13013211 13A  Raspberry, juice-babyfood          0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

04023220 4B   Rhubarb                            0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

15003230 15   Rice, white                        0.003500   1.000      0.150   Avg*%T

15003231 15   Rice, white-babyfood               0.003500   1.000      0.150   Avg*%T

15003240 15   Rice, brown                        0.346000   1.000      0.150   Avg*%T

15003241 15   Rice, brown-babyfood               0.346000   1.000      0.150   Avg*%T

15003250 15   Rice, flour                        0.003500   1.000      0.150   Avg*%T

15003251 15   Rice, flour-babyfood               0.003500   1.000      0.150   Avg*%T

15003260 15   Rice, bran                         0.346000   1.000      0.150   Avg*%T

15003261 15   Rice, bran-babyfood                0.346000   1.000      0.150   Avg*%T

01013270 1AB  Rutabaga                           0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

15003280 15   Rye, grain                         0.007000   1.000      1.000   WhtDet

15003290 15   Rye, flour                         0.007000   1.000      1.000   WhtDet

20003300 20   Safflower, oil                     0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

20003301 20   Safflower, oil-babyfood            0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

01013310 1AB  Salsify, roots                     0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

02003320 2    Salsify, tops                      0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003330 O    Sapote, Mamey                      0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

19013340 19A  Savory                             0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003350 O    Seaweed                            0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003351 O    Seaweed-babyfood                   0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003360 O    Sesame, seed                       0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003361 O    Sesame, seed-babyfood              0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003370 O    Sesame, oil                        0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003371 O    Sesame, oil-babyfood               0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

03003380 3    Shallot                            0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

26003390 M    Sheep, meat                        0.001700   1.000      1.000   BfMrkt

26003391 M    Sheep, meat-babyfood               0.001700   1.000      1.000   BfMrkt

26003400 M    Sheep, meat byproducts             0.001700   1.000      1.000   BfMrkt

26003410 M    Sheep, fat                         0.001700   1.000      1.000   BfMrkt

26003411 M    Sheep, fat-babyfood                0.001700   1.000      1.000   BfMrkt

26003420 M    Sheep, kidney                      0.001700   1.000      1.000   BfMrkt

26003430 M    Sheep, liver                       0.001700   1.000      1.000   BfMrkt

15003440 15   Sorghum, grain                     0.077500   1.000      0.010   Avg*%T

15003450 15   Sorghum, syrup                     0.077500   1.000      0.010   Avg*%T

95003460 O    Soursop                            0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

06003470 6    Soybean, seed                      0.000100   1.000      1.000   SoyPDP

06003480 6    Soybean, flour                     0.000100   1.000      1.000   SoyPDP

06003481 6    Soybean, flour-babyfood            0.000100   1.000      1.000   SoyPDP

06003490 6    Soybean, soy milk                  0.000100   1.000      1.000   SoyPDP

06003491 6    Soybean, soy milk-babyfood or in   0.000100   1.000      1.000   SoyPDP

06003500 6    Soybean, oil                       0.000100   1.000      1.000   SoyPDP

06003501 6    Soybean, oil-babyfood              0.000100   1.000      1.000   SoyPDP

95003510 O    Spanish lime                       0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003520 O    Spearmint                          0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003530 O    Spearmint, oil                     0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

19023540 19B  Spices, other                      0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

19023541 19B  Spices, other-babyfood             0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

04013550 4A   Spinach                            0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

04013551 4A   Spinach-babyfood                   0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

09023560 9B   Squash, summer                     0.020500   1.000      1.000   SqshFT

09023561 9B   Squash, summer-babyfood            0.020500   1.000      1.000   SqshFT

09023570 9B   Squash, winter                     0.020500   1.000      1.000   SqshFT

09023571 9B   Squash, winter-babyfood            0.020500   1.000      1.000   SqshFT

95003580 O    Starfruit                          0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003590 O    Strawberry                         0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003591 O    Strawberry-babyfood                0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003600 O    Strawberry, juice                  0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003601 O    Strawberry, juice-babyfood         0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003610 O    Sugar apple                        0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003620 O    Sugarcane, sugar                   0.019200   1.000      0.050   Avg*%T

95003621 O    Sugarcane, sugar-babyfood          0.019200   1.000      0.050   Avg*%T

95003630 O    Sugarcane, molasses                0.019200   1.000      0.050   Avg*%T

95003631 O    Sugarcane, molasses-babyfood       0.019200   1.000      0.050   Avg*%T

20003640 20   Sunflower, seed                    0.039000   1.000      0.100   Avg*%T

20003650 20   Sunflower, oil                     0.039000   1.000      0.100   Avg*%T

20003651 20   Sunflower, oil-babyfood            0.039000   1.000      0.100   Avg*%T

01033660 1CD  Sweet potato                       0.020000   1.000      1.000   TolLvl

01033661 1CD  Sweet potato-babyfood              0.020000   1.000      1.000   TolLvl

04023670 4B   Swiss chard                        0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003680 O    Tamarind                           0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

10003690 10   Tangerine                          0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

10003700 10   Tangerine, juice                   0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

01033710 1CD  Tanier, corm                       0.020000   1.000      1.000   TolLvl

95003720 O    Tea, dried                         0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003730 O    Tea, instant                       0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

08003740 8    Tomatillo                          0.036200   1.000      0.200   TmtoFT

08003750 8    Tomato                             0.036200   1.000      0.200   TmtoFT

08003751 8    Tomato-babyfood                    0.036200   1.000      0.200   TmtoFT

08003760 8    Tomato, paste                      0.036200   5.400      0.200   TmtoFT

08003761 8    Tomato, paste-babyfood             0.036200   5.400      0.200   TmtoFT

08003770 8    Tomato, puree                      0.036200   3.300      0.200   TmtoFT

08003771 8    Tomato, puree-babyfood             0.036200   3.300      0.200   TmtoFT

08003780 8    Tomato, dried                      0.036200  14.300      0.200   TmtoFT

08003781 8    Tomato, dried-babyfood             0.036200  14.300      0.200   TmtoFT

08003790 8    Tomato, juice                      0.036200   1.500      0.200   TmtoFT

95003800 O    Tomato, Tree                       0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

15003810 15   Triticale, flour                   0.007000   1.000      1.000   WhtDet

15003811 15   Triticale, flour-babyfood          0.007000   1.000      1.000   WhtDet

50003820 P    Turkey, meat                       0.010000   1.000      1.000   TolLvl

50003821 P    Turkey, meat-babyfood              0.010000   1.000      1.000   TolLvl

50003830 P    Turkey, liver                      0.010000   1.000      1.000   TolLvl

50003831 P    Turkey, liver-babyfood             0.010000   1.000      1.000   TolLvl

50003840 P    Turkey, meat byproducts            0.010000   1.000      1.000   TolLvl

50003841 P    Turkey, meat byproducts-babyfood   0.010000   1.000      1.000   TolLvl

50003850 P    Turkey, fat                        0.030000   1.000      1.000   TolLvl

50003851 P    Turkey, fat-babyfood               0.030000   1.000      1.000   TolLvl

50003860 P    Turkey, skin                       0.030000   1.000      1.000   TolLvl

50003861 P    Turkey, skin-babyfood              0.030000   1.000      1.000   TolLvl

01033870 1CD  Turmeric                           0.020000   1.000      1.000   TolLvl

01013880 1AB  Turnip, roots                      0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

05023890 5B   Turnip, greens                     0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003900 O    Vinegar                            0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

14003910 14   Walnut                             0.010000   1.000      0.050   TolLvl

86010000 O    Water, direct, all sources         0.000100   1.000      1.000

86020000 O    Water, indirect, all sources       0.000100   1.000      1.000

95003970 O    Water chestnut                     0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

95003980 O    Watercress                         0.010000   1.000      1.000   FHE

09013990 9A   Watermelon                         0.016300   1.000      1.000   CntlFT

09014000 9A   Watermelon, juice                  0.016300   1.000      1.000   CntlFT

15004010 15   Wheat, grain                       0.000100   1.000      1.000   WhetPD

15004011 15   Wheat, grain-babyfood              0.000100   1.000      1.000   WhetPD

15004020 15   Wheat, flour                       0.000100   1.000      1.000   WhetPD

15004021 15   Wheat, flour-babyfood              0.000100   1.000      1.000   WhetPD

15004030 15   Wheat, germ                        0.000100   1.000      1.000   WhetPD

15004040 15   Wheat, bran                        0.000100   3.000      1.000   WhetPD

15004050 15   Wild rice                          0.003500   1.000      0.150   RiceFT

01034060 1CD  Yam, true                          0.020000   1.000      1.000   TolLvl

01034070 1CD  Yam bean                           0.020000   1.000      1.000   TolLvl

Attachment 5:	Chronic Dietary Analysis (Food + Water) Results file.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency                                 Ver. 2.00

DEEM-FCID Chronic analysis for LAMBDA CYHALOTHRIN               (1994-98 data)

Residue file name: C:\Documents and Settings\aparmar\Desktop\Revised Water\Lambda NU Chronic.R98

                                                     Adjustment factor #2 used.

Analysis Date 11-30-2006/11:50:48     Residue file dated: 11-30-2006/10:58:41/8

Reference dose (RfD, Chronic) = .001 mg/kg bw/day

COMMENT 1: including FHE

======================================================================== =======

                    Total exposure by population subgroup

------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------

                                                    Total Exposure

                                         -----------------------------------

          Population                         mg/kg             Percent of

           Subgroup                       body wt/day             Rfd

--------------------------------------   -------------       ---------------

U.S. Population (total)                     0.000173                17.3%

U.S. Population (spring season)             0.000179                17.9%

U.S. Population (summer season)             0.000181                18.1%

U.S. Population (autumn season)             0.000166                16.6%

U.S. Population (winter season)             0.000166                16.6%

Northeast region                            0.000178                17.8%

Midwest region                              0.000174                17.4%

Southern region                             0.000160                16.0%

Western region                              0.000188                18.8%

Hispanics                                   0.000190                19.0%

Non-hispanic whites                         0.000171                17.1%

Non-hispanic blacks                         0.000160                16.0%

Non-hisp/non-white/non-black                0.000204                20.4%

All infants (< 1 year)                      0.000222                22.2%

Nursing infants                             0.000096                 9.6%

Non-nursing infants                         0.000270                27.0%

Children 1-6  yrs                           0.000400                40.0%

Children 7-12 yrs                           0.000209                20.9%

Females 13-19 (not preg or nursing)         0.000112                11.2%

Females 20+ (not preg or nursing)           0.000119                11.9%

Females 13-50 yrs                           0.000133                13.3%

Females 13+ (preg/not nursing)              0.000124                12.4%

Females 13+ (nursing)                       0.000151                15.1%

Males 13-19 yrs                             0.000148                14.8%

Males 20+ yrs                               0.000168                16.8%

Seniors 55+                                 0.000123                12.3%

Children 1-2 yrs                            0.000503                50.3%

Children 3-5 yrs                            0.000367                36.7%

Children 6-12 yrs                           0.000222                22.2%

Youth 13-19 yrs                             0.000130                13.0%

Adults 20-49 yrs                            0.000153                15.3%

Adults 50+ yrs                              0.000125                12.5%

Females 13-49 yrs                           0.000121                12.1%

------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------

Attachment 6:	BEAD Screening Level Usage Analysis for lambda-cyhalothrin.

Attachment 7:	Processing Factors used for lambda-cyhalothrin Acute and Chronic Dietary Analysis

Processing Factors used for lambda-cyhalothrin Acute and Chronic Dietary Analysis

Commodity	Processing Factor	Source

Apples - dried	8.0	DEEM-FCID Default Processing Factor

Apples - juice/cider	1.3	Default Processing Factor

Also used for pear juice

Apple – peeling, cooking, canning study 1	0.08	Processing Study (MRID# 45443104)

Also used for pear processed food forms

Apricots – dried	6.0	Default Processing Factor

Beef – dried	1.92	Default Processing Factor

Canola – oil 1	2.3	Processing Study (MRID# 45443103)

Cherries – juice	1.5	Default Processing Factor

Corn grain - sugar/hfcs	1.5	Default Processing Factor

Onions - dehydrated or dried	9.0	Default Processing Factor

Peaches – peeling and canning study 1	0.04	Processing Study (MRID# 45443105)

Also used for apricot processed food forms

Peaches – dried	7.0	Default Processing Factor

Peanuts – butter	1.89	Default Processing Factor

Pears – dried	6.25	Default Processing Factor

Plums – prunes (dried) processing study 1	1.4	Processing Study (MRID# 45007007)

Plums - prunes (juice)	1.4	Default Processing Factor

Potatoes/White – dry	6.5	Default Processing Factor

Tomatoes – dried	14.3	Default Processing Factor

Tomatoes – juice	1.5	Default Processing Factor

Tomatoes - paste	5.4	Default Processing Factor

Tomatoes - puree	3.3	Default Processing Factor

Wheat – bran processing study 2	3	Processing Study (MRID# 433308-01)

1 - These processing studies are reviewed in “Request for the Use of Lambda-Cyhalothrin in/on Canola, Pome Fruits, Stone Fruits, Tree Nuts, Almond Hulls, and Tobacco including Apple and Peach Cooking Studies. Evaluation of Analytical Method and Magnitude of the Residue Data” (PP#0F6092, DP Barcode: D262858, D276160 W. Cutchin, Jun 27 2002).

2 - This processing study is reviewed in “Cyhalothrin. Anticipated Residues for Dietary Risk Assessment. CBTS#'s 14,274, 14,415, and 14,558” (9F3770 and 7F3560, D206401 and D208492, J. Morales, Dec 16 1994).

Attachment 8:	Anticipated Residues Summary Table

RAC	Deem Food

Forms	Blending Classification	Data

Source	No. of

Samples	No. of

Detectable

Residues	LOD or LOQ	%CT	Processing

Factors	Anticipated Residue Estimates/Tolerance

	Acute (Tol., AR, RDF)	Chronic (Tol., AR)

	Max	Avg

	Crop Group O: Other

Avocado	All	NB	Avocado FT

MRID:

44325701

45568001	12	12	0.01	100	100	--	RDF #16	0.0725

Cottonseed (oil, oil-babyfood)	All	B	Cotton FT

MRID:

00153043	5	5	0.01	10	10	--	Blended

0.02	Blended

0.02

Hop	All	B	Hop FT

MRID:

41614605

41614606

41614607

42172306

42172307

42182302	3	3	0.01	100	100	--	Blended

3.86	Blended

3.86

Peanut (peanut, oil)	All	B	Peanut FT

MRID: 42273202	12	12	0.02	10	5	--	Blended

0.04	Blended

0.04

Peanut, butter	All	B	Peanut FT

MRID: 42273202	12	12	0.02	10	5	1.890	Blended

0.04	Blended

0.04

Sugercane (sugar, sugar-babyfood, molasses, molasses-babyfood)	All	B Sugarcane FT

MRID:

44325709

45568001	18	18	0.01	10	5	--	Blended

0.0192	Blended

0.0192

Water (direct, indirect)	All	N/A	EFED	--	--	--	--	--	--	0.005350	0.0001

Crop Group M: Meat

Beef. meat (all beef commodities except beef, meat-dried)	All	N/A	Beef Fat Market Basket Data	232	16	0.0015	--	--	--	RDF #9	0.0017

Beef, meat-dried	All	N/A	Beef Fat Market Basket Data	232	16	0.0015	--	-- 1.920	RDF #9	0.0017

Goat (all goat commodities)	All	N/A	Beef Fat Market Basket Data	232	16 0.0015	--	--	--	RDF #9	0.0017

Horse, meat	All	N/A	Beef Fat Market Basket Data	232	16	0.0015	--	--	-- RDF #9	0.0017

Game, meat	All	N/A	Beef Fat Market Basket Data	232	16	0.0015	--	--	-- RDF #9	0.0017

Pork (all pork commodities)	All	N/A	Beef Fat Market Basket Data	232	16 0.0015	--	--	--	RDF #9	0.0017

Rabbit, meat	All	N/A	Beef Fat Market Basket Data	232	16	0.0015	--	--	-- RDF #9	0.0017

Sheep (all sheep commodities)	All	N/A	Beef Fat Market Basket Data	232	16 0.0015	--	--	--	RDF #9	0.0017

Crop Group P: Poultry

Chicken (meat, meat-babyfood, liver, meat byproducts, meat byproducts-babyfood)	All	N/A	Tolerance	--	--	--	--	--	--	Tolerance

0.01	Tolerance

0.01

Chicken (fat, fat-babyfood, skin, skin-babyfood)	All	N/A	Tolerance	--	-- --	--	--	--	Tolerance

0.03	Tolerance

0.03

Egg (All egg commodities)	All	N/A	Tolerance	--	--	--	--	--	--	Tolerance

0.01	Tolerance

0.01

Poultry (other meat, other liver, other meat byproducts) 	All	N/A Tolerance	--	--	--	--	--	--	Tolerance

0.01	Tolerance

0.01

Poultry (other fat, other skin)	All	N/A	Tolerance	--	--	--	--	--	-- Tolerance

0.03	Tolerance

0.03

Turkey (meat, meat babyfood, liver, liver babyfood, meat byproducts, meat byproducts-babyfood)	All	N/A	Tolerance	--	--	--	--	--	--	Tolerance

0.01	Tolerance

0.01

Turkey (fat, fat-babyfood, skin, skin-babyfood)	All	N/A	Tolerance	--	-- --	--	--	--	Tolerance

0.03	Tolerance

0.03

Crop Group D: Dairy Products

Milk (all milk commodities)	All	N/A	Butter PDP 2003	731	422	0.0028	--	-- --	RDF #21	0.0065

Crop Group 1C: Tuberous and Corm Vegetable

Potato, dry (all potato dry commodities)	All	B	Potato FT

MRID:

46665304	32	0	0.01	100	100	6.5	RDF #26	Blended

0.01

Potato (chips, flour, flour-babyfood, tuber w/peel, tuber w/peel-babyfood, tuber w/o peel, tuber w/o peel-babyfood)	All	NB/PB Potato FT

MRID:

46665304	32	0	0.01	100	100	--	RDF #26	0.01

Arrowroot (flour, flour-babyfood)	All	B	Tolerance	--	--	--	100	100	-- Tolerance

0.02	Tolerance

0.02

Artichoke, Jerusalem	All	NB	Tolerance	--	--	--	100	100	--	Tolerance

0.02	Tolerance

0.02

Cassava (cassava, cassava-babyfood)	All	NB/PB	Tolerance	--	--	--	100	100 --	Tolerance

0.02	Tolerance

0.02

Dasheen, corm	All	NB/PB	Tolerance	--	--	--	100	100	--	Tolerance

0.02	Tolerance

0.02

Ginger (ginger, ginger-babyfood, dried)	All	NB	Tolerance	--	--	--	100 100	--	Tolerance

0.02	Tolerance

0.02

Sweet potato (sweet potato, sweet potato-babyfood)	All	NB/PB	Tolerance --	--	--	100	100	--	Tolerance

0.02	Tolerance

0.02

Tanier, corm	All	NB/PB	Tolerance	--	--	--	100	100	--	Tolerance

0.02	Tolerance

0.02

Tumeric	All	NB	Tolerance	--	--	--	100	100	--	Tolerance

0.02	Tolerance

0.02

Yam (true, bean)	All	NB/PB	Tolerance	--	--	--	100	100	--	Tolerance

0.02	Tolerance

0.02

Crop Group 3: Bulb Vegetable

Garlic (all garlic commodities)	All	NB/PB	Onion PDP 2002 - 2003	1049	0 0.0035	30	10	--	RDF #23	0.0004

Onion (dry bulb, dry bulb-babyfood)	All	NB/PB	Onion PDP 2002 - 2003	1049 0	0.0035	55	50	--	RDF #3	0.0018

Onion (dry bulb dried, dry bulb dried-babyfood)	All	B	Onion PDP 2002 - 2003	1049	0	0.0035	55	50	9.0	Blended

0.0035	Blended

0.0018

Crop Group 4A: Leafy Greens

Lettuce (head, leaf)	All	NB/PB	Lettuce PDP 2004 - 2005	1054	102	0.0030 45	30	--	RDF #4	0.0073

Crop Group 5A: Brassica (Head and Stem)

Broccoli (broccoli, broccoli-babyfood, Chinese)	All	NB/PB	Broccoli PDP 2002	522	1	0.0050	20	10	--	RDF #5	0.0005

Brussels sprouts	All	PB	Broccoli PDP 2002	522	1	0.0050	20	10	--	RDF #5 0.0005

Cabbage (cabbage, Chinese bok choy, Chinese napa)	All	NB/PB	Cabbage FT

MRID:

41737006	11	11	0.01	45	30	--	RDF #6	0.0236

Cabbage, Chinese, mustard	All	NB/PB	Cabbage FT

MRID:

41737006	11	11	0.01	45	30	--	RDF #6	0.0236

Cauliflower	All	NB/PB	Cauliflower PDP 2004 - 2005	926	0	0.0084	30	20	-- RDF #20	0.0017

Kohlrabi	All	NB/PB	Cabbage FT

MRID:

41737006	11	11	0.01	45	30	--	RDF #6	0.0236

Crop Group 6: Legume Vegetable

Bean, snap (succulent, succulent babyfood)	All	PB	Bean, Succulent FT

MRID:

44325706	12	12	0.01	20	10	--	RDF #19	0.01

Pea, edible podded, succulent	All	PB	Pea PDP 2002 - 2003	521	0	0.0075 2.5	1	--	RDF #29	0.0001

Bean, succulent	All	PB	Bean, Succulent FT

MRID:

44325706	12	12	0.01	20	10	--	RDF #19	0.01

Pea, succulent	All	PB	Pea PDP 2002 - 2003	521	0	0.0075	2.5	1	--	RDF #29 0.0001

Bean, dry	All	B	Bean, Dry FT

MRID: 44325706

45568001	18	18	0.01	2.5	1	--	Blended

0.0103	Blended

0.0103

Pea, dry	All	B	Pea, Dry FT

MRID:

44325706

45568001	10	10	0.01	2.5	1	--	Blended

0.0175	Blended

0.0175

Soybean (all soybean commodities)	All	B	Soybean PDP 2005	368	0	0.0030	10 5	--	Blended

0.02	Blended

0.0001

Crop Group 8: Fruiting Vegetable

Eggplant	All	NB	Tolerance level	--	--	--	100	100	--	Tolerance

0.2	Tolerance

0.2

Okra	All	NB/PB	Tolerance level	--	--	--	100	100	--	Tolerance

0.2	Tolerance

0.2

Pepper, bell (bell, bell-babyfood, dried, dried-babyfood)	All	NB/PB	Bell Pepper PDP 2002 & 2004	1485	45	0.0026	15	5	--	RDF #17	0.0005

Pepper, nonbell (nonbell, nonbell-babyfood, dried)	All	NB/PB	Non-Bell Pepper FT

MRID: 44325702	6	6	0.01	15	5	--	RDF #18	0.0833

Tomatillo	All	NB/PB	Tomato FT

MRID:

41737007	13	13	0.01	20	20	--	RDF #7	0.0362

Tomato (tomato, tomato-babyfood)	All	NB/PB	Tomato FT

MRID:

41737007	13	13	0.01	20	20	--	RDF #7	0.0362

Tomato, paste (paste, paste-babyfood) 	All	PB	Tomato FT

MRID:

41737007	13	13	0.01	20	20	5.4	RDF #7	0.0362

Tomato, puree (puree, puree-babyfood)	All	PB	Tomato FT

MRID:

41737007	13	13	0.01	20	20	3.3	RDF #7	0.0362

Tomato, dried (dried, dried-babyfood)	All	PB	Tomato FT

MRID:

41737007	13	13	0.01	20	20	14.3	RDF #7	0.0362

Tomato, juice	All	PB	Tomato FT

MRID:

41737007	13	13	0.01	20	20	1.5	RDF #7	0.0362

Crop Group 9: Cucurbit Vegetables

Balsam pear	All	NB/PB	Cucumber FT

MRID:

46665302	14	8	0.01	100	100	--	RDF #25	0.0143

Cantaloupe	All	NB/PB	Cantaloupe FT

MRID:

46665301	12	6	0.01	100	100	--	RDF #24	0.0163

Casaba	All	NB	CantaloupeFT

MRID:

46665301	12	6	0.01	100	100	--	RDF #24	0.0163

Chayote, fruit	All	NB	Squash FT

MRID:

46665303	10	5	0.01	100	100	--	RDF #27	0.0205

Chinese waxgourd	All	NB	Cucumber FT

MRID:

46665302	14	8	0.01	100	100	--	RDF #25	0.0143

Cucumber	All	NB/PB	Cucumber FT

MRID:

46665302	14	8	0.01	100	100	--	RDF #25	0.0143

Honeydew melon	All	NB	Cantaloupe FT

MRID:

46665301	12	6	0.01	100	100	--	RDF #24	0.0163

Pumpkin (pumpkin, seed)	All	NB/PB	Squash FT

MRID:

46665303	10	5	0.01	100	100	--	RDF #27	0.0205

Squash (summer, summer-babyfood, winter, winter-babyfood)	All	NB/PB Squash FT

MRID:

46665303	10	5	0.01	100	100	--	RDF #27	0.0205

Watermelon (watermelon, juice)	All	NB/PB	Cantaloupe FT

MRID:

46665301	12	6	0.01	100	100	--	RDF #24	0.0163

Crop Group 11: Pome Fruits

Apple, fruit with peel	Uncooked	NB/PB	Apple PDP 2004 - 2005	1056	12 0.0068	10	5	--	RDF #10	0.0004

Apple, fruit with peel	Cooked	NB/PB	Apple PDP 2004 - 2005	1056	12	0.0068 10	5	.08	RDF #10	0.0004

Apple, peeled fruit	Uncooked	NB/PB	Apple PDP 2004 - 2005	1056	12	0.0068 10	5	--	RDF #10	0.0004

Apple, peeled fruit	Cooked	NB/PB	Apple PDP 2004 - 2005	1056	12	0.0068	10 5	.08	RDF #10	0.0004

Apple, peeled fruit-babyfood	Cooked	NB/PB	Apple PDP 2004 - 2005	1056	12 0.0068	10	5	.08	RDF #10	0.0004

Apple, dried (dried, dried-babyfood)	All	B	Apple PDP 2004 - 2005	1056	12 0.0068	10	5	8.0	RDF #22	0.0004

Apple, juice (juice, juice-babyfood)	All	PB	Apple PDP 2004 - 2005	1056 12	0.0068	10	5	1.3	RDF #10	0.0004

Apple, sauce	Uncooked	PB	Apple PDP 2004 - 2005	1056	12	0.0068	10	5	-- RDF #10	0.0004

Apple, sauce	Cooked	PB	Apple PDP 2004 - 2005	1056	12	0.0068	10	5	.08	RDF #10	0.0004

Apple, sauce-babyfood	All	PB	Apple PDP 2004 - 2005	1056	12	0.0068	10	5 .08	RDF #10	0.0004

Crabapple	All	PB	Apple PDP 2004 - 2005	1056	12	0.0068	100	100	--	Highest Apple PDP Detect Value

0.033	Highest Apple PDP Detect Value

0.033

Loquat	All	NB	Pear PDP 2004 - 2005	721	0	0.0075	100	100	--	Pear ½ LOD Value

0.0075	Pear ½ LOD Value

0.0075

Pear	Uncooked	NB	Pear PDP 2004 - 2005	721	0	0.0075	30	15	--	RDF #11 0.0011

Pear	Cooked	NB/PB	Pear PDP 2004 - 2005	721	0	0.0075	30	15	.08	RDF #11 0.0011

Pear-babyfood	All	PB	Pear PDP 2004 - 2005	721	0	0.0075	30	15	.08	RDF #11 0.0011

Pear, dried	All	PB	Pear PDP 2004 - 2005	721	0	0.0075	30	15	6.250	RDF #11 0.0011

Pear, juice (juice, juice-babyfood)	All	PB	Pear PDP 2004 - 2005	721	0 0.0075	30	15	1.3	RDF #11	0.0011

Quince	All	NB	Pear PDP 2004 - 2005	721	0	0.0075	100	100	--	Pear ½ LOD Value

0.0075	Pear ½ LOD Value

0.0075

Crop Group 12: Stone Fruits

Apricot	Uncooked	NB	Peach PDP 2002	563	1	0.0015	100	100	--	Peach Highest Detect Value

0.005	Peach Highest Detect Value

0.005

Apricot	Cooked	NB/PB	Peach PDP 2002	563	1	0.0015	100	100	.04	Peach Highest Detect Value

0.005	Peach Highest Detect Value

0.005

Apricot, babyfood	All	NB/PB	Peach PDP 2002	563	1	0.0015	100	100	.04 Peach Highest Detect Value

0.005	Peach Highest Detect Value

0.005

Apricot, dried	All	PB	Peach PDP 2002	563	1	0.0015	100	100	6.0	Peach Highest Detect Value

0.005	Peach Highest Detect Value

0.005

Apricot, juice (juice, juice-babyfood)	All	PB	Peach PDP 2002	563	1 0.0015	100	100	--	Peach Highest Detect Value

0.005	Peach Highest Detect Value

0.005

Cherry (cherry, cherry-babyfood)	All	PB	FT

MRID: 45007004

45568001	18	18	0.01	15	5	--	RDF #12	0.1161

Cherry, juice (juice, juice-babyfood)	All	PB	FT

MRID: 45007004

45568001	18	18	0.01	15	5	1.5	RDF #12	0.1161

Nectarine	All	NB	Peach PDP 2002	563	1	0.0015	100	100	--	Highest Peach Detect Value

0.005	Highest Peach Detect Value

0.005

Peach	Uncooked	NB	Peach PDP 2002	563	1	0.0015	10	5	--	RDF #13	0.0001

Peach	Cooked	NB/PB	Peach PDP 2002	563	1	0.0015	10	5	.04	RDF #13	0.0001

Peach, babyfood	All	NB/PB	Peach PDP 2002	563	1	0.0015	10	5	.04	RDF #13 0.0001

Peach, dried (dried, dried-babyfood)	All	PB	Peach PDP 2002	563	1	0.0015 10	5	7.0	RDF #13	0.0001

Peach, juice (juice, juice-babyfood)	All	PB	Peach PDP 2002	563	1	0.0015 10	5	--	RDF #13	0.0001

Plum (plum, plum-babyfood)	All	NB/PB	Plum FT

MRID: 45007006

45568001	18	18	0.01	5	5	--	RDF #14	0.0372

Plum, prune, fresh (fresh, fresh-babyfood)	All	NB/PB	Plum FT

MRID: 45007006

45568001	18	18	0.01	5	5	--	RDF #14	0.0372

Plum, prune, dried (dried, dried-babyfood)	All	PB	Plum FT

MRID: 45007006

45568001	18	18	0.01	5	5	1.4	RDF #14	0.0372

Plum, prune, juice (juice, juice-babyfood)	All	PB	Plum FT

MRID: 45007006

45568001	18	18	0.01	5	5	1.4	RDF #14	0.0372

Crop Group 14: Tree nuts

Almond (almond, almond-babyfood, oil, oil-babyfood)	All	PB	Almond FT

MRID: 45007008

45568001	10	0	0.01	5	5	--	RDF #30	0.01

Brazil nut, Butternut, Cashew, Chestnut, Filbert, Filbert Oil, Hickory nut, Macadamia nut, Pistachio, Walnut	All

PB	Tolerance Level	--	--	--	100	100	--	Tolerance

0.05	Tolerance

0.05

Pecan	All	PB	Pecan FT

MRID:

45007009

ha

@

„@

„`ú^„@

$

%

)

*

T

‘

’

“

µ

å

!

"

*

Ž

˜

´

µ

Ñ

Ò

å

ç

ô

.

@

L

N

p

&

@

@

@

@

@

h

  h

h.

h.

 h

  h

  h

  h

h.

@

@

@

愀Ĥ?欀鵤

@

절・ýᰀ퀂ꀂ瀅䀈

절・ýᰀ퀂ꀂ瀅䀈

절・ýᰀ퀂ꀂ瀅䀈

@

&

@

@

h

h

h

&

@

&

@

&

@

h.

&

&

@

&

&

&

&

&

&

&

&

&

&

&

&

&

&

&

&

&

@

&

@

&

@

&

@

&

@

h.

&

@

&

@

&

@

h.

&

@

&

@

&

@

&

@

&

@

&

@

&

@

@

@

@

 h#g

&

@

@

-

s

È

_

´

h

;

‘

ç

?

•

ë

@

@

@

@

@

ŔȀ碖Ԁᣖ̇̇̇̇ćć혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

ŔȀ碖Ԁᣖ̇̇̇̇ćć혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

ŔȀ碖Ԁᣖ̇̇̇̇ćć혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

ŔȀ碖Ԁᣖ̇̇̇̇ćć혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

ŔȀ碖Ԁᣖ̇̇̇̇ćć혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

ŔȀ碖Ԁᣖ̇̇̇̇ćć혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

혈F蠃퀌‑$怆

$

Highest Wheat Detect Value

0.007	Highest Wheat Detect Value

0.007

Barley, bran	All	B	Wheat PDP 2005	674	1	0.0020	100	100	3.0	Highest Wheat Detect Value

0.007	Highest Wheat Detect Value

0.007

Buckwheat (buckwheat, flour)	All	B	Wheat PDP 2005	674	1	0.0020	100	100 --	Highest Wheat Detect Value

0.007	Highest Wheat Detect Value

0.007

Corn, field (all corn field commodities except syrup)	All	B	Corn, Field FT

MRID:

42253703	4	4	0.01

	2.5	1	--	Blended

0.02	Blended

0.02

Corn, field, syrup	All	B	Corn, Field FT

MRID:

42253703	4	4	0.01

	2.5	1	1.5	Blended

0.02	Blended

0.02

Corn, pop	All	B	FT

Mrid

42253703	4	4	0.01	2.5	1	--	Blended

0.02	0.02

Corn, sweet (sweet, sweet-babyfood)	All	NB	Sweet Corn PDP 2002 -2003	915 0	0.0080	60	45	--	RDF #28	0.0036

Oat (all oat commodities except bran)	All	B	Wheat PDP 2005	674	1	0.0020 100	100	--	Highest Wheat Detect Value

0.007	Highest Wheat Detect Value

0.007

Oat, bran	All	B	Wheat PDP 2005	674	1	0.0020	100	100	3.0	Highest Wheat Detect Value

0.007	Highest Wheat Detect Value

0.007

Rice, white (white, white-babyfood)	All	B	Milled Rice FT

MRID:

44075501

44075502	3	3	0.01	30	15	--	Blended

0.0035	Blended

0.0035

Rice, brown (brown, brown-babyfood)	All	B	Rice FT

MRID:

44075501

44075502	5	5	0.01	30	15	--	Blended

0.346	Blended

0.346

Rice, flour (flour, flour-babyfood)	All	B	Milled Rice

MRID:

44075501

44075502	3	3	0.01	30	15	--	Blended

0.0035	Blended

0.0035

Rice, bran (bran, bran-babyfood)	All	B	Rice FT

MRID:

44075501

44075502	5	5	0.01	30	15	--	Blended

0.346	Blended

0.346

Rye (grain, flour)	All	B	Wheat PDP 2005	674	1	0.0020	100	100	--	Highest Wheat Detect Value

0.007	Highest Wheat Detect Value

0.007

Sorghum (grain, syrup)	All	B	FT

MRID:

41892402	12	10	0.02	2.5	1	--	Blended

0.0775	Blended

0.0775

Triticale, flour (flour, flour-babyfood)	All	B	Wheat PDP 2005	674	1 0.0020	100	100	--	Highest Wheat Detect Value

0.007	Highest Wheat Detect Value

0.007

Wheat (all wheat commodites except bran)	All	B	Wheat PDP 2005	674	1 0.0020	2.5 	1	--	RDF #8	Blended

0.0001

Wheat, bran	All	B	Wheat PDP 2005	674	1	0.0020	2.5	1	3.0	RDF #8	Blended

0.0001

Wild rice 	All	B	Milled Rice

FT

MRID:

44075501

44075502	5	5	0.01	30	15	--	Blended

0.0035	Blended

0.0035

Crop Group 20: Oilseeds

Rapeseed, oil	All	B	Canola FT

MRID: 45032401

45443101

45443102	32	22	0.01	2.5	1	2.3	Blended

0.102	Blended

0.102

Sunflower, seed	All	PB	Sunflower FT

MRID:

43296302	5	5	0.01	20	10	--	RDF #1	0.039

Sunflower, oil	All	B	Sunflower FT

MRID:

43296302	5	5	0.01	20	10	0.2	Blended

0.039	Blended

0.039

Lambda-Cyhalothrin	Dietary Exposure Assessment	DP Number: 334944

PC Code:  128897

________________________________________________________________________ ______________

Page   PAGE  65  of   NUMPAGES  65

Lambda-Cyhalothrin	Dietary Exposure Assessment	DP Number: 334944

PC Code:  128897

________________________________________________________________________ ______________

Lambda-Cyhalothrin	Dietary Exposure Assessment	DP Number: 334944

PC Code:  128897

________________________________________________________________________ ______________


[Federal Register: June 7, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 109)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 31457-31460]
[DOCID:fr07jn07-12]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2007-0386; FRL-8321-7]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Texas; Revision to the Texas State Implementation Plan Regarding a
Negative Declaration for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing
Industry Batch Processing Source Category in El Paso County

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Section 172(c)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires areas
that are not

attaining a National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) to reduce
emissions from existing sources by adopting, at a minimum, reasonably
available control technology (RACT). EPA has established source
categories for which RACT must be implemented. If no major sources of
volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions in a particular source
category exist in a nonattainment area, a State may submit a negative
declaration for that category. Texas submitted a State Implementation
Plan (SIP) revision which included negative declarations for certain
source categories in the El Paso 1-hour ozone standard nonattainment
area. EPA previously approved the State's declaration that no major
sources existed for 9 source categories in the El Paso area. In the
approval EPA neglected to approve the negative declaration for the
synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry (SOCMI) batch
processing category in the El Paso area. EPA is approving this negative
declaration for the El Paso 1-hour ozone standard nonattainment area.

DATES: This rule is effective on August 6, 2007 without further notice,
unless EPA receives relevant adverse comment by July 9, 2007. If EPA
receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take
effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2007-0386, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     EPA Region 6 ``Contact Us'' Web site: http://epa.gov/region6/r6coment.htm.
 Please click on ``6PD'' (Multimedia) and select

``Air'' before submitting comments.
     E-mail: Mr. Carl Young at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please also
send a copy by e-mail to the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section below.
     Fax: Mr. Carl Young, Acting Chief, Air Planning Section
(6PD-L), at fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Mr. Carl Young, Acting Chief, Air Planning Section
(6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
     Hand or Courier Delivery: Mr. Carl Young, Acting Chief,
Air Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Such deliveries are
accepted only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekdays except
for legal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries
of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2007-0386. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,

unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail.

The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,

which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov

your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other contact information in the body of
your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some

information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Planning Section

(6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700,
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. The file will be made available by
appointment for public inspection in the Region 6 FOIA Review Room
between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. weekdays except for legal
holidays. Contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at<PHONE_NUMBER> to make an
appointment. If possible, please make the appointment at least two
working days in advance of your visit. There will be a 15 cent per page
fee for making photocopies of documents. On the day of the visit,
please check in at the EPA Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.
    The State submittal is also available for public inspection at the
State Air Agency listed below during official business hours by
appointment:
    Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Office of Air Quality,
12124 Park 35 Circle, Austin, Texas 78753.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Riley, Air Planning Section
(6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number
214-665-7263; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we'',
``us'', or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.

Outline

I. What is the Background for this Action?
II. What Action is EPA Taking?
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What is the Background for this Action?

    Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA requires SIPs for areas that are not
attaining a NAAQS to provide, at a minimum, for such reductions in air
emissions from existing sources in the areas as may be obtained through
the adoption of reasonably available control measures including RACT.
In our September 17, 1979 Federal Register notice (44 FR 53761) we
define RACT as: ``The lowest emission limitation that a particular
source is capable of meeting by the application of control technology
that is reasonably available considering technological and economical
feasibility.''
    Under CAA section 182(b)(2) State SIPs must require RACT for major
stationary sources of VOC emissions in ozone NAAQS nonattainment areas
classified as moderate or higher. VOC emissions can react with sunlight
and nitrogen oxides to form ground-level ozone. If no major sources of
VOC emissions exist in a particular source category in an ozone
nonattainment area, the State may submit a negative declaration for
that category.
    The El Paso area, consisting of El Paso County, Texas, was
classified as a moderate nonattainment area for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS
on November 6, 1991 (56 FR 56694). On January 10, 1996 Texas submitted
a SIP revision

that included negative declarations for certain source categories in
the El Paso 1-hour ozone standard nonattainment area. The area consists
of El Paso County. We approved the State's declaration that no major
sources existed for 9 source categories in the El Paso area on October
30, 1996 (61 FR 55894). In our approval we neglected to approve the
negative declaration for the synthetic organic chemical manufacturing
industry (SOCMI) batch processing category in the El Paso area. We
reviewed data from the Texas Point Source Emissions Inventory to
confirm that there were no major sources of VOC emissions from SOCMI
batch processing facilities in El Paso County. Our approval of the
State's negative declaration will correct our earlier failure to take
action on the negative declaration submitted by Texas.

II. What Action is EPA Taking?

    We are taking direct final action to approve a negative declaration
submitted by Texas concerning the SOCMI batch processing category in
the El Paso 1-hour ozone standard nonattainment area. Texas submitted
the negative declaration on January 10, 1996. It states that in the El
Paso area there are no major stationary sources of VOC emissions for
the SOCMI batch processing category. We have evaluated the State's
submittal and have determined that it meets the applicable requirements
of the CAA and EPA air quality regulations. We are approving the
negative declaration pursuant to section 110 and part D of the CAA.
    We are also making ministerial corrections to the table in 40 CFR
52.2270(e) to reflect our earlier approval of negative declarations
submitted by Texas.
    We are publishing this rule without prior proposal because we view
this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no relevant adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision if relevant adverse
comments are received. This rule will be effective on August 6, 2007
without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse comment by
July 9, 2007. If we receive relevant adverse comments, we will publish
a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that
the rule will not take effect. We will address all public comments in a
subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. We will not institute
a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in
commenting must do so now. Please note that if we receive adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.

III. Final Action

    We are approving a SIP revision submitted by Texas which states
that there are no major stationary sources of VOC emissions for the
SOCMI batch processing category in the El Paso 1-hour ozone standard
nonattainment area. Texas submitted this negative declaration on
January 10, 1996. We are also making ministerial corrections to the
table in 40 CFR 52.2270(e) to reflect our earlier approval of negative
declarations submitted by Texas.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason and because this action will not have a significant, adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, this action is
also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action merely approves state
law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule
approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA.
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes
federal executive policy on environmental justice. Because this rule
merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard, EPA lacks
the discretionary authority to modify today's regulatory decision on
the basis of environmental justice considerations.
    In reviewing SIP submissions under the National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note), EPA's role is to
approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA.
In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register.

This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. section
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by August 6, 2007. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.

    Dated: May 21, 2007.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.

0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart SS--Texas

0
2. The second table in paragraph (e) entitled ``EPA Approved
Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the Texas
SIP'' is amended by adding entries for ``VOC RACT Negative
Declarations'' and ``VOC RACT Negative Declaration for SOCMI Batch
Processing Source Category'' immediately after the entry ``Revision to
Permitting Regulations and Board Orders No. 85-07, 87-09, 87-17, 88-08,
89-06, 90-05, 91-10, 92-06, 92-18, and 93-17'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.2270  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

              EPA Approved Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the Texas SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Applicable
                                geographic or        State        EPA approval
    Name of SIP provision       nonattainment     submittal/          date                   Comments
                                     area       effective date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
VOC RACT Negative              Beaumont/Port           1/10/96  10/30/96, 61 FR   Ref 52.2299(c)(103).
 Declarations.                  Arthur, Dallas/                  55894.
                                Fort Worth, El
                                Paso, Houston/
                                Galveston.
VOC RACT Negative Declaration  El Paso........         1/10/96  6/7/07 [Insert
 for SOCMI Batch Processing                                      FR page number
 Source Category.                                                where document
                                                                 begins].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-10764 Filed 6-6-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 52 (Monday, March 18, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 16757]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06162]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Twentieth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security
Access Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security
Access Control Systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the
twentieth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security
Access Control Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held April 4, 2013 from 9:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 224. The agenda will
include the following:

April 4, 2013

 Welcome, Introductions & Administrative Remarks
 Review and Approve Summary of Nineteenth Meeting
 Updates from TSA (as required)
 Review Committee Report
 Document Detailed Review
 Document Finalization Process
 Time and Place of Next Meeting
 Any Other Business
 Adjourn
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC on March 12, 2013.
Paige Williams,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-06162 Filed 3-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<meta name=ProgId content=Word.Document>
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11">
<meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Word 11">
<link rel=File-List href="Propionic%20Acid%20Registrations_files/filelist.xml">
<title>Ingredient Query Results</title>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
 name="place"/>

<meta content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http_equiv=Content-Type>

Pending and Active Registrations For

Ingredient

077702 / 79-09-4 / Propionic acid

Registration #<o:p></o:p>

Registration
  Name<o:p></o:p>

Company Name<o:p></o:p>

464-711

PROPIONIC ACID, GRAIN PRESERVER GRADE

DOW CHEMICAL CO., THE

464-717

PROPIONIC ACID, FORMULATING GRADE

DOW CHEMICAL CO., THE

1352-64

BALE GREEN

CARGILL, INC., NUTRENA FEEDS

1352-65

HAY-SHIELD

CARGILL, INC., NUTRENA FEEDS

1352-AA

STORAGE-MATE II

CARGILL, INC., NUTRENA FEEDS

1352-AT

FORAGE-MATE

CARGILL, INC., NUTRENA FEEDS

4959-41

ECONOSAN ACID SANITIZER

WEST AGRO INC

4959-42

<st1:place w:st="on">WEST AGRO</st1:place> ACID SANITIZER

WEST AGRO INC

7969-33

LUPROSIL

BASF CORPORATION

8596-24

KEM PROP LIQUID

KEMIN INDUSTRIES INC

8596-31

KEM SAN

KEMIN INDUSTRIES INC

8596-33

GRAIN SHIELD

KEMIN INDUSTRIES INC

8596-35

FRESH CUT PLUS

KEMIN INDUSTRIES INC

8655-2

EASTMAN PROPIONIC ACID P-RF GRAIN PRESERVATIVE

EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO C/O BRIAN BACON, B-54

8655-5

EASTMAN PROPIONIC ACID P GRAIN AND HAY PRESERVATIVE

EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO C/O BRIAN BACON, B-54

11667-6

PROPIONIC ACID BLEND MUP

BP AMOCO CHEMICAL COMPANY

15265-19

HAY GREEN

WAUSAU CHEMICAL CORP

33270-11

GREEN LABEL

UNITED SUPPLIES INC.

34052-19

HAY CHEM

H. WILSON MANUFACTURING CO INC

34704-IUI

CLEAN CROP MOLD INHIBITOR 70

LOVELAND PRODUCTS, INC.

46059-1

PROPIONIC ACID 68%

CHEMORSE, LTD.

51978-1

BALE CHAMP

DODGEVILLE, AGRI-SERV. CNTR., INC.

56212-1

DMX-7 MOLD INHIBITOR

DELST, INC.

58190-1

ALFA-SAVE

ALLTECH, INC.

58190-3

ALFA-SAVE SPECIAL

ALLTECH, INC.

70728-1

PROMOTE TM PROCHEK GP99.5 L

CARGILL INC

70728-2

PROMOTE PROCHEK GP 77 L

CARGILL INC

73550-R

BALER PLUS

AGRESEARCH, INC.

73550-2

BALER PLUS

AGRESEARCH, INC.

73650-R

PRO-FAME II

M & M LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS CO.

73877-1

BALER'S CHOICE

HARVEST TEC, INC.

74237-1

LIQUID TOXI CHEK CONCENTRATE 8350

LUCTA USA INC.

81949-1

EARLY BALE

CURRAHEE ANIMAL HEALTH

82808-1

FORAGEGUARD

AGROCHEM, INC.

82808-2

HAYFRESH

AGROCHEM, INC.

85AR04

AR State Plant Board

85MS01

MS Dept. of Agriculture & Commerce

85TX02

TX Department of Agriculture

<o:p> </o:p>


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 154 (Friday, August 13, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44677-44681]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16446]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 81

[EPA-R09-OAR-2021-0426; FRL-8710-03-R9]

Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes;
California; Eastern Kern, Sacramento Metro, and Western Nevada 2015
Ozone Nonattainment Areas; Reclassification to Serious

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to grant requests by the California Air
Resources Board (CARB) to reclassify three nonattainment areas in
California from ``Moderate'' to ``Serious'' for the 2015 ozone national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). These three areas are herein
referred to as the Eastern Kern, Sacramento Metro, and Western Nevada
nonattainment areas. In connection with the reclassification, the EPA
is proposing to establish deadlines for submittal of revisions to the
Eastern Kern, Sacramento Metro, and Western Nevada portions of the
California state implementation plan (SIP) to meet additional
requirements for Serious ozone nonattainment areas.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 13, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2021-0426 at https://www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at
Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio,
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written
comment is considered the official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public
comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and
general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. If you need assistance in a
language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities
who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben Leers, Air Planning Office (AIR-
2), EPA Region IX,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we'', ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. Serious Area Requirements and Proposed Schedule
    A. Serious Area Plan Requirements in General
    B. New Source Review and Title V Program Revisions
    C. Reasonably Available Control Technology
    D. Transportation Control
III. Reclassification of Areas of Indian Country
IV. Proposed Action and Request for Public Comment
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    The CAA requires the EPA to establish primary and secondary NAAQS
for certain pervasive pollutants that ``may reasonably be anticipated
to endanger public health and welfare.'' The primary NAAQS is designed
to protect public health with an adequate margin of safety, and the
secondary NAAQS is designed to protect public welfare and the
environment. The EPA has set NAAQS for six common air pollutants,
referred to as criteria pollutants, including ozone. The NAAQS
represent the air quality levels an area must meet to comply with the
CAA. Ozone is a gas composed of three oxygen atoms and is created by
chemical reactions between volatile organic compounds (VOC) and oxides
of nitrogen (NOX) in the atmosphere in the presence of
sunlight. Ground-level ozone can harm human health and the environment.
Ozone exposure has been associated with increases in susceptibility to
respiratory infections, medication use by asthmatics, doctor visits,
and emergency department visits and hospital admissions for individuals
with respiratory disease. Ozone exposure may also contribute to
premature death, especially in people with heart and lung disease.
    In October 2015, the EPA strengthened the primary and secondary
eight-hour ozone NAAQS from 0.075 parts per million (ppm) to 0.070 ppm
(``2015 ozone NAAQS'').\1\ In accordance with section 107(d) of the
CAA, the EPA must designate an area ``nonattainment'' if it is
violating the NAAQS or if it is contributing to a violation of the
NAAQS in a nearby area. With respect to the ozone NAAQS, the EPA
further classifies nonattainment areas as ``Marginal,'' ``Moderate,''
``Serious,'' ``Severe,'' or ``Extreme,'' depending upon the ozone
design value for an area.\2\ As a general matter, higher classified
ozone nonattainment areas are subject to a greater number of, and more
stringent, CAA planning requirements than lower classified areas but
are allowed more time to demonstrate attainment of the ozone NAAQS.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 80 FR 65291 (October 26, 2015).
    \2\ See CAA section 181(a)(1). For the 2015 ozone NAAQS, the
design value at each monitoring site is the annual fourth-highest
daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration, averaged over
three years. The design value for an area is the highest design
value among the monitoring sites in the area.
    \3\ See, generally, subpart 2 of part D of title I of the CAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Effective August 3, 2018, the EPA designated and classified the
Eastern

Kern,\4\ Sacramento Metro,\5\ and Western Nevada \6\ areas under the
CAA as Moderate nonattainment for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.\7\ The EPA's
classification of these areas as Moderate ozone nonattainment
established a requirement that each area attain the 2015 ozone NAAQS as
expeditiously as practicable, but no later than six years from the date
of designation as nonattainment, i.e., August 3, 2024.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Kern County is located in the southernmost portion of
California's Central Valley. The Eastern Kern ozone nonattainment
area, which lies within the Mojave Desert air basin, covers the
eastern portion of Kern County, excluding Indian Wells Valley. The
western portion of Kern County lies within the San Joaquin Valley
air basin and is included within the San Joaquin Valley ozone
nonattainment area. For more detail on the boundaries of the Eastern
Kern ozone nonattainment area, see the entry for ``Kern County
(Eastern Kern), CA'' in the 2015 ozone table in 40 CFR 81.305.
    \5\ The Sacramento Metro nonattainment area includes Sacramento
and Yolo Counties, the eastern portion of Solano County, the western
portions of Placer and El Dorado counties outside of the Lake Tahoe
Basin, and the southern portion of Sutter County. For more detail on
the boundaries of the Sacramento Metro ozone nonattainment area, see
the entry for ``Sacramento Metro, CA'' in the 2015 ozone table in 40
CFR 81.305.
    \6\ Nevada County is located in the north-central Sierra Nevada
Range and includes portions of Tahoe National Forest. The
easternmost portion of Nevada County is excluded from the Western
Nevada ozone nonattainment area and is designated unclassified or
attainment for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. For more detail on the
boundaries of the Western Nevada ozone nonattainment area, see the
entry for ``Nevada County (Western part), CA'' in the 2015 ozone
table in 40 CFR 81.305.
    \7\ 83 FR 25776 (June 4, 2018).
    \8\ See 40 CFR 51.1303(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In August 2020, CARB submitted to the EPA a request from the air
districts in the Sacramento Metro area \9\ to voluntarily reclassify
the Sacramento Metro ozone nonattainment area from Moderate to Serious
nonattainment for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.\10\ In May 2021, CARB submitted
to the EPA requests from the Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control
District and the Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District to
voluntarily reclassify the Eastern Kern and Western Nevada ozone
nonattainment areas, respectively, from Moderate to Serious
nonattainment for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.\11\ In this document, we refer
to the air districts in the Sacramento Metro, Eastern Kern, and Western
Nevada nonattainment areas collectively as the ``districts.'' Under the
EPA's ozone implementation rules at 40 CFR 51.1303(b), the EPA must
approve a state's request, for any reason, for a higher classification
for an ozone nonattainment area, in accordance with CAA section
181(b)(3).\12\ We find that the plain language of CAA section 181(b)(3)
and 40 CFR 51.1303(b) mandates that we approve these voluntary
reclassification requests, and thus, the EPA proposes in this action to
grant CARB's request to reclassify the Eastern Kern, Sacramento Metro,
and Western Nevada nonattainment areas from Moderate to Serious for the
2015 ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The Sacramento Metro area is regulated by five local air
districts: The Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management
District (AQMD), the Feather River AQMD, the El Dorado County AQMD,
the Yolo-Solano AQMD, and the Placer County Air Pollution Control
District.
    \10\ Letter dated August 3, 2020, from Richard W. Corey,
Executive Officer, CARB, to John Busterud, Regional Administrator,
EPA Region IX, requesting voluntary reclassification of Sacramento
Metro to Serious nonattainment for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
    \11\ Letters, dated April 30, 2021 and May 15, 2021, from
Richard W. Corey, Executive Officer, CARB, to Deborah Jordan, Acting
Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX, requesting voluntary
reclassification of Western Nevada and Eastern Kern to Serious
nonattainment for the 2015 ozone NAAQS, respectively.
    \12\ CAA section 181(b)(3) provides that the EPA shall grant the
request of any state to reclassify an ozone nonattainment area to a
higher classification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Serious Area Requirements and Proposed Schedule

    In this action, we are proposing to reclassify the Eastern Kern,
Sacramento Metro, and Western Nevada nonattainment areas from Moderate
to Serious for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. We are also proposing to establish
a schedule for the State to submit SIP revisions to address the
planning requirements made applicable to each area as a result of its
higher classification, including both the general air quality planning
requirements under CAA section 172(c) and the specific requirements for
Serious areas under CAA section 182(c), as interpreted and described in
the final SIP Requirements Rule for the 2015 ozone NAAQS (``2015 Ozone
SRR'').\13\ Deadlines for the submittal of specific planning elements
are described in Section II of this notice. Upon the effective date of
a final action granting the reclassification, the areas would be
required to attain the 2015 ozone NAAQS as expeditiously as
practicable, but no later than nine years from the effective date of
designation as nonattainment, i.e., no later than August 3, 2027.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ The EPA promulgated the 2015 Ozone SRR at 40 CFR part 51,
subpart CC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Serious Area Plan Requirements in General

    The 2015 Ozone SRR requires states to submit a SIP revision
including a Serious area attainment demonstration, reasonable further
progress demonstration, reasonably available control measures, and
contingency measures for the 2015 ozone NAAQS no later than four years
from the area's date of designation as nonattainment.\14\ Additionally,
for the Sacramento area, California would be required to certify that
its current motor vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program
meets the requirements for an enhanced I/M program as required by the
CAA and the EPA's I/M regulations.\15\ CARB would also need to either
submit a SIP revision that addresses the CAA's requirements for a clean
fuel vehicle program or certify that that its currently approved
substitute measure continues to meet CAA requirements.\16\ Neither
Eastern Kern nor Western Nevada meet the minimum population-based
applicability thresholds for the enhanced I/M and clean fuel vehicle
program requirements.\17\ We are proposing not to alter the four-year
schedule for submittal of Serious area SIP revisions under the 2015
Ozone SRR. Therefore, following the EPA's final reclassification of
Eastern Kern, Sacramento Metro, and Western Nevada to Serious ozone
nonattainment, CARB would be required to submit a SIP revision
addressing the Serious area elements listed in this section by August
3, 2022 (i.e., four years from the areas' designation as
nonattainment).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See CAA section 182(c) and 83 FR 62988. We encourage CARB
and the districts to work with EPA Region IX staff to confirm the
specific planning requirements applicable to each area.
    \15\ CAA section 182(c)(3) and 40 CFR part 51 subpart S.
    \16\ CAA sections 182(c)(4) and 246(a).
    \17\ CAA section 182(c)(3)(A) and 246(a), respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. New Source Review and Title V Program Revisions

    Typically, when we reclassify an area to a higher ozone
classification, the state must amend its new source review (NSR) rules
for the area to reflect the lower NSR major source threshold, lower
major modification threshold (as applicable), and higher NSR offset
ratio corresponding to the higher classification. Under CAA 182(c), the
major source threshold for areas reclassified from Moderate to Serious
is lowered from 100 tons per year (tpy) to 50 tpy. Under the EPA's NSR
regulations, the significant emissions rates that define major
modifications for NOX and VOC in areas reclassified from
Moderate to Serious are lowered from 40 tpy to 25 tpy.\18\ Under CAA
section 182(c)(10), the VOC and NOX offset ratios for major
sources and modifications in a Serious nonattainment area must be at
least 1.2 to 1. Reclassification to Serious ozone nonattainment would
typically also

require changes to the districts' title V operating permits programs
necessary to reflect the change in the major source threshold for
Serious areas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(x).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Eastern Kern and Western Nevada ozone nonattainment areas are
currently classified as Serious for the 2008 ozone NAAQS and therefore
are currently subject to the lower major source and major modification
thresholds and higher offset ratios applicable to Serious ozone
nonattainment areas. The Sacramento Metro nonattainment area is
classified as Severe for the 2008 ozone NAAQS and is therefore subject
to the more stringent major source and major modification thresholds
and offset ratio applicable to Severe ozone nonattainment areas. For
this reason, we anticipate that reclassification to Serious for the
2015 ozone NAAQS will not require the districts to amend their NSR
rules to incorporate the requirements for Serious nonattainment areas
and that the districts may therefore satisfy the applicable NSR
requirements by certifying that their current NSR programs address
Serious area requirements.
    We are proposing under our general CAA section 301(a) authority to
establish a deadline of August 3, 2022, for the State to submit, for
each area, revised NSR rules or a certification that the area's current
NSR program is sufficient to meet the applicable requirements. We are
also proposing under CAA section 301(a) to establish a deadline of
August 3, 2022, for each area to submit revised title V program rules
reflecting the Serious area major source definition. Given the narrow
scope of the required revisions, we anticipate a deadline of August 3,
2022, will allow the districts sufficient time to make the required
changes without imposing a lengthy delay in the requirement for sources
newly subject to the title V program to submit a timely
application.\19\ Additionally, this date is the same as the submittal
due date for other Serious area elements and will allow the districts
to submit any NSR and title V revisions together with these other
elements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ A source newly subject to the title V permit program is
required to submit a title V application within 12 months after the
source becomes subject to the program. See 40 CFR 70.5(a)(1)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Reasonably Available Control Technology

    Ozone nonattainment areas classified as Moderate and above are
required to implement reasonably available control technology (RACT)
for major sources.\20\ Major sources are defined for Moderate areas as
sources that emit or have the potential to emit 100 tpy of VOC or
NOX.\21\ For Serious areas reclassified from Moderate, the
requirement for RACT expands to include all sources that emit, or have
the potential to emit, 50 tpy of VOC or NOX.\22\ Thus,
following reclassification from Moderate to Serious, states must revise
their RACT SIPs to include those other sources emitting or having the
potential to emit between 50 and 100 tpy. Under 40 CFR
51.1312(a)(2)(ii), RACT SIP submittals are due 24 months from the
effective date of reclassification or a deadline otherwise established
by the EPA in the reclassification action. Under 40 CFR
51.1312(a)(3)(ii), RACT requirements triggered by reclassification
should be implemented as expeditiously as practicable, but no later
than the start of the attainment year ozone season associated with the
area's new attainment deadline, or January 1 of the third year after
the associated SIP revision submittal deadline, whichever is earlier;
or by a deadline otherwise established by the EPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ CAA sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f).
    \21\ CAA section 302(j).
    \22\ CAA sections 182(c) and 182(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with 40 CFR 51.1312(a)(2)(ii), we are proposing to
establish a deadline of 24 months from the effective date of
reclassification to Serious for Eastern Kern, Sacramento Metro, and
Western Nevada to submit a Serious area RACT SIP. Consistent with 40
CFR 51.1312(a)(3)(ii), we are proposing a deadline for implementation
of Serious area RACT rules as expeditiously as practicable but no later
than the start of the attainment year ozone season associated with the
affected areas' new attainment date (i.e., January 1, 2027, as
proposed) \23\ or January 1 of the third year after the affected areas'
Serious area RACT SIP submittal deadline,\24\ whichever is earlier.
Eastern Kern, Sacramento Metro, and Western Nevada each remain subject
to the Moderate area RACT implementation deadline of January 1, 2023,
under 40 CFR 51.1312(a)(3)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ Because ozone nonattainment areas in California have a
year-round ozone season, the start of the attainment year ozone
season associated with each area's new attainment date would be
January 1, 2027.
    \24\ If the EPA issues a final reclassification action that is
effective in calendar year 2021, January 1 of the third year after
the RACT SIP submittal deadline would be January 1, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. Transportation Control

    CAA section 182(c)(5) requires ozone nonattainment areas that are
classified as Serious to submit a demonstration as to whether current
aggregate vehicle mileage, aggregate vehicle emissions, congestion
levels, and other relevant parameters are consistent with those used
for the area's demonstration of attainment. The CAA requires the first
report to be submitted 6 years after November 15, 1990, which is two
years after the deadline for Serious area attainment demonstrations,
and every three years thereafter.\25\ Consistent with this schedule, we
are proposing that the first report be submitted 24 months after the
attainment demonstrations for these areas are due (i.e., August 3,
2024) and every three years thereafter. If a demonstration shows that
such parameters and emissions levels exceed the levels projected for
purposes of the area's attainment demonstration, the State would be
required to develop and submit a SIP revision within 18 months that
includes transportation control measures to reduce emissions to levels
that are consistent with those projected in the demonstration.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ CAA section 182(c)(2).
    \26\ CAA section 182(c)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Reclassification of Areas of Indian Country

    Because the State of California does not have jurisdiction over
Indian country geographically located within the borders of the state,
CARB's reclassification requests do not apply to the areas of Indian
country within the boundaries of the nonattainment areas identified in
40 CFR 81.305. In these areas of Indian country, the EPA implements
federal CAA programs, including reclassifications, consistent with our
discretionary authority under sections 301(a) and 301(d)(4) of the CAA.
There are no tribal lands located within the boundaries of the Eastern
Kern and Western Nevada ozone nonattainment areas. The Sacramento Metro
ozone nonattainment area includes lands of four federally recognized
tribes: The Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, Shingle Springs
Rancheria (Verona Tract); the United Auburn Indian Community of the
Auburn Rancheria of California; the Wilton Rancheria; and the Yocha
Dehe Wintun Nation.
    The EPA contacted tribal officials from each of the federally
recognized tribes having jurisdiction over lands within the boundaries
of the Sacramento Metro ozone nonattainment area to invite government-
to-government consultation on this rulemaking. Under the EPA's
Consultation Policy, the EPA consults on a government-to-government
basis with federally recognized tribal governments when the EPA's
actions and decisions may affect tribal interests.

No tribes requested government-to-government consultation on this
action.
    We have considered the relevance of our proposal to reclassify the
Sacramento Metro area as Serious nonattainment for the 2015 ozone NAAQS
for each tribe located within the Sacramento Metro area. We believe
that the same facts and circumstances that support the proposal for the
non-Indian country lands also support the proposal for reservation
areas of Indian country and any other areas of Indian country where the
EPA or a tribe has demonstrated that the tribe has jurisdiction located
within the Sacramento Metro area. In this particular case, the State's
reclassification request is based on modeling results that show that a
longer timeframe is necessary to attain the 2015 ozone NAAQS for the
Sacramento Metro area. The longer timeframes will provide the time
necessary to realize full implementation of the stationary and mobile
source regulations contained in the districts' attainment plans.
Additionally, uniformity of classification throughout a nonattainment
area is a guiding principle and premise when an area is being
reclassified. Ozone and ozone precursors are pervasive pollutants that
can be transported throughout a nonattainment area. Therefore,
boundaries for nonattainment areas are drawn to encompass both areas
with direct sources of pollution as well as nearby areas in the same
airshed in which ozone can be transported. Each nonattainment area is
assigned an initial classification that applies consistently within the
boundaries of the area. The EPA believes this approach best ensures
public health protection from the adverse effects of ozone pollution.
Therefore, it is generally counterproductive from an air quality and
planning perspective to have a different classification for a land area
located within the boundaries of a nonattainment area, such as the
areas of Indian country in the Sacramento Metro ozone nonattainment
area. Accordingly, based on the EPA's discretionary authority under
sections 301(a) and 301(d)(4) of the CAA to implement federal CAA
programs in these areas of Indian country, including reclassifications,
the EPA is proposing to reclassify areas of Indian country
geographically located in the Sacramento Metro area to Serious
nonattainment for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
    The Sacramento Metro area and the tribes located within its
boundaries are currently designated as Severe, i.e., one classification
higher than Serious, for the 1997 and 2008 ozone NAAQS. An area's
applicable major source thresholds and offset ratios for NSR and title
V programs are based on the area's highest ozone classification.
Because these areas of Indian country are already classified as a
higher classification for the 1997 and 2008 ozone NAAQS, the major
source thresholds and offset ratios for NSR and title V programs
applicable to the tribes in the Sacramento Metro area will not change.
This reclassification also will not affect projects proposed in these
areas of Indian country that require federal permits, approvals, or
funding under the EPA's general conformity rule because such projects
are already subject to the de minimis thresholds and offset ratios for
Severe ozone nonattainment areas. We note that, while eligible tribes
may seek EPA approval of relevant tribal programs under the CAA, none
of the affected tribes would be required to submit an implementation
plan as a result of this reclassification.
    In light of the considerations outlined in this notice that support
retention of a uniformly-classified ozone nonattainment area and our
proposal to approve the State's voluntary reclassification request, we
propose to reclassify the entire Sacramento Metro nonattainment area,
including reservation areas of Indian country and any other area of
Indian country located within it where the EPA or a tribe has
demonstrated that the tribe has jurisdiction, as Serious nonattainment
for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. The EPA specifically solicits additional
comment on this proposed rule from tribal officials.

IV. Proposed Action and Request for Public Comment

    Pursuant to CAA section 181(b)(3), we are proposing to grant CARB's
request to reclassify the Eastern Kern, Sacramento Metro, and Western
Nevada ozone nonattainment areas from Moderate to Serious for the 2015
ozone NAAQS. As described in Section III of this notice, our proposal
to reclassify Sacramento Metro to Serious for the 2015 ozone NAAQS
includes reservation areas of Indian country and any other area of
Indian country located within it where the EPA or a tribe has
demonstrated that the tribe has jurisdiction.
    As described in Section II of this document, the EPA is proposing a
schedule for the State and districts to submit SIP revisions addressing
Serious area requirements and to submit revisions to the title V
operating permit rules for Eastern Kern, Sacramento Metro, and Western
Nevada. Under the EPA's proposed schedule, California would be required
to submit SIP revisions addressing Serious area requirements for the
affected areas, including an attainment demonstration, reasonable
further progress demonstration, reasonably available control measures,
contingency measures, motor vehicle I/M program, and clean fuel vehicle
program, as applicable, by August 3, 2022. Submittal of any
corresponding revisions to NSR and title V program rules that apply in
the affected areas would also be due by August 3, 2022. A SIP revision
including Serious area RACT rules for the affected areas would be due
24 months from the effective date of the reclassification. Lastly, the
EPA is proposing a deadline for implementation of Serious area RACT
rules as expeditiously as practicable but no later than the start of
the attainment year ozone season associated with the affected areas'
new attainment date or January 1 of the third year after the affected
areas' Serious area RACT SIP submittal deadline, whichever is earlier.
We will accept comments from the public on this proposed rule for the
next 30 days. The deadline and instructions for submission of comments
are provided in the DATES and ADDRESSES sections at the beginning of
this preamble.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and
13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011), this proposed action is not a
``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not subject to
Executive Order 12866. With respect to lands under state jurisdiction,
voluntary reclassifications under CAA section 181(b)(3) are based
solely upon requests by the state, and the EPA is required under the
CAA to grant them. These actions do not, in and of themselves, impose
any new requirements on any sectors of the economy. In addition,
because the statutory requirements are clearly defined with respect to
the differently classified areas, and because those requirements are
automatically triggered by reclassification, reclassification does not
impose a materially adverse impact under Executive Order 12866. For
these reasons, this proposed action is also not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).
    In addition, I certify that this proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) and that this
proposed rule does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4), because the EPA is
required to grant requests by states for voluntary reclassifications,
and such reclassifications in and of themselves do not impose any
federal intergovernmental mandate, and because tribes are not subject
to implementation plan submittal deadlines that apply to states as a
result of reclassifications.
    Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) requires the
EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely
input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies
that have tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal
implications'' is defined in Executive Order 13175 to include
regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the federal government and Indian tribes.'' Four Indian tribes
have areas of Indian country located within the boundaries of the
Sacramento Metro ozone nonattainment area, and there are no areas of
Indian country located in the Eastern Kern and Western Nevada ozone
nonattainment areas. The EPA implements federal CAA programs, including
reclassifications, in these areas of Indian country within the
boundaries of the Sacramento Metro area, consistent with our
discretionary authority under sections 301(a) and 301(d)(4) of the CAA.
The EPA has concluded that this proposed rule might have tribal
implications for the purposes of Executive Order 13175 but would not
impose substantial direct costs upon the tribes, nor would it preempt
Tribal law. As discussed in Section III of this document, this proposed
rule does not affect the implementation of NSR or title V programs in
these areas of Indian country, nor does it affect projects proposed in
these areas of Indian country that require federal permits, approvals,
or funding under the EPA's general conformity rule. None of the
affected tribes would be required to submit an implementation plan as a
result of this reclassification.
    The EPA contacted tribal officials early in the process of
developing this proposed rule to provide an opportunity to have
meaningful and timely input into its development. On December 11, 2020,
we sent letters to leaders of the four tribal governments representing
the areas of Indian country in the nonattainment area offering
government-to-government consultation and seeking input on how we could
best communicate with the tribes on this rulemaking effort. No tribes
requested government-to-government consultation on this action.
    Executive Order 12898 establishes federal executive policy on
environmental justice. Its main provision directs federal agencies, to
the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, to make
environmental justice part of their mission by identifying and
addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human
health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and
activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the
United States. This reclassification action does not provide the EPA
with the discretionary authority to address disproportionate human
health or environmental effects with practical, appropriate, and
legally permissible methods under Executive Order 12898.
    This proposed action also does not have federalism implications
because it does not have substantial direct effects on the states, on
the relationship between the national government and the states, nor on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This proposed action does not alter the relationship
or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the
CAA.
    This proposed rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045,
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because the EPA interprets
Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that
concern health or safety risks, such that the analysis required under
section 5-501 of Executive Order 13045 has the potential to influence
the regulation.
    As this proposal would set a deadline for the submittal of CAA
required plans and information, the requirements of section 12(d) of
the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This proposed rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, National parks, Ozone, Wilderness areas.

     Dated: July 13, 2021.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2021-16446 Filed 8-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P