[Federal Register: July 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 130)]
[Notices]
[Page 39253-39254]
[DOCID:fr08jy10-85]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0492; FRL-9171-6]

Release of Second Draft Document Related to the Review of the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Availability of draft document for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On or about June 30, 2010, the Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards (OAQPS) of EPA is making available for public comment a
draft document: Policy Assessment for the Review of the Particulate
Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards--Second External Review
Draft. This draft document will serve to ``bridge the gap'' between the
scientific information and the judgments required of the Administrator
in determining whether it is appropriate to retain or revise the
standards as part of the review of the national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) for particulate matter (PM).

DATES: Comments should be submitted on or before August 16, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2007-0492, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail: Comments may be sent by electronic mail (e-mail)
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-
0492.
     Fax: Fax your comments to<PHONE_NUMBER>, Attention Docket
ID. No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0492.
     Mail: Send your comments to: Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, Attention Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0492.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to: EPA
Docket Center, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Room 3334, Washington, DC.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2007-0492. The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket

materials are available either electronically in http://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Docket in the EPA Docket
Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. This Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket telephone number
is<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions related to this draft
document, please contact Ms. Beth Hassett-Sipple, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards (Mail code C504-06), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; e-mail: hassett-
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

General Information

A. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of
the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk
or CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM
as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
     Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other
identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and
page number).
     Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
     Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives
and substitute language for your requested changes.
     Describe any assumptions and provide any technical
information and/or data that you used.
     If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
     Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
     Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 108(a) of the Clean Air Act
(CAA), the Administrator identifies and lists certain pollutants which
``cause or contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be
anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.'' The EPA then issues
air quality criteria for these listed pollutants, which are commonly
referred to as ``criteria pollutants.'' The air quality criteria are to
``accurately reflect the latest scientific knowledge useful in
indicating the kind and extent of all identifiable effects on public
health or welfare which may be expected from the presence of [a]
pollutant in the ambient air, in varying quantities.'' Under section
109 of the CAA, EPA establishes primary (health-based) and secondary
(welfare-based) NAAQS for pollutants for which air quality criteria are
issued. Section 109(d) of the CAA requires periodic review and, if
appropriate, revision of existing air quality criteria. The revised air
quality criteria reflect advances in scientific knowledge on the
effects of the pollutant on public health or welfare. The EPA is also
required to periodically review and revise the NAAQS, if appropriate,
based on the revised criteria.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/review.html for more
information on the NAAQS review process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Presently, EPA is reviewing the NAAQS for PM. The EPA's overall
plan and schedule for this review is presented in the Integrated Review
Plan for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate
Matter.\2\ A draft of the integrated review plan was released for
public review and comment in October 2007 and was the subject of a
consultation with the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC)
on November 30, 2007 (72 FR 63177; November 8, 2007). Comments received
from that consultation and from the public were considered in
finalizing the plan and in beginning the review of the air quality
criteria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ EPA 452R-08-004; March 2008; Available: http://www.epa.gov/
ttn/naaqs/standards/pm/s_pm_2007_pd.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As part of EPA's review of the primary (health-based) and secondary
(welfare-based) PM NAAQS, the Agency has completed the Integrated
Science Assessment for Particulate Matter \3\ and two quantitative
assessment documents characterizing: (1) The health risks associated
with exposure to ambient PM and (2) urban visibility impairment
associated with PM. The two assessment documents are titled,
Particulate Matter Urban-Focused Visibility Assessment and Quantitative
Health Risk Assessment for Particulate Matter.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ EPA 600/R-08/139F and EPA 600/R-08/139FA, December 2009;
Available: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/pm/s_pm_2007_
isa.html.
    \4\ EPA 452/R-10-004 and EPA 452/R-10-005, June 2010; Available:
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/pm/s_pm_2007_risk.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The second draft Policy Assessment announced today builds on the
scientific and technical information available in this review as
assessed in the Integrated Science Assessment and the two quantitative
assessment documents identified above. This document presents factors
relevant to EPA's review of the primary and secondary PM NAAQS. It
focuses on both evidence- and risk-based information in evaluating the
adequacy of the current PM NAAQS and identifying potential alternative
standards for consideration. The second draft Policy Assessment may be
accessed online on or about June 30, 2010, through EPA's TTN Web site
at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/pm/s_pm_2007_pa.html.
    The EPA is soliciting advice and recommendations from the CASAC by
means of a review of the second draft Policy Assessment at an upcoming
public meeting of the CASAC that will be held on July 26-27, 2010 (75
FR 32763; June 9, 2010). Following the CASAC meeting, EPA will consider
comments received from the CASAC and the public in preparing a final
Policy Assessment.
    The draft document described above does not represent and should
not be construed to represent any final EPA policy, viewpoint, or
determination.

    Dated: June 25, 2010.
Jennifer Noonan Edwards,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-16490 Filed 7-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 29 (Friday, February 11, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7694-7695]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3076]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0054; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-070-AD;
Amendment 39-16582; AD 2011-01-53]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A Model
PIAGGIO P-180 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting an airworthiness directive (AD) that
published in the Federal Register. That AD applies to the products
listed above. The Piaggio service bulletin number specified in the
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) section is incorrect. This
document corrects that error. In all other respects, the original
document remains the same.

DATES: This final rule is effective February 11, 2011. The effective
date for AD 2011-01-53 remains January 24, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Engineer, Small
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; phone:
(816) 329-4144; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Airworthiness Directive 2011-01-53,
amendment 39-16582 (76 FR 4056, January 24, 2011), currently requires
an immediate functional test of the fuselage drain holes, and requires
sending a report of the results to the FAA. The AD also allows, with
noted exceptions, for

the return/position of the airplane to a home base, hangar, maintenance
facility, etc. for PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A Model PIAGGIO P-180
airplanes.
    As published, the Piaggio service bulletin number specified in the
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) section is incorrect.
    No other part of the preamble or regulatory information has been
changed; therefore, only the changed portion of the final rule is being
published in the Federal Register.
    The effective date of AD 2011-01-53 remains January 24, 2011.

Correction of Regulatory Text

Sec.  39.13  [Corrected]

    In the Federal Register of January 24, 2011, on page 4058, in the
first column, paragraph (k)(2) of AD 2011-01-53, the Alternative
Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) section is corrected to read as follows:

    (2) Accomplishment of Piaggio Service Bulletin (ALERT) No. 80-
0324, dated December 20, 2010, in its entirety provides an
acceptable level of safety to the actions of this AD and thus is
considered an approved AMOC for AD 2011-01-53.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on February 7, 2011.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-3076 Filed 2-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 163 (Monday, August 24, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51152-51153]
[FR Doc No: 2015-20776]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2015-0408; EPA-R05-OAR-2015-0409; FRL-9932-62-Region 5]

Air Plan Approval; IL; MN; Determinations of Attainment of the
2008 Lead Standard for Chicago and Eagan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to make
determinations under the Clean Air Act (CAA) that the Chicago, Illinois
and Eagan, Minnesota nonattainment areas (hereafter also referred to,
respectively, as the ``Chicago area,'' ``Eagan area,'' or ``areas'')
have attained the 2008 lead (Pb) national ambient air quality standard
(NAAQS or standard). These determinations of attainment are based upon
complete, quality-assured, and certified ambient air monitoring data
for the 2012-2014 design period showing that the areas have achieved
attainment of the 2008 Pb NAAQS. Additionally, as a result of these
determinations, EPA proposes to suspend the requirements for the areas
to submit attainment demonstrations, and associated reasonably
available control measures (RACM), reasonable further progress (RFP)
plans, contingency measures for failure to meet RFP, and attainment
deadlines, for as long as the areas continue to attain the 2008 Pb
NAAQS. In this action EPA is not proposing a redesignation of the areas
to attainment of the 2008 Pb NAAQS; the areas remain designated
nonattainment until such

time as EPA determines that the areas meet the CAA requirements for
redesignation to attainment and takes action to redesignate the areas.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 23, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2015-0408 (Chicago area) or EPA-R05-OAR-2015-0409 (Eagan area), by
one of the following methods:
    1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    4. Mail: Douglas Aburano, Chief, Attainment Planning and
Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    5. Hand Delivery: Douglas Aburano, Chief, Attainment Planning and
Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office normal
hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The Regional Office official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
    Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules
section of this Federal Register for detailed instructions on how to
submit comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Svingen, Environmental Engineer,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is making an attainment determination as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no
further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the
direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received
will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed
rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For
additional information, see the direct final rule which is located in
the Rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: August 10, 2015.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2015-20776 Filed 8-21-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 27, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 52893]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20752]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2013-0446; FRL 9900-38-Region 7]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for the state of Iowa. The purpose of these
revisions is to update the Polk County Board of Health Rules and
Regulations. These proposed revisions reflect updates to the Iowa
statewide rules previously approved by EPA and will ensure consistency
between the applicable local agency rules and Federally-approved rules.

DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received in writing by
September 26, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2013-0446 by mail to: Michael Jay, Environmental Protection Agency,
Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa,
Kansas 66219. Comments may also be submitted electronically or through
hand delivery/courier by following the detailed instructions in the
ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule located in the rules section
of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Jay at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of the Federal
Register, EPA is approving the state's SIP revision as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial revision amendment and anticipates no relevant adverse
comments to this action. A detailed rationale for the approval is set
forth in the direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are
received in response to this action, no further activity is
contemplated in relation to this action. If EPA receives relevant
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed action. EPA will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this
action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives
adverse comment on part of this rule and if that part can be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those parts of
the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For additional
information, see the direct final rule which is located in the rules
section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: August 1, 2013.
Mark Hague,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2013-20752 Filed 8-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10502-10503]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4010]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14329-000]

Notice of Preliminary Permit Application Accepted for Filing and
Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Competing Applications;
Grand Coulee Project Hydroelectric Authority

    On December 1, 2011, the Grand Coulee Project Hydroelectric
Authority filed an application for a preliminary permit, pursuant to
section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act (FPA), proposing to study the
feasibility of the Banks Lake Pumped Storage Project (Banks Lake
Project or project) to be located on Banks Lake and Franklin D.
Roosevelt Lake (Roosevelt Lake), near the town of Grand Coulee, Douglas
and Grant Counties, Washington. The project would be located on federal
lands administered by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and
the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The sole purpose of a
preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant the permit holder priority
to file a license application during the permit term. A preliminary
permit does not authorize the permit holder to perform any land-
disturbing activities or otherwise enter

upon lands or waters owned by others without the owners' express
permission.
    The proposed project has two alternatives:

Alternative 1

    The proposed project would use Reclamation's existing Banks Lake as
the upper reservoir and Roosevelt Lake as the lower reservoir. The
proposed project would consist of the following new facilities: (1) An
upper reservoir inlet/outlet structure equipped with trash racks; (2) a
1.5-mile-long penstock consisting of a vertical shaft, power tunnel
segments, and a tailrace section, extending between the upper reservoir
inlet/outlet and the reversible turbine/generator units in the
powerhouse; (3) an underground powerhouse containing four reversible
turbine/generator units rated for 250 megawatts (MW) each, for a total
installed generation of 1,000 MW, or a powerhouse located on the shore
of Roosevelt Lake, also containing four 250-MW reversible turbine/
generator units; (4) a 2-mile-long, 500-kilovolt (kV) transmission line
extending from the project powerhouse to an existing 500-kV substation;
and (5) appurtenant facilities. The estimated annual generation of
Alternative 1 for the Banks Lake Project would be 2,263 gigawatt-hours
(GWh).

Alternative 2

    The proposed project would use Reclamation's existing Banks Lake as
the lower reservoir. The proposed project would consist of the
following new facilities: (1) A new 312-acre upper reservoir
constructed approximately 3,000 feet west of the existing Banks Lake,
impounded by three earth and rockfill embankments, each with a crest
elevation of 2,300 feet above mean sea level; (2) an upper reservoir
inlet/outlet structure equipped with trash racks; (2) a 620-foot-long,
43-foot-diameter vertical shaft connecting the upper reservoir inlet/
outlet structure to the power tunnels; (3) four 1,700-foot-long, 17-
foot-diameter power tunnels leading from the vertical shaft to the
powerhouse; (4) an underground powerhouse containing four reversible
turbine/generator units rated for 260 MW each, for a total installed
generation of 1,040 MW; (5) a 25-foot-diameter tailrace tunnel between
the powerhouse and the existing Banks Lake; (6) a 2.4-mile-long, 500-kV
transmission line extending from the project powerhouse to a new 500-kV
substation; and (7) appurtenant facilities. The estimated annual
generation of Alternative 2 for the Banks Lake Project would be 2,978
GWh.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Ronald K. Rodewald, Secretary-Manager, Grand
Coulee Project Hydroelectric Authority, P.O. Box 219, Ephrata, WA
98823; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Jennifer Harper; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and
competing applications may be filed electronically via the Internet.
See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's
Web site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail an original and seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-14329) in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: February 14, 2012.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-4010 Filed 2-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6670-6671]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02249]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2014-07]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to
improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of
FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the
inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to
affect the legal status of the petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before February 24, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by Docket Number FAA-2014-
0028 using any of the following methods:
     Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to the Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
     Fax: Fax comments to the Docket Management Facility at
202-493-2251.
     Hand Delivery: Bring comments to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Privacy: We will post all comments we receive, without change, to
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. Using the search function of our docket Web site, anyone can
find and read the comments received into any of our dockets, including
the name of the individual sending the comment (or signing the comment
for an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
    Docket: To read background documents or comments received, go to
http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alphonso Pendergrass<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 29, 2014.
Lirio Liu,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2014-0028
    Petitioner: Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, Inc. (``Gulfstream'')
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: Sec.  145.107(a)(1)
    Description of Relief Sought: Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation,
Inc. (``Gulfstream'') petitions the FAA for a permanent exemption from
14 CFR 145.107(a)(1) to allow Gulfstream to form a satellite repair
station

organization without the repair station with managerial control having
all of the same ratings as its satellite repair stations.

[FR Doc. 2014-02249 Filed 2-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


	ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

	40 CFR Part 52

	[EPA-R03-OAR-2009-0804; FRL-        ]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Delaware;
Amendment to Electric Generating Unit Multi-Pollutant Regulation

AGENCY:	Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION:	Final rule.

SUMMARY:  EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Delaware.  The revision is an amendment to the
Electric Generating Unit Multi-Pollutant Regulation of Delaware’s
Administrative Code, and it modifies the sulfur dioxide (SO2) mass
emissions limit associated with Conectiv Edge Moor Unit 5 beginning in
calendar year 2009.  This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act
(CAA or the Act).

EFFECTIVE DATE:  This final rule is effective on [insert date 30 days
from date of publication].

ADDRESSES:  EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2009-0804.  All documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov website.   Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.  Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and

by statute.  Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and

will be publicly available only in hard copy form.  Publicly available
docket materials are available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal are available at the
Delaware Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Control, 89
Kings Highway, P.O. Box 1401, Dover, Delaware 19901.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Irene Shandruk,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
e-mail at   HYPERLINK<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I.  Background

On January 5, 2010 (75 FR 2), EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of Delaware.  The NPR proposed approval
of Delaware’s SIP revision pertaining to Regulation No. 1146 –
Electric Generating Unit (EGU) Multi-Pollutant Regulation.  The
regulation was adopted in order to impose lower emissions limits of
nitrogen oxides (NOx) and SO2 in order to help Delaware attain and
maintain the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone
and fine particulate matter (PM2.5), as well as to assist Delaware in
achieving the emissions reductions needed to support the State’s
8-hour ozone reasonable further progress plan (RFP).  The formal SIP
revision was submitted by the Delaware Department of Natural Resources
and Environmental Control (DNREC) November 16, 2006.  No comments were
received on the NPR.

II.  Summary of SIP Revision

On October 7, 2009, EPA received a SIP revision to amend Regulation No.
1146.  This SIP revision was the result of a settlement agreement
between Conectiv Delmarva Generating, Inc. and DNREC in December 2008.
Conectiv had filed an appeal challenging the regulation for their Edge
Moor 5 facility.  The emissions limit of 2,427 tons per year limited the
facility from operating in extreme circumstances in the event that
failure at other production units would require them to exceed that
limit in order to supply the needed electricity.  The limit of 4,600
tons per year was determined to be an adequate limit after an analysis
of the facility’s history of operation and the estimate of future
operations using the low sulfur (0.5%) residual fuel to generate
electricity at the 446 megawatt oil-fired steam generating unit.
Currently, the facility operates at a 10% capacity factor.  If so
required, the new emissions limit would allow the facility to operate at
a 45% capacity factor.

The Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control
requested that a revision to the State’s SIP concerning amendment,
which modifies the SO2 mass emissions limit associated with Conectiv
Edge Moor Unit 5, be approved.

III.  Final Action

Delaware has met the requirements concerning an amendment to the
Electric Generating Unit Multi-Pollutant Regulation of Delaware’s
Administrative Code, which modifies the SO2 mass emissions limit
associated with Conectiv Edge Moor Unit 5.  The purpose of this revision
is to assist Delaware in achieving the emissions reductions needed to
support the State’s 8-hour ozone RFP, and therefore, EPA is approving
it.

IV.   Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A.   General Requirements

Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations.  42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).  Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.  Accordingly,
this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by
state law.  For that reason, this action:

is not a "significant regulatory action” subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993);

does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);

is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);

does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);

does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order
13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997);

is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211
(66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the
Clean Air Act; and

does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects,
using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP
is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA
notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.

B.   Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the
rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to
each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United
States.  EPA will submit a report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register.  A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register.
 This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

 C.  Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial
review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of
Appeals for the appropriate circuit by [Insert date 60 days from date of
publication of this document in the Federal Register].  Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action.  This action approving Delaware’s SIP revision
pertaining to an amendment to the Electric Generating Unit
Multi-Pollutant Regulation of Delaware’s Administrative Code, which
modifies the SO2 mass emissions limit associated with Conectiv Edge Moor
Unit 5, may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements.  (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Particulate matter, and Sulfur oxides.

           W. C. Early, Acting

            Regional Administrator

__February 25, 2010____________			__________________________

Dated:                            				Shawn M. Garvin,

Regional Administrator,

Region III.

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52 - [AMENDED]

1.  The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

               Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart I( Delaware

2.  In ' 52.420, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by renaming the
entry for Table II in  Regulation No. 1146 as Table 5-1 and revising the
entry to read as follows:

( 52.420  		Identification of plan.

*		*		*		*		*

(c) *  *  *

EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE DELAWARE SIP

State citation

	Title/subject	State effective date	EPA approval date	Additional
explanation

         *            *               *              *              *
             *             *

Regulation No. 1146 	Electric Generating Unit (EGU) Multi-Pollutant
Regulation

         *            *               *              *              *
             *             *

Table 5-1 (Formerly Table II)	Annual SO2 Mass Emissions Limit	9/11/08

10/10/09	[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number
where the document begins]	Modified emissions limit for Conectiv Edge
Moor Unit 5

 *             *               *                *                *
        *           *

*	*	*	*	*

 PAGE

 PAGE  7


[Federal Register: September 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 178)]
[Notices]
[Page 56101-56104]
[DOCID:fr15se10-71]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0588; FRL-8843-6]

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel; Notice of Rescheduled Public
Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agency is issuing this notice to reschedule the 3-day
meeting

of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) to consider and review the Chlorpyrifos
Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD)
Modeling linked to the Cumulative and Aggregate Risk Evaluation System
(CARES). The meeting, originally scheduled for October 5-8, 2010, was
announced in the Federal Register of August 18, 2010.

DATES: The meeting will be held on November 2-5, 2010, from 9 a.m. to
approximately 5:30 p.m.
    Comments. The Agency encourages that written comments be submitted
by October 26, 2010, and requests for oral comments be submitted by
October 29, 2010. However, written comments and requests to make oral
comments may be submitted until the date of the meeting, but anyone
submitting written comments after October 26, 2010, should contact the
Designated Federal Official (DFO) listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. For additional instructions, see Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
    Nominations. Nominations of candidates to serve as ad hoc members
of FIFRA SAP for this meeting should be provided on or before September
29, 2010.
    Webcast. This meeting may be webcast. Please refer to the FIFRA
SAP's website, http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/SAP for information on how to
access the webcast. Please note that the webcast is a supplementary
public process provided only for convenience. If difficulties arise
resulting in webcasting outages, the meeting will continue as planned.
    Special accommodations. For information on access or services for
individuals with disabilities, and to request accommodation of a
disability, please contact the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT at least 10 days prior to the meeting to give EPA as much time
as possible to process your request.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Conference Center, Lobby Level, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA 22202.
    Comments. Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0588, by one of the following methods:
      Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
      Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory
Public Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours of operation (8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions. Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2010-0588. If your comments contain any information that you consider
to be CBI or otherwise protected, please contact the DFO listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT to obtain special instructions before
submitting your comments. EPA's policy is that all comments received
will be included in the docket without change and may be made available
on-line at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through
regulations.gov or e-mail. The regulations.gov website is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and
other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk
or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available at http://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either in the electronic
docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of
operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Nominations, requests to present oral comments, and requests for
special accommodations. Submit nominations to serve as ad hoc members
of FIFRA SAP, requests for special seating accommodations, or requests
to present oral comments to the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharlene Matten, DFO, Office of
Science Coordination and Policy (7201M), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001;
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 I. General Information

 A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. This action may,
however, be of interest to persons who are or may be required to
conduct testing of chemical substances under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), FIFRA, and the Food Quality Protection Act of
1996 (FQPA). Since other entities may also be interested, the Agency
has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be
affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the DFO
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

 B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    When submitting comments, remember to:
    1. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
     2. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    3. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.

    4. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    5. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    6. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    7. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    8. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline
identified.

 C. How May I Participate in this Meeting?

    You may participate in this meeting by following the instructions
in this unit. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, it is imperative that
you identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0588 in the subject line
on the first page of your request.
    1. Written comments. The Agency encourages that written comments be
submitted, using the instructions in ADDRESSES, no later than October
26, 2010, to provide FIFRA SAP the time necessary to consider and
review the written comments. Written comments are accepted until the
date of the meeting, but anyone submitting written comments after
October 26, 2010, should contact the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. Anyone submitting written comments at the meeting
should bring 30 copies for distribution to FIFRA SAP.
    2. Oral comments. The Agency encourages that each individual or
group wishing to make brief oral comments to FIFRA SAP submit their
request to the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT no
later than October 29, 2010, in order to be included on the meeting
agenda. Requests to present oral comments will be accepted until the
date of the meeting and, to the extent that time permits, the Chair of
FIFRA SAP may permit the presentation of oral comments at the meeting
by interested persons who have not previously requested time. The
request should identify the name of the individual making the
presentation, the organization (if any) the individual will represent,
and any requirements for audiovisual equipment (e.g., overhead
projector, 35 mm projector, chalkboard). Oral comments before FIFRA SAP
are limited to approximately 5 minutes unless prior arrangements have
been made. In addition, each speaker should bring 30 copies of his or
her comments and presentation slides for distribution to the FIFRA SAP
at the meeting.
    3. Seating at the meeting. Seating at the meeting will be open and
on a first-come basis.
    4. Request for nominations to serve as ad hoc members of FIFRA SAP
for this meeting. As part of a broader process for developing a pool of
candidates for each meeting, FIFRA SAP staff routinely solicits the
stakeholder community for nominations of prospective candidates for
service as ad hoc members of FIFRA SAP. Any interested person or
organization may nominate qualified individuals to be considered as
prospective candidates for a specific meeting. Individuals nominated
for this meeting should have expertise in one or more of the following
areas: Risk Assessment, organophosphate pesticides, cholinesterase
inhibition, data-derived uncertainty factors (also referred to as
chemical specific adjustment factors), pharmacodynamic modeling,
physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, biomonitoring data,
statistical modeling, probabilistic techniques, and dietary exposure to
pesticides. Nominees should be scientists who have sufficient
professional qualifications, including training and experience, to be
capable of providing expert comments on the scientific issues for this
meeting. Nominees should be identified by name, occupation, position,
address, and telephone number. Nominations should be provided to the
DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT on or before September
29, 2010. The Agency will consider all nominations of prospective
candidates for this meeting that are received on or before this date.
However, final selection of ad hoc members for this meeting is a
discretionary function of the Agency.
     The selection of scientists to serve on FIFRA SAP is based on the
function of the panel and the expertise needed to address the Agency's
charge to the panel. No interested scientists shall be ineligible to
serve by reason of their membership on any other advisory committee to
a Federal department or agency or their employment by a Federal
department or agency except the EPA. Other factors considered during
the selection process include availability of the potential panel
member to fully participate in the panel's reviews, absence of any
conflicts of interest or appearance of lack of impartiality,
independence with respect to the matters under review, and lack of
bias. Although financial conflicts of interest, the appearance of lack
of impartiality, lack of independence, and bias may result in
disqualification, the absence of such concerns does not assure that a
candidate will be selected to serve on FIFRA SAP. Numerous qualified
candidates are identified for each panel. Therefore, selection
decisions involve carefully weighing a number of factors including the
candidates' areas of expertise and professional qualifications and
achieving an overall balance of different scientific perspectives on
the panel. In order to have the collective breadth of experience needed
to address the Agency's charge for this meeting, the Agency anticipates
selecting approximately 10-15 ad hoc scientists.
    FIFRA SAP members are subject to the provisions of 5 CFR part 2634,
Executive Branch Financial Disclosure, as supplemented by the EPA in 5
CFR part 6401. In anticipation of this requirement, prospective
candidates for service on the FIFRA SAP will be asked to submit
confidential financial information which shall fully disclose, among
other financial interests, the candidate's employment, stocks and
bonds, and where applicable, sources of research support. EPA will
evaluate the candidates financial disclosure form to assess whether
there are financial conflicts of interest, appearance of a lack of
impartiality or any prior involvement with the development of the
documents under consideration (including previous scientific peer
review) before the candidate is considered further for service on FIFRA
SAP. Those who are selected from the pool of prospective candidates
will be asked to attend the public meetings and to participate in the
discussion of key issues and assumptions at these meetings. In
addition, they will be asked to review and to help finalize the meeting
minutes. The list of FIFRA SAP members participating at this meeting
will be posted on the FIFRA SAP website at http://epa.gov/scipoly/sap
or may be obtained from the OPP Regulatory Public Docket at http://
www.regulations.gov.

 II. Background

 A. Purpose of FIFRA SAP

    FIFRA SAP serves as the primary scientific peer review mechanism of
EPA's Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP) and is
structured to provide scientific advice, information and
recommendations to the EPA Administrator on pesticides and pesticide-
related issues as to the impact of regulatory actions on health and the
environment. FIFRA SAP is a Federal advisory committee established in
1975 under FIFRA that operates in accordance with requirements of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act. FIFRA SAP is composed of a permanent
panel

consisting of seven members who are appointed by the EPA Administrator
from nominees provided by the National Institutes of Health and the
National Science Foundation. FIFRA, as amended by FQPA, established a
Science Review Board consisting of at least 60 scientists who are
available to the SAP on an ad hoc basis to assist in reviews conducted
by the SAP. As a peer review mechanism, FIFRA SAP provides comments,
evaluations and recommendations to improve the effectiveness and
quality of analyses made by Agency scientists. Members of FIFRA SAP are
scientists who have sufficient professional qualifications, including
training and experience, to provide expert advice and recommendation to
the Agency.

 B. Public Meeting

    Chlorpyrifos (0,0-diethyl-0-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl
phosphorothioate) is a broad-spectrum, chlorinated organophosphate (OP)
insecticide. In 2000, nearly all residential uses were voluntarily
canceled by Dow AgroSciences, but agricultural uses remain. The 2000
human health risk assessment was largely based on adult laboratory
animal data (rat or dog) for cholinesterase inhibition and the
application of default uncertainty factors to address inter- and intra-
species differences including susceptible populations. Currently, the
Agency is developing a new human health risk assessment expected to be
released in 2010. In 2008, the FIFRA SAP reviewed a draft science issue
paper on the human health effects of chlorpyrifos. Since that time, Dow
AgroSciences has undergone a research effort to improve the existing
PBPK/PD model developed by Dr. Charles Timchalk and co-workers at
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Dow AgroSciences has also
developed a proposed approach for linking this PBPK/PD model to the
CARES, see http://www.ilsi.org/ResearchFoundation/Pages/CARES.aspx, a
publically available probabilistic exposure model. The purpose of the
October 2010 SAP meeting will be to review the PBPK/PD model and to
evaluate the proposed approach for linking this model to CARES. The
linking of the chlorpyrifos PBPK/PD model to CARES may provide
opportunities to integrate distributions of exposure to chlorpyrifos
and its metabolites with cholinesterase inhibition levels across the
U.S. population. In addition, this approach may allow estimation of
data-derived uncertainty factors that consider use of toxicokinetic and
toxicodynamic data to inform quantitative extrapolations for
interspecies differences and human variability in dose response
assessment. The topics to be covered in the October 2010 SAP are
consistent with EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs continuing efforts
to improve the scientific basis for risk assessment by broadening the
application of probabilistic exposure techniques and PBPK models. The
Agency has a conceptually similar effort on-going to link PBPK models
for pyrethroids to the Stochastic Human Exposure and Dose Simulation
model for multimedia and multipathway chemicals (SHEDS-Multimedia), a
probabilistic exposure model developed by EPA's Office of Research and
Development, that was reviewed by the SAP in July 2010. The current
effort by Dow AgroSciences is a research effort which may, if
sufficiently robust, inform future risk assessments. The October
meeting is a key milestone in this effort. The Agency will solicit
feedback from the Panel on technical issues related to the PBPK/PD
model, the proposed approach for linking the PBPK/PD model with CARES,
and the use of such linked models in risk assessment.

C. FIFRA SAP Documents and Meeting Minutes

    EPA's background paper, related supporting materials, charge/
questions to FIFRA SAP, FIFRA SAP composition (i.e., members and ad hoc
members for this meeting), and the meeting agenda will be available by
mid-October 2010. In addition, the Agency may provide additional
background documents as the materials become available. You may obtain
electronic copies of these documents, and certain other related
documents that might be available electronically, at http://
www.regulations.gov and the FIFRA SAP homepage at http://www.epa.gov/
scipoly/sap.
    FIFRA SAP will prepare meeting minutes summarizing its
recommendations to the Agency approximately 90 days after the meeting.
The meeting minutes will be posted on the FIFRA SAP website or may be
obtained from the OPP Regulatory Public Docket at http://
www.regulations.gov.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: September 2, 2010.
Steven M. Knott,
Acting Director, Office of Science Coordination and Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-22974 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37775-37777]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14729]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0106; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-150-AD;
Amendment 39-17093; AD 2012-12-13]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited Model BAe 146 and Avro 146-RJ airplanes.
This AD was prompted by reports of baggage bay fire bottles that can be
misassembled such that two squib electrical connectors can be cross-
connected. This AD requires a general visual inspection of certain
baggage bay fire bottles for correct connection and for the length of
the wiring loom, modification of the wiring loom to certain squib
connectors, and corrective actions if necessary. We are issuing this AD
to detect and correct excessive wiring loom length and improper
connection of the squib connecters, which in conjunction with a fire in
one of the baggage bays, could result in the fire extinguishing agent
being discharged into a wrong compartment and consequent damage to the
airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective July 30, 2012.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of July 30,
2012.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-
1175; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on February 8, 2012 (77
FR 6520). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    The baggage bay fire bottles of certain BAe 146 and AVRO 146-RJ
aeroplanes can be misassembled such that two squib electrical
connectors can be cross-connected. This has been caused by an error
in the baggage bay fire bottle Component Manufacturer Manual (CMM)
and by excessive wiring loom length.
    This condition, if not corrected and in conjunction with a fire
in one of the baggage bays, could result in the fire extinguishant
to be discharged into a wrong compartment and consequent potential
damage to the aircraft * * *.
    In addition to the CMM revision, to address this unsafe
condition, BAE Systems developed modifications to reroute the
baggage bay fire bottle wiring looms and prevent crossed electrical
connections.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires the
implementation of modifications HCM36250A and HCM36250B to affected
aeroplanes.

Required actions include general visual inspections of certain baggage
bay fire bottles for correct connection and for the length of the
wiring loom, modification of the wiring loom to certain squib
connectors, and corrective actions if necessary. Corrective actions
include reconnecting the squib connectors and modifying the loom to
proper length. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI
in the AD docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (77 FR 6520, February 8,
2012) or on the determination of the cost to the public.

Revised Heading and Wording for Credit Paragraph

    We have revised the heading and wording for paragraph (h) of this
AD. This change does not affect the intent of that paragraph.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available, and determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD with the changes described
previously--except for minor editorial changes. We have determined that
these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (77 FR 6520, February 8, 2012) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 6520, February 8, 2012).

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 1 product of U.S. registry. We
also estimate that it will take about 6 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $170 per product.
Where the service information lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge
for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based
on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S. operator
to be $680 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 3 work-hours and require parts costing $170, for a cost of
$425 per product. We have no way of determining the number of products
that may need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;

    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM (77 FR 6520, February 8,
2012), the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2012-12-13 BAE Systems (Operations) Limited: Amendment 39-17093.
Docket No. FAA-2012-0106; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-150-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective July 30,
2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Model BAe
146-100A, -200A, and -300A airplanes, and Model Avro 146-RJ70A, 146-
RJ85A, and 146-RJ100A airplanes; certificated in any category; all
serial numbers, on which modification HCM30480A, HCM30480B,
HCM30480C, HCM30480D, HCM30480E, or HCM30480F are embodied.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 26: Fire
Protection.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of baggage bay fire bottles that
can be misassembled such that two squib electrical connectors can be
cross-connected. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
excessive wiring loom length and improper connection of the squib
connecters, which in conjunction with a fire in one of the baggage
bays, could result in the fire extinguishing agent being discharged
into a wrong compartment and consequent damage to the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Inspection/Modification

    Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(3), (g)(4),
(g)(5), and (g)(6) of this AD.
    (1) Do a general visual inspection of baggage bay fire bottle
WB8 having part number (P/N) 473997-1 for correct connection of the
squib connectors identified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) and (g)(1)(ii)
of this AD, in accordance with paragraph 2.C.(3) of the
Accomplishment Instructions of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Modification Service Bulletin SB.26-077-36250A.B, Revision 4, dated
January 7, 2011. If any items are found improperly connected, before
further flight, reconnect the squib connectors properly, in
accordance with paragraph 2.C.(3) of the Accomplishment Instructions
of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Modification Service Bulletin
SB.26-077-36250A.B, Revision 4, dated January 7, 2011.
    (i) Squib connector WB8P1 (S1446-004A) and cartridge P/N 446307.
    (ii) Squib connector WB8P2 (S1446-004D) and squib P/N 446290.
    (2) Do a general visual inspection of the length of the wiring
loom at the squib connector WB8P2 for excessive length that could
cause the connector to become cross-connected with squib connector
WB8P1, in accordance with paragraph 2.C.(4) of the Accomplishment
Instructions of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Modification
Service Bulletin SB.26-077-36250A.B, Revision 4, dated January 7,
2011. If excessive length is found, before further flight, modify
the loom, in accordance with paragraph 2.C.(4) of the Accomplishment
Instructions of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Modification
Service Bulletin SB.26-077-36250A.B, Revision 4, dated January 7,
2011.
    (3) Do a general visual inspection of baggage bay fire bottle
WB7 having P/N 473996-1 for correct connection of squib connectors
identified in paragraphs (g)(3)(i) and (g)(3)(ii) of this AD, in
accordance with paragraph 2.C.(5) of the Accomplishment Instructions
of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Modification Service Bulletin
SB.26-077-36250A.B, Revision 4, dated January 7, 2011. If any items
are found improperly connected, before further flight, reconnect the
squib connectors properly, in accordance with paragraph 2.C.(5) of
the Accomplishment Instructions of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Modification Service Bulletin SB.26-077-36250A.B, Revision 4, dated
January 7, 2011.
    (i) Squib connector WB7P1 (S1446-004A) and cartridge P/N 446307.
    (ii) Squib connector WB7P2 (S1446-004D) and squib P/N 446290.
    (4) Modify the wiring loom to squib connector WB7P2, in
accordance with paragraphs 2.C.(6)(a) and 2.C.(6)(c) of the
Accomplishment Instructions of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Modification Service Bulletin SB.26-077-36250A.B, Revision 4, dated
January 7, 2011.
    (5) Modify the wiring loom to squib connector WB7P1, in
accordance with paragraph 2.C.(6)(b) of the Accomplishment
Instructions of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Modification
Service Bulletin SB.26-077-36250A.B, Revision 4, dated January 7,
2011.
    (6) Install modification HCM36250B, in accordance with paragraph
2.C.(7) of the Accomplishment Instructions of BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Modification Service Bulletin SB.26-077-
36250A.B, Revision 4, dated January 7, 2011.

    Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: Guidance for test and close-
up procedures can be found in paragraphs 2.D. and 2.E. of the
Accomplishment Instructions of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Modification Service Bulletin SB.26-077-36250A.B, Revision 4, dated
January 7, 2011.

(h) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for installing the modification
HCM36250A required by paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(3), (g)(4), and
(g)(5) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using the service information specified in
paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(4) of this AD.
    (1) BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Modification Service
Bulletin SB.26-077-36250A, dated September 4, 2009.
    (2) BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Modification Service
Bulletin SB.26-077-36250A, Revision 1, dated September 11, 2009.
    (3) BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Modification Service
Bulletin SB.26-077-36250A.B, Revision 2, dated October 14, 2010.
    (4) BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Modification Service
Bulletin SB.26-077-36250A.B, Revision 3, dated November 23, 2010.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.

In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the International Branch, send it
to ATTN: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (425)
227-1149. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(j) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2011-0065, dated April 7, 2011; and BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Modification Service Bulletin SB.26-077-
36250A.B, Revision 4, dated January 7, 2011; for related
information.

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the following service
information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use the following service information to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Modification Service
Bulletin SB.26-077-36250A.B, Revision 4, dated January 7, 2011.
    (3) For BAE Systems (Operations) Limited service information
identified in this AD, contact BAE Systems (Operations) Limited,
Customer Information Department, Prestwick International Airport,
Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, United Kingdom; telephone +44 1292
675207; fax +44 1292 675704; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.baesystems.com/Businesses/RegionalAircraft/index.htm.
    (4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 7, 2012.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-14729 Filed 6-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 7, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63269-63271]
[FR Doc No: 2020-22149]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1353-010.
    Applicants: Northern Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Compliance filing 20200918 Compliance of Settlement to
be effective 1/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5144.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1123-001.
    Applicants: Millennium Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing RAM 2020--Periodic RAM Adj--
Compliance Filing to be effective 10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5113.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1160-001.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Initial Rate Filing--Southeastern
Trail Project--Amendment to be effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5129.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1238-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmts
(Atlanta Gas 8438 to various shippers eff 10-1-2020) to be effective
10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5005.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1239-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt
(Constellation 53096 to Exelon 53144) to be effective 10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5006.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1240-000.
    Applicants: Northern Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 20200930 Negotiated Rate to be
effective 10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5020.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1241-000.

    Applicants: Dominion Energy Cove Point LNG, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: DECP--2020 PVIC Rate New
Provision to be effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5021.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1242-000.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: WPL NC ETS Agreement to be
effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5022.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1243-000.
    Applicants: Trunkline Gas Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Fuel Filing on 9-30-20 to be
effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5026.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1244-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Gas Storage Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Fuel Filing on 9-30-20 to be
effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5027.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1245-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: DETI--2020 Annual EPCA to be
effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5029.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1246-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: DETI--2020 Annual TCRA to be
effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5033.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1247-000.
    Applicants: Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 2020 P2/AltP2 Rates, 10-Year
2010 Expansion to be effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5046.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1248-000.
    Applicants: Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 2020 September Negotiated Rate
Agreement Amendment to be effective 10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5047.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1249-000.
    Applicants: LA Storage, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Filing of Negotiated Rate,
Conforming IW Agreements 10.1.20 to be effective 10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5048.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1250-000.
    Applicants: National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: GT&C Section 42 (PS/GHG)
Tracker Filing to be effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5050.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1251-000.
    Applicants: Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Fuel Filing on 9-30-20 to be
effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5052.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1252-000.
    Applicants: Rover Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Fuel Filing on 9-30-20 to be
effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5069.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1253-000.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Pipeline Safety and Greenhouse
Gas Cost Adjustment Mechanism--2020 to be effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5070.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1255-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Carolina Gas Transmission.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: DECG--2020 FRQ and TDA Report
to be effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5080.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1256-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement
Update (APS Oct 2020) to be effective 10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5104.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1257-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Non-Conforming Agreement (MRC
Permian) to be effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5110.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1258-000.
    Applicants: Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement
Filing (BP Energy #211039-TF1CIG) to be effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5114.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1259-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Cherokee
AGL--Replacement Shippers--Oct 2020 to be effective 10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5117.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1260-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Atlantic Bridge In-Service NRA
Filing to be effective 10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5118.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1261-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Atlantic Bridge In-Service NC
Filing to be effective 10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5120.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1262-000.
    Applicants: Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: MNUS FRQ 2020 Filing to be
effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5163.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1263-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Non-Conforming Agreements
Filing (Sempra) to be effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5184.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1264-000.
    Applicants: Young Gas Storage Company, Ltd.

    Description: Compliance filing Operational Purchase and Sale
Report.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5186.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1265-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: REX 2020-09-30 Negotiated Rate
Agreement Amendments to be effective 10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5193.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1266-000.
    Applicants: Ozark Gas Transmission, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing Ozark Gas Revision to Non-Conforming
Agreements to be effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200930-5194.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 1, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-22149 Filed 10-6-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P