[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 194 (Friday, October 5, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60889-60891]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24280]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0491; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-265-AD;
Amendment 39-17207; AD 2012-20-01]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, and -200C series airplanes.
This AD was prompted by a report of a severed upper butt strap, and
cracks in the forward skin and bonded doubler, on one airplane. This AD
requires repetitive inspections for cracks and a chemical spot test in
the area of station (STA) 908, and related investigative and corrective
actions, if necessary. For certain airplanes, this AD requires an
inspection and modification. We are issuing this AD to prevent cracks
at the adjacent mating skins (forward and aft), which could initiate
just above stringers S-4R and S-4L; and could grow and result in a
decompression event.

DATES: This AD is effective November 9, 2012.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of November 9,
2012.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wayne Lockett, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM published in the Federal Register on June 4, 2012 (77 FR
32918). That NPRM proposed to require repetitive inspections for cracks
and a chemical spot test in the area of STA 908, and related
investigative and corrective actions, if necessary. For certain
airplanes, that NPRM also proposed to require an inspection and
modification.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comment received on the proposal
(77 FR 32918, June 4, 2012) and the FAA's response to the comment.

Request To Relocate Terminating Action Statement

    Boeing requested that we relocate the terminating action statement
related to confirmed 2000 series aluminum from paragraph (h)(2) of the
NPRM (77 FR 32918, June 4, 2012) to paragraph (j) of the NPRM.
    We disagree with the request to relocate the sentence. The
terminating action specified in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD only
terminates the actions specified in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.
Paragraph (j) of the AD allows operators to forego all requirements of
this AD, including the initial inspection, repetitive inspections, and
chemical spot test requirements, by replacing the butt strap with a new
part made of the correct material, and doing related investigative and
corrective actions, as applicable. No change has been made to the AD in
this regard.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD as proposed.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 61 airplanes of U.S registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
             Action                     Labor cost          Parts cost     Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection and test............  166 work-hours x $85                 $0  $14,110 per         $860,710 per
                                  per hour = $14,110 per                   inspection cycle.   inspection cycle.
                                  inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, we have received no definitive data that would enable
us to provide cost estimates for the actions that would be required for
Group 1 airplanes.
    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary related
investigative actions, repairs, and installations that would be
required based on the results of the inspection and test. We have no
way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these
actions:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                    Action                                 Labor cost               Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related investigative actions, repair,          173 work-hours x $85 per hour =               $0         $14,705
 installation.                                   $14,705.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2012-20-01 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17207; Docket No. FAA-
2012-0491; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-265-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective November 9, 2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, and -
200C series airplanes; certificated in any category; as identified
in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1313, dated
November 3, 2011.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 53; Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report of a severed upper butt strap,
and cracks in the forward skin and bonded doubler, on one airplane.
We are issuing this AD to prevent cracks at the adjacent mating
skins (forward and aft), which could initiate just above stringers
S-4R and S-4L; and could grow and result in a decompression event.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Actions for Group 1 Airplanes

    For Group 1 airplanes, as identified in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-53-1313, dated November 3, 2011: Within 120
days after the effective date of this AD, inspect and modify, as
required, using a method approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.

(h) Actions for Groups 2 and 3 Airplanes

    For Groups 2 and 3 airplanes, as identified in Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1313, dated November 3, 2011:
Except as provided by paragraph (i)(1) of this AD, at the applicable
times identified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1313, dated November 3,
2011, do the actions specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of
this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1313, dated
November 3, 2011, except as provided by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD.
    (1) Do one of the inspection options identified in paragraphs
(h)(1)(i), (h)(1)(ii), and (h)(1)(iii) of this AD; and do all
applicable related investigative and corrective actions. Do all
applicable related investigative and corrective actions before
further flight.
    (i) Inspection Option 1: Do a detailed inspection for cracks of
the station (STA) 908 forward and aft skin. Thereafter, repeat the
inspection at intervals not to exceed 500 flight cycles until the
chemical spot test required by paragraph (h)(2) of this AD is done.
    (ii) Inspection Option 2: Do a one-time external low-frequency
eddy current (LFEC) inspection for cracks of the STA 908 upper butt
strap.
    (iii) Inspection Option 3: Do a one-time internal LFEC
inspection for cracks of the STA 908 upper butt strap.
    (2) Do a chemical spot test of the STA 908 upper butt strap to
determine the part material, and do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions. Do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions at the times specified in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-53-1313, dated November 3, 2011, except as provided by
paragraph (i)(1) of this AD. Confirming the upper butt strap is made
from 2000 series aluminum terminates the inspections required by
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.

(i) Exceptions to the Service Information

    (1) Where Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1313,
dated November 3, 2011, specifies a compliance time ``after the
original issue date of the service bulletin,'' this AD requires
compliance within the specified compliance time after the effective
date of this AD.
    (2) Where Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1313,
dated November 3, 2011, specifies to contact Boeing for repair

instructions: Before further flight, repair using a method approved
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this
AD.

(j) Terminating Action

    Replacing the STA 908 upper butt strap and doing all applicable
related investigative and corrective actions, in accordance with
Part 4, Part 5, and Part 6, of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1313, dated
November 3, 2011, except as provided by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD,
terminates the inspections and chemical spot test required by this
AD.

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.

(l) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Wayne Lockett,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1313, dated
November 3, 2011.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(425) 227-1221.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 21, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-24280 Filed 10-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 217 (Tuesday, November 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 69770]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28612]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Operating
Requirements: Domestic, Flag and Supplemental Operations

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. 14 CFR part 121 prescribes the requirements governing air
carrier operations. The information collected is used to determine air
operators' compliance with the minimum safety standards and the
applicants' eligibility for air operations certification.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by December 10, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be
addressed to the attention of the Desk Officer, Department of
Transportation/FAA, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronda Thompson at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0008.
    Title: Operating Requirements: Domestic, Flag and Supplemental
Operations.
    Form Numbers: There are no FAA forms associated with this
collection of information.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the following collection of information
was published on August 12, 2015 (80 FR 48390). Under the authority of
Title 49 CFR, Section 44701, Federal Aviation Regulations Part 121,
prescribe the terms, conditions, and limitations as are necessary to
ensure safety in air transportation. Each operator which seeks to
obtain, or is in possession of, an air carrier operating certificate
must comply with the requirements of FAR Part 121 in order to maintain
data which is used to determine if the air carrier is operating in
accordance with minimum safety standards.
    Respondents: Approximately 75 air operators/applicants.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 27.52 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 1,430,987 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 4, 2015.
Ronda Thompson,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, Performance, Policy &
Records Management Branch (ASP-110).
[FR Doc. 2015-28612 Filed 11-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57087-57089]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23164]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-87353; File No. SR-NYSE-2019-56]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Extend the Current Pilot Program Related to Rule 7.10

October 18, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that on October 16, 2019, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to extend the current pilot program related
to Rule 7.10 (Clearly Erroneous Executions) to the close of business on
April 20, 2020. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to extend the current
pilot program related to Rule 7.10 (Clearly Erroneous Executions) to
the close of business on April 20, 2020. The pilot program is currently
due to expire on October 18, 2019.
    On September 10, 2010, the Commission approved, on a pilot basis,
changes to Rule 128 (Clearly Erroneous Executions) that, among other
things: (i) Provided for uniform treatment of clearly
erroneous[thinsp]execution reviews in multi-stock events involving
twenty or more securities; and (ii) reduced the ability of the Exchange
to deviate from the objective standards set forth in the rule.\4\ In
2013, the Exchange adopted a provision to Rule 128 designed to address
the operation of the Plan.\5\ Finally, in 2014, the Exchange adopted
two additional provisions to Rule 128 providing that: (i) A series of
transactions in a particular security on one or more trading days may
be viewed as one event if all such transactions were effected based on
the same fundamentally incorrect or grossly misinterpreted issuance
information resulting in a severe valuation error for all such
transactions; and (ii) in the event of any disruption or malfunction in
the operation of the electronic communications and trading facilities
of an Exchange, another SRO, or responsible single plan processor in
connection with the transmittal or receipt of a trading halt, an
Officer, acting on his or her own motion, shall nullify any transaction
that occurs after a trading halt has been declared by the primary
listing market for a security and before such trading halt has
officially ended according to the primary listing market.\6\ Rule 128
is no longer applicable to any securities that trade on the Exchange
and has been replaced with Rule 7.10, which is substantively identical
to Rule 128.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62886 (Sept. 10,
2010), 75 FR 56613 (Sept. 16, 2010) (SR-NYSE-2010-47).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68804 (Feb. 1,
2013), 78 FR 8677 (Feb. 6, 2013) (SR-NYSE-2013-11).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72434 (June 19,
2014), 79 FR 36110 (June 25, 2014) (SR-NYSE-2014-22).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 82945 (March 26,
2019), 83 FR 13553, 13565 (March 29, 2019) (SR-NYSE-2017-36)
(Approval Order) and 85962 (May 29, 2019), 84 FR 26188, 26189 n.13
(June 5, 2019) (SR-NYSE-2019-05) (Approval Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    These changes were originally scheduled to operate for a pilot
period to coincide with the pilot period for the Plan to Address
Extraordinary Market Volatility (the ``Limit Up-Limit Down Plan'' or
``LULD Plan''),\8\ including any extensions to the pilot period for the
LULD Plan.\9\ In April 2019, the Commission approved an amendment to
the LULD Plan for it to operate on a permanent, rather than pilot,
basis.\10\ In light of that change, the Exchange amended Rules 7.10 and
128 to untie the pilot program's effectiveness from that of the LULD
Plan and to extend the pilot's effectiveness to the close of business
on October 18, 2019.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May 31,
2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012) (the ``Limit Up-Limit Down
Release'').
    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71821 (March 27,
2014), 79 FR 18592 (April 2, 2014) (SR-NYSE-2014-17).
    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85623 (April 11,
2019), 84 FR 16086 (April 17, 2019) (approving Eighteenth Amendment
to LULD Plan).
    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85523 (April 5,
2019), 84 FR 14706 (April 11, 2019) (SR-NYSE-2019-17).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange now proposes to amend Rule 7.10 to extend the pilot
program's effectiveness for a further six months until the close of
business on April 20, 2020. If the pilot period is not either extended,
replaced or approved as permanent, the prior versions of paragraphs
(c), (e)(2), (f), and (g) shall be in effect, and the provisions of
paragraphs (i) through (k) shall be null and void.\12\ In such an
event, the remaining sections of Rules 7.10 would continue to apply to
all transactions executed on the Exchange. The Exchange understands
that the other national securities exchanges and Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (``FINRA'') will also file similar proposals to
extend their respective clearly erroneous execution pilot programs, the
substance of which are identical to Rule 7.10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See supra notes 4-6. The prior versions of paragraphs (c),
(e)(2), (f), and (g) generally provided greater discretion to the
Exchange with respect to breaking erroneous trades.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange does not propose any additional changes to Rule 7.10.
Extending the effectiveness of Rule 7.10 for an additional six months
will provide the Exchange and other self-regulatory organizations
additional time to consider whether further amendments to the clearly
erroneous execution rules are appropriate.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the

Act,\13\ in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\14\ in particular,
in that it is designed to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest and not to permit unfair
discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. The
Exchange believes that the proposed rule change promotes just and
equitable principles of trade in that it promotes transparency and
uniformity across markets concerning review of transactions as clearly
erroneous. The Exchange believes that extending the clearly erroneous
execution pilot under Rule 7.10 for an additional six months would help
assure that the determination of whether a clearly erroneous trade has
occurred will be based on clear and objective criteria, and that the
resolution of the incident will occur promptly through a transparent
process. The proposed rule change would also help assure consistent
results in handling erroneous trades across the U.S. equities markets,
thus furthering fair and orderly markets, the protection of investors
and the public interest. Based on the foregoing, the Exchange believes
the amended clearly erroneous executions rule should continue to be in
effect on a pilot basis while the Exchange and other self-regulatory
organizations consider whether further amendments to these rules are
appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposal would ensure
the continued, uninterrupted operation of harmonized clearly erroneous
execution rules across the U.S. equities markets while the Exchange and
other self-regulatory organizations consider whether further amendments
to these rules are appropriate. The Exchange understands that the other
national securities exchanges and FINRA will also file similar
proposals to extend their respective clearly erroneous execution pilot
programs. Thus, the proposed rule change will help to ensure
consistency across market centers without implicating any competitive
issues.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \15\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \17\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \18\ permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed
rule change may become effective and operative immediately upon filing.
The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, as
it will allow the current clearly erroneous execution pilot program to
continue uninterrupted, without any changes, while the Exchange and the
other national securities exchanges consider a permanent proposal for
clearly erroneous execution reviews. For this reason, the Commission
hereby waives the 30-day operative delay and designates the proposed
rule change as operative upon filing.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \19\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2019-56 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2019-56. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should

submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2019-56 and should be
submitted on or before November 14, 2019.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-23164 Filed 10-23-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 59706]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23563]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0656]

Secure Supply Chain Pilot Program; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a
document that appeared in the Federal Register of August 20, 2013 (78
FR 51192). The document announced the start of the Secure Supply Chain
Pilot Program (SSCPP). The document was published with an incorrect
email address for the SSCPP mailbox. This document corrects that error.
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katharine Neckers, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Building 51, Rm. 4259,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2013-20215, appearing on page
51192 in the Federal Register of August 20, 2013, the following
correction is made:
    On page 51194, in the second column, under ``IV. Process for
Applying to Participate in the Pilot,'' in the third full paragraph,
the sentence that reads ``For communications other than the submission
of the SSCPP application (Form FDA 3676), please contact the CDER SSCPP
mailbox at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>is corrected to read ``For
communications other than the submission of the SSCPP application (Form
FDA 3676), please contact the CDER SSCPP mailbox at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: September 24, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-23563 Filed 9-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P