nonattainment areas classified as Severe or Extreme are required
to submit a SIP revision that requires major stationary sources of
volatile organic compounds (VOC) or oxides of nitrogen (NOX)
emissions in the area to pay a fee if the area fails to attain the
standard by the attainment date. The required SIP revision must provide
for annual payment of the fees, computed in accordance with CAA section
185(b).
    The purpose of AVAQMD Rule 315 and MDAQMD Rule 315 is to satisfy
the requirements of sections 182 and 185 of the Act by utilizing an
equivalency approach consistent with the principles of section 172(e)
of the Act. Under these rules, AVAQMD and MDAQMD will track, calculate,
analyze, and report on expenditures designed to result in VOC or
NOX reductions within the Districts, to implement an
alternative program that is not less stringent than a statutory CAA
section 185 fee program. The rules include calculation of the CAA
section 185 fee obligation, establishment of a CAA section 185
equivalency ``Tracking Account,'' an annual demonstration of
equivalency, reporting to CARB and the EPA, and a provision requiring
major sources to pay fees directly in the event the area fails to
establish equivalency. The ``Tracking Account'' would include funds
from qualified programs that are surplus to the 1-hour ozone SIP and
designed to result in direct reductions or facilitate future reductions
of VOC or NOX emissions, as approved by the EPA.

II. EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is the EPA evaluating these rules?

    SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not
interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section
110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in
nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions
reductions (see CAA section 193). The EPA is also evaluating these
rules for consistency with the statutory requirements of CAA section
185. Equivalent alternative programs designed to meet the CAA section
185 obligation for the 1-hour ozone national ambient air quality
standard (NAAQS) must be consistent with the principles of CAA section
172(e) and must be ``not less stringent'' than the statutory section
185 program.
    Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate
enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements
for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following:

    1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the
Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,''
57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992).
    2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies,
and Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook, revised January
11, 1990).
    3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook).

B. Do these rules meet the evaluation criteria?

    AVAQMD Rule 315 and MDAQMD Rule 315 implement a fee equivalency
approach consistent with the principles of CAA section 172(e).\1\ The
rules are

largely consistent with general CAA requirements regarding SIP
submissions. However, the EPA proposes to disapprove the rules because
they contain provisions that do not meet our evaluation criteria and
affect rule enforceability and stringency. These deficiencies are
summarized below and discussed further in the technical support
document (TSD) for these rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ We have previously set out the legal rationale for
equivalent alternative section 185 programs. See 76 FR 45212 (July
28, 2011), and 77 FR 1895 (January 12, 2012) and the accompanying
docket materials.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. What are the rule deficiencies?

    These provisions do not satisfy the requirements of section 110 and
part D of title I of the Act and prevent full approval of the SIP
submittal. We propose to disapprove the SIP revision based on the
following deficiencies:

    1. AVAQMD Rule 315 refers to the term ``Major Facility'' as
defined in ``District Rule 1301.'' The current SIP-approved Rule
1301 for AVAQMD does not contain a definition of ``Major Facility.''
    2. The Districts did not provide a justification for the method
chosen to calculate alternate baseline emissions for facilities with
emissions that are irregular, cyclical, or otherwise vary
significantly.
    3. The rules establish an area-wide equivalency ``Tracking
Account.'' This system requires the cooperation and coordination of
three districts: AVAQMD, MDAQMD, and the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD). Each rule requires the respective Air
Pollution Control Officer (APCO) to request an accounting from other
Districts, but there is no requirement for the APCO to provide their
accounting to the other Districts. The rules assume accounting
across the three Districts with the same system in place. SCAQMD
does not have a rule that contains the same provisions. As a result,
the area-wide accounting system is not enforceable.
    4. The formula for calculating the penalty fee needs correcting
to properly reflect the inflation adjustment based on the Consumer
Price Index.

    The TSD for AVAQMD Rule 315 and MDAQMD Rule 315 contains further
discussion and analysis of these deficiencies.

D. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve These Rules

    The TSD describes additional rule revisions that we recommend for
the next time the Districts modify these rules.

E. Proposed Action and Public Comment

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, we are proposing
full disapproval of submitted AVAQMD Rule 315 and MDAQMD Rule 315. If
we finalize this disapproval, the final disapproval action would
trigger sanctions under CAA section 179(a)(2) and 40 CFR 52.31 unless
the EPA approves subsequent SIP revisions that correct the rule
deficiencies within 18 months of the effective date of the final
action. In addition to the sanctions, CAA section 110(c)(1) provides
that the EPA must promulgate a federal implementation plan (FIP)
addressing any disapproved elements of the plan within two years after
the effective date of the disapproval unless the State submits, and the
EPA approves, the required SIP submittal. As a result of the EPA's
January 5, 2010 determination that California had failed to submit the
required CAA section 185 fee programs for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS for
certain nonattainment areas (75 FR 232), the EPA is already subject to
a statutory deadline to promulgate a FIP for this purpose.
    We will accept comments from the public on the proposed disapproval
for the next 30 days.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Additional information about these statutes and Executive orders
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA, because this proposed SIP disapproval, if finalized, will not
in-and-of itself create any new information collection burdens, but
will simply disapprove certain state requirements for inclusion in the
SIP.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This
proposed SIP disapproval, if finalized, will not in-and-of itself
create any new requirements but will simply disapprove certain state
requirements for inclusion in the SIP.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. This action proposes to disapprove pre-existing
requirements under state or local law, and imposes no new requirements.
Accordingly, no additional costs to state, local, or tribal
governments, or to the private sector, result from this action.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175, because the SIP revision that the EPA is
proposing to disapprove would not apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated
that a tribe has jurisdiction, and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. Thus, Executive
Order 13175 does not apply to this action.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because this proposed SIP disapproval, if
finalized, will not in-and-of itself create any new regulations, but
will simply disapprove certain state requirements for inclusion in the
SIP.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs the EPA to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would
be inconsistent

with applicable law or otherwise impractical. The EPA believes that
this action is not subject to the requirements of section 12(d) of the
NTTAA because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Population

    The EPA lacks the discretionary authority to address environmental
justice in this rulemaking.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: June 12, 2022.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2022-13045 Filed 6-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 67 (Thursday, April 7, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20219-20222]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07576]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2016 / Rules
and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2015-0075; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-202-AD;
Amendment 39-18461; AD 2016-07-16]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013-26-08 for
certain The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and
-900ER series airplanes. AD 2013-26-08 required inspecting the
orientation of both sides of the coil cord connector keyways of the
number 2 windows on the flight deck; re-clocking the connector keyways,
if necessary; and replacing the coil cord assemblies on both number 2
windows on the flight deck. This new AD adds airplanes to the
applicability. AD 2013-26-08 resulted from reports of arcing and smoke
at the left number 2 window in the flight deck. This AD was prompted by
a determination that additional airplanes are subject to the same
identified unsafe condition. We are issuing this AD to prevent arcing,
smoke, and fire in the flight deck, which could lead to injuries to or
incapacitation of the flightcrew.

DATES: This AD is effective May 12, 2016.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of February 10,
2014 (79 FR 545, January 6, 2014).

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221. This service information is also available on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2015-0075.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
0075; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Carreras, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2013-26-08, Amendment 39-17717 (79 FR 545,
January 6, 2014) (``AD 2013-26-08''). AD 2013-26-08 applied to certain
The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER
series airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on January
23, 2015 (80 FR 3527) (``the NPRM''). AD 2013-26-08 resulted from
reports of arcing and smoke at the left number 2 window in the flight
deck. The NPRM was prompted by a determination that additional
airplanes are subject to the same identified unsafe condition. The NPRM
proposed to continue to require inspecting the orientation of both
sides of the coil cord connector keyways of the number 2 windows on the
flight deck; re-clocking the connector keyways, if necessary; and
replacing the coil cord assemblies on both number 2 windows on the
flight deck. The NPRM also proposed to add airplanes to the
applicability. We are issuing this AD to prevent arcing, smoke, and
fire in the flight deck, which could lead to injuries to or
incapacitation of the flightcrew.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and
the FAA's response to each comment.

Support for the NPRM

    Boeing stated that it supports the NPRM as written.

Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment of the Proposed Actions

    Aviation Partners Boeing stated that the installation of winglets
per Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) ST00830SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/
Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/
184de9a71ec3fa5586257eae00707da6/$FILE/ST00830SE.pdf) does not affect
the accomplishment of the manufacturer's service instructions.
    We agree with the commenter that STC ST00830SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/
Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/
184de9a71ec3fa5586257eae00707da6/$FILE/ST00830SE.pdf) does not affect
the accomplishment of the manufacturer's service instructions.
Therefore, the installation of STC ST00830SE does not affect the
ability to accomplish the actions required by this AD. We have not
changed this AD in this regard.

Comment Regarding Applicability

    United Airlines (UAL) stated that it found it curious that the
technical compliance mandated in AD 2013-26-08 was per Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24,
2013, whereas the airplane applicability in AD 2013-26-08 was based on
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 4,
dated November 3,

2011. UAL stated that, consequently, it anticipated further regulatory
action that would include the Group 3 airplanes specified in Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April
24, 2013, and has acted accordingly. UAL also stated that, since it was
already planning accomplishment on the Group 3 airplanes, the only
impact to it will be to change the AD number on the compliance
documentation. UAL stated that it has no further comments at this time.
    We acknowledge UAL's comment. No change to this AD is necessary.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD as proposed except for minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 718 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                                     Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of
              Action                      Labor cost         Parts cost       Cost per product       airplanes            Cost on U.S. operators
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keyway inspection and installation  6 work[dash]hours x            $1,608  $2,118...............             712  $1,508,016.
 (Group 1, Configuration 1           $85 per hour = $510.
 airplanes) [actions retained from
 AD 2013[dash]26[dash]08].
Adjustment of receptacles (Group    4 work-hours x $85                  0  340..................             410  139,400.
 1, Configuration 2, Group 2, and    per hour = $340.
 Group 3 airplanes) [actions
 retained from AD
 2013[dash]26[dash]08].
Coil cord inspection (Group 1,      1 work-hour x $85 per               0  85 per coil cord.....             404  34,340 per coil cord.
 Configuration 3, and Group 2        hour = $85 per coil
 airplanes) [actions retained from   cord.
 AD 2013[dash]26[dash]08].
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements
that would be required based on the results of the coil cord
inspection. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that
might need these replacements:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                         Labor cost                Parts cost           Cost per product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement........................  3 work-hours x $85 per hour  $1,735 per coil cord    $1,990 per coil cord
                                      = $255 per coil cord         assembly.               assembly.
                                      assembly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2013-26-08, Amendment 39-17717 (79 FR 545, January 6, 2014), and adding
the following new AD:

2016-07-16 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18461; Docket No. FAA-
2015-0075; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-202-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective May 12, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2013-26-08, Amendment 39-17717 (79 FR 545,
January 6, 2014) (``AD 2013-26-08'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -
700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes, certificated in any
category, as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 30, Ice and Rain
Protection.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of arcing and smoke at the left
number 2 window in the flight deck. We are issuing this AD to
prevent arcing, smoke, and fire in the flight deck, which could lead
to injuries to or incapacitation of the flightcrew.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Inspection and Replacement for Group 1, Configuration 1,
Airplanes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2013-26-08, with no changes. For airplanes identified as Group 1,
Configuration 1, in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-
30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013: Within 48 months after
February 10, 2014 (the effective date of AD 2013-26-08), do the
actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD.
    (1) Do a general visual inspection of the orientation of the
coil cord connector keyways on the captain's and first officer's
sides of the flight compartment, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013, except as
specified in paragraph (k) of this AD. If the orientation is not at
the specified position, before further flight, turn the receptacle
connector to the correct position, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013, except as
specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.
    (2) Replace the coil cords with new coil cords on both sides of
the flight deck, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision
5, dated April 24, 2013, except as specified in paragraph (k) of
this AD.

(h) Retained Receptacle Replacement for Group 1, Configuration 2, and
Group 2, Configuration 1, Airplanes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2013-26-08, with no changes. For airplanes identified as Group 1,
Configuration 2, and Group 2, Configuration 1, in Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24,
2013: Within 48 months after February 10, 2014 (the effective date
of AD 2013-26-08), install the receptacle connector with changed
keyway position on both sides of the flight deck, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013, except as
specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.

(i) Retained Coil Cord Inspection and Corrective Action

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD
2013-26-08, with no changes. For airplanes identified as Group 1,
Configuration 3, and Group 2, Configuration 2, in Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24,
2013: Within 48 months after February 10, 2014 (the effective date
of AD 2013-26-08), do a general visual inspection for rubbing damage
of the coil cord on the captain's and first officer's sides of the
flight compartment, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-
1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013, except as specified in
paragraph (k) of this AD. If any rubbing damage is found: Before
further flight, replace the coil cord with a new coil cord, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24,
2013, except as specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.

(j) New Requirements of This AD: Receptacle Replacement for Group 3
Airplanes

    For airplanes identified as Group 3 in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013:
Within 48 months after the effective date of this AD, install the
receptacle connector with changed keyway position on both sides of
the flight deck, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision
5, dated April 24, 2013, except as specified in paragraph (k) of
this AD.

(k) Exceptions to Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-
1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013

    (1) This paragraph restates the provisions of paragraph (j)(1)
of AD 2013-26-08, with no changes. In the circuit breaker tables of
the Work Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013, the panel number for
circuit breaker C00393 is incorrectly identified as ``P6-12.'' The
correct panel number reference for circuit breaker C00393, ``WINDOW
HEAT POWER RIGHT SIDE,'' is P6-11.
    (2) This paragraph restates the provisions of paragraph (j)(2)
of AD 2013-26-08, with no changes. In paragraph 3.B. of the Work
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-
1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013, the description for Part 3
of the Work Instructions is identified as ``PART 3: RECEPTACLE
CONNECTOR POSITION CHANGE,'' which is incorrect. The correct
description for Part 3 of the Work Instructions is ``PART 3: COIL
CORD INSPECTION AND REPLACEMENT IF DAMAGE IS FOUND.''
    (3) This paragraph restates the provisions of paragraph (j)(3)
of AD 2013-26-08, with no changes. In Figures 13 and 14, in
paragraph 3.B. of the Work Instructions of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013, the
note before the step tables misidentifies certain parts and airplane
groups. The note should read:

    Note:  Group 1 and Group 2 airplanes have the connector
receptacle identified as D10572. Group 3 airplanes have the
connector receptacle identified as D10560. Except for Group 1
airplanes, a wire diagram change is not necessary and not shown in
this service bulletin.

(l) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph restates the provisions of paragraph (k) of AD
2013-26-08, with no changes. This paragraph provides credit for the
replacement required by paragraph (g)(2) of this AD, if the
replacement was performed before February 10, 2014 (the effective
date of AD 2013-26-08), using the service information specified in
paragraph (l)(1), (l)(2), (l)(3), (l)(4), or (l)(5) of this AD,
provided that the actions required by paragraph (h) of this AD were
done as specified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-
30-1058, Revision 4, dated November 3, 2011; or Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24,
2013; for airplanes in Group 1, Configuration 2, and Group 2.
    (1) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, dated July 27, 2006,
which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
    (2) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 1, dated June
18, 2007, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
    (3) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 2, dated
February 13, 2009, which is not incorporated by reference in this
AD.
    (4) Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058,
Revision 3, dated July 7, 2010, which is not incorporated by
reference in this AD.
    (5) Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058,
Revision 4, dated November 3, 2011, which was previously
incorporated by reference on February 10, 2014 (79 FR 545, January
6, 2014).

(m) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if

requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance
with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or
local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (n)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) AMOCs approved for AD 2013-26-08, are approved as AMOCs for
the corresponding provisions of this AD.
    (4) For airplanes identified as Group 3 in Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24,
2013, AMOCs approved for the actions required by paragraph (h) of AD
2013-26-08, are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions
of paragraph (j) of this AD.

(n) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Frank Carreras,
Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (o)(4) and (o)(5) of this AD.

(o) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
February 10, 2014 (79 FR 545, January 6, 2014).
    (i) Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058,
Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (4) For Boeing service information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (5) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
    (6) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 24, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-07576 Filed 4-6-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: November 23, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 225)]
[Notices]
[Page 65724-65725]
[DOCID:fr23no07-60]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12940-000]

FFP Project 51, LLC; Notice of Application Accepted for Filing
and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

November 14, 2007.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric applications have been
filed with the Commission and are available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Preliminary Permit.
    b. Project No.: P-12940-000.
    c. Date Filed: August 6, 2007.
    d. Applicant: FFP Project 51 LLC.
    e. Name of the Project: Greenfield Bend Project.
    f. Location: The project would be located on the Mississippi River
in Mississippi County, Missouri and Alexander County, Illinois. The
project uses no dam or impoundment.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicants Contact: Mr. Dan Irvin, FFP Project 51, LLC, 69
Bridge Street, Manchester, MA 01944, phone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Patricia W. Gillis,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    j. Deadline for filing comments, protests, and motions to
intervene: 60 days from the issuance date of this notice.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Comments, protests, and
interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of
paper; see 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and, the instructions on the
Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission
strongly encourages electronic filings. Please include the project
number (P-12940-000) on any comments or motions filed.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person in the official service list for the
project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    k. Description of Project: The proposed project would consist of:
(1) 4100 proposed 20-kilowatt Free Flow generating units having a total
installed capacity of 82-megawatts, (2) a proposed transmission line,
and (3) appurtenant facilities. The project would have an average
annual generation of 359.16-gigawatt-hours and be sold to a local
utility.
    l. Location of Application: A copy of the application is available
for inspection and reproduction at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the

``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is

also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item h
above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Competing Preliminary Permit--Anyone desiring to file a
competing application for preliminary permit for a proposed project
must submit the competing application itself, or a notice of intent to
file such an application, to the Commission on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application (see 18 CFR 4.36).
Submission of a timely notice of intent allows an interested person to
file the competing preliminary permit application no later than 30 days
after the specified comment date for the particular application. A
competing preliminary permit application must conform with 18 CFR 4.30
and 4.36.
    o. Competing Development Application--Any qualified development
applicant desiring to file a competing development application must
submit to the Commission, on or before a specified comment date for the
particular application, either a competing development application or a
notice of intent to file such an application. Submission of a timely
notice of intent to file a development application allows an interested
person to file the competing application no later than 120 days after
the specified comment date for the particular application. A competing
license application must conform with 18 CFR 4.30 and 4.36.
    p. Notice of Intent--A notice of intent must specify the exact
name, business address, and telephone number of the prospective
applicant, and must include an unequivocal statement of intent to
submit, if such an application may be filed, either a preliminary
permit application or a development application (specify which type of
application). A notice of intent must be served on the applicant(s)
named in this public notice.
    q. Proposed Scope of Studies Under Permit--A preliminary permit, if
issued, does not authorize construction. The term of the proposed
preliminary permit would be 36 months. The work proposed under the
preliminary permit would include economic analysis, preparation of
preliminary engineering plans, and a study of environmental impacts.
Based on the results of these studies, the Applicant would decide
whether to proceed with the preparation of a development application to
construct and operate the project.
    r. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene--Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov

under the ``e-Filing'' link.
    s. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents--Any filings must
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``NOTICE OF INTENT
TO FILE COMPETING APPLICATION'', ``COMPETING APPLICATION'',
``PROTEST'', and ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as applicable, and the
Project Number of the particular application to which the filing
refers. Any of the above-named documents must be filed by providing the
original and the number of copies provided by the Commission's
regulations to: The Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. An additional copy must be
sent to Director, Division of Hydropower Administration and Compliance,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, at the above-mentioned address. A
copy of any notice of intent,

competing application or motion to intervene must also be served upon
each representative of the Applicant specified in the particular
application.
    t. Agency Comments--Federal, state, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-22828 Filed 11-21-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 168 (Thursday, August 29, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45511-45513]
[FR Doc No: 2019-18691]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2019-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1956]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Federal
Regulations. The LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will be finalized on the dates
listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS report in
effect prior to this determination for the listed communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has 90 days in
which to request through the community that the Deputy Associate
Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400

C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Chief executive officer of                                    Online location of letter of map                            Community
         State and county          Location and case No.             community               Community map repository                 revision                Date of modification       No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona:
    Maricopa.....................  City of Buckeye, (19-  The Honorable Jackie A. Meck,   Engineering Department, 530    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Nov. 22, 2019.........       040039
                                    09-0337P).             Mayor, City of Buckeye, 530     East Monroe Avenue, Buckeye,   advanceSearch.
                                                           East Monroe Avenue, Buckeye,    AZ 85326.
                                                           AZ 85326.
    Maricopa.....................  Town of Fountain       The Honorable Ginny Dickey,     Town Hall, 16705 East Avenue   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Nov. 29, 2019.........       040135
                                    Hills, (18-09-         Mayor, Town of Fountain         of The Fountains, Fountain     advanceSearch.
                                    2286P).                Hills, 16705 East Avenue of     Hills, AZ 85268.
                                                           The Fountains, Fountain
                                                           Hills, AZ 85268.
California:
    Riverside....................  Agua Caliente Band of  The Honorable Jeff L. Grubbe,   Tribal Administrative Office,  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Nov. 29, 2019.........       060763
                                    Cahuilla Indian        Chairman, Agua Caliente Band    Planning and Natural           advanceSearch.
                                    Reservation, (18-09-   of Cahuilla Indians, 5401       Resources, 5401 Dinah Shore
                                    1802P).                Dinah Shore Drive, Palm         Drive, Palm Springs, CA
                                                           Springs, CA 92264.              92264.
    Riverside....................  City of Cathedral      The Honorable Mark Carnevale,   Engineering Department, 68-    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Nov. 29, 2019.........       060704
                                    City, (18-09-1802P).   Mayor, City of Cathedral        700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero,     advanceSearch.
                                                           City, 68700 Avenida Lalo        Cathedral City, CA 92234.
                                                           Guerrero, Cathedral City, CA
                                                           92234.
    Riverside....................  City of Lake           The Honorable Steve Manos,      Engineering Division, 130      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Dec. 9, 2019..........       060636
                                    Elsinore, (19-09-      Mayor, City of Lake Elsinore,   South Main Street, Lake        advanceSearch.
                                    0548P).                130 South Main Street, Lake     Elsinore, CA 92530.
                                                           Elsinore, CA 92530.
    Riverside....................  City of Palm Springs,  The Honorable Robert Moon,      Public Works and Engineering   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Nov. 29, 2019.........       060257
                                    (18-09-1802P).         Mayor, City of Palm Springs,    Department, 3200 East          advanceSearch.
                                                           3200 East Tahquitz Canyon       Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm
                                                           Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262.    Springs, CA 92262.
    Riverside....................  City of Rancho         The Honorable Iris Smotrich,    City Hall, 69-825 Highway      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Nov. 29, 2019.........       060259
                                    Mirage, (18-09-        Mayor, City of Rancho Mirage,   111, Rancho Mirage, CA         advanceSearch.
                                    1802P).                69825 Highway 111, Rancho       92270.
                                                           Mirage, CA 92270.
    Riverside....................  City of Wildomar, (19- The Honorable Marsha Swanson,   City Hall, 23873 Clinton       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Dec. 9, 2019..........       060221
                                    09-0548P).             Mayor, City of Wildomar,        Keith Road, Suite 201,         advanceSearch.
                                                           23873 Clinton Keith Road,       Wildomar, CA 92595.
                                                           Suite 201, Wildomar, CA
                                                           92595.

    San Bernardino...............  City of San            The Honorable John Valdivia,    City Hall, 290 North D         https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Nov. 22, 2019.........       060281
                                    Bernardino, (18-09-    Mayor, City of San              Street, San Bernardino, CA     advanceSearch.
                                    1543P).                Bernardino, 290 North D         92401.
                                                           Street, San Bernardino, CA
                                                           92401.
    San Luis Obispo..............  City of San Luis       The Honorable Heidi Harmon,     City Hall, 990 Palm Street,    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Nov. 14, 2019.........       060310
                                    Obispo, (19-09-        Mayor, City of San Luis         San Luis Obispo, CA 93401.     advanceSearch.
                                    0399P).                Obispo, 990 Palm Street, San
                                                           Luis Obispo, CA 93401.
    Santa Clara..................  City of San Jose, (19- The Honorable Sam Liccardo,     Department of Public Works,    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Dec. 3, 2019..........       060349
                                    09-1253P).             Mayor, City of San Jose, 200    200 East Santa Clara Street    advanceSearch.
                                                           East Santa Clara Street, 18th   Tower, 5th Floor, San Jose,
                                                           Floor, San Jose, CA 95113.      CA 95113.
Hawaii: Honolulu.................  City and County of     The Honorable Kirk Caldwell,    Honolulu City and County       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Nov. 25, 2019.........       150001
                                    Honolulu, (18-09-      Mayor, City and County of       Department of Planning and     advanceSearch.
                                    2230P).                Honolulu, 530 South King        Permitting, 650 South King
                                                           Street, Room 306, Honolulu,     Street, Honolulu, HI 96813.
                                                           HI 96813.
Idaho:
    Ada..........................  City of Meridian, (19- The Honorable Tammy De Weerd,   Public Works Department, 660   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Nov. 22, 2019.........       160180
                                    10-0285P).             Mayor, City of Meridian,        East Water Tower Lane,         advanceSearch.
                                                           Meridian City Hall, 33 East     Meridian, ID 83642.
                                                           Broadway Avenue, Suite 300,
                                                           Meridian, ID 83642.
    Latah........................  Unincorporated Areas   Mr. Tom Lamar, Chairperson,     Latah County Courthouse, 522   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Dec. 5, 2019..........       160086
                                    of Latah County, (19-  Latah County Board of           South Adams Street, Moscow,    advanceSearch.
                                    10-0327P).             Commissioners, P.O. Box 8068,   ID 83843.
                                                           Moscow, ID 83843.
Minnesota: Dakota................  Unincorporated Areas   Mr. Thomas Egan, Chair,         Dakota County Administration   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Nov. 22, 2019.........       270101
                                    of Dakota County,      Physical Development            Center, 1590 Highway 55,       advanceSearch.
                                    (18-05-5246P).         Committee, Dakota County        Hastings, MN 55033.
                                                           Board of Commissioners,
                                                           Dakota County Administration
                                                           Center, 1590 Highway 55,
                                                           Hastings, MN 55033.
Nevada: Clark....................  City of North Las      The Honorable John J. Lee,      Public Works Department, 2200  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Nov. 25, 2019.........       320007
                                    Vegas, (19-09-         Mayor, City of North Las        Civic Center Drive, North      advanceSearch.
                                    0818P).                Vegas, 2250 Las Vegas           Las Vegas, NV 89030.
                                                           Boulevard North, North Las
                                                           Vegas, NV 89030.
New Mexico: San Juan.............  City of Farmington,    The Honorable Nate Duckett,     Public Works Department, 805   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Nov. 26, 2019.........       350067
                                    (18-06-3856P).         Mayor, City of Farmington,      Municipal Drive, Farmington,   advanceSearch.
                                                           800 Municipal Drive,            NM 87401.
                                                           Farmington, NM 87401.
Ohio:
    Tuscarawas...................  City of New            The Honorable Joel Day, Mayor,  City Hall, 150 East High       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Nov. 29, 2019.........       390545
                                    Philadelphia, (19-05-  City of New Philadelphia, 150   Avenue, New Philadelphia, OH   advanceSearch.
                                    1610P).                East High Avenue, New           44663.
                                                           Philadelphia, OH 44663.
    Tuscarawas...................  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Chris Abbuhl,     Tuscarawas County              https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Nov. 29, 2019.........       390782
                                    of Tuscarawas          County Commissioner             Administration Offices, 125    advanceSearch.
                                    County, (19-05-        Tuscarawas County County        East High Avenue, New
                                    1610P).                Administration Offices, 125     Philadelphia, OH 44663.
                                                           East High Avenue, New
                                                           Philadelphia, OH 44663.
Wisconsin: Ozaukee...............  City of Port           The Honorable Martin Becker,    City Hall, 100 West Grand      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Dec. 6, 2019..........       550316
                                    Washington, (18-05-    Mayor, City of Port             Avenue, Port Washington, WI    advanceSearch.
                                    6323P).                Washington, P.O. Box 307,       53074.
                                                           Port Washington, WI 53074.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2019-18691 Filed 8-28-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P